TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

@tlowdon - Don Wolt

2.24.22: UK infection rates, since Omicron arrived, rose much faster among the boosted vs the unvaxxed & remain higher in all boosted adult cohorts. Both boosted & unvaxxed continue to get infected & spread - and in adults, the boosted much more so - invalidating vaxx mandates.

@tlowdon - Don Wolt

Infection rate growth since Omicron became dominant (Rept Wks 50 to 8) is much higher in all boosted cohorts. In boosted adults ≥50, growth increases sharply with age or time since boosting - whereas infection rate growth in the unvaxxed is more consistent across cohorts. Why?

@tlowdon - Don Wolt

Reminder: 🔸1st chart shows infection RATES, not absolute numbers. 🔸Rates are among distinct sub groups, Boosted (≥14 days) & Unvaxxed, for each age cohort. 🔸Each bar represents 4 prior weeks of data from the most recent UKHSA vaxx surveillance report.

@tlowdon - Don Wolt

The fully vaxxed (which include the boosted) may be much more susceptible to Omicron infection than their unvaxxed peers. When Omi reached >50% prevalence (Wk 49), infection rates suddenly rose much more sharply & reached higher levels in all fully-vaxxed adult age cohorts.

@tlowdon - Don Wolt

UK booster uptake continues to taper off in recent weeks, but all age cohorts above 40 y.o. are now >50% boosted.

@tlowdon - Don Wolt

The Omicron variant arrived in the UK in November and quickly became dominant (>50%) by about week 49, the 2nd week of December.

@tlowdon - Don Wolt

The data still show apparent VE in reducing severe outcomes. But the fatality risk following a CoV2+ test for anyone <50 remains very low & the risk to those <30 is effectively zero - again, making mandatory vaccination utterly unwarranted. The ratios here vary from 1.0X-4.5X.

@tlowdon - Don Wolt

For those questioning the use of NIMS population figures in the denominator versus those from ONS, UK HSA again defends its use of NIMS data in this report on page 39 in blogs linked to from this page.

@tlowdon - Don Wolt

Note: UK HSA warns against using this data to estimate VE. I'm not estimating VE, though. I'm observing trends & highlighting differences in the various rates between the vaxxed & unvaxxed - and using these to point out the invalidity of vaxx mandates, not of vaccines themselves.

@tlowdon - Don Wolt

Sources: https://gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-vaccine-weekly-surveillance-reports https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1056487/Technical-Briefing-36-22.02.22.pdf Prior Week's Thread: https://gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-vaccine-weekly-surveillance-reports… https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1056487/Technical-Briefing-36-22.02.22.pdf Prior

COVID-19 vaccine monthly surveillance reports (week 39 2021 to week 14 2023) Data on the real-world effectiveness and impact of the COVID-19 vaccines. gov.uk

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Thread: The anti-science mRNA injection approval for children The so called “data” used to authorize the use of the covid injections in children should be a giant scandal and giving a child this should be a crime against humanity.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

It’s unjustifiable in every way and if that makes you upset, good because you should actually look at the documents and logic used to approve it. So how did they come to the conclusion to approve them and add them to the childhood schedule?

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Well, there was a risk benefit document released by Moderna 2 business days for the the VRBPAC meeting and another by Pfizer just 24 hours before the meeting. So the idea that the VRBPC members were able to read, analyze & interpret these assessments before meeting is laughable.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

How did they justify the approvals? Remember, children are very low risk from covid so the fact that they approved these mRNA injections for babies is an abomination and I’d argue gross negligence if not criminal.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Especially considering that we now know the majority of children have obtained natural immunity. So there is not a medical reason for this. However there are many monetary and legal reasons for it. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.04.12.21255275v3.full-text

Children develop robust and sustained cross-reactive spike-specific immune responses following SARS-CoV-2 infection medRxiv - The Preprint Server for Health Sciences medrxiv.org

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

They used something called “immunobridging” as the basis for approval NOT efficacy via RCT. No long term data, no control group, extremely small sample size, selective data poaching,no absolute risk reduction or even relative reduction estimate & breach of protocol after protocol

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Here is Eric Rubin the editor of the New England Journal of Medicine admitting they do not know if it works. https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxqWohAGPnl0KTos_qOnZ_FrFAcQGNJDYz

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Statnews also provided a succinct definition of Immunobridging. “Updated vaccines will be authorized for use based on small safety trials and what is known as immunobridging — comparing the antibody levels induced by the updated vaccines to those generated by earlier versions.”

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

“If they are similar, the assumption will be that antibody levels that protected against earlier versions of the virus will be protective again.” https://www.statnews.com/2022/06/27/fda-panel-to-advise-on-whether-and-how-covid-vaccines-should-be-updated/

FDA panel to advise on whether — and how — Covid vaccines should be updated The agency is seeking the advice of its panel of vaccine experts, the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee. statnews.com

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

I ask you this. Do you think that we should be basing the decision to authorize the use of mRNA injections in our children by using assumptions? This doesn’t sound like science to me, it sounds like the FDA has been captured by the pharmaceutical industry.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Just to drive this point home here is another short clip that I found that explains it pretty good. https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkx5lsMhVnab2p00p1owwoi_z2glQ0AVy8z

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Are you fine with this being the basis for injecting your children with experimental gene therapies, especially considering the following from the FDA’s own briefing document? https://www.fda.gov/media/159189/download

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Page 54 - “In the adolescent population 99.2% of vaccine recipients reported at least one adverse reaction after any injection with 25.3% reporting a reaction that was Grade 3 or higher.” 99% with 25% essentially unable to get out of bed to go to school the next day.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The pesky myocarditis issue Toby Rogers who has a fantastic substack linked below that points out how the FDA chose to get around the issue of myocarditis. He explains it as follows, straight from the FDA briefing document.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

“it’s all right there on pages 19 and 20. It’s one of the most chilling things I’ve ever read. The FDA’s argument goes like this:

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

“Yes, by spring and summer of 2021 there were already seven high quality studies from around the world showing that mRNA shots increase myocarditis risk. By fall of 2021, the reports continued to come in from the U.K., Europe, Canada, and Nordic countries…

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

showing a 2x to 7x increased risk of myocarditis from mRNA shots. Yes, the CDC’s own study of the Vaccine Safety Datalink showed a 2x higher risk of myocarditis from Moderna shots.”

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

“By May of 2022, we have additional studies from the U.K., Denmark, several Nordic countries, Italy, and France showing a 3x to 7x increased risk of myocarditis from the Moderna shot.”

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

“In all, the FDA cited TWENTY-SIX STUDIES showing that mRNA shots in general, and Moderna in particular, increase the risk of myocarditis.” https://tobyrogers.substack.com/p/the-sole-purpose-of-the-moderna-and?s=r

The sole purpose of the Moderna and Pfizer mRNA shots in kids is to eliminate the control group. There are no health benefits, only harms The FDA is willing to sacrifice the health of 19 million little kids to cover up the evidence of a crime tobyrogers.substack.com

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

I’ll put it like this, if you support the approval to give these to children, you are complicit in thousands of children’s hearts being destroyed and the deaths that come with that. And for what? To line the pockets of straight up criminals?

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Is a generation of children used as collateral damage worth it to you? This isn’t a debate, the science is clear but being ignored, there is zero reason to plunge an experimental injection into your children. It’s all risk with no reward.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Look around people, birth rates are plummeting worldwide. Taiwan one of the most vaccinated countries in the world at 91% had a 27% drop in birth rates in one year, a 26-sigma event. The chances of that happening by coincidence is the same as earth being hit by a giant asteroid.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/taiwan-birth-rate-cratered-2766-in

Taiwan: Birth Rate Dropped -27.66% in June 2022!!! Invasion? We do not need no stinking invasion igor-chudov.com

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Germany? 13% drop, again an astronomical number that doesn’t happen unless there is a reason. https://t.co/3PFjVJqPil

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

A graph laying out the US monthly birth rates in 2022 compared to 2021. https://t.co/imiVNKc1fo

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

These kind of drops do not happen for no reason, so you tell me what is going on here. These numbers cannot be blamed on COVID or the lockdowns but there is one giant variable that was introduced on a worldwide scale, around the time we see these declines happening everywhere.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

I haven’t even mentioned the tremendous increase in excess mortality in young people that is coinciding with the birth rate decline.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

A society that refuses to protect its children from obvious harm is a morally bankrupt one. Silence because of fear of social ostracism, ignorance due to fear of knowing and simple apathy is complete complicity.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

A child has no choice in the matter so shame on you if you decided to put your head in the sand. Get angry at me all you want, at least I can tell my kids that I didn’t cower in fear or plead ignorance when they find out how utterly pathetic our society was when they find out.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

I wanted to add this UK graph which I found in the new book. “Cause Unknown: The Epidemic of Sudden Death in 2021 and 2022” by #EdwardDowd. I think it says a lot. Sorry for the quality, it’s picture taken from the book. Cumulative % excess deaths 2021, per age group. https://t.co/CqVJe1zE0x

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

If they were so safe and effective, we wouldn’t see an increase in deaths in all age groups right?

@boriquagato - el gato malo

i found what i believe to be the best set of raw, age stratified all cause deaths data by vaccination status it shows that "ever vaxxed" was associated w/ 50-60% overall increase in all cause deaths in the UK by may 2022 this is a deeply worrying result https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/uk-age-stratified-all-cause-death

UK age stratified all cause death data shows higher deaths associated with covid vaccination at this point, this looks like about as clear a signal as one could find. release the rest of this data. boriquagato.substack.com

@boriquagato - el gato malo

higher all cause mortality was seen in all age groups and this relative risk rate was still rising in may when this series appears to have been discontinued. https://t.co/Yuzb2ncCH2

@boriquagato - el gato malo

based on this same data, VE vs covid death was rapidly declining (likely due to vaccine driven evolution to escape variants) but remained positive in may https://t.co/Ft38L23LPF

@boriquagato - el gato malo

this divergence from all cause deaths implies that either "covid deaths" are being miscounted/misattributed or that covid mortality benefit is being swamped by other forms of mortality. https://t.co/DyehOrjHH6

@boriquagato - el gato malo

because someone is sure to not read the piece and bring this up: https://t.co/k5kO1tyzqP

@boriquagato - el gato malo

continued promotion despite this negative mortality result & refusal to release raw data that clearly exists & is vital for real cost/benefit assessment leads to a pointy question: just who is “public health” protecting here? because it certainly does not seem like “the public” https://t.co/pBtbVNv04m

@boriquagato - el gato malo

i know people are going to want to jump in with ideas and criticisms and opinions and that's what twitter is for. all i ask is: please do actually read the substack first. it may answer/address your point.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

another look at UK all cause deaths by vaccination status, this time using their own ASMR data. once you consider the effect of a full series of covid vaxx, no age group sees benefit and many see serious harm. https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/another-look-at-uk-all-cause-mortality

another look at UK all cause mortality by vaxx status using the ASMR data to look at the full vaccine experience boriquagato.substack.com

@boriquagato - el gato malo

to look at this, one might presume that certain age bands see boosted +21 days look better than unvaxxed (50-79 males, 50-89 females) but this is a meaningfully incomplete picture

@boriquagato - el gato malo

because if there is one thing we know for sure, it's that all booster > 21 days ago folks were once boosted for < 21 days. and the data from that period shows it to be a time of severely elevated risk. (many age groups were non-evaluable because of the ONS data reporting std)

@boriquagato - el gato malo

and when we add that risk in on a blended fashion to get the full effect of the booster course, the benefit disappears and then some.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

when we add in the need to have at one time been double dosed as well, we start to see greatly elevated risk ratios.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

and that, i fear, is how we wind up here:

@boriquagato - el gato malo

methodology and data sources are linked in the substack. i'd be grateful if you'd read it before asking questions. https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/another-look-at-uk-all-cause-mortality

another look at UK all cause mortality by vaxx status using the ASMR data to look at the full vaccine experience boriquagato.substack.com

@timingnl - Timothy Robert

ClotShot jabbed will lose up to 25 years of their life expectancy, a bombshell new study revealed The average age of a ClotShot man goes down from 80 to 55 I made 3 Excess Mortality views for Italy, USA & Holland, to show the structural ClotShot impact https://slaynews.com/news/fully-vaxxed-lose-25-years-life-expectancy-study-shows/ https://slaynews.com/news/fully-vaxxed-lose-25-years-life-expectancy-study-shows/

Fully Vaxxed Lose 25 Years of Life Expectancy, Study Shows Those who have been fully vaccinated for COVID-19 with mRNA shots will lose 25 years of their life expectancy, a bombshell new study has revealed. slaynews.com

@timingnl - Timothy Robert

About the 5 years of excess mortality views: 2018 & 2019 normal fluctuations 2020 the initial Covid waves during the start, and during the winter, with deadly treatment protocols 2021 & 2022 show structural excess mortality with peaks after the ClotShot rounds

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

WHAT IS KILLING THE YOUNG PEOPLE IN UK? Please trust me when i tell you, you CAN understand this psychedelic chart and spending the time is worth it. This is the latest UK Non Covid Mortality stats to June 2023 It shows the EXCESS percentages of people dying from ??? over and above the usual rates of death... after all the covid deaths have been removed. So you cannot say "oh they are dying from covid" When you see a red square its telling you that deaths are EXCEEDING the norm by more than 5% Dark red squares by more than 10% Black squares by more than 15% Look at where all the black square "high die off" stats are... In 2022 - 23 not a single "high die off" stat in people above the age of 64 But in the under 64 years categories its mayhem ESPECIALLY in the youngest 0 - 24 age group. June 2023 in the 0 - 24 years female an EXCESS DEATH of nearly 21% May 2023 in the 0 - 24 males an EXCESS DEATH of 30% This the demographic that is the youngest and healthiest of the entire population. They are dying in their thousands from something that is not covid, and nobody is talking about it. No it's not a slack health care system - this is the demographic that does not usually end up in a hospital No it's not slow ambulances - this demographic need ambulances the least Is it the #covidvaccine ? Somebody needs to ask and answer the elephant in the room question Source data https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiYmUwNmFhMjYtNGZhYS00NDk2LWFlMTAtOTg0OGNhNmFiNGM0IiwidCI6ImVlNGUxNDk5LTRhMzUtNGIyZS1hZDQ3LTVmM2NmOWRlODY2NiIsImMiOjh9… #nz #mrna #uk #mrna #informedconsent

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

🚨🚨 The ONS has finally released the COVID-19 ‘Deaths by Vaccination Status Data’ for 2023 in England🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 8,330 deaths were #Vaccinated (95%) 436 deaths were #Unvaccinated (5%) And STILL our Government pretends the jag prevents death with COVID…💉 https://ons.gov.uk/releases/deathsinvolvingcovid19byvaccinationstatusenglanddeathsoccurringbetween1april2021and31may2023 1/

Deaths involving COVID-19 by vaccination status, England: deaths occurring between 1 April 2021 and 31 May 2023 - Office for National Statistics Age-standardised mortality rates for deaths involving coronavirus (COVID-19) by vaccination status, broken down by age group. Deaths occurring between 1 April 2021 and 31 May 2023 in England. ons.gov.uk

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

COVID-19 ‘Deaths by Vaccination Status Data’ England, 2023 #Unvaccinated 436 deaths 5% 1 dose 💉 62 deaths 0.7% 2 dose💉💉 334 deaths 3.8% 3 dose💉💉💉 1,032 deaths 11.8% 4 dose 💉💉💉💉 6,902 deaths 78.7% They say the vaccine protects against death from COVID? 2/ https://t.co/GyHqifJf9Z

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

The ‘Base Rate Fallacy’ crew will no doubt claim +95% of the population are vaccinated-they are not Actual vaccination rates across the adult population 18+ was confirmed from NHS vaccination records: 81.6% dose 1 78.7% dose 2 64.3% dose 3 9M #Unvaccinated Source: 🇬🇧UK HSA 3/ https://t.co/EIGKvFBg9j

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Monthly age-standardised mortality rates (ASMR) By vaccination status for all cause deaths, per 100,000 person-years, England 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Age 18-39 The #Unvaccinated had a lower rate of death than 4 dose vaccinated 💉💉💉💉 4/ https://t.co/uXrlkynZpA

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Monthly age-standardised mortality rates (ASMR) By vaccination status for all cause deaths, per 100,000 person-years, England 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Age 40-49 The #Unvaccinated had a lower rate of death than 4 dose vaccinated 💉💉💉💉 5/ https://t.co/vVORa2ikYx

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

ONS confirms 201,564 deaths to 31st May 2023 194,506 were vaccinated (96.5%) 7,058 were unvaccinated (3.5%) The unvaccinated make up 18% of the adult population, yet only 3.5% of all-cause deaths & just 5% of ‘COVID’ deaths.. So, what is causing all of the #ExcessDeaths? 6/ https://t.co/zBwxGt5HfE

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Can the Prime Minister or Health Secretary answer this simple question ??

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

The Spring BOOSTER campaign ran from March - September 2022 During that period, the Age-standardised mortality rate for the 4-dose vaccinated, was 1.55 x Higher than the #unvaccinated This should have made no difference to all-cause mortality rates, so why the increase? 7/ https://t.co/LtsSpwtO3y

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

https://x.com/freedompodcast1/status/1695080206673780744?s=46&t=2k68Z9IP1t_ir3J89yQoFg https://t.co/q8H3ZnOvjL

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Vaccination records from the NHS⬇️ 45M took Dose 1 43M took Dose 2 34M took Dose 3 (Booster) 22.5M took Dose 4+ The population of England is 57M Anyone saying 95% of the country took the vaccine is lying 9/ https://t.co/TvJbSj96G5

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

ONS admit their first error within the data Expect more This is what happens when data-sets are manipulated by hand, with unforeseen consequences popping up downstream ….. 10/ https://t.co/qPLj1kXt1O

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

ONS now confirming they will no longer be reporting ‘Death by Vaccination Status’ data … This is what happens when the data does not support their narrative They bury it If this data was positive for the vaccine, bet your life they’d be shouting it from the rooftops…📢 https://t.co/cU5hMreLlr

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Those 8,330 deaths are amongst 52,000 COVID deaths in the #Vaccinated since 1st April 2021 …. who’s fooling WHO here ….⬇️💥💥💥

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

💥 END GAME💥

@BanounHelene - Hélène Banoun

52 000 décès dus au COVID-19 parmi les #Vaccinated 8 850 décès dus au COVID-19 parmi les #Unvaccinated 1er avril 2021 - 31 mai 2023 Angleterre Je pensais qu'ils disaient que le vaccin arrêtait la mort due au COVID https://ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/deathsbyvaccinationstatusengland

Deaths by vaccination status, England - Office for National Statistics Age-standardised mortality rates for deaths involving coronavirus (COVID-19), non-COVID-19 deaths and all deaths by vaccination status, broken down by age group. ons.gov.uk

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

♦️52,000 COVID-19 deaths amongst the #Vaccinated 🔷 8,850 COVID-19 deaths amongst the #Unvaccinated 1st April 2021 - 31st May 2023 England 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 I thought they said the vaccine stopped death from COVID 🤷🏻‍♂️? Source: ONS (Table 5) https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/deathsbyvaccinationstatusengland

Deaths by vaccination status, England - Office for National Statistics Age-standardised mortality rates for deaths involving coronavirus (COVID-19), non-COVID-19 deaths and all deaths by vaccination status, broken down by age group. ons.gov.uk

@dksdata - David Dickson

SERIOUS Adverse Events Following Immunization (SAEFI). Newly published UK Data up to August 30th, 2023. SAFETY SIGNALS IGNORED WORLDWIDE SAEFI published by the UK Government MHRA Yellow Card system as of the end of August 2023. Before 2009: 1 in 100,000 was worrying. 2009/2010: 1 in 14,400 was a national emergency. 2021 and on for COVID vaccines. Between 1 in 87 and 1 in 108 is ignored. Over 1.65 MILLION Adverse Events (AE) have been reported in the UK alone. Of all AE reports, up to 90% are considered SERIOUS. Not just myocarditis, thrombocytopenia, and turbo cancers but almost 6,400 different event types that are unexplainable by any other cause. Some may appear insignificant or even ridiculous (such as pregnancy post-vaccine), but these are tracked for potential issues with contraindications with medicine or impacts on reproductive systems. In Canada, NACI falsely states there have been no reported pregnancy-related events ever recorded, while the UK has clearly documented 1,362 Pregnancy Conditions. 928 Spontaneous Abortions (not counted as deaths) and 31 other deaths, all post-COVID vaccine and with no other known cause. These reporting systems are designed to capture potential safety signals. As such, doctors have to show that any new event IS NOT VACCINE RELATED to exclude the event from reporting. Adverse Events must be reported by law in many countries, yet healthcare professionals have been discouraged from reporting (to the point of criminal neglect) in most places for the COVID vaccines specifically. Even before COVID, it was recognized that as much as 99% of AEFI have NOT been captured in these systems. This is most likely worse since COVID due to the pressure exerted on patients and healthcare professionals endorsed by complicit media and politicians. For more information on the latest SAEFI data from the UK Government (plus Canada, US and Australia) https://dksdata.com/ONSDATA For those still wondering about the overall impact of this, see the data on rising excess deaths in 2022 and 2023. England & Wales https://twitter.com/dksdata/status/1699061370615103676 Scotland https://twitter.com/dksdata/status/1699832665401356639 Canada https://twitter.com/dksdata/status/1691554364379525284 Sweden (not what you think) - Check 2020. https://twitter.com/dksdata/status/1688587835325255680?s=20… All https://dksdata.com/ExcessDeaths

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

🧵 THREAD: What was initially an observation is now measurable: young people are dying at unprecedented rates. @DowdEdward, a former BlackRock portfolio manager and data analyst, has highlighted a concerning surge in cardiovascular deaths in the UK—and the numbers are alarming.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#2 - Dowd’s opening slide illustrated adjusted cardiovascular death rates for people aged 15 to 44 in England and Wales. From 2010 to 2019, cardiovascular deaths in this age cohort declined in England and Wales, dropping 20% from 10 to 8 deaths per 100,000.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#3 - However, this once-declining trend has now reversed the other way. In 2020, there were about 2,000 cardiovascular deaths in people aged 15 to 44, 200 more than the 2015 to 2019 average.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#4 - But after the rollout of the COVID-19 vaccine in 2021, there were about 2300 cardiovascular deaths (500 more than the 2015 to 2019 average). And in 2022, 2,500 people aged 15 to 44 died from cardiovascular reasons (700 more than the 2015 to 2019 average).

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#5 - Dowd's next slides focused on excess deaths from cardiovascular disease in the 15 to 44 age group. Excess death rates from cardiovascular diseases rose by about 13% in 2020. But in 2021, cardiovascular deaths soared by 30% in 2021 and about 44% in 2022.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#6 - These numbers are what Dowd calls a “black swan event.” The excess mortality from cardiovascular deaths in 2021 and 2022 are highly abnormal, with Z-scores (standard deviations) of 7.5 and 10.5, respectively.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#7 - A three-standard deviation has a 0.3% chance of happening. But five-standard deviations and above have less than a 0.00001% chance of happening.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#8 - However, such anomalies occurred in both 2021 and 2022. “This is a signal it needs investigation. Something is off the rails,” stated Dowd.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#9 - While men and women had similar increases in heart-related deaths in 2020 and 2021, 2022 saw a shocking disparity. Men faced a staggering 56% deviation above the expected trend, double the 28% observed in women.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#10 - Dowd's final slide vividly illustrated the profound long-term impact on the population.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#11 - Dowd cited a study by Buergin and colleagues, which found that 2.8% of people suffered “vaccine-associated myocardial injury” after receiving the Moderna bivalent booster shot.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#12 - Using the 2.8% heart injury rate, Dowd applied that figure to the UK’s 15 to 44 population and concluded that as many as 650,000 UK citizens could have long-term heart damage.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#13 - But even if one assumes myocarditis is “mild” and has a 90% recovery rate, “That’s a 65,000-person market of individuals that could develop either disability or death down the line,” said Dowd.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#14 - Health authorities told you that COVID measures and “no jab, no job” vaccine mandates were about “saving lives.” However, according to Dowd and his team’s data, cardiovascular deaths are worse than ever — and nobody in a position of authority is talking about it.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#15 - Whatever the cause is, whether it’s the long-term effects of COVID, climate change, or the so-called COVID-19 vaccinations, it demands an immediate investigation. Considering that such an investigation is not even on their radar, we have to ask, why is that?

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The cardiovascular report Ed Dowd presented is available to read here: https://phinancetechnologies.com/HumanityProjects/Projects.htm

Humanity Projects - Projects phinancetechnologies.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

And @DowdEdward's full interview with @drdrew is available to watch via the video below: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVuh0a_M1gs

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DowdEdward @drdrew END - If you found this thread insightful, please do me (@VigilantFox) a favor and share this thread to reach those who need to hear this message most: And while you're here, check out these ten stories that the corporate media never told you.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DowdEdward @drdrew #10 - Cattle are being injected with mRNA “vaccines,” but one beef rancher is taking a stand. https://vigilantnews.com/post/beef-company-ceo-ill-shut-down-the-company-before-we-ship-a-single-bag-with-mrna-injected-meat

Beef Company CEO: “I’ll Shut Down the Company Before We Ship a Single Bag With mRNA-Injected Meat” mRNA-injected pork has been a thing since 2018. And beef is next on the agenda. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DowdEdward @drdrew #9 - Kari Lake makes a fiery accusation against Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky https://vigilantnews.com/post/kari-lake-makes-fiery-accusation-against-ukrainian-president-volodymyr-zelensky

Kari Lake Makes Fiery Accusation Against Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky Lake's riposte was swift and sharp. Her interpretation of Zelensky's comments was unmistakable. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DowdEdward @drdrew #8 - “Turbo cancers” are targeting young people — and it’s likely to get even worse. https://vigilantnews.com/post/top-doctor-explains-why-turbo-cancer-rates-are-likely-to-get-even-worse

Top Doctor Explains Why “Turbo Cancer” Rates Are Likely to Get Even Worse Top Doctor Explains Why “Turbo Cancer” Rates Are Likely to Get Even Worse vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DowdEdward @drdrew #7 - Top cardiologist breaks down four ways the COVID-19 shots injure and KILL. https://vigilantnews.com/post/dr-mccullough-testifies-the-truth-about-covid-19-mrna-shots-and-the-who-before-the-european-parliament

Dr. McCullough Testifies the Truth About COVID-19, mRNA Shots, and the WHO Before the European Parliament It's time to pull out from the World Health Organization. Dr. McCullough explains why. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DowdEdward @drdrew #6 - Ed Dowd makes a chilling prediction on how the COVID conspirators will cover up their crimes. https://vigilantnews.com/post/ed-dowd-makes-chilling-prediction-on-how-the-covid-conspirators-will-cover-up-their-crimes

Ed Dowd Makes Chilling Prediction on How the COVID Conspirators Will Cover Up Their Crimes To avoid accountability at all costs, the people in power need to retain power — even if it takes drastic measures. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DowdEdward @drdrew #5 - The CDC dropped a bombshell on itself, exposing an alarming risk/benefit ratio. https://vigilantnews.com/post/cdc-drops-a-bombshell-on-itself-exposes-alarming-risk-benefit-analysis

CDC Drops a Bombshell on Itself, Exposes Alarming Risk/Benefit Analysis How many serious adverse events are we causing per million doses? vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DowdEdward @drdrew #4 - Brave EU politician delivers an explosive message to the global tyrants. https://vigilantnews.com/post/go-to-hell-brave-eu-politician-delivers-damning-message-to-the-global-tyrants

‘Go to Hell’: Brave EU Politician Delivers Damning Message to the Global Tyrants “You belong behind bars. You may even rot in hell for all I care at this point because that's exactly what you deserve if you sell out the people.” vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DowdEdward @drdrew #3 - Oncologist unveils why fasting for 48+ hours is a potent therapy for COVID “vaccine” injuries. https://vigilantnews.com/post/vaccine-injury-treatment-fasting-for-48-72-hours-creates-autophagy-the-bodys-detox-process-that-kills-covid-19-vaccine-spike-protein-damaged-cells-and-reboots-the-immune-system

Vaccine Injury Treatment - Fasting for 48-72 hours creates autophagy - the body's detox process that kills COVID-19 vaccine spike protein damaged cells and reboots the immune system The benefits of fasting on COVID-19 vaccine injuries, are now being looked at seriously in the scientific literature. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DowdEdward @drdrew #2 - Fitness enthusiasts, not just athletes, are dying suddenly. https://vigilantnews.com/post/fitness-enthusiasts-are-dying-suddenly-16-sudden-deaths-examined

Fitness enthusiasts are dying suddenly - 16 sudden deaths examined Personal trainers, fitness instructors & influencers, jiu-jitsu, crossfit, gym goers - high risk of sudden death! vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DowdEdward @drdrew #1 - New-found emails prove Biden White House hid COVID Vaccine Harms from the public. https://vigilantnews.com/post/bombshell-new-found-emails-prove-biden-white-house-hid-covid-vaccine-harms-from-the-public

BOMBSHELL: New-Found Emails Prove Biden White House Hid COVID Vaccine Harms from the Public “Now we have the smoking gun.” vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DowdEdward @drdrew Two years ago, I never imagined that I would be reporting on the news every day. It's been a wild ride, and all your support has been incredible. I'm beyond grateful to take this next step with the website. Thank you all 🙏 And don't forget to give @VigilantNews a follow. https://t.co/eIt6qDAf4v

@USMortality - Ben

There is no scientific high quality evidence that the COVID-19 vaccines have saved any lives. On the contrary, they have demonstrably caused many deaths, much more than any other Pharma product in history, and also caused many - often permanent - injuries. Here’s the evidence: VACCINE Safety: - Serious Adverse Events (SAE) are estimated to be in a range of 1 in 800 to 1 in 5000: - https://bmj.com/content/378/bmj.o1731/rr-0 - https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X22010283 - https://twitter.com/hugh_mankind/status/1590733326553600003 - https://twitter.com/JulikaBrand/status/1550013097917747201 - COVID-19 vaccines have caused at least 254 confirmed deaths in Germany, as confirmed by the official death statistics of the federal statistics office: https://usmortality.substack.com/p/german-government-confirms-254-vaccine - No one knows how all-cause mortality would’ve looked like without vaccine, but the fact that mortality stayed high or increased in 2021/2022 is evidence that at least one of the words of ‘safe & effective’ cannot be true: - https://twitter.com/profnfenton/status/1596948154339196930 - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1701930193101721613 - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1592549814344241152 - VAERS shows a never-seen-before hockey stick increase with the introduction of the vaccines, that has not been explained by the health authorities. European data shows the same. - https://twitter.com/P_McCulloughMD/status/1712156115587223750 - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1407009199020658689 - https://twitter.com/JesslovesMJK/status/1707703130547540320 - VAERS shows that most death reports occur in the first 14 days. This is why people who died within two weeks of vaccination were likely considered unvaccinated. - https://twitter.com/goddeketal/status/1682008709067681792 - Young & Healthy: US data shows, that mortality rates increased after the vaccine rollout in all age groups 0-9, 10-19, 20-29: - https://mortality.watch/explorer/?c=USA&t=cmr&ct=yearly&ag=0-9&ag=10-19&ag=20-29&v=2… Efficacy: - None of the RCT Studies, except the Johnson & Johnson, showed a statistical significant effect on all-cause mortality. The mRNA vaccines has each +1 death in the vaccinated group. Novavax yielded +4 in the vaccinated group. Why J&J produced much fewer deaths, is a mystery as AstraZeneca, that used the same approach, had equal deaths in both groups. Also, the non-covid deaths are not balanced in the JJ trial results, pointing towards evidence of incorrect randomization of participants. - https://twitter.com/TracyBethHoeg/status/1512105790441607168 - Summary of the six authorized COVID-19 vaccines in US and EU. None of them were able to show statistical significance in regard to COVID-19 deaths or all-cause mortality (except JJ, as explained above) - not even in combination with 175 thousand test subjects. - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1577776630818283542 - Correlation DOES NOT EQUAL Causation: The Correlation between High Vaccinated and Low Mortality Countries, that the ‘Real Truther’ is describing, existed already before the vaccine rollout. If we look at before/after, no stat. Significant effect can be observed. - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1664118356725874690 - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1664043455801327616 - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1532100552535965697 - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1551149126364106754 - Higher unvaxed charts, are typically either confounded by general health status or manipulated via 14 day unvaccinated trick, lumping unknown vaccine status into the categories. My request to make the raw data public was denied, guess why? https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1579474197503700999 - There are many examples of jurisdictions, where excess mortality exploded, after the vast majority of the population was vaccinated: - https://x.com/USMortality/status/1689356018105688064 - Not remotely possible that the vaccines have saved many lives! Excess mortality in seniors has increased by another +112% after more than 80% had already been vaccinated: - https://x.com/USMortality/status/1709011271071527057?s=20… - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1464985828904554496 - There are many countries that do not have any stat. Significant excess deaths, namely Luxembourg in southern Italy, so how do you explain that no unvaccinated are dying en-masse there either? - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1703492850137075764 - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1709039967555707013 - There’s no stat. signifificant advantage visible when comparing the UK all-cause data by vaccination status. Often, the unvaccinated have even lower mortality rates: - https://twitter.com/TheRustler83/status/1708969809583501695 - Dr. Rancourt discovered, that excess deaths are mostly correlated with poverty levels, and the poorest suffer the most from the lockdowns, but likely also from vaccinations: - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1667403684798668800 COVID-19 correlation - There's a simple explanation as to why COVID-19 deaths typically track with excess deaths - but only in western/wealthy countries! Most western countries have incentivized coding seasonal respiratory illnesses as COVID-19 & also apply their own death certificate modeling on top of that, such as what CDC does with the NVSS/MMDS! - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1709325123910869088 - Wastewater surveillance cannot be used to establish the claim, that Covid-19 was novel or to assess levels of virus, because genetic material from multiple strains and persons are mixed or pooled together, and no data from before 2020 (as control of the method) is available. - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1709645502659330151 - The COVID-19 PCR test has never been clinically validated! In contrast, most people that tested positive in hospitals were incidentals, i.e. test positive, but actually are not sick with a respiratory illness, such as COVID-19: - https://twitter.com/FLSurgeonGen/status/1707115008927166706

@dksdata - David Dickson

🚨All Cause Deaths England & Wales Week 44🐘 The darker the red, the more deaths. Why is 2023 looking so bad AFTER a 'pandemic'? In 2020, the elderly died in Care Homes (NG163, Isolation, Ventilators...). In 2021, the vaccinated groups died (including the infants of vaccinated mothers). In 2022, vaccinations were pushed through mandates and other coercion, and the deaths expanded to those newly targeted. In 2023, death in every age group accelerates when they should be the lowest on record. The results of the response to COVID are clear - DEATH BY DESIGN. White Wash and Repeat - The World Over. More here: dksdata.com/ExcessDeaths

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

This is an official record of my Skype call to CDC Director of Media relations Ben Haynes notifying him that I have record-level data proving that the COVID vaccines are killing people. I offered the CDC the opportunity to view and authenticate the data.

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

If Ben ignores this offer, a jury might, in the future, find him guilty of criminal negligence. What would you do if you got a call like this?

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

See also this article: https://x.com/Smalling5Jerry/status/1727738873726337053?s=20

@Smalling5Jerry - Jerry Smalling

These researchers, in their own words: ‘…have found no evidence in [their] extensive research on ACM [All-deaths Cause Mortality] that Covid vaccines had any beneficial effect. If vaccines prevented transmission, infection or serious illness, then there should have been decreases in mortality following vaccine rollouts, not increases which were observed in every elderly group subject to rapid booster rollouts. And, mortality would not have increased solely when vaccines were rolled out, where no excess mortality occurred prior to vaccine rollouts, as we have documented in 9 countries across 3 continents.’ https://www.spectator.com.au/2023/11/excess-mortality-and-covid-vaccination-is-there-a-correlation/

Excess mortality and Covid vaccination: is there a correlation? | The Spectator Australia Since the introduction of Covid vaccines, the official narrative in Australia (and other parts of the world) is that these vaccines are safe, efficacious… spectator.com.au

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

The CDC shouldn't be ignoring this HUGE safety signal from the official UK ONS data published on their website. If you compare mortality for vaccinated and unvaccinated 80-year-olds, look who comes out ahead. Red means the vaccinated died at a higher rate.

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

Here's the source for that UK data: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/deathsbyvaccinationstatusengland Ben can't ignore that. It's official data, publicly available for download showing that that the vaxxed people had increased mortality over time vs. the unvaxxed who did not. This is the SAME PATTERN the record-level data I have showed.

Deaths by vaccination status, England - Office for National Statistics Age-standardised mortality rates for deaths involving coronavirus (COVID-19), non-COVID-19 deaths and all deaths by vaccination status, broken down by age group. ons.gov.uk

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

This is the email I just sent to Ben's personal gmail account notifying him of the phone message. The CDC blocks my emails, so I had to use his personal email. The email that was sent has the hyperlink inserted (this is a shot before I hit send).

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

Here's a screenshot with the Outlook timestamp on the sent message with the hyperlink. You can send Ben a reminder by emailing him at: media@cdc.gov

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

See also my earlier post about Ben: https://x.com/stkirsch/status/1727486339132870657?s=20

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

Meet Ben Haynes: Director of Media Relations for the CDC. I asked Ben if the CDC wanted to see the record level data that shows the COVID vaccines are killing people. His answer: "No." Got it. Are you feeling safer now? https://kirschsubstack.com/p/meet-ben-haynes-director-of-media?r=o7iqo&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Meet Ben Haynes: Director of Media Relations for the CDC I met Ben at CDC Headquarters in Georgia. Ben admitted to me that the CDC doesn't have record-level data for the COVID vaccines. And they don't want to see that data either. Now I know why. kirschsubstack.com

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

Alarming Data Unveiled: The Hidden Toll of Covid-19 on the Vaccinated in 2022 UK The data, striking in its implications, reveals a staggering reality: an overwhelming 92% of Covid-19 fatalities in 2022 were amongst the vaccinated. These figures paint a grim picture, with 9 out of every 10 Covid-19 deaths in England over the last two years tragically occurring in individuals who had received three or more doses of what is now being called a lethal vaccine. On February 21st, 2023, a hushed release from the Office for National Statistics (ONS), a branch of the UK Government, exposed data on deaths categorized by vaccination status in England until December 31st, 2022. The long-delayed report from ONS, titled “Deaths by Vaccination Status, England, 1 April 2021 to 31 December 2022,” sheds light on disturbing trends. In May 2021, the Covid death toll was at its lowest, with 205 fatalities among the vaccinated and a mere 84 among the unvaccinated. But as time surged forward, a horrifying increase of 450% in Covid deaths was observed in just a year, with 1,494 deaths among the vaccinated compared to only 96 among the unvaccinated. This raises an alarming question: Shouldn't we have seen a decline in deaths year over year if the Covid vaccines were effective? https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1732396819332657572?s=20 Contrarily, the data exposes a shocking truth: Covid deaths among the unvaccinated have dwindled to almost insignificance. In stark contrast, fatalities within the vaccinated populace have escalated alarmingly as time has progressed. https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1732386729804374068?s=20 For instance, between April 1st and December 31st, 2021, out of 17,150 Covid deaths, a staggering 13,116 were among the vaccinated, and only 4,034 among the unvaccinated. This equates to a shocking 76.5% of Covid deaths occurring among the vaccinated, while a mere 23.5% were among the unvaccinated. https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/uk-govt-admit-92-of-covid-deaths-were-from-triple-vaxxed/

UK Gov't Admit 92% of COVID Deaths Were From Triple Vaxxed The UK government has quietly admitted that the majority of COVID deaths are from people who received three or more mRNA vaccines for the virus. thepeoplesvoice.tv

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

Did Jacinda Ardern just order the Data to be deleted? Amidst a growing storm of controversy, there's escalating turmoil within the World Economic Forum and New Zealand's government circles. Panic appears to have set in as they desperately attempt to shut down any public access…

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

Breaking News: Korean Studies Reveal Startling Health Outcomes Post COVID-19 Vaccination Korean Studies Indicate What Our Governments are Hiding. In a groundbreaking revelation that's sending shockwaves through the global health community, Dr. Guy Hatchard sheds light on…

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

The disturbing news has been greeted with silence by the mainstream media, who apparently do not consider the deaths of more than one hundred thousand American children to be of any consequence. However, the latest data from the CDC has just been published by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OEC). The OEC is an intergovernmental organization with 38 member countries and it hosts a wealth of data on excess deaths, including data from the CDC that isn’t easily available to the American people. You can view the data for yourself here.

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

if the official narrative were true, that Covid injections are “safe and effective,” there wouldn’t be soaring increases in deaths among children and young adults in both 2021 and 2022. We know millions of Americans were coerced into getting the injections. And we know millions of parents were coerced into forcing their children to also get the same injections. The data provided by the CDC, which has been incredibly hard to find, only gives us clues as to this being the case with so many deaths among young Americans. However, further data published by the UK government confirms it. One of the pieces of evidence confirming this is a report published on the 6th of July 2022, by the UK’s Office for National Statistics (ONS), which is a UK government agency. Official UK government figures show the overwhelming number of people who died from Covid had received three or more shots of mRNA vaccines for the virus. The UK government quietly released the official figures for Covid deaths in 2022. The data reveals that the triple+ vaccinated population accounted for 92% of Covid-19 deaths throughout the entirety of 2022. The figures also show that 9 in every 10 Covid deaths in England over the past two years had received three or more of the shots.

@EthicalSkeptic - Ethical Skeptic ☀

Yes, we documented how this scam worked when it was published by the CDC as well. The hospital network sample took MCoD Covid deaths, with no vaccination records (most) and assigned those to 'unvaccinated deaths'. https://t.co/jGBzdTYxrr

@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd

🧵 THREAD: This might shake the world. The #1 chart used to promote the COVID vaccine is this one. It leads you to believe ‘Unvaccinated’ people are more likely to die from COVID-19. This is VERY misleading though, and not for the reasons you might think. Read on… https://t.co/avSF25ZMtz

@sco0psmcgoo - Scoops McGoo

BREAKING: the New Zealand government today released gross mortality statistics by covid vax dose (including unvaccinated) under Official Information Act request Combined with @BarryYoungNZ's leaked data, we now see mortality in each dose group (including 0 doses) #StoptheShots!

@sco0psmcgoo - Scoops McGoo

Spreadsheet https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1BwtabtrYjvSfAKlI3o_OTUlgPN_NrzCXTsPM_QT6gKI/ Mortality-by-dose-by-month (OIA request) https://fyi.org.nz/request/25021-number-of-covid19-vax-deaths-by-age-band-location-and-month#incoming-96520 NZ Stats (official metrics) https://infoshare.stats.govt.nz Min. Health git repo (for deducing unvaxxed group size from cumulative first-dose-by-date data) https://github.com/minhealthnz/nz-covid-data/

Page Not Found Web word processing, presentations and spreadsheets docs.google.com

Number of COVID19 vax deaths by age band, location and month - a Official Information Act request to Ministry of Health Can you please provide a count of the number of people vaccinated against COVID19 funded by the government of NZ and those who subsequently died of any cause - as measured by MoH record level patient or payment databases. Please provide this as a machine readable CSV file. Dataset 1 - Vaccinations The following breakdown of each column is required: 1) Month of vaccination - from the first vaccination until the end of Nov 2023 2) Vaccination number (eg 1=1st, 2=2nd, 3=1st booster, 4=2nd booster etc) using a coding scheme used within the MoH 3) Location - Territorial Local Authority (ie Council area) based grouped into The following categories: Auckland, Greater Wellington (incld Wairarapa), Christchurch, Dunedin, Rest of South Island, Lower North Island (including Taranaki and Gisborne but excluding Taupo and King Country), Uppoer Nirth Island. Ideally this is the physical vaccinating provider paid. Ideally derived from the location the injection was given (eg Rest Home for a mobile clinic - which is possible because the address of the patient’s NHI number will be the rest home, or the physical address of a physical site like a pharmacy/GP clinic). 4) Age Band of Patient - <19 years old inclusive, 20-39 inclusive, 40-59 inclusive, 60-74 inclusive, 75+ inclusive 5) Intentionally blank - null 6) Death Last Dose - <30 days inclusive, 31 days-90 days inclusive, 91-180 days, 181 days to 365 days, 366 days to 730 days inclusive, 731 to 1095 days inclusive, over 1096 days inclusive. Each of these categories should be calculated from the date of the patients’s most recent vaccine and a suffix appended depending upon the number of their last vaccine (eg “<30_5” would be coded against a patient who died within 30 days of their 5th jab/3rd booster 7) Intentionally blank - null 8) The count of the number of vaccination injections in each of the categories above when the underlying dataset has a Group By query applied using Count(Distinct NHI_Number) or similar for this column. 9) The count of the number of people who subsequently died after the vaccination month in each of the categories above when the underlying dataset has a Group By query applied using Count(Distinct NHI_Number) or similar for this column. So for example, a group of 1000 70 year old people who were injected in June 2023 with their 3rd injection where 7 people died after 4 months (in Oct 2023) after visiting an ER would appear in a record like the following: 202307, 3, “Auckland”, “60-74”,”>null_1”, “91-180_3”, “null”, 1000, “7” Similarly there be no recorded deaths for 366 days and over because this is in the future after this dataset is being summarised. If there were 1234 1st injections and no deaths within 30 days of Feb 2022 for teenagers, but 3 / 345 within 2 months and 10 / 456 in month 4 then the records might look like: 202202, 1, Dunedin, “<19”, “null”, “<30_1”, “N”, 1234, “0” 202202, 1, Dunedin, “<19”, “null”, “31-90_1”, “null”, 345, “S” (see below re use of “S”) 202202, 1, Dunedin, “<19”, “null”, “91_180_1”,“null”, 456, “10” Dataset 2 - Benchmark Total Vaccinations and Deaths The following breakdown of each column is required: 1) Month of vaccination - from the first vaccination until the end of Nov 2023 2) Vaccination number (eg 1=1st, 2=2nd, 3=1st booster, 4=2nd booster etc) using a coding scheme used within the MoH 3) Intentionally blank - null 4) Age Band of Patient - <19 years old inclusive, 20-39 inclusive, 40-59 inclusive, 60-74 inclusive, 75+ inclusive 5) Death First Dose - <30 days inclusive, 31 days-90 days inclusive, 91-180 days, 181 days to 365 days, 366 days to 730 days inclusive, 731 to 1095 days inclusive, over 1096 days inclusive. Each of these categories should be calculated from the date of the patients’s first injection and a suffix “_1” appended 6) Death Last Dose - <30 days inclusive, 31 days-90 days inclusive, 91-180 days, 181 days to 365 days, 366 days to 730 days inclusive, 731 to 1095 days inclusive, over 1096 days inclusive. Each of these categories should be calculated from the date of the patients’s most recent vaccine and a suffix appended depending upon the number of their last vaccine (eg “<30_5” would be coded against a patient who died within 30 days of their 5th jab/3rd booster) 7) ER Visit - a “E” if the patient visited a hospital Emergency Room for any reason between their last injection and their date of death inclusive. Otherwise “N”. 8) The count of the number of vaccination injections in each of the categories above when the underlying dataset has a Group By query applied using Count(Distinct NHI_Number) or similar for this column. 9) The count of the number of people who subsequently died after the vaccination month in each of the categories above when the underlying dataset has a Group By query applied using Count(Distinct NHI_Number) or similar for this column. Dataset 3 - Control Group For anyone in the NHI dataset who is NOT in the COVID Vax Pay per Dose database but is enrolled with a GP Practice in NZ, please produce the following dataset. The following breakdown of each column is required: 1) Date of 1st COVID19 injection in NZ - this will be the same value for each row 2) Vaccination number - 0 - the same for all rows 4) Age Band of Patient - <19 years old inclusive, 20-39 inclusive, 40-59 inclusive, 60-74 inclusive, 75+ inclusive 5) Death Period - <30 days inclusive, 31 days-90 days inclusive, 91-180 days, 181 days to 365 days, 366 days to 730 days inclusive, 731 to 1095 days inclusive, over 1096 days inclusive. Each of these categories should be calculated from the date in column (1) of this dataset and a suffix “_0” appended 8) Size of Control at start - The count of the number of people in each of the categories above when the underlying dataset has a Group By query applied using Count(Distinct NHI_Number) or similar for this column. 9) Death count - The count of the number of people who subsequently died after the date in column (1) in each of the categories above when the underlying dataset has a Group By query applied using Count(Distinct NHI_Number) or similar for this column. For all Datasets please provide a list of codes used and descriptions, and a description of the file format. A Reasonable OIA with Precedent This OIA should be possible by using simple queries on the entire datasets of COVID Vax Pay per Dose and National Minimum Dataset of Hospital data - matched using the NHI number. My understanding is the Pay Per Dose dataset is about 12m records. This OIA does not ask for the creation of any information, just the aggregation of a data set the MoH already collects as a normal course of its business. This OIA does not seek any personal or commercial information about patients or suppliers. Where a cell count in column (7) or (8) is less than 5 please mark as “S”. Where a cell count in column (7) is truely zero this should not occur in the dataset. I am a NZ citizen, resident and taxpayer and am entitled to use the OIA. There is precedent for the MoH answering previous data requests of this type as per this one: https://fyi.org.nz/request/12581-deaths-in-aged-care-residential-facilities-5-years-of-monthly-data Ways of Working Under the OIA the MoH is obliged to consult with me if there are any questions or where there may be a way for me to simplify the request so that it is reasonable. This must be done before refusing no matter what your belief is because you do not understand my purpose and what trade offs are possible. However I put it to you ahead of time that it would take a competent SQL developer + checking the numbers a shorter/similar amount of time than if I requested any relevant documents/emails and they all had to be reviewed for redaction. Please provide contact details if you want to talk through any questions and then we will document the outcome in writing through this channel. We have used this method before at the request of the Ombudsman so it would seem like a good way to assist the MoH to meet its KPIs for OIAs. Please raise any questions ASAP and do not leave it until near the end of the 20 working day period to respond. Yours faithfully, Chris Johnston fyi.org.nz

Browse - Infoshare - Statistics New Zealand Infoshare: Connecting you to a wealth of information. A free service provided by Statistics New Zealand to allow viewing our survey data. infoshare.stats.govt.nz

GitHub - minhealthnz/nz-covid-data: COVID-19 data for New Zealand COVID-19 data for New Zealand. Contribute to minhealthnz/nz-covid-data development by creating an account on GitHub. github.com

@sco0psmcgoo - Scoops McGoo

https://t.co/0rEFgEmM58

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

BREAKING: Official NZ mortality data released under FOIA request shows that initial spike in deaths happened right after initial vaccine rollout and BEFORE COVID. Second spike happened after shot 3 rollout. Excess deaths were NOT driven by the unvaccinated.

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

Also, NZ officials admitted that vaccinated people are more likely to have excess mortality:

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

Was this because people with multiple comorbidities sought to be vaccinated? No. The time series analysis on the data released by @BarryYoungNZ shows mortality rates INCREASED after people got the shots. It was the shots themselves that caused this increase.

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

I've updated the New Zealand repository with the FOIA documents and the pivot table analysis of the FOIA data which is where the chart was from. See the FOIA responses directory and subdirectory. Credentials to access the repository are in this article: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/data-from-us-medicare-and-the-new

Data from Health New Zealand confirms that the COVID vaccines have killed over 10 million worldwide It's finally here: record-level data showing vaccine timing and death date. There is no confusion any longer: the vaccines are unsafe and have killed, on average, around 1 person per 1,000 doses. kirschsubstack.com

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

New Zealand epidemiologists are silent on this data. They cannot explain it. Vaccines were supposed to reduce all-cause mortality, but the all-cause mortality reached new highs in 2022. They cannot claim it is the shifting age mix because the ACM decreased in 2023. None of their "explanations" fit the data. The only explanation that fits the observed data is that the vaccines drove the clear increase in all-cause mortality.

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

Ben @USMortality found the same thing; the steep rise in deaths were caused by the vaccinated. https://t.co/hO5Kqrdqte

@USMortality - Ben

💥💥💥 The latest official New Zealand FOIA data of All-Cause Mortality by COVID-19 vaccination status & age, shows that the vaccinated are the driver of all-cause excess mortality! Clearly, unvaccinated deaths did not account for any major spikes in excess mortality!

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

Is there an epidemiologist in the world who is willing to state that the New Zealand data shows the vaccines are safe? Name one.

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

If the vaccine worked, then you'd have seen a HUGE spike in July 2022 for the unvaxxed. There were 596 COVID deaths which was the single highest peak in NZ. The unvaxxed should have spiked, but vaccinated wouldn't have spiked at all. But there is no such spike for the unvaxxed who should have borne the brunt of the COVID deaths if the vaccine worked. This is a MAJOR PROBLEM for the health authorities. The vaccine did NOTHING to protect against COVID deaths. It couldn't be more clear.

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

The bottom line is that this new NZ OIA data shows very clearly that they lied to us. The COVID vaccine did NOT protect the vaccinated from COVID deaths at all. And the time series data computed from the data released by @BarryYoungNZ shows that mortality rates increased in people after they got the shots. It is unmistakable. This is why I cannot even pay an epidemiologist to debate me publicly on this. Nobody wants to lose their job.

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

Alert: England’s vaccinated population had close to one million deaths in 23 months; unvaccinated population had less than 61,000 deaths over the same period Shocking data released by the U.K. government shows that over the past two years, the vaccinated population in England has suffered an outrageous number of deaths compared to the unvaccinated population, even though approximately 30 percent of the population has not even had a single dose of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine. According to the U.K. Health Security Agency (UKHSA), by July 2022, 18.9 million people had refused the first dose of the COVID-19 injection, 21.5 million people had refused the second dose of the COVID-19 injection, alongside 2.6 million people who had received the first dose but refused the second, and 30.4 million people had refused the third dose of the COVID-19 injection, alongside 8.9 million people who had received the second dose but refused the third. (Related: CAUGHT: UK hospitals certified pneumonia deaths as COVID deaths to create illusion of pandemic.) According to the UKHSA's figures, 63.4 million people were eligible for vaccination at that point. Therefore, as of July 2022, 30 percent of England's population remained completely unvaccinated; 34 percent was not double vaccinated; and 50 percent was not triple vaccinated. However, the vaccinated population as a whole accounted for 95 percent of all COVID-19 deaths between January and May 2023, while the unvaccinated population accounted for just five percent. But it's the fact that these deaths aren't among the one-dose and two-dose vaccinated population that is truly horrifying. The vast majority are among those vaccinated four times, with this population accounting for 80 percent of all COVID-19 deaths, and 83 percent of all COVID-19 deaths among the vaccinated. #VaccineInjuries #mRNA #DiedSuddenly #ExcessDaeths #UK https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-03-01-england-million-vaccinated-deaths-61000-unvaccinated-deaths.html

DATA: England’s vaccinated population had close to one million deaths in 23 months; unvaccinated population had less than 61,000 deaths over the same period – NaturalNews.com Shocking data released by the U.K. government shows that over the past two years, the vaccinated population in England has suffered an outrageous number of deaths compared to the unvaccinated population, even though approximately 30 percent of the population has not even had a single dose of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine. According to the […] naturalnews.com

@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley

“Young people who received multiple COVID-19 jabs were significantly more likely to die than those who skipped the shots, according to data from the U.K.’s Office for National Statistics(ONS). The data include deaths by vaccination status from April 1, 2021, to May 31, 2023, when the COVID-19 shot campaign was in full effect. When The Exposé analyzed the data, they revealed the disturbing finding that those with the most COVID-19 shots fared the worst: “Our analysis focused on mortality rates per 100,000 person-years from January to May 2023 among residents in England aged 18 to 39, and what we found is truly shocking. “Initial observations of the data prove that individuals in this age bracket who had received four doses of a COVID-19 vaccine exhibited higher mortality rates compared to their unvaccinated counterparts.” Mortality rate 318% higher among quadruple-jabbed youth

@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/multiple-covid-shots-higher-mortality-rates-cola/

Multiple COVID Shots Linked to Higher Mortality Rates in 18- to 39-Year-Olds Young people who received multiple COVID-19 jabs were significantly more likely to die than those who skipped the shots, according to data from the U.K.’s Office for National Statistics. childrenshealthdefense.org

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

It has become almost impossible to die in this country without first being injected. No longer is the priest by the bed side reading last rites, it's the vaccinator. I will explain below. 🧵

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

The graph shows the percentage of adult deaths in England that were vaccinated https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/deaths_in_nims_database#incoming-2653782 out of total deaths in England. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/adhocs/1343dailydeathsbydateofoccurrence1stjune2014to31stmay2023bysingleyearofageengland

Deaths in NIMS database - a Freedom of Information request to UK Health Security Agency I am rewording a previous request: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/death_data_for_vaccinated_popula Please can you provide data on people who are no longer included in the published NIMS database but are held by you because they died prior to the latest publication but after December 2020. This request is only for adults over the age of 20 and the age information can be given in the categories used in the NIMS dataset to ensure anonymity. Please provide the following data for people who have been removed after death since December 2020: 1. Age at first dose 2. Date of each dose of covid vaccine that they were given 3. Date of death In order to make the dates of death anonymous please do the following. For each data of death add a value to the date randomly selected from this range (-3, -2, -1, +1, 2, 3). It will then be impossible to determine who the record relates to. I would like to draw you attention to the decision of the House of Lords in Common Services Agency v Scottish Information Commissioner, in which it was ruled that "barnardisation" of data did not amount to the creation of new information. Although the case technically arose under Scottish law, there is no reason why it would not also apply in England - given the similarity in wording between the two pieces of legislation (FOIA and FOISA): https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldjudgmt/jd080709/comm-1.htm Yours faithfully, Dr Clare Craig whatdotheyknow.com

Daily deaths by date of occurrence, 1st June 2014 to 31st May 2023 by single year of age, England - Office for National Statistics ons.gov.uk

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

From 2022, there were more covid deaths in the vaccinated with omicron - but I don't think that is what accounts for this. This is all cause deaths - which had settled into a predictable pattern in summer 2021.

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

Even if the vaccinated died more, the unvaccinated should still be dying! How can there be half the deaths in the unvaccinated in July 2022 compared to July 2021? By Autumn it was only a quarter.

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

In summer 2021 the unvaccinated seem to have been left alone. But in 2022, as well as the vaccinated dying more, it looks like those susceptible to death had been injected before dying. Same as first graph with zoomed in y-axis showing percentage of deaths in vaccinated.

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

Vaccinating the dying makes interpretation of any data on deaths almost impossible. Looking at sudden deaths only might help. In the meantime, there are several points we do know that indicate the vaccines caused deaths.

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

There was a stepwise increase in calls to ambulances for life threatening emergencies that happened with the rollout. There was no rise before. There was no rise after.

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

Here's the stepwise change in ambulance calls for life threatening conditions. It happened after vaccine rollout. It was worse in winter but has not returned to baseline since. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7281/CBP-7281.pdf

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

After vaccination, during the Delta wave, more heavily vaccinated regions had a lower mortality. https://hartuk.substack.com/p/country-comparison-of-deaths?utm_source=publication-search

Comparison of European deaths More vaccinated countries have had more recent death The extent of vaccination between different countries is strongly correlated to how many deaths they have experienced both at the end of 2021 and in more recent months. More vaccinated countries saw lower excess mortality during the Delta wave but the opposite has been true in recent months. Is this a sign of a causal relationship or are there other factors at play? hartuk.substack.com

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

However, this was also true BEFORE a single injection was given, suggesting it was due to confounders. https://hartuk.substack.com/p/picture-tells-a-thousand-words?utm_source=publication-search

A picture tells a thousand words: or does it? More data lies try to prop up crumbling narrative This rather beautiful graph was recently tweeted by @EthicalSkeptic. Some key information from it has been obscured for now to assist with making a particular point. The graph shows the Covid death rate (ie total Covid-labeled deaths per 100k population during the period covered) by county across the USA on the vertical axis, and the % vaccination rate (as at 25 May 2022) on the horizontal axis. hartuk.substack.com

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

The same was true for excess deaths as well as covid deaths.

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

@thatsnotmine125 Here is the same graph built from scratch. Feel free to do it yourself though.

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

With Omicron, the confounders were overrun and the relationship reversed. https://hartuk.substack.com/p/country-comparison-of-deaths?utm_source=publication-search

Comparison of European deaths More vaccinated countries have had more recent death The extent of vaccination between different countries is strongly correlated to how many deaths they have experienced both at the end of 2021 and in more recent months. More vaccinated countries saw lower excess mortality during the Delta wave but the opposite has been true in recent months. Is this a sign of a causal relationship or are there other factors at play? hartuk.substack.com

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

At the same time as the rise in mortality, there was a rise in disabilities of people of working age. This happened from spring 2021 in the UK: https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peoplenotinwork/economicinactivity/datasets/economicinactivitybyreasonseasonallyadjustedinac01sa

INAC01 SA: Economic inactivity by reason (seasonally adjusted) - Office for National Statistics Economic inactivity (aged 16 to 64 years ) by reason (seasonally adjusted). These estimates are sourced from the Labour Force Survey, a survey of households. These are official statistics in development. ons.gov.uk

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

And in the USA: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=QaRH

Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items in U.S. City Average | FRED | St. Louis Fed Graph and download economic data for Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items in U.S. City Average from 1947 to 2024 about headline figure, average, all items, urban, consumer, CPI, inflation, price index, indexes, price, USA, labor underutilization, civilian, 16 years +, labor, household survey, unemployment, and rate. fred.stlouisfed.org

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

It is these big picture measures that tell the story. It would be icing on the cake to have the detailed data too - and I will keep trying to get it - but I am not sure we have it yet.

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

csv file from UKHSA will download if you click here https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/deaths_in_nims_database/response/2653782/attach/4/Covid19VAccineDataForThoseWithADeathRecordv5.csv

Deaths in NIMS database - a Freedom of Information request to UK Health Security Agency I am rewording a previous request: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/death_data_for_vaccinated_popula Please can you provide data on people who are no longer included in the published NIMS database but are held by you because they died prior to the latest publication but after December 2020. This request is only for adults over the age of 20 and the age information can be given in the categories used in the NIMS dataset to ensure anonymity. Please provide the following data for people who have been removed after death since December 2020: 1. Age at first dose 2. Date of each dose of covid vaccine that they were given 3. Date of death In order to make the dates of death anonymous please do the following. For each data of death add a value to the date randomly selected from this range (-3, -2, -1, +1, 2, 3). It will then be impossible to determine who the record relates to. I would like to draw you attention to the decision of the House of Lords in Common Services Agency v Scottish Information Commissioner, in which it was ruled that "barnardisation" of data did not amount to the creation of new information. Although the case technically arose under Scottish law, there is no reason why it would not also apply in England - given the similarity in wording between the two pieces of legislation (FOIA and FOISA): https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldjudgmt/jd080709/comm-1.htm Yours faithfully, Dr Clare Craig whatdotheyknow.com

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

@threadreaderapp please unroll

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

YOUNG PEOPLE DYING AT CATASTROPHIC RATES IN NORWAY... This chart shows the increase in Excess Mortality for people aged 15 to 24 in Norway. The solid blue lines indicate the rise in excess mortality The dark blue line shows the cumulative level of Covid vaccination over time, for this age group. In 2023 Excess Mortality for this previously healthy, robust age demographic was MORE THAN 60% ELEVATED Why? Is this the slowly evolving impact of mRNA injection? Norway was a highly mRNA injected population. Under 18's all received Pfizer mRNA. Over 18's chose from Pfizer or Moderna (link in comments) #nzcovidinquiry2

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd

We don’t have exactly that age range but statement likely true. https://phinancetechnologies.com/HumanityProjects/yearly%20Excess%20Death%20Rate%20Analysis%20-%20Eurostat.htm

EU - Yearly Excess Death Rate Analysis phinancetechnologies.com

@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”

Individuals who have received four doses of Covid-19 mRNA vaccines are dying in unprecedented numbers according to official UK government data which reveals that four-doses vaccinated young adults are 318% more likely to die than their unvaccinated peers. https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/uk-govt-data-reveals-staggering-death-surge-in-four-dose-covid-vaccinated-cohort/

UK Gov’t Data Reveals 'Staggering' Death Surge in Four-Dose COVID-Vaccinated Cohort Individuals who have received four doses of Covid-19 mRNA vaccines are dying in unprecedented numbers according to official UK government data. thepeoplesvoice.tv

@A1an_M - Alan

During the coronapanic it was routine for those of us in the sceptic camp to be attacked online for being conspiracy theorists and for us to be pestered by the Big Pharma apologists to provide "references" to prove our points (as well as being censored and cancelled by people working for our own government). No reference was ever good enough for them of course, but during that time I built up a huge archive of impeccably sourced information pointing directly to the whole thing being a massive scam. Where possible I'd go back and analyse the source data, rather than rely on a newspaper article or some third-hand commentator. I thought I'd collect together the top few pieces of evidence and put them in a thread here for future reference in an attempt to make sure the whole thing doesn't get brushed under the carpet under the banner of "It was all Tony Fauci's fault for doing gain of function research". The scandal is so much bigger and wider than that. So here it is 🧵: 1/10

@A1an_M - Alan

Item 1 - Prof John Ioannidis estimates of the Infection Fatality Rate of COVID. John Ioannidis, world-leading epidemiologist from Stanford (or he was at that time, his name was soon dragged through the mud), used seroprevalence data (indicating how many people had been exposed to SARS-COV-2) from studies around the world (32 different locations) to estimate the infection fatality rate of COVID-19 (how many people will die on average in a group of people infected with the virus). He concluded that the median infection fatality rate was 0.27% and that for people under 70, the median was 0.05% (1 in 2,000), showing that the virus was overwhelmingly a risk only to the elderly and even then, little more of a risk than seasonal influenza. (As a comparison, the IFR of seasonal influenza is about 1 in 1,000 (0.1%) across all age groups). These rates (from the real world) were far lower than those used in Imperial College modelling and quoted in the media by politicians. An early indication that the whole thing was being overblown. And these estimates were produced very early on in the "pandemic" before the virus had mutated to become even less deadly. Ioannidis study: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.13.20101253v3 2/10

The infection fatality rate of COVID-19 inferred from seroprevalence data medRxiv - The Preprint Server for Health Sciences medrxiv.org

@A1an_M - Alan

Item 2 - the Diamond Princess Cruise Ship Further evidence that SARS-COV-2 was primarily a threat only to the very elderly was provided by the outcomes for passengers on the Diamond Princess cruise ship. A passenger who had been on the ship and disembarked in Hong Kong subsequently tested positive for COVID-19 and, as a result, the ship was quarantined and passengers and crew stayed on board rather than disembarking in Japan. This gave an opportunity to study the behaviour of the virus in a real life "petri-dish" with thousands of people in close proximity being exposed to the virus. There were 3,711 passengers and crew on the Diamond Princess. Median age 58. Everyone on board had a PCR test (eventually) 619 out of 3,711 tested positive (17%), of whom 301 had symptoms and 318 had no symptoms. There were 7 deaths (6 in the 70-79 age group, 1 in the over 80 age group). So even in a very elderly cohort of people, whom we must assume were all exposed to the virus, only 0.18% of people died. We could also infer that there must have been existing immunity to the virus in this population, given how few tested positive, and how few of those developed symptoms. Link to study: https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.12.2000256 Link to Daily Sceptic analysis: https://dailysceptic.org/2021/03/27/the-diamond-princess-told-us-about-pre-existing-immunity-asymptomatic-infection-and-the-infection-fatality-rate-why-were-those-lessons-ignored/ 3/10

Eurosurveillance | Page Not Found eurosurveillance.org is the online home of Eurosurveillance, Europe's journal on infectious disease surveillance, epidemiology, prevention and control. eurosurveillance.org

The Diamond Princess Told Us About Pre-Existing Immunity, Asymptomatic Infection and the Infection Fatality Rate. Why Were Those Lessons Ignored? – The Daily Sceptic The virus raged on the Diamond Princess cruise ship in February 2020, but only 17% of passengers tested positive, suggesting high levels of pre-existing immunity. Why was that lesson ignored by the modellers? dailysceptic.org

@A1an_M - Alan

Item 3 - ONS data from Freedom of Information requests ONS data gradually became more and more politicised during the coronapanic, and therefore less and less useful, but the data it gave in response to FOI requests in 2020 was actually quite useful. For example this analysis of the age breakdown of those who died following a positive COVID test in 2020 in England and Wales. It showed once again the extent to which this virus was primarily a threat to the very elderly, with 84% of victims over the age of 70 (and also, only 9 victims under the age of 15). Again, consistent with the earlier Ioannidis analysis. Other FOI requests revealed that the mean age of those who died with COVID was over 80, and that, of the 80,000+ deaths recorded "with COVID" in 2020, only 9,000 listed COVID as the sole cause of death on the death certificate - the overwhelming majority of deaths involved at least one other comorbidity. This data also made it possible to compare the age distribution of deaths with COVID in 2020, with deaths from all causes in 2019, and this analysis revealed that if you were under the age of 75, you were more likely to die of any cause, than with COVID. So these three analyses showed that, from an early date, it was clear that SARS-COV-2 was not the deadly threat to everyone it was portrayed to be. ONS FOI links: https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/deathsfromcovid19byageband https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/averageageofthosewhohaddiedwithcovid19 https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/deathsfromcovid19withnootherunderlyingcauses 4/10

Deaths from COVID-19 by age band - Office for National Statistics ons.gov.uk

Average age of those who had died with COVID-19 - Office for National Statistics ons.gov.uk

Deaths from COVID-19 with no other underlying causes - Office for National Statistics ons.gov.uk

@A1an_M - Alan

Item 4 - Mask Ineffectiveness In July 2020 there was a sudden turnaround in recommendations for mask wearing amongst the general population. Prior to this date, there had been a consensus that this was neither necessary nor desirable. But suddenly that all changed. The science hadn't changed, there was a randomly controlled trial conducted in Denmark in April/May 2020 which found no statistically significant difference in infections between mask-wearing and non-mask wearing groups. And subsequent studies reviewed by the Cochrane Library found the same. But what had changed was "political lobbying" with the WHO to change their guidance on masks, as the BBC revealed in a rare outbreak of COVID investigative journalism by them (youtube link below). Denmark masks study: https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/m20-6817 BBC Newsnight clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnRqUMxjvR4 5/10

@A1an_M - Alan

Item 5 - Vaccine ineffectiveness There were plenty of signs that the COVID vaccines were not effective in preventing infection, or transmission, or hospitalisation, or death with COVID, at a population level, just by comparing the rates before and after the introduction of the vaccines. The vaccine introduction in mid December 2020 coincided with an uptick in all of these variables. (What changed the trend was the appearance of the omicron variant which Bill Gates dolefully described as "a type of vaccine" which had done a better job of reaching the whole population than the vaccinators). But a study in the International Journal of Epidemiology gave evidence of something which we all observed anecdotally all around us: that vaccinated people were still becoming infected with the virus. The study found that after two doses of the Astra Zeneca vaccine or one dose of the Pfizer vaccine, that whatever immunity the vaccines delivered against the virus quickly waned and actually turned negative within 2-3 months (meaning recipients were more likely to be infected or hospitalised beyond that point). OurWorldInData link: https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/covid?pickerSort=asc&pickerMetric=location&Metric=Confirmed+deaths&Interval=Cumulative&Relative+to+population=true&country=~OWID_WRL International Journal of Epidemiology link https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/52/1/22/6770060?login=false 6/10

COVID-19 Data Explorer Explore global data on COVID-19. ourworldindata.org

@A1an_M - Alan

Item 6 - Risk to Children As we know, in 2020 schools across the UK were closed as part of the national lockdowns, with disastrous impact on education, particularly of the very young and those due to sit exams, and disastrous impact on working parents who had to somehow balance work and home schooling. However it was clear from very early days that children were at vanishingly small risk from the virus and that the risks to them of losing education (and the resultant isolation from their peers) would be far higher. An article in The Times discussed a study conducted on 260 hospitals in Britain in the first half of 2020 and concluded that "no child who was not already profoundly ill has died of Covid-19 in Britain" "The study looked at 260 hospitals in England, Wales and Scotland. Out of the 69,500 patients admitted with proven Covid-19 in the first six months of the year, 651 — or 0.9 per cent — were under 19 years of age". "Six deaths of minors were recorded. Three were newborn babies with other severe health problems. The other three were aged 15 to 18 years old and also had “profound health issues”. Callum Semple, professor in child health and outbreak medicine at the University of Liverpool and Alder Hey Children’s Hospital, who is the senior author of the study, said: “The deaths that we did observe were children with what we would describe as profound co-morbidities — not a touch of asthma, not cystic fibrosis.” These children’s underlying illnesses would have been considered as “life-limiting”, he said. “We did not have any deaths in otherwise healthy school-aged children.” However the authorities, and some in the teaching profession, were happy to let the illusion that children were at some risk from the virus to persist in order to promote their own agendas. Times article: https://www.thetimes.com/uk/healthcare/article/all-children-who-died-of-covid-19-were-already-seriously-ill-jlxr8mkxq 7/10

All children who died of Covid-19 were already seriously ill No child who was not already profoundly ill has died of Covid-19 in Britain, a large study has indicated, with the researchers saying that the results should reassure parents as a new school term begins.The study looked at 260 hospitals in England, Wales and Scotland. Out of the 69,500 patients admi thetimes.com

@A1an_M - Alan

Item 7 Vaccine adverse effects We were assured, repeatedly, from the moment the novel COVID injectables were released, that they were "safe and effective". However the evidence that they were not quickly mounted. As early as March 2020, the Astra Zeneca vaccine was suspended in Nordic countries following adverse effects in medical workers who received it. And the MHRA was forced to mention the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis particularly in young males from vaccination with the Pfizer and Moderna products. And a number of coroners reports directly blamed the COVID injectables as the cause of death in several cases. But the insistence always remained that these were just extremely rare cases. The lie was given to all of this by the MHRA's Yellow Card data. Yellow Card had, up until December 2021 at least, always been used as an "early warning system" to identify problems with medicines. From the beginning of the tollout in December 2020 the MHRA received an absolute deluge of Yellow Card reports from recipients of the injectables who had suffered adverse effects immediately afterwards, as well as medical personnel reporting these symptoms on behalf of the injured and deceased. While not every reported injury may have been directly caused by the vaccine, we also know that Yellow Cards received by the MHRA only constitute a small fraction of the adverse effects actually experienced (they previously estimated that only 10% of serious effects were reported). By September 2023 it was clear from the data that there was an enormous issue with the safety of the vaccines. Serious adverse events were being reported to the MHRA at a rate of 1 for every 424 doses, and deaths running at 1 for every 60,000 doses (and bear in mind most people had at least 2 doses) but to this day there has been no acknowledgement or independent investigation. AZ injuries story: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-norway-idUSKBN2B50GZ/ The MHRA data has been largely archived in obscure locations on the internet now so is hard to link to, but I have all of the receipts if anyone is interested. 8/10

@A1an_M - Alan

Item 8 - Exaggerating the numbers of people who were Vaccinated. We were led to believe by the media that we vaccine refuseniks were in a tiny minority - less than 10%. And this was used heavily as a tactic by the media and government to pressure everyone into being vaccinated. You'll remember all the pressure from the likes of Andrew Neil and Piers Morgan and Sajid Javed and Esther Rantzen and Anne McElvoy and Uncle Tom Cobley and all... But this 10% number was based on ONS data which relied on (old) estimates of the UK population. Meanwhile the Health Security Agency used data from NIMS, which has a record of everyone registered with the NHS, and it estimated that the proportion of the English population which had not received a vaccine, was 19.5%. And ICM ran an opinion poll for Scottish Television on a representative sample of the population which discovered that 32% of the sample (825 out of the 2570 participants) said they'd had no vaccines. But as identified by @profnfenton ICM were sufficiently astonished at this outcome that they decided to apply some "post-survey weighting" to their sample to bring the number down to the "correct" level of 8%. But it's clear that we unvaccinated are a sizeable minority - far more than 10%. And the government knew this too, which is why they eventually recoiled from making the vaccines mandatory in the NHS (and probably in other roles too). BBC https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-55274833 ICM poll, Prof Fenton analysis: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccWOMtmH65U 9/10

Covid vaccine: How many people are vaccinated in the UK? A look at progress made in vaccinating the country, as more than 52 million people have received at least one dose and 38 million have had a booster or third dose. bbc.co.uk

@A1an_M - Alan

That's just a subset of the huge library of evidence that exists whoing that the whole of the coronavirus response was at best unnecessary and, more realistically, a gigantic fraud. You no doubt have plenty of examples of your own. But in summary: There was no "pandemic", simply a simulation of one. A simulation which could be repeated again tomorrow. And it could be done whether a novel virus existed or not. All that's needed is a compliant media, a gullible, hypnotised population, and a few grainy videos of crisis actors "dying" on foreign streets, and off we'll go again. Unless... unless some proper journalists are willing to tell the WHOLE truth about what happened in 2020-22, rather than just focus on the limited hangout about the lab leak and the source of the virus. Any volunteers? 10/10

@A1an_M - Alan

Of course the biggest fraud of all, and the one which the entire simulation depended on, and on which any new simulation will also depend, was the use of a test protocol, PCR, which was unfit for the purpose for which it was used. A test protocol which, as per its creator, can find pretty much anything in anyone, if done well. A test capable of finding tiny fragments of virus which are far too small to cause symptomatic illness, and far too small to make transmission to others a possibility. A test incapable of determining if the host is carrying live virus. A test which could deliver significant numbers of false positives and negatives. (False positives being a particular problem if, as mentioned below, decisions on isolation and contact tracing are being made on their basis). But a test whose sensitivity could be dialled up or down to show a sudden spike or dip in "cases" to meet the political requirements of the day. But the whole "testdemic" aspect is so important, it probably deserves a thread all of its own. One for another day... 11/10

@A1an_M - Alan

Probably worth adding that this thread is a summary of seven much longer threads which I wrote in Sep '23 to counter BBC VeryIffy's charge that there was an online Conspiracy Movement in the UK spreading misinformation about COVID and the response. See here: https://t.co/J6eOwBPb7i

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

JAPANESE BOMBSHELL: A COVID vaccine database covering 18 million citizens has just been released for the first time. After reviewing the data, a top professor warned: “The more doses you get, the sooner you’re likely to die.” The most terrifying finding was a deadly spike just 3 to 4 months after the final shot. Let’s break down the data. 🧵 THREAD

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

On June 15th, a group of brave Japanese truth seekers did what their government wouldn’t—they released a bombshell broadcast exposing vaccine data from over 18 million people. https://t.co/mUyJiosmJk

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Journalist Masako Ganaha posted on X: “If the government won’t do it, then the people should investigate the mass deaths of Japanese people! Database of 18 million vaccinated people revealed for the first time!” https://t.co/CAKdZLEFxk

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The video featured Member of the House of Representatives Kazuhiro Haraguchi, Dr. Yasufumi Murakami, and the Information Disclosure Request Team.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Dr. Yasufumi Murakami isn’t just some fringe voice. He’s a respected professor at the Tokyo University of Science, where he serves as vice director at the Research Center for RNA Science. He holds a Doctor of Pharmaceutical Science from the University of Tokyo and has authored over 100 scientific publications.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

But when the data went public, things got deeply unsettling. Pharma insider @_aussie17 shared a clip from the broadcast. Dr. Murakami’s conclusion was blunt: “…the more doses you get, the sooner you’re likely to die, within a shorter period…” https://t.co/LneueMXWKt

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The first graph compared death rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. According to Dr. Murakami, there was no noticeable spike in deaths among the unvaccinated. But among the vaccinated, a clear peak emerged—especially between 90 and 120 days after the shot. “A significant peak forms at three or four months,” he said, pointing to the vaccine as the likely cause. “It’s probably due to the vaccine’s influence, with adverse reactions occurring leading to death.”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Then came a graph that was impossible to ignore. It showed a clear pattern: the more vaccine doses a person received, the sooner they died after their final shot. The title translates to: “Number of days from final vaccination to death and number of deaths.” The note on the right reads: “As the number of vaccine doses increases, the peak in deaths appears sooner.” Each line represents people grouped by the final dose they received before death. In other words, those counted under the third dose curve had received three shots and died before receiving a fourth. What stood out most was the steep green spike representing deaths after the third dose. Not only was it the highest, but it also appeared earlier, around 90 to 120 days. The trend held across the board: as the number of doses increased, the peak of death consistently moved closer to the time of the last injection.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@_aussie17 As Dr. Murakami noted, “We found that as the number of doses increases, the peak of deaths appears faster, meaning the more doses you get, the sooner you’re likely to die, within a shorter period. So, the risk increases with more doses.” https://t.co/5j7yTTA2NY

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@_aussie17 He added, “If the vaccine had no toxicity or didn’t induce death, there wouldn’t be a peak. That’s the point.” https://t.co/AI3PXHOFKr

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@_aussie17 “This is a key discovery,” he continued. “The more doses, the more the peak shifts, indicating that the toxicity accumulates. The toxicity overlaps, and the more doses you receive, the faster people die.” https://t.co/5ZorqBMOTU

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@_aussie17 While the data is truly alarming, it comes as no surprise to anyone who’s been paying attention. There’s simply no excuse for these shots to still be on the market. https://t.co/PLcP6Z4kbp

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Remember, the swine flu vaccine was pulled in 1976 after just 25 deaths and around 550 cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome—and that was with only a quarter of Americans vaccinated. Ultimately, 53 deaths were linked to the program, and the government not only shut it down but also issued apologies and compensation to victims.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@_aussie17 As Dr. Peter McCullough (@P_McCulloughMD) stated in the video: “It’s unacceptable to have anyone take an injection electively and die. It’s absolutely unacceptable. It’s not something that our country has ever thought is okay to do.” https://t.co/xwnjpKehAi

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@_aussie17 @P_McCulloughMD Thanks for reading. Big hat tip to @_aussie17 for watching the Japanese broadcast and translating the clip featured in this thread into English. He’s absolutely worth a follow. https://t.co/EwxmFqEFDc

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@_aussie17 @P_McCulloughMD And if this evidence wasn’t enough, don’t miss the Senate hearing Pfizer never wanted you to see, led by @SenRonJohnson. https://t.co/aU5LAZrQHe

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The “safe and effective” narrative just collapsed on camera. Senator Ron Johnson brought the receipts, exposing how the Biden administration DELIBERATELY hid vaccine harms from the public. Then Dr. James Thorp (OB-GYN) revealed miscarriage data so disturbing, it left the room silent. This is the Senate hearing they never wanted you to see. I turned three hours of footage into a five-minute read. 🧵THREAD

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

BREAKING: Official NZ mortality data released under FOIA request shows that initial spike in deaths happened right after initial vaccine rollout and BEFORE COVID. Second spike happened after shot 3 rollout. Excess deaths were NOT driven by the unvaccinated.

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

Alert: England’s vaccinated population had close to one million deaths in 23 months; unvaccinated population had less than 61,000 deaths over the same period Shocking data released by the U.K. government shows that over the past two years, the vaccinated population in England has suffered an outrageous number of deaths compared to the unvaccinated population, even though approximately 30 percent of the population has not even had a single dose of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine. According to the U.K. Health Security Agency (UKHSA), by July 2022, 18.9 million people had refused the first dose of the COVID-19 injection, 21.5 million people had refused the second dose of the COVID-19 injection, alongside 2.6 million people who had received the first dose but refused the second, and 30.4 million people had refused the third dose of the COVID-19 injection, alongside 8.9 million people who had received the second dose but refused the third. (Related: CAUGHT: UK hospitals certified pneumonia deaths as COVID deaths to create illusion of pandemic.) According to the UKHSA's figures, 63.4 million people were eligible for vaccination at that point. Therefore, as of July 2022, 30 percent of England's population remained completely unvaccinated; 34 percent was not double vaccinated; and 50 percent was not triple vaccinated. However, the vaccinated population as a whole accounted for 95 percent of all COVID-19 deaths between January and May 2023, while the unvaccinated population accounted for just five percent. But it's the fact that these deaths aren't among the one-dose and two-dose vaccinated population that is truly horrifying. The vast majority are among those vaccinated four times, with this population accounting for 80 percent of all COVID-19 deaths, and 83 percent of all COVID-19 deaths among the vaccinated. #VaccineInjuries #mRNA #DiedSuddenly #ExcessDaeths #UK https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-03-01-england-million-vaccinated-deaths-61000-unvaccinated-deaths.html

DATA: England’s vaccinated population had close to one million deaths in 23 months; unvaccinated population had less than 61,000 deaths over the same period – NaturalNews.com Shocking data released by the U.K. government shows that over the past two years, the vaccinated population in England has suffered an outrageous number of deaths compared to the unvaccinated population, even though approximately 30 percent of the population has not even had a single dose of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine. According to the […] naturalnews.com