reSee.it - Related Post Feed
reSee.it AI Summary
The posts discuss controversial theories about World War II, claiming that it was a conspiracy to establish central banks and the US dollar as the global currency. They argue that the US fought on the wrong side, helping communism take over the world. The posts also question the validity of the Nuremberg International Tribunal and the Holocaust, suggesting that confessions were obtained through torture and that there is no evidence of mass graves or gas chambers. They argue that the death toll was much lower than reported and attribute the starvation and death in German labor camps to allied bombings.
@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️
Another day, another nuke from orbit. 🍝🥫🧵🪡 I’m done playing softball, from now on I am gonna sauce everyone’s balls off 24/7. It’s time to wake up from the matrix. The reality is, we send our best men to die fighting our Christian brothers for the almighty ✡️ machine. WW2 was a psyop to establish central banks (✡️) and cement the US dollar as the global currency. We slaughtered our own, and then let them lie to us about what happened and slander the ones fighting the evil. I cannot allow this.
@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️
https://archive.org/details/DennisWise_TGS
Internet Archive: ErrorInternet Archive logoDonate iconSearch iconSearch iconUpload iconUser iconWeb iconTexts iconVideo iconAudio iconSoftware iconImages iconDonate iconEllipses iconHamburger iconSearch iconDonate icon
archive.org
@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️
As General Patton said when WW2 was over, we fought the wrong side. The US helped communism take over the world. Our bravest, brightest Christian men slaughtered Germany’s bravest, Christian soldiers to unknowingly install the system that you see today. They ✡️ laughed their way to the bank. Remember the Battle of the Bulge? Germans & Americans called a truce to celebrate Christmas together. Eating, playing sports, etc https://owlcation.com/humanities/About-World-War-2-A-Small-Christmas-Truce
@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️
When it was all over, they✡️ had a show trial for all of the world to watch. During the Nuremberg International Tribunal, which was 75% Jewish, they lied about everything, presented zero evidence that anything happened, created a narrative based on hearsay, and established the never ending Holohoax victim narrative we still experience today; this narrative would be used to establish wealth and power for future generations. The judges that presided were embarrassed to be a part, and said as much.
@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️
The information about how the presiding judges felt about these trials has been widely studied and discussed, and a lot of it can be found in this book. https://www.holocausthandbooks.com/dl/15-loth.pdf https://t.co/dUsrMmIVb7
@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️
“Confessions” from German soldiers and officers were used as evidence of atrocities. These officers were tortured, sometimes to death, to sign statements in English (a language they did not speak), admitting to horrors that scientifically and mathematically could not have taken place. More on these confessions can be found in this book: https://www.holocausthandbooks.com/dl/15-loth.pdf
@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️
The reality is that Jews were not kept in death camps, they were kept in labor camps. Hundreds of land surveys, ground samples, GPR scans, and other experiments have been conducted at all of these camps. No evidence of mass graves has EVER been found, and the claim that they were all incinerated is mathematically impossible even by todays crematorium standards. More evidence in this book: https://www.holocausthandbooks.com/dl/15-loth.pdf
@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️
They claim that ✡️s were gassed by the millions, using hydrogen cyanide gas (the chemical name for Zyklon-B), however hood scraping the walls of all the supposed “gas chambers,” zero evidence of this was found. In addition, when someone is poisoned with Cyanide, their body turns a bright red color due to a lack of oxygen present in the blood. We have never heard of millions of bright red bodies being buried. https://www.holocausthandbooks.com/dl/15-loth.pdf
@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️
In addition to these facts, Red Cross documents depicting the death tolls they found amount to just 272,000 people; this matches records that can be found of the total tally of prisoners in the camps at these times. This information is available here: windowintopalestine.blogspot.com/2010/12/offici… https://t.co/leXvnvH2vu
@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️
If that isn’t convincing enough, one could easily look in the World Almanac to find census data regarding the total global population of Jews during the 1929-1948 time period. https://t.co/EtANpWGMOn
@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️
In reality these were not gas chambers, they were delousing chambers. Zyklon-B, known to US countries as DDT, was a repellant used to control the spread of lice, which was causing Typhus outbreaks responsible for some of the bodies we see in pictures with falsified captions claiming they were gassed. The inscriptions on the doors and above them, often edited out or photoshopped, say as much.
@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️
This video provides a ton more sauce on what these chambers were used for and you can easily pause and take screenshots. https://t.co/jFOD6Aeiux
@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️
The reality is that most of the starvation and death we saw from these German labor camps, the “piles of bodies,” was from allied forces bombing German railroads and supply routes. https://t.co/kM6EzwQ4pX
Video Transcript AI Summary
Many bodies at Nordhausen were actually killed by Allied bombing, not by Germans as claimed. The media often shows images of Nordhausen, but evidence shows prisoners were bombed and strafed by British warplanes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Large number of the bodies were in reality the direct result of allied bombing strafing attacks. Images of Nordhausen are used all over the major media, but it has been proven that these prisoners were blown up and strafed by British warplanes, and they were not exterminated by the Germans as the official story goes.
@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲
We see the memes going around of all the newspaper headlines talking about "6 million jėws" before WW2. This gent went and got the hard copy receipts: https://t.co/RjZJt231IS
Video Transcript AI Summary
In various newspaper articles from 1920 to 1938, it is mentioned that 6,000,000 Jews in Central and Eastern Europe were facing horrifying conditions of famine, disease, and death. These articles highlight the need for aid and intervention to save the Jewish population from extermination and persecution. The articles also mention the European Holocaust and the tragic situation faced by Jews in Central Europe. These reports were published years before the start of World War II and the rise of Adolf Hitler. The articles emphasize the urgent need for assistance and protection for the Jewish community.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ago. The New York Times. The date, Friday, May 7, 1920. It's page 11 that I want. There we go.
Page 11. Page 11. The article is called The Jewish War Aide Gets $100,000 Gift. Notice, the phone for Jewish war sufferers in Central and Eastern Europe, where 6,000,000, this horrifying conditions of famine, disease, and death was enriched yesterday by a contribution of $100,000 from Nathan Strauss, where 6,000,000 face horrifying conditions of famine, disease, and death. 6000000s.
This horrifying conditions of famine, disease, and death.
Speaker 1: I'll just go down the rest
Speaker 0: of the article if anybody wants to read it. That's an article called. Jewish war aid gets $100,000 gift. In The New York Times, Friday, May 7th 1920.
Speaker 1: Here's the New York Times again. This is
Speaker 0: 1921. I got New York Times, Wednesday, July 20, 1921. It's page 2 that I want.
Speaker 1: There we go. Page
Speaker 0: 2. Page 2. New York Times, July 20th 1921. And the article is called Begs America, Save 6,000,000 in Russia. Massacre threatens all Jews as Soviet power winds, declares Kremlin.
Come on here for aid. Look at that. Russia's 6,000,000 Jews are facing extermination by massacre. As the famine is spreading, the counterrevolutionary movement is gaining, and the Soviet control is winning.
Speaker 1: Now this is one of
Speaker 0: the biggest articles I left. This is 1921, 12 year before Adolf Hitler ever set foot in the government. Look at that. Russia's 6,000,000 Jews have faced an extermination by massacre. As an article entitled Bex America Saved 6,000,000 in Russia on page 2 in The New York Times, Wednesday, July 20th
Speaker 1: This is the Gazette
Speaker 0: of Montreal. This is 1931. The Gazette, Montreal, Tuesday, December 29th 1931. This is over a year before Hitler come to power. The gazette is page 6 that I want.
Speaker 1: Here we go.
Speaker 0: Page 6. Page 6, The Gazette, Montreal, December 29, 1931. And the article pretty much speaks up for itself. 6,000,000 Jews face starvation. 6,000,000.
Bad conditions in Southeastern Europe reported by Rabbi Wise. Fierce crisis at hand. 6,000,000 Jews in Eastern Europe face starvation and even worse during the coming winter. 6,000,000 Jews. I'll get I'll give you a look at the rest of the article.
The article is called 6,000,000 Jews Faced Starvation, The Gazette of Montreal, December 29, 1931, one and a half year before
Speaker 1: This the next newspaper This is The New York Times again.
Speaker 0: There we go. New York Times. This is dated 1936, Sunday, May 31, 1936. This does not say the 6,000,000 Jews, but it does say Holocaust. New York Times.
It's page 14 that I want.
Speaker 1: Have a go.
Speaker 0: Page 14, The New York Times, May 31, 1936, and the article is called Americans appeal for Jewish refuge. It's quite a big article. Put it along here. Yeah. The petition, in expressing the opinion of enlightened Christian leadership in the United States, favoring a larger Jewish immigration to Palestine, stressed the intolerable sufferings of the millions of Jews in the European Holocaust, the European Holocaust in 1936, before the 2nd World War even started.
There it is again. Great Britain has it in her power to throw open the gates of Palestine and let in the victimized and persecuted Jews escaping from the European holocaust, the European holocaust in 1936, three and a half year before the 2nd World War ever even started. That's in an article entitled Americans appealed for Jewish refuge, The New York Times, May 31, 1936.
Speaker 1: Here's the next newspaper. This is New York Times again.
Speaker 0: New York Times, this is dated February 23rd 1938. This is before the 2nd World War started, about a year and a half.
Speaker 1: The New York
Speaker 0: Times. It's page 23 that I want.
Speaker 1: There you go.
Speaker 0: Page 23.
Speaker 1: The New York
Speaker 0: Times, February 23, 1938. And the article is called Jewish teachers charted by Isaacs. Now go along the bottom. And it's a Jewish Tragedy pictured. At the present picture of 6,000,000 Jews in Central Europe, deprived of protection All economical opportunities slowly dying of starvation.
All hope gone was presented to the teachers by Jacob Tarsus. The Jewish tragedy started when Hitler came into power in 1933.
Speaker 1: That is again, people.
Speaker 0: 6,000,000 Jews in Central Europe slowly dying of starvation. 6,000,000. It's in 1938. Jewish teachers chartered by Isaacs. New York Times, February 23, 1938, a year and a half before the 2nd World War even started.
@Wordsarewordz - Words are words
6 million how many times before Hitler was even around? Perhaps they’ve been hiding history. https://t.co/7ZXZmxC0OG
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the early 1900s, various articles from The New York Times and other sources mentioned the plight of 6,000,000 Jews facing poverty, starvation, and death in different regions. The articles highlighted the need for help and support for this population. The speaker emphasized the significant number of Jewish individuals suffering during that time, years before Hitler's rise to power.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of New York, Sunday, June 6, 1915. This is 18 year before Hitler ever set up under government. There it is, people. 6,000,000 Jews. The New York Times, October 18, 1918, and the article isn't called $1,000,000,000 fund to be billed duly.
There it is. 6,000,000 souls will need help to resume normal life when war has ended. The New York Times, September 8th 1919, and the article is called Ukrainian Jews aim to stop problems. Mass meeting he has that a 127,000 Jews are being killed and 6,000,000 are on power. In The New York Times, November 12, 1919, and it reduced to tragically unbelievable poverty, starvation, and disease.
About 6,000,000 souls or half the Jewish population of the earth. February 23, 1920. 6,000,000 Jews. Friday, May 7th 1920. The Fund For Jewish Watsofas in Central and Eastern Europe, where 6,000,000 face horrifying conditions of famine, disease, and death.
New York Times, Wednesday, July 20, 1921, 12 year before Adolf Hitler ever said for the government. Look at that. Russia's 6,000,000 Jews have faced an extermination by massacre. The Gazette, Montreal, December 29, 1931. And the article pretty much speaks up for itself.
6,000,000 Jews faced off
@realstewpeters - Stew Peters
We’ve all been duped.🐀☠️ The 6 million number has everything to do with satanic symbology rather than realistic historical accuracy. 👹 https://t.co/mwxMHUw4z7
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the video, the speaker highlights historical articles mentioning 6,000,000 Jews facing various hardships from 1915 to 1938. The articles discuss issues like famine, disease, and extermination, emphasizing the significant challenges faced by the Jewish population.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Never felt more played in my entire life than I am feeling right now. I'm about to show you a video, and I want you to pay close attention to the narrative. And I also want you to pay close attention to the dates. Do some math.
Speaker 1: As in the sun of New York, Sunday, June 6, 1915. This is 18 year before Hitler ever set foot in the government. These people, 6,000,000 Jews. The New York Times, October 18, 1918, and the article isn't called $1,000,000,000 fund to rebuild a jury. Now it is.
6,000,000 souls will need help to resume normal life when war was ended. The New York Times, September 8, 1919, and the article is called Ukrainian Jews aim to stop problems. Mass meeting hears that a 127,000 Jews are being killed and 6,000,000 on Powell. In The New York Times, November 12, 1919, And if reduced to tragically unbelievable poverty, starvation, and disease, about 6,000,000 souls or half the Jewish population of the earth. February 23, 1920.
6,000,000 Jews. Friday, May 7, 1920. The Fund For Jewish War Sufers in Central and Eastern Europe, where 6,000,000 face horrifying conditions of famine, disease, and death. New York Times, Wednesday, July 20, 1921, 12 year before Adolf Hitler ever set foot in the government. Look at that.
Russia's 6,000,000 Jews have faced an extermination by massacre. The Gazette, Montreal, December 29, 1931. And the article pretty much speaks up for itself. 6,000,000 Jews face starvation. New York Times, February 23, 1938, a year and a half before the 2nd World War even started.
At a present picture of 6,000,000 Jews in Central Europe, deprived of protect
reSee.it AI Summary
I reached out to someone today with a serious message about the potential for WWIII, driven by what I believe are dangerous influences within the Biden Administration. I shared unsettling historical facts, questioning the narratives surrounding major events like the Holocaust and the Bolshevik Revolution, suggesting that Jewish individuals played significant roles in these tragedies. I emphasized the need for truth and freedom of speech to achieve reconciliation and peace. I also expressed concern about the disproportionate representation of Jewish individuals in key positions of power and called for a change in leadership.
@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig
I wrote this to someone today. Dear ......, The same people behind WWI+WWII+ Bolshevik Revolution and even the Chinese revolution are right now hellbent on starting WWIII. I wish to share these facts with you in the hope that you will help stop the loxists in the Biden Administration doing what they can to start WWIII. To be able to do that, I need to share some probably unpleasant facts. If you don't want any of that, you should stop reading any further. That is your choice, I am fine with that, I understand. ........ ........ ........ Okay, if you are still here. If you do read it, then please consider coming out talking against the very strong power of the people Jesus warned us about, the Pharisees or "the Jews who are not Jews and do lie". You can say the same about people pretending to be Christians, Catholics and Muslims, who are in fact Masons, Jesuits and Wahabiists. They all have in common, one thing, they worship the devil, satan, moloch, baal. Once you have read the following, please take your time, it is a lot of information, I guarantee everything has been thoroughly investigated. Here goes: Did you know Churchill, De Gaulle and Eisenhower did not mention the holocaust nor the 6 Mio figure in over 7.000 pages of memoires? Neither does Encyclopedia Britannica mention the Holocaust in its 1968 version, 23 years after the event. Did you know that Auschwitz KZ camp changed their numbers from 4 Mio to 1 Mio and Majdanek from 2 Mio to 30k? Did you know that forensic evidence proves no gassing has taken place anywhere and that all the stories about lampshades, soaps, shrunken heads were all lies? The lies came mainly from camps situated in territories occupied by the USSR. Please see attached official document proving no gassings took place in the Western Allied occupied territories (attached). If you are interested in learning about Auschwitz I recommend the Leuchter report. You can watch these 5 min with Mr Leuchter https://www.bitchute.com/video/1Geck9MDCXWC/ Fred Leuchter American Gas Chamber Expert The Bolshevik revolution in the USSR was a Jewish revolution. 95% of the government was Jewish (that is even 10% more than the present Biden administration). 92% of management managing the gulags were Jewish. 50% of the generals in the NKVD that killed tens of millions of mainly Orthodox Christians and Muslims were Jewish. The USSR also claimed the murder of 21.857 Polish officers in Katyn was done by Germans. At Nuremberg they crushed the balls of 137 out of 139 Germans on trial and threatened them that they would be murdered with their wives and children. Thus motivated they signed a pre written statement that the Germans had murdered the Polish officers in Katyn. In 1989 when the archives were opened in the USSR, Gorbachow publicly admitted that it was in fact the Bolsheviks red army and NKVD, that had murdered the best of the Goyims in accordance with the instructions in the Talmud. Not my words. It is in the Talmud: "Kill the best of the Gentiles''. So we know for a fact: 1: Jews killed tens of millions of Orthodox Christians and Muslims 2: We know they have tried framing the Germans for Katyn, lampshades etc. Is it so difficult to imagine that they were quite motivated to shift the blame from them to the defenseless Germans for the genocide of millions of people? And with the help of hundreds of holocaust movies made by nearly 100% Jewish hollywood, the whole world has been traumatised by stories about gassings, lampshades, soap etc. I certainly have as has my wife, I am sure you as well. The same time hardly anyone has heard about the Jewish holocaust on tens of millions of Russians and Ukrainians from 1917 onwards. And even fewer know about the murder of 15 Mio Germans from 1945-1948 and many more raped, plundered, tortured and ethnically cleansed in the most horrible crimes against humanity ever committed in alledged peace time. Stalin and Jewish Ilya Ehrenberg stated publicly that their soliders should kill and rape all Germans, any psychopath among the Russians were thus given a free pass. I of course acknowledge that the 95% of Russian soldiers who were not psychopaths didn't rape and murder civilians. And while not a single document has ever been found documenting the Germans plan to exterminate the Jews, nor a single statement from a leading German, which is quite ironic since we have seen, read and heard hundreds of statements from Israelis calling the Palestinians "Amalek" and publicly stating their wish to exterminate every one of them including pregnant mothers with babies in their womb. Then there are numerous Jewish politicians, scholars, rabies and authors writing about killing Germans, white people and Christians. There is a word for those people. They are loxists. Here are a couple of examples. Henry Morganthau with his Morganthau plan signed in September 1944 by Roosevelt, half Jewish Churchill and Jewish Stalin (his name was Jugasvili, which means Jewish, he spoke fluent Hebrew and had two Jewish wives). The plan stated the wish to murder 20% of the Germans. Which is exactly what they did. Theodore Kaufman's book "Germany Must Perish". Louis Nizer's book "What to do with Germany" And of course Coodenhove-Kalergy Praktischer Idealismus the plan that is instrumental for the mass illegal immigration we see now in the tens of millions into the US, Canada and EU of mainly young men from countries we have looted and carpet bombed. Now we know the Jewish Bolsheviks were mass murdering liars, is it so hard to believe they wanted to shift the blame on the Germans? Especially if you consider many of them probably were.... loxists. I understand it is a lot of information to absorb, please do your own research and if you come to the same conclusions, I hope you will make the right decision. Rest assured collective punishment is only in the Talmud, both Christianity and Islam has "an eye for an eye", which mean only the guilty person can be punished and only after due process without torture and the guilty persons family, friends, fellow countrymen or even with same religion can not be collectively punished. I am a Christian man, I believe in forgiveness and truth and reconciliation. But please note I said Truth, it is very important. Only with freedom of speech, truth, freedom to study ALL historic events including the holocast and due process can we get to forgiveness and reconciliation and hopefully peace for a 1000 years plus. We need to Separate Synagogue and State, we can't have 85% Jewish people in the Biden Administration, and a simlilar quota in the Federal Reserve, Hollywood, deans on universities and CEOs of mainstream media and wall street. I hope you agree that they are really not up to the task, if their task is to benefit not only Jewish people, but all people. They had a fair shot at it, but clearly failed the task. We need a new team in charge. Thanks again Mads
Fred Leuchter American Gas Chamber Expert
The Holocaust Debunked In 5 Minutes
bitchute.com
@Wordsarewordz - Words are words
Ernst Zündel - (AVOF 37) Cremation Technology & The Holocaust. https://t.co/KQUVwKifwN
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ernst Zundel, President of Sammis Lab Publishers, discusses his involvement in the reprinting of the booklet "Did 6,000,000 Really Die?" and his subsequent trial for Holocaust denial. He presents the testimony of Ivan Lagasse, a crematory expert, who challenges the claims of the Holocaust by explaining the process of cremation and the limitations of the crematory units. Lagasse states that the high numbers of cremations alleged at Auschwitz-Birkenau are physically unrealistic and scientifically unsupported. He also refutes claims of a stench from burning bodies and the ability to determine the ethnicity of the victims based on the color of the smoke. Zundel concludes that the standard version of the Holocaust is a hoax and encourages further research on the topic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm Erud Sundu, President of Sammis Lab Publishers Limited in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. To those of you who have never seen a showroom by us before, you will wonder why I'm holding up this booklet, Did 6,000,000 Really Die? Well, this booklet dominated 9 years of my life. I had reprinted it, it was the work of an English author, I reprinted it in Canada, distributed it widely to members of parliament, to clergy, engineers, historians and so on and found myself charged by the President of the Holocaust Remembrance Association of Toronto in 1983. She was a Jewish woman called Sabina Citron.
I had been researching and investigating the wild claims surrounding the Holocaust story with some skepticism and had casually talked to engineers and people involved in fumigation of buildings and so on and came to the conclusion that not all was true as concerned the Holocaust. And so when I was charged finally, I had to concentrate my mind on proving that there were some things wrong and did NOK6 1,000,000 really die. And so I dispatched a researcher to the local Toronto Crematory, which is within 500 meters walking distance of where I live and work. And the crematory operator there confirmed a number of my suspicions. Yes, he said it took quite a while to create a body and even with modern equipment, it could take up to 2 hours per body.
And yes, is that it is not true that there is a smell in the air as many of the Holocaust writers and alleged victims and eyewitnesses had claimed that they could smell the stench of burning human bodies from the crematory. Is it totally untrue that for over 130 years, there was no smell associated with the cremation of bodies. That of course was a revelation to me and I thought that a crematory operator, an expert from Toronto could easily come to the court and testify. Well, it wasn't so easy. He kindly but firmly declined because he said it would not be very good for his career and so on.
So then I spoke to my attorney and I said, well, how about if we ask the court to go to the crematory, meaning the jury, the judge, the court clerks, the prosecution and himself and myself and that then we could all together witness a cremation, which is sometimes done to go to not the scene of the crime, but the scene of some action. However, my legal advisors, my attorney and other advisers suggested that, that would be such an outrageous act and it would seem callous and so on that I should not do it, it would backfire on me. Well, finally, I was persuaded by that argument and, cast around to find a crematory expert that could help me and give some expert testimony. I found this man in the person of a man called Ivan Lagasse and Ivan Lagasse's testimony is contained in this book about my trial, it's called Did You Will Die? The Evidence in the Ernst and Young Holocaust Trial in 1988.
You will find it in Page 267 to Page 271. And I'll just quickly quote some background of Ivan Lagaest, the man who finally became my expert on Crematory's and we say here that he testified April 5th April 6, 1988 and his testimony can be found in volume 27 of the court transcripts of my 1988 trial, if you want to verify what I'm going to tell you in a minute. Ivan Nagase was tendered as an expert in the practical aspects of crematorium practice. Nagase worked as a professional embalmer funeral director and crematory manager Humber College in Ontario Humber College in Ontario and in 1979 obtained his diploma in Ontario license. In 1983, he obtained his Alberta license.
You can find that in volume 27, pages 7,383 to 7,394 in the court transcripts of my 1988 trial, date April 5 April 6, 1988. The fact that he is an expert is borne out as we continue on Page 268. In the course of his career, Lageis had dealt with over 10,000 bodies in his work and had cremated over 1,000 bodies himself. The work involved bodies in a variety of physical conditions from accident and fire victims to people who died of highly contagious diseases. Now he used flow charts to explain to the jury, which are for a layman, the process of cremation.
He brought along fire bricks and he let them feel it and touch it, lift it in order to show what kind of material was involved. He also pointed out that these fire bricks are extremely expensive, costing up to $60 for 1 brick and that, therefore, it is a very costly matter if the operator isn't very careful or if the cremation retort is crowded. He was asked to look at the blueprints that we had obtained of the Bokenau Auschwitz Bokenau cremation area. And he indicated after studying it with amazement that the Bow Valley Crematorium where he was the director of and using overhead slides, he pointed to the crematory's cremation chamber, the flame port, the smoke channel and settling chamber and the afterburner. And he testified that it was obvious that the Germans were concerned with environmental effects of the crematory.
La Gaze also found the most amazing and unique part of the Birkenau Crematory to be the stack, calculated to be 45 feet high and therefore very similar to Beau Valley Crematorium stack. In Lagege's opinion, the rate of burn of the Birkenau unit would be as efficient, but not more than his own unit in Calgary. Now I want to be absolutely sure that you understand this. We are talking here the Germans 19 41, 2, 3, 4 technology, and he is working in 1988 at that time in the Bow Valley Crematory in Calgary, Alberta. So the Germans had in those concentration camps state of the art crematories, which were not surpassed anywhere at that time in the world.
And Lageis was saying the only difference was the Germans used coal fired crematories, whereas in Canada, they used natural gas. Now this is an advantage because a coal fired crematory, of course, the ashes are in there, they are glowing, they are hot and you cannot at will cool it down, whereas in a Canadian or North American crematory, you can if you use natural gas because just what you do is you turn the flame down and finally turn the flame off and so the cooling process is much faster. So potentially, in a Canadian crematory, you could reach much higher cremation rates. And then he was asked about the Holocaust claims of numbers of cremations at Auschwitz Birkenau. And Lageries commented on Raul Hilberg's claiming the destruction of European Jews, 2nd edition page 978, capacities of the 46 retorts in the 4 crematories at Wirgenau.
And he said, quoting Doctor. Hilberg, the theoretical daily capacity of the 4 Wirgenau crematory was somewhat over 4,400 persons or cadavers, but with break downs and slowdowns, the practical limit was almost always lower. Laguerre stated that this claim was ludicrous. Based on his own experience, Laguerre testified that it would only have been possible to create a maximum of 184 bodies a day in Bergenau. So the words that he used is preposterous, beyond the realm of reality, ludicrous.
And then he was asked by the defense attorney my defense attorney, Di Chrystie, about Riedlinger, who claimed 6,000 a day to be cremated, others who claimed 8,000 people were burned. And some of them said 24,000 were handled a day. To this, Ivan Lagaest, the Canadian crematory expert says, it was irresponsible. These people were irresponsible with their facts because this doesn't even begin to end the reality at all. It is just physically unrealistic.
Physically unrealistic. In other words, science dares to say the Holocaust, as we have heard it, is basically a hoax because if the story of this massive burning and so on is untrue, The people who claim these ridiculously high numbers of victims have to explain where the bodies went or where they wear or where the mass graves are. They have no answers. Then they take refuge, of course, sometimes in burning pits. And the burning pits simply are equally untrue.
A, I looked at all kinds of aerial photographs of these camps. There are no burning pits, there is no smoke rising from open burning pits, which you certainly would have to see because you see everything else. You see steam coming from a locomotive, why would you not see smoke coming from 4000 or 10000 burning bodies. Also, there are no mountains of coals near the crematory that would be necessary or near the burning pits, they're not there. And Lageries makes another good point is that the Germans had this unique construction of crematories at Auschwitz and there were 3 retorts built next to one another.
He said that's very efficient and it is cheaper to build a crematory like that, but if one brick in one unit became defective, cracked or broke, and therefore, it would paralyze all 3 units. So what seemed efficient at first is very costly and time consuming and expensive after because not only can you not cremate in the one that is damaged, but you cannot cremate in the 2 adjacent ones because you cannot have 2,200 Degrees Fahrenheit radiating around, while the next site is being constructed. Also he said, after crematory, retort is being repaired. It takes between 3 4 weeks to cure it, and you can only start to cremate people slowly, maybe 1 a day or maximum 2 a day and so on rather than 1 every 2 hours or 2.5 hours. That's the reality.
Science has proven that the standard version that you and I hear in Hollywood films or see on television shows or read in these survival books or are exposed to at the Holocaust Museum in Washington DC are in effect, if not bold faced outright lies, they are certainly fanciful tales told by people who report hearsay rumors from a 50 year ago wartime situation. Inform yourself, you can get information and books and videos about this topic from us at Sami Stat Publishers and we'll be glad to send them to you. I am Ernst Sendel, thanking you for your time. Au Vida Zen.
Speaker 1: I'd like to welcome everybody. I brought you here to our crematorium that I myself am in charge of in operating. And I wanted you to experience what a modern crematory is, and rather than explain with a lot of words, I preferred that I demonstrate, so we decided to videotape this, this evening, just so that you can get a very good picture as to what we're dealing with here. Now basically the process of cremation, if you think of the human body as being basically mostly comprised of water, the best way to describe the process of cremation would be rapid oxidization of the human body by exposure to heat or flame. So we're not actually burning anything.
The first stage of cremation is dehydration. We have to burn off all the water by evaporation, which is a cleaner part of the cremation because water just produces steam, which doesn't pose a problem. The fats and other body solids are the only part that's really combusted in cremation. What remains is fine bone fragments, which are very brittle because you've removed all of the properties, all the water contents from them and whatnot. Okay, what you're looking at is the inside of the actual cremation hearth itself.
This is the chamber that the human remains are placed in, and this is where the main combustion chamber is. If you look at the top right hand corner, you'll see an opening. Now that area leads into what they call an afterburner chamber. This is a typical retort design. Most crematoriums do not stray from this design very much, even from the 1930s model right through to today.
So the modern crematory actually in the hearth itself hasn't changed. The only thing that's really changed is the control of the draft, the burners are different. In this one, we're using natural gas, some use oil, the older models, particularly in the 30s, they were fired by coal. Now in this one, the human remains are exposed directly to flame. In the coal fired model, the heat is usually radiated.
In other words, the heat is from underneath the floor, the body is not exposed directly to the flame, but it's just exposed to great temperatures and it just combusts on that nature. They are quite a bit slower than these ones because of the nature that we're using gas fired jets and we can expose the body directly to the flame. You'll see the brick is flaking just over here at the side. You can see how fragile it is. I can just knock some of this down.
That's normal spalling. The brick from the heat just begins to flake a little bit and a little bit, and that's the way the bricks wear out. Once the brick has worn about halfway through, about 2 inches in, then we have to rebrick the unit. Now rebricking the unit means you have to rebrick the whole thing. If you rebrick the sides, quite often you have to rebrick the ceiling.
Sometimes in certain cases you may not if you're using an experienced breaker, but typically you're rebricking the entire machine once you're breaking the sidewalls. Okay. Now in a situation where these units are going to go over a major overhaul and repair, it requires a complete shutdown usually up to 3 days of cooling, okay, before someone can actually go in there and work because this floor being several feet thick will still radiate quite a bit of heat even after 3 days, and it gets quite hot in there. Now in the case where we're tearing out, this unit is fairly simple. The ones that I've seen in the blueprints for Berchenau, they had 3 5 units of 3 hearts or 3 retorts.
Okay? So these are if you would picture this as being the center one, these two walls would be sharing the units next to it. Okay. It would be impossible to break just 1 in a situation like that. You have to tear up all 3 since they're all connected and sharing these inner walls, okay?
And that's quite a big job. This unit takes about a good 3 to 4 days to break, just one unit, okay, to tear it out and replace the breaks. And then you have a good day to 2 days of a break in period. Okay. In the case of Birkenau, one of the major problems there, as I mentioned you have to re break 3 of them all at the same time, but where a real problem comes in is where all of the units share 1 stack or 1 chimney.
So in a situation like that, you have to shut down all of the units, because you can't operate units even though they don't need rebricking, because the heat would radiate in from the stack. You'd create a draft in this direction, and it just wouldn't be safe to rebrick it. So it poses a real problem because you have to rebrick after just say the floor you have to replace after 1,000 formations. If you could even stretch that to 2,000 as the modern units are today, you can see the logistics of the problems that you're going to have immediately with that. There are just limit certain limitations that the refractory does have.
Speaker 2: Mr. Legasse, we're very pleased to have you on this interview. In the Calgary Sun on March 11th, the the entertainment editor said, something to the fact that 6,000 bodies a day were gassed and I presume she meant cremated too. How about just let us reduce it to 2,000 and say, how many retorts would be required just to cremate a minimum of 2,000 bodies a day?
Speaker 1: Well, if you could imagine an average 8 hour day, it's possible to do about 3 cremations in that period of time, extending that over to 24 hour period, maximum would be 9 to 10 bodies per day, okay. Taking 2,000 and dividing it by then to 200 units, okay? And even if you did 2 skinny persons that you mentioned earlier, per burn, it's still about a 100 minutes. You know, just to do that, just to give you an idea, you can some statistics, and I'll try to send along copies of this to you. Just in North America, that's Canada and the United States combined, last year, 412,457, just about 400,000 bodies were cremated last year in North America.
And to do that over the entire year, they used 1064 crematories. Just to show you how many units realistically it requires to handle the demand in North America.
Speaker 2: You've all heard stories about the stench that people claim around Auschwitz. Would there be any smell from burning flesh crematorium degree in the years 1930s to 1945?
Speaker 1: No, that's impossible. If there is any stentions, it will not come from human remains. In the blueprint, I had noticed that there was a unit after the fact, okay, it was right by the chimney, okay, well after the crematory and it was basically incinerator for rubbish. That's my nearest guess. So if you're burning certain types of rubbish, at that point, it might be possible that the orders would come from that source.
You have to remember too that we today operate a commentary with FX. We have to be only 1 commission at a time per law, we use safety, there's a lot of consideration in that situation, there's nothing to say that they use the actual cremation chambers to dispose a lot of the rubbish produced in the cat. No one's really thought of that. We just assume that there would only be bodies earned in those units. It could have been rubbish.
Speaker 2: I understand there was factory right in time to store too.
Speaker 1: That's the situation. You can't say that the order didn't come there, you can't say that unless you were there, you can't. It's possible. The important thing that I'm going to stress is that no orders would have come from the bodies themselves being committed.
Speaker 2: What about the so called gas chamber or gas oven legend that they say they put them
Speaker 1: in alive and killed them and cremated them? Well, technically, it's impossible. It's as simple as that. Those stories just simply come from years of telling stories and become exaggerated and one person carries it and add a little bit to it. But it has no scientific foundation to it at all.
Okay? So that's as far as I'm going to comment on
Speaker 2: So probably you've answered the question, what about the stories of the Auschwitz survivors and Holocaust survivors that claim that one body was cremated every minute and a half in a 24 hour period.
Speaker 1: Well, there's no technical support for that claim. There never was, there's a lot of witnesses that claims to be sold and they control figures. But there's no proof, okay, that's been produced to me yet that shows that it's possible to make that rate. The technology as far as I'm concerned does not exist up to date even with using gas burners, I don't think it'd be really possible to do so.
Speaker 2: But would there be any difference in the time element between a skinny body and a fat body?
Speaker 1: No. The fat body contains the fat or oils, oils is another fuel, okay, and will burn. So if you put a charge to reach our area with the least person, the fact will contribute to the cremation itself, okay, to speed that process up. But if you think of a skinny person, they don't have that extra fast, so they don't have that extra fuel, so the temperatures don't reach as high. Okay?
So the unit runs harder with an obese person than with an emaciated person.
Speaker 2: Okay. What is your opinion of the claims of the Holocaust survivors in court testimony under Olin? And I don't know if you were there or not, but one of the witnesses claimed that they could tell on every day what type of people were being cremated because the smoke was a different color for different ethnic groups?
Speaker 1: Well, that has no impact basis to it at all. I find it quite a bit of an exaggeration. Again, the victims exaggerate the stories and try to make them as emotional as possible, in a way I feel for it, in one sense, but it has no fact based, it's just simply you cannot tell by the color of smoke or flame or anything of that nature, what race, color, creed you may be. I think any average man can figure that out on his own. You don't need to be a scientist.
You can see that that's just an exaggeration. I just want to thank everyone for giving me this opportunity to present you with this video. I hope you found it educational and helped to clarify a lot of the mysteries surrounding the process of cremation and give you a more realistic view overview of the entire process. I'll let you draw your own conclusions from that. I think the facts speak for themselves, and until they're presented and otherwise, you have no reason to believe that the, cremations in the camps occurred at the rate they did.
And until that occurs, I think that the whole process or the whole allegation of Holocaust is stopped dead in its tracks so to speak. Until someone can clarify to me and prove to me that cremations can be done at a faster rate than 2 hours, I find no reason to believe that the Holocaust has been presented to us for courage and I don't expect anyone else to believe so otherwise.
@Wordsarewordz - Words are words
No odors come from cremated bodies…. yet there’s 6 million stories from jews talking about the smells of burning bodies.🧐
reSee.it AI Summary
They lied about Adolf, and I've noticed a lot of anger surrounding this topic. My favorite movie used to be Inglorious Bastards, but I can't watch it anymore after learning more. There’s a thread with over 20 sources questioning the Holocaust, and some people have faced serious consequences for their views. I came across an article from 1940 discussing a New World Order pledged to Jews, which I found interesting. Since my video gained unexpected attention, I invite Holocaust believers to debunk the claims, as some Israelis feel the Holocaust is misused in the Diaspora.
@Wordsarewordz - Words are words
If anyone is genuinely curious, I noticed a lot of people are mad haha, let me start by saying my favorite movie not long ago was Inglorious Bastards, knowing what I know now, I’ll never watch the 💩 again. There’s probably 20+ sources in this thread, most of them got sent to prison.
@Wordsarewordz - Words are words
A massive thread questioning The Holocaust. 🧵⬇️ https://t.co/gKoKEdBvQ0
@Wordsarewordz - Words are words
Oh what’s this?
@Wordsarewordz - Words are words
New World Order Pledged To Jews - NY Times October 6th, 1940. https://t.co/7Q2c9TzvnJ
@Wordsarewordz - Words are words
Since this video got more eyes than expected, debunk all of this, Holocaust believers & jew lovers.
@Wordsarewordz - Words are words
“Many Israelis feel offended by the way in which the Holocaust is exploited in the Diaspora. They even feel ashamed that the Holocaust has become a civil religion for Jews in the United States.” “There’s no business like the Shoa business.” -Jacobo Timerman, a jewish man. https://t.co/SJdE1N4H6K
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared the results of a poll showing that 83% of participants doubt the Holocaust narrative, claiming that the figure of 6 million Jewish deaths is a lie. I argue that history has been manipulated through propaganda, censorship, and laws against questioning the established narrative. I referenced a CIA document suggesting a cover-up of Jewish population data post-WWII and provided statistics indicating an increase in the Jewish population during the 1930s. I encourage others to critically examine their beliefs and seek the truth.
@TheOfficial1984 - 1984
💥FINAL POLL RESULT💥 72,233 PEOPLE VOTED 83% of people DO NOT believe that 6 million jews were k¡lled in the holocaust and are now criminals in 19 different countries as a result of that belief. 17% of you are either dumb, jewish, both, or still severely brainwashed from the vast amount of propaganda you've been fed your entire life. So, in an attempt to reach the latter, I'm going to break down why the overwhelming majority no longer believe the LIE. ---------------- The phrase "6 MILLION JEWS D€AD" has been used over 245 times from 1865 to 1945 and appears in multiple newspapers, articles, and books up to 80 years PRIOR to the holocaust. NOT ONCE HAS IT EVER BEEN TRUE.
@TheOfficial1984 - 1984
History, as it has been told to us, is a LIE. Through atrocity propaganda and fabricated evidence, they have weaponized your compassion against your ability to think logically and rationally. They have passed laws to criminalize any questioning of the narrative and have spent billions of dollars to conceal the lie. For 80 years, their full spectrum dominance over the media, their concealment and manipulation of evidence, and censorship of all available information has kept your mind in chains....unable to see the truth and a slave to the lie. "Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. The process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right. Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past." -George Orwell Yet, three things can not be long hidden: the sun, the moon, and the truth. The time to wake up is NOW.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The International Red Cross had complete access to the camps, estimating total deaths around 271,000-290,000, with about half being Jewish. A 1650-page Red Cross report never mentioned gas chambers. Internees were categorized as Poles, Jews, Russians, and political prisoners. Jews comprised less than 40% of Auschwitz, around 12% of Dachau, and about 30% of Buchenwald.
Auschwitz death books indicate 29,000 Jews died there; potentially 40,000 if unregistered deaths are included. The Auschwitz death toll is less than the 4,000,000 figure on the Birkenau plaque.
The number of dead at Auschwitz was revised in 1989 from 4,100,000 to 1,000,000. Majdanek's death toll was revised in 2005 from 2,000,000 to 78,000, yet the official 6,000,000 Holocaust death toll remained unchanged.
The Jewish World Almanac recorded an increase in the world Jewish population between 1933 and 1948, from 15,315,000 to 15,753,000.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Officials from the International Red Cross visited the camps regularly and had complete access to the camps, documented everything, and estimated the total dead from all the camps to be around 271,000 to 290,000. About half of these dead were Jewish. So we are now talking about some 150 to 200000 Jews that died in the German camps, primarily of disease. In the 1650 page Red Cross report, there was never a mention of any gas chambers. There basically were 4 categories interned during the war, Poles, Jews, Russians, and political prisoners, sometimes alluded to as Germans.
Jews made up less than 40% of Auschwitz, only around 12% of Dachau, and only around 30% of Buchenwald.
Speaker 1: You've got, for example, the death books of Auschwitz, which are the most reliable source. The Soviets confiscated all the information about, nights and death of people living in Auschwitz when they liberated the camp, and those were finally published in the 19 nineties. And those give you a total What is it? 29,000 Jews die in Auschwitz throughout the world. Okay?
And you've got somewhat more Catholics die. You've got more Catholics and Jews dying in Auschwitz. And if you wanna say, oh, there's some missing data there, some Jews not registered who died, and so on, well, you can put it up at very most, I would say, 4 40,000 Jews die dying at Auschwitz. Now I don't allow it to go any higher than that. And that is a 100 times less than the 4,000,000 plaque at Birkenau after the war.
Soviets put that, totally absurd figure.
Speaker 0: Number of dead at Auschwitz was revised in 1989 from 4,100,000 down to 1,000,000. Upon capture by the Soviet Union, original propaganda also claimed that 2,000,000 were murdered in Majdanek, which included 7 homicidal gas chambers. 5 of these 7 have been admitted to never even assert as homicidal gas chambers. Number of dead at Majdanek was revised in 2,005 from 2,000,000 to 78,000, but somehow, the official account of 6,000,000 dead remained unchanged. So what is 6,000,000 minus 4,000,000, minus 2,000,000?
The Holocaust is the only claimed genocide where millions can be reduced from the total claimed to be killed, but the total figure always remains 6000000. Several sources, including the World Almanac, Red Cross documentation, the New York Times and the Chambers Encyclopedia shows that the Jewish population recorded does not reflect the testimonials given on the Holocaust. The Jewish World Almanac has been regarded as the absolute most authentic and trustworthy source for the world's Jewish population numbers. And according to the World Almanac, the world population of Jews increased between 1933 1948 from 15,315,000 to 15,753,000.
@TheOfficial1984 - 1984
A 1976 CIA document released in 2004 states that the US Census Bureau covered up the real Jewish population in USA after WW2, at the request of Jewish groups, to protect the holocaust narrative. https://t.co/xpjnAJMbzI
@TheOfficial1984 - 1984
FROM THE JEWISH WORLD ALMANAC: The total jewish population in 1933: 15,315,359 The total jewish population in 1948: 15,753,638 The total jewish population from 1933-1938 INCREASED 438,279 PEOPLE. https://t.co/fMANPrezeD
@TheOfficial1984 - 1984
If you do not know WHY you believe what you believe... you have been BRAINWASHED. Make an effort to prove yourself wrong. https://t.co/P1dR9z9GOv
reSee.it AI Summary
I explored the trials of Ernst Zündel, a controversial figure charged with spreading false news about the Holocaust. His legal battles in the 1980s involved significant testimonies from various witnesses, including Holocaust experts who admitted a lack of concrete evidence for mass extermination orders and gas chambers. Zündel's defense included claims of censorship and manipulation of historical narratives. He argued for free speech, while facing threats and violence from opposing groups. Ultimately, I reflected on the importance of questioning established beliefs and seeking the truth.
@TheOfficial1984 - 1984
THE HOLOCAUST ON TRIAL THE SAGA OF ERNST ZÜNDEL Ernst Zündel (1939-2017) was a German-born publisher, author, and civil rights activist. In 1983, Sabina Citron, founder of the Canadian holocaust remembrance association, filed a private complaint before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal against Zündel for a 28 page pamphlet he had published in 1977 called "Did 6 Million Really Die?" In 1984, the Ontario government joined the criminal proceedings against Zündel based on Citron's complaint, and Zündel underwent two criminal trials in 1985 and 1988 for the charge of "spreading false news." To wage the legal battle that was forced upon him, Zundel brought together an impressive all-star international team of researchers, historians, scientists, legal specialists, scholars, and experts to aid in his defense. As a result of the two trials, an enormous quantity of evidence and testimony challenging the prevailing historical narrative was presented to the court under oath and thereby made part of the permanent public record. This thread will shed light on the evidence, testimony, and explosive revelations from his trials.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ernst Zundel claims there were no gas chambers or mass murder of Jews in Nazi concentration camps, and that the Holocaust is a hoax invented by Zionists to obtain war reparations and establish Israel. He keeps a scale model of Auschwitz, claiming the ovens were only for typhus victims.
Zundel denies being anti-Semitic but expresses suspicion of some Jews, calling them "diabolical liars" and manipulators with immense power in the media. Sabine Cittron, a Holocaust survivor, filed charges against Zundel under section 177 of the criminal code. Zundel maintains his innocence, viewing the charges as part of a struggle to rehabilitate the Germans, and states that Germans did not kill 6,000,000 Jews.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is Zundel's message. There were no gas chambers in Nazi concentration camps. There was no mass murder of European Jews. The Holocaust is a hoax, dreamed up after the 2nd World War by Zionists who wanted war reparation, money to establish the state of Israel. In his house, Zundel keeps an elaborate scale model of the Auschwitz concentration camp.
Ovens are included, but Zundel says they were used only to burn the bodies of typhus victims. Zundel denies he is anti Semitic, but he is, to say the least, highly suspicious of many Jews.
Speaker 1: Because some of them are diabolical liars, exploiters of their own people's suffering, real and imagined. They are manipulators, some of them.
Speaker 0: And their power.
Speaker 1: But because they have amassed an immense power, especially in the media, they have a terrible power to distort and a terrible power to create, mister. Charges under a little known criminal code, section 177, were laid against Zendo by Oshawa survivor and founder of the Canadian Holocaust Remembrance Association, Sabine Cittron. I'm innocent, as always. No. Actually, this is I consider this just one more step in this struggle to have the Germans rehabilitated.
I'm a German. I don't think that the Germans killed 6,000,000
@TheOfficial1984 - 1984
Prior to the trial, the jewish defense league, now classified as a terrorist organization, protested the trial, made numerous threats on Zündel's life, and planted a pipe bomb at his house in an attempt to silence his testimony from seeing the light of day. https://t.co/TE0azViFtC
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ernst Zundel claims the Jewish Defense League is harassing him and threatening to kill him in various ways. He says he is only a threat to those who can't stand democratic debate or the truth. The JDL states they are simply carrying out surveillance, not harassment.
Early this morning, an explosion occurred at Zundel's Toronto home. Police suspect a pipe bomb caused minimal damage to the building and a car, totaling about $2,000. Nearby homes and vehicles were also slightly damaged.
Zundel publishes material suggesting the holocaust was a hoax and is a collector of Nazi memorabilia. A caller claiming to be part of the People's Liberation Movement for the Jewish Defense League told City Pulse his group planted the bomb. The JDL representative claims to have never heard of such organization, but understands what would motivate people to carry out such an action. Zundel's home features security devices, like outdoor video cameras, round the clock security guards, iron bars, search lights, and barbed wire.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ernst Zandl is in a state of siege. Jewish Defense League is out to get him with a harassment campaign that he calls terrorism. What did they say? They're gonna kill me. I have my choice to where I want to go.
I can be hacked to death. I can be ice pick to death. I can have my testicles cut off. Anything. Mister Zendel produced some tape threads to prove his point.
It came from the JBL. I'm only a threat to those people who can't stand democratic debate or the
Speaker 1: truth. We are not harassing, this person. We are simply carrying on surveillance.
Speaker 2: Early this morning, there was an explosion at
Speaker 3: the home of Toronto publisher, Ernst Zundel. Metro police believe a pipe bomb is behind the blast.
Speaker 4: It happened just before 4:30 this morning. A device which police believed to be a pipe bomb exploded behind a garage at 206 Carlton Street. That address is the residence of publisher Ernst Zundel. Damage to the building and the car inside was minimal, totaling about $2,000. Homes and vehicles nearby were also damaged slightly by flying metal and wood.
This morning's bombing is being investigated by 51 division and the bomb squad. Police say they have a number of possible suspects.
Speaker 0: Basically, it sounded like a powerful blast going off or a or a truck or a bus or a fire engine backfiring. And then when he got here, there was nothing but smoke and flames and stuff like that.
Speaker 5: The bomb caused about $2,000 damage to Zundal's garage, his car, as well as 3 other cars parked 15 feet away.
Speaker 0: My dad killed me. I was, you know, I don't die in any of it.
Speaker 5: Zundal, a collector of Nazi memorabilia, has published material suggesting the holocaust was a hoax. It is a man with many enemies.
Speaker 0: With also many friends. We here
Speaker 5: at City Pulse received a phone call late last night from someone claiming to be a part of a group called the People's Liberation Movement for the Jewish Defense League. The caller told us his group planted
Speaker 1: the bomb. I have never heard of any such organization. We did not have anything to do with the bombing of El Salvador. However, I could certainly understand what would motivate some people to carry out such an action.
Speaker 0: Maya Halevi, I would have expected an answer like that.
Speaker 1: I wish for the day when Ernst Zundel's operation will be totally dismantled.
Speaker 5: I
Speaker 0: think that'll come long after his operation has been dismantled, I'm sure.
Speaker 5: Zundel has obviously been expecting trouble of some sort. His home features numerous security devices, like outdoor video cameras with monitors inside the house, round the clock security guards, iron bars, search lights, and barbed wire.
Speaker 0: If it's a warning, it, has made no impression on me whatsoever.
@TheOfficial1984 - 1984
Zündel filed a pre-trial motion that sought to drop the charges on the basis of free speech. The judge denied the motion, claiming, "Such freedoms were not absolute, and there wasn't an unbridled right to say what you think." https://t.co/3B1fl7YEC6
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jury selection began after Judge Hew Locke denied two defense requests. Zundel wanted the charges dropped based on Canadian Charter free speech guarantees, but Locke stated these freedoms aren't absolute.
Zundel's lawyer, Douglas Christie, sought to exclude Jews and Freemasons from the jury due to allegations against them in Zundel's publications, arguing they couldn't be impartial. Judge Locke denied Christie's request to ask prospective jurors nine questions about the Holocaust. Locke stated banning Jews and Freemasons would prevent a large portion of society from participating and that Zundel can't tailor the jury.
Christie hoped for an impartial jury, questioning if his client would receive a fair trial. One speaker stated it is difficult to get an impartial jury on a controversial question like the one at issue.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jury selection began today after Judge Hew Locke turned down 2 defense requests. Arrived to hear the judge's rulings on 2 pretrial motions. Mr. Zundel had wanted the judge to drop the charges on the basis of the Canadian Charter's guarantees of free speech and opinion. However, Judge Hewlock threw out that request saying such freedoms are not absolute, but there isn't an unbridled right to say what you think.
Mister Zundel's other request involved the questions his lawyer wanted to put to prospective jurors. As the charges involve publications containing allegations against Jews and Freemasons, defense lawyer Douglas Christie wanted to keep both groups off the jury. He felt they wouldn't be able to provide impartial judgment in such a case. Before jury selection began, judge Hugh Locke denied a request by defense lawyer Doug Christie to put 9 questions about the holocaust to prospective jurors. The judge also ruled banning Jews and freemasons from the jury would prevent a large portion of society from taking part in the trial.
Judge Locke said about Zundel, he can't tailor his own jury to suit himself. Defense lawyer Christie said he hoped to ensure an impartial jury. He wanted to ask possible jurors if they are Jewish, if they believe gas chambers were used to kill Jews during World War 2. Christie wondered if his client will get a fair trial.
Speaker 1: I think it it is very difficult to get an impartial jury on a controversial question like the one that's an issue here. We'll have to deal with the matter as it arrives.
@TheOfficial1984 - 1984
Raul Hillberg, star witness for the prosecution and foremost holocaust expert, admitted under oath that "no written record exists that h|tler ever ordered the mass extermination of the jews" and that there is "no single report about gas chambers or correspondence to prove it" https://t.co/s1yrbWyUVQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
During the trial of Ernst Zundel, the defense lawyer challenged Holocaust expert Dr. Raul Hilberg's testimony, questioning his belief that Adolf Hitler personally ordered the extermination of Jews. Hilberg stated Hitler's order was verbal, with the exact wording unknown, calling it a gap in history.
The defense lawyer questioned Hilberg's reliance on a former SS officer's claims, some of which were omitted from Hilberg's book due to their incredibility, such as Hitler witnessing gassings and the claim that 25,000,000 Jews were killed. Hilberg admitted there is no single report proving the existence of gas chambers in Nazi concentration camps, nor correspondence to prove it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The lawyer representing Ernst Zundel today began challenging some of the testimony given this week by an expert on the Holocaust. The cross examination questions several of the man's statements, including his belief that Adolf Hitler personally ordered the extermination of Jews.
Speaker 1: The crown's expert witness, doctor Raul Hilberg, was back on the stand today where he was called to defend many of the conclusions he's made on the Holocaust during 40 years of research. Defense lawyer Doug Christie asked doctor Hilberg how he came to the belief that Adolf Hitler personally issued the annihilation order. The doctor replied, Hitler's order was verbal and thus no one knows the correct wording. It's one of the gaps in history, Hilberg said.
Speaker 2: One of the main questions has been, did the Germans deliberately intend to kill all Jews, and did Hitler give the order for such a plan? In court, defense lawyer Doug Christie questioned the fact that the professor quoted a former SS officer 10 times in a book the professor wrote about the Holocaust. Christie said the officer made what the lawyer called incredible claims, like claiming that Hitler witnessed some gassings and that 25,000,000 Jews were killed by the Germans. Professor Hilberg admitted he left out the officer's incredible points in his book.
Speaker 0: A recognized expert on the holocaust today admitted there is no single report that shows the existence of gas chambers in Nazi concentration camps. Doctor Raul Hilberg was testifying for the 3rd day at the trial of Ernst Zundel.
Speaker 1: Was there a report that anyone was gassed? Hilberg, there's no single report about gas chambers. I can't swear there's correspondence to prove it.
@TheOfficial1984 - 1984
Arnold Friedman, a key witness to the prosecution, who was at Auschwitz, testified he "saw prisoners marched towards the gas chambers and saw smoke and flames rise from the chimney" Upon cross examination, he stated he "never actually witnessed any mass executions or gassings." https://t.co/JBiam2jI99
Video Transcript AI Summary
Christie cross-examined witness Arnold Friedman about his nine-month stay at Auschwitz. Friedman testified he watched prisoners march toward the crematorium and saw smoke and flames from the smokestack.
Under cross-examination, Friedman admitted he never witnessed mass executions and only guessed at what happened. He agreed the prisoners could have been marching out of the camp.
Christie suggested many bodies burned at Auschwitz were Jews who died of disease and starvation. He questioned Friedman about what he saw and knew about crematoriums, suggesting cremation creates no such smoke or flames as Friedman described. Christie is trying to prove Zundel has reason to question accepted beliefs about the holocaust.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In a point by point cross examination, Christie attempted to pick apart the testimony of one of the crown's key witnesses as he questioned what the man saw during a 9 month stay at the Auschwitz concentration camp. On the stand for the second day, 56 year old Arnold Friedman told the court how he watched columns of prisoners march toward the Auschwitz crematorium. Later, he watched smoke and flames pour from the building's smokestack. But under cross examination, Friedman was forced to admit he had never witnessed mass executions. He only guessed at what happened.
He agreed that the columns of prisoners could have been marching out of the camp through a gate next to the crematorium. Christie is out to prove that Zundel has reason to question the widely accepted beliefs about the holocaust. He suggested to Friedman that many of the bodies burned at Auschwitz were those of Jews who died of disease and starvation.
Speaker 1: Sundel's lawyer, British Columbia attorney Douglas Christie, vigorously cross examined Friedman about exactly what he saw and what he knew about crematoriums. He suggested to Friedman, cremation creates no such smoke or flames as he described.
@TheOfficial1984 - 1984
Rudolph Vrba, an Auschwitz escapee, wrote in his memoir that 12,000 jews were killed per day in the camp and he had personally witnessed the gassings. He then testified that his memoir was dramatized and served as an "artistic representation rather than a historical event." https://t.co/4CAOjGX4cD
Video Transcript AI Summary
Rudolf Verba, an Auschwitz escapee, testified about the death camp in the Ernst Zundel trial. Zundel's lawyer, Doug Christie, challenged Verba's 1964 memoir, "I Cannot Forgive," which claimed Auschwitz had a killing capacity of 12,000 per day, double his 1944 report. Verba admitted to dramatizing incidents in the book, calling it an artistic representation.
Christie questioned Verba about a human gassing demonstration for Heinrich Himmler described in the book. Verba stated the book was literature, not history. Death estimates for Auschwitz varied, with Verba estimating 2.5 million, a document expert claiming 1 million, and the Polish government alleging 4 million. Christie accused Verba of using memory techniques to maintain consistent lies regarding his mental record of daily deaths. Christie challenged Verba's memory and motives, questioning why his estimate of deaths at the camp doubled in his book compared to initial statements. Verba admitted his book was a compilation of eyewitness reports.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Rudolf Verba, an escapee from Auschwitz, has testified with uncanny precision about what went on in the death camp. Today, the lawyer for Ernst Zundel tested that memory. Doug Christie challenged a memoir that Verba wrote in 1964, which said, among other things, that Auschwitz had a killing capacity of 12,000 a day. This is twice what Verba had reported to authorities after his escape in 1944. Verba admitted that incidents in the book were dramatized.
He called it an artistic picture of an event. Doug Christie read from Verba's 1964 death camp memoirs called I cannot forgive. Among the anecdotes, a human gassing demonstration for SS chief Heinrich Himmler. Pressed about the book's accuracy, Verba said it was a work of literature rather than a history book. The jury in the Zundel trial has heard a lot of different death estimates for Auschwitz.
Verba himself calculates a grand total of 2a half 1000000. A previous document expert testified 1,000,000. And the Polish government says 4,000,000. No one knows for sure. Verba was telling the court how he kept a mental record of how many Jews went into the Auschwitz death ovens every day.
Christie called it a memory technique to keep your lies straight.
Speaker 1: A survivor of Auschwitz underwent a tough day of cross examination today in Toronto. Verba found himself under attack for what he claims he saw.
Speaker 2: Zandl's lawyer, Douglas Christie, spent the day challenging Verba's memory and his motives. Especially what Verba claims he actually saw. The 2 of them engaged in verbal combat throughout the cross examination. Christie wanted to know why Verba's estimate of the number of Jews killed at the camp doubled from his initial statements given after the war and from the claim he made in his book 20 years later. Vrba admitted that his book entitled I cannot forgive was a compilation of many eyewitness reports.
@TheOfficial1984 - 1984
Robert Faurisson, a professor of literature, testified for the defense that there was no physical evidence of gas chambers, mass execution orders, 6 million was a lie, and that the structures that were currently standing at the camps were actually reconstructions. https://t.co/0J9g0UnOAP
Video Transcript AI Summary
Professor Robert Faurisson testified in defense of Ernst Zundel, stating his research led him to believe the Holocaust and gas chambers are historical lies. He recalled finding no soot on a crematorium smokestack at Auschwitz, which he claimed was a reconstruction.
Another scholar testified that the number of Jewish deaths in World War II is far less than commonly believed. Faurisson disputed the figure of 6,000,000 Jewish deaths, claiming there's no proof of even one gas chamber and estimating casualties between 200,000 and 350,000, citing the International Tracing Service as his source.
Faurisson testified that the "final solution" was a territorial solution, not extermination, and the existence of camp survivors disproves a policy of working Jews to death. He stated there's no document with Hitler's signature ordering mass murder, attributing the belief that 6,000,000 Jews died to rumors and anti-German propaganda. He accused the state of Israel and international Zionists of perpetrating this "historical lie" for financial gain from German reparations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Christie used his first defense witness to try to substantiate doubts. Professor Robert Faurisson of France's Lyon University told the court his research has convinced him the gas chambers and the holocaust are historical lies. Florissant recalled a visit to Auschwitz when he ran his finger across the smokestack of a crematorium and found no soot. His investigation revealed that the crematorium was a reconstruction, not the original.
Speaker 1: It was another day of startling testimony at the trial of Toronto publisher, Ernst Zundel. The court heard from a professor of literature who spoke out in defense of Zundel. The scholar said the number of Jews who died in World War 2 is nowhere near what we've all been led to believe.
Speaker 2: Doctor Robert Faurisson disputes the widely held belief that 6,000,000 Jews were killed during World War 2. Said Faurisson in court, it's impossible to sustain any more these fantastic figures. There is not even the slightest proof of even one gas chamber. Porrason testified he believed the casualty figures ranged between 200,350,000. He quoted his source for that estimate as the international tracing service, a group that tries to track down Jews who were displaced during the war.
Earlier in the day, Forreston testified he believed the final solution was a territorial solution, not an extermination. Griffin's asked about the testimony of camp survivors who watched fellow inmates being worked to death. Foresall said the fact that there were survivors showed there was no direct policy to work Jews to death.
Speaker 3: Morrison calmly told the jury that there is no document with Hitler's signature calling for the mass murder of Jews. He said rumors and anti German propaganda led to what he calls the great historical lie that 6,000,000 Jews died. Griffiths, who committed this fraud? Forrester, the state of Israel and international Zionists. Griffiths, for what purpose?
Forrester said for the financial remuneration, the German government was forced to pay.
@TheOfficial1984 - 1984
Russell Barton testified on behalf of the defense that during his time stationed with the Red Cross at the Bergen Belson camp,, he saw no evidence to support a German policy of systematic extermination and testified that the deaths were primarily a result of starvation and typhus https://t.co/89HBP9yJpi
Video Transcript AI Summary
After the war, psychiatrist Dr. Russell Bart volunteered at the Bergen Belsen camp for the Red Cross. Upon arrival with the liberating forces, he witnessed 500 daily deaths from starvation and disease. Dr. Barton concluded these deaths did not stem from a deliberate German extermination policy. He testified that he faced widespread criticism for challenging the prevailing view of intentional German killings. He stated some inmates died when British soldiers gave them food they couldn't digest.
English psychiatrist Dr. Russell Barton was at Belsen shortly after liberation. Questioned by Zundel's lawyer, he testified that he did not believe the deaths resulted from planned extermination.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Another defense witness was doctor Russell Bart, a psychiatrist who worked as a Red Cross volunteer in the Bergen Belsen camp after the war. When he arrived with the liberating forces, 500 inmates a day were dying of starvation and disease. He concluded that those deaths were not part of a deliberate German policy of extermination. Doctor Barton testified that he was widely criticized for going against the prevailing view that the Germans purposely caused the deaths. He told the court that some of the inmates even died when British soldiers unknowingly gave them food they couldn't digest.
Speaker 1: Doctor Russell Barton, an English psychiatrist, was in Belsen concentration camp shortly after it was liberated. Questioned by mister Zundel's lawyer, he said he didn't believe the deaths he saw resulted from planned extermination.
@TheOfficial1984 - 1984
Thies Christophersen was sent to Auschwitz as ascientist researching the development of synthetic rubber. Working side by side with the inmates, Christophersen testified that Auschwitz was a clean and happy work camp, and there was no evidence whatsoever of gas chambers. https://t.co/vFPSXjsDZu
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the afternoon, a former German army officer, Theiss Christofferson, testified for the defense. Christofferson was posted to Auschwitz in 1944. He claimed he only heard of mass Jewish deaths there after the war and that he never saw evidence of mass gassings.
Christofferson testified that Auschwitz was a clean and happy work camp. He stated he was there in 1944 studying the production of synthetic rubber and talked to inmates almost daily. Testifying through an interpreter, Christofferson said the air at Auschwitz was very clean, with no smell of burning flesh and no evidence of gas chambers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the afternoon, a former German army officer arrived to testify for the defense. Theiss Christofferson was posted to Auschwitz in 1944. He said he only heard of mass Jewish deaths there after the war. He said he never saw evidence of mass gassings.
Speaker 1: As Thies Christofferson tells it, Auschwitz was a clean and happy work camp. He was there in 1944 studying the production of synthetic rubber, and he says he talked to inmates almost every day. Testifying through a German interpreter, Kristofferson said the air at Auschwitz was very clean. There was no smell of burning flesh, no evidence of gas chambers.
@TheOfficial1984 - 1984
Dr. William Lindsey, an American industrial chemist, testified that zyclon B was used for delousing both prisoners and officers, and its application as a mass gassing agent was a physical impossibility. https://t.co/2VCK3TkHji
Video Transcript AI Summary
American industrial chemist Dr. William Lindsey testified about Zyklon B, stating its dangerous properties necessitate careful handling.
Regarding a previous witness's claim of handling corpses shortly after gassing, Dr. Lindsey stated this was highly unlikely. He claimed mass gassings, as described, were impossible and that no one was willfully killed with Zyklon B in this manner.
Dr. Lindsey also disputed earlier testimony about flames constantly emanating from crematoria chimneys, asserting such intense heat would cause the chimneys to collapse.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Later, another defense witness, Doctor. William Lindsey, an American industrial chemist, took the stand. He described the properties of Ziklon B, hydrogen cyanide, the gas said to have been used to kill Jews at Auschwitz and at other camps. Doctor. Lindsay said what a dangerous gas cyclone b was and how carefully it had to be handled.
Defense counsel Douglas Christie then mentioned an earlier witness who had claimed to have handled corpses shortly after the victims had been gassed. Doctor. Lindsay said this was highly unlikely. Asked by mister Christie about mass gassings, doctor Lindsay said it was impossible for it to have happened the way it's described. No one was willfully killed with Ziklon B in this manner.
Doctor Lindsey also suggested that earlier testimony concerning flames, day and night shooting out of crematoria chimneys was wrong. He said this would cause a brick and mortar chimney to fall apart.
@TheOfficial1984 - 1984
Ditlieb Felderer testified on behalf of the defense that during his 27 visits to Auschwitz, he witnessed an Olympic sized swimming pool, a banquet room, a sauna, a dance hall, and an orchestra that would perform for the inmates. He described the alleged gas chambers as a fake. https://t.co/lCLSUB2nnu
Video Transcript AI Summary
A defense witness, Ditley Felderer of Sweden, likened himself to Voltaire in defending free speech. He claimed that during 27 visits to Auschwitz, he found an Olympic-sized swimming pool, a banquet room, a sauna, and a dance hall where prisoner orchestras performed. He characterized a crematorium as a fake, like a Hollywood stage set. Ernst Zindel has used Felderer's research in his publications. During cross-examination, Felderer was made to read from leaflets for which he had been prosecuted in Sweden, which mock the holocaust and make fun of gassings.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Meanwhile, a defense witness, Ditley Felderer of Sweden compared himself to Voltaire upholding the right of free speech. He said that in his 27 visits to Auschwitz in recent years, he found an Olympic sized swimming pool, a banquet room, a sauna, even a dance hall where prisoners orchestras played for inmates. He described a crematorium as a Hollywood stage place, a fake. Ernst Zindel has used some of Felderer's research in his own publications. In cross examination, Felderer was made to read from some of his leaflets for which he's been prosecuted in Sweden.
They mock the holocaust and make fun of gassings.
@TheOfficial1984 - 1984
Jewish Prof. Roger G. Dommergue gave written testimony that was presented to the court on behalf of the defense that all that was really known is that 6 million people that didn't exist, died in gas chambers that nobody ever saw, on orders that were never given. https://t.co/3IRH1MrvNl
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states they belong to an important international Jewish family and their passion is truth. They claim the Holocaust is a complete fake, based on what they describe as a simple technical arithmetic problem solvable by a child.
They assert any chemist knows you can't gas 1,000 or 2,000 people at a time with hydrocyanic acid. They cite the American Jewish Yearbook as stating there were 3,003,000 Jews in occupied Europe in 1942, questioning how 6,000,000 Jews could have been killed when only 3,000,000 existed.
The speaker contrasts logic and facts with illogic and propaganda, stating they hate propaganda and value truth above all else.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I belong to a very important international Jewish family from by my mother. And I've been very, very interested. And and my only passion, except the piano, is truth. That's why in spite of, the way that my congenials treat you, I don't want to be take part in this, in this real absolute life because I've been working on your case and for his own case these last 6 or 7 years. And I have I know that, the problem for instance of the Holocaust is a is a complete fake because it's very easy to know because it's a it's a simple technical arithmetic problem, which could be solved by a child in a high school.
Now any chemist know that you can't, gas people with cyanide acid. Let's call that in English. Hydrogenic acid. Yeah. Hyprocyanic acid.
Hydrosonic acid. 1,000 or 2,000 people at the time. It's well known. And, even the most important American Jewish newspaper, like the American Jewish Yearbook, said that there was 3,003,000 Jews, in occupied Europe in 1942. So I don't see how they could have killed 6,000,000 Jews when there was only 3,000,000.
So I think anybody can see that. So for you, it's a question of logic versus illogic. Of truth, logic, of course. Or facts versus propaganda. Facts versus propaganda.
I thought I hate propaganda. Even if my own mother would tell me such nonsense, I would say my own mother go to bed. Leave me alone. Yeah. What should I say to my engineers even if they are, if they are billionaires, I have nothing to do.
I don't care about the universe. Truth is interesting. That's all.
@TheOfficial1984 - 1984
Zündel took the stand and testified in his own defense. He explained to the court how his beliefs were formed through years of tireless research in search of the truth and fueled by his desire to rid the German people of the stigma that was a direct result of a historical lie. https://t.co/Dn17WOkYdR
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ernst Zindel portrayed himself as defending the reputation of Germans, which included denying the Holocaust. He arrived in Canada in 1958 and disliked the negative portrayals of Germans in media. Zindel initially believed 6 million Jews were killed, but changed his view after extensive research. He dismissed Holocaust atrocity stories as propaganda and claimed high death tolls in camps like Dachau were due to typhus epidemics.
Zindel stated that Dachau had no active gas chambers for humans and that most authorities now agree the gas chamber was never used. He predicted the world would eventually admit that Auschwitz also did not use gas chambers for extermination. Zindel called the Nuremberg trials Germany's darkest hour and introduced writings criticizing the trials. He likened the Holocaust to a rumor amplified over time, useful as war propaganda, but now outdated. Zindel said governments manipulate information during war and people must seek the truth to avoid mental enslavement.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ernst Zindel portrayed himself today as a man fighting for the good name of Germans. And part of that fight is the denial of the Holocaust. Zindel came to Canada in 1958. He said he found Germans slandered in print and on television. We were cowards, criminals, romantic dreamers, butchers, and colonel Klinks, the butt end of every joke, and I didn't like it.
He told the court that the Holocaust was at the center of the anti German bias. Until 1960, he believed that 6,000,000 Jews had been killed. Then after reading widely and interviewing authors around the world, he changed his mind. Referring to some of the holocaust atrocity stories, Zendel said, only someone mesmerized by propaganda could believe in such nonsense. Zindel testified that the high death toll at camps like Dachau was mostly due to typhus and those epidemics came late in the war.
There were no active gas chambers for humans, he said. The jury in the trial has seen this military film alleging that a shower at Dachau was used to gas Jews with cycloneb gas. Zindal said that most authorities, including officials at Dachau today, now say that the gas chamber was never used. It took 20 years, he said, to admit that Dachau, Buchenwald, and Bergen Belsen did not have gas chambers, he said. In time, the world would have to admit that Auschwitz and other eastern camps also did not use gas for human extermination.
Zindl also said that the postwar Nuremberg trials were Germany's darkest hour, an example of human debasement. Through his lawyer Doug Christie, Zindl introduced the writings of American politicians and jurists of the 19 forties who criticized the trials as a blot on American justice. Zindel said the holocaust is like a rumor that grows wilder each time it's repeated through each generation. He said it served well as war propaganda, but 40 years later, it is time to put that propaganda aside.
Speaker 1: Thundel told the jury that we must now realize that every government manipulates information and has censorship in times of war, and that we owe it to ourselves to be informed of the truth or we will be mental slaves even after the war is over.
@TheOfficial1984 - 1984
Ivan Legacé, a cremation expert, testified for the defense. He refuted that 4400 bodies were being cremated daily at Auschwitz, claiming it was "preposterous and outside the realm of reality." He stated that the maximum possible number of cremations daily was 184 https://t.co/tU0QthH48O
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ivan Lageis, an expert in crematorium practices, testified about his experience as an embalmer, funeral director, and crematory manager/operator. He had worked with over 10,000 bodies and personally cremated over 1,000.
Lageis used flowcharts and fire bricks to explain the cremation process. He then addressed claims about cremation capacity at Auschwitz-Birkenau. Referencing Raoul Hilberg's estimate of over 4,400 bodies per day in 46 retorts, Lageis stated this was preposterous. Based on his experience, he testified that a maximum of 184 bodies per day would have been possible.
Regarding claims of 6,000-24,000 cremations per day, Lageis stated that such claims were irresponsible and physically unrealistic. He concluded that science dares to say the Holocaust, as we have heard it, is basically a hoax.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ivan Lageis was tendered as an expert in the practical aspects of crematorium practice. Lageis worked as a professional embalmer funeral director and crematory manager and operator at the Bow Valley Crematorium in Calgary, Alberta. He had completed 2.5 year funeral services program at Humber College in Ontario, and in 1979 obtained his diploma in Ontario license. In 1983, he obtained his Alberta license. In the course of his career, Lagais had dealt with over 10,000 bodies in his work and had cremated over 1,000 bodies himself.
The work involved bodies in a variety of physical conditions from accident and fire victims to people who died of highly contagious diseases. Now he used flowcharts to explain to the jury, which are for a layman, the process of cremation. He brought along fire bricks, and he let them feel it and touch it, lift it. In order to show what kind of material was involved. He also pointed out that these fire bricks are extremely expensive, costing up to $60 for 1 brick.
And then he was asked about Holocaust claims of numbers of cremations at Auschwitz Birkenau and Lageis commented on Raoul Hilberg's claiming the destruction of European Jews, 2nd edition, page 978, with respect to the capacities of the 46 retorts in the 4 crematories at Wirgenau and he said, quoting Doctor. Hilberg, the theoretical daily capacity of the 4 Wirgenau crematory was somewhat over 4,400 persons or cadavers, but with breakdowns and slowdowns, the practical limit was almost always lower. Lagasse stated that this claim was preposterous and beyond the realm of reality to claim that 46 retorts could cremate over 4,400 bodies in a day was ludicrous. Based on his own experience, Laguerre testified that it would only have been possible to cremate a maximum of 184 bodies a day in Bergenau. And then he was asked by the defense attorney, my defense attorney, Di Kristi, about Riedlinger who claimed 6,000 a day to be cremated, others who claimed 8,000 people were burned.
And some of them said 24,000 were handled a day. To this, Ivan Lagaest, the Canadian crematory expert says, it was irresponsible. These people were irresponsible with their facts because this doesn't even begin to end the reality at all. It is just physically unrealistic. Physically unrealistic.
In other words, science dares to say the Holocaust, as we have heard it, is basically a hoax.
@TheOfficial1984 - 1984
Zündel commissioned Fred Leuchter, a gas chamber expert, to travel to Auschwitz, Treblinka and Majdanek to conduct a forensic analysis of the alleged gas chambers. He sampled the soil and brick, took measurements, drew floorplans, and sent the samples to a lab for analysis. https://t.co/XeZCb2KgEa
Video Transcript AI Summary
A team including an American gas chamber expert, Fred Leuchter, went behind the Iron Curtain to investigate alleged gas chambers in Auschwitz Birkenau and Majdanek. The team included translators, filmmakers, and draftsmen. They took soil, rock, and concrete samples, documenting everything to prevent claims of contamination or tampering.
Each alleged gas chamber was measured, and detailed architectural drawings were made, noting the sample locations. The samples were sent to the Ashland laboratory in Massachusetts for testing. The lab was unaware of the samples' origins to ensure unbiased analysis. The lab director analyzed the samples, and the results proved to be a sensation in court.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I was planning to send an American gas chamber expert, an execution expert called Fred Leuchter behind the then still existing iron curtain to go with an entire team of experts to investigate the alleged gas chambers in Auschwitz Birkenau and Majdanek. And this team did call translators, filmmakers, draftsmen, and so on. And they went to these sites, and they took soil samples, rock samples, concrete samples. They scraped these samples into plastic bags scientifically with rubber gloves, facial masks that there could be no claim for for contamination and documented on each little sample bag, filmed, photographed with an eyewitness present. There's a be no claim of tampering and dated those samples and had compasses so that we knew exactly from where these samples were taken.
Each gas chamber or alleged gas chamber was painstakingly measured and it was noted down is for the first time detailed drawings were made architectural type drawings and the location where the samples were taken were noted in those drawings. So when they came back with these samples after some pretty adventurous times to the United States, they submitted these samples to a very famous laboratory in Massachusetts, the Ashland laboratory, and these people did a test on those samples. They didn't know that these were Auschwitz samples or Majdanek samples or Birkenau samples. They thought they were doing some kind of an industrial accident sample. We had to do this because we did not want to have these samples put into question later on, we wanted to have absolutely neutral person, unbiased persons doing this stuff.
As was our fortune, the director of the lab did the samples himself in conjunction naturally with some lab personnel, and they proved to be a sensation in my court case.
@TheOfficial1984 - 1984
Fred Leuchter's explosive report compiled from his forensic analysis of the alleged gas chambers and gave irrefutable proof that the chambers were incapable of supporting hydrogen cyanide gas for the purpose of mass execution and HAD NEVER BEEN USED AS GAS CHAMBERS https://t.co/KfAltgr9Df
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states that prior to inspecting facilities, they agreed to clearly report whether the facilities could have sustained gas executions. They brought standard equipment for prison surveys, including a draftsman for measurements. A photographer documented forensic samples taken from Birkenau and alleged gas execution rooms. Samples were tested to confirm visual inspections indicating the facilities never contained hydrogen cyanide.
The speaker determined the facilities were not and could not have been gas execution facilities due to their design and fabrication. Requirements for facilities containing explosive and poisonous gas, such as gasketed doors, no windows, gas input/output, temperature control, and explosion-proof equipment, were absent. The buildings were brick and mortar, lacked heat and gasketed doors, and had crematories nearby. The speaker believes that operating such a facility would have resulted in the operators' deaths via gassing or explosion.
The speaker read literature and eyewitness reports to understand execution protocols. They concluded there were no valid eyewitness accounts of gassings, stating, "there are no eyewitnesses because there were no gasps."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister Zundel and his defense team, prior to my going, that if I did in fact find facilities that could have supported executions, not only whether they did did support the executions, but only whether or not they could have sustained gas executions, I would make that very clear in my report. And that is when I would testify to when I testified in court. With the exception of the video photographer, I brought the same things that I would have normally brought to a prison in the United States if I was doing a survey of their equipment. The draftsman was there to take and verify measurements. The drawings were made on-site and then reproduced when we returned to the United States to document everything we saw.
I personally made photographs and photographer, which was not a normal thing for me, was brought to document the fact that the forensic samples that I removed from the facilities, the control sample from the lawsuit facility number 1 of Birkenau, and all of the other samples from the alleged gas execution rooms were properly taken, packaged, and the use of hydrogen cyanide gas for purposes of execution or otherwise. But, additionally, it would be necessary to move remove samples, return them to the United States for testing at an independent laboratory to, in fact, confirm what my visual inspection indicated that these facilities never, in fact, contained hydrogen cyanide. Yes.
Speaker 1: What aside from the samples convinced you that these facilities could not have been used then or now as execution facilities?
Speaker 0: The samples in my mind were mainly corroborative. The reasons that I determined that these facilities were not or never could have been gas execution facilities are stated in my report. And it does it mainly is concerned with the design and fabrication of these facilities. The requirements necessary in the design of a facility that contains a highly explosive and highly poisonous gas. You must have gasketed doors, no windows, means of getting the gas in, means of getting the gas out, something for heating the gas and the air to constantly keep the right temperature, explosion proof switches, lighting facilities, etcetera.
None of these ever existed. We're talking about brick and mortar buildings without heat, with non explosion proof lighting, without gasketed doors, in some cases, without doors at all, and with crematories that opened very close or adjacent to the facility. If these facilities were used for gas execution facilities, if those persons operating the facilities didn't gas themselves to death at the same time that the executeees died, they certainly would have been blown to bits when the gas exploded from a spark arc, in a switch, the heat of a light bulb, other gas approaching and getting into the crematory furnace. I mean, it's just ludicrous to consider that these facilities could have been used as gas chambers.
Speaker 1: But we all know from reading the newspapers and watching TV that there's many holocaust survivors who say that they actually saw gassings. They describe them in minute detail, which relative it was they lost, down to the color of the corpses and the color of the smoke coming out of the chimney. How do you respond to these people?
Speaker 0: Well, one of the things that was necessary for me to do, Kurt, at the outset so I'd have an understanding of what I was doing was read the literature and alleged eyewitness reports. So I could make a determination of the protocol, which that's a fancy word that we use in terms of executions for determining, for what the actual procedure is for the execution. And I found through these investigations that there was no such a thing as an eyewitness. I have never seen a report that was written by anyone who had a valid description of what could have happened at a gas. So the long and the short of it is, there are no eyewitnesses because there were no gasps.
@TheOfficial1984 - 1984
On 8 May 1995, Zündels Toronto residence was set on fire, resulting in $400,000 in damage. A group that called itself the "Jewish Armed Resistance Movement" claimed responsibility for the arson attack. The group had ties to the JDL and Meir Halevi. https://t.co/d8ZqWxR4XQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is standing in the remains of a library in Toronto on Carlton Street, damaged by fire and water. They found a newspaper with the headline "Germany declares for peace. Adolf Hitler addressing the German nation on October 14, 1933." The speaker notes the irony, as Ed Sandall has spent 30 years advocating for peaceful solutions.
The fire was started around 5:30 AM when gasoline was poured against the front of the house. Joergen, who was in the building, escaped with the surveillance tapes. The entire 3rd floor, including the library and private borders, is destroyed. What wasn't burned is soggy, and the roof is missing in portions. The rest of the building will be assessed to determine what can be salvaged.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's about 4:30, in the afternoon here in Toronto on Carlton Street, And I'm standing in what was the library, the, reading room as many of you have known, been up here and, read some of the books that is the head up here in the past. But, so many of them now. If it wasn't, for the fire damage, it's the water damage. And it just seemed to have melted together somehow. And, as luck would have it, what do I pick up here?
Germany declares for peace. Adolf Hitler addressing the German nation on October 14, 1933. The irony about the whole thing is is basically that's what Ed Sandall has been for 30 years. You know, hoping a peaceful solution, talk it out, and never, violent aggression. And, this is what it's come to.
Sometime this morning at 5:30, gasoline poured up against the front of the house, and the house set on fire according to the surveillance tapes from, cameras. Luckily, Joergen, who was in the building at the time, managed to, get himself and the surveillance tapes out Before the building was basically engulfed, the entire 3rd floor with the library and there's private, borders behind us is basically what you see. What isn't burned is soggy. You know. The roof, is missing in portions.
The rest of it can be torn down. As for the rest of the building, we have to go through it and see what's left to be safe to start over. And I'm sure this is gonna
@TheOfficial1984 - 1984
The Zundel Prophecy https://t.co/NWLyAytvjW
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that Germany, despite its high education levels and numerous Nobel Prize winners, turned on the Jews due to the Jews displaying racist ethnocentrism, power grabbing, influence peddling, buying of politicians, and dominating public media. The speaker asserts that the percentage of Jews in Germany was higher than the percentage in the United States today. The speaker predicts that the United States will experience "Weimar conditions" and that the solutions to these conditions will mirror those that occurred in Germany.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nobody has ever analyzed why the German nation did add more Nobel Prize winners and more famous researchers and scientists and was one of the best educated countries in Europe turn on the Jews. Why did these good Germans turn on the Jews who had more Jews living amongst them than even percentage wise living in the United States today? Why was that? Because they displayed the same for racist ethnocentrism, power grabbing, influence peddling, buying of politicians, dominating of the public airwaves and the and the public media in Germany and so on that they display in United States. And I'm not much of a prophet, but that much I can say based on history that in United States, mark my word, you will have Weimar conditions and you'll have solutions to the Weimar conditions that will be very similar to what happened in Germany.
@TheOfficial1984 - 1984
Did 6 million really die? https://t.co/mfuVsx4vnE
Video Transcript AI Summary
The International Red Cross had complete access to the camps, estimating total deaths around 271,000-290,000, with about half being Jewish. A 1650-page Red Cross report never mentioned gas chambers. Internees were categorized as Poles, Jews, Russians, and political prisoners. Jews comprised less than 40% of Auschwitz, around 12% of Dachau, and about 30% of Buchenwald.
Auschwitz death books indicate 29,000 Jews died there, with more Catholics dying than Jews. The number could be adjusted to 40,000. The Auschwitz death toll was initially claimed to be 4,000,000.
The number of dead at Auschwitz was revised in 1989 from 4,100,000 to 1,000,000. Majdanek's death toll was revised in 2005 from 2,000,000 to 78,000, yet the official 6,000,000 Holocaust death toll remained unchanged.
The Jewish World Almanac recorded an increase in the world Jewish population between 1933 and 1948, from 15,315,000 to 15,753,000.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Officials from the International Red Cross visited the camps regularly and had complete access to the camps, documented everything, and estimated the total dead from all the camps to be around 271,000 to 290,000. About half of these dead were Jewish. So we are now talking about some 150 to 200000 Jews that died in the German camps, primarily of disease. In the 1650 page Red Cross report, there was never a mention of any gas chambers. There basically were 4 categories interned during the war, Poles, Jews, Russians, and political prisoners, sometimes alluded to as Germans.
Jews made up less than 40% of Auschwitz, only around 12% of Dachau, and only around 30% of Buchenwald.
Speaker 1: You've got, for example, the death books of Auschwitz, which are the most reliable source. The Soviets confiscated all the information about, nights and death of people living in Auschwitz when they liberated the camp, and those were finally published in the 19 nineties. And those give you a total What is it? 29,000 Jews die in Auschwitz throughout the world. Okay?
And you've got somewhat more Catholics die. You've got more Catholics and Jews dying in Auschwitz. And if you wanna say, oh, there's some missing data there, some Jews not registered who died, and so on, well, you can put it up at very most, I would say, 4 40,000 Jews die dying at Auschwitz. Now I don't allow it to go any higher than that. And that is a 100 times less than the 4,000,000 plaque at Birkenau after the war.
Soviets put that, totally absurd figure.
Speaker 0: Number of dead at Auschwitz was revised in 1989 from 4,100,000 down to 1,000,000. Upon capture by the Soviet Union, original propaganda also claimed that 2,000,000 were murdered in Majdanek, which included 7 homicidal gas chambers. 5 of these 7 have been admitted to never even assert as homicidal gas chambers. Number of dead at Majdanek was revised in 2,005 from 2,000,000 to 78,000, but somehow, the official account of 6,000,000 dead remained unchanged. So what is 6,000,000 minus 4,000,000, minus 2,000,000?
The Holocaust is the only claimed genocide where millions can be reduced from the total claimed to be killed, but the total figure always remains 6000000. Several sources, including the World Almanac, Red Cross documentation, the New York Times and the Chambers Encyclopedia shows that the Jewish population recorded does not reflect the testimonials given on the Holocaust. The Jewish World Almanac has been regarded as the absolute most authentic and trustworthy source for the world's Jewish population numbers. And according to the World Almanac, the world population of Jews increased between 1933 1948 from 15,315,000 to 15,753,000.
@TheOfficial1984 - 1984
The phrase "6 million jews d€ad" was used over 245 times from 1865 to 1945. NOT ONCE WAS IT EVER TRUE. https://t.co/Pv3gnqkmwE
Video Transcript AI Summary
The New York Times, June 6, 1915, references 6,000,000 Jews, predating Hitler's rise to power. An October 18, 1918, article discusses a $1,000,000,000 fund to rebuild Jewry, stating 6,000,000 souls will need help after the war.
On September 8, 1919, The New York Times reported on a mass meeting addressing the killing of 127,000 Jews and 6,000,000 being in peril. A November 12, 1919, article cites 6,000,000 souls facing poverty, starvation, and disease.
The New York Times, February 23, 1920, mentions 6,000,000 Jews. On May 7, 1920, it references 6,000,000 facing famine, disease, and death in Central and Eastern Europe. A July 20, 1921, article states Russia's 6,000,000 Jews faced extermination by massacre. The Gazette, Montreal, December 29, 1931, reports 6,000,000 Jews faced starvation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sunday, June 6, 1915. This is 18 year before Hitler ever sat from the government. Yes, people. 6,000,000 Jews. The New York Times, October 18, 1918, and the article is called $1,000,000,000 fund to rebuild a Jewry.
Now it is 6,000,000 souls will need help to resume normal life when war has ended. The New York Times, September 8, 1919, and the article is called Ukrainian Jews aim to stop problems. Mass meeting he has that a 127,000 Jews are being killed and 6,000,000 on Powell in The New York Times, November 12, 1919, and it reduced to tragically unbelievable poverty, starvation, and disease. About 6,000,000 souls or half the Jewish population of the Earth. February 23, 1920.
6,000,000 Jews. Friday, May 7, 1920. The phone for Jewish Water For Us in Central and Eastern Europe, where 6,000,000 face horrifying conditions of famine, disease, and death. New York Times, Wednesday, July 20, 1921, 12 year before Adolf Hitler ever set for an agreement. Look at that.
Russia's 6,000,000 Jews have faced an extermination by massacre. The Gazette, Montreal, December 29, 1931. And the article pretty much speaks up for itself. 6,000,000 Jews faced starvation.
@TheOfficial1984 - 1984
We have been swindled by censorship and robbed of the truth. They have manipulated our past so they can control our future. NEVER AGAIN. https://t.co/NwAjjdhZZk
@TheOfficial1984 - 1984
David Irving testified for Zündel, stating that"There isn't a shred of evidence that H;tler ordered the mass extermination of the jews" He produced evidence in court that the British psychological warfare executive engineered the gas chamber story as atrocity propaganda. https://t.co/9jOOQhmAiu
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker, once a believer in the Holocaust, now identifies as an "unbeliever." He draws a parallel between his exposure of the Hitler diaries as fake and his current conviction regarding Auschwitz.
He claims Paul Norris found evidence in British archives that the British Psychological Warfare Executive initiated the gas chamber story. The speaker quotes archives alleging the Executive decided to broadcast claims of German gas chambers for Jews.
He further quotes a 1944 handwritten minute from Victor Cavendish Bentinck, then chairman of the Joint Intelligence Committee, stating the "gas chamber lie" had run its course and suggesting distancing from the story to protect the broader psychological warfare effort. The speaker notes that in 1988, this "hare" is still running.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He is the most publicized author on historical topics in the English language in the world. The moment when he came out and said that he now believed that the holocaust was a hoax.
Speaker 1: And now towards the end of my writing life, I find that I'm having to reexamine one of those other towns, Auschwitz. And it's a very, very painful process because halfway through my writing career, I wrote a book about Hitler, a biography of Hitler, in which I was still a believer. And now I've turned into an unbeliever. And here I am holding up the documents proving that the Hitler diaries are fake. And a few seconds after that flashlight photograph was taken, I was Kienaas Complimentier.
I was escorted out of the room about this size in front of the eyes of the world's television cameras right into the arms of, ABC and Good Morning America so that about, two and a half minutes later, I was broadcasting live to the entire United States and completely wrecking Der Sturm's chances of ever selling Hitler diaries over there. It's one of the high points in one's life. And I must admit that at that time, my conviction that that $6,000,000 worth of diaries were fakes was less securely founded than my conviction that I have grown to accept over the last 6 months or so that the other 6,000,000 fake is also unsecurely founded. I am now more sure than ever that there's something stinks about that episode than I was at the time I held up these documents on the Hitler diaries. I was quite prepared a few days later to believe that perhaps the Hitler diaries were genuine, But no one will ever convince me now that what we are told happened in Auschwitz and Trebelinka and Majdanek did actually happen.
Speaker 0: That it was allied propaganda rehashed over and over again and unearthed some documents and quoted them widely that the British psychological warfare decision deliberately in the early forties launched this campaign to deflect away from Soviet war crimes.
Speaker 1: By doing the work in the British archives that the other historians have not done, Paul Norris has turned up the evidence that our own psychological warfare executive were behind the entire gas chamber story. And once again, we're quoting from the archives. They're in the British archives, how the psychological warfare executive decides quite cold bloodedly and cynically to start putting out over the radio waves the allegation that the Germans have built special gas chambers for gassing the Jews and getting rid of them. And later on in the files, around about 1944, we find the chairman of the Joint Intelligence Committee, who is responsible for the Psychological Warfare Executive, writing a handwritten minute. His name is Victor Cavendish Bentinck, an eminent banker and industrialist, still alive in England now, Lord Portland as he is now, chairman of the Joint Intelligence Committee, writing in handwriting in 1944, words to the following effect.
We've had a good run for our money with this gas chamber lie, but really we've got to be a bit careful because eventually, it's going to be exposed, and then our entire psychological warfare effort will be brought down with it. So isn't it a bit isn't it a good time now to distance ourselves from this particular story? We've set the hare running. Now we ought to let it go off by itself. Good run for their money in 1944.
And here we are in 1988, and that hare is still running 44 years later.
@TheOfficial1984 - 1984
On dated August 27, 1943, Victor Cavendish-Bentinck, head of the British Psychological Warfare Executive, admitted that there was not the slightest evidence that 'gas chambers" existed and that such tales of their alleged existence were employed solely for propaganda purposes. https://t.co/ZtkToNBNlp
@TheOfficial1984 - 1984
Atrocity propaganda has plagued our understanding of history for the last 80 years. Everything we think we know is well placed, carefully constructed lie. https://t.co/quvk1QzXUB
@TheOfficial1984 - 1984
Tearing down the foundational structures of your own belief system is not easy. It is far less effort to sit back and blindly accept the world around you and the lies that you have been fed your entire life. But it is worth it. But true freedom comes from knowledge. "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -1984 The censorship of information is a method of control. They erase your past to enslave your mind in the present in order to control your future. Yet no amount of money, lies, or force can stop the truth, and if you are willing and unafraid to speak it, no matter what the consequences, we can take back control from the evil forces that prey upon us. If everyone reposts this thread, we can literally change the world.
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a series of posts questioning the established narrative of the Holocaust. I highlighted various claims, such as the lack of evidence from Red Cross inspections, chemical tests for Zyklon B, and intelligence reports from WWII that did not support the idea of extermination camps. I discussed the experiences of individuals like Paul Rassinier, who challenged the mainstream narrative, and noted discrepancies in death tolls and eyewitness testimonies. I emphasized the importance of scrutinizing both physical evidence and historical accounts while questioning the motives behind the prevailing narrative.
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
The Holocaust, Fact and fiction! 1. The Red Cross inspected Auschwitz in 1944 and found no evidence it was an extermination camp. ⛺️ 🧵 1/16 https://t.co/eJd8F8r0CH
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
In 1988, American execution expert Fred Leuchter examined the “gas chambers” at Auschwitz, and had the walls chemically tested for Zyklon B residue. The test were negative. 🧵 2/16 https://t.co/7OpO5jU1We
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
Alan Turing and British intelligence had cracked the German Enigma Code 1942. Meaning they could intercept and read German messages at Auschwitz when spying. 🕵️ They recorded no evidence of Auschwitz being a death camp. 🧵 3/16 https://t.co/3CDj4xZ7sf
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
The CIA was spying on German camps in the 1940’s and did take aerial photographs. There is no evidence from these photographs or their reports that these camps were “death camps” The labels on these photos were added decades later. 🧵 4/16 https://t.co/ctZLUSGXFs
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
Paul Rassinier, was French socialist who was also put in “death camp” at Buchenwald. He wrote a few books on his experiences but he was considered a Holocaust denier even though he was a camp survivor… why? His version of the facts didn’t fit the narrative. He claimed the death camp allegations were incredibly exaggerated, and that while being a camp was a horrendous experience, it was not what is being sold today. 🧵 5/16
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
There is no document or official order found anywhere in Nazi or SS communications about a “final solution” to eliminate the Jews. Decades ago historian David Irving challenged anyone to find such a document with the reward of 1k pounds. No one has ever succeeded. 🧵 6/16 https://t.co/17HFyUoMX6
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
There was a simming pool at Auschwitz, a maternity ward, a hospital 🏥, and lots of forensic reports of the use of Zyklon B in the prisoner rooms. No not for extermination but for the purpose of keeping the prisoners alive. This was used as a means to eliminate lice and keep the spread of Typhus under control. Among those SS communications, there are internal reports about keeping the death of the inmates down, and discussion on how to fix the problems. 🧵 7/16
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
The only “death camps” ever discovered were on the Soviet captured side of Germany post WW2. Meaning you have to trust the Soviet communist version of history in order to believe the official narrative. 🧵 8/16 https://t.co/o1Ab3VqrGy
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
One of the initial “death tolls” from the Soviet camp of Majdanek has been reduced from 2 million to 78k…. That’s quite the revision! And many question the accuracy of that 78k figure based on historical records. 🧵 9/16 https://t.co/fKXxFKvprg
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
At the height of the Covid Epidemic 😷, some New York crematoriums were working overtime and able to cremate up to 15 bodies a day! Obviously you don’t have to be a math whiz to figure out that 80 years ago, the Germans would not have been able to do this faster, and it would have taken roughly 69 years to gas and cremate all the alleged victims if they were to actually do it. 🧵 10/16
Video Transcript AI Summary
The facilities at Auschwitz, Birkenau, and Loveland could not have supported executions using hydrogen cyanide, carbon monoxide, or any other lethal gas. Even with generous maximum usage rates for all alleged gas chambers, totaling 1693 persons per week, it would have taken 68 years to execute 6,000,000 people. Therefore, claiming these facilities were capable of mass executions is ludicrous and insulting.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: None of the facilities examined at Auschwitz, Birkenau, or Loveland could have supported or in fact did ever support multiple executions utilizing hydrogen cyanide, carbon monoxide, or any other allegedly or factually lethal gas. Based upon very generous maximum usage rates for all the alleged gas chambers totaling some 1693 persons per week. And assuming these facilities could support gas executions, it would have required 68 years to execute the alleged number of 6,000,000 persons. Promoting these facilities as being capable of affecting mass, multiple, or even singular executions is both ludicrous and insulting to every individual on this planet.
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
Didn’t the allies find tons dead bodies on the camps they liberated? Yes. No one is saying people didn’t die. The reality is Germany was fighting a 2 front war, running out of fuel, ⛽️, food and resources, and Typhus was spreading through many of these camps. However there is no physical evidence these were extermination camps used for the purpose of killing Jews. Why would the Germans wait until the middle of a 2 front war to do this? Hitler came to power in 1933. Hitler also signed the Haavara agreement with the Zionist leadership in 1933. This plan was a coordinated effort to relocate the Jews from Germany to Palestine and satisfy both parties. If Hitler wanted to kill all the Jews, why did the Zionist work with him? And why did he sign this agreement? 🧵 11/16
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
Aren’t all the people that have questioned the official narrative of the holocaust wackos and Nazis? No not at all. Germar Rudolf- is a chemist who graduated from the prestigious max plank institute Fred Leuchter- is an American execution expert with multiple patents to his name. David Irving- is British historian who was lauded by the masses when his first books were released, and his ability to go through many first hand documents, only to later be destroyed by the mainstream press when he came across these uncomfortable facts. Arthur Butz- is an MIT graduate and has been a college professor at northwestern for decades. His definitive book “the hoax of the 20th century” still holds up even though it was published in the 70’s. Many of these men have served prison time for these statements. They have not changed their beliefs or reports. 🧵 12/16
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
But I’ve seen lots of movies and read books about eyewitness testimony!? Some people have a hard time believing this, but Hollywood is not history. It is story telling. 🎥 Even further most of these stories are based on “historical fiction” meaning the story can be completely made up as long as a few facts are found. 🧵 13/16
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
There have been countless stories of “Holocaust survivors” later exposed as frauds. While this technically doesn’t disprove the official narrative, it’s does provide a lens of the possibilities. Because virtually all the Holocaust stories are based on eyewitness testimony, and not physical evidence, it provides an easy window for anyone to make up these claims. In fact many eyewitness testimonies do not correspond to the physical evidence at all. Some witnesses describe bodies being black and blue after being hit with Zyklon B, however a person gassed with Zyklon B soul have a red/pink body in the aftermath. 🧵 14/16
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
If the office story really was a fraud, the people in control of the media would have to maintain the story for decades, and they would have to make it illegal to question in most of the western world….🌎 Which they have. Ultimately you have to determine if the physical evidence is real, or if the eye witness testimony is real. Are they jailing people because they are wrong, or because they are right? Is it possible that Jews would lie about this in mass? It says specifically in their holly book 📕 the Talmud, they can lie to gentiles. Is it also strange that Protestant leader Martin Luther wrote a book called “on the Jews and their lies” in 1543. He tried desperately to convert them to Christianity but ultimately discovered it was hopeless and wrote about their behavior. You know the media is lying to you. You know the history books are lies. Have you figured out who is doing the lying? 🤥 🧵 15/16
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
If you appreciated this thread, consider donating to this page via buymeacoffee.com/Uncommonsince76 🧵 16/16 I appreciate your support!
reSee.it AI Summary
I explore the notion that if the Holocaust were merely a propaganda campaign, it would require strict laws against questioning it and involve intimidation tactics against skeptics. I mention instances of wrongful convictions and the absence of eyewitness accounts to gas chambers. I discuss the portrayal of the Holocaust in education, media, and reparations, suggesting that it serves to instill guilt in Europeans. I also highlight how narratives around the Holocaust could influence immigration policies and international conflicts, questioning the motivations behind these perspectives.
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
If the “Holocaust” was really a propaganda campaign instead of a historical reality, it would need to be illegal to question in western countries… 🧵 1/22 https://t.co/GI1cdc5D7O
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
Jewish groups would need to terrorize people that questioned it, like Ernst Zundel. 🧵 2/22 https://t.co/IJH4kGiqey
Video Transcript AI Summary
An explosion occurred early this morning at the home of Toronto publisher Ernst Zundel, believed to be caused by a pipe bomb. The blast, which happened around 4:30 AM behind a garage on Carlton Street, caused approximately $2,000 in damage to Zundel's property and nearby vehicles. The police are investigating, with several suspects in mind. Witnesses described the explosion as powerful, resulting in smoke and flames. Zundel, known for his controversial views on the Holocaust and a collector of Nazi memorabilia, has faced threats and has extensive security measures at his home. A caller claiming to represent the People's Liberation Movement for the Jewish Defense League stated their involvement in the bombing, though the group is unfamiliar to authorities. Zundel is currently facing a jury trial for publishing false news.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Early this morning, there was an explosion at the home of Toronto publisher, Ernst Zundel. Metro police believe a pipe bomb is behind the blast.
Speaker 1: It happened just before 4:30 this morning. A device which police believed to be a pipe bomb exploded behind a garage at 206 Carlton Street. That address is the residence of publisher Ernst Zundel. Damage to the building and the car inside was minimal, totaling about $2,000 Homes and vehicles nearby were also damaged slightly by flying metal and wood. This morning's bombing is being investigated by 51 division and the bomb squad.
Police say they have a number of possible suspects.
Speaker 2: Basically, it sounded like a powerful blast going off or or a a truck or a bus or a fire engine backfiring. And then when you got here, there was nothing but smoke and flames and stuff like that.
Speaker 3: The bomb caused about $2,000 damage to Zundel's garage, his car, as well as 3 other cars marked 15 feet away. My girl's killed me.
Speaker 2: I was not you know, I don't drive it easily.
Speaker 3: Zundul, a collector of Nazi memorabilia, has published material suggesting the holocaust was a hoax. He is a man with many enemies.
Speaker 2: With also many friends.
Speaker 3: We here at City Pulse received a phone call late last night from someone claiming to be a part of a group called the People's Liberation Movement for the Jewish Defense League. The caller told us his group planted the bomb.
Speaker 2: I have never heard of any such organization. We did not have anything to do with the bombing of Ernesto's home. However, I could certainly understand what would motivate some people to carry out such an action. I have Maya Halevi. I would have expected an answer like that.
I wish for the day when Prince Zundal's operation will be totally dismantled. I think that'll come long after his operation has been dismantled, I'm sure.
Speaker 3: Zundal has obviously been expecting trouble of some sort. His home features numerous security devices, like outdoor video cameras with monitors inside the house, round the clock security guards, iron bars, search lights, and barbed wire. If it's
Speaker 2: a warning, it, has made no impression on me whatsoever.
Speaker 3: Zindel's jury trial in a charge of publishing false news causing mischief to the public interest in social and racial
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
They would send provocative letters mocking the suicide of your daughter just before your libel Trial, like they did David Irving…. 🧵 3/22 https://t.co/C6lOjpyFBL
Video Transcript AI Summary
Irving received an expensive wreath after a funeral, with a card that read, "truly a merciful death," signed by Philipp Buhler, who had been dead since 1945. Buhler was a key figure in the Nazi euthanasia program, and the message was a disturbing smear aimed at Irving before his trial. Concerned for his safety, he photographed the card before disposing of the wreath. The undertakers were shocked, and the florist later sent a beautiful arrangement, expressing embarrassment over the incident. The man who ordered the wreath had a Middle Eastern appearance. The trial lasted three months, but Irving remained haunted by the incident and how his enemies exploited it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Irving, you need to have no worries. We handle the arrangements for Admiral Lord Nelson, you know. And they phoned that afternoon after the reception after the funeral, after I'd kissed the coffin goodbye. And I said, Mr. Irving, something rather odd has happened.
A reese has been delivered here and it's too late for the service. What shall we do? And I said, well, tell me, is there a card attached? They said, yes, there's a card attached and it's a very expensive reese. It must have cost many 100 of pounds.
It's white lilies and white roses. I said, well, please send it around straight away because I will have to thank people people who sent the wreath. And the wreath was delivered by a courier an hour later to my front door. It never came upstairs. I read it and the card downstairs in the street.
And I went upstairs and got a camera and took a photograph of the card. The card read, in German I'm I'm sorry. I took a photograph of it. The card read, truly a merciful death, and the signature was Philipp Buhler and friends. That would mean nothing at all to anybody who didn't know the history of the of the Nazis in the Third Reich.
Merciful death, Gernard, was the German, the Nazi euphemism for killing the for euthanasia, killing the disabled. Philipp Buller, who had apparently signed this card, had been dead since 1945. He was Hitler's left hand man. He was head of the euthanasia program. He killed himself in 1945 at the end of the war.
This was a nasty little smear been sent by somebody with more than enough money to spare aimed at destabilizing me 2 or 3 weeks before the trial began. It was the nastiest thing that has ever happened to me. I'm not going to say that the devil lives that herself was personally involved in this. I was efficiently worried by this that I took a photograph of the card because I thought it may be just a smear of reese today. I hate reese today.
Tomorrow, it may be a pipe bomb. So I took a photograph of the card before I destroyed the reese. I phoned the undertakers. They were very shocked. They said, we can't understand how this happened, sir.
It came from the Bloomsbury florists. I visited the Bloomsbury florists that afternoon and as I came away from them, they were deeply they were very embarrassed of course and very shocked and they sent around a wonderful wreath of flowers afterwards and, they said the man who bought this wreath, the white wreath, the roses and the lilies, he looked like a he had a Middle Eastern appearance. He looked very well, see, he was very well dressed. As I walked away from the shop, I found myself passing the front door of Deborah Lipstadt's lawyers 100 yards away. It was a very unpleasant experience.
The trial lasted 3 months, but I never ever forgot what had happened to Josephine and the use to which my enemies had put it. I'm not going to go into the details of the trial here because it's too complicated to read.
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
They would need to give professionals large Jail sentences to quell more people from speaking out. Historian David Irving- 3 years Publisher Ernst Zundel- 5 years Chemist Germar Rudolf- 2.5 years Professor Faurrison- Fined 10k euros in 1990. 🧵 4/22 https://t.co/AdCLGi6FLg
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
There would be cases of people wrongfully convicted of being Nazi Killers, since it’s all based on eyewitness testimony. Cases like John Demjanjuk, who was exonerated. 🧵 5/22 https://t.co/CnAaKdGlrD
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
A case like Frank Wallace, where he was accused by 11 people of being a Nazi murderer, but ultimately they were all lies… 🧐 Why did all those Jews lie in unison? 🧵 6/22 https://t.co/uOjfk0tT44
Video Transcript AI Summary
Frank Wallace from Chicago recounted how, in 1977, Nazi hunter Simon Wiesenthal accused him of numerous wartime killings. Eleven witnesses claimed he was an SS officer in Poland. Over four years, Wallace faced street attacks, lost friends, suffered two heart attacks, and borrowed $120,000 for his defense. Ernst Zundel contributed several thousand dollars to his cause. In tears, Wallace shared that he was exonerated in 1980 after proving he had worked on a farm during the war, leading to all charges being dropped. The defense aimed to highlight how Holocaust-related accusations can incite mass hysteria.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Another witness was Frank Wallace of Chicago. Wallace told how in 1977, Nazi hunter Simon Wiesenthal accused him of dozens of wartime killings. 11 witnesses testified at his trial that he had been an SS officer in Poland. Over the next 4 years, Wallace said he was attacked on the street and abandoned by friends. He suffered 2 heart attacks and borrowed a $120,000 for his defense.
Ernst Zundel gave him several $1,000. In tears, Wallace testified that he was cleared in 1980 when he proved he had worked on a farm during the war. All charges were finally dropped. The defense wanted to illustrate how accusations related to the holocaust can provoke what it calls mass hysteria among the present.
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
There would be no eyewitnesses to the gas chambers… which there aren’t. “There are no eye-witnesses to the gas chambers. I went to Poland totally expecting there to be execution chambers when I got there, I was disheartened with what I discovered and what I had been taught over 40 years.” -Fred Leuchter 🧵 7/22
Video Transcript AI Summary
I went to Poland to inspect the gas chambers, expecting to find evidence of gas executions. To my surprise, I found nothing at Auschwitz, Birkenau, and Majdanek. I had believed in their existence for over 40 years, but now I can't accept what isn't there. Despite numerous eyewitness accounts, I was disheartened to discover that the facilities I expected to see do not exist. There are no films or documentation supporting the claims of gas execution chambers. It's hard to reconcile this with what I've been taught.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: See here and prove that it took place. Mister Lucas wanna just read what actually took place when there were eyewitnesses, thousands of eyewitnesses. Why do we have to sit here and argue on something that's But we've got to keep our eye on the gas chambers. I went to Poland to inspect these facilities totally believing that I was gonna find gas execution chambers. I was totally amazed when I got there.
And I was disheartened that I've been taught in school and I believed for over 40 years. Believe it. You still can believe it. You still can believe it. I can't believe what's not there.
What what do you mean it's not there? There are no gas execution chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau, and Majdanek. You can go to the library of films to, the There isn't even a film available. You know, that's the reason why you have to have is, you know
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
You would never hear about the Red Cross documents that states there were no mass exterminations at Auschwitz, and that that the total deaths in all camps are 271k… 🧵 8/22 https://t.co/uX2jtIhuHz
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
The history book publishers would have to be owned and controlled by Jews like McGraw Hill with its partnership with Mossad agent and Ghislaine Maxwells father Robert Maxwell. 🧵 9/22 https://t.co/uZJ1UxtYP8
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
You would make sure every European and American child would read the Diary of Anne Frank at a young age to ingrain the propaganda, and exclude the fact that parts of it were written after her death. “I have here this forensic report which analyzed all 3 of the Anne Frank Diaries and found many of the entries were written in ball point pen ink. 🖊️ This ink only became available in 1951. So either Anne Frank was alive in 1951 or parts of this diary were written by someone else.” -Ernst Zundel 🧵 10/22
Video Transcript AI Summary
I defend my ethnic group and country against the propaganda from World War II, which I see as an extortion racket against the German people, benefiting Zionists financially. This ties into the discussion about the Anne Frank diary. A German forensic examination in 1980 revealed that parts of the diary were written in ballpoint pen ink, which was only available after 1951, suggesting either Anne Frank was alive then or she didn’t write the diary.
Regarding the claim of six million Jewish deaths, it's easy to disprove since there weren't that many Jews in Nazi-occupied areas. The West German government pays reparations, but it was established by the Allied forces and lacks legitimacy, as it was handpicked and suppressed opposition parties.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Don't push it. I defend my ethnic group and my native country against the most massive propaganda lie that still lingers on from the 2nd World War. It is an extortion racket perpetrated against the German people, which has netted the Zionists already over a 100,000,000,000 German marks. It is very profitable and the racket is cloaked in humanity and human things. I do want to tie it into your lead into the story with the Anne Frank diary.
I've got the book here.
Speaker 1: Yep.
Speaker 0: Anne Frank diary of hopes. I have your document by the German forensic section of the Bundeskriminaland which has tested in 1980. Many sheets of the 3 diaries and I came up with saying that they were written many parts in ballpoint pen ink which only came on the market in 1951, so the writer of the diary was alive in 1951 so either Anne wasn't the writer or she was alive and the dead. Alright.
Speaker 1: Let's get back to this
Speaker 0: Germany government document.
Speaker 1: Let's get back to this myth
Speaker 0: that you say.
Speaker 1: That 6,000,000 people Muslim Jews did not die.
Speaker 0: Good. Very easy to prove. There were no 6,000,000 Jews in the areas occupied by Nazi Germany. The death
Speaker 1: German government, the West German government pay all these billions of of, Deutschmarks in reparation
Speaker 0: if it did not feel that there was some validity? Number 1, the West German government is a crystalline government. It was installed by the allied occupying authorities. It was handpicked, and, all opposition parties that could have represent
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
You would exclude from the history books, 📕 that Jews in the US wrote books on the logical basis to exterminate all the Germans. Meanwhile there isn’t one document from Nazi germany discussing the planned extermination of all the Jews. 🧵 11/22 https://t.co/m4MjfHmZsU
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
If the Holocaust was really a perpetuated myth, it would need Jewish ✡️ producers and filmmakers to make movies 🎥 about it year in and year out, but those movies would be “historical fiction” and the viewers would not really know. 🧵 12/22 https://t.co/tWVgCOcP27
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
If it was really a propaganda exploiting tool, even Jews would write about it, like ✡️ Norman Finklestein. 🧵 13/22 https://t.co/IhzZGSaoMM
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
If it was really a financial and psychological weapon, countries that lost the war would pay insane amounts in reparations, but it would never be considered enough… 🧵 14/22 https://t.co/NATAiii0zP
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
If it really was a racket, the amount of “Holocaust survivors” would vary wildly, and even increase over the years…. 🧐 🧵 15/22 https://t.co/lkWCt2xnH8
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
If they needed to conceal documents that had contrary evidence, they would need a ✡️ Jewish person to be the official historian of Winston Churchill. Someone like Martin Gilbert…. 🧵 16/22 https://t.co/DtG7A8JtS0
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
But further, neither Eisenhower nor Churchill would include anything about a Holocaust in their WW2 biographies…. Which they didn’t. 🧵 17/22 https://t.co/cOpYwN0MJW
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
Even further, the Holocaust would be used as a way to flood the countries with Immigrants, and say to European people, you can never have your own states again…. “One of the main reasons for perpetuating the Holocaust Myth is to poison European people with a guilt complex. They are never allowed to have national or ethnic pride again, and this is used as the excuse to flood their nation with immigrants.” -Jurgen Graf 🧵 18/22
Video Transcript AI Summary
The exploration of the Holocaust myth reveals its use as political propaganda, linking it to Western immigration policies. Debates often reference the Holocaust to justify welcoming refugees, fostering a collective guilt among Europeans. This guilt undermines national pride and promotes a multicultural society, which is seen as a safeguard against racism. However, the reality shows that massive immigration leads to cultural tensions and ghettos, rather than integration. The idea of a racially mixed future, as envisioned by thinkers like Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi, is questioned. The technical impossibility of mass gas chambers challenges the Holocaust narrative, suggesting that revisionist research provides a clearer understanding of these historical events.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Folks on a worldwide scale. The deeper I plunged into the origins of the myth, the more I studied its daily use for political propaganda purposes, the more I became convinced of 2 things. The government of the western nations were about puppets dancing on the strip on strings of shadowy hidden forces, and there was a direct connection between the suicidal immigration policy of Western Europe and the gas chamber myth. As I told you, I repeatedly participated in discussions upon the immigration problem after the publication of of my first book. In every one of these debates, my opponents invariably talked about the Holocaust.
Now I quote some of the arguments. While 1,000,000 of Jews were being gassed in Nazi Germany, the Swiss government stood eye to eye it by closing our frontiers to the victims of Hitler's racialist theory. Therefore, we have become guilty, and we must never commit the same sin again by sending political refugees from bloodthirsty dictatorships to their certain days. Far from pursuing a more restrictive asylum policy, we should atone for the crimes of the past by welcoming the victims of terror and persecution. I gradually began to understand that one of the main functions of the holocaust lie was to poison the European peoples, not only the Germans and the Austrians, but the rest of them as well with a guilt complex.
If the Germans and the Austrians were the main culprits, the other ones were guilty as well because nobody had a stern finger to save the Jews from troubling and Auschwitz. Making accessories to a crime without parallel in history, we were no longer entitled to any form of national pride, let alone of national consciousness. The only guarantee against the new Nazism and the new holocaust was the obliteration of all racial and national barriers, the creation of a peaceful and tolerant multicultural society where there could be no more racism because there were no more races. Yeah. Of course, all this is poor rubbish.
While massive immigration of foreign races naturally leads to a certain number of interracial marriages, the bulk of the indigenous people will always stick to their own national and cultural rules, and many immigrants, especially those embracing the Muslim faith, simply refuse to assimilate. Thus, the result of integration is not the obliteration of all national and cultural differences, but the mushrooming of ghettos and the increase of racial tensions, which could sooner or later leads to strife and bloodshed. Regardless of whether a global racing melting pot racial melting pot would be possible or not, would be desirable or not, it's simply not possible. But as a vision, it has existed for decades. Let me quote now what, count Calvin Mowgikal Elkie, founder of the Pan European Union, which was a kind of spiritual ancestor of the European community, wrote in his book, Practical Idealism, in 1925.
I quote, the man of the future will be of mixed race. Today's races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian, niggerite race of the future, similar in its appearance to the ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples by the diversity of individuals. So who were the shadowy organizations which could use our national governments to adopt a policy reflecting Gordon Huttig Kallergi's ideals? The question is a formulatively difficult one, but far more difficult than the holocaust story.
In light of revisionist research, the holocaust legend is now easy to depart. As the purported mass gasings were technically impossible, they didn't take place. Whereas, we can work with sound technical and chemical evidence
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
We would see Jews ✡️ like Alejandro Mayorkas justify opening our borders because he “is the child of a Holocaust survivor.” 🧵 19/22 https://t.co/2c4kGKSiYH
Video Transcript AI Summary
The implication that the language used reflects the sentiments of the 260,000 members of the Department of Homeland Security is despicable. Senator Hawley's adversarial approach is misplaced, as he may not be aware of my background. I am the child of a Holocaust survivor; my mother lost nearly all her family to the Nazis. His tone is disrespectful to me and my heritage.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What I found despicable is the implication, that, this language, tremendously odious, actually could be emblematic of the sentiments of the 260,000 men and women of the Department of Homeland Security, number 1. Number 2, senator Hawley takes a adversarial approach to me in this question, and perhaps he doesn't know my own background. Perhaps he does not know that I am the child of a holocaust survivor. Perhaps he does not know that my mother lost almost all her family at the hands of the Nazis. And so I find his adversarial tone to be entirely misplaced.
I find it to be disrespectful of me and my heritage, and I do not
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
We would see our ✡️ Jewish Secretary of the treasury use the emotional aspect of the Holocaust to support a ✡️ Jewish War in Ukraine. 🧵 20/22 https://t.co/sBkHJJNtMf
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
If the Holocaust was a propaganda weapon, there would be many fake stories later exposed as frauds…. 🧵 21/ 22 https://t.co/10VzKf5Vcd
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
If the Holocaust was propaganda, they would just need to do exactly what they are doing… If you appreciated this thread, consider donating to this page via buymeacoffee.com/Uncommonsince76 🧵 22/22 I appreciate your support!
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
An American Industrial Chemist testified that it was impossible to have Mass Gassed people with Zyklon B, in the way it was described. https://t.co/QYMNnSv00r
Video Transcript AI Summary
Doctor William Lindsey, an American industrial chemist, testified about Zyklon B, the gas allegedly used to kill Jews at Auschwitz and other camps. He emphasized the dangers of Zyklon B and the need for careful handling. When questioned about a previous witness who claimed to have handled corpses shortly after gassings, he deemed it highly unlikely. Regarding mass gassings, he stated it was impossible for them to have occurred as described, asserting that no one was intentionally killed with Zyklon B in that manner. Additionally, he challenged earlier claims about flames shooting from crematoria chimneys, explaining that such conditions would damage the brick and mortar structure.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Later, another defense witness, Doctor. William Lindsey, an American industrial chemist, took the stand. He described the properties of Ziklon B, hydrogen cyanide, the gas said to have been used to kill Jews at Auschwitz and at other camps. Doctor. Lindsay said what a dangerous gas cyclone b was and how carefully it had to be handled.
Defense counsel Douglas Christie then mentioned an earlier witness who had claimed to have handled corpses shortly after the victims had been gassed. Doctor. Lindsay said this was highly unlikely. Asked by mister Christie about mass gassings, doctor Lindsay said it was impossible for it to have happened the way it's described. No one was willfully killed with Ziklon B in this manner.
Doctor Lindsey also suggested that earlier testimony concerning flames, day and night shooting out of crematoria chimneys was wrong. He said this would cause a brick and mortar chimney to fall apart.
@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC
It didn’t happen. Sorry. Turns out, it’s a case of Jews being the most vile liars and thieves in world history. In fact, considering the number of synagogues and Holocaust museums that contribute to pedophilia and kid trafficking in this country alone, it’s past time to starting burning them down.
@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup
CLIFFS: There’s no evidence of a ‘Holocaust’ until the 50s, when they got together and just made it TF up. All to provide their brand new ‘state’ a steady annual income stream off the backs of the one race they hate most. Ours.
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
Main points against the official Holocaust narrative. -the Red Cross kept detailed records of all the deaths in the concentration camps. (271k) -the allies broke the codes to the SS communications, and never heard anything about a Holocaust -there is no order from Hitler for a “final solution.” -Goebbels wrote in his diary that the end goal was to deport the Jews to Madagascar -American executive expert Fred Leucther scraped the bricks of the Auschwitz gas chamber and found no Zyklon B residue. -Paul Rassinier, a French communist, was in a concentration camp alongside Jews, and wrote about his experience being completely different. -it was physically impossible to gas and cremate 6 million Jews in the time it was reported. -when a German questions the Holocaust, he goes to prison, when a Jew says he’s a victim of the Holocaust, he gets a reparations check.
@WyronGaines - Myron Gaines Updates
♦️Myron DEBUNKS the H*Iocaust in 10mins!😳🫣 “The gas chambers? Questionable.. The cremations? Nearly impossible.. The witnesses? Not really credible.. Death camps? No, labour camps.. The j*ws declared war on HitIer first!” https://t.co/c69vmhfM7t
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions the conventional narrative of the Holocaust, suggesting that key aspects may be misrepresented. They claim that the gas chambers at Auschwitz lacked gas traces and had doors that opened from the inside. They allege Zyklon B was primarily used to combat typhus, a disease spread by lice, and that the victims' lack of hair in photos supports this.
The speaker cites an expert who designed gas chambers in the US, claiming it would have been impossible to gas millions of Jews with the resources available. They also question the feasibility of cremating so many bodies in the given timeframe with the available technology.
The speaker references a case in Canada where Holocaust survivors allegedly admitted to sensationalizing their stories. They claim Anne Frank's memoirs were partially written with ballpoint pens and that the number of deaths on Holocaust memorials has been reduced. They state that death camps were actually labor camps and that not all victims were Jewish.
The speaker claims Hitler was partly responsible for the creation of Israel through the Havar agreement, which allowed 60,000 Jews to emigrate there in the 1930s. They allege that Jews served in the Nazi military and that there's no documentation proving the extermination of Jews. They conclude that questioning the Holocaust is forbidden because it is the foundation of a narrative that gives power to certain groups.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What? I thought they were trying
Speaker 1: to exterminate them. Gas chambers, death camps, extermination, final solution. What are you talking about? Hillary hated the Jews.
Speaker 0: Yeah. About that. If they would lie to justify the genocide and ethnic cleansing in modern day society, if they would lie about nine eleven, if they would lie about the USS Liberty, but they if they would lie about JFK, if they would lie about RFK, what makes you think that they wouldn't lie about the Holocaust? There's a reason why questioning this event can get you arrested in what? 19 different countries?
I'll tell you why. The Holocaust is the base. If you debunk the Holocaust, the whole fucking house of cards comes crashing down. Did the Holocaust happen? Yes.
Did 6,000,000 die? Well, let's look at some of the evidence. First, they said that millions of the Jews were gassed. Interesting. A guy named Fred Lucher went ahead and went to Auschwitz and looked at the gas chambers, wooden doors that opened from the inside, no gas traces in the fucking gas chamber area.
Then he finds out that the Zyklon bead that they used was really to kill lice and vermin. Well, you're probably wondering, Meyer, why the fuck do they care about killing lice? Well, at the time, there was a disease running around called typhus. Very common during that era. Kills you when you don't have that much food, and it's very contagious.
Gets passed through the hair. So then it starts to make sense. Wait. Hold on. When I look at the pictures, no one has hair.
I thought they were, like, being abused or something. Oh, no. Wow. They're trying to spread this they're trying to stop the spread of typhus. Wait.
Hold on. I thought they were trying to kill them. This is kinda weird. Then you find out to gas just one person requires an enormous amount of resources. How do I know this?
Because Fred Lucher or Frank Lucher. I forget his first name. I think it's Fred or Frank. Whatever. The fact that matters is this, to gas someone and kill them, just one person, requires an enormous amount of resources and gas.
How does he know this? Because he designed the gas chambers to execute people in United States. Expert when it comes to killing people with gas. In his expert opinion, impossible to have enough gas to kill millions of Jews. Then when you look at the structure where the gassing was supposed to happen, not really conducive to gassing people, especially at a mass level.
And the amount of gas required, damn near impossible to get. And it was wildly expensive back then. Then on top of that, if they did gas them the way that they claim, the Nazis would have died too. Really expensive and cumbersome way to kill millions of Jews. Okay.
Alright, Myron. You might be onto something. Okay. Well, let's talk about the cremations. With the cremations, takes what?
Hours? Multiple hours to cremate just one body? Well, 6,000,000? Cremate all that. Damn.
They had what? A certain amount of ovens. Would they've been able to do that in that period of time? Three to five years? Cremate 6,000,000 people?
Damn, man. The math ain't mathing. Like, you're talking about World War two sophistication. We have high end technology that takes hours to cremate a body. You're telling me that they had worse technology back then, but somehow they were able to cremate all those bodies with fewer technology and less time?
Math ain't math, and is it? Okay. Alright. But what about all the Holocaust survivors? Myron, come on.
There were witnesses. The fuck are you talking about, man? Totally happened like they told us in the history books. Well, gets weird there too, guys. Some guy, Sundell, out in Canada, German guy, questions of the Holocaust.
Well, that was a big mistake. Welcome, baunch. Canada doesn't have free speech. He gets arrested. Nigga goes to jail.
Big mistake, though. Since he was facing a criminal case, that means that he had to put together a defense team. And boy, did he put together a defense team. He brought in experts from multiple realms, cremation experts, Fred Lucher, good lawyers. Now the prosecution brought in a couple of these Holocaust survivors.
Upon cross examination, these Holocaust survivors admitted that they sensationalize the stories for dramatic effect. Oh, and by the way, these people had memoirs and books that they sold. So the gas chambers, questionable. The cremations, nearly impossible in that time span. The witnesses, not really credible.
What about Anne Frank? What about her, Myron? Her memoirs. Oh, yeah. About that.
You find out ballpoint pens, uncle relative, writing the memoirs for her. Oh, man. It's getting sticky. But even on the Holocaust memorial, it says 6,000,000. Well, it's kinda changed quite a bit.
It's down to, like, 1.5 now. What? Yeah. They kinda edited the numbers without telling anybody. What?
Yeah. She was telling me the witnesses lied. The gas chambers were almost impossible to conduct to kill that many people with that much gas at that time. Well, hold on. There were death camps, though.
I don't know if they told you the truth about that one either. What are you talking about? Well, you know, when you're in a war, slave labor kinda helps. Wars are kinda expensive and tough. You need to manufacture shit.
So a lot of the times when you get prisoners of war, you just, like, make them work. What? What are you talking about, Myron? Yeah. You just kinda, make them work.
You know? It's like a labor camp. No way. I thought it was a death camp. Nah, man.
They kinda just had them working there. What? 6,000,000 Jews. That's the other part I forgot to tell you about. They weren't all Jews.
Some of them were, like, regular Polish people, Russians, you know, allied forces. Some of them were Jews, sure, but they weren't all Jews. Bro, there were death camps. Did they tell you the part that there were, like, hundreds of babies born during this time? What?
I thought they were trying
Speaker 1: to exterminate them. Gas chambers, death camps, extermination, final solution. What are you talking about? Hitler hated the Jews.
Speaker 0: Yeah. About that. Hilo was kinda responsible for, like, the creation of Israel. What? What are you talking about?
Yeah. Cool. Well, this thing is called like the Havar agreement. Like, 60,000 Jews went to Israel in the thirties. What?
Yeah. He actually let them leave all their resources. They they they went there. They started creating Israel. Woah.
They didn't take with us in the fucking history books. Yeah. I know. Why not? The reason why they don't tell you this is because it kinda takes away the victim narrative from the Jews.
Gets even better. What? Hillary had Jews in the military, Nazi party. Yeah. Tens of thousands.
And some of them actually had really high ranks like brigadier and shit. Yeah. I know. Another fun fact. They never found any real documentation saying we need to kill the Jews.
Matter of fact, fun fact, there was actually documentation saying the Jews
Speaker 1: are dying too quick. We gotta keep them alive.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Oh, I forgot this too. The Jews declared war on Hitler first. They don't talk about that part either, do they? Look.
I just threw a lot of red pills at you guys. That whole thing will probably get me put in jail in Germany, actually. Matter of fact actually, matter yeah. I I definitely yeah. That's what I just said is definitely legal in Germany.
This is the shit that's forbidden. And this is how you have to go deep sometimes when it comes to debating the Zionist. The guy that they hate so much, Adolf Hitler, that they always rally against to say he's the most evil person that hated Jews, he's actually partly responsible or wholly responsible for the creation and rise of Israel. And this is the forbidden history that they don't want you to know. Because if you actually knew the truth and you knew that the Holocaust really turned out to be a labor camp with a bunch of ridiculous tall tales about people being systematically exterminated for nothing more than their Jewish.
Well, if you get rid of that, then they can't kill innocent kids in Palestine. They can't say never again. They can't always have this victim mindset. They can't always say, oh my god. We're so persecuted.
The Holocaust. Like I said before, the reason why the Holocaust is illegal to question is because that, my friends, is the foundation from which the house of cards is built. If you get rid of the foundation, the house of cards falls. If the house of cards falls, they have no power. The narrative is destroyed.
reSee.it AI Summary
Since Auschwitz is trending, I want to share perspectives often overlooked in mainstream discussions about the Holocaust. I highlight claims from Holocaust Revisionists, including David Cole's observations on gas chamber inconsistencies and the lack of documented orders for mass extermination. I also discuss the conditions in camps, the inaccuracies in survivor stories, and the propaganda surrounding the Holocaust narrative. Ultimately, I believe in the necessity of open dialogue about historical events, emphasizing that the truth can withstand scrutiny.
@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne
🧵Since Auschwitz is trending let's talk about something you won't hear about on the official Auschwitz tour: The perspective of the Holocaust Revisionists (aka Holocaust "Deniers") These are all facts they didn't teach you in grade school about the Holocaust...
@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne
First, here’s a jewish man named David Cole on the inconsistencies of the gas chambers (ie. wooden doors and other illogical constructions) David is surprised “how little evidence there is" for many of the events https://t.co/oyRbuPVxPs
Video Transcript AI Summary
Claims are made that proofs of the Holocaust are few, consisting mainly of eyewitness testimonies and postwar confessions, but no wartime documents detailing homicidal gas chambers. Evidence like piles of human hair, shoes, and clothing are explained as normal byproducts of camp conditions. Zyklon B was used for disinfection against typhus. Aerial photos of Auschwitz taken during the alleged period of nonstop killings do not show gassings or bodies being burned.
Auschwitz's gas chamber appears to have been reconstructed after the war. Allied aerial photos contradict claims that Nazis camouflaged the gas chambers. Forensic examinations of gas chambers at Auschwitz showed almost no Zyklon B residue, unlike disinfestation chambers.
An expert examined the facilities and determined they were incapable of supporting hydrogen cyanide gas executions due to design flaws: no gasketed doors, windows, or explosion-proof features. The design of the facilities made gassing impossible without killing the operators. Alleged eyewitness reports lack valid descriptions of gassings, suggesting there were no gassings.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know from years of my own research and the research of others that proofs of the holocaust are few. Literally, all there is are the eyewitness testimonies and postwar confessions. There's no picture, plan, or wartime document dealing with homicidal gas chambers or a plan to exterminate the Jews. And we can't use the excuse that the Nazis destroyed all the evidence because after we had broken the German code, we were able to intercept their secret transmissions, including those that came from Auschwitz. The key to understanding the Holocaust story is understanding the true nature of the things passed off as proofs.
Everything that is used as evidence of the Holocaust also can be said to have a perfectly normal explanation. For example, these exhibits are said to be the material proofs of exterminations. There's the piles of human hair. But what does that prove? It's acknowledged that each inmate had his or her head shaved because of the lice problem.
That's not denied. So why wouldn't there be piles of human hair? What about the piles of shoes and clothing? Is that a proof? It's a fact that the prisoners were issued a uniform upon arrival, including shoes.
So why wouldn't there be piles of inmates' shoes and clothing? It doesn't prove anybody was killed. What about the canisters of gas? No one denies that Zyklon B was used to disinfect clothes and also buildings. Zyklon B was one of the premier pest control agents in Europe at that time.
It was present in most of the concentration camps, including those that are not said to have had homicidal gas chambers in them. The typhus epidemic that spread throughout Europe during the war and also spread through the camps called for stringent lice control procedures. So what other proofs are offered? Well, there's the usual pictures of sick inmates, which proves the groundbreaking thesis that people got sick in the camp. Once again, I'll add that nobody denies the typhus epidemic, which resulted in many deaths.
Then there's the artwork and the pictures of children. But at this point, it's looking pretty bad for somebody looking for objective proofs of the gas chamber. And some of the proofs they present actually work against the concept. For example, they have one of several aerial photographs taken of Auschwitz by the Allies during the war. They don't mention, however, that when blown up, these photos don't show people being gassed or bodies being burned even though they were taken during the time killings were said to be going on almost nonstop.
Once inside, we can see why revisionists have had such a field day with this building. Obvious marks on the walls and floors where apparently walls had been knocked down, equally obvious holes in the floor where bathroom facilities had been. We maintain that unlike the large hollow chamber we now see. This room had once been five rooms, including a bathroom. Yet the building does have what appears to be evidence of criminal usage, four holes in the ceiling, which lead to the roof where four little chimneys stand.
It is said that through these four holes, cyclone B crystals were dropped. And indeed, there seems to be no other explanation for them. Do these holes prove homicidal gassings? Revisionists have claimed in the past that these holes were added after the camp's liberation and that the inside walls were knocked down and the bathroom facilities removed to make the room look like a big gas chamber. Let's start again talking about this building here.
Speaker 1: Notorium gas chamber.
Speaker 0: But this is a reconstruction.
Speaker 1: It is in original state.
Speaker 0: Original?
Speaker 1: Original state. It is in original part. Original. It is original. Original in through this chimney was from cyclone beam.
Speaker 0: Are those the original holes in
Speaker 1: the ceiling?
Speaker 0: They've been rebuilt? Yes. Okay. After the war? After the war.
Yes. This is Auschwitz Birkenau in an allied aerial photo from September 1944. The train that would come up carrying the doomed inmates, you would have thousands of inmates being marched off the trains into one of these two gas chambers in full view of the entire camp. This was a spectacle that nobody at the camp could miss. They would see thousands of people marching into those buildings and nobody coming out.
These were gas chambers that were not isolated from anyone. And indeed, when these aerial photographs were released in the late seventies, they contradicted many supposed eyewitness claims about how the Nazis had tried to camouflage the gas chambers at Birkenau. Another question that should be asked, is there any Zyklon b residue in the gas chamber knowing that cyanide gas would, in fact, leave a residue? In 1988, execution equipment expert Fred Lucher conducted forensic examinations on the gas chambers at Auschwitz to answer that question. He took samples from the four gas chambers at Birkenau, the one at the main camp, and the control sample from one of the disinfestation chambers that we know did use Zyklon B.
Now the gas chamber samples showed almost no appreciable traces, whereas the disinfestation sample literally went right off the scale. In 1990, the Institute of Forensic Research in Krakow decided to conduct their own forensic tests to see if they could refute Fred Lucher's findings, and their own tests got back the same results.
Speaker 2: With the exception of the video photographer, I brought the same things that I would have normally brought to a prison in The United States if I was doing a survey of their equipment. The draftsman was there to take and verify measurements. The drawings were made on-site and then reproduced when we returned to The United States to document everything we saw. I personally made photographs and produced a great deal of photographic evidence of the hardware and facilities that we found in Poland. And the video photographer, which was not a normal thing for me, was brought to document the fact that the forensic samples that I removed from the facilities, the control sample from the Lausing facility Number 1 of Birkenau, and all of the other samples from the alleged gas execution rooms were properly taken, packaged for and packaged for submission to the laboratories.
I examined the facilities, and I made a determination that they were incapable of supporting the use of hydrogen cyanide gas for purposes of execution or otherwise. But additionally, it would be necessary to move remove samples, return them to The United States for testing at an independent laboratory to, in fact, confirm what my visual inspection indicated, that these facilities never, in fact, contained hydrogen cyanide gas.
Speaker 3: What aside from the samples convinced you that these facilities could not have been used then or now as execution facilities?
Speaker 2: The samples in my mind were mainly corroborative. The reasons that I determined that these facilities were not or never could have been gas execution facilities are stated in my report. And it does it mainly is concerned with the design fabrication of these facilities, the requirements necessary in the design of a facility that contains a highly explosive and highly poisonous gas. You must have gasketed doors, no windows, means of getting the gas in, means of getting the gas out, something for heating the gas and the air to constantly keep the right temperature, explosion proof switches, lighting facilities, etc. None of these ever existed.
We are talking about brick and mortar buildings without heat, with non explosion proof lighting, without gasketed doors, in some cases without doors at all, and with crematories that opened very close or adjacent to the facility. If these facilities were used for gas execution facilities, if those persons operating the facilities didn't gas themselves to death at the same time that the executees died, they certainly would have been blown to bits when the gas exploded from a spark arc in a switch, the heat of a light bulb, or the gas approaching and getting into the crematory furnace. I mean, it's just ludicrous to consider that these facilities could have been used as gas chambers.
Speaker 3: Well, we all know from reading the newspapers and watching TV that there's many holocaust survivors who say that they actually saw gassings. They describe them in minute detail, which relative it was they lost, down to the color of the corpses and the color of the smoke coming out of the chimney. How do you respond to these people? Well, one of the things
Speaker 2: that was necessary for me to do, Kirk, at the outset, so I'd have an understanding of what I was doing was read the literature and alleged eyewitness reports so I could make a determination of the protocol, which that's a fancy word that we use in terms of executions for determining, for what the actual procedure is for the execution. And I found through these investigations that there was no such a thing as an eyewitness. I have never seen a report that was written by anyone who had a valid description of what could have happened at a gassing. So the long and the short of it is there are no eyewitnesses because there were no gassings.
@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne
Next, let's take a look at how German confessions were obtained through torture, the infamous human lampshade and soap claims, and one of the more interesting Holocaust facts: No document has ever been found showing Hitler ordered any systematic mass exterminations https://t.co/bOLWqwZMXG
Video Transcript AI Summary
Cyclone B was dropped into the death chamber, killing people in 3-15 minutes. The screaming stopped when they were dead. Special commandos removed rings and extracted gold from teeth. Children were exterminated because they couldn't work.
Rudolf Herr's confession was obtained by the British through torture before he was turned over to the Soviets and Poles. This was confirmed in "Legions of Death" by Bernard Clark, who bragged about torturing Herr and threatening his family.
The speaker wishes the Fuhrer had taken responsibility for his commands, stating he was their sovereign. The speaker would rather die than see the sovereign subjected to humiliation in a foreign court, believing the Fuhrer would have taken responsibility.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Cyclone b dropped into the death chamber from a small opening. It took from three to fifteen minutes. We knew when the people were dead because their screaming stopped. After the bodies were removed, our special commandos took off the rings and extracted the gold from the teeth of the corpses. Children of tender years were invariably exterminated since by reason of their youth, they were unable to work.
Is that all true and correct, witness? Yes.
Speaker 1: It was the British who obtained by torture the confession of Rudolf Herr's commandant of Auschwitz before turning him over to the Soviets and Poles. This has been confirmed in a book published in 1983 titled Legions of Death, which contains the recollections of British Sergeant Bernard Clark, who brags about having tortured Hearst get a confession out of him and of threatening his family. It was here that Hearst was hanged.
Speaker 0: I rather wish the Fuhrer had stood by his followers and taken the responsibility for his command. Think of his position. Oh, sure. His position is chief war criminal. Right?
He was our sovereign. It would be intolerable for me to have him standing before a foreign court. You men knew the furor. He would be the first one to stand up and say, I gave the orders, and I shall take full responsibility. And I would rather die painless than have the sovereign subjected to such humiliation.
@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne
Now, let’s take a look at the evidence against the gas chambers and mass graves as well as some of the numeric anomalies of the Holocaust The first clip is Fred Leuchter who wrote an infamous report called The Leuchter Report that comprehensively examined Auschwitz
Video Transcript AI Summary
According to multiple experts, the facilities at Auschwitz, Birkenau, and Lublin were not capable of supporting mass executions using any lethal gas. Germa Rudolf's chemical analysis allegedly concluded that Hydrocyonic Acid was not used in buildings claimed to be homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz. Walter Liftel's report stated that homicidal gassings were impossible for technical reasons. William B. Lindsay affirmed that no one was purposefully killed with cyclone B in that manner.
Reports from the Krakow Forensic Institute and others corroborate these findings. Ground-penetrating radar at Treblinka allegedly revealed no ash or disturbance, suggesting mass graves never existed there. Charles Larsen found no evidence of death by poison gas in autopsies performed in German camps. No Prussian blue cyanide staining was found on walls in the alleged death chambers, only in delousing chambers.
The Auschwitz Museum curator allegedly admitted that the Soviets altered a German bomb shelter after the war to create a homicidal gas chamber. The building presented as a gas chamber has features inconsistent with that purpose, such as a manhole escape hatch, a door that opens inward, and locks on the inside. Le Express acknowledged that everything about this gas chamber is false and that it is a deceitful postwar reconstruction. Olga Vorum Sarnikot stated Auschwitz had no gas chamber, and a fake chimney was built by the Soviets.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: None of the facilities examined at Auschwitz, Birkenau, or Lublin could have supported or in fact did ever support multiple executions utilizing hydrogen cyanide, carbon monoxide, or any other allegedly or factually lethal gas. Based upon very generous maximum usage rates for all the alleged gas chambers totaling some 1,693 persons per week and assuming these facilities could support gas executions, it would have required sixty eight years to execute the alleged number of 6,000,000 presses. Promoting these facilities as being capable of affecting mass, multiple, or even singular executions is both ludicrous and insulting to every individual on this planet.
Speaker 1: Germa Rudolf is a chemist who knew winter of nineteen ninety-ninety one while working towards a doctorate in chemistry at the renowned Max Planck Institute for Solid State Physics in Stuttgart, began a scientific investigation of the credibility of the Leuchter Report. His detailed chemical analysis concluded that Hydrocyonic Acid was not used in the buildings alleged to have been homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz. His report strengthens the findings of Fred Leuchter. The prominent Austrian engineer, Walter Liftel, also made a report concluding that the homicidal gassings were impossible for technical reasons and because they are incompatible with observable laws on nature. Liftel's report is further authoritative confirmation of the findings of Fred Loister.
The American research chemist Doctor. William B. Lindsay also made careful examinations of the alleged gas chambers. After thirty three years of experience as a chemist, he declared and affirmed under oath, I have come to the conclusion that no one was willfully or purposefully killed with cyclone B in this manner. I consider it impossible.
The Krakow Forensic Institute, Robert Farison, Fredrik Turban, Jan Ball, Carlo Matano, Jurgen Graf, Anne Sundal, David Macaldon, and many others who also have carried out similar technical inspections of the alleged gas chambers have come to the same conclusion. A brave Jewish revisionist named David Cole made a groundbreaking documentary called Cole in Auschwitz in 1992. Today, are many future length documentaries, analyses and commentary on the German labor camps. In 1999, Ricker Creek, a qualified electronics engineer, and his team of researchers carried out a high-tech exam of the soil in the alleged death camp Treblinka. Using ground penetrating radar for three weeks, the team found that the ground was never even disturbed, and core samples revealed no ash.
The results obtained show with 100% certainty that mass graves never even existed in Triplinka or Belzec. There are, in fact, many mass graves in the East. However, this was where the Soviets massacred people. Today, it is well known that, for example, the Katy massacre was committed by the Soviets, but was blamed on the Germans after the war. Doctor Charles Larsen, one of Americans leading pathologists as part of a US war crimes investigation team, performed more than 1,000 autopsies of the dead bodies in the German camps, and none showed any evidence of death by poison gas.
If there had been gassings with carbon monoxide or cyanide, the indications would have been extremely dramatic and readily visible. The courses would have been bright sherry red. No Prussian blue cyanide staining was found on walls in the alleged death chambers. Only in the delousing chambers are ample amounts of evidence of gassings, where cyclone B was used on clothes and bedding to stop the spread of typhus. The Auschwitz Museum curator admitted that the Soviets created the homicidal gas chamber after the war by altering a German bomb shelter.
In the bomb shelter presented to us as a homicidal gas chamber in Auschwitz, the communists removed the walls and made the infamous cyclone b holes in the roof to make it look like a real gas chamber.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Now when you go into that Cream of One building, you're gonna see it. It just looks kinda weird. It has all these dirt mounds all around it. You know, really, it looks like a a bomb shelter, and that's exactly what it was at the end of the war.
It was a bomb shelter. They want you to think that 4,000,000 people went through Wash Woods, and they made it look like all the people went through that camp there. But that building there was not capable or made for gassing people, alright, at all. I mean, you know, you go inside it, they they they chop holes in the roof at the end, and it's just ridiculous. I mean, there's no way people were were killed in that building.
So they want you to believe that this is the building that people were gassed in. It just wasn't feasible that people were gassed in that building.
Speaker 3: The thing now, that building, where they end the tour, that was never a gas chamber. There was a chimney next to it and there were four holes in the ceiling where the Zyklon B granules would be dumped and people would see the holes and they could explore them and look around. What I did in 'ninety two, I interviewed the man who was the director, the curator, for lack of a better word, of of the camp. And he admitted to me on camera, not a hidden camera shoot. It was a open two camera shoot in his office.
It was me and my camera woman. And he admitted on camera that the building displayed as the gas chamber is not in its original state, that when the Soviets liberated the camp, that building was an air raid shelter, a very obvious, very clear air raid shelter. And then the Soviets remodeled it to look like what their conception of the gas chamber is. Now there's no backup evidence to prove that this building was ever a gas chamber. There's no Zyklon blue cyanide staining on the walls.
There were no four holes in the roof to dump in the Zyklon B. The Soviets added those. There there had been dividing walls. Inside the room, the Soviets knocked those down to make it look like one big open chamber. They ripped up the bathroom facilities.
You can still see the drains in the floor. You can still see the holes where the toilet and the sink had led into, but they took out all the facilities and they carved a doorway where there had not been a door to make it look like there was a progression from the gas chamber to the oven room. But there was a lot of stuff that they didn't bother to cover up. There's a gigantic manhole right in the middle of the gas
Speaker 2: chamber. Yeah.
Speaker 3: A manhole that any adult, even a fairly heavy set adult can go down into. Now what that is, that was an escape hatch, was fairly standard design procedure that underground or partially underground bomb shelters would have an escape hatch in case rubble or anything else prevented the people inside from exiting the bomb shelter through the main door. So you have this manhole that no one had noticed for at that point, Auschwitz, when I went there in '91, Auschwitz had been open to the the West for over a decade. No one ever noticed the damn manhole, and it's right there clear as day. The door to the chamber opens in.
In other words, if you if it was a gas chamber and you stuck people in there and they they would all pile up against the door trying to bang their way out, they would die there. In order to open the door again, you'd have to push against a mound of 50, a 200, three hundred bodies. The, the door locks on the inside, not the outside. In other words, the the victims would be able to lock the Germans out, which which is just kind of a a silly thing to think of.
Speaker 1: In January 1995, the prestigious French weekly magazine, Le Express, acknowledged that everything about this gas chamber is false and that it is in fact a deceitful postwar reconstruction. French Jewish Olga Vorum Sarnikot wrote a book about the National Socialist concentration camps in which she stated Auschwitz, which was to remain the model camp and simultaneously the administrative center, had no gas chamber. A fake chimney was also built by the Soviets in 1947. It has no opening, and it is not even connected to the building. German prisoners were
Speaker 0: also
@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne
Next, David Irving discusses the lack of sufficient combustibles for cremations, the Germans making no references to gas chambers in private or public documents, and the fact the gas chambers on the Auschwitz tour are “reconstructions” and not original https://t.co/v9a0A8b9PV
Video Transcript AI Summary
According to a reader's letter, calling a gas chamber a fake is wrong because it's a reconstruction. The speaker equates the reconstructed gas chamber to a fake $20 bill. The speaker claims authorities have been showing a reconstruction to schoolchildren for 50 years without disclosing it's not original, which he believes is deceptive. He was fined for pointing out this embarrassment.
The speaker questions why the fake building is shown when genuine ruins are nearby. He suggests people might question the crematorium's true purpose, possibly for typhus victims. While acknowledging crimes against Jews, he argues about the scale and intent. He questions how 1,000,000 people could be cremated in Auschwitz, citing the implausibility of the required coke supply being absent from aerial photos and records.
He claims archives haven't been properly researched and it would have been impossible to remove all gas chamber references from records at the end of the Third Reich. British intelligence read German secret messages, including those from the commandant of Auschwitz, which detailed prisoner statistics but contained no reference to gassings. He dismisses eyewitness evidence as insufficient without archival support, referencing the John Demianuk case.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: By academics around the world. He then goes on in his readers letter to say, it is also totally wrong to call that gas chamber a fake. It's a reconstruction. If mister Irving doesn't know the difference between a reconstruction and a fake, then he shouldn't call himself a historian. So said this reader's letter in the New Zealand Herald three days ago.
To which my to which my response is to which my response is, a fake, like the bomb scare that's just been telephoned to this hotel. That is a fake. If this mister Rubin was to offer me a reconstructed, a reconstruction of a $20 bill, I don't think I'd accept that. That is what I would call a fake. If for fifty years, the authorities in Auschwitz have been showing a building to busloads of shuddering school children from all over Europe, telling them that is the gas chamber where the Nazis killed millions of Jews.
And if they haven't had the honesty to write in big letters above the door, what you are seeing is just a reconstruction on the basis of eyewitness testimony, then that is a fake. They have concealed the fact that it's a reconstruction which makes it a fake. And I'm fined $22,000 for pointing this fact out because it's an embarrassment. Of course, it's an embarrassment. The embarrassment is, of course, why do they show the schoolchildren the fake building here when allegedly there were genuine gas chamber ruins just down the road three or four miles away?
Well, that's because people start asking questions. They say this is odd, ruins of a gas chamber, but I think according to maps I've seen this was the crematorium, not a gas chamber at all. Four crematorium in Auschwitz because they had immense typhus problems. They had epidemics with tens of thousands of the inmates dying, which is a crime. And anybody who says to me, David Irving says it wasn't a crime, what happened to the Jews in Auschwitz or elsewhere, is also doing me an injustice because there was undoubtedly a crime.
But we're arguing about scale. We're arguing about intent. We're arguing about the how how and the why and the wherefore. And this is what we are not allowed to do. This is what questions like, how do you cremate 1,000,000 people in Auschwitz?
If cremating one person takes 40 to 60 kilograms of coke, that means that to cremate 1,000,000 people is gonna take 40 to 60,000 tons of coke. And where are those 40 or 60,000 tons of coke? They are not visible on any of the aerial photographs, nor are there truckloads of coke being driven up, nor are there railway lines bringing in the wagon loads of coke. So that is, pre opacity by itself, improbable. And anyway, these four crematory, we know exactly what their handling capacity was, how many cadavers could be cremated at a time.
We know they couldn't have cremated more than tops seventy, eighty, 90 thousand people in the four or five years that the camp was in existence. These are the technical questions that people ask. And not only that, you have the problem that people say, no doubt the Nazis destroyed all the records. At the end of World War two, everything was destroyed, of course. That's what the Nazis were like.
They covered their tracks. Well, ladies and gentlemen, I'm obnoxious historian who's worked for fifty years in the archives, and those archives have still not been properly researched. They're still in total disarray. And believe me, it would not have been possible in the last one or two weeks of the collapsing Third Reich for somebody to go around all the archives taking out all the references to gas chambers if they were in it, or all the references to the final solution if there were any, and destroying. They couldn't defend it.
And even if they could have destroyed all the German records relating to the final solution and all the German records which contained the fatal word gas chamber, so that there aren't any left in the archives now in Germany, they couldn't. The Nazis have destroyed what is in the British files. Because you see, we British were reading the German files. We were reading the German secret messages. When the commandant of Auschwitz Concentration Camp sent a message to Berlin reporting what he was doing, giving the actual daily statistics of how many prisoners were arriving, how many were leaving, how many were in the camp at midnight, how many had died.
We have those code messages in Britain. Those actual code messages from the commandant of Auschwitz, we know what he reported. And the chief historian of the British Secret Service who printed this in volume two of the official British history of the Secret Service as an appendix. He states, it's quite evident that huge numbers of people died in Auschwitz Concentration Camp from typhus epidemics, from illness and disease. A small number died from execution being executed by hanging or shooting.
And then he goes on to say, there is no reference in the intercepted telegrams to anybody being gassed. No reference at all. Hundreds and hundreds of code telegrams and the top secret SS code, and there's no reference to anybody being gassed in Auschwitz. These are the kind of documents which mean something to me as a historian. And that is why when people say, but what about all the eyewitness evidence?
I say eyewitness evidence baloney. Tell that to John Demianuk about eyewitness evidence, the man, the Cleveland Auto Worker, who was nearly hanged in Israel on the basis of eyewitness evidence until the Jewish judges in Israel, this Israeli Supreme Court said this evidence was not good enough. They themselves had to acquit John Denyano, admitting that eyewitness evidence alone was not good enough, and that the eyewitnesses had erred and that they had identified the wrong man. Eyewitness evidence is not good enough if there is a total lack of collateral evidence in the archives. And here we have to say there is no such evidence.
The Auschwitz record
@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne
With so many Holocaust survivors telling stories of the camps many have turned out to be inaccurate From the infamous Elie Wiesel to the lady who claimed to be raised by wolves, here’s just a few of the Holocaust claims that have turned out to be flawed https://t.co/CYo2SSoypX
Video Transcript AI Summary
Captured Nazi officials and Jewish survivors gave Holocaust testaments, including claims of gassings, Jew-eating animals, vaporizing Jews with atomic energy, torture to the "Tango of Death," steaming Jews, electrocution, musical camp dogs, tickling homosexuals to death, blood gazers, Jews made into lampshades and soap, and Nazi masturbation machines.
Herman Rosenblatt gained fame for his story about a girl throwing him apples in a concentration camp, which led to a book and movie deal, but the story was false. Rosenblatt maintained it was his "imagination" and remained unrepentant.
Other false Holocaust narratives include Mitig Grocer plagiarizing from fiction, Josef Hurt fabricating an escape from Auschwitz, Otto Utkinant lying about his experiences, and Misha DeFunsheca's fabricated memoir about being raised by wolves. Misha had to repay $22.5 million. Miklos Gruner claims Elie Wiesel stole the identity of Lazar Wiesel and that Wiesel's claims about burning babies are scientifically impossible.
Paul Rasinier and other camp survivors denied knowledge of gas chambers or mass murder. Benedict Kochsky stated he never saw gas chambers in any camp, including Auschwitz. Marika Frank, an Auschwitz internee, testified she saw nothing of gas chambers. Jewish writer Gerrard Menounin called the Holocaust "the biggest lie in history." Jewish professor Norman Fiegelsang said the Holocaust deflects criticism of Israel. Jewish chief rabbi Aria Friedman called the Holocaust a "successful historical fiction." Jewish professor Roger de Margo claims gassing with cyanide acid is impossible and that the numbers of Jews killed are inaccurate.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The actual Holocaust stories comes from two sources: the captured high officials of the National Socialist Party that were coerced and tortured during the Nuremberg trials and the actual Jewish survivors that came out of those concentration camps. These Jewish testaments ranged from gassings, Jew eating bears and eagles in cages, vaporizing 20,000 Jews near Auschwitz with atomic energy, torturing and killing Jewish prisoners to the tempo of a specially composed Tango of Death. Steaming Jews to death like lobsters at Treblinka, electrocuting them to death, musical camp dogs ripping Jews who played false in the orchestras to death, homosexuals being tickled to death, gazers of Jewish blood, Jews being made into lampshades and soap, carts on rails that threw Jews into the ovens directly, Nazi masturbation machines and yeah, additional testaments that were given are just as ludicrous.
Speaker 1: The one thing
Speaker 2: that I'll never forget that I heard, and he said, the Nazis are taking our our young Jewish infants, and they're tearing them in half by their legs, and they're throwing them in the nester. The nester is a river. So they said, for every person that's gonna take their lives, they're gonna torture to death five of us. Then they punished us. For every man that ran to the wire.
They they took a hundred inmates, and they killed them in front of everybody. The greatest love story we've ever told on
Speaker 0: this show. Oh my goodness.
Speaker 3: Herman Rosenblatt received international attention for his story about being a hungry little boy in a Nazi concentration camp who was thrown apples every day by a little girl on the other side of the fence. Years later, according to the story, Rosenblatt met that same girl on a blind date in New York City, and he proposed on the spot.
Speaker 2: I used to come by every day, bring the apple, have in my jacket and a piece of bread, and he used to say, I'll see you tomorrow.
Speaker 3: The story landed Herman and Roma Rosenblatt on Oprah twice and in newspapers all over the world. They also got a book and movie deal, but the story wasn't true. Why did you do it? Why did you tell such a big lie to so many people for so long?
Speaker 4: It wasn't a lie. It was I it was my imagination. And in my imagination, in my mind, I believed it. Even now, I believe it. That she was there, and she threw the apple to me.
Speaker 3: How how can you say it wasn't a lie? It it wasn't true, and and you know it's not true.
Speaker 4: Yes. It's not true. But in my imagination, it was true.
Speaker 3: Members of his own family say his real motivation was money. Herman and Roma Rosenblatt told their false story publicly for more than a decade, but it all fell apart about six weeks ago after Holocaust scholars proved that it was physically impossible for prisoners to approach the fence at the concentration camp where Herman was kept and that Roma's family was actually more than 200 miles away at the time. Rosenblatt is remarkably unrepentant about his years of lying.
Speaker 4: I pronounce my love for you forever.
Speaker 3: When you look at that, does it make you uncomfortable at all? No. You think that was the right thing to do?
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 3: And and and while you were up on the stage there with all these people, in the back of your mind, you not thinking I'm not telling the truth here. No. So if you had to do it over again, would you tell the same story? Yeah. You would?
Yes.
Speaker 2: I simply don't know what to say. I mean, it's his imagination, but he knows it's not true.
Speaker 3: He said he made up he made up a fantasy world, and he was living in that fantasy world.
Speaker 2: And his son says, tried to stop him? Yes. Good heavens. Okay. Thank you, Dan.
Pleasure.
Speaker 0: Mitig Grocer towards Sweden talking to children, telling them of the horrors of the German concentration camps. It turned out that his story was directly plagiarized from a fictional book called Mila 18 from 1961. Josef Hurt from Pennsylvania gave public speeches for years where he claimed to have escaped from Auschwitz and even met evil Nazi doctor, Josef Mengele. He had now confessed that he had fabricated the entire story. He admitted that everything was a lie.
Hurt had even tattooed a fake prison number on his arm to make people believe in his lies. Otto Utkinant had for years been paid shekels to lecture in German schools about his experiences of the Holocaust. He has talked about the Crystal Knight, how he lost 72 relatives including mother, father and sister and how he himself was interned at Buchenwald. However, Otto now admits that the whole story was a lie. Misha DeFunsheca wrote a best selling memoir about her experience of the Holocaust.
Her story was published almost twenty years ago as Misha, a Memoir of the Holocaust Years. The book describes how when she was six, her Jewish parents were taken from their home by the Nazis and how she set off across Belgium and Germany and Poland to find them on foot, leaving out stolen scraps of food until she was adopted by a pack of wolves. She also claimed to have shot a Nazi soldier in self defense. The story became a huge bestseller and was even made into a film in France. But in 02/2008 it was found to be fabricated and everything was a lie.
The author whose real name was found to be Monica de Valle said that it is not the true reality but it's my reality. There are times when I find it difficult to differentiate between reality and my inner world. Misha will now have to pay back the money she was awarded, which amounts to $22,500,000 Elie Wiesel has told us for fifty years that while at Auschwitz he was tattooed on his left arm the number A7713. He also adds that his father was given the number A7712, but a real Auschwitz survivor, Miklos Gruner claims that Elie Wiesel is an impostor. Miklos who actually was at the camp claims that Elie Wiesel stole the identity of a real man named Lazar Wiesel who the number eighty seven thousand seven hundred thirteen actually belonged to.
First of all, if you look at his arms, Elie Wiesel does not have a tattoo. The number 8700712 actually were given to a man named Abraham Wiesel, Lazar's older brother. Eli Wiesel never claimed that he saw any homicidal gas chambers, instead he claims that he witnessed evil Germans throwing Jewish babies in gigantic flames sleeping up from a ditch. But this has also been debunked by scientists, historians and engineers. Auschwitz was built on a swamp with a high water table which made it impossible for bodies to have been burned in ditches.
Not to mention that it was impossible for human bodies to be totally consumed by flames in this manner because of lack of oxygen. Miklos however says that he never saw any ditches where children were burning. Eli Wiesel explains that some events do take place but are not true. Others are, although they never occurred. In 1986, Miklos Gruner met Eli Wiesel in Stockholm.
Miklos thought that he was going to meet Lazar Wiesel. But after the meeting Miklos said, I was stunned to see a man I did not recognize at all. He was not my fellow prisoner. Miklus also was surprised that Eli couldn't speak Hungarian, but spoke English with a strong French accent, even though Huizel claims that he was born in Hungary. Neither Elie Wiesel nor his father, Shlomo Wiesel, are named in any records from Auschwitz or Buchenwald.
After the war, Elie Wiesel joined the Jewish terrorist group Irgun. Anyway, Elie Wiesel is today laughing all the way to the bank as his best selling book Night brought him international recognition at millions of dollars. He even won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1986. Out of thousands of real Jewish survivors from the German camps, the international Jewish community handpicked Zionist and hate filled liars to spread anti German propaganda. But of course, not all Jews are lying.
Many Jews don't agree with the Holocaust narrative, and many of them testified that they never saw any mass murders or gassings. But these Jews have effectively been silenced by anti free speech, signist organizations to cover up the truth. Paul Rasinier was arrested by the Gestapo in October 1943 and deported to Germany, where he was held prisoner until the end of the war in Buchenwald and Dora Concentration Camps. Rasinier was upset by the many lies and myths about the concentration camps that were being circulated. French resistance members who also were interned in various German concentration camps during the war including Auschwitz and other alleged death camps, they all gave accounts of their treatment by the Germans and they all denied any knowledge of gas chambers and a mass murder program in the camps.
Rysigner said that never at any moment did the responsible authorities of the Third Reich intend to order or in fact order the extermination of the Jews in this or any other manner. Maria van Herwarden testified about her camp experience in a Toronto District Court in March 1988. She testified that she witnessed the deaths of many fellow inmates by deceased and particularly typhus, and she saw some take their own lives, but she saw no evidence at all of mass killings, gassings or of any extermination program. The Jew Benedict Kochsky, who spent the years from 1938 to 1945 in concentration camps, three of these in Auschwitz, said: I was in the big concentration camps in Germany. I must truthfully state that in no camp have I ever seen anything that might have resembled gas chambers.
A Jewish woman named Marika Frank arrived at Auschwitz Birkenau from Hungary in July 1944, when 25,000 Jews were supposedly gassed and cremated daily according to the official story. She testified after the war that she heard and saw nothing of gas chambers during the time she was interned there. Jewish writer Gerrard Menounin says, the Holocaust is the biggest lie in history. Germany has no blame for the second world war. That Jewish pressure has inflicted laws on democratic societies to prevent questions and incessant promotion and indoctrination of the same advertently inconsistable Holocaust proves it must be a lie.
Why else would no one be allowed to question it? Jewish professor Norman Fiegelsang says, the Holocaust proved to be the perfect weapon for deflecting criticism of Israel. The Holocaust may yet turn out to be the greatest robbery in the history of mankind. Jewish chief rabbi Aria Friedman says, the Holocaust is a successful historical fiction. Jewish professor Roger de Margo said
Speaker 1: I know that the problem, for instance, of the Holocaust is a complete fake because it's very easy to know because it's it's a simple technical arithmetic problem which could be solved by a child in high school. Any chemist know that you can't gas people with cyanide acid. Let's call it that in English. Hydrocynic Hydrocynic acid. 1,000 or 2,000 people at the time, it's well known, and, even the most important American Jewish newspapers, like the American Jewish Yearbook, said that there was 3,003,000 Jews in occupied Europe in 1942.
So I don't see how they could have killed 6,000,000 Jews when there was only three millions. You know, they So I think anybody can see that. I I listed in 1944. I see. I listed for three years, nineteen forty four.
It was in the world. The world finished in 1945. But I was in the army 1944 because, of course, as everybody did, I believe that Hitler was the real monster that everybody said he was. But since I have studied what happened in Nazism, under Nazism, what Hitler did want to do and say when you read these books, what maybe anybody can read Mein Kampfel can read myth of the twentieth century by Rosenberg. And anybody can know also what happened these last fifty years when declared I absolutely had nothing to do and not the slightest influence because Nazi has been there now for fifty years.
So you can do what happened. And what happens, I told you in my my lecture, it's absolutely incredible. And at the top of everything, you can see the Jews. I told you, I studied the books which really expresses Nazism, that is to say, Meigumpf and the myth of the twentieth century by Rosenberg. As to what's happened during the war, and especially what Hitler actually did, which is hidden, which is concealed to us.
What what he did in Germany. And the only know thing we know about Hitler is that he killed 6,000,000 Jews who never existed in gas chambers, which nobody ever saw. That's all that's the only thing which people know about Hitler. But when you really know that this what he did, what he actually did in Germany, well, when you have studied all that, you see that you have been completely completely misled to use a
Speaker 0: mild
@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne
Next, what was life was like inside the “death” camps? Well, surprisingly, the camps had theaters, swimming pools, soccer leagues, orchestras, and even plays But don’t take my word for it, let some Holocaust survivors tell you themselves: https://t.co/Samxwpo3Au
Video Transcript AI Summary
Cultural activities occurred in Auschwitz, including theater performances in Block 1. A grand piano was brought in, and a stage curtain was sewn with inmate assistance. One inmate helped transcribe music for the orchestra, finding the work peaceful. There was a library, newspapers, and violin quartets. Movies, mostly German, were shown in the evenings for a fee.
Inmates could receive money from outside and buy items like cigarettes and weak beer at a canteen. Soccer teams were formed, with games organized even in Gross Rosen as the war progressed. Civilians sometimes helped, even playing soccer with inmates.
Weddings and maternity wards existed, with over 3,000 live births in Auschwitz and no infant deaths during German rule. A nursery was established, and an inmate painted a mural in the children's barracks, depicting a Swiss chalet scene and, at the children's request, Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. The children then created a play based on Snow White. A brothel, hospitals, and dental facilities also existed in the camp. Camp authorities tried to keep inmates alive and healthy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We also had an orchestra where some of the musicians stood together and one musician was so good that he had the instruments playing and he wrote the notes. So later on we had a band who played over the weekend. And, that was, of course, helping us. You know, we also did plays and stuff.
Speaker 1: Were there any cultural activities happening in Auschwitz? Yes. I told you we had a piano put into a not just a piano, a grand piano was brought into Block 1. Once that was built, that new block, the downstairs room was assigned for theatre. When he wanted to build a stage curtain in that new Block 1, which was one big dining room was going to be also with the stage, so performances could be done for women there, culture.
He said, for heaven's sake, isn't there anybody here who can help me sew on these curtain rings for the stage. I do it for you, he says. And I came forward and I helped him with the curtain stage. And that was wonderful because I had a man sitting across me for a change. And my room mate is in charge of work assignments.
And if you happen to know music, what instruments do you play? I said, I learned piano, but not good enough for an orchestra. I can tell you that right now. He said, well then maybe you know the notes. I said, yes.
He said, well then I can use you because we have to write it from the original music piece what the director gets to the instruments. And so for each instrument has only short line on the whole paper. So I had to take it apart and write for each instrument. From that what I had to do. I had to even make the lines.
We didn't have paper that was pre printed for notes, nothing. So I spent the whole day there for a while until we were taken away from Auschwitz. But then she saw me work there, I had a big table where I could work and lay out all the paper and it was very peaceful and relaxing. And wanted to talk more to me. That is when I met that SS man at one time.
That was the last job I did while I was in Auschwitz. And when I the other job that when I was in Block 10, we went out to pick the leaves. And from these leaves, they would make tea for the whole camp, for the whole Auschwitz.
Speaker 2: How did you entertain yourselves?
Speaker 3: Well, there were at that at at the beginning of those days, there was a library where you people could get books to read. There were newspapers that we could get. And that and also among ourselves sometimes we had a violin quartet used to come and play in barracks. And they even later on, they said they're gonna build a movie in the camp. And the prisoners said said, only you must be crazy.
They're make a movie for us in in in the camp. And then it happened. They made a movie in the camp. Yeah. And we we went in barracks after barrack.
We we could go to see a movie sometimes in the evening. They brought movies in to the in the evening. And
Speaker 2: What kind of movies would they show?
Speaker 3: German movies. Once I came to the main camp, they were allowed twice a month to ride home. Once a postcard and once a letter.
Speaker 2: They gave you the materials?
Speaker 3: Yeah. They gave us the letter, the materials, and we could
Speaker 2: How did
Speaker 1: you get the stamps?
Speaker 3: Stamps. We could buy stamps.
Speaker 2: Could You had money?
Speaker 3: Yeah. We got my we still got my with the money we got through the Jewish community from Vienna who sent us. Everybody, you some money.
Speaker 2: And and in the camp you could have currency?
Speaker 3: Yeah. They could have money because there was in camp also what they call a cantina and not many times, but once in a while they sold a few cigarettes or they sold something, whatever they had. So if you had money, you could buy in that cantina there. Food, there wasn't really any food really. They usually sold and sometimes they sold they sold some weak beer that sold also in the in the yeah.
But not really anything else, not much. Mostly cigarettes.
Speaker 2: And when you went to the movies, did you have to pay?
Speaker 3: Yes. We had to pay. After the the money stopped, the regular money stopped, we got paid in coupons then.
Speaker 2: Paid for your work?
Speaker 3: Well, I don't know if it was for whatever. We got paid for in coupons for which were redeemable in the in that canteen if they had something. So that was their their way of distributing money then to everybody, everybody got this money then.
Speaker 0: Of course what we did is for the weekends we got together, we got a group of us together and we made a soccer team which was about a little later where we
Speaker 4: played soccer. It's amazing that there would be a soccer team, that there'd be
Speaker 3: enough energy left to do something like that.
Speaker 0: Well, I don't think we were quite as energetic as we were with the other regular team, but we did something to, you know, it kept our mind off these, of the problems we had.
Speaker 5: Especially the Germans started losing the war, 1943, '19 '40 '4. So 1944 we had soccer games in Rosrose. Soccer teams, we organized very well, soccer teams, each nationality organized a soccer team and we organized our equipment and everything to play soccer in the assembly line and assembly place. In Rosen. In Gross Rosen.
So, you know, that much free it was in there, but it was like the 44. Russians already pushed away, Americans already invaded on the other side, so there they have to give more freedom. But that was much more freedom and food didn't improve very much because simple reason, they didn't have it very much themselves.
Speaker 6: Did the civilians try to help you at all? Did they trade goods for things?
Speaker 5: It's as I say, we have almost everything, what we wanted, whether it's soccer teams, from the civilians, from Markside civilians. But that
Speaker 3: was
Speaker 5: strictly under the cover. They knew it but they didn't do much about it because they knew the war was almost all of us. They didn't, they even played soccer with us. Just to make the store funny, the toy incident funny that one time the Polish team played against German teams and one of the top enlisted assessment decided he wants to play for the Polish team. So we say okay, you can play for us.
And then the commandant, SS commandant, he was like a captain. He decided to want to play for the German team. So, he went in the field. I think they were a little bit tipsy.
Speaker 6: How did you feel about that?
Speaker 5: And the funny part of it, we said, you just let them play, they play almost by themselves. We just run around them. But that was one of the incidents which stuck so funny in it. But that's happened, it was 1944, it almost things came to close.
Speaker 6: So, what you're saying then that the closer the end of the war came, pressure was let up rather than becoming more cool?
Speaker 5: In our camp, you did feel the pressure made up.
Speaker 7: There were weddings and even maternity wards for pregnant women. Inmates were falling in love and getting married in the camps. Over three thousand live births were registered in Auschwitz alone, with not a single infant death while it was in operation under German rule. The evil Nazis even set up a nursery for the children.
Speaker 8: Freddie Hirsch called me to the children's barracks he was heading then, and he asked me if I could paint something on the wall for the children. And I said, well, if you can get the materials, he said, I'll get the materials. I said, okay. And then a very handsome young blonde man from the men's camp came over one day. And Freddie Hirsch called me to come and meet him.
And he asked me what I need. So I said, well, if I can get any wall paints, so any tempera paints, I would like those. If you can get me some, and he said, yes. Anything you want. And so before I knew it, Freddie had the stuff ready for me, and I started painting.
At first, not knowing what, I looked at that huge drab. It was kind of olive colored like all the barracks were wall. And I thought, well, the thing to do is to make it look like we are in a Swiss chalet on the deck, and there is a balustrade with flowers and flower pots on it. And we are looking out at the beautiful meadows and maybe see some cows and sheep and stuff, and I started painting. And then afterwards, far in the distance, I was putting some sheep and some cows, and then I noticed that all the kids were standing around me, behind me.
So I turned around and I asked them if they would do they have any special wish what to put in that meadow? And they said, Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. And that was a very surprising answer. So I made a painting of Dopey standing on another dwarf's head with a cloak around him so he looked like a tall guy, so he would be as tall as Snow White. And they were dancing together, and the shoes, those soft shoes and everything.
And the kids loved it. And I made some other dwarves around, one who was playing the accordion. I think there was Grumpy, the mean one. And the professor with the glasses. I made almost all the dwarfs standing around.
Some of them were clapping, and that's what the kids like. I now understand that there was another painter who continued something painting on the walls after I've left. I don't know about that.
Speaker 9: When you were in the process of doing that
Speaker 8: Yeah.
Speaker 9: What did it do not only for for you, but for the for the children
Speaker 8: on on an emotional level. Well, it did several things, not just emotional, but the children then wrote a play which was a satire of Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. So I figured out a way of making a crown out of paper, and the kids were painting it gold and putting, like, jewels on it. And then I took some paper strips and I painted them with a black paint. And I don't know about the costumes, what what they made costumes out of, but the play was very successful because the little girl who was, playing Snow White had an incredible voice, a gorgeous soprano, just like the one that you hear in the movie.
Speaker 9: How were they allowed to put on a play in Auschwitz?
Speaker 8: I don't know, but it was done kind of quite hush-hush, all of it, except that when it was put on, suddenly some SS men appeared and they watched. And then when Arnold Behm put on that play, he he wanted something like a Wardville Wardville play, which I was into. That was when I couldn't stand the breath of the guy who was playing with me.
Speaker 7: The building just left entering Auschwitz was actually a brothel used by the internees of the camp. Hospitals and camp dental facilities attended by camp inmates, dentists and nurses to deal with the inmates dental problems. The Auschwitz Camp had sick bays and hospitals where thousands of inmates were cured. The camp authorities foremost the garrison physician doctor Wirths tried all imaginable ways to keep the Auschwitz inmates alive, strong and healthy. The Holocaust
Speaker 0: is
@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne
Here's David Irving again, this time he discusses Hitler’s apprehension against using nerve gas on Allied soldiers This is unique because it apparently shows Hitler had a double standard for using nerve gas in the camps... https://t.co/uS94qkuQSv
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hitler embargoed the use of poison gas, as evidenced by a document signed by him, references in the German high command vows, verbatim references by him, and shorthand records of meetings.
If Churchill had used poison gas on German cities, the Germans would have won the war because they possessed nerve gases like sarin and tabun. In 1944, Germany had stockpiles of 30,000 tons of these nerve gases. Had Hitler used them in Normandy, it would have ended the Allied bridgehead because Allied gas masks were ineffective against German nerve gases.
Hitler, despite being able to gain a strategic advantage by using nerve gas, did not because he signed the Geneva Gas Protocol, which forbade him from using gas first.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And embargoed anywhere the use of poison gas. It's it's there. The actual document signed by Hitler, the references in the vows of the German high command, the verbatim references by him and the shorthand records of his meetings, the shorthand records of meetings in the German air ministry. The Fuhrer has absolutely forbidden the use of poison gas. The enemy is to use it first, and then we will retaliate with ours.
The reason being, the reason that makes this yardstick so extraordinary is that if Churchill had done what he was threatening and dropped the poison gas on German cities, the Germans would have won the war because the Germans had not just poison gases like mustard, the Germans had nerve gases. At this time, in 1944, they already had stockpiles of 30,000 tons of nerve gases, sarin and tabun, the famous nerve is being used even now by the Russians in Afghanistan and in Iraq and in Angola and elsewhere where the Russian troops are fighting. The nerve gases sarin and tabun, Hitler already had stockpiles of 30,000 tons, and nobody found out till the war was over, which is just as well because if Hitler had ever used it in Normandy, fighting the Allied, the American, the French, the British troops in Normandy, the Canadians as well, it would have been the end of the bridgehead because we didn't have a gas mask. We had no gas mask which would have stopped the German nerve gases. It would have been the end of the bridgehead.
And isn't it strange that Adolf Hitler, the devil incarnate, had the means whereby he could have secured an immediate strategic advantage, which would have turned the war because he would have pulled the nine or 10 panzer divisions out of Normandy and sent them to the Russian front. And with those high grade divisions, he would have wiped the floor with the Russians and ended the war by Christmas nineteen forty four. But he had put his name on a piece of paper, the Geneva Gas Protocol, saying that he would never use gas first because it would be a war crime.
@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne
Ok, we're almost done... This next clip discusses the propaganda after WWII, the rising and falling Auschwitz death tolls, and the history of the 6 million number But most importantly: It shows the tactics of violence and intimidation used against Holocaust "Deniers" https://t.co/UYbRl3kmQZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
During World War II, the Soviet Union was a military ally whose anti-Nazi propaganda was accepted and later integrated into historical accounts.
One speaker states their belief that 6,000,000 Jews were killed in the war by Adolf Hitler and the Nazis. They then ask another speaker, the president of Iran and a scholar, if he believes that 6,000,000 Jews were killed by the Nazis, or if he thinks that is not true.
The other speaker says he doesn't think 6,000,000 Jews were gassed, and cautions that this statement is against the law in Germany, and could result in imprisonment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think it's necessary to put this matter in its proper historical perspective. You see, we live in a time now when the old Soviet Union has fallen apart, and it's now okay for both liberals and conservatives as well as everybody else to speak ill of the departed communist state. But it was not always that way. During World War two, the Soviets were more than just a military ally. Their anti Nazi propaganda was readily accepted by the other allies because it served all of their purposes.
The point is that as the victors, the Soviets got to commit their propaganda to the history books as fact. With the 2020 hindsight we now have, the knowledge of Stalin's despotism, and the KGB's history of misinformation and deception, as well as the other camps in Poland, Majdanek, Belzec, Kelno, Treblinka, and Sobibor, we've had to rely on the Soviets for most of our information.
Speaker 1: I believe in the inarguable fact that 6,000,000 Jews were killed in the war by Adolf Hitler and Nazis. I'm merely asking you, as a president of Iran and as a scholar, do you believe that 6,000,000 Jews were killed by the Nazis, or do you think that is not true?
Speaker 2: But I don't think 6,000,000 Jews were gassed. Now be careful. I I beg of you. This is against the law in Germany. If there was a German somebody that's in German state, you could have me thrown into prison before I leave Germany.
I hope that's not your intention.
@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne
And last but not least, let's take look at how the Holocaust narrative is still used to this day and why it's so important that it not be questioned: https://t.co/zDl7ZXvIQu
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript claims there was no gas chamber in Dachau or other German concentration camps. It alleges that Holocaust revisionists are punished for challenging the "official" Holocaust narrative, citing examples like Robert Farison, Jurgen Groff, and Horst Mahler.
The speaker states that the Holocaust narrative is used to manipulate white Europeans with guilt, strengthen Jewish identity, promote globalism and multiculturalism, and delegitimize white European identity. They claim critics of Jewish people or Israel are outlawed.
The transcript asserts that Jewish and Zionist organizations censor the internet and suppress information that contradicts the accepted Holocaust narrative, alleging that Wikipedia and Google are monitored to fit a "politically correct" narrative. It also claims that "third world invaders" receive lenient sentences for crimes against Europeans, while Holocaust deniers face severe penalties. The speaker concludes that Holocaust denial laws are a gross infringement on freedom of expression and that such laws exist to protect a lie.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Stephen F. Pinter, who served as a lawyer for the United States War Department in the occupation forces in Germany and Austria for six years after the war, made the following statement: I was in DACA for seventeen months after the war as a US department attorney and can state that there was no gas chamber in Dachau, nor was there a gas chamber at any of the other concentration camps in Germany.
Speaker 1: I challenge your history again. There is absolutely no record that 6,000,000 people were put in concentration camps. They only have 16,000,000 to begin with.
Speaker 2: But in spite of Jewish opposition to historical integrity, Holocaust revisionists are breaking the bars erected around their imprisonment of conscience and speaking out. Robert Farison, for instance, a recognized French specialist in document analysis, has stated that no document has been found that proves that a plan for Jewish extermination by the third Reich was ever contemplated. Expulsion, yes, but extermination, no. As punishment for challenging the official holocaust line, Forrestin has been repeatedly the victim of physical assault, countless legal actions, freezings of his bank account, and heavy fines. In the year February, Swiss scholar Jurgen Groff, author of the book The Holocaust Swindle, after receiving a two year jail sentence for allegedly questioning the existence of gas chambers in Auschwitz, fled to Saint Petersburg where he's been living ever since as an exile.
There in Saint Petersburg, Groff is engaged in examining Soviet archives which Groff claims when allowed for release will bring Jewry's official version of the holocaust to its knees. Particularly scandalous and a blow to free speech and historical inquiry is the arrest of German lawyer Horst Mahler. In 02/2009, Mahler was sentenced by two German courts to eleven years in prison total for opinion crimes. One of them being Mueller's assertion that the official version of the Holocaust is the greatest lie ever perpetrated in human history.
Speaker 0: The benefits of exegregating the Holocaust have been enormous to sinus Jews both financially and politically. The Holocaust is today used as a guilt weapon as many racial groups exploit the empathy that white Europeans are known to have in order to guilt trip them into a collective guilt by making whites feel shameful and guilty about their past.
Speaker 3: Give them the guilt, man.
Speaker 4: That's yeah. Absolutely.
Speaker 5: We need to
Speaker 4: play on that guilt.
Speaker 6: You always
Speaker 4: I bring up everything from the past. Fifty years.
Speaker 3: The
Speaker 0: left, communists, or Jews hear a person discussing anything related to immigration, demographics, or race realism, they immediately label that person as a neo Nazi, the next Hitler, or antisemitic. This is done to shut down the conversation and to make the person look like a hateful bigot.
Speaker 7: Really quite dangerous, racist, fascist rhetoric. People don't think that it's okay to be a fucking Nazi anymore. It's basically the same as quoting Hitler.
Speaker 3: There's a bunch of
Speaker 8: opportunistic hate mongering fascists trying to garner sympathy with garbage propaganda videos. I directly compared everyone who talked about cultural Marxists to the fascist literal Nazis who invented the term.
Speaker 5: Racism is especially sensitive against individuals who are murdered in the millions.
Speaker 9: Very racist and antisemitic things. This is kind of embarrassing, but this hits somewhat close to home since some of my family aligns with that way of thinking. They don't think that it happened. Just gonna erase all that history. Sounds like my grandpa or any other racist person.
Bliten the Jews. This is literally my grandpa.
Speaker 5: Of course, she doesn't even believe that the holocaust even fucking happened. Well, mean, he did kill, like, 6,000,000 fucking Jews. I mean, believe it or not, he also killed 6,000,000 fucking Jews. Listen, you fucking cow. Okay?
When you kill 6,000,000 Jews, it doesn't matter what you did in the past.
Speaker 6: Holocaust. Yeah. Yeah. We're gonna talk to Mercedes Carrera.
Speaker 3: The 6,000,000. Six million.
Speaker 6: When I was a punk rocker when I was a punk rocker, brother
Speaker 3: 6,000,000. You're never sick, but I don't know. It was it was 6,000,000.
Speaker 0: The Holocaust narrative is used to strengthen Jewish identity simultaneously as undermining, demonizing, and delegitimizing white European identity. It is used as a manipulative weapon weapon against all white Europeans. I have done my research. Shane. I have done my research.
Speaker 3: Shane. Shane. Shane. Shane.
Speaker 5: Shane.
Speaker 10: Now, you owe me some money. Okay? You owe me reparations. Why is that?
Speaker 8: Because every freedom that I have and have taken for granted for my entire life has been made possible by wealth that my ancestors stole.
Speaker 0: The Holocaust narrative is primarily used to discourage policies such as nationalism and instead promote globalism and multiculturalism in the Western world. Europeans are constantly reminded of never forget, never again and that the horrors will never be repeated. This is done to brainwash the Europeans to not stand up for their own nation and race. Through this narrative, the Europeans support the politics that protect the rights of minority groups instead of their own people. Any criticism against the Jews or the Jewish State of Israel had practically been outlawed.
The Jewish Holocaust turning to a religion in which no deviation from the orthodoxy is acceptable. Even if there have been many holocausts and greater genocides throughout history, the Jewish holocaust is the only one that counts and it is of course the only one of whose orthodoxy is criminalized to even question. In fact, it is the only historical event that is prohibited by law to even question in many countries. The reason why you probably never even have heard about this research that have proven the official story to be false, is because researchers who have dared to explore the many inconsistencies and contradictions of the holocaust story have been subjected to physical attacks including harassment, vandalism, career destruction, drive by shootings, physical assaults and even firebombings of the warehouse that holds their work. Jewish and signist anti free speech organizations are doing everything they can to suppress the truth through censoring the Internet and burning the books that expose their lies.
Thanks to the pressure from anti free speech organizations, Facebook, YouTube and other social media are doing their best to repress and silence the truth and we cannot even rely on these platforms to be used in the future. Wikipedia and Google is both monitored to fit the politically correct narrative to mislead the population.
Speaker 6: Moet Zetiash in conjunction with My Israel has arranged instruction day for wiki editors. The goal of the day is to teach people how to edit in Wikipedia, which is the number one source of information today in the world. As a way of example, if someone searches the Gaza flotilla, we wanna be there. We wanna be the the guys who influence what is written there, how it's written, and to ensure that it's balanced and Zionist in nature.
Speaker 10: I came here to learn more about how we, as Israelis and as Jews, can defend Israel online on the Internet, and particularly in Wikipedia in this case. Wikipedia is a bit of a complex system, it's sometimes hard to figure out the rules. I personally tried to edit things in Wikipedia that were against Israel. Knowledge is important for anyone who wants to be active in defending Israel on the Internet so that we can go and we can see the information and we can say this isn't quite right. It's showing one side of the story, and I can I have the the power and the right to change that?
And in general, it's so important for us to be online working to defend our ourselves and to prove to to the world and to ourselves that we are just and we are right. And because right now, if you look online, if you do searches for certain terms related to Israel, you just it's just filled with antisemitism, anti Zionism, and garbage. And there's not enough of us out there working to counteract that and make sure that the other side of the story, our side of the story, and our right side of the story is getting the right coverage and the coverage that it needs, so
Speaker 0: In our supposedly free and democratic countries that frequently pride themselves of being tolerant, third world invaders are now raping European women and receive the most lenient sentence. Meanwhile, Holocaust deniers or anti Semites can get many years in prison for merely questioning a historical event. It is clear that our governments are not working for our people anymore. According to Gerhard Menonin, there were 117,344 accusations of thought crimes in the German courts in the year nineteen ninety four-two thousand and four. Around 2,000 people are put on trial every year for holocaust denial, which can give up to five years in prison and a fine.
Speaker 3: Most of the people in England, America, Australia have no idea what a tyranny this country is.
Speaker 4: Hundreds, we have more than 2,000 process, more than 2,000 trials a year and that over more than ten years. So you can imagine how many people have suffered from it and families have been destroyed and they lost their job and so on and so on. That says the truth. And simply for inquiring, simply for inquiring into the sources for They are not promoting any ideas, they are simply asking questions like you do. Yes, and now what happened in Paris is just for us because all the heads of the nation said press free and meaning freedom is the greatest thing for democracy.
And therefore I say I use this freedom.
Speaker 0: The Holocaust is a story that the globalists don't allow to even be debated or questioned. Anyone who questions the story immediately is branded as a racist, a Nazi who wants to kill 6,000,000 Jews and a Holocaust denier, hater or anti Semite. This labeling technique is used to discourage discourse in discussions related to Holocaust and World War two. Holocaust revisionism is today considered a taboo matter, with laws and prison sentences applied to Europeans who questions the politically correct Holocaust narrative. This is a gross infringement on Article 19 in the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights.
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression. This right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. The mere fact that Holocaust denial laws in Europe exist should raise an eyebrow. Truth does not fear investigation. You certainly do not need to make up laws to protect history unless you are trying to protect a lie.
The truth stands on its own legs.
@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne
A final note: As you can see, Holocaust Revisionism doesn't "deny" the Holocaust It believes many of the events that constitute what we collectively know as "The Holocaust" did take place But it also understands, we need to be able to have an honest discussion about historical events, especially when those events are used to this day to exemplify the evils of White collectivism and to solicit reparations for those evils Holocaust Revisionism merely seeks to have an honest and open discussion about the events of the Holocaust and firmly believes this statement to be true: The truth fears no investigation
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared my perspective on the Holocaust, arguing that it is a fabricated narrative. I pointed out that the Red Cross documented 271,000 deaths in camps, and there were no orders from Hitler for a "final solution." I mentioned that evidence like the absence of Zyklon B residue at Auschwitz and discrepancies in survivor accounts raise questions. I also noted that many deaths were due to starvation and disease, not extermination. I believe the portrayal of the Holocaust is largely influenced by propaganda and that questioning it leads to severe consequences.
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
Why the Holocaust is a Lie. -the Red Cross kept detailed records of all the deaths in the concentration camps. (271k) -the allies broke the codes to the SS communications, and never heard anything about a Holocaust -there is no order from Hitler for a “final solution.” -Goebbels wrote in his diary that the end goal was to deport the Jews to Madagascar -American executive expert Fred Leucther scraped the bricks of the Auschwitz gas chamber and found no Zyklon B residue. -Paul Rassinier, a French communist, was in a concentration camp alongside Jews, and wrote about his experience being completely different. -it was physically impossible to gas and cremate 6 million Jews in the time it was reported. -the “death camps” were all found on the Soviet side after the war. How did Hitler know where the iron curtain would be? -using Jewish sources, the worldwide Jewish population numbers did not decrease -Rudolf Hoss who “admitted” to the 6 million extermination death, was tortured at Nuremberg - many Jews and other inmates did die, as you see from some of the allies pictures, but it was a combination of starvation and Typhus, which was rampant at the end of the war. -there is no evidence of mass graves or mountains of Ash that would have existed from a mass killing operation -the highest Inmate number tattooed on a Holocaust survivor is 135,913 -Jewish producers in Hollywood create fictional Holocaust stories year in and year out to keep you in your psychological prison. Even Schindler’s list is mostly fiction based on a book called “Schindlers Ark. -the Germans were fighting and losing a 2 front war. Killing their own labor force in the most complex way imaginable would never have even entered their minds, nor was it possible with fuel, gas etc. -the door leading into the “Auschwitz gas chamber” is a wooden door. Legitimately physically impossible to run an execution gas chamber with one of them. -the “gas chamber lie” was war propaganda created by the British initially in their psychological war department. It is written in their archives. -when a German questions the Holocaust, he goes to prison, when a Jew says he’s a victim of the Holocaust, he gets a reparations check.
@BrunellaCapitan - Brunella C.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In June 1915, before Hitler's rise, a mention of 6,000,000 Jews appears.
The New York Times, in October 1918, references a $1,000,000,000 fund for Jewish people, stating 6,000,000 souls would need help after the war. In September 1919, the New York Times reported on Ukrainian Jews aiming to stop problems, noting 127,000 Jews killed and 6,000,000 on parole.
A November 1919 New York Times article cites unbelievable poverty, starvation, and disease affecting about 6,000,000 souls, half the Jewish population. February 1920 mentions 6,000,000 Jews. In May 1920, a fund was established for Jewish Warsaw and Central/Eastern Europe, where six million faced famine, disease, and death.
Twelve years before Hitler, a July 1921 New York Times article mentions 6,000,000 Jews facing extermination by massacre. The Gazette in Montreal, December 1931, highlights 6,000,000 starving Jews.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Soon. New York, Sunday, June 1915. This is eighteen year before Hitler ever set foot in the government. He was due. 6,000,000 Jews.
The New York Times, 10/18/1918, the articles called $1,000,000,000 fund to be billed a Jewie. There it is. 6,000,000,000 souls will need help to resume normal life when war has ended. The New York Times, September 1919. And the article is called the Ukrainian Jews aim to stop problems.
Mass meet with Yaz, and a 127,000 Jews have been killed and 6,000,000 on parole in the New York Times, November 1919, and it reduced to travesty, unbelievable poverty, starvation, and disease. About 6,000,000 souls were half the Jewish population of the earth. 02/23/1920. 6,000,000 Jews. Friday, May 1920.
The fund for Jewish Warsaw Frosk in Central And Eastern Europe where six millions face horrifying conditions of famine, disease, and death. New York Times, Wednesday, July 1921, twelve year before Adolf Hitler ever set for an agreement for the that, which has 6,000,000 Jews are facing extermination by massacre. Gazette, Montreal, 12/29/1931. And the article pretty much speaks up for itself. 6,000,000 Jews, they are starving.
@BrunellaCapitan - Brunella C.
246 Newspaper Articles about 6,000,000 Jews from 1900–1945 | Minds
1900 — Stephen S. Wise, New York Times, June 11, 1900“There are 6,000,000 living, bleeding, suffering arguments in favor of Zionism.”1902 — ...
minds.com
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
You mean the allies never found 1 single “death camp” it was only reported on the side of the jewish communist Bolsheviks???? That’s weird. https://t.co/M8wkK0QtYG
@WarsawErik - Erik Warsaw
🌐 WW2 Concentration Camps Truth does not fear investigation Listen to both sides of evidence and you decide Gas Chambers 6 million Swimming pools Soccer teams https://t.co/6eMln1b9Xq
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions the claim that six million Jews perished in German concentration camps during World War II. They cite gas chamber doors that allegedly didn't lock, some made of wood with glass windows, arguing they weren't airtight and would have harmed the guards.
They mention Fred Lukter's analysis of Auschwitz gas chamber walls, which supposedly found no cyanide residue. The speaker highlights the existence of soccer teams, a theater, sewing rooms, and swimming pools in the camps, questioning why these would exist if extermination was the goal.
A 1944 International Red Cross report allegedly found no evidence of extermination installations at Auschwitz. The speaker claims Jewish population records before and after the war show no significant change. They state that autopsies on 270,000 bodies found the cause of death was typhus and starvation, not poison gas.
They allege some cremation smokestacks had no soot and one chimney wasn't connected to the building. The speaker concludes that evidence was manipulated for propaganda and that questioning the Holocaust is taboo because the narrative falls apart under scrutiny.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did six million j really perished in World War two German concentration camps, or is that number just a little bit exaggerated? Let's look at the evidence. And let's start with gas chamber doors that did not lock.
Speaker 1: Here we see the door to the Mauthausen gas chamber. It does not lock. It doesn't lock. The latches can be opened from the inside or the outside as I am showing right here. You cannot lock somebody into this room.
You cannot lock somebody out.
Speaker 0: They couldn't lock them in, and some gas chamber doors were made with wooden doors. Wooden doors to gas chambers? Come on. And look at those gas chamber windows. Cheap thin glass windows on wooden frames to a gas chamber?
Really? Come on. No one pushed that out to save their own lives? Look closely at all the gas chambers with wooden walls and glass windows too. It's not airtight.
If they poured lots of poison gas inside it, it would also wipe out anyone standing outside, including all the German guards. Also, chemical analysis on all the walls of the gas chambers showed that no poison ever existed in them.
Speaker 2: In the nineteen eighties, American expert Fred Lukter, who builds gas chambers for American penal systems, took scrapings from the walls of the Auschwitz gas chamber for chemical analysis. He found no cyanide residue at all. The Auschwitz exhibit is a fake, pure and simple.
Speaker 0: Now let's go into the soccer teams, the theater, and the sewing rooms that existed in the camps. All this is real footage during the war, not to mention the swimming pools. Why would they have soccer and swimming pools to people they're about to exterminate? And those swimming pools still exist to this day. Here they are.
Speaker 3: Finally, we have the Auschwitz Swimming Pool. Yes. That's right. Swimming pool. A beautiful pool with a diving board and starters blocks for races.
To their credit, the Auschwitz camp officials have not tried to remove this distraction. But if you wanna see the pool, you need to know already that it exists because you won't find it on the tour.
Speaker 0: The impartial international Red Cross was allowed to inspect the camps during wartime to make sure that all prisoners were being treated well. Here's a report by the November 1944, only months before liberation at Camp Auschwitz. The report states no traces of installations of exterminating civilians, period. Also, old records of the Jewish population, before World War two, about 15,700,000. After World War two, about 15,700,000 again.
So where is the 6,000,000 missing number? Real numbers of the 270,000 bodies that were found. All were documented and they did autopsy reports on every single one of them. Conclusion, not a single person died of poison gas. Most common cause of death, typhus and starvation.
When the Germans were losing, they ran away and abandoned the camps, had them locked without any food. It's sad. Many people passed away, but it was not six million. And of the 270,000, half of them weren't even jays. They said they hid the bodies by cremating them, but some of the cremation smokestacks didn't even have any soot in them.
How was that even possible? And one chimney is not even connected to the building. A lot of these things on display were created and built after World War two, manipulated evidence for propaganda and creating a false sense of sympathy. There is a reason why it is illegal to question the h cost or make it extremely taboo. Because as soon as you start scratching the surface and asking questions, the whole thing falls apart way too easily.
Truth does not fear investigation. So go ahead and listen to evidence on both sides, and you make your own decision.
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
“Final Solution” document from Hitler to exterminate all the Jews?…. doesn’t exist. Documents of SS discussions on how to reduce the death rate in the camps…. Readily available. 🤔 https://t.co/w7I6c1t3dz
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the official narrative surrounding the Holocaust is fundamentally flawed, lacking credible evidence and scientific support. Historical claims, such as the repeated figure of 6 million Jewish deaths, seem inconsistent and symbolic rather than factual. Many testimonies from the Nuremberg trials were coerced under duress, and inspections revealed no evidence of gas chambers. Documentation and statistics suggest that deaths were primarily due to disease and starvation, not execution. Moreover, translations of key speeches may have been misinterpreted, further complicating the narrative.
@Miserei_ - Miserei
There is a 0 % probability that the official narrative on the holocaust is remotely close to being accurate. It fails in math, forensics, science and the documentation is either fake or missing. Long thread 🧵
@Miserei_ - Miserei
The term 6 million Jews is repeated in over 200 articles leading up to WW2. One article even claims that 6 million Jews had already been murdered 7 months prior to WW2. https://www.torahtothetribes.com/teaching/the-hebraic-book-of-revelation-part-2c/
The Hebraic Book of Revelation - Part 2C - Torah to the Tribes
6,000,000 has its origins in an ancient Babylonian sorcerers prophecy straight out of the pages of Torah. Lev 25:10 And ye shall hallow the fiftieth year, and proclaim liberty throughout all the land unto all the inhabitants thereof: it shall be a jubilee unto you; and ye shall return every man unto his possession, and ye shall return every man unto his family. תשבו ‘Ye shall return’ = ‘TaShuVU’ - תשבו Tav-Shin-Vet-Vav and it seems to be spelled incorrectly…it’s missing another ו Vav and should be spelt תשובו Tav-Shin-Vav-Vet-Vav תשובו 6,000,000 is the mystical and magical conjure number associated with ushering in the Balaam oracles of return to the land of Israel. The magic: the letter ו Vav is missing;ו Vav = 6. conjure up the vanishing ו Vav and the spell will be set. The return will only happen upon the manufacture of the missing ו Vav. The missing ו Vav is what enables the return to happen
torahtothetribes.com
@Miserei_ - Miserei
Up until 1989, the number of deaths at Auschwitz was over 4 million. Then it was reduced to 1.1 million. Majdanek also reduced its death count by nearly 2 million. Somehow the 6 million number did not change which shows that it is symbolic and not at all accurate.
@Miserei_ - Miserei
Although the executions by gas chambers were mentioned in the Nuremberg trials among other outlandish claims, the general public weren’t made aware of its use for executions until the late 1960s.
@Miserei_ - Miserei
Before the late 1960s, we were told that Jews were turned into lampshades and soap which ended up being complete nonsense.
@Miserei_ - Miserei
The NS officers that testified at the Nuremberg trials were tortured into confessions. This makes their testimonies meaningless as people will say anything under torture.
@Miserei_ - Miserei
After judge Edward Van Roden allowed his words to be printed in a press article, he then had to backtrack after receiving too much pressure. He later claimed that some German captives had been kicked in the testicles but that he did not know how many.
@Miserei_ - Miserei
After conducting an inspection, the western military police found no evidence of homicidal gas chambers.
@Miserei_ - Miserei
The Soviets had orders to fabricate German atrocities in order to stir up hatred. They also refused to allow inspectors into the alleged death camps.
@Miserei_ - Miserei
After forensic tests failed to prove that hydrogen cyanide gas was ever used in the homicidal gas chambers, we were then told that the gas chambers were reconstructions done after the war by the same Soviets who had orders to fabricate German atrocities.
@Miserei_ - Miserei
The propaganda went as far as producing doctored photos to make the Germans look as evil as possible.
@Miserei_ - Miserei
The narrative keeps changing as new evidence emerges. They used to say that 1944 was the height of the genocide in Auschwitz. Aerial photographs proved this to be false. No piles of coke for the crematories, no smoking chimneys, and no line ups of people.
@Miserei_ - Miserei
The official narrative stands and falls on the eye witness testimonies of around 20 people. Some of whom often times directly contradict one another.
@Miserei_ - Miserei
You can’t have a crematorium adjacent to a non hermetically sealed gas chamber. You wouldn’t be able to run the place for more than 20 minutes before it exploded, let alone running it 24/7 for 3 years straight. https://www.unz.com/pub/jhr__the-leuchter-report-vindicated/
@Miserei_ - Miserei
The doors of the gas chambers in Auschwitz aren’t even realistic. If millions of people were killed with hydrogen cyanide, there should’ve been countless eye witness testimonies claiming to have seen cadavers with red skin, and yet there is little to none of those claims.
@Miserei_ - Miserei
Multiple ground penetrating radar tests failed to show evidence of mass graves in Treblinka, but new experts were brought in and claimed to have found evidence of mass graves. Shortly after the ground on site was paved with boulders and concrete so no further tests could be made.
@Miserei_ - Miserei
The vast majority of deaths in concentration camps were from Typhus and starvation near the end of the war when the Allies destroyed the supply lines. In comparison, a small fraction of these deaths were from shooting and hanging.
@Miserei_ - Miserei
The Red Cross and the Soviet documents show that total death count of all concentration camps to be between 200 000 and 300 000.
@Miserei_ - Miserei
There are no documents in the German and British archives that talks about killing people with gas. https://odysee.com/@Zefrenchman:3/e5eae64447f995cb.mp4-(480p):d
David Irving
View on Odysee: David Irving
odysee.com
@Miserei_ - Miserei
There’s been many attempts to fake NS documents but the archivists used to spot them quickly. Here we have a classic example of a fake document where the style of writing and the ink is different than usual NS documents. The numbers on the file are mathematically impossible. https://t.co/yjMzYAa3pE
@Miserei_ - Miserei
This is a genuine document demanding that everything be done to reduce the death rates in concentration camps. https://t.co/ubdiWRClRe
@Miserei_ - Miserei
The Jewish population had not decreased in the official statistics during the late 1940s. https://t.co/SZFCEl4mfF
@Miserei_ - Miserei
When the Red Cross inspected German concentration camps it was reported that the prisoners were receiving 3 meals a day and were living in descent conditions overall. https://t.co/PK5Xm72caT
@Miserei_ - Miserei
Testimonies of people admitting there were no gas chambers. https://t.co/AEPwaaulX1 https://t.co/9kwXqW1hUC
@Miserei_ - Miserei
The speeches and texts are often times mistranslated. Here we have a speech from Himmler calling for the extermination of Jews. But in reality, he is calling for the uprooting of Jews. The word Ausrottung has various meanings depending on the phrase that comes first. https://t.co/zlbwgFXAuL
@Miserei_ - Miserei
Ausrottung can be translated into, eradication, extermination, stamping out or uprooting. When looking at the phrase (the evacuation of the Jews), the correct translation should be uprooting instead of exterminating.
@Miserei_ - Miserei
Let’s say the genocide by gas chambers is true. The math simply doesn’t work. Up until 1943, there was one crematorium with 6 muffles operating in Auschwitz from 1941 to 1943.
@Miserei_ - Miserei
Then 4 crematorium with 46 muffles were added from 1943 to 1944 before the camp was turned into an air raid shelter. It takes an average 2 to 4 hours to cremate a body. That’s roughly 8 bodies cremated per muffle every 24 hours.
@Miserei_ - Miserei
The cremation capacity in the first 2 years would be around 17 000 bodies and in the short year of 1943 to 1944. 150 000 bodies could have been cremated if crematorium operated 24/7. This gives us roughly 170 000 in total. Far from the 1.1 million in the official narrative.
reSee.it AI Summary
I explore the topic of Holocaust Revisionism, questioning commonly accepted narratives and highlighting claims made by revisionists. I present perspectives from individuals like David Cole and David Irving, who raise doubts about the evidence for gas chambers and the methods of obtaining confessions. I discuss inconsistencies in survivor stories and the portrayal of camp life, which included amenities like theaters and sports. Ultimately, I argue for the importance of open dialogue about historical events, asserting that the truth can withstand scrutiny.
@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne
🧵People claim October 7th was worse than the Holocaust So just how bad was the Holocaust? Let's find out from the perspective of the Holocaust Revisionists (aka Holocaust "Deniers") These are all facts they didn't teach you about the Holocaust in grade school...
@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne
First, here’s a jewish man named David Cole on the inconsistencies of the gas chambers (ie. wooden doors and other illogical constructions) David is surprised “how little evidence there is" for many of the events https://t.co/VCoEXDOd2L
Video Transcript AI Summary
Proofs of the Holocaust are few: 'Literally, all there is are the eyewitness testimonies and postwar confessions. There's no picture, plan, or wartime document dealing with homicidal gas chambers or a plan to exterminate the Jews.' After intercepting transmissions from Auschwitz, the speaker argues that the evidence has normal explanations: hair, shoes, and clothing reflect lice control and issued uniforms; Zyklon B was used to disinfect clothes and buildings; the typhus epidemic demanded strict lice control. Allied aerial photos of Auschwitz 'do not show people being gassed or bodies being burned.' He describes a building with four holes in the ceiling; revisionists say they were added later. 1988 Fred Lucher tests showed gas-chamber samples with 'almost no appreciable traces,' Krakow 1990 tests 'got back the same results.' The conclusion: 'there are no eyewitnesses because there were no gassings.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know from years of my own research and the research of others that proofs of the holocaust are few. Literally, all there is are the eyewitness testimonies and postwar confessions. There's no picture, plan, or wartime document dealing with homicidal gas chambers or a plan to exterminate the Jews. And we can't use the excuse that the Nazis destroyed all the evidence because after we had broken the German code, we were able to intercept their secret transmissions, including those that came from Auschwitz. The key to understanding the Holocaust story is understanding the true nature of the things passed off as proofs.
Everything that is used as evidence of the Holocaust also can be said to have a perfectly normal explanation. For example, these exhibits are said to be the material proofs of exterminations. There's the piles of human hair. But what does that prove? It's acknowledged that each inmate had his or her head shaved because of the lice problem.
That's not denied. So why wouldn't there be piles of human hair? What about the piles of shoes and clothing? Is that a proof? It's a fact that the prisoners were issued a uniform upon arrival, including shoes.
So why wouldn't there be piles of inmates' shoes and clothing? It doesn't prove anybody was killed. What about the canisters of gas? No one denies that Zyklon B was used to disinfect clothes and also buildings. Buildings.
Zyklon B was one of the premier pest control agents in Europe at that time. It was present in most of the concentration camps, including those that are not said to have had homicidal gas chambers in them. The typhus epidemic that spread throughout Europe during the war and also spread through the camps called for stringent lice control procedures. So what other proofs are offered? Well, there's the usual pictures of sick inmates, which proves the groundbreaking thesis that people got sick in the camp.
Once again, I'll add that nobody denies the typhus epidemic, which resulted in many deaths. Then there's the artwork and the pictures of children. But at this point, it's looking pretty bad for somebody looking for objective proofs of the gas chamber. And some of the proofs they present actually work against the concept. For example, they have one of several aerial photographs taken of Auschwitz by the Allies during the war.
They don't mention, however, that when blown up, these photos don't show people being gassed or bodies being burned even though they were taken during the time killings were said to be going on almost nonstop. Once inside, we can see why revisionists have had such a field day with this building. Obvious marks on the walls and floors where apparently walls had been knocked down, equally obvious holes in the floor where bathroom facilities had been. We maintain that unlike the large hollow chamber we now see. This room had once been five rooms, including a bathroom.
Yet the building does have what appears to be evidence of criminal usage, four holes in the ceiling, which lead to the roof where four little chimneys stand. It is said that through these four holes, cyclone B crystals were dropped. And indeed, there seems to be no other explanation for them. Do these holes prove homicidal gassings? Revisionists have claimed in the past that these holes were added after the camp's liberation and that the inside walls were knocked down and the bathroom facilities removed to make the room look like a big gas chamber.
Let's start again talking about this building here.
Speaker 1: Notorium gas chamber.
Speaker 0: But this is a reconstruction.
Speaker 1: It is in original state.
Speaker 0: Original?
Speaker 1: Original state. It is in original part. Original. It is original. Original in through this chimney was from cyclone beam.
Speaker 0: Are those the original holes in
Speaker 1: the ceiling?
Speaker 0: They've been rebuilt? Yes. Okay. After the war? After the war.
Yes. This is Auschwitz Birkenau in an allied aerial photo from September 1944. The train that would come up carrying the doomed inmates, you would have thousands of inmates being marched off the trains into one of these two gas chambers in full view of the entire camp. This was a spectacle that nobody at the camp could miss. They would see thousands of people marching into those buildings and nobody coming out.
These were gas chambers that were not isolated from anyone. And indeed, when these aerial photographs were released in the late seventies, they contradicted many supposed eyewitness claims about how the Nazis had tried to camouflage the gas chambers at Birkenau. Another question that should be asked, is there any Zyklon b residue in the gas chamber knowing that cyanide gas would, in fact, leave a residue? In 1988, execution equipment expert Fred Lucher conducted forensic examinations on the gas chambers at Auschwitz to answer that question. He took samples from the four gas chambers at Birkenau, the one at the main camp, and the control sample from one of the disinfestation chambers that we know did use Zyklon B.
Now the gas chamber samples showed almost no appreciable traces, whereas the disinfestation sample literally went right off the scale. In 1990, the Institute of Forensic Research in Krakow decided to conduct their own forensic tests to see if they could refute Fred Lucher's findings, and their own tests got back the same results.
Speaker 2: With the exception of the video photographer, I brought the same things that I would have normally brought to a prison in The United States if I was doing a survey of their equipment. The draftsman was there to take and verify measurements. The drawings were made on-site and then reproduced when we returned to The United States to document everything we saw. I personally made photographs and produced a great deal of photographic evidence of the hardware and facilities that we found in Poland. And the video photographer, which was not a normal thing for me, was brought to document the fact that the forensic samples that I removed from the facilities, the control sample from the Lausing facility Number 1 of Birkenau, and all of the other samples from the alleged gas execution rooms were properly taken, packaged for and packaged for submission to the laboratories.
I examined the facilities, and I made a determination that they were incapable of supporting the use of hydrogen cyanide gas for purposes of execution or otherwise. But additionally, it would be necessary to move remove samples, return them to The United States for testing at an independent laboratory to, in fact, confirm what my visual inspection indicated, that these facilities never, in fact, contained hydrogen cyanide gas.
Speaker 3: What aside from the samples convinced you that these facilities could not have been used then or now as execution facilities?
Speaker 2: The samples in my mind were mainly corroborative. The reasons that I determined that these facilities were not or never could have been gas execution facilities are stated in my report. And it does it mainly is concerned with the design fabrication of these facilities, the requirements necessary in the design of a facility that contains a highly explosive and highly poisonous gas. You must have gasketed doors, no windows, means of getting the gas in, means of getting the gas out, something for heating the gas and the air to constantly keep the right temperature, explosion proof switches, lighting facilities, etc. None of these ever existed.
We are talking about brick and mortar buildings without heat, with non explosion proof lighting, without gasketed doors, in some cases without doors at all, and with crematories that opened very close or adjacent to the facility. If these facilities were used for gas execution facilities, if those persons operating the facilities didn't gas themselves to death at the same time that the executees died, they certainly would have been blown to bits when the gas exploded from a spark arc in a switch, the heat of a light bulb, or the gas approaching and getting into the crematory furnace. I mean, it's just ludicrous to consider that these facilities could have been used as gas chambers.
Speaker 3: Well, we all know from reading the newspapers and watching TV that there's many holocaust survivors who say that they actually saw gassings. They describe them in minute detail, which relative it was they lost, down to the color of the corpses and the color of the smoke coming out of the chimney. How do you respond to these people? Well, one of the things
Speaker 2: that was necessary for me to do, Kirk, at the outset, so I'd have an understanding of what I was doing was read the literature and alleged eyewitness reports so I could make a determination of the protocol, which that's a fancy word that we use in terms of executions for determining, for what the actual procedure is for the execution. And I found through these investigations that there was no such a thing as an eyewitness. I have never seen a report that was written by anyone who had a valid description of what could have happened at a gassing. So the long and the short of it is there are no eyewitnesses because there were no gassings.
@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne
Next, let's take a look at how German confessions were obtained through torture, the infamous human lampshade and soap claims, and one of the more interesting Holocaust facts: No document has ever been found showing Hitler ordered any systematic mass exterminations
Video Transcript AI Summary
Cyclone b dropped into the death chamber from a small opening. It took from three to fifteen minutes. We knew when the people were dead because their screaming stopped. After the bodies were removed, our special commandos took off the rings and extracted the gold from the teeth of the corpses. Children of tender years were invariably exterminated since by reason of their youth, they were unable to work.
It was the British who obtained by torture the confession of Rudolf Herr's commandant of Auschwitz before turning him over to the Soviets and Poles.
This has been confirmed in a book published in 1983 titled Legions of Death, which contains the recollections of British Sergeant Bernard Clark, who brags about having tortured Hearst get a confession out of him and of threatening his family.
I would rather die painless than have the sovereign subjected to such humiliation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Cyclone b dropped into the death chamber from a small opening. It took from three to fifteen minutes. We knew when the people were dead because their screaming stopped. After the bodies were removed, our special commandos took off the rings and extracted the gold from the teeth of the corpses. Children of tender years were invariably exterminated since by reason of their youth, they were unable to work.
Is that all true and correct, witness? Yes.
Speaker 1: It was the British who obtained by torture the confession of Rudolf Herr's commandant of Auschwitz before turning him over to the Soviets and Poles. This has been confirmed in a book published in 1983 titled Legions of Death, which contains the recollections of British Sergeant Bernard Clark, who brags about having tortured Hearst get a confession out of him and of threatening his family. It was here that Hearst was hanged.
Speaker 0: I rather wish the Fuhrer had stood by his followers and taken the responsibility for his command. Think of his position. Oh, sure. His position is chief war criminal. Right?
He was our sovereign. It would be intolerable for me to have him standing before a foreign court. You men knew the furor. He would be the first one to stand up and say, I gave the orders, and I shall take full responsibility. And I would rather die painless than have the sovereign subjected to such humiliation.
@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne
Now, let’s take a look at the evidence against the gas chambers and mass graves as well as some of the numeric anomalies of the Holocaust The first clip is Fred Leuchter who wrote an infamous report called The Leuchter Report that comprehensively examined Auschwitz https://t.co/DUcjnX6cts
Video Transcript AI Summary
- None of the facilities examined at Auschwitz, Birkenau, or Lublin could have supported or in fact did ever support multiple executions utilizing hydrogen cyanide, carbon monoxide, or any other allegedly or factually lethal gas.
- Based upon very generous maximum usage rates for all the alleged gas chambers totaling some 1,693 persons per week and assuming these facilities could support gas executions, it would have required sixty eight years to execute the alleged number of 6,000,000 presses.
- Promoting these facilities as being capable of affecting mass, multiple, or even singular executions is both ludicrous and insulting to every individual on this planet.
- Hydrocyonic Acid was not used in the buildings alleged to have been homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz.
- I have come to the conclusion that no one was willfully or purposefully killed with cyclone B in this manner. I consider it impossible.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: None of the facilities examined at Auschwitz, Birkenau, or Lublin could have supported or in fact did ever support multiple executions utilizing hydrogen cyanide, carbon monoxide, or any other allegedly or factually lethal gas. Based upon very generous maximum usage rates for all the alleged gas chambers totaling some 1,693 persons per week and assuming these facilities could support gas executions, it would have required sixty eight years to execute the alleged number of 6,000,000 presses. Promoting these facilities as being capable of affecting mass, multiple, or even singular executions is both ludicrous and insulting to every individual on this planet.
Speaker 1: Germa Rudolf is a chemist who knew '1 while working towards a doctorate in chemistry at the renowned Max Planck Institute for Solid State Physics in Stuttgart, began a scientific investigation of the credibility of the Leuchter Report. His detailed chemical analysis concluded that Hydrocyonic Acid was not used in the buildings alleged to have been homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz. His report strengthens the findings of Fred Leuchter. The prominent Austrian engineer, Walter Liftel, also made a report concluding that the homicidal gassings were impossible for technical reasons and because they are incompatible with observable laws on nature. Liftel's report is further authoritative confirmation of the findings of Fred Loister.
The American research chemist Doctor. William B. Lindsay also made careful examinations of the alleged gas chambers. After thirty three years of experience as a chemist, he declared and affirmed under oath, I have come to the conclusion that no one was willfully or purposefully killed with cyclone B in this manner. I consider it impossible.
The Krakow Forensic Institute, Robert Farison, Fredrik Turban, Jan Ball, Carlo Matano, Jurgen Graf, Anne Sundal, David Macaldon, and many others who also have carried out similar technical inspections of the alleged gas chambers have come to the same conclusion. A brave Jewish revisionist named David Cole made a groundbreaking documentary called Cole in Auschwitz in 1992. Today, are many future length documentaries, analyses and commentary on the German labor camps. In 1999, Ricker Creek, a qualified electronics engineer, and his team of researchers carried out a high-tech exam of the soil in the alleged death camp Treblinka. Using ground penetrating radar for three weeks, the team found that the ground was never even disturbed, and core samples revealed no ash.
The results obtained show with 100% certainty that mass graves never even existed in Triplinka or Belzec. There are, in fact, many mass graves in the East. However, this was where the Soviets massacred people. Today, it is well known that, for example, the Katy massacre was committed by the Soviets, but was blamed on the Germans after the war. Doctor Charles Larsen, one of Americans leading pathologists as part of a US war crimes investigation team, performed more than 1,000 autopsies of the dead bodies in the German camps, and none showed any evidence of death by poison gas.
If there had been gassings with carbon monoxide or cyanide, the indications would have been extremely dramatic and readily visible. The courses would have been bright sherry red. No Prussian blue cyanide staining was found on walls in the alleged death chambers. Only in the delousing chambers are ample amounts of evidence of gassings, where cyclone B was used on clothes and bedding to stop the spread of typhus. The Auschwitz Museum curator admitted that the Soviets created the homicidal gas chamber after the war by altering a German bomb shelter.
In the bomb shelter presented to us as a homicidal gas chamber in Auschwitz, the communists removed the walls and made the infamous cyclone b holes in the roof to make it look like a real gas chamber.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Now when you go into that Cream of One building, you're gonna see it. It just looks kinda weird. It has all these dirt mounds all around it. You know, really, it looks like a a bomb shelter, and that's exactly what it was at the end of the war.
It was a bomb shelter. They want you to think that 4,000,000 people went through Wash Woods, and they made it look like all the people went through that camp there. But that building there was not capable or made for gassing people, alright, at all. I mean, you know, you go inside it, they they they chop holes in the roof at the end, and it's just ridiculous. I mean, there's no way people were were killed in that building.
So they want you to believe that this is the building that people were gassed in. It just wasn't feasible that people were gassed in that building.
Speaker 3: The thing now, that building, where they end the tour, that was never a gas chamber. There was a chimney next to it and there were four holes in the ceiling where the Zyklon B granules would be dumped and people would see the holes and they could explore them and look around. What I did in 'ninety two, I interviewed the man who was the director, the curator, for lack of a better word, of of the camp. And he admitted to me on camera, not a hidden camera shoot. It was a open two camera shoot in his office.
It was me and my camera woman. And he admitted on camera that the building displayed as the gas chamber is not in its original state, that when the Soviets liberated the camp, that building was an air raid shelter, a very obvious, very clear air raid shelter. And then the Soviets remodeled it to look like what their conception of the gas chamber is. Now there's no backup evidence to prove that this building was ever a gas chamber. There's no Zyklon blue cyanide staining on the walls.
There were no four holes in the roof to dump in the Zyklon B. The Soviets added those. There there had been dividing walls. Inside the room, the Soviets knocked those down to make it look like one big open chamber. They ripped up the bathroom facilities.
You can still see the drains in the floor. You can still see the holes where the toilet and the sink had led into, but they took out all the facilities and they carved a doorway where there had not been a door to make it look like there was a progression from the gas chamber to the oven room. But there was a lot of stuff that they didn't bother to cover up. There's a gigantic manhole right in the middle of the gas
Speaker 2: chamber. Yeah.
Speaker 3: A manhole that any adult, even a fairly heavy set adult can go down into. Now what that is, that was an escape hatch, was fairly standard design procedure that underground or partially underground bomb shelters would have an escape hatch in case rubble or anything else prevented the people inside from exiting the bomb shelter through the main door. So you have this manhole that no one had noticed for at that point, Auschwitz, when I went there in '91, Auschwitz had been open to the the West for over a decade. No one ever noticed the damn manhole, and it's right there clear as day. The door to the chamber opens in.
In other words, if you if it was a gas chamber and you stuck people in there and they they would all pile up against the door trying to bang their way out, they would die there. In order to open the door again, you'd have to push against a mound of 50, a hundred, two hundred, 300 bodies. The, the door locks on the inside, not the outside. In other words, the the victims would be able to lock the Germans out, which which is just kind of a a silly thing to think of.
Speaker 1: In January 1995, the prestigious French weekly magazine, Le Express, acknowledged that everything about this gas chamber is false and that it is in fact a deceitful postwar reconstruction. French Jewish Olga Vorum Sarnikot wrote a book about the National Socialist concentration camps in which she stated Auschwitz, which was to remain the model camp and simultaneously the administrative center, had no gas chamber. A fake chimney was also built by the Soviets in 1947. It has no opening, and it is not even connected to the building. German prisoners were
Speaker 0: also
@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne
Next, David Irving discusses if there were sufficient amounts of combustibles for cremations, the Germans making no references to gas chambers in private or public documents, and the fact the gas chambers on the Auschwitz tour are “reconstructions” and not originals https://t.co/OLfFMIhZxm
Video Transcript AI Summary
He argues that calling the Auschwitz gas chamber a fake is wrong; "It is a reconstruction." If mister Irving doesn't know the difference between a reconstruction and a fake, then he shouldn't call himself a historian. "'A fake, like the bomb scare that's just been telephoned to this hotel,'" he says. He notes that for fifty years Auschwitz authorities have been showing a building to schoolchildren "telling them that is the gas chamber where the Nazis killed millions of Jews" and that, unless they label it, "what you are seeing is just a reconstruction on the basis of eyewitness testimony, then that is a fake." He questions cremation capacity: "how do you cremate 1,000,000 people in Auschwitz?" and cites "40 to 60 kilograms of coke" per person, totaling "40 to 60,000 tons of coke" unseen in photos. He argues archives were not destroyed; "no reference in the intercepted telegrams to anybody being gassed." The Auschwitz record
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: By academics around the world. He then goes on in his readers letter to say, it is also totally wrong to call that gas chamber a fake. It's a reconstruction. If mister Irving doesn't know the difference between a reconstruction and a fake, then he shouldn't call himself a historian. So said this reader's letter in the New Zealand Herald three days ago.
To which my to which my response is to which my response is, a fake, like the bomb scare that's just been telephoned to this hotel. That is a fake. If this mister Rubin was to offer me a reconstructed, a reconstruction of a $20 bill, I don't think I'd accept that. That is what I would call a fake. If for fifty years, the authorities in Auschwitz have been showing a building to busloads of shuddering school children from all over Europe, telling them that is the gas chamber where the Nazis killed millions of Jews.
And if they haven't had the honesty to write in big letters above the door, what you are seeing is just a reconstruction on the basis of eyewitness testimony, then that is a fake. They have concealed the fact that it's a reconstruction which makes it a fake. And I'm fined $22,000 for pointing this fact out because it's an embarrassment. Of course, it's an embarrassment. The embarrassment is, of course, why do they show the schoolchildren the fake building here when allegedly there were genuine gas chamber ruins just down the road three or four miles away?
Well, that's because people start asking questions. They say this is odd, ruins of a gas chamber, but I think according to maps I've seen this was the crematorium, not a gas chamber at all. Four crematorium in Auschwitz because they had immense typhus problems. They had epidemics with tens of thousands of the inmates dying, which is a crime. And anybody who says to me, David Irving says it wasn't a crime, what happened to the Jews in Auschwitz or elsewhere, is also doing me an injustice because there was undoubtedly a crime.
But we're arguing about scale. We're arguing about intent. We're arguing about the how how and the why and the wherefore. And this is what we are not allowed to do. This is what questions like, how do you cremate 1,000,000 people in Auschwitz?
If cremating one person takes 40 to 60 kilograms of coke, that means that to cremate 1,000,000 people is gonna take 40 to 60,000 tons of coke. And where are those 40 or 60,000 tons of coke? They are not visible on any of the aerial photographs, nor are there truckloads of coke being driven up, nor are there railway lines bringing in the wagon loads of coke. So that is, pre opacity by itself, improbable. And anyway, these four crematory, we know exactly what their handling capacity was, how many cadavers could be cremated at a time.
We know they couldn't have cremated more than tops seventy, eighty, 90,000 people in the four or five years that the camp was in existence. These are the technical questions that people ask. And not only that, you have the problem that people say, no doubt the Nazis destroyed all the records. At the end of World War two, everything was destroyed, of course. That's what the Nazis were like.
They covered their tracks. Well, ladies and gentlemen, I'm obnoxious historian who's worked for fifty years in the archives, and those archives have still not been properly researched. They're still in total disarray. And believe me, it would not have been possible in the last one or two weeks of the collapsing Third Reich for somebody to go around all the archives taking out all the references to gas chambers if they were in it, or all the references to the final solution if there were any, and destroying. They couldn't defend it.
And even if they could have destroyed all the German records relating to the final solution and all the German records which contained the fatal word gas chamber, so that there aren't any left in the archives now in Germany, they couldn't. The Nazis have destroyed what is in the British files. Because you see, we British were reading the German files. We were reading the German secret messages. When the commandant of Auschwitz Concentration Camp sent a message to Berlin reporting what he was doing, giving the actual daily statistics of how many prisoners were arriving, how many were leaving, how many were in the camp at midnight, how many had died.
We have those code messages in Britain. Those actual code messages from the commandant of Auschwitz, we know what he reported. And the chief historian of the British Secret Service who printed this in volume two of the official British history of the Secret Service as an appendix. He states, it's quite evident that huge numbers of people died in Auschwitz Concentration Camp from typhus epidemics, from illness and disease. A small number died from execution being executed by hanging or shooting.
And then he goes on to say, there is no reference in the intercepted telegrams to anybody being gassed. No reference at all. Hundreds and hundreds of code telegrams and the top secret SS code, and there's no reference to anybody being gassed in Auschwitz. These are the kind of documents which mean something to me as a historian. And that is why when people say, but what about all the eyewitness evidence?
I say eyewitness evidence baloney. Tell that to John Demianuk about eyewitness evidence, the man, the Cleveland auto worker, who was nearly hanged in Israel on the basis of eyewitness evidence until the Jewish judges in Israel, this Israeli Supreme Court said this evidence was not good enough. They themselves had to acquit John Denyano, admitting that eyewitness evidence alone was not good enough, and that the eyewitnesses had erred and that they had identified the wrong man. Eyewitness evidence is not good enough if there is a total lack of collateral evidence in the archives. And here we have to say there is no such evidence.
The Auschwitz record
@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne
With so many Holocaust survivors telling stories of the camps some claims have turned out to be inconsistent From the lady who claimed to have been raised by wolves to fluctuating death tolls Here's just a few of the inconsistencies of certain Holocaust claims: https://t.co/dEp0QULNCn
Video Transcript AI Summary
Two sources for Holocaust stories are claimed: coerced Nazi officials and Jewish survivors. The transcript enumerates sensational testimonies including gassings, torture, and bizarre acts—describing a “Tango of Death” and other gruesome scenes. It highlights Herman Rosenblatt’s apple-story, a widely publicized tale later shown to be false; he insists, “It wasn’t a lie… it was my imagination.” Other fabrications are cited: Mitig Grocer’s Sweden talks plagiarized from Mila 18; Josef Hurt fabricating Auschwitz escape; Misha DeFunsheca’s memoir found fabricated; Elie Wiesel accused by Miklos Gruner of being an impostor; Gruner disputes Wiesel’s tattoo claim and his Auschwitz identity. The text also references scientists disputing gas chambers, Auschwitz’s physical conditions, and critics arguing the Holocaust narrative is exaggerated or false, including Gerrard Menounin and Norman Fiegelsang.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The actual Holocaust stories comes from two sources: the captured high officials of the National Socialist Party that were coerced and tortured during the Nuremberg trials and the actual Jewish survivors that came out of those concentration camps. These Jewish testaments ranged from gassings, Jew eating bears and eagles in cages, vaporizing 20,000 Jews near Auschwitz with atomic energy, torturing and killing Jewish prisoners to the tempo of a specially composed Tango of Death. Steaming Jews to death like lobsters at Treblinka, electrocuting them to death, musical camp dogs ripping Jews who played false in the orchestras to death, homosexuals being tickled to death, gazers of Jewish blood, Jews being made into lampshades and soap, carts on rails that threw Jews into the ovens directly, Nazi masturbation machines and yeah, additional testaments that were given are just as ludicrous.
Speaker 1: The one thing
Speaker 2: that I'll never forget that I heard, and he said, the Nazis are taking our our young Jewish infants, and they're tearing them in half by their legs, and they're throwing them in the nester. The nester is a river. So they said, for every person that's gonna take their lives, they're gonna torture to death five of us. Then they punished us. For every man that ran to the wire.
They they took a 100 inmates, and they killed them in front of everybody. The greatest love story we've ever told on
Speaker 0: this show. Oh my goodness.
Speaker 3: Herman Rosenblatt received international attention for his story about being a hungry little boy in a Nazi concentration camp who was thrown apples every day by a little girl on the other side of the fence. Years later, according to the story, Rosenblatt met that same girl on a blind date in New York City, and he proposed on the spot.
Speaker 2: I used to come by every day, bring the apple, have in my jacket and a piece of bread, and he used to say, I'll see you tomorrow.
Speaker 3: The story landed Herman and Roma Rosenblatt on Oprah twice and in newspapers all over the world. They also got a book and movie deal, but the story wasn't true. Why did you do it? Why did you tell such a big lie to so many people for so long?
Speaker 4: It wasn't a lie. It was I it was my imagination. And in my imagination, in my mind, I believed it. Even now, I believe it. That she was there, and she threw the apple to me.
Speaker 3: How how can you say it wasn't a lie? It it wasn't true, and and you know it's not true.
Speaker 4: Yes. It's not true. But in my imagination, it was true.
Speaker 3: Members of his own family say his real motivation was money. Herman and Roma Rosenblatt told their false story publicly for more than a decade, but it all fell apart about six weeks ago after Holocaust scholars proved that it was physically impossible for prisoners to approach the fence at the concentration camp where Herman was kept and that Roma's family was actually more than 200 miles away at the time. Rosenblatt is remarkably unrepentant about his years of lying.
Speaker 4: I pronounce my love for you forever.
Speaker 3: When you look at that, does it make you uncomfortable at all? No. You think that was the right thing to do?
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 3: And and and while you were up on the stage there with all these people, in the back of your mind, you not thinking I'm not telling the truth here. No. So if you had to do it over again, would you tell the same story? Yeah. You would?
Yes.
Speaker 2: I simply don't know what to say. I mean, it's his imagination, but he knows it's not true.
Speaker 3: He said he made up he made up a fantasy world, and he was living in that fantasy world.
Speaker 2: And his son says, tried to stop him? Yes. Good heavens. Okay. Thank you, Dan.
Pleasure.
Speaker 0: Mitig Grocer towards Sweden talking to children, telling them of the horrors of the German concentration camps. It turned out that his story was directly plagiarized from a fictional book called Mila 18 from 1961. Josef Hurt from Pennsylvania gave public speeches for years where he claimed to have escaped from Auschwitz and even met evil Nazi doctor, Josef Mengele. He had now confessed that he had fabricated the entire story. He admitted that everything was a lie.
Hurt had even tattooed a fake prison number on his arm to make people believe in his lies. Otto Utkinant had for years been paid shekels to lecture in German schools about his experiences of the Holocaust. He has talked about the Crystal Knight, how he lost 72 relatives including mother, father and sister and how he himself was interned at Buchenwald. However, Otto now admits that the whole story was a lie. Misha DeFunsheca wrote a best selling memoir about her experience of the Holocaust.
Her story was published almost twenty years ago as Misha, a Memoir of the Holocaust Years. The book describes how when she was six, her Jewish parents were taken from their home by the Nazis and how she set off across Belgium and Germany and Poland to find them on foot, leaving out stolen scraps of food until she was adopted by a pack of wolves. She also claimed to have shot a Nazi soldier in self defense. The story became a huge bestseller and was even made into a film in France. But in 2008 it was found to be fabricated and everything was a lie.
The author whose real name was found to be Monica de Valle said that it is not the true reality but it's my reality. There are times when I find it difficult to differentiate between reality and my inner world. Misha will now have to pay back the money she was awarded, which amounts to $22,500,000 Elie Wiesel has told us for fifty years that while at Auschwitz he was tattooed on his left arm the number A7713. He also adds that his father was given the number A7712, but a real Auschwitz survivor, Miklos Gruner claims that Elie Wiesel is an impostor. Miklos who actually was at the camp claims that Elie Wiesel stole the identity of a real man named Lazar Wiesel who the number eighty seven thousand seven hundred thirteen actually belonged to.
First of all, if you look at his arms, Elie Wiesel does not have a tattoo. The number 8700712 actually were given to a man named Abraham Wiesel, Lazar's older brother. Eli Wiesel never claimed that he saw any homicidal gas chambers, instead he claims that he witnessed evil Germans throwing Jewish babies in gigantic flames sleeping up from a ditch. But this has also been debunked by scientists, historians and engineers. Auschwitz was built on a swamp with a high water table which made it impossible for bodies to have been burned in ditches.
Not to mention that it was impossible for human bodies to be totally consumed by flames in this manner because of lack of oxygen. Miklos however says that he never saw any ditches where children were burning. Eli Wiesel explains that some events do take place but are not true. Others are, although they never occurred. In 1986, Miklos Gruner met Eli Wiesel in Stockholm.
Miklos thought that he was going to meet Lazar Wiesel. But after the meeting Miklos said, I was stunned to see a man I did not recognize at all. He was not my fellow prisoner. Miklus also was surprised that Eli couldn't speak Hungarian, but spoke English with a strong French accent, even though Huizel claims that he was born in Hungary. Neither Elie Wiesel nor his father, Shlomo Wiesel, are named in any records from Auschwitz or Buchenwald.
After the war, Elie Wiesel joined the Jewish terrorist group Irgun. Anyway, Elie Wiesel is today laughing all the way to the bank as his best selling book Night brought him international recognition at millions of dollars. He even won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1986. Out of thousands of real Jewish survivors from the German camps, the international Jewish community handpicked Zionist and hate filled liars to spread anti German propaganda. But of course, not all Jews are lying.
Many Jews don't agree with the Holocaust narrative, and many of them testified that they never saw any mass murders or gassings. But these Jews have effectively been silenced by anti free speech, signist organizations to cover up the truth. Paul Rasinier was arrested by the Gestapo in October 1943 and deported to Germany, where he was held prisoner until the end of the war in Buchenwald and Dora Concentration Camps. Rasinier was upset by the many lies and myths about the concentration camps that were being circulated. French resistance members who also were interned in various German concentration camps during the war including Auschwitz and other alleged death camps, they all gave accounts of their treatment by the Germans and they all denied any knowledge of gas chambers and a mass murder program in the camps.
Rysigner said that never at any moment did the responsible authorities of the Third Reich intend to order or in fact order the extermination of the Jews in this or any other manner. Maria van Herwarden testified about her camp experience in a Toronto District Court in March 1988. She testified that she witnessed the deaths of many fellow inmates by deceased and particularly typhus, and she saw some take their own lives, but she saw no evidence at all of mass killings, gassings or of any extermination program. The Jew Benedict Kochsky, who spent the years from 1938 to 1945 in concentration camps, three of these in Auschwitz, said: I was in the big concentration camps in Germany. I must truthfully state that in no camp have I ever seen anything that might have resembled gas chambers.
A Jewish woman named Marika Frank arrived at Auschwitz Birkenau from Hungary in July 1944, when 25,000 Jews were supposedly gassed and cremated daily according to the official story. She testified after the war that she heard and saw nothing of gas chambers during the time she was interned there. Jewish writer Gerrard Menounin says, the Holocaust is the biggest lie in history. Germany has no blame for the second world war. That Jewish pressure has inflicted laws on democratic societies to prevent questions and incessant promotion and indoctrination of the same advertently inconsistable Holocaust proves it must be a lie.
Why else would no one be allowed to question it? Jewish professor Norman Fiegelsang says, the Holocaust proved to be the perfect weapon for deflecting criticism of Israel. The Holocaust may yet turn out to be the greatest robbery in the history of mankind. Jewish chief rabbi Aria Friedman says, the Holocaust is a successful historical fiction. Jewish professor Roger de Margo said
Speaker 1: I know that the problem, for instance, of the Holocaust is a complete fake because it's very easy to know because it's it's a simple technical arithmetic problem which could be solved by a child in high school. Any chemist know that you can't gas people with cyanide acid. Let's call it that in English. Hydrocynic Hydrocynic acid. 1,000 or 2,000 people at the time, it's well known, and, even the most important American Jewish newspapers, like the American Jewish Yearbook, said that there was 3,003,000 Jews in occupied Europe in 1942.
So I don't see how they could have killed 6,000,000 Jews when there was only three millions. You know, they So I think anybody can see that. I I listed in 1944. I see. I listed for three years, 1944.
It was in the world. The world finished in 1945. But I was in the army 1944 because, of course, as everybody did, I believe that Hitler was the real monster that everybody said he was. But since I have studied what happened in Nazism, under Nazism, what Hitler did want to do and say when you read these books, what maybe anybody can read Mein Kampfel can read myth of the twentieth century by Rosenberg. And anybody can know also what happened these last fifty years when declared I absolutely had nothing to do and not the slightest influence because Nazi has been there now for fifty years.
So you can do what happened. And what happens, I told you in my my lecture, it's absolutely incredible. And at the top of everything, you can see the Jews. I told you, I studied the books which really expresses Nazism, that is to say, Meigumpf and the myth of the twentieth century by Rosenberg. As to what's happened during the war, and especially what Hitler actually did, which is hidden, which is concealed to us.
What what he did in Germany. And the only know thing we know about Hitler is that he killed 6,000,000 Jews who never existed in gas chambers, which nobody ever saw. That's all that's the only thing which people know about Hitler. But when you really know that this what he did, what he actually did in Germany, well, when you have studied all that, you see that you have been completely completely misled to use a
Speaker 0: mild
@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne
Next, what was life was like inside the camps? Well, surprisingly, the camps had theaters, swimming pools, soccer leagues, orchestras, and even plays But don’t take my word for it, let the Holocaust survivors tell you themselves: https://t.co/eJD14ivPJ4
Video Transcript AI Summary
Culture persisted at Auschwitz: a grand piano in Block 1, a downstairs theatre, and curtain rings sewn. I helped arrange music for each instrument from the director’s score on scarce paper. The camp library and newspapers, a violin quartet, and a camp movie in barracks offered entertainment; later, Germans allowed cinema and letters by postcard. Stamps and money from Vienna’s Jewish community, plus coupons redeemable in a cantina, funded small purchases, mostly cigarettes. On weekends we formed soccer teams; by 1944 in Rosen, organized matches continued as food waned. Weddings and maternity wards existed; over three thousand live births were registered in Auschwitz, with not a single infant death, and a nursery operated. Freddie Hirsch had me paint walls for the children; Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs inspired a playful mural and a hush-hush performance watched by SS.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We also had an orchestra where some of the musicians stood together and one musician was so good that he had the instruments playing and he wrote the notes. So later on we had a band who played over the weekend. And, that was, of course, helping us. You know, we also did plays and stuff.
Speaker 1: Were there any cultural activities happening in Auschwitz? Yes. I told you we had a piano put into a not just a piano, a grand piano was brought into Block 1. Once that was built, that new block, the downstairs room was assigned for theatre. When he wanted to build a stage curtain in that new Block 1, which was one big dining room was going to be also with the stage, so performances could be done for women there, culture.
He said, for heaven's sake, isn't there anybody here who can help me sew on these curtain rings for the stage. I do it for you, he says. And I came forward and I helped him with the curtain stage. And that was wonderful because I had a man sitting across me for a change. And my room mate is in charge of work assignments.
And if you happen to know music, what instruments do you play? I said, I learned piano, but not good enough for an orchestra. I can tell you that right now. He said, well then maybe you know the notes. I said, yes.
He said, well then I can use you because we have to write it from the original music piece what the director gets to the instruments. And so for each instrument has only short line on the whole paper. So I had to take it apart and write for each instrument. From that what I had to do. I had to even make the lines.
We didn't have paper that was pre printed for notes, nothing. So I spent the whole day there for a while until we were taken away from Auschwitz. But then she saw me work there, I had a big table where I could work and lay out all the paper and it was very peaceful and relaxing. And wanted to talk more to me. That is when I met that SS man at one time.
That was the last job I did while I was in Auschwitz. And when I the other job that when I was in Block 10, we went out to pick the leaves. And from these leaves, they would make tea for the whole camp, for the whole Auschwitz.
Speaker 2: How did you entertain yourselves?
Speaker 3: Well, there were at that at at the beginning of those days, there was a library where you people could get books to read. There were newspapers that we could get. And that and also among ourselves sometimes we had a violin quartet used to come and play in barracks. And they even later on, they said they're gonna build a movie in the camp. And the prisoners said said, only you must be crazy.
They're make a movie for us in in in the camp. And then it happened. They made a movie in the camp. Yeah. And we we went in barracks after barrack.
We we could go to see a movie sometimes in the evening. They brought movies in to the in the evening. And
Speaker 2: What kind of movies would they show?
Speaker 3: German movies. Once I came to the main camp, they were allowed twice a month to ride home. Once a postcard and once a letter.
Speaker 2: They gave you the materials?
Speaker 3: Yeah. They gave us the letter, the materials, and we could
Speaker 2: How did
Speaker 1: you get the stamps?
Speaker 3: Stamps. We could buy stamps.
Speaker 2: Could You had money?
Speaker 3: Yeah. We got my we still got my with the money we got through the Jewish community from Vienna who sent us. Everybody, you some money.
Speaker 2: And and in the camp you could have currency?
Speaker 3: Yeah. They could have money because there was in camp also what they call a cantina and not many times, but once in a while they sold a few cigarettes or they sold something, whatever they had. So if you had money, you could buy in that cantina there. Food, there wasn't really any food really. They usually sold and sometimes they sold they sold some weak beer that sold also in the in the yeah.
But not really anything else, not much. Mostly cigarettes.
Speaker 2: And when you went to the movies, did you have to pay?
Speaker 3: Yes. We had to pay. After the the money stopped, the regular money stopped, we got paid in coupons then.
Speaker 2: Paid for your work?
Speaker 3: Well, I don't know if it was for whatever. We got paid for in coupons for which were redeemable in the in that canteen if they had something. So that was their their way of distributing money then to everybody, everybody got this money then.
Speaker 0: Of course what we did is for the weekends we got together, we got a group of us together and we made a soccer team which was about a little later where we
Speaker 4: played soccer. It's amazing that there would be a soccer team, that there'd be
Speaker 3: enough energy left to do something like that.
Speaker 0: Well, I don't think we were quite as energetic as we were with the other regular team, but we did something to, you know, it kept our mind off these, of the problems we had.
Speaker 5: Especially the Germans started losing the war, 1943, 1944. So 1944 we had soccer games in Rosrose. Soccer teams, we organized very well, soccer teams, each nationality organized a soccer team and we organized our equipment and everything to play soccer in the assembly line and assembly place. In Rosen. In Gross Rosen.
So, you know, that much free it was in there, but it was like the 44. Russians already pushed away, Americans already invaded on the other side, so there they have to give more freedom. But that was much more freedom and food didn't improve very much because simple reason, they didn't have it very much themselves.
Speaker 6: Did the civilians try to help you at all? Did they trade goods for things?
Speaker 5: It's as I say, we have almost everything, what we wanted, whether it's soccer teams, from the civilians, from Markside civilians. But that
Speaker 3: was
Speaker 5: strictly under the cover. They knew it but they didn't do much about it because they knew the war was almost all of us. They didn't, they even played soccer with us. Just to make the store funny, the toy incident funny that one time the Polish team played against German teams and one of the top enlisted assessment decided he wants to play for the Polish team. So we say okay, you can play for us.
And then the commandant, SS commandant, he was like a captain. He decided to want to play for the German team. So, he went in the field. I think they were a little bit tipsy.
Speaker 6: How did you feel about that?
Speaker 5: And the funny part of it, we said, you just let them play, they play almost by themselves. We just run around them. But that was one of the incidents which stuck so funny in it. But that's happened, it was 1944, it almost things came to close.
Speaker 6: So, what you're saying then that the closer the end of the war came, pressure was let up rather than becoming more cool?
Speaker 5: In our camp, you did feel the pressure made up.
Speaker 7: There were weddings and even maternity wards for pregnant women. Inmates were falling in love and getting married in the camps. Over three thousand live births were registered in Auschwitz alone, with not a single infant death while it was in operation under German rule. The evil Nazis even set up a nursery for the children.
Speaker 8: Freddie Hirsch called me to the children's barracks he was heading then, and he asked me if I could paint something on the wall for the children. And I said, well, if you can get the materials, he said, I'll get the materials. I said, okay. And then a very handsome young blonde man from the men's camp came over one day. And Freddie Hirsch called me to come and meet him.
And he asked me what I need. So I said, well, if I can get any wall paints, so any tempera paints, I would like those. If you can get me some, and he said, yes. Anything you want. And so before I knew it, Freddie had the stuff ready for me, and I started painting.
At first, not knowing what, I looked at that huge drab. It was kind of olive colored like all the barracks were wall. And I thought, well, the thing to do is to make it look like we are in a Swiss chalet on the deck, and there is a balustrade with flowers and flower pots on it. And we are looking out at the beautiful meadows and maybe see some cows and sheep and stuff, and I started painting. And then afterwards, far in the distance, I was putting some sheep and some cows, and then I noticed that all the kids were standing around me, behind me.
So I turned around and I asked them if they would do they have any special wish what to put in that meadow? And they said, Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. And that was a very surprising answer. So I made a painting of Dopey standing on another dwarf's head with a cloak around him so he looked like a tall guy, so he would be as tall as Snow White. And they were dancing together, and the shoes, those soft shoes and everything.
And the kids loved it. And I made some other dwarves around, one who was playing the accordion. I think there was Grumpy, the mean one. And the professor with the glasses. I made almost all the dwarfs standing around.
Some of them were clapping, and that's what the kids like. I now understand that there was another painter who continued something painting on the walls after I've left. I don't know about that.
Speaker 9: When you were in the process of doing that
Speaker 8: Yeah.
Speaker 9: What did it do not only for for you, but for the for the children
Speaker 8: on on an emotional level. Well, it did several things, not just emotional, but the children then wrote a play which was a satire of Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. So I figured out a way of making a crown out of paper, and the kids were painting it gold and putting, like, jewels on it. And then I took some paper strips and I painted them with a black paint. And I don't know about the costumes, what what they made costumes out of, but the play was very successful because the little girl who was, playing Snow White had an incredible voice, a gorgeous soprano, just like the one that you hear in the movie.
Speaker 9: How were they allowed to put on a play in Auschwitz?
Speaker 8: I don't know, but it was done kind of quite hush-hush, all of it, except that when it was put on, suddenly some SS men appeared and they watched. And then when Arnold Behm put on that play, he he wanted something like a Wardville Wardville play, which I was into. That was when I couldn't stand the breath of the guy who was playing with me.
Speaker 7: The building just left entering Auschwitz was actually a brothel used by the internees of the camp. Hospitals and camp dental facilities attended by camp inmates, dentists and nurses to deal with the inmates dental problems. The Auschwitz Camp had sick bays and hospitals where thousands of inmates were cured. The camp authorities foremost the garrison physician doctor Wirths tried all imaginable ways to keep the Auschwitz inmates alive, strong and healthy. The Holocaust
Speaker 0: is
@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne
Here's David Irving again, this time he discusses Hitler’s apprehension to using nerve gas on Allied soldiers This is fascinating because it shows Hitler had a double standard for using nerve gas in the camps vs on troops... https://t.co/0DQG10MRP3
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Fuhrer has absolutely forbidden the use of poison gas. The enemy is to use it first, and then we will retaliate with ours.
the Germans would have won the war because the Germans had not just poison gases like mustard, the Germans had nerve gases.
At this time, in 1944, they already had stockpiles of 30,000 tons of nerve gases, sarin and tabun.
But he had put his name on a piece of paper, the Geneva Gas Protocol, saying that he would never use gas first because it would be a war crime.
the nine or 10 panzer divisions out of Normandy and sent them to the Russian front.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And embargoed anywhere the use of poison gas. It's it's there. The actual document signed by Hitler, the references in the vows of the German high command, the verbatim references by him and the shorthand records of his meetings, the shorthand records of meetings in the German air ministry. The Fuhrer has absolutely forbidden the use of poison gas. The enemy is to use it first, and then we will retaliate with ours.
The reason being, the reason that makes this yardstick so extraordinary is that if Churchill had done what he was threatening and dropped the poison gas on German cities, the Germans would have won the war because the Germans had not just poison gases like mustard, the Germans had nerve gases. At this time, in 1944, they already had stockpiles of 30,000 tons of nerve gases, sarin and tabun, the famous nerve is being used even now by the Russians in Afghanistan and in Iraq and in Angola and elsewhere where the Russian troops are fighting. The nerve gases sarin and tabun, Hitler already had stockpiles of 30,000 tons, and nobody found out till the war was over, which is just as well because if Hitler had ever used it in Normandy, fighting the Allied, the American, the French, the British troops in Normandy, the Canadians as well, it would have been the end of the bridgehead because we didn't have a gas mask. We had no gas mask which would have stopped the German nerve gases. It would have been the end of the bridgehead.
And isn't it strange that Adolf Hitler, the devil incarnate, had the means whereby he could have secured an immediate strategic advantage, which would have turned the war because he would have pulled the nine or 10 panzer divisions out of Normandy and sent them to the Russian front. And with those high grade divisions, he would have wiped the floor with the Russians and ended the war by Christmas nineteen forty four. But he had put his name on a piece of paper, the Geneva Gas Protocol, saying that he would never use gas first because it would be a war crime.
@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne
Ok, we're almost done... This next clip discusses the marketing of the Holocaust after WWII, the rising and falling Auschwitz death tolls, and the history of the 6 million number But most importantly: It shows the tactics used against Holocaust "Deniers"
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 urges historical perspective, noting the wartime Soviet alliance and that their anti-Nazi propaganda was accepted by the Allies; as victors, the Soviets "got to commit their propaganda to the history books as fact." He says current knowledge of Stalin's despotism and the KGB's deception, and the camps Majdanek, Belzec, Kelno, Treblinka, and Sobibor, have required relying on Soviet sources. "I believe in the inarguable fact that 6,000,000 Jews were killed in the war by Adolf Hitler and Nazis." He asks Speaker 2 if he believes that figure. Speaker 2 replies, "But I don't think 6,000,000 Jews were gassed. Now be careful. I I beg of you. This is against the law in Germany. If there was a German somebody that's in German state, you could have me thrown into prison before I leave Germany."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think it's necessary to put this matter in its proper historical perspective. You see, we live in a time now when the old Soviet Union has fallen apart, and it's now okay for both liberals and conservatives as well as everybody else to speak ill of the departed communist state. But it was not always that way. During World War two, the Soviets were more than just a military ally. Their anti Nazi propaganda was readily accepted by the other allies because it served all of their purposes.
The point is that as the victors, the Soviets got to commit their propaganda to the history books as fact. With the 2020 hindsight we now have, the knowledge of Stalin's despotism, and the KGB's history of misinformation and deception, as well as the other camps in Poland, Majdanek, Belzec, Kelno, Treblinka, and Sobibor, we've had to rely on the Soviets for most of our information.
Speaker 1: I believe in the inarguable fact that 6,000,000 Jews were killed in the war by Adolf Hitler and Nazis. I'm merely asking you, as a president of Iran and as a scholar, do you believe that 6,000,000 Jews were killed by the Nazis, or do you think that is not true?
Speaker 2: But I don't think 6,000,000 Jews were gassed. Now be careful. I I beg of you. This is against the law in Germany. If there was a German somebody that's in German state, you could have me thrown into prison before I leave Germany.
I hope that's not your intention.
@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne
And last but not least, let's take look at how the Holocaust narrative is still used to this very day: https://t.co/fwVdCeUaus
Video Transcript AI Summary
"I was in DACA for seventeen months after the war as a US department attorney and can state that there was no gas chamber in Dachau, nor was there a gas chamber at any of the other concentration camps in Germany."
"no document has been found that proves that a plan for Jewish extermination by the third Reich was ever contemplated. Expulsion, yes, but extermination, no."
"The Holocaust narrative is used to strengthen Jewish identity simultaneously as undermining, demonizing, and delegitimizing white European identity."
"The Holocaust narrative is primarily used to discourage policies such as nationalism and instead promote globalism and multiculturalism in the Western world."
"Any criticism against the Jews or the Jewish State of Israel had practically been outlawed."
"The mere fact that Holocaust denial laws in Europe exist should raise an eyebrow."
"Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Stephen F. Pinter, who served as a lawyer for the United States War Department in the occupation forces in Germany and Austria for six years after the war, made the following statement: I was in DACA for seventeen months after the war as a US department attorney and can state that there was no gas chamber in Dachau, nor was there a gas chamber at any of the other concentration camps in Germany.
Speaker 1: I challenge your history again. There is absolutely no record that 6,000,000 people were put in concentration camps. They only have 16,000,000 to begin with.
Speaker 2: But in spite of Jewish opposition to historical integrity, Holocaust revisionists are breaking the bars erected around their imprisonment of conscience and speaking out. Robert Farison, for instance, a recognized French specialist in document analysis, has stated that no document has been found that proves that a plan for Jewish extermination by the third Reich was ever contemplated. Expulsion, yes, but extermination, no. As punishment for challenging the official holocaust line, Forrestin has been repeatedly the victim of physical assault, countless legal actions, freezings of his bank account, and heavy fines. In the year February, Swiss scholar Jurgen Groff, author of the book The Holocaust Swindle, after receiving a two year jail sentence for allegedly questioning the existence of gas chambers in Auschwitz, fled to Saint Petersburg where he's been living ever since as an exile.
There in Saint Petersburg, Groff is engaged in examining Soviet archives which Groff claims when allowed for release will bring Jewry's official version of the holocaust to its knees. Particularly scandalous and a blow to free speech and historical inquiry is the arrest of German lawyer Horst Mahler. In 02/2009, Mahler was sentenced by two German courts to eleven years in prison total for opinion crimes. One of them being Mueller's assertion that the official version of the Holocaust is the greatest lie ever perpetrated in human history.
Speaker 0: The benefits of exegregating the Holocaust have been enormous to sinus Jews both financially and politically. The Holocaust is today used as a guilt weapon as many racial groups exploit the empathy that white Europeans are known to have in order to guilt trip them into a collective guilt by making whites feel shameful and guilty about their past.
Speaker 3: Give them the guilt, man.
Speaker 4: That's yeah. Absolutely.
Speaker 5: We need to
Speaker 4: play on that guilt.
Speaker 6: You always
Speaker 4: I bring up everything from the past. Fifty years.
Speaker 3: The
Speaker 0: left, communists, or Jews hear a person discussing anything related to immigration, demographics, or race realism, they immediately label that person as a neo Nazi, the next Hitler, or antisemitic. This is done to shut down the conversation and to make the person look like a hateful bigot.
Speaker 7: Really quite dangerous, racist, fascist rhetoric. People don't think that it's okay to be a fucking Nazi anymore. It's basically the same as quoting Hitler.
Speaker 3: There's a bunch of
Speaker 8: opportunistic hate mongering fascists trying to garner sympathy with garbage propaganda videos. I directly compared everyone who talked about cultural Marxists to the fascist literal Nazis who invented the term.
Speaker 5: Racism is especially sensitive against individuals who are murdered in the millions.
Speaker 9: Very racist and antisemitic things. This is kind of embarrassing, but this hits somewhat close to home since some of my family aligns with that way of thinking. They don't think that it happened. Just gonna erase all that history. Sounds like my grandpa or any other racist person.
Bliten the Jews. This is literally my grandpa.
Speaker 5: Of course, she doesn't even believe that the holocaust even fucking happened. Well, mean, he did kill, like, 6,000,000 fucking Jews. I mean, believe it or not, he also killed 6,000,000 fucking Jews. Listen, you fucking cow. Okay?
When you kill 6,000,000 Jews, it doesn't matter what you did in the past.
Speaker 6: Holocaust. Yeah. Yeah. We're gonna talk to Mercedes Carrera.
Speaker 3: The 6,000,000. 6,000,000.
Speaker 6: When I was a punk rocker when I was a punk rocker, brother
Speaker 3: 6,000,000. You're never sick, but I don't know. It was it was 6,000,000.
Speaker 0: The Holocaust narrative is used to strengthen Jewish identity simultaneously as undermining, demonizing, and delegitimizing white European identity. It is used as a manipulative weapon weapon against all white Europeans. I have done my research. Shane. I have done my research.
Speaker 3: Shane. Shane. Shane. Shane.
Speaker 5: Shane.
Speaker 10: Now, you owe me some money. Okay? You owe me reparations. Why is that?
Speaker 8: Because every freedom that I have and have taken for granted for my entire life has been made possible by wealth that my ancestors stole.
Speaker 0: The Holocaust narrative is primarily used to discourage policies such as nationalism and instead promote globalism and multiculturalism in the Western world. Europeans are constantly reminded of never forget, never again and that the horrors will never be repeated. This is done to brainwash the Europeans to not stand up for their own nation and race. Through this narrative, the Europeans support the politics that protect the rights of minority groups instead of their own people. Any criticism against the Jews or the Jewish State of Israel had practically been outlawed.
The Jewish Holocaust turning to a religion in which no deviation from the orthodoxy is acceptable. Even if there have been many holocausts and greater genocides throughout history, the Jewish holocaust is the only one that counts and it is of course the only one of whose orthodoxy is criminalized to even question. In fact, it is the only historical event that is prohibited by law to even question in many countries. The reason why you probably never even have heard about this research that have proven the official story to be false, is because researchers who have dared to explore the many inconsistencies and contradictions of the holocaust story have been subjected to physical attacks including harassment, vandalism, career destruction, drive by shootings, physical assaults and even firebombings of the warehouse that holds their work. Jewish and signist anti free speech organizations are doing everything they can to suppress the truth through censoring the Internet and burning the books that expose their lies.
Thanks to the pressure from anti free speech organizations, Facebook, YouTube and other social media are doing their best to repress and silence the truth and we cannot even rely on these platforms to be used in the future. Wikipedia and Google is both monitored to fit the politically correct narrative to mislead the population.
Speaker 6: Moet Zetiash in conjunction with My Israel has arranged instruction day for wiki editors. The goal of the day is to teach people how to edit in Wikipedia, which is the number one source of information today in the world. As a way of example, if someone searches the Gaza flotilla, we wanna be there. We wanna be the the guys who influence what is written there, how it's written, and to ensure that it's balanced and Zionist in nature.
Speaker 10: I came here to learn more about how we, as Israelis and as Jews, can defend Israel online on the Internet, and particularly in Wikipedia in this case. Wikipedia is a bit of a complex system, it's sometimes hard to figure out the rules. I personally tried to edit things in Wikipedia that were against Israel. Knowledge is important for anyone who wants to be active in defending Israel on the Internet so that we can go and we can see the information and we can say this isn't quite right. It's showing one side of the story, and I can I have the the power and the right to change that?
And in general, it's so important for us to be online working to defend our ourselves and to prove to to the world and to ourselves that we are just and we are right. And because right now, if you look online, if you do searches for certain terms related to Israel, you just it's just filled with antisemitism, anti Zionism, and garbage. And there's not enough of us out there working to counteract that and make sure that the other side of the story, our side of the story, and our right side of the story is getting the right coverage and the coverage that it needs, so
Speaker 0: In our supposedly free and democratic countries that frequently pride themselves of being tolerant, third world invaders are now raping European women and receive the most lenient sentence. Meanwhile, Holocaust deniers or anti Semites can get many years in prison for merely questioning a historical event. It is clear that our governments are not working for our people anymore. According to Gerhard Menonin, there were 117,344 accusations of thought crimes in the German courts in the year nineteen ninety four-two thousand and four. Around 2,000 people are put on trial every year for holocaust denial, which can give up to five years in prison and a fine.
Speaker 3: Most of the people in England, America, Australia have no idea what a tyranny this country is.
Speaker 4: Hundreds, we have more than 2,000 process, more than 2,000 trials a year and that over more than ten years. So you can imagine how many people have suffered from it and families have been destroyed and they lost their job and so on and so on. That says the truth. And simply for inquiring, simply for inquiring into They the sources for are not promoting any ideas, they are simply asking questions like you do. Yes, and now what happened in Paris is just for us because all the heads of the nation said press free and meaning freedom is the greatest thing for democracy.
And therefore I say I use this freedom.
Speaker 0: The Holocaust is a story that the globalists don't allow to even be debated or questioned. Anyone who questions the story immediately is branded as a racist, a Nazi who wants to kill 6,000,000 Jews and a Holocaust denier, hater or anti Semite. This labeling technique is used to discourage discourse in discussions related to Holocaust and World War two. Holocaust revisionism is today considered a taboo matter, with laws and prison sentences applied to Europeans who questions the politically correct Holocaust narrative. This is a gross infringement on Article 19 in the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights.
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression. This right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. The mere fact that Holocaust denial laws in Europe exist should raise an eyebrow. Truth does not fear investigation. You certainly do not need to make up laws to protect history unless you are trying to protect a lie.
The truth stands on its own legs.
@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne
A final note: As you can see, Holocaust Revisionism doesn't "deny" the Holocaust It believes many of the events that constitute what we collectively know as "The Holocaust" did take place But it also understands that we need to be able to have an honest discussion about historical events, especially when those events are used to this day to exemplify the evils of White collectivism and to solicit reparations for those evils Holocaust Revisionism merely seeks to have an honest and open discussion about the events of the Holocaust and firmly believes this statement to be true: The truth fears no investigation
reSee.it AI Summary
A user asserts that Jews receive reparations, exploit gentiles to advance Israel, and that Jewish crime is hidden; they claim Jews spread false Holocaust narratives, deny gas chambers, and label the Holocaust a fabrication used to control history and education. They argue work camps had amenities, accuse Jews of wealth extraction, and claim “final solution” never existed, prompting ongoing denial and conspiracy claims.
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Do jews still receive reparations from their fabricated German Holocaust? YES. They steal, plunder, and squeezing dry the gentiles as much as they can. Jews use these plundered resources to advance the state of Israel and impede the rise of nationalism. https://t.co/BcxKdAUbpr
Video Transcript AI Summary
The conversation touches on a sequence of controversial assertions that connect politics, finance, war, and media narratives, followed by a shift to fitness industry transparency. The speakers discuss economics, implying that there was “complete depression to, like, the most booming economy in the world” within a couple of years, and they urge asking why this happened by examining “the things or the changes that took place when he took office and started to and what he implemented,” insisting there is “a reason for why it had such a surplus in growth and a complete one eighty turn into the positive direction.”
They then move to a claim about banking and a Rothschild figure, stating that after the banking incident, there was “literally arrest arrested one of the Rothschilds and, like, ransomed him back,” and assert that this is “probably a lot of the reasons why the war really kicked off.” The dialogue continues with a provocative assertion that “war is the most profitable thing of all time,” adding that “the Jews are still profiting off World War two, and that's why they wanna keep the whole Holocaust thing.” This leads to a claim that there would be money continuing to be made off the Holocaust, suggesting that “they're still making money off it,” and that “they use that” as a shield to justify ongoing actions “so it's like, I think it is important to take it on.”
The speakers emphasize the importance of truth, even if challenging the Holocaust is controversial, arguing that truth is important and that speaking it out matters because it reveals what is “true.” They contend that in society there is a problem when “we can't talk about the truth,” and they connect this to current events or narratives about accountability and transparency.
The discussion then shifts to the speaker’s identity as a fitness influencer who focuses on exposing fraud in the fitness industry, confirming that this is part of their mission and past. The conversation frames the same lens of transparency: just owning flaws or questionable actions and speaking the truth. They argue that some fitness figures “clearly [are] juiced out of their mind” and tell kids they are “natural,” which the speakers view as a problem. They acknowledge that people should be aware that looking like that is not natural, while clarifying that taking steroids does not make someone a bad person; rather, there should be honesty about it.
Finally, they begin a closing line noting that “everyone makes” claims or judgments—indicating a broader stance on accountability and openness across both public discourse and personal branding.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Boom, like complete depression to, like, the most booming economy in the world Right.
Speaker 1: In a couple years. And then all you have to really do is ask yourself why and then just look at the things or the changes that took place when he took office and started to and what he implemented. And there's a reason for why it had such a surplus in growth and a complete one eighty turn into the positive direction.
Speaker 0: After the banking, arrested, literally arrest arrested one of the Rothschilds and, like, ransomed him back. This is this is probably a lot of the reasons why the war really kicked off.
Speaker 1: I mean, too, also, if you think about war is the most profitable thing of all time. You know, the Jews are still profiting off World War two, and that's why they wanna keep the whole Holocaust thing.
Speaker 0: That's crazy. They're no one
Speaker 1: they're still making money off it.
Speaker 0: There'd be they use that. People like, oh, you shouldn't take people tell me, oh, you shouldn't challenge the Holocaust, you know, because it's just why it's a bad look. But it is important. One for truth. Two, because they're still getting money and they use it as a shield.
They use it as, oh, the Holocaust so we can do this. So it's like, I think it is important to take it on. You're like, oh, it's good. You know, you're gonna get called a Nazi taking that on, but it's like, but it's what's true. Yeah.
That's important to me. What's truth is important.
Speaker 1: And that's when you have a problem in society. We can't talk about the truth. I think in any regard.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, you you kinda came on as a fitness influencer. I didn't know a lot about you, but your whole thing is about exposing the truth and fraud in the fitness industry. Correct?
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 0: It was kind of always your past. So you're just doing the
Speaker 1: same transparency. Just owning like if you have flaws or you're doing certain things, just owning it and speaking the truth and
Speaker 0: the transparency about it. So these guys are clearly juiced out of their mind. They're telling kids, oh, I'm natural. That is a problem. It's like you can't look like that naturally, and people should be aware of that.
It's like, it doesn't mean they're bad people for taking the steroids, but a little honesty should be there.
Speaker 1: Because I think everyone makes
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript describes a shift toward reparations in Europe, spurred in part by United States pressure, which enabled funding for European Jewish culture. In Sweden, despite its wartime neutrality and lack of losses, Social Democrat prime minister Johan Pershing and deputy secretary Jan Eliason felt Sweden bore a burden from its neutrality, including allowing Nazi transit to Norway with devastating effects on Norwegian Jews. This led to the creation of an institute to reignite European Jewish culture: PAIDEA, the European Institute for Jewish Studies in Sweden. The aim was to revitalize European Jewish life, with Annaly traveling across Europe to recruit participants, providing Eurail train tickets to travel and study.
Participants arrived from many countries and formed a distinctive group described as the “disc assimilators,” a generation aware of why they are Jewish and literate. In 2014, the Glamsted Declaration arose, describing a group of activists, thinkers, and artists committed to renewing Jewish life and culture in Europe. They state that matters relating to antisemitism and the State of Israel have influenced Jewish interaction with the wider European community. They believe Jewish thought and experience can contribute to a more just and democratic Europe, that Jewish communities can model minority citizenship based on integration without assimilation, and that Jewish thought can contribute to European Jewish values by examining universalizing claims through a multiplicity of voices. The passage ends with a rhetorical question: “Why did this make me cry?”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The whole era of reparations began. Again, much under the the pressure of The United States, nevertheless, European countries began to come to terms with the role that they had played in the Holocaust and reparations beginning. Now why was that so important for the flourishing of European jewelry? Because among other things, it meant that there was some funding that was available that wasn't before. Something unique took place in Sweden.
Sweden was neutral during the war. There was no legal, thankfully. There was no loss of life. There was no loss of property. But because of who you see on your left, then Social Democrat prime minister, Johan Pershing, and the secretary his deputy secretary general, Jan Eliason, what he what bothered him was he didn't feel that Sweden was that being neutral was such a virtue.
In fact, just the opposite. He felt that Sweden carried a great burden. It did allow after all the Brazilian things. It allowed the transport of Nazi force forces over Sweden territory into Norway with devastating results for the Norwegian Jews. And he began to talk to the then two heads of the community, Gabriel Berwitz, who you also see on your screen, and Leno Bosner Karoszik.
And what was determined was that an institute would be formed to mandate that would be mandated to reignite Jewish culture in Europe. Eureka, and Liard, the next step. PAIDEA, the European Institute for Jewish Studies in Sweden, was formed with if you wanna have some sleepless nights, to become the director of an institute, his mandate is to reignite European Jewish culture. Annaly traveled around Europe to try to recruit some participants, some students for this new institute, which was going to reignite European Jewish. We gave them train tickets, euro euro rail tickets, and said, go out.
Do this. And they did. But as well, I traveled all around Europe. Oh, actually, I don't know why we lost all of it. Anyway, all of oh, there we go.
People showed up from all sorts of countries, but there was something unusual about these people. And who are the who came to the institute? We began to call them the disc assimilators. Not only are these remarkable, this diss diss diss assimilating generation of people who know white why they're Jewish and have become literate. In 2014, I'm only happy you were part of this group, the Glamsted Declaration.
We are a group of activists, thinkers, and artists united by a commitment to the renewal of Jewish life and culture in Europe. In recent years, matters relating to antisemitism, the Shewan state Of Israel, come to define Jewish interaction with the larger European community. We strongly believe, in particular, that Jewish thought and experience can make important contributions to the ongoing endeavor for a more just and democratic year. Jewish thought and experience have important insights to contribute to the European Jewish community. Jewish communities can provide a model for minority citizenship based on the principles of integration without assimilation, and this is where the cheers came.
Last, not not not least, we believe that Jewish thought can contribute to European Jewish values by providing examples of how universalizing claims are constantly examined with the multiplicity of voices. Why? Why did this make me cry?
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Jewish crime statistics have been historically covered up and continues to this day
@VyprCEO - Khaled 𐌔𐌔oliman
The only ethnic group where crimes don't count, LITERALLY. https://t.co/mKRYj8XagZ
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Jewish crimes against the nations and making them collapsed Blood libel Spreading Heresy in god Rejecting god Usury Etc…
@VyprCEO - Khaled 𐌔𐌔oliman
From the U.S. Department of Justice: jews, despite being the lowest in population, commit the most white-collar crimes (e.g. fraud, embezzlement, insider trading, money laundering, bribery, cyber scams, etc). jewish crimes are then entered as “White” crimes in the statistical data. They often escape their crimes and take a one-way flight to israel. But if by any chance they are captured and go to prison, they are placed in a special prison with a fully kosher kitchen and receive special amenities reserved for jews. They eat and live as if it's a 5-star hotel.
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Work camps list of amenities
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
Concentration camp amenities during WW2 1. Orchestras and musical performances 2. Soccer fields and sports facilities 3. Swimming pools 4. Brothels 5. Libraries 6. Art classes and workshops 7. Theaters for plays and films 8. Post offices 9. Canteens for purchasing goods https://t.co/yzoAHr1ssP
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn How the fabrication of the German holocaust was imbedded into humanity
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn J3ws spread fake and false stories about what happened to them. Always playing a character: The Victim
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn The story about j3ws being made of soap and lampshades is a total fabrication and lie. But they still promote it TODAY. https://t.co/RFb2Zq1KKB
Video Transcript AI Summary
In never again. Never again will one and a half million Jewish children be turned into soap and ash and lampshades. Never again.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In never again. Never again will one and a half million Jewish children be turned into soap and ash and lampshades. Never again.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Father: My son, the bar mitzvah boy. How's the Haftarah studying coming?
Theodore: Tears good.
Father: Something that matter, Theodore?
Theodore: Can I ask you a weird question?
Father: Sure.
Theodore: Do you think somebody could kidnap a kid and keep him underground? I'd get involved.
Father: Underground? What is wrong with you?
Theodore: Yeah, just keep him there in the sewers for months and months hurting him or I don't know. Have you ever heard of something like that?
Father: Your grandparents escaped Buchenwald. Their entire families murdered. The skin of Jewish prisoners used for lampshades. What? Lampshades.
We are Jews, Theodore. We know better than anyone the real horrors of this world. Reality is terrifying enough as it is. Cut it up with the fantasy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My son, the bar mitzvah boy. How's the Haftarah studying coming?
Speaker 1: Tears good.
Speaker 0: Something that matter, Theodore?
Speaker 1: Can I ask you a weird question?
Speaker 0: Sure.
Speaker 1: Do you think somebody could kidnap a kid and keep him underground? I'd get involved.
Speaker 0: Underground? What is wrong with you?
Speaker 1: Yeah, just keep him there in the sewers for months and months hurting him or I don't know. Have you ever heard of something like that?
Speaker 0: Your grandparents escaped Buchenwald. Their entire families murdered. The skin of Jewish prisoners used for lampshades. What? Lampshades.
We are Jews, Theodore. We know better than anyone the real horrors of this world. Reality is terrifying enough as it is. Cut it up with the fantasy.
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
These fake shrunken heads and “lampshades” made of Jews were used as atrocity propaganda at the end of WW2. They are still considered “real” by established authorities, but are simply used to extrapolate reparations from White countries to support a country that shouldn’t exist.
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Germans was the most advanced nation. And had developed gasses that were deadly but never utilized. J3ws actually think you’re stupid enough to fool and be lied to.
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn The German holocaust main points debunked here:
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Fake German holocaust was always wartime propaganda
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn The alleged gases the jews suffered from the”holocaust” 🤣
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Cracking the enigma code reveals the fabrication of the German holocaust Fact: it also allowed for the political jews in America influence the president to let Japan attack pearl harbor
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Lets go swimming in the 1930s
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Facts against the fake holocaust
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Rare pictures of the “holocaust” Clearly displays how degenerate some of the j3ws were
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Why did the j3ws embed the fake holocaust narrative into American k-12 classes? To brainwash, deceit, subvert history to the advantage
@GoUncensored - Uncensored.AI
Why did the McGraw Hill textbooks lie to us about World War 2? https://t.co/dfisWLjTOr
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn J3ws turned the holocaust narrative denial ILLEGAL in many countries’s justice systems
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn J3wish holocaust denial laws
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn ✡️s war against Germans and their propaganda started well before WW1 & WW2
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Examined bodies and gas murders never happened
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
Dr Charles Larson performed over 1k autopsies in German Concentration camps after the end of the War. Not one victim was documented as killed by “gassing.” Not one. https://t.co/mXiYDXsH9S
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn ✡️s sensationalism and exaggeration through propaganda and their fake survival stories
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
Here are some disinfection chambers from Dachau…. Where they would use Zyklon b to gas the prisoners clothing and to prevent the spread of infection… Why would you delouse the clothing if you were just gonna kill them all?? 🧐 This was the real use of Zkylon B by the way, and matches up with the actual amounts ordered and the chemical evidence within the walls of various concentration camps…
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Work camps had doctors and health check ups Highlights of the fake ✡️ holocaust ✡️s are psychological and deceivers
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn The fake Holocaust exaggerations that have fooled Christian Americans for decades now
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Jewish construct: inflation through numbers
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn No “final solution” order ever existed
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Every jewish senior is a survivor 🤣🤣🤣🤡🌎✡️👺
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Jews sent their own to the work camps to steal their wealth to begin a zionist political plan to create the terrorist state of Israel
@TheOfficial1984 - 1984
The jews sent their own to the camps. Ben Gurion made a deal with Eichmann. jews needed money. Germany needed workers. Ben Gurion stole the wealth of thousands of Hungarian jews and put them on the train. Then used it to build the biblical nation state of Israel. https://t.co/GYQVjmJ5kX
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Work camp deaths had a paper trail
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Hitler refused to use gas The gas chambers are a fabrication and a lie created by jews
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Hitler never utilized gases at his disposal
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Lets add x rays to ensure no broken bones in the work camps Jews are allergic to physical labor and work in general. Their wealth is earned by unnatural and exploitative methods https://t.co/VhkzroEfeQ
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Treblinka Jews cover their fake non existent dead jews with cement so no one ever discovers the truth
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Rockwell and holocaust number
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn 26 million 🤣
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn The real jew is a nomad He has nothing but destruction and wickedness
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn David irving offer money for proof of a holocaust Money has NEVER been collected
reSee.it AI Summary
I claim there was no order from Hitler to kill Jews, no conclusive evidence of gassing, and no verified mass graves or ash piles. I note Allied reports of death camps are disputed, Polish gas-chamber displays are recreations, and the Red Cross reportedly found camps not used for mass execution. I credit revisionists and some scientists, recall alleged Nuremberg torture, and mention camps with wards, fields, and pools; cremation times are questioned.
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
Uncomfortable facts about the “Holocaust.” -There is no order from Hitler to kill the jews -there is no chemical evidence anyone was ever gassed to death -the allies never uncovered one “death camp” -the polish government admitted that their “gas chambers” on display are recreations… -there was never any “gassed bodies” found -There was never any piles of ash or mass graves found -the allies had broken the enigma code of the Germans, and never heard a word about any “Holocaust.” -the Red Cross visited the camps and stated they were “not used for mass execution.” -Paul Rassinier was a French communist inside an actual concentration camp, and claimed the “official story” was bogus - many holocaust revisionist are not “Nazis” but chemist and modern scientist who can simply see through the atrocity propaganda. (Germar Rudolf - Max Planck chemist, Arthur Butz- MIT graduate. - the people who “admitted” to a holocaust were tortured at Nuremberg -there were maternity wards, soccer fields and swimming pools in concentration camps because they were work camps not death camps. -it takes 2 to 3 hours to cremate a body, the idea that millions were quickly cremated is laughable. -the supposed gas chambers at Auschwitz has a wooden door and would kill all of the operators if actually used…
