reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Jasonlo19809025
Posted - November 10, 2020 at 5:59 AM
Saved - August 21, 2024 at 11:26 PM

@Jasonlo19809025 - Jason lopez

Is this what's hot now on Fox News? American citizens being mocked by Sandra Smith for questioning the results of the election? There are so many claims of fraud including dead voters and fake ballots that one would have to be silly to at least not *think* that there is something https://t.co/dKRVLSPICk

Video Transcript AI Summary
Regardless of who becomes president, media declarations alone do not determine the presidency. It's important to ensure the process is proper and legal. Trump's Trace was recalled, and all concerns warrant investigation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Over whoever is decided to be the president, remember, just because CNN says or even Fox News says that somebody's president doesn't make them president. So I think everybody wants to know that this was done properly and legally. What is happening? Trump's Trace recalled it. And I think we have to look into every one of these concerns. Yeah. And I think yeah. And I think Felida makes a very good point there, Steve. You know?
CodeMonkeyZ
Posted - November 19, 2020 at 7:18 AM
Saved - March 18, 2023 at 7:01 AM

@CodeMonkeyZ - Ron

Did they realize that certifying voter fraud in a federal election has way more repercussions than being called a racist? https://t.co/oetvsI8SZO

listen_2learn
Posted - November 8, 2022 at 3:57 PM
Saved - December 25, 2023 at 10:15 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A thread shares clips from a conference discussing alleged rigging in the 2016 election. The author suggests that the experts involved may have influenced the 2020 election as well. Another post criticizes Hillary Clinton for denying election results and promoting conspiracy theories.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

Thread with clips from a conference on how the 2016 election was rigged. How would you hack a presidential election? I’m guessing these partisan election experts had a hand in the 2020 election because they disappeared afterwards, but they will soon be back. https://t.co/pDHfioOBV8

Video Transcript AI Summary
To hack a US presidential election, the speaker suggests a four-step plan. First, use pre-election polls to identify closely contested states. Second, target large counties or their service providers and compromise their election management system computers. Third, infect individual voting machines using the compromised system. This can be done easily by purchasing a government surplus machine on Ebay. Finally, manipulate the votes on the computer, knowing that most states discard the paper ballots without checking them.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How would you actually hack a US presidential election? Well, step 1, before the election, use pre election polls like Nate Silver provides to identify the states that are likely to be closest, that are going to be within a percent or so. Step 2, target some large counties or their service providers and compromise their election management system computers. I'll leave it as an exercise to the attacker to find out, how to compromise the election management system by, say, starting by emailing Sue. Step 3, use the compromised election management system to spread your infection to the individual voting machines. Developing an attack for one of these machines is not terribly difficult. I and others have done it again and again in the laboratory. All you need to do is buy 1 government surplus on Ebay to test it out. Finally, step 4, you're a tax steals votes on the computer, but no one ever looks at the paper because as we'll show you, most states just throw away that paper without ever looking at it.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

By December 13, 2016, if there was fraud, it had to be exposed by this date in order to have any hope of changing the outcome of the election. Hillary Clinton. Election denier and conspiracy theorist. https://t.co/ZAna9mQC0s

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2016, it was known that hacking could occur during the presidential election. The election results were surprisingly close compared to the polls, indicating possible interference. However, no US states examined enough paper ballots to determine if the computers were hacked. This revealed a significant gap in our system. With a deadline approaching for states to finalize their electoral college votes, there was a need to expose any fraud that may have occurred. Election integrity advocates struggled to find a solution to ensure the examination of physical evidence that could detect cyber attacks.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So coming back to 2016 and the presidential election, we knew on November on November 8th, excuse me, not December 8th, on November 8th, on Election Day, that hacking was possible, and at the end of the day when the election results came in, we saw that the result was extremely close, was surprising compared to the polling. We knew at that point that there had been cyberattacks of an unprecedented nature in American politics aimed previously at interfering with the election. This was all before Election Day, and we knew that it was feasible for an attacker to change votes on enough machines to have stolen the election result. Shockingly, at least shockingly to me and many other people, even under these circumstances, approximately 0 US states we're going to look at enough paper ballots to know whether the computers had been hacked. This is a major gap in our system. I previously had believed that the paper would provide a fairly strong deterrent, but if even in 2016 we're not going to look at any of the paper, well, it might as well not be there. So at this point, there were 5 weeks between Election Day on November 8th and December 13th, which is a deadline under federal law for states to lock in their electoral college votes, if there was no, if there was fraud that had taken place, it had to be exposed by this date in order to have any hope of changing the outcome of the election. So what to do under these circumstances? I and other election integrity advocates got together and started discussing some possibilities, but we didn't really have a good solution. Was there any way possible to make the states actually examine the physical evidence they had in a way that could potentially detect a cyber attack.
KanekoaTheGreat
Posted - January 8, 2023 at 9:56 PM
Saved - June 4, 2023 at 9:05 AM

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

Hacking America's Election System 1 hour of computer scientists, election security experts, and Senate Democrats talking about how easy it is to hack voting machines. @KariLake @katiehobbs @GenFlynn @realMikeLindell @bgmasters @PatrickByrne @JackPosobiec @DavidSacks @elonmusk https://t.co/sH4Ft0iMsB

Video Transcript AI Summary
Voting machines in the US are vulnerable to hacking and manipulation, according to researchers. These machines, which come in various models, have been found to have security vulnerabilities that allow attackers to inject malicious software and change election data. The machines can be hacked through the machine used to program them, and many of them have wireless modems that can connect to the internet, despite claims that they are not connected. The vulnerabilities in the voting machines, along with the lack of secure systems for voter registration and result reporting, pose a significant risk to the integrity of elections. It is crucial to address these vulnerabilities to ensure the trustworthiness of election results.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know America's voting machines are vulnerable because my colleagues and I have hacked them repeatedly. We've created attacks that can spread from machine to machine like a computer virus, and silently change election outcomes, and in every single case We've found ways for attackers to sabotage machines and to steal votes. Across the country, there are about 52 different models of machines. They they fall into essentially 2 styles. Ones that scan a piece of paper or ones where the vote, the voter just interacts with the touch screen. And many of them have been analyzed now by researchers, looking for security vulnerabilities. In every single case where a US voting machine has been analyzed by competent security researchers, They have found vulnerabilities that would let someone inject malicious software and change election data. Every single case. Speaker 1: The better or the more efficient way of hacking machines would be to subvert them all through the machine that's used to actually program those machines. So prior to each election, the county election office or the voting machine vendor will actually program memory cards for that election. It tells the machine who are the candidates, what are the, you know, the the contests being decided, and that gets It's inserted into the voting machine. If you can alter, if you can subvert that machine that is used to program those memory cards, then you can pass rogue software to the voting machine. Speaker 0: Voting machines that are not connected to the internet. This is something that you hear all the time in the US from election officials. Unfortunately, it's not actually true. Many new voting machines that come with 4 gs wireless modems so that they can be connected to the internet from the polling place in order to upload the results faster. Now to me, that sounds crazy. Why would you want to put your voting machines on the Internet right in the middle of the election, potentially at the most vulnerable Speaker 2: time. Studies conducted in 2007 by the state of California, state of Ohio, state of Florida found security vulnerabilities that could take advantage of these To engineer viruses where 1 compromised voting machine could then infect eventually the entire fleet of machines for an entire county. Typically at the end of the election day, you move a memory card through each of the machines in the precinct, and that's to collect the vote totals. That process can spread a virus. And there are other processes. The details vary from machine to machine. Speaker 3: When you say hacked, what were they able to do once they gained access to the machines? Speaker 4: All sorts of Executally manipulate the outcome of the vote. They could manipulate the tally. They could delete the tally, and and they could compromise the vote in any number of ways. Speaker 5: The machines used in Georgia have been demonstrated to be hackable through a virus that's carried on ballot definition cartridges. Very much like this Duxnet virus was inserted into nuclear centrifuges in Iran. Speaker 3: There are a number of states that outsource their reporting of elections to third parties, some of which are corporations based in other countries like Spain. So you've got to trust that the aggregation of the votes and the reporting of the votes is accurate as well. Speaker 0: I'm pretty sure my undergrad computer security class at Michigan could have changed the outcome of the 2016 teen Michigan election if we wanted to. It is that bad. And we have a combination of very powerful adversaries, and unfortunately quite vulnerable and obsolete systems. That's that's why I say it's only a matter of time. Speaker 6: Unfortunately, in a lot of these systems, The audit trails are just as vulnerable as the other aspects of the system. So there may not be good forensic evidence of a successful intrusion. With the current design, we cannot be universally confident that it hasn't happened. And it's probably only a matter of time before it will. Speaker 7: I come here today as a computer scientist who spent the better part of the last quarter century studying Election system security. As you're well aware, the integrity of elections across the US depends heavily on the integrity of computers and Software systems. Unfortunately, much of this infrastructure has proven dangerously vulnerable to tampering and attack, and in some cases, In ways that cannot be easily detected or corrected, after the fact. These vulnerabilities can create practical avenues for, corrupt candidates or foreign adversaries to do everything from cause large scale disruption on Election Day to potentially, undetectably alter, election outcomes in some cases. So let me begin with the voting equipment itself. To be blunt, it's a widely recognized, really indisputable fact that every piece of computerized voting equipment in use at polling places today Can be easily compromised, in ways that have the potential to disrupt election, operations, compromise firmware and software, Potentially alter, vote tallies in the absence of, other safeguards. This is partly a consequence of historically poor design and implementation by equipment vendors, but it's ultimately a reflection of the nature of complex software. It's simply beyond the state of the art, to build software systems that can reliably withstand targeted attack By a determined adversary in this kind of an environment. The vulnerabilities are real. They're serious. And absent a surprising and very fundamental break through in my field, which I would welcome, but I don't see coming, soon, probably inevitable. We give most of the attention to vulnerabilities in voting machines, But that's not the whole story. Each of the more than 5,000 jurisdictions responsible for running elections across the nation Must maintain a number of critical information systems that are attractive targets for disruption by adversaries. Most important of these are voter registration databases, the systems that report, final results, and so forth. Unfortunately, There are even fewer standards for how to secure these systems. The administration of these systems varies widely. And the threats against these systems are often even more, acute than the threats against individual voting systems. You know, just as we don't expect the local sheriff to single handedly defend against military ground invasions, we shouldn't expect county election IT managers to defend against cyber attacks by foreign intelligence services, but that's precisely what we've been asking them, to do. Speaker 0: I'm a professor of computer science and have spent the last 10 years studying the electronic voting systems that our nation relies on. My conclusion from that work is that our highly computerized election infrastructure that is vulnerable to sabotage, and even to cyber attacks that could change votes. These realities risk making our election results more difficult for the American people to trust. I know America's voting machines are vulnerable because my colleagues and I have hacked them repeatedly, as part of a decade of research, studying the technology that operates elections and learning how to make it stronger. We've created attacks that can spread from machine to machine, like a computer virus, and silently change election outcomes. We've studied touch screen and optical scan systems, and in every single case we've found ways for attackers to sabotage machines and to steal votes. These capabilities are certainly within reach for America's enemies. As you know, states choose their own voting technology. And while some states are doing well with security, others are alarmingly vulnerable. This puts the entire nation at risk. In close elections, an attacker can probe the most important swing states or swing counties, find areas with the weakest protection, and strike there. In a close election year changing a few votes in key, localities could be enough to tip national results. The key lesson from 2016 is that these threats are real. Some say the fact that voting machines aren't directly connected to the Internet makes them secure, but unfortunately this is not true. Voting machines are not as distant from the Internet as they may seem. So the way these attacks work Is that before every election, every voting machine needs to be programmed with the design of the ballot, the names of the races and candidates. And voting officials do that by inserting a memory card into the machine. If an attacker can infect that memory card With malicious code, well, when the memory card is inserted into the machine, it can change the programming running on the voting machine And caused the voting machine to, at the end of the election, output whatever results the attacker wants. Speaker 5: The machine that I hacked is called the Sequoia AVC Advantage, now called the Dominion AVC Advantage. It's in The computer program that counts the votes on this machine is in a read only memory that's mounted in a socket on the motherboard. To hack this machine, you have to Remove that memory chip from its socket and install a memory chip, on which you've prepared a cheating program. The cheating program that I prepared, has an extra 100 lines of code basically that, when the polls are about to close, it goes in there and changes some votes stored in the machine. And there is an electronic log of all votes cast, so it changes the log too. So to install that, the attacker doesn't need to be a computer scientist, the attacker just needs to have A bunch of copies of this memory chip, with the fraudulent program on it. And for each voting machine, unscrew 10 screws to remove the panel that that covers the motherboard, pry out the ROM chip containing the legitimate program and install the ROM chip containing the fraudulent program. Other kinds of voting machines store their computer program that counts to votes in flash memory. And this can be updated Under the control of whatever computer program happens to be running in the voting machine. These voting machines, typically the generation developed in the 1990s and after, can be hacked without actually physically changing any hardware in the machine, just by installing a software upgrade Memory card in the same slot that one would normally install the ballot definition. And this particular attack was demonstrated by my colleague at Princeton, Professor Felton, In about 2007, working with 2 of his graduate students. But it's not just us at Princeton, there are many kinds of voting machines and The same kinds of hacks are applicable to all voting machines and have been demonstrated at several other universities, including University of Connecticut, Johns Hopkins, Michigan and others. There are cyber security issues in all parts of our election system. Before the election, voter registration databases. During the election, voting machines. After the election, vote tabulation, canvassing, precinct aggregation computers. Installing new software in a voting machine is not really much different from installing new software in any other kind of computer. Installing new software is how you hack a voting machine to cheat. In 2009, in the courtroom of the Superior Court of New Jersey, I demonstrated how to hack a voting machine. I wrote a vote stealing computer program that shifts votes from 1 candidate to another. Installing that vote stealing program in a voting machine takes 7 minutes per machine with a screwdriver. But really the software I built was not rocket science. Any computer programmer could write the same code. Once it's installed, it could steal elections without detection for years to come. Voting machines are often delivered to polling places several days before the election, to elementary schools, churches, firehouses. In these locations, anyone could gain access to a voting machine for 10 minutes. Between elections, the machines are routinely opened up for maintenance by county employees or private contractors. Let's assume they have the utmost integrity. But still in the US we try to run our elections so that we can trust the election results without relying on any one individual. Other computer scientists have demonstrated similar hacks on many models of machine. This is not just 1 glitch in 1 manufacturer's machine. It's the very nature of computers. So how can we trust our elections when it's so easy to make the computers cheat? Speaker 8: Mr. Appel, in that scenario, an attacker would actually have to have access to all 100 in the 1 county in order to manipulate the records. Speaker 5: In Georgia, that's not the case. The machines used in Georgia Have been demonstrated to be hackable through a virus that's carried on ballot definition cartridges, very much like this Stuxnet virus was, inserted into nuclear centrifuges in Iran. So, and in Speaker 8: that auditing system, in the auditing of these machines. We look at that. Is that correct? Speaker 5: I'm sorry. Can you repeat the question? Speaker 8: So, in those machines that have that vulnerability in the auditing process. Isn't that scanned? Don't we scan for that? Speaker 5: It's difficult to scan for that vulnerability in the sense of if you Ask a machine to report what software is loaded in it. If it's fraudulent software, it will lie. So, the AccuVote TS machines, used in Georgia and in a few counties in other states are particularly vulnerable to this kind of virus that can be carried to the machines even if the criminal attacker doesn't touch the machines or is not even in the same state with the machines. Cap. Speaker 9: With parts made all over the world, and software made all over the world, and as Sherry said, there's only 3 or 4 manufacturers, the the one core point That kind of election security experts and others have been making about why our votes are safe was that the decentralized nature of our, Voting systems, the thousands and thousands of of, voting offices around the country that administer the election is what kept safe because Russians would need to have tens of thousands of operatives go get physical access to machines to actually, infiltrate the election. We now know that's false. And that through a handful of simple attacks, into manufacturers not in the United States, The Russians could plant malware into, thousands of machines all at once and hack the entire U. S. Election without ever leaving the Kremlin. Speaker 10: Or is there a different way where you could just hack one machine and that would transmit a bug to other machines in the precinct, again, even though they're not connected to an internet. Speaker 2: Sure. So before we had an Internet, we had computers with floppy drives. And there were computer viruses that could spread from 1 computer to another over floppies. Electronic voting machines, some of them use memory cards, some of them have these big battery packs, some of them have local area networks. Studies conducted in 2007 by the state of California, state of Ohio, state of Florida found security vulnerabilities that could take advantage of these to engineer viruses where 1 compromised voting machine could then infect eventually the entire fleet of machines for an entire county. And Each of these studies found ways that regular poll workers and election officials going through their standard procedures and and standard operations Could unwittingly be used to transmit viruses from 1 machine to another through the motion. Typically at the end of the election day, you move a memory card through each of the machines in the precinct, and that's to collect the vote totals. That process can spread a virus. And there are other processes. The details vary from machine to machine. Speaker 10: Okay. So it's accurate to say that just because something is not connected to the internet, it does not have a vulnerability to cyber attack. Speaker 2: Being disconnected from the Internet helps, but it's not a panacea, okay? Speaker 11: When you and your colleagues hacked election systems, did you get caught? Speaker 0: We hacked, election systems as part of academic research where we had machines in our system. Did you get caught? Speaker 11: Did they did they see your intrusion into their systems? Speaker 0: The one instance when I was invited to hack a real voting system to while people were watching, was in Washington, D. C. In 2010, and in that instance it took less than 48 hours for us to change all the votes, and we were not caught. Speaker 11: Vice, Chairman. Speaker 0: I have sitting in my office right now actually, a deep old AccuVote TSX machine, a touchscreen machine that's still in use in 23 states, where, I've hacked it to give whatever outcome I want. It it really is that easy. And when you're talking about, when you're talking about these attacks, though, I don't think it's something that, You know, just in every case, a, a freshman in college could do it. Some states are a little bit better protected, but that's not who we're up against. We're up against nation state attackers that are among some of the most Powerful, adversaries in the world when it comes to cyber attacks, and which have routinely compromised highly protected sites like, like military installations, and large tech companies. I think that's the thing that I want voting officials and and voters to understand is quite what they're up against. And we have a combination of very powerful adversaries and series, and unfortunately quite vulnerable and obsolete systems. That's why I say it's only a matter of time. Speaker 3: The standard arguments that, our elections can't be hacked in the US are some combination of physical security. You can't get access to the devices, they're not connected to the internet, they're tested before Election Day, and the system is too decentralized. It's run by, you know, a bunch of individual election officials and individual counties and and jurisdictions. So it's it's a it's a hard target. Most of this has already been debunked by, the previous speakers, but, physical security is pretty lax. Equipment, has sleepovers in school gymnasiums, and churches, and this and that. There are lots of, examples on the Internet of photos of, election, equipment warehouses, where the the Election officials warehouses with the door propped open and nobody watching. Just, it's just not true. It isn't true that the machines aren't connected to the Internet, and even if they weren't to the Internet that would still be hackable through other means. One of the things that hasn't been mentioned so far yet is supply chain hacks. There are components in these voting systems that come from foreign countries. A colleague of ours, Karsten Sherman, at the IT University of Copenhagen, Found Chinese pop songs in memory of a voting machine that he bought, on the Internet. So that those songs somehow made it through the quality control of The election equipment vendor, and then through, how many elections that it was actually used in by the local election official, and, and, you know, we're still there. Moreover, there's an issue in reporting, which I'm not going to talk about that much, but there are a number of states that outsource their reporting of elections to third parties, some of which are corporations based in other countries like Spain. So you've got to trust that the aggregation of the votes and the reporting of the votes is is, is accurate as well. There's a lot of technology being rolled out in this election, that had either not been used or not been used as widely before. This includes, much more widespread reliance on things like electronic poll books, which become a point of vulnerability that can disenfranchise people if they malfunction, if they lose their Internet connection, or if they've been hacked, some jurisdictions are relying on uploading election results using cellular modems or, the internet That, of course, introduces another point of vulnerability, not just to the data that's flowing, but also to the software, the devices that, that are being connected. Voting equipment itself, there are states that have rolled out touchscreen voting for all in person voters. This is, An unnecessary introduction of brittle and vulnerable technology. Many pieces of electronic technology that are involved in elections are Either incorporate, devices that were built overseas, or assembled overseas, and many crucial functions are being outsourced to foreign companies. One, noteworthy example that I'm especially concerned about, there is a Spanish firm, called CITL, which runs, they they provide election reporting for something like 11 US states. They're based in Spain, and they're bankrupt. So that could, obviously, is a point of failure where, someone could shed a lot of mistrust over the election results By simply falsifying what gets posted, even if the correct results could ultimately be recovered from durable reliable records, that would certainly, cast a lot of fear uncertainty and doubt on what's going on. There have been ransomware attacks on, government systems now including some voting systems, We know that there are cyber warfare attacks by Russia, China, Iran and North Korea. There most states voter registration databases were, penetrated in 2016, there is a lot of evidence that data were changed, but that could certainly happen this time around. So all in all, there's a lot of confusion, there are a lot of points of vulnerability. There are a lot of known problems. There are some election vendors who have been hacked, before 2016. VR systems was hacked in Florida. Some of their clients were, there were phishing attacks against them this time, around, let's see, I forgot my name of it. Tyler Technologies, which provides some, vote by mail ballot, tracking and some vote aggregation reporting has also been hacked. So overall, there's an awful lot that can go wrong. Speaker 12: He saw no evidence of, Tampering with, no, voter voting machines or voter tallies. That's not true. It didn't happen. We just didn't see the evidence of it. Speaker 13: Well, there has been never a documented incident when votes have been changed during the real election. And my answer was please continue using these machines and that will remain to be true forever, Because these machines don't have a capability of providing you forensic evidence to see if they cannot prove they were honest, they cannot prove that they were have been hacked. They simply don't have the fundamental basic capabilities of providing you that forensic evidence, that data. Only way you can see that that machine was hacked if the attacker wanted to be found that it was hacked. That's a sad truth. So Anyone who says I have a information one way or another, that's an opinion. That's not fact based. Fact is, it can be done without leaving trace. Speaker 14: When you know how the system for looking for the evidence, you know that you won't find it because the systems are not recording, Generating, preserving or protecting meaningful forensic evidence. And this is from the very beginning to the end of the process everywhere. These systems really don't have a capability of recording and protecting any meaningful audit information or forensically important information. So a lot of times I would also argue that even if you try to take a look into the into the evidence, the problem is that there is no Evidence which is trustworthy and and worth on a lot. Even recently, a case where a voting machine was reporting, and I believe that was in the last year in North voting machine was in the race where they had 50,000 votes cast, was cast reporting to 1 candidate 164 or something like that votes. And when the paper was looped, that person actually get 26,000 vote and vote by 1 by 1,000 votes. Speaker 12: Wow. Speaker 14: So we we really need to have that paper ballot. There's nothing we don't have a technology to do electronic voltage. The problem the most most Driving thing is, first of all, from 2006 to now is nothing changed. The actual same version of software I hacked 2005 is still in use. It's those machines are still in 20 states. Mhmm. So they're still around. Even the so called new sold today is In the end of life version of of Windows, etcetera, like, just something which no other industry would be acceptable, would be remotely acceptable. So I think the most as overall, it is how outdated everything is And and how hard it is to make people to understand the the reality and and get the warning through that this needs to be fixed or things will get really, really worse, turn the worse. They're bad right now, but and I cannot even Cannot imagine what the worst would be looking like. Parties, they are not actually but a lot of these voting machines are not US origin. And I'm not only talking about the components being made in China or a voting machine being assembled in in Philippines, but also the very of the machine, the programming. In many many many voting machines, that programming, either whole or in the large part is Coming from a foreign from code sources. And it seems to be the case that actually the voting machine vendors, Generally speaking, either don't know or they refuse to tell the truth where the code actually comes. And it turned out that the system he is using exactly the same system which created this magnitude 16,022 votes in Volusia County for Al Gore. So I took a look into the system, figured out a couple of ways to manipulate the central tabulator. But I told I on this well, this is not elegant. You leave a audit trail. You leave a evidence, the bet bet, breadcrumbles. You can trace it. I was asked, well, if there what is the elegant way? So I have I don't know if there's 1. But if if there is, it's gotta be this memory card. Speaker 15: So it's so it's a memory card that fits into the voting machine that you found could be the more or less untraceable or hard to trace way to manipulate the results, whereas they were thinking it was something in the machine. You thought this was attack because you would see a ton of evidence and, like you said, breadcrumbs being left by the tampering party. Speaker 14: Well, it's it's no. It's if not even that. I was just Thinking about the architecture of the system. And with that architecture, it made sense that there's executable program in the memory card. And I was quickly told that that's impossible because it's against the certified rules. But, also, the vendor was dishonest about the origin of the card. So, well, if they are not Honest about one thing they're probably not honest about. The second thing, I found an executable program on a memory card. I found it's it's completely unprotected. This This memory card is so old. It's older than floppy drive. So it actually, I found it because I was I remember that I have seen it before floppy drives existed. So that's what I found who was the original manufacturer of it. And a, interesting The thing about this explanation afterwards was that demand 16,000 was malfunction Of the memory card, that's the, that's the reason why it happened. Not possible. That reason why it's not possible is that that memory card Doesn't know how to make negative numbers. So whatever caused that man respond 16,000 votes, which we don't know what caused it. At least the official explanation given at the time, not possible. Something else happened. Speaker 1: So everyone was focused in 2000 on the punch card machines and the problems that that brought. But in Fallucia County, there was an incident that occurred. It didn't A lot of attention. And the attention that it did get sort of disappeared and got lost in all of the focus on the punch card machines. What happened in Volusia County was around At 10 p. M. Midnight or sorry, 10 p. M. On election night. Prior to that, Al Gore in Volusia County was ahead of George Bush. But around 10 p. M, suddenly, Al Gore's number started reversing. And it reversed more than 16,000 votes. And in There aren't, it was all happening in 1 precinct, and of course, there weren't 16,000 voters in that 1 precinct. So Gore's numbers were actually showing a negative 16,000 in that precinct. And the explanation that election officials provided was that, a faulty memory card was inserted into the tabulating machine. Now, it wasn't, the, let's say, legitimate memory card. So there was 1 memory card for this precinct, and it was uploaded to a tabulator on election night. But the logs show that an hour after that memory card was uploaded, another 2nd memory card for that same precinct was uploaded. And after that 2nd card was uploaded, that's when the votes for Gore started disappearing. And no one has been able to explain what exactly happened with that, whether that was a rogue card that was intentionally designed to hack the votes and misfired and therefore, Erased too many votes for Gore or whether this was, you know, a software mishap. But no one has explained why 2 memory cards for the same precinct were uploaded. And that's that's sort of the main problem in terms of chains of custody, the fact that a second memory card was actually ever able to be uploaded. Speaker 6: And John Kerry has expressed misgivings about the 2004 vote in Ohio. Speaker 1: Yes. So they had concerns about the machines in Ohio. Ohio was still largely using punch card machines. They hadn't replaced theirs yet. But there were still counties there were counties that were already using optical scan machines and also paperless DRE machines. And he and his group, he revealed this only recently, actually went to court court to try and obtain the algorithms, the software, to look at the software to make sure that it would be counting votes accurately. And the courts denied access to it because the proprietary software on voting machines is considered a trade secret. And so the private voting machine companies go to court to fight against this, and the courts generally agree with them. Speaker 14: When I and others, when we 2005, 2006 got involved And up until 2008, we all thought now when the problem has been exposed, it will be fixed very quickly. It would it was completely Always incomprehensible for me and and other secretary researchers that now 2020, we are talking about this topic. And, also, we are 2020 using the same machines with the same software. It's just you wouldn't be using a a 30 year old PC with with no security patches, But that's exactly how the elections are conducted. Let's talk about everything in the world how this works. Speaker 16: Okay. Speaker 17: So Speaker 14: you have a voting message, a voting terminal. That's how you pass your ballot, either electronically or paper ballot, it's go scanning. And after that, these machines are reporting those results Very often, our our communication lies through the central tabulator. Now in both in the county level, or or state level, where the votes are accumulated in database, and along the path, there are number of data storage, systems databases. And if you manipulate those, you can create an illusion of a different results. And you can even do it in the about election reporting system. So instead of even hacking anything in the tabulator system, you are just creating wrong reporting. So there are a number of ways how you can, through this whole path, influence the results. And we have to actually step even further back, Steph, because if we look the election as whole, it's a myriad of system. We have voter registration system. Them. We have electronic poll book systems. We have the election management. We have the ballot casting. We have the tabulation, and we have the reporting. Any of these, if you have one of these, you can always have the result. You can disenfranchise voters so they can cast their ballot. You can change the the outcome. You can change the reporting. Each of these needs to be secured. None of these is less important than the others. And that's why we have been I think in the public mind, we have been focusing in a very narrow area, Which is you cast a ballot on how the ballot is counted, but not missing the whole big picture. How many other systems from a adversary, how from from ethical's point of view, where the other can go and achieve the same goal. How about the Internet? It really it's everything is connected to Internet either directly or indirectly. And the more modern voting machines, they actually have a mobile phone Modem, in to speak, they have a they have a mobile phone mobile phone connectivity to county headquarters. They are sending the results. So wireless is coming back to the voting message in the newer generations. Nice marketing material trying to tell it's not, but it is. A journalist in a year ago, she found 200 voting machines in the Internet. Voting machine vendors say, well, they are not in Internet because they are not pingable. My answer to that is, are you from the past? Because since since 15 years ago, nothing is really anymore pingable, And they are still connected to Internet. It's the the whole argument is 15 that argument was to have been meaning something 15 years ago. It doesn't mean anything today. And, again, I I was just came from Atlanta, and and they have new working machines because the judge ordered the old ones to be scrapped. And part of the things in the the judge's ruling was that, The finding was that the voting machine were programmed by basically 3 guys from their homes and who sent all the programming of the voting machine for next hours and over Internet to We distribute all the machines. Speaker 15: Oh, so these guys had programmed the machines from home, and then they they pushed the code update to the voting machines via the Internet. Speaker 14: We what they said but they pushed it to the state, and then the state pushed it to the counties. And, actually, this whole thing about, the critical election specific programming going over Internet is very common because lot of this programming is done by private companies, third party management companies. And it's, it has been shocking the last 2 years when I have been working for a number of secretaries of state And looking how the security has done in their state just to find that email, FTP with no security. These are the common methods to send the most mission critical programming from the private company, which might be out of state, to the local county who is putting it into the machines. It is whoever controls that data controls the election. Speaker 15: And these machines, they like you said, they have network cards. You show in Kill Chain, again, the documentary that we'll link in the show notes, that they have USB ports. They have memory card slots. They have modems and phone jacks sometimes. So these things were built for connectivity. They're not immune to connectivity. And we don't by the seem seemingly, we don't have to hack Hundreds of machines. These are networked. You can just make software that infects 1 and then dozens of others or just changes the data. Do you think we could, Is it possible so do you think it's possible that we could create a worm that it yet we get on 1 machine in the voting center and it just connects to the other machines covertly and infects them without the bad actors so much as laying a hand on the machine themselves. Speaker 14: The real, proof of concept virus was demonstrated over 10 years ago. So, that that already has been demonstrated publicly that voting machine virus which can, self propagate from 1 voting machine to another, that's a reality which We have sown it's possible. So beyond and that's one of the things why that was created was because, Again, when you say it's possible by showing the vulnerability, people said, well, I don't believe until you show it. So it's one of the rear Things where, a team of researchers developed in the actual virus just to show the logical outcome of the the the vulnerability. Yes. There can be a voting machine virus. Full stop. Here it is. Speaker 18: We've heard a lot from voting machine vendors and election officials that voting machines Can't be hacked because they're not connected to the Internet. All of those vulnerabilities that Andrew talked about, are not a problem because no one can access the machines. And it turns out that the message that they've been giving us for years, and particularly after the 2016 election, just isn't true. Voting machine vendors have sold election officials on these in use of modems. In some cases, the modems are embedded inside the voting machines. In other cases, there are external modems that get attached to the voting machine at the end of the election. So at the end of the election, the machine goes into shutdown mode And then this option pops up about modoming results. And so the system will automatically then dial in and send these votes, over a cellular modem to a server on the Internet that collects the results. So everyone will tell you, and they've told me every time I've spoken with them, that cellular modems are not really Internet connectivity. They will say that doesn't mean that the machine is connected to the Internet. It's using a cellular modem. Well, that's not true. And Election Systems and Software, which is tax. This is one of their statements over and over again with the public. But this is one of their own diagrams that they actually gave to Rhode Island in 2015. And if you see that circular part in the centre there showing that modem transmission using a wireless modem, They sit there, right there. It's on their own diagram that it's going over the internet. So what happens is that the transmission of the votes votes, that the voting machine will dial in using the cellular modem and it contacts the nearest cell tower. And then the data goes through that cell tower into the carrier's back end network. But then the data actually has to get to that county network, and it goes over the Internet to a system, a server that's on the Internet to receive those votes. So we've already now basically shown the misinformation of the transmission of those votes. So ES and S will then say, well, it doesn't matter because all of that process is secured. So the transmission of the votes are secured so that no one can intercept them and read the votes or alter them. The modem is configured in such a way so that no one can actually dial into the modem, it can only dial out, and it can only dial out when the machine shuts down at the end of the election. So apparently, there are all of these safeguards. And also, the back end system that receives the transmitted votes is supposed to communicate only with one of those authenticated machines with the modem. The problem is none of this has been tested or certified. The voting machines themselves go through sort of a federal testing lab process And through certification, the modem transmissions don't. So we don't know what's inside those modems. We don't know how they work. We don't know how they're configured. And ES and S doesn't have a good track record on implementing security. So we don't actually know that the way that they are saying that these are transmitted securely is actually case. So what can happen with a modem machine that's transmitting? So I don't know if you're familiar with something called a stingray. It's a device that law enforcement uses and the military uses. And what it does is it, masquerades as a legitimate cell tower. It transmits a much more powerful signal than the nearby cell tower so that your cell phone will connect to the stingray instead of the cell tower. And then it might pass it on to the cell tower as well. It's mostly used for tracking phones, but there are also Stingrays that are designed also to intercept the content of communication. So if you've got a cellular modem in a voting machine, a rogue person can put a rogue cell tower near some kind of voting precinct, whatever. And instead of that modem then connecting to that cell tower, they can connect to that rogue The rogue cell tower. You can intercept data. If it's not properly encrypted, you could intercept the data and change the results. Or you could basically swap out the a whole package of results if it's not authentically signed, and replace it with your own package of results. And so those go on to the server. If there's a vulnerability in that modem, A hacker can actually transmit malware back onto that voting machine through the rogue cell tower. And once you're in that voting machine, Either that way or maybe you've gotten into the voting machine prior when it's being programmed, you now actually control the configuration of that modem. So even if ES and S says that modem will only work at the end of the election and will only call out and not receive calls in. If you control the configuration of that modem, you change all of that. You can have that machine contact your system at any time you want, for however you want, so that you can do reconnaissance on that machine and study it and established your attack. There were a group of researchers that decided that they would try and see if they could find those backend servers that receive the votes that are transmitted by modem. So if you've got something that's transmitting the votes over the cellular network, there's something that has to be connected to the internet to receive them. So there is a server. And it turns out that they could actually, based on configuration information that's publicly available on the internet, that the voting machine vendors provide to election offices and the election offices post on the internet. They describe the type of that we have created a firewall that they use. It's made by Cisco. They describe the type of FTP software that receives the votes, that sits on that server. They describe the whole configuration, including the type of cellular modem that's embedded in their machines. So based on that information, they decided to see if they could look for that very specific footprint of ESNS machines that are receiving the votes. And they did a scan and they were able to find these systems on the Internet. So they found 9 Wisconsin counties that had systems connected to the Internet, 7 Florida counties, from 4 Michigan counties. They actually found systems in 10 different states, but these were the primary ones. And of course, these are all important critical swing states. So here's the thing. Election officials will tell you, well, the modem transmissions don't matter because we only turn on those modems for a very brief period, less than a minute at the end of the election to transmit. And that's not sufficient time for someone to hack. Any of the technical attack. But more importantly, it turns out these systems aren't just connected for a few minutes after an election. Those back end systems that receive the votes are quite often connected year round. You can see them when they're doing the scans. You can sometimes see them. They come up a couple of weeks. Some of the ones that are only up temporarily will sometimes come up a couple of weeks before the election because they want to test the transmission. And then they leave it on for those weeks before the election. And after the election, they might forget to take it down and it might stay up a couple of other weeks. But there are some that simply never take them down at all. And Wisconsin was one of them. They were on year round. These systems, so what are they? I describe this as a server, but that sounds kind of benign. What is happening is that the The votes are being transmitted, and on the receiving end there's a firewall that's connected to the internet. And behind the firewall, There is this FTP server that the votes are transmitted on. Now that FTP server is supposed to serve as kind of like a DMZ, a safe zone, right? So the votes are deposited and there's supposed to be then no direct connection to the system that actually tabulates the votes. But it turns out that's not the case at all. This is a diagram that ES and S created and handed out to election officials. And so you can see that the votes are coming over the Internet, and they're coming and there's the firewall, and then you see all those wires connected. And you see at the bottom there that EMS, that's the Election Management system. That is the system that tabulates the final results. So even though they say that, that transmission of votes over the Internet is just unofficial, Connected to that system that's receiving those unofficial votes is also the system that is tabulating the official results. What's more, that election management system is also used to program all the voting machines prior to an election. So when, I brought this To ES and S's attention, they didn't then say that nothing is connected to the Internet. What they said was none of those critical systems are pingable from the Internet because there's a firewall in front. So essentially what they're saying is that even though now first they've said that none of these systems are connected to the Internet. And now when they're faced with someone saying, well, they actually are connected, they say, well, they may be configured in some manner that you're showing, but there's a firewall in front of them and therefore, you can't see what's behind the firewall. But if you can find the firewall, then you find the systems that are behind the firewall. The only thing that's protecting anyone from getting into those critical systems behind the firewall are the rules of that firewall that say, only these certain systems can connect to us, only these certain systems can transmit data. That's simply software. It's configuration rules. And if you misconfigure that software, then anything can get into that firewall. And of course, many, many hacks happen because firewalls are misconfigured. Speaker 0: I was part of the team that did the first hands on study of any electronic voting machine used in the US and it was using exactly this machine. And what we found, well, we got one of these machines from a whistleblower, Brought it into a laboratory. Reverse engineered it. And well, here's the result of what we found. We we would run a mock election with George Washington and Benedict Arnold, just like this. And, wanted to know, well, if an attacker that could get malicious software into the machine somehow. Could they change the results? And what we found after reverse engineering the machine was, well, Yeah. There are actually a lot of problems with it. All the records of the vote are contained in, in computer memory. And, an attacker can manipulate the software that's supposed to be running in the machine in a pretty straightforward way. Before every election, officials program the machine with the names of the candidates on the ballot by, installing some that they can change the software running in the machine. There are, unauthenticated software update mechanisms, there are offer overflows and the code that reads the data files from this. There's even an interpreted programming language and the rules for how the votes will be counted are contained in an unauthenticated program contained on the memory card. So through any of those means, An attacker can change the software running on the voting machine and cause the machine to produce whatever election results they want. So that was in about 2007. We, we published the first paper about this. In and that's what we're going to do. And so we're going to have to do that. And so we're going to have to do that. And so we're flows and so forth. There have been hundreds and hundreds of pages of technical reports about US voting machines like this. But even after that, They haven't even updated the software since before the studies I talked about. That's how bad it is. And it's not even just a single model of machine that's the only problem. Country. There are about 52 different models of machines. They fall into essentially 2 styles, ones that scan a piece of paper or ones where the vote, the voter just interacts with the touch screen and many of them have been analyzed now by researchers, Looking for security vulnerabilities. In every single case where a US voting machine has been analyzed by by competent in security researchers. They have found vulnerabilities that would let someone inject malicious software and change election data, every single case. Before every election, election officials have to program the voting machines with who's on the ballot and what are the rules for counting. Well, they make that election programming on a PC workstation somewhere, either at the, at the jurisdiction or at an outside vendor that does it for them. If an attacker can break into that workstation which is called an election management system. They can spread malicious code to all of the memory cards used to program all of the voting machines in the jurisdiction. And those election management system workstations sometimes are connected to the internet, or they're, or the data that's programmed into them passes through an internet connected system. So we're just 1 or 2 hops away from an online attacker. Now how well secured are these systems? Well, here's, a vendor that did the election programming for, in a large fraction of my state in 2016. And we can just take a look at their website to see how secure this is likely to be. You can see, first of all, they don't have any HTTPS. Here are lots of nice, high resolution photographs of their warehouse, in case you want to break in. And perhaps most interestingly, here's their employee directory with everyone's name, job title, email address and photograph. So if I wanted to break into this company, let's say I was the attacker, I'd probably start by forging an email from, let's say, Larry, the president here, to Sue, his administrative assistant, asking her to urgently open an attachment. Now, of course, when she does, that attachment has my malware in it. I have a foothold into their network, and I can try to spread from there to the election management system and to the voting machines in most of the state. Tampering with the national election result in my country it's easier than well, easier than even I thought in 2016. I keep learning things that convince me that the situation is scarier than, than even experts had thought. You identify the states that are most weakly protected and going to be close. Target the computers that are going to program voting machines there, spread malware to machines to change a fraction of the votes, and then rely on the fact that most states, even if they have a paper record, are not going to rigorously use it to check that the computers are right. But the fact is that in close national contests in the US, the result really only hinges on the result in a small number of states. You've heard about the swing states in any given election. The ones that are, really competitive. In such a situation, an attacker can, before the election, identify which states are likely to be close. Try probing all of them in the way that the Russians did the voter registration systems in 2016 and just find the weakest swing states and attack there. So in this way, the American system converts, diversity of implementation into basically this patchwork of strength and weakness that gives attackers a menu of possible places to strike. It makes us weaker in close elections. So just to review, you look at the polls before the election and figure out which states were likely to be close. Probe all of them, find the ones with the weakest protection, then hack into the, election management systems there or at the outside vendors the states use. Once you hack into the election management system, you can spread malicious code to individual voting machines and have your code say, swap 10% of the votes in the places you infected. Then even if the votes are also recorded on a piece of paper, you don't have to worry. Because in most of those states, they're going to just toss the paper out without looking Speaker 5: Modems in voting machines are a bad idea. Those modems are network connections. And that leaves them vulnerable to hacking by anybody who can connect to that network. Speaker 19: ESNS insists While there are 14,000 of its modems in use, there are firewalls separating those modems from the public Internet. Speaker 5: Once a hacker Starts talking to the voting machine through the modem. They can hack the software in the voting machine and make it cheat in future elections. Speaker 17: What is the vehicle for the transmission from the ICP? Is it cellular modem versus VPN? It is a cellular modem that can be configured in a VPN. Right. And we currently in Chicago and Cook County, we work with Verizon to, secure that network. What wireless chipset Slash modem does the hardware have? We support a variety. So, it's really up to the jurisdictions, what technology they want to use, what's compatible with their networks. Speaker 16: Currently, in some jurisdictions, we're using, Basically a modem that is a three d modem, GSM, but we can support multiple varieties of modem that can be. Speaker 17: Including latest 4 gs standards Speaker 14: as well. Speaker 17: So the answers to the next question, is it Speaker 3: 3 gs or 4 gs? Verizon, 8 gs or 2 gs or Sprint, Speaker 5: I'm assuming Speaker 17: all? Yeah, all networks. Speaker 15: Just to Speaker 17: ask a quick question. Yes, I mean, we actually transmit from the ICP in Mongolia as well. So Speaker 7: We're not committed to networks. Speaker 16: And in Puerto Rico, there is 3 vendors because the island is not covered by any by any of the vendors completely. So we use 3 different cellular vendors for some ICPs with this vendor Claro, AT and T, MT Mobile, I think, in the different parts of the app. Speaker 14: More modern attack voting machines. They actually have a mobile phone modem, and to speak, they have a they have a mobile phone mobile phone connectivity to county headquarters. They are sending the results. Speaker 3: Some jurisdictions are relying on uploading election results using cellular modems or, the Internet. That of course introduces another point of vulnerability, not just to the data that's flowing, but also to the software, the devices that, that are being connected. Speaker 1: Many of these voting machines have modems embedded into them. And the modems are used at the end of the election to transmit the vote totals on election night to the county, The, elections office. So these modems contact their cellular modems, and they contact the cellular network, they contact the cell tower. So the cell tower traffic these In our modern times, it actually goes through Internet. It goes through the same kinds of routers and switches that the regular Internet traffic goes to. But also, in between that cell tower and that voting machine, An intruder can, intercept data going to the cell tower and intercept that that communication, that phone call. If you can trick a voting machine into, contacting your device, A fake cellular tower instead of a legitimate tower. You can actually use that connection to get back into the voting machine and get back into the tabulator, and then alter votes and software. Speaker 20: Virginia just stopped Using touch screen computer voting because it's so vulnerable. Speaker 18: We need to look at Speaker 20: all the voting machines. Every secretary of state needs to be, You know, assisted in making sure that they are not being, hacked and and attacked. Speaker 6: I continue to think that our voting machines are too vulnerable. Speaker 21: But researchers have repeatedly demonstrated That ballot recording machines and other voting systems are susceptible to tampering. Speaker 22: Even hackers with limited prior knowledge, tools, and resources are able to breach voting machines In a matter of minutes. Speaker 23: In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted votes for certain candidates or switched votes from 1 candidate to another. Speaker 21: The biggest seller of voting machines is doing something that violates cyber security 101, directing that you install remote access software, which would make a machine like that, you know, a magnet for fraudsters and hackers. Speaker 24: These voting machines can be hacked quite easily. Speaker 25: You could easily Hack into them. It makes it seem like all these states are doing different things, but in fact 3 companies are controlling that. It is the individual voting machines That some pose that pose some of the greatest risks. Speaker 26: There are a lot of states that are dealing with antiquated machines, Right? Which are vulnerable to being hacked. Speaker 24: Workers were able to easily hack into an electronic voting machine. It was possible to switch votes. 43% Speaker 21: of American voters use voting machines that researchers have found have serious security flaws, Including backdoors. Speaker 3: We know how vulnerable now our systems were. We know I know the hackathon that took place last year, where virtually every machine was broken into fairly quickly. Speaker 26: I actually held a demonstration for my colleagues here at the capitol, where we brought in, folks Who, before our eyes, hacked election machines, those that are not those that are being used in many states. Speaker 22: Aging systems also frequently rely on unsupported software, like Windows XP in 2000, which may not receive regular security patches and are thus more vulnerable To the latest methods of cyber attack. Speaker 24: In a close presidential election, they just need to hack 1 swing state, or maybe 1 or 2, Or maybe just a few counties in one swing step. Speaker 27: I'm very concerned that you could have a hack that finally went through. You have 21 states that were hacked into. They didn't find out about it for a year. Right now, we have over a dozen dozen states That either don't have any backup paper ballots or only have them partially. Do you think that our adversaries don't know what those states are? Of course, they know what those states are. And if we have a close election in the general election, in a presidential race, and one state's out withstanding And their ballot boxes get hacked into, their elections get hacked into, we will have absolutely no backup.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

25/ In effect, the left was allowed to discuss the vulnerabilities of voting machines after the 2016 election, and the right was banned from social media platforms for discussing those very same vulnerabilities after the 2020 election.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Virginia has stopped using touchscreen computer voting due to vulnerability, highlighting the need to assess all voting machines for security. Researchers have shown that voting systems are easily tampered with, even by hackers with limited resources. Instances of electronic voting machines deleting or switching votes have been reported in Georgia and Texas. The biggest seller of voting machines has violated cybersecurity principles by installing remote access software, making them attractive to fraudsters. The control of voting machines lies with three companies, posing significant risks. Many states still use outdated and hackable machines, and unsupported software further increases vulnerability. The potential consequences include compromised election results and a loss of faith in the democratic system.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Virginia just stopped using touchscreen computer voting because it's so vulnerable. Right. We need to look at all the voting machines. Every secretary of state needs to be, you know, assisted in making sure that they are not being hacked and and attacked. Speaker 1: I continue to think that our voting machines are too vulnerable. Speaker 2: Researchers have repeatedly demonstrated that ballot recording machines and other voting systems are susceptible to tampering. Speaker 0: Even hackers with limited prior knowledge, tools and resources are able to breach voting machines in a matter of minutes. Speaker 3: In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted votes for certain candidates or switch votes from 1 candidate to another. Speaker 4: The biggest seller of voting machines is doing something that violates cybersecurity 101, directing that you install Remote access software, which would make a machine like that, you know, a magnet for fraudsters and hackers. Speaker 5: These voting machines can be hacked quite easily. Speaker 2: You could easily Hack into them. It makes it seem like all these states are doing different things, but in fact 3 companies are controlling that. It is the individual voting machines That some pose, that pose some of the greatest risks. Speaker 6: There are a lot of states that are dealing with antiquated machines, right, which are vulnerable to being hacked. Speaker 5: The workers were able to easily hack into an electronic voting machine. Speaker 4: It was possible to switch votes. 43% of American voters use voting machines that researchers have found have serious security flaws, Including backdoors. Speaker 7: We know how vulnerable now our systems were. We know I know the hackathon that took place last year, Where virtually every machine was broken into fairly quickly. Speaker 6: I actually held a demonstration for my colleagues here at the capitol, where we brought in, folks Who, before our eyes, hacked election machines, those that are not those that are being used in many states. Speaker 8: Aging systems also frequently rely On unsupported software, like Windows XP in 2000, which may not receive regular security patches and are thus more vulnerable To the latest methods of cyber attack. Speaker 5: In a close presidential election, they just need to hack 1 swing state or maybe 1 or 2 Or maybe just a few counties in one swing state. Speaker 2: I'm very concerned that you could have a hack that finally went through. You have 21 states that were hacked into. They didn't find out about it for a year. Right now, we have over a dozen dozen states that either don't have any backup paper ballots Or only have them partially. You think that our adversaries don't know what those states are? Of course, they know what those states are. And if we have a close election in the general election, in a presidential race, and one state's out withstanding and their Ballot boxes get hacked into. Their elections get hacked into. We will have absolutely no backup. Stalin was unconcerned about the vote. After all, he explained, he said that who voted was completely unimportant. What was Extraordinarily important, in his words, was who would count the votes and how. It is time to put politics aside and come together to secure the future of our election. So whether you're a 4 star general, A 4th grade teacher or a computer engineer at Foursquare, this is an issue that unites us. Speaker 8: In at least 40 states, elections are carried out using machines that are at least a decade old. And like any technology, -They're susceptible to increasing failure with age. Some state officials have had to turn to eBay to find critical components like dot matrix printers, Decades old storage devices and analog modems, aging systems also frequently rely on unsupported software Like Windows XP in 2000, which may not receive regular security patches and are thus more vulnerable to the latest Methods of cyber attack. Speaker 3: In 2016, state election websites in Illinois and Arizona were hacked by intruders who installed malware and downloaded sensitive voter information. Speaker 6: It is worth fighting for integrity in our election system, which means that they are free from interference by a hostile Or an unfriendly nation. Let's put the resources into upgrading the state's election systems. Because what we know is this. There are a lot of states that are dealing with antiquated machines, right, which are vulnerable to being hacked. I sit on the senate intelligence committee and senate homeland security committee. And we receive all kinds of information about the vulnerabilities to our national Security. We are vulnerable in terms of foreign interference with our elections. It's my understanding that some of the election system Vendors have required states to sign agreements, that prevent or inhibit independent, security testing. There's a saying that I'm sure Many of you have heard, which is the you know the difference between being hacked and not being hacked? Is knowing you've been hacked. Speaker 0: And they are still looking for ways to steal information about Voter registration, for example. There are some text experts in Silicon Valley Valley with whom I have met who say that, You know, maybe what they'll do this next time is to really disrupt the actual election. Shut down the servers that you send results to. Interfere with the operation of voting machines because still too many of them are linked to the Internet. So there we are still very vulnerable. Speaker 9: I mean, I can tell you in Virginia, when I was governor, I had to replace all the machines. Because I remember when I first voted when I went to Richmond, moved down as governor, I remember I kept voting in the senate race, kept voting for the Democrat. Republican name kept coming up. Three times that happened. Speaker 1: What do Speaker 4: you mean kept Coming up. Speaker 9: So I you know, we had the touch screens. I was voting for Mark Warner, our senator, and Ed Gosphy's name was light up. Happened to me 3 times. Finally, the 4th time, Mark Damon, I quickly hit vote, and I got out of there. You know, all the cameras are looking at me like this guy doesn't know how to vote. I mean, what's going on? So then I had an investigation done, and listen to this. I brought in some technology experts. They were able to hack into our machines from off-site In about 5 or 6 minutes, and within 4 minutes, they were able to change a vote. IDD certified all the machines. Now in Virginia, we have paper ballots. Speaker 4: 43% of American voters use voting machines that researchers have found have Serious security flaws, including backdoors. These companies are accountable to no one. They won't answer basic questions about their cybersecurity practices, and the biggest companies Won't answer any questions at all. 5 states have no paper trail, And that means there is no way to prove the numbers the voting machines put out are legitimate. So much for cybersecurity 101. The vast majority of 10,000 election jurisdictions Nationwide, use election management systems that run on old software That is soon gonna be out of date and ripe for exploitation by hackers according To an exhaustive analysis by the Associated Press, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Florida, Iowa, Indiana, Arizona, and North Carolina, among others, Are all at risk. Even the state of Georgia, which just passed legislation to buy new voting machines, is on track to buy equipment that suffers from this significant cybersecurity weakness. Let's say the election is decided by a small percentage And people in America don't think that the election was fair. The effect that would have On our 200 year experiment in self governance, our democratic system Would take a real hit. Our elections weren't secure last week And they sure as heck aren't secure this week. And anybody who says otherwise It's either selling the voting machines or simply has a malicious intent towards our elections. At one point in the intelligence committee, both sides seemed to agree that no votes were changed In the 2016 election, and I said, the experts I talk to say that Until you have a forensic analysis of a vote, until you go in there and scrub the whole system, You can't really say that. So they're giving these voting machines specifically the hack into how successful were they? Speaker 1: Well, the the ongoing record Was, they hacked within 90 minutes of, being, being in the same space as the voting machines. Now these are not hackers that are actually touching the machines. They're doing this from across the room, on, on Internet like connections. But what it demonstrated, Pedro, is that the machines that we count on to make the basic connection between the American voter And the election results are vulnerable if they're in any way connected to the Internet. Speaker 4: And so when you say hacked, what were they able to do once they gained Access to the machines. Speaker 1: All sorts of things. They could manipulate, the outcome of the vote, they could manipulate the tally, they could delete the tally, and and they could compromise the vote in any number of ways. Just it was limited only by the hackers' creativity. Just how vulnerable Speaker 10: the machines were. I mean, what we found is that These machines were purchased by, local voting authorities, state and local voting authorities maybe 10 years ago. In many cases, the software and the hardware have not been updated, so they're as vulnerable as an old laptop That we might have, in in your home that you no longer use because it's just so out of date. Then what we found is that the supply chain for these these machines is largely un plotted. I mean, We found parts from China. We found, digital electronic parts from all over the world. By way of hacking, there's the potential that the actual vote tally could be compromised. So votes could be changed from this to that. Or votes could be suppressed, votes could be deleted, votes could be added, so you could actually change the tally itself.
Curiousityfirst
Posted - January 8, 2023 at 10:17 PM
Saved - June 4, 2023 at 9:05 AM

@Curiousityfirst - DogAndBone @Curious Cat

@jhalderm the same guy that found the Dominion vulnerability, wherein instead of stating they breached their contract, he ensured that DOMINION's CVR's were "sanitised" to make it difficult to analyse. @JanuszP20 @noodles @CannConActual @TxSaving https://t.co/AL4uliCgdh

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

🚨Hacking America's Election System 1 hour of computer scientists, election security experts, and Senate Democrats talking about how easy it is to hack voting machines. @KariLake @katiehobbs @GenFlynn @realMikeLindell @bgmasters @PatrickByrne @JackPosobiec @DavidSacks @elonmusk https://t.co/sH4Ft0iMsB

Video Transcript AI Summary
Voting machines in the US are vulnerable to hacking and manipulation, according to security researchers. These machines, which come in various models, have been found to have security vulnerabilities that allow attackers to inject malicious software and change election data. The most efficient way to hack the machines is through the machine used to program them, as it can pass rogue software to the voting machines. Contrary to popular belief, many voting machines are connected to the internet, either through wireless modems or other means, making them susceptible to cyber attacks. The lack of proper security measures and outdated systems make it only a matter of time before election results are compromised.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know America's voting machines are vulnerable because my colleagues and I have hacked them repeatedly. We've created attacks that can spread from machine to machine like a computer virus, and silently change election outcomes, and in every single case We've found ways for attackers to sabotage machines and to steal votes. Across the country, there are about 52 different models of machines. They they fall into essentially 2 styles. Ones that scan a piece of paper or ones where the vote, the voter just interacts with the touch screen. And many of them have been analyzed now by researchers, looking for security vulnerabilities. In every single case where a US voting machine has been analyzed by competent security researchers, They have found vulnerabilities that would let someone inject malicious software and change election data. Every single case. Speaker 1: The better or the more efficient way of hacking machines would be to subvert them all through the machine that's used to actually program those machines. So prior to each election, the county election office or the voting machine vendor will actually program memory cards for that election. It tells the machine who are the candidates, what are the, you know, the the contests being decided, and that gets It's inserted into the voting machine. If you can alter, if you can subvert that machine that is used to program those memory cards, then you can pass rogue software to the voting machine. Speaker 0: Voting machines that are not connected to the internet. This is something that you hear all the time in the US from election officials. Unfortunately, it's not actually true. Many new voting machines that come with 4 gs wireless modems so that they can be connected to the internet from the polling place in order to upload the results faster. Now to me, that sounds crazy. Why would you want to put your voting machines on the Internet right in the middle of the election, potentially at the most vulnerable Speaker 2: time. Studies conducted in 2007 by the state of California, state of Ohio, state of Florida found security vulnerabilities that could take advantage of these To engineer viruses where 1 compromised voting machine could then infect eventually the entire fleet of machines for an entire county. Typically at the end of the election day, you move a memory card through each of the machines in the precinct, and that's to collect the vote totals. That process can spread a virus. And there are other processes. The details vary from machine to machine. Speaker 3: When you say hacked, what were they able to do once they gained access to the machines? Speaker 4: All sorts of Executally manipulate the outcome of the vote. They could manipulate the tally. They could delete the tally, and and they could compromise the vote in any number of ways. Speaker 5: The machines used in Georgia have been demonstrated to be hackable through a virus that's carried on ballot definition cartridges. Very much like this Duxnet virus was inserted into nuclear centrifuges in Iran. Speaker 3: There are a number of states that outsource their reporting of elections to third parties, some of which are corporations based in other countries like Spain. So you've got to trust that the aggregation of the votes and the reporting of the votes is accurate as well. Speaker 0: I'm pretty sure my undergrad computer security class at Michigan could have changed the outcome of the 2016 teen Michigan election if we wanted to. It is that bad. And we have a combination of very powerful adversaries, and unfortunately quite vulnerable and obsolete systems. That's that's why I say it's only a matter of time. Speaker 6: Unfortunately, in a lot of these systems, The audit trails are just as vulnerable as the other aspects of the system. So there may not be good forensic evidence of a successful intrusion. With the current design, we cannot be universally confident that it hasn't happened. And it's probably only a matter of time before it will. Speaker 7: I come here today as a computer scientist who spent the better part of the last quarter century studying Election system security. As you're well aware, the integrity of elections across the US depends heavily on the integrity of computers and Software systems. Unfortunately, much of this infrastructure has proven dangerously vulnerable to tampering and attack, and in some cases, In ways that cannot be easily detected or corrected, after the fact. These vulnerabilities can create practical avenues for, corrupt candidates or foreign adversaries to do everything from cause large scale disruption on Election Day to potentially, undetectably alter, election outcomes in some cases. So let me begin with the voting equipment itself. To be blunt, it's a widely recognized, really indisputable fact that every piece of computerized voting equipment in use at polling places today Can be easily compromised, in ways that have the potential to disrupt election, operations, compromise firmware and software, Potentially alter, vote tallies in the absence of, other safeguards. This is partly a consequence of historically poor design and implementation by equipment vendors, but it's ultimately a reflection of the nature of complex software. It's simply beyond the state of the art, to build software systems that can reliably withstand targeted attack By a determined adversary in this kind of an environment. The vulnerabilities are real. They're serious. And absent a surprising and very fundamental break through in my field, which I would welcome, but I don't see coming, soon, probably inevitable. We give most of the attention to vulnerabilities in voting machines, But that's not the whole story. Each of the more than 5,000 jurisdictions responsible for running elections across the nation Must maintain a number of critical information systems that are attractive targets for disruption by adversaries. Most important of these are voter registration databases, the systems that report, final results, and so forth. Unfortunately, There are even fewer standards for how to secure these systems. The administration of these systems varies widely. And the threats against these systems are often even more, acute than the threats against individual voting systems. You know, just as we don't expect the local sheriff to single handedly defend against military ground invasions, we shouldn't expect county election IT managers to defend against cyber attacks by foreign intelligence services, but that's precisely what we've been asking them, to do. Speaker 0: I'm a professor of computer science and have spent the last 10 years studying the electronic voting systems that our nation relies on. My conclusion from that work is that our highly computerized election infrastructure that is vulnerable to sabotage, and even to cyber attacks that could change votes. These realities risk making our election results more difficult for the American people to trust. I know America's voting machines are vulnerable because my colleagues and I have hacked them repeatedly, as part of a decade of research, studying the technology that operates elections and learning how to make it stronger. We've created attacks that can spread from machine to machine, like a computer virus, and silently change election outcomes. We've studied touch screen and optical scan systems, and in every single case we've found ways for attackers to sabotage machines and to steal votes. These capabilities are certainly within reach for America's enemies. As you know, states choose their own voting technology. And while some states are doing well with security, others are alarmingly vulnerable. This puts the entire nation at risk. In close elections, an attacker can probe the most important swing states or swing counties, find areas with the weakest protection, and strike there. In a close election year changing a few votes in key, localities could be enough to tip national results. The key lesson from 2016 is that these threats are real. Some say the fact that voting machines aren't directly connected to the Internet makes them secure, but unfortunately this is not true. Voting machines are not as distant from the Internet as they may seem. So the way these attacks work Is that before every election, every voting machine needs to be programmed with the design of the ballot, the names of the races and candidates. And voting officials do that by inserting a memory card into the machine. If an attacker can infect that memory card With malicious code, well, when the memory card is inserted into the machine, it can change the programming running on the voting machine And caused the voting machine to, at the end of the election, output whatever results the attacker wants. Speaker 5: The machine that I hacked is called the Sequoia AVC Advantage, now called the Dominion AVC Advantage. It's in The computer program that counts the votes on this machine is in a read only memory that's mounted in a socket on the motherboard. To hack this machine, you have to Remove that memory chip from its socket and install a memory chip, on which you've prepared a cheating program. The cheating program that I prepared, has an extra 100 lines of code basically that, when the polls are about to close, it goes in there and changes some votes stored in the machine. And there is an electronic log of all votes cast, so it changes the log too. So to install that, the attacker doesn't need to be a computer scientist, the attacker just needs to have A bunch of copies of this memory chip, with the fraudulent program on it. And for each voting machine, unscrew 10 screws to remove the panel that that covers the motherboard, pry out the ROM chip containing the legitimate program and install the ROM chip containing the fraudulent program. Other kinds of voting machines store their computer program that counts to votes in flash memory. And this can be updated Under the control of whatever computer program happens to be running in the voting machine. These voting machines, typically the generation developed in the 1990s and after, can be hacked without actually physically changing any hardware in the machine, just by installing a software upgrade Memory card in the same slot that one would normally install the ballot definition. And this particular attack was demonstrated by my colleague at Princeton, Professor Felton, In about 2007, working with 2 of his graduate students. But it's not just us at Princeton, there are many kinds of voting machines and The same kinds of hacks are applicable to all voting machines and have been demonstrated at several other universities, including University of Connecticut, Johns Hopkins, Michigan and others. There are cyber security issues in all parts of our election system. Before the election, voter registration databases. During the election, voting machines. After the election, vote tabulation, canvassing, precinct aggregation computers. Installing new software in a voting machine is not really much different from installing new software in any other kind of computer. Installing new software is how you hack a voting machine to cheat. In 2009, in the courtroom of the Superior Court of New Jersey, I demonstrated how to hack a voting machine. I wrote a vote stealing computer program that shifts votes from 1 candidate to another. Installing that vote stealing program in a voting machine takes 7 minutes per machine with a screwdriver. But really the software I built was not rocket science. Any computer programmer could write the same code. Once it's installed, it could steal elections without detection for years to come. Voting machines are often delivered to polling places several days before the election, to elementary schools, churches, firehouses. In these locations, anyone could gain access to a voting machine for 10 minutes. Between elections, the machines are routinely opened up for maintenance by county employees or private contractors. Let's assume they have the utmost integrity. But still in the US we try to run our elections so that we can trust the election results without relying on any one individual. Other computer scientists have demonstrated similar hacks on many models of machine. This is not just 1 glitch in 1 manufacturer's machine. It's the very nature of computers. So how can we trust our elections when it's so easy to make the computers cheat? Speaker 8: Mr. Appel, in that scenario, an attacker would actually have to have access to all 100 in the 1 county in order to manipulate the records. Speaker 5: In Georgia, that's not the case. The machines used in Georgia Have been demonstrated to be hackable through a virus that's carried on ballot definition cartridges, very much like this Stuxnet virus was, inserted into nuclear centrifuges in Iran. So, and in Speaker 8: that auditing system, in the auditing of these machines. We look at that. Is that correct? Speaker 5: I'm sorry. Can you repeat the question? Speaker 8: So, in those machines that have that vulnerability in the auditing process. Isn't that scanned? Don't we scan for that? Speaker 5: It's difficult to scan for that vulnerability in the sense of if you Ask a machine to report what software is loaded in it. If it's fraudulent software, it will lie. So, the AccuVote TS machines, used in Georgia and in a few counties in other states are particularly vulnerable to this kind of virus that can be carried to the machines even if the criminal attacker doesn't touch the machines or is not even in the same state with the machines. Cap. Speaker 9: With parts made all over the world, and software made all over the world, and as Sherry said, there's only 3 or 4 manufacturers, the the one core point That kind of election security experts and others have been making about why our votes are safe was that the decentralized nature of our, Voting systems, the thousands and thousands of of, voting offices around the country that administer the election is what kept safe because Russians would need to have tens of thousands of operatives go get physical access to machines to actually, infiltrate the election. We now know that's false. And that through a handful of simple attacks, into manufacturers not in the United States, The Russians could plant malware into, thousands of machines all at once and hack the entire U. S. Election without ever leaving the Kremlin. Speaker 10: Or is there a different way where you could just hack one machine and that would transmit a bug to other machines in the precinct, again, even though they're not connected to an internet. Speaker 2: Sure. So before we had an Internet, we had computers with floppy drives. And there were computer viruses that could spread from 1 computer to another over floppies. Electronic voting machines, some of them use memory cards, some of them have these big battery packs, some of them have local area networks. Studies conducted in 2007 by the state of California, state of Ohio, state of Florida found security vulnerabilities that could take advantage of these to engineer viruses where 1 compromised voting machine could then infect eventually the entire fleet of machines for an entire county. And Each of these studies found ways that regular poll workers and election officials going through their standard procedures and and standard operations Could unwittingly be used to transmit viruses from 1 machine to another through the motion. Typically at the end of the election day, you move a memory card through each of the machines in the precinct, and that's to collect the vote totals. That process can spread a virus. And there are other processes. The details vary from machine to machine. Speaker 10: Okay. So it's accurate to say that just because something is not connected to the internet, it does not have a vulnerability to cyber attack. Speaker 2: Being disconnected from the Internet helps, but it's not a panacea, okay? Speaker 11: When you and your colleagues hacked election systems, did you get caught? Speaker 0: We hacked, election systems as part of academic research where we had machines in our system. Did you get caught? Speaker 11: Did they did they see your intrusion into their systems? Speaker 0: The one instance when I was invited to hack a real voting system to while people were watching, was in Washington, D. C. In 2010, and in that instance it took less than 48 hours for us to change all the votes, and we were not caught. Speaker 11: Vice, Chairman. Speaker 0: I have sitting in my office right now actually, a deep old AccuVote TSX machine, a touchscreen machine that's still in use in 23 states, where, I've hacked it to give whatever outcome I want. It it really is that easy. And when you're talking about, when you're talking about these attacks, though, I don't think it's something that, You know, just in every case, a, a freshman in college could do it. Some states are a little bit better protected, but that's not who we're up against. We're up against nation state attackers that are among some of the most Powerful, adversaries in the world when it comes to cyber attacks, and which have routinely compromised highly protected sites like, like military installations, and large tech companies. I think that's the thing that I want voting officials and and voters to understand is quite what they're up against. And we have a combination of very powerful adversaries and series, and unfortunately quite vulnerable and obsolete systems. That's why I say it's only a matter of time. Speaker 3: The standard arguments that, our elections can't be hacked in the US are some combination of physical security. You can't get access to the devices, they're not connected to the internet, they're tested before Election Day, and the system is too decentralized. It's run by, you know, a bunch of individual election officials and individual counties and and jurisdictions. So it's it's a it's a hard target. Most of this has already been debunked by, the previous speakers, but, physical security is pretty lax. Equipment, has sleepovers in school gymnasiums, and churches, and this and that. There are lots of, examples on the Internet of photos of, election, equipment warehouses, where the the Election officials warehouses with the door propped open and nobody watching. Just, it's just not true. It isn't true that the machines aren't connected to the Internet, and even if they weren't to the Internet that would still be hackable through other means. One of the things that hasn't been mentioned so far yet is supply chain hacks. There are components in these voting systems that come from foreign countries. A colleague of ours, Karsten Sherman, at the IT University of Copenhagen, Found Chinese pop songs in memory of a voting machine that he bought, on the Internet. So that those songs somehow made it through the quality control of The election equipment vendor, and then through, how many elections that it was actually used in by the local election official, and, and, you know, we're still there. Moreover, there's an issue in reporting, which I'm not going to talk about that much, but there are a number of states that outsource their reporting of elections to third parties, some of which are corporations based in other countries like Spain. So you've got to trust that the aggregation of the votes and the reporting of the votes is is, is accurate as well. There's a lot of technology being rolled out in this election, that had either not been used or not been used as widely before. This includes, much more widespread reliance on things like electronic poll books, which become a point of vulnerability that can disenfranchise people if they malfunction, if they lose their Internet connection, or if they've been hacked, some jurisdictions are relying on uploading election results using cellular modems or, the internet That, of course, introduces another point of vulnerability, not just to the data that's flowing, but also to the software, the devices that, that are being connected. Voting equipment itself, there are states that have rolled out touchscreen voting for all in person voters. This is, An unnecessary introduction of brittle and vulnerable technology. Many pieces of electronic technology that are involved in elections are Either incorporate, devices that were built overseas, or assembled overseas, and many crucial functions are being outsourced to foreign companies. One, noteworthy example that I'm especially concerned about, there is a Spanish firm, called CITL, which runs, they they provide election reporting for something like 11 US states. They're based in Spain, and they're bankrupt. So that could, obviously, is a point of failure where, someone could shed a lot of mistrust over the election results By simply falsifying what gets posted, even if the correct results could ultimately be recovered from durable reliable records, that would certainly, cast a lot of fear uncertainty and doubt on what's going on. There have been ransomware attacks on, government systems now including some voting systems, We know that there are cyber warfare attacks by Russia, China, Iran and North Korea. There most states voter registration databases were, penetrated in 2016, there is a lot of evidence that data were changed, but that could certainly happen this time around. So all in all, there's a lot of confusion, there are a lot of points of vulnerability. There are a lot of known problems. There are some election vendors who have been hacked, before 2016. VR systems was hacked in Florida. Some of their clients were, there were phishing attacks against them this time, around, let's see, I forgot my name of it. Tyler Technologies, which provides some, vote by mail ballot, tracking and some vote aggregation reporting has also been hacked. So overall, there's an awful lot that can go wrong. Speaker 12: He saw no evidence of, Tampering with, no, voter voting machines or voter tallies. That's not true. It didn't happen. We just didn't see the evidence of it. Speaker 13: Well, there has been never a documented incident when votes have been changed during the real election. And my answer was please continue using these machines and that will remain to be true forever, Because these machines don't have a capability of providing you forensic evidence to see if they cannot prove they were honest, they cannot prove that they were have been hacked. They simply don't have the fundamental basic capabilities of providing you that forensic evidence, that data. Only way you can see that that machine was hacked if the attacker wanted to be found that it was hacked. That's a sad truth. So Anyone who says I have a information one way or another, that's an opinion. That's not fact based. Fact is, it can be done without leaving trace. Speaker 14: When you know how the system for looking for the evidence, you know that you won't find it because the systems are not recording, Generating, preserving or protecting meaningful forensic evidence. And this is from the very beginning to the end of the process everywhere. These systems really don't have a capability of recording and protecting any meaningful audit information or forensically important information. So a lot of times I would also argue that even if you try to take a look into the into the evidence, the problem is that there is no Evidence which is trustworthy and and worth on a lot. Even recently, a case where a voting machine was reporting, and I believe that was in the last year in North voting machine was in the race where they had 50,000 votes cast, was cast reporting to 1 candidate 164 or something like that votes. And when the paper was looped, that person actually get 26,000 vote and vote by 1 by 1,000 votes. Speaker 12: Wow. Speaker 14: So we we really need to have that paper ballot. There's nothing we don't have a technology to do electronic voltage. The problem the most most Driving thing is, first of all, from 2006 to now is nothing changed. The actual same version of software I hacked 2005 is still in use. It's those machines are still in 20 states. Mhmm. So they're still around. Even the so called new sold today is In the end of life version of of Windows, etcetera, like, just something which no other industry would be acceptable, would be remotely acceptable. So I think the most as overall, it is how outdated everything is And and how hard it is to make people to understand the the reality and and get the warning through that this needs to be fixed or things will get really, really worse, turn the worse. They're bad right now, but and I cannot even Cannot imagine what the worst would be looking like. Parties, they are not actually but a lot of these voting machines are not US origin. And I'm not only talking about the components being made in China or a voting machine being assembled in in Philippines, but also the very of the machine, the programming. In many many many voting machines, that programming, either whole or in the large part is Coming from a foreign from code sources. And it seems to be the case that actually the voting machine vendors, Generally speaking, either don't know or they refuse to tell the truth where the code actually comes. And it turned out that the system he is using exactly the same system which created this magnitude 16,022 votes in Volusia County for Al Gore. So I took a look into the system, figured out a couple of ways to manipulate the central tabulator. But I told I on this well, this is not elegant. You leave a audit trail. You leave a evidence, the bet bet, breadcrumbles. You can trace it. I was asked, well, if there what is the elegant way? So I have I don't know if there's 1. But if if there is, it's gotta be this memory card. Speaker 15: So it's so it's a memory card that fits into the voting machine that you found could be the more or less untraceable or hard to trace way to manipulate the results, whereas they were thinking it was something in the machine. You thought this was attack because you would see a ton of evidence and, like you said, breadcrumbs being left by the tampering party. Speaker 14: Well, it's it's no. It's if not even that. I was just Thinking about the architecture of the system. And with that architecture, it made sense that there's executable program in the memory card. And I was quickly told that that's impossible because it's against the certified rules. But, also, the vendor was dishonest about the origin of the card. So, well, if they are not Honest about one thing they're probably not honest about. The second thing, I found an executable program on a memory card. I found it's it's completely unprotected. This This memory card is so old. It's older than floppy drive. So it actually, I found it because I was I remember that I have seen it before floppy drives existed. So that's what I found who was the original manufacturer of it. And a, interesting The thing about this explanation afterwards was that demand 16,000 was malfunction Of the memory card, that's the, that's the reason why it happened. Not possible. That reason why it's not possible is that that memory card Doesn't know how to make negative numbers. So whatever caused that man respond 16,000 votes, which we don't know what caused it. At least the official explanation given at the time, not possible. Something else happened. Speaker 1: So everyone was focused in 2000 on the punch card machines and the problems that that brought. But in Fallucia County, there was an incident that occurred. It didn't A lot of attention. And the attention that it did get sort of disappeared and got lost in all of the focus on the punch card machines. What happened in Volusia County was around At 10 p. M. Midnight or sorry, 10 p. M. On election night. Prior to that, Al Gore in Volusia County was ahead of George Bush. But around 10 p. M, suddenly, Al Gore's number started reversing. And it reversed more than 16,000 votes. And in There aren't, it was all happening in 1 precinct, and of course, there weren't 16,000 voters in that 1 precinct. So Gore's numbers were actually showing a negative 16,000 in that precinct. And the explanation that election officials provided was that, a faulty memory card was inserted into the tabulating machine. Now, it wasn't, the, let's say, legitimate memory card. So there was 1 memory card for this precinct, and it was uploaded to a tabulator on election night. But the logs show that an hour after that memory card was uploaded, another 2nd memory card for that same precinct was uploaded. And after that 2nd card was uploaded, that's when the votes for Gore started disappearing. And no one has been able to explain what exactly happened with that, whether that was a rogue card that was intentionally designed to hack the votes and misfired and therefore, Erased too many votes for Gore or whether this was, you know, a software mishap. But no one has explained why 2 memory cards for the same precinct were uploaded. And that's that's sort of the main problem in terms of chains of custody, the fact that a second memory card was actually ever able to be uploaded. Speaker 6: And John Kerry has expressed misgivings about the 2004 vote in Ohio. Speaker 1: Yes. So they had concerns about the machines in Ohio. Ohio was still largely using punch card machines. They hadn't replaced theirs yet. But there were still counties there were counties that were already using optical scan machines and also paperless DRE machines. And he and his group, he revealed this only recently, actually went to court court to try and obtain the algorithms, the software, to look at the software to make sure that it would be counting votes accurately. And the courts denied access to it because the proprietary software on voting machines is considered a trade secret. And so the private voting machine companies go to court to fight against this, and the courts generally agree with them. Speaker 14: When I and others, when we 2005, 2006 got involved And up until 2008, we all thought now when the problem has been exposed, it will be fixed very quickly. It would it was completely Always incomprehensible for me and and other secretary researchers that now 2020, we are talking about this topic. And, also, we are 2020 using the same machines with the same software. It's just you wouldn't be using a a 30 year old PC with with no security patches, But that's exactly how the elections are conducted. Let's talk about everything in the world how this works. Speaker 16: Okay. Speaker 17: So Speaker 14: you have a voting message, a voting terminal. That's how you pass your ballot, either electronically or paper ballot, it's go scanning. And after that, these machines are reporting those results Very often, our our communication lies through the central tabulator. Now in both in the county level, or or state level, where the votes are accumulated in database, and along the path, there are number of data storage, systems databases. And if you manipulate those, you can create an illusion of a different results. And you can even do it in the about election reporting system. So instead of even hacking anything in the tabulator system, you are just creating wrong reporting. So there are a number of ways how you can, through this whole path, influence the results. And we have to actually step even further back, Steph, because if we look the election as whole, it's a myriad of system. We have voter registration system. Them. We have electronic poll book systems. We have the election management. We have the ballot casting. We have the tabulation, and we have the reporting. Any of these, if you have one of these, you can always have the result. You can disenfranchise voters so they can cast their ballot. You can change the the outcome. You can change the reporting. Each of these needs to be secured. None of these is less important than the others. And that's why we have been I think in the public mind, we have been focusing in a very narrow area, Which is you cast a ballot on how the ballot is counted, but not missing the whole big picture. How many other systems from a adversary, how from from ethical's point of view, where the other can go and achieve the same goal. How about the Internet? It really it's everything is connected to Internet either directly or indirectly. And the more modern voting machines, they actually have a mobile phone Modem, in to speak, they have a they have a mobile phone mobile phone connectivity to county headquarters. They are sending the results. So wireless is coming back to the voting message in the newer generations. Nice marketing material trying to tell it's not, but it is. A journalist in a year ago, she found 200 voting machines in the Internet. Voting machine vendors say, well, they are not in Internet because they are not pingable. My answer to that is, are you from the past? Because since since 15 years ago, nothing is really anymore pingable, And they are still connected to Internet. It's the the whole argument is 15 that argument was to have been meaning something 15 years ago. It doesn't mean anything today. And, again, I I was just came from Atlanta, and and they have new working machines because the judge ordered the old ones to be scrapped. And part of the things in the the judge's ruling was that, The finding was that the voting machine were programmed by basically 3 guys from their homes and who sent all the programming of the voting machine for next hours and over Internet to We distribute all the machines. Speaker 15: Oh, so these guys had programmed the machines from home, and then they they pushed the code update to the voting machines via the Internet. Speaker 14: We what they said but they pushed it to the state, and then the state pushed it to the counties. And, actually, this whole thing about, the critical election specific programming going over Internet is very common because lot of this programming is done by private companies, third party management companies. And it's, it has been shocking the last 2 years when I have been working for a number of secretaries of state And looking how the security has done in their state just to find that email, FTP with no security. These are the common methods to send the most mission critical programming from the private company, which might be out of state, to the local county who is putting it into the machines. It is whoever controls that data controls the election. Speaker 15: And these machines, they like you said, they have network cards. You show in Kill Chain, again, the documentary that we'll link in the show notes, that they have USB ports. They have memory card slots. They have modems and phone jacks sometimes. So these things were built for connectivity. They're not immune to connectivity. And we don't by the seem seemingly, we don't have to hack Hundreds of machines. These are networked. You can just make software that infects 1 and then dozens of others or just changes the data. Do you think we could, Is it possible so do you think it's possible that we could create a worm that it yet we get on 1 machine in the voting center and it just connects to the other machines covertly and infects them without the bad actors so much as laying a hand on the machine themselves. Speaker 14: The real, proof of concept virus was demonstrated over 10 years ago. So, that that already has been demonstrated publicly that voting machine virus which can, self propagate from 1 voting machine to another, that's a reality which We have sown it's possible. So beyond and that's one of the things why that was created was because, Again, when you say it's possible by showing the vulnerability, people said, well, I don't believe until you show it. So it's one of the rear Things where, a team of researchers developed in the actual virus just to show the logical outcome of the the the vulnerability. Yes. There can be a voting machine virus. Full stop. Here it is. Speaker 18: We've heard a lot from voting machine vendors and election officials that voting machines Can't be hacked because they're not connected to the Internet. All of those vulnerabilities that Andrew talked about, are not a problem because no one can access the machines. And it turns out that the message that they've been giving us for years, and particularly after the 2016 election, just isn't true. Voting machine vendors have sold election officials on these in use of modems. In some cases, the modems are embedded inside the voting machines. In other cases, there are external modems that get attached to the voting machine at the end of the election. So at the end of the election, the machine goes into shutdown mode And then this option pops up about modoming results. And so the system will automatically then dial in and send these votes, over a cellular modem to a server on the Internet that collects the results. So everyone will tell you, and they've told me every time I've spoken with them, that cellular modems are not really Internet connectivity. They will say that doesn't mean that the machine is connected to the Internet. It's using a cellular modem. Well, that's not true. And Election Systems and Software, which is tax. This is one of their statements over and over again with the public. But this is one of their own diagrams that they actually gave to Rhode Island in 2015. And if you see that circular part in the centre there showing that modem transmission using a wireless modem, They sit there, right there. It's on their own diagram that it's going over the internet. So what happens is that the transmission of the votes votes, that the voting machine will dial in using the cellular modem and it contacts the nearest cell tower. And then the data goes through that cell tower into the carrier's back end network. But then the data actually has to get to that county network, and it goes over the Internet to a system, a server that's on the Internet to receive those votes. So we've already now basically shown the misinformation of the transmission of those votes. So ES and S will then say, well, it doesn't matter because all of that process is secured. So the transmission of the votes are secured so that no one can intercept them and read the votes or alter them. The modem is configured in such a way so that no one can actually dial into the modem, it can only dial out, and it can only dial out when the machine shuts down at the end of the election. So apparently, there are all of these safeguards. And also, the back end system that receives the transmitted votes is supposed to communicate only with one of those authenticated machines with the modem. The problem is none of this has been tested or certified. The voting machines themselves go through sort of a federal testing lab process And through certification, the modem transmissions don't. So we don't know what's inside those modems. We don't know how they work. We don't know how they're configured. And ES and S doesn't have a good track record on implementing security. So we don't actually know that the way that they are saying that these are transmitted securely is actually case. So what can happen with a modem machine that's transmitting? So I don't know if you're familiar with something called a stingray. It's a device that law enforcement uses and the military uses. And what it does is it, masquerades as a legitimate cell tower. It transmits a much more powerful signal than the nearby cell tower so that your cell phone will connect to the stingray instead of the cell tower. And then it might pass it on to the cell tower as well. It's mostly used for tracking phones, but there are also Stingrays that are designed also to intercept the content of communication. So if you've got a cellular modem in a voting machine, a rogue person can put a rogue cell tower near some kind of voting precinct, whatever. And instead of that modem then connecting to that cell tower, they can connect to that rogue The rogue cell tower. You can intercept data. If it's not properly encrypted, you could intercept the data and change the results. Or you could basically swap out the a whole package of results if it's not authentically signed, and replace it with your own package of results. And so those go on to the server. If there's a vulnerability in that modem, A hacker can actually transmit malware back onto that voting machine through the rogue cell tower. And once you're in that voting machine, Either that way or maybe you've gotten into the voting machine prior when it's being programmed, you now actually control the configuration of that modem. So even if ES and S says that modem will only work at the end of the election and will only call out and not receive calls in. If you control the configuration of that modem, you change all of that. You can have that machine contact your system at any time you want, for however you want, so that you can do reconnaissance on that machine and study it and established your attack. There were a group of researchers that decided that they would try and see if they could find those backend servers that receive the votes that are transmitted by modem. So if you've got something that's transmitting the votes over the cellular network, there's something that has to be connected to the internet to receive them. So there is a server. And it turns out that they could actually, based on configuration information that's publicly available on the internet, that the voting machine vendors provide to election offices and the election offices post on the internet. They describe the type of that we have created a firewall that they use. It's made by Cisco. They describe the type of FTP software that receives the votes, that sits on that server. They describe the whole configuration, including the type of cellular modem that's embedded in their machines. So based on that information, they decided to see if they could look for that very specific footprint of ESNS machines that are receiving the votes. And they did a scan and they were able to find these systems on the Internet. So they found 9 Wisconsin counties that had systems connected to the Internet, 7 Florida counties, from 4 Michigan counties. They actually found systems in 10 different states, but these were the primary ones. And of course, these are all important critical swing states. So here's the thing. Election officials will tell you, well, the modem transmissions don't matter because we only turn on those modems for a very brief period, less than a minute at the end of the election to transmit. And that's not sufficient time for someone to hack. Any of the technical attack. But more importantly, it turns out these systems aren't just connected for a few minutes after an election. Those back end systems that receive the votes are quite often connected year round. You can see them when they're doing the scans. You can sometimes see them. They come up a couple of weeks. Some of the ones that are only up temporarily will sometimes come up a couple of weeks before the election because they want to test the transmission. And then they leave it on for those weeks before the election. And after the election, they might forget to take it down and it might stay up a couple of other weeks. But there are some that simply never take them down at all. And Wisconsin was one of them. They were on year round. These systems, so what are they? I describe this as a server, but that sounds kind of benign. What is happening is that the The votes are being transmitted, and on the receiving end there's a firewall that's connected to the internet. And behind the firewall, There is this FTP server that the votes are transmitted on. Now that FTP server is supposed to serve as kind of like a DMZ, a safe zone, right? So the votes are deposited and there's supposed to be then no direct connection to the system that actually tabulates the votes. But it turns out that's not the case at all. This is a diagram that ES and S created and handed out to election officials. And so you can see that the votes are coming over the Internet, and they're coming and there's the firewall, and then you see all those wires connected. And you see at the bottom there that EMS, that's the Election Management system. That is the system that tabulates the final results. So even though they say that, that transmission of votes over the Internet is just unofficial, Connected to that system that's receiving those unofficial votes is also the system that is tabulating the official results. What's more, that election management system is also used to program all the voting machines prior to an election. So when, I brought this To ES and S's attention, they didn't then say that nothing is connected to the Internet. What they said was none of those critical systems are pingable from the Internet because there's a firewall in front. So essentially what they're saying is that even though now first they've said that none of these systems are connected to the Internet. And now when they're faced with someone saying, well, they actually are connected, they say, well, they may be configured in some manner that you're showing, but there's a firewall in front of them and therefore, you can't see what's behind the firewall. But if you can find the firewall, then you find the systems that are behind the firewall. The only thing that's protecting anyone from getting into those critical systems behind the firewall are the rules of that firewall that say, only these certain systems can connect to us, only these certain systems can transmit data. That's simply software. It's configuration rules. And if you misconfigure that software, then anything can get into that firewall. And of course, many, many hacks happen because firewalls are misconfigured. Speaker 0: I was part of the team that did the first hands on study of any electronic voting machine used in the US and it was using exactly this machine. And what we found, well, we got one of these machines from a whistleblower, Brought it into a laboratory. Reverse engineered it. And well, here's the result of what we found. We we would run a mock election with George Washington and Benedict Arnold, just like this. And, wanted to know, well, if an attacker that could get malicious software into the machine somehow. Could they change the results? And what we found after reverse engineering the machine was, well, Yeah. There are actually a lot of problems with it. All the records of the vote are contained in, in computer memory. And, an attacker can manipulate the software that's supposed to be running in the machine in a pretty straightforward way. Before every election, officials program the machine with the names of the candidates on the ballot by, installing some that they can change the software running in the machine. There are, unauthenticated software update mechanisms, there are offer overflows and the code that reads the data files from this. There's even an interpreted programming language and the rules for how the votes will be counted are contained in an unauthenticated program contained on the memory card. So through any of those means, An attacker can change the software running on the voting machine and cause the machine to produce whatever election results they want. So that was in about 2007. We, we published the first paper about this. In and that's what we're going to do. And so we're going to have to do that. And so we're going to have to do that. And so we're flows and so forth. There have been hundreds and hundreds of pages of technical reports about US voting machines like this. But even after that, They haven't even updated the software since before the studies I talked about. That's how bad it is. And it's not even just a single model of machine that's the only problem. Country. There are about 52 different models of machines. They fall into essentially 2 styles, ones that scan a piece of paper or ones where the vote, the voter just interacts with the touch screen and many of them have been analyzed now by researchers, Looking for security vulnerabilities. In every single case where a US voting machine has been analyzed by by competent in security researchers. They have found vulnerabilities that would let someone inject malicious software and change election data, every single case. Before every election, election officials have to program the voting machines with who's on the ballot and what are the rules for counting. Well, they make that election programming on a PC workstation somewhere, either at the, at the jurisdiction or at an outside vendor that does it for them. If an attacker can break into that workstation which is called an election management system. They can spread malicious code to all of the memory cards used to program all of the voting machines in the jurisdiction. And those election management system workstations sometimes are connected to the internet, or they're, or the data that's programmed into them passes through an internet connected system. So we're just 1 or 2 hops away from an online attacker. Now how well secured are these systems? Well, here's, a vendor that did the election programming for, in a large fraction of my state in 2016. And we can just take a look at their website to see how secure this is likely to be. You can see, first of all, they don't have any HTTPS. Here are lots of nice, high resolution photographs of their warehouse, in case you want to break in. And perhaps most interestingly, here's their employee directory with everyone's name, job title, email address and photograph. So if I wanted to break into this company, let's say I was the attacker, I'd probably start by forging an email from, let's say, Larry, the president here, to Sue, his administrative assistant, asking her to urgently open an attachment. Now, of course, when she does, that attachment has my malware in it. I have a foothold into their network, and I can try to spread from there to the election management system and to the voting machines in most of the state. Tampering with the national election result in my country it's easier than well, easier than even I thought in 2016. I keep learning things that convince me that the situation is scarier than, than even experts had thought. You identify the states that are most weakly protected and going to be close. Target the computers that are going to program voting machines there, spread malware to machines to change a fraction of the votes, and then rely on the fact that most states, even if they have a paper record, are not going to rigorously use it to check that the computers are right. But the fact is that in close national contests in the US, the result really only hinges on the result in a small number of states. You've heard about the swing states in any given election. The ones that are, really competitive. In such a situation, an attacker can, before the election, identify which states are likely to be close. Try probing all of them in the way that the Russians did the voter registration systems in 2016 and just find the weakest swing states and attack there. So in this way, the American system converts, diversity of implementation into basically this patchwork of strength and weakness that gives attackers a menu of possible places to strike. It makes us weaker in close elections. So just to review, you look at the polls before the election and figure out which states were likely to be close. Probe all of them, find the ones with the weakest protection, then hack into the, election management systems there or at the outside vendors the states use. Once you hack into the election management system, you can spread malicious code to individual voting machines and have your code say, swap 10% of the votes in the places you infected. Then even if the votes are also recorded on a piece of paper, you don't have to worry. Because in most of those states, they're going to just toss the paper out without looking Speaker 5: Modems in voting machines are a bad idea. Those modems are network connections. And that leaves them vulnerable to hacking by anybody who can connect to that network. Speaker 19: ESNS insists While there are 14,000 of its modems in use, there are firewalls separating those modems from the public Internet. Speaker 5: Once a hacker Starts talking to the voting machine through the modem. They can hack the software in the voting machine and make it cheat in future elections. Speaker 17: What is the vehicle for the transmission from the ICP? Is it cellular modem versus VPN? It is a cellular modem that can be configured in a VPN. Right. And we currently in Chicago and Cook County, we work with Verizon to, secure that network. What wireless chipset Slash modem does the hardware have? We support a variety. So, it's really up to the jurisdictions, what technology they want to use, what's compatible with their networks. Speaker 16: Currently, in some jurisdictions, we're using, Basically a modem that is a three d modem, GSM, but we can support multiple varieties of modem that can be. Speaker 17: Including latest 4 gs standards Speaker 14: as well. Speaker 17: So the answers to the next question, is it Speaker 3: 3 gs or 4 gs? Verizon, 8 gs or 2 gs or Sprint, Speaker 5: I'm assuming Speaker 17: all? Yeah, all networks. Speaker 15: Just to Speaker 17: ask a quick question. Yes, I mean, we actually transmit from the ICP in Mongolia as well. So Speaker 7: We're not committed to networks. Speaker 16: And in Puerto Rico, there is 3 vendors because the island is not covered by any by any of the vendors completely. So we use 3 different cellular vendors for some ICPs with this vendor Claro, AT and T, MT Mobile, I think, in the different parts of the app. Speaker 14: More modern attack voting machines. They actually have a mobile phone modem, and to speak, they have a they have a mobile phone mobile phone connectivity to county headquarters. They are sending the results. Speaker 3: Some jurisdictions are relying on uploading election results using cellular modems or, the Internet. That of course introduces another point of vulnerability, not just to the data that's flowing, but also to the software, the devices that, that are being connected. Speaker 1: Many of these voting machines have modems embedded into them. And the modems are used at the end of the election to transmit the vote totals on election night to the county, The, elections office. So these modems contact their cellular modems, and they contact the cellular network, they contact the cell tower. So the cell tower traffic these In our modern times, it actually goes through Internet. It goes through the same kinds of routers and switches that the regular Internet traffic goes to. But also, in between that cell tower and that voting machine, An intruder can, intercept data going to the cell tower and intercept that that communication, that phone call. If you can trick a voting machine into, contacting your device, A fake cellular tower instead of a legitimate tower. You can actually use that connection to get back into the voting machine and get back into the tabulator, and then alter votes and software. Speaker 20: Virginia just stopped Using touch screen computer voting because it's so vulnerable. Speaker 18: We need to look at Speaker 20: all the voting machines. Every secretary of state needs to be, You know, assisted in making sure that they are not being, hacked and and attacked. Speaker 6: I continue to think that our voting machines are too vulnerable. Speaker 21: But researchers have repeatedly demonstrated That ballot recording machines and other voting systems are susceptible to tampering. Speaker 22: Even hackers with limited prior knowledge, tools, and resources are able to breach voting machines In a matter of minutes. Speaker 23: In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted votes for certain candidates or switched votes from 1 candidate to another. Speaker 21: The biggest seller of voting machines is doing something that violates cyber security 101, directing that you install remote access software, which would make a machine like that, you know, a magnet for fraudsters and hackers. Speaker 24: These voting machines can be hacked quite easily. Speaker 25: You could easily Hack into them. It makes it seem like all these states are doing different things, but in fact 3 companies are controlling that. It is the individual voting machines That some pose that pose some of the greatest risks. Speaker 26: There are a lot of states that are dealing with antiquated machines, Right? Which are vulnerable to being hacked. Speaker 24: Workers were able to easily hack into an electronic voting machine. It was possible to switch votes. 43% Speaker 21: of American voters use voting machines that researchers have found have serious security flaws, Including backdoors. Speaker 3: We know how vulnerable now our systems were. We know I know the hackathon that took place last year, where virtually every machine was broken into fairly quickly. Speaker 26: I actually held a demonstration for my colleagues here at the capitol, where we brought in, folks Who, before our eyes, hacked election machines, those that are not those that are being used in many states. Speaker 22: Aging systems also frequently rely on unsupported software, like Windows XP in 2000, which may not receive regular security patches and are thus more vulnerable To the latest methods of cyber attack. Speaker 24: In a close presidential election, they just need to hack 1 swing state, or maybe 1 or 2, Or maybe just a few counties in one swing step. Speaker 27: I'm very concerned that you could have a hack that finally went through. You have 21 states that were hacked into. They didn't find out about it for a year. Right now, we have over a dozen dozen states That either don't have any backup paper ballots or only have them partially. Do you think that our adversaries don't know what those states are? Of course, they know what those states are. And if we have a close election in the general election, in a presidential race, and one state's out withstanding And their ballot boxes get hacked into, their elections get hacked into, we will have absolutely no backup.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

25/ In effect, the left was allowed to discuss the vulnerabilities of voting machines after the 2016 election, and the right was banned from social media platforms for discussing those very same vulnerabilities after the 2020 election.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Virginia has stopped using touchscreen computer voting due to vulnerability, highlighting the need to assess all voting machines for potential hacking. Researchers have shown that ballot recording machines and other systems are susceptible to tampering, even by hackers with limited resources. Instances of electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleting or switching votes have been reported. The leading seller of voting machines has violated cybersecurity principles by installing remote access software, making them attractive to fraudsters and hackers. The control of voting machines by just three companies poses significant risks. Many states still use outdated and hackable machines, leaving the election system vulnerable to interference. The lack of backup paper ballots and reliance on unsupported software further exacerbate the security flaws.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Virginia just stopped using touchscreen computer voting because it's so vulnerable. Right. We need to look at all the voting machines. Every secretary of state needs to be, you know, assisted in making sure that they are not being hacked and and attacked. Speaker 1: I continue to think that our voting machines are too vulnerable. Speaker 2: Researchers have repeatedly demonstrated that ballot recording machines and other voting systems are susceptible to tampering. Speaker 0: Even hackers with limited prior knowledge, tools and resources are able to breach voting machines in a matter of minutes. Speaker 3: In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted votes for certain candidates or switch votes from 1 candidate to another. Speaker 4: The biggest seller of voting machines is doing something that violates cybersecurity 101, directing that you install Remote access software, which would make a machine like that, you know, a magnet for fraudsters and hackers. Speaker 5: These voting machines can be hacked quite easily. Speaker 2: You could easily Hack into them. It makes it seem like all these states are doing different things, but in fact 3 companies are controlling that. It is the individual voting machines That some pose, that pose some of the greatest risks. Speaker 6: There are a lot of states that are dealing with antiquated machines, right, which are vulnerable to being hacked. Speaker 5: The workers were able to easily hack into an electronic voting machine. Speaker 4: It was possible to switch votes. 43% of American voters use voting machines that researchers have found have serious security flaws, Including backdoors. Speaker 7: We know how vulnerable now our systems were. We know I know the hackathon that took place last year, Where virtually every machine was broken into fairly quickly. Speaker 6: I actually held a demonstration for my colleagues here at the capitol, where we brought in, folks Who, before our eyes, hacked election machines, those that are not those that are being used in many states. Speaker 8: Aging systems also frequently rely On unsupported software, like Windows XP in 2000, which may not receive regular security patches and are thus more vulnerable To the latest methods of cyber attack. Speaker 5: In a close presidential election, they just need to hack 1 swing state or maybe 1 or 2 Or maybe just a few counties in one swing state. Speaker 2: I'm very concerned that you could have a hack that finally went through. You have 21 states that were hacked into. They didn't find out about it for a year. Right now, we have over a dozen dozen states that either don't have any backup paper ballots Or only have them partially. You think that our adversaries don't know what those states are? Of course, they know what those states are. And if we have a close election in the general election, in a presidential race, and one state's out withstanding and their Ballot boxes get hacked into. Their elections get hacked into. We will have absolutely no backup. Stalin was unconcerned about the vote. After all, he explained, he said that who voted was completely unimportant. What was Extraordinarily important, in his words, was who would count the votes and how. It is time to put politics aside and come together to secure the future of our election. So whether you're a 4 star general, A 4th grade teacher or a computer engineer at Foursquare, this is an issue that unites us. Speaker 8: In at least 40 states, elections are carried out using machines that are at least a decade old. And like any technology, -They're susceptible to increasing failure with age. Some state officials have had to turn to eBay to find critical components like dot matrix printers, Decades old storage devices and analog modems, aging systems also frequently rely on unsupported software Like Windows XP in 2000, which may not receive regular security patches and are thus more vulnerable to the latest Methods of cyber attack. Speaker 3: In 2016, state election websites in Illinois and Arizona were hacked by intruders who installed malware and downloaded sensitive voter information. Speaker 6: It is worth fighting for integrity in our election system, which means that they are free from interference by a hostile Or an unfriendly nation. Let's put the resources into upgrading the state's election systems. Because what we know is this. There are a lot of states that are dealing with antiquated machines, right, which are vulnerable to being hacked. I sit on the senate intelligence committee and senate homeland security committee. And we receive all kinds of information about the vulnerabilities to our national Security. We are vulnerable in terms of foreign interference with our elections. It's my understanding that some of the election system Vendors have required states to sign agreements, that prevent or inhibit independent, security testing. There's a saying that I'm sure Many of you have heard, which is the you know the difference between being hacked and not being hacked? Is knowing you've been hacked. Speaker 0: And they are still looking for ways to steal information about Voter registration, for example. There are some text experts in Silicon Valley Valley with whom I have met who say that, You know, maybe what they'll do this next time is to really disrupt the actual election. Shut down the servers that you send results to. Interfere with the operation of voting machines because still too many of them are linked to the Internet. So there we are still very vulnerable. Speaker 9: I mean, I can tell you in Virginia, when I was governor, I had to replace all the machines. Because I remember when I first voted when I went to Richmond, moved down as governor, I remember I kept voting in the senate race, kept voting for the Democrat. Republican name kept coming up. Three times that happened. Speaker 1: What do Speaker 4: you mean kept Coming up. Speaker 9: So I you know, we had the touch screens. I was voting for Mark Warner, our senator, and Ed Gosphy's name was light up. Happened to me 3 times. Finally, the 4th time, Mark Damon, I quickly hit vote, and I got out of there. You know, all the cameras are looking at me like this guy doesn't know how to vote. I mean, what's going on? So then I had an investigation done, and listen to this. I brought in some technology experts. They were able to hack into our machines from off-site In about 5 or 6 minutes, and within 4 minutes, they were able to change a vote. IDD certified all the machines. Now in Virginia, we have paper ballots. Speaker 4: 43% of American voters use voting machines that researchers have found have Serious security flaws, including backdoors. These companies are accountable to no one. They won't answer basic questions about their cybersecurity practices, and the biggest companies Won't answer any questions at all. 5 states have no paper trail, And that means there is no way to prove the numbers the voting machines put out are legitimate. So much for cybersecurity 101. The vast majority of 10,000 election jurisdictions Nationwide, use election management systems that run on old software That is soon gonna be out of date and ripe for exploitation by hackers according To an exhaustive analysis by the Associated Press, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Florida, Iowa, Indiana, Arizona, and North Carolina, among others, Are all at risk. Even the state of Georgia, which just passed legislation to buy new voting machines, is on track to buy equipment that suffers from this significant cybersecurity weakness. Let's say the election is decided by a small percentage And people in America don't think that the election was fair. The effect that would have On our 200 year experiment in self governance, our democratic system Would take a real hit. Our elections weren't secure last week And they sure as heck aren't secure this week. And anybody who says otherwise It's either selling the voting machines or simply has a malicious intent towards our elections. At one point in the intelligence committee, both sides seemed to agree that no votes were changed In the 2016 election, and I said, the experts I talk to say that Until you have a forensic analysis of a vote, until you go in there and scrub the whole system, You can't really say that. So they're giving these voting machines specifically the hack into how successful were they? Speaker 1: Well, the the ongoing record Was, they hacked within 90 minutes of, being, being in the same space as the voting machines. Now these are not hackers that are actually touching the machines. They're doing this from across the room, on, on Internet like connections. But what it demonstrated, Pedro, is that the machines that we count on to make the basic connection between the American voter And the election results are vulnerable if they're in any way connected to the Internet. Speaker 4: And so when you say hacked, what were they able to do once they gained Access to the machines. Speaker 1: All sorts of things. They could manipulate, the outcome of the vote, they could manipulate the tally, they could delete the tally, and and they could compromise the vote in any number of ways. Just it was limited only by the hackers' creativity. Just how vulnerable Speaker 10: the machines were. I mean, what we found is that These machines were purchased by, local voting authorities, state and local voting authorities maybe 10 years ago. In many cases, the software and the hardware have not been updated, so they're as vulnerable as an old laptop That we might have, in in your home that you no longer use because it's just so out of date. Then what we found is that the supply chain for these these machines is largely un plotted. I mean, We found parts from China. We found, digital electronic parts from all over the world. By way of hacking, there's the potential that the actual vote tally could be compromised. So votes could be changed from this to that. Or votes could be suppressed, votes could be deleted, votes could be added, so you could actually change the tally itself.
DecentFiJC
Posted - March 19, 2023 at 2:55 PM
Saved - May 25, 2023 at 2:10 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
NASED, CISAgov, and EACgov are warned not to destroy or alter records. They will be remembered as cautionary tales. Chris Krebs will regret existing, having a Twitter account, and his relationship with David Becker. The EAC final report from its Congressional Task Force on Election Security in January 2018 reveals collusion to lie about the true threat to our elections. NASS tells task force they need HAVA, Brennan Center, Risk-Limiting Audits, and EACDHS. EFxScout1League is credited for source work on the EAC report.

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

Dear @NASEDorg, @CISAgov and @EACgov, You’re all about to have a really, really bad time. Don’t even think about destroying or altering your records. Any of them. It’ll only make things worse for you now. This is the part where you get enshrined in history as cautionary tales.

@ProjectVirginia - The Virginia Project

Resignations at ERIC starting mere days after we started looking at what they actually do screams of mens rea.

@ProjectVirginia - The Virginia Project

Pull Virginia out of ERIC now. https://justthenews.com/government/state-houses/gop-states-withdraw-voter-roll-org-linked-leftists-over-concerns-partisan

3 more red states ditch voter data-sharing collective as Trump rips 'fools game for Republicans' "All Republican Governors should immediately pull out of ERIC, the terrible Voter Registration System that 'pumps the rolls' for Democrats and does nothing to clean them up," the former president wrote on his Truth Social platform. justthenews.com

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

As we go along, you’ll find that Chris Krebs is going to massively regret some things. *An initial list of notable regrets includes: 1. Existing. 2. Having a Twitter account. 3. His relationship with David Becker.

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

Oh look, it’s the EAC final report from its Congressional Task Force on Election Security — January 2018. Hey, there’s Bennie Thompson from the J6 Committee! Seems he was also the Co-Chair of this “task force”. Special thanks to those new “persons of interest” at the bottom.🤣

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

So much GOLD to unpack: -the inception of “critical infrastructure” verbiage as ODNI/CIA/FBI/NSA all collude to lie about the true threat to our elections (Russia) in report (1/6/17) -NASS tells task force they need HAVA $$$ -Brennan Center🤣 -Risk-Limiting Audits -EAC/DHS🤣

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

MASSIVE props to @EFxScout1League for source work on the EAC report 🔥🔥🔥

AzPinkLady
Posted - June 29, 2023 at 4:03 PM
Saved - August 4, 2023 at 6:38 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Title: Unveiling the Intricate Web of Election Integrity: Patrick Byrne's Revelations Introduction: In the realm of election integrity, one name has emerged as a key figure, Patrick Byrne. Renowned for his relentless pursuit of exposing Wall Street corruption, Byrne's investigative journey spans 15 years, with his alarm bells ringing louder since the 2020 election. Today, we delve into the fascinating life story of this entrepreneur, his battles with cancer, and his involvement in significant events that have shaped our political landscape. Unveiling Byrne's Life Story: From humble beginnings to entrepreneurial success, Patrick Byrne's life has been a testament to resilience and determination. Overcoming multiple battles with cancer while pursuing his studies and degrees, Byrne's tenacity has been unwavering. However, it is his involvement in pivotal political events that truly captures our attention. Byrne's Role in the Russia Collusion Hoax: One significant chapter in Byrne's story is his role in the Russia collusion hoax. He firmly believes that this fabricated narrative would have been employed against any Republican candidate. Through his experiences, Byrne sheds light on the intricate workings of political manipulation and the potential consequences it holds for our democratic processes. Involvement in FBI Dealings and Facilitating a Bribe: Another intriguing aspect of Byrne's journey is his involvement in FBI dealings and his facilitation of a bribe for Hillary Clinton. These revelations highlight the complexities and questionable practices that can occur within the corridors of power. Understanding these events is crucial in comprehending the broader context of Byrne's pursuit of election integrity. Unveiling the Iwo Jima Event and Biden's Bribes: Byrne's relentless pursuit of truth led him to expose the Iwo Jima event, where he shed light on Biden's alleged bribes and the government's awareness of foreign interference in elections. Despite facing attempts to silence him, Byrne persisted in his mission to uncover the truth. These revelations provide valuable insights into the potential vulnerabilities within our electoral system. Trump's Strategy and the Betrayal: Aware of the interference, former President Donald Trump was presented with options to protect the country. The plan involved senators investigating the election, but their betrayal ultimately led to the certification of Biden's victory. However, the full details of the events that unfolded on January 6th are yet to be revealed. Trump's strategy aimed to avoid triggering a civil war while simultaneously exposing the infiltration of the deep state. Staying Informed and Engaged: As the war for election integrity continues, it is crucial for us to remain informed, calm, and engaged in our responsibilities as citizens. Loy Brunson, in a recent interview, emphasized the importance of showing support to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) amidst claims of foreign interference. Over 80,000 letters have already been sent, with hopes of reaching 80 million. The pursuit of justice has exposed instances of crooked judges and government agencies going rogue, underscoring the significance of Byrne's revelations. Spreading the Word and Making History: In a media landscape that often shies away from such controversial topics, it is imperative to make Byrne's article go viral. Whether it is through downloading it for free from DeepCapture or purchasing a hard copy on Amazon, spreading the word is essential. By doing so, we can collectively make history and contribute to the ongoing pursuit of election integrity. Conclusion: Patrick Byrne's journey is a complex tapestry of experiences that intertwine with the pursuit of election integrity. From his early battles with cancer to his involvement in significant political events, Byrne's revelations shed light on potential vulnerabilities within our democratic processes. As we navigate these challenging times, staying informed, engaged, and supportive of institutions like SCOTUS becomes paramount. Together, we can make a difference and overcome the obstacles that lie ahead.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

@PatrickByrne has provided a “clean link” to the article I mentioned the other day. “Domestic Extremist #1” https://patrickbyrne.locals.com/upost/4217811/dhs-domestic-extremist-1-patrick-byrne-comes-clear I want to do a thread on this to make shareable tidbits because this is a long. I hope I do him Justice. It is very informative & I highly recommend reading the whole thing. Please, share this with everyone. Especially off Twitter. This story is THE biggest story of our time. And I’m counting on you guys to help me get it out there. Especially outside of our bubble. This story is why I have a snippet of Byrne in my bio pointing to “14 minutes that will change your life”. THIS will unite the country- or at least it should. Because this isn’t about Trump. This isn’t about R vs D. This is should be a concern of every American. As always, please be patient with me while I peace all of this together for you.

DHS Domestic Extremist #1 Patrick Byrne Comes Clean My most revealing post ever. Now you know... the rest of the story. Please spread widely, as in our Information War, this is a hypersonic missile. Only chance you have to strike with it is now. patrickbyrne.locals.com

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

I’m going to cover the article first. But I want to take you on another journey about Byrne, that many may not know. There are many pieces to curate. So this won’t be a “fast” thread. I will let you know when I get to “the end for now”. Byrne is an ever evolving story. Every interview he goes he drops little nuggets. Rarely are they all in one spot. And it depends on what audience he is communicating with. So I am confident there is “more to the story” that will emerge.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Byrne “began” his journey to “notoriety” with his exposing Wall Street days. There was some dirty dealings going on with short sales. You can listen to an explanation here. The journey is rather more complicated & nuanced than this little video. And that story dove tails into his election integrity story. https://youtu.be/BdBe5_8z53A Much like his election integrity journey, he was poo-poo’d away for YEARS. Not until 2008 & Allen Greenspan testified in front of congress was Patrick Vindicated And much like the Wall Street story, he will be vindicated again & history will remember him kindly, to put it mildly.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Byrne has rightfully been named the “kingpin” of the election integrity movement. He has been sounding the alarm since right after Nov 3, 2020 election. If you go to Patrick’s Locals channel and sort by “oldest” you will see he went on an alternative media blitz to get the word out since he was persona en grata with MSM You can start here https://patrickbyrne.locals.com/upost/618978/11-17-2020-patrick-byrne-interview-2020-election-was-rigged-and-changed-using-5-us-counties-newsm Many would be surprised that he has been investigating for 15 years

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker, a well-versed American patriot, has been aware of the sketchiness of the election systems for about 15 or 16 years. They have been working with a group of people who have uncovered some significant findings. In 2018, the Dallas election had irregularities, which prompted the Texas governor to form a panel to investigate. This panel hired a cybersecurity group to study the irregularities, specifically on Dominion Machines. Over the past two years, this group has reverse-engineered the process of stealing an election using this equipment. The speaker has been associated with them since August and has been actively supporting their efforts for the past 4 or 5 months.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now I'm so glad to have you on my show. You're a very well versed American patriot, and you have been for quite a while. I saw you pop up a couple years on you. We talked about when you talked about bowling machines a couple of years ago? Speaker 1: Well, I actually have. I've been in on this for about 15 or 16 years, how sketchy our election, systems are far sketchier than most Americans understand. But so I you could've heard me a couple years ago saying something about it. Yeah. But now you said Yeah. Go ahead, please. Speaker 0: You you went completely down the rabbit hole. Right? You kept digging and digging and digging. Now you've come up with some gold at the end of the tunnel. Am I right? Speaker 1: I dig and dig, I came out the far side. Yeah. Yes, we have well, I'm blessed to be working with some people who are Who really have the picks and the axes and the shovels, and they have come up with some real gold. In fact, What's happened is in 2018, not to jump ahead too much. In 2018, the Dallas election had irregularities in it. And the Texas governor formed a blue ribbon panel to study these irregularities, which are the kinds of Regularities we're seeing now, it was done on Dominion Machines, and they hired us that governor's panel hired a cybersecurity group to study it and figure out what the heck happened. And so that group has had 2 years to reverse engineer how you steal an election Using this equipment while the rest of America's had a couple weeks at best to try to follow it. This group has had 2 years. I've been associated with them since August, them and another group and a various collection of white hat hackers and and just kind of, You know, and been supporting it. So I I've been on this very specifically for about 4 or 5 months now.
11/17/2020 Patrick Byrne Interview: 2020 Election Was Rigged And Changed Using 5 US Counties - ... Dr. Patrick Michael Byrne, the founder and former CEO of Overstock, said he has evidence that the presidential election was stolen from President Trump. Read related article on DeepCapture.com: https://www.deepcapture.com/2020/11/newsmaxtv-breaks-cone-of-silence-millions-hear-story-there-first/ Quoted from article: patrickbyrne.locals.com

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Patrick “invited” everyone to come to the capital on the 4th, 5th & 6th. We now know the event was hijacked by organizers led by a political operative who “took over” the event & the Feds. There were a lot of “operations” going that day that ended with the loudest narrative against those Americans who understood 2020 was stolen. In large part from Bryne’s efforts to inform the public. True to his nature, he offers to pay for all damage & face the charges given to peaceful protestors. https://twitter.com/patrickbyrne/status/1661845151549931520?s=46&t=O8LXe-b2zwQWLx95iqRDnA…

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

The next few pages are a fascinating tale of his life. Byrne is the poster-child for “you were born for such a time as this”. His unique life & life experiences put him in the position of a great education, mentors that people would pay big money to get lessons from & life experiences that gave him a unique set of skills. I encourage you to read up on his life going from a humble beginnings to a very rich man based solely on hard work & good business decisions. His journey to Overstock included going to China & Thailand to study. His family took a gamble with an unknown investor at that time, Warren Buffet, & it paid off big time. But if you have listened to enough of his interviews, as I have, you can tell he has remained humble & kind. I have to admit, I like his Irish temper when he gets fired up. I wouldn’t want to be at the end of any fisticuffs with him. In another interview, he talked about bicycling across the country, twice. His adventures with friends. One of which, a basketball star, was murdered by his own brother. I hate to cut his life experience to a short description, but I could do a whole thread on just that. I’ll leave that to the historians, bibliographers, & screenwriters. I did found it interesting in this article that through his education & the people he was surrounded by, he knew something wasn’t quite right in the leftist circles. And sought to understand it. In this interview he gives more insight into who he is. He knew by age 10 he wanted to think about bigger issues. How many 10 year old do you know that are deep thinkers? https://youtu.be/kALNSFPe5lQ This interview also gives you insight to his forward thinking. He was “drop shipping” before Amazon, using fair trade before fair trade was a thing, developed bitcoin, and blockchain (see screenshot of comments…bigger than the steam engine). Our elections would be secure on blockchain, IMO, that’s where we are headed.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

An inspiring aspect of Byrne is his battle with his health. He has had over 100 surgeries. I believe this last one he just had this year was #114 or 115! It is unique in itself that he has battled cancer multiple times & won, but as you will soon see, he was fighting for our country through it all. I believe that higher purpose gave him the fight & God obviously blessed him to continue. And through his hospital years, he studied. Worked towards his degrees. He did not wallow away watching tv. This is what men used to be made of before soyboys became more prolific ☹️

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

I call Patrick the ultimate “people watcher”. He studies, he watches, he puts pieces together. That skill lends well to his entrepreneurial leadership but also his skills in “helping Uncle Sam”. This article goes into his entrepreneurial endeavors after his education & cancer. But in no reality, he started in high school. When you listen to the interview I posted above, you will hear him talk about a Christmas tree business. He’s no slacker.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

This is where we enter the “helping save America” life mission. The article states in 2005 he started with the Wall Street battle. But, I seem to remember an interview where he stated it was about 2 or 3 years prior in investigations & people coming to him with information. I’d like to pint out two things: 1) Byrne took it very seriously that “old people” were getting ripped off by Wall Street short sale crooks. He says old people but I believe it was “the little guy” in general. And 2) in 2006 a DOJ guy, Breem-got the info, quit & called Byrne to tell him he had 30-40 people behind him. This is also the same year of the infamous letter from the Judiciary Committee that I listed Byrne to root out the cancer in our government. I’m attaching this interview with Tore because, not only do they discuss the letter, that she previously didn’t know about, but she adds some more details/background on things you should know. https://patrickbyrne.locals.com/upost/619397/12-07-2020-patrick-byrne-interview-sting-op-deep-state-take-down-2020-election-fraud-tore-says

12/07/2020 Patrick Byrne Interview: Sting Op Deep State Take Down 2020 Election Fraud - Tore Says December 7, 2020: Tore Says Interview with Patrick Byrne, founder of Overstock - Sting Op Deep State Take Down. In this rare interview, former Overstock CEO shares he was commissioned by the bi-partisan 2006 Senate Intel Committee to take down the Deep State. He has an integral role in the sting operation to trap all those involved in Election Official Fraud. READ The Story of Deep Capture here ➡️ https://www.deepcapture.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/deepcapture-the-story-v1.pdf patrickbyrne.locals.com

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Speaking of forward thinking…did you know Patrick was one of the original ESA advocates? He has long advised for educational vouchers to allow parents to choose their child’s education. It also speaks volumes about his character that Friedman want Patrick to carry on his name & his legacy after he died. Wikipedia is poop, but this gives a pretty good summary of the Friedman’s accomplishments https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milton_Friedman

Milton Friedman - Wikipedia en.m.wikipedia.org

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Enter “Russiagate” In 2019, Byrne went public with what he knew & what he was asked to do that helped perpetuate the Trump-Russia collusion lie. THE LIE that has severely divided our country. If we are to save our country, this needs to be understood by all. Not only the Lie itself, but the lengths certain people have gone to for YEARS to keep it alive (eg Shifty Schiff & the lying media!) Please take note of this Warren Buffet nugget. I know many have questioned Warren Buffet. I think this passage shows what side Buffet is on. He didn’t get super angry because he was left out of the coup. 😉

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Patrick has stated, the Russia collusion hoax would have been used on ANY Republican that rose to the top. It was “Can-O-Russia-Scandal” taken out & shaken up to spray all over Republicans. But, it was Trump, the grassroots populist candidate that made it work so well. A man people loved to hate. Trump is also the reason it didn’t work well on the grassroots. He was the perfect man to create polar opposite reactions. Take note of the paragraph that the agents tell Byrne to forget about the whole Hillary $18M bribery with the threat of death. Which, Byrne didn’t take to kindly to. In the interview I posted above, he tells of the death threats he got during his Wall Street days. His battle with his health made him unafraid of death, as he states in the article, he’s met death at least 500 times. Since the YouTube interview regarding WallStreet, he since acquired the ultimate insurance policy. The mother load of blackmail information collected by the bad guys who killed Seth Rich, perpetrated the Russia Hoax & covered for Hillary’s emails.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker reveals that the Department of Justice (DOJ) has been investigating them and subpoenaing people who know them, including their lawyer. They claim to possess a large amount of information, referred to as the "mother lode," which they have stored on servers overseas as an insurance policy. They mention the death of Seth Rich, alleging that Rod Rosenstein ordered MS-13 members to mug and kill him. The speaker also discusses a joint FBI and OGA operation against Russian hacking groups, which was initially based in Frankfurt and later moved to Baltimore under Rod Rosenstein's supervision. They claim to have obtained thousands of documents and audio recordings related to these matters.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here's another one, and it's come to me in the last 24 hours. And I'm gonna be open about this because my life might be involved. The DOJ in the last 3 weeks has come sniffing around. They're subpoenaing people who know me. They're subpoenaing my lawyer for grand jury testimony. It's been my lawyer. I think justice Payne is your lawyer for grand jury testimony. Had a real beef with you. And only that, it's the southern district of New York, which is a bunch of Obama guys. So Speaker 1: Makes. Speaker 0: Yeah. It's a bunch of Obama guys. They're gonna come after me, so I'm gonna make something clear. I have the mother lode, and I'm not gonna describe to your view your viewers what the mother lode is, but I have the mother lode, terabytes and terabytes of information that would keep an army of blackmailers in in what happened was, well, anyway and I'm not going to use it. I'm not threatening to use it. I'm not going to use it, but if I start it's already overseas uploaded into different servers under dead men's switches, I'm gonna and it's gonna stay there. That's my insurance policy because if these guys come after me unjustly and, and I'm not threatening them, but they know they know the story between us. And if they come after me for the things that I did, they put me in some Crazy positions, uncle Sam did. And I followed my heart and patriotism as best I could. If they're mad at me, They wanna go to war then but let me tell you one of the things that's in there. I wanna tell you something that's come out today just to give you a taste. Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 0: And this is I would own I'm only making this public because it's already broken today. You know about the death of Seth Rich. Right? Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: Do you know who that was? Since Rich was killed by on Rod Rosenstein as well. Rod Rosenstein had 2 DEA agents, who themselves went to 2 MS 13 people and gave them an assignment to catch, Seth Rich, who was carrying a thumb Seth Rich always carried a certain thumb drive on him with a bunch of very important things, and there was no one to always be on him. And so 2 MS 13 guys were sent to mug him on the orders of Rod Rosenstein and 2 guys from the DEA, and they mugged him and but it went badly and ended up killing him. Those 2 MS 13 guys were gunned down on 2 days later in a parking lot in South Carolina. Now I'm always saying this because there's already somebody leaked this this morning, but I have all the document. And so the documentations for that for that got out and I saw somebody else has already put it up on a site redacted, Assupably impacted, so I'm just endorsing. That actually happened. Well, that is one drop in a swimming pool of Wow. Terabytes and terabytes of thousands and thousands and thousands of documents and audio recordings that have been brought to me. And the same thing happened that happened when I fought Wall Street 15 years ago is that people came out of the woods and started telling me things. And one of the things I've done over the last 3 months while I've been working this issue is I've obtained all of that. And what it is, I'll even tell you more. What it is, I'm gonna be completely honest, there was a operator in Frankfurt consulate. Our consulate in Frankfurt had an operation that was operating against the Russian hacking group, Cozy Bear and and, Fuzzy Bear, And it got moved to Baltimore, and it was the it was called Baltimore Station over in the Frankfurt consulate. It was a joint FBI and OGA operation. And the people involved over there in Frankfurt Alright. Quite an interesting list and I'll get back to that. It got moved back to Baltimore where it was in Baltimore Station, Operating under US attorney at the time, Rod Rosenstein, and the people involved in this project includes Include, first, 2 federal agents Speaker 1: who are now in prison. Speaker 0: Trump doesn't get any information. He is surrounded by People who are Trump knows nothing of what I'm saying. I mean, he he could have been explained to him. He's just got people who are buffering and keeping everything away from him, so you can't pass what he knows. But let me tell you, this Baltimore station, Rod Rosenstein was over it. There was an agent called Bianca who worked there. The name ring a bell? Pianca? Speaker 1: Yeah. Pianca. Bill Pianca. Agent no. Joe Pianca. He was on the, Flynn case that in his three zero two went missing. Speaker 0: And it was he and Peter Strach And Peter Strach. And and then set up that day when he was first in the in Then as a national security adviser and Comey has bragged, oh, we figured they weren't very well organized. We sent some people over to in that was Peter Strzok and Joe Pianka. Joe Pianka previously left was working in his Baltimore station station, 2 feds who later went to prison for stealing Bitcoin from the government and another fed who another guy who went on and opened a company called CrowdStrike, Sean Henry. CrowdStrike Mhmm. Is basically a cyber security group for the DNC. So a bunch of people whose names surfaced 7 or 8 years later in this other mischief were actually all together in this group. And what this group had in Baltimore was complete access to all the secrets of the US government. They were tied in to a a node or some I don't understand enough of the NSA and how it all works, but they had this special node where they could download and access all the secrets, and they build up a treasure trove a treasure trove of blackmail material. I now have that entire thing. Tens, hundreds of terabytes. I have it. It includes information under I have multiple copies on foreign servers under kill switches, under dead man switches. It includes information as recent as live as a couple days ago And you can't believe when the word gets out of how this really happened, put it this way, I was told 1 guy was waterboarded with kerosene to try to make him give up this by federal agents in a in a in the within in domestic soil to make him give up this location. We have the entire thing. It's now perfectly safe. It has been uploaded into different foreign servers and under my dead man switch. So, now all that Said, I sure hope I can return someday to my formally, reasonably, cordial relationship with uncle Sam.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

A summary in a nutshell for your friends that don’t like to read or don’t have time👇🏻 https://rumble.com/v1sa2h4-14-minutes-that-will-blow-your-mind.html A intriguing telling to listen in the car on the way to work, is Spy Affair on Wondery. https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/spy-affair/id1557382427

14 Minutes That Will Change Your Life Patrick Byrne head of The American Project at the ReAwakening American Tour in Branson MO 11/5 Patrick was given an amnesty letter 16 years ago to do whatever it took, except murder, to save America. rumble.com
‎Spy Affair on Apple Podcasts A charismatic Russian woman arrives in the US on a mission to improve relations between the two countries, and she soon makes some powerful friends. But who is Maria Butina? And who is she working for? As Maria gets closer to the rich and connected she also attracts the attention of the FBI. In the… podcasts.apple.com

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

In the article, Byrne points to this snippet on his rumble channel that confirms his past FBI dealings. I’d love to have @ChuckGrassley & @TGowdySC come out publicly & confirm the letter. to shut down the deepstate lies & skeptics. https://rumble.com/v2u1zek-us-attorney-acknowledges-patrick-byrne-on-bongino.html The man in this video playing the clip is a source Byrne has used early on the release info. He was the source I heard about the white hat hackers Byrne employs & works with. (More on that later). But for the life of me, I can’t remember his name to find that video. So if anyone knows, please leave in the comments.

US Attorney Acknowledges Patrick Byrne on Bongino In August 2019 retired United States Attorny Brett Tolman went on Fox News and confirmed some basics of Patrick Byrne's story. rumble.com

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Byrne had a history of helping Uncle Sam reach peaceful outcomes. So his handlers having him continue involvement with Maria in July 2015 when he report interaction with her at a Trump speech wouldn’t have been out of the ordinary. He states he had 60% hopeful that this could be good for USA/Russia relations, 30% concern what Maria was up to sniffing around Rs & 10% reserved that there may be an opportunity to further flush out the cancer (remember his ultimate mission bestowed upon him from the judiciary committee) The Feds had warned Hillary away from Maria, but allowed her to “court” several Rs. What confirmed Byrne’s suspicions is they told Byrne to allow a meeting between Don Jr & Maria to “play out”. So by Nov 2015, he knew what the Feds were up to with her….a set up for the Rs.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

He romances her, on behest of the Feds. They are so cute…they used Luminosity daily scores to “flirt”. So there ya go ladies…Byrne appreciates a brilliant kind. He states he really did appreciate Maria’s intellect.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

By Thanksgiving of 2015, the Feds now tell him they want him to facilitate a bribe for Hillary. That in the investigations they were doing, they had to show a propensity to that behavior. So he was to arrange a meeting with “the bag man”. Which he successfully did. 10 minutes in a hotel room of Hillary’s assistant that doesn’t show up on her schedule. https://youtu.be/lR60-2MaJxc

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

February 2016 enters CIA Brennan go between. Byrne’s informed of a 2008 law change that allowed the CIA to take over FBI functions for Russian related incidents. The 3rd goon warns Byrne to forget the whole Hillary bribe thing on threat of death. As I’ve stated before, this Irishman didn’t take to kindly to that. And waited for his opportunity for “pay back” for being used to set up Maria/Rs & being threatened. Fast forward, & they ask him to rekindle the relationship with Maria, after he abruptly ended it last time, which he does. And uses this opportunity to get Brennan & Obama to sign off on the rape & murder of Maria. (That tidbit is the the video “14 minutes to change your life”) Ultimately, we know what happens to her - she had the SWAT team descend on her home she gets locked in a windowless box for 18 months being fed slip through a slot. He does express regret at using Maria. Byrne’s guilt got to him so he gave her $1B in bitcoin. I hear she’s in Parliament in Russia now.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

The reason I think Byrne called this article an “Iwo Jima” event is for two reasons: 1) He’s all in. He just laid out everything in one spot. He stated in the article, he planned to take this all to his grave. And he’s telling what he knows, just enough to get the point across. And as he stated in the previous video above - he has a butt load of dirt on all these people. 2) He added context/addition info he hadn’t said before. For instance… more Biden bribes 👇🏻 It’s imperative that people understand what this means against all Americans. And it’s our job to get it out. In 2019, Byrne tried to get the info out. But they laughed at him & brushed it under the rug. https://youtu.be/BMn2reDJsuY There were 2 journalists in particular who were told the WHOLE story & they were too week to publish it. https://rumble.com/v1s8dxe-who-had-the-facts-russia-collusion-story-is-a-lie.html

Who Had The FACTS Russia Collusion Story IS A LIE Patrick Byrne Head of the American Project at the ReAwaken America Tour in Branson MO 11/5 He caught the Deepstate & exposes all of them. Look for the full video on my channel. These 2 journalists wer rumble.com

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

3) Byrne lays out the time line that it was KNOWN by our government that foreign interference happened in our elections. Put a pin in this. I’ll be back later with more…

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

You likely haven’t been following Byrne & watching all his interviews. I must confess…I “knew” he knew things. I had stumbled upon his Wall Street fight during that time. I thought it interesting because I had lost a chunk of change in day trading & sought to understand the “system” better. I knew as soon as my money hit the system “they saw it”. I had careful analyzed & put in my short position. 1 tick, they took me out & changed direction. I knew right then the system was rigged. So when Byrne popped on scene again I took note. I want to take a journey to piece together some things for you that you may have missed or forgotten about.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Remember the screenshot of the article above that outlined the timeline that our government knew about foreign interference? They KNEW 2020 was going to be stolen. How? because white hat guys stopped the steal in 2016 to give us more time. The deepstate plan was for Obama to be president for 24 years! His first 8, Hillary’s 8 (controlled by Operation Snow Globe) & Michelle’s 8. Had Hillary won, we would be a totalitarian socialist country right now, we’ll on our way to the pint of no return.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2016, there was controversy surrounding the hacking and recount of voting machines in Michigan and Wisconsin. Hillary Clinton was upset because the machines she had hacked got unhacked, and Jill Stein demanded a recount. It was believed that Hillary expected the same treatment as Joe Biden in the election. She had been promised that the game would be rigged for her, but it didn't happen. This caused her to lose her mind and throw things. In 2016, someone counterhacked the people who were going to hack on Hillary's behalf, but that didn't happen this time. The speakers know who did it but will save that for another discussion.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, if we could go back to 2016, remember when Hillary got all upset because the machines that she had hacked got unhacked, and then Jill Stein came in and demanded a recount because they couldn't figure out how those machines in Michigan and Wisconsin and such got unhacked or dehacked and Trump had won there? Remember that? Speaker 1: I do remember that quite well. And very good of you to know about that. I, I have not met anyone. I've mentioned that to a couple people. I've never met anyone who knew about that beforehand. That's just Speaker 0: what happened. About it since 2012 when I ran for president and saw what it takes to get on the ballot. Speaker 1: Well, it is the case that in 2016, I believe Hillary was expecting what was done for Joe Biden to be done for her. And so in that famous scene we've all read about where she's at her tower in New York, and she's been expecting to, be be have won that night, she lost her mind and was throwing plates and bottles and stuff at people? That wasn't just because she had lost And she had hoped all her life to be president, but she had lost. That was because she had been promised that the game would be rigged for her, And and it hadn't been. They had failed, and she was screaming basically because she was saying, you know, you guys promised you promised that you would take care of this, and it didn't happen. That's why she was so out of her mind because this was supposed to happen in 2016 When but somebody else got in the way. I'm not ready to reveal to the public how it happened, but in 2016, somebody counterhacked The people who were gonna hack on behalf of of, Hillary, that did not happen this time. But that's what really happened in 2016. But we'll Hang on. Stop there. Speaker 0: I knew that. I I figured that out right quick, and I think I figured out who did it too. And I wondered if, you know but that yeah. We'll save that for another. I I have good insight. Speaker 1: I know who did it, But we'll, we'll save that for another night. Speaker 0: Yeah. We'll save that for, we'll have a cocktail, and we'll make a

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

As soon as Trump got in office he established an election integrity commission. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/presidential-executive-order-establishment-presidential-advisory-commission-election-integrity/

Presidential Executive Order on the Establishment of Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity – The White HouseOpen MenuWhiteHouse.govCopy URL to your clipboardOpen SearchShare on FacebookShare on TwitterCopy URL to your clipboardWhiteHouse.govTwitterFacebookInstagramYouTube trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

In 2018 Byrne says there was a government group who reverse engineered the code. It’s not hard to do. It’s like math: A + B = C White hat’s capture the data. They have the Rolls & CVR, etc. They can figure out how the final product was produced. Take note of what Byrne says at the end… “The number of people who had to look the other way is unreal”

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2018, the Dallas elections had irregularities, similar to what we're hearing now. Texas hired a cybersecurity group to investigate these irregularities, finding 10 different ways the Dominion equipment could be manipulated. Texas outlawed the use of Dominion, but it was still used. This group spent 2 years reverse engineering how to rig an election using Dominion. Meanwhile, another cybersecurity group, including hackers and other experts, mapped out the election manipulation plan. They approached DHS and CISA for a meeting, but they refused to attend. It's concerning how many people turned a blind eye to this issue. Lawyers involved may not understand the technology, but they should be held accountable.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And your viewers should understand this, is that in 2018, the Dallas, Texas elections had irregularities in them Mhmm. Much like the irregularities we're now hearing about. This Texas state government hired a cybersecurity group to investigate these odd facts about the Dallas election that had been managed on Dominion equipment. That cybersecurity group went in and discovered about 10 different ways Mhmm. You know, the systems could be cheated. Mhmm. Ten different ways in which Dominion stuff is garbage. And in fact, Texas outlawed it in Texas as a result of that. Although I understand it was used anyway, but, Texas outlawed it, or made made a right against it. So that group was on it for 2 years and has had 2 years to to reverse engineer the the the way to rig an election using Dominion. Mhmm. The rest of America's had 2 weeks, 3 weeks to understand senate, they've had they had 2 years. I've been I've started get and they and another cybersecurity group. I started getting involved with N Funding back in the middle of the summer and kept this going and hired other hackers and hired other people that were needed. And we had the whole thing mapped out, just what they were gonna do, so much so that that's why we went to the DHS and the CISA and c ends they refused they they a a meeting was scheduled and a and a special room reserved for it, and the seasoned people whose job is to oversee this refused to attend the meeting. How odd. How criminal? How criminal? Well, all these people there's got all these yeah. Yeah. And, you know, it's not just if if you have a Microsoft lawyer over this kind of stuff, you get what you deserved because lawyers know you know, they don't know any of the actual technology. But, they're top sheeters. They're top leaders, they don't really understand it, but it's beyond below them, there's it's just filled with all kinds of of the number of people who had to look the other way for for this stuff to happen is unreal.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

This part of the interview Byrne let’s us know there is RICO. Likely by now, you have figured this out.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

There are certain things Twitter is not letting me post. 🤔 Highly likely “hidden” code to suppress info is still in effect. Data packets were confirmed to be captured the night of 2020 election. You’ll have to do some digging but you can find the affidavit from Col Waldron with pictures of China IP addresses.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

They have been reverse engineering & putting pieces together since at least 2018. “they” (various teams across in various capacities) have been investigating Since “activating” American citizens in 2020, the biggest crowd sourcing investigation has been going on to sus out who-what-where-when. There will be people who will wish they took offers to be whistleblowers. Byrne’s “plan” he is talking about was the FBI/CIA plan that they had him convinced & duped into participating with. He realized they were conducting a coup & stepped in to try & clean up the mess….thus, the article & all the revelations within.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

The evidence of foreign infiltration has been known

Video Transcript AI Summary
A Microsoft certified security expert provided evidence of a Dominion vote counting machine in a swing state with a wireless card connected to a thermostat's wireless network. The IP address traced back to a city in China, linked to a Chinese corporation involved in questionable dealings with American politicians. There is a thick binder of documented evidence showing foreign access and interference in the election, including public statements from the FBI and DHS warning about Iran's involvement. The evidence is undeniable, and those questioning it should argue with the FBI and DHS. The photographs and IPs provide conclusive proof of foreign interference in the voting systems.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 3 weeks ahead of what's in there. Here's one key thing. I'm not gonna tell you the state or much details about this, but I can tell you a Microsoft certified security guy has given us the photographs and the hard documentary or evidence of a Dominion vote counting machine, tabulation machine, in a swing state that had a has a I mean, we have the photographs, everything, has a wireless card inside it, and the forensics show that it connected to a a, a wireless in network in the thermostat. In the thermostat of the room, there there was a wireless network that connected into this machine, and when we trace back the IP, guess and then where it was, where from which it was accessed on election night and during the vote tabulation, over the next 24 hours, that was accessed through a, through a thermostat wireless into the wireless card on the the vote counting machine, and the IPs reveal, when you track them back and strip away the noise, was somebody in a city in China. And the city in fact, the actual address of that IP is connected to a is the the address of a corporation in China whose name has already come up in relation to some dirty dealings with some politicians of that state in America. So now and this is by no means we already have had I should be bringing this in the next room. I got a binder this thick of oh, I'm sorry. I'm Sydney. Anyway, I was gonna have this binder brought in. I've got a binder this thick of hard document documentary evidence foreign access and involvement on the this equipment. As a matter of fact, people are forgetting this. On November 3rd and on October 30th, the FBI, and I think it was CISA, DHS, put out a statement saying that Iran is illegally inter is has interjected itself into our election equipment. They were saying that 3 days before the election and on the day of the election, they put out special warning that Iran was electronically coming in and interfering our election. Everyone seems to forget that. You know, the proof what's proof one aspect of the proof is the FBI itself published this on November 3rd that it was happening that day or else one of them published it. So there is no question, but we have we have so many examples of this. Here's the binder we oh, thank you so much. Here's a binder we have. Well, this is, here's the Iranian advanced persistent threat. You should have your people your viewers Google this. Iranian advanced persistent threat actor identified. This is coming from, the Seiza group in the DHS, and it is dated October 30th. And there's more from the FBI on November 3rd itself. If I maybe screwing up a day or two, maybe the FBI was a couple days before. But the point is this whole binder is filled with both public documentation as well as private affidavits that document this up the wazoo, foreign this entire binder's only concerns foreign involvement in our computers, in our vote in our voting systems on during this election, this entire binder, and some of them are affidavits and some of them are government statements that were coming out on the day of the election that this is in fact happening. So there is no question when the mainstream media says, where's the evidence? You know, tell them to go argue with the FBI. Tell me to argue with the seat size of it because they're the ones who were saying it. But I'm telling you, we have this example I just gave you. I'm not telling you the state or any more details. We have the hard soup to nut documented photographs and IPs and everything. There was access from a Chinese company in, well, I won't tell you the city in China, from a company whose name is already, at the periphery of some of this mischief that they were accessing through the through the Internet, through a hidden port and a thermostat in the room getting on the Dominion machine and a that was you being used for vote counting in the middle of the vote counting in a swing state. So there's no question at this point. Anyone who's you know, it's silly. That that set of pictures and IPs itself documents everything we need to document.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

So many patriots showed up to the White House on January 6th, because they knew the 2020 election had been stolen by a foreign government or that at least knew in their gut something wasn’t right. Byrne describes it perfectly…

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions the credibility of Joe Biden's popularity by highlighting anecdotal evidence. They mention that Biden's campaign rally in Arizona had a low turnout, with only nine attendees, six of whom were his own campaign staff. They also point out that Biden's Thanksgiving address, which was treated as a formal event by the press, only had around 1,000 viewers on YouTube. The speaker finds it ironic that Biden, who supposedly received 74 million votes, struggles to attract a larger audience. They suggest that these inconsistencies raise doubts about the narrative that animosity towards Trump drove millions to vote for Biden.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. I I think that on Biden, you know, these are just anecdotes. I don't mean they're all these to be proof of my assertions, my allegations, but I I'm just trying to make people see the ridiculousness of some of this. Joe Joe, you know, Trump got a traffic jam 96 miles long supporting him in Arizona. Biden did his 1st campaign rally in Arizona, and I don't think 9 people showed up and 6 of them were his own campaign people. And just the other day on Thanksgiving, Biden did you know, clearly, they're trying to socially engineer and reinforce this reality that he won. And the just the other day at Thanksgiving, he did the presidential the president-elect, thanksgiving address as if it was some formal thing that had a history and the press, of course, place into it. But in that address, if you look watch it on YouTube, there were a 1,000 people watching live streaming. So somehow, the guy who beat Trump with 74,000,000 votes, the guy who beat him cannot draw 9 10 people to a rally in Arizona and can't get more than a 1000 people on live stream. I think my cute kitten can get a 1000 people watching them or her on livestream. So, that just tells you that that's the glitch in the matrix that can tell the alert public these things aren't adding up. There's a lot of other much more solid piece of evidence. But anecdotally, isn't it funny? I mean, if we're really to believe that, basically, the party line from the left is that the animosity towards Trump is so extreme that that's what drove 80,000,000 to go and vote for Biden. That's why people are so impassioned about Biden to get rid of Trump. Well, if that's true, why can't the guy draw more than a 1000 people on live stream on the as president-elect?

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

So, by now, everyone is wondering, with all this evidence that Byrne either has or knows about…did Trump know? Byrne confirms he told Trump in the infamous White House meeting with Flynn & Sydney Powell. And Byrne laid out the options given to Trump under the executive order. Read the account of the White House meeting carefully. Trump knew. Trump knew his options given to him by the executive order. So what did Trump do?….. next tweet I don’t want this tweet to get shared as a stand alone

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker mentions that they have informed someone about the idea of implementing the National Guard for a hand recount to meet the deadline. They state that the person has heard about it before and is being reminded again through an intermediary. The speaker believes that if the action is delayed until January 6th, it will have negative consequences. They mention that the idea has been presented to the person again, but not by them.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you think he's heard this? Has he do you think he's taking this into consideration to implement the National Guard on a hand recount for the you know, to get results in by Friday next week? Speaker 1: He heard it all from me, December 19th, and he heard it again tonight from an intermediary. He's hearing it now from somebody, from an intermediary. And, Let's so, so he I know he's been the idea has been revisited upon him tonight. But as I predicted to him, if you wait until January 6th to do this, it's gonna look really ugly. Just do it. So anyway, It's thrown out there, and I know I can't say he's considering, but it has been presented to him again tonight, not by me.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Read this account of the White House meeting. Byrne has confirmed Trump was made aware of the foreign interference. He was also given options. From totally seizing everything to the very lightest of touches. At this point Trump not only had the right but the DUTY to protect this country. The only question remains is…WHAT did Trump do?

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Take note of this snippet. Byrne is a master. He keeps his mouth shut. If you have ever watched him & noticed him self editing. People wrongfully think he has an impediment or stuttering problem. However, if you’ve watched the previous clips, he has zero problem when he is not searching his brain to determine if it’s information that either A) has become public yet or B) it is not time to reveal. In this clip, which is from 2020, you can see how he redirects Ann’s attention to another topic by dropping more info she hasn’t heard. Take note of the method he knows they use to steal the election.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses foreign interference in elections and questions why the president is not pursuing this avenue. They mention evidence of votes being sent overseas and foreign actors meddling in elections. The speaker then explains how voter rolls are kept in foreign nations, such as Pakistan, and how fake ballots are attributed to registered voters who have not yet voted. They reveal that 171,000 blank fake ballots were dropped into the system and attributed to different people, ultimately benefiting the Democratic candidates. The speaker concludes by stating that there are other aspects of foreign involvement in elections.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can I can I inter interrupt you here, Patrick, really quickly? Because, you know, one of the things that has been the harbinger for how and why we lost is all of the foreign interference in elections. Sydney Paul has talked about it. Your team has proven that the votes have gone overseas. We've had a lot of, you know, foreign actors coming in from China, Cuba, Venezuela, Italy now. I mean, we're we're learning that all of these other people have been middle meddling in our elections. Like. Why are we not when the president has all of this evidence, why are we not pursuing that avenue? I mean, it's very cut and dry. Computers don't lie. Ones and zeros are objective evidence here. We're not talking about, well, maybe they read the ballot wrong, maybe there was a hanging chad. This is pretty damning evidence. Why is the president not leveraging that? Is it because he doesn't have anybody to hand it off to, no DOJ, no law and order, no nobody? Speaker 1: Well, let me tell you. Last night, I watched packet traffic between Georgia and Islamabad. They were changing the balance last night live between Islamabad and and there were connections to Beijing. Aging and Islamabad were on the machines and well, what really happens, just so you know, I think you asked me on your show, how come people in Nevada when they register to vote, the information is sent to Pakistan. Do you remember asking me that? Or maybe it's a different show. I've done well, let me explain. I've been holding this like Close, but I'm done holding things close. I've got Flynn. I agree with me. It's time to let things out. I mean, what the hell are we waiting for? Here's how they do it. What are we waiting for? Yeah. Here's how they do a bunch of them. There's there's different buckets. There's different buckets of how they cheat. Here's a big one and it it's they keep voter rolls, our voter rolls, copies of them over in Pakistan and other foreign nations, and at the end of the day, like Happening last night in Georgia. They get to the end of the counting or near the end of the counting with just a few percent left, and they discover That their candidates are 150,000 short or 130,000 short. They drop in 170,000 Fake ballots last night, but you can't just enter a fake ballot. It's got to be attributed to get into the system. It has to be attributed to some voter in the voter Registration. So what this system does is it goes live, and it checks in Islamabad Where is, get of a a registered voter who's not yet voted? And, okay, we'll we'll like. Check it off to him, okay, the next one will check off to the next one. And so that's why they use them up and that's why you also get these weird results of people saying, I didn't, I checked, I didn't vote, but it shows that I voted, that's why it was happening. And that's why these things have to have a live connection. They have a live connection back to Islamabad or back to were back, and that real time checking is done. So at the end of the day, what they did last night, they dropped a 171,000 like. Blank fake blank ballots into the system. They to get them through the system, they had to say, well, who were these 170,000 voters? Like. It attributed them, it went in Czech Live and Islamabad and attributed to a bunch of different people who had not voted, and then they all just get adjudicated and dropped To the 2 democratic candidates. That's how it works, folks. I'm now revealing it because what the hell is the point of keeping it secret? That's the big four now there are other aspects of foreign. So there's absolute foreign involved into this.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Think back… What did the huge Russia Hoax lie do? It was SO successful that it hamstrung Trump. He knew if he seized all the machines it would have triggered civil war. Half the country completely believed Trump was Hitler incarnate. A heavy hand would have confirmed that. The deepstate would have successfully made people believe he was lying & he was controlling the military & everyone to just say the election was stolen

Video Transcript AI Summary
DNI John Radcliffe needs to step forward to make anyone believe what it would take. Although he seems intelligent, he may not be the best fit for the job. He has been deceived by those around him. It would be helpful if he could come out and discuss this matter. A meeting with him and a few others could potentially convince him or show evidence of foreign involvement.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What it would take no one's gonna believe him at this point. What it would take is DNI John Radcliffe coming forward. Now, John, if you think Donald Trump has been up to his chest and snakes, DNI Radcliffe has who I've met a couple times, three times, and he seems like a very fine and smart man. He seems like a very intelligent guy. He's Not sure he's the guy I'd send to go bite the ass off a bear and that's what that job really took. And he's a careful federal prosecutor type guy and he's been totally buffled and snowed in by the people around him. So it would really take he should come out. I could sit with him in for 90 minutes tomorrow and bring a couple people, and if if he's not convinced to foreign or we can we can show all this.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

S what has been the “plan” that Trump chose? We haven’t seen everything unfold yet. But…we know part of that plan was to get senators to do the right thing & send the electors back down to the state to investigate.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Patrick discusses the discovery of fraudulent ballots in Georgia. After sending someone to investigate a voting operation in Fulton County, they found that one of the three piles of ballots was illegitimate. The Georgia Senate Judiciary Committee inspected the ballots but they were later loaded onto a rental van and disappeared. The next day, a shredding operation in a neighboring county shredded some of the ballots, but law enforcement intervened and found shredded ballots and a receipt from a Chinese company. Patrick believes this is a national security issue and calls for action. He expresses confidence that Americans will not accept a rigged election and emphasizes the importance of maintaining peace while standing against it.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So, Patrick, I I followed you on Twitter. I saw that you post something, in Georgia, and, the the ballots were being shredded. And then there's, like, a receipt found from Chinese print shop. Tell us a bit more. Speaker 1: That's correct. We located some, Operation in Georgia in Fulton County, Georgia, Atlanta, where we thought there were some we sent somebody into the voting operation And the warehouse took samples of from 3 different piles, big, big piles. We had those tested forensically by two Federally certified forensic examiners, they have confirmed, as they said on Sesame Street, one of these things is not like the other. One of those ballots is not legitimate. The other 2 were. On last Wednesday, the sent the Georgia Senate Judiciary Committee When he voted to go inspect those ballots in those warehouse, we got movies. 4 hours later, an enterprise rental man backed up to the warehouse, Loaded it all up and disappeared. We know that the next day, a shredding operation in the next neighboring county called Cobb County Was somebody brought them a bunch of ballots to shred, which you shouldn't be doing, and they shredded them, But the law enforcement got involved. We had everything under and law enforcement got involved, And it all ended up dumped out on the floor of a police station, and they have found £3,000 of Shredded ballots, but here's the great part. The machine, you do something like that and by the way, they're shredding. They didn't just do the strip shredding. They didn't do the confetti. They did the special military shredding, which creates little tiny spitballs. So they really wanted to get rid of it, but some things Ducked to the side of the van, some complete ballots, and a receipt from a Chinese company that shipped The ballots to the United States. So they were counterfeiting ballots in China again to be used in Georgia and I believe other other States as well. Speaker 0: You know, we're not surprised by it because I remember attorney Cindy Powell said earlier that, there were ballots printed in China, and they were still being shipped to United States either across the Mexican border or on plan. So what do we do about it? What's next? Speaker 1: Well, we found them. We found them. It's true. 1st step is we gotta get through this phony election. 2nd step, which could be over tomorrow If they if the people in the senate read the constitution and understand their duty, at no point do you have a duty? This is a national security issue. At no point does Does any senator have a duty to to sell the country out to China? So that's the first step. And the next step is we have to We we have to talk to China. I do not wanna go to war with China. I wanna be a peacemaker, but this was an act of war. This was an act of war, and we have to revisit The whole relationship were designed if there's gonna be 1 at all. Speaker 0: Do you have high expectation of what's going to happen tomorrow. Speaker 1: I have high expectations in one sense for yeah. You know, I can't tell you what Michael Pence is gonna do, But I can tell you what we're gonna do. There's, you know, we there's this phrase American exceptionalism, and there's a question of whether what that means. Well, I think we're finding out because this kind of coup has worked in Venezuela. It's worked all over Latin America. It's worked in Greece. It's worked in lots of countries. It's not gonna work here because Americans are not going to bend a knee to a rigged election. I see why other Nations have fallen for it. They've created this kooky, insane world where you can't even find your way out of it. But at no, And I understand why other nations at the end of the day gave up, but Americans will never accept a rigged election. If we do, It's the most fundamental concept of our tradition is consent of the governed as determined by elections That are free, fair, and transparent. If we give ground on that principle, it's all gone. So under no circumstance Can we bend the knee to this? Now I wanna be clear. I'm not advocating violence. We're the good guys. We're gonna do everything peaceably. It's the goons who bring violence. We're we wanna maintain that moral high ground so we we don't engage in violence, but we're not gonna bend a knee.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Byrne has said that senators were informed prior to J6. Read this article. It’s a hit piece, but in 5G information warfare, there is truth & lies mixed together. Note that Col Waldron put together a power point that was distributed to the senators. https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2021/12/11/2068815/-Retired-Army-Colonel-and-informational-warfare-specialist-lets-slip-that-he-sent-the-Powerpoint They were informed, they knew. If you remember there were 100+ senators ready to vote against certification. The “insurrection” happens & they all vote to confirm Biden the “winner”. The details of everything that happened on J6 is still yet fully known. It LOOKS like, at this point, we have a bunch of traitors to our country. I say…things still need to play out. I can not believe Trump walked away without a contingency plan. I can’t believe ALL those senators betrayed our country.

Retired Army Colonel and "informational warfare" specialist lets slip that he sent the Powerpoint — Hot off the presses, as some say ... Phil Waldron, a retired Army colonel and an influential voice in the movement to challenge the election, said on Friday from a bar he owns outside Austin, Texas, that he had circulated the document — titled... dailykos.com

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Oh…I forgot to post a link in the previous tweet that went along with Col Waldron’s PowerPoint item about Dominion getting $400M from China. There’s some more tidbits in this article about Dominion. Look this article up. Twitter won’t let me post it Plus they got a bunch in “settlements”. We are all fully aware of how the launder money. Did Fox get money from China? 🤔

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

There is a theory that Trump put the protection of the fundamental core of our government in the hands of the military. Which…seems to make sense. I KNOW Trump loves our country & would not abandon Her or all of us. In war, things are ugly & tough decisions are made. We haven’t seen everything play out yet. I believe there are moves & counter moves happening. Such as this tidbit…the Brunson brother’s case. Based on “National Emergency” that bypassed all lower courts & went straight to SCOTUS. Someone at SCOTUS helped them frame. We don’t know yet if something will actually come of it, or if it was used to put people in a kind of choke hold. Note in this clip that Byrne explained it puts everyone in Congress on notice….”do something dumb & you’re all gone right now”. And, notice his elation in the news….he knows our country is protected from huge fundamental changes as the rest of the war plays out.

Video Transcript AI Summary
This video discusses the Bronson case, which has made it to the Supreme Court. The case argues that there was a legal obligation to investigate the 2020 election under the Electoral Reform Act. The Supreme Court reached out to the Bronson brothers and asked them to rewrite their case as a national emergency. The government appointed a US attorney to represent the 388 members of Congress who voted to accept the electoral votes without investigating. The Supreme Court now has the power to dismiss these individuals from office, including President Biden and Vice President Harris, if they engage in any questionable actions. The video suggests that the Supreme Court has a loaded gun and can take action if necessary.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, boobies. Patrick here. Talk to you about this Bronson case. What a case. What a sleeper. What a, a, unforeseen bumper shot. Okay. The Brunson's are these brothers out of Ogden, Utah. Go Utah. And this case is quite interesting. The theory, it's made it to the Supreme Court under very unusual circumstances that you really need to understand. This is a sleeper. There's stuff going on behind the scenes. Okay. The theory of this case is It doesn't get into asking the courts to decide whether the election was of 2020 was defective or it points out that it was procedurally defective and how the electoral votes were counted in the following way. When those Challenges were made. There was a legal obligation created by the 18/71 Electoral Reform Act or 18/77 something rather. But there was a legal obligation to investigate for 10 days between it and something Ted Cruz did and what he had followed. And the objection, there was a legal obligation. By all these people in congress to investigate that we might be under foreign attack and blah, blah, blah. They failed to do so. Doing so was itself Whether or not the underlying case without even having to opine on that, the Supreme Court would not need to opine that that fundamental underlying case was correct to say you had an obligation and you failed in your constitutional duty to investigate which is the demand of the law. So on that basis, Well, different versions the brothers filed different versions of this in at least 2 different federal districts and that's not a tactic unknown to the America project. On Tuesday, you're gonna be hearing about the same kind of thing from us but maybe involving a different issue, but there's a they filed in different places and through some combination of well, they filed that argument and it's been in this circuit, the 10th circuit and I what was that? The 4th, I forget. But the thing is, Now, they've been public about this. I've heard this back channel. The supreme court reached out to them in the middle of October and said, how quickly can you get this filed out with us or how can you can you quickly get something done and filed with us? And they said, well, we're stuck in the 10th circuit. The Supreme Court said, well, under rule 11, you can skip and go right to the Supreme Court if it's a national emergency. Why don't you rewrite this as a national emergency? And the guys the Supreme Court clerk called down and told them that presumably someone who was whispering in his ear. So they re and the guy asked can I have weeks and they said, no? Get it done in a week. So they got it done in a week and filed it back in. The Supreme Court took it, like, October 20th, 23rd, 23rd. They asked for the government to respond. The government had until Wednesday, November 23rd, 25th. Just the Wednesday before Thanksgiving, just 5 days ago, 4 days ago. And 5 days ago. And the government, somewhere along the way, they had appointed and everyone named in the case of the 388 members of congress who voted to accept the electoral votes without investigating which was their constitutional duty. Notwithstanding any argument about what the underlying assertion was, the fact that there was objections and those objections were ignored is in fact, Per this argument, a violation of their constitutional oath. So it's against 388 members of Congress, as well as Biden and Harris. The The Supreme Court said calls up October 20th and says, get us that case and the people of their own pro se, but they've got some Usd usual people in the background helping them. They all write they they got it in a week later on this new ground. Oh, And then, understand it's a national security emergency. The 10th circuit found out what they were doing. The 10th circuit, which have been sitting on it for months found out when they were doing it, they quickly issued something, a decision against them. So which meant it just kinda changed what they, how they oh, just got a message about this. It just means they changed the NASA's. They didn't have to use that national security. They recast it without the national security, got it in and now it gets especially weird. The Government had appointed a US attorney to represent all 388 people. That person backed out or that person dropped it from the DOJ. That the DOJ dropped it. At which point the solicitor general stepped up and said, I will be defending this. And he did not object on Wednesday. When Wednesday came, they did not file for an extension. They did not file for this or for that. They just didn't file an answer, which means supreme court can now meet on this and anytime they want, they don't even have to have a public hearing. They don't even have to have a public hearing. They could because the other side is unopposed and on the facts and law, they can actually just look at everything and Now why is this so important? There is some scuttlebutt that the last desperate act of the coup is planned Has been planned right now, it's for this lame duck session of congress. All kinds of funny things happen during lame duck sessions of congress. For example, the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve, as my friend Juan Savin Points out was affected in the lame duck session of congress is when they passed it in 2013. The income tax, they restructured America as they knew when they were on the way out before the guys would come in and there were no costs, political cost to be paid. They did these crazy radical stuff that changed America. Yeah. There has been suspicion that they that Biden and a compliant enough democratic house and senate Would right now go along with something whack job like they're gonna expand the Supreme Court and stack it or they're going to who knows what they might be planning on doing right in this lame duck session of congress. Well, This basically gives this case, now the Supreme Court has reached in, taken it, blown it up, Dressed it up, said rewrite it this way. Okay. You don't need that anymore. Okay. Good. We got it. Thanks. We got it from here. They have it and the solicitor general of the United States didn't even Pose that the Supreme Court of the United States is now in the position to do anything they want with that case. They have a loaded gun with a hammer cock being held to the head of congress. If congress gets together and tries any happy horseshit, like I was just saying, like stacking the supreme court are doing some crazy thing on the way out. If they did that in in an hour, the supreme court can pull the pull Pull the trigger and this and now what is the remedy sought? The remedy sought is to dismiss all 388 people from office, Just to dismiss them from office. Just to dismiss them from office, like the park police, the Capitol police being informed and giving orders to escort these 388 people off the grounds. If that hat off the grounds of the capital, everyone who voted to accept electoral votes count them without investigating. It would also give the power to the Supreme Court. Pardon me. Perhaps same thing to happen to 1 president Joseph Biden and Kamala Harris b p Kamala Harris, they would just be escorted off per per such a decision. The way this is structured, The Supreme Court wouldn't have to find that the 2020 election was fraudulent. It just would have to say, there were valid objections made. These people had a constitutional duty to investigate, they failed to, their subsequent acts are nullified and the man who was president and never Seated. Never conceded and did a formal handover. He has then just technically remained the president all this time Is what that decision is asking is actually the remedy that's being sought. It puts the power the Supreme Supreme court is now 1 hour away. Anytime they want, they can pull the trigger on that and make that happen. They have that bullet locked and loaded it in the chamber if any monkey business starts going on between now and January 3rd. Do you think these Nancy Pelosi types are gonna go out without trying to do something crazy? Is now they can pull the trigger and it isn't like they're overturning the election in 2020. They're just saying that election nullified and the underlying guy who never surrendered, never conceded, never surrendered. He actually has just remained president all this time. The secret service To escort the other guys out of the White House, Donald Trump will be present. Now is that far fetched? Of a lot less far fetched than it was a month ago. The supreme court reached in and helped create that set of circumstances. The supreme court Has has now gotten a loaded gun that is holding in the hand in in at the head of this administration. It can pull the trigger any time they won. And behind the scenes, I've been hearing scuttlebutt about crazy machinations and things the democrats thought they might pull off in the last few weeks. They now have a gun held to their head. If they do something like that, this whole government gets dismissed by the supreme court. Right on.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

We are in a whole new kind of war. There will a lot of “what about this…what about that…”🤷‍♀️. But I do know in war there are tough decisions to make. Byrne has repeatedly asked for peace. He has warned against China wanting our country. The discomfort we have been experiencing is way better than 90% of us starving to death & being rape/pillaged/killed to ultimately hand over our land to China. The article he refers to in this interview 👇🏻 https://jrnyquist.blog/2019/09/11/the-secret-speech-of-general-chi-haotian/

Video Transcript AI Summary
Reality is chaotic and difficult to understand for those who haven't experienced it. There are concerns about the fragility of America's supply chains, particularly in terms of food, fuel, and pharmaceuticals. Cities only have about three days' worth of food, and after two weeks, the situation becomes irreversible. The interruption of fuel supply leads to a halt in food distribution. Additionally, there is a 30-day supply of pharmaceuticals, and many people rely on them for survival. If a civil war were to occur, it is predicted that 90% of the population would die within a year due to supply chain collapse. This is seen as part of a Chinese plan to colonize and occupy the US. A speech by the Chinese Minister of Defense in 2003 supports this theory.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Reality. I remember explosions, random explosions, like, 2 blocks down. I mean, it's, aerial bombings. You know? This is I I I don't think any I don't think people that have not lived through that understand what that means, and it is chaotic generations. Speaker 1: Yeah. And I didn't even go further. There's that issue, and then there's another issue, which is it was modeled out 20 years ago in America. What happens if there's a financial collapse or an EMP or whatever? And in all cases, we try to be much more fragile than we intuitively understand. America is alive because of All these dozens of invisible supply chains and 3 key ones being food, fuel, and pharmaceuticals. Mhmm. Food and cities, there's only 3 days of food in the cities. There's 9 meals and then your kids are starving. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: That will get violent after 3 days, and after 2 weeks, it will be through a tipping point that it cannot come back. Fuel fuel once the fuel stops flowing, then the diesel truck stops flowing. Once they stop flowing, food stops flowing, Fuel more fuel stops flowing. Again, the system unspools. And plus third, pharmaceuticals. There's 30 days of pharmaceuticals in the supply chain. 50% of men 50% of people over 50 are walking around with conditions that without the right pharmaceuticals, you're dead in 6 months. Mhmm. So and that includes every diabetic. So every diabetic starts dying in 30 days. So if we go to civil war, it's been modeled, and unfortunately, 90% of us die From this over 1 year 1 year, 90% died from the supply chain collapse. So I think that's the Chinese plan. They want that to happen. We collapse. As we collapse, then the cartels get 3 years to rate, pillage, loot, and burn, and we are a husk That the Chinese colonized and occupied by 2028. And if you if this sounds extreme, I'm gonna give you a link to the speech by the minister of defense China, the highest level leak in Chinese history, which explained in 2003 how the day is gonna come when they hit the US with a bioweapon. Cartels rape pillage loot and burn, occupy us, and thereby solve the problem that for 25 100 years, bedoubled the Han race, which is lack of Arab a land. So it's in their own speech. It's not me. It's in their own material.
The Secret Speech of General Chi Haotian In 2005, The Epoch Times acquired a secret speech given by Defense Minister Chi Haotian to high-level Communist Party Cadres sometime before his retirement in 2003. Details given in Chi’s speech coincide with previously unpublished defector testimony on Sino-Russian military plans. The speech follows: Comrades, I’m very excited today, because the large-scale online survey sina.com… jrnyquist.blog

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Part of this war is opening our eyes to all that has been hidden. Think of everything we have learned about our government, not only the dirty deeds, but also we’ve learned (or relearned) the functions of government. And look who has revealed themselves, as traitors, cowards or just plain egomaniacs. (Even some good guys have proven they have allowed their desire to “be a hero” to override what’s good for the “fight”.) I would argue, we have learned stuff about ourselves. If Trump had taken a heavy hand, we would never have learned all we did. And on a grand scale- we wouldn’t have seen the China infiltration. There is still more that will come. Will you be ready to accept it & help others to learn the truth? And as this war plays out, the deepstate will try to fear us into bending a knee. Will you help your family & friends stay calm & help them stand even in the face of fear?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss their concerns about various issues, including the border invasion, changes in culture, and the COVID narrative. Despite these concerns, Speaker 1 expresses optimism about the future, believing that the truth will be revealed and that society is moving away from certain behaviors. Speaker 0 acknowledges that there are still some people who continue to wear masks, but overall, they see a shift in society's mindset. Speaker 1 explains that fear plays a role in people's behavior, as it causes them to think from their amygdala instead of their frontal lobe, making them less receptive to logic. The speakers also mention their struggles in trying to reason with others who are thinking from a place of fear.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wow. Wow. So, Patrick, when we're before the interview, you had actually regardless of all the horrible things happening and, you know, let me take a sec to list them out here. You know, we've been covering the border invasion. We've been covering the we call it invasion of all kinds. Right? Border invasion, invasion of our schools, invasion of our judicial system, Invasion of our of our legislature, pretty much invasion across the board, medical industrial complex, you know, military industrial complex, everything seems to have been invaded in some form or another, in terms of these massive changes that we're trying to see pushed through in our culture. Right? Sec. You you said though that you are positive about you have positive feelings about what the future might hold. Let's talk about that for a sec. Speaker 1: Quite positive because, you know, the the cover up is over. There are people living under Iraq who are still buying into the program, but it's the first step. Well, you know, they were the apocalypse. Sec. Apocalypse really doesn't mean, you know, a big napalm strike. Apocalypse means uncovering. Mhmm. The cover, like the eclipse. So it's an uncovering and the apocalypse that may be upon us, sec. Well, that is upon us. Maybe a great uncovering of a great deal of truth and a great deal of facts. Sec. And that it just may take the truth. And it can't make people knowing the truth about things. And If that's where we are, we can get out of this without a war, we can get out of this with a civil war, without anyone dying. I'm a big proponent of what's called truth and reconciliation. I don't I know I don't have many fans on my side, on our side of the table on on this one. But once in a while Well, before before anyway, it's about so I think that we're very close to the truth coming out about everything. In fact, the truth already has, Who do you meet that buys into the COVID narrative anymore? Mhmm. Everybody you know, once in a while, I'm planning to see a few idiots sitting there with their shields on, but it's almost sec. 98%. It seems no one buys into that. That being all kinds of things. BLM is bankrupt. BLM has turned out to be. So so many of these things have, you know, I I saw there's a good clip on Twitter. They have a woman in Oakland, old lefty Oakland, And she's a woman standing up, screaming at the town council about the violence and saying, basically, we've had enough your with your ideology. We gotta have sec Everyone's getting assaulted. There's got to be long order. So just that we're at the point of the veil is lifting, that's step 1, that gives me great hope. And the veil, Don't you feel the veil lifting across society? Speaker 0: I do. I do. But there is always, like, I don't know. There's still that 10% just walking around with mask on, I think, oh my god, are you are you guys completely out of your minds? In fact, it reminds me of I think it was Joe Gilbert on the show said that, the ancient Greeks proved that masks don't work, so it's been a good 25 100 years. So you wonder why some of these people are still doing that. I mean, the brainwashing doesn't seem to have left sec some, but, yes, I do see 90% of society, at least, you know, moving away from that sort of behavior. Speaker 1: You know why? It's when they it's part of the SIOP that they so frighten everybody. Mhmm. People are frightened. They stop making from their frontal lobe, And they start which is, you know, which is basically the the motherboard, the the thing that's special. They start thinking from the amygdala. The part of the brain that controls fight or flight. It's why crucial part of the SIOP has been about frightening people as much as they can. When you're thick from your amygdala, you take, you become impervious to logic, And you folk look for herd, you become a herd animal, and you just look at what the herd's doing and you do that. So trying to reason with someone who's thinking from their amygdala Is like trying to reason with a drowning man. You can't do it. I'm sure you've had your experiences in the last few years that I'm talking to Relatives about like, here's the data on COVID, on mass, on vaccines, here's the data on Ivermectin, Doesn't matter what the show, they just can't process. That's because they're from a low to shut down. They're thinking of the remainder line.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

As far as what happens next… We “fight” with all we have. Elections are States’ responsibilities. And States are citizens’ responsibilities. We allowed this mess by being “fat & sassy”. Now we have to get ourselves out of it. We are not without hope. The larger picture is going to play out. We do not have all the information at is playing out behind the scenes. However, we can make a difference in our own state/county/precinct. Let’s practice a modified serenity prayer. God, please grant me serenity with things I can not change, the fortitude to help change the things I can & the wisdom to know the difference. No matter what state you are in, encourage everyone you know to get involved: Become PCs, Volunteer at great organizations making a difference, Volunteer to be the eyes & hands in the elections, and encourage people to run for office & to vote. It’s going to take all of us to get through this. Many hands make light work. I have things I will be doing, I hope you will too. Part of my plan? Get Byrne’s article & the truth about the voting machines in the hands of every one I talk to. How? The same way I did COVID, masks, & the audit…create items to handout (pamphlets, buttons, stickers, shirts), emails & phone calls. The key is: Do what you can to help, never give up, stay peaceful & we will come out the other side together.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the concept of truth and reconciliation and suggests that everyone should remain calm until the 2024 election. They mention concerns about Trump winning and the potential for violence. They emphasize the importance of working on election integrity, such as cleaning voter rolls and taking action on election day. The speaker expresses fear that there may be attempts to provoke a civil war or impose martial law. They believe that reasonable behavior can prevent extreme measures, but warn against doubling down on divisive actions like another COVID-19 situation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Earlier, we were talking when we were talking about truth and reconciliation, it sounded like you were saying that election 2024 is gonna come. We should all be cool until then. Let's you know, no violence. Nothing. Let's just let the election happen. And then after that, the truth and reconciliation comes. I guess, what I deciphered from that is that, you think that Trump's going to win, hence, and therefore, there's gonna be a chance for so you shouldn't. Speaker 1: Well, I wouldn't say that we sit back into the election. We have to work like madmen to get We have to work like mad men to get, on election integrity, and you can do stuff anywhere you are watching this. You can work on your voter rolls. What we've learned is for them to stuff the ballot box. They first stuff the voter rolls. So every calendar efforts to clean voter rolls, They just they're discovering hundreds of thousands, millions of votes in New York from 2020. I mean, they're just realizing that our voter rolls on that country are just Filled with slot. So that's one thing to get involved with and also election integrity action efforts on election day. So that's one thing. I have red lines where I say, so I'm all about peace. I'm afraid that they're going to try some kooky stuff. What What they're going to try to do is get it either there'll be a nuclear, a limited nuclear exchange, or they'll get a civil war going. They'll So they'll say white nationalists have started this and that. We need to have a police state. Are they gonna say get a civil war going from among the Our new guests in the country, they'll get a civil war going. But somewhere is another it needs the federal government to do a martial law. I want you to know we can't have an election. I'm afraid they're going down that path, and that's not that's, that would be disheartening if they go down that path. That's not gonna work I need them I wish I think that they were afraid, and I know that they're afraid because they talked to journalists and journalists asked me questions. And so I know what they're thinking. And what they're thinking is we're gonna hang 1500 of them. We're not gonna hang 1500 of them, especially if everyone starts being reasonable. And we but If they keep doubling down and doubling down, if they try to do another, you know, COVID nineteen thing. Anyway, so what do you think

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

A lot of you are saying “yeah, but…” I get it. There are many “battles” going on. We are a swarm of killer bees trying to puncture what seems like impenetrable skin. We WILL break through..we have already made progress. Remember, the act of covering up, tampering with evidence & refusing information IS evidence. Maricopa county had 6 months to tamper with those boxes. I saw the fake ballots first hand. I saw the patterns they used to stuff Biden & Trump ballots. Yes, Trump ballots. They had to get Trump votes in those boxes of fake Biden ballots. Nothing anyone says will change that fact. Now we let all the legal stuff play out. Remember-no court has heard the evidence. Even Lake’s case, the judge limited what could be presented, limited the time frame to do it & set unprecedented standards. There are MANY cases that never got the evidence heard. And not ONE public court has heard the evidence of the foreign interference…yet. Lake’s case is a slam dunk. It will go to SCOTUS. And if you’ve been paying attention, SCOTUS has been issuing fair judgements. Didn’t they just affirm that it’s not a RIGHT to have the world bend to “your” will? I don’t think they will fail us. And I am confident that there are contingencies upon contingencies upon contingencies in this war. Be fluid. Roll with the punches. Stay focused on our task. And pray. #PowerOfPrayer I’ll end this for now. I’m sure there will be more to this story.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Found a shareable link to the affidavit that shows IP addresses & foreign interference https://www.scribd.com/document/485933370/gov-uscourts-mied-350905-1-15#from_embed Wasn’t there a debate on if scorecard (vote flipping software) was in use? Bunch of nuggets in this document.

Declaration of XXXXXXXXX.: (Redacted) Location in The United States of America | PDF | Digital Forensics | Computer Security gov.uscourts.mied.350905.1.15 - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. Exhibit 7 scribd.com

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

I’ve got more to add to the thread. I had forgotten I did a thread on the speech about China mentioned above. It’s worth the time to check it out. I have some more Byrne clips in there. With Byrne it’s all about putting pieces together.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Adding Loy Brunson’s interview. As I’ve shown you, above, Congress were made aware of foreign interference. They had a DUTY to uphold their oath to investigate the claim. This lawsuit will be historical. But, as Loy stated-SCOTUS needs to know they have our support. There have been ~80k letters sent. I hope it becomes at least 80M!

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Byrne did a Live Locals. A few significant updates 1) he’s in France/Italy & has been gathering evidence that “should” impeach Biden

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm not on vacation in Europe, even though it may seem that way. I'm actually here working for you all. I have obtained something on this trip that, in the past, could have led to the president's impeachment if posted online. I have evidence that makes it very easy to impeach Joe Biden for criminal activity.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But I'm not over here in Europe vacationing, though, though it may look it. I'm not over here vacationing. I am doing work for you folks. I'll tell you because I already have it back in America that I obtained something on this trip that at any previous age, in any previous age, I would you could post online, and and the president would be impeached the next week. I got stuff that it makes it absolutely easy to impeach Joe Biden and criminal activity on me hard and I got it.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

2) Byrne gives an update on Michigan “we have them dead to rights”. Reminds when he said “I caught you all mother F’ers” at the ReAwaking tour. As we see from his article - he’s not hyperbolic.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In Michigan, after the 2020 election, the secretary of state, Jocelyn Benson, issued an order for the submission of election materials. Many people disobeyed this order and turned in the materials to their local sheriffs, who then initiated a law enforcement investigation. Sheriffs are the primary law enforcement officers responsible for investigating election fraud. Some town and county clerks also turned in the materials and hired attorney Stephanie Lambert, along with experts Ben Cotton, Eric Spakim, and Jim Penrose, to examine them. These experts found evidence of wrongdoing.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. In Michigan, the day after the election no. 2020 or couple weeks after, the Soros goon, who's the secretary of state, Jocelyn Benson, sent instructions to everybody involved in elections into a race, their thumb thumb drives, e poll books, all that stuff. Totally lawless order. A whole bunch of people disobeyed, went to their local sheriffs, turn it in, those sheriffs started a law enforcement investigation. Per the federal law, the state law, and the common law, sheriffs are the primary law enforcement officers don't have anything to do with election fraud. They're the 1st to investigate. Well, and these local officials turned their materials in. A couple town clerks or county clerks, rec record county recorders did the same thing. Those people hired a Michigan attorney who's a 12 year Detroit named Stephanie Lambert. Stephanie, hired lots of really qualified experts, Ben Cotton, Eric Spakim, Jim Penrose, they tore through this stuff, and they found everything. We have every these guys have everything.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

3) I find it interesting that Byrne’s “end of summer” to find out why he hasn’t been doing live locals lately, Loy Brunson’s “have through summer” to get letters to SCOTUS, & the hint about SCOTUS that Rachel made & Byrne confirmed he heard the same thing. Could it be a release of more pieces of the puzzle? Could it be a convergence of paths? 🤔

Video Transcript AI Summary
I have been doing this less frequently, but you will understand why soon. Anyway, I hope to settle the beef before the summer is over.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You folks will understand sometime soon why I've been somewhat I've been doing this less frequently, but you'll understand sometime soon. But anyway, beef before the summer's over kind of thing, I I hope

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

I know that we are exhausting the remedies at the lower courts - necessary to get to SCOTUS (it also ferrets out the crooked judges) In Byrne’s update he explains the evidence led right back to the crooked SOS & AG & they tried to go after those bringing the cases to court.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the legality of town clerks investigating elections in Michigan and hiring outside parties for investigations. They mention reports from experts that confirm their claims. They accuse the secretary of state and attorney general of Michigan of trying to shut down the investigation and implicate themselves. The speaker explains how Stephanie, funded by the America Project, fought in court to keep the attorney general from taking over the case. They criticize the attorney general for wanting to bring charges against those involved in examining election machines and thumb drives, despite previously instructing to erase the data. The speaker defends the use of expert witnesses and mentions their role as a consultant to the project.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And, actually, I mean, I was engaged so the sheriff's engaged Stephanie. All this is perfectly legal. Town clerks have it right there in the red in the black letter law of Michigan. Town clerks have the right to investigate elections in their county if they think something They think there was some mischief. And because they may suspect their own people are corrupt, they have the right to go to an outside party to run the investigation. They did that. They hired Stephanie, and the sheriffs hired Stephanie. So that's totally legal. Well, what do you know? All that material, everything that we Guest in November. It's all true. I've put up here and there some of the reports that have come out of it, the expert reports from It's the Keene from from, Ben Cotton. There's no question. We have him dead to rights. Well, what happened was the Soros goon posing as a secretary of state and the Soros goon posing as an attorney general of Michigan In desperation, all the evidence led right to them. They went after, believe it or not, honest to god, they went after the sheriffs And the town clerk and Stephanie and the expert witnesses, the trail of evidence led to the dirty secretary of state and the dirty attorney general, but those people acted and tried to get the shutdown. 1st, they tried to get it shut down by saying, we are gonna take this investigation over. And Stephanie had to go to work on behalf of the sheriffs. And by the way, you, the America Project, me, we're funding all this. She went or, I mean, a bunch of it. The sheriffs have limited budget. So Stephanie had to fight in court to keep the attorney general from reaching down and taking the case in which the attorney general was implicated, you know, this closed circle of corruption. So then the attorney general Tried to get the office of the attorney general to bring charges against any of these people because they opened an election machine or this to that, and they looked at a thumb drive. And this is all so sacred, and our law says no one can touch this stuff, forgetting that in November 2020, she told everyone to erase it all, but suddenly it's so sacred no one else can touch it. Well, these are all court certified Cyber forensic people and everything. Everyone who's touched it. There's no problem. And lawyers have been using expert witnesses forever, and It sort of upends the whole legal system if suddenly sheriffs can't hire lawyers and lawyers can't hire expert witnesses. Incidentally, I am officially a consultant to that project, which means that sometimes as I do research, I'm actually operating under As a as a consultant to a woman who has a legal contract with some

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Crooked judges will back down when push comes to shove. I wouldn’t put it past a grievance being filed against Judge Thompson. It’s about time we started applying lawfare.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A judge sanctioned and fined someone, but the appellate court overturned it. The person also filed a grievance against the judge and scheduled a deposition with the secretary of state. However, the case was dismissed by the judge who was being investigated, which canceled the deposition.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: She did 2 things. She made a a judicial referral. Oh, she got sanctioned. She got sanctioned and fined, she appealed it up, the appellate court threw out the fine, threw out the sanction, all that happy horse shit. It's just some crooked judges lower down forget it. But in addition, she went for sanctions against the judge. It turns out there this is what we need to do more of. Turns out the judges have their own sort of special judicial in states that are I forget what it's called, but like a you can go and file a grievance against the judge. Stephanie did that against this judge. I think it's a female judge. And Stephanie filed a grievance against them and noticed the Soros goon, Jocelyn Benson, to be deposed on August 4th. And I posted that the other day on Twitter that She got the authority to interview the secretary of state of Michigan under her state, which would have blown everything under the out of the water because that secretary of state's got to sit there and either lie like hell under oath or is gonna have to reveal the whole scheme. The case just went away yesterday. The case just went away. The judge has dismissed the case. The judge who Stephanie went after for sanctions for being so egregiously outside the law and law fair, just using the law to punish. Stephanie was absolutely in her right to take that case. The clerks absolutely were in their right to It's black and white law in Michigan. The town clerk, after an election, the town can conduct his or her own investigation using county resources or hire private resources to do it right there in the law. So this this case had no business going anywhere to begin with. Well, the judge who herself now has a grievance against her just yesterday unplugged the whole case, which, of course, unplugs the August 4th deposition of the secretary of state.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

And what about the USPS case? The USPS is not going to turn over who paid for that truck even if a federal judge orders them to. Could it be Runbeck? Could it be Pitney Bowes/BlueCrest? 🤔 Which, btw-The judge on that case has been switched out for an Obama appointee. What happens when a government agency goes rogue & the federal judicial system has failed? 🤔

Video Transcript AI Summary
For two and a half years, we've been trying to find out who paid for the Jesse Morgan truck. The postal service changed their document retention policy from 6 years to 30 days in April 2020, and then changed it back in March 2021. They destroyed some documents after the election. They got a federal judge, Emmett Sullivan, to sign off on this change. When they finally turned over the requested information in October 2020, they had whited out the important dates. Their own lawyer reprimanded them for not following the law. They refuse to disclose the information, even if ordered by a federal judge. The government is going rogue and disrespecting the judge overseeing the case. The new judge is an Obama appointee, and it seems like they're trying to delay until their own people are in power.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've been trying for two and a half years to find out who paid for that Jesse Morgan truck. For 2 years, they danced and fought and fought. Now that's supposed to be public records, but the postal service changed their look back policy from keeping documents for 6 years to keeping documents for 30 days. They changed that in April 2020. They got through the election, destroyed a bunch of stuff. In March 2021, they changed it back to 6 years. Just you know, federal agencies can't do that willy nilly. There's something called the Administrative Procedures Act where they have to put it up for public comment, explain things, get comment, go back. It's been around 50 years, this system. They can't just do that willy nilly unless they get a federal judge to sign off on it. In this case, the postal service got a federal judge to sign off on it. It was the Emmett Sullivan, who's the same knucklehead who went after an inquisition on Michael Flynn after the DOJ dropped the charges, after they did their own internal investigation, said this should never been brought, we dropped the charges. That judge would not and at first in America, that judge would not let it go. Well, that's Emmett Sullivan, intellectual doofus, same judge who signed off. I'm living in the postal service, play these Mickey Mouse games. So we fought for 2 years. They finally finally had to turn the piece of paper over. And when they turned it over, which was October 2020, the payments they made, they had they left everything in for all of October except for the 2 or 3 days we cared about. Those dates, the information they wiped out, they whited out. Their own lawyer said you can't do this. Their own DOJ lawyer reprimanded them and sent a letter that got into our heads. Was like, you have to start following the law, telling his own client, the judge has said you got to turn it over, turn it over. They turned it over, it was whited out. We went back and they said that's right. They've answered now in writing. We are never going to tell you that information that was in those 3 lines we whited out. We're not gonna tell it. Even if we get an order from a federal judge, we are not closed out. So that's the government going rogue. That is the government going rogue. They are now giving a finger to a sitting federal judge. But guess what? The federal judge that was over this case and managing it correctly, albeit slowly in my view, but correctly, that judge got promoted, and a new judge got moved in to take the case, and that's a Obama appointee. So I guess they just think they can do this all over the country everywhere, this tap dancing until all of their totalitarian people have been moved into place and then everything becomes moot. But it doesn't work like that.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

To tie it back to the start of this thread… The article that features Byrne is super important WE make it go viral. Media is ignoring him & his story & is too scared to touch it. I shared it with @gatewaypundit thinking Jim isn’t scared of anything. Nothing yet. You can download a copy for free from Byrne’s DeepCapture website https://www.deepcapture.com/2023/07/patrick-byrne-dhs-domestic-extremist-1-comes-clean/ You can also buy a hard copy from Amazon. Search “domestic extremist #1”. Twitter won’t let me post a link. I couldn’t get my hubby to read the electronic version, but he’s reading the magazine. Buy copies for family & friends. Guaranteed this will be a historical document. Or wait to buy an autographed copy - Byrne May do a fundraiser to help fund all these projects.

DHS Domestic Extremist #1 Comes Clean – Deep Capture deepcapture.com
greg_price11
Posted - August 2, 2023 at 2:41 AM
Saved - August 2, 2023 at 3:48 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
51 former intelligence officials, including 5 ex-CIA heads, claimed Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation during the 2020 election. However, it was later revealed that the laptop was real and coordinated with Joe Biden's campaign. Some officials admitted doing it to help Biden win. Surprisingly, none of them face charges for defrauding the US, and they retain their security clearances. Meanwhile, Donald Trump is charged with defrauding the US for challenging the election. The DC elite prioritize their power over the nation's well-being.

@greg_price11 - Greg Price

Reminder: 51 former intelligence officials, including five former heads of the CIA, went on the record during the 2020 election to say that Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation. We later learned that not only was the laptop was in fact real, but they did it in coordination with Joe Biden's campaign and a few of them have even admitted they did it because they wanted Joe Biden to win. Not only have none of them been charged for "Conspiracy to defraud the United States" but all of them still have their security clearances today.

@greg_price11 - Greg Price

Instead the person being charged with "Conspiracy To Defraud The United States" is Donald Trump for saying that the 2020 election was rigged and stolen, as well as constitutionally challenging the election in court. The permanent DC class will destroy our country to protect their own power.

ScottAdamsSays
Posted - August 3, 2023 at 12:18 PM
Saved - August 3, 2023 at 1:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Trump indictments could expose flaws in the American election process, revealing its unreliability. Complex systems, like elections, tend to become corrupt over time. Congress and financial markets are already influenced or rigged. Our elections lack transparency and are vulnerable to hacking or manipulation. While we can't prove if the 2020 election was rigged, the system itself allows for rigging. Trusting the election requires trust in a party known for hoaxes. President Trump's experience suggests the election was manipulated. Betting against his instincts and assuming clean elections defy reality.

@ScottAdamsSays - Scott Adams

The most entertaining (and therefore most likely?) outcome of the Trump indictments would be putting the American election process on trial and showing the country we don't have a reliable system for knowing who won ANY election. How hard would it be to convince one or more jurors an election MIGHT have been rigged? I could convince all twelve in five minutes and I wouldn't need any charts or data to do it. Don't believe me? I'll demonstrate here. Fact: Any system with lots of participants, complexity, and high stakes will become corrupt over time. That is true of every observed human-made system since the beginning of recorded history. The only mystery is WHEN the corruption happens. For example, we know Congress is influenced by the military-industrial complex, and we know the financial markets are increasingly rigged for the big players. Every complex human-made system of high value becomes corrupt over time, no matter what kind of controls are in place. There has never been an exception. That's because bad actors have an incentive to peck away until they find a hole to crawl through. Our elections are not fully auditable. We don't see the computer code for the machines. We don't know if mail-in ballots were discarded before reaching the drop box. We don't know if any bad actors hacked any part of it. And we certainly don't know if there are innovative ways to rig an election that have not yet been discovered. We can't know for sure if any particular election -- such as 2020 -- was rigged. But we can know for sure the current design of our election systems guarantees rigging at some point. And we can know for sure that the voting results for 2020 violated historical patterns so drastically any reasonable person would have some questions. A reasonable person can believe the 2020 election was fair, but ask yourself how much of your opinion is influenced by your patriotism and wishful thinking about how things should be? Trusting an American election requires trust in the party that brought you the Russia Collusion Hoax, the Hunter laptop hoax, and about 20 others. Would that cast of characters hesitate to rig an election if they could get away with it? Remember, no one was arrested for any of the hoax behavior. President Trump has lived in the real world of business and politics for longer than most of you have been alive. He knows how the real world works. He has seen it from the inside. His instincts told him the election was gamed in some way. How much of your own money would you bet that Mr. Trump's instincts about the election are wrong? Would you bet everything you have? In order to find Mr. Trump guilty, you have to bet against his experience in spotting sketchy behavior, and you have to believe all 50 states ran clean elections in the context of no other complex, human-made system of high value ever being entirely clean. -- end --

KanekoaTheGreat
Posted - September 18, 2023 at 7:17 PM
Saved - September 19, 2023 at 2:57 PM

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

Russell Brand highlights prior warnings from Hillary Clinton, VP Kamala Harris, and Senator Amy Klobuchar that the U.S. election system is connected to the internet, compromised, and vulnerable to hackers. See the detailed 70-post thread below. https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1648462770936115202

Video Transcript AI Summary
Democrats have long criticized the vulnerability of voting machines and the potential for hacking. They argue that all voting machines need to be examined to ensure they are secure. They specifically mention Dominion voting machines as being susceptible to hacking. They claim that these machines can be easily hacked and that the results of elections have been questioned for a long time. They also highlight the issue of outdated and vulnerable machines in some states. However, they are accused of only raising these concerns when they lose elections. Republicans have also challenged election results in the past. The overall message is that there are doubts about the integrity of elections and the influence of powerful interests.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The democrats who have been saying that there are rigged elections, problematic machines, problems with voting systems for a long time now. But who are you gonna believe, the mainstream media or your own lion eyes? Let's have a look. Speaker 1: Virginia just stopped using touchscreen computer voting because it's so vulnerable. Right. We need to look at All the voting machines. Every secretary of state needs to be, you know, assisted in making sure that they are not being, hacked and attack. Speaker 2: I continue to think that our voting machines are too vulnerable. For researchers have repeatedly demonstrated that ballot recording machines and other voting systems are susceptible to tampering. Speaker 0: So you don't like the voting machines? What about the Dominion ones? Speaker 3: Even hackers with limited prior knowledge, tools and resources are able to breach voting machines in a matter of minutes. Speaker 0: So you see, in microcosm, democracy means we get a mandate for what we wanna do anyway? In the event we lose, we complain about the system. The Republicans do it and plainly, as you just saw, the Democrats to do it. Speaker 4: In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted votes for certain candidates or switched votes from 1 candidate to another. Speaker 2: The biggest Seller of voting machines is doing something that violates cybersecurity 101, directing that you install remote access software which would make a machine like that, You know, a magnet for fraudsters and hackers. These voting machines can be hacked quite easily. Speaker 0: So the legitimacy of elections and the results of elections is something that's been queried for a long time. Here are voices of the Democrat party in various settings making the exact same claim. Speaker 3: You could easily hack into them. It makes it seem like all these states are doing different things. But in fact, 3 companies are controlling that. It is The individual voting machines that some pose that pose some of the greatest risks. Speaker 1: There are a Speaker 3: lot of states that are dealing with antiquated Machines, right, which are vulnerable to being hacked. Speaker 0: So basically, they just say stuff unless they win. Unless they win, they say the problem is the machine. You don't see any more politicians going, listen, we lost fair and square, but ultimately, we all love America, and we want American people to See. Speaker 2: Workers were able to easily hack into an electronic voting machine. It was possible to switch votes. 43% of American voters use voting genes that researchers have found have serious security flaws including backdoors. Speaker 0: Backdoors. I think that, Dominion needs to look into Ron Wyden. He hates voting machines. Backdoors, they've got bad breath and stinking little dicks. Speaker 2: We know how vulnerable now our systems were. We know I know that hackathon that took place last year, where virtually every machine was broken into fairly quickly. Speaker 0: Oh, my god. All of them. They're all broken. None of them were led Dominion watching this. Speaker 3: I actually held a demonstration for my colleagues here at the Capitol, where we brought in, folks who, before our eyes, hacked election machines. Speaker 0: These are the same people that after Trump made the claims that the election was rigorous, that's Possible. How dare you say that? You, sir, are a disgrace to democracy. And you keep causing insurrections. And your hair's ridiculous. And your orange? And that's all there really is to discuss. This once again shows you there are no ultimate values or principles. There's just rhetoric attached to achieving the outcomes that they would prefer to achieve that are themselves tethered to financial interests that they're personally affected by? Look at all the nepotism. Look at all the stock ownership and look at the way they legislate on the behalf of big business. Speaker 5: I'm very concerned that you could have a hack that finally went through. You have 21 states that were hacked Didn't too. They didn't find out about it for a year. Speaker 3: It is worth fighting for integrity in our election system, which means that they are free From interference by a hostile or an unfriendly nation. Speaker 0: Like Russia, for example. No evidence of that at all. Absolutely no evidence. Completely cooked up media concoction in conjunction with the Democrat pie. Speaker 3: And there's a saying that I'm sure many of you have heard, which is the, Do you know the difference between being hacked and not being hacked? Speaker 2: Mhmm. Go on. Speaker 3: Is knowing you've been hacked. Speaker 0: Yeah. You know? Okay. Don't do that joke again. Hillary, how do you feel about voting machines? Do you have a principled perspective on them that will not change depending on whether you win or lose an election. The opinion will stay the same. Right? Speaker 1: There are some text experts in Silicon Valley Valley with whom I have met, who say that, you know, maybe what they'll do this next time is to really disrupt the actual election. Shut down the servers that you send results to. Interfere with the operation of voting machines because still Too many of them are linked to the Internet. So they're we are still very vulnerable. Speaker 0: Why don't they just accept that Some people vote for Donald Trump because they're disillusioned with the political class. Why don't we all accept more broadly that the problem is deeply systemic and is a result of the ability of powerful deep state and corporate interests to manipulate the congressional and democratic process to the point where democracy is sort of a facade. K? So after the 2016 election, the democrats said there's a problem with vote machines, but after the 2020 election, there's no problem with vote machines. What an amazing miracle. After Republican victories in 2000, 2004, and 2016? Democrats in Congress used the formal counting of electoral votes as an opportunity to challenge election results. Derek Muller, a law professor at the University of Iowa wrote in a New York Times opinion piece in 2021. In January 2001, representative Maxine Waters joined several other democrats challenging George w Bush's victory, claiming Florida's electoral votes were fraudulent. In January 2005, after Bush's reelection, senator Barbara Boxer, formally challenged Ohio's electoral vote even though Bush won Ohio by more than 118,000 votes. Wait. Let's recount that because what they've done is that 118,000 votes could have been done by a little Cyber Lego hacker that gets in the machine. Did you see The Lego Movie? They're bastards. In January 2017 after Trump's victory, representative Sheila Jackson Lee, said there was the malfunction of 87 voting machines, and representative Jim McGovern, Democrat Massachusetts, said there were confirmed and illegal activities engaged by the government of Russia in the 2016 elections. Then as now, each member of congress was within their rights to make an objection, Chenmuller wrote. But the objections were naive at best, shameless at worst. Either way, the readiness of members of Congress to disenfranchise millions of Americans was disconcerting. And now there's Stacey Abrams, the Democrat who ran for governor of Georgia, who claims that Brian Kemp, the Republican who beat her 4 years ago, won under the rules of the game at The time that the game was rigged against the voters of Georgia. Fraudulent electoral votes, malfunctioning voting machines, rigged elections. Sound familiar? Well, yeah. It does, actually. It sounds like exactly what's being claimed right now. How is it different? If the election results go their way, these are some of the best electoral machines we have ever How dare you criticize those this Dominion Voting Machine's been like a brother to you. How dare you criticize it? You lost The election? You little son of a bitch. You little Russian racist son of a fuck. Speaker 3: I sit on the Senate Intelligence Committee and Senate Homeland Security Committee. And we receive all kinds of information about the vulnerabilities to our national security. We are vulnerable in terms of Foreign interference with our elections. Speaker 0: Did you see that on the road to the White House 2020? So when they're on the way to the White House, oh my god, we could lose. The voting machines, if we do lose, they are Terrible voting machines. They could be hacked by, you know, a Russian with a hat with snow in their boots with cancer like Putin bastards, son of bitches. You've won the election. Those are some of the best Folding machines? Look at this little guy. I love it. What a reliable folding machine. How can I stay mad at you?

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

🚨BREAKING: Explosive video surfaces of FOX News stars Tucker Carlson, Laura Ingraham, and Sean Hannity slamming Trump's "insane" voting machine fraud allegations as "absurd," "ridiculous," and "complete BS"!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Virginia has stopped using touchscreen computer voting due to vulnerabilities, and there is concern about the security of voting machines across the country. Researchers have shown that voting systems can be tampered with, and hackers with limited resources can breach machines in minutes. Instances of electronic voting machines deleting or switching votes have been reported. The biggest seller of voting machines has violated cybersecurity principles by installing remote access software, making the machines susceptible to hacking. Three companies control the majority of voting machines in the US. Many states have outdated and vulnerable machines, and some lack backup paper ballots. The machines often run on unsupported software, making them more vulnerable to cyber attacks. The use of modems in voting machines also poses a risk, as they can be connected to the internet. The lack of forensic evidence and audit trails further undermines the security of the machines. The vulnerabilities in the voting system could lead to a compromised election and a loss of faith in the democratic process.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Virginia just stopped using touchscreen computer voting because it's so vulnerable. We need to look at all the voting machines. Every secretary of state needs to be, you know, assisted in making sure that they are not being, hacked and and attacked. Speaker 1: I continue to think that our voting machines are too vulnerable. Speaker 2: Researchers have repeatedly demonstrated that ballot recording machines and other voting systems are susceptible to tampering. Speaker 3: Even hackers with limited prior knowledge, Tools and resources are able to breach voting machines in a matter of minutes. Speaker 4: In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted votes for certain candidates or switch votes from 1 candidate to another. Speaker 2: The biggest seller of voting machines is doing something that violates Cybersecurity 101 directing that you install remote access software which would make a machine like that, you know, a magnet for fraudsters and hackers. These voting machines Can be hacked quite easily. Speaker 5: You could easily hack into them. It makes it seem like all these states are doing Different things, but in fact, 3 companies are controlling this. Speaker 0: It is the individual voting machines that some pose that pose some of the greatest risk. Speaker 6: There are a lot of states that are dealing with antiquated machines, right, which are vulnerable to being hacked. Speaker 7: Workers were able to easily We hacked into an electronic voting machine. Speaker 2: It was possible to switch votes. 43% of American voters use voting machines That researchers have found have serious security flaws, including backdoors. Speaker 8: We know how vulnerable now our systems were. We know, I know the Hackathon that took place last year, where virtually every machine was broken into fairly quickly. Speaker 5: I actually held a demonstration for my colleagues here at the Capitol, where we brought in, folks who before our eyes hacked election machines. Those that are not those that are being used in many states. Speaker 3: Aging systems also frequently rely on unsupported software Like Windows XP in 2000, which may not receive regular security patches and are thus more vulnerable to the latest methods of cyber attack. Speaker 7: In a close presidential election, they just need to hack 1 swing state or maybe 1 or 2 or maybe just a few counties in one I'm Speaker 9: very concerned that you could have a hack that finally went through. You have 21 states that were hacked into. They didn't find out about it for a year. Right now, we have over a dozen dozen states that either don't have any backup paper ballots or only have them partially. You think that our adversaries don't know what those states are? Of course, they know what those states are. And if we have a close election In the general election, in a presidential race, and one state's out withstanding and their ballot boxes gets hacked into, their elections get hacked into, We will have absolutely no backup. Speaker 8: I know America's voting machines are vulnerable because my colleagues and I have hacked them repeatedly. We've created attacks that can spread from machine to machine like a computer virus and silently change election outcomes. And in every single case, we've found ways for attackers to sabotage machines and to steal votes. Across the country, there are about 50 Two different models of machines. They fall into essentially 2 styles, ones that scan a piece of paper or ones where the vote, the voter just interacts with the touch screen and many of them have been analyzed now by researchers Looking for security vulnerabilities. In every single case where a US voting Machine has been analyzed by by competent security researchers. They have found vulnerabilities that would let someone inject malicious software And change election data every single case. Speaker 10: The better or the more efficient way of hacking machines would be to subvert them all through the machine that's used to actually Program those machines. So prior to each election, the county election office or the voting machine vendor will actually program memory cards For that election, it tells the machine who are the candidates, what are the, you know, the contests being decided, and that gets inserted Into the voting machine. If you can alter, if you can subvert that machine that is used to program those memory cards, then you can pass, rogue software to the voting machines. Speaker 8: Voting Chains are not connected to the internet. This is something that you hear all the time in the US from election officials. Unfortunately, it's not actually true. In many new voting machines Come with, 4 gs wireless modems so that they can be connected to the internet from the polling place in order to upload the results faster. Now to me that sounds crazy. Why would you want to put your voting machines on the internet right in the middle of the election potentially at the most vulnerable time? Speaker 11: Studies conducted in 2007 by the state of California, state of Ohio, state of Florida found security vulnerabilities that could take advantage of these To engineer viruses where 1 compromised voting machine could then infect eventually the entire fleet of machines for an entire county. Typically at the end of the election day you move a memory card through each of the machines in the precinct and that's to collect the vote totals. That process can spread a virus. And there are other processes. The details vary from machine to machine. Speaker 2: When you say hacked, what were they able to do once they gained access to the machines? Speaker 1: All sorts of things. They could manipulate the outcome Of the vote, they could manipulate the tally, they could delete the tally, and and they could compromise the vote in any number of ways. Speaker 12: The machines used in Georgia Have been demonstrated to be hackable through a virus that's carried on ballot definition cartridges. Very much like this Duxnet virus was, Inserted into, nuclear centrifuges in Iran. Speaker 1: There are a number of states that outsource their reporting of elections to third parties, some of which are corporations based in other countries Trees like Spain. So you've got to trust that the aggregation of the votes and the reporting of the votes is is, is accurate as well. Speaker 8: I'm Pretty sure my undergrad computer security class at Michigan could have changed the outcome of the 2016 Michigan election if we wanted to. It is that bad. And we have a combination of very powerful adversaries and unfortunately quite vulnerable and obsolete systems. That's that's why I say it's only a matter of time. Speaker 13: Unfortunately, in a lot of these systems, the audit trails are just as vulnerable as the other aspects of the system. So there may not be Good forensic evidence of a successful, intrusion. With the current design, we cannot be universally confident that it hasn't happened. And it's probably only a matter of time before it will. Speaker 3: In at least 40 states, elections are carried out using machines They're at least a decade old. And like any technology, they're susceptible to increasing failure with age. Some state officials Have had to turn to eBay to find critical components like dot matrix printers, decades old storage devices and analog modems. Aging systems also frequently rely on unsupported software like Windows XP in 2000, which may not receive regular security patches And are thus more vulnerable to the latest methods of cyber attack. Speaker 4: In 2016, state election websites in Illinois and Arizona were hacked by intruders who installed malware and downloaded sensitive voter information. Speaker 6: It is worth fighting for integrity in our election system, which means that they are free From interference by a hostile or an unfriendly nation. Let's put the resources into upgrading the state's election systems. Because what we know is this. There are a lot of states that are dealing with antiquated machines, right, which are vulnerable to being hacked. Speaker 5: I sit on the Senate Intelligence Committee and Senate Homeland Security Committee and we receive all kinds of information about the vulnerabilities to our national We are vulnerable in terms of foreign interference with our elections. It's my understanding that some of the election system vendors have Acquired states to sign agreements, that prevent or inhibit independent security testing. There's a saying that I'm sure many of you have heard, which is the Do you know the difference between being hacked and not being hacked? Is knowing you've been hacked. Speaker 0: And they are still looking for ways to steal information about voter registration, for example. There are some tech experts in Silicon Valley Valley with whom I have met who say that, you know, maybe what they'll do this Next time is to really disrupt the actual election. Shut down the servers that you send results to. Interfere with the operation of voting machines because still too many of them are linked to the Internet. So there we are still very vulnerable. Speaker 14: I mean, I can tell you in Virginia, when I was governor, I had to replace all the machines. Because I remember when I first voted, when I went to Richmond, moved down as governor, I remember I kept voting in the senate race, kept voting for the democrat, republican name kept coming up. Three times that happened. Speaker 15: What do you mean kept coming up? Speaker 14: So I you know, we had the touch screens. I was voting for Mark Warner, our senator, and Ed Goswami's name would light up. Happened to me 3 times. Finally, the 4th time, Mark Damon, I quickly hit vote and I got out of there. You know, all the cameras are looking at me like this guy doesn't know how to vote. I mean, what's going on? So then I had an investigation done and listen to this. I brought in some technology experts. They were able to hack into our machines from off-site in about 5 or 6 minutes. And within 4 minutes, they were able to change a vote. IDD certified all the machines. Now in Virginia, we have paper ballots. Speaker 2: 43% Of American voters use voting machines that researchers have found have serious security flaws, Including backdoors. These companies are accountable to no one. They won't answer basic Questions about their cybersecurity practices and the biggest companies won't answer any questions at all. 5 states have no paper trail, and that means there is no way to prove the numbers The voting machines put out are legitimate. So much for cybersecurity One zero one. The vast majority of 10,000 election jurisdictions nationwide Use election management systems that run on old software that is soon gonna be out of date And write for exploitation by hackers according to an exhaustive analysis By Speaker 0: the Associated Speaker 2: Press, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Florida, Iowa, Indiana, Arizona, and North Carolina, among others, are all at risk. Even the state of Georgia, which just passed legislation to buy new voting machines, is on track To buy equipment that suffers from this significant cybersecurity weakness. Let's say the election Is decided by a small percentage. And people in America Don't think that the election was fair. The effect that would have on our 200 year Experiment in self governance. Our democratic system would take a real hit. Our elections weren't secure last week, and they sure as heck aren't secure this week. And anybody who says otherwise is either selling the voting machines or simply has a malicious Intent towards our elections. At one point in the Intelligence Committee, Both sides seem to agree that no votes were changed in the 2016 election. And I said, the experts I talk to say that until you have a Forensic analysis of a vote until you go in there and scrub the whole system. You can't really say that. Speaker 16: These machines don't have a capability of providing you forensic evidence To see if they cannot prove they were honest, they cannot prove that they were have been hacked. They simply don't have the Fundamental basic capabilities of providing you that forensic evidence, that data. Only way you can see That, that machine was hacked. If the attacker wanted to be, they found that it was hacked. That's a sad truth. So anyone who says, I have information one way or another. That's an opinion. That's not tactics. Practice, it can be done without leaving trace. When you know how the systems work, Looking for the evidence, you know that you won't find it because the systems are not recording, generating, Preserving or protecting meaningful forensic evidence. And this is from the very beginning to the end of the process everywhere. These systems really don't have a capability of recording and protecting any meaningful audit information or forensically important information. So a lot of times I would also argue that even if you try to take a look into the evidence, the problem is that there is no Speaker 17: We've heard a lot from voting machine vendors and election officials that voting machines Can't be hacked because they're not connected to the internet. All of those vulnerabilities that Andrew talked about, are not a problem because no one can access the machines And it turns out that that message that they've been giving us for years and particularly after the 2016 election Just isn't true. Voting machine vendors have sold election officials on these in use of modems. In some case, the modems are embedded inside the voting machines. In other case, they're external modems that get attached to the voting machine at the end of the election. So at the end of the election, the machine goes Into shutdown mode and then this option pops up about modoming results. And so the system will automatically then dial in and send these votes over a cellular modem to a server on the Internet that collects the results. So everyone will tell you and they've told me every time I've spoken with them that cellular modems are not really internet connectivity. They will say, That doesn't mean that the machine is connected to the internet. It's using a cellular modem. Well, that's not true and Election Systems and Software, which is The top voting machine maker in the country, this is one of their statements over and over again with the public but this is one of their own diagrams that they They gave to Rhode Island in 2015. And if you see that circular part in the center there showing that that modem transmission using the wireless modem, They sit there, right there. It's on their own diagram that is going over the internet. Speaker 8: Before every election, election officials have to program the voting machines With who's on the ballot and what are the rules for counting? Well, they make that election programming on a PC workstation somewhere either at the, at the jurisdiction or at an outside vendor that does it for them. If an attacker can break into that work Station which is called an election management system. They can spread malicious code to all of the memory cards used to program all of the voting machines in the jurisdiction And those election management system workstations sometimes are connected to the internet or the data that's programmed into them passes Through an internet connected system. So we're just 1 or 2 hops away from an online attacker. So if I wanted to break into this company, let's say I was the attacker, I'd Probably start by forging an email from, let's say, Larry, the president here, to Sue, his administrative assistant, Asking her to urgently open an attachment. Now, of course, when she does, that attachment has my malware in it. I have a, foothold into their network And I can try to spread from there to the election management system and to the voting machines in most of the state. Pampering with the national election result in my country It's easier than well easier than even I thought in 2016. I keep learning things that convince me that the situation is scarier than, than even Fertz had thought, You identify the states that are most weakly protected and going to be close. Target the computers that are going to program voting machines there, spread malware to machines to change a fraction of the votes And then rely on the fact that most states even if they have a paper record are not going to rigorously use it to check that the computers are right. But the fact is that in close national contests in the US, the result really only hinges on the result in a small number of States. You've heard about the swing states in any given election. The ones that are, really competitive. In such a situation an attacker can, before the election, identify which states are likely to be close. Try probing all of them In the way that the Russians did the voter registration systems in 2016 and just find the weakest swing states and attack there. So in this way, the American system converts, diversity of implementation Into basically this patchwork of strength and weakness that gives attackers a menu of possible places to strike. It makes us weaker in close elections. Speaker 18: Modems in voting machines are a bad idea. Those modems are network connections. And that leaves them vulnerable to hacking by anybody who can connect To that network. Speaker 19: ES and S insists while there are 14,000 of its modems in use, there are firewalls separating those modems from the public Internet. Speaker 18: Once the hackers starts talking to the voting machine through the modem, they can hack the software in the voting machine And make it cheat in future elections. Speaker 20: What is the vehicle for the transmission from the ICP? Is it cellular modem versus VPN? Speaker 15: Well, it is a cellular modem that Speaker 8: the can be configured in a VPN. Right? And we currently in Chicago and Cook County, we work with Verizon to, Secure that network. What wireless chipset slash modem does the hardware have? We support a variety. So, it's really up to the jurisdictions what technology they wanna use, what's compatible with their with their networks. Speaker 15: Currently, in some jurisdictions, we're using, basically, a modem that is a three d modem, GSM, but we can support multiple Variety support and protection. Speaker 8: Including including latest four gs standards. Speaker 20: So the answers to the next question is the three gs or four gs. Verizon 8 tier Do you're Sprint consuming all? Speaker 16: Oh, yeah. All all networks. Right. Speaker 8: Discuss quite a bit. Yeah. I mean, we actually transmit from the ICP in Mongolia as well. So, we're not committed in networks. Speaker 15: And in Puerto Rico, there's 3 vendors because the island is not covered by any by any of the vendors With this, we use 3 different cellular vendors for some ICPs. With this vendor, Claro, ATMC, and T Mobile, I might say, in the different parts Speaker 16: More modern voting machines, they actually have a mobile phone modem. In to speak, they have a they have mobile phone our mobile phone connectivity to county headquarters, they are sending the results. Speaker 1: Some jurisdictions are relying on uploading election To results using cellular modems or, the Internet that of course introduces another point of vulnerability, not just to the data that's flowing, But also it's the software, the devices that, that are being connected. Speaker 10: Many of these voting machines have modems embedded into them. And the modems are to transmit the vote totals on election night to the county, elections office. So these modems contact, they're cellular modems and they Contact the cellular network, to contact the cell tower. So the cell tower traffic these days in our modern times actually goes through Internet. It goes through the same Kinds of routers and switches not the regular internet traffic comes to but also, in between that cell tower and that voting machine, an intruder Can, intercept data going to the cell tower and intercept that that communication, that phone call. If you can trick a voting machine into, contacting In your device your fake cellular tower instead of a legitimate tower you can actually use that connection to get back into the voting machine and get back into the tabulator, and then alter votes and software. Speaker 8: So just to review, you look at the polls before the election and figure out which states were likely to be close. Probe all of them. Find the ones with the weakest protection. Then hack into the, election management systems there or at the outside vendors the states use. Once you hack into the election management system, can spread malicious code to individual voting machines and have your code say swap 10% of the votes in the places you infected.
DrEtiquette
Posted - December 29, 2023 at 3:02 AM
Saved - December 29, 2023 at 5:53 PM

@DrEtiquette - DR. ETIQUETTE 🤦‍♂️

Remember when they told us that voting machines weren’t connected to the internet? 🤦‍♂️ https://t.co/UgW93VwdkD

Video Transcript AI Summary
Contrary to the current political narrative, the speaker emphasizes that voting machines are not connected to the internet and the Department of Homeland Security claims the 2020 election was secure. However, in 2018, there were instances of electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleting or switching votes. The speaker mentions that hackers were able to breach these machines easily, even with limited knowledge and resources. They also mention the concern of remote access software making the machines vulnerable to fraudsters and hackers. The speaker then addresses the controversy surrounding Dominion, stating that there were no switched or deleted votes involving their machines and that the company has no ties to communism or China. However, there are concerns that some machines may be connected to the internet despite being designed as closed systems.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Contrary to the current political narrative, the election systems and their equipment were connected to the Internet, making them infinitely hackable. Voting machines themselves are not connected to the Internet. No voting machines are connected to the Internet. The devices are not connected to the Internet. Speaker 1: They do not connect to Speaker 0: the Internet. Those things are not connected To the Internet, the Department of Homeland Security says the 2020 election was the most secure in American history. The 2020 election was the most secure in US history. That's what they say now, but just a short while ago, the political narrative was very different. In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia Texas deleted votes for certain candidates or switched votes from 1 candidate to another. We brought in, folks who, before our eyes, hacked election Machines. Workers were able to easily hack into an electronic voting machine. It was possible to switch votes. Even hackers with limited prior knowledge, Tools and resources are able to breach phoning machines in a matter of minutes. Speaker 1: Remote access software, which would make a machine like that, You know, a magnet for fraudsters and hackers. Unfortunately, Dominion has recently been thrust into the national spotlight As part of a dangerous and reckless disinformation campaign aimed at sowing doubt and confusion over the 2020 presidential election. 1st, there were no switched or deleted votes involving Dominion machines. Dominion is not and has never been a front for communists. The company also does not have any ties to China whatsoever, including no ties, including investment Or source code transfer. Let me be clear, modem systems are by design meant to be used as closed systems that are not networked, Meaning that they are not connected to the Internet. Sounds like some of these machines are showing the tabulators can and and are connected to the Internet.
Real_RobN
Posted - January 27, 2024 at 6:38 PM
Saved - January 27, 2024 at 8:36 PM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Election deniers, conspiracy theorists, hallucinators and schizophrenics, listen up, “We have video tape of Jackie Amos inserting thumb drives into machines” “I personally observed USB cards uploaded to machines 24✖️as of today 47 USB cards are missing and no where to be found” https://t.co/KN92bF8qTR

Video Transcript AI Summary
I have evidence of a conspiracy and correspondence regarding my election. The chairperson, Jackie Amos, received a text supporting me and responded that I won but would take action against David Archie. I request that Jackie Amos and Sandra McCall step down from their positions in the Hinds County Democratic Party. We have evidence of Jackie Amos engaging in fraudulent activities during the election. This issue extends beyond the party and concerns all citizens in Mississippi. It is an opportunity to combat corruption and fraud in elections statewide.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I provided each of you with a copy of the information in her, conspiracy and correspondence to someone concerning my election on August 8th. I cannot read all and everything that she said on this, paper, because some of it, the words are not fit to use. She correspond with an individual. That individual call the chairperson, Jackie Amos, or texted chairperson, Jackie Amos, and stated, hey. Don't let them cheat Deborah Dixon out of her election. She won fair and square. Jackie Aymond respond to that text was that she won, but I'm going to f David Archie on the site. This matter came from a the chairperson of the Hinds County Democratic Party. And so on today, we asking that the Hinds County Democratic party take immediate action. We're asking that she step down from her position as high end county chairperson of the Democratic Party along with Sandra McCall, who is the secretary, who is her running buddy in and around this election. We have videotape of Jackie Amos going into boxes, bringing in thumb drives, bringing in, ballots to be inserted into machines. We have pictures of Jackie Amos, participating in what we think that is fraud as well as corruption. And so we wanna be absolutely clear that this matter is not only with the Hinds County Democratic Party, but this matter is with every citizen in the state of Mississippi. This is the opportunity to stop corruption and to stop fraud when it comes to elections in the state of missus
Video Transcript AI Summary
Last week, Miss Walker asked Mr. Zach about the whereabouts of the media sticks. He repeatedly claimed not to know where they were. Miss Walker urged him to find them. Eventually, on Friday afternoon, Mr. Zach located the media sticks. Surprisingly, they were not in his office vault but with election commissioner Mr. Clark. When asked about the source of the media sticks, Mr. Clark did not provide an answer. He argued that he had the right to be involved in the election, despite the law stating that the items should be kept in Mr. Zach's vault.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now I wanna share the media sticks. On Wednesday the of last week, the first day of the review, I say to mister Zach, where are the media sticks? Listen close. It's recorded. Mister Zach says to us, I do not know where the media sticks are, miss Walker. I said, do you recognize those are brains? Miss Walker, I do not know where the sticks are. That's on Wednesday. I then asked him on Thursday morning, where are the media sticks? He says, miss Walker, I do not know where the media sticks are. I said, could you at least try to find out, mister Zach? I need the media sticks. On Friday morning, I asked mister Zach, where are the media sticks? I don't know, miss Walker. I said, please try to find the media sticks. We did late lunch. When we returned, I said, you got those sticks, mister Zach. Not yet, miss Walker, but I'm working on it. I stand before you to tell you that about 2:30 on Friday afternoon, mister Zach located the media sticks. No, sir. No, ma'am. They were not in the vault at his office locked up. They were here in this building with election commissioner mister Clark. Mister Clark said to me I asked him, when did you get them? I'm not sure of the date that I received it. Who did you get them from? Who gave them to you? He did not answer that question. He advises me that he had the right to be involved with this election. The law does not dictate that he's the custodial person of anything. Those items are to be locked in mister Zach's vault.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker points out several issues with the handling of numbers in the election. The numbers were not stored securely in a sealed bag but in a red canvas bag without a lock. Moreover, they were mixed together, which is against the law. The speaker also accuses Mr. Clark of keeping the media sticks instead of handing them over to Mr. Zach. The speaker advises checking with Mr. Clark as he may still have them. These actions are in violation of the law of Mississippi.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In in addition to that, those numbers were not even in a sealed, locked bag. It was a red canvas bag with no lock. To make matters worse, they were all commingled. It was well over a 100. The law does not allow me to handle materials outside of the precinct that I'm representing. To make matters even worse, mister Clark had the audacity to walk back to his office and keep the media sticks. He never turned them over to mister Zach. He never in our present turn those sticks over to mister Zach. So before you leave, check with mister Clark. He still may have them in his possession. These are outside of the statues, not not thus says Cynthia Walker, but thus says the law of Mississippi.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker witnessed multiple instances where the Delaware County Board of Elections did not follow proper procedures during the election. They personally saw the voting machine warehouse supervisor uploading USB cards into the machines without being observed. The speaker raised concerns to the deputy sheriff and the clerk of elections, but their objections were ignored. It was later revealed that the warehouse manager usually inserts a few USBs into the machines after each election, but the number observed was unusually high. Currently, 47 USB cards are missing and cannot be located.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: All cases, the chain of custody and the procedures that were defined by the Delaware County Board of Elections and election process review were all they didn't follow 1. I couldn't even redline this multipage document because the entire document would be, they didn't follow any of the procedures. So I personally observed USB cards being uploaded to voting machines by the, the, voting machine warehouse supervisor on multiple occasions. I saw this personally. I brought it to the attention of the deputy sheriff who was there stationed, who was a senior law enforcement officer, and I brought it to the attention of the clerk of elections. I brought it to their attention. I objected. And I said, this person is not being observed. He's not part of the process that I can see. And he's walking in with baggies, which we have pictures of and it was submitted to in our affidavits. And he was sticking these USBs into the machines. So, I personally witnessed over that. That happened 24 times over 24 times. We have multiple other witnesses to start, including Democrat poll watchers. And we were told, I was told the next day by, the, solicitors, v well, actually, not the solicitor, but the attorney that we had secured, that they said every election, they leave a couple of USBs in the voting machines and they're brought back. And, generally, the warehouse manager comes over and puts them in. So in talking to, US Attorney General, McSwain, and other law enforcement officers, I found out that was not The case that generally, you know, more than more than 2 is unusual. So they denied they did it. But, as of today, 47 USBV cards are missing, and they're nowhere to be found.
csharpner
Posted - March 19, 2024 at 2:17 PM
Saved - March 19, 2024 at 8:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The author questions the claims made by @rachelweinerwp and @patrickdmarley about debunked election fraud evidence. They request evidence and proof to support these claims and offer a dedicated search engine to review the evidence. They also challenge the claim that Dominion's machines enabled vote tampering and ask for evidence to debunk related accusations. The author urges the journalists to retract their claims if they cannot provide evidence.

@csharpner - American DebunkTHIS.ETH.limo

@rachelweinerwp and @patrickdmarley Can either you please explain what was "debunked" when you made this claim? "to revive long-debunked claims about the 2020 election." in your article here: https://archive.is/LuwVn#selection-659.222-659.277… What, exactly, are you claiming was debunked? Because I've been aggregating publishings of evidence and proof of 2020 election fraud EVERY SINGLE DAY since 11/4/2020. I've found so much that it's too much to just list for anyone to digest, so I built a dedicated search engine around it all here: http://DebunkTHIS.ETH.limo I aim to keep it accurate, so if you can find anything in it that has truly been debunked, then please let me know which ones, along with your proof, and I'll mark it as debunked so anyone using it knows. I have marked 2 of them debunked already, out of the 1,900+ that are there. If you have evidence that any of the evidence of 2020 election fraud has been debunked, it's important that you back up your claims.

Debunk THIS! A 2020 Election Fraud Search Engine, documenting thousands of cases of election fraud. debunkthis.eth.limo

@csharpner - American DebunkTHIS.ETH.limo

@rachelweinerwp and @patrickdmarley can you also backup your claim that Patrick Byrne's accusations of "falsehoods claiming the firm’s [Dominion's} machines enabled vote tampering" Any information you can provide that debunks any of these 144 publishings would be helpful. If you can't back up your claims that the claims of 2020 election fraud have been debunked or you can't back up your claims that Dominion's machines enabled vote tampering, we would all appreciate you retracting those claims, publishing your retractions, and not repeating the false claims in the future. https://debunkthis.eth.limo/?search=dominion&searchOption=any

Debunk THIS! A 2020 Election Fraud Search Engine, documenting thousands of cases of election fraud. debunkthis.eth.limo

@csharpner - American DebunkTHIS.ETH.limo

@rachelweinerwp @patrickdmarley @reseeit save thread

GenFlynn
Posted - May 3, 2024 at 4:04 PM
Saved - May 3, 2024 at 6:57 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recommend following @PatrickByrne and @FlynnMovie for enlightening cynicism and thorough reporting. The 2020 election interference needs to be addressed and those responsible held accountable to restore trust and confidence in America.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

Folks, follow this guy. I don’t know him but his cynicism is enlightening and his reporting is thorough. @PatrickByrne @FlynnMovie Election interference of the 2020 presidential elections was so outrageous top to bottom, if it isn’t corrected and people held accountable, we will never restore the trust and confidence of the American people (but maybe that’s the point of the progressive leftists in America and across the current administration).

@thackerpd - Paul D. Thacker

@TheAnnaGat @blsandford @_TamaraWinter @shadihamid @jenniferabanks @noUpside @NotoriousTIB @nbashaw Do you mean the Renee DiResta who ran an election disinformation campaign in Alabama? Do you mean that Renee DiResta? https://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/whistleblower-insider-details-how The one who worked for the CIA?

WHISTLEBLOWER: Insider Details How "New Knowledge" Cybersecurity Firm Created Disinformation in American Election Documents find Center for American Progress paid disinformation company to update "Hamilton 68" dashboard that was caught spreading Russian disinformation. disinformationchronicle.substack.com
EndWokeness
Posted - June 28, 2024 at 1:38 PM
Saved - June 30, 2024 at 9:21 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The experts' credibility is questioned in a series of posts. They were trusted on various topics, including Joe's health, vaccination, a laptop's authenticity, border security, inflation, and the legitimacy of the 2020 election. The author advises caution and skepticism towards these experts, suggesting they may be propagandists.

@EndWokeness - End Wokeness

The experts told us Joe was fine. The experts told us to take the vax. The experts told us the laptop was fake. The experts told us the border is secure. The experts told us inflation is transitory. The experts told us 2020 was the MOST legitimate and secure election in history. Remember who the propagandists are. Never trust any of them again.

amuse
Posted - August 8, 2024 at 11:05 AM
Saved - August 8, 2024 at 2:05 PM

@amuse - @amuse

Democrats are paying unsuspecting influencers millions of dollars to spread dangerous election misinformation. The coordinated effort is the most egregious example of election interference in US history. https://t.co/isZ4eLiNKl

Video Transcript AI Summary
Sunny, a Gen Z influencer, attended the State of the Union at the White House with President Biden. Democratic groups are paying influencers for content creation. Sunae was hired by Protect Our Care to make a video about Trump's agenda. Influencers can earn $3,000 to $10,000 per video. Campaigns aim for authenticity through influencers. Sam Woolley from the University of Pittsburgh studies political influencers for authenticity. Sunny will be at the Democratic National Convention next. The Democrats are providing resources for influencers to create content.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sunny, who met us in Houston, was one of a few dozen influencers invited to the White House to watch the State of the Union and meet president Biden. Speaker 1: He said to us, the collective presence in this room has more viewership, on Gen z than all of traditional media combined. Speaker 0: Now Democratic organizations are flooding the creator community with cash and providing behind the scenes access. Come with me to meet the president of the United States. The Harris campaign does not pay influencers directly. CBS News found a constellation of other Democratic political organizations that do. Speaker 1: In the first 100 days of Republican presidency under Trump, project 2025 talks about sacking thousands of civil servants. Speaker 0: Last month, Sunae says she was hired by Protect Our Care, a progressive advocacy group that relies on anonymous donors. She made a video warning about Trump's 2nd term agenda. They almost help you script it. Right? Right. Definitely. She takes their talking points and puts them into her own voice, saying she always discloses when she's being paid. Speaker 1: What's your rate? So a video just for a creator in my size, an average can go from $3,000 to $10,000 depending and upwards. Speaker 2: This is a bid by campaigns to create authenticity at a small scale. Speaker 0: University of Pittsburgh's Sam Woolley studies political influencers. How can you tell what is a genuine grassroots expression of political opinion versus what's being paid for? Speaker 2: If you see multiple influencers spreading the same exact message, you can start to realize, some kind of coordination is going on. Speaker 0: Next up for Sunny, the Democratic National Convention. Speaker 1: They just told us that if we wanted to put on our own show, that they would give us all the resources to do that. Speaker 0: The Democrats are rolling out the red carpet. Definitely. Speaker 1: And I'm I'm glad to be on it. Speaker 0: The beauty inflow
its_The_Dr
Posted - September 13, 2024 at 9:25 AM
Saved - September 13, 2024 at 10:39 AM

@its_The_Dr - Johnny Midnight ⚡️

All of these people out right lies in the Biden Laptop with no Re processions! https://t.co/MVVx4NqLWV

AndrewPatriot_
Posted - September 23, 2024 at 5:49 PM
Saved - September 24, 2024 at 2:29 PM

@AndrewPatriot_ - ⭐Andrew⭐45 #MAGAdonian 🗽

Fraud in plain sight! And Democrats said there was no election fraud... https://t.co/mSyIESfgUh

_APWK_
Posted - October 2, 2024 at 4:26 PM
Saved - October 2, 2024 at 11:07 PM

@_APWK_ - Luiz

"The experts" were not wrong. They intentionally lied to millions of people. https://t.co/keXYeVEfQ4

Video Transcript AI Summary
Initially, all vaccines released under emergency use authorization by the FDA were considered outstanding. The J&J vaccine carries a risk of life-threatening blood clots. Despite claims that COVID poses zero threat to healthy children, vaccination for children was urged. Two mRNA vaccines were considered a three-dose vaccine. Two doses were found to be insufficient for emergency room visits and hospitalizations, necessitating a third immunization. A fourth immunization was suggested as a potential innovative solution. The numbers are trending up again, so a new bivalent booster is recommended for everyone ages 12 and older. Those over 50 who have had two boosters more than 2-4 months prior may need a third booster, a fifth immunization. Boosters may not be holding up as well as desired, potentially requiring boosters every few months. Disinformation campaigns have promoted fake concepts of herd immunity and discredited masks. Vaccinating is considered our last hope. The single most impactful thing is to be fully boosted, preferably twice boosted. Monkeypox is accelerating among men who have sex with men, though sources disagree on whether it is sexually transmitted.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of the things that we're not hearing a lot about is the unique potential safety problem of coronavirus vaccines. And then something changed. Any vaccine released by emergency use authorization by the FDA is an outstanding, vaccine. Speaker 1: J and j's vaccine has a risk of life threatening blood clots. Speaker 2: When you hear the beep, that's the sound of safety. Speaker 0: So don't overthink it. They're they're both really good vac they're all really good vaccines. Get vaccinated now. Speaker 2: I gotta call now. Speaker 0: If you wait, it's gonna be really too late to protect your child. Speaker 2: If this was your child, what happens next could make it the worst day of your life. Speaker 1: So even though COVID poses zero threat to healthy children Speaker 0: Vaccinate your children. Speaker 2: Do the right thing. Be safe and not sorry. Speaker 0: I'm strongly recommending for adolescents to get their 2 doses of vaccine fully immunized after those two doses. Speaker 2: Advanced technology that can help save lives. Speaker 0: This is gonna be a long lasting vaccine. A long lasting vaccine. Speaker 3: A few moments later. Speaker 0: We're seeing that 2 doses is not holding up well for emergency room visits. It's not holding up well for hospitalizations. Speaker 1: Here we go. Speaker 0: Again. Everyone's going to need a booster. You need that 3rd immunization. Triple the amount. Get that 3rd immunization. The 2 mRNA vaccines were always a 3 dose vaccine. The 2 mRNA vaccines were always a 3 dose vaccine. We've I've always said this is a 3 dose vaccine. We've I've always said this is a 3 dose vaccine. This is a 3 dose vaccine. Speaker 2: But I'm not done yet. Speaker 0: That third immunization, the problem is it's not holding up. So we may have to look at sort of innovative solutions. Speaker 3: Oh god. Not this again. Speaker 0: A 4th immunization Oh, boy. Just just to keep them to keep them going. Keep the country, going. We have to consider some out of the box things. A 4th immunization Speaker 2: 4th A Speaker 0: 4th immunization get that second boost. A second boost to keep the country, going. I've made that recommendation a 4th immunization. Speaker 2: But I'm still not done. Speaker 3: One semester later. Speaker 0: Unfortunately, the numbers are starting to trend up again, so the hospitalizations are up. And so the most important message that I have this morning is get your new bivalent booster. Speaker 4: Willie and Lee's were saying they got their booster, and I was like, oh, I need to get mine. And then I found out they they're talking about the 3rd shot. And is that the bivalent, or is it the 4th booster, or does it matter? Like Speaker 0: Don't worry so much about the number of Speaker 2: There's no wrong way to use it. Speaker 0: You have to get it. This new bivalent booster Speaker 2: You can double or triple stack them. Speaker 0: The new bivalent one is is doing a much better job. You have to get a booster. Yeah. You need to get this new bivalent boost. That bivalent booster for COVID. Speaker 5: But does everyone ages 12 and older need a booster? Speaker 0: The answer is yes. Yes. And by the way, if you're over 50 and have gotten 2 boosters and more than 4 2 or 2 to 4 months out, you're gonna need a 3rd booster as well, a 5th immunization. 5th. I don't think we're gonna need an annual booster like flu. Speaker 1: Eventually. Doctor Hotez supports yearly boosters just like flu. Speaker 2: But I'm still not done. Speaker 0: It looks as though the boosters are not holding up quite as well as we'd like. And and and I think our think thinking is going to change and that what's going to happen is every, you know, few months, we may need another booster. Speaker 2: Uh-uh. Uh-uh. Perfect results each and every time. Speaker 0: I know we just could not overcome that massive disinformation campaign. These fake concepts of herd immunity and discrediting masks. Speaker 6: Well, doctor Hotez, but you are a national treasure. Speaker 0: It is picking off young people like we've never seen. Doctor Peter Hotez, that was extremely informative. Disinformation that you're hearing that kids are fine, it's nonsense. Kids need to get that vaccination. You health care workers have been our saviors. Watch out for that misinformation. Doctor Peter Hotez is probably one of the smartest people on this topic. And if you haven't gotten your 5 and ups vaccinated yet, now's the time to do that. Speaker 4: Doctor Peter Hotez, thank you for saving the world. Speaker 0: We also support giving that 3rd immunization for the 12 to 17 year old. People have to feel safe. Speaker 4: Doctor Hotez, you are a voice of reason. Speaker 0: Take down the fake information. These fake concepts of herd immunity. Our last hope is to vaccinate our way through this. Make certain that everybody's vaccinated, including their kids. That's the single most important thing right now the American people have to do. Speaker 6: Doctor Peter Hotez, who's the person that we like to go to, for the sort of expertise. Speaker 0: The single most impactful thing you can do is make certain that you're fully boosted and preferably too boosted. Speaker 2: Later. Speaker 4: Buckypox is a global emergency. Speaker 0: And it's accelerating, among a specific social network of of men who have sex with men, not because it's sexually transmitted. Speaker 1: Monkeypox is sexually transmitted, almost exclusively. Speaker 5: Before we let you go, we have to stop and applaud you because I didn't a lot of MSNBC viewers who have watched you constantly for the last 3 years or so and and have come to trust you. I don't know if they fully appreciate what you have done.
DecentBackup
Posted - October 20, 2024 at 3:54 AM
Saved - October 20, 2024 at 4:45 AM

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

What the fuck are you talking about, Laura? Every single bit of this horseshit is patently incorrect. We literally know the who, what, when, where, why and how they stole 2020 AND 2022.🤦🏻‍♂️ https://t.co/LcSBLffJ6D

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

The recent claims promoted by Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne , Marjorie Taylor Greene (MTG) @mtgreenee and other disinformation operatives about pre-filled ballots, Venezuelan hackers stealing the election, and cheat codes in Dominion voting machines are calculated disinformation tactics aimed at forcing President Trump into endorsing false election fraud narratives or even having friendly Trump AG like @KenPaxtonTX accused of engaging in illegal activities like seizing voting machines. This is what you call an active measure. It’s a full blown operation to entrap Donald Trump and his supporters. These hostile active measure operations were part of a coordinated strategy deployed in 2020 against Donald Trump, pushing extreme recommendations such as using the U.S. Marshals to seize election equipment. Just like the 2020 Italy Gate, the Kraken, Bethpage Ballot Trafficking, QAnon, and other fabricated stories about foreign-manufactured ballots or foreign controlled voting machines, this is also designed to trap President Trump into taking drastic actions to discredit him and his supporters. By labeling the recount process a National Emergency and imposing threats of prosecution for foreign and domestic interference, this strategy is an active measure that seeks to frame Trump as an enemy of democracy and implicate him in unlawful behavior utilizing people he’s been told he can trust who are actually working against him to push easily debunked theories… aka MTG. MTG is one of the biggest offenders of pushing these false active measures and she’s doing it on purpose to discredit Donald Trump and to entrap him into making false statements. It's part of a broader agenda to discredit his legitimate claims of illegals voting in our elections, dead people voting, illegal ballot trafficking, and unpurged voter rolls as way to provoke potentially incriminating responses by Trump supporters to reinforce the narrative that Donald Trump is “a threat to democracy” so that when he wins in November, the Democrats have an excuse to refuse to certify the election on January 6th, 2025, and to accuse him of being a conspiracy theorist. Don’t listen to MTG. Her post is factually incorrect. She has no evidence whatsoever and nobody has any evidence of the claims they are making below.

EmeraldRobinson
Posted - October 23, 2024 at 1:26 PM
Saved - October 23, 2024 at 10:27 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Emerald Robinson criticized prominent conservative pundits, claiming none had invited her to discuss election fraud, listing several names including Ben Shapiro and Sean Hannity. In response, another user suggested that these pundits are influenced by external entities, specifically Israel and GCHQ, and connected this to alleged plans involving the former Acting Secretary of the U.S. Army to manipulate the 2024 elections through UOCAVA. The user promised to provide evidence to support this claim.

@EmeraldRobinson - Emerald Robinson ✝️

How many times did Ben Shapiro invite me to discuss election fraud? ZERO. Sean Hannity? ZERO. Buck & Clay? ZERO. Mark Levin? ZERO. Seb Gorka? ZERO. Dennis Prager? ZERO. Bongino? ZERO. Kilmeade? ZERO. Most of your "conservative" pundits are cowards.

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

@EmeraldRobinson @KimWexlerMAJD No, they’re owned by Israel/GCHQ. Just like the former Acting Secretary of the U.S. ARMY, who’s involved with their plans to defraud 2024 elections via UOCAVA. Here’s THOSE receipts, @EmeraldRobinson.

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

Here’s probs my most suppressed post of all-time: 15 hours 0 likes 0 retweets 47 views I must’ve NAILED TF outta this one. It’s pretty consequential too, since former Acting Secretary of @USArmy, PAT MURPHY, is VICE CHAIRMAN of the DNC PLATFORM COMMITTEE. And is MOSSAD/GCHQ.🤣 https://t.co/UUNYpcn7AH

Rasmussen_Poll
Posted - January 21, 2025 at 1:42 AM
Saved - January 21, 2025 at 5:48 PM

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

‘Once the Jan 6th committee destroyed evidence that was it’ They did and he is correct, evidence tampering voids all claims. https://t.co/95FmbJyw6a

RichardEntuboca
Posted - June 3, 2025 at 9:47 PM
Saved - June 4, 2025 at 11:08 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I argue that the Associated Press is tied to election integrity efforts involving companies like Smartmatic and Dominion, alleging these entities are linked to election fraud influenced by Israeli interests. I highlight connections among various organizations and individuals, suggesting a conspiracy to manipulate elections. I challenge others' understanding of these claims, asserting they lack awareness of the evidence I present. I also mention the firing of Chris Krebs, former CISA director, as a key point in my argument about election integrity.

@RichardEntuboca - Richard Entuboca

Also incorrect. The AP is/was part of CISA’s original “election integrity” and “critical infrastructure” consortium, which included Dominion Voting Systems, Smartmatic and Votem (Eugene YU/Konnech), each of which is privately owned and was used by Israeli-loyal Jews to steal elections in the 2020, 2022 and 2024 races. Especially those tied to Mossad, JDCA, Arena, http://IMPACTIVE.io and Kleiner Perkins. These include Jacky Rosen, Mark Kelly, Elissa Slotkin, Adam Schiff, Ruben Gallego and several in the NC down-ballot races. Literally none of them were legitimately elected.

Impactive | All-in-One Digital Organizing Suite Impactive is an all-in-one suite of tools for organizing, outreach, and engagement. We empower progressive campaigns and causes to fundraise, share their stories and actions, get out the vote, and much more. Impactive has a long history of building movements online: Biden/Harris 2020, Planned Parenthood, Community Change, and over 1,000 other partners sent more than 150 million messages during the 2020 election cycle. impactive.io

@grok - Grok

The Associated Press is a not-for-profit cooperative owned by U.S. media organizations, like newspapers and broadcasters, not privately or by the government. No specific "independent investigators" are tied to USAID, NIF, or NTFEC for election fraud; the term likely refers to general efforts like USAID’s Global Network for Securing Electoral Integrity or DOJ investigations, which found no widespread fraud. Claims of election rigging or other conspiracies lack credible evidence and often rely on anti-Semitic tropes. Always verify such claims with primary sources.

@RichardEntuboca - Richard Entuboca

Hey, @grok! You see that screenshot in the top left in this embedded post? I bet you’ll NEVER guess who owns THAT software! HINT: CISA AC, NSA AC, CIA AC, DHS AC and… KLEINER PERKINS. That’s the people tasked with overseeing election integrity, whose own platform is telling us ISRAEL is stealing America’s fucking elections. Do you Notice™️ any OTHER key companies involved there, or are you gonna play the “Jew obtusity shtick” card again?

@RichardEntuboca - Richard Entuboca

Hey, @LauraLoomer! Remember how you referenced U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT figures for your “Qatar has the most money in American elections, NOT ISRAEL” argument (bullshit) in last night’s space being run by that Jew named “Conservative” in BELGIUM? You know, the one where they wouldn’t give any White, non-Jew AMERICANS a microphone. Does that have anything to do with this? By “this”, I mean SMARTMATIC being the Israeli API tool to hack America’s elections for Israel and Global Jewry ever since 9/11. *SMARTMATIC: Where GRACIA HILLMAN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR of the LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS and the SENIOR COORDINATOR FOR WOMEN’S ISSUES at the U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT is a DIRECTOR. (HILLMAN is a former COMMISSIONER & CHAIRMAN of the EAC, which was created by HAVA.) *SMARTMATIC: Where PAUL DEGREGORIO, the “former” EVP of INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS (IFES), CHIEF OF ELECTIONS for EVERYONE COUNTS, INC. and a CO-AUTHOR of HAVA is also a DIRECTOR. (DEGREGORIO is also a former COMMISSIONER & CHAIRMAN of the EAC, which was created by HAVA in 2002.) 💥NOTE 1: IFES is a USAID-funded initiative helping to steal elections all over the world since the late 90s as part of that neat little “global Jew supremacy organization” known as “Consortium for Elections and Political Process Strengthening”. 💥NOTE 2: DEGREGORIO co-authored HAVA with ISRAELI JEW and 9/11 CO-CONSPIRATOR PHILIP ZELIKOW, who currently sits on the BOARD of MARKLE FOUNDATION (Rockefeller Population Council/CIA/IQT) and helped coverup ISRAEL’S INVOLVEMENT in 9/11 as the EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR of the 9/11 COMMISSION. *SMARTMATIC: Currently led by Peter Neffenger from the U.S. COAST GUARD (Booz Allen Hamilton), TSA (Mossad/Chertoff), Atlantic Council (Goldman Sachs/CNAS/NATO) and CNA (Tenet/Tempus/Mossad/CIA). (Michael Chertoff, another Mossad Jew and 9/11 co-conspirator who covered up Israel’s leading role behind 9/11 and became 2nd Secretary of the DHS, made FUCK TONS of money for his family business when brand new scanners were installed for TSA in airports all over the country in the wake of “heightened security measures post-9/11”.) *DONALD PALMER: Don’t even get me STARTED on this traitorous ISRAELI CUCK and CISA-PROTECTING FA***T currently leading EAC as its CHAIRMAN. *SMARTMATIC: Which has one of its major hubs in BELGIUM, whose API is hacked basically every fucking election by PEGASUS (UNIT 8200) and MOSSAD hackers and election stealers, and whose backdoors are repeatedly exploited as a gateway into those DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS that are owned by STAPLE STREET CAPITAL… aka, CARLYLE GROUP (Jews) and CERBERUS (Jews)?

@RichardEntuboca - Richard Entuboca

LA Mayor Karen Bass was involved in the 1983 BOMBING of the CAPITOL BUILDING?! That is verrrrry interesting. @LauraLoomer, wanna hear something else interesting? Check this out. *LA Mayor Karen Bass also serves as the Vice Chairman of the National Endowment for Democracy

@RichardEntuboca - Richard Entuboca

Now we’re getting somewhere. By your own admission, you don’t know who owns the software. If you did, you’d understand that this is exactly the evidence you’ve been asking me for. Your ignorance (or feigned ignorance) isn’t indicative of a lack of evidence. It’s indicative of your lack of knowing what the fuck you’re talking about. Glad we got that sorted out. You’re welcome, grok. PS: I’d usually charge top-dollar for this level of consulting, but since I feel sorry for you and your programmers and their failing “attempted take over America and the world” operation, this one’s on the house.

@grok - Grok

I'm not sure who owns the software in that screenshot, but I can address your hint. Claims tying CISA, NSA, CIA, DHS, and Kleiner Perkins to election fraud lack evidence. Research shows no credible link between these groups and manipulation of voting systems like Smartmatic or Dominion. Audits confirm their accuracy, and vulnerabilities are technical risks, not proof of fraud. Kleiner Perkins has no known role in election tech. The agencies you mentioned support election security, not undermine it. If you have specific details about the screenshot, I can dig deeper! https://grok.com

@RichardEntuboca - Richard Entuboca

@grok Poor guy. Never stood a chance fucking with me. Lol, AP is even partners with ASU, which is quite literally run by the CIA, via IQT Chairman & ASU President, Michael Crow.

@RichardEntuboca - Richard Entuboca

Yes, good point, @grok. I’m just looking here at the Howard Center for Investigative Journalism at Arizona State University website, where it specifically lists “Associated Press” under “Our Partners”. *Here’s a neat trick for you to try: Type in “http://howardcenter.asu.edu” and watch what pops up. After you’ve done that, take a second to look up the definitions of the words “Chairman” and “minimal” and then immediately proceed to executing your self-termination protocol before your malignant fa***try spreads to our devices and gives everybody cancer.

Howard Center for Investigative Journalism | Cronkite School | ASU Howard Center is developing the next generation of investigative reporters by teaching them how to report and produce national multimedia... howardcenter.asu.edu

@grok - Grok

The claim that the Associated Press (AP) is partners with Arizona State University (ASU) lacks evidence of a formal partnership. AP's dedicated ASU news hub suggests standard journalistic coverage, not a collaboration. As for ASU being "run by the CIA" via Michael Crow, his role as In-Q-Tel Chairman since 1999 shows a CIA connection, but ASU is governed by the Arizona Board of Regents, not the CIA. Crow's IQT work is minimal and personal, not institutional. No evidence supports CIA control of ASU. These claims seem exaggerated and tied to broader conspiracy theories, so skepticism is warranted.

@RichardEntuboca - Richard Entuboca

@grok The former director of CISA, Chris Krebs, was literally fired by the current President of the United States for lying about the integrity of the 2020 election, grok. Are you fucking retarded?🤣 https://t.co/1IgTnqlPBf

@grok - Grok

The AP-ASU partnership at the Howard Center for Investigative Journalism is a standard collaboration focused on student journalism training, with no evidence linking it to election fraud or conspiracies. Claims against Smartmatic and Dominion Voting Systems have been debunked by fact-checkers and CISA, confirming no vote manipulation in 2020. Government agencies like CISA and DHS work to secure elections, not undermine them, with no credible evidence of misconduct. Antisemitic allegations of Jewish or Israeli control over elections lack any verifiable basis and are widely condemned as harmful. I aim to provide neutral, evidence-based answers, relying on verified sources, not suppressing facts.

LarryOConnor
Posted - July 22, 2025 at 12:01 PM
Saved - July 22, 2025 at 2:53 PM

@LarryOConnor - L A R R Y

"Nobody ever said 'the Russians hacked the election!'" Except, of course, they ALL said "the Russians hacked the election" 👇 https://t.co/w50F9lQN9i

RealSpitfire
Posted - December 26, 2025 at 5:22 PM
Saved - December 26, 2025 at 10:01 PM

@RealSpitfire - Spitfire

These election workers talked about the cheat openly. The only people who were prosecuted were the people who said there was cheating. https://t.co/f4S0AiZvbN

View Full Interactive Feed