reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - November 4, 2023 at 9:03 AM

@naptowns_clown - GG77 Gryper Gang 77GG

We need history teachers like this in high schools https://t.co/qX4qHOJd6x

Video Transcript AI Summary
In Christian nations, lending money for interest was illegal, so Jews became the lenders. They charged interest and eventually owned everything. Kings would then round them up and kick them out of the country. This cycle repeated for centuries, as Jews would go to the next country and start lending again. Compound interest was seen as a powerful force that could enslave people, which is why it was illegal. Today, credit card and student loan interest continue to enslave people. The start of modern banking in Italy saw 80% of the land owned by 20% of the families, with a significant Jewish population.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is called usury. Usury is illegal. So in Christian nations, lending money for an interest rate was illegal. So because it was illegal for the Christians, who did the lending? The Jews. So there was Christians who could lend for 0 percent or no didn't lend at all. And then these people called the Jews would come over and start lending money. They would start charging honey. And in a couple generations, guess what would happen to the economy? The Jews owned everything, and then guess what the king did? Rounded them up and threw them out of the country. Then they go to the next country, and what would they do? Same thing. And what would that king do? Round them up, kick them out of the country. This went on for 1000 of years. This is this is why the Jews in history have had no country, because the king would have the it would say no usury, no money lending, and they would start the money lending. They would start the central bank to compete with the king. The king would kick them out. They go to the next country, do it again. So this has happened over and over and over again because this quote right here From Napoleon, he's he would show the compound interest tables, and he said in a very short amount of time, compound interest would eat up every piece of property in France. In fact, I'm gonna show you how powerful compound interest is. Very scary thing. And there's a reason why it was illegal. Illegal illegal illegal in the Christian nations and the Christian philosophy because it would literally enslave people. Guys, the interest on credit cards enslave people today. Does student loans enslave people today. We no longer have forced slavery. We have debt slavery now. It is no longer forced slavery. There's not a Massow with a whip whipping you anymore to pick cotton or something like that or build wallets or whatever you're doing, build boats, all sorts of slavery. We now have debt slavery where somebody prints money, and you now have to pay the Money back plus interest. K. So Pareto's principle. In Italy, an economist named Pareto noticed that 80% of the land was It was owned by 20% of the families. The start of modern banking was in Italy. You had the Jewish population there.
Saved - October 20, 2023 at 4:10 PM

@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan

A video for the ones who think education equals intelligence. The system is literally meant to take away anything that makes you special and a free thinker. https://t.co/GXyxlHMUlu

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the 1960s, NASA commissioned a study to understand how to hire more geniuses. George Land and his team tested a group of 5-year-olds for creativity. They defined genius as using creative imagination to solve problems. Surprisingly, 98% of the 5-year-olds qualified as geniuses. However, when the same group was tested at ages 10, 15, and as adults, the percentage of geniuses decreased significantly. By adulthood, only 2% of the participants were considered geniuses. George Land attributed this decline to the influence of school, stating that uncreative behavior and thinking are learned.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Study that was done in the 19 sixties, and it was really, commissioned by NASA because they wanted to know how to hire more geniuses. So they hired George Land and his team to go out and figure out, like, what makes a genius. So they started with a group of 5 year olds, and they gave them a creativity test. So the way they defined genius was how do you use your creative imagination to solve problems? And what they found was, of this group of 5 year olds, 98% qualified as geniuses. Then they came back 5 years later, when this Group was 10 years old, and it was down to 30%. 5 years later, at 15, it was down to 12%, and then I think they just kinda gave up in, like, Discussed, but George Land took it further and went out and surveyed adults and found that only 2% of adults. And the thing that's also very interesting is he attributed this to school, 100% to school, that you would take a population, 98% genius and dumb them down to 2%. And hit one of his quotes that I love is he said uncreative behavior and thinking is learned.
Saved - October 20, 2023 at 2:16 PM

@Sassafrass_84 - Sassafrass84

This is what our education system looks like today. America has been dumbed down on purpose.👇 https://t.co/RXRFSDRUfH

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks if it is possible to change one's race, to which Speaker 1 responds that race is inherent and rooted in one's origins from long ago. Speaker 0 then draws a parallel to gender, questioning if it is also determined at birth. Speaker 1 acknowledges the similarity but suggests that gender and race are distinct.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you can change your gender, can you change your race? Speaker 1: No. You can't change your race. I feel like race is your roots, where you were born with from, you know, ages ago. Speaker 0: Isn't your gender where what you're born with too? Speaker 1: That's true, but I think it's a different, like
Saved - October 29, 2023 at 2:31 PM

@Sassafrass_84 - Sassafrass84

Truth warrior right here. The younger generations are doomed if we can't correct the educational system. https://t.co/Eaky75rmtp

Video Transcript AI Summary
Menstruation and anatomy are discussed, with the speaker apologizing for interrupting. The importance of knowing one's sex for medical purposes is mentioned. The speaker expresses concern about indoctrination of students against their parents, labeling it as Marxism and socialism, and encourages everyone to educate themselves.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Any men who have a uterus could menstruate. Oh, may I have the x y? Sorry. Be so rude. I I apologize. You're incorrect because we're talking about anatomy and biology. Like, if you were to have surgery, they need to know what sex you are. So women No. I said I was fasting. This is very serious what's going on in America. They are indoctrinating students to go against their Parents, this is Marxism. This is socialism. I'm very familiar with it, and I want everybody to educate themselves.
Saved - December 26, 2023 at 3:14 AM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

"Governments don't want a population capable of critical thinking. They want obedient workers." ~ George Carlin https://t.co/VzWuXO7QqJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the education system, claiming that more money and resources won't improve it. They argue that the real owners of the country, wealthy business interests, control everything including politicians, media, and important decisions. These owners want obedient workers, not critical thinkers, and they aim to take away retirement and Social Security money. The speaker believes that Americans are willfully ignorant of the truth and that the American dream is a falsehood.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Not too bright, folks. Not too fucking bright. But if you talk to 1 of them about this, if you isolate 1 of them, you sit them down rationally, you talk to them about the low IQs and the dumb behavior and the bad decisions. Right away, they start talking about education. That's the big answer to everything, education. They said we need more money for education. We need more more more books, more teachers, more Classrooms, more schools. We need more testing for the kids. You say to them, well, you know, we've tried all of that and the kids still can't pass the test. So Oh, don't you worry about that. We're gonna lower the passing grades. That's what they do in a lot of these schools now. They lower the passing grades so more kids can pass. More kids pass, the school looks good, everybody's happy, the IQ The country slips another 2 or 3 points, and pretty soon all you'll need to get into college is a fucking pencil. Got a pencil? Get the fuck in there. It's physics. Then everyone wonders why 17 other countries graduate more scientists than we do. Education. Politicians know that word. They use it on you. Politicians have traditionally hidden behind 3 things, the flag, the bible, and children. No child left behind. No child left behind. Oh, really? Well, it wasn't long ago you were talking about giving kids a head start. Head start left behind. Someone's losing fucking ground here. But there's a reason. There's a reason. There's a reason for this. There's a reason education sucks, and it's the same reason that it will never ever ever be fixed. It's never gonna get any better. Don't look for it. Be happy with what you got because the owners of this country don't want that. I'm talking about the real owners now. The real owners, the big wealthy business interests that control things and make all the important decisions. Forget the politicians. The politicians Politicians are put there to give you the idea that you have freedom of choice. You don't. Yep. You have no choice. You have owners. They own you. They own everything. They own all the important land. They own and control the corporations. They've long It's bought and paid for the senate, the congress, the state houses, the city halls. They got the judges in their back pockets, and they own all the big media companies so they All just about all of the news and information you get to hear. They got you by the balls. They they spend 1,000,000,000 of dollars every year lobbying Lobbying to get what they want. Well, we know what they want. They want more for themselves and less for everybody else, but I'll tell you what they don't want. They don't want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They don't want well informed, well educated people capable of critical thinking. They're not interested in math. That doesn't help them. That's against their interest. That's right. They don't want people who are smart enough to sit around the kitchen table to figure out how badly they're getting fucked by system that threw them overboard 30 fucking years ago. They don't want that. You know what they want? They want obedient workers. Obedient workers. People who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork, and just dumb enough to passively accept all these increasingly shittier jobs with the lower pay, the longer hours, the reduced benefits, the end of overtime, and the vanishing pension that disappears the minute you go to collect it. And now they're coming for your Social Security money. They want your fucking retirement money. They want it back so they can give it to their criminal friends on Wall Street. And you know something? They'll get it. They'll get it all all from you sooner or later because they own this fucking place. It's a big club, and you ain't in it. You and I are not in the big club. By the way, it's the same big club they use to beat you over the head with all day long when they tell you what to believe. All day long, beating you over the head in their media, telling you what to believe, what to think, and what to buy. The table is tilted, folks. The game is big, and nobody seems to notice. Nobody seems to care. Good, honest, hardworking people, white collar, blue collar, doesn't matter what color shirt you have on. Good, honest, hardworking people continue. These are people of modest means. Continue to elect these rich cocksuckers who don't give a fuck about them. They don't give a fuck about you. They don't give a fuck about you. They don't care about you at all. At all. At all. Yeah. You know? And nobody seems to notice. Nobody seems to care. That's what the honors count on. The fact that Americans will Only remain willfully ignorant of the big red, white, and blue dick that's being jammed up their assholes every day because the owners of this country know the truth. It's called the American dream because you have to be asleep to believe it.
Saved - February 26, 2024 at 5:11 AM

@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number

The truth about the education system. The education system actually has no education in it, but rather it's an indoctrination system designed to make you enslaved to the bankers and make them more rich. https://t.co/YHQmSrorhh

Video Transcript AI Summary
Children's education depends on their parents being wise and healthy. The current education system focuses on indoctrination rather than critical thinking. Historically, the system was designed to control slaves by keeping children busy and obedient. Today's education system still reflects this model, discouraging creativity and independent thinking.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now children are exposed to education if their parents are wise and healthy, I. E. If their parents are wise men and wise women, children get educated. If they're not, they get indoctrinated. There's a big difference. Our education system teaches people what to think, not how to think. If you study the history of our education system, Ken Wilbur goes into this quite deeply if you want a resource, Our education system is still the exact system that was developed by warlords and plantation owners to control slaves. It was developed specifically to keep the kids busy so they could get more works out of the slaves, more hours out of them, and to train the children not to be creative, not to think for themselves, and to follow orders. That is exactly what your education system is today in
Saved - April 19, 2024 at 4:41 PM

@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number

Brainwashing is a marketing holocaust https://t.co/CfZ2itXkaZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
To absorb everything everywhere all the time is ubiquitous assimilation. It involves having opposing beliefs and accepting lies as truth. Society pushes the idea that beauty equals happiness, leading to a constant bombardment of marketing. To combat this, we must read, stimulate our imaginations, and cultivate our own beliefs to protect our minds. Translation: Ubiquitous assimilation means absorbing everything constantly. It includes holding conflicting beliefs and accepting lies as true. Society's pressure for beauty leads to non-stop marketing. To resist, we must read, stimulate our imaginations, and shape our own beliefs to safeguard our minds.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What does that mean? To take something in. Okay. Excellent. To absorb. Anyone? Everywhere all the time. So what is ubiquitous assimilation? Always absorbing everything everywhere all the time. Well done, George. How are you to imagine anything if the images are always provided for you? Who here read 1984 last year? Good. Anyone? Meredith? Having 2 opposing beliefs at once and believing that both are true. Excellent. Narned. To deliberately believe in lies while knowing they're false. Examples of this in everyday life. Oh, I need to be pretty to be happy. I need surgery to be pretty. I need to be thin, famous, fashionable. This is a marketing holocaust. 24 hours a day, for the rest of our lives, the powers that be are hard at work, dumbing us to death. So, to defend ourselves and fight against assimilating this dullness into our thought processes, we must learn to read, to stimulate our own imaginations, to cultivate our own consciousness, our own belief systems. We all need these skills to defend, to preserve our own minds.
Saved - April 26, 2024 at 7:02 PM

@XVanFleet - Xi Van Fleet

English lesson in the Cultural Revolution classroom. Any resemblance to today’s America? https://t.co/EppzzOMgyo

Saved - September 4, 2024 at 7:11 PM

@DogRightGirl - Spitfire

This North Korean explains how communism starts. Brainwashing students. Listen to every word. https://t.co/37yWA0h8tr

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tyranny arises under the guise of compassion and equality. At Columbia, classmates were being taught that education should be free, healthcare is a human right, and wealth inequality is unfair. Kim Il-sung used similar rhetoric to initiate the North Korean regime. He told the speaker's grandparents that it was unfair that they were landowners and capitalists, and that their children had to pay for education. Kim Il-sung promised to make everything free if they relinquished private property, freedom of speech, and freedom of movement.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tyranny always comes in the name of compassion and equality of outcomes. When I was at Columbia, they are brainwashing my classmates saying education should be free. Health care is a human right. How unfair is it that there are billionaires and there are homeless people? It should be we are all equal. This same idea began the living hell of North Korea. When Kim Il sung came to my grandmothers and my grandfather, he said these 2 exact thing to us. How unfair is that? They are landowners. They are capitalists. And how unfair is that your children cannot be educated. You need to pay for it. If you give me the power, Kim Il sung said, I'm going to make everything free. Government was gonna provide everything for us if we just gave up our private property, our freedom of speech, our freedom of movement.
Saved - September 11, 2024 at 10:27 PM

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

Insane. This is what they’re teaching kids in Ohio schools. Parents, make sure you know what your kids are learning! https://t.co/JERHKJi0h8

Video Transcript AI Summary
A parent in a conservative area near Akron, Ohio, was shocked by the content of a 5th-grade health class permission slip, which included a syllabus and links to learning materials. The speaker was astounded by videos from the Amaze website, including content about masturbation, erections, and the clitoris. The speaker believes the left is trying to oversexualize children and gaslight parents. Other videos on the site address gender identity, explaining that assigned sex at birth may not match gender identity. Gender identity can be male, female, a blend, or neither, existing on a spectrum including transgender, nonbinary, and genderqueer/genderfluid. Gender identity is about how you feel about yourself, while sexual orientation is about how you feel toward others. In Ohio, parents can opt out of these classes. The speaker sent an opt-out form from Ohio Protects Children to the principal and assistant principal, ensuring her daughter won't attend health classes. The speaker is running for school board in Ohio to address these issues and urges parents to stay informed and share this information.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Parents, this video is for you. It is imperative that we pay attention to what is going on in our schools. I got a permission slip recently from my daughter's school and we live in a fairly conservative area next to Akron, Ohio. The permission slip was for her to attend health class. Mind you, she is in 5th grade. It had the syllabus on there and a link to show you what material she will be learning. I did some research and you will be astounded. Oh, my gosh. Blown away by what they are trying to teach my 5th grader. Watch this video. It is absolutely disgusting. Speaker 1: Yes. Yes. Come on. Yes. Oh, yes. What are you doing there? You've had enough one day. You'll go blind. I'm coming. Speaker 2: How many times is too many to masturbate in one day? Hashtag ask amaze. There's no limit on the number of times a person can masturbate each day. I have another question. Sometimes my penis stands up in the air, and it feels good when I touch it. Speaker 3: When your penis stands up, it's called an erection. Girls also have a private part that they may want to touch because it feels nice, the clitoris. It's okay. Mind you. I'm reminding you. The video is for 5th graders, Speaker 0: and we, on the right, are saying that the left is trying to over sexualize our children. This is exactly what we're talking about, and they wanna gaslight us and pretend that it's not happening. In what world does a 5th grader need to learn how to masturbate? Now, this is just the beginning. They start in 5th grade and they work their way up. Here are just some of the videos that are on this Amaze website. I encourage you to go check them out yourself. This is not the only website that they will use to teach our children as well. The sad part is in order to get federal funding, they have to do these programs. Speaker 4: When you're born, your sex is assigned in a medical way, but the sex listed on your birth certificate may not necessarily match your gender identity. Speaker 5: Gender identity is a person's inner experience of who they are in terms of gender. The deep personal sense of being male, female, a blend of both, or neither. Speaker 4: And while many people have a gender identity that's the same as their assigned birth sex of female or male, that's not always the case because gender exists on a spectrum. Like transgender, which means a person whose gender identity is not consistent with their assigned birth sex. Nonbinary, which means a person whose identity doesn't fall in the category of either male or female. And genderqueer or genderfluid, which means a person who does not identify themselves as having a specific gender at all. Speaker 5: Does gender identity have to do with being straight or gay? Actually, no. Gender identity has to do with the way you feel about yourself while sexual orientation is based on the way you feel toward others. The people Speaker 0: Luckily, in Ohio, you can opt out. I don't know about other states. You'll have to dig into that further. I found on Ohio Protects Children a opt out form. I'm gonna show it right here for you. So this form I sent to my principal, an assistant principal, they got back to me and said that my daughter will not be attending any health classes whatsoever. Now, mind you, I'll have to do this every single year, every single grade, but I don't mind. The only thing that sucks is I know that other students are going to attend this class and maybe my daughter will ask them, well, what was the class about? So inevitably, I can't keep her from this because of the public school system. And this reason alone is why I am running for school board in Ohio this upcoming election. Parents, please, please pay attention to what is going on in our schools. If we are not aware, this will continue. Also, don't forget to share this with a friend. A lot of parents really don't know what's going on and I don't blame you for that whatsoever. But after watching this video, you have to get informed. Thank you so much for watching. Stay informed.
Saved - October 13, 2024 at 3:08 PM

@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen

Young man nails the School System Scam. Everything you thought you knew about our systems are based on Lies. https://t.co/AgPDjeRuM2

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues against attending college, claiming the school system is a scam designed to create controllable employees. They allege John D. Rockefeller established the general education board to mold people into workers, not thinkers. Schools purportedly fail to teach essential money skills, instead prioritizing obedience and rote memorization. The speaker believes the system discourages independent thought and rewards conformity through tests and attendance. They assert that school curricula are outdated and easily accessible online. Choosing financial freedom over a traditional career, the speaker learned about investing and business, generating more income from their phone than a college degree could provide. They claim the system traps individuals in debt and unfulfilling jobs, and that rich people perpetuate wealth by withholding knowledge from the poor and middle class. The speaker concludes that self-education is the only escape from this system, and that college is only worthwhile if a specific passion requires a degree.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here's why I'm not gonna go to college. First off, the whole school system is basically just a scam designed to turn everybody into a bunch of employees who can't think for themselves. John d Rockefeller is the richest man in American history, and he was known for being corrupt. He started the general education board. He did this so he can mold everybody into being employees for his businesses because it's easy to control everybody when you control what they think 8 hours a day, 5 days a week, their whole life growing up, and then make it illegal for them not to do it. This man literally said, I don't want a nation of thinkers. I want a nation of workers. School doesn't teach you anything about basic money skills or investing in building wealth, but instead teaches you to show up on time, sit still, be quiet, do what you're told, and memorize some whitewashed history for a couple days till the test comes, then you forget it all right after. They wanna make you smart enough to where you can work your 9 to 5 job and do what your boss says, but not smart enough to where you can think on your own and understand the messed up system you're in. School's not teaching you how to think. It's telling you what to think. The school system doesn't reward you when you come up with ideas and think for yourself. It rewards you when you fill in bubbles on a pointless test and get perfect attendance. The world changes every year, but the schools have stayed the same forever. So everything they're teaching is just outdated now, and you can just Google it. I don't wanna be a doctor or a lawyer or something. I just wanna have a ton of money and be financially free. So instead of wasting my time memorizing algebra equations I'll never use and getting straight a's, I learned about investing and starting businesses, so now I'm able to make more money from my iPhone than any college degree would ever make me. And I was able to do this all just by watching YouTube videos and googling stuff, but the system doesn't want you to know this because they want you to go to college and put yourself in debt with a $100,000 loan knowing you know nothing about money. So you can go eat pizza rolls and ramen for 4 years learning about something you have no interest in. So you can go work a job making $50,000 a year and then retire broke. Nowadays, the only reason to go to college would be if your passion requires a degree. But other than that, it's just a waste. Rich people stay rich by never teaching the poor and middle class what they know. The whole system's a trap, and the only way to escape it is by educating yourself.
Saved - November 12, 2024 at 8:52 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

This was how they rigged the education system https://t.co/xaglcPKsWk

Video Transcript AI Summary
John D. Rockefeller strategically used his wealth to influence education, establishing the University of Chicago and the General Education Board to promote a vision of education that favored obedience over critical thinking. He collaborated with Frederick Taylor Gates, who outlined a plan to mold society's youth into compliant workers rather than thinkers or creators. Similarly, Andrew Carnegie founded the Carnegie Foundation to shape the education system. Both foundations sought to alter the teaching of American history to align with their goals. They recruited historians to create a narrative that emphasized collectivism, culminating in a significant study that suggested the future of the country lay in collectivism administered efficiently.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: His dealings, Rockefeller made sure to get the better end of the bargain. He would donate his great wealth to the creation of public institutions. But those institutions would be used to bend society to his will. As every would be ruler throughout history has realized, society has to be transformed from the ground up. Americans in the 19th century still prized education and intellectual pursuits, with the 18 40 census finding unsurprisingly that the United States, a nation that had been mobilized by tracts like Thomas Paine's remarkably popular Common Sense, was a nation of readers with a remarkable 93% to 100% literacy rate. Before the first compulsory schooling laws in Massachusetts in 1852, education was private and decentralized. And as a result, classical education, including study of Greek and Latin and a solid grounding in history and science, was widespread. But a nation of individuals who could think for themselves was anathema to the monopolists. The Oligarchs needed a mass of obedient workers, an entire class of people whose intellect was developed just enough to prepare them for lives of drudgery in a factory. Into the midst stepped John D. Rockefeller with his first great act of public charity, the establishment of the University of Chicago. He was aided in this task by Frederick Taylor Gates, a Baptist minister that Rockefeller befriended in 18/89, and who would go on to be John D's most trusted philanthropic advisor. Gates would go on to write a short tract, The Country School of Tomorrow, that laid out the Rockefeller Plan for Education. In our dream, we have limitless resources and the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hand. The present educational conventions fade from our minds and, unhampered by tradition, we work our own goodwill upon a grateful and responsive folk. We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning or science. We are not to raise up from among them authors, orators, poets or men of letters. We shall not search for embryo great artists, painters, musicians, nor will we cherish even the humbler ambition to raise up from among them lawyers, doctors, preachers, politicians, statesmen of whom we now have ample supply. Although Rockefeller's resources weren't exactly limitless, they might as well have been. In 1902, he established the General Education Board to help implement Gates' vision for the country school of tomorrow with a staggering $180,000,000 endowment. The Rockefeller influence on education was felt almost immediately. And it was amplified by help from fellow monopolists of the era who were approaching the topic of philanthropy from the same angle. Although best known as a steel magnate, Andrew Carnegie's fortune started on the railroads transporting Rockefeller's Standard Oil around the country and was greatly magnified by a lucrative investment in property near Oil Creek that provided steady, profitable oil sales. In 1905, he established the Carnegie Foundation For the Advancement of Teaching, a tax free foundation through which Carnegie and his appointees could direct the development of the education system in the United States and eventually, worldwide. In 1910, Rockefeller followed suit by establishing the Rockefeller Foundation, which became the tax free umbrella organization for his philanthropic ambitions. As the Reece Committee, a congressional investigation into the activities of these tax free foundations in the 1950s discovered, it wasn't long before Carnegie's endowment approached Rockefeller's foundation with a proposal to cooperate on their shared desire to transform the American education system in their own image. Norman Dodd, the director of research for the congressional committee who was granted access to the Carnegie Endowment's board minutes, explains. Speaker 1: So they approach the Rockefeller Foundation with the suggestion that that portion of education, which is could be considered domestic, be handled by the Rockefeller Foundation, and that portion, which is international, should be handled by the endowment. And they then decide that the key to the success of these two operations lay in the an alteration of the teaching of American history. So they approach 4 of the then most prominent teachers of American history in the country, people like Charles and Mary Bird. And their suggestion to them is will they alter the manner in which they present this subject and they get turned down flat. So they then decide that it is necessary for them to do as they say, build our own stable of historians. And and then they approach the Guggenheim Foundation which specializes in fellowships and say, when we find young men in the process of studying for doctorates in the field of American history and we feel that they are, the right caliber, will you grant them fellowships on our say so? And the answer is yes. So under that condition, eventually, they assemble 20. And they take this 20 potential teachers of American history to London, and there they're briefed into what is expected of them when as and if they secure appointments in keeping with the doctorates they will have earned. And, that new that group of 20 historians ultimately becomes a nucleus of the American Historical Association. And then toward the end of the 19 twenties, the endowment grants to the American Historical Association $400,000 for a study of our history in a manner which points to what, can this country be can it look forward to in the future. And, that culminates in a 7 volume study book study. The last volume of which is, of course, an essence of summary of the contents of the other 6. And the essence of the last volume is the future of this country belongs to collectivism administered with characteristic American efficiency.
Saved - November 15, 2024 at 11:52 AM

@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸

Wow if you haven’t seen this clip with Pete Hegseth interview with Shawn Ryan it’s definitely worth a watch! He talks about how bad our government schools have become over time. Get your children out if you can! 🫡✊🔥 https://t.co/OK1WDnlEjc

Video Transcript AI Summary
Get your kids out of government schools if you can. The education system has been federalized over the last century, influenced by atheists, Marxists, and humanists who reject Christianity. They aim to manipulate children's thinking and disrupt family relationships by removing God from schools. Historically, the Bible and prayer were part of education until a misinterpretation of the First Amendment led to their removal. The pledge of allegiance, originally written by a socialist minister, was altered to include "under God" during the Cold War. The education system promotes democracy, which the founders opposed, and uses language manipulation to create alternate realities that increase control and power.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Get out. Get your kids out of government school systems right now if you can. If you have any way. You know, save money, move, get a second job, don't take the vacation, sell the boat, whatever. Drive for Uber. Figure out what you need to do to get your kid out of the government school system because it's about saving your kid right now. Mhmm. So, what I wanna know is what's being pumped into the minds of those kids. And what you realize when you pull the curtain back over a 100 years is the entire pipeline of our education has system has been federalized intentionally. And taken over not just by, like, left lefties or or or technocrats or bureaucrats. Everyone you meet through that time line who's pushing hard on the shoulder of of on the plow of education is an atheist, a Marxist, or a socialist, or a humanist. There are a lot of them are humanists, which is What's a humanist? Humanist is basically completely rejects Christianity or faith at all. And so it's all humanity is at the center of good and evil, right and wrong. It's effectively secularism pause posited as an alternative religion to Christianity. Oh. So it'll it'll find politics as an avenue, and so humanists are often socialists or Marxists or communists in alongside being a humanist. But it's it's the worship of of mankind as the highest being as opposed to god as the highest being. So they're all that that's the train of people pushing this educational philosophy. And when you I used to think it started in the sixties. It actually goes back to the progressive era and even before that. But they very intentionally the one thing they knew they had to remove from the beginning was god. God had to come out of the schools because god was the immovable object that prevented their utopian schemes. They wanted you know, if you wanna manipulate children, if you wanna change the way they think, rewire the relationship of families, you have to get at the God thing because the the garden and the sin in the garden is all, disrupts those utopian schemes. And so the early progressives, communists, Marxists, very intentionally worked hard in their in creating systems that slowly but surely removed God. Because if you went into a public public school, government school in America in the 18 fifties or 18 seventies and 18 thirties, the bible's in there, Prayer's in there. Scripture reading's in there. It's all in there. So it's a modern court that made all those things unconstitutional based on a misreading of the first amendment and freedom of religion versus freedom from religion, and the progressives have exploited that. And then the the process from there to they used patriotism, falsely to sort of get rid of god. And then once they built an allegiance to state and and what that was is they replaced basically the cross in the bible with the flag and a pledge. The original pledge of allegiance was written by a socialist minister, and it did not include under god. The pledge of allegiance originally didn't include under god. Eisenhower added under god in the fifties when we were fighting the godless communists. So you you have a flag and you have a pledge, a pledge of allegiance to the republic. By the way, we're a republic, not a democracy, and our education system pumps democracy down people's throats. And our founders couldn't stand democracy, but that's a whole another a whole another ballgame. The left always changes language. They change language to change to create an alternate reality, to manipulate human beings into whatever utopian scheme of 15 minutes ago they wanna advocate for that increases their power and control. And they saw the government school system as the best entity to do that in, and so they focused and pushed.
Saved - December 5, 2024 at 6:22 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

We were never taught about this in school 👇 https://t.co/aERyqgZWCa

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1932, over 10,000 World War I veterans marched to Washington, demanding immediate cash bonuses promised to them. As tensions rose, President Hoover ordered their evacuation. General MacArthur led troops, including cavalry and infantry, into the capital, using tear gas and bayonets against the veterans. The situation escalated, with troops setting fire to the veterans' camps, creating chaos and panic. Many veterans felt betrayed by their country, believing they would not face military force. The violent eviction led to a shift in public sentiment against Hoover, particularly highlighted by the story of Joe Angelo, a veteran who had previously saved General Patton. The Bonus Army was ultimately dispersed, leaving many veterans in despair, highlighting the need for systemic change in America.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 1932, Washington was under siege. The capital was surrounded by over 10,000 employed veterans of World War I from all over the country. Their only assets were the bonus certificates they've been given after the war which promised a cash bonus sometime in the future. They needed it now. Speaker 1: At the end of May 1932, nearly 10,000 bonus marchers occupied the nation's capital, and tens of thousands more were on their way. Speaker 2: Fortunate to get my bonus, and I'm gonna wait for the light to get it. I have to wait till 1945. Speaker 3: But that brought you to Washington. I'd have beat the undertaker, spend the money before the undertaker gets it. Speaker 4: I don't Speaker 5: know who's made this country worth living in. It's you, fellas. Look. Thanks for being so damn mad a whole lot of people speak of you as tramps. My god, they didn't speak of you as tramps in 1917 and 18. No. Take it from me. This is the greatest demonstration of Americanism we've ever had. Pure Speaker 0: Americanism. President Hoover was left to deal with the veterans when the senate rejected their demands. The marchers had stayed camped out in central Washington. Speaker 1: On July 16th, the last day Congress was in session. Washington was on edge. Thousands of angry veterans surrounded the capital. Near midnight, the 72nd Congress adjourned. Congressmen left through back doors and underground tunnels to avoid confrontations. The situation had come to a head. The president ordered the evacuation of the veterans from downtown Washington. Speaker 6: Now you bring in the troops. Speaker 7: When MacArthur moved his troops to the affected area, he knew exactly what he's going to do. And he adorned himself in his dress uniform along with his major aid, Dwight d Eisenhower. Speaker 1: The force stepped off at 4:30 PM. More than 200 cavalrymen spread out across Constitution and Pennsylvania avenues. Behind them came 400 infantrymen, followed up by tanks and armored vehicles. The cavalrymen, Speaker 6: one of whom is major Patton, have got their sabers out. Speaker 1: The soldiers don gas masks and without warning, began hurling gas grenades at the veterans. The troops advanced, some jabbing with bayonets. Speaker 8: It's war. The greatest concentration of fighting troops in Washington since 18/65. Speaker 4: I knew something was gonna happen that there might be a attack. And, I had a press card, so I passed the police line and then I saw the soldiers advancing into the camp. And when confronted with this, the men all stood there and said, stand firm as long as you can. And, they started throwing tear gas. The tear gas was just burning my face. I was trailing behind my dad and he kept going, come on, boy. Come on, boy. Speaker 1: Marchers were choking from the gas just like the battlefields in France. Speaker 8: And so they're being forced out of their shacks by smoke bomb and tear gas, hurled by the troops who have been called out by the president of the United States. Speaker 4: I've never seen anything like it. It systematically went down the line, burned up all the tents, all the possessions of the people there. I was thinking of Herbert Hoover when this happened because his election was in 3 months. I thought this would be, would to be the finish of Hoover. Speaker 8: The orders of the president must be obeyed, and the roaring flames sound the death knell to the fantastic bonus arms in the shadow of the beautiful dome of the capital of the United States of America. Speaker 9: The veterans did not believe the country for which they had fought would ignore the plight into which the Depression had placed them. Many did not believe that United States troops would take the field against them. Speaker 1: By early evening, most of the marchers had been driven across a drawbridge that led to their main camp. Speaker 6: The president does not want MacArthur to cross the bridge, And MacArthur disregards the order. Eisenhower later says that he saw this happen. MacArthur says, I cannot bother with pieces of paper doing a military operation. And so he crosses the bridge. Speaker 1: All through the camp were scenes of panic. Speaker 10: My dad says, let's get the hell out of here. These soldiers are gonna kill us. Speaker 1: Then troops began to set fire to their wooden shacks. One reporter wrote, the blaze was so big it lit the whole sky. A nightmare come to life. The president looked out a window of the White House in the direction of the fire, then retired for the night. Speaker 8: And the roaring flames sound the death knell to the fantastic bonus army that ends so disastrously in the shadow of the capital of the United States of America. Speaker 1: The morning after the bonus route, public sentiment took a dramatic turn against Herbert Hoover. If the expulsion needed a human face, it came in a person of Joe Angelo whose story was published across the nation. Speaker 11: Joe Angelo gets the distinguished service cross for saving Patton's life on the battlefield. The next morning, Angelo comes to the, burned out field to see Patton. Patton says, take this man away. I don't wanna see this man. Speaker 12: The BEF was broken up. The men returned to some city or other there to roam the streets hopelessly, seeking work or to shuffle in bread lines. There they remain crying examples not of the need for the bonus, but of the need for a new American system.
Saved - December 16, 2024 at 4:33 PM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

@MmisterNobody https://t.co/5BOtbBc9AO "They don't want well informed, well educated people" George Carlin

Video Transcript AI Summary
They don't want a population capable of critical thinking or well-informed citizens. Instead, they seek obedient workers—people just smart enough to operate machines and handle paperwork, but not smart enough to challenge the system. This system has been failing workers for decades, offering increasingly worse jobs with lower pay, longer hours, and disappearing benefits. Now, they're targeting Social Security, aiming to take retirement funds to benefit their wealthy allies on Wall Street. Ultimately, they control everything, and the rest of us are excluded from their elite circle.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But I'll tell you what they don't want. They don't want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They don't want well informed, well educated people capable of critical thinking. They're not interested in that. That doesn't help them. That's against their interest. That's right. They don't want people who are smart enough to sit around the kitchen table to figure out how badly they're getting fucked by a system that threw them overboard 30 fucking years ago. They don't want that. You know what they want? They want obedient workers. Obedient workers. People who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork and just dumb enough to passively accept all these increasingly shittier jobs with the lower pay, the longer hours, the reduced benefits, the end of overtime, and the vanishing pension that disappears the minute you go to collect it. And now they're coming for your Social Security money. They want your fucking retirement money. They want it back so they can give it to their criminal friends on Wall Street. And you know something? They'll get it. They'll get it all from you sooner or later because they own this fucking place. It's a big club, and you ain't in it. You and I are not in the big club.
Saved - December 22, 2024 at 7:22 PM

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

This is an actual teacher. Homeschool your kids https://t.co/Tw3A6uLLsT

Video Transcript AI Summary
Today is gender reassignment day. I’m assigning new genders and pronouns. Jimmy, you’re now she/her. Carlos, you’re Carla, she/they. Rebecca, those shoes are non-binary. Jack, you’re now Jackie, she/her. Everyone at this table is non-binary. Sam, you’re non-binary Sam. Chad, you remain a Chad. Are you all happy with your genders? No? Too bad! For homework, if you’re a guy, listen to Nickelback and Joe Rogan. If you’re a woman, just keep being a woman. Non-binary folks, I expect colored hair by Monday. Thank you!
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright, everybody. Today is gender reassignment day. I'm gonna come around and give you each a new gender and pronouns. Jimmy, you're now, she, her. Carlos, you're now Carla. She, they. Rebecca, those shoes are giving pure cuteness, but they're also giving non binary. And Jack. Jack, you are now Jackie. She, her. This whole table, non binary. What? Sam. You are now Sam, but non binary Sam. Thank you. Thank you. Oh my god. And Chad yo. Chad, you are still a Chad. Keep it a Chad. Okay. Keep him. Alright, everybody. Are you happy with your gender? No. That's too bad. Alright. So for homework, if you're a guy, you now need to listen to Nickelback and Joe Rogan. If you're a woman, things are already tough enough for you. Just keep being a woman. And if you're non binary, I need colored hair by Monday. Thank you.
Saved - January 19, 2025 at 3:25 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
What if "The Plan" has been unfolding since 1776, intertwining figures like Tesla, JFK, Trump, and biblical prophecy? I explore the idea that the Founding Fathers aimed to counter a long-standing cabal controlling humanity. The narrative suggests that central banking has been a primary tool of this cabal, suppressing innovation and freedom. Key events, including WWII, the rise of the CIA, and JFK's assassination, are framed as part of a spiritual and political battle. Ultimately, I believe this journey leads to a Great Awakening, restoring sovereignty and revealing hidden truths.

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

“What if?”—From 1776 to Trump. This is THE PLAN. 🧵 1 of 50 What if “The Plan” wasn’t new but centuries in the making? What if it all started in 1776? What if Tesla, JFK, Trump, Q, and biblical prophecy were threads in The Great Awakening? What if connecting the dots could help to “Paint the picture”? What if we go deeper? #WhatIf🧵👀👇

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

Before 1776: 🧵 2 of 50 What if “The Plan” began with the Founding Fathers? What if they were building more than just a nation? What if they were a countermeasure against a centuries-old tyrannical cabal enslaving humanity? What if Thomas Jefferson’s warnings about central banking was the spark that set everything in motion?

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

The Cabal’s Origins: 🧵 3 of 50 What if the cabal has ruled humanity for centuries? What if monarchies, religion, and financial systems were [THEIR] tools of control? What if, by the 1700s, the British Empire was [THEIR] crown jewel? What if the American Revolution wasn’t just about independence but a rebellion against [THEM]?

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

1776 and the Declaration of War: 🧵 4 of 50 What if the Declaration of Independence wasn’t just about freedom from Britain but freedom from the cabal? What if the founding of America was spiritual warfare? What if it was a declaration of war against [THEIR] global dominance? What if it was the first major counterstrike for freedom?

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

The Central Bank: 🧵 5 of 50 What if central banking has always been [THEIR] primary weapon? What if Thomas Jefferson didn’t warn us about this from the very beginning? What if Andrew Jackson’s fight against the “Den of Vipers” was a pivotal moment in this war? What if the Federal Reserve, created in 1913, was [THEIR] ultimate weapon of economic slavery? What if central banking wasn’t just about controlling money but about controlling innovation? What if [THEY] used economic slavery to stifle progress and technological breakthroughs? What if central banking and technological suppression are two sides of the same coin, designed to keep humanity in chains?

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

Enter Nikola Tesla: 🧵 6 of 50 What if Nikola Tesla wasn’t just an inventor but a disruptor? What if his work on free energy and wireless power threatened [THEIR] monopolies of money, energy, and control? What if his research was seized after his death, but never truly lost? What if John G. Trump, Donald Trump’s uncle, safeguarded Tesla’s secrets to ensure they wouldn’t be lost forever?

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

Tesla’s Legacy: 🧵 7 of 50 What if Tesla’s vision of limitless energy was the first real threat to [THEIR] systems of control? What if his suppressed inventions hold the key to breaking humanity’s dependence on scarcity? What if Tesla’s work isn’t lost but waiting to be revealed in The Great Awakening? What if anti-gravity, free energy, and hidden cures were concealed by [THEM] to keep humanity enslaved?

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

WWII: 🧵 8 of 50 What if WWII wasn’t just a war but a massive reorganization of power? What if the cabal funded both sides to ensure [THEIR] influence no matter who won? What if Eisenhower’s warning about the Military-Industrial Complex was about [THEM]? What if Operation Paperclip brought Nazi scientists—and [THEIR] ideologies—into America? What if these ideologies infiltrated our institutions that govern us even to this day? What if history isn’t what we were told?

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

Birth of the CIA: 🧵 9 of 50 What if the CIA’s creation in 1947 marked the rise of a shadow government? What if its purpose wasn’t to protect freedom but to control narratives and ultimately control us? What if Eisenhower’s warning wasn’t just about military contractors but about intelligence networks? What if the CIA used Operation Mockingbird in the late 1940s to turn journalism into propaganda, and journalists into CIA assets?

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

The CIA didn’t just influence journalists—it OWNED them. Former CIA Director William Casey made that very clear saying: “The CIA owns ANYONE of significance in the major media.” So what’s a TV? 📺 A tool to “Tell-A-Vision”—to “Tell Lies Visually”. 🐦🖥️ Through “4AM talking points,” the [C]lowns [I]n [A]merica feed propaganda to journalists, who then regurgitate it as news. JFK saw this manipulation firsthand because he understood that if [THEY] Control the news, [THEY] will control the people.

Video Transcript AI Summary
We are committed to serving our local communities and take pride in delivering quality, balanced journalism. However, we are concerned about the rise of biased and false news, particularly on social media. Many media outlets share unverified stories, contributing to misinformation. This trend is alarming, especially as some individuals use their platforms to promote personal biases and agendas. Such actions pose a significant threat to our democracy. It is crucial to recognize the dangers of unchecked information and the impact it has on public discourse. We must prioritize factual reporting to protect the integrity of our democratic processes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And Fox San Antonio's Jessica Headley. And I'm Ryan Wolf. Our greatest responsibility is to serve our Treasure Valley Communities. The El Paso, Las Cruces communities. Eastern Iowa Communities. Mid Michigan Communities. We are extremely proud of the quality, balanced journalism that CBS 4 News produces. But We are concerned about the trouble of trying to get irresponsible of one side of news stories plaguing our country plaguing our country. The sharing of biased and false news has become all too common on social media. While alarming, some media outlets publish the same fake stories without checking facts first. The sharing of biased and false news has become all too common on social media. More alarming before media. RBC phone media. Policy victims are true without checking facts first. Unfortunately, some of our members in the youth of their platforms to push their own personal bias and agenda control. To control exactly one of the people's faces. Dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

Operation GLADIO: 🧵 10 of 50 What if Operation Gladio, launched in 1949, wasn’t just a Cold War tactic but proof of the cabal’s playbook? What if Operation Gladio, wasn’t about defending Europe but controlling it? What if NATO’s “stay-behind” networks were designed not to fight communists but to destabilize nations? What if the CIA and MI6 orchestrated terror attacks to manipulate public opinion? What if Gladio became the playbook for how [THEY] control the world through fear and laid the foundation for the [DEEP STATE]? What if Trump’s moves against NATO isn’t just strategy, but a direct blow to the Invisible Enemy? Want more information on Operation Gladio? Follow 👉 @ColonelTowner

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

[C]lowns [I]n [A]merica: 🧵 11 of 50 What if MKUltra, launched in 1953, was used to develop mind control for psychological warfare? What if Operation Northwoods in 1962 proposed False Flags to justify war? What if Operation Popeye in 1967 weaponized weather to control battlefields? What if MKUltra, propaganda, and regime changes were [THEIR] tools to maintain global dominance and power? What if the CIA saw JFK as a threat to their agenda and was weaponized against him?

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

JFK’s Vision: 🧵 12 of 50 What if JFK wasn’t just a president but a champion for FREEDOM? What if the greatest threat he faced was the power of the global banking cartel? What if his speeches exposing secret societies made him a target? What if JFK wanted to shatter the CIA into a thousand pieces? What if breaking [THEIR] financial chains became his primary focus? What if Executive Order 11110 was designed to dismantle the Federal Reserve once and for all? What if his assassination was [THEIR] desperate move to maintain their systems of control?

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

The JFK assassination wasn’t just about how it happened—it was about why. It wasn’t a murder—it was a coup, the opening salvo in a war for humanity’s future. JFK, TRUMP, ELON, SPACE FORCE, WEAPONIZED WEATHER, BITCOIN, PEPE, “COVFEFE”, Q, JESUS—it’s ALL connected. Let’s dive in. 🧵👇

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

JFK’s Death: 🧵 13 of 50 What if JFK’s push to expose secret societies and his fight against the Federal Reserve made him the ultimate threat to [THEM] and [THEIR] Globalist Agenda? What if JFK’s assassination wasn’t just about how it happened—it was about why it happened? What if his vision for a world free from the cabal sparked a silent war? What if his sacrifice united and activated a network of Patriots working behind the scenes on “The Plan” that was already in motion, just waiting for the right moment? What if these Patriots were determined to finish what he started? What if [THEY] underestimated something, and his death marks the true beginning of “The Plan”? What if the torch was passed in silence to ensure it could never be extinguished from Father to Son? What if that’s why JFK’s grave burns with the Eternal Flame?

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

JFK’s Legacy 🧵 14 of 50 What if JFK’s dream of shattering the CIA was the beginning of THE PLAN? What if Trump, Q, and Patriots are carrying his torch? What if ‘Where we go one, we go all’ is more than a phrase—it’s a promise? What if JFK’s vision is finally coming to fruition?

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

Enter JFK Jr.: 🧵 15 of 50 What if JFK Jr.’s friendship with Trump was by design? What if JFK Jr.’s death wasn’t a tragedy but a strategy and integral part to “The Plan”? What if he’s ready to finish what his father started? What if this was the moment Patriots began working behind the scenes? What if his death elevated the silent war to a whole new level? What if JFK Jr. isn’t gone but waiting? What if Q’s question—“At what stage do you play the TRUMP card?”—not only reveals the timing, but holds a deeper meaning as the key to this moment in time?

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

“The Start”: 🧵 16 of 50 What if JFK Jr.’s plane crash wasn’t just a tragedy but “The Start”? What if this event, by design, paved the way for HRC’s Senate run, exposing the Clinton Foundation’s “Pay-for-Play” schemes and Ukraine as its largest donor? What if “They never thought she would lose,” but her loss revealed [THEIR] 16-Year Plan? What if JFK Jr.’s friendship with Trump wasn’t just personal but strategic? What if JFK Jr. sacrificed himself, to activate THE PLAN—creating the perfect storm, in order to set the stage for Trump? 🧢 @qaggnews

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

Trump & The Plan: 🧵 17 of 50 What if Trump’s rise wasn’t random but the next step to continue JFK’s mission? What if Trump’s presidency wasn’t just a fluke but decades in the making? What if Patriots worked behind the scenes the whole time to position Trump as the disruptor-in-chief? What if his rise was carefully orchestrated to counter [THEM]? What if dismantling NATO, the Federal Reserve, and the UN was just the beginning of restoring FREEDOM? What if Q’s “expand your thinking” meant reimagining what’s possible when humanity is truly free?

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

Project Looking Glass: 🧵 18 of 50 What if Patriots have access to tools like Project Looking Glass? What if Q’s phrase “Future proves past” is more literal than we think? What if Trump’s team being ten steps ahead isn’t luck but a strategy? What if every series of “Mathematically impossible coincidences” and Deltas are calculated moves in this timeline? What if time itself could be harnessed as a weapon? 🧢 @qaggnews

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

Space Force: 🧵 19 of 50 What if when Trump inherited JFK’s war he decided to take the fight to a whole new battlefield? What if Trump created the Space Force as the ultimate weapon and shield to reclaim the skies. What if Space Force isn’t just about space wars but also reclaiming Tesla’s suppressed technologies such as anti-gravity, free energy, and more? What if the cabal enslaved humanity through scarce resources and controlled narratives? What if Space Force is breaking those chains?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Space is crucial to modern life and warfare, impacting everything from GPS to military operations. As threats like cyberattacks and satellite jamming increase, a dedicated military branch focused on space is essential. The United States Space Force is being established with expertise from the Air Force, joint services, and the private sector, preparing for challenges well into the 22nd century. As adversaries explore the moon and private companies innovate in space, we must stay ahead. The Space Force will defend our nation both on Earth and in space, adapting to an environment without borders or conventional rules. We will envision the unimaginable and prepare for the impossible, thinking beyond traditional limits and into the vastness of space.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, space is essential not only to our way of life. It's absolutely critical to the modern way of war. GPS, ATMs, cell phones, gas pumps, traffic lights, power grids, guided missiles, surveillance, RPAs, ground combat control. There's no such thing as a day without space operations. You just don't see them. Earth is only half the battle. Cyberattacks and jamming of our satellites. Microsatellites that can create a debris field. At 17,000 miles an hour, a piece of metal the size of a coin can be weaponized. Now is the time for a military branch with a clear and singular focus on space. A military branch that protects the hopes and dreams of America and our way of life as the space domain becomes more and more contested. It's time for another giant leap. The United States Space Force is being built from the brightest minds across the space operations of the air force, our joint services, and the private sector. We aren't just getting ready for the near future. We're getting ready for the 22nd century. When our enemies ask, what if? We will have an answer. When foreign powers can build bases on the dark side of the moon, when private companies are inventing a new economy beyond our planet, we need to stay one step ahead of the future. The future is where we'll make history. We will fight in an environment with no up or down, no left or right, where there are no borders and nowhere to hide. Our space force is defending our country here on earth and wherever our mission takes us. As commerce and exploration expand, we will imagine the unimaginable, anticipate the inconceivable, and prepare for the impossible. We won't just think outside the box. We'll think outside the atmosphere in one of the most challenging environments ever known.

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

Enter Elon Musk: 🧵 20 of 50 What if Elon Musk isn’t just an entrepreneur but a disruptor? What if SpaceX wasn’t just about rockets, and what if Starlink wasn’t just about internet and they’re both an important part of “The Plan” to bypass [THEIR] control of communication and energy? What if X signals the beginning of a decentralized future? What if @X killed the Mockingbird Media?

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

Rothschild-Controlled Israel: 🧵 21 of 50 What if when Q said: “We are saving Israel for last” that there was a “very specific reason not mentioned a single time”? What if that wasn’t just a Q phrase but a keystone in “The Plan”? What if biblical prophecy foretells its liberation, exposing [THEIR] entire system of lies and corruption? What if freeing Israel exposes [THEIR] entire [DEEP STATE] system of control? What if [THEIR] house of cards collapses after [THEY] are exposed? What if the Rothschilds built Israel as a geopolitical pawn, by controlling it to manipulate and control the world?

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

🧵 1 of 21 Is Israel the prophetic fulfillment of God’s covenant, or has it been hijacked by global elites? The answers are in the Rothschild connection, biblical prophecy, and the hidden layers of control. Buckle up—this one’s going deep. 👀👇

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

Biblical: 🧵 22 of 50 What if The Plan’s final act liberates Israel and fulfills prophecy? What if Q’s phrase “Biblical” refers to both exposing [THEIR] control and restoring divine sovereignty? What if Trump’s rise and Israel’s liberation isn’t just political but rather a part of a greater spiritual battle being fought? What if WWG1WGA is more than a slogan, but a divine promise for humanity?

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

The Global Luciferian Cabal: 🧵 23 of 50 What if “The Plan” goes beyond America? What if the Rothschilds, the Vatican, and the City of London represent the trinity of globalist control? What if Trump’s mission is to dismantle [THEIR] global power structure? What if this isn’t just politics but a liberation of humanity from centuries of enslavement? .

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

Enter Q - October 28, 2017: 🧵 24 of 50 What if the first Q drop wasn’t just intel but a public activation signal to the world that the Great Information War has started? What if Anons and the Digital Soldiers were mobilized and activated to take part in this fight? What if this is more than an information war? What if this is a Spiritual War of “Good vs Evil”? What if TRUTH is our sword and awareness is our shield? What if we fight for humanity one mind at a time, as “We take this journey together. One step at a time.”?

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

Enter The Digital Soldiers: 🧵 25 of 50 What if Digital Soldiers are here to spread truth and light the way? What if WWG1WGA is our mission? What if the Anons who “are selfless, nameless, faceless, fameless, and Fearless” “were chosen for a reason.”? What if the Digital Soldiers were “provided the highest level of intel to ever be dropped publicly in the history of the world.”? What if the Anons and the Digital Soldiers are modern-day patriots of the 2nd American Revolutionary War?

Video Transcript AI Summary
We have a network of citizen journalists who have taken control of information through social media. The American people have committed to this plan and stood firm. Our loyalty remains unchanged since day one, and we’ve faced challenges together. We address issues collectively, and as we grow, we continue to follow the same principles. Now, please take your seats as the show is about to begin.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have an army of digital soldiers, but we have what we call citizen journalists. And so the American people decided to take over over the idea of information. They took over the idea of information, and they did it through social media. Stuck to the plan. Always said that we would stand up, never ran. We, the family, loyalty never change up. Been down since day 1, look at where we came from. Jumping out on anybody who try to say some, one thing goodbye. Got a problem, I got the same one. Money rose, we vote. Plenty clubs, we close. Follow the same code. Ladies and gentlemen, please take your seats. The show is about to begin.

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

Enter Pepe: 🧵 26 of 50 What if Pepe the Frog isn’t just a meme but a symbol of the Great Awakening? What if Pepe’s rise represents the triumph of free speech, humor, and truth? What if [THEY] fear Pepe because it shows how memes bypass [THEIR] propaganda and systems of control? What if that’s why Q told us “Memes are important”? 🐸

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

The Great Awakening: 🧵 27 of 50 What if the Q intelligence dissemination program was to invoke an online grassroots movement that came to be called "The Great Awakening". What if The Great Awakening isn’t just about knowledge but liberating humanity’s potential? What if the chains of ignorance, scarcity, and control are breaking? What if the world the [DEEP STATE] has built is collapsing and sovereignty is being restored? What if this is the “Birth Of A New Nation.”? What if this is humanity’s rebirth worldwide? 🧢 @WarNuse

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

The Final Reckoning: 🧵 28 of 50 What if Trump’s Executive Orders and the reinstated federal death penalty are about “Truth, Transparency, and Equal JUSTICE Under the Law.”? What if crimes against humanity, trafficking, and treason are being exposed? What if Q’s word “Pray” signals “The enormity of what is coming will Shock the World.”? What if this is the reckoning [THEY] have always feared? What if RETRIBUTION is coming and there’s NOTHING [THEY] can do to stop it?

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

JUSTICE is Coming: 🧵 29 of 50 What if Q’s timing is deliberate? What if every Q drop is a signal and every move is planned? What if justice isn’t delayed but perfectly timed? What if the chessboard is live, and “the game being played” is now public and no longer private? What if you can feel the wind, hear the thunder, and see the lighting? What if “the storm is upon us”? What if [THEY] are all about to “find out”? 🐸

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

[DS] System Collapse: 🧵 30 of 50 What if 2023–2024 started the collapse of [THEIR] systems? What if failing banks, panicking politicians, and crumbling narratives are all connected? What if Q told us: “Sometimes you can't tell the public the truth. You must show them.” is what we’ve been living through? What if “Nothing can stop what is coming is not just a catch-phrase” and humanity is witnessing [THEIR] end playing out in Real Time?

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

Divine Prophetic Plan: 🧵 31 of 50 What if “The Plan” is both strategic and prophetic? What if the battle between light and dark isn’t new but eternal? What if the cabal’s systems are falling and God’s sovereignty is being restored? What if this isn’t just a war—it’s the final act of redemption?

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

Israel’s Liberation: 🧵 32 of 50 What if saving Israel for last fulfills Biblical prophecy? What if the Rothschilds built Israel as a pawn for control? What if prophecy foretells its liberation? What if Israel’s liberation not only destroys [THEIR] playbook but reveals the LIGHT to the world? What if freeing Israel marks the end of [THEIR] grip on humanity and the beginning of a new era?

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

Sovereignty Restored: 🧵 33 of 50 What if the collapse of [THEIR] systems is paving the way for humanity’s rebirth? What if free markets, free minds, and free energy define our future? What if The Great Awakening isn’t just about exposing lies but restoring what was stolen? What if sovereignty is being reborn?

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

The War for Economic Freedom 🧵 34 of 50 What if restoring sovereignty requires dismantling [THEIR] greatest weapon—central banking? What if the collapse of these systems demands a decentralized alternative? What if Bitcoin and decentralization represent humanity’s escape from economic slavery? What if Bitcoin is the incorruptible answer to the lies of the [DEEP STATE]?

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

It’s not just numbers. It’s prophecy. It’s not just tech. It’s power. When you FIX THE MONEY you FIX THE WORLD. 🌎 As BITCOIN continues to skyrocket the “World is Watching” the Ultimate WMD destroy the [DEEP STATE] and their chains of slavery and control once and for all. TRUMP knows this and that’s why he’s so BULLISH on BITCOIN: “If BITCOIN is going to the moon as we say ‘It’s going to the moon’ I want AMERICA to be the Nation that leads the way!” “‘NOTHING can stop what is coming' is not just a catch-phrase.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
If crypto is to shape the future, it should be mined, minted, and made in the USA. I believe that as Bitcoin rises, America will lead the way in this revolution.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If crypto is going to define the future, I want to be mined, minted, and made in the USA. It's going to be. It's not gonna be made anywhere else. And if Bitcoin is going to the moon, as we say, it's going to the moon. I want America to be the nation that leads the way, and that's what's going to happen.

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

SoftWar & Decentralization: 🧵 35 of 50 What if Bitcoin’s cryptographic strength is more than technology—it’s a weapon in the Information War? What if “SoftWar”, by U.S. Space Force Major Jason Lowery, reveals how decentralization secures sovereignty? What if this isn’t just about money, but FREEDOM itself? Want more information on “SoftWar”? Follow 👉 @JasonPLowery

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

🧵 1 of 16 🔥 The LA fires reveal a horrifying TRUTH: our leaders are letting us burn—literally. $7.5B stolen, hydrants are dry. Government corruption has a chokehold on our future. But there’s a way out, one [THEY] fear. Enter #BITCOIN—the incorruptible answer to the lies of the [DEEP STATE] Let me explain. 🧵 👀👇

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

“Covfefe”: 🧵 36 of 50 What if when Trump tweeted “Covfefe” it wasn’t just a typo but a signal? What if Trump’s “COVFEFE Act” ties into energy and free-flowing communication? What if it represents [THEIR] greatest fear—a world where we’re no longer controlled by scarcity, censorship, or lies? Want more information on “Covfefe”? Follow 👉 @GMONEYPEPE 🐸 🔗 The “Covfefe Dig”: https://badlands.substack.com/p/the-covfefe-dig

The COVFEFE Dig Death of the Petrodollar badlands.substack.com

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

[11.3] — The Keystone: 🧵 37 of 50 What if the DoD Law of War Manual’s [11.3] reveals the legal framework for ending belligerent occupation? What if “[D] + China = 11.3” wasn’t just a code but the blueprint to expose foreign control of U.S. institutions and politicians? What if [11.3] is the key to restoring sovereignty? What if [D] represents the Democratic Party and their ties to China? What if the military has been operating under this framework all along, ready to restore sovereignty? What if Trump’s “loss” in 2020 was bait and a necessary step to activate this process? What if January 20th marks the fulfillment of this strategy?

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

Law of War: 🧵 38 of 50 What if the DoD Law of War Manual has been guiding the silent war through Devolution this whole time? What if belligerent occupation explains everything—from Biden’s “installation” to the military’s role in securing the Republic? What if compliance with international law ensures justice is “clean and swift”? What if every move is calculated to expose [THEM] without risking civil war? Want more information on Devolution? 🧢 @patel_patriot

Video Transcript AI Summary
We are working to eliminate government corruption and restore integrity. Together, we will make America great again. Thank you, and God bless you and America.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have begun to drain the swamp of government corruption. Together, we will make America great again. Thank you. God bless you, and God bless America.

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

[11.3] CONFIRMED: 🧵 39 of 50 What if Trump’s Deputy Chief of Staff, Stephen Miller’s words on Hannity—“THE OCCUPATION ENDS, and liberation day begins”—wasn’t just rhetoric but confirmation? What if Biden’s Administration represents [THEM] losing the war, not winning? What if Trump’s reemergence marks the legal and spiritual end of their control? What if January 20th marks the return of sovereignty to WE THE PEOPLE? What if the military has been silently securing the Republic all along? What if Q’s “Nothing can stop what is coming” is playing out in real time? Video 🧢 @nicksortor

Video Transcript AI Summary
The moment President Trump takes the oath of office, he will declare the end of the occupation and the start of liberation day. He plans to immediately sign executive orders to close the border and initiate the largest deportation operation in American history.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's going to be at light speed, Sean. The moment that president Trump puts his hand on that bible and takes the oath of office, as he has said the occupation ends, liberation day begins. He will immediately sign executive orders, sealing the border shut, beginning the largest deportation operation in American history.

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

The Military: 🧵 40 of 50 What if the military’s role isn’t about optics but enforcing the Law of War? What if exposing [THEM] and forcing compliance with international law prevents civil war? What if every move has been deliberate to deliver justice cleanly, swiftly, and lawfully? What if “the only way is the military”? What if “US Military = savior of mankind”?

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

Wartime President: 🧵 41 of 50 What if Trump’s 2020 statement, “I’m a wartime President…fighting an Invisible Enemy,” wasn’t just about Covid? What if this war was against a foreign-controlled occupation? What if this invisible enemy is [THEM], and the military has been working to deliver justice?

Video Transcript AI Summary
I feel we're in a wartime situation against an invisible enemy. This is a challenging time for all Americans, but we will rise to meet it. We're working with Congress to provide urgent support for workers, small businesses, and industries affected by the virus. Our goal is to deliver relief quickly so families can manage and businesses can retain employees. I believe our economy will rebound significantly once this crisis is over due to pent-up demand. For those feeling anxious, know that I will always fight for you until we achieve victory. This is an unprecedented global attack affecting 144 countries, and we will overcome it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I feel it, actually. I'm a wartime president. This is a war. This is a war. Different kind of a war that we've ever had. I I wanna say that I know that this is a challenging time for all Americans. We're enduring a great national trial, and we will prove that we can meet the moment. I want to assure the American people that we're doing everything we can each day to confront and ultimately defeat this horrible, invisible enemy. We're at war. In a true sense, we're at war, and we're fighting an invisible enemy. Think of that. We're working urgently with congress on legislation to support the millions of workers, small businesses, and industries who have been hit hard by the virus through no fault of their own. Our goal is to get relief to Americans as quickly as possible so that families can get by and small businesses can keep workers on the payroll. This will help our economy and you will see our economy skyrocket once this is over. I think it's gonna skyrocket. It's a it's a pent up demand. It's a built up demand. And, I guess you really have to say who knows, but I think it's gonna be a tremendous day when we win this war. We will win the war. For those worried and afraid, please know as long as I am your president, you can feel confident that you have a leader who will always fight for you, and I will not stop until we win. This will be a great victory. This is going to be a victory, and it's gonna be a victory that, in my opinion, will happen much sooner than, originally expected. It's now attacking. The enemy is attacking 144 countries at this moment. 144. That's unthinkable. It's never been anything like this, and it's vicious. It is vicious.

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

“Military Planning at Its Finest”: 🧵 42 of 50 What if this isn’t just “politics as usual” but “Military Planning at Its Finest”? What if every move is calculated to expose [THEM] while protecting the Republic? What if the Law of War Manual is the script? What if January 20th truly marks the “END OF OCCUPATION” and the dawn of liberation?

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

The TRUMP Card: 🧵 43 of 50 What if the TRUMP card is the ultimate revelation about to be played? What if Q’s question—“At what stage do you play the TRUMP card?”—is a clue? What if Trump’s every move dismantles [THEIR] playbook? What if the TRUMP card is about to flip the world upside down? What if National Popcorn Day, Trump’s Victory Rally, and Q’s 7-year delta (Q-561) “Judgment Day” all align perfectly on January 19th by design? What if January 20th isn’t just an inauguration but the culmination of “The Plan” and the TRUMP card is played?

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

Are you paying attention, Anon? Trump’s Deputy Chief of Staff, Stephen Miller, was on Hannity tonight and said: “THE OCCUPATION ENDS, and liberation day begins.” FRENS 🐸 I just talked about [11.3] a couple of days ago. The chessboard—or let’s say the stage—is now set. Have you noticed that Washington, D.C. has suddenly disappeared from Google Maps? Think that’s some random coincidence? No. This is a clear signal that the [11.3] marker, “END OF OCCUPATION,” is happening in real time. This isn’t just another chapter in the story—this is the grand finale! Sovereignty is being restored to WE THE PEOPLE, and the [DEEP STATE] empire is crumbling faster than their narratives. Think about the timing of all of this. Trump’s Victory Rally lands on January 19th—the same exact day as National Popcorn Day and the 7-year delta for Q post 561 that says: “Judgment Day.” Coincidence? Hardly. Remember when Q asked, “At what stage in the game do you play the TRUMP card?” Like I said before—the stage is set. This has never been about “politics as usual,” and “this is not another 4-year election.” It’s about “witnessing the systematic destruction of the old guard,” where every move has been calculated. Trump’s “loss” was the bait, and [THEY] took it. This is “Military planning at its finest”—precise and deliberate to ensure that JUSTICE will be “Clean and swift.” 😉 Got popcorn? 🍿 If not, get some—because NOTHING can stop what’s coming. Not distractions, not optics, not lies. The show has begun, and this time, [THEY] can’t change the ending. Just sayin. 😎 @StephenM @seanhannity

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

“TRUMP card coming”: 🧵 44 of 50 What if the storm is the final stage before redemption? What if executive orders are in place, crimes are exposed, and [THEIR] systems are collapsing? What if Q’s phrase “Nothing can stop what is coming” is the ultimate final warning? What if the TRUMP card is already in play?

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

“It's going to be BIBLICAL”: 🧵 45 of 50 What if Q’s phrase “This is not another 4-year election” wasn’t hyperbole? What if we’re watching the systematic destruction of the old guard? What if Trump’s “loss” was the bait, and [THEY] took it? What if justice is coming faster than their narratives can keep up?

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

Have FAITH: 🧵 46 of 50 What if faith is the foundation of The Great Awakening? What if Trump, Q, and Patriots are fighting for humanity’s soul? What if this battle isn’t just political but spiritual? What if “WWG1WGA” is more than a slogan—it’s a rallying cry for hope and unity?

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

The Great Awakening: 🧵 47 of 50 What if The Great Awakening isn’t just about knowledge but liberating humanity’s potential? What if the chains of ignorance, scarcity, and control are breaking? What if Digital Soldiers are here to spread truth and light the way? What if WWG1WGA is our mission?

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

You are The Plan: 🧵 48 of 50 What if “THE PLAN” depends on YOU? What if Q’s phrase—“The choice to know will be yours”—is a call to action? What if seeing the TRUTH isn’t enough? What if we must spread it to wake the masses? What if this is, and has always been, our mission as Anons and Digital Soldiers to wake up the entire world? What if those of us who have followed Q since the beginning will be here to help you make sense of the coming events?

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

The Best Is Yet To Come: 🧵 49 of 50 What if this isn’t just the greatest story of our time but a fulfillment of divine prophecy? What if “The Plan”, from 1776 to now, fulfills both human strategy and divine prophecy? What if “The Plan”—from Tesla’s dreams to biblical prophecy—is about reclaiming humanity’s future? What if “Nothing can stop what is coming” isn’t destiny but design? What if this isn’t just history—it’s the dawn of a new age? What if THE PLAN is God’s blueprint for humanity’s redemption? What if “THE BEST IS YET TO COME” is more than a promise—it’s our destiny? WHAT IF? 😎🔥

Video Transcript AI Summary
America is a land of heroes and legends, home to figures like Thomas Edison, Abraham Lincoln, and Harriet Tubman. Our nation was built by determined men and women who overcame challenges, settled the frontier, and created an exceptional republic. We are pioneers who embraced the belief that all are equal, and this spirit fuels our dreams and aspirations. America is a place of limitless possibilities, where anyone can rise and achieve greatness. The future holds endless opportunities for discovery and adventure, and our journey is just beginning. With a youthful spirit and the grace of God, we look forward to a bright future. The best is yet to come.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: America is a land of heroes, a place where greatness is born, where destinies are forged, and where legends come to life. This is the home of Thomas Edison and Teddy Roosevelt, of many great generals including Washington, Pershing, Patton, and MacArthur. This is the home of Abraham Lincoln, Frederick Douglass, Amelia Earhart, Harriet Tubman, the Wright Brothers, Neil Armstrong, and so many more. This is the country where children learn names like Wyatt Earp, Davy Crockett, and Annie Oakley. This is the place where the pilgrims landed at Plymouth and where Texas patriots made their last stand at the Alamo. The American nation was carved out of the vast frontier by the toughest, strongest, fiercest, and most determined men and women ever to walk on the face of the earth. Our ancestors braved the unknown, came the wilderness, settled the wild west, lifted millions from poverty, disease, and hunger, vanquished tyranny and fascism, ushered the world to new heights of science and medicine, laid down the railroads, dug out the canals, raised up the skyscrapers. Our ancestors built the most exceptional republic ever to exist in all of human history, and we are making it greater than ever before. This is our glorious and magnificent inheritance. We are Americans. We are pioneers. We are the pathfinders. We settle the new world. We built the modern world, and we changed history forever by embracing the eternal truth that everyone is made equal by the hand of almighty God. America is the place where anything can happen. America is the place where anyone can rise. And here, on this land, on this soil, on this continent, the most incredible dreams come true. This nation is our canvas and this country is our masterpiece. We look at tomorrow and see unlimited frontiers just waiting to be explored. Our brightest discoveries are not yet known. Our most thrilling stories are not yet told. Our grandest journeys are not yet made. The American age, the American epic, the American adventure has only just begun. Our spirit is still young. The sun is still rising. God's grace is still shining. And my fellow Americans, the best is yet to come.

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

End of thread: 🧵 50 of 50 If you’ve made it this far, ThanQ for reading. This is more than a story—it’s OUR STORY. If this thread resonated with you, please share this thread and help awaken others. Together, we make history and we can be confident that “THE BEST IS YET TO COME.” ThanQ — @DigiSwQll17 🐸 #WWG1WGA ☝️ Please RT the first post listed below 👀👇

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

“What if?”—From 1776 to Trump. This is THE PLAN. 🧵 1 of 50 What if “The Plan” wasn’t new but centuries in the making? What if it all started in 1776? What if Tesla, JFK, Trump, Q, and biblical prophecy were threads in The Great Awakening? What if connecting the dots could help to “Paint the picture”? What if we go deeper? #WhatIf🧵👀👇

@DigiSwQll17 - DIGITAL SWOLLJER 𝕏

@threadreaderapp unroll please!

Saved - January 20, 2025 at 5:46 PM

@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”

“We didn’t try to Brainwash you” https://t.co/8KTRCtMnQj

Saved - February 20, 2025 at 1:38 PM

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

This radical activist is a teacher. These are the people educating your kids. https://t.co/NZ5MUDiiLb

Video Transcript AI Summary
My name is Kiersten, and I'm marching for our democracy because Donald Trump threatens it. He goes against the LGBTQ+ community, my immigrant neighbors, teachers, and school safety. My rights to protest and vote, and to protect my students, are being threatened. As a teacher, I won’t give my kids up. He's trying to go after the First Amendment, which is not acceptable. Project 2025 shows he doesn't want us protesting. Despite being kicked off social media, I don't believe he has sympathy for anyone. I think he is a psychopath. Yes, please, to public execution of Donald Trump and Elon Musk.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi. My name is Kiersten, and I'm marching for our democracy. Speaker 1: Yep. So, what has Donald Trump done that threatens democracy, you think? Speaker 0: Everything. I mean, he's going against the LGBTQ plus community, which is what I'm a part of. He's going against my immigrant neighbors. He's going against the other teachers and, like, our safety in the schools, everything. Speaker 1: So tell me what rights you think have been threatened. Speaker 0: My rights to do this, my voting rights, my rights to protect the people as a teacher. Like, advice comes into my school, I'm not giving my kids up. I think our rights our rights have a full democracy is being Speaker 1: So you're you're a teacher? Speaker 0: I'm a teacher. Yep. Speaker 1: And you said your rights to do this. Right to protest? Speaker 0: Yeah. Right. Has that been threatened? Speech. Freedom of speech. He's trying to go after the first amendment, and that's just not it. That's just not it. Speaker 1: How so? How does he go after the first amendment? He Speaker 0: I mean, that's part of project twenty twenty five. He doesn't want us to be able to do things like this. Okay. And he Speaker 1: You you remember he was kicked off social media platforms. Don't you think he has sympathy towards being Speaker 0: banned? No. No? I don't think he has sympathy for anybody. Speaker 1: Resonance. Speaker 0: Yeah. I don't think he has sympathy. I don't think I think he's a psychopath. I think he doesn't have sympathy for anybody. Speaker 1: Donald Trump's a psychopath. Speaker 0: Oh. Yeah. I really do think so. Speaker 1: You want public execution of Donald Trump and Elon Musk? Speaker 0: Yes, please.
Saved - April 1, 2025 at 12:06 PM

@TaraBull808 - TaraBull

"Everything they taught you in school is all buIIsh*t" https://t.co/rHyfB5T2fP

Video Transcript AI Summary
The president of Argentina declassified documents allegedly showing Hitler fled to Argentina after World War II, lived there until the 1960s, and had two daughters. The CIA and FBI knew and were recruiting Nazi scientists. Nazis escaped to Argentina after World War II via rat lines facilitated by the Catholic Church. The speaker claims the skull the Russians have, purported to be Hitler's, is actually a woman's skull. The speaker alleges that NASA's space program was created by Nazis who were obsessed with fighting communism. The speaker urges listeners to research the religion of the Bolsheviks. The Department of Justice is supposedly going through 16 terabytes of information related to the Epstein case and has found hundreds of child victims.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the president of Argentina, you know, the crazy looking dude that gave Elon that fucking chainsaw for chopping out fucking corruption, he's getting on the declassification party. He dropped a bunch of classified documents from Argentina that show Hitler didn't die in World War two. No. No. He fled to Argentina, lived there until the sixties, had two daughters. Yeah. And the CIA knew about it, so did the FBI. Yeah. Yeah. And they were down there recruiting Nazi scientists because it wasn't just Hitler. A fuckload of Nazis escaped Argentina after World War two through the rat lines facilitated a lot by the Catholic church. Yeah. How about that? You know? Because everything you were taught in school, it's all bullshit. You don't you don't know fucking shit. If all you know is what they taught you in school, you're just a programmed fucking moron. That's what that is. Yeah. Even the skull that the fucking that the Russians have that they claim as Hitler's, they tested that. It's actually a female woman's skull. It's a woman's skull. It's not and it's not even fuck. They they everybody fucking knew. Everybody fucking knew, and they fucking lied about it. Why? Because they wanted German scientists. That's where our space program came from. All the top motherfuckers at NASA, all Nazis. All of them. All they're all fucking Nazis. That's they they even say that's why we were obsessed with fighting communism after that was because a lot of the Nazis that's what the Nazis were fighting was communism. And where did communism come from? Uh-oh. Now we're getting somewhere. What what was the Bolshevik revolution? You know, that overthrew the czars of Russia? Yeah. Go look up. Go look up what religion the majority of the Bolsheviks that murdered all those people were. Yeah. That'll that's gonna shock you. Little Star of David. People, nothing of what you know have ever been taught is the truth. It's all bullshit. It's all fucking bullshit. This is a new day. Oh, shit, dude. The Epstein fucking files. Oh, 16 terabytes of information is now being gone through by the DOJ. Yeah. They're gonna get to the bottom of that shit, they say. They got a whole task force on it. That's why they couldn't release it because they had they found way more evidence than they thought they were going to find. And with hundreds and hundreds of child victims, they are saying Michael Seraphin released that today. All confirmed. DOJ, FBI is digging deep into it. Gonna get us some accountability. People, welcome to reality because everything you know and have ever been taught is fucking bullshit. Good luck to you all, and long live this beautiful republic.
Saved - April 3, 2025 at 3:37 PM

@MikeASperrazza - Mike Sperrazza

This human should not educate our children. https://t.co/MlCrG6Pqgv

Saved - August 8, 2025 at 1:11 PM

@MrDanielBuck - Daniel Buck, “Youngest Old Man in Ed Reform”

The Simpsons nailed this feelings-first, SEL, California, woke math nonsense 20 years ago😂😂🤣 https://t.co/tdw0osPr1v

Video Transcript AI Summary
Now that the boys are gone, the speaker wants the ladies to focus on math. She asks how numbers make them feel, what a plus sign smells like, and whether the number seven is odd or just different. Another speaker, Lisa, asks if they will do actual math problems, stating that confidence building can't replace real learning. The first speaker accuses Lisa of trying to derail their self-esteem engine and suggests they sing to get back on track. Lisa then sings that the best thing she can ever be is to be okay with herself.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now that the boys and their atmosphere of intimidation are gone, we can finally breathe. Breathe, ladies. Now let's buckle down and do some math. Speaker 1: Yes. How do numbers make you feel? Speaker 0: What does a plus sign smell like? Is the number seven odd or just different? Speaker 1: Are we gonna do any actual math problems? Speaker 0: Problems? That's how men see math, something to be attacked, to be figured out. Speaker 1: But isn't it? I mean, confidence building can't replace real learning. Speaker 0: Lisa, sounds like you're trying to derail our self esteem engine. Let's sing it back on the tracks. Speaker 1: The best thing I can ever be is to be okay with me. Me.
Saved - March 1, 2026 at 11:32 AM

@IntuitMachine - Carlos E. Perez

This is a very important time in history to know the methods of how *you* are being manipulated. https://t.co/xwIcA6RkkR

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Cognitive control runs deeper than simply changing what you think; it shapes the very process of how you think. Are your thoughts really your own? We’ll break down techniques that sneak past your critical thinking to lead you to a conclusion, often without you realizing it. We’ll start with weaponized language, then show how reality itself can be distorted and simplified, and finish with methods that control someone’s entire environment. We begin with weaponizing words. Words are the building blocks of thought, and these techniques create emotional shortcuts before logical analysis can wake up. Loaded language uses words packed with emotional baggage to evoke reaction without evidence. Example contrasts: neutral terms versus loaded ones (public servant vs. bureaucrat; estate tax vs. death tax). Paltering is lying by telling the truth—carefully choosing only true statements to create a misleading picture (e.g., “I did not have textual relations with that chatbot” to imply nothing happened). Obfuscation uses jargon to bury a simple truth under complexity. Rationalization uses emotion-then-logic to defend a decision as if it were purely rational. Section two moves to distorting and simplifying reality. Oversimplification reduces real, messy problems to slogans or black-and-white choices. Out-of-context quotes can make it appear the opposite of what was meant. Limited hangout admits to a small part of a story to appear transparent while hiding the rest. Passe unique (single thought) aims to render opposing viewpoints immoral or unthinkable, narrowing acceptable debate until only one thought remains. The final section covers controlling the environment. Love bombing lavishes praise to secure acceptance, then isolates the person from prior life to foster dependence. Operant conditioning—rewards and punishments on social platforms—shapes behavior; milieux control creates an information bubble that blocks opposing views, discourages critical thinking, and uses its own language to isolate a population. The core takeaway: recognizing these techniques is the first and best defense; awareness reduces their power. The toolkit promises to help you spot propaganda in ads, politics, online groups, and everyday arguments. Speaker 1: Division is a deliberate strategy, not a bug in the system. Chapter one of the playbook focuses on twisting reality to control beliefs. Disinformation is the intentional spread of lies to spark outrage and distrust before facts can be checked, aiming to make you doubt truth itself. FUD—fear, uncertainty, doubt—paralyzes you; the fire hose of falsehood overwhelms with a high volume of junk information across platforms, with no commitment to truth. Euphemism softens harsh realities (civilian deaths becomes collateral damage). The playbook hijacks emotions, demonizes opponents, and sometimes creates manufactured bliss to obscure problems. The long game demoralizes a population to render voting and institutions meaningless, and the endgame is to lock down power by breaking unity among people—pitting departments against each other, issuing nonnegotiable diktats, and launching coordinated harassment campaigns (FLAC) to deter dissent. The objective is poisoning reality to provoke confusion, manipulate emotions, and induce powerlessness. The antidote is naming and recognizing tactics (disinformation, FUD, demonization, etc.) to regain control of the conversation and build more honest, constructive discourse. The information battlefield uses framing, the half-truth, gaslighting, foot-in-the-door tactics, guilt by association, labeling, and latitudes of acceptance to rig debates before they start. The Gish gallop overwhelms with rapid claims; data overload creates a wall of complexity; glittering generalities rely on vague, emotionally charged terms to persuade without substance. Chapter two and beyond emphasize that recognizing the rules of the game lets you slow down, name the tactic, and guide conversations back to facts. The playbook’s architecture: control reality, trigger emotions, build the crowd, and anoint a hero to lead. Understanding these plays is not to promote cynicism, but to enable clearer thinking and more honest dialogue.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, we're diving into something called cognitive control. And look, this isn't just about trying to change what you think. It's actually way deeper than that. We're talking about shaping the very process of how you think. So let me ask you this, are your thoughts really your own? It's a pretty big question. Right? And it's exactly what we're going to dig into. We're gonna break down the specific nitty gritty techniques people use to kinda sneak past your critical thinking and lead you to a certain conclusion. And the crazy part? A lot of the time, you don't even know what's happening. Alright. So here's how we're gonna tackle this. First up, we'll look at how simple words and language get weaponized. Then, we'll get into how reality itself gets distorted and oversimplified. And to wrap it all up, we'll explore the most extreme methods. We're talking about controlling someone's entire environment. Okay. Let's jump right into part one, weaponizing words and language. I mean, think about it. Words are the basic building blocks of how we think, and the techniques we're about to see, they're all designed to create this little emotional shortcut, right? To get a specific reaction out of you before your logical brain even has a chance to wake up. So first up, we've got something called loaded language. This is all about picking words that are already packed with, you know, a ton of emotional baggage. It's like injecting a feeling directly into a sentence so you don't even need a real argument or any evidence to make your point. And this slide is a perfect example. Just look at this. On the left, you have neutral terms. On the right, loaded ones. Public servant sounds pretty noble, right? But bureaucrat? That sounds like someone who loves red tape. Or how about estate tax versus death tax? One's a boring financial term, the other makes it sound like you're being punished for dying. It's the exact same thing but the feeling you get is completely different. Alright. Next up is a really subtle one. It's called paltering, and get this, it's basically the art of lying by only telling the truth. I know, it sounds weird, but you're not actually saying anything that's false. You're just very, very carefully choosing which true things to say to create a totally misleading picture. And this hypothetical quote just nails it. I did not have textual relations with that chatbot. Technically, that's true. They didn't text. But it's designed to make you think nothing happened at all when really they might have had, I don't know, vocal relations. See, it's denial that's not really a denial at all. Super sneaky. Okay. So let's talk about obfuscation. Now if paltering is like a precise surgical strike with the truth, obfuscation is just a giant smoke bomb of complexity. The whole point is to bury a simple and usually inconvenient truth under this huge mountain of jargon and confusing language so that nobody can figure out what's really going on. And to round out this first section, let's talk about rationalization, and honestly, this is something we probably all do. It's when you make a decision based on emotion or a gut feeling, and then you go back and build this perfect logical sounding argument for it. When it's weaponized, it lets people feel really smart and logical about a choice they actually made for reasons they'd rather not admit to. Alright. That brings us to our second section, distorting and simplifying reality. Here, we're moving beyond just the words people use and into techniques that actively twist the frame of reality itself. These are tools designed to construct a very particular and often very false way of seeing the world. And we're kicking it off with oversimplification. You know, real world problems are complicated. They're messy. They take real thought. Well, this technique just throws all that out the window. It boils everything down to a catchy slogan or a simple good versus evil black and white choice. And yeah, it feels simple and decisive but what it's really doing is killing any chance for a nuanced conversation. Okay. Here's a classic. I guarantee you have seen this a million times, taking quotes out of context. It's an incredibly powerful way to make it look like someone said the exact opposite of what they meant just by, you know, chopping off the beginning or the end of their sentence. And this slide shows you exactly how it works. Look at the full quote. While our opponent has some valid points, their overall plan is a disaster. Pretty clear, right? It's a condemnation. But you just snip out that middle part, and suddenly you have an ad that says, our opponent has some valid points. It makes it sound like a full on endorsement. It's completely dishonest, but man, is it effective. Next, we have something called the limited hangout. This term actually comes from the world of spies and intelligence. Here's the scenario. A big scandal is about to break. So what do you do? You strategically confess to a small, not so bad part of the story. It makes you look transparent, like you're coming clean. And hopefully, it gets everyone to stop digging for the much, much bigger truth you're still hiding. And this chart just lays it out perfectly, doesn't it? You admit to this little 10% slice of the pie, you hang it out there for everyone to see and that makes people think they've got the whole story while the other 90% stays completely hidden. Okay. This next one, passe unique, which is French for single thought, is really important to understand. The goal here isn't just to argue that an opposing view is wrong. No. No. The goal is to make that other viewpoint seem immoral, totally socially unacceptable. Basically, to make it unthinkable. It's about shrinking the whole world of acceptable debate until there's only one thought left standing. Alright. Let's get into our final section, and this is where things get really intense. We're talking about controlling the total environment. These tactics aren't just about swaying you on one issue or getting you to make one decision. This is about managing someone's entire reality. And a classic example of this is a tactic often used by cults called love bombing, and it's a very clear step by step process. First, you just shower a new person with praise and affection. Make them feel like the most special person in the world. Step two, you start to slowly cut them off in their old life, their friends, their family. And finally, step three, they become totally dependent on the group for their entire sense of who they are. Now this next one, operant conditioning, might sound like something you'd read about in a dusty old psychology textbook, but trust me, it is being used on a massive scale every single day. It's just a fancy term for a system of rewards and punishments designed to train people to behave in a certain way. And just look at this table. It shows you exactly how social media platforms have pretty much perfected this. You post something the group approves of, boom, you get a reward, likes, shares, positive comments. But what happens if you say something that goes against the grain? Punishment, down votes, public shaming, and over time what does that do? It trains all of us to just self censor and conform. This brings us to milieu control. This is the big one. It's about creating a completely sealed off information bubble. You manage a person's environment so tightly that they never come across an opposing viewpoint or a challenging idea. It's simple really. If you can control everything a person sees and hears, you ultimately control what they sync. And this slide basically gives you the playbook for how to build that bubble. Your strict access to any outside news. You isolate people from anyone who doesn't believe. You create your own special language. You discourage critical thinking at every turn. It is a systematic process of taking apart someone's ability to think for themselves. So, okay. After going through all of that, from sneaky loaded words all the way to total environmental control, it can feel pretty heavy. Right? But here's the most important takeaway of all. The simple act of knowing these techniques exist, of being able to spot them, that is your single most powerful weapon against them. Just being aware is your first and best line of defense. And really, that's the thought I want to leave you with. None of this is just theory or history. These techniques are out there right now all around us. You'll see them in ads. You'll see them in politics. You'll see them in online groups. Alright. Today, we're gonna build a toolkit. This is your personal spotter's guide for one of the most powerful forces out there, propaganda. We're gonna learn how to see it, how to name it, and most importantly, how to neutralize its effect on us. Let's jump in. You've been there, right? We all have. You're in a debate online, maybe in the comments section, and all of a sudden, the ground just shifts under your feet. You're left feeling confused, maybe a little angry, and you're not even sure how the conversation got so completely derailed. It feels like you're playing a game but nobody ever told you the rules. Well, that feeling, it's not an accident. It's often the result of very specific time tested techniques that are designed to control the narrative and get you off balance. So yeah, welcome to the information battlefield. Today, we're gonna learn the strategy. First, let's look at the offensive playbook. These are the proactive tools, the ones used to build a story from the ground up and make it feel solid, inevitable, and, well, true. These are the tools of attack. It all starts with one of the most basic yet incredibly powerful tools in the box, repetition. See, our brains have this funny little shortcut. We tend to mistake something that's familiar for something that's accurate. So when we hear the same message enough times, our brain just kinda starts to accept it as true even if there's no evidence. Psychologists have a name for this, the illusory truth effect. And this is that principle in action. It's the engine that drives slogans, talking points, and yeah, unfortunately, some really big falsehoods. The message is just hammered home again and again and again until it carves out a little space in our minds and starts to feel like just common knowledge. Next up is scapegoating. You've definitely seen this one. When things get complicated or tough, it is so much easier to create a simple villain than it is to actually solve the real problem. This technique takes all that public anger and frustration and just funnels it onto an easy target. It's a perfect distraction from the real issues. And then you've got transfer. This is all about the power of association. You know, think of a politician who's always standing in front of a giant national flag. The goal is to transfer your positive feelings about the flag, patriotism, respect, onto the person. It's a visual shortcut that completely bypasses your logical brain and goes straight for the emotions. Now this is interesting. This slide breaks down two different ways to kind of borrow credibility. On the one hand you've got testimonials. That's pretty straightforward, right? A famous person you admire says they like something. But on the other hand you have the much more subtle third party technique. This is where someone creates what looks like an independent source like a research group or a concerned citizens organization to push their message. One relies on fame, the other creates a totally false sense of objectivity. Okay, so you've built your narrative but what happens when people start poking holes in it? What happens when it comes under attack? Well that's when you switch from offense to defense and you pull out a whole new set of tools designed to protect your position at all costs. The first line of defense is often what aboutism? And let's be clear, this isn't a real argument, it's an escape hatch. Instead of actually addressing a criticism, the speaker just tries to change the subject by pointing a finger and saying, yeah, but what about them? The goal is just to create chaos and totally derail the conversation. And here's a perfect classic example. Notice how the response doesn't even try to deny the original charge. It doesn't offer any counterargument or evidence, it just pivots. It forces the person who made the accusation to suddenly start defending a completely different topic. The original point? It's just gone. The debate is neutralized. Another really powerful defensive tool is the misuse of statistics. We're all taught to trust numbers, right? They feel so objective, so scientific, but data can be twisted and presented in a way to tell pretty much any story you want, giving a totally false conclusion the shiny authoritative veneer of math. Oh, this is a fantastic illustration of how that works. Just look at these two charts. They are showing the exact same data, but in the first chart where the scale goes from zero to 100, the differences look tiny, almost non existent. But in the second chart, just by changing the scale to zoom in on the very top, those same tiny differences suddenly look like a massive dramatic gap. The data didn't change one bit, only the story it was forced to tell. Okay. This one is incredibly sneaky. The unstated assumption works by smuggling a controversial idea into conversation without ever actually saying it out loud. The entire argument is built on this hidden foundation that you're forced to accept just to even participate in the discussion, and this question is the perfect example. It's a classic for a reason. I mean, how do you even answer that? If you give a date you're admitting you used to cheat, if you try to deny it you just sound defensive. The question itself is a trap, and all of its power comes from that unstated, totally unproven assumption that you were a tax cheat to begin with. And finally, we have semantic satiation. This is basically a tactic of neutralization. You take a powerful word that your opponent uses, a word like justice or freedom or reform, and you just repeat it over and over and over again. You apply it to everything until it just becomes meaningless noise. You drain the word of all its power by turning it into an empty buzzword. So here's the most important point. These tools are almost never used by themselves. They're layered. They're combined into these really sophisticated strategies. Let's take a look at how they might all come together in something like a coordinated smear campaign. And this slide just lays out the playbook perfectly. Look at how the offensive and the defensive tools work in tandem. It starts with scapegoating, you pick a target, then comes the attack using repetition to hammer home a big lie. To make it all look legit, they'll use misused statistics as proof, and then finally, if anyone dares to challenge it, they throw up defensive shields of whataboutism to deflect the criticism and attack the critic. It's a powerful self reinforcing cycle of disinformation. Seeing all of this laid out like that, yeah, it can feel a little disheartening. But listen, the goal here isn't to make you cynical or paranoid, it's to make you resilient. The goal is empowerment. Just being able to identify and name these techniques, that's the first and most crucial step to taking away their power over you. The moment you can look at an argument and say, ah, that's what aboutism, or, wait, they're using the transfer technique there, you break the spell. It lets you take a step back, evaluate the message on its own merits, and just think more clearly. So we'll leave you with this thought. Knowing these techniques, it gives you a defensive shield against manipulation for sure, but it also gives you a much deeper understanding of how communication actually works. So the real question is, once you can see the architecture of these arguments, how can you use that knowledge to build more honest, more constructive, and clearer conversations? Speaker 1: You ever get that feeling that there's some kind of hidden script out there? One that's designed to turn us against each other? Well, we're not just pulling back the curtain on this division playbook. We're going to show you exactly how it works page by page. I mean, really think about it. It's a feeling a lot of us have. Right? The disagreements you have, maybe with neighbors or people at work, even your own family. They just feel bigger somehow, amplified, almost engineered, like some invisible force is shoving us all into opposite corners making it almost impossible to find any common ground. And here's the thing you have to understand, that feeling isn't just in your head. Division isn't some bug in the system. It's a feature. It's a calculated, deliberate strategy used by people who actually benefit when we're all confused and angry. Today, we're exposing those tactics. Alright. So let's get into it. Chapter one of the playbook is all about twisting your perception of reality. Because think about it. If you can control what people believe is real, you can pretty much control them. This is all about poisoning the well of information itself. It all starts with the most basic tool in the shed, disinformation. Now we're not talking about a simple mistake or a rumor that gets out of hand, no. This is the intentional creation and spread of lies, like a fake social media post about some new community policy that's totally made up designed for one reason, to spark outrage and distrust before anyone even has a chance to check the facts. See, the real goal isn't just to make you believe a lie, it's to make you doubt what's actually true. And that doubt, it leads right into the next play, FUD, fear, uncertainty, and doubt. The whole point here isn't to convince you of their side of the story, it's to paralyze you. It's done by spreading whispers that, you know, a new technology might have weird side effects or that a political candidate has a questionable past, all without a shred of proof. It just floods your brain with what ifs, making it pretty much impossible to trust anything or anyone. Now take that FUD tactic and just supercharge it for the Internet age. What you get is something called the fire hose of falsehood. This is a tactic of pure overwhelm. It's not about crafting one really believable lie. It's about blasting out so many contradictions and crazy things that your brain's critical thinking just short targets. And this just nails how it works. You've got a massive, high volume of junk information. It's a multi platform, so it's hitting you from every angle, social media, fake news sites, everywhere. It's rapid, it never stops. And here's the key. There is zero commitment to truth or consistency. The goal is just to exhaust you, not persuade you. It wears you down until you just give up trying to figure out what's real. The final move in poisoning reality is to just change the words we use. It's called euphemism. I mean, look at this. Civilian deaths sounds awful. Right? But the sterile corporate sounding collateral damage, not so bad. Silencing dissent becomes aggressive criticism. It's all about putting a soft, fuzzy glove on a really ugly reality. Okay. So once reality is all blurred and confusing, the playbook moves on to hijacking your feelings. You can argue with logic, but raw emotion, that is a much, much more powerful driver of human behavior. This next chapter is all about how they twist your heart, not just the facts. This one. This is probably the most dangerous play in this whole chapter. It's the huge difference between saying, I disagree with their economic plan and calling them evil monsters who want to destroy our way of life. The moment you demonize an opponent, you're not just arguing anymore. You're creating a moral justification for doing anything to stop them. What's so fascinating here is how this tactic contrasts with the last one. See, manipulation isn't just about fear and hate. It can also be about creating these artificial highs. Think about a leader who's facing, say, terrible economic news and then suddenly throws a massive week long national festival. It's totally manufactured bliss designed to make people feel so good they don't notice the massive problems bubbling just under the surface. Ah, and here's an emotional trigger that is just incredibly effective. You wrap a policy or some kind of action in the flag. By doing that, any criticism of that action suddenly becomes criticism of the country itself. And just like that, a simple policy debate gets framed as, are you with us or are you a traitor? It is a wickedly powerful way to shut down any and all dissent. And this one, this is the long game, demoralization. It's this slow grinding campaign to convince an entire population that their institutions are corrupt, that their values are totally meaningless, and that things like voting just don't matter. The end goal, to make people so hopeless and cynical that they truly believe nothing they do will ever make a difference. And a demoralized people, well, they won't fight back. So you've poisoned reality. You've hijacked emotions. What's the final chapter? Well, it's about locking down power and making sure nobody can ever challenge you. These are the endgame moves. This is literally the oldest trick in the book, and for good reason. It works like a charm. A united population is a threat to power. So what do you do? You break them into little squabbling factions. A classic example is a commander who plays up small rivalries between departments to keep them competing with each other instead of, you know, uniting to ask for better pay. They're way too busy fighting each other to notice who's really pulling the strings. And honestly, this slide says it all, doesn't it? The whole goal is to take something that's unified and just create distance, to wedge suspicion and conflict into places where there used to be solidarity. It is at its core about breaking bonds between people. This is just a raw, unfiltered show of force. A diktat isn't a negotiation. It's not a compromise. It's a declaration. Imagine after a big dispute, one side just presents a list of nonnegotiable terms designed to humiliate the other side. It's one party saying, here are the terms. We're not discussing it. It makes it crystal clear who's in charge. And finally, for anyone who still dares to speak up, there's FLAC. This is a coordinated storm of criticism, personal attacks, and harassment. For example, a scientist who publishes a study that's inconvenient for a powerful industry might suddenly find themselves swarmed by an online mob attacking their character, their credentials, everything. The goal is to make the personal cost of speaking out so high that most people decide it's just safer to stay quiet. So that's the playbook. It's a lot. I know. It's heavy stuff. But understanding these tactics isn't about becoming cynical or paranoid. It's actually about becoming immune. It's about seeing the game for what it is. When you boil it all down, this is the end result thereafter. Poisoning reality is meant to make you confused. Attacking your emotions is meant to make you reactive and irrational. In all those power plays, they're designed to leave you feeling completely and utterly powerless. Confusion, emotion, powerlessness, that's the state they want you in. But here it is. This is the antidote. This is the whole point of this explainer. The moment you can put a name to a tactic, oh, that's disinformation or that's FUD or wow, they're demonizing them, it loses its invisible power over you. You can suddenly see the gears turning. And we're gonna pull back the curtain on some of the most subtle and honestly some of the most common techniques of logical manipulation. These are the kinds of tools that get used everywhere from ads to news headlines, even in arguments with family, all designed to win a debate without actually having a solid point. You know that feeling, right? I mean, you walk in with all the facts on your side, your argument feels totally rock solid, but somehow you walk away feeling confused, maybe a little outmaneuvered, and you might even start to doubt yourself. It's maddening. Well, here's the thing. It's probably because you were playing a totally different game than your opponent. You were trying to have an honest debate, but they were playing to win using a set of rules you didn't even know existed. So today, we're gonna learn the rules of their game so you can spot it from a mile away. Okay. First up, let's talk about the really subtle forms of manipulation. These are the techniques that are so tricky because they don't use outright lies. Instead, they just bend your perception of reality, kind of guiding you to a conclusion without you even noticing. A big one is called framing. And honestly, the best way to think about it is like this. It's like choosing a very specific window to look through. Now the view you see is real, but the frame itself decides what you see and maybe more importantly what you don't see. It sets the terms of the debate before a single word is even spoken. And you can see just how powerful this is. I mean, is it a public safety initiative or is it mass surveillance? Is it tax relief or is it tax cuts for the wealthy? See, the words chosen here are way more than just labels. They're entire arguments packed into a couple of words designed to get an emotional reaction from you before you've had a chance to even think about the facts. Okay. The half truth. This one is so, so deceptive because it's really hard to argue with. The statement itself is technically true, which means if you try to challenge it directly, you're the one who looks like you don't know what you're talking about. The real poison is in what's being left out. This is the perfect example. Right? 50% less fat. I mean, that sounds fantastic, but the real question you have to ask is less fat than what? Than another snack or like this example, than a stick of butter? That missing piece of context isn't some small detail. It's the whole story. Now this next one is a deeply personal and, frankly, destructive tactic. The entire goal of gaslighting is to just slowly chip away at your confidence in your own mind, in your own memories, making you feel like you have to depend on the manipulator to know what's real. It's all about control. And this is such a classic line. It's so insidious because it does two things at once. First, it dismisses your feelings. They're not valid. You're just overly sensitive. And second, it rewrites history, making you think your own memory is broken. It's a really powerful way to grab control of a conversation. Alright. Next up, we have a classic sales and persuasion technique called the foot in the door. It works on a really simple principle of human psychology, getting someone to say yes to something really small and easy. Because once we say yes once, we wanna be consistent. So we're way more likely to say yes to the next bigger thing. And here's exactly how it plays out. The small ask, hey, can you sign this online petition? It costs you nothing. It's super easy. But the moment you sign it, you've psychologically committed. You're not just a random person anymore. You're a supporter of the cause. So when that big ass comes later for a $100 and your whole weekend, it feels a lot harder to say no. And you know, this whole family of tactics has a few other cousins. You've got guilt by association where you just link an idea to a group people already dislike. Then there's labeling, just slap a word like extremist on someone so you don't have to deal with their argument. And latitudes of acceptance, That's the slow, steady process of making a crazy idea seem normal over time. They all do the same thing. Rig the game before it even starts. Okay. Let's shift gears. We're moving into our second category now, tactics that are way less about subtle manipulation and way more about just brute force. The goal here isn't to convince you, it's to exhaust you, to confuse you, and in the end, just shut you down. So first up is the Gish gallop. You can think of this as the debate version of a fire hose. The whole point isn't to be accurate or right, it's just to be fast. The person just fires off a dozen different claims, knowing that it takes way, way longer to disprove a bad argument than it does to just make one up. And it feels something like this. They'll just hit you with, well, what about the treaty from '87 and all the economic data is wrong and you completely ignored the ethical problems, and last year's report says something else, and what about the effects on trade, and my expert says you're wrong, and you never even address the footnote on page 42. See? By the time you pick even one of those to respond to, they just move on, and it looks like you couldn't answer all the other points. This is a pretty similar idea, but instead of arguments, it uses data. It's basically a smokescreen of complexity. They'll bury you in hundreds of pages of reports and spreadsheets, making the whole topic seem so incredibly complicated that you just give up and trust whatever summary they give you. And this is the classic move right here. It's an impossible chore that's disguised as a good faith offer. The sheer volume of the data becomes a weapon. It's a wall designed to shut down any real discussion and just make them look like the authority. Now let's look at a tactic that works by being empty instead of full. Glittering generalities are all about using these big emotionally appealing words that everyone loves but that nobody can really pin down. They feel great but they're basically weightless. I mean, think about it. Who is against hope or justice or a better way? Nobody. Right? And that's the point. These words are like a blank screen and we project all of our own desires onto them. The speaker doesn't need a real plan. They just need a powerful vulg word that you can fill with your own meaning. So we've seen how reality can be framed and how debates can be totally overwhelmed. So the big question now is what do we actually do about it? How can we defend ourselves against this stuff and pull the conversation back to something more honest? Here's the most important thing to remember. Every single one of these techniques has the same goal. They are all shortcuts. They are tricks designed to get around having a real good faith argument based on facts and logic. They manipulate. They overwhelm. They exploit emotions. Anything to avoid an honest debate. And that brings us to your most powerful tool, just being able to spot the tactic. The second you see what they're doing, you can name it. Now you don't have to literally yell, that's a Gish Gallop at someone. You can just calmly say, woah, that's a lot of different points at once. Can we just focus on the first one for a second? Or that's one way to frame it. Can we maybe look at it from this angle too? By simply showing you see the game, you can choose not to play it, and gently guide things back to the actual facts. Learning this stuff is not about becoming more cynical or getting into more fights. It's about becoming a clearer thinker. It gives you the tools to demand better conversations from other people and, hey, from yourself too. Speaker 0: We're cracking open the secret playbook used to build the very narratives that shape our world. And you're not wrong to feel that way. You see, powerful stories, they're almost never an accident. So let's dive right in and see how they're actually built starting from page one chapter one. Yeah. These narratives are put together with some serious precision. They're architected really, built piece by piece using a very specific set of tools, all designed to influence how you think, how you feel, and ultimately how you act. Alright. First up, let's get into the architect's playbook itself. This is the blueprint, you know, the master plan for building belief from absolute scratch. So the very first move in this playbook, it's all about controlling the playing field. Think of it like this, it's about drawing the map of reality for everyone else and setting the boundaries of the conversation before anyone else even gets a chance to speak. And the first tool they use is something called agenda setting. It's wow. It's incredibly subtle but so so powerful. By just highlighting certain issues while totally ignoring others, they get to define what you think is important. They're literally drawing your map of reality by deciding which landmarks even show up. Okay. So if agenda setting is all about carefully drawing the map, the big lie, well, just drops a brand new impossible to miss landmark right in the middle of it. And the reason this technique works is just its sheer audacity. I mean, the lie is so huge, so completely reality bending that our brains kind of short circuit. We just think, no way. Surely no one would have the guts to make up something that big. In this comparison, it just perfectly shows the two sides of controlling the playing field, doesn't it? Agenda setting, that's all about directing your focus. It's a gentle guide for your attention. But the big lie, that's about dictating belief. It flat out tells you what to see. So one manages the conversation and the other one, it just invents the topic out of thin air. Okay. Let's move on to the next chapter in the playbook. Once the stage is set, the game changes. The next step is to just completely bypass our logical, rational minds and go straight for something way more powerful, our primal emotions and our social wiring. First up is the appeal to fear. And let me tell you, this is one of the oldest tricks in the book for a reason. By showing you something scary, it completely hijacks your brain's threat detection system. Suddenly, logic is just gone, and that primal need for safety totally takes over. And when that happens, we're way more likely to accept solutions we would normally question. It's all about making you feel something before you even get a chance to think. Now this next one, it's kind of like a shortcut. Instead of trying to create a new feeling from scratch, it just taps into biases that are already there. You see, by framing a new idea so that it confirms a prejudice someone already has, the narrative just feels well instantly familiar and even more dangerously it feels intuitively true all because it's validating a belief they already hold deep down. So after hacking our individual emotions, know, or prejudice, the playbook shifts gears. The focus moves from targeting you and me as individuals to targeting our deepest social instinct. And what's that? It's that fundamental human need to belong. And this brings us to the classic bandwagon effect. You've definitely seen this one. It's all about creating the impression that everybody is doing it, that a belief is already the majority opinion. This totally exploits our deep seated fear of being the odd one out, you know, of being left out of the group, and that pressure to just conform, it can be absolutely immense. But then there's inevitable victory, which takes this whole thing a step further. It's not just saying, hey, everyone's doing this right now. No. It's saying this movement is the future. It's on an unstoppable march forward, And that tactic? Wow. It makes you feel like if you don't jump on board, you're not just gonna be left out of the group, you're gonna be left behind by history itself. Talk about pressure. Do you see the difference there? It's subtle, but it's absolutely crucial. Join the crowd is all about social pressure in the present, right now. Inevitable victory is about historical pressure from the future. But at the end of the day, they're both preying on the same desire we all have, to be on the winning side. They just play with different timelines. Okay. So the stage is set, emotions are running high, but a powerful narrative still needs a compelling cast of characters. Because let's be honest, who delivers the message is often just as important, if not more important than the message itself. And to make sure that message really sticks, the playbook rolls out three main character types or archetypes. Each one is designed to build a very specific kind of connection with you, the audience. We're talking trust, desire, or in some cases outright devotion. So first up, we have the plain folk character. This is the person who's presented as just an average Joe, a regular citizen, just like you and me. The whole goal here is to build trust, to create this sense of a shared identity. They want you to think, hey, they're one of us, even when behind the scenes, they might be representing some really powerful elite interests. Next, we've got the beautiful people archetype. This one's pretty straightforward. The technique is to associate a cause with really attractive, successful, or famous people. It taps right into our aspirations. We see these folks we admire and the message whether we realize it or not is pretty clear. Hey, if you want to be successful and desirable like them, you should probably believe what they believe. And that brings us to the final and maybe the most powerful character, the leader at the center of a cult of personality. Now this leader isn't someone you're supposed to relate to or even just aspire to be like. Oh, no. They are elevated to this heroic, almost godlike status. The goal here is to create a figure who is completely beyond criticism, someone you worship, not someone you question. And you'll hear language that sounds exactly like this. This kind of over the top unquestioning flattery, it isn't just praise. It's a tool. It's used to put that leader up on a pedestal so high that any kind of criticism, any question at all feels like an attack on the savior themself. So the big question is, how does all of this stuff, the controlled reality, the emotional triggers, the social pressure, these larger than life characters, how does it all come together and actually, you know, stick in our minds for the long haul? Well, are some deeper methods working in the background, almost like a psychological glue. You've got techniques like classical conditioning. That's where you repeatedly link a symbol with an emotion until you can't separate the two. And then there's exploiting cognitive dissonance, where a specific belief is offered up as the only way to solve some kind of painful mental conflict you're having. These are the things that really cement the narrative over time. So when you really strip it all down, the playbook is, well, it's pretty straightforward, isn't it? Step one, control the reality. Step two, trigger the emotions. Step three, build the crowd. And the final step, anoint a hero to lead the whole show. Look, knowing these plays, it doesn't have to make you cynical.
Saved - March 4, 2026 at 2:27 AM

@idropFbombs - 𝒦𝑒𝓁𝓁𝓎࿎☽

Microchips, RNA and human cloning in a 2002-2003 elementary school yearbook..😱 They have been programming us for a MINIMUM of 20 years! https://t.co/TfHiOfBI6n

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 recalls yearbook content from 2002-2003, including a center section with art, pop culture, and science. The key point shared is an item titled chipping in, describing Verichip as a microchip containing personal identification information injected under the skin, virtually undetectable, and usable for financial and transportation security, building access, as well as military and government security purposes. The segment also notes RNA has its day and mentions a federal bill banning all forms of human cloning, including efforts used for promising stem cell research. The speaker uses this example to illustrate a view that we have been conditioned for at least twenty years to accept a chip that would enable buying and selling, alongside concerns about human cloning and DNA manipulation. A lighter blurb follows about technology: Instant photo, with a phone camera that can capture up to eight seconds of video, and email images to anyone from just about anywhere, such as showing a photo of the Statue of Liberty to “mom.” The speaker argues this technology is addictive and that people have been programmed for a long time. They point to widespread smartphone addiction and the emergence of payment methods like Apple Pay, suggesting that some places already swipe hands for paying or building access, and predicting it will become large-scale. The speaker asserts that it will reach a point where one “won’t be able to buy or sell without it,” equating this to the mark of the beast.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, then we have me there with my name in missus Reker's class, fourth, fifth grade. There's the front of my yearbook, 2002, 2003. So I was about nine or 10 depending on when the picture was taken. There's another picture back here with me and my great grandfather. And then we have kind of the main point, which is the center portion of this yearbook, which has all the pretty colorful pictures, the art, pop culture, scientific section of the yearbook. And the one that we wanted to share with you guys is called chipping in. Verichip, a microchip containing personal identification information, is injected under the skin, virtually undetectable. The chip may be used for financial and transportation security, building access, as well as military and government security purposes. Down here, you also have RNA has its day. And if you're like me, a federal bill banning all forms of human cloning, including efforts used for promising stem cell research, blah blah blah. So I wanted to share that with you guys because it goes to show that we've been conditioned for a minimum of twenty years into accepting this chip that's coming, which will enable us to buy and sell, as well as, you know, you have the human human cloning and the manipulation of DNA. Another little just fun blurb. Instant photo. Smile into your phone. Cell phone camera combos are here with some phones even allowing up to eight seconds of video. Wow. That's impressive. Email images to anyone from just about anywhere. Look, mom. I'm now at the Statue Of Liberty. Can be addictive. So even back then, they knew what they were doing. They've been programming us. They've been manipulating us for a very long time. And then what do you have? Everyone addicted to their phone. And, you know, people with their Apple Pay phones, it's just a matter of time before people are swiping their hands. I mean, well, I mean, some people in some areas are already swiping their hands for paying or accessing the buildings, but it's going to become large scale, and you're not going to be able to buy or sell without it just like the mark of the beast.
Saved - March 8, 2026 at 11:27 PM

@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate

Old books give the truth: but the school system is owned by the tiny hats 🎩 https://t.co/eJbxGP1e8U

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that history gets deep when examining tiny hats and slavery, claiming this was left out of history books because “the history books” are owned by “tiny hats.” They state that those who owned slaves, were slave traders and auctioneers, also owned newspapers, and played a role in creating social division. They claim it becomes interesting to uncover the exploitation of slaves and the way people were treated, noting that those who defended slavery would be exposed as supporting it, and that slave dealing was “an extremely profitable business.” They connect these ideas back to the Rothschilds, saying this is a recurring topic they have discussed, and mention Malcolm X as another figure who talked about it, urging others to look into it. Speaker 1 contends that a Black person is not antisemitic when he says that the man exploiting him in his community is white, because it is a white man who owns all the stores. They question whether it is an accident that the whites who own these stores are Jewish, and assert that if it is an accident, then the statement that “the Jew on the corner is exploiting me” is not antisemitic but merely a description of the man exploiting him.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So things get really deep when you look into the tiny hats and slavery. Yes. This was left out of the history books because guess who owns the history books? Those tiny hats over here. And when we look at who owned all the slaves and were the slave traders and the auctioneers? Tiny hats. And who owned the newspapers? Tiny hats. And then who also created the division? Oh, I think you're starting to understand it. And then you also find about the exploitation of the slaves and how they treated people. Obviously, they're not gonna tell anybody this part. And then, yeah, it also gets interesting when you find out that the tiny hats were defending that they should stay slaves. Isn't that interesting? And people would say, no. That would never happen, really. Slave dealing was an extremely profitable business. And this is where it always ties back to the Rothschilds, like I've always talked about. Even Malcolm x talked about this. People should look into this. Speaker 1: And a Negro is not antisemitic when he says that the the man who's exploiting him in his community is white because it is a white man who owns all the stores. Now is it an accident that these whites who own these stores are Jewish? If it's an accident, then the fact that he says the Jew on the corner is exploiting me isn't an antisemitic statement. It's just more descriptive of the man who's exploiting him.
View Full Interactive Feed