reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@blackhawkce457 - J Hans
Are you living a life of quiet desperation? https://t.co/84RTdmD5kD
Video Transcript AI Summary
Most men live lives of quiet desperation due to bills and commitments. Financial obligations like rent, car payments, and feeding a family can trap people in a cycle of monotony. Opportunities for change are more abundant when one is young and free from responsibilities. However, as responsibilities accumulate, taking the safe path often leads to feeling stuck and unfulfilled. Making a change requires careful planning, saving money, and dedicating all waking hours to plotting an escape from a dissatisfying job. It is crucial to acknowledge the mistakes that led to being stuck and approach the situation with a sense of urgency and determination.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Most men live lives of quiet desperation. It's one of my favorite quotes ever because it's true. It's true. And I've been that guy. Oh my god.
You just you're just in this world where you just can't wait to just run away.
Speaker 1: And how do people get stuck there?
Speaker 0: Bills.
Speaker 1: Bills. Like financial bills?
Speaker 0: Mhmm. Yeah. Bills and commitment. You you have an apartment you have to pay for. You have a car you leased.
You have a wife that you have to feed. You have a child you have to raise. You have to you have your mortgage. You have your this. You have your that.
And that's where it all comes from.
Speaker 1: Where do you think opportunity plays into that?
Speaker 0: Well, the opportunity takes place usually when you're young and you don't have any responsibility. That that's when you have your options. Well, your options are really limited the more you gather Right. Responsibilities. You have to take a path that's dangerous.
And most people wanna take the safe path. The safe path leaves you stuck in quiet desperation almost every time. It's hell. Selling insurance or some other shit that you care zero about.
Speaker 1: But can people just make that change? I mean, look. I believe they can.
Speaker 0: But you have to plan it out. The way change is you have to put aside enough money to give yourself a window, and then you have to have a plan, and you have to spend all your waking hours outside of whatever shit job you do planning your escape. And you have to come to the realization very clearly that you fucked up and you got yourself stuck. So whatever you're doing, you have to do it like your life depends on it.
@Lucky_Shitt - Lucky Shitt ॐ 🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️🏴☠️
Imagine knowing your time is done https://t.co/dUDhFAq7gK
@DiedSuddenly_ - DiedSuddenly
Never forget https://t.co/2YZYkMX3FZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
I missed Cotton-Eyed Joe, who can really dance. He went away.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Where did you come from cutting our dough? Did I miss Cottona Joe? I've been married long time ago. Where did you come from? Where did you go?
Where did you come from cutting our Wow. You can really dance. Wow. You can really dance. He went he went.
They said we
@Red5djedi - Red5
NEVER. FORGET. https://t.co/mZQq9fx2YK
Video Transcript AI Summary
After the September 11 attacks, rumors circulated about Middle Eastern men seen near New York City. Speculation arose about possible Israeli espionage on US soil.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the days after the September attacks, there were countless rumors about strange coincidences surrounding the events. 1 report about a group of Middle Eastern men spotted the morning of September 11th parked just across the river from New York City has not gone away. Investigation of their presence has led to questions about whether Israel was conducting espionage on US soil. They lied. They
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
THEY DON’T WANT YOU ALIVE! DON’T LET THEM WIN! https://t.co/upXLJI9yB5
Video Transcript AI Summary
This video discusses the promotion of euthanasia as a way to save money and harvest organs for the rich. The speaker claims that euthanasia is being used to kill disabled children, mentally ill individuals, and reduce spending on caring for the poor and disabled. They argue that euthanasia is not painless and that there are no standardized methods, leading to distressing deaths. The speaker also mentions cases of euthanasia being offered to those who are not terminally ill, including children as young as 12. They suggest that the push for euthanasia is driven by a desire to reduce the global population and save money on pensions. The video concludes by urging viewers to share the information and fight against the lies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is the scariest video you'll ever watch. You probably won't see or read any of this anywhere else. And as usual, it's all true. I'm gonna tell you how they're gonna persuade you to kill yourself and if they don't succeed in getting you to do that, to commit suicide, then I'm gonna tell you how are they going to kill you. This is scary.
It's taken me weeks to put this together, and I still find it disturbing. It's April 2024. Welcome to video 335, all since March 2020. I said in my last video that I was taking a break, but I meant it. However, something else has come along that I've got to warn you about.
Euthanasia, suicide by doctor. Euthanasia is being promoted as offering dignity and control, but in a growing number countries around the world, the same lies are being told and everything you think you know about euthanasia is almost certainly wrong. Euthanasia is about saving money, collecting organs for the super rich, killing disabled children, killing the mentally ill, and reducing the money spent on caring for the poor and the disabled and patients in pain. Euthanasia isn't painless and it's all about saving money and harvesting organs for the rich. You think I'm exaggerating?
Well, they killed one man because he was deaf. They've already killed people who were poor and they've killed people who try to change their minds. Euthanasia victims have died screaming, struggling to live. They'll kill children who say they want to die without their parents permission. Euthanasia victims are listed in the official statistics according to whatever disease they had last.
So someone with diabetes who's euthanized will have died of diabetes and not of euthanasia. This is the same trick they used to pretend that COVID was killing 1,000,000. Remember, early in 2020, I pointed out that the rules and the PCR test allowed the authorities to label patients as COVID deaths when they'd actually been run over by a bus or killed by an axe wielding madman. They won't let me tell you about this on YouTube, on Facebook, on LinkedIn, on Twitter, or anywhere else, except here on my bit channel and on my website wwwvernoncoleman.com. I'm banned from every other form of media there is.
Joe Biden's White House even tried to get one of my books banned. No one was allowed to report that. Today, is already legal in Belgium, Canada, Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Spain, Colombia, and parts of Australia, as well as in Switzerland canadian man who was facing a adapting her home to her needs. A Canadian man who was facing eviction from social housing was accepted onto the country's euthanasia program. A woman was accused of selfishness when she wouldn't allow them to kill her disabled but life loving daughter.
For nearly 60 years, I've chronicled the deceits of the medical profession and the drug industry. In February March 2020, I warned that there was no pandemic, just the flu with better than average marketing. I warned that old people would be targeted, which they were. I also warned about the vaccine that was coming and that would be as compulsory as they could make it. That was many months before there was a COVID vaccine, which was, of course, as predicted, just another part of an ongoing program of corruption, deceit, and killing.
I was the 1st in the world to reveal the side effects of the COVID vaccine. Now they are ready for the next stage, death by doctor. This is what the conspirators have been working towards for decades. They're preparing to turn the world into 1 big Jones town. Euthanasia or death by doctor is the most evil cold blooded massacre since Genghis Khan made genocide fashionable.
They're planning to kill children without telling their parents. They're planning to kill anyone who can't look after themselves. They're planning to kill anyone classified as disabled, and in case you haven't noticed, they've been busy expanding the list of people who are now officially classified as disabled. They're planning to get rid of hospices and to abandon palliative care because it's much quicker and cheaper to kill people than to care for them. Forget the self serving myth that euthanasia is painless and dignified.
There are no standardized methods for euthanasia, and so as a result, there are frequent cases of prolonged and distressing deaths. Patients being euthanized vomit, wake up from comas, and can take up to 7 days to die. No one knows what to do if if an initial attempt at euthanasia fails. What should be done if a patient is left semi conscious? Should another attempt be made to kill them?
The same drugs which are used for killing prisoners on death row are sometimes used to kill patients who've consented to euthanasia, but if paralyzing drugs are used, the patient appears calm peaceful and quiet, but that doesn't tell us what the patient is experiencing. And unlike with prisoners, monitors are not used when a patient's being killed. This means that there is no evidence about what's happening, and experts fear that patients being killed may suffer intolerable, unbearable physical, or psychological pain. The relatives of a woman in her thirties heard screams when she was supposedly being euthanized, and the woman was suffocated with a pillow pillow after drugs failed to kill her. An elderly, demented woman in Belgium was euthanized after her family decided that she should be killed.
The doctor laced her coffee with her sedatives while she was chatting with her family. The doctor then gave another sedative by injection, and the woman stood up. Family members held her down while the doctor injected her and killed her. Judges declared that the doctor did not need to verify her wish for euthanasia. In his new book, Jack King reports that complications which been recorded during euthanasia include vomiting, tachycardia, sweating, gasping, and many others.
One patient became unconscious 25 minutes after swallowing the lethal medication, but woke up and regained consciousness 65 hours later. Cases. A woman needed a wheelchair ramp in her home. Her caseworker offered her a medically assisted death instead. A student went to hospital to for help with her debilitating feelings of depression and hopelessness.
The staff member she saw told her that psychiatrists were in short supply. Have you considered euthanasia? She was asked. A hospital spokesman said that the hospital had followed protocols. A 61 year old woman suffered from depression after a concussion sustained in a car crash.
She was offered and accepted death by doctor as an alternative to treatment. A 61 year old Canadian was killed by a lethal injection in 2019. His health problem was hearing loss. No medical personnel contacted his relatives out of respect for patient confidentiality. A man with a degenerative bright brain disorder was offered euthanasia so often that he began recording if he if he had an interest in assisted dying.
A woman took her daughter to a hospital emergency room. Unprompted, the doctor informed the woman that her 20 5 year old daughter who had cerebral palsy and spina bifida was a good candidate for euthanasia. When the mother said no, the doctor called the mother selfish. Euthanasia is being offered to the mentally ill since there's now a major global epidemic of mental illness in general misery, this is a perfect background for selling euthanasia, and they're killing children. Naturally, the world being what it is these days, the authorities will not tell the parents of those children what's being planned.
The parents will only know after the event. They'll get an email. You may have noticed that your 12 year old son did not come home from school today. This is because he enrolled in our suicide for students program, and we helped him to kill himself this afternoon. How many children, and particularly teenagers, do not sometimes wish they were dead?
My boyfriend's broken up with me. I wish I were dead. I've been bullied on Facebook so much. I wish I were dead. No problem.
Here at the Justin Trudeau, let's kill the children's center, we can deal with that for you. Like mister Trudeau himself, it'll just be a little prick. Just put your satchel and your lollipop down, lie down, and your problems are over forever. We'll ring your mom and dad later and tell them that you won't be coming home. They can collect your body from the Justin Trudeau morgue.
The incidence of state sanctions suicide is sore soaring, though, as I've explained, they fiddle the figures. Millions of younger people have been encouraged to regard every moment of temporary unhappiness or disappointment as a sign of serious mental disorder. Doctors in the UK are now writing nearly 500,000 prescriptions for powerful, largely, unsuitable antidepressant drugs to be given to children. This is a perfect background for selling euthanasia. The media has created fear and sadness and a sense of powerlessness and worthlessness.
They've created the concept of a life not worth living. Is it really a coincidence that the subject of euthanasia is being promoted heavily by the media and by politicians at the same time as fear levels are at their highest for a very long time. And physical disabilities now merit euthanasia too. Back in 2010, the British government quietly changed the legal definition of disability. Lots of people thought this was kind of them.
You're now automatically classified as disabled, and therefore likely to be a suitable candidate for euthanasia if you have, among other things, visual impairment, physical or mental impairment, difficulty in communicating with other people, difficulty in filling in forms, difficulty in preparing and eating food, difficulty in sitting down or standing up, difficulty in using a computer, difficulty in getting washed and dressed, difficulty in following instructions, long COVID, even though it doesn't exist, menopause, ADHD, autism, dyslexia. Millions welcome the change. The disabled can be permanently off work and receive benefits, but disabled people are candidates now for euthanasia whether or not they're willing to be killed. Campaigners speak on behalf of the disabled and have said for decades that there's the the legalization of assisted suicide would lead to society devaluing the lives of people who are disabled or elderly. The usually unspoken fear was that patients would be made to feel guilty if they didn't kill themselves or allowed themselves to be killed, and it's happening.
Birth is seen as a viable alternative to costly and inevitably futile medical treatment. A paper in Canada concluded that medically assisted death could dramatically reduce annual health spending. Vulnerable people will be killed, all be expected to to do our captain Oates to save money and resources. 1 third of those taking part in Canada's euthanasia program perceive themselves to be a burden on their family, their friends, and their caregivers. Many worried about the amount of money that was being spent on caring for them.
Unsurprisingly, euthanasia is rapidly becoming one of Canada's fastest growing causes of death. A woman who is living on disability payments and who'd failed to obtain affordable housing ended her life under Canada's assisted suicide laws. The government sees me as expendable trash, she said before she died. Canada's supreme court ruled that the previous law, which excluded people with disabilities from the death by doctor scheme, was unconstitutional. How nice of them.
Amazingly, 27% of Canadians believe that euthanasia should be expanded to include people who aren't ill but are poor, and twenty 8% of Canadians would offer death by doctor to the homeless. Euthanasia was supposed to be offered only to people who were terminally ill, but who knows what's incurable and what isn't? A cure may be just around the corner, the patient's problem may disappear without treatment, the diagnosis might be wrong, the doctor may not be aware that a cure is available, an available cure may seem too expensive. I've known patients diagnosed having weeks to live who were still alive a decade later. With mental health problems, the worries are even greater, but there won't be a chance for a better day.
The sensitive and the vulnerable will be dead. The elderly are being killed off first, of course, being made to feel guilty if they don't submit to euthanasia. Conditioning, propaganda, and predictive programming are all being used to promote the idea that older citizens have a duty to die when they reach 70 years of age. Youth enthusiasts like to claim that doctor assisted suicide is essential because people are living longer, and as a result, the global population of elderly people is growing out of proportion. The only sensible thing to do, the argument goes, is to kill off the excess old people to preserve space and resources for the young.
As I first explained back in the seventies, 19 seventies, that's a myth. Improved sanitation facilities and better drinking water supplies meant that the number of babies dying and the number of women dying in childbirth fell dramatically at the end of 19th century and the start of the 20th century. That's what has result in a bigger population and more old people. Life expectation for adults has not risen appreciably during the last century. Take a look at my book, how to live longer, for the proof.
So why are so many countries legalizing death by doctor? One reason is that a bunch of conspirators claim that it's necessary to reduce the size of the global population. They want to cut the world's population down to 500,000,000. There's plenty of food to feed billions more, but much of the food's in the wrong place at the wrong time, of course. The conspirators have 2 fundamental policies, end global poverty by killing all the poor people, and end disease by killing all the sick.
You have to follow the money if you want to find the truth. The disabled and the elderly are now widely regarded as of little or no financial value. And then, there are pensions, of course. Many of those who receive state pensions believe quite erroneously that the money they've paid in taxes has been put aside to pay their pensions, but pensions programs are simply huge ponzi schemes. State pensions are paid out of today's taxes.
In 20 years time, pensions will be paid out of the taxes which are paid by workers in 20 years' time. If the size of the aged population can be cut, the annual savings will be measured in 1,000,000,000 of dollars. After 1,000 of elderly people were murdered in hospitals and care homes during the lock downs. Remember, I called it murder at the time. Politicians boasted with glee that the financial savings in unpaid pensions would be huge.
The more people they kill, the more money they'll save. The pro euthanasia programs, nothing to do with reducing pain or stress. It's all about saving money. It's a lot cheaper to kill people than it is to provide palliative care. Take a look at what's happening in Holland.
The advocates of kill by doctor in Holland don't like to use the word kill, of course, they much prefer anodyne phrases such as physician assisted suicide or aid in dying. You can call it medically assisted suicide or death with dignity, but don't call it killing or murder. They've mastered the art of state approved slaughter. Doctors will kill people of any age, and they'll kill people who are demented or depressed or who have long term chronic disorders. An 18 year old with psychiatric problems was killed by doctors.
They will indeed kill just about everyone. They'll even kill you if you're just tired of life. A petition signed by a number of prominent Dutch citizens has suggested that euthanasia should be available to everyone over the age of 70 who feels a bit worn out. Plans were announced for a law that will allow assisted suicide if a patient felt they had completed their life, whatever that means. It was said that the needs of older people should be met if they were struggling with mobility problems, a loss of independence, fatigue, or loneliness.
But meeting their needs shouldn't involve walking sticks, wheelchairs, dietary help, or companionship, but death by doctor. Way back in the 19 nineties, a 50 year old social worker felt so miserable she said she wanted to die, so her doctor gave her a glass of poison to drink, and she duly died. Today, they'll kill you if you're demented or have an existential problem you can't cope with. They'll kill you if you're lonely or depressed or not much use. Older patients are deprived of food, water, diagnosis, or medication, and then when they feel pretty damned uncomfortable and miserable, they're offered a death pill.
You've had a long life. Why are you hanging on when your time's up? You're using up valuable resources. And they'll kill children as young as 12. The enthusiasts promoting death by doctor in Holland now even have a euthanasia week where they can share propaganda promoting euthanasia.
Individuals can make a living will or advanced directive in which they sign up for euthanasia at some future time, but don't try to change your mind because living wills are legal documents which can't be easily rescinded. One patient fought back while doctors were giving her a kill shot. The relatives held the patient down while the needle went in. The patient was screaming as well as fighting, but courts later later cleared the doctors of any crime. And look again at what's happening to hospices and palliative care around the world.
Funding for both is disappoint disappearing. There's plenty of money for gender displacement clinics but none for hospices or palliative care. Hospices have to find 3 quarters of their funding themselves. Just imagine the outcry if, for example, infertility services or cosmetic surgery clinics relied on jumble sales, car boot sales, bucket collections, and charity shops to survive. The aim is clearly to reduce palliative care just as the availability of euthanasia is increased.
The same thing is happening all around the world. What the world desperately needs, of course, is more mobile palliative care with doctors and nurses available to visit patients who are dying and who want to stay in their own homes, but the opposite is happening. Just a few decades ago, doctors in Britain visited their patients at home during the daytime, during the evenings, at weekends, among bank holidays. Nowhere in the world was there a better 24 hour a day GP service than in Britain. Today, the average GP earns well over a100000 a year with a 50,000 vaccine bonus, who works just 25 hours a week.
Accountants and librarians work longer hours than GPs. Healthcare in Britain has been destroyed by this. There's more untreated illness and more people are suffering from chronic illnesses and suffering unnecessarily. Patients have little alternative but to call for an ambulance or visit their nearest accident and emergency hospital department. Many of these patients have problems which could be dealt with by a GP in 5 minutes, but the vastly increased pressure means that the average waiting time for an ambulance has gone in many areas from minutes to hours, and in accident and emergency departments, patients wait days to be seen.
It's now by no means exceptional for patients to die while waiting to be seen. Last year, over a 100000 people over 70 waited more than 24 hours in a and e. The result is that millions of people are on never ending waiting lists, and many never get there. Turn up in a hospital in an ambulance and sedated, and they'll offer you instant death instead of hours of pain. The same deterioration has taken place taken place around the world, and it's led to a dramatic increase in the number of people agreeing to have do not resuscitate notices placed on their medical records, and accepting euthanasia as the only viable option.
And there's one other reason why the establishment so keen on euthanasia. It will release a good many organs for use. If people are left to die naturally, naturally, their organs will deteriorate and begin to rot, but if they're killed at the right time, their organs could be harvested in good condition as they're needed. Organ donation started started out as optional and voluntary, but it's become the default position with citizens having to opt out of giving their organs possibly while they'd like to be still using them. There's no little irony in the fact that patients are being organ donors organ donors.
Doctors have been told to suggest organ donation as not if not as an incentive, but as a kind of consolation for the person's own loss of life. Since organ transplantation is extremely expensive and health services are cutting costs, it's inevitable that the organs taken from patients who've been murdered by the state will be reserved for politicians and billionaires. Euthanasia is now global. In America, death by doctors being pushed by politicians, lobbyists, and lawyers. Death by doctor has is being sold as a freedom, as a choice, as a human right.
The right to die has become the duty to die. In Oregon and Washington, well over half of requests for assisted suicide cited feelings of being a burden as significant reasons for their requests. Just how enthusiastic would anyone be if doctors simply shot their patients in the head instead of injecting them? Doctors agree that the quickest, simplest, most painless, most dignified, and cheapest way to kill people is to shoot them in the head. Or maybe gas chambers could be introduced.
They're cheap and effective and can be used to kill a number of people at a time. Suicide by doctor isn't legal yet in the UK, but the Brits have had an excellent substitute. Back in the 19 nineties, something called the Liverpool care pathway was introduced. This allowed doctors and nurses to kill anyone over 70 whom they didn't like by the simple expedient of not giving them food or water. Years ago, the Liverpool Care Pathway was put out of bounds as being unethical, painful, distressing, and wicked, but doctors and nurses still use it, and they speed it up with a kill shot of morphine and midazolam.
This was very popular during the COVID fraud and was used to hear free up whole whole hospital wards so that nurses and doctors could get on with rehearsing their TikTok dance steps. And then there are the do not resuscitated notices, which I've warned of you about many times over the years. The and our notices have been put on patient's notes without their permission and even against their wishes. Euthanasia supported by the media will be legalized in the UK very soon. Who will decide who can and should die?
Will it be patients themselves, relative, nurses, social workers, or just any old neighborly busybody? Suicide has gone from illegal to optional. How soon will euthanasia become compulsory and for whom? When euthanasia is made legal worldwide, then Pandora's box will be opened and no one will be able to close the lid. The laws are all always extended to include people who are deaf or diabetic or 16 and feeling fed up with the world.
Who's gonna be trained to help with euthanasia to do the killing? The problem, of course, is that good caring doctors and nurses are trained to keep people alive, and they'll refuse to kill their patients. Many hospices refused to have anything to do with euthanasia. This will leave patients in the hands of people who are not experts in end of life care or a pain management. Equivalent of the equivalent of the professional hangmen who used to travel around with a supply of rope.
All euthanasia will be provided by technicians who will have as little as 6 hours online training. That's the plan. I suspect that many of the people who will be attracted to work as hired killers will be psychopaths, murderers, and assassins who will enjoy killing people. Remember that the vast majority of people who, for whatever reason, attempt to commit suicide and fail, later give thanks that they've failed with death by doctor. That possibility is lost.
Can doctors bring up the subject of assisted death without influencing their patients or frightening them? Is it really a doctor's job to offer to kill their patient? If you want to know more about how they're gonna kill us, please read a new book called they want to kill us it's written by Jack King it's the only truly honest account of their evil plan that I've ever read and I bought copies to give away please do the same there's a link to the book in the box below and please please share this video as widely as you can. Discussing euthanasia would make a great television or radio debate, of course, but the authorities will never allow a proper debate just as they'll never allow a debate about vaccination or the COVID fraud. Unless you share this video or distribute copies of Jack King's book, then I've wasted my time.
Mankind is lost, and we're all finished. It's as simple as that. This video is not monetized and nor is my website. Please remember, you are not alone. More and more people are waking up, and once they're awake, they don't go back to sleep.
Distrust the government, avoid mass media, and fight the lies. And thank you for watching, an old man in a chair. I'm old. My eyes are going. I have difficulty using a computer, and I'm worried.
However old you are, you should be worried too.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
STOP complying START rebelling https://t.co/TLIEg1jysW
Video Transcript AI Summary
Stop giving democratically elected governments the benefit of the doubt because they have no good intentions and political elites are never concerned about the well-being of regular people. You cannot comply your way out of a tyranny; compliance only delays the inevitable.
End your silence, speak up, stop complying, and start rebelling because they're out to get you if you do not resist. Stop voting for those who inflict psychological abuse on you. To defy this unfree world, become so absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Really imploring the people and all the peoples around the world, for God's sake, stop giving your democratically elected governments the benefit of the doubt. They are not deserving of that. They are not. Stop rationalizing whatever your government is doing. Try stop rationalizing and come up with some good intentions.
They have no good intentions. Never. As I said before, in the entire history of mankind, there has never been a political elite concerned about the well-being of regular people. And it isn't any different now. Why should it stop giving them the benefit of the doubt?
Because I can tell you, you cannot comply your way out of a tyranny. It is impossible. Trying to do so, you will only feed a gigantic alligator in the hopes of being eaten last. But guess what? Your turn will come and then you will be the one swallowed up.
I also have to ask the people, end your silence. Speak up. For God's sake, stop complying. Start rebelling. They're out to get you if you do not resist.
I would also urge you to stop voting for those who inflict this psychological abuse on you, who mock you for their own good. In order to deal with this unfree world, to defy this unfree world, I have decided to become so absolutely free that my very existence is an act of rebellion. And that's what we all need to do.
@MarkAttwood - Mark Attwood
Suicide weekend incoming https://t.co/JE4ezwLgJy
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that unvaccinated individuals entering hospitals were deliberately killed. According to the speaker, every unvaccinated person they interviewed who went to the hospital reported not receiving the same treatments as vaccinated patients. Instead, they were allegedly given remdesivir, ventilation, and fentanyl, leading to their deaths.
Another speaker adds that hospitals had financial incentives to produce COVID-related deaths, allegedly receiving up to $500,000 per death in California. The first speaker agrees, stating that hospital coders and whistleblowers revealed that patients were repeatedly tested for COVID until a positive result was obtained, triggering payments. They claim hospitals received additional payments for each drug and piece of equipment used, totaling over $500,000 per person. One person allegedly said their daughter was worth more dead than alive.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: These people were going into hospital. They had not taken the COVID nineteen shot. And this is really important because every single person that sat on that bus or virtual story, I asked them the question, first of all, did you take the COVID nineteen shot? No. They did not.
And it was becoming increasingly clear that the unvaccinated, as they're called, were being targeted, and they were being killed. And the people who were speaking to me used the word murder. It seems to me, Mike, that you came into hospital, if you and the first question they asked, did you take the shot? And if they said yes, they did take the shot, they went and got different treatments. The ones who did not take the shot out of vaccinating was straight into remdesivir, ventilation, fentanyl, a cocktail of drugs, and killed on those ventilators.
That Over and over again.
Speaker 1: Okay. That that's a very strong accusation, but let me add to it that I've interviewed other guests, lawyers who have pointed out that the hospitals were financially incentivized to produce COVID related deaths because some of them received in California as much as about half a $1,000,000 per death if if someone was diagnosed with COVID beforehand. Do you think that that kind of financial incentive played a role in this flow chart that you're describing right now?
Speaker 0: A 100%. And we have coders and whistleblowers, people working inside the hospital telling us that they were just jabbing people for this COVID test, and they will keep going over and over again till they got a positive. The minute they got a positive, tick that box, that's some money. Onto the next thing, remdesivir. Big tick for that.
And they were showing us on the death medical records how much they were getting paid for every single drug and cocktail and equipment that was used on them. And it was half a make plus per person. Big money. And as one person told me, my daughter was worth more dead than alive, and they took her.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Very wise words https://t.co/5yH99l3kId
Video Transcript AI Summary
When we were younger, taxes were around 15% of earnings; now they approach 50%. Many don’t realize that business taxes are ultimately passed on to consumers as hidden costs. Tax reform is needed to simplify the system, eliminating the necessity for lawyers to navigate it. The government has become overly complex, with a large number of public employees influencing policy more than elected officials. Citizens must engage more actively in local governance. Special interest groups often overshadow businesses in policy influence. To address inflation, a balanced budget is essential, which requires discipline in spending. Legislators should propose funding alongside new spending programs to clarify costs to the public. The federal government is bloated, and significant cuts could be made. Political parties should clearly define their differences and stand firm on their values.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When you and I were boys back in the Midwest Right. Governments, federal, state, and local, were only taking about 15¢ out of every dollar earned. Today, they're taking almost half of every dollar earned in the United States. And most people don't realize it because the taxes are hidden in the so called business taxes. You know, the politician that stands up and yells, oh, let's save the little man.
Let's tax business. And everybody yells, hooray. They haven't figured out that every tax on business is just a part of the cost of production, And the customer winds up paying it when he buys the product. It's a hidden sales tax. There's a 116 of them in a the suit of clothes that each one of us is wearing.
So, Paul, there are a lot of,
Speaker 1: economists who suggested, and I don't know they'll ever come to be in this country that they're if they closed all of the loopholes and, corporations and maybe tax loopholes and even on the rich certain loopholes and and made a percentage income and made a flat fee without all of the deductions, that the government might raise as much money
Speaker 0: as they do now? Oh, sure. And really, the loopholes this has been overdone by the politicians too. The bulk of the money that is taken by what are called loopholes are the legitimate deductions with which if the people didn't have them, they couldn't pay their income tax. Interest on their mortgage, interest on the installments on their on their car, their property taxes on their home if they have one and so forth.
These are, in politicians' eyes, loopholes. But we ought to have tax reform, and we ought to start by making it so simple that you don't have to hire a lawyer to find out how much you owe every year.
Speaker 1: That's for sure. It used to be, it used to be a little simplified, but not anymore.
Speaker 0: We we, Johnny, we live in the only country in the world where it takes more brains to figure out your income tax than it does to earn the income. That'd be right. We've gotten in the habit over the last 40 years of thinking the government has the answers. There's very little that government can do as efficiently and as economically as the people can do themselves. And if government would shut the doors and sneak away for about 3 weeks, we'd never miss them.
Our biggest problem is that we have built a permanent structure of government, federal, state, and local, the permanent employees, and they've come to the place that they actually determine policy in this country more than does the Congress of the United States. Mhmm. There are 14 and a half 1000000 public employees in the United States. That's quite a voting block. And the bureaus and agencies, not in Washington, I heard you talking earlier about, some of the research programs.
What would you say if I told you about 1, a study in which this was called the the, demography of happiness. And in this study, the government found out that, young people are happier than old people. They found out that people that earn more are happier than people that earn less. And they found out that well, people are happier than 60 people. That's good.
Now life was $249,000 to find out it's better to be rich, young, and healthy than old, poor, and sick. A poll was taken recently that found out that only 46% of the people in the poll could name their United States congressman. But what was worse, 86% of those who could name him couldn't tell you a single thing that he represented or stood for.
Speaker 1: They just knew that he represented the state for the
Speaker 0: He was a congressman, but what's he doing while he's up there? And the same is true at the at the local levels of government and and all the rest. But,
Speaker 1: So you're saying people really have to take an active interest. You have to have, citizen action groups locally and,
Speaker 0: And let them know. Because
Speaker 1: they're special interest
Speaker 0: groups. Now the special interest groups are, as everyone thought, big powerful business interests or something that are going to persuade government to do things. As a matter of fact, I don't know anyone with less influence today in government than business. They're just a convenient whipping boy. But it's the groups that have got a particular ax to grind.
You can't have a power plant because it might interfere with the the seagulls. Now I think I'm an environmentalist, and I do not agree with those people way over in the edge who paved the whole country over in the name of progress. But also, I don't like those on the other extreme that won't let you build a house unless it looks like a bird's nest. Some place in the middle, we got to allow people or ecology too. Right.
Well, this kind of group, and they want their particular program. 100 of dollars have been added to the cost of an automobile putting gadgets on it to to clear up the air. We're the only country in the world that set out to do it that way. When budget deficits are what's causing inflation, I don't see that there's any room to be on either side of that argument. Yeah.
I think the answer to curing inflation is a balanced budget.
Speaker 1: Now how do you do that? I mean, it's not
Speaker 0: how do you balance the budget? Balancing the budget is like protecting You
Speaker 1: don't spend more than you take in. Right?
Speaker 0: It's like protecting your virtue. You have to learn to say no.
Speaker 1: There's gotta be another way. What what's the second option?
Speaker 0: Well, no. There's some ways that this could be brought about. First of all, that limitation. Here here's another one. Why shouldn't we have in addition to a simplified income tax, why shouldn't we also have a law that says that anytime a legislator or a congressman introduces a spending program, he has to introduce with it a tax program to pay for it?
Then let the people find out. There was a woman that, from a financial firm that was back at the president's economic council, and her words weren't quoted. Everybody else's words got in the paper, all the hellers and the gall breaths and all the so called economists. And I had a I have a degree in economics, so I can say this. I think an economist is someone who has a phi beta kappa key on one end of his watch chain and no watch on the other.
This woman said that you go to the polls and you ask the people, do they want some social service, some program that government can give, and the people in the polls are apt to read and say, hey. That sounds good. Yeah. Mhmm. But she says that isn't exactly accurate.
She says put a $100 bill in each person's hand, and then show them the program and say, now isn't that a nice program? Do you want it? Give me the $100. And she says, see what the poll says then and how many people hang on to the $100 instead of the program.
Speaker 1: In other words, if it's rather hidden, then someone doesn't know exactly where it's gonna come from.
Speaker 0: They all start all the government programs start a dollar down and we'll catch you later. And, and they they multiply all of those things that you were the office of management and budget in Washington that's responsible for the budget, putting up putting the budget together, cannot even tell you how many boards, commissions, agencies, bureaus, and departments there are in the federal government. Yeah. But all of them can pass regulations, and those regulations have the force of law. And the difference is when you break the law, you're innocent until proven guilty.
When you break a regulation, the fellow that charges you with breaking the regulation, you're guilty. Right.
Speaker 1: If
Speaker 0: you wanna take him to court and prove you're innocent, that's up to you. And, all of these are things that that, yes, we can trim the budget. There's enough fat in the federal government that if you rendered it, you could wash the world. Maybe it's time for, realignment between people who might be finding themselves in the wrong parties. Maybe there are some people still voting.
I was a democrat most of my life. I became a republican only not too many years ago. And, I had the pleasure of telling some of those people that are saying the republican party ought to broaden its base the other day that, when I switched parties, I didn't do it because the 2 parties were alike. I did it because they were different. And, I think that the 2 parties ought to stand up as to what they represent, what they stand for.
@MichelleMaxwell - Michelle Maxwell
Not scary at all 🤯 Topic:Assisted Suicide https://t.co/8B7HUCsOK1
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2016, Canada and California legalized medical assistance in dying. Despite having similar populations, California has seen only 893 cases of assisted suicide, while Canada has reported over 50,000. This stark difference raises concerns about Canada's approach, which some view as predatory. Critics argue that instead of providing palliative care, Canada is expanding eligibility for assisted dying to vulnerable groups, including children as young as 12, the mentally ill, homeless individuals, and addicts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Give you one stat to prove my point. Just one. Oh, go ahead. It's just it takes one. This is how ridiculous this is.
Okay. Ready? In 2016, Canada legalized medical assistance in dying, so did California. California has the same population as the entire country of Canada. Okay?
In that time frame, California has only made it, meaning assisted suicide, 893 people. Cool. How many do you think Canada have in Canada? I'm gonna assume it's ridiculously high. Give me a number.
Come on. Play with me here. 12,652. Over 50,000. Oh, smokes.
Canada is a predatory behavior include they're trying to include children down to the age of 12, mentally ill, homeless, and addicts instead of giving them palliative care.
@Norambu3na - Norambuena
Breaking free from the illusion https://t.co/G6FDlGckK3
Video Transcript AI Summary
This is it. Your final opportunity. Choose wisely, as there's no going back. Opt for the blue pill, and the story concludes. You'll awaken in your bed, free to live as you please, oblivious to what could have been. However, if you choose the red pill, you'll remain in wonderland, and I will reveal to you the astonishing depths of the rabbit hole.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning point. You take the blue pill, the story end, you wake up in your bed and do whatever you want to. You take the red pill, you stay in wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Wise words https://t.co/kuSuFSNEWh
Video Transcript AI Summary
Abolish the Department of Agriculture, Commerce, Education, Energy, Housing and Urban Development, and Labor. Keep the Department of Defense and Justice, and the State Department. The Treasury is necessary for tax collection. Veterans Affairs could be eliminated by paying off benefits in lump sums. The government should reduce its land ownership, retaining only what’s necessary for government buildings. The core functions of government should focus on preserving peace, defending the country, adjudicating disputes, and protecting individuals from coercion, primarily through local police.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Keep them or abolish them. Department of Agriculture. By abolish. Gone. Department of Commerce.
Abolish. Gone. Department of Defense. Keep. Keep it.
Department of Education. Abolish. Gone. Energy? Abolish.
Speaker 1: How Except as energy ties in with the military.
Speaker 0: Well, then we shove it under defense. The little bit that handles the nuclear Right.
Speaker 1: That ought to go under
Speaker 0: Plutonium and so forth goes under defense, but we abolish the rest of it. Health and human services?
Speaker 1: There is some there are there is room for some public health activities to prevent, contagion, such a thing as, for example
Speaker 0: So you'd keep the National Institutes of Health, say, and the Center for Disease Control and not involved?
Speaker 1: No. No. The National Institutes of Health. Those are mostly research agencies. No.
No. That's a question of whether the government should be involved in financing research.
Speaker 0: And the answer is no. Well, that's a complicated that's
Speaker 1: a very complicated issue, and it's not an easy answer with respect to that.
Speaker 0: We'll eliminate half of the Department of Health and Human Services. Okay, one half. There we go. Housing and Urban Development? Bound.
Oh, didn't even pause over that one. Department of the Interior.
Speaker 1: Oh, well, but the Housing and Urban Development has done an enormous amount of harm. My God, if you think of the way in which they've destroyed parts of cities under the rubric of eliminating slums, you know, you remember Martin Anderson wrote a book on the federal bulldozer describing the effect of a urban development. There have been many more dwelling units torn down in the in the name of public housing that
Speaker 0: have been built. Jack Kemp has proposed selling to the current inhabitants of public housing their unit, their townhouse, their apartment for a dollar apiece and just shifting the ownership to the people who live
Speaker 1: in If you got rid of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, it would be worth doing that.
Speaker 0: Alright. Done. That's gone. Department of the Interior, your beloved National Park Service.
Speaker 1: Well, given that the problem there is you first have to sell off all the land that the government owns, But that's what you should do.
Speaker 0: But it could be done pretty quickly. You should you should do that.
Speaker 1: There's no reason for the government to own. The government now owns something like one third of all the land in the country.
Speaker 0: And that's too much. Should go down to zero.
Speaker 1: Should go down to well, not entirely zero. They ought to own the land on which government buildings are.
Speaker 0: Okay. Terrific. Department of Justice.
Speaker 1: Oh, yes. Keep that one. Keep that one.
Speaker 0: Labor. No. Gone. State. Keep.
Keep it. Transportation. Gone. Gone. The Treasury?
Speaker 1: You have to keep it to collect taxes.
Speaker 0: Alright. Collect taxes through the Treasury. Veterans Affairs?
Speaker 1: You can regard the Veteran Affairs as a way of of paying essentially salaries for services of those who have been in the armed force, but you ought to be able to get rid of it.
Speaker 0: You should be able to
Speaker 1: by by pay it off pay it off.
Speaker 0: Pay off lump sums for
Speaker 1: that That's right.
Speaker 0: And just get rid of it. From 14 departments down to
Speaker 1: four and a half Four and a half fundamental functions. What are its fundamental functions? A pre preserve the peace, defend the country Alright. Provide a mechanism whereby individuals can adjudicate their disputes.
Speaker 0: That's the justice Justice department. Department.
Speaker 1: Protect individuals from being coerced by other individuals. The police did the function. Right. And now, this is both the central government and the state and local governments. The police function is primarily local and central.
Right. And those are the fundamental functions of government in my opinion.
@DissidentMedia - Dissident Media
Do it. https://t.co/mJgW847Byx
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes it's impossible for a plane alone to penetrate the World Trade Center towers, suggesting bombs exploded simultaneously with the plane impact. The speaker claims the building's unique construction, with steel on the outside, should have made it impenetrable.
Another speaker describes seeing the plane impact Building Number 2 and an explosion erupting from the other side almost instantly.
The first speaker reiterates the belief that the planes contained more than just fuel and were traveling at high speeds, seemingly descending into the building to gain additional momentum. The speaker emphasizes the buildings' robust steel construction and concludes that the destruction was caused by more than just the planes themselves. The speaker believes the event has fundamentally changed the country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I said, how could a plane, even a plane, even a seven sixty seven or seven forty seven or whatever it might have been, how could it possibly go through this deal? I happen to think that they had not only a plane, but they had bombs that exploded almost simultaneously because I just can't imagine anything being able to go through that wall. Most buildings are built with the steelers on the inside around the elevator shaft. This one was built from the outside, which is the strongest structure you can have, and it was almost just like a, like a can of soup.
Speaker 1: You know, Donald, we were looking at pictures all morning long of that plane coming into, Building Number 2 and when you see that, approach the the far side and then all of a sudden, within a matter of millisecond, the explosion pops out the other side. Right.
Speaker 0: I just think that there was a plane with more than just fuel. I think, obviously, they were very big planes. They were going very rapidly because I was also watching where the plane seemed to be not only going fast, it seemed to be coming down into the building. So it was getting the speed from going downhill, so to speak. It just seemed to me that to do that kind of destruction is even more than a big plane because you're talking about taking out steel, the heaviest caliber steel that was used on a building.
I mean, these buildings were rock solid. And, you know, it's just an amazing it's an amazing thing. It's this country is different today, and and it's going to be different than it ever was for many years to come.
@IanCarrollShow - Ian Carroll
Break the cycle of hate 🇺🇸 https://t.co/ufwGK8aAgV
Video Transcript AI Summary
I didn’t plan it this way, but I want to finish the main portion of the show today by taking one from Tucker’s book, as Tucker has shown impressive leadership. It is crucial that you do not start to become the very thing you are fighting against. It’s important that white people do not think white people are better than everyone else, because that would make you no better than the Israeli Jews you have a problem with for thinking they’re better than everyone else. Don’t repeat the cycles of history. We are all God’s people, created in His divine image, equal with equal rights, desires, dreams, families, and the ability to make our lives as best as we can.
Built into that is the hard-to-apply idea that there is a pattern where a group affiliated with a foreign state conducts military covert operations and psyops on our brains every day, and a lot of them are Jews. If you start doing all Jews, you restart the cycle of history, and you don’t want to give Jews ammo for another cycle. If you’re someone who thinks it’s all Jews, you’re probably someone who thinks Jews have done all these horrible things with their power and money and influence.
So don’t give them another reason to start over, because they’re clearly good at it. There’s no doubt the Crusades weren’t all Christians and the Inquisition wasn’t all Christians—there are exceptions to every rule. There are evil Muslims and there are good Muslims. There are fucked up Jews and there are good Jews. The one group with no exceptions is pedophiles; they can get fucked and fucked hard into the dirt, living or dead, it doesn’t matter to me. I hope I’m allowed to say that on YouTube.
After all the owners of YouTube did visit that island, but whatever. People will clip what they clip. It’s 2025. Be nice to people. Genuinely. Treat people with respect. Judge people as individuals for their actions. It’s not that complicated. I find Christianity a pretty good way to do it; following Christ pretty much solves it all. If you’re averse to following Christ, that’s cool. These values are universal—anyone can do it. Even you, Ben Shapiro, could figure out how to do it too. You could consider that maybe the lives of Palestinians are not worth three quarters the life of a Jew. Call me old fashioned? Call me new. It’s probably why he doesn’t want to debate. It’s probably why Ben Shapiro doesn’t want to debate Nick Fuentes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I didn't actually plan it this way, but I wanna finish the main portion of the show today, taking one from Tucker's book, as Tucker has been expressing some really impressive leadership in the space. It is so important that you do not start to become the very thing that you are trying to fight against, okay. It is so important that white people do not start to think that white people are better than everyone else. Because that wouldn't make you any better than the Israeli Jews that you have such a problem with for thinking they're better than everyone else. Okay?
Let's not repeat the fucking cycles of history, please. We are all God's people. We are all created in His divine image. We are all equal with equal rights, equal desires and hopes and dreams, equal families, equal ability to just make our lives as best we can, right? That's basic.
But built into that is this idea that is really hard to apply in principle, especially when there's this pattern going on where there is this group that is affiliated with a foreign state that is doing military covert operations, psyops, on our brains every day, and a lot of them are Jews, like they are. A lot of them are Jews. But if you start doing all Jews, you start to restart the cycle of history. And you don't wanna give the Jews ammo for another cycle of this, dude. If you're a person that thinks it's all Jews, then you're probably a person that thinks that the Jews, the Jews, have done all these horrible things with all of their incredible power and all their money and legal and all this shit.
So don't fucking give them another reason to start over, bro. Cause they're clearly good at it. Right? So let's break that fucking cycle. Because it's obviously not all Jews.
Duh. The Crusades weren't all Christians. The Inquisition wasn't all Christians. Right? There's exceptions to every rule.
There's evil Muslims. There's good Muslims. There's fucked up Jews. There's good Jews. The one group where there's no exceptions is pedophiles.
They can get fucked. And by fucked, mean into the dirt quickly covered over with a thick layer. Living or dead, doesn't matter to me. But don't let him come back out ever. I hope I'm allowed to say that on YouTube.
After all the owners of YouTube did like to visit that one island. But man, whatever. People will probably clip what they'll clip. They'll take what they'll take. Whatever.
It's 2025. Y'all know what I mean. Be nice to people. Genuinely. Treat people with respect.
Judge people as individuals for their own actions, right? It's really not that fucking complicated. I find that Christianity is a pretty good way to do it. Following Christ pretty much solves it all. But if you're averse to following Christ, if that's not your vibe, that's cool.
These values are universal. Anyone can do it. Even you, Ben Shapiro, you could figure out how to do it too. You could bring yourself to consider the fact that maybe the lives of Palestinians are not worth three quarters the life of a Jew. Call me I don't know.
Call me old fashioned? Call me new I don't know. It's kind of an awkward one to debate. It's probably why he doesn't wanna debate. It's probably why Ben Shapiro does not wanna debate Nick Fuentes.
@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC
Save this. Forever. Read it every single day. https://t.co/USGaXAx2FV
