reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - April 5, 2023 at 1:05 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Barack Obama orchestrated the sabotage against Trump's presidency, ordering spying against him and his aides. The deep state and OCB are in bed together, preventing another Trump presidency. Trump was naive in his first term, but now understands the corrupt game they're playing. The OCB indictment against Trump is corrupt, with former Obama aide Matthew Colangelo leading the case. Obama is running his third term in the shadows, and Biden's election was not fair. Trump and the author have both been raided and indicted by OCB corruption. Assange and Snowden are the good guys.

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

Obama pulls the strings It was @BarackObama who orchestrated the sabotage against the Trump presidency. Obama ordered the spying against Trump and his aides. All that followed from Flynn to the Russia hoax to the impeachments was planned by Obama, Clinton and Biden (OCB).

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

Trump was a threat to OCB. If he had uncovered the corruption from China to Ukraine they could all be in jail. Trumps ‘draining of the swamp’ had to be stopped. The deep state is in bed with OCB and vice versa. Together they must prevent another Trump presidency or be destroyed.

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

Trump was a fool in his first term. He did not understand how powerful the deep state forces were both in the Democratic and Republican Party. The deep state plays both sides. Trump appointed people who played on his enormous ego, charmed him and then stabbed him in the back.

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

Now Trump is even more dangerous because he finally understands the corrupt game they are playing. If Trump wins again he would appoint people he can trust and dismantle the deep state which protected OCB and benefitted from large scale treachery at the expense of Americans.

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

The OCB indictment against Trump has corruption written all over it. Matthew Colangelo is a former Deputy Assistant to Obama and now leads the case against Trump in the Manhattan DA office. Not to mention the Soros donations to DA Bragg. It couldn’t be more obvious.

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

To understand how @BarackObama is running his third term in the shadows you just have to listen to his own words. If you understand what he’s saying everything that’s happening in the US makes perfect sense. Why do you think you have a clown like @JoeBiden as US President? https://t.co/0X7Ir7ISEc

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

Obama's Third Term - The "Arrangement" The facade was always going to end with Obama railroading Biden in the end... this was ALWAYS the plan.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses a wish for a third term and suggests having a stand-in to deliver speeches while they stay in their basement. They apologize for taking one last question and mention the urgency of addressing the Obama agenda. They repeat their desire to make an arrangement.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wish like you had a sec a a third term. And I I used to say, you know what? If if I could make an arrangement where, I had a I had a stand in a front man or front woman and and they had a near piece in and I was just in my basement in my sweats looking through the stuff and then I could sort of deliver the lines, but somebody else was, doing all the talking the ceremony, I I'd be fine with it. I I'm sorry. I'm gonna just last question I'll take, Ken. I've had I'm really gonna be in trouble. I'm really gonna be in trouble. We have to do those imminently, more imminently even, to address the full Obama agenda of building back better, the full Obama agenda. You know what? If if I could make an arrangement if I could make an arrangement

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

Here’s another video of Obama explaining how he’s running the US Govt in his unofficial third term. It’s naive to think that @JoeBiden won his election fair and square. OCB and the deep state will do anything to prevent another Trump presidency. Absolutely anything. https://twitter.com/mdexposure/status/1641881206512926720 https://t.co/3oObDeTGO8

@MDExposure - Exposure

@DschlopesIsBack Here’s another time he said it

Video Transcript AI Summary
I sometimes miss the mental exercise of solving difficult policy problems. Someone once asked if I would have liked a third term, and while I wouldn't have wanted to be in the spotlight, I might have enjoyed being behind the scenes. Sitting in my basement, giving suggestions and policy advice while someone else played the president with a microphone in their ear. However, I don't miss the pomp and ceremony of the presidency.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And and there are times where I I I do miss the the just the mental, exercise of of figuring out hard policy problems. I I joked somebody asked once, you know, would you have liked to have served a 3rd term if you could have? And I say, you know, I I wouldn't have I I wouldn't have wanted to be out front, But if if somebody had said, you can, sit in your basement in in your sweats, and, there's somebody else who's playing the president with a microphone in in, his or her ear, and and you can just, kinda give suggestions and policy, then I might have, enjoyed doing that. The pomp of the presidency, I don't miss.

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

Trump and I have something in common. We have both been raided and indicted by OCB corruption and we are victims of the deep state. But unlike Trump I can see that Assange and Snowden are the good guys and making America great again will unfortunately come after a deep long fall.

Saved - August 2, 2023 at 3:48 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
51 former intelligence officials, including 5 ex-CIA heads, claimed Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation during the 2020 election. However, it was later revealed that the laptop was real and coordinated with Joe Biden's campaign. Some officials admitted doing it to help Biden win. Surprisingly, none of them face charges for defrauding the US, and they retain their security clearances. Meanwhile, Donald Trump is charged with defrauding the US for challenging the election. The DC elite prioritize their power over the nation's well-being.

@greg_price11 - Greg Price

Reminder: 51 former intelligence officials, including five former heads of the CIA, went on the record during the 2020 election to say that Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation. We later learned that not only was the laptop was in fact real, but they did it in coordination with Joe Biden's campaign and a few of them have even admitted they did it because they wanted Joe Biden to win. Not only have none of them been charged for "Conspiracy to defraud the United States" but all of them still have their security clearances today.

@greg_price11 - Greg Price

Instead the person being charged with "Conspiracy To Defraud The United States" is Donald Trump for saying that the 2020 election was rigged and stolen, as well as constitutionally challenging the election in court. The permanent DC class will destroy our country to protect their own power.

Saved - November 29, 2023 at 4:23 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The fear of Trump's revenge and weaponization of bureaucracies is directly proportional to Biden's decline and family corruption. The Left's hypocrisy is evident in their attempts to wreck Trump's administration, suppress evidence, and politicize institutions. From the FBI to the IRS, Obama-Biden's legacy paved the way for partisan operations. The media conveniently forgets the Logan Act farce, calls for military coups, and violent fantasies against Trump. The truth is, they fear Trump would do exactly what they would do in his place, and that horrifies them.

@VDHanson - Victor Davis Hanson

Don’t Do Unto Others What We Would Have Done to Them? Once more, it gets even creepier how the projectionist Left is daily still shrieking about impending Trump “revenge” and “rage”, or about Trump’s purported enemies lists to come, or about his planned weaponization of the bureaucracies. The fear is in direct proportion to Biden cognitive decline, sinking polls, and walls-are-closing-in family corruption. Should we laugh or cry about the transparent hypocrisy? After all, who tried to wreck an administration with a 22-month-long Russian “collusion” fraud, suppressed a laptop with the lie it was Russian “disinformation”, or impeached a president for a phone call correctly identifying the Biden family’s operation in Ukraine as utterly corrupt and at the expense of U.S. interests? Do we recall that the Obama-Biden nexus—from 2009-17, and from 2021 until now—cemented the reputation of FBI as a partisan operation, rebooted the Pentagon as an agent of woke change ferreting out “white rage” and “white privilege”, reinvented the DOJ as a Biden family protection service, politicized the CIA so that it, along with the FBI, interfered in the 2016 and 2020 elections, and warped the IRS by suppressing evidence of Biden family tax fraud? What Lois Lerner, Eric Holder (self-identified as Obama’s “wingman”), and Loretta Lynch left undone was taken up by Merrick Garland. Does the New York Times, or Joe Scarborough or any of these strange pundits raging about Trump rage to come remember how the “Logan Act” farce was used to destroy Michael Flynn? Or the Foreign Policy essay of Rosa Brooks, a former Obama-era Pentagon lawyer, about how to drive out Trump without waiting for the 2020 election, by either impeachment, the 25thAmendment—or a military coup? How about the “kill Trump” porn that saw celebrities, actors, and academics envisioning decapitating, stabbing, shooting, exploding, or incinerating the orange man? How about Anonymous’s confessions about how fellow bureaucrats were trying to undermine and sabotage the operations of the Trump administration from within? Or the Pentagon’s retired 4-stars calling for Trump to be removed the “sooner the better”, or labeling him a Mussolini or Nazi-like figure? Who paid Twitter millions to censor the news of political opponents? Who paid foreign national Christopher Steele to peddle a fake dossier to destroy the 2016 Republican candidate? Do we remember Biden’s Phantom-of-the-Opera harangue about his “ultra-MAGA” and “semi-fascists” political enemies? Were not the twin pillars of Biden’s current foreign policy team, National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan, and Secretary of State Antony Blinken, once respectively knee-deep in the anti-Trump Alfa Bank-ping hoax and the “51 Intelligence Authorities” laptop scam? Again, the reason the media and politicians are terrified is that they are convinced Trump would do exactly what they would do in his place—and what they would do utterly suddenly horrifies them.

Saved - March 11, 2024 at 10:23 PM

@seanmdav - Sean Davis

Liz Cheney ran an op to prevent Trump from doing anything to secure the Capitol, and then went and impeached him and tried to have him thrown in prison, claiming he failed to secure the Capitol (in reality, he wanted thousands of troops, but Pelosi and the corrupt D.C. mayor refused).

@HeyTammyBruce - Tammy Bruce

Liz Cheney 'secretly orchestrated Washington Post op-ed by all ten living former Defense Secretaries - including her father - warning against Trump's efforts to politicize the military', new report claims  https://mol.im/a/9554985

Liz Cheney secretly orchestrated op-ed warning on Trump military Republican Rep. Liz Cheney secretly helped put together an op-ed by 10 former Defense Secretaries before Jan. 6th warning that the time for disputing election results 'has passed.' dailymail.co.uk
Saved - June 28, 2024 at 9:21 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The posts discuss various events, including the alleged coup against Trump, the Mueller investigation, the impeachment proceedings, the COVID-19 pandemic, and the Biden administration. The author expresses skepticism towards the media, accuses Democrats of election fraud, and criticizes the Biden administration's policies. They suggest that Biden may be replaced before the DNC convention. The tone is critical and conspiratorial.

@Rothbard1776 - Murray 🇺🇸

The Trump coup and where we are today: The Obama administration illegally spied on the Republican presidential nominee during the 2016 election based on lies peddled and paid for by Hillary Clinton, a career criminal. The media dutifully played their part to flood the airwaves with accusations Trump was a Russian agent. After Trump’s surprise election victory, the Obama administration immediately initiated plans to cover their tracks, protect themselves from prosecution, and destroy the incoming Trump admin in any way possible. One of the first steps in that plan was to set up Trump’s incoming National Security Advisor, @GenFlynn, who was fired by Obama for the sin of recognizing Barack’s widespread foreign policy and intelligence failures. Flynn was framed. Biden himself recommended using the Logan Act to go after him, a law that’s never been used to prosecute anyone in the history of the United States. Shortly after Trump rightfully fired Obama’s corrupt and incompetent FBI Director, James Comey, the Deputy Attorney General, Rod Rosenstein appointed Robert Mueller to “oversee” the completely made up, fake and phony FBI investigation into the alleged “Russia collusion”, which they knew was a lie from day one. This was less than 5 months into the Trump presidency. The primary purpose of the Mueller probe was to protect the FBI, CIA, DOJ, NSA, corporate media, accomplices in both parties and every other key player in the attempted coup and spy operation from having their crimes exposed by now being able to use the justification that any attempt to look into the crimes related to Spygate would “compromise an ongoing investigation”. We soon discover the entire Mueller team is composed of Anti-Trump sycophants. Peter “we’ll stop him” Strzok. Lisa Page. Andrew Weissmann. And the list goes on. We also learn FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith intentionally altered an email to make it look like Carter Page, a Trump advisor, was a Russian asset by covering up the fact that Page was previously used as an intelligence asset for the United States, providing valuable intel to the government. When the Mueller case was finally wrapped up after 2.5 years, wasting $50 million, conducting hundreds of interviews, using dozens of investigators … they finally admitted the truth: There was no evidence of Russian collusion by President Trump or anyone associated with his campaign. After coming up empty handed, Weissmann and Co. still needed to try and paint Trump in a bad light, so they lay out a bogus case for “obstruction of justice” because Trump committed the horrific crime of … defending himself from false allegations. Every member of the Mueller team then deleted all of the data from their government issued iPhones and devices by “accidentally” entering their passwords incorrectly 10+ times in a row. The destruction of their communications is a felony. No one was charged. Does this sound like someone else you know who BleachBit her devices and smashed them with a hammer? Less than on month later on April 21st, Trump called newly elected Ukrainian President Zelensky to congratulate him on his victory. On April 25th, four days later, Biden announces his candidacy for President and Hunter steps down from the Board of Burisma. On July 24th, 2019 Robert Mueller testified before Congress on the results of “his” investigation. The very next day, Trump has a call with recently elected Ukrainian President Zelenskyy. On that call, Trump expresses hope that Zelenskyy will investigate the alleged corruption in his country. Burisma, as well as Crowdstrike, who allegedly had “proof” the DNC was “hacked by Russia”, are mentioned. Both set off 5-alarm fire bells in DC. Burisma would Biden family corruption. The second would expose the grand lie that the DNC was hacked by Russia. PS - Who was Seth Rich and why did Donna Brazile “fear for her life” after he was killed in a “botched robbery”?

@Rothbard1776 - Murray 🇺🇸

After that second call with Zelenskyy, the DC establishment immediately set in motion plans for an eventual impeachment. Less than 30 days later, first major step toward that end was an “anonymous whistleblower complaint” being filed in August, 2019. We later discover the anonymous “whistleblower” was Eric Ciaramella, who had coordinated with Adam Schiff’s staff before filing the complaint. Democrats then initiated an endless parade of public hearings from career bureaucrats and Deep State partisan hacks who all hated Trump. Remember Alexander Vindman? Fiona Hill? Democrats falsely claim Trump threatened to withhold military aid if Ukraine didn’t investigate the Biden family. Trump had actually provided lethal defensive weapons to Ukraine that Obama had refused to, which US officials were forced to admit under questioning by Republicans. Not quite the actions of a Russian agent. Nevertheless, on December 18, 2019, after months of public hearings on Ukraine, along with impeachment inquiries in Congress to set the stage for their next attempt to sabotage Trump, House Democrats led by Nancy Pelosi introduced the first articles of impeachment against DJT. Bear in mind, The Trump administration had immediately released a transcript of the Zelenskyy call in question because there was nothing to hide. Democrats accused Trump of obstructing justice by defending himself against the ludicrous Russian collusion scam investigation, and “abusing his power” by asking Zelenskyy to investigate the (obvious) corruption in his country. As we all know, the Biden family was involved in well-documented influence peddling from Joe’s position in Washington. Remember, Biden was overseeing Ukrainian policy while serving as VP. Hunter was making $83,333 a month serving on the board of Burisma alone. Hunter’s business partners, Tony Bobulinski, verified the accuracy of the emails from the Biden laptop, which the public now knows are 100% real and accurate. The FBI had the laptop the whole time (starting in at least September ‘19) and covered it up. Biden is on tape threatening to withhold $1B in loan guarantees unless Ukraine fired the prosecutor who was looking into Burisma’s corruption, threads that may ultimately implicate Hunter, the Biden family and several US political leaders and their families (Romney, Pelosi, McCain, Graham, etc.) involved in various Ukrainian kickbacks and shady dealings. Why wouldn’t the American people want this to be investigated? The first impeachment was finally put up for a vote on February 5th, 2020. It was narrowly defeated, 52-48. While the impeachment sideshow was occurring to further handicap and damage Trump’s administration for the millionth time, the seeds were being sown for the next stage of the coup operation, the COVID-19 pandemic. Remember, impeachment articles were brought on December 18th, 2019 after being held by Democrats for weeks. On December 12th, people in Wuhan reportedly began to have flu like symptoms. On New Year’s Eve, the [corrupt] WHO office in China are informed about a pneumonia like illness spreading in Wuhan, connected to the “wet market”. New Year’s Day, Wuhan market is closed. On January 7th, 2020, China determines that a novel coronavirus is responsible for the outbreak. The historic Phase-One China trade deal was signed and became enforceable on January 15th, 2020. Interesting timing … Eight days later on January 23rd, China places the entire city of Wuhan under lockdown. January 24th, one travel-related case is identified in Illinois, bringing the total US “cases” to two. Remember, we know now the “cases” and entire pandemic was a carefully constructed and well organized fraud compared to how it was presented. The videos of people dropping dead in the streets, the “overwhelmed” hospitals, the fraudulent PCR tests, the made up “social distancing” guidelines, the bat soup. All of it.

@Rothbard1776 - Murray 🇺🇸

I’d be remiss if I didn’t also mention Event 201 hosted by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and World Economic Forum back in October, 2019, predicting a COVID pandemic. Must’ve been a lucky guess. Fast forward to March 13th, barely a month after the impeachment trial is over: the Trump administration declares a national emergency. On March 15th, states begin to lockdown. Panic ensues. Toilet paper shortage. COVID case and death count tallies are displayed on newly every TV station for months. You know the rest. Fast forward to the summer of 2020 and the George Floyd riots. The CDC comes out and says social justice is so important that the “deadly pandemic” restrictions don’t apply to any of the protestors or all 5 of George Floyd’s golden casket funerals. Apparently regular laws didn’t apply to tether as our cities burned and innocent people were murdered (RIP David Dorn), at the same time your businesses were locked down, you missed cancer screenings and doctors appointments, surgeries were cancelled or postponed, schools were closed, gyms were closed and people were being arrested for walking on the beach by themselves or playing on the playground at the local park. Without rehashing the entire pandemic, I’ll focus in on a few key points: The economy was destroyed. The completely made-up justification for universal mail-in ballots is implemented. Swing states like PA begin to illegally change their election laws without a vote by their respective state legislatures in the weeks and months leading up to the November presidential election. Meanwhile a news story breaks about the Biden laptop from hell. 51 intel officers sign a document stating that it has all the hallmarks of a Russian disinformation operation. We know the laptop was 100% real. Clear election interference. Election night: Trump is dominating Biden. He wins key battleground states of Florida, Ohio + Iowa, along with all of the traditional Republican strongholds. He has big leads in each of the remaining (6) swing states. All of a sudden, out of nowhere and for the first time in history, they stop the counts in each of these states. As a side note: on the day of the election, the CDC released a memo saying that even if you had an active COVID infection, you could still vote in person, which completely eviscerated the case for mail-in ballots, which were already mailed out in the tens of millions all over the country. In Fulton County, GA, the media breaks a story claiming that a pipe break caused a flood in State Farm Arena where votes were being cast and counted. We later found out it was leaky toilet. Republican poll watchers and media figures are sent home for the night after being told counting would be paused for the evening and resume in the AM. When Republican poll watchers and media figures leave, Democrats stay behind to count ballots in secret, unsupervised, for at least two hours. Camera footage shows ballots being scanned multiple times, ballots being pulled from underneath tables and more. Media runs cover. In unrelated news, Fulton County is currently in court requesting that ALL BALLOTS from 2020 be destroyed. Brian Kemp, GA Governor, also just revealed that he didn’t vote for Trump in 2020. Same guy who refused to investigate election fraud. Shocker. In any event, I could do the same for each state, but if you’ve made it this far, I shouldn’t have to belabor the obvious. After the initial vote counts were stopped, several states went on to see their results flip overnight at 4 am, and Trump’s lead continued to be chipped away as more mail-in ballots were miraculously discovered. As the days dragged on, the coup was complete. The regime had installed their puppet and successfully torpedoed the Presidency of Donald Trump, while every single one of them managed to escape accountability for the Russia Hoax, spying on Trump’s campaign, COVID, Ukrainian corruption, election fraud, election interference and a host of other crimes.

@Rothbard1776 - Murray 🇺🇸

Shortly after Biden is declared the winner, President Trump is kicked off social media platforms across the internet (Twitter, Facebook, IG, YouTube) while he was still the Commander-In-Chief. It’s still mind-boggling to think about. I can’t believe they had the balls to do it. After officially taking office, the Biden administration quickly went to work destroying the United States, which they’ve been accomplishing with frightening speed. Inflation at 40-year highs. A housing crisis. Runaway deficits. Illegal immigration at all time highs. A disastrous foreign policy that includes the horrendously executed Afghan withdrawal; assassinating a family of 10 (7 of whom were children) via drone strike, supporting the slaughter of both Russians and Ukrainians by sabotaging a peace deal and giving $200B to Ukraine; committing a terrorist act by blowing up the Nordstream pipeline; the illegal seizure of $300B in Russian assets by Janet Yellen which will destroy any remaining faith in the US government on the international stage, undermining trust in the USD as the world’s reserve currency; the disasters in Israel and Gaza; and pushing the BRICS partnership, along with a growing coalitions of nations to abandon the US dollar. As if those failures weren’t enough: the Biden administration fought to extend COVID lockdowns, mandated COVID vaccines for the military, healthcare personnel and others, expanded internet censorship of opposing viewpoints and colluded with Big Tech companies to silence their critics, labeled parents at school-board meetings domestic terrorists for questioning pornographic books displayed in elementary school libraries, and locked up hundreds (or thousands) of non-violent protestors on J6. With too many failures to list and a President who’s been suffering from obvious cognitive decline throughout his entire Presidency, the media has dutifully defended him at every turn. They’ve said he’s as mentally sharp as he’s been, has more stamina than anyone else they’ve ever seen, and works 12 hour days without breaking a sweat. Meanwhile he can barely string two sentences together in public, turns into a Roomba when it’s time to find his way off stage, pooped his pants at the Vatican, has fallen on numerous occasions, crashed his bicycle, still thinks he’s in the Senate, campaigned from his basement back in 2020 and almost never gives interviews to the press. No matter how much our eyes and ears show the opposite, the media has consistently defended his “fitness” for office. While the corporate media apparatus has been defending their puppet, the DNC has been carefully executing their plan to replace Joe Biden at or just before the upcoming DNC convention. Thursday night’s debate was the first public step towards that goal. Uniparty media members and Democrat internet commentators began to astroturf the airwaves pointing out Biden’s cognitive decline as if it was some new revelation. There’s a reason why the June 24th debate was chosen. The DNC convention is scheduled for August 19th-22nd. Tonight’s carefully managed train-wreck lays the ground work for the complicit media and DNC operatives to begin planting the necessary narratives to facilitate the eventual removal and replacement of Joe Biden, a political liability. The only question now is, who does the establishment replace him with? As the great @TheLastRefuge2 has echoed for many, many years, “There are trillions of dollars at stake”. Trump surprised them in 2016. They won’t leave anything to chance again. There are no coincidences. Every action is carefully planned with the sole intent of gaining power and holding onto it with an iron fist. Tonight was the first arrow in Joe’s back. To any unbiased and moderately observant person, the media’s sudden flip flop is yet more undeniable proof that they’re all paid propagandists who deserve no respect and no trust, only ridicule. The election is 129 days away. Buckle up and prepare for fireworks.

Saved - July 16, 2024 at 3:13 AM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And now, ARREST THEM ALL, starting with Barrack Obama, “We now have black and white evidence, that the FBI attempted to overthrow the United States government on behalf of Hillary Clinton in 2016, And, the CIA overthrew the United States government on behalf of Joe Biden in 2020,

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Clinton plan intelligence involved creating a scandal linking Trump to Russia. President Obama, Vice President Biden, and Comey were briefed on this, but it was not shared with agents or the FISA court. The Steele dossier has not been corroborated. The FBI's payments to Steele and Twitter were explained as standard practice. The FBI's actions regarding the Hunter Biden laptop and financial institutions were questioned as political. The FBI's reputation was criticized for appearing political. The FBI's request for financial data from Bank of America was brought up.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jordan referenced the Clinton plan intelligence. Exactly what was the Clinton plan? Speaker 1: Based on declassified documents in the public record, there was intelligence information that, was received, at virtually the same time that the information came from, from the Australians. I mean, within a day or 2. That intelligence and included information that there was a purported plan, designed by one of missus Clinton's foreign policy advisers, to create a scandal tying Donald Trump, to the Russians. That's the essence of the intelligence as contained in the, declassified information. Speaker 0: Did the president receive this intelligence? Speaker 1: On August 3, 2016, then director Brennan had briefed the president, vice president, director of National Intelligence, the FBI, the attorney general, and others. Speaker 2: When you Speaker 0: say the FBI, you mean mister Comey? Speaker 1: They had on August 3rd, it was, conducted at the White House. It was director Comey himself. Speaker 0: So mister Comey knew about this. President Obama knew about this. Vice President Biden knew about this. But, it wasn't provided to the agents, on the case or provided to the secret FISA court. Is that correct? Speaker 1: That's correct. Speaker 0: The Steele dossier was entered in the congressional record. Was it true? That's I'm sorry. The Steele dossier Steele dossier was it was entered into our congressional record. Was it true? There is Speaker 1: not a single substantive piece of information in the dossier that has ever been corroborated by the FBI or to my knowledge anyone else. Speaker 3: Two real quick questions. Why would the FBI offer Christopher Steele a $1,000,000 to verify a dossier about Trump Russian collusion And then the same FBI offer $3,000,000 to Twitter to squash a story on a Hunter Biden laptop. Do you have any idea why a law enforcement agency would be planning to elections? Speaker 2: Well, you raised a number of different issues there. So first, as to the steel dossier, that of course is a subject treated at great length in the Durham report, which we and again, predates my time as director. Speaker 3: I understand that, but it's the same agency paying $1,000,000 to push one story out or try to collaborate one story and $3,000,000 to quite another story for political opponents. I don't quite understand. Speaker 2: And then I would, as to the second part related to Twitter, I would disagree with your characterization respectfully. When there are payments to social media companies that is by longstanding federal law going back I think about 4 decades where we have to pay companies for their costs in responding to legal process and it's not just social media companies, it's other kinds of businesses as well. Speaker 3: Well, when those stories get out and you understand it's certainly the dossier story and I know that went under your watch, but also the the the Hunter Biden laptop story, that to me looks political. To the American people, it looks political. And I'm just an everyday guy. I'm not an attorney, mister Wray. Just an everyday guy. But to me, it looks extremely political, and that is why you're having trouble keeping the FBI's reputation afloat. And so with that, mister chairman, I'm gonna yield the balance of my time, but I do I wanna enter one thing to the record, mister chairman. Speaker 4: Do that after and just yield and we'll enter in record after. Sure. Sure. Director Ray, did the FBI ask financial institutions to turn over their customers you have the sign to me. Did the FBI ask financial institution to turn over their customers' debit and credit card purchase history in the Washington D. C. Area for January 5th 6th, 2021? Speaker 2: I don't know the answer to that as I sit here right now. Well, we do because Bank Speaker 4: of America gave us this email from the FBI to Bank of America. Well
Video Transcript AI Summary
The FBI interfered in the 2016 election to help Hillary Clinton, then tried to sabotage the Trump administration. In 2020, the CIA labeled the Hunter Biden laptop as Russian disinformation. Evidence from the Durham investigation and congressional probes shows US intelligence agencies and the DOJ meddled in elections. They fear a Republican president in 2024 will hold them accountable for their crimes. Expect interference in the next election to protect themselves. Whistleblowers revealed they were instructed not to document their actions, indicating awareness of wrongdoing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now have black and white evidence that the FBI interfered in the 2016 election. And then when they fail to get their candidate elected, Hillary Clinton, then they just set out to destroy the Trump administration. So then go back and go up to 2020. It was the CIA this time that got involved in the 2020 election with those 51 former intel agents who talked about the Hunter Biden laptop as total Russian disinformation. So they've gotten away with it for 2 elections. They're for sure gonna get away with it, try to get away with it in 24. Right? Because there's no consequence. The difference is in 2024, the evidence is there. We now have the Durham investigation. We have all the congressional investigations. There is now hard evidence that there was election interference by the US intelligence agencies and the Department of Justice. They've gotta be terrified. Those individuals have to be terrified that a Republican president comes in in the 2 2,000 24 election with a Republican attorney general, investigates them and charges them all with the crimes they've committed over the last 8 years. Speaker 1: Well, we'll see about that. You're right. There are questions around these elections because of this interference. Do you think there will be election interference then in 24? Speaker 0: Take it to the bank. They will absolutely interfere in 2,024. We're not sure how, but they will absolutely interfere not only because they're not gonna like whoever the Republican candidate is, but because they're gonna protect their own hides. That's why they're they were talking to their own people, and the whistleblowers have brought this up. That they were told, don't put anything on paper. Just tell us orally. They knew that they were doing stuff wrong. They knew that they were gonna be liable for

@catturd2 - Catturd ™

Arrest Barrack Obama for treason. Arrest Hillary Clinton for treason. Arrest John Brennan for treason. Arrest James Clapper for treason. Arrest James Comey for treason. Arrest everyone in the CIA, FBI, and our government who was responsible for spying and sabotaging Trump. THIS IS STRAIGHT UP TREASON !!!

Saved - September 25, 2024 at 3:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe that President Trump has made serious allegations regarding an attempted overthrow of the government, claiming that many were involved and have been caught. He asserts that there is clear evidence of FBI involvement in 2016 and CIA actions in 2020, both allegedly on behalf of Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden, respectively. He calls for the arrest of all involved, emphasizing the need for accountability, starting with Barack Obama, for various crimes including perjury and election interference.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And here is, President Trump, “This was an attempted overthrow of the government and a lot people were in on it. AND THEY GOT CAUGHT. THEY GOT CAUGHT RED-HANDED.” “We now have black and white evidence.” BEYOND THE SHADOW Of A DOUBT that the FBI attempted the overthrow of the United States government on behalf of Hillary Clinton in 2016, And, the CIA toppled the United States government on behalf of Joe Biden in 2020, And now, ARREST THEM ALL AT ONCE. for the crimes of perjury, obstruction of justice, election interference, racketeering, and seditious conspiracy for the overthrow of United States government. But Barack Obama FIRST.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Fabricated evidence was used and the courts were lied to, to ensure a certain outcome, which should never happen again. The details of the report are worse than imagined. Without a certain important move, things would have been even worse, and they might have succeeded. This was an attempted overthrow of government, and many people were involved. They got caught red handed. The Durham report is coming out soon, and it contains this information, plus more. It's incredible this was caught. This is one of the great achievements because what was found should never happen again.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fabricated evidence and they lied to the courts, and they did all sorts of things to have it go their way. And this was something that, we can never allow to happen again. The report actually, and especially when you look into it and the details of the report, are far worse than anything I would have even imagined. What they were doing and what they would have done if I didn't make a certain move, a certain move that was a very important move because it would have been even worse, if that's possible. And they might have been able to succeed. This was an overthrow of government. This was an attempted overthrow, and a lot of people were in on it. And they got caught. They got caught red handed. And I look forward to the Durham report, which is coming out in the not too distant future. It's got his own information, which is this information, plus, plus, plus. And it's an incredible thing that happened, and we're lucky we caught him. I think I'm gonna put this down as one of our great achievements because what we found and what we saw, never ever should this happen again.
Video Transcript AI Summary
According to declassified documents, there was intelligence information received around the same time as information from the Australians, indicating a purported plan by one of Hillary Clinton's foreign policy advisors to create a scandal tying Donald Trump to Russia. Then-Director Brennan briefed President Obama, Vice President Biden, Director of National Intelligence, the FBI (Director Comey), the Attorney General, and others about this intelligence on August 3, 2016. A congressman stated that the Steele dossier was entered into the congressional record, but that there is not a single substantive piece of information in the dossier that has ever been corroborated by the FBI or to his knowledge anyone else. Another congressman questioned why the FBI allegedly offered Christopher Steele $1,000,000 to verify the dossier and then allegedly offered $3,000,000 to Twitter to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story, suggesting the FBI was planning elections. Director Ray responded that payments to social media companies are for costs in responding to legal processes, as per longstanding federal law. Another congressman asked Director Ray if the FBI asked financial institutions to turn over customers' debit and credit card purchase history in the Washington D.C. area for January 5th-6th, 2021. Director Ray stated he did not know the answer.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jordan referenced the Clinton plan intelligence. Exactly what was the Clinton plan? Speaker 1: Based on declassified documents in the public record, there was intelligence information that, was received, at virtually the same time that the information came from, from the Australians, I mean, within a day or 2. That intelligence included information that there was a, purported plan, designed by, one of missus Clinton's foreign policy advisers, to create a scandal tying Donald Trump, to the Russians. That's the essence of the intelligence as contained in the, declassified information. Speaker 0: Did the president receive this intelligence? Speaker 1: On August 3, 2016, then director Brennan had briefed the president, vice president, director of National Intelligence, the FBI, the attorney general, and others. Speaker 2: When you Speaker 0: say the FBI, you mean mister Comey? Speaker 1: He had on August 3rd, it was, conducted at the White House. It was director Comey himself. Speaker 0: So mister Comey knew about this. President Obama knew about this. Vice president Biden knew about this. But, it wasn't provided to the agents, on the case or provided to the secret FISA court. Is that correct? Speaker 1: That's correct. Speaker 0: The Steele dossier was entered in the congressional record. Was it true? That's I'm sorry. The Steele dossier Steele dossier was it was entered into our congressional record. Was it true? Speaker 1: There is not a single substantive piece of information in the dossier that has ever been corroborated by the FBI or to my knowledge anyone else. You Speaker 2: Two real quick questions. Why would the FBI offer Christopher Steele a $1,000,000 to verify a dossier about Trump Russian collusion, and then the same FBI offer $3,000,000 to Twitter to squash a story on a Hunter Biden laptop? Do you have any idea why a law enforcement agency would be planning to elections? Speaker 3: Well, you raised a number of different issues there. So first, as to the Steele dossier, that of course is a subject treated at great length, in the Durham report, which we and again predates my time as director. Speaker 2: I understand that, but it's the same agency paying $1,000,000 to push one story out or try to collaborate one story and $3,000,000 to quite another story for political opponents. I don't Speaker 3: quite understand. And then I would as to the second part related to Twitter, I would disagree with your characterization respectfully. When there are payments to social media companies, that is by longstanding federal law going back I think about 4 decades where we have to pay companies for their costs in responding to legal process and it's not just social media companies it's other kinds of businesses as well. Speaker 2: Well, when those stories get out and you understand and certainly the dossier story and I know that went under your watch, but also the the the Hunter Biden laptop story, that to me looks political to the American people, it looks political. And I'm just an everyday guy. I'm not an attorney, mister Ray, Just an everyday guy. But to me, it looks extremely political, and that is why you're having trouble keeping the FBI's reputation afloat. And so with that, mister chairman, I'm gonna yield the balance of my time, but I do I wanna enter one thing to the record, mister chairman. Speaker 4: Do that after and just yield and we'll enter in the record after. Sure. Director Ray, did the FBI ask financial institutions to turn over their customers yield the sign to me. Did the FBI ask financial institution to turn over their customers debit and credit card purchase history in the Washington DC area for January 5th 6, 2021? Speaker 3: I don't know the answer to that as I sit here right now. Speaker 4: Well, we do because Bank of America gave us this email from the FBI to Bank of America. Well

@catturd2 - Catturd ™

Arrest Barrack Obama for treason. Arrest Hillary Clinton for treason. Arrest John Brennan for treason. Arrest James Clapper for treason. Arrest James Comey for treason. Arrest everyone in the CIA, FBI, and our government who was responsible for spying and sabotaging Trump. THIS IS STRAIGHT UP TREASON !!!

Saved - October 22, 2024 at 10:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2020, the Transition Integrity Project (TIP) conducted wargames to strategize responses to a potential Trump refusal to concede the election. Funded by anti-Trump groups, these exercises predicted election chaos due to mail-in voting and discussed extreme measures, including military intervention and civil unrest. Following scrutiny, TIP rebranded as the Democracy Futures Project, aiming to counter a potential second Trump presidency. They concluded that lawful means would fail, hinting at drastic actions, including potential violence, to disrupt a Trump victory.

@DefiyantlyFree - Insurrection Barbie

In 2020 there was something called the Transition Integrity Project (TIP). It was a bunch of wargames that were set up by the most deep state Trump hating people you can imagine run by Rosa Brooks. Rosa Brooks is the former assistant to George Soros, she was a Pentagon official, she is Georgetown law professor, and she is a Democratic Party operative. This nonpartisan TIP project was funded by Protect Democracy and United to Protect Democracy. Both of these were actually launched in January 2017 by former Obama administrative lawyers. One of those lawyers is former deputy White House Council Ian Bassin. They were formed as a resistance to the Trump administration. In late June of 2020, TIP conducted a tabletop exercise using establishment democrats and the never Trump faction of the Republican party, such as Michael Steele to map out the realities of a potential coup by Donald Trump who would refuse to leave office. This dark insidious project was documented and reported on by people like @RaheemKassam and @MikeBenzCyber and the war room but other than that, the mainstream media coverage of this was spotty at best. The wargames were played out under the assumption that Donald Trump was a dictator who was going to consolidate power with his base of white supremacists who would need to be neutralized and eliminated after the election. Yes that was their language.

@DefiyantlyFree - Insurrection Barbie

In the 2020 version of this exercise they prophetically predicted that the outcome of the 2020 election would not be decided on election day because of widespread mail in voting. There would be a red mirage where Trump would look like he was winning, but once the real votes were counted, he would lose to Biden. The rest of the wargaming exercises were how they were planning on getting Donald Trump out of the office if he refused to concede and leave. There was five wargames and I’m going to summarize the overall gist. Donald Trump somehow remains in office. The options were to cause a rebellion and try to get specific states from seceding from the union. And no, I am not joking and all of this can be researched and verified. There were only two variables in this wargame exercises, and that was how is the military going to respond and what control will the Democrats have over the street riots that would naturally ensue “organically” meaning well planned and funded by Soros. On August 11, 2020, there was an article published in Defense One expressly calling for a military coup. When faced with backlash from that article, the Atlantic published the now infamous article about the fake suckers and losers hoax to deflect. Due to the enormous amount of scrutiny, TIP received after the 2020 election, they have regrouped and renamed themselves to the Democracy Futures Project (DFP). The goal of this new project is to create a unified front of globalist foundations to subvert a second Trump presidency and the nationalist Maga movement. The funding for this comes from the Packard foundation, and Pierre Omidyar. In May and June of this year they met in Washington DC and they made up teams of red and blue. The teams consisted of former senators and members of Congress of both parties, senior state officials, business leaders, retired flag military officers, trade union leaders, and former Trump administration officials who became never Trump. One such participant was Jamie Raskin. There were five different wargames, but let me just focus on the one that is most pertinent because it’s the one I believe they’re going to deploy when Donald Trump wins. The main topic was that riots that would occur throughout the country as a result of Trump winning the election, Trump would go ahead and invoke the insurrection act, and they need to figure out how to subvert this. The second major part of their operation was they were going to stop Donald Trump from deporting the millions of illegal immigrants. If you would like to read the details of these wargames, I have linked some articles from the Washington Post that discusse this. From those article once you start to deep dive into the names and players and organizations, you can see how dark and disturbing this is.

@DefiyantlyFree - Insurrection Barbie

The wargames ended by concluding that they cannot use lawful means against Trump’s alleged anticipated actions because those lawful means would not work this time around . Because they could not use any lawful means to stop a duly elected president from taking office they decided that democracy would be over. They discussed the article Robert Kagan, who is the husband of Victoria Newland wrote in the Washington Post last December, which pretty much made the case for the assassination of Donald Trump. You can read the article yourself and you can also listen to Steve Bannon’s The War Room because he covered this topic in depth after that article came out. This is just pure and total speculation, but it would seem to me that it’s possible that the assassination attempts that occurred after are once again prophetic. One of the major participants of this project was David Roth, who is the editor of Foreign Affairs Magazine, and a managing Director of Kissinger Associates. He wrote a book called American American Resistance: The story of how the deep State save the nation. The book discusses the courage of the inside agents in the first Trump administration who worked to sabotage it at every turn. When Donald Trump wins, they are going to activate their paramilitary street army I like to refer to as WokeQaeda so that they can destabilize the country via riots and chaos in the streets while pretending that those riots and chaos are peaceful protests, we’ve already seen this entire playbook in 2020 with BLM. The full-blown color revolution that hit Ukraine and Serbia and other places in the world is coming to a street year you whenTrump wins. If you think I’m making any of this up, feel free to read the Washington Post article and also feel free to look at the X account called Deep State Radio . They have a weekly podcast which I have listened to and let me tell you orwellian doesn’t even begin to describe it. Sunlight is the best disinfectant and I hope that people will actually take this seriously because in 2020 when people like @RaheemKassam was talking about it nobody was paying attention, but then it happened exactly the way that little war game predicted. There are so many other angles I want to look into but this is a good introduction of what to come now that it’s clear Donald Trump is dominating this race.

@DefiyantlyFree - Insurrection Barbie

https://beehaw.org/post/15335356

'Democracy will suffer a relatively quiet death:' Simulations show what would happen in the U.S. if Trump is back in the White House in March 2025 ... - Beehaw Archived version [https://web.archive.org/web/20240731155820/https://www.thebulwark.com/p/democracy-suffer-quiet-death-simulated-trump] … and what steps civil society can take now to save democracy PICTURE THIS: It’s March 2025, and Donald Trump is back in the White House. […] The presidential transition was peaceful. Kamala Harris conceded defeat, Biden vacated the White House, and although there were protests around the country and sporadic clashes between protesters and counterprotesters, the nation hasn’t descended into chaos or civil war. On television, the talking heads are having a good laugh: All that talk about existential threats to democracy looks so silly in hindsight! The core institutions of American democracy are still there, same as ever. At least, that’s how it looks from the outside. But on the inside, the norms and institutions that constitute the U.S. democracy are crumbling. […] The Democracy Futures Project organized five large-scale, nonpartisan simulation exercises. They were looking for insights into what might happen if a second Trump administration follows through on Trump’s autocratic threats. […] In one exercise, they posited a narrow Trump win and a GOP-controlled Congress; in the others […] with a closely divided Congress. In two of the exercises [they] explore potential moves in any arena, while in the remaining three were focused on narrower issue areas: immigration, potential domestic use of the military, and how Trump might use federal regulatory, investigative, and prosecutorial powers. […] None of the simulations devolved into mass violence or civil conflict, and Team Trump found it difficult to fully execute its most ambitious plans. For instance, in one of our exercises, Trump’s efforts to detain millions of undocumented migrants floundered; the money and infrastructure for such a massive operation proved too challenging. In another, red state governors joined blue state governors in resisting efforts to federalize their national guard units and send them to quell anti-Trump protests in major U.S. cities. […] Overall, the simulations suggested that we should worry a little less about the extremes, such as mass detentions, large-scale organized political violence, or the mass-scale domestic deployment of active-duty military forces to suppress lawful protests. But our exercises also suggested that if Trump’s second administration proves more careful and competent than his first, most Americans may simply remain unaware—or aware but passive—as a quiet autocratic revolution takes place. Imagine, for instance, something like this in spring 2025: - On the surface, America seems stable. For nearly all Americans, life continues as usual. But at the Pentagon, top generals are being forced out for objecting to Trump’s cozy relationship with Russia and his plans to use active-duty troops to round up migrants. - At the CIA, the Justice Department, and other agencies, civil servants are being reassigned or fired for raising concerns about the politicization of intelligence and the pressure to launch ideologically motivated investigations. - High-profile nonprofit groups are undergoing IRS audits, forcing their senior staff to spend most of their time huddled with accountants and lawyers. - More university presidents have resigned in the face of investigations, audits, and threats to yank federal funding over curricula and the actions of student protests. - Meanwhile, a number of high-profile journalists are the targets of leak investigations. The owners of several major media outlets are under investigation for specious criminal tax code violations, and the FCC is considering revoking the broadcast licenses of a dozen television stations. Liz Cheney, Adam Schiff, and retired Gen. Mark Milley are under investigation for allegedly mishandling classified materials. - The nation’s streets are largely peaceful. But around the country, numerous civil servants, reporters, teachers, librarians, election officials, and other community leaders are being doxxed and threatened. The nation’s streets are largely peaceful. But around the country, numerous civil servants, reporters, teachers, librarians, election officials, and other community leaders are being doxxed and threatened. […] Most people will see the writing on the wall: Speak out, and life becomes unpleasant. Your address and children’s names will be posted on social media. You’ll get a nasty letter from the IRS. Perhaps your brother’s undocumented girlfriend will go to work one day and never come home, and you won’t know if she’s been detained or deported. Your pregnant niece might be stopped by police as she drives from Texas to New Mexico, and grilled about whether she’s heading to an abortion clinic. Maybe the FBI and Homeland Security will use undercover agents—or even government surveillance capabilities—to spy on organizations from school boards to church groups, in search of “illegals,” “Christian-hating communists,” the “woke,” and other “vermin.”  The chilling effect on our politics would be intense. Ordinary citizens would self-censor. Many federal, state, and local leaders, rightly worried about the effects on themselves and their families, will quietly step down from their roles. […] Our exercises suggested that the greatest imminent threat to democracy isn’t civil war or mass detentions but age-old human weaknesses: lack of courage and imagination; difficulty overcoming collective-action problems; our desire to hope for the best instead of planning for the worst. […] BUT SIMULATIONS DON’T PREDICT the future. On the contrary, they can serve as powerful wakeup calls, highlighting weaknesses before it’s too late to address them. Isolated and leaderless, defenders of democracy will struggle to effectively counter autocratic actions if Trump wins, but we still have time to create the communities and structures that enable people to stand firm in the face of abuses—if we start planning now. - Isolated individuals can be doxxed, harassed, and intimidated. But well-organized groups, whether churches, unions, or networks of community activists, can provide one another with support and help ranging from money and legal assistance to communications assistance, cybersecurity support, and physical protection for those facing threats to their safety. - At the state and local levels, governors, attorneys general, legislators, and mayors can coordinate across state and municipal lines, sharing information on how to protect their populations and enforce their laws in the face of abusive federal overreach. - Nonprofits can start developing contingency options in case their tax-exempt status is lost. Donors can create pooled funds to move money quickly in emergencies. - Business leaders and influential public figures can coordinate to decide on actions if various red lines are crossed. And political leaders who may find themselves on the outside can lay the groundwork for an opposition leadership structure, one in which figures as diverse as Kamala Harris, Mitt Romney, Liz Cheney, and Barack Obama can help provide direction, coordination, and inspiration to the millions of Americans who don’t want to see the nation slide quietly into autocracy. Rosa Brooks, who co-led the simulation project at Democracy Futures Project: > Our exercises made it clear that if we want to keep our democracy from fading away after a potential Trump win, we can’t wait until November to start organizing. There’s no deus ex machina to save us. We can’t rely on hope, and we can’t assume someone else will do the hard work while we keep our heads down. > Those much-vaunted “guardrails of democracy”? We the people are the only guardrails we’ve got. beehaw.org

@DefiyantlyFree - Insurrection Barbie

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/30/washington-dc-role-play-second-trump-term

Washington insiders simulated a second Trump presidency. Can a role-play save democracy? In a DC-area hotel, Democrats and Republicans met to wargame five scenarios they say are ‘not unrealistic’ theguardian.com
Saved - November 14, 2024 at 1:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe that the actions taken by Barack Obama and his administration regarding the 2016 Trump campaign amount to serious misconduct. I point to the alleged initiation of the Russia Collusion Hoax, with claims that Obama’s CIA and his Chief of Staff John Brennan targeted Trump’s associates. Additionally, a whistleblower report suggests that the FBI, under Comey, conducted covert operations against Trump. I assert that Obama has placed numerous personnel to undermine the government and call for the prosecution of all involved, starting with Obama himself.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And here is, BIGGER THAN WATERGATE, STRAIGHT UP TREASON, A: Barack Obama and his CIA initiated the Russia Collusion Hoax and instructed the “5 eyes” (U.S., Canada, Australia, U.K. and New Zealand) to spy on the 2016 Trump campaign. — Obama’s Chief of Staff John Brennan identified 26 Trump’s associates to “bump” or make contact with or manipulate. B: The House Judiciary Committee CONFIRMS a whistleblower report that the FBI targeted Donald Trump soon after he announced his presidential campaign in June 2015, an off-the-books operation ordered by Obama’s deputy chief of staff FBI Director James B. Comey that predated the Crossfire Hurricane operation. — two female FBI undercover agents infiltrated Trump’s 2016 campaign and were directed to act as “honeypots” while traveling with Trump and his campaign. C: Reports also CONFIRMS Barack Obama has planted approximately 2500 personnel to overthrow the United States government a head of Donald Trump’s 2017 Presidential transition team, as so with Tump’s 2024 transition team. D: In 2020, Barack Obama characterized the conspiracy as “absurd." — In this clip, Obama directly refutes the spying claims — as so “absurd". He then goes rambling about “foundations of democracy” being so sacred that you “do not allow the politicization of the criminal justice system, the intelligence system [or] the military." E: Arrest them all. Prosecute them all. Incarcerate them all at once, for the crimes of fraud, racketeering, obstruction of justice, election interference, and conspiracy to overthrow the United States government. But first Barack Obama.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A report claims that the U.S. intelligence community asked foreign agencies to spy on over two dozen associates of Donald Trump during the 2016 election. It states that former President Obama and CIA Director John Brennan identified these individuals as targets for manipulation and misinformation. The involved nations are part of the "Five Eyes" alliance: the U.S., UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. Reporter Michael Shellenberger suggested that if the information in the report is accurate, it would reveal that the Russia collusion narrative was initiated by the U.S. government, contradicting the official story. This report coincides with House conservatives preparing a bill to reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which permits the collection of communications from foreigners abroad.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Curating the 2016 Russia collusion hoax by asking foreign intelligence agencies to illegally spy on the Trump campaign. Speaker 1: Lucas Tomlinson, in response, speaking with more. Lucas. Speaker 0: Good early morning, Carly and Todd. This report from substack sizing multiple unnamed sources claims the US intelligence community asked foreign spy agencies to help spy on more than 2 dozen associates of Donald Trump in the run up to the 2016 election. It reads in part, quote, president Barack Obama CIA director John Brennan had identified 26 Trump associates for the 5 eyes to target. A source confirmed that the IC had identified them as people to bump or make contact with or manipulate. They were targets of our own IC and law enforcement, targets for collection and misinformation. Now the 5 eyes nations are the US, UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. Here's one of the reporters, Michael Shellenberger, who spoke to Jesse Waters last night. Speaker 1: If this binder contains what we have been told that it contains, which may include raw intelligence, information showing that the US government, the CIA, and the intelligence community of the US government initiated the Russia collusion hoax that it did not occur in the way that the official story, including the Durham investigation, had portrayed it, then that's extremely serious information. Speaker 0: The report was released at the same time house conservatives are preparing a bill that would reauthorize section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act that allows the government to collect communications from foreigners abroad. And today, the House Rules Committee is set to meet over that Pfizer reform bill, Gus. Speaker 1: Lucas Tomlinson, quite a
Video Transcript AI Summary
The allegations against Donald Trump regarding interference in the 2016 election are absurd, even dismissed by Republican-controlled committees and Attorney General Barr. This situation highlights a larger issue: the politicization of critical institutions like the criminal justice system, intelligence agencies, and the military. These foundations of democracy must remain separate from politics, especially during times of crisis like high unemployment and a pandemic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The the allegations are so absurd that even Republican controlled committees, you know, looking into it have dismissed them. And, you know, attorney general Barr, has dismissed them. But, you know, this is an example, I think, of a larger problem. Well, 2 2 larger problems, which don't get as much attention understandably when you've got high unemployment and a pandemic raging because it doesn't touch people's day to day lives. But one of the central foundation stones of a democracy is the idea that you do not, you do not allow the politicization of the criminal justice system, the intelligence system, the military. Right? That that that is stuff that you keep out of politics. That's former US president Barack Obama there calling Donald Trump's allegations that he interfered in the 2016 election as absurd.

@Cernovich - Cernovich

- The whistleblower disclosure said two female FBI undercover agents infiltrated Mr. Trump’s 2016 campaign at high levels and were directed to act as “honeypots” while traveling with Mr. Trump and his campaign staff on the trail. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/oct/29/whistleblower-james-comey-fbi-honey-pot-spies-infi/

Whistleblower: James Comey had FBI ‘honey pot’ spies infiltrate Trump’s 2016 campaign The House Judiciary Committee is examining a whistleblower report that the FBI targeted Donald Trump soon after he announced his presidential campaign in June 2015, an off-the-books operation ordered by FBI Director James B. Comey that predated the Crossfire Hurricane operation. washingtontimes.com
Saved - December 30, 2024 at 8:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In early 2020, Barack Obama dismissed claims of spying on Trump as absurd, yet declassified documents reveal he authorized a conspiracy linked to the Russian Collusion hoax to undermine Trump's presidency. This involved targeting General Michael Flynn, who was cleared by the FBI of acting as a Russian agent. Obama allegedly approved intelligence operations against Trump and his associates, while also being implicated in bribing individuals to further these efforts. As we approach 2024, the implications of these actions loom large, with significant legal challenges ahead.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And this is, Barack Obama in early 2020 flat-out refuting the spying on Trump as so “absurd" that “even Republican controlled committees who are looking into it have dismissed them." DECLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS RELEASED BY DNI JOHN RATCLIFFE CONFIRMS BEYOND THE SHADOW OF A DOUBT, BARACK OBAMA personally authorized the greatest criminal conspiracy in United States history, the Russian Collusion hoax. TO TIE Donald J. Trump, the Trump Organization and Donald J. Trump for President Inc. to the Russians. And the Russians hacking of the Democratic National Committee. Thus attempting to overthrow the United States government in 2016 and then later to overthrow a sitting President in 2017. A: Personally, unmasked, targeted and framed, General Michael Flynn, a three-star United States Army with 33 years of service, 4 Bronze Stars, 5 Commendation Medals. Even though on January 25, 2017 • "FBI advised that they believed Flynn believed what he was saying was true." • FBI determined "Flynn was not acting as an agent of Russia." B: Personally approved 5 Eyes Intelligence Alliance, (U.S., Canada, Australia, U.K. and New Zealand) to execute PROJECT FULSOME seeking intelligence gathering on the Trump Organization and Donald J. Trump for President Inc. • John Brennan, Barack Obama’s chief of staff identified 26 Trump associates to “bump” or make contact with or manipulate. C: General Michael Flynn knew about Barack Obama and his whore Susan Lice, their crimes and illegal activities. Including bribing Stephen Halper with $244,000 to target and tie Donald Trump and his campaign to the Russians. E: Barack Obama “one of the central foundation stones of a democracy is the idea that you do not allow the politicization of the criminal justice system, the intelligence system, the military.” 2 Impeachments 2 Federal indictments 2 State indictments. 2 Assassination attempts And here he is in 2024. His last confession. Knows exactly what’s COMING. The 🔨 of Justice lands January 20, 2025.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The allegations regarding the politicization of the criminal justice system have been dismissed even by Republican-controlled committees. A significant issue is the potential misuse of intelligence, highlighted by a purported plan from a Clinton adviser to create a scandal linking Trump to Russia. On August 3, 2016, key officials, including President Obama and FBI Director Comey, were briefed on this intelligence, but it was not shared with the agents involved or the FISA court. The Steele dossier has not been corroborated by the FBI. Questions arose about the FBI's financial dealings, including a $1 million offer to Christopher Steele and a $3 million payment to Twitter regarding the Hunter Biden laptop story, raising concerns about political motivations. Additionally, there were inquiries about the FBI requesting customer purchase histories related to the January 6 events.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The the allegations are so absurd that even Republican controlled committees, you know, looking into it have dismissed them. And, you know, attorney general Barr, has dismissed them. But, you know, this is an example, I think, of a larger problem. Well, 2 2 larger problems, which don't get as much attention, understandably, when you've got high unemployment and a pandemic raging because it doesn't touch people's day to day lives. But one of the central foundation stones of a democracy is the idea that you do not, you do not allow the politicization of the criminal justice system, the intelligence system, the military. Right? That that that is stuff that you keep out of Mister Speaker 1: Jordan referenced the Clinton plan intelligence. Exactly what was the Clinton plan? Speaker 2: Based on declassified documents in the public record, there was intelligence information that, was received, at virtually the same time that the information came from, from the Australians. I mean, within a day or 2. That intelligence and included information that there was a purported plan, designed by one of missus Clinton's foreign policy advisers, to create a scandal tying Donald Trump, to the Russians. That's the essence of the intelligence as contained in the declassified information. Speaker 1: Did the president receive this intelligence? Speaker 2: On August 3, 2016, then director Brennan had briefed the president, vice president, director of National Intelligence, the FBI, the attorney general, and others. Speaker 3: When you Speaker 1: say the FBI, you mean mister Comey? Speaker 2: He had on August 3rd, it was, conducted at the White House, so it was director Comey himself. Speaker 1: So mister Comey knew about this. President Obama knew about this. Vice President Biden knew about this. But, it wasn't provided to the agents, on the case or or provided to the secret FISA court. Is that correct? Speaker 2: That's correct. Speaker 1: The Steele dossier was entered in the congressional record. Was it true? That's I'm sorry. The Steele dossier Steele dossier was it was entered into our congressional record. Was it true? There is not a single substantive piece Speaker 2: of information in the dossier that has ever been corroborated by the FBI or to my knowledge anyone else. You Speaker 4: Two real quick questions. Why would the FBI offer Christopher Steele a $1,000,000 to verify a dossier about Trump Russian collusion and then the same FBI offer $3,000,000 to Twitter to squash a story on a Hunter Biden laptop. Do you have any idea why a law enforcement agency would be planning to elections? Speaker 5: Well, you raised a number of different issues there. So first, as to the steel dossier, that of course is a subject treated at great length in the Durham report, which we and again predates my time as director. Speaker 4: I understand that, but it's the same agency paying $1,000,000 to push one story out or try to collaborate one story and $3,000,000 to quite another story for political opponents. I don't think Speaker 5: I understand. And then I would as to the second part related to Twitter, I would disagree with your characterization respectfully. When there are payments to social media companies that is by longstanding federal law going back I think about 4 decades where we have to pay companies for their costs in responding to legal process and it's not just social media companies, it's other kinds of businesses as well. Speaker 4: Well, when those stories get out and you understand it's certainly the dossier story and I know that went under your watch, but also the Hunter Biden laptop story that to me looks political. To the American people, it looks political. And I'm just an everyday guy. I'm not an attorney, mister Wray. Just an everyday guy. But to me, it looks extremely political, and that is why you're having trouble keeping the FBI's reputation afloat. And And so with that, mister chairman, I'm gonna yield the balance of my time, but I do I wanna enter one thing to the record, mister chairman. Do that after and Speaker 3: just yield and we'll enter in the record after. Sure. Sure. Director Ray, did the FBI ask financial institutions to turn over their customers yield the sign to me. Did the FBI ask financial institution to turn over their customers debit and credit card purchase history in the Washington D. C. Area for January 5th 6th, 2021? Speaker 5: I don't know the answer to that as I sit here right now. Well, we do because Bank Speaker 3: of America gave us this email from the FBI to Bank of America.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Peter Alexander reports that former Obama administration officials confirmed President Obama warned then-President-elect Trump against hiring Mike Flynn during a meeting shortly after the election. This warning is significant, especially considering Trump's recent criticisms of the Obama administration regarding Flynn. Obama also raised concerns about North Korea during that meeting. In a related discussion, the timeline shows Flynn's retirement from the army in 2014 and his subsequent meeting with Trump in 2015. Stefan Halper, who received a $245,000 contract to study Russia and China, is seen as central to the "Russiagate" operation, particularly in targeting Flynn. Critics suggest Halper's research was subpar and that the funding may have been misallocated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Reporting from our team, over at the White House. Peter Alexander is still standing by. Peter, what can you tell us? Speaker 1: Chris, this is some breaking news that Kristen Welker and myself have now confirmed according to at least 3 former Obama administration officials, we have now confirmed that president Trump, during that 90 minute Oval Office meeting that took place with president Obama here at the White House, less than 48 hours after president Trump won, when he was then president-elect Trump, was warned by president Obama against hiring Mike Flynn. This is a a piece of information that has not been reported before. It is notable because as we have heard from president Trump over the course of the last several days weeks, attacking the Obama administration as recent as today with those tweets attacking the Obama administration effectively for hiring Mike Flynn. It's notable that the Obama administration, the president, ultimately had fired Flynn. He was then serving, at the at the DIA at the time, but that this information was provided to Donald Trump in that closed forum. Another element of that conversation we know about is that president Obama warned then president-elect Trump about the concerns regarding North Korea. All of this, the backdrop for Sally Yates' testimony to take place later this afternoon. We have reached out to the White testimony to take place later this afternoon. We have reached out to the White House for any response. We have not yet heard back, but when we do, we will report that to you. Again, just to be very clear about this, NBC News has now learned from at least 3 former Obama administration officials that president Obama at the time in, it was on Thursday, November 10th, warned then president-elect Donald Trump against hiring Mike Flynn. Speaker 2: Have a timeline here that shows that, in August 7, 2014, he retires from the army after 33 years. Then in August of 15, he meets he first meets Donald Trump. And then just a month later, you've got, Stefan Halper, who you just referenced, awarded an office of net assessments contract valued at $245,000. He was paid that much money to study Russia and China. Lee Smith, tell us about that. Speaker 3: Yeah. Maria, thanks very much for mentioning Halper because I believe that he's actually the center of, the center of the Russiagate operation, and we first see him start to appear as he is targeting general Flynn. And now we understand, as miss Powell's, work on behalf of general Flynn has shown, why the deep state, why they needed to target general Flynn. Because he understood the kinds of programs that they were using and how they were misspending their money, and Halper is representative. Speaker 2: Well, he he was paid $244,000 to write a study on China and Russia. Right. Speaker 1: Is Speaker 2: that the kind of money that one gets paid for something like that? Speaker 3: I mentioned this a bit in in my book. And as it turns out, mister Alpers, his research is subpar. And no, this appears to have been money that was allocated for other
Video Transcript AI Summary
When one side consistently disregards the rules, it creates a significant issue. In such situations, we must advocate for our beliefs. There may be instances where one side attempts to consolidate power by suppressing votes, politicizing the military, or weaponizing the judiciary against opponents. In these cases, we cannot simply remain passive or uncertain. When a line has been crossed, it is crucial to stand firm and take action.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Certain set of rules. That's where you said Obama. What happens when the other side has repeatedly and abundantly made clear they are not interested in playing by the rules? It's a problem. And when that happens, we fight for what we believe in. There are going to be times potentially when one side tries to stack the deck and lock in a a a permanent grip on power, either by actively suppressing votes or politicizing the armed forces or using, the judiciary, the criminal justice system to go after opponents. And in those circumstances, pluralism does not call for us to just stand back and say, well, I'm not sure. That's okay. In those circumstances, a line has been crossed and we have to stand firm.

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

There will be consequences for those who pushed foreign interference hoaxes. The Hammer of Justice is coming.

Saved - January 14, 2025 at 1:15 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe that those who resist the President's agenda are acting as traitors and should be dismissed. They were not elected and their actions amount to subversion, which is legally punishable. The lack of accountability for past behaviors has allowed this to continue. For Trump to fulfill his promises and protect himself and his family, he must ignore these infiltrators and focus on what the majority of the country elected him to do.

@laralogan - Lara Logan

They are traitors - and every single one of them should be fired. Their job requires them to implement the President’s agenda - they were not elected by anyone. He was. And “resistance” is subversion. It is punishable by law, under 18 U.S. Code Chapter 115, TREASON, SEDITION AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES. This subversive behavior is continuing because no one was held accountable for last time. So if Trump wants to do what he promised & if he doesn’t want them maliciously targeting him & his entire family again, he will not listen to the infiltrators already surrounding him & do what he was elected to do by the majority of this country.

@JackPosobiec - Jack Poso 🇺🇸

BREAKING: Nearly Half of Federal Employees Plan to Resist Trump, Poll Finds https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/01/13/deep-state-gearing-nearly-half-federal-employees-swamp-plan-resist-trump-poll-finds/

DEEP STATE GEARING UP: Nearly Half of Federal Employees in the Swamp Plan to Resist Trump, Poll Finds A groundbreaking survey from RMG Research finds that bureaucrats in the federal government plan to act like a deep state opposing Trump. dailysignal.com
Saved - March 1, 2025 at 11:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
You clowns are at it again, trying to deflect from your guy's embarrassing mistakes by lying about a favorite target. Just to clarify, I've never met or spoken to Zelenskyy or advised him. It's disappointing that you think it's in the U.S. interest to sell out Ukraine and appease Putin.

@AmbassadorRice - Susan Rice

You clowns are up to the same old tired crap. When your guy screws up and royally embarrasses himself and the U.S., you try to change the subject and lie about a favorite target to distract and deflect. For the record, I have never met Zelenskyy and never spoken to him. Ever. Or advised him or anybody around him. It’s a shame that you contend that it is in the U.S. national interest to sell out Ukraine and suck up to Putin.

@MZHemingway - Mollie

Yesterday, Susan Rice said of the Trump-Zelensky meeting, "There is no question this was a set up." She revealed full knowledge of the mineral agreement, complained that it didn't include "concrete" security agrees (meaning, apparently, commitment of US troops on the ground if conditions merit), and then mischaracterized Trump's behavior, counting on most Americans to not have watched what transpired over the entire hour in the Oval Office. You can look at this and dismiss it as typical Democrat talking points, but you could also view it as almost a confession, one that includes details about the current "Get Trump" effort. Yes, Trump won the popular vote against unbelievable odds, but if you think Team Obama is being any less involved in quiet insurrections than they were during the first Trump administration (Russia collusion, Ukraine impeachment, etc.), you're clueless. I'll remind you that Susan Rice was in the small Jan. 5, 2017 meeting in the WH with other key Russia collusion hoax perpetrators. Zelensky repeatedly declined opportunities to sign the deal in Kyiv and Munich, and requested the meeting at the White House. It later came out that Rice and Tony Blinken, Victoria Nuland, and Alexander Vindman may have been personally advising Zelensky to do this meeting in the way he did -- that they recommended him to be hostile and to try to goad Trump into blowing up. Even though he didn't, and even though Zelensky's actions horrified many normal Americans, the Obama team went on the airwaves to falsely characterize what happened. I think their goal was to have a wonderful performance by Zelensky, an angry Trump appearing to scuttle the deal, and the support of the neocon portion of the GOP to start applying pressure on Trump to have US Troop commitments as part of the "security guarantee." It was a set-up, in Susan Rice's interesting choice of words. Instead, Zelensky had one of the worst stage performances of his acting career, and Trump was statesmanlike (against all odds) throughout. Zelensky followed Team Obama's advice to be hostile to a tee, but it didn't land how they thought it would. Surprisingly, one of the most important aspects of it not working out might have been Lindsay Graham's reaction. Had he and other neocons thought Zelensky was being reasonable, Trump would be having to fight (even moreso) the neocon portion of the GOP in addition to Team Obama's dirty tricks. Even the "conservative" neocon pundits on TV last night were admitting Zelensky had royally messed up. As you can see from the hostility of the bureaucracy to any Republican oversight, no matter how reasonable or minor it may be, the entrenched bureaucracy and permanent DC apparatus is quite active. That goes quadruple for the deep state in the Intelligence Community. I'd expect more and more shenanigans and to be prepared so that you don't fall for the next information operation. The post-WWII architecture in Europe and the US needs this war to continue or be settled on "US troops on the ground" type guarantees, even though that's not what Americans want. Things will heat up here, and it's a very dangerous time.

Saved - March 15, 2025 at 3:05 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe there is clear evidence that the FBI tried to overthrow the U.S. government for Hillary Clinton in 2016, and the CIA did the same for Joe Biden in 2020. It's time to issue warrants, make arrests, and send out subpoenas.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And this is, Trump’s Deputy National Security Advisor K.T. McFarland: “We now have black and white evidence.” BEYOND THE SHADOW Of A DOUBT that the FBI attempted the overthrow of the United States government on behalf of Hillary Clinton in 2016, And, the CIA toppled the United States government on behalf of Joe Biden in 2020, Now, issue the warrants, the arrests and the subpoenas.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims there is black and white evidence that the FBI interfered in the 2016 election and then sought to destroy the Trump administration after their candidate, Hillary Clinton, wasn't elected. They allege the CIA interfered in the 2020 election with the 51 former intel agents who dismissed the Hunter Biden laptop as Russian disinformation. The speaker asserts that US intelligence agencies and the Department of Justice interfered in past elections and will interfere in the 2024 election to protect themselves. They believe the Durham investigation and congressional investigations provide hard evidence of this interference. The speaker suggests individuals involved are terrified of a Republican president and attorney general investigating and charging them with crimes committed over the last eight years. They claim these individuals were aware of their wrongdoing and avoided putting anything in writing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now have black and white evidence that the FBI interfered in the two thousand sixteen election. And then when they failed to get their candidate elected, Hillary Clinton, then they just set out to destroy the Trump administration. So then go back and go up to 02/2020. It was the CIA this time that got involved in the two thousand twenty election with those 51 former intel agents who talked about the Hunter Biden laptop as total Russian disinformation. So they've gotten away with it for two elections. They're for sure gonna get away with it. Try to get away with it in '24. Right? Because there's no consequence. The difference is in 02/2024, the evidence is there. We now have the Durham investigation. We have all the congressional investigations. There is now hard evidence that there was election interference by The US intelligence agencies and the Department of Justice. They've got to be terrified. Those individuals have to be terrified that a Republican president comes in in the February with a Republican attorney general, investigates them and charges them all with the crimes they've committed over the last eight years. Speaker 1: Well, we'll see about that. You're right. There are questions around these elections because of this interference. Do you think there will be election interference then in '24? Speaker 0: Take it to the bank. They will absolutely interfere in 02/2024. We're not sure how, but they will absolutely interfere not only because they're not gonna like whoever the Republican candidate is, but because they're gonna protect their own hides. That's why they're they were talking to their own people, and the whistleblowers have brought this up, that they were told, don't put anything on paper. Just tell us orally. They knew that they were doing stuff wrong. They knew that they were gonna be liable for prosecution.
Saved - April 13, 2025 at 10:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been engaging with retired generals and ambassadors through a nonprofit called National Security Leaders for America, discussing the potential national security risks of another Trump presidency. Our conversations have even touched on extreme measures to protect the country from what I view as Trump’s sociopathic narcissism, driven by self-interest. It’s been a significant focus for me over the past year, as I believe it’s crucial to inform the public about these issues.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And this is, Jamie Mannina, Senior Advisor, Joint Staff, Department of Defense Fmr, Speical Agent, FBI Fmr Special Assistant Hillary Clinton: Having conversations with retired generals to explore how to overthrow the sitting President of the United States to ‘protect people from Trump.” “Trump is a sociopathic narcissist who is only interested in advancing his name, his wealth, and his fame.” “I will also confess to you that over the last most of the year, since this spring, I was working with these retired generals, retired ambassadors in this organization, this nonprofit called National Security Leaders for America. And what we were doing was we were trying to explain to the American people the national security consequences of another Trump presidency.” @JamesOKeefeIII @OKeefeMedia

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jamie Mannarino, a consultant embedded in the Pentagon working for the joint staff, is a former FBI special agent and "spy hunter" who met Hillary Clinton in college and worked for her at the State Department. He assesses Trump as a sociopathic narcissist interested only in advancing his own interests. Mannarino is in conversation with retired generals to explore options regarding Trump and had a meeting with top military leaders in a secure room called the Tank to discuss AI. Mannarino specializes in AI and emerging technologies like quantum computing. He claims the incoming Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, has a drinking problem, cheated on his wives, and has sexual assault allegations against him. Mannarino worked with retired generals and National Security Leaders for America to try to defeat Donald Trump, writing articles under their names. He predicts Trump will entertain staying in office past his term to avoid jail.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I work at this top consulting firm, and my client is the Pentagon. So I'm embedded in the Pentagon. I work in the joint staff, which is the top military command. When she lost, I went into the intelligence community, and I became an FBI special agent. Speaker 1: So I became a spy hunter. Speaker 0: So I I was a counterintelligence agent, special agent at the FBI. Speaker 2: What's your, like, overall assessment of Trump? Speaker 0: He's a sociopathic narcissist. He was only interested in advancing his name, his wealth, and his faith. Speaker 2: Is there anything you can do to, like, protect American people from stuff that he might try to do? Speaker 0: I'm in conversation with a couple of retired generals Mhmm. To try to explore what we can do. Speaker 2: Who were the the retired generals that you were gonna talk to? Speaker 0: They're like one, two, or three star generals and admirals. You probably know maybe four stars. So I also have a big day tomorrow, probably the biggest day of all. So we have this huge huge meeting with military leaders in a in a very secure room called the Tank. Oh. So we have a tank meeting at, like, all of the top top leaders in the United States military tomorrow on my on my topic that I I prepared. Speaker 2: So it went well. Speaker 0: I think it went well. Very sensitive information. We don't have to keep it between us. I specialize in artificial intelligence and emerging technologies like quantum, cyber security. Speaker 2: What's quantum? I haven't heard Speaker 0: of it. Quantum is incredibly fast supercomputing that doesn't yet exist, but will soon exist. And when it does, it will it will change everything. Speaker 2: Hag Seth. Speaker 0: Hag Seth. Speaker 2: Hag Seth. Who's that? Speaker 0: Secretary of defense. He's cheated on all his wild bones, girlfriend. He's had some sexual assault allegations. He's an alcoholic. There's a lot of observations of him drinking. You're not a spy. You're not trying to, like, collect information from me. Speaker 2: I wish I was. That'd be cool. Speaker 0: Well, with me, literally with a former FBI agent, so you're gonna go. You hear me say it. I became an FBI special agent, so Speaker 1: I became a spy hunter. Speaker 3: You're a spy hunter, Speaker 0: you say. Speaker 4: Well, I'm a spy hunter too, but I'm evidently a better spy hunter than you. Jamie Mannarino describes how he met Hillary Clinton in the mid two thousands when he was here at George Washington University pursuing a master's degree. He then followed Hillary Clinton to the state department where he worked. Speaker 0: This person I met in college was Hillary Clinton. So I met her in college, and I worked for her since college. And then when she became secretary of state, I followed her to the state department, and that's how I worked there. And then she almost won again, right, in 2016. Speaker 4: So after Jamie Mannarino worked for Hillary Clinton, he then became a special agent here at the FBI to, in his words, catch Russian spies because according to Jamie, he's a spy hunter who specializes in counterintelligence. Speaker 0: When she lost, I went into the intelligence community, and I became an FBI special agent because I was so upset. Angry. I wanted to catch Russian spies, Chinese spies, those. They had really affected the outcome I felt in Speaker 1: 2016. So I became a spy hunter. Speaker 0: So I I was a counterintelligence agent, special agent at the FBI. Speaker 3: After experiencing four years of a volatile economy, America is facing record inflation and a massive threat to the US dollar. Experts are warning the stock market could crash, and we could be facing a recession. In these uncertain times, I recommend gold to my audience, and I trust Fisher Capital as my official gold partner. Not only have my friends at Fisher delivered hundreds of millions of dollars in gold to their clients, they've also proven to be vigilant and right on the front line supporting causes that make our country stronger and better. Fisher Capital is the largest corporate partner for Turning Point USA, close friends of OMG. We appear at their events every December and continues to make sure the new administration is successful. Based on my experience and client testimonials, the team at Fisher Capital consists of some of the most caring and compassionate individuals in finance today. And when you click the link, you will qualify for an exclusive offer only available to my listeners, where you can get up to $20,000 of free silver with your qualifying purchase. When you speak with Fisher, make sure to mention that James O'Keefe sent you. Our portfolios are too important to trust to stocks and bonds alone. Protect yourself with gold today and get it from Fisher Capital. Go to Fisher0mg.com. That's Fisher0mg.com. Fisher 0 m g Com. Speaker 4: Jamie Mannarino, after working at the state department, got a job as a special adviser to the joint chiefs of staff at the Pentagon as a consultant. Speaker 0: And I work at top consulting firm, and my client is the Pentagon. So I'm embedded in the Pentagon. I work in the joint staff, which is the, top military command. Speaker 2: So your boss is the joint chief. Is that what you said? Speaker 0: Yeah. The chairman. Speaker 2: Say it right? Speaker 0: The chairman of the joint chief. Speaker 4: Jamie works at the Pentagon with senior officials there regarding artificial intelligence technologies that, to quote Jamie, don't yet exist. He says they're going to, quote, change everything, and he talks about secret tank meetings there with senior officials. He mentioned one meeting that was going to happen literally the next day. Speaker 0: I specialize in artificial intelligence and emerging technologies like quantum, cyber security. Speaker 2: What's quantum? I haven't heard of that. Speaker 0: Quantum is incredibly fast supercomputing that doesn't yet exist, but will soon exist. And when it does, it will it will change everything. So that's that's what I do. Speaker 4: In their first encounter, our undercover reporter met with Jamie inside this Spanish restaurant where we set up a hidden camera inside. I myself was in disguise sitting at the bar getting camera b, and the spy who hunts spies disclosed all the information about the secret meetings with our undercover journalist. Speaker 0: So I also have a big day tomorrow, probably the biggest today of all. So we have this huge, huge meeting with military leaders in a in a very secure room called the Tank. Oh. So we have a tank meeting with like all of the top top leaders in the United States military tomorrow on my on my topic that I I prepared. Speaker 2: Are you serious? Speaker 0: So I have to go to that meeting and it's I've waited Wait. Speaker 2: I'm getting nervous for you. Speaker 0: Waited three years. Three years. Wow. It's finally gonna happen. Yeah. So chairman of the joint chiefs is the number one military officer for The United States. Speaker 2: Okay. Speaker 0: He's leading the meeting. The vice chairman, the director of the joint staff, every commander of all the command commands. So European command, Speaker 5: Oh. Speaker 0: African command, Northern command, Southern command, Pacific command, cyber command, strategic Command, and trans transportation. Oh, and then special forces. Speaker 5: Wow. Speaker 0: Yeah. And Space Command. So they'll all be there. The chiefs of the army, the navy, the air force, the space force, and then OSD policy. So that's that's we're gonna talk about AI. Speaker 2: So what are your talking points gonna be? Speaker 0: That that this is a very serious subject. We need to take it seriously. We need to overcome a lot of bureaucratic obstacles. Speaker 4: We Speaker 0: need to work better with partners, international partners. We need to, you know, think creatively to avoid over classification, which really prohibits the ability to share information across very quickly. Everyone has a habit in the intelligence world to over classify something because they don't wanna get in trouble. So once you once you label that stop secret, no one's gonna see it. Oh. And we have to share this with another country because we need to fight together. And you can't fight together with this kind of inability to share Yeah. War fighting information. Speaker 4: Jamie, the adviser to the joint chiefs, attacked incoming defense department boss, Pete Hegseth, stating Hegseth has a drinking problem and has cheated on all his wives. Hegseth. Speaker 0: Hegseth. Speaker 2: Hegseth. Who's that? Speaker 0: He is a Fox News TV correspondent on Saturday. So Speaker 2: what is he gonna do in the government? Speaker 0: Great question. Speaker 2: What's his job be? Speaker 0: Secretary of defense. Yeah. It's possible he'll make it in. Yeah. It's possible. He also has a drinking problem. He's also cheated. He's been married three times. Speaker 5: Oh, no. Speaker 0: He's cheated on all his wives, all his girlfriends. He's had some sexual assault allegations. Speaker 2: What? Speaker 0: Yep. This is all on the news. Yeah. He's an alcoholic. There's a lot of, like, observations of him drinking. Speaker 4: Jamie Mannarino, adviser to the Pentagon, former special agent with the FBI, makes it clear what he thinks about incoming president Donald Trump. Speaker 2: What's your, like, overall assessment of Trump again? Like, if you were to do a broad take on him. Speaker 0: I mean, he's a sociopathic narcissist who is only interested in advancing his name, his wealth, and his fame. He's a lifetime of cheating. He's habitually addicted to lying about himself to advance his personal interests, and I question his loyalty to anyone but himself. Speaker 2: Uh-oh. What does it look like for you, you know, moving forward and he's the president? Does that impede what you do? Are you are you concerned about what's gonna happen with that? Speaker 0: So far, I'll be fine. But, yeah, I'm not gonna lie. I'm a I'm a little worried. Speaker 2: Okay. Speaker 0: But I'll be, for now, fine. Speaker 2: Is there anything you can do to, like, I don't know, protect American people from stuff that he might try to do? Speaker 0: I mean, I can't do anything other than my job, which is, you know, protecting American interests on artificial intelligence. Outside of that, I'm in conversation with a couple of retired generals to try to explore what we can do. I have a meeting in fact tomorrow about it. Speaker 2: Really? Speaker 0: Got me opening up myself to you already, telling you things I wouldn't normally tell. Speaker 3: In recent months, many of our fellow Americans experienced unprecedented natural disasters and damaged infrastructure, making access to health care essentials impossible at the very moment it was needed. When disaster strikes, being prepared is your best defense. And now I'm excited to share with you the brand new field emergency kit from our friends at The Wellness Company. The ultimate survival kit for any situation where medical help is not an option. Inside this rugged waterproof case, you'll find essential medications that cover over 60 conditions that you can encounter along with a detailed 85 page doctor written guidebook. This ultimate kit includes amoxicillin, an essential for treating bacterial infections and antivirals and antiparasitics like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, medications that are critical in situations where you are exposed to respiratory viruses or parasites. And for those facing potentially life threatening allergic reactions, the field kit includes epinephrine, the generic EpiPen, along with vital first aid supplies such as tourniquet and wound and burn treatments. Natural disasters are happening at record rates, so I urge everyone to get the Ultimate Field Emergency Kit from our friends and supporters at The Wellness Company by going to twc.healthomg twc. Healthomg that's twc.healthomg and now you can save 50% just by using code OMG at checkout. Speaker 4: During the next meeting, our undercover reporter asked about how the meeting inside the tank at the Pentagon went. Speaker 2: So it went well. Were there I Speaker 0: think it went well. Very sensitive information. You're have to keep it between us. You're gonna go blogging. Speaker 2: Yeah. I threw away the key. Speaker 0: Just leave the scantula. Just so that we over classify, and I think I may have said this to you during the day, is that we overclassify information. So when we overclassify information, it doesn't allow us to actually, you know, communicate effectively when we're actually trying to implement implement some sort of operation. Right? So we're playing a team sport, and we're both, like, representing a part of the field. Right? And we both have different pieces of information as to how we're gonna do our job to play the game and win. Mhmm. But we're not coordinating because we don't tell each other we need to know information. Yeah. And then the second one was, you know, the enemies. We're not the only ones using science. So the enemy is using science too. You're not a spy? You're not trying to, like, collect information from me? Speaker 2: I wish I was. That'd be cool. Speaker 0: Well, with me, literally with a former FBI agent, so you're gonna be you're gonna be safe. Speaker 4: Jamie Menina reveals he has been working with two, three, and four star generals to see what they can do about president Trump's upcoming term. Speaker 2: Who were the the retired generals that you were gonna talk to? Well, Speaker 0: there's many of them, but this rear admiral, another is a major general in the in the army. So those are the two that I talk to the most. But, yeah, I talk to quite a few. Who's in in a whole Speaker 2: Or would I know any of them? Speaker 0: No. They're like two, three two one, two, or three star generals and admirals. You probably know maybe four stars. Speaker 2: Is there one named Millie? Is that a name? Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. I he was my former boss. He doesn't know me. Oh. And he'll probably not be involved in something like this. Oh. But, yeah, he's around. Did Speaker 2: you? Yeah? Speaker 0: Yeah. Millie's around. Speaker 4: Jamie Menina told us that he was working day and night to defeat president Trump and that had Kamala won, Jamie would have received a pretty big job. Speaker 0: I will also confess to you that, over the last, most of the year, since the spring, I was working with these retired generals, retired ambassadors, and this organization, this nonprofit called National Leaders National Security Leaders for America. And what we were doing was we were trying to, like, explain to the American people the national security consequences of another Trump presidency. And I'm usually reluctant to kind of lead with this or explain this because I don't wanna overheard sound too political. This organization tried to defeat Donald Trump. We tried to engage the American public. We, you know, conducted hundreds of interviews. I, myself, wrote to publish a 10, a 20 eds and newspapers across the country. I did a lot of writing. The most writing I've done in my life. And I would write not in my name, but I would be a ghostwriter, and I would let the other general, like, you know, put their name on it. And so some articles landed in some pretty big papers, The Wall Speaker 5: Street Journal, The National Journal, all these. Speaker 0: So we're literally working day and night. Wow. Nonstop. So when and ultimately, he won, I was really, frankly, depressed. I was really sad, really depressed. Not only in terms of the mission failure, the mission failure, but, of course, I was hoping to advance my my career. Had she won, I would have gotten a pretty big job. Speaker 4: Jamie Menina, the adviser to the joint chief, stated that president Trump will entertain the idea of staying past his four year term. Speaker 0: I predict Trump will probably entertain publicly the idea of staying in office or changing the laws to stay in office, which she's not allowed to do. Yeah. Speaker 2: So, like Yeah. Speaker 0: That's a great thing. By constitution. Speaker 5: But they'll probably suggest this. Like law. Speaker 0: And there'll probably be an effort to try. Yes. And then there'll be pressure and anger, and then, Speaker 5: you know, Republicans will try Speaker 2: to Maybe I'll be like Speaker 5: They'll try to definitely anoint the meter out of him to maintain his Speaker 0: to not go to jail. Speaker 5: Oh. Because he doesn't wanna go Speaker 0: to jail. Right. That's all that matters. Speaker 4: If you're on the inside of the Pentagon or any government institution and notice corruption, reach out to us via email tips at okeefe media group dot com or text us at (914) 491-9395, and an OMG journalist will get back to you soon. Thank you, and stay tuned.
Saved - April 25, 2025 at 2:43 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve come across some alarming statements from various officials. Amjad Anton Fseisi, a senior CIA officer, claims that the CIA, including Gina Haspel and Mike Pompeo, intentionally withheld intelligence from President Trump. Nicolas Turza from the Department of Defense expresses a commitment to resist Trump, labeling him a threat to democracy. Aurel Hizmo, a Federal Reserve economist, describes Trump as unstable and criticizes Jerome Powell for not supporting economic stimulus during his presidency. I’m left questioning the roles of the FBI, DOJ, and mainstream media in all of this.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And this here is, NOTHING LESS THAN TREASON ON HIDDEN CAMERA: — Amjad Anton Fseisi, senior CIA intelligence officer, with 10 years of service at the CIA: the CIA, including Gina Haspel and Mike Pompeo deliberately withheld intelligence from the sitting President of the United States @realDonaldTrump — Nicolas Turza Department of Defense Branch Chief vows to overthrow the sitting president of the United States “ We’re Going to Resist Him, Everything He Does,” “The same guy who tried to overthrow an election is just, like, truly setting us down a path of dictatorship. Secretary of Defense is “Insanely Young” and Unfit to Lead.” — Aurel Hizmo Federal Reserve Principal Economist: “Trump is just a crazy person.” Jerome Powell’s "legacy" as “somebody who held the line against like, Trump.” “As somebody who held the line against like Trump. When Trump was president he wanted to stimulate the economy. But Powell wouldn’t do it.” Now, with all due respect, where the fuck are the FBI and the DOJ? And may legacy media rot in hell, precisely why @JamesOKeefeIII IS THE NEWS.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A CIA contractor named Amjed Fassisi, who has worked at the CIA since 2008 and also at the NSA, claims that high-ranking officials within the intelligence community, including former CIA directors Mike Pompeo and Gina Haspel, colluded to withhold information from President Trump, believing him to be an "idiot" who would disclose sensitive information. Fassisi states that Trump is under constant surveillance, including his ex-wife, and that the intelligence community used human intelligence to investigate Trump's alleged collusion with Russia. He also claims that Israel, a U.S. ally, steals intelligence. Fassisi believes Trump will not be re-elected, preferring democracy over a "fucking madman." He acknowledges the CIA and NSA don't trust each other and don't share information. When confronted with these statements, Fassisi denies making them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I work in the Public East community. I work in the CIR. I've in cyber operations. I've been doing it for a while. Speaker 1: So how long have you been working at the CIA? Speaker 0: Since 02/2008. I've also worked at MSA. Yeah. Speaker 1: And And Speaker 0: then I had a TSSCI with a full score polygraph. That means that I'm fully vetted. Speaker 2: Amjad Fassisi shows her his CIA identification badge. Speaker 1: No. Where does it say Speaker 0: It doesn't. Speaker 1: Hey. That's the point. Speaker 3: That's the point. Speaker 1: What's CMC? Speaker 0: China Emissions Center. They are really China Emissions Center. Speaker 2: Gotcha. Amjad talks about how the CIA kept information from Trump. Speaker 4: Like working. We kept we kept information from him. Speaker 1: Say one more time? Speaker 0: We kept information from him. Speaker 1: From Trump? Yes. Speaker 0: He's an idiot. Speaker 2: And there are certain Speaker 0: people that would give him a high level of review, but never give him never a you know do know why? It's called leak to those people. Speaker 2: I'm John Fassisi states a higher ups within the intel community, including CIA directors Mike Pompeo and Gina Haspel, and the upper levels of their staffs colluded to withhold information from sitting president Trump. Speaker 1: So the agencies kind of, like, all got together and said, we're not gonna tell Trump The higher ups. Speaker 0: The higher ups. We we put it this way. The the executive staff, we're talking about the director and his subordinates. Speaker 1: Like, what titles are they? They're Speaker 5: Director of the CIA. Speaker 1: Director of the CIA will keep Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: Are you guys still watching him? I would say yes. It sounds like you guys are still watching him and his team. Speaker 0: Of course of course we are. Nothing goes by without somebody watching. Speaker 2: Amjed Fassisi also states as fact that Trump is under constant surveillance and even claims they are spying on his ex wife. Speaker 0: And we also have people that monitor and say that's a lot of people. Speaker 1: So you guys had human sources. Speaker 0: How do you think we got it from Speaker 1: Like wiretapping? Is that How did you guys figure out that Trump was colluding with the Russians? Did you guys use Speaker 0: So it's just human intelligence. Speaker 1: So the intel community was able to use Pfizer to spy on Trump and his team. And that's how we found out that he was colluding with the Russians. Correct. Was it the CIA or the NSA that spied on Trump? So it Speaker 0: should be all over. Speaker 1: So you're you're saying that we you your agency Yep. Oh, a lot of Speaker 0: the agencies forget. He's not gonna get it. I'll be elected again. I've I've done the math. That's impossible. Speaker 6: We have a choice here to win that, like, Speaker 0: democracy or to do some fucking madman. Yeah. Must be a big creator. Does Speaker 1: it say the CIA on your LinkedIn? No. Speaker 0: No. No. We can't do that. And then I worked at NSA for two year for a year. Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 7: And I was doing some really cool cyber stuff, Speaker 0: which I cannot tell you about. They're the office of director of national intelligence. So I help them stand up inside our program. Speaker 2: I'm James Zockey reporting on location outside the CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia. Right behind me, the CIA, the police officers here. Speaker 0: We figured we'd come up and just say hello. Speaker 2: No problem. We're we're allowed to stand Speaker 0: here? A %. Speaker 2: Thank you. Speaker 0: Absolutely. Absolutely. Everything you guys are doing is a % okay from where you're at right now. Speaker 2: Okay. Speaker 0: If we proceed forward of the crosswalk Yeah. That's where we may have to come up and have another discussion. Speaker 2: Yeah. We're gonna stand right on the sidewalk. Percent. Absolutely. I it. Alright. Alright. Very good. Thanks a Thank you. Just a moment ago, officers coming out from Langley, Virginia to warn me not to set foot across that line right there. It's obviously dangerous for us to be here. It's dangerous for us to do this reporting. But thanks to a brave OMG undercover swiper, we present to you the O'Keeffe Media Group blockbuster investigation inside the CIA. A few months ago, journalists Matt Taibi and Michael Schellenberger released a story making several claims, including the CIA illegally mobilizing foreign intelligence agencies to target Trump advisers before the twenty sixteen election. Barack Obama's CIA director, John Brennan, identified 26 Trump associates for the intelligence community to target and bump, make contact with or manipulate. And what bumping means is literally bumping into people, making contact with them, communicating with them, and spreading misinformation to divert their attention. The US intelligence community also asked its foreign allies, United Kingdom, Australia, Italy, and the Israeli Mossad to target these 26 members of Trump's team going all the way back to March of twenty sixteen, well before the twenty sixteen presidential election. Multiple instances that The US Intelligence Officials likely broke laws against spying and election interference. Former CIA director Gina Haspel blocked the release of a binder that included evidence that may have identified her role in the Trump Russia collusion hoax. This activity was illegal, both because US law prohibits such intelligence gathering unless authorized by a foreign intelligence surveillance act, that's FISA warrant, and because the weaponization of the intelligence community for political purposes constitutes election interference. The first of the intelligence community surveillance targets appeared to be a former defense intelligence agency, that's DIA head, and would be Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn. Another target was staffer George Papadopoulos. In 2018, HPFCI, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, released a 02/1943 page report clearing Trump of allegations that he and his team colluded with Russia to interfere with the twenty sixteen election. However, sources close to the House Permanent Select Committee led by Adam Schiff covertly continued working out of a small room in Langley, and he had access to raw logs and communications from agencies like the CIA and the National Security Council. You're probably wondering how did the CIA respond to this? Well, former CIA director John Brennan under Barack Obama did not respond nor did the justice department. The US FBI and UK's equivalent to the NSA, that's the GCHQ, however, responded that wiretapping the president-elect claims were nonsense. They were utterly ridiculous and should be ignored. What's most interesting about that is Taibi and Schellenberger didn't even ask about wiretapping. The FBI and GCHQ just included it in their response. Even more interesting is how did the mainstream media report it? The mainstream narrative was that the UK government GCHQ, again, that's The United Kingdom's NSA equivalent, was the whistleblower in the investigation into the alleged ties between Trump and the Russian government and other narratives that have all turned out to be false. As it turns out, not only was Taibi and Schellenberger's reporting accurate, we can now provide proof on camera. Thanks to one of our OMG undercover American swiper citizen investigative journalists. Using the dating app Bumble and hidden cameras, our OMG journalists set up a series of meetings and phone calls with Amjed Fassisi, a CIA contractor with top level government security clearances. Now as it turns out, the corruption at the CIA, FBI, and Department of Justice is probably even worse than you thought, and now you can see it with your own eyes. We're reporting that Amjed Fassisi, a senior intelligence officer with a top secret sensitive compartmentalized information clearance, has worked at the CIA for over a decade, and his knowledge and his position in access show he has a high level awareness about the agency, its current culture, and how it has been corrupted by bureaucratic politics, and how it has over the years and continues to use its powers to weaponize the CIA to spy on president Trump. Let's meet Amjad Fassisi. Amjad Fassisi is a CIA contractor working with Deloitte. He has a high level top secret government security clearance and works within the CIA and its China Mission Center on cyber operations. According to the CIA's website, the China Mission Center was formed to address the global challenge posed by the People's Republic Of China that cuts across all of the CIA's mission areas. Through his work over the years with the CIA, NSA, and various defense contractors, Amjed Vasisi is well connected to high level government officials. What you're about to see in this video is truly incredible. Amjed Vasisi divulges on camera that the directors of the CIA, including Gina Haskell and Mike Pompeo, and other high ranking members of the intelligence community, purposely colluded to withhold information from Donald Trump, then the sitting president of The United States. I greenlit the hidden camera date as we were initially under the impression that he was working for defense contractor Lockheed Martin. But during the first meeting, our American swiper noticed that Vassisi was in fact CIA, at which point our undercover investigation took on a whole new angle. Our brave American swiper citizen journalist cultivated a rapport with Vassisi, and from there, the rest is history. What Speaker 1: wait. What do you Speaker 0: I work for the CIA. Speaker 1: You work for the CIA? That's hard to put that. What do you do for them? Speaker 0: I've been to cyber appellate, but I've been doing it for a while. Speaker 1: How long have you worked there? Speaker 0: Oh god. With so I work for Deloitte, Deloitte Consulting. Okay. So I'm a contractor to the CIA. Deloitte's, like, based out of the CIA. Okay. I also worked at MSA. Deloitte. Deloitte. I I work in a mission center at the agency. I am a program manager, political program manager company. I help the mission center across all the across the entire enterprise, everything. Speaker 2: After telling our undercover American swiper citizen journal his role with the CIA, Amjad Fassisi shows her his CIA identification badge. Speaker 0: Alright. So here you go. Speaker 1: Okay. Let me see. Speaker 0: You start. You should be discreet around, please. Speaker 1: Oh, I'm sorry. How long have Speaker 0: you worked for? So that was so that's two thousand and eight. So that was the last picture update was from 2013. Speaker 1: This is from 2013, which is more than a decade ago. No. Wait. Hold on. Where does it say this? It doesn't. Why is that? Speaker 8: It does. Why would why would Speaker 0: it But Speaker 1: how do people know Speaker 2: oh, wait. Speaker 1: I I guess. That's the point. Right? That's the point. Speaker 3: That's the point. Speaker 0: Let me see. Speaker 1: Is there like a Speaker 0: This is United States seal. Speaker 1: It's the CIA seal? Speaker 0: No. It's The United States seal. Speaker 1: Oh, but there's no it's not like a CIA seal? Speaker 0: No. We we cannot do that. What's CMC? China Mission Center, darling. Oh. You wanna do okay. I'm getting a little nervous now. Okay. Speaker 1: This is oh, so this is the agent your your your division. Speaker 0: That's my immigration center. Speaker 1: Gotcha. Gotcha. Speaker 0: Like, do you believe me now? Speaker 1: Yes. This is very legit. I like it. I got it. Speaker 0: Because we have to go through training where, like, we leave a very low carbon cyber or Internet or social media footprint. Uh-huh. I'm on LinkedIn. Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 0: I'm on Facebook. My real name Uh-huh. And the company I work for, that's it. Speaker 1: Do you does it say the CIA on your LinkedIn? Speaker 0: No. No. No. We can't do that. No. No. No. They don't Speaker 1: they don't allow you guys Speaker 4: to do that? Speaker 0: Oh, so no. Speaker 2: Omjed Vasisi also describes how you obtain top secret clearance called TSSCI. TSSCI is a subset of top secret clearance and is required for access to highly sensitive information known as sensitive compartmented information, SCI. SCI is classified information concerning intelligence sources, methods, and other sensitive matters. Speaker 0: And then I had a TS SEI with a full scope polygraph. I put TS SEI full scope, and that means that I'm fully vetted. Speaker 1: So how long have you been working at the CIA? Speaker 0: Two thousand and eight. Speaker 1: Back when you were Lockheed. Speaker 0: Correct. And then and then I worked at NSA for two year for a Speaker 1: year. Okay. Speaker 7: And I was doing some really cool cyber stuff, Speaker 0: which I can not tell you about. And then I went back to the CIA in 2011. I went to the North Of Grumman right down Speaker 1: the street. Okay. Speaker 0: Managed 80 cybersecurity practitioners. And then I went to the office of director of national intelligence. So I helped them stand there inside our threat program. They trusted me to to set that up. Speaker 1: Yeah. What exactly is inside the threat programs? Speaker 8: It's it's usually, the the biggest thing with insider threat is if somebody clicks on a link that they're not supposed to or whatever and then they infect their entire network. So does that make any sense? So so the the biggest threat of all is is the carelessness of people within your organization. So you put rules, governance rules, know, things that they have to follow so that they don't do anything stupid. Speaker 2: Not a week goes by without a news headline about potential medical supply shortages, threats to our infrastructure, or power grid. And you remember what they pulled during the last pandemic. Certain medications were mysteriously out of stock. No way will I ever let that happen again. In today's unpredictable world, it's all about being prepared for who knows what they have in store for the next pandemic. Our friends and supporters at The Wellness Company have designed this unique prescription based medical emergency kit that is packed with eight potentially lifesaving prescription only medications, including Z Pak and ivermectin, which I use myself while out on the road and starting to feel a bit under the weather. Health is everything, and this is a great opportunity to order a Wellness Company medical emergency kit. The Wellness Company medical emergency kit stands ready to treat over 30 common ailments, ensuring you'll have access to vital medications when you need them most. And now save $45 per kit when you order using the code OMG. Get ready to write this down. Get your wellness company medical emergency kit at TWC.health/OMG. That's TWC.health/OMG. That's TWC.health/OMG and save $45 per kit today when you use code OMG. Amjad Fassisi states as fact that the higher ups within the intel community, including CIA directors Mike Pompeo and Gina Haspel, and the upper levels of their staffs colluded to withhold information from sitting president Trump. Speaker 1: You said that Mhmm. He was one way if Mike Pompeo was working with the heads of the others intel agencies. Speaker 0: Mike Pompeo was a Northrop, DCR. Speaker 1: Right. And he was working with the heads of the other intel agencies to to withhold information from Trump. Speaker 0: His predecessor, Gina Haskell, did. Speaker 1: So Gina was the one who withheld information from Trump? Speaker 0: And I believe Mike Pompeo did the same thing too. Speaker 1: Mike Pompeo did the Speaker 8: same thing? Speaker 0: I believe Speaker 2: so. Amjad Vassisi states his fact that Trump would call Putin and tell him secret intelligence information. Speaker 0: He would give it away. Yeah. He'd call Vladimir Putin and tell him, it's ever done. No. I'm being serious. You ask me Yeah. I'm sorry to give you a simplistic answer, Speaker 1: but he's a fucking man. So you think Gina and Mike Pompeo worked with the heads of the FBI? Speaker 0: Believe so. I mean Speaker 1: To withhold information from Trump. Speaker 0: Yeah. So Speaker 1: the agencies kind of, like, all got together and said, we're not gonna tell Trump The higher ups. The higher ups. Speaker 0: We we put it this way. The the executive staff, we're talking about the director and his subordinates. Speaker 1: Okay. And he's serving Speaker 0: these are very smart people. Speaker 1: Like, what titles are they? Speaker 5: They're Director of the CIA. Speaker 1: Director of the CIA would Speaker 2: states as fact that Trump is under constant surveillance and even claims they are spying on his ex wife. We are assuming Amjed is speaking of Marla Maples. Speaker 1: How did you guys figure out that Trump was colluding with the Russians? Did you guys use Speaker 0: to to even intelligence. I don't I I'm not I I can't give you a certain answer. I don't have. But we have we have we have too many public issues, and we also have people that monitor his ex wife. He likes to use burner phones. Speaker 1: Can I say that one more time? I'm he likes to use what? Speaker 0: Burner phones. Burner phones. Speaker 1: What does that mean? Speaker 0: That means a prepaid phone card that's not a tax deed. It's not on the network. It doesn't ping the Speaker 1: Like a dummy phone? Like a dumb cell? Like a flip phone? Speaker 0: That's a phone number. Speaker 2: I've had it with all my personal and private information being exposed and exploited by big tech and big government. So I'm joining my friend, Eric Prince, and I'm switching to my new unplugged phone. Protect your privacy. Get your very own unplugged phone. Go to unplugged.com/0mg. That's unplugged.com/0mg. Take your privacy back. Unplugged.com/0mg. Speaker 1: Was the intel community able to use Pfizer to spy on Trump and his team? I don't know. But Speaker 0: they did a thorough investigation. The the outcome of that is in the mother report. Speaker 1: Was it the CIA or the NSA that spied on Trump? Speaker 0: So it should be all over. Speaker 1: So you guys had human sources. Like wiretapping? Is that what Okay. Speaker 0: Just like that. Speaker 1: So, like Speaker 2: As though there is not already enough controversy around Israel, Amjad Fassisi, again, a high level government contractor states he doesn't trust Israel and they, quote, steal intelligence from us. Speaker 1: Like like So for example, Speaker 0: who's written? Our our ally. Speaker 1: Who? Israel. Okay. Israel, Speaker 0: our ally. Speaker 1: Uh-huh. I Speaker 0: don't trust them. You know? Are they? They still ship from us. Speaker 1: Like, Speaker 0: Information. So do we, Battleford. Why do you ship from us? Speaker 1: Like, what kind of information? Like, weapons or Speaker 0: Weapons. Could be emulates first. Stuff we don't wanna kill. Speaker 1: So they're not really our friends? Speaker 0: Nobody's really thrilled about Russia. This side is Nobody. Speaker 1: So the intel community was able to use FISA to spy on Trump and his team, and that's how we found out that he was colluding with the Russians. Correct. Speaker 2: And as any good spy would do, Vassisi makes it clear that, quote, this conversation didn't happen. Speaker 0: This conversation didn't happen. I Of course. I did extremely deny it. Speaker 1: Yeah. That's so badass. Are you guys still watching him? Speaker 0: I would say yes. Speaker 1: It's just the intel community is still monitoring him and spying on him. We we Speaker 0: I'm not sure I would Speaker 1: And it sounds like you guys are still watching him and his team. Speaker 0: Of course of course we are. Nothing goes by without somebody watching. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: It's just rested short. I promise. Speaker 2: Amjad Vasisi, a program manager contracted at the CIA, talks about how the CIA kept information from Trump. Amjad also discloses that the directors of the CIA would give Trump high level overviews, but never give him any details. Vassisi also spills that all the intelligence agencies thought that president Trump was a, quote, fucking dumbass and would disclose information, unquote. When asked how do you keep information from president Trump, our subject says, quote, don't give it to him. Speaker 4: Like working. We kept information from him because we knew he fucking disclosed it. Speaker 1: Say that one more time. Speaker 0: We kept information from him. Speaker 1: From Trump? Do we have proof for that? Speaker 0: No. But we all believe because he's the biggest fucking idiot. Speaker 1: So you're you're saying that we you your agency CIA Speaker 0: A lot of the agencies. But Speaker 1: kept information away. Not Speaker 0: yes. Because we knew that we we'd be careless with Speaker 1: it. Yeah. Speaker 0: Like, store has been a pack showers Speaker 2: or walking. Is that how it's like? Speaker 1: So you guys would on purpose keep certain information away from Trump. Speaker 0: He said he said said absolutely very easy. He other than any videos. No idea. Speaker 1: So the generals or like Every everybody. Yeah. They would just not share anything with him. Speaker 0: We all did. We all thought he was fucking cheap dumbass. Speaker 1: Who's weak? Speaker 0: All the anti intelligence agents. Speaker 2: In full on bureaucratic elitist fashion, Amjed Fassisi describes the only people in the CIA that support Trump are rednecks that live in the sticks and brainwashed stupid idiots. Speaker 0: Yeah. There are some people that live in sticks. Like who? Speaker 1: Are you kidding me? Speaker 0: Rednecks who live out and then they go up there wearing the sticks. Speaker 1: Like, how would you describe those people who still support trauma? These like, after what happened on Brainwashed. Brainwashed? Brainwashed stupid, illiterate. Speaker 2: Aumjed Fassisi with the CIA states there is, quote, no way Trump will get elected again. Speaker 0: He's not gonna get it. I'll be elected again. I've I've done the match. I've done Speaker 1: a hustle. Yeah. Speaker 2: But there are more Speaker 0: or less than there are though. Speaker 6: We have a choice here. Speaker 0: Do we want our democracy or do we want some fucking madman? Yeah. Must be a dictator. Speaker 2: Omjen Vasisi states as fact that the NSA, CIA, and other departments within the intel community don't trust each other, therefore, don't share information. Does the Speaker 1: CIA work with the NSA? Speaker 0: No. Because they're very territorial. Just don't like sharing information. That is our fucking problem. We don't share information called NSA has outed, gotten a lot of achievement, CIA, but now killed. So the CIA is rare. So what did they share with the NSA? Speaker 1: The NSA is careless? Speaker 2: Yeah. Possible violations of the law here include obstruction of justice by deception, conspiracy to obstruct, false statements, that's 18 USC 1,001. The actions of the directors and the executive staff of the CIA might even trigger violations of the espionage act. Some of these trigger felony provisions, other trigger misdemeanors. That depends upon how serious the prosecutor thinks the violation is. Depends upon what his exact contracting status was, within which federal silo he really was, other specific regulations specific to the agency he worked under, CIA, etcetera, may be triggered, which could include things like insubordination or engaging in misrepresentation. He has no problem divulging all this to a strange woman after a few cocktails, but clammed up when I asked him. We had a chance to review your badge, and it this the one that you it says you worked for the CIA. And, you know, Michael Schellenberger and Matt Taebe did some reporting about the information that was held from Trump from Trump. It's actually a crime for the director of the CIA to withhold information from Trump. No. Speaker 0: I I I have no idea. Every everything that's I didn't condone this to me. I I don't know. I have no intel. I have no knowledge. Speaker 2: You said that we, quote, keep information from him. Speaker 0: That. I I I never You didn't say that. I did not. Speaker 2: Quote, we kept information from Trump. He's a fucking idiot, quote unquote. Those are your words. Speaker 0: I can I can have a opinion, but I I don't Speaker 2: know? Can I talk can I sit down and talk to Speaker 0: you some time about this, please? No. No. Speaker 2: I think it's important that I get your comment. No. It's that's everything is untrue. It's untrue? Speaker 0: I don't know. I don't I have no idea. I how why would I know? Speaker 2: Why would you know? Do you do you work do you work at Seattle? I can't tell you that. Do you work at Deloitte? Yes. Okay. Are you a program manager at Deloitte? Yes. Do you work at the Chinese Mission Center in Langley, Virginia? Speaker 0: I can't tell you that. Speaker 2: You can't tell me that. Have you told other people that? I can't tell you that either. And stay tuned for follow-up, including my conversation and interaction with Amjad Fassisi released soon. The fact that our intelligence agencies withheld high level information to a sitting US president poses more questions than answers. It would be completely illegal for them to do this. It corroborates the reporting done by intrepid investigative reporters Michael Schoenberger and Matt Taibi. But rarely do you get this sort of thing on tape so that everyone can see it. The American people are being left in the dark because of the agencies, the leadership, the administrative state we have in place are at war and odds with each other. We need more people like this citizen journalist, this brave American swiper. We need more whistleblowers and sources inside these agencies to come forward and really expose what's going on with incontrovertible evidence like documents and video recordings. The time for sitting on the sidelines is over. To quote Edmund Burke, all that is required for the triumph of evil is for good people, that's you, to do nothing. You can sign up today to become a citizen journalist and American swiper by going to okeefmediagroup.com/swiper. You could donate to us. We have a new five zero one c three nonprofit called Citizen Journalism Foundation. Videos like this are brought to you by Citizen Journalism Foundation. It's fully tax deductible. Go to citizenjournalismfoundation.com. You could DM us tips at tips.okeefmediagroup.com into our signal number (914) 315-9415. You can DM us on Instagram and x. All this goes far beyond the point of partisan politics. The powers that be ask us to focus on what divides us. But as I said after I was raided by the FBI, what unites us is so much more powerful than what divides us, and we should all be united that this is wrong. The enemy might be out there, but corruption is alive and well in our country. America, our war is here. To quote Abraham Lincoln, America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter or lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes the former president tried to overthrow an election and is setting the U.S. down a path of dictatorship. They consider him illegitimate, generally immoral, and a breaker of norms, vowing to resist everything he does. The speaker expresses concern about the Department of Defense being responsible for the president's safety, given that some may believe he is illegitimate and immoral. James O'Keefe is reporting live in front of the Pentagon at the Air Force Memorial in Arlington, Virginia.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Same guy who tried to overthrow an election. He's he's just, like, truly setting us down a path of dictatorship. He's illegitimate. He's generally immoral, breaking every norm. We're gonna we're gonna resist him. Everything he does. I'm a very patriotic person, and I've never been a patriotic person. Now the reason this is concerning, the Department of Defense is often directly responsible for the president's safety in the event of travel, events, campaign rallies, everything else. What's your least favorite thing about John? Oh, that he's that he utterly lacks any moral conviction. The worst thing about him is his utter lack of moral conviction. The second worst thing about him is how stupid he could be. Should the president's safety be entrusted with people who believe that he is illegitimate and immoral. And here we have a field trip. Let's take a look. People are coming in. Hello, everyone. How you doing? Hello. This is James O'Keefe reporting live in front of the Pentagon at the Memorial Air Force Memorial here in Arlington, Virginia. Stay tuned.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 believes Trump is a "dumb guy." Speaker 1 asks if the feeling towards Trump is neutral. Speaker 0 says she wants to be remembered in history as someone who held the line against Trump and helped the economy. When Trump was president and wanted to stimulate the economy, she started raising rates, doing the opposite of what Trump wanted. The feeling is that they don't want Trump in the government.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Trump is is such a crazy person. It's it's very clear. I mean, he's dumb guy. Speaker 1: Does he hate Trump? And, like, is the feeling neutral? Of course. Of She Speaker 0: wants to be remembered in history as well. As somebody who held the line against, like, like Trump and, like, somebody who, like, helped the economy. Yeah. And Trump was president. He wanted to stimulate the economy. Right. But he wouldn't do it. And he started raising rates, doing the opposite that Trump wanted. So, I mean, so the feeling is this, that, like, we don't want Trump to be in the clean government. Right.
Saved - May 5, 2025 at 12:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I detailed how Adam Schiff allegedly conspired with various CIA directors to undermine the U.S. government and President Trump from 2016 to 2019. I noted that the impeachment of Trump in December 2019 was initiated by a memo from a CIA analyst, based on hearsay, which relied on a report from the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project, funded by USAID. I concluded that the CIA's actions, purportedly aimed at overthrowing the government, were supported by taxpayer money through USAID.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And here it is — all in black and white: Adam Schiff conspired with CIA Director John Brennan to overthrow the United States government in 2016 and then, right out of a small room in Langley, covertly conspired with CIA Director Mike Pompeo to overthrow the sitting President of the United States @realDonaldTrump in 2017, And Conspired with CIA Director Gina Haspel, OCCRP, and USAID to topple the United States government in 2019. @shellenberger “It's a crazy story — The House of Representatives impeached, President Trump in December of 2019. Many people may may not remember that it was a CIA analyst who was left over from the Obama White House who wrote the memo that led to the impeachment. It was all based on hearsay. The person had not actually been in the room with Trump. Nonetheless, this memo that he wrote relied heavily on a report done by an organization funded by USAID. In fact, its initial founding funding I mean, now it's $10s of millions of dollars had gone into this group called the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project, a name that's not very memorable, OCCRP, but it was basically created as an extension of the state department and then of USAID.” In other words, the CIA attempted to overthrow the U.S. government in 2016, attempted to overthrow the sitting president in 2019, and succeeded in 2020 — all funded by USAID through the extortion of the American taxpayer.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Michael Flynn, a former Defense Intelligence Agency head and Trump national security advisor, was an intelligence community surveillance target, as was staffer George Papadopoulos. The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPFCI) released a report in 2018 that cleared Trump of colluding with Russia to interfere in the 2016 election. Sources close to the House Permanent Select Committee, led by Adam Schiff, continued working covertly out of a small room in Langley. They had access to raw logs and communications from agencies like the CIA and the National Security Council.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The first of the intelligence community surveillance targets appeared to be a former defense intelligence agency, that's DIA head, and would be Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn. Another target was staffer George Papadopoulos. In 2018, HPFCI, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, released a 243 page report clearing Trump of allegations that he and his team colluded with Russia to interfere with the twenty sixteen election. However, sources close to the house permanent select committee led by Adam Schiff covertly continued working out of a small room in Langley, and he had access to raw logs and communications from agencies like the CIA and the National Security Council.
Video Transcript AI Summary
A Substack article claims USAID and the CIA helped orchestrate Trump's impeachment. According to the article, the House of Representatives impeached President Trump in December 2019 based on a memo written by a CIA analyst held over from the Obama White House. The memo relied heavily on a report by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP), an organization funded by USAID. The article claims OCCRP was created as an extension of the State Department and USAID. The author asserts that USAID is about regime change abroad, a public-facing version of CIA operations. The author concludes that USAID was involved in regime change both abroad and at home, creating a predicate for Trump's impeachment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You have this new piece on Substack that the USAID and the CIA helped orchestrate Trump's impeachment? Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, Jesse, it's a crazy story. I mean, you might forget that, you know, the House of Representatives impeached, president Trump in December of twenty nineteen. Many people may may not remember that it was a CIA analyst who was left over from the Obama White House who wrote the memo that led to the impeachment. It was all based on hearsay. The person had not actually been in the room with Trump. Nonetheless, this memo that he wrote relied heavily on a report done by an organization funded by USAID. In fact, its initial founding funding, I mean, now it's tens of millions of dollars had gone into this group called the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project, a name that's not very memorable, OCCRP, but it was basically created as an extension of the State Department and then of USAID. And as you know, Jesse, this is very serious to be involved in an effort to do regime change at home as we've been discovering as the files have come out with the what Elon Musk has been doing, we know that USA USAID was really about regime change abroad. It was a kind of public facing part, you know, regime change operation like CIA, but not covert, more overt. Well, now you see a similar blowback just like they did censorship abroad and brought censorship tools back home. They were doing this sort of thing abroad, creating a predicate essentially for Trump's impeachment. I think it's, just one of many revelations that we'll see coming out in the next few weeks. Speaker 0: So USAID was involved in regime change abroad and here at home. Very interesting. If you want to read more about what Mike's talking about, go to his Substack after the show. Don't go right now. Go after the show. Thanks, Mike.
Saved - July 21, 2025 at 4:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe Americans will soon discover how, in 2016, intelligence was politicized by influential figures in the Obama Administration. This was part of a prolonged effort to undermine President Trump, subverting the will of the people and threatening our democratic republic. Here’s the explanation:

@DNIGabbard - DNI Tulsi Gabbard

🧵 Americans will finally learn the truth about how in 2016, intelligence was politicized and weaponized by the most powerful people in the Obama Administration to lay the groundwork for what was essentially a years-long coup against President @realDonaldTrump, subverting the will of the American people and undermining our democratic republic. Here’s how:

Saved - July 21, 2025 at 1:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve uncovered alarming documents showing that Obama ordered an intelligence assessment linked to efforts to undermine President Trump. This ties him directly to the Crossfire Hurricane operation, revealing a long-term scheme to destabilize a duly elected president. The mainstream media is more concerned about the implications for John Brennan than the serious breach of democratic norms. This situation calls for accountability, and I believe we must pursue prosecution against Obama to uphold the integrity of our political system.

@WCdispatch_ - Walter Curt

🚨NEW: A Former President Ordered The Intelligence Assessment, What Happens Next? “The documents show Obama himself ordered it; how does America deal with a former president trying to overthrow the next one?” Obama’s own Presidential Daily Brief now ties him directly to the Crossfire Hurricane cabal, proving the same intelligence operatives who launched the Russia hoax were running a years‑long covert operation to kneecap President‑elect Trump. “This is the biggest scandal in American history—a more than decade‑long coup to topple a duly elected president.” The mainstream press is panicking, whining that Tulsi Gabbard’s disclosure “puts targets on John Brennan’s back,” when the real outrage is that a former president orchestrated an attempted overthrow of his successor. That shreds every notion of peaceful transition and demands prosecution under national‑security exemptions to the statute of limitations. The reality is we do not have a choice, we must arrest Obama. Accountability is mandatory, not optional. 🇺🇸

Saved - July 24, 2025 at 11:05 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a video featuring Amjad Anton Fseisi, a senior CIA officer, who expressed doubts about a politician's reelection chances, claiming to have done the math. I discussed how high-ranking officials in the intelligence community, including former CIA Directors Mike Pompeo and Gina Haspel, allegedly colluded to withhold information from President Trump during his administration. I also pointed out claims of conspiracies involving Adam Schiff and others to undermine the government, culminating in significant political events from 2016 to 2020.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And this is: — Amjad Anton Fseisi, a senior CIA intelligence officer, with 10 years of service at the CIA and top-secret sensitive compartmented information clearance, caught on hidden camera. “He’s not gonna get reelected again. I’ve done the math.” — The higher-ups in the intel community, including CIA Directors Mike Pompeo and Gina Haspel and the upper levels of their staffs colluded to withhold information from the sitting President of the United States @realDonaldTrump during his first administration. In other words: Adam Schiff conspired with CIA John Brennan to overthrow the United States government in 2016 and then, right out of a small room in Langley, covertly conspired with CIA Director Mike Pompeo to overthrow the sitting President of the United States in 2017. In 2019 conspired with CIA Director Gina Haspel, OCCRP and USAID to topple the United States government in 2019 via Eric Ciaramella— Impeachment Hoax Number One. And in 2020 successfully overthrew the United States government. 📝By the way: @JamesOKeefeIII is the news.

Saved - July 24, 2025 at 10:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discuss a serious situation involving a conspiracy by 51 intelligence officials, members of Congress, and corporate media to undermine the U.S. government. Key figures like Robert O’Brien, Gina Haspel, and William Barr were aware of the potential disinformation from Giuliani but proceeded anyway. My Twitter account was targeted by those orchestrating this disinformation campaign, which I believe is one of the most significant in U.S. history. I assert the need to decertify the 2020 election.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Here it is: Twenty minutes of seditious conspiracy on tape by the intelligence community, the 51 intel officials, Democrat members of Congress, and the U.S. corporate media—who conspired to effectively overthrow the United States government on behalf of an incapacitated vegetable. Including: Trump National Security Advisor Robert O’Brien, CIA Director Gina Haspel, Director of National Intelligence Joe McGuire, White House Counsel Pat Cipollone, and Attorney General William f**king Barr. All while FBI Director Christopher Wray had the evidence the entire time. President Trump was warned that Giuliani’s information was likely Russian disinformation—by National Security Advisor Robert O’Brien, CIA Director Gina Haspel, Director of National Intelligence Joe McGuire, White House Counsel Pat Cipollone, and Attorney General William f**king Barr. Washington Post In other words: My Twitter account was obliterated by the same bastards who were running one of the greatest disinformation campaigns in U.S. history—second only to the Obama Russian collusion conspiracy hoax—simply for saying that the intelligence community effectively overthrew the U.S. government on November 3, 2020. Decertify 2020.

Saved - August 21, 2025 at 6:04 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A retired senior CIA officer with 30 years of experience revealed that psychological operations typically used against foreign adversaries were repurposed to influence the American public and undermine Donald Trump. He stated that these tactics aimed to reverse the 2016 election outcome and prevent Trump's re-election in 2020. This officer, who served in high-risk areas, emphasized that the manipulation of information not only targeted Trump but also jeopardized the national security interests of the American people.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

A Senior CIA officer for 30 years confirms the psychological operations they use overseas were turned against Donald Trump and the American People to keep Democrats in power “An intelligence agent, now retired, very senior. He looked me in the eye and said, the truth of the matter is, we took the playbook for psychological operations and information warfare that we would use against our enemies, and we turned it against the American people to undo the 2016 election and to make sure they didn't elect Donald Trump in 2020. Now, that is a senior intelligence officer with more than 30 years of experience, a patriot who served in some of the most dangerous parts of the world, and he understood that the tactics of making something fake look real were ripped right out of our intelligence communities. Our intelligence agencies not only harmed Donald Trump, they were harming the American public, the national security interests of the American public”

Video Transcript AI Summary
"You wanna talk about an insurrection? This is a insurrection against the American people that was thwarted at multiple times." "He looked me in the eye and said, the truth of the matter is we took the playbook for psychological operations and information warfare that we would use against our enemies, and we turned it against the American people to undo the twenty sixteen election and to make sure they didn't elect Donald Trump in 2020." "Now that is a senior intelligence officer with more than thirty years of experience, a patriot who served in some of the most dangerous parts of the world, and he understood that the tactics of making something fake look real were ripped right up our out of our intelligence communities." "Our intelligence agencies not only harm Donald Trump, they were harming the American public, the national security interest of the American public."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You wanna talk about an insurrection? This is a insurrection against the American people that was thwarted at multiple times. Speaker 1: I sat across from an intelligence agent, now retired, very senior. He looked me in the eye and said, the truth of the matter is we took the playbook for psychological operations and information warfare that we would use against our enemies, and we turned it against the American people to undo the twenty sixteen election and to make sure they didn't elect Donald Trump in 2020. Now that is a senior intelligence officer with more than thirty years of experience, a patriot who served in some of the most dangerous parts of the world, and he understood that the tactics of making something fake look real were ripped right up our out of our intelligence communities. Our intelligence agencies not only harm Donald Trump, they were harming the American public, the national security interest of the American public.
Saved - August 21, 2025 at 3:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Rosa Brooks, a former Pentagon official, called for a military coup against Trump just ten days after his inauguration in her Foreign Policy article. She suggested that military leaders might refuse to obey certain presidential orders, emphasizing their oath to the Constitution. This notion reflects a broader strategy within the government to undermine Trump, using tactics similar to those employed in foreign regime changes. The narrative against Trump was propagated through various media and organizations, with American taxpayers unknowingly funding anti-Trump efforts. The Russia Collusion Hoax is seen as a key element in exposing these operations.

@TheIntelSCIF - The SCIF

OBAMA PENTAGON OFFICIAL CALLED FOR MILITARY COUP against Trump just 10 days after becoming president. Rosa Brooks, daughter of a left-wing anti-war activists and wife of a U.S. Army Special Forces officer not only called for a military coup against Trump, she even wrote about it in an article in Foreign Policy Magazine named, "3 Ways to Get Rid of President Trump Before 2020," January 30, 2017. Just 10 days after Trump's inauguration. Rosa actually had a fourth option. A military coup against Trump. It reads: "The fourth possibility is one that until recently I would have said was unthinkable in the United States of America: a military coup, or at least a refusal by military leaders to obey certain orders... After all, military officers swear to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, not the president. For the first time in my life, I can imagine plausible scenarios in which senior military officials might simply tell the president: “No, sir. We’re not doing that,” to thunderous applause from the New York Times editorial board." - Rosa Brooks Rosa Brooks worked for many NGOs and as a high-level Pentagon official from 2009 to 2011 under the Obama administration, who served as a Counselor to Under Secretary for Policy Michele Flournoy, one of the Pentagon's highest ranking civilians. This is where the plan started to go into action from within our own government against President Trump and specifically relates to the weaponization of our government and the Russia Collusion Hoax and many, many others. They never thought they would lose the election in 2016. They weren't prepared. The same military tactics used to topple foreign countries for regime changes was then directly used against the American population, not just in our government against Trump, but throughout all of mainstream and social media, using a variety of tactics and propaganda to create a narrative to destroy and undermine President Trump, molding and shaping views and opinions to gain favor of others and dislike and undermine Trump. This is where USAID, front companies, NGOs, the mainstream media, social media platforms, etc., were running operations against Americans and American tax dollars were paying for it all. The American people were unknowingly paying for anti-Trump propaganda to be used on themselves, were being censored, bank account access in other countries was being denied, riots and protests were established all over the country, etc., and they were all designed in an attempt to successfully complete a military coup against Trump and his administration along with his supporters. The Russia Collusion Hoax is opening the doors to every operation and crime the deep state, the Clintons, Obama, Soros, and others have all been involved with and is why this case is so important in general. You are being given every piece to the puzzle, the evidence, the proof, and the complete timeline of events leading all the way up to the present day, in order to help awaken the population to understand the big picture for when the trigger is pulled. FP article by Rosa Brooks/Credit: @MikeBenzCyber https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/01/30/3-ways-to-get-rid-of-president-trump-before-2020-impeach-25th-amendment-coup/

Video Transcript AI Summary
Pillars of support are the institutions and groups that sustain and legitimize a political system. 'Media outlets, religious organizations, educational institutions, civic groups, the business sector, and others. These institutions or pillars can uphold undemocratic political systems by providing different kinds of support.' These can include the military or police, bureaucrats, media, faith leaders, civic groups, and the business sector. For example, 'businesses may fund or advertise in support of a particular candidate or policy platform that marginalizes groups based on identity.' The discussion cites New York Times piece and says 'Why isn't the military standing up to Trump?' noting 'Trump was betrayed by Mark Esper' and 'Trump was betrayed by Mark Milley.' They reference Rosa Brooks' 'three ways to get rid of Trump before 2020' and that 'the fourth possibility is one that until recently I would have said was unthinkable in America, a military coup.' They allege USAID has overseen a takeover of independent investigative journalism through OCCRP and label activities as 'information operations' and 'hack and leak operations' involving Hunter Biden laptop and Russiagate hoax.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Pillars of support are the institutions and groups that sustain and legitimize a political system. These can include the military or police, bureaucrat Speaker 1: And this is why you have things like The New York Times. You guys remember the just this week, the New York Times had that piece. Why isn't the military standing up to Trump? This is, like, part of their tactic, and this is what they did in Trump one. Trump was betrayed by Mark Esper. Trump was betrayed by Mark Milley. Trump was betrayed by his military. We used to think the military would stand up to Trump. This is their plan, was to go after the military. And this is why Rosa Brooks, from the same Maria Stephan mafia, Rosa Brooks, three ways to get rid of Trump before 2020. Trump's first week in office. What did Rosa Brooks, the former undersecretary of defense for policy under Barack Obama's Pentagon, and then she started the integrity project. She says so it's called three ways to get rid of Trump before 2020, published in January 2017, ten days into Trump Trump's term, how to get rid of Trump before the next election, how to take Trump down. This is the number three in charge of the Obama military. It's called three ways to get rid of Trump, but if you scroll down, this is in fucking foreign policy she wrote this. It's called three ways to get rid of Trump, but she wrote ten days into Trump's presidency. Actually, there's a fourth way. I didn't put it in the title of the piece, but since you're here, here's the plan. The fourth possibility is one that until recently I would have said was unthinkable in America, a military coup. She calls for a fucking military coup against the guy who has just just became president ten days ago. And she's the one who did who who was the head of the transition integrity project to do the democratic transition. She's the one who plotted working with Black Lives Matter and paying Black Lives Matter so that they would be receptive to a Biden call to take to the streets in case it was contested election, and they needed street muscle. And she was the number three at the Obama Pentagon. Now she's a spook at Georgetown teaching democratization studies at Georgetown Law. And from there, from that Georgetown Brookings network, she openly called for a military coup. So that's that's part of what they want here. Speaker 0: Media outlets, religious organizations, educational institutions, civic groups, the business sector, and others. These institutions or pillars can uphold undemocratic political systems by providing different kinds of support. For example, businesses may fund or advertise in support of a particular candidate or policy platform that marginalizes groups based on identity. Speaker 1: So so here they are going after the advertising money because they support a candidate. So getting business so this is how you have all this pressure put on businesses. This is what we were up against. All this, you know, you get debanked. The advertiser money disappears off of YouTube. The advertising money disappears off of the entire conservative media space. It's because groups like these were fucking working with the businesses in the background, saying if you wanna do business with the party, if you don't wanna get screwed by our government when we take power, then in support of the advertising money. Speaker 0: Businesses may fund or advertise in support of a particular candidate or policy platform that marginalizes groups based on identity. Faith leaders may offer moral support to certain leaders while socializing antidemocratic ideas and feel for rhetoric to demonize political opponents. Speaker 1: So that's why we control the churches, so that we get the churches to tell people to vote for our little blob puppet. Speaker 0: Civic associations such as unions, lobbying groups, and volunteer associations may mobilize members to support an undemocratic candidate or policy. Speaker 1: And the irony, banned books. They're the ones fucking banning speech on the Internet. Speaker 0: Without these pillars of support, an unjust undemocratic political system weakens or collapses. Knowing when and how to target these pillars as part of a pro democracy movement requires skill and strategy. Speaker 2: You say in your testimony, psyop tactics being used by The US and UK military against the American people. That is really scary stuff reading that. Could you elaborate? Because I think the American people need to hear I mean, they need to hear about this. Speaker 3: Yeah. I mean, we now know what happened, which is that basically after the war on terror, The United States used counter terrorism, counter insurgency, counter populism tactics first in The Middle East as part of the Arab Spring uprisings, then in Eastern Europe as part of the color revolutions, using social media to foment revolutions against places that we wanted regime change, and then using censorship in places to repress conflicting opinion in places that we were trying to stabilize. Those tactics were then turned against the American people after the populist revolutions of twenty sixteen. First, saw Russiagate, the idea this wild conspiracy theory that president Trump was somehow controlled through a sex blackmail operation by the Russians. But then we also saw, know, a very elaborate effort to do exactly what they had done abroad, creating, small committees of experts to decide what the truth was and demand censorship on the basis of it. But I also mentioned there's also these proactive influence operations, the most dramatic of which is the Hunter Biden laptop, severely illegal, but we also saw the mobilization of the intelligence community. And now in the latest study article that we published today, we have documented that the Agency for International Development has overseen basically a takeover over the last decade and a half of independent investigative journalism in Europe and around the world through OCCRP and supposedly independent journalism organizations with an eye to basically controlling the information and controlling the major news media that do investigative journalism. Thank you, mister chairman. And mister chairman, Speaker 2: thank you so much for the work that you have done over the last couple of congresses on this issue. Speaker 4: Mister Schellenberger, can you explain how you traced USAID funding that served as the basis for whistleblower report in 2019, which led to the impeachment of president Trump. Speaker 3: Sure. Well, you may remember that the, the so called whistleblowers in the White House was actually a CIA analyst. And in that whistleblower's complaint, which led to the impeachment, one of the central pieces of evidence was created by a USAID funded and controlled organization called the OCCRP. And we have another piece out today about how it participated in the Russiagate hoax as well, creating essentially very important information leading to that. So I mean, you have in USAID a much larger fund of money and a much broader strategy for information control that included censorship, but also, as I mentioned, taking control of investigative journalism really worldwide. I mean, its ambitions were, you know, amazing. So yeah. I mean, that's a that's an agency when when we saw that get shut down by Doge, I thought that was completely appropriate. If there's something in there that it was doing that's valuable, then you could refund it later. But my view, same thing with CISA, death penalty for organizations that participated in violations of the first amendment like CISA. Cybersecurity is an extremely important function. It shouldn't be contaminated and and undermined by censorship activities. Speaker 4: I think it's always been known that our government has funded the change in administrations, if we can say it politely, of other governments. But isn't it borderline treason when the taxpayer is when when organizations entrusted with protecting our country are now undermining our own government? Speaker 3: Absolutely. I mean, if you're trying to do regime change, illegal if you're weaponizing DHS, FBI, CISA, that's that's treasonous regime change activities redirected, you know, that you developed abroad, that we developed abroad for regime change directed against the American people and the and our representatives. I mean, it's shocking, and we still haven't dealt with it as a country. Speaker 5: Mister Schellenberger, you mentioned that USAID, which has been in the news of late, spending, taxpayer money and all kinds of stupid things, is also involved in the censorship effort. I want you to just elaborate on that a little bit because this is going on as we speak. I want you to elaborate on that for the committee, if you would. Speaker 3: Yeah. I mean, I think it's important to understand that USAID viewed this very holistically. And it's important that if you look at the Hunter Biden laptop case, which is an extremely important case to understand, because the FBI was weaponized, then it weaponized the Aspen Institute Yep. To brainwash the entire media. It wasn't just that they censored it. It was that they changed the perception of the laptop. They they they they created the perception that it was something other than what it obviously was. And that's what these guys are trying to do. These are called information operations. And USAID has been in the process of taking over so called independent investigative journalism around the world, and at the same time then training NGOs how to demand censorship. For example, mister Aaron's organization has been working to train organizations to so called flag misinformation behind the scenes. By the way, it's one thing to criticize somebody publicly, which we should all be engaged in. Yeah. But this thing where you're skulking around We do that all the time. Secretly yeah. That's that's what open democracy is. This thing of going out and, like, secretly flagging information behind the scenes and demanding censorship, that is such a that's completely an abomination. That is not what Speaker 5: our democracy You're saying USAID, your investigation is now engaged in this prebunking kind of concept and and and process that they did with the laptop story in the 2020. Speaker 3: And it's the exact same approach as well, where often what they're doing, for example, with USAID, OCCRP is that they're they're leaking intelligence from the intelligence agencies in a very and not like WikiLeaks where they just dumped it, I think probably too much without without the proper redactions, but they're strategically leaking it and then manipulating places like The Guardian and The New York Times to publish certain stories and control the whole investigative news process. Speaker 5: And we saw this from from Yole Roth's testimony. He testified during these weekly meetings that they communicate federal law enforcement communicated to us there was gonna be hack and leak operations before the presidential election, likely in in October. We had these repeat so that what's gonna happen? When it's gonna happen? And then they said here who it's gonna involve, that the rumors that the hack and leak operation would involve Hunter Biden. So they set them all up, and then Marisa? Exam they'd set them all up because they had the laptop and they knew what was coming. And when it happens, everyone buys into what the 51 former intel official say.
3 Ways to Get Rid of President Trump Before 2020 Why you need to read the 25th Amendment now. foreignpolicy.com
Saved - August 26, 2025 at 12:52 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Norm Eisen, a key advisor to Barack Obama, confessed to leading a Color Revolution against Trump, claiming it was part of a long-term strategy to undermine the U.S. government. He revealed that he orchestrated a coup through the State Democracy Defenders Fund, established after the 2020 government overthrow.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Here it is: Barack Obama’s consigliere, Norm Eisen, admitted to waging a Color Revolution against Trump as part of a years-long plot to overthrow the United States government—yet again. • He admitted to orchestrating a multi-faceted coup against President Trump through his State Democracy Defenders Fund, formed immediately after the overthrow of the United States government in 2020.

Video Transcript AI Summary
State Democracy Defenders Fund formed after stopping the attempted coup of twenty twenty and began on January 7, 2021, combining the most successful coup fighters with anti-autocracy experts. They studied Hungary, Turkey, Poland, Brazil, and the Czech Republic to understand why autocracy failed or succeeded there. They emphasize that "It's not just litigation. Litigation is very important in our peaceful, lawful, vigorous effort." They describe three guardrails: "Think of litigation, the courts as the first guardrail"; "The next one is political leadership"; and "the third and maybe the most important... The people." They note protests doubling in 2025 versus 2021, and launched The Contrarian, with Jen Rubin quitting the Washington Post and I quitting CNN, reaching "600,000 subscribers" in two months. They recount cases like blocking Elon Musk out of the Treasury, which produced an order. They forecast a 2026 ballot wipeout and argue Trump and Musk are unpopular.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My organization, the State Democracy Defenders Fund, we were born out of the success in stopping the attempted coup of twenty twenty. And I kind of got the people who I admired the most. I worked representing multiple parties fighting in court, but also in the court of public opinion in that unsuccessful effort to reverse the legitimate outcome of the twenty twenty election. I got the best people together who I thought were the toughest, the smartest and who won a lot in 2020. And we added in building our organization. We started this immediately after. This work started on January 7, this new work, 2021, right after the coup failed when the the violent insurrection that Trump inspired on January 6 was defeated. I started combining the most successful coup fighters that I came across in my work in 2020 with experts who had helped study or defeat autocracy internationally. So we went to places over the intervening years, like Hungary and Turkey, where the effort to oust an autocrat failed. Why did it fail? What did they fail to do? But we also looked at places like Poland, Brazil, Czech Republic, the country where I served as ambassador, where there were successful ousters in recent years of autocratic regimes. And we came together over that four year period with a plan to defeat autocracy. It's not just litigation. Litigation is very important in our peaceful, lawful, vigorous effort. Think of litigation, the courts as the first guardrail. Donald Trump has been loudly banging into that guardrail in this, over a 150 cases where we and others have had so many wins. Because we've been winning, that guardrail is holding. But that loud banging is waking up two other barriers that lie two other guardrails that lie on the other side of litigation. The next one is political leadership, where we've seen in The United States that elected officials mostly at the state levels like the state AGs, they've been going to court but they've been talking, holding town halls, speaking to the American people. Now Congress is starting to get in the act. So that's a second layer of protection. The third and maybe the most important, and this is the difference. This is why autocracy was defeated in Poland and why it is still there down the block in Hungary. The people. When you awaken the American people, which that loud banging in the first guardrail has done. Do you know that there's twice as many protests in 2025 as there were in 2021. 2021 was covered as the era of big protest against Donald Trump. There's actually been more in 2025. Another thing we've done is, we've incubated the an independent publication at Democracy Defenders. It's called The Contrarian. Jen Rubin quit the Washington Post. I quit the CNN, and we started the contrarian. In two months, we've got 600,000 subscribers. We're the first publication in America to have a beat on the democracy movement where we cover all of these protests sometimes hundreds a week. It's everything from town halls where people of both parties are telling congressmen and senators, why are you going along with authoritarianism that's hurting us? It's hurting the American people. The veterans services are being gutted. People are angry about that. Schools are being gutted. Safety for our air and water and our vaccines. There's a measles epidemic. The people are angry. But also smaller protests like spontaneous in front of Tesla dealerships. And one of my cases, got had a case locking Elon Musk out of the treasury department. I was getting ready to go to court. I turned on the television and a spontaneous protest had erupted in front of the treasury department in support of my case, keep Elon Musk out of treasury. We did get that order blocking him out of treasury. And then suddenly, I see members of congress are showing up at the protest because they didn't wanna be left out. So those are the next two after the litigation. Political opposition, the treetops, but the American people, the grassroots. And when those three things combined together, authoritarianism and autocracy doesn't have a chance. And I think you're gonna see a wipeout at the ballot box, for example, with the House of Representatives in 2026 because people just don't like this autocratic regime. Donald Trump is very unpopular. Most unpopular president except for Trump won at this point in his tenure, and Elon Musk, his co president, is absolutely hated by the American people. He has abysmal popularity ratings.
Saved - November 8, 2025 at 2:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read a claim alleging sedition by Barack Obama and every co-conspirator from the White House down. It quotes DNI Gabbard saying Obama ordered the overthrow after 2016 in favor of Hillary Clinton, lists numerous officials and entities, accuses them of manufacturing the “Russian collusion” hoax to topple the government and oust Trump, and cites a coverup by Christopher Wray—Watergate pales beside it.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Here it is: Just thirty-eight seconds of Barack Obama——sedition—and every single co-conspirator involved, from the White House down. Director of National Intelligence @DNIGabbard: “Barack Hussein Obama ordered the overthrow of the United States government on behalf of Hillary Clinton after the 2016 election was over—after the American people said no, we want Donald Trump to be our commander in chief, not Hillary Clinton.” Barack Hussein Obama: JOHN BRENNAN, JAMES CLAPPER, JAMES COMEY, SUSAN RICE, LORETTA LYNCH, SALLY YATES, LISA MONACO, HILLARY CLINTON, ADAM SCHIFF, ANDREW MCCABE, PETER STRZOK, LISA PAGE, BRUCE OHR, NELLIE OHR, ROBERT MUELLER, ROD ROSENSTEIN, ANDREW WEISSMANN, VALERIE JARRETT, BEN RHODES, JOHN CARLIN, MARY MCCORD, JAMES BAKER, JONATHAN MOFFA, MICHAEL KORTAN, DAVID LAUFMAN, SAMANTHA POWER, JOHN KERRY, DENIS MCDONOUGH, JIM RYBICKI, BILL PRIESTAP, CHRISTOPHER STEELE, RICHARD DEARLOVE, ALEXANDER DOWNER, STEFAN HALPER, JOSEF MIFSUD, SERGEI MILLIAN, SIDNEY BLUMENTHAL, CODY SHEARER, TERRY MCAULIFFE, JONATHAN WINER, JOHN PODESTA, HUMA ABEDIN, ANTHONY WEINER, CHERYL MILLS, HEATHER SAMUELSON, JAKE SULLIVAN, ROBBIE MOOK, DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, PETER KADZIK, RACHEL BRAND, MATTHEW AXELROD, MARY JACOBY, PREET BHARARA, JOSH CAMPBELL, JENNIFER PALMIERI, SIR ANDREW WOOD, ROBERT HANNIGAN, ALEXANDRA CHALUPA, MICHAEL SUSSMANN, DMITRY ALPEROVICH, and officials from the DNC, CrowdStrike, Fusion GPS (including Glenn Simpson), and Perkins Coie (including Marc Elias) and don’t you dare forget about the coverup—Christopher Wray. —all manufactured the “Russian collusion” conspiracy hoax, a years-long seditious conspiracy with the sole intent of toppling the United States government during the 2016 presidential election and of overthrowing the duly elected president in 2017. Watergate? not even close!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 says that over the last several weeks they declassified and released documents exposing that President Obama and leaders in the intelligence community knowingly manufactured a false intelligence document after the 2016 election. The document alleged that Russia aspired to help President Trump win the election with the aim of undermining his presidency and usurping the will and the voices of the American people who sent Trump to the White House.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We look at where we are now over the last several weeks. We've declassified and released documents that exposed how president Obama and leaders in the intelligence community knowingly manufactured a false intelligence document after the twenty sixteen election was done, after the American people said, no, we want Donald Trump to go and be our commander in chief, not Hillary Clinton. And this manufactured document alleged that Russia aspired to help president Trump win the election with the aim of undermining his presidency and usurping the will and the voices of the American people who sent Trump to the White House.
Saved - February 1, 2026 at 2:43 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I summarize the post as claiming that declassified CIA documents and George Soros emails prove Hillary Clinton conspired with the intelligence community and Soros to overthrow the U.S. government in 2016, with Obama allegedly ordering an Olympic-level report to smear Trump and tie him to Russia. It says the effort continued through impeachments, investigations, and culminated in a 2020 overthrow.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And here it is: More damning declassified documents and emails released by @CIADirector reveal Hillary Clinton conspired with the intelligence community and George Soros to overthrow the United States government in 2016: Documents declassified by CIA Director John Ratcliffe—at the Olympic level. Emails from George Soros’ Open Society Terrorist Foundation: “It will be a long-term affair to demonize Putin and Trump,” approved by HRC—Hillary Rodham Clinton—“to tie Trump to Russia as a means of distracting people from her own missing emails, especially if the affair reaches an Olympic level. For now, it serves to provide a post-convention bounce. Later, the FBI will be right there to add more oil to the fire.” In other words—yes indeed—Barack Hussein Obama was right there, taking it to the Olympic level by ordering a newly manufactured ICA report—as part of a seditious conspiracy to overthrow the United States government in 2016 and a long-term effort to overthrow the duly elected president of the United States @realDonaldTrump in 2017. Followed by two impeachments, multiple investigations, arrests, indictments, raids, two assassination attempts, and ultimately, the overthrow of the U.S. government in 2020. Any questions?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript discusses a set of emails and intelligence claims regarding the 2016 U.S. election and the narratives surrounding Russia, Hillary Clinton, and the Trump campaign. It states that documents contain emails allegedly from the senior vice president of the George Soros Open Society Foundation. One email quotes a Clinton campaign adviser saying, “it will be a long term affair” and to “demonize Putin and Trump,” and adds that, “later, the FBI will put more oil into the fire.” Other emails are said to reveal that Hillary Clinton approved the idea of tying Trump and Russia to election interference, describing it as a scheme hoping the allegations would distract people from her own email scandal. The documents are presented as providing clear evidence that Hillary Clinton’s campaign was behind the Russia hoax, and that the FBI knew what the Clinton team was up to, acknowledging that the information they were receiving about the Trump campaign may have come from the Clinton camp. Despite these claims, the transcript asserts that the Obama-era intelligence community proceeded with a 2017 assessment concluding that Russia aspired to help Trump win the election.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The documents contain emails allegedly from the senior vice president of the George Soros Open Society Foundation. He quotes a Clinton campaign adviser saying, quote, it will be a long term affair and to demonize Putin and Trump, and adds that, quote, later, the FBI will put more oil into the fire, unquote. Other emails reveal Hillary Clinton approved the idea of tying Trump and Russia to election interference, and that was a scheme hoping the allegations would distract people from her own email scandal. These documents provide clear evidence that Hillary Clinton's campaign was behind the Russia hoax and that the FBI knew what the Clinton team was up to acknowledging that the info they were receiving about the Trump campaign may have come from the Clinton camp. Despite this, the Obama intel community forged ahead with their 2017 assessment concluding that Russia aspired to help Trump win the election.
View Full Interactive Feed