reSee.it - Related Post Feed

@AllBiteNoBark88 - The White Rabbit Podcast 🐇

💥BREAKING💥 𝗟𝗼𝗼𝗸 𝗮𝘁 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗥𝗼𝘆𝗮𝗹 𝗔𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝗖𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗴𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗣𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗽𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗵𝗲𝗱 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗔𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝗱𝗼𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘀!! This explains the increased disease/deaths and long Covid in three paragraphs. "Multiple studies have shown an increased risk of myocarditis after vaccination with mRNA encoding SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. mRNA vaccines can result in spike protein expression in muscle tissue, the lymphatic system, cardiomyocytes and other cells after entry into the circulation. 𝙍𝙚𝙘𝙞𝙥𝙞𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙬𝙤 𝙤𝙧 𝙢𝙤𝙧𝙚 𝙞𝙣𝙟𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙢𝙍𝙉𝘼 𝙫𝙖𝙘𝙘𝙞𝙣𝙚𝙨 𝙙𝙞𝙨𝙥𝙡𝙖𝙮 𝙖 𝙘𝙡𝙖𝙨𝙨 𝙨𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙘𝙝 𝙩𝙤 𝙄𝙜𝙂4 𝙖𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙗𝙤𝙙𝙞𝙚𝙨. 𝘼𝙗𝙣𝙤𝙧𝙢𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙮 𝙝𝙞𝙜𝙝 𝙡𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙡𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙄𝙜𝙂4 𝙢𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩 𝙘𝙖𝙪𝙨𝙚 𝙖𝙪𝙩𝙤𝙞𝙢𝙢𝙪𝙣𝙚 𝙙𝙞𝙨𝙚𝙖𝙨𝙚𝙨, 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙢𝙤𝙩𝙚 𝙘𝙖𝙣𝙘𝙚𝙧 𝙜𝙧𝙤𝙬𝙩𝙝, 𝙖𝙪𝙩𝙤𝙞𝙢𝙢𝙪𝙣𝙚 𝙢𝙮𝙤𝙘𝙖𝙧𝙙𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙤𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙄𝙜𝙂 4-𝙧𝙚𝙡𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙙𝙞𝙨𝙚𝙖𝙨𝙚𝙨 (𝙄𝙜𝙂4-𝙍𝘿) 𝙞𝙣 𝙨𝙪𝙨𝙘𝙚𝙥𝙩𝙞𝙗𝙡𝙚 𝙞𝙣𝙙𝙞𝙫𝙞𝙙𝙪𝙖𝙡𝙨." And "There are clear implications for vaccine boosting where these and similar observations relating to COVID-19 vaccination and the incidence of long COVID-like symptoms are substantiated, adding further to public health officials’ concerns. Understanding the persistence of viral mRNA and viral protein and their cellular pathological effects after vaccination with and without infection is clearly required. Because COVID-19 VACCINES WERE APPROVED WITHOUT LONG-TERM SAFETY DATA AND MIGHT CAUSE IMMUNE DYSFUNCTION, it is perhaps premature to assume that past SARS-CoV-2 infection is the sole common factor in long COVID." And There is concern that COVID-19 vaccination per se might contribute to long COVID, giving rise to the colloquial term ‘Long Vax(x)’.22 The spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 exhibits pathogenic characteristics and is a possible cause of post-acute sequelae after SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 vaccination. Link to the publication sent to General Practitioners in Australia in comments below 👇👇👇

@AllBiteNoBark88 - The White Rabbit Podcast 🐇

https://www1.racgp.org.au/ajgp/2024/april/long-covid-sufferers-can-take-heart?fbclid=IwAR0_LO6qgqBlf-Of5kix-wpuAVmNDtk1tYm4LJyIx-Rvn3SeFbEDGo3bK0c

Long COVID Sufferers can take heart This article acknowledges the increased knowledge, acceptance and awareness of long COVID but emphasises the need for more guidance on handling and diagnosing long COVID and supporting patients. www1.racgp.org.au

@HouseLyndseyRN - Lyndsey, RN 💜🐭

🚨BREAKING NEWS🚨 Twice-Censored Landmark COVID-19 Vaccine Autopsy Study Fully Peer-Reviewed and Published •After enduring relentless censorship, our systematic review linking COVID-19 vaccines to death is now available for the entire world to read  by: NICOLAS HULSCHER, MPH @NicHulscher NOV 17, 2024 •The largest COVID-19 vaccine autopsy study to-date, providing robust evidence that COVID-19 vaccines can cause death, has been officially republished following successful peer-review in the journal Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law: A Systematic Review Of Autopsy Findings In Deaths After COVID-19 Vaccination •This comes after unethical censorship on two occasions: first, removal from Preprints with the Lancetand later, withdrawal by Elsevier after publication in Forensic Science International •Background: The rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines, combined with a high number of adverse event reports, have led to concerns over possible mechanisms of injury including systemic lipid nanoparticle (LNP) and mRNA distribution, Spike protein-associated tissue damage, thrombogenicity, immune system dysfunction, and carcinogenicity •The aim of this systematic review is to investigate possible causal links between COVID-19 vaccine administration and death using autopsies and post-mortem analysis •Methods: We searched PubMed and ScienceDirect for all published autopsy and organ-restricted autopsy reports relating to COVID-19 vaccination up until May 18th, 2023 •All autopsy and organ-restricted autopsy studies that included COVID-19 vaccination as an antecedent exposure were included •Because the state of knowledge has advanced since the time of the original publications, three physicians independently reviewed each case and adjudicated whether or not COVID-19 vaccination was the direct cause or contributed significantly to death •Results: We initially identified 678 studies and, after screening for our inclusion criteria, included 44 papers that contained 325 autopsy cases and one organ-restricted autopsy case (heart) •The mean age of death was 70.4 years •The most implicated organ system among cases was the cardiovascular (49%), followed by hematological (17%), respiratory (11%), and multiple organ systems (7%) •Three or more organ systems were affected in 21 cases •The mean time from vaccination to death was 14.3 days •Most deaths occurred within a week from last vaccine administration •A total of 240 deaths (73.9%) were independently adjudicated as directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination, of which the primary causes of death include sudden cardiac death (35%), pulmonary embolism (12.5%), myocardial infarction (12%), VITT (7.9%), myocarditis (7.1%), multisystem inflammatory syndrome (4.6%), and cerebral hemorrhage (3.8%) •Conclusions: The consistency seen among cases in this review with known COVID-19 vaccine mechanisms of injury and death, coupled with autopsy confirmation by physician adjudication, suggests there is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death •Further urgent investigation is required for the purpose of clarifying our findings •Our study indicates that the COVID-19 injectable products must undergo an immediate Class I recall by the FDA to protect public safety •The U.S. Food and Drug Administration defines a Class I recall as: “A situation in which there is a reasonable probability that the use of or exposure to a violative product will cause serious adverse health consequences or death.” •The censorship and retraction of studies that show COVID-19 mRNA injection harms is deeply concerning •First, this study was inappropriately removed from Preprints with the Lancet (SSRN) •The paper was posted on the server on July 5th, 2023 and censored in less than 24 hours after receiving massive numbers of downloads and reads, "because the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology."

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The toxic, prefusion-stabilized spike protein from COVID-19 genetic injections has been found in the brain, adrenal glands, heart, and blood of injured and deceased individuals—providing unequivocal evidence that these injections are NOT safe for human use.

@McCulloughFund - McCullough Foundation

Autopsies Prove Widespread Dissemination of Vaccine Spike Protein Across Various Organs and Tissues New study amplifies call for routine autopsies in individuals who have died following COVID-19 vaccination, which must include Spike protein staining. Read article by Epidemiologist @NicHulscher on Courageous Discourse: https://bit.ly/3CGayjN #MFScholar

Bitly | Page Not Found | 404 bit.ly

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

THE COVID INJECTIONS CAUSE AGGRESSIVE (TURBO) CANCERS EN MASSE: A MEGA-THREAD SHOWCASING THE OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE OF AN UNTHINKABLE HORROR THAT WILL TOUCH US ALL (1/57+)🧵 (Stick this thread on any post with a Community Note saying the injections don’t cause turbo cancers.) Thread index: Tweets 1–16: Physicians, Scientists, and Industry Experts—from the U.S., U.K., Canada, Germany, and Sweden—Describe How the COVID Injections Cause Turbo Cancers The injections— -Severely degrade the immune system, particularly causing T-cell suppression -Are adulterated with DNA plasmids, which contain the notorious SV40 promoter sequence, which has not only been associated with oncogenesis, but also binding with P53 a.k.a. “the guardian of the genome” -Are associated with far more aggressive cancers than what was normal prior to the injections’ rollout -Are associated with increasing rates of cancers Tweets 17–23: Anecdotal interviews with people describing aggressive cancers in themselves, their friends, or family members who’ve taken one or more COVID injections. Tweets 24–39: Evidence in the scientific literature and regulatory documentation that supports the idea that the COVID injections degrade the immune system, are capable of causing aggressive cancers, and contain DNA and SV40 contamination. Tweets 40–47: A—small—sample of the VAERS reports linking the COVID injections to various types of cancers. Tweets 48–57: Users on X speak out about themselves, family, or friends who developed an aggressive, often fatal, cancer following receipt of one or more COVID injections. NOTE: Please add your own COVID injection–related “turbo cancer” story to this thread to bolster the already overwhelming evidence that it is indeed a real phenomenon. —----------------------- DR. DAVID RASNICK—“I’m convinced that the true explanation of what’s behind turbo cancer is that these [COVID] injections…are devastating the immune system…[and] now we’re seeing a consequence of that devastated immune system.” In this first tweet, we start by hearing from cancer and AIDS research titan Dr. David Rasnick, who notes in a 2024 interview with Children’s Health Defense that this phenomenon of “turbo cancers” is new, and is defined by cancers that appear and grow to Stage 3 or Stage 4—i.e. “lethal”—in a matter of months. Rasnick, who earned a PhD in chemistry from the Georgia Institute of Technology in 1978, has more than 20 years of experience in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries, published numerous scientific papers, and invented novel laboratory techniques, notes that these turbo cancers are also affecting younger people than usual, including people in their 20s. “When it [the turbo cancer] develops, they get late stage cancer and they’re dead really, really quickly,” Rasnick says. “That is new.” Furthermore, Rasnick says the only other time these kinds of rapid-growing cancers have been observed was in lab animals that were made to be immune deficient “by design.” “I’m convinced that the true explanation of what’s behind turbo cancer,” Rasnick says, “is that these [COVID] injections…these mRNA and DNA genetic injections…are devastating the immune system…[and] now we’re seeing a consequence of that devastated immune system.” Rasnick adds, “Once your immune system is really, really depressed, now these things [cancers] can develop rapidly.” The cancer researcher adds, “We’re basically doing to human beings what we did to laboratory animals: We’re destroying their immune systems to the point where they can’t resist the cancer. And the cancers are now growing like they are in cell culture. They don’t have anything impeding their ability to proliferate.”

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(2/57) DR. RYAN COLE — “[These shots]...cause immune suppression. They cause a disruption and dysregulation of your immune system that normally is what would fight cancer.” In this clip from a 2023 interview with Greg Hunter, Dr. Ryan Cole, a board-certified pathologist and founder of Cole Diagnostics Inc. in Boise, Idaho, says that he saw early warning signs of immune system suppression following the rollout of the COVID injections and warned people that they “suppress the immune system.” Cole notes that the injections “alter the way your immune system works.” He adds that they “[put] your T cells to sleep” in such a way that they can’t perform their “surveillance” duties “to fight cancer.” The veteran pathologist adds that he has traveled the world, talking to oncologists, pathologists, family doctors, et al., who say that they’re “seeing cancers…in age groups…never seen before, and it happened after the rollout of the shots.” Cole adds that insurance datasets and some countries’ disability data confirms the huge uptick in cancers. In the U.K., for example, Cole says that in 2021, there was a 6–7% rise in cancers; in 2022, there was a staggering 35% increase. “Those are the types of data that we’re seeing that [are] really concerning,” Cole adds.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(3/57) DR. ROGER HODKINSON— “The immune system has been taken off its watch…[there could be] a tsunami of…cancer and other conditions that have been brought on…by this vaccination program.” In this clip from a 2022 interview with the RAIR Foundation, Dr. Roger Hodkinson, a medical specialist in pathology, a graduate of Cambridge University, and a Fellow at the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (FRCPC), echoes Dr. Ryan Cole’s concerns regarding the COVID injections’ deleterious effects on the immune system. “One of the primary functions of the immune system is to surveil the entire body, looking for little, tiny cancers that can be knocked off before they get to a size when they produce a lump or a syndrome that kills you…[And] with the [COVID] vaccination, having a profound impact on the vitality of our immune system, the deep concern is that some of these cancers that are being reported, or maybe all of them, are due to immune escape,” Hodkinson says. The pathologist adds, “the immune system has been…taken off its watch…and the cancer has been allowed to proliferate in a way that it would not normally have done.” Hodkinson goes on to note: “[This] could result in a tsunami of…cancer and other conditions that have been brought on…by this vaccination program.” He adds, “When…something of this magnitude…is not studied, that is cause for enormous concern. Because that is not the way medicine works.”

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(4/57) SCIENTIST KEVIN MCKERNAN—”The EMA…has documents that have leaked showing a one to 815-fold variance in the amount of DNA contamination that are in these vaccines.” In this clip from a presentation given to the International COVID Summit in 2024, Kevin McKernan, Founder and Chief Scientific Officer of Medicinal Genomics, as well as former R&D lead of the Human Genome Project, describes how there is “DNA contamination” in the mRNA COVID injections from both Pfizer and Moderna. McKernan notes that there is DNA plasmid contamination of between one and 815-fold from injection lot to injection lot (i.e. batch to batch) and that the contamination has been found by scientists in multiple states in the U.S. and in Germany. (The one to 815-fold figure means that the amount of DNA plasmids present in a given injection is up to 815 times the allowable amount set by regulatory agencies.) McKernan notes that regulators have, in turn, been forced to respond to the contamination and that the FDA in the U.S., the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and Health Canada have all confirmed that there is indeed DNA plasmids in the COVID mRNA injections. McKernan notes that the regulators have also confirmed that this DNA contamination includes the so-called “SV40 promoter,” which is a DNA sequence derived from the Simian Virus 40 that enhances gene expression. I.e. the SV40 promoter helps to import the contaminating DNA plasmids into the nucleus of the cell. Furthermore, McKernan notes that the inclusion of the SV40 in the contaminating DNA plasmids was originally withheld from the regulators by Pfizer. Note that, as outlined in the documentation in tweet 39 in this mega-thread, an FDA guidance document published back in 2010 states the following: “Residual DNA might be a risk to your final product because of oncogenic [i.e. cancer causing] and/or infectivity potential. There are several potential mechanisms by which residual DNA could be oncogenic, including the integration and expression of encoded oncogenes or insertional mutagenesis following DNA integration.”

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(5/57) PROF. ANGUS DALGLEISH—“[The] synthetic DNA contamination…in…vials of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines…presents risks of genomic instability, which can manifest as cancers…” Professor Angus Dalgleish, a professor of oncology at St. George’s, University of London, describes in a presentation given to the Special Council at Port Hedland Town in Western Australia in 2024 how the DNA contamination found in the COVID mRNA injections by McKernan, et al. “can manifest as cancers, immune disorders, and hereditary diseases.” “Synthetic DNA contamination as detected in Australian vials of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines by David Speicher presents risks of genomic instability, which can manifest as cancers, immune disorders, and hereditary diseases,” Dalgleish says. “The vaccines contain lipid nanoparticles, which encapsulate synthetic DNA fragments. These nanoparticles deliver this DNA into various organs throughout the body, where the DNA has the potential to integrate into our own genetic material. As such these vaccines are not ‘vaccines,’ they are, in fact, gene therapy based. This genomic integration, as the scientific literature makes clear, can lead to cancer development, immune system disruption, and more. The sheer levels of contamination detected…in some cases are extraordinary, and far beyond what should be allowed in any medicinal product.” Dalgleish goes on to note: “While this may sound like a remote possibility…we are already seeing evidence of these effects in real patients. In my work as an oncologist in the U.K., I started to see a disturbing trend as early as February 2022. Patients who had been cancer free for many years were suddenly relapsing with aggressive, explosive cancers shortly after receiving booster doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. I personally counted six cases in as many weeks in patients who developed a rapid progression, having been completely stable, with zero disease, having been on an immunotherapy I had given them 5, 8, 10, 15, 18 years ago.” Dalgleish adds: “All these patients only had one thing in common, and that was they had all been forced to have a [COVID-injection] booster by their GPs on the grounds they were at risk. One of the most unsettling aspects of the nature of these cancers is that they are not slow progressing…they are aggressive, often presenting at advanced stages, affecting multiple organs by the time they are diagnosed. Colorectal cancer has specifically shown explosive growth—something we’ve never seen before. These cancers are emerging faster and more virulent than we would expect in patients who otherwise have been stable.” Dalgleish also notes a rise in blood cancers, such as leukemias and lymphomas, which have “appeared shortly after vaccinations.” “I have had many colleagues and patients express concerns about the timing of these cancers following what I believe are totally unnecessary boosters, which is not an isolated issue,” the oncologist goes on to say. “My own research has shown that the boosters suppress the T cell response and switch[es] the antibody response to tolerizing. That means this is the perfect example where you have switched off the policing of foreign invaders, viruses, etc. and cancer, allowing it to grow uncontrolled.”

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(6/57) DR. UTE KRÜGER—“Ultimately, I saw a correlation that the tumors appeared on average three [3] months after these so-called ‘vaccinations.’” In this clip from an interview with klaTVEnglish from 2024, Dr. Ute Krüger, a pathologist and breast cancer researcher in Sweden, describes her experience witnessing the exact same phenomenon Dr. Angus Dalgleish did in the previous tweet: explosive, aggressive cancers that appeared in cancer patients who were previously stable prior to receiving one or more COVID injections. Krüger describes how, following the rollout of the COVID injections, she began to see the largest tumors she had ever seen in her career. “And the tumors simply grew more aggressively, and there were more frequent occurrences, [meaning] relapses,” Krüger adds. The pathologist and breast cancer researcher notes: “Patients may have been tumor free for 20 years, and then a few months after these injections against corona, the tumor suddenly came back. And with such aggressiveness that the patients often died as a result.”

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(7/57) DR. JOHN CAMPBELL, describing the work of DR. DAVID SPEICHER—“The Moderna [injection] can contain up to 10 [trillion] copies of DNA fragments per dose.” In this clip from a video posted in October 2024, Dr. John Campbell, a semi-retired nurse lecturer, describes work performed by molecular virologist Dr. David Speicher, which found that in some of the COVID injection vials, there are 10 TRILLION copies of the DNA plasmids. Campbell notes that 3 to 10 copies is “enough to cause incorporation of SV40 DNA contamination into the nuclear genome of the cell, thereby causing a mutation, which has been identified in cell cultures in chromosomes 9 and 12, including an oncogene that can potentially cause cancer.”

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(8/57) DR. ANGUS DALGLEISH (PT. 2)—“The Pfizer [injections] are all full of SV40 [and] SV40 was what, in my day, we put into mice to make them grow tumors…” Here is Professor Angus Dalgleish once again, this time in a clip taken from a discussion with Charles Kovess et al. from December of 2024. Dalgleish notes the following: "It's obvious talking to everybody and all the presentations I've been to....[that] they're [the COVID injections] all completely contaminated. They're just not fit for purpose," Dalgleish says. "The Pfizer [injections] are all full of SV40 [and] SV40 was what, in my day, we put into mice to make them grow tumors so we could pour chemotherapy into them to see if it worked for the tumors. And we are putting this into humans for a disease that hasn't killed anybody for at least two years. It is beyond belief, and that's really what I cannot understand."

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(9/57) DR. SUCHARIT BHAKDI—“The integration of any foreign gene into your chromosome can cause cancer immediately.” Sucharit Bhakdi, a retired Professor Emeritus of Medical Microbiology and Immunology and former Chair of the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, describes in this clip taken from a conversation with Children’s Health Defense from May 2023 how the integration of foreign genes into a person’s genome can lead to cancer. Bhakdi notes that mRNA injections cause this type of damage because “the [DNA] plasmids, these foreign genes derived from bacteria, stolen from bacteria, enter the human cells, and…every cell that is genetically altered is doomed.”

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(10/57) KEVIN MCKERNAN (Pt. 2)—“This SV40 component…it interacts with P53 [which] is [the] guardian of the genome that’s supposed to keep our genome intact…[and] it’s the most cited gene in cancer.” In this clip from an interview Kevin McKernan did with Bret Weinstein, he notes that the SV40—which has been firmly established as being present in the DNA plasmid contamination in the COVID injections—interacts with P53, a gene that is commonly referred to as “the guardian of the genome.” “This SV40 component…it interacts with P53 [which] is [the] guardian of the genome that’s supposed to keep our genome intact,” McKernan says. “And now we have billions of these molecules being injected that we know interact with that.” Furthermore, McKernan adds that P53 is “the most cited gene in cancer,” and “if you mess with P53, you’re inviting cancer, particularly if you shut it down.” The scientist also notes that simply having fragmented DNA inside the cytosol of cells—that is, the liquid portion of the cytoplasm within a cell, where many biochemical reactions occur—is enough to cause cancer; meaning the DNA doesn’t even need to be imported into the nucleus of the cell. “It [the plasmids] doesn’t have to get into the nucleus to cause cancer. Just cytosolic presence of DNA like this can trigger this cGAS STING pathway,” McKernan notes. (The cGAS-STING pathway is an innate immune signaling route that detects cytosolic DNA to trigger an immune response, including inflammation and an antiviral defense.)

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(11/57) DR. JANCI LINDSAY— “LNPs have been found to cause cancer cells that are already present to more readily spread by inducing endothelial leakiness.” In this clip from a presentation given for the World Council for Health, posted in 2023, toxicologist and molecular biologist Dr. Janci Linsday describes the nine (or more) ways the mRNA COVID injections can cause cancer. In her presentation, Lindsay notes that: –the injections use lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), which have been found to cause cancer cells that are already present to spread more readily –the LNPs may be oncogenic by themselves –the SV40 is a “super promoter” that is “great at driving gene expression,” and should it sit above an oncogene, you could have “an amplification of a cancer gene.” –the spike protein can interact with, and suppress, P53, the aforementioned “guardian of the genome.” –the injections can produce “frame shifted” proteins, which are aberrant and can themselves cause cancer –the mRNA in the injections itself can reverse transcribe into the genome, in turn causing insertional mutagenesis and cancer –the injections cause immunosuppression of T cells, which, in turn, can damage the immune system and lead to cancer (as previously mentioned in the thread)

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(12/57) KEVIN MCKERNAN (Pt. 3)—“We have sequencing from a colon [tumor] biopsy from a patient who was four [4] times vaccinated…we can find [Pfizer-injection DNA] plasmids in there at a hundred copies per cell.” In this clip from a 2024 Mind & Matter podcast, we hear again from scientist Kevin McKernan, who describes finding the DNA plasmids from Pfizer’s mRNA COVID injection in a colon tumor from a—now deceased—individual who received four injections. ​​”We have sequencing from a colon biopsy from a patient who was four [4] times vaccinated. A year after vaccination, they had a colon cancer. They biopsied it that day, and then 30 days later, they died, and then they biopsied after, and we have sequencing on both the pre-mortem and post-mortem samples," McKernan says. The scientist and entrepreneur, often cited as the first person to find DNA contamination in the mRNA COVID injections, adds, "we can find plasmids in there a hundred copies per cell. They're not exactly the same as Pfizer's, which is a real head-scratcher, but they're in there." McKernan goes on to say: “The copy number alone suggests that these things aren't fully fragmented. Right? These plasmids really shouldn't be replicating to a hundred copies per cell." McKernan adds, "They shouldn't be in there at that level because if you just do the math on how much is in the vaccine, when you do an injection of this, this person has four vaccines...1.2 ml of Pfizer...went into about 87,000 mls [of] body volume. So you should have a massive dilution into your body. Yet when we're sequencing this and doing qPCR off the tumor, the CTs coming back off the tumor are almost as high as they are straight out of the vial."

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(13/57) RETIRED PHARMA R&D EXECUTIVE SASHA LATYPOVA— “The FDA was fully aware that these things would cause cancer because they’ve written numerous guidance documents [saying so]; that’s how they regulate industry.” In this clip from an interview with Dr. Drew from 2024, retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova describes how the "FDA was fully aware that these things [the COVID injections] would cause cancer, because they've written numerous guidance documents [saying so]; that's how they regulate industry.” Latypova notes that in “2015, 2013, even more recently than that, they wrote extensive guidance documents explaining to manufacturers who wanted to develop mRNA products that they need to study...cancer..." "They had this knowledge and they told manufacturers you have to study these risks and you have to exclude them and they were also not allowed to even study it in healthy volunteers because it was considered unethical," Latypova adds. "It was considered too dangerous. So then we come to 2020 [and] all of the sudden all of this is solved—this is a joke. To me, that's where I became extremely suspicious..." One such FDA guidance document referenced by Latypova is linked in tweet 39 of this mega-thread.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(14/57) DR. JAMES ROYLE— “In addition to the increase in all-cause excess deaths in highly vaccinated countries since the gene based–injectable rollout, there has been observed an alarming and significant increase in cancers.” In this 2024 presentation for the Stone Summit, U.K.-based surgeon Dr. James Royle describes seeing the same kinds of phenomena regarding turbo cancers as described by Professor Angus Dalgleish, Dr. Ryan Cole, Dr. Ute Krüger, et al. He also notes that the excuses for these cancers that have been used to deflect away from the COVID injections as the cause don’t make any logical sense. “In addition to the increase in all-cause excess deaths in highly vaccinated countries since the gene-based injectable rollout, there has been observed an alarming and significant increase in cancers,” Royle says. “These cancers have been termed colloquially ‘turbo cancers.’ Obviously, this is not a scientific term, but reflects the different aggressive biological nature that seems to be being observed by the public as well as clinicians…There was [also] a clear, dramatic increase [in cancer rates] that occurred in 2021 shortly after the rollout.” Royle goes on to note the following: “A robust study recently published from Japan now [retracted] by the journal after significant pressure showed cancer-related excess mortality in vaccinated populations. Cancer is being observed within all ages. It is my assertion shared by many experts oncologists and clinical colleagues around the world that the cancers we are seeing are extremely aggressive and are of a different biology. One study showed this dramatic increase, particularly in younger ages through 2021, [and in] 2022, [a] 7.9% increase.” The surgeon adds: “I've noticed aggressive widespread recurrences in previously successfully treated bowel cancer cases that I'd considered cured. Many metastases in these cases are unusual or atypical. Middle aged and elderly people are presenting with out-of-the-blue aggressive stage IV colorectal cancer who are incurable and die within weeks or months. In many of these cases, the entire liver appears to be filled with large, round tumor masses.” The prominent surgeon notes that “many of [his] multidisciplinary team colleagues, fellow surgeons, oncologists, pathologists, radiologists and specialist nurses have all acknowledged… [a] sudden change in patterns and [a] dramatic increase in these aggressive incurable advanced cancers…observed in these past two years. However, none of them can offer an explanation.” “This post-2021 increase cannot be explained by a sudden population-wide change in environmental toxins,” Royle notes. “Ultra-processed foods are not new. We already had an obesity epidemic prior to COVID-19,” the surgeon adds. “In any case, there is no valid argument that the increase is due to stopping [cancer] screening given we are seeing a particular increase in cancers in much younger people, 20 to 45 years of age. Screening services for colorectal cancer and breast and others typically start at 60 years [of age].”

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(15/57) DR. WILLIAM MAKIS— “Once the vaccines roll out in 2021, you see a statistically significant rise in cancer, and it rises every single year since then…there’s some kind of damage that…can manifest years after you’ve had your last COVID vaccines.” In this clip from a discussion with pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas, oncologist, radiologist, and cancer researcher Dr. William Makis describes some of the work that’s been done by The Ethical Skeptic on cancer trends following the rollout of the COVID injections. Makis notes that there was a “statistically significant rise in cancer” in the U.S. following the rollout of the COVID injections. Furthermore, he says that the injections cause “some kind of damage that…can manifest years after you’ve had your last COVID vaccines.” "I love the work of Ethical Skeptic, and this is his work," Makis says of the graph he presents for Thomas. "This is a data analyst on X...and he looks at CDC data, and he finds these trends that are really fascinating." "These are deaths from malignant neoplasms in...a younger cohort, ages 0 to 54," Makis says. "And you see that really, in 2020, you don't see much in terms of a [rise in] cancer. There seems to be a slight blip above trend line, but it's sort of still hovering around a long-term trend line. And then once the vaccines roll out in 2021, then you see a statistically significant rise in cancer, and it rises every single year since then." Ethical Skeptic "calls it a 12-sigma event, which is...I'm not even gonna try to describe what that means, how astronomically unlikely this is to be a sort of a random thing or a coincidence," Makis says. "This is a very real trend. I'm seeing it in thousands and thousands of young people," the cancer researcher adds. "And what's shocking and what's particularly concerning about this graph—and I really want people to pay attention to this—is that people stopped taking booster shots. People have, by and large, stopped taking booster shots. But the trend continues. And it's a very steady upward trend. There's no sign of it leveling off or stopping, or reversing. And this has me really, really concerned for the long term." Makis goes on to say: "Initially, I started seeing these patterns...Someone would take a COVID vaccine and then they would be diagnosed with a stage 4 cancer out of the blue four months later, six months later. And I thought, 'Okay. Well, maybe there's a pattern here. Maybe there's a sort of a certain time that's required for cancer to develop.' And through my research, I found, for example, that there is a shift in the type of antibodies that we produce. It's called the IgG4 shift. And IgG4 antibodies start being produced once you've been exposed to multiple shots, once you've had at least two COVID vaccines. And these are called tolerance antibodies. This is where your...immune system starts tolerating the antigen, which is the spike protein; but it also starts tolerating cancer and cancer cells. And that takes a few months. That whole shift takes several months to happen. "But then I start[ed] seeing cases where the young person hasn't taken a shot in the last two years, then they're just suddenly diagnosed with an aggressive stage 4 cancer that behaves the way these mRNA vaccine–induced turbo cancers are behaving, and they [the patients] have a very, very poor prognosis. They don't respond to chemotherapy or radiation therapy or even immunotherapy, and then they die approximately six to 12 months after diagnosis. So there is a long-term effect, and that is the one thing that really has me concerned...that there is something that happens to people who've had the vaccines that is permanent. There's some kind of damage that appears to be permanent, and it can manifest years after you've had your last COVID vaccines. And this is really, really, concerning for me."

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(16/57) DR. CHARLES HOFFE—“In my practice now…approximately two-thirds of all cancer diagnoses—since the vax rollout—are stage 4.” Topping off the first section of this turbo cancer mega-thread, which features expert testimonials from around the Western world, we have a clip of family physician Dr. Charles Hoffe speaking on turbo cancers during a 2022 Children’s Health Defense virtual roundtable. Hoffe, who has more than 30 years of experience as a family physician, notes that “as a family doctor, over the years, a small percentage of the new cancer diagnoses would unfortunately be stage 4 at first diagnosis. But in [his] practice now…approximately two-thirds of all cancer diagnoses since the vax rollout are stage 4.” Hoffe notes, “pathologists around the world have noticed this—that, unfortunately, now people who had previous cancers, which were in remission, are flaring up since their shots because of the damage to their immune system by the COVID shots. [And with] new cancers being diagnosed, the tumors are bigger than ever. They seem to grow very aggressively, spread very aggressively, and be very resistant to treatment. So this has been nicknamed turbo cancer.” The veteran family physician goes on to describe one such case of turbo cancer he’s seen in a man who was mandated to get a COVID injection in order to keep his job. Hoffe shows how the man, a 61-year-old machine operator, developed a grapefruit-sized tumor in his lungs within months of getting his COVID injection. He also developed other tumors, including ones that grew along the vertebrae of his spine. Hoffe notes that the prognosis at the time was that the man would almost certainly die due to the aggressive cancers.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(17/57) DR. MICHAEL HUANG—“The clinic I work at, it's about 30 physicians…in the past year, I've learned that two out of the 30 physicians I work with were diagnosed with aggressive advanced cancer, and one of them died because of that.” Starting off our testimonies portion of this turbo-cancer mega-thread, we have Dr. Michael Huang, a family medicine physician in California, describing during a 2024 conversation with Charles Kovess, et al. how he started to see aggressive cancers crop up in his colleagues following the rollout of the COVID injections. Huang tells Kovess, et al.: “I have seen what has happened when my friends have taken the shots. I used to work at Kaiser. It's a large management group. And the clinic I work at, it's about 30 physicians. And, you know, physicians, we are usually trying to stay healthy, trying to avoid harms. We don't smoke. We don't drink. And, unfortunately, in the past year, I've learned that two out of the 30 physicians I work with were diagnosed with aggressive advanced cancer, and one of them died because of that. Almost monthly, I will hear about one or two physicians [who] die suddenly. And most recently, we know this family practice resident who's in his thirties. We have seen him about a month ago, healthy, vibrant, and he suddenly died of advanced gastric cancer and left an unborn child as a result. So we start to see the results of healthcare providers playing Russian Roulette, getting the shots as they're…leading their patients, setting examples, getting their booster shots and getting injured from these experimental vaccines.”

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(18/57) NURSE DAWN—“This is a huge tumor about the size of a softball behind my eye. And I had [metastases] to the back of my skull and 12 different areas of my bones.” In this clip taken from a 2023 interview with Children’s Health Defense, Dawn, a nurse, describes how she developed cancers throughout her body after receiving two Moderna COVID injections. Dawn describes how the cancer is “muscle-loving,” appearing throughout her body, and did not respond to treatment. Dawn also shows how she developed a “huge tumor about the size of a softball” behind her eye” and had “[metastases] to the back of [her] skull and 12 different areas of [her] bones.”

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(19/57) MODERNA COVID INJECTION–TRIAL PARTICIPANT—“I know I got this vaccine that's caused me to have a rare cancer that has progressed way faster than it was supposed to.” In this clip from a HighWire segment, we hear from a participant of Moderna’s COVID-injection “clinical trial” describe how she developed T-cell lymphoma—a type of cancer that originates from T cells, a type of white blood cell in the immune system—following receipt of her injection. Since being diagnosed, the trial participant notes that she’s been to the doctor approximately 200 times and has had four surgeries. Despite the doctors’ visits and surgeries, however, the participant notes her cancer has only become “worse.”

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(20/57) JILL KLEISS— “Shortly after I had my vaccine, two weeks later, I went to have my routine mammogram…[months later] I insisted on a biopsy…[and was told I] have the same breast cancer again [that I had prior to the ‘vaccine’] on the other side.” In this clip we hear from Jill Kleiss, also known as the Chemo Dancer on YouTube, who describes how she developed breast cancer following her COVID injection. Kleiss, who had had breast cancer prior to receiving the injection, developed cancer in the breast that had previously been healthy and cancer-free.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(21/57) CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE BUS STORY—“[After receiving his COVID injection], all of the sudden he had multiple cancers, fluid buildup around the heart, [and] pneumonia.” In this clip from a Children’s Health Defense bus story, we hear from a gentleman who describes a cousin of his who developed brain and lung cancer following receipt of his COVID injection. The gentleman notes that his cousin subsequently died—the time between the development of the cancers and death was less than a year.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(22/57) CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE BUS STORY—”I…have three aunts that had turbo cancer from the COVID shot. They all died last year. Within months of each other.” A woman describes for Children’s Health Defense how three of her aunts all developed turbo cancer following their receipt of one or more COVID injections. She notes they all died within months of each other.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(23/57) JEREMIAH’S AUNT, NANCY ARCHER—“I think [it] took, from her last shot, approximately, 12 months to get to that point where medicine didn’t even think they had an answer [for her cancer].” In this Children’s Health Defense bus interview, we hear from Jeremiah, who describes how his aunt, Nancy Archer, died of turbo cancer following receipt of a Pfizer COVID injection. “It was heartbreaking to watch her succumb to turbo cancer from the effects of the shot,” Jeremiah says. He notes that she only took the injection because she wanted to ensure that she could travel freely between her homes in the U.S. and Guatemala. The timespan between Nancy’s receipt of her final Pfizer injection and her turbo cancer–caused death was approximately one year according to Jeremiah.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(24/57) 2024 Study Published in Cureus Shows Significant Cancer Increase in Japan Following the Rollout of the COVID Injections in the Country Title: Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan Authors: Miki Gibo, et al. Published: April 8, 2024 Journal: Cureus Key excerpts: “No significant excess mortality was observed during the first year of the pandemic (2020). However, some excess cancer mortalities were observed in 2021 after mass vaccination with the first and second vaccine doses, and significant excess mortalities were observed for all cancers and some specific types of cancer (including ovarian cancer, leukemia, prostate cancer, lip/oral/pharyngeal cancer, pancreatic cancer, and breast cancer) after mass vaccination with the third dose in 2022.” “In 2020, the first year of the pandemic, there was significant deficit mortality for all causes (< 99% lower PI) and no excess mortality for all cancers. However, in 2021, there was significant excess mortality of 2.1% (>99% upper PI) for all causes and 1.1% (>95% upper PI) for all cancers. In 2022, the excesses increased to 9.6% (>99% upper PI) for all causes and 2.1% (>99% upper PI) for all cancers. In 2022, the number of excess deaths was 115,799 (95%CI: 106,018, 125,501) for all causes and 7,162 (95%CI: 4,786, 9,522) for all cancers.” Link: https://www.proquest.com/openview/4513714a8a02ac4e05aed1faa662214c/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2045583

Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan - ProQuest Explore millions of resources from scholarly journals, books, newspapers, videos and more, on the ProQuest Platform. proquest.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(25/57) “Five case reports of 71, 40, 76, 55, and 75 years old with diagnoses of colon cancer, breast cancer, skin cancer, and gastric cancer in the last two patients respectively days and months after receiving the second, third and fourth doses of the COVID-19 vaccine.” Title: Which Could Be the Risk Factors for Developing Cancer After Receiving The COVID-19 Vaccine? Authors: Huang, W. L Published: January 28, 2023 Journal: International Journal of Cancer Research & Therapy Key Excerpts: “There are several articles in the literature after the COVID-19 pandemic showing the necessity of vaccinating people who have a cancer diagnosis to prevent this disease in this group of patients. But what I want to report in this article is that I am facing an increasing number of cases of patients with cancer after receiving COVID-19 vaccines and this is what I want to describe in this study, using the thoughts of Hippocrates (460 bce - 375 bce), the father of medicine, that said that ‘it is more important to consider other ancient medical traditions prior to the knowledge we have nowadays.’” “Five case reports of 71, 40, 76, 55, and 75 years old with diagnoses of colon cancer, breast cancer, skin cancer, and gastric cancer in the last two patients respectively days and months after receiving the second, third and fourth doses of the COVID-19 vaccine.” “The conclusion of this study is that patients that are developing cancer after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine have in common, energy deficiency inside the five internal massive organs (and these alterations are the factors to induce cancer formation according to traditional Chinese medicine) and the use of this kind of vaccine has the potential to reduce even more the vital energy of the patient which is already very low and leading to a weakness state of the immune system and increasing the chance to have any kind of chronic diseases, in this case, cancer.” Link: https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/which-could-be-the-risk-factors-for-developing-cancer-after-receiving-the-covid19-vaccine.pdf

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(26/57) “We report on an aggressive, infiltrating, metastatic, and ultimately lethal basaloid type of carcinoma arising shortly after an mRNA vaccination for COVID-19…We propose that the vaccine can cause suppression of the immune system, which leads to accelerated cancer progression.” Title: Bell’s palsy or an aggressive infiltrating basaloid carcinoma post-mRNA vaccination for COVID-19? A case report and review of the literature Authors: Anthony M Kyriakopoulos, et al. Published: September 15, 2023 Journal: Journal of Experimental and Clinical Sciences Key Excerpts: “We report on an aggressive, infiltrating, metastatic, and ultimately lethal basaloid type of carcinoma arising shortly after an mRNA vaccination for COVID-19…We propose that the vaccine can cause suppression of the immune system, which leads to accelerated cancer progression.” “In this study we describe all aspects of this case and discuss possible causal links between the rapid emergence of this metastatic cancer and mRNA vaccination. We place this within the context of multiple immune impairments potentially related to the mRNA injections that would be expected to potentiate more aggressive presentation and progression of cancer. The type of malignancy we describe suggests a population risk for occurrence of a large variety of relatively common basaloid phenotype cancer cells, which may have the potential for metastatic disease.” Link: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10620857/

Bell’s palsy or an aggressive infiltrating basaloid carcinoma post-mRNA vaccination for COVID-19? A case report and review of the literature We report on an aggressive, infiltrating, metastatic, and ultimately lethal basaloid type of carcinoma arising shortly after an mRNA vaccination for COVID-19. The wife of the patient, since deceased, gave the consent for publishing the case. The ... pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(27/57) “Evidence is provided that adding 100 % of N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ) to the mRNA vaccine in a melanoma model stimulated cancer growth and metastasis…Based on this compelling evidence, we suggest that future clinical trials for cancers or infectious diseases should not use mRNA vaccines with a 100 % m1Ψ modification, but rather ones with the lower percentage of m1Ψ modification to avoid immune suppression.” Title: Review: N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ): Friend or foe of cancer? Authors: Alberto Rubio-Casillas, et al. Published: May 2024 Journal: International Journal of Biological Macromolecules Key Excerpts: “Evidence is provided that adding 100 % of N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ) to the mRNA vaccine in a melanoma model stimulated cancer growth and metastasis…Based on this compelling evidence, we suggest that future clinical trials for cancers or infectious diseases should not use mRNA vaccines with a 100 % m1Ψ modification, but rather ones with the lower percentage of m1Ψ modification to avoid immune suppression.” Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0141813024022323

Review: N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ): Friend or foe of cancer? Due to the health emergency created by SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes the COVID-19 disease, the rapid implementation of a new vaccine technology wa… sciencedirect.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(28/57) “Treg responses produced after mRNA vaccination and the subsequent mRNA-encoded SARS-CoV-2 spike protein expression may lead to a harmful influence on the immune system of vaccinees, and subsequent accelerated development of cancer and autoimmune disease.” Title: Oncogenesis and autoimmunity as a result of mRNA COVID-19 vaccination Authors: Anthony M Kyriakopoulos, et al. Published: April 23, 2024 Journal: TechRxiv PREPRINT Key Excerpts: “In summary, the Treg responses produced after mRNA vaccination and the subsequent mRNA-encoded SARS-CoV-2 spike protein expression may lead to a harmful influence on the immune system of vaccinees, and subsequent accelerated development of cancer and autoimmune disease. These mechanisms are consistent with both epidemiological findings and case reports.” Link: https://www.techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.22541/au.171387387.73158754

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(29/57) “In this report, a rare case of primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma (PCACC) localized in the subcutaneous tissue of the scapular region that grew after BNT162b2 corona virus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination…The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine has been associated with a multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-V). A comparable immune reaction could potentially enhance tumor growth rate.” Title: Primary Cutaneous Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma in a Rare Location With an Immune Response to a BNT162b2 Vaccine Authors: Yilmaz, Abdurrahman, et al. Published: April–June 2024 Journal: JBJS Case Connector Key Excerpts: “In this report, a rare case of primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma (PCACC) localized in the subcutaneous tissue of the scapular region that grew after BNT162b2 corona virus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination is presented and may be explained by CD4 and CD8 cell infiltration. The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine has been associated with a multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-V). A comparable immune reaction could potentially enhance tumor growth rate.” Link: https://journals.lww.com/jbjscc/abstract/2024/06000/primary_cutaneous_adenoid_cystic_carcinoma_in_a.7.aspx

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(30/57) “mRNA vaccine boosters may impair immune system response in immune compromised individuals. Multiple doses of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines may result in much higher levels of IgG 4 antibodies, or also impaired activation of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells.” Title: mRNA vaccine boosters and impaired immune system response in immune compromised individuals: a narrative review Authors: Alberto Boretti Published: January 27, 2024 Journal: Clinical and Experimental Medicine Key Excerpts: “mRNA vaccine boosters may impair immune system response in immune compromised individuals. Multiple doses of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines may result in much higher levels of IgG 4 antibodies, or also impaired activation of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells.” Link: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10238-023-01264-1

mRNA vaccine boosters and impaired immune system response in immune compromised individuals: a narrative review - Clinical and Experimental Medicine Over the last 24 months, there has been growing evidence of a correlation between mRNA COVID-19 vaccine boosters and increased prevalence of COVID link.springer.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(31/57) “The mRNA vaccines potentially cause increased risk to infectious diseases and cancer.” Title: Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs Authors: Stephanie Seneff, et al. Published: June 2022 Journal: Food and Chemical Toxicology Key Excerpts: “The mRNA vaccines potentially cause increased risk to infectious diseases and cancer.” “In this paper, we present evidence that vaccination induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health. Immune cells that have taken up the vaccine nanoparticles release into circulation large numbers of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites. We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance.” “These vaccinations have now been shown to downregulate critical pathways related to cancer surveillance, infection control, and cellular homeostasis.” Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027869152200206X

ScienceDirectScienceDirect sciencedirect.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(32/57) “In this report we describe the case of a healthy, young, athletic woman who developed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL)/lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) after receiving the second dose of the Pfizer/BioNTech modified mRNA (modRNA) COVID-19 genetic vaccine (marketed as Comirnaty)” Title: A Case Report of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL)/Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (LBL) Following the Second Dose of Comirnaty: An Analysis of the Potential Pathogenic Mechanism Based on of the Existing Literature Authors: Patrizia Gentilini, et al. Published: Posted April 1, 2024 Journal: PREPRINT Key Excerpts: “In this report we describe the case of a healthy, young, athletic woman who developed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL)/lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) after receiving the second dose of the Pfizer/BioNTech modified mRNA (modRNA) COVID-19 genetic vaccine (marketed as Comirnaty)” “A time interval of 16 weeks from the second vaccination to the diagnosis of cancer was noted.” Link: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Panagis-Polykretis/publication/379538444_A_Case_Report_of_Acute_Lymphoblastic_Leukaemia_ALLLymphoblastic_Lymphoma_LBL_Following_the_Second_Dose_of_ComirnatyR_An_Analysis_of_the_Potential_Pathogenic_Mechanism_Based_on_of_the_Existing_Literatu/links/6615050439e7641c0ba6c7f8/A-Case-Report-of-Acute-Lymphoblastic-Leukaemia-ALL-Lymphoblastic-Lymphoma-LBL-Following-the-Second-Dose-of-ComirnatyR-An-Analysis-of-the-Potential-Pathogenic-Mechanism-Based-on-of-the-Existing-Literat.pdf

ResearchGate - Temporarily Unavailable researchgate.net

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(33/57) “We report a case of neuropsychiatric symptoms and refractory HLH in a woman with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) after receiving her COVID-19 vaccine treated with belimumab, later found to have intravascular large B-cell lymphoma (IVLBCL) at autopsy.” Title: Fatal hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis with intravascular large B-cell lymphoma following coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus: an intertwined case Authors: Yusuke Ueda, et al. Published: November 6, 2023 Journal: Immunological Medicine Key Excerpts: “We report a case of neuropsychiatric symptoms and refractory HLH in a woman with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) after receiving her COVID-19 vaccine treated with belimumab, later found to have intravascular large B-cell lymphoma (IVLBCL) at autopsy.” Link: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/25785826.2024.2338594

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(34/57) “After reviewing the available literature, we are particularly concerned that certain COVID-19 vaccines may generate a pro-tumorigenic milieu (i.e., a specific environment that could lead to neoplastic transformation) that predisposes some (stable) oncologic patients and survivors to cancer progression, recurrence, and/or metastasis.” Title: SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and the Multi-Hit Hypothesis of Oncogenesis Authors: Raquel Valdes Angues, et al. Published: December 17, 2023 Journal: Cureus Key Excerpts: “After reviewing the available literature, we are particularly concerned that certain COVID-19 vaccines may generate a pro-tumorigenic milieu (i.e., a specific environment that could lead to neoplastic transformation) that predisposes some (stable) oncologic patients and survivors to cancer progression, recurrence, and/or metastasis.” Link: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10792266/

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and the Multi-Hit Hypothesis of Oncogenesis Cancer is a complex and dynamic disease. The “hallmarks of cancer” were proposed by Hanahan and Weinberg (2000) as a group of biological competencies that human cells attain as they progress from normalcy to neoplastic transformation. These ... pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(35/57) “We present a rare case of metastatic prostate cancer diagnosed after initially presenting as generalized lymphadenopathy following a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID) booster vaccination.” Title: Metastatic prostatic adenocarcinoma presenting as generalized lymphadenopathy unmasked by a COVID booster vaccine Authors: Kavya Bharathidasan, et al. Published: November 28, 2023 Journal: Clinical Case Reports Key Excerpts: “We present a rare case of metastatic prostate cancer diagnosed after initially presenting as generalized lymphadenopathy following a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID) booster vaccination.” Link: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ccr3.8278

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(36/57) “Our results raise grave concerns regarding the safety of the BNT162b2 vaccine and call for an immediate halt of all RNA biologicals unless these concerns can be dispelled.” Title: BioNTech RNA-Based COVID-19 Injections Contain Large Amounts Of Residual DNA Including An SV40 Promoter/Enhancer Sequence Authors: Ulrike Kämmerer, et al. Published: December 3, 2024 Journal: Science, Public Health Policy and the Law Key Excerpts: “We further analyzed RNA and DNA contents of these vials and identified large amounts of DNA after RNase A digestion in all lots with concentrations ranging from 32.7 ng to 43.4 ng per clinical dose. This far exceeds the maximal acceptable concentration of 10 ng per clinical dose that has been set by international regulatory authorities.” “Our results raise grave concerns regarding the safety of the BNT162b2 vaccine and call for an immediate halt of all RNA biologicals unless these concerns can be dispelled.” Link: https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/biontech-rna-based-covid-19-injections-contain-large-amounts-of-residual-dna-including-an-sv40-promoter-enhancer-sequence/

BioNTech RNA-Based COVID-19 Injections Contain Large Amounts Of Residual DNA Including An SV40 Promoter/Enhancer Sequence - Science, Public Health Policy and the Law Background: BNT162b2 RNA-based COVID-19 injections are specified to transfect human cells to efficiently produce spike proteins for an immune response. publichealthpolicyjournal.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(37/57) “These data demonstrate the presence of billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in these vaccines. Using fluorometry, all vaccines exceed the guidelines for residual DNA set by FDA and WHO of 10 ng/dose by 188 – 509-fold.” Title: DNA fragments detected in monovalent and bivalent 2 Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada: Exploratory dose response relationship with serious adverse events Authors: David J. Speicher, et al. Journal: PREPRINT Key Excerpts: “These data demonstrate the presence of billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in these vaccines. Using fluorometry, all vaccines exceed the guidelines for residual DNA set by FDA and WHO of 10 ng/dose by 188 – 509-fold…Our findings extend existing concerns about vaccine safety and call into question the relevance of guidelines conceived before the introduction of efficient transfection using LNPs.” Link: https://osf.io/preprints/osf/mjc97

DNA fragments detected in monovalent and bivalent Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada: Exploratory dose response relationship with serious adverse events. Background: In vitro transcription (IVT) reactions used to generate nucleoside modified RNA (modRNA) for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines currently rely on an RNA polymerase transcribing from a DNA template. Production of modRNA used in the original Pfizer randomized clinical trial (RCT) utilized a PCR-generated DNA template (Process 1). To generate billions of vaccine doses, this DNA was cloned into a bacterial plasmid vector for amplification in Escherichia coli before linearization (Process 2), expanding the size and complexity of potential residual DNA and introducing sequences not present in the Process 1 template. It appears that Moderna used a similar plasmid-based process for both clinical trial and post-trial use vaccines. Recently, DNA sequencing studies have revealed this plasmid DNA at significant levels in both Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna modRNA vaccines. These studies surveyed a limited number of lots and questions remain regarding the variance in residual DNA observed internationally. Methods: Using previously published primer and probe sequences, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and Qubit® fluorometry was performed on an additional 27 mRNA vials obtained in Canada and drawn from 12 unique lots (5 lots of Moderna child/adult monovalent, 1 lot of Moderna adult bivalent BA.4/5, 1 lot of Moderna child/adult bivalent BA.1, 1 lot of Moderna XBB.1.5 monovalent, 3 lots of Pfizer adult monovalent, and 1 lot of Pfizer adult bivalent BA.4/5). The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database was queried for the number and categorization of adverse events (AEs) reported for each of the lots tested. The content of one previously studied vial of Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was examined by Oxford Nanopore sequencing to determine the size distribution of DNA fragments. This sample was also used to determine if the residual DNA is packaged in the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) and thus resistant to DNaseI or if the DNA resides outside of the LNP and is DNaseI labile.  Results: Quantification cycle (Cq) values (1:10 dilution) for the plasmid origin of replication (ori) and spike sequences ranged from 18.44 - 24.87 and 18.03 - 23.83 and for Pfizer, and 22.52 – 24.53 and 25.24 – 30.10 for Moderna, respectively. These values correspond to 0.28 – 4.27 ng/dose and 0.22 - 2.43 ng/dose (Pfizer), and 0.01 -0.34 ng/dose and 0.25 – 0.78 ng/dose (Moderna), for ori and spike respectively measured by qPCR, and 1,896 – 3,720 ng/dose and 3,270 – 5,100 ng/dose measured by Qubit® fluorometry for Pfizer and Moderna, respectfully. The SV40 promoter-enhancer-ori was only detected in Pfizer vials with Cq scores ranging from 16.64 – 22.59. In an exploratory analysis, we found preliminary evidence of a dose response relationship of the amount of DNA per dose and the frequency of serious adverse events (SAEs). This relationship was different for the Pfizer and Moderna products. Size distribution analysis found mean and maximum DNA fragment lengths of 214 base pairs (bp) and 3.5 kb, respectively. The plasmid DNA is likely inside the LNPs and is protected from nucleases. Conclusion: These data demonstrate the presence of billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in these vaccines. Using fluorometry, all vaccines exceed the guidelines for residual DNA set by FDA and WHO of 10 ng/dose by 188 – 509-fold. However, qPCR residual DNA content in all vaccines were below these guidelines emphasizing the importance of methodological clarity and consistency when interpreting quantitative guidelines. The preliminary evidence of a dose-response effect of residual DNA measured with qPCR and SAEs warrant confirmation and further investigation. Our findings extend existing concerns about vaccine safety and call into question the relevance of guidelines conceived before the introduction of efficient transfection using LNPs. With several obvious limitations, we urge that our work is replicated under forensic conditions and that guidelines be revised to account for highly efficient DNA transfection and cumulative dosing. osf.io

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(38/57) “We conclude that the SV40 origin of replication and early control region are sufficient viral components for the genomic instability at sites of SV40 integration and that SV40 T Ag is not required.” Title: The genomic instability associated with integrated simian virus 40 DNA is dependent on the origin of replication and early control region Authors: D J Hunter, et al. Published: February 1, 1994 Journal: Journal of Virology Key Excerpts: “We conclude that the SV40 origin of replication and early control region are sufficient viral components for the genomic instability at sites of SV40 integration and that SV40 T Ag is not required.” Link: https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jvi.68.2.787-796.1994?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(39/57) “Residual DNA might be a risk to your final product because of oncogenic and/or infectivity potential. There are several potential mechanisms by which residual DNA could be oncogenic, including the integration and expression of encoded oncogenes or insertional mutagenesis following DNA integration.” Title: Guidance for Industry Characterization and Qualification of Cell Substrates and Other Biological Materials Used in the Production of Viral Vaccines for Infectious Disease Indications Authors: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Key Excerpts: “Residual DNA might be a risk to your final product because of oncogenic and/or infectivity potential. There are several potential mechanisms by which residual DNA could be oncogenic, including the integration and expression of encoded oncogenes or insertional mutagenesis following DNA integration.” Link: https://www.fda.gov/media/78428/download

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(40/57) SENIOR RESEARCH SCIENTIST STEPHANIE SENEFF—"Ninety-eight percent [98%] of the mentions of cancer [in VAERS in 2021] were COVID vaccines...This is just very striking to me that cancer is something that these vaccines cause that other vaccines don't cause..." To start the VAERS portion of this turbo-cancer mega thread, we have senior research scientist at MIT Stephanie Seneff describing for Dr. William Makis, Zen Honeycutt, et al. how the COVID injections are heavily associated with various cancers according to numerous reports in VAERS. "Ninety-eight percent [98%] of the mentions of cancer [in VAERS in 2021] were COVID vaccines," Seneff says. "It's hugely more highly represented than the number of COVID vaccines that were received in that year, so it's way out of line with the other [non-COVID] vaccines." "This is just very striking to me that cancer is something that these vaccines cause that other vaccines don't cause," Seneff adds. She notes that for VAERS reports of cancer regarding flu jabs, there are "practically none," which means the ratio of how often the COVID injections cause cancer versus flu jabs is "infinity." As for mechanism of action, Seneff highlights one paper describing PD-L1 overexpression as a result of the COVID injections, which, in turn, can increase one's odds of developing cancer. (PD-L1, Seneff notes, is a "molecule that's produced by both cancer cells and immune cells" that "prevents... immune cells from responding to both the... COVID virus, but also to cancer.") Seneff notes that the paper shows a "dramatic difference" in overexpression of PD-L1 in the control group versus the group recently injected with the COVID jabs, with the latter group showing far more of it.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(41/57) VAERS ID 1220913: “HUSBAND DIED BECAUSE OF TERMINAL PANCREATIC CANCER.” (One dose of Moderna’s COVID injection.) https://t.co/e0iryfdfLg

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(42/57) VAERS ID 2184304: “HE HAD 2 LUMBAR SPINE X-RAYS ON OR ABOUT JULY 16, 2021, WHICH SHOWED LESIONS ON HIS SPINE…FROM THAT POINT ON I WATCHED THE TUMORS APPEAR ON HIS BODY AND HEAD. HE DIED 9/7/2021.” (Two doses of Moderna’s COVID injection.) https://t.co/t0ZBbVpa7k

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(43/57) VAERS ID 2785362: “TURBO CANCER RAPIDLY SPREAD THROUGHOUT HER BODY, EVENTUALLY WINDING UP IN HER SPINE AND BRAIN…TAKING HER LIFE.” (Three doses of Moderna’s COVID injection.) https://t.co/haWd0l5sfX

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(44/57) VAERS ID 1037833: “SHE [WAS] INFORMED THAT 3 DAYS AFTER THE SHOT, SHE HAD [A] CT WITH CONTRAST FOR STAGE 1 LUNG CANCER.” (One Pfizer COVID injection.) https://t.co/33rfHuGu3O

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(45/57) VAERS ID 1248298: “PATIENT PRESENTS TO EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ONE DAY AFTER VACCINATION…FOUND TO HAVE WIDELY METASTATIC...CANCER INVOLVING CHEST, ABDOMEN, AND PELVIS.” (Two Moderna COVID injections.) https://t.co/uOZEvqujz3

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(46/57) VAERS ID 1290185: “PATIENT STATES THAT WITHIN 2 WEEKS OF THE FIRST VACCINE SHE NOTICED BREAST SWELLING, NIPPLE INVERSION AND TENDER AXILA OF THE RIGHT BREAST…[SHE NOW HAS] INVASIVE BREAST CARCINOMA.” https://t.co/zPtBA8zDXq

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(47/57) SYMPTOMS TEXT SEARCH: CARCINOMA; TOTAL NUMBER OF REPORTS: 923 Note that in the context of the COVID injections, searching a single cancer-related term like “carcinoma” turns up more than 900 reports. Also note that VAERS reports are only a small fraction of the true number of adverse-event cases. According to one study performed by Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc. in 2011, it is estimated that VAERS is underreported by a factor of 100 or more. Source: https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(48/57) “I HAVE A FAMILY MEMBER WHO WAS IMMUNO-COMPROMISED, FORCED TO TAKE [THE] VACCINE TO KEEP [THEIR] JOB, [AND] NOW HAS TURBO CANCER & [IS] FIGHTING FOR [THEIR] LIFE.” https://t.co/Q8Qzyg4DFa

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(49/57) “MY EX TOOK IT...HE DIED 9 MONTHS LATER WITH TURBO CANCER.” https://t.co/TVMaGjcENk

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(50/57) “MY WIFE HAD HER BREAST CANCER IN CHECK BUT WAS MANDATED TO TAKE THE COVID SHOT [WHEN] SHE WAS A SCHOOL TEACHER. TURBO CANCER AND GONE IN 5 WEEKS.” https://t.co/EN9DlNUn51

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(51/57) “I LOST MY BELOVED MOTHER TO METASTATIC CANCER (SARCOMA KIDNEYS AND LUNGS) IN AUG [20]23. SHE DECLINED AFTER HER 5TH VACCINE (MODERNA) IN SEPT [20]22.” https://t.co/U2j0M8H6ja

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(52/57) “MY MUM WAS A HEALTHY, INDEPENDENT, OUT-EVERYDAY WOMAN UNTIL SHE GOT THE SHOT. 2 DAYS LATER SHE HAD BLEEDING BEHIND HER EYES, A FEW MONTHS AFTER THAT, DIAGNOSED WITH LUNG AND BRAIN CANCER…3 DAYS AFTER DIAGNOSIS PASSED AWAY.” https://t.co/8DtdEnuuoX

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(53/57) “I’VE LOST 5 OF MY FRIENDS (45-55 ALL VAXXED) ALL HAD WHAT I’D DESCRIBE AS TURBO CANCERS THAT SPREAD TOO QUICKLY FOR TREATMENT IN SOME CASES.” https://t.co/akzGIRHMJI

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(54/57) “MY [MOTHER IN LAW] WAS DIAGNOSED WITH BRAIN CANCER THIS PAST APRIL, THEY DID OPERATE, BUT 8 [WEEKS] LATER, SHE DIED. SHE WAS [VACCINATED] AT LEAST TWICE THAT WE KNOW OF.” https://t.co/tBT856ql5Z

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(55/57) “I HAVE A 47 YEAR OLD FRIEND WHO DIED THIS WEEK. TURBO CANCER. VAX AND BOOSTED. BRAIN TUMORS AND STAGE 4 COLON CANCER IN A MATTER OF MONTHS. DIED A YEAR LATER.” https://t.co/BLWLdls5oy

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(56/57) “MY DAD PASSED AWAY IN MAY FROM TURBO CANCER! HE WAS DIAGNOSED IN SEPTEMBER OF 2023, 8 MONTHS LATER HE DIED. HE WAS EXTREMELY HEALTHY, AND IN EXCELLENT SHAPE. HE TOOK 2 SHOTS WITHOUT MY KNOWLEDGE…” https://t.co/0kJ587txVP

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(57/57) “LOST MY FRIEND IN FEBRUARY TO A TURBO CANCER. SHE WENT FROM NO CANCER TO BONE CANCER AND STOMACH CANCER TO DEAD IN SEVERAL MONTHS. HER FAMILY PRESSURED HER TO TAKE THE SHOTS.” https://t.co/cQ66egypct

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(ADDENDUM TWEET 1) “You know, if you just read the pamphlet that comes with the COVID-19 vaccines, it says COMIRNATY has not been evaluated for…carcinogenicity…[Meaning] It hasn't been tested to see if it causes cancer.” In this clip, EMT and whistleblower Harry Fisher shows us the package insert that comes with the COMIRNATY injection (i.e. Pfizer’s ostensibly FDA approved COVID injection). He notes that the insert says that the injection has not been tested for potential carcinogenicity. Fisher notes that this means that “it hasn’t been tested to see if it causes cancer.” “They're constantly telling us it [the COVID injection] can't cause cancer, and they haven't even studied to see if it can,” Fisher adds. “They write it right there in the pamphlet.”

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(ADDENDUM TWEET 2) PLEASE ADD YOUR OWN PERSONAL TURBO-CANCER STORY TO THIS THREAD. For me: My first cousin once removed died of turbo cancer at the age of 40 and left behind one young son. Also: my uncle was diagnosed with skin cancer following his injection; my former barber was diagnosed with prostate cancer following his injection; my best friend’s father was diagnosed with colon cancer following his injection.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried Today #10 Joe Rogan raises SERIOUS questions about the Big Bang theory. “Something that’s smaller than the head of a pin that becomes the entire universe that we see is pretty f*cking crazy… That is so much crazier than anything that any religion is proposing,” Rogan said. “There’s no working theory where you can convince me that the whole universe gets compressed into something smaller than the head of a pin and then instantaneously becomes everything that you see,” Rogan contested. Yet when it came to the preservation of ancient scripture, Rogan’s skepticism turned to awe. Speaking with 33-year-old Bible scholar @WesleyLHuff, Rogan found it remarkable that the Book of Isaiah has remained virtually unchanged for over a thousand-year period without the benefits of modern technology, widespread literacy, or advanced preservation methods. “That’s a miracle. That’s pretty f*cking crazy. If you just imagine the sheer number of illiterate people, the sheer number of days that have to go by where people are telling the story exactly the same, and that it’s entrusted in the hands of these very few people that are so dedicated to it that they get the exact words right a thousand years later—pretty bananas.” (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#9 - CNN’s Van Jones can’t stop smiling as Scott Jennings completely kills the pro-Harris vibe in the room. JENNINGS: “I think before we canonize St. Kamala here on the high holy day of January 6, let’s remember the Electoral Count Reform Act of 2022 makes it perfectly clear that the vice president has nothing but purely ministerial duties on this day. She didn’t actually certify the results of the election.” ABBY PHILLIP: “Nobody’s trying to canonize her.” @ScottJenningsKY: “Oh, they’re not? She put out a video trying to canonize herself.” VAN JONES: *Big smile*

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#8 - CNN panel gets TRIGGERED when David Urban reminds them that only one person died on January 6. Her name was Ashli Babbitt. SARAH MATTHEWS: “She [Babbitt] wouldn’t have been there that day if Donald Trump didn’t spread conspiracy theories about an election that he knew was not stolen. And he told those people to go to the Capitol… She would not have died if Donald Trump had accepted the results of the election. And you know that.” DAVID URBAN: “She wouldn’t have died if the police officer didn’t wrongfully shoot her.”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#7 - President Trump announces that he will place massive tariffs on Denmark if they don't immediately relinquish all control of Greenland. "We need Greenland for national security purposes." Credit: @BehizyTweets

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#6 - Top FBI Leader in New Orleans Was on Vacation Over New Year’s Despite Known Vulnerabilities on Bourbon Street – And Left DEI Special Agent with Nose Ring in Charge According to the Oversight Project, top FBI brass Lyonel Myrthil was in Italy which is why they left Special Agent Alethea Duncan in charge to brief the public after the terror attack. In a carefully worded statement, the FBI confirmed to the Oversight Project that Lyonel Myrthil was “en route to a family vacation out of the country” when the terrorist attack occurred. FBI Deputy Director Paul Abbate didn’t even know Lyonel Myrthil was out of the country. Abbate deployed a senior counterterrorism official from FBI HQ to New Orleans hours after the terror attack. Read More: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/01/revealed-top-fbi-leader-new-orleans-was-vacation/

REVEALED: Top FBI Leader in New Orleans Was on Vacation Over New Year's Despite Known Vulnerabilities on Bourbon Street - And Left DEI Special Agent with Nose Ring in Charge | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila Amid rising concerns over security vulnerabilities during New Year's celebrations, the FBI's top official in New Orleans chose vacation over vigilance. Discover the implications of this decision. thegatewaypundit.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@BehizyTweets While you’re here, remember to follow (@VigilantFox) and hit the bell 🔔 for more daily news roundups.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@BehizyTweets #5 - Woman’s Breasts Balloon to Unthinkable Size After COVID Jab https://vigilantnews.com/post/19-year-olds-breasts-balloon-from-b-cup-to-triple-g-after-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-researchers-call-it-first-of-its-kind-case/

19-Year-Old’s Breasts Balloon from B Cup to Triple G After Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Ouch! vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@BehizyTweets #4 - Mollie Hemingway Has Hilarious Take on the ‘Gift’ That Liz Cheney and the J6 Committee Gave to Republicans https://vigilantnews.com/post/mollie-hemingway-has-hilarious-take-on-the-gift-that-liz-cheney-and-the-j6-committee-gave-to-republicans/

Mollie Hemingway Has Hilarious Take on the ‘Gift’ That Liz Cheney and the J6 Committee Gave to Republicans Kudos to Ms. Hemingway for finding the upside of a dark situation. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@BehizyTweets #3 - Kamala’s Miserable Face Goes Viral as She Certifies Her Own Landslide Defeat to Trump https://vigilantnews.com/post/kamalas-miserable-face-goes-viral-as-she-certifies-her-own-landslide-defeat-to-trump/

Kamala’s Miserable Face Goes Viral as She Certifies Her Own Landslide Defeat to Trump "Bookmark this. And whenever you feel a little down, just open it up and watch a few times." vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@BehizyTweets #2 - Biden Falls Asleep During Service for New Orleans Terror Victims https://vigilantnews.com/post/biden-falls-asleep-during-service-for-new-orleans-terror-victims/

Biden Falls Asleep During Service for New Orleans Terror Victims Sleepy Joe strikes again. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@BehizyTweets #1 - Zuckerberg Abandons Facebook Fact-Checkers, Promises Less Censorship

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@BehizyTweets BONUS #1 - Millions Suffer Daily From Magnesium Deficiency Without Even Knowing It https://vigilantnews.com/post/80-of-people-are-deficient-in-magnesium-are-you/

Millions Suffer Daily From Magnesium Deficiency Without Even Knowing It 80% of people are deficient in magnesium—are you? vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@BehizyTweets BONUS #2 - COVID Jabs Hit By Another Devastating Study https://vigilantnews.com/post/covid-jabs-hit-by-another-devastating-study/

COVID Jabs Hit By Another Devastating Study "Safe and effective." vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@BehizyTweets BONUS #3 - How to Get Ivermectin, Z-Pak and More https://vigilantnews.com/post/how-to-get-ivermectin-z-pak-and-more/

How to Get Ivermectin, Z-Pak, and More While millions of Americans understand the need to be prepared, far too many are failing to stockpile one of the single most important items. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@BehizyTweets BONUS #4 - Natural Compounds that Target and Disrupt Bird Flu Infection https://vigilantnews.com/post/natural-compounds-that-target-and-disrupt-bird-flu-infection/

Natural Compounds that Target and Disrupt Bird Flu Infection Getting ahead of unsafe and ineffective government countermeasures. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@BehizyTweets BONUS #5 - Jordan Peterson: ‘This is the Worst Scandal I’ve Ever Heard Of' https://vigilantnews.com/post/jordan-peterson-this-is-the-worst-scandal-ive-ever-heard-of-on-uk-child-abuse-cover-up/

Jordan Peterson: ‘This is the Worst Scandal I’ve Ever Heard Of’ on UK Child Abuse Cover-Up The UK's response to Pakistani gang abuse faces criticism for victimizing whistleblowers and ignoring allegations. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@BehizyTweets Thanks for reading! If you enjoyed this post, please do me a quick favor and follow this page (@VigilantFox) for more top 10 lists. In other news, the COVID-19 “vaccines” have been linked to devastating brain injuries. The data is not looking good: https://t.co/PysHDKPsqy

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried Today #10 - The COVID “vaccines” damage the brain and DEVASTATE mental health, as confirmed by a recent wave of eye-opening studies. The shots increase your risk of: 1. Ischemic stroke (+44%) 2. Hemorrhagic stroke (+50%) 3. Transient ischemic attack (+67%) 4. Myelitis (+165%) 5. Myasthenia gravis (+71%) 6. Alzheimer’s (+22.5%) 7. Cognitive impairment (+137.7%) 8. Depression (+68.3%) 9. Anxiety disorders (+43.9%) 10. Sleep disorders (+93.4%) Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher writes, “The most probable mechanism behind this damage is likely toxic Spike protein accumulation and persistence in the skull-meninges-brain axis, as evidenced by Rong et al., Morz and Mikami et al., and over 300 other studies, which can be found in the Spike Protein Pathogenicity Research Library.” “Using mRNA to hijack cells in various organ systems to produce a highly toxic [spike] protein that persists in the body for months to years was one of the worst ideas in human history,” Hulscher says. Follow @NicHulscher and @McCulloughFund for more breaking news and analysis on the COVID-19 injections. (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

BREAKING STUDY: Intramuscular mRNA Injections Distribute to Vital Organs, Resulting in Systemic Spike Protein Production Spike protein expression observed in critical organs, including the liver, spleen, lungs, heart, head, and kidneys. Even at low doses (0.0005 mg/kg), systemic distribution of LNPs and translated mRNA was measurable. These data demonstrate that COVID-19 mRNA injection LNPs systemically circulate and are taken up into vital organ systems resulting in body-wide toxic Spike protein production. Biodistribution studies should have been performed BEFORE mass ‘vaccination’ of the entire world’s population. These invasive gene therapy injections must be pulled from global markets immediately. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-024-02528-1

Nanocarrier imaging at single-cell resolution across entire mouse bodies with deep learning - Nature Biotechnology Efficient and accurate nanocarrier development for targeted drug delivery is hindered by a lack of methods to analyze its cell-level biodistribution across whole organisms. Here we present Single Cell Precision Nanocarrier Identification (SCP-Nano), an integrated experimental and deep learning pipeline to comprehensively quantify the targeting of nanocarriers throughout the whole mouse body at single-cell resolution. SCP-Nano reveals the tissue distribution patterns of lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) after different injection routes at doses as low as 0.0005 mg kg−1—far below the detection limits of conventional whole body imaging techniques. We demonstrate that intramuscularly injected LNPs carrying SARS-CoV-2 spike mRNA reach heart tissue, leading to proteome changes, suggesting immune activation and blood vessel damage. SCP-Nano generalizes to various types of nanocarriers, including liposomes, polyplexes, DNA origami and adeno-associated viruses (AAVs), revealing that an AAV2 variant transduces adipocytes throughout the body. SCP-Nano enables comprehensive three-dimensional mapping of nanocarrier distribution throughout mouse bodies with high sensitivity and should accelerate the development of precise and safe nanocarrier-based therapeutics. An integrated experimental and deep learning pipeline reveals cell-level targeting of nanocarriers in whole bodies. nature.com

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

Covid Vaccines Launch A Fatal Attack On Every Cell...This Is Not An Accident, This Is Intentional Harm. Dr Mike Yeadon, Former Pfizer VP If It Lands In Your Heart, It Causes Myocarditis Or A Heart Attack. If It Lands In Your Brain, It Causes Stroke Or Neurological Harm. If It Lands In Your Ovaries, It Causes Sterilization. If It Lands In Your Eyes, It Causes Blindness. This is not an accident, this is intentional poisoning & harm. S2 Spike Protein Loads The Body With Synthetic Genetic Material & Causes Heart Disease, Neurologic Disease, Blood Clots, Immunologic Problems & Turbo Cancer. Recent findings show mRNA based vaccines, both Pfizer & Moderna, have DNA impurities. At least 4 laboratories have documented this, 2 recent papers by David Speicher & Kevin Mckernan have identified elevated DNA fragments in amounts & in size. They come from circular pieces of DNA used, that have the code for the mRNA. They are in the form of a plasmid in the E. Coli. The fragments that are detected are the SV40 enhancer, promoter & origin of insertion. The simian virus 40 (SV40) is a known oncogenic DNA virus which induces primary brain & bone cancers, malignant mesothelioma & non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Vaccine generated S2 spike protein targets the organs & Dr Peter McCollough, MD Cardiologist, has developed a peer reviewed 'S2 Spike Protein Detoxification Protocol' linked below. 👇Spike Protein Detoxification Protocol👇 https://www.cureus.com/articles/207654-clinical-approach-to-post-acute-sequelae-after-covid-19-infection-and-vaccination#!/ 👇DNA Fragments In Pfizer & Moderna Vaccines👇 https://osf.io/preprints/osf/mjc97_v1 👇S2 Spike Protein Causes Turbo Cancer👇 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32619819/ 👇SV40 Toxin Causes Turbo Cancer👇 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC452549/

Clinical Approach to Post-acute Sequelae After COVID-19 Infection and Vaccination The spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 has been found to exhibit pathogenic characteristics and be a possible cause of post-acute sequelae after SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 vaccination. COVID-19 vaccines utilize a modified, stabilized prefusion spike protein that may share similar toxic effects with its viral counterpart. The aim of this study is to investigate possible mechanisms of harm to biological systems from SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and vaccine-encoded spike protein and to propose possible mitigation strategies. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and ‘grey literature’ to find studies that (1) investigated the effects of the spike protein on biological systems, (2) helped differentiate between viral and vaccine-generated spike proteins, and (3) identified possible spike protein detoxification protocols and compounds that had signals of benefit and acceptable safety profiles. We found abundant evidence that SARS-CoV-2 spike protein may cause damage in the cardiovascular, hematological, neurological, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and immunological systems. Viral and vaccine-encoded spike proteins have been shown to play a direct role in cardiovascular and thrombotic injuries from both SARS-CoV-2 and vaccination. Detection of spike protein for at least 6-15 months after vaccination and infection in those with post-acute sequelae indicates spike protein as a possible primary contributing factor to long COVID. We rationalized that these findings give support to the potential benefit of spike protein detoxification protocols in those with long-term post-infection and/or vaccine-induced complications. We propose a base spike detoxification protocol, composed of oral nattokinase, bromelain, and curcumin. This approach holds immense promise as a base of clinical care, upon which additional therapeutic agents are applied with the goal of aiding in the resolution of post-acute sequelae after SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination. Large-scale, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials are warranted in order to determine the relative risks and benefits of the base spike detoxification protocol. cureus.com

DNA fragments detected in monovalent and bivalent Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada: Exploratory dose response relationship with serious adverse events. Background: In vitro transcription (IVT) reactions used to generate nucleoside modified RNA (modRNA) for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines currently rely on an RNA polymerase transcribing from a DNA template. Production of modRNA used in the original Pfizer randomized clinical trial (RCT) utilized a PCR-generated DNA template (Process 1). To generate billions of vaccine doses, this DNA was cloned into a bacterial plasmid vector for amplification in Escherichia coli before linearization (Process 2), expanding the size and complexity of potential residual DNA and introducing sequences not present in the Process 1 template. It appears that Moderna used a similar plasmid-based process for both clinical trial and post-trial use vaccines. Recently, DNA sequencing studies have revealed this plasmid DNA at significant levels in both Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna modRNA vaccines. These studies surveyed a limited number of lots and questions remain regarding the variance in residual DNA observed internationally. Methods: Using previously published primer and probe sequences, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and Qubit® fluorometry was performed on an additional 27 mRNA vials obtained in Canada and drawn from 12 unique lots (5 lots of Moderna child/adult monovalent, 1 lot of Moderna adult bivalent BA.4/5, 1 lot of Moderna child/adult bivalent BA.1, 1 lot of Moderna XBB.1.5 monovalent, 3 lots of Pfizer adult monovalent, and 1 lot of Pfizer adult bivalent BA.4/5). The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database was queried for the number and categorization of adverse events (AEs) reported for each of the lots tested. The content of one previously studied vial of Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was examined by Oxford Nanopore sequencing to determine the size distribution of DNA fragments. This sample was also used to determine if the residual DNA is packaged in the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) and thus resistant to DNaseI or if the DNA resides outside of the LNP and is DNaseI labile.  Results: Quantification cycle (Cq) values (1:10 dilution) for the plasmid origin of replication (ori) and spike sequences ranged from 18.44 - 24.87 and 18.03 - 23.83 and for Pfizer, and 22.52 – 24.53 and 25.24 – 30.10 for Moderna, respectively. These values correspond to 0.28 – 4.27 ng/dose and 0.22 - 2.43 ng/dose (Pfizer), and 0.01 -0.34 ng/dose and 0.25 – 0.78 ng/dose (Moderna), for ori and spike respectively measured by qPCR, and 1,896 – 3,720 ng/dose and 3,270 – 5,100 ng/dose measured by Qubit® fluorometry for Pfizer and Moderna, respectfully. The SV40 promoter-enhancer-ori was only detected in Pfizer vials with Cq scores ranging from 16.64 – 22.59. In an exploratory analysis, we found preliminary evidence of a dose response relationship of the amount of DNA per dose and the frequency of serious adverse events (SAEs). This relationship was different for the Pfizer and Moderna products. Size distribution analysis found mean and maximum DNA fragment lengths of 214 base pairs (bp) and 3.5 kb, respectively. The plasmid DNA is likely inside the LNPs and is protected from nucleases. Conclusion: These data demonstrate the presence of billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in these vaccines. Using fluorometry, all vaccines exceed the guidelines for residual DNA set by FDA and WHO of 10 ng/dose by 188 – 509-fold. However, qPCR residual DNA content in all vaccines were below these guidelines emphasizing the importance of methodological clarity and consistency when interpreting quantitative guidelines. The preliminary evidence of a dose-response effect of residual DNA measured with qPCR and SAEs warrant confirmation and further investigation. Our findings extend existing concerns about vaccine safety and call into question the relevance of guidelines conceived before the introduction of efficient transfection using LNPs. With several obvious limitations, we urge that our work is replicated under forensic conditions and that guidelines be revised to account for highly efficient DNA transfection and cumulative dosing. osf.io

S2 subunit of SARS-nCoV-2 interacts with tumor suppressor protein p53 and BRCA: an in silico study - PubMed Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is the biggest threat to human being globally. The first case was identified in a patient with flu symptoms along with severe acute respiratory syndrome in Wuhan, China in December 2019 and now it has spread in more than 200 countries. COVID-19 is more letha … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Emergent Human Pathogen Simian Virus 40 and Its Role in Cancer The polyomavirus simian virus 40 (SV40) is a known oncogenic DNA virus which induces primary brain and bone cancers, malignant mesothelioma, and lymphomas in laboratory animals. Persuasive evidence now indicates that SV40 is causing infections in ... pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

'mRNA COVID Vaccines Caused 74% Of Deaths'... Dr Peter McCullough's Chilling Revelation At US Senate Hearing In May. In The Largest Autopsy Series Published To Date. In All The Deaths We Examined After Vaccination, It Was Determined That 73.9% Of Individuals Died FROM The Vaccines. On May 21, the U.S. Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations held a crucial hearing titled "The Corruption of Science & Federal Health Agencies: How Health Officials Downplayed & Hid Myocarditis & Other Adverse Events Associated with the COVID-19 Vaccines." Top medical experts & legal voices testified, including Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Jordan Vaughn, Dr. James Thorp, Dr. Joel Wallskog, Attorney Aaron Siri & Hawaii Governor Josh Green. Dr. McCullough presented findings from a large autopsy series, stating that in 73.9% of examined post-vaccine deaths, mRNA COVID vaccines were THE cause of death—a claim that has sparked intense debate in the medical community. Causality in each case was determined by three independent reviewers with cardiac pathology experience & expertise. The number of days from last COVID-19 vaccination until death was 6.2 & 3 days, respectively. Most of the deaths occurred within a week from the last injection. We established that the deaths were causally linked to COVID-19 vaccination by independent adjudication. The predominant COVID-19 vaccine platforms include messenger RNA (mRNA) Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Novavax & Zifi Vax – mRNA & viral vector vaccines involve the bodily synthesis of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein as the foundation of the immune response. Regardless of the vaccine platform used, circulating SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein is the detrimental agent through which COVID-19 vaccines cause biological harm. Here Is The 'How & Why' Of The Spike Protein Mechanism That Leads To Harm & Death: Spike protein initiates the breakdown & internalization of ACE2 receptors, which disrupts the renin–angiotensin system (RAS) & lead to increased inflammation, vasoconstriction & thrombosis. Further, Spike protein stimulates platelets & inflicts damage to the endothelium, which leads to arterial & venous thrombosis. Immune cells that have absorbed the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) subsequently reintroduce them into the bloodstream with a higher number of exosomes carrying microRNAs & Spike protein, resulting in drastic inflammation. Long term immune surveillance is compromised by mRNA COVID-19 vaccines due to IRF7, IRF9, p53 & BRCA suppression. There is a causal link between COVID-19 mRNA vaccination & myocarditis, neurodegenerative disease, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell's palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, impeded DNA damage response and tumorigenesis. Moreover, a recent study found that repeated COVID-19 vaccination with mRNA-based vaccines leads to the production of abnormally high concentrations of IgG4 antibodies. These antibodies fail to neutralize Spike protein, which has been shown to circulate for at least 28 days, cause immune suppression & promote the development of autoimmune diseases including myocarditis. 👇Fatal COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Myocarditis👇 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ehf2.14680 👇Cardiac Arrest After COVID-19 Vaccination👇 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40061285/ Speaker: Dr Peter McCullough, MD Cardiologist

Risk stratification for future cardiac arrest after COVID-19 vaccination - PubMed Unheralded cardiac arrest among previously healthy young people without antecedent illness, months or years after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination, highlights the urgent need for risk stratification. The most likely underlying pathophysiology is subclinical myopericarditis and reentra … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

"It Was Clear From The Beginning, The Illness Of COVID Was Actually All About The Vaccine...A Needle Into Every Arm." Dr Peter McCullough, MD The Vaccine Did Not Save Millions Of Lives...The Shots Contain A Killer Protein That Cannot Be Turned Off...It Was Not Safe By Design. The predominant COVID-19 vaccine platforms include messenger RNA (mRNA) Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Novavax & Zifi Vax – mRNA & viral vector vaccines involve the bodily synthesis of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein as the foundation of the immune response. Regardless of the vaccine platform used, circulating SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein is the detrimental agent through which COVID-19 vaccines cause biological harm. Here Is The 'How & Why' Of The Spike Protein Mechanism That Leads To Harm & Death: Spike protein initiates the breakdown & internalization of ACE2 receptors, which disrupts the renin–angiotensin system (RAS) & lead to increased inflammation, vasoconstriction & thrombosis. Further, Spike protein stimulates platelets & inflicts damage to the endothelium, which leads to arterial & venous thrombosis. Immune cells that have absorbed the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) subsequently reintroduce them into the bloodstream with a higher number of exosomes carrying microRNAs & Spike protein, resulting in drastic inflammation. Long term immune surveillance is compromised by mRNA COVID-19 vaccines due to IRF7, IRF9, p53 & BRCA suppression. There is a causal link between COVID-19 mRNA vaccination & myocarditis, neurodegenerative disease, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell's palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, impeded DNA damage response and tumorigenesis. Moreover, a recent study found that repeated COVID-19 vaccination with mRNA-based vaccines leads to the production of abnormally high concentrations of IgG4 antibodies. These antibodies fail to neutralize Spike protein, which has been shown to circulate for at least 28 days, cause immune suppression & promote the development of autoimmune diseases including myocarditis. 👇Fatal COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Myocarditis👇 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ehf2.14680 👇Cardiac Arrest After COVID-19 Vaccination👇 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40061285/ 👇DNA Fragments In Pfizer & Moderna Vaccines👇 https://osf.io/preprints/osf/mjc97_v1 Speaker: @P_McCulloughMD @McCulloughFund

Risk stratification for future cardiac arrest after COVID-19 vaccination - PubMed Unheralded cardiac arrest among previously healthy young people without antecedent illness, months or years after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination, highlights the urgent need for risk stratification. The most likely underlying pathophysiology is subclinical myopericarditis and reentra … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

DNA fragments detected in monovalent and bivalent Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada: Exploratory dose response relationship with serious adverse events. Background: In vitro transcription (IVT) reactions used to generate nucleoside modified RNA (modRNA) for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines currently rely on an RNA polymerase transcribing from a DNA template. Production of modRNA used in the original Pfizer randomized clinical trial (RCT) utilized a PCR-generated DNA template (Process 1). To generate billions of vaccine doses, this DNA was cloned into a bacterial plasmid vector for amplification in Escherichia coli before linearization (Process 2), expanding the size and complexity of potential residual DNA and introducing sequences not present in the Process 1 template. It appears that Moderna used a similar plasmid-based process for both clinical trial and post-trial use vaccines. Recently, DNA sequencing studies have revealed this plasmid DNA at significant levels in both Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna modRNA vaccines. These studies surveyed a limited number of lots and questions remain regarding the variance in residual DNA observed internationally. Methods: Using previously published primer and probe sequences, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and Qubit® fluorometry was performed on an additional 27 mRNA vials obtained in Canada and drawn from 12 unique lots (5 lots of Moderna child/adult monovalent, 1 lot of Moderna adult bivalent BA.4/5, 1 lot of Moderna child/adult bivalent BA.1, 1 lot of Moderna XBB.1.5 monovalent, 3 lots of Pfizer adult monovalent, and 1 lot of Pfizer adult bivalent BA.4/5). The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database was queried for the number and categorization of adverse events (AEs) reported for each of the lots tested. The content of one previously studied vial of Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was examined by Oxford Nanopore sequencing to determine the size distribution of DNA fragments. This sample was also used to determine if the residual DNA is packaged in the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) and thus resistant to DNaseI or if the DNA resides outside of the LNP and is DNaseI labile.  Results: Quantification cycle (Cq) values (1:10 dilution) for the plasmid origin of replication (ori) and spike sequences ranged from 18.44 - 24.87 and 18.03 - 23.83 and for Pfizer, and 22.52 – 24.53 and 25.24 – 30.10 for Moderna, respectively. These values correspond to 0.28 – 4.27 ng/dose and 0.22 - 2.43 ng/dose (Pfizer), and 0.01 -0.34 ng/dose and 0.25 – 0.78 ng/dose (Moderna), for ori and spike respectively measured by qPCR, and 1,896 – 3,720 ng/dose and 3,270 – 5,100 ng/dose measured by Qubit® fluorometry for Pfizer and Moderna, respectfully. The SV40 promoter-enhancer-ori was only detected in Pfizer vials with Cq scores ranging from 16.64 – 22.59. In an exploratory analysis, we found preliminary evidence of a dose response relationship of the amount of DNA per dose and the frequency of serious adverse events (SAEs). This relationship was different for the Pfizer and Moderna products. Size distribution analysis found mean and maximum DNA fragment lengths of 214 base pairs (bp) and 3.5 kb, respectively. The plasmid DNA is likely inside the LNPs and is protected from nucleases. Conclusion: These data demonstrate the presence of billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in these vaccines. Using fluorometry, all vaccines exceed the guidelines for residual DNA set by FDA and WHO of 10 ng/dose by 188 – 509-fold. However, qPCR residual DNA content in all vaccines were below these guidelines emphasizing the importance of methodological clarity and consistency when interpreting quantitative guidelines. The preliminary evidence of a dose-response effect of residual DNA measured with qPCR and SAEs warrant confirmation and further investigation. Our findings extend existing concerns about vaccine safety and call into question the relevance of guidelines conceived before the introduction of efficient transfection using LNPs. With several obvious limitations, we urge that our work is replicated under forensic conditions and that guidelines be revised to account for highly efficient DNA transfection and cumulative dosing. osf.io

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

"We Should NEVER Have Someone Die After Taking A Vaccine." Dr Peter McCullough, MD "It Looked Like Somebody Took A Blowtorch To That Heart, It Was So Completely Fried With Inflammation." "1,065 Peer Reviewed Documents Have Proven Covid Vaccines Cause Myocarditis Heart Damage." "It Was Clear From The Beginning, The Illness Of COVID Was Actually All About The Vaccine...A Needle Into Every Arm." The Vaccine Did Not Save Millions Of Lives...The Shots Contain A Killer Protein That Cannot Be Turned Off...It Was Not Safe By Design. The predominant COVID-19 vaccine platforms include messenger RNA (mRNA) Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Novavax & Zifi Vax – mRNA & viral vector vaccines involve the bodily synthesis of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein as the foundation of the immune response. Regardless of the vaccine platform used, circulating SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein is the detrimental agent through which COVID-19 vaccines cause biological harm. Here Is The 'How & Why' Of The Spike Protein Mechanism That Leads To Harm & Death: Spike protein initiates the breakdown & internalization of ACE2 receptors, which disrupts the renin–angiotensin system (RAS) & lead to increased inflammation, vasoconstriction & thrombosis. Further, Spike protein stimulates platelets & inflicts damage to the endothelium, which leads to arterial & venous thrombosis. Immune cells that have absorbed the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) subsequently reintroduce them into the bloodstream with a higher number of exosomes carrying microRNAs & Spike protein, resulting in drastic inflammation. Long term immune surveillance is compromised by mRNA COVID-19 vaccines due to IRF7, IRF9, p53 & BRCA suppression. There is a causal link between COVID-19 mRNA vaccination & myocarditis, neurodegenerative disease, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell's palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, impeded DNA damage response, autoimmune diseases & tumorigenesis. 👇Fatal COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Myocarditis👇 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ehf2.14680 👇Cardiac Arrest After COVID-19 Vaccination👇 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40061285/ 👇COVID Vaccine Induced Myocarditis👇 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35482094/ Speaker: @P_McCulloughMD @McCulloughFund

Risk stratification for future cardiac arrest after COVID-19 vaccination - PubMed Unheralded cardiac arrest among previously healthy young people without antecedent illness, months or years after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination, highlights the urgent need for risk stratification. The most likely underlying pathophysiology is subclinical myopericarditis and reentra … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Follow-up cardiac magnetic resonance in children with vaccine-associated myocarditis - PubMed •Late gadolinium enhancement improved on all repeat cardiac magnetic resonance at 3-month follow-up. •Most patients still had a small amount of late gadolinium enhancement, the clinical significance of which is yet to be determined. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

BREAKING: Another COVID “conspiracy theory” just came true. A Special HHS Adviser confirmed it, and you could see the pain written all over his face. This explains why RFK Jr. effectively shut down all mRNA vaccine funding. 🧵 THREAD

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

HHS Secretary RFK Jr. dropped a mega bombshell on Tuesday when he announced that BARDA will be CANCELING 22 mRNA vaccine development contracts, saving taxpayers about $500 million in the process. He declared, “mRNA technology poses MORE risk than benefits for these respiratory viruses.” Now, we have a clearer picture as to why he made that bold statement.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Thursday, on Steve Bannon’s War Room, HHS Special Adviser Dr. Steven Hatfill revealed that RFK Jr. pulled mRNA funding after the data showed getting vaccinated was MORE dangerous than COVID itself. In other words, the “cure” was WORSE than the disease. Dr. Hatfill said, “It was more dangerous to take a vaccine than it was to contract COVID-19 and be hospitalized with it.”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

He explained that when meta-analyses were conducted, the results would consistently show “NO BENEFIT TO RISK RATIO for taking a messenger RNA vaccine.” Dr. Hatfill added that the shots send a “sudden flood” of mRNA into the body, which overwhelms the cells and creates “BIOLOGICAL HAVOC.” With pain written all over his face, he concluded, “IT HAD TO BE STOPPED.” No one says something that grave unless the data is absolutely damning.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

In another series of explosive statements, Dr. Hatfill attested that the vaccine manufacturers never did their due diligence to ensure their shots were safe and “essentially ran the pandemic response.” “Nobody stood up to them. Nobody questioned them… Pfizer wanted a [75]-year moratorium on the clinical trial data, which from the start showed these never prevented infection or disease transmission,” he explained, adding, “There’s no good clinical data to ever show it reduced the severity of disease.” “The vaccines have injured hundreds of thousands, and we’re not really sure how many have been killed by it, but a significant amount,” Dr. Hatfill lamented. “They [mRNA vaccine technology] had to come off the market. There was no choice. You want to make America healthy again? It had to be stopped.”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Dr. Hatfill’s statements are backed up by damning study after study. In 2022, the same year Dr. Hatfill said the data began piling up, Joseph Fraiman and colleagues published a reanalysis of the Pfizer and Moderna trials, showing that the number of serious post-vaccine adverse events far EXCEEDED the number of hospitalizations prevented. Pfizer trial: • Adverse Events of Special Interest: 10.1 extra cases per 10,000 vaccinated compared to placebo. • Hospitalizations prevented: 2.3 per 10,000. Moderna trial: • Adverse Events of Special Interest: 15.1 extra cases per 10,000 vaccinated over placebo. • Hospitalizations prevented: 6.4 per 10,000 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36055877/reanalysis

Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults - PubMed The excess risk of serious adverse events found in our study points to the need for formal harm-benefit analyses, particularly those that are stratified according to risk of serious COVID-19 outcomes. These analyses will require public release of participant level datasets. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

In fact, Fraiman and colleagues published another study showing that in order to prevent one COVID‑19 hospitalization over a 6‑month period among young adults (18-29), over 30,000 of them would need to receive a third (booster) mRNA dose. For each hospitalization prevented, the analysis estimated that at least 18.5 serious adverse events would occur. https://jme.bmj.com/content/50/2/126

COVID-19 vaccine boosters for young adults: a risk benefit assessment and ethical analysis of mandate policies at universities In 2022, students at North American universities with third-dose COVID-19 vaccine mandates risk disenrolment if unvaccinated. To assess the appropriateness of booster mandates in this age group, we combine empirical risk-benefit assessment and ethical analysis. To prevent one COVID-19 hospitalisation over a 6-month period, we estimate that 31 207–42 836 young adults aged 18–29 years must receive a third mRNA vaccine. Booster mandates in young adults are expected to cause a net harm: per COVID-19 hospitalisation prevented, we anticipate at least 18.5 serious adverse events from mRNA vaccines, including 1.5–4.6 booster-associated myopericarditis cases in males (typically requiring hospitalisation). We also anticipate 1430–4626 cases of grade ≥3 reactogenicity interfering with daily activities (although typically not requiring hospitalisation). University booster mandates are unethical because they: (1) are not based on an updated (Omicron era) stratified risk-benefit assessment for this age group; (2) may result in a net harm to healthy young adults; (3) are not proportionate: expected harms are not outweighed by public health benefits given modest and transient effectiveness of vaccines against transmission; (4) violate the reciprocity principle because serious vaccine-related harms are not reliably compensated due to gaps in vaccine injury schemes; and (5) may result in wider social harms. We consider counterarguments including efforts to increase safety on campus but find these are fraught with limitations and little scientific support. Finally, we discuss the policy relevance of our analysis for primary series COVID-19 vaccine mandates. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. The data are cited in table 1 and in the references. All data and calculations are included in the manuscript. We are providing the following citations as well: 18. Oliver S. Updates to the evidence to recommendation framework: Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccine booster doses. ACIP Meeting. 19 November 2021 (Slides 26, 29, 30, 31, 37). Available at: . Accessed on 28 March 2022; 50. CDC. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE): Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Janssen COVID-19 booster doses. 29 October 2021. Available at: ; 51. Shimabukuro T. Update on myocarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). 23 June 2022. Available at: Update on myocarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (cdc.gov). Slides 10 and 23. Accessed on 20 August 2022; 52. Shimabukuro T. Myocarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). 19 July 2022. Available at: Myocarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (cdc.gov). Slides 11 and 23. Accessed on 20 August 2022; 53. Sharff KA, Dancoes DM, Longueil JL, et al . Myopericarditis after COVID-19 booster dose vaccination. Am J Card 2022;172:165–166. ; 54. Friedensohn L, Levin D, Fadlon-Derai M, et al . Myocarditis following a third BNT162b2 vaccination dose in military recruits in Israel. JAMA Apr 26;327(16):1611–1612. doi:10.1001/jama.2022.4425. jme.bmj.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

But that’s just the tip of the iceberg. I turned to epidemiologist @NicHulscher, who lives and breathes this research. He’s been digging into the data non-stop and basically knows the numbers by heart. I’ll let him break down the receipts that back up Dr. Hatfill’s claims:

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Senior HHS Advisor Dr. Steven Hatfill just said mRNA shots induce “BIOCHEMICAL HAVOC.” He’s likely referring to the new study that found mRNA shots induce severe, long-lasting genetic disruption linked to cancer and chronic disease. Using high-resolution RNA sequencing on blood samples, they discovered that COVID-19 “vaccines” SEVERELY disrupt expression of THOUSANDS of genes—triggering mitochondrial failure, immune reprogramming, and oncogenic activation that can persist for MONTHS to YEARS post-injection. Differential gene expression analysis compared mRNA-injured patients (cancer, adverse events) to 803 healthy controls — revealing widespread transcriptomic CHAOS. https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202507.2155/v1

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Dr. Hatfill said the data had accumulated to the point where large studies could be conducted. He’s right. The two LARGEST COVID-19 “vaccine” safety studies in HISTORY—covering 184 MILLION people—prove mRNA shots are NOT SAFE for human use. 📍 Faksova et al. (n=99M) (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38350768/) ➊ Myocarditis +510% (dose 2) ➋ Brain/Spinal Cord Inflammation +278% (dose 1) ➌ Brain Clots +223% (dose 1) ➍ Guillain-Barré +149% (dose 1) 📍 Karimi et al. (n=85M) (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11970839/) ➊ Heart Attack +286% (dose 2) ➋ Stroke +240% (dose 1) ➌ Coronary Artery Disease +244% (dose 2) ➍ Cardiac Arrhythmia +199% (dose 1)

COVID-19 vaccines and adverse events of special interest: A multinational Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) cohort study of 99 million vaccinated individuals - PubMed This multi-country analysis confirmed pre-established safety signals for myocarditis, pericarditis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Other potential safety signals that require further investigation were identified. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

COVID-19 Vaccination and Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Multivariate Meta-Analysis of Preventive Benefits and Risks To provide a detailed understanding and apply a comprehensive strategy, this study examines the association between COVID-19 vaccination and cardiovascular events. We conducted a Bayesian multivariate meta-analysis using summary data across multiple ... pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Dr. Hatfill said, “It was more dangerous to take a vaccine than it was to contract COVID-19 and be hospitalized with it.” Nearly 1,000 peer-reviewed references across 3 landmark studies (1, 2, 3) by Mead et al. PROVE the catastrophic risks of the COVID-19 “vaccines” FAR outweigh their imaginary, theoretical benefits: 🔻 The shots didn’t save lives — they caused catastrophic harm Autopsy evidence, reanalyzed trial data & real-world outcomes show no mortality benefit. Early treatment saved lives — not rushed genetic injections. 🔻 The risks far outweigh any theoretical benefits Central conclusion of all 3 papers: catastrophic harm across multiple systems makes the current risk-benefit calculus indefensible. 🔻 Massive injury: heart, brain, immune system, fertility, cancer Harms include myocarditis, strokes, immunosuppression, infertility & aggressive tumor progression — driven by spike toxicity, LNP biodistribution & genetic contamination. 🔻 Urgent call for a global moratorium All modRNA products must be withdrawn immediately, given the scale of harm.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

With HHS finally beginning its offensive against deadly mRNA injections, one objective remains: IMMEDIATE MARKET WITHDRAWAL. A MAJOR peer-reviewed study identified FIVE irrefutable grounds for the immediate market withdrawal of COVID-19 “vaccines”: 📢Widespread & Unified Calls for Market Withdrawal – More than 81,000 physicians, scientists, and concerned citizens, 240 elected officials, 17 public health & physician organizations, 2 State Republican Parties, 17 GOP County Committees, and 6 global studies demand immediate removal. ⚰️ Excess Mortality – More than 12 studies and VAERS confirm mass COVID-19 'vaccination' led to a catastrophic number deaths -- up to 17 million. ⚠️ FDA Class I Recall Indicated – 37,544 VAERS-reported deaths exceed past vaccine recall limits by up to 375,340%. 📉 Negative Efficacy – 7 studies have demonstrated that COVID-19 'vaccination' increases your risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. 🧬 DNA Contamination – 11 reports have found DNA contamination in COVID-19 vaccines, documented across multiple manufacturers, vaccine platforms, and geographic regions, with levels exceeding regulatory thresholds by up to 65,500%. https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/review-of-calls-for-market-removal-of-covid-19-vaccines-intensify-risks-far-outweigh-theoretical-benefits/

Review: Calls for Market Removal of COVID-19 Vaccines Intensify as Risks Far Outweigh Theoretical Benefits - Science, Public Health Policy and the Law COVID-19 vaccination campaigns around the globe have failed to meet fundamental standards of safety and efficacy, leading to mounting evidence of significant publichealthpolicyjournal.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Nic is right. Immediate market withdrawal is needed. It’s completely unethical to have a “vaccine” on the market that is not only ineffective, but MORE dangerous than the disease it is supposed to protect against. Kennedy effectively canceled future mRNA vaccines by pulling the plug on government funding. The next logical step is to yank the shots. It will come with political backlash, but it’s the right thing to do. As Dr. Hatfill said, “They [mRNA vaccine technology] had to come off the market. There was no choice. You want to make America healthy again? It had to be stopped.”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@NicHulscher Thanks for reading! Huge thanks to @NicHulscher for teaming up with me on this piece. No one breaks down the data like he does. If you’re not already following him, you’re missing one of the very best COVID truth accounts out there. —> @NicHulscher

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@NicHulscher Would you like to see more threads like this one, where I break down the videos and @NicHulscher backs it up with the raw data? Maybe we could turn it into a semi-regular thing.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

A little bit about me: I spent over a decade working as a licensed healthcare professional. But when the Biden administration rolled out its vaccine mandates, I couldn’t stay silent. My conscience simply wouldn’t let me. That’s when I started this page. Since then, I’ve shared thousands of clips featuring doctors and scientists who were brave enough to question the official COVID narrative. Along the way, we’ve reached billions of views and helped millions of people understand the other side of the COVID story that the government didn’t want out. If you’re looking for clear, honest information without corporate spin, you’re in the right place. Follow me for straight-to-the-point clips and threads that challenge the narrative. Follow on 𝕏: @VigilantFox

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@NicHulscher I was banned 3 times from Twitter 1.0 for sharing dangerous “COVID misinformation.” Turns out, my reporting was true. Sign up for my newsletter to see what other “conspiracy theories” come true next. GET MY NEWS ALERTS HERE: https://vigilantfox.com/p/how-to-stay-informed-with-vigilant.

How to Stay Informed with The Vigilant Fox WELCOME NEW READERS! vigilantfox.com

@newstart_2024 - Camus

Bret Weinstein breaks down the three foundational vaccine technologies, arguing that none are fundamentally safe. Each carries a severe, inherent downside. 1. Live Attenuated Vaccines: The risk here is unpredictability and evolution. A virus weakened for one person may cause a serious infection in another. Crucially, it can revert to a pathogenic, transmissible form—a "contagious vaccine." The historical case of the oral polio vaccine causing numerous polio cases stands as a stark warning. 2. Inactivated Virus/Fragments (with Adjuvant): The problem is immune misdirection. A dead virus alone is unconvincing, requiring an "adjuvant"—a chemical alarm bell. This non-specific signal causes the immune system to "freak out," not just at the target antigen but at anything present, like pollen or gut bacteria. Indiscriminately triggering a systemic immune response is a dangerous gamble. 3. mRNA Technology: The danger is haphazard biodistribution. The mRNA instructions travel unpredictably, instructing cells anywhere in the body to produce the foreign antigen. The immune system then rightly identifies these cells as infected and attacks them. This random destruction of healthy tissue—for instance, in the heart—is an unacceptable and fundamentally unsafe mechanism. The conclusion is sobering: our current technological paradigms for vaccination are built on foundations with profound and unaddressed safety trade-offs.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING: World’s First International Governing Body and Judicial Authority Declares mRNA Injections Biological and Technological Weapons of Mass Destruction The Alliance of Indigenous Nations International Tribunal — recognized by Canada on a Nation-to-Nation basis — has issued a historic global Order intended to take immediate worldwide effect. “This Tribunal finds and hereby declares that the ‘COVID-19 nanoparticle injections’ or ‘mRNA nanoparticle injections’ or ‘COVID-19 injections‘ meet the criteria of biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction according to the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act, of 1989 18 USC § 175; Weapons and Firearms § 790.166 Fla. Stat.(2023), Canada‘s Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention Implementation Act, 2004, and the International Biological Weapons Convention. This Order and Declaration is intended to have immediate worldwide effect.” Canada’s Ministry of Crown–Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs (CIRNAC) formally acknowledged the Alliance of Indigenous Nations, its Treaty, and its International Tribunal—a judicial body composed of judges from every continent. In its official letter dated December 13, 2024, Canada affirmed that its relationship with the A.I.N. exists on a Nation-to-Nation basis, thereby recognizing the Tribunal as a sovereign legal authority under Indigenous and international law. Whether this unprecedented declaration will trigger tangible legal or governmental action remains to be seen. But it sets a historic precedent: a recognized international tribunal has formally named the COVID-19 mRNA injections as weapons of mass destruction—placing the burden squarely on world governments, public health agencies, and courts of law to respond. Credit to @PhdSansone for breaking this landmark development.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING: Our New Study Shows COVID-19 mRNA Injections Violate the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) — Making Them UNLAWFUL 🚫💉Also violated the Nuremberg Code, Helsinki Declaration, and U.S. Constitutional protections (1st, 10th, 14th Amendments). These shots were engineered with dangerous gain-of-function traits: 🧬 Spike protein encoded with furin cleavage site 🧬 HIV-like & SEB superantigen motifs 🧬 mRNA recoded with synthetic base (m1Ψ) → aberrant proteins By coercing populations into taking unsafe, experimental gene-transfer products without informed consent, these violations were multiplied across society. Accountability is warranted. Shout out to the scientists, physicians, and legal experts who made this study possible: @AndrewZywiecMD @IreneMavrakakis @MarivicVillaMD5 @jathorpmfm @P_McCulloughMD @AaronKheriatyMD @CharlesRixey @AbraxasHudson @DrPaulEMarik

@McCulloughFund - McCullough Foundation

COVID Vaccines ‘Unleashed Profound Harm’ New Peer-Reviewed Paper Says The study, authored by 11 scientific and legal experts, found the man-made features of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are likely the result of controversial gain-of-function research. The

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

This marks the first formal judicial declaration by any recognized international authority categorizing the COVID-19 mRNA products as biological weapons. https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-worlds-first-international

BREAKING: World’s First International Governing Body and Judicial Authority Declares mRNA Injections Biological and Technological Weapons of Mass Destruction The Alliance of Indigenous Nations International Tribunal — recognized by Canada on a Nation-to-Nation basis — has issued a historic global Order intended to take immediate worldwide effect. thefocalpoints.com

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨mRNA Technology Unleashes a Chain Reaction of Biological Destruction — the “Cascade of Harm” 🧬Gene Dysregulation → 🧩Protein Errors → 🩸Biochemical Stress → ⚠️Severe Clinical Outcomes → ☠️ Death This is why mRNA technology will NEVER be safe👇

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨 BREAKING: mRNA Technology Triggers a Chain Reaction of Biological Destruction Two landmark studies map the “Cascade of Harm” 👇 1. 🧬Gene Dysregulation — thousands of genes disrupted, ribosomal dysfunction, mitochondrial collapse 2. 🧩Protein Errors — Aberrant protein production, abnormal fibrinogen, actin & amyloid; seeds for clotting & misfolded aggregates 3. 🩸Biochemical Stress — ↑proBNP (heart strain), ↑carbamide (kidney dysfunction), ↑CRP/ferritin (inflammation) 4. ⚠️Clinical Outcomes — myocarditis, clotting, turbo cancers, immune collapse, kidney failure, death These two new studies connect the dots, mapping the full stepwise progression of damage unleashed by mRNA technology: from transcriptomic dysregulation, to proteomic corruption, to biochemical distress, and finally to devastating clinical outcomes: 📰von Ranke N, Zhang W, Anokin P, Shao D, Bereimipour A, Vu M, Hulscher N, McKernan KJ, McCullough PA, Catanzaro JA. Synthetic mRNA Vaccines and Transcriptomic Dysregulation: Evidence From New-Onset Adverse Events and Cancers Post-Vaccination. Preprints. 2025;2025072155. doi: 10.20944/preprints202507.2155.v1 📰Hudák A; Pettko-Szandtner A; Letoha A; Letoha T. Clinical and Proteomic Associations of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19 Vaccination in Multimorbid Patients: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 8007. doi: 10.3390/ijms26168007

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨 BREAKING STUDY: mRNA Injections Induce Severe, Long-Lasting Genetic Disruption Linked to Cancer and Chronic Disease 🧪 Using high-resolution RNA sequencing on blood samples, we discovered that COVID-19 “vaccines” SEVERELY disrupt expression of THOUSANDS of genes—triggering https://t.co/fLuUHPFRW0

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Our new study indicates that mRNA injections may never leave the human body in some individuals. Governments and corporations made blatantly false claims that mRNA would degrade within days to weeks. Now, in the most comprehensive COVID-19 "vaccine" injury case study to date, mRNA, plasmid DNA, and spike protein were repeatedly detected more than 3.5 years after the final injection — following >40 ER visits, >200 specialist encounters, >100 laboratory investigations, >100 imaging studies, and multi-laboratory molecular confirmation across blood and tissue. Legal accountability is inevitable after billions worldwide were lied to.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING STUDY: Vaccine mRNA, Plasmid DNA, and Spike Protein Can Persist in Humans More Than 3.5 Years After COVID-19 Vaccination We report the longest documented persistence of mRNA vaccine components to date, independently confirmed across multiple laboratories, biospecimens, and time points using diverse analytical methods. For years, the public was told that mRNA vaccine materials would degrade within days to weeks — rapidly broken down, biologically transient, and incapable of long-term persistence. That assumption shaped regulatory assurances, public messaging, and safety expectations worldwide. Billions across the globe received these injections based on the claim that the genetic material would quickly disappear from the body. Today, that narrative collapses — following a coordinated, multi-country investigative effort involving the McCullough Foundation, the INMODIA laboratory (Germany), the Municipal Hospital Dresden-Friedrichstadt (Germany), Neo7Bioscience, and collaborating independent laboratories. The resulting paper, titled “Unprecedented Persistence of Vaccine mRNA, Plasmid DNA, Spike Protein, and Genomic Dysregulation Over 3.5 Years Post–COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination,” presents what is, to our knowledge, the most comprehensive COVID-19 vaccine injury case report to date. A 55-year-old male developed progressive multi-organ dysfunction following three Pfizer mRNA doses, including pulmonary emboli, MRI-confirmed myocarditis, small fiber neuropathy, autonomic dysfunction, neurocognitive impairment, chronic GI involvement, sensorineural hearing loss, dermatologic inflammation, and anxiety/depression. Diagnostic evaluation was extraordinary: 40+ ER visits 200+ specialist encounters (18 disciplines) 100+ lab investigations 100+ imaging/functional studies Infectious, autoimmune, rheumatologic, endocrine, genetic, hematologic, malignant, toxic/medication-related, cardiovascular, metabolic, and primary neurologic causes were systematically excluded. SARS-CoV-2 infection was effectively ruled out: 🚫 Nucleocapsid antibodies negative across 5 separate time points spanning 809–1,433 days post-vaccination, confirmed by 3 independent laboratories. 🚫 Nucleocapsid protein absent in serial skin biopsies obtained 1,160–1,364 days post-vaccination — despite clear spike protein deposition in the same specimens. 📈 Meanwhile, spike antibodies remained persistently elevated, including 4,553 U/mL in January 2026 (1,433 days post-vaccination). Serial blood & tissue sampling (852–1,364 days post-vaccination) revealed: 📍Day 852 — SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein detected within classical & non-classical monocyte subsets via blood-based immune phenotyping/flow cytometric analysis, with associated cytokine abnormalities. 📍Day 1,173 — Free Wuhan spike protein detected in plasma (129.0 ± 4.1 fg/mL) by high-sensitivity ELISA. 📍Day 1,173 — Spike protein detected in circulating exosomes (11.6 ± 0.1 fg/mL) by high-sensitivity ELISA following exosomal isolation. 📍Day 1,284 — Vaccine-derived spike mRNA detected in circulating exosomes by RT-PCR using DNase-treated RNA extraction and amplicon-specific primers targeting three spike ORF regions (S1–S3). PBMC RNA was negative. 📍Days 1,173 & 1,284 — Persistently elevated spike-specific IgG4 concentrations (354.4 ± 22.4 ng/mL; 320.2 ± 4.4 ng/mL) identified by serologic profiling, consistent with sustained antigen exposure. Serial skin biopsies demonstrated: 📍Day 1,160 — Spike protein deposition in endothelial cells & macrophages detected by automated immunohistochemistry with histopathologic correlation; nucleocapsid protein absent. 📍Day 1,249 — Persistent spike protein deposition in endothelial and immune cell compartments by immunohistochemistry; nucleocapsid absent. 📍Day 1,364 — Spike protein detected in endothelial cells, macrophages, and nerve fibers by immunohistochemistry; nucleocapsid absent in the same specimen. 📍Day 1,364 — Plasmid DNA elements detected in skin tissue — including spike gene sequences (S1–S3), ori1/ori2, and SV40 enhancer fragments — confirmed by PCR amplification with agarose gel electrophoresis and Sanger sequencing. Whole-genome sequencing structural variant analysis at 1,277 days post-vaccination revealed widespread genomic instability, with large duplications and deletions affecting EGFR, MYC, ERBB2, and ETV6/RUNX1, while RNA–DNA comparison showed RNA-only variants in ribosomal, NMD, small-RNA, epigenetic, and TP53 pathways. Transcriptomic profiling of whole blood highlighted oxidative stress, vascular activation, and nuclear fragility. Urine proteomics using quantitative mass spectrometry confirmed systemic inflammation with complement overactivation (CFH), redox imbalance (PRDX1), and sustained antibody responses, supported by risk alleles HLA-B07:02 and DRB1*11:04. This longitudinal, multi-laboratory investigation provides direct evidence that mRNA vaccine–derived genetic material and its translated protein products can persist in humans for years following administration, with reproducible detection across multiple independent laboratories, distinct biological compartments, and complementary molecular detection systems extending beyond 3.5 years after the final dose. Spike protein, spike mRNA sequences, and plasmid backbone elements were identified in both immune cells and somatic tissue, with continued absence of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein or antibodies, effectively excluding prior infection as the source. In parallel, multi-omic analyses revealed sustained genomic instability and transcriptomic dysregulation more than 3.5 years post-vaccination, suggesting that persistent vaccine-derived material may be associated with long-term alterations in host genomic and molecular pathways. Yes, we were lied to.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Within 36 hours, irrefutable molecular evidence will be released with major global implications. 200+ specialist evaluations across 18 medical disciplines 100+ advanced laboratory investigations 100+ imaging /functional diagnostic studies 70+ alternative diagnoses ruled out https://t.co/6JcAzsEWGd

@CeesCees72 - Cees

Brief die een huisarts uit Lelystad aan zijn patiënten stuurde. Informed Consent: 1/2 In tweet 2/2: de reactie van Hugo https://t.co/B3Sxp6umeK