TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

0rf
Posted - May 17, 2023 at 10:22 PM
Saved - July 27, 2023 at 7:36 PM

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

Why RFK Jr. is convinced the CIA killed his father:

Video Transcript AI Summary
Paul Shrade, a union leader and close friend of the speaker's father, was present when his father was shot. Shrade believes that Sirhan did not kill the speaker's father. The speaker explains that Sirhan fired two shots, one hitting Shrade and the other hitting a door jam behind his father. Several people grabbed Sirhan, but he managed to fire six more shots, hitting multiple people. The speaker suggests that a security guard named Eugene Saint Saeser, who was holding his father's arm, likely fired the shots that killed his father. The LAPD's investigation was botched, with evidence and photographs destroyed. The speaker also mentions the involvement of a mob attorney representing Johnny Roselli, who had ties to the CIA.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Paul Shrade, who was with my father when he was shot, as a union leader, one of the heads of the United Auto Workers. He was the guy who recruited Cesar Chavez into the labor movement. And and he introduced him to my father, and they became best friends. And so Paul was very, very close by and was with him. The 1st bullet had Sirhan fired. Hit Paul Shradd in the head. Paul Shradd has never believed A Serhan killed my father. Wow. He knows that he shot him. A Serhan. And and so I and Paul forced me to sit down to read the autopsy report, stuff I never wanted to do. And to look at all the evidence that has accumulated since my father's f n Speaker 1: So Ethel's your mother. Right? Speaker 0: Ethel's my mother. Alright. Oh, Sirhan was it was 77 eyewitnesses in the kitchen of the Ambassador Hotel, and my father was killed. And many, many of them had a a view of what happened. A very few of them could view the whole thing, but they could view parts of that. Everybody without exception places their hand, 5 feet to 10 feet away from my father in front of them. He never got behind him. He was always in front with a table between them. Steam table. Sirhan fired 2 shots at my father. The first one hit balls right in the head. The second 1 hit a door jam at my father's head level behind my father. Then he was grabbed by Carl Auker, who was the, who was the concierge at the Ambassador Hotel, and by Raeford Johnson and and 6 other people. It was a dog pile, and they all piled on him, and they grabbed. The first thing they did was grab his hand. It directed in the opposite direction, and they could not get the gun away from him. And he was powerful as a, like, Superman, they said. They were all trying to take the gun away from him. He's a little guy, And he fired 6 shots in the other direction. All of them hit people. 1 person got hit twice, but all those bullets are accounted for. There were only 8 Chambers and his gun. And 2 were fired toward my father and 6 in the opposite direction. And we know what happened to every one of those bullets. My father was shot 4 times. One of their shots, and they all 4 times were from behind. Right. And with a gun that was, that was and they were all what the coroner, Thomas Noguchi, said contact shots. And the barrel of the gun was touching my father when the when the trigger was pulled. And he had carbon tattoos from all four shots. One of the shots went harmlessly through his sleeve and through his shoulder pad. All of the shots were fired from a low angle toward the ceiling. Whoever fired those shots was standing behind him because dealing the gun, and firing at the same time that Sirhan was distracting people essentially. And the person who almost certainly fired those shots was a security Guard, who was holding my father's arm at that time called Eugene Saint Saeser. And a dozen people saw him with his gun drawn. My father fell back on him. And as he fell, he turned and pulled off the Caesars clip untie. Caesar lied to the police about this gun. He told many, many different stories about when he had drawn his gun. He lied. He said he did own a 22. The police didn't talk to him, and I didn't confiscate his gun. The time they talked to him, he said, yeah, I own the 22, but I sold it a month before the shooting. As it turns out, that was a lie. He sold it a month after the shooting, and he sold it to a man who worked at him with him in the high security section of a Lockheed factory here in Los Angeles, who then moved to Arkansas, later talked to investigators and said, yeah, he he had a receipt from when it was sold. And it was sold in July. My father was Kelvin Chin. And Caesar told him at that time, this gun was used in a crime, so don't talk to anybody about it. Caesar it as it turns out, what is a c l a s. And he died about 3 weeks ago. And he died in the Philippines where he's lived for the past 3 decades. And, But he's almost certainly the person who who killed my father. Now, his job as a security guard that I he got 5 days before, when it was already known that my father be speaking there. We don't know exactly what happened, but there are and then the investigation was a botched investigation appears to have been deliberately botched by the LAPD. It was run by people all within the LAPD, all of whom had they were there was a special unit created called Special Unit Senator, in my father's at death. Almost all the members of that unit were ex CIA agents who had, trained in the CIA farm in in Virginia, and shipped down to Latin America to do dirty tricks work there and then brought back for this investigation. And they destroyed before Sirhan's trial. They they destroyed 1200 pieces of evidence, including all the bullets. And and and about 1200 photographs as well that were taken in the room that night. You know, there's a lot of questions. There's never there really I believed that there had been a trial. As it turns out there was in a trial. Oerhan's attorney was an attorney who somehow, and nobody can explain how, he was a mob attorney who was representing Johnny Roselli, who had been at that time there was a famous trial in Los Angeles called the Friars Club trial. You know what Friars Club is. Speaker 1: Please. What Speaker 0: is that? Friars Club is where they started roasts. Speaker 1: Oh, okay. Speaker 0: And it was It was all the Rat Pack, actors, Joey Bishop and Frank Sinatra and Dean. And Dean Martin. Dean Davis. Yeah. All of those guys were members of prior club, and they'd get together every couple of months and roast one of their members. And to get in there, you had to be wearing a tux. And they also had a gambling, a poker game or a gambling casino. I'm not sure which, but there was a poker game in there. And as it turns out, Johnny Roselli was the owner of the club. Johnny Roselli was the CIA's liaison to the model. Speaker 1: That's a trip. You know, I used to read about him. He was in the twenties too. Speaker 0: Yeah. He was an interesting guy, he was a devout Catholic. He he didn't have a home address, but he was tied in with Giancana, but also Carlos Massello and Trafficante. He had installed secret cameras in the Friars Club, so they could read everybody's cards, and they were cheating. He got caught, and he was on trial at the time my father was killed. And it was a huge trial. During that trial, his attorney got arrested for having the grand jury transcripts, which is illegal for anybody to have. It's a serious crime. He'd go to jail for it. And somehow, he had got the transcripts of the grand jury. So, and clearly the mafia had to bribe somebody to get that, given it to the attorney. The attorney wouldn't tell where he got it, He was facing criminal charges, also disbarment. And in the middle of all that, he was somehow appointed as Sirhan's attorney. He told Sirhan to plead guilty. If Sirhan had pleaded innocent, there was no way that he could have gotten Speaker 1: convicted because the bullets that were in his gun, the Speaker 0: bullets that were in Because the bullets that were in his gun the bullets that killed my father did not match the ballistics of the bullets in his gun with the bullets that hit the other 8 people in the world. Speaker 1: Cover up big time.
RobertKennedyJr
Posted - September 10, 2023 at 1:51 AM
Saved - September 10, 2023 at 4:10 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The long-standing magic bullet theory, central to the JFK assassination, has been debunked. Former CIA Director Allen Dulles, who was dismissed by my uncle, played a role in its creation. Recent revelations by JFK's Secret Service protector, Paul Landis, have forced even the New York Times to acknowledge its absurdity. [Link to article]

@RobertKennedyJr - Robert F. Kennedy Jr

The magic bullet theory is now dead. This preposterous construction has served as the mainstay of the theory that a single shooter murdered President Kennedy since the Warren Commission advanced it 60 years ago under the direction of the former CIA Director Allen Dulles whom my uncle fired. The recent revelations by JFK’s Secret Service protector Paul Landis have prompted even the New York Times-among the last lonely defenders of the Warren Report-to finally acknowledge its absurdity. https://nytimes.com/2023/09/09/us/politics/jfk-assassination-witness-paul-landis.html

HumanDilemma_
Posted - September 14, 2023 at 2:09 AM
Saved - September 14, 2023 at 2:56 AM

@HumanDilemma_ - HumanDilemma

Retired secret service agent reveals that there was a second shooter at JFK’s assassination

Video Transcript AI Summary
Retired FBI agent Paul Landis, a former Secret Service agent on Jackie Kennedy's protection detail, claims to have found the "magic bullet" that was part of the JFK assassination. The bullet, known as Warren Commission exhibit 399, was found in almost pristine condition and was believed to have entered JFK's back, exited his throat, and then hit Texas governor John Connally. Landis argues that it would have been impossible for Lee Harvey Oswald, the supposed shooter, to fire two shots in less than a second with the rifle he had. Landis suggests that there was a second shooter in Dealey Plaza, contradicting the Warren Commission's conclusion that Oswald acted alone. Landis plans to discuss this further in a podcast or video with his partner, a retired Secret Service agent.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As a retired FBI agent, I was, greatly intrigued by some news that came out over the weekend. So 88 year old Paul Landis, a former Secret Service agent who was actually on Jackie Kennedy's protection detail in Dallas on November 22, 1963, the day that JFK was assassinated, he's written a book and he gave an interview to The New York Times claiming that he, found what isn't has been called the, the magic bullet. It's commission Warren Commission exhibit 399. It's a bullet in almost pristine condition that the Warren Commission concluded, had entered JFK's back, exited his throat, and then went into Texas governor John Connally through his back and down through his ribs and out, hit his wrist, and then ended up in his leg. That bullet at the time, at least according to the Warren Commission, was found on a stretcher, in Parkland Hospital some few maybe a couple hours after, the president was pronounced dead based on really the the timing that's that the that the, Zapruv er film captured. Oswald, the supposed shooter, would have had to have fired 2 shots in less than a second, which was impossible to do with the rifle that he had. He had a bolt action rifle that I think, they scientifically showed, takes 2.3 seconds to aim, fire, and work the bolt for a second shot. A weapons engineer had the best score. Three hits in 5.2 seconds. And so just based on what what you see in these recruiter film, there just wasn't time. There was no time for, Oswald to have fired shots that hit Kennedy and Connolly within that time timeframe on the, Supreme Court film. So that said, what that means is what you can draw from all of that that I've kinda gone the long way around the barn to explain to you. What it means is that there was a 2nd shooter in Dealey Plaza, which completely obliterates the Warren Commission binding, the Warren Commission being the official US government position that Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone assassin, and that there was no conspiracy. Talked to Todd, my partner here with Texas Crime Travelers, who's a retired Secret Service agent, we are gonna go in-depth on this and do a really long podcast or video, maybe both, where we're gonna talk about this and what the implications are, because, I truly believe it is history changing. So stay tuned. Keep those comments and questions coming. I love getting that stuff, and
RealPatrickWebb
Posted - November 20, 2023 at 6:15 PM
Saved - November 21, 2023 at 12:17 AM

@RealPatrickWebb - Patrick Webb

BREAKING: Never before seen footage reveals doctors who tried to save President John F. Kennedy after his assassination claim there was more than one shooter, they were then threatened to keep quiet following mysterious deaths of witnesses close to JFK's assassination.

ZT_Followers
Posted - January 12, 2024 at 3:03 AM
Saved - January 12, 2024 at 4:20 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
President John F. Kennedy was assassinated because he wanted to disclose the truth about Roswell and the alien presence. He believed that the public could handle this information without panic, but the CIA, influenced by the Service-to-Self aliens, wanted to keep it for themselves. They used their influence with MJ12 to push for JFK's assassination. The incident reinforced the need to keep elected officials in the dark about MJ12 to protect them. JFK learned about this through leaks and shared it with his girlfriend, who could easily reveal it.

@ZT_Followers - ZetaTalk Followers: Watch X, Planet X, aka Nibiru

While many agendas were at play, the main reason JFK was assassinated was because of Roswell and the Alien Presence. ZetaTalk: President Kennedy Note: written on Nov 15, 1996 President John F. Kennedy was killed under orders of MJ12 as he was threatening to tell the American public the truth about Roswell. JFK was of the opinion that the public would accept the fact of the alien presence without undue panic, but in those days MJ12 was still affronted with the personalities and actions of the Service-to-Self aliens that the CIA, as an arm of MJ12, continually made alliances with. JFK believed in the strength of the human spirit, in its ability to sort things out, and in any case felt the public had the right to know what they were facing. The CIA wanted the knowledge they hoped to get from the Service-to-Self aliens who were playing them along, and they wanted this knowledge for themselves and themselves only. Thus, they used their influence with MJ12, which in those days was considerable, to press for JFK's assassination, which they were allowed to implement when the order was finally given. MJ12 has recently released us from our agreement to remain silent on the Kennedy assassination. This agreement to remain silent covered certain matters involving the Secret Government and the alien presence. Should humans be incensed by this, that we knew something they desired to know but would not share the information, they should contemplate what life might be like without our having an agreement with the government. In this situation, only the Service-to-Self aliens would be communicating, having as you say the inside track. Such was the situation when we first encountered your government, which had been vastly misinformed and was engaged in all manner of harmful practices under the influence of the Service-to-Self crowd. This has now turned around, but we are honorable in our agreements, and a promise made was to be a promise kept. The JFK incident is one which hardened and increased the determination to keep elected officials in the dark as much as possible about the existence and activities of MJ12. Given that the US is a democracy and could potentially elect a dark horse written in on the ballot, such stringent rules about non-disclosure kept elected officials from the danger of being killed. Prior to JFK, presidents and other elected officials were already being kept in the dark, a decision made by an exiting president who did not want a rival political party granted such knowledge. JFK learned what he did due to leaks, shared this with a girlfriend long known to be so reliant on sedatives that she could be expected to murmur forth this information with the next man who shared her pillow, and argued incessantly with MJ12 representatives who came to visit him under other pretenses. All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com https://zetatalk.com/govmt/g00.htm

ZetaTalk: Government zetatalk.com
MattWalshBlog
Posted - July 13, 2024 at 11:57 PM
Saved - July 14, 2024 at 2:37 AM

@MattWalshBlog - Matt Walsh

A roof with a direct sightline to the stage was not secured by secret service. Our choices here are extreme unbelievable negligence or something much worse.

@sentdefender - OSINTdefender

The Shooter at the Trump Rally in Pennsylvania can be seen Dead on the Roof of a nearby Building, after being Killed by U.S. Secret Service Agents. https://t.co/6eUpiqfCeL

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is excited to see someone and points out a person nearby. They speculate that the person may have been hit because of their reaction.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nice semen. Let's go. He's right there. You can see the guy there. Let's because you're burning. They might be a little I I think they hit him because the guy is so what's that?
amuse
Posted - July 14, 2024 at 1:26 PM
Saved - July 14, 2024 at 4:04 PM

@amuse - @amuse

RUMOR: I have heard from three different sources that the counter sniper team had the shooter in their sights and requested permission to engage but were told not to fire. Only AFTER the assassin fired did they return fire. It is unclear who the counter sniper team was with.

AmeraucanaLover
Posted - July 14, 2024 at 10:44 PM
Saved - August 4, 2024 at 4:35 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve come across numerous rumors regarding a person named Jonathan Willis and his alleged involvement with the Secret Service. I can't confirm the authenticity of some images, but there's a notable delay between the identification of a shooter and his neutralization. According to screenshots attributed to Willis, he claims he had the shooter in his sights for three minutes but was ordered not to engage by his superiors. He states he disobeyed orders, fired at the shooter, and faced consequences, including losing his job and being questioned by the FBI.

@AmeraucanaLover - Cathlina Rivas King 🇺🇸

so many rumors but it should be fiery easy to verify, DOES/DID anyone named #JonathanWillis work for the Secret Service ? I can’t confirm the below images BUT there is no denying that there was a significant time lapse from the time the shooter was identified till he was taken out. WHY❓ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Here are some screenshots allegedly from SS sniper Jonathan Willis saying he had the assassin in his sights for 3 minutes, but he was told not to engage by the head of the SS unit. The photos state: Slide 2: THEY WOULDN’T LET ME TAKE OUT THE SHOOTER. “My name is Jonathan Willis, I’m the officer in the famous photo of the two snipers on the roof at Trump’s rally. I came here to inform the public that I had the assassin in my sights for at least 3 minutes, but the head of the secret service refused to give the order to take out the perp. 100% the top brass prevented me from killing the assassin before he took the shots at president Trump.” Slide 3: “I didn’t follow the orders though, as soon as the shooter opened on Trump I returned fire despite strict orders to not engage. I had eyes on the shooter for three minutes watching him fiddle with his rifle and adjust the scope, it was obvious he was a shooter yet I wasn’t allowed to engage. After I killed the shooter I was arrested, questioned by the FBI, and just released an hour ago. Already lost my job for not following orders, but I’m glad I took the shots anyway.” “Some of you know nothing.”

Ultrafrog17
Posted - July 17, 2024 at 7:56 PM
Saved - August 8, 2024 at 5:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explored the CIA's MK Ultra program and its potential to create lone gunmen, highlighting Dr. Milton V. Kline's claims about hypnosis. I examined Sirhan Sirhan's case, suggesting he was a programmed patsy in RFK's assassination, and noted inconsistencies in evidence and police actions. I connected this to Lee Harvey Oswald, suggesting he was also manipulated. Kanye West's experiences with a handler and Charles Manson's involvement in MK Ultra further illustrate the government's dark history with mind control. Hollywood, too, hints at these truths.

@Ultrafrog17 - Green Lives Matter

How the CIA creates Lone Gunmen through the MK Ultra Program to silence Opposition. 🧵

@Ultrafrog17 - Green Lives Matter

The CIA is capable of creating lone gunman in three to six weeks with a trained therapist and hypnotherapy. Dr. Milton V. Kline, former consultant to the CIA's supersecret behavior-modification project Bluebird, is currently cam- paigning for strict legal constraints on hypnosis said exactly this in a now declassified document: “He was outspoken in his belief that one of the central goals of these ex- periments-to create a hypnotized, remote-control assassin-was entire- ly possible, though he denies knowl- edge of any "terminal experiments" that would have tested his theories. The fictional Manchurian can- didate, presented in Richard Con- don's thriller and later in a movie starring Frank Sinatra, is, in Kline's mind, still a frighteningly real specter. "It cannot be done by everyone," he argues. "It cannot be done consistently, but it can be done." Kline claims that given the proper subject and circumstances, by using hypnosis he could produce such a killer in three to six weeks.” Document: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp90-00552r000303090037-8

EX-CIA DOC LEADS FIGHT TO LIMIT HYPNOSIS | CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov) cia.gov

@Ultrafrog17 - Green Lives Matter

Under hypnosis, Sirhan Sirhan remembers a woman who gave him coffee and lead him to a dark place. He was lying on a table and then the next thing he remembers is being restrained after shooting at RFK. He literally can't remember anything in between. A dark place and a coffee? Was he drugged? Was he under hypnosis when the event happened? Did you know that Sirhan joined the mystical order of the Rosa Crucians and took to self-hypnotism. This means he was a perfect person to act as the patsy, someone who was easily programmable.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I don't remember the details of cheating or the shooting. I started remembering things clearly when facing death row, maybe a year or two later. The crime was beyond tragic, impacting not just the Kennedy family but also the public and victims. It was a nightmare for everyone involved.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What do you remember about cheating if you're willing to talk about that? Speaker 1: I I was, obviously I was there. But, I don't remember the exact moment. I don't remember pulling my gun, out of my body or wherever it was located and I don't remember aiming it at any human being. I don't remember any of that. I'm sorry. And and I've said that from the get go. Yeah. I understand. So it's I've left the I'm trying to evade No. I understand. Speaker 0: Let me just ask you a question. When did you start remembering things after the shooting? When was what was the first thought that Speaker 1: you had after the shooting? Everything was always hazy in my head about that. And, attorney Peter who passed away was trying to get, a specialist, doctor Herbert Spiegel in New York to hypnotize me and to recognize me and to do all that. Speaker 0: But when did you start remembering things clearly after the show? Speaker 1: I I really don't remember things clearly about it other than that I'm Speaker 0: not asking about cheating part. I'm asking afterwards. When did you start remembering things in in, in reality? Speaker 1: In reality. All all all the reality of this whole thing hit me when I was on death row facing my own death. Speaker 0: So how many months later was that? Speaker 1: Oh, I would say maybe maybe a maybe a year or 2 years. Speaker 0: You don't remember a lot of things between the shooting and and being on death row? Speaker 1: I wasn't too much worried about that, mister Prismic. I was worried about saving my loan but from from execution. Speaker 0: One of the things that we look at, in your case here, in every case is different, was the crime itself. And this indeed, there is I mean, every murder, which is predominantly what we deal with, are is horrible. Certainly to the individual and to the perpetrator, that being the inmate. It certainly is horrible to the family. The individuals, you gotta listen here, Doug. Individuals, lose in in a very, dramatic fast way, a loved ones that can never be replaced. But this crime went far beyond that, and we need to recognize that. Mister Kennedy was was a winning candidate in California. As you know, I'm repeating things we already know. And there was a ground swell, that was a very popular brand, Groundswell, for, his the hope that that he gave some people, a Speaker 1: lot of people. Speaker 0: So indeed, it wasn't just Kennedy family, which was certainly large enough and and, prominent enough, to be of, a tragic nature. There was, there was a loss prior to that. There was indeed a a You're not gonna talk in the middle of my, my you're you're going backwards here, Speaker 1: and you Speaker 0: need to stay on track and just listen. I'm giving you our reasons for that. Speaker 1: If I if I was to give you a piece of paper and a pencil and I wrote down 123, the Kennedy family and the the Kennedy's. I I would say, the Kennedy family and the and the Kennedys. I I would say that I would treat them all equally, and the victims, who were who were injured in this and and the public and and and and Bobby Kennedy's friends and the people who voted for. This is this whole thing was a it it's a a horrible nightmare really for not just for me but for you people and for the whole country and especially for the for the family members. And and and and and mister Waisel and the others who were injured in this.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Doctor Dimon hypnotized Sirhan to recreate the night of Robert Kennedy's assassination, suspecting he was programmed to forget. Clues at the scene suggested Sirhan was in a trance. Sirhan showed unusual strength and dilated pupils when arrested, hinting at possible drugging. Sirhan's quick susceptibility to hypnosis and strange behavior post-assassination raised suspicions of manipulation. A head injury in 1966 changed Sirhan's demeanor, leading him to delve into mysticism and self-hypnosis. His interest in the Rosicrucians and mysterious behavior puzzled those around him.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of the problems doctor Dimon had was that Sirhan couldn't remember the actual shooting of Robert Kennedy. So he put him under hypnosis and had him recreate the night of the assassination. Speaker 1: He went back to the hotel in search of coffee and met a girl by a coffee urine. Once brought out of hypnosis, Sirhan again couldn't remember. Speaker 0: To me, it was obvious that he had been, programmed to kill Robert Kennedy and programmed to forget that he'd been programmed. And there were all kinds of clues that night that the police tried to suppress, as a matter of fact. One key scene, he's looking over the shoulder of a teletype operator in a press room near the, Ambassador Pantry. And, she reported to the police that he seemed in a kind of a trance. And the police told her, you don't tell anybody that. After they finally subdued him, George Plimpton, the writer, reported that Sirhan's eyes were enormously peaceful. Strange. Speaker 1: In the struggle for the gun, Sirhan showed enormous strength resisting Kennedy's bodyguards. When arresting officers shone a flashlight in his eyes, his pupils were dilated and didn't react, suggesting he may have been drugged. Speaker 0: The stunning thing about Sirhan and stunning fact about him is that he went under hypnosis so quickly and so willingly and was so highly programmable to do things like climbing the bars of his cell like a monkey under post hypnotic suggestion. If there had been some handlers, whether from the CIA or whoever, they had a pretty fit subject on their hands there in Sirhan and Sirhan. Doctor Diamond shied away from that theory that Sirhan was a Manchurian candidate. I think because he didn't want to look silly and it was a pretty outlandish theory. But the fact that so many years have passed and he stuck to that story, lead me to think that he really didn't remember shooting Robert Kennedy. That he probably killed Kennedy in a trance and was programmed to forget that he'd done it and programmed to forget, the names and identities of others who might have helped him do it. Speaker 1: In 1966, Sirhan left home to work as a stable boy and trained to be a jockey. But a few months later, a nasty foal ended his career before it started. Speaker 2: He was working a horse and due to the fog it, bucked him into the railing and he had a severe injury to the head. And, he wasn't the same afterwards. He was a little a little shaky. I don't know how to describe it. He just wasn't himself. He was a little aloof and, a little more tense and what have you. And he just wanted to be more or less by himself after that for some odd reason. Speaker 1: After the fall, Sirhan's interest in mysticism grew. He joined the mystical order of the Rosicrucians and took to hypnotizing himself in his room. Speaker 2: He had a, a fish weight hanging from the, the light in his room. And, I asked him what that was all about and he said it has something to do with his mystical powers, so to speak. Once in a while he'd get mail, you know, from the, Rosicrucians and mom would ask him what that was all about And, he didn't he didn't really elaborate much.

@Ultrafrog17 - Green Lives Matter

Kennedy speaks on his father's death and how MK Ultra and the CIA may have played a role. -Sirhan Sirhan was small in stature. He had superhuman strength at that moment. The bullet that killed Kennedy was shot from behind yet Sirhan was never behind him. The carbon tattoo showed that the bullet came from mere inches from his head. They can account for every bullet out of the gun fired by Sirhan. -The police destroyed evidence at the scene. Destroyed photos and would not take the gun to trial. -Sirhan had vivid memories of staying in a hospital for months yet the hospital only had records of him staying at an hour after he "hit his head." -The man behind Robert Kennedy, Thane Eugene Cesar, was a self-proclaimed CIA agent. He hid to the Philippines after and no one questioned him.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the suspicious circumstances surrounding his father's assassination, implicating a security guard named Eugene Caesar. He mentions Caesar's involvement in steering his father into the line of fire and the discrepancies in the autopsy report. The speaker also touches on the possibility of hypnosis being used on Sirhan Sirhan, the convicted assassin. Additionally, he hints at potential connections to MK Ultra and strange incidents involving Sirhan at a horse track and a hospital. The speaker expresses a desire to ask unanswered questions about the case.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He's kinda got an interesting background besides being a, you know, having this high intelligence classification, a series of military of the top military contractors. And if you're you know, those military contractors, a lot of people who work for them are CIA. So you have to, sign they're either CIA assets or agents. You have to sign in order to work there, in order to get the classification, you have to sign a state secrecy agreement, which makes you basically a lifetime CIA asset. And so and he identified himself. There's a writer called Lisa Pease who really did a deep dive into him. And at one point, he identified himself as a CIA agent, and that's in her book. They they pinned him against the steering table, and they took his gun hand, and they put it pushed it away from my father, pointing the opposite way. Mhmm. But Raver Johnson later told me he was trying to pry the gun out of Sirhan's, and Sirhan's this little guy. When I met him in prison, he was I the first thing that impressed me is how tiny and frail he looked. But Raeford Johnson said that he had superhuman strength. And he then fired off 6 more shots and emptied the chamber, but exactly the opposite direction of my father, and all of those shots hit people. Mhmm. So we know what happened to every bullet in his gun. He was always in front of my father and, never got behind him. But the bullets that killed my father, according to Thomas Noguchi's autopsy report, Thomas Noguchi was the most important coroner in American history, and my father's autopsy is called the perfect autopsy. Because Noguchi knew that what had happened in Dallas with my uncle with the autopsy was completely botched. And so he wanted to make sure nobody you know, to avoid all that criticism. So he flew in the chief coroner of all the armed service every branch of the armed service and a lot of other famous coroners, and they all sat in the theater and watched him perform the autopsy. And what his autopsy found is my father was shot 4 times from behind, never from in front. Mhmm. The shots one of the shot passed heartlessly through his shoulder pad. The other 3, 2 lodged in his back. The other one was right behind his ear. And that in each case, they were contact shots, meaning the barrel of the gun was touching his skin or half an inch from it, and they left carbon tattoos. And they all had an upward angle so that whoever was doing it was standing behind my father and and holding the gun, not directly at him like that, but at an angle where you could keep him closer. So it's almost like And the guy who was in that position is a guy called Eugene Thein Caesar, and he was a security guard who was hired 2 days before Oh. When my father's schedule was already known. Speaker 1: So now he's walking through this kitchen, which he shouldn't be walking through. He's got this Speaker 0: Well, my my security guy. He grabbed the security guard is the guy who steered him into the ambush. That's exactly. Had my father's elbow, and he was he was directing him. And then, you know, Zurin starts firing. My father then falls back, and he lands on Caesar. Speaker 1: Caesar and Wait. Eugene is what's his last Speaker 0: name? Eugene Thane Caesar. Speaker 1: Phane Cesar. Speaker 0: Thane. T. Speaker 1: H. Phane. Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 0: And my father must have known he was being shot from behind because the last thing he did is rotate and turn and pull off the that says. Wow. Speaker 1: Get the fuck off. Speaker 0: See the original early pictures before my mother took that out and put a rosary in his hand. I'd he originally, he has that tie in his hand, and there's pictures of Cesar from that night that don't have a tie on. Cesar Cesar was was seen by all the eyewitnesses with his gun drawn. When he pushed my father off, he had his gun drawn. He was asked by the police why why did you have your gun drawn? He said I was shooting at Sirhan, but there's no evidence for that. And then he was caught in multiple, multiple lies about what he did with the gun that the police did not take the gun from him that night. Thank you. He was There was Speaker 1: a gun that was fired at the scene, and the police And Speaker 0: the police did not take it. And and they, you know, the police also destroyed all the photos before trial. They collected every photo taken in that room, 22100 photos, and destroyed them all. Speaker 1: Who who hired Eugene? You said he was Speaker 0: last I hired by a company called A Security, but he had a real job. His real job was at the Boeing plant, and he had a high security clearance. He was allowed in this the top secret parts of the plant. Before that, he had worked for Hughes Engineering, which, you know, Howard Hughes was very much, you know, people Robert Mayhew, who is his deputy, was deeply involved in the Kennedy the JFK assassination. There's no way Saran could have been convicted because the gun the bullets that are in my father did not match the bullets that were in other people. It didn't come from the same Speaker 1: Also, 13 shots fired. Sirhan's gun only holds 8. Exactly. So we know that there is not like he's reloading his body. Speaker 0: Audios of it, you know, of the 13 shots. Speaker 1: Okay. Is it possible that any kind of mind altering, experiments or substances were used in both cases? Like, you've heard of MK Ultra? Yeah. Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. Well, MK oh, that's interesting that you'd say that because Speaker 1: because didn't Sirhan say that he Speaker 0: He he believes that he was hematized. And and the and the defense the even the, San Quentin psychiatrist, defense and prosecution of scientists. Also, it was hypnotized. And I'm not arguing this because I really don't know. I'm just saying that there's a lot of fishy stuff about this, but there's a guy called Dan Martin who teaches at Harvard Medical School. Speaker 1: Got him. Speaker 0: You got Speaker 1: it. And, Speaker 0: and he is the world's expert on hypnosis, and he's been in to hypnotize Surin many, many, many times. And he said there there I've talked to him. He said there's 4 classes of of people in hypnosis. Speaker 1: I I Speaker 0: I don't know any of this, but I I think it's number 1, is the people who simply cannot Speaker 1: Cannot be. Speaker 0: Hypnotize. And then 4 is people who are the easiest empathized. And he told me this he said, Suriname is, like, 4.9. Mhmm. And he said that, that when he goes into Sirhan, he takes out he takes out a coin and shows it to Sirhan, and Sirhan immediately goes out. And he he said his his head flips back and it's not starts pointing out of his nose. So his involuntary, his eyes roll up. And then he gives them a post nod suggestion, and they suggest and, for example, he'll say to him, when I you know, after I wake you up, if I ever show you a handkerchief, I want you to climb on the roof of this owl. Oh, then he'll wake him up, and, and he will he'll he'll wait a while, and he'll he'll fool with a handkerchief. And Sirhan will start climbing on the cell. If you he said, if you ask Sirhan why are you doing that, he said, I just need the exercise. He'll deny that he's been hypnotized. So I again, I'm not this gets really deep into sort of conspiracy, and I am not arguing that this happened. Speaker 1: These things are also true. What? You're saying these things are also true. Speaker 0: These these are true, and you can make of them what you will. But and there's a lot of other, you know, really I mean, really interesting parts of the story that are, that are fishy. Speaker 1: And it's not circumstantial to you. It's black and white. I could prove this in a court of law if given the opportunity. Speaker 0: Well, sir, no. Speaker 1: No. The Speaker 0: damn is totally strong. To me, it's all circumstantial. There is no, you know, no confessions. None of that. But with with, with my uncle, I don't I think it's black and white. What happened to this guy, Eugene? Speaker 1: The the security guard Speaker 0: It's interesting. He went to and the whole story is fascinating because, actually, Sirhan worked at a track that apparently was it was I think it was in the name of Dina De La Renta, but the true owner was Mickey Cohen, and he worked at a horse track. And at that horse track, they were on the the stable boys and the walker. He was a walker. He'd never been on a horse before. And the trainers were all experimenting with hypnosis on their lunch breaks, their their different breaks. So they were all, you know, blood hypnotizing each other. And, you know, who knows what happened? Maybe it was a screening, you know, issue there. But I'll just tell you one other interesting fact that you mentioned MK Ultra. One of the the hospitals that apparently was used in MK Ultra was a I think it was a naval base. It was naval in Pasadena. Sir, one day, they said to Sirhan, we want you to get on the horse. He'd never been on his any horse, and they're gonna put him on a thoroughbred and have him race around a quarter mile track. Obviously, he falls off. He hits his head on the rail. He's brought to the Pasadena Hospital. Speaker 1: Get the fuck out of here. Speaker 0: And he his memory is that he stayed in that hospital for 3 months. But when his appeals attorney Great. Went to the hospital and got his records, it said he got forced issues and was discharged in an hour. Wow. And he has very vivid memories of what took place in this hospital. He said there were other people from the track who were also there that had bandages on their heads. Again, this is stuff he says. Right. And, you know, I'm not assigning any credibility to it. I'm just it's part of this, you know, this, it's part of this, you know, a lot of, questions that I would like to ask people that were never asked of people.

@Ultrafrog17 - Green Lives Matter

A week before RFK was killed, he declared that he would remove the clandestine services from the CIA. Not only that, but RFK's first assumption was that the CIA had killed his brother and he posed that very question publicly. Due to his popularity, RFK was about to be put in a position to become President and therefore actually make reforms to the CIA or even dismantle it just as JFK before him had sought to do. According to RFK Cesar was a CIA asset. If this was truly the case, and Sirhan was simply an MK Ultra patsy, then now you know why they would have the motive to implement this plan. RFK and JFK were both existential threats to the military-industrial complex and the above-the-law operations of the CIA. JFK himself told us that he wanted to splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it into the wind. Neither he nor his brother wanted to participate in the Vietnam War which turned out to be a CIA playground for psyop operations and countless crimes against humanity. The CIA has never answered for these crimes and the Biden administration has actually been slow-rolling the release of information pertaining to the case. Imagine what the world would have looked like had the Kennedy vision of dismantling the CIA taken place. Certainly, there would have been a lot fewer wars and regime changes disguised as "wars on terror."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Kennedy family had a long-standing feud with the CIA. Joseph Kennedy, John, and Robert Kennedy all opposed the CIA's actions. Before his assassination, John Kennedy planned to reform the CIA by removing its clandestine services. Following JFK's death, his brother Robert questioned the CIA's involvement. Robert contacted the CIA desk officer, a Bay of Pigs leader, and the head of the CIA to ask if the agency was responsible for his brother's death. Robert suspected the agency's involvement in JFK's assassination. Translation: The Kennedy family had a history of conflict with the CIA, with Joseph, John, and Robert Kennedy all criticizing the agency. John Kennedy intended to restructure the CIA before his assassination. After JFK's death, Robert questioned the CIA's potential role in the assassination, suspecting their involvement.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The 40 year tension between my family and the CIA. Speaker 1: The Kennedy feud with the CIA was multigenerational. The family patriarch Joseph Kennedy sat on a commission that called for an end to the CIA's parliamentary operations, and his sons John and Robert Kennedy both railed against the CIA's role in Vietnam. Speaker 0: And actually, my father, a week before he was killed, that the first thing he was gonna do was to remove the clandestine services from the CIA and make the CIA what was supposed to be, which was an intelligence gathering organization. Speaker 2: The first phone call that my father made after j Edgar Hoover told him that his brother had been shot was to the CIA desk officer in Langley who was only a mile from our house. Yeah. And and and my father said to him, did your people do this? His next call was to Harry Ruiz who was one of the Cuban Bay of Pigs leaders who had remained very, very close to our family and to my father. My father asked him the same question. Then my father called John McComb, who was the head of the CIA, and asked him to come to the house. McComb came over and when I came home from he said, well, for end school, my father was walking in the yard, which I'm Macomb, and my father was posing the same question to him. Was it our people who did this to my brother? So it was my father's first instinct at the agency had killed his brother.

@Ultrafrog17 - Green Lives Matter

Thane Eugene Cesar was standing directly behind RFK, unlike Sirhan, and told the LAPD that he did, in fact, draw his weapon that night. He was so close to RFK that Cesar's tie was likely pulled off in the mayhem. They never checked his gun according to Sirhan's lawyer and he sold it. Cesar told police he sold the gun three months earlier but a paper trail said differently. And then what happened? He moved out of the country to the Philippines. Remember when Jesus Campos left the country after the Mandalay Bay shooting even though he was the sole eye witness? The playbook seems to remain the same. "Cesar was the obvious first suspect. The police brushed him off and never investigated him further." It gets worse though, there is testimony that the security guard actually shot his gun during the incident. The gun was destroyed by the LAPD before the trial and then inexplicably never examined in connection with the bullets that hit the pantry that day. The man that covered up the gun/bullets was off Scott free after he "mislabeled" his findings. They refused to give him a lie detector test. And they said: We wouldn't give him a test because their findings said differently. To sum it up, They didn't follow the proper procedures and covered up the entire thing.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The main suspect in Robert Kennedy's assassination, security guard Eugene Caesar, was in a position to shoot. His gun was never checked, and evidence of a second gun was destroyed. Allegations against forensic chemist Wolfer were found to be untrue. The murder weapon was not used in sound tests, and a court order was needed to remove it from evidence.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There are a number of candidates for the 2nd gun, but the most obvious one is a security guard named then Eugene Caesar, who was, unlike Sirhan, standing in exactly the position and location he had to be to fire the shots that he had Robert Kennedy. The thing Eugene Caesar was standing behind Robert Kennedy and in contact with him, by his own admission, where the shooting began. He dropped to the floor and reached for his weapon. 1 witness saw him fire. Speaker 1: Cesar's clip on tie lay on the floor beside Robert Kennedy after the shooting. Here we see Cesar without his tie nearly an hour later. Caesar's gun was never checked on the night of the shooting. He told police he had sold his 22 3 months before the assassination. Speaker 0: A receipt proves that it was sold after the assassination. The person who made out this receipt confirmed. Cesar told him at the time of the sale, be careful of this weapon. It was involved in a police shooting. He was the obvious first suspect. The police brushed him off and never investigated him further. Speaker 2: At the time of the shooting, 2 guns were drawn, sir Hans and Caesar's. Caesar's gun was never tested nor even examined. We do not know scientifically whether or not it was fired. We have Caesar's word that it was a 38 and that it was not fired, but we also have Don Schulman's word that a security guard fired his gun in the pantry. In the courtroom, evidence was introduced about 2 guns, sir Hans and the other 22 Ivar Johnson recorded in Los Angeles Police Department Officer Wofford's handwriting as having fired the test bullets. Incredibly, this second gun was destroyed by the Los Angeles Police Department. In November 1970, the state records show that this gun had been destroyed in July 1968 prior to the trial. Speaker 3: On October 11, 1971, this information was declared erroneous by the Los Angeles Police Department Board of Inquiry investigating mister Welfer's performance. The record was corrected to reflect that the test gun was actually destroyed in July 1969. Speaker 2: One way or another, the only gun technically linked to the pantry shooting by mister Wolper's handwriting and testimony is now destroyed. Speaker 3: Attorney Barbara Blair threw the whole thing into the open. She was trying to block mister Wolfer's appointment as chief forensic chemist of the Los Angeles Police Department on grounds that he violated proper ballistics procedures. Los Angeles district attorney Joseph Bush announced the matter would be settled in 2 weeks. Nearly 5 months later, on October 18, 1971, he had this to say. We have reached the conclusion that the charges made against mister Wolfer are untrue. Our findings show he did not violate proper ballistics procedures in the Sirhan trial. The investigation revealed only that mister Wolfer made a clerical error in labeling the trial exhibit envelope containing 3 bullets test fired by him from the gun wrenched out of Sirhan's hand at the assassination scene. Here are excerpts of district attorney Bush's confrontation with newsmen. Speaker 4: Mister Wolf were given a lie detector test by you or the police during this investigation? Speaker 3: He was not given a lie detector by us. Speaker 4: Why? Speaker 3: Well, I don't believe it would be necessary. The allegations as they now stand have arisen about, what is it, two and a half years after the fact. There's never been any question about this. There's never been any impugning of the integrity or that there was any every firing. There is no evidence except for the fact that there was a mista labeled envelope that there could possibly have been a mistake. Speaker 5: But the man's integrity is being challenged publicly, and there are some what are considered some fairly strong arguments against. Now if you're going to if you're going to submit an equally strong argument for your defense, wouldn't it involve a lie detector test at the very least? Speaker 3: Well, I would, personally, I wouldn't subject Wilford to a lie detector test based on what we I would not based on what we have discovered as a result our investigation, I don't see any credence in this at all. Speaker 4: On page 118 of the special unit senator book, chief Oden says that the sound level tests were held on June 20th. And he says, quote, Cernan's gun was fired with the same caliber Speaker 6: of mini mag ammunition at approximately the spot where Kennedy fell. Unquote. Speaker 3: It's not true. Speaker 4: Mister Houghton's book is inaccurate? Speaker 3: That's right. Speaker 4: Is it inaccurate in other respects too? Speaker 3: I have no I have no idea, but that statement is not correct. Rather than take the gun out of evidence that had been introduced on the 7th June, just 2 days after the killing, Another gun was used of a similar make and manufacturer. Speaker 4: Is it not regular procedure to use the murder weapon for any and all tests when when it's possible? Speaker 3: If possible, yes. It is. In this instance, if we it was our judgment that it was better to leave the murder weapon in the custody of a county clerk as a grand jury exhibit. Speaker 4: What would have been required Speaker 6: to get that gun removed? Speaker 3: A court order. Speaker 4: Was the court order a thought? Speaker 5: No.

@Ultrafrog17 - Green Lives Matter

Jesse Watters correctly pointed out that Lee Harvey Oswald was a Marine Corps radar operator with top security clearance at a CIA U2 spy program. What makes this more alarming is that Oswald was likely being experimented on via the CIA's MK-Ultra program at that exact base. People need to understand he was just a chess piece in their arsenal, a useful idiot that was likely programmed. Remember that he was a supposed traitor to the country yet they let him inside the country with literally zero resistance. He was a plant and likely a mind-controlled one at that. Normalize people talking about MK Ultra because it is more than real. It is a dangerous weapon that the CIA has been using for decades. https://theintercept.com/2022/12/19/lee-harvey-oswald-cia-lsd-jfk/ "Atsugi was a launching pad for U-2 spy flights over the Soviet Union and was also a hub of the CIA’s research into psychedelic drugs. “A CIA memo titled ‘Truth Drugs in Interrogation’ revealed the agency practice of dosing agents who were marked for dangerous overseas missions,” wrote author David Talbot in “The Devil’s Chessboard,” his 2015 biography of former CIA Director Allen Dulles. Talbot’s exploration of the link ended there: “Some chroniclers of Oswald’s life have suggested that he was one of the young marines on whom the CIA performed its acid tests.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Lee Harvey Oswald defected to the Soviet Union during the Cold War, claiming allegiance to them. He had insider information from his time as a radar operator in Japan. Upon returning to the US, he was welcomed instead of arrested, leading to theories of him being part of a Navy intelligence program. Oswald was contacted by a CIA asset and sent to Dallas.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who exactly was Lee Harvey Oswald? And why did our government lend a hand to this man? Oswald was discharged from the marines and defected to the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War. He walked into the American Embassy in Moscow, renounced his citizenship, and declared, quote, my allegiance is to the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Oswald confidently told the Soviets he had information of special interest and spent the next 3 years in the USSR. The Soviets were interested in the information Oswald had. Before defecting. Lee Harvey Oswald served as a marine corp radar operator in Japan, a role that gave him crypto clearance higher than top secret to one of the 2 bases where the CIA ran their u two spy planes out of. The very planes used to conduct aerial surveillance over Russian territory. 6 months after Oswald defected to Moscow, a u 2 spy plane was shot down by the Soviet Union. The first time in the Cold War era, the pilot, Francis Gary Powers, raised the question of whether it had something to do with Oswald, the self declared traitor. But the US government didn't treat Oswald like a man who just committed treason. 3 years later, after betraying his country, Oswald decided to come home. And instead of handcuffs, the US Embassy gave Oswald a loan and a passport. And when his passenger ship landed in New Jersey, Oswald, along with his new Russian wife, were welcomed by travel agents with ties to American intelligence. The theory was that Oswald may have been a part of a Navy intelligence program where American officers pretending to be disenchanted with capitalism were dispatched to the Soviet Union. They'd be recruited by the Soviets and then fed back into the United States, acting as what the communist thought were double agents. This would explain why Oswald wasn't arrested for defecting. Instead, he was immediately contacted by George Day Mornschild, known as the Baron, who was working as an intelligence asset for the CIA. The Baron admitted later that a CIA officer told him to contact Lee Harvey Oswald. And what's the first thing he does when he makes contact? The baron moves him like a pawn to Dallas.
Lee Harvey Oswald, the CIA, and LSD: New Clues in Newly Declassified Documents An unredacted memo adds to our understanding of the CIA’s response to allegations that Oswald, the Marine who shot JFK, worked with the spy agency. theintercept.com

@Ultrafrog17 - Green Lives Matter

I’m not convinced Oswald even shot a bullet that day. I think it is more likely that he was told by his handler to be somewhere and then shocked to find himself being arrested suddenly. I’m not convinced he shot the cop either. Witnesses did not see Oswald leave the Depository. Both Vicki Adams and Sandra Styles have corroborating testimony alleging that they were there at the exact time Oswald would have been running down the stairs yet they say they saw nothing. The Warren Commission tried to cover this up. Why? I think we all know why. And then they just so happen to find him in a movie theater after he allegedly shoots a cop even though witnesses said they saw someone else do the shooting? In fact, it’s possible that it was Ruby who shot the cop that day. But I digress. The point is, I don’t believe anything they say, and neither should you. The truth is, Oswald was just another player in the game that saw himself get pinned with the entire conspiracy. The playbook was worked to a tee and he found himself in over his head as his name would go on to live in infamy. He certainly wasn’t innocent and he may have taken part in the plot but I doubt he knew that much given he had a handler and was involved in the MK Ultra program.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Oswald fired shots from the 5th floor, then left the building within minutes. Vicki Adams' testimony contradicted the Warren Commission's timeline, supported by Dorothy Garner's account. The Commission's deception was revealed by suppressed documents and witness testimonies. Reenactments suggested Oswald had time to shoot and hide the rifle. The Review Board's declassification process uncovered evidence placing Oswald elsewhere during the shooting.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yes. I I've I've seen the, reports on this investigation. This man, Oswald, he had fired 3 shots. He then threw the gunner aside, and, he he apparently, had come down, the 5 flights and steps, sideways from the 5th floor that were walking You can prove that? Oh, yes. Oh, yes. We can prove that. Did anybody here anybody had seen it? Most of the employees were down on lower floor, but, he was stopped at the 2nd floor by a police officer. And some, work some manager in the building told the police officer, well, he's alright. He works safe. He he he can hold him. So they let us go. That's why he got out. Speaker 1: From time that I heard those shots, ran into that building and made it up to the 2nd floor. It is approximately a minute and a half to 2 minutes. Speaker 2: And possibly less than 2 minutes, investigators came to the school book building with stopwatches and critical eyes. Not only police and government agents trace that road. Chief justice Warren and some other commission members did it for themselves. Speaker 3: I was interested in finding a specific witness to the assassination, Texas School Book Depository, and she knew Oswald. I went to the National Archives searching for her original testimony. I was told that the tape containing her testimony was missing, and later, I learned that that tape had been destroyed by the Warren Commission. And so I finally ended up finding her and getting her side of the story. Vicki Adams was 22 at the time of the assassination, and she testified that immediately after the assassination, she ran down the backstairs to get outside to see what was going on. If that were true, she would have seen Oswald on the back stairs, but she testified that she saw and heard no one. She had realized that something was wrong because no one was believing her, so she asked David Bellen, who was questioning her, interview Sandra Stowes, a coworker who went down the stairs with me. This became a rather serious problem for the Warren Commission because discrediting 1 woman was easy to do. But discrediting a cooperating witness, that may have been a little bit tougher. So Mellon said, we don't need Sanders House. We have you. Speaker 4: We've had mister Mellon here with us too, one of our counsel who's been here several times. And He knows this city now and very few people do. Very helpful. Speaker 3: According to Vicky's original FBI testimony, she left the window on the 4th floor within 15 to 30 seconds Speaker 4: of Speaker 3: the assassination. The Warren Commission elevated that time to 1 minute. She said she arrived on the first floor within 60 seconds of the assassination. The Warren Commission elevated that time to several minutes. So what the Warren Commission did was successfully deceive the public into thinking that Vicki was just another confused witness. Speaker 2: Case closed. Reenactments prove, the report says, that Oswald did have time, just enough time, to fire the shots, secret the rifle, and get down to the 2nd floor cafeteria. Speaker 3: But in 1999, I found a document in the National Archives that had been suppressed for 35 years. It was a letter written by Assistant US Attorney Martha Jo Stroud. Was a transmittal letter forwarding Vicki's signed testimony to J. Lee Rankin, the head honcho of the Warren Commission's investigation at that point. In the last paragraph of that letter, almost as an afterthought, we're introduced to a woman by the name of Dorothy Garner. Garner was Vicki's immediate supervisor who had stood at the window with Vicki. The letter quotes Garner as saying that she saw Vicki go down the stairs before she saw officer Baker and Roy Truly come up. When I found and interviewed Dorothy Garner, she confirmed everything. She said that she had been at the window with Vicky, that Vicky had left the window immediately, that she actually followed Vicki outside the office and to a point where she could see her going down the stairs. And during that whole time, she never saw Oswald. So the Stroud letter became a very dangerous document for the Warren Commission. Speaker 5: Without the review board's declassification process, we would never have learned of the corroborating testimony of 3 witnesses that provide powerful evidence that Oswald was not on the 6th floor at the time of the shooting.

@Ultrafrog17 - Green Lives Matter

Kanye West exposed to the world that he himself had a MK Ultra handler who was threatening to “drug” him up again. Tucker broke it down on Fox News. It’s shocking that Fox allowed this to air: "At one point he used the phrase make America great again. It was to put it mildly not the kind of thing you normally hear at a rap concert. And then two days later, Kanye West was in the hospital. Well at the house of his family's exercise trainer a man called Harley Pasternak West apparently suffered some kind of mental break. Pasternak called an ambulance to pick him up West was taken away and then he was sedated with at least seven different psychiatric medications including benzodiazepines…lithium sleeping pills and olanzapine. News reports suggested that West had experienced a profound psychiatric episode. He'd gone completely off the deep end. He'd gone crazy and they've been saying that ever since. West over time though told a very different story.....(Pasternak) Once worked for the Canadian military where he participated in experiments that measured the effect of various drugs on the human mind. Is that training relevant to this story? We don't know. We do know that based on this text exchange which again Harley Pasternak has not set his own true or fake. On the basis of that law enforcement agencies definitely ought to be looking very closely at Harley Pasternak. Who by the way apparently has dozens of other celebrity clients. Some of whom seem to be out there campaigning…Based on these texts this looks like a crime. Why is no one investigating it? The fact that no one is investigating it tells you a lot."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Many celebrities campaign for Democrats, but when Kanye West praised Trump, his trainer threatened to medicate him into submission. West posted texts showing the threat, which media ignored. The trainer's military background raises suspicions. Law enforcement should investigate this potential crime.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So in the run up to this week's midterm elections, a lot of celebrities out there campaigning for democratic candidates all over the country. You probably saw them, actors, singers, TikTok personalities, all doing their part for the Democratic Party. You probably weren't surprised by this. It's normal. Pop culture figures always support Democrats. Every single one of them. But if you ever wondered why all of these supposedly creative people reach exactly the same conclusion every time? They're all on the same page. How could that happen? It's interesting question. We don't know the answer, but you should consider what happened when one of the most famous singers in the world broke with the herd. On November 19, 2016, a week and a half after Donald Trump won the presidential election, Kanye West, now known as Ye, held a concert in Sacramento. Most people in the audience were, of course, young people and presumably Hillary Clinton voters and presumably deeply disappointed by her loss a week and a half before. So in the middle of the show, West stopped performing start talking about politics. Google lied to you, he said by suggesting to its users that Hillary was gonna win. Quote, Facebook lied to you. I'm not here to massage you with a fake truth telling you that Hillary's gonna win over and over and over. You were lied to by Google. You were lied to by Mark Zuckerberg. Middle America, West continued, showed you how they felt. Well, this point some of the audience began to boo, but West kept going. He complimented Donald Trump repeatedly. At one point, he used the phrase make America great again. It was to put it mildly, not the kind of thing you normally hear at a rap concert. And then 2 days later, Kanye West was in the hospital. Well, at the house of his family's exercise trainer, a man called Harley West apparently suffered some kind of mental break. Pasternak called an ambulance to pick him up. West was taken away, and then he was sedated with at least 7 different psychiatric medications, including Benzodiazepines, lithium, sleeping pills, and Olanzapine. News reports suggested that West had experienced a profound psychiatric episode. He'd gone completely off the deep end. He'd gone crazy and they've been saying that ever since. West over time though told a very different story. In his telling, after what he'd said on stage in Sacramento, Harley Pasternak was trying to shut him up. Pasternak, he said was not simply a trainer, but instead an agent of ideological control. Pasternak's job was to keep West from straying from the script, and he's willing to use powerful drugs to do it. That's what he said. But very few people took that claim seriously. In fact, it was exactly the kind of thing a crazy person would say. My trainer drugged me into submission. He's trying to make me into a zombie. Right. Sure he did. Have another Olanzapine shot, Kanye. You look tired. So that's where the story stood until the other day. Nobody believed Kanye West. Then West posted something remarkable on Twitter, which for some reason virtually all of American media ignored, which is odd because media outlets are not usually in the business of ignoring things, but they did and what he posted was a picture of a text exchange that he had had with Harley Pasternak. Pasternak was explaining that West had better stop saying quote, crazy stuff. In other words, he better get back on script or else he would be severely punished. Quote, second option, if you don't shut up. Quote, I have you institutionalized again where they medicate the crap out of you and you go back to zombie land forever. Playdate with the kids just won't be the same. End quote. Try if you can to imagine a more sinister threat than that. A more chilling threat than that. Do what I say or I will turn your brain to mush. I will destroy your relationship with your own children. I will send you back to quote, zombie land forever. Effectively, I'll kill you. Now keep in mind, this is from West's quote trainer, not his physician. This is the guy he'd hired to help him do squats. A trainer? Really? Do they talk like that at your gym? Probably not. So what's going on here exactly? Well, according to his bio, Harley Pasternak who is not denied writing these texts once worked for the Canadian military where he participated in experiments that measured the text exchange text exchange, which again, Harley Pasternak has not said is untrue or fake. On the basis of that, law enforcement agencies definitely ought to be looking very closely at Harley Pasternak, who by the way apparently has dozens of other celebrity clients. Some of whom seem to be out there campaigning. Based on these texts, this looks like a crime. Why is no one investigating it? The fact that no one is investigating it tells you a lot.

@Ultrafrog17 - Green Lives Matter

Kanye’s obvious MK Ultra handler, Haley Pasternak talking about his history with special forces and using drugs on soldiers: “Lucky enough to have him as my graduate advisor. And the area of that I was interested in was how drugs and food affect muscular performance And Or when you say drugs would that like performance enhancing drugs are they All kinds of drugs Right Okay So working for the military, I wasn't governed by the same laws that the typical person was So I could look at the impact of certain drugs that are not that are not everyday things. So we looked at a drug called Madaffinil, which was for narcoleptics. So if you give a soldier this…drug how long could they stay awake for without having any health detriment…Is that used now as one of these brain drugs I've I've heard the name before somewhere. Yeah So it's…It's a very interesting modafinil…It will…keep you awake but it's not a stimulant. Right So if a special forces person has to stay awake for three nights waiting for the right opportunity to do whatever they have to do we could give them adaffanil and we'd keep them alert. I did a research on a drug called acetazolamide…”

Video Transcript AI Summary
I studied nutrition and exercise physiology for 10 years and worked as a nutrition scientist for the military. I researched drugs like Modafinil and acetazolamide to enhance performance in soldiers. Modafinil can keep soldiers awake without being a stimulant, while acetazolamide helps with altitude sickness. Additionally, the speaker expresses a willingness to continue speaking out, even if faced with threats or harm.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Lucky enough to have him as my graduate adviser. And the area of that I was interested in was how drugs and food affect muscular performance. And When when you say drugs, were that, like, performance enhancing drugs? Or they all just kind of drugs. Right. Okay. So working for the military, I wasn't governed by the same laws that the typical person was, so I could look at the impact of certain drugs that are not that are not everyday things. So we looked at a drug called Modafinil, which was for narcoleptics. So if you give a soldier this, drug, how long could they stay awake for without, having any health detriment? Is that used now as one of these brain drugs? I've I've heard the name before somewhere. Speaker 1: Yeah. So it's, Speaker 0: it's very interesting. Modafinil, it will keep you awake, but it's not a stimulant. Right. So if a special forces person has to stay awake for 3 nights waiting for the right opportunity to do whatever they have to do, we could give them adafinil and we keep them alert. I did, research on a drug called acetazolamide, which is for use at high altitude so you don't get altitude Speaker 2: then let's have a conversation. But you ain't gonna send Harley Pasternak, Puff Daddy, Meek Mill, Kim Kardashian, none of the usual suspects, and get me to stop talking. You're going to have to take my life. I don't care if you black mirror me. I don't care if you do some of the alternative what the dang way is showing me talk and saying somebody and say, I don't care if you have me fucking a goat on camera. I don't care what you do. You're going to have it. Yeah. And by the way and if you take my life, there's gonna be some college kid, some young Ye, some young pop that's gonna even go harder. It's gonna y'all thought George Floyd was gonna send it up. If you took my life right now, you're gonna see something you never saw. So we might as well have a conversation. Speaker 0: Coffee player, and I spent 10 years in university. I did degrees in nutrition, in exercise physiology. I went on to graduate school where I was a nutrition scientist for the military. I got recruited by the Department of National Defense where I was an exercise

@Ultrafrog17 - Green Lives Matter

Charles Manson became a deranged serial killer after being involved in the government’s MK-Ultra program. His cult members were brainwashed in a similar fashion to all these lone gunmen. Candace broke it down succinctly here: “Charles Manson himself was a FED. Charles Manson was experimenting on behalf of the government with LSD, intentionally drugging people. Our government was obsessed with how to control a mind, and how to create a mass psychosis. They were conducting all sorts of illicit experiments on the American people. This brings us to MK Ultra. The idea that the government is involved in drugging people in an effort to control them. They say MK Ultra ended. Do you think it's ended? No, I don't. Not after the things that YE told me. Not after reading the text messages that were sent to him who he says is his handler. Threatening to drug him and send him back to la la land. Telling him he'll never see his kids again. What happened to Britney Spears? I think that as a nation that we have to be able to confront the fact that there is truly evil, that demons are real. We cannot arm ourselves against this sort of evil if we aren't even able to acknowledge it. I was chilled by not realizing how much evil our government has committed in the past. We cannot fight demons unless we are willing to acknowledge that there are demons. Don't walk away saddened. Walk away being assured that we already know how this ends. In the end, goodness wins. In the end, God wins."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the Diddy lawsuit, implying government control in Hollywood. They mention Kanye West's claims about handlers in Hollywood and Diddy being protected by the government. The speaker promotes the book "Chaos," revealing government involvement in the Manson murders and MK Ultra. They urge readers to confront evil and have faith in the triumph of goodness.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I was also talking about the Diddy lawsuit. It was a very fascinating lawsuit because he was talking about the person who sued him, Hollywood, and how it operates, and it very heavily implied that the government is controlling Hollywood. There's some sort of a gang that is controlling Hollywood, and they freaked out about that. Absolutely. You can't even talk about that. Why is that? And then it sort of reminded me in these conversations that I was was having offline with Ye when all that stuff is going down, he was saying things to me that I just could not compute. You know, he was talking to me about everybody having a handler in Hollywood, you know. He was calling people the ops. You know? This person is in with the government, and he notoriously said that Diddy was a Fed. He said that publicly, Diddy's a Fed. Diddy's a Fed. And everyone was like, Kanye's crazy. And now we're looking at this lawsuit, and we're going, okay. Wait a second. Clearly, Diddy was being protected by the government. Clearly, Diddy had a person he could call who would just clean up a mess if he shot someone, which the person in the lawsuit is alleging that he did and that he was able to get it cleaned up and was able to get the media to lie about what actually took place at his studio. Again, those are allegations, but they are of some interest, and they're of more interest to me than ever before. Now you may have recently seen me promoting this book, Chaos. I'll show it to you here. Just so you guys know, this was just sent to me on my birthday this year by my friends, and I had no idea what I was getting into. Honestly, you guys, my my brain is melted. I don't I don't know what is what in American society, but I do know that the people in our government are, in fact, evil. It is called chaos, and the subheading is Charles Manson, the CIA and the Secret History of the Sixties. It was written by Tom O'Neil, and I'm gonna very briefly tell you how the story sets up because it's impressive. You get this guy. He's about to turn 40 years old, and his editor comes at him. He's a writer for Premiere Magazine in Los Angeles or in Hollywood. And he says, hey. It's gonna be the 30 year anniversary of the Manson murders, which forever changed Hollywood. Notoriously, it was believed that it ended the hippies era. The the murders were so brutal and so disgusting and so jarring and so shocking that all of those hippie communes that were all over and everyone wanted to drop out of college and become a hippie automatically ended. People were suddenly buying locks and saying, okay, no, actually, we can't live freely. It's not about love and rock and roll. We we need to protect our families. Nobody was experimenting with LSD anymore. And so he gets this, this assignment from his editor, and Tom O'Neil is like, come on. It's been 30 years. What what am I gonna tap into here that hasn't already been said? He starts making some calls, and he's kind of struck by the fact that people seem almost scared to talk to him. I'm going to tell you that you will not be able to put this book down. Chaos is exactly what it is. He ends up realizing that everything the public learned about those murders was a lie. He ends up discovering that the CIA was involved. He ends up discovering that the CIA knew Charles Manson. He ends up discovering that Charles Manson himself was a fed. Charles Manson was experimenting on behalf of the government with LSD, intentionally drugging people, that our government was obsessed with how to create mind how how to control a mind, rather. How to create a mass psychosis. And they were conducting all sorts of illicit experiments on the American people, drugging people, drugging people that worked at the CIA. This also brings us to MK Ultra. We have discussed this before, you know, the idea that the government is involved in drugging people in an effort to control them. They say m MK Ultra ended. He talks all about MK Ultra. Well, do you think it's ended? Me? No. I don't. Not after the things that Ye told me. Not after reading the text messages that were sent to him from his who he says is was his quote unquote handler, you know, threatening to drug him and send him back to la la land, telling him he'll never see his kids again. What happened to Britney Spears? You know, I think as a nation, we have to be able to confront the fact that there is truly evil, that demons are real. We cannot there is no way we can arm ourselves against this sort of an evil if we're not even able to acknowledge it. Because it is scary. I'm telling you, when I was reading this book, I haven't I don't think I read a book that quickly since the last Harry Potter came out. But I was just I was chilled by not realizing how much evil our government has committed in the past. Then I felt certain of the fact that this spiritual draw that I was feeling, which I would say really, really wanting to lean into my faith, That journey kind of began for me for the last year and a half. I knew that this was the way this is the only way. We cannot fight demons unless we are willing to acknowledge that they are demons. So I beg of you, get your hands on this book. Read it, confront it, and do not read it and walk away from it saddened or feeling like, oh, my gosh. What are we gonna do? What what if this our government really is this evil? Walk away from it being assured that we already know how this book ends. In the end, goodness wins. That's the truth. In the end, god wins.

@Ultrafrog17 - Green Lives Matter

Watch this therapist scene from the movie Get Out and tell me that this isn't a blatant exposure of MK Ultra. It has everything we have been talking about here and more. If you look close enough, you'll see that Hollywood is telling you the truth in plain sight. End of Thread

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asks Chris where his mom is, and he explains she's not home from work. Chris admits he didn't call anyone when he realized she was missing because he was scared. He feels paralyzed and sinks into a sunken place, reflecting on doing nothing in the past.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tell me when you're found. Come here, Chris. Look at me. Found it. Where is your mom? She, she was coming home, and she wasn't home. From work? Mhmm. And what do you do? Nothing. I just sat there. You didn't call anyone? No. Why not? I don't know. I just thought that if I did, make it real. You're so scared. You think it was your fault? How do you feel now? I can't move. You can't move. Why can't I move? You're paralyzed. Just like that date when you did nothing, you did nothing. Now sink into the floor. Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. Now you're in the sunken place.
iluminatibot
Posted - October 3, 2024 at 11:12 PM
Saved - October 4, 2024 at 4:03 AM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

Name one reason why JFK was murdered

Uncommonsince76
Posted - October 7, 2024 at 3:06 AM
Saved - October 7, 2024 at 9:53 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explored the narrative surrounding Lee Harvey Oswald and the assassination of JFK, arguing that Oswald was a scapegoat rather than a mastermind. I examined connections between Oswald, Jack Ruby, and various figures tied to Israeli interests, suggesting that the motives for Kennedy's assassination were linked to his opposition to Israel's nuclear ambitions. I highlighted the roles of key players, including Jim Garrison and the media's portrayal of events, while questioning the credibility of various narratives and emphasizing the need to scrutinize the evidence for deeper truths.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

When Lee Harvey Oswald was asked if he killed JFK, he simply said. “No sir, I’m just a patsy.” Oswald was telling the truth. The forces behind Kennedys death, are the same forces leading us to war with Iran right now… Let’s expose them. 🔎 👀 🧵 1/25

Video Transcript AI Summary
An individual requests legal representation, stating police have denied it. He claims ignorance of the situation and identifies himself as a Black man who works in the building where the incident occurred. He says he was taken in due to living in Missouri.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Please. I like some legal representation. The police officers have not allowed me to to have any. Go ahead. I, I don't know what this is all about. I'm just a black guy. What do I do to keep the I'm just a black guy. Sir? Shoot I work in that building. Were you in the building at the time? Naturally, if I work in that building, yes, sir. Back up, man. Come on, president. No. They've taken me in because of the fact that I live in Missouri. What time do you think of that? I'm just a party. President.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Oswald was the perfect patsy, but he was not some sort of mastermind that worked with and did counter intel work for the CIA. It seems laughable when you actually examine and listen to people who knew him. He was like many young Americans today, a young Marxist. He often spoke out for Cuban rights and even led an organization to raise awareness of what he perceived as the unjust treatment of Cuba by the US government. He even did multiple local radio interviews a few months before the Kennedy assassination. If he was a secret CIA operative, he was doing a poor job of laying low. It is true he lived in Russia when in college, and brought back a Russian wife. Many of his former professors and friends from Russia have stated they think it’s impossible that he killed Kennedy. His brief Russian 🇷🇺 background and Marxist views were selected because they made him easy to blame, not because he was “working for the Russians.” 🧵 2/25

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states they are not a communist, but confirms they are a Marxist. When asked to clarify the difference, Speaker 0 explains that several parties and countries are based on Marxism, such as Ghana and Great Britain, which has socialized medicine. These countries differ from outright communist countries, as they adhere to leftist or Marxist principles. Speaker 0 states that in their work with the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, they advocate for the restoration of diplomatic, trade, and tourist relations with Cuba.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No, sir. I am not a communist, and, I think that the, the, red herring and so forth is rather, ridiculous to toss into this conversation. And are you a Marxist? Well, I have studied Marxist philosophy. Yes, sir. And also other philosophers. Speaker 1: But are you a Marxist? I think you did admit on an earlier radio interview that you that you consider yourself a Marxist. Speaker 0: I would very definitely say that I, I, am a Marxist. That is correct. But that that does not mean, however, I'm a a communist. Speaker 1: What is the difference between the 2? Speaker 0: Well, there's a great deal of difference. Several, American parties in several countries are based on Marxism such as Ghana, Ghana. Certain countries have a characteristic of a socialist system such as Great Britain with its socialized medicine. These then are the differences between an outright communist country and countries which adhere to leftist or Marxist, principles. Speaker 1: In your work with the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, Speaker 0: what are you advocating? We advocate restoration of diplomatic trade and tourist relations with Cuba.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker was born in New Orleans in 1939, lived in Texas and New York during childhood, and attended Beauregard Junior High School and Warren Eastern High School. In 1956, he joined the United States Marine Corps, served for three years, and was honorably discharged as a buck sergeant. He then returned to work in Texas before moving back to New Orleans with his family. He became aware of Cuba around 1960, concurrent with the Cuban revolution. He believes American policy pushed Cuba into the Soviet Bloc and that a different approach could have prevented the current issues with Cuba. He contends that the actions of covert agencies like the CIA and its now-deceased leadership, such as Allen Dulles, contributed to the problem. He feels that a more humanitarian approach would have fostered friendlier relations with Cuba.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Either stolen or grown in one area and then taken to another area and sold, covertly undercover. No such no such system exist in Russia. Mister Osmel, Speaker 1: I'm curious about your personal background. If you could tell us something about, where you came from, your education, and, your your career to date, we'd be interested. Speaker 0: I'd be very happy to. I was born in New Orleans in 1939. For a short length of time during my childhood, I lived in Texas and in New York. During my junior high school days, I attended Beauregard Junior High School. I attended that school for 2 years. Then I went to Warren Eastern High School, and I attended that, school for over a year. Then my family and I moved to Texas, where we have many relatives, and, I continued my schooling there. Then I entered the United States Marine Corps in 1956. I spent 3 years in the United States Marine Corps starting out as a private, working my way up through the ranks, to the position of buck sergeant, and, I served honorably having been discharged. Then I went back to work in the Texas and have recently arrived in New Orleans to with my family, with my wife and my child. Speaker 1: What particular event in your life, made you decide that the the Fair Play for Cuba committee had the correct answers about the about Cuban US relations? Speaker 0: Well, of course, Americans in general have only begun to notice Cuba since the Cuban revolution. That is very true, I think. I became acquainted with it at about same time as everybody else in 1960 beginning in 1960. I always felt that the Cubans were being pushed into this, to the Soviet Bloc by American policy. I still feel that way. Our policy, if it had been handled differently and many others, much, more informed than I have said the same thing, if that situation had been handled differently, we would not have the big problem of Castor's Cuba now, the big international political, problem. Although I feel that, it's a it's a a just and a a right, development in Cuba, still we could be on much friendlier relations with them and had the government of the United States, its government agencies, particularly, certain covert, covert undercover agencies like the, now defunct c CIA. And that's Well, its leadership is now defunct. Allen Dulles is now defunct. That, I believe that, without all that meddling, with a little bit different, humanitarian handling of the situation, Cuba would not be the problem it is today.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Markova states Oswald taught dance and met Marina Prusakova at a dance event, marrying her six weeks later. Inessa Yakhliel, a close acquaintance, disputes claims of Oswald being a psychopath or threatening, describing him as a family person. Documents suggest Oswald held contradictory views on the U.S. and the Soviet Union. Yakhliel recalls Oswald speaking highly of President Kennedy, calling him the only sensible president. Despite the Warren Commission concluding Oswald acted alone, Shishkevich, Markova, and Yakhliel believe in a conspiracy. Shishkevich believes Oswald was a "passive, calm, compliant boy" used as a scapegoat. Markova believes Oswald was framed, while Yakhliel and other friends in the Soviet Union do not believe he committed the assassination. Those who knew him found the idea unbelievable.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Like he had crossed some line. Speaker 1: Markova says Oswald taught language students to dance the twist, and he sometimes went dancing at the Palace of Culture of Trade Unions. It was at one of these events that he met Marina Prusakova. Just 6 weeks later in the spring of 1961, Oswald married Marina. Within a year, his wife gave birth to their daughter, June. Inessa Yakhliel says she was close with the couple. Speaker 2: Whatever they write about him now, that he was a psychopath, a hot tempered or threatening person, absolutely none of that is true. I knew him as an absolutely different person, a family person. I liked him. I don't agree with anything that has been written about him. Speaker 1: Documents written by Oswald and discovered after the assassination give the impression that he had contradictory views regarding the United States and the Soviet Union, sometimes praising the countries, at other times condemning them. Yahlai El remembers hearing Oswald, who used the name Alek, speaking highly of president Kennedy. Speaker 2: One day, he was at our house, and the television was showing a meeting between Khrushchev and Kennedy. You may remember that meeting. I don't remember what year it was exactly. And he spoke about Kennedy very sympathetically. He said he was the only sensible president. Those were his words. Speaker 1: The presidential commission led by US chief justice Earl Warren concluded Oswald acted alone in killing the president. But Shishkevich, Markova, and Yahya El can't accept that conclusion, believing there must have been some form of conspiracy. Speaker 3: It is my absolute conviction that they found a passive, calm, compliant boy and used him as the guilty one and then they washed their hands of it. As for the conclusions of the Warren Commission, I don't believe them one bit. I have studied them and I don't think it was the work of my student. Speaker 0: I didn't believe he could have done it. It seemed to me that he was framed using the whole situation with the Soviet Union. I didn't think he could have done it, or he would have been completely insane to do it. Speaker 2: None of us. None of his friends here believed it. Some knew him a lot less than I did. Actually, they knew Marina more than Alec. But I came to know him well. I don't believe it. Speaker 1: Lee Harvey Oswald appeared to be a different man in different places with different people. He showed the world many faces, but the face the world saw in Dallas will be forever associated with the

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Many people have spent agonizing amounts of time examining Oswald and his origins, relationships, political views etc, but unfortunately you are focusing on the wrong person. Oswald was a patsy through and through, but there was a hiccup in the operation. Oswald was not supposed to survive. Whoever had Kennedy killed also had to have Oswald Killed. Why? Because Oswald would have beat the charges with the flimsy case, and it could have also led back to who actually killed Kennedy. Who’s the clean up crew? Jewish ✡️ man Jack Rubenstein. He shot Oswald on live tv 📺2 days later when Oswald was being Transferred from City to County Jail. 🧵 3/25

Video Transcript AI Summary
Captain Fritz reports that Lee has been shot multiple times. There is a man with a gun. Absolute panic is occurring in the basement of Dallas police headquarters. Detectives have drawn their guns. Oswald has been shot at point blank range in the stomach. He is shot.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Captain Fritz. There is a. There is Lee He's been shot. He's been shot. He's been shot. He's been shot. He's been shot. There's a man with a gun. Absolute panic. Absolute panic here in the basement of Dallas police headquarters. Detectives have their guns drawn. There is no question about it. Oswald has been shot at point blank range fired into his stomach. He is shot. He is shot. Oswald

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

You may be thinking, why is it important to point out that Jack Ruby was Jewish? What’s his ethnicity have to do with the JFK hit job. The answer is that it is actually critically important. When discussing the Kennedy assassination you undoubtedly will hear 3 standard theories. 1. It was Oswald and the Warren report was right. 2. It was the CIA so the US could get into more wars. 3. It’s the Freemasons/Illumanati and or mafia. All of these have different aspects that can lead people into believing them, but in the end they are not complete. We are going to view the JFK assassination from an Israeli Mossad angle. Once you survey all the evidence, you will see this makes the most sense. But why would Israel or Jewish Americans want Kennedy dead? ☠️ It’s simple really. Israel wanted nuclear weapons, and Kennedy wasn’t having it. I’ve attached letters between Kennedy and the Prime ministers of Israel to show the back and forth. 🧵 4/25

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

If that sounds crazy to you, dig a little deeper. As soon as Lyndon Johnson came to power, he looked the other way on Israel’s nuclear ambitions. Further he looked the other way when Israel attacked the USS liberty. 🚢 Yes Israel actually attacked one of our aircraft carriers as a way to draw us into war with Egypt. Johnson covered it up. Israel claimed it was a case of mistaken identity. 🧵 5/25

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Let’s give credit where credit is due. The first person to document and specifically point to a Mossad/israeli/Jewish connection in the JFK conspiracy, was Michael Collins Piper. He wrote about it in his book JFK, Final Judgment, but also discussed it on his radio program. There will be many clips from him throughout this thread. His discussion of the facts is tremendous. “As soon as I published my book, I was attacked from all angles, and specifically from people who had done JFK research. They didn’t read my book, and treated it as though I was suggesting some Hasidic rabbis shot JFK. What I am suggesting is that pro Israeli elements in the CIA, the Mob, and the Mossad were working together for Israeli interests.” -Michael Collin’s Piper 🧵 6/25

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker concludes that the Israeli Mossad was involved in John F. Kennedy's assassination because Kennedy tried to stop Israel from building nuclear weapons. The speaker claims that when they first presented this proposition, they were fiercely attacked by JFK assassination researchers who hadn't read their book. The speaker states that people misrepresented their argument as claiming that Israelis directly assassinated Kennedy in Dealey Plaza. The speaker clarifies that their actual suggestion was that pro-Israel elements in the CIA, connected to pro-Israel elements of organized crime and in the Mossad, were involved. Despite this clarification, the speaker says people preferred to attack them rather than pay attention to what they wrote.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Same conclusion and that is that the Israeli Mossad was involved in the assassination of John F. Kennedy precisely because John F. Kennedy had tried to stop Israel from building nuclear weapons. And of course, when I first came out with this proposition, I was fiercely attacked by a lot of people who had been involved in JFK assassination research. They never read my book. And when they talked about my book, they presented it as though I was saying that a bunch of Hasidic rabbis or a bunch of Israelis had set up shop in Dealey Plaza and blown head off President Kennedy when in fact that couldn't be anything close to the truth. But needless to say, this is what people believe that I was suggesting when in fact what I was suggesting was that there were pro Israel elements in the CIA connected to pro Israel elements of organized crime and in the Mossad who were involved in the Kennedy assassination. But despite having said that, people didn't pay attention to what I wrote. They preferred to attack me. Now Bob?

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Let’s return our focus to Jack Ruby, because he is the key. When you focus on him, all the connections flow vividly. The standard story you will hear with Jack Ruby is that he was a low level person in the mafia, and just killed Oswald because of his love for Kennedy. Keep in mind, he didn’t go see Kennedy the day he was riding through Dallas, so this theory that he loves Kennedy is out of left field. But further, stop thinking of the Mafia as only Italians. Our Jewish controlled media wants you to think that, and it has mostly worked, but the Mob was mostly Jewish. Jack Ruby did have Jewish mob connections to both Meyer Lansky and Hyman Larner in Chicago, Both ✡️ Jewish mobsters with Lansky being the head of the operation. Further, the night before the Kennedy assassination, the FBI recorded that Ruby and Lawrence Meyers were together. Lawrence Meyers was another Jewish ✡️ mobster. Here’s where it gets really wild. Where was Ruby the day of the JFK assassination? He stated he was working as a translator for Israeli Newspapers 🗞️. Whether he was or wasn’t, he knew they would cover for him. Why was Ruby in Texas in the first place? It appears that he moved down there to help smuggle airplane parts out of TX to Israel… 🧵 7/25

Video Transcript AI Summary
Michael Collins Piper discusses a possible Israeli connection to the JFK assassination, prompted by a caller named Bob. Bob noted Jack Ruby's claim that he was translating for Israeli newspapers the day of the assassination, suggesting Ruby expected corroboration from Israeli reporters present. Piper says the identities of these reporters were never adequately investigated. Piper claims Ruby wasn't Mafia, but part of Meyer Lansky's Jewish crime syndicate, with Hyman Larner as the real Chicago mob boss. FBI documents allegedly show Ruby traveled to Israel in 1955, stating he was going to Florida to buy contraband for Israel. The night before the assassination, Ruby met Lawrence Myers, a salesman for a firm linked to a corporation investigated for illegal arms shipments to Israel. Piper also claims Ruby was connected to the Bronzmann family, according to Al Lazanis.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: All right, ladies and gentlemen, welcome back. This is Michael Collins Pfeiffer coming to you from Washington, DC. And in simulated or instigated or whatever by a caller here, Bob from Texas, who is interested in the Israeli connection to the JFK assassination. I've decided we're going to talk about that. I'm going to keep Bob on here. We're going to chat about that for as long as Bob is interested. He brought up Jack Ruby and he brought up a very little known point about Jack Ruby and that is that Ruby claimed the night of the Kennedy assassination when he was horning in on a news conference with the Dallas police that he was working as a translator for Israeli newspapers. And Bob made the very interesting observation that Ruby undoubtedly made that or he probably made that statement confident that he would be backed up by the Israeli reporters who were indeed on the scene. And what's interesting about that folks is that, as I pointed out, the question about who those Israeli reporters were was never adequately addressed by any of the more vaunted JFK researchers who attend these annual conferences to hash out the issues that really don't matter. But in any case, everything but finding out who really did kill JFK and why. But I'll tell you what folks, I'd like to Bob had raised another interesting name connected to Israel involving the JFK assassination. Before we go to that Bob, I'd like to throw out a few more things about Jack Ruby here. Now, of course, everybody thinks Jack Ruby was tied up with the mafia and they say that, oh, he worked for Al Capone back in Chicago. Well, there's a little bit more to that than what has been presented in the mass media. Jack Ruby was not mafia. He was part of the Jewish crime syndicate of Meyer Lansky and Meyer Lansky's longtime Chicago partner whose name was Hyman Larner. Hyman Larner was the real boss of organized crime in Chicago. The big shot mafia boys that ran around in their fancy suits were mere window dressing for Hyman Larner, who was running the mob for many years from behind the scenes. And tell you something else too, FBI documents that revealed that Jack Ruby traveled to Israel in 1955 and told people after I leave here, I'm going to Florida to buy a load of contraband to send to Israel. Now even something further, the night before the JFK assassination and this has been written about time and time again in all the books that say the mafia killed Kennedy or even a lot of the books that just talk about the Kennedy assassination in general, they point out that the night before the JFK assassination, Ruby met with a longtime friend from Chicago named Lawrence Myers. Well, here's what's interesting about that. Everybody says, oh, well, Lawrence Myers was probably hooked up with organized crime or had mob connections. Well, if he had mob connections, they were Jewish mob connections. But what is not pointed out very widely, but what's which can be documented is that this guy Lawrence Myers was a salesman at a firm linked to a corporation that had been investigated for illegal arms shipments to Israel. So again, the night before the Kennedy assassination, Jack Ruby is talking Jack Ruby is meeting up with a friend from Chicago, who's linked to circumstances surrounding illegal arms shipments to Israel. Then the day of the assassination, he's there claiming to be a translator for Israeli newspapers. And you know, it even goes back further. Jack Ruby was hooked up with the Bronzmann's family. This is something that comes from Al Lazanis, who was a
Video Transcript AI Summary
According to William Pepper, Raul, allegedly James Earl Ray's handler in the Martin Luther King assassination, was connected to Jack Ruby in 1963 through an arms smuggling network linked to a top Israeli Mossad official. Information suggests Jack Ruby's move to Texas in 1948 was not for Chicago mafia work. Instead, he was allegedly involved in smuggling aircraft parts stolen from U.S. military installations to Israel, leveraging his background as an aircraft mechanic. Texas was reportedly a major hub for arms smuggling.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Bill, we can connect him by his own claims to Israeli newspapers, and I'll tell you what's even more interesting, folks, and I'm gonna come back to you in a minute, Bob. Another interesting detail about Jack Ruby is that according to doctor William Pepper, who has been investigating the Martin Luther King assassination in his book, I think the title of it was An Active State. I might be incorrect in that doctor Pepper investigating the Martin Luther King assassination found that the infamous character named Raul, who may have been the handler, who probably was the handler, the intelligence community handler for James Earl Ray, who was the patsy in the JFK asset or the Martin Luther King assassination, Raul was connected to Jack Ruby back in 1963 in an arm smuggling network that was linked to a top Israeli Mossad intelligence official. And according to some very interesting information that's come to my attention in which I have passingly referenced in final judgment, it strongly appears that Jack Ruby's real reason for going to Texas in 1948 was not to do work on behalf of the Chicago mafia. That's a lot load of bull folks. His real reason for going to Texas was because he was involved in a network that was smuggling aircraft parts out of Texas and Jack Ruby had been an aircraft mechanic when he was in the military in World War II. Jack Ruby knew about aircraft parts. Texas was a major base for the smuggling of aircraft parts stolen from U. S. Military installations to Israel. That was what was going on in Texas. In fact, Texas was a major site of smuggling arms

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Want to know an interesting coincidence? Yitzhak Rabin, who would later became a prime minister of Israel, was in Dallas the day before, and after the Kennedy Assassination. Not long after the assassination, he was promoted to Chief of Staff in the IDF. We only know he was in Dallas that day because his wife wrote about it in her memoirs… 🧵 8/25

Video Transcript AI Summary
Yitzhak Rabin, who was promptly promoted to head the Israeli military forces, was in Dallas the day of the JFK assassination, and at least the day before. The speaker poses the question of coincidence or conspiracy. People who discuss those in or near Dallas linked to the mafia, KKK, or CIA, never mention that the man who promptly became head of the Israeli Defense Forces was in Dallas the day President Kennedy, who was trying to stop Israel from building a nuclear arsenal, was assassinated. Jack Ruby, tied to the Israeli Mossad and Israeli arms dealing, happened to be the one who killed the patsy in the JFK assassination.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Devastating it would be if something serious had happened to him. Just as we walked into the door of our home, I picked up the phone to hear the shocking news, John F. Kennedy was dead. To have just returned from the United States and for Yitzhak to have been in Dallas just hours before, albeit as mere coincidence, Fort Bliss was just a stop on his military briefing tour was disorienting. Did that come across? It it Speaker 1: came across to me. Well, would you paraphrase it then to make sure it came out? Yitzhak Rabin, who was very promptly promoted to head the Israeli military forces was in Dallas the day of the JFK assassination and obviously at least the day before that too. So as I pose the question in final judgment, is that coincidence or conspiracy? It's something that people, you know To me, it's something that not many Americans know. Well, that's right. You see, the thing is all these people who go on and on about certain people who were in Dallas or may have been near Dallas the day of the JFK assassination who were linked to the mafia or the Ku Klux Klan or the CIA never mentioned the fact that the man who promptly got promoted to head the Israeli Defense Forces was in Dallas the day of the JFK assassination, the day that the American President, who was trying to stop Israel from building a nuclear arsenal was assassinated, followed a couple days later by someone named Jack Ruby who was tied up with the Israeli Mossad, who was tied up with Israeli arms dealing, just happened to be the guy who killed the Patsy in the JFK assassination. Speaker 0: Isn't that interesting? It's
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes Israel's Mossad was involved in Kennedy's assassination. Oswald was supposed to die, with the focus shifting to Russia, but Jack Ruby intervened. The speaker asserts this was a false flag operation, now perfected. Oswald's death was necessary to prevent a trial, leading to conjecture, similar to 9/11. The absence of a trial was by design, explaining why Oswald died on national TV.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Privately come to the conclusion that Israel's Mossad was involved in Kennedy's assassination. So Michael. Yeah. You know why? One thing we know for sure is Oswald was supposed to die in that plot. Okay? That was his fate. We were supposed to only see his wife. Okay? Mhmm. We we all the focus was supposed to be on Russia. That's right. But because because there was a problem, Jack Ruby had to come out of the shadows. You know? You know something? I think you're absolutely right. I know I'm right. I think you put your finger on something that It was a false flag operation. And we see how they work. But see, they've had time to perfect it now. And one of the reasons that Oswald had to die, there was never supposed to be a trial and we've never had a trial. And because we've never had a trial, we've only had conjecture. And the same things happened with 911. We've never had a trial. Okay? And once you don't have a trial, it just goes down into the annals of conspiracy. Mhmm. Mhmm. But it was we didn't have a trial by design. No. That's right. That's why that's why Oswald died on national TV. Bob, listen.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Just how many Israeli/Mossad connections can you make with important figures surrounding the Kennedy assassination? Almost all of them. Frank Sturgis is a well known mercenary, who you may know as someone who was part of the watergate scandal (yeah they were involved in that to) and has been implicated in the JFK conspiracy by multiple witnesses. Further, most say he has ties to the CIA, but if you trace his history, it’s more pronounced that he has ties to the Mossad. Further, the only man charged with conspiracy to murder JFK was Clay Shaw. How was Clay Shaw tied into Israel/Mossad? A company called Permindex. Now in the Oliver Stone movie 🎥 JFK, Permindex is mentioned as a CIA front, but this incorrect. It is most likely a Mossad money laundering operation, initially financed by Jewish man ✡️ Rabbi Tibor Rosenbaum. Rosenbaum was instrumental in helping the new state of Israel with security and worked for the Mossad directly. Further Rosenbaum’s main bank is connected to Jewish mobster Meyer Lansky.🇮🇱 Further, Clay Shaw was on the board of this Mossad Company Permindex. 🧵 9/25

Video Transcript AI Summary
According to the speaker, Jack Ruby had connections to Israeli newspapers. Dr. William Pepper, who investigated Martin Luther King's assassination, found that Raul, allegedly James Earl Ray's handler, was connected to Ruby in 1963 through an arm smuggling network linked to a top Israeli Mossad official. The speaker claims Ruby's move to Texas in 1948 was not for the Chicago mafia. Instead, he was involved in smuggling aircraft parts stolen from U.S. military installations to Israel, leveraging his experience as an aircraft mechanic during World War II. The speaker asserts that Texas was a major site for smuggling arms.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Bill, we can connect him by his own claims to Israeli newspapers, and I'll tell you what's even more interesting, folks, and I'm gonna come back to you in a minute, Bob. Another interesting detail about Jack Ruby is that according to doctor William Pepper, who has been investigating the Martin Luther King assassination in his book, I think the title of it was An Active State. I might be incorrect in that Doctor. Pepper investigating the Martin Luther King assassination found that the infamous character named Raul, who may have been the handler, who probably was the handler, the intelligence community handler for James Earl Ray, who was the patsy in the JFK asset or the Martin Luther King assassination, Raul was connected to Jack Ruby back in 1963 in an arm smuggling network that was linked to a top Israeli Mossad intelligence official. And according to some very interesting information that's come to my attention in which I have passingly referenced in final judgment, it strongly appears that Jack Ruby's real reason for going to Texas in 1948 was not to do work on behalf of the Chicago mafia. That's a lot load of bull folks. His real reason for going to Texas was because he was involved in a network that was smuggling aircraft parts out of Texas and Jack Ruby had been an aircraft mechanic when he was in the military in World War II. Jack Ruby knew about aircraft parts. Texas was a major base for the smuggling of aircraft parts stolen from U. S. Military installations to Israel. That was what was going on in Texas. In fact, Texas was a major site of smuggling arms

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

But that’s not all. The family that funded Clay Shaw’s defense was a wealthy ✡️ Jewish Family known as the Stern Family. The stern family had ties to Tibor Rosenbaum, but more specifically they were investors in the Apollo Nuclear plant. ☢️ This specific plant was investigated for losing highly enriched uranium, for suspicion that it had gone to Israel. 🧵10/25

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

If you haven’t seen the movie, JFK, you may not be familiar with Jim Garrison or Clay Shaw, so it’s worth diving deeper. Jim Garrison was a patriot, and truly was working to try to uncover the truth on JFK. Unfortunately he never put the entire puzzle together, but he did uncover key clues we can still use today. He was the district attorney of New Orleans and was the first person to bring charges against someone for a conspiracy to murder JFK. That someone was Clay Shaw. Jim Garrison also wrote a book which ended up being the main storyline for Oliver Stones film JFK. That book is On the Trail of the Assassins. Now clearly looking back his theory was wrong because they were missing the Israeli element. We will discuss possibly why in a later point. In the meantime what happened with his case against Clay Shaw? It was mostly a failure, because his main witness was not credible and all over the place, but also because he didn’t understand the Israeli connection. The witness that was all over the place was Perry Russo. 🧵 11/25

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Why was Perry Russo such an all over the place witness? Well let’s start with the fact that Clay Shaw wasn’t the only person that was indicted by Jim Garrison. He implicated both David Ferrie, Clay Shaw, and William Bannister. All of them had a history of anti communist, and anti Kennedy views. Now by the time Jim Garrison indicts them (February 1967), William Bannister had already died from a heart attack years before. (He died within 1 year of the Kennedy assassination.) You will notice many untimely deaths when you dig into the JFK assassination. This leaves Jim to indict both Clay Shaw and David Ferrie. 2 days after the indictment, David Ferrie dies of a “Brain Hemorrhage.” Just a coincidence I guess. 🤷 Now to me, this really exactly explains Jim Garrisons “Star Witness” Perry Russo better than anything else. He said he came forward after the death of his friend David Ferrie. Does that make sense to you? Or did he come forward to torpedo the case with false information so he wouldn’t be killed? That seems far more plausible to me. None of his information really checked out, and he contradicted himself often. Clay Shaw was found not guilty by the jury within 1 hour of Jury deliberation 🧵 12/25

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

To be fair to Garrisons case, I do think it was possible those men were involved in some way, however they were not the power brokers. They certainly weren’t working with Pro Cuban, and Pro Communist Oswald. We know they weren’t the power brokers, because they kept winding up dead…☠️ All except Clay Shaw, whose case might have actually helped the Israeli/Jewish Mobsters with his acquittal, and of course remember that the ✡️ Stern family funded his defense. Regardless of the failure of the court case, there is one unbelievable thing Garrison did for the public. He subpoenaed Time/Life magazine for the Zapruder film,🎥 making it available for the public for the first time. 🧵 13/25

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

The Official story on Abraham Zapruder is he just happened to be in the right place at the right time with some of the best Camera equipment to video tape the most important historical video of all time, and even though gun shots are ringing out, he’s not phased…. Not so fast. The parts they leave out is that Abraham Zapruder was a Ukrainian ✡️Jewish Freemason. He also had an office in the nearby Dal-Tex building where witnesses suggested some actual shots came from. This makes sense. Remember Oswald is the patsy, but further the Texas Book Depository building where they staged Oswald’s gun was also a distraction. Oswald worked in the building so it was perfect. The Dal-Tex Building also had connections to ✡️Marty Friedman, another Jewish garment manufacturer like Zapruder, and co owner of the building, ✡️ was Jewish man David Weissblatt, a big supporter of the ADL. Do you think that’s a coincidence? 🧵 14/25

Video Transcript AI Summary
Some believe a gunman may have fired from Abe Zapruder's office in the Dal-Tex building. Zapruder, a Jewish immigrant from Ukraine, was a partner of Mr. Friedman, who was involved in Iranian business and garment manufacturing. Zapruder's camera was loaded with the best Kodachrome 2 safety film and had a zoom lens. He was situated far back, almost at the fence, standing on a pedestal. While many had cameras that day, Zapruder was the only one on the side where the president was; all other pictures were from the opposite side. This is presented as an interesting detail.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Whole issue of Zapruder and what he knew or didn't know. So there are a lot of people who actually believe that he may have been not that he was one of the assassination plotters, but, I have heard it suggested that the that one of the gunmen may have actually been firing from Abe Zapruder's office in the Dow Tech's building because that's where he had his offices. And he was a partner of this Mr. Friedman, who was involved not only in the Iranian business, but also in garment manufacturing. They were business partners. Well, I Speaker 1: looked it up on Wikipedia. He was an immigrant from Ukraine. Okay? Mhmm. A Jewish immigrant. Yes. Okay. And apparently, his camera was loaded with the best Kodachrome 2 safety film that you could buy. Okay. In other words, it was very good film. Alright. Mhmm. It had a zoom lens on it. And if you if you look at where he was situated, he was not very close. He was pretty far back. Mhmm. Like, he was almost back back at the fence, and he was standing on a pedestal. And from what I read, there were a lot of people with cameras that day, but he was the only one on the side on the side where the president was. All of the other pictures were from the from the other side. Yeah. So I'm not all I'm saying is Isn't it interesting? It's interesting. Alright. I better hang up
Video Transcript AI Summary
Sam Blum, representing pro-Israel interests in Dallas, pressured officials to make Lee Harvey Oswald accessible to the press, enabling Jack Ruby to kill him. A search of Ruby's home revealed a slip of paper with Blum's contact information. Regarding the theory of a second shooter in the Dow Text building, it was co-owned by David Weisblatt, a major backer of the Anti-Defamation League. Offices connected to Morty Friedman, an attorney, garment manufacturer, and activist in Jewish Affairs, were also in the building. Friedman was a business partner of Abraham Zapruder, who filmed the JFK assassination. One of Friedman's firms in the building was a Dallas uranium and oil company, and uranium is used in Israel's nuclear weapons program.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They knew where Lee Harvey Oswald was going to be moved and at what time is. Well, here's what's very interesting. Originally, it was going to be kept secret from the media, but the same guy, Sam Blum, representing these powerful pro Israel interests in Dallas pressured the City Manager to in turn pressure the Dallas Police Chief into making Oswald accessible to the press and to move him publicly from the Dallas police station to the city jail. And that's why they were able to get Lee Harvey Oswald in a position where Jack Ruby could kill Oswald. And you know what's interesting, When the police searched Ruby's home, they found a slip of paper with Bloom's name, address and telephone number on it. Interesting. Yeah. Another little point too, a lot of people thought that one of the shots that there was one assassin who may have fired from the Dow Text building. Well, the Dow Text building was co owned by David Weisblatt and he was a major backer of the Anti Defamation League. But what's interesting is that in that Dow Tech's building on various floors, there were offices connected to a guy by the name of Morty Friedman. He was an attorney and a garment manufacturer and an activist in Jewish Affairs in Dallas. He was also a business partner of Abraham Zapruder, the guy who took the famous film of the JFK assassination. Well, now why this is interesting is that one of the firms in the Dow tax building that was linked to Mr. Friedman, it was a Dallas uranium and oil company. Well, now we do know that uranium is used in Israel's nuclear weapons program. That's just kind of an aside there. Yes, but it's kind of interesting. And you see the point is this, just as I originally ignored Lee Harvey Oswald, but did focus on Jack Ruby, I made the mistake of assuming that the things in Dallas were just kind of that they just took place and that the the the the

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

I’d like to posit a different theory about Zapruder. He knew exactly what was going to happen,along with when and where. He knew this because of his Jewish connections. His plan was to then sell this film for a large amount of money to Time/Life magazine, but his buddies in the Jewish controlled press would not release it anyway. Which is exactly what they did. Why did Time/Life pay 150k for a film they never used? Why did they sell it back the Zapruder family for 1 dollar? It doesn’t make sense if they are a for profit business… eventually the government paid the Zapruder family 16 million dollars for the film in 1999… I guess they did alright for themselves. This is why when Dan Rather describes the film in 1963, he describes it perfectly wrong to fit with the upcoming Warren Commission. They already know what needs to be said in order for it to match. He specifically says that Kennedys head flies forward because he was shot in the back of the head by Oswald. 🤥 🧵 15/25

Video Transcript AI Summary
The motion picture shows President Kennedy's assassination and the shooting of Texas Governor John Connally. The motorcade turned onto Elm Street, near the building where the assassin was positioned. About 35 yards from the building, Kennedy raised his hand to his face, and lurched forward, indicating he'd been hit. Mrs. Kennedy was looking away at that moment. Governor Connally turned toward Kennedy, seemingly asking what was wrong, when he was also struck by a bullet and fell to the side. His wife covered him protectively. Another bullet hit President Kennedy's head, causing it to jolt forward. Mrs. Kennedy stood up and then appeared to fling herself onto the trunk of the car. The car, with a Secret Service agent on the bumper and another with a telephone, sped away under an underpass. The three shots occurred within approximately five seconds. The FBI possesses this 20-second film taken by an amateur photographer.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just returned from seeing a complete motion picture of the moments preceding and the moments of president Kennedy's assassination and the shooting of Texas governor John Connally. Here is what the motion picture shows. The automobile, the black Lincoln convertible with the top down, carrying in the front seat, 2 Secret Service agents. In the middle or jump seat, governor and missus Connelly. And in the rear seat, president, and missus Kennedy made a turn off of Houston Street on the fringe of downtown Dallas onto Elm Street. This was a left turn and was made right in front of the building from which the assassin's bullet was fired. After making the turn and going about 35 yards from the corner of the building, 6 stories up in which the assassin had a window open. And keep in mind here that president Kennedy and governor Connally are seated on both on the same side of the car, on the side facing the building. Missus Kennedy and missus Connelly are on the side of the car away from the assassin. About 35 yards from the base of the building, President Kennedy, in the film, put his hand up to the right side of his face, the side facing the assassin. He seemingly wanted to brush back his hair or perhaps rub his eyebrow. Missus Kennedy, at this moment, was looking away or looking straight ahead. She was not looking at her husband. At that moment, when the president had his right hand up to this side of his face, He lurched just a bit forward. It was obvious that the first shot had hit him. Missus Kennedy was not looking at him and nor did she appear to know at that instant that her husband had been hit. Governor Connally in the seat immediately in front of the president apparently either heard the shot or sensed that something was wrong because governor Connolly with his coat open, his button was undone, turned in this manner, his hand outstretched back toward the president. And the governor had a look on his face that would indicate he perhaps was saying, what's wrong or what happened or can I help or something? But as governor Connolly was turned this way, his white shirt front exposed well to view of the assassin, The governor was obviously hit by a bullet, and he fell over to the side. Governor Connolly's wife immediately, seemingly instantaneously, placed herself over her husband in a protective, position, it appeared. And as governor Connolly fell back, governor president Kennedy was still leaned over at that moment. Another bullet obviously hit the head of the president. The president's head went forward violently in this manner. Missus Kennedy, at that instant, seemed to be looking right square at her husband. She stood up. The president slumped over to the side, and, I believe, brushed against missus Kennedy's dress. Missus Kennedy immediately turned and flung herself on the trunk of the automobile, face down on the trunk almost on all fours. The first lady appeared to be either frantically trying to get the secret service man who was riding on the bumper of the car, the single secret service man riding on that bumper, to come into the car or to to tell him what had happened. Or perhaps from the picture, it appeared she might have been trying to to get out of the car some way. The car never stopped. The secret service man on the front seat had a telephone in his hand. The car its acceleration increased rapidly, and it disappeared under an underpass. The 3 shots, the first one hitting the president, the second one hitting governor Connolly, and the third one hitting the president consume possibly 5 seconds, not much more than that of any. That is the scene shown in about 20 seconds of film that the FBI has in its possession. The film was taken by an amateur photographer who was in, a very advantageous

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

In this way, Garrison ruined the party. Once parts of the public started to see the Zapruder film, pressure was building that the warren commission was garbage. Now the Zapruder film wasn’t seen by the large swaths of the American public until 1975, but what does the Jewish media do when they present it to the public? They bring up Jewish ✡️ analyst to instruct them exactly how to think about it with the new evidence. In other words they are controlling the counter narrative to make sure it leads to the CIA. Jewish man ✡️ Geraldo Rivera is discussing the standard assassination theory along with the new CIA theory with another Jewish ✡️ man Ralph Schoenman. Further they have another discussion with Jewish man ✡️ Robert Groden. I’ve also attached a newer video of Robert Groden espousing essentially the same views he has held over decades. Now they have complete and total control of the standard narrative, and the counter narrative. And of course this is by design along with our Jewish controlled press. 🧵 16/25

Video Transcript AI Summary
Robert J. Groden, author and JFK assassination expert, discusses his 49 years of research into the topic, spurred by the event occurring on his 18th birthday. He has written books such as "High Treason" and "JFK Absolute Proof," and consulted on the House Select Committee on Assassinations and Oliver Stone's film "JFK." Groden claims the President was shot in a crossfire, hit by multiple shooters. He states that 88 eyewitnesses, including Dallas doctors he interviewed while working for the House Assassinations Committee, said the President was shot from the right front, conflicting with the official narrative of Lee Harvey Oswald shooting from behind. Groden is presenting an audio-visual presentation at the Medford Library, featuring previously unreleased material from his book, "JFK The Absolute Proof," made possible by the unenforceability of a prior non-disclosure agreement. Groden expresses doubt about a definitive answer to the assassination ever being reached due to the abundance of false evidence. He notes that the Warren Commission's working papers are withheld for a minimum of 75 years, potentially until 2039 or the death of the last Kennedy child. Groden also mentions being ticketed 83 times and jailed twice in Dallas for allegedly vending without a permit, despite permits being unnecessary.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To our 5 on 5, we're pleased to be joined by New York Times best selling author of High Treason, Robert j Groton. Robert, thanks for coming. I appreciate it. Speaker 1: Thank you. Speaker 0: So you are one of the world's foremost authorities on the John f Kennedy assassination. I wanna first ask you, what got you into the into the conspiracy theories or into the assassination? Speaker 1: President was shot on my 18th birthday, November 22, 1963. And I'd always been fascinated by questions of history. I just gravitated to this one immediately and I've been doing it now for 49 years. Speaker 0: What have you done? Obviously, High Treason, I assume, is a book about the assassination perhaps? Speaker 1: High Treason, the killing of a president, the search for Lee Harvey Oswald, the new one, JFK Absolute Proof, just constantly dealing with new things as they come out. I was Staff Photographic Consultant to the House Select Committee on Assassinations for 3 years, Oliver Stone's Chief Consultant on Speaker 0: the movie Speaker 1: JFK, and on and on like that. The Kennedy assassination has been my whole adult life from the time I was 18 years old until now. And, I have, lately been fighting a war against the city of Dallas in Texas for, the fact that they are trying to shut researchers up. They do not want there to be any mention of assassinations or conspiracy. So, it's something that I've been fighting for quite some time and shows no sign of going away. Speaker 0: What do you believe happened to the President that day? Speaker 1: The President was shot in a crossfire. He was hit by more than one shooter. Beyond that, we don't really know all that much, because so much false evidence has been put out there. What I do know is that when I worked for the House Assassinations Committee, I actually interviewed the Dallas doctors. And all in all, between the doctors and other eyewitnesses, we have 88 witnesses, 88, every one of which said the President was shot from the right front. Of course, the Texas School Board Depository, where Lee Harvey Oswald was supposed to be shooting from, was behind and to the right. So we do have a serious problem with the, legitimacy of the evidence itself. Speaker 0: And you're, participating in a forum here at the Medford Library tomorrow at 4 pm and also again at 7 pm on the 1st floor of the Medford Library, what are you going to be talking about? What are you going to be focusing on? Speaker 1: It's going to be an audio visual presentation. I'm going to present stuff from my new book, JFK The, Absolute Proof, stuff I have not released before because when I worked for the government I was under a non disclosure agreement which has just been ruled unenforceable. So, I can release some of that new stuff now. But the idea is to bring the issues of the assassination to life for the audience, that they can see for themselves what actually did happen and, we'll have questions and answers afterward, but anyone who is interested in learning about the assassination or the issues or seeing the history of it for themselves should come. It's free. There's no charge for it. That's fantastic. Yeah. Speaker 0: Very cool. Alright. We're going to take a quick break. We'll have much more in a moment. Stay with us. Welcome back to our 5 on 5. We're again talking to New York best New York Times best selling author Robert J. Groden, talking about the John F. Kennedy assassination. Do you think in your lifetime we'll have a definitive answer on this? Speaker 1: I used to think we definitely would. Now I tend to wonder about it. There's so much false evidence put out there on both sides of the issue that it gets more and more confusing. People who want to learn just get so confused, they just walk away from it sometimes. I have made it my point in life, my goal in life, to try to get the truth out there and keep it as straight as possible for whoever wants to know. Speaker 0: And the Warren Commission report has never been released, correct? And will that ever happen? Speaker 1: The Warren Commission report was released, but their files, their working papers like that have been withheld for a minimum of 75 years. That's 26 years from now. The reason why I worry about that and wonder about it is if Lee Harvey Oswald was a lone assassin as they tell us, what is there that could possibly be a matter of national security to hold this stuff up? The way the law is written now, this stuff would not be released until 75 years after the release of the Warren Report which was just September of 1964. And the thing is this, it's either that or until the death of the last remaining Kennedy child, whichever occurs last. So it's a minimum of 2,039. Speaker 0: Wow, incredible. Okay. And going back, I want to ask you again about Dallas. You say you've been arrested or cited how many times? Speaker 1: I have been ticketed 83 times total. Do you know why? Speaker 0: And I've been thrown Speaker 1: in jail twice. Speaker 0: What have they told you? Speaker 1: Well, that's just it. They keep making stuff up as they go along. The last time they threw me in jail for vending without a permit in an area under control of the Parks Department. Two problems. Permits don't exist. They're not necessary. The law says that you don't need them to do it. That's number one number.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion centers on the Zapruder film, an amateur film taken by Abraham Zapruder, a Dallas dress manufacturer, which captured the assassination of President Kennedy. The film is described as a valuable historical document. The footage shows the presidential motorcade moving through Dealey Plaza. As the car passes, the president is shot. According to the speaker, the Warren Commission claimed Lee Harvey Oswald, acting alone, fired all shots from behind. However, the film purportedly shows the president's head being thrown violently backwards, suggesting a shot from the front. The speaker claims this is consistent with witness accounts stating shots came from the grassy knoll in front of the president. The film also shows people running towards the area where the shots were believed to have originated.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The president's death, and he desperately wanted to understand how it could have happened. For 2 years, he, like most Americans, believed in the official version, the warrant commissioned version of what happened. But the day he first saw that 8 millimeters Zapruder film, that amateur film that was made, that was the day he stopped believing. Robert, welcome. And I wish you could set up the Zapruder film a bit for us, and we'll get right into it. Okay. Speaker 1: Abraham Zapruder was a Dallas dress manufacturer. And it was pure accident that he brought the camera with him that day. He almost didn't. And he was looking for a good vantage point, and he picked a point on Elm Street in Dilley Plaza in downtown Dallas. As the motorcade passed in front of him, he got what is frame for frame the most valuable historical document of all time. Speaker 0: It's become very chic among, television producers to, put a disclaimer at the head, of any film. The film you're about to see might be shocking. It might be horrifying. You might not want your your kids to watch it. And I think the, unfortunate net effect of that is to make more people watch it. Well, I'm telling you right straight out that if you are at all sensitive, if you're at all queasy, then don't watch this film. Just put on the, the late night movie, because this is very heavy. It's the film shot by the Dallas dress manufacturer, Abraham, Zapruta, and it's the execution of president Kennedy. And, Bob and Dick, would you please narrate what we're seeing as we show this film? Speaker 1: This is, this is commercial footage leading into Dealey Plaza. This is the car on Main Street. Speaker 0: So this film was taken by actual newsmen. This was spliced together with the Abraham Zapruder Speaker 1: film? Yes. Speaker 0: Alright. So this is the beginning of the motorcade. Speaker 1: What you're seeing now is in slow motion so that you can grasp what is happening. This is a film taken by Marie Muchmore that leads into the Zapruder film. It's for time continuity. The president is waving to Speaker 0: the crowd here. And Jacqueline Kennedy, of course, is sitting alongside him in the open car. Speaker 1: Right. This is from Marvel Nix's film. This this is originally 8 millimeter footage, and they're heading now toward Elm Street. They're on Houston Street now. They're gonna make a left hand turn. It's on the corner where they're gonna make the turn there that the book depository was. Now this is the Zapruder film. Speaker 0: Okay. So the cars are coming along now into Dealey Plaza? Yes. Speaker 1: These these are the lead motorcycles of the motorcade. Speaker 0: Alright. Now with the president and missus County is also governor Connelly. Right. Right. Speaker 1: Now before he goes behind the sign, the president is waving to the crowd. He comes out from behind the sign, he is shot, then Governor Connolly is shot. Speaker 0: He's already been hit. He's already been hit. Speaker 1: And now? At the bottom of the screen, the head shot. Speaker 0: That's the shot that blew off his head. It's the most horrifying thing I've ever seen in the movie. Speaker 1: Now the Warren Commission said that all of the shots were fired from behind by Lee Harvey Oswald, a lone assassin, firing at the president. And as you could see clearly, the head is thrown violently backwards. Can completely consistent with the shot from the front. Right. Now this is an extreme blow up of just the president from the film. Alright. Coming up behind the sign, he shot Speaker 0: He's hit from the sit here. From the front too. Speaker 1: From the front. Now Jackie doesn't realize what's happened yet. She goes to his aid. And now? He's hit again. The violent backward motion. Totally consistent with 80% of the witnesses, which said the shot came from the ground scene all in front and to the right. Speaker 0: It's interesting to note how many people is running towards where most folks thought the shots came from. Speaker 1: The head goes backwards in the next film, from the other side of the street. Speaker 0: Oh, god. That's awful. That's the most upsetting thing I've ever seen. We'll talk about it in a minute.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ralph Schoneman claims the Warren Commission's official version of the JFK assassination, which states Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone, is false. He alleges the Warren Commission's testimony and exhibits contradict the official report. Schoneman claims Lee Harvey Oswald was a CIA agent, referencing Secret Service report number 767 and a CIA number for Oswald, 110669. He notes 51 documents pertaining to CIA intelligence and Lee Harvey Oswald are sealed in the National Archives for 75 years. Schoneman states Jack Ruby's testimony contradicts the Warren Report's summation. He says Ruby stated he couldn't tell the truth in Dallas and wanted to be taken to Washington, fearing for his life. Schoneman references Ruby's doctor's report, published in the London Sunday Times, where Ruby claimed involvement in a plot to kill JFK and shot Oswald after a phone call from Fort Worth. Schoneman asserts the CIA is the common denominator linking figures involved in the assassination. He says he told this to Charles Olson, an investigator for the Rockefeller Commission. He quotes James Angleton's statement about "many rooms in the mansion" and not knowing "who struck John."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've been joined, as you can see, by a man named Ralph Schoneman. He's a writer and, historian who's been studying and investigating the president's assassination for 11 or 12 years now. Ralph, I I wish you could start by giving us the Warren Commission version, the official version, the version that so far has been written into the history books, about what happened. And then tell us your reasons for feeling that that was not the way it really happened. Speaker 1: Well, Geraldo, as you know, the official view is that Lee Harvey Oswald is the lone assassin and, fired all the fatal shots from behind. The film that you've just seen is the irreputable, you know, answer to that fiction. But beyond that, the actual testimony and the exhibits of the Warren Commission are one to one, contradiction to the official report. And that concerns all of the principles, Jack Ruby, all the people that they interrogate. Indeed, the, what we find is that the common theme uniting the people in Watergate and in the Bay of Pigs operation and in Dallas, the execution of John Kennedy is counterintelligence, the central intelligence agency. Speaker 0: The CIA. CIA. Alright. Now I'm gonna play the role of the the devil's advocate here and say that, we've heard all these conspiracy theories before. Be specific if you have an allegation to make and you have documentation to back it up. Speaker 1: For Speaker 0: instance, Lee Harvey Oswald, is generally known to have been a communist, slightly or massively, as it turns out, I guess, deranged. Do you have evidence saying that he wasn't a a communist? Speaker 1: Lee Harvey Oswald was a an agent of the Central Intelligence Agency. Prove it. He had been, at at Sugi Air Force Base in the Marines with high security clearance. Indeed, there is a secret service report which the Warren report chooses not to discuss, secret service report number 767, which, refers to Alan Sweat, chief criminal division of the sheriff's office in Dallas, who discusses the, FBI number of Lee Harvey Oswald S 172. And the document makes reference to a central intelligence agency number for Oswald number 110669. Now, leaving aside the matter of the authenticity of the information in the Secret Service report, What's important is that the Warren report chooses to ignore all of the relevant evidence concerning the CIA role of Oswald. There are 51 documents pertaining to CIA intelligence and Lee Harvey Oswald which are consigned to the National Archives not to be open for, 75 years as of the killing of John Kennedy. At the very least, that must be demanded by any investigating body and certainly the Rockefeller Commission, which is supposed to be investigating the domestic role of CIA, is to subpoena and demand those documents to be shown to the American people. Speaker 0: Jack Ruby is the restaurateur who killed Lee Harvey Oswald on national television. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: He said, according to the summation of the Warren Commission, that he acted solely because of grief, that this great man, John Kennedy, had been assassinated, and he sought to take revenge. Speaker 1: That's a very good example of how the Warren Report has totally fabricated the truth. The actual statements of Jack Ruby bear no relation to the Warren Report's summation of them. In volume 5 of the very exhibits, and documents of the Warren Commission, we find the verbatim testimony of Jack Ruby. And in that testimony, he states that he can't tell the truth in Dallas. He wants to be taken to Washington. He says you will never see me alive if you don't get me out of Dallas. Speaker 0: He says that to Speaker 1: Yes. He says that to chief justice Earl Warren and to, Gerald Ford and Leon Jaworski who were present Speaker 0: at the time. They were on the Warren Commission. Ford was a member Speaker 1: of the Warren Commission and Leon Jaworski was one of its counsels. Now in this discussion, Ruby at one point states you could say that Lee Harvey Oswald didn't shoot John Kennedy. Jack Ruby did. He says you'll never see me alive again if you don't get me to Dallas. That's verbatim testimony. Pages It starts pages 181, goes to 212, volume 5. And that's, not only the, testimony contained in the exhibits of the Warren report, but we have the testimony of the doctor of Jack Ruby who has disclosed the documents, that he had prepared about his, discussions and his, treatment of of Ruby and was published in the London Sunday Times this year. And these documents are a report of a series of confidential examinations carried out in on Ruby while he was in Dallas County Jail and Ruby states categorically that he was involved in a plot to kill John Kennedy. That he shot Oswald upon receiving the phone call from Fort Worth. And he says his last words to the doctor were, I did not I do not want to die, but I am not insane. I was afraid to kill Oswald. Speaker 0: Now Ruby, according again to official history, contracted a cold a cold while in prison. And approximately 24 hours later, he died the Of Speaker 1: lung cancer. Speaker 0: Of lung cancer. Right. Speaker 1: Rather an extraordinary, timing considering that he was just about to have a hearing in which, his sanity at the time of the murder of Oswald was to be assessed when Ruby would have had an opportunity in public court to advance his, his, views as he attempted to express them to the Warren Commission. Speaker 0: Your basic point is that the CIA is the common denominator linking all these people together. Speaker 1: Well, that's not a question of my point. That's what the FBI reports and the commission documents and exhibits Speaker 0: show. Have you told this to anyone? Speaker 1: Official power? For starters, I, told this to Charles Olson, an investigator for the Rockefeller Commission. Speaker 0: The commission investigating the CIA? Speaker 1: Yes. The official commission from which we do not expect great things, but we do intend to embarrass them with the facts and, of course, to present this data both, to congressional committees and across the United States, to college audiences and to the public as best we can. The Central Intelligence Agency, particularly counterintelligence, constantly appears in the lives of these disparate people. They're all connected to it. For example, when James Angleton resigned as head of Counterintelligence on Christmas Day, he made the rather extraordinary statement quoted in the New York Times on December 25th. Said there were many rooms in the mansion. I wasn't privy to who struck John. Well, I think we ought to know who he thinks was privy to who struck John. Speaker 0: Thank you. It's very unsettling. Thank you for being on the show. I might say just as an addendum that we

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

This is not the only example of controlled opposition, and intentional disinformation regarding the Kennedy shooting. Let’s go through some more. The most obvious one, is the Oliver Stone movie JFK. Oliver stone is Jewish. ✡️ His father’s original last name was Silverstein. Further the screenplay writer on the film was a Jewish ✡️ man named Zachary Skylar. The book written by Jim Garrison was published by a Jewish ✡️ publisher Sheridan Square, that had ties to Jewish ✡️ communist Irving Kristol. Irving Kristol is Bill Kristol father. Bill Kristol is one of the founders of the Jewish ✡️ neocon movement that led to the Iraq war. While i do think Jim Garrison was trying to do the right thing, I believe he couldn’t see past the gatekeeping and truly believed it was the CIA. 🧵 17/25

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

The worst part about the movie JFK 🎥, and I’m not making this up, is that the film producer was Arnon Milchen. Milchen was film producer and Israeli spy, 🕵️ and also has many implications in laundering weapons… But the JFK movie is not the only misinforming propaganda, take modern day Jewish ✡️ talk show Ben Shapiro. In his series “Debunked” he spends 5 minutes explaining why the Warren Commission and single bullet theory actually do make sense, and all the conspiracy theories are nonsense. His evidence for this is citing another author by the name of Gerald Posner. Posner has a Jewish ✡️ wife, and recently posted on his X account that we need a 2nd ADL type of organization. Posner may be Jewish himself, but I cannot confirm it. Anyway, his main JFK text, is a story of how when you get shot in the back of the head, the force can actually force your head to fly back like Kennedy’s. Total and complete nonsense. 🧵 18/25

Video Transcript AI Summary
The 1979 House Select Committee on Assassinations suggested JFK's death might have been the result of a conspiracy, but this relied on flawed acoustical data. Many believe a shooter was on the grassy knoll, but shots came from the Texas Book Depository. Police found Oswald's rifle, and physical evidence linked him to it. The Zapruder film was used by Jim Garrison to suggest a shooter in front of the motorcade due to JFK's head movement. However, physics explains the "recoil effect," where the exit force of the bullet propelled his head back and to the left. The "magic bullet" theory, where one bullet struck both JFK and Connolly, was seemingly replicated by the Discovery Channel. Despite claims of extraordinary marksmanship being needed, Oswald was a trained sharpshooter in the Marines, and the distance to JFK was relatively short. Oswald had motive: a troubled childhood, interest in Marxism, and disciplinary issues in the Marines.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The assassination of JFK has spawned an enormous number of conspiracy theories. Many rely on patently false information. Others are completely speculative. More life was given to these conspiracy theories, thanks to a report from the United States House Select Committee on Assassinations in 1979, which found that JFK might have been killed as the result of a conspiracy, rejecting the findings of the so called Warren Commission. That committee report relied on bad acoustical data in the Maine. They used a tape that suggested that more shots had been fired than just the 3 that Oswald fired. It actually was the echo of the shot that was appearing on the acoustical data. Nonetheless, today, only a small minority of Americans believe that Oswald acted alone. Speaker 1: Was there more than one assassin firing in Dealey Plaza? On Tuesday night, we will ask whether regardless of the actual number of gunmen, there was a conspiracy leading to the president's murder. Speaker 0: Let's begin with the most easily debunked claim. There are a lot of folks who believe that there was another shooter on the so called grassy knoll and that Kennedy was actually shot from the front from the grassy knoll. That's not true. The shots that hit Kennedy and Connolly were fired from behind from the Texas Book Depository. Depository. Police found the rifle belonging to Oswald, an Italian Carcano M91 38 bolt action rifle on the 6th floor of the depository. The rifle was present in prior photos of Oswald. He bought the rifle in March. Physical evidence, palm print, and coat fibers matched Oswald. The bullets recovered at the scene matched Oswald's gun. The assassination was famously captured by Abraham Zapruder. The film became the most famous film in American history. It lasted 26.6 seconds and was silent. Later, the film would feature an Oliver Stone's extraordinarily dishonest propaganda piece of JFK, particularly the famous back and to the left seat, which attorney Jim Garrison insists there must have been a shooter in front of the limousine because JFK's headshot throws him back and to the left. Speaker 2: It's totally inconsistent with the shot from the depository. Again, and to the left. Speaker 0: Physics explains just why JFK's head snapped in this direction. 1st, for a split second, JFK's head actually does launch forward. After the bullet exits JFK's head, his head snaps back. This is due to the so called recoil effect as explained by doctor Nicholas Nally, a senior research scientist at IMSG Inc. Author Gerald Posner says, quote, it's almost a jet effect. As that propels out his head, it has much more force than the force of the bullet moving in, and it shoots him in the opposite direction. It shoots out to the right, front, and left violently. Then there is the question of the so called magic bullet, the bullet that struck JFK and then traveled through governor Connolly. In 2004, the Discovery Channel aired an episode of unsolved history in which they attempted to duplicate the shot, and they found that the bullet traveled precisely the same path suggested by the single bullet theory. What about the theory that Oswald could not have shot JFK because it would have taken an extraordinary feat of marksmanship to get off 3 shots in the amount of time allotted him. Well, first of all, Oswald joined the marines and qualified as a sharpshooter with a rifle range score of 212. In 1959, when he was nearly done with the marines, he still shot a 191 and qualified as a marksman. That meant he could hit a 10 inch target 8 times out of 10, from 200 yards away. He was actually just 88 yards from JFK when he shot him. This was, to put it bluntly, a very, very easy kill shot for Lee Harvey Oswald. If you've ever been to Dealey Plaza and you've actually mapped out the distance, it looks like they are right next to each other. Any theory that exonerates Oswald is nonsense. Oswald clearly fired the killer shots. He had all the motive in the world for doing so. Oswald never knew his father. His mother was apparently a raging narcissist. He was dragged around 21 different homes in his first 17 years of life. According to author Gerald Posner, Oswald punched and tried to stab his mother, even though he slept in her bed until he was almost 11. He threatened his brother and sister-in-law with a knife. He was sent at 13 for a psychiatric examination. He became interested in marxism as a teenager, joined the marines at 17, and was court martialed and found guilty twice. He apparently had a breakdown while serving in the marines, weeping and firing shots into the night while on guard duty.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

As far as disinformation agents go, our next contestant is a doozy. Marita Lorenz comes out of nowhere in 1970’s and claims she was working for with Frank Sturgis, Howard Hunt, and the CIA to infiltrate and take out Castro. She also drags in Oswald and said she met him in 63, and even claims she met Jack Ruby at one point. She testified in front of the house select committee of assassinations, but her Testimony was deemed as unreliable. Personally, I believe she was employed to throw some more gas on the CIA and Oswald being involved in Kennedys death, and distract you from the truth. Supposedly she is a Holocaust survivor and from Germany. One can only assume she is Jewish ✡️. Further, as far as I can tell, no one corroborates her story except for Frank Sturgis, someone with known connections to the Mossad. If she really worked for the CIA, does it make sense, she would come out and say the CIA are doing all these things? 🧐 same with Frank Sturgis…. 🧵 19/25

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Also in 1975, Jewish ✡️ man Alan Weberman states the photo below is from the day of the Kennedy assassination, but also 2 of the men in the photo are CIA men Sturgis and Hunt. Years later this was proven to be incorrect, but the effect was still the same. They are planting in the public’s mind that if it’s not Oswald, it’s the CIA. The reason this was so important to do in the 70’s is because that’s when the Zapruder film was going to be seen by the masses. Webber also wrote a book called Coup Detat which helped push the narrative that the CIA was involved in Kennedy’s death, and amplified a fellow Jewish ✡️ man Tad Szulc’s theory that Howard Hunt was involved. Also to note Szulc, was initially the man who broke the bay of pigs story back in the 60’s. 🧐 Howard Hunt sued Webber and the book publisher for libel but dropped the case years later, citing financial reasons. 🧵 20/25

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

In the late 90’s a woman named Judyth Vary Baker comes out of nowhere and says she was Lee Oswald’s mistress, and that basically it was the CIA that killed Kennedy. One thing to note, in her first interview there is a menorah 🕎 in the bottom right corner of her room. She also says in interviews that she comes from a Hungarian family, so I’m assuming she is a Hungarian Jew, but cannot confirm. Regardless, this stuff about being Oswald’s girlfriend and being a part of a bioweapons program to take out the Cubans is very elaborate, but ultimately a distraction in my opinion. I don’t think any of it is verifiable, and again, at the end of the day, it is leading you off the path of the assailants. 🧵21/25

Video Transcript AI Summary
A clean-cut young man picked up something the speaker dropped. He smiled, and because he was polite and young, she agreed when he asked to walk her home. That was how she met Lee Harvey Oswald for the first time. Oswald then said that if he stayed with her, there would be one less bullet fired at Kennedy. The speaker said her heart turned over because she thought it was a courageous thing to say.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And, this very clean-cut, young gentleman standing behind me picked it up and handed it back. I looked at him and, he smiled and he's young like I am. And he was so clean-cut and so polite that when he asked me to, if I, he could walk me home, I said, yes. That was how I met Lee Harvey Oswald for the first time. And then he said, if I stay, there'll be one less bullet fired at Kennedy. And my heart just turned over because I thought that was such a courageous thing to say.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jack Ruby and Lee Harvey Oswald knew each other. According to Marcello, Ruby knew Oswald since he was a kid, watching him at get-togethers. When Oswald moved to Fort Worth, Marcello told Ruby and his friends to take care of him. Ruby did not want to kill Oswald. A recording exists of Jack Ruby being told that if he brought Oswald out, Oswald would be killed. Dave Ferry said he had no choice; they threatened to cut off every protruding part of his body, torture his dogs, and kill his sister and two brothers. Ruby, a Jewish mafia guy, was disposable.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Both sides trusted him. Did Jack Ruby and Lee Harvey Oswald know each other? Who? Jack Ruby and Lee Harvey Oswald. Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. In one time. You see, Marcello said he was, this absolutely a fact. There's no doubt about it, about his connections with the mafia. And remember in the Godfather where they have all these get togethers, Jackery was watching young Lee running around, you know, with the other kids and all that. He knew him from the time he was a kid. I mean, from time he's I haven't seen him. He knew who he was. And when his mother and they he had to move to the Fort Worth area here. Duce said this uncle Duce, he said he said to Jack Ruby and his friends, he said, take care of my boy. Take good care of him. He did not wanna kill him. We have record that this man's voice is Jack Ruby's voice. They called and said, look. If you bring him out, they have to kill him. Dave Ferry himself told me that he had no choice. They said they're gonna cut off every protruding part of his body if he didn't do it. They were gonna torture his dogs to death. They were gonna kill his sister and his 2 brothers, and then he was, you know, he was dead meat. Now he was a Jewish mafia guy. He could never be what they call a madman. So, I mean, he was disposable as far as they felt.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

What about the Warren Report? And who came up with the magic Bullet theory? If you don’t know the Magic Bullet Theory is the theory that there was 1 bullet that went through multiple people and that shot came from Oswald… that Theory was put forward by Jewish ✡️ man Arlen Spectre… Also on the Warren commission was Gerald Ford, and Earl Warren, both Freemasons. You may ask why is that important, but there has actually been multiple books written about the linkage of Freemasonry and Judaism ✡️, and how it is used as a way to manipulate non Jews for political power. Hitler actually wrote about this specifically. Take with that what you will. 🧵 22/25

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Who actually specified the route for JFK to take? That was the Dallas Citizens council. 2 of the key figures that dominated that council were Jewish. ✡️ Their public relations man, ✡️ Sam Bloom specifically was involved. Also Sam Blooms name and phone number were found in Jack Rubys home after Ruby Shot Oswald. Sam Bloom was also the former head of the very synagogue that Jack Ruby attended…. Another fun fact about Jack Ruby is that while he was in prison, he was appointed a Psychiatrist, who was a Jewish ✡️ man named Louis Joylon West. West was previously in charge of the CIA MK ultra mind control project, and many have speculated that Ruby sounded drugged in some of his interviews… What’s more is West stated that Ruby was legally insane. Maybe this was done to protect the Jewish Mobsters and Israel, or maybe this was done to try to get him a better deal later on. We will never know for sure. Some of has speculated that Ruby never really died, and made his way to Israel. I haven’t seen enough evidence of this so I can only assume it’s speculation. Regardless, it doesn’t matter. Ruby did exactly what he was supposed to do. He shut up Oswald, and he implicated no one else. 🧵 23/25

Video Transcript AI Summary
The real power center in Dallas was the Citizens Council, not right-wing WASPs. Two key figures who dominated the Citizens Council were Jewish. One was Julius Sheps, who held distribution rights in Dallas for Seagram's products. There is evidence that Jack Ruby had been on the Bronfman family payroll. The Citizens Council grabbed control of the arrangements for JFK's trip to Dallas through their public relations man, Sam Blum. Blum was a Dallas Jewish leader and former head of the synagogue that Jack Ruby attended. They set up JFK's route.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Actually not ruled by a bunch of right wing WASPs. Actually, the real power center in Dallas was the Citizens Council. That's not to be confused with the White Citizens Council. The Citizens Council was the elite group that ruled Dallas. 2 of the key figures who dominated the CC were Jewish. They were the guys who really ran Dallas and one of those power brokers was Julius Sheps, who held the distribution rights in Dallas for the Bronfman family, Seagram's products. And of course, as I mentioned the other night, there is pretty firm evidence that Jack Rubin himself had been on the payroll of the Bronson family. Well, here's the point. It was this Citizens Council that grabbed control of the arrangement for JFK's trip to Dallas. They were the ones who were completely in charge through their public relations man whose name was Sam Blum. He was a Dallas Jewish leader, the former head of the very synagogue that Jack Ruby attended. They're the people who set up JFK's route, and we'll talk a little bit more about that when we come back because it
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses gratitude for someone who enlightened them about the origins of Genesis and various religious beginnings. They mention visiting a synagogue or temple. The speaker feels separated but is being treated well by Sheriff Manager Bill Decker. The speaker jokes that writers wouldn't want to wish the Saturday Evening Post on Sheriff Decker. They describe Decker's deputies as very human and understanding, and mention someone named Dallas is 14.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Will not go into that except that he lets me believe in the origin of Genesis and all the various starting of the world that he Awesome. Enlighten me to these various parts of religion that I didn't grasp. So if you go to the synagogue or the temple, you, I think Zach, did you get the associate for the other person that I have? We speak, but, I'm separated from there. I'm being very well by the sheriff manager. Pardon me? Treated very well by Bill Decker. I should say this I should say this. I think if any of you writers and I know sheriff Decker is gonna isolate me after this. So you wouldn't want to spell the bread Saturday evening post to wish that on him, though, would you? We were saying way about his deputies too, don't we? Yes. Very human. Very understanding. Well, I think Dallas is 14.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

I’ll close with this. Once you’ve looked at the evidence, what do you think really happened? Did the CIA kill their own president they are sworn to protect? Or were people within our government working for their ethnic groups interest? Was Oswald some mastermind? Or a kid who got mixed up in the wrong situation? Was Jack Ruby a nobody? Or someone with tons of Jewish Israeli connections to the Mob and Israel. Is it a coincidence that as soon as LBJ gets into office, Israel no longer has hurdles for their nuclear program? Or that the Israeli foreign lobby is the only lobby that doesn’t have to register as a foreign lobby? Are all these Jewish ✡️ connections and cover ups mere coincidences? The Truth is we will never know exactly everything down to the last detail. But the Truth is we don’t need to. We need to know who had motive, who had capability, and who was implicated every step of the way. We already have this answer. The answer is not the CIA. 🧵 24/25

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes the JFK assassination conspiracy was simple, involving a small group, not a large, complex one. Jim Garrison indicted Clay Shaw, a New Orleans businessman, who was connected to Guy Bannister and David Ferri. The speaker presents a chart showing connections between Shaw, Bannister, Ferri, Lee Harvey Oswald, Cuban exiles, the mafia (Carlos Marcello), and the CIA, calling it the "New Orleans Nexus." The speaker claims Shaw, Bannister, and Ferri were connected through a European company called Permindex. According to the speaker, Permindex was not mythical and the primary force behind it was Tiber Rosenwald, who headed the International Credit Bank of Geneva, Switzerland. The speaker asserts this bank was Meyer Lansky's chief European money laundering operation, and that Lansky ran organized crime.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is about the JFK assassination that are remarkably complex. And it's like you have you have all sorts of people tripping over one another plotting to kill JFK. I don't think that was I don't think that was a big conspiracy at all. I keep saying this because I I really think it's very simple and yet very profound. The people were who who were involved in the conspiracy, they weren't one big happy family. They were one small happy family. And as I document in the book, it really took only a handful of people to set the conspiracy in motion. Now let me show you this Clay Shaw connection. I've kind of been going around it because those of you who are familiar with JFK know the basic theory about that Jim Garrison presented. Clay Shaw was a businessman. Let me refer to my notes here because I have a chart. This chart took me literally years to make because I worked just because well, it finally came to me one afternoon, and I'm I'm glad it did because I think it really ties it all together. And it is in the new edition of the book, so you're getting a real good preview here. Here's Clay Shaw, the New Orleans businessman who was indicted by Jim Garrison. Now Shaw was connected with Guy Bannister, who I mentioned earlier, who in turn, of course, was connected with the ADL. He was also a gentleman named David Fairey. He was played by Joe Pesci in the movie. And, of course, you get down here to the lower level people. This chart, I'm not gonna give you the whole thing because I don't want everybody to be confused. This is Lee Harvey Oswald. Here's those Cuban exiles we keep hearing about. Okay. Then you have the mafia. Everybody hears about the mafia and Carlos Marcello. And you have the CIA. And, of course, the CIA, they were involved too just as and, of course, you can connect. Is anybody getting confused by this so far? You're all able to follow along? I'll pass this chart out in so you can see it in detail, but I wanna explain it up here first. Here's the CIA. This is what what this picture right here, I would call this the New Orleans Nexus. This is the standard basic conspiracy theory on a JFK assassination. Well, you had some mafia elements. You had some CIA elements. They were connected. They were all connected to the Cubans, and Oswald was connected. And then there was Clay Shaw, who was connected to the CIA and Bannister and Ferry and the mafia. This is the part that they leave out. It's very simple, but this is why they have to leave it out. Clay Shaw, Guy Bannister, and David Ferri were all jointly connected in their own fashion but working together with a company based in Europe. I love this name. It's a great name. I wish I had thought of it myself called Permindex. Now this company existed. This isn't a mythical company. Now in the movie, JFK, you see the character playing Jim Garrison confront Clayshaw and say, well, you served in the board of a CIA front company called Permindex, and Clayshaw says, oh, I'm going to sue. That's not true. Well, here's what Oliver Stone doesn't tell you about Permindex. The primary force behind Permindex was a guy named Tiber Rosenwald. He headed the International Credit Bank of Geneva, Switzerland. The International Credit Bank of Geneva, Switzerland was the chief European money laundering operation for Meyer Lansky, which, of course, he was the real boss of the mob. We call it the mafia because that's a good way to frame it on the Italian Americans. But Meyer Lansky Meyer Lansky ran organized crime.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Permindex is potentially connected to the Mossad through Tiber Rosenbaum, who was a high-ranking money launderer and arms procurement officer for the Mossad. One Israeli newspaper allegedly stated that Tiber Rosenbaum *is* Israel. The speaker claims Permindex was a Mossad money laundering operation connected to Clay Shaw, Guy Bannister, and David Ferri. Lee Harvey Oswald was allegedly connected to Clay Shaw. The speaker suggests that if Oswald shot John F. Kennedy, investigators should examine Shaw's connections. The speaker's book reportedly details these connections, and the speaker challenges anyone to disprove these claims.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So now here's the kicker for all this. When some of these, quote, unquote, liberal JFK assassination researchers go so far as to even mention Permindex, and maybe they'll mention Meyer Lansky, and maybe even mention Louis Bloomfield, the one thing they forget to mention is the Israeli connection. Now if you can believe this, there's even one guy who gets into Permendex, and he says that Permindex was a Nazi front. Now if Permindex okay. Now if let's just say he's right. Now I can't say he's right. If Permindex is a Nazi front, then what's Tiber Rosenbaum and Louis Bloomfield and the Brodmann family, who are very anti Nazi from what I've heard lately? Why are they associated with Permindex? Now I still haven't really mentioned Israel because here's the here's here's the icing on the cake. This guy, Tiber Rosenbaum and this is all documented in the book. It's taken from mainstream sources. Tiber Rosenbaum was one of the highest ranking, long standing money launderers and arms procurement officers for, guess what, the Mossad. He is the Mossad. In fact, I don't even need to add another box there. I could add another box there. But one of Israel's newspapers when Tiber Rosenbaum got in trouble a few years ago, they said Tiber Rosenbaum is Israel. So without getting into the name, we'll just say, here's a Mossad right here. And Permindex is a Mossad money laundering operation. And Clay Shaw is connected to it, and Guy Bannister is connected to it, and David Ferri is connected to it. And guess who's connected with them? So I don't think Lee Harvey Oswald was involved in I don't think he shot John f Kennedy. But if he did shoot John f Kennedy, a real detective would say, well, let's see. He's mixed up with Clay Shaw, and and he was working for Clay Shaw. So, well, who's Clay Shaw mixed up with? Well, this is the thing. You're not allowed to mention any of this. My book mentions all that, and I'm sorry if that upsets people. But if they did it, they did it. And if I'm wrong, all I ask is that somebody come and prove me wrong. One way to prove me wrong is for to have let me speak at and let me pass this out. You can take
Video Transcript AI Summary
The ADL stated that "mainstream conspiracy theorists" could have been invited instead of Michael Collins Piper. Years prior, Abe Foxman of the ADL said that believing the military industrial complex killed JFK or that Bavarian Freemasons controlled the secular left makes one susceptible to believing Bradley Smith, Louis Farrakhan, and Leonard Jeffries. Foxman claimed such conspiracy theories' "research" is rigged to reach predetermined conclusions. The speaker interprets this to mean that believing in the military industrial complex's involvement in the JFK assassination is something one "shouldn't believe." After Piper's book was released, the ADL allegedly changed its tune, suggesting it's okay to believe in conspiracy theories, just not the ones Piper promotes.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: ADL said conspiracy theories were responsible. They actually said that, well, there are a lot of mainstream conspiracy theorists who could have been invited rather than mister Piper. That's what they said to the public. Okay? In other words, well, mister Piper's not mainstream, but some conspiracy theorists are. So don't invite him. Well, here is what Abe Foxman, the head of the ADL, said, several years ago before he knew I was gonna be invited to Orange County. This is very interesting. If segments of the population are really willing to believe that president Kennedy was killed by the military industrial complex because he was too soft on communism or that a secret group of Bavarian Freemasons has controlled the secular left for more than 200 years, then it is not hard to imagine some of these same people falling for the lives of Bradley Smith, I think a lot of you know who Bradley Smith is, or the fabrications of Louis Farrakhan and Leonard Jeffries. All of these conspiracy theories share the core feature that the, quote, unquote, research, which supports them, little more, in fact, than a compendium of anecdotes divorced from their original context, that's a mouthful, is rigged to arrive at predetermined conclusions, not historical revelations or insights. Now that is a mouthful, but what they're saying is that even if you believe that the military industrial complex, whatever the military industrial complex is, if you believe that they were involved in the JFK assassination, then you believe something that you shouldn't believe. That's what they say in some crazy book. It's not crazy to them, though. But anti Semitism in America, Outspoken Experts Explode the Mist, a book that only a a Semite or an anti Semite, I suppose, would read, not a normal human being. Needless to say, this was their in house party line before my book got out to the public. Then when my book got out to the public, of course, they changed their tune and decided that well or at least they told the public this. Well, it's okay to believe in conspiracy theories. But God forbid, you should believe in the one that that that Mike Piper is promoting. Now that that's kind of interesting. You know, I understand
Video Transcript AI Summary
Lobby.org/azcdoj details the history of when APAC, then known as the American Zionist Council, almost had to register as a foreign agent. President John F. Kennedy was allegedly about to force their registration under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA). The website provides access to original documents and testimonies related to the legal case. In June-July 1963, the federal government was nearing a decision requiring the American Zionist Council to register as an agent of the Israeli government. According to the transcript, a Zionist lawyer, Mr. Linden, advised that public registration would be injurious to the American Zionist Council. Donald Rumsfeld was allegedly involved. By October 1963, forms were being prepared for the American Zionist Council to register under FARA. The transcript then poses the question of what happened in November 1963.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Lobby.org/azcdoj. It's a history of when APAC almost had to register as a foreign agent. And back then, they were known as the American Zionist Council. Right there? The American Zionist Council? Well, it turns out that president John f Kennedy was about to force them to register under Farr, and this is a history of all of the original documents that pertain to the legal case. And when you click on any of these links, it'll take you to original archive sources of the actual documents from the actual testimonies that you can read. Even cool little snippets like this that say federal lawyers are near decision on whether to require the AZC to register as an agent of the Israeli government. And back in June July of 1963, the federal government was nearing a decision requiring the American Zionist Council registering as an agent of the Israeli government. Americans of whatever faith believe firmly that America is their country and America alone. The Zionist lawyer, mister Linden, advised that public registration would be injurious to the American Zionist Council. You might notice that the honorable Donald Rumsfeld was involved, and as 1963 went on, it all heated up. And by October of 1963, they were saying things like forms are enclosed for the use of the American Zionist Council and registering under the foreign agents registration act. But then what happened in November of 1963?

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

If you appreciated this thread, consider donating to this page via buymeacoffee.com/Uncommonsince76 🧵 25/25 I appreciate your support!

TheIntelSCIF
Posted - March 4, 2025 at 2:55 AM
Saved - March 5, 2025 at 2:50 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explored the connections between Basquiat's "Red Face," Ellen and Jay-Z's hoodies, and the Frazzledrip conspiracy. Basquiat, a pivotal figure in Neo-Expressionism, infused his work with themes of magic and sacrifice. The conspiracy involves disturbing allegations against Anthony Weiner and ties to high-profile figures like Hillary Clinton, suggesting a cover-up of horrific acts. I discussed how these themes of ritualistic practices and child sacrifice are woven into elite culture and media, revealing a dark undercurrent that challenges conventional beliefs. Everything is interconnected, and there are no coincidences.

@TheIntelSCIF - The SCIF

The breakdown of the infamous Basquiat "Red Face" on Ellen and Jay-Z’s hoodies and its alleged connection to the Frazzledrip conspiracy, human ritualistic ceremonies, and sacrifices. First, we'll start with Jean-Michel Basquiat. He was a Brooklyn-born, influential African-American artist who rose to fame in the 1980s New York underground scene. His work, known for its gestural marks and primitive style, is considered a groundbreaking contribution to the Neo-Expressionism movement. He considered himself a magician with ties to Haitian Voodoo, Dark Magick ritualistic practices, summoning, and worshiping spirits. A lot of his artwork has many layers of meaning and resembles ancient carvings of human sacrifice, especially the "skulls" and his "crown," which also resemble power, individualism, wealth, etc. What is the Frazzledrip conspiracy, and how does it relate to the "red face" of Basquiat’s artwork? Anthony Weiner was caught and arrested for crimes against a minor. Anthony's wife at the time was Huma Abedin, Hillary Clinton's right-hand woman. Allegedly, when the NYPD went through Anthony's laptop, they found a file named "insurance policy" and it contained a video said to be once circulating on the dark web, along with Diddy's freakoff videos, which can be purchased for a large amount of money that showed Hillary and Huma basically skinning a girl, and torturing her to extract Adrenochrome which is "Adrenalized blood." A "snuff film," and performing a ritual. The drug of choice among wealthy elites to get high on and many other purposes, including ritualistic ceremonies and sacrifices. Where this ties together is what they did to the girl, by allegedly cutting her face off and wearing it on their own, the red face on Ellen and Jay-Z’s sweatshirt resembles and mocks what they did to the girl's face. There are also many T.V. shows and movies that mock this as well. After 9 out of 12 officers who allegedly saw the contents and told the FBI, they wanted to prosecute Hillary. Then, the NYPD officers, in a very short time period, all associated with the case, started to mysteriously die by suicide and freak accidents. The FBI then stepped in, took the laptop, and then the case and laptop were never heard of or seen again. What's important here is that JAMES COMEY was the director of the FBI at the time and is known for covering up for the elites involved with child trafficking and abuse. His daughter was also the one in charge of the Jeffery Epstein suicide security tape that was also covered up. They told the press there was no evidence on the laptop and that all the NYPD cops who died were all stressed out from the job and all just happened to die around the time of when this information was all coming out and being covered up. These elites are all into Satanism, Black Magick, worshiping and summoning spirits, and performing ritualistic type ceremonies and sacrifices, which also involve adults and children, which is the highest offering to their gods. Take everything YOU believe and throw it out the window. It doesn't matter what you believe. It matters what they believe. Voodoo, Satanism, and child sacrifice have been going on for thousands of years, and there is evidence all over. This is what goes on behind closed doors and why you see such a push for Satanic practices all throughout the media and Hollywood and pushed on children. It's even promoted through Disney. This is nothing new, and it's all connected. Baal and Moloch are the gods of child sacrifice, and Hillary even mentions Moloch in her email. This is the big secret. These people worship spirits and gods of dark forces and sexually abuse and traffick children for pleasure and ritualistic ceremonies and practices, blackmail other elites while they show you and mock you through symbolism, every chance they get. The sooner you understand this, the sooner everything begins to make sense. It's all connected. There are no coincidences.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tonight, let's discuss Game of Games and the celebrities who idolize Jean-Michel Basquiat. Some believe he was a medium channeling the eternal through art, connected to Haitian gods like Urzili. Coincidentally, P Diddy has a tattoo of Urzili. Switching gears, the Carthaginians may have sacrificed children to Moloch, a deity associated with child sacrifice. Archaeological evidence supports this, with mass burials of cremated infants discovered. Hillary Clinton's knowledge of Moloch raises questions. Moving on to Anthony Weiner's laptop, it contained over 15,000 of Hillary Clinton's emails. An NYPD source claimed it held evidence of serious crimes, including child exploitation. A video on the laptop, titled "insurance policy," allegedly depicted horrifying acts against a child. Some claim that the NYPD found evidence on Weiner's laptop that Hillary Clinton visited Jeffrey Epstein's sex island.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm calling Twitch so we can talk about Game of Games tonight. Have any of you actually discovered who this guy is yet? And I'm not talking about Jay Z. I'm talking about this guy right here. A lot of celebrities have his art, and some celebrities idolize him so much they spend millions of dollars on his artwork and his hairstyles too. This is Jean Michel Basquiat, the boyfriend of Madonna before the world even knew her name. And it kind of made me wonder why certain celebrities idolize him so much. For example, like his three pointed crown, which was Chris Rock's first tattoo at the age of 55, in which LeBron James jumped in on that too. Same for P Diddy and Dave Bautista. And it made me wonder why Hollywood finds Basquiat's artwork more unique than anyone else's. For one article state that he was a medium, a magician. His mission was nothing less than the restoration of powerful spiritual function to art, a channeling of the eternal through the ephemeral. Articles state that Basquiat was a scion of Haiti. He knows the law as the Haitian gods, and he knows what they sound like on a jazz record. He can hear Urzili when she's speaking through the clarinet and he understands the relationship between possession on the dance floor that the gods are in the music. And I find it extremely coincidental that P Diddy has a massive back tattoo of Urzili or Azili Dantor on his back. They're pretty spot on I'd say. And how ironic is it that Madonna depicts Alize as well right down to the heart. Many celebrities own his art especially Ellen and believe me she has many. Speaker 1: One of the most bitterly debated subjects in classical archaeology is whether or not the Carthaginians, an ancient civilization in North Africa, killed their children for their gods. Evidence for the worship of Moloch is found in the Old Testament with variant names Molek, Melek, and Bal, meaning lord, and also the Phoenician theonim for Moloch is MLK. If the classical reports are accurate, Moloch represents a deity or symbology associated with child sacrifice and is fervently despised in the Old Testament. No archaeological or historical evidence states Moloch or any of his variant names resemble an owl. Rabbinical tradition depicted Moloch as a bronze statue with the head of a bull and a large human body where victims were thrown into fire. The Canaanite deity has also been drawn and referred to as Kronos due to the parallel metheme of the Titan God devouring his children. The ritualistic intimations of Bal and Moloch have existed for thousands of years with modern reimaginings depicting the idol as a machine. Other controversial interpretations can be found in the origins of Freemasonry as revealed in the Royal Arch degree in the rituals of exaltation. The name of the great architect of the universe is a trinity of words, Jabulan, translating to Yahweh, Baal, and Osiris, the ancient Egyptian god of fertility, resurrection, and the underworld. In Tunisia, just outside Jerusalem, children were said to have been sacrificed to Baal by being quote passed through fire in an area called Atophet. According to Rashi, the single most influential commentator of the middle ages, the massive statue of quote Molech, which was of copper, and they would heat it up from underneath with its hands spread out, and they would place the child on his hands, and he would be burnt and moan, and the priests would beat drums so the father should not hear his son's voice and take pity, end quote. It's pertinent to understand the Hebrew Bible referred to Moloch worship as Canaanite idolatry straying away from Judaism. The quotes from Leviticus are clear. But the religion of Carthage in North Africa managed to continue the Canaanite ritual. With several modifications, they birthed what the Jewish virtual library called the Cult of Moloch, creating the largest Tophet ever discovered, covering almost four miles with nine descending levels. Rabbinical tradition state quote, the body of Moloch was hollow, divided into seven compartments, in one which they put flower, in the second through sixth they put animals, and in the seventh, a child, which were all burned together by heating the statue inside. But in 1923, French led excavations at Carthage found some 20,000 burials containing cremated infant and animal bones kept in urns, inscribed with dedications to balk and the Phoenician Theonim for Moloch. They discovered long genealogical pedigrees signifying noble families with one lineage stretching back 16 generations, suggesting the ritual was quote, an elite practice. The University of Oxford published a study of the findings, concluding the Greek and Roman accounts were true, and not, as modern scholars believed, propaganda. They also reaffirmed previous analyses that because the ritual was so expensive, only the wealthiest and most powerful in Carthage could have practiced it. The cult of Moloch was real, an unspeakable evil carried out by wealthy humans while their society was flourishing. An author of the study said, we should not imagine that ancient people thought like us and were horrified by the same things. But remember, the Greeks and the Romans were just as appalled then as we are now. Even many animals have an unquenchable desire for the safety of their offspring. And with the cult of Moloch substantiated, it would seem that anyone knowledgeable of its horror would react with abhorrence and disgust. And with most of the world having no idea about this, why then or how then does Hillary Clinton know about Moloch? Speaker 2: Help. Speaker 3: And they didn't look at a fraction of the emails on Anthony Weiner's laptop. Speaker 2: So who is Anthony Weiner again? You know, this guy and this guy. Things seem to be going pretty great for Anthony. A congressman himself, he was married to Huma Abedin, an American political staffer who was vice chair of Hillary Clinton's two thousand sixteen campaign for president of the United States. Abetting seemed to be a sure thing for a Clinton White House. Of course, that was before police began to investigate her husband, Anthony, who was ultimately sentenced to twenty one months in federal prison for an illicit online contact with a 15 year old girl. During its investigation, the FBI found over 15,000 emails on a private email server of Hillary Clinton's. Here's the document showing the seizure of the laptop. Speaker 3: So one of the things if I were the president, I'd do is demand the Anthony Weiner laptop and get it to the most trusted person in the military to take apart everything on it and then start using it. There's a lot that can be prosecuted, I have no doubt, on that laptop. Speaker 2: So what all was found on this laptop? Well, the NYPD source says that the Wiener laptop has enough evidence to put Hillary away for life. It said that these emails include evidence linking Clinton herself and associates to money laundering, child exploitation, sex crimes with minors, perjury, pay to play through the Clinton Foundation, obstruction of justice, and other felony crimes. It's worth noting that this is not the first time the Clintons have been tied to crimes involving exploitation of children. Remember Laura Silsbee, who was convicted of child trafficking? And how about this guy? You know, this guy and this guy. Internet sleuths discovered apparent evidence of pedophile code words being used in emails from John Podesta released by WikiLeaks. This was in November of twenty sixteen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, just when we think it can't get any worse with some of these corruptions we've heard about her, Apparently, there was a hidden file on Weiner's laptop with a video in it entitled insurance policy. Understand this is no longer a conspiracy. There were a total of 12 individuals who saw this video, and nine of those 12 people are dead now. Speaker 4: What the hell is going on here? Speaker 5: So far this year, there have been nine NYPD suicides, seven since June. Last year, there were a total of four. Speaker 2: The video is described as pure evil. Now this is my final warning before I go into detail describing this video. The bad video is of Hillary, Huma, and a little girl. They are terrorizing the child. They filleted the child's face off while she was alive and put it on their faces to further terrorize the child. They were deliberately causing the child's body to release adrenochrome into the bloodstream so they could drink the blood when they bled her out in the satanic ritual sacrifice. This was what caused grown men to become extremely sick, and many needed to seek out psychological help after viewing it. The perpetrators all need to be hung by the neck until dead. These are very psychologically messed up murderers, vile, demented, and soulless demons. Multiple sources within the FBI and NYPD have confirmed the existence of this tape. And then, of course, recently, there's this. Speaker 3: In fact, I heard that the New York police officers who saw some of it, even though they're hardened investigators, literally had to go throw up. It's bad. Speaker 4: Because of Weiner Gates and the sexting scandal, the NYPD started investigating it through a subpoena, through a warrant. They searched his laptop and sure enough found those 650,000 emails. They found way more stuff than just the, more information pertaining to the the inappropriate texting the guy was doing. They found state department emails. They found a lot of other really damning criminal information, including money laundering, including the fact that Hillary went to this sex island with convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Bill Clinton went there more than 20 times. Hillary Clinton went there at least six times. The amount of garbage that they found in these emails of criminal activities by Hillary, by her immediate circle, and even by other, Democratic members of Congress was so disgusting, they gave it to the FBI, and they said, we're going to go public with this if you don't reopen the investigation, if you don't do the right thing with timely indictments. NYPD was the first one to look at that laptop. Weiner and Huma Abidin, his wife, the closest advisor of Hillary Clinton for twenty years, have both flipped, and Huma Abidin, his wife, the closest adviser of Hillary Clinton for twenty years, have both flipped. K? They are cooperating. Speaker 5: This article from newsfromtheperimeter.com. Deaths become her. Nine out of twelve people who saw Anthony Weiner's laptop are dead. There were a total of 12 individuals who saw Anthony Weiner's laptop computer. None of those 12 people are dead now. Now that is a strange coincidence. Anthony Weiner is alive. Weiner shared the laptop with his estranged wife, Houma Abidine, a close aid to Hillary Clinton since February. Speaker 3: In fact, I heard that the New York police officers who saw some of it, even though they're hardened investigators, literally had to go throw up. It's bad.
ShadowofEzra
Posted - March 19, 2025 at 12:06 AM
Saved - March 19, 2025 at 7:29 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just read about newly released JFK files revealing that Gary Underhill, connected to the CIA, fled Washington the day after Kennedy's assassination, alleging a CIA clique was involved. Less than six months later, he was found dead with a gunshot wound behind his ear, officially ruled a suicide.

@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra

Newly released JFK files reveal that CIA-connected Gary Underhill fled Washington the day after Kennedy’s a*sassination, claiming a small CIA clique was responsible. Less than six months later, he was found dead in his apartment with a gunshot wound behind his ear—an unusual spot for suicide. Despite the circumstances, his death was officially ruled a suicide.

rayngls
Posted - March 19, 2025 at 1:23 AM
Saved - July 12, 2025 at 6:04 AM

@rayngls - Raymond Ng

JUST IN: Declassified JFK file tells the story of a man named Gary Underhill who confided in his friends and family that he knew the CIA was responsible for the assassination one day after it occurred and that he was fearful for his life. Six months later, he "committed suicide." Coincidence?

BasedSamParker
Posted - June 6, 2025 at 3:09 AM
Saved - June 6, 2025 at 6:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Today marks the anniversary of RFK's assassination and Israel's attack on Egypt, events I believe are interconnected. I argue that both RFK and JFK were victims of a larger conspiracy, with Frank Mankiewicz, RFK's press secretary, playing a pivotal role in misleading the public. His involvement in media manipulation extends to the Watergate scandal and the film "JFK," which I contend obscures Israel's role in these assassinations. I explore how narratives around RFK's death were shaped by political figures like LA Mayor Sam Yorty, suggesting a deeper plot at play.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

1/ Today, June 5th, is the day RFK was shot (1968) & the day israel launched its sneak attack on Egypt, starting the 6-Day War (1967). The 2 events are connected, as we'll see in this thread. The RFK assassination is also connected to the JFK assassination, but the same people behind the 2 assassinations have gone to great lengths to hide this fact. They don't want you associating what are clearly serial murders by the same killer. They want you thinking both assassinations were perpetrated by lone gunmen for unrelated reasons. We all know the conventional JFK narrative: the assassin Lee Harvey Oswald was a disaffected communist radical lone gunman. The conventional RFK narrative is similar & goes something like this: the assassin was a disaffected Palestinian radical lone gunman named Sirhan Sirhan hated RFK because he supported israel. Sirhan resolved to assassinate RFK on or before the anniversary of the 6-Day War as revenge for RFK's support of israel. Sirhan went to the Ambassador Hotel during the California Primary on June 4th, 1968, and waited in the kitchen, whereupon he opened fire on RFK after the night's victory celebration. And thus Arab/Middle East terrorism in America was born. There's just one problem: Sirhan couldn't have killed RFK, for several reasons which are easily looked up. Even RFK Jr. knows this narrative is bullshit and that Sirhan was a patsy (see below)--which means that everything we're told to reinforce the conventional narrative is also bullshit. This thread will explore the real plot & colluders who helped lead us down the wrong path. This thread assumes you know that the jеws were the masterminds behind the JFK assassination. We start with Frank Mankiewicz, RFK's press secretary, whom an eye-witness testifies guided RFK to the kitchen where Sirhan was waiting, instead of the ballroom as originally planned. Her testimony is confirmed by literal video evidence (see below). Mankiewicz was a jеwish member of the Anti-Defamation League of the B'nai B'rith, aka the ADL. Watch:

Video Transcript AI Summary
After his victory speech, Bobby Kennedy was to be led to a mariachi band. Dolores Huerta states her job was to take the senator to the ballroom where the band was waiting. According to the transcript, Frank Mankowitz, described as an anti-defamation league spy operating on behalf of the Israeli Mossad who infiltrated Kennedy's campaign as his press secretary, turned RFK toward the kitchen pantry where assassins waited. Huerta says that as they left the podium, they directed the senator to the kitchen, and she was unable to catch up with him. The transcript claims Mankowitz blocked Kennedy's path and ensured he couldn't escape the gunmen. According to the transcript, Sirhan Sirhan fired two shots at Kennedy from five feet away. One shot hit Paul Schrad, and the other went past Kennedy's ear and hit a door jam. The transcript states the autopsy report made it clear that Sirhan could not have killed Kennedy, a conclusion Thomas Noguchi, the coroner, also reached.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When we got to the podium, I thought where's his security? There's no security. He just had he just let me security. There was one person. Speaker 1: I thank all of you. And Dolores Huerta, who is an old friend of mine and has worked the union. My thanks to all of you, and now it's on to Chicago and let's win there. Speaker 2: After Kennedy's victory speech, Dolores Huerta had been officially assigned to lead him off the stage to his right, which is to the left if you're facing the stage, in order to walk through the crowded ballroom and meet up with a mariachi band. Speaker 0: The plan was that after he spoke, my job was to take the senator over to the ballroom. We had a mariachi band that was waiting there for him. Speaker 2: After his speech, Bobby Kennedy turns right and begins heading toward the mariachi band as planned. However, Frank Mankowitz, an anti defamation league spy operating on behalf of the Israeli Mossad, had infiltrated Bobby Kennedy's campaign under the cover of being his press secretary. Mankiewicz turns RFK around and points him into the kitchen pantry where a team of assassins waited to ambush and shoot Kennedy. Speaker 0: But as we left the podium, they said, senator, come to the kitchen. And then one of our staff, they caught my arm and say, Dolores, what happened? You're supposed to be taking him to the bottom. I said I'm I said, they're taking him to the kitchen. And then I couldn't catch up with the senator after that. Speaker 2: Let's watch it again in slow motion. Kennedy turns to his right, our left as we face the stage, and begins walking toward the mariachi band. He encounters ADL and Israeli Mossad assassination coordinator Frank Mankowitz. Mankowitz spins Bobby around by pointing him directly toward the ambush in the kitchen. Mankowitz blocks Bobby's path and moves forward toward Kennedy to ensure RFK can't escape from the gunmen waiting in the kitchen. A hotel maitre d' named Karl Euker was used as a pawn to grab Bobby's arm and lead him into the ambush. Mankiewicz made sure no real security was available to guard Bobby. Speaker 3: When I sat down and read the autopsy report, it became clear to me as it would to anybody who read that report, that Sirhan could not have killed my father, which is what Thomas Noguchi, the coroner, the most important coroner probably in American history, concluded also and said in his autobiography. And here's the here's what happened, the short story. Sirhan fired two shots at my father. He was five feet away. There was, as I said, many, many there was absolute mayhem in the kitchen of the Ambassador Hotel. My father just won the primary. He said from the stage, and now it's on to Chicago, which is where the convention was. Then he walks off the stage, and he went into a route that was not expected. He was led into a route through the kitchen, which he was not supposed to go to. And waiting in the kitchen, in an ambush, was Sirhan Sirhan, neck standing in front of a steam table. And as my father approached the steam table, Surhan fired at him. Two shots. One of those hit Paul Schrad. The other one went past my father's ear and hit a door jam behind my father, a wooden door jam, from which it was later removed by the LAPD.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2/ After having led RFK to his death in the kitchen on June 5th, Frank Mankiewicz famously delivers the news of RFK's death to the world on June 6th, 1968. Look how convincingly he sells the deception of his involvement. https://t.co/gWdJTUTKRg

Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator Robert Francis Kennedy died at 1:44 AM on June 6, 1968. He was 42 years old. Present at the time of his death were his wife Ethel, his sisters Mrs. Stephen Smith and Mrs. Patricia Lawford, his brother-in-law Mr. Stephen Smith, and his sister-in-law Mrs. John F. Kennedy.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Senator Robert Francis Kennedy died at 01:44AM today, 06/06/1968, with senator Kennedy at the time of his death were his wife Ethel, his sisters Mrs. Stephen Smith, Mrs. Patricia Lawford, brother-in-law Mr. Stephen Smith, and his sister-in-law Mrs. John F. Kennedy. He was 42 years old.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

3/ But Frank Mankiewicz was just getting started in helping sell jеwish psyops & deceptions. He wrote 3 books chronicling Nixon's Watergate guilt: https://t.co/wWAsUBxYFY

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

4/ Oh, you didn't know that Watergate was an engineered plot to oust Nixon? Listen to Tucker Carlson outline the plot & connect it to the JFK assassination. Note: Tucker leaves out that Bob Woodward's partner was Carl Bernstein (✡️) & that the Washington Post, which led the anti-Nixon charge in the press, was owned & run by the Graham family (✡️).

Video Transcript AI Summary
Richard Nixon was taken out by the FBI and CIA with help from Bob Woodward, a Washington Post reporter who had been a naval intelligence officer in the Nixon White House. Woodward, whose main source for Watergate was the number two guy at the FBI, was a tool of secret power used to remove Nixon, the most popular president in American history, from office. Nixon was replaced by Gerald Ford, who sat on the Warren Commission and became vice president because Carl Albert, the Democrat speaker of the house, insisted. The people who broke into the Watergate office building were mostly CIA employees. Nixon was elected by more votes than any president in history in 1972, but was undone two years later by a naval intel officer, the number two guy at the FBI, and CIA employees.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look at what happened to Richard Nixon, which I, of course, did not understand at all. Richard Nixon was taken out by the FBI and CIA. And with the help of Bob Bob Woodward, who was a Washington Post reporter who had been a naval intelligence officer working in the White House, working in the Nixon White House. And then he shows up, like, a year later, and he's this brand new reporter. He'd never been a journalist at all. He's a naval intel officer. The famous Bob Woodward, we all revere, and he's at the Washington Post. And somehow he gets the biggest story in the history of the Washington Post. He's the lead guy in that story. Well, I I worked at a newspaper. I've been in the news business my whole life. That is not how it works. You don't take a kid like his first day from a totally unrelated business and put him on the biggest story. But he was. He was that guy. And who is his main source for Watergate? Oh, the number two guy at the FBI. Oh, so you have the naval intelligence officer working with the FBI official to destroy the president. Okay. So that's a deep state coup. What else how would you describe that? If that happened in Guatemala, what would you say? And yet the way it was framed and the way that I accepted for decades was, oh, this intrepid reporter fought power. No. No. No. This intrepid reporter, Bob Woodward, was a tool of power, secret power, which is the most threatening kind, to bounce the single most popular president in American history, Richard Nixon, from office before the end of his term and replace him with who? Oh, Gerald Ford, who sat on the Warren Commission. Now how did Gerald Ford get to be Richard Nixon's vice president? Well, because Carl Albert, the Democrat speaker of the house, told him you must choose him. We will only confirm him when they sent the actual elected vice president away for tax evasion, Spiro Agnew of Maryland. So you have a complete setup like an abs Joe Ford, the only unelected president in American history, actually sat on the Warren Commission. Something else that I accepted at face value until I looked at it, I was like, that's completely insane. You didn't wanna interview Jack Ruby in your investigation of the of the assassination? Okay. You're fake. Yeah. He was on the Warren Commission. And so sorry for the long story, but the point is, like, that that happened in front of all of us, but the way it was framed cloaked to the obvious reality of it. The people who broke into the Watergate Office building from which the name is taken, Watergate, I think it was six of them or seven of them. All but one was a CI employee. That that's real. It's like look it up on Google. So the whole thing, Richard Nixon was elected by more votes than any president in American history in the nineteen seventy two election. He was the most popular by votes, which is the only way we can really measure popularity, the most popular president in his reelection campaign. And two years later, he's gone, undone by a naval intel officer, the number two guy at the FBI, and a bunch of CIA employees. You tell me what that is. Those are the facts. Those are not disputed facts. That's not crackpot shit.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

5/ Why did the jеws oust Nixon? The White House tapes capture the reasons: he was aware of the jеwish infiltration of the government & other institutions that had happened leading up to and subsequent to the JFK assassination, and had resolved to do something about it. https://t.co/a5JfNIWJfx

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 believes "they" don't share the same beliefs "as we believe in" and dislike things like "reader's diagette," preferring "pornographic stuff." Speaker 1 mentions being invited to lunch with Time magazine editors, a first since Henry Luce. Speaker 0 says "they" control the media, unrelated to antisemitism. Speaker 1 agrees "they're the ones putting out the pornographic stuff." Speaker 1 references the Bible's distinction between "the synagogue of Satan" and "the remnant of God's people," claiming the former are energized by supernatural power. Speaker 1 believes "they" possess a "strange brilliance" and recalls Hitler's time, stating "they" had a "stranglehold" on Germany's banking, media, and everything else. Speaker 1 asserts this "stranglehold" must be broken to save the country. Speaker 0 agrees but feels unable to say it. Speaker 1 suggests a second term could enable action.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And if they get in, they're gonna turn the country that way. They don't believe that they as we believe in. They did that kind of thing with smart hands carny. They reviewed. That's right. They don't believe in that, sir. They don't they and also, they don't believe in such things as the reader's diagette. No. They think it's corny. They like that pornographic stuff that appears in the light or not, which I hope goes down the drain and continues the kind Speaker 1: of By the way, Hedley Donovan has just invited me to have lunch with all their editors here on March 7 and I was quite amazed because this is the first time I've heard from Time magazine since Henry Luce Is that right? I don't know any of them now. Speaker 0: They're everything because he took the whole thing off. And it has nothing to do with the antisemitism. It happens so that insofar as the media is concerned, the power of the media. They've got it. They've got it right by Speaker 1: And they're the ones putting out the pornographic stuff and putting out everything. Speaker 0: I don't know why they do it. You see Speaker 1: the bible makes a distinction, Mr. President, between two groups of Jews. One is called the synagogue of Satan. Different kinds. There's those people in the latter days it's called the remnant of God's people, which will be Jewish people. And then there's the synagogue of Satan. Nearly all of your religious deceptions in the latter days, what the Bible speaks, latter days can be a thousand years, what they call the synagogue of Satan. In other words, they are energized by supernatural power called the devil. This is what the Bible teaches whether you believe it or don't believe it. This is the biblical teaching. This is what I believe. And I believe that you have, they have a strange brilliance about them. They have a They're And they are energized in my judgment by supernatural power. Well also they do something else, but they're not only smart. And you see, of course Hitler didn't, they had a stranglehold on Germany, on the banking of Germany, on everything in Germany and the media. They had the whole thing you see. But he went about it wrong. But but this stranglehold has got to be broken or this country is gonna go down to drain. You believe that? Yes, sir. Oh, boy. I can't ever Speaker 0: say it, but I believe it. No. But if Speaker 1: you've ever elected the second time, you might be able to do something. Let me turn to sun

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

6/ Circling back to Frank Mankiewicz, he wrote another book about how television is used to manipulate & propagandize the American people. I took a look at the book, and he doesn't divulge how he used television to manipulate the American people regarding the RFK assassination. Lol We will see just how adept he was at mass media propaganda and manipulation.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

7. Frank went on to head National Public Radio, NPR, for 6 years. During his tenure, he increased that propaganda operation to 281 stations and tripled the listenership. https://t.co/4aYQbjCT7t

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

8/ But Frank's "magnum opus" was his PR work for the film "JFK," surely one of the greatest propaganda efforts ever committed to celluloid. The movie was written, produced & directed by jеws--and blames the CIA & military industrial complex for the JFK assassination. Not one word about israel, Mossad or nukes.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Kennedy called for budget cuts to military installations and wanted to end the Cold War, cooperate with the Soviets on the moon race, ban nuclear testing, avoid invading Cuba, and withdraw from Vietnam. By 1961, some knew Kennedy wouldn't escalate war in Southeast Asia. Kennedy told McNamara he would pull advisors from Vietnam, angering some who felt betrayed after Laos. Kennedy questioned why the US should go into Vietnam if Cuba was too close, leading to conflict. Defense spending was escalating, with projections of nearly $200 billion spent since the war began. The Kennedy brothers allegedly targeted voting districts with defense contracts to influence the '64 election. Some wanted to control intelligence from Saigon and manage McNamara's influence on Kennedy. The plan may have started with conversations among defense contractors, big oil bankers, and military officers. The goal was to create a plan, likely in the South, with no direct orders or written evidence, ensuring plausible deniability. The operation had to succeed, regardless of the cost, with perpetrators protected from prosecution. This was described as a coup d'etat.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And don't underestimate the budget cuts that Kennedy called for a March of '63 or either. Nearly 52 military installations in 25 states, 21 overseas bases. You're talking big money. You know how many helicopters have lost in Vietnam? Nearly 3,000 so far. Who makes that? Bell helicopter. Who owns Bell? Well, Bell was nearly bankrupt when the First National Bank of Boston approached the CIA about developing helicopter for Indochina usage. How about the f one eleven fighter? General Dynamics of Fort Worth, Texas. Who owns that? Find out the defense budget since the war began. '75 going on a hundred billion. Nearly 200,000,000,000 will be spent before it's over. In 1949, it was 10,000,000,000. No war. No money. The organizing principle of any society, mister Garrison, is for war. The authority of the state over its people resides in its war powers. And Kennedy wanted to end the Cold War in his second term. He wanted to call out the moon race in favor of cooperation with the Soviets. He signed a treaty with the Soviets to ban nuclear testing. He refused to invade Cuba in 1962, and he set out to withdraw from Vietnam. All of that ended on the twenty second November nineteen sixty three. As early as 1961, they knew Kennedy was not going to go to war in South East Asia. Like Caesar, he is surrounded by enemies and something's underway, but it has no face. Yet everybody in the loop knows. Speaker 1: You could forget about your combat troops. He told McNamara, he is gonna pull out the goddamn advisers. He fucked us in Laos, and now he is gonna fuck us in goddamn Vietnam. He won't implement it before the election. He can't afford to. I hear the NSC meeting was a real barn burner. I wouldn't have missed it for the world. Heads are gonna roll everywhere. Did you hear what Lemnitzer did? What happened? Kennedy tried to rub Lem's nose and shit, saying if we didn't go into Cuba, which is so close, why should we go into Vietnam, which is so far away? Speaker 0: Son of a bitch. Speaker 1: There he goes again. He's got his hands on the chicken switch. Anyway, Lem said that the chiefs still think we ought to go into Cuba. Speaker 0: Money's a stake. Big money. Hundred billion dollars. Kennedy brothers target voting districts for those defense dollars. They give TFX fighter contracts only to those counties that are gonna make a difference in '64 and the people in the loop. They fight back their way. Speaker 1: We have to control the intelligence from Saigon. Speaker 2: Well, just don't let McNamara start sticking his damn nose in this thing. Every time he goes over to Saigon on some fucking fact finding mission, he comes back and just scares the shit out of the president. Now I won't Max Taylor on him night and day like a fly on shit. Now you control McNamara, and you control Kennedy. Speaker 0: I think it started like that in the wind. Defense contractors, big oil bankers, just conversations, nothing more. Then a call is made, maybe to someone like my superior officer, General Wine. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: We're going. We need your help. Speaker 1: When? In Speaker 0: the fall, probably in the South. We want you to come up with a plan. Speaker 1: I can do that. Speaker 0: Everything is singularized. No one has said he must die. There's been no vote. Nothing's on paper. There's no one to blame. It's as old as the crucifixion, a military firing squad. Five bullets, one blank. No one's guilty because everyone on the power structure knows anything has a plausible deniability. There are no compromising connections except at the most secret point. But what's paramount is that it must succeed no matter how many die, no matter how much it costs, the perpetrators must be on the winning side and never subject to prosecution for anything by anyone. That is a coup d'etat.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

9/ In "JFK: The Documented Screenplay," Frank Mankiewicz vigorously defends the film against its vicious attacks in the press, led by the jewish New York Times. This is kosher theater of the highest order, a real kosher sandwich--designed to elevate the film. The public was herded into one of two camps: Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone, or the CIA/MIC conspiracy did it. No room for israel in this artificial dialectic.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

10/ Before I continue, if you'd like to support my work--or you find it of value--I have buymeacoffee, CashApp, Venmo, PayPal & crypto. Twitter demonetized me, so I'm not being compensated for this work except by your generosity. Flow.page/SamParkerSenate

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

11/ Let's stay on "JFK," and shift our focus to its producer, Arnon Milchan--who, it turns out--was an israeli spy & nuclear weapons trafficker since the 1960s, critical to helping israel build its nuclear program. https://t.co/uwsBpJQGTm

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 recalls asking someone, presumably a friend, about something. The friend responded that he was Israeli and would do certain things for his country. Speaker 0 notes that this got the person into big trouble. Speaker 1 says he accepted the answer, almost.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know that the years that you were doing King of Comedy and Once Upon a Time in America were perhaps the most dramatic years for him Yes. In that respect. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Did you notice anything back then? Speaker 1: I did ask him once we spoke about something and he told me that he was an Israeli and that he and that he of course would do these things for his country. There's something with the little the little the things that trigger us I some point that I had asked Arnold about that. Being friends, I was curious but not in an accusatory way, just wanted know. And he he said, yeah. I'm I'm Israeli. That's my country. Know. Speaker 0: This got him into big trouble. Speaker 1: Yeah. And I and and he gave me that answer, and I and I accepted it. Almost. Almost. Yeah.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

12/ Finally, in December 2023, Oliver Stone admitted to the clash between JFK & israel regarding nuclear weapons. Why didn't he or Milchan address this in their "JFK" movie? 60 years late, Stone. https://t.co/2PvNdb6iH0

Video Transcript AI Summary
John Kennedy opposed Israel obtaining nuclear weapons and prevented it. He intended to make inspections very rigid, particularly concerning the Des Moines facility. After Kennedy's assassination, Lyndon Johnson allegedly allowed Israel to proceed, and the Des Moines facility opened in 1968. Johnson directed people not to discuss it, and some Americans are unaware that Israel possesses nuclear weapons illegally. Kennedy believed allowing Israel to have the bomb was wrong, but Johnson secretly aided Israel, despite them not helping the U.S. in the Middle East. Kennedy was against colonialism, viewing Israel as an apartheid state, and his opposition led to his assassination.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you know that John Kennedy was very much opposed to Israel getting them bombed? He he nixed it. Absolutely nixed it. He did not. And he was coming over to make the inspections very rigid. And the the they were building the the factory, the at Des Moines. That was a big issue. Kennedy was killed. Lyndon Johnson signed off and let the Israelis do what they want. They opened the Des Moines facility in 1968. Americans didn't even know because Johnson put out a directive. He said, don't talk about it. So to this day, I mean, Americans, some of them don't even know that the that they they illegally have the nuclear bomb. So that complicates the whole issue. Jack Kennedy was right. He was the last president who made sense, really made sense. And he said, we don't give them the bomb. The bomb was was sacred. The sacred the first five countries that got it, that was that was done. It was a fait accompli. But all of a sudden to allow Israel to have a bomb, no. No way in hell. That was the beginning of it. And, he was killed. But, Johnson was, secretly abetting Israel and saying they're our allies and, they haven't helped us one iota in the Middle East. The world hates us. That's not the country I grew up in. It's not the country. We know the difference. We knew the difference between right and wrong. This is clear. But definitely there was malice, a forethought in getting rid of Kennedy. And because they saw the danger that he represented, the change that he would have brought to the world. He he was against colonialism, and in a sense, his colonialism in Israel is an apartheid state. It's brown people, who are being killed. It's a form of another colonialism.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

13/ But it's not just Oliver Stone & Arnon Milchan. There's been a concerted effort for years to pin the murder of RFK on the Palestinian Sirhan Sirhan. For example, multiple articles on the 40th anniversary in 2008 reinforced the conventional narrative. In these articles by jеwish journalists, Sirhan's assassination plot is claimed to establish Arab/Muslim terrorism, is likened to 9/11 (another fake flag! Lol), and again repeats the talking points about the 6-Day War & Sirhan's hatred of israel.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

14/ NEW CHARACTER ALERT: JERRY COHEN But where did these talking points come from? How were they originally established? All the way back on the day of RFK's death: June 6th, 1968. On the front page of the morning edition of the Los Angeles Times on June 6th--mere hours after RFK died--jеwish columnist Jerry Cohen announced to the world how Sirhan wanted to complete his anti-israel vendetta by the 1-year anniversary of the 6-Day War, and that RFK personified his "virulent anti-israel" hatred.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

15/ Let's take a closer look at Jerry Cohen: ▪️Was found dead in his home in early 1993 of an apparent suicide. ▪️Was once a journalist in New Orleans ▪️Covered the trial of Clay Shaw, the man investigated by Jim Garrison for involvement in the assassination of JFK--the very case and character upon which the film "JFK" was based! Just tell me that's not one hell of a COHENcidence.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

16/ Side-Bar: Jerry Cohen also covered the Charles Manson-Sharon Tate/La Bianca murders, helping set that narrative cover-up, which is only recently beginning to be revealed in Tom O'Neill's "CHAOS" (2019). https://t.co/lMFgOplUH9

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

17/ NEW CHARACTER: LA Mayor Sam Yorty Circling back to RFK, where did Jerry Cohen get his narrative talking points on Sirhan Sirhan? As you can see from the newspaper article from June 6th a few tweets above, he says he got the information from the mayor of Los Angeles, Sam Yorty. Additionally, on June 5th & 6th, 1968, Mayor Yorty appeared in multiple televised press conferences wherein he used illegally obtained, and unauthenticated evidence (that the police hadn't even processed yet) to proclaim that Sirhan was a radical leftist communist, and that he was committed to killing RFK by the 1-year anniversary of the beginning of the 6-Day War. Sam Yorty was a long-time political enemy of the Kennedy family, and even though he was a fellow Democrat, he endorsed Nixon rather than JFK in 1960. In 1968, when RFK was running, he was again a Nixon supporter. The communist angle on Sirhan was later proven false. And I think it's time we call bullshit on the whole thing.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

18/ But it turns out that Mayor Yorty was even more proximately and intimately involved in the RFK shooting. Yorty literally urged RFK to end his victory speech only a few short minutes before Frank Mankiewicz shepherded RFK into the kitchen to be shot by Sirhan. Was Yorty a co-conspirator? Is this a smoking gun? Watch carefully:

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker thanks everyone present and acknowledges a message indicating the event has run long. They express gratitude and shift focus to Chicago, expressing a desire to win there.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I thank all of you, those of you who are here. Mary Mary Yordie has just sent me a message that we've been here too long already. So my thanks to all of you, and now it's on to Chicago, and let's win there. Thank you.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

19/ As I've written extensively before, the Vietnam War was a jewish plot to benefit israel (another deflection in the movie "JFK" in which it was asserted that the war was for the benefit of MIC. Which is true. But it left out the part about MIC supplying israel). One of the main reasons RFK withdrew his endorsement from LBJ and launched his own campaign for POTUS was his strong feelings against the Vietnam War and plans to end it.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

20/ JFK THE DAY BEFORE THE ASSASSINATION: "There’s no reason for us to lose another man over there. Vietnam is not worth another American life." - 11/21/1963 JFK had drafted a national security memo (NSAM-263), dated October 11, 1963, calling for US withdrawal from Vietnam. LBJ replaced this memo with his own (NSAM-273) just 1 day after JFK's funeral, calling for a massive escalation in Vietnam. Another motive for israel's assassination of him.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

21/ As I've also reported previously, one of the main motives behind the MLK Jr. assassination was *HIS* opposition to the Vietnam War. MLK gave his famous speech announcing his formal opposition to the war on April 4th, 1967. He was assassinated exactly one year later on April 4th, 1968. Reminiscent of RFK getting assassinated on the 1-year anniversary of the launch of the 6-Day War, no? Notice who came out against MLK for his anti-war stance: ▪️NAACP (✡️) ▪️New York Times (✡️) ▪️Washington Post (✡️) ▪️Ralph Bunche, winner of the 1950 Nobel Peace Prize for helping negotiate the settlement between Israel & the Arabs--done so mostly while shooting pool with israeli IDF Commander Moshe Dayan! Try not to notice that the MLK Jr. assassination also hinged on a lone gunman patsy who was also set up. Are you noticing the patterns, yet?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

22/ Here's RFK's impromptu MLK reaction speech on April 4th, 1968, just hours after the assassination of MLK Jr. Almost exactly 2 months later, RFK would be shot, too. https://t.co/3oD32PLuXm

Video Transcript AI Summary
Martin Luther King was shot and killed in Memphis. King dedicated his life to love and justice. The speaker asks what kind of nation the U.S. is and what direction it wants to move in. Black people may feel bitterness, hatred, and a desire for revenge, potentially leading to greater polarization. Alternatively, the country can follow King's example by understanding and replacing violence with compassion and love. The speaker says they can feel the same kind of hatred, as a member of their family was killed by a white man. The U.S. needs to move beyond these difficult times and seek love, wisdom, and compassion, not division, hatred, violence, or lawlessness. The speaker quotes Aeschylus, saying that even in despair, wisdom comes through the grace of God. The vast majority of people want to live together, improve life, and achieve justice. The speaker urges dedication to taming the savageness of man and prays for the country and its people.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did they know about Martin Luther King? We have, we have left it up. Hope that it could be handled. And I saw it. Could you lower those signs, please? I have some very sad news for all of you, and that is that Martin Luther King was shot and was killed tonight in Memphis. Martin Luther King dedicated his life to love and to justice between fellow human beings. He died in the cause of that effort. In this difficult day, in this difficult time for The United States, it's perhaps well to ask what kind of a nation we are and what direction we want to move in. For those of you who are black, considering the evidence evidently is that there were white people who were responsible, you can be filled with bitterness and with hatred and a desire for revenge. We can move in that direction as a country and greater polarization, black people amongst blacks and white amongst whites filled with hatred toward one another. Or we can make an effort as Martin Luther King did to understand and to comprehend and replace that violence, that stain of bloodshed that is spread across our land with an effort to understand and compassion and love. For those of you who are black and are tempted to fill with be filled with hatred and mistrust of the injustice of such an act against all white people. I would only say that I can also feel in my own heart the same kind of feeling. I had a member of my family killed, but he was killed by a white man. But we have to make an effort in The United States. We have to make an effort to understand, to get beyond or go beyond these rather difficult times. My favorite poem, my my favorite poet was Aeschylus. And he once wrote, even in our heart until in our own despair against our will comes wisdom through the awful grace of God. What we need in The United States is not division. What we need in The United States is not hatred. What we need in The United States is not violence and lawlessness, but is love and wisdom and compassion toward one another, feeling of justice toward those who still suffer within our country, whether they be white or whether they be black. We can do well in this country. We will have difficult times. We've had difficult times in the past, but we will and we will have difficult times in the future. It is not the end of violence. It is not the end of lawlessness, and it's not the end of disorder. But the vast majority of white people and the vast majority of black people in this country want to live together, want to improve the quality of our life, and want justice for all human beings that abide in our land with ourselves to what the Greeks wrote so many years ago to tame the savageness of man and make gentle the life of this world. Let us dedicate ourselves to that and say a prayer for our country and for our people. Thank you very much.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

23/ That takes us back to June 5th, 1968. Sirhan Sirhan still maintains his innocence, and claims he can't remember anything about that night. Doctors and experts have questioned & examined him over the years, and some are convinced that he was under hypnosis, or brainwashing. MK-Ultra type of stuff.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

24/ In Ronen Bergman's "Rise And Kill First: The Secret History Of Israel's Targeted Assassinations," he reveals an israeli plot--hatched in May 1968--to brainwash a Palestinian prisoner and use him as a lone gunman to assassinate Yasser Arafat. That's May 1968--just days before RFK was shot by the mentally deranged (at the time) Palestinian Sirhan Sirhan in an apparent perfect setup to make israel look like a sympathetic victim. Do you see what's happening here?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

25/ If RFK had won the presidency, he'd have re-opened the investigation into the JFK assassination *AND* ended the Vietnam War. One can only surmise how catastrophic this would have been for israel and the jewish lobby. Instead, they got away with it, and it's been catastrophic for the United States, and the Middle East. This is the real story of JFK, RFK & MLK.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the Jews were responsible for the deaths of the three Kennedys. They allege the "international clique of the sick and wicked" and the Dallas Citizens Council were involved, with Jews creating a cover story through the Warren Commission. According to the speaker, Lee Harvey Oswald was not the mastermind, and Jack Rubenstein, who was Jewish, killed him. They claim Oliver Stone, Arne and Milsson, and Abraham Zapruder, who are Jewish, were involved in creating and disseminating a false narrative. The speaker states the magic bullet theory was impossible and created by Arlen Spector, who is Jewish, to cover up multiple shooters. The speaker alleges the assassination was a Mossad job because Kennedy refused to let Israel have nuclear powers and sided with the Palestinians. They claim RFK was also killed because he didn't believe the official story and would have exposed the truth if he became president.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When all three Kennedys died, they called it a curse. But the truth is the Jews put each one in a hearse, and there's nothing I say but truth in each verse. The Jews and their lies always make things worse. The international clique of the sick Speaker 1: and wicked, the Dallas Citizens Council are the ones who did this. Once done, the Jews made the moves and bore false witness and created the cover story with their war in commission. They blamed it only Harvey who was not the mastermind. He was shot and killed by the Jew Jack Rubenstein. Some Jews even tried to blame the Cubans for this crime, but the truth lies behind what made Ben Gurion resign. A Jew named Oliver Stone put out the movie JFK produced by the Jew Arne and Milsson to blame the CIA. The Jew who filmed Kennedy getting his head blown off that day was Abraham Zapruder who sold it for 150 k. The magic bullet theory was physically impossible. It's why LBJ had Kennedy's body stolen from the hospital. It was created by Juarl and Spector and spread like gospel to cover up the fact that there were multiple hostiles. Speaker 0: When all three Kennedys died, they called it a curse. But the truth is the Jews put each one in a hearse. And there's nothing I say, but truth in each verse. The Jews and their lies always make things worse. When all three Kennedys died, they called it a curse. But the truth is the Jews put each one in a hearse. And there's nothing I say but truth in each verse. The Jews and their lies always make things worse. They found a sniper nest Speaker 1: and some pruers, Daltex HQ. There's no chance all this just randomly leads back to Jews. This was a Mossad job to kill a US President that refused to let Israel have nuclear powers that they would abuse. Kennedy also sided with the Palestinians and their plight. He was supportive of Nasser who also put up a fight. The point is all Kennedy wanted to do was make things right, but the Jews couldn't risk it and exercise their might. These are the real reasons. JFK was killed. It had nothing to do with ending the fair silver dollar bill. It had everything to do with him refusing to break his will. And this caused the Jews to kill our president with their shields. And just to be safe, they had to kill RFK because they knew he didn't believe what happened on that day. And if he became president, he would have found out their play. So they hired Eugene and Speaker 0: Caesar to make him go away. When all three Kennedys died, they called it a curse. But the truth is the Jews put each one in a hearse. And there's nothing I say, but truth in each verse. The Jews and their lies always make things worse. When all three Kennedys died, they called it a curse, but the truth is the Jews put each one in a hearse, and there's nothing I say, but truth in each verse. The Jews and their lies always make things worse.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

26/If you got this far, please consider supporting me as this was an immense amount of work. I'm demonetized here on X, so the only way I can keep doing this is if you support me directly BuyMeACoffee, Venmo, PayPal, CashApp & crypto all available. Thx! Flow.page/SamParkerSenate

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

27/ Here are some of my threads explaining how the Vietnam War was a jewish plot for israel. https://t.co/JafvQyHgWG

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

1/ THE VIETNAM WAR WAS A JЕWISH PLOT, PART 3: "JFK" THE MOVIE. Memorial Day Rage Edition. People are starting to become aware that the movie "JFK" was a sophisticated piece of propaganda that deflected blame for the assassination of JFK away from israel and onto the CIA, the DOD & the Military Industrial Complex (MIC). Pretty much anyone who wasn't israel or jеws. It was produced by the israeli spy & nuclear weapons smuggler Arnon Milchan, Directed by Oliver Stone (jеw), written by Zachary Sklar (jеw), and promoted by RFK's press secretary Frank Mankiewicz (jеwish member of the ADL, responsible for directing RFK into the pantry where Sirhan Sirhan was waiting in June 1968). The movie famously covers up israel's quest for nuclear weapons & JFK's desire to stop it, his efforts to register the jеwish lobby as a foreign agent under FARA, and his promotion of UN Resolution 194 calling for Palestinian Right Of Return. Finally, while it mentions that JFK wanted to exit Vietnam, it omits that he also didn't want to pursue any extensive arms buildup for israel, denying it all offensive weapons and missiles. LBJ reversed all of those policies almost immediately after the assassination--including JFK's planned exit from Vietnam. But the movie also covers up something else through another "limited hangout": that one of the strategic purposes of the Vietnam War wasn't just to make money for the American war machine, but to also build up the war machine to be able to supply israel with the intelligence, armaments & other military capabilities sufficient to overcome its enemies. Without the intelligence, armaments & weapons America supplied to israel throughout the course of the Vietnam War (1964-1973), it's possible israel wouldn't have prevailed in the 1967 6-Day War and absolutely certain it wouldn't have survived the 1973 Yom Kippur War. And without the defense buildup of the American war industry stemming from the Vietnam War, America wouldn't have the capacity to supply israel with those necessary armaments to win. In this way, israel was the top beneficiary of the Vietnam War--just like the War On Terror! Vietnam didn't benefit. America didn't benefit. But israel did. Funny how that keeps happening. This is the other secret agenda that the "JFK" movie obscured. You ever wonder why the Vietnam War wasn't fought to be won and why it just kept pointlessly grinding on? It's because the real point was to keep the War Machine at maximum capacity for israel while the US treaded water in the war effort. Watch this "conspiracy" scene from "JFK" now and see how clever & devious their propaganda is. Note how many truths it blends in with made-up bullsh*t to go along with the glaring omissions. My favorite part is where Donald Sutherland references the crucifixion! Was this a sly tip of the hand that the jеws were behind the assassination? Or maybe it was a nod to well-known jеwish propaganda that the Romans killed Christ--similar to how they allege the CIA killed JFK? Either way, it's eyebrow-raising. The final credits scene drives it all home: it suggests Vietnam was fought for the enrichment of the Military Industrial Complex--which is partially true, but it leaves out the part where that buildup was of crucial benefit and existential necessity to israel. Notably absent from the Vietnam angle in the movie is any mention of Arthur Goldberg, the jеwish UN ambassador who defended US intervention in Vietnam on the world stage; Walt Rostow, the jеwish National Security Advisor & architect of the war; and Eugene Rostow, the jеwish Undersecretary of State who championed the Vietnam war & defended its legal basis. Nor does it mention how Eugene conceived the Warren Commission or was responsible for getting the Mossad-compromised Allen Dulles onto it. Finally, it says nothing about how virtually the entire State Department was completely taken over by zionists. The fact is, a major motive behind the Vietnam War was to help supply israel. And that fact has remain hidden until now, partially due to propaganda like this. Try not to be enraged this Memorial Day as you realize our boys died in Vietnam for jеws & israel.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Kennedy called for budget cuts to military installations and wanted to end the Cold War, cooperate with the Soviets on the moon race, ban nuclear testing, avoid invading Cuba, and withdraw from Vietnam. Some knew as early as 1961 that Kennedy wouldn't escalate war in Southeast Asia. Kennedy told McNamara he would pull advisors from Vietnam after Laos. He questioned why the US should go into Vietnam when Cuba was closer. Some felt Kennedy was interfering with defense spending, targeting voting districts with defense contracts. To control Kennedy, McNamara needed to be controlled. The plan started with conversations among defense contractors, big oil bankers, and others. A superior officer was asked for help to create a plan, likely in the South. The plan was singularized with no direct orders or paper trail, ensuring plausible deniability. The goal was to succeed at any cost, with perpetrators never facing prosecution. This was described as a coup d'etat.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And don't underestimate the budget cuts that Kennedy called for a March of '63 or either. Nearly 52 military installations in 25 states, 21 overseas bases. You're talking big money. You know how many helicopters have lost in Vietnam? Nearly 3,000 so far. Who makes that? Bell helicopter. Who owns Bell? Well, Bell was nearly bankrupt when the First National Bank of Boston approached the CIA about developing helicopter for Indochina usage. How about the f one eleven fighter? General Dynamics of Fort Worth, Texas. Who owns that? Find out the defense budget since the war began. '75 going on a hundred billion. Nearly 200,000,000,000 will be spent before it's over. In 1949, it was 10,000,000,000. No war. No money. The organizing principle of any society, mister Garrison, is for war. The authority of the state over its people resides in its war powers. And Kennedy wanted to end the Cold War in his second term. He wanted to call out the moon race in favor of cooperation with the Soviets. He signed a treaty with the Soviets to ban nuclear testing. He refused to invade Cuba in 1962, and he set out to withdraw from Vietnam. All of that ended on the twenty second November nineteen sixty three. As early as 1961, they knew Kennedy was not going to go to war in South East Asia. Like Caesar, he is surrounded by enemies and something's underway, but it has no face. Yet everybody in the loop knows. Speaker 1: You could forget about your combat troops. He told McNamara, he is gonna pull out the goddamn advisers. He fucked us in Laos, and now he is gonna fuck us in goddamn Vietnam. He won't implement it before the election. He can't afford to. I hear the NSC meeting was a real barn burner. I wouldn't have missed it for the world. Heads are gonna roll everywhere. Did you hear what Lemnitzer did? What happened? Kennedy tried to rub Lem's nose and shit, saying if we didn't go into Cuba, which is so close, why should we go into Vietnam, which is so far away? Speaker 0: Son of a bitch. Speaker 1: There he goes again. He's got his hands on the chicken switch. Anyway, Lem said that the chiefs still think we ought to go into Cuba. Speaker 0: Money's a stake. Big money. Hundred billion dollars. Kennedy brothers target voting districts for those defense dollars. They give TFX fighter contracts only to those counties that are gonna make a difference in '64 and the people in the loop. They fight back their way. Speaker 1: We have to control the intelligence from Saigon. Speaker 2: Well, just don't let McNamara start sticking his damn nose in this thing. Every time he goes over to Saigon on some fucking fact finding mission, he comes back and just scares the shit out of the president. Now I won't Max Taylor on him night and day like a fly on shit. Now you control McNamara, and you control Kennedy. Speaker 0: I think it started like that in the wind. Defense contractors, big oil bankers, just conversations, nothing more. Then a call is made, maybe to someone like my superior officer, General Wine. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: We're going. We need your help. Speaker 1: When? In Speaker 0: the fall, probably in the South. We want you to come up with a plan. Speaker 1: I can do that. Speaker 0: Everything is singularized. No one has said he must die. There's been no vote. Nothing's on paper. There's no one to blame. It's as old as the crucifixion, a military firing squad. Five bullets, one blank. No one's guilty because everyone on the power structure knows anything has a plausible deniability. There are no compromising connections except at the most secret point. But what's paramount is that it must succeed no matter how many die, no matter how much it costs, the perpetrators must be on the winning side and never subject to prosecution for anything by anyone. That is a coup d'etat.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

VIETNAM PLOT CONTINUED: Eugene Rostow Exposed Today, I will show you more connections to the Vietnam War as a jеwish plot, and show how it links to the JFK assassination. Our subject: Eugene Rostow. Less than 2 days after the JFK assassination, Eugene Rostow--Russian jеw, Dean https://t.co/ru758CoHde

Video Transcript AI Summary
Bill Moyers and Dean Eugene Rostow spoke on the phone on November 24, 1963. Rostow suggested that a presidential commission of distinguished, bipartisan citizens be appointed to investigate President Kennedy's murder, as world and American opinion distrust the Dallas police's handling of the situation. Rostow suggested members like Tom Dewey, Bill Story, or Nixon, excluding Supreme Court justices. Moyers suggested Rostow provide a memorandum for the president, emphasizing the breakdown of respect for law and order in the country. He said the president could use it in private talks with newsmen or for his joint session next Wednesday night. Moyers wanted the president to reassure the world that America is a land of public order, civility, and guaranteed public safety. Rostow agreed to send a memo right away. Moyers said he would pass on the commission suggestion to the president.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Telephone conversation between Bill Moyers and Dean Eugene Rostow on 11/24/1963. Time unknown. Speaker 1: Talk to you. Thank you, boy. I'm if I can help in any way, I will. I'm calling with a suggestion. I've just talked to Nick Katzenbach. Yes. And the poor fellow, he has so much of a burden on him. Yes. Talked to him about three times today. And he just sounded so groggy that I thought I'd pass this thought along to you. And, of course, I realize how tough it must be now for the president. In this situation with this bastard killed, my suggestion is that a presidential commission be appointed a very distinguished citizen in the very near future, bipartisan and above politics. No Supreme Court justices, but people like Tom Dewey and, know, Bill Story from Texas. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: So on. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: A commission of seven or nine people, maybe Nixon, I don't know Right. To look into the whole affair of the murder of the president. Mhmm. Because world opinion and American opinion is just now so shaken by the behavior of the Dallas police that they're not believing anything. Speaker 0: That's I can understand that. Speaker 1: Now I've got a party here. We've I've been pursuing the the policy, you know, that people need to come together at this time. Speaker 0: You know what you could do that would be very helpful? And this is a this is a good suggestion, and I'll pass it on just a minute. The president's calling. Speaker 1: Hello? Yes, sir. Yes, sir. Speaker 0: Excuse me. Go ahead. Sure, Bill. Speaker 1: What can I do to go help? Speaker 0: Well, was just thinking coming in a few minutes ago after hearing the news of Hawesville shooting that this is symptomatic of what has been happening into this country in the last few years and the breakdown of respect for law and order, know, that the the signs impeach the supreme court, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. If I could have a memorandum to give to the president along these lines, if one of his great tasks is to help, you know, continue the institutions that seem to be, at least, if not in doubt right now, at least, weakened by some kind of sickness that has taken hold of some parts of our population. I'd like him to to to to have that to consider in in some private talks he's having with newsmen and with perhaps for his joint session next Wednesday night. He needs to make some point, you know, that America is known as a land of public order, a land of civility, a land of in which the public safety is guaranteed. And there's a very serious question right now in the mind of the world about these institutions that undergird us so tremendously. Speaker 1: His Gettysburg speech last spring was just terrific. It hasn't been better. Yes. I'll be glad to send any memo Right away. Speaker 0: Alright. Now your suggestion is that he appoint a special commission of distinguished Americans, primarily in the field of law, I presume, to look into the whole question of the assassination. Speaker 1: That's right. Alright. Report on it. Speaker 0: Alright. I'll get that to him also. I wish you would keep me informed about how Nick is is doing. We don't wanna put any greater strain on him than is necessary. But Speaker 1: Well, he's a great man. Utmost faith in him. Yes. He's he's fighting back. Alright. Terrific strength. Speaker 0: Thanks for calling. I'll I'll follow through. Speaker 1: Alright. Speaker 0: Goodbye.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@TruthArchiveAI save thread

HealthRanger
Posted - September 12, 2025 at 4:09 AM
Saved - September 12, 2025 at 5:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The video shows the rifle was planted. There's no rifle when the "shooter" jumps off the roof, which raises questions about the setup. The incorrectly mounted scope and the sudden appearance of "trans" inscriptions suggest a deliberate misdirection by the FBI.

@HealthRanger - HealthRanger

The rifle was planted. This video proves it. No rifle when the "shooter" jumps off the roof. That's why the rifle makes no sense, why the scope is mounted incorrectly and why "trans" inscriptions were magically found on the rifle. This entire thing is a setup. You are being misdirected on purpose by the FBI. As usual.

@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter

So if the rifle was ditched in the woods why doesnt he have it when he jumps off the roof. https://t.co/0Kxfr5DqOQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
As he does, he's gonna climb off the edge and then drop down to the ground. As he did that, he left some palm impressions. There's some smudges, some some places we're looking to collect DNA. There's a shoe imprint where we believe the suspect is clearly identified as wearing Converse tennis shoes. Again, we'll replay that again so you can get another view of that. It's important to note his black t shirt, his black pants, and though there is appears to be some white on the soles of those Converse tennis shoes. Those are all identifiable items that we're looking for. In the stills that are gonna
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As he does, he's gonna climb off the edge and then drop down to the ground. As he did that, he left some palm impressions. There's some smudges, some some places we're looking to collect DNA. There's a shoe imprint where we believe the suspect is clearly identified as wearing Converse tennis shoes. Again, we'll replay that again so you can get another view of that. It's important to note his black t shirt, his black pants, and though there is appears to be some white on the soles of those Converse tennis shoes. Those are all identifiable items that we're looking for. In the stills that are gonna
aldamu_jo
Posted - September 19, 2025 at 11:30 AM
Saved - September 19, 2025 at 7:58 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Charlie was assassinated using a modified camera, with the bullet entering above his left ear and exiting below his right neck, indicating a precise trajectory. The sophistication of this method suggests a calculated execution. The bullet's path aligns perfectly with the modified camera, likely fired from a distance. Shortly after the assassination, the camera was removed, pointing to an effort to conceal evidence.

@aldamu_jo - Irlandarra

Charlie was assassinated with a modified camera. Looking at the camera position and seeing the trajectory of the bullet ( video below) tells us that the bullet was fired from that camera, entering above his left ear and exiting below his right neck. The sophistication of the action tells us who did it.

@aldamu_jo - Irlandarra

Bullet trajectory that matches exactly as if it were fired with the modified camera, possibly at a distance. https://t.co/EnSOk4Q9mk

@aldamu_jo - Irlandarra

The camera is removed immediately after the assassination to cover up evidence. https://t.co/MWrLFi6Gp3

Video Transcript AI Summary
Safety team is on the scene. I just heard them say 'the active shooter Charlie Kirk has been shot.' 'Charlie Kirk got hit' is what the security detail just said. A message from the speaker's son said, 'My son just messaged me and says that Charlie Kirk I believe you need to leave.' Earlier, the speaker asked, 'Is this not fireworks? Sir, please sir. Hey.' The transcript depicts a security response to reported harm to Charlie Kirk, with the speaker relaying what the security detail reported and noting a directive for Charlie Kirk to leave. The tone conveys urgency and uncertainty.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is this not fireworks? Sir, please sir. Hey. Safety team is here. I just heard them say the active shooter Charlie Kirk has been shot. Charlie Kirk got hit is what the what the security detail just said. My son just messaged me and says that Charlie Kirk I believe you need to leave.
The1Parzival
Posted - September 20, 2025 at 6:18 PM
Saved - September 26, 2025 at 10:19 PM

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

💡💡💡 - The current narrative is completely falling apart. - People are quickly realizing that there is no way a 30-06 was used, which I was saying from the beginning. - When this narrative officially crumbles the backlash is going to be epic, get your popcorn ready. 🍿🍿🍿 https://t.co/0RWYwRH8aq

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

🤠🤠🤠 - Looks like Nick Fuentes is having a meltdown and a hard time accepting that the narrative we have been told isn't what actually happened. - This narrative is beginning to crumble more each day and it's only a matter of time until the truth comes out. 🤔🤔🤔 https://t.co/SejCHg7hfP

@ImperiumFirst - 𝐆𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐚𝐥𝐝𝐮𝐬

Nick makes fun of losers who believe in Charlie Kirk conspiracy theories 🤣

Video Transcript AI Summary
There’s a theory that 'he got shot with a palm pistol from the side or that there was a guy giving hand signals to kill Kirk in front of the livestream.' The event was livestreamed, and the speaker says their 'master plan in front of an audience of thousands that are all filming in front of a livestream was to have the shot caller next to Kill him. Kill him now. Take the shot now.' They question whether the thousands in attendance would 'recall I hope no one notices this,' asking, 'like, that was their plan?' The plan allegedly included 'a palm pistol like this' and to choreograph it 'in front of all the cameras' to be 'kill him. Kill him.' The speaker adds, 'the level of retardation' and notes 'schizos' as context for why 'no one wants to say it.'
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I love that. Well, I love the, I love the theory that he got shot with a palm pistol from the side or that there was a guy giving hand signals to kill Kirk in front of the livestream. It's a livestreamed event. So they're you're telling me their master plan in front of an audience of thousands that are all filming in front of a livestream was to have the shot caller next to Kill him. Kill him now. Take the shot now. I hope the thousands of people in attendance aren't recall I hope no one notices this. Like, that was their plan? Like, you're in front of thousands of people recording it with their phone, in front of giant cameras recording it, and their plan was kill him. Kill him. The other guy had a palm pistol like this. So the plan was in front of all the cameras to be like, and hope no one saw, choreograph it so it's like that's the level of retardation. But no one wants to say it because they're afraid of the schizos.
BasedSamParker
Posted - September 25, 2025 at 7:11 PM
Saved - September 26, 2025 at 6:19 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In my recent posts, I explored the conspiracy theories surrounding the assassination of Charlie Kirk, drawing parallels to historical assassinations like JFK, RFK, and MLK. I outlined similarities such as the presence of a lone gunman, inconsistencies in eyewitness accounts, and alleged Jewish involvement. I suggested that Charlie might be seen as more valuable dead than alive, speculating on potential motives linked to Jewish supremacy. I encouraged readers to share their thoughts on these parallels and the broader implications of the event.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

THE CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION CONSPIRACIES: ARE YOU JUST SEEING THINGS? One of the reasons people suspect a conspiracy behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk—including even a possible israeli/jewish role—is because they see similarities with other high profile assassinations that involved conspiracies with israel/jewish elements, like JFK's. But until now, nobody has really systematically listed these parallels. Here's my first attempt. What parallels do you see between these and the Charlie Kirk assassination? What did I miss? Are these parallels enough to justify having these conspiracy suspicions about Charlie's assassination? Or are we just seeing things? ▪️JFK▪️ 1. Lone gunman patsy ("Communist" Lee Harvey Oswald) 2. Shot in head in front of a crowd of people 3. Big event (Trip to Dallas, Parade, etc) 4. Irregularities & inconsistencies between eyewitness observed details of the shooting and the officially approved narrative of the shooting (TSBD vs DalTex vs Grassy Knoll; kill shot from front or back?) 5. "Magic" bullet theory 6. Medical report inconsistencies & subterfuge (botched autopsy, conflicting testimony, records tampering) 7. Straightforward jewish involvement (Dallas Citizens Council, led by jews, invited JFK to Dallas) 8. Weird jewish angle (Jack Ruby murders Lee Harvey Oswald) 9. LHO left behind notorious trail of documentary evidence, some of which may have been faked 10. Wanted to end Vietnam involvement (Vietnam was a war promoted by jews that benefited israel) 11. Tried to register AIPAC (AZC) under FARA 12. Was pro-israel, but also supported Palestinian Right of Return 13. Massive national event funeral with enormous crowds, television coverage, and powerful symbolism ▪️RFK▪️ 1. Lone gunman patsy ("Terrorist" Sirhan Sirhan) 2. Shot in head in front of a crowd of people 3. Big event (Just won the California Primary at Ambassador Hotel Celebration) 4. Irregularities & inconsistencies between eyewitness observed details of the shooting and the officially approved narrative of the shooting (Sirhan's shots came from the front & several feet away, while the death shots came from behind & close up; 10-13 shots heard vs only 8 bullets in Sirhan's gun) 5. "Magic" bullets & "Magic" shot (death bullets not a ballistics match for Sirhan's gun, kill shot came from behind, not the front) 6. Crime scene destroyed (the scene was not properly sealed allowing hundreds of people to pass through; key evidence such as the pantry door frames, ceiling tiles, and wood panels with possible bullet holes were destroyed or “lost” by the LAPD) 7. Autopsy report ignored (kill shots clearly came from behind, handwaved away at trial) 8. Weird jewish involvement (Press Secretary, Frank Mankiewicz—jewish member of the ADL—diverted RFK toward the pantry contrary to the prearranged exit through the ballroom) 9. jewish press first to establish the accepted narrative: that it was a case of Palestinian terrorism & hatred of israel (Jerry Cohen, LA Times) 10. Weird documentary evidence of the crime from the patsy (notes allegedly written by Sirhan confessing his plans to assassinate RFK; notebooks of Sirhan's writings used to paint his character to the public) 11. Wanted to end the Vietnam War (Vietnam was a war promoted by jews that benefited israel) 12. Tried to register AIPAC (AZC) under FARA 13. Supported right of israel to defend itself 14. Massive national event funeral with enormous crowds, television coverage, and powerful symbolism ▪️MLK▪️ 1. Lone gunman patsy ("Racist" James Earl Ray) 2. Shot in head in front of a group of people 3. Big Event (was in Memphis to support the Black sanitation workers' strike) 4. Irregularities & inconsistencies between eyewitness observed details of the shooting and the officially approved narrative of the shooting (some eyewitnesses say they heard shots from nearby bushes rather than the alleged boarding house) 5. "Magic" bullet (the fatal bullet failed the ballistics match to the rifle that was allegedly Ray's) 6. Crime scene destroyed immediately (within hours & into the next day, city workers cut down and cleared the brush where eyewitnesses placed a possible shooter, erasing any chance of testing whether a second shooter had been hidden there; bloody towels cleaned up; balcony not secured) 7. Cause of death/Autopsy inconsistency (multiple witnesses claim MLK was murdered while still alive at the hospital) 8. Weird jewish involvement (Ray's handler was a shadowy figure named Raul who was a known associate of Jack Ruby; Ray visited a jewish plastic surgeon the month before the assassination) 9. Weird israel angle (Ray assumed the identity of Eric Galt, the manager of a Union Carbide plant that manufactured bomb triggers for israel) 10. Straightforward jewish involvement (partnered with many jews and jewish organizations) 11. Wanted to end the Vietnam War (Vietnam was a war promoted by jews that benefited israel) 12. Had recently frustrated various jewish donors for his anti-war stance who turned on him and cut him off, to his consternation 13. Originally supported israel & scheduled a trip to visit, but then canceled it and began changing his views towards becoming more pro-Palestine 14. Massive national event funeral with enormous crowds, television coverage, and powerful symbolism 15. Death quickly and cynically exploited to get new laws passed that favored jewish agendas List the parallels you see to Charlie's assassination in the comments below. Let's crowd source.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2/ If your intuition says there's a larger plot involved in Charlie's assassination, but you're struggling to see the motive, I've laid out a case in this thread: https://t.co/HZAFJL9Qcr

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

1/ THE ELUSIVE MOTIVE: WAS CHARLIE KIRK WORTH MORE DEAD THAN ALIVE? Why Charlie Kirk's Strong Support For Zionism & Israel Might Not Be As Important As You Think. (🔖This thread) That's the central idea I will explain in this thread, and you must read it in its entirety to get the whole picture. DISCLAIMER: this is all highly speculative. It's way too early to possibly know anything for certainty. For example, it would have been impossible to understand or figure out israel's motives for assassinating JFK in the first 2 weeks afterward. However, because there's uncertainty, I believe it's important to keep an open mind, so let's play this scenario out. For many reasons, which I'll connect, it's possible to see Charlie as more valuable dead than alive from the perspective of jewish supremacy. And if it's possible to see it that way, then we have motive. Again: It's important to keep an open mind & read this thread all the way to the end to see all the interconnecting parts. And despite it being highly speculative, I think it's both coherent and plausible.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

3/ @AlsaceTX did exactly what I hoped someone would do. Bravo. https://t.co/1sHLdH4iLH https://t.co/kZSsBV7cX5

@alsacetx - AlsaceTX 🇺🇸🇬🇧

▪️Charlie Kirk ▪️ 1. Lone gunman patsy ("Leftist/Tranny" Tyler Robinson) 2. Shot in head in front of a group of people 3. Big Event (First stop on CK's new tour) 4. Irregularities & inconsistencies between eyewitness observed details of the shooting and the officially approved narrative of the shooting (eyewitness sees someone in tactical gear, 'shooter' changes clothes, picture at DQ 15 minutes after shooting) 5. "Magic" bullet (no bullet recovered, no ballistics, claims that a 30-.06 was magically stopped by CK's super neck) 6. Crime scene destroyed immediately (TP on video tampering with cameras, no crime scene walled off, completely gutted and paved over within 48 hours) 7. Cause of death/Autopsy inconsistency (no official autopsy report released, no official statements by medical personnel, 'surgeon' gives 'miracle bullet' stop anecdote through TPUSA and only one day after talk show says footage from the back shows no blood) 8. Weird Jewish involvement (Strange old Jewish guy causes diversion immediately shooting, says he did it, then is immediately disappeared under accusations of child porn. Same guy at multiple events: 9/11, Boston Marathon Bombing 9. Weird Israel angle (Israel head of state goes to social media to claim no involvement 2x in video messages within days of killing, Jewish press the first to announce his death. 10. Straightforward Jewish involvement (partnered with many Jews and Jewish organizations, multiple claims of pressure when his stance on Israel shifted slightly) 11. Outwardly opposed to war with Iran (Iran war promoted by Jews that benefited Israel) 12. Had recently frustrated various Jewish donors for his anti-war stance who turned on him and cut him off, to his consternation (multiple examples) 13. Originally supported israel, but began changing his views towards becoming more critical of Israeli actions in Palestine and war drums for Iran (hosted opposing views: Tucker & Dave Smith at his TPUSA event) 14. Massive national event funeral with enormous crowds, television coverage, and powerful symbolism 15. Death quickly and cynically exploited to get promote jewish agendas (pro-Israel take over of TPUSA, push for more censorship of Israeli criticism.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@Valembrossa47 🫡

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@ascetic_tweeter I think you meant to say Groyper, you dumbfuck bot https://t.co/TyxMpCafvb

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@Prussian_Ceph Sure thing, jewbot https://t.co/OP9uBWlSlU

HustleBitch_
Posted - September 30, 2025 at 8:48 PM
Saved - September 30, 2025 at 11:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discovered potential suspects in Charlie Kirk's assassination. At 12:15:18 PM, a man resembling the FBI's shooter, Tyler Robinson, was seen near Charlie's tent, acting suspiciously with a piece of fabric and planting something on the railing. Moments later, another individual interacted with that spot. Additionally, at 12:06 PM, another man was spotted on a nearby roof, and by 12:23 PM, footage showed a "shooter" fleeing another building. This sequence suggests a coordinated effort rather than random chaos, raising questions about the number of individuals involved.

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 I JUST FOUND CHARLIE KIRK'S ASSASSIN(S) 🚨 WATCH THIS VERY CLOSELY. At 12:15:18 PM outside the Sorensen Center, a man matching the FBI's shooter Tyler Robinson with black hat, maroon shirt, sunglasses, black backpack, is spotted directly overhead and in-line with Charlie's tent, possibly from where the bullet traveled. He’s holding a piece of fabric in his left hand, using it to cover his grip as he plants something on the railing. Seconds later, another figure suspiciously touches that exact spot, slips something into his pocket, then slams out three fist-bumps on the rail. THE SIGNAL. But of course, this isn’t the only sighting: • Just before this, at 12:06 PM, another man is seen on the roof of the Woodbury Building. • At 12:23 PM, the FBI’s footage shows a "shooter" running off the Losee roof. Three different buildings. Three different times. Same window of 17 minutes. This wasn’t chaos. This was choreography. So the question the FBI won’t touch: how many assassins were REALLY involved in Charlie Kirk’s death?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Look how look how tiny that is. Wow. It's my own DIY streaming setup. So it's professional ones, not like $5. Yeah. This is the mic right here. This is the receiver for this. Yeah. It's a it's half over that transmitter. Really? So that way, if I have multiple cameras, you don't miss any angle, you know. Who makes that camera? Logitech. Yeah. It's always an emphasis. It's a Levo. It's for the game. I have a big a bigger one at home that I like to bring out here. It's a pretty wide angle. It has a micro four thirds lens. Oh, it does? Yeah. It's that big. Yeah. It's like a cube, like this big.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look how look how tiny that is. Wow. It's my own DIY streaming setup. So it's professional ones, not like $5. Yeah. I just don't remember what that is. I've seen I've seen small ones, but I haven't seen them in some. This is the mic right here. This is the receiver for this. Yeah. It's a it's half over that transmitter. Really? So that way, if I have multiple cameras, you don't miss any angle, you know. Who makes that camera? Logitech. Yeah. It's always an emphasis. It's a Levo. It's for the game. I have a big a bigger one at home that I like to bring out here. It's a pretty wide angle. It has a micro four thirds lens. Oh, it does? Yeah. It's that big. Yeah. It's like a cube, like this big.
BasedSamParker
Posted - October 4, 2025 at 2:16 AM
Saved - October 5, 2025 at 1:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In my recent posts, I've explored the potential cover-up surrounding the assassination of Charlie Kirk, focusing on FBI Agent Robert Bohls, who was appointed shortly before the incident. I highlighted his background in coordinating investigations across multiple agencies, suggesting he could play a key role in managing a narrative. I examined the circumstances of Mehtab Syed's departure from the FBI and questioned the motives behind it. I also drew parallels between Kirk's assassination and those of JFK, RFK, and MLK, urging further investigation into these connections. Your thoughts are welcome.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

1/ CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION COVER-UP FOLLOW-UP (Disclaimer: this thread is for theorizing and research purposes only. None of this thread should be construed as a definitive assertion or accuasation. Do your own research.) How do you "manage" an investigation in order to protect a fake narrative? You would need a point man, right? Someone to manage & coordinate all critical points of information flow: evidence, media, law enforcement, intelligence community, possible foreign actors, etc. Enter: FBI Agent Robert Bohls, brand new head of the FBI's Salt Lake Field Office. He was installed just a few weeks before the assassination when Kash Patel unceremoneously relieved the former Special Agent in Charge, the "legendary" Mehtab Syed. What if I told you the internet lists a "Robert Bohls" as having moved to Saratoga Springs, UT, somewhere between March - June 2025? Literally down the street from the NSA's massive spying facility and also literally across the freeway/lake from UVU? Perfect positioning to help lead this "investigation" wouldn't you say? The same Robert Bohls has lived in the Northern Virginia area recently as well. That would match his known stint in Washington DC. Curiously, the same Bohls is listed as having lived in Orem several years ago. If this is the FBI's Robert Bohls, I find it noteworthy that he was acquiring housing a couple months before he was to be installed at the Salt Lake field office. Of course, this is all highly speculative. So, let's move on to what we know for sure.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2/ Special Agent in Charge of SLC, Robert Bohls, was formerly the head of the "National Cyber Joint Task Force." What is that? It's the "primary agency responsible for coordinating" investigations and liaising with the FBI's Cybercrime division, the CIA, the DOD, DHS & the NSA. It has the "primary responsibility to coordinate, integrate & share information" across all agencies and levels of investigations. Bohls's own online "resume" (pictured below), says he's an expert on: ▪️Transnational Organized Crime (there's your international component) ▪️Various facets/levels of law enforcement (local police) ▪️Crisis Response ▪️Surveillance ▪️Evidence Response Teams ▪️"Special Operations" ▪️National Security In other words, if you need a guy who can coordinate or manage a comprehensive cover-up between local law enforcement and intel agencies, you'd be hard pressed to find someone with better skills, experience and connections to do it. (Again, I'm not making any accusations. Do your own research.)

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

3/ But what of Mehtab Syed being replace in early August? Let's review: ▪️She was "legendary", "absolutely the best" ▪️Installed in February (after the new Trump administration was already sworn in) ▪️Offered a demotion to Huntsville in August, but took retirement instead (this offered transfer/demotion is an important detail for later)

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

4/ At the time, her departure--along with the firing of various other agents--was framed as the result of racism and sexism. But, as we shall see, that was actually wrong. It was something else entirely. Intentionally or not, this was a misdirect that established a plausible, but false narrative.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

5/ The day Charlie was assassinated, The Guardian ran a story that the order to take action against the fired FBI agents in early August came from White House aide STEPHEN MILLER ✡️! Someone who isn't in any Department of Justice/FBI chain of command. What's interesting is that: 1) Kash Patel admitted that he was forced to make these changes if he wanted to keep his own job. 2) Kash acknowledged that the FBI would be sued over many of these firings and LOSE. Yet they were willing to do it anyway. Now, we get back to the case of Mehtab Syed: she wasn't fired--she was offered a DEMOTION. But why? There it is in black and white: the FBI was not afraid of firing agents, getting sued for it, and losing. Why didn't they take this approach against Syed? Why didn't they just fire her, too? Is it because they didn't want her case going to court? Did they not want that level of scrutiny in her case? Did they want it to quietly go away? No court, no case, no discovery, no scrutiny, NO SPOTLIGHT. BTW, don't notice the ethnicity of the guy who wrote this story. Curiously, this particular article mentions NOTHING about Mehtab Syed. Why not? Did he not want us connecting Mehtab back to Stephen Miller? Was Miller behind her removal, too?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

6/ PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER ▪️A cover-up/conspiracy would require some kind of intelligence agency participation to some degree. ▪️A cover-up/conspiracy would probably require a point man in charge with the proximity, the tools, the connections and the expertise to pull it off. ▪️This point man would need to be installed in a way to not draw obvious controversy or attention when the change is made. ▪️The installation of this point man would need to have some element of plausible deniability or alternate explanation. IOW, you would need a point man who looks a lot like Robert Bohls. Again, I'm NOT making an accusation. I'm simply offering it as a thought experiment. If there is a point man, it could be someone else we don't know about. Questions remain: ▪️Is the Robert Bohls who moved to Saratoga Springs, UT, between March-June 2025 the same Robert Bohls that works for the FBI? ▪️If it is the same guy, why did he secure housing in Utah several weeks or months before he officially replaced Mehtab Syed? ▪️Did the order to swap out Syed indeed come from Stephen Miller? ▪️Why wasn't Syed fired like the other agents? ▪️Why was Syed removed? What else? Thoughts?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

7/ Remember: I don't know what happened. I'm not making definitive assertions or accusations. My overriding hypothesis has been that the telltale signs of a conspiracy/cover-up are present and that we should keep an open mind, because it's way too early to make definitive decisions and conclusions--just like it would have been way too early to draw definitive conclusions only 3 weeks after the assassinations of JFK, RFK and MLK. The goal of my research is to convince you that there are compelling reasons to keep digging. We owe it to Charlie. We owe it to ourselves. And we owe it to America. Tell me what you think below.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

8/ Review: The Deadly Parallels between CJK, JFK, RFK & MLK. https://t.co/yPSmxXjBwu

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

THE CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION CONSPIRACIES: ARE YOU JUST SEEING THINGS? One of the reasons people suspect a conspiracy behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk—including even a possible israeli/jewish role—is because they see similarities with other high profile assassinations that involved conspiracies with israel/jewish elements, like JFK's. But until now, nobody has really systematically listed these parallels. Here's my first attempt. What parallels do you see between these and the Charlie Kirk assassination? What did I miss? Are these parallels enough to justify having these conspiracy suspicions about Charlie's assassination? Or are we just seeing things? ▪️JFK▪️ 1. Lone gunman patsy ("Communist" Lee Harvey Oswald) 2. Shot in head in front of a crowd of people 3. Big event (Trip to Dallas, Parade, etc) 4. Irregularities & inconsistencies between eyewitness observed details of the shooting and the officially approved narrative of the shooting (TSBD vs DalTex vs Grassy Knoll; kill shot from front or back?) 5. "Magic" bullet theory 6. Medical report inconsistencies & subterfuge (botched autopsy, conflicting testimony, records tampering) 7. Straightforward jewish involvement (Dallas Citizens Council, led by jews, invited JFK to Dallas) 8. Weird jewish angle (Jack Ruby murders Lee Harvey Oswald) 9. LHO left behind notorious trail of documentary evidence, some of which may have been faked 10. Wanted to end Vietnam involvement (Vietnam was a war promoted by jews that benefited israel) 11. Tried to register AIPAC (AZC) under FARA 12. Was pro-israel, but also supported Palestinian Right of Return 13. Massive national event funeral with enormous crowds, television coverage, and powerful symbolism ▪️RFK▪️ 1. Lone gunman patsy ("Terrorist" Sirhan Sirhan) 2. Shot in head in front of a crowd of people 3. Big event (Just won the California Primary at Ambassador Hotel Celebration) 4. Irregularities & inconsistencies between eyewitness observed details of the shooting and the officially approved narrative of the shooting (Sirhan's shots came from the front & several feet away, while the death shots came from behind & close up; 10-13 shots heard vs only 8 bullets in Sirhan's gun) 5. "Magic" bullets & "Magic" shot (death bullets not a ballistics match for Sirhan's gun, kill shot came from behind, not the front) 6. Crime scene destroyed (the scene was not properly sealed allowing hundreds of people to pass through; key evidence such as the pantry door frames, ceiling tiles, and wood panels with possible bullet holes were destroyed or “lost” by the LAPD) 7. Autopsy report ignored (kill shots clearly came from behind, handwaved away at trial) 8. Weird jewish involvement (Press Secretary, Frank Mankiewicz—jewish member of the ADL—diverted RFK toward the pantry contrary to the prearranged exit through the ballroom) 9. jewish press first to establish the accepted narrative: that it was a case of Palestinian terrorism & hatred of israel (Jerry Cohen, LA Times) 10. Weird documentary evidence of the crime from the patsy (notes allegedly written by Sirhan confessing his plans to assassinate RFK; notebooks of Sirhan's writings used to paint his character to the public) 11. Wanted to end the Vietnam War (Vietnam was a war promoted by jews that benefited israel) 12. Tried to register AIPAC (AZC) under FARA 13. Supported right of israel to defend itself 14. Massive national event funeral with enormous crowds, television coverage, and powerful symbolism ▪️MLK▪️ 1. Lone gunman patsy ("Racist" James Earl Ray) 2. Shot in head in front of a group of people 3. Big Event (was in Memphis to support the Black sanitation workers' strike) 4. Irregularities & inconsistencies between eyewitness observed details of the shooting and the officially approved narrative of the shooting (some eyewitnesses say they heard shots from nearby bushes rather than the alleged boarding house) 5. "Magic" bullet (the fatal bullet failed the ballistics match to the rifle that was allegedly Ray's) 6. Crime scene destroyed immediately (within hours & into the next day, city workers cut down and cleared the brush where eyewitnesses placed a possible shooter, erasing any chance of testing whether a second shooter had been hidden there; bloody towels cleaned up; balcony not secured) 7. Cause of death/Autopsy inconsistency (multiple witnesses claim MLK was murdered while still alive at the hospital) 8. Weird jewish involvement (Ray's handler was a shadowy figure named Raul who was a known associate of Jack Ruby; Ray visited a jewish plastic surgeon the month before the assassination) 9. Weird israel angle (Ray assumed the identity of Eric Galt, the manager of a Union Carbide plant that manufactured bomb triggers for israel) 10. Straightforward jewish involvement (partnered with many jews and jewish organizations) 11. Wanted to end the Vietnam War (Vietnam was a war promoted by jews that benefited israel) 12. Had recently frustrated various jewish donors for his anti-war stance who turned on him and cut him off, to his consternation 13. Originally supported israel & scheduled a trip to visit, but then canceled it and began changing his views towards becoming more pro-Palestine 14. Massive national event funeral with enormous crowds, television coverage, and powerful symbolism 15. Death quickly and cynically exploited to get new laws passed that favored jewish agendas List the parallels you see to Charlie's assassination in the comments below. Let's crowd source.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

9/ If you appreciate my research, please consider financially supporting my work, since Twitter demonetized me & nuked my paid subs: BuyMeACoffee, Venmo, PayPal, CashApp & Crypto options are all available here: Flow.page/SamParkerSenate

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@shoegal0128 @chrismartenson's explanation is actually the best I've seen.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@truthtroll_X Bro, I can't stop. lol

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@knowledgefarmed Ty

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@marktournier2 I appreciate your appreciation

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@sandfish007 YW

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@munchmunchie_ Seethe. lol

BasedSamParker
Posted - October 7, 2025 at 7:58 PM
Saved - October 8, 2025 at 4:49 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I raised concerns about Josh Hammer's actions surrounding Charlie Kirk's assassination. Hammer referenced a 12-year-old Trump tweet the night before the event and failed to disclose key information from a group chat where Charlie indicated a shift in his pro-Israel stance. Despite being aware of this, Hammer publicly contradicted claims made by others. I questioned the timing of his statements and the parallels between Charlie's assassination and historical cases like JFK, RFK, and MLK, suggesting potential conspiracies. I invited others to share their thoughts on these parallels.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

JOSH HAMMER TREACHERY? FACT: Josh Hammer randomly dug up a 12-year old Trump tweet about public executions the night before Charlie was assassinated. FACT: That same night before the assassination, Josh Hammer told us he had a meeting with Charlie wherein he claimed Charlie hadn't changed his mind on israel. He neglected to say anything about Charlie's group chat statement from the previous day. FACT: Josh Hammer was in the group chat where Charlie admitted he was going to have to abandon the pro-israel cause, yet Hammer remained completely silent about this and called Candace Owens a liar for claiming Charlie's stance on israel was shifting. FACT: Josh Hammer knew about the letter to Netanyahu, but remained quiet and let others break the story. Why is Josh Hammer calling people liars for making true claims while remaining silent on key pieces of insider information himself that refute his own claims? Watch Josh Hammer tell you about being in the group chat and tell you Charlie wasn't shifting his stance. This is now confirmed to be untrue and it turns out Candace Owens was telling the truth. Why did hammer lie about Candace and not produce this information himself?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Over the past year and a half I became closer to Charlie Kirk, joining a group chat he called his 'brain trust.' We discussed Israel, Jewish–Christian relations, antisemitism. He was an adamant opponent of antisemitism. Campus talks exposed him to questions, including about the Talmud, and he provided 'very good answers'—'better answers than probably 98% of Jews probably could offer there.' We strategized to turn back the tide against rising antisemitism and anti-Israel sentiment. Charlie said roughly half, 50% of the questions that he got asked were all on Israel, Jews. He organized a Zoom call the night before Utah Valley University event, the first stop of a tour, with me, Pesach Willicki, producers, and one Christian pastor. The fact that he was seeking our counsel... calls into question this narrative that he was getting ready to renounce his lifelong support for the Jewish people, for the state of Israel.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It was really only over the past, I don't know, a year and a half or so that I would say that we became closer. I started going on his show, The Charlie Kirk Show, wildly popular podcast and radio show. I started going on the show more often, and we started talking very frequently. He formed a small group chat. There were probably seven or eight of us total in this group chat there. He called it his brain trust. His brain trust for thinking about Israel, for thinking about Jewish Christian relations. He was very concerned about rising antisemitism. This is something that he was an adamant opponent of. Is, Charlie, if you look at campus talks over the past couple years, he wasn't just getting asked about Israel. He not just getting asked about two state solution, about Gaza, borders, all this stuff there. No. He I mean, he was getting asked about, like, the Talmud, which is crazy. And he actually, like, was able to provide very good answers. You know, better answers than probably 98% of Jews probably could offer there. So we talked a little bit about that sort of stuff, frankly. But above all, we really strategize about how to turn back the tide against rising antisemitism and anti Israel sentiment on the American right in Republican Party circles among young Gen Z conservative activists there. And it it got to the point where these campus talks that Charlie was doing, give or take these are his words, not mine. He would say that roughly half, 50% of the questions that he got asked were all on Israel Jews, which first of all is disturbing. It's mind boggling. It's frankly disturbing. That is not a sign of a healthy society. So that's sobering in and of itself. But because of that, he did organize this Zoom call the night before he tragically was murdered. So the Utah Valley University event where he tragically was killed, just a day that will live in infamy, to borrow the FTR phrase from many decades ago. So that was supposed to be the first of a series of events. It's supposed be the first launching a campus tour. So, basically, before he set foot the first event, he wanted kind of an hour long kind of prep call. So it was me, a right wing rabbi friend of mine who lives in in in Jerusalem, Pesach Willicki, a couple of his producers, and there was one Christian pastor, and that was basically it. And Charlie had a list of questions. You know, how do I respond when the students ask me about starvation, famine, genocide, borders, two state solution, this, that, there. But the mere fact that he was seeking our counsel, and we communicated in a virtually daily basis through this active group chat and one one one on one. The fact that we were doing that along the fact that he had that particular Zoom call with people like me the night before he he he was killed, I I think really profoundly calls into question this narrative that he was getting ready to renounce his well established lifelong support for the Jewish people, for the state of Israel.

@josh_hammer - Josh Hammer

based

@realDonaldTrump - Donald J. Trump

Should be public execution for all to see-you will end this bullshit fast!

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2/ Immediately after the assassination, Hammer literally quoted the Trump tweet once again. Is this suspicious? https://t.co/fyLVB9NIB9 https://t.co/1BAUELhtrR

@josh_hammer - Josh Hammer

Public execution.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

3/ Is this just a coincidence? https://t.co/9p7SA60EXB

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

4/ If you think Tucker Carlson is a more dangerous & radical antisemite than Henry Ford, Charles Lindbergh, or David Duke--what action might you take to prevent Charlie Kirk from continuing to platform him to millions (or Candace Owens, for that matter)? https://t.co/mLmR4ANvDa

@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸

Josh Hammer: Charlie Kirk was trying to "keep Nick Fuentes neo-Nazi Groyper stuff at bay…" "I think Tucker Carlson is a malicious anti-Semite…the most dangerous anti-Semite in the history of the United States…" "I was not a fan of Tucker speaking at [TPUSA] events, but Charlie deserves the benefit of doubt on these issues because again, what he was really trying to do was to kind of hold the line, to keep the Fuentes Groyper stuff decidedly on the fringe…"

Video Transcript AI Summary
Charlie was trying to navigate this to keep the Nick Fuentes, neo Nazi, groyper stuff at bay while meeting Gen Z on their terms and guiding them toward a better place without the outmoded rhetoric and talking points of the 1970s, 1980s boomers. He aimed to "hold the line, to keep the Fuentes, Ruiper stuff decidedly on the fringe, very much out of the tent, at the movement." Charlie saw himself as a coalition leader of really MAGA, of the American right there, and sought a middle-ground foreign policy between Ron Paul isolationism and George W. Bush neoconservatism. Ali is probably why he gravitated towards my book and the Trump doctrine—conservative realist nationalist middle ground between the two poles. Think that's kind of why Charlie and I kind of saw eye to eye to eye analysis towards the end of his life. I think Tucker Carlson is a malicious anti Semite. I think he is the most dangerous anti Semite in the history of The United States.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What Charlie was essentially trying to do was he was essentially trying to figure out how to navigate this to keep the Nick Fuentes, neo Nazi, groyper stuff at bay while trying to meet the younger generation, the Gen Z folks who are pretty wobbly on this issue, to kind of meet them on their own terms and to try to kind of guide them towards a better place without using kind of the outmoded rhetoric and talking points of kind of the 1970s, 1980s boomers. That's essentially what he was trying to do. Now we can quibble as to whether he made the right decision here or there. I happen to not like that Tucker Carlson speaks at Turning Point USA events. I think Tucker Carlson is a malicious anti Semite. I think he's the most dangerous anti Semite in the history of The United States. Think that he is a profoundly dangerous man. Really, I genuinely feel that way actually. So I was not a fan of Tucker speaking at these events there. But Charlie deserves the benefit of doubt on these issues because, again, what he was really trying to do was to kind of hold the line, to keep the Fuentes, Ruiper stuff decidedly on the fringe, very much out of the tent, at the movement. And above all, Charlie was trying to do was to he saw himself correctly as a coalition leader, as a coalition leader of really MAGA, of the American right there. And we can kind of quibble as to where exactly you draw the line. When you're trying to kind of build an alliance of that nature there, he was trying to kind of strive towards some sort of middle way third ground foreign policy that was neither kind of Ron Paul isolationist nor a George W. Bush neoconservative. And that by the way, Ali, in some ways is probably why he gravitated towards my book and the way that I speak about this issue because I very much of, I personally am kind of of the Trump doctrine and belief, which is that there is kind of a conservative realist nationalist middle ground between the two twin poles there. Think that's kind of why Charlie and I kind of saw eye to eye to eye analysis towards the end of his life.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

5/ Every Accusation Is A Confession https://t.co/qBCbajY46b

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

6/ Now go read about the parallels between the JFK, RFK, MLK and now CJK assassinations: https://t.co/nnOjM07ned

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

THE CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION CONSPIRACIES: ARE YOU JUST SEEING THINGS? One of the reasons people suspect a conspiracy behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk—including even a possible israeli/jewish role—is because they see similarities with other high profile assassinations that involved conspiracies with israel/jewish elements, like JFK's. But until now, nobody has really systematically listed these parallels. Here's my first attempt. What parallels do you see between these and the Charlie Kirk assassination? What did I miss? Are these parallels enough to justify having these conspiracy suspicions about Charlie's assassination? Or are we just seeing things? ▪️JFK▪️ 1. Lone gunman patsy ("Communist" Lee Harvey Oswald) 2. Shot in head in front of a crowd of people 3. Big event (Trip to Dallas, Parade, etc) 4. Irregularities & inconsistencies between eyewitness observed details of the shooting and the officially approved narrative of the shooting (TSBD vs DalTex vs Grassy Knoll; kill shot from front or back?) 5. "Magic" bullet theory 6. Medical report inconsistencies & subterfuge (botched autopsy, conflicting testimony, records tampering) 7. Straightforward jewish involvement (Dallas Citizens Council, led by jews, invited JFK to Dallas) 8. Weird jewish angle (Jack Ruby murders Lee Harvey Oswald) 9. LHO left behind notorious trail of documentary evidence, some of which may have been faked 10. Wanted to end Vietnam involvement (Vietnam was a war promoted by jews that benefited israel) 11. Tried to register AIPAC (AZC) under FARA 12. Was pro-israel, but also supported Palestinian Right of Return 13. Massive national event funeral with enormous crowds, television coverage, and powerful symbolism ▪️RFK▪️ 1. Lone gunman patsy ("Terrorist" Sirhan Sirhan) 2. Shot in head in front of a crowd of people 3. Big event (Just won the California Primary at Ambassador Hotel Celebration) 4. Irregularities & inconsistencies between eyewitness observed details of the shooting and the officially approved narrative of the shooting (Sirhan's shots came from the front & several feet away, while the death shots came from behind & close up; 10-13 shots heard vs only 8 bullets in Sirhan's gun) 5. "Magic" bullets & "Magic" shot (death bullets not a ballistics match for Sirhan's gun, kill shot came from behind, not the front) 6. Crime scene destroyed (the scene was not properly sealed allowing hundreds of people to pass through; key evidence such as the pantry door frames, ceiling tiles, and wood panels with possible bullet holes were destroyed or “lost” by the LAPD) 7. Autopsy report ignored (kill shots clearly came from behind, handwaved away at trial) 8. Weird jewish involvement (Press Secretary, Frank Mankiewicz—jewish member of the ADL—diverted RFK toward the pantry contrary to the prearranged exit through the ballroom) 9. jewish press first to establish the accepted narrative: that it was a case of Palestinian terrorism & hatred of israel (Jerry Cohen, LA Times) 10. Weird documentary evidence of the crime from the patsy (notes allegedly written by Sirhan confessing his plans to assassinate RFK; notebooks of Sirhan's writings used to paint his character to the public) 11. Wanted to end the Vietnam War (Vietnam was a war promoted by jews that benefited israel) 12. Tried to register AIPAC (AZC) under FARA 13. Supported right of israel to defend itself 14. Massive national event funeral with enormous crowds, television coverage, and powerful symbolism ▪️MLK▪️ 1. Lone gunman patsy ("Racist" James Earl Ray) 2. Shot in head in front of a group of people 3. Big Event (was in Memphis to support the Black sanitation workers' strike) 4. Irregularities & inconsistencies between eyewitness observed details of the shooting and the officially approved narrative of the shooting (some eyewitnesses say they heard shots from nearby bushes rather than the alleged boarding house) 5. "Magic" bullet (the fatal bullet failed the ballistics match to the rifle that was allegedly Ray's) 6. Crime scene destroyed immediately (within hours & into the next day, city workers cut down and cleared the brush where eyewitnesses placed a possible shooter, erasing any chance of testing whether a second shooter had been hidden there; bloody towels cleaned up; balcony not secured) 7. Cause of death/Autopsy inconsistency (multiple witnesses claim MLK was murdered while still alive at the hospital) 8. Weird jewish involvement (Ray's handler was a shadowy figure named Raul who was a known associate of Jack Ruby; Ray visited a jewish plastic surgeon the month before the assassination) 9. Weird israel angle (Ray assumed the identity of Eric Galt, the manager of a Union Carbide plant that manufactured bomb triggers for israel) 10. Straightforward jewish involvement (partnered with many jews and jewish organizations) 11. Wanted to end the Vietnam War (Vietnam was a war promoted by jews that benefited israel) 12. Had recently frustrated various jewish donors for his anti-war stance who turned on him and cut him off, to his consternation 13. Originally supported israel & scheduled a trip to visit, but then canceled it and began changing his views towards becoming more pro-Palestine 14. Massive national event funeral with enormous crowds, television coverage, and powerful symbolism 15. Death quickly and cynically exploited to get new laws passed that favored jewish agendas List the parallels you see to Charlie's assassination in the comments below. Let's crowd source.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@ElYujo14564 I'm not claiming anything. I'm asking questions that highlight something that looks suspicious.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@prankcaller2000 He sucks

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@_bozzfeed 👀

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@iowapatsfan67 If only we had the prefix code to the secret assassination chat

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@Paranoidpropht I think Chris Martenson's analysis is the best: a rifle round from a different angle than the Tyler Robinson's position.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@ZMTabloid 🫡

bringbacklogic_
Posted - October 13, 2025 at 4:50 AM
Saved - October 23, 2025 at 2:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve reviewed the thread, the official charging documents, and the prosecutor’s statements about Tyler Robinson, plus a long series of claims about Charlie Kirk. I summarize: the texts are unlikely fake; autopsy was performed; the .30-06 wound could lack an exit wound under certain conditions; multiple debunked claims include exploding lapel mics, back-shot vs front-shot, and foreign-op involvement. The thread argues for evidence-based conclusions and cautions against hype or framing innocents.

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

THREAD: Fact-checking Claims Surrounding Charlie Kirk’s Death “Just asking questions” is not the same as asking loaded questions that wreck innocent people’s lives. It’s no longer about uncovering truth, it’s about DENYING it to push a narrative. And when controversy becomes currency, villains are invented, chaos is sold, and the truth pays the price. Questions ARE healthy. Paranoia isn’t. Let’s get back to asking SMART questions — the kind that seek truth, not destroy it. Because truth still matters.

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

First, it's important to establish that these are the official charging documents filed in the arrest of Tyler Robinson, not some "viral PDF." You can view them here: https://atty.utahcounty.gov/cms/uploads/TJR_Information_49872215e3.pdf https://t.co/qDAfGHPRSV

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

Next, here is the video of the prosecutor outlining the charges against Tyler Robinson. Though these are ALLEGATIONS pending a jury trial, he states: - Tyler turned himself in after a family intervention where he claimed he wanted to end his life instead of going to jail - Used a bolt-action .30-06 rifle, originally gifted by grandfather - Was in a romantic relationship with his roommate, a biological male transitioning genders - Mother alleged that he had become left-leaning in recent years, pro-gay and trans rights, and critical of Kirk's "hate" - Engaged in witness tampering by instructing roommate to delete incriminating texts and not speak to police - Surveillance footage showed him walking with an unusual gait, consistent with hiding a rifle in his pants leg - Police found spent cartridge casings at his residence with similar etchings to those on the rifle's ammunition - Police recovered the alleged murder weapon hidden, wrapped in a towel, with DNA evidence linking it to him https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFOCgrEpGxQ

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

False Claim #1: Tyler Robinson's texts are fake Reality: Claims that these texts are “fake” are extremely unlikely, as they were verified for inclusion in the official charging documents. If falsified (e.g., planted or staged), Tyler’s defense attorney could simply present counter-forensic evidence, such as communication records, metadata etc. to disprove their authenticity, potentially leading to a mistrial on the grounds of fraudulent or improperly obtained evidence. Though there is still time to do this, it has already been a month with no motion to dismiss. It’s reasonable to assume that the texts are from Tyler’s phone because no counter-evidence can be presented. (Still remains plausible though to question whether Tyler orchestrated the text messages to avoid implicating others who may have been involved.)

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

The message included in the charging documents show: - Direct confession by Tyler Robinson -His motive - Confirmation he was at the scene of the crime - Plan to escape with the gun, removing all evidence - That the gun was his grandfather's - The towel seen in the video of him dropping off the roof with his DNA on it - Engraving of the bullets seemingly before that info was publicly available - That his father suspected him from seeing the gun on TV -Confirmation that the deputy neighbor was with him when he turned himself in - Telling his lover to not talk to the media Ashton Forbes breaks this down here: https://t.co/FkbKDWrdAq

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

False Claim #2: “The texts were obviously written by an FBI agent because NO ONE talks like that” Reality: Someone who decides to murder someone has already proven they don’t think or act normal. You can’t use sensible logic to judge irrational behavior. Secondly, it’s far more plausible that Tyler scripted them in an attempt to absolve his roommate (and maybe others) than for the FBI to have planted them on his phone. Framing him would require hacking or physically accessing Robinson’s phone, bypassing encryption, and ensuring the messages blend with his communication patterns and timestamps. Again, Tyler's defense attorney could file a motion for dismissal if this were the case, but they haven't. However, the way they read is extremely detailed, as if to cover all bases. It’s actually the same playbook Walter White used in Breaking Bad and there are many real-world cases of people fabricating alibis via texts or emails.

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

False Claim #3: "It's IMPOSSIBLE that a .30-60 wouldn't have an exit wound on a human. You’re pushing a magic bullet theory” Reality: Though admittedly rare, it IS possible under the right conditions. Documented medical cases, marines, hunters, gun experts, ChatGPT, Grok etc. all confirm that it CAN be stopped, deflected, or fragment when it hits vertebrae.

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

Documented medical cases with no exit wound 👇 https://t.co/b5HlRuHpFv

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

Marine confirming it’s possible 👇

@TigTiegen - John “TIG” Tiegen

People keep arguing over what really happened to Charlie Kirk. I get it. Nobody trusts much anymore. Not the government. Not the media. Not influencers. But somewhere in all the noise, the facts are still there. Charlie was hit once. Right side of the neck. The shot came from above and to his right, around four hundred feet out. That is not rumor. That is what the forensics say. The bullet did not exit. People say that is impossible for a thirty aught six. It is not. Bone, angle, and energy loss can stop even a rifle round cold. It is rare, but it is real. Military wound labs, FBI files, and medical journals have all recorded it before. This was not a magic bullet. It was bad geometry. When you shoot downward from elevation, the bullet travels on a steeper path than your crosshairs. If you do not know that offset, your round hits higher than you think. That is how a man aiming at the chest ends up hitting the neck. He probably was not trained. He just did not understand the angle. Now here is what most people miss. The round entered on the right side and stopped just under the skin on the left. That kind of energy dumps everything inside the body. The pressure wave and shattered bone force the blood and tissue to blow out through the weak side. It is violent. It looks like an exit but it is not. The bullet still sliced through layers of skin as it slowed, leaving a ragged tear. That is why the left side exploded with blood even though the bullet never left his body. This would explain why the left side blew out the way it did. You do not have to be a doctor or see the autopsy report to understand that kind of force. You just have to know basic physics and what high velocity rounds do inside the body. That is a real explanation, not some alien theory or secret agent storyline. Now about all these cover up claims. I have heard them all. Government. Feds. Foreign ties. Could they lie. Sure. They have done it before. But ask yourself why they would here. What is the gain. If there was a bigger secret, you would see missing evidence, conflicting reports, or sealed files that do not make sense. None of that has happened. Could they be protecting themselves from embarrassment over security failures. Maybe. But that is not the same as rewriting what happened. This is not about taking the government’s side. It is about sticking to what can be proven. Skepticism is healthy. Blind faith is not. And neither is blind outrage. If someone says they have new information, tell them to show it. Evidence has timestamps, trajectories, and autopsy reports. Not whispers or secondhand clips. Truth does not need hype. It just needs receipts. Tig Hashtags: #TruthHasEvidence #FactsOverFear #ModernPatriotPodcast #BallisticsDontLie #AlwaysMoveForward

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

Gun expert confirming its possible, though admittedly rare 👇 https://t.co/RbYGrr1wLd

@Mrgunsngear - Mrgunsngear

Is the "official story" that Charlie Kirk was shot in the neck by a 30-06 from ~130 yards away but didn't have an exit would even possible? Let's discuss... #CharlieKirk https://t.co/vpk9Yklp2i

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the shooting of Charlie and examines the official narrative. The host notes that the official story is a sniper on a roof at roughly 130–140 yards, using a 30-06 bolt-action rifle, with ammunition that impacted Charlie’s neck and left no exit wound. He mentions that conservative media outlets have asked him whether this is plausible, and that Alex Jones reported TP USA sources claiming the bullet entered Charlie’s back at a downward angle and stayed there. Key points about the 30-06 are explained for context. The caliber was the US military standard in World War I and II, making it an older design. A comparison is shown with a 5.56 and a 0.308 projectile to illustrate size: the 30-06 bullet appears large, but ballistically it is very similar to the 0.308 due to powder improvements over time. The host emphasizes that many people now have experience with 0.308, so his discussion centers on terminal performance in soft tissue rather than cartridge shape alone. Several ballistic factors are highlighted. Bullets for 30-06 in 2025 vary widely in weight, typically 150–180 grains, with some as light as 110 grains and up to 200+ grains. Lighter, longer bullets can have higher ballistic coefficients, meaning they travel through air with less resistance and are very stable in flight, but they destabilize more quickly in soft tissue. He notes that higher ballistic coefficient projectiles may behave differently upon impact, potentially increasing the likelihood of atypical behavior upon penetrating flesh. However, the exact projectile type (full metal jacket, open-tip match, soft point, etc.) is unknown, and the FBI has released no information about the actual projectile. Regarding the probability of the reported scenario (a downward-angle hit with a 30-06 leaving no exit wound), the host estimates the odds as very small but not impossible. He provides a rough quantified sense: if this scenario happened a thousand times under the same conditions, it might occur one or two times. He stresses that it’s very unlikely that such a powerful round would leave no exit wound, but not impossible. He notes he has seen angles from different views suggesting no exit wound. He proposes that if the FBI and law enforcement want public confidence in the story, more information should be released. For example, if the bullet stayed in the upper torso, one would expect to see a temporary cavity forming as the bullet penetrates, and such cavitation would be evident in an autopsy; no autopsy details have been released in his view. He reiterates that the official account is highly improbable based on his experience with ballistics, armor, gel, and animals, but not proven impossible. The host invites questions in the comments and on his social media, asks viewers to say a prayer for Charlie and his family, and closes the video.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome back everyone. Today we're making a video that I wish I wasn't making because I wish the events that we're gonna discuss here never unfolded. But unfortunately, as of course all of you know, Charlie was killed and the official narrative anyway, which there are a lot of holes in the official narrative, is that there was a man shooting from roughly a 130 to a 140 yards away from elevated position with a 30 aught six chambered bolt action rifle with a relatively long barrel. We'll get to that here in just a little bit. And he was using 30 aught six ammunition in that it impacted Charlie's neck and there was no exit wound. So when that was announced, I believe that was announced on Saturday, don't quote me on that, I got a ton of texts from people in the industry asking what I thought about that. I would tell them, and then this morning, because obviously it's Monday as of when I'm filming this, I'm not sure when it's gonna be up. But this morning, pretty much all the conservative media agencies reached out to me one in one form or another and asked if they thought it brother, if I thought this was possible or plausible or insane or completely, you know, complete nonsense if that makes sense. During those time during the time rather from when it was announced, that there was no exit wound to when, you know, now we're making this video, Alex Jones has made a video stating, and you guys can think whatever you want about Alex Jones, but it's an interesting insight, that the gentleman from TP USA who he talked to said that, the bullet went at a down angle into, Charlie's back essentially and stayed there. So let's discuss. So first off, for that many of you guys watching this, might not be familiar with what we're talking about with a 30 out six. 30 out six is the caliber that was the primary cartridge used by the US military for both World War one and World War two, so it is a relatively old bullet design. So, for example, this is a five five six projectile, this is a three zero eight projectile, and then next to it that is a 30 aught six projectile. Now, I show you guys this, not to make it seem like this is a gigantic bullet, which it is, it's a fairly large bullet, and thirty-six is a powerful round, no doubt about it. But compared to the five fifty six, you'll see that the five fifty six, the entire projectile case, powder, everything just sits in the case of the thirty-six. Now, one thing to preface that with is that 30 aught six, again, it was designed a long time ago, they didn't have as efficient powders as we have today. So in terms of ballistics, it's very, very similar to the three zero eight. The zero eight is just a touch behind it, but they improved the powders a lot. So while this does look much larger, ballistically, they are very, very similar. So, those of you guys who have experience or know people who have experience with three zero eight, in terms of terminal performance, I e how a bullet performs in soft tissue, they're going to be extremely, extremely similar. So I just say that because a lot more people in 2025 have experience with three zero eight than they do with thirty out six. So there is that just to start out with. So a few things about the shooting that we have to take into account. Again, I'm just going to talk about the official narrative. There are a lot of other narratives, lot of other theories that I think many of them have some plausibility, but for the purposes of this video, we are just going to talk about the official narrative, sniper on the roof, 30 aught six, one hundred and thirty, 140 yards away, and the impact that we all saw. Of course, I will not be showing any of that, but if the video is horrible and but if you saw it, some of the things that are in it are relevant to today's video. So there's that. So a few things about 30.6 is that especially in 2025, there are bullet weights that are all over the place. Like this one here, I believe is a 168 grain projectile. So the grain just means how many units, if you will, of actual mass go into the bullet itself. So in '30 s six today, most of them are gonna be between 150 to 180 grains in terms of size. However, there are a huge swath in terms of actual projectiles for this caliber. So I mean, I'm sure there's weird ones out there that I'm not even thinking about, but they they go go all the way down to a 110 grains all the way up to 200 grains and over. And so, one of the reasons you go for a smaller, and this has a lot to do with bolt design, but it's going to impact what I'm about to say here in a minute. One of the things, with a lighter longer bullet that you get in terms of performance when a bullet is flying through the air, it's called ballistic coefficient. Now, not all lighter weight projectiles are gonna have a higher ballistic coefficient, but many of them will. So, what the ballistic coefficient means for people who are not shooters, I'm gonna try not to go into too many rabbit holes today, but these things are important if we wanna understand the probability of the official story that we are being told today. So, a higher ballistic coefficient bullet is going to go through the air with less resistance. That's essentially what it means. And those bullets tend to be stable, very stable actually when they're going through the air. However, when they hit soft tissue, they destabilize much more quickly and are more likely to tumble than a heavier grain projectile and that just has to do with the mass of the actual projectile, right? So, the mass of a heavier projectile is likely to keep going in the direction it was going if it is heavier. I think everyone kind of gets that if you, you know, were to throw a boulder at something, it's going to be very different in terms of when it impacts a material than if you were to throw a small pebble at it. Right? Well, same thing is true here for the bullet weight. So, that is something to consider and as of right now, the FBI has released zero information at all about the actual projectile used. So, going back to what I earlier said earlier, the most common of the cartridges or the bullets that are used in 30 ought six rather are between a 150 to 180 grade. So keep that in mind. So with all that said, if you were to just ask me what are the odds of a 30 oz six projectile being shot at a downward angle, I think the angle from what I've seen online is anywhere from eight to 12 degrees, being shot at a downward angle, hitting someone in the neck, going into their chest cavity is. I would say it's very small, extremely small, but not impossible. I realize many of you guys, I'm slow to this video, was kind of on the edge as to whether or not I wanted to make it. But many of you guys have watched other people's videos where they're saying it's impossible. I get that, but weird things can happen with bullets when they get into soft tissue. Many of you guys have shot a lot of fleshy things. I have as well, particularly with three zero eight. I've shot a lot of things with three zero eight over the years and every now and then you see a bullet go in and exit somewhere at like a 90 degree angle or something like that. Those things absolutely do happen and if you were just to ask me how probable is it that this story happened the way it's being reported by the FBI as well as the folks at TPUSA, I would say it is very low but not impossible. So just to put a number on it, right? So if this type of scenario happened a thousand times, right, all the same factors that we're talking about, the angle, flesh, neck, etcetera. If all these things happen a thousand times, I would expect to see a result like this maybe one or two times, possibly, maybe. It's very unlikely that a bullet of with the power of 30 out six, which is a very powerful round, would not blow completely through and leave an exit wound. It's not impossible though. That is what I'm saying. Additionally, what I am saying is that I have seen the angles, I'm sure many of you guys have as well, from both the left side as well as behind Charlie a little bit, and you definitely don't see an exit wound. So, believe that whatever he was shot with, there was no exit wound. I do have some questions that I want to get to about that here in just a second based on a couple videos I have seen. The chances of this happening, the way they're saying it happened, in my opinion, based on years of shooting armor, gel, animals, all types of things that you guys have seen here on the channel, they go up if it was a higher ballistic coefficient bullet. Again, going back to what I was outlining earlier, those are very stable in the air. However, when they hit soft fleshy material, they destabilize much more quickly than heavier, low ballistic coefficient projectiles. So, if it was like some sort of odd copper round or something like that, it is much more likely I would give it a number like 10 in a thousand, something like that. Still extremely unlikely, I want to be very very clear on this. What they're saying happened is extremely unlikely. It's not impossible. And the odds go up if it was a higher ballistic coefficient projectile. Again, don't even know what type of projectile it was. We don't know if it was full metal jacket. We don't know if it was a open tip match. We don't know if it was a soft point. All of those other factors would also have to be factored into what I'm saying, but we don't know any of those variables rather so I can't say it. Then if you were to tell me that it was like a 180 grain projectile foam metal jacket let's say, I would tell you that it's about as low as possible. So I don't know, one in fifty thousand chance that that could happen, right? So the odds change, right, based on the input that is happening. However, in all cases, it is very unlikely that what we are being told happened actually happened. And the only way I can really think of in terms of if the FBI and other law enforcement agencies actually want the American people to be confident in the story we're being told is to release more information. So for example, if this happened and the bullet actually stayed in Charlie's upper torso, what you'd expect to see on video, and again I haven't seen it yet, what you would expect to see is when the bullet impacts him, if it was deflected down into his chest cavity, you would expect to see the chest cavity go like that. For those of you guys who watch a lot of ballistics videos, you'll know that that is called the temporary cavity, right? So, when a high power rifle round like a point zero -six impacts fleshy material, it goes through and it's going through so fast that fleshy material is obviously almost all water, so you can't compress water. And so, because of that, the bullets going through so fast, the water material, the flesh material can't expand as fast as the bullet is going through. So, it kind of pushes everything out with some violence away from the bullet path, if that makes sense. So you typically will see something like that happen. Now, I've seen two pretty good high definition videos of this. I haven't observed that behavior at all in Charlie's torso, however. I have no idea what the frame rate those videos are at. So again, I can't say definitively, but I would would say that if it was a 30 out six and it was contained within his chest cavity, I would expect to see that happen within his chest. For a brief moment in time, we don't see that. However, even with that, if that did happen and there was what is called the temporary cavity, temporary stretch cavity some people call it, as well as you'll have the permanent cavity, which is what is actually crushed and crushed rather and destroyed by the path of the bullet, that would be very easily seen in an autopsy, right? So, the autopsy has not been released that I have seen and, if the story that we are being told happened as it is be as it is claimed anyway, that kind of cavitation and damage would be very apparent based on what happens with any type of thirty-six. I mean, again, are very powerful rounds for sure. A lot of people will say that the AR 15 shoots an extremely powerful round. Well, again, not even close. The 30 at six is a hammer and, what we're being told again is very unlikely, just not impossible to hit the point again. So, with that, that really is my take on it. If you guys have questions or anything like that, feel free to post them down below in the comments section. Additionally, all the other, social media where I will be posting this, you can ask, post those questions over there as well. But that is my initial thoughts on the possibility that the official story, which again, there's a lot of holes in the official story, but possibility that that happened ballistically because that is kind of the area that I do know based on my experience. So that is it. Let me know what you guys think down below. Before closing the video out, just ask everyone to say a prayer for Charlie and Charlie's family and everyone around them. I can't imagine what they're going through, especially Charlie's wife. So please do that. And with that, we're gonna close the video out. Thank you all for watching. I truly appreciate it. And I look forward to seeing everybody in the next video.

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

Many hunters have confirmed no exit wounds are possible with .30-06👇 https://t.co/SzrWXV1buP

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

Grok response: https://t.co/3JC6cIt3xS

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

Also, MLK. The Remington .30‑06 rifle used in the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. did not produce an exit wound — a fact confirmed by both the official autopsy and a subsequent congressional forensic review. This isn't speculation; it's documented history. If a high-powered rifle failed to cause an exit wound in one of the most scrutinized shootings in modern history, why is it so hard to believe it could happen in other cases?

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

At this point, it’s clearly demonstrated that it IS possible. But what’s truly fascinating is that someone who chooses to deny this reality is left asking the question: If the FBI were intentionally lying about the caliber, wouldn’t they have chosen a version of the story that didn’t invite so much scrutiny and debate? It’s far more reasonable to believe they reported that caliber because it’s what the evidence actually showed

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

False Claim #4: “Kirk was killed by an exploding lapel mic” Reality: A lapel mic lacks the space and power for a lethal explosion. Video footage shows the mic moving WITH the blast, not causing it, disproving the claim. Here is Nate Cornacchia, retired green beret (who even doubts the FBI narrative) but debunks this specific claim 👇 https://youtu.be/TCF6UJKVKFc?si=wIgPG4i05ljxMhf5

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

False Claim #5: “Kirk was shot from the back, not the front” Reality: Even Candace has shifted to the official FBI narrative that Kirk was shot from the front. She then incorrectly states that it would be impossible with a .30-06 round👇

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

Though her conclusions are inaccurate, Candace Owens shifts to the FBI’s original narrative that Charlie Kirk was shot from the FRONT and that the bullet DID NOT EXIT his body. That's a start. https://t.co/L90hrg1rVw

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that Charlie Kirk was shot from the front and that the bullet did not exit his body, with at least a fragment of the bullet recovered from his neck. This is presented as the part of the story that is true and is claimed to dispel various theories. The speaker states they have fact-checked this information from multiple sources over more than a week of review. The fragment is described as being recovered “right around here,” approximately in line with Charlie Kirk’s shoulder blade, near the center of the back, in a location “almost in line with your shoulder blade.” The speaker argues this location provides a bullet trajectory: the bullet entered in the described area, was stopped there, and a fragment was pulled from the neck region along the spine’s line. A key point emphasized is that a .30-06 round was not recovered intact. The speaker asserts that there was no recovered bullet from a .30-06, stating that “They did not recover a bullet from a 30 odd six. They didn’t recover a bullet from a 30 odd six. Just didn't happen.” They contrast this with the presence of .30-06 bullets in some context, implying that while .30-06 rounds were found, no complete bullet was recovered. The speaker notes that death certificates in suicide cases typically reflect the gun and the bullet when both are known, and claims that there is not a bullet reflected on Charlie Kirk’s death certificate because a .30-06 bullet was not recovered. The speaker asserts that the information has been cross-checked with multiple sources and that it undermines other theories, reinforcing that common sense supports their account. The closing remark addresses hunters and military personnel, acknowledging agreement with their perspective: “Hunters and military men rejoice. It turns out that common sense still rules the roost. Okay? You guys were right.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now I can tell you the part that he is telling the truth about is that Charlie's neck indeed did stop the bullet without question. Okay? And this is going to dispel a lot of theories that are out there, and I'm telling you this 100%. Charlie Kirk was shot from the front, and the bullet did not exit. And at least a fragment of the bullet was recovered from his neck. And I'm going to tell you exactly where it was recovered from. I have fact checked this information from multiple sources now. I've actually been sitting on this, for a little bit over a week. Right around here. So think about almost in line with your shoulder blade right in the center. Now why is that helpful? Because it gives us a bullet trajectory. Okay? Went in here where you saw that, and it was stopped and a fragment was pulled from think of right if you're just touching your spine in line, with your shoulder blade. That leads us obviously to the part that he's maybe not being forthcoming about. They did not recover a bullet from a 30 odd six. They didn't recover a bullet from a 30 odd six. Just didn't happen. Okay? They had found a 30 odd six bullets. Charlie's death certificate certainly would have reflected that. In suicide in suicide situations, that's just one example, medical examiners feel free to chime in. I've spoken to quite a few. But when the gun and the bullet are known, they are reflected onto the death certificate. Okay? There is not one reflected onto Charlie Kirk's death certificate because they did not recover a bullet from a 30 out of six. Hunters and military men rejoice. It turns out that common sense still rules the roost. Okay? You guys were right. You're absolutely right.

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

False Claim #6: “Kirk’s death certificate doesn’t mention a .30-06 round, which it should.” Reality: Death certificates typically do not specify the caliber of a gunshot wound, focusing instead on the cause of death. That’s why Kirk’s death certificate does not mention a caliber at all—not even a different one.

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

False Claim #7: “There was no autopsy completed for Kirk, which is why one hasn’t been released.” Reality: Utah law *requires* an autopsy in homicide cases and does not allow anyone, not even Erika Kirk, to request that one not be completed. It's not to prove that he died, but to prove how he died to a jury -- showing ballistics, trajectory, entry wound, bullet etc. Official reports confirm one was performed by the Utah Medical Examiner's Office, with preliminary findings (e.g., neck gunshot, no exit wound due to bone density) referenced in media. No full report is public yet (as of October 14, 2025—normal for ongoing investigations, expected in 4–6 weeks), but fact-checks and surgeon statements contradict the "no autopsy" narrative. Where did this belief come from? A viral (unverified) dispatch audio clip, claimed "no autopsy was performed" before Charlie Kirk's death certificate was issued. In the ~30-second audio (allegedly from Utah emergency dispatch), a voice states: "He did not go in for an autopsy, the death certificate was signed by the doctor at the hospital." However, the viral clip likely refers to the initial hospital pronouncement (where a doctor can sign a preliminary death certificate for natural/sudden deaths), but in homicides, the certificate is amended post-autopsy. Experts like Lauren the mortician notes it's a common mix-up in rushed reporting. She also alleges that she specifically CONFIRMED with her own source that one was completed, watch here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsS1V4jvcFM

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

False Claim #8: "Kirk's hands in casket looked like a mannequin, it's so fake" Lauren the mortician confirms that his hands look completely normal for *deceased* hands. Waxy, flat color, stiffness, etc. is embalming 101. It appears waxy because the body’s natural fluids are replaced with preservative chemicals like formaldehyde, which harden the tissues. This process halts decomposition and removes moisture, giving the skin a smooth, wax-like appearance. The stiffness comes from protein cross-linking caused by the embalming fluid, which essentially “sets” the muscles in place.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: I'm struggling to believe that these hands on the open casket of the live performance of Charlie Kirk—who was allegedly murdered—are real. I asked GPT to confirm whether the hands were real. The wider shot confirms it even more clearly: the hands lying on the suit look artificial. The texture is too smooth, the color is flat and waxy, there are no veins, pores, or natural warmth. The positioning is stiff and mannequin-like, not how a relaxed human hand would rest. The hand with pink nails is clearly real. To confirm, the hands on the body in the suit aren’t real; they look like wax or a mannequin or some sort of prop. After I sent this message, I got a notification. I hadn’t been on ChatGPT for ages; the first time I started diving back in, it came up saying that it looks like my server responded with the wrong SSL. Speaker 1: Oh my god. He actually asked ChatGPT if the hands were real, not if they were deceased, just are they real? And then acted like he solved the crime novel when the AI said no, they’re waxy. Congrats—you outsmarted a robot with a bad riddle. But here’s the hilarious part: everything ChatGPT listed as proof they were fake—waxy texture, flat color, stiffness, and the way the hands are positioned—is literally embalming 101. You accidentally read off my mortuary science textbook, so thanks for the assist, buddy. Bruh. All of this conspiracy energy makes me realize how little people actually know about death care. Speaker 2: Very next day. They didn’t even have time to refrigerate him and perform an autopsy. I mean, obviously we saw what happened. We saw what happened. Thank god I have not seen it; I don’t want to see that. But I can assure you that that is not a person. That is not real. For it to get to this level, it’s going to have to have been at least a week. I remember, but I’ve never worked in a funeral home. If there’s a debate, I don’t want to start it, because if you don’t see it, I can’t help the blind, you know what I’m saying? Speaker 1: And then there’s her; she literally says she’s never worked at a funeral home and then launches into a whole CSI monologue. Like, no. Have you worked in a funeral home? Again, no. Then why are you out here diagnosing embalmed?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I am still having a struggling time believing that these hands right here on the open casket of the live performance of the beloved Charlie Kirk who was maliciously murdered the other day are actually real. So I've had to ask GPT. Now I rarely use chat GPT, but what happened after this question was very weird. But anyway, we asked, so to confirm these hands aren't real and send the images of the hands, and it said, yeah. Looking at this wider shot confirms it even more clearly. The hands lying on the suit look artificial. The texture is too smooth. The color is flat and waxy. There are no veins, pores, or natural warmth. The positioning is also stiff and mannequin like and how a not how a relaxed human hand would naturally rest. The hand with pink nails is clearly real bloody bloody blah. So to confirm, the hands on the body in the suit aren't real. They look like wax or mannequin or some sort of prop. Now let me show you what happened after I sent this message. I got this notification. Now I haven't been on ChatGPT for ages. The first time I start diving into this, it's literally came up saying that it looks like my server responded with the wrong SSL. Speaker 1: Oh my god. He actually asked ChatGPT if the hands were real, not if they were deceased hands. Just are they real? And then acted like he solved the crime novel when the AI said, no. They're waxy. Congrats. You outsmarted a robot with a bad riddle. But here's the hilarious part. Everything chat GPT listed as proof they were fake, waxy texture, flat color, stiffness, positioned hands is literally embalming one zero one. You accidentally read off my mortuary science textbook, so thanks for the assist, buddy. Bruh. All of this conspiracy energy makes me realize how little people actually know about death care. Speaker 2: Very next day. So they didn't even have time to refrigerate him and bomb him. Like, he got no autopsy done. Like, I mean, obviously, we saw what happened. Right? We saw what happened. I mean, thank god I have not seen it. I don't wanna see that. But I can assure you that that is not a person. That is not that's not real. That's not real. For it to get to this level, it's gonna have to have been at least a week. Okay? I I remember I know. But I mean, I've never worked in a funeral home. Okay? If there's a I don't even wanna start this debate because because if you don't see it, I can't help those I cannot help the blind. You know what I'm saying? Speaker 1: And then we've got her. She literally says, I've never worked at a funeral home and then launches into a whole CSI monologue. Like, no. Have you worked in a funeral home? Again, no. Then why are you out here diagnosing embalmed?

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

Part 2: https://t.co/ZXz8vzhsOz

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker addresses several common claims about the deceased, providing corrected explanations based on mortuary practice. They state that the body was embalmed, which is why the hands appear waxy; embalming firms the tissues, removes circulation, and creates a smooth, waxy look, after which cosmetics are applied to restore color. In this case, the embalmer apparently was attempting to cover bruising, rather than color-correct, resulting in a heavy, dark, and incorrect shade that makes the hands read as unnatural or mannequin-like to nonexperts. The speaker emphasizes that the appearance is due to embalming and cosmetics, not refrigeration, a week-long delay, or Hollywood special effects. Regarding autopsies, the speaker asserts that high-profile homicide equals automatic autopsy, a standard procedure that applies regardless of who the person is. They argue that the body was autopsied immediately and embalmed immediately, and that all of this can occur within a twenty-four hour window when involved parties include the family, law enforcement, and, in this case, the vice president, implying funeral homes can move quickly when necessary. On the matter of whether the body could have had time to deteriorate or be left unrefrigerated, the speaker rejects the notion, reiterating that the process involved was rapid autopsy and embalming, not a delayed or neglected handling. When addressing the appearance of the hands, the speaker explains that what is seen is not a wax dummy but embalming with cosmetics. The embalmer’s goal was to cover bruising, but the cosmetic work was done poorly—too heavy, too dark, and the wrong shade—leading to the perception of aging or an unnatural look. The speaker also tackles a question about a missing indent where a wedding ring would be. They explain that men’s rings often sit differently than women’s; rings slide over larger knuckles and may not leave a deep indent. They note that the groove may not be permanent, and point out that watching videos of him shows him handling his rings, suggesting the indentation isn’t definitive. Furthermore, embalming changes the appearance by firming and plumping tissues, which can smooth small lines, wrinkles, and minor indentations. The speaker gives an example of elderly individuals looking years younger after embalming because fine wrinkles fill in. In summary, the video argues that the observed waxy hands result from embalming and cosmetics, not refrigeration or negligence; autopsies are performed promptly in high-profile cases; the rapid timeline is plausible given involving parties; and ring indent explanations combine anatomy (knuckles) with embalming effects, rather than indicating a missing feature.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Like you've got a prep room in your basement. She says they didn't have time to refrigerate him. They didn't have time to embalm him. Wrong. He was embalmed. That's why the hands look waxy. That's literally the whole point of embalming. She says he didn't get an autopsy. Wrong again. High profile homicide equals automatic autopsy. That's standard procedure. Doesn't matter who you are. She says for his hands to look that weird, it had to have at least been a week. Girl, how would you even know that? Did you sneak into a funeral home on a field trip and forget to tell us? Because unless you've stood over an embalming table, you don't get to set timelines like you're the county coroner. The reality is simple. He was autopsied immediately, embalmed immediately, and, yes, all of that can happen in a twenty four hour window. When the family, law enforcement, and in this case, the vice president are involved, funeral homes move fast. Well, we definitely can when it matters. Now about those hands. What you're seeing isn't a wax dummy. It's embalming in cosmetics. Embalming firms the tissues, removes circulation, and that alone creates this smooth waxy look. Then cosmetics are applied to restore color. In this case, the embalmer clearly was trying to cover bruising, gonna give him the benefit of the doubt, instead of color correcting. They just painted over it. It's too heavy, it's too dark, and it's the wrong shade. And that's why the hands look aged, and that's why the hands look unnatural. It reads as mannequin to people who don't know what they're looking at, but to me, it's just bad cosmetics. So no, it's not about refrigeration. It's not some week old body left sitting around, And it's definitely not Hollywood special effects. It's embalming done quickly and cosmetics done poorly. The only thing fake here is the confidence of people pretending they know what happens behind closed doors in a funeral home. You don't need special effects experience to understand this. You need mortuary science, and that's why I'm here. So let them keep shouting wax figure. All I see is embalming with a bad paint job. And honestly, that's on the embalmer, not the body. So someone asked why doesn't he have an indent on his finger where his wedding ring should be? Well, let's break that down because first, men's rings usually fit different than women's. Most men have larger knuckles, so the ring slides over the knuckle and sits looser on the finger itself. That means there's not always a deep indent to begin with. And if you watch videos of him, you'll even see him playing with his rings, so it's not like that groove was permanent. Second, embalming changes everything. The fluid firms and plumps the tissues, almost like it's rehydrating the skin. It can smooth out small lines, wrinkles, even minor indents. I have had 90 year old ladies who look years younger after embalming because those fine wrinkles fill back in.

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

False Claim #9: "Josh Hammer was NOT referencing Iryna when he tweeted about public executions on 9/9 because it wasn't even trending" Reality: This claim, amplified by Candace Owens, is easily debunked. Iryna’s case was trending on 9/9, referenced by Charlie Kirk himself and even the White House. Thousands of tweets, including discussions on the death penalty AND public executions, circulated among major conservative X accounts. Evidence follows, starting with Owens’ false claim. This is the perfect example of the importance of not hiding behind the guise of “just asking questions” when the clear intent is to frame an INNOCENT person to your audience, leading them to the false conclusion that Hammer had foreknowledge of his friend’s murder, thereby implicating him.

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

First, these are the tweets circulating of Josh Hammer that are being referenced by conspiracy theorists. This interpretation of foreknowledge ignores all context and reality, requiring the absurd assumption that Hammer would publicly post something implicating himself if he were involved:

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

Here is President Trump himself holding a briefing in the Oval Office at 10:52am that highlighted Iryna's murder by career criminal Decarlos Brown Jr. https://t.co/3LZfIyH4qM

@WhiteHouse - The White House

President Donald J. Trump denounces senseless crime in Democrat-run cities & the horrific murder of a young woman in Charlotte by a deranged criminal monster. "It's time to stop this madness. The people of our country need to insist on protection, safety, LAW & ORDER." https://t.co/eUD5KuTufC

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes Democrat governance of major cities, arguing that Democrat-run cities have allowed savage, bloodthirsty criminals to prey on innocent people. They claim radical left judges, politicians, and activists in these cities have adopted a policy of catch and release for thugs and killers. The speaker cites a specific incident in Charlotte, North Carolina, where a 23-year-old woman who came from Ukraine was murdered on a public train, presenting a photo of the victim and stating she was a beautiful young girl with a magnificent future in this country who is now dead. The killer is described as a deranged monster who was roaming free after 14 prior arrests. The speaker asserts that a depraved criminal element of violent repeat offenders is spreading destruction and death throughout the country and insists that the response must be forceful and strong, stating that “they” understand only one language: to be vicious like them. They claim that 24 of the top 25 most dangerous cities in America are run by Democrat mayors, with Chicago highlighted as an example where 50 people were murdered in recent weeks and hundreds were shot. The speaker contends that it is time to stop this madness and that the people of the country need protection, safety, law, and order. A claim is made that it has been proven that safety can be restored, citing Washington, DC, as an example. The speaker describes DC as previously a bloodthirsty, horrible, dangerous place and one of the worst, but now it is a crime-free city, and they assert that this can be done and can happen fast. The speaker states the goal to keep it that way. The audience is urged to seek help from the president, with the message that Chicago needs help and other cities need help. The speaker pledges to take whatever actions are necessary to achieve safety, declaring that they will make America safe again, including the big cities. The address concludes with a call for support and for decisive action to restore safety and order.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For far too long, Americans have been forced to put up with democrat run cities that set loose savage, bloodthirsty criminals to prey on innocent people. Really, very, very innocent people. In every place, they control radical left judges, politicians, and activists, and they've adopted a policy of catch and release for thugs and killers. In Charlotte, North Carolina, we saw the results of these policies when a 23 year old woman who came here from Ukraine met her bloody end on a public train. And here's a picture of it. This is the picture of it. And this is a picture of the woman, a beautiful young girl that never had problems in life with a magnificent future in this country. And now she's dead. She was slaughtered by a deranged monster who was roaming free after 14 prior arrests. We cannot allow a depraved criminal element of violent repeat offenders to continue spreading destruction and death throughout our country. We have to respond with force and strength. We have to be vicious just like they are. It's the only thing they understand. 24 of the top 25 most dangerous cities in America are run by Democrat mayors. 50 people were murdered in Chicago in recent weeks with hundreds being shot, and it's time to stop this madness. The people of our country need to insist on protection, safety, law, order. We have proven that it can be done because we did it right here in DC in District Of Columbia, the capital of America, was a bloodthirsty, horrible, dangerous place, one of the worst. And now it's a crime free city, and we're gonna keep it that way. It can be done. It can happen fast. All we want is, please, mister president, we need help. Chicago needs help. Other cities needs help. We'll do what has to be done because we're gonna make America safe again, and that includes our big cities. We're gonna make those cities safe. Thank you.

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

That entire day, many conservatives were talking about the death penalty for such murderers, even going as far as to say we should bring back public executions, quote-tweeting Trump's famous "public execution" tweet (that he made in 2013 in reference to the Boston marathon bombers). You will notice above that Josh didn't make his tweet until 6:05pm later that day. You can actually check quote tweets and see for yourself. Are we to believe Candace does not know how to do this? An enormous amount of people did the same thing, yet only Josh Hammer is being accused, why?

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

This is the horrific footage that many people watched on 9/9 that caused the outrage and response from the White House: https://t.co/23KgKGut0k

@theblaze - TheBlaze

HORRIFYING new footage of the career criminal who stabbed Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska on a train in Charlotte This is the future Democrats want for America👇 https://t.co/bCSMOmVYx4

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

To try and frame him of foreknowledge, you have to deny all context (both retweets prior were about Iryna) and disregard everyone else talking about it that day: https://t.co/77roycPHFt

@shalomshachna - Shalom Shachna

@RealCandaceO You are literally the world’s worst “journalist” His literally two tweets DIRECTLY before that one were BOTH about Iriyna….. You are an absolute moron 🙄🙄🙄 https://t.co/8gvwv1jnuC

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

Here is the screen recording of his timeline. It is the job of any “journalist” to verify facts before making insane conclusions. The context and the trending topic of the day clearly shows what he was referring to: https://t.co/FnUD2cOULf

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

Though you can debate the idea of whether we should bring back public executions, Josh has consistently stated throughout the years that he personally believes that “someone this monstrous deserves not merely to die, but to have his life taken in the public eye..” 👇 https://t.co/dqR6sCno9w

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

That being said, it makes perfect sense why he would tweet “public execution” on 9/10 AFTER it had just been announced by the FBI that the assassin of his dead friend was caught (though this later turned out to be the wrong suspect). Again, Josh Hammer strongly believes the assassin deserves not just the death penalty, but to be publicly executed:

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

False Claim #10: An Egyptian Air Force plane departed AFTER the assassination, suggesting it was a military operation involving foreign leaders. Reality: This false claim promoted by Candace Owens appears to come from her misinterpreting "UTC" (Coordinated Universal Time) as "Utah Time." The flight in question left BEFORE Kirk's assassination took place. Though she was community noted and admits the timeline error, she still insists that it must be connected. Yet, the idea that foreign leaders would orchestrate a military operation and physically travel to the future crime scene just for a secret meeting— instead of using secure digital communication and encrypted channels like VPNs or secure video conferencing—is not only illogical but absurdly impractical in the modern era. Such a scenario would be unnecessarily risky and sloppy.

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

False Claim #11: “Kirk was shot by a front row audience member directly in front of him” Reality: Independent experts Chris Loesch, Gary Melton, Matt Kestor and others confirm the official narrative that a front-row shot is infeasible because ballistic analysis shows a high-angle, downward trajectory from ~400 feet, matching the Losee Center rooftop, not a close-range shot. Video and audio evidence, including a 0.5-second supersonic crack and no muzzle flash in the crowd, rule out a nearby shooter. The entry wound's location (left neck) aligns with the roof's angle, not a frontal shot. Many of the vids also show people looking back and up towards the roof of the building.

@ChrisLoesch - Chris Loesch 𝕏

Yesterday, a shooter took aim at Charlie Kirk during his speech at Utah Valley University. The weapon: an older Mauser bolt-action rifle in .30-06 Springfield, fired from the Losee Center rooftop. Distance: 131–200 yards, per mapping and video evidence. The .30-06 is an old, trusted, flat-shooting round. From a 22-inch barrel, a 165-grain bullet at 2,700 fps drops ~2.7 inches at 131 yards, ~4.3 inches at 200. Used in WW2 and Korea sniper rifles, it’s deadly accurate at these ranges. Charlie was fatally hit in the neck. A sniper’s analysis backs up what I have been saying that the shooter aimed for the head but didn’t account for that drop. It’s a shot any novice hunter could make, but a pro adjusts for drop. This was an amateur with a dark motive not some super spy. The manhunt’s on.

BasedSamParker
Posted - October 20, 2025 at 12:03 AM
Saved - October 20, 2025 at 7:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I relay a thread alleging coincidences around the Charlie Kirk case: judges Lunnen and Graf with Israeli IP searches pre- and post-assassination, Graf’s gag order, and Mehtab Syed’s demotion amid White House links. I note claimed parallels to JFK/RFK/MLK cases—notable “Jewish involvement,” Vietnam war links, and big-funeral symbolism. I invite crowd-sourced parallels in the comments, stressing no official court narrative here.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

BREAKING NEWS, TYLER ROBINSON TRIAL: Tony Graf, the judge selected to preside over the Charlie Kirk assassination trial—and the judge he replaced, Robert Lunnen—were both the subject of unique Google searches from israeli IP addresses BEFORE the assassination (July 26 & May 15, respectively). Neither was the subject of any searches in Utah until AFTER the assassination. Judge Lunnen retired on August 1, & Judge Graf assumed his duties on August 4th—on or about the same day Mehtab Syed, the Special Agent In Charge of the SLC FBI field office, was removed. Just a bunch of coincidences? 1/ Sources in next tweet

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2/ Judge Robert Lunnen retired on August 1, 2025. He was replaced by Judge Tony Graf, who was sworn in on August 4th, after Graf was appointed by Governor Spencer Cox on May 2, 2025. Also notable, Graf formerly worked as a special assistant to the US Attorney in Washington DC. https://t.co/QSlDG2Pig1

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

3/ Neither judge was searched for from DC or Utah IP addresses before the assassination, only from israeli IP addresses: https://t.co/tJoF09bSRP

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

4/ Mehtab Syed's removal from the SLC FBI Field Office was announced in the media on August 5, 2025: https://t.co/uHanC67y6M

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

5/ Mehtab Syed's removal order likely came from Stephen Miller (✡️) of the White House. Notes and thread: https://t.co/QfMzNFeRVH

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

5/ The day Charlie was assassinated, The Guardian ran a story that the order to take action against the fired FBI agents in early August came from White House aide STEPHEN MILLER ✡️! Someone who isn't in any Department of Justice/FBI chain of command. What's interesting is that: 1) Kash Patel admitted that he was forced to make these changes if he wanted to keep his own job. 2) Kash acknowledged that the FBI would be sued over many of these firings and LOSE. Yet they were willing to do it anyway. Now, we get back to the case of Mehtab Syed: she wasn't fired--she was offered a DEMOTION. But why? There it is in black and white: the FBI was not afraid of firing agents, getting sued for it, and losing. Why didn't they take this approach against Syed? Why didn't they just fire her, too? Is it because they didn't want her case going to court? Did they not want that level of scrutiny in her case? Did they want it to quietly go away? No court, no case, no discovery, no scrutiny, NO SPOTLIGHT. BTW, don't notice the ethnicity of the guy who wrote this story. Curiously, this particular article mentions NOTHING about Mehtab Syed. Why not? Did he not want us connecting Mehtab back to Stephen Miller? Was Miller behind her removal, too?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

6/ Judge Tony Graf has issued a gag order on ALL witnesses in the Charlie Kirk assassination trial. https://t.co/8kOfsC6gNu

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

The Judge presiding over Tyler Robinson‘s trial has set an unprecedented gag order that has gagged every single whiteness that has been identified. https://t.co/FJf6qXR9RC

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses Tyler Robinson’s gag order and the possibility of someone calling him, citing Elizabeth Lane, a journalist trying to help Robinson get a new attorney. Lane says a phone call to Robinson is absolutely not possible. The video references Project Constitution claiming exclusivity and presents sensational claims: “Tyler Robinson breaks silence then hangs up fast,” a blurry “handers threatening him to stay quiet,” a seven-minute connected video call where Robinson’s face is blurred and an audio clip where he identifies the commentator and then “stone walls,” with family and friends trying to rally him and describing a “gag order or handlers warning him to shut the fuck up or else.” The video content includes a “post Kennedy hit” analogy and questions about Robinson’s defense, suggesting he won’t get a courtroom appearance and that the situation resembles a conspiracy. The video also presents a claim that Tyler Robinson’s wife has no say in his defense. Parallel to these claims, the transcript introduces a news-style segment with several speakers (Speaker 1, Speaker 2, Speaker 3) about Robinson’s latest court hearing. The hearing was brief; Robinson wasn’t present, listening from the Utah County Jail. Lawyers focused on evidence from the crime scene. There is a substantial amount of discovery. Robinson’s lawyers filed a formal appearance and did not waive the right to a preliminary hearing. Judge Tony Graff issued a gag order preventing anyone associated with the case from talking about it to avoid pretrial publicity, given the high-profile nature of the case in Utah. The judge aims to protect Robinson’s constitutional rights and the rights of the victim, and the court will rule on how to handle witnesses who have not yet been identified. The witnesses, potentially numbering in the thousands, include individuals who spoke to an audience of 2,000–3,000 students at Utah Valley University. As witnesses become known to each side, the information will be conveyed to comply with the gag order. Outside the courtroom, counsel declined to comment. A further hearing is scheduled in person for October 30. The initial speaker critiques the notion of a fair trial in Robinson’s case, asserting that Robinson was captured on numerous campus cameras during the incident, from entering the roof area to firing a shot and retreating, with a rapid sequence of movements and a subsequent drop-off of the weapon. The speaker argues that Robinson will not reach a courtroom and predicts he will be “Epstein’d” and removed, comparing the scenario to JFK and MLK assassinations and suggesting involvement by someone connected to Israel. The speaker claims that this is a “joke” and believes Tyler Robinson will die before trial, asserting that “nobody’s buying it.” The overall tone blends skepticism about a fair trial with conspiratorial accusations about the handling of Robinson’s case.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I wanna make this video, and I wanna talk a little bit about Tyler Robinson's gag order and why I don't think anybody's actually gonna get a phone call to Tyler Robinson. So I reached out to Elizabeth Lane. She's the journalist. She's actually trying to get Tyler Robinson a new attorney. And I showed her this video, and I was like, is it possible that somebody's getting a phone call with Tyler Robinson? She's like, absolutely not. So so Project Constitution says exclusive. Tyler Robinson breaks silence then hangs up fast. Blurry ghost on video. Handlers threatening him to stay quiet. Video call connected after seven minutes, but Tyler's face blurred like a frosted ghost. Just a set shadowy orange blob. Audio only clip below. He IDs me, then stone walls. Only family slash friends right now tried rallying him on the army for fighting for truth plus commentary cash. Hangs up. Boom. Ten minute call. Mostly silent. Attorney gag order or handlers warning him to shut the fuck up or else. Like Oswald, post Kennedy hit. Pinned in silence forever. I fear for Tyler's wife. And what the fuck? No say in his own defense, this scream set up. I agree with a lot of this. You know? Like, I agree with this the fact that we can't get him a new attorney and some shit like that. Well, people are actually trying to get a new attorney to him. And for some reason, the gag order shit is unprecedented. We've never seen it. But I just don't think that anybody's actually gonna randomly get a phone call into Tyler. If anything, I think Tyler's in on this. His family's in on this. None of this makes sense, and it screams conspiracy theory. I don't think Tyler Robinson is actually gonna see it to a courtroom. I think we they're gonna Epstein him and then obviously put him on a gurney and roll him out the back door and let him go on his merry way. He'll probably be over in Israel kicking it with Epstein, but I digress. I want you to take a listen to this. The attorney speaking or the the news explaining these type of gag orders and what these gag orders actually are and how many people are actually gagged involved in this investigation. Check this out. Speaker 1: Tyler Robinson's latest court hearing was brief, but some interesting things did happen, including one issue that could impact thousands of people here in Utah. Speaker 2: Good morning. Court is now in session. Speaker 1: Tyler Robinson was not present for the hearing. Instead, he listened in from the Utah County Jail. Lawyers focused on upcoming issues like evidence from the crime scene. Speaker 3: There is a a substantial amount of discovery in this case, your honor. It's voluminous to say the least. Speaker 1: His lawyers entered their formal appearance and declined to waive his right to a preliminary hearing. Judge Tony Graff has issued a gag order preventing anyone associated with the case from talking about it. It's to avoid pretrial publicity, already a big problem in a case with massive media exposure involving a high profile figure like Charlie Kirk, but the judge wants to ensure a fairer trial for Robinson. It's also brought up a big issue involving thousands of people. Speaker 3: We're seeking some clarification with respect to the phrase all witnesses, your honor. There are a number of witnesses that have yet to be identified, that will likely be used in the state's case. This occurred in front of two to 3,000 students at Utah Valley University. So we're in the process of identifying those witnesses. And so those individuals are presently unknown right now. Speaker 2: The court will rule that as the witnesses become known to each side that that information is conveyed to abide by this order. Obviously, there are potentially, many witnesses, and so it's not the expectation that you would be able to do that upfront, but as they become known. Speaker 1: The judge made it clear he wants to ensure Robinson's constitutional rights will be protected as well as the rights of the victim. Speaker 2: Counsel, regardless of who is watching, whether it is the nation or a single individual, We must fulfill our roles with integrity, civility, and diligence. I encourage each of you to give your very best to this case. Neither mister Robinson nor the people of Utah deserve anything less than the fair and impartial administration of justice. Speaker 1: Any comment? Outside court, lawyers declined to comment. Speaker 3: Any comment? Not today. Not today. Thanks, though. Speaker 1: Robinson will be back here in court in person for another hearing on October 30. Speaker 0: So you see what I'm saying? What do you mean a fair trial? Tyler Robinson was on camera on what? 50, maybe even a 100 different cameras every if he was actually there every second that the man was on campus, including him going through the stairwell, grabbing his rifle out of the bushes, getting up onto the roof, hopping over the railing, getting into the prone position, sprinting across the roof. And then after he fired that shot, somehow magically within three seconds, the dude was up in a full sprint across the roof. And then after he went and ran all the way about a mile and went and dropped off his weapon at some in the some magical drop spot in the woods, then he had to somehow sneak back to campus, get his vehicle, and then drive, and then make it to a coffee shop that was about a mile and a half away and do all that in under twenty minutes. But trust me, Tyler Robinson's gonna get a fair trial. He's gonna get a fair shake. Now if we talk about it, we might damage that investigation. We might wreck his chances of having a free and fair trial here in America. Tyler Robinson ain't make it to a courtroom, dude. They are gonna smoke this dude. They're gonna Epstein him. Nobody's buying it. Nobody's believing oh, sorry. Jack Posobic is still buying it. That guy still believes it, obviously. And all the people that go on podcasts and do interviews with him as well because, yeah, there's that. Sham, dude. This is all one big joke. Dude, this is gonna Epstein him. This is gonna be, like, just like JFK. It has JFK vibes written all over it. MLK, in comes the magical person, most likely related or connected directly to Israel. Takes a shot, takes out Tyler Robinson. Tyler Robinson's dead case closed. That's how it's gonna end up. We already know it. It's a joke.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

The truth about the Charlie Kirk assassination is going to come out one way or another. Just like the truth about the JFK assassination is coming out and there is nothing Jack Posobiec can do to stop it! https://t.co/8piWjQc07c

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 introduces the topic of Israel allegedly having influence over the US government and mentions that Israel assassinated JFK, pointing to William Cooper as the source who was also assassinated by Israel. Speaker 0 references Cooper’s book Behold a Pale Horse and notes that Cooper was the first to obtain original footage from a CIA whistleblower showing who shot Kennedy and how they shot Kennedy. He says the media’s clips started at a cropped frame, and that Cooper’s release prompted further questions. Speaker 1 explains that the assassin was the driver in the car with Kennedy, visible in a film with public help. He brings the film, saying it shows the motorcade on Elm Street in front of the Book Depository Building, Kennedy having been shot in the throat, Jacqueline pulling Kennedy toward him in shock, and the driver turning around with a pistol in his left hand, firing over his right shoulder and shooting the president in the head. Speaker 2 asks for a repeat and then the duo watches the film. Speaker 1 identifies the driver as William Greer, noting he was a secret service agent. He describes the weapon as an electrically operated gas-powered assassination pistol built especially for the Central Intelligence Agency, asserting there is no puff of smoke. Speaker 2 questions whether the weapon is indeed a pistol in the lower right corner of the frame. Speaker 1 confirms it is an air-operated pistol (pneumatic) and claims it fired an exploding pellet that injected shellfish toxin into the president’s brain, so that if the pellet’s explosion did not kill him, the toxin would. He states that he read all of this in the documents. Speaker 0 asks what type of weapon was used to assassinate JFK and references the 1963 time frame, saying that intelligence agencies would have such weapons. He then questions whether intelligence agencies could have used such weapons to assassinate Charlie Kirk. He suggests listening to Jack Posobiec and others who are “carrying water for this administration,” implying time will tell.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you're new to this whole just waking up to how much Israel controls our government thing, you're thinking to yourself, Ryan, Israel would never assassinate JFK, not a US president. Right? They're our greatest ally. And then I would tell you, well, have you ever listened to a gentleman by the name of William Cooper? He was also assassinated by Israel. This gentleman wrote a book called Behold a Pale Horse. You guys have probably seen that the pope just received a pale horse. Everybody's talking about a pale horse, but you might have missed this clip from William Cooper. He was the one who the first one to actually get the original footage from a CIA whistleblower that actually showed who shot Kennedy and how they shot Kennedy. The the clips that we are seeing from the media always specifically started at a specific point, and part of the frame was cropped out. But it wasn't till William Cooper released this video that we really started to ask a lot of questions. Check this out. Speaker 1: Said that the assassin was the driver in the car in which he was riding in Dallas on that day, and it was plainly visible in a film with help from the public. Speaker 2: Now you brought that film with you. Let's take a look at that if we can. Here's the film. Go ahead and narrate this for us, Will. Speaker 1: Well, it took me sixteen years to find this film because it has really been withheld, and what you're seeing here is the motorcade on Elm Street passing in front of the Book Depository Building. Kennedy has been shot in the throat, and Jacqueline is pulling him toward her trying to comfort him, and she's in shock. At this time, you see the driver turn around with a pistol in his left hand firing over his right shoulder and shoots the president directly in the head. Speaker 2: You need a repeat of it. Yeah. Speaker 1: The weapon watch the driver. His name is William Greer. He was, in fact, a secret service agent. The weapon is a an electrically operated gas powered assassination pistol built built especially for the Central Intelligence Agency. You don't see any puff of smoke any from That's correct. Speaker 2: Because you think is a pistol there in the right hand corner, lower right hand corner. Speaker 1: That's correct. Speaker 2: It is a say? Speaker 1: Well, it's an it's an air operated pistol. It's pneumatic. And it actually fired an exploding pellet, which injected shellfish toxin into the president's brain so that if the actual explosion of the pellet itself did not kill him, the toxin would. Now did you read all of this Yes. In in the documents? Yes. And that's why, his brain was switched for another brain in transit between Parkland, Hospital in Dallas and Bethesda Naval Hospital in Washington DC. Speaker 0: Wait. Wait. Wait. What type of weapon was used to assassinate JFK? And that was in what? Sixty three ish time frame? No way our intelligence agencies have those type Speaker 2: of weapons that could have Speaker 0: been used to assassinate Charlie Kirk, could they? Maybe we Speaker 2: should just listen to Jack Posobic and all those goons that Speaker 0: are carrying water for this administration. Time will tell.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

7/ Of the 5 finalists announced in April to be under consideration for the Judge Lunnen vacancy, Von Christiansen was also searched for from israel prior to the assassination! https://t.co/w6V0sKBiNH

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

8/ Background on Robert Lunnen, the outgoing judge. He worked for the US Dept of Justice for 21 years, including as an attache in Kabul, Afghanistan: https://t.co/A6hy5tdh1m

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

9/ If you want to send me info tips, my DMs are open. If you want to send me monetary tips, here is a link. X demonetized me a long time ago, so I do this for the struggle. BuyMeACoffee, Venmo, PayPal, CashApp & Crypto options are all available: Flow.page/SamParkerSenate

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

10/ Might redo this, but it holds up—The Deadly Parallels between JFK, RFK, MLK & CJK: https://t.co/nnOjM07ned

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

THE CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION CONSPIRACIES: ARE YOU JUST SEEING THINGS? One of the reasons people suspect a conspiracy behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk—including even a possible israeli/jewish role—is because they see similarities with other high profile assassinations that involved conspiracies with israel/jewish elements, like JFK's. But until now, nobody has really systematically listed these parallels. Here's my first attempt. What parallels do you see between these and the Charlie Kirk assassination? What did I miss? Are these parallels enough to justify having these conspiracy suspicions about Charlie's assassination? Or are we just seeing things? ▪️JFK▪️ 1. Lone gunman patsy ("Communist" Lee Harvey Oswald) 2. Shot in head in front of a crowd of people 3. Big event (Trip to Dallas, Parade, etc) 4. Irregularities & inconsistencies between eyewitness observed details of the shooting and the officially approved narrative of the shooting (TSBD vs DalTex vs Grassy Knoll; kill shot from front or back?) 5. "Magic" bullet theory 6. Medical report inconsistencies & subterfuge (botched autopsy, conflicting testimony, records tampering) 7. Straightforward jewish involvement (Dallas Citizens Council, led by jews, invited JFK to Dallas) 8. Weird jewish angle (Jack Ruby murders Lee Harvey Oswald) 9. LHO left behind notorious trail of documentary evidence, some of which may have been faked 10. Wanted to end Vietnam involvement (Vietnam was a war promoted by jews that benefited israel) 11. Tried to register AIPAC (AZC) under FARA 12. Was pro-israel, but also supported Palestinian Right of Return 13. Massive national event funeral with enormous crowds, television coverage, and powerful symbolism ▪️RFK▪️ 1. Lone gunman patsy ("Terrorist" Sirhan Sirhan) 2. Shot in head in front of a crowd of people 3. Big event (Just won the California Primary at Ambassador Hotel Celebration) 4. Irregularities & inconsistencies between eyewitness observed details of the shooting and the officially approved narrative of the shooting (Sirhan's shots came from the front & several feet away, while the death shots came from behind & close up; 10-13 shots heard vs only 8 bullets in Sirhan's gun) 5. "Magic" bullets & "Magic" shot (death bullets not a ballistics match for Sirhan's gun, kill shot came from behind, not the front) 6. Crime scene destroyed (the scene was not properly sealed allowing hundreds of people to pass through; key evidence such as the pantry door frames, ceiling tiles, and wood panels with possible bullet holes were destroyed or “lost” by the LAPD) 7. Autopsy report ignored (kill shots clearly came from behind, handwaved away at trial) 8. Weird jewish involvement (Press Secretary, Frank Mankiewicz—jewish member of the ADL—diverted RFK toward the pantry contrary to the prearranged exit through the ballroom) 9. jewish press first to establish the accepted narrative: that it was a case of Palestinian terrorism & hatred of israel (Jerry Cohen, LA Times) 10. Weird documentary evidence of the crime from the patsy (notes allegedly written by Sirhan confessing his plans to assassinate RFK; notebooks of Sirhan's writings used to paint his character to the public) 11. Wanted to end the Vietnam War (Vietnam was a war promoted by jews that benefited israel) 12. Tried to register AIPAC (AZC) under FARA 13. Supported right of israel to defend itself 14. Massive national event funeral with enormous crowds, television coverage, and powerful symbolism ▪️MLK▪️ 1. Lone gunman patsy ("Racist" James Earl Ray) 2. Shot in head in front of a group of people 3. Big Event (was in Memphis to support the Black sanitation workers' strike) 4. Irregularities & inconsistencies between eyewitness observed details of the shooting and the officially approved narrative of the shooting (some eyewitnesses say they heard shots from nearby bushes rather than the alleged boarding house) 5. "Magic" bullet (the fatal bullet failed the ballistics match to the rifle that was allegedly Ray's) 6. Crime scene destroyed immediately (within hours & into the next day, city workers cut down and cleared the brush where eyewitnesses placed a possible shooter, erasing any chance of testing whether a second shooter had been hidden there; bloody towels cleaned up; balcony not secured) 7. Cause of death/Autopsy inconsistency (multiple witnesses claim MLK was murdered while still alive at the hospital) 8. Weird jewish involvement (Ray's handler was a shadowy figure named Raul who was a known associate of Jack Ruby; Ray visited a jewish plastic surgeon the month before the assassination) 9. Weird israel angle (Ray assumed the identity of Eric Galt, the manager of a Union Carbide plant that manufactured bomb triggers for israel) 10. Straightforward jewish involvement (partnered with many jews and jewish organizations) 11. Wanted to end the Vietnam War (Vietnam was a war promoted by jews that benefited israel) 12. Had recently frustrated various jewish donors for his anti-war stance who turned on him and cut him off, to his consternation 13. Originally supported israel & scheduled a trip to visit, but then canceled it and began changing his views towards becoming more pro-Palestine 14. Massive national event funeral with enormous crowds, television coverage, and powerful symbolism 15. Death quickly and cynically exploited to get new laws passed that favored jewish agendas List the parallels you see to Charlie's assassination in the comments below. Let's crowd source.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@Mia_Stretch https://t.co/oDxhqsKPLR

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@Mindfullee How dare you point out the obvious conclusion!

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@dawvid6_david FR FR

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@OttoBraun1976 Always mocking us, the goyim.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@Tburdy @novaxnomask Lol. Nope. Try again.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@denise3kids7 I've noticed it often depends on whether you search from desktop or mobile and which time frames you use.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@joeligato That's why we have to make it count THIS time

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@kory_tams Gotta get in early!

BasedSamParker
Posted - October 4, 2025 at 2:16 AM
Saved - October 5, 2025 at 8:05 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a thread discussing the potential management of an investigation to protect a narrative surrounding the assassination of Charlie Kirk. I speculated about FBI Agent Robert Bohls, who became head of the Salt Lake Field Office shortly before the incident. I noted his recent move to Saratoga Springs, UT, near significant intelligence facilities, and his previous residences in Northern Virginia and Orem. While these connections raise questions, I emphasized that my points are speculative and encouraged others to conduct their own research.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

1/ CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION COVER-UP FOLLOW-UP (Disclaimer: this thread is for theorizing and research purposes only. None of this thread should be construed as a definitive assertion or accuasation. Do your own research.) How do you "manage" an investigation in order to protect a fake narrative? You would need a point man, right? Someone to manage & coordinate all critical points of information flow: evidence, media, law enforcement, intelligence community, possible foreign actors, etc. Enter: FBI Agent Robert Bohls, brand new head of the FBI's Salt Lake Field Office. He was installed just a few weeks before the assassination when Kash Patel unceremoneously relieved the former Special Agent in Charge, the "legendary" Mehtab Syed. What if I told you the internet lists a "Robert Bohls" as having moved to Saratoga Springs, UT, somewhere between March - June 2025? Literally down the street from the NSA's massive spying facility and also literally across the freeway/lake from UVU? Perfect positioning to help lead this "investigation" wouldn't you say? The same Robert Bohls has lived in the Northern Virginia area recently as well. That would match his known stint in Washington DC. Curiously, the same Bohls is listed as having lived in Orem several years ago. If this is the FBI's Robert Bohls, I find it noteworthy that he was acquiring housing a couple months before he was to be installed at the Salt Lake field office. Of course, this is all highly speculative. So, let's move on to what we know for sure.

View Full Interactive Feed