TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

Saved - October 22, 2023 at 4:34 PM

@Revelation2041 - Mad Mac

The Zionist jews aren't the real jews https://t.co/j7RQZe8CrL

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses a book written by Benjamin H. Friedman, a Jewish man, who challenges the belief that present-day Jews in Palestine are the true descendants of the Judeans. According to Friedman, they are actually descendants of the Khazars. He also claims that the word "Jew" was only introduced in the English language in the 18th century, and Jesus referred to himself as a Judean, not a Jew. The speaker verifies that the Latin words inscribed on the cross during Jesus' crucifixion support this claim. The speaker emphasizes that the term "Jew" has both religious and governmental connotations, while "Judean" is purely geographical.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But they claim they want to build the temple. Now, I want to discuss a little bit of sensitive history. And if I go to sensitive history, well, then I must quote sources that say it rather than that I say it. This is a fascinating book and the webpages are there, you can check it out. Facts are facts. This is a book that was written by A Jewish man and he confronted the thinking of many of the high placed individuals of the world. This is interesting stuff. In this book, Benjamin H Friedman, a Jewish man writes about the Jews and reveals an interesting history. He states that the present Jews in Palestine are not The true descendants of the Judeans, but rather descendants of the Khazars. In the letter addressed to D. David Goldstein of Boston, Massachusetts, a convert to Catholicism, The author Benjamin Friedman of New York City dated October 1954 provides some Fascinating insights. This is in the public domain. Let's study this for a while and see where we get. Benjamin H. Freeman claims that the word Jew was only introduced into the English language in the 18th century And that Jesus referred to himself as a Judean and not as a Jew. Inscribed upon the cross when Jesus was crucified were the Latin words, aesus Nazarenas Rex Iod Deorum, which means Jesus of Nazareth, ruler of the Judeans. Now this is fascinating. I went and checked it, And it is so. Yes, it happens to be so. Now the word Jew today has a religious as well as Connotation. You think of a Jewish entity, a government but you also think of their religion incorporated at the same time. Whereas the Term Judean is a geographic connotation.
Saved - December 16, 2023 at 11:53 PM

@Lucas_Gage_ - Lucas Gage

Man. I always say their religion is satanic, but I didn't know it literally is. Can anyone confirm this scroll is Jewish? https://t.co/slaAQ0S52K

Saved - December 30, 2023 at 8:41 AM

@EccentricVerse - Eccentric Verse

This world is controlled by a dark satanic cult. https://t.co/pxWEhHoayU

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are wicked people in the US government and spiritual warfare happening in high places. Many new world order clubs use an upside-down 5-pointed star as their symbol, which represents the goat's head. Washington DC was laid out in this pattern, with the White House at the bottom of the star. The $1 bill features the all-seeing eye and a pyramid, symbolizing the unfinished goal of a new world order. The date on the pyramid, 1776, is when the Illuminati was founded. The Illuminati, a group aiming for a one-world government, has resurfaced multiple times. In 1933, the 1st humanist manifesto was signed, with John Dewey, a key figure in the American educational system, promoting socialism and the New World Order.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But there are some wicked vile people in our government also and always have been. And there's there's spiritual warfare in high places, including in in the US government. Bible says in Matthew chapter 25, he shall shepherd divideth the sheep from the goats. Set the sheep on the right hand, put the goats on the left. Many of these new world order type clubs have the upside down 5 pointed star as their symbol. Very interesting. That's the symbol, the satanic symbol, representing the goat's head. The 2 horns, the ears and the mouth coming down, the 5 pointed star upside down. Satan worshipers all across America use this symbol freely and lots of their things have the upside down 5 pointed star. Very interesting to note that Washington DC was laid out this way. Here's one of the original maps of Washington DC. Notice the upside down five pointed did you ever wonder why the streets go so crazy in Washington DC? Why not just right angles like every other town, you know? Why does Pennsylvania Avenue go at such a weird angle? Well, it just so happens at the very bottom of the upside down five pointed star is the White House. They've got loads of these things, these secret things going on that the average person's never gonna catch. 1933, vice president Harry Wallace, who was an occultist, worshiped into the occult, decided to put the great seal on the $1 bill. Here's a picture of the great seal, the all seeing eye, and I take a lot of flak for this. People have argued for centuries, or for for decades, what this symbol represents. Let me tell you one of the theories. All right? The eye on top represents Lucifer, the all seeing eye. There's a gap between the eye and the pyramid, symbolizing their job of accomplishing a new world order is not quite done yet. Lucifer has not yet been installed as the chief cornerstone. Now see, Jesus Christ is actually going to be the chief cornerstone, but Lucifer wants to, you know, he wants that job. There are 13 rows of stones. Very interesting. There were 13 degrees in the blue lodges of the masonic lodge. Behind the, pyramid, on the dollar bill, you will notice there's nothing, desert. In front of the pyramid, you got things growing, some bushes and grass and things like that. This symbolizes that they think they will bring the world out of this desert, know, terrible times into a wonderful, you know, lush Garden of Eden type of thing. On the bottom is a date in roman numerals. Anybody know that date on there? Bottom of the $1 of the pyramid, 17/76, in roman numerals. 17/76 Here's of course a famous state in America, but it's also the date the Illuminati was started. A guy named Adam Weishaupt started a group called the Illuminati, the enlightened ones. That'd be a good quiz question there, Becky. Adam Lysop started a group called the Illuminati. They had secret meetings to decide how to control the world. Their group was exposed, and they went underground. It has resurfaced numerous times, and this of course, the the individual players die off, but the the the cause Continues. And they still have their plans for a heat, one world government, new order. 1933, the 1st humanist manifesto was signed. One of the signers of this was a guy named John Dewey. John Dewey is the father of our educational system here in America. John Dewey, I was in Vermont at a teacher's college. He was a humanist. He wanted, he claimed to be an atheist, And he said, I'm gonna take over the teacher's college, worked his way to became the top, and then he influenced all the People coming through that teacher's college, which later went out and became presidents of other teacher's colleges, and John Dewey had just an incredible impact on our educational system, leading it toward Socialism, communism, New World Order type stuff, which is where we are now.
Saved - January 6, 2024 at 5:59 AM

@realstewpeters - Stew Peters

Our REAL enemy has always been satan and his synagogue.🇮🇱 https://t.co/OUtahLBmB6

Video Transcript AI Summary
After 9/11, people were easily programmed to direct their rage towards Muslim extremist terrorists and Islam in general. It was convenient to have a clear enemy. However, mentioning that Israel may have committed war crimes and attacked the USS Liberty is deemed unacceptable and labeled as anti-Semitic. This inability to identify the enemy in the current war makes the situation very dangerous.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Think about this. When we were told on 911 by George Bush, the the criminal murderer, extremist Muslim terrorists were responsible for that attack. Think about the rage that that that inspired. And the rage was toward a group of Muslim extremist terrorists and then Islam in general. And I'm not defending Islam by any means, but that's how easily people are programmed. But, also, it was really easy to mention that that was the enemy. Right? So no. We've identified the enemy. Now Toby Keith is gonna write a song, and then we're gonna all rally behind George Bush, and we're gonna go bomb the out of Muslims. And everybody was like, yeah. Let's do that. Meanwhile, if you mentioned that, you know, the the secular nation state of Israel is responsible carrying out war crimes and murdering US naval personnel aboard the USS Liberty, torpedoing it no. You're not allowed to say that. That's anti Semitic. You cannot identify the enemy in this war at this time, and that makes it very dangerous.
Saved - February 10, 2024 at 12:29 AM

@Criter10n - 𝗖𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗼𝗻🏴🔻

Jews are next level delusional. https://t.co/yORWE6nBGY

Video Transcript AI Summary
In certain parts of Manhattan, there is an 18-mile fishing line tied to utility poles, forming an eruv, a symbolic fence for observant Jews. This eruv allows them to carry things from their private residences into the public domain on Saturdays, which is otherwise prohibited. Without the eruv, they would be confined to their homes, unable to carry keys, wallets, or even push strollers. The eruv is checked every Thursday by a rabbi to ensure its integrity. This concept was established 2000 years ago and is now present in over 200 cities worldwide.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In certain parts of Manhattan, you'll notice a fishing line hanging over your head that's easy to miss. So what's the point of this fishing line? Circling Manhattan from first to a 100 and 26th street, there's an 18 mile fishing line that's tied to utility poles. It's part of an eruv, a Jewish symbolic fence. According to one of the laws of the Sabbath, if you're an observant Jew, you can't carry things from your private residence into the public domain on Saturday. No keys, no wallet, no metro card, nothing. If you have kids, you can't push them in a stroller. Essentially, you're stuck at home. So the a roof symbolically stands your private residence into the public domain, so you can perform ordinary activities within this symbolic fence. This way, you have the freedom to carry around things without breaking the laws of the Sabbath. It's routinely checked every Thursday before dawn by a rabbi to make sure that it's intact. The concept of the eruv was established 2000 years ago to allow Jews to realistically follow the laws of the Sabbath, and there are over 200 cities around the world with similar a roofs. So that's kinda interesting.
Saved - July 4, 2024 at 8:53 AM

@jakeshieldsajj - Jake Shields

Israel is a country run by Satanists and demons https://t.co/y18Ka5NCLA

Saved - July 31, 2024 at 3:08 AM

@xbtGBH - GBH 🤡 ⚔️ Remilio

Literally a nation of Satan https://t.co/eHpQ9GX7DO

Saved - September 24, 2025 at 12:42 PM

@zadokq244514 - Zadok 💫

Rabbi talks about how Christian Zionists are so deceived regarding “Israel” and that Jews will never accept Jesus.. #MAGA #BibleStudy #Bibleverse #israel #antichrist https://t.co/8F60ejz0h4

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that “Christians evangelists here in America, which almost all of them are Republicans, they probably all gonna vote for Trump” and that they are “very poor Israel.” He says, without Christianity, the U.S. has little to do with Israel, noting “The only things they are helping us is because of religion reason.” He contends they’re “not doing it for us. They are doing it only for themselves.” He warns, “Make no mistake. They all believe that once we will go back to the holy land and JC Penny will show up to redeem the world, he will put us all to be burned in hell,” because “we've never accepted him, and we won't accept him.” He questions why “a lot of the people who made Aliyah, it's Christian money,” adding “They get hundreds of millions of dollars donation from them.” He says “the Messiah would come,” but “They just have the wrong identity of the Messiah. That's it. They believe that it's actually JC.” “They would dump all the Christian symbols you know well because it would be so obvious that it's all fake. Mhmm. Rabbi Thay”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Christians evangelists here in America, which almost all of them are Republicans, they probably all gonna vote for Trump. And they are very poor Israel. They are the ones that, thanks to them, United States always been with Israel in last few decades. If you take out Christianity out of the picture, what United States had to do with Israel? The only things they are helping us is because of religion reason. But what a lot of Jews do not know is that they're not doing it for us. They are doing it only for themselves. Make no mistake. They all believe that once we will go back to the holy land and JC Penny will show up to redeem the world, he will put us all to be burned in hell. That's what they believe because we've never accepted him, and we won't accept him. So why they wanna help us to take over Israel to win against the Arabs, make sure the Jews go why they pay all these organization that sponsor Aliyah? A lot of the people who made Aliyah, it's Christian money. All their affair, it's all come from them. There's some reform rabbis who have connection with them. They get hundreds of millions of dollars donation from them. Rabbis from Manhattan, from Texas. Why they are so generous? Why they donating money to Israel? What do they care about Israel? The answer is because they believe the Messiah would come. They just have the wrong identity of the Messiah. That's it. They believe that it's actually JC. They never watch my debate with a Christian professor. They would watch it quickly. They would dump all the Christian symbols you know well because it would be so obvious that it's all fake. Mhmm. Rabbi Thay
Saved - October 13, 2024 at 2:22 AM

@NinjaAlex420 - 忍者alex420

It's actually the Jesuits not the Jews https://t.co/7oKskECmS8

@_TruthZone_ - Truth Seeker

In case you needed anymore proof of who controls Trump... https://t.co/pqUAqrlOJF

Saved - October 27, 2024 at 12:15 AM

@realstewpeters - Stew Peters

The “Star of David” is NOT biblical, but it is satanic. https://t.co/0qYf0TYRqR

Video Transcript AI Summary
What is the Star of David? It is often thought to represent Judaism, but it actually originated as the Seal of Solomon. No Jews during Jesus' time recognized this symbol. It became associated with Jews in the 1600s in Prague. In the Bible, the only mention of a star used by the Israelites is in reference to false gods like Moloch and Remphan, indicating that it was a pagan symbol. God never commanded the use of such a symbol. Therefore, the Star of David is linked to false gods and is considered by some to be a satanic symbol, as Judaism is viewed as a satanic religion by those who oppose it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What is that? I mean, look at that. What what is the star of David? Is there a star of David in the bible? What is this? Speaker 1: There actually is. It's the seal of Solomon. Everybody just accepts that this this star represents Judaism. This is the star of the Jews. This is the star of David. No Jew in the time of Jesus would have seen such a symbol. It was only in the 1600 in the city of Prague that that star started to become this distinctive symbol for Jews, and now today, it's everywhere. In the acts of the apostles, Stephen preaches that, quote, ye took up the tabernacle of Moloch and the star of your God, Remphan, figures which ye made to worship them, and I will carry you away beyond Babylon. Speaker 2: The only time you have any mention in the Bible of the children of Israel using a star as a banner or taking up a star as a symbol, it is a false god. It's part of their pagan satanic version of Moloch or Remphan. They took up the star of their god, Remphan. God never gave them this and said use this. It makes more sense that it has to do with Remphan than the god of the bible since god never prescribed this. Speaker 1: Well, Remphan being not God would then be a false God. Speaker 2: Well, absolutely. The so called star of David is, of course, a satanic symbol because Judaism is a satanic religion. I don't care what symbol Judaism uses to represent itself. That's a satanic symbol.
Saved - December 24, 2024 at 10:18 PM

@badazn - 𝐀𝐫𝐭𝐡𝐮𝐫 𝐊𝐰𝐨𝐧 𝐋𝐞𝐞

𝐉𝐮𝐝𝐚𝐢𝐬𝐦 𝐢𝐬 𝐬𝐚𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐜.🩸 https://t.co/LfFSIgnsQz

Video Transcript AI Summary
Throughout history, certain groups have been expelled from societies due to their involvement in harmful practices like usury, pornography, and child trafficking. This has led to the belief that these groups engage in sinister activities, including the sacrifice of innocents. The narrative suggests that Judaism is viewed as a satanic religion that justifies these actions. It claims that various ideologies, such as feminism and communism, have been created to divide people, labeling others while promoting their own interests. The speaker argues that those who remain passive are complicit in the normalization of these perceived sins, suggesting a broader conspiracy involving power dynamics and sacrificial rituals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There is a reason images like these have existed throughout all of human history, and it's the same reason a specific demographic has been expelled from every culture and society on repeat over a 1000 times on end. The same people who created usury, pornography, child trafficking, sexual blackmailing, the military industrial complex, which is just a money laundering pipeline to delude the masses to fund genocidal levels of entitlement, are the same people sacrificing and torturing children for adrenalized adrenochrome. Because Judaism is simply a satanic religion that feels totally justified to sacrifice the lives of innocent men, women, and children for their amazing display of self proclaimed entitlement. This is a holy war, and those sitting on the sidelines not engaging or contesting with this fact are ultimately complicit in the normalization of sin and handing the keys to the gates of paradise to Lucifer along with the innocence of their progeny. These anti Christian Babylonians created feminism, communism, the LGBTQ Coalition, slave based fiat banking, abortion, and the ideology of supremacy itself with the separation of us being mere gentiles and them being God's chosen. Just look at how they create their own world. You're called a racist for admonishing every other race, but an anti Semite for them. You're called a supremacist for proclamations of any people, but they call themselves Zionists. It's a big club, and you ain't in it. And it's the same big club worshiping the black people Saturn, sacrificing to bail and Moloch behind closed doors through these demented art performances. And now the dark ages make total sense, and you understand the stories of vampires drinking the blood of the innocent and child sacrificing. His name is Lucifer and he has chosen the Jews.
Saved - January 3, 2025 at 1:51 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

WEF is ✡️ Synagogue of Satan https://t.co/Kn74WbfgO8

Video Transcript AI Summary
As you browse the Internet, algorithms monitor your eye movements, blood pressure, and brain activity to understand your identity. Imagine in 10 or 20 years, an algorithm could determine a teenager's position on the gay-straight spectrum. This raises concerns about privacy and the implications of such technology. What does it mean for personal identity if algorithms can define it so precisely?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As you surf the Internet, as you watch videos or check your social feed, the algorithms will be monitoring. The algorithm tracks your eye movements, your blood pressure, your brain activity, and tells you who you are. Now imagine the situation in 10 or 20 years, when an algorithm can tell any teenager exactly where he or she is on the gay straight spectrum. Violence. I think that, you know, it's more or less because what did he just say? Can tell any teenager exactly where he or she is on the gay straight spectrum. What the fuck just happened?
Saved - May 15, 2025 at 6:49 PM

@TheeDrGroyper - 𝔻𝕣. 𝔾𝕣𝕠𝕪𝕡𝕖𝕣 🇻🇦🇺🇸

The jews are not God’s chosen people https://t.co/lo6NMazr7b

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that several common beliefs about Jews are false: that they are God's chosen people, that Israel is their homeland, that they believe in the Old Testament, and that the Old Testament is about them. The speaker asserts that the term "anti-Semite" is misused, as Semites include Assyrians, Babylonians, and Persians, not just Jews. Abraham was a Hebrew, not a Jew, and God promised he'd be the father of many nations. The Abrahamic blessing passed to Jacob (Israel), whose son Judah fathered the Jewish people. However, Israel favored Joseph, whose sons Ephraim and Manasseh received the Abrahamic blessing. The speaker says that the Jewish homeland, Israel, was originally Canaan, inhabited by immoral Canaanites. After a civil war, Jews ruled Judea, while Joseph's sons ruled the Northern Kingdom of Israel. The Jews were later conquered by Babylonians and Romans, leading to revolts and banishment. The speaker alleges that Jews don't truly believe in the Old Testament, prioritizing the Talmud, which contains disparaging remarks about Jesus and Christians. The speaker concludes that the Old Testament isn't primarily about Jews, as many figures like Moses and Paul were not Jewish. The speaker states that the Bible encompasses the history of various nations, not just the Jews.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's a pretty known fact that the Jews are God's chosen people, that the Jewish homeland is Israel, that the Jews believe in the Old Testament, and that the Old Testament is about Jews. However, almost none of these facts are true. Nowhere in the Bible does it call the Jews God's chosen people. Modern day Israel isn't really the homeland of the Jews. The Jews don't really believe in the Old Testament, and only maybe 5% of the people in the Old Testament can even be considered Jewish. So now that you've branded me an anti Semite, we can begin. So the expression anti Semite literally means against Shem or his descendants. However, being anti Jewish isn't the same as being anti Semitic. So let me explain. The Semites are the descendants of a man named Shem who would father some of the world's most renowned empires and dynasties, such as the Assyrian and Babylonian empires, and even the Persians can call themselves Semites. So why is it when you say something against the Jews, you are considered antisemitic? Because just like stealing your religion, your homes, your money, and businesses, some Jews also love stealing names, inheritance, and land. So Shem is the son of Noah, the guy who built the ark when Mesopotamia flooded. The Samaritan kingdom would be destroyed by the flood, and the Semites would descend from the Caucasian Mountains and establish the Acadian Empire. Shem would have children, and one of his descendants would be named Eber. He would be the father of the Hebrew people, and the Semites would be called by his name. Eber's line would eventually give birth to a man named Abram or a Jew named Abraham, except Abraham has never been a Jew nor will he ever be a Jew. And to call Abraham one is just plain ignorant. So let's go through it. So according to the Bible, Abraham was a Hebrew and not a Jew, who God promised to be the father of many nations. Not one single Jewish nation, but many nations. And that through him, all the families of the world would be blessed. Abraham would pass this blessing onto his younger son Isaac and not his eldest son Ishmael. Isaac would have twin sons named Esa and Jacob. Again, the Abrahamic blessing would be passed down to the younger brother Jacob who would be renamed to Israel. Israel would then have 12 sons. His sons would each become their own tribes and eventually become their own nations. One of his sons would be named Judah, who would be the father of the Jewish people, and all Jews are related to him. Even though all Jews are Israelites, majority of Israelites are not Jews. Obviously, Israel would have to pass the Abrahamic blessing Judah in order for them to be the chosen people. Israel would want his favorite son Joseph to inherit the Abrahamic blessing. However, Judah, the father of the Jews would be jealous and conspire with his brothers to have Joseph killed. In the end, Judah sold Joseph into slavery for silver, much like Judah sold Jesus to the Jews. So the Bible portrays Judah as a jealous villain and Joseph as the chosen son. While in slavery, Joseph would rise to become the prime minister of Egypt and father two sons named Ephraim and Manasseh. In the end, Israel would adopt Joseph's sons and pass the Abrahamic blessing onto them, making them the chosen people and dividing Joseph into two tribes, making 13 tribes of Israel. As for the father of the Jews, his two eldest sons would die, and Judah would end up bowing down to Joseph. So now that you understand that the Jews were never intended to bless the world nor were they ever considered the chosen people, we can move on to our second point. So is the Jewish homeland Israel? And the answer is yes and not at all. Israel was originally called the Land Of Canaan, named after Noah's grandson, Canaan. The Land Of Canaan was conquered by the Israelites after they left Egypt with Moses found in the book of Exodus. The Bible says God commanded the Israelites to punish the Canaanites for their sexual immorality, which led to child sacrifice, which would eventually lead to cannibalism. The word cannibal actually comes from the words Canaan and the god Baal. Baal was the god of Canaan, and the priests were known for eating the children after they were sacrificed to him. Hence, why we call them can eat balls. So now that you understand what kind of people were living in Canaan, try not to feel so bad when you read that god ordered us to exterminate them. The borders of the Jewish homeland were established by Joshua who was one of the descendants of Joseph and not from Judah. So if we were to restore the Jews to their original land according to the Bible, the Jewish homeland would look less like this and more like that. So like the story of Joseph and Judah, their children likewise wouldn't get along either. After becoming nations, there would be a civil war. The Jews would rule the Southern Kingdom Of Judea, while Joseph's sons would rule the Northern Kingdom keeping the name Israel. They would have different religions, believe in different gods, and while Judah stayed in Judea, Joseph would ally himself himself with the Phoenicians and establish colonies and trade posts all over the Mediterranean. The kingdom of Israel would be corrupted by foreign ideologies, and like the Canaanites, would fall into materialism, sexual morality, and child sacrifice, which would lead to them being conquered by the Assyrian Empire. Some of the Israelites would be taken into captivity into the lands of Assyria and Midea, while some of the Israelites and Phoenicians would flee to their colonies and trade posts, fulfilling the promise made to Abraham that the world would be blessed through him as he would be the father of many nations. So the sons of Joseph would become fruitful and multiply among the nations, forgetting who they are, which shouldn't surprise us considering their names literally mean fruitful and forgetful. Just like the Northern Kingdom, the Jews would fall into sexual immorality and start sacrificing their children. They would be conquered and enslaved by the Babylonians, then freed and reestablished by the Persians, conquered again by the Greeks, and later occupied by the Romans. While under Roman rule, the Jews would launch the greatest revolution in Roman history known as the great revolt, which would fail causing Judea, Jerusalem, and the Jewish temple to be destroyed, ironically fulfilling everything Jesus and Christian said would happen. The Jews not being satisfied with losing their temple and homeland would stab the Romans in the back by launching two more rebellions, killing over half a million Greeks and Romans. God would bless the chosen people with two more humiliating defeats along with the banishment from the land, causing Judea to be renamed to Syria Palestinia. So the reason the Jews have been able to take Palestine really rests on the fact that they've stolen name Israel and have convinced the Christian West that they are the chosen people and that they alone are Israel. But once putting things into perspective, we see that just isn't true, which brings us to our third point. Do the Jews believe in the Old Testament? The answer is kind of and not really. While waving around the Old Testament as if they believe in it, the Jews actually have secondary books that they consider just as important, the main book being called the Talmud. To explain the Talmud, we have to understand some basic Jewish Roman history going back to emperor Claudius who, like emperor Tiberius, tried to ban the Jews from Rome after branding them aggressive troublemakers. Sadly, emperor Claudius didn't understand how to play the game of thrones and ended up mysteriously being killed. His successor, emperor Nero, would lift the Jewish band, which shouldn't surprise us considering the Talmud says he was a Jewish convert. Nero and his Jews would engage in some of the most barbaric acts known to man. Just to give you an idea of how crazy this pro Jewish Roman emperor was, Nero burned down Rome and blamed it on the Christians, causing them to be tortured and killed in the worst ways imaginable. He murdered his entire family, then kicked his pregnant wife and unborn child to death, and then castrated a young boy named Sporus and forced him to dress like the wife who he had just murdered. With the coming of Jesus, the Jews would divide into two main groups. Those who believe that Jesus is the Messiah, while the other group of Jews rejected this claim believing that their Messiah would come wielding a sword to destroy the Romans and set up a Jewish empire, which is what led the Jews to revolt against Rome in the first place. That and they just didn't wanna pay taxes. After their failed rebellions, the Jews would retreat to Babylon creating the religion we know today as Judaism, making Christianity older by about two hundred years. The Jews would argue and say that the Talmud is the oral law that was passed down orally without any mistakes since the time of Moses before finally being written down between two hundred and four hundred years after Jesus. This would place the Jews in first place above the Muslims for the longest most successful game of broken telephone ever played. The Talmud speaks of its love for Christians by calling the mother of Jesus a whore and calling Jesus a bastard sorcerer who is in hell boiling in human shit, which brings us to our last point. Is the Old Testament about Jews? The answer is no, not really. Because the Jews have stolen the name Israel, you would never guess that the majority of the people in the Bible are not Jewish. The apostle Paul, for instance, even though everyone calls him a Jew, Paul quickly separates himself from the Jews and says, I am an Israelite of the tribe of Benjamin. The Bible also says that God sent Paul to preach among the Israelites. And funny enough, Paul's ministry wasn't in Judea, but he was sent to preach to the Galatians in Asia Minor, the Greeks in Greece, and the Romans in Rome. The Bible is constantly separating the kingdom of Israel from the kingdom of Judah as it is constantly separating Joseph from Judah. The entire Jewish deception and hijacking of the bible depends on them stealing the terms Semites, Hebrews, and Israelites. For example, Moses, the man who wrote the first five books known as the Torah, did not come from the tribe of Judah nor was he part of the Kingdom Of Judea, yet somehow he is a Jew. The reality here is the majority of the people in the Old Testament are not Jewish. The Bible is a book that tells the history of many nations and peoples like the Semites, Hebrews, Israelites, Egyptians, Phoenicians, Babylonians, Assyrians, Armenians, Persian, Greeks, Romans, and many others. It's not only about Jews.
Saved - March 17, 2025 at 9:06 PM

@EniorJimenez - Enior

"El problema es el sionismo, no el judaísmo". Si crees eso, por favor, mira este breve video y luego hablemos. Literalmente: la religión del Anticristo. https://t.co/c51st6HWeE

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker presents a volume of the Talmud, the Steinsaltz edition, claiming it contains shocking and evil content that rabbis want to keep hidden. The passage discusses the ketubah, a marriage contract, and how its value differs for virgins and non-virgins. The speaker highlights a section that addresses scenarios affecting a woman's virginity status, such as intercourse with a man and a girl less than three years old, or a young boy less than nine years old with a grown woman. The speaker expresses outrage, stating that according to this passage, a Jewish woman could have a relationship with his ten-year-old son. He suggests that the Talmud promotes abhorrent behavior and questions what goes on in families that uphold it as a holy book. The speaker insists that this is not a debunked conspiracy, presenting the text as proof.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, I'm going to show you something so evil and so vile in this book right here, which I'll be showing you in closer detail, that's probably going to really shock you. And that is certainly something that the Talmudic rabbis do not want people to understand. They don't want people to know. What I have here is the Talmud, the the Steinsaltz edition, volume seven, tractate kitabud, part one. You can see it right there. I did a video on these a little while ago. The whole set, we have the whole thing. Cost us over $2,000 for this. And the fruits of this are going to start paying off. Mishnah, whatever the Hebrew is there, it has already been established in a previous Mishnah above 10 b, that a woman who is presumed to be a virgin at the time of her marriage is entitled to a ketubah of 200 denarim, whereas a woman who is presumed to be a non virgin at the time of her marriage is entitled to a ketubah of 100 denirim, a minna, whatever the Mishnah we are about to consider continues in its efforts to determine which women are considered virgins for the purpose of the ketubah, and which are treated as non virgins. If a grown up man has intercourse with a less than three years old. Are you seeing this? And they're not condemning this. Or if a young boy less than nine years old has had with a grown woman. Or if a woman has been injured by a stick and as a result her sorry about that has been ruptured. In each of these cases, the woman is entitled to a ketubah of 200 denarum when she marries. Okay? And you can keep on reading there. You can pause it and read it, if you really want to. Now, take great issue with that. My son, which I mentioned earlier, is 10 years old. And according to this satanism right here, a woman, a Jewish woman, could have a relationship with my 10 year old. And, if I was a Jew, hey, that three year old girl over there, she's really hot. Excuse me? And this is what these, Jews at the Torah Institute are learning. I'm gonna go learn the Talmud. I mean, maybe they're not all learning the Talmud and things, but a lot of them do. It takes seven years to go through this garbage. I wonder what kind of horrible things go on in these families, between these families, when their holy book right here that they deny the word of God to uplift this. And this holy book says, three year old girl. If you're a man, you're a woman, 10 year old or a nine year old. Excuse me. Nine year old boy. Oh, well, that's just conspiracy stuff. That's been debunked. We've done we've fact checked it, and it's not true. I just showed it to you. Overhead camera. Just showed you the page and the quotes. Right here.
Saved - April 15, 2025 at 2:07 PM

@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore

Judaism is not compatible with humanity. https://t.co/mNVDMD5C4Q

Saved - August 9, 2025 at 9:11 AM

@Use_Yandex - Use Yandex Search Engine for Anti Zionist searches

@jeffbeatty883 "Ukraine war is Jewish revenge, we Jews control Ukraine". https://t.co/rJX0r02EOr

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ukraine seems to be all about is called payback time. Ukrainians have been killing Jews for four hundred years. Ever since Komelniki in 1648 wiped out one third of European Jewry, and they've been doing a great job killing Jews. In fact, in World War two, they were more vicious than the Nazis. In fact, the Nazis had to say it, you know, they were well, we like the fact you're killing Jews. Let's show you how to be more efficient. So what's interesting is before the end of time, the banishment says, well, Ukraine has been especially active in killing Jews, so what I'm gonna do is destroy them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ukraine seems to be all about is called payback time. Ukrainians have been killing Jews for four hundred years. Ever since Komelniki in 1648 wiped out one third of European Jewry, and they've been doing a great job killing Jews. In fact, in World War two, they were more vicious than the Nazis. In fact, the Nazis had to say it, you know, they were well, we like the fact you're killing Jews. Let's show you how to be more efficient. So what's interesting is before the end of time, the banishment says, well, Ukraine has been especially active in killing Jews, so what I'm gonna do is destroy them.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript states that 'Russia has known many revolutions, but the most peaceful, quietest and most effective is the revolution created by Chabad's envoys,' and that 'the president is Jews without powers. Putin and Medvedev are members of the Chabad society and I am its leader.' It claims the enmity between Ukraine and Russia 'could have been started by Chabad supporters.' A quote from Hubbard Shnarsson's last roar, published in Slavienning, is given: 'First of all, we, the Jews, would dismember all the Slavic peoples, and there are 300 of them, millions, half Russians to small weakened countries.' It continues: 'The Ukrainian will think that he is fighting against the expansion of Russia, fighting for his independence. He will think that he has finally gained freedom while he is completely dependent on us, on the Jews.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The chief rabbi of Russia Melazar once said and his words were published openly, Russia has known many revolutions, but the most peaceful, quietest and most effective is the revolution created by Chabad's envoys. And he added that the president is Jews without powers. Putin and Medvedev are members of the Chabad society and I am its leader. It turns out that the enmity between Ukraine and Russia could have been started by Chabad supporters. For what? The answer to this question is given by a quote from Hubbard Shnarsson's last roar. It was published in the newspaper Slavienning. First of all, we, the Jews, would dismember all the Slavic peoples, and there are 300 of them, millions, half Russians to small weakened countries. The Ukrainian will think that he is fighting against the expansion of Russia, fighting for his independence. He will think that he has finally gained freedom while he is completely dependent on us, on the Jews. The Russians will think the same. They will defend their national interests. They will return the lands illegally taken from them by us and so on by us Jews.
Saved - July 6, 2025 at 8:28 AM

@ViceLitty - Not Sure Gnosis 🦈

People don't seem to know this but Stefan Molyneux is jewish https://t.co/8u32UhjXPb

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker's mother was born in Berlin in 1937 into a Jewish family. According to the speaker, this was the worst time and culture to be born into. She experienced the war as a young girl.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And not the part of Ireland that set out the Second World War, but the part that got intensely involved. And my mother was born in Berlin in 1937 to a pretty Jewish clan, and this was, of course, pretty much the worst time you could pick to be born and the culture you could choose to be born in. She went through the war, of course, as a young girl. Entire society
Saved - August 2, 2025 at 9:37 PM

@Use_Yandex - Use Yandex Search Engine for Anti Zionist searches

Just in case you had any doubt Israel is a Satanic project... 👇👇 https://t.co/0N3K5xhOQt

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states, "God bless Israel. God bless America." Speaker 1 asserts the need to make the people of the country love Israel more, stating, "They don't know what the fuck they're doing." Speaker 0 claims that it's only a few months, possibly a few weeks, before "they" get enough enriched uranium for the first bar.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: God bless Israel. God bless America. Speaker 1: We have to get the people of our country, of this country, to love Israel more. I have to tell you that. They don't know what the fuck they're doing. Do you understand that? Speaker 0: From there, it's only a few months, possibly a few weeks before they get enough enriched uranium for the first bar.
Saved - August 7, 2025 at 12:52 PM

@SaltyGirl09 - 𝕊𝔸𝕃𝕋𝕐 𝔾𝕀ℝ𝕃

Color me shocked.. The founder of The Church of Satan was Jewish. https://t.co/p0ITn9Fwe2

Saved - September 12, 2025 at 8:30 PM

@mistervermis - Gus

Shmuley finally admits to the public that satan dwells within him (and within all jews) A piece of honesty, coming from the Tribe. https://t.co/gOYHr4yO43

@mistervermis - Gus

The face of a demon https://t.co/M1d8IOtmJn

Saved - September 13, 2025 at 6:35 AM

@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore

There is no such thing as “The Star of David.” Take it off‼️ It’s a satanic trick just like Judeo-Christian is. 🎯 https://t.co/RYTWvRjAF5

Video Transcript AI Summary
Christians should never wear the Star of David, a symbol the speaker says represents Israel and the false religion of Judaism, and Christians have been deceived into wearing it to show support for Israel; this is 100% wrong. The speaker claims there is no Old Testament example of King David discussing or wearing the Star of David, and that the idea it might be Solomon’s seal is false and not found in the Bible. The Star of David, they say, is found in the Kabbalah—Jewish mysticism and esoteric teachings that are contrary to the word of God. The Bible only shows a star used when Israel rejected God and worshiped other gods (Acts 7:43). Therefore, the coronation of Israel using a star is 100% appropriate, while a believer in Christ wearing it is 100% sinful.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Christians should never wear the Star of David. Here's why. The Star of David is a six pointed star used to represent the nation of Israel and the false religion of Judaism. Now, unfortunately, Christians have been deceived into thinking that it's appropriate to wear such a star as a means of religious affiliation and support for the Old Testament nation of Israel. But this is a 100% wrong. And in fact, you can forge the Old Testament, you'll never find an example of King David ever talking about or even wearing the Star of David. And in fact, the assertion that it's possibly the seal Solomon is also false and is not found in the Bible. The Star of David is actually found in the Kabbalah, which is a collection of Jewish mysticism and esoteric teachings that are completely contrary to the word of God. Now the only time in the Bible that you'll find the children of Israel representing themselves using a star is when they would reject the God of the Bible and worship false gods. Acts seven forty three says, yea, ye took up the tabernacle of Moloch and the star of your god Remphan, figures which you made to worship them, and I will carry you away beyond Babylon. Therefore, for the coronation of Israel to represent themselves using a star is a 100% appropriate since they openly reject, blaspheme, and hate the Lord Jesus Christ just as their fathers did. However, for a believer in Christ to wear the Star of David is a 100% sinful since it represents a public rejection of the God of the Bible, which is Jesus.
Saved - October 16, 2025 at 11:05 PM

@Norambu3na - Norambuena

It's The Jews Again✡️ https://t.co/ax1XgdBTbv

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript centers on a speaker discussing Jewish identity and political figures through a controversial lens. The speaker first notes that “the small app people have occupied leading positions all around the world,” then immediately shifts to a claim about ancestry and religion: “So his grandparents would show you he's a quarter Jew. So he was a quarter Jew. He's a Jew. He's a Jew too. Still a Jew.” The speaker contrasts Halakhic law with genetics, asserting, “So according to Halakhic law, he's not a Jew, but genetics, you're half a Jew. You're a Jew.” This sequence frames a tension between religious criteria and genetic interpretation of Jewish identity as presented by the speaker. The discussion then pivots to a wife’s Jewish status, with the line, “Worst. Wife is a Jew, I thought, not him. His wife.” The speaker continues by suggesting that “a lot of times, some of these politicians are married to Jews, like Joe Biden's kids and Ivanka Trump, you know, that like, this is how it works with these creatures.” The term “creatures” is used in reference to Jews, marking a dehumanizing and antisemitic tone embedded in the remarks. The speaker adds a hyperbolic claim: “And by the way, this is mathematically impossible, just so you know. This should not even happen ever one time. The fact this is happening in multiple countries in our face like this, it just shows you what the fuck's going on.” The phrase “mathematically impossible” is repeated, underscoring a rhetorical insistence that the observed phenomena cannot plausibly occur, even though no mathematical basis is provided in the transcript. A brief interruption follows with “Other Jesus Christ.” Then the speaker remarks about another individual who “look[s] like one,” followed by “Oh, his wife.” The assertion “This is mathematically impossible, just so you know.” recurs, reinforcing the stated incredulity toward the claimed pattern. The speaker then mentions “Oh, even more Panama,” followed by “Based based Jews, bro. Don't you like to be ruled by Jews?” This culminates in the closing sentiment, “Yeah. This is incredible.” Across the remarks, the speaker weaves together ancestry-based claims, religious identity, and political marriages to assert a provocative, antisemitic narrative about Jews influencing leadership and governance, framed as inexplicable and extraordinary.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Says, the small app people have occupied leading positions all around the world. Interesting. Let's see this. Two minutes. Okay. So his grandparents would show you he's a quarter Jew. So he was a quarter Jew. He's a Jew. He's a Jew too. Still a Jew. So according to Halakhic law, he's not a Jew, but genetics, you're half a Jew. You're a Jew. Worst. Wife is a Jew, I thought, not him. His wife. Yeah. So a lot of times, some of these politicians are married to Jews, like Joe Biden's kids and Ivanka Trump, you know, that like, this is how it works with these creatures. And by the way, this is mathematically impossible, just so you know. This should not even happen ever one time. The fact this is happening in multiple countries in our face like this, it just shows you what the fuck's going on. Other Jesus Christ. This one's a new one. I figured he was true. That he looks like one. Oh, his wife. This is mathematically impossible, just so you know. Oh, even more Panama. Based based Jews, bro. Don't you like to be ruled by Jews? Yeah. This is incredible.
Saved - December 14, 2025 at 8:00 PM

@DigitalGermania - GERMANIA

"I believe thee entire concept of the devil is based off of the jews" -Bobby Fischer https://t.co/JeVww9RHHB

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 opens with a provocative claim: “Fucked up the world is. That's a form of insanity.” The remark sets a mood of frustration and chaos. Speaker 1 then shares a personal moment: after coming home, they wrote a poem about Robbie which they intend to give him. They describe a reaction where someone took away Robbie’s property and Robbie began to blame it on the Jews, adding antisemitic rhetoric as a result. This accusation is presented as a reaction to a loss of property, with antisemitism framed as a consequence. Speaker 2 counters by specifying: “Not someone. The government. US government.” They elaborate that “the government and the Jews are one and the same,” asserting an equivalence between the government and Jewish people. Speaker 1 questions this claim, acknowledging it as “True true” and “Absolutely true. That’s never been—,” but the sentence trails as Speaker 2 presses the point: “Ask the Palestinians. The good Jews. Right? Why aren't the good Jews talking against the bad Jews? The so called good Jews out there.” Speaker 1 concedes that “There are. Very good people.” and “Wonderful people.” Yet Speaker 2 pushes back: “Why they talking” and then demands: “Why aren't the good Jews screaming against the bad Jews?” Speaker 1 suggests the reason is disagreement with the premise that there are “bad Jews,” implying that those who disagree are not such good Jews. Speaker 3 interjects with a stark comparison: “I equate the Jew and the devil together. To me, they're practically interchangeable. And I think the Catholic church did also. I think the entire concept of the devil is based on the Jews.” They reference the New Testament story where the devil shows Jesus all the kingdoms of the world and offers them if Jesus bows down and worships, implying this is symbolic of control and obedience for worldly wealth. Speaker 3 continues: “This is basically saying you can have all the money in the world. Do what you want. If you just do what I tell you to.” They interpret this as symbolic of the Jew. They claim: “This is symbolic of the Jew,” and even assert that “the devil is based on the Jew” and that “old pictures of the devil” resemble a Jew. Across the exchange, the conversation cycles between attributing political and financial power to Jewish groups, questioning the morality of “good Jews” versus “bad Jews,” and then offering a provocative theological claim linking the devil to Jews as a source of cunning or worldly power.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fucked up the world is. That's a form of insanity. Speaker 1: When I come I came home last night, Robbie, I wrote a poem about you that I'm gonna give you. Someone took away from you your property and you began to blame it on the Jews. And coming out with all this antisemitic Speaker 2: Not someone. The government. US government. Speaker 1: And you came back on the Jews? US Speaker 2: government and the Jews are one and the same. Speaker 1: Oh, crap. That's a True true. No. Absolutely true. That's never been Speaker 2: Ask the Palestinians. The good Jews. Right? Why aren't the good Jews talking against the bad Jews? The so called good Jews out there. Speaker 1: Oh, yes. There are. Very good people. Speaker 2: Wonderful people. Why they talking Speaker 1: Absolutely unbelievable. Speaker 2: Why aren't the good Jews screaming against the bad Jews? Speaker 1: Probably because they do not agrees with you that they are not sadly bad. Speaker 2: Then they're not such good Jews. Speaker 3: See, I equate the Jew and the devil together. To me, they're practically interchangeable. And I think the Catholic church did also. I think the entire concept of the devil is based on the Jews. For example, in the New Testament, Christ took rather, the devil took Jesus to a high mountain. Right? And he showed him all the kingdoms of the world. And he said, I will I will give you all of this if you will just bow down and worship before me. Right? So and then Jesus refused. So what the point is, this is who can offer you all of this? This is this is basically saying you can have all the money in the world. Right? Do what you want. If you just do what I bow down and worship, do what I tell you. This is symbolic of the Jew. Just obey me and you will have everything. So the the the the the devil is based on the Jew. And if you look at the old pictures of the devil, he even looks like a Jew.
Saved - February 10, 2026 at 1:20 AM

@Norambu3na - Norambu

✡️It's Jewish Supremacy https://t.co/A4V6oWqDUA

Saved - February 17, 2026 at 12:14 AM

@Norambu3na - Norambu

✡️ It's a Zionist Cabal https://t.co/daInwQnbL5

Video Transcript AI Summary
A former Houston Rockets player recalls a pivotal moment from a couple of years ago when he tweeted “free Palestine.” He says that as a result, he damn near got kicked out of the league. Immediately after posting the tweet, he received a call from the commissioner of the NBA, and people working with his foundation in Texas urged him to erase the tweet, insisting he would get in trouble. He wondered what he had done that was so bad. The other speaker asks for an explanation, prompting the first speaker to reflect on why he faced such a response. He explains that he went against the grain by saying something people didn’t like, and that led to repercussions. He emphasizes that it wasn’t just that “people didn’t like” it, but that the reaction was strong enough to force him to consider backing down. He describes a period when he was in a leadership position and felt that if he said too much, he might lose his job. This created a climate where he stopped trusting anyone, leading him to decide not to say anything or do anything. He notes that this silence became a problem because others began speaking for him. Over the years, he says, it felt like he had to choose between staying silent or letting others voice opinions about him. He concludes that he eventually chose to speak for himself, deciding, “I’m a speak and that’s the end of it.” The dialogue underscores a tension between personal beliefs, public expectations, and professional risk, highlighting the pressure he felt to conform versus his determination to stand by what he believed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A couple years ago when I played for the Houston Rockets, I tweeted free Palestine. I damn it, got kicked out the league for it. And I'm, like, trying to figure out why. So I tweet free Palestine. Less than ten minutes after I tweet that, I get a call from the commissioner of the NBA. People, like working with my foundation at the time, Texas, you gotta erase this tweet. You gotta take this down. You're gonna get it I'm like, what did I do that was so bad? Speaker 1: Can somebody explain to me? Speaker 0: Yeah. Can somebody explain, you know? And it was just like because I went against the grain. I said something that people didn't like and I, you know, now Speaker 1: Not people didn't like. They Speaker 0: didn't like. So now it's like I gotta stand on what I believe and how I feel and not go back on it. Yeah. And when you're in the lead, be in that place where if I say too much, if I say something, I may not get a job no more. And then I just got to a place where I couldn't trust nothing of anybody. So it's like, I'm not gonna say nothing, do nothing. And then that was a problem too because now other people are speaking for me. Over the years, it's like, you know what? Either say how you feel or let people say how they feel about you and you don't do nothing. I'm like, no. I'm a I'm a speak and that's that's the end of it.
View Full Interactive Feed