TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

michaelpsenger
Posted - March 5, 2022 at 12:19 AM
Saved - April 15, 2024 at 12:23 PM

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

Walensky: “When the CNN feed came that it was 95% effective, the vaccine, so many of us wanted it to be helpful, so many of us wanted to say, ‘Ok this is our ticket out.’” Ok… But then you got millions fired and excluded from society for not taking it. https://t.co/Xcl7bUUrOi

Video Transcript AI Summary
We were all hopeful when we heard the vaccine was 95% effective, thinking it was our way out. But maybe we were too optimistic and not cautious enough. We didn't consider the possibility of the vaccine wearing off or being less effective against future variants.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can we have improved? Well, you know, I think I can tell you where I was when the CNN feed came that it was 95 percent effective on the vaccine. So many of us wanted to be helpful. So many of us wanted to say, okay. This is our ticket out. Right? Now we're done. So I think we had perhaps too little caution and too much optimism, for some good things that came our way. I I really do. I I think all of us wanted this to be done. Nobody said waning when when, you know, oh, this vaccine is gonna work. Oh, well, maybe it'll work. It'll wear off. Nobody said, well, what if the next variant doesn't it doesn't it's not as potent against the next variant.
TheChiefNerd
Posted - June 7, 2023 at 10:26 AM
Saved - July 13, 2025 at 10:28 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read 'Dissolving Illusions' and it made me rethink my views on vaccines. I used to believe the polio vaccine was the key to ending the epidemic, but now I have more questions. I sense there's a deeper story behind the narrative we've been told about vaccines being a miracle cure.

@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd

🚩 Joe Rogan Read 'Dissolving Illusions' and Now Has More Questions About Vaccines "It's widely credited that the polio vaccine is what stopped that [epidemic]. I used to wholesale believe that until this pandemic and now I question everything...I have a feeling that there's a lot more to the story than what the general narrative is that we've been given, that vaccines are this amazing cure." @joerogan @TheoVon

Video Transcript AI Summary
DDT was in widespread use as a pesticide when polio cases were prevalent. DDT is no longer used in America, but it is still used in other countries where polio-like symptoms are common. One of the effects of DDT poisoning is polio-like symptoms, called encephalopathy. Polio was something that was going on in the early part of the twentieth century, and it's widely credited that the polio vaccine is what stopped that. The speaker questions the general narrative that vaccines are an amazing cure. They believe there are other factors, such as hygiene. The book "Dissolving Illusions" is about the origins of vaccines, what vaccines have done to stop disease spread, and the negative side effects. There are side effects to vaccines, and they don't want to advertise those problems. One person was addicted to the COVID vaccine and did seven inoculations. A doctor told a lady in the neighborhood to stop getting boosted, but she wanted to go to LA to get boosted.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A lot of the cases of polio that we talk about from back in the day Mhmm. DDT was in widespread use back then, widespread use as a, pesticide. And they were using DDT to kill bugs that they thought carried diseases. But the problem is DDT exposure is insanely toxic. Now we know that. Now DDT, they don't use it anymore in America. Yeah. But they still use it in other countries where polio like symptoms are very prevalent. One of the side effects one of the effects of DDT poisoning is polio like symptoms. I think it's called encephalopathy. See what that is. DDT side effects. Speaker 1: We didn't have a lot of polio, I don't think, in our area. Speaker 0: Well, polio was something that was going on in the early part of the twentieth century. You know? And it's widely credited that the polio vaccine is what stopped that. I used to wholesale believe that until this pandemic, and now I question everything. Now I'm like, I don't know. I don't know what the truth is with whether it's smallpox or polio. I I have a feeling that there's a lot more to the story than what the general narrative is that we've been given. They said vaccines are this amazing cure. I think there's a lot of other factors, And I think one of the other factors was hygiene, and it's the book is called dissolving illusions, and it's all about the, origins of vaccines and what vaccines have done to, you know, stop disease spread and what the negative side effects have been. And it's just like, there's a lot of negative side effects, man. And to pretend that it's safe and effective Mhmm. Like, when you're administering things to millions, if not hundreds of millions of people, like, there's gonna be some problems, and they don't want to advertise those problems. They they don't want to make those problems publicly known. Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. There's side effects. Yeah. You can't fucking can't whisper. You can't see far. There's all kind of fucking side effects. Dude, we had a guy who broke into, Walgreens and did, like, seven, he was addicted to the fucking COVID vaccine. He did, like, seven inoculations. Speaker 0: I got a lady in my neighborhood that keeps getting boosted. Her doctor told her, stop getting boosted. Doctor's like, no more. She's like, I gotta go to LA. I need to get boosted. The doctor's like, it's enough.
KanekoaTheGreat
Posted - August 4, 2023 at 8:06 PM
Saved - August 5, 2023 at 2:53 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Overwhelming evidence suggests manipulation in the lab leak and collusion to distort the narrative. Concerns arise for vaccine-injured children with potential myocarditis and shortened lifespan. Mandating vaccines for kids despite knowing it lacked efficacy in stopping transmission raises alarming questions.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

.@JoeRogan: "There's overwhelming evidence we've been f--ked with. Just the lab leak... When you see the gain-of-function emails that Fauci sent to those scientists. There's clear collusion to distort the narrative. That's scary shit... If you have a child that got vaccine injured and you worry that your child has myocarditis now and their life span has shortened, and they might be dead in ten years. That's f--kin terrifying... Especially when you consider they tried to mandate it for kids when they knew this wasn't deadly for kids, and they also knew that it didn't stop transmission... They knew it didn't stop transmission. It was all lies."

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are concerns about the credibility of certain individuals who are involved in distorting the narrative. The evidence of a lab leak and the gain of function emails from Fauci to other scientists raise alarming questions. It is unsettling that these are the people we trust with our lives. For parents whose children may have suffered vaccine injuries, the fear of myocarditis and shortened lifespans is terrifying. It is even more troubling that the vaccine was pushed for children despite knowing it wasn't deadly for them and didn't prevent transmission. The truth was concealed.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When those guys flip, that's problematic. Well, I think they're flipping. I agree. Yeah. I agree. I think the overwhelming evidence that we've been fucked with, like, just the lab leak thing, just that alone. When you see the gain of function emails that Fauci was sending to those other scientists, and that there's there's some clear collusion to try to distort the narrative, that's scary shit. That's scary shit that these are the people that we trust our lives to. And when, you know, if you have a child that got vaccine injured and you worry that your child has myocarditis now and their lifespan is shortened, they might be dead in 10 here's Yeah. That's fucking terrifying, especially when you consider the fact that they tried to mandate it for kids when they knew that this wasn't deadly for kids, and they also knew that it didn't stop transmission. They knew it. That's right. They knew it didn't stop transmission. It was all lies.
KanekoaTheGreat
Posted - August 4, 2023 at 8:41 PM
Saved - August 5, 2023 at 3:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Joe Rogan expressed his strong reaction to Robert Kennedy Jr.'s book, "The Real Anthony Fauci," highlighting disturbing experiments on New York foster kids with vaccines. This revelation made him question the honesty of vaccine regulators and the potential side effects. He believes profit motives may overshadow public health concerns. Shockingly, none of the 72 mandated vaccines underwent rigorous safety trials. The lack of accountability and transparency is deeply concerning.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

.@JoeRogan on @RobertKennedyJr: "I read his book The Real Anthony Fauci... It's a f--kin insane book. I cannot recommend that book enough... When they talk about experimenting on New York foster kids with vaccines and how many of them died... It's f--kin horrible... I got furious at the regulators... Furious at Fauci. Furious at these f--kin psychopaths that were involved in this. It makes you reconsider everything... I know a lot of people, including myself, who were staunchly pro-vaccine... Now I don't think they are honest... I'm not saying vaccines are bad, but I am saying I do not think they are honest... I don't think they are honest about the side effects. About the repercussions. I think there is a massive interest in making money, and the more vaccines you give people, the more money they make... The fact that there is this immunity from prosecution... All that is f--kin crazy. The fact that none of the 72 mandated vaccines have gone through double-blind placebo-controlled vaccine safety trials. It's f--kin terrifying..."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the reaction to RFK and the controversy surrounding vaccines. They mention a book called "The Real Anthony Fauci" and express anger towards regulators and those involved in unethical vaccine experiments. They question the honesty of vaccine manufacturers and express concerns about the lack of safety trials for mandated vaccines. The speaker also criticizes Mark Cuban's stance on vaccines and suggests he has a vested interest. They conclude by stating that the Left may find Cuban to be a suitable candidate.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The reaction to RFK, which is pre was pretty wild. And, you know, he's a a pretty serious underdog, but the the blowback was wild. Wild to see. And, specifically about vaccine stuff, and then, you know, the Peter Hotezes and all the people that say that he's dangerous, like, Come debate him, and they wouldn't they did not want to debate him. He I I wanted to have him on because of his book, because I read the real Anthony Fauci. And if that book is accurate Speaker 1: first Speaker 0: of all, if it's not accurate, how is he not being sued? I think it is that. What a book. It's a fucking same shit like a book. I cannot recommend that book enough, but I also should say that it's very depressing. And I listened to that book in the sauna, like, so I was particularly tortured while I was listening to it because I'm listening to it. It's a 185 degrees in the sauna while I'm listening. And, I went for days where I had to not listen to it. I just listened to fiction because I just couldn't I just didn't wanna absorb it all when they're talking about What they did with the foster kids in New York with the experimenting vaccines on them and how many of them died, it's fucking horrible. Did you get angry? Speaker 1: Did you get the rage? That's because that's what I got. Speaker 0: Yeah. Furious. As furious at the regulators, furious at the people that allowed it to happen, furious at Fauci, furious at this fucking psychopaths that were involved in this. It's it's horrible, and it makes you reconsider everything. I know a lot of people that were and me myself were staunchly pro vaccine. Said vaccines are one of the most important, health innovations in in human history, and now I look at it differently. Now I look at it like I don't think they're Honest. I don't think they're honest about everything. I'm not saying vaccines are bad, but I'm saying I do not think they're honest. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: I don't think they're honest about the side effects. I don't think they're honest about the repercussions. And I think there is a massive interest in making money, and the more vaccines you give people, the more money they make from them. The fact that there's this immunity to prosecution, all that is fucking crazy. The fact that none of the 72 mandated vaccines have gone through, vaccine safety trials, gone through double blind placebo controlled studies, that it's fucking terrifying. And the when he talks about that and and Fauci says that's not true, and then he asked Fauci to give him the information. He said, I'll send it to you. And then after a while they had to admit it doesn't exist. There is no there are no safety trials for the mandated vaccines for children. Speaker 1: You know, and you ask people, have you read the book? How would I read it? It's a conspiracy theory. I don't want I wouldn't want to read a book by a guy like that. I said, if it's so wrong, If you go on Amazon, I don't know how many reviews it's got Jamie right now on Amazon. That book, Fauci's book's got 30,000 plus reviews. He sold a couple 1000000 copies. And it's not like it went through Simon and Schuster or Penguin or anything like that. Right? Speaker 0: Word's mouth. Yeah. Speaker 1: So how come no one's How come no one's questioning it? How come no one's tearing it apart? How come no one's sitting there saying when I first bought the book, I think it's like 6 or 700 pages. I'm like, dude, I don't I don't have time to go through a 700 page book right now. Then I made the mistake of start reading. There's 5 more pages. Ten more pages. 20 more pages. Yeah. 23,800. Insane. Speaker 0: Yeah. Insane. That's insane. Star. Look at that. It's 5 star. That is unbelievable. Are 4.8 stars that have sold millions Speaker 1: of copies. Ridiculous. Yeah. So so by the way, what do you think about Mark Cuban? Cause I know Mark responded and, you know, he said what you guys are doing is exactly what mainstream is doing. You know, that whole exchange with Mark. Speaker 0: And he also advertised His drug company just came tweet. Yeah. Fuck out of here with that. I know about his exchanges with, Revolvera And, the, Rav Aurora, the, the young journalist and the the different, exchanges they've had back and forth, I don't think he knows what he's talking about. I don't think he's know he knows what he's talking about about the side effects. I don't think he knows what he's talking about, the dangers of myocarditis. The idea that it's like nothing and it goes away quickly, it's not true. No no. I don't think he's accurate. I don't think he's right. I think he has a vested interest in his position. He's had that position for a long time, The position of mandating vaccines for his players, I think, you know, that's his that's his place. That's his stance. I don't agree with it, But, you know, I met the guy before. I like him. I liked him when I met him. He's a nice guy. Yeah. Communicated with him in the past about other things. But I think, you know, he has a very specific mindset. Speaker 1: I think the Left, that's a good candidate for the Left. If they want a guy like that, I think they'd be a good candidate for him.
DrJBhattacharya
Posted - August 9, 2023 at 1:58 AM
Saved - August 9, 2023 at 11:39 PM

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

Did governments and public health know that the vax doesn't stop covid transmission? If so, why did they push mandates and vax discrimination anyway? Can we trust these institutions again? Russell Brand (@rustyrockets) has answers!

VigilantFox
Posted - September 2, 2023 at 9:41 PM
Saved - September 7, 2023 at 9:28 PM

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

.@JoeRogan Gives @BillMaher a Lesson on Why Ivermectin Had to Be Destroyed "In order to utilize the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), they had to have no other remedies, no other effective treatment ... They didn't want any sort of way that you could get over this without taking their medicine."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the politicization of Ivermectin, an antiparasitic drug that also shows potential in stopping viral replication. They mention its success in treating yellow fever and winning the Nobel Prize. They express confusion over why a drug would be demonized and politicized. The conversation touches on the motivations behind this, including the desire to create a monopoly for vaccines and the Emergency Use Authorization Act. They highlight the affordability and accessibility of Ivermectin, which can be manufactured by anyone and costs only 7¢ per dose. The speakers also mention the discouragement and suppression of alternative treatments like monoclonal antibodies.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I mean, what about the way they demonize the Ivermectin thing? Yeah. I mean, it's a drug, not a politician. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: I I mean, why that something like that would ever become politicized, especially a drug that I believe when it first came out in 2015, was it? I think it won the Nobel Prize, the guy? Oh, okay. I I think it it wiped out some disease in Africa. Speaker 1: Yellow fever. Speaker 0: A yellow fever. Speaker 1: It's a it's an antiparasitic, but it shows it stops viral replication in vitro. It does have some sort of an effect, and there's we're I'm actually gonna Debate about it with this scientist and another guy who doesn't believe in it. It's a fascinating thing because Speaker 0: It's like getting mad at Sprint. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: It's not if it works for you and it plainly works for some people and works on a lot of things, I I I just don't understand that mentality. Speaker 1: Well, you know why they did it. Right? Speaker 0: Well, I mean, it certainly was important if you wanted to Create a monopoly for the vaccine. Speaker 1: Well, not just a monopoly, but the Emergency Use Authorization Act. In order to you to utilize the Emergency Use Authorization, They had to have no other remedies. There was no other effective treatment. And so any effective Treatment specifically, one that was, I mean, at the time, COVID or, Ivermectin rather had been around long enough that it was generic. So no one owned the patent on it. So anyone can manufacture it. It was, like, 7¢ a dose. It's nothing. It costs nothing. Speaker 0: Well, we can't have that. Speaker 1: We can't have that. No. And that that's also why they tried to discourage and then eventually suppress people from getting Monoclonal antibodies. They didn't want any sort of way that you could get over this without taking their medicine.
Inversionism
Posted - October 1, 2023 at 8:00 PM
Saved - October 2, 2023 at 3:46 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Vaccines are often hailed as a medical breakthrough, but let's not overlook the risks. The CDC lists ingredients like aluminum, insect repellent, formaldehyde, and mercury in vaccines. Prominent figures fear speaking out due to backlash. We must break free from the web of lies and prioritize truth. Vaccines can have severe consequences, including autoimmune conditions, neurological disorders, and mental illness. The presence of mercury and aluminum in vaccines may contribute to these issues. Could vaccine-induced brain damage be a factor? It's worth considering.

@Inversionism - Inversionism

"To present it as this genius medical advancement.... no it's actually a risky medical procedure that begs long term cost benefit analysis. I mean if you don't believe me, look on the CDC website as to what is in the vaccine. You know... Aluminum, insect repellent, formaldehyde, mercury, that's right on their website, don't take it from a talk show host" @billmaher was once incredibly based on vaccines and not trusting pharma and the US healthcare system, but they came down on him hard for what he said here on his show, so he never mentioned it again. Fear of the MSM and government wrath is why so many people of prominence and influence don't get to say what they truly believe in many areas, especially vaccines. Once you reach a certain point of influence and notoriety, you cannot say things like this. Since COVID, people are definitely caring less and less what the MSM has to say, but we're still stuck partially stuck in their web of lies and fearful of the manufactured outrage on many topics and issues. I wish people would just start speaking their complete unfiltered mind again and care more about objective truth. I think the objective truth is all vaccines are incredibly dangerous and cause grievous injuries far more than anyone could ever know, especially autoimmune conditions, neurological disorders like autism/ADHD/etc, and chronic mental illness. Mercury and aluminum in the brain can undeniably make you crazy, and we've been injecting those toxins into babies and children for DECADES. It's no wonder the current young generation is so dysphoric, crazy, sick, and generally insufferable to interact with currently. What if they all have genuine vaccine induced brain damage from the mercury injection they got when they were babies/children? Something to think about...

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker addresses criticism received regarding a previous discussion on healthcare. They clarify that they are not a germ theory denier and understand the theory of inoculation. However, they express concerns about the risks and long-term effects of vaccines, citing ingredients like aluminum, insect repellent, formaldehyde, and mercury listed on the CDC website. The speaker questions the definition of good health and argues for a debate on the topic. They mention the importance of considering medical errors, prescription drugs, and profit motives in healthcare. The conversation ends with a mention of the seriousness of the swine flu and the efforts being made to develop vaccines.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Before we Speaker 1: move on from health care, I want to address some of the criticism I got this week from what we were talking about last week on the show with doctor Bill Frist. Speaker 2: People criticize you? Speaker 1: Well, yes. Including the you know, they they said I was crazy in the New York Times on Monday, and yet I saw an article there today on the front page entitled swine flu shots Revive a debate about vaccines. So I was crazy on Monday, but now it's a debate a debate on Friday. Good. That's all I'm saying is we should have a debate. And and let me just clear up a few things that people have been writing about me that are not true. I am not a germ theory denier. I understand that germs and viruses cause diseases. I may have been a little cocky about it because I discovered from firsthand experience That I could stave them off better with proper nutrition as opposed to how I used to do it with NyQuil. I also would like to say that I I do understand the theory of inoculation. Yes. You give someone a little bit of the disease It fools your body into providing antibodies, which fight it. Brilliant. Bravo. Maybe there are some occasions where an inoculation, is a wise thing to do. I hope not. I hope I would never have to have one because, you know, to present it just as this Genius medical advancement. No. It's actually a risky medical procedure that begs Long term cost benefit analysis. I mean, if you don't believe me, look on the CDC website as to what is in the swine flu vaccine. You know, aluminum, insect repellent, formaldehyde, mercury. Yeah. You know, that's right on their website. Don't take it from a talk show host. I had all the vaccines. Did you? You were you were saying we're all about the same age in the yeah. In the fifties, anything went. So I had horrible allergies as a kid. Was it because I was vaccinated as an infant? I don't know. Maybe it was the mercury they drilled into my teeth. Did they drill that into your teeth, mercury? Yeah. Yeah. Okay. So I'm not a nut for Or Speaker 0: I became an actor. Right. I've heard you're talking about. Speaker 1: They drilled mercury into our teeth when we had cavities. They didn't do that to you. Speaker 0: I didn't know. Speaker 2: Okay. Well, Again, I don't have. I have 3 of them. I think they're silver. Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, they do some stupid things, and you're not a nut for asking about them. You know, a lot of people have said, Well, Bill, you know, there are people now dying of the swine flu who are in good health. By whose standards? His? Hospitals serve Jell O. They have fast food franchises in their lobby. The The report on Michael Jad the autopsy report came back and they said he was in good health. Okay. To me, he looked a little pale. So, you know, I don't I don't agree with what western medicine always says means good health. And, you know, Speaker 0: that's How come every time you go to a country where there's 3rd world or first world or whatever, you have to have the shots? You? Is every country wrong? Speaker 1: No. I don't know what's wrong. Speaker 0: All over the world, they got rules. You got to have those shots to go into those countries. Right. Speaker 1: Are they all wrong? What I know is that is that what Western medicine And likes to do is close off debate. Speaker 0: Yeah. But these are other countries all around the world, not just western medicine. Right. Speaker 1: I said, you know, sometimes, but that is that nation may May may be a smart thing to do. But, you know, most people go by the model of polio. You know, they think, well, we had polio, and we had the vaccine and it wiped out polio. Read up on the history. Speaker 0: So why are you doing all this? Why are you fighting this fight? Speaker 1: Just Just to say we need a debate about it. Just to say that the science is not settled. What I was attacked for saying we should look into this, and I don't believe in it. And lots of people feel the same way. This is not settled science like global warming. That's what they're trying to say is that it's as crazy as fighting global warming or evolution. Speaker 0: But just like Tom Cruise are you? Yes, not nearly No, it's not. But Bill But Bill Bill Bill Bill Bill Bill Bill Bill Bill Bill Bill Bill Bill Bill Bill Bill Bill Bill Bill Bill Bill Bill, you're like Tom Cruise saying I don't believe in therapy. Yeah. But Bill, you having us No, it's not. Bill, you having us on the show and rehashing all these problems you got yourself into on your last show is like going on a date. It's like going on a date and talking about your Right. What about you're talking about this? Speaker 1: Can I get maybe we can talk about some of your past problems? You? I just want to say I'm also not fucking my interns. All right. Speaker 2: Can I say one thing back on the vaccination of the flying flu? I mean, this is a very serious, very serious flu. Very serious. And there will be people, there are people that die every year from the so called seasonal flu. The difference in this, and we're talking about it. I remember Speaker 1: when we saw flu in 76. Remember Johnny Carson? Speaker 2: Yeah. And I'm not sure they found Speaker 1: the cure for which There is no known Let me Speaker 2: let me let me just wrap up. There are a lot of people working very hard within this administration, within every state in order to get these vaccines forward. Because if we don't, Bill, what the public health docs have told us, the vast, vast majority is that the risk of children dying and pregnant women dying from this is far greater than the vaccine. And that's why Speaker 1: But you're but you're presenting Speaker 2: as voluntary. Speaker 1: As is Speaker 2: it voluntary and not mandatory? Speaker 1: But they're wrong about a lot of stuff. There's a 100,000 people who die of fear of medical error. There's over a 100,000 who die from properly prescribed prescription drugs. 45,000, as we just said, died die from basically the profit motive. It's a sick society. Okay? And if you think I'm the crazy one for wanting to just look Look into his work. You're too inside the Speaker 0: world, which Speaker 1: is not me. Okay. Let's bring on Gary Shandling because we've gone too long on this.
RobSchneider
Posted - December 30, 2023 at 5:59 PM
Saved - December 30, 2023 at 8:15 PM

@RobSchneider - Rob Schneider

Thank you, @billmaher There is so much ignorance in @SethMacFarlane ‘s thinking I don’t know where to start. He seems to not want to recognize the overwhelming hateful vitriol was not coming from the unvaccinated (who were fired,demonized, called murderers) but from the VAXXED

@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd

🔥 Bill Maher & Seth MacFarlane Get Into a HEATED Debate Over the COVID Vaccine “Djokovic didn’t need it. Aaron Rodgers didn’t need it…You completely want to shut your eyes to the fact that there are repercussions to all medical interventions including a vaccine!” https://t.co/bafg4BmvBF

Video Transcript AI Summary
Doctors' fallibility and the lack of consideration for natural immunity are discussed. The conversation touches on mandatory vaccination, anecdotal evidence, and the risks and benefits of vaccines. The speakers debate the number of children who died from COVID and the importance of vaccines. They also mention the potential harm caused by vaccines and the need for individual choice. The conversation ends with a mention of the COVID vaccine's testing and the speaker's personal experience with it.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But then why are doctors wrong about so much? Speaker 1: Well, what do Speaker 0: you write about a lot too? And yes. And but very often, people who aren't doctors have been righter about things. Like, what would be an example of that? I would think, this country did not allow for, natural immunity to be considered. And I know this is a subject dear to your heart. Like, even if you had the disease, you still had to get a vaccine. That's powerful, stupid. They don't do that in Europe. Speaker 1: I think they do that here. There's mandatory vaccination in grades in Speaker 0: schools that have worse. But if you already had the disease, immunity. We didn't see we didn't we didn't seem to believe in that here. Speaker 1: That was debunked, though. I mean, that was that's that's debunked. Speaker 0: Don't you know people who've had COVID 4 Speaker 1: or 5 times? I do. That's not natural immunity. There's no immunity there. You've had COVID 5 times. Speaker 0: Probably because you had too many vaccines. I didn't have COVID. Speaker 1: The vaccine gave you COVID? Speaker 0: Well, that's certainly they're the unscientific about the fact that the vaccine, which does weaken you in order to strengthen you Says do all vaccines. Exactly. Yeah. But while you're in a weakened state, yes, that's why so many people like me got it, Did not have it while the thing was raging and I was taking zero precautions because I was never that afraid of it. Speaker 1: But that's anecdotal. Like, I've Speaker 0: had every booster that's anecdotal that Speaker 1: yeah. And I have never had COVID. I get a flu shot once a year. I haven't had the flu in 20 years. Speaker 0: Right. Well, I haven't eaten. I don't get Flushot. Speaker 1: K. So this is all anecdotal. But but Right. You know the difference between anecdotal and and statistical. I do. And, and statistically, you still have a 90% better chance of not being hospitalized, not dying if you're vaccinated. Speaker 0: Okay. Well, that but that's assuming all people are alike, and that is one of the giant fallacies in your way of thinking. We are not all alike. Yes. I would recommend and have recommended the COVID vaccine for the high risk people. Like, if you're 90 or fat, get it. Absolutely. You need it. Some people don't. But you had Djokovic didn't need it. But you had Aaron Rogers didn't need it. Speaker 1: But you had something like 1900 kids who died of COVID during the pandemic. Speaker 0: I don't think that's Right? The New York Speaker 1: How many how many of them died from the vaccine? None. Speaker 0: The the New York And Speaker 1: then and the the thinking there is that, well, probably most kids are not going to die from COVID, So why bother with the vaccine? Because it's only going to be a few 100 kids. Speaker 0: Right? I don't know how many kids died. That seems very high to me. I know, At one point, the New York Times grossly talking about misinformation, they had to apologize. They got it completely wrong. She reported something like 900,000 children have been hospitalized, and it was like 63,000. So maybe those facts Should be better. Speaker 1: Papers can get it wrong, and they print retractions in New Zealand. Speaker 0: But also the with COVID or from COVID, Did 1900 children die with COVID? Yes. It's a whole different story. Speaker 1: If it takes 7,000,000 people worldwide, 7,000,000 people worldwide who died from Like, if if even just a fraction of that is and and it's probably a larger fraction who died of COVID than who died with COVID. Even if even just a fraction of that is that's still a lot of fucking people. That's a lot of fucking people. Speaker 0: Yes. And But okay. But some but some people millions of people. But things are and you cannot prevent that. Speaker 1: You can, though. I mean, you you you can prevent Speaker 0: At what Cost. Is it yes. Speaker 1: Of getting a vaccine? What what's why is why what's the Speaker 0: The fact that you don't even have a clue, what's the cost getting a vaccine that you don't know the answer to that? No. You're you're you're you you completely want to shut your eyes to the fact that there are repercussions to All medical interventions, including a vaccine, all vaccines, they come they say side effects just like every medication does. You can see it in the literature. They can't write it on the vaccine, so you have to dig them. And of course, there is a vaccine court because so many people have been injured. This is not a screed to say don't do vaccines. I'm not against doing vaccines. I'm against doing vaccines that I don't think I need. I should be able to decide that For myself inside my body, but, yes, there are there are pathogens that would come along that I would fight you for? Speaker 1: Don't you think To get the vaccine. That's a good point. To Speaker 0: get the vaccine. Speaker 1: And and you bring me to my next point. Don't don't you think that the The vitriol and the the the just the the aggression towards the the the, That the anti vaccination movement, the way it souped itself up during all this, that the next time there is a pandemic, Our public health system is so weakened. Speaker 0: Yes. Exactly. Because of the because of them and their fucking misinformation that made people skeptical. The fact that everybody came out and said, if you get the vaccine, you you you cannot get the disease, and then, of course, that was wrong. And you and if you get the vaccine, you can transmit it. And that's what's going on inside. I understand. They're not Speaker 1: they're not you just said yourself, doctors are often wrong. Right. Especially when they're researching a Speaker 0: drug or a new disease. And I am not blaming them for it. I'm just saying that's why there shouldn't be the science. There's no the in science. That's what you want. You want just to be the the one true opinion. Speaker 1: That's not Speaker 0: true. Whatever it is. Speaker 1: No. The strength Speaker 0: of science. Want it. You don't know what's The Strength Speaker 1: of science is that it has the capacity to evolve and Speaker 0: improve. That some that vaccines affect have ill effects On some people? I I They do. Again, anecdotally. Speaker 1: But statistically, it's here, and it's here. It's like it's it's people how many 7,000,000 people died of COVID. How many people died from Vaccine. Speaker 0: Probably a few. But but I Speaker 1: don't know what the number is, but I know it's not a 1,000,000. Speaker 0: If we were more judicious about who needed it versus who it might hurt, which would not be the blanket policy of just everybody, one size fits all, then perhaps we could take down the Damages from the vaccine that happened But Speaker 1: then why vaccinate for anything? Speaker 0: And then take down the Speaker 1: Why vaccinate for for measles? Why not why why vaccinate for mumps or rubella, Vertusus, why why vaccinate for any of those things? Because somebody might get hurt by the vaccine. I mean, why why do those vaccines because COVID is newer? Speaker 0: Well, COVID is newer. Speaker 1: It is it yes. It's but is that the only reason? I mean, this this was by the time you got the vaccine I don't know if you had it. But by the time I got the vaccine, This was the most tested vaccine in the history of vaccination. Speaker 0: Yes. I had Speaker 1: it. Because I Speaker 0: had to get Speaker 1: it. Many people by that point had had it. It's like by the time it got into my arm, it's like, alright. Think I'm gonna be okay. Speaker 0: Okay. Well, I just so you know, I took one for the team. Okay? So so, you know, That should go into it. I did something I did not want to do. And we have to talk about this all
VigilantFox
Posted - April 9, 2024 at 1:58 AM
Saved - April 9, 2024 at 3:50 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Joe Rogan suggests that most doctors are silent on COVID vaccine injuries and deaths due to their reluctance to admit they were wrong and may have harmed people. He shares anecdotes of friends who developed pacemakers and experienced blackouts after receiving the vaccine. Rogan believes that the experimental nature of the medication may contribute to the increased number of deaths.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Joe Rogan Drops Theory Explaining Why Most Doctors Are Silent on COVID Vax Injuries and Deaths “It takes a very courageous person to say, ‘Not only was I wrong, but I probably f*cked people over. And a lot of people might have been adversely affected.’” “They told you to get it. They probably chastised people and scolded people [who] didn’t get it. So now, they have this opinion that they have started with and they stuck with, and they want to be correct.” Rogan also revealed some disturbing anecdotes: 1.) Two of his friends now have pacemakers following the rollout of the C19 injections. “One of them is in his thirties, [and] one of them is in his forties.” 2.) “People I know personally [who] got the shot blacked out—quite a few.” “There’s a lot of factors (going into why more people are dying), but one of those factors might be this experimental medication,” @JoeRogan said.

Video Transcript AI Summary
My friends, including doctors, who initially supported vaccines are now skeptical due to the COVID vaccine propaganda, adverse effects like strokes and heart attacks, athletes collapsing, and increased all-cause mortality post-vaccination. Some even got pacemakers. People are hesitant to admit they were wrong and may have harmed others.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: All of my friends that even our doctors Yeah. Who had no questions about the vaccines before at all, before COVID, they recommended all of them. Now a lot of them are changing their tune. Speaker 1: So they have more skepticism based on the information that came out about the COVID vaccine or vaccines in general? Speaker 0: First of all, just the propaganda campaign behind the COVID vaccine. Speaker 1: So once they saw this propaganda campaign Speaker 0: of any adverse effects, even though they personally knew people who had strokes, heart attacks, died Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 0: The died suddenly thing. The fact that athletes were dropping like flies. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 0: The athletes thing was nuts. That was Speaker 1: scary because these are the people that are on Speaker 0: the battlefield. Players having a heart attack, just dropping dead, all them vaccinated. Yeah. When you're seeing these people just drop dead Yeah. It reporters on TV just fainting, passing out. People I know personally Yeah. They got the shot that blacked out. Yeah. Quite a few. 1 of them 2 guys I know that have fucking pacemakers now. 1 of them is in his thirties. 1 of them is in his forties. That's a fucking pacemaker now. And you Speaker 1: should at least have that information before you make that decision. Speaker 0: Well, you should know that that information exists, and instead, they're trying to hide it, and they're trying to gaslight you about it. And then there's the thing about all cause mortality. The increase in all cause mortality is there's a jump in all cause mortality after administration of the vaccines. More people are dying. The percentage of all cause mortality is in certain groups up significantly. Mhmm. I think in England, they did a study that said it was up 20% across the board. In some groups, like, 18 to 49. In some some groups, it was up, like, as high as 40%. And that means that 40% more people are dying from cancer, heart attacks, strokes, everything After this event. Before. Everything. Everything, including people that probably would have died anyway. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: But 40% more in some groups Speaker 1: that are dying. Variables that exist as well. And this is a weird time. Speaker 0: Lack of medical attention during COVID. People didn't see their doctors. Maybe there was things that alcoholism. Of course. Yeah. People drank more. There's a lot of factors. Speaker 1: But one of those factors Speaker 0: might be this experimental medication. Jabbed into ourselves. Yeah. And the the resistance against that being possible is crazy. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: And it's because people first of all, they advocated for it. They told you to get it. They probably chastised people and scolded people who didn't get it. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: So now that now they have this opinion that they have started with and they're stuck with and they wanna be correct. They don't wanna back they don't wanna back off. It takes a very courageous person to say I'm Speaker 1: fucking wrong. Speaker 0: I was not only was I wrong, but I probably fucked people over, and a lot of people might have been adversely affected.
VigilantFox
Posted - April 11, 2024 at 3:06 AM
Saved - April 11, 2024 at 10:39 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Japanese Professor, Prof Masayasu Inoue, claims that the WHO used the pandemic as a false pretext to drive global vaccinations. He believes the use of experimental gene therapy on healthy individuals violated human rights and resulted in unprecedented drug-induced injuries. Source: @_aussie17.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Japanese Professor Delivers Stunning Message Everyone Needs to Hear “The pandemic was used as a false pretext by the WHO to drive vaccinations of all peoples in the world.” He says the fraudulent use of “experimental gene therapy to healthy people” was not only an “extreme violation of human rights,” but “the result was the induction of the terrible drug-induced injury that has never [been] seen in human history.” - Prof Masayasu Inoue, Professor Emeritus of Osaka City University Medical School. Source: @_aussie17

Video Transcript AI Summary
My specialty is molecular pathology and medicine. The pandemic led to rushed vaccinations worldwide, with Japan heavily vaccinated. The government denies vaccine injuries and plans to introduce a new self-replicating vaccine. Japan aims to develop vaccines in 100 days, risking human rights. International collaboration is needed to stop these dangerous plans. Censorship hinders spreading the truth about vaccines. Trust in Japan-made vaccines is cautioned against. Sharing information globally is crucial for unity and protection of human rights. Thank you for listening.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My specialty is molecular pathology and medicine. The pandemic was used as a first reflex by the WHO to drive vaccinations of all peoples in the world. A plan was set up to shorten the time to develop vaccines, which usually takes longer than 10 years to less than 1 year operation warp speed. This operation was used to cover up the misconception of the genetic vaccines under the pretext of saving time, an extremely dangerous method was selected. That is intramuscular injection of viral genes to produce toxic spice proteins directly in human tissues to stimulate immune system because this is a completely new method and misconcept method that has never applied before in human history. It is impossible, therefore, for most of doctors to give proper informed consent. However, due to irresponsible government and media campaigns to promote vaccines. 80% of the Japanese has been vaccinated, unfortunately. 7th shot have been done so far. This is the most and worst in the world, and the result was the induction of the terrible drug induced injury that has never seen in human history. I believe that the fraudulent use of experimental gene therapy to healthy peoples, particularly to healthy children, is an extreme violation of human rights. However, Keizo Takemi, Japanese minister of health, labor, and welfare, has been insisting that there is no serious concern about the injury caused by genetic vaccines. And without running from the current situation of injured patients, they plan to construct a new vaccine production system in preparation for the next pandemic. This is an unbelievable crazy situation. The Japanese government is the first in the world to approve a new type of vaccine called self replication the pro replicon vaccine and plans to start to supply it in this fall winter. The Ministry of Economy, Trail, and Industry is providing a huge amount of subsidies for this project and the factories to produce new work chains are being built one after another in Japan. I visit these factories directly. Furthermore, the Japanese government is currently soliciting large scale clinical trials worth $900,000,000 from pharmaceutical companies that are taking on the challenge of developing vaccines to prepare for the next pandemic by disease x proposed during the Davos conference this year. It is speculated that the movement by the Japanese government is part of CEPI, Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations 100 Days Mission, which aims to shorten the time to 1 third of operation warp speed. Namely, they are trying to shorten the vaccine business cycle by developing a vaccine in 100 days. This is possible only by ignoring the human right perspective. Amendments to the WHO, International Health Regulation, IHR, and the so called pandemic treaty, which are about to be adopted at the 77th World Health Assembly this year, attempting to give rationality and the legal binding force to such unscientific and dangerous, crazy plans. If such things continue, there is a high risk that Japan made vaccine will be exported under the guise for first trust. If Japan were to become a peer regulator, it would leave a repair of harm to future generations. Therefore, the actions of Japanese government must be stopped by international collaborations. Although, it has already been 3 years since I started to give lectures to educate Japanese people about the dangers of vaccines, it is still difficult to penetrate through the sound barriers of mainstream media. If we tell the truth about vaccines on YouTube, it is deleted within a day. The delay their, reality is that we are facing censorship and speech suppression almost every days. Therefore, I put my hope in the publication of a book, which is the last version of speech, and published that book with a title, withdrawn from WHO. It is difficult to stop this movement because it is now politically hopeless to change the situation of the Japanese government. The message I would like to cover convey to the world is that when disease x occurs in the future, you should never trust the Japan made vaccine that was developed in a short period of time In order to protect human rights in cases of control that transcend national boundaries, I believe that sharing the truth and countries is so important and that this is a step towards unity and solidarity. Only through the process of information exchange between all countries in the world, we can find hope in the midst of despair. I do hope that my statement will help all of you to protect your healthy life and your family. Thank you very much for your attention.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

READ MORE: A Message from Japan to the World Delivered by Prof Masayasu Inoue, Professor Emeritus of Osaka City University Medical School. https://www.aussie17.com/p/a-message-from-japan-to-the-world?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=email-half-post&r=1cu4xs

A Message from Japan to the World Delivered by Prof Masayasu Inoue, Professor Emeritus of Osaka City University Medical School. aussie17.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

More Stories on @VigilantNews: Do Not Take This Warning by Neil Oliver Lightly https://vigilantnews.com/post/do-not-take-this-warning-by-neil-oliver-lightly/

Do Not Take This Warning From Neil Oliver Lightly https://videopress.com/v/3QQOEZdf?resizeToParent=true&cover=true&preloadContent=metadata&useAverageColor=true “If the WHO says lockdown … then we will lock down.” Neil Oliver warns against the nightmare scenario being ushered in by the WHO Pandemic Treaty. If you think this is only about pandemics, guess again, the WHO will abuse its power to the fullest extent possible, including “climate emergencies.” “And so, in the… vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantNews Joe Rogan Drops Theory Explaining Why Most Doctors Are Silent on COVID Vax Injuries and Deaths https://vigilantnews.com/post/joe-rogan-drops-theory-explaining-why-most-doctors-are-silent-on-covid-vax-injuries-and-deaths/

Joe Rogan Drops Theory Explaining Why Most Doctors Are Silent on COVID Vax Injuries and Deaths Rogan also revealed some disturbing anecdotes. vigilantnews.com
newstart_2024
Posted - April 25, 2024 at 4:35 PM
Saved - April 26, 2024 at 10:27 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Many people who promoted the COVID vaccine have died suddenly, but this is often dismissed. It's important to be aware of past instances where drugs were pulled by the FDA and the opioid crisis. Trusting pharmaceutical companies blindly may not be wise.

@newstart_2024 - Camus

Joe Rogan says that tons of people "died suddenly" after "promoting" the COVID vaccine: "How many people were promoters of the vaccine and died suddenly. It's crazy how many f... young people just died in their sleep after they took it. And everybody's like: "Nothing to see here."...Just died suddenly. If you go to the died suddenly Instagram page, like holy s... , there's so many. So many people talking like talking about people who are anti-Darwin, anti-vaxxers and then you're dead. Sorry, you bought into the wrong bull..... But that's, you know if you really wanna get cruel, that's Darwinism. Do you not know they lie, by now? Are you not aware of the opioid crisis, are you not aware of Vioxx? Are you not aware ... 25% of all FDA approved drugs that get pulled? That's 1 out of 4 and you're like: "You're an anti-vaxxer, what are you a conspiracy theorist, you fool, Darwin's gonna do it's work with you..." You're modifying your genes you f... idiot, what are you doing? What are you doing? Are you just gonna trust Pfizer? Well they do support Anderson Cooper "brought to you by Pfizer"..."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Many young people who promoted the vaccine died suddenly, sparking concerns. The speaker mentions sudden adult death syndrome and criticizes those who trust pharmaceutical companies blindly. They warn against blindly trusting Pfizer and question the safety of FDA-approved drugs. The speaker implies that those who are anti-vaccine may face consequences due to Darwinism.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is how many people were promoters of the vaccine then died suddenly? It's crazy how many young people just died in their sleep after they took it. And everybody's like, nothing to see here. Sudden adult death syndrome. Yeah. Just died suddenly. You ever go to the died suddenly Instagram page? Like, holy shit. There's so many. And so many people, like, talking about people who are, you know, anti Darwin, anti vaxxers, and then then you're dead. Sorry. You you bought you bought into the wrong bull but that's you know, if you really wanna get cruel, that's Darwinism. Do you not know they lie by now? Do you not are you not aware of the opioid crisis? You're not aware of Vioxx? Not aware of the various, like, the 25% of all FDA approved drugs that get pulled? It's 1 out of 4. And you're like, really, you're an anti vaxxerty. Speaker 1: What do you what do you what do you, Speaker 0: a conspiracy theorist? You fool. Darwin's gonna do its work with you. You're modifying your genes, you idiot. Like, what are you doing? What are you doing? You just gonna trust Pfizer? Well, they do support Anderson Cooper brought to you by Pfizer.
stkirsch
Posted - July 12, 2024 at 4:02 PM
Saved - July 12, 2024 at 4:31 PM

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

Watch this. You just have to watch the last 40 seconds. They lied about the side effects to reduce vaccine hesitancy, and "they NEVER should have been mandated" per former CDC director.

@McCulloughFund - McCullough Foundation

JUST IN - Former CDC Director Robert Redfield admits that COVID-19 mRNA injections can induce a very strong pro-inflammatory response and that side effects were intentionally underreported. "They should have never been mandated ... They don't prevent infection, they do have side effects." @SenRonJohnson #MFPolicy

Video Transcript AI Summary
We were misled about mRNA vaccines staying in our arms, as they actually circulate in the body for months. Lipid nanoparticles in the vaccines distribute throughout the body, causing potential harm. The spike protein produced by the vaccines can be toxic, leading to inflammation. Transparency regarding vaccine side effects was lacking, and mandating vaccines was a mistake. Personal choice should have been prioritized over mandates.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We were told it was gonna stay in our arm. Right? Yeah. Okay. We were told this is mRNA. Gonna degrade rapidly in our body. Right? But it wasn't mRNA, was it? It was modified actually produced synthetically so it wouldn't degrade. And we now have studies that say that mRNA is circling the body at least, I think, 2 months, and we haven't done studies beyond that. Correct? I know in your own practice, you don't administer that because you realize the spike protein is toxic to the body. Speaker 1: I prefer the killed protein vaccines. Speaker 0: When when did you first determine or when did you first find out about the biodistribution studies Pfizer had done that the Japanese regulators released in February of 2021? Speaker 1: Probably. Yeah, probably somewhere in the spring or summer of 'twenty 1. It was clear that the mRNA in some patients was persisting much longer than it should. Speaker 0: When did you find out about the just the biodistribution, the lipid nano particles, or when did people in the FBI, FDA, when should they known about the fact that they were by distributing all over the body? Speaker 1: Yeah. I don't know the answer to that. I was telling you the summer of 2021 is when I be probably became more aware that this Speaker 0: Only because the Japanese regulators released that. But again, this was part of the Pfizer studies. So they knew that the lipid nanoparticle which is designed to permeate difficult to permeate barriers, correct? That's the design of the lipid nanoparticle. So they knew it was gonna be distributed all over the body, concentrating the ovaries, the adrenal glands. It crosses the blood brain barrier, correct? Speaker 1: Correct. Speaker 0: So what would let's just again, you're a doctor. What happens when you have a lipid nanoparticle by distributing, and let's say, this mRNA, this modified mRNA attaches to a heart muscle. What is it? It it it injects itself into the cells, causes that heart muscle cell to produce a spike protein, correct? Which is toxic to the body. And then what does the body do? Speaker 1: It has a very strong pro inflammatory response, which is problematic. Again, I think, senator, what you're getting at, which I'm a 100% agreeing with you, is I think there was not appropriate transparency from the beginning about the potential side effects of these vaccines. And I do think there was inappropriate, decisions by some to try to under report any side effects because they argue that would make the public less likely to get vaccinated. I do think one of the greatest mistakes that was made, of course, was mandating these vaccines. They should have never been mandated. It should have been open to personal choice. They don't prevent infection. They do have side effects.
SaiKate108
Posted - October 9, 2024 at 10:09 PM
Saved - October 10, 2024 at 12:30 PM

@SaiKate108 - Kat A 🌸

Joe Rogan stuns Michael Shellenberger with the truth about the polio vaccine. At least 95% of cases now are asymptomatic and the majority of cases are vaccine derived. Big profits for Big Pharma for a long time now. Everything must be questioned. https://t.co/MZhD5J8osm

Video Transcript AI Summary
95 to 99% of polio cases are asymptomatic. The majority of polio cases today are vaccine-derived. The speaker expresses distrust due to perceived lies during the pandemic, citing Fauci's statements to Rand Paul about gain-of-function research and the White House's warnings of severe illness and death for the unvaccinated. The speaker believes these actions were motivated by profit, leading to the creation of billionaires during the pandemic. They suggest a historical pattern in the U.S. of prioritizing profit over people's well-being, implying that individuals will exploit situations for financial gain if they can get away with it, especially with protection and the promise of large profits.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What percentage of polio do you think is asymptomatic? Oh, god. Great question. Oh, I I'm assuming high. Right? A lot? Take a guess. 50%? 99. Wow. 95 to 99 depending on who you ask. And the majority of polio cases today are vaccine derived polio. So there's a particular strain of vaccine that causes people to get polio. And there's a particular strain of polio rather that comes from that vaccine. So what's your where are you at? What's your bottom line on vaccines right now? Like where do you I am not a vaccine expert, but I am a person that has been lied to for 4 years and so blatantly and so obviously when you look at Fauci talking to Rand Paul and just lying openly about whether or not they funded gain of function research. Right. The fact that he got away with all that. The fact that the White House tells you for the unvaccinated, you're looking in a winter of severe illness and death, just scaring the shit out of people. And it seems to me they were doing that to maximize profits because they wanted to keep selling these things, and a lot of people got extremely rich. Many billionaires were created because of the the pandemic, because of the COVID vaccine. It's all very spooky to me because I think there's a long history in this country of people doing things for money knowing that people are gonna suffer because of it. Well, it's just sort of a human thing if you can get away with it. If it is illegal and you have the protection in place and you know that you're gonna profit largely from this, you do it.
VigilantFox
Posted - October 31, 2024 at 9:50 PM
Saved - November 1, 2024 at 3:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a post about J.D. Vance's appearance on the Joe Rogan podcast, where he discussed his personal experience with the COVID vaccine. He described it as the sickest he's been in 15 years, feeling bedbound for two days with a racing heart. Vance compared this to his multiple COVID infections, which he considered mild. He noted that many public figures fear admitting to vaccine side effects due to the stigma of being labeled anti-vaccine, mentioning a Senate colleague who has experienced serious side effects but remains silent.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried Today #10 - J.D. Vance Drops Vaccine Bombshell Personal Story J.D. Vance revealed on the Joe Rogan podcast that “the sickest [he’s] been in the last 15 years” is when he took the COVID vaccine. Vance felt so badly that he said his heart was “racing,” and he was left bedbound for two days straight. Despite having COVID “five times,” Vance said that COVID was at worst a “sinus infection” compared to being the “sickest [he’s] been” with the vaccine. Rogan jumped in, adding that he knows several liberal public figures who believe they’ve suffered vaccine injuries, but they don’t want to admit it publicly out of fear of being labeled “anti-vaccine.” “Yeah,” Vance agreed, sharing that he has encountered several individuals in the same situation, saying “I know people who are public figures who have had serious vaccine side effects who do not want anyone to talk about it. Absolutely. They’re scared of being labeled an anti-vaxxer.” One of those people injured, Vance revealed, is “a Senate colleague who doesn’t want to talk about it but worries that it’s permanently affected his sense of balance, dizziness, and vertigo.” “I’ve talked to a number of people who think that they got vaccine injured. Some of them are public about it, and some of them are not,” Vance said. (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)

Video Transcript AI Summary
The exemption for pharmaceutical companies from liability for vaccine injuries is alarming. Many people have experienced severe side effects, yet discussing these issues remains taboo. After receiving the vaccine, I felt sicker than ever, even after having COVID multiple times. Many friends report feeling ill after their second vaccine dose, but this side effect isn't openly acknowledged. The history of pharmaceutical companies lying and facing fines raises concerns about their accountability. Political donations from these companies influence discussions, and there's a reluctance to address vaccine injuries, especially among those on the left. Some individuals fear being labeled as anti-vaxxers, despite experiencing lasting effects like dizziness and balance issues. Many are hesitant to speak out, even if they believe they were vaccine-injured.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That whole thing they pulled off with exemption of pharmaceutical companies being responsible for injuries Speaker 1: For injuries from the vaccines. Was crazy. Speaker 0: It's crazy because you just believe it's still exist. People that have lied forever. Yeah. It does still exist. And it Speaker 1: still exists, and that is totally insane. And I I mean, you know, I so I I I took I took the vax and, you know, I haven't been boosted or anything. But the the moment where I really started to get red pill on the whole vax thing was the sickest that I have been in the last 15 years by far was when I took the vaccine. And I've had COVID at this point 5 times. I was in bed for 2 days. My heart was racing. I was like the the fact that we're not even allowed to talk about that even, you know, I no no, like, serious injury, but but even the fact that we're not even allowed to talk about the fact that I was as sick as I've ever been for 2 days and the worst COVID experience I had was, like, a sinus infection, I'm not really willing to trade that. And No. You don't even you know, everybody that I know or a lot of people I know, they talk about the second shot that they got of the vaccine was really that made them really, really sick. Well, that's a side effect and not a side effect that we even talk about enough in this country. Speaker 0: No. It's and it's also again, we're talking about companies that have a long history of lying and being forced to pay criminal fines, and then we're giving them this exemption from being responsible for any of the side effects. Yeah. Speaker 1: And who do you think this big pharma companies donate to politically in 2024? I'll give you a big fat guess. Speaker 0: Probably Kamala Harris. Speaker 1: By a significant margin. Speaker 0: Well, it's a weird one where you're not even allowed to question it. You're not allowed to discuss it. Speaker 1: Oh, sure. Speaker 0: And that becomes very religious just like all these other things that we talked about where you have this this thing that everybody speaks about in hushed tones. People know people that have been vaccine injured. Yeah. And particularly people on the left, they're very reluctant to discuss it even publicly. Yeah. I know people who are public people who have had serious vaccine side effects who do not want anyone to talk about. Absolutely. They're scared of being labeled an anti vaxxer. Speaker 1: I have a Cine colleague who doesn't wanna talk about it, but worries that it's, like, permanently affected his sort of sense of balance and dizziness and vertigo. And, yeah, it it happens. I've talked to a number of people who think that they got vaccine injured. Some of them are public about it, and some of them are not.
DefiantLs
Posted - December 25, 2024 at 12:30 AM
Saved - December 25, 2024 at 2:18 PM

@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s

Joe Rogan: COVID-19 conspiracy theorists were right about everything. https://t.co/zzGZmq1sZV

Video Transcript AI Summary
A recent 500-page report on the COVID-19 pandemic suggests that the virus likely originated from a lab incident in Wuhan, China. Over $200 billion in relief funds were lost to fraud due to weak oversight. Prolonged lockdowns and mandates caused significant economic damage, mental health issues, and learning loss, lacking strong scientific support. Policies disregarded natural immunity, leading to distrust in public health measures. The WHO and CDC faced political interference, resulting in inconsistent guidance that further eroded public trust. Key federal agencies and Cuomo's administration obstructed oversight and concealed important evidence. The subcommittee on the pandemic indicated that many conspiracy theories were accurate, yet there have been no repercussions or apologies from those who spread misinformation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The house released a 500 page report on COVID 19 pandemic. Key findings. COVID 19 likely originated from a lab related incident in Wuhan, China. Crazy. You get banned from YouTube for saying that. Banned. Okay. Over $200,000,000,000 in relief funds lost to fraud with criminals exploiting weak oversight. Prolonged lockdowns and arbitrary mandates caused severe harm. Economic devastation, mental health crises, and historic learning loss while lacking robust scientific support. Policies ignored natural immunity pushing mandates that eroded trust and harmed public perception of science. Absolutely. WHO and CDC compromised by political interference, offering inconsistent unscientific guidance that fueled public distrust, and the key players included federal agencies and Cuomo's administration actively obstructed oversight efforts and hid critical evidence. Christ. Select subcommittee on coronavirus pandemic basically said all the conspiracy theorists were correct. Every single one of them, no repercussions, no retractions, no apology from Rachel Maddow. None of it.
Holden_Culotta
Posted - January 22, 2025 at 6:39 PM
Saved - January 22, 2025 at 7:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Four months ago, I warned Joe Rogan that mRNA technology is Big Pharma's "ultimate cash cow," representing a trillion-dollar invention that couldn't normally be marketed due to its dangers. The aim was to normalize gene therapy for a population unaccustomed to the idea. If doctors had been allowed to do their jobs, they would have found inexpensive and safe treatments, including the link to vitamin D. The emergency allowed for the mRNA platform's rollout, but I believe we've hindered their plans for future applications.

@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta

4 months ago, Bret Weinstein warned Joe Rogan: mRNA tech is Big Pharma’s “ultimate cash cow.” “We’re talking about a trillion-dollar invention that could not be brought to market normally, because it’s way too dangerous.” “Their real goal was to normalize the use of a gene therapy on a population that had never had that idea placed in its mind.” “Had doctors been enabled to simply do what doctors are supposed to do, they would have discovered that there were treatments—inexpensive ones, one of them extremely safe, the other one comparatively safe—that were highly efficacious.” “They would have discovered the connection to vitamin D.” “The mRNA platform, which can be used to reformulate every vaccine they’ve got, to create a bunch of new vaccines. We’re talking about a $1 trillion invention that could not be brought to market normally, because it’s way too dangerous.” “The emergency made it possible not only to bring it to market, but to get nearly everybody on board with it.” “The mRNA platform itself is the ultimate cash cow that couldn’t be brought to market under anything but the most extraordinary emergency circumstances.” Joe Rogan: “Do you think that the blowback from all of this … makes it more difficult for them to roll out that platform for other things?” Weinstein: “Yes, I think we got in their way.” @joerogan @BretWeinstein

Video Transcript AI Summary
The emergency use authorization (EUA) was crucial for normalizing the mRNA platform, which was seen as a significant advancement in vaccine technology. The fear surrounding COVID-19 helped facilitate acceptance of this new approach, despite existing treatments that could have mitigated the pandemic's impact. If doctors had been allowed to explore effective treatments, the reliance on mRNA vaccines would have been diminished, creating a control group that could reveal potential harms. While the EUA was important, it wasn't strictly necessary; they could have navigated around it. The rollout of the mRNA platform aimed to reshape public perception, and the legal complexities surrounding the EUA provided a layer of immunity for those involved. The backlash and discussions about vaccine injuries may complicate future implementations of this technology.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We were at the emergency use authorization. Yeah. And you think that that wasn't necessary and they could have gotten it through anyway? Speaker 1: I think it's yes. It's logical enough. There's truth in it. They, you know, having a viable preventative for for SARS CoV 2 in theory should have prevented in the UA, but I don't think that that was an obstacle they couldn't have overcome. I think the problem was their real goal was to normalize the use of a gene therapy on a population that had never had that idea placed in its mind. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: And so they called it a vaccine. That was one thing. But they also needed the disease to be frightening enough that people would accept something radical in order to get through it. And had doctors been enabled to just simply do what doctors are supposed to do, they would have discovered that there were treatments, inexpensive ones, one of them extremely safe, the other one comparatively safe, that were highly efficacious. They would have discovered, the connection to vitamin d, all of these things. And that would have that would have meant 2 things. 1, it would have meant that the degree to which the mRNA platform got normalized would have been much reduced, and it also would have created a massive control group. People who didn't take the shots, which would make the harms that much less obvious. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: So I suspect the reason I say that a $100,000,000,000 isn't a lot of money when it obviously is a lot of money is that it's not a lot of money compared to what was at stake in their minds, which is the mRNA platform which can be used to reformulate every vaccine they've got, to create a bunch of new vaccines. This we're talking about a $1,000,000,000,000 invention that could not be brought to market normally because it's way too dangerous, and the emergency made it possible not only to bring it to market, but to get everybody or nearly everybody on board with it. And I don't know how deep this rabbit hole goes. I do think there is something remarkable about the early days of the so called pandemic where doctors were primed for the horror of this disease, so that they were already in the mindset of radical interventions, which meant that they did a lot of harm with things like ventilators that didn't need to be done. They killed a lot of people because they thought they were rescuing them. So the EUA story is good enough, it more or less explains it but I don't think it it obscures the bigger picture which is that the mRNA platform itself is the ultimate cash cow that couldn't be brought to market under anything but the most extraordinary emergency circumstances. And so they took a virus that shouldn't have existed in humans at all and wasn't that terrifying, when it was really released into the population, and they turned it into something frightening enough that people would contemplate things that they ordinarily would have rejected. Speaker 0: But doesn't that also make sense that the emergency use authorization would have to be in place in order for them to implement this? Because you're always gonna like you said, the the lack of a control. Right? Right? If everybody gets vaccinated, you don't know what the hell happened. You blame it on COVID. Yep. Which is why people who've been hit with the shots say they have long COVID. Mhmm. But if you have no emergency use authorization and then people are allowed to make their own decisions and doctors are allowed to make their own decision. There's a lot of it's way easier to do it with this emergency use authorization. It's way easier to slip it through. Oh. And the only way you could stop that is if all of a sudden if so emergency use authorization is supposed to only exist if there's not some sort of a medication that currently exists that treats it. Right? Otherwise, you're gonna have to go through all the trials. If there's another medication that exists so you demonize the medications, you sneak it through, you make everybody take it, therefore, you lose the control, and now you've got this platform rolled out. Do you think that they didn't know to the extent of the damage that it was gonna cause? Speaker 1: I think they knew. Speaker 0: You think they knew it was gonna harm that many people? Speaker 1: Yeah. Because so much I mean, I'm not arguing that the EUA wasn't important. I think it was important. I just don't think it was necessary for them to they they could have overcome that obstacle the way they overcame. I see Speaker 0: what you're saying. Speaker 1: Many others. Speaker 0: But the most important thing was rolling out this platform. And Speaker 1: normalizing it, getting people to accept the idea that they were gonna take an mRNA shot. Right? That was a big leap. And so the EUA was important, and we know that because of the shenanigans around. They ultimately did get a shot that they said was the same, non emergency use authorized, but I'm now forgetting the term when the FDA actually, is another term. It's not authorized, but it's a synonym. But anyway, they did go approved. They did get one approved, and you couldn't get it. They kept giving the one that had the EUA. They did that for legal reasons. Mhmm. It gave them a layer of immunity. Right? They had been given the license to deliver an experimental drug, and then they got approval for a nonexperimental drug, and they kept giving the experimental one even though they said they were the same thing. There's something very deep there around the legal status of that emergency use authorized pharmaceutical. Speaker 0: And so do you think that the blowback from all of this and the amount of people that are reporting vaccine in injuries and the amount of discussion that's happening, especially online about these things makes it more difficult for them to roll out that platform for other things. Speaker 1: Yes. I think we got in their way. I think we outed them.

@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd

NOW — Oracle CEO Larry Ellison says AI will be able to detect early stages of cancer and develop personalized mRNA vaccine therapies https://t.co/ZAX7skKWSq

Video Transcript AI Summary
We're developing an exciting cancer vaccine utilizing AI tools. Tumor fragments circulate in the blood, allowing for early cancer detection through a simple blood test. By applying AI to analyze these tests, we can identify the most threatening cancers. Once we gene sequence the tumor, we can create a personalized mRNA vaccine for the individual, which can be produced robotically in about 48 hours. This approach promises not only early detection but also tailored vaccines for each person's specific cancer, showcasing the potential of AI in revolutionizing cancer treatment.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of the most exciting things we're working on, you again, using the tools that's that that Sam and Masa are providing, is our is a cancer vaccine. It's very interesting. Early diet it turns out, I'll be quick, All of our cancers, cancer tumors, little fragments of those tumors float around in your blood. So you can do early cancer detection. If you can do it using a you can do early cancer detection with a blood test. And using AI to look at the blood test, you can find the the cancers that are actually seriously threatening the person. So we can again, cancer cancer diagnosis using AI has the promise of just being a simple blood test. Then beyond that, once we gene sequence once we gene sequence that cancer tumor, you can then vaccinate the person, design a vaccine for every individual person to vaccinate them against that cancer, and you can make that vaccine, the that mRNA vaccine. You can make that robotically again using AI in about 48 hours. So imagine early cancer detection, the development of a cancer vaccine for the for your particular cancer aimed at you and have have that vaccine available in 48 hours. This is the promise of AI and the promise of the future. Great. Thanks.
newstart_2024
Posted - February 18, 2025 at 9:29 PM
Saved - February 20, 2025 at 7:57 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared my experience with the vaccine, noting that it made me the sickest I've been in fifteen years, even worse than my five COVID infections. I find it concerning that we can't discuss these experiences openly, especially when many people I know felt ill after their second vaccine shot. Joe Rogan echoed my thoughts, highlighting the troubling history of pharmaceutical companies and their lack of accountability for side effects.

@newstart_2024 - Camus

JD Vance: "I took the vax, and, you know, I haven't been boosted or anything. But the the moment where I really started to get red pilled on the whole vaxx thing was the sickest that I have been in the last fifteen years by far was when I took the vaccine. And I, you know, I've had COVID at this point five times. I was in bed for two days. My heart was racing." "I was like the the the fact that we're not even allowed to talk about that, even, you know, I no no, like, serious injury. But but even the fact that we're not even allowed to talk about the fact that I was as sick as I've ever been for two days, and the worst COVID experience I had was like a sinus infection, I'm not really willing to trade that." "And everybody that I know or a lot of people I know, they talk about the second shot that they got of the vaccine was really that made them really, really sick. Well, that's a side effect and not a side effect that we even talk about enough in this country." Joe Rogan: "No. It's and it's also again, we're talking about companies that have a long history of lying and being forced to pay criminal fines, and then we're giving them this exemption from being responsible for any of the side effects."

Video Transcript AI Summary
I got vaccinated, but never boosted. The sickest I've been in 15 years was after the vaccine. I've had COVID five times, but the vaccine put me in bed for two days with a racing heart. It's concerning that we can't even discuss these reactions. My worst COVID experience was just a sinus infection, which is preferable to how the vaccine made me feel. Many people I know felt extremely ill after the second shot. These side effects aren't discussed enough. Plus, these are companies with a history of lying and criminal fines, yet they're exempt from responsibility for vaccine side effects.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I I mean, you know, I so I I I took I took the vax and, you Speaker 1: know, I haven't been boosted or anything. But the the moment where I really started to get red pilled on the whole vaxx thing was the sickest that I've been in the last fifteen years by far was when I took the the vaccine. And I've had COVID at this point five times. I was in bed for two days. My heart was racing. I was like the fact that we're not even allowed to talk about that even, you know, no, like, serious injury. But but even the fact that we're not even allowed to talk about the fact that I was as sick as I've ever been for two days, and the worst COVID experience I had was, like, a sinus infection, I'm not really willing to trade that. Speaker 0: And No. Speaker 1: You don't even you know, everybody that I know or a lot of people I know, they talk about the second shot that they got of the vaccine was really that made them really, really sick. Well, that's a side effect and not a side effect that we even talk about enough in this country. Speaker 2: No. It's and it's also again, we're talking about companies that have a long history of lying and being forced to pay criminal fines, and then we're giving them this exemption from being responsible for any of the side effects.

@newstart_2024 - Camus

Credit: @JDVance; @joerogan

elonmusk
Posted - February 19, 2025 at 10:30 AM
Saved - March 1, 2025 at 12:27 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I had a similar experience with Covid, having caught the original Wuhan strain before vaccines. The J&J vaccine only hurt my arm, but the mRNA booster hit me hard with massive chest pain, almost sending me to the hospital. Still, I believe synthetic mRNA has great potential for curing diseases.

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

I had a similar experience. Covid itself was nothing. I got the OG Wuhan strain before vaccines were out. J&J vaccine hurt my arm, but otherwise nothing. But the mRNA booster hit extremely hard. Massive chest pain. Felt like I got hit by a truck. Almost went to hospital. That said, synthetic mRNA has a lot of potential to cure cancer and other diseases. Research should continue.

@newstart_2024 - Camus

JD Vance: "I took the vax, and, you know, I haven't been boosted or anything. But the the moment where I really started to get red pilled on the whole vaxx thing was the sickest that I have been in the last fifteen years by far was when I took the vaccine. And I, you know, I've had COVID at this point five times. I was in bed for two days. My heart was racing." "I was like the the the fact that we're not even allowed to talk about that, even, you know, I no no, like, serious injury. But but even the fact that we're not even allowed to talk about the fact that I was as sick as I've ever been for two days, and the worst COVID experience I had was like a sinus infection, I'm not really willing to trade that." "And everybody that I know or a lot of people I know, they talk about the second shot that they got of the vaccine was really that made them really, really sick. Well, that's a side effect and not a side effect that we even talk about enough in this country." Joe Rogan: "No. It's and it's also again, we're talking about companies that have a long history of lying and being forced to pay criminal fines, and then we're giving them this exemption from being responsible for any of the side effects."

Video Transcript AI Summary
I got the initial vaccine but haven't been boosted. What really made me question things was how sick the vaccine made me. It was the sickest I'd been in fifteen years. I've had COVID five times, and the worst bout was just a sinus infection. I was in bed for two days after the shot and my heart was racing. It's strange that we can't even openly discuss how sick the vaccine made some people. Many people I know felt awful after their second shot, and that's a side effect we don't discuss enough. Plus, we're giving exemptions from responsibility to companies with a history of lying and criminal fines.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I I mean, you know, I so I I I took I took the vax and, you Speaker 1: know, I haven't been boosted or anything. But the the moment where I really started to get red pilled on the whole vaxx thing was the sickest that I've been in the last fifteen years by far was when I took the the vaccine. And I've had COVID at this point five times. I was in bed for two days. My heart was racing. I was like the fact that we're not even allowed to talk about that even, you know, no, like, serious injury. But but even the fact that we're not even allowed to talk about the fact that I was as sick as I've ever been for two days, and the worst COVID experience I had was, like, a sinus infection, I'm not really willing to trade that. Speaker 0: And No. Speaker 1: You don't even you know, everybody that I know or a lot of people I know, they talk about the second shot that they got of the vaccine was really that made them really, really sick. Well, that's a side effect and not a side effect that we even talk about enough in this country. Speaker 2: No. It's and it's also again, we're talking about companies that have a long history of lying and being forced to pay criminal fines, and then we're giving them this exemption from being responsible for any of the side effects.
Humanspective
Posted - March 27, 2025 at 12:49 AM
Saved - March 27, 2025 at 4:31 PM

@Humanspective - Humanspective

Joe Rogan goes dead silent. The damage inflicted by Ventilators was incentivised by the government Elon Musk points out the $39K "moral quandary" to put someone on a ventilator. We now know that up to 80% of the people put on ventilators died https://t.co/4e9D70lyZJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The stimulus bill intended to help hospitals overrun with COVID patients created an incentive to record something as COVID. Hospitals are in a bind because if a hospital is half full, it's hard to make ends meet. Checking a box can yield $8,000, and putting a patient on a ventilator for five minutes can bring $39,000. The alternative could be firing doctors. This situation presents a tough moral quandary.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, right now, the so, you know, the road is hell the road to hell is paid with good intentions. I mean, it's mostly paid with bad intentions, but there's, you know, some good intentions, paving stones in there too. And the the the stimulus bill that was intended to help with the hospitals that were being overrun with with with COVID patients created an incentive to record something as as COVID that is difficult to say no to, especially if your hospital is going bankrupt for lack of other patients. So the hospitals are in a in a bind right now. There there's a bunch of hospitals that are they're following doctors as you were mentioning. They're, you know, they're if your hospital's half full, you're it's hard hard to make ends meet. So now you've got like, you know, if I just check this box, I get $8,000. Put them on a ventilator for five minutes, I get $39,000. Like or or or I gotta fire some doctors. So what's the what's this is this is a tough moral quandary. It's like, what what you can do? That's the situation we have. No.
thehealthb0t
Posted - April 26, 2025 at 1:31 AM
Saved - April 26, 2025 at 8:14 AM

@thehealthb0t - healthbot

Joe Rogan DESTROYS Fauci After Blaming Unvaxed for 300K Deaths Tony Fauci recently said the unvaccinated were “responsible” for an additional 200,000 to 300,000 deaths” in America. Well, Joe Rogan now has some words for Mr. Fauci. https://t.co/6OhtIu6A77

Video Transcript AI Summary
They claim podcasters are responsible for 200,000 to 300,000 deaths. Peter Hotez's analysis indicates that vaccine refusal, for various reasons, likely caused an additional 200,000 to 300,000 deaths in the country. The speaker refutes blame, asserting "you made it" and "you funded it," implying involvement in the research.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, that was the other thing. They blame podcasters. Right. They blame podcasters and said that we're responsible for two hundred to three hundred thousand deaths. Yeah. And you know, some have done studies. Peter Hotez has done an analysis of this and shows that in people who refuse to get vaccinated for any of a variety of reasons, probably responsible for an additional two to three hundred thousand deaths in this country. Hey, man. You made it. Yeah. First of all, don't blame us. First of all, you made it. Yeah. You fucking made it. You funded it. Yeah. You were a part of the research.
VigilantFox
Posted - April 30, 2025 at 6:35 PM
Saved - May 1, 2025 at 5:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared my thoughts on Joe Rogan's recent comments about the misinformation surrounding COVID. He criticized those who claim they were misled, pointing out that many of these individuals were the same ones spreading falsehoods. He highlighted the irony of the media's role in this narrative, suggesting that if podcasters had promoted the vaccines and people were harmed, they would have faced severe backlash. Additionally, I noted related discussions, including a guest on Rogan's show challenging the vaccine narrative and a Yale study that raises concerns about the COVID vaccine.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

NEW: Joe Rogan torches people saying we were “misled” about COVID— when the ones saying it are the exact same people who knowingly lied to the public. @JillianMichaels: “The New York Times is like, it looks like this came from a lab. It’s like, really?” @joerogan: “Well, the best part about it was that we were misled. Yeah, you were misled by you, you f*ckers. You did it. You did it!” Rogan added that if podcasters had pushed these experimental shots and people got injured, the media would’ve called for them to be banned and shut down immediately.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Five years ago, when an episode discussing COVID-19 origins came out, people reacted negatively. The speaker believed the episode was correct, and now the COVID-19 website is up, possibly due to Bobby Kennedy's influence. The New York Times reported the virus may have originated in a lab, but the speaker feels they were misled by the media itself. There have been no apologies or corrections from mainstream media, who are now presenting this information as if it's new. The speaker contrasts this with a hypothetical scenario: if podcasters had encouraged experimental shots and people experienced complications, mainstream news would have blamed the podcasters for side effects, unnecessary deaths, strokes, and other issues, potentially calling for their platforms to be shut down.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Five years? Ain't that crazy that was five years ago? It was like yesterday. I'll never forget it. Five years ago. And I remember when that episode came out, people were freaking out. Like, what are you doing? What is Brett doing? This is bullshit. You're you're gonna get us all killed. It made perfect sense to me. Well, he was right, clearly. And yet still, no apologies, no corrections, except the government website. The COVID nineteen website is now up, and this has to be because of Bobby Kennedy. I I hey. I mean, the New York Times was like, oh, looks looks like this came from a lab. It's like, you really? Well, the best part about it was that, like, we were misled. Yeah. You were misled by you, you fuckers. I know. You did it. Isn't that? You did it. It's disgusting, and there are zero apologies. No. Zero course corrections, and they unveil this information as though they are the purveyors of truth. Mhmm. Guys, we got a headline. You're a little late. From a love that you You're a half a decade late. That's right. You know what's really interesting? We've been talk talking about this a lot lately that imagine if the roles were reversed and if podcasters were the ones yelling at everybody to go out and take these experimental shots, and then they were experiencing all these complications and all these side effects. Mainstream news would be chastising us. Like, how dare you give people the advice to go out and do that? You're responsible for these people having all these side effects and all these unnecessary deaths and all these people that would have had no problem with COVID. You encourage them to take this vaccine, and they had strokes, and they had this, and they had that. They'd be calling for us to get shut down.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Related Stories: Joe Rogan Guest Completely Shatters the Vaccine Narrative https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/joe-rogan-guest-completely-shatters?utm_source=publication-search

Joe Rogan Guest Completely Shatters the Vaccine Narrative Everything you’ve been told is a lie—especially when it comes to polio. Dr. Suzanne Humphries reveals what really made all those polio cases disappear after the vaccine was introduced. vigilantfox.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Yale Study Quietly Confirms COVID Vaccine Nightmare https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/yale-study-quietly-confirms-covid

Yale Study Quietly Confirms COVID Vaccine Nightmare This is no longer a “conspiracy theory.” And the damage is only beginning. vigilantfox.com
VigilantFox
Posted - May 22, 2025 at 7:58 PM
Saved - May 23, 2025 at 12:26 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently watched a conversation between Joe Rogan and Aaron Rodgers that challenged the mainstream narrative on vaccines. They discussed alarming statistics regarding vaccine-related deaths, with Rogan citing a study suggesting up to 600,000 deaths linked to the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. They criticized the current vaccine schedule for children, questioning the necessity and safety of administering multiple doses. Both expressed concern over financial conflicts of interest in the medical community and the lack of transparency regarding vaccine studies. Their discussion highlighted the need for critical examination of the prevailing narrative.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

This was an autopsy. The conversation Big Pharma hoped would never hear——just happened. Two of the most outspoken Vaxx skeptics in one room. Joe Rogan and Aaron Rodgers didn’t only question the narrative. They dismantled it. But it was one statistic that Rogan dropped about vaccine deaths that made everyone question just how deep this goes. 🧵 THREAD

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

📍 Remember to bookmark this thread because you will not see this discussion covered on the MSM. Let’s break it down and roll the clips.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

When Joe Rogan sat down with Aaron Rodgers, the conversation quickly turned to one of the most polarizing topics in modern medicine: vaccines. But instead of retreading old ground, they zeroed in on one of the most overlooked—and deeply disturbing—double standards of the pandemic. Rogan opened the door with a brutally simple observation. “You’re not even supposed to eat sushi while you’re breastfeeding,” he said. “Because you could get some sort of a parasite. And yet, you’re going to take pregnant women and dose them up with this experimental vaccine.” He didn’t stop there. “There was no studies on whether or not women were getting damaged by this.” Rodgers chimed in to confirm what many already suspected: “No studies got released.” That silence, wasn’t due to a lack of data—but a refusal to release it. And now, as Rogan pointed out, the consequences are finally starting to come into view. “Now there's some study that it’s destroying their eggs.” Rodgers added, “That, the cancers, turbo cancers, people dropping, kids dropping.” Rogan let it sit for a beat before saying what many are thinking: “Yeah, it’s all very dark, dude.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
It is claimed that pregnant women are not supposed to eat sushi due to the risk of parasites, yet they are being given an experimental "vaccine" that is actually gene editing medication. It is asserted that there were no studies on whether women were being damaged by the vaccine when it was released. There is now allegedly a study showing that the vaccine is destroying women's eggs. There are also claims of turbo cancers and kids dropping.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I mean, it's like, what? You can't you're not even supposed to eat sushi while you're breastfeeding. You know? Yep. You're not even supposed to eat sushi while you're pregnant because you could get some sort of a parasite, and yet you're gonna take pregnant women and dose them up with this experimental vaccine, air quote vaccine, experimental medication is gene editing. Speaker 1: Yeah. You know, they changed the Speaker 0: They changed the definition. Yeah. But there was no studies on whether or not women were getting damaged Speaker 1: by got released. Speaker 0: Right. Yeah. And now there's some study that it's destroying their eggs. Yep. Yeah. Have you seen that? Speaker 1: Mhmm. Speaker 0: See if can find that. I bet you can't. Speaker 1: That, the cancers. Speaker 0: Yeah. See if you can find the eggs thing. Speaker 1: Turbo cancers. Speaker 0: I know I saved the egg thing. I can definitely find that. Speaker 1: Dropping, kids dropping. Speaker 0: Yeah. It's all very dark, dude. It really is.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

They quickly shifted to the broader vaccine schedule for children—and what they see as a runaway system with no brakes and no accountability. Today, American kids receive 72 doses of 17 vaccines between birth and age 18. Just to enroll in kindergarten, they’re hit with 29 doses of 9 different vaccines. Daycare kids face multiple rounds of 13. And few parents even realize this. Rogan questioned the logic behind that kind of medical regimen, especially when it comes to the very first days of life. “Why would you give a baby a Hep B shot on DAY ONE for a sexually transmitted disease? Totally unnecessary and crazy.” He also took aim at the fear-driven messaging around diseases like tetanus. “Tetanus is not dangerous. If you have an open wound with tetanus, you just wash it out and you won’t get tetanus. The number of cases? ZERO.” Rodgers, echoing a frustration felt by many parents, said the entire system has moved far from informed consent—and deep into financial conflicts of interest. Doctors aren’t just recommending vaccines, he argued—they’re being paid to. Behind it all, they pointed to a turning point in 1986, when the federal government passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. That legislation gave vaccine manufacturers blanket immunity from lawsuits, effectively removing the last guardrail. Since then, chronic illness among children has skyrocketed. Coincidence? They don’t think so.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Vaccines may work for some in preventing diseases like measles, but they can also cause problems. Informed consent is important, so people should know all the possibilities, without influence from incentivized doctors. Some doctors may receive kickbacks for administering the full vaccine schedule. The number of vaccines is high; for example, 72 doses of 17 vaccines between birth and age 18. Many states mandate children receive 29 doses of nine vaccines to attend kindergarten, and multiple doses of 13 vaccines for daycare enrollment. The Hepatitis B vaccine, given on day one, is questioned, especially since it's for a sexually transmitted disease. The COVID vaccine is also considered unnecessary. Tetanus was misrepresented as dangerous. It is claimed that tetanus is not dangerous, and can be prevented by washing out an open wound.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For some people, vaccines probably prevented them from getting measles. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. This it seems like they work. It's not like they don't work at all, but also they cause problems. We should be able to look at all these things. Yeah. And that's where you have informed consent. Informed consent is you know what the possibilities are. Not that they've been lying to you and gaslighting you so that the doctor gets more incentives. Speaker 1: Maybe they have. Speaker 0: Right. But it means saying but but this is the thing. Like, you should have your decision should be based entirely on that, not the influence of a doctor who's incentivized. Speaker 1: And you should know, mister and missus, are about to have a child, just so you know, this doctor gets a kickback should you get the full 72, 70 five vaccine schedules. Speaker 0: I don't think it's really 72. I think it's like is it 72 actual injections, or is it a bunch of different things mixed together like the MMR? They count that as three. You know? It's like one of those things. Okay. Well, whatever the number is. Let's just say it's 25. Well, how about the one Let's say it's one. How about the ones that are indefensible, like hep c or hep b? Yeah. What are you doing? Why would you even do that if it has side effects and you're giving it to a baby for a fucking sex disease? Speaker 1: On day one, right, for hep b is day one, I Speaker 0: believe? Crazy. Yeah. Totally unnecessary and crazy. Speaker 1: COVID vaccine? Speaker 0: Crazy. Totally unnecessary and crazy. Speaker 1: Seventy two doses. Speaker 0: Seventy two doses of 17 vaccines between birth and age 18. Holy shit. Most states mandate children get 29 doses of nine vaccines to attend kindergarten, and children enrolled in day care in many states are required to get multiple doses of 13 vaccines. Speaker 1: Suzanne was talking about tetanus. The tetanus one is wild. Speaker 0: It's wild because tetanus is not dangerous. Like, I always thought tetanus is gonna kill you. No. If you have a open wound with tetanus, you just wash it out, and you won't get get tetanus. Yep. What? Like, and then the number of cases of people that got tetanus, like, zero. Yep. It's like but they tricked us. When I was a kid, was like, don't get tetanus. Get that tetanus shot. I was worried to get a rusty nail. A rusty nail is gonna give me a tetanus. Yep. Fucking idiots.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Before we roll the next clip: if you’re not following me, you’re missing out on critical updates. Hit the bell 🔔 to stay sharp and informed. → @VigilantFox Now, back to the story you came for. https://t.co/aKULdXrEQE

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

But it was what came next that was truly disturbing. This was a bombshell and there is no denying it anymore. Rogan brought up a recent study he had just sent to his producer, Jamie. The analysis drew from adjusted VAERS data, MIT research, and findings from the Florida Department of Health—and the numbers were staggering. “I just sent Jamie this study. VAERS adjusted data, and other derived from the MIT, Florida Department of Health study findings that yield a conservative range of 470,000 to 600,000 American deaths from the Covid-19 mRNA shots.” Rodgers, almost in disbelief, responded, “That’s it?” Rogan nodded. “Well, just that alone. That’s a lot of people, man.” And then he dropped a jaw-dropping comparison: “More than World War I, World War II and Vietnam combined.” He clarified that the estimate referred to Pfizer alone—not even counting Moderna. “Pfizer alone likely killed over 470,000 Americans.” “They found a 36% increase in all cause mortality among Pfizer recipients versus Moderna.” Rodgers, deadpan and sarcastic, delivered the line that said it all: “Yeah, but they saved MILLIONS!”

Video Transcript AI Summary
A study using VAERS adjusted data and other data derived from MIT and the Florida Department of Health found a conservative range of 470,000 to 676,000 American deaths from the COVID-19 mRNA shots. The speaker states that Pfizer alone likely killed over 470,000 Americans, which is more than World War I, World War II, and Vietnam combined, if true. The study found a 36% increase in all-cause mortality among Pfizer recipients versus Moderna.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sent Jamie this, study, VAERS adjusted, data, and other derived from the MIT Florida Department of Health study findings that yield a conservative range of four hundred and seventy thousand to six hundred seventy six hundred thousand American deaths from the COVID nineteen mRNA shots. That's it? More than well, just that alone. That's a lot of people, man. More than World War one, World War two, and Vietnam combined, if that's true. It indicates Pfizer this is Pfizer alone. So this is not even Moderna. Pfizer alone likely killed over four hundred and seventy thousand Americans. They found a thirty six percent increase in all cause mortality among Pfizer recipients versus more Moderna. Yeah. But they saved millions. Yeah. I keep hearing that.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

They wrapped the conversation taking aim at the narrative itself—the one that turned vaccine skeptics into public enemies. Not because they were wrong. Because they were inconvenient. Rogan called it out. “You start talking to them about the possibilities that these things caused all these problems, and their eyes glaze over.” “They’re like, Oh! Where are you hearing this?” His response flipped the script: “Where are you hearing that it’s not the case?” “And why are you so confident to say that this is what happened?” Then he questioned the sacred cow of COVID rhetoric: “‘The Covid vaccine saved millions of lives.’ How do you know that?” But when it comes to the damage? “How many do you think got fucked up by it? I know a lot of people that got fucked up by it—and most people do too. They just don’t want to admit it.” Rodgers hit back at the fear machine: “Why were they trying so hard to scare the shit out of everybody? Tell me that.” “Why did they have fucking death tolls on the news stations?” Then he followed the money. “There’s a ton of money.” “Doctors get huge bonuses for fully vaccinated kids. That’s the truth.” And finally, he hit the core issue: “Instead of attacking the person that says that, isn’t it something you should look into?” “Is that a conflict of interest? Should be.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
People glaze over when the possibility that "these things" caused problems is raised. Some confidently state the COVID vaccine saved millions of lives, but it's unclear how they know this. Many people know others who were negatively affected by the vaccine but don't want to admit it, claiming correlation isn't causation. The news scared people with death tolls, and there's a lot of money involved, including huge bonuses for fully vaccinated kids. Instead of attacking those who say this, it should be investigated as a potential conflict of interest.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And that's what you see. Like, people are like you start talking to them about the possibility that these things caused all these problems, and their eyes glaze over. They're like, oh, where are you hearing this? Well, where are you hearing that that's not the case? Why are you so confident to say that this is what happened? People just, like, blank COVID vaccine saved millions of lives. Millions. Like, how do you know that? How do you know that? How many do you think got fucked up by it? I know a lot of people that got fucked up by it. Speaker 1: So do I. Speaker 0: And most people do too, and they don't wanna admit it. Well, it's not correlation. Causation is not correlate. They wanna pretend. Speaker 1: Why was why are they transferred to scare the shit out of everybody? Tell me that. Why they have fucking death tolls on the on the news the news stations? Speaker 0: They make a lot of money. Speaker 1: And that's with vaccine, same thing. There's a ton of money. Speaker 0: Ton of money. Speaker 1: Get huge bonuses for fully vaccinated kids. That's the truth. Isn't that I mean, like Yeah. Instead of attacking the person that says that, isn't it something you should look into? Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: Is that a conflict of interest? It seems like it is. Should be. Yeah. It seems like it is.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Thanks for reading. Follow me for more stories that matter. —> @VigilantFox Looking for something else to read? Trump Exposes White Farmer Killings on Live TV with South African President at His Side https://t.co/3U0Mmo6mVd

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Trump just played his ace card. The media spent years covering up the targeted killings of White farmers in South Africa——because it didn't fit their narrative. He confronted the issue head-on beside President Ramaphosa, under the bright lights of live TV. What happened next left the press scrambling for cover. 🧵 THREAD

VigilantFox
Posted - July 15, 2025 at 8:11 PM
Saved - July 16, 2025 at 3:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently watched an intense interview with Gavin Newsom on The Shawn Ryan Show, where he faced tough questions about his COVID policies and gun control stance. Shawn Ryan challenged Newsom on his vaccine mandates, prompting a moment of vulnerability when Newsom struggled to defend his decisions. Joe Rogan's text question about accountability for vaccine mandates added pressure, leaving Newsom floundering. The discussion also touched on Robert F. Kennedy Jr., where Newsom's attempts to deflect criticism felt shaky. Overall, it was a revealing exchange that showcased the challenges Newsom faced in defending his record.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Joe Rogan just AMBUSHED Gavin Newsom with a single text that forced him to answer for California’s draconian COVID policies. This conversation was a real test. Newsom tried to recycle old COVID talking points. But Shawn Ryan pushed back hard, telling Newsom to his face that he REGRETTED taking the vaccine. Then Rogan’s question landed like a bomb: Who will be held accountable for mandating “unnecessary and ineffective” COVID vaccines for young children? Watch Newsom squirm as he tries to defend lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and the damage those policies caused. 🧵 THREAD

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Governor Gavin Newsom didn’t get the friendly interview he might have expected when he joined The Shawn Ryan Show. Instead, he found himself pressed on the very issues that have defined...and haunted...his political career. Even before Covid came up, the conversation turned to one of the country’s most divisive topics: guns. Ryan opened the exchange with a direct question: “Do you think that everyday citizens carrying a gun reduces crime or increases crime?” Newsom didn’t hesitate, delivering the argument he’s repeated for years. “I think the evidence, the evidence suggests the opposite. It increases the likelihood of a gun death,” he said, insisting that states with stricter gun laws see fewer gun deaths. “And you look at all the states with the most comprehensive gun safety reforms, they have lower gun death rates than states with weaker gun laws. And there's a correlation there.” “California is one of the lowest gun death rates in America. The highest murder rates in the county tend to be red states.” Ryan wasn’t convinced. He brought up Chicago—a city with strict gun laws but among the nation’s leaders in shootings and homicides. “Well, I thought Chicago was the number one?” Newsom faltered. “No.....well.....as cities you'll have different experiences, but at state levels, gun safety from our perspective, saves lives,” he tried. He insisted the data proved his point. “We have the data to bear that out.” But there’s a reason that argument often feels hollow. California’s overall gun death rate might look better than the national average on paper, but its largest cities have become with violent crime rates that defy easy talking points. For anyone paying attention to the crime waves in Los Angeles, Oakland, and San Francisco, it was hard not to see the disconnect.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes that everyday citizens carrying guns increases the likelihood of gun deaths. States with comprehensive gun safety reforms have lower gun death rates, and there is a correlation between gun safety and saving lives. California has one of the lowest gun death rates in America, while the highest murder rates tend to be in red states; eight of the top ten murder rates per capita are in red states. California started establishing common sense gun safety laws in the nineties, leading to a significant, nation-leading reduction in the gun death rate since then. The speaker states they are focused on data and evidence, and also mindful and respectful of the Second Amendment.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you think that everyday citizens carrying a gun reduces crime or increases crime? I think the evidence the evidence suggests the opposite. It increases the likelihood of a gun death. And you look at all the states with the most comprehensive gun safety reforms, they have lower gun death rates than states with weaker gun laws. And there's a correlation there. California is one of the lowest gun death rates in America. The highest murder rates in the country tend to be red states significantly. So you look at the murder rate, eight of the top 10 murder rates cap per capita in the country are all red states. Well, thought Chicago was the number one. No. It was. Cities, you'll have different experiences. But at state levels, gun safety, from our perspective, saves lives. And we have the data to bear that out. You look at the common sense gun safety laws that California started establishing in the nineties. You look at our gun death rate from the nineties till today, significant reduction, nation leading reduction in the gun death rate. So that's that's the prison to which I I'm into the data. I'm into the evidence. I'm also deeply mindful and respectful of the second amendment and people's constitutional rights.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

But things really unraveled when the topic turned to Covid. Newsom fell back on the lines he’d used for years, praising the vaccine rollout and claiming it kept hospitals from being overrun. “I think it prevented the acuity of the symptoms and disease, and kept people out of the emergency rooms,” he said. “And I think that's universally accepted by 90% of objective, of....uh....experts.” But Ryan wasn’t some media anchor nodding along. He fired back with his own experience—blunt and undeniable. “Man, I don't know—I wound up getting the vaccine. It's one of the only f*cking things I regret,” he said. “And then I got f*cking Covid like a couple weeks later.” The exchange was devastating for Newsom. He had no comeback, just the same stale claim that "experts agree." The governor looked and sounded exactly like the politician who forced mandates on millions while ignoring anyone who pushed back....even when their own experience told them the promises didn’t hold up. It was the moment Newsom’s polished veneer cracked. Watching him try to explain why people should trust the same messaging that had failed so many times was downright painful.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks if the vaccine prevented people from getting COVID. Speaker 1 believes it lessened symptom severity and reduced emergency room visits, a view supposedly held by 90% of objective experts. Speaker 0 regrets getting vaccinated, fearing he would miss his son's birth. He got COVID a couple of weeks after vaccination and received conflicting test results, questioning the competence of the testers.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now do you you really think that the vaccine prevented people from getting COVID? Speaker 1: I think it prevented the acuity of the symptoms and disease and kept people out of the emergency rooms. And I think that's universally accepted, at least by 90% of objective experts. Speaker 0: Man, I don't know. I just you know, I wound up getting the vaccine. It's one of the only fucking things I regret. I did it. Which one was it? Did you Speaker 1: go old school Johnson and Johnson? Pfizer. So you did the MNRA, yeah, you did the novel, a different version. Speaker 0: And I was scared to death I was going to miss the birth of my son. So I took it and then I got fucking COVID like a couple of weeks later and they couldn't test. Got the test and it was this one's positive, this one's negative. And I'm like, you guys have any idea what the hell you're doing?

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Before we roll the next clip: if you’re not following me, you’re missing out on critical updates. Hit the bell 🔔 to stay sharp and informed. → @VigilantFox Now, back to the story you came for.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Then came the biggest blow of all...and it didn’t even come from Shawn Ryan. Joe Rogan sent in a question by text, and Ryan read it out in full, leaving Newsom nowhere to run. It was a reckoning for the Covid mafia and Newsom himself. “Who will be held accountable for mandating COVID-19 vaccines for children, which were unnecessary and ineffective, and who will take responsibility for the unprecedented increases in myocarditis and cancer cases among them?” Rogan added another direct shot: “Second to that, do you feel any remorse for that draconian decision that was obviously heavily influenced by the pharmaceutical companies’ desire for maximum profit?” Newsom visibly struggled. He didn’t deny the mandates or defend the decision directly. Instead, he started pointing fingers at Trump and Republican governors who also rolled out vaccines...without addressing his own responsibility at all. It was humiliating. For once, there was no crowd of supportive journalists to clean it up for him, no carefully crafted press release to smooth it over. Just an unfiltered moment of accountability, and he had nothing to say other than trying to defend failed policies and Covid talking points.

Video Transcript AI Summary
California's governor was asked who will be held accountable for COVID-19 vaccine mandates for children, which were allegedly unnecessary and ineffective, and who will take responsibility for increased myocarditis and cancer cases among them. The governor was also asked if he felt remorse for decisions influenced by pharmaceutical companies' desire for profit. The governor denied the claim, citing progressive laws against big pharma. He stated California, like other states, worked with the Trump administration on COVID-19 mitigation strategies. He has tasked his team with an objective review of California's COVID-19 response, including interviews with those who opposed mandates and stay-at-home orders, and comparisons to other states. While maintaining that vaccines save lives, the governor acknowledged concerns about children and vaccines. He used advisors from other states to review federal recommendations. The report, due next month, will be an objective review of what went right and wrong during the pandemic. He stated that no one knew what they were up against at the time, including the former president, whom he worked closely with.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So this is from Joe Rogan. Oh, god. This is a tough one. Speaker 1: He won't have me on the show, by the way. Who will Speaker 0: be held accountable for mandating COVID nineteen vaccines for children which were unnecessary and ineffective, and who will take responsibility for the unprecedented increases in myocarditis and cancer cases among them? Second to that, do you feel any remorse for that draconian decision that was obviously heavily influenced by the pharmaceutical companies' desire for maximum profit. Speaker 1: Yeah. I've been I've I've I've signed some of the most progressive laws against big pharma in the country. So I have receipts on that. So no one should suggest that it was about doing the bidding of big pharma, quite the contrary. California, like many states, red states included, Florida included, moved forward early in the pandemic working with the Trump administration and the advisers from the Trump administration to impose certain strategies to mitigate the impacts of this novel disease, coronavirus. What's interesting about this process is none of us have really reviewed in an objective way. It's all through the lens of politics what we did right and what we did wrong. And so I'll answer that question by telling you what I've just tasked. I've asked our team to put together an objective review of everything we did right, everything we did wrong. We're interviewing people that vehemently disagree with us, that oppose the mask mandates, that oppose the stay at home orders, people that are international experts. We're stress testing our entire process. Coulda, shoulda, would've. Comparing and contrasting to what other states did. I mean, Florida shut down their bars and restaurants before California. Before California. The question was when did we start to unwind some of those restrictions? California was more restrictive, and we were certainly aggressive at scale. As it relates to vaccines, vaccines save lives. But Joe asked a very different question about children, and I respect that. And that was where there was a lot of feedback, with a lot of experts that I had as advisers. By the way, I used advisers from two other states. We did this West Coast alliance to review not just what was coming from the federal government, but to have a prism and lens on the recommendations coming from the CDC through our own independent advisers, and I took their advice, not as a doctor, but as a governor. So with humility, seriously, humility and grace, I've asked them to have that report done. It's gonna be done next month. And it'll be the only state that I know of that is putting out a truly objective review of what went right and what went wrong. And I know everyone's a goddamn genius now in hindsight. But at the time, none of us knew what we were up against, including the president of The United States, who I worked very closely with. There wasn't a democratic governor in America that worked closer during the pandemic than I did with Donald Trump.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The embarrassment didn't ease when the conversation switched to talking about Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his vaccine stance during Covid. Newsom tried to paint himself as the adult in the room. “And so I respect Bobby, but he really turned on me early and he flat out lied about some things,” he said. Ryan immediately pressed him: “What did he lie about?” Newsom didn’t have a clean answer: “He lied about.....said, oh because Newsom got some, I got sick for two or three days and he said because of a vaccine and then he lied about what I had....” “He weaponized it. He misled.” It sounded shaky, and Ryan let the awkwardness hang there. He was stuttering and squirming slightly. Then, almost unbelievably, Newsom tried to claim credit for RFK Jr.’s entire MAHA platform. It was absurd. “And I'm by the way, Make America Healthy, that's California,” he said. “I've been leading that cause for decades.” “There's no governor......again....I'm...forgive me....that movement started in California.” “I did the Skittles ban a couple years ago.” It was the kind of moment that would be funny if it weren’t so revealing.....a politician trying to claim a candy ban as proof he’d pioneered the entire idea of one of the greatest movements in political history.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker respects Bobby but says he "turned on" him early and "flat out lied" about things. Specifically, Bobby allegedly lied about the speaker getting sick for two or three days, claiming it was due to a vaccine. The speaker says Bobby "weaponized" and "misled" about what he had. The speaker claims to have been leading the "make America healthy" cause for decades, stating it started in California. He cites the Skittles ban and past efforts to remove red dye. While admiring Bobby, the speaker believes there is a lot of "mis and disinformation" regarding vaccines that has hurt public health.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And so I I respect Bobby. But he he I mean, he really turned on me early, and he flat out lied about some things. What did he lie about? He lied about it. He said, though, because Newsom got some I I I got sick for two or three days, and he said it was because of a vaccine. And then he lied about what I had. He weaponized it. He misled. I was like and I was reaching out going, brother, the hell's going on? And I saw him go down this sort of darker, you know, could people can disagree. And I'm, by the way, make America healthy, that's California. I've been leading that cause for decades. There's no governor again. I'm forgive me. That movement started in California. I did the Skittles band a couple years ago. My buddy Marshawn Lynch was all pissed at me because we're going after red dye earlier than and all the folks at Fox were mocking me. Now they're all jumping over patting themselves on the back leading this effort. But so I've I've always admired that about Bobby. But on the vaccines, I think some skepticism, absolutely. But I think that there's a lot of mis and disinformation that has really hurt public health. It's my humble opinion.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Watch the full episode of the Shawn Ryan Show with @ShawnRyan762 here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BBq3Q_fHSU

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@ShawnRyan762 Special thanks @overton_news for helping me put this thread together! If you’re into truth-seeking news accounts like mine, they’re definitely worth a follow! —> @overton_news

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@ShawnRyan762 @overton_news I was banned 3 times from Twitter 1.0 for defying mainstream narratives. If censorship strikes again, you’ll always find my latest threads at http://VigilantFox.com. I sift through the news so you can live your life. Stay Informed Here: https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/how-to-stay-informed-with-vigilant.

The Vigilant Fox | Substack Writer, video clipper, and pro-freedom citizen journalist with 12 years of healthcare experience. Tyranny is not possible without compliance. Click to read The Vigilant Fox, a Substack publication with hundreds of thousands of subscribers. vigilantfox.com
How to Stay Informed with The Vigilant Fox WELCOME NEW READERS! vigilantfox.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@ShawnRyan762 @overton_news Thanks for reading. For more in-depth stories the mainstream won’t touch, follow me on 𝕏. —> @VigilantFox Looking for something else to read? Victor Davis Hanson just obliterated former CIA Director John Brennan, exposing three lies and hoaxes. https://t.co/w5cUOU7j43

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

It was a TOTAL indictment. Victor Davis Hanson just obliterated former CIA Director John Brennan, as fresh investigations into his actions take a dark turn. Hanson laid out THREE DAMNING examples of lies and hoaxes that expose the real Brennan. And he finished with a gut-punch: “He should be worried. Not about losing his security clearance. But about the very real possibility of being indicted and sent to jail.” 🧵 THREAD

wideawake_media
Posted - September 19, 2025 at 10:03 AM
Saved - September 19, 2025 at 12:14 PM

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Jordan Peterson: Billions of people were given an experimental injection that wasn't a vaccine. https://t.co/PBZg1KreGA

Video Transcript AI Summary
- The m n r m r n a technology was a radical qualitative leap forward in technology. - The mRNA is a type of vaccine. - The reason it was called a scene was because was a brand name that had a track record of safety, and shoehorning it in that was one of the ways to make sure that people weren't terrified of the technology. - It bears very little resemblance to anything that went before that. - There are different types that they didn't have to contend with the fact that it wasn't the same technology. There are different technologies. - There certainly are. That are different technologies.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He injected billions of people with an experimental it wasn't a bloody Just no. It wasn't. It was. No one isn't. Yes. It is. It's not Well, isn't it a 100% success rate? You think it's a definition of all point of is to give your body a protein train on. The immune system works. Technology. Who cares if it's not the there's plenty there's different so types that they didn't have to contend with the fact that it wasn't the same technology. There are different types of There certainly are. That are different technologies. Fine. The mRNA is a type of vaccine. To be Now this is No. It was like this and now it's like this. No. No. No. It was like this and now it's like this. The m n r m r n a technology was a radical qualitative leap forward in technology. You can call it if if you want to, but it bears very little resemblance to anything that went before that. The reason it was called a scene was because was a brand name that had a track record of safety, and shoehorning it in that was one of the ways to make sure that people weren't terrified of the technology.
redpillb0t
Posted - January 25, 2026 at 4:55 AM
Saved - January 25, 2026 at 5:19 AM

@redpillb0t - redpillbot

Jordan Peterson: Billions of people were given an experimental injection which was not really a vaccine. https://t.co/ogajUD7YV5

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that billions of people were injected with an experimental vaccine, stating “it wasn't a bloody just no. It wasn't.” He rejects the notion of it being definitive or perfect, emphasizing that “it wasn’t” in terms of being a flawless solution. Speaker 1 counters, asserting “It was no one isn’t,” suggesting confusion or contradiction in the prior claim and challenging the certainty of the statement. He adds that there is a lack of a 100% success rate and questions the ultimate aim, asking what the core purpose is when it comes to giving your body a training of the immune system and technology. Speaker 0 reinforces the complexity, noting that there were “different types” to contend with and that the fact that they weren’t the same technology matters. He agrees there are various types of vaccines or approaches, indicating there is diversity in the technology or formulations used. Speaker 1 concedes the existence of different types and technologies, acknowledging that “there are different types of” vaccines, and that “There are different technologies.” He identifies mRNA as a type of vaccine but Speaker 0 interrupts, insisting “No. It was” and continuing his line of reasoning about the distinctions between the technologies and their evolution. Speaker 1 acknowledges change, saying “like this, and now it's like this,” recognizing a progression or shift in the approach. Speaker 0 rejects the suggestion that the transition is simple or uniform, insisting “No. No. No. It was like this, and now it's like this.” He asserts that the mRNA technology represented a radical, qualitative leap forward in technology, a claim about the significance of the development. Speaker 0 contends that naming the technology as mRNA can be acceptable only in a limited sense; he says “You can call it if if you want to, but it bears very little resemblance to anything that went before that.” The rationale for the term mRNA is tied to branding: “The reason it was called a scene was because was a brand name that had a track record of safety, and shoehorning it in that was one of the ways to make sure that people weren't terrified of the technology.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He injected billions of people with an experimental it wasn't a bloody just no. It wasn't. Speaker 1: It was no one isn't. Speaker 0: Yes. It is. It's Well, it doesn't have a 100% Speaker 1: success rate. You think it's a definition of all point of is to give your body a Speaker 0: protein train on. The immune system works. Technology. Speaker 1: Who cares if it's not the same? There's plenty there's Speaker 0: different so types that they didn't have to contend with the fact that it wasn't the same technology. Speaker 1: There are different types of Speaker 0: There certainly are. Speaker 1: That are different technologies. Fine. The mRNA is a type of vaccine. Speaker 0: Now this is No. It was Speaker 1: like this, and now it's like this. Speaker 0: No. No. No. It was like this, and now it's like this. The m n r mRNA technology was a radical, qualitative leap forward in technology. You can call it if if you want to, but it bears very little resemblance to anything that went before that. The reason it was called a scene was because was a brand name that had a track record of safety, and shoehorning it in that was one of the ways to make sure that people weren't terrified of the technology.
View Full Interactive Feed