TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed
@stevenvoiceover - @stevenvoiceover
BREAKING : Previously Unseen January 6th Footage https://t.co/0jxqANbNVn
Video Transcript AI Summary
Welcome to the US Capitol Building! Join us for the insurrection and check out our promotional leaflet. Stay in the safety quadrant and ask our capital police officers for help if needed. Enjoy activities like the photography tour, fancy dress competition, and climbing wall (remember the safety ropes). Jacob Chansley is the winner of the fancy dress competition and will receive a guided tour. Please clean up after yourselves, visit the souvenir shop, and join us on the outdoor terrace for Nancy Loses Insurrection Soiree with refreshments and music by our competition winner.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the US Capitol Building. If you've joined us today for the insurrection, please make sure you pick up a promotional leaflet on the way in. Stay inside the safety quadrant at all times. And if you get lost, speak to one of our capital police officers, they'll be sure to to point you in the right direction. And be sure to set aside a little time today to join us for some insurrection activities including our photography tour, our fancy dress competition, and have a go on our climbing wall.
But don't forget those safety ropes. And I've now received the results of our fancy dress competition. The winner today is Jacob Chansley. That's mister Jacob Chansley. If you could report to your nearest Capitol Police Officer, they'll be sure to give you your prize, a guided tour of the building.
Wherever possible, please try to clean up after yourselves. Don't forget to visit the souvenir shop on the way out, and feel free to join us on the outdoor terrace for Nancy Loses Insurrection Soiree, grab yourself a light refreshment, and enjoy the music of our very own fancy dress competition winner.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
Here’s Some January 6th Footage The Jan 6 Committee & Media Would NEVER EVER Show You. Censored video showing WEAPONS being handed out from INSIDE the Capitol.. It was a Deep State FEDsurrection. #J6
@TruthSeeker____ - JoshWho
If you don't watch this, then you don't want to know the truth what happened that day.
@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸
There’s an insurrection happening now on Capitol Hill https://t.co/hBMIcv3pqW
@VincentCrypt46 - Vincent Kennedy
!Warning! Video of violent insurrectionists on January 6th 2021 https://t.co/hzAHk6AYZi
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses gratitude to the officers and blesses them. They appreciate the mousetraping and describe it as glorious, comparing the smell to that of an old church. They conclude by thanking the officers again.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, officers. God bless you, guys. Thank you for your patience.
We really appreciate it. We got mousetraping. That is glorious in person, isn't it? That is glorious. It smells like an old church.
Thank you, guys.
@texan_maga - 🇺🇲Salty Texan
@DschlopesIsBack Feds broke into the Capitol https://t.co/SVKVc3f49A
Video Transcript AI Summary
Open the line, guys. Be careful, don't go in there.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why don't you guys open up the line? You sure guys take that? I'm just picking up Do not go in there.
@WatchChad - Chad Prather
GRAPHIC: Previously unreleased footage of the J6 “insurrection” shows protesters violently strolling past capital guards. This is horrifying. https://t.co/Y5EGC74t3J
@GuntherEagleman - Gunther Eagleman™
This was not an insurrection… 👇🏼 https://t.co/GxV5z3N6yP
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses frustration and anger towards the lack of action taken to protect the capital building. They question why backup has not been called and criticize those in charge for allowing the destruction to occur. The speaker urges for immediate assistance and suggests that if backup is not provided, it indicates a lack of concern.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you letting this happen? Why haven't you called for backup? Where is your backup? This is our damn capital building, and you all are letting it get destroyed on your watch. Fuck all of you.
Call for backup. Get some help down here. And and if they don't wanna give you fucking backup, they obviously don't give a shit about
@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth
If this doesn’t change your perception of J6, I don’t know what will https://rumble.com/v3wr4oa-january-6-capitol-police-fired-into-a-peaceful-crowd-and-incited-violence.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 warns about chemical munitions and instructs the deployment. Speaker 1 welcomes someone to the front line and urges them to get more munitions. Speaker 2 reacts in shock. Speaker 1 continues to give commands to shoot. Speaker 0 mentions flashbangs being deployed on them. Speaker 1 expresses frustration about the actions of their own side. Speaker 2 calls for assistance due to a large crowd. Speaker 3 acknowledges acts of violence witnessed during the event. Speaker 1 blames the use of concussion grenades and pepper spray for the escalation. Speaker 0 mentions tear gas being used on them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have given warnings about chemical munitions. I need the left and left of key position above me to start deploying. Launch. Launch. Launch.
Speaker 1: Hey. Welcome to the front of the fucking line. Come here.
Speaker 2: Holy fucking shit.
Speaker 1: Listen. Keep keep it. You gotta turn around. We need more fucking munitions. Let's go.
Fucking shoot it. Go. Shoot. Shoot. Hey.
I'm up here. I'm trying
Speaker 0: Yep. They're deploying flashbangs on us.
Speaker 1: They're shooting into their own people. We're supposed to be supporting Protect blue lines, and this is what they do to us. Sigma deployed. Sigma deployed. Street.
Speaker 2: 89123 up here. You're 43 on the north side of High Street. Very large crowd coming down high street. If you want, I need you here, please.
Speaker 1: Yes, sir. That's a yes. That's it. Keep going.
Speaker 3: As one who is here and, Who has custody of these 44000 hours of videos, I can attest there were acts of violence. There were acts of terrible violence that day. Even from what I had seen with my own eyes and and through the media, I've seen Acts of violence against police officers that I had not seen before. And it was brutal, and it was ugly. And, our officers online did what they needed to do at the time.
Speaker 1: If they'd never Drone the concussion grenades. If they'd never used
Speaker 4: a pepper spray, this wouldn't have happened. It was a
Speaker 1: peaceful protest. I was standing within 15 feet of the line of officers. They started firing at us before anybody did anything to them. We were not rushing them. There was no advance on them.
They just started throwing concussion grenades and pepper spray.
Speaker 0: They've been tear gassing us.
January 6 - Capitol Police Fired into a Peaceful Crowd and Incited Violence
Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper
rumble.com
@JackPosobiec - Jack Poso 🇺🇸
Here is Alex Jones on Jan 6 on a bullhorn urging people away from the US Capitol https://t.co/oSgPWPKYik
@JudicialWatch - Judicial Watch ⚖️
.@TomFitton: The January 6th videos have been released! The Left didn’t want you to see the videos because it contradicts their narrative. https://t.co/iyjNfanZTW
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker mentions that videos of the events on January 6th are easily accessible on the internet. They encourage viewers to find these videos themselves, as they believe they may contain information that contradicts the prevailing narrative about that day. The speaker suggests that the situation was more complex than commonly portrayed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They're widely available on the internet. I I don't have the website, we've probably put it below, but you can figure it out and you can now start looking at the January 6th videos yourself. And, this is something that a lot of students want you to see, so I'm sure there's going to be some interesting information in there that, contradicts their narrative on January 6th and gives a full picture of what happened that day, which is much more complicated than what they would have you believe.
@JackPosobiec - Jack Poso 🇺🇸
Here is Alex Jones on Jan 6 on a bullhorn urging people away from the US Capitol Twitter 1.0 suppressed these videos https://t.co/oSgPWPKqsM
@JohnCremeansUSA - John Cremeans USA
@RepJeffries The True Insurrection: January 20th, 2017 footage from Washington DC on the day of Trump's inauguration. This happened all around the country. Democrat sponsored domestic terrorists were unleashed on America protesting Trumps election! @realDonaldTrump #Democrats #Insurrection https://t.co/0cd35DdcSO
Video Transcript AI Summary
Police had to push back protesters to allow firefighters to reach the small fires that had been set throughout the day. One protester threw a flashbang grenade at the police, which exploded in an officer's face. Tear gas was used, and six officers were reportedly injured. The situation escalated to the point where someone threatened to destroy a limousine and urged someone named Gabe to leave. Additionally, there was mention of putting the cops in a "piggy wolf."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You are Police had to push back the protesters so firefighters could get to the flames. Small fires had appeared all day. This upped the temperature, which, of course, was the point. 1 demonstrator threw a flash a wolf. Banged grenade back at police.
It exploded in an officer's face. Plenty of tear gas, 6 officers reportedly injured. They will destroy your limo. You need to leave now. Hey, Gabe.
47. Put the cops in piggy wolf? Right.
@TuckerCarlson - Tucker Carlson
We don’t need to guess about what happened on January 6th. It was one of the most videotaped events in human history. A new documentary proves that most of what you’ve heard about that day is a lie. https://t.co/924EyuNrKf
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the lack of knowledge surrounding the events of January 6th, claiming that the media and political class have focused on it while suppressing alternative narratives. They argue that despite the extensive footage available, there has been no comprehensive timeline of the day. The speaker suggests that January 6th is being used by both the Democratic and Republican parties to achieve their own goals, such as suppressing the population and preventing Donald Trump from running for president again. They highlight a documentary called "January 6th: A True Timeline" that presents a different perspective on the events, including law enforcement being overwhelmed and claims of being set up. The speaker concludes that the public should watch the documentary and draw their own conclusions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: An awful lot has happened to American society into the world over the past 3 years but for our media and political class most of it goes on mentioned because they're talking about something else they're talking about January 6th the most solemn day in American history moment worse than Pearl Harbor worse nine eleven worse than the American Civil War. That's what they're telling us. It's hard to respond to this because even now 3 years later most Americans have no real sense of what happened on January 6th and any attempts to tell them have been suppressed by the big tech companies or shouted down by NBC News and CNN and other news organizations. That's odd if you think about it. Why do most of us have no real idea what happened?
There's probably no event in American history that was filmed by more people from more angles than January 6th. And yet until very recently no one had put together a timeline. What happened? People walked of them from the White House to the Capitol, some of them went inside the building and we've been talking about the aftermath. But how did all of that happen?
It's on tape. Why haven't we seen it? Well, if you've watched Joe Biden recently, you know why you haven't seen it. Because January 6th is a perfect way for the Democratic Party and by the way the Republican Party for the party that controls this country, the Uniparty, to get what it wants, to suppress the population, to keep Donald Trump from running for president again, and to put its enemies in jail. Just the other day, Joe Biden often derided as senile.
Didn't seem senile at all as he gave a speech about January 6th. He seemed like a fascist. Watch this. Watch Joe Biden celebrate the fact that his political opponents were sent to prison and listen as the crowd applauds him bragging about how these Trump voters are rotting in prison. Why?
Speaker 1: Since that day, more than 1200 people have been charged for their assault on the Capitol. Nearly 900 of them have been convicted or plead guilty. Collectively to date, they have been sentenced to more than 840 years in prison. What's Trump done? Instead of calling him criminals, he's called these these insurrectionists Patriots.
Speaker 0: He's a vicious and cruel and hollow man and really gets the for any of that but it was on display in that speech is on display all around us and the only reason they get away with it is because again most of us have no real idea what actually happened on January 6th, but it is knowable because it was filmed from thousands of angles and that tape still exists to some extent it's still being suppressed by the Republican Speaker of the House by the way who could release it but hasn't memo to the Speaker go ahead and release that video but there's still enough in the public domain that a group filmmakers decided to put it all together. Now there's very little editorial commentary in their new documentary it's called January 6th a true timeline and it should be the most famous film in the United States but it's not we're hoping that changes soon the movie lays out the day's events moment by moment it shows you what actually happened at the Capitol from video that they did not shoot but collected once again from the public domain in some cases is from liberal journalists who are on the scene.
And they discovered a lot. For example at 224 while crowds outside the capital were still going growing the president then president president Trump tweeted this the USA demands the truth that's a very famous tweet the January 6th special commission, the fake committee of liars who, quote, investigated January 6th, made reference to that tweet repeatedly. They claimed it was the reason that protesters breached the capital. But that's a lie, like so much of what they said. Video from that day collected in this documentary tells a very different story.
At the moment that Trump tweeted that, Metro police law enforcement on the scene appeared to have accidentally tear gas themselves and run away from the scene that's what the video shows and that left a path to the capital wide open but assess for yourself here's the video
Speaker 2: Our investigation found that immediately after the president's 2:24 PM tweet, the crowds both outside the capital And inside the capital surged.
Speaker 3: What the January 6th committee failed to mention was that it was officers misusing and CS gas at that same time that led to a surge.
Speaker 4: Hey, Rich. Put it up the step.
Speaker 3: DC MPD officer, Cowry, at the urging of officer Thao, misfires a CS gas canister that eventually forces police to fall back and lose their position. As officers on the West Plaza, unequipped with gas masks, Struggle breathing. The plume of CS gas can be seen from the overhead camera on the lower right corner of your screen. It blows over the entire area of the West Plaza that the police had secured for nearly an hour. Within 3 minutes of the officer CS gas misfire, the police line on the West Plaza entirely collapses.
Speaker 0: So we now know that there were more than 200 plainclothes federal informants in the crowd. Some of them were already inside the capital before it was breached before law enforcement opened the doors for the protesters in some cases they were already inside so you can draw your own conclusions from that. But we also know that a lot of law enforcement on the ground, those were local DC cops, Metropolitan PD you'd saw on that tape, and some of the Capitol Police had nothing to do with any kind of setup. In fact, they were the victims of it. As you could see in that clip, law enforcement on the scene were completely overwhelmed and the body Kim, video shot throughout the day shows that.
You see cops repeatedly telling each other that leadership has failed them and that's true. And that they've been quote, set up. Watch this.
Speaker 3: At 2:33 PM, a frustrated police officer can be heard venting about being, In his words, set up.
Speaker 4: They set up up. That's what they did. They set up they set up 64. Absolutely. And then they asked No.
For 2 hours later, they set us up. They needed everybody by the way. No. By the way, they set us for pizza. No.
We ain't got it. We're doing we put away here with some
Speaker 3: At the same time, police officers discuss being unprepared for what they encountered.
Speaker 4: I didn't know we are coming up for this. I wanna make sure we all had our I didn't realize how bad I they set us up to fail. Hey, Dave. There was no way we were winning that. And you've now you got at least 4 platoons that are just gassed out?
Yeah. Literally. Because us, 54 doesn't have masks. Yeah. Well, remember, we're supposed to be rapid response just to buy time for the party to use to come.
They didn't come. They didn't ask for.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Those aren't racist insurrections. Those are cops and they know exactly what happened. They got set up and so did a lot of people that day. It wasn't like federal authorities didn't know there was gonna be a big demonstration.
They knew very well. They've been talking about it for weeks. It's not a guess it's proven it's a fact so they knew what was up they've been set up now one of the protesters you may recognize from that day is a man called Jacob Chansley often called the media the QAnon Shaman he's the guy with a painted face and horns now the media repeatedly told us that he and Ashlee Babbit the military veteran who was murdered that day the unarmed woman who was shot to death by Michael Byrd that he was a threat to public safety and completely out of control. But, of course, the tape shows just the opposite as does this documentary. When Metro PD made their way to the senate floor and asked Chansley to leave, Chansley complied immediately.
He thanked officers and said, quote, god bless you as he left. Watch this.
Speaker 4: Let's go. Let's go. Thank you. Thank you, officer.
Speaker 0: Thank you for your patience. We really appreciate it. Thank you for your patience. We love you. God bless you.
That's what they said to the cops. Right these are the racist insurrection. Jacob Chansley did a hard time in prison but there he is telling cops he loves them as he walks peacefully unarmed out of the Senate chamber. So you may have concluded correctly that virtually everything you have heard he screamed at you for 3 years about January 6th is a lie and this tape proves it it's an hour long it is well worth your time we hope every American watches it and draws the obvious conclusion which is that our leadership class is poisonous power mad and dangerous they're the dangerous ones not the people who showed up at the Capitol to protest the theft of their democratic election the people who set it up in the 1st place joining us now is David Summerall. He's one of the producers of this documentary and we're very glad to have him join us.
David thanks so much for coming on. So you've been involved in, in trying to figure out what happened that day for the last 3 years and you did this amazing public service for the rest of us by putting together this documentary. Tell us some of the things that you learned from this.
Speaker 5: Well, I think it's the things we didn't learn from anybody else. The select committee had every opportunity with all the evidence put a, you know, documentary out that showed what happened that day. And it and it's been interesting working with families, with the lawyers, you know, all the defendants that we can find that we can try to help and, go through this footage to find that their stories are all true that they tell. You know, If you notice, nobody's been charged by the FBI for lying about what they witnessed on January 6th, which I think is a big point. But the the discovery in this video I think the public really needs to see and that's why they've kept it hidden and dangled it like a carrot over the public for so long for 3 years when it tells a different story and the hostages you know they deserve to be released there there's no reason to keep people that were peaceful You know, guys like Chansley, like you said, you know, god bless you.
And then they put him in prison. So I don't understand, you know, why the public Didn't understand more about it other than they couldn't see it. And I hope they are properly outraged from this film.
@leslibless - 🇺🇸ProudArmyBrat
Here are the leftists being extremely violent right after President Trump was inaugurated. They wanted an all-out bloodbath! https://t.co/5zro6z1skk
Video Transcript AI Summary
Protesters in black, armed with hammers and bricks, clashed with police officers in riot gear using flashbang grenades and pepper spray near the inauguration route. Chaos ensued as officers sprayed pepper spray, affecting the audio technician. The scene was just outside the security perimeter. The speaker has anti-establishment views but does not condone the violence.
Translation (if needed): Protesters clashed with police near the inauguration route, resulting in chaos and clashes with law enforcement. The speaker, who has anti-establishment views, does not support the violence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Burning cars and smashed windows. A small group of protesters dressed in black, their faces covered, armed with hammers and bricks. Facing off with thousands of officers on-site, many in riot gear, confronting them with flashbang grenades and pepper spray. All of the sudden, police officers started to spray pepper spray and they got our audio technician. They're not gonna see us running because they're gonna throw more plastic.
The chaotic scene just blocks outside the security of the inauguration and parade route. I personally have anti establishment slants, but I don't think that this is anything that I wanna be
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
One of the best quality videos I’ve seen of the assassination attempt on Donald Trump from Start to finish. https://t.co/7JEG8gvr1V
@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker
“I think we came within a hairsbreadth of a second civil war in this country.” @VivekGRamaswamy puts the Trump assassinat*on attempt in historical context https://t.co/GMDTn1UgDA
@Bubblebathgirl - Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸
The Democrat Party is the party of violence, this video proves it https://t.co/SlBEe7FXZF
Video Transcript AI Summary
People should take to the streets because Trump is a dictator, and there needs to be unrest. Protests don't have to be polite. Someone should do something about Trump's immigration practices.
The biggest terror threat in the country is white men, mostly radicalized to the right. Someone should have punched Trump in the face after he called Mexicans rapists. If they were in high school, they would take him behind the gym and beat him up. Someone said that someone is still gonna have to put a bullet in Donald Trump. Where is John Wilkes Booth when you need him? Someone has thought about blowing up the White House.
A Missouri state senator is under investigation by the Secret Service after saying she hopes President Trump is assassinated. If you see anybody from that cabinet, create a crowd and push back on them. The domestic enemies to the voting system are at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. They're not gonna stop before or after election day, and they should not.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I I just don't even know why there aren't uprisings all over the country,
Speaker 1: and maybe there will be. People need to start taking to the streets. This is a dictator. You know, there needs to be unrest in the streets for as long as there's unrest in
Speaker 0: our lives. Enemies of the state.
Speaker 2: Show me where it says that protests are supposed to be polite and peaceful.
Speaker 0: Do something about your dad's immigration practices, you feckless.
Speaker 1: If they go low, we can't
Speaker 3: How do you resist the temptation to run up and ring her neck?
Speaker 1: Biggest terror threat in this country is white men. Most of them radicalized right up to the right.
Speaker 3: I thought he should have punched him in the face. So even if he lost, he insulted your wife. Yes.
Speaker 1: He came
Speaker 3: down the escalator and called Mexicans rapists immersed. He said, well, what do you think I should have done? So I think you should have punched him in the face and then gotten out of the race.
Speaker 1: He would have
Speaker 3: been a hero.
Speaker 1: I'd like to punch him in the face. I said, if we're in high school, I'd take him behind the gym and beat the hell out of him. Punch some people in the face. When was the last time an actor assassinated a president? They're still gonna have to go out and put a bullet in Donald Trump, and that's a fact.
Speaker 0: Look as his character is stabbed to death. Where is John Wilkes' booth when you need him?
Speaker 1: Put this way. Put it this way. Put it right there. Pull it up.
Speaker 0: I have thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House.
Speaker 2: A Missouri state senator is
Speaker 1: under investigation by the Secret Service after saying she hopes president Trump is assassinated. I will go and take Trump out tonight. And if you see anybody from that cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd, and you push back on them, and you tell them they're not welcome anymore, anywhere.
Speaker 0: And sadly, the domestic enemies to our voting system and our honoring our constitution, are right at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
Speaker 4: They're not gonna stop before election day in November, and
Speaker 5: they're not gonna stop after election day. And that should be everyone should take note of that on both levels that this isn't they're not gonna let up, and they should not.
Speaker 1: If you think we're lying now, you ain't saying nothing yet.
@Motabhai012 - Amit Shah (Parody)
@libsoftiktok 2.5 minutes of Democrats explicitly calling for using political vioIence. They own this. https://t.co/B1T8RfTJ3u
Video Transcript AI Summary
People should take to the streets because Trump is a dictator, and there needs to be unrest for as long as there's unrest in people's lives. Protests don't have to be polite and peaceful. Someone should have punched Trump in the face when he called Mexicans rapists. If they were in high school, they'd take him behind the gym and beat the hell out of him. Someone said that actors are still gonna have to put a bullet in Donald Trump, and that's a fact. Another person has thought a lot about blowing up the White House. A Missouri state senator is under investigation by the Secret Service after saying she hopes President Trump is assassinated. If you see anybody from that cabinet, create a crowd, push back on them, and tell them they're not welcome anymore, anywhere. The domestic enemies to the voting system and the Constitution are at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. They're not gonna stop before or after election day, and they should not.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I I just don't even know why there aren't uprisings all over the country,
Speaker 1: and maybe there will be. People need to start taking to the streets. This is a dictator. You know, there needs to be unrest in the streets for as long as there's unrest in
Speaker 0: our lives. Enemies of the state.
Speaker 2: Show me where it says that protests are supposed to be polite and peaceful.
Speaker 0: Do something about your dad's immigration practices, you feckless.
Speaker 1: If they go low, we can't
Speaker 3: How do you resist the temptation to run up and ring her neck?
Speaker 1: Biggest terror threat in this country is white men. Most of them radicalized right up to the right.
Speaker 3: I thought he should have punched him in the face. So even if he lost, he insulted your wife. Yes.
Speaker 1: He came
Speaker 3: down the escalator and called Mexicans rapists immersed. He said, well, what do you think I should have done? So I think you should have punched him in the face and then gotten out of the race.
Speaker 1: He would have
Speaker 3: been a hero.
Speaker 1: I'd like to punch him in the face. I said, if we're in high school, I'd take him behind the gym and beat the hell out of him. Punch some people in the face. When was the last time an actor assassinated a president? They're still gonna have to go out and put a bullet in Donald Trump, and that's a fact.
Speaker 0: Look as his character is stabbed to death. Where is John Wilkes' booth when you need him?
Speaker 1: Put this way. Put it this way. Put it right there. Pull it up.
Speaker 0: I have thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House.
Speaker 2: A Missouri state senator is
Speaker 1: under investigation by the Secret Service after saying she hopes president Trump is assassinated. I will go and take Trump out tonight. And if you see anybody from that cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd, and you push back on them, and you tell them they're not welcome anymore, anywhere.
Speaker 0: And sadly, the domestic enemies to our voting system and our honoring our constitution, are right at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
Speaker 4: They're not gonna stop before election day in November, and
Speaker 5: they're not gonna stop after election day. And that should be everyone should take note of that on both levels that this isn't they're not gonna let up, and they should not.
Speaker 1: If you think we're lying now, you ain't saying nothing yet.
@ImMeme0 - I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸
Every time Democrats bring up Jan6, be sure to share this video with them. https://t.co/ZAShQikc6q
Video Transcript AI Summary
The events on January 6th are often labeled as an insurrection, but this characterization is misleading. Initially, reports described it as a riot, and the term "insurrection" only emerged later to demonize those involved. The actions taken by citizens were a response to their frustrations, not an organized attempt to overthrow the government. For an event to be classified as an insurrection, there must be a clear hierarchy and intent to replace a government, which was not the case here. The Capitol remains intact, and the situation was not comparable to true insurrections seen elsewhere. It's important to educate young people about these distinctions and not let them be misled by sensationalized narratives.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The events that occurred on January 6th, we call them the capital event. Would you say that it was a demonstration in culture,
Speaker 1: or
Speaker 0: would you say that was a democratic demonstration?
Speaker 1: That's the first big lie Americans have ever been told in this country. Forget about Nixon. What are they calling? Insurrection. Insurrection, they call it.
It's so sad and cruel for a country to label young people who did what is just normal and put this label on them for the rest of their lives. Go and play every footage of the cameras that were there live that day. Okay? The live ones that saw the thing happening. Not a single reporter referred to it as an insurrection.
They said there is a riot at the capital. When do you think the word insurrection started? 5 PM when they have taken the rear back to the editorial room, and they know who was in office, and they're finding a way to demonize him. Somebody we expect we should start calling this an insurrection.
Speaker 0: Mhmm. Well, do you think that they only demonized him because they say that he lamented
Speaker 1: He didn't lament anything.
Speaker 0: That he
Speaker 1: What I believe is what happened at the Capitol is what is supposed to happen anyway. So if the citizens who elected these people, who pays for the building they live in and work in are pissed off and they want their voice to be heard, they went to the right place. That was not an insurrection. An insurrection requires a hierarchy, an insignia, a name, a mission, we call it an insurrection.
Speaker 0: Well, there's are people that would argue that they did have all of that. I'm not saying I'm not saying
Speaker 1: that we're saying. You and I watched it and you and I know 85 broken tooth, over tattooed, ponytail caves don't scare a war with flagpoles and take over a government. Number 2, for you to overthrow a government, a new government has to be in place for you to overthrow that government. So whom were they overthrowing on general 6 when a guy has 14 more days according to the constitution? I may be wrong.
If a general 6th, do you know who will continue as commander in chief? Yeah. The president.
Speaker 0: That's correct.
Speaker 1: So whom was he overthrowing? They wanted something to demonize him. They started calling it an insurrection. It was not an insurrection. Nothing has happened to America.
The capital is still intact. The kids went there and made noise. What was an insurrection? What was happened in Seattle when they took a whole town and held it hostage for weeks? What happened in Minnesota when they touched down private people's business and homes to the tune of $300,000,000?
That is an insurrection. We have to wake up and inform our young ones not to be bought into this nonsense. Nothing happened on January 6th.
@NanLee1124 - NanLee Marie Carissimi
Tucker Carlson and @RepClayHiggins discuss what actually happened on J6… this is an excellent account from Clay! @TCNetwork MUST-WATCH… https://t.co/Rr6VSGMd2j
Video Transcript AI Summary
Three years after January 6th, questions remain about the events of that day and the FBI's involvement. Congressman Clay Higgins directly questioned FBI Director Chris Wray about whether FBI assets were embedded among the protesters. Higgins asserts that evidence suggests the FBI had undercover agents dressed as Trump supporters inside the Capitol before the doors opened, potentially entrapping attendees. He estimates over 200 FBI assets were present, influencing the crowd and orchestrating actions leading to arrests. Higgins emphasizes the need for transparency and urges Speaker Mike Johnson to release all digital evidence from that day to the public, believing it will reveal the truth about the government's role in the events of January 6th.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It has been exactly 3 years since January 6th, the events of January 6th. The racist insurrection that shocked this nation to its core, more profoundly than anything since Pearl Harbor plus the civil war. And it has taken a while, honestly, even for people who aren't on the side of the professional liars to realize there's something amiss about what happened that day. Not just the response, the largest law enforcement mobilization in the history of the United States that was obviously disproportionate, because it wasn't the worst riot that year, not even close. But the day itself, there was something about January 6th that didn't feel right, and hovering over that day has remained the question to what extent was it a setup.
And we still don't really know, but what's interesting is how few people have asked that entirely legitimate question. One of the very few, really one of the only in the United States Congress, is a member called Clay Higgins from Louisiana. In case you haven't seen this clip, it's worth rewatching. This is from 2022 at Homeland Security Committee hearing where he asked it just directly of the FBI director. Why?
Speaker 1: Did the FBI have confidential human sources embedded within the January 6th protesters and on January 6, 2021?
Speaker 2: Well, Congressman, as I'm sure you can appreciate, I have to be very careful about what I can say about when
Speaker 1: Even now, that's what you told us a few
Speaker 2: years ago. Matt finish. About when we do and do not and where we have and have not used confidential human sources. But to the extent that there's a suggestion, for example, that the FBI's confidential human sources or FBI employees in some way instigated or orchestrated January 6th, that's categorically false.
Speaker 1: Did you have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters inside the capitol on January 6th prior to the doors being open?
Speaker 2: Again, I had to be very careful
Speaker 1: with what be a no. Can you not tell the American people no? We did not have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters positioned inside the capitol. Gentlemen, Pam has expired. You should
Speaker 2: not read anything into my decision not to share information Director Ray. Confidential.
Speaker 1: Gentleman's time has expired.
Speaker 0: What a sleazy, repulsive, little authoritarian liar Chris Wray is. That's obvious when you watch that tape. The sad part is so few tapes like that exist because so few have confronted him directly and asked questions to which the entire country has a right to know the answer like that one. Clay Higgins did that. Congressman from Louisiana Louisiana Lafayette joins us in studio.
Congressman, thanks so much for coming up.
Speaker 1: Thank you for having me, Tuck.
Speaker 0: So that was over a year ago that you asked that question, which is a central question, and you asked it as I think is appropriate without any embarrassment at all on behalf of your constituents and the rest of the country. Are you any closer to the answer now?
Speaker 1: Well, we're closer to being in a position where we can reveal the answers that we already have. Much of the evidence that we have compiled from investigative effort over the the course of the last couple of years. Some offices like my own would have operated in silos of investigative endeavor, have now been able to come together now that we have a republican majority and we have access to the to the to the staffs of the appropriate investigative committees. And so I sit on the oversight committee and we republicans run that committee now, therefore we control the staff. So when you can magnify the efforts that individual, members of congress have have have pushed within our own offices.
When you can magnify those efforts by the the skill and the numbers of staff from the committees, you you get a lot of evidence reviewed professionally and aligned and assembled into essentially a case file. And in in this case, this is a big file because the the the involvement of of certain actors, and you could say deep state actors within the federal government, to set the stage for, what happened in in j 4, 5, and 6, and and to, entrap thousands of Americans from across the country and lure them into this this set stage on j 4, 5, and 6. The people that were involved in that is is is quite a large web. So, yes, sir. We do have a great deal of evidence compiled, and we are we are gradually, professionally, rolling that evidence out.
So you sort
Speaker 0: of answered the question right there in larger terms. You just said that elements within the federal government, I assume law enforcement intel and military, and I'm using your words, lured Americans to Washington into what you called a trap. Yes, sir. So that would I mean, that's a shocking and I assume that's a that's a sober conclusion based on the evidence. That's what you're saying.
Speaker 1: That's that would be my sober assessment as an investigator, and I'm, you know, I'm quite a I love my country, and and I've I've always been a staunch defender of the thin blue line. And I I would proudly count the FBI amongst that number. They're just like brothers to me. So to find that level of, of conspiratorial corruption at the highest levels of the FBI has been very troubling to me as a man, as a cop, and and yet did you know, you follow the evidence wherever it leads, and Yes. This is what investigators do.
So, when I asked Christopher Wray that that question, for instance, I already knew the answer. I had reviewed compelling evidence that the that FBI had assets, human assets, dressed as Trump supporters inside the capitol prior to the doors being open and the masses allowed in. So now I I knew that the FBI was deeply involved. I'd seen evidence even at that time with, that the FBI had embedded themselves into various groups online across the country of Americans who were essentially voicing their their concerns and airing their grievances with each other about COVID oppression. Those Americans were targeted by the FBI, almost universally, Republicans and and, largely Trump supporters, but the FBI worked undercover to infiltrate those conversations and become a significant part of those individual Americans' communications.
And when you dig into the evidence that we've we've had revealed through through some criminal cases that I've I've followed and worked with the families of j six political detainees and Americans that have been persecuted for their involvement in in the capital that day. And some of that evidence is shockingly reveals that the the the FBI agents that were operating undercover within the online groups across the country were were the first ones to plant the seeds of of, suggestions of of a more radical occupation of the capital and and they were sort of testing the waters of who amongst that group would would begin acknowledging that, you know, yeah, may maybe we should do that. Maybe we should plan for an occupation like that. But if you look at the the origins of those conversations, it it was started by the the FBI undercover guy that was operating inside the group. And then months later, on January 4th, 5th, 6th, many of those Americans met for the first time in person when they gathered for the massive rally where American patriots assembled to object to to everything that had happened during 2020, the COVID oppression, and the the stunning results of what we believe was a compromised election cycle in November 2020.
So Americans gathered at their own capital to to appropriately air grievances and protest at their capital, but embedded amongst their number was an FBI asset that had been working from within their group online for many months. So this was the level of of manipulative effort that the FBI invested into American citizenry and our our assembly online to, and to exercise our rights under the first amendment, to talk to each other about whatever we wanna talk about, including the the the insidious suppressions of COVID that we were suffering across the country. So and our concerns about where the election was going, the whole mail in ballot thing, we could see the stage was being set for a compromised election cycle possibly, and to our horror that's what happened. So FBI had fingerprints on this thing from from many months prior to j 4, 5, and 6.
Speaker 0: I wanna go back to something you said in the first sentence, which is you have seen evidence and that's for your questions to Chris Wray that there were FBI assets dressed as Trump supporters within the capital. So that is proof of entrapment because, of course, the federal government could have prevented entry into the capital building. Aren't that many doors. You work there, you know. But they allowed people in on purpose to entrap them.
That's what that proves, I think. Does it not?
Speaker 1: Well, it's certainly condemning. It's another piece of the of the strategy that the that the government employed to sort of complete the entrapment of Americans that they had had, infiltrated and then prodded and provoked with online with the with the those original seeds planted of of, actions like, you know, what type of gear to wear and and and just in language that incited behavior that could go the wrong way. You know, pushing actions of of legal and legitimate peaceful protest to an edge where where those Americans would likely not have gone had they not been been, you know, encouraged by the FBI plant amongst their number that they didn't know was there. So by the time it was actually j 6 and you had you had, masses of Americans assembled outside the capitol, almost, like, 99.9%, 100% peaceful. On the inside, you had FBI assets dressed as Trump supporters that knew their way around the capitol.
Before the doors even open. Before the doors open. Or else how are you gonna get around the capitol? You've been there many times. You need a guide to get from whatever door you go in.
It's a labyrinth. It's, yeah, it's it's a maze inside there. So you that's right. So there's no way just Americans, most of which, had never been to the capitol, There's no way they can come in some random door that gets opened and then get their way directly to the to the statuary or the house chamber or the senate chamber. It's just not possible.
So the the the FBI assets that were dressed as Trump supporters that were inside the capitol were there, I believe, and evidence indicates that they were there to to specifically waive in the the Trump supporters that had gathered outside the capitol, and the doors open and they were allowed in. And on the inside were were oh, there's some more Trump supporters, but really those were FBI assets, law enforcement assets that knew their way around the capital. And they they waved those guys in, said, come on. Follow us. And they they're the ones that led them on the path directly.
Now how do you think of guys? Never been to the capital. Gotta gotta come into the capitol all amped up on on emotion and make his way straight to Nancy Pelosi's office. Come on. It's like I couldn't get to there's no way.
I've been there for 7 years. Could come in some random door at the capitol and make my way to Nashville. Everything is unmarked.
Speaker 0: I mean, those leadership offices are unmarked. So how would
Speaker 1: you know? It's confusing to get around in the capitol. Every American that has been there knows this. When you go on a tour, you bring your family to DC, you go through the capital, you have to have a guide. And and on January 6th, the guides were FBI assets, the law enforcement assets, and they were dressed as Trump supporters.
They were positioned inside the capitol prior to the doors being open so that the Americans that had assembled outside the capitol, once allowed in, could be brought directly to the areas where the FBI, the DOJ, and the deep state actors knew would be the most, the most sort of condemning criminal action of of Americans being a lot being inside the capital, protesting without permit and things. So they knew they were setting the stage for arrest and prosecution. It's such a crime. Who who planned this, do you think? I think factions planned this.
I wouldn't say who talked about it because that, yeah, I don't think there was one person that that planned this, but I believe the the faction of, establishment liberals within the FBI and the Democrat Party and our intelligence services to to another extent, use their massive powers of surveillance and, investigative, assets that they have across the country, confidential informants, registered informants, non registered informants, voluntary informants. It's a it's a complex web of of FBI assets across the country that can be activated. So if you have authority at some of the highest levels in the FBI, it doesn't take much, the faction within the FBI and within our intelligence services that would coordinate with with the most extreme liberal, factions within a Democrat party that were desperate to keep Trump out of office, and and, you know, worked within the the theater of operations, shall we say, that had been that had been set by the COVID alleged medical emergencies nationwide and millions and millions of mail in ballots. There's no daylight between the the compromised election cycle of November 2020 and ultimately what happened on on on j6. So you ask who planned this?
This would be the combination of several several of the most extreme liberal anti Trump, anti America First factions that, that were in positions of authority within our federal law enforcement organizations and the the Democrat party across the country.
Speaker 0: Can when you say that there were FBI assets in the crowd, it in the building beforehand and and certainly outside, What's the scale of this? You're talking, like, 10, 20? No.
Speaker 1: Based upon some very conservative, but, like, hard investigative effort evaluation of of the numbers from putting together eyewitnesses and and videos and, and affidavit statement, and whistleblower statements, and court records that have been revealed through individual criminal cases where j6 defendants have been prosecuted, and smart attorneys have forced, admissions by the DOJ and the FBI, but those admissions have been sealed within the parameter of that criminal case by protective order by the judge, so they I I can't share them, but I've seen them. So real hard objective and conservative, estimates would would put the number of FBI assets in the crowd outside and working inside at at well over 200. 200? Yeah.
Speaker 0: Yeah. So you're in law enforcement. Yeah. Yep. Before you came to congress in the military as well, that seemed that's an extraordinary number.
Is it?
Speaker 1: Well, no. When you think about the scope of the operation, if you were gonna do this, you would need you would
Speaker 0: need that relative to so like when, I don't know, Minneapolis burned down or when Saint John's, the Episcopal Church of Carson, the White House in Lafayette Square was set ablaze, and all the secret service agents were injured. Were there 200 FBI assets in the crowd among Antifa then?
Speaker 1: I mean, I I don't know how many undercover agents FBI would have in a situation like that, but but but but j 6 was the was the was the final act prior to arrest and prosecution of of Americans that that were identified as as Trump supporters. I mean, the objective was to destroy the entire MAGA movement, to to forever stain the, the patriotic fervor that was associated with with the America First Mega Movement that had won in 2016 and we believe won again in 2020, and the the establishment on both sides, both major parties were determined to smash that out of existence, not just by defeating Trump, but by destroying the reputations of the movement itself by creating this narrative that was totally false, but was heavily pushed that mega Republicans, America First Republicans are somehow a danger to our republic and a a domestic terror threat, which is a whole another story about what the FBI has done to tagging Americans as, suspected domestic terrorists and and following us as we travel across the country. But the the bottom line is that, 200 as a I I believe is a conservative number. First of all, I think there were there's many more, But a number that I'm comfortable going on record with is that we believe that there were that there were easily 200 FBI undercover assets operating in the crowd, outside the capital, embedded into groups that entered the capital or provoked entry of the capital, and working with FBI assets that would have included Metro Police and Capitol Police that would dress as Trump supporters inside the capital because those were the guys that knew their way around the capitol.
So given the scope of the operation and the number of doors where entry was allowed or even encouraged, and the number of people that were actually outside the capital and it entered, we believe 200 is a conservative number. Yes, sir.
Speaker 0: It's it's shocking what you're saying. It confirms everyone's worst suspicions about this. It's clearly true. Did you come across any evidence that the the DOD, the military, either Defense Intelligence Agency or National Guard or any part of the US military played any role in this at all?
Speaker 1: I have not seen that. I've heard the echoes of that suspicion, and I have I have observed, circumstantial evidence that that has been presented to me, that I've that I have reviewed, but to but to me, it does not rise to the level that I would call actionable from an investigative perspective. So there's some there was some suspicion, but in in in law enforcement the thresholds you're looking across is reasonable suspicion that would prompt a criminal investigation, and then the next threshold is probable cause, which you need for arrest. And then of course in our system, finally, the last threshold is is, is conviction, guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. So the I I did review evidence, Tucker, regarding some suspicions of military involvement in some way, but and I and I've I have reviewed some of that evidence that that had been that I've been able to get my hands on, and, I do not think that the the military was, was involved, not at the level, most certainly not at the level of the of the FBI and, over the course of all of 2020.
And then on j 4, 5, and 6, the FBI working in coordination with other law enforcement assets that that they roped into the operation Right. From Metro PD, from DC, and and, the Capitol Police was sort of sort of tricked into participating with the with what the FBI had been staging for, you know, 10 months. Just a bit
Speaker 0: if you take 3 steps back, this is not democracy. So the federal agencies serve under the oversight of the elected president, and then on under the oversight of the elected congress. Their elected people get to make the decisions. You have a Republican president. You now have a Republican congress, and neither one can get a straight answer from the FBI.
No no one has any control of the FBI. You're describing a government within a government.
Speaker 1: Well, in America, a question becomes reasonable men would would would ask when we face a crisis like this, who investigates the investigate? Right. And the answer in America is is congress. So we we have the responsibility to investigate through the appropriate committees, which would we're certainly we're certainly doing that now that we have a republican majority in control of the committees, but we don't have the power to arrest. We can we can give criminal referrals based upon our investigative efforts, but we have to have a DOJ that's receptive to the criminal referrals.
So we we've hit quite a a brick wall, have we not? Constitutionally, we we have the responsibility to investigate objectively, and and and anyone that knows me know that's exactly what I'm I'm pursuing. I do not have I'm not trying to create a crime to fit a narrative to blame on the FBI. I'm following the evidence, and and to my horror, it implicates our FBI at the highest level, and a and a a conspiracy within our government at the highest level to create the the, to set the stage for a compromised election cycle in 2020, and then the the the actions that took place on j 4, 5, and 6, and then the the criminal investigation, arrest, and prosecution of Americans that they were able to entrap and document with the thousands of cameras that were operating that day and use that evidence that they knew they were setting up to investigate, arrest, and prosecute the Americans that they had entrapped. So Congress can investigate these things, and we and we are, and we will reveal these horrific truths, and we will have criminal referrals.
But until you have a a a president running the executive branch that will clean house at the DOJ and FBI at the highest levels and put American patriots in place that will be that will act upon the criminal referrals that that congress provides, then none of those guys are gonna get arrested because they're not gonna arrest themselves, and we don't have arrest authority.
Speaker 0: I'm a little surprised and don't expect to be critical of your colleagues in the Republican conference, but, I mean, they do control the house. Impeachment is a thing. Chris Wray is still the FBI director. I watched Republicans, some of whom I know, cheer the murder of Ashley Babbitt who was unarmed woman less than 55, by Michael Byrd. They were Michael Byrd side, and it I have to say for a lot of Republican voters and I count myself among them.
Very clarifying. If you're cheering Ashley Babbitt's murder shooting women now, that's okay because she likes Trump. And the Republicans were like, yeah. I was happy. Like, a lot of them thought that.
What the hell?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I was and it it made me sick. Me too. You know, I'm there's a a great responsibility when you when you wear a badge in America. I mean, think about it.
To be to be the to be the designated servant of your community that has that has the the authority to, to deny the freedom of a fellow American in the land of the free. Like, that's a heavy responsibility. So the the escalation of of force is must be appropriate in order to affect a lawful arrest, and and a a bad a bad shoot is the worst thing that an officer can possibly be involved in in his in his career. It's it's, you know, we it's it's it's the thing of nightmares for for good police officers. So to take what was what was from a law enforcement perspective was clearly a bad shoot because there's some basic rules you just cannot violate.
You have to attempt to effect an arrest before you can go to deadly force. There was there was no attempt to arrest Ashley Batman. There were there were officers on the other side of the window she was climbing through. There were officers on the interior side of the window she was climbing through. There was no indication that had been that this had been going on for an hour, and there was there was no reports on the radio or anywhere else of of gunfights.
So there was no reason at that point to expect that Ashley Babin or anybody else in the in the crowd was gonna produce a firearm and start firing on police officers. Why? Because it had not happened. So that's part of the totality of circumstance that a police officer is responsible for knowing. We stay in constant communication with our radios.
We know what's going on. That officer that that that pulled that trigger would shot a a American woman who was clearly in a in like a physically compromised position climbing through the broken glass of a of a window is not, you know, it's not like she just stepped into the cage in MMA and she was ready to fight. She was climbing through a window draped in a flag. There's police officers on the other side of the window. There's police officers on the interior side of the window.
So you have plenty enough officer presence. If you wanna arrest that woman, then by all means, pull it through the window, you know, put flex cuffs on her and throw her in the corner. We'll get to you later, ma'am. We're kinda busy right now. That's what you do.
You'd have grabbed that woman and pulled her through the and threw her in the corner, or handed her back to somebody that could pull her back, you know, from that front line right there. So understand that very well, I understand officers have to make split second decisions, but you never you never make a decision to use lethal force unless it's absolutely called for and required, if you're losing a fight attempting to effect an arrest, then then, yeah, if if there's if if the officer's life is in danger and he's all by himself, but there's never should be a circumstance where you just pull the trigger and a woman climbing through a window that's clearly unarmed. There's no evidence of gunplay from the crowd that she's coming from. You got officers on both side of where she is. If you gotta arrest her, then by all means, arrest her.
You know, to put flex cups on her and and move on. So, you know, she'd nannle the next person trying to come through the window, but she don't shoot her. So that was a
Speaker 0: bad issue. An invest a reveal investigation. Was cheered.
Speaker 1: Yep. Why do you think that was? And there's this in there's this insanity that has taken hold in the in the the minds and hearts of many otherwise reasonable American citizens where they did they they hate Trump so much. Like, they're they're so deeply embedded, and they're they've sold their souls to the establishment that when we had an America first president and and he and he, like, stopped the, the military industrial complex forward momentum and and he and he began restoring power to individual members of congress and restoring individual rights and freedoms and sovereignty of the state, and he took away the actions of the cartels and and brought this this real common sense approach to the executive branch and was leading our country in that beautiful direction. This was interfering with the business model of the establishment.
So many career politicians on both sides of the aisle, and I, you know, I don't like those guys, man. I'm not one of them. And I I served my country in congress, but, I I don't consider myself a politician by any means. I'm a servant to We The People. Some of these guys, man, they pop out of the womb to be to be politicians.
They get groomed their whole life, you know, to be a a career politician. And those are the ones that had this instinctive cheer for something really bad happening to a Trump supporter. You know, they their true color showed in that moment and was an ugly color. Yeah. That's it.
Speaker 0: We shouldn't be shooting women, number 1. I couldn't agree more. So where where does this go from here? You have this corpus of information. It sounds like it's definitive.
When does the public see the detail, and what's the process after that?
Speaker 1: It's a good question. So evidence from criminal investigations by nature is rather secretive, but there is a, a tremendous compilation of data that I think should be made completely available to the public, and that's the digital files from from j 4, 5, and 6. This is where, speaker Mike Johnson can be a champion for for that will be remembered for throughout history as the speaker of the house that fully released unredacted, digital files from j 4, 5, and 6 completely to the American people. And within that data, there is full truth, and and the American people, it is the only staff large enough to, you know, frame by frame, go through 80,000 hours of digital evidence. Nobody has a staff big enough to do that, but we can crowdsource it to the American people.
So you ask when will this evidence be released? I'd I've I've been encouraging speaker Johnson, as I did speaker McCarthy, to, my god, man, release this data to the American people.
Speaker 0: Why won't why won't they?
Speaker 1: I believe speaker Johnson will, but but Mike is a is is quite a skilled constitutionalist attorney himself, and he's a very measured, patient, faithful man. So, I have I extend trust to to speaker Johnson when he says that it's his intention to fully release the the call the j6 tapes, but really it's digital evidence, it's more than it's more than just video evidence, it's it's a lot. You know, radio transcripts, the whole thing. I I believe my speaker Johnson knows that this is a significant, duty that he must he he he must perform for the American people. It's a moment in history where where, you know, I believe our lord and savior has placed him in that in that position of service to the country, and he has a responsibility to to fully release that data.
And then the American people will see for themselves what some of us have already learned to our horror to be true.
Speaker 0: Congressman Hinggens, thank you very much. Free speech is bigger than any one person or any one organization. Societies are defined by what they will not commit. What we're watching is the total inversion of virtue.
@gracieback2 - Mischief 🌿🌹🌿🌹🌿🌹🌿🌹🌿
✨NEVER FORGET… ✨WHAT THE GOVERNMENT DID ✨TO OUR JANUARY 6th HEROES https://t.co/yzFthD9jTX
@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones
This is just one of many videos from Jan 6th documenting that leftist/Antifa, posing as MAGA, were already inside the Capitol as it all stated helping their comrades break in… https://t.co/Hk64LBSLu0
Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a glass in the other room that can be dropped down into a room underneath it if somebody is getting broken. The room also has two doors: one in the rear and one to the right when entering. People should coordinate if they are going to take the building.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's the floor plan? Hey, guys. I've been in the other room. Listen to me. In the other room on the other side of this door, right here where these feet are standing, there is a glass that if somebody is getting broken, you can drop down into a room underneath it.
There's also two doors in the other room. One in the rear and one to the right when you go in. So people should probably coordinate together if you're gonna take this building.
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
Two and a half minutes straight of Democrats calling for violence. The Democratic Party is the party of violence. https://t.co/mCTd0CbCnJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
People should take to the streets, as protests don't have to be polite or peaceful. One speaker questioned resisting the urge to "wring her neck." Another stated that the biggest terror threat in the country is white men, mostly radicalized right-wingers.
One speaker wished they had punched Trump in the face after he called Mexicans rapists and murderers. Another said they'd like to punch him in the face or "beat the hell out of him." Someone asked, "When was the last time an actor assassinated a president?" and stated, "They're still gonna have to go out and put a bullet in Donald Trump, and that's a fact." Another asked, "Where is John Wilkes Booth when you need him?" and admitted to thinking "an awful lot about blowing up the White House."
A Missouri state senator is under investigation for saying she hopes Trump is assassinated. People are encouraged to confront members of Trump's cabinet in public. One speaker stated that domestic enemies to the voting system are at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Another claimed "they're not gonna let up, and they should not."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I I just don't even know why there aren't uprisings all over the country, and maybe there will be.
Speaker 1: People need to start taking to the streets. This is a dictator. You know, there needs to be unrest in the streets for as long as there's unrest in our lives. Enemies of the state. Show me where it says that protests are supposed to be polite and peaceful.
Do something about your dad's immigration practices, you feckless When they go low, we kid
Speaker 2: How do you resist the temptation to run up and wring her neck?
Speaker 1: Biggest terror threat in this country is white men, most of them radicalized right up to the right.
Speaker 2: I thought you should have punched him in the face. I said, even if you lost, he insulted your wife. Yes. He came down the escalator and called Mexicans rapists and murderers. He said, well, what do you think I should have done?
Said, I think you should punch him in the face and then gotten out of the race. He would have been a hero.
Speaker 1: I'd like to punch him in the face. I said, if we're in high school, I'd take him behind the gym and beat the hell out of him. Punch some people in the face. When was the last time an actor assassinated a president? They're still gonna have to go out and put a bullet in Donald Trump, and that's a fact.
Speaker 3: Look as his character is stabbed to death. Where is John Wilkes Booth when you need him?
Speaker 1: Put this way. Put it right here. Put right there. Pull it I
Speaker 3: have thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House.
Speaker 1: A Missouri state senator is under investigation by the Secret Service after saying she hopes president Trump is assassinated. I will go and take Trump out tonight. And if you see anybody from that cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd, and you push back on them, and you tell them they are not welcome anymore, anywhere.
Speaker 0: And sadly, the domestic enemies to our voting system and our honoring our constitution are right at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
Speaker 3: They're not gonna stop before election day in November, and they're not gonna stop after election day. And that should be everyone should take note of that on both levels that this isn't they're not gonna let up, and they should not.
Speaker 1: If you think we're rallying now, you ain't seen nothing yet.