TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

Bobby_Network
Posted - September 27, 2022 at 6:20 PM
Saved - June 30, 2023 at 6:18 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The presence of the USS Kearsarge in the Baltic Sea with transponders off raised questions. Joe Biden, Luisamneubauer, ABaerbock, and radeksikorski's statements added to the intrigue. Jet fuel's ability to melt steel pipes was questioned. AI art added a touch of surrealism. The CIA's intentions were questioned, along with Russia's pipeline plans. The alleged poisoning of Navalny and the cancellation of Nordstream 2 were discussed. The possibility of CIA force bombing Europe for a Green Agenda was raised. The core questions revolved around perception and the Joepedo meme. The completion of Poland's gas pipeline coincided with the Nordstream 2 incident. Finnish Interior Minister's fainting incident raised suspicions. The Atlantic Council's stance on ending Nord Stream 2 was highlighted. German MSM blamed Russia, while underwater sabotage shots were leaked. ZelenskyyUa's actions and NATO's response were mentioned. ZelenskyyUa's discovery of a billion dollars and a villain in Miami was noted. Energy pills, OPEC's stance, and ZelenskyyUa's desire for a preemptive NATO strike were discussed. Soros' alleged plans and Elon Musk's involvement were mentioned.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

Why was the USS Kearsarge there with transponders off some weeks ago? https://ndr.de/nachrichten/schleswig-holstein/US-Navy-zeigt-Flagge-in-der-oestlichen-Ostsee,usnavy102.html… https://www-ndr-de.translate.goog/nachrichten/schleswig-holstein/US-Navy-zeigt-Flagge-in-der-oestlichen-Ostsee,usnavy102.html?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en… What did @JoeBiden mean by this? What did @Luisamneubauer mean? What did @ABaerbock hint? What did @radeksikorski mean by this? QRD: https://twitter.com/Bobby_Network/status/1569248548180336640 https://www.ndr.de/nachrichten/schleswig-holstein/US-Navy-zeigt-Flagge-in-der-oestlichen-Ostsee,usnavy102.html https://www-ndr-de.translate.goog/nachrichten/schleswig-holstein/US-Navy-zeigt-Flagge-in-der-oestlichen-Ostsee,usnavy102.html?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en What

US Navy zeigt Flagge in der östlichen Ostsee Der größte Kampfverband der US Navy seit Ende des Kalten Krieges ist unterwegs in die östliche Ostsee. Experten verstehen das als Zeichen der Unterstützung für das Baltikum und Skandinavien - und als Botschaft der Entschlossenheit gegenüber Russland. ndr.de
US Navy zeigt Flagge in der östlichen Ostsee Der größte Kampfverband der US Navy seit Ende des Kalten Krieges ist unterwegs in die östliche Ostsee. Experten verstehen das als Zeichen der Unterstützung für das Baltikum und Skandinavien - und als Botschaft der Entschlossenheit gegenüber Russland. www-ndr-de.translate.goog

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

Add.#73: Reading Time: 2019 DoD Doc, @librarycongress: Topics: US pulling out of INF Nuclear treaty Reapproving Leathal Aid supply to 🇺🇦 Drawing 🇷🇺 into a war in 🇺🇦 Applying hard sanctions on 🇷🇺 Oil & Gas Pressuring 🇸🇪 and 🇫🇮 to join @NATO (thx2AnonFren) https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR3000/RR3063/RAND_RR3063.pdf

PAGE NOT AVAILABLE (Error 404) rand.org

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

Can Jetfuel melt steel pipes?

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

Some accompanying AI art for the proper surrealism.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

What did the @CIA mean by this?

@TheInsiderPaper - Insider Paper

JUST IN 🚨 The CIA had weeks ago warned Germany about possible attacks on gas pipelines in the Baltic Sea - German magazine Spiegel

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

Remember when Russia tried to establish a pipeline through Syria? [Gentle Reminder: Can't Mossad The Assad] More fails from Poland: https://archive.ph/dvQ5m

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

Remember when @CIA (most probably) poisoned their own spooks-asset Navalny then pushed the "Putin-did-it"-legend to achieve cancellation of Nordstream 2? https://web.archive.org/web/20220321150846/https://strategic-culture.org/news/2020/12/28/navalny-poisoning-cia-mi6-discredited-state-funded-bellingcat-play-key-role-in-accusing-russia/ https://archive.ph/bWzZC That was a funny time, not? https://archive.ph/wip/I4mXd

Navalny Poisoning: CIA, MI6, ‘Discredited’ State-Funded Bellingcat Play Key role in Accusing Russia Western media coverage has overlooked the key role of the CIA, MI6, and the NATO member state-funded outlet Bellingcat in generating the allegation that Russia’s… web.archive.org

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

Every action the Ukraine takes is coordinated with the US Govt. This recent delivery of underwater drones is interesting. They operate up to a depth of 100 meters. The pipeline explosions were at a depths of 70-90 meters. Go figure. https://www.thedefensepost.com/2022/08/30/uk-mine-hunting-drones-ukraine/

UK Donates Underwater Drones to Ukraine for Mine-Hunting The United Kingdom has announced the delivery of six lightweight underwater drones to Ukraine to hunt Russian mines on its coastlines. thedefensepost.com

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

Is @CIA force bombing Europe to a "Green Agenda" to weaken Russia's "Nordstream 2"? (Yes) If 🇩🇪 wanted Total Escalation, they would've sent their Leopards to 🇺🇦, but they didn't. Why? Because 🇩🇪 always negotiates with 🇷🇺(silently). https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-09-15/ukraine-must-get-german-leopard-tanks-asap-for-the-next-phase-of-the-war

@aaronjmate - Aaron Maté

In response to Europe's energy crisis, Putin said on Sept. 17 that if Europe wants to solve the issue, it can ignore US orders and open up the Nord Steam 2 pipeline. "Just push the button and everything will get going," Putin said. Instead, someone bombed it.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

The core question: How much "Planet of the Apes" is allowed in your perceptional sphere? This is all such a Crazy Clown Time (© @LynchFoundation, https://youtu.be/6QJpY2VNP0E) , I can't even believe that @CIA & @JoeBiden are pulling this off that blatantly.

@StateDept - Department of State

.@UnderSecStateP Victoria Nuland: “If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
We are in ongoing discussions with Germany about Nord Stream 2. It is important to note that if Russia invades Ukraine, Nord Stream 2 will not proceed.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: With regard to Nord Stream 2, we continue to have, very strong and clear conversations, with our German allies, and I want to be clear with you today. If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

The second core question: Are we now finally able to understand the "Joepedo" meme properly? Sub-Question: Can Joepedos melt steel pipelines? Answer: Yes.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

This meme is obligatory, don't you think? We have to extend our questionaire: Can joepedos melt vintage passports in the Baltic Sea? https://archive.ph/JWOq0

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

June: Quote:"Baltic Sea - ... assigned to Explosive Ordnance Disposal Mobile Unit ... , prepares mock explosives for a pierside training event during exercise BALTOPS 22, June 10. @USNavy" August: "Controlled Escalation", AIS OFF https://www-ndr-de.translate.goog/nachrichten/schleswig-holstein/US-Navy-zeigt-Flagge-in-der-oestlichen-Ostsee,usnavy102.html?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en https://seapowermagazine.org/baltops-22-a-perfect-opportunity-for-research-and-resting-new-technology/

US Navy zeigt Flagge in der östlichen Ostsee Der größte Kampfverband der US Navy seit Ende des Kalten Krieges ist unterwegs in die östliche Ostsee. Experten verstehen das als Zeichen der Unterstützung für das Baltikum und Skandinavien - und als Botschaft der Entschlossenheit gegenüber Russland. www-ndr-de.translate.goog
BALTOPS 22: A Perfect Opportunity for Research and Resting New Technology  - Seapower BALTIC SEA — A significant focus of BALTOPS every year is the demonstration of NATO mine hunting capabilities, and this year the U.S. Navy continues to use the exercise as an opportunity to test emerging technology, U.S. Naval Forces Europe-Africa... seapowermagazine.org

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

Time for a relaxing Nordstream 2 Shot. Question: Can meth melt steel pipes? [meme by anon frens]

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

Crazy Clown Time: "New Polish gas pipeline from Norway to reach full capacity ahead of schedule" In other words: Poland's new pipeline - competitor to Russian gas - literally being completed the very same week when NS2 was blown up https://notesfrompoland.com/2022/09/26/new-polish-gas-pipeline-from-norway-to-reach-full-capacity-ahead-of-schedule/ https://archive.ph/wip/XR2Sf

New Polish gas pipeline from Norway to reach full capacity ahead of schedule The Baltic Pipe, due to open this week, will be able to transport up to twice as much gas as planned from Norway to Poland this year. notesfrompoland.com

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

Meanwhile: "🇫🇮Finnish Interior Minister goes faint at a government briefing on the explosions on the NordStream" Let's leave that uncommented meanwhile (oh god, was it nerve gas by the Russians?????ßßß? The Navalny Effect?????ßßß????ßPUtinHitler).

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

Blasts from the past by @AtlanticCouncil. Quote: "Stay the course on ending Nord Stream 2" So it was a strategic goal all along, since at least March 2021. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/issue-brief/biden-and-ukraine-a-strategy-for-the-new-administration/ https://archive.ph/z4YvN

Biden and Ukraine: A strategy for the new administration Joe Biden has an opportunity to fix relations with Ukraine after the turbulence of his predecessor. This is a strategy for his administration. atlanticcouncil.org

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

Why were US Blackhawk helicopters circling over the explosion sites of the Nord Stream pipelines several times in September? They hovered over the incident sites for hours on the night of Sept 22 and 25. https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/us-military-aircraft-circled-nord-stream-incident-site-in-se

US military aircraft circled Nord Stream incident site in September The US military reportedly carried out sorties over the future site of the Nord Stream pipeline "incident" in the Baltic Sea. english.almayadeen.net

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

Meanwhile: German MSM is on the "Muuuh-Putin-did-it"-train. The answer: Russian Sabotage-War-Dolphins Crazy Clown Time is coming to an interim climax. [only in 🇩🇪, automatic subs here: https://youtu.be/vu3qPYcgs30] You gotta love the C-Class Script-Leftovers.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Satellite images reveal two dolphin pools at the entrance of Sevastopol harbor on the Russian-occupied Crimean Peninsula. However, the depth of the sea in the Baltic Sea makes it challenging for dolphins to be used there. The use of dolphins for terror attacks is complex due to the significant water depth. While a diver could reach a depth of 50 meters, the use of 100 kilograms of TNT explosives makes it unlikely for a single diver to carry out such an attack. It is more plausible that technical means, such as submarines or underwater drones, were used. These drones are commonly used for surveillance and could potentially be used for attacks on pipelines. Access to the pipeline system would be necessary for the use of remotely controlled cleaning robots, which could also be armed with explosives.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Und im Frühjahr sollen Satellitenbilder zeigen, wie sich hier links im Bild an der Hafeneinfahrt von Sevastopol auf der russisch besetzten Halbinsel Krim zwei Delfinbecken befinden. Auch in der Ostsee ist ihr Einsatz theoretisch möglich. Speaker 1: Ich weiß, dass es diese Delfine gibt, allerdings ist die Wassertiefe von achtzig Metern oder siebzig bis achtzig Metern in den beiden Seegebieten zyklischer Nordöstlich von Bornholm schon ein schon eine erhebliche Wassertiefe. Speaker 0: Kein einfacher Terroreinsatz für Tier und Mensch. Theoretisch Könnte Speaker 2: ein Froschmann alleine fünfzig Meter tauchen, also das wäre wäre drin. Allerdings reden wir über hundert Kilogramm TNT Sprengstoff. Das haben seismische Untersuchungen in Schweden ergeben, die haben diese diese Explosion analysiert. Hundert Kilogramm TNT ist nichts, was man sich, glaub ich, auf den auf den Rucksack sozusagen Speaker 0: Technische Hilfsmittel müssten demnach im Spiel gewesen sein, denn Despot aus Moskau mag U-Boote. Doch in der Gegend Bornholm ist die Ostsee kaum mehr als hundert Meter tief und gut überwacht. Unwahrscheinlich, dass ein U-Boot nicht aufgefallen wäre. Ein weiteres Szenario, ein Angriff mit einer Unterwasserdrohne. Speaker 1: Ich nehme an, dass es über Drohnen geplant und durchgeführt worden ist. Und man muss dabei ja auch sehen, dass abgesehen von den militärischen Drohnen, die dafür natürlich auch geeignet sind, es auch möglich ist, Das ist Drohnenwahn, die normalerweise für die Überwachung dieser Pipelines natürlich auch eingesetzt werden, auch eingesetzt werden müssen. Das ist ja auch nicht in der Ostsee so. Also insofern deutet alles darauf hin, dass es technische Mittel waren, die sowohl militärisch als auch zivil eingesetzt werden können. Speaker 0: An den Pipelines soll es ferngesteuerte Reinigungsroboter geben. Die könnten auch mit Sprengstoff bestückt worden sein, sofern die Täter Zugang zu dem Speaker 1: System haben.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

Meanwhile: Possibly Super Secret Underwater Shot leaked of the sabotage. Luisa is finally bringing freedom to Germany (together with her soul partner[s]).

@Luisamneubauer - Luisa Neubauer

🚨 Breaking: Wir sprechen heute Mittag mit Finanzminister @c_lindner über die Bereitstellung eines 100 Milliarden Sondervermögen für Klimaschutz und Sicherheit. Lindner sieht die Erneuerbaren als Freiheitsenergien. Das sehen wir auch so. 1/3

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

Meanwhile, more fails from Poland: @radeksikorski deletes his "Thank You, USA" tweet, but as expected - it has been archived over and over again. Radek, are you an internet noob? https://archive.ph/tlnh6 https://t.co/ACpyomF00n* (add the * at the end of the URL for all archives)

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

Meanwhile: @ZelenskyyUa "accelerates" @NATO-membership Russia annexes 4 more regions @NATO Chief Stollenberg: "Now we cannot accept Ukraine into NATO" QRD: >receive NATO weapons, training, strategy, foreign NATO soldiers... >"no you cannot join NATO"

@AnnuKaushik253 - Annu Kaushik

Few hours back, Ukraine applied for fast-track NATO membership calling itself a de facto ally. When asked about the same at a presser, NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg gave a vague answer saying that the priority right now is to help Ukraine.👇 #UkraineWar #RussianUkrainianWar

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ukraine has officially applied for NATO membership, and the question is whether NATO is ready to consider their application. NATO states that every democracy in Europe has the right to apply for membership, and they respect Ukraine's right to choose its own security arrangements. However, the decision on membership needs to be taken by all 30 Allies through consensus. Currently, NATO's main focus is providing immediate support to Ukraine in defending itself against the Russian invasion.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ukraine leadership show us the possible way out of this bloody war and officially applied to NATO membership. My question is NATO ready to consider that kind of applications? And the second part of the question, Is it possible to consider this PD procedure for that kind of membership like it was done for Sweden and Finland? Thank you so much. Speaker 1: Every democracy in Europe has the right to apply for NATO membership, and NATO allies respect [SPEAKER STAVROS VIZIRGIANAKIS:] That's right. And we have stated again and again that NATO's door remains open and we have demonstrated that over the last years. NATO Allies, when they met at the NATO Summit in Madrid, stated also very clearly that We support Ukraine's right to choose its own its own path, to decide, what kind of Security arrangements we want to be part of. Then, a decision on membership, of course, has to be taken by all 30 Allies, and we take these decisions by consensus. Our focus now, is on providing immediate support to Ukraine to help Ukraine defend itself against The Russian brutal invasion, and then that's the main focus and the main effort of NATO allies as we speak.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

After so many happenings, it's time for a relaxing @ZelenskyyUa afterhour. https://eprimefeed.com/latest-news/zelensky-found-a-billion-dollars-and-a-villa-in-miami-2/20181/

Zelensky Found a Billion Dollars and a Villa in Miami - ePrimefeed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has more than one billion dollars in foreign accounts. This was announced by the deputy from the Opposition Platform – Party For Life Ilya Kiva. According to him, Zelensky has accumulated $1.2 billion in the Dresdner Bank in Costa Rica from Ukrainian oligarchs like Rinat Akhmetov, Viktor Pinchuk, and Igor Kolomoisky. […] eprimefeed.com

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

Add.#18: Intermission. (thx 2 Daniela 4 pointing out)

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

QRD: •🇶🇦 drops EnergyPills: https://archive.ph/r4Zf0 •@OPECSecretariat sides with 🇷🇺-according to Joepedo •@ZelenskyyUa seeks preemtive @NATO strike: https://archive.ph/ehbYP •@georgesoros drafts Any-Time-Mass-Sex-Orgy near Kyiv •@elonmusk's shitposting https://t.co/rVnVo0Oee7

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

War is the ultimate Supreme Court

KanekoaTheGreat
Posted - February 8, 2023 at 7:31 PM
Saved - February 10, 2023 at 6:10 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Nord Stream 2 pipeline has been a topic of controversy, with the US and Germany at odds over its construction. Recently, there have been reports of sabotage, with the CIA warning of possible attacks on the pipelines. Some have speculated that the US government may have been involved in the sabotage, with the Navy and NATO holding a training exercise in the area where the pipelines were later sabotaged. The situation is further complicated by the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, with some suggesting that the sabotage may be part of a larger proxy war.

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

THREAD🚨 #Nordstream "Last June, the Navy divers, operating under the cover of a widely publicized mid-summer NATO exercise known as BALTOPS 22, planted the remotely triggered explosives that..." https://seymourhersh.substack.com/p/how-america-took-out-the-nord-stream

How America Took Out The Nord Stream Pipeline The New York Times called it a “mystery,” but the United States executed a covert sea operation that was kept secret—until now seymourhersh.substack.com

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

2) BIDEN: “If Russia invades...then there will no longer be a Nord Stream 2. We will bring an end to it." REPORTER: "But how will you do that, exactly, since...the project is in Germany's control?" BIDEN: "I promise you, we will be able to do that." Feb. 7, 2022

Video Transcript AI Summary
If Russia invades Ukraine, Nord Stream 2 will be canceled. Germany will take action to halt the project. However, it is unclear how they will do this since Germany has control over the project.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me answer the first question first. If Germany if, if Russia invades, that means tanks or troops crossing the border of Ukraine again, then there will be, we there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2. We will bring it into Speaker 1: But how will you, how will you do that? Exactly. Since the project in control of the project is within Germany's controls?

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

3) Victoria Nuland: “If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward." Jan. 27, 2022

Video Transcript AI Summary
We are in ongoing discussions with Germany about Nord Stream 2. It is important to note that if Russia invades Ukraine, Nord Stream 2 will not proceed.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: With regard to Nord Stream 2, we continue to have, very strong and clear conversations, with our German allies, and I want to be clear with you today. If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward.

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

4) @TuckerCarlson: "If you were Vladimir Putin, you would have to be a suicidal moron to blow up your own energy pipelines. Natural gas pipelines are the main source of your power and your wealth and most critically your leverage over other countries. Europe needs your energy."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Vladimir Putin would never blow up his own energy pipelines as they are crucial for Russia's power and leverage over other countries. However, other countries, including the US, have suggested the possibility of sabotaging the Nord Stream pipelines. Joe Biden and Toria Nuland both hinted at stopping Nord Stream if Russia invades Ukraine. While it's hard to believe that the Biden administration would engage in such extreme actions, close allies like Radek Sikorski have thanked the US for the pipeline explosions. The White House has not denied responsibility and instead emphasizes the need for clean energy and reducing gas consumption. If the Biden administration is indeed responsible, it would be a destructive act consistent with their tendency to tear down rather than build.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Vladimir Putin, you would have to be a suicidal moron to blow up your own energy pipelines. That's the one thing you would never do. Natural gas pipelines are the main source of your power and your wealth and most critically, your leverage over other countries. Europe needs your energy, now more than ever with winter approaching. If you can't deliver that energy, then countries like Germany have no need to pay attention to what to want. You're in the middle of a war, an all hands on deck war, so you need all the leverage you can get. Under these circumstances, there is no chance you would blow up Nord Stream 1 or 2, not now, obviously. In fact, it's so obvious that even as our famously dim Terry of State Tony Blinken seemed to acknowledge it. Sabotaging Nord Stream, he said today, is clearly in no one's interest. Right. But really only half right. It is true that blowing up Nord Stream does not help Vladimir Putin. He would not do that. Why would he? But that doesn't mean that other countries wouldn't consider doing it. They would consider it, and we know they have considered it because at least one of them has said so in public. In early February, less than 3 weeks before the war in Ukraine began, Joe Biden suggested on camera that he might take out these pipelines. Watch. Speaker 1: If Russia invades, that means tanks or troops crossing the, the the border of Ukraine Again, then, there will be, we there will be no longer a Norristown too. We we will bring it into Speaker 2: Would you but how will you how will you do that exactly since the project in control of the project is within Germany's Speaker 1: We will, I promise you, we'll be able to do it. Speaker 0: Notice how he phrased that. And he's the president. Doesn't phrase things by accident, particularly when he's reading off cards. He didn't say, I will pause the delivery of gas from Russia to Germany. He said, there won't be a Nord Stream 2. We'll put an end to it. We'll take it out. We'll blow it up. How will you do this? He was asked. I promise you, we will be able to do it. They thought this through. And yet those watching, very much including us, didn't take Biden seriously when he said it. This is the president who has declared climate change the most pressing emergency in This is the man who lectures you about using a wood stove or driving an SUV because of its emissions. This is the guy who spent 1,000,000,000 trying to mitigate cow flatulence, because methane. Would that guy really blow up a methane pipeline in the middle of the Baltic Sea? It was hard to imagine. That would be an unimaginably reckless act. That'd be the kind of thing you would do if you wanted to start a nuclear war. It would be insane. And yet, in retrospect, it's obvious they were thinking about this because Joe Biden wasn't the only person to suggest it. Toria Nuland at the State Department said pretty much the same thing. Nuland is a lifelong war cheerleader. She worked to bring about the Iraq invasion, never apologized, kept going. She helped engineer the coup that overthrew the Ukrainian government, some years back. So capable. Clearly, she's capable of anything. But environmental terrorism? Even for Toria Nuland, that seemed too much, too extreme. And yet here she is in January. Speaker 3: With regard to Nord Stream 2, we continue to have, very strong and clear conversations, With our German allies, and I wanna be clear with you today. If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or Another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward. Speaker 0: One way or the other, We'll stop Nord Stream. Now looking back, those words seem chilling 8 months later as natural gas pours into the Baltic Sea and into the atmosphere. So you have to ask, could the Biden administration really do something like this? We can't say for sure. We don't know for sure. We can tell you that close Allies of the Biden White House believe they certainly did do it. Radek Sikorski is a Polish politician. He's chairman of the EU USA delegation in the European Parliament. He's connected. He's also the husband of regime stenographer Ann Applebaum of The Atlantic Magazine. Sikorsky is so close to Joe Biden that he's got a picture of the 2 of them together in his Twitter profile. So when the pipelines blew up, Sikorsky responded immediately. And here's what he wrote. Thank you, USA. So once again, did the Biden administration really do this? It's hard to believe. Given that it's an atrocity, It's effectively an act of terrorism. We don't wanna make that accusation. But we should tell you that, maybe not coincidentally, Today, a brand new pipeline was unveiled. The pipeline that carries non Russian natural gas in roughly the same area as Nord Stream's 1 and 2. This is called the Baltic Pipe. It was inaugurated in Poland. It will carry natural gas from Norway through Denmark to Poland and other countries nearby. And it's likely to do very well since now It has less competition. Making sense? What does the White House say about this? How are they accounting for what happened today? Well, they're not exactly enthusiastically denying responsibility for it. Instead, they're looking at the upside. Here's the president's publicist noting that the destruction of yet another Energy pipeline is yet another opportunity for you to buy an electric car. Speaker 2: As you all know, these pipelines weren't pumping gas into Europe At this time, NS 2 was never operational, as you guys know. NS 1 has not been operational for weeks because, Putin has weaponized, energy. And we have said this many times before. This just drives home the importance of our efforts to work together to get alternative gas Supplies to Europe and to support efforts to reduce gas consumption and accelerate true energy independence by moving to clean energy Economy. Speaker 0: Oh, moving to clean energy, say the people who very may well be responsible for letting methane into the Baltic Sea and into the atmosphere at a scale that most people can't imagine. The people lecturing you about your SUV may have blown up a natural gas pipeline and created one of the great catastrophes of our time and its effect on the environment. If they did this, this will be one of the craziest, most destructive things any American administration has ever done. But it would also be totally consistent with what they do. What do they do? They destroy. These people build nothing. Not one thing. Instead, they tear down and desecrate, from historic statues, to the Constitution, to energy infrastructure. And no one in Congress is trying to stop any of it. They're just preparing for the inevitable fallout.

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

5) The CIA warned authorities in Berlin three months before the Nordstream pipeline was sabotaged of the possibility that someone would destroy the pipelines. I wonder how they knew? https://www.reuters.com/world/cia-warned-berlin-about-possible-attacks-gas-pipelines-summer-spiegel-2022-09-27/

CIA warned Berlin about possible attacks on gas pipelines in summer - Spiegel The U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) had weeks ago warned Germany about possible attacks on gas pipelines in the Baltic Sea, German magazine Spiegel said on Tuesday, after gas leaks in Russia pipelines to Germany were reported. reuters.com

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

6) The people who told you Iraq has WMDs want you to believe Russia blew up its own pipeline. The US Government previously lied Americans into war using the Gulf of Tonkin, USS Maine, RMS Lusitania, Iraqi incubator babies, and WMDs. But trust them this time.

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

7) The gas pipelines were sabotaged near Bornholm in the Baltic Sea. The leaks occurred in areas where the pipelines lie at sufficiently shallow depths for divers to plant explosives.

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

8) The US Navy and NATO held a major maritime training exercise in the Baltic Sea involving scores of allied ships throughout the region. The event was held off the coast of Bornholm Island and involved teams of divers who happened to be planting and locating explosives.

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

9) The US Navy posted pictures of themselves planting "mock explosives" in the Baltic Sea where the pipelines would explode three months later. But don't worry, it was a "training exercise." https://www.navy.mil/Press-Office/News-Stories/Article/3060311/baltops-22-a-perfect-opportunity-for-research-and-testing-new-technology/

BALTOPS 22: A perfect opportunity for research and testing new technology BALTIC SEA - Exercise Baltic Operations (BALTOPS) 22, the premier maritime-focused exercise in the Baltic region, began June 5, 2022, in the Baltic Sea. With a significant focus of BALTOPS every year navy.mil

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

10) Uncle Joe, the climate change warrior, would never blow up a natural gas pipeline in the ocean, right? If Joe truly cared, his son Hunter wouldn't be invested in the world's worst polluting Chinese-government-owned oil, gas, and coal companies. https://kanekoa.substack.com/p/hunter-biden-invested-1-billion-into

Joe Crushes American Energy While Hunter Gets Rich From Chinese Fossil Fuels Joe Biden fights climate change in the United States, while his son's Chinese private equity fund holds investments in Chinese oil giant, Sinopec, which creates more CO2 emissions than all of Canada. kanekoa.substack.com

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

11) Prof. Jeffrey Sachs caused chaos on Bloomberg for suggesting the U.S. government was behind the Nord Stream sabotage. "The destruction of the Nord Stream pipeline which I would bet was a U.S. action..."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The decline in output and living standards has led to a rise in prices in the European economy. The sudden cutoff of energy and the destruction of the Nord Stream pipeline, which may have been a US and Poland action, have further impacted the situation. Radar evidence suggests that US military helicopters were circling the area, and there were previous threats from the United States to end Nord Stream. Secretary Blinken's statement about it being a tremendous opportunity raises questions. Despite being against the narrative in the West, many people worldwide believe the US is responsible. However, there is a lack of evidence and counterbalance in the media.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The sharp decline of output in living standards also shows up as a rise of prices. But the the main fact is that the European economy is getting hammered by this, by the sudden cutoff of energy. And now, to make it, definitive, the destruction of the the Nord Stream pipeline which I I would bet was a US action, perhaps US and and Poland. This is But, Jeff, we're gonna stop there. That's a that's Quite a statement as well. Why do you feel Absolutely. That that was a US action? What evidence do you have of that? Well, first of all, there's direct radar evidence that US, helicopters, military helicopters that are normally based in Gdansk, were, circling over this area. We also had the threats From the United States earlier in this year that one way or another, we are going to end Nord Stream. We also have a remarkable statement by secretary Blinken last Friday in a press conference that he says, This is also a tremendous opportunity. It's a strange way to it's sorry. It's a strange way to talk if you're worried about the piracy on international infrastructure vital significance. So I know this runs counter to our narrative. It runs you're not allowed to say these things, in in, in the west. But the fact of the matter is All over the world, when I talk to people, they think the US did it. So that's not And and by by the way, even reporters on our Papers that are involved, tell me privately, yeah, well, of course, but it doesn't show up in our our media. Professor, I'm gonna wanna get into a different pat about what Did or did not happen with Nord Stream? Because I don't have the evidence, and we don't have a a counterbalance to this. There is an issue though that's at the

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

12) @JoeRogan and @ComicDaveSmith break down the reasons Russia invaded Ukraine: "The most important priority in the history of humanity is that America and Russia do not go to war."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses concern about the escalating tensions between the US and Russia, emphasizing the importance of avoiding a nuclear conflict. They mention reports that the US discouraged Ukraine from negotiating with Russia at the beginning of the war, despite having a potential deal in place. The speaker criticizes the official narrative that portrays Vladimir Putin as a madman and a threat to Europe, while also downplaying his nuclear threats. They draw parallels to the misrepresentation of Osama bin Laden's motivations and argue for listening to the enemy's perspective. The speaker acknowledges that Putin was wrong to invade Ukraine but argues that there was provocation. They highlight the broken promise of NATO not expanding eastward and the current presence of NATO forces on Russia's border.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This thing with Russia is just like the craziest thing in the world. Like, the idea that we're actually flirting with a nuclear conflict with Russia is the most important priority in the history of humanity, is that America and Russia do not go to war. There's nothing more important than that. That's that's it. We'll destroy the the human species if we do this. And yet, there's this war right on Russia's border and there's no effort to negotiate going on. There's, like, no effort. In fact, from from very, solid reporting that actually, America through Boris Johnson in in it, told Ukraine not to negotiate with Russia at the very beginning of the war, when they had a deal worked out. They had a they had a deal worked out. It's been reported in multiple sources that they had a deal worked out. And the deal was basically that Vladimir Putin would pull back, he would pull back his troops and leave Ukraine under the condition that the very simple conditions that Ukraine, guaranteed, autonomy for the Donbas region and agreed to never join NATO. And, like, that was a deal. Like, okay. I'm not saying everyone thinks that's the perfect deal, but it's better than what we got right now. Better than nuclear war. And right now, just the other day, dude, the official narrative on this this whole war, it's just like it makes no sense. And, again, like I said, remember, the same people who are pushing this are the ones who are telling you Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and stuff. But The official narrative, Joe, is basically that, okay, so, Vladimir Putin is a madman, a crazy war criminal who's hell bent on, reforming the Soviet Union and this is a real threat that he could do this, but also he's he's getting humiliated in this war in Ukraine. So, like, he's he's losing the poorest country in Europe and he's just getting humiliated and beat back, but he's still a real threat to take over all of Europe. And he's a complete madman, by the way, Joe. But when he says he's gonna use nuclear weapons, don't listen to that. He'd never actually do that even though he's a complete madman. And as everyone says, this this war, the word they use over and over and over again, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton, all of them, unprovoked. Vladimir Putin led an unprovoked war in Ukraine. But then, it's just like with Osama Bin Laden, what they did with him then. Don't listen to him. Whatever you do, don't listen to what he's actually saying, because none of that's his motivations. Like, what his motivations are, what we tell you. Osama bin Laden hates us, because we're free. And then, like, Ron Paul would just go, like, yeah. But that's not what he's saying at all. Like, oh, he, Osama bin Laden was so clear about why he hated America. I mean, he's like look, I hate you because you murder innocent civilians in the Muslim world, you prop up brutal dictators in the Muslim world, you prop up Israel who mistreats the Palestinian people, and you have our your, your bases in our holy land in the Arabian Peninsula. Then they're, like, nah, he hates us because we're free. Like, he didn't mention anything about freedom there. And then if you say that, they're, like, well, are you defending Osama Bin Laden? And, like, no. I'm just saying listen to your enemies. There's a reason why he hates us. And if you listen to Vladimir Putin and what he's saying I mean, look, he's wrong for invading, Ukraine. And, I mean, you know me, Joe. I'm the most anti war fuck fucking person there is, and there's no excuse for that. Like, tens of thousands of people have died. It's horrible. And a lot of them are soldiers, but a lot of them are civilians and, but to say he was unprovoked is, like, insane. It's just only people who know nothing about the history of this conflict would say there was no provocation. Did you see the conversation that Roger Waters had with that CNN guy? She had. Right? Because Roger Waters was awesome on that. Yeah. Because he knows what he's talking about, dude. And he he's right about all of that shit. He's look, the the promise, and this is what he was saying, he's absolutely right, that the promise when the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991 and this was, like verbally promised and put in writing, was that NATO would not expand 1 inch to the East and NATO at that point. The line then was through Germany. Right? Like, the the the western half of Germany was in the West and the eastern half was with the Soviet Union and they were, like, we'll let all of these nations, you know, secede and the Soviet Union will collapse and we're giving up on communism, so one of the greatest things that ever happened and the deal was, okay, you do that, then we won't move NATO. We won't move our military alliance into your area that used to be your realm of influence. And every single president since then has moved NATO East to the point that NATO is now on Russia's border. And in Ukraine, even though they didn't officially join NATO, there was always talk of it, Kamala Harris, very right before the start of the war, said we're looking to put Ukraine into NATO and the, the, you know, they put under George W Bush, they put in, in Poland these dual use rocket launchers, there's a big complaint that Vladimir Putin has, that he's like these can be used to get nukes here in a matter of minutes, like this is a this is like a threat to us that we cannot tolerate.

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

13) @JoeRogan and @ComicDaveSmith break down the Obama admin overthrowing Ukraine's government: "All these Soros-funded NGOs funded the militias on the ground... There's a tape of Victoria Nuland talking about who would be the new government... We overthrew their government."

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2014, there was a coup in Ukraine led by the West. The goal was to attract Ukraine to the West and away from Russia. The Ukrainian government was pro-Russia, but the West wanted a pro-America government. George Soros-funded NGOs supported the militias that overthrew the government. The US State Department was involved in choosing the new government. Ukraine's importance to Putin was a red line. The impeachment of the previous US president and the involvement of the current president's son in Ukraine are connected to this conflict. Burisma, a company linked to the old pro-Russia government, bribed Joe Biden's son. Trump wanted Ukraine to investigate this. Obama didn't send weapons to Ukraine, but Trump did. This context led to Putin invading Ukraine.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Then in 2014, there was a coup in Ukraine that was completely led by the West. And there's I I don't know if you've ever heard, but, like, like, I think I sent you actually once the, the tape of Gideon Rose, who was the editor for Foreign Fairs Magazine on the old Stephen Colbert Report, show, back when Colbert was hilarious. And he was just openly bragging about what the game is here. And then he was like, well, Ukraine is kinda like the Robin to Russia's Batman. And so our job is to steal Robin away from Batman And make him come over here and join us. And, Vladimir Putin's so stupid that he won't do anything. And then Colbert's in his old character. So he's like, well, shouldn't Obama be spiking the football and saying, yeah, in your face, Putin. And Gideon Rose is like, well, no, no, because then Putin might invade Ukraine. So we wouldn't wanna spike the ball, But they there there's these oh, yeah. Here it is. Let's play it. Let's play it. Go from the beginning. Yeah. Play it from the beginning. There Speaker 1: there's the magazine, Foreign Affairs. Now now now now, Gideon, help me out here. We've got a we've got a battle. The Ukraine, some of them wanna go into the EU, the European Union Right. And some of them wanna stay with Russia. If the Ukraine's not in Europe right now, what continent is it on? Speaker 2: Well, it's part of Eurasia, but it's part of Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Bloc. Uh-huh. It's basically Robin to Russia's Batman. And the challenge here the challenge here is to try to attract it to the West to get it to flip sides. Speaker 1: So the the rebels in the streets, what are they fighting for? Speaker 2: They're fighting for a better future. Countries have a developed That Speaker 1: sounds like a political So Speaker 2: but it's actually Countries have to develop over time. And Ukraine, basically, after it the end of the Soviet Union faced two tracks. It could stay as sort of stagnant, Corrupt, authoritarian country tied to Russia, or it could essentially join the West. It could modernize, liberalize, become a democracy. At the last minute, when it looked like it was gonna trade up from its sort of, abusive relationship with its boyfriend from the hood to a a nice Guppy, Speaker 1: You're not loading these choices anyway whatsoever. Speaker 2: It's actually true. When it looked like it was gonna trade up to a better, environment, at the last minute, Putin offered a bribe. Speaker 1: How much? Speaker 2: 15,000,000,000. That's Speaker 1: a lot of cash. Speaker 2: It's a lot of cash. And the president, who himself was tied to the old elites And the eastern part of the country ties to Russia decided to back off the change and go for Russia. Speaker 1: Pirate themed restaurants you can buy with $15,000,000,000? Speaker 2: The problem was the western parts of the country and the younger parts of the country and the more modern liberal parts of the country basically knew that they had no future being Russia's Russia's vassal. Do Do we they took to the streets. Speaker 1: Is America taking sides in this in any way? If if these people the the rebels are winning them right now, right? Speaker 2: Yes. Just recently. Speaker 1: Why isn't Obama spiking the ball in the end zone and calling Putin and saying, hey. You might have won the medal count, but we won the country count, biatch. It's Speaker 2: actually a very good question. And the answer is that we don't want Russia to intervene and kick over the table like a gamer risk And take Ukraine back. Speaker 0: And so Speaker 1: Will they do that? Could he send in troops? Yes. Speaker 2: He could. So we are choosing Does Speaker 1: Ukraine have any troops of their own? Would they fight back? Speaker 2: Yes. But we don't want this to Escalate, and we don't want Russia to crack down. So we wanna basically distract Russia. Oh, look, you have the highest medal count. Oh, you did really well. And that's possible. The Olympics. Speaker 1: There's a shiny object. I'll just take an entire country away from you. Speaker 2: Holy shit. Speaker 1: Now Isn't Speaker 0: that funny? Speaker 1: There's a power vacuum right now. Speaker 2: There's a power vacuum. The opposition is all together, which everybody it's it's easy to agree on getting rid of the bad old regime and much harder To create a stable country in which everybody compromises and moves forward. So Speaker 1: They need a strong leader to move the country forward. Do you know who's always good Speaker 3: at a moment like that? Vladimir Putin. Speaker 1: Do you think he might volunteer to come in and and and help Ukraine Speaker 2: find We don't want we don't want we don't want Putin to get involved in this, and so we are basically we wanna try and involve him in this decision so that he allows Ukraine to go. We actually wanna not We wanna say we want a nonexclusive relationship with Ukraine. You can have a relationship with it too. Speaker 1: You're the only one making this into a girlfriend, boyfriend relationship. Speaker 2: Ukraine is basically Choosing its future between 2 completely different courses of action, and we're trying to blur that choice so the old boyfriend doesn't get too upset when it has the right choice. Speaker 0: So so it's just all these George Soros funded NGOs were funding the the militias on the ground who were overthrowing the the government. And then there's a tape of Victoria Nuland, who's who's, was at the state department at the time, one of the top people at the state department. And she was basically talking about who would be the new government that took over who America didn't want in, who we did want in the new government. So it's not you know, what happened basically was as Gideon Rose was even saying, the Ukrainian government was kind of siding with Russia, or at least a lot more pro Russia, and then we overthrew that government and installed the pro America pro government. And this to Putin, he had said over and over again, was a huge red line for him. Like, Ukraine was the big line. And you could look, Imagine take it from our point of view, if, like, Russia was coming over here and overthrowing the pro America government in Montreal and installing a pro Russia government there. Speaker 2: Right. Speaker 0: Then, you know, like, this would be seen as would you call that an unprovoked attack? Right. You know, if we were to go in there and then go overthrow that government so, again, I'm not justifying what he's doing. But and then the other thing to this, right, That's important to add is, like, you remember the 2 big things that it's so weird no one, like, at least in the in the larger conversation, I don't see anyone connecting these things, is that there's 2 things like involving Ukraine that they were very big, that happened very recently in American history that very much connect to this war. And one is that Our last president was impeached over a thing with Ukraine and like what was that? And then the other thing is, the current president's son was getting paid 1,000,000 of dollars from a company, Burisma, in Ukraine and these things all connect. Basically, what happened was after the 2014 coup. This company, Burisma, they were and by the way, Matt Taibbi has done incredible reporting on this. I highly recommend everyone read his of, his subsects. Incredible. Fantastic. Unbelievable. But so, basically, Burisma was in bed with the old government that had allied with Russia. And so when this government was overthrown, they were very worried because they were like, oh, we were in bed with the old government and now there's this new government who's in there. And so instead of bribing the new government, they just went right to the source and bribed The son of the sitting vice president, bro, Joe Biden, when he was vice president, was in charge of Ukraine policy. Oh my god. So they just went that was why they put him there. Way. And then they put some other, like, CIA guy or something like that on their board. They're just paying them money to just be, like, hey, keep us in with you. And then Trump was telling them to investigate all of this shit. He got on the phone with them and was like, I want to investigate everything that was going on with Joe and Hunter Biden in Ukraine. And Donald Trump did. He got into an area that it was there's an argument it was not okay what he was doing, because he was kinda going like, Maybe you don't get this these, these weapons that I was gonna send in unless you go investigate them and this was his political opponent, so it was a little bit of a shady thing. But then the other story about that is that ultimately, Trump caved and he sent in the weapons to Ukraine. So now, not only did Obama Overthrow the regime when Joe Biden was the point man. Joe Biden was running Ukraine policy. Obama leads this coup, overthrows that government and puts in a pro Western government, then Trump comes in, sends in a whole bunch of weapons to this new government that Obama wouldn't even send in because he was concerned it would provoke, Russia. And then the next president is Joe Biden, the last guy who was the point man on Ukraine, who who was there when this coup happened, then he comes back in. This is all like the context that led to Vladimir Putin invading Ukraine.

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

14) The Obama administration overthrew Ukraine's elected government in 2014. John McCain rallied protestors, and Victoria Nuland was caught on tape planning Ukraine's new government. What role did this have on the current NATO proxy war in Ukraine?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the presence of a guest from the United States who frequently visited and supported protests in Ukraine. They express concern about the excessive use of force by the authorities during these protests. The speaker questions the appropriateness of supporting the protesters and creating conflict when they occupy government buildings. They also mention their contact with Vice President Biden and criticize the inconsistency between his words and actions in Ukraine. The speaker suggests that the US ambassador in Ukraine regularly met with representatives of the protests, giving the impression that there was a headquarters managing the process.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Очень час гостями были штатов, кадры смены были госпожа Ну, проезжал очень часто у нас были ней дискуссии, Но после этих дискуссии она шла на Май дан и поддерживала протест. И об право органы прим чрезмерно сила. На самом деле эти все мыс мы видели на Май дань Делегация много проезжал я, что нельзя нельзя говорить, во-первых, неправ. Нельзя становиться на сторону митинг и отстаивать их права, создавая тем самым и углу конфликт. Когда митинг захватывает правительство здание учреждения скажите Допустимо ли это в любой другой стране, например, чтобы посол Украины пришел к митинг фермер и раз там пряники или пирожки и обмен полицейских Соединенных Штатов Америки. Я считаю, что это недопустимо ни в одной европейской стране. А почему к украине было такое отношение Я постоянно имел контакт с вод байден, ви президентом. У меня были частые с ним телефоны п. Но дело в том, что господин Байден говорил одно, а в Украине делали другое. Посол Соединенных Штатов в Украине постоянно принимал представителей май, у себя в посол мы это очень хорошо знали, мы это от и создавал создавалась такое впечатление, что в посол Соединенных штатов существует штаб, который управляет этим процессом.

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

15) After the U.S. overthrew Ukraine's government in 2014, 96% of Luhansk and 89% of Donetsk voted to secede from Ukraine. The west said the elections were illegitimate. But the eastern half of Ukraine typically votes for pro-Russia candidates. Blue = Pro-Russia Red = Pro-West

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

16) If the military-industrial complex sabotaged Nordstream, it would be one of the craziest, most destructive terrorist acts any American administration has ever done. Blowing up a gas pipeline to Europe during an energy crisis and escalating a war with nuclear-armed Russia.

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

17) @Jimmy_Dore: "Your enemy is not China, your enemy is not Russia, your enemy is the Military Industrial Complex..." The bottom line is there will be no world left for our children if this war between nuclear superpowers continues to escalate.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the United States for provoking and threatening nuclear powers, claiming that Americans are unaware of their own foreign policy. They argue that the military-industrial complex benefits from these actions, while the American people suffer from job losses and corruption. The speaker highlights the excessive military budget and the numerous military bases surrounding China. They assert that China is not an enemy, but rather the military-industrial complex is the true adversary. The speaker also mentions the conflicts in Ukraine and Syria, attributing them to economic interests and imperialism. They conclude by emphasizing the need to recognize the true motives behind these actions.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Think it means is that the United States is trying to provoke and sable Ratter with another nuclear power. Right? This is what we were supposed to be afraid of what's gonna happen with Donald Trump. Right? We couldn't have, he's a crazy man who's gonna have his finger on the nuclear button, and now we have Dementia Joe who is saber rattling with 2 nuclear powers, and they get the corporate media sponsored by the military industrial complex to get Americans to cheer it on. And why do Americans cheer it on? Because they have no idea what's actually happening with their foreign policy. And what's worse is they have no idea that they have no idea with that. They don't have any idea what's happening with their foreign policy. We have 400 military bases surrounding China since the Korean War. Do we really think that China is getting ready to invade the United States because I tell you they're not. They make everything we use in the United States. Why? Because the same people who want this war are the same people who took the good jobs that are manufacturing jobs in America, turned them into low paying crappy jobs, and then shipped them to China, and then we get angry at them for the system that we set up if they're so corrupt. Because that's the thing, Americans have no idea how corrupt their government is. They think our government's just regular corrupt, like, oh, Trump gave his son a job or Biden gave his kid a no pa a no show job in the Ukraine war. That's not the whole thing is corrupt. The $800,000,000,000 military budget is $800,000,000,000 of corruption. Why do we have to have 8, 8, 900 military bases around. We're the ones provoking this war. Just like we provoked the war in Ukraine, we are now provoking a war with China. And what who who benefits? I'll tell you right now. Your enemy is not China. Your enemy is not Russia. Your enemy is the military industrial complex, which has been fleecing this country to the tunes of 100 of 1,000,000,000 and 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars. How many times are we gonna have a defense secretary say, hey, we can't account for $2,000,000,000,000 in the Pentagon again. That like, which has happened twice now in my lifetime. So, again, people are being, the the war machine cannot be stopped. Who's running this country? The war machine. It certainly isn't Joe Biden making these decisions. I would like to know who is making the decisions, and I just wanna remind everybody, the United States is the world's terrorist. We just set the Middle East on fire in the last 20 years, and now we're doing a proxy war in Ukraine, which we provoked, NATO provoked, and was just admitted that we provoked it by the former prime minister of Germany, and now we're trying to sable rather with with China, and they're predicting a war. Again, China's not gonna invade us. China's not our enemy. Then we might have an economic war. That's what these are. These are economic wars. These are wars for in Ukraine, it's about liquefied natural gas and making sure Germany and Russia never come together because we fear Russia's, natural resources and manpower, and we fear them getting together with Germany with their technology and their capital, and so that's why we blew up the Nord Stream pipeline. That's why we're doing the Ukraine war. This is all about hegemony, imperialism, and economics. And if there's a marine somewhere, it's there because they're about to steal some natural resources from another country. As everybody's screaming about what a bad guy hide Putin as for invading Ukraine. The United States is currently occupying a third of Syria. And which third is that? It's the third that has the oil. And how do I know we're there to steal their oil? Because the president of the United States said so. And we're not we're not even benefiting economically. That's, I mean, of course, that's the rub. Jimmy Dore, appreciate it. Thank you.

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

18) Did you know that only 10% of my posts make it to your home page feed? If you appreciate my work — and don't want to miss anything, please consider hitting the bell on my profile page. 🙏♥️🌎 @KanekoaTheGreat

CollinRugg
Posted - February 10, 2023 at 2:58 AM
Saved - February 10, 2023 at 11:35 PM

@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg

Biden blew up the Nord Stream pipeline which led to the leak of 400,000 TONS of gas and the climate crew has nothing to say? They don't care about the climate. They care about controlling you.

@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg

Investigative Journalist Says U.S. Bombed Nord Stream Pipeline https://trendingpoliticsnews.com/breaking-investigative-journalist-says-u-s-bombed-nord-stream-pipeline-mace/?utm_source=collin&utm_medium=twitter

BREAKING: Investigative Journalist Says U.S. Bombed Nord Stream Pipeline A report claims that President Joe Biden oversaw a top secret mission in which specialized U.S. Navy diving teams bombed the underwater Nord Stream pipelines trendingpoliticsnews.com
ricwe123
Posted - February 13, 2023 at 11:55 AM
Saved - December 15, 2023 at 10:20 PM

@ricwe123 - Richard

How the US organized the coup in Ukraine in 2014 . Victoria Nuland and Geoffrey Pyatt in full swing..... pt.1 https://t.co/K9hc0KNg2C

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the role of Klitschko in the government and the need to keep the moderate Democrats united. Speaker 0 believes Klitschko should not join the government, while Speaker 1 agrees and suggests that Klitschko should focus on his political work outside the government. They also mention the importance of Yatsenyuk, who has the necessary experience, and suggest regular communication with him and Tony Book. Speaker 0 suggests setting up a call with Klitschko, but Speaker 1 believes Klitschko may take time to join the meeting with the others. They agree that reaching out to Klitschko directly would help manage the dynamics and allow for faster progress.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What do you think? Speaker 1: I think we're in play. The The Klitschko piece is obviously the complicated electron here, especially the announcement of him as deputy prime minister. And you've seen some of my notes on the troubles in the marriage right now. So we're trying to get a read really fast on where he is on this stuff. But I think your argument to him, which you'll need to make, I think that's next phone call we want to set up is exactly the one you made to Yachts. And I'm glad you sort of put him on the spot on where he fits in this scenario. And I'm very glad he said what he said in response. Speaker 0: Good. So, I don't think CLEACH should go into the government. I don't think it's necessary. I don't think it's a good idea. Speaker 1: Yes. I mean, I guess You think in terms of him not going into the government, just let him sort of stay out and do his political homework and stuff. I'm just thinking In terms of sort of the process moving ahead, we want to keep the moderate Democrats together. The problem is going to be tiny book and his guys. And I'm sure that's part of what Yanekovich is calculating on all of this. Speaker 0: I think Yats is the guy who's got the economic experience, the governing experience. He's he's the guy you know, what he needs is cleech and the Tony Book on the outside, he needs to be talking to them 4 times a week. You know? I I I just think Klitsch going in, he's gonna be at that level Working for Yatsenyuk, it's just not gonna work. Speaker 1: Yeah. No. I think that's I think that's right. Okay. Good. Well, do you want us to try to set up a call with him as the next step? Speaker 0: My understanding from that call, but you tell me was that the big three were going into their own meeting and that Yachts was gonna offer in that context The Three way you know, the 3 plus 1 conversation or 3 plus 2 with you. Is that not how you understood it? Speaker 1: No. I think I mean, that's what he proposed. But I think just knowing the dynamic that's been with them where Klitschko has been the top dog, he's going to take a while to show up for whatever meeting they've got. He's probably talking to his guys at this point. So I think you reaching out directly to him helps with the personality management among the 3 and it gives you also a chance to move fast
foxblog3
Posted - February 20, 2023 at 11:05 AM
Saved - December 2, 2024 at 6:58 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I posted about Biden's visit to Kyiv, highlighting the backdrop of the Nord Stream pipeline incidents. I reflected on whether he would address the alleged terrorist attack during his meeting with Zelensky. The narrative suggests a connection between Biden and the Nord Stream events, with some questioning the U.S. administration's involvement. There’s a sense of urgency in discussing these revelations, alongside concerns about broader economic issues. The tone of the posts conveys skepticism about the motivations behind these political actions.

@foxblog3 - thefoxblog

1. Biden in Kyiv after taking out Nordstream https://williambowles.info/2023/02/19/reporter-seymour-hersh-on-how-america-took-out-the-nord-stream-pipeline-exclusive-tv-interview/ #kiev #kyiv

Reporter Seymour Hersh on “How America Took Out the Nord Stream Pipeline”: Exclusive TV Interview Wednesday, 15 February 2023 -- Democracy Now UPDATE: We have blurred some imagery about 30 seconds into the video in response to a content warning from YouTube that severely limited the reach of this interview. What you see now is an edited version. For the uncensored version of this interview that aired on our show,… williambowles.info

@foxblog3 - thefoxblog

2. Fresh from his victory over $12 balloons Biden visits kyiv https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11760443/Did-Joe-Biden-shoot-hobbyists-12-balloon-380-000-missile.html #kiev #kyiv

Did Joe Biden shoot down hobbyists $12 balloon with $380,000 missile? A mystery object shot down by U.S. fighter jets amid ongoing hysteria sparked by a Chinese 'spy' balloon may have been a $12 inflatable launched by a hobby group in Illinois. dailymail.co.uk

@foxblog3 - thefoxblog

3. Wonder if Biden will be discussing Nordstream terrorist attack with Zelensky in kyiv ? https://www.eugyppius.com/p/nord-stream-update-in-lengthy-interview #Kiev #kyiv #nordstream

NORD STREAM UPDATE: In lengthy interview with the Berliner Zeitung, Seymour Hersh offers more intriguing details about his source's account of the attack It’s been a week since Seymour Hersh released his Substack exclusive about How America Took Out The Nord Stream Pipeline. The mainstream German press have responded with uniform scepticism. Most reports followed the example of the wire services, in leading with the blanket denials of American officials and noting that the story was well-received in Moscow eugyppius.com

@foxblog3 - thefoxblog

4. Nordstream terror attack. The plot thickens. Biden and Zelensky in Kyiv thesaker.is/nord-stream-te… #kiev #kyiv #nordstream #zelensky #biden

@foxblog3 - thefoxblog

5. PEPE ESCOBAR: Attacks on Author of Nord Stream 2 Revelations . Biden guilty in Kyiv https://odysee.com/@richardmedhurst:3/pepe-escobar-attacks-on-author-of-nord:0 #kiev #kyiv #nordstream #zelensky #biden

PEPE ESCOBAR: Attacks on Author of Nord Stream 2 Revelations Support the show on Patreon: https://patreon.com/richardmedhurst odysee.com

@foxblog3 - thefoxblog

6. Is the U.S. Biden Administration Behind the Blowing Up of the Nord Stream 1 and 2 Pipelines Between Russia and Western Europe? https://conspiracyanalyst.org/2023/02/18/is-the-u-s-biden-administration-behind-the-blowing-up-of-the-nord-stream-1-and-2-pipelines-between-russia-and-western-europe/ Terrorist Biden in Kyiv #kiev #kyiv #nordstream #zelensky #biden

Is the U.S. Biden Administration Behind the Blowing Up of the Nord Stream 1 and 2 Pipelines Between Russia and Western Europe? Global Research By Prof Rodrigue Tremblay   [NATO’s goal is] “to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down.” Lord Ismay, first NATO Secretary-General (1952-1957). “Near-term-thinking [by political and business decision-makers] is not only deeply irresponsible—it is immoral.” Antonio Guterres, Secretary-General of the United Nations, (in a speech to the General Assembly, Monday… conspiracyanalyst.org

@foxblog3 - thefoxblog

7. How America Took Out The Nord Stream Pipeline Biden guilty . Now meets Zelensky in Kiev Kyiv https://cynthiachung.substack.com/p/how-america-took-out-the-nord-stream #kiev #kyiv #nordstream #zelensky #biden

Through A Glass Darkly | Cynthia Chung | Substack On matters of geopolitics, counterintelligence, revisionist history and cultural warfare. Click to read Through A Glass Darkly, by Cynthia Chung, a Substack publication with tens of thousands of subscribers. cynthiachung.substack.com

@foxblog3 - thefoxblog

8. Bidens mates at google censor the Biden terrorist attack on nordstream, just before he goes to Kyiv to meet mass sacrificer of Ukrainians, Zelensky https://stuartbramhall.substack.com/p/youtube-bans-expose-on-us-bombing #kiev #kyiv #nordstream #zelensky #biden

Youtube Bans Expose on US Bombing of Nordstream Pipeline The Unz Review stuartbramhall.substack.com

@foxblog3 - thefoxblog

9. Biden in Kyiv, trying to ignore Nodstream terrorist revelations... https://williambowles.info/2023/02/19/reporter-seymour-hersh-on-how-america-took-out-the-nord-stream-pipeline-exclusive-tv-interview/ #kiev #kyiv #nordstream #zelensky #biden

Reporter Seymour Hersh on “How America Took Out the Nord Stream Pipeline”: Exclusive TV Interview Wednesday, 15 February 2023 -- Democracy Now UPDATE: We have blurred some imagery about 30 seconds into the video in response to a content warning from YouTube that severely limited the reach of this interview. What you see now is an edited version. For the uncensored version of this interview that aired on our show,… williambowles.info

@foxblog3 - thefoxblog

10. Whilst terrrorists meet in Kyiv dont forget the economic collapse https://www.theorganicprepper.com/global-economic-collapse/ #kiev #kyiv #nordstream #zelensky #biden

Don't Let Balloons Distract You from the Economic Collapse Don't let Chinese spy balloons and mysterious aircraft distract you from the global economic collapse. Here what you may have missed. theorganicprepper.com

@foxblog3 - thefoxblog

@rattibha

Kambeitz9
Posted - March 28, 2023 at 9:50 AM
Saved - May 9, 2024 at 11:54 AM

@Kambeitz9 - Tony Kambeitz

In 2014, then U.S. State Department Spokesperson Jen Psaki was Asked about Victoria Nuland's Leaked Phone Call, in Which she Discusses the U.S. Plan to Install a Government in Ukraine. Nuland’s Leaked Phone Call is After Jen Psaki’s BS. https://t.co/RvMqJczOnY

Video Transcript AI Summary
US officials are involved in discussions regarding Ukraine, with plans to broker a future government. Private diplomatic conversations are common, including talks about UN involvement. There is a disagreement over public versus private statements on US involvement in Ukraine. Additionally, there are discussions about the roles of key political figures like Klitschko in the government. The focus is on maintaining unity among moderate Democrats and strategizing for the future. Plans for further conversations and meetings are being considered.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: US officials talk about issues around the world the world. Of course, we do. That's what you do. That's what diplomats do and discuss, especially, issues where we've been closely engaged. You know, the secretary met with the opposition this weekend. He stopped by a meeting with the foreign minister. It's up to the people of Ukraine, including officials from both sides, to determine the path forward, but it shouldn't be a surprise that there are discussions about events on the ground. Speaker 1: More than discussions, though. This was 2 top US officials Speaker 0: that are on the ground discussing a plan that they have to broker a future government and bringing officials from the UN to kind of seal the deal. This is more than the US trying to, make suggestions. This is the US midwifing the process. Well, Elise, you're talking about a private diplomatic conversation. Those happen all the time. Of course, as part of private diplomatic conversations, there are discussions about what involvement the UN can have, what involvement or engagement should happen on the ground. That shouldn't be a surprise. Of course, these things are being discussed. Speaker 2: I don't think that it is honest for you to say, no. We don't have an opinion, and that's all completely up to the people in Speaker 0: the US. There's a Speaker 2: And I specifically mean, in this case, I'm talking about Egypt. Speaker 0: Sure. Well, let me Speaker 2: just Because you do have it Speaker 3: in here. Speaker 0: One comment here. There is a difference between private discussions that happen in the interagency process, in the building, and what we convey publicly as a US government. And we have a responsibility to convey what our position is. Of course, you're discussing a range of options on a range of issues. But if you That's what you do as as a I'm sorry. Diplomat. Speaker 1: If you're saying privately behind the scenes that you're cooking up a deal and then you're saying publicly that this is up for Ukrainians to decide, those are 2 totally different things. I understand that diplomatic discussions are sensitive and you don't want everything to come out but those are 2 totally different, totally different positions. Elise, what do Speaker 0: you think happens behind closed doors when people are discussing issues internally through the interagency? Speaker 1: Discussing issues. This is talking about a deal that the US was was cooking up. Speaker 0: I I think I would disagree with you. I think you're overstating and overqualifying a a couple of minutes from a privately recorded phone. Speaker 3: What do you think? Speaker 4: I think we're in play. The Klitschko piece is obviously the complicated electron here, especially the announcement of him as Deputy Prime Minister. And you've seen some of my notes on the troubles in the marriage right now. So we're trying to get a read really fast on where he is on this stuff. But I think your argument to him, which you'll need to make, I think that's the next phone call we want to set up, is exactly the one you made to Yachts. And I'm glad you sort of put him on the spot on where he fits in this scenario. And I'm very glad he said what he said in response. Speaker 3: Good. So, I don't think cleats should go into the government. I don't think it's necessary. I don't think it's a Speaker 4: good idea. Yes. I mean, I guess you think in terms of him not going into the government, just let him sort of stay out and do his political homework and stuff. I'm just thinking in terms of sort of the process moving ahead, we want to keep the moderate Democrats together. The problem is going to be tiny book and his guys. And I'm sure that's part of what Yanukovych is calculating on all of this. Speaker 3: I think Yac is the guy who's got the economic experience, the governing experience. He's he's the guy you know, what he needs is cleech and tiny book on the outside. He needs to be talking to them 4 times a week. You know? I I I just think Klitsch going in, he's gonna be at that level working for Yacineuk. It's just not going to work. Speaker 4: Yes. No. I think that's I think that's right. Okay. Good. Would you want us to try to set up a call with him as the next step? Speaker 3: My understanding from that call, but you tell me was that the big three were going into their own meeting and that Yabs was gonna offer in that context a 3 way you know, 3 plus 1 conversation or 3+2 with
DC_Draino
Posted - June 6, 2023 at 7:22 PM
Saved - June 6, 2023 at 7:42 PM

@DC_Draino - DC_Draino

Biden: “I will destroy Nordstream 2” Nordstream 2: *gets blown up* DailyMail: “we have exclusive report showing Biden blew up Nordstream” People: Pretty sure Biden blew up Nordstream Media: “Ukraine blew up Nordstream” https://t.co/TNPBvHeAla

Video Transcript AI Summary
If Russia invades Ukraine, Nord Stream 2 will be canceled. However, it is unclear how this will be achieved as Germany currently controls the project. Nonetheless, the speaker assures that they will find a way to make it happen.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If Russia invades, that means tanks or troops crossing the, the the border of Ukraine again, then there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2. We will bring it into But how will you how will you do that exactly since the project And control of the project is within Germany's control? We will, I promise you, we'll be able to do
ValuetainmentTV
Posted - July 20, 2023 at 9:03 PM
Saved - August 29, 2023 at 7:23 AM

@ValuetainmentTV - Valuetainment Media

BREAKING: Footage obtained by Valuetainment captures General Stan McChrystal (Ret.) confirming neither Russia or Ukraine blew up the Nord Stream pipeline. "United States made more money off that deal than anybody else."

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is no clear solution in Russia and Putin's departure seems necessary, but there are no prominent alternatives. Radical individuals are gaining attention, which is concerning. Regarding the Russian interference, some believe Russia was responsible, while others, like my son who works in the energy sector, think otherwise. Although some benefited from the situation, such as natural gas producers worldwide, the United States made the most profit. We have evidence to support this claim. As a result, our policy shifted towards exporting liquid natural gas overseas.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's no obvious better solution in Russia. I think Putin ought to go, but there there's nobody that I'm aware of standing on the the wings. You seem like there's a lot more radical people staying on the wings, which is concerned. Like, remember the horn, the word string thing, like, in the beginning of that, I was like, oh, yeah. Russia did it, but there. Do you think what do you think of that? My son, Mosaic, is the leader of the energy team at TIA. Them. He didn't think the Russians did it, defense intelligence. He didn't think that the Ukrainians officially did it either. Them. I mean, there there are people who benefited from it, and that was people who produced natural gas around the world. So if we really wanna get conspiracy, there. The United States made more money off that deal than anybody else. I have proof. But yeah. But that's you know, because we were huge beneficiaries, we changed our policy. We started by the liquid natural gas, you know, overseas and, you know
MikeBenzCyber
Posted - September 11, 2023 at 8:01 PM
Saved - September 12, 2023 at 12:29 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Anne Applebaum's involvement with the notorious CIA cutout raises questions about her credibility. She was also exposed as a member of a covert British intelligence operation, the Integrity Initiative, focused on censorship and political warfare. These secret cluster cells recruited influential figures across various sectors. Applebaum's role in creating organized online influence campaigns is evident. Her connection to the UK cluster and the mysterious blow-up of the Nordstream pipeline, which aligned with her goals, raises further suspicions. It's worth noting that her husband, Radek Sikorski, is a prominent figure in Polish politics.

@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz

Anne Applebaum is on the board of directors for the most notorious CIA cut-out in all of US history. So, you know, when reading her froth-mouthed hit piece today on Elon Musk, maybe take that into consideration. https://t.co/Vxil7uCRES

@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz

Anne Applebaum's credibility should be nuked to zero after she got caught red-handed serving as a secret "Inner Cluster Cell" member of a busted British intelligence operation set up for covert censorship & political warfare operations known as the Integrity Initiative. https://t.co/lQw9hRaRa8

@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz

These secret "cluster cells" were set up by British intelligence to have "cluster members" spanning all key positions of political influence in a region The clusters specifically sought as recruits: journalists, politicians, military, academic & business leaders in each country https://t.co/yFcJcvSBCf

@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz

Want to know what a real "organized online influence campaign" looks like? Welp, Anne Applebaum can tell you. She helped create them for her MI6-backed, UK Foreign Office funded political dark arts op Here's her UK cluster secretly activating a Spain cluster to carry out a hit https://t.co/gtRuAkplco

@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz

Cluster members, like Anne Applebaum, were told not to tell anyone about their cell unless they could be trusted. Since it was an intelligence cut-out, they were coy: "If asked about money for funding activities of a cluster, always be firmly vague and helpfully uninformative." https://t.co/DrCnkj5Jkh

@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz

The Integrity Initiative, run out of Anne Applebaum's UK Inner Cluster Cell w/ a supporting cast from British intelligence, was utterly fixated on killing the Nordstream pipeline. In 2018 they plotted: "Start a campaign to prevent construction of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline" https://t.co/jL9GElVVbb

@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz

When the Nordstream pipeline mysteriously blew up & serendipitously accomplished Anne Applebaum's Integrity Initiative high-priority goal of killing the construction, Radek Sikorski (Polish defense minister) famously thanked the US government for blowing it up: https://t.co/Ael3SRY0ch

@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz

Radek Sikorski is Anne Applebaum's husband. https://t.co/azuZjCoK65

DanieleGanser
Posted - September 26, 2023 at 10:34 AM
Saved - September 26, 2023 at 11:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A year ago, on September 26, 2022, the Nord Stream 1 and 2 gas pipelines were destroyed in a terrorist attack. Investigative reporter Seymour Hersh revealed that US Navy divers had planted explosives on the pipelines in June 2022, which were detonated remotely in September. If Hersh is correct, this would be a US terrorist attack on Germany's energy supply. Chancellor Scholz of Berlin remains silent. Watch the video for more details.

@DanieleGanser - Daniele Ganser

Heute vor einem Jahr, am 26. September 2022, wurden die Erdgasleitungen Nord Stream 1 und 2 durch einen Terroranschlag zerstört. Der bekannte US-Investigativreporter Seymour Hersh hat aufgedeckt, dass US-Marinetaucher bereits im Juni 2022 Sprengsätze an den Gaspipelines angebracht haben. Diese wurden im September ferngezündet. Wenn Hersh richtig liegt, ist dies ein Terroranschlag der USA auf die Energieversorgung von Deutschland. Wie reagiert Berlin? Bundeskanzler Scholz schweigt. https://youtube.com/watch?v=pTac78tYUn8…

KimDotcom
Posted - October 21, 2023 at 3:05 PM
Saved - October 24, 2023 at 1:25 PM

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

Ukraine was ready to sign a peace agreement with Russia but the US Govt did not allow it. Confirmed by Gerhard Schroeder, former leader of Germany. https://t.co/2VNlTDPbhr

MoatAwesome_
Posted - October 29, 2023 at 1:42 AM
Saved - November 1, 2023 at 5:58 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conflict in Gaza is not just about the immediate violence. It is connected to larger geopolitical and economic factors. The new Silk Road, a trade route stretching from China to Syria, is seen as a rival by the US and Israel. They aim to control gas reserves and pipelines, cutting off Russian and Iranian gas to Europe. Israel's gas field, Leviathan, becomes crucial. The US and Israel have funded the war in Syria, gaining control over oil fields and ports. Now, Israel seeks to exploit gas reserves and establish an economic corridor. The ongoing violence in Gaza is part of a larger struggle for control and dominance in the region.

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

Thread No.7 This Thread is addressed to non-Arab Twitter users. I don't think people have any idea what's really happening in Gaza and why it is happening. So please give us some time to clarify things for you. https://t.co/ciCC2TBHR4

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

A few weeks ago, right before this war in Gaza ignites , Netanyahu goes to the United Nations General Assembly and he holds up this map and declares his plan for a new Middle East. https://t.co/BFxqRvBqfC

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

And people are going, what is this stupid line this guy's drawing with a red marker? it is an economic corridor that stretches all the way from India to the United Arab Emirates into Saudi Arabia, into Jordan, Israel, and then finally to the entire European continent. https://t.co/QZY9djTkcS

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

I mean, the US at this point, their influence starting to fade, seeing the relevance of the $ recede after they stole $300B from Russia you have all these spooks in Washington and Tel Aviv running around desperately trying to counter bricks and counter China's new Silk Road. https://t.co/yCOHAsW4e6

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

And this is their answer. This is a rival to the new Silk Road. Remember, the ancient Silk Road is the largest, most important trade route in human history. This thing is enormous. It stretches all the way from China to Syria to the Mediterranean Sea. https://t.co/ufpZgt6xsU

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

The Chinese know how important this thing is, and they want to revive it. It is the future of world economics, trade and politics. Within the span of a few weeks, iran and Iraq have signed a railway deal. https://t.co/EgFWyUTaCQ

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

So now you have a rail link for the new Silk Road. And President Assad of Syria N.B 📒(War criminal) , is now visiting China, the world's largest economy, and signing a strategic partnership. This is pivotal. https://t.co/eA9STvtLPD

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

So now the new Silk Road has rail access all the way to the Mediterranean Sea through Sirius port in Latakia. So not just land, but maritime trade. This is crucial. And as enormous and important as all of this is, this is just one aspect. (You still have the gas.) https://t.co/l4AY6qU8t7

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

How can we talk about the Middle East without talking about gas and oil? When the US instigated the Maidan coup in 2014, that wasn't just about NATO expansion and encirclement of Russia. https://t.co/vluiqIFycj

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

This was about surrounding, controlling and cutting off Russian gas to Europe. Russia is the country with the largest proven reserves of natural gas. Control Ukraine, and you control the pipelines that feed and supply Russian gas to Europe. https://t.co/pTyDSqWUtq

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

For decades, you've had US politicians, Republican and Democrat, every administration, openly saying on camera, we don't want NS. There will be we there will be no longer a NS too. We will bring an end to it. You want to have pipelines that don't go through Ukraine and Russia. https://t.co/NJR1jsqgXw

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

For years, we've tried to get the Europeans to be interested in different pipeline routes. It's time to do that. You want to depend more on the North American energy platform, the tremendous bounty of oil and gas that we're finding in North America. https://t.co/KRUyrHx1fr

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

Nord stream, one and two are blown up. I mean, this is without question the most egregious the largest terrorist attack on European infrastructure in modern history. There are only three countries on this planet that can pull this off. They are Russia, Britain and the US. https://t.co/9ZHkavW6Ku

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

let me tell you, it was not Russia. You combine that with the sanctioned packages from the European Union banning Russian oil and gas, I mean, talk about shooting yourself in the foot. https://t.co/AlLqJrpZPX

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

So now there's no more Russian gas coming into Europe. And just like that, the United States have achieved a long standing foreign policy objective. https://t.co/TWYlK0OM97

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

Now, the only other country with enormous gas reserves, the second largest in the world, is Iran. Iran signed the nuclear deal in 2015 and 2016. They're complying in every way imaginable. The IAEA at the UN cannot be happier. And then the United States https://t.co/Xzc1HyrEtp

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

And then the United States, the guys who orchestrated the whole deal, go back on their word and they rip it up, just like that and reimpose sanctions on Iran. So now Iran is barred from selling its oil and gas to Europe and others. https://t.co/3SBlAtrR6Q

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

So Russia and Iran, the two countries with the largest gas reserves, are out of the picture. Then Israel all of a sudden proposed themselves as a solution to the European Union's gas shortages. Take our trilateral energy, for example, that we closed in June with Egypt and Israel. https://t.co/Qn7yt3gIRP

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

In 2010, they conduct a geological survey and find this monstrous giant gas field in the Middle East. It's called the Leviathan, and it's in the Mediterranean Sea on the Levantine basin. That means it's right off the coast of Palestine , Lebanon and Syria. https://t.co/HzQyLUE4X3

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

Syria initially declines, offers over its gas reserves, and simultaneously refuses to lay pipes for a Qatari gas project. What a coincidence. Barely a year later, war breaks out in Syria. And who's funding it? Israel and the US are just some of the parties funding and running. https://t.co/FSETbjerTi

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

this war to overthrow the government in Damascus. Today, the United States control one third of Syria. They control all of Syria's oil fields. And Israel is bombing Syria's most vital port, Latakia, on a regular basis. https://t.co/eDRvMT5gAR

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

So they're cutting off all the oil revenue and destroying crippling any maritime activity, such as trade, such as gas exploration. Another major port on the Levantine coast is in Beirut, which mysteriously explodes in 2020. https://t.co/Bii3iL0MSS

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

And so Israel, proposing itself as a solution to Europe's gas shortages, shows up with an FPSO, this enormous gas extraction vessel, and tries sealing gas from Lebanon's Karish gas field. https://t.co/GbJ1OFSD0q

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

And this reignites a huge maritime border dispute. And Israel has to go and beg the United States to solve this diplomatically because Hazballah said, if you steal one cubic inch of our gas, we will fire our missiles on your ship. Now we come to Gaza. https://t.co/HVUmbXY2MK

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

Gaza is also a concentration camp run by the Israelis and it's been under siege , under naval blockade since 2007. I mean you can't even fish properly, let alone extract gas. And so now the Lebanese, the Syrian, thePalestinian ports, they're all out of action. https://t.co/wniUWIq6BH

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

And the only working port left in coast is the Israeli port on Haifa. I mean how convenient. This makes Israel the only one able to explore gas and implement an economic corridor like the one that Netanyahu held up at the UN. https://t.co/BtxR9aFrRR

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

So in other words, Israel and the United States together, killed off all the competition, stole their goods and cornered the market.

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

But as winter is approaching, israel desperately need to get that gas for Europe. But there's no stability, there can never be stability in the region without solving the Palestinian question. And so when Netanyahu shows up at the UN with his brilliant know, the Israelis thought https://t.co/blbYlgyt6a

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

oh, it's a done know, they'll just get Saudi Arabia to normalize ties and thereby extinguish the Palestinian issue once and for all. https://t.co/Simd18OCQj

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

And that is precisely why they are in Gaza, slaughtering Palestinians like crazy, like they're in berserker know, Israel has bombed Gaza before, but this surpasses anything we've ever seen which is truly saying something.

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

I mean this is know, calling people human animals and massacring them. Israel is just hoping the Palestinians will run away in fear into the desert. They've literally said this, they want to put them in the desert. https://t.co/8KrfexrOKU

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

They want people in Gaza to go to the Sinai Desert and push the people in the West Bank into Jordan. This is genocide and ethnic cleansing without question. https://t.co/WZMvKLGUbv

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

But it also has economic and geopolitical implications. Hamas and the collective resistance when they found out about Israel's plan and Saudi Arabia's wishes to normalize ties with Israel, which would destroy any hope of a Palestinian state, I mean this forced their hand. https://t.co/032udh0oAN

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

It became clear they needed to act and respond immediately, lest Palestine be lost forever. https://t.co/2LevmZOJ3v

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

For Palestinians, this is and always has been a matter of life and death. To be or not to be. Either the resistance axis and the global south expel the American and Israeli colonizers from the Middle East, or Israel and the United States will continue occupying the region, https://t.co/3wkzRLVHn0

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

choking off the new Silk Road, plundering Syria's oil and keeping Russian, Iranian and Arab gas cut off from the world market. This is a decisive moment, and not just for Palestine, because the victors will end up drawing the new map of the world to come. https://t.co/PGz7ty3dCE

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

All rights reserved and all effort is attributed to the creator of the original content Richard Medhurst.

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

Thread No.7 Done . Free palestine. Free palestine. Free palestine. https://t.co/yKQBtT3KLm

patel_patriot
Posted - November 11, 2023 at 7:36 PM
Saved - November 12, 2023 at 1:24 AM

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

Here we go. Finally have a name for the person who was allegedly behind the bombing of the Nordstream pipeline. Didn’t take long to find that the guy was director of an agency “established with active participation of the CIA” https://t.co/X3OP1FmPxa

TCNetwork
Posted - February 8, 2024 at 11:35 PM
Saved - February 9, 2024 at 8:50 PM

@TCNetwork - Tucker Carlson Network

Who blew up Nord Stream? https://t.co/OV1py70Pjc

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks who blew up Nord Stream, to which Speaker 1 jokingly replies that "we" did, implicating Speaker 0. Speaker 0 denies involvement and questions if there is evidence that NATO or the CIA did it. Speaker 1 avoids providing details but suggests looking for someone with an interest in such cases. Speaker 0 expresses confusion over the magnitude of the incident and suggests that if Speaker 1 had evidence, they should present it to win a propaganda victory. Speaker 1 claims it is difficult to defeat the United States in propaganda because they control global media, making it costly to get involved. They believe shining a spotlight on their sources of information won't yield results.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who blew up Nord Stream? Speaker 1: We. You for sure. Speaker 0: I was busy that day. Nate, do you have do you have me? I did not pull up Nord Stream. Thank you, though. Speaker 1: You personally may have an alibi, but the CIA has no such alibi. Speaker 0: Do do you have evidence that NATO or CIA did Speaker 1: You know, I won't get into details, but people always say in such cases, look for someone who is interested. Speaker 0: But I'm confused. I mean, that's the biggest act of industrial terrorism ever, and it's the largest emission of CO2 in in history. Okay. So if you had evidence, and presumably given your security services, your intel services, you would, that NATO, the US, CIA, the West did this? Why wouldn't you present it and win a propaganda victory? Speaker 1: In the war of propaganda, it is very difficult to defeat the United States Because the United States controls all the world's media and many European media, the ultimate beneficiary of the biggest European media are American Financial Institutions. Don't you know that? So it is possible to get involved in this work, But it is cost prohibitive, so to speak. We can simply shine the spotlight on our sources of information, and we will not achieve results.
ricwe123
Posted - July 9, 2024 at 1:12 AM
Saved - July 9, 2024 at 2:08 AM

@ricwe123 - Richard

The US was stirring the pot all along. In 2014, Victoria Nuland was caught picking Ukraine's next prime minister, telling the US Ambassador that Arseniy Yatsenyuk "is the guy" Two years later, she claimed, "we never choose candidates in any country" https://t.co/tanRSle6t9

Video Transcript AI Summary
We do not choose candidates in any country, but we help candidates in democracies present themselves effectively. We do not interfere in elections now. We support peaceful political protests in all countries.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We, of course, never choose candidates in any country. But what we do do in countries that proclaim to be democracies is we offer, the opportunity for, candidates of all kinds to to learn how to to to put themselves forward to best to best effect. Have we ever tried to meddle in other countries' elections? Speaker 1: Oh, probably. We We Speaker 0: don't do that now though. We don't mess around other Speaker 1: people's collections. Yeah. Only for a very good thought. I think Yats is the guy who's got the economic experience, the governing experience. He's the guy you know, what he needs is cleech and tiny book on the outside. He needs to be talking to them 4 times a week. You know? III just think Klitsch going in, he's gonna be at that level working for Yacineuk. It's just not gonna work. Speaker 0: We, of course, never choose candidates in any country. We offer, the opportunity for, candidates of all kinds to to learn how to, to to put themselves forward to best to best effect. And we always support the right of peaceful political protest in any country.
MarioNawfal
Posted - August 15, 2024 at 6:30 AM
Saved - August 16, 2024 at 1:35 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that the Wall Street Journal reported Ukraine planned and executed the Nord Stream pipeline explosions, contradicting previous claims that Russia was responsible. The operation cost around $300,000, and despite the CIA advising President Zelensky to abort the plan, it proceeded. Senior Ukrainian officials deemed the pipelines a legitimate target. The incident resulted in significant gas loss, raising concerns in Germany about NATO's collective defense clause, especially since Ukraine denies any involvement.

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🇺🇦ZELENSKY APPROVED PLAN TO BLOW UP NORD STREAM PIPELINES Despite the mainstream media saying for months that Russia blew up the pipelines, the Wall Street Journal has now revealed it was planned and executed by Ukraine at a cost of $300,000. When the CIA learned of the plan they told Zelesnky to abort it, however it still went ahead. According to senior Ukrainian defense and security officials, the pipelines were a legitimate target. They are jointly owned by Russian, German, French, and Dutch companies, and the explosion caused 800 million cubic meters of gas, equivalent to about 3 months of Danish gas supplies, to escape. It's a problem for Germany, as a senior official said: “An attack of this scale is a sufficient reason to trigger the collective defense clause of NATO, but our critical infrastructure was blown up by a country that we support with massive weapons shipments and billions in cash.” Ukraine still officially denies involvement in the attack. Source: WSJ

DavidCranmerUn1
Posted - August 20, 2024 at 1:01 PM
Saved - January 23, 2025 at 11:35 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I strongly supported the Bergson Group, which played a crucial role in establishing the War Refugee Board, helping to rescue around 200,000 people, partly through the Raoul Wallenberg mission. Charles Jocelyn Hambro significantly influenced banking in the early 20th century, while Émile Francqui's efforts during and after World War I laid foundations for future health initiatives. The posts also discuss the complexities of international banking, political maneuvers, and the intertwining of personal and political relationships throughout history.

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

Tommy D'Alesandro strongly supported the Bergson Group. Hillel Kook's rescue group's activism was the major factor in establishment of the War Refugee Board and that it was an instrument rescuing approximately 200,000, partly by means of the Raoul Wallenberg mission. https://t.co/DnyZXaqDPt

@straussanator - Andrew Strauss

Me cheering my friends picking the brunch spot I wanted the whole time and orchestrated behind the scenes to make happen https://t.co/Oy6EG16LC7

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

Charles Jocelyn Hambro joined his family bank J.C. Hambro & Sons, playing a large part in its merger with Wallenbergs' British Bank of Northern Commerce in 1920, with the combined bank taking the name Hambros Bank in 1921. In 1928, when only 30, Hambro was elected a director of

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

the Bank of England, and between 1932 and 1933 he put all work outside the bank to one side to work on establishing the bank's exchange control division under the direction of Montagu C. Norman, the Bank of England director. In 1937 Hambro was asked to succeed Norman as https://t.co/7fGZW0Fy1n

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

director, but he turned it down as he was suffering from oral cancer. Norman was a close friend of the German Central Bank President Hjalmar Schacht, who served in Hitler's government as President of the Reichsbank and Minister of Economics between 1934 and 1937. Norman was

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

also so close to the Schacht family that he was godfather to one of Schacht's grandchildren. Both were members of the Anglo-German Fellowship and the Bank for International Settlements. In October 1925, Montagu Norman envisaged the creation of what he described in

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

September 1925 as "a private and eclectic Central Banks' 'Club', small at first, larger in the future." That vision had a first materialization at a meeting in early July 1927 which brought together Montagu, his friend Benjamin Strong, head of the Federal Reserve Bank of

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

New York, Reichsbank president Hjalmar Schacht, and Bank of France vice governor Charles Rist at a private home on Long Island (the Bank of Italy had hoped for an invitation but was not included). A deadline for French repayment of its bilateral debt to the United States

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

provided impetus for a new initiative, which took the form of a Committee of Experts appointed to work out a final settlement of the German reparations, known as the Young Committeefor its chairman the American banker Owen D. Young. The committee first met at the Bank of France

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

on 9 February 1929, then on 28 successive sessions ending on 7 June 1929 at the Hotel George V. The first draft concept for the new bank was presented by Belgian banker Émile Francqui on 23 February 1929. In 1896, Émile Francqui became the Belgian consul in Imperial China and https://t.co/uJuwLrrHGs

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

stayed there until 1902. In China he met the future American president Herbert Hoover during negotiations concerning the granting of the Hankow-Canton railroad concession in China in 1901. Although they were competitors, they respected each other very much and became friends. https://t.co/f9VNglXcE5

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

Francqui returned to Belgium in 1902, and began a financial career. He became the managing director of the Banque d'Outremer, and managing director of the Union Minière du Haut Katanga (UMHK). Ten years after his return to Belgium, he became Director of the https://t.co/NN1TVtprMp

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

Société Générale de Belgique, and in 1932 became its Governor. During World War I he was President of the Belgian Comité National de Secours et d'Alimentation (National Aid and Food Committee, abbreviated to CNSA). During World War I, Herbert Hoover in the United States set https://t.co/hDTLt01GUt

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

up the Commission for Relief in Belgium (CRB) to support the CNSA abroad. The future king, Leopold III, requested Francqui take steps to improve the health of the population Belgian Congo, leading to the foundation Prince Leopold Institute of Tropical Medicine in 1931 of which https://t.co/S6Dmzm2d1w

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

Francqui served as first President. Peter Piot and his colleagues at the institute were the first to demonstrate that AIDS was a tropical African disease. ITM has been recognized by the World Health Organizationas a reference centre for AIDS research. ITM also is a national and https://t.co/Z2zVSKObDA

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

international reference centre for a series of diseases and pathogens (such as the Ebola virus). Piot and other scientists called for the emergency release of the experimental ZMapp vaccine for use on humans before it had undergone clinical testing on humans. That year, he was

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

appointed by Director General Margaret Chan to the World Health Organization's Advisory Group on the Ebola Virus Disease Response, co-chaired by Sam Zaramba and David L. Heymann. He also chaired an independent panel convened by Harvard Global Health Institute and the

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine into the national and international response to the epidemic, which sharply criticised the response of the WHO and put forward ten recommendations for the body's reorganisation. In February 2020, he criticised the delay in declaring

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

the 2019–20 novel coronavirus outbreak focused on Hubei, China, a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, and advocated a five-point scale for outbreaks, rather the current binary (emergency/no emergency) system. https://t.co/TMMEm4nIQj

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

In 1931, amidst the high rates of bank failure, deflation, and unemployment that characterized the Great Depression in the United States, Federal Reserve board member Eugene Meyer proposed the establishment of a government agency empowered to make loans to banks and businesses https://t.co/H8fXtFecoX

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

in critical sectors of the US economy. Modeled after the War Finance Corporation, a government corporation that financially supported industries critical to the war effort during World War I, its purpose would be to stimulate economic growth in the United States and restore

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

public confidence in banking and the economy. It would replace the National Credit Corporation, an agency created in 1931 to restore the liquidity of banks on the brink of failure with loans funded by the interbank lending market. On January 22, 1932, the

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

Reconstruction Finance Corporation Act was signed into law by President Herbert Hoover after being passed by Congress with broad bipartisan support. The Reconstruction Finance Corporation (RFC) began its operations on February2, 1932. Like the Federal Reserve, the RFC would

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

loan to banks, but it was designed to serve state-chartered banks and small banks in rural areas that were not part of the Federal Reserve System. Another distinction was that the RFC could make loans on the basis of collateral that the Federal Reserve and other lenders would not

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

accept. The related Banking Act of 1932, signed on February 27, broadened the Federal Reserve's lending powers, and gave it the power to make national policy to mitigate the problems with the economy. Eugene Meyer, who had pushed for both pieces of legislation, after heading up

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

an organization similar to the RFC during World War I, was a governor of the Federal Reserve, and chairman of the Board of the RFC. Essentially, the RFC was the "discount lending" arm of the Federal Reserve. In 1929, Meyer made an offer of $5 million for The Washington Post, but https://t.co/TrV5N6vT5C

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

he was rebuffed. In June 1933, he bought the paper at a bankruptcy auction for $825,000, the paper having been ruined by its spendthrift socialite owner Ned McLean, and by the Great Depression. Meyer had resigned as Fed chairman just three weeks earlier, and he had no https://t.co/krDYaRZbCD

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

experience in the publishing business. But he was prepared to bid up to $2 million for the Post, far more than the other bidders, including William Randolph Hearst. Preferring to remain anonymous, Meyer stayed home from the proceedings. After weeks of speculation when even his

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

daughter Katharine did not know the buyer's name, it was finally revealed in newspapers around the country on June 13. Her grandfather was Marc Eugene Meyer, and her great-grandfather was rabbi Joseph Newmark. On June 5, 1940, Kay Meyer was married to Philip Graham, a graduate https://t.co/o50HIZAQyV

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

of Harvard Law School and a clerk for Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter. They had a daughter, Lally Morris Weymouth, and three sons: Donald Edward Graham (born 1945), William Welsh Graham (1948-2017) and Stephen Meyer Graham (born 1952). One half brother, Bob Graham, was https://t.co/jojazqrQev

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

a former governor of the state of Florida(1979–1987) and a former United States Senator representing Florida from 1987 to 2005. On the morning of September 11, 2001, Porter Goss and Bob Graham were having breakfast with Pakistan's Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) General https://t.co/tFZ5W5MufN

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

Mahmud Ahmed. Ahmad's network had ties to Osama bin Laden and directly funded, supported, and trained the Taliban. Ahmad was forced to retire from his commission when his involvement surfaced in alleged financing of the Hamburg cell led by Mohamed Atta, an al-Qaeda operative https://t.co/e8uBSD2lMz

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

in 2000-01. On the morning of Sept. 12, the deputy secretary of state, Dick Armitage, told Mahmood that Pakistan had to make a choice "you are either 100 percent with us or 100 percent against us—there is no gray area." Mahmood expressed willingness to cooperate, however https://t.co/eRZ89BI9aD

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

in the afternoon, he told George Tenet, the CIA director, that Mullah Omar, the Taliban chief, was a religious man not a man of violence. On September 16, Musharraf sent a delegation to the Taliban with the mission to convince them to hand over Osama bin Laden which included https://t.co/CzCNaMyHvz

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

Lieutenant General Mahmood, and other religious figures. It was learned later that mission actually encouraged Mullah Omar to start a jihad against the US if it attacked Afghanistan. https://t.co/is3cyHp6DE

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

In 1954, Zapata Off-Shore Company was formed as a subsidiary of Zapata Oil, with Bush as president of the new company. He raised some startup money from Eugene Meyer, publisher of the Washington Post, and his son-in-law, Philip Graham. https://t.co/Q8gjbOdc9Y

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

In 1960, Jorge Díaz Serrano of Mexico was put in touch with George H.W. Bush by Dresser Industries. Dresser was owned by Prescott Bush's Yale friends Roland and W. Averell Harriman, and had been George H.W. Bush's first employer upon his graduation from Yale, giving him his

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

start in both the oil business and the defense contractor business. Davey O'Brien resigned from the FBI in 1950 and went to work for H. L. Hunt in land development. O'Brien later entered the oil business, working for Dresser Industries of Dallas and was an adviser to Lamar Hunt https://t.co/30k7E5pZOC

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

during the founding of the American Football League. I. B. Hale was best friends with Heisman winner Davey O'Brien. Hale became chief of security for the Convair aircraft factory and General Dynamics, and was a chairman of ASIS International. https://t.co/pMvbzNIvvq

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

General Dynamics purchased Convair from the Atlas Group in March 1953. The sale was approved by government oversight with the provision that GD would continue to operate out of Air Force Plant 4 in Fort Worth, Texas. From 1955 to 1960, General Dynamics hired Erik Nitsche as a https://t.co/3q2QPo02Hj

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

graphic designer to develop designs for corporate reports and advertising material including the "Atoms for Peace" series of posters for the 1955 International Conference on the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy in Geneva, Switzerland. These designs have become iconic examples of https://t.co/UgmL0c4lRY

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

the mid-century modernist graphic design style. Nitsche was also a consultant to the Museum of Modern Art's department of design and to Standard Oil of New Jersey in the 1950s and 60s. In the book Private Empire by Steve Coll, ExxonMobil is described as extremely https://t.co/RkD6YQfGov

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

powerful "corporate state within the American state" in dealing with the countries in which it drills, going to the point as describing such countries' governments as "constrained". The company's corporate ancestors are also blamed for the outbreak of the 1954 Jebel Akhdar War, https://t.co/TXWOyc3eHE

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

which was sparked by the Iraq Petroleum Company's activities. Coll (right) with Richard N. Haass, President of the Council on Foreign Relations On 31 July 1928, the Red Line Agreement was signed between Anglo-Persian Company (later renamed British Petroleum), Royal Dutch/Shell, https://t.co/TOAdjkmUOU

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

Compagnie Française des Pétroles (later renamed Total), Near East Development Corporation (later renamed ExxonMobil) and Calouste Gulbenkian (an Armenian businessman) to collectively produce oil in the post-Ottoman Empire region, which included the Arabian peninsula, with each of

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

the four major companies holding 23.75 percent of the shares while Calouste Gulbenkian held the remaining 5 percent shares. The agreement stipulated that none of the signatories was allowed to pursue the establishment of oil concessions within the agreed on area without including

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

the other stakeholders, yet other oil companies that were not part of the agreement had the opportunity of pursuing oil concessions individually, which ensued Standard Oil Company of California (later renamed Chevron) to win an oil concession with Saudi Arabia in 1933.

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

In the following year, 1929, the members of the agreement established Iraq Petroleum Company (IPC). Declassified information by the British National Archives later revealed that the British government deliberately destroyed Aflaj irrigation systems and crops by air strikes in

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

order to prevent locals in the interior of Oman from gathering crops and denying them access to water supplies. Furthermore, these documents reveal that the British Foreign Secretary gave the approval on 4 August 1957 to carry out air strikes without prior warning to the locals

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

residing in the interior of Oman. The ban on visas for the press by the sultan and the ability of the British government to carry out air strikes discreetly using Masirah Airfield helped in sustaining the military operations under low profile. On 29 July 1957, the

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

House of Commons debated the Jebel Akhdar War under the title "Muscat and Oman". Kaiser production began in Israel in 1951. By 1956, Kaiser-Frazer was responsible for 28% of Israeli exports. The factory built Kaiser-Frazer products, along with Mack trucks, under license. By

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

the end of the 1950s, the operation was known as Kaiser-Ilin, named after Efraim Ilin, the Israeli entrepreneur who had negotiated the Haifa plant deal with Hickman Price Jr., the nephew of Joseph P. Frazer. In 1938 Efraim Ilin was drafted by Avraham Stern to volunteer in the https://t.co/C8b9zSRTD0

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

Irgun. Hillel Kook led the Irgun's efforts in the United States during World War II to promote Zionism and mainly to save the abandoned Jews of Europe during the Holocaust. His rescue group's activism was the main factor leading to President Roosevelt establishing the https://t.co/XCqI5wLqtD

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

US War Refugee Board, which protected and rescued tens of thousands and possibly many more, partly via the Wallenberg mission. In 1937, Kook began his career as an international spokesperson for the Irgun and Revisionist Zionism. He first went to Poland, where he was involved

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

in fundraising and establishing Irgun cells in Eastern Europe. It was there that he met the founder of the Revisionist movement, Ze'ev Jabotinsky, and became friends with his son Ari. At the founders' request, Kook traveled to the United States with Jabotinsky in 1940, where he

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

soon served as the head of the Irgun and revisionist mission in America, following the elder's death in August. This assignment was clandestine, and Kook publicly denied he was affiliated with the Irgun many times while in America. While in America, Kook led a group of Irgun

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

activists under the pseudonym "Peter Bergson." The name "Bergson Group" or "Bergsonites" eventually became used to refer to all the members of Kook's immediate circle. The Bergson Group was composed of a hard-core cadre of ten Irgun activists from Europe, America and Palestine,

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

including Aryeh Ben-Eliezer, Yitzhak Ben-Ami, Alexander Rafaeli, Shmuel Merlin, and Eri Jabotinsky. The Bergson Group was closely involved with various Jewish and Zionistadvocacy groups, such as the American Friends for a Jewish Palestine and the Organizing Committee of

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

Illegal Immigration. The group also founded some separate initiatives of its own, specifically the Committee for a Jewish Army of Stateless and Palestinian Jews, whose goal was the formation of an Allied fighting force of stateless and Palestinian Jews. Some credit the later

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

formation of the Jewish Brigade, a British unit of Palestinian Jews, with Kook's activism. Two American members of the Bergson Group were author and screenwriter Ben Hecht and cartoonist Arthur Szyk. In 1946 Kook received a letter from Menachem Begin, who had become chief of the

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

Irgun in 1943. Begin admonished Kook for various policy positions that strayed from the official Irgun party-line. These included Kook focusing on the transportation of illegal immigrants to Palestine instead of a "primary" assignment - arms shipments to Irgun fighters, as well

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

as a (rather common) usage of the term "Palestine". At the time Kook was in the habit of saying "Palestine Free State", which Begin thought left too much potential for bi-nationalism. Begin demanded that Kook refer to the future Jewish state as the "Free State of Eretz Israel".

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

Czechoslovakia sold arms to Israel during the 1948 Arab–Israeli War. The deliveries from Czechoslovakia proved important for the establishment of Israel. Jan Masaryk personally signed the first contract on 14 January 1948. In late February 1948, the

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

Communist Party of Czechoslovakia (KSČ), with Soviet backing, assumed undisputed control over the government of Czechoslovakia through a coup d'état. The event alarmed Western countries and helped spur quick adoption of the Marshall Plan, the creation of a state in

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

West Germany, paramilitary measures to keep communists out of power in France, Greece and especially Italy, and steps toward mutual security that would, in little over a year, result in the establishment of NATO and the definitive drawing of the Iron Curtain until the Revolutions

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

of 1989. On 10 March 1948, Jan Masaryk was found dead, dressed only in his pajamas, in the courtyard of the Foreign Ministry (the Černín Palace in Prague) below his bathroom window. Robert Maxwell's contacts with Czechoslovak communist leaders in 1948 as crucial to the https://t.co/fTHz5lWihL

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

Czechoslovak decision to arm Israel in the 1948 Arab–Israeli War. Montagu Norman knowingly authorized the transfer of Czech gold from Czechoslovakia's No. 2 account with the Bank for International Settlements to the No. 17 account, which Norman was aware was managed by the https://t.co/jaspiqZAEO

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

German Reichsbank. Within ten days the money had been transferred to other accounts. In the fall of 1939, two months after the outbreak of World War II, Norman again supported transfers of Czech gold to Hitler's Germany. Under pressure from Rothschild and Vickers, https://t.co/soI4ZawDdF

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

Thorsten Nordenfelt merged with Maxim's in 1888 to form the Maxim Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition Company. Two years later, a bankrupt Nordenfelt was forced out of the company. One of the most notorious sales by Basil Zaharoff was that of the Nordenfelt I, a faulty steam-driven https://t.co/8v1xN7Ko3o

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

submarine model based on a design by the English inventor and clergyman George Garrett, which US Navy intelligence characterized as capable of "dangerous and eccentric movements." Nathan Rothschild retained a substantial shareholding in the new Maxim-Nordenfelt combine https://t.co/Nv4RwlTjvQ

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

and ‘exerted a direct influence over its management’. Nathan Rothschild also funded Cecil Rhodes in the development of the British South Africa Company and the De Beers diamond conglomerate. He later administered Rhodes' estate after Rhodes' death in 1902 and helped to set up https://t.co/JX4zpCuanF

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

the Rhodes Scholarship scheme at the University of Oxford. He was a prominent member of the Round Table movement, created in 1909. Following his death, the peerage was inherited by his son, Lionel Walter Rothschild. https://t.co/h0bcIYIAZ7

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

Oleg Deripaska is a friend of Nat Rothschild, a major investor in both Glencore and United Company RUSAL. Together Deripaska and Rothschild hosted George Osborne and Peter Mandelson on Deripaska's yacht in Corfu in the summer of 2008. Osborne was then Shadow Chancellor of the https://t.co/dsVRNO1X6y

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

Exchequer of the United Kingdom and a friend of Rothschild from school and university. Peter Mandelson has reportedly maintained private contacts over several years with Deripaska. In a 25-minute Youtube video (Russian with subtitles), Alexi Navalny shows footage of https://t.co/gnsGMtRArJ

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

Oleg Deripaska with Russian deputy prime minister Sergei Prikhodko on his yacht in Norway in August 2016. Navalny bases his allegations on accounts written by a ho, self-described “sex expert” Nastya Rybka, who was allegedly one of several sex workers on the yacht. She filmed https://t.co/1GOpln3GwF

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

the trip in an Instagram post, footage of which can be seen in Navalny’s video. In it, Deripaska sits next to Prikhodko and light-heartedly tells Rybka, “We have bad relations with America. Why? Because Sergei Eduardovich’s [Prikhodko] friend is responsible for them. Her https://t.co/KZ4jSkMcnU

@DavidCranmerUn1 - David Cranmer Underdown

name’s Nuland,” he said, referring to Victoria Nuland, then a senior State department official working on Russia. “Nuland, when she was your age, spent a month on a Russian whaling boat. After that she hates our country.” https://t.co/hYx0nvGhtA

KimDotcom
Posted - September 9, 2024 at 4:36 AM
Saved - September 9, 2024 at 2:00 PM

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

Look at this mass murdering demon Victoria Nuland laughing in the face of all Ukrainians while admitting that she killed a peace deal with Russia that would have prevented over a million dead and given Ukraine most of its territory back. The last person she sees may be Ukrainian.

@I_Katchanovski - Ivan Katchanovski

Wow! Nuland basically admits that Ukraine-Russia peace deal, which was close to being finalized in spring 2022, “fell apart” because US, UK & other Western governments “advised” Zelensky government that it was not “good deal” even though even members of Ukrainian delegation stated in recent interviews that this was very good deal, best deal that Ukraine could get & “very real compromise” & that Ukrainian delegation celebrated it with champagne. She basically confirms statements by ex-Israeli PM, head of Ukrainian delegation, Ukrainian officials close to Zelensky, ex-German chancellor & Turkish FM that US & UK blocked this peace deal, which was close to being finalized. Victoria Nuland does not mention at all Russian war crimes in Bucha, which were inflated & mispresented by politicians, media & self-proclaimed experts as reason for ending peace talks. The peace deal agreement included withdrawal of Russian forces from all territory of Ukraine, with exceptions of Donbas & Crimea, whose status was to be determined at meeting of Putin & Zelensky, in exchange for neutral status & demilitarization of Ukraine. https://youtu.be/HiS2dg_atfc?si=4L5Aqe0GEbKoQAFu&t=3192

Video Transcript AI Summary
Naftali Bennett said that Boris Johnson interfered and prevented Ukrainians from signing a deal at the end of negotiations. Ukrainian representative Karakami confirmed that Johnson advised stopping negotiations to win the war militarily. According to Speaker 1, the Ukrainians began asking for advice and it became clear that Putin's main condition was in an annex. This condition included limits on the weapons systems Ukraine could have, which would have neutralized them as a military force. Russia would not have similar constraints, such as pulling back or having a buffer zone. People inside and outside Ukraine questioned whether it was a good deal, and that's when it fell apart.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There was a story first told by former Israeli prime minister, Naftali Bennett, that that both sides were really close to the end to the the successful end of the of the new negotiations and then prime minister Boris Johnson interfered and stopped Ukrainians, prevented Ukrainians from from signing the deal. And then, Ukrainian representative Karakami kind of confirmed that that yes. He said in a in an interview that that there was some kind of advice from Boris Johnson to, to stop negotiating and to win this war militarily. Where is the myth? Where where is the truth? Speaker 1: Relatively late in the game, the Ukrainians began asking for advice, on where this thing was going. And it became clear to us, clear to the Brits, clear to others, that Putin's main condition was buried in an annex, to this document that they were working on. Mhmm. And it included limits on the precise kinds of weapons systems that Ukraine could have after the deal. Such that Ukraine would basically be neutered as a military force. And there were no similar constraints on Russia. Russia wasn't required to pull back. Russia wasn't wasn't required to have a buffer zone from the Ukrainian border. It wasn't required to have the same constraints on its military facing Ukraine. And so, people inside Ukraine and people outside Ukraine started asking questions about whether this was a good deal, and it was at that point that it that it fell apart.
TaranQ
Posted - November 18, 2024 at 7:41 PM
Saved - November 20, 2024 at 5:22 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve explored the War in Ukraine, providing historical context and analysis. The discussion covers key events from WWII, the Cold War, and the 2014 coup, highlighting the complexities of language policies and foreign involvement. I delve into the civil war in Eastern Ukraine, failed peace efforts, and the geopolitical implications of the conflict. The narrative suggests Ukraine may be a pawn in a larger US strategy against Russia, emphasizing the multifaceted nature of the war and its global ramifications. Understanding these layers is essential for analyzing the situation.

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

New Thread ‼️ 🇺🇦🇷🇺🧵 The War in Ukraine: A Historical Context and Analysis.

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

This thread will dive into the historical context, key events, and multifaceted perspectives surrounding the War in Ukraine, from the Soviet legacy and Cold War dynamics to the 2014 coup, failed peace efforts, language policies, and allegations of foreign involvement.

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

A quick overview of what's about to be discussed: - WWII: Soviet sacrifice and influence on current geopolitical relationships. - Cold War: NATO expansion and broken promises. - 2014: Early signs of war, coup, and Western interference. - Anti-Terror: Civil war in Eastern Ukraine. - Minsk: Failed peace agreements. 2022: Sabotaged peace deal. - Nord Stream: Possible US involvement in sabotage. - Gainers: Geopolitical consequences and economic advantages. - Language Policy: Attempts and success in banning Russian. Responsibility: Multifaceted perspectives on cause and blame. Read on for an in-depth analysis of the complex situation in Ukraine, where historical context, geopolitical tensions, and local dynamics converge to provide a broad perspective on the war.

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

1. World War II and the Liberation of Europe: After World War II, Europe liberated itself with significant help from the Soviet Union from Nazi occupation. The Soviet sacrifice was monumental, with estimates speaking of a loss of 27 to 28 million souls, a number that has forever marked the psyche of Russia and its relationship with the West. The Soviet Union played a crucial role in defeating the Third Reich, resulting in the division of Germany into East and West, with the GDR under Soviet influence. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/world-war-two-casualties-by-country?utm_source=perplexity

World War II Casualties by Country 2024 worldpopulationreview.com

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

2. The Cold War and NATO Expansion: With the Cold War drawing to a close and the Soviet Union relinquishing the GDR without a drop of blood, German reunification became possible. This noble act by the Soviets paved the way for a united Germany. However, NATO then began an eastward expansion that caused tensions with Russia. During the negotiations for German reunification, American and German leaders, like James Baker and Hans-Dietrich Genscher, assured the Soviets that NATO would not expand eastward.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Der Westen versprach im Gegenzug zur deutschen Einheit, die NATO nicht weiter nach Osten auszudehnen. Der damalige Außenminister erklärte, dass es keine Absicht gebe, das Radioverteidigungsgebiet nach Osten zu erweitern, was auch die DDR betrifft. Dieses Versprechen hielt jedoch nicht lange. Bald nach der Einheit traten die ersten osteuropäischen Länder der NATO bei. Außenministerin Albright zeigte sich erfreut, als sie ihre Kollegen aus Polen, Tschechien und Ungarn umarmte. Dies wurde von Moskau als bedrohlich wahrgenommen, doch die Reaktion blieb aus, da Russland zu schwach war. --- In exchange for German reunification, the West promised not to expand NATO eastward. The then Secretary of State stated there was no intention to extend the defense area east, including the GDR. However, this promise was short-lived. Soon after reunification, the first Eastern European countries joined NATO. Secretary Albright was pleased to embrace her colleagues from Poland, the Czech Republic, and Hungary. Moscow viewed this as a threat, but was too weak to respond.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Gegenzug zur deutschen Einheit verspricht der Westen, die NATO nicht weiter nach Osten vorrücken zu lassen. In Washington macht der damalige Außenminister weitreichende Zusagen. Speaker 1: Wir waren uns einig, dass nicht die Absicht besteht, das Radioverteidigungsgebiet auszudehnen nach Osten. Das gilt übrigens nicht nur in Bezug auf die DDR, die wir da nicht einverleiben wollen, sondern das gilt ganz generell. Speaker 0: Ein Versprechen von kurzer Lebensdauer. Die ersten osteuropäischen Länder werden in die NATO aufgenommen. Außenministerin Allbright strahlt, als sie ihre Kollegen aus Polen, Tschechien und Ungarn im Arm hält. Ein bedrohlicher Griff aus Sicht Moskaus, doch man ist zu schwach, zu reagieren.

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

The War in Ukraine 3. The Start of the War in 2014: The war in Ukraine did not begin in 2022, but in 2014, a fact that many still overlook, thinking the conflict started with the Russian invasion of 2022. Following the Euromaidan protests, which arose in opposition to President Viktor Yanukovych's refusal to sign an association agreement with the EU, a series of events led to his ousting in February 2014. A notable piece of evidence of foreign interference was a leaked phone call between Victoria Nuland and Geoffrey Pyatt, discussing who should lead the new Ukrainian government, with Nuland praising Arseniy Yatsenyuk as the ideal premier. This conversation, which went viral online, is often cited as evidence of American interference leading to the escalation into civil war. Crimea Tensions on the Crimean peninsula escalated rapidly. Crimea was not annexed; the population expressed its preference through a referendum. The presence of Russian troops was to prevent Ukrainian military forces from threatening the local population or further destabilizing the situation. https://t.co/EJnHYK2QT7

Video Transcript AI Summary
Марсия! Мы требуем свободы слова и права на самовыражение на нашем языке. Хватит нас ущемлять! 16 марта 2014 года, в 8 утра на территории Крыма открылись участки для голосования на референдуме. Работали 27 территориальных и 1203 участковых комиссии. В бюллетене два вопроса: первый — за воссоединение Крыма с Россией, второй — за восстановление Конституции Республики Крым 1992 года и статус Крыма как части Украины. Россия! Поздравляю вас с этим знаменательным днем! Мы идем домой! Крым в России! Ура! --- Marsia! We demand freedom of speech and the right to express ourselves in our language. Enough with the oppression! On March 16, 2014, at 8 AM, polling stations opened in Crimea for the referendum. 27 territorial and 1203 precinct commissions operated. The ballot included two questions: first, for the reunification of Crimea with Russia, and second, for the restoration of the 1992 Constitution of the Republic of Crimea and its status as part of Ukraine. Russia! Congratulations on this significant day! We are going home! Crimea is in Russia! Hooray!
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Вроде подбежавшихся нет, принимается, обращение отправляются. А теперь по простой причаще они берут микрофон, а мы дальше проводим наше вече. -Марсия! -Марсия! -Марсия! -Марсия! -Марсия! -Марсия! -Марсия! -Марсия! -Марсия! -Марсия! -Марсия! -Марсия! -Марсия! -Марсия! Мы требуем, освободим, чтобы нас не преследовали за наше слово, за наше слово. Мы имеем право самовыражаться. Мы имеем право на нашем языке, на которую сами выбери. Хватит вас ущемлять! 16 марта 2014 года. Ровно в 8 утра на территории Крыма открылись участки для голосования на референдуме. Работу начали 27 территориальных территориальных и 1203 участковых комиссии. В бюллетень для голосования внесены два вопроса: первый вы за воссоединение Крыма с Россией на правах субъекта РФ? И второй вы за восстановление действия Конституции Республики Крым 92-го года и за статус Крыма как части Украины? Россия! Дорогие друзья! Приветствую вас с этим знаменателем днем и поздравляю! Мы идем домой! Крым в России! Ура!

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

🇺🇦🇷🇺🧵 Many don't know what happened in Ukraine before February 2022. Let me help you in the next tweets (not necessarily chronological order)

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

4. Anti-Terror Operation and Civil War: After the 2014 coup, people in eastern Ukraine quickly realized that the new government no longer represented them. Ethnic Russians in Donetsk and Luhansk, often labeled as 'pro-Russian separatists' by Western media, felt more connected to Russia than to the pro-Western government in Kiev. They simply wanted to live in peace in their birthplace, Donbas. The 'anti-terror operation' that followed, initiated by then-interim President Oleksandr Turchynov, effectively sparked a civil war, where the population had to resist a government they did not consider legitimate.

Video Transcript AI Summary
13 апреля 2014 года Совет национальной безопасности Украины объявляет о начале антитеррористической операции. Президент Бурчино также объявил о начале этой операции, которая на самом деле является войной против народа Донбасса. --- On April 13, 2014, the National Security Council of Ukraine announced the start of an anti-terrorist operation. President Burchino also declared the beginning of this operation, which is essentially a war against the people of Donbas.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 13 апреля 2014 года Совет национальной безопасности Украины объявляет о начале антитеррористической операции. Несколько часов назад так называемый президент Бурчино объявил о начале антитеррористической операции. Это война против народа Донбасса.

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

5. Minsk Agreements and the Failure of Peace Efforts: In 2014 and 2015, the Minsk agreements were signed, primarily at Russia's initiative, with Germany and France as mediators, to end the hostilities in eastern Ukraine. The regions of Donetsk and Luhansk, where many felt an affinity with Russia, repeatedly asked for Russian support. Putin, feeling a responsibility towards these former Soviet citizens, pushed for peace. However, these agreements were never fully implemented, and later, Western leaders like Angela Merkel of Germany and François Hollande of France admitted that the agreements were meant to buy time for Ukraine's military buildup, indicating that Putin was deceived. Angela Merkel https://t.co/9VC6GXMpHv François Hollande https://t.co/ucvtWvAjO8 archived Full article https://pdfhost.io/v/e0FRLvfzB_Angela_Merkel___Hatten_Sie_gedacht_ich_komme_mit_Pferdeschwanz_

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

🇷🇺🇺🇦🇩🇪 Former German Chancellor Angela Merkel in an interview with the German newspaper Die Zeit: "The 2014 Minsk Agreement was an attempt to give Ukraine time. They used that time to get stronger, which you can see today. Ukraine of 2014/15 is not Ukraine of today. 1/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

🇷🇺🇫🇷🧵⚡️Exclusive. Russian prankers unveiled the truth about Ukraine war — spoken by French ex-president Russian prankers #Vovan and Lexus contacted Francois #Hollande and managed to get him for a frank conversation with "Petro Poroshenko" — an ex-president of Ukraine they posed…

Video Transcript AI Summary
Когда мы подписывали Минские соглашения, мы понимали, что война неизбежна. Эти соглашения дали нам время для подготовки и укрепления армии. Мы хотели выиграть время, чтобы Украина могла восстановиться и усилить свои военные возможности. Минские переговоры важны, так как именно в этот период Украина смогла укрепить свои позиции. Также стоит отметить, что в 2013 году мы смогли свергнуть Януковича и приблизить Украину к Европейскому Союзу. Ваша роль в этом процессе была значительной, и я помню, как мы пришли в Елисейский дворец с Кличко в начале этих событий. Без вас не было бы и Майдана. --- When we signed the Minsk agreements, we understood that war was inevitable. These agreements gave us time to prepare and strengthen our army. We aimed to buy time for Ukraine to recover and enhance its military capabilities. The Minsk negotiations are important because during this period, Ukraine was able to solidify its position. It's also worth noting that in 2013, we managed to oust Yanukovych and bring Ukraine closer to the European Union. Your role in this process was significant, and I remember coming to the Élysée Palace with Klitschko at the beginning of these events. Without you, there would have been no Maidan.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Когда мы подписывали Минские соглашения, мы знали, что война будет неизбежна. Но нам нужно было подготовиться все эти годы, нарастить армию для того, чтобы быть готовыми к этой войне, и Минские дали нам какое-то время для того, чтобы вооружить армию. Ангела недавно сказала об этом. Да, она была права, когда это сказал, потому что думали, что это Путин хотел выиграть время. Нет, это мы хотели выиграть время, чтобы дать возможность Украине восстановиться, укрепить свои военные возможности. И именно поэтому мы должны защищать Минские переговоры, в которых ты сыграл очень важную роль. Их нужно защищать, потому что именно в течение этих семей у Украины появились квесты для укрепления. Единственное, в чём ещё хорошо нам удалось переиграть Путина, помимо Минских, это 2013 год, когда нам удалось сместить Януковича и удалось забрать Украину в Европейский Союз. Да, я думаю, ты сыграл очень важную роль в этом то время. Я до сих пор вспоминаю, как мы пришли в Елисейский дворец, дебернаром Анри Левиль, и вас сопровождал Кличко, и это было в самом начале процесса. Если бы вас там не было, не было бы и майдана.

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

6. Attempts and Success of Banning the Russian Language by the Ukrainian parlement (Verkhovna Rada): The 2012 Language Law: In August 2012, under President Yanukovych, a law was passed granting regional language status to languages spoken by more than 10% of the population in a specific region, making Russian applicable in official documents and government communications in many areas of eastern and southern Ukraine. Annulment Post-Revolution: After Yanukovych's ousting in 2014, the Verkhovna Rada attempted to annul the regional language law, but it was not formally signed by the then-presidents, leaving the law legally in effect. The 2019 Language Law: In April 2019, a new language law was adopted that established Ukrainian as the only state language. This law has a broad impact on the use of Russian in public life, education, and media. Implementation and Controversy: The implementation of this language law has led to accusations of linguicide and has further fueled tensions between ethnic groups. Critics argue that it discriminates against the Russian-speaking minority by limiting their language rights. Success and Reaction: Although Russian is formally restricted in government functions and public sectors, a significant part of the population still speaks Russian, especially in the east and south of the country. This has not only increased internal tensions but is also seen as one of the factors that strengthened separatist movements in the east.

Video Transcript AI Summary
On April 25, 2019, Ukraine enacted a law declaring Ukrainian as the sole language for all aspects of life in the country. This decision sparked significant criticism domestically and internationally, as Russian is widely spoken and holds considerable importance in Ukraine. The law effectively restricts nearly half of the population from using their native language. Experts warn that this move may violate the European Charter of Languages and could exacerbate societal divisions, potentially impacting the country's future.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On April 25, 2019, the of Ukraine adopted a law according to which the only language that can be used in all spheres of life in Ukraine is the Ukrainian language. This law immediately provoked sharp criticism both inside and outside the country. Ukraine is a political state where the second language in importance and spread is the Russian language. By its decision, the Verkhovnorada announced a de facto ban for almost half of the country's citizens to use their native language. Experts suggest that further, the law, contrary to the European Charter of Languages, will be another factor in the split of society and in the future of the country.

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

7. The Sabotaged Peace Agreement of March 2022: In March 2022, shortly after the large-scale Russian invasion, a peace agreement was already on the table, drafted by Putin and Zelensky, ready to be signed in Istanbul the next day. However, the visit of British Prime Minister Boris Johnson to Ukraine, specifically aimed at sabotaging this peace deal, is often cited as a turning point. During this visit, he reportedly encouraged President Zelensky not to agree to this peace deal, significantly diminishing the chances of peace. While Western media described the Russian actions as a cruel, brutal invasion war, reports from Donbass told a different story. Posts from journalists on the ground like Thomas Röper indicated that many civilians in Donbass welcomed the arrival of Russian troops. These soldiers were seen as protectors offering humanitarian aid such as food and medicine, protecting the local population from hostilities. https://t.co/WcLm3JEROh

Video Transcript AI Summary
Суворов подписал документ, который был парафирован руководителем переговорной группы из Киева. Suvorov signed a document that was initialed by the head of the negotiation group from Kyiv.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Суворов был парафирован руководителем переговорной группы из Киева. Он поставил там свою подпись. Вот он.

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

10) 🇷🇺🇺🇦🧵 Peace deal March 2022 Istanbul. Barely one month into the war, a peace agreement had already been drafted by both sides and was ready to be signed in Istanbul by Putin and Zelensky. When the West heard that a peace agreement was on the table, Boris Johnson was quickly…

Video Transcript AI Summary
Переговоры были парафированы руководителем переговорной группы из Киева, который поставил свою подпись. The negotiations were initialed by the head of the negotiation group from Kyiv, who signed it.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Переговоры был парафирован руководителем переговорной группы из Киева. Он поставил там свою подпись. Вот он.

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

8. Nord Stream and Strong Indications of US Involvement: The sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines in 2022 is widely attributed to the United States by many analysts. This is supported by various clues. Before the war started, American politicians had openly spoken out against the Nord Stream pipelines. President Biden stated in a press conference with Scholz that Nord Stream would end if Russian tanks entered Ukraine, and when asked how he would do it, he responded with confidence: "Make no mistake, we’ll be able to do it." The US has the technology and military capacity for such sabotage. Shortly before the sabotage, there was a military exercise named BALTOPS at the same location, including underwater drones. Flightradar24 detected flights with transponders turned off. Moreover, a Polish politician thanked the USA on X for the sabotage with a "thank you USA" post, which he later deleted. The German government came up with an absurd theory that a group of people with a rented yacht was responsible. This idea is unlikely; a yacht cannot anchor in open sea, and storing explosives (some sources mention hundreds to thousands of kilograms) under a seat, as suggested after finding explosive residues, is impractical. The need for decompression for deep operations is ignored, and the most absurd aspect is that the boat was not destroyed to erase all traces, as one would expect from real terrorists, but was simply returned to the rental company, only increasing the likelihood of identification. https://t.co/CkqIp4zw1p https://t.co/QKAOdZNpwK

Video Transcript AI Summary
If Russia invades Ukraine by crossing its border, Nord Stream 2 will be halted. We will ensure that it is stopped, despite the project being under Germany's control.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me answer this first question first. If Germany if, if Russia invades, that means tanks or troops crossing the, the the border of Ukraine, again, then, there will be, we there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2. We we will bring it into it. But but how will you how will you do that exactly since the project and control of the project is within Germany's control? We will, I promise you we'll be able to do it.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Nord Stream 2 pipeline must be permanently halted as it poses a significant threat, particularly in the context of Russian aggression. There is still time to act against it, but swift action is essential. Stopping Nord Stream 2 is seen as a crucial step to prevent energy blackmail and protect peace. Various strategies are being considered to ensure its cancellation, and legislative measures have already delayed the project. If Russia invades Ukraine, the pipeline will not proceed. The urgency to terminate Nord Stream 2 is clear, and it should be dismantled to prevent further risks. Recent damage to the pipeline has raised concerns about sabotage, with misinformation being spread by Russia.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The sledgehammer that we have against Putin is to shut down the Nord Stream 2 pipeline and do it permanently. Speaker 1: This is a real acute and proven threat. I'm a big proponent of, making sure we stop Nord Stream 2 from from happening. Speaker 2: Stopping the Nord Stream 2. And, you know, Trump also isn't wrong to identify Nord Stream 2, this pipeline that I talked about today, as problematic. Speaker 1: There is still time to stop Nord Stream 2 if we act quickly. Speaker 3: The timeline Speaker 2: for action is short. Speaker 1: And I'm not gonna stop working to halt Nord Stream 2 to stop Russia. End it once and for all. Speaker 2: I mean, he needs to kill the keys, the Nord Stream, Nord Stream 2 pipeline right now. Speaker 4: And I think the most important thing right now and what Zelensky said is they want Nord Stream 2 stopped. That's what I see as the most tangible reason and the tangible, effect. Speaker 0: I believe we must stop this Nord Stream 2 pipeline. Speaker 2: We should have brought the project to an end. Speaker 1: There's still time to stop it, but we need to act quickly. Speaker 0: Nord Stream 2 is danger is a danger to peace as we know it. Speaker 2: Nord Stream 2 is energy blackmail. Speaker 0: It's Putin's pipeline. It's a trap, for the a Russian trap. Speaker 2: There will be, we there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2. We we will bring an end to it. We will put an end to it. Germany should cancel the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline. We're looking at a variety of things we could do there. Speaker 1: We've been so far using trying to use other tools to stop the Nord Stream 2. Speaker 5: And we got legislation that was appropriate to now have delayed this project significantly. We need further tools. We're prepared to use those tools. Should you provide them, to us? And and we've also used our diplomatic capabilities. Speaker 1: This pipeline must be stopped, and the only way to prevent the completion is to use all the tools available to do that. Speaker 2: If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or another, Nordstrom 2 will not move forward. Kill Nordstrom 2 now, and let it rust beneath the waves of the Baltic. Speaker 3: The operator of the Nordstrom gas pipelines, which run between Russia and Germany, says that three lines on the Baltic seabed were damaged on Tuesday. Speaker 2: It was, a deliberate act of sabotage, and now the Russians are pumping out disinformation in line. This
Video Transcript AI Summary
Regarding Nord Stream 2, we are having strong discussions with our German allies. I want to emphasize that if Russia invades Ukraine, Nord Stream 2 will not proceed.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: With regard to Nord Stream 2, we continue to have, very strong and clear conversations, with our German allies, and I wanna be clear with you today. If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Lucas Wilhelm and Tom Colmer discovered the abandoned ship Andromeda in a deserted harbor on Rugen. The yacht became notable after investigators from the federal criminal police removed its navigation technology during an investigation into a possible plot involving explosives on the Nord Stream pipelines. Experts believe a group of six may have used the Andromeda for this purpose. Investigators found remnants of explosives on board, suggesting they were stored in boxes. A former combat diver expressed skepticism about using the Andromeda solely for transporting explosives, citing logistical challenges. Intelligence agencies suspect the saboteurs could be Russians or Ukrainians, with accusations flying between Russia, the USA, and Great Britain. The investigation into the Andromeda remains ongoing.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My colleagues, Lucas Wilhelm and Tom Colmer, located the ship and took a look around on board. Speaker 1: Now I There is a ship there. Speaker 2: 1 completely abandoned and alone. In a deserted harbor on Rugen, the Andromeda lies on dry land, and the sea clam sailing season begins. Within a few days, the boat became world famous. However, it is no longer seaworthy since investigators from the federal criminal police office were on board. Speaker 0: Normally, dozens of yachts from the charter company are moored here in this former military port on Reuben. I'm told me that Now only the Andromeda is here because the BKA removed the ship's navigation technology during its investigation in January. I'm told Speaker 2: that They aim to track the final locations of the sailing ship. After the investigators, we are the 1st on board. Experts suspect that a group of 6 people set sail on the 15 meter long yacht to place explosives on the Nord Stream pipelines. Speaker 0: I am still Investigators are said to have found remains of explosives on this table. The federal criminal police office inspected the yacht thoroughly over a 3 day period, and the explosives could have been stored in these boxes. Speaker 2: So he has experience with explosives and diving. Such missions were his profession. Jen Toner, a former combat diver, doubts that the perpetrators only use the Andromeda to transport the explosives to the Baltic Sea. Speaker 1: That doesn't make any sense to me because let's put it this way. Having the explosives on board is one thing. If we now have to prepare the whole thing to have a total explosive charge, then I have 200 kilos. Speaker 0: But I also have to get Speaker 1: the 200 kilos out through the stairs to the upper deck. Speaker 0: That's up to 500 kilos. Speaker 1: Yes. Then it becomes even more unlikely. Speaker 2: Get to me. The professional diver suspects that the tracks on the Andromeda could have been deliberately laid to lure the investigator onto the wrong track. Intelligent services suspect that the saboteurs are Russians or Ukrainians with Russia accusing the USA or Great Britain. It remains exciting in the case of the Yatlon Rugen.

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

@barlaat Who blew up Nordstream?

Video Transcript AI Summary
If Russia invades Ukraine, crossing its borders, Nord Stream 2 will be halted. We will ensure that it is stopped, despite the project being under Germany's control. I assure you we will manage to do it.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me answer the first question first. If Germany if, if Russia invades, that means tanks or troops crossing the, the the border of Ukraine again, then there will be, we there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2. We we will bring it into it. Speaker 1: But but how will you how will you do that exactly since the project in control of the project is within Germany's control. Speaker 0: We will, I promise you we'll be able to do it.
Video Transcript AI Summary
We must permanently shut down the Nord Stream 2 pipeline to counter Putin's aggression. This pipeline poses a significant threat and is seen as a tool for energy blackmail. There is still time to halt its progress, but action is needed urgently. Stopping Nord Stream 2 is crucial for peace and security. Germany should cancel the project, and we must utilize all available tools to prevent its completion. If Russia invades Ukraine, Nord Stream 2 will not proceed. Recent damage to the pipeline has been attributed to sabotage, with misinformation being spread by Russia. It's essential to end Nord Stream 2 now and ensure it does not become operational.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The sledgehammer that we have against Putin is to shut down the Nord Stream 2 pipeline and do it permanently. Speaker 1: This is a real acute and proven threat. Speaker 2: I'm a big proponent of, making sure we stop Nord Stream 2 from from happening. Stopping the Nord Stream 2. And, you know, Trump also isn't wrong to identify Nord Stream 2, this pipeline that I talked about today, as problematic. Speaker 1: There is still time to stop Nord Stream 2 if we act quickly. Speaker 2: The timeline for action is short. Speaker 1: And I'm not gonna stop working to halt Nord Stream 2 to stop Russia. Speaker 3: End it once and for all. Speaker 2: I mean, he needs to kill the keys, the Nord Stream, Nord Stream 2 pipeline right now. Speaker 4: And I think the most important thing right now, and what Zelensky said is they want Nord Stream 2 stopped. That's what I see as the most tangible reason and the tangible, effect. Speaker 0: I believe we must stop this Nord Stream 2 pipeline. Speaker 2: We should have brought the project to an end. There's still time to stop it, but we need to act quickly. Speaker 3: Nord Stream 2 is danger is a danger to peace as we know it. Speaker 2: Nord Stream 2 is energy blackmail. Speaker 0: It's Putin's pipeline. It's a trap, for the a Russian trap. Speaker 3: There will be, we there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2. We we will bring an end to it. Speaker 2: We will put an end to it. Germany should cancel the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline that we're looking at a variety of things we could do there. Speaker 1: We've been so far using trying to use other tools to stop the Nord Stream 2. Speaker 5: And we got legislation that was appropriate to now have delayed this project significantly. We need further tools. We're prepared to use those tools. Should you provide them, to us? And and we've also used our diplomatic capabilities. Speaker 1: This pipeline must be stopped, and the only way to prevent the completion is to use all the tools available to do that. Speaker 2: If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward. Kill Nord Stream 2 now and let it rust beneath the waves of the Baltic. Speaker 6: The operator of the Nord Stream gas pipelines, which run between Russia and Germany, says that three lines on the Baltic seabed were damaged on Tuesday. Speaker 3: It was a deliberate act of sabotage, and now the Russians are pumping out disinformation in line. Speaker 4: This is
Video Transcript AI Summary
We are having strong discussions with our German allies about Nord Stream 2. I want to emphasize that if Russia invades Ukraine, Nord Stream 2 will not proceed.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: With regard to Nord Stream 2, we continue to have very strong and clear conversations, with our German allies, and I wanna be clear with you today. If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward.

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

@peacemaket71 I thought they had it together? It was a sailing boat, The Andromeda 😉😂 wasn't it? The boat was rented and nicely returned 🤦‍♂️. The German story was so ridiculous that a child would know it's BS. Left: German - Right: English

Video Transcript AI Summary
Die Andromeda liegt verlassen in einem Hafen auf Rügen, nachdem das Bundeskriminalamt die Navigationstechnik ausgebaut hat, um die letzten Standorte des Schiffs zu ermitteln. Die Yacht ist nicht mehr seetüchtig und wurde während der Ermittlungen auf mögliche Verbindungen zu Sprengstoffanschlägen untersucht. Auf dem Schiff fanden die Ermittler Sprengstoffreste, und es wird vermutet, dass eine Gruppe von sechs Personen an Bord war, um Sprengladungen an den Nord Stream Pipelines zu platzieren. Ein ehemaliger Kampfschwimmer äußert Zweifel, dass der gesamte Sprengstoff nur mit der Andromeda transportiert wurde, und vermutet, dass die Spuren absichtlich gelegt wurden, um die Ermittler in die Irre zu führen. Geheimdienste haben die Saboteure als mögliche Russen oder Ukrainer identifiziert, während Russland die USA und Großbritannien beschuldigt. --- The Andromeda lies abandoned in a harbor on Rügen after the Federal Criminal Police removed its navigation equipment to trace the ship's last locations. The yacht is no longer seaworthy and was examined for possible connections to explosive attacks. Investigators found traces of explosives on board, and it is suspected that a group of six was aboard to place charges on the Nord Stream pipelines. A former combat diver doubts that all the explosives were transported solely by the Andromeda and believes the traces may have been intentionally planted to mislead investigators. Intelligence agencies have identified the saboteurs as potential Russians or Ukrainians, while Russia accuses the USA and the UK.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Meine Kollegen Lukas Wilhelm und Tom Kollmer haben das Schiff ausfindig gemacht und sich an Bord mal umgesehen. Ja, ein Schiff liegt da, eins ganz verlassen und alleine. Speaker 1: In einem verlassenen Hafen auf Rügen liegt die Andromedam auf dem Trockenen und das trotz Saison beginnt der Seeklamm. Innerhalb weniger Tage ist das Boot weltberühmt geworden. Seetüchtig ist es allerdings nicht mehr, seit er mir kann das Bundeskriminalamtes an Bord waren. Speaker 2: Normalerweise stehen hier auf diesem ehemaligen Militärhafen auf Rügen Dutzende Yachten der Charterfirma. Jetzt ist Sino di Androme da, denn das BKA hat bei seinen Ermittlungen im Januar die Navigationstechnik des Schiffs ausgebaut. Speaker 1: So will man die letzten Standorte des Segelschiffs nachvollziehen. Nach den Ermittlern sind wie die Ersten an Bord mit der fünfzehn Meter langen Jacht zu vermuten. Die Experten ist eine sechstöckige Gruppe in See gestochen, Sprenggeladungen an den Nord Stream Pipelines zu platzieren. Speaker 2: Auf diesem Tisch sollen die Ermittler Sprengstoffreste gefunden haben. Insgesamt war das Bundeskriminalamt drei Tage an Bord und hat die Yacht gründlich untersucht und in diesen Kisten könnte der Sprengstoff gelagert worden sein. Speaker 1: Er hat Erfahrung mit Sprengstoff und Tauchen. Solche Missionen waren sein Beruf. Jens Höhner, ehemaliger Kampfschimmer, bezweifelt, dass die Täter nur mit der Andromeda den Sprengstoff auf die Ostsee gefahren haben. Speaker 3: Für mich ergibt das gar keinen Sinn, weil ich sag mal so, den Sprengstoff hier an Bord zu haben, ist die eine Geschichte. Wenn wir ja jetzt das Ganze vorbereiten müssen für, eine gesamte Sprengung zu haben, dann hab ich zweihundert Kilo. Die zweihundert Kilo muss ich aber auch hier durch den Aufgang rausbringen an Oberdeck. Sicher bis zu fünfhundert Kilo. Ja, dann wird's dann wird's noch unwahrscheinlicher. Speaker 1: Der Profitaucher vermutet, die Spuren auf der Andromeda könnten gezielt gelegt worden sein, Ermittler auf eine falsche Firma zu locken. Geheimdienste verboten, dass die Saboteure Russen oder Ukrainer sind. Russland beschuldigter gegen die USA oder Großbritannien, ist beim Spannend im Fall die Jacht auf Rügen.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Andromeda, an abandoned yacht in a deserted harbor on Rugen, gained notoriety after investigators from the federal criminal police boarded it. The ship, once part of a charter fleet, is now stripped of its navigation technology. Investigators suspect that a group of six used the 15-meter yacht to transport explosives for an operation involving the Nord Stream pipelines. Remnants of explosives were found on board, and the yacht underwent a thorough three-day inspection. A former combat diver expressed skepticism about the practicality of using the Andromeda solely for transporting explosives, suggesting that the evidence might have been planted to mislead investigators. Intelligence agencies suspect the saboteurs may be Russian or Ukrainian, with accusations flying between Russia, the USA, and Great Britain. The case remains under investigation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My colleagues, Lucas Wilhelm and Tom Colmer, located the ship and took a look around on board. Now I Speaker 1: There is a ship there. 1 completely abandoned and alone. Speaker 2: 89 In a deserted harbor on Rugen, the Andromeda lies on dry land, and the sea clam's sailing season begins. Within a few days, the boat became world famous. However, it is no longer seaworthy since investigators from the federal criminal police office were on board. Speaker 0: Normally, dozens of yachts from the charter company are moored here in this former military port on Rubin. I'm calling it out. Now only the Andromeda is here because the BKA removed the ship's navigation technology during its investigation in January. I'm going Speaker 2: to They aim to track the final locations of the sailing ship. After the investigators, we are the 1st onboard. Experts suspect that a group of 6 people set sail on the 15 meter long yacht to place explosives on the Nord Stream pipelines. Speaker 0: I'm still Investigators are said to have found remains of explosives on this table. The federal criminal police office inspected the yacht thoroughly over a 3 day period. Okay. And the explosives could have been stored in these boxes. Speaker 2: So he has experience with explosives and diving. Such missions were his profession. Jen Toner, a former combat diver, doubts that the perpetrators only use the Andromeda to transport the explosives to the Baltic Sea. Speaker 1: That doesn't make any sense to me because let's put it this way. Having the explosives on board is one thing. If we now have to prepare the whole thing to have a total explosive charge, then I have 200 kilos. But I also have to get the 200 kilos out through the stairs to the upper deck. Speaker 0: That's up to 500 kilos. Speaker 1: Yes. Then it becomes even more unlikely. Speaker 2: The professional diver suspects that the tracks on the Andromeda could have been deliberately laid to lure the investigator onto the wrong track. Intelligent services suspect that the saboteurs are Russians or Ukrainians with Russia accusing the USA or Great Britain. It remains exciting in the case of the Yaffan Rugen.

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

9. Who Benefits? The war has led to a weakened Europe, aligning with the goals outlined in the RAND report to weaken Russia and unravel the friendly ties between Germany and Russia. This has enabled the US to sell their LNG at higher prices, while countries like India indirectly benefit by buying Russian oil and gas at a lower price and then reselling to Europe. More on the RAND report https://t.co/F1eKdVHqlT

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

6B) 🇷🇺🇺🇦🧵 RAND corporation The RAND corporation also talks about Europe in a later report: On 25th January 2022 the RAND corporation wrote another report with the title : "Weakening Germany, strengthening U.S." in which they state that weakening Germany would lead to…

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

10. Ukraine as a Strategic Pawn: - Proxy Warfare: There's a growing narrative, especially in some political and academic circles, that Ukraine has been positioned as a proxy in a larger US-Russian geopolitical contest. This perspective views the conflict not just as a bilateral issue between Ukraine and Russia but as a broader strategic game where the US aims to weaken Russia's influence and military capabilities indirectly through Ukraine. - US Strategic Interests: The US has provided significant military, financial, and political support to Ukraine, which some analysts argue aligns with strategic interests outlined in various think tank reports, including those from RAND Corporation. These interests include extending Russia's military and economic overextension, similar to how the US supported Afghan mujahideen against the Soviets in the 1980s. - Battering Ram Concept: The notion of Ukraine as a "battering ram" suggests that it's being leveraged by the US to: - Exhaust Russian Resources: By engaging in a prolonged conflict, it forces Russia to expend resources, potentially weakening it on a global stage. - Test Military Capabilities: Ukraine has become a testing ground for new weapons systems and tactics against a near-peer adversary, providing valuable real-world data for Western military technology. - Isolate Russia Geopolitically: By rallying NATO and other allies around the cause of Ukraine, the US aims to further isolate Russia, both politically and economically. - Implications for Ukraine: While this strategy might serve broader US geopolitical aims, it places Ukraine in a precarious position, potentially prolonging the conflict and leading to significant devastation within its borders, with critics arguing that it turns Ukraine into a sacrificial pawn in US-Russia relations.

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

11. Conclusion The conflict in Ukraine is multifaceted, with historical legacies, geopolitical maneuvers, and local dynamics all playing significant roles. The narrative that Ukraine may be serving as a strategic tool in a broader US strategy against Russia adds another dimension to the conflict, suggesting that what appears primarily as a regional dispute could also be part of a larger international power play. Understanding these layers is crucial for any analysis of the war and its implications for global politics. For more on the Ukraine war explore my Russia - Ukraine mega thread. 👇👇👇 https://t.co/3slE9M77Fl

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

🇷🇺🇺🇦🧵🧵🧵Russia - Ukraine MEGA combination thread.

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

End of official thread! But I'll add other stuff that's relevant below. Like this one. 👇 Bookmark this. Keep this. Remember this. Watch it often. Memorize it. Learn it. Understand it. Grasp it. Believe it. And never forget it. Ever. @LionelMedia https://t.co/8ptXI5rstr

Video Transcript AI Summary
The conflict involving Ukraine and Russia has deep historical roots, beginning with a 1990 agreement where NATO promised not to expand eastward in exchange for German unification. However, NATO expansion began in 1999 under Clinton, which Russia initially tolerated. Tensions escalated after the U.S. withdrew from the anti-ballistic missile treaty in 2002 and engaged in regime change in Ukraine in 2014. Despite Putin's repeated requests to halt NATO's eastward expansion, the U.S. maintained an open-door policy for NATO membership. Negotiations proposed by Putin in late 2021 were rejected, leading to the current conflict. Following the start of military operations, Ukraine was pressured to continue fighting despite offers of neutrality, resulting in significant casualties.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is not an attack by Putin on Ukraine in the way that we are told every day. This started in 1990, February 9, 1990. James Baker the 3rd, our secretary of state, said to Mikhail Gorbachev, NATO will not move 1 inch eastward if you agree to German unification, basically ending World War 2. And, Gorbachev said that's very important. Yes. NATO doesn't move, and we agree to German unification. The US then cheated on this already starting in 1994 when Clinton signed off on a, basically, a plan to expand NATO all the way to Ukraine. This is when the so called neocons took power. And, Clinton was the first agent of this. And the expansion of NATO started in 1999 with Poland, Hungary, and Czech Republic. At that point, Russia didn't much care. There was no border other than with the Konigsberg, but other than that, there was no direct threat. Then, the US, led the bombing of Serbia in 1999. That was bad, by the way, because that was a use of NATO to bomb a European capital, Belgrade, 78 straight days to break the country apart. The Russians didn't like that very much. But Putin became president. They swallowed it. They complained, but, even Putin started out pro European, pro American, actually asked maybe we should join NATO when there was still the idea of some kind of mutually respectful relationship. Then 911 came, then came, Afghanistan, and the Russians said, yeah. We'll support you. We understand to root out terror. But then came 2 other decisive actions. In 2002, the United States unilaterally walked out of the anti ballistic missile treaty. This was probably the most decisive event never discussed in this context. But what it did was trigger the US putting in missile systems in Eastern Europe that Russia views as a dire direct threat. In 2,000, 4, 5, we engaged in a soft regime change operation in Ukraine. But in 2009, Yanukovych won the election, and he became president in 2010 on the basis of neutrality for Ukraine. That calmed things down because the US was pushing NATO, but the people of Ukraine on the opinion polls didn't even wanna be a NATO. They knew that the country is divided between ethnic Ukrainian, ethnic Russian. What do we want with this? We wanna stay away from your problems. So in February 22, 2014, the United States participated actively in the overthrow of Yanukovych. A typical US regime change operation. Have no doubt about it. And the Russians did us a favor. They intercepted a really ugly call between Victoria Nuland, my colleague at Columbia University now, between her and, the US ambassador to Ukraine, Jeffrey Piatt, who's a senior state department official till today. And they talked about regime change. They said, who's gonna be the next government? All of this is to say, the US then said, okay. Now NATO's really gonna enlarge. And Putin kept saying, stop. You promised no NATO enlargement. It's been, by the way, I forgot to mention in 2004, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, 7 more countries in the not 1 inch eastward. And then okay. It's a long story, but the US kept rejecting the basic idea, don't expand NATO to Russia's border in a context where we're putting in goddamn missile systems after breaking a treaty. 2019, we walked out of the intermediate nuclear force treaty. On December 15, 2021, Putin put on the table a draft Russia US security agreement. You can find it online. The basis of it is no NATO enlargement. I called the White House that next week after that, begging them, take the negotiations. Putin's offered something. Avoid this war. Oh, Jeff, there's not gonna be a war. Announce that NATO's not gonna enlarge. Oh, don't worry. NATO's not gonna enlarge. I said, oh, you're gonna have a war over something that's not gonna happen? Why don't you announce them? And he said, no. No. Our policy is an open door. This is Jake Sullivan. Our policy is an open door policy. Open door for NATO enlargement. That is under the category of bullshit, by the way. You don't have your right to put your military bases anywhere you want and expect peace in this world. They turned down the negotiations. Then the special military operation started, and 5 days later, Zelensky says, okay. Okay. Neutrality. And then the United States and Britain said, no way. You guys fight on. We got your back. We don't have your front. You're all gonna die, but we got your back as we kept pushing them into the front lines. That's 600,000 deaths now of Ukrainians since Boris Johnson flew to Kyiv to tell them to be brave.

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

For the Dutch and a German version of this thread visit 👇 Dutch : https://t.co/mS2DQ0O67f German : https://t.co/EhdLDH8ZcQ

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

Nieuw draadje ‼️ 🇷🇺🇺🇦🧵De Oorlog in Oekraïne: Een Historische Context en Analyse

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

🇷🇺🇺🇦🧵 Der Krieg in der Ukraine: Ein historischer Kontext und Analyse.

RT_com
Posted - February 26, 2025 at 11:44 AM
Saved - February 27, 2025 at 2:43 AM

@RT_com - RT

'F**k the EU' Jeffrey Sachs shares a leaked phone call between Nuland and Pyatt who discuss how to overthrow a democratically elected president in Ukraine back in 2014 https://t.co/VdhIHvgbab

Video Transcript AI Summary
In February 2014, the US actively worked to overthrow Yanukovych. You can hear this in the phone call between Victoria Nuland and US Ambassador Peter Piatt. It's fascinating. In the call, I mentioned that Klitschko shouldn't be in the government, it's not necessary or a good idea. Yatseniuk is the right person because of his economic and governing experience. Also, "fuck the EU." We need to do something to make this situation better.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 02/2014, the US worked actively to overthrow Yanukovych. Everybody knows the phone call by my Columbia University colleague, Victoria Nuland, and The US Ambassador, Peter Piatt. Listen to it. It's fascinating. I don't think cleats should go into the government. I don't think it's necessary. I don't think it's a good idea. I think Yatz is the guy who's got the economic experience, the governing experience, and, you know, fuck the EU. No. Exactly. And I think we've gotta do something to make You don't get better evidence.
BowesChay
Posted - May 27, 2025 at 10:22 AM
Saved - May 27, 2025 at 2:31 PM

@BowesChay - Chay Bowes

As Germany greenlights the use of Taurus missiles inside Russia Heres a recording a year ago of Senior German officers planning an assault on the Crimean Bridge The US started this conflict in the shadows, and NATO is now fighting it from the shadows. https://t.co/pk9s1SpGuB

Video Transcript AI Summary
Es wird diskutiert, wie man der Ukraine bei der Zerstörung einer Brücke helfen kann, wobei die Größe der Brücke ein Problem darstellt, da möglicherweise viele Flugkörper benötigt werden. Es wird erörtert, ob man die Pfeiler der Brücke angreifen sollte, aber selbst das könnte schwierig sein. Man müsse der Ukraine Missionsplanungsdaten und Zielinformationen zur Verfügung stellen, insbesondere für kleine Ziele. Es wird die politische Sensibilität der direkten Beteiligung deutscher Kräfte betont. Eine direkte Verbindung zwischen MBDA und der Ukraine wäre weniger problematisch als eine direkte Verbindung deutscher Kräfte. Jegliche Beteiligung Deutschlands an der Missionsplanung könnte eine rote Linie darstellen. Es werden verschiedene Ausbildungsoptionen für ukrainische Soldaten in Betracht gezogen, darunter ein Fast Track und ein Long Track. Alternativ könnte man die Briten bitten, die Ausbildung in der Übergangsphase zu übernehmen. Direkte Beteiligung, wie z.B. die Planung in Deutschland und der Transport der Daten nach Polen, wird als inakzeptabel angesehen. Wenn keine direkte Beteiligung gewünscht ist, würde die Ausbildung länger dauern und die Komplexität des Einsatzes wäre reduziert. --- The discussion revolves around how to assist Ukraine in destroying a bridge, with the bridge's size posing a challenge as it may require many missiles. Attacking the bridge's pillars is discussed, but even that could be difficult. Providing Ukraine with mission planning data and target information is necessary, especially for small targets. The political sensitivity of direct German involvement is emphasized. A direct connection between MBDA and Ukraine would be less problematic than a direct connection of German forces. Any German involvement in mission planning could be a red line. Various training options for Ukrainian soldiers are considered, including a Fast Track and a Long Track. Alternatively, the British could be asked to take over the training during the transition phase. Direct involvement, such as planning in Germany and transporting the data to Poland, is considered unacceptable. If no direct involvement is desired, the training would take longer and the complexity of the operation would be reduced.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Kann da Speaker 1: noch mal schnell ergänzen wegen der Brücke, weil wir die uns intensiv angeguckt haben und die Brücke ist leider aufgrund ihrer Größe wie 'n Flugplatz. Das heißt, es kann durchaus sein, dass ich dafür 10 oder 20 Flugkörper brauche. Wir haben uns Speaker 0: wohl 'n Geschäft, wenn jetzt da wo's aufklappt, wenn Du die Pfeiler nimmst. Speaker 1: Ja, und selbst der der Pfeiler, da machen wir unter Umständen nur 'n Loch rein und dann stehen wir da. Speaker 2: Ja, ja. Also, jetzt sag mal, Speaker 1: da eine valide Aussage zu haben, müssten wir's wirklich selber mal Speaker 0: Nee, ist fein. Ich wollt auch nicht die Brücke widmen. Ich will nur sagen, das quasi der tragmatischer Ansatz. Was wollen die Worte? Speaker 2: Aber Genau. Speaker 0: Stimmen die das hin und wie schnell könnt ich die dafür ausbilden? Und am Ende Speaker 2: Ah ja, absolut. Speaker 0: Was bleibt, ist, dass wir denen die image zentralisierten Missionsplanungsdaten geben müssen. Wir müssen denen grundsätzlich die geben, wenn sie sie nicht selber haben. Und die Targetdaten, die haben wir ja, aber das müsste man denen auch irgendwie zur Verfügung stellen. Weil wenn's so kleine Ziele geht, dann muss der halt 'n bissel genauer ausgeplant werden als nur aufm Satz Picture. Wenn's auf gehärtete Ziele geht, dann ist das fair wie easy und relativ schnell geplant. Wenn man vor allem dann exploit, dass der in zweistelliger Food für fliegen kann. Speaker 2: Oh, ich Speaker 3: und ich meiner Facebook, ja? Das fängt jetzt ja Speaker 2: schon ganz gut aus dem Punkt. Wir alle wissen ja, dass sie die Brücke, dass sie die Brücke rausnehmen sollen. Ja, das ist klar, 'n bisschen mehr auch, was das am Ende bedeutet, ne. Wenn wenn dann dann hast Du, dann ist die Versorgung dieser so wichtig, nicht nur nicht nur militärisch, strategisch wichtigen, auch son bisschen politisch ist die, ist die gute Insel da ja ihr Herzstück. Jetzt nicht mehr ganz so ganz so fatal, wo sie ja quasi ihre Landbrücke mehr oder weniger dahin haben. Aber und und da hat man eben Angst, wenn da die direkte Links der Streitkräfte in die Ukraine geht. Und da wär halt dann immer die Frage, kann man im Grunde genommen den Trick pullllen, dass man dass man unsere Leute abstellt zur MBDA, das nur eine direct Klein zwischen MBDA und der Ukraine ist. Dann ist es weniger schlimm, wie wenn wenn die direct Klein unserer Sofappe zu ihnen ist, ja. Speaker 3: Oder wo Und ich Speaker 2: glaub, das macht Nein, Speaker 3: ich glaub, das macht keinen Unterschied, Also wir müssen halt aufpassen, dass wir nicht gleich zu Beginn im Zielkriterium formulieren. Und ich mein, wenn wir dem Minister jetzt sagen, ich überspitze mal 'n bisschen, wir planen die Daten und fahren die dann von Polen aus vom Auto rüber, damit keiner mitkriegt. Speaker 2: Das ist 'n Killkriterium. Ja, ja, ja. Speaker 3: Also wir werden das nicht schaffen, dass wir mit 1 irgendwie gearteten Beteiligung von uns das Ganze umsetzen. Speaker 2: Auch es Speaker 3: macht Also erst mal in dem, wenn wenn das von der Firma kommt, müsst ihr erst mal die MWDR dem ganzen zustimmen, ob Speaker 2: die das machen wollen. Ja, dann macht Speaker 3: das auch keinen Unterschied, ob wir unsere Leute in Büschelers planen lassen oder oder in Schrobenhausen. Beteiligt ist beteiligt. Und ich glaube, über die Hürde werden wir nicht rüberkommen. Ja, okay. Und dann jetzt noch mal Speaker 2: auf die auf die, wenn man Speaker 3: das mal als rote Linie, als Grundlage voraussetzen, dann kommen wir doch mal drauf zurück, was ich dann am Anfang meinte. Entweder wir müssen die Ausbildung aufteilen, dass wir sagen, wir machen einen Fast Track und einen Long Track und in den Long Track, dann sind die halt da 4 Monate und lernen es komplett richtig mit, wie mach ich's mit 'ner Brücke? Und in dem Fast Track geht es erst mal den schnellen Einsatz nach 2 Wochen, wie weiß ich, was ich mit dem Minitionsniveau mache? Oder die andere Option, wir fragen, ob in dieser Phase, bis die selber komplett komplett ausgebildet sind, fragen wir die Briten, ob's in der Phase übernehmen. Aber ich glaube, eine irgendwie geartete Versuch 1 Zwischenlösung, stell Speaker 2: dir mal vor, das kommt an Speaker 3: die Presse. Wir haben unseren Leute in Schrobenhausen oder wir fahren irgendwie mit dem Auto gespulen, sind, glaube ich, beides keine akzeptablen Lösungen. Man Man Speaker 2: man kann's natürlich so drehen, dass man sagt, also wenn der politische Wille jetzt mal da ist, dann müssen wir ja erst mal sagen, so, dann gehören wir 1 aus der Ukraine hier hinkommen. Ja. Und dann müssen wir mal wissen, ist der ist die politische Vorgabe keinerlei direkte Beteiligung mehr an der Missionsplanung? Dann muss klar sein, die Ausbildung dauert schon etwas länger. Und die Komplexität und auch am Ende der Einsatz erfolgt nimmt natürlich ab, aber ist auch nicht unmöglich. Weil ist ja nicht so, dass sie jetzt nicht schon eine gewisse Erfahrung darin gesammelt haben. Und wir sehen ja selber, was wir grade sonst alles für Hightech Ja. Zeug einsetzen. Und und und dann müsste man sehen, wenn wenn's die Vorgabe ist, es gibt hier keine direkte Beteiligung, wir können nicht die Missionsplanung in Büsche machen und sie rüberstecken. Da könnt ich mir fast vorstellen, dass das für Deutschland eine rote Linie ist. Ja, da muss halt klar sein, man muss ja etwas länger ausbilden, dann geht's halt 'n paar Monate. Und man kann auch nicht alles damit machen. Aber ist nicht so, dass man sagt, man kann nichts damit machen und man kann dann eher da
AXChristoforou
Posted - July 28, 2025 at 5:37 AM
Saved - July 28, 2025 at 8:14 PM

@AXChristoforou - Alex Christoforou

Ursula: LNG from the US is more "affordable and better" than pipeline gas from right next door. Europe is being destroyed, and it is deliberate. https://t.co/WTwIy4LHPP

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a three-year plan involving the purchase of 250 units per year. The speaker states that too much Russian LNG is entering the European Union through the back door, along with some Russian gas and oil. The goal is to eliminate Russian fossil fuels entirely from the European Union. Purchasing more affordable and better LNG from the United States is welcomed. The estimation is approximately 250 units per year over three years.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It is divided into three years. So during his term, 250 per year. And, indeed, we still have too much Russian LNG that is coming through the back door again to our European Union and some Russian gas and oil still in the European Union, which we do not want anymore. We want to absolutely get rid of Russian fossil fuels. And therefore, it is much welcome to purchase the more affordable and better LNG from The United States. And there, approximately, estimation is that we can do 250 per year over three years.
ricwe123
Posted - August 23, 2025 at 6:55 AM
Saved - August 23, 2025 at 12:44 PM

@ricwe123 - Richard

All the time Western mainstream media keeps telling us that the war in Ukraine was somehow "unprovoked" But then i listen to this leaked phone call between Victoria Nuland and Geoffrey Pyatt, and realize I was just listening to a carefully fabricated lie...... https://t.co/xqto4UFKzH

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss Klitschko piece as complicated electron, especially the announcement of him as deputy prime minister. 'I don't think cleats should go into the government. I don't think it's necessary. I don't think it's a good idea.' They debate keeping moderate Democrats together, with Yadze or Yatzenyuk as governing figure; 'He's the guy you know, what he needs is Klitsch and Tani Book on the outside.' 'Klitschko going in, he's gonna be at that level working for Yatzenyuk.' They consider reaching out to Klitschko directly to move fast and manage personality among the three, and to set up a 'three plus one conversation or three plus two with you.' Jeff Feltman mentions Robert Seri and that Seri could come in Monday or Tuesday with Ban Ki Moon's agreement; 'fuck the EU' as aim. They worry Russians will torpedo; plan outreach to Yanukovych; Biden's involvement: 'Biden's willing.'
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What do you think? Speaker 1: I think we're in play. The Klitschko piece is obviously the complicated electron here, especially the announcement of him as deputy prime minister. And and you've seen some of my notes on the troubles in the marriage right now. So we're trying to get a read really fast on where he is on this stuff. But I think your argument to him, which you'll need to make, I think that's the next phone call we wanna set up, is exactly the one you made to to Yat. And I I'm glad you sort of put him on the spot on where he fits in this scenario. And I'm very glad he said what he said in response. Speaker 0: Good. So I don't think cleats should go into the government. I don't think it's necessary. I don't think it's a good idea. Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, I I guess you think what in terms of him not going into the government, just let him sort of stay out and do his political homework and stuff. I'm just thinking in terms of sort of the process moving ahead, we wanna keep the moderate Democrats together. The problem is gonna be Tony Book and his guys. And, you know, I'm sure that's part of what Yanukovich is calculating on all of this. I kinda Speaker 0: I just I think Yadze is the guy who's got the economic experience, the governing experience. He's he's the guy you know, what he needs is Klitsch and Tani Book on the outside. He needs to be talking to them four times a week. You know? I I I just think Klitsch going in, he's gonna be at that level working for Yatzenyuk. It's just not gonna work. Speaker 1: Yeah. No. I think that's I think that's right. Okay. Good. Well, do you want us to try to set up a call with him as the next step? Speaker 0: My understanding from that call, but you tell me, was that the big three were going into their own meeting and that Yatz was gonna offer in that context a three way you know, the three plus one conversation or three plus two with you. Is that not how you understood it? Speaker 1: No. I think I mean, that's what he proposed. But I think just knowing the dynamic that's been with them where Klitschko has been the top dog, he's gonna take a while to show up for whatever meeting they've got. He's probably talking to his guys at this point. So I think you reaching out directly to him helps with the personality management among the three, and it and it gives you also a chance to move fast on all this stuff and put us behind it behind it before they all sit down and he, he explains why he doesn't like it. Speaker 0: Okay. Good. I'm happy. Why don't you reach out to him and see if he wants to talk before or after? Speaker 1: Okay. Will do. Thanks. Speaker 0: Okay. I've now written oh, one more wrinkle for you, Jeff. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: Can't remember if I told you this or if I only told Washington this, that when I talked to Jeff Feltman this morning, he had a new name for the UN guy, Robert Seri. Did I write you that this morning? Speaker 1: Yeah. I saw that. Speaker 0: He's now gotten both Seri and Ban Ki Moon to agree that Seri could come in Monday or Tuesday. Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 0: So that would be great, I think, to help glue this thing and have the UN help glue it and, you know, fuck the EU. Speaker 1: No. Exactly. And I think we've gotta do something to make it stick together because you can be pretty sure that if it does if it does start to gain altitude, the Russians will be working behind the scenes to try to torpedo it. And, again, the fact that this is out there right now, I'm still trying to figure out in my mind why Yanukovych that. But in the meantime, there's a party of regions faction meeting going on right now, and I'm sure there's a lively argument going on in that group at this point. But, anyway, we could we could land jelly set up on this one if we move fast. So let me work on let me work on Klitschko. And if you can just keep I I think we wanna try to get somebody with an international personality to come out here and help to midwife this thing. And then the other the other issue is some kind of outreach to Yanukovych, but we probably regroup on that tomorrow as we see how things start to fall into place. Speaker 0: So on that piece, Jeff, when I wrote the note, Sullivan's come back to me, VFR, saying you need Biden. And I said probably tomorrow for an attaboy and get the deets to stick. So Biden's willing. Speaker 1: Okay. Great. Thanks.
SputnikInt
Posted - September 27, 2025 at 2:11 PM
Saved - September 28, 2025 at 7:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
This week marks the third anniversary of the Nord Stream bombings, a significant sabotage of energy infrastructure. Nord Stream consists of four underwater pipelines transporting Russian gas to Europe, crucial for Germany's energy needs. The U.S. opposed the project from the start, fearing it would strengthen Russian influence. Following the explosions in September 2022, investigations by Germany, Denmark, and Sweden have faced criticism for lack of transparency. Reports suggest U.S. involvement, while a Ukrainian national has been arrested in connection with the attacks, denying any wrongdoing.

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

NORD STREAM SABOTAGE: WHO DID IT AND WHY? This week marked the third anniversary of the Nord Stream bombings, the biggest and most geopolitically significant sabotage attack on energy infrastructure in modern history 🧵 https://t.co/Wzzhtzwjvd

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

1️⃣ WHAT IS NORD STREAM? A network of 4 underwater pipelines for pumping Russian gas to Europe, two apiece via Nord Stream 1 & 2 🔸Nord Stream 1 was inaugurated in late 2011 🔸Nord Stream 2 was finished in late 2021, but never launched amid US pressure on Germany over certification

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

2️⃣ CAPACITY & SIGNIFICANCE 🔸Nord Stream offered Germany up to 110 BCM of gas per year, enough to cover all its needs & turn it into a regional energy hub 🔸It gave Russia a direct energy route to Central Europe, bypassing Eastern European governments eager to use transit as leverage

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

3️⃣ CONFLICTING INTERESTS Fearing the melding of Russia’s vast resources with German industry, & eager to sell its own, more expensive LNG to Europe, the US opposed Nord Stream from the start The Merkel government, in office until late 2021, strongly supported it https://t.co/HFQeMZq9Dm

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

4️⃣ FROM US OPPOSITION 🔸Nord Stream I was opposed by the Bush & Obama administrations before and during construction 🔸In 2019, Trump imposed sanctions on Nord Stream II, with his State Department claiming it would “undermine” Europe’s energy security https://t.co/5RdOKeePZ3

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

5️⃣ TO US THREATS 🔸In February 2022, two weeks before Russia kicked off its special military operation in Ukraine, President Biden said that if Russian “tanks or troops cross[ed] the border,” the United States would “bring an end” to Nord Stream 2 He didn’t elaborate how https://t.co/8HES8ioX4I

Video Transcript AI Summary
During a discussion on Nord Stream 2, the speaker states: "If Germany if, if Russia invades, that means tanks or troops crossing the, the the border of Ukraine, again, then, there will be, we there will be no longer a Nord Stream two." "We we will bring an end to it." He is asked, "What do what how will you how will you do that exactly since the project and control of the project is within Germany's control?" The response: "We will I promise you we'll be able to do it." The passage ties a potential Russian invasion to the termination of Nord Stream 2 and asserts the ability to end the project despite German governance.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If Germany if, if Russia invades, that means tanks or troops crossing the, the the border of Ukraine, again, then, there will be, we there will be no longer a Nord Stream two. We we will bring an end to it. What do what how will you how will you do that exactly since the project and control of the project is within Germany's control? We will I promise you we'll be able to do it.

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

6️⃣ SABOTAGE TIMELINE On September 26, 2022, at 2:03 am & 7:03 pm local time, seismic monitoring stations in Denmark, Sweden, and Germany picked up signs of underwater explosions 3 of the network’s 4 pipelines were hit, 80M below the Baltic Sea, in Denmark’s exclusive economic zone

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

7️⃣ BIGGEST ATTACK OF ITS KIND Putin called the attack an “Anglo-Saxon” plot to destroy “Europe’s entire energy infrastructure” Russia’s Prosecutor General launched a case, treating it as international terrorism The bombings caused the largest human-caused methane release in history

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

8️⃣ EUROPE’S CLOWNSHOW PROBES Germany, Denmark & Sweden began separate investigations. Moscow slammed them for foot-dragging & refusal to cooperate with Russia Denmark & Sweden inexplicably closed their probes in 2024 without publicizing results. Germany’s investigation continues

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

9️⃣ HERSH’S BOMBSHELL In March 2023, veteran investigative journalist Sy Hersh reported that the Nord Stream attacks were carried out by US Navy divers with Norwegian support, personally authorized by President Biden, & planned with support from the CIA https://t.co/FBvYhRmms6

Video Transcript AI Summary
Johnson's premise for expanding the war and getting congressional commitment to do whatever he wanted in the war—"the Tonkin Gulf resolution in the congress passed after after Johnson lied about what happened in the war." He "invented a a North Vietnamese attack," and the war killed 58,000 Americans and "anywhere between one and three million Vietnamese." "That's the way we deal with these people of a different race, I guess." What's gonna happen now? "Germany, in late September last year, it was clear that whatever we thought about Ukraine winning the war or standing up to the Russians was gonna be very unlikely." Putin is telling Western Europe and the Germans, particularly the Germans, that "we value we're so worried that you might decide not to support us all the way because you're getting oil from Russia." "They controlled the pipeline, as I said, the Germans." So what he did is he said to Europe and Western, "you can't in a crunch, you know, we're gonna let you be cold." "It's not cold this year, but the real worry is next winter."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What happened in Norway, the reason I wrote the piece of suck substack talk going back to Lyndon Johnson, we all know that Johnson's premise for go expanding the war and getting congressional commitment to do whatever he wanted in the war. The same as the the one that George Bush got after nine eleven that led him to go to Iraq. He could do what he wanted. He got a complete bill of goods, rights, front in in a speech called the Tonkin Gulf resolution in the congress passed after after Johnson lied about what happened in the war. He invented a a North Vietnamese attack. He and MacDamara conspired to change the intelligence. It's not this is not new. It's been known. But I used I'm I'm I was thinking of that in the context of Johnson lied about something that led us into a war that killed 58,000 Americans and get this, anywhere between one and three million Vietnamese. We don't know. That's that's the way we deal with the with these people of a different race, I guess, one to 3,000,000. And so here we have a president's line about a not telling truth about something he authorized that did happen. And what's gonna happen now? Germany, I think the reason for it, I think in late September last year, it was clear that whatever we thought about Ukraine winning the war or standing up to the Russians was gonna be very unlikely, which it is going to be very unlikely despite what you read in the daily newspapers. It's not going well at all. So Putin is telling Western Europe and the Germans, particularly the Germans, that, well, we value we're so worried that you might decide not to support us all the way because you're getting oil from Russia. They controlled the pipeline, as I said, the Germans. He was worried they would drop the sanctions and start taking the gas again. So what he did is is he said to Europe and Western, well, you can't in a crunch, you know, we're gonna let you be cold. It's not cold this year, but I will tell you right now, the real worry is next winter.

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

🔟 DISTRACTION ACTION Several weeks later, legacy US & German media began issuing their own stories, citing unnamed intelligence officials, claiming the attacks were carried out by a ragtag group of Ukrainians using a rented yacht, & that NATO didn’t know. Russia didn’t buy it. https://t.co/lFdEBOJmlh

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

1️⃣1️⃣ BLAME THE PATSY In August 2025, Ukrainian national Sergey Kuznetsov was arrested in Italy on a German warrant in connection with the attacks. His extradition is before Italy’s Supreme Court Kuznetsov denies the charges & claims he was in Ukraine at the time of the attacks https://t.co/h5Tz77S9Xj

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

1️⃣2️⃣ PUTIN HINTS WHO DID IT In his 2024 interview with Tucker Carlson, Russia’s president revealed who he suspects is behind Nord Stream’s destruction, saying it required both the motivation & the capabilities to pull off, & hinting CIA involvement https://t.co/hRLy38EhN9

Video Transcript AI Summary
“Who blew up Nord Stream?” “You for sure.” “I did not blow up Nord Stream.” “In the war of propaganda, it is very difficult to defeat The United States because The United States controls all the world’s media and many European media.” “The ultimate beneficiary beneficiary of the biggest European media are American financial institutions.” “We can simply shine the spotlight on our sources of information, and we will not achieve results.” “Germany leadership is guided by the interests of the collective West rather than its national interests.” “There are two gas routes through Ukraine.” “Open the second route and please get gas from Russia.” “The world is breaking into two hemispheres.” “The head is split in two parts, it is an illness.” “The dollar is the cornerstone of The United States power.” “USD transactions down from about 80% of Russian foreign trade to 13%.” “34% of our transactions are made in rubles, and about as much a little over 34% in yuan.” “Cooperation with China keeps increasing.” “The pace at which China’s cooperation with Europe is growing is higher and greater than that of the growth of Chinese Russian cooperation.” “Before introducing any illegitimate sanctions, illegitimate in terms of the charter of the United Nations, one should think very carefully.” “Ask Europeans, aren’t they afraid?”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who blew up Nord Stream? Speaker 1: You for sure. Speaker 0: I was busy that day. Nate, do you have do you Speaker 1: I did not blow up Nord Speaker 0: Stream. Thank you, though. Speaker 1: Who was You personally may have an alibi, but the CIA has no such alibi. Speaker 0: Did you have evidence that NATO or the CIA did it? Speaker 1: You know, I won't get into details, but people always say in such cases, look for someone who is interested. But in this case, we should not only look for someone who is interested, but also for someone who has capabilities. Because there may be many people interested, but not all of them are capable of sinking to the bottom of the Baltic Sea and carrying out this explosion. These two components should be connected. Who is interested and who is capable of doing it? Speaker 0: But I'm confused. I mean, that's the biggest act of industrial terrorism ever, and it's the largest emission of c o two in in history. Okay. So if you had evidence and presumably given your security services or intel services, you would, that NATO, The US, CIA, the West did this. Why wouldn't you present it and win a propaganda victory? Speaker 1: In the war of propaganda, it is very difficult to defeat The United States because The United States controls all the world's media and many European media. The ultimate beneficiary beneficiary of the biggest European media are American financial institutions. Don't you know that? So it is possible to get involved in this work, but it is cost prohibitive, so to speak. We can simply shine the spotlight on our sources of information, and we will not achieve results. It is clear to the whole world what happened, and even American analysts talk about it directly. It's true. Speaker 0: Yes. Here's a question you may be to answer. You worked in Germany, famously. The Germans clearly know that their NATO partner did this, but they and it damaged their economy greatly. It may never recover. Why are they being silent about it? That's very confusing to me. Why wouldn't the Germans say something about Speaker 1: it? This also confuses me. But today's German leadership is guided by the interests of the collective West rather than its national interests. Otherwise, it is difficult to explain the logic of their action or inaction. After all, it is not only about Nord Stream one, which was blown up, and the Nord Stream 2 was damaged, but one pipe is safe and sound and gas can be supplied to Europe through it. But Germany does not open it. We are ready, please. There is another route through Poland called Yamal Europe, which also allows for large flow. Poland has closed it, but Poland pecks from the German hand, It receives money from the Pan European funds, and Germany is the main donor to these Pan European funds. Germany feeds Poland to the certain extent, and they closed their route to Germany. Why? I don't understand. Ukraine to which the Germans supply weapons and give money. Germany is the second sponsor of The United States in terms of financial aid to Ukraine. There are two gas routes through Ukraine. They simply closed one route to Ukrainians. Open the second route and please get gas from Russia. They do not open it. Why don't the Germans say? Look, guys, we give you money and weapons. Open up the valve, please. Let the gas from Russia pass through for us. We are buying liquified gas at exorbitant prices in Europe, which brings the level of our competitiveness and economy in general down to zero. Do you want us to give you money? Let us have the decent existence, make money for our economy because this is where the money we give you comes from. They refuse to do so. Why? Ask them. That is what is like in their heads. Those are highly incompetent people. Speaker 0: Well, maybe the world is breaking into two hemispheres, one with cheap energy, the other without, and I wanna ask you that. If if we're now a multipolar world, obviously we are, can you describe the blocks of alliances? Who who who is in each side, do Speaker 1: you think? Listen. You have said that the world is breaking into two hemispheres. A human brain is divided into two hemispheres. One is responsible for one type of activities, the other one is more about creativity and so on. But it is still one and the same head. The world should be a single whole. Security should be shared rather than a meant for the golden billion. That is the only scenario where the world could be stable, sustainable and predictable. Until then, while the head is split in two parts, it is an illness, a serious adverse condition. It is a period of severe disease that the world is going through now. But I think that thanks to honest journalism, this work is akin to work of the doctors, this could somehow be remedied. Speaker 0: Well, let's just give one example. The the US dollar, which has kind of united the world in a lot of ways, maybe not to your advantage, but certainly ours. Is that going away as the reserve currency, the common the universally accepted currency? How have sanctions, do you think, changed the dollar's place in the world? Speaker 1: You know, to use the dollar as a tool of foreign policy struggle is one of the biggest strategic mistakes made by The US political leadership. The dollar is the cornerstone of The United States power. I think everyone understands very well that no matter how many dollars are printed, they are quickly dispersed all over the world. Inflation in The United States is minimal. It's about three or 3.4%, which is, I think, totally acceptable for The US. But they won't stop printing. What does the debt of $33,000,000,000,000 tell us about? It is about the emission. Nevertheless, it is the main weapon used by The United States to preserve its power across the world. As soon as the political leadership decided to use the US dollar as a tool of political struggle, a blow was dealt to this American power. I would not like to use any strong language, but it is a stupid thing to do and a grave mistake. Look at what is going on in the world. Even The United States allies are now downsizing their dollar reserves. Seeing this, everyone starts looking for ways to protect themselves. But the fact that The United States applies restrictive measures to certain countries, such as placing restrictions on transactions, freezing assets, etcetera, causes great concern and sends a signal to the whole world. What did we have here? Until 2022, about 80% of Russian foreign trade transactions were made in US dollars and euros. US dollars accounted for approximately 50% of our transactions with third countries, while currently it is down to 13%. It wasn't us who banned the use of the US dollar. We had no such intention. It was decision of The United States to restrict our transactions in US dollars. I think it is complete foolishness from the point of view of the interest of The United States itself and its taxpayers, as it damages The US economy, undermines the power of The United States across the world. By the way, our transactions in yuan accounted for about 3%. Today, 34% of our transactions are made in rubles, and about as much a little over 34% in yuan. Why did The United States do this? My only guess is self conceived. They probably thought it would lead to full collapse, but nothing collapsed. Moreover, other countries, including oil producers, are thinking of and already accepting payments for oil in Yuan. Do you even realize what is going on or not? Does anyone in The United States realize this? What are you doing? You're cutting yourself off. All experts say this. Ask any intelligent and thinking person in The United States what the dollar means for The US. But you're killing it with your own hands. Speaker 0: I think that's a fair I I think that's a fair assessment. The question is what comes next. And maybe you trade one colonial power for another much less sentimental and forgiving colonial power. I mean, is the the BRICS, for example, in danger of being completely dominated by the Chinese, the Chinese economy, in a way that's not good for their sovereignty? Do you worry about that? Speaker 1: We have heard those boogeyman stories before. It is a boogeyman story. We're neighbors with China. You cannot choose neighbors just as you cannot choose close relatives. We share a border of thousand kilometers with them. This is number one. Second, we have a centuries long history of coexistence. We're used to it. Third, China's foreign policy philosophy is not aggressive. Its idea is to always look for compromise, and we can see that. The next point is as follows. We are always told the same boogeyman story, and here it goes again, through an euphemistic form, but it is still the same boogeyman story. The cooperation with China keeps increasing. The pace at which China's cooperation with Europe is growing is higher and greater than that of the growth of Chinese Russian cooperation. Ask Europeans, aren't they afraid? They might be, I don't know. But they are still trying to access China's market at all costs, especially now that they are facing economic problems. Chinese businesses are also exploring the European market. Do Chinese businesses have small presence in The United States? Yes. The political decisions are such that they are trying to limit their cooperation with China. It is to your own detriment, mister Tucker, that you are limiting cooperation with China. You are hurting yourself. It is a delicate matter, and there are no silver bullet solutions, just as it is with the dollar. Before introducing any illegitimate sanctions, illegitimate in terms of the charter of the United Nations, one should think very carefully. For decision makers, this appears to be a problem.
View Full Interactive Feed