reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@GuntherEagleman - Gunther Eagleman™
They are coming for us. 👇🏼https://t.co/En8wnEjnnX
Video Transcript AI Summary
There is concern about a soft coup happening, where new laws are being created under the pretext of pandemic preparedness. The World Health Organization (WHO) is developing a pandemic treaty that would remove human rights protections and enforce surveillance, censorship, and a single narrative. The treaty would also allow for vaccines to be developed in just 100 days. Amendments to existing regulations would make these changes enforceable and provide a liability shield, remove intellectual property rights, enforce digital passports, and give the WHO director general the power to declare a pandemic without standards. The WHO would also dictate which drugs can be used during a pandemic. Additionally, the concept of One Health aims to give the WHO jurisdiction over everything by linking climate change, animals, plants, water systems, and ecosystems to health, while devaluing humans compared to animals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're undergoing a soft coup, and the idea is to create a whole new set of laws and ignore the existing human rights laws and other laws under the pretext of pandemic preparedness and the biosecurity agenda. The WHO is developing through all its nations, but with the WHO director, the United States in charge, a pandemic treaty and amendments to the existing international health regulations that will remove the human rights protections currently, embedded in the IHRs will enforce surveillance censorship, get rid of freedom of speech, require governments to censor and only push a single narrative. Also we will be subject, if they can make this work, to vaccines developed in a 100 days, which the organization CEPI is planning to do, and one of the people who founded CEPI was Jeremy Farrar, who is now the chief scientists at the WHO to bring this forward. Other things that amendments do is to bind the states there are no longer recommendations but enforceable edicts. Provide a liability shield, get rid of intellectual property rights, move supplies from 1 country to another, enforce digital passports, and the director general of who can demand that a pandemic or a potential pandemic exists, he can just declare it with no standards, and then countries around the world will have to obey.
Also the who will tell you what drugs you can and can't use in your nation once a pandemic is declared. Obviously, the budget will increase. One Health is another part of this. One Health is a concept that was created to enable the WHO, with these documents, to take over jurisdiction of everything in the world by saying that climate change, animals, plants, water systems, ecosystems are all central to health. Also embedded in this concept is a peculiar notion that humans are no longer of greater value than animals.
@StacySharko2 - StacySharko2.0 ❤️🇺🇸🇺🇸❤️🦈
@JackStr42679640 This… https://t.co/ELC3f56huY
Video Transcript AI Summary
If you possess a small amount of crack cocaine, even as small as a quarter, you will be sentenced to 5 years in jail without any chance of probation. The law, passed by Senator Thurman and myself, allows the government to seize all your possessions, including your car, house, and bank account. It doesn't matter why someone becomes a sociopath; our duty is to isolate them from society. They need to be in jail, away from our loved ones. We shouldn't question their motives, but rather focus on removing them from the streets.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you have a piece of crack cocaine no bigger than this quarter that I'm holding in my hand, 1 quarter of $1. We passed a law through the leadership of senator Thurman and myself and others. A law that says, you're caught with that, you go to jail for 5 years. You get no probation. You get nothing other than 5 years in jail.
Judge doesn't have a choice. Under our forfeiture statutes, you can, the government can, take everything you own, Everything from your car to your house, your bank account, not merely what they confiscate in terms of the dollars from the transaction that you just got caught engaging in. They can take everything. I don't care why they've become a sociopath. We have an obligation to cordon them off from the rest of society.
They are in jail away from my mother, your husband, our families. So I don't wanna ask What made them do this? They must be taken off the street.
@BIPOCracism - BIPOC Doing Racism
They hate you so much https://t.co/7nhkQJMrYB
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the origins of white people and argues that they are not a separate species from other races. They explain that white people have genetic variations that result in characteristics such as pale skin, straight hair, and blue eyes. The speaker also mentions that white people have a higher susceptibility to certain diseases and addictions due to their genetic makeup. They conclude that white people are mutants who originated in Central Asia and migrated to Europe.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: European. They asked the question, where did the white man come from? So I know that, brother brother said he said, you know, the white man was something different. And a lot of people say that, and and they gotta you know, that's cool. People should feel like that.
But here's the thing, the white man is a degenerate, deviant, Homosapien, sapien, same species that we are. Let me tell me and this is what science says. Show and prove is when you mix a lion with a tiger, you get a liger. Right? Yes.
Now we understand the pantheal family, both of the families that they come from, the feline family, but they're different subspecies. A male liger can't reproduce. He's sterile. That's right. Mighty Conde, you're a x like a donkey.
Right? Right. Like a donkey. Now when a white man breed with a black woman or a black woman breed or a black man breed with a white woman, look at Obama. He's not sterile.
That shows that they're not a separate species. They have 46 chromosomes just like us, but at the demi level, this is where you find the difference between us and them. They have a high level of what we refer to as, SARA, which is a high level of depression, which makes them more violent, brutal, and more more fucked up. That's why they act the way they act. That's a gene.
That's a gene variant. That's the SARA gene we're talking about. He got a higher level. A higher level. And also people that's been prone to war.
That's right. Also, SLC 2485. Sodium potassium exchange of 55, which gives them pale skin. That developed in Central Asia. Also, Adderlocust, ectoplasmic receptor, which gives them that straight hair.
So they are the same species as us, but they are degenerate. Also, 3 to 4% of their DNA, which in the human leukotanogen, which is their immunity, is Neanderthal. You can tell because they able to deal with the cold weather from the high level of cruelty in their skin. The the thick texture of their skin to deal with cold weather. You know, you're gonna do with something like that.
They're mutants. I'll give them mutants. Here's another thing. They also have, when you break it down at the dimmy level, that 4% stretches out at 70% in their skin. So they are the same species.
They're just degenerate. If they wasn't the same species, we wouldn't be able to reproduce. And like people like Obama, Lenny Kravitz, all these guys would be sterile like the lighter. That's what making the same species. They're just degenerates.
They're mutants. Because they mix and archaic humans like Neanderthal, which gives them a high level of osteosclerosis, autoimmunity disorders, Certain types of lupusis, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes. White people are have more problem with type 1 diabetes being born with it than black people catching type 2 from eating high carbs, sugar, and all that other crap. White people have more levels of type 1 diabetes than anybody because of the neonathology, and you can look this up. They also changed.
They they addicted. They get addicted to shit quick. That addiction is due to the Neanderthal gene variant because Neanderthals were very mimicky. They were they were they were kinda like, They they Fox b two genes was fucked up. They had grown up with chromosome 7.
So they all like us. They are humans, but we all have a difference between us. The The levels of melanin is not your melanin like ours. It's Phil Melon. And it it failed, and it's called Spurs.
It's 1 cell away from albinism. SLC two four eight five is 1 cell away from albinism. OCA 2 or Hart 2, Alcantade and Shramps 2, which give them blue eyes, Show the degeneracy of what they come from. So they are mutants that come out of Central Asia that went into Europe. That's where the European
@CollenSebake - Collen sebake
@l42022425 This is what they also do https://t.co/gklFl8fOYn
Video Transcript AI Summary
Oprah's favorite miracle fountain of youth and magic wrinkle cure is a red substance made from growth hormones extracted from human foreskin. When applied to the skin, wrinkles disappear and the hand becomes unable to ball up. The speaker leaves the plasma on their skin for a day, washes it off the next day, and experiences an amazing smooth glow. They plan to continue using this product indefinitely.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So this is one of Oprah's favorites. She says it's a miracle fountain of youth and her magic wrinkle cure. So I'm gonna put a little on your hand.
Speaker 1: I'll do that. Oprah did it.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Oprah did it. Alright. So here, we're gonna rub her right in.
Speaker 1: How come it's red? What's
Speaker 0: I I'll show you in a sec, Steve. So this is made from growth hormones of human
Speaker 1: Look. The wrinkles has just disappeared. I can't even ball my hand up.
Speaker 0: But so it's made from human foreskin.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, Steve. It is an extraction from a, a a, a piece of Skin, that came from a young person, far, far away, and they Somehow figured out how to extract its foreskin from a Korean baby. That's what it is. I You know? I leave the plasma on my skin for a day and then wash Shut off the next day.
It gives me the most amazing smooth glow. I'm going to continue to do this forever.
@JackStr42679640 - Jack Straw
The panic is real 🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/Wd2AuusmQa
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions whether Chairman Comer has proven Joe Biden committed high crimes. He believes Biden should be impeached but is unsure why the vote has not been called yet. The discussion revolves around the lack of evidence for impeachment and the delay in taking action. The speaker accuses the hearings of being a show and states that the vote will never happen due to insufficient evidence. The conversation ends with frustration over the ongoing hearings without a clear resolution in sight.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Over here. How are you doing? Good. So I I just have a question. We've been at this for 15 months now in oversight.
I know this is your first time here. But do you think Chairman Comer has proven that Joe Biden has committed a high crime and misdemeanor?
Speaker 1: I believe with all the evidence he's gathered, yes, he's proven that Joe Biden has committed high crimes and misdemeanors.
Speaker 0: Okay. And so I assume you believe Joe Biden should be impeached?
Speaker 1: Well, that's up to you guys.
Speaker 0: But do you believe he should be impeached? It's yes or no. I personally believe Yeah. Yeah. You.
Under
Speaker 1: No. Because I know that he committed high crimes and misdemeanors. Okay. I was involved and saw them happen.
Speaker 0: Right. But, obviously, with all the evidence, you must believe that all of these hearings for 15 months that the chairman has proven that. Right?
Speaker 1: You re ask the question?
Speaker 0: Sure. I'll I'll sum it up. I assume you believe he'll should be impeached, But my my point is, is that the chairman has not yet moved for that. And so, look, chairman, we got we got like 3 and a half minutes here. I mean, let's just do the impeachment.
I mean, why continue to waste 1,000,000 of dollars of the taxpayers' money if we're going to impeach because you believe you've shown he's committed a high crime and misdemeanor? Let what are you waiting on? Let let's just do it. I mean, by the way, we got chairman Jordan here also. The double chairman, why aren't you guys calling for the vote in your committee?
When when is it gonna happen? When when can we tell the American people you're gonna stop wasting their money and just call for the vote on impeachment? Gentlemen, you gentleman, you? Sure.
Speaker 2: We don't do snap impeachments like you guys. We actually do the facts. We do oversight according
Speaker 0: to the Constitution. Never gonna call for it. You're never gonna call for it.
Speaker 2: I mean Well, now you can predict you can predict the future?
Speaker 0: How do you know? You don't you guys only have 6 more months probably in power, right, until the election. So are you gonna you gonna do it in 2 months? Are you gonna do it in 3 months? Like, tell the American people Does the constitution put
Speaker 2: a time limit on oversight? I don't think I didn't I didn't read that in the constitution.
Speaker 0: So you if you believe you don't you don't can't call for the impeachment now, then what you're admitting is you haven't yet proven that he's committed a high crime and misdemeanor. You haven't proven it yet. Otherwise, you would call for it, I assume. We're doing our work. Okay.
So so they haven't proven it. Right? They haven't proven he committed a high crime and misdemeanor. Otherwise, we would call for impeachment. So I just look.
You know, the chairman knows me well. I mean, I'm just here to help him. Right? And so I just think we should do it today. Let's just call for it.
I'll I'll make the motion, mister chairman. I wanna help you out. You can second it. Right? Like, make the motion to impeach President Biden.
Go ahead. It's your turn. You second it. No. Nothing.
Okay. We got nothing. So I want it, with my last couple of minutes, show the American people that they're never gonna impeach Joe Biden. It's never gonna happen because they don't have the evidence. Okay?
This is a show. It's all fake. They just wanna do these hearings. It's not leading to impeachment. They're lying to their base on Newsmax and Fox, leading these people to believe that they're gonna eventually impeach the president.
It's not gonna happen at all, ever. Period. They don't even have the votes even if they had it in committee. They don't have the votes on the floor. They know that.
They got members resigning rather than taking a vote on the fake faux impeachment. Just ask Ken Buck, who said the speaker ain't gonna get me to take an unconstitutional impeachment vote. I mean, boy. I mean, so, look. I mean, if these hearings if these hearings were a success, right, if if what we've been doing for the last 15 months had convinced the American people that Joe Biden committed a high crime and misdemeanor, you can be damn sure they would have called the vote by now.
Right? But they wanted to go on. They well, they either wanted to go on because they don't have the evidence
Speaker 1: Are you asking me a question? No.
Speaker 0: No. I'm just looking at you.
Speaker 1: Oh, okay.
Speaker 0: But but we if you wanna talk me, we can talk. Well, no.
Speaker 1: I think you haven't read, recent data that shows the American people are well aware of the Biden's corruption.
Speaker 0: Perfect. So then ask the chairman why he hasn't called for impeachment, When is the vote gonna happen? I mean, I you believe it. He believes it. He says it every day on TV.
I just don't know when we're gonna have the vote. I mean, just let's let's just go.
Speaker 2: Let me
Speaker 1: Are you asking me to hold the vote for you?
Speaker 0: No. I just like looking at you. We we can save we can save the taxpayers 1,000,000 of dollars. So, I mean, look, I used all of my time to show that this vote is never going to happen, because they have no evidence on Joe Biden. I yield back.
Bill Deck.
@LynkLuv - Jenna Fredo
@MarioNawfal Yikes. 😳 https://t.co/zh9F05nLu4
Video Transcript AI Summary
They are having a blast like in the movie "48 Hours" with Usher for the next 48 hours. Usher was under the speaker's guardianship during his first album. They plan to go wild and get grills in the next 48 hours.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Seen the movie 48 hours. Right now, he's having 48 hours with Diddy, him and his boy. They're having the times of their lives, like like like, you know, where we hanging out and what we doing. We we can't really disclose, but, it's definitely a 15 year old's dream. You know, I I have been given custody of him.
You know, he signed to Usher.
Speaker 1: I'm signed to
Speaker 0: I I had legal guardianship of Usher when when, you know, he he did his first album. I did Usher's first album. I don't really I don't have legal guardianship of him, but for the next 48 hours, he's with me. So, and, yeah, and and we're gonna go full, buck full crazy.
Speaker 1: We're going crazy.
Speaker 0: Crazy.
Speaker 1: I'm taking this out tonight.
Speaker 0: What you wanna do? What you wanna do over the next 48 hours? Hours?
Speaker 1: 48 hours. Let's go, are we gonna let's just go get some grills. Let's go and get some grills.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
They. Want. You. Dead. https://t.co/QaHNsFbiv7
Video Transcript AI Summary
We forgot to mention that whoever brings back assassinating presents needs to have good aim. Genies can be tricky like that.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Think we forgot to mention when we were asking for, you know, someone to bring back assassinating presents like they used to, we forgot to mention that they have to have good aim. Remember, genies are tricky that way.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
There must be some reason they're hiding this from us.... https://t.co/gTnDPwTnHE
Video Transcript AI Summary
Antarctica is more mysterious than we think. In 1912, Captain Robert Scott's expedition mapped the South Pole before tourism restrictions. Official photos showed a barren landscape, but leaked photos reveal hidden ancient ruins, statues, and pyramids of a lost civilization.
Shortly after taking these photos, Scott and his team died on their return journey, and a search party recovered the images. Some claim the photos are fake, but ancient maps depict a green Antarctica.
Antarctica, twice the size of Australia, was likely ice-free 6,000 years ago. It's hard to believe ancient humans explored every continent but skipped a green Antarctica. Photos confirm a pyramid-like structure under the snow, verified by satellite footage. Is it a natural formation or something more?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Antarctica is a lot different than you think. Videos like this painted as a barren yet beautiful land of ice and snow, but apparently there are leaked photos that show us they're trying to cover up something big down there. Back in 1912, Captain Robert Scott led an expedition to the South Pole to map it out and take some pictures. This was forty seven years before the Antarctic Treaty of 1959, which heavily restricted tourist travel to the majority of Antarctica for your own safety, of course. Now, these were the photos released by National Geographic of the expedition.
Just some family friendly fun adventure. Right? But apparently, that was just the tip. And if you know me, I do not like just the tip. Story goes, Robert Scott and his team went down there to map the South Pole.
And these are the photos they took, which were hidden from the public and apparently recently got leaked. Ancient ruins, statues, and even what looked like pyramids of some long lost civilization that they don't want anyone to know about. And the crazy part is, in March of nineteen twelve, just two months after these photos were taken, Robert and his whole team died on their journey back home due to starvation and extreme cold. And these photos got later recovered by some search party that found them. Now doubters will tell you these photos are fake because Google told them, but even ancient maps painted Antarctica as green.
And this map from 1512 even shows South America connecting to the Antarctic shoreline with incredible accuracy. Antarctica is twice the size of Australia and was thought to be ice free as recently as six thousand years ago. And we're supposed to believe ancient humans managed to find their way around every single continent in the world, even discovering the microscopic islands of the Pacific Ocean. And somehow, they just fully skipped Antarctica, even when it was a luscious green paradise. A lot of people argue these ancient ruins aren't real, and who knows?
But you gotta keep an open mind. Right? But what are confirmed real are these photos of what looks like a pyramid hidden under the snow in Antarctica. There are many photos that prove it exists and even professors admit it. And obviously the Google debunkers will tell you, oh, it's a natural mountain formation, form three erosion, but I don't know what kind of looking ass mountains are cut this perfect.
Even satellite footage confirms it, so I don't know. You think there's something down there or are we the trippy ones?
@SaltyGoat17 - SaltyGoat
Watch this!!👇🏻 How terrified are these people right now?😎 https://t.co/rHesNRk2pu
Video Transcript AI Summary
They accuse us of what they're doing. These intelligence officials, the same ones who misled America, are worried about a second Trump term? They helped bury the Hunter Biden laptop story before the 2020 election. That laptop could have changed history.
Now they claim Trump will weaponize the spy services. If Trump wins, I want them investigated for election interference. Joe Biden should be the first target. We need to expose them to the same rules they impose on us.
They stole the election, and we can't just move on. They hid the laptop information. The deep state is real—media members, intelligence community members, both active and retired, and government bureaucrats. The deep state sabotaged the Trump administration before, and they're still here.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Folks, they always accuse you of what they're doing. And because they're terrified that their tyranny is not gonna continue if Donald Trump wins, they're now doing this simple distraction technique that has appealed to useful idiots for a long time and been used by commies, social ists, Soviets. They've used it forever. They just blame you for exactly what they're doing.
Speaker 1: Politico recently spoke with former intelligence officials about how on edge the idea of a second Trump term makes all of them.
Speaker 0: Are you freaking kidding me? Are these the same 51 intelligence officers who falsely bullshitted America? These scumbags, scumbags, every single one of them. You hear me? Absolute scumbags.
You don't like the word? Too bad. That's what you are. A bunch of scumbag fuckwads. Fuck you guys.
Fuck you guys. 51 of you pieces of shit. Who told America before an election. 50 former national intelligence folks who said that what this he's accusing me of is a Russian plan.
Speaker 2: During the campaign season, you want to be able to understand everything that the Russians might do.
Speaker 0: This laptop that would have changed the entire course of American history, would have kept the border closed if Trump got reelected, probably wouldn't be a Russian invasion in Ukraine, probably wouldn't have been an October either. We'd be living in a different world right now because you 51 intelligence scumbags, knowing you were full of shit the whole time, now you dare. You've got the balls to say that Trump could weaponize the spy services. I'm demanding an investigation if Trump wins into all of these people for a conspiracy to interfere in an election and potentially worse. And Joe Biden's gonna be the first target of that investigation.
You will never ever teach these people that deep state lawfare is wrong without exposing them to the same sets of rules they want to impose on us. Someone did steal an election, and Joe Biden was a field general in that war on election integrity. Listen to me. I want an investigation into this conspiracy to steal the twenty twenty election, and no, we shouldn't let it go. I don't wanna hear shit about, oh, it's time to move on.
It's not time to move on, or they'll do it again. It's terrifying. It's frightening. They stole the stamp thing. They hid that laptop information.
You know it. We know it. I want everyone as either they better give depositions, and if they commit criminal activity, I want them charged too. The deep state is real. It's members of the media.
It's intelligence community members. Here's the key. Active and retired. It's bureaucrats within the government.
Speaker 2: Mister Vindman, you testified in your deposition that you did not
Speaker 0: know the whistleblower. Ranking member, it's lieutenant colonel Vindman, please.
Speaker 2: You testified in the deposition that you did not know the who the whistleblower was.
Speaker 0: Per the advice of my counsel, I've I've been advised not to answer quite specific questions about members of the intelligence community. It is it is saboteurs inside the Trump administration last time. The deep state is real. The deep state is real. Tell me, are you worried about this retribution concept playing out?
@barbor92r - barbor92r
@iamyesyouareno that's why: https://t.co/7XfmjSrfgY
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asserts that Jews want to exterminate the European race. He names Richard Kudenhova Kalerghi as “the father of the European Union” and claims he was funded by Jewish bankers Rothschild and Warburg. He cites a book said to be written by Kalerghi, Prektisser I De alismus, in 1925, in which the Jews are described as a master race who can only assume world rule by weakening the European race. The means to weakening, according to the claim, would be to dissolve all European nations, destroy their cultural heritage and national traditions, and replace them with the European Union. The speaker alleges that Jews would invite Africans, Middle Easterners, and Asians to dilute the blood of Europeans through miscegenation to the point where they become a degenerate mixed race. He states that at that point these people would no longer have any sense of nationhood, and that the ancient Jewish messianic prophecies of world rule from Jerusalem would be fulfilled with Jews maintaining their nationhood and national status. He connects this to Nikolai’s writings from 1917 and claims it has manifested recently with the invasion of immigrants from Africa, the Middle East, and Asia into Europe, America, and Australia. The speaker concludes that they are deliberately setting about to genocide the white race and destroy all sense of nationhood, national heritage, and national culture in each of our nations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's very clear that the Jews want to exterminate the European race. Richard Kudenhova Kalerghi, who is the father of the European Union and who was funded by the Jewish bankers Rothschild and Warburg. Now, this man wrote a book called Prektisser I De alismus in 1925 in which he stated that the Jews are a master race and that the Jews can only assume the throne of rule over the world by weakening the European race and that the means to weakening the European race would be to dissolve all the European nations, destroy all their cultural heritage and their national traditions and replace that with the European Union and then to invite in Africans, Middle Easterners and Asians to dilute the blood of Europeans through miscegenation to the point where they became a degenerate mixed race. And then at that point, these people would no longer have any sense of nationhood and the ancient Jewish messianic prophecies of world rule out of Jerusalem with Jews maintaining their nationhood and their national status. It would fulfill the Jewish messianic prophecies that the Jews could then rule the world and this was completely in line with what Nikolai had written in 1917 and has manifest itself recently with the invasion of immigrants from Africa, from The Middle East and from Asia into Europe, America and Australia.
And they are deliberately setting about to genocide the white race and destroy all sense of nationhood and of national heritage and national culture in each of our nations.
@belleofva - 🇺🇸🍊🧡southerngalpal 🧡🍊🇺🇸
@EndWokeness Their silence is deafening ... https://t.co/uzKDjh8zOR
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: I am so angry. I am so angry. What are we doing? What are we doing? They killed another person. None of us was just safe. And anyone who is still telling us that we're being manic right now is not fucking paying attention. I am walking around with a gas mask in my fucking purse just in case I run into ice. I am walking around with goggles just be in case they gas us. I don't know what to do with any of this. I'm so angry.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I am so angry. I am so angry. What are we doing? What are we doing? They killed another person.
None of us was just safe. And anyone who is still telling us that we're being manic right now is not fucking paying attention. I am walking around with a gas mask in my fucking purse just in case I run into ice. I am walking around with goggles just be in case they gas us. I don't know what to do with any of this.
I'm so angry.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker conveys a sense of overwhelming stress and instability, insisting that despite life and the world appearing to unravel, there is a compulsory obligation to continue with work. The assertion “I have to go to work” repeats as a core refrain, underscoring a need to press forward even when circumstances are chaotic or threatening.
They emphasize their identity and vulnerability by stating, “I’m a black woman in America scared for my life,” highlighting a personal fear tied to their safety that coexists with the demand to function in daily life and employment. The tone oscillates between frustration and urgency as they repeatedly ask, “What the fuck? What the fuck? What?” before reaffirming the same imperative: “But I gotta go to work.”
The speaker acknowledges pervasive disruption—“The world is falling apart” and “Everything's falling apart”—yet insists on maintaining routine, insisting that they and others “have to go to work today and pretend like none of this shit is happening.” This dichotomy between external chaos and internal composure is a central tension in the message.
Toward the end, there is an exhortation to resilience and normalcy alongside a directive to adopt a positive outlook: “But hey, make the best of it. Right? We're gonna make it a good day.” The closing statement, “Have a good day,” reinforces the expectation to perform normal social and professional duties despite ongoing stress and danger.
Overall, the transcript portrays a stark conflict between personal fear and societal obligation, capturing a moment where the speaker acknowledges imminent threat and societal breakdown while still adhering to the routine of going to work and attempting to project steadiness and optimism for the day ahead.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I have to go to work. My life is falling apart, and I have to get up and fucking go to work. The world is falling apart, but I have to go to work. Right? I'm a black woman in America scared for my life, but I have to get up and go to work.
What the fuck? What the fuck? What? But I gotta go to work. Everything's falling apart.
But hey, guys. We have to go to work today and pretend like none of this shit is happening. But hey, make the best of it. Right? We're gonna make it a good day.
Right? Have a good day.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: What the do I have to do in this council in order to get respect as a black woman? I'm not afraid of anybody here. When I make a mistake, I will be clear. I don't hate you as a white woman. I don't hate you as a white man.
I am sick and tired of this body so stupidly racially divided, so afraid, so depraved. People with no faith because they are afraid of their losing their advancement. They're afraid of bargaining. They're afraid of leveraging. These people have, oh my god.
I can't even call you cowards because desperation deserves mercy. Cancer to redistricting. Fine. We give it to a white woman. Can we all get along?
Can we get together? Can we love each other now? Can we make sure that black and brown babies don't die? Can we make sure that cops don't kill before people are proven innocent? Can we do that?
No. No. No. No. Because this body crucifies you first because of allegations.
This is not a court. You don't get to crucify people before they're proven guilty. They're innocent until proven guilty. Amen. Now after this, I will look forward to working with you because I have stamina.
I believe, as Baldwin said, what you do not what you say. Your votes here sometimes are racist. You move sometimes in a way that hurts my people.
Speaker 1: Yes. Say that.
Speaker 0: And then when I get up to stand up and talk, oh, all she talks about is black stuff.
Speaker 1: Yes. You should. Good.
Speaker 0: I am here to represent every single black woman and man that suffers in the community. God has my back.
Speaker 1: You got your
Speaker 0: am not afraid to not have political asylum or any type of affiliations or connections. I came here, I fear none, no man, but my Lord. Amen. I came here to serve people. I came here to love.
I came here to grow. But people talk about this racial equity thing. It's all fake.
Speaker 1: Thank you. And
Speaker 0: you do politics and you hurt each other. And yet, here I am, five foot tall African woman from the projects. And I am here to tell you, if the voters don't vote me back
Speaker 1: We are get votes back.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What the do I have to do in this council in order to get respect as a black woman? I'm not afraid of anybody here. When I make a mistake, I will be clear. I don't hate you as a white woman. I don't hate you as a white man.
I am sick and tired of this body so stupidly racially divided, so afraid, so depraved. People with no faith because they are afraid of their losing their advancement. They're afraid of bargaining. They're afraid of leveraging. These people have, oh my god.
I can't even call you cowards because desperation deserves mercy. Cancer to redistricting. Fine. We give it to a white woman. Can we all get along?
Can we get together? Can we love each other now? Can we make sure that black and brown babies don't die? Can we make sure that cops don't kill before people are proven innocent? Can we do that?
No. No. No. No. Because this body crucifies you first because of allegations.
This is not a court. You don't get to crucify people before they're proven guilty. They're innocent until proven guilty. Amen. Now after this, I will look forward to working with you because I have stamina.
I believe, as Baldwin said, what you do not what you say. Your votes here sometimes are racist. You move sometimes in a way that hurts my people.
Speaker 1: Yes. Say that.
Speaker 0: And then when I get up to stand up and talk, oh, all she talks about is black stuff.
Speaker 1: Yes. You should. Good.
Speaker 0: I am here to represent every single black woman and man that suffers in the community. God has my back.
Speaker 1: You got your
Speaker 0: am not afraid to not have political asylum or any type of affiliations or connections. I came here, I fear none, no man, but my Lord. Amen. I came here to serve people. I came here to love.
I came here to grow. But people talk about this racial equity thing. It's all fake.
Speaker 1: Thank you. And
Speaker 0: you do politics and you hurt each other. And yet, here I am, five foot tall African woman from the projects. And I am here to tell you, if the voters don't vote me back
Speaker 1: We are get votes back.
@Flame_442 - Flame 🔥
WTF is wrong with these people. https://t.co/6KJ9YrDwsg
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1982, in Los Angeles, pathologist Melvin Weisberg, who ran several laboratories in Santa Monica, kept a large shipping container in his backyard. He was paying to ship it, but when he missed a payment, the container was repossessed and taken to a junkyard area with other crates. Upon opening the container, authorities found over 17,000 dead babies—the corpses of infants—in the crate.
The container’s repossession occurred after Weisberg’s check failed to clear; the truck was sent to reclaim the container. It was too heavy to unload from the trailer, so it remained on the trailer and was moved to another yard for unloading.
As the unloading began, workers reported severe reactions. Some workers were throwing up, and one man fell down near the container. They found it opened and discovered a mutilated human body. One worker recalled: “Close your eyes.” The experience was shocking and disturbing: “babies, you know, just all torn pieces. My hands chopped off, arms, legs, you know, just it just makes you sick to see something like that.” The account notes that some workers later reflected on what they had seen, describing it as something they would rather not witness again.
There was a legal dispute over what to do with the bodies. A court order allowed for burying the infants as a humane act, but the ACLU intervened, arguing that the remains were “just tissue” and suggesting incineration instead. The question of disposition prompted debate: “Problem for whom?” in response to the burial proposal, indicating a conflict between humanitarian burial and the ACLU’s position to treat the remains as tissue to be incinerated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is going to be graphic butterfly, so viewer discretion advised.
Speaker 1: In 1982 in Los Angeles, there was the craziest discovery and I never heard about this until a couple days ago, bro. There was this guy named Melvin Weisberg and he was a pathologist and that's basically like they do like all the lab tests on your body and like your skin. So he was one of those guys and he ran a bunch of laboratories throughout Santa Monica. Mhmm. So this dude was like a pretty important guy.
Right? Around that time, he was paying for the shipping container that he had in his backyard. It's like this huge ass shipping container. Right? Like he was paying money every month to keep it in his backyard and he ended up missing a payment.
They ended up confiscating confiscating the crate and they took it back. Right? And when they took it back, they took it to this like junkyard or this area where they had like a bunch of the other crates. They get it. They take it to this area, bro.
And dude, you're not gonna believe what they found inside of this crate. The crack opened the crate, they looked, and there was over 17,000 dead babies What? Inside of this container, and they found this inside of LA, in this 17,017 corpses of babies, bro.
Speaker 2: Malvin Weisberg, a pathologist, owned a large storage container which he kept in his backyard. When he failed to make the final two payments, it was repossessed.
Speaker 0: We made a decision to repossess it because his check did not clear the bank. So we sent the truck out to pick up the container.
Speaker 3: And we couldn't get it off the trailer, so we had to leave it on the trailer because it was too heavy. So I was asked by Nick to have a crew go down and unload the container at the other yard. I got a radio call that, from Ron Gillette, the foreman. And he said
Speaker 0: the men were throwing up and there was something really wrong. One of
Speaker 3: them fell down and hit me right in front of my feet. And it was opened up and there it was.
Speaker 4: Close your eyes.
Speaker 3: It was a mutilated body and the more closer I looked at it, it was a human body.
Speaker 4: And when I came to work the following day, I saw myself and I couldn't believe it. And just, you know, just look at me babies, you know, just all torn pieces. My hands chopped off, arms, legs, you know, just it just makes you sick to see something like that. Well, really, it just makes you want to cry when you see something like that.
Speaker 3: I really don't want to witness it again. Not what I saw.
Speaker 5: We had the court order that would allow us to bury these infants, being a humane act. And the ACLU comes in again saying that this is just tissue. We want to incinerate them and there's no need for a burial because if you had
Speaker 4: a
Speaker 5: burial somehow that's going to create a problem. Problem for whom?