reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@_johnnymaga - johnny maga
Your local grocery clerk has a higher IQ than the woman first in line to the Presidency Think about that https://t.co/u53Xrs0eDh
@hodgetwins - Hodgetwins
She ain’t wrong 💯 https://t.co/zGNmSy9tcM
Video Transcript AI Summary
We will have to explain to our kids what being a parent was like when they were kids. It's pretty crazy. The government was out of control, poisoning everything and sending our money to other countries. We couldn't pay our bills. We had to buy food from local farmers because the government poisoned everything. The medical industry was the number one killer, but we couldn't say anything because they were in control. We did things to preserve your fertility. That's why we're farmers. Any questions?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do y'all ever think about what we're gonna tell our kids about what being a parent was like when they were kids? Because if you say it out loud, it's like, wow. This shit's actually pretty crazy. Like, listen, kids. The government was out of control.
They had literally poisoned everything, and they were sending all of our money to other countries. So we were like, oh my god. We can't pay our bills. And they were like, oh my god. But these countries over here need your money.
So anyway, the food was poisoned, the water was poisoned, so we had to, like, start buying food from local farmers. And we didn't really eat a lot of fruits and vegetables just the quality was so bad because, you know, the government poisoned everything. And what was even crazier is the medical industry was basically the Thea. And they were, like, the number one killer of people in America, but you couldn't say anything about it because like I said, they were, like, literally the Yeah. So anyways, we did a lot of things to make sure you guys could keep your fertility as you got older.
So, yeah. That's why we're Farmers. Any questions?
@robertdunlap947 - Bobby D🎙
Oh my God😳! I spit my coffee out watching this😂. Yes mom, Jeomentia has dementia👊. 81 million votes is such a F ing LIE😡 https://t.co/PbR7pzaksG
Video Transcript AI Summary
Welcome to How to Speak Vitanese Volume 2. We'll start with "Precked," meaning to prioritize family over other plans. Joe uses it in a different context, expressing blessings and protection for troops. Next, we have "Dedosirashek," referring to uncertainty about the number of syllables. Joe relates it to a recession, simplifying the concept. "Fraggy feist" is a personal favorite, describing Disney's impact on a franchise. We then encounter the challenging phrase "Bipar Sinfonalakshana Gamwich," which Joe uses to emphasize a bipartisan agreement. "Azafutima footyfoot w" showcases a patriotic word ending with a unique consonant sound. Lastly, we learn about the traditional Bayanese pronunciation of "Zhong Shingeng Shu Shungen's were pasta Sheng akekawawa," highlighting the significance of pauses. Joe mentions groundbreaking Asian Americans and Cornpop.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Pracked. Fragiefice. Dego si reschek. Comenah. Bipar sinfunna lakshina gamwich.
Azafudima, footyfoot kowawa. Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to How to Speak Vitanese Volume 2. Let's jump in and start with something simple. One syllable, Precked, as in I would go to the Niners game, but we live in San Francisco, and I need to stay home to precked my family. Now let's see Joe use this in context.
Speaker 1: God bless you all, and may God protect our troops.
Speaker 0: Wow. I never thought to use it that way. Alright. For this next one, we're going to the other side of the spectrum.
Speaker 2: We started with 1 syllable. This one, I I don't even know
Speaker 0: how many there are. It's kind of fuzzy. Dedosirashek coming out. Dedosirashek coming out. You gotta see this in context to understand what Joe is talking about.
Speaker 2: A recession is coming. They even on Wall Street today said they don't see a recession coming now.
Speaker 0: You know, when he puts it in simple terms like that, it just makes me feel so good about the economy. I think that had to do with the economy. This next one is a personal favorite of mine. I use it all the time with the kids, fraggy feist. Fragggy feist.
As in Disney buying that franchise turned it into a real fraggy feist.
Speaker 1: The most diverse fighty feist.
Speaker 0: We haven't focused much on proper nouns, but I have a couple here I wanna share with you. 1st is a doozy. You may wanna practice said a few times before using it publicly in like say a toast or a eulogy. Bipar Sinfonalakshana Gamwich. Bipar Oh, pause.
Gamwich. Now let's see Joe Biden deliver this at full speed like a master.
Speaker 1: When I sign the bipartisan of Gamwich.
Speaker 0: This next one is great because it's just so patriotic, but also has a very unique ending. It ends with a syllable that is just simply 1 consonant, a w, and you have to pronounce it as w. So the word is Azafutima footyfoot w.
Speaker 1: America is a nation that can be defined in a single word. I was a foot
Speaker 0: I mean, that's just brilliant. Lastly, we arrive at a name and specifically a traditional Bayanese pronunciation. The name is Zhong Shingeng Shu Shungen's were pasta Sheng akekawawa. Again that pause is deliberate. It's a part of Badenese, something that you don't even realize, but long pauses make different meanings in these words.
So let me say it one more time. Now watch this. This is a master class.
Speaker 1: The group included groundbreaking Asian Americans like Vera Wang And Joan, Shungrang Shungrang's pronouncement, Shanga Koala. I think I pronounced it correctly. And Cornpop was a bad dude.
@Cancelcloco - Cancelthisclothingcompany
The math ain’t mathing… 🧐 #followthemoney https://t.co/fPpmsz27y2
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses allegations made by Steven Greer regarding secret alien craft recovery programs funded by military contractors like Lockheed Martin and Raytheon. They suggest that the missing money in the military budget could be attributed to funding for alien research and spacecraft development. The speaker analyzes the financial statements of military contractors and finds inconsistencies in the reported awards and revenues. They highlight discrepancies in the contracts awarded to Boeing, Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, and Raytheon. The speaker also mentions the special allegations against Lockheed Martin and Raytheon made by Greer, claiming their involvement in alien reproduction of technology. They question the unaccounted money and the connections between Lockheed Martin's board of directors and the military.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Know how the Pentagon has never passed an audit? And 1,000,000,000,000 of tax dollars are missing every year in the military budget, mysteriously just unaccounted for. You ever heard of Steven Greer, the director of c SETI and the Disclosure Project, who alleges that the military contractors like Lockheed Martin and Raytheon have secret alien craft recovery programs that they fund with secret black budget or not undisclosed to Congress or the president, secret programs that they run on their own where they do their own dark ass research into aliens? Well, I figured that if you put 2 and 2 together, you should be able to see evidence of money going missing because it would cost a lot of money to fund alien research and make alien spacecrafts and stuff like that. Right?
I did the deep dive into the finances and the reporting of government contracts awarded by the military and the financial statements of all the military contractors. There's only 5 of them. And maybe I'm stupid, or maybe Steven's onto something. Disclaimer. This one's gonna go kinda deep, but I'm gonna try my best to make it simple and understandable for because this is our tax dollars that we're talking about here.
So first things first, I went to usaspending.gov, where all the departments of government are required to submit information on all the contracts they're giving out where you can search by recipient. And you can already see it's a little confusing because there's, like, multiple well, Boeing's. 1 is the parent company, you know, with the big kahuna. But then there's all these child companies that are, like, subsidiaries of Boeing that are also getting awards. So the Boeing company apparently is totaled up to $17,700,000,000 in awards, which is kinda weird because when I go into the details to break it down by each contract, just these top 2 contracts here, we scroll over, there is worth $11,000,000.
Those total up to 22,000,000 right there. Sorry. I was saying 22,000,000. I meant 22,000,000,000 with a b. But that's just the start.
Northrop Grumman, great place to point out another weird inconsistency. They're apparently got 12,700,000,000 of total awards, But then you look up Northrop Grumman's annual revenues, and they got $36,000,000,000 of annual revenues. And it's not like they're selling this stuff to, like, mom and pop shops. Like, no one else is buying missiles and bombs and tanks except the US government. So clearly, there's some holes in this counting.
Oh, and when we look in the Northrop Grumman annual report that they put out to shareholder, in there, they pretty clearly tell us that they received a total of 31 $1,000,000,000 from the US government because notice up here, it's in 1,000,000. So their own annual report does not line up with what the US government's telling us they're giving out. General dynamics is cool and all, but this is where things get spicy. If we weren't already confused enough, when you search Lockheed Martin, you show up with not only 2 different parent corporations, but then also this child that has a shit like 30,000,000,000, 28,000,000,000, 28,000,000,000. Suddenly, this is totally not what the other ones looked like.
At least the other ones were, like, the parent had a shitload of revenue, and then all the other ones were, like, small. But this one's, like, 3 huge like, what's going on? I opened up the 2 different parent companies and looked at their children. 1 of them has 13 children. The other one has, like, a 130 children, and they don't come out the same even though, like so I'm like, okay.
What if I search for these different company IDs and see if these company IDs for this child companies are in this one that has 213 children here. They are. They're included. So, like, I searched this exact u UEI over here, and it's there. But it's awarded $0 in this one, and it's awarded $28,000,000,000 in that one.
I read that with a whole bunch of them, and it's the same. They're all totally different between the 2 different company. Even though in theory, it's the same child company that we're referring to in each case. I also did it searching by name, so Dodgerco Aerospace shows up on both of them. But here, they've got, what, $18,000,000 awarded, and here they've got $6,000,000 awarded.
Then we go to Lockheed Martin's annual report. They say in 3 different places throughout this annual report that I could find that their total net sales were $66,000,000,000. Once again, notice that this is in millions. They're always like that. $66,000,000,000, $66,000,000,000.
But, like, that doesn't equal that Lockheed Martin Global, and and it also doesn't equal that Lockheed Martin Corporation, but it also doesn't equal that plus that added up. Like, what the fuck, guys? But then on page 87 of Lockheed Martin's annual report, they actually break it down. Net sales by customer, they say the US government gave them 48 and a half $1,000,000,000 of contracts in 2022. But there's no world where you make these numbers turn into 48 $1,000,000,000.
So I wanna briefly remind us that Lockheed Martin has some special allegations against it made by Steven Greer that we're gonna talk about just a second here. But real quick, Raytheon, because he says a lot about Raytheon too. And Raytheon apparently has awarded been awarded only $6,400,000,000. But that's because there's also RTX Corporation, which is also Raytheon, which has $26,000,000,000. This guy apparently has over a 100 sworn statements under oath from, like, high ranking military officials and ex employees and things like that that specifically Lockheed Martin Skunk Works, one of their programs, their secret programs, and Raytheon, specifically.
Those 2 companies are some of the most involved according to Greer in alien reproduction of technology. So, like, there have been crashed spaceships is the allegation throughout history that the US government, mostly other governments too, have, like, confiscated and collected and put away in secret. And now these military contractors have acquired it and basically put the programs like, the super black secret top secret top top secret programs away into their secret bunkers. And it's basically now like a private military industrial complex working on alien technology. That's his allegation, which is so crazy.
Like, woah. That's crazy to think about. And if you think about it, if that were true, and I'm not claiming it necessarily is, I'm just looking at evidence and looking at the world and holding- holding ideas out. But if that were true, you would need a shitload of money that was unaccounted for that just like slipped through cracks into your budget to funnel away into secret programs. Like, there would have to be so many layers of don't ask questions about where 1,000,000,000 and 1,000,000,000 and 1,000,000,000 and 1,000,000,000 and 1,000,000,000 and 1,000,000,000 of dollars are going.
And it's worth noting that when I researched Lockheed Martin specifically, something stood out to me, And that was that their board of directors is particularly linked into military and to corporations directly in touch with the military. These dudes are super, super well connected to, like, deep state, like, CIA interests. And of all the military contractors, Lockheed Martin is the only one that has a special classified business and security committee, of which this guy is the chair. A lot of the other defense contractors, like Northrop Grumman, have people that, like, have worked at, like, Chipotle and, like, managed Target and UPS and Kraft and General Mills and stuff like that, but they are not that that's not business time. You guys are business time.
And, you know, it's just weird that the one company that he specifically talks the most about, the one that is most specifically specialized in high-tech stealth aircrafts, like the declassified programs that they have. And when I look at the government side of things, they also just happen to be one of the most convoluted black hole of a where the fuck is this money going companies on the list. I was even in the Excel spreadsheet adding up all of their different child companies, trying to figure out if that would make it work. Still didn't add up. But we're supposed to believe that we have the technology to build these kinds of things, but we don't have the technology to keep a basic budget of pluses and minuses.
Like, I know there's a lot of pluses and minuses, but, like, come on. We've got AI people. Are not failing their Pentagon audits because they can't keep a budget. They're failing their audits because they can't tell us where they're putting the money.
@JetBravado - JetBravado
@ScottAdamsSays Mathematics don’t lie. Late night statistic impossibly says it all. https://t.co/o0AMHMOOzd
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
Yes folks, she really is this stupid... https://t.co/lR5hXFeQyf
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the policy of zero tolerance, which includes family separation. Speaker 1 argues that zero tolerance is necessary and compares it to situations where parents are arrested with their children. Speaker 0 points out that legal asylum seekers are not charged with any crime. Speaker 1 argues that seeking asylum should be done through legal channels. The conversation ends with Speaker 0 acknowledging the statement.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the recommendation of the many that you recommended, you recommended family separation.
Speaker 1: I recommended zero tolerance.
Speaker 0: Which includes family separation.
Speaker 1: The same as this where every U. S. Citizen parent gets arrested when they're with a child.
Speaker 0: Zero tolerance was interpreted as the policy that separated children from their
Speaker 1: If I get arrested for DUI and I have a young child in a car, I will be separated. When a police officer in New York, and I arrested a father for domestic violence. I separated that
Speaker 0: father with all due respect, Legal asylees are not charged with any crime.
Speaker 1: When you're in the country, legally, it's violation 8 United States code 1325.
Speaker 0: King asylum is legal. If you
Speaker 1: wanna seek asylum, you go through the port of entry, do it the legal way. The attorney general of the United States has made that clear.
Speaker 0: Okay.
@MustangMan_TX - Texas 🇺🇸
Four college students and not one of them can answer the question “What is 15×4?” What a disgrace! https://t.co/KIXG45SSP3
Video Transcript AI Summary
+1 54 is stated to be 23. 20 3. 20 4. 40 8. 40 8. 40 8. 40 40 8. 40 8 before. 48. 40 8. By Wednesday, forty eight.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What is +1 54? 15 4. Gosh. It's 23. 20 3.
20 4. 40 8. 40 8. 40 8. 40 40 8.
40 8 before. 48. 40 8. By Wednesday, forty eight.
@deadlinedom - Dom B
@Likeshesays Wow. Where in hell do you get these ficticious numbers? Jesus you MAGA cultists are hilarious.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
Where did these people go to school? 🤔 https://t.co/vTKWE78tPU
Video Transcript AI Summary
Biden will win in a landslide, with low unemployment and decreasing inflation. Gas prices are down. The Fed raising rates, illegal immigrants coming in daily, likely to vote Democrat. Border issue seen as a political tactic by Democrats. Biden accused of opening borders for political gain. Advocates for no borders, one world government. Final pitch for Biden includes no borders, more war, spying, and bankrupting the country. Concerns raised about the potential downfall of America if Biden wins.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I believe Biden's gonna win in a landslide. Lowest unemployment in 60 years, baby. What about inflation? You you have any questions about inflation? Inflation's going down.
Actually, it's going up. It's going down. It's gas prices are down. What? Gas prices are down.
Inflation is down. What? What? What? See.
What? Why why is the Fed then raising rates? How many illegals are coming across the border every day? A lot. So about 10 to 15000 a day.
Do you think Joe Biden They're all gonna vote, Den. You're okay. Can you say that again? The illegals? Woah.
Illegals. Yeah. They're coming here. They're gonna vote Democrat, and we're gonna win. We can vote.
So so you are you are admitting that the so you're admitting the border is a political tactic by the Democrat party. Joe Biden is opening the flood gates of this country because he wants to hold on to political power. We've been saying this for a long time. Proof. Proof you just admitted it.
What is he doing to secure the border? When you have 15,000 people a day coming across your southern border Who cares? That is not a mistake. Who cares? But but who cares?
Do you believe in borders? I was like a I believe that no, no, no borders. No. One world world government. And and and final pitch for Joe Biden?
No no borders, lots of war, war, more spying, and bankrupt the country. He's still gonna win. You guys might win an election, but that will be the death of America if that is the case.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Replacement theory is a conspiracy theory they said. https://t.co/Muu5aUbJqo
Video Transcript AI Summary
Amsterdam, The Hague, and Rotterdam have high migrant populations from non-Christian, non-Western countries. London and Brussels also have a majority of migrants. The speaker believes the great replacement theory is now reality, with native populations being outnumbered. They criticize leaders for celebrating this shift as "diversity" meaning fewer white people. They question why leaders would be happy about their people no longer being the majority in their own country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The capital. Amsterdam currently consists of 56% migrants. The Hague, 58% migrants. Rotterdam, almost 60% migrants. And, of course, most of these immigrants come from non Christian, non Western, African, and Middle Eastern countries.
Conclusion, the Dutch population is already outnumbered in the majority of our cities. But that looks let's look onwards. London, 54% migrants. Again, conclusion, native population outnumbered. Brussels, color me shocked, 70% migrants.
Conclusion, native population majorly outnumbered. And other Europeans will, of course, follow suit soon if they haven't already. So I'm going to draw the forbidden conclusion here. The great replacement theory is no longer a theory. It's reality.
And what's interesting about replacement is that the establishment will either deny its existence or when they admit to it, they say that it's a good thing that the native European population is soon no longer a majority on its own continent. Dutch national disgrace and dubbed climate pope, Van Stimmermans, already stated in 2015 that diversity is humanity's destiny and that Europe will be diverse. And of course, by now, I think we all know what they mean with the words diversity. It means less white people, less of you. Imagine this in an Asian or an African country.
Imagine their leaders rejoicing in the fact that their people will soon no longer be a majority in their own country. Absolutely unthinkable. Unimaginable. So what in the world is wrong with our leaders?
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The stats she rattles off are insane.
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
“Republicans are creepy and weird” https://t.co/3HCoSvbFjZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
I want to talk to kids. Sometimes people are more than just boys or girls, they can be both or something in between. If you see someone like me, please be extra nice, because we can feel lonely. Being kind is really important.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanna talk to the kids. Parents watch the video and then hand the phone over to the young kids. Hi there. I get asked a lot, are you a boy or a girl? And I love that question.
And so I wanted to just tell you sometimes human beings are more than boy or girl. Sometimes we're something else. Sometimes we're both. Sometimes, we kinda float in between, and sometimes we're a boy, sometimes we're a girl, because human beings are creatures, and we're wild and exciting. But I wanna ask you, a favor.
If you see a kid like me or an adult like me, would you be extra nice to them? Would you do me a favor and be very, very kind? Yeah. Like anybody, we can feel lonely. And so if you're kind to us, it would be really, really important.
@NoContextHumans - Out of Context Human Race
She gotta be the stupidest person on the planet🤣 https://t.co/agoqmJ40VM
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 is interviewing Speaker 1, who denies being a musician but admits to making music and acting. Speaker 0 clarifies that they meant musician, not magician. Speaker 1 insists they are not a musician, but then admits to making music. Speaker 0 tries to confirm if Speaker 1 is a musician, but Speaker 1 continues to deny it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That's amazing. I don't I didn't know that about you.
Speaker 1: What what do you know?
Speaker 0: That you're a musician. That's why I'm interviewing you today so I can get to know you.
Speaker 1: So I'm a musician. Mhmm. What the fuck that mean? Make magic or something? What is musician?
Speaker 0: I think that's I think you're confusing that.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I'm not no musician. I make music. I make music. And that's not all I do.
I make music. I act. I'm a TV star too. A young woman.
Speaker 0: Uh-huh. I'm just really quick. I think you're confusing.
Speaker 1: I'm not confusing nothing because you you don't know. You thought that all I was was a magician or whatever the fuck you said.
Speaker 0: See, that's what I think you think I said. I said musician, not magician. I don't
Speaker 1: think, baby. I don't think. What is that? That's ghetto. I don't think.
I know. So you too Think.
Speaker 0: I didn't say magician, Suki. I said musician. And I think you are a musician.
Speaker 1: No, baby. I do music.
Speaker 0: So you just really just really quick for the record, could you say you don't think you're a musician?
Speaker 1: Not none of that.
Speaker 0: But then after that you just said I do music. Yeah. I do music. So in other words, you're a musician.
Speaker 1: No. I'm not. Okay.
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Just look at the numbers!!! https://t.co/FkKid63Br4
Video Transcript AI Summary
Here is a summary of the provided transcript:
The speaker presents economic data from the Federal Reserve, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Energy Information Agency, and Nasdaq to compare economic performance under the Trump and Biden-Harris administrations.
Key metrics include: Inflation rate year over year (1.89% under Trump, 5.28% under Biden-Harris), cumulative inflation (7.8% higher under Trump, 19.2% higher under Biden-Harris), average gas price (down 5.4% under Trump, up 46.6% under Biden-Harris), 30-year mortgage rates (down 34.8% under Trump, up 132% under Biden-Harris), average rent costs (up 11.8% under Trump, up 21.6% under Biden-Harris), NASDAQ Composite (up 138.2% under Trump, up 39.4% under Biden-Harris), grocery prices (up 6.5% under Trump, up 20.9% under Biden-Harris), electricity prices (up 4.2% under Trump, up 29.6% under Biden-Harris), and real hourly wages (up 6.8% under Trump, down 2.2% under Biden-Harris).
The speaker suggests these numbers, based on data as of July 12, 2024, can help viewers decide who was the "better CEO" without relying on emotion. The speaker claims Harris would be more liberal and cost everyone more money.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why didn't they talk about what's really important to all of us? Do me a favor and take a breath. Don't scroll. Watch the numbers I'm gonna give you. A lot of you on the left are arguing about emotion.
A lot of you on the right are arguing that it's about, hey, 4 years ago, this, that, and the other. Let's get real numbers that you you can now sink your teeth into. If you're on the left, you're gonna find out exactly what Harris Biden have done. If you're on the right, you're gonna find out exactly what Trump did. This is not a chart I made up.
This is an actual chart put together based on the Federal Reserve, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Energy Information Agency, and the Nasdaq. These are real numbers that you can sink your teeth into, that you could take to work and show them at the water cooler, that you can have after dinner if there's an argument about politics. Let's just take the emotion out and talk about numbers. The inflation rate year over year under Trump, 1.89 percent. Under Biden Harris, 5.28%.
Inflation cumulative, 7.8% higher under Trump, 19.2% higher under Biden Harris. Average gas price under Trump down 5.4% to $2.49 average, up 46.6% under Biden Harris, $3.50 average. 30 year mortgage rates down 34.8% under Trump, 3.86% average, up a 132% under Biden Harris, 5.45% average if you can get a mortgage. Average rent costs up 11.8% under Trump, up 21.6% under Biden Harris. NASDAQ Composite was up a 138.2% under Trump, up 39.4% under Biden Harris.
Grocery prices up 6.5% under Trump, up 20.9% under Biden Harris. Electricity prices were up 4.2% under Trump, up almost 30% at 29.6 under Biden Harris. And real hourly wages, a big indicator, up almost 7% under Trump, 6.8%, down 2.2% under Biden Harris. These are real numbers that I didn't make up. These are numbers you can go and research and verify.
These are numbers that are based on July 12, 2024. The jobs numbers, of course, got worse since then with a readjustment down by about a 1000000 jobs. Now get emotional if you want and complain about somebody's hair, how they tweet, or whatever, or their age, or you can actually look at numbers and decide who was the better CEO. Who was the better person in charge? Because Harris is no different than Biden except she's a little more progressive, more liberal on policies which will cost everybody even more money should she win.
Any questions on this, make sure that you post them right here. Make Make sure you share this and I appreciate you staying till the end of the video. It's important that we have real knowledge and that's what I just gave you. Come on.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
And to think they didn't even fact-checked her once... They think people are stupid. https://t.co/O89F2x3rME
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
This is a member of Congress. What a clown show https://t.co/4oFU82ddsN
Video Transcript AI Summary
Appropriations is where the money moves in Congress. Democrats are making lives smoother through government funding.
Republicans' Project 2025 is suspect, aiming to eliminate the Department of Education. This would negatively impact the environment, education, and rights.
Democrats are keeping people informed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yo. This is the ranking Rizzler on appropriations, serving Connecticut's 3rd district. It's time to enter your dark academia congress era. Alright, besties. House appropriation is the money moves in congress.
We are not chasing the bag. We are the bag. Democrats are making lives smoother through government funding. It's giving. It's giving it.
So Sigma main character energy. But Republicans project 2025 is mad sus. Eliminating the Department of Education, negative aura points. Basically, the biggest fandom tax on the environment, on your education, and your rights. Big l posting it online, buddy.
Democrats understood the assignment, but the law see how I keep you informed? Very cute, very demure.
@MikeASperrazza - Mike Sperrazza
This human should not educate our children. https://t.co/MlCrG6Pqgv
@MYLUNCHBREAK_ - MY LUNCH BREAK
Someone's lying. https://t.co/EdOqQBgcTh
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that mainstream history is a lie, particularly regarding the "Great Fires" of the 1800s. They argue that the reported death tolls are impossibly low considering the number of buildings destroyed.
Specifically, the speaker cites the Great Chicago Fire of 1871, where 17,500 buildings burned but only a tiny percentage of the population supposedly died. They suggest the city was either empty or the death toll was suppressed, and that the fires were actually planned demolitions of old-world buildings using bombs and explosives.
The speaker highlights other fires, including the Iroquois Theater fire (600 deaths), the Great Fire of London (6 deaths, 13,200 houses destroyed), the Great Fire of New York (2 deaths, 700 buildings), and fires in Paris, Texas; Toronto, Canada; and Montreal, Canada, all with suspiciously low death counts despite widespread destruction. They suggest the population worldwide was near zero in the early 1800s and that a previous advanced civilization existed before 1776. The speaker believes these fires were deliberate attacks to hide our true history. They cite the Great Fire of Detroit, Phoenix, Miami, and Houston as further examples of this pattern.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of two things is more likely than what they're telling us and more probable mathematically, where all of the buildings are destroyed, yet nobody had an issue getting away. So either there were more people that died than just zero point zero zero eight percent of the population when all of the 17,500 buildings were in flames than we're actually being told about, which would make a lot more sense. But this is not the narrative that we're told. And to clear this up and to give this a much clearer perspective, 1871, where people didn't even have cars yet. They had to ride their horses or run around in order to escape this fire.
The population simply wasn't 300,000 people like we're being told. And these cities were actually empty, and the previous civilization was erased. And it was time, more specifically, a planned time to demolish most of their work. And they just absolutely shredded these 17,500 buildings with massive bombs and explosives to destroy the old world civilization's construction. Buildings that would have given this entire narrative away decades ago, destroying 17,500 buildings before anyone really even started living in Chelaga again.
And this option, in my opinion, seems like the most logical answer. Because why would only 300,000 people already have 17,500 buildings in the place? I think this point alone proves that we are being lied to, that the main stream history is not truthful. Right after this eighteen seventy one fire, they tell us that they just cleaned the whole thing up, and all these other brand new buildings are magically here again. For example, like we discussed in episode 58, the Palmer House was completed just four years after the eighteen seventy one Great Fire.
So we can see that the narrative has a ton of issues and flaws. It is becoming story hour. It's not factual information like we deserve at this point, and these questions that we're asking are just opening the floodgates for the truth to come through. We also have the Temple Building to compare the great fire information to. The Temple Building was the tallest building in Chicago, you know, the building that was owned by the which still meets today.
And it also holds the narrative where the primary designer of the building and the primary representative, both of them, not one, both died during the construction, which we have seen so many times. Where we also know from episode 58 that they moved to the new in 1926 where it's time to take this up a notch and really start to put this whole thing into perspective and also go even deeper than we did in our last episode because there is so much more to this story that we didn't cover yet. When the new building supposedly replaced an even earlier venue on the exact same site. So what happened to the one? It opened in November of nineteen o three when the fire broke out one month later in December of nineteen o three.
One month later? During a performance and caused six hundred and two deaths and ranks as the number one worst theater fire in The United States even to this day. For nearly one hundred years, this fire was the deadliest fire in one building in US history, now being number one. And get this. This theater was supposedly fireproof.
One month after being opened, it burns down. This is incredible. And we have seen this exact story before from our Saint Louis episodes when they say that the fire started due to lighting the curtain on fire. So this curtain starts on fire, and the fire exits were locked or hidden, which sounds like a plan opinion. Even if this wasn't a event.
Let's think logically here. In 1871, during the Chicago fire, when 17,500 stone and brick buildings were magically burned to the ground, even though we know that stone and brick does burn to the ground from house fires, which is why you have stone and brick fireplaces inside your living room. And everyone all over the world remains extremely calm, and your neighbors don't seem to mind either. It doesn't and never will spread to their house or to the basement. It won't make your house look like a bomb went off.
And I guess I should say don't try this at home, but come on. You get the point. Do you think that it's possible that they possibly by chance might not have been able to escape their homes or they were maybe up too high in one of the buildings to escape? Do you think that a group of people may have had some trouble escaping their building? Do you think that possible that more than one of the 17,500 buildings somewhere in Chicago that looked like they were exploded might have crumbled on top of someone?
Or is it even possible that maybe a single issue might have came up anywhere like this theater did where the door was jammed? They say that the Chicago fire started at 08:30PM. Do you think that maybe some people were sleeping and didn't realize there was a fire until it was too late. Were there possibly some individuals that had a broken leg or were disabled? Was there not a hospital with people in it that possibly couldn't escape the smoke?
And if they did, where did everybody go? The fire was supposedly engulfing the roads and spreading to the next building. All 300,000 people would have been burnt to a crisp if the mainstream history tale was true. It would have been one massive bonfire, yet basically everybody survived. My point is how is it mathematically possible that one building kills 600 people, yet 17,500 buildings killed 300 people?
At which point does everyone understand that we are being lied to, and the mainstream history from only a hundred and fifty years ago is a lie. So how can you believe something that the same people are telling us about from over 1,000 ago? And how can we believe anything that we're being told by this group of people that lie constantly? Nearly every single one of these great fires happened in the eighteen hundreds right after the 1776 date, which was when The USA began. The main great fire that predates the 1776 date falls on 01/06 which is the London great fire, which is where The USA originally came from.
And I'm guessing based on all of my research that this date of one is a code and not a real event. Because I'm about to take this thing to a whole another level from this point until the end of the episode, and we are going to destroy their narrative. So I hope you all have your popcorn ready. It's time to make our own history. Here we go.
The great fire of London in one six destroyed 13,200 houses, 87 parish churches, the royal exchange, Guildhall, and Saint Paul's Cathedral, 13,200 houses. So there must have been thousands of casualties. Right? Six people died in the great fire of London, and this is when we know we have found something huge. When we go to New York, where they had the great fire of New York destroying 700 buildings.
And which year was that in again? I forget. Can somebody clear this up for me? Am I right, or am I definitely right that this operation worldwide began in 1776. The great fire of New York happened in 1776, holding only two deaths, covering 700 buildings.
Two people died in the entire great fire of New York. Two, seven hundred buildings, and only two people in 1776. So what's the total at? We have one building in Chicago holding 600 deaths. I have shown three great fires so far, Chicago, New York, and London, with a total of three hundred and eight deaths that have a total of 31,490 buildings destroyed.
This is impossible for 31,490 buildings to be engulfed in flames with basically nobody dying. Three hundred and eight deaths to be exact. If you trusted the narrative before today, this day will be the final day that it is trusted ever again. Because in 1916, Paris, Texas also had a great fire where it destroyed everything in its path besides people because it destroyed 1,440 old world buildings where only three people died, moving the total old world buildings that were destroyed up to 32,930. 32,930 buildings gone.
And could you imagine what these buildings, what these cities looked like with the mainstream narrative admitting that these buildings were all here, and now they're gone. So, again, 32,930 buildings are gone with a total of now only 311 Making this extremely clear that we are being lied to about something. Either the death totals were actually way higher than what we're being told or these cities were basically empty. I've had a lot of people comment that they want me to include Canada and incorporate it into my research, and I can't wait to do that right now. Toronto, Canada, you're up.
You had a great fire in nineteen o four, destroying over 100 old world buildings. We know these were built by a much more advanced previous civilization, buildings that would make zero sense in our fabricated main historical timeline where we are given a massive fire, destroying everything in its path with a total of zero deaths. Nobody, not a single person, not one person inhaled too much smoke for two to ten minutes. In a great fire that took down over 100 buildings in 1852, we are given the great fire of Montreal, Canada, where it left 10,000 people homeless when 57,000 people in 1852 had hundreds of buildings, which isn't logical at all or isn't mathematically probable in itself. If you think that Donkeys Incorporated saddled up in the early half of the eighteen hundreds and knocked out massive cities for only 57,000 people, I think it's time to reconsider what you've been told.
When within a few hours, one quarter of Montreal was destroyed, and yet again, nobody died. Nobody. Destroying almost half of the city's houses. In 1852, they all evacuated perfectly and ran to safety. Everybody, not a single person had an issue?
Do you understand what it would take for a fire to spread from house to house rapidly? We all understand that this fire would be massive. I know I'm being brutally honest, but a lot of people would have died. This would have been extremely catastrophic. This would not be a case of zero death.
In fact, it would have been nowhere near zero deaths, and we all know this. This narrative of zero casualties is simply not the true history of our past, where we are also told that 1,100 houses burned down. Nobody had an issue getting away from these fires, not a single person. Fires that supposedly swept the streets to spread to the next house over and over in 1852. How were they just escaping this situation?
You would think that somebody would have died from inhaling too much smoke. Now this tells us 1,100 houses burned down, but leaves out the buildings. So let's just estimate that it was around the same as Toronto, adding another 100 buildings to that 1,100, moving the total buildings destroyed from these great fires to 34,230 buildings destroyed and only 311 And remember, there are hundreds of great fire narratives that happened in the city near you. The mainstream history is suggesting that we are supposed to believe at this point that 110 buildings have to go down in flames for us to record one death. If this was one death per 22 buildings destroyed in these great fires, we would be at a much more realistic death total of one thousand five hundred and fifty five deaths, which is 1 the amount that we're being told.
When realistically, it should be flipped, we should realistically have less death today per building than they would in the eighteen hundreds since we have cars, phones, proper firefighters, and the rest. To say that zero people in the eighteen hundreds from a great fire that swept through the entire city, leaving the end result looking like massive bombs went off multiple times is mathematically impossible. This is not a realistic narrative at all. And now that we have looked into this, compared it to other situations, shown factual evidence that they are lying in all of this. I wanna give my opinion on what happened.
I think that the population worldwide was basically zero in the early eighteen hundreds, and I'm gonna go into great detail on this in an upcoming episode. The previous civilization's population around the world before 1776, I would say 100 prior to 1776 based on the condition that these buildings were in. It would put it at around a hundred years, realistically. It couldn't have been thousands of years. These buildings would have just been a mess, just from the nature growing all over it and inside.
But I believe the worldwide population in what we call the '15 or 16 hundreds was massive. I believe that the technology was much more advanced than what we have today, And we are giving back a very small percentage of this technology and told that it's brand new. And we all get excited and believe it. We are told that we are advancing when really we're just going around and around, getting the same exact technology as last time or less than the previous civilization. And this is all based on control.
The fact that they wrote these fake stories and made it so blatantly obvious that they are fake, saying that zero peep in massive fires, destroying all of their homes, all of their buildings over and over and over. It really makes me think that they were just waiting for somebody to find this information, like it's some sort of test or some strange game because it really is just so obvious once you see the lie. Now knowing what we know about the great fires, I'm going to cover a few more things. Here we have the great fire of Detroit in eighteen o five, which was twenty nine years after The USA came around, and also twenty nine years after the New York great fire in 1776. Notice, nearly all of these great fires are happening after that date, and they tell us that nearly everything was destroyed.
But yet again, nobody died. Where it starts in the stable again, and yet again, not a single Everything is destroyed. Nobody And this reminds me of the repeating narrative where they tell us that everything was built in a year perfectly over and over and over all over the world by a guy and his donkey riding team with no power tools, no machines, no training. The stone shipping company coordinate the delivery right on time. The mud trails and the rain were never an issue.
The freezing winters, they just told them to get over it and toughen up. And they get the whole building or cathedral done with no issues done in seven months. This kind of stuff is so repetitive in just a different way. These narratives hold patterns, and this is one of them. These fire narratives are all connected, and I don't personally think that they were fires.
I think they were bomb explosives. They were deliberate attacks on the old world buildings to hide our true past, our true history, which is exactly why we are all so confused as to where we are and what we're doing here. I really hope you all enjoyed learning about these great oh, oh, wait. What is this? Detroit only had 600 people during this massive great fire?
What did 600 people need hundreds of buildings for in eighteen o five? Well, the math doesn't lie, and it never will. These 600 people did not build these buildings. And I was gonna end this episode right there, but I just wanna make sure this is not a debate at all and an episode that everyone can remember. 1916 Phoenix, great fire.
80 buildings destroyed, one death. Miami, Florida, nineteen o one, 2300 and 68 buildings gone to the fire. Only seven deaths from thousands of buildings. Only seven deaths. Houston, great fire of nineteen twelve.
The fire claimed zero lives but caused an estimated $7,000,000 in damage to property, equating to $237,000,000 today, and nobody died. I hope you all have a great rest of your day. I'll be back very soon with much more. See you.
@its_The_Dr - Johnny Midnight ⚡️
That Poll for Democrats seems Fishy, more than 100 percent Tallied! 😂 https://t.co/25ET5x38Aj
Video Transcript AI Summary
A speaker points out that poll data adds up to 110%. They ask if this is intentional or an error and yield for clarification.
Another speaker responds that the data is from a Quinnipiac poll held two weeks prior, noting it contains information about Donald Trump's falling poll numbers.
The first speaker reiterates that the data adds up to 110% and calls the poll "fake."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Behind you, behind our ranking member, it adds up to a 110%. Just wanted to clarify. Is it meant to add up to a 110%, or is that an error? Can you yield? Yeah.
I do. This is from a Quinnipiac poll that was, held two weeks ago, and this is the data that was provided. There's a wealth of information, including information about Donald Trump's falling poll numbers, so you should take a look. Thanks. How you doing, Beth?
The gentleman yields, and it still adds up to 110 percent. That's a fake poll right there.
@kurtcaz1 - Kurt Caz
They’re lying about the numbers https://t.co/t1yoxWQAXs
Video Transcript AI Summary
Guys, this is Paris in 2025. They're lying about the numbers. This is the new France. Coming soon. Coming soon to you, to a neighborhood near you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Guys, this is Paris in 2025. They're lying about the numbers. This is the new France. Coming soon. Coming soon to you, to a neighborhood near you.
