TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

Saved - May 24, 2023 at 5:03 AM

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

ANOTHER ONE: Special Assistant to @JohnFetterman says his boss is “okay with overturning the Second Amendment” and handpicked journalists like @karaswisher “will say exactly what you f***ing want them to. #RealJohnFetterman https://t.co/vVhlPaZ4EA

Video Transcript AI Summary
John Fetterman's special assistant, Luke Borwegan, reveals that they selectively choose journalists who will tell the story they want. They mention specific journalists like Kara Swisher and the group Pod Save America. Borwegan also admits that Fetterman would be open to overturning the Second Amendment and supports red flag laws. The video encourages viewers to support the O'Keefe Media Group in their mission to uncover unfiltered and unbiased information.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He'd probably he'd Speaker 1: be okay with, like, overturning the 2nd Amendment problem. Like, I think he much generally prefer, like, nobody has done you know? Speaker 0: It's so interesting, but I wanna know who they are because I'll I'll listen to those people. Speaker 1: There there's, like, puppets, though. I think reporters who will, like, paint aren't like, we know we'll Yeah. Yeah. Pretty much. Like, Speaker 2: Well, we'd like to introduce you to special assistant, Luke Borwegan, who told us quote, everyone wants a story on Federman. Speaker 1: It's like everybody wants a story about John Federman, and we only give it to certain people. Speaker 2: Well, leave it to the O'Keefe Media Group to bring you that story. Speaker 0: That's like if you have I mean, like, and they also realize is that that that Speaker 2: James O'Keefe with OMG here in our nation's capital to report on a Story involving US senator John Fetterman. Associates, colleagues, constituents have long been fascinated with Fetterman's mental and cognitive Issues. Everyone wants a story on John Fetterman. Well, we'd like to introduce you to special assistant Luke Borwagan who told us, quote, everyone Wants a story on Federman. Well, leave it to the O'Keefe Media Group to bring you that story. Speaker 1: Like, my job is, like, to be, like, the in between between him and the rest of the staff. I have, like, an iPad, a Speaker 0: carry around, which, like, live transcribes everything everyone's saying. But sometimes it misses stuff or, like, it'll just cut out, based on, like, you know, self-service and a job with the hoodie out there. So, like, he Speaker 1: can pick up on everything they're saying. So my I have to Speaker 0: strong-arm these journalists. I'm like, Speaker 1: that's not my job, but, like, you know, there's so many reporters and, like, the reporters, like, they don't want we don't we shouldn't just be telling them to off. Like, if they're in orders we like, like, it's good to have a good relationship with them. Yeah. We have our press operation is like a fucking work of art, like, the way that, like, like, reporters. And you can tell when story about John Cutter, and we only give it to certain people, my big reporters who were like, paint on, like, we know we'll paint the narrative the way we want. So it's like when John tries himself up for depression, you tell 1 reporter, in in particular because, like, they will hit the facts that we've talked to. I mean, it's like we picked reporters who, like, we know will give us, like, a good treatment, they're desperate for an interview Speaker 0: with John. Speaker 1: I mean, like, it doesn't mean they're back reporters, but, like, do you want access journalismists? No. It's like report it's Speaker 0: it's like in order to Speaker 1: well, basically tell whatever story, like, their subject wants as long as they get the interview. Like, there's like, jump journalists who are accused of that because, like, everybody wants an interview with the guy. Yeah. But, like, that's Speaker 0: the thing. Speaker 1: When you're so exclusive with give interviews to, it's like the ones you say, like, we'll just say it's not a Speaker 0: You know? Like So that's why you pick the journalist that Pics. We'll say whatever you want this to. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Pretty much. Like, they wouldn't be in a in a bad light. You know? Speaker 2: Borwagan's special assistant to John Fetterman Says that they pick journalists that will, quote, say exactly what the you want them to. He also says that the journalists are Puppets. He actually names the journalists, including Kara Swisher and the group Pod Save America behaving like puppets For the John Fetterman campaign. Who? Speaker 0: Joe Scarborough. Joe Marlboro? Yeah. Speaker 1: Scarborough. Like, you ever heard of, like, Morning Joe? Speaker 0: Morning about a guy that you guys didn't interview with? Speaker 1: Yeah. And he actually socks. Pod Save America is like these former, a lot of, Pod Save America, like podcasts. Speaker 0: Oh, Pod Save America? Speaker 1: Yeah. Like, they have these former alarm staffers Okay. Who, like they were, like, one of the first big political podcasts. I think they're, like, the number one political podcast in the country. Just because, like, they've had it for, like, 10 years and, like, built up brand behind it before anybody else had podcasts. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: We didn't interview with them post stroke. Like, I hung out from the election. Okay. And they did really well. Speaker 0: Because you knew they would go along with what you wanted? Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Speaker 0: So who are those journalists that you guys like? Speaker 1: We have an interview with Time Speaker 0: in a blitz. Time? Speaker 1: Time Magazine? Yeah. There's this, like, tech reporter Speaker 0: who I mean, not really. Nothing is also Nothing to say. I just asked has, like, Speaker 1: It's also it's, like, geared into political stuff. Her name is Tara Swisher, and she, like, has multiple podcasts that I listen to, like, every single day. Speaker 0: Is she one of the ones that has interviewed Letterman, though? It was so interesting, but I wanna know who they are because I'll I'll listen to those people. Oh, god. Speaker 1: There there's like puppets, though. Speaker 2: Politicians in Washington are often Loathed to reveal their actual positions on matters of public policy. John Fetterman and his campaign staff are no exception. Luke Borwagan sheds light on the matter discussing the views on firearms that his boss has and his boss owns, While also revealing John Fetterman's true intention to ban the second amendment. This raises concerns about the future of the United States of America, Including what other constitutional amendments that the congress critters want banned. Luke Borwegan, special assistant to John Fetterman, Says that they would be okay with, quote, like probably overturning the second amendment. Speaker 1: It's a 100% preventable. Speaker 0: Like, red flag laws? Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Speaker 0: Hell yeah. I love that. He he owns a lot of bands. Does he own the guns that he's trying to ban? No. All I got is, like, shot them. Like, I'm sure Yeah. So what exactly will he try to ban? So so he would be for, like, he would be for, like, completely just removing the second ring thing? Oh, god. No. Speaker 1: Very specific question. Speaker 2: Honesty is so important in the United States of America. If we do not have informed consent, if we do not have actual information that's unfiltered, unprejudiced, Unbiased and uncensored, we simply don't have the information required for us to elect our representatives, And therefore, we cannot actually have freedom. Freedom itself becomes an illusion without access to unfeathered, no pun intended, Information. We want you to wear a camera and follow the footsteps of this brave journalist who recorded this aid, who got him to be honest, Who got him to say what he really thinks and what he actually believes, and nothing could be more important to that. So if you wanna do this, Go to the O'Keefe Media Group website. Fill out our Jot form. We'll ship you a camera. We'll send you in the field, and we'll give you $1,000 To unearth this sort of information, stay tuned for the next drop tomorrow when I personally show up Stay tuned and subscribe to O'KeefeMediaGroup.com to support this work, to support the First Amendment, And our right tell these stories. See
Saved - October 21, 2023 at 7:22 PM

@Sassafrass_84 - Sassafrass84

Ahhaaaa nutsack Joe. He grew testicals on his chin. Will the real Joe Biden please stand up? It's not such a far-fetched theory that this isn't Joe. Our government is a complete joke. We see several versions of biden, not to mention fetterman as well. Screaming JUMANJII... https://t.co/2ALbzmM3SA

Video Transcript AI Summary
Joe Biden's chin has been a topic of discussion lately, with people questioning its unusual appearance. It seems to indent strangely as he speaks, which is not typical. Comparing pictures, it's clear that something is off. Some speculate that he may have missed a Botox shot, but that wouldn't explain the chin's behavior. Regardless, it's evident that Biden's overall appearance is not healthy. His chin seems to be melting, and there are concerns about his well-being. People are urging him to seek medical attention, as his chin has taken on a peculiar shape.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: After this video came out of Joe Biden, people had some questions about what's going on with his chin. As he was talking, it was also, like, indenting really weird as he's talking. It's not what a normal chin would due. Look at this. How many shows do we have? Look at the chin on Joe Biden in all 3 of these pictures, and then what the hell is going on, how can your chin do that? You may have missed a Botox shot, Sarah. Botox doesn't do that. At the minimum, I'd say this. The man does not look No. He's he's Whether that is the real Joe Biden is falling off. Of course, he doesn't look healthy. His chin is melting. Ting. Yeah. We need to get this guy to a doctor. He grew testicles on his chin. Help him. Somebody help
Saved - October 25, 2023 at 3:34 PM

@RNCResearch - RNC Research

Why does Biden always look so confused? https://t.co/wSN2V4oUZk

Saved - November 2, 2023 at 2:40 AM

@RNCResearch - RNC Research

Again — he's not playing with a full deck, folks https://t.co/nob1hTSssC

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the impact of meeting survivors and first responders in the context of political coverage. They mention spending an hour and a half with victims of mass shootings and express uncertainty about the circumstances surrounding these incidents. The speaker acknowledges that the defense department believes there may be a different explanation for these events and mentions intercepting some information. They clarify that they are not suggesting Hamas intentionally caused the shootings but allude to a previous occurrence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But the nature not when the political coverage that look. Some of the political players and some of the Let me ask rhetorical question. No. Anyway. Can you talk about the impact of meeting the survivors and first responders? That's all first. Look. I I spent an hour and a half about 17 or 18 before, something and I don't know how to say this. Virtually every mass shooting, every the circumstance where large number of people have been victimized and lost, I spoke our defense department says it's highly unlikely that it was really a different footprint, and they've intercepted some anyway. And, so that's why I even noticed I didn't say it first. I didn't I wanted to make sure that I knew. And look. And I'm not suggesting that Hamas deliberately did it either it's that old thing, got a little high. You know, and and it's not the first time
Saved - November 12, 2023 at 2:37 AM

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

Who’s this guy? https://t.co/2KcLDt87hF

@Beans84811745 - TrustNoOne

@DecentFiJC https://t.co/ReaCFIIuWv

Saved - November 17, 2023 at 8:25 AM

@77HERCULES77 - We the People…

Joe Biden is Not the President! https://t.co/YcVilEOV9A

Video Transcript AI Summary
The accounting center was moved from the courthouse in Media, Pennsylvania to the Wharf in Chester, Pennsylvania at a cost of $2.1 million. The center is located in a parking lot near loading docks and has connections to Power HRG and Super Youth Park Soccer Stadium. There were concerns about a backroom where there were no observers and no transparency. It took a lawyer's injunction to gain access, but even then, they were only allowed 5 minutes every 2 hours. The speaker emphasizes the importance of transparency, truth, and the ability to question those in power without fear. They hope for swift justice for anyone involved in fraudulent activity. The speaker believes that the public deserves to know the truth and that the country needs defending.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The $2,100,000 spent to move the accounting center from the courthouse in Media, Pennsylvania, which has been something that has been done for for decades, to the Wharf in Chester, Pennsylvania. Let me explain to you the layout of the accounting center. It is in the middle of a huge parking lot, which sits back on Seaport Drive next to loading docks. It has multimillion dollar connections to the company Power HRG and Super Youth Park Soccer Stadium. The accounting center was on the 1st floor in which there were multiple places to bring in ballots in and out of elevators in many rooms in which workers had access. I was there for 3 straight days. What became of concern was the backroom which had had no observers, no line of sight or transparency into the process. There was no cooperation, complete resistance from election night and every day after. It took until our lawyer got an injunction to get into that backroom in which pre canvassing was transpiring. Even with an injunction which was a joke, we were granted 5 minutes every 2 hours, and the setup was sitting in a chair 20 feet from any physical ballot. I truly wish I had enough time today to to recreate what I witnessed and felt during those moments. But we did not gather here today just for me and my experience, but rather a collection of experience experiences from Americans like myself. What I hope to achieve is for the public to understand is what we is that we have stuck our necks out, have been intimidated, threatened, bullied, has spent countless hours away from our families, friends, and jobs. We have signed affidavits under penalty of perjury, which should be consideration enough to know that this is a very serious issue. I'm here for one thing only and that is to speak the truth. This is not about party. This is about my country. Every American deserves transparency, truth and be able to question those in power without fear of intimidation, bullying or backlash. I hope this committee takes action if needed, and justice will be swift to anyone involved in fraudulent activity. The republic is angry, disgruntled, tired, beaten up, and ready to defend this country.
Saved - January 24, 2024 at 8:56 PM

@Ann_Lilyflower - 🕊 𝓐𝓷𝓷 𝓲𝓼 𝓡𝓲𝓰𝓱𝓽 🕊 𝐗𝐋𝐕

Who did this? 🧐 Walk like a Joe Biden..🎶🎵 😆🤣🤣 https://t.co/dtZHYDxijZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The American president, Joe Biden, has a unique way of walking. He spins around and falls to the ground when he boards a horse. Some people find it entertaining, while others are tired of it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The American president is Speaker 1: Walk like Joe Biden. Speaker 0: And when he boards a horse one, he spins around and he hits the floor. He's got the moves. Oh, he hits the deck and he hits some more. All the dems are so sick of Joe. Speaker 1: Walk like a Joe Biden. Walk like a Joe Biden.
Saved - November 29, 2023 at 12:06 PM

@Vision4theBlind - Vision4theBlind

Is this Stephen Colbert? https://t.co/6ccnAFSuZr

Saved - December 26, 2023 at 1:30 AM

@MustangMan_TX - Texas

Joe Biden exposed as the real white supremacist! https://t.co/F12JMDWHs2

Video Transcript AI Summary
White supremacy is identified as the most dangerous terrorist threat to the homeland. The speaker questions Joe Biden's stance on white supremacy and highlights his age and association with the KKK grand wizard, Robert Byrd. They mention Biden's past comments about corn pop and his role in the incarceration of young black men for crack cocaine possession. The speaker contrasts this with the lack of consequences for Hunter Biden's drug-related activities. They challenge the perception of who is truly racist or a white supremacist.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As the most dangerous terrorist threat to our homeland is white supremacy. Yeah. White supremacy, that's the biggest threat to our homeland right now. Benny, your reaction. Joe Biden's white supremacy? Like, that's my question. Like, Joe Biden was you having to use, like, a pocket catheter in the declaration of independence. Like, he's so old. He's a a literal political fossil in America that has sided with the KKK grand wizard. His name was Robert Byrd. He held he eulogized Robert Byrd. Joe Biden's the man who, like, talks about going after corn pot. Joe Biden wanted to kill a black guy because he had too much pomade in his hair. I will say finally that Joe Biden is also a man who put hundreds of thousands of young black men in jail for having A satilla amount of crack cocaine in their pockets, yet you have like a mount Everest style pile of cocaine crack rocks in Hunter Biden's boudoir, yet nothing happens to him. So tell me who's a real racist? Who's a real white supremacist? And you ain't black.
Saved - December 27, 2023 at 1:23 PM

@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra

Is Joe Biden the president? https://t.co/nJcIK1ekqi

Video Transcript AI Summary
Joseph R. Biden is the president of the United States, according to Speaker 1. Speaker 0 asks if he was duly elected and is lawfully serving, to which Speaker 1 simply repeats that he is the president without addressing the specific language used.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is Joseph r Biden of Delaware the duly elected and lawfully serving president of the United States of America? Speaker 1: He is the president of this country. Speaker 0: Is he the duly elected and lawfully serving president of the United States? Speaker 1: He is the president of our country. Are you answering that Speaker 0: omitting the language duly elected and lawfully Fully serving Speaker 1: purposefully? I'm answering the question, he is the president of the United States. Speaker 0: And you have no view as whether he was duly elected or is lawfully serving. Speaker 1: I'm telling you he's the president of the United States.
Saved - January 14, 2024 at 6:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
John Fetterman mocks Bob Menendez and urges him to resign from the Senate. The author questions Fetterman's sudden eloquence and expresses skepticism towards politicians. Thoughts?

@Ann_Lilyflower - 🕊 𝓐𝓷𝓷 𝓲𝓼 𝓡𝓲𝓰𝓱𝓽 🕊 𝐗𝐋𝐕

BREAKING: John Fetterman Makes Fun Of 'Victim' Bob Menendez, Calls For 'Sleazeball' To Leave Senate What concerns me is that all of a sudden, John Fetterman suddenly sounds so amazing and speaks fast without any stuttering. I seriously do not believe any of these installed politicians. What are your thoughts? 🤔

Video Transcript AI Summary
A senator forcefully denies allegations against him and accuses the government of manipulating the media. Another person agrees with the senator's claims but also criticizes him for not resigning. The senator accuses his colleagues of acting politically and defends his engagement with foreign governments. The person dismisses the senator's speech and suggests he should focus on his trial. They question why the senator is still being paid attention to despite severe accusations against him. The person also discusses the tendency for senators to support each other in times of trouble. They find it strange that the senator has not been expelled despite being accused of being a foreign agent for two Middle Eastern nations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm sorry I'm gonna end Speaker 1: this up. To the went to the senate floor today, forcefully denied the allegations against him, and said the government is Speaker 0: trying to manipulate the media. Speaker 2: I know. We're doing it. Speaker 0: What's your thought? Speaker 2: Oh, I know. Yeah. He's a victim. Yeah. He's a victim. But but, hey, I've been calling for that sleazeball has to go. And I don't know why we have to get rid of Santos, and we would keep somebody like him around. Speaker 0: He accused his colleagues, I guess, that that would include yourself, who called on him to resign or to leave congress of, acting politically. What do you say to his accusation? Speaker 2: No. I I think it's I think it's my aversion to, gold bars in your mattress and and over half $1,000,000 stuffed around your and changing, your mind about, hey, which which $24,000 launch am I gonna get? It's just strange. And now when you're pulling at 4%, why are you hanging around at this point? You have no, future. But, I can't imagine why we can keep him around. Speaker 1: He said that this would chill standard engagement with governments from members of congress that if someone wants Speaker 0: to work with Israel to try to refresh the iron dome, that that's no different than Speaker 1: what he's doing. That was his on the senate Speaker 2: floor. He shouldn't be on the floor of the senate. Shouldn't be giving a speech about anything. You know, he should be, at home back in New Jersey and working about his his betrayal or excuse me, his trial and his defense. Speaker 0: I think that he probably Speaker 2: should I don't know why he's even who's paying attention to him at this point? Speaker 0: Do you do you think some senators, because this is custom in the senate, kinda close ranks regardless of party, regardless of how they really feel because when somebody gets in trouble. Speaker 2: I don't These are like, you Speaker 0: know, there we go but for the grace of god. Speaker 2: I I don't speak for anybody else or whatever but, I, I I can't seem very clear. It's it's people in in congress decided that we have to expel Santos and they did that. And somebody that is more accused of much much more severe and sinister things. And now he's now been accused of being a, foreign agent for now 2 nations. Two nations in the Middle East. What's he still doing here? It's it's it's bizarre it's bizarre to me. So
Saved - January 25, 2024 at 8:38 PM

@RNCResearch - RNC Research

Election Denier Joe Biden: "Hello, Virginia! And the real governor, Terry McAuliffe!" https://t.co/NFU7Uqu0ja

Saved - April 24, 2024 at 4:14 PM

@EL4USA - 💋Elissa4Real💋

Joe Biden finally speaks the truth! https://t.co/EQEnXSXo5S

Saved - May 15, 2024 at 10:14 AM

@Travis_4_Trump - 🇺🇸Travis🇺🇸

Did you see Biden’s new campaign ad? (Satire) https://t.co/ArAAn8jEaP

Video Transcript AI Summary
He's old, has dementia, can't lead, and lies. Barely speaks English, sniffs children. Gets lost, takes long routes. Struggles to walk in the White House.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He's an old guy, has dementia, can't lead us, and the country is screwed. Tell some big lies, Barely speaks English, sniffs children. And their mom's here too, goes the long way. When he leaves his speeches, gets lost each day. In the White House when walking is hard?
Saved - June 29, 2024 at 11:14 PM

@_BruceBane - Bruce Ballou 🇺🇸

Have you seen this? Was Joe being fed lines at the debate? https://t.co/8SdlEvR6Qe

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the debate, a couple noticed strange audio in Joe Biden's speech. They heard someone prompting him to speak. Upon closer inspection in Ableton, it was clear that there was indeed another voice feeding lines to Joe. The couple shared their discovery, questioning if Joe was being fed lines during the debate.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: During the debate, this guy and his wife noticed something really weird in Joe Biden's audio. Check this out. Speaker 1: I swear to God I heard someone say something. Let's see what your numbers are when the selection is over. Let's see. You're a whiner. Oh, my god. Speaker 0: So I wanted to take a deeper look at it. So I brought it into Ableton so we can look at the part in between the words when this is over and we'll see. And you can see right here, there's actually some audio. It sounds like somebody's actually speaking and telling Joe what to say. So let's enlarge that and take a listen. So you can see see right here, somebody's telling Joe what to say. Let's Speaker 1: see. Let's see. You're a whiner. Oh my god. Speaker 0: And this is not to sway you in either way, but this is just showing you a discovery that was made. But what do you guys think? Was Joe being fed lines while he was doing the debate?
Saved - July 22, 2024 at 3:18 PM

@StephenM - Stephen Miller

Who is running the country? Not Joe, not Kamala. https://t.co/c01QONqfWE

Video Transcript AI Summary
Joe Biden will not drop out of the race. He is determined to win and will continue running.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's Joe Biden gonna do? Is he gonna stay in the race? He's gonna drop out? Here's my I am running, and we're gonna win. I'm not gonna change that.
Saved - July 25, 2024 at 3:23 PM

@amuse - @amuse

Biden grew a few inches while he was missing for five days… https://t.co/oLkANz941o

Saved - July 28, 2024 at 11:29 PM

@DonaldJTrumpJr - Donald Trump Jr.

"JD Vance is weird" - Team Kamala Harris https://t.co/avMgy4Kp8M

Saved - March 6, 2025 at 7:19 PM

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

What happened to "FIERY" Joe Biden? https://t.co/b3I2BdrLaq

Video Transcript AI Summary
I came here tonight to show the way forward, emboldening others and ensuring everyone has a fair shot. We're guaranteeing rights and federal help for builders, and we're watching auto jobs to instigate collection. My administration is pursuing a career in service. People had questions about my age and ability, but I put those to rest. Anyone who watched that speech saw strength. I'm strong at the beginning, in the middle, and at the end. I'm not "Sleepy Joe," but I am fiery, ready to win this election and have a great second term. There's no other path that guarantees Palestinians can live in peace with dignity. Hamas can end this conflict by releasing hostages and laying down arms. To my Republican friends, what freedom else would you take away? The incumbent president shows no signs of slowing down. I want competition with China, not conflict.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Biden's fiery state of the union address. Speaker 1: I'm here to tonight to show what I believe is the way forward. Speaker 0: He was absolutely on fire. Joe Biden was on fire. You were on You brought that Irish fire tonight. Fired us all up. Biden was on fire. At the top of his game. He's on fire. Smoking. He's on fire. Robust and clear. Speaker 1: Joining us to light is Latoya Beasley. Embolding others to do what they wish. Big landlords who use antitrust law who using antitrust who break antitrust laws to make every sure everyone has a fair shot. RGTP is up. I believe Roe V Ray got it right. Guarantee the right to ABF. So builders can get federally financing. Federal help is over a trillion dollars. A million dollar a million dollars. Millions of families can get they need to go to work watching auto job jobs in the future to and and to instigate the re the the collection. Speaker 0: Joe Biden's fiery and energetic Fiery and energetic. Energetic and fiery. Energetic and fiery. Fiery, energized. That fiery energy. Biden was energetic and fiery. High energy and fiery. Speaker 2: He had that fire in the belly. Speaker 0: He's afraid Speaker 2: of me. Speaker 0: He had that fire in the belly. Speaker 2: Stamina and the fire in the belly. Speaker 0: He clearly has the stamina. He has the stamina. And the energy. The energy. The fire in the belly. To show that he has the energy and the fire in the belly to serve another term. Speaker 1: Pursue a care a career in service. Speaker 0: And none of us are talking about age this morning because of the fiery performance. Look. People have had a lot of questions about president Biden, whether it's about his age or ability, but I think he put those to rest last night. I think it was fiery. Very fiery. It was forceful. Forceful. Forceful. Fiery. Forceful. Forceful and fiery. State of the Union. Forceful. Biden was forceful. Joe Biden forcefully answered the pundits who say he is too old. Speaker 3: Anyone who watched that speech saw Biden is strong. Speaker 0: His voice was strong. Strong. So strong. Speaker 4: Very strong. Speaker 0: He seemed to get stronger. Like, the stronger he is, the stronger he gets. Strong. Strong at the beginning. Strong in the middle. Strong at the end. Strongest speech. Really projected. A strength. With strength. Pretty strong. Speaker 2: Strong and oysters. Speaker 0: Very strong. Really strong. Biden proved he has the strength and mental agility to be an effective president. President Biden's fiery state of the union speech. The man Trump belittles as sleepy Joe seemed quite fiery. So much sleepy Joe. He wasn't sleepy Joe Biden, but he was fiery. President Biden's fiery. Speaker 2: Fiery state of the union address. Speaker 3: And if you watch that speech, you'd have no doubts Biden is gonna win this election and then have a great second term. Speaker 1: There's no other path that guarantees Palestinian can live in peace with pot with peace and dignity. Speaker 0: I thought he was extraordinary in terms of articulating. Speaker 1: It's transformative in you ham humanitarian crisis. Overwhelmingly benefit the clapping 1%. Speaker 2: Biden articulating very clear. Speaker 1: Hamas ended this conflict by releasing hostages, laying down arms could end By by releasing the hostages, laying down arms, and surrendering Speaker 0: He could not have made it clearer. He could not have done it better, and he did an unbelievable job last night. Speaker 1: Well, I've always been known I've always known what endures toward an enduring more something more enduring. Speaker 0: So powerful. So powerful. Speaker 1: I would respectfully say to suggest my my Republican friends, my god, what freedom else would you take away? Speaker 0: A very powerful, last night. Speaker 1: He feels political win. Speaker 0: He grew to the be Speaker 1: a political win for me. Speaker 2: One of the finest moments of Joe Biden's presidency. Speaker 1: The leadership of Israel, I say this. I'd be a winner. Not really. Speaker 0: The incumbent president shows no signs of slowing down. Biden's commanding an energetic speech, energetic, Speaker 1: and fiery. Energetic and fiery. Fiery. Speaker 0: Fiery. An energetic state Speaker 1: of the union. Speaker 0: Fiery and energetic fiery. Fiery often speech. Fiery and at times combative speech. Times combative speech. Fiery and combative. Fiery combative. He was fiery. He was combative. So does he be combative? And fiery this credibly feisty fiery Fiery president Biden. Speaker 1: But Israel has a Speaker 0: A fiery speech. A fiery address. Fiery. Speaker 4: Fiery. Fiery. Fiery speech. Speaker 2: That fiery speech. Speaker 0: Fiery president Biden. Fired up. Fiery state of the union address. President Biden. Fired up. Fired President Biden. Definitely fired up. He fired up. Fired up. Fired Fired up. To fire up. President Biden's fiery state of the union. Fiery state state of the union. Fiery state of the union address. Speaker 1: That Speaker 0: speech was so very fiery. Very fiery. Fiery? Fiery. State of the union. President Biden was quite fiery. Fiery. The president's fiery Fiery. And fiery spirit. Delivering a fiery state of the union address. Fiery. Fiery state of the union address. Off to a fiery start. Often fiery. President Biden was fiery. Delivering a fiery address. Fiery. Fiery. Fiery, president Biden. Fiery. Downright fiery. Fiery State of the Union address. That was a remarkable fiery vigorous guy. Vigorous. Was a vigorous speech. He was vigorous. Vigorous. Vigorous. Speaker 1: He certainly Speaker 0: was vigorous. Very vigorous. Vigorous and fierce. The vigor in his voice. He was vigorous. The vigor. Vigorous. There was no question that he was vigorous. Yeah. There's no question. That was a a vigorous, fiery speech from president Biden. He was on fire. He was on fire last night. That kind of fiery way. Fiery. He's fiery Joe. Keep being fiery. He was fiery. Fiery. Joe Biden. Comfortable. Fiery. Dominant. Chapter eight. Fiery state of the union address. Fiery Fiery state of union address. Fiery state of the union address. Fiery state of Speaker 1: the union. Fiery state of the union. Speaker 0: Biden delivers a fiery state of the union address. Fiery union address. Fiery state of the union speech. Speaker 1: She Speaker 0: was fiery. Fiery. Speaker 1: Fiery. He hit Speaker 0: it out of the park. Home run. The president knocked the speech out of the park. He was fiery. Speaker 1: And our ability to have future children in the future were at risk. That Speaker 0: was just one of president Joe Biden's many fiery messages from his fiery state of the union address. A fiery president Joe Biden. Biden delivering a Speaker 1: fiery state of the union. Speaker 0: Fiery Joe Biden. Delivered a fiery state of the union address. That fiery state of the union address. President Joe Biden came out fiery Speaker 5: Came out fired up. Speaker 0: Came fiery Speaker 5: Came fired fiery Speaker 0: and forced Fiery Joe Biden unleashes a fiery state of the union a fiery state of the union address. Fiery sixty seven minutes. President Biden. Delivering a fiery state of the union address. A fiery and at times combative state of the union address. Delivering a fiery message. Fiery. Fierce and fiery. A fiery state of the union address. Fiery of the union address. Fiery Fiery Fiery speech. Speech. Fiery speech. Democrats hope will put to rest questions about his age and energy. Speaker 4: He he is he is 82 years old, but He Speaker 0: was fiery tonight. Speaker 4: I know their 98 year old guy that I work with, and he's answers his own phone and runs his own business. I mean, Speaker 1: so Mhmm. Speaker 4: It you know, it it he's he did a good job tonight. Speaker 0: President Biden dispelled the narrative that he's too old with a fiery state of the union. Speaker 1: Instead of paying politics, a transformational moment in history happened fifty eight, fifty nine years ago today. But if it's only six months, six weeks, And my message to transgender Americans Speaker 0: Apparently, the word of the night and still this morning seems to be fiery. Speaker 1: Yeah. You are fired. You are fired. Speaker 0: Nobody's gonna talk about cognitive impairment now. Speaker 1: Yeah. You are fired. I want competition with China, not conflict. And we're in a stronger position to win the conflict of the twenty first century against China than anyone else for that matter, than any time as well. Speaker 0: Fresh off that fiery address. Fresh off his fiery State Of The Union address. Fresh off last night's fiery State Of Speaker 2: The Union address. Fresh off that fiery state of the union address. Speaker 0: Fresh off the fiery state of union address. Off of the fiery state of the union President Biden is Fresh off of a fiery state of the union address. The president Fresh off that fiery state of the union address. This fiery state of the union speech Thursday further boosted by a sizzling February jobs report. His fiery state of the union speech Thursday to boost, by a sizzling February jobs report. Further boosted by a sizzling February jobs report Friday. Fresh off his fiery state of the union address. Following his fiery state of the union address. His fiery state of the union message. Fiery state of the union address. His fiery state of the union address. Wasn't he on fire? Speaker 1: Last night, in The US Capitol, the same building where our freedoms came under assault on July. That should be January. I'm coming directly to you for ask a quick favor. Speaker 0: Beautiful video. Wharf. Speaker 3: Whoever made that. It's spectacular. Speaker 0: Man. This was awesome. Speaker 3: Just perfect. Really interesting video. Speaker 0: Matt Orphalia. Matt Orphalia. Matt Orphalia. Matt Orphalia. Orphalia. Orphalia. You almost made me cry. Matt Orphalia. Matarellapa. It's hysterical. It's fantastic. This is the best. Matt Orlefrolo. Matt Orfola. Do I have it right? You know, that's how famous Orfe is.
Saved - November 7, 2024 at 6:39 PM

@MattWallace888 - Matt Wallace

What do you notice about Joe Biden today? https://t.co/dO6FOpe1u3

Video Transcript AI Summary
Wait, that's it? This is weird and creepy. No way! He's happy Trump won! Look at that smile. Joe, where did your 20 million votes go? Can someone ask that? Hey, Libs and press, can you look into this?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wait. That's it? Weird. Creepy. Crazy. No way. Dude, he's happy Trump won. He's happy Trump won. Look at him. He's having a great time. Look at that smile. Joe, where'd your 20,000,000 votes go? Can somebody ask that? Hey, Libs. Hey, press. Can you ask that?
Saved - November 26, 2024 at 3:46 PM

@Skriptkeeper17 - SkriptkeeperElect

Anyone seen Dr Fauci??? https://t.co/mb9IacNp7f

Video Transcript AI Summary
Diego Garcia is linked to the disappearance of the Malaysian plane, which carried scientists from the Texas Institute, some of whom had valuable patents worth $400 million. If these scientists died before their patents were granted, their rights could be transferred to someone else. The patents involved technology that could control people without injections, simply through exposure to a specific scent. This situation highlights a complex and sinister game at play, where significant advancements and potential control mechanisms are suppressed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's one of the most evil, vicious navy bases in the history of the planet. They do stuff that will make look like Santa Claus. Doctor Deanna Garcia. So wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. Sorry. Diego Garcia. That's where that first Malaysian plane is. That's what it went. You had 4 scientists. Twenty scientists, but 4 had filed for patents. It was malady, but they worked out of Austin, Texas for Texas Institute. And the ones behind that plane was Texas Institute to govern born, who made the money. And everybody was stupid enough to believe that a plane, almost a block long, can just disappear. But the electronics we have, all the technology. So we got 4 of those topsiders that had powerful patents worth 4 $100,000,000. So if 1, 2, 3 of us and your brother, 4, we filed for patents. And then there's a friend of yours who's with us. So 5 of us. If we die before the patent is granted, then your brother who wasn't on the plane with us, he knows tomorrow. So those 4 scientists and the 5th person was to call out who couldn't. They were all not. And so what I'm saying is, this is this is a game. And if you can't follow that thread, then you don't you don't see it. It's crazy. But with the suppress it. What were the patents for? Well, the patents was you heard people talk about they're gonna one day inject you and can control you. Well, these guys come up with something they don't have to inject. They just put in this room and you come in and you smell it. Yes. That's what they're for.
Saved - January 13, 2025 at 3:31 PM

@TheBabylonBee - The Babylon Bee

Biden, Did You Know? https://t.co/JMD3MTNl6g

Video Transcript AI Summary
Biden, did you know your policies are leading us to disaster? They are harming our children and punishing the truth. Your church does not align with your actions. Did you know your son has been involved in questionable dealings in Ukraine? Your behavior towards women raises serious concerns. The war continues, debt rises, and inflation is a consequence of your decisions. Your policies are affecting the nation negatively, making our lives seem dull. One day, you will have to answer for these choices.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Biden, did you know that your policies would drive us underwater? Biden, did you know that your policies would trans our sons and daughters? Did you know that your policies will punish what is true. The church that you subscribe to does not subscribe to you. Why did you know? Biden did you know that your baby boy made shady deals in Ukraine? Biden, did you know that your baby boy loves Parmesan and cocaine. Did you know that you shouldn't touch these women like you do When you sniff that little girl's hair, it's borderline me too. The war will cease, the debt increase, and the Didn't you know that your policies would bring about inflation. Biden, did you know that your policies would one day rule the nation? Did you know that your policies make here its rain seem bland? One day you'll have to answer to the great
Saved - January 10, 2025 at 11:46 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a recent episode of the Joe Rogan Experience, Mel Gibson shared two startling medical revelations. He expressed skepticism about Anthony Fauci and criticized the drug Remdesivir, claiming it caused him severe health issues and led to the death of a friend. Gibson also discussed the surprising recoveries of three friends with stage four cancer, attributing their health improvements to antiparasitic drugs like Ivermectin and Fenbendazole. These claims echo anecdotal reports and studies suggesting these substances might have potential in cancer treatment, challenging conventional medical narratives.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Mel Gibson Drops Two Medical Bombshells on the Joe Rogan Podcast Be prepared to have your mind blown. 🧵 THREAD

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

In the final hour of episode #2254 of The Joe Rogan Experience, actor Mel Gibson shared two shocking medical experiences that defy mainstream knowledge. It all started the moment Anthony Fauci’s name lept out of Gibson’s mouth. “I don’t know why Fauci’s still walking around… or at least free,” Gibson remarked before revealing that he had “road rage” after listening to RFK Jr.’s book about Anthony Fauci. Piling on, Joe Rogan quickly dismantled any doubts about the book’s accuracy, arguing that if it were full of lies, RFK Jr. would have been sued into the ground and publicly humiliated. “First of all, people that don’t believe it. How come RFK Jr. didn’t get sued? How come there’s no lawsuits? If there were lies, there would be lawsuits. You’d be publicly humiliated,” Rogan pointed out. “That book is an accurate depiction of what Anthony Fauci did during the AIDS crisis, which probably was an AZT crisis. It wasn’t an AIDS crisis.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Good and evil are evident in certain situations, especially when money is prioritized over lives. There's confusion about why Fauci remains unscathed, despite his controversial actions during the AIDS crisis. Discussions about a book detailing Fauci's history reveal that it was censored, despite selling millions. The narrative surrounding COVID and its origins is questioned, drawing parallels to past misinformation during the AIDS crisis. The idea that scientists can mislead the public is emphasized, with references to absurd explanations for disease origins. The conversation highlights the need to examine the truth behind these health crises, suggesting that the current situation mirrors past events on a larger scale.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is what we're talking about before that there is good and evil. Yeah. And sometimes it manifests itself in a very clear and obvious way. Speaker 1: Mhmm. Speaker 0: And I think that's what that was. That was evil. That was putting people's lives second and putting money first. Speaker 1: Well, I don't know why Fauci is still walking around. Speaker 0: How is that guy still walking around? Speaker 1: I don't get it. Speaker 0: If just people understand the history of the AIDS crisis and what that guy did back then. Speaker 1: Did you read that book? Yeah. Speaker 0: Yeah. I read the book. Speaker 1: I listened to it. Speaker 0: Yeah. I did too. I drove up Speaker 1: to San Francisco, and I listened to it, and I had road rage. Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. Speaker 1: And it was like, woah. How is he still there? Speaker 0: How was first of all, people that don't believe it, how come RFK Junior didn't get sued? Yep. How come there's no lawsuits? Mhmm. If there was lies, there would be lawsuits. Speaker 1: No. But that's true. Speaker 0: You'd be publicly humiliated instead. They kept that book off bestseller lists. That book sold millions of copies. Speaker 1: I know. Speaker 0: They hid it. That's when you find out the bestseller lists are actually curated. It's not really bestseller. Speaker 1: Yeah. It's censored. It's all censored. Everything's censored, you know. Speaker 0: But that book is an accurate depiction of what Anthony Fauci did during the AIDS crisis, which probably was an AZT crisis. Yeah. And now it was an AIDS crisis. Speaker 1: I mean, it's it's fairly incontrovertible now that he Speaker 0: was fooling with gain of function. 100%. And and, you know, it's, Speaker 1: you know, what are the why is he still around? Speaker 0: Right. Or at least free. Right. Right. And no repercussions. Speaker 1: Yeah. Whatever happened to that story where, you know, the wombat and the and the weasel got together and Yeah. Horsing around and a bat pissed on him with a golden shower with you know, it's like and all of a sudden, it was in a wet market. Yeah. Very wet market. You got Speaker 0: you know? Complete total horseshit. Totally. The scientists that we're supposed to to trust Yeah. For pitching that horseshit. Speaker 1: It was like the AIDS thing. Some green monkey bit a Quanta Stewart on the ass, then he went around the world and got everybody sick, and it was, like, you know, ridiculous. Speaker 0: If you wanna go through the AIDS rabbit hole, look up a guy named Peter Duesberg. Speaker 1: Oh, yes. I know. Speaker 0: Yeah. I read that book. Yeah. That is crazy. Yeah. He's telling the truth. This is the fucking COVID crisis times a1000. Speaker 1: Mhmm.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The first bombshell dropped when Gibson shared that he “couldn’t walk for three months” after taking Fauci’s pet drug for COVID. “[Remdesivir] kills you. I found out that afterward. And that’s why I wonder about Fauci,” Gibson said. “Remdesivir is so lethal it got nicknamed ‘Run Death Is Near’ after it started killing thousands of COVID patients in the hospital,” Stella Paul wrote in a previous report. “The experts claimed that remdesivir would stop COVID; instead, it stopped kidney function, then blasted the liver and other organs.” Unfortunately, Gibson’s gardener wasn’t as fortunate. After reportedly receiving the kidney-toxic treatment, he tragically passed away. “I knew the guy for 20 years, and we both went to the same hospital, and he died, and I didn’t,” Gibson lamented. “I think we both got remdesivir, which is not good.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
I contracted COVID from my gardener, who sadly passed away after we both went to the same hospital. We both received remdesivir, which I later learned can cause serious harm, including kidney failure. I struggled to walk for three months afterward. It raises questions about the decisions made by health authorities, especially regarding the restriction of monoclonal antibodies. This seems driven by a desire to promote vaccines for profit, which is deeply troubling. The prioritization of money over human lives is a real and concerning issue.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I got COVID from my gardener, and he had it first, and then I got it. And I was like, did I grab the hose or what? You know, what was I don't know. But, it was, it was I knew the guy for 20 years, and we both went to the same hospital. And he died and I didn't. Jesus. I think we both got remdesivir, which is not good. Speaker 1: Not good. Speaker 0: Not good. Causes kidney failure. I know. I I couldn't walk for 3 months after I had that stuff. Really? Because it kills you. I found that afterwards it kills you. And that's why I wonder about Fauci, you know. Speaker 1: Oh, you should wonder about that Speaker 0: guy. Yeah. Speaker 1: When meanwhile, they were trying to stop people from getting monoclonal antibodies. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 1: Yeah. They've restricted monoclonal antibodies, which is fucking insane because they wanted to promote that vaccine because they wanted to profit off of it, which brings us back again to evil. Mhmm. Evil's real. It's real. Putting money over human lives is evil. Speaker 0: I agree. It's a it's Speaker 1: a real thing and there's a there's a temptation to do it too which is even more crazy.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

While you’re here, please take a few seconds to follow and hit the bell 🔔 more reports like this one.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The most jaw-dropping moment happened when Gibson made a statement that could threaten the entire cancer industry. Gibson revealed that he has three friends who had “stage four cancer,” and now “all three of them don’t have cancer right now at all.” “And they had some serious stuff going on,” Gibson added. Rogan asked, “What did they take?”—to which Gibson hesitantly replied, “They took what you’ve heard they’ve taken.” Being familiar with alternative cancer therapies, Rogan concluded Gibson was talking about antiparasitic drugs Ivermectin and Fenbendazole, which Gibson confirmed with a nod.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I have three friends who had stage 4 cancer, and now they are cancer-free. They used treatments like ivermectin, fenbendazole, and methylene blue, which was originally a textile dye but is now found to have significant effects on mitochondria. It's surprising how many effective treatments are overlooked or demonized, often due to profit motives. Many beneficial substances, such as vitamin D, K2, magnesium, zinc, and quercetin, are not promoted because they lack patent protection and cannot be controlled by pharmaceutical companies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'll tell you a a good story. Okay. I have 3 friends. All 3 of them had stage 4 cancer. All 3 of them don't have cancer right now at all, and they had some serious stuff going on. And what did they take? They took some what you've heard they've taken? Speaker 1: Ivermectin. Fenbendizole. Yeah. That's Yeah. I'm hearing that a lot. Speaker 0: They drank hydrochloride something or other? There's studies on that Speaker 1: now where people have proven that Speaker 0: they took drinking methylene blue and stuff Speaker 1: like that. Yeah. Methylene blue, which was a fabric dye. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. It was a textile dye. And now they find it has profound effects on your mitochondria. Yep. Yeah. This stuff works, man. There's a lot of stuff that does work, which is very strange. Speaker 1: Mhmm. Because, again, it's profit. When you when you hear about things that are demonized and then it they turn out to be effective, you always wonder, well, what is going on here? Mhmm. How is how is our medical institutions? How have they failed us so that things that do cure you are not promoted because they're not profitable? That they can't control it. They don't have a patent on it, whether it's vitamin d, k 2, and magnesium. Yep. You know? Well, yeah. I'm Zinc and quercetin. Speaker 0: All that stuff. Speaker 1: I do all that stuff.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Corroborating what Gibson reported to Rogan, cancer surgeon Dr. Kathleen Ruddy revealed to The Epoch Times last year that she has seen several late-stage cancer patients make dramatic recoveries after taking Ivermectin. One patient had a grim future, and then something remarkable happened. This man had stage four prostate cancer and tried all the conventional protocols before doctors told him that there was nothing they could do. Then, he started taking ivermectin… Within six months, the metastatic lesions began to disappear, and in less than a year, “he was out dancing for four hours” three nights per week, according to Dr. Ruddy. A similar scenario unfolded for another man named Eddie. He was also in bad shape. Eddie was diagnosed with two unresectable esophageal tumors that surgeons wouldn’t go near. He was a smoker, couldn’t swallow, and had lost 40 pounds in a year and a half. “Within a couple of weeks, he sounded stronger. He could swallow. He had gained six pounds. His voice was better,” reported Dr. Ruddy. Several weeks later, Dr. Ruddy said to Eddie, “You need to get a scan.” Guess what happened? “We got the scan. No tumors. Gone. Gone. The problem was that he had sold his fishing boat. That was the biggest problem. He was getting better. His tumor was gone. Now he’s got to buy another fishing boat … I was like, ‘Well, now, that’s interesting.’”

Video Transcript AI Summary
A man in his seventies, who had lost 40 pounds and struggled to swallow and speak, began taking Ivermectin after hearing about its success with prostate cancer. Despite not having insurance and being diagnosed with two unresectable esophageal tumors, he refused chemotherapy and continued with Ivermectin. After a few weeks, he showed significant improvement: he could swallow, his voice returned, and he gained 6 pounds. After some persuasion, he agreed to a scan, which revealed no tumors. His main concern then became finding a new fishing boat after selling his old one.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A second patient crossed my path. A guy in his seventies who had been losing weight for a year and a half, £40, not vaccinated. £40 weight loss. Smoker, drinker. All he does is fish. And he could no longer swallow and he could hardly talk. And so I got on the phone with him and I said, Eddie, you know, tell me a little bit about your history and so forth. He knew someone with prostate cancer who had taken Ivermectin. He cured himself from prostate cancer without. So Eddie began taking Ivermectin. I have no idea what the dosing was. He was just taking it. And I gave him some advice about diet and, you know, try and get the weight back on and so on and so forth. But within a couple of weeks, he sounded stronger. Sounded stronger. He could swallow. He had gained £6. His voice was better. Followed him for the next couple of weeks, maybe another month or so, and I said, Eddie, we need to get a scan. He doesn't have insurance. He doesn't like doctors, whatever. He had been diagnosed in that interval with 2 esophageal tumors, unresectable. Surgeons wouldn't go near it. The, doctor said, well, we'll give you chemo and radiation. And Eddie said, no. You're not. So he takes his ivermectin. Maybe about 6 weeks later, I said, Eddie, you need to get a scan. Had to argue with Eddie to get a scan. We got the scan. No tumors. Gone. Gone. The problem was that he had sold his fishing boat. That was the biggest problem. He was getting better. His tumor was gone. Now he needs to go and buy another fishing boat. That was the second patient. I was like, well, now that's interesting.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Recently, anecdotal reports have also praised Fenbendazole as a potentially miraculous anti-cancer drug. It reportedly works by destabilizing microtubules, the structures that help cancer cells divide and grow. By disrupting this process, Fenbendazole is believed to effectively halt cancer cell division and slow or stop tumor growth.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I am presenting a case series of three patients whose cancers went into remission after taking the antiparasitic drug fenbendazole, as detailed in a paper published in Clinical Oncology Case Reports. Fenbendazole is a veterinary medicine that interferes with microtubule formation during cell division, which may inhibit cancer cell proliferation. This suggests it could be a safe and effective option for cancer treatment. There is an urgent need for drug regulators to consider repurposing fenbendazole for human use, especially since other safe treatments have been approved quickly. Further research is necessary to establish its role as a chemotherapy option. The paper indicates that these three patients experienced significant improvement in their cancer conditions. For more details, refer to the full paper.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now I'm going to be presenting a case series here of 3 patients whose cancers have gone into remission after taking, an antiparasitic drug, fenbendazole. Now this is from this paper here. Fenbendazole, enhancing antitumor effects, a case series, and it's a full paper reviewed in, clinical oncology case reports. And you can download the full paper there. It does contain quite a bit of, medical jargon, but it is quite an intelligible and readable paper. Let's say, bendazole is a cheap and readily available antiparasitic, commonly used veterinary medicine. Now this is it's a bit like, Ivermectin. It's an anti worm medicine. It's in a different group, but it's an anti anti parasitic, medication, and I've used the human form of this, mabendazole and abendazole. I've provided thousands and thousands of doses of Mebendazole and Abendazole to projects around the world where where worm infections are common with with devastatingly brilliant effects and never any recorded side effects reported to me. So it's a drug I've distributed for a long long time in human form, but I stress this is the veterinary form. But it's the same group of drugs as well as well series. So when a cell wants to divide, in mitosis the, the chromosomes kind of line up in the middle here like this, process of mitosis And, and then there's microtubules, like pull these chromosomes into the right half of the cell. So they're like contract and pull them into the right half of the cell. And and then when they're in the right half of the cell, the cell just divides into 2. So I think this is what's happening here. So these drugs are interfering with the formation of these red microtubules. And if you don't have the microtubules that means you can't have cell division. Of course cancer is out of control cell division. So that's in conclusion. Fembendazole appears to be a potentially safe and effective anti neoplastic neo anti neo plastic tissue and so cancer is a neoplastic disease that can be repurposed repurposed for human use. So I think the drug regulators need to start looking at this as a matter of some urgency because people are dying from cancer now to look at this, to look at repurposing this for, human use. When other preparations are safe and effective, they can seem to get those passed really pretty quickly. So if something is safe and effective, surely, it can be accredited for human use by our national authorizing agencies pretty quickly if they want to. Of course, the researchers the writers here say further research is necessary to define a role of, fenbendazole as a chemotherapeutic option. We always need more details. So there we go. Three patients basically basically well, they they basically cured, of the cancers. Read the paper for yourself. That's what they seem to be saying to me.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

A case series published in 2020 documented three cancer patients who experienced complete remission after taking Fenbendazole. The abstract concluded, ‘FBZ (Fenbendazole) appears to be a potentially safe and effective antineoplastic agent that can be repurposed for human use in treating genitourinary malignancies.’” LINK: https://www.scitechnol.com/peer-review/fenbendazole-enhancing-antitumor-effect-a-case-series-2Kms.php?article_id=14307&utm_source=chatgpt.com

Fenbendazole Enhancing Anti-Tumor Effect: A Case Series | SciTechnol Fenbendazole Enhancing Anti-Tumor Effect: A Case Series Abstract Background: Fenbendazole (FBZ) is a cheap and readily available anti-parasitic commonly used in veterinary medicine. FBZ belongs to the benzimidazole drug cla.. scitechnol.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Adding to the growing evidence in support of Fendendazole’s use case against cancer, an Oklahoma man credited his miraculous cancer recovery to the pet med after overcoming terminal small cell lung cancer, defying a less than 1% survival rate and leaving doctors baffled. KOKO 5 News reported in 2019: EDMOND, Okla. — When you tell someone a medicine for dogs cured your cancer, you better be ready for some skeptics, but Joe Tippens says it saved his life, and the lives of others. Now, even cancer researchers are open to the possibility it might be true. "My stomach, my neck, my liver, my pancreas, my bladder, my bones -- it was everywhere," Tippens said. Tippens said he was told to go home, call hospice and say his goodbyes two years ago. The doctors were unanimous, he was going to die of small cell lung cancer. "Once that kind of cancer goes that far afield, the odds of survival are less than 1 percent, and median life expectancy is three months," Tippens said. Tippens said he went from 220 pounds to 110. "I was a skeleton with skin hanging off of it," he said. "It was difficult." But that was January of 2017. Today, Tippens is very much alive and what he credits for his survival has doctors scratching their heads, and the rest of us raising eyebrows. "About half the people think I'm just crazy," he said. "And about half the people want to know more and dig deeper." Tippens said he received a tip from a veterinarian, of all people. And in his desperation, he turned from people medicine to dog medicine. Specifically, something you give your dog when it has worms. "The truth is stranger than fiction, you know?" Tippens said, laughing. Just three months later, Tippens says, his cancer was gone. LINK: https://www.koco.com/article/edmond-man-claims-cheap-drug-for-dogs-cured-his-cancer/27276538?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Video Transcript AI Summary
Joe Tippen, once diagnosed with terminal small cell lung cancer, credits his survival to fimbendazole, a dog dewormer. After being given a grim prognosis and losing significant weight, he turned to this unconventional treatment. Just three months later, he claims his cancer was gone. While some cancer researchers remain skeptical, they acknowledge the need for further investigation into the drug's potential. Tippen also took vitamin E and CBD oil during his treatment and was part of a clinical trial, but he was the only participant to achieve remission. He has shared his story online, gaining both interest and criticism. Despite the controversy, he believes that if his experience helps even one other person, it’s worth it. He plans to continue taking the dewormer for life, as its popularity grows.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When you tell someone that a medicine for dogs cured your cancer, you better be ready for some skeptics. But Joe Tippen says it did save his life and others. And now even cancer researchers are open to the possibility it might be true. Speaker 1: My neck, my liver, my pancreas, my bladder, in my bones. It was everywhere. Speaker 0: 2 years ago, Joe Tippen says he was told to go home, call hospice, and say his goodbyes. The doctors were unanimous. He was going to die of small cell lung cancer. Speaker 1: Once that kind of cancer goes that far afield, the odds of survival are less than 1%, and the median life expectancy is 3 months. Speaker 0: Tippens says he went from £220 to 110, but that was January of 2017. Today, Tippens is very much alive. And what he credits for his survival has doctors scratching their heads and the rest of us raising eyebrows. Speaker 1: About half the people think I'm just crazy and half the people wanna know more and dig deeper. Speaker 0: Tippen says he got a tip. Not from a pharmacist, but a veterinarian. And in his desperation, he turned from people medicine to dog medicine. Specifically, fimbendazole or what you give a dog when it has worms. Speaker 1: Truth is stranger than fiction, you know. Speaker 0: Just 3 months later, Tippen says his cancer was gone. Speaker 2: I'm usually skeptical. I mean, I was and maybe still am about, this one. But there's there's a lot of there's an interesting background to this. Speaker 0: Cancer researchers like Steven Prescott are skeptical, but they also are not dismissing this antiparasitic's potential. He says Tippens is not the first person to potentially benefit and maybe not the last. Speaker 2: Scientists at many credible places have done work on this for years. Speaker 0: But was it the dog dewormer or was it something else? Tippens took the dog medicine with daily vitamin e supplements and CBD oil. He was also taking an experimental cancer fighting drug. But Tippens says out of the 1100 patients on that clinical trial, he was the only one cleared of cancer. Tippen says he was saved by the dog dewormer, and he plans to take it for the rest of his life. Speaker 1: Oh, my insurance company spent $1,200,000 on me with traditional means before I switched to a $5 a week medicine that actually saved me. Speaker 0: Prescott says he's now working with Tippens to organize a case study. Speaker 2: We're gonna do it and see if we can confirm that, in a very rigorous or a clinical study sort of way that these patients had that kind of response. Speaker 0: As for Tippens Speaker 1: I've got now over 40 success stories other than me. Speaker 0: He's sharing his story on an online blog that has already been read more than 100000 times. Most of the feedback, positive or curious. Some though accused Tippens of giving cancer patients false hope. Speaker 1: How do I answer that? I mean, if I've saved one other person other than me, it's worth it to me. Speaker 0: All we know for sure is that Joe Tippens is alive. In time, perhaps we'll also know if this medicine made for man's best friend might also be man's newest cancer cure. Fascinating. You know, when you're in the fight for your life, you don't care what it is. If it works for you, it works. Yeah. Absolutely. And and he says, listen. I'm not a doctor. I'm not an expert. I cannot tell people to take this. I can't. He said, but it worked for me and if somebody else wants to do the same thing, then they can do it too. Interesting thing though is that, you know, he mentioned $5 for that. He says it's actually doubled in price. Because when you tap when you type in fimbendazole in Google, one of the first or second things that pops up is cancer cure. Wow. So the talk is out there. More and more people are catching on, but just incredible story. Evan, thank you.
Edmond man says cheap drug for dogs cured his cancer When you tell someone a medicine for dogs cured your cancer, you better be ready for some skeptics, but Joe Tippens says it saved his life, and the lives of others. koco.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Thanks for reading! If you enjoyed this post, please do me a quick favor and follow this page (@VigilantFox) for more reports like this one. In other news, John Fetterman recently dropped a couple of surprising statements on Fox News. Read more below: https://t.co/lJwfMJgBvj

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

John Fetterman Breaks the Internet With Two Explosive Statements on Fox News It’s not every day that you hear a Democrat saying something like this. 🧵 THREAD https://t.co/OEtuGzLjhv

Saved - February 25, 2025 at 5:19 AM

@420roundabout - SAINTELLE

More shit on that dude from Maine https://t.co/ZJORN8kABx

Video Transcript AI Summary
As governor of Maine, Janet Mills approved Central Maine Power's clear-cutting project through a 45-mile corridor in Western Maine, despite local opposition. This happened a year after her brother, Peter Mills, received $22 million and 670 acres of land on the Dead River through his company, Western Mountains and Rivers Corporation, courtesy of Central Maine Power. The $22 million was intended for the affected towns, but it appears Peter Mills' company pocketed the money. When I reached out to Western Mountains Corp for information on the funds and land, my request was ignored, and no information exists online. This situation is a clear case of political corruption and warrants further investigation. What do you all think?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mills, the current governor of Maine. A year before she took office, her brother, Peter Mills, received $22,000,000 through a shell company called Western Mountains and Rivers Corporation. This company also received 670 acres of land on the Dead River, all courtesy of a company called Central Maine Power. When Janet Mills assumed office a year later, she immediately approved CMP to clear cut in a 45 mile corridor through Western Maine without the endorsement of any of the localities affected who are all in major disagreement with the decision. And that $22,000,000 that was supposed to be spent on the towns appears to have been pocketed by the Shell company run by Peter Mills rather than being spent on the people who was actually supposed to. When I reached out to Western Mountains Corp to verify where the funds were spent and the status of the land, my request was ignored, and there exists no information on the firm's website either. This is a clear example of political corruption in the state of Maine and deserves to be investigated further in my opinion. What do you all think? Janet Mills, the current governor of
Saved - March 7, 2025 at 11:08 AM

@TheLizVariant - TheLizVariant

How long till this guy turns Republican? Any guesses? https://t.co/EHItv48JsI

Video Transcript AI Summary
Do you see the idiocy I'm talking about? Why would 22 Democratic senators echo the same thing, thinking it would resonate with Americans? It just shows how unchanging our democracy's fabric is in the eyes of some officials and their constituents, which is why Trump is in office. Do I have to go to Capitol Hill and give lessons? You don't get it? Elizabeth Warren, Cory Booker, Chuck Schumer—you all get together, put something in a prompter, and say the same thing into a microphone in separate rooms. You think that's going to resonate? Then you wonder why you're no longer in power and why Trump is in the White House.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now you see why Stephen a Smith was in the polls as a presidential candidate? See what I'm talking Speaker 1: about? You see that idiocy right there? You talk about something, people being tone deaf. Why the hell would 22 democratic senators be literally echoing the same thing and think that would resonate with the American people? All it shows is that the same fabric of our democracy is unchanging in the eyes of some of these officials and as a result, the constituency they represent, which is why Donald Trump is in office. What do I have to come up to Capitol Hill and give you lessons? Seriously. You don't get it? All you did Elizabeth Warren, Cory Booker, Chuck Schumer, Let's all get together. Let's put this in a prompter and all together, albeit in separate rules, we'll grab a microphone and say the same damn thing. And that's what's going to resonate with the American people. And then you wonder why you're no longer in power. You wonder why Trump is in the White House.
View Full Interactive Feed