reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@ElonMuskAOC - Elon Musk (Parody)
Congress members annual salary and net worth… Nancy Pelosi Annual salary: $223,000 Net worth: $202 million Mitch McConnell Annual salary: $200,000 Net worth: $95 million How does this make any sense at all? Trading stocks should not be allowed for them or their spouses. It’s horrible.
@unusual_whales - unusual_whales
On December 15, 2021 Nancy Pelosi was asked if Congress should be banned from trading stocks. Her response: "No…. we have a responsibility to report in the stock." https://t.co/2ggy3bubJQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Members of Congress and their spouses trading individual stocks while serving in Congress should not be banned, according to the speaker. However, their stance on the second question is unclear. They believe that there is a responsibility to report, but no further details are provided.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Should members of Congress and their spouses be banned from trading individual stocks while serving Congress? No. I don't know to the second one. Any but we have a responsibility to report
@TheGeneral_0 - General™️👀🇺🇸🦅
Nancy Pelosi is corrupt and benefitted from her own insider knowledge.https://t.co/mirFmRvYW9
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 about accepting a large IPO deal from Visa in 2008 while legislation affecting credit card companies was being discussed. Speaker 1 questions the point of the question and denies any conflict of interest. Speaker 0 insists on whether it was appropriate for a speaker to accept such a deal, but Speaker 1 dismisses it as a false premise. Speaker 0 asks for clarification, and Speaker 1 confirms that they would act upon an investment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanted to ask you why you and your husband, back in March of 2008, accepted and participated in a very large IPO deal from Visa. At a time, there was major legislation affecting the credit card companies making its way through the, through the house. And would you consider that to be a conflict of interest?
Speaker 1: The I I don't know what your point is of your question. Is there some point that you want to make with that?
Speaker 0: Well, I I guess what I'm asking is do you think it's alright for, a speaker, to accept a very preferential and favorable stock deal? Well, we did. And if you participate in the IPO
Speaker 1: Well, I have never met that.
Speaker 0: You were speaker of the house. You don't think it was a conflict of interest or had the appearance
Speaker 1: of a conflict of interest? Which only has appearance if you decide that you're going to Have, elaborate on a false premise, but it it it's not true, and that's that.
Speaker 0: I don't understand what part's not true.
Speaker 1: Yes, sir. That that I would act upon an investment. Yes.
reSee.it AI Summary
In September 2021, young investors discovered a new strategy: monitoring Rep. Nancy Pelosi's financial disclosures. User 'ceowatchlist' dubbed her the stock market's biggest whale. Interestingly, Nancy Pelosi was named Wall Street's Trader of The Year, but her stock trades have been faltering since Kevin McCarthy became Speaker of the House. Insider trading suspicions arise.
@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives
Dear Nancy Pelosi, It took me 8 hours to find this video that was removed on the internet. On September 21, 2021, Young investors found a new strategy: watching financial disclosures of Rep. "Shouts out to Nancy Pelosi, the stock market's biggest whale," said user 'ceowatchlist.' Nancy Pelosi was named Wall Street’s Trader of The Year the same year. Insider Trading? Ever since Kevin McCarthy became the Speaker of House her stock trades have been failing.
Video Transcript AI Summary
TikTokers are using Nancy Pelosi's stock trading disclosures as a strategy for trading stocks. They believe that Pelosi's trades, made by her husband and disclosed by her, have been successful. A social investing platform called Iris allows users to receive push notifications whenever Pelosi's stock trading disclosures are released. Some users even buy stocks based on her trades. Pelosi's spokesperson claims that she does not personally own any stocks and has no involvement in the transactions. However, critics argue that her and her husband's annual returns are too successful to be mere coincidence. The video also discusses how Democrats, despite claiming to support the working class, actually represent the wealthy elite. They highlight the increase in billionaires' net worth during the COVID pandemic and the failure of Democrat policies to help the poor.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: TikTokers are trading stocks by copying what members of congress do. And when they say copying what members of congress do, they mean specifically, Nancy Pelosi. Take a look at these pictures. The queen of investing just spent 300 k on this stock. The real trades of Nancy Pelosi.
US is nearing an agreement to purchase a supercomputer made with Nvidia And AMD chips. Young investors have a new strategy. Watching financial disclosures of sitting members of congress for stock tips. And you notice how leftist NPR is titling this Whole thing as watching members of congress for stock tips. What they really mean every time they say that is Nancy Pelosi.
Among a certain community of individual investors on TikTok, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's stock trading disclosures are a treasure trove. Shouts out to Nancy Pelosi, the stock market's biggest whale, said user CEO watch list. Another said, I've come to the conclusion that Nancy Pelosi is a psychic. While adding that she is the queen of investing. She knew declared Chris Josephs.
Analyzing a particular trade in Pelosi's financial disclosures, and you would have known if you had followed her portfolio. Last year, Joseph's noticed that the trades actually made by Pelosi's investor Her husband and merely disclosed by the speaker were performing well. Joseph is the co founder of a company called Iris, which shows other people's stock Trades, in the past year and a half, he has been taking advantage of a law called the stock act, which requires lawmakers to disclose their stock trades and those of their spouses within 45 days. Now on Joseph's social investing platform, you can get a push notification every time Pelosi's stock trading disclosures are released. He is personally investing when he see Stocks are big.
I'm at the point where if you can't beat them, join them, Joseph's told NPR, adding that if he sees trades on her disclosures, I typically do buy. The next one she does, I'm gonna buy. A Pelosi spokesperson said that she does not personally own any stocks, and that the transactions are made by her husband. The speaker has no Higher knowledge or subsequent involvement in any transaction. And I mean, give me a break.
You're telling me Nancy Pelosi, who has a personal net worth of 1,000,000 upon 1,000,000 combined with her husband, probably 200,000,000 plus, has absolutely no prior knowledge or Any involvement in any of the transactions whatsoever? It just happens to be coincidence that her and her husband experienced absolutely unprecedented, Incredible and I mean incredible annual returns. Well, somehow, almost every single year picking incredible winners in the market. Give me a break, please. I don't know about you guys, but that response to the press from Nancy Pelosi spokesperson, screams guilty to me.
It screams plausible deniability. It seems pretty much as dishonest everything else Nancy Pelosi does and says, it invokes imagery of a mafiosodon, who's involved in all kinds of criminal activity, but the feds just can't get any actual concrete evidence on him, and he's taunting. And so clearly something fishy is going on with Nancy Pelosi's annual returns. But where I really want to go is with this one Specific thing that Democrats continue to say. Joe Biden even uses it as a regular talking point.
Speaker 1: The idea that the stock market is booming is his only measure of what's happening. Where I come from in Scranton and Claymont, the people don't live off of the stock market.
Speaker 0: Now, first of all, regular people certainly don't live off the stock market, but they definitely do retire off of But this idea that Democrats are for the little guy, and that their policies are targeted towards making your life better is a complete fallacy. It's What they run on nonstop. Bernie Sanders just tweeting, why is it that the build back better plan is so ruthlessly opposed by the entire ruling class of this country? Answer, because with this bill, we are showing that the government can deliver the needs of the working class, not just billionaires and corporations. It Sounds nice.
It makes you feel all warm and fuzzy inside, but reality is the complete opposite. Have Democrats become the party of the rich? If you're waiting for Democrats to talk as frankly about Wealth as they do about race. Don't hold your breath. Democrats are the party of the wealthy, IRS data shows.
Democrats represented sixty 5% of taxpayers with household incomes of 500,000 or more in 2020, while 74% of taxpayers in Republican districts have household incomes less than 100 Thousand. Despite AOC's infamous dress, Democrats are getting cold feet on actually taxing the rich. They talk a big game. They pretend as if they Hair. But the reality is their policies do absolutely nothing but enrich the most wealthy in the country.
You know, Janet Yellen continues to talk about how important it is that they raise the debt ceiling. Otherwise, the markets are gonna crash. It's gonna be total calamity. But who exactly are the people benefiting from all the money printing? Is it regular people whose savings are getting wiped out?
Whose salaries are worth less and less each and every single month? Or is it the fact The endless money printing is essentially keeping the stock market alive. There's a reason people are starting to write these articles. Stock market to Crash when central bank stop printing? There's a reason when you look at the S&P 500, and you see how it's continuously hitting absolute peak Guys, is that just because the economy is doing so incredibly well under Biden?
Or is that because this administration and the treasury is subsidizing markets? Take a look at this chart right over here, which shows you the average p e ratio of the S and P 500 from the late 1800 to now. A p e ratio is a way of looking at The stock market and being able to analyze it within historical context. It's a ratio of the share price and the earnings per share. You will notice a heavy spike in PE ratios in 2000, which was of course the dotcom bubble.
In 2008, 2009, which is of course the 2008 market crash. And now in 2020 after Joe Biden took office, the S and P five 100 average PE ratio is above 30 at 34.20 Five as of now. The median PE ratio is 15. The markets are more than double the median, and it seems to me an upward trend. And what do you think that means?
If the average PE ratio of the S and P 500 is so high right now, it means that stocks are inflated. They're worth more than they're actually worth. And that right there is The exact reason why Democrats care so much about the debt ceiling, and the endless printing of money. It has nothing to do with providing social programs for anyone. It's about keeping the market on life support, and it's about further devaluing the American dollar.
Who benefits from all of this? Who benefits if there's an Absolute economic calamity, a catastrophe, a major crash. Not the regular folk who will get wiped out, which is inevitably coming. It's once again the billionaire class Who benefits from all this inflation and an endlessly growing stock market bubble or the price of real estate continuing to climb at absurd rates? Once again, it's not the little guy.
Democrat policies are at the core of all of this. Take the COOP pandemic for instance. The democrats continue to market what they're doing based on Saving lives. They're just trying to save Meemaw. Well, of course, not Meemaw who visited the capital.
She's still in solitary confinement, but you get what I mean. You got a sacrifice to Save grandma. You think that it's just a coincidence that billionaires saw their net worth increase by half of a $1,000,000,000,000 during the COVID pandemic? An over five $1,000,000,000 increase in net worth, and this article is from October 30, 2020. It's probably even higher now.
You think that's just a random coincidence? You think it's a coincidence that Democrat policies in every Democrat state, every Democrat major city happened to make the poor much more poor and the wealthy richer Exponentially, it's of course by design. The Democrats are the party of the wealthy elite. And if you voted for Joe Biden thinking he was gonna Increase taxes on the most wealthy in the country. While the most wealthy in the country, big bankers, Wall Street, tech CEOs in general, We're donating to Joe Biden's campaign because they wanted so badly to increase their own taxes.
If you bought that for even a second, Then, I don't know if you can be helped. That's what I got for you guys though. If you enjoyed this video, please make sure to leave a like, a comment, subscribe, and share it as much as possible. I gotta get back to work though. Thanks for watching, and I'll see you on the next
reSee.it AI Summary
A user expressed frustration over a video being removed and accused Nancy Pelosi of insider trading. Another user suggested an account dedicated to tracking Pelosi's stock trades.
@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives
Dear Nancy Pelosi, It took me 8 hours to find this video that was removed on the internet. On September 21, 2021, Young investors found a new strategy: watching financial disclosures of Rep. "Shouts out to Nancy Pelosi, the stock market's biggest whale," said user 'ceowatchlist.' Nancy Pelosi was named Wall Street’s Trader of The Year the same year. Insider Trading? Ever since Kevin McCarthy became the Speaker of House her stock trades have been failing.
Video Transcript AI Summary
TikTokers are using Nancy Pelosi's stock trading disclosures as a strategy for trading stocks. They believe that Pelosi's trades, made by her husband and disclosed by her, have been successful. Users on social investing platforms receive push notifications when Pelosi's disclosures are released and often buy stocks based on her trades. Pelosi's spokesperson claims that she has no personal involvement in the transactions. However, critics argue that her and her husband's consistent high returns seem suspicious. The video also discusses how Democrats, despite claiming to support the working class, are actually the party of the wealthy. They highlight the increase in billionaires' net worth during the pandemic and argue that Democrat policies benefit the wealthy elite.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: TikTokers are trading stocks by copying what members of congress do. And when they say copying what members of congress do, they mean specifically, Nancy Pelosi. Take a look at these pictures. The queen of investing just spent 300 k on this stock. The real trades of Nancy Pelosi.
US is nearing an agreement to purchase a supercomputer made with Nvidia And AMD chips. Young investors have a new strategy. Watching financial disclosures of sitting members of congress for stock tips. And you notice how leftist NPR is titling this Whole thing as watching members of congress for stock tips. What they really mean every time they say that is Nancy Pelosi.
Among a certain community of individual investors on TikTok, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's stock trading disclosures are a treasure trove. Shouts out to Nancy Pelosi, the stock market's biggest whale, said user CEO watch list. Another said, I've come to the conclusion that Nancy Pelosi is a psychic. While adding that she is the queen of investing. She knew declared Chris Josephs.
Analyzing a particular trade in Pelosi's financial disclosures, and you would have known if you had followed her portfolio. Last year, Joseph's noticed that the trades actually made by Pelosi's investor Her husband and merely disclosed by the speaker were performing well. Joseph is the co founder of a company called Iris, which shows other people's stock Trades, in the past year and a half, he has been taking advantage of a law called the stock act, which requires lawmakers to disclose their stock trades and those of their spouses within 45 days. Now on Joseph's social investing platform, you can get a push notification every time Pelosi's stock trading disclosures are released. He is personally investing when he see Stocks are big.
I'm at the point where if you can't beat them, join them, Joseph's told NPR, adding that if he sees trades on her disclosures, I typically do buy. The next one she does, I'm gonna buy. A Pelosi spokesperson said that she does not personally own any stocks, and that the transactions are made by her husband. The speaker has no Higher knowledge or subsequent involvement in any transaction. And I mean, give me a break.
You're telling me Nancy Pelosi, who has a personal net worth of 1,000,000 upon 1,000,000 combined with her husband, probably 200,000,000 plus, has absolutely no prior knowledge or Any involvement in any of the transactions whatsoever? It just happens to be coincidence that her and her husband experienced absolutely unprecedented, Incredible and I mean incredible annual returns. Well, somehow, almost every single year picking incredible winners in the market. Give me a break, please. I don't know about you guys, but that response to the press from Nancy Pelosi spokesperson, screams guilty to me.
It screams plausible deniability. It seems pretty much as dishonest everything else Nancy Pelosi does and says, it invokes imagery of a mafiosodon, who's involved in all kinds of criminal activity, but the feds just can't get any actual concrete evidence on him, and he's taunting. And so clearly something fishy is going on with Nancy Pelosi's annual returns. But where I really want to go is with this one Specific thing that Democrats continue to say. Joe Biden even uses it as a regular talking point.
Speaker 1: The idea that the stock market is booming is his only measure of what's happening. Where I come from in Scranton and Claymont, the people don't live off of the stock market.
Speaker 0: Now, first of all, regular people certainly don't live off the stock market, but they definitely do retire off of But this idea that Democrats are for the little guy, and that their policies are targeted towards making your life better is a complete fallacy. It's What they run on nonstop. Bernie Sanders just tweeting, why is it that the build back better plan is so ruthlessly opposed by the entire ruling class of this country? Answer, because with this bill, we are showing that the government can deliver the needs of the working class, not just billionaires and corporations. It Sounds nice.
It makes you feel all warm and fuzzy inside, but reality is the complete opposite. Have Democrats become the party of the rich? If you're waiting for Democrats to talk as frankly about Wealth as they do about race. Don't hold your breath. Democrats are the party of the wealthy, IRS data shows.
Democrats represented sixty 5% of taxpayers with household incomes of 500,000 or more in 2020, while 74% of taxpayers in Republican districts have household incomes less than 100 Thousand. Despite AOC's infamous dress, Democrats are getting cold feet on actually taxing the rich. They talk a big game. They pretend as if they Hair. But the reality is their policies do absolutely nothing but enrich the most wealthy in the country.
You know, Janet Yellen continues to talk about how important it is that they raise the debt ceiling. Otherwise, the markets are gonna crash. It's gonna be total calamity. But who exactly are the people benefiting from all the money printing? Is it regular people whose savings are getting wiped out?
Whose salaries are worth less and less each and every single month? Or is it the fact The endless money printing is essentially keeping the stock market alive. There's a reason people are starting to write these articles. Stock market to Crash when central bank stop printing? There's a reason when you look at the S&P 500, and you see how it's continuously hitting absolute peak Guys, is that just because the economy is doing so incredibly well under Biden?
Or is that because this administration and the treasury is subsidizing markets? Take a look at this chart right over here, which shows you the average p e ratio of the S and P 500 from the late 1800 to now. A p e ratio is a way of looking at The stock market and being able to analyze it within historical context. It's a ratio of the share price and the earnings per share. You will notice a heavy spike in PE ratios in 2000, which was of course the dotcom bubble.
In 2008, 2009, which is of course the 2008 market crash. And now in 2020 after Joe Biden took office, the S and P five 100 average PE ratio is above 30 at 34.20 Five as of now. The median PE ratio is 15. The markets are more than double the median, and it seems to me an upward trend. And what do you think that means?
If the average PE ratio of the S and P 500 is so high right now, it means that stocks are inflated. They're worth more than they're actually worth. And that right there is The exact reason why Democrats care so much about the debt ceiling, and the endless printing of money. It has nothing to do with providing social programs for anyone. It's about keeping the market on life support, and it's about further devaluing the American dollar.
Who benefits from all of this? Who benefits if there's an Absolute economic calamity, a catastrophe, a major crash. Not the regular folk who will get wiped out, which is inevitably coming. It's once again the billionaire class Who benefits from all this inflation and an endlessly growing stock market bubble or the price of real estate continuing to climb at absurd rates? Once again, it's not the little guy.
Democrat policies are at the core of all of this. Take the COOP pandemic for instance. The democrats continue to market what they're doing based on Saving lives. They're just trying to save Meemaw. Well, of course, not Meemaw who visited the capital.
She's still in solitary confinement, but you get what I mean. You got a sacrifice to Save grandma. You think that it's just a coincidence that billionaires saw their net worth increase by half of a $1,000,000,000,000 during the COVID pandemic? An over five $1,000,000,000 increase in net worth, and this article is from October 30, 2020. It's probably even higher now.
You think that's just a random coincidence? You think it's a coincidence that Democrat policies in every Democrat state, every Democrat major city happened to make the poor much more poor and the wealthy richer Exponentially, it's of course by design. The Democrats are the party of the wealthy elite. And if you voted for Joe Biden thinking he was gonna Increase taxes on the most wealthy in the country. While the most wealthy in the country, big bankers, Wall Street, tech CEOs in general, We're donating to Joe Biden's campaign because they wanted so badly to increase their own taxes.
If you bought that for even a second, Then, I don't know if you can be helped. That's what I got for you guys though. If you enjoyed this video, please make sure to leave a like, a comment, subscribe, and share it as much as possible. I gotta get back to work though. Thanks for watching, and I'll see you on the next
@DakotaSidwell - D.Sauce (TIE)
@dom_lucre There’s an account onX that is specifically setup to do just that @PelosiTracker_
@WallStreetSilv - Wall Street Silver
Where Nancy Pelosi bought $KRTX. Nothing to see here ... 🔥🔥🔥 Members of Congress can legally trade stocks based on insider information. This is why Nancy keeps running for re-election. https://t.co/P9APYXl4dC
@QuiverQuant - Quiver Quantitative
🚨 Nancy Pelosi has lost $8.9M in the stock market today, per our estimates. She has 45 days to disclose any trades, so we still don't know if she managed to sell before this crash. Follow along for updates. https://t.co/sDFdq34gqF
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
BREAKING 🅱️ Nancy Pelosi is up $2.3 MILLION in the stock market today. Her estimated net worth is now $264 MILLION. https://t.co/IoSpLBu11N
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared that Nancy Pelosi reportedly made $3 million in just 3 hours through insider trading, which is 17 times her annual salary. She also profited $4 million from a single trade. Additionally, she owns a $200,000 Porsche 911 and multiple mansions valued over $5 million each, with her stock portfolio reaching highs of +93%.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
Nancy Pelosi made $3 million dollars in 3 hours insider trading. Thats 17x her annual salary She’s also made 4 million dollars on a single trade, that’s 20x her salary - She owns a $200,000 Porsche 911 - Multiple mansions worth over $5,000,000 apiece - Nancy Pelosi’s stock portfolio has hit all time highs as high as +93%
Video Transcript AI Summary
Nancy Pelosi reportedly made $3 million in just three hours, which is 17 times her annual salary. She owns a $200,000 Porsche 911 and multiple properties valued at over $5 million each. It would take an average person 27 years to earn that amount. Critics argue that her motivations for being in Congress are primarily financial, and she has been successful in accumulating wealth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nancy Pelosi just made $3,000,000 in 3 hours. That's 17 times her annual salary. She owns a $200,000 Porsche 911 in multiple states worth over $5,000,000 apiece. It would take you 27 years to make that much money. She is only in congress to get rich, and she is very good at it.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
In 2021, Nancy Pelosi was asked if Congress should be banned from trading stocks. Her Response: "No… This is a free market." While serving 37 years in Congress with an annual salary of $223,500, she increased her net worth to an estimated $263,000,000. https://t.co/NZneNs1CGi
Video Transcript AI Summary
Should Congress members and their spouses be prohibited from trading individual stocks while in office? I'm not sure about that. We have a duty to report stock trades, but I'm not familiar with the five-month review process. If individuals aren't reporting, they should be held accountable. However, we live in a free market economy, and people should have the right to participate in it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Should members of Congress and their spouses be banned from trading individual stocks while they're in Congress? No, I don't know to the second one. Any we have a responsibility to report in the stock on the stock, but I don't I'm not familiar with that 5 month review. But if people aren't reporting, they should be. Why don't they take it?
Because this is a free market and people we have a free market economy. They should be able to participate in that.
reSee.it AI Summary
I just learned that Nancy Pelosi made 3 million dollars in just 3 hours from insider trading and has profited 4 million on a single trade. She owns a $200,000 Porsche 911 and mansions worth over 5 million each. It's time for senators to pass a bill banning congressional stock trading.
@01Funkytown - .*Funkytown™*.
Nancy Pelosi made 3 MILLION DOLLARS in 3 hours of insider trading. She’s also made 4 MILLION DOLLRS on a single trade. She owns a $200,000 Porsche 911 and mansions worth over $5 MILLION a piece. Senators must pass a bill to ban congressional stock trading and prevent members from profiting from insider knowledge.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Nancy Pelosi reportedly made $3 million in just three hours, which is 17 times her annual salary. She owns a $200,000 Porsche 911 and multiple properties valued over $5 million each. It would take an average person 27 years to earn that amount. This suggests that her primary motivation for being in Congress is financial gain, and she appears to excel at it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nancy Pelosi just made $3,000,000 in 3 hours. That's 17 times her annual salary. She owns a $200,000 Porsche 911 and multiple states worth over $5,000,000 apiece. It would take you 27 years to make that much money. She is only in congress to get rich, and she is very good at it.
reSee.it AI Summary
Nancy Pelosi's net worth has reached a record $240 million, sparking accusations of insider trading from figures like Kash Patel, Joe Rogan, Grant Cardone, and Tucker Carlson, as well as mainstream media. During a 60 Minutes interview, a reporter questioned her about a significant IPO deal with Visa in 2008, coinciding with legislation affecting credit card companies. Pelosi dismissed concerns about conflict of interest, stating, "It only has appearance if you decide that." The discussion highlights serious allegations regarding her actions.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
The net worth of Nancy Pelosi has hit an all time high of $240 million dollars - New Director of The FBI Kash Patel says it’s insider trading - Joe Rogan says it’s insider trading - Grant Cardone says it’s insider trading - Tucker Carlson says it’s insider trading - Even the mainstream media has repeatedly said it’s insider trading Nancy Pelosi becomes unhinged when a reporter on 60 minutes dares question Pelosi about her and her husband trading on insider information and major legislation they were passing Reporter “I wanted to ask you why you and your husband, back in March of 2008 accepted and participated in a very large IPO deal from Visa. In a time, there was major legislation affecting their credit card companies making its way through the house. Did you consider that to be a conflict of interest?” Nancy Pelosi “I don't know what your point is of your question. Is there some point that you want to make with that?” Reporter “Well, I guess what I'm asking is do you think it's alright for a Speaker to accept a very preferential and favorable stock deal?” Nancy Pelosi “Well, we did” Reporter “At that time you were speaker of the house, you don't think it was a conflict of interest or had the appearance of a conflict of interest?” Nancy Pelosi “It only has appearance if you decide that” This is a must watch, Nancy Pelosi is one of the worst criminals this country has ever seen.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Why did you and your husband participate in a large Visa IPO in March 2008, especially with legislation affecting credit card companies at that time? Did you consider it a conflict of interest?
I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make with your question.
Are you suggesting it's acceptable for a speaker to accept a favorable stock deal? You participated in the IPO while being Speaker of the House. Do you believe that wasn’t a conflict of interest or at least appeared to be one?
It only appears that way if you base it on a false premise, which isn’t true.
I’m unclear on which part you find untrue.
Can you clarify?
Yes, I can act upon an investment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanted to ask you why you and your husband, back in March of 2008, accepted and participated in a very large IPO deal from Visa in a time there was major legislation affecting their credit card companies making its way through the through the house. And did you consider that to be a conflict of interest?
Speaker 1: The yeah. I I don't know what your point is of your question. Is there some point that you want to make with that?
Speaker 0: Well, I I guess what I'm asking is do you think it's alright for, a speaker, to accept, a very preferential and favorable, stock deal? Well, we did. And if you participate in the IPO Well, I have many and at the time you were speaker of the house, you don't think it was a conflict of interest or have the appearance of conflict of interest.
Speaker 1: Only has appearance if you decide that you're going to have, elaborate on a false premise. But it it it's not true, and that's that.
Speaker 0: I don't understand what part's not true.
Speaker 1: Yes, sir.
Speaker 0: One more
Speaker 1: time. Act upon an investment. Yes.
reSee.it AI Summary
Nancy Pelosi's net worth is approximately $240 million, with significant assets including a San Francisco residence valued between $8 million and $25 million and a Napa Valley vineyard estimated similarly. Her commercial properties in San Francisco include several with notable assessed values: 45 Belden Place ($1.78 million), 1301 Sansome Street ($7.3 million), 945 Battery Street ($12.7 million), and 222 Kearny Street ($29.3 million). Additionally, there are mentions of more commercial and undeveloped real estate. Notably, Pelosi and her husband reportedly earned over $5 million in a month from trading options.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
The net worth of Nancy Pelosi is just $10 million shy of a quarter of a BILLION dollars. That’s $240,000,000 Here are some of the residential and commercial properties Nancy Pelosi owns - San Francisco, Pacific Heights Residence, Estimated between $8 million and $25 million - Napa Valley Vineyard, St. Helena, Estimated between $5 million and $25 million Commercial Properties in San Francisco: - 45 Belden Place, Assessed value of $1.78 million - 1301 Sansome Street, Assessed value of $7.3 million - 945 Battery Street, Assessed value of $12.7 million - 222 Kearny Street, Assessed value of $29.3 million But that’s not all: There are mentions of additional commercial real estate in San Francisco and undeveloped real estate, but specific values for these properties are not detailed in the sources provided Insider Trading pays extremely well. Nancy Pelosi and her husband once made over $5 million dollars in a single month trading options and another time Pelosi made over 20x her annual congressional salary in just 3 minutes trading stocks
Video Transcript AI Summary
Nancy Pelosi's San Francisco home is valued at $8 million. This 3,000 square foot residence, built in 1938, features 4 bedrooms, 3 bathrooms, and a 420 square foot basement. The Pelosys purchased it in 2007 for just over $2 million. The exterior showcases red brick with a curved wall of windows above the front door.
Additionally, they own another California property worth around $15 million, acquired for just over $2 million in the 1990s. This estate spans 3,000 square feet on 16 acres and includes 3 bedrooms, a pool, and a tennis court.
In 2005, the Napa Valley Planning Commission permitted the Pelosys to operate a winery producing 5,000 gallons annually. Would you choose to live in either of these homes?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is Nancy Pelosi's house in San Francisco worth $8,000,000. This 3,000 square foot home built in 1938 includes 4 bedrooms, 3 bathrooms, and a 420 square foot basement. Pelosi and her husband purchased this house in 2007 for just over $2,000,000 The exterior of the home is in pristine condition with darker tones of red brick, balanced with a curved wall of windows trimmed in white above the front door. This is Nancy's other home in California worth around $15,000,000 that she and her husband bought for just over $2,000,000 back in the nineties. The sprawling 3,000 square foot estate sits on 16 acres of land and includes 3 bedrooms, along with both a pool and a tennis court in the backyard.
In 2005, the Napa Valley Planning Commission granted the Pelosys a permit to operate a 5,000 gallon per year winery. Would you live in either of these houses?
@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill
Nancy Pelosi has a net worth $272M…and still took out a $1.7M ‘Covid Loan’…which was forgiven. While she received this loan…she showcased her $24K fridge. https://t.co/St82f096cv
reSee.it AI Summary
I haven't been in Congress for eight years, and my net worth isn't $83 million. It's frustrating to see misinformation spread, especially when it comes from conspiracy theories. My salary is $174,000 before taxes, and I don't own stocks or a home; I'm still paying off my student debt. If you're going to make claims about my finances, check my public statements first. Not everyone is corrupt like the person you admire.
@IlhanMN - Ilhan Omar
👋🏽 dummy, first of all I haven’t been in Congress for 8yrs and my net worth isn’t $83 million dollars. I know your brain has rotten from the conspiracy theories you are consuming daily but try not to announce your stupidity to the world. My salary is $174,000 before taxes, I don’t have stock or own a home and still paying off my student debt. So if you are going to lie on something that is public, maybe try checking my public financial statements and you will see I barely have thousands let alone millions 🤦🏽♀️. Oh and before I forget, not everyone is as corrupt as the man you worship.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
Nancy Pelosi does it again!! Nancy Pelosi just made 5 TIMES her annual salary TRADING ONE STOCK - She bought into Tempus (TEM) January 14, 2025 - Then the stock was at $32 a share, it's now at $85 a share - Up over 160% in just about a month Again, 5X HER SALARY IN ONE MONTH https://t.co/B77wuU0REA
Video Transcript AI Summary
I know 90% of you will hate me for saying this, but Nancy just made five times her annual salary on one stock. Back in January, she bought shares of Tempest when it was only $32 a share. Now, the stock is at $85 a share, and it's up over 60% in just one month!
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 90% of people are gonna hate me for what I say next, but Nancy just made five times her annual salary on this one stock. She bought into Tempest back in January, then the stock was at $32 a share. Today, it's at $85 a share. It's up over a 60% in just about a month.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve uncovered the troubling reality of Congressional insider trading, particularly focusing on Nancy Pelosi and others who seem to outsmart Wall Street. It all began with Senator Burr's actions in early 2020, selling stocks after receiving private COVID briefings. Pelosi's financial maneuvers, like her early investments in Visa and Tesla, have turned a modest salary into a massive fortune. Despite a system designed for transparency, delayed filings and strategic timing allow these politicians to profit from insider knowledge while maintaining a facade of legality.
@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal
🧵🇺🇸Congress is even more corrupt than you think—The Pelosi Stock Tracker Thread Chris Josephs, the man behind Nancy Pelosi Stock Tracker, just exposed how Pelosi and other politicians are out-trading Wall Street—legally. This isn’t just about smart investing. It’s about insider access, shady sell-offs, and a system rigged in their favor. Here’s how they pull it off👇
@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal
1/ The Scandal That Started It All In February 2020, Senator Richard Burr told Americans not to worry about COVID. Behind the scenes, he was getting private intelligence briefings warning of disaster. Days later, he sold $1.65 million in stocks, tipped off his brother-in-law, and within 30 minutes, they both dumped more shares. This was the moment that blew the doors open on Congressional insider trading.
Video Transcript AI Summary
At 25, I was living in Bali after quitting my finance job in New York. I worked on my family's sports compression product business. After about 6 months, I moved back to Boston, then New Hampshire, where I became a snowboard instructor.
When COVID hit, I moved back in with my family and connected with my co-founders, Brian, Aaron, and Scott, in LA. We built an app that allowed users to follow their friend's stock portfolios. As the co-founder in charge of growth, I built the Nancy Pelosi portfolio, capitalizing on the trend of people calling out politicians for their stock trades, especially during COVID. I remember the Richard Burr situation and how disgusted I was with the corruption. He was investigated, but nothing happened.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To run Nancy Pelosi's stock tracker. It's it's incredible. I'm first of I'm really glad to meet you. Yeah. No.
Appreciate it. That you're real. What who are you? Where are you from? How'd you how'd you
Speaker 1: do that? Yeah. How'd the whole thing start? I mean, I'm 29 now. At 25, would I say that, you know, looking five years from then, I'll be running a Pelosi stock tracker, building an app with the slogan invest like a politician, having that thing become a thing?
No. I don't think I would have ever gotten to that. So at 25, I was actually living in Bali. I quit my New York City job when I was doing finance, and I started working on my family company where we would sell sports compression products. Yes.
Like little ones with numbers on them. Custom ones that you would get for your kid for, you know, peewee football. Yeah. And I was so sick of the finance grind in New York that I was like, I'm gonna work on this family thing. I'm gonna try and take it up to another level.
I'll go travel around, move to Bali. Was doing working out there for probably, like, six or seven months. Moved back to Boston is where I'm from. Then went up to New Hampshire, became a snowboard instructor, was working on the the ski slopes. Yeah.
There's a whole story behind it. I was working on the ski slopes as a snowboard instructor. Where in New Hampshire? Bretton Woods.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Great, great mountain. Very family friendly. And this is my fun. We're all up there. And then when COVID hit, moved back in with my family, and then that's how I connected with my cofounders, Brian, Aaron, and Scott.
They're out in LA, and there's a whole story on how I essentially connected with them, which we can get into. But we started building an app together. And long story short, I'm sure we'll get into the majority of this stuff. We essentially built out on a tech side the first way to follow your friend's stock portfolios. So if you had a Robin Hood and I had a Webull or a Fidelity, we would connect it to our app, and you can get push notifications of when, you know, a trade would happen.
I was the co founder of it and I was in charge of the growth. And one obvious way to do it, this was during the GameStop era was Yeah. Let me build the Nancy Pelosi portfolio. You know, I'm seeing on Twitter. I'm seeing on TikTok.
I'm seeing on Instagram politicians crushing it and them getting called out for their trades, especially during COVID. You know? Well I never will forget it. Yeah. You covered it.
The the Richard Burr.
Speaker 0: Yeah. It was and I
Speaker 2: knew Richard Burr. I was never against senator Richard Burr of
Speaker 0: North Carolina. And I saw that, and it was it looked like corruption to me. I was disgusted by
Speaker 1: They got investigated by the DOJ, investigated by the SEC. Nothing happened. And that story is insane.
@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal
2/ Nancy Pelosi’s Portfolio Magic Pelosi and her husband turned a $175K salary into a $260 million fortune. It started with the Visa IPO, where they got access to exclusive shares before a massive stock surge. In 2020, she bought $5 million in @Tesla call options right before Biden pushed EV subsidies.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Unusual Whales on X started calling out politicians, including Richard Burr, who is a major player as the head of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. On February 7th, 2020, Burr co-wrote an op-ed downplaying COVID-19 while simultaneously receiving private briefings about its true severity as chair of the senate intelligence committee. Tasked with preparing a response, Burr knew the severity of COVID-19 more than the average American. Then, on February 13th, Burr sold $1,650,000 from his retirement account. Selling off a retirement account to that degree is an extreme move, especially for someone in his position.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Unusual Whales, he's an account on X. He was the one that initially started all this. So the Pelosi tracker
Speaker 1: team You know him?
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. We work with him. He's we great guy.
Speaker 1: I love his I don't know his name or anything about him, but I love that feed.
Speaker 0: Obscure guy doesn't want the world to know about him, but he actually takes deserves so much credit for this stuff.
Speaker 1: I don't think anyone would be Unusual whales.
Speaker 0: Unusual whales on Twitter. Yep. He is the one that would essentially call them out at the beginning. He started the Pelosi tracker in a way. He was calling out the politician stuff, and then the Pelosi tracker came probably in 2022.
But he started in 2020. And I think Richard Burr, that whole story started because unusual well started calling it out. The story behind the Richard Burr is around his COVID traits, and it it was a full on scandal. You covered it at Fox News. The story is on 02/07/2020, he wrote an op ed with another senator saying, hey, Americans, don't worry.
COVID's not that bad. We're keeping an eye on it. Everything will be okay. While he has in writes that op ed, he's getting insider kind of details because he sat as the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee while he was writing that op ed. So while sitting as the chair of the senate intelligence committee, he's getting private meetings saying, hey, guys.
COVID is actually way worse than we think. This is not gonna end the same way that people expect. Be ready for some sort of rapid response.
Speaker 1: And the head of SSCI, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, is is a major player. Yeah. And that's he's not just an average senator. Like, that's a very important position in Washington, in this country, in the world. And so he would have access to a lot of information that fellow senators wouldn't have access to.
Speaker 0: Exactly. And he was tasked with partly, get ready for a response. You know? Like once COVID hits, we think this is gonna be bad. Get ready for a response.
Have the, like, your materials ready to tackle this situation. So he probably knew the severity of it to a ten ten x what the everyday American and also probably what other senators and representatives did as well. So if you follow the timeline though, February 7 is when he wrote that op ed. February 13 is the day that he went and he sold off $1,650,000 of his entire retirement account. A week after he told
Speaker 1: the American retired.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Not only just a normal kinda investment account, his retirement account. You sold the whole thing.
Speaker 1: Is it fair to say for non investor, just to inform the rest of us who are not familiar with the details, to sell off your retirement accounts so that you're not dicking around at that point?
Speaker 0: No. No. No. No. Yeah.
The retirement account is something you don't touch. Like, those are the simply buy and hold, you know, never touch them forever. But selling off that to that degree is extreme. And I think is what caught a lot of people's attention of like, you don't just do that. You know what?
Yeah. You don't just do that while you're the chair of the senate intelligence committee. You know?
@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal
3/ The NVIDIA Play In 2022, Pelosi bought NVIDIA stock right before the CHIPS Act, a $54 billion tech bill she helped pass. When social media caught on, she quickly sold at a loss—the only time she ever publicly disclosed her profits or losses. By late 2023, she bought another $5 million in NVIDIA options.
Video Transcript AI Summary
NVIDIA's a semiconductor company, and in 2022, when the Chips Act was passed, Nancy Pelosi bought NVIDIA stock. People noticed, especially on social media, and questioned the timing. She sold it for a $300,000 loss, unusual because she only discloses profit/loss when it's a loss. Her filings often drop before holidays, potentially to bury the news.
In late 2023, she re-bought $5 million in NVIDIA leaps. This turned out to be an incredibly well-timed trade. NVIDIA surged, and she's now up around 40% on that trade, potentially millions of dollars. These filings give ranges, so exact amounts are unknown, but it's her best recent trade that people have followed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: NVIDIA is a semiconductor. They're essentially the the most popular stock and the best company. I think they're worth more than Apple now. They're the the most valuable company in in the world. They sell the chips for semis.
And, like, they have a whole broader thing beyond just that. But, essentially, they're a semiconductor company. They're they they buy and sell chips. So in 2022, that's when the chips act. If you remember this $54,000,000,000 chips bill that Biden and Pelosi pushed, she bought and this is where social media, again, why it's powerful and the pressure started building up to her at this point because people were following the trades.
The markets were crushing it. She was crushing it in 2021. When 2022 came around, the Chips Act comes out, $54,000,000,000 of infrastructure for chips and subsidies for them. She bought NVIDIA, I think, a couple months before that. Oh, come on.
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It's the this the problem with her is every trade is suspicious. There's never a trade that you just are like, okay.
You know, I could not. And I'll get into them without there's a couple more I can get to. But with that Nvidia trade in particular, she bought it. The chips act comes out. We start making TikToks.
We start tweeting about it. And then everyone's like, what the fuck? What's going on with that? She then sells it for a loss because the the stock was already coming down. This is when the market started falling.
Yeah. And she ended up selling it for a $300,000 loss. She sold it all. Because I think the public was starting to be like, what the fuck? Like, what the how are you doing this when we're already calling you out and you're still continuing to do it?
She sold those things for a 300 k loss and and then she sold her shares for a 200 k loss. So she lost money on that first Nvidia time. But the interesting thing about that is per these filings and the way that the filings work is the stock act requires politicians to disclose them, their spouses, and their dependents of any trade up to forty five days. On that trade in particular is the only time she's ever publicly said her profit and loss. So never before, never since then, only in that filing was when she said, hey, everyone.
I lost 250 k in Nvidia, get off my back kind of thing. She's never done that for when she's profited. She's only done it when she's lost. Interesting. Yeah.
There's so many things with her. She the filings she sends out are always before holidays. So the she's notorious in our community for releasing reports around Thanksgiving, July fourth, Christmas. And I think the argument is because, like, if you put it on December 23, everyone's going off vacation. One's Of course.
Yeah. Tracking. It gets lost. Yeah. Gets lost in the media.
Yeah. Drop bad news on Fridays. That's the Exactly. Yeah. This year, she dropped it on July 4.
That was when she dropped all of these previous Happy birthday, America. I know. Yeah. But so that Nvidia trade goes on. She loses money.
The whole market was doing that in in that year. So she didn't do too well in that that I think it was 2022. Twenty '20 '3 comes around. The market starts going up again, and we have all this information, which I could probably get to. But she then rebuys into NVIDIA at the end of twenty twenty two or at the end of twenty twenty three, excuse me, in November.
She goes and buys $5,000,000 worth of leaps again. Those leaps then right after she buys, there's no no no laws or anything that comes up after that. It just turns out to be a tremendously well timed trade because from there, Nvidia goes up a hundred 60, a 70%. And on that trade in particular, she then bought a little bit more. That 5,000,000 and the the ranges are hard because the way that these filings work is they have to file from one k to 15 k is one little check.
15 k to 50 k, 50 k to a hundred k, a hundred k to 250 k, 2 hundred 50 k to 500 k, 5 hundred k, it's up. So we're going off of the ranges. So you don't know the exact amount that she's she's But that Nvidia trade is the best trade she's ever made that we followed in recent memory. And she's up around like a 40% on that trade in particular. Damn.
And like, this is millions. It's not like it's, you know, 50 k. It's up to $5,000,000. That $5,000,000 could be worth 7,500,000.0 now.
@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal
4/ The Power of Delayed Filings Congress must disclose stock trades, but there’s a 45-day delay built into the system. Pelosi has a pattern of releasing filings right before holidays, when no one is paying attention. July 4th, Christmas, Thanksgiving—it’s all designed to avoid scrutiny.
Video Transcript AI Summary
My net worth is around $260 million, which is a significant increase from my $175k salary as a career politician, supplemented by my husband's successful tech stock investments.
It began in 2020 when I bought Tesla stock, but it goes back further, to the Visa IPO. We were able to buy in on the IPO through privileged access. This was addressed in a Sixty Minutes interview where I was asked if I thought it should be allowed.
In 2020, during COVID, I started trading stocks again. I bought up to $5 million of Tesla calls. These "leaps" are options contracts allowing a bullish position at a cheaper cost. After Biden's election, I bought leaps in Tesla, and when his infrastructure bill included subsidies and charging port investments for EVs, Tesla stock jumped 50%.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Their net worth now is around 260,000,000. So you're 10 x ing that. How? She's been a career long politician, making a hundred 75 k. Her husband's very very successful in, you know, in stocks, particularly tech stocks.
It all started with her in 2020 when she bought Tesla. And this is when I personally started paying attention. And then there's you look back and it's like, holy shit. This has been going on forever. And that actually started back in with the Visa IPO.
So with the Visa IPO, she and her husband were able to get privileged ways to buy in on the IPO, and no one knows how, no one knows why. And then the stock absolutely crushed it. So that was brought up on a sixty minutes interview. And that was that iconic interview from the the reporter asking her, like, do you think this should be allowed? Is this fine that you had gotten in on the visa?
And then, you know, this is ten, twelve years ago. Nothing had necessarily happened. Again, 2020 comes around COVID. So people already necessarily know about her. She now starts trading stocks again and is getting blown up on social media because while everyone's with COVID, what are they doing?
They're on social media, and they're trading stocks. So now everyone's, like, acutely watching these things and paying attention. She in end of twenty twenty twenty twenty, right after Biden got elected, she went and bought up to $5,000,000 of Tesla calls. And I can go on forever about the details of these things. She's not just buying stock.
Well, her husband's not just buying. She's buying these things called leaps. And what a leap is is a options contract that allows you to buy a stock and be bullish on a stock at a much cheaper cost basis. So instead of you needing $5,000,000 to buy, you know, x amount of quote unquote risk in a stock for it to go up, you can actually take that $5,000,000 and buy a leap, and it gives you a broader delta so that you can make more money. Yeah.
Essentially, higher risk, high reward. So she goes and she's buying these leaps. She's not just buying the stocks in them. She buys leaps in Tesla at the end of twenty twenty right after Biden got elected. Twenty twenty one comes around or excuse me, 2019 into 2020 because that was when Biden started.
There's so many dates. But when Biden's first few weeks in office, he introduces the Build Back Better one point three, two point three three, whatever massive infrastructure bill. Yeah. Do you remember that one? Very well.
Part of that bill had tons of not only subsidies for the electric vehicle industry, but also money to build out and invest for the charging ports Yes. For electric vehicles. Because, you know, you can't just tell people to go buy electric cars. In order to the infrastructure. Yeah.
So when you start following the timeline on it, it's like, okay. Biden gets elected. She buys up to $5,000,000 of leaps, which are very risky in Tesla. That agenda then comes out. The stock flies 50%.
So it's not like she's actually, you know, buying things that the the public wouldn't necessarily know about, but she's buying things in a high risky way with a ton of money in ways that the public now is paying attention to because, you know, everyone's trading stocks and they're watching Tesla, Elon. That was when the things started blowing up. And that was the first trade that probably, like, I think retriggered everyone's mind until, like, wait a second. You know, this may not be the sketchiest trade in the world because those things were still public, but how are they allowed to necessarily do that? How is Pelosi the third most powerful person in America?
You know, president, VP, the house, the the head Speaker. Speaker. Yep. They shouldn't be allowed to trade stocks. How is this even like, how are we allowing that?
And I think, like, the culmination of those different intersections is why this started getting big and why people started paying attention specifically to Pelosi.
@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal
5/ Outperforming the Best Investors In 2024, Pelosi’s portfolio was up 54%—double the S&P 500. She outperformed 95% of professional hedge fund managers. She wasn’t even the best trader in Congress—others did even better. https://t.co/hcTcmliJO8
Video Transcript AI Summary
On February 13th, Senator Richard Burr sold off $1,650,000 in stocks and then called his brother-in-law, who, after a brief conversation, sold $265,000 of his own portfolio. This timing raised suspicions, but I know the brother-in-law and find it hard to believe he would do that, but I also understand how everyone in Washington knows everyone.
Around that time, headlines might have prompted anyone to sell. The real issue is the initial call from Burr. Afterward, Burr allegedly had private conversations with donors who then also sold off their assets before the market crashed in early March, saving themselves millions.
Unusual Whales exposed this, leading to SEC and DOJ investigations, but despite finding information, no charges were filed. Burr retired, fitting the familiar pattern of politicians benefiting from their positions without facing consequences.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The story though then goes, February 13, he sells off 1,650,000.00. 30 minutes later, he calls his brother-in-law. And his him and his brother-in-law have around a two minute conversation. The brother-in-law hangs up the phone, calls his financial adviser. His financial adviser doesn't pick up.
He then calls his second financial adviser. They pick up. They have around a thirty second conversation. He then goes off and sells off $265,000 of his own portfolio. So now you got the senator who's the head of the senate intelligence committee calling up his brother-in-law, them having a conversation, and then the brother-in-law going and selling off thirty seconds after that conversation.
Now I don't that's sketchy as hell to me.
Speaker 1: The weird thing is that I know the brother-in-law, who was my neighbor, and a super nice guy, and I sort of knew her, not really, but kind of, you know? And so when you live in and I'm only saying that, it's not unusual that I would know them because I lived in Washington my whole life, but that's kind of one of the reasons we have all this corruption is that everyone knows everybody else. Yeah, yeah, yeah. And it's just impossible to believe that someone whose house you've been at many times, and I have, would do something like that. It's just hard the closer you are to something, the harder it is to just, like, having an alcoholic spouse, like, for the last
Speaker 0: A %. And and, like, the other argument to be had is, like, you know, around February 13, I I don't remember it. You know, I don't remember the headlines that were coming out. Like, how extreme was that? If you're the brother-in-law, of course, you sell out.
Speaker 1: You know?
Speaker 0: Like it's not like you're necessarily gonna listen to that, read all the headlines, and do nothing about it. So it's not even necessarily his fault for selling, and I don't think, like, that's where the insider trading necessarily happens. I think the the culprit is the person who makes that initial phone call, which is I think where the investigation
Speaker 1: Of course. So then what'd they do with the the money?
Speaker 0: They keep so they that happened on February 13. And then the the storyline goes, they started having private Richard Burr started having private conversations with his donors. And then the donors were starting to set all this stuff up. A month later that not even a month, three weeks after that around March, early March is when the market fell 30%. And they saved themselves millions.
That all gets blown up because of, again, unusual whales. The SEC gets involved. The DOJ gets involved. They then find nothing. Well, they they find all this information.
That's how we know about the text. The FBI came in, but they don't charge them with anything. Nothing happens. Richard Burr retires. And, you know, it's just like again, we were chatting about this off camera.
I'm 29. I grew up with this. I'm not surprised by it. I'm just like, yeah. Of course, the politicians kinda can build this situation where they benefit and people will come after them.
They'll make a facade. No charges will happen, and they'll go off into the sunset.
@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal
6/ Legalized Insider Trading Congress isn’t investing. They’re cashing in on inside knowledge while pretending it’s legal. The only reason we know about it? A few people on X refused to stop digging. https://t.co/yp3GikOL23
Video Transcript AI Summary
Our app, Autopilot, lets you invest alongside politicians. Pelosi's up 87% since May 2021, outperforming the S&P by 50%. We have $300 million invested alongside her, with users profiting $30 million. Her office hasn't reached out to us, even after she defended congressional stock trading as part of a free market.
Last year, Pelosi was up 54% versus the market's 26-27%, outperforming it by 25%. She outperformed 95% of hedge fund managers, according to a Bloomberg report. In 2024, Unusual Whales reported she was only the seventh-best trader.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Office ever reached out to you in any way?
Speaker 1: No. The office has never reached out. And, again, like, the crazy thing about this stuff is we took this whole thing a step further by building our app autopilot. In autopilot, the way that it works is you literally can go and invest alongside these politicians. So it's one thing to be like, oh, fuck you, Pelosi.
You know, you're trading in front of us. And then it's like, oh, wait a second. You're crushing it. Like, woah. And now it's like, and now I can invest alongside them because so I can get in on the action.
And I think, like, allowing people to get their money in makes the whole thing kinda just more hypocritical and funnier. So Pelosi, since we've been tracking her, is up 87%. That's from, I think, around May of twenty twenty one, outperforming the spy by 50%. Since in that time period since we've been doing this thing, we now have $300,000,000 literally investing alongside her. People have profited $30,000,000 trading, doing whatever she does in that time frame, give or take.
And her her office has never reached out. She's gone on, you know, been questioned in the press conferences being like, do you think you and members of congress should be allowed to trade stock? And she's like, yeah. Well, it's a free economy. Like, if if it's a free market, we as citizens should be able to trade.
But, of
Speaker 0: course, it's not a free market. And her example shows you what a rigged market it is. Yeah. Of course. I mean, she's so yeah.
She's benefiting from information that she has because of her position. She's not allowed to do that. She does it anyway. It's a crime. She should be prosecuted.
It's certainly a moral crime. So give us some perspective. So she's up this fin you know, fantastic number relative to, like, average investors, informed investors. Like, how well has she done?
Speaker 1: Yep. So last year in particular, and this is probably we and let me be clear. So we're not tracking since it's hard to know the exact amount and Right. It's hard to track her actual trades. So what we track is the filings of it.
And they're roughly the same because they they don't they don't get displayed or filed too too long after. So in 2024, for example, she was up 54%. The market was up around, I think, like, '26 or '27. So she personally outperformed the stock market, you know, the the broader S and P by 20%, twenty five %. We also have these other trackers that track the the hedge funds.
And there was a report from Bloomberg where she actually outperformed, I think, like, 95% of professional hedge fund managers. And when you take a step, it's like, what is good? What the the politicians unusual whales has a report in 2024, and she was only the seventh best trader. There were traders that were better than her.
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been following the controversy surrounding Nancy Pelosi's stock trading, which has recently gained significant attention. Key points from an interview with Tucker Carlson highlight that Pelosi trades between $40-$60 million, far surpassing other Congress members. Her net worth has skyrocketed from $20 million to approximately $260 million, allegedly due to insider trading, particularly linked to VISA's IPO. Prominent figures, including the new FBI Director and Joe Rogan, have labeled her actions as insider trading. A tense exchange with a reporter on 60 Minutes further underscores the scrutiny she faces regarding potential conflicts of interest.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
It about time Nancy Pelosi’s stock trading gets huge attention Some big takeaways from Tucker Carlson and @PelosiTracker_ interview: - Nancy Pelosi actively trades $40-$60 MILLION DOLLARS at any time, this far exceeds all other Congress reps - When Nancy Pelosi and Paul Pelosi got together their combined net worth was roughly $20 million, it’s since SKYROCKETED to roughly $260 million (Nancy Pelosi is worth over a quarter of a billion dollars, it’s unfathomable) - It’s all from insider trading - Her crime spree accelerated when she got special access to VISA’s IPO (no one knows how) People who have called out Nancy Pelosi’s stock trading include: - New Director of The FBI Kash Patel says it’s insider trading - Joe Rogan says it’s insider trading - Grant Cardone says it’s insider trading - Tucker Carlson says it’s insider trading - Even the mainstream media has repeatedly said it’s insider trading Here’s more information on the VISA IPO scandal (this is the video I’m playing as reference) Nancy Pelosi becomes unhinged when a reporter on 60 minutes dares question Pelosi about her and her husband trading on insider information and major legislation they were passing Reporter “I wanted to ask you why you and your husband, back in March of 2008 accepted and participated in a very large IPO deal from Visa. In a time, there was major legislation affecting their credit card companies making its way through the house. Did you consider that to be a conflict of interest?” Nancy Pelosi “I don't know what your point is of your question. Is there some point that you want to make with that?” Reporter “Well, I guess what I'm asking is do you think it's alright for a Speaker to accept a very preferential and favorable stock deal?” Nancy Pelosi “Well, we did” Reporter “At that time you were speaker of the house, you don't think it was a conflict of interest or had the appearance of a conflict of interest?” Nancy Pelosi “It only has appearance if you decide that” This is a must watch, Nancy Pelosi is one of the worst criminals this country has ever seen.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I was asked about my husband and I's participation in a large Visa IPO deal back in February, especially considering major legislation affecting credit card companies was being considered in the House at the time. The question was whether I considered it a conflict of interest, being Speaker of the House.
My response is: What is the point of this line of questioning?
It was asked if I thought it was alright for a speaker to accept such a favorable stock deal.
Well, we did.
And at the time you were Speaker of the House, you don't think it was a conflict of interest or have the appearance of a conflict of interest?
It only has the appearance of a conflict if you are operating on a false premise. It's not true, and that's that. I would not act upon an investment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanted to ask you why you and your husband back in February accepted and participated in a very large IPO deal from Visa. At a time, there was major legislation affecting their credit card companies making its way through the through the house. And did you consider that to be a conflict of interest?
Speaker 1: The I I don't know what your point is of your question. Is there some point that you want to make with that?
Speaker 0: Well, I I I guess what I'm asking is do you think it's alright for a a speaker to accept a very preferential favorable stock deal?
Speaker 1: Well, we did.
Speaker 0: And if you participated in the IPO
Speaker 1: Well, I have made And at
Speaker 0: the time you were speaker of the house, you don't think it was a conflict of interest or have the appearance of a conflict
Speaker 1: of interest. It only has appearance if you decide that you're going to have a a a elaborate on a false premise. But it it it's not true, and that's that.
Speaker 0: I don't understand what part's not true.
Speaker 1: Yes, sir. That that I would act upon an investment. Yes.
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe Nancy Pelosi should be prosecuted for insider trading, as she has significantly outperformed professional hedge fund managers and the market. Since tracking her trades, she's up 87%, with a 54% increase in 2024 while the market rose only 26%. Her trading volume of $40-$60 million far exceeds other Congress members. Her net worth skyrocketed from $20 million to around $260 million, raising concerns about the legality of her trades. Despite being questioned, she insists Congress should continue trading stocks.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
Tucker Carlson calls for Nancy Pelosi to be prosecuted for insider trading, “She's benefiting from information that she has because of her position — It's a crime. She should be prosecuted” - Nancy Pelosi outperformed 95% OF PROFESSIONAL HEDGE FUND MANAGERS - She’s up 87% since having her stock trades tracked professionally - May of 2021, outperforming the spy by 50% - In 2024 Nancy Pelosi was up 54%. The market was up around roughly 26% - Nancy Pelosi actively trades $40-$60 million dollars at any time, this far exceeds all other Congress reps - When Nancy Pelosi and Paul Pelosi got together their combined net worth was roughly $20 million, it’s since SKYROCKETED to roughly $260 million (Nancy Pelosi is worth over a quarter of a billion dollars) - It’s all from insider trading - Nancy Pelosi has been questioned many times and adamantly responds Congress should continue to be allowed to trade stocks Tucker Carlson, “She's benefiting from information that she has because of her position. She's not allowed to do that. She does it anyway. It's a crime. She should be prosecuted relative to like average investors, informed investors”
Video Transcript AI Summary
We've been tracking Pelosi's stock trades since May 2021, and she's up 87%, outperforming the S&P 500 by 50%. Our users have invested $300 million following her, collectively profiting $30 million.
Pelosi has been questioned about congressional stock trading, defending it as part of a free market. However, her success demonstrates the market isn't free. She benefits from insider information due to her position, which is illegal.
In 2024, Pelosi's portfolio grew by 54%, surpassing the market's 27% gain. She outperformed the S&P 500 by 25% and even beat 95% of professional hedge fund managers, according to a Bloomberg report.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You run Nancy Pelosi's stock tracker. It's it's incredible.
Speaker 1: Pelosi, since we've been tracking her, is up 87%. That's from, I think, around May of twenty twenty one, outperforming the spy by 50%. In that time period since we've been doing this thing, we now have $300,000,000 literally investing alongside her. People have profited $30,000,000 trading, doing whatever she does in that time frame. And her her office has never reached out.
She's gone on, you know, been questioned in the the press conferences being like, do you think you and members of congress should be allowed to trade stock? And she's like Should members of congress and their spouses be banned from trading individual stocks while serving in congress?
Speaker 0: No. I don't know to this second one.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, it's a free economy. Like, if if it's a free market, we as citizens should be able to trade.
Speaker 0: But, of course, it's not a free market. And her example shows you what a rigged market it is.
Speaker 1: If yeah. Of course.
Speaker 0: Yeah. She's benefiting from information that she has because of her position. She's not allowed to do that. She does it anyway. It's a crime.
She should be prosecuted. Relative to, like, average investors, informed investors. Like, how well has she done?
Speaker 1: Yep. In 2024, for example, she was up 54%. The market was up around, I think, like '26 or '27. So she personally outperformed the stock market, you know, the the broader S and P by 20%, twenty five %. We also have these other trackers that track the hedge funds.
And there was a report from Bloomberg where she actually outperformed, I think, like, 95% of professional hedge fund managers.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
It’s SO INSANE this is allowed to continue - Nancy Pelosi just bought Shares and Calls of a company called Tempus - Just 17 days later the stock skyrocketed and her investment increased 213% - Nancy Pelosi’s $75k purchase turned into $235k Nancy Pelosi made $160,000 IN 17 DAYS https://t.co/TVJtwCvXbr
Video Transcript AI Summary
I can't believe more people aren't talking about this! Since I reported Nancy Pelosi's purchase of Tempest shares on MLK Day, the stock is up 17% in just seventeen days. But it's even crazier because she bought call options, giving her even more leverage. Her initial $75,000 investment is now worth $235,000 – that's a 213% gain since we revealed it a couple weeks ago.
Trades like this are why I constantly suggest monitoring what members of Congress are trading via sites like QuiverQuant. Until they outlaw congressional trading, we should all be watching. They have access to non-public information, giving them a massive market advantage. Good luck out there!
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't know why nobody is talking about this, but since I reported that Nancy Pelosi bought shares of Tempest on MLK Day, shares of Tempest are up a 17% in just seventeen days. Now what's crazy about this is that she's actually up even more because if you remember the video, she didn't just buy shares of Tempest. She bought call options, which give her even more leverage. What that means is she isn't just up a 17%. Looking at the data, we can see that her original investment of $75,000 is now worth $235,000, a 213% since we disclosed it a couple weeks ago.
Trades like this are exactly why I tell people that until they outlaw trading in congress, they should be checking QuiverQuant every day to see exactly what stocks members of of congress are buying and selling. Because at the end of the day, they have access to information that the public doesn't, which gives them a huge edge in the market. Good luck, and until next time.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m frustrated with the slander against me for being unapologetically America First. I demand AIPAC register as a foreign lobbyist and refuse to support foreign aid funded by U.S. taxpayers. I’ve built my family’s construction business for over two decades and my wealth comes from that, not politics. My financial disclosures reflect my diverse investments managed by a fiduciary. Life was easier before Congress, and I’m proud of my success. I’m committed to ensuring my children can achieve the American dream just as I have.
@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸
I’m fed up with the outright slander and lies about me because I’m UNAPOLOGETICALLY AMERICA FIRST and I am demanding AIPAC register as a foreign lobbyist and I refuse to vote for U.S. taxpayers hard earned money fund foreign aid and foreign wars. I’ve owned my family’s construction business for well over two decades and made all of my net worth BEFORE I became a Member of Congress in 2021 and all of my Public financial disclosures show this. My publicly disclosed portfolio is diversely invested through a financial manager whom I’ve signed a fiduciary contract with. My hard earned wealth, that I am thankful and proud of HAS NOT in any way come from politics!!! As a matter of fact I made a hell of a lot more money and my life was WAY EASIER before I entered public life. I am so proud of my company’s success and hard work and there is not anyone who can shame me for being a successful business owner because thankfully I’ve lived the American dream!!! You can go to hell. I am FIGHTING to ensure that my children’s generation is able to do exactly what I have done!!! I’m fighting to preserve the AMERICAN DREAM!!!
@EYakoby - Eyal Yakoby
How does Marjorie Taylor Greene’s net worth go from $700,000 before she joined Congress to $21 million today? A congressional salary is only $174,000 per year. https://t.co/I31Ltz3B0T
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe it's time to advocate for a ban on single stock trading due to the questionable credibility of Congress, especially when we see astonishing returns from figures like Nancy Pelosi and Senator Wyden. Their performance would make any hedge fund envious, which raises concerns about the integrity of our representatives. It's crucial that those in Washington prioritize serving the American people over personal financial gain.
@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal
🇺🇸 SEC BESSENT: EVERY HEDGE FUND WOULD BE JEALOUS OF NANCY PELOSI "I am going to start pushing for a single stock trading ban because it is the credibility of the House and the Senate that you look at some of these eye-popping returns. Whether it's Representative Pelosi, Senator Wyden. Every hedge fund would be jealous of them. And the American people deserve better than this. People shouldn't come to Washington to get rich. They should come to serve the American people." Source: @EricLDaugh
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker pledges to push for a single stock trading ban, arguing "it is the credibility of the House and the Senate" that is at stake from "eye popping returns," observed in figures like "Representative Pelosi, Senator Wyden," suggesting "every hedge fund would be jealous of them." They assert "the American people deserve better than this" and that "People don't shouldn't come to Washington to get rich." Instead, they should "come to serve the American people," as such trading undermines trust in the system, because "if any private citizen traded this way, the SEC would be knocking on their door."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I am going to start pushing for a single stock trading ban because the it is the credibility of the House and the Senate that you look at some of these eye popping returns, whether it's Representative Pelosi, Senator Wyden, every hedge fund would be jealous of them. And the American people deserve better than this. People don't shouldn't come to Washington to get rich. They should come to serve the American people, and it brings down trust in the system because I can tell you that if any private citizen traded this way, the SEC would be knocking on their door.
@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal
🇺🇸 TRUMP BACKS STOCK TRADING BAN: NO MORE PELOSI PROFITS The White House says Trump supports banning lawmakers from trading stocks after blasting Nancy Pelosi for allegedly “ripping off constituents.” Press secretary Karoline Leavitt slammed Pelosi’s $413M net worth, pointing out her stock portfolio “grew 70% in 1 year in 2024” despite a $174K salary. The proposed PELOSI Act would ban members of Congress and their spouses from trading stocks while in office. Source: Fox News
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m concerned about politicians profiting from insider trading. For instance, Nancy Pelosi earns $174k annually but has a net worth of $413M. In 2024, her stock portfolio grew by 70%, surpassing all hedge funds. This raises questions about how she and others might be using their knowledge of upcoming legislation and government contracts to benefit financially before the information is public. It's crucial to address this issue to ensure fairness and integrity in our political system.
@BelannF - BelannF
WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE ABOUT POLITICIANS PROFITING OFF OF INSIDER TRADING? EXAMPLE: Pelosi makes $174k per year - yet she has a net worth of $413M” "In 2024 Nancy Pelosi's stock portfolio grew by 70%, outperforming every single Hedge Fund." This is all done by Insider Trading, knowing what laws Congress is going to pass and which Corporations that will benefit (or sometimes harm), or major contracts the government is going to sign (or cancel), before the news reaches the markets or the general public.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The reason that this idea to put a ban on stock trading for members of congress is even a thing is because of Nancy Pelosi. She is is is rightfully criticized because she makes, think, a $174,000 a year, yet she has a net worth of approximately 413,000,000. In 2024, Nancy Pelosi's stock portfolio, this was a fascinating statistic to me, grew 70% in one year in 2024. And her portfolio outperformed every single large hedge fund in that same year and even more than doubled the returns of Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway. As for the mechanics of the legislation and how it will move forward, the White House continues to be in discussions with our friends on Capitol Hill.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The reason that this idea to put a ban on stock trading for members of congress is even a thing is because of Nancy Pelosi. I mean, she is is is rightfully criticized because she makes, think, a $174,000 a year, yet she has a net worth of approximately 413,000,000. In 2024, Nancy Pelosi's stock portfolio, this was a fascinating statistic to me, grew 70% in one year in 2024. And her portfolio outperformed every single large hedge fund in that same year and even more than doubled the returns of Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway. So think the president stands with the American people on this.
He doesn't wanna see people like Nancy Pelosi enriching themselves off of public service and ripping off their constituents in the process. As for the mechanics of the legislation and how it will move forward, the White House continues to be in discussions with our friends on Capitol Hill.
@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere
Huh ,what repeat that again!? Pelosi OUTPERFORMS SOME TOP BILLIONAIRES!!! WHAT!? https://t.co/AAlVjzc4Sh