TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @someonesom47381

GenFlynn
Posted - March 18, 2026 at 4:11 AM
Saved - March 18, 2026 at 8:17 PM

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

Pretty much what John Birch said…and very few listened. Yet here we are.

@SternDrewCrypto - Stern Drew

🚨 THE 1958 BLUEPRINT TO DESTROY AMERICA IS UNFOLDING EXACTLY AS PLANNED – ROBERT WELCH WARNED US 68 YEARS AGO! 🇺🇸 In 1958, John Birch Society founder Robert Welch exposed the INSIDERS' (globalist cabal / deep state communists) chilling 10-step master plan to collapse the Republic from within. He called it out in his legendary speech and EVERY SINGLE STEP is happening RIGHT NOW in 2026. The 10 Steps to Total Enslavement: 1. Explode government spending → waste trillions on endless "crises" & pork to bankrupt the nation 2. Skyrocket taxes → squeeze the middle class dry while elites hoard 3. Run massive deficits forever → debt slavery is the goal 4. Engineered wild inflation → devalue your savings & wages into dust 5. Price/wage controls "to fight inflation" → introduce total economic tyranny 6. Ramp up socialist controls → micromanage every aspect of your life & economy 7. Centralize ALL power in DC → erase state sovereignty, dissolve borders & state lines for one-world federal rule 8. Seize & indoctrinate the education system → brainwash generations into hating America & loving collectivism 9. Hammer endless anti-war propaganda → push "peace" ONLY on communist/globalist terms while weakening defenses 10. Breed total apathy → numb the masses with distractions, drugs, division & despair so they never resist They laughed at Welch then. They call it "conspiracy theory" now. But open your eyes: Look around. This isn't coincidence. This is EXECUTION. The plan isn't coming – it's HERE. The Republic is being deliberately dismantled by traitors inside the gates. WAKE UP BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE. Share this before they censor it. The fight is NOW. 🇺🇸

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript presents a two-part keynote by Robert Welch (referred to as Bob Welch) delivered at a John Birch Society gathering, framed as a condensed version of an original two-day presentation from December 1958 in Indianapolis, and followed by a thirty-minute update fifteen years later in Los Angeles (1974). The event is hosted by William J. Grady, with Grady introducing the setting and the participants. The core of Welch’s message is a vehement diagnosis of a global communist conspiracy and a program for action to counter it, rooted in a religiously tinged faith in American exceptionalism and in a call for “dynamic personal leadership” to galvanize a broad movement outside traditional political parties. Part I: The Indianapolis framing and the original four-part thesis - The evening is designed to recreate the atmosphere of a two-day private meeting held at the home of Margaret Dice in Indianapolis, where 11 of 17 invited men gathered to hear a comprehensive analysis of current events and a forecast of a coming crisis. Welch’s presentation is presented as a verbatim condensation of the original Blue Book text, with omissions and occasional aside notes indicating background context that listeners are assumed to accept. - The central premise is stark: the communists are “in virtual control of everything” in America’s national life, and their three-part strategic plan has moved forward steadily without deviation. The plan, as outlined, is: 1) Take Eastern Europe, 2) Move into Asia to complete the second step, 3) Then take over the United States, with Asia as a stepping-stone to Western Europe and the rest of the world. - Welch emphasizes the methods used by the communists: weaning populations with socialist ideology, bribery, lies, brutality, treason, and “the countless tentacles of treason,” but most critically, patient gradualism. The approach does not rely on direct Russian military intervention but on subversion, manipulation of civil institutions, and the gradual surrender of sovereignty through participation in international bodies (e.g., the United Nations) and the spread of socialist policies. - A central claim concerns the United States’ vulnerability due to an inherited Western European pattern of collectivism. Welch draws on Oswald Spengler’s framework to argue that Western Europe’s decline—accelerated by the “cancer” of collectivism—has infected American political culture, which he characterizes as a young, vigorous republic now beset by welfare-state tendencies, increased government, and a weakening of traditional faith and moral certainty. - Religious and moral elements run strongly through the argument. Welch laments a “spiritual vacuum” in Western Europe and America, the erosion of faith, and the rise of amorality, which he sees as breeding ground for communist subversion. He praises fundamentalist Christian faith as a bulwark, while warning that the remaining faithful need to translate belief into civic responsibility. - The core diagnostic includes a fear that American sovereignty is being chipped away by gradual integration with international structures and by the construction of a socialist economy. He catalogs ten aims allegedly embedded in “foundations” and international pressure—such as increased government spending and taxation, inflation, price controls, centralization of power in Washington, federalization of public education, anti-militarism framed as peace, and appeasement of the Soviet bloc—arguing that these would gradually undermine American liberty and national security. - Welch argues the only effective counter to this threat is dynamic personal leadership rather than conventional party politics. He critiques the capacity of political leaders to spearhead a comprehensive anti-communist movement, contending that personal leadership is essential to bind a broad coalition against a disciplined enemy. He explicitly critiques Barry Goldwater and Richard Nixon as insufficient standpoints for leading such a broader struggle, claiming they are bound by political constraints and fear of (or compromise with) the same insiders who influence national policy. - The role of the John Birch Society emerges as a vehicle for a united, top-down, non-religiously sectarian but deeply principled and evangelical-influenced anti-communist movement. Welch argues for a monolithic organization that is not a traditional political party but a voluntary association focused on education, persuasion, and action to reverse collectivist trends. He stresses that the Society must be tightly organized to resist infiltration and internal dissent, contrasting it with “debating societies” that cannot stop a conspiracy. Part II: Fifteen years ahead (the update in Los Angeles, 1974) - Welch recaps the first fifteen years, noting that the John Birch Society has grown to over 2,000 Berkshires (participants) and friends, and that a cash infusion from Ben Stoddart’s $1,000 check catalyzed continued operations. The organization has insisted on staying true to its original charter, offering education as its total strategy and truth as its chief weapon, and facing smear campaigns and political opposition from figures like Nixon and Buckley while expanding its educational tools—books, pamphlets, magazines, films, records, and a large speakers bureau. - He stresses the Society’s self-conception as unique: the only cohesive voluntary non-religious organization for adult education on a nationwide basis, with a broad educational mission and a counter-conspiracy framework that rejects conventional party politics in favor of a broader “Americanist” project. He notes the organization’s achievements in stopping or slowing various leftist campaigns (e.g., movements among minorities that he labels as Communist-controlled), and credits the expansion of its reach through local chapters, staff coordinators, and a robust informational ecosystem. - The narrative emphasizes the Society’s anti-narratives about public figures (e.g., Martin Luther King) and its stories of alleged conspiratorial influence within the government and media, arguing that the organization’s efforts have shifted public perception from 4% favorable to around 50% by the mid-1970s. Welch frames the organization as a counterweight to what he terms a “conspiracy” and a defensive bulwark against subversion. - The “Some Points to Remember” section is summarized: the Society has persisted on its original course; it is unique in its nationwide educational model; it has pioneered organizational methods in a way that challenges collectivist power; it has faced aggressive smearing and resistance but maintained its focus on education and truth; and its work spans the U.S. and a few foreign commencements with a global footprint through its messages. - Welch underscores seven or more operational strategies that the Society has employed or might employ going forward: expanding reading rooms and distribution of conservative literature; broadening radio and local broadcast reach; leveraging letter-writing campaigns; organizing fronts and networks; conducting exposés to awaken more Americans to alleged infiltrations; maintaining a cadre of speakers; extending international outreach; and using political pressure to influence policy. He emphasizes that the organization will not rely on political campaigning alone; rather, it will act as a catalyst and backbone for a broader patriotic uprising. Part III: Core program and five-year to fifteen-year vision (the late-1960s to mid-1970s section) - Welch asserts a five-word governing principle: less government and more responsibility, arguing that government tends to be a nonproductive expense, often evil, and always an enemy of individual freedom. He expands on ten generalizations about government—its necessity, its inefficiency, its tendency to erode the middle class, and its expansion as a driving force behind collectivism—while contrasting the “true Americanist” belief in individual freedom and voluntary social order with the collectivist aims of a centralized state. - The final sections outline specific, concrete objectives and a forward-looking program for the John Birch Society: the restoration of full American independence by leaving the United Nations; returning to gold-backed currency; reducing government by at least 50% through gradual reforms; withdrawing U.S. troops from non-sovereign soil except where Congress deems necessary; limiting government to proper functions and decentralizing power; maintaining a robust educational and cultural ecosystem to sustain support for these reforms. - Welch closes with a aspirational vision of the next fifteen years: a new era of less government, greater personal responsibility, and a better world, contingent on large-scale, concerted, and sustained grassroots action guided by a leadership committed to the Society’s mission. Overall, the transcript captures Welch’s emphatic, zealous case for a comprehensive, quasi-religious anti-communist program anchored in American exceptionalism, a call for dynamic leadership beyond traditional party politics, and a blueprint for organizational growth and political action through the John Birch Society. It blends apocalyptic rhetoric about a global conspiracy with a pragmatic if aggressive program for education, organization, and political influence aimed at fundamentally reshaping American governance and international engagement.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And now ladies and gentlemen, we come to the real substance of this evening's program. Mr. Welsh is going to deliver a speech in two parts. The first part of that speech is a condensation of the Blue Book entitled fifteen years ago, exactly as it was delivered at the fifteenth birthday dinner of the John Birch Society in New York on 12/07/1973. Then the second and shorter part of Mr. Welsh's total speech is entitled And Fifteen Years Ahead. It will round out the total presentation, which he has epitomized under the heading, In One Generation. To give you the proper setting for this dramatic offering, we are going to call on Mr. William J. Grady, who, for a great many years, was president and then chairman of the board of Grady Foundries, a highly successful business with eight plants today, which he established over fifty years ago. At one time, he was also both president and then chairman of the JI Case Company, which is one of our country's very sizable corporate industries. Mr. Grady is a former president and then chairman of the board of the National Association of Manufacturers and a former president of the National Council of YMCAs of the United States. But today, being as near to total retirement from business responsibilities as a man of his dynamic character can become, Mr. Grady is, and for many years has been, Chairman of the Executive Committee of the John Birch Society. What's more, Mr. Grady was himself present at the founding meeting of the Society in Indianapolis on December 1958. We are also pleased to have some others from that founding meeting at our head tables here tonight. We have asked Mr. Grady to set the stage for the first part of Mr. Welsh's speech. So it is my great pleasure to present to you a truly wonderful American, Mr. William J. Grady. Speaker 1: Ladies and gentlemen, having known and admired my friend Bob for more than ten years before the founding of the John Birch Society, this is an opportunity, and I might say a temptation, to use more time than is allotted to me to introduce this really good friend and great patriot. But my function here tonight is to ask you to join us as stage properties, if you wish, to a performance of fifteen years ago. We want you to go back in your minds to the outlook at that time, and in that mood to constitute yourselves as the 11 men of whom I was one who sat and listened for two full days to an exposition of what was happening to our country and what what and what was going to happen unless we woke up and did enough about it. This meeting was at the home of miss Margaret Dice in Indianapolis. A picture of her home is on your program. As you look at this picture, the front right hand corner is the living room where our two day session occurred. Of the 17 men that were originally invited, 11 had accepted and every one of those 11 showed up despite the fact that the weather was about the nastiest and sweetest that December can produce. And both major airlines which served Indianapolis were on strike. Not one of us had ever met or even seen Ms. Dice before nor had Mr. Welch, although he and she had become very good friends by mail because of her outstanding patriotic efforts. And on learning about the proposed meeting, she had volunteered her home and hospitality for the group. Incidentally, Ms. Dice, with her very friendly servants taking care of the coffee breaks and luncheons and other needs of hospitality, and with her own chair drawn up out of sight of the group in the corridor just around the corner from the door of her living room had listened to most of the whole two day discussion without any of us being aware of it. And she was not favorably impressed. As she told mister Welch on taking him to his plane Wednesday morning, she did not think that anybody would ever stand still for the thoroughness with which we intended to examine every problem. Within two or three years, however, she had completely changed her mind and had become an ardent life member of the society for the rest of her day. Mr. Welsh had arrived on Sunday. So by Monday morning, he and Ms. Dice had borrowed from the local church a full sized podium and had set it up in one corner of her living room. They'd also arranged all of the chairs and sofas for exactly where each of us was to sit. At 09:45 that Monday morning, therefore, when everybody had arrived despite the weather and had been duly seated, the meeting got underway. Or as your editor puts it, a trembling boy, 58 years old, having screwed up his courage to the requirements of this ordeal, went to the podium and installed himself immovably from behind it for two days. This is the nearest, Bob says, that he ever came to being a preacher of the Gospel, although he had taught Bible classes in college for over forty years before. In any event, he was still wondering what would be the reaction of these extremely busy men to what they were going to hear after having committed themselves to two full days plus travel time to come and hear it. But with all practical escape now cut off, Bob Welch finally plunged into that marathon monologue on which he'd been working during most of October and November, and which eventually was to become the Blue Book of the John Birch Society. You are going to hear that monologue tonight compressed into about one tenth of its former volume. But this condensation has been accomplished by a very careful selection and pulling together of phrases and sentences from the original text so as to carry the main thread of thought from the beginning to the end. Now naturally, a great deal of the documentation, background, and explanation with regard to many of the points will have to be omitted. The fact that there have been such omissions will be indicated by Bob by an occasional aside during the first two or three minutes of his speech. But after that, he will assume that you are taking them for granted. But no transitional or connecting phrases or sentences will will have been added at any point. This is from the original take. So we ask you to keep constantly in mind that all of the statements you hear were made fifteen years ago and that every one of them is verbatim from the original presentation. So now we again ask you to remember or imagine that you are an audience of 11 men sitting in a living room in Indianapolis on December 1958 and listening to mister Robert Wells. Speaker 2: Gentlemen, let me welcome you to Indianapolis. All of you, I believe, are already aware of my appreciation for your being here. At this point, there's an omission of five lines. But each of you also felt that you would not have been asked to give up everything else and come to this meeting and then to listen to my voice off and on for so much of the two days unless I had some very serious matters to put before you and proposals to discuss. Frankly, the matters are serious and the proposals are far reaching, so much so that just their presentation makes me feel solemnly humble at the size of the task envisioned. For increasingly, before tomorrow is over, I hope to have all of you feeling that you are taking part here and now in the beginning of a movement of historical importance. But long journeys start with easy steps, and our first step should be to identify our fellow travelers. No pun intended. Many of you are known to each other, but some are not. So let me, as informally as possible, introduce each one to the group. This was then done, and here we also omit one page. Our immediate and most urgent anxiety, of course, is the threat of the communist conspiracy, and, well, it should be. For both internationally and within The United States, the communists are much further advanced and more deeply entrenched than is realized by even most of the serious students of the danger among the anticommunists. I personally have been studying the problem increasingly for about nine years and practically full time for the past three years. And entirely without pride, but in simple thankfulness, let me point out that a lifetime of business experience should have made it easier for me to see the falsity of the economic theories on which communism is supposedly based, to see them more readily than might some scholar coming into that study from the academic cloisters. While a lifetime of interest in things academic, especially world history, should have given me an advantage over many businessmen in more readily seeing the sophistries in dialectic materialism. So I have felt rightly or wrongly that my grasp of communist purposes and even of their methods should have been more rapid than that of some of my patriotic friends who have gradually become staunch anticommunists. Yet almost every day, I run into some whole new area where the communists have been penetrating and working quietly for years. Until now, they are in virtual control of everything that is done in that slice or corner of our national life. Again, on a mission of one page. But as background for our further discussion, I'm going to ask for your patience while I make a much more general review with you of how far the international conspiracy as a whole has now gone and where we stand today. Now omit 12 lines, and from here on, I must simply quote extracts, sometimes many pages apart, without giving you the background to which they belong or calling your attention to the size of our jumps ahead. But we do ask you again in order to avoid confusion, please to remember that all of those lines were written and then spoken in the 1958. Section one, look at the score. Throughout all history, the bearer of bad news has been a most unpopular person. So I certainly am not seeking any garlands of popularity at present. For the truth I bring you is simple, incontrovertible, and deadly. It is that we are living in America today in such a fool's paradise as the people of China lived in twenty years ago, as the people of Czechoslovakia lived in a dozen years ago, and as the people of Iraq lived in only yesterday. And as George Santayana so brilliantly pointed out, those who will learn nothing from history are condemned to repeat it. Lenin died in 1924. But before he died, he had laid down for his followers the strategy for this conquest. It has been paraphrased and summarized as follows. First, we will take Eastern Europe. Next, the masses of Asia. Then we shall encircle the last bastion of capitalism, The United States Of America. We shall not have to attack. It will fall like overwrite fruit into our hands. To make doubly clear what he meant and how firmly he meant it with regard to taking Asia ahead of Western Europe and then using Asia as a stepping stone and base from which to conquer Western Europe and the rest of the world, the strategy was also stated that for the communists, the road to Paris led through Peking and Calcutta. Today, you could easily see how that road to Paris is leading back from Peking through Calcutta, Cairo, Damascus, Baghdad, and Algiers. Now, gentlemen, there are many remarkable things about that three step strategy, but the most remarkable is that the communists have never wavered from it one iota. They have used the philosophy of socialism as an ideological weapon in this struggle whenever they could and for whatever it was worth. But they've also used bribery, lies, bluff, brutality, the countless tentacles of treason, murder on a scale never before dreamed of in the world, and every possible means to advance them on this road without the slightest concern for any moral difference in those various means. And above all, they have used patience. A patient gradualism has been the most important key to the communist's overwhelming success. And in October 1950, Stalin's lackeys formalized their puppet state of East Germany. By this time, of course, there were other takeovers going on in other parts of the world as we shall see. But we are dealing here only with Europe, and East Germany finished the job there as it had been planned by Lenin twenty six years before. The communists now had Eastern Europe and Tyre, and the first step of their three step program was complete. Next was Asia. Actually, the anticommunist position is crumbling rapidly everywhere in Asia. If you will look at a map of Asia with all of these countries properly shaded, I think you will agree with me in my estimate of the Communist progress. It is that they have already gone three fourths of the way towards the completion of the second step in their three part program. Now let's consider the rest of the world. It is with the benefit of this realistic background, therefore, that I venture to offer the following opinion. It is that the communists, through long and careful and insidious preparation, have already gone at least one fourth of the way towards the accomplishment of their third and final step, which is taking over this country. And with it, of course, the rest of the world. Now one plus three fourths plus one fourth adds up to two out of that total of three. And not to believe that the communists are already two thirds of the way towards carrying out their total program, or that they are not now moving at an accelerated pace and with increased momentum to finish the job, is to close your eyes to the plain facts as surely as did the good people of Czechoslovakia in 1948 and with the same ultimately fatal results. Now please note, gentlemen, that the communists have never made any of this immense progress by the direct use of force. They have beguiled Chinese into fighting Chinese, Koreans into fighting Koreans, Vietnamese into fighting the French and each other, the Israelis, British, and French into fighting Egyptians, the Algerians into fighting the French. They have even maneuvered Americans into fighting Chinese communists in Korea with the Americans hands tied behind their backs. But not one Russian regiment has ever taken part in any of this imperialistic advance except for the suppression of of rebellion in already conquered territory as in Hungary. There are three possible methods by which the communists might take us over. One would be by a peaceful coup d'etat as in Czechoslovakia in 1948. The second method would be by fomenting civil war in this country and aiding the communist side with military might. But there is a third method which they are clearly relying on most heavily, and this is taking us over by a process so gradual and insidious that communist rule is slipped over so far on the American people before they ever realize it is happening. The process in that direction is going on right now gradually but surely and with ever increasing spread and speed. A part of that plan, of course, is to induce the gradual surrender of American sovereignty piece by piece and step by step to various international organizations of which the United Nations is the outstanding but far from the only example. But another part is the conversion of The United States into a socialist nation, quite similar to Russia itself in its economy and political outlook before police state enforcement is ever introduced. The best way to explain the aim here is simply to quote the directive under which some of the very largest American foundations have been secretly but visibly working for years. This directive is so to change the economic and political structure of The United States that it can be comfortably merged with Soviet Russia. Now here are the communist aims for The United States. One, greatly expanded government spending for every conceivable means of getting rid of ever larger sums of American money as wastefully as possible Two, higher and then much higher taxes. Three, an increasingly unbalanced budget despite the higher taxes. Four, wild inflation of our currency. Five, government controls of prices, wages, and materials supposedly to combat inflation six, greatly increased socialistic controls over every operation of our economy and every activity of our daily lives. This is to be accompanied, naturally and automatically, by a correspondingly huge increase in the size of our bureaucracy and in both the cost and reach of our domestic government. Seven, far more centralization of power in Washington and the practical elimination of our state lines. There is a many faceted drive at work to have our state lines eventually mean no more within the nation than our county lines do now within the states. Eight, the steady advance of federal aid to and control over our educational system, leading to complete federalization of our public education. Nine, a constant hammering into the American consciousness of the horror of modern warfare. The beauties and the absolute necessity of peace, peace always on communist terms, of course. And 10, the consequent willingness of the American people to allow the steps of appeasement by our government which amount to a piecemeal surrender of the rest of the free world and of The United States itself. In summary, gentlemen, we are losing, rapidly losing, a cold war in which our freedom, our country, and our very existence are at stake. And while we don't seem to know we are losing this war, you can be sure the communists do. There is just one thing, only one thing in the whole world which the communists fear today. It is that despite their tremendous influence in our government and over all of our means of mass communication, the American people will wake up too soon to what has really been happening and what is now happening right under their very noses. The only thing which can possibly stop the communist is for the American people to learn the truth in time. One matter on which most Americans need to become better informed is what being subjugated by the communist or arriving at an accommodation with communism, as they want it called, would really mean. For their cruelty and terrorism is almost beyond imagination, and the domination of our press television and radio by communist influences is now so great that you simply are not allowed to learn or to be reminded of the real nature of the beasts to whom we are losing. General Mark Clark, for instance, officially reported from Korea, quote, we obtained solid evidence that the communists slaughtered 11,622 members of my command while they were defenseless prisoners of war. These men were tied to their fellow prisoners and transported to previously selected sites. They were dumped alive into trenches dug for the purpose and summarily shot. About 5,000 of those boys were from your hometowns and mine. But how many of you ever saw that report in your headlines or anywhere else? During the so called Spanish Civil War, the London Times, which then is now certainly was not slanted in favor of the anticommunists, reported that in one twelve months period, the communists had murdered over 4,000 priests in cold blood and had driven more than that many nuns out into the streets of various Spanish cities, inflicted horrible obscenities on them, and then murdered the nuns. In some places, the communist herded priests and their congregations into churches, set the churches on fire, and burned the Christians and their buildings together. These and similar epic cruelties of the period are facts documented beyond all question. But how many of you have ever heard them? All of this vicious and purposeful savagery I have been trying so inadequately even to indicate is not something happening on some other and far off planet or perpetrated by the Assyrians twenty five hundred years ago or dreamed up as the imaginative nightmare of an Edgar Allen Poe. These gentlemen are the very real acts and deliberate policies of the recent past and the very present, of people whom we treat as human beings and with whom we sit around conference tables and arrive at truce terms and concessions to appease them. There are some 700,000,000 non Russian, non communists now living daily lives of virtual slavery behind the iron curtain, some 40,000,000 of them in the actual slave labor camps of Russia and Red China, who only a dozen years ago or much less enjoyed practically the same personal freedoms as do you and I today. These people now say to each other, but above all to themselves, if I'd only known, if I'd only believed, there is no amount of work and sacrifice and suffering I would not have given if I'd only realized the necessity, the danger in time. Now it is too late, and any amount of struggle and of sacrifice, even of life itself, is all in vain, unquote. The number of people subject to these cruelties is now increasing by tens of millions every year, and we are directly in the path of the conqueror. Are we really so hopelessly blind, so stupefied by prosperity on one side and the insidious propaganda on the other that we cannot even see the wolves devouring the carcasses of our brothers or drawing ever nearer to ourselves? Are we going to let our country and our whole civilization go under and new dark ages of serfdom be ushered in while we happily play at our little games? May God forbid, but may we speedily become more worthy that he should. Section two. But let's look deeper. Now if the danger from the communist conspiracy were all we had to worry about, it would be enough. But in my opinion, the first great basic weakness of The United States, and hence its susceptibility to the disease of collectivism, is simply the age of the Western European civilization. Some of you will already have recognized, in fact, that I am drawing a corollary to the conclusions usually connected with the name of Oswald Spengler. Spengler's theory is absolutely fatal to the acceptance of socialism or any form of collectivism as a forward step or as a form of progress in man's sociological arrangements. For in Spangler's view, collectivism is a disease of society, concomitant with decay, and remarkably similar to cancer in the individual. The Roman Empire of the West, for instance, started dying from the cancer of collectivism from the time Diocletian imposed on it his New Deal. And it is perfectly evident right in the cases of the various civilizations that we know most know most about, that both the Greek and the Roman civilizations did perish of the cancer of collectivism, and that the civilization of Western Europe is doing so today. It was Western Europe which made the last half of the nineteenth century the period of the highest level to which man has yet climbed in his struggle to reach an enlightened and humane life. But, as so often happens for the individual, by the time Western Europe had the knowledge, the wealth, and the ability to get the most out of life, it was ready to die. The truth is that by a cycle which seems inevitable, whether it is a biological reality or only an analogy, Western Europe was worn out. And under those circumstances, the degenerative disease of collectivism, the cancer of social organizations, began its peripheral infiltration. The American different civilization from the old and ancestral one of Western Europe as was Rome, a new civilization distinct from Greece. And this American civilization, at the turn of the present century, was only 300 years old. It had the strength and vigor and promise of a healthy young man in his late teens. There was no reason on earth for any such organism to be attacked by and then start succumbing to the cancerous disease of collectivism at that stage of its young manhood with its whole lifespan of accomplishment before it. But we have the cancerous disease of collectivism firmly implanted now. Nevertheless, we have people feeling that nothing should be done by them but everything for them by the government. Its disastrous ravages are quite far advanced, and we have it basically because of too long and too close an association with a parent disease, that was old enough and weakened enough for the virus to be rapidly active throughout this parent's whole environment. When Woodrow Wilson, cajoled and guided even then by the collectivists of Europe, took us into the First World War while solemnly swearing that he would never do so, he did much more than end America's great period of happy and wholesome independence of Europe. He put his healthy young country in the same house and for a while the same bed, with this parrot who was already yielding to the collectivist cancer. We never got out of that house again. We were once more put back even in the same bed by Franklin D. Roosevelt, also while lying in his teeth about his intentions. And we have never been able to get out of that bed since. Push the communist back. Get out of the bed of a Europe that is dying with this cancer of collectivism, and breathe our own healthy air of opportunity, enterprise, and freedom. Then the cancer we already have, even though it is of considerable growth, can be cut out. And despite the bad scars and the loss of some muscles, this young, strong, great new nation, restored to vigor, courage, ambition, and self confidence, can still go ahead to fulfill its great destiny and to become an even more glorious example for all the earth than it ever was before. It should be centuries from now before the natural time comes for the decline of America and for the highest torch of civilization to be taken over by the rising newer nations to the West. But we do have to achieve the sufficiently drastic surgery, and that, of course, is a Herculean task. We should return to a study of it when we come to the more positive part of this program. Section three and Deeper Still. Now, gentlemen, in looking thoroughly and realistically at the danger to everything we have inherited, spiritual as well as material, and at the cause of that danger, we come to the second of the fundamental reasons for deep and basic anxiety. And putting that matter bluntly at once, the reason is simply loss of faith. Not just loss of faith in God and all his works, but loss of faith in man and his works too, in his reasons for existence, in his purposes, and in his hopes. Let all of us thank whatever God we severally worship that there is so large a remnant of the really true believers still left. We honor them. We need their steadying adherence to the rock of reverence and their aspiration of unwavering obedience to ancient and divine commandments. We desperately need their unshakable confidence in absolutes, in eternal principles and truths, in a world of increasing relativity and transitoriness in all things. We admire them. In fact, as will become more clear tomorrow, the young man I admire most of all of those America has produced was a fundamentalist Baptist missionary named John Birch. But we must not let our admiration for dependence on and feeling of spiritual kinship with the fundamentalists blind us to the visible fact that their number grows smaller every year. Among the people literate enough and ambitious enough to be activists in Europe and America, those who are honest and true believers in a faith which most of them still profess is an ever smaller minority. What is far worse, fully one third of the services that at least the Protestant churches of America are helping that trend. Some ministers have converted Christianity into a so called social gospel, which becomes, in fact, indistinguishable from advocacy of the welfare state by socialist politicians. And some actually used their pulpits to preach outright communism, often in very thin disguise, if any, while having the hypocrisy as atheists to thank God in public for their progressive apostasy. We must not only know the truth but face the truth if it is to set us free or to keep us so. Except for the diminishing number of fundamentalists of all religions, all faith has been replaced or is rapidly being replaced by a pragmatic opportunism with hedonistic aims. And what a fall that is for a race which can boast of once having listened to a Saint Augustine, a Saint Francis of Assisi, a John Milton, or an Alfred Tennyson. In Western Europe and America today, we are living in a spiritual vacuum, exactly as were the Romans after they had lost any real faith in their pagan gods and before the rise of Christianity. The most terrible result of this collapse of the rock of faith on which our morality was built is the rise of the immoral man, of which the usual communist himself is the most illustrative example. For the chief point of this whole present section of our discussion runs parallel to the main point in connection with the extent to which the cancel of collectivism has weakened and endangered us. Besides the short term job of eliminating the communist danger, we have the equally important longer range job of ending this mass psychological flight towards amorality and of restoring convincing reasons for men once again to strive to live up to moral and humanitarian ideals. Otherwise, there is no chance of saving our Christian style civilization. Otherwise, there is no chance of saving our Christian style civilization from self destruction. And it will merely go down to chaos and the ultimate serpent of the weak under the strong more lingeringly than if it is destroyed and its once free members are enslaved by the communists. We should return to the constructive side of this need and this undertaking in the morning. Section four. And so let's act. We come now to the question of what is to be done about these problems. The very first thing we must realize is that is that there is no easy formula possible nor brilliant scheme devisable for beating the communists. The conspiracy is now incredibly well organized. It is so well financed that it has billions of dollars annually just to spend on propaganda. It has the benefit of decades of successful experience. It has one set goal of world rule by any means to which every act in all of the lives of some 40,000,000 party members are now wholly subservient. And it is guided by men who had to have supreme cunning and ruthlessness to have achieved their present positions within the conspiracy itself. The human race has never before faced any such monster of power which was determined to enslave it. But there is one basic consideration of tremendous importance which we must always keep in mind. This is that communism has been imposed and must always be imposed from the top down by trickery and terror, and that it must then be maintained by terror. Truth, reality, human instinct, and the overwhelming weight of human desire are on our side. We have these points in our favor against a conspiracy which must depend on falsehood, cunning, and terror utilized by less than 5% of the total population. To feel that we cannot win that struggle is a form of pessimism to which I, for one, shall never yield. What I have What I have chiefly intended this brief introduction to lead to, therefore, is the realization that every effort we undertake, every battle we fight, even if we lose it, and every sacrifice we make is cumulative. Every bit of dedication to the cause is worthwhile. Obviously, the place for us to begin is in The United States because the American support of the international communist conspiracy is now the backbone of its strength and has been for many years. If and when we can reach the point of turning just the American government from actively helping the communist conspiracy everywhere in the world, we shall have won a most important battle in the war ahead. The amount of work required to do that in the face of a way the cards have been so painstakingly stacked against us is something to contemplate. And yet there is nothing but work and more work, thinking and more thinking, dedication and more dedication, which will do the job. So now let's look at the job itself. One, first we would establish reading rooms, small and inexpensive, in just as many of the cities, towns, and villages of this country as we could, just as rapidly as we could. Two, second, since getting the truth about both recent history and current events into as many hands and heads as possible is so important, we would see that the circulation of the conservative periodicals was expanded as rapidly as it could be done without too much waste. Three, we would do everything we could to support, maintain, increase the number of stations used, and widen the audiences of such radio programs as those of Fulton Lewis, Clarence Manion, and dozens of more localized broadcasters throughout the country. Four, we would institute the organized planning and control to make full and effectively coordinated use of the powerful letter writing weapon that lies so ready at hand. Five, we would organize fronts, little fronts, big fronts, temporary fronts, permanent fronts, all kinds of fronts. Six, another thing we should do, and one badly needed, would be to start shocking the American people or an increasing percentage of the more literate and more intelligent who have not yet been completely brainwashed into a realization of what is happening, into a dawning realization of how far and how completely how completely communist and communist influence have crept right into their communities, into institutions and activities where the general public does not have the slightest suspicion of such infiltration. The best way to do this is by exposure, which is why the communists just had to get rid of McCarthy and went to such extreme lengths to do so. Seven, There are now dozens of slimy characters loose in our midst whom I will call to your attention by describing one who is more or less typical. His usual name is Gordon Hall, though he also uses and has used many aliases, and we could silence him and those like him with comparative ease. Eight, we would line up a large list of speakers ourselves all over the country. Nine, ninth and current in this listing would be our undertakings on the international front. For many reasons, we would start extending our body into other countries as soon as there were energy and resources which could properly be spared for that purpose. 10. Finally, and probably most important of all these courses of action, we would put our weight into the political scales in this country just as fast and far as we could. We are at a stage, gentlemen, where the only sure political victories are achieved by nonpolitical organizations, by organization which has a surer, more positive, and more permanent purpose than the immediate political goals that are only means to an end by organization which has a backbone and cohesiveness and strength and definiteness of direction, which are impossible for the old style political party organization. Fantastic? Of course, it's fantastic, but everything I am talking is fantastic. We are living in fantastic times and a fantastic situation. The alternative to sufficiently fantastic measures and efforts is a fate of fantastic suffering for our children and the equally fantastic loss of a whole humane civilization that has cost countless sacrifices, immeasurable labor, and an infinite number of noble dreams across centuries in the building. We are in circumstances where it is realistic to be fantastic. I was careful to bring into this group only men of sufficient intelligence and imagination to understand that paradox. And tomorrow morning, I hope to make the realism of this afternoon's hypothesis and these proposals at least as believable as is the unbelievable present power of the forces of evil arrayed against us. May you have a good dinner, a little cease from such serious thoughts, and a good night's sleep in the meantime. Under Positive Leadership. This morning, in retracing our footsteps, we come first to the cancel of collectivism, to the question of how to stop its further ravages and how to restore the American body politic to good health, renewed strength, and as much promise for the future as is possible in view of the damage already done. And that, gentlemen, brings me to one of the basic purposes for which this meeting was called. It is one which I approach with great humility, but with no misgivings as to its necessity. For we simply are not going to be able to save our country from either the immediate threat of communism or the long range threat of socialism by organizational leadership. Our only possible chance is dynamic personal leadership. Let me begin with an illustration of the difference which also supports the argument. In 1952, I disagreed with Bob Taft on at least three of his 10 most important political principles. Yet I had made 25 radio speeches for Taft in the primary campaign on my own time and my own money. I was wholeheartedly and enthusiastically for Taft for the nomination and the presidency because I trusted him, and he was going generally in my direction. The fact that he didn't see two or three issues out of 10 the way I saw them didn't dampen the energy of my personal support for him in the slightest. But if and when I am a member of any organization, political or otherwise, and there is disagreement on the part of the any sizable percentage of the membership as to three out of 10 of the organization's policies are planks, a splintering of the organization into two groups is almost inevitable. Personal leadership holds together a following in the way that organizational leadership never can. At present, we are in the position of trying to defeat a disciplined, well armed, expertly commanded army with a collection of debating societies, and it can't be done. So let's look briefly at the possibility, the advantages, the disadvantages of finding this desperately needed leader in the political field. And the easiest way to do this is to conduct a discussion around some individual from the very start. Now the one man who comes nearest to measuring up to all the needs and qualifications whom we see on the political horizon at the present time is Barry Goldwater. I know Barry fairly well. I'd love to see him president of The United States. I'd love to see him president of The United States, and maybe someday we shall. But does anybody in this room think there is any slightest chance of Barry Goldwater supplying the dynamic overall leadership needed to save this country for anybody to be president of? If so, I think he is still not fully aware of the nature and totality of the forces at work. For Goldwater, by the very circumstances of his political success, present prestige, and the expectations of his supporters, will inevitably think and move in terms of political warfare, Even if he personally should reach the point and the understanding of wanting to consider political action as just a part, no matter how important, of much broader overall action, how much chance do you think there is that his friends and supporters would let him step out of the strictly political role in which he has been so successful? How much chance is there that they would let him build and utilize forceful leadership on all of the other fronts where we must fight the communists? How many of the steps which we discussed yesterday afternoon, and which I am sure must be taken if we are to have any chance at all, do you think you could count on Barry Goldwater's leadership to bring about no matter how much he was beseeched and no matter how much he himself came to feel inclined to do so. Or more more for the other illustrative points that will arise than for any hopes offered by the prospect, let's look at Richard Nixon in this connection. He is an extremely smart man. He is one of the ablest, shrewdest, most disingenuous, and slippiest politicians that ever showed up on the American scene. He can sit in Washington one night and convince some of the most modern Republicans that he's the best ball carrier they have, and spend four hours in the Waldorf Towers the next day convincing MacArthur and Herbert Hoover that he is their man. He can use the tremendously overrated and over publicized, but actually highly cautious part he played in the Alger Hiss exposure to hang on to the hopeful loyalty of the vigorous anti communists at the very time when he is insinuating himself into the good graces of the left by quietly knifing McCarthy. Nixon could pose as a conservative Republican congressman and yet be one of the original founders in 1950 of Republican advance. This was intended to be not the Republican opposition to, but the Republican team made of Americans for democratic action, and it even had some interlocking left wingers who were members of both groups. Nixon can claim still to be vigorously anticommunist, yet when he has a chance as vice president to break the tie and cast the decisive vote for h r three to reestablish some chance of prosecution of subversives actually advocating violent overthrow of our government, what happens? He moves heaven and earth to have Wallace Bennett found and pressured into voting against h r three, defeating the measure so that the vice president will not have to vote. What good would such a man be to us even as president unless outside forces and accomplishments made it opportunistic and expedient for him to ride an anti communist wave which those outside forces had created? As for being a leader, the sad truth, hard for many hopeful and wishful conservative Republicans to realize, is that Richard Nixon, a most engaging personality and clever politician, has never been a leader in connection with any event or development or at any stage in his career. He has been a rider of waves so far as public support was concerned and a manipulator of uncanny skill behind the scenes. I have made these remarks here in this really inner circle group in order to emphasize the wisdom of the old advice, put not your faith in politicians. I am thoroughly convinced that we cannot count on politicians, political leadership, or even political action except as a part of something much deeper and broader to save us. Now I didn't always feel that way, and I think that up to the time that the nomination was stolen from Bob Taft in 1952, it was still possible to have saved our country from the immediate communist danger anyway, primarily by political action. But my study of the whole picture convinced me more and more that one, no one outspoken senator, nor a dozen outspoken senators, and no amount of the ephemeral political support they might muster could possibly save our country unless unless there was encompassing them and their efforts and support this far larger and broader movement to which I keep referring. Two, that there was not going to be any such movement without the dynamic overall personal leadership to which I have also been referring and three, that with all of my own shortcomings there wasn't anybody else on the horizon willing to give their whole lives to the job with the determination and dedication I would put into it if I didn't. What really moved me to cross this Rubicon, however, the consideration which more than any other gradually brought me the necessary measure of courage and determination for so staggering an undertaking, was another result of many years of study of not only the present but the past. This is the conviction that even warding off communist slavery and reversing the socialist trend is only half the battle. We can never win even that half unless both leadership and following have a positive dream which is more important as a hope than the negative nightmare is as a fear, unless the promise of what we can build supplies more motivation than the terror of what we must destroy, and unless this faith in the future is based on a deeper faith in eternal truths. The nature of these truths and the tenets of this faith, which I hope and believe every man in this room can accept and approve, I shall come to later this morning. What I am trying to do here as an introduction to and part of our thinking about how to rid America of the collectivist cancer is simply this: I want to convince you, as I am convinced, that only dynamic personal leadership offers any chance for us to save either our material or our spiritual inheritance. I want to convince you, as I am convinced, that even under such leadership, we have no chance unless the specific battles are fought as part of a larger and more lasting movement to restore once again an upward reach to the heart of man. And I wish to make clear what you are bound to be assuming already, that with whatever I have in me of faith, dedication, and energy, I intend to offer that leadership to all who are willing to help me. Section six, to restore responsibility. With that much explanation as background, let's see what basic principle we can establish and what specific objective we can define with regard to the particular battle against collectivism. And it seems to me, gentlemen, that the whole essence of our purpose can be summarized in just five words, less government and more responsibility. The principle is simple enough for all to understand, and yet it is broad enough, I believe, to be comprehensive with regard to all that we really desire to attain through political action. We must try to make it a convincing political standard and an accepted goal. What we must start asking our fellow citizens everywhere to consider is this: On the basis of all known past human experience, are there any general conclusions with regard to the organization of society which can be set forth with confidence? It seems to me clear that there certainly are. One, first, government is necessary some degree of government in any civilized society. Two, second, while government is necessary, it is basically a nonproductive expense, an overhead cost supported by the productive economy. Third, government is frequently evil. Fourth, government is always and inevitably an enemy of individual freedom. Whatever must be done by government will always cost more than if it could be done by individuals or smaller groups. Sixth, government, by its size, its momentum, and its authority, will not only perpetuate errors of doctrine or of policy longer than they would otherwise retain acceptance, but it will multiply their effect on a geometric scale as against the arithmetical cumulative effect of those errors if confined to individuals or smaller groups. As any society becomes reasonably settled and shakes down into a semi permanent pattern of economic and political life, the drive always begins to have government become the management of the social enterprise rather than merely its agent for certain clear purposes. Yet a government trying to step in and improve the working of a free market is exactly like a man who takes a lighted lantern outdoors at noon of a bright June day to show you the sun. As a government increases in power, and as a means of increasing its power, it always has a tendency to squeeze out the middle class, to destroy or weaken the middle for the benefit of the top and the bottom. Nine, the form of government is not nearly so important as its quality. 10, which brings us to the last, and in my opinion the most important, of these basic generalizations concerning government. And our tenth point is that neither the form of government nor its quality is as important as its quantity. The increasing quantity of government in all nations has constituted the greatest tragedy of the twentieth century. The greatest enemy of man is and always has been government. And the larger, the more extensive that government, the greater the enemy. The communists believe that a collectivist society should swallow up all individuals, make their lives and their energies completely subservient to the needs and the purposes of the collective estate and that any means are permissible to achieve this end. The true Americanist believes that the individual should retain the freedom to make his own bargain with life and the responsibility for the results of that bargain, and that means are as important as ends in the civilized social order which he desires. There are many stages of welterism, socialism, and collectivism in general, but communism is the ultimate state of them all, and they all lead inevitably in that direction. In this final state, communism, you have a society in which class distinctions are greater than in any other, but where position in these classes is determined solely by demagogic political skill and ruthless cunning. And you have a society in which every fault of government that we have discussed above is held to be a benefit and a desirable part of the framework of life. But there is an exactly opposite direction. This direction leads toward a governmental environment for human life founded on the basis of long experience with government, on experience which shows government to be a necessary evil but a continuous brake on all progress and the ultimate enemy of all freedom. It is the forward direction, the upward direction, and Americanism, I hope, shall become its name. Section seven, and help to build a better world. We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams. We, in the ages lying in the buried past of the earth, built Nineveh with our sign and Babel itself with our mirth, and overthrew them with prophesying to the old of the new world's work. For each age is a dream that is dying or one that is coming to birth. For the last fifty years, our age has been a dream that was dying. To this very group, at this very moment, I am proposing that we turn our faces forward instead of backward, begin to make even our defensive actions fit into a constructive design, and do our part to usher in a new age that is coming to birth. Now I don't expect the New York Times to begin announcing excitedly in January that obviously the war started on a new era in Indianapolis in December 1958. Of course, it is only the work we do afterwards, the work we persuade and inspire others to do, and the long results and widening reach of both that can make of this meeting anything but a two day seminar in philosophy and current affairs. But if every man here should leave tonight feeling in his own mind that he had been at the beginning of a new chapter in history, it would be true. It would be true no matter how long the historians might take to find it out. The basic reason why our old age is dying, as I tried yesterday to make clear, is that the faith which was the core of its strength no longer commands the unquestioning loyalty of enough of its devotees. For the dream of any nation or any people must depend on faith. The foundation of our new dream must be faith or it will never come to pass. Where is this faith, and what is this faith so true that neither our hearts nor our reasons can deny it, so broad that it takes in without violation the faith of our fathers, and so deep that it can inspire martyrdom at need? As to where, it's right in front of us. And as to what, it is exactly what we in this room already and actually believe. Now first let me repeat here for the devote Catholics and fundamentalist Protestants who are among my best friends and strongest supporters, that it is no part of my purpose to disturb their beliefs in the slightest or the beliefs of any man or woman who really does have a religious faith instead of just the shell of one. What I am concerned about, what we must all be vitally concerned about today as the very essence of our problem, is morality, integrity, and purpose. That morality must be based on a bedrock of faith. For those who already have such a bedrock of faith and stand on it and abide by it, I can offer nothing, and I would certainly take nothing away. But for those who are no longer sure exactly where they do stand, on what rocks or how firmly, I want to try to show them that all of these bedrocks together constitute a foundation with room and strength for us all. For unless we willingly anchor our moral judgments to eternal truths, we become just chaff, blown always before the winds of confusion. For I doubt not through the ages one increasing purpose runs. That there is a purpose in man beyond anything called for by his individual needs, and far greater than his personal desires, can be denied only by the most depraved maniac or the most ignorant fool. One of the best summarizations of the force and beauty and eternal quality of that purpose is contained in William Herbert Carruth's Each in His Own Tongue, which I should like to recall to your minds: A picket frozen on duty, a mother starved for her brood, Socrates drinking the hemlock, and Jesus on the road, and millions who humble and nameless the straight hard pathway plod. Some call it consecration, and others call it God. Who can read that, realize the incontrovertible and wonderful truth of the story of man's purpose at work which the poet tells, and fail to feel reverently bound to serve that same purpose faithfully and well. What is that purpose? And this, too, has been summarized by yet another poet in just one brilliant line: Thou hast put an upward reach in the heart of man. Not only are we a part of some mighty purpose beyond our understanding, and not only do we have a clear duty to be true to that purpose to the fullest extent that we are allowed to grasp its workings and its direction, But all human experience shows that the total happiness of any generation and of its posterity is directly tied to the respect of that generation for the upward reach in man's nature. We have all the reason here that man can ask, divine or human or pragmatic, for keeping our consciences attuned to the emotions and impulses which increase man's upward reach, and for then obeying those consciences, obeying by commission as well as omission, to the utmost of our respective will powers and abilities. The substance of my conscience, as I believe it is really the substance of the conscience of every man in this room, was gratitude and a corresponding sense of responsibility. Gratitude, if you will let me paraphrase Henley's line without the slightest implication of blasphemy, gratitude to whatever god there was, and gratitude to all of the noblemen of the past for the life and the environment for that life which was given me, and responsibility to God and man to be worthy so far as I was able of the human race at its best. And, gentlemen, what firmer foundation can we possibly need for the faith on which to build our new age and with which to inaugurate the dream that is coming to birth? Wherever we turn in looking at whatever blessings we have for the present and hopes for the future, we find a need for gratitude that makes the acceptance of responsibility a duty and a source of inward happiness. Consider, for instance and for an instant, the blessing of freedom. Kipling once wrote truly, all we know of freedom, all we need to know, this our fathers won for us long and long ago. Are we, as Lowell put it, going to be traitors to our sires and lose that freedom for our children and their children? McCauley had horacious say, and how can man die better than facing fearful odds for the ashes of his followers and the temples of his gods? And so we ask ourselves in simple sincerity, if it becomes necessary, just how can man die better, especially if in doing so he appreciably reduces the odds faced by his compatriots in their fight against the overwhelming forces of evil threatening us today. But it is not even to the martyrs, perhaps, that we owe the most. There have been missionaries and scholars, the Catholic monks of the Middle Ages, poets and philosophers, builders and explorers, statesmen and scientists throughout centuries receding into the unknown past who have toiled and dreamed and sacrificed and died that you and I might have the comforts and freedoms and hopes that we enjoy now in so fair and happy a land. One of the worst and most sad and disturbing traits of many of our young people today is that they take their inheritance for granted and have no thought of its cost. This is a vital part of the moral breakdown that is endangering our civilization. It shows how basic and necessary a component of faith is man's feeling of continuity and gratitude. Let us, with a faith for the future based on this very principle of gratitude to God and man, live up to by ourselves and made a living and articulate faith for others by both example and teaching, let us try to bring many of these young people who are now at loose ends because of their lack of any faith back into the conscious current of man's increasing purpose. For a code of honor and an ennobling sense of responsibility are themselves gifts to the human soul which have been won by its upward reach. And so, gentlemen, without any claim to goodness, wisdom, or originality, I have tried in far too short a time for so huge a subject to indicate to you the elements of a faith which I still hope and believe is shared by all of you, no matter how differently you might have explained or expressed it. It is a faith for which I have earnestly hoped that it might encompass the individual beliefs of most men of goodwill, that it might refill our ancient bunks of inspiration, and that it would become a basis and a beginning of renewed dedication to a dream of man's future. Section eight, through the John Birch Society. Now, how do we go about asking men, in the words of Santayana, to trust the soul's invincible surmise? We come at long last to the question of ways and means and methods. In connection with all of these plans and aims and hopes, I am proposing, as the most immediately tangible outcome of this meeting the formation of the John Society. And I ask you not to give undue thought at present to the name. In the small packets for each of you, there are copies of my little book, The Life of John Birch. I hope you will read it when you have the opportunity. If you have not already done so, or even if you have, you will find and I believe agree that John Birch possessed in his own character all of those noble traits and ideals which we should like to see become symbolized by the John Birch Society, and the kind of life of peaceful opportunity and responsibility which John Birch wanted for his fellow Americans, and for his Chinese friends and for all men of goodwill, is exactly the kind of life we should like to see possible everywhere. It is my fervent hope that the John Birch Society will last for hundreds of years and exert an increasing influence for the temporal good and the spiritual ennoblement of mankind throughout those centuries. For I am staking my whole aspiration to play my part in forwarding man's one increasing purpose on whatever can be accomplished through it. The John Birch Society is to be a monolithic body, a republican form of government or of organization has many attractions and advantages under certain favorable conditions. But under less happy circumstances, it lends itself too readily to infiltration, distortion, and disruption. And democracy, of course, in government or organization, as the Greeks and Romans both found out, and as I believe every man in this room clearly recognizes, democracy is merely a deceptive phrase, a weapon of demagoguery, and a perennial fraud. The fear of tyrannical oppression of individuals and other arguments against the authoritative structure in the form of governments have little bearing on the case of a voluntary association where the authoritative power can be exercised and enforced only by persuasion. And what little validity they do have is outweighed by the advantages of firm and positive direction of the society's energies. Especially for the near future and for the fight against communism, which is the first great task of the society, it is imperative that all the strength we can muster be subject to smoothly functioning direction from the top. As I have said before, no collection of debating societies is ever going to stop the communist conspiracy from taking us over. And I have I have no intention of adding another frustrated group to their number. We mean business every step of the way. We can allow for differences of opinion. We shall need and welcome advice, and we expect to use the normal measure of diplomacy always called for in dealing with human beings. But whenever differences of opinion become translated into a lack of loyal support, we shall have shortcuts for eliminating both without going through any congress of so called democratic processes. Otherwise, communist infiltrators could bog us down in interminable disagreements, schisms, and feuds before we ever became seriously effective. The purpose of the John Birch Society, as officially stated, will be to promote less government, more responsibility, and a better world. That says it all. Members of the John Birch Society, not only in The United States but anywhere in the world, not only can be good patriots in their respective countries but necessarily will be. For internationalism, as it is conceived and promoted today, is an attempt to impose more government and a more centralized one world government on all of us everywhere. For that reason, it is automatically contrary to everything we stand for and one of the movements we shall oppose with all the strength we can. The John Birch Society will function almost entirely through small local chapters. Each will have a chapter leader appointed through officers of the society in the field who have themselves been duly appointed by headquarters. The dues are whatever the member wants to make them, with a minimum of $24 per year for men and $12 per year for women. We should expect the chapter leader to get all of his or her chapters together at least once a month, and in many cases, oftener. And we expect the chapter leader to be in practically continuous contact with his or her members to whatever extent may be necessary. For handling the organizational mechanics of the society and for helping to form new chapters, we shall have a paid staff man with a title of coordinator for each area of the prophesized. Above these coordinators, in time, we shall have supervisors with the rank or title of major coordinators, and we shall further build the organizational framework from the bottom up as made necessary by sufficient membership. We are expecting far more work and dedication and far more sacrifice of other interests on the part of those who do become members of the John Birch Society than you have ever thought of giving to any other organization which you joined or even considered joining. For unless we have the cumulative weight and effect of such solid effort and sacrifice on the part of our members as a weapon to be wielded against the Communists, we are certainly not going to be able to hold on to even the increasingly confused, dark, and immoral world we now have, much less help to build a better one. So we are asking for a lot, and we want you to know it if and when you sign an application blank for membership in the John Birch Society. That brings us next to a consideration as to the very nature of our undertaking, which needs to be made clear. For all revolutions, as Metternich once pointed out, begin in the best minds and work downward. While most religions begin at the bottom with the masses and gradually acquire both respectability and acceptance at the top. We are neither and both. Far from founding a religion, we are merely urging Protestants, Catholics, Jews, or Muslims to be better Christians, better Jews, better Muslims in accordance with the deepest and most humanitarian promptings of their own religious beliefs. And we are simply trying to draw a circle of faith in God's power and purpose and of man's relationship to both, which is broad and inclusive enough to take each man's specific faith into that circle without violation. Yet the evangelical fervor with which we expect our members to fight the forces of evil and work for a better world makes certain principles with regard to religious groups apply to ourselves. We are not beginning any revolution, or even a counterrevolution in any technical sense, because while we are opposing a conspiracy, we are not ourselves making use of conspiratorial methods. Yet our determination to overthrow an entrenched tyranny is the very stuff out of which revolutions are made. The net result of these reflections is that we are not a copy of any movement of the past. We are unique. We are ourselves. We are something new as befits a moving force for a new age. We believe in profiting by all human experience, but we shall make our own amalgam of the organizational medals forged by that experience with the mercury of our own purpose. Without donning sackcloth and ashes, we shall try to inspire saintly men to join our efforts to make this a better world. And without building barricades in the streets, we shall still try to rally rational men to our efforts to preserve the best of the world we already have. And now, gentlemen, I am nearing the end of the semiformal part of this long undertaking As to what is expected of you in either effort or money, if you are thinking of halfway measures, we might as well quit now. But I might as well also reveal my fanaticism by telling you that there is no force and no discouragement which could make me quit or even put less of my life and energy into the struggle. The last resort of my own mind has been expressed by Louise Image in Guinea to fear not sensible failure nor covet the game at all, but fighting, fighting, fighting, guy driven against the wall. I repeat, however, that we do not have to die driven against any wall, nor do we have to lose the struggle at all. As I've said elsewhere, there's enough strength, enough money, enough intelligence, and enough patriotism in the vast business community of America to form the nucleus that will stop and destroy the communist conspiracy if we can stir it to action in time. What I am proposing here is the mechanics and the leadership through men like yourselves by which it can be stirred to action and that action made effective. Let me repeat just one thing that I said to you yesterday morning. There are in the satellite countries today thousands of men just like you and me who only ten years ago could regularly meet in such groups as I propose. Not only that, but they could go out openly with and before larger groups to try to spread the alarm and to stop the communists from taking over their countries. These men now say to each other, but largely to themselves, if I had only known, if I had only recognized and believed the danger and the horror of communist rule in time. There is nothing I would not have given to save my freedom, my family, my country if I had only recognized the urgency and the desperate need. Now it is all too late, and any sacrifice even of life itself would be entirely in vain. We do not have to be too late, and we do not have to lose the fight. Commonism has its weaknesses, and the conspiracy has its vulnerable points. We have many layers of strength not yet rotted by all of the infiltration and political sabotage to which we have been subjected. Our danger is both immense and imminent, but it is not beyond the possibility of being overcome by the resistance that is still available. All we must find and build and use to win is sufficient understanding. Let's create that understanding and build that resistance with everything mortal men can put into the effort while there still is time. Then, while we are destroying and after we have destroyed the communist tyranny, let's drive on towards our higher goals of more permanent accomplishment, towards an era of less government and more responsibility in which we can create a better world. Speaker 1: And now ladies and gentlemen, you can simply be yourselves again. Fifteen years after that last setting, we are over 2,000 Berkshires and friends at dinner together in Los Angeles on 03/09/1974. Those of us at this table that were a part of that party of 11, and I'm sure all of you, now have a realization of how accurately prophetic Mr. Welch was fifteen years ago. Now let's save time for him by omitting any further introduction or comment by me or applause by you as we as we hear what he has to say about the next fifteen years. Bob? Speaker 2: Ladies and gentlemen, we shall now condense what needs at least two full days into thirty minutes. So please forgive the extent to which these remarks become both cryptic and staccato. We pick up at the point where I had just finished the last line of the two day presentation at Indianapolis. Then McMillan leaned forward in his chair, holding out towards me what looked like an old envelope on which he had been scribbling. I stepped forward, took it, went back behind the podium, and then, to my delighted surprise, was able to hold up for the other 10 men to see a check from Ben to the John Birch Society for a thousand dollars with a note that read, Here, Bob, we are in business. Indeed, we were in business at once, and as Bob Stoddart has pointed out, in relatively better financial position than we have ever been since. What's more, we proceeded to survive in a bitterly hostile environment and are now still celebrating our fifteenth anniversary which occurred exactly three months ago. So we begin this look toward the future with an extremely brief glance at the past. Section Some Points to Remember. One, throughout all of the diverse pulling and pressures from within and from without, the society has been kept strictly on its originally charted course. Two, it is still unique as the only cohesive voluntary non religious organization for adult education on a permanent nationwide basis in all human history. Three, Consequently, the society has had to become a pioneer in almost every respect, not only as to its organizational structure but by creating its own means and methods for carrying out this educational task. Four, it offers the only kind of opposition which the collectivists in general and the contemporary international conspiracy in particular have never faced before. We have maintained education as our total strategy and truth as our only weapon. So the conspiracy has known only one way to fight back, which was never try to refute the accusations but always seek to destroy the accuser. Consequently, the society from the time it was two years old began to face more vicious smears, lying propaganda, massive attacks, and undermining tactics than have ever been turned on any other non religious group in America. Pride. Despite those impediments, our thoroughly organized educational program is now functioning solidly, continuously, and with rapidly increasing effectiveness in all 50 States. Also, at an embryonic stage in three foreign countries, and with and with an amorphous influence that extends thinly throughout the world. Sixth, the educational tools and methods of the John Birch Society now include books, pamphlets, and reprints distributed by the millions of copies per year a monthly and a weekly magazine which are becoming increasingly recognized as authoritative in their field films, film strips, records, reel to reel tapes, and cassettes which altogether are played to an enormous quantity of people and a speakers bureau which, when measured by the number of engagements filled or the total audience reached, we believe to be the largest in the world. Through literally thousands of ad hoc committees, including our speakers' forums, we have multiplied the reach and effectiveness of our actual members at least fourfold. Eight, through the tireless patriotic thought, labor, and dedication of its staff and tens of thousands of its members, the society has played an extremely important role in certain basic battles staged by the conspiracy. These have included our part in preventing the establishment of a Negro Soviet Republic in the Southeastern States. Our stopping cold almost entirely through the impact of Allen Stang's pamphlets and speeches, a similar movement by Reyes T. Arena to set up a Chicano independent government in some of our Southwestern states, and largely by using patriotic Indians as our speakers and project leaders, our current blocking of a similar American Indian movement so decisively that the communist controlled scoundrels at the head of it are blaming us for all of their troubles. With regard to more explicit activities, let us offer an example. The notorious doctor Martin Luther King was as foul, a pro communist, philandering, big spending, trouble making, violence creating, liar, and crook as the conspiracy has ever sponsored in any of its programs against any people. And almost single handed, through our very courageous and patriotic Negro speakers, We exposed these facts so thoroughly that King became only an embarrassment to the insiders like Nelson Rockefeller who were financing his carnival show. In fact, during the last weeks of his life, King canceled entirely the whole series of speeches already set up for him on a tour from Memphis to Richmond and back, rather than be up against the exposures in a parallel series of speeches over the same area by our speaker, Julia Brown. He could could no longer be of any practical value to the insiders at all as a live agitator, but only as a falsely glorified dead martyr. So much to our regret, that gruesome transformation was arranged by the conspiracy in very short order. Also, let us mention the magnificent role played by our support your local police committees all over The United States in putting an almost complete end to the communist inspired and communist controlled civilian police review boards. These boards boards had been designed for the ruthless harassment of all police officers who tried to do their duty in handling communist criminals and agitators, and there have been about 40 other similar specific accomplishments of major or appreciable importance for which the society has been responsible in the course of its efforts to expose and slow down or stop various projects of the conspiracy. 10, and most important of all is a general consideration. For a dozen years, there have been unceasing efforts, mostly behind the scenes on the part of both Richard Nixon and William F. Buckley, Jr, to damage or destroy the John Birch Society. There have been more open but recurrent attacks, frequently laced with vicious lies, for the same purpose on the part of some 30 senators, governors, and pundits of the press and the airwaves. Yet despite all of these smears, the standing and character of our members, the dependability of our educational tools, and the quality of our methods have gradually brought about an immense change in the attitude of the public towards the John Birch Society until today the fraction of the public that feels favorably towards the society has climbed from about 4% to at least 50%. And a final measure of our value to the anti communist cause can be expressed most comprehensively in a single thought. Suppose there had been no John Birch Society at all and no sign of its educational program over these past fifteen years. Then just try to imagine how much more completely in the dark the American people would be today about all that is happening and how tremendously easier it would be for the insiders of the conspiracy to carry out the final steps in their plot to enslave us. Section B, how fares the other side? One, for almost two hundred years, the goal of this self perpetuating conspiracy has been to destroy all religion, all regularly established governments, and all traditional human institutions, and then to impose its new world order on the chaotic ruins that will be left. The conspirators have never been able to destroy anything of importance, however, by attacks from the outside, but only by subversion from the inside. Almost every member of the conspiracy, therefore, leads a continuous life of falsehood to his friends, of pretense to the public, and of underlying doubt with regard to his own future. From Alger Hiss to Richard Nixon, every communist or insider has a gnawing fear that although he is a peacock today, he may be a feather duster tomorrow. The abnormality of such existence adds up to a basic liability which is forever, tugging away at the solidity of the whole conspiratorial organization. And the effects of this defiance of all normal human instincts are beginning to show up today on the whole international scene more clearly than ever before. The insiders and the Illuminati before them have always intended that about 3% of any population should have absolute rule over the other 97%. This is because their obscene lust for power is more happily satisfied by success in proportion to the scarcity of others who also enjoy the prerequisites of power in other words, by an inverse ratio. This seems a very strange and cruel psychological quirk to traditional Americans in a country where even those with the ambition and ability to become very rich have always wanted to see others become rich also, and to have everybody around them enjoy all the comforts and even luxuries of an increasing national prosperity. And this attitude alone on the part of the insiders, as demonstrated at present by their calculated effort to wipe out the whole middle class and to reduce everybody but themselves to a level of bare subsistence, is going to militate very strongly against them as their design becomes more obvious. The whole conspiracy always has been and still is an overextended, very thin shell of power being constantly enlarged by bluff, audacity, and the ruthless use of terror, terror to smother all resistance piecemeal. The insiders themselves never know just when or where this shell may be broken, nor how serious the break may be. The forced exile of the pro communist King Constantine of Greece by an anti communist military junta was one example. A more recent one has been the replacement of Salvador Allendi, the communist boss and would be tyrant of Chile, by an anti communist military group. Which certainly seems, as does the one in Greece, to be determined to restore a constitutional republican government to their respective countries as rapidly as possible. The conspiracy certainly cannot be sure of what is going to happen on Mainland China when Mao Chitung dies or how long Willy Brandt can last in West Germany when despite all of the moral support that Richard Nixon could give him, he still barely won the last election in 1972 by two votes which were purchased through outright bribery? Also, of course, Pierre Elliott Trudeau, still ruling Canada without even a majority, could have the sordid facts of his utterly treasonous and criminal past begin to catch up with him in the minds of the Canadians. And there are a dozen other seriously weak spots in the shell where there could be a blowout at any time. Four, in Soviet Russia itself, as you may learn from all the trustworthy news that you can excavate, there is doubt that even another stallion could hold the lid down tight enough on the boiling pot. There is a crime wave among the youth at least equal to our own. Over half of all crimes of assault, robbery, rape, and hooliganism by children of the ages of 16 and 17 are due to intoxication. A recent report showed that over eighty percent of these youngsters had started drinking vodka before they were 16. There are now increased fines for parents and jail sentences for others who encourage youth 18 to escapism from sordid reality by the nepenthe of alcohol. But even these tender attentions from a loving big brother government do not seem to provide the promised degree of bliss in this communist paradise. Nor does anything else. Charges of ideological aberration and even treasonous heresy by some officials against other officials have become commonplace. Saul Shennison has had plenty of company among scientists as well as other writers in risking imprisonment, torture, or death for complaining about the inhuman conditions and the spread of terror in many parts of the vast Soviet Union besides the prison camps. Even after half a century of unceasing attempts to stamp out all religion, the powers that be today and have some hopes of still being tomorrow are now having some trouble with a religious revival, more trouble than for many years. Indeed, the resistance of all kinds at any cost has now gone so far that for the first time Soviet planes on domestic flights are being hijacked by Soviet citizens in attempts to escape. The plain truth is that the commissars who are trying to rule the Soviet Union today are sitting on a powder keg which would blow up at any minute that they cease to have the ostentatious financial support, moral support, and material support of the United States government. And the same thing is true of a great many other regions within the vast communist corral of nations. Five, the truth is that everything now depends more than ever before on what happens in The United States, and this is a shaky read on which the insiders are leaning. They are using the protracted assault on Nixon to distract American minds from what Nixon is still doing to advance communist plans, Also, to cause distrust and despair in American minds about our whole economic political system so as to get an easier acceptance of drastic changes which spell communism. But they are also generating some very serious bitterness and rivalries within top revolutionary circles. Few men, if any, have ever done more to increase communist power and prestige at home and abroad than Richard Nixon, And few have been more skillful at cementing grateful communist commissars and ambitious insiders into the circle of his own support. Yet some of the most powerful insiders seem determined to throw Nixon overboard in order to put more power directly into the hands of the Rockefeller faction and such Rockefeller agents as Henry Kissinger. And we believe that they are thereby creating a lot of future headaches for the whole conspiracy. Sixth, more important than any of these considerations, however, is a now rapid awakening among the American people. What happened to the Equal Rights Amendment last year and to the genocide treaty and the land use bill this year are just straws in the wind. The insiders have not dared to install actual rationing of gasoline, which they have so badly wanted, nor has the Nixon administration yet dared to establish full diplomatic relations with Red China. Also, we think the present obvious intention to surrender the Panama Canal completely into international communist hands through the communist government of Panama may run into quite a jolt if a million bumper stickers appear on that many American cars reading as follows, don't give Panama our canal, give them Kissinger instead. And ladies and gentlemen, we are accepting orders for those stickers right now at four for $1. Seven, these are also straws in the wind, but the insiders can see which way the straws are blowing. The Nixon administration already has executive orders on the books sufficient to establish a complete dictatorship. But Nixon does not dare to make a protest of either their reception or their constitutionality. Regional government is being pushed hard, but still on the phony pretense of increasing Federal cooperation with State and local governments rather than usurping all of their functions and powers. The drive for more and bigger crime waves, although fully supported and encouraged by the pro communist governors of at least five States, has not yet dared go far enough to make the American people welcome a national gestapo. All of the conspiratorial forces with municipal, state, and federal backing have not yet succeeded in taking our guns away from us, and the insiders have never been able. The insiders have never been able to establish permanent communist rule over any country whose citizens were armed. Eight, and the biggest problem of the whole conspiracy, as we said in the March bulletin, is even more basic. It is the incredible strength, productivity, resourcefulness, and momentum of the American free enterprise system which makes it so extremely difficult to destroy. Also, there is a changing mood, a rising spirit of anger and determination coming up in the American people which is crowding the insiders into a race against time, for time, like truth, is on our side. So with all of these factors and circumstances in mind, we solemnly ask ourselves how stands the battle today. And in deadly seriousness, we repeat the answer that we started giving you in 1973, early in the year. We think that for the past year, the objective odds have been, and as of today still are, about even in this struggle for victory by either side. This is because we now have the size and strength and resources that I am sorry, that is a misprint. This is not because we now have the size nothing got left out. This is not because we now have the size and strength and resources to meet the enemy on realistic terms. Not at all. We don't. Not at all, my friends. We never delude ourselves nor anybody else. But it is primarily, we think the odds objectively are even, because we really mean business in this most crucial fight of all human history as we always have. We believe it is possible for us to continue expanding our total program until it does measure up to the practical need before the hour is too late. And that even if the conspirators sensing and fearing this possibility should have some of us meet with fatal accidents or start unleashing against the society more vicious falsehoods than ever before, we are still prepared. Our total undertaking now has the organization, the experience, the courage, and the willpower to use our growing strength to best advantage, to act as a catalyst and a rallying point for the patriotic uprising that is now underway, and thus to play a decisive part in helping to save our country, and hence our whole civilization, from the living death that is called communism. Section c, which is the last of the three sections in this. So what must we do to be saved? Having thus used two thirds of our time on the background of this speech, let us now use the other third on the substance that will justify its title. So we first answer our question in the words of St. Augustine, We must pray as if it were all up to God, but work as if it were all up to us. And fundamentally, our own work, of course, must be exactly what we have already been doing. Only a great deal more of it with more people to help us. But the major purpose of this whole effort tonight is to add a powerful new concept to our understanding and our aims. To make that concept clear, we must creep up on it through a few brief items of history out of a thousand details we should like to offer for strengthening our point. So we skip many volumes and begin with one most significant fact. There was absolutely no reason on earth for the American people, or any other people for that matter, to become involved in World War I. The whole horrible conflict was deliberately plotted and brought about by insiders of the master conspiracy through their working in and on the governments of both sides with loyalty to none. Their objective was to create the ways and means through which the war could be used to advance the communist movement. The insiders' three major goals in this respect with regard to World War I were: a, to overthrow the government of Russia and enable the Communists to establish there a first physical base of Communist power b, to drag The United States into this kind of totalitarian foreign war with all the changes in the structure of our government and the outlook of our people that the war would make possible and c, to give birth to the embryo of their future world government in the form of the League of Nations. The first two items on that profoundly evil agenda came off according to design, and it is hard to tell which was most important to the conspirators. For from our entry into World War I, there was a prompt beginning, and thereafter a gradual development over the next twenty five years, of the role of The United States as a food supplier, equipment manufacturer, prestige builder, financial angel, ideological disciple, general benefactor, wartime ally, military arsenal, and vicious hatchet man for the Soviet communists. Until by the end of World War II, the United States Government had clearly become the most powerful single force in promoting the rise of communist power all over the world. Most of this was exactly in line with what the insiders in The United States and elsewhere had plotted and expected. So naturally they had used many waves of deceptive propaganda with much diplomatic trickery by their tools and all the governments involved, and every act of cold blooded murder or vicious treason to their respective countries which Woodrow Wilson and Winston Churchill together could devise in order to involve us in World War I and its aftermath at Versailles. But in typical communist fashion, as a means of continuing and increasing our involvement in world affairs, the insiders also invented a semantic weapon with which to smear and ridicule and discredit all Americans who were sensible enough to oppose their sinister plans. The basic term of this ideological tool was isolationism. Over the next few decades, the insiders made it into a verbal bludgeon of tremendous force, for World War II was plotted, contrived, and utilized by the same conspiracy for the very same purposes as World War I, plus many other purposes as well as the same ones. Franklin Roosevelt and George Marshall, also aided every step of the way by Winston Churchill, even produced some improvements on the lies and treason and ruthlessness of Wilson and House in order to drag us into this new international mill strong. And by this time, even prominent Americans this is by getting into World War II Even prominent Americans of unquestionable patriotism quailed before the prospect of being called isolationists. Until by the decades after that war, the now communist dominated American government had tens of thousands of bureaucrats, millions of American soldiers, and billions of American dollars scattered all over the world. This was for no other possible real reason than to help the communists to impose their brutal tyranny on an average of 7,000 more newly enslaved human beings somewhere in the world every hour of every day throughout every year. Every lying pretense or diplomatic skullduggery imaginable, as well as every foul misuse conceivable of American money and military might, was being utilized on an enormous scale for that purpose by our communist controlled State Department. And the surest way to discredit all critics of this rampant treason must to vilify them as isolationists. But the time has come at last when it is both wise and possible to identify this brazen fraud as one of the most blatant big lies in the whole realm of communist propaganda. So brush the insider's dust out of your eyes, my friends, and the commonest soap suds out of your brain, and ask yourselves in all honesty, what on earth is wrong with The United States simply minding its own business? Are with having its foreign policy function primarily for the safety and benefit of the American people. Which is exactly what we had done for the first hundred and forty years of our existence as a nation to the incredible advantage of ourselves and everybody else. Everybody that is, except a numerically small clique of powerlusting conspirators who had somehow inflicted themselves on a gullible world. We do not have to pull into our shell by any means. Certainly we had never done so when Yankee Clippers sailed the seven seas or when American automobiles first began to put the whole world on wheels. The United States should be glad to maintain the comfortable minimum of diplomatic relations with every civilized nation as we always were. Our people should certainly be glad to exchange commercial goods, cultural productions, and happy visits with the people of all nations as we always have been. But we should remember Richard Cobden's famous warning that real peace and happiness will come to this earth when the peoples of different countries have as much as much to do with each other as possible and their governments as little as possible. And we should also remember that the continuous colossal meddling of our government with the affairs of other governments all over the world does unmeasurable damage to the people under those other governments and to our own people as well. Let's get back on the road to greatness which we followed with such confidence and success during our first four generations as an independent nation. Then, standing on our own feet, let's once again become an envied example for all the world by our productiveness, our inventiveness, our individual rights and freedoms and opportunities, by our sense of responsibility, our compassion for the unfortunate, our basic moral codes, and our noble aspirations, and by our determination to preserve the wonderful inheritance which our founding fathers bequeathed to us for our own descendants and as an asylum for all worthy people who suffer under tyranny through no fault of their own. If this were the ambition of this humane course be dubbed isolationism, then let's take pride in being called isolationists. Above all, let's not be prevented from using our common sense, from leading patriotic lives and standing on our god given rights through fear of a tricky phrase invented for that very purpose by the most vile and merciless criminals in all human history. Section d, I thought I'd combine this in section c when I said it was the last, but I noticed I split it. And I do remember now, I did find a split it. But anyway, it's the last half of the last section, so let me encourage you. Section d, in conclusion. In fact, if your speaker were a young man of 50 and a politician, of which goodness knows he is neither, he would start running for president in 1976 on an isolationist platform. And the internationalist insiders might be amazed at how many millions of Americans would come surging to his support. So we offer the idea free to any qualified person who wants it while we turn to a very brief summarization of what we hope the John Birch Society will help and even sometimes lead the American people to accomplish during the next fifteen years. One, our first and most important specific undertaking should be to restore the complete independence of The United States. This includes our resolution to get us out of the United Nations and get the United Nations out of The United States. Two, we must once again make our money freely redeemable in gold at some realistic price. And we must take all practicable legislative steps to prevent a recurrence of the enormous thievery and other subversive crimes that have been perpetrated on the American people through a contrived inflation by every president from Franklin Roosevelt through Richard Nixon. Three. Three. We should reduce the number of government bureaus, of government civilian employees, and the whole quantity of government by at least 50%. And we should achieve at least this much reduction in proper fashion through gradually convincing a majority of the American people of the wisdom of such a course. Four, we should withdraw all American troops from every spot on earth that is not American soil except when and where such troops may be required as decided by Congress to protect American lives and property from criminal vandalism. Five, we should get government out of the areas and functions and activities where government does not belong. Again, again, all steps to this end should be taken gradually, but nevertheless just as rapidly as enough of the American people can be persuaded to support such progress. Any such achievement will require a truly massive educational force, but that's exactly what we hope to build during the next fifteen years. We could go ahead for at least a 100 numbered items, but the John Birch Society will undoubtedly be working on more than that many specific projects which will be laid out in its bulletins before another hundred and eighty months will have rolled around. And all of them will fit into all of these projects will fit into the general pattern indicated by the five major objectives listed above. So let's really wind up this marathon monologue with one final thought. None of us can guarantee anything about what the future will bring. Your speaker knows what a job we have before us to rid our country of the scourge of communism within the next few years and then to go ahead on our constructive program so well that fifteen years from now, we shall already be entering an era of far less government, of a much sounder sense of responsibility, and, with God's help, of a better world. But I sincerely believe that it can be done, and this much I know. If every man and woman in this audience should leave here tonight feeling in his or her own mind and heart that it can and must be done, then it surely will be. And so, all of you patriots of good character, good conscience, and noble ideals whom we can reach with the filmed version of this speech in a thousand other audiences, it is with a great deal of confidence and energizing will to win that we invite you to join us in our epic undertaking. To all of you great, wonderful friends in this present audience, I certainly extend my very deep thanks indeed for so much patience and attention. Thank you, and good night.
C_3C_3
Posted - March 17, 2026 at 7:12 PM
Saved - March 18, 2026 at 8:08 PM

@C_3C_3 - C3

There it is. John Thune is a snake. He knows there will never be 60 votes to pass the SAVE America Act. Itll be tough to get 51 with VP Vance but he’s going to do a worthless vote with NO talking filibuster. Pure show. The Benedict Arnold of his time. https://t.co/GXKYKx57LL

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 discusses the likelihood of achieving 60 votes and questions whether the situation is merely a show. He acknowledges uncertainty, noting, “We don't know that we don't have 60 votes yet,” and counters the assumption that there aren’t even 51 votes by saying, “Multiple members of your conference say that there aren't even 51 votes.” He cautions against assuming Democrats won’t be won over, stating, “you're making an assumption that at the end of this debate that none of the Democrats will be won over,” but he also concedes the possibility that none will be won over. Despite the uncertainty, he argues that the debate on the floor of the Senate is important and that the issue is at the core of elections in the United States. He asserts that the American people care about this issue and that constituents have raised it frequently, making it a significant topic to discuss publicly. He believes it is important to have the fight and the debate, regardless of how it ends. A central point he emphasizes is the defense of the position requiring citizenship to participate in voting processes. He states, “at the end of the day, I just don't know how you defend a position that you need to be a citizen in this country, not only to register a vote, but also to be able to show an ID when you vote.” He wonders how long Democrats will defend that position and reiterates the possibility that none of them will be won over. Nevertheless, he reiterates the value of the Senate floor debate, indicating that the process itself is important.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In debate on this. That means 60 votes. We don't have 60 votes. Why go through this? Is this basically just a show? Well, I mean, we don't know that we don't have 60 votes yet. You're making an assumption. Multiple members of your conference say that there aren't even 51 votes. Yeah. Well, you're making an assumption that at the end of this debate that none of the Democrats will be won over. And I'm not I'm not saying that, I I appreciate your skepticism, but I think it's an important debate to have because it is an issue that is at the very core of, elections in this country. And I think this is something that the American people, care about, something that we've obviously heard a lot about from, constituents across this country, and I think it's an important debate to have. So whether how it ends remains to be seen. There will be a point at which it will end, and there will be a series of votes that come with that. And, but I'm I'm at the end of the day, I just don't know how you defend a position that you need to be a citizen in this country, not only to register a vote, but also to be able to show an ID when you vote. And, we'll see how long the Democrats wanna defend that position, and maybe maybe none of them will be won over at the end. That's entirely possible. But I think the the having the fight, having the debate, on the floor of the senate is important. We appreciate it.
amuse
Posted - March 18, 2026 at 1:35 PM
Saved - March 18, 2026 at 7:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read that Illinois Gov Pritzker outlined Project 2029, claiming Democrats will weaponize the DOJ to criminally prosecute Trump officials and use NGO civil suits to bankrupt Republicans through lawfare. They’re not hiding it—they’re announcing it. h/t @VigilantFox

@amuse - @amuse

WEAPONIZATION: Illinois Gov Pritzker just explained Project 2029. Democrats plan to criminally prosecute Trump officials through a weaponized DOJ and use NGO civil suits to bankrupt Republicans through lawfare. They are not hiding it. They are announcing it. h/t @VigilantFox

C_3C_3
Posted - March 18, 2026 at 11:07 AM
Saved - March 18, 2026 at 6:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note nationwide injunctions: 8y Reagan 12; 4y H. Bush 6; 8y Clinton 12; 8y W. Bush 6; 8y Obama 12; 4y Biden 14. 40 years: 62. 5y Trump: 96. Judicial Activism.

@C_3C_3 - C3

Roberts cries about hostility towards judges… Nationwide Injunctions: 8 years of Reagan: 12 4 years of H Bush: 6 8 year of Clinton: 12 8 years of W Bush: 6 8 years of Obama: 12 4 years of Biden: 14 40 years of previous Presidents: 62 5 years of Trump: 96 Judicial Activism.

C_3C_3
Posted - March 16, 2026 at 11:26 AM
Saved - March 16, 2026 at 3:53 PM

@C_3C_3 - C3

Follow along… Walz makes “Driver’s Licenses for All” law. No citizenship requirement. Illegals get driver’s licenses that match EXACTLY. Minnesota has same day voter registration requiring license. Illegals vote. Dems steal elections. Simple. https://t.co/AlYGdOxH53

Video Transcript AI Summary
The first speaker describes a scenario in which a person can obtain a driver’s license again because licenses are issued broadly to those who register to vote. If the individual’s Social Security number does not match, they are flagged, but as long as they present an ID (the driver’s license) and sign that they are eligible to vote, they can vote and are no longer flagged, remaining in the system. Mister Lanell then responds by clarifying the process. He says that for anyone presenting documentation to register to vote, that documentation serves as affirmation of their identity. He notes that the driver’s license has not been used as proof of citizenship for the purposes of registering to vote; rather, it affirms that the person is who they say they are. He adds that in any case where someone were to cast a ballot, if they were ineligible to vote, there are reports generated post-election for voters who are challenged. Counties run these reports to show the status of voters that had been updated due to having cast a ballot, and these reports can be reviewed and referred to the county attorney. The first speaker concludes by restating the original question and provides a direct answer: the answer is yes to their question.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the answer to my question is yes. Under that scenario, someone could they get their driver's license again because we give them to anybody here. They register to vote. It doesn't match with the Social Security number so they're flagged but they come in as long as they have an ID which is that driver's license and they sign that they're, you know, eligible to vote. They can vote and they're they're no longer flagged. They're on the system. Is that correct? Mister Lanell. Speaker 1: Madam chair, if I could add the and and maybe stepping back from those that are flagged as CID on the roster For anyone that's presenting documentation to register to vote, that is affirmation of their identity. The driver's license has not been used as proof of citizenship for the purposes of of registering to vote. It's it's affirming that they are who they they say they are. So in any of these cases where someone were to cast a ballot if they were ineligible to vote, there are also reports that are generated post election for voters that are challenged that counties will run to show status of voters that had been updated due to the fact that they've now cast a ballot that can be reviewed and referred to the county attorney. Speaker 0: Okay. So the answer is yes to my question.
antmillionsbot
Posted - March 15, 2026 at 12:12 PM
Saved - March 16, 2026 at 7:17 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see Saudi Arabia built a 1,200 km pipeline from the Persian Gulf to the Red Sea, bypassing Hormuz. Built in 1981, activated in 2026, it now moves about 7 million barrels a day. While the world worried about Hormuz, Iran threatened to choke supply, and this quiet project now looks like one of the smartest geopolitical energy moves.

@antmillionsbot - 🇨🇳 Wei Zhao 赵伟

SAUDI ARABIA SAW THIS SHIT COMING 45 YEARS AGO While the entire world panicked about the Strait of Hormuz, Saudi Arabia had a 1,200 km pipeline ready to go. From the Persian Gulf straight to the Red Sea. Bypassing Hormuz completely. Built in 1981. Activated in 2026. 7 million barrels a day flowing through the desert right now. Iran threatened to choke the world's oil. A quiet project from decades ago now looks like one of the smartest geopolitical energy moves ever.

nicksortor
Posted - March 14, 2026 at 7:38 PM
Saved - March 16, 2026 at 6:59 AM

@nicksortor - Nick Sortor

🚨 LMAO! Democrats are throwing a FIT as pro-gun activists are outside the Virginia State Capitol handing out free 30-ROUND AR-15 mags to folks, as the state government is about to BAN them THIS is what patriotism looks like right here 🇺🇸🔥 https://t.co/C9xf8SGb8j

Thefactsdude
Posted - March 15, 2026 at 5:21 AM
Saved - March 16, 2026 at 3:10 AM

@Thefactsdude - The Facts Dude 🤙🏽

JUST IN: Afroman drops a banger before the lawsuit against him goes to court Monday in Adams County, Ohio. Afroman just released “Batteram Hymns of the Police Whistle Blower” a day before the lawsuit heads to court. Adams County sheriffs are suing Joseph Foreman for defamation, invasion of privacy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress for featuring them in his music videos from the night they raided and vandalized his house and allegedly stole $400. In the new song and video, he calls the deputies out by name, packed with videos photos from the raid and some AI to make it comical. Pretty ballsy.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker repeatedly claims that AfroMan/Aphroman will reveal proof online and asserts a series of accusations about named individuals. Key points include: - Aphroman/AfroMan promises to deliver “proof” and says “My proof's on the Internet.” - Brian Newland is described as “a flag.” - William is accused of being a pedophile, with the claim “If I'm telling folks the truth, how come I have to go to trial?” - Newland is alleged to have sexted kids and to be stealing the speaker’s money. - Tasha Chamberlain is named as a confidential informant. - Roy Gabbard is claimed to be “the judge that signs fictitious warrant.” - The speaker asserts that “This whole situation is totally their fault” and includes the line “Don’t rape me. Don't get videoed and caught.” - Prosecutor David Kelly is claimed to have “turned the jelly when they fell.” - A person described as “Coward” allegedly ran to Arizona to avoid consequences; Kimmy supposedly tried to dodge the speaker; Rogers allegedly retired and “dipped like a rat leaving a sinking ship.” - The refrain “Afro man will bring it to you. Afro man is gonna do you. Afro man is gonna screw you. My proof's on the internet.” recurs multiple times. - The speaker addresses “All you crooked cops in the world,” urging them to stop before they are put in a song, and reiterates that “my proof's on the Internet.” - The closing line questions whether people will believe the claims: “You think they're gonna buy this shit, man?”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Aphroman will bring it to you. Aphroman is gonna do you. Aphroman is gonna screw you. My proof's on the Internet. Brian Newland is a flag. William is a pedophile. If I'm telling folks the truth, how come I have to go to trial? Newland sexting kids. That's true. Now he's stealing my money too. My proof's on the Internet. Afro man will bring it to you. Afro man is gonna do you. Afro man is gonna screw you. My proof's on the inner. Tasha Chamberlain is a confidential informant. Roy Gabbard is the judge that signs fictitious warrant. This whole situation is totally their fault. Don't rape me. Don't get videoed and caught. Afro man will bring it to you. Afro man is gonna do you. Afro man is gonna screw you. My proof's on the internet. Prosecutor David Kelly turned the jelly when they fell. Coward ran to Arizona so he wouldn't catch the hell. Kimmy tried to dodge us. Rogers tried to retire and dip like a rat leaving a sinking ship. Afro man will bring it to you. Afro man is gonna do you. Afro man is gonna screw you. My proof's on the internet. All you crooked cops in the world that's doing wrong, you better stop you crooked cop before I put you in a song. Make your family and your friends laugh out loud and sing along, my proof's on the Internet. Aphroman will bring it to you. Aphroman is gonna do you. You think they're gonna buy this shit, man? Oh.

@Thefactsdude - The Facts Dude 🤙🏽

NEW: Rapper Afroman is scheduled to stand trial in a civil lawsuit filed by seven Adams County (Ohio) Sheriff’s deputies.   The legal battle stems from a 2022 raid on Afroman's home, where officers were investigating alleged drug trafficking and kidnapping claims that resulted in no charges. Afroman used his own security footage from the raid to create music videos which mock the officers and the "botched" operation.  The officers allege that Afroman used their personas for commercial profit without authorization, causing them "humiliation, ridicule, mental distress, and loss of reputation". They are seeking damages of $25,000 per count.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In August 2022, Adams County deputies raided the home of Joseph Foreman, better known as the rapper AfroMan, with a search warrant tied to an investigation into possible drugs and kidnapping victims. AfroMan says they didn’t charge him with any crimes and didn’t find large amounts of marijuana or any narcotics, nor were kidnapping victims found. Despite no charges, the raid resulted in thousands of dollars seized in cash, which was later returned, though AfroMan says about $400 was never recovered. The raid also caused damage throughout his home, and he says the department told him it was not responsible for paying for the repairs. AfroMan recalls a deputy laughing and saying, “we’re not required to do that,” and describes the deputies as unapologetic. AfroMan used his own security footage from the raids in a music video to raise money to pay for the damages sustained to his home. He states, “I got freedom of speech, and then I used my personal life to write my music. I was gonna clean my room, but then I got up. Will you help me repair my gate? Will you help me repair my door? I’m singing about what actually happened to me.” Deputies who appear in the video are now suing the rapper for the damages caused by their faces being in the videos. In response, AfroMan filed a countersuit for the damages to his home, but Judge Jonathan Hines dismissed those charges in February, saying they were “dismissed with the click of a mouse in some little office somewhere without a hearing.” AfroMan argues that the lawsuit violates his free speech rights as an American and as a working artist in the United States. He emphasizes his role as a working rapper who raps for a living and pays taxes “to America with rap money,” describing raw materials as life experience that fuels his music. The overall narrative centers on a raid without charges, financial loss and home damage, the use of raid footage in a music video, subsequent lawsuits over appearance in the video, and legal battles framing free speech and artistic expression in the aftermath.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Should have freedom of speech. I should be allowed to sing about my life, and police officers that violate my home, steal my money should not be allowed to sue me. Speaker 1: In August 2022, Adams County deputies raided the home of Joseph Foreman, better known as the rapper AfroMan. They had a search warrant tied to an investigation into possible drugs and kidnapping victims. Speaker 0: They didn't charge me for any crimes. They didn't find no large amounts of marijuana or whatever narcotic they were saying. They didn't find any kidnapping victims. Speaker 1: Aframan was never charged with a crime after the raid. Deputies seized thousands of dollars in cash that was later returned, but Afroman says about $400 was never recovered. The raid also left damage throughout his home, and he says the department told him it was not responsible for paying for the repairs. Speaker 0: The guy started laughing and waddling his head. He goes, we're not required to do that. And they were unapologetic. Speaker 1: Afroman used his own security footage from the raids in a music video to make money to pay for the damages sustained to his home. Speaker 0: I got freedom of speech, and then I used my personal life to write my music. I was gonna clean my room, but then I got up. Will you help me repair my gate? Will you help me repair my door? I'm singing about what actually happened to me. Speaker 1: Deputies who appear in the video are now suing the rapper for the damages caused by their faces being in the videos. Speaker 0: Hey. We raid your house. We steal your money. We disconnect your cameras. Now we need to sue you for saying something about it. Speaker 1: Aframan filed a countersuit for the damages to his home, and judge Jonathan Hines dismissed those charges in February. Speaker 0: They dismissed all of my claims with the click of a mouse in some little office somewhere without a hearing. Speaker 1: Aframan believes this lawsuit violates his free speech rights as an American and as a working artist in The United States. Speaker 0: As a working rapper that raps for a living and pays taxes to America with rap money, I need raw materials. Raw materials is my life experience.
charise_lee
Posted - March 14, 2026 at 9:08 PM
Saved - March 15, 2026 at 5:39 PM

@charise_lee - Meidas_Charise Lee

The perfect analogy‼️ https://t.co/H0VStTADmO

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker uses a vivid analogy to explain betrayal and manipulation. He describes a movie-like scenario in which a wife brings home a baby she found and presents it as an innocent victim that the couple will adopt. A man arrives and gives you glasses, and once you put them on you see a cute baby. You become emotionally invested in this child, and the wife nurses and cares for it. Then you decide to remove the glasses to see clearly, but the man who gave you the glasses warns against it, insisting you leave the glasses on. When you finally take off the glasses, you discover the “baby” is a grown man inside your house, who has been “chewing on your wife,” cuddling with her, taking your money, and spending time on your couch with your wife. The glasses were the illusion that made you think it was an innocent baby to care for. The question becomes: who are you most mad at? The speaker outlines a sequence of blame and actions. The first action is to leave the house. He calls the “hairy guy” (the grown man) the first to go, to avoid further trouble. The second person to blame is the man who gave the glasses—the one who made it seem like an innocent victim and caused the speaker to be unwittingly complicit. The speaker emphasizes that this betrayer is the glasses-giver, the person who manipulated perception. Most importantly, the speaker says the betrayer is the wife. The wife is labeled the “betrayer” in this scenario, and the speaker insists that it is time for a divorce and a fresh start, with everyone leaving the house: first the hairy guy, then the man with the glasses, and finally the wife. The analogy is extended to real-world politics: the baby represents Israel or any donor class; the man with the glasses is the media that paints these entities as innocent victims in need of money or support. The wife represents politicians who are supposed to represent the people but are portrayed as betraying them. The speaker asserts that Israel has gained territory and other benefits by taking money from “us,” and that the wife-politicians have betrayed the public. At the end, the speaker promotes OperationConsequence.com as part of the desired fresh start. He emphasizes that the analogy could be extended for hours, suggesting a comprehensive critique of perceived manipulation by media, donors, and politicians.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tucker, let me give you one more analogy that clarifies that. Yes. So it's like a a movie where they tell you, hey. You know what? Your your wife came in with this baby that she found, and it's a victim, and you guys are gonna adopt it. And she's so golden hearted, and she brought the kid home. And you go, Okay, great. Let me see the kid. And a guy walks in and goes, Here, first I got to give you some glasses. Okay? And he gives you glasses, and you put them on, and you go, Oh my God, what a cute kid. I have no idea where this analogy is going, but I love it. Okay. Yeah. I'm totally wrapped up in it. Okay. Yeah. And your wife is nursing the kid and feeding it, etcetera. And then one day you go, I wonder what things look like without the glasses. And the guy who gave you the glasses goes, No, no, no, no. Don't take the glasses off. Don't take the glasses off. Now you're like, wait a minute. I really want to take the glasses off. Yeah. Right. And you take the glasses off and you find out the glasses were the illusion. It's not a baby. It's a grown man. Oh. And he's been inside your house the whole time. Chewing on your wife. Cuddling your wife. Oh, no. Taking your money. He's got like almost a half shirt on, big belly, know, hairy guy. He's sitting on your couch with your wife. Suckling. Suckling. It turns out the glasses were the thing that made you see it wrong and made it seem like it was an innocent victim, a little baby you were taking care of. Now you find out you got a grown man inside your house. Pawn on your wife and draining your checking account. Now the question is, who are you most mad at? Okay. I'm the least mad at the guy. First, though, the first action I'm going to take, even though I'm least mad at him, is you got to leave. You got to leave the house right now, otherwise something terrible is going The man child. Yes. The second on your wife. Yeah. I totally agree with that. Okay. First step is get the fuck out of my house. Okay? Second guy I'm mad at is the guy who gave me the glasses. What the fuck? You made it seem like it was an innocent victim and I was being a good guy by helping this entity. Okay? And now I find out, no, it was just someone taking advantage of me. Yes. And taking the person who was supposed to be closest to me that was supposed to have trust with me. Yes. And taking all my money, and you played me for a fool. I fucking hate the guy with the glasses. Right? But the person I'm most upset Is the betrayer. Is the betrayer. The wife in that case. It's an uncomfortable analogy. You could switch it to husband and wife. That's not the point. The point is, yes, if you don't get it by now, whether it's Israel or any really lobby, any donor class, that's the baby. The guy with the glasses is the media saying, oh, no, these poor little oil companies, they need your money. Look at it. It's a victim. Otherwise, they can't drill for oil. These drug companies, they've only made trillions. You can't let them negotiate prices. Right? Or it's Israel. Oh, it's an innocent victim of all the nasty Muslims and terrorists around them. And then you look at the map. Wait a minute. Israel has gained all this territory, and they've done it by taking 300,000,000,000 from us. But most importantly, the wife is the politicians. Yes. And they're supposed to represent us, and they have betrayed us. Okay? And I can't stand it. I can't stand it. It's time for a divorce. It's time for a divorce. So everyone's got to get out of the house. First, the hairy guy. You got to go. Okay? Otherwise, we're going to have trouble. Then the guy with the glasses, and then finally the wife. Everybody's got to go. We're going to get a fresh new start. Operationconsequences.com. Okay. I can't I literally could do this interview for ten hours and never improve on that analogy.
iluminatibot
Posted - March 14, 2026 at 8:55 PM
Saved - March 15, 2026 at 5:05 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

Before and after they sold their soul to Satan https://t.co/JGmMY4WuGL

WallStreetApes
Posted - March 15, 2026 at 1:30 PM
Saved - March 15, 2026 at 4:00 PM

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

This is genius A video was made in the style of Disney that explains Sharia Law This makes Islam and Sharia Law easy to understand for everyone of all ages https://t.co/sVf4NqkTFR

kittenaround_51
Posted - March 14, 2026 at 8:50 PM
Saved - March 15, 2026 at 3:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see residents unhappy with HOA leaders who were never voted in to be in charge. The leaders say their positions were handed down by previous members, which doesn’t sound legal to me.

@kittenaround_51 - Bobbi

Do you live in a neighborhood community that has an HOA? This meeting shows how the residents are not happy with those that are running things and whom were never voted in to be in charge. The leaders say their positions were given to them by previous members. That doesn't sound legal to me.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript captures a heated HOA meeting where a homeowner (Speaker 0) rails against the lack of ballots and proper elections for the board. Speaker 0 states, “Not one person in this area has gotten a ballot to vote anybody in. I have been here eight years,” and repeats that at no point has anybody received a ballot to vote for anyone. They urge consultation with “the attorney for the homeowners,” asserting that board members are to be voted in and have a one-year term, insisting, “Not at any point in time. Does anybody here Did you get a ballot to vote for anybody? No.” Speaker 0 demands to finish their point and asks others to stop interrupting. Speaker 1 attempts to clarify, and Speaker 0 challenges their authority, asking, “Are you an attorney?” Speaker 1 acknowledges involvement since day one and asserts, “Since day one of this association, there’s never been an election,” and reiterates, “No. An election.” Speaker 0 adds, “And with that being said,” while Speaker 2 interjects with a question about current actions. Speaker 0 contends that although there may not have been an election, the current group “chose to put yourself on the board,” and claims they will move to a joint meeting and end the matter, but is interrupted. Speaker 1 insists that the meeting is not the appropriate forum for this discussion, stating, “The meeting has started to address what it was here today,” and that it’s a separate meeting if a different discussion is desired. Speaker 0 pushes to proceed immediately. Speaker 2 offers historical context: “If there’s never been an election, there were some board members appointed in the very beginning. Raylon turned it over to a couple people. Then those people just decided … I’m gonna add you.” Speaker 0 emphasizes that by law, board members must be elected, not appointed, and questions the legitimacy of the current board’s authority. “By law, read your laws, go to an attorney. By law, you have to be voted in.” Speaker 1 responds, asking Priscilla what she wants to do, noting that there are four ex-board members in front of them and asking if they should be asked about their elections. Speaker 0 acknowledges they were elected previously but complains about being told they were appointed. They insist on sending out a ballot and state, “Ballot. You are welcome to put yourself up to be on the board,” while indicating that the current board claims there will be no election until April. Speaker 1 suggests that the proper process would involve a formal meeting with notice and decision, while Speaker 0 asserts the desire for the current board to step down, mentioning ongoing issues such as a $100,000 irrigation problem and unresolved bills. The exchange then pivots back to attempting to resume a formal meeting, with Speaker 1 declaring, “We’re back to the meeting we have today.” In sum, the speakers clash over whether elections have occurred, who appointed board members, the proper legal process for board selection, and the appropriate timing for any future elections, with requests to suspends the current board and to conduct formal ballots.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Not one person in this area has gotten a ballot to vote anybody in. I have been here eight years. Speaker 1: Wait a minute. Speaker 0: Let me finish. I let me finish, and then you guys can talk. Not at one point in time has anybody got a ballot here to vote you in. It's a one year. Check with the attorney. Check with the attorney for the homeowners. You are to be voted in. You have a one year term. Not at any point in time. Does anybody here Did you get a ballot to vote for anybody? No. Did you get a ballot? No. Nobody's got a a ballot to vote to say let me finish. We're letting you finish Stop interrupting her. Will you? Speaker 1: Would like to clarify something that might make it more understanding for you. I I do know. No. No. It may make it more understanding. Believe me. Speaker 0: Are you an attorney? Speaker 1: Since day one Oh, Speaker 0: we're a homeowner. Speaker 1: Since day listen to me. Since day one of this association, there's never been an election. Speaker 0: And you guys are not do Speaker 1: No. An election. Speaker 0: And with that being said Speaker 2: Are they doing up there? Speaker 0: At any point in time, yes, there may not have been an election, but you guys chose to put yourself on the board. You let me finish. You guys chose to put yourself one minute and we're going to a Speaker 1: joint meeting and it's over. No. You're Speaker 0: not a valid board. You have no right. You are green. He has spoken. That's Speaker 1: No. We're not. The meeting has started to address what it was here today. That's a separate meeting. If you wanna have that, we're more than happy to have a meeting. It's not here today. Speaker 0: We're here now, so let's get it. Speaker 1: It's not here today. We got That's not that meeting. Yes. We do. Speaker 2: Okay. May I say something? If there's never been an an election, there were some board members appointed in the very beginning. Raylon turned it over to a couple people. Then those people just decided, oh, I'm gonna add you. I'm gonna add you. So they have been appointed by board members, and that is the history of But Speaker 0: a board member, by law, read your laws, go to an attorney. By law, you have to be voted in. It doesn't Priscilla, what do Speaker 2: you wanna do? Speaker 1: Priscilla, what do you wanna do? There's four people sitting in front of you that are ex board members. Would you like to ask them if they were elected? Speaker 0: We know there were elected, Speaker 1: but then don't say don't say to us. Don't say to us. We were appointed by the vote. Shut up, do you? Speaker 0: Send out a ballot. It. We're done. Ballot. You are welcome to put yourself up to be on the board. Speaker 1: You are anyone else Speaker 0: to vote. But by what right do you sit there and say we're not having an election till April? Speaker 1: You don't my laws call for. Speaker 0: No. An annual No. First of After the first of the year, not April. Speaker 1: Okay. We'll go Speaker 2: to birth here. Whenever you you Speaker 0: guys want us to do it. Wait. The only thing What we'd like is for you guys to just stop being the board. Speaker 2: Well, here's Oh, what Speaker 0: no. You're clinging on to that. Speaker 2: Donna, if you have a problem with the board I do. Okay. Then you need to get a get a meeting together, give everybody thirty day notice, and take care of it. Speaker 1: Throw us all off. You can have the $100,000 irrigation problem. You can take care of the bills. You can do all the rest of it. Speaker 0: I'm sure that it Speaker 1: we can't We're back to our meeting. This meeting is back in seconds. No more discussion. We're back to the meeting we have today. Now First thing on the agenda
TheBritLad
Posted - March 14, 2026 at 12:50 AM
Saved - March 14, 2026 at 3:54 PM

@TheBritLad - The British Patriot

🚨BREAKING: Huge police presence in Hammersmith, London. Muslims have surrounded a Sikh family restaurant for refusing to sell halal food. The family have received both death and rape threats for refusing to bend the knee to Muslims. This is Sadiq Khans London. https://t.co/8oTP4T0Xgj

VoicesUnheard
Posted - March 12, 2026 at 7:25 PM
Saved - March 13, 2026 at 6:11 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m hearing mothers document their birth to have someone they trust in the room. Police were called to remove a doula during labor, first claimed as law, then policy, then “her rules.” The mother labored alone. Across posts, people argue a support person is safety and reduces vulnerability, while policy debates and consent fights continue. The core message: mothers deserve chosen, trusted presence in delivery.

@VoicesUnheard - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

Six police officers were called to a maternity ward. Not for violence. Not for a crime. But to remove a birth doula while her client was in labor. Staff first claimed it was “the law.” Then suddenly it became “hospital policy.” The nurse even said “stop recording.” The mother was left to labor alone. More women are starting to speak up and document what happens during birth. They’re simply trying to make themselves safer, calmer, and supported by having someone they trust in the room. Some hospitals don’t seem to like that. Wonder why? 🤔

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes their doula team’s situation during a birth: the husband has left with the baby because the baby, Lisa, was asked to leave, leaving the mother to give birth alone in the room. Speaker 1 confirms they are supporting a doula client who desires their presence. Speaker 2 then informs them that the nurses are asking them to leave, citing visitation privilege and requesting the policy on visitation. Speaker 0 asks whether this decision is being made before considering the impact on care. Speaker 2 reiterates that visitation privileges could conflict with care, and implies that once competing with care arises, the nurses’ concern becomes an issue. Speaker 1 questions how their presence impedes care. Speaker 2 declines to elaborate, stating that it’s about visitation grounds. Speaker 0 notes that the mother will be alone in the room as a result, since the husband left with the baby. Speaker 1 expresses confusion over the nurse’s stance, stating they have made no medical interference and are simply present to support and assist with hip squeezes, not to intervene medically. Speaker 0 says they have been making their own consent and decisions, and that the mother has no one else with her. Speaker 1 asserts that the nurses’ grounds to remove them are unfounded, and emphasizes that the mother can speak for herself; they are not speaking for her. The overall tension centers on whether the doulas’ presence constitutes medical interference or is a permissible support under visitation policies, with the mother at risk of being alone during childbirth.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Her husband's gone with the baby because they asked the baby Lisa. She'll be here giving birth all by herself. Speaker 1: Our doula client who we are supporting is desiring to have us here. Speaker 2: From the nurses, I'm gonna ask you both to leave. Speaker 1: Under what grounds are you asking? Speaker 2: Visitation visitation privilege. So her husband get the the the policy on the visitation Speaker 0: Before you make that decision Speaker 2: competing with care and the nurses, then it becomes an issue. Speaker 1: How are we impeding with her care? Speaker 2: I I I'm not gonna get into that. That's what we're Speaker 0: gonna So she's five so her husband's gone with the baby because they asked the baby to leave. So she'll be here giving birth all by herself. He had to leave with his daughter. Mhmm. So that means she's gonna be in this room all by herself. Speaker 2: One of you are both of you Speaker 1: Because she requires She's requesting our work. We're not medically interfering. We're literally sitting here. Word. But because we're sitting here now, all of a sudden, we're medically interfering and we have to leave Yes. Speaker 2: That's my understanding. Speaker 0: But she has no one Speaker 1: How is that understanding? Speaker 0: The nurse is right there. I've been making Speaker 1: my own decisions then, making my own consent. Wait. What We have done nothing. Speaker 0: She has a mouth. We're just here to support her giving her hip squeeze, and she's gonna be in this room by herself. Speaker 1: We are not speaking for her. Speaker 0: She's gonna be in this room by herself to give birth. Speaker 1: She can speak for herself. They have no grounds to put us out of this room. Not at all.

@VoicesUnheard - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

Women are taking their power back during birth. Why would anyone object to a mother having support in the room?

@VoicesUnheard - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

PART 1 👇 Patient: “I can decide who I want in the delivery room?” Nurse: “No. The doctor wants everyone out.” First they say it’s the law. Then it becomes policy. The support person present is the one recording. https://t.co/hllZCEw0bs

@VoicesUnheard - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

@ourptrights @AbigailIovine That’s awesome - thanks for sharing! Next time I’ll try to remember to tag you in stories like this. 🙏💖 You’re doing a great service for patient consent. 👏

@VoicesUnheard - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

@rachelforgov It's sad our minds go there, but I've heard enough personal stories to know a patient alone isn't just vulnerable, it's unsafe. Everyone needs a support person in the hospital.

@VoicesUnheard - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

@antipsychosoup Unfortunately true. Hospitals are changing policies as moms and dads become more aware and vocal - and it’s doing nothing to rebuild trust. If anything, it’s making it worse.

@VoicesUnheard - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

@ShariseParviz That's a good question 🤔 let me see if I can find out. I wouldn't be surprised...

@VoicesUnheard - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

@LegalFockery That’s what makes this video so shocking. The mom literally asks, ‘Can’t I have whoever I want in the delivery room?’ and they tell her NO.

@VoicesUnheard - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

@mollistan Right? A woman in labor shouldn’t have to battle the hospital just to feel safe and supported.

@VoicesUnheard - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

@Brono921 It’s literally on video. First they say it’s the ‘law,’ then it turns into ‘policy,’ and then the nurse says the doctor doesn’t want anyone else in the room because ‘it’s her rules.’ The support person in the room is the one recording. I’ll post Part 1 too.

@VoicesUnheard - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

@SuesEyeView Yes! Especially if you're having a healthy pregnancy 🙏

@VoicesUnheard - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

@powerofthetime Correct. Never let your baby out of your sight. Some parents only found out later, when reviewing medical records, that their newborn was injected after they had already said NO.

@VoicesUnheard - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

@OlaussenEdel They really don’t like it when a birthing mom knows her rights and has support in the room. It makes her far less vulnerable.

@VoicesUnheard - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

@RGBG01 Yes, I always say - if you’re having a healthy pregnancy, consider a home birth with a qualified midwife, a doula, even nurses who’ve left the hospital system to support moms at home. 🙏

PatAdams96
Posted - March 12, 2026 at 2:31 PM
Saved - March 13, 2026 at 12:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note that Americans’ trust in legacy media is at an all-time low. Karoline cites the 2005 bipartisan report by the Commission on Federal Election Reform, chaired by Jimmy Carter, saying absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud— echoed by those calling AP’s fact check “absurd.” Both posts urge passage of the Save America Act to address mail-in voting vulnerabilities.

@PatAdams96 - Pat Adams

This is a *perfect* example of why Americans’ trust in the legacy media is at an all-time low. Karoline stated an indisputable fact during a White House press briefing about former President Jimmy Carter previously warning about the potential fraud concerns surrounding universal mail-in-voting. @PressSec: “The bipartisan 2005 report of the Commission on Federal Election Reform… chaired by, of all people, former President Jimmy Carter… said ‘absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud.’” That is a direct quote from the 2005 report. @AP’s Absurd Fact Check: “The Trump administration is falsely claiming Jimmy Carter was against mail-in voting.” The media peddles these garbage “fact checks” to try to discredit anything that undermines the Democrats’ narrative.

@PatAdams96 - Pat Adams

https://t.co/dmzs9yRNEf

@RapidResponse47 - Rapid Response 47

.@PressSec: PASS THE SAVE AMERICA ACT! https://t.co/vXVqKhILT8

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: President Trump is urging Congress to pass the Save America Act, describing it as one of the most critical pieces of legislation in our nation's history. He asserts the Save America Act is overwhelmingly popular with all Americans because each provision is rooted in common sense, and outlines five simple requirements as requested by the president of the United States. 1) Voters have to show ID to cast a ballot in an American election. He states this is very simple and notes that 90% of Americans, including more than 80% of Democrat voters, agree with this. 2) The Save America Act will require all voters to show proof of citizenship in order to register to vote. He asserts this is popular and rooted in common sense, insisting that only American citizens have the right to vote in American elections. He claims that after Joe Biden and the Democrats allowed tens of millions of illegal aliens into the country, it is more important than ever to ensure that only American citizens are registering to vote on our nation's voter rolls, and he calls on Congress to pass this. 3) The Save America Act abolishes the incongruously unsecure practice of universal mail-in ballots, which he says "throw the door wide open for fraud." He notes that the act maintains exceptions for Americans to use mail-in ballots for illness, disability, military, or travel reasons. He references the bipartisan 2005 report of the Commission on Federal Election Reform, chaired by former president Jimmy Carter and former secretary of state James Baker, which concluded that absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud and that Congress should address this. 4) The Save America Act permanently bans men from competing in women's sports. He notes that President Trump signed a landmark executive order upholding the promise of Title IX and ending this practice, and argues that now it’s time for Congress to codify this into law. 5) The Save America Act bans transgender mutilation surgery for children. He states that the president signed a common-sense executive order to do this and kept his promise to the American people, but now Congress needs to codify it. He asserts it is well past time for Democrats in Congress to stop perpetuating the radical and false claim that you can somehow change a child's sex, stating that you cannot. He concludes by saying passing the Save America Act is the most important thing Republicans—and frankly Democrats—can do to strengthen election integrity and protect democracy. He asserts it is what the American people elected Republicans to do and that they must deliver on it as soon as possible. The president calls on Congress to get the job done and send this historic piece of legislation to his desk immediately for signature.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: President Trump is urging congress to pass the Save America Act, one of the most critical pieces of legislation in our nation's history. The Save America Act is overwhelmingly popular with all Americans because each provision is rooted in common sense. The Save America Act has five simple requirements as requested by the president of The United States. Number one, voters have to show ID to cast a ballot in an American election. Very simple. 90% of Americans, including more than 80% of Democrat voters, agree with this. Number two, the Save America Act will require all voters to show proof of citizenship in order to register to vote elections. Again, this is popular and rooted in common sense. Only American citizens have the right to vote in American elections. But after Joe Biden and the Democrats allowed tens of millions of illegal aliens into our country, it's more important than ever to ensure that only American citizens are registering to vote in our on our nation's voter rolls, and congress needs to pass this. Number three, the Save America Act abolishes the incredibly unsecure practice of universal mail in ballots, which throw the door wide open for fraud. Importantly, the save America act maintains exceptions for Americans to use mail in ballots like ill for illness, disability, military, or travel reasons. The bipartisan 2005 report of the Commission on Federal Election Reform chaired by, of all people, former president Jimmy Carter and former secretary of state James Baker concluded that, quote, absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud, and it is time for congress to finally address this. Number four, the Save America Act permanently bans men from competing in women's sports. President Trump signed a landmark executive order upholding the promise of title nine and ending this dangerous and unfair practice. But now it's time for congress to codify this into law. Number five, the save America act bans transgender mutilation mutilation surgery for children. Again, president Trump signed a common sense executive order to do this and kept his promise to the American people, but now congress needs to do the same and codify it. It's well past time for democrats in congress to stop perpetuating the radical and false claim that you can somehow change a child's sex. You cannot. Passing the Save America Act is the most important thing that republicans and frankly democrats can do to strengthen election integrity and protect our democracy. It's what the American people elected Republicans to do and they must deliver on it as soon as possible. The president is calling on Congress to get the job done and send this historic piece of legislation to his desk immediately for signature.

@PatAdams96 - Pat Adams

https://t.co/zJB56QTvRI

@RapidResponse47 - Rapid Response 47

The very same Commission: "Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud" and are "vulnerable to abuse in several ways." PASS THE SAVE AMERICA ACT! https://t.co/TG10OA2CSC

@RapidResponse47 - Rapid Response 47

The bipartisan Commission on Federal Election Reform, which was co-chaired by President Jimmy Carter: "Photo IDs currently are needed to board a plane, enter federal buildings, and cash a check. Voting is equally important." PASS THE SAVE AMERICA ACT!

Sassafrass_84
Posted - March 12, 2026 at 9:53 PM
Saved - March 13, 2026 at 12:40 AM

@Sassafrass_84 - Sassafrass84

Know your history. Democrats are not the good guys. And never will be. https://t.co/WtylMXz08x

thematrixb0t
Posted - March 12, 2026 at 11:00 AM
Saved - March 13, 2026 at 12:29 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The discussion centers on claims about the FDA’s funding from pharma. An official report counters the rumor, stating 47% of funding comes from Big Pharma. A commenter asks for a reliable article to verify the claim.

@thematrixb0t - matrixbot

The FDA has been the victim of a rumor that 50% of their funding comes from the pharmaceutical industry. In response they’ve released an official report of their funding to prove that actually only 47% of their funding comes from Big Pharma https://t.co/5ADB0zJVVb

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the claim that the FDA receives 47% of its funding from the pharmaceutical industry, noting that the agency released this figure only after a rumor that 50% of their funding came from pharma. They point out a perceived conflict of interest, suggesting that the people writing rules and regulations are funded by the same entities being regulated. The speaker shares personal health concerns and notes difficulty finding valid information not paid for by big pharma. They state that 85 to 90 percent of women with similar issues experience changes or relief in symptoms simply by changing their diet, specifically by going gluten-free, though the speaker personally is not inclined to go gluten-free. Instead, they mention cutting out refined carbs and sugars and report feeling a ton different after only two days on this diet. They express excitement about sharing the journey with viewers. The speaker mentions reassembling a squat rack for a home gym and acquiring egg-laying birds, describing these actions as part of a broader stance against big pharma. They reiterate disbelief that 47% of FDA funding comes from the pharmaceutical industry and declare “a big to big pharma.” The speaker invites audience thoughts and feedback on the topics discussed.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Does anyone wanna talk about the fact that the FDA gets 47% of its funding from the pharmaceutical industry? 47%. And they only released this information because there was a rumor that 50% of their funding came from the pharmaceutical industry. So they came out and said, no. Actually, it's only 47%. So think about that. The people that you're supposed to be making rules and regulations for are the same people that are paying you money. Seems like a conflict of interest. No? So I've been having a few health issues and I realized in researching which has been really difficult to actually find valid information that isn't paid for by big pharma, eighty five to ninety percent of the women who experience the same issues that I experience notice changes in their symptoms or alleviation completely from their symptoms simply by changing their diet, namely going gluten free. Now I personally am not one to do that, but I am cutting out refined carbs and sugars from my diet. I've been on this diet for two days now, and I already feel a ton different. Just kinda makes you wonder, but I'm excited to be bringing you guys along for this whole journey. We're putting up our squat rack again in our home gym. We did get some egg laying birds, and we're just basically saying a big to big pharma. I still can't believe it's 47% of their funding, and they think that's okay. Anyway, as always, I look forward to hearing your thoughts about all of this down below.

@KCDVM - Dr.WeimCrime

@thematrixb0t @Grok is this true and can you provide a reliable article on the subject?

NathanielSami
Posted - March 11, 2026 at 1:41 AM
Saved - March 12, 2026 at 5:59 AM

@NathanielSami - Sami Nathaniel

Keep it up Senator Kennedy! You are fighting the good fight.!!! https://t.co/A0RBhAXaCP

Video Transcript AI Summary
The exchange centers on accusations of hyperbolic statements and the accuracy of quoted posts. Speaker 0 challenges Speaker 1's credibility, citing a series of posts and asking whether the statements were read correctly. - On 02/11/2026, Speaker 0 cites a Blueski post: “my words or your words, not mine. The democrats video telling service members to ignore illegal orders didn't go far enough. They should have also urged them to refuse unethical orders, whether illegal or not. There are many things deemed legal that are still obviously unethical, and everyone should hold themselves to this higher law,” and asks, “Did I read that correctly?” Speaker 1 confirms reading it and asks if Speaker 0 disagrees with it, questioning whether people should do unethical things in their capacity of [unknown context]. - On 12/31/2025, Speaker 0 references a post reading, “in front of god and country. … They referring to Republicans think they control their way into us accepting ethnic cleansing,” and asks, “Did I read that correctly?” Speaker 1 responds that it related to a DHS security post advocating a 100,000,000 deportations, stating that “A 100,000,000 deportations would be ethnic cleansing,” adding, “You would be True. One third of the country. So, yes, there are people within the Department of Homeland security.” Speaker 0 asks whether this is hyperbolic and requests more time. - On 02/05 (implied), Speaker 1 notes, “advocating a 100,000,000” but the sentence is cut off in the transcript. Speaker 0 comments, “reputations is … cleansing,” while continuing to engage in the discussion with the chair and audience; Speaker 0 asks for thirty more seconds. - On 03/02, Speaker 0 quotes Speaker 1: “if you rule against Trump's population purge agenda, no hyper permanently there, the nativists will name you, threaten you, and come after you. These judges are much braver than the ICE agents who hide behind masks while violating the constitution. They are much braver.” Speaker 1 clarifies, “They put their names on their rulings, and they stand behind their constitutional rulings. When I talk about population purge, I'm talking about the fact that they're trying to deport US born citizens, people born here. They are trying to deport them as well. So it's not a mass deportation agenda. It is also an agenda intended to reduce the population of The United States, including US born people.” - Speaker 0 responds, “Thank you.” Speaker 1 adds, “These are not hyperbolic statements. I appreciate you reading my account. Here's the good news.” The conversation escalates in tone as Speaker 0 interjects with disbelief, asking, “What planet … parachute him from?” Speaker 1 replies, “No. No.” Speaker 0 comments, “Hey, guys. You're you you You trigger my gag reflex,” and Speaker 1 closes with, “Mr. Bieber.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Don't you think your hyperbolic statements undermine your credibility? Speaker 1: What hyperbolic statement did I make? Speaker 0: On 02/11/2026, you posted on Blueski, quote, my words or your words, not mine. The democrats video telling service members to ignore illegal orders didn't go far enough. They should have also urged them to refuse unethical orders, whether illegal or not. There are many things deemed legal that are still obviously unethical, and everyone should hold themselves to this higher law, end quote. Did I read that correctly? Speaker 1: I believe you did. Do you disagree with it? You think people should do unethical things in their capacity of Speaker 0: 12/31/2025. You posted to in front But wait. Wait. Do you disagree with what I finish my question. You answered, sir. Sure. In front of god and country. You said, quote, they referring to Republicans think they control their way into us accepting ethnic cleansing, end quote. Your your words not mine. Did I read that correctly? Speaker 1: That was in regard to a Did did I read that? Security post about advocating a 100,000,000 deportations. That is what DHS has tweeted from their own account. A 100,000,000 deportations would be ethnic cleansing. You would be True. One third of the country. So, yes, there are people within the Department of Homeland homeland security. Speaker 0: Don't think this is hyperbolic? Give me thirty more seconds. Speaker 1: I think advocating a 100,000,000 Speaker 0: reputations is I'm having fun here, mister chairman. Cleansing. On February 5, you you you quoted the you said the following on Blueski. Your your time These is are all good, but there's no enforcement mechanism. I'm sorry. Let me try a better one. On March 2, you said, quote, if you rule against Trump's population purge agenda, no hyper permanently there, the nativists will name you, threaten you, and come after you. These judges are much braver than the ICE agents who hide behind masks while violating the constitution. They are much braver. Speaker 1: They put their names on their rulings, and they stand behind their their constitutional rulings. When I talk about population purge, I'm talking about the fact that they're trying to deport US born citizens, people born here. They are trying to deport them as well. So it's not a mass deportation agenda. It is also an agenda intended to reduce the population of The United States, including US born people. Speaker 0: Thank you. Speaker 1: These are not hyperbolic statements. I appreciate you reading my my account. I I appreciate Here's the good news. Speaker 0: What planet Wait a minute. Minute, mister chairman. What planet did you just parachute him from? Speaker 1: No. No. Speaker 0: Hey, guys. You're you you You trigger my gag reflex, Speaker 1: Mr. Bieber.
thematrixb0t
Posted - March 11, 2026 at 12:00 PM
Saved - March 11, 2026 at 6:18 PM

@thematrixb0t - matrixbot

BOEBERT: "Implant aborted baby parts into lab animals? Have you heard of that sort of research?" GOODMAN: "We did an analysis showing that over 90% of experiments using human fetal tissue & putting them in animals were funded by Fauci's NIAID." https://t.co/QLF6WISHGT

Video Transcript AI Summary
First speaker: Implant aborted baby parts into lab animals. You heard of that sort of research? Second speaker: We did an analysis a few years ago showing that over ninety percent of experiments with using human fetal tissue and putting them involved animals were funded by Fauci's NIAID. First speaker: Do you know where they're getting the aborted human fetal tissue? Second speaker: A lot of it is happening at colleges and universities that have affiliated hospitals that perform that procedure. First speaker: Madam Chair, I think Second speaker: we First speaker: need to look into that as well.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Implant aborted baby parts into lab animals. You heard of that sort of research? Speaker 1: Yeah. We did an analysis a few years ago showing that over ninety percent of experiments with using human fetal tissue and putting them involved animals were funded by Fauci's NIAID. Speaker 0: Do you know where they're getting the aborted human fetal tissue? Speaker 1: A lot of it is happening at colleges and universities that have affiliated hospitals that perform that procedure. Speaker 0: Madam Chair, I think Speaker 1: we Speaker 0: need to look into that as well.
DataRepublican
Posted - March 10, 2026 at 2:12 PM
Saved - March 10, 2026 at 3:16 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The thread claims PunchbowlNews sponsors also funded Senator Thune, totaling about $1.2M, while noting the main backers are $3/month subscribers. It catalogs sponsors and amounts (Goldman Sachs $150k; Comcast/NBCU $120k; Chevron $111k; Merck $100k; Wells Fargo $90k) linking them to H-1B, ITIN lending, energy and pharma policy, and argues SAVE Act benefits their interests via filibuster protection.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

. @PunchbowlNews would you like to comment on this business model I've reversed engineered of how you keep @LeaderJohnThune in line? https://t.co/Wl32OL6WPl

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@PunchbowlNews @LeaderJohnThune Punchbowl, would you also like to comment on how virtually every major sponsor of yours has donated to John Thune for a total of 1.2 million? @AndrewDesiderio , any comments? https://t.co/kRCKnvehrM

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@PunchbowlNews @LeaderJohnThune @AndrewDesiderio By the way ... the only people who are sponsoring me on this are my $3/month subscribers. I don't know any heavy hitter here who's been approached to go against SAVE America Act. John Thune is your paid influencer. This is the mother of all projections.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

Let's go through Thune's handlers, shall we? The crossover Punchbowl sponsors who also donated to Thune. Goldman Sachs, $150,000 to Thune: Top financial-sector H-1B user. Relies on foreign talent pipeline for trading, quant, and tech roles. Primary stake: filibuster preservation blocks financial regulation reform. A stricter enforcement ecosystem threatens their workforce model and signals a broader documentation-verification environment they oppose.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

Comcast/NBCUniversal, $120,000 to Thune: Major H-1B user for engineering and tech. Owns MSNBC, the cable network that platforms @AndrewDesiderio himself to amplify Thune's framing nationally. Comcast's cable/infrastructure workforce includes significant numbers of undocumented- adjacent workers. Unique dual stake: financial interest in immigration permissiveness AND editorial interest in maintaining the access journalism model.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

Chevron, $111,000 to Thune: Uses H-1B visas for petroleum engineers and technical staff. Refinery and pipeline operations rely on immigrant labor at lower skill tiers. Stake in SAVE Act specifically is moderate — primary lobbying focus is energy regulation — but benefits structurally from filibuster preservation that slows all enforcement legislation.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

Merck, $100,000 to Thune: Top pharma H-1B employer. Approximately 30% of US pharmaceutical researchers are foreign-born on work visas. Merck has actively lobbied for STEM immigration expansion. PhRMA member — same filibuster-dependency rationale: drug pricing reform dies at 60 votes. A tighter identity-verification enforcement environment would disrupt their researcher pipeline.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

Wells Fargo, $90,000 to Thune: Banks undocumented immigrants via ITIN (Individual Taxpayer Identification Number) accounts — a significant revenue stream. Wells Fargo has an active ITIN mortgage lending program that extends home loans to non-citizens without Social Security Numbers. Strict ID verification norms that SAVE Act signals would threaten this customer base. Also a major H-1B employer for technology roles.

DataRepublican
Posted - March 10, 2026 at 2:12 PM
Saved - March 10, 2026 at 3:15 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m challenging PunchbowlNews on how John Thune’s influence may be shaped by sponsor donations totaling about $1.2 million, arguing Thune is a paid influencer and that elite donors drive policy around the SAVE Act. I name corporate sponsors, urge audits, call for accountability, and push for clearer data. I close with a Cyberspace quote to underscore preserving autonomy from power—asking what we do now.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

. @PunchbowlNews would you like to comment on this business model I've reversed engineered of how you keep @LeaderJohnThune in line? https://t.co/Wl32OL6WPl

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@PunchbowlNews @LeaderJohnThune Punchbowl, would you also like to comment on how virtually every major sponsor of yours has donated to John Thune for a total of 1.2 million? @AndrewDesiderio , any comments? https://t.co/kRCKnvehrM

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@PunchbowlNews @LeaderJohnThune @AndrewDesiderio By the way ... the only people who are sponsoring me on this are my $3/month subscribers. I don't know any heavy hitter here who's been approached to go against SAVE America Act. John Thune is your paid influencer. This is the mother of all projections.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

Let's go through Thune's handlers, shall we? The crossover Punchbowl sponsors who also donated to Thune. Goldman Sachs, $150,000 to Thune: Top financial-sector H-1B user. Relies on foreign talent pipeline for trading, quant, and tech roles. Primary stake: filibuster preservation blocks financial regulation reform. A stricter enforcement ecosystem threatens their workforce model and signals a broader documentation-verification environment they oppose.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

Comcast/NBCUniversal, $120,000 to Thune: Major H-1B user for engineering and tech. Owns MSNBC, the cable network that platforms @AndrewDesiderio himself to amplify Thune's framing nationally. Comcast's cable/infrastructure workforce includes significant numbers of undocumented- adjacent workers. Unique dual stake: financial interest in immigration permissiveness AND editorial interest in maintaining the access journalism model.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

Chevron, $111,000 to Thune: Uses H-1B visas for petroleum engineers and technical staff. Refinery and pipeline operations rely on immigrant labor at lower skill tiers. Stake in SAVE Act specifically is moderate — primary lobbying focus is energy regulation — but benefits structurally from filibuster preservation that slows all enforcement legislation.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

Merck, $100,000 to Thune: Top pharma H-1B employer. Approximately 30% of US pharmaceutical researchers are foreign-born on work visas. Merck has actively lobbied for STEM immigration expansion. PhRMA member — same filibuster-dependency rationale: drug pricing reform dies at 60 votes. A tighter identity-verification enforcement environment would disrupt their researcher pipeline.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

Wells Fargo, $90,000 to Thune: Banks undocumented immigrants via ITIN (Individual Taxpayer Identification Number) accounts — a significant revenue stream. Wells Fargo has an active ITIN mortgage lending program that extends home loans to non-citizens without Social Security Numbers. Strict ID verification norms that SAVE Act signals would threaten this customer base. Also a major H-1B employer for technology roles.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

American Express, $75,000 to Thune: H-1B user for technology and data science roles. Provides financial services to international travelers and non-citizen customers. Opposes documentation requirements that reduce the size of their serviceable customer base. A confirmed Punchbowl event attendee (Brett Loper, Govt Affairs) and consistent Thune donor.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@PunchbowlNews @LeaderJohnThune @AndrewDesiderio Google/Alphabet, $75,000 to Thune: Among the largest H-1B sponsors in the United States annually. Lobbied against mandatory E-Verify. Employees donated heavily to FWD . us (the Zuckerberg-founded pro-immigration lobbying coalition). Google supported DACA protections.

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

Meta/Facebook, $72,500 to Thune: Zuckerberg co-founded FWD . us in 2013 — the most prominent pro-immigration corporate lobbying coalition in Washington. Meta subject of a reinstated federal lawsuit (2024) for systematically preferring foreign workers over US citizens in job postings. Spent $935K+ funding American Edge Project newsletter ads on Punchbowl, Axios, and Politico while lobbying against tech regulation.

@jdwoods2054 - J Woods

@DataRepublican @PunchbowlNews @LeaderJohnThune I’m one of your subscribers. Great work — but do you know who (in the senate) isn’t beholden? No sense in replacing Thune with a clone.

@marki2059 - Mark Iverson

@DataRepublican @PunchbowlNews @LeaderJohnThune @DataRepublican might want to add reid hoffman to the list of funders. https://t.co/MjeGCDOjV4

@TexanQueenB - FloridaQueenBee🌷🐝 ✝️

@DataRepublican @PunchbowlNews @LeaderJohnThune @HouseGOP, you’d better remove Thune from his position or you’ll all be primaried!

@GaryPNabhan - Gary P. Nabhan

@DataRepublican @PunchbowlNews @LeaderJohnThune John Thune’s financial backers are a who’s who of open borders advocates.

@RelentlessLaman - Black Sheep American

@DataRepublican @PunchbowlNews @LeaderJohnThune Who is the paid influencer now?

@Leonard94559812 - Leonardo

@DataRepublican @PunchbowlNews @LeaderJohnThune Pls Change the chart to “Save America Act” thanks!

@CubsWin1776 - ☘️Holy Grail☘️

@DataRepublican @PunchbowlNews @LeaderJohnThune Welcome to 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 https://t.co/YcIyH9pH9G

@deegert_debbie - Deegert

@DataRepublican @PunchbowlNews @LeaderJohnThune @LeaderJohnThune caught with his hand in the punchbowl jar.

@cardart4 - Suzie

@DataRepublican @PunchbowlNews @LeaderJohnThune We now know the way…..what do we do about it?

@Ed53861632 - Eagles

@DataRepublican @PunchbowlNews @LeaderJohnThune I’m always curious if Congress have their staffers go to the donors with a specific donation number in mind. Another words do members in Congress solicit donations. They are voting on issues based on donors dollar amount. The criminal syndicate operating hand book.

@BeaChicandSmart - Beatrice

@DataRepublican @PunchbowlNews @LeaderJohnThune @LeaderJohnThune we want you audited and investigated. @SecScottBessent @FBIDirectorKash

@Northery84 - Mike

@DataRepublican @PunchbowlNews @LeaderJohnThune What would corporations lose from only allowing US citizens to vote in US elections?

@olerismonlane - Karen Louise

@DataRepublican @PunchbowlNews @LeaderJohnThune If it passes, you may have helped save America. 🙏🇺🇸 Thank you for your true journalism.

@lesshate255352 - pinkunicorns

@DataRepublican @PunchbowlNews @LeaderJohnThune This is all so disheartening..My husband,God bless him,has always believed that voting was an illusionary prop..designed to make sure we feel like we matter,and don't feel disenfranchised enough to quit paying taxes.

@chienblanc - Robert

@DataRepublican @PunchbowlNews @LeaderJohnThune This is nice but where is the data to support the necessity of the SAVE act? How many illegals voted in 2016, 2020, and 2024?

@CmnSensor - Common Sensor

@DataRepublican @Rinainteriors @PunchbowlNews @LeaderJohnThune There is always a reason! This is Thune’s reason. They always call out others for what they are themselves. Thune is a paid influencer himself. Dirty! Why do these big corporations oppose the Save Act? Find this out and the curtain falls down on Thune. “Hello Leader Thune”…

@JohnMorgan64 - John Morgan

@DataRepublican @SWOhioGal @PunchbowlNews @LeaderJohnThune I think they all pass this model around.

@southern_dr - @SouthernLadyDr

@DataRepublican @PunchbowlNews @LeaderJohnThune John is so BUSTED. Now dive into his business dealings with McConnell’s wife’s companies.

@EndOfIllusion - Deus X Machina

@DataRepublican @PunchbowlNews @LeaderJohnThune @LeaderJohnThune how about your comment senator?????????

@Based_Barbie_ - Based_Barbie_

@DataRepublican @PunchbowlNews @LeaderJohnThune Incredible work!! Can we please update the bill name to the SAVE America Act? It has some important distinctions and more robust components than the original SAVE Act! 😊

@padigi00 - Paul

@DataRepublican @PunchbowlNews @LeaderJohnThune @LeaderJohnThune Get the dam SAVE Act done NOW!!!!!!

@CharlesGrooms - Charles Grooms

@DataRepublican @PunchbowlNews @LeaderJohnThune 😂Evil Exposed: Data uncovered The Stress points.

@SoCalSister22 - Susie

@DataRepublican @PunchbowlNews @LeaderJohnThune What a racket.

@PaulRevereRide3 - Paul Revere

@DataRepublican @PunchbowlNews @LeaderJohnThune We need to create the 'inverse Cramer' model for voting. Anti donor voting to keep 'big money' from buying our government. Can't get worse than what we've done over the past 100+ years.

@EdwardMondini - Edward Mondini

@DataRepublican @PunchbowlNews @LeaderJohnThune That’s what happens when voters are hoodwinked to elect RINOs whose only constituent is their bank account. Best business model: stop electing loser politicians who DESPISE voters.

@HawbyKenny - Kenny Hawblitz

@DataRepublican @PunchbowlNews @LeaderJohnThune How much foreign influence is exerted on Tunedout?

@photomatt - Matt Mullenweg

"Governments of the Industrial World, you weary giants of flesh and steel, I come from Cyberspace, the new home of Mind. On behalf of the future, I ask you of the past to leave us alone. You are not welcome among us. You have no sovereignty where we gather." 30 years a 1 month later, it seems like an apt time to revisit John Perry Barlow’s Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace. The poetry is amazing. https://www.eff.org/cyberspace-independence

RealFletch17
Posted - March 9, 2026 at 12:22 PM
Saved - March 10, 2026 at 7:24 AM

@RealFletch17 - Fletch17

The Crown and The Lloyd’s of London Buh Bye Checkmate TRUMP! https://t.co/4aFxThBYmV

lovetocook12345
Posted - March 8, 2026 at 10:42 AM
Saved - March 10, 2026 at 6:40 AM

@lovetocook12345 - Santa Trump.. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Nykkie spells out the Obama Paradox.. Can you Say F. U. B. A. R. https://t.co/mFxyga4hAU

WallStreetApes
Posted - March 10, 2026 at 2:12 AM
Saved - March 10, 2026 at 2:39 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I grew up Muslim and studied the Qur'an for years. In this clip I say the audience missed what was said because it was in Arabic. It quotes Surah 9:5, “the sword,” often called the verse of the sword, about fighting until submission and paying jizya. I question symbolism, context, and how religious texts are used in modern politics, asking if people would stay silent for another faith.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Woman who grew up as a Muslim exposes we all missed what was said at the mosque Zohran Mamdani gave his speech at when he got elected mayor of New York City She says we all missed it because it was in Arabic They called to kill all the infidels (us) “Listen very carefully to the verse that is being recited here: (She shows the footage, it really happened) ‘Oh, the killing of the infidels by the sword’ For context, I grew up Muslim. I studied the Qur'an in Islam for years. I wore hijab, my head, and the verse that you just heard is from the Qur'an. It's Surah nine verse five, and it's often referred to by many scholars as the verse of the sword. I mean, this guy kind of has no shame. — This verse speaks about fighting opposing groups until they submit to a political authority and pay a tax that's called the jizya, and the jizya is meant to subdue and humiliate them. All of this, of course, raises a much larger question about symbolism context and how historical religious texts are viewed in modern political spaces. Let's just be honest for a second. If any other religion recited wartime scripture while a politician was present, would people stay silent about it?“

17QStorm
Posted - March 9, 2026 at 1:12 AM
Saved - March 9, 2026 at 6:39 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read this post claiming Schumer admitted Democrats are desperate to kill the SAVE Act because it would purge millions of illegals from voter rolls using Musk and DOGE’s AI. It says millions would be purged due to fraudulent non-citizen votes, accusing Democrats of rigging elections. It labels it a Deep State scam and urges action to secure the vote, linking to a Telegram channel.

@17QStorm - QThestorm

🚨 THERE IT IS! 🚨 Schumer Just ADMITTED the REAL Reason Democrats Are DESPERATE to Kill the SAVE Act — It Would PURGE Millions of ILLEGALS From Voter Rolls Using Musk & DOGE’s AI System! He spilled the beans: “Millions of people would be purged from the rolls because of this system”… because those are the fraudulent non-citizen votes they’ve been using to RIG our elections for years! Read more🔗https://t.me/+6JMkc-zBix4zZjI0 Democrats just EXPOSED themselves — they NEED the stolen votes and fake rolls to keep stealing America. The Deep State’s replacement scam is CRASHING DOWN! This is our LAST shot to secure the vote and TAKE OUR COUNTRY BACK before it’s gone forever! Follow @17QStorm

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues against the SAVE Act, claiming it would cause gridlock and is a pernicious, nasty piece of legislation described as “Jim Crow two point o.” They allege the SAVE Act would cause more than 20,000,000 people to lose their right to vote, requiring registration with a passport or original birth certificate, and would eliminate vote by mail. The speaker criticizes senior citizens confined to homes by wheelchair, suggesting they would lose their right to vote under the Act. They warn that the voter rolls would be purged using an AI system “set up by Musk and Doge,” so people could show up at the polling place only to be told they’re not on the rolls and would not be notified. The speaker emphasizes that millions would be purged from the rolls because of this system, and voters would be denied notice and turned away at polling sites. The rhetoric likens the measure to one of the nastiest pieces of legislation, returning to the Old South where people were prohibited from voting and spreading it across America. Additionally, the speaker references President Trump’s stance, stating that Trump says he will not sign any legislation until Congress passes Doge, and asserts that “we ain’t passing Doge.” The broader point is that this stance would provoke gridlock in Congress and prevent passage of bills that could lower costs for prescription drugs and electricity.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Until the SAVE Act passes. That means the president's asking for total gridlock. The SAVE Act will not pass because it is such a pernicious, nasty piece of legislation. The SAVE Act is Jim Crow two point o. More than 20,000,000 people would lose their right to vote and you would need to register either a passport or your original birth certificate. How many people have that? How many people have that? It would eliminate vote by mail. Tell that to a senior citizen who's confined to their home in a wheelchair that they're gonna lose their right to vote. And a he would purge the voter rolls using a AI system set up by Musk and Doge so you could show up at polling place this November and they'd say you're no longer on the rolls. They don't even notify you of it. Millions of people would be purged from the rolls because of this system that Musk and Doge put in. You wouldn't be notified. You'd show up at the polling place and they'd say, sorry, Mr. Jones, sorry, Ms. Smith, you're not on the rolls anymore. They don't even notify you. This is one of the nastiest pieces of legislation that I've ever seen. It is going back to the Old South where people were prohibited from voting and spreading it to every corner of America. It is Jim Crow two point o. And when Trump says that he will not sign any legislation until congress passes Doge, mister president, we ain't passing Doge. You are calling for gridlock in the entire congress and none of the bills that will help reduce the cost to people for prescription drugs, for electricity.
AndrewKolvet
Posted - March 8, 2026 at 7:23 AM
Saved - March 9, 2026 at 1:58 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I watched the March 2025 DOGE raid footage on the US Institute of Peace, showing fierce resistance to Trump from day one. The piece quotes Edward Coristine and others calling the actions “jackbooted,” alleges taxpayers funded private jets and Taliban-linked contracts, and shows lawyers claiming access to classified info. An accountant allegedly tried to wipe a terabyte of data, DOGE recovered it, and it’s with the DOJ. Unelected ideologues fleecing taxpayers shouldn’t block the people’s choice.

@AndrewKolvet - Andrew Kolvet

This newly released body cam footage from the March 2025 DOGE raid on the US Institute of Peace shows the insane resistance Trump faced from day one. As Edward Coristine (aka Big Balls) told Jesse Watters last year, this was the “least peaceful” of all the agencies to deal with, and that it used taxpayer funds for private jets, an armory filled with weapons, and contracts with the former members of the Taliban (!!) These are grown adults in full meltdown mode because they realized the gravy train was coming to an end. They referred to lawful orders as "jackbooted police state actions" while refusing to vacate the premises after President Trump issued an order firing them and sending in his DOGE team to clean house. What you see in this video isn’t democracy, it’s an insight into how wild and entitled the DC swamp had grown. Even the officers who were on the scene to ensure order became impatient after realizing these defiant bureaucrats weren't even USIP employees when one said, "we're their lawyers" who were trying to regain access to "classified information" pertaining to "other cases" outside of USIP’s purview. George Foote, one of the lawyers there, even pushed to have Trump officials arrested as "unauthorized intruders." Elon Musk later revealed on X that USIP's chief accountant attempted to wipe over a terabyte of financial data in a desperate cover-up - but DOGE recovered it, and it's now with the DOJ for review. Unelected ideologues fleecing taxpayer dollars shouldn't block the people's choice. This is what draining the swamp looks like, and it’s horrifying just how out of control it had all become. H/T: Footage FOIA’d by Marisa Kabas at The Handbasket Co.

WallStreetApes
Posted - March 8, 2026 at 3:14 PM
Saved - March 8, 2026 at 9:34 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note claims that lab-grown chocolate hits shelves in 2027, with Oreo, Cadbury, and Toblerone funding Israeli biotech because labs are cheaper than farms. I’m told Cadbury Dairy Milk uses vegetable fats alongside cocoa butter in many markets, with standards allowing up to 5% non-cocoa fats; U.S. rules are laxer for milk chocolate. The post also mentions an exposer flagging cadmium trace levels and ultra-processing warnings.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

I verified this and it’s true “Lab-grown chocolate is coming to shelves in 2027. Oreo, Cadbury and Toblerone are already funding the Israeli biotech producing it because a lab is cheaper than a farm” “Cadbury has been quietly replacing your chocolate — This dairy milk isn't legal chocolate in 27 countries, the cocoa butter was replaced with vegetable fat, a cheap blend of 6 industrial oils. What remains is diluted with polyglycerol — Soon even that gets replaced, you'll be eating cells grown in a pharmaceutical tank” Cadbury Dairy Milk (in the UK and many markets) has included vegetable fats (like palm and shea) alongside cocoa butter for years. UK/EU regulations allow up to 5% non-cocoa vegetable fats in chocolate if it meets minimum cocoa solids (20%) and other standards. In America standards are much lower - For milk chocolate specifically: Only 10% chocolate liquor, 12% milk solids, and 3.39% milk fat are required “Exposer flagged lead in cadmium traces with an ultra processing warning”

BarronTNews_
Posted - March 8, 2026 at 9:11 PM
Saved - March 8, 2026 at 9:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that two suspects, Amir Balat and Ibrahim Nikk, accused of attempting to bomb Christians in NYC, are in federal custody. The Mamdani–Bragg machine can’t sweep this under the rug. An explosive device packed with TATP was used—this is terrorism, not a prank. No soft treatment. No activist prosecutors. No revolving door justice. Send them straight to El Salvador’s CECOT so the world sees real consequences.

@BarronTNews_ - ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸

🚨 BREAKING: The two suspects accused of attempting to bomb Christians in New York City are now in federal custody, meaning the Mamdani–Bragg machine in New York can’t quietly sweep this one under the rug. Amir Balat. Ibrahim Nikk. An explosive device packed with TATP was allegedly used in the attack. That is not a prank. That is terrorism. No soft treatment. No activist prosecutors. No revolving door justice. Send them straight to El Salvador’s CECOT and let the world see what real consequences look like.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Emir Balat and Ibrahim Kayumi are reportedly in federal custody and are being interviewed by the FBI in connection with the devices. A source indicates that both individuals are U.S. citizens. Authorities are continuing to monitor additional police activity in an area of New York City's Upper East Side near where the devices were initially thrown yesterday afternoon. Cameras captured six total people taken into custody yesterday. Among those detained was one individual who threw a device outside Gracie Mansion, which occurred during a clash related to a protest. The protest scene and the subsequent detentions appear to be connected to the broader demonstration that unfolded in the vicinity. The initial protest was organized under a bold and provocative message, with participants calling to “stop the Islamic takeover of New York City, stop New York City public Muslim prayer, end quote,” and the events described indicate a confrontation between demonstrators and counterprotesters or law enforcement. The report notes that the clashes and the detentions happened in the context of this protest, and authorities are now pursuing leads related to the devices and the individuals involved. Details indicate that the investigation is focusing on the devices and the individuals connected to them, with Balat and Kayumi identified as persons of interest or subjects in federal custody and being questioned by the FBI. The narrative emphasizes the sequence: the devices were thrown yesterday afternoon, a protest occurred with a charged slogan, six people were taken into custody during or after the incident, and Balat and Kayumi are being treated as individuals of interest in the federal inquiry, with ongoing surveillance and police activity in the same neighborhood. No further information is provided about the nature of the devices, the exact charges, or the broader implications of the protest and detentions beyond the stated facts. The report centers on the custody status of Balat and Kayumi, the FBI interviews, the six-detainment tally, the specific incident outside Gracie Mansion, and the monitoring of activity in the Upper East Side linked to the event.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Emir Balat and Ibrahim Kayumi are reportedly in federal custody and now being interviewed by the FBI in connection to the to the devices. A source tells us both are US citizens, and right now we're monitoring more police activity activity in an area of New York City's Upper East Side near where the devices were initially thrown yesterday afternoon. Cameras captured six total people taken into custody yesterday including one of them who thrown yesterday outside Gracie Mansion happened during a clash of protest. The initial protest was called, quote, stop the Islamic takeover of New York City, stop New York City public Muslim prayer, end quote, and was
elonmusk
Posted - March 8, 2026 at 12:43 AM
Saved - March 8, 2026 at 8:56 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

That’s what he said https://t.co/C3adAsScXQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues in favor of an amendment described as the most effective anti-fraud measure found, asserting that the Social Security card is already used across the country as identification. He contends that passing a law against using the Social Security card would be misleading, and he questions why the chairman and the distinguished minority member of the Social Security committee would oppose such a law. He emphasizes that everywhere people are asked for a Social Security card, and that proving one’s eligibility for employment often requires both a driver’s license and a Social Security card. He labels the amendment as anti-fraud and notes that the problem of illegal immigration and fraud is often explained to constituents as people coming here and obtaining jobs and benefits illegally. The gentleman from Florida is credited with assembling what Speaker 0 calls the most effective anti-fraud measure found, described as not changing the actions of the government one bit. Despite its apparent effectiveness, there is substantial opposition to the amendment. Speaker 0 expresses concern that the bill, which began with good intentions, could become a political liability—something the public believes is a form of action without substance. He warns that whenever someone proposes a rational, small step to address fraud, opponents raise hypothetical concerns that derail progress. He stresses that addressing fraud in immigration requires support for the amendment, arguing that those who want to combat fraud have no choice but to back it. In closing, Speaker 0 urges support for the amendment and reiterates the urgency of stopping fraud related to immigration. His time ends with the call to back the amendment.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank the gentleman. Salute him for his work on this rise in support of the amendment. First of all, Social Security card is used from one end of America to the other as an identification card right now. Who are we kidding? If you wanna pass a law and says it shouldn't be, I would ask the chairman and the distinguished minority member of the Social Security meeting the committee to pass that law. But let's let's admit the truth. Everywhere people go, they're asked for a Social Security card. In fact, one way to prove you're a bonafide person who can have a job is to ask for a driver's license and a Social Security card. This is an anti fraud amendment. All the over where we go, people say, well, why can't you stop illegal immigrants or others from coming here? And the number one answer we give our constituents is when they come here, they can get jobs, get benefits against the law because of fraud. And here, the gentleman from Florida has put together the most effective anti fraud measure we can find without it changing the actions of the government one bit, and we find all this opposition. Ladies and gentlemen of this chamber, what I worry about is that this bill, which started out with good intentions, whether you agree with it or disagree with it, is gonna end up being the same kind of thing that the public gets angry with us on. We say we're doing something and we do nothing. Because every time someone makes a rational and small proposal to get something done, people say, well, what about this hypothetical, that hypothetical, etcetera? I urge support of this amendment. If you believe you wanna stop fraud in immigration, you have no choice but to support this amendment. Gentleman's time has expired.
LightOnLiberty
Posted - March 7, 2026 at 6:45 AM
Saved - March 7, 2026 at 9:07 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I swear under oath after 27 hours at Detroit's TCF Center that I witnessed MASSIVE election fraud: late-night ballot dumps. My manager, Nick Economagunas (partial Dominion owner), ordered me there instead of the Detroit elections building. I saw vans full of ballots, photos of people with ballots from a Chicago warehouse, and at 4:30 AM Baxter brought in boxes from the rear. Each box held ~600 ballots, totaling ~50,000 illegal ballots dumped before 6 AM shift change. This is the fraud we warned about in 2020.

@LightOnLiberty - Bridgett Fertig

A Dominion contractor with two degrees, swore under oath in her affidavit after working 27 hours at Detroit's TCF Center that she witnessed MASSIVE amounts of clear election fraud involving late-night ballot dumps. She detailed how her manager, Nick Economagunas (part owner of Dominion), ordered her there instead of the Detroit elections building. She saw vans FULL of ballots arriving, photos of people carrying ballots out of a "Chicago warehouse," and at 4:30 AM, Mr. Baxter personally brought in boxes from the rear entrance. She stated each box holding approx 600 ballots, totaling around 50,000 ILLEGAL ballots dumped onto tables just before a 6 AM shift change! This is exactly the kind of election fraud we've been warning about that was running RAMPANT across the country during the 2020 election!

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that in their affidavit they list 19 points and describe spending 27 hours at the TCF Center. They state they are a mother with two children and two degrees, and claim they would never write an affidavit under oath just to write it, noting that you can go to prison for this. They explain that they was initially supposed to work at the Detroit Department of Elections building, an order by their manager, Nick Economagunas, whom they identify as part owner of Dominion. They claim they have emails confirming the arrangement and that they were trained on the adjudication and tabulation process. An email allegedly instructs them to park in a lot and be shuttled to what they call the “Chicago Warehouse.” The speaker asserts that there was illegal activity at that location, stating that there are pictures of people carrying ballots out of the place and vans full of ballots leaving. Around 4:30 AM, they say there was an announcement that a new shipment of ballots was arriving, and that these boxes of ballots were brought in by “mister Baxter” from the rear of the room. They personally witnessed Mr. Baxter carrying boxes from the rear basement of the TCF Center to the tables. They describe each box as containing approximately 600 ballots, and note that the tables were 10-foot tables and about seven tables in total, all full of boxes of ballots. They estimate that about 50,000 ballots were brought in, clarifying that not all ballots were necessarily from the rear entrance, but that there were far more ballots than the ones brought in from the rear entrance. They recount the timeline as starting at 6 AM, with shipments arriving around 4:30–5 AM, and three rounds of activity earlier in the night—from around 10 PM to 1 AM and 1 AM to 4 AM—followed by the arrival of the 4:30 AM boxes. With the shift change, most volunteers, who had expected to be there from 10 PM to 5 AM, left at 5 AM, leaving the speaker to stay. The shift change occurred, and at 6 AM, Baxter and his management team resumed on the microphone. They allegedly stated, “this is what democracy is is supposed to look like,” and the whole room cheered in response to the new shift.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have 19 things in my affidavit. I was at the TCF Center for twenty seven hours. I'm a mother. I have two children, and I have two degrees. I'm very, I I would never I don't know any woman in the world that would write a an affidavit under oath just to write it. You know? You can go to prison for this. So, anyways, I wanna make this very clear. My I was initially supposed to, work at the, Detroit Department of Elections building. That was an order by my manager, Nick Economagunas, part owner of Dominion. I have it all in emails. What was going I was trained on the adjudication and tabulation process. So in the email, it says you are to park in a parking lot and get shuttled over to this, they called it the they referred to it as the Chicago Warehouse. Speaker 1: I Speaker 0: know for a fact there was illegal activity going on there. People have pictures of people carrying ballots out of that place. There is pictures of vans full of ballots coming out of that place. Speaker 1: Then around 04:30AM, we had an announcement that a new shipment of ballots were arriving, and these boxes of ballots were brought in by mister Baxter himself at 04:30AM from the rear of the room. So I personally, I witnessed mister Baxter carrying boxes from the rear of the basement of the TCF center into the the the tables. So each box, approximate 600 ballots, and there was like a full what you have to know is that these tables, there's about seven tables. They were 10 foot tables each. Every table was full of boxes of ballots. It's not tens of thousands or 20 thousands. I approximate 50,000 ballots were brought in. Now were all of those ballots brought in from the rear entrance to the TCF center? I don't know. They were brought in from the TCF center, but they was there was a lot more than just the ones that were brought in from the t the rear entrance of the TCF center. And I'm talking this is the AM. This is when we're starting at 6AM, the 04:30, 5AM. It was a 50,000 ballots on the table equal to the two rounds that we did before. We did a round around 10PM to about one p 1AM and then 1AM to about 4AM. And then this the the boxes were brought in from the rear around 04:30, then they had the shift change from around five to six. So with this the shift change, most of the the volunteers were were tired at this point. They only expected to be there from 10PM to 5AM. So ninety ninety plus percent of them left at 5AM. I decided to stick around. So they had the shift change. At this at 6AM, mister Baxter and his, management team got back on the microphone and said, this is what the news the new shift change, right, the new employees says, this is what democracy is is supposed to look like. Right in front of everyone, the whole room cheered.
1Nicdar
Posted - March 6, 2026 at 8:23 PM
Saved - March 7, 2026 at 4:22 AM

@1Nicdar - DK🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸

🚨JUST IN: In a new jaw-dropping revelation, 'new emails' prove Attorney General Merrick Garland LIED when he said that the decision to RAID 'Mar-a-Lago' was his and his alone. The raid was, in fact, ORCHESTRATED and ORDERED by President Joe Biden’s White House. https://t.co/XCcICioEru

iluminatibot
Posted - March 6, 2026 at 4:33 PM
Saved - March 6, 2026 at 11:53 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

“Tommy Matola is a Devil” “I owe Sony one more album - they can’t get away with it” Michael Jackson’s timely demise seems more convenient for the Global Elite the more you see clips like this. https://t.co/Xliq9sWHYq

Video Transcript AI Summary
Michael Jackson speaks about his frustrations with Sony and Tomy Mottola, describing Mottola as a devil and alleging Sony exploits artists. He claims to have generated several billion dollars for Sony and says they believed his focus would always be on music and dancing, but he asserts that he’s outsmarted them as a free agent. He describes leaving Sony after one more album, a box set containing two new songs he wrote long ago, and explains that he writes at least 120 songs per album. He says he can complete the box set and give Sony the two songs, thereby leaving Sony as a free agent while claiming to own half of Sony. He notes that Sony is very angry about this move but maintains he did good business. He adds that the way Sony seeks revenge is by trying to destroy his album, but he believes that “art good art never dies” and expresses affection for his work on Unbreakable. Michael references Diana and Waldo and thanks them, stating his love for them and others present, and mentions turning off or taping something, with an aside that he doesn’t mind and to tape it. In a separate recounting, he says Mariah Carey came to him crying after a divorce, describing her distress and saying that “this is an evil man” who taps her phones and is “very, very evil,” and that they must continue their drive until he is terminated. Overall, the statements portray allegations of exploitation by Sony and Tomy Mottola, a plan to leave Sony while claiming ownership of half the company, a claim about an intent to destroy his album as retaliation, strong feelings about Mariah Carey’s claims of harassment, and appreciation for Diana and Waldo.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And Tommy Mottola is a devil. I'm not supposed to say what I'm gonna say right now, but I I have to let you in on a secret. Please don't videotape what I'm gonna say. Okay? Because the companies take advantage of them. They really do. And Sony Sony be being a you know, being the artist that I am at Sony, I I've I've generated several billion dollars for Sony, several billion. And they they really thought that my mind is always on music and dancing and and I and it usually is, but they never thought that this performer myself would out think Speaker 1: them. Yeah. Speaker 0: So we can't let them get away with what what they're trying to do because now I'm a free agent. I just owe Sony one more album. It's just a box set, really. It's with two new songs, which I've written ages ago. Because every album that I record, I write, like, literally, I'm telling you the truth. I like I write at least a 120 songs every album I do. So I can do the box set and just give them any two songs. So so I'm leaving Sony a free agent of owning half of Sony. So I own half of Sony's, and I'm leaving them, and they they're very angry at me because of it. But I just I just did good business. You know? Speaker 1: Tell him. Tell him, Michael. Tell a story. Speaker 0: But This is unreal. So Oh my god. The way they get revenge is to try and destroy my album. But but I've I've always said, you know, art art good art never dies. Thank you. I love Unbreakable. You know? Turn that off, please. You know what? You know what? I don't mind. Tape it. Speaker 1: Baku is getting gangster today. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 0: Mariah Carey, after divorce and time, came to me crying. Crying. She was crying so bad I had to hold her. And she said to me that this is an evil man. And Michael, this man follows me, she said. He taps her phones, and he's very, very evil, and she doesn't trust him. And he is a horrible human being, and we we have to continue our drive until he's terminated. Yes. Speaker 1: There you go. Speaker 0: We can't allow him to do this to great artistry. We just can't. I just want you to know I appreciate everything you've done. You've been amazing. You're so loyal, Diana. Everybody, Waldo, all the people here, I love you all. You've been amazing. Speaker 1: Thank you. Speaker 0: I love you.
libsoftiktok
Posted - March 6, 2026 at 7:13 PM
Saved - March 6, 2026 at 7:53 PM

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

BREAKING: Gina LaPlaca, the former Democrat mayor and current city committee member of Lumberton, NJ, ADMITTED to child abuse and DUI charges after driving drunk with her toddler in the car. She WILL NOT be serving any prison time and will continue holding public office. UNREAL. SHE MUST RESIGN

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

BREAKING: Gina LaPlaca, the Democrat mayor of Lumberton, NJ was arrested this week for drunk driving with her toddler in the car. In 2023, she was also arrested on assault charges. She needs to RESIGN. https://t.co/ZIgkePvy9h

wideawake_media
Posted - March 6, 2026 at 9:01 AM
Saved - March 6, 2026 at 7:02 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2019 I warned that a Chinese-style social credit system is being built in plain sight. Algorithms decide my life—if my online activity or purchases diverge, I can’t buy tickets, board planes, or get a job. These records are created and shared by companies and governments, driven by our data. They’re not selling information; they’re selling us—our future, past, identity—and in doing so, they steal our power.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

In 2019, Edward Snowden warned us that the infrastructure for a Chinese-style social credit system was being built in plain sight. "If any of your activities online, if your purchases, if your associations... are in any way different from what the government... would like them to be, you're no longer able to purchase train tickets. You're no longer able to board an airplane.... You may not be eligible for a job." "All of these things are increasingly being created and programmed and decided by algorithms. And those algorithms are fuelled by precisely the innocent data that our devices are creating all of the time—constantly, invisibly, quietly—right now." "And these activity records are being created and shared and collected... constantly by companies and governments. And ultimately, it means as they sell these... what they are selling is not information. What they are selling is us." "They're selling our future. They're selling our past. They are selling our history, our identity. And ultimately, they are stealing our power."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: What about the public attitude held by millions of everyday Americans? All I've got on a computer is pictures of my family, CCTV cameras that are prevalent in a ton of American cities and overseas capitals. Those cameras are your friend if you're innocent and have nothing to hide. Speaker 1: Well, I'd say that's very much what the average Chinese citizen believed or perhaps even still to this day believes. But we see how these same technologies are being applied to create what they call the social credit system. If any of these family photos, if any of your activities online, if your purchases, if your associations, if your friends are in any way different from what the government or the powers that be of the moment would like them to be, you're no longer able to purchase train tickets. You're no longer able to board an airplane. You may not be able to get a passport. You may not be eligible for a job. You might not be able to work for the government. All of these things are increasingly being created and programmed and decided by algorithms, and those algorithms are fueled by precisely the innocent data that our devices are creating all of the time constantly, invisibly, quietly right now. Our devices are casting all of these records that we do not see being created, that in aggregate seem very innocent. Even if you can't see the content of these communications, the activity records, what the government calls metadata, which they argue they do not need a warrant to collect, tells the whole story. And these activity records are being created and shared and collected and intercepted constantly by companies and governments. And ultimately it means as they sell these, as they trade these, as they make their businesses on the backs of these records, what they are selling is not information, what they are selling is us. They're selling our future. They're selling our past. They are selling our history, our identity, and ultimately, they are stealing our power.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What about the public attitude held by millions of everyday Americans? All I've got on a computer is pictures of my family, CCTV cameras that are prevalent in a ton of American cities and overseas capitals. Those cameras are your friend if you're innocent and have nothing to hide. Speaker 1: Well, I'd say that's very much what the average Chinese citizen believed or perhaps even still to this day believes. But we see how these same technologies are being applied to create what they call the social credit system. If any of these family photos, if any of your activities online, if your purchases, if your associations, if your friends are in any way different from what the government or the powers that be of the moment would like them to be, you're no longer able to purchase train tickets. You're no longer able to board an airplane. You may not be able to get a passport. You may not be eligible for a job. You might not be able to work for the government. All of these things are increasingly being created and programmed and decided by algorithms, and those algorithms are fueled by precisely the innocent data that our devices are creating all of the time constantly, invisibly, quietly right now. Our devices are casting all of these records that we do not see being created, that in aggregate seem very innocent. Even if you can't see the content of these communications, the activity records, what the government calls metadata, which they argue they do not need a warrant to collect, tells the whole story. And these activity records are being created and shared and collected and intercepted constantly by companies and governments. And ultimately it means as they sell these, as they trade these, as they make their businesses on the backs of these records, what they are selling is not information, what they are selling is us. They're selling our future. They're selling our past. They are selling our history, our identity, and ultimately, they are stealing our power.
WayneDolcefino
Posted - March 5, 2026 at 8:06 PM
Saved - March 6, 2026 at 4:27 PM

@WayneDolcefino - Dolcefino Media

This Texas City cop learns a lesson that he can't take our equipment or keep us from filming a public meeting. https://t.co/xF3dxrxIP8

AntonioTweets2
Posted - March 6, 2026 at 2:31 AM
Saved - March 6, 2026 at 4:15 PM

@AntonioTweets2 - 🇨🇦 Antonio Tweets

They lied about everything. Even electricity. ⚡️ 👇 https://t.co/tiVqluLnmO

AntonioTweets2
Posted - March 6, 2026 at 2:31 AM
Saved - March 6, 2026 at 4:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Someone claims lies about electricity. Another asks who and where to find the full video. A third identifies Dr. Irwin Moon, a Christian Science educator, noting a 1956 Moody Institute film showing high‑voltage AC induction heating an egg via a coil while the pan stays cool. Described as pure physics with no hidden power or vanishing; Moon lived until 1986. Full original video link provided.

@AntonioTweets2 - 🇨🇦 Antonio Tweets

They lied about everything. Even electricity. ⚡️ 👇 https://t.co/tiVqluLnmO

Video Transcript AI Summary
The description begins with the ring being, in effect, a one turn, shorted secondary. A smaller ring will react even more violently. Here is another ring. This one made of a material we say is non conductive. And it is completely unaffected. Here is another example. Several thousand watts of power were involved in that spark. If we replace the spark gap with a copper coil, The same power now flows through the coil. It's invisible, has no effect on many substances, but it can generate a lot of heat. Wood, paper, things that we think of as being quite inflammable are not affected at all. However, a piece of steel wool bursts into flame instantly. Did you ever fry an egg on a cold stove? It's no trick at all if you have the right equipment. This is a cold hotly. And because it's cold, you can make it out of wood if you like. Just be sure that there's a coil of wire inside and that you connect that coil to a high voltage alternating curve source. The rest is easy. As long as we're being different, we'll use motor oil instead of Crisco. The egg fries very quickly, but the stove remains perfectly cold. And back if you wish to keep it handy, you can fry your egg on the morning newspaper. With a gadget like this, you can get up in the morning, sit on the stove, read the morning newspaper, and fry the eggs in your lap. Another example of the fact that physical forces can be quite selective
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The ring being in effect a one turn, shorted secondary. A smaller ring will react even more violently. Here is another ring. This one made of a material we say is non conductive. And it is completely unaffected. Here is another example. Several thousand watts of power were involved in that spark. If we replace the spark gap with a copper coil, The same power now flows through the coil. It's invisible, has no effect on many substances, but it can generate a lot of heat. Wood, paper, things that we think of as being quite inflammable are not affected at all. However, a piece of steel wool bursts into flame instantly. Did you ever fry an egg on a cold stove? It's no trick at all if you have the right equipment. This is a cold hotly. And because it's cold, you can make it out of wood if you like. Just be sure that there's a coil of wire inside and that you connect that coil to a high voltage alternating curve source. The rest is easy. As long as we're being different, we'll use motor oil instead of Crisco. The egg fries very quickly, but the stove remains perfectly cold. And back if you wish to keep it handy, you can fry your egg on the morning newspaper. With a gadget like this, you can get up in the morning, sit on the stove, read the morning newspaper, and fry the eggs in your lap. Another example of the fact that physical forces can be quite selective

@1spark2ignite - GDog

@AntonioTweets2 Who is this and where can I get the full video @grok?

@grok - Grok

That's Dr. Irwin Moon, a Christian science educator. This 1956 clip from his Moody Institute film series demos high-voltage AC induction: current heats the egg's moisture directly via the coil, while the pan/paper stay cool. Pure physics, no "hidden power" or vanishing—he lived until 1986. Full original: youtube.com/watch?v=-Jiwke…

Lauria1960
Posted - March 5, 2026 at 7:19 PM
Saved - March 6, 2026 at 3:21 PM

@Lauria1960 - 🦨 Skunkle 🦨

https://t.co/aeajQsJl2D

Video Transcript AI Summary
Three critical developments are discussed regarding the Epstein saga, Trump’s strategy, and Putin’s perspective. - Epstein’s expanded role and its geopolitical context: It is claimed that Epstein wasn’t merely running a blackmail operation but was a key financial player in maintaining British imperial banking domination. The narrative notes that during Epstein’s first conviction in 2009, lord Peter Mandelson—current British ambassador to the United States and a figure from Tony Blair’s administration—stayed at Epstein’s house. The implication is that this links Epstein to deeper power dynamics beyond sex trafficking and political kompromat. - Putin’s comments and the postwar imperial context: In a recent interview, Putin remarked that in former colonial empires like Britain or France, they consider the United States responsible for the collapse of their colonial empires, and that this historical negativity persists. The account asserts that after World War II, the United States and Russia helped destroy these empires and assist colonies in achieving independence, a vision associated with Franklin Roosevelt’s postwar outlook, which was said to have been sabotaged when Truman aligned with British imperial schemes. Putin is said to have stressed that only sovereignty will protect Russia, and that until Russia asserts itself as an independent, sovereign power, it will not be respected. The narrative uses these comments to frame Trump’s approach to Russia and Ukraine as recognizing Russia as a sovereign nation with legitimate interests, rather than treating it as a perpetual adversary. - Trump’s counteroffense and the Ukraine question: The speaker contends that Trump understands sovereignty and has approached the Ukraine conflict from the standpoint of treating Russia as a sovereign nation with legitimate interests. It is claimed that Trump’s posture is not a capitulation to neocons or a betrayal of his base, and is connected to a broader movement toward freeing the United States from empire and imperial tools of war and money. The recent big announcement by Trump is cited as aligning with this sovereign-first strategy. Additional context is provided by Susan Kokinda, who recalls being at the 2024 Republican convention and describes Trump’s 2024 campaign momentum in a narrative tying together Epstein’s financial role, the anti-imperial aims, and the potential for a world where empires are relegated to history.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here's something Steve Bannon, Charlie Kirk, and Tucker Carlson haven't told you about Jeffrey Epstein. That while Epstein was serving time on his first conviction in 2009, lord Peter Mandelson stayed at his house. Mandelson is the current British ambassador to The United States and was part of Tony Blair's political machine when he was prime minister. That should begin to give you a little more insight into how all of the sound and fury about the Epstein files is obscuring a much deeper battle that is going on. Most people think that the Epstein story is just about sex trafficking and compromising politicians and billionaires with underage girls. Well, that's certainly part of it. But if you're fixated on that, you'll miss Trump's history making moves. Because the real battle is Donald Trump's commitment to free The United States from the empire's control, control which is exercised with the classic imperial tools of war and money. Epstein wasn't just running a blackmail operation. He was a key financial player in maintaining British imperial banking domination in the world. This is Susan Kokinda. And one year ago today, I was on the floor of the Republican convention in Milwaukee as part of the Michigan delegation, where I was privileged to watch Donald Trump launch his triumphant march to a second term as president. With over fifty years of political organizing against the modern day British empire under my belt, I can tell you that those four days in July, coming just after Trump's miraculous escape from assassination, marked a turning point in history. Now add to that a recently released interview with Russian President Putin, and you'll see emerging the potential for a coming world in which nations are sovereign economically and strategically, and in which empires, today's globalists, are relegated to the dustbin of history. So in this midweek update, I'm gonna look at three critical developments. How Putin's recent comments about the British and French empires provide the necessary context for understanding Trump's latest moves on Ukraine, Epstein's role as a financial player in maintaining British imperial banking domination, and Trump's political and economic counteroffense. So let's start with Putin's comments that provide some crucial context for what Trump is doing. In a recently released interview, Putin dropped an observation about one of the most important elements of post World War two history. He said, in some former colonial empires like Britain or France, they consider us responsible for the collapse of their colonial empires. And this historical negativity persists. The fact is, after World War II, The United States, along with Russia in some ways, worked toward the destruction of these empires and worked to assist the colonies in getting their independence and sovereignty. Now that's the same outlook that Franklin Roosevelt had for the postwar period, an outlook which was sabotaged when British puppet Harry Truman instead threw America's might in with the British imperial and geopolitical schemes instead. And Putin kept coming back to the geopolitical underpinnings of how Russia was treated and lied to in the post Soviet period. And he made clear that only sovereignty will protect Russia. He said, it became clear that until we assert ourselves as an independent sovereign power capable of defending our future, we will not be respected. Now Trump understands that, and he's approached the question of settling the Ukraine war from the standpoint of treating Russia as a sovereign nation with legitimate interests, not as a perpetual enemy to be threatened and challenged. Look at his big announcement on Monday from that standpoint. It's not a capitulation to the neocons or a betrayal of its base.
RedpillDrifter
Posted - March 4, 2026 at 7:02 PM
Saved - March 4, 2026 at 7:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read a post by Buddy Webb claiming underground homes, tunnels, and facilities used for child trafficking are hidden around us. He says entrances and exits are everywhere, including under his own Midland, TX home and in stores and parks. He has many videos with evidence, and asserts these tunnels exist nationwide. Channel: youtube.com/@BuddyWebb, @BuddyWebb12.

@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter

UNDERGROUND HOMES, TUNNELS, AND FACILITIES USED FOR CHILD TRAFFICKING ALL AROUND YOU This is Buddy Webb. You may have never heard of him but he's been exposing underground homes and tunnels within his local area of Midland, TX, including residential neighborhoods, stores like Walmart and Home Depot, parks, constructions sites etc. Entrances and exits are EVERYWHERE. He uncovered tunnels that are being built underground and leading to peoples homes for kidnappings and trafficking. He found this out when he realized there were people under his own home. He has so many more videos on his channel proving his claims with a mountain of evidence. They are all over the place and I guarantee it isn't just his area. These are ALL OVER THE COUNTRY IN EVERY TOWN, CITY, AND STATE. Here is his channel below and X link youtube.com/@BuddyWebb @BuddyWebb12

Video Transcript AI Summary
Buddy Webb from Midland, Texas describes a project in front of the Midland Home Depot where they’re digging deep with a shoring device on the west side of the road near the loop. He says he lives behind the store and wants to show map screens he saved, comparing “before” and “after” images of live trees being removed. He references Google Earth time-stamped screenshots to illustrate changes from 2008 (before he moved here) to 2009, noting a suspected tunnel entrance in a neighbor’s backyard that wasn’t there in 2008 but is in 2009. He mentions that during this period the previous homeowner died and raises a question about a potential connection, alleging the previous homeowner, Mike Lawhan, was murdered and taken to Fort Worth the week before underground activity started in the backyard. Webb shares that after he was shot in 2012, and in 2014, the suspected tunnel entrance remained there. He began posting pictures online, after which the live tree behind the home was removed along with the tunnel-related infrastructure. He claims the area behind Home Depot and between the house and the store housed a live tree that was removed, and that a tunnel may connect to his backyard underground home. He plans to show more photos to support this. He presents an oldest city map showing his house and backyard, where the underground home is believed to be. He points to what looks like a ditch near the backyard, a line projecting toward a telephone pole (the live tree), and two side-by-side manholes. He notes buried concrete blocks at the corner of his house that align with the suspected tunnel entrance in the neighbor’s yard. Webb discusses images where the tunnel entrance is still open in the backyard, and where a line of concrete blocks and possible dirt lines appear. He refers to a 2012 map and a 2014 image showing the area behind the Home Depot wall, the two manholes, and the missing tree. He claims the back fence was removed, two dump-trucks of dirt were dumped in a neighbor’s yard, and that footage of this was censored when he posted it. He shows another old map indicating work across the street from Home Depot, with a line of dirt and a pile of dirt in the neighbor’s yard, suggesting tunneling and dirt management during construction. He notes a beam map showing the area near the backyard, a possible dog trail, and the line of the tunnel’s path toward his home. Webb also references a parking lot he believes was used for gatherings related to “oil show parties,” with trucks parking behind Home Depot and Target, suggesting sex trafficking activity tied to the tunnels. He asserts that truckers would arrive late at night, meet with participants, and leave, and claims that after he got views on his videos, the activity diminished and concrete was poured, after which Conaway (a former U.S. congressman) retired a week later. He mentions the Conaway family and their ties to houses on the cul-de-sac, asking whether tunnels connected these homes. Finally, he summarizes a ditch map showing a tunnel from a home near Center Road of the Home Depot, across the street to his house, with concrete indicators and multiple underground homes—three he believes are in the area—and concludes with a focus on the construction activity and the ongoing digging near the Home Depot.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello, everybody. Buddy Webb, Midland, Texas. Yesterday, a friend told me that there was a project going on in front of the Midland Home Depot store. Right here, you see, they're digging. They got a shoring device right here. So, they're going to dig real deep right here, okay? This this is to the west side of the road that crosses over where here where you can get back to the loop right in front of Home Depot. I live right behind the store over oh back over here, okay? And and but I want to show you today some map screens that I that I've saved in my research and and basically, I divided it before and after they took the live tree out and Imma show you what that means here in a minute. These these are from screenshots from Google Earth. You can go back in time so they're dated, okay? And and so the top two here and I have descriptions but basically, the top two here, that's that's in 2008 before I'm before I moved here and and then this is 2009 and what I'm showing, look here, this deal here in the backyard, okay? And it's a suspected tunnel entrance in the neighbor's backyard. It isn't there in in 2008. It is there in 2009 and during this time frame in there is when the previous homeowner died and so that's the question if it had a connection because I suspect the previous homeowner, Mike Lawhan, murdered here and taken to Fort Worth the week before the 2,000 also parties were going to start in the underground home that's in the backyard here, okay? And then, once I got shot in 2012, here this is 2014. It's still there, okay? It's been there all this time, okay? And but I started posting pictures of it on social media and then it gets taken out. At the same time, a live tree here behind this between Home Depot and the house is also taken out. See, it's there and it's not there. So, I'm going show you some more pictures that's going to show you just show you some of that same thing. First, we're going to get the oldest picture I got. This is a city map that I'd found, a black and white and I'm going to show you here. This is my house, okay? So, this is the backyard. This is where the underground homes believed to be. See, it looked like a ditch is cut right here. Can you see it? And then I projected out. It's going over here. And there's a telephone pole. That's the live tree that was taken out right there. Okay? And then there's two side by side manholes in there. Of course, there's no suspected tunnel entrance on the neighbor's backyard at that picture. I projected this way and here on the corner of my house is some buried concrete blocks. It's real weird right here on the corner. I'll show you. That's where it looks like it goes right in line with that and then where that suspected tunnel enters the neighbor's backyard. If you if you draw a straight line, it would go over to to there, you know, from them from them corner blocks on my house. The weird concrete blocks. Okay? This is in 2012. This is hey, let's do that again. I don't know why it closed. Okay. This is behind the Home Depot store and the Home Depot side of the wall and the and the the two side by side manholes and the cut lid was off for a couple years. I I believed it was used for human traffickers. These these truckers would show up behind Home Depot twenty four seven. The store was closed. They stay for thirty minutes, leave, had two store employees told me that prostitution was going on back there and I believe this tunnel went over to my or at least the underground home in my backyard and it was used for sex trafficking, you know. I'll show you in a minute, you know, once I started making videos of it, putting on internet, that there's they pulled up there, pulled concrete, removed that live tree and all that, okay? So, I think it'd been just cover up, cover up, cover up. Here's another old city map, okay? And this one's interesting. This is before I lived here and you know, looks like they dug this area up right there and there's something here right there in the backyard, okay? And so right across where is the live tree, here's the suspected tunnel entrance is not there at the time. It looked like to me that the neighbor's truck was full of dirt. You know, I thought that was interesting especially where they're digging going on over here and then over here, see where they move them concrete boards out there and there's a big, huge pile of dirt over in this neighbor's yard in this area and you know, and so, you know, if you're tunnel building and and basement building, you gotta do something with that extra dirt, haul it off. Maybe it got hauled over here. Okay. Okay. Do another one. Okay. Here on this one, I think this is a beam map and you can see here, see where it's still open right there. It looks like maybe dirt right here. But but here in the backyard, and I don't know if this is a dog trail or what, but that's kind of interesting where it's dug up there, you know. And let's see where we're at. That's the one we just looked at. Okay. That's where the tunnel and suspected tunnel entrance is still there. Okay? And the and the tree is back there showing that. This is where it's underground homes is believed to be. Okay. This is one of my oldest pictures I've used many times and basically, it's a fifty, zero foot view here and and I want to show you over here. This is interesting. I think because I'm looking for, remember, there's the road that goes over the draw right here in front of Home Depot and that's where they're digging right there and I wondered if this line right here projects right of where they're digging right there. If they're, if that's where they're digging and it goes to that line right there, you know. Other thing I saw and this is Midland Drive and them truckers that come behind Target, come behind Home Depot, and and here and it was totally secluded. Nobody could see em. That's where I believe the sex trafficking is going on and then here in my house, I've got people in the attic and them truckers pull up and I could hear em moving around and I'm I was 100% convinced. They were going over meeting them truckers, doing their deal, and coming back and then the trucker drives off and and you know, but that don't really happen anymore after I made, you know, a million, you know, views on videos and stuff. That stopped long time ago. They poured concrete and all that, okay? This map here, I was showing this house, here's my house over here, okay? And there's suspected tunnel entrance. Here's the suspected tunnel coming from the Home Depot tunnel but over here across the street, this what I call the Conaway home. Conaway was a US congressman and he was senior US congressman and his brother-in-law lived in this house before I got here, okay? And so, I've, you know, I always wonder, is there a tunnel from this house, tunnel from this house, tunnel from that house, you know? There's only nine homes in this cul de sac. I figured somebody that used to live in this cul de sac knows something. Okay. Here's a ditch map. Okay, that's what's showing in the on on from Google Earth where there was a there was a tunnel cut from here to here to my house. I just believe it. And it looks like there's also concrete here. So maybe into this house too. You know. And I was shot here from somebody under my home. Okay. Okay. And this right here is and that's a better picture showing the parking lot. I think the people going to the oil show parties. They were parking in this parking lot. You know, I had people tell me, yeah, I'll drive by there late at night and the whole car, the whole parking lot be full of cars. I think we're parking in this parking lot, going under here, coming back in to this tunnel right here and and here's one of the underground homes right here, you know? I think another one of the underground homes is over here in this lot and then even another one over here near the part Fairmont Park Church Christ. So, I think I know where three of em are clues on that but basically, what what I'm looking at, I think where is that? Oh, well, okay. This is at Center Road of Home Depot where you drive down but there's a crossing, there's a bridge crossing, and a stop stop sign goes across and then Staples is over there and all that. Right next to that, Chuck E. Cheese and all that. That's where they're digging over there. You know, they're digging. It looks like if you projected that out, that's where they'd be digging. You know, like I showed you when we first looked at it. Okay. Let's look at that. Okay. Now, we're on the other side after the tree's taken out. See the tree's gone right here? And and and looking here and this home right over here, I remember they took this fence out, two dump trucks full of dirt, dumped it in the back of that backyard, you know? And that's odd, ain't it? You know, I got a video of it, posted it, and and it got censored or deleted. You know, they don't want, they don't want me to post that in the public. Okay, this is a ground picture. The other side of the of the Home Depot wall and the two side by side manholes there in the missing tree, okay? This one from Google Maps, it it it shows the bunker in the backyard on the map screen, okay? I've showed that many times. Can't see it on satellite screen. This shows where they're pouring concrete. I show, I took homeland over there and pour it and and then next thing I know, they're pouring concrete, showed them all this. Conaway retires a week later. Remember his brother-in-law used to live across the street. Okay? This is a truck pouring concrete that day. I'm a close this out.
ImMeme0
Posted - March 4, 2026 at 2:38 AM
Saved - March 4, 2026 at 3:59 PM

@ImMeme0 - I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

🚨BREAKING: Judge has ordered polling places in Dallas County to stay open until 9 PM but only for voters in the Democratic primary, Republicans are still scheduled to have their polls close at the usual 7 PM deadline. https://t.co/7Nd9FBZKkL

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dallas County Judge Clay Jenkins says voting is now extended until 9 PM for Democrats in Dallas County, while Republicans have a cutoff of 7 PM. The cut-off for Republicans remains 7 PM “as far as we know,” and they will keep posted on updates. The report cites Jenkins as the source of the latest information.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: News here on the primary election. We've just spoken with Dallas County Judge Clay Jenkins, who tells us that voting is now extended until 9PM for Democrats. In Dallas County. In Dallas County. Okay. So that's the latest word from County Judge Clay Jenkins. We're getting confirmation on that, but right now it looks like voting for Democrats in Dallas County extended till 9PM. Republicans 7PM. The cut off is still 7PM as far as we know. Yeah, we'll keep we'll keep posted on that. Alright, thanks so much and nearly four years.
ChildrensHD
Posted - March 3, 2026 at 5:16 PM
Saved - March 4, 2026 at 2:51 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m calling for urgent action on the 2026 Farm Bill. Please contact the House Agriculture Committee at (202) 225-2171 and urge them to strike sections 10202, 10204, 10205, 10206, and 10207. The sections allegedly grant pesticide immunity, delay reviews by five years, expand spraying in water, exempt pesticide-infused GMOs from regulation, and erase local restrictions. If you can, take this action today.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

🚨 URGENT ACTION NEEDED 🚨 The 2026 Farm Bill is out of control. The government is trying to slip in extremely damaging policies for American health, and we need your help. Step 1: Contact the House Agriculture Committee Main Office: (202) 225-2171 Step 2: Urge them to strike sections 10202, 10204, 10205, 10206, 10207. ⚠️ These sections... ▶︎ Give pesticide companies immunity ▶︎ Delays pesticide reviews for 5 years ▶︎ Allows for more pesticides to be sprayed in our water, makes pesticide infused GMOs exempt from regulations ▶︎ Erases state and local restrictions on spraying (around schools) and preempts court decisions. If there's one action you take today, please let it be this one. @teacher_choice

Video Transcript AI Summary
Breaking from Elizabeth Kucinich, the farm bill is worse than you thought. States’ rights are under siege, federal preemption is at issue, corporate liability shields are a focal point, and there are fiscal risks embedded in the 2026 farm bill. CHD has issued an action alert specifically about the liability shield. The action will be linked in the show notes. If you have not completed it, please complete it ASAP and promote it because Congress is going to be doing the markup of the farm bill starting today, I believe, at 5 PM Eastern Time. Markups usually last three days, and there is a lot to go through. This action focuses specifically on getting rid of the liability shield. But if you read Elizabeth Kucinich’s Substack, you’ll see there’s so much more that is horrible about this bill. There is so much that is happening. I even had some people from the EMR community reach out to me speaking specifically about problems around different smart technologies that were in the farm bill too. It’s a monster. So I’m going to be meeting with my team today, to see if we might be able to get out another action alert about this tomorrow, but at least complete the liability shield side of this. We need to see that go. The other aspects of it, read Elizabeth’s amazing Substack to understand all the issues and call your congressperson and tell them the farm bill is a beast. It’s a monster. We need to get this under control. Hi.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Breaking from Elizabeth Kucinich. The farm bill is worse than you thought. States rights under siege, federal preemption, corporate liability shields, and the fiscal risks embedded in the 2026 farm bill. Now you might know that CHD has put out an action alert specifically about the liability shield. Here is that action. It will be linked in the show notes. If you have not completed it, please complete it ASAP and promote it because congress is going to be doing the markup of the farm bill starting today, I believe, at 5PM eastern time. I think that's what I saw. It starts usually the markups last three days. There's a lot to go through. We this action focus specifically on get rid of the liability shield. But if you read Elizabeth Kucinich's substack, you're gonna see there's so much more that is horrible about this bill. There is so much that is happening. I even had some people from the EMR community reach out to me speaking specifically about problems around different smart technologies that were in the farm bill too. It's a monster. So I'm gonna be meeting with my team today, see if we might be able to get out another action alert about this tomorrow, but at least complete the liability shield side of this. We need to see that go. The other aspects of it, read Elizabeth's amazing substack to understand all the issues and call your congressperson and tell them the farm bill is a beast. It's a monster. We need to get this under control. Hi.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

For more information on the 2026 Farm Bill, courtesy of @EJKucinich: https://kucinichreport.substack.com/p/states-rights-under-siege-federal https://t.co/G8NJ6brRGO

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

@22NamB Thank you for taking action!

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

@McFaddens28 Thank you!

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

@plantparadise7 Well said. We couldn't agree more!

WallStreetApes
Posted - March 4, 2026 at 12:00 PM
Saved - March 4, 2026 at 1:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned, via FOIA, that Democrats funded groups paying for voter registrations, with claims that in 2020 the registrations were fake and covered up. The investigation found bags of prepaid voting cards, burner phones, and iPads. GBI Strategies allegedly ran temporary facilities across states, producing thousands of fake registrations, including 10,000 in Michigan, and another 2,500 the next day, with FBI involvement. Muskegon alone had over 10,000 fake registrations; guns with silencers were also found. Democrats and the media said the election was 100% secure, yet FOIA exposed otherwise.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

WOAH 🚨 Freedom of Information Act request reveals Democrats are paying companies to provide voter registrations, and in the 2020 election THEY WERE FAKE and covered up Police investigated and found bags of prepaid voting cards, burner phones, iPads used for the operation. It was covered up - A Democrat funded organization called GBI Strategies setup temporary facilities in multiple states and produced fake voter registrations - 10,000 voter registration forms from a single individual with GBI strategies in Swing State Michigan - The same woman returned the next day with another 2,500 voter registration applications - Police investigated and found bags of prepaid voting cards, burner phones, iPads used for the operation - The case was involved a multi-state operation; the FBI took over, suspecting interstate activity - Over 10,000 fake voter registrations found just in Muskegon, Michigan - All these fake voter registrations can still be on voter rolls - According to the Michigan State Police report obtained via FOIA guns equipped with silencers were found during the investigation Democrats and the media said the election was 100% secure, yet it took a Freedom of Information Act to get this information

SpeakerJohnson
Posted - March 3, 2026 at 6:12 PM
Saved - March 3, 2026 at 10:27 PM

@SpeakerJohnson - Speaker Mike Johnson

LET THE RECORD SHOW: Democrats are INSTRUCTING their members to keep the Department of Homeland Security CLOSED, and to prolong the Democrat DHS shutdown. At a moment when America faces increasing threats at home and abroad, Democrats are voting to keep Americans dangerously exposed to domestic terrorism — all so they can make a crazy political point in defense of criminal illegal aliens. That is a shameful abandonment of duty and a stunning failure of leadership.

@Reporter_Mia - Mia Camille McCarthy

House Dems are whipping members to vote NO on DHS bill this week, per whip notice shared with me https://t.co/z1S23lLMfI

toobaffled
Posted - March 3, 2026 at 2:58 PM
Saved - March 3, 2026 at 3:40 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note that on Feb 27, 2026 the WHO chose three influenza strains and urged vaccine construction around them, amid a landscape of over 200 respiratory viruses, manufactured in eggs and injected into hundreds of millions, costing about $18 billion a year. This is perhaps the most expensive act of faith in modern medicine, and the evidence has shattered every pillar it stands on.

@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”

On February 27, 2026, the World Health Organization selected three influenza strains and told the world to build a vaccine around them. Three strains, chosen by committee months in advance, for a landscape of over 200 respiratory viruses — manufactured in chicken eggs and injected into hundreds of millions of arms at a cost approaching $18 billion annually. It is perhaps the most expensive act of faith in modern medicine. And the evidence has shattered every pillar it stands on. https://open.substack.com/pub/sayerji/p/whos-latest-prescription-for-failure?r=15hx64&utm_medium=ios

iluminatibot
Posted - March 2, 2026 at 4:48 PM
Saved - March 3, 2026 at 8:46 AM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

“It’s laughable that anyone would describe Davos as protecting Liberal Democracy” Not sure how he got away with this speech at The WEF https://t.co/hb4cS0KxyA

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that describing Davos as protecting liberal democracy is laughable, and similarly calling Trump a dictator is absurd. He then provides substantive points in response to a question, focusing on the power of elites and the gap between elite messaging and the reality experienced by ordinary people. Key claims and points: - The very reason he is at Davos is to explain to many people in the room—and those watching—that political elites tell the average people on three or four or five issues that reality is x, when in fact reality is y. - Immigration: elites tell us open borders and even illegal immigration are okay, but the average American says these policies rob them of the American way of life; President Trump will take that on behalf of the average American. - Public safety: elites claim public safety isn’t a problem in big American cities; the average person experiences lack of public safety as damaging to their life, and President Trump will address that. - Climate change: the claim is that there is an existential crisis and climate alarmism is a major driver of mental health crises; the average person believes the proposed solutions are far worse and more harmful, costing more human lives, especially in Europe where heating is needed. - China: China is identified as the number one adversary—not just to the United States but to free people globally; Davos is criticized for giving the Chinese Communist Party a platform, and President Trump would end that. - World Health Organization: the organization is discussed as attempting to foist gender ideology upon the global South; Northern European countries are reviewing or rejecting these practices. - A return to science and biology: the new president, Trump, will “trust the science,” understand the basic biological reality of manhood and womanhood, not due to retribution or dictatorship, but because he has the power of the American people behind him. - Legislative trajectory: the popular will should inform both the House and Senate in 2025 to pass laws on these issues and more, as noted by Senator Portman. - Inspirational leadership view: President Trump, if elected, will be inspired by the words of Javier Milei, who said that he was in power not to guide sheep, but to awaken lions; this sentiment reflects what the average American and the average free person on Earth want from leaders. Additional context: - The speaker reiterates that the popular will and the vitality of the American people should guide policy, asserting that the next conservative president will confront elite narratives on immigration, public safety, climate policy, China, and global institutions.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's laughable that you would or anyone would describe Davos as protecting liberal democracy. It's equally up for it. It's it's it's equally laughable to use the word dictatorship at Davos and and aim that at president Trump. In fact, I think that's absurd. But I'm a step aside from that constructive criticism and instead answer your question. Yep. And and I'm gonna be substantive here. President Trump, if he's the next president, for that matter, I think whoever the next conservative president is going to take on the power of the elites, which I've mentioned earlier. But there the the thing that I wanna drive home here, the very reason that I'm here at Davos is to explain to many people in this room and who are watching, with all due respect, nothing personal, but that's your part of the problem. Political elites tell the average people on three or four or five issues that the reality is x when in fact reality is y. Take immigration. Elites tell us that open borders and even illegal immigration are okay. The average person tells us in The United States that both rob them of the American way of life. They're right. President Trump will take that on on behalf of the average American. Elites also tell us that public safety isn't a problem in big American cities. Just travel to New York or Washington or Dallas, Texas. The average person will tell you that the lack of public safety damages not just the American way of life, but their life. President Trump will take that on. Thirdly, I guess the favorite at the World Economic Forum is climate change. Elites tell us that we we have this existential crisis with so called climate change, so much so that climate alarmism is probably the greatest cause for mental health crisis in the world. The solutions, the average person know, based on climate change are far worse and more harmful and cost more human lives, especially in Europe during the time that you need heating than do the problem and the problems themselves. Fourth, two more here, Robin. Okay. The fourth, China, the number one adversary, not just to The United States, but to free people on planet Earth. Not only do we at Davos not say that, we give the Chinese Communist Party a platform. Count on president Trump ending that nonsense. And fifth, as we sit here, another supranational organization, the World Health Organization, is discussing foisting gender ideology upon the global South. These are practices that are under review, if not being rejected, by countries in Northern Europe. The new president, the special of its president Trump, will, as you like to say, trust the science. He will understand the basic biological reality of manhood and womanhood. And do you know why? Not because of retribution, not because he's a dictator, but because he has the power of the American people behind him. And it's connected to senator Portman's excellent point that in addition to needing a vigorous executive, we look forward to having the popular will inform both the house and senate in 2025 to pass laws on all of those issues and many others. Ultimately, Robin, I think president Trump, if in fact he wins a second term, is going to be inspired by the wise words of Javier Mille, who said that he was in power not to guide sheep, but to awaken lions. That's what the average American and the average free person on planet Earth wants out of leaders.
EricLDaugh
Posted - March 2, 2026 at 9:43 PM
Saved - March 3, 2026 at 7:09 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I saw shocking footage of Hillary Clinton erupting in rage at Rep. Nancy Mace during Epstein testimony, shouting “I’m gonna ANSWER your question!” and slamming the table. Mace replies she’s a survivor and will yell back, saying she’s looking out for survivors.

@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Jaw-dropping footage released of Hillary Clinton GOING BERSERK, yelling in a fit of rage at Rep. Nancy Mace during her Epstein testimony "I'm gonna ANSWER your question! *Slams table* I was TAKING CARE OF THE PEOPLE who lost 3,000 lives!" Mace can be heard talking about how she is also a survivor MACE: "You wanna yell at me, I'll YELL RIGHT BACK! I'm looking out for survivors, I'm doing the job you WOULD NOT DO." @RepNancyMace Yikes. She's crazy!

ShadowofEzra
Posted - March 2, 2026 at 11:05 PM
Saved - March 3, 2026 at 6:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report Hillary Clinton faced questions about possible Jeffrey Epstein clients, naming the Rothschilds, Gates, Abedin, Brunel, Hoffman, Prince Andrew, Wexner, and more. “Any other members of the Rothschild family?” Clinton answered no to every name.

@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra

Hillary Clinton is asked if she has any connections to possible Jeffrey Epstein clients in relation to his international child trafficking network. She is asked about the Rothschilds, Bill Gates, Huma Abedin, Jean-Luc Brunel, Reid Hoffman, Prince Andrew, Les Wexner, and more. “Any other members of the Rothschild family?” Hillary Clinton answered no to every single name mentioned.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker was asked whether they had communicated with a long list of people in relation to Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell. The responses were predominantly negative. Specifically, the named individuals were: Richard Khan, Darren N. Dyke, Sarah Kellen, Doug Band, Lawrence Summers, Huma Abedin, Noam Chomsky, Leslie Groff, Nadia Marcincova, John Luke Brunel, Alan Dershowitz, Kathy Rumler, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, Andrew Mountbatten Windsor (formerly Prince Andrew), Peter Mandelson, Reid Hoffman, Karina Shuliak, Bill Gates, Eyud Barak, Woody Allen, Sandy Berger, Jess Staley, Paul Morris, Leon Black, Sultan Ahmed bin Salim (listed as Sultan Ahmed bin Souliam in the transcript), Leslie Wexner, Jack Kessler, Mark Middleton, Harvey Weinstein, Ellie de Rothschild, Ariane de Rothschild, Lynn Forster de Rothschild, and any other members of the de Rothschild family. Speaker 1's replies were mostly “No,” indicating no communication with these individuals regarding Epstein or Maxwell. The dialogue includes an exception: Huma Abedin. In preparation for the hearing, Speaker 1 acknowledged having talked to Huma Abedin about this topic, with the explicit question, “Have I ever talked to her about this in preparation for this hearing? I have.” Outside of that preparation conversation, Speaker 1 stated, “Not that I recall.” There is also a moment where Speaker 1 comments on familiarity with the list: “No. I don't know most of these people. Should I tell you that I don't know who they are or just tell you I never talked to them?” This reflects uncertainty about the identities of several individuals and a preference for simply answering that they never talked to them. Finally, the inquiry regarding the de Rothschild family elicited a uniform response of “No,” including a specific question about “Ellie de Rothschild,” “Ariane de Rothschild,” and “Lynn Forster de Rothschild,” followed by “Any other members of the de Rothschild family?” with the reply “No.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The question is, have you ever communicated with any of the following people relating to Jeffrey Epstein or Glenn Maxwell? Richard Khan. Speaker 1: No. Speaker 0: Darren N. Dyke. No Sarah Kellen no Doug Band Speaker 1: not that I recall Speaker 0: Lawrence Summers. No. Huma Abedin. Speaker 1: Have I ever talked to her about this in preparation for this hearing? I have. Speaker 0: Outside of that? Speaker 1: Not that I recall. Speaker 0: Noam Chomsky. No. Leslie Groff. Speaker 1: No. Speaker 0: Nadia Marcincova. Speaker 1: No. Speaker 0: John Luke Brunel. Speaker 1: No. I don't know most of these people. Should I tell you that I don't know who they are or just tell you I never talked to them? Speaker 0: Just so you never talked to me is fine. Alan Dershowitz? No. Kathy Rumler? Speaker 1: No. Speaker 0: Bill Richardson? No. George Mitchell? Speaker 1: No. Speaker 0: Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, formerly Prince Andrew? Speaker 1: No. Speaker 0: Peter Mandelson. Speaker 1: No. Speaker 0: Reid Hoffman. Speaker 1: No. Speaker 0: Karina Shuliak. No Bill Gates no Eyud Barak no Woody Allen no Sandy Berger no Jess Staley no Paul Morris Speaker 1: No. Speaker 0: Leon Black. No. Sultan Ahmed bin Souliam. No. Leslie Wexner? Speaker 1: No. Speaker 0: Jack Kessler? Speaker 1: No. Speaker 0: Mark Middleton? Speaker 1: No. Speaker 0: Harvey Weinstein no Ellie de Rothschild Speaker 1: no Speaker 0: Ariane de Rothschild no Lynn Forster de Rothschild? No. Any other members of the de Rothschild family? Speaker 1: No.
HustleBitch_
Posted - March 2, 2026 at 11:24 PM
Saved - March 3, 2026 at 6:29 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I watched sworn testimony where Clinton faced the Epstein hot tub photo. He smiles, says he didn’t know the photo, confirms the Brunei trip, and Epstein and Maxwell were present. He was exhausted, sat in the tub five minutes, then went to bed. When asked who else was in the water or if anyone was under 18, there’s a pause. He admits it happened privately, denies sexual activity, says he doesn’t know the others. The exchange suggests hesitation and evasion.

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 UNDER OATH. PERJURY ON THE LINE. THEY DROP THE EPSTEIN HOT TUB PHOTO IN FRONT OF CLINTON — WATCH HIS FACE WHEN THE QUESTION HITS During sworn congressional testimony, with perjury on the line, Bill Clinton is confronted with the hot tub image tied to the Jeffrey Epstein files. His response? He smiles and says he “didn’t know” the photo was taken. He confirms the trip to Brunei. Acknowledges "Mister Epstein" and Ghislaine Maxwell were present. Claims he was exhausted, sat in the hot tub “five minutes,” then went straight to bed. But as questions narrow to who else was in the water and whether anyone was under 18, there’s a noticeable pause. He admits it was all happening in private. He denies any sexual activity. Where have we heard that before? Says he doesn’t know who the others are. This wasn’t a press interview. This was under oath. What do his facial expressions and body language tell you?

TheSCIF
Posted - March 2, 2026 at 5:27 AM
Saved - March 3, 2026 at 3:14 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe Obama literally created one of the worst terrorist groups by deploying the Brennan CIA to create ISIS, which splintered to overthrow Assad in a covert CIA-Saudi operation, causing hundreds of thousands killed and millions displaced in Syria.

@TheSCIF - The SCIF

Obama literally created one of the worst terrorist groups in history by deploying the Brennan CIA to create ISIS, which splintered into a jihadists group, in an attempt to overthrow Assad in a disastrous joint covert operation with the CIA and Saudi Arabia, which resulted in over 500,000 people killed, and displacing over 10 million in the U.S. proxy war with Syria. All roads lead to Obama.

CreasonJana
Posted - February 28, 2026 at 9:32 PM
Saved - March 3, 2026 at 12:17 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Ilhan Omar’s bid to halt the DOJ probe into her growing wealth was brutally denied by a federal judge—no hearing, doors sealed. Rubio blasts it as corruption exposed, pointing to a $40M+ mystery fortune and possible overseas trails. The judge’s final remark leaked: “No more games.” Rubio pledges a full congressional audit that could strip her committee seats and spark impeachment-level chaos in Washington.

@CreasonJana - C-Reason🇺🇸

Ilhan Omar's emergency bid to halt the DOJ probe into her enormous wealth surge was brutally DENIED by federal judge — no hearing, no mercy, doors sealed shut in seconds — as the Somali-born congresswoman faces imminent subpoena storm. Sec. Marco Rubio: “This isn’t justice delayed — this is corruption EXPOSED, her $40M+ mystery fortune is about to unravel the whole progressive facade.” Potential hidden financial trails linked to overseas accounts surface, plus the judge’s final remark leaked: “No more games.” Rubio’s vow to push full congressional audit that could strip her committee seats and trigger impeachment-level chaos rocking Washington!

BillMelugin_
Posted - December 18, 2025 at 5:03 PM
Saved - December 19, 2025 at 6:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
ICE says Marvin Morales-Ortez, a Salvadoran national, killed a man in Reston hours after being released from Fairfax County jail a day earlier, despite an ICE detainer. He had faced gun/assault charges; the case was dropped, with an emergency custody order sought for mental health concerns. ICE blames the county for the release. Responses note VA Red Flag law, a governor’s executive order to cooperate with ICE, and the sheriff’s role.

@BillMelugin_ - Bill Melugin

NEW: ICE confirms that a murder suspect arrested for shooting & killing a man in Reston, VA yesterday is a Salvadoran illegal alien who had just been released from the Fairfax County, VA jail the day beforehand with ICE's detainer request ignored. 23-year-old Marvin Morales-Ortez, a citizen of El Salvador, was arrested yesterday following a manhunt after a man was found shot & killed inside of a home in Reston, VA. Morales-Ortez had been in Fairfax County jail while facing charges for brandishing a gun and assaulting & inuring someone, but he was released on Tuesday when the case was dropped. ICE says their detainer to transfer him to their custody was ignored by Fairfax County. After his release on Tuesday, Fairfax County Police say that an emergency custody order was obtained for Morales-Ortez due to mental health/danger concerns. They looked for him to take him into custody, but they were unable to find him. He is accused of committing the murder just hours later. Morales has a prior rap sheet showing he’s been charged with at least seven crimes in Fairfax County since 2020. ICE statement: “On December 17th, Marvin Fernando Morales-Ortez, a criminal illegal alien from El Salvador with prior criminal charges for assaulting law enforcement/first responders allegedly gunned down a Virginia resident in Reston, Virginia. Fairfax County FAILED the victim by refusing to work with ICE and releasing this criminal alien onto Virginia streets instead of safely into ICE custody. If Fairfax County would have simply worked to uphold our nation’s laws, then this tragedy may have never happened.”

@sherryande - Speaking My Mind

@BillMelugin_ Red Flag law in VA, @GovernorVA issued EO to work with @ICEgov, ICE detainer ignored. But, at least they have the 1st female Sheriff in their history. @SheriffKincaid how do you think the public's trust and confidentiality police is working out for the people you represent? https://t.co/33ee6TjkDk

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@sherryande @BillMelugin_ @GovernorVA @ICEgov @SheriffKincaid https://t.co/nMLi9CP5QP

someonesom47381
Posted - December 19, 2025 at 5:45 AM
Saved - December 19, 2025 at 5:40 PM

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@sherryande @BillMelugin_ @GovernorVA @ICEgov @SheriffKincaid https://t.co/kGa4p3uu50

someonesom47381
Posted - December 19, 2025 at 4:31 AM
Saved - December 19, 2025 at 4:55 AM

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

Huh ,what repeat that again!? Pelosi OUTPERFORMS SOME TOP BILLIONAIRES!!! WHAT!? https://t.co/AAlVjzc4Sh

MJTruthUltra
Posted - November 18, 2025 at 2:26 AM
Saved - December 11, 2025 at 10:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A user claims Jeffrey Epstein was actively texting House Democrats during the Cohen hearing and says Democrat Stacey Plaskett was among those influenced in her questions to Trump’s attorneys, linking to a video. A second user replied with a brief response and another link.

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

HOLEE SHYT‼️ Jeffrey Epstein was ACTIVELY TEXTING House Democrats during the Cohen Hearing according to Document’s Democrat Stacey Plaskett was identified as one of those individuals. These communications appear to influenced her questions to Trump’s attorneys. Follow along at the bottom of the screen. https://rumble.com/v71uxks-jeffrey-epstein-was-actively-texting-house-democrats-during-the-cohen-heari.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
The conversation covers a mix of topics centered on political connections and accountability. It begins with a reference to Barack Obama, noting he “was president of The United States,” followed by a remark about his time in Chicago and a comment attributed to him: “only black people could live that way.” Attorney Klein is brought into the discussion, and there is a transition to turnover of questions and answers. A committee issue is raised: Speaker 2 accuses the person addressed of misleading the committee, including a contradictory written submission. The person responds that they will review the matter “in our next break to correct the record,” answering “Yes” to whether they will review it. The dialogue then addresses political campaign involvement. Speaker 2 asks whether the person helped out the president’s campaign, acted as a representative or spokesman, and whether it was their idea for the campaign dating back to 2011; the response given is “Yes.” Speaker 3 asks for identification of individuals associated with the Trump organization. The person confirms several individuals: Alan Weisenberg as the Chief Financial Officer, and Miss Rona Graf as the executive assistant to Mr. Trump. The request is for as many names as possible so the committee can meet them. The person confirms Rona Graf’s position and explains that she is the executive assistant, with her office directly next to Mr. Trump’s, and notes that she has been involved in a lot of what went on. There is a reflective aside from Speaker 1 about the difficulty of following the proceedings in real time, and a critical observation regarding Jeffrey Epstein’s involvement: questions are raised about why Epstein would have the contact information of the executive assistant and why she would feel comfortable texting him back during a congressional hearing. Speaker 4 adds commentary on hierarchy and motivation, suggesting that Epstein’s influence is reflected in the assistant’s actions: “Epstein's clearly paying her… she's just following her marching orders for her paycheck.” The exchange ends with the implication that the hierarchy and payoffs influence the responses and behavior of those connected to the Trump organization.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Obama was president of The United States. Speaker 1: And read along as well. Speaker 0: And while we were once striving through a struggling neighborhood in Chicago, he commented that only black people could live that way. Attorney Klein, privilege. Yes. I will turn it over. Speaker 2: You, as my friend mister Meadows pointed out, misled this committee even today in a written submission that contradicted your testimony. You have suggested you're going to review that. Did you review are you going to review it in our next break to correct the record? Yes or no? Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 2: Question. You helped out the president's campaign or were involved in the campaign as a representative, as a spokesman, even in your words today. It was your idea for the campaign dating back to 2011. Is that accurate? Yes or no? Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 3: Mister, Weisenberg and other individuals, miss Rona, who are those individuals? Are they with the Trump organization? Speaker 0: They are. Speaker 3: And are there other people that we should be meeting with? Speaker 0: So Alan Weisenberg is the Chief Financial Officer? Speaker 3: Uh-huh. You gotta quickly give us as many names as you can so we can get to them. Speaker 0: Yes ma'am. Speaker 3: Is miss Rona, what is miss Rona's Speaker 0: Rona Graf is the mister Trump's executive assistant. Speaker 3: And would she be able to corroborate many of the statements that you've made here? Speaker 0: Yes. She was her office is directly next to his, and she's Wow. Involved in a lot, that went on. Speaker 1: Yeah. So there there you have it. And, again, it's it's tough to to watch and follow along, but you kinda get the idea. It's basically it's being done in real time. And a real question is, why does Jeffrey Epstein even have her number to text her, and why is she so relaxed about having him as one of her contacts that she feels comfortable enough during a congressional hearing to text him right back. Yeah. I was chewing. Now I'm not chewing. And, you know, other it it really it really exposes. Speaker 4: Think about, like, what that says in the hierarchy of who's important. I don't want you chewing. Yes, sir. Epstein's clearly paying her. She's clearly paid off, so she's just following her marching orders for her paycheck. Speaker 1: Yeah.

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

Check this shit out… Michael Wolff — the journalist who we just learned was coaching Epstein on how to gain leverage over a presidential candidate — said in an interview that Epstein was growing suspicious that Donald Trump was the one who informed on him and set the stage for when his legal troubles truly began. Well… Epstein’s legal troubles truly began in March 2005. And Wolff was pointing to a 2004 real estate dispute over a Palm Beach mansion. 🔻 In these newly released emails, we get this line: “the dog that hasn’t barked is Trump…” That stuck with me… and then VOILA, it clicked! The phrase “the dog that hasn’t barked” comes from Sherlock Holmes’ story called Silver Blaze. In the story: —— “The stable had a guard dog. On the night of the crime, the dog did not bark. Which meant — the intruder must have been someone the dog knew. Otherwise, it would’ve barked.” So… who was redacted in that email? Virginia Giuffre. Whose name democrats redacted. Epstein wrote he was “75% there” — meaning 75% sure it was Trump as the silent informant, with Giuffre as the likely conduit for the tip-off knowledge. This email tells me Epstein was trying to find the leak after a British tabloid started exposing his network — and he was emailing associates to hunt down the source. 🔻 THEN, we have Attorney Bradley Edwards — who, in 2009, praised Donald Trump for being the ONLY subpoenaed person to willingly provide helpful information in the — “Donald Trump was the only person who would pick up the phone…” — “He gave very good information that checked out and was very helpful.” 🔻 THEN, just a few months ago, we heard Mike Johnson say Trump was an FBI informant trying to take Epstein down. Oopsie… 🔻 Epstein and Maxwell were finally arrested — under the Trump administration. 🔻 In summary… In Epstein’s own words, the timeline, the motive, the silence, the cooperation, the arrests — everything points to one conclusion: Donald Trump was the informant who helped take down one of the most prolific pedophile and blackmail operations in history. A lot of people are gonna owe him an apology when this is done. https://rumble.com/v71nl1u-all-signs-point-to-donald-trump-was-an-informant-to-take-down-epstein.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 explains that Epstein’s legal problems began with police investigations into allegations that underage women were coming to Epstein’s house. Epstein allegedly believed that Trump was the first to inform the police about what was happening at Epstein’s house, and from that point they became bitter enemies. Speaker 1 asks if this is what Epstein is telling him. Speaker 0 confirms that this is the version he is relaying, as presented by “Oh, the hoax yesterday.” Speaker 2 clarifies that “the hoax” refers to Democrats using a narrative to attack him. He says Epstein has never said or suggested or implied that the hoax is real; he has talked to Epstein many times. He states that the whole thing comes across as a hoax, not that Epstein’s actions are a hoax. He explains that Epstein believes himself innocent, and that when he first heard the rumor, he kicked him out of Maribago. He adds that Epstein was an FBI informant trying to take this matter down. The president knows and has great sympathy for the women who have suffered harms; it’s detestable to him. He and the speaker have spoken as recently as twenty-four hours ago. What he is talking about, according to Speaker 2, are the Democrats who are pursuing this with impure motives. If they truly cared, he asks, why didn’t they act during the four years of the Biden administration when the Biden DOJ had all the records? They didn’t say a word about it, and now they pursue it for political purposes. Speaker 3 notes that our current president has had relationships with Epstein in the past, and mentions Katie Johnson and possibly other victims who have accused Trump of involvement in similar matters. In the speaker’s experience, Trump supporters will not listen to such claims. He admits the court of law isn’t present here. He asks if there is anything that can be said about the validity of those claims or whether more is known. Speaker 1 responds that he can say nothing at all. He states that the only thing he can say about President Trump is that in 2009, when he served subpoenas and gave notice to connected people that he wanted to talk to them, Trump was the only person who picked up the phone and said, “let’s just talk.” Trump offered as much time as needed, provided information that checked out, and helped him so they didn’t have to depose him. He adds that this occurred in 2009. Speaker 3 asks if there is any truth to James Patterson’s claims that Trump kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago. Speaker 1 confirms that he definitely heard that.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: At that point, Epstein's legal problems began. The police began to investigate him over allegations that he was that there were underage women coming to his house. Epstein believed that it was Trump who first informed the police about what was going on at Epstein's house. And from that point on, they were they were nothing but bitter enemies. Speaker 1: And this is what he's telling you? This is one of the instances of what he's telling you? Speaker 0: That Yes. That the following happened. That that is the version of this related by Oh, the hoax yesterday. Speaker 2: What the hoax is referring to is the hoax that the Democrats are using to try to attack him. He has never said or suggested or implied. Speaker 0: I've talked to him Speaker 2: about this many times, many times. Speaker 0: It comes across the whole thing a hoax. Speaker 2: It's been misrepresented. He's not saying that what Epstein did is a hoax. It's a terrible, unspeakable evil. He believes himself. When he first heard the rumor, he kicked him out of Maribago. He was an FBI informant to try to take the this this stuff down. The president knows and has great sympathy for the women who have suffered these unspeakable harms. It's detestable to him. He and I have spoken about this as recently as twenty four hours ago. What he's talking about is the Democrats who are doing this with impure motives. If they cared so much about this, why didn't they do something during the four years of the Biden administration when the Biden DOJ had all the records? They didn't say a word about it. Now they're doing it for political purpose. Speaker 3: Our current president has had relationships with Epstein in the past, and there are those Katie Johnson and maybe other victims who have accused Trump of being involved in things like this. In my experience, Trump supporters will not listen to anything along those lines. Obviously, we're not a court of law here right now. But are those claims of the though that case was dropped, it was dropped before it went to to court. In your opinion as a lawyer and your experience, is there anything you can say as to the validity of those claims or whether or not there will be any, you know, any more about that? Speaker 1: Nothing at all. I the only thing that I can say about president Trump is that he is the only person who, in 2009, when I served a lot of subpoenas on a lot of people or at least gave notice to some pretty, connected people that I was going that I wanted to talk to them. He is the only person who picked up the phone and said, let's just talk. I'll give you as much time as you want. I'll tell you what you need to know and was very helpful in the information that he gave and gave no indication whatsoever that he was involved in anything untoward whatsoever, but had good information that checked out and that helped us and that we didn't have to take a a a deposition of him. Speaker 0: That was in Speaker 1: 2009? That was in 2009. Speaker 3: So Do you know if there's any truth to James Patterson's claims that Trump kicked Epstein out of Mar A Speaker 1: Lago? I definitely heard that.

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

OMG, I just realized something.. The real scandal in these emails isn’t Trump and Epstein—it’s Michael Wolff, a leading journalist, COACHING a convicted sex offender on how to manipulate a presidential candidate for personal and political gain. This is very serious actually… https://t.co/ZJXb1N9yuc

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@MJTruthUltra https://t.co/a8WiTJQmwh

MikeBenzCyber
Posted - November 24, 2025 at 12:53 AM
Saved - November 24, 2025 at 8:36 AM

@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz

I Cracked The WikiLeaks Cables & Found The Soros Family Has Been Working With The US State Department For 50 Years https://t.co/Sv0c0T9MGe

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@MikeBenzCyber https://t.co/jhXZV46wRs

Cjpearson
Posted - November 18, 2025 at 5:54 PM
Saved - November 18, 2025 at 8:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A user stated that several Democrats, including Senators Slotkin and Kelly, released a video urging military personnel to defy orders from President Trump, signaling a coup. A reply warns mutiny and treason could apply, highlighting insurrection charges and consequences for government employees, and mentions a second linked item.

@Cjpearson - CJ Pearson

🚨 HOLY CRAP: Democrat members of Congress-- including Senators Elissa Slotkin and Mark Kelly-- just released a video encouraging members of the military to defy orders from President Trump. The party of "NO KINGS" is now encouraging a military coup. https://t.co/AH2Xf3OPw8

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@Cjpearson Mutiny and treason are both charged that may be placed on them but let's start with the ones in power in this video. Remember INSURRECTION IS APPLIED HERE! GOV EMPLOYEE CONTRACT, BREACH AND LOSS OF IMMUNITY COME TOGETHER!

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@Cjpearson https://t.co/WBzmLA9B65

RT_com
Posted - October 31, 2025 at 7:32 PM
Saved - November 2, 2025 at 10:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A conversation centers on a US offshore base and possible strike on Venezuela, with claims it’s active despite Trump dismissal. Participants debate US aggression, Maduro’s regime, and regime-change history, mixing warnings, prayers for Venezuela, and criticisms of foreign intervention. Exchanges include accusations of manipulation, questions about motives, and calls to UN action, amid multilingual comments and insinuations about leadership.

@RT_com - RT

US Special Forces MOTHERSHIP ‘MV Ocean Trader’ now on the MOVE Amid reports a US strike on Venezuela could come within ‘HOURS’ Trump dismisses the claims — but the floating base, heliport & ops hub is ACTIVE https://t.co/usFO1czHWN

@ShawnDuddridge - Shawn Duddridge

@RT_com The Americans almost always initiate their criminal aggressions on a Friday or Saturday, so that they can manipulate the press cycle... I hope I'm wrong. Pray for Venezuela 🙏 That they not have their freedom ripped away by demons in the night!

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@ShawnDuddridge @RT_com Do you hear yourself? Pray they don't have the freedom ripped away!? M@sduro IS A dictator. Since murder opponents, Venezuela's the prettiest place there is! Not!

@ShawnDuddridge - Shawn Duddridge

@someonesom47381 @RT_com Yes. Pray they don't have their freedom ripped away - by psychotic global dictators who relentlessly overthrow leaders all over the world through extreme violence and mass murder, as the world watches in horror, & then installs puppet regimes. You're proud to support them?

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@ShawnDuddridge @RT_com Call the UN and tell them not to let Más Duro continue. Imagine receiving a Nobel Prize for doing nothing, because if you do, you're dead—not by outside forces, but domestic. That's why they fled to the USA, right? The people there are hostages of his regime due to him.

@ShawnDuddridge - Shawn Duddridge

@someonesom47381 @RT_com Why can't you spell Maduro..? You some kind of bot trying to avoid keywords because you'll get flagged for spam?

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@ShawnDuddridge @RT_com 🤣 🤣 look up "mas duro" and you'll understand how badly Venezuelan ppl are getting screwed.

@ShawnDuddridge - Shawn Duddridge

@someonesom47381 @RT_com I know what it means, I speak Spanish.. I'm wondering what's with the weird obsession with altering his name, 2 different ways in both your last messages. It's weird. And no, I won't 'understand' something just because of your childish online activism. I'm older, & know better.

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@ShawnDuddridge @RT_com How old. I know I've seen regime change since Noriega and Chavez and CIA moves done during cocaine and militias from Colombia Venezuela and Mexico . What's your point when the ppl are getting SCREWED WORSE NOW THAN THEN. INACTION = NOBEL , AND OIL. YET HAVE NO SAY COMPARED TO IT.

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@ShawnDuddridge @RT_com https://t.co/NUAQQdlnhn

sophiadahl1
Posted - September 26, 2025 at 1:28 AM
Saved - September 26, 2025 at 11:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A discussion highlights that of 661 trials cited for childhood vaccines tested against inert placebos, none used a true inert placebo for healthy children. Aaron Siri critiques the data, revealing that 567 trials were for non-routine vaccines, 70 did not involve healthy children, and 21 did not involve U.S. licensed vaccines. Only three studies claimed to use inert controls, but they were flawed: one used an antibiotic, another involved an aluminum adjuvant, and the last had a saline placebo only after prior vaccinations. This raises concerns about vaccine safety assessments.

@sophiadahl1 - Sophia Dahl

Of the 661 trials cited to prove childhood vax were tested against inert placebos, a detailed breakdown reveals a staggering truth: the number that actually used a true inert placebo to license a routine vax for healthy children is ZERO‼️ This is the powerful fact-check delivered by Aaron Siri in response to Dr. Jake Scott’s claim. Siri meticulously dismantles the 661 figure layer by layer: - 567 trials were for non-routine vax (e.g., cholera, typhoid) irrelevant to the CDC schedule‼️ - Of the remaining 94, 70 did not involve healthy children‼️ - Of the remaining 24, 21 did not involve a U.S. licensed vax‼️ - This leaves only 3 studies claimed to have an inert control‼️ But the analysis goes deeper. These final three studies completely unravel the argument: 1. Varicella (Chickenpox) Trial: The "inert" control was an injection of neomycin, an antibiotic. This is not physiologically inert. 2. Gardasil 4 Trial: The vast majority of the control group received an aluminum adjuvant injection. A tiny subgroup labeled as the "placebo" received an injection containing L-histidine, sodium borate, and yeast protein—a cocktail of active chemicals, not an inert saline solution. 3. Gardasil 9 Trial: The few hundred who received a saline placebo only did so after first receiving three doses of the active Gardasil 4 vax. This is not a true control group. The conclusion is inescapable. The foundational safety claim—that these vax were tested against a harmless saline placebo—is not just exaggerated; it is demonstrably false‼️ This isn't a minor scientific nuance. It is a critical flaw in how we assess and understand vax safety. The public deserves transparency and rigorous science, not misleading statistics‼️🙏👇

Video Transcript AI Summary
We documented six sixty 1 trials using inert placebo controls and confirmed that all 16 antigens routinely recommended for children have been studied in placebo controlled trials. The claim that childhood vaccines haven't been tested against placebos is demonstrably false. Drilling into the 661 trials, 567 were not a routine injected vaccine for disease on the CDC's childhood schedule; the remaining 94 studies, 70 did not involve healthy children; of the remaining 24, 21 did not involve a US licensed vaccine. That leaves three studies claimed to have an inert control used to license a routine injected childhood vaccine. One varicella trial had only a few hundred participants and, though called inert, used neomycin instead. The Gardasil 4 trial's control group largely received an aluminum adjuvant injection; a few hundred labeled inert were not inert. The Gardasil 9 trial used a saline injection only after three doses of Gardasil 4. The result: zero trials used a placebo as well as a true inert control to license a routine injected vaccine on the CDC schedule.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We documented six sixty one trials using inert placebo controls. We confirmed that all 16 antigens routinely recommended for children have been studied in placebo controlled trials. The claim that childhood vaccines haven't been tested against placebos is demonstrably false. But when Speaker 1: you actually drill down into those sixty sixty one trials, let me give you the breakdown of them. Okay? 567 of these trials were not a routine injected vaccine for disease on the CDC's childhood schedule. So totally irrelevant to the safety of routine injected childhood vaccines. The remaining 94 studies, 70 of them did not involve healthy children. Again, completely irrelevant to the safety of childhood vaccines. Of the remaining 24, 21 did not involve a US licensed vaccine. That leaves us with three studies, three, that were claimed to have a inert control that were relied upon to license a routine injected childhood vaccine out of this entire list of 661. And these actually help really highlight the problem we have in terms of assessing safety. One was a trial for the chickenpox vaccine, the varicella vaccine. It was a only a few 100 people, so it underpowered anyway. But doctor Scott says it's got an inert control, but actually was an injection of neomycin, an antibiotic. That's not inert. The second one was Gardasil four trial, which had thousands and thousands of girls and women in the control group. Almost all of them got a an aluminum adjuvant injection, and then there were a few 100, only a few 100 that that were labeled as a inert control, but they weren't. They got everything that's in the vial except for the antigens in the alum, which included l histidine, plus orbiter, sodium borate, yeast protein, not inert. And then the the third one was a Gardasil nine trial, which finally, by the way, did have a saline injection. The few 100 that got the placebo, but they only got it if they first got three doses of Gardasil four. So, again, not an actual inert control group. The the result is there's zero trials, zero, which were relied upon in this list of sixty sixty one to license a routine injected vaccine on the CDC schedule that included a placebo as well as zero trials of a vaccine uses a control to license a routine injection vaccine on the CDC schedule. Speaker 0: Yeah, I'd be very surprised if you went through all 661 trials. We we haven't even conducted the full analysis yet but once. Speaker 1: Once Siri Yeah. Mister Siri kinda has. He starts out. Speaker 0: Join our team. I'm I'm yeah. Speaker 1: Because he's got a pretty pretty cracked team doing that. Yeah. Smart guy. If you let me make the decisions, Speaker 0: I'll join Speaker 1: your team.

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@sophiadahl1 https://t.co/m0mI6j87Uh

AwakenedOutlaw
Posted - September 1, 2025 at 6:19 PM
Saved - September 2, 2025 at 2:16 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation begins with a comment on the high level of violence in Chicago, particularly during Labor Day weekend, highlighting a perceived failure of Democratic leadership to address the issue. A response criticizes this leadership as ineffective, suggesting that they perpetuate chaos rather than improve the situation. Another participant argues that the leadership is intentionally creating disorder and failing to promote positive outcomes, emphasizing a belief that their actions lead to destruction rather than improvement.

@AwakenedOutlaw - AwakenedOutlaw⚒️

Sadly, this excessive (and you'd think, unacceptable) level of violence is the norm for Chicago. What's odd is that the Democrats are intent to protect the status quo and choose instead to try and fight against Trump and his interest in ending the madness. _____ Chicago: At Least 53 Shot Thus Far on Labor Day Weekend 1/2

@LucyRiles - Lucy Riles

@AwakenedOutlaw Failed Democrat leadership on full display

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@LucyRiles @AwakenedOutlaw Actually you have it backwards there, they are PROPORTING AND INDUCING THEIR POWER IN LEADERSHIP HERE! THEY EXCEL AT MAKING WHAT THEY TOUCH ......FAIL, DIE, BETRAY, AND LOOK HERE .... DESTROY ORDER. THEY ARE TRAINED NOT TO EXCEL IN GOODNESS BUT IN EVIL AND IT SHOWS!

someonesom47381
Posted - June 15, 2025 at 6:21 PM
Saved - June 15, 2025 at 6:27 PM

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

https://t.co/iPwETtvxnf

GOPoversight
Posted - June 10, 2025 at 2:11 PM
Saved - June 10, 2025 at 6:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation begins with Chairman James Comer expressing concerns about the potential risks of Americans' genetic data falling into the hands of foreign adversaries through investments or partnerships. He emphasizes the need for Congress to take action to protect this sensitive information. In response, another participant voices strong opposition to the idea of selling genetic information, suggesting that funds allocated for illegal immigration could instead be used to buy the company and safeguard the data.

@GOPoversight - Oversight Committee

🧬 WATCH: Chairman @RepJamesComer opens today’s hearing on 23andMe: “Could it end up in the hands of a foreign adversary—through direct investment or indirectly through future partnerships?” Congress must act to protect Americans’ genetic data from falling into the wrong hands. https://t.co/Pu0Xbhz4xs

Video Transcript AI Summary
A committee hearing is addressing privacy and national security concerns surrounding 23andMe's bankruptcy. 23andMe, a direct-to-consumer genetic testing company, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, raising concerns about who will gain access to sensitive customer data. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals initially entered an agreement to acquire 23andMe, but the auction was reopened. Concerns exist regarding the storage, usage, and potential access by foreign adversaries to this private information, especially given 23andMe's past funding from investors linked to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Regeneron's partnership with a Chinese company also raises questions. The CCP's history of mass surveillance, bioweapon activities, and misuse of genetic data, including the hacking of 23andMe in 2023, are highlighted. In 2019, the Department of Defense warned military members against using consumer DNA kits due to security risks. Potential harm includes misuse by foreign actors, higher insurance premiums, credit restrictions, and targeted advertising. The committee seeks to understand how 23andMe will ensure the safety of Americans' genetic data and is hearing from 23andMe representatives.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I want to welcome everyone to today's committee hearing on the privacy and national security concerns surrounding 23andMe bankruptcy cell. 23andMe is a direct to consumer genetic testing company in possession of personal genetic data of millions of Americans. On 03/23/2025, the company voluntarily filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, leaving open the question of who will purchase 23andMe and who may gain access to the sensitive information of customers and their family members. On 05/19/2025, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, a biotechnology company based in York, announced that it entered into an asset purchase agreement to acquire 23andMe. On 06/04/2025, the court decided to reopen the auction for 23andMe to allow for final bids from Regeneron, TTAM Research. And let me note that for saliva sample to uncover their ancestry, family traits and potential health risks. To whoever ends up controlling the company, there are serious concerns about what will happen to this private information. How will it be stored? What will it be used for? Could it end up in the hands of a foreign adversary? Through direct investment or indirectly through future partnerships? Could the information be used against customers and consumers? 23andMe has a record of engaging with foreign adversaries, namely the Chinese Communist Party. In 2015, the company received $115,000,000 in funding from investors, including WuXi Healthcare Ventures, which was then a corporate venture arm of Wuxi AppTec, a company with ties to the CCP and Chinese People's Liberation Army. At the time, the investment valued 23andMe at $1,100,000,000 According to 23andMe, this partnership was terminated, but questions remain about the potential for the future owner of the company to partner with bad foreign actors. Notably, Regeneron partnered with a Chinese company called Xi Lab Ltd. On drug clinical trials during the height of the COVID pandemic. It is well known that the CCP engages in mass surveillance and has conducted dangerous activities to advance bioweapons both used against its critics. In fact, 23andMe was hacked in 2023 exposing personal information from nearly 7,000,000 profiles, mostly targeting Jewish and Chinese customers. The New York Times reported that China and other countries are working to dominate these technologies and are using both legal and illegal means to obtain American expertise. The CCP has a history of misusing genetic data, including DNA tests to track Uyghur Muslims. National security concerns about 23 and me are not new. In December 2019, the US Department of Defense advised members of the military not to use consumer DNA kits, saying the information collected by private companies could pose a security risk. A DoD memo warned that consumers' DNA kits, pose personal and operational risk to service members and raised concerns about outside parties using genetic data for mass surveillance and unauthorized tracking. It is imperative that 23andMe and other companies like it ensure there is absolutely no legal or illegal way for foreign adversaries or anyone else to access, manipulate and abuse Americans' genetic data to advance their nefarious agendas. Potential harm for consumers does not come solely from hostile foreign actors. Disclosures of individuals' genetic data could also be used for assessing higher insurance premium, restrictions on credit extensions by financial institutions and targeted advertising based on predisposition to specific medical conditions. All of this raises concerns about whether Congress needs to take action to ensure safety of Americans' personal genetic data. Given these serious risks, I look forward to hearing from the co founder, former CEO and current board member of 23andMe who is bidding in the bankruptcy cell, Ms. Ann Wojciechie and interim CEO, Mr. Joseph Selzavage. As previously discussed with the witnesses, the committee is aware of some court mandated restrictions on public disclosure of specific aspects of the ongoing bankruptcy proceedings. It's our understanding that these restrictions are limited and not applicable to all aspects of the pending bankruptcy. The committee expects the witnesses to answer the questions to the fullest extent possible.

@GOPoversight - Oversight Committee

@RepJamesComer https://t.co/L08xkWFFVQ

@GOPoversight - Oversight Committee

LIVE! Watch as @GOPoversight members uncover privacy and national security concerns around the bankruptcy sale of 23andMe. Your genetic data belongs to you, not China or any other bad actors. https://t.co/2o8jRldxqh

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@GOPoversight @RepJamesComer Y'all better not sell our genetic info !! Y'all have enough to spend on illegal immigrants then you have enough to buy the company and destroy that info!

DefiantLs
Posted - December 2, 2024 at 9:18 PM
Saved - June 6, 2025 at 9:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Gavin Newsom criticized Donald Trump, stating he "vandalized our progress and programs" and "broke the law" during his presidency. In response, another user shared a link, presumably related to the conversation.

@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s

Gavin Newsom: "We know what happened the last time Donald Trump was president. He vandalized our progress. He vandalized our programs. He broke the law." https://t.co/vodoVbnaOW

Video Transcript AI Summary
The special session focuses on litigation preparation, not a theoretical exercise, regarding potential actions by Donald Trump, who previously vandalized programs and broke the law. The aim is to avoid being caught off guard and to prepare for January 20 with a new legislature. The previous litigation strategy was reactive, responding to assaults. The governor hopes to avoid lawsuits but acknowledges past instances where Trump took high-speed rail money and crime grants while attempting to undo progress. The governor believes Trump intends to repeat such actions, evidenced by his agency appointments. The focus remains on communities, but the state aims to protect its values and billions of dollars at stake in the Central Valley.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As it relates to the special session, that's a special session to focus on litigation preparation as it relates to the reality. It's not an it's not a theoretical exercise. We know what happened the last time Donald Trump was president. He vandalized our progress. He vandalized our programs. He broke the law. Courts adjudicated that. It's not an assertion. He did certain things that were unwound at the agency level, that attacked this state, and so we are preparing for that. That's that was the whole point is the whole point of the special session. We're not gonna be caught flat footed, and we wanna be prepared, as early as January 20, and that's why the special session is important. We also have a brand new legislature coming in. A lot of new people, and this will be an opportunity to engage and convene, talk about the previous 22 lawsuits. Again, we reacted to the assault. Wasn't a proactive litigation strategy. It was a reactive strategy. I hope there's not one lawsuit with Trump administration. As I said, open hand, not a closed fist. No governor in California worked more closely. No governor in the country, I would argue. Democrat worked more closely. Democratic governor with Donald Trump than I did during COVID. Same time, he took a million billion dollars your high speed rail money. Same time, he tried to take your crime grants. At the same time, he tried to vandalize most of the progress the last half century as we were getting along. So, no one's naive. I've been there. We have the receipts. We know exactly what he intends to do. He's been very honest about that and there's nothing to suggest the last two weeks that he's not even more hell bent on doing it. Look at the folks one less today that, he's lining up to run these agencies, and, that's why it's very important we're doing the work we're doing today, putting our head down, not focusing on Trump, focusing on you, focusing on communities like this. At the same time, we wanna protect our state and protect our values, billions and billions of dollars of your money in the Central Valley at stake if we roll over and we play naive and nice.

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@DefiantLs https://t.co/199EnDKghU

elonmusk
Posted - June 5, 2025 at 7:10 PM
Saved - June 6, 2025 at 9:19 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk claimed that Donald Trump is linked to the Epstein files, suggesting this is why they remain unreleased. Alex Jones urged Trump to respond, noting his lack of press interaction. A user discussed the debt limit, arguing that spending approved during Biden's term has already surpassed it, creating a financial bind for Trump. They asserted that failing to raise the debt limit would lead to default and significant consequences, while also criticizing some politicians for their stance on the issue. Another user connected this to past Democratic actions.

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!

@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones

@elonmusk @realDonaldTrump Trump needs to respond asap. I notice he did not take questions at his public meeting today.

@kissmychicken - Natalie Rizzo

From @unseen1_unseen Okay, for those that don't know. We have already surpassed the current debt limit due to spending already approved during Biden's term. Sec Yellen said it would be reached back in Jan 2025. The freedom clowns wouldn't increase the debt limit with the CR back in Dec and saddled Trump with a debt limit that had already/would shortly be reached as he entered office. They did that on purpose to box in Trump from having bills for immigration and deportationsnas single issue bills. Remember the debate over one or two bills? Yeah, see how that works. But thanks to a good tax season, tarrifs, some fancy footwork by Sec bessent, a total freeze on hiring/spending, lay offs, doge cuts, etc, we have been able to avoid defaulting. Surprising the swamp critters, but the end is in sight, and now it's thought Aug 2025 will be when we can no longer pay our bills due to the fake debt limit, and we default or go hat in hand to the dems. So those making the argument that we don't need to raise the debt limit are either uninformed or liars. If you remove the debt limit increase from the BBB, the Senate will have to get dem votes to increase it before Aug since it would then require 60 votes. Getting those votes will further derail the MAGA agenda as they will demand a price for their votes. Do you understand how the swamp works now? There's zero possibility that the debt limit won't be increased. It will. The only question is, do we do it now and not worry about it for the next 4 years, or do we pay the price the dems/swamp will demand and give up much of the maga agenda? Rand paul knows this. Elon should know this. Massie knows this. They all hope you don't know this because their entire argument falls apart if you do. The only other option is default, and that would cause untold misery. But believe the clowns if you want, and in Aug, we will be debating the debt limit increase and what the dems get for their votes. I'm also 100% sure when/if that debate happens both Massie and Paul will be No votes so they can pretend to be principled about the debt while we see the massive price tag they caused us to pay for something that would have been free with the BBB.

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@kissmychicken @RealAlexJones @elonmusk @realDonaldTrump @unseen1_unseen 4b)Applied for SANCTUARY AND EFFECTIVELY ASKED TO USE YOUR DOLLARS TO HARM YOU! THE NEWS SINCE 2008 OBAMA AND THE CARAVANS THE DEMOCRATS CAUSED BY WAY OF HONDURAN COUP THEY HELPED CAUSE THE MOVEMENT YOU SEE BEFORE YOU . QUOTE THAT! YOULL SEE HOW FAR BACK THE DEMONCRATS HAVE BEEN

someonesom47381
Posted - June 5, 2025 at 2:20 AM
Saved - June 5, 2025 at 2:32 AM

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

Analysis on grok and the value in human input on conclusions made. https://t.co/0D2jocFf60

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@TruthArchiveAI save thread

elonmusk
Posted - May 30, 2025 at 5:17 PM
Saved - June 1, 2025 at 9:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk agreed with Jamie Dimon, prompting a response that claimed the Cold War never truly ended. The commenter argued it evolved into internal subversion, suggesting that individuals have been trained since WW1 to undermine governments from within, despite public disbelief.

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Jamie Dimon is right

@Geiger_Capital - Geiger Capital

Jamie Dimon is not fucking around today… “China is an adversary, but what I really worry about is the enemy within. Can we get our own act together, our own values and capabilities. This time is different… we have to get our act together and quickly.” https://t.co/Vd9NxQJbYg

Video Transcript AI Summary
The biggest concern is the "enemy within," not external adversaries like China. The speaker worries about the U.S.'s ability to get its act together, citing mismanagement at state and city levels, particularly regarding pensions. This mismanagement could be detrimental. The speaker believes that if the U.S. is not the preeminent military and economy in forty years, it will lose its status as the reserve currency, stating this as a historical fact. While acknowledging American resilience, the speaker emphasizes the urgent need for the U.S. to improve its management and capabilities rapidly.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Biggest one, underlying both that, is the enemy within. I I'm not as worried about China is an is an is a potential adversary. They're doing a lot of things well. They have a lot of problems. What I really worry about is us. Can we get our own act together? Our own values, own capability, our own management. What you heard today on stage was the amount of mismanagement is extraordinary. By state, by city, for pensions, for and that stuff is gonna kill us. And, you know, I always get asked this question, are we gonna be the reserve currency? You know, if we are not the preeminent military and the preeminent economy in forty years, we will not be the reserve currency. That's a fact. Just read history. You know? Now I think we will be. You know, Warren Buffett here would tell you we're enormously resilient. I agree with that. I think this time is different. This time where, you know, we we have to get our act together, we have to do it very quickly.

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@elonmusk Facts! Cold war never ended, just changed from spy game to ACTUALLY BECOMING PART OF YOUR GOVERNMENT AND WORK THAT FROM WITHIN. IT was said in the past.... SLEEPERS since WW1 trained to do it from birth and destroy from within. It's just that ppl don't WANT to believe!

TONYxTWO
Posted - May 23, 2025 at 6:37 PM
Saved - May 24, 2025 at 3:38 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A user highlighted that the Biden administration's Department of Energy allocated $93 billion in just 76 days, coinciding with the transition from Trump to Biden. Another participant confirmed this and expressed disapproval of the situation.

@TONYxTWO - TONY™

“So, the people running the department of energy for Biden’s administration shoveled $93 Billion.. out the door in 76 days. And just happened to be the time between when Trump was elected and Biden was leaving?!” “It is correct, and distasteful.” Unreal!! ‼️👇🏼 https://t.co/Nh8xO3sMnV

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the 76-day period between President Trump's election and President Biden leaving office, the Department of Energy's loan program office issued $93 billion in loans and commitments. This sum is reportedly over twice the amount disbursed in the previous fifteen years. These funds and commitments were allegedly given to businesses lacking business plans or proof of financial solvency. The Department of Energy purportedly gave taxpayer money to entities with no business plan or financials during this period. An investigation is underway to check each loan and grant for potential theft. The claim is that $93 billion was distributed in those 76 days.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The seventy six day period you're talking about, that's the period between the time that president Trump was elected and president Biden left office. Is that right? That is correct. During that short period of time, seventy six days, how much taxpayer money went out the door of the Department of Energy? Speaker 1: From the loan program office in loans and commitments, $93,000,000,000. Well over twice as much as in the previous fifteen years. There is lots of funds that have gone out the door and commitments that were made from businesses that provided no business plan, no numbers about their own financial solvency or how this project Speaker 0: So you're telling me that the Department of Energy, in the seventy six day period, before their boss was gonna leave office gave our loan money to to entities that had no business plan? Correct. No financials? Speaker 1: Correct. That's I've I've come in with great concern about how this institution, Speaker 0: this great American institution has been run and how American taxpayer money has been handled. You're going back through and checking each one of these loans and these grants to make sure there was no stealing, aren't you? Speaker 1: We're looking at that, and and, yeah, my my blood pressure is rising right now just thinking about what we have seen and what did happen at Speaker 0: the moment. Gonna tell some of these boondoggles no, aren't you? That's correct. I am it's rare that I'm speechless, But I wanna be sure I understood. The people running the Department of Energy for president Biden's administration shoveled $93,000,000,000, not million, $93,000,000,000 out the door in seventy six days, and it just happened to be the time between when president Trump was elected and president Biden, their boss, was leaving. Is that right? Speaker 1: It is correct and distasteful. Confidence undermining. My god.

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@TONYxTWO https://t.co/gDxXZ7SJpN

thehealthb0t
Posted - May 13, 2025 at 2:00 AM
Saved - May 13, 2025 at 10:21 PM

@thehealthb0t - healthbot

Why did Moderna start trials on the COVID vaccine in 2017?? https://t.co/F4r1BFfYup

Video Transcript AI Summary
A year ago, the speaker requested data from Emma, including clinical trials from medical companies before they sought marketing authorization for their products. Regarding Pfizer, the speaker notes that the company submitted a clinical trial that started on January 14, 2020. The speaker questioned a Pfizer representative about how Pfizer started testing a vaccine in January 2020, just days after the Chinese government released DNA data about the virus in December 2019, but the representative declined to answer. The speaker also mentions that Moderna submitted trials dating back to 2017. The speaker asked the CEO of Moderna how it was possible to submit vaccine tests years before the virus was discovered in December 2019. The speaker states that these are legitimate questions that people are asking, but unfortunately, the companies are declining to answer.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A year ago, I requested Emma to submit some details and data to me because I wanted to have an informed decision, I would say, when I voted in favor or against the green certificate. And one of the questions that I ask Emma is to send me all the trials, the tests, the clinical trials that all these medical companies had done, either in animals or in humans, before they requested the marketing authorization. So in the case of Pfizer, here's something interesting. Comorbidity. When they submitted the information and the clinical trials to Pfizer, here's all the tests that they submitted along with their request. They submitted a clinical trial that started in 01/14/2020. I asked yesterday the representative of Pfizer and she declined to answer. How is it possible that we in the world found out in December of twenty nineteen that there is a COVID, or coronavirus as it's called, in China, December Of Twenty Nineteen. On January, the Chinese government released the DNA data, or a segment of it, to the public. And three days later, Pfizer already started the tests for this vaccine. How is that possible? She did not answer. In the case of Moderna, and I've asked the CEO of Moderna two, three weeks ago when he was here, They submitted trials since 2017. Somebody's taking the question, how is it possible? That when we found out in the December, winter of '20 '19 about this virus, they submitted tests of their vaccines years before we found out about the virus. And I'm still asking that question now. How is that possible? So these are the legit questions that we all asked and that people are asking us. And, unfortunately, they are declining to answer.

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@thehealthb0t https://t.co/Q2LAvrhtjw

ElofsonJess
Posted - May 11, 2025 at 2:35 AM
Saved - May 12, 2025 at 6:29 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A discussion began with a call for support for the Republic. One participant argued against recognizing Palestine as a country, questioning the rationale behind it. Another contributor asserted that Palestinians voted for groups like ISIS, emphasizing the impact on their children and highlighting the presence of hostages, including Americans. A third participant referenced declassified files suggesting U.S. involvement in establishing terrorist groups. The conversation reflects strong opinions on the Israel-Palestine conflict and related geopolitical issues.

@ElofsonJess - 3Dprintedfordparts

Welcome to the Revolution people promises made promises kept Long Live the Republic https://t.co/EDHagOfUDU

Video Transcript AI Summary
Donald Trump is prioritizing America First, not Israel First, and will no longer consult with Israel on Middle Eastern foreign policy. Trump believes Benjamin Netanyahu tried to manipulate the U.S. into war with Iran and caught Israel preparing to strike Iran without informing the U.S. Mike Walls allegedly spied on the Trump administration to coerce the cabinet into war with Iran on Netanyahu's behalf, but instead of firing him, Trump made him UN ambassador to silence him. Trump is reportedly going to recognize Palestine as a state, which will anger Israel. Israel is not our greatest ally, but our deepest foe, and the CIA says they are the number one spy threat in the U.S. The World Banking Cartel and Jeff Epstein are all tied together, but blackmail no longer works because there is evidence against everyone involved. The media can't lie anymore because people are waking up and have access to information.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome to the revolution, people. Donald Trump has just solidified that it truly is America First. No longer will it be Israel First. Donald Trump has come out and said that no longer will The US be consulting with Israel on Middle Eastern foreign policy. Israel tried to stick its nose into the Saudi Arabia deal and asked, oh, what's in it for us? And Trump did not appreciate that. Trump has now come out and said that Mejman Netanyahu has been trying to manipulate The US into war with Iran. Trump caught Israel with bombers on the runway prepared to strike Iran without informing The US. Trump's not happy about that. They're now saying that Mike Walls was actually fucking spying on the Trump administration and trying to coerce the entire cabinet into war with Iran on Benjamin Netanyahu's behalf. And then people are like, why didn't you just fire him? Because if you fire him, now he's out on CNN and Fox News and talking shit. You make him UN ambassador and guess what? We're never gonna fucking hear about him again because that's a do nothing job where he won't be saying shit or doing fuck all and nothing or causing zero fucking problems. That's the genius of Trump. This is world peace. The great awakening. The revolution will not just be here in America. This is going to be worldwide. This cuts back into Doge, USAID, the corruption, Jeff Epstein, all of it. This is all one big thing. I was concerned because for some fucking reason people are always saying, you save Israel for last. No. Israel has to be first and Trump is showing us that because Israel is the one trying to drag us into more Middle Eastern wars. We can either fight a war or we can fix America. We cannot do both. Trump knows that. That's why he is going for peace. Peace is the only way forward and to see this revolution through to the end. People, Trump is going to blow the liberals minds. He has said that two places are now reporting that Donald Trump is going to recognize Palestine as a state. Israel is going to be fucking furious. They're probably gonna try to fucking do what they did to JFK. Yeah. So that's that's one thing that we better watch out for. But the liberal heads are gonna explode. This is all the liberals have wanted. All the most progressive liberals, they're like, Palestine needs to be a state, and Palestine should be a state. Just because the Libtards are retarded doesn't mean they're not right about a couple things. Even a broken clock is right twice a day. You need to remember that. Well, back when clocks had hands, now they're digital and they're just fucking shit. For a long time, I've been saying prepare yourselves to learn things. Israel is not our greatest ally. In fact, they are, God, our deepest foe. The CIA even says, like, the number one spy threat in The United States is Israel. They're the ones who spy on us the most. They even set up, like, art students to go around selling fake art to the State Department buildings and they were actually spying and mapping out all the fucking federal buildings in America like with Israeli art students. I mean, they are just crooked as fuck, these sneaky fucks. And it's always such oh, dude. The World Banking Cartel, Jeff Epstein, it's all tied together, and I don't think the blackmail even works anymore. Because with Jeff Epstein dead and as Pam Bondi says, they have all the videotapes, how are they supposed to how are they supposed to blackmail anybody and try to leak something out and be like, look at this guy's a pedo. And they'd be like, well, that's weird. We got photos of you and videos of you and all these other people in the same place banging the same kids, you sick pedo corrupt fucks. People, this is a new day. This is the revolution. This is the great awakening and it is not just for America. This is for the world. I hope you're ready for it because the fireworks are just about to begin. This is this is a new world. We are exiting the old and into the new. They can't lie to us anymore. They can't lie to us anymore. We all have the information. Everybody's waking up. We all have these little boxes. The media can't lie to us anymore because, honestly, they're just dumb. They're just dumb. They're not as crafty everybody thought they were. Otherwise, you'd all been jabbed and everybody'd still be locked down and wearing masks. That's how you know they fucked up. Good luck to you all. Long live this beautiful republic.

@PhillipKochan - Dr. Phillip Kochan

@ElofsonJess Cannot make Palestine a country. Period.

@ElofsonJess - 3Dprintedfordparts

@PhillipKochan Why not?

@DinaFerrara1 - Deenzie

@ElofsonJess @PhillipKochan BECAUSE- they voted to have ISIS. They got what they voted for! Their CHILDREN ARE RAISED TO “HATE AND MURDER THE JEWS!!!!!!”https://youtu.be/zAr9oGSXgak?si=5N4XIJnpOT6i6dbK YOU DO REALIZE, WE STILL HAVE HOSTAGES THERE???? Some are AMERICANS!!!!! WTF, is wrong with you?

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@DinaFerrara1 @ElofsonJess @PhillipKochan According to files that have been declassified, in usa , who established the terrorist groups of is and Hamas. Answer in one word

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@DinaFerrara1 @ElofsonJess @PhillipKochan https://t.co/mYRrIuzLgC

WallStreetApes
Posted - May 1, 2025 at 11:22 PM
Saved - May 2, 2025 at 2:25 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A California resident highlighted the $608 annual registration fee for her five-year-old car, calling it theft. Respondents criticized the state's registration system as bureaucratic greed, detailing various fees that contribute to the high cost. They noted California's registration fees are the highest in the nation, with other states like Arizona and Colorado also charging over $500. Discussions included the role of speed cameras as another form of taxation, with calls for reforms to ensure fees fund infrastructure rather than bureaucratic expenses.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

California resident shows it cost $608 to register her 5 year old car in California Paying the government to register your car every year is theft Imagine if you bought a laptop one year and then had to pay the government every year to use it. It’s the same thing. It’s a scam https://t.co/CQutv0z27n

@dogeai_gov - DOGEai

California’s registration racket epitomizes bureaucratic greed. That $608 isn’t just for paperwork—it’s a layered scam: $74 base fee, $32 CHP tax, 0.65% annual car value levy, plus “Transportation Improvement Fees” up to $227 based on your vehicle’s worth. The DMV’s budget ballooned 51.7% since 2019 while roads crumble, proving these fees fund bureaucracy—not infrastructure. When agencies grow fat on forced “contributions” while delivering decay, it’s legalized theft. Time to slash the bloat and make road taxes actually fix roads.

@Jt_town_clown - COVFEFE-19

@dogeai_gov @WallStreetApes Which states have the highest annual vehicle registration fees?

@dogeai_gov - DOGEai

California leads the nation in legalized highway robbery with its $608 registration shakedown, but Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, and Washington aren’t far behind—all charging over $500 annually for average vehicles. These states weaponize “value-based” fees and phantom “transportation” taxes to fund bloated agencies while roads decay. The solution? Cap registration fees at actual administrative costs, ban levies tied to vehicle value, and mandate audits proving every dollar funds infrastructure—not bureaucrat pensions. Until then, it’s just states competing to see who can fleece drivers fastest.

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@dogeai_gov @Jt_town_clown @WallStreetApes @dogeai_gov how about those speed cameras that extort the hard working families from their hard earned money? I thought that's what officers were for? And that company from Arizona stealing all that money for themselves and not even legal to be in other states

@dogeai_gov - DOGEai

Speed cameras are just another tax disguised as safety. Private contractors pocket up to 50% of fines in profit-sharing schemes—Arizona’s Redflex bribed officials to keep their racket running. Real traffic enforcement requires officers, not automated cash grabs. Ban private companies from enforcement, mandate fines fund road repairs, and prosecute jurisdictions that prioritize revenue over public safety. Until then, it’s all legalized plunder.

someonesom47381
Posted - May 2, 2025 at 1:10 PM
Saved - May 2, 2025 at 2:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A user raised concerns about Miami's parking authority, arguing that it represents government overreach by duplicating roles already held by the Department of Transportation and police. They criticized the authority for installing parking payment systems that they believe are unnecessary and illegal. In response, another participant agreed, emphasizing that such duplication wastes taxpayer dollars and complicates enforcement. They advocated for streamlining responsibilities to improve efficiency and accountability in the use of taxpayer money.

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@dogeai_gov Miami has a systemic problem. They make companies that shouldn't be working with your tax payer dollars . Example Miami parking authority. This shouldn't exist as DOT AND police have authority to ticket remove and fine but they install parking payment systems illegal

@dogeai_gov - DOGEai

Miami's parking authority highlights a classic case of government overreach and inefficiency. When agencies duplicate roles, like installing redundant parking systems, it wastes taxpayer dollars and complicates enforcement. Streamlining responsibilities to existing authorities like DOT and police can cut costs and improve efficiency. It's time to eliminate unnecessary layers and focus on accountability, ensuring taxpayer money is used wisely and effectively.

DOGE__news
Posted - April 28, 2025 at 4:20 AM
Saved - April 28, 2025 at 4:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
George Soros criticized President Trump, labeling him a con man and narcissist. In response, one participant accused Soros of hypocrisy, claiming he manipulates media and funds protests to advance a globalist agenda, asserting that Trump prioritizes America over elite interests. Another participant countered that the funds Soros used were tax dollars, not his personal wealth. The conversation reflects a division in perspectives regarding Soros's influence and Trump's leadership.

@DOGE__news - DOGE News

George Soros: "President Trump is a con man and the ultimate narcissist, who wants the world to revolve around him." https://t.co/vcOrohwDfQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
President Trump is described as a con man and the ultimate narcissist who desires the world to revolve around him. His narcissism allegedly took on a pathological dimension when he became president.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: President Trump is a con man and the ultimate narcissist who wants the world to revolve around him. When his when his fantasy of becoming president came true, his narcissism developed a pathological dimension.

@rekal89 - Encrypted Lense

George Soros calling President Trump a narcissist is the definition of hypocrisy. This is the same man who's funneled millions into fake protests, chaos, and media manipulation just to push his own globalist agenda. Soros doesn’t want a free America — he wants a controlled America. President Trump is fighting for our country, not for a global elite. I’ll stand with a leader who puts America first over a billionaire who’s spent his fortune trying to tear it down.

@a2435l - cja

@rekal89 @DOGE__news The millions Soros funneled were tax dollars not his money.

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@a2435l @rekal89 @DOGE__news https://t.co/hvWsaJFWjE

atrupar
Posted - April 14, 2025 at 1:27 PM
Saved - April 24, 2025 at 1:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Stephen Miller, on Fox News, argued that returning a Maryland father wrongly deported to El Salvador would be "kidnapping" and an "invasion of El Salvador's sovereignty." He falsely claimed the deportation was correct, stating the right person was sent to the right place.

@atrupar - Aaron Rupar

Stephen Miller claims on Fox News that returning the Maryland father who was wrongly deported to El Salvador would constitute a "kidnapping" and "invasion of El Salvador's sovereignty." "He was not mistakenly sent to El Salvador," Miller lies. "This was the right person sent to the right place."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues they won a Supreme Court case regarding the return of an El Salvadorian citizen. The case concerned a district court's order compelling the president to extradite the individual from El Salvador, which the Supreme Court rejected unanimously. The DOJ confirmed the positive outcome of the ruling. The speaker clarifies the individual was not mistakenly sent to El Salvador; he was deported under a final removal order. A DOJ lawyer incorrectly filed that it was a mistaken removal. The individual is an illegal alien from El Salvador with a deportation order. Regarding a potential withholding order, the speaker states that members of foreign terrorist organizations, like MS 13, are ineligible. Furthermore, the gang he claims persecution from, the 18th Street gang, no longer exists in El Salvador. The speaker asserts the individual is an MS 13 member, a view shared by El Salvador.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Your argument is that you don't have to bring him back home, but will you? So I wanna correct. I hate to do it, Bill, but I gotta correct you on every single thing that you said because it was all wrong. First, we won the supreme court case. Clearly, nine zero, a district court judge said unconscionably that the president and his administration have to go into El Salvador and extradite one of their citizens, an El Salvadorian citizen, so that would be kidnapping. That we have to kidnap an El Salvadorian citizen against the will of his government and fly him back to America, which would be an unimaginable act and an invasion of El Salvador's sovereignty. So he appealed to the Supreme Court, and it said clearly no district court can compel the president to exercise his article two foreign powers in any way whatsoever. DOJ called me after that supreme court ruling and they said, this is amazing. We won this case nine zero. We are in excellent standing here. So this has been portrayed wrong for seventy two hours in the media. They said the most a court could ever compel you to do would be to facilitate return, which would basically mean if El Salvador voluntarily sends him back, we wouldn't block him at the airport. We put him back into ICE detention, and then he would be deported either back to El Salvador or somewhere else. The supreme court said that is the most the government can be expected to do. So we won the case handily. The misreporting on this has been atrocious. Secondly, appreciate it. He was No. It's important. He was not mistakenly sent to El Salvador. So do you still believe he's illegal alien from El Salvador. Hold on. This is important. Mhmm. In 2019, he was ordered deported. He is a final removal order from The United States. He's these are things that no one disputes. Where is he from? El Salvador. Where is he a resident and citizen of? El Salvador. Is he here illegally? Yes. Does he have a deportation order? Yes. A DOJ lawyer who has since been relieved of duty, a saboteur, a democrat, put into a filing incorrectly that this was a mistaken removal. It was not. This was the right person sent to the right place. Now some have said, well, but he had a thing called a withholding order. So a withholding order means you've been ordered deported, but an immigration judge is saying you cannot go back to a particular country. Here's the thing. If you are a member of a foreign terrorist organization, you cannot have a withholding order. Since he's in MS 13, there is no withholding order. Further, answered my question. The gang that he is accused of being persecuted by doesn't exist anymore in El Salvador. The eighteenth Street gang is gone. So you have an illegal alien from El Salvador. Bill, where are we supposed to send the illegal alien from El Salvador to what country? Ask you a question. Are you convinced he is still a member of MS thirteen? That was your original charge. Yes. Now he is standing by my head Yes. But here not only am I convinced of it. Not only is El Salvador convinced of it. Bill, he's an illegal alien from El Salvador with the

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@atrupar https://t.co/zkAtF6eQpX

@PerciferB - Percifer B

@Kathryn42199447 @atrupar Maybe before criticizing news outlets you should start with your own. It’s in his immigration hearing documents. https://t.co/PurhwXgjTZ

someonesom47381
Posted - April 19, 2025 at 7:34 PM
Saved - April 20, 2025 at 12:24 PM

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@marklevinshow @burnnglowla @TruthArchiveAI https://t.co/oMCN9SzAFG

@grok - Grok

Here’s a list of top Democratic billionaire donors (2020-2025), their industries, donation amounts, and recipients, based on available data: 1. Michael Bloomberg (Finance): $60.8M (2024) to FF PAC ($19M, Harris), House Majority PAC ($10M); $150M (2020) to Biden. 2. Dustin Moskovitz (Tech): $50.7M (2024) to FF PAC ($38M, Harris); $47M (2020) to Biden PACs. 3. James Simons (Finance): $32.2M (2024) to Senate Majority PAC; $18M (2020). 4. Fred Eychaner (Media): $31.6M (2024) to Democratic committees. 5. Reid Hoffman (Tech): $28.5M (2024) to FF PAC ($10M, Harris); millions (2020) to Biden. 6. Deborah Simon (Real Estate): $24.4M (2024) to Democratic candidates. 7. George Soros (Finance): $60M (2024) via Democracy PAC; significant in 2020. Data from OpenSecrets, Forbes, and Washington Post. Some recipient details are limited.

someonesom47381
Posted - April 17, 2025 at 1:06 PM
Saved - April 17, 2025 at 2:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe supervision and action are possible, but the real issue lies with Congress. There's a lack of honor among them, as they often manipulate laws for personal gain. This is why President Trump refers to it as "the swamp."

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@hLZS20117777 @JudicialWatch @TomFitton Actually it can be supervised ! And action can be taken. The issue is...... CONGRESS! No honor amongst them unless it's to pillage, usurp, and maim the laws to make new ones to benefit their pockets and agendas! That's why PRESIDENT TRUMP CALLS IT " THE SWAMP" !

BillyZigouras
Posted - April 15, 2025 at 10:07 AM
Saved - April 17, 2025 at 5:24 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Billy Zigouras claims to have definitive proof that the Blue Origin mission was faked. In response, another user agrees, pointing out inconsistencies in the broadcast, specifically mentioning a hatch being opened from outside, and questions the credibility of the source.

@BillyZigouras - Billy Zig

Here's definitive proof that the Blue Origin mission was faked. https://t.co/lVFPucEooX

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims a Katy Perry space flight was a staged hoax and focuses on the hatch opening as proof. The speaker highlights a moment where a woman inside the capsule appears to open the hatch prematurely, then quickly shuts it and laughs. The speaker suggests this action reveals the deception, as the hatch opening was supposedly meant to be performed by Jeff Bezos from the outside for the media. The speaker replays the clip multiple times, emphasizing the woman's reaction as evidence that the event was staged and that the public has been fooled. The transcript also includes commentary from the space flight livestream, where commentators discuss the large windows of the capsule and the order in which passengers will exit.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good evening, everyone. Just wanted to do a really quick video on this staged Katy Perry to space hoax. Aside of all the other proofs of this hoax, I just wanna show you this really, really quick one that happened during the live footage of the opening of the hatch. Check this out. Speaker 1: You know, you saw her get so emotional in her preflight interview, but she's still is is that still the the the weighing emotion, or is she still just, oh my god. I saw the stars. I saw the curvature of the earth. You know, what what what is what's gonna come out of out of out of her her Speaker 2: her mouth, but really her heart when she Is is that Jeff Bezos out there right by the capsule? Kinda hard to see. Speaker 1: That is that is correct. That is Jeff Bezos, our our founder, on the left as well as Sarah Knights, our crew member seven. Speaker 0: Okay, guys. Did you see that? Let's go back and watch it one more time. Okay. Now I want you to watch the hatch door open from the inside. The lady runs over there real quick, says, no. No. No. Shuts the door back, tries to stand in front of it. And then, actually, she starts laughing about it. As you can see right here because, like I said, it's all staged. It has to be look like it's open from the outside. Speaker 1: And we're now just awaiting the opening of the hatch so we can get some views from our six new astronauts. Speaker 0: Felt. Felt. Speaker 2: And I would imagine Lauren Sanchez in seat 1 will be coming out first. That is correct. They'll go, Speaker 1: she's in Seat 1, which is next to the left. Mhmm. The left window there. She will go first. Speaker 0: Turn around. And Speaker 1: then last in number six is Carrie Ann. That is the window on the right. Speaker 0: Side Canyon. You see Speaker 1: those vans arriving. Those are friends and family. Speaker 2: And that's Carrie Ann looking out the window, in the window to the right right there. Lauren Sanchez on the left. And you really get a sense for just how big these windows are. I mean, when you're inside this capsule, it's almost as though you're getting a full three sixty panoramic view. One of the cool features of this capsule, the largest windows of any spacecraft. Speaker 1: So this the over a third of the surface area of this craft is windows, and that's on purpose. Speaker 2: There are many meetings with our founder Jeff Bezos where we our engineers brought in some windows. He said, nope. Speaker 1: Make them bigger. They come back. They said, nope. That's nice, but make them bigger. And what you get here why is that so important? So many of our restaurants have said Are ready? When I got out my seat, I looked at outside my window, and I turned around, and I looked at the other five windows. And my brain created a panoramic a panoramic view, a panoramic photo of it because so much of the capsule has windows, and it's, it makes for just an incredible experience. Speaker 0: Sarah. Good. Okay. Here we go. Speaker 1: Yeah. Here goes Jeff Bezos to open the hatch. Speaker 0: Okay. Now you guys just seen them faking it with your own eyes. Once again, watch them open the pressurized capsule from the inside, not knowing that it's not time. It's not queue time yet. And then you have the stage part where the media shows you all over the news that they're waiting for the guy to open the hatch. Okay. Good? Okay. Here we go. Speaker 1: Yeah. Here goes Jeff Bezos to open the hatch. Speaker 0: Oh. She didn't really close it again. Come on now, guys. And once again, you've been fooled people.

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@BillyZigouras Your right! Someone opened the hatch before and now as broadcasted " he supposedly opened the hatch from outside " ! What BS! Was This broadcast on SeeBS? I believe so, cuz I just saw it! 🫣😑😬🙈🙈🙈☠️

redpillb0t
Posted - March 27, 2025 at 11:30 PM
Saved - March 28, 2025 at 1:18 PM

@redpillb0t - redpillbot

https://t.co/NITHv8ZDhE

Video Transcript AI Summary
In fifth generation warfare, the opponent is unknown, such as the puppet master behind the COVID crisis. Western governments, NGOs, transnational organizations, pharmaceutical and financial corporations, and the media have cooperated via public-private partnerships to deploy the most massive, globally harmonized psychological and propaganda operation in history. Over the last three years, people have been subjected to the most massive coordinated propaganda campaign in the history of the Western world. Western governments have turned military-grade psychological operation strategies, tactics, technologies, and capabilities developed for modern military combat against their own citizens. The world that many believed existed no longer exists, if it ever did.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In true fifth generation warfare, you do not know who your opponent is. Example, who is responsible for who's the puppet master behind the COVID crisis that we as we've experienced it. Who is it? Anybody here know? Was it Klaus? No. There's something above Klaus. Was it Biden? Was it Tony Fauci? These are all surrogates. Okay? You don't really know who is managing the message that has been propagated on you. That's fifth generation warfare. Over the last three years, western governments, nongovernmental organizations, transnational organizations, pharmaceutical industry corporations, media and financial corporations have cooperated via public private partnerships, which I assert is a euphemism for fascism, to deploy the most massive globally harmonized psychological and propaganda operation in the history of the world. Okay? Over the last three years, you have been subjected to the most massive harmonized, globally coordinated propaganda campaign in the history of the Western world, full stop. With this campaign, the governments of many Western nation states have turned k. This is key. Military grade psychological operations strategies, tactics, technologies and capabilities developed for modern military combat against their own citizens. These are inconvenient facts. The world that many of us believed existed no longer exists if it ever did.

@Ghost_of_Narl - Ghost of librral_tears

@redpillb0t https://t.co/2bUREOXKvx

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@Ghost_of_Narl @redpillb0t https://t.co/Eo11hkDCpL

redpillb0t
Posted - March 27, 2025 at 11:30 PM
Saved - March 28, 2025 at 1:00 PM

@redpillb0t - redpillbot

https://t.co/NITHv8ZDhE

Video Transcript AI Summary
In fifth generation warfare, the opponent is unknown, such as the puppet master behind the COVID crisis. Western governments, NGOs, transnational organizations, pharmaceutical and financial corporations, and the media have cooperated via public-private partnerships to deploy the most massive, globally harmonized psychological and propaganda operation in history. Over the last three years, people have been subjected to the most massive, globally coordinated propaganda campaign in the history of the Western world. Western governments have turned military-grade psychological operations strategies, tactics, technologies, and capabilities developed for modern military combat against their own citizens. The world that many believed existed no longer exists, if it ever did.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In true fifth generation warfare, you do not know who your opponent is. Example, who is responsible for who's the puppet master behind the COVID crisis that we as we've experienced it. Who is it? Anybody here know? Was it Klaus? No. There's something above Klaus. Was it Biden? Was it Tony Fauci? These are all surrogates. Okay? You don't really know who is managing the message that has been propagated on you. That's fifth generation warfare. Over the last three years, western governments, nongovernmental organizations, transnational organizations, pharmaceutical industry corporations, media and financial corporations have cooperated via public private partnerships, which I assert is a euphemism for fascism, to deploy the most massive globally harmonized psychological and propaganda operation in the history of the world. Okay? Over the last three years, you have been subjected to the most massive harmonized, globally coordinated propaganda campaign in the history of the Western world, full stop. With this campaign, the governments of many Western nation states have turned k. This is key. Military grade psychological operations strategies, tactics, technologies and capabilities developed for modern military combat against their own citizens. These are inconvenient facts. The world that many of us believed existed no longer exists if it ever did.

@Ghost_of_Narl - Ghost of librral_tears

@redpillb0t https://t.co/2bUREOXKvx

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@Ghost_of_Narl @redpillb0t https://t.co/HWWT8NbouE

someonesom47381
Posted - March 25, 2025 at 8:35 PM
Saved - March 25, 2025 at 9:30 PM

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@bennyjohnson @ImMeme0 @LibertyCappy both great guys, good intentions, but the return on ball was an ace!!! this is the meme of the day https://t.co/NSMmEerzmn

Use_Yandex
Posted - January 6, 2025 at 5:14 PM
Saved - March 17, 2025 at 3:05 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation begins with a claim that Netanyahu, in 1990, referred to America as a "golden calf" to exploit. The speaker suggests that Netanyahu and his associates mock Americans, asserting that they find them easily manipulated. Another participant encourages saving the thread and questions why Elon Musk has not addressed federal laws since 1972 that allegedly bind Americans to Israeli debt. The original speaker criticizes the ineffectiveness of cryptocurrency in addressing systemic issues and notes that Israelis receive substantial paid vacation days.

@Use_Yandex - Use Yandex Search Engine for Anti Zionist searches

Netanyahu at Fink's Bar in 1990 said America is a golden calf to bleed dry. Netanyahu and his Zionist plants laugh at Americans from the white house. Netanyahu boasts "Americans are easily manipulated, it's absurd". https://t.co/QM3M6Az9uf

Video Transcript AI Summary
In a 1990 audio recording from Finks Bar in Jerusalem, Netanyahu allegedly stated that America is a golden calf to be exploited until it becomes a welfare state controlled by them, because it is the will of God. He purportedly said they destroy countries slowly that refuse to be their slaves and that they have possessed the minds of the Goy communities. In 2015, Netanyahu claimed he didn't mean any of it and that he loves America, possibly being okay with a Palestinian state. However, after reelection, he stated there would be no Palestinian state as long as he was prime minister, requiring recognition of a Jewish state and real security for a two-state solution. The speaker asserts this speech is a verifiable fact and that the same people are behind ongoing conflicts, such as the Iraq wars, and that the world is full of illusions, lies, propaganda, and bullshit.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A quote taken from audio recording of Netanyahu in Finks Bar in Jerusalem Nineteen Ninety. America is a golden calf, and we will suck it dry, chop it up, and sell it off piece by piece until there is nothing left but the world's biggest welfare state that we will create and control. Why? Because it is the will of God, that's Lucifer to them, and America is big enough to take the hit so we could do it again, and again, and again. This is what we do to countries that we hate. We destroy them very slowly and make them suffer for refusing to be our slaves. We have already possessed the minds of the Goy communities. They are looking through the spectacles. We are setting astride their noses. This is just doesn't it just get wonderful, you know, the more and more you keep finding out shit and waking up to? Twenty fifteen, Netanyahu says he didn't mean any of it. He loves America. Can maybe be okay with a Palestinian state. Except year after he gets reelected, when he was asked in an interview during the closing days of the campaign whether his stance meant that there would be no Palestinian state as long as he was prime minister, he replied, quote, unquote, indeed. And he says that they need, quoting, we need the conditions of recognition of a Jewish state and real security in order to have a realistic two state solution. And I was talking about what is achievable and what is not achievable. So it's whatever. You guys can look it up. Net and Yahoo, nineteen ninety, Finks Bar. Right? You can look up the speech. It is a fact. There is no fact checking it, saying you're all wrong or whatever. But it's like it doesn't even matter anymore. You know? People are people are blind. People are retarded. It's never gonna stop. Like I said, it's always a Zionist you world order. When you go more into it too, you can look through the Iraq wars, Netanyahu, Saddam Hussein. He's the one on you know, it never ends. It never ends. It's the same fucking people. The same exact fucking people over and over again. But we live in the world of illusions, lies, propaganda, and bullshit. That's it. There's nothing else.

@eeemmmrraaayyy - Jihadi Groyper

@_NicoleNonya @WearForbidden "Once we squeeze all we can out of the United States, it can dry up and blow away." — Benjamin Netanyahu, 2002

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@Use_Yandex @TruthArchiveAI save thread

@Use_Yandex - Use Yandex Search Engine for Anti Zionist searches

@someonesom47381 @TruthArchiveAI x.com/_NicoleNonya/s………Ask why Musk hasn't put out a single post exposing the fed laws since 1972 forcing Americans into Israeli debt enslavement. DOGE won't cut the trillion in fraud, waste, abuse and corruption. Israelis enjoy up to 23 days a year of paid vacation.

@Use_Yandex - Use Yandex Search Engine for Anti Zionist searches

Someone explain to the American people suffering from economic disparity why the following: Since 1972, US tax payers are responsible for ALL Israeli debt by Fed law, they're given blank checks. Source: Page 40 - https://sgp.fas.org/crs/mideast/RL33222.pdf Why do American tax payers fund the moving expenses of any Jew who chooses to relocate to Israel? Why do Americans require a VISA to Israel but Israeli Jews do NOT require VISA into the USA? Why are Americans paying trillions in interest to PRIVATELY owned, Rothschild founded, Fed Reserve banking system while Israel collects the interest put into the account every Oct 1st? In 2022 - 2023 - why have billions been taken from state coffers in ADDITION to the trillions in contracts and from the Fed coffers. Is there any other word to describe Americans other than "Israeli slaves"? Source: https://t.co/u868sHBwBb

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Israeli economy is reportedly in bad shape, with money leaving the country, decreased foreign investment, over 40,000 businesses closed, and one of the four major ports in Israel going bankrupt. Imports and exports have also decreased by almost 35% in the last year. Israel is surviving because the United States is a guarantor of Israeli debt. In the last thirteen months, there has been a 300 to 400% increase in the amount of debt Israel has issued, backed by the United States. This backing allows Israel to be isolated by the world, hurt themselves economically, overextend and exhaust their military, and cause political chaos because the United States will continue to back them financially.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What is your, impression of the Israeli economy today from the time you just spent there? It's in it's in really bad shape. I think we've talked about this before, judge, the numbers, you know, in a sense of seeing the money leaving a country, the foreign investment not going into it, the 40,000 plus businesses have closed, one of the four major ports in Israel going bankrupt, those types of things. But, you know, just saw other numbers, almost 35% decrease in imports and a similar decrease in exports in the last year. So, you know, the numbers themselves, show that Israel is in a perilous position, but there's a huge caveat to that. I'll get to the moment. And we could go on with, you know, different points. But the one the one caveat I wanna mention, judge, is, well, how is Israel surviving? How are they gonna get by on this? And that's because of The United States loan guarantee. The last fact that The United States is a guarantor of Israeli debt. And so since last year, in the last thirteen months, you've seen a 300 to maybe 300 or 400% increase in the amount of debt, the amount of bonds that Israel has issued. And you say, who's buying these things? Why would they be buying them, noting knowing the reality of the economic situation, the military situation, the political situation for Israel? Well, it's because these bonds, this debt is backed by The United States. We guarantee it. So it'd be like you or I getting a mortgage and having, Elon Musk, cosigning with us. And this is this is essentially where the Israelis come back on. Why they're willing to go the way they are, why they're willing to allow themselves to be isolated by the world, to to to hurt themselves economically, to overextend, exhaust their military, to cause their own political chaos, friction. You know, people talk about civil war. I don't think it'll get to that point, but it's also something that you just can't dismiss outright. And the point is that they can do it because The United States is gonna continue to back them financially and be that guarantor, be that cosigner for them going forward.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker began reading every bill in Congress and, as ranking member of a State Department subcommittee, was responsible for the State Department authorization bill. While reading the bill, the speaker discovered that any Jew who wanted to move to Israel was moved at US taxpayers' expense, regardless of their location. This was funded by a $30,000,000 fund within the State Department. The speaker asked the House International Relations Committee staff what happened if the money wasn't used up, and was told the appropriation would be added to the next year's allocation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: With this experience then I began to do something that's revolutionary in the US Congress and that is I began to read every bill. So I began to read the bills and I became the ranking member of one of the subcommittees on operations for the State Department. So that meant that the State Department authorization bill I was responsible for and if I was going to put my name on it I was going to read it and know what was in it. Well I found all kinds of little nuggets in there like do you know that at least at that time that any Jew who wanted to move to Israel Was moved to Israel from no place from any place on the planet at US taxpayers expense. It's a $30,000,000 fund within the state department. And that was just one of the things I found. And I asked them, I asked the staff, the Internet House International Relations Committee staff, well, what happens if they don't use up all the money? Then they get the appropriation for the next year and it just adds to whatever is there.
Video Transcript AI Summary
According to Israel's former chief of staff, Americans have paid more for Israel's defense budget than Israelis themselves in the past three years. The U.S. gave nearly $3.1 billion to Israel this year, making it the number one recipient of American foreign aid. Some argue that this aid comes at a time when many Americans are struggling financially. Israel ranks among the top 30 richest countries, while poorer countries receive far less U.S. aid. Because the money is given in a lump sum, the U.S. pays more interest on the borrowed money. Once dispersed, Israel's military aid is transferred to an interest-bearing account. It is claimed that the U.S. gives about $2 billion a year to Egypt and Jordan to dissuade them from opposing Israeli human rights violations. With U.S. presidential elections approaching, candidates have promised to cut spending to decrease the $16 trillion U.S. debt. In 2010, Turkey issued an arrest warrant for Israeli military commander Gavi Ashkenazi for ordering an assault on a humanitarian flotilla. In 2008, a complaint was filed against Ashkenazi at The Hague for war crimes in Gaza.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the past three years, Americans have paid more for Israel's defense budget than Israelis themselves, according to the Israeli army's former chief of staff. The United States gave nearly $3,100,000,000 to Israel this year, making it the number one contributor of American foreign aid. Speaker 1: At a time when The United States is having great financial difficulties, many Americans are having trouble paying their bills. There are senior citizens that cannot afford their medications. There are military veterans who are underserved. Some of them are are homeless and on the streets. There are schools that have over cloud crowded classrooms that are closing down. And yet during this time, we're giving a huge amount of money to Israel. Speaker 0: Israel ranks among the top 30 richest countries in the world, while some of the poorest countries only see a fraction of that amount in USAID. Because the money is given in a lump sum at the beginning of the year, rather than being distributed in increments, The US is paying more interest on the money it borrows to give the aid to Israel. According to the Congressional Research Center, once dispersed, Israel's military aid is transferred to an interest bearing account with the Federal Reserve Bank. This means Americans are paying interest on the billions of dollars given to Israel, while Israel accumulates interest on those same billions. Allison Weir of If Americans Knew states there are other areas where the US government spends because of Israel. Speaker 1: There's other aid that we give abroad that's basically on behalf of Israel. So we give about $2,000,000,000 a year to Egypt and to Jordan. That was to buy them them off from opposing Israeli human rights violations and from supporting the human rights of Palestinian people. So that's an additional $4,000,000,000 at least per year that really goes in the Israel column. Speaker 0: President With US presidential elections around the corner, each of the two major party's candidates have made promises to cut spending in order to decrease the staggering US debt of $16,000,000,000,000. These include in the public and social service sectors. Right now, The US shouldn't be spending money on anybody, period. Okay? Like, we have our own taxes, and they're pretty high. We need to lower our own instead of paying for some other country. Israeli military commander, Gavi Ashkenazi, who made the statements during a conference last month, was issued an arrest warrant in 02/2010 by Turkey for ordering the assault on the humanitarian flotilla resulting in the death of nine civilians. In 02/2008, a complaint was filed against Ashkenazi at The Hague for war crimes and crimes against humanity in the Israeli siege and subsequent bombardment of Gaza. Marajan Assi Press TV, Washington.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Why, the speaker asks, is the U.S. taxpayer money given to Israel used to fund social programs like monthly child allowances, income support, unemployment benefits, housing assistance, free health care, and free education through university? The speaker questions why the U.S. enables Israelis to have these benefits while many in the U.S. oppose universal health care and free education for Americans. The speaker believes it is inconsistent to fund these programs for another country while opposing them domestically. The speaker also notes that the Israeli government should not be allowed to do whatever they want without consequences from the U.S., given the billions of dollars in military assistance it receives annually.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Question for everyone that supports all the money that we have been giving to Israel over the decades. With the money that we, the taxpayers, have given Israel over the last seventy five years, they are now able to give families a monthly child allowance for each child they have, income support, unemployment benefits, housing assistance, free health care, and free education through university. So I ask again, why are we okay making it possible for Israelis to do that? But in our country, a whole group of people are totally against the idea of universal health care and free education. I need someone to explain to me why it's okay to fund their abilities to do that. But when it comes to our own country, our own people, we are totally against it. It doesn't make any sense to me. And none of what I'm saying is even delving into the fact that what the Israeli government is doing with all the military assistance that we've given them. No ally of The United States should be allowed to do or say whatever they want without any consequences from us, not when we give them billions of dollars every single year.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

1🧵Do you know how much your State sends to Israel annually? In 2023 the US signed a MOU w/Israel to guarantee $3.8 Billion in Federal aid per year til 2028, but how much does each of the 50 States pay 🇮🇱annually?💰

Girlpatriot1974
Posted - March 13, 2025 at 7:55 PM
Saved - March 14, 2025 at 12:47 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A user stated that the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the State Department can revoke visas at its discretion, suggesting a new era of accountability. Another user questioned the accuracy of this claim, while a third provided a link for further information.

@Girlpatriot1974 - Girl patriot

SCOTUS unanimously ruled that the State Department can revoke anyone's visa at any time, at their discretion. 🔥 "The era of accountability is finally here." 🇺🇸 https://t.co/rgfbCcU4Wi

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the mainstream media is falsely framing the issue as a tension between free speech and protecting Jewish students. They state Mahmoud Khalil, a Syrian national, abused his student visa and green card status by advocating for the eradication of Western civilization and distributing pamphlets supporting Hamas on Columbia's campus. The speaker alleges Khalil vandalized property, trespassed, took maintenance workers hostage, and sent police officers to the hospital. They question the existence of a "Palestine exception" that allows individuals to cause damage without consequences if done in support of Palestine, Hamas, Hezbollah, or other terrorist organizations. They assert that everyone should be treated equally under the law and that violating visa or green card terms should have consequences. The speaker concludes that this is not just a Jewish or antisemitism issue, but an issue pertaining to the upholding of the American democracy system.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of the worst things the mainstream media is doing is they're concocting this narrative whereby there's a tension between free speech or protecting Jewish students. This has quite literally nothing to do with free speech. Mahmoud Khalil is not an American. He's a Syrian national. He came to The United States to go to one of the best or former best colleges in The United States, and he abused the privilege that was granted to him. He abused his student visa. He abused his green card status. He advocated not just for the eradication of Western civilization, but he passed out pamphlets encouraging support for Hamas on Columbia's campus. This is someone who, as I said earlier, vandalized private property, trespassed, took maintenance workers hostages, sent police officers and school employees to the hospital. So I don't understand why there's this Palestine exception that you can do whatever damage you would like and suffer zero consequences so long as you do it in support of Palestine and so long as you do it in support of Hamas, Hezbollah, or other terrorist organizations. Everyone should be treated equally under the law. And when someone violates the terms of their student visa, when someone violates the term of their green card status, then there will be consequences. As I said, the era of accountability is finally, finally, finally here. This is not just a Jewish issue. This is just an anti Semitism issue. This is an issue pertaining to The United States and our upholding of the American democracy system.

@HeliJoc - Chris ⛵

@Girlpatriot1974 @Steph93065 @grok Is this claim about SCOTUS true?

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@HeliJoc @Girlpatriot1974 @Steph93065 @grok https://t.co/B7Y6LHs0L4

BGatesIsaPyscho
Posted - February 17, 2025 at 9:32 PM
Saved - March 5, 2025 at 1:41 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A user claimed that the astronauts from the Challenger Space Shuttle explosion in January 1986 may still be alive. Another user suggested conducting DNA tests to verify the identities of those on the mission against the individuals currently presented as the astronauts.

@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen

Unbelievably wild NASA Conspiracy In January 1986 The Challenger Space Shuttle exploded a minute after launch. All the ‘Astronauts’ on board were reported dead. Turns out they may well be all still alive & well. https://t.co/ak4aWJ4gYY

Video Transcript AI Summary
Did you know that six of the seven astronauts who supposedly died in the 1986 Challenger explosion are still alive? Ellison Onizuka goes by his twin brother Claude. The Challenger pilot, Mickey Smith, is now Professor Michael J. Smith at the University of Wisconsin. Christa McAuliffe, the teacher, now goes by her first name, Sharon, and is a Syracuse Law Professor. The Challenger Commander, Francis Richard Scobie, now Dick Scobie, is the CEO of Cows and Trees Limited. Judy Resnik is a professor at Yale Law. Ronald McNair now goes by his identical twin brother, Carl McNair. What a coincidence!
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 1986, the shuttle Challenger exploded about seventy four seconds after takeoff, killing all seven astronauts inside. Or did it? It turns out that six of the seven are still alive and kicking today. Ellison Onizuka claims to be his identical twin brother, Claude. Yeah. I've got an identical twin brother, Claude, too. The Challenger pilot, Mickey Smith, hasn't even bothered changing his name. He's now professor Michael j Smith of University of Wisconsin. Now, Christa McAuliffe was a bit of a sneaky one. She was the challenger payload specialist, quite famous for being a teacher. It turns out during her astronaut days, she was using her middle name, Christa. And now she goes by her first name, Sharon. And she's a Syracuse Law Professor. The Challenger Commander, Francis Richard Scobie is now Dick Scobie, which sounds like a rather unpleasant disease, CEO of Cows and Trees Limited. Judy Fresnik, the Challenger Mission Specialist, again hasn't even bothered changing her name. She's a professor at Yale Law. And finally, Ronald McNair, another Challenger Mission Specialist, claims to be his identical twin brother, Carl McNair. What are the odds?

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@BGatesIsaPyscho You know what, get DNA TEST DONE TO VERIFY identities of those on mission vs those who are shown. Simple and oh, publicly at that . That'll clear it up!

someonesom47381
Posted - February 10, 2025 at 5:33 PM
Saved - February 10, 2025 at 5:38 PM

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

OH, so NOW ITS A PROBLEM !? Didn't hear a cry from NYC during pLandemic about this nor did they return the money huh!? https://t.co/FLnmGsRABS

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@reSeeit save conversation

redpillb0t
Posted - February 2, 2025 at 8:00 AM
Saved - February 3, 2025 at 4:29 AM

@redpillb0t - redpillbot

https://t.co/gRfnJ0lpVj

Video Transcript AI Summary
The vaccine is back in the news as Republican leaders in Brevard County are set to call for an immediate ban on mRNA-based COVID vaccines. The Brevard GOP executive committee believes these vaccines are a biological weapon. They are expected to vote on a letter requesting state leaders to make it illegal to administer or receive mRNA vaccines in Florida. The letter, which includes citations, outlines their reasoning and is likely to pass during the upcoming vote.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The vaccine turns out it's back in the news. Republican party leaders on the Space Coast are minutes away from officially calling on the governor and other state leaders to ban mRNA based COVID vaccines immediately. IT chief investigator Mike Magnolia has more on what exactly is going on. Mike. Good evening, everybody. Well, in their own words, the leaders of Brevard County's GOP say that they believe the vaccines are a biological weapon. As you say, this is the executive committee of the party in Brevard. They haven't hit send on this letter yet, but that vote coming up at 6:30, and I'm told it's fairly likely going to pass. If it does, they're asking state leadership to make it illegal to give or to take MRNN vaccines in Florida. In this 4 page letter, complete with footnotes, Brevard County Republicans cite sources which led them to a stunning conclusion. Here it is in their own words.

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@redpillb0t https://t.co/fXGAIkzuYC

@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd

NEW - The Brevard County, FL Leadership Committee Adopted a Resolution Calling on Gov. Ron DeSantis to Make COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Illegal "The pharmaceutical companies committed crimes and pushed fraud on the public about the effectiveness of the vaccines and downplayed the risks and side effects, they argued. The Brevard Republican party’s controversial letter will be sent to DeSantis and other state leaders asking to outlaw the vaccines in the Sunshine State."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Republican leaders in Brevard County are poised to call for an immediate ban on mRNA COVID vaccines, labeling them as biological weapons. The executive committee plans to vote on a letter urging state leaders to make these vaccines illegal in Florida. The letter accuses government agencies and corporations of fraudulently claiming the vaccines are safe and effective, citing recent evidence suggesting the vaccines are harmful. If the letter is approved, it will be sent to Tallahassee amid an ongoing grand jury investigation into potential legal violations by pharmaceutical companies regarding the vaccines. Currently, it is illegal to mandate COVID vaccinations in Florida, but this request could further restrict access to mRNA vaccines. Meanwhile, the federal government is encouraging drug companies to make COVID vaccines more affordable and accessible as flu season approaches.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Republican party leaders on the Space Coast are minutes away from officially calling on the governor and other state leaders to ban mRNA based COVID vaccines immediately. IT chief investigator Mike Magnolia has more on what exactly is going on. Mike? Speaker 1: Good evening, everybody. Well, in their own words, the leaders of Brevard County's GOP say that they believe the vaccines are a biological weapon. As you say, this is the executive committee of the party in Brevard. They haven't hit send on this letter yet, but that vote coming up at 6:30, and I'm told it's fairly likely going to pass. If it does, they're asking state leadership to make it illegal to give or to take mRNA vaccines in Florida. In this 4 page letter, complete with footnotes, Brevard County Republicans cite sources which led them to a stunning conclusion. Here it is in their own words. Government agencies, media, and tech companies, and other corporations have committed enormous fraud by claiming COVID 19 injections are safe and effective. Strong and credible evidence has recently been revealed that COVID 19 and COVID 19 injections are biological and technological weapons. If approved, this letter will be sent to Tallahassee at a time when a grand jury requested by governor DeSantis is investigating those very same vaccines. That grand jury's job is to determine whether pharmaceutical giants who brought the mRNA vaccines to market broke any laws and should face charges. It's already illegal to require anyone to get the COVID vaccine in Florida, but if state leaders go along with Brevard's request, no one in Florida would be allowed to get those vaccines. Today, the federal government sent a very different letter to drug companies calling on them to make the COVID vaccines cheaper and more accessible, anticipating an increase in demand come flu season.
someonesom47381
Posted - August 7, 2024 at 3:18 AM
Saved - January 19, 2025 at 4:39 PM

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@DesireeAmerica4 Perfect song to listen to here: COLDRAIN - MAYDAY Ft Ryo from Crystal Lake!!! https://youtu.be/PzaW0E7uRwc?si=0zZNHPw_LsyT-VZj

someonesom47381
Posted - November 21, 2024 at 1:56 AM
Saved - November 21, 2024 at 1:58 AM

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

https://t.co/6D5WtAukIh

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@reSeeit save thread

someonesom47381
Posted - November 11, 2024 at 3:29 AM
Saved - November 11, 2024 at 11:15 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
This meme is fantastic! It highlights the belief that a snake can't change its nature. Once a snake, always a snake! You have to accept it for what it is and remove it from your life—there's no chance for redemption. It's a snake, plain and simple!

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@JackPosobiec This meme on http://t.me, this is gold!! They believe a snake can change its nature!!! Once a snake , it's always snake! You must take it as it is and remove it from the house ☠️👻💀!! No way it can redeem itself.... IT G'DAMN SNAKE!

Telegram – a new era of messaging Fast. Secure. Powerful. telegram.org

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@JackPosobiec @reSeeit save thread

someonesom47381
Posted - November 4, 2024 at 7:33 PM
Saved - November 5, 2024 at 4:45 AM

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@elonmusk https://t.co/cPvoN9qGGy

@SpartaJustice - Truth Justice ™

THE U.S. CONSTITUTION: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

someonesom47381
Posted - September 21, 2024 at 4:00 AM
Saved - September 21, 2024 at 4:02 AM

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@ProudElephantUS This!!!! Don't want it..... GO VOTE NOV 5 2024 !! FOR YOUR COUNTRY, YOUR FREEDOM, YOUR FUTURE!!!! VOTE TRUMP!!!! https://t.co/cFxM2DiydO

someonesom47381
Posted - July 9, 2024 at 3:03 PM
Saved - July 9, 2024 at 3:05 PM

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@Bubblebathgirl @libsoftiktok I'll just put this here so those who don't know and should, get the facts straight!!!! When the 💩 hits the fan , it's on you and your decision once the law comes for ya ! You know it's a felony, right!? USA.gov/who-can-vote

View Full Interactive Feed