@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Mega Thread: VAERS You’ve probably noticed that anytime someone brings up the VAERS reports that are off the charts post injection, they are immediately dismissed as fake reports that have not been verified and the usual go to is “correlation doesn’t imply causation”.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
It’s a convenient way to dismiss legitimate safety concerns without having to do any critical thinking on the matter.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
So I wanted to see what iI could find about the VAERS process. Sure anyone can submit a report and that is the point, its a passive pharmacovigilance system designed to alert the CDC and FDA if there is a pattern of safety signals.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
My question was, what happens to the reports of Severe Adverse Events?
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Skeptics would have you believe that every report submitted is just added to the pile and thats because anyone can submit a report they cannot be trusted, because in theory they could be fake.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
As if a legion of anti-vax conspiracy theorists are typing up fake reports to inflate the numbers to further their own diabolical agenda, which of course is to bring back every infection disease of the past, because, well, just because.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) was set up in 1990 as a part of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and is ran jointly by the FDA and CDC. However they do hire contractors to operate the database and review reports.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Whoever files the report is liable for it and if it is found that it has been falsified, it is punishable by imprisonment. This screen shots are right from the website.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
So they do review reports submitted and if they look to be obviously fabricated they remove them but its more thorough than that.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Frederick Varricchio, formerly of the FDA, Division of Epidemiology, Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research had this to say about serious reports entered into the system.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“At the FDA, serious reports are reviewed by a physician within 24 hours of data entry. Serious reports are classified by the US Code for Federal Regulations as those which report a death, hospitalization, life-threatening illness,…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
prolongation of hospitalization, permanent disability, or some other event which may reasonably lead to hospitalization, permanent disability or life threatening illness.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Based on the judgment of the reviewing physician, any report may be selected for immediate, initial follow up. Reporters of serious adverse events receive a letter (or email now) acknowledging receipt of the report, and follow-up letters are sent 60 days and 1 year after receipt
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
of the initial report. This 60-day letter requests information on the resolution of the adverse event and any key information that was missing from the original report.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Most follow-up is carried out by the contractor’s staff of nurses, who request pertinent medical records and administer prepared questionnaires for some predetermined conditions. The FDA physician may sometimes personally conduct further inquiry in a focused manner.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Due to the severity of the event, 100% of domestic death reports receive follow-up by the contractor’s staff.” “Follow-up activities may involve FDA field offices, CDC or other government agencies. State health departments are intimately involved in immunization programs and…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
often receive reports of possible vaccine adverse events. Such reports are then transmitted to VAERS. In exceptional cases, a state health department may have a role in a follow-up activity.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Source: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1586/14760584.4.4.445
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
So despite the talking points that are constantly trotted out to discredit VAERS, reports of SAE’s are reviewed and a determination is made whether to allow it to remain or remove it based on a clinicians assessment.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Even though, based on what we are seeing now on VAERS, the system has worked as intended in the past…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Several investigations based on VAERS data have uncovered previously unrecognized problems that may occur in vaccine recipients, including: rare life-threatening thrombocytopenia after measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination,hair loss after hepatitus B vaccination,…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
serious injuries resulting from vaccine-induced syncope or fainting, and identification of the low risk of convulsions following receipt of DTP and measles-containing vaccines”. https://biotech.law.lsu.edu/cases/vaccines/vaersce.pdf
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Here are a couple slides and a quote from the FDA I found that break down who reports on average and the workflow that generally occurs depending on the classification of the event. These are from 2010 so the reporting demographics may differ somewhat now.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
I provide this for further insight into the importance placed on VAERS by FDA and CDC.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“The effectiveness of a national post-marketing surveillance program is directly dependent on the active participation of health professionals.Despite the limitations of spontaneous reports,FDA’s program for vaccine surveillance provides vital information of clinical importance.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
So as of 2010, 83% of reports were from either the manufacturer, a health care provider, or a state provider of immunizations. So unless the officials who submitted these are anti-vax zealots I highly doubt the percentage of false reports are anywhere near what skeptics will…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
have you believe. Keep in mind the 20% of SAE’s were all subject to review and follow up so they were deemed legitimate. This doesn’t mean all of them can be directly attribute to the vaccine but it does mean they were taken seriously by CDC and FDA.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
So if a given adverse event is being reported more frequently than would be expected according to the background rate, it should trigger an investigation. Here is the method CDC uses to determine causality of an SAE following immunization, straight from the CDC’s own website.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
•The health problem occurs during a plausible time period following vaccination. •The adverse event corresponds to adverse events previously associated with the vaccine.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
•The event is consistent with a specific clinical syndrome where association with vaccination has strong biologic plausibility (e.g., anaphylaxis) or where the syndrome is known to occur following the natural disease.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
•A laboratory result confirms the association (e.g., isolation of vaccine-strain varicella virus from skin lesions of a patient with rash). •The event recurs with re-administration of the vaccine in the same patient.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
•A controlled clinical trial or epidemiologic study shows greater risk of a specific adverse event among vaccinated versus unvaccinated groups. •A finding linking an adverse event to a vaccine has been confirmed by other studies.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
CDC and the FDA use four main systems to monitor the safety of vaccines in use: the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), the Post-licensure Rapid Immunization Safety Monitoring System (PRISM), and..
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) project. Again, vaccine manufacturers are required to report all adverse events that come to their attention. Up until recently the average number of SAE’s was around 30K per year. In late 2020 this began to change dramatically.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
In the seven-month period from Dec. 14, 2020, to July 9, 2021, VAERS reported 463,457 adverse vaccination events, meaning deaths and injuries.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
At 463,457 events, of which 10,991 were deaths, any drug or procedure in the past resulting in this level of harm would by now have been discontinued and banned by the FDA.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
VAERS reports require patient information, the identity of the person submitting the form, a health provider’s contact information, which vaccine(s) were given, a description of the adverse event,..
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
the result or outcome of the event, and any other adverse events the patient might have had from previous vaccines. Again, the reporting party is held legally responsible and both the FDA and the CDC review all VAERS reports and can issue alerts to the public.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
In fact the system was already used successfully to identify several safety signals related to COVID-19 vaccines, including Guillain–Barré Syndrome, thrombosis with thrombocytopenia following the Johnson & Johnson/Janssen COVID-19 vaccine,..
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
and myocarditis and anaphylaxis following the Pfizer–BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines as reported by the FDA. The safety signals garnered little if any serious reporting from the media though.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The 2011 Lazarus Report The report entitled “Electronic Support for Public Health–Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (ESP:VAERS)” looked at how good VAERS is at identifying adverse events and found.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.” Fewer than 1% Researchers followed more than 376,452 vaccinated subjects for three years, and monitored all adverse drug events while recording the frequency of provider reporting.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The researchers found that adverse drug events, in general, were common but extremely underreported. So if this is true, you do the math on actual numbers that remain unreported.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
As I said VAERS isn’t the only system used to look for safety signals. V-Safe is another database managed and monitored by the CDC. It’s a voluntary “after vaccination health checker” deployed to collect data on those who got the COVID injection.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The CDC created v-safe, a smartphone-based program, to collect health assessments after Covid-19 vaccination. Anyone in the United States can enroll in V-Safe, using their smartphone, after receiving any dose of COVID-19 vaccine
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
During the first week after each dose, V-Safe will send you a daily text message asking for details on your health and well-being. After that, check-ins are sent out on an intermittent basis. It’s a pretty solid system to detect safety signals. If action is taken on said signal.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Unfortunately as you shall see, the CDC for some reason that is beyond me has been sitting on the mountain of data generated via V-Safe post covid injection and to take it a step further has refused to release the data to the public for review.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Luckily ICAN, a non-profit doing tremendous work around transparency in our government successfully sue the CDC and they were forced to provide the data to ICAN. Here is what was discovered.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
-Of the 10 million people enrolled in V-Safe, 7.7% (770,000 people) required medical care after getting the shot and 25% (2.5 million people) missed work or school or suffered a serious side effect that affected their day-to-day life.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
-The V-Safe data also shows a massive immune reaction signal. Four million people — 40% — reported joint pain. Two million, or 20%, reported “moderate” joint pain and 400,000, 4%, classified the pain as “severe”.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
ICAN’s legal team sued the CDC twice leading to a court order requiring release of the data. ICAN has taken the CDC’s official raw data and created a dashboard interface which allows users to graphically view the 10 million health entries obtained by ICAN.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
You can access an interactive dashboard created by them via the link below. Truly amazing work on their part. Again they had to sue the CDC twice for this data, an agency we pay for that apparently doesn’t believe in transparency. https://icandecide.org/v-safe-data/
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The question that remains, why would they refuse to release this data we have a right to? You can view a video by a gentleman named Albert Benavides an RCM expert, data analyst and auditor, i which he provides a tour and overview of how to use the dashboard here:
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
https://rumble.com/v1mrc1q-the-eagles-ican-v-safe-review.htm
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
It should also be noted the CDC also stopped promoting use of V-Safe around May 2021. Now why would that be? The information that could have been collected beyond May 2021 would have been extremely important to assess safety would it not?
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The findings in these databases have never been brought forward during any of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) meetings or the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) meetings,..
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
at which members have repeatedly voted to authorize the jabs to people of all ages, including infants and pregnant women.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The CDC uses a type of analysis known as Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) PRR involves comparing the incidence of a specific adverse event after a specific vaccine to the incidence after all other vaccines. A signal is triggered when three thresholds are met,..
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
according to the CDC: a PRR of at least two, a chi-squared statistic of at least four, and three or more cases of the event following receipt of the vaccine being analyzed. Chi-squared tests are a form of statistical analysis used to examine data.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“The results obtained by The Epoch Times via a FOIA request show a CDC analysis was conducted on adverse events reported from Dec. 14, 2020, to July 29, 2022 show that there are hundreds of adverse events (AEs) that meet the definition, including serious conditions such as…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
blood clotting in the lungs, intermenstrual bleeding, a lack of oxygen to the heart, and even death. The high numbers, particularly the chi-squared figures, concerned experts.” Again why aren’t these results made publicly available? A FOIA process shouldn’t have to be undertaken
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
For many of the events, “the chi-squared is so high that, from a Bayesian perspective, the probability that the true rate of the AE of the COVID vaccines is not higher than that of the non-COVID vaccines is essentially zero,”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Norman Fenton, a professor of risk management at Queen Mary University of London, told The Epoch Times in an email after running the numbers through a Bayesian model.” CDC analysis was conducted on adverse events reported from Dec. 14, 2020, to July 29, 2022
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“We know that the signal for myocarditis is associated with something that is caused by the mRNA vaccines, so it’s more than reasonable to say that anything with a signal larger than myocarditis/pericarditis should be taken seriously and investigated.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Josh Guetzkow, an Israeli professor who trained in statistics at Princeton University and has been studying VAERS data during the pandemic, told The Epoch Times” https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/v-safe-database-confirms-covid-jab-hazards_4803341.html?utm_source=ai_recommender&utm_medium=a_bot_1_a
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
So next time you are gaslit about the dangers of the vaccines or the unreliable nature of VAERS just know, you’re right to be concerned. Some very powerful interests have been aligned and extremely well funded to make you think all is well in OZ..
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
but if you look behind the curtain, the wizard is nothing more than a greedy bureaucrat trying desperately trying to fool you with smoke and mirrors.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Finally, here are the VAERS numbers as of today. Each number represents a human being who has either lost their life or has been disabled having their life turned upside because informed consent was never given properly.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
I am not saying everything can be correlated to the injection but where are the CDC and FDA on this? Have they conducted follow up as they are mandated to do on all of the following SAE’s reported?
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Have they unequivocally determined that none of the 33K deaths reported are attributable? Well, I think you know the answer to those questions don’t you.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Here are some other threads I’ve done below 👇🏻 The Vaccines 💉 The Approval of The mRNA injections for children 💉 Masks 😷 & Lockdowns 🔒 Thanks for reading, give me a follow if you find this information value.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Here is another study I found. Yes it’s in preprint but it lines up with other studies conducted on VAERS but this one has a focus on COVID vaccines. From October 2021: “COVID vaccination and age-stratified all-cause mortality risk” https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Spiro-Pantazatos/publication/355581860_COVID_vaccination_and_age-stratified_all-cause_mortality_risk/links/62f4510079550d6d1c718978/COVID-vaccination-and-age-stratified-all-cause-mortality-risk.pdf?origin=publication_detail
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Comparing our estimate with the CDC-reported VMR (0.002%) suggests VAERS deaths are underreported by a factor of 20, consistent with known VAERS under-ascertainment bias.“
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Comparing our age-stratified VMRs with published age-stratified coronavirus infection fatality rates suggests the risks of COVID vaccines and boosters outweigh the benefits in children, young adults, & older adults with low occupational risk or previous coronavirus exposure”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Our findings raise important questions about current COVID mass vaccination strategies and warrant further investigation and review.” Indeed they do.
@YakkStack - Sheldon Yakiwchuk
Holy Shit. You're going to want to see this! This is actually horrifying. Health Canada just updated it's Adverse Events to the COVID Jabs, showing 57,436 Adverse Events and 11, 231 Serious Injuries. This is an increase of 2,291 AEs, 325 Serious, over the Previous Update from May 26, 2023. During this time, there were 938 COVID associated mortalities. Compare that to the rate of injections and you'll see that these "rare and serious" Adverse Events, aren't looking so rare anymore. More than 2x as many vaccine injuries as COVID deaths. More than 1/3 of AEs to COVID Mortalities were LIFE ALTERING ADVERSE EVENTS.
@bambkb - Kevin - WE THE PEOPLE❤️ - DAD🦁 🐉 🔥
🚨🚨🚨Australian Senator @SenatorRennick 🇦🇺 is one of the few politicians that’s actually fighting for humanity’s rights and accountability for the #Covid #Vaccines - Listen to him go OFF with some FACTS!!!!!👇🔥 “Here we are at the end of 2022 with 20 million people #Vaccinated and over 10 million people still catching #Covid!? What ever happened to protecting you?! Instead of answering that question, the government/TGA just removes all the data from the website and stops counting!?” “140 000 #Vaccine injuries and excess deaths were at 8700 + people in 2022!!! There is more #Vaccine injuries from the #Covid #Vaccine than all #Vaccines combined, since 1971!!!” “Why is the TGA not looking into these #Vaccine injuries!? Well, the head of the Therapeutics Goods Administration, Professor Skerritt is also the HEAD of an organization that’s FUNDED by BIG PHARMA!? If you want to talk about, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, THIS IS IT!!!!” “If you read the report of the #Vaccine trials, you would understand that the vaccinated group vs unvaccinated group in the trials showed no benefits from the #Vaccine!!” “There is NOT one thing in those trials that showed this #Covid #Vaccine was effective!!! But did anyone in this room BOTHER TO READ THE REPORT!? I BET you did NOT!!! But you all went out there and told the public that it was ‘SAFE & EFFECTIVE, while you didn’t have a CLUE what you were talking about!!! SHAME ON YOU!!!!!” “The law in Australia has been broken : (1) You can NOT be coerced into taking a #Vaccine (2) You have to be PROPERLY INFORMED about what’s in a #Vaccine” SHAME ON YOU!!!!! #Covid #Vaccine
@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch
BREAKING: Health Canada FOIA request shows the COVID vaccine killed a lot more people than Health Canada would ever like to admit. 2,140 pages of death reports (each report spans multiple pages). Decide for yourself who is telling the truth. https://onedrive.live.com/?redeem=aHR0cHM6Ly8xZHJ2Lm1zL2IvYy9mM2EwNjIzYTI2Yzg3YmEwL0VhSUFfSTFPajR0TW5qdzVIZTNCUzk4QkY5bFQ3d0ZJSHVVbmRrV0UwQVFsdEE%5FQ1Q9MTcwMDUxMTYwODY0NyZPUj1PdXRsb29rLUJvZHkmQ0lEPTlDOUFERUIxLTRBOTUtNDM3My1COTEwLUQ4MUZFOEY4MEEyQg&cid=F3A0623A26C87BA0&id=F3A0623A26C87BA0%21s8dfc00a28f4e4c8b9e3c391dedc14bdf&parId=F3A0623A26C87BA0%21s87ede7fea2ca4c10a3be798f7f381ce5&o=OneUp…
@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch
Health Canada admits to 224 deaths that MIGHT be related to the COVID vaccine. By my estimate, over 100,000 Canadians prematurely died due to the COVID vaccines and I have the evidence now (record-level national data) to back up that estimate.
@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie
When The 'Cure' Is Worse Than The Disease Medsafe CARM Safety Report #32 For the #Covid shot Data Up to 9 Oct, 2021 Report Published 27 Oct, 2021 Total Adverse Events Reported: 27, 651 Adverse Events Deemed Serious: 982 Deaths Reported After the Shot: 91 15 of these deaths were people aged 30-59 yrs. 1 of the deaths was a person aged 10-29 yrs. (exact ages of the deaths isn't given in the report). In regard to the 982 serious adverse events, Medsafe defines 'serious' as: * Is a medically important event or reaction. * Requires hospitalisation or prolongs an existing hospitalisation. * Causes persistent or significant disability or incapacity. * Is life threatening. * Causes a congenital anomaly/birth defect. * Results in death. Keep in mind that Medsafe itself acknowledges that typical reporting captures no more than 5% of the actual number of adverse events. So if 27,651 adverse events might have only been 5% of the actual number, there could have been around 553,020 adverse events at that time. And do you know how many covid related deaths there were on 9 Oct 2021? There were 28. The majority of whom were people in their 70s, 80s and 90s who had underlying health conditions. 5 of them never even tested positive for covid (4 of them tested negative and 1 wasn't tested) but they were classed as 'probable cases' based on symptoms and they were all included in the official 'covid death' numbers. As of 9 Oct, 2021 NONE of the covid related deaths were under 50 yrs of age. Yet 15 people who were reported as having died after the covid shot were aged 30-59 yrs, and 1 person who died was aged 10-29 yrs. @winstonpeters @HopeRising19 @JudithCollinsMP @MurfittTauranga @nzfirst @chrisluxonmp @cjsbishop @dbseymour @AshBloomfield @TanyaUnkovichMP #NZCovidInquiry #mrnavaccines #vaccineinjuries #vaccinedeaths #DiedSuddenly #StopTheSilence
@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie
Medsafe CARM Safety Report #32 For the Covid Shot Data Up to 9 Oct, 2021 Report Published 27 Oct, 2021 https://www.medsafe.govt.nz/COVID-19/safety-report-32.asp#death
@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie
Track the covid cases, deaths, etc, day by day, month by month, year by year, for 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, here (this is the page for 2020) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_COVID-19_pandemic_in_New_Zealand_(2020)
@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie
#DiedSuddenly in New Zealand shortly after the #Pfizer mRNA injection
@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie
@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie
"The mass government campaigns to vaccinate yourself, to protect your parents, your neighbors, the weaker in society, were not only unauthorised, but also completely nonsense and not based on facts". https://t.co/QyuHE30z6O
@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie
@DiedSuddenly_ - DiedSuddenly
This report is from 2021, only months after the Covid Vaccine Rollout began. Millions injured. Tens of thousands dead. Why did they keep this hidden? “A total of 30,551 fatalities and 1.1 million adverse events due to COVID-19 vaccines have been reported by the European Union's official database. The European Medicines Agency site's figures, through Nov. 13, are from reports regarding the Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson and AztraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines.”
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
Breaking News: Korean Studies Reveal Startling Health Outcomes Post COVID-19 Vaccination Korean Studies Indicate What Our Governments are Hiding. In a groundbreaking revelation that's sending shockwaves through the global health community, Dr. Guy Hatchard sheds light on alarming findings from Korean studies about COVID-19 vaccinations. These studies, emerging from the heart of Seoul, uncover disturbing trends in health outcomes for vaccinated individuals, drawing a stark contrast with their unvaccinated counterparts. Why did former New Zealand PM and World Economic Forum cultist Jacinda Ardern exempt herself and 11,000 others from vaccination? https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1709827142148628638?s=20 Spanning a spectrum of serious health concerns, from blood disorders to debilitating musculoskeletal conditions, the research paints a harrowing picture of the potential risks associated with COVID-19 vaccines. Korean Government Data: "I don’t really need to explain much about these results do I? They speak for themselves. These studies analysed the rates of some specific health outcomes for millions of people following Covid vaccination. The researchers concluded that a very wide range of concerning health conditions are initiated over extended periods as a result of Covid vaccination." Dr Guy Hatchard This eye-opening data compels us to question the safety and long-term effects of these vaccines, challenging the narrative of their harmlessness and urging a reevaluation of our approach to pandemic health measures. In light of news emerging from a whistle blower in New Zealand linking Covid Vaccines to massive amounts of Excess Deaths will Jacinda Ardern face possible investigation and prosecution? https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1731788594782548440?s=20 In the shadow of a global health crisis, the startling surge in excess deaths linked to coercive health mandates casts a glaring spotlight on the dangers of unchecked globalism in public health policy. These revelations, laden with grief and outcry, serve as a stark wake-up call, challenging the monolithic approach of global health directives. They underscore the dire consequences of sacrificing individual health sovereignty at the altar of a one-size-fits-all global agenda. As we stand at this critical juncture, it is paramount to fiercely advocate for a world where individual health rights and freedoms are not just protected but revered, amidst the sweeping tides of global health governance. #WHO #WEF #WEF2030Agenda #DepopulationAgenda #Myocarditus #Pfizer #Moderna #NewZealand #DrGuyHatchard #ExcessDeaths #DiedSuddenly #SuddenDeaths #TurboCancer #mRNA #Korea #Health https://hatchardreport.com/korean-studies-indicate-what-our-government-is-hiding/
@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie
How can #Pfizer guarantee effectiveness and safety when the vaccine is still in a trial period? "We've got so much evidence, and we haven't seen anything that is alarming or different from what we expected to see from the clinical trials." The woman speaking is Sally Schnauer, who is a pharmacist and COVID-19 Immunisation Education Facilitator for IMAC (The Immunisation Advisory Centre). The woman 'setting a good example' for us all by sanitising her hands at 0:18 🤦♂️ is Aimee Brass, a nurse and Education Clinical Advisor at IMAC. This is from a webinar dated 9 Nov, 2021 that I found on the Vimeo channel of the Health and Quality Safety Commission, which is a New Zealand government agency. So Sally is saying that as of 9 Nov, 2021, there hasn't been anything alarming happen, but take a look at the video posted below this which looks at CARM safety Report #32, which has data up to 9 Oct, 2021, which is ONE MONTH BEFORE Sally is speaking. What can be seen in that report looks quite alarming to me. @PetousisH @SeanPlunket @theplatform_nz @DrShaneRetiMP @TanyaUnkovichMP @ErikaHarveyNZ @winstonpeters @MurfittTauranga @ChrisPenknz @chrisluxonmp @nzdsos
@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie
Medsafe CARM Safety Report #32 Data Up to 9 Oct, 2021 Report Published 27 Oct, 2021 Total Adverse Events Reported: 27, 651 Adverse Events Deemed Serious: 982 Deaths Reported After the Shot: 91 https://t.co/CYp7OpNWx9
@adhtvaus - ADH TV
"The excess deaths in Australia continue to equate to about two jumbo jet crashes each week, and every week, since 2021." "The formidable document which @AMPS_RedUnion put together 'Too Many Dead' addressing the excess deaths which only started to occur in Australia just after the introduction of the MRNA products of Pfizer and Moderna." Says Julian Gillispie (Director of Children's Health Defense, Australia) with @ellymelly on Spectator TV (@SpectatorOz). Video by @TheMilkBarTV To get a copy of the book 'Too Many Dead': https://amps.redunion.com.au/too-many-dead FULL EPISODE: https://watch.adh.tv/spectator-tv/season:2/videos/spectator-tv-australia-friday-16-february-2024 @DowdEdward @DrAseemMalhotra @JesslovesMJK @Kevin_McKernan @JosephFraiman @ClareCraigPath
@canindependent - The Canadian Independent
LOOK: Ontario Public Health has released a new infographic to reassure Ontarians that “vaccines are very safe” regarding adverse events but noted that it omitted information about the COVID-19 vaccines. One might ask, why would they choose to leave out the COVID-19 vaccines? Well, it may have to do with the fact that, according to Ontario Public Health's latest March 2024 COVID-19 vaccine safety report, it places 'other severe and unusual events' as the number one reported adverse event since the COVID-19 vaccine rollout back in December 2020. See the comments section for that info graphic and report. https://publichealthontario.ca/-/media/Documents/V/24/vaccine-safety-surveillance-tool-infographic.pdf
@canindependent - The Canadian Independent
Ontario Public Health's latest March 2024 COVID-19 vaccine safety report. https://www.publichealthontario.ca/-/media/Documents/nCoV/epi/covid-19-aefi-report.pdf https://t.co/ecUogSelUn
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
REPORT: The Australian government KNOWS the COVID shots are killing people, and they are “deliberately suppressing doctors” from reporting vaccine deaths. This allegation from Senator Malcolm Roberts. He says the government “can’t not know” about vaccine harms and that they are “killing people.” According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), in 2022, 174,717 deaths occurred, which is 22,886 (15.1%) more than the historical average. This is what Roberts describes as the “pandemic of injections.” @MRobertsQLD @efenigson
@CartlandDavid - (Honest/Ethical/Safe Dr) David Cartland
VAERS data on all vaccine deaths from 1988 to 2021. Covid vaccine deaths in 1 year are equivalent to deaths of all other vaccines in 33 years. Join: ~ The 17th Letter ~ https://t.co/DhLJWS4cec
@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig
I have been working with Steve on this Czech data. It is an analysis of 10m vaccine records in the public domain. The findings are catastrophic for the narrative that the vaccines were safe. I'll let him break the news and write about it tomorrow.
@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie
I was watching some old videos and thought I'd put together this brief timeline of injuries and deaths following the covid shots. 2 Dec 2020: Dr. Sucharit Bhakti warns, "I think it's downright dangerous and I warn you, if you go along these lines you are going to go to your doom." 18 Dec 2020: Again, Dr. Dr. Sucharit Bhakti, "This is the hugest experiment that has ever been done on people in the history of medicine." 11 Jan 2021: @delbigtree, "I've said that I believe there is going to be mass carnage, people are going to be injured, and this is what we've been watching in our news feeds, in our social media feeds as this vaccine has been rolled out across the nation and the world." We begin hearing about injuries and deaths. 18 Jan 2021: Norwegian Institute of Public Health cautions against vaccinating old people with serious underlying conditions, as 29 people die shortly after getting the Pfizer shot. 6 May 2021: Tucker Carlson reports, "Between late December of 2020 and last month, a total of 3,362 people apparently died after getting the covid vaccine in the United States." 9 May 2021: Here in New Zealand, @PetousisH on @1NewsNZ, says "There's nothing to suggest there's anything of concern here", following the deaths of two elderly people** shortly after the Pfizer shot. **Keep in mind what happened in Norway, see 18 Jan 2021 in this timeline. 15 May 2021: Del Bigtree again, on the increase in vaccine injuries and deaths being reported. Note: at this point, the Pfizer shot had yet to be rolled out to the wider public here in New Zealand. 23 Sep 2023: Lynda Wharton @HopeRising19 explains how by the end of November 2022, Medsafe (New Zealand's medicines regulator) had discontinued regular pharmacovigilance reports. At that time, these were the numbers: * 65,000 Adverse Event Reports. * 3,688 Serious Adverse Event Reports. * Nearly 6,000 Adverse Event Reports for 5-19 year olds. * 184 families reported the death of a loved one following the injection. * 974 Kiwis had myocarditis/pericarditis following the injection. @nzfirst @winstonpeters @TanyaUnkovichMP @actparty @dbseymour @ChrisPenknz @JudithCollinsMP @NZNationalParty @chrisluxonmp @P_McCulloughMD @stkirsch #NZCovidInquiry2
@Censored4sure - Luther ‘Ćyrus’
The Australian government “released” a long-awaited report on batch tests of Covid mRNA vaccines rolled out in the country during the pandemic, however every word on every page has been completely redacted. The 78-page document was released in response to a Freedom of Information (FOI) request by concerned medical staff including leading doctors who are warning the government is covering up the disastrous consequences of the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines in the Australian population.
@Censored4sure - Luther ‘Ćyrus’
@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”
VAERS data on all Vaccine Deaths from 1988 to 2021. 💉 Covid vaccine deaths in 1 year are equivalent to the Deaths of all other Vaccines in 33 years. 💉☠️ https://t.co/g9hkE5HoKE
@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense
If you take away nothing else from our X account, take this: “The United States government has paid out more than $5.22 billion to vaccine victims through the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, or the VICP. And as of June 28th, 2024, there were 48,101 deaths, and over 2.6 million adverse events reported to the U.S. government's Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System.” — Dawn Richardson, @NVICAdvocacy VICP government statistics: https://www.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/hrsa/vicp/vicp-stats-07-01-24.pdf Full video: https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/taking-a-stand-against-censorship/
@DrJaclynnMoskow - Dr Jaclynn Moskow
Which pharmaceuticals, medical devices, & surgical procedures have the LARGEST dedicated online communities of patients reporting harm? I obsessively & autistically dug into it — so that you don’t have to! (Research thread) ↓↓↓ https://t.co/3WAtivYnge
@DrJaclynnMoskow - Dr Jaclynn Moskow
To locate patient harm communities, I extensively & repeatedly searched Google, FB, Reddit, 𝕏, & my brain, plus prompted AI, & also reached out to harmed individuals / community leaders I used these intensive search tactics for all categories represented in this analysis — & for countless others that did not make the cut (due to a lack of communities, or minuscule-sized ones) More about my research methodology & segmentation as I delve into specific categories of results ↓↓↓
@DrJaclynnMoskow - Dr Jaclynn Moskow
FIRST PLACE: COVID-19 vaccine harm communities 456,000+ membership sign-ups I found more patient harm communities specific to COVID vaccines than I did for any other medication, product, or procedure These communities are concentrated on the FB platform, where I identified 124 active COVID vaccine harm support groups, with combined memberships totaling over 440,000 You may be thinking, “some people will join multiple groups, so that total membership number may be inflated” — this is true for all items in this thread & therefore does not significantly distort comparisons — if anything, repeat joiners underscore the gravity of the harm / impact a given intervention has on those affected Somehow, it does not appear that FB is currently putting forth major effort into censoring COVID vaccine harm groups — I was able to locate them fairly easily, and Google is even indexing some of them Most of such groups are “closed” & require an application to join — this helps prevent bots & maintain privacy Some may say, “not everyone in those communities is truly vaccine injured!” — and I would say — how do you know? I am merely reporting the (startling) group membership numbers that I found — not playing the “true harm” police Some key search terms to locate these support groups include “COVID vaccine” AND “side effect” “adverse reaction” “injury” “harm” “victim” AND/OR “name of specific pharmaceutical company” “name of specific adverse event”, etc To be clear, I ONLY tabulated groups that speak explicitly to vaccine injury / harm as defined by their group title / description / posts I did NOT include the many groups with themes such as “anti-vax” “unvaccinated” “vaccine free” “recipient” “fight” “truth” “information” “discussion” “awareness” “questions”, or even “vaccine experience” – nor did I include groups about the disease / syndrome of COVID I also did NOT include most “d*ed suddenly” groups, as most do NOT appear to be support communities, but are instead sensationalized & speculative and I did NOT include groups in which the topic is general vaccine harm that encompasses multiple vaccine types or a specific, non-COVID vaccine — that data is in a separate category of this analysis All groups that I included use at least one search term in English in their title and/or description — this is true for the COVID vaccine harm category & every other category in my study Outside of the many FB groups, other support options for COVID vaccine injury include: Subreddit: r/vaccinelonghauler 𝕏 community: Storiesofinjury I discovered SO MUCH about SO MUCH by investigating these communities – which I will report on further, over time One observation — many Australians & Canadians are PISSED ↓↓↓
@DrJaclynnMoskow - Dr Jaclynn Moskow
SECOND PLACE: Prescription opioid harm communities 380,000+ membership sign-ups *I am not anti-opioid, they are an extremely useful tool when used with precision, & I actually believe they are TOO hard to obtain in 2024 Nevertheless, there was a period of time during which they were wildly easy to obtain — in fact, when I began medical school in 2008, there were more pill mills around town in Broward County, Florida, than there were McDonalds If you are younger, you may not know this, but back in the 90s many physicians fully believed & told patients that Rx opioids were non-addictive (because, well, that is what pharma claimed & marketed) There are thus countless support communities for harm caused by prescription opioid use (& in many cases, misuse) Calculating group membership numbers for these medications was more complicated than for any other item in my study FB banned many prescription opioid harm groups due to drug sales — so entire communities were erased & not included in my total — additionally, other online forums were closed over the last few years per similar concerns To further complicate matters, these days, it is hard to find communities dedicated to prescribed-only opioid harm — most groups & forums are now geared towards “street use” — which often began as prescribed Nevertheless, I did some major autistic analysis to estimate membership across online support forums for Rx harm & it’s certainly in the hundreds of thousands You may argue that if someone is prescribed an opioid, and eventually decides to source it illegally, they are not iatrogenically harmed Or you may not argue that There is grey area in this topic matter, but it would be inappropriate to leave opioids off this list while including benzos — and it would be inappropriate to leave benzos off, but include SSRIs — and it would be inappropriate to leave SSRIs off, yet include other non-psych med pharmaceuticals — see the slope? Some examples of active communities in which members support each other as they speak to opioid harm, addiction, withdrawal, recovery: r/OpiateRecovery r/NarcoticsAnonymous FB NA groups Intherooms Soberrecovery Examples with a bit more of a focus on active use / harm reduction: Bluelight Drugs-forum It is unfortunate that someone who feels overwhelmed by a current & legit opioid prescription can no longer find a dedicated community, and is left only with forums that are heavy on illegal use — but this is where we are at ↓↓↓
@DrJaclynnMoskow - Dr Jaclynn Moskow
THIRD PLACE: Breast implant harm communities 345,000+ membership sign-ups This number was derived by totaling membership of all FB groups for breast implant complications / illness I found dozens of groups on FB for this topic — there do not appear to be any large communities or forums elsewhere, all internet roads lead back to FB for this one One very active & well-known FB group — Breast Implant Healing and Illness By Nicole – has an astounding 193K members Symptoms of breast implant illness may include autoimmune reactions, increased allergies, rashes, swollen lymph nodes, frequent infections, chronic fatigue, brain fog, joint & muscle pain, hair loss, headaches, mood disruptions, insomnia, endocrine dysfunction, GI issues, tingling / numbness in extremities, shortness of breath, & more Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is also a risk — particularly with textured implants ↓↓↓
@DrJaclynnMoskow - Dr Jaclynn Moskow
FOURTH PLACE: Intrauterine device (IUD) harm communities 210,000+ membership sign-ups This number was derived by totaling all injury, support, & side effect FB groups for IUD harm Some discussion of IUD harm can also be found across various birth control Internet forums – but dedicated IUD support communities are primarily contained to FB, as far as I could find Mirena is the most commonly cited IUD associated with harm — but there are women in these groups representing all IUDs on the market The body often doesn’t like foreign material inserted into it… “Cite your source for that statement!” No ↓↓↓
@DrJaclynnMoskow - Dr Jaclynn Moskow
FIFTH PLACE: SSRI / SNRI harm communities 176,000+ membership sign-ups There are 64,000+ membership sign-ups to FB groups related to SSRI harm & withdrawal Some FB groups are generalized to any/all SSRIs, while other FB groups are drug-specific I investigated groups for all SSRIs on the market While I only counted membership sign-ups for HARM-specific groups, it is worth noting that there are also MANY members of generalized drug side effect discussion groups who feel harmed In terms of SNRIs, there are several FB groups for duloxetine & venlafaxine harm, with membership totaling 47,000+ SurvivingAntidepressants(dot)org has 20,000+ members PSSD Network subreddit has 14,300+ members (PSSD = Post-SSRI Sexual Dysfunction) Plus, there are other, smaller forums & threads for SSRI / SNRI harm – including psych med harm discussions in general mental health online communities — and many conversations specific to a given drug The majority of members of SurvivingAntidepressants(dot)org are there for SSRIs/SNRIs as opposed to other types of antidepressants — but not all Similarly, a subset of r/PSSD joined for finasteride harm as opposed to SSRI/SNRI harm I accounted for the above facts, but they are near-negligible I have been investigating psych med harm for over a decade, and I am as close to “sure” as one can be that these communities only represent a tiny, tiny fraction of the total number of patients harmed by these drugs ~ Just the tip of the iceberg ~ You can find more about this topic on the highlights section of my page — and much more is to come from me about this, so follow my account if interested ↓↓↓
@DrJaclynnMoskow - Dr Jaclynn Moskow
SIXTH PLACE: Benzodiazepine harm communities 161,000+ membership sign-ups *I am not anti-benzo, these medications can be a g-dsend short term Benzobuddies(dot)org withdrawal support & more forum has 34,000+ members Subreddit r/benzorecovery has 43,000+ members FB groups about benzo harm total 45,000+ members There are also benzo-specific support containers on various substance use forums across the internet ↓↓↓
@DrJaclynnMoskow - Dr Jaclynn Moskow
SEVENTH PLACE: Botulinum toxin & dermal filler harm communities 152,000+ membership sign-ups Many FB groups combine Botulinum toxin harm with dermal filler harm — so, our data reflects this combination as well I looked into this topic “late” in my research process, as I did not anticipate finding a large number of membership sign-ups But alas, there are oh-so-many people with Botulinum toxin & filler horror stories (and photos) While the vast majority of support groups are concentrated on FB, r/BotoxSupportCommunity is also an option The nature of the “harm” in these groups is wide-ranging — from serious adverse events requiring hospitalization, to dissatisfaction with cosmetic results Regardless of whether or not we would ~personally~ classify an outcome as “harm”, it is a patient’s lived experience that defines such impact Individuals considering injections for cosmetic purposes would be well-served by first exploring these groups I personally love my wrinkles & natural face — I hope you love yours too! (and yes, there are non-cosmetic indications for Botulinum toxin) ↓↓↓
@DrJaclynnMoskow - Dr Jaclynn Moskow
EIGHTH PLACE: Amphetamine harm communities 70,000+ membership sign-ups *I am not blanket anti-stimulant, but it is important that patients know the risks Amphetamine harm community membership numbers are challenging to quantify with precision, but I tackled this nonetheless As with Rx opioids, it appears all FB groups for amphetamine harm support have been removed due to drug sales occurring within, causing entire communities to disappear My searches led to FB labeling me as likely having an addiction of sorts, and proclaiming “we would like to help you find ways to get free and confidential treatment referrals” — that’s actually pretty nice, right? I know nothing of what happens if you take them up on this, but it seems like their heart is in the right place Back to my analysis… ADHD-med harm threads are commonly mixed in with other substances Some active communities include: r/StopSpeeding r/AdderallAddiction r/AddictedtoADHDmeds r/NarcoticsAnonymous Bluelight FB NA groups Drugs-forum Etc ↓↓↓
@DrJaclynnMoskow - Dr Jaclynn Moskow
NINTH PLACE: LASIK eye surgery harm communities 65,000+ membership sign-ups This number was derived by totaling all FB groups for LASIK eye surgery complications, plus r/Lasiksupport Some of you will comment that you loved your LASIK — I am glad it worked out for you — it doesn’t for everyone In fact, fwiw, in the 90s, one of my family members’ vision was destroyed by LASIK complications, plus chronic pain that persists to this day & other life-altering effects I personally have extreme myopia and will NEVER undergo elective eye surgery Contacts & glasses for life, for me ↓↓↓
@DrJaclynnMoskow - Dr Jaclynn Moskow
TENTH PLACE: General vaccine harm communities 62,000+ membership sign-ups There is, of course, a history of censorship with this topic — which has stifled some groups’ discoverability & membership numbers Yet, most FB groups for vaccine harm / injury are surprisingly functional at the moment For the purposes of this analysis, I defined “general” vaccine harm communities as those that encompass multiple vaccines types, or are specific to any non-COVID vaccine Among non-COVID vaccine harm groups, I discovered that Gardasil is the most commonly represented I ONLY included groups in my tabulations that specifically & explicitly speak to vaccine harm / injury as defined by their group title / description / posts — I did NOT include the many groups with themes such as “anti-vax” “unvaccinated” “vaccine free” “vaccine discussion” “vaccine concern” “vaccine truth” I also joined ChildrensHealthDefense to investigate their community — while not all members are there for vaccine harm, if I personally was looking for information & support related to vaccine injury, I would turn to their threads / resources before FB I am also fortunate enough to have physicians within my personal network who are experts in vaccine injury — physicians you have almost certainly never heard of, as they have no major public presence (by design) I am hopeful that under the new Trump administration, my colleagues who are bravely treating vaccine-injured patients will no longer feel the need to hide ↓↓↓
@DrJaclynnMoskow - Dr Jaclynn Moskow
ELEVENTH PLACE: Detransition communities 60,000+ membership sign-ups Detransitioners may be the fastest-growing population of harmed patients → r/detrans is the largest of the support groups & discussion & r/detransition_support is another resource, as are some smaller FB groups I think that it is likely that many (most?) transitioners will also, eventually, feel as if they were iatrogenically harmed — but for the purpose of this particular analysis, I only tabulated communities with members who ~self-identity~ as harmed, right now — ie are detransitioning (vs transitioning or transitioned) I did it this way in order to remain congruent with how I tackled other topics in this thread ↓↓↓
@DrJaclynnMoskow - Dr Jaclynn Moskow
AND MORE HARM COMMUNITIES: 12) Essure contraceptive (pulled from market) — FB groups for complications, support, & litigation → 45,000+ membership sign-ups 13) Gabapentin / pregabalin — FB groups for harm & withdrawal, plus r/gabapentin with focus on “issues”, plus discussion on other psych & neuro med forums → 34,000+ membership sign-ups 14) Atypical antipsychotics — FB groups for harm, plus some representation on SurvivingAntidepressants & other forums → 33,000+ membership sign-ups (it seems many individuals who take or have taken atypicals feel their side effects are/were “necessary” vs that they are/were harmed — I will get into this more another day!) 15) Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) — FB groups for withdrawal & harm, mostly specific to amitriptyline, plus some representation on SurvivingAntidepressants & other forums → 27,000+ membership sign-ups 16) Accutane / Isotretinoin — FB groups for long-term side effects & subreddit for recovery → 27,000+ membership sign-ups 17) Transvaginal & hernia mesh, bladder slings — FB groups for injury → 23,000+ membership sign-ups 18) Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) — FB groups for harm → 14,500+ membership sign-ups 19) Gastric bands — FB groups for harm → 13,500+ membership sign-ups 20) Statins — FB groups for harm→ 13,000+ membership sign-ups (this number would be much larger if more people realized that some of the symptoms they attribute to disease, aging, genetics, bad luck, etc are actually being caused by statins — this is outside the scope of today’s data dump — we’ll “go there” soon!) 21) Gadolinium contrast dye — FB groups for harm, plus a community on groups(dot)io → 11,000+ membership sign-ups (my brilliant clinician friend says this category of harm is massively under-recognized) 22) Fluoroquinolone antibiotics — FB group for toxicity → 9,000+ membership sign-ups 23) Finasteride — propeciahelp(dot)com, plus small FB group & discussions of PFS on r/PSSD → 7,000+ membership sign-ups 24) Bupropion — some harmed patients go to general anti-depressant help groups, plus FB groups for drug-specific harm → 5,000+ membership sign-ups Now for discussion time! ↓↓↓
@DrJaclynnMoskow - Dr Jaclynn Moskow
Interestingly, all medications & procedures for which I identified a large community of patients discussing harm can be categorized as some combination of “avoidable” “elective” “unnecessary” “substitutable” and/or “optional” and one was, sadly, in some cases, “mandated” ↓↓↓
@DrJaclynnMoskow - Dr Jaclynn Moskow
Of note: To be extra clear: I did not include drug / procedure support communities that focus on anything other than harm — ie I did not include any of the groups where people cheer each other on as they battle psych meds side effects, or deliberate on cosmetic procedures, or make sense of the hell of chemo, or etc Only HARM-specific groups were tabulated! Community name & description inform whether group is harm-specific In fact, some “side effect” communities that I discovered specially indicate that only “positive” discussions are welcome & that those with a negative opinion of the associated medication / procedure should not join In my analysis, I did not consider such groups to be iatrogenic harm groups ↓↓↓
@DrJaclynnMoskow - Dr Jaclynn Moskow
It is also very important to understand that not every pharmaceutical, device, or surgery HAS an online community of harmed patients In fact, MOST do not ↓↓↓
@DrJaclynnMoskow - Dr Jaclynn Moskow
Additionally — “harm” can vary widely in manifestation, intensity, duration, impact, & disability ↓↓↓
@DrJaclynnMoskow - Dr Jaclynn Moskow
and, of course, some pharmaceuticals are prescribed more frequently than others & some procedures performed more often than others Rarer treatments may appear to cause less harm simply because fewer individuals are exposed and vice versa ↓↓↓
@DrJaclynnMoskow - Dr Jaclynn Moskow
This data/analysis is not meant to imply that the treatments or procedures with the most community members are necessarily the most harmful, but rather to highlight raw numbers of harmed patients seeking support through online communities ↓↓↓
@DrJaclynnMoskow - Dr Jaclynn Moskow
Wow this is long! I will wrap it up More on what I discovered & calculated to come I actually had sat down to write a “quick post” off the top of my head about harmed patient communities — and it turned into full days of obsessing ↓↓↓
@DrJaclynnMoskow - Dr Jaclynn Moskow
If this thread leads to one single person more deeply considering a proposed treatment, and/or if it prevents a single iatrogenic injury, then my time was perfectly spent ↓↓↓
@DrJaclynnMoskow - Dr Jaclynn Moskow
What do you make of all this? Surprised? Unsurprised? Did any of these medications or procedures harm you or someone you know?
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Australian Medical Icon Breaks Down in Tears Over COVID Vaccine Catastrophe Professor Ian Brighthope delivered an emotional critique of the COVID-19 vaccination program, describing it as “the most uncontrolled experimentation ever on humankind.” Dr. Brighthope exposed a disturbing pattern he and his colleagues have observed: an alarming surge in “turbo cancers” linked to COVID-19 booster shots. “Patients who have been cancer-free for many years are suddenly relapsing with aggressive explosive cancers shortly after receiving booster doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. These cases show very rapid tumor growth following the booster administration,” he stated. “These turbo cancers are emerging faster and with greater virulence than we would expect in patients, even those who had been stable for years,” he continued. “The public health authorities are reluctant to acknowledge the correlation. This is happening across the globe where the mRNA vaccines have been administered.” With over 60 million doses of these vaccines administered to more than 20 million Australians, Dr. Brighthope issued a grave warning: “There is a potential long-term health crisis waiting to happen.” He called on the government to act urgently, saying, “This matter must be taken seriously by every Australian.” This video is a must-watch.
@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”
Globally it is estimated that 7.3 million to 15 million died from the Covid vaccines. 29 to 60 million have been disabled globally. 500 to 900 million are vaccine injured. Yet they are still ramping up to make more mRNA vaccines‼️ https://t.co/ln9hESb0NM
@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz
This has got to be the final word on the absolute disaster of the adverse side effects of the jab. 99 million subjects, 22 different credentialed co-authored public health professionals spanning both research universities & national governments. Save it, bookmark, send to friends
@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”
VAERS data on all vaccine deaths from 1988 to 2021. Covid vaccine deaths in 1 year are equivalent to deaths of all other vaccines in 33 years. https://t.co/S8b3jo2o9P
@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson
I knew the Covid vaccine was dangerous, but after listening to this hearing- it’s so much worse than we thought. We heard from top experts who have been censored- until now. Here is what we know about the vaccine 🧵 https://t.co/g4Osbb67XM
@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson
First I want to point out that the panel was placed under oath. If they lied, it would be a federal crime. https://t.co/ylRaXOom7G
@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson
First, @P_McCulloughMD who is one of the most published people in the world on Covid vaccine myocarditis spoke. He saw warning signs as early as August of 2021 that the vaccines can cause myocarditis… https://t.co/Gexd9yXOhU
@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson
Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart. Before Covid, Dr. McCullough saw two patients with this problem. Now there are over 1000 peer reviewed studies on Covid vaccine myocarditis. https://t.co/jF2NTSgelG
@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson
🚨 But that’s not all. There have been 216 vaccine deaths this year alone. Medical products have been pulled from the market for a fraction of those deaths, yet the COVID vaccine remains. https://t.co/K7roV5rI5v
@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson
Currently the CDC reports that the mRNA stays in the arm for a short period of time and then it leaves the body. However, Dr. Jordan Vaughn cited to a study that found the vaccine in the heart tissue of mice. https://t.co/Z17ndJEPgu
@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson
This one especially hurts as I’m seeing close friends struggle with fertility. Dr. James Thorp found that the vaccine causes miscarriage, stillbirth, birth defects, and even death of the newborn. Also, an animal study found the vaccine DESTROYS 60% of the ovarian reserve. https://t.co/109ejSfdeN
@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson
Studies even found that women who had the vaccine in the first trimester had an 82% miscarriage rate. https://t.co/6Ul8ec06GD
@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson
Why has this been allowed to happen? Pharma paid peer reviewers 1.06 BILLION to corrupt the peer review process and hide this data. https://t.co/H97UNMXBN4
@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson
Dr. McCullough warns that death is a known side effect of these vaccines and they STILL do not have a black box warning to give people informed consent. https://t.co/kc1lkdmsAd
@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson
But wait, there’s more… Dr. McCullough says it was RECKLESS for sports teams to mandate the vaccine when strenuous activity should be avoided for people with myocarditis. https://t.co/tH4ybiiUUf
@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson
But side effects are extremely rare right? Wrong… According to Dr. Joel Wallskog, serious adverse events happen for every 1 in 800 people. https://t.co/WRipvbScHo
@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson
Over 30,000 deaths have been reported to VAERS alone and studies show less than 1% of adverse events are actually reported to VAERS. https://t.co/ygJ6Y82sJs
@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson
But the vaccine slowed the spread right? No. It didn’t even do that. https://t.co/kq5jladnsA
@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson
So why have vaccine manufacturers not been held accountable for their dangerous product? There is only one product in America that you cannot sue the manufacturer for design defects…and that’s vaccines. You can thank Congress for the PREP act and the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act for that.
@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson
Why are these vaccines still on the market? Well it seems like this is big pharma’s world and we are just living in it. @SenRonJohnson has gone above and beyond to bring the truth to light and we need more representatives like him to overcome big pharma. In the meantime, we need to educate ourselves and our family on the dangers of these vaccines. We don’t have to wait for the government to act.
@AnnaRMatson - Anna Matson
As always, your support means so much to me as it allows me to continue my work as a true independent. Like, follow, subscribe and be ready for more!
@A1an_M - Alan
During the coronapanic it was routine for those of us in the sceptic camp to be attacked online for being conspiracy theorists and for us to be pestered by the Big Pharma apologists to provide "references" to prove our points (as well as being censored and cancelled by people working for our own government). No reference was ever good enough for them of course, but during that time I built up a huge archive of impeccably sourced information pointing directly to the whole thing being a massive scam. Where possible I'd go back and analyse the source data, rather than rely on a newspaper article or some third-hand commentator. I thought I'd collect together the top few pieces of evidence and put them in a thread here for future reference in an attempt to make sure the whole thing doesn't get brushed under the carpet under the banner of "It was all Tony Fauci's fault for doing gain of function research". The scandal is so much bigger and wider than that. So here it is 🧵: 1/10
@A1an_M - Alan
Item 1 - Prof John Ioannidis estimates of the Infection Fatality Rate of COVID. John Ioannidis, world-leading epidemiologist from Stanford (or he was at that time, his name was soon dragged through the mud), used seroprevalence data (indicating how many people had been exposed to SARS-COV-2) from studies around the world (32 different locations) to estimate the infection fatality rate of COVID-19 (how many people will die on average in a group of people infected with the virus). He concluded that the median infection fatality rate was 0.27% and that for people under 70, the median was 0.05% (1 in 2,000), showing that the virus was overwhelmingly a risk only to the elderly and even then, little more of a risk than seasonal influenza. (As a comparison, the IFR of seasonal influenza is about 1 in 1,000 (0.1%) across all age groups). These rates (from the real world) were far lower than those used in Imperial College modelling and quoted in the media by politicians. An early indication that the whole thing was being overblown. And these estimates were produced very early on in the "pandemic" before the virus had mutated to become even less deadly. Ioannidis study: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.13.20101253v3 2/10
@A1an_M - Alan
Item 2 - the Diamond Princess Cruise Ship Further evidence that SARS-COV-2 was primarily a threat only to the very elderly was provided by the outcomes for passengers on the Diamond Princess cruise ship. A passenger who had been on the ship and disembarked in Hong Kong subsequently tested positive for COVID-19 and, as a result, the ship was quarantined and passengers and crew stayed on board rather than disembarking in Japan. This gave an opportunity to study the behaviour of the virus in a real life "petri-dish" with thousands of people in close proximity being exposed to the virus. There were 3,711 passengers and crew on the Diamond Princess. Median age 58. Everyone on board had a PCR test (eventually) 619 out of 3,711 tested positive (17%), of whom 301 had symptoms and 318 had no symptoms. There were 7 deaths (6 in the 70-79 age group, 1 in the over 80 age group). So even in a very elderly cohort of people, whom we must assume were all exposed to the virus, only 0.18% of people died. We could also infer that there must have been existing immunity to the virus in this population, given how few tested positive, and how few of those developed symptoms. Link to study: https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.12.2000256 Link to Daily Sceptic analysis: https://dailysceptic.org/2021/03/27/the-diamond-princess-told-us-about-pre-existing-immunity-asymptomatic-infection-and-the-infection-fatality-rate-why-were-those-lessons-ignored/ 3/10
@A1an_M - Alan
Item 3 - ONS data from Freedom of Information requests ONS data gradually became more and more politicised during the coronapanic, and therefore less and less useful, but the data it gave in response to FOI requests in 2020 was actually quite useful. For example this analysis of the age breakdown of those who died following a positive COVID test in 2020 in England and Wales. It showed once again the extent to which this virus was primarily a threat to the very elderly, with 84% of victims over the age of 70 (and also, only 9 victims under the age of 15). Again, consistent with the earlier Ioannidis analysis. Other FOI requests revealed that the mean age of those who died with COVID was over 80, and that, of the 80,000+ deaths recorded "with COVID" in 2020, only 9,000 listed COVID as the sole cause of death on the death certificate - the overwhelming majority of deaths involved at least one other comorbidity. This data also made it possible to compare the age distribution of deaths with COVID in 2020, with deaths from all causes in 2019, and this analysis revealed that if you were under the age of 75, you were more likely to die of any cause, than with COVID. So these three analyses showed that, from an early date, it was clear that SARS-COV-2 was not the deadly threat to everyone it was portrayed to be. ONS FOI links: https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/deathsfromcovid19byageband https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/averageageofthosewhohaddiedwithcovid19 https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/deathsfromcovid19withnootherunderlyingcauses 4/10
@A1an_M - Alan
Item 4 - Mask Ineffectiveness In July 2020 there was a sudden turnaround in recommendations for mask wearing amongst the general population. Prior to this date, there had been a consensus that this was neither necessary nor desirable. But suddenly that all changed. The science hadn't changed, there was a randomly controlled trial conducted in Denmark in April/May 2020 which found no statistically significant difference in infections between mask-wearing and non-mask wearing groups. And subsequent studies reviewed by the Cochrane Library found the same. But what had changed was "political lobbying" with the WHO to change their guidance on masks, as the BBC revealed in a rare outbreak of COVID investigative journalism by them (youtube link below). Denmark masks study: https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/m20-6817 BBC Newsnight clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnRqUMxjvR4 5/10
@A1an_M - Alan
Item 5 - Vaccine ineffectiveness There were plenty of signs that the COVID vaccines were not effective in preventing infection, or transmission, or hospitalisation, or death with COVID, at a population level, just by comparing the rates before and after the introduction of the vaccines. The vaccine introduction in mid December 2020 coincided with an uptick in all of these variables. (What changed the trend was the appearance of the omicron variant which Bill Gates dolefully described as "a type of vaccine" which had done a better job of reaching the whole population than the vaccinators). But a study in the International Journal of Epidemiology gave evidence of something which we all observed anecdotally all around us: that vaccinated people were still becoming infected with the virus. The study found that after two doses of the Astra Zeneca vaccine or one dose of the Pfizer vaccine, that whatever immunity the vaccines delivered against the virus quickly waned and actually turned negative within 2-3 months (meaning recipients were more likely to be infected or hospitalised beyond that point). OurWorldInData link: https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/covid?pickerSort=asc&pickerMetric=location&Metric=Confirmed+deaths&Interval=Cumulative&Relative+to+population=true&country=~OWID_WRL International Journal of Epidemiology link https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/52/1/22/6770060?login=false 6/10
@A1an_M - Alan
Item 6 - Risk to Children As we know, in 2020 schools across the UK were closed as part of the national lockdowns, with disastrous impact on education, particularly of the very young and those due to sit exams, and disastrous impact on working parents who had to somehow balance work and home schooling. However it was clear from very early days that children were at vanishingly small risk from the virus and that the risks to them of losing education (and the resultant isolation from their peers) would be far higher. An article in The Times discussed a study conducted on 260 hospitals in Britain in the first half of 2020 and concluded that "no child who was not already profoundly ill has died of Covid-19 in Britain" "The study looked at 260 hospitals in England, Wales and Scotland. Out of the 69,500 patients admitted with proven Covid-19 in the first six months of the year, 651 — or 0.9 per cent — were under 19 years of age". "Six deaths of minors were recorded. Three were newborn babies with other severe health problems. The other three were aged 15 to 18 years old and also had “profound health issues”. Callum Semple, professor in child health and outbreak medicine at the University of Liverpool and Alder Hey Children’s Hospital, who is the senior author of the study, said: “The deaths that we did observe were children with what we would describe as profound co-morbidities — not a touch of asthma, not cystic fibrosis.” These children’s underlying illnesses would have been considered as “life-limiting”, he said. “We did not have any deaths in otherwise healthy school-aged children.” However the authorities, and some in the teaching profession, were happy to let the illusion that children were at some risk from the virus to persist in order to promote their own agendas. Times article: https://www.thetimes.com/uk/healthcare/article/all-children-who-died-of-covid-19-were-already-seriously-ill-jlxr8mkxq 7/10
@A1an_M - Alan
Item 7 Vaccine adverse effects We were assured, repeatedly, from the moment the novel COVID injectables were released, that they were "safe and effective". However the evidence that they were not quickly mounted. As early as March 2020, the Astra Zeneca vaccine was suspended in Nordic countries following adverse effects in medical workers who received it. And the MHRA was forced to mention the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis particularly in young males from vaccination with the Pfizer and Moderna products. And a number of coroners reports directly blamed the COVID injectables as the cause of death in several cases. But the insistence always remained that these were just extremely rare cases. The lie was given to all of this by the MHRA's Yellow Card data. Yellow Card had, up until December 2021 at least, always been used as an "early warning system" to identify problems with medicines. From the beginning of the tollout in December 2020 the MHRA received an absolute deluge of Yellow Card reports from recipients of the injectables who had suffered adverse effects immediately afterwards, as well as medical personnel reporting these symptoms on behalf of the injured and deceased. While not every reported injury may have been directly caused by the vaccine, we also know that Yellow Cards received by the MHRA only constitute a small fraction of the adverse effects actually experienced (they previously estimated that only 10% of serious effects were reported). By September 2023 it was clear from the data that there was an enormous issue with the safety of the vaccines. Serious adverse events were being reported to the MHRA at a rate of 1 for every 424 doses, and deaths running at 1 for every 60,000 doses (and bear in mind most people had at least 2 doses) but to this day there has been no acknowledgement or independent investigation. AZ injuries story: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-norway-idUSKBN2B50GZ/ The MHRA data has been largely archived in obscure locations on the internet now so is hard to link to, but I have all of the receipts if anyone is interested. 8/10
@A1an_M - Alan
Item 8 - Exaggerating the numbers of people who were Vaccinated. We were led to believe by the media that we vaccine refuseniks were in a tiny minority - less than 10%. And this was used heavily as a tactic by the media and government to pressure everyone into being vaccinated. You'll remember all the pressure from the likes of Andrew Neil and Piers Morgan and Sajid Javed and Esther Rantzen and Anne McElvoy and Uncle Tom Cobley and all... But this 10% number was based on ONS data which relied on (old) estimates of the UK population. Meanwhile the Health Security Agency used data from NIMS, which has a record of everyone registered with the NHS, and it estimated that the proportion of the English population which had not received a vaccine, was 19.5%. And ICM ran an opinion poll for Scottish Television on a representative sample of the population which discovered that 32% of the sample (825 out of the 2570 participants) said they'd had no vaccines. But as identified by @profnfenton ICM were sufficiently astonished at this outcome that they decided to apply some "post-survey weighting" to their sample to bring the number down to the "correct" level of 8%. But it's clear that we unvaccinated are a sizeable minority - far more than 10%. And the government knew this too, which is why they eventually recoiled from making the vaccines mandatory in the NHS (and probably in other roles too). BBC https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-55274833 ICM poll, Prof Fenton analysis: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccWOMtmH65U 9/10
@A1an_M - Alan
That's just a subset of the huge library of evidence that exists whoing that the whole of the coronavirus response was at best unnecessary and, more realistically, a gigantic fraud. You no doubt have plenty of examples of your own. But in summary: There was no "pandemic", simply a simulation of one. A simulation which could be repeated again tomorrow. And it could be done whether a novel virus existed or not. All that's needed is a compliant media, a gullible, hypnotised population, and a few grainy videos of crisis actors "dying" on foreign streets, and off we'll go again. Unless... unless some proper journalists are willing to tell the WHOLE truth about what happened in 2020-22, rather than just focus on the limited hangout about the lab leak and the source of the virus. Any volunteers? 10/10
@A1an_M - Alan
Of course the biggest fraud of all, and the one which the entire simulation depended on, and on which any new simulation will also depend, was the use of a test protocol, PCR, which was unfit for the purpose for which it was used. A test protocol which, as per its creator, can find pretty much anything in anyone, if done well. A test capable of finding tiny fragments of virus which are far too small to cause symptomatic illness, and far too small to make transmission to others a possibility. A test incapable of determining if the host is carrying live virus. A test which could deliver significant numbers of false positives and negatives. (False positives being a particular problem if, as mentioned below, decisions on isolation and contact tracing are being made on their basis). But a test whose sensitivity could be dialled up or down to show a sudden spike or dip in "cases" to meet the political requirements of the day. But the whole "testdemic" aspect is so important, it probably deserves a thread all of its own. One for another day... 11/10
@A1an_M - Alan
Probably worth adding that this thread is a summary of seven much longer threads which I wrote in Sep '23 to counter BBC VeryIffy's charge that there was an online Conspiracy Movement in the UK spreading misinformation about COVID and the response. See here: https://t.co/J6eOwBPb7i
@KshatriyaHero - BHAGWAN PARASHURAMA'S ARMY
Heart attacks, brain strokes, cancers, blood clots, nervous system disorders, etc. have risen exponentially after 2021, after the covid vaccines were given. *Did you know that there are over 1000 side effects reported after the use of Covid-19 Vaccines as detailed in a WHO website?* Go to the WHO website http://www.vigiaccess.org and scroll to the bottom of the page, click ‘I confirm…’ then click ‘Search Database’ and type in Covid-19 Vaccine, then select AstraZeneca which is Covisheild. Then click ‘Search’. Then click on each of the 27 categories of side effects. Whoever took the Covid Vaccine and has been having some new health issues since 2021, please check out the above and share this info with others too who are suffering. *If you want to know the potential side effects of the HPV Vaccine they are currently giving our children*, instead of Covid-19 Vaccine, type in Gardasil 9 which is the previous HPV Vaccine. Follow the same steps. It also has over 1000 side effects. *For options of detoxifying your body from the Covid-19 Vaccine toxins*, please visit our page https://integrativemedicinecommittee.org/2025/04/14/covid-vaccine-detox-protocols *Integrative Medicine & Healthcare Committee* http://www.integrativemedicinecommittee.org