reSee.it - Related Post Feed

@ivan_8848 — Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Posted - July 11, 2023 at 11:21 PM

Saved - June 1, 2024 at 2:38 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

A divisive figure, this man is seen by some as a destructive force, while others view him as a typical corrupt leader. In 2019, he was elected with a strong mandate for peace. However, there are those who accuse him of crimes and betrayal. Watch "Agent Zelensky - Part 1" for more.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

This man will go down in history as the person who destroyed his own country for fame and fortune. This man will go down in history as first-class crook, of which there have been many in history. In 2019, Zelensky was elected on an overwhelming mandate to make peace with Russia. Zelensky committed too many crimes and betrayed his people. He deserved Hitler's fate. Agent Zelensky - Part 1 https://youtu.be/HLeBb6hPUC8

Video Transcript AI Summary

The Ukrainian President, Zelensky, owns properties in Miami, Israel, Italy, London, Georgia, and Crimea. His real estate holdings include a villa in Tuscany, a house in Israel, an apartment in London, and multiple apartments in Georgia. However, his penthouse in Crimea, purchased before Russian control, could pose political risks. Zelensky's total real estate assets are extensive, but he has not transferred them to his children. This has led to criticism of his perceived stinginess and greed.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Let's go. Firstly, a villain in Miami for himself worth $34,000,000. I've been to Florida and can understand the taste of the president of Ukraine. Secondly, a house in Israel for his parents on the shores of the Mediterranean Sea. It's worth $8,000,000. Europe, Zalewski prefers Italy. Tuscany, the best wines. By the way, one of the most expensive resorts in the country, Forte d'Alle Marbi. Houses here are worth their waiting goal. In 2017, together with his wife, he bought a villa 600 meters from the sea. According to the declaration, it was worth about $3,800,000 at that time. Is that all? Not at all. From the south, we moved north, not to Siberia, of course, but to London, old center, legendary Baker Street, opposite the Sherlock Holmes Museum. There's another Zelensky residence, An apartment worth $3,000,000. Why? Probably the state will visit his owners with a report. More on that later. Apparently, the real estate was purchased through the company of his business partner, Sergei Schiffer. That's why he's called Zelensky's personal wallet in Ukraine. I almost forgot about real estate. Georgia, not the state, the country. A new multi story apart hotel in the city of Batumi. You might ask, Batumi? What is that? Well, take a look. It's also a seaside resort. Apartments are under renovation with an expensive finish, panoramic windows, and views in the city and the mountains. Hence, it is built for well-to-do people. At least 5 apartments here belong to Zelensky. Finally, the settlement of Levadia, an elite residential complex emperor. Speaker 1: Look. A magnificent view of Zelensky's house opens up. Here it is, a seashore over there. Speaker 0: Lions, wide staircases, and columns. On the roof, there's a luxurious terrace, a pool, and a wonderful sea view. But guys, it's Crimea. Crimea, which is currently under Russian control. Zelensky made a mistake here, and the Russians will surely figure out how to use it to their advantage. Zelensky's penthouse was purchased here in 2013, right before the so called Crimean spring. Nowadays such a property could be worth about $1,000,000. However, a different amount is stated in his declaration. 1,384,000 Hibernias or about $164,000. Well, we don't even need to mention the real estate in chief or the official residence of the head of the republic in Concha Zaspa. Even without those, it's quite a collection of villas, houses, and apartments. However, the Ukrainian president is in no rush to give them to children, at least not to other people's children. Unfortunately, we have to admit the obvious. Volodymyr Zelensky has always been stingy and greedy.

@WarClandestine — Clandestine

Posted - July 14, 2023 at 1:07 AM

Saved - July 14, 2023 at 2:59 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The Biden regime's reluctance to engage in peace talks with Russia and the deployment of more US troops can be attributed to Russia's accusations. They claim that Biden's biolab company in Ukraine, Metabiota, is involved in bioweapons production. Russia has presented evidence at the UN, demanding a Security Council investigation into the US biological network in Ukraine. Biden's direct involvement hinders any possibility of peace talks. These labs were initially denied by the media but later acknowledged, though they insist they are not nefarious. Hunter Biden's ownership of a biolab studying coronaviruses adds to the complexity. Billions of dollars in Ukraine and the sacrifice of its people are connected to Russia seeking justice for violations of the Biological Weapons Treaty. The ongoing escalation in Ukraine is seen as retaliation for the US's creation of Covid-19. Russian General Igor Kirillov has previously briefed the public on Hunter Biden's Metabiota and the US Biological network.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

For those wondering why peace talks haven’t happened and why the Biden regime are sending more US troops to Russia; allow me to enlighten you. Russian MIL accused Biden himself of orchestrating bioweapons production via his biolab company operating in Ukraine, Metabiota. Biden cannot allow Ukraine to surrender and he cannot have peace talks with Putin, because Russia have presented evidence at the UN over the past 18 months, of biological weapon production by US funded labs in Ukraine, and Russia have demanded that a stipulation for peace would be a UN Security Council investigation of the US biological network in Ukraine. Biden cannot have this because he is directly involved. Keep in mind these are the same biolabs that the MSM initially said didn’t exist at all, only to then later admit that they do exist, but claim they are totally not nefarious in any way. Hunter Biden just has ownership of a biolab company operating in Ukraine, studying bat coronaviruses BEFORE the pandemic. Nothing to see here. This is why hundreds of billions of your dollars are in Ukraine and why Biden is willing to sacrifice the Ukrainian People down to the last man. Russia want justice for crimes against humanity via violations of the Biological Weapons Treaty, for which the punishment is death. I’ve been telling the world since the jump; Russia’s escalation in Ukraine is backlash for the US creation of C19. Ukraine and Covid are connected. Here is Russian General Igor Kirillov last summer, briefing the public on the US Biological network and Hunter Biden’s Metabiota.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The investment fund Rosemont Seneca, headed by Hunter Biden, is linked to the bio labs in Ukraine. The Russian Defense Ministry also implicates George Soros' Open Society Institute, the Ministry of Defense and Health of Ukraine, and the US Department of Threat Reduction. Rosemont Seneca is connected to MetaBioData and Black and Veatch, major suppliers of Pentagon Bio Lab Materials. Moscow claims these labs are associated with nuclear missile-related institutions and research organizations. The US denies these allegations, stating the labs are for research purposes. Ukraine acknowledges the existence of the labs and is collaborating with the US to prevent research materials from falling into Russian hands.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: United States, in particular, the investment fund Rosemont Seneca, which is headed by Hunter Biden. Speaker 1: Rosemont Seneca Partners is the firm tied to Hunter Biden, the US President's son. And the Russian Defense Ministry is listing, financial entities that are involved in these bio labs in Ukraine. Now, they also listed George Soros' Open Society Institute and Open Society Foundations, which are also involved with them and as well as the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine and the Ministry of Health of Ukraine, and the US Department of Threat Reduction. All of them seem to be tied in with these bio labs. And it appears that Rosemont Seneca Partners, the reason that they would be involved is because they have a relationship with MetaBioData and Black and Veatch, which are main suppliers of Pentagon Bio Lab Materials. Now, Moscow is also coming forward and saying that it appears These bio labs are connected, with institutions, and research organizations that are related to nuclear missiles. This is what was said. Speaker 0: The scale of the program is impressive. In addition to the military, the US Agencies For International Development, the George Soros Foundation, And the Center For Disease Prevention Control are directly involved in its implementation. Scientific supervision is carried out by leading research organizations, Including the Los Alamos National Laboratory, which developed nuclear weapons as part of the Manhattan Project. All these activities are carried out under the full control of the Pentagon. Speaker 1: Now the over 30 biolabs are accused by Russia of being involved in weapons development and trying to develop biological weapons. Now The USA denies this and insists they are simply research facilities, and we did hear acknowledgment of these facilities' existence from US under secretary, Victoria Nuland. Speaker 2: Ukraine has, biological research facilities. We are working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those Research materials from falling into the hands of, Russian forces, should they

@Resist_05 — Pelham

Posted - August 16, 2023 at 1:34 AM

Saved - August 16, 2023 at 3:51 AM

@Resist_05 - Pelham

Robert Kennedy Jr… “The war was never about Ukrainian freedom, it was regime change in Russia. None of those children had to die and we should seek a peace agreement.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

Biden and Austin admitted that the purpose of the war in Ukraine was not about Ukrainian freedom, but rather to exhaust the Russian army and engage in a proxy war. The US repeatedly prevented Zelensky from signing the Minsk Accords, which could have prevented the war. The speaker believes that the US deliberately provoked Russia and that the war could have been avoided. They argue that the US's actions have led to negative consequences, such as pushing Russia towards China and risking the dollar's status as the world reserve currency. Additionally, the speaker highlights the danger of provoking a nuclear superpower and questions why the conflict was not resolved peacefully from the start.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Biden was asked about what the purpose of the war was, he said regime change in Russia. When Lloyd Austin, his secretary of defense, was asked in April 2022, right after they blew up the agreement, why are we in Ukraine? He said to exhaust the Russian army and to create its capacity to of fight anywhere else in the world, that is not about Ukrainian freedom. It is about using Ukraine in a proxy war and a geopolitical dispute between 2 great powers. Are you saying that a United States falls on Russia invaded Ukraine? No. I said, no, I'm not. Vladimir I'm not making any excuse for Vladimir Putin. He is his. The invasion was illegal. It was brutal and he had other options. But did we deliberately provoke the action? Yes, we did. Again and again and again, we would not allow Zelensky to sign the Minsk Accords in 2019. Zelensky ran as the peace candidate, he was a he's a comedian. He's an actor, which I'm not disparaging because that's what my wife does, but he had never been in politics and he what he won was 70% of the vote. Why? Because he ran promising that he would sign the Minska courts which were already agreed to by Russia, by France, and by Germany, and then the United States, we, our White House, went over there, we would not let him sign. If we had let him sign, this war would have never happened and all those kids would be alive today. Of the building, he was wondering why do you think that another attempt to convince the court to be able to deal with? Said, I don't think the Russians, would agree to the men's decors today, but the men's decors didn't work before because we wouldn't let him work. The Russians were gonna let him work. Germany was going to, France and and and, and Zelensky was going to. Said, oh, they work for everybody except for the neocons in the white house who wanted this war. Did, I would negotiate with the Russians. What was that experience? Oh, I I wouldn't tell you. You're you you keep asking me questions that it would be crazy for me to answer. Said, you know, I I negotiate for a living. I've settled hundreds of lawsuits. You never tell them what you're gonna negotiate for before you negotiate. Of thought, I would say my answer to that is strategic ambiguity. Of decline. I I I would love to go to Ukraine. Mister Kennedy, I'm sorry. Of defense. Yeah. I I would but here's the thing. What you're saying is really important. Said, because the Russian group we are provoking, not only have we made the worst geopolitical mistake, which is to push the Russians took into an embrace of China, which is the worst geopolitical outcome that we we can imagine, we've essentially fueled the creation of bricks where 40 nations are now threatening to get off of of of the dollar as the as the world reserve currency, if that continues then, you know, what that will make the great depression look like a cakewalk for us. But the Russians also, most importantly, have more nukes than we do. They have at least a 1,000 more nuclear weapons than we do and they and many people argue that their weapons are much better than ours. That that they have any ballistic weapons that actually work. So there's not incoming missiles from the end of Russia and we and that ours are much inferior. Now why are we getting why are we provoking of war with the big with a nuclear superpower. Why are we settling this from the beginning?

@GregRubini — Greg Rubini

Posted - September 2, 2023 at 5:21 PM

Saved - September 4, 2023 at 3:46 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

In Ukraine, a conspiracy involving Joe Biden, Obama, John Kerry, McCain, and others planned a war against Russia since 2014. George Soros played a role in the 2014 CIA coup and funded protests. Now, Soros is allegedly running the show behind Joe Biden. Soros's influence extends globally, controlling election outcomes in various countries. Interestingly, there is a Jewish organization called "Jews Against Soros" opposing his leftist influence. It's time for people to stand up against Soros and his destructive agenda.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini

430,000 Ukrainian soldiers died. Thanks to Joe Biden, Obama, John Kerry, McCain, Lindsey "Linda" Graham, Nuland, Jake Sullivan (HRC puppet), Zelensky, the CIA, DoD. Zelensky prepared a new cemetery, which can hold 600,000 corpses. 1 Million dead is Joe Biden target.

Video Transcript AI Summary

In 2017, we will fight for our homeland and stand against Russian aggression. We are not against the Russian people, but against Putin. Our goal is to make sure your bravery is known to the American people and the world. We will take your calls to Washington and push the case against Putin. It's time for Russia to face a heavier price.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Yeah. The most I admire the fact that you will fight for your homeland. Your fight is our fight. 2017 will be the year of offense. All of us will go back to Washington, And we will push the case against Russia. Enough of our Russian aggression. It is time for them to pay a heavier price. Our fight is not with the Russian people but with Putin. Our promise to you is to take your calls to Washington. Inform the American people of your bravery. And make the case against Putin to the world.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini

2) Joe Biden, Nuland will fight until the last Ukrainian is dead. Listen to what Lindsey Graham said, in Dec. 2017: "2017 will be the year of offense" The War in Ukraine had been planned by those Warmongers since 2014. The target was to start the War against Russia in 2017.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini

3) 2014 was the year of the CIA Coup in Ukraine. Obama, Joe Biden, Nuland, Eric Ciaramella, John Kerry, John McCain were all involved in the Plan. along with John Brennan (CIA Director) and Hillary Clinton, of course.

Video Transcript AI Summary

As secretary of state, I was deeply involved in the effort to remove the prosecutor. The entire administration, including Obama, the vice president, and myself, worked towards this goal. We believed that Ukraine needed to get rid of the prosecutor in order to succeed in the revolution. I made it clear to them that if the prosecutor was not fired, they would not receive the $1,000,000,000. Eventually, the prosecutor was fired, and Ukraine was able to move forward.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I will tell you because as secretary of state, I was deeply involved in this. All of us in the administration were trying to get rid of that prosecutor. From Obama to the secretary of state to the vice president, all of us were working on that, the ambassador. And and We knew if Ukraine was going to survive and win the revolution in the end, the Maidan, they had to get rid of that prosecutor, and they did. Speaker 1: We're not going to give you the $1,000,000,000. They said, you have no authority, you're not the president. The president said I should call him. I said, I'm telling you, you're not getting $1,000,000,000. I said, you're not getting $1,000,000,000, I'm going to be leaving here, I think it was about 6 hours. I look, I said, leaving in 6 hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you're not getting the money. Oh, son of a bitch. You got fired. Speaker 0: Because as secretary of state, I was deeply involved in this. All of us in the administration, we're trying to get rid of that prosecutor. From Obama to the secretary of state to the vice president, all of us We're working on that. The ambassador and and we knew if Ukraine was gonna survive and win the revolution in the end, the Maidan, They had to get rid of that prosecutor, and they did.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini

4) Make no mistake: Jake Sullivan, the current National Security Advisor of Joe Biden is a puppet of Hillary Clinton. Actually, Jake Sullivan was the campaign manager of Hillary Clinton in 2016. The CIA Coup in Ukraine was planned when HRC was Sec. of State.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini

5) The plan to use 800,000 Ukrainian soldiers as cannon fodder against the Russians was - and is - a UniParty project. Here you have John McCain in 2014:

Video Transcript AI Summary

People of Ukraine, this is your moment. It's about the future you want and deserve for your country. A future in Europe, a future of peace with all your neighbors. The free world, America, and I stand with you. Your destiny lies in Europe.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: People of Ukraine, this is your moment. This is about you, no one said, this is about the future you want for your country. This is about the future you deserve. A future in Europe a future of peace my It is. With all of your neighbors. The free world is with you. America is with you. I am with you. And the destiny you seek lies in Europe.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini

6) The UniParty project in Ukraine: John McCain in Dec. 2016: (with Lindsey Graham, Klobuchar, Yovanovitch)

Video Transcript AI Summary

I believe you will win. We will provide everything you need to succeed. Our success is not due to equipment, but your courage. Thank you. The world is watching because we cannot let Vladimir Putin succeed here, as it would set a precedent for other countries.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I believe you will win. I am convinced you will win, and we will do everything we can to provide you with what you need to win. And we have succeeded not because of equipment, but because of your courage. So I thank you, and the world is watching And the world is watching because we cannot allow Vladimir Putin to succeed here, because if he succeeds here, he will succeed in other countries.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini

7) The UniParty War project in Ukraine: John McCain in Dec. 2016: (with Lindsey Graham, Klobuchar, Yovanovitch) with the then President of Ukraine, Petro Poroshenko

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini

8) and how is George Soros related to the War in Ukraine? Because George Soros helped Obama, Joe Biden and the CIA in the 2014 CIA Coup in Ukraine. Soros provided money, and "protestors" For this, George Soros is protected by the CIA, FBI, DOJ, DOD. @TuckerCarlson @elonmusk Footage of the bloody 2014 CIA Coup in Ukraine: (100 people killed by snipers)

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini

9) More footage of the bloody 2014 CIA Coup in Ukraine: (100 people killed by snipers): You may thank George Soros, Obama and Joe Biden for this.

Video Transcript AI Summary

There is a window facing us, and something is coming out of it. We need to leave. It's the window on the fifth row from the left, second from the top. Is it open?

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: What is that? What? That that window Yeah. Facing directly to us. Yeah. Okay. Get the fuck out of here. That is coming straight out of that window. That's 1. Up there. Help me. Yeah. I'll hook up. That window 1? Okay. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5th row from the left, 2nd from the top one. Who is it open?

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini

10) Do you still have doubts about George Soros involvement in Ukraine? just listen to the guy:

Video Transcript AI Summary

A foundation was set up in Ukraine before it became independent from Russia. Biden was involved in Ukraine and tried to convert Poroshenko into a democratic leader. They wanted to assist Ukraine in becoming a united country. They asked for prompt action and an aid package, including a $1 billion loan guarantee, to support reform. Biden had a commitment from Poroshenko and Yatsenyuk to take action against a state prosecutor, but they didn't follow through. Biden threatened to withhold the $1 billion if the prosecutor wasn't fired, saying, "If the prosecutor is not fired, you're not getting the money."

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Set up a foundation in Ukraine before Ukraine became independent of Russia. And the foundation has been functioning ever since. There is 1 person who was very did the involved in Ukraine, and and that's Biden. He had a lot more patience than I and trying to convert Speaker 1: Poroshenko into a democratic leader. But the opportunity to generate a united Ukraine, getting it right It's within your grasp. We want to be your partner, your friend in the project. We want to and we're ready to assist. Speaker 2: We're also asking To act promptly to deliver on an aid package including a $1,000,000,000 loan guarantee That can help smooth the path for reform inside of Ukraine and give the prime minister and his government the capacity do what they need to do. Speaker 3: And I had gotten a commitment from Poroshenko and from Yatsenyuk that they would take action against State prosecutor and they didn't. So they said, they had, they're walking out to press conference and said, no, I said, I'm not going to, we're not going to give you the $1,000,000,000. They said, you have no authority, you're not the President. The President said, I said, call him. I said, I'm telling you, you're not getting $1,000,000,000. I said, you're not getting the $1,000,000,000, I'm going to be leaving here. I think it was about 6 hours. I looked at it, I said, we're leaving in 6 hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you're not getting the money. Oh, son of a bitch.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini

11) Do you understand now why George Soros is protected by the CIA, FBI, DOJ, DOD?

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini

12) And who funded the "protestors" here in the US, in the summer of 2020? Remember? The so-called "George Floyd protests"... Guess who? George Soros. Just like he did in Ukraine in 2014. Those "protests" were STAGE 2 of the Coup against Trump. Notice any similarities?

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini

13) We all know that Joe Biden is just a de*mented puppet. Don't we? So... Who is really running the US? Who is really running the show, since Jan. 2021? cc: Col. Doug Macgregor @DougAMacgregor @KariLake @SarahPalinUSA

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini

14) Col. Doug Macgregor @DougAMacgregor has the answer: "Joe Biden is not in charge of anything" "There are powerful forces behind him" "I have been told that George Soros is running the show" at 26:30

Video Transcript AI Summary

Colonel Douglas McGregor discusses the Russia-Ukraine war and the efforts of the Biden administration to make it difficult for a future president to exit long-term military support deals with Ukraine. McGregor believes that both Republicans and Democrats are invested in prolonging the proxy war for their own benefit. He suggests three ways the war could end: the Russians pressing further into Ukraine, a financial and economic crisis, or European countries breaking away from the US and NATO. McGregor emphasizes the need for leaders like Donald Trump or Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to suspend aid to Ukraine, withdraw military personnel, and engage in meaningful dialogue with Russia to negotiate an end to the conflict. He also highlights the corruption and dysfunction within the US government and the urgent need for change.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Okay. I have with me today Colonel Douglas McGregor. We're going to be talking about the Russia Ukraine war. We're going to talk about what the White House is doing to try to pigeonhole the next president into the war that Biden wants against Vladimir Putin. Colonel MacGregor. Thank you so much for coming on today. Speaker 1: Sure. Speaker 0: So, you probably saw this reports in the news that the White House is looking for ways to make it extremely difficult to get out of the Russia Ukraine war. How does the Biden administration plan to make it difficult for a future president to exit long term military support deals with Ukraine as we're reading in The Wall Street Journal? Speaker 1: Well, I think this is a really important topic because It actually is in a more in a broader sense about how do we end this catastrophe and what effectively it's not just president Biden, by the way. This is a bipartisan effort by what I call the Uniparty because he's got support from Republicans and Democrats in great numbers to keep this destructive and pointless proxy war against Russia going as long as possible. Now he's ultimately interested or at least his supporters are or his managers or handlers, whatever you wanna call it, to keep this thing going in perpetuity. I mean, this is a cash cow, sadly, for a lot of the wrong people in Washington. A friend of mine pointed out to me the other day. He said, Doug, have you taken a ride around Washington, D. C, drive through Potomac, Maryland and then over to Great Falls and McLean and so forth and see the enormous estates, mansions, whatever you wanna call them that have sprung up in these areas largely as a consequence of this Unending series of interventions and wars. These are people that have operated within the broader framework of the military industrial Congressional complex, and they've stuffed huge quantities of cash into their pockets. Ukraine promises to keep a lot of that going. Although just as, an aside, in case for some reason the cash cow called Ukraine stops producing, we've always got China and, the imminent threat to Taiwan, which, of course, is nonsense. So these things are all part and parcel of the same thing. How do we sustained this $28,000,000,000 here, $30,000,000,000 there that pays people very, very well inside the of Defense and the Pentagon and the Defense Industries and so forth. It justifies lots of pointless headquarters and 4 stars and so on. First of all, it doesn't matter what he does because you can undo executive arrangements overnight. This is not a a treaty that was approved by the senate that then becomes law. So whatever whatever he thinks he's doing when he signs something as an executive agreement, those things can be overturned in 24 hours with New president. So I I don't see that as as ominous as others would see it. I think it gets to this issue of Washington doesn't want to end this conflict, which is very foolish and very dangerous. So then the next question is, how does it end? Well, I think it ends in 3 ways. First of all, the Russians who have been very deliberate and very cautious about moving forward against Ukrainians, in the hopes that someone with The common sense would come forward and negotiate an end to this, finally conclude. Well, that's hopeless. They press all the way to the Dnieper River. They they press right into Kyiv, and they cross the river in the south and take Odesa because they see no alternative. And even then, if there's no willingness to come to some sort of arrangement, well, then they call up another 4, 500,000 troops, And they go all the way to the Polish and Romanian borders. So that's one way this could end. The second way that it ends is financial economic crisis. We have a lot it's interesting to watch the news this morning and the usual suspects on the various cable news networks are saying, oh, what a great week in the stock market. Well, I'm sure it was a very good week, but what they don't bother telling anybody is that we are as close to the kind of 29 disaster as we have ever made in our history. And all of a sudden, all these great gains in the so called stock market would be wiped out in the space of a few minutes. Now why? Everyone will come forward with a different theory, but the bond yields are up, the prices are down. And at some point, massive numbers of banks, both inside the United States and around the world, We're going to look at all these treasury bonds that they invested in 20 years ago when the interest rates were very, very low and discover that, gosh, they're worthless. How do I get rid of these damn things? And when that happens, you're gonna have a fire sale like nobody's ever And that will produce an implosion in the financial system. Now, some people will step forward and say, well, look, this happened to the British Not long ago, I guess, in the spring in March. And, the Bank of England said, no, no, no, no. We'll buy up whatever is necessary. And they managed to get past the crisis. Well, the same conditions that applied to Great Britain a few months ago still apply there and they apply here, And you're not going to be able to get past it. And we cannot simply buy up all these bonds. It's just not possible. Now you add to this the toxic debt that is already on the Fed's spreadsheets and balance. And then go even further. Look at the banks around the country. The Silicon Valley Bank was just the beginning. We've had more banks fail. We continue to hear that more banks are failing. At some point, all of it fails. Now then you ask someone like Nassim Taleb. This is the gentleman that invented the concept of the black swan. When does it all happen? He'll look at you, and he said, well, Armageddon is in view, but I can't tell you when it's gonna happen. Yeah. I can't either, But it's very definitely there. And you have also these other exogenous forces, things beyond the United States, like the Ukraine war. What happens in Ukraine doesn't seem to matter very much to most Americans. But let me tell you something. The Russians press ahead and crush everything and then start moving west, that will have a big impact in Europe and that impact will be filled here. And Europeans are ultimately more fragile in the economic and financial sense, As you know than we are. Germany and France really are the most important states in Europe. Germany is already in a deep recession, And there's no easy way out of it. They they've been on a path of national suicide now from the moment they decided to join this anti Russian proxy war. I don't see an easy way for them to get out. France is obvious. France is a seething boiling pot of anger and hostility because millions of non Europeans have flooded into that country and threatened the very existence of France, not just French national identity, French history and culture, but France, the nation state itself. The rest of Europe is watching. And you know what they always say about Paris. When Paris costs, the rest of Europe gets a cold. And I think you're going to see something very much like that occur. So To briefly sum up, that's another way the war ends. Everybody just goes broke overnight, Cuts their losses and gets out. And the Europeans are already pulling back. We are not because, frankly, $28,000,000,000 is decimal dust to us. When you have a $34,000,000,000,000 debt and you're almost up to 120% debt to GDP ratio, what difference does another $28,000,000,000 make. That's where we are. So that's one way. And then there's another way. And, this is one that everybody wants, but no one can find evidence for it. And that is that if someone steps forward either leading Europe or even here in the United says we want an off ramp. We wanna end this. Well, I don't see that happening in Washington. So the only other way this happens is if the Europeans break away from us. And, of course, that would mean fundamentally the end of NATO. You've already got the EU on life support. Everybody hates the EU. You can find different reasons in every country. The Germans don't like it because they're tired of being the cash cow for Europe, But everybody else in Europe likes to blame the Germans for all of their problems. So this is a it's a bizarre set of circumstances, but everybody's fed up with the EU. And this is why no one in Washington and certainly none of the current governments in Europe are willing to step forward and make peace because to do so is an existential threat to them. They're they are at war with the Russian state and the Russian people. The rest of us are not. They're at war because they've decided that Russia, this last nation state left in Europe that won't open its borders to millions of non Europeans and and non Christians. They do have 20, 25% Muslims, But those Muslims are overwhelmingly very content to live in Russia. And by the way, that's not new. In 1915, the Turks thought they were gonna launch an Islamist crusade and liberate all the Muslims from czars Russia. They crossed the Caucasus and found no one was interested in being liberated Because the people were quite content to live under the czar. We have a similar situation today in Moscow. But the point is that Russia is not going to knuckle under. It's not going to bow down to our financial hegemony. It's not going to tolerate our military hegemony. It's not going to accommodate our political dominance. So the only way this ends in the third sense is for the Europeans to step forward and say enough's enough. And of course, that's something we don't want. But frankly, I think we're doing everything in our power to make that happen. Speaker 0: Yes. A mutual friend between us, Max Blumenthal of The Gray Zone. He had mentioned in an interview with me that as he drives around Washington DC. It's just these McMansions going up everywhere. And as you dig in and research, they're almost all connected to the military industrial complex. So, he says, on the one hand, they're flying the Ukrainian flag. On the other hand, if that war stops, they can't pay their mortgage. So like they have more incentive to keep this thing going. The other thing that stood out to me in the last week was I had Ray McGovern on. And he said, whether it's true or not, Russia has to be America's boogeyman or you can't justify an $800,000,000,000 military budget. What are your thoughts on mister McGovern's comment? Speaker 1: Well, Ray is a great person and he makes great points, but he's wrong. Speaker 0: Okay. Speaker 1: Eliminate Russia from the equation, and you have China. Speaker 0: Okay. Well, then just get a new boogeyman. Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, that that's it. And, you know, all the time, people say, you always just don't understand China. And I always say, how many times have you been to northeast Asia? How many people do you know in the region? What's your knowledge of Chinese history, culture, and civilization? The the Chinese are probably the oldest continuous civilization on the planet. Where is the evidence for all of the sinister motives and designs that you're imputing to them? I don't see it. If you look carefully at China today, it's pretty much where it was in the beginning of 20th century. It's expanded to the limits of its capabilities. It can't expand any further. They've got 1,400,000,000 people. Every morning, Xi does not wake up and think of ways to attack America. Xi wakes up every morning thinking of ways to hold China together. I I don't think people understand that, and they wanna blame the Chinese for Fentanyl. Well, the Chinese are making it and selling it, and in many cases, it's Chinese organized crime. And in a nation of 1,400,000,000 that has a long, long history of criminality and what I would call black market operations, pretty tough to crack down on all of that and hold it together. But in in the case of China right now, the Stuff is coming into the United States via the drug cartels that operate out of Mexico and the Caribbean basin. Those are your problem, not China. Speaker 2: Hey, there. It's Steven Gardner. I'm so sorry to interrupt this important interview. But if you have a mortgage, I wanna tell you there's a better way to pay that house off in 7 years or less. You need to meet with one of my coaches over at replace your mortgage, where they will show you how to pay that house off in 7 years or less using the same income you have right now. We all know that for most people, buying a house is their biggest investment, yet banking products are systematically designed to make banks wealthy. I want to help you be wealthy and get debt free even faster. So I'll leave a link down below for that. Go check it out. Okay. Let's get back to this interview. Speaker 1: So you shut down the border, secure the border, and restore the rule of law inside the United States. Stop this nonsense of releasing criminals and Slapping people on their hands who probably should be executed, frankly, and instead install a government that protects the people. Remember, government has to do 3 things. It has protect the population, has to shelter the population, has to feed the population. Xi is doing that. Putin is doing that. Our government is not doing that. It's not protecting us in the least. All you have to do is open the newspapers, watch cable television, you'll get a fraction of what's actually happening. But the criminality in our country is is epidemic. I mean, you go to a gas station in Philadelphia, you're lucky you're not being shot on the spot. You know, you try to shop. You can't. The place is being looted. All the major stores are leaving. Look at San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago, Philadelphia. It's it's terrible, but no one wants you to look at that. It's almost though don't pay any attention to that. Look at the threat from Russia. Look at the threat from China. But the truth is Ukraine is of no strategic vital interest to us, never has been, and the regime sitting in Kyiv is hardly the the paragon of liberal democracy. It's the opposite. It's it's worse than that. It's almost Stalinist at this point, and it's an organized crime state. It was when the war began. So this is all nonsense. But, you know, Max is correct. People are profiting enormously from it, and they don't think it harms them. But then there's this other possibility, and that is that we're dumb. We do stupid things, and we try to intervene in Western Ukraine at the last minute try and rescue our credibility, which is already in the gutter anyway with most of the world. And we bring on a major war with the Russians. What we don't understand right now is that we have threatened and bullied the Chinese for years to the point where the Chinese have convinced themselves. They've got to prepare to defend themselves against us and our attacks. So what are they going to do? Well, they're going to join with the Russians. So now you're in a in a war that involves not simply the Russian state and its armed forces, which are, by the way, better and more capable than China's, but, nevertheless, you know, you've got Chinese scientific industrial power and manpower Linked to Russia. And what about the rest of the world? All you have to do is look at BRICS. Look at the recent acquisitions of BRICS. You know, Saudi Arabia, whose importance to us cannot be overstated when it comes to the petrodollar. Saudi Arabia has just announced, Ron, we're joining BRICS. They plan to join this new gold backed currency. What's happening to our financial hegemony? It's being eroded away as we sit here and talk. The world is going to dedollarize. It's not gonna happen overnight. It won't happen in 6 months. It'll happen in a year, in 2 years, in 3 years with the handwritings on the wall. Why? Everyone is sick of us. So Max is right, but it's even worse than Max suggests. We've created this whole ruling political class that is entirely dependent on governmental laws. Yes. It's in their interest to do these things. And that's why when I've talked to people, I said, how do you explain the open borders. I mean, what what what the hell is going on? Why would we do such a thing? Why would we invite millions of people into this country From all sorts of places. No longer just Latin America. We have a third of the Mexican population or more living in the country anyway. But you go beyond that now. You're picking up people from Africa, the Middle East, the Indian subcontinent, Asia. Why? Why? Why? Well, it tends to create the illusion or at least the possibility that you and I and other Americans like us could never win another election, That our population is so diluted by all of these non Americans that have been welcomed into our country that we have no chance of ever governing ourselves again. We will be governed by this political class who's resting comfortably on the foundation of all these foreigners. This is a very dangerous thing that bodes ill for the future of the United States because at some point, when things get rough and people can't eat, Americans are not different from Frenchmen or Germans or anyone else. They start to look around and say, wait a minute. Why can't I find something to eat because this man over here He's not even an American. What he's competing for the same thing I am. Why is he here? Why does he enjoy rights? This is why I brought up the fact that all of these so called migrants, illegals, whatever you wanna call them, asylum seekers, which is a lot of nonsense, Who are being allowed into the country are handed $2,200 a month. Then they're told, here's a ticket to wherever you wanna go in the United States, we'll send you there. But we won't pay or cannot pay the average American worker who works all of his life and pays into Social Security more than about 1400 a month. What's wrong with this picture? This is insane. So this ruling class in Washington needs to go away. The problem is that how do you get rid of them? How do you dispose of them? How do you drive them out of power? That's what has to happen. We've got to do that. And Americans have to wake up and understand this 2 party business is an illusion. They're all in it together. I mean, for everybody like Chip Roy We're Andy Biggs. There are 10 or 20 others in the house that are part of the problem. For every Rand Paul or Mike Lee, There are another 10 or 20 senators who are part of the problem. And they don't understand why Mike Lee and Rand Paul and Chip Roy and any bigs aren't standing in line with their hands out To cash in. They don't get it. So this is an insoluble problem at the moment, but it will be solved because other things that we can't predict, this Armageddon that Nassim Taleb talks about in the financial sector. The fact that We say we're doing really well economically. Well, then what are all these tent cities filled with homeless for? You know, what's happening there. What about salaries and and the wages? What about housing? You know, I listened to RFK Jr mentioned that, you know, we're reaching a point where the average American can't afford a home. I mean, the interest rates are going up and up and up, and he can't possibly come up with the cash. But there's a savior in the background Called the bankers. They have lots of cash. They're buying up the homes. And pretty soon, I think they expect that all of us will become happy serfs on their plantations and will live in houses they own and we pay them to live there. This is bad news. This can't go on. This is un American. All of these things are going to contribute to the end of this catastrophe in Ukraine. And when it ends, it's going to end for all of these reasons, not just what's happening over on the ground, because clearly the war is over. People are now finally saying, you know, MacGregor, you were right. You told the truth, 400,000 dead Ukrainians. Ukrainians themselves had accidentally admitted to that when they were saying that we have to celebrate the great contributions of all these patriotic heroes and mention 400,000 dead. Now that's more dead than we sustained during 3 years of fighting in World War II. Think about it. And most of our losses were against the Germans, an army that had no tactical air cover It was already torn between multiple fronts trying to keep the Soviet military machine from destroying what was left of western civilization. So Who are we kidding? This this is this is not going to last. This can't go on. Everything will change, But it's not gonna change because someone orchestrates it and stands up and says, stop. I mean, I wish someone would tell the truth and say, well, you know, we need to restructure our debt. Oh, no. No. No. That's defaulting. Well, it's also called restructuring. FDR did it twice while he was president. We need to do it. We can't go on because the interest rates are no longer truly under Jerome Powell's control. You know, he he made some ridiculous statement from Wyoming saying, well, there's always uncertainty when you're trying to predict events, and it's a cloudy day overhead. You are the Fed chairman, and this is what you're telling us? Speaker 0: The weather report. Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, this whole this whole thing is a facade. It's all gonna fall apart, but we just don't know exactly when. And until then, you're gonna be told by your government, don't worry. Be happy. Go shop. Spend money. Well, I think there was a Statement from one of my favorite movies, what was it called, Dodgeball? Bold strategy, Cotton, let's see how that works out. I think that's where we're headed. Speaker 0: Okay. How might somebody like Donald Trump or Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Approach ending the war and approach communicating with Putin, compared to like Joe Biden, who he would rather be on vacation than try to communicate with another global leader. What what, can you imagine what their approach might be to ending this war? Speaker 1: Sure. The first thing that either of them has to do Without even calling Moscow or anyone else is call Kyiv and simply say, Gentlemen, if you wanna use that term to describe them, I would not. We are suspending aid to you immediately, And we are withdrawing all US military personnel and support personnel and contractors in and out of uniform immediately. Now once you do those 2 things, the Russians will talk to you. Speaker 0: Mhmm. K. Speaker 1: Then you can say, I'm calling Moscow. And you can ask and say, look, these are the decisions I made. Let's wait for 2 weeks, and you will see what we have essentially ordered actually happens because the Russians aren't going to take it seriously until they see real action. Those are not just signals. Those are dramatic actions that say, we want to end this conflict. Then the Russians will talk to you. And when you go in to talk to the Russians, you have to take a seat, drink some coffee or tea and whatever they decide to give you, and then listen to the Russians. All of this has happened because we refused to listen to anyone in Moscow for decades. This, of course, was George Kennan's argument. Listen to the Russians. You may not always understand them, but if you listen carefully, they will their position and why. Now you can accept it or you can leave it. But at that point, I think there's a chance to negotiate an end to this terrible, terrible, terrible tragedy. But we can't go in there and stipulate conditions. We can't make demands Because this war is over. It's been lost. Now will we go in and try to rescue this thing with military power? I think that would be a huge Disaster for us. I don't see anything good coming forward, and I don't see anything good in Europe happening. Speaker 0: Yeah. That's my worry is, as you mentioned earlier, we try to go in and rescue Western Ukraine and get ourselves pulled into something that we don't want to be a part of versus telling Western Ukraine, we're done. You guys can continue to fight this on your own, but we want this other nuclear superpower to see that we are retreating, we're creating space, and then we're going to come in with our hands shown, no weapons, and we're going to have a discussion and end this war. I don't think Biden wants to do that. He shows 0 signals, but meanwhile Donald Trump and RFK Jr, they're saying things like, that's exactly what I would do first, right. RFK Jr. Said, I would immediately try to get Putin on the phone. Everyone I've ever had to sue in court has been an enemy, but we've always been able to communicate, we've always been able to see each other's side while we work through a problem, and that seems to be the kind of leadership that the Americans are looking for, and yet we're stuck with this guy who just can't can't find his way off a stage almost. It's it's embarrassing at this Speaker 1: point. Well, I don't think he's in charge of much of anything. I think there are powerful forces behind him on the left. I sometimes refer to them as leftist oligarchs. I've had people tell me that from the very beginning, George Soros has being effectively the shadow national security adviser. So this is the worst possible poison to pour into anyone's ear inside the White House. But I wouldn't use the word retreat. If you do that, everyone has a heart attack. Oh, we've lost. Well, I've got news for you. We lost Vietnam. That we lost there because it was a very dumb idea. We were 6, 7, 8, 9000 miles from home. We were fighting in a war we didn't even understand. We're doing the same thing now. This is 6, 7, 8000 miles away. We don't understand what's really at the heart of this, never did. Don't care. Our interest was this sort of absurd goal of remove Putin from office, destroy the Russian state, then strip it of its resources and make it part of our utopian western world, Thanks to globalism. No, thanks. It's not gonna happen. It hasn't worked in Western Europe. It's not working very well here. So you can you can get on the phone and call them. They're not gonna pay any attention to what you say. They're going to look at what you do, and that's why I say the first thing you've gotta do, Suspend the aid. Pull out all of your uniformed or civilian contractors, military advisers, you name it. Get them out. Then I think the Russians would be happy to sit down and talk, but you've got to listen to what they say. It's not a question of RFK Junior Or Donald Trump walking in with a solution. They can try, but it's you really gotta let the Russians state their position And what their minimal requirements are, because you're probably going to have to accept them unless you want to declare war and broaden this tragedy unnecessarily. Speaker 0: Okay, 2 more questions, then I'll let you go. I appreciate your time. These last 2 are a tiny bit political, so I'll try to keep it military, but we have a sitting president who, while Vice President, had multiple fake emails. Front page of the daily news yesterday was that they found 5,400 emails between him and his son Hunter and other foreign leaders. Now today, they found 1,000 emails between Vice President Biden's email address and Hunter Biden's law firm asking for favors, needs, upcoming events, why on earth would a vice president need to operate incognito using fake names and emails. It does not make any sense. Speaker 1: Well, he needs to do it because his actions are illegal. That's the easy answer to the question. He's aggrandizing himself and his family through governmental influence and instrumentalities. That's fundamentally illegal and unacceptable. But remember that Washington as this stagnant swamp of corruption. I mean, for anybody to stand up with the exception of people like Rand Paul or Mike Glee or, as I said, Chip Roy or Andy Biggs and say, this is a disgrace would be a joke because these people are hypocrites. Ever hear of something called insider trading? How do people show up worth a couple of 1,000 or maybe $1,000,000 and walk out years later with 10, 15, 20,000,000. Well, gosh, by insider trading. People come and give them tips where they call up and say, hey, what do you think? Oscar, auto, Max, what should I where should I put my money? Well, if you don't do this, you're gonna make a lot of money. Okay. And then somebody says, well, are you engaged? Absolutely not. I would never do that. So it's a big case of the pot calling the kettle black. We don't know how many people on the hill Are also involved with Biden. We it's probably a snake pit, with lots of snakes wriggling around in it. This is the problem with the system. At some point, every governmental structure breaks down. At some point, the system fails. We're at failure. The Americans haven't noticed because the checks continue to arrive. As long as the checks are cut and the food stamps are provided, everybody says, oh, well, I guess everything must be okay. No. It's not okay. You know, we think we've recovered from the problems we had with, you know, food chains and distribution chains, supply chains. Forget it. They're still out there. And our position overseas is more vulnerable than it's ever been. You look at the energy sector, this administration has done just about everything it possibly could to destroy it. And this is the problem for an RFK junior or Donald j Trump. They get in. They win. So it's gonna take a decade to recover from the damage we've done to ourselves. Now admittedly, a lot of this damage has accumulated over 30 years. I could take you back to the Clinton era and show you where the damage really took off. For that matter, we can go back to the Reagan years where the suddenly exporting jobs and manufacturing overseas really got started. It was Reagan who declared amnesty on the assumption, well, we'll do this onetime amnesty and then everything will get better. Well, the onetime amnesty was an invitation to 1,000,000 more to come to the United States. So this this has, these are old problems. What's happened over the last two and a half years is the cancer has metastasized. You've gone from something that could, could be eliminated or treated effectively to this massive cancer that's infecting the entire body politic, our economy, and the financial system. Everything is sick. How do you cure it? Well, you cure it quickly if you're willing to adopt very harsh measures. No one right now will accept harsh measures, But people do accept harsh measures when their lives tank, when they're miserable, when they don't have enough to eat, they can't care for their families. That's when things change. We're a we're a little away from that, but I would not say we're far from it. And, again, I urge people, travel around the country. Look at the food banks. How do we keep these food banks full? The food banks are vital and essential. I live 65 miles west of Washington DC. The food banks out here are emptied routinely. We all put food in, and there's so many people that need it. They show up. That's not that far from the nation's capital. What's it like 600 miles from here? It's a lot worse. You know, the Washington bubble is is a menace. If you live in it, you think, oh, everything's fine. I'm fine. People are fine. Look how happy they are. Right? It's it's not the case. Speaker 0: I remember billionaire Peter Thiel said one time, he said, they keep you traffic on your phone, so you don't realize the roads and the subways haven't been fixed in 50 years. It's like, okay, we can't do these hardware updates, but we'll just keep you distracted with software updates. Speaker 1: Why You've got the ruins of empire Yeah. Here and in Great Britain. I mean, when I first started going over to Great Britain, I was astonished at the shoddy infrastructure, the rail lines and so forth. You know, I grew up in North Philadelphia, and I routinely rode on the Pennsylvania and Reading railroads, and then, ultimately, I ended up on this Metro Rail nonsense. All of that is antiquated. You pick up your cell phone, you're still reliant on towers everywhere. In China, it's satellite based. In Japan, in Korea, satellite based. Why are we behind this? When Obama launched this infrastructure bill, one of the first things that came up in all the discussions in government and in the military was, we need to bury the power lines. There shouldn't be any power lines visible above ground. It's an essential national security thing. And while we're at it, we've got to fix the electrical grid. What did we do? Nothing. Where'd the money go? Campaign supporters? Donors? I mean, this is out of control. It's got to stop. The Romans had a term for this kind of situation. Is called state of exception. And during a state of exception, they would appoint initially 2 consuls, later on just 1. And everyone would agree that for the sake of the Roman state and its survival, everyone would now do what the leader said. In other words, the normal business approaches, the normal laws were all suspended because things were so bad that if we did not adopt emergency measures, The Roman state would fail. I think we're already in the state of exception. So when do we declare it? And where how do we rescue ourselves from this terrible situation. That's why, you know, I I think the world of Donald Trump, I think very highly of RFK Jr. These are solid people, good human beings. They want to do the right thing. Their instincts are good. How much can they reasonably achieve within the framework of the status quo system? And I think people are wrong if they think, oh, well, if we elect him, he'll save us. What's he gonna do about congress? Congress doesn't want us to be saved. Congress is very happy with the conditions it enjoys right now. That's our problem. And it's not just congress. Look at the judicial system. Look at the courts. You know? Who in their right mind would have ever thought that the judge appointed to decide the case on Donald Trump would be someone who has a long track record Of commitment to Marxism and revolutionary, socialism, but that's what you've got. You've got people that utterly hate everything that is American. They littered the judiciary. Many of them showed up under Obama, but there were already some there. This has been building for a long time. So we've got serious problems within the framework of government. I don't know how you solve it quickly. So whoever is elected, God bless them because they are sailing this ship of state into the biggest storm it has faced in its history, certainly, since World War II and some would argue since the Civil War. Speaker 0: Yes. Well, I know you and others are trying to improve the country one day at a time. You've got a new organization out. The website is our country, our voice.com. I'll make sure to leave a link down below. Can you tell us a little bit about that and then we'll wrap up? Speaker 1: Well, this is an organization that costs nothing to join. That's important for people to know. And our long term plan is to have representatives all over Country working with other organizations that are like minded, organizations that believe as we do, first and foremost, in god, country, and family. That's effectively our motto. We want to focus like a laser on the really big issues that need to be solved to save this country, And we hope that lots of people will join us. We've been very, very pleased with the overwhelming response. And keep in mind, this is a platform that other organizations can join, that they can use. Our plan is to make this platform usable for other like minded organizations. We are not associated with the Democrat or Republican parties. We have nothing to do with the RNC and the DNC. This is a purely American operation. We are all Americans first. We want to solve these problems as Americans for Americans. So anybody out there that's listening to this, Please go to that website, look it over, and if you're comfortable, join it. And eventually, we do pay plan to pay people to work on the ground in our various congressional districts and states for the right candidates. And what I mean by that is we want people to know what these people we vote for actually stand for. Because in many cases, I don't know how often I run into it, We elect someone from a particular district and the man's a nightmare or the woman is. Whatever we elected them to do, have no intention of doing. A good example of that is Bob Goode that ultimately won here in the western end of Northern Virginia and Southern Virginia in a very large congressional district, But we had to rid ourselves of the previous incumbent Republican who, behaved like a Hillary Clinton disciple, ran on 1 platform and did something else. We've got to stop this sort of thing. So to that extent, we're going to try and provide people with the truth. And again, Democrats who agree with us, who believe in god, country, and family are welcome. We want them. You know, this business of, well, you know, the Democrats. No. The Democratic Party has long since left most of its constituents just as the Republican Party has. Between us, we can win if we unite, and I think it's possible. Speaker 0: Right. Thank you very much, Colonel McGregor, for spending time with us today and I will make sure to put that website down below. Thank you again for coming on.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini

15) The entire interview with Col. Doug Macgregor at #14 is worth to watch: Pearls of Wisdom "400,000 dead Ukrainian soldiers" "Ukraine is an Organized Crime State" @DougAMacgregor I've been following Col. MacGregor, and watching his interviews, since Feb. 2022 Col. MacGregor has been a Military Advisor of President Trump in 2020

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini

16) Col. Doug MacGregor MUST be appointed Secretary of Defense by President Trump in the next administration - since Jan. 20, 2025 Col. MacGregor is the only one who has the proper credentials, and is 100% a True Patriot. @realDonaldTrump @DonaldJTrumpJr Don't you agree?

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini

17) George Soros said: "I’ve made my life’s mission to destroy the USA. I hate this country and I hate all of the people in it" and now this monster is running the show... (using Joe Biden as his puppet) How do you feel about it?

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini

18) by the way: George Soros is NOT an American. He was born in Hungary. and his real name is NOT George Soros: his real name is Gyorgy Schwartz and this monster is hellbent on destroying the USA. How do you feel about it?

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini

19) Kari Lake @KariLake , you should know this: Katie Hobbs got $1.75 Million from George Soros, through an "action group" named LUCHA: The thug who STOLE your Governor seat is another George Soros puppet. Source: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/arizonas-katie-hobbs-backed-by-group-that-wants-to-defund-police-abolish-border-protection

Arizona's Katie Hobbs backed by group that wants to defund police, abolish border protection Arizona Secretary of State and Democratic gubernatorial nominee Katie Hobbs has received backing from group that repeatedly called to defund police and abolish border patrol. foxnews.com

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini

20) All the indictments against President Trump are related - in one way or another - to George Soros. (Joe Biden is a Soros puppet) George Soros played an important role in the 2020 Election Fraud which threw Trump from the Oval Office.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini

21) George Soros funded AntiFa and BLM with Millions of dollars. George Soros is involved in orchestrating the January 6 Trap, along with Nancy Pelosi, the FBI, DHS and the DNC. Do you see the pattern? Kiev, Ukraine 2014 and Jan. 6, 2021, Wash DC: any similarity?

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini

22) Ukraine 2014 and January 6: any similarity? Orchestrated disorders, to trigger a Coup d'Etat (after an Election) ...in both cases. ...courtesy of George Soros in both cases.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini

23) George Soros: an octopus with many tentacles...

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini

24) do you see the Pattern? Do you see how it is all tied together? - Ukraine, Arizona, Georgia - the AntiFa riots of 2020 - the Election Fraud of 2020 (The Coup) - the Jan. 6 trap - the bogus indictments of President Trump and at the center of it all: George Soros.

Video Transcript AI Summary

A foundation was set up in Ukraine before it became independent from Russia, and it has been functioning since then. Biden was involved in Ukraine and tried to convert Poroshenko into a democratic leader. They wanted to help Ukraine become united and offered assistance. They also asked for prompt action to deliver an aid package, including a $1 billion loan guarantee, to support reform in Ukraine. Biden had gotten a commitment from Poroshenko and Yatsenyuk to take action against a state prosecutor, but they didn't follow through. Biden threatened to withhold the $1 billion if the prosecutor wasn't fired, and expressed frustration with the situation.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Set up a foundation in Ukraine before Ukraine became independent of Russia. And the foundation has been functioning ever since. There is 1 person who was very did the involved in Ukraine, and and that's Biden. He had a lot more patience than I and trying to convert Speaker 1: Poroshenko into a democratic leader. But the opportunity to generate a united Ukraine, getting it right It's within your grasp. We want to be your partner, your friend in the project. We want to and we're ready to assist. Speaker 2: We're also asking To act promptly to deliver on an aid package including a $1,000,000,000 loan guarantee That can help smooth the path for reform inside of Ukraine and give the prime minister and his government the capacity do what they need to do. Speaker 3: And I had gotten a commitment from Poroshenko and from Yatsenyuk that they would take action against State prosecutor and they didn't. So they said, they had, they're walking out to press conference and said, no, I said, I'm not going to, we're not going to give you the $1,000,000,000. They said, you have no authority, you're not the President. The President said, I said, call him. I said, I'm telling you, you're not getting $1,000,000,000. I said, you're not getting the $1,000,000,000, I'm going to be leaving here. I think it was about 6 hours. I looked at it, I said, we're leaving in 6 hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you're not getting the money. Oh, son of a bitch.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini

25) Do you know who controls the outcome of the Elections in: - California (Los Angeles) - Arizona - Georgia - Brazil - Argentina - Mexico - Australia - London (UK) - Norway - Belgium - Estonia - Honduras George Soros.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini

26) Interestingly, in Israel they despise George Soros, and they consider Soros an anti-semite from "The Times of Israel": https://www.timesofisrael.com/chikli-doubles-down-on-soros-attacks-despite-criticism-rhetoric-is-antisemitic/

Chikli doubles down on Soros attacks despite criticism rhetoric is antisemitic Foreign Ministry said to have intervened ahead of Diaspora minister's visit to Canada next week after Ottawa complained he was only meeting far-right representatives timesofisrael.com

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini

27) There is even a Jewish Organization named: "Jews Against Soros". This is what they say: “We are Jews who have had enough of George Soros and his malign, leftist influence on American politics” Their website: https://jewsagainstsoros.com/

Home - Jews Against Soros We are Jews who have had enough of George Soros and his malign, leftist influence on politics. We are Jews who are also sick and tired of the left accusing anyone who criticizes Soros of being antisemitic. jewsagainstsoros.com

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini

28) Fox News article on the Jewish Organization named "Jews Against Soros": https://www.foxnews.com/politics/activists-launch-jews-against-soros-oppose-mega-donors-radical-left-wing-influence

Activists launch Jews Against Soros to oppose mega-donor's 'radical left-wing influence' Conservative activists formed Jews Against Soros, a grassroots coalition of Jews who oppose the "radical left-wing influence" of George Soros on American politics. foxnews.com

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini

29) This is what they say: "We are Jews who have had enough of George Soros and his malign, leftist influence on American politics. We are Jews who are also sick and tired of the left accusing anyone who criticizes Soros of being antisemitic. Let us be very clear: There is nothing antisemitic about condemning George Soros. There is nothing antisemitic about identifying the many ways that George Soros and his network of organizations fund the radical left. Leftism isn’t Judaism, and being anti-leftist is not the same as being Antisemitic. Period. It’s time for Jews all over America to stand up against George Soros" https://jewsagainstsoros.com/

Home - Jews Against Soros We are Jews who have had enough of George Soros and his malign, leftist influence on politics. We are Jews who are also sick and tired of the left accusing anyone who criticizes Soros of being antisemitic. jewsagainstsoros.com

@KimDotcom — Kim Dotcom

Posted - November 11, 2023 at 8:32 AM

Saved - November 11, 2023 at 9:34 PM

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

Warning! Hard to watch. 100k+ Ukrainian soldiers died in just 4 months of a failed ‘counter offensive’ that the US pushed Ukraine into. Ukraine was ready to make peace with Russia in 2022 but Biden said no. 600k+ died since then. Those deaths are on Biden. https://t.co/QS9P0hpIg3

@_Con_Crescence_ — Silentium

Posted - November 23, 2023 at 3:55 AM

Saved - August 15, 2025 at 8:06 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

The conversation begins with a user criticizing the EU and US foreign policy regarding the war in Ukraine, expressing disdain for Zelensky and suggesting that the conflict has led to unnecessary suffering. They argue that the US's involvement is driven by corruption and economic interests, comparing Ukraine's situation to Iraq. Another user expresses support for Ukraine, prompting the critic to clarify their stance against the current Ukrainian government and question the other user's motivations. The exchange concludes with a suggestion that the responder may be a bot.

@_Con_Crescence_ - Silentium

Another deluded person with deluded take on something that is so obviously a tragedy and abject failure of the EU and US foreign policy. Fortunately this war will be over soon with the exile, death or imprisonment of the horrible leech Zelensky. Thank god this is coming to an end, I only wish so many duped Ukrainian's and Russians didn't have to die for America to satisfy its bloodlust and attempts to stim their economy and look at the US now... how much did their little war porn boost US economy not enough I guess because the US is teetering on the edge of defaulting. It won't of course due to the rampant corruption, but thats probably why along with a feeble attempt to 'weaken' Russia the US supported Ukraine. It takes one corrupt regime pretending to hold democratic values to know another doing the same. Ukraine is so fucked now, and holds as much moral weight as the US during the invasion of Iraq. The CIA backed coup in Ukraine is now well known, Russia did not attack Ukraine in an entirely unprovoked manner, and if you compare Ukraine to pre Maiden, its a hell of a lot worse now. American politicians I salute you and wish for you to get swift karmic justice America's poor excuse for leaders deserve. US' neocon boomer politicians should rot in jail for the abject misery they have caused around the world and to its own citizens through the myriad of foreign and domestic failures. Just wish the Ukrainians weren't so fucking stupid to agree to be led by the that wretch of man zombie Zelensky and butcher Biden

@AMutsey88370 - Anastasia Mutsey

@FANATICALFISH Thanks for supporting Ukraine and for your prayers 🙏

@_Con_Crescence_ - Silentium

@AMutsey88370 You're a bot. Read what I wrote. I do not support containing this war. Zelensky needs to go so unless you are an actual soldier willing to remove Zelensky, I am not sure why you think I am supporting the current Ukrainian government

@AMutsey88370 - Anastasia Mutsey

@FANATICALFISH I understand

@_Con_Crescence_ - Silentium

@AMutsey88370 Than you're a NAFO bot?

@RnaudBertrand — Arnaud Bertrand

Posted - November 25, 2023 at 5:42 AM

Saved - November 26, 2023 at 6:36 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

The Ukrainian parliamentary leader confirms that Russia's main goal was to make Ukraine a neutral country, not invade it entirely. Ukraine couldn't agree due to constitutional constraints and lack of trust in Russia. Western officials were skeptical of the proposed security guarantees. Boris Johnson's refusal to sign anything led to the collapse of the deal. The West's responsibility in triggering the conflict and its failure to secure favorable conditions in a peace deal are evident. There seems to be no accountability or willingness to learn from these catastrophic failures.

@RnaudBertrand - Arnaud Bertrand

This is an incredibly damning piece of historical evidence: This is Davyd Arakhamia, parliamentary leader of Zelensky's ''Servant of the People'' party. He led the Ukrainian delegation at peace talks with the Russians in Belarus and Türkiye in 2022, a few weeks into the war. Here’s what he says: - He confirms that Russia’s principal goal for the war wasn’t to invade the whole of Ukraine but to force Ukraine to become a neutral country that would not be part of NATO: “[Russia] really hoped almost to the last moment that they would force us to sign such an agreement so that we would take neutrality. It was the most important thing for them. They were prepared to end the war if we agreed to, – as Finland once did, – neutrality, and committed that we would not join NATO. In fact, this was the key point. Everything else was simply rhetoric and political ‘seasoning’ about denazification, the Russian-speaking population and blah-blah-blah." - When asked why Ukraine did not agree to this, here’s what he says: “First, in order to agree to this point, it is necessary to change the Constitution. Our path to NATO is written in the Constitution. Secondly, there was no confidence in the Russians that they would do it. This could only be done if there were security guarantees. We could not sign something, step away, everyone would relax there, and then they would [invade] even more prepared – because they had, in fact, gone in unprepared for such a resistance. Therefore, we could only explore this route when there is absolute certainty that this will not happen again. There is no such certainty. Moreover, when we returned from Istanbul, Boris Johnson came to Kyiv and said that we would not sign anything with them at all, and let's just fight.” He’s actually not being very forthright about the “no confidence in the Russians so this could only be done if there were security guarantees” claim, because from the media reports at the time in early 2022, this aspect of the deal was getting concretized. It’s even still up on Ukraine’s official presidency website: https://www.president.gov.ua/en/news/na-peregovorah-iz-rosiyeyu-ukrayinska-delegaciya-oficijno-pr-73933 The concept was that permanent members of the UN Security Council would be the guarantors of the deal, alongside Turkey, Germany, Canada, Italy, Poland and Israel. The issue seems to have been that those security guarantees were “greeted with skepticism” by “Western officials”, as highlighted in this WSJ piece from back then: https://www.wsj.com/articles/ukraine-proposal-for-nato-style-security-guarantee-greeted-with-skepticism-11648683375 So this, combined with Arakhamia’s confirmation that what really killed the deal was “Boris Johnson [coming] to Kyiv and [saying] that we would not sign anything with them at all, and let's just fight” shows that it is unequivocally the West that killed the peace deal. Which confirms the extremely damning responsibility of the West in this war because we’re at a stage, 20 months later, when not only has Ukraine lost a horrifying amount of men (likely hundreds of thousands of deaths) but they couldn’t dream of getting such favorable conditions in a peace deal that the West is NOW pressuring them to make. And I won’t even get into the responsibility of the West in triggering this conflict in the first place with the expansion of NATO and the transformation of Ukraine into a Western bulwark on Russia’s border… Will there be any reckoning? Any admission of this responsibility? Any accountability? Any change, any rethinking in order to avoid such catastrophic failures in the future? Sadly I don’t even see the first inkling of the beginning of this, especially in Europe. And this is what makes me most depressed: it shows we're institutionally set in our erroneous ways with no capability to learn, adapt and change.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Putin claimed to have a document outlining a peace agreement with Ukraine, which he showed during negotiations in Istanbul. The agreement was called the Permanent Agreement on Ukraine and Security Guarantees, consisting of 18 articles covering everything from military equipment to personnel. However, Putin did not make the document public. The Ukrainian delegation aimed to prolong the process, while the Russian delegation wanted to pressure Ukraine into signing the agreement, particularly by ensuring Ukraine's non-membership in NATO. Ukraine refused this point due to the need for constitutional changes and lack of trust in Russia's commitment. The lack of preparation and uncertainty led Ukraine to only work towards an agreement with 100% assurance that history would not repeat itself. Boris Johnson's visit to Kyiv further complicated matters, as he stated that no agreements would be signed, suggesting a preference for continued conflict.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Дивіться, Путін же показував документ та за результатом білоруських перемовин а делегації він це де. Де як він стверджує прописаний проєкт мирно угоди з Україною, і на цей документи начебто було пар у Стамбулі. Називався цей документ угоди про постійний не України і гарантії безпеки. Путін казав, що там було 18 статей, і як він сказав, я з за цитую все прописано від бойової техніки до особового складу Збройних сил Зсу. Я, стоїть підпис керівника делегації. Так, Путін стверджував. Speaker 1: Він не оприлюднив. Увагу. Як ви думаєте, чому, якщо в нього був документ, він був оприлюднив вже. Speaker 0: Мета української делегації була затягувати процес. Мета російської делегації, яка була. Speaker 1: Тарас делегації була на мій погляд, показати вони дійсно дійсно до останнього, що вони нас доти тиснуть. На підписання такої угоди. Щоб ми зняли не, це було найбільше для них справа, щоб він вони готові були закінчити війну. Якщо ми Не дамо зобов'язання, що ми не будемо вступати до Нато. Speaker 0: Тільки. Speaker 1: Фактично ключовий був цей. Це інші політичні, типу де російською нас і. Speaker 0: Чому Україна не погодилися на цей пункт? Speaker 1: По-перше для того, щоб на цей пункт погодити треба змінювати конституцію. На шлях нато в Конституції. По-друге, немає довіри не було і немає росіян, що вони це зроблять. Це можна було тільки зробити, якщо є гарантії безпеки. Ми ж не могли щось підписати, відійти, всі, а потім вони більш. Вони було не зайшли насправді не підготовлені, до такого проти. Тому ми могли тільки працювати, коли є 100. Впевнені, що це не повторюється вдруге. А такої впевненості немає. Більш того, коли ми повернули там було, приїхав Борис Джонсон до Києва і сказав, що ми взагалі не будемо з ними нічого підписувати. І давайте будемо просто воювати. Рим ха фільму на на чи гірший гірший на п 2

During the negotiations with Russia, the Ukrainian delegation officially outlined its proposals for a new system of security guarantees for our country — Official website of the President of Ukraine During the talks with Russia in Turkey, the Ukrainian party officially outlined its proposals for a new system of security guarantees for Ukraine. This was announced by Head of the Ukrainian delegation, Head of the Servant of the People faction David Arakhamia. president.gov.ua

Ukraine Proposal for NATO-Style Security Guarantee Greeted With Skepticism In bid to end war with Russia, negotiators for Kyiv offering neutrality for a defense pledge from western countries wsj.com

@ThomasHenoekl — Thomas Henökl

Posted - November 29, 2023 at 8:45 PM

Saved - December 2, 2023 at 10:38 PM

@ThomasHenoekl - Thomas Henökl

It is now quite clear that #NATO #US and #UK pushed #Ukraine into #UkraineWar. #EU is accomplice enabling this disaster.

@mazzenilsson - Mats Nilsson

There is a growing body of compelling evidence showing that Russia and Ukraine were involved in serious negotiations to end the war in Ukraine right after it started on 24 February 2022. These talks were facilitated by Turkish President Recep Erdogan and former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett and featured detailed and candid discussions on the terms of a possible settlement. By all accounts, these negotiations, which took place in March-April 2022, were making real progress when Britain and the US told Ukrainian President Zelensky to abandon them, which he did. https://open.substack.com/pub/mearsheimer/p/the-myth-that-putin-was-bent-on-conquering?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

The Myth that Putin Was Bent on Conquering Ukraine and Creating a Greater Russia There is a growing body of compelling evidence showing that Russia and Ukraine were involved in serious negotiations to end the war in Ukraine right after it started on 24 February 2022 (see below). These talks were facilitated by Turkish President Recep Erdogan and former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett and featured detailed and candid discussions on the terms of a possible settlement. mearsheimer.substack.com

@TCNetwork — Tucker Carlson Network

Posted - February 8, 2024 at 11:58 PM

Saved - February 9, 2024 at 8:50 PM

@TCNetwork - Tucker Carlson Network

Putin reveals which world leader crushed the Ukrainian peace treaty. https://t.co/PViTL3kFU1

Video Transcript AI Summary

As of February 2024, Speaker 0 asks if the person in question has the freedom to directly communicate with the speaker or their government to resolve the ongoing issues. Speaker 1 responds that the person considers themselves the head of state and won the elections. They believe that the coup d'etat in 2014 is the main source of power. Despite flaws in the government, the person is recognized as the president by the United States, Europe, and most of the world. Speaker 1 mentions negotiations with Ukraine in Istanbul, where the person was aware and even signed a preliminary document. However, they claim that former British Prime Minister Johnson dissuaded them from signing, leading to a sense of ridicule and sadness.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: But do you think at this point, as of February 2024, he has the latitude, the freedom to speak with you or your government directly about putting an end to this, which clearly isn't helping his country or the world. Can he do that, do you think? Speaker 1: Why not? He considers himself head of state. Family. He won the elections. Although we believe in Russia that the coup d'etat is the primary source of power for everything that happened after 2014. And in this sense, even today, government is flawed. But he considers himself the president, and he is recognized by the United States, all of Europe and practically the rest of the world in such a capacity. Why not? Again, we negotiated with Ukraine and Istanbul. We agreed. He was aware of this. He even put his preliminary signature on the document I am telling you about. Speaker 0: His But Speaker 1: then he publicly stated to the whole world, we were ready to sign this document, but mister Johnson, his Then the prime minister of British Britain came and dissuaded us from doing this, saying it was better to fight Russia. And we agreed with this proposal. And the his fact that they obeyed the demand or persuasion of mister Johnson, the former prime minister of Great Britain, seems ridiculous and very sad to me. Premium.

@CollinRugg — Collin Rugg

Posted - February 10, 2024 at 12:00 AM

Saved - February 10, 2024 at 5:35 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Boris Johnson criticizes Tucker Carlson for being a "traitor" after his interview with Vladimir Putin. Johnson accuses Carlson of being a stooge and a traitor to journalism for not asking tough questions and addressing Putin's actions in Ukraine.

@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg

NEW: Boris Johnson has meltdown after the Tucker Carlson - Vladimir Putin interview, calls Carlson a “traitor.” Johnson is likely fuming due to Putin’s claim that he stopped a peace deal. “When Tucker Carlson went to the Kremlin he had a function well known to history. He was to be the stooge of the tyrant, the dictaphone to the dictator and a traitor to journalism,” he said in the Daily Mail. “In his fawning, guffawing, slack-jawed happiness at having a ‘scoop’, he betrayed his viewers and listeners around the world.” “He didn’t ask tough questions. He didn’t ask Putin why even now he is using the most brutal means of modern warfare to maim and murder innocent Ukrainian civilians.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

People worldwide are discussing the recent interview between Tucker Carlson and Vladimir Putin. It is important not to believe the lies presented, especially the idea that Putin will succeed in Ukraine. In fact, he is destined to fail. You can find more information about this in the Daily Mail.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Around the world, people are watching that ludicrous interview with Vladimir Putin conducted by Tucker Carlson. And we must not fall for this tissue of lies above all for the notion that Putin somehow fated to succeed in Ukraine, on the contrary, is doomed to fail. Read about it in the Daily Mail.

@citizenjournos_ — Citizen Journalists

Posted - February 10, 2024 at 10:19 PM

Saved - February 11, 2024 at 9:21 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Timeline: - On 29/3/22, peace deal terms were agreed upon between Russia and Ukraine in Istanbul. - Russia began withdrawing troops from Kiev, acknowledged by the Pentagon. - NATO's Atlantic Council misrepresented the withdrawal as a defeat for Russia. - Ukrainian sources confirmed the withdrawal. - Russian forces continued to withdraw for several days. - On 1/4/22, Zelensky portrayed the withdrawal as a defeat for Russia. - On 6/4/22, Russia completed its withdrawal from Kiev. - On 9/4/22, Boris Johnson arrived in Kiev, reportedly urging Zelensky to continue the war. - Johnson provided $130m for the war effort. - The evidence suggests Russia left Kiev to build trust, contradicting Zelensky's portrayal. - Former Israeli PM Bennett claimed NATO aimed to confront Putin. - Johnson's visit likely ended further peace talks.

@citizenjournos_ - Citizen Journalists

Complete Timeline of Events That Lead to Boris Johnson Scuttling 🇷🇺🇺🇦Peace Deal: 29/3/22: Davyd Arakhamiia, leader of Zelensky's "Servant of the People" party who lead the talks concluded; 'Kiev was ready to accept neutrality...provided binding security guarantees.' 🧵 https://t.co/cBoXiJ92JM

@citizenjournos_ - Citizen Journalists

On the same day (29/3/22) Russia's Deputy Defence Minister Alexander Fomin said; 'Russia was ready to “fundamentally cut back” military activity near the Ukrainian capital of Kyiv and the northern city of Chernihiv' in a move he said was designed “to increase trust”. https://t.co/VgdPVv2gOu

@citizenjournos_ - Citizen Journalists

It was at this meeting in Istanbul on 29/3/22 that terms had been agreed upon between Russian and Ukraine for a peace deal that was initialled by both sides. The person who initialled on behalf of Kiev was Davyd Arakhamiia, who lead the Ukrainian delegation. https://t.co/NfqguA8OZD

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker mentions that the draft of the agreement on the permanent neutrality and security guarantees of Ukraine was initialed by the head of the negotiation group from Kyiv. They emphasize that the agreement includes 18 articles on guarantees, with additional appendices covering armed forces and other matters. However, after the speaker's side withdrew their troops from Kyiv as promised, the Kyiv authorities discarded the agreement, as they usually do, without giving it any importance. The speaker tries to express this in a polite and intelligent manner. (Translated from Russian)

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Проект этого договора был парафирован руководителем переговорной группы из Киева. Он поставил там свою подпись. Вот он. Он есть. Так и называется Договор о постоянном нейтралитете и гарантиях безопасности Украины. Именно о гарантиях, о которых Вы сказали, уважаемый друг 18 статей. Более того, к нему есть ещё и приложение. Они касаются и в Вооруженных силах, и других вещей. Всё прописано до единиц боевой техники и до личного состава Вооруженных Сил. Вот этот документ. Парафирован киевской делегацией. Но после того как мы, как и обещали, отвели войска от Киева, киевские власти, как обычно делают их хозяева, выбросили это всё на свалку истории, скажем так, аккуратно и постараюсь интеллигентно выражаться.

@citizenjournos_ - Citizen Journalists

Russia began withdrawing its troops from Kiev as per their promise made earlier that day in Instanbul. The beginning of the withdrawal was acknowledged by a skeptical John Kirby, Pentagon Spokesman, who said 'Russia’s movement of troops away from Kyiv appeared to be minimal.' https://t.co/s4mSKH388y

@citizenjournos_ - Citizen Journalists

Following the beginning of the withdrawal of Russian forces from Kiev on the 29/3/22, NATO's Atlantic Council put out a piece that same day selling the move as a "defeat" for Russia, when in fact they would have known it was part of an agreed withdrawal "to increase trust". https://t.co/wHArRez9A0

@citizenjournos_ - Citizen Journalists

At the same time the Times of Israel recorded that Kiev had also acknowledged a withdrawal of Russian forces from Kiev and Chernihiv, as per Alexander Fomin's promise. "Ukraine confirms withdrawals around capital and Chernihiv, as ceasefire talks appear to produce first fruits" https://t.co/DHf8vuLF8H

@citizenjournos_ - Citizen Journalists

The withdrawal of Russian forces continued for several days as recorded by NPR on 31/3/22. https://t.co/FoLMhctZR1

@citizenjournos_ - Citizen Journalists

Following the agreed upon withdrawal of Russian forces from Kiev, Zelensky would, on the 1/4/22, stand in front of a green-screen and sell the withdrawal as a defeat for 🇷🇺 saying the 'occupiers were expelled due to the intensity of hostilities'. https://t.co/1AhnDtAHTj

Video Transcript AI Summary

In the Sumy region, north of Kyiv, the expulsion of the occupiers is ongoing. The intensity of the fighting has decreased, but we must understand that this is part of the Russian military's tactics. They are withdrawing from areas where we are hitting them to focus on other important areas. It is crucial for everyone to remain calm and composed. We all want victory, but there are still battles ahead and a difficult path to achieve what we desire.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: На північ від Києва на Чернігівському напрямку в Сумській області тривають вигнання окупантів. Вони їй самі усвідомлюють, що більше не витягують тієї інтенсивності бойових дій, яку могли забезпечити у першій половині березня. Але повинні усвідомлювати ми і те, що для російських військових це частина їхньої тактики. Все це не просто так. Ми знаємо їхні задуми. Знаємо, що вони планують і що вони роблять. Знаємо, що вони забираються з тих напрямків, де ми їх б'ємо, щоб зосередитися на інших дуже важливих. На тих, де нам може бути дуже складно. Тому дуже важливо для всіх проявляти Стриманість в емоціях, стриманість переживаннях. Ми всі однаково хочемо перемоги, усі однаково. Але попереду Будуть битви. Ще треба пройти дуже складний шлях, щоб ми отримали все те, чого прагнемо.

@citizenjournos_ - Citizen Journalists

On 6/4/22 Russia had completed its withdrawal from Kiev, as recorded by Reuters citing US officials. https://t.co/Rn4kEFOoRW

@citizenjournos_ - Citizen Journalists

Then as the Ukrainian delegation returned from talks with Russia in Turkey, Boris Johnson arrived "unexpectedly" in Kiev on the 9/4/22, according to the leader of Zelensky's party David Arahamiya, demanding that peace talks stop and that war continues. https://t.co/8cwUdBprwi

@citizenjournos_ - Citizen Journalists

David Arahamiya says that Johnson came to Kiev to tell Zelensky not to sign any agreement and "let's just go to war". https://t.co/fkYXnsuwHg

Video Transcript AI Summary

They were ready to end the war if we took a neutral stance like Finland and promised not to join NATO. When we returned to Istanbul, Boris Johnson came to Kyiv and said we wouldn't sign anything with them and let's just fight. But as soon as we called on them to sit down, the next day they would already be sitting, waiting with a delegation.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Вони готові були закінчити війну, якщо ми візьмемо, як Фінляндія колись там, нейтралітет, дамо зобов'язання, що ми не будемо вступати до НАТО. Коли ми повернулись до Стамбулу, приїхав Борис Джонсон до Києва і сказав, що ми взагалі не будемо з ними нічого підписувати, і давайте будемо просто воювати. От як тільки ми закличемо їх сісти, наступного дня вони складу делегацією будуть вже сидіти, чекати.

@citizenjournos_ - Citizen Journalists

The "surprise visit" of Johnson in Kiev on 9/4/22 was again sold as a victory for Kiev and a defeat for Russia as Johnson came bearing a gift of $130m for the war to continue. https://t.co/Fb2nz7O72b

Video Transcript AI Summary

The Ukrainian capital, Kyiv, hosts world leaders, including British Prime Minister Boris Johnson. He arrived in Kyiv without wearing body armor, symbolizing Ukraine's control. The UK pledges over $130 million in military aid, including 800 anti-tank missiles. Johnson assures Ukraine of economic and defensive support. Ukrainian President Zelensky appreciates the UK's leadership on sanctions, considering them their most sincere friend.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The Ukrainian capital, which some predicted would fall to Russian hands weeks ago, now a safe enough venue to host world leaders. Speaker 1: How are you? You know how. How are you? How are you? You're absolute heroes. Speaker 0: A surprise visit from Britain's prime minister Boris Johnson. Speaker 1: I'm traveling on a fantastic Ukrainian railways through to, Kiev from Poland. Speaker 0: Arriving in Kyiv yesterday afternoon, not appearing to wear any body armor. You? The 2 leaders walking through Kyiv city center sending a powerful message. Ukraine is still in control. Britain announcing more than a $130,000,000 in you? Military aid, including 800 anti tank missiles. Speaker 1: We will give you the support that you need, the economic support, but also, of course, the defensive military support. Speaker 0: Zelensky calling the UK our most sincere friend, thanking him for leading on sanction.

@citizenjournos_ - Citizen Journalists

Putin summarised these events at a meeting with African Leaders in St Petersburg on 28/7/23: "But after we, as promised, withdrew our troops away from Kiev, the Kiev authorities, just as their owners usually do, threw it all onto the rubbish heap of history." https://t.co/imz6CwMjHS

@citizenjournos_ - Citizen Journalists

Then former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett said he was set to broker a peace deal but 'PM Johnson was the most adamant about taking aggressive action against Putin' he went on to say that 'NATO decided it was necessary to continue to smash Putin'. https://t.co/CDjO6clFJn

@citizenjournos_ - Citizen Journalists

In conclusion, the evidence is very clear that Russia was not pushed out of Kiev by the Zelensky regime but had left "to increase trust" as peace talks had reached an advanced stage. Zelensky selling the retreat as a defeat for Russia went against this spirit of 'trust building'.

@citizenjournos_ - Citizen Journalists

Then Johnson arrived & put an end to any further talks by telling Zelensky "let's just go to war" and giving him $130m to get on with it. The former Israeli PM said 'NATO decided it was necessary to continue to smash Putin' and Johnson likely delivered that message on 9/4/22.

@citizenjournos_ - Citizen Journalists

**This thread was inspired after I noticed that I had gotten my timeline wrong on Johnson's visit to Kiev in another thread, and it was important for me to get this right and clarify matters. Apologies for the slight error. https://x.com/citizenjournos_/status/1756073933667701107?s=20

@citizenjournos_ - Citizen Journalists

Boris Johnson arrived in Kiev days after making a surprise visit to Davos. It was so surprising that he was chased after by corporate stenographers asking him why he was there instead of Sunak. He was most likely there receiving his orders to deliver to Zelensky - No Peace Deal! https://t.co/DtwcTea4g9

Video Transcript AI Summary

Sky News interviews Mr. Johnson at Davos and asks about his future in the ministry. They inquire why he is at Davos and if it is important to be there. Mr. Johnson briefly mentions his earlier statement. They also discuss the significance of forums like Davos for global awareness of Ukraine. Mr. Johnson agrees that they do matter.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Sky News here. How are you now? Tell tell us what what's your future in the ministry? Hello? Mister Johnson. Mister Johnson, why are you here in Davos? Speaker 1: You would have you just you would have just Speaker 0: And, mister Johnson, should should should Rishi Sunet really be here? Hello. Hello. Heard Can you mister Johnson, can you just tell us why why you're here in Davos and why it's important to be here in Davos? Speaker 1: Just just just just take in what I said earlier on. Speaker 0: Heard And but do these do these forums matter though in terms of kind of global awareness for Ukraine? Yes. Heard Speaker 1: Yes.

@BGatesIsaPyscho — Concerned Citizen

Posted - May 13, 2024 at 3:37 PM

Saved - May 13, 2024 at 11:12 PM

@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen

🚨🌎 Britain must prepare for war with Russia Why? Well it’s because Russia killed thousands of Ethnic Ukrainians, Russia ignored the Minsk Accords, Russia has Nazi battalions, numerous bio-laboratories & child trafficking operations across its country. Oh wait, no, that’s Ukraine.

@KimDotcom — Kim Dotcom

Posted - May 24, 2024 at 7:50 AM

Saved - May 24, 2024 at 4:27 PM

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

450,000 British died during WW2 to defeat Nazi Germany. This week Boris Johnson welcomed the Ukrainian neo-Nazi Azov Battalion as “heroes” in London. No respect for those who died to stop the Nazi ideology. Now the UK Govt is using Nazis to kill Russians. https://t.co/4tMq7N8npr

Video Transcript AI Summary

Give Ukrainians the weapons and authorization they need. We rely on heroes like those from the Azov battalion.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The Ukrainians what they need. Give them the weapons. Give them the authorization Ukrainian heroes. We rely heavily on heroes such as the people who are here tonight with us from the Azov

@SMO_VZ — DAVID Z

Posted - May 24, 2024 at 2:12 PM

Saved - May 25, 2024 at 9:04 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

The posts discuss the events in Bucha, Ukraine, where Ukrainian security forces allegedly committed war crimes against Russian prisoners and pro-Russian civilians. The posts highlight the manipulation of information by the "collective West" to create a narrative portraying Ukraine as the defenders of democracy and Russia as aggressors. French journalist Adrien Bocquet, who witnessed the crimes, faced assassination attempts after revealing the truth. The authenticity of the Bucha massacre is questioned, with claims of staged footage and conflicting reports. The Russian Defense Ministry denies the accusations and emphasizes the withdrawal of Russian forces from Bucha. Tim Kirby is acknowledged for providing relevant information on the massacre.

@SMO_VZ - DAVID Z

THE TRUTH on BUCHA: 1 Two years ago, neo-Nazi thugs of the Safari Unit led a rampage through the Kiev suburb of Bucha, “cleansing” it of pro-Russian citizens labeled by the Ukrainian authorities as collaborators. The British government helped manufacture the lie that these crimes were carried out by Russia. The purpose of this lie was to create an excuse for Ukraine to walk away from the recently negotiated Istanbul communique, which would have brought an end to the conflict. Instead, Ukraine fought on for two more years, leading to the present situation, where Ukraine is perched on the abyss of its collective demise. Every Ukrainian and Russian should forever condemn the British government, which has the blood of hundreds of thousands of Slavs on its hands.

@SMO_VZ - DAVID Z

The Ukrainian narrative constructed by the west is built on a bodyguard of lies. And there is no lie greater than that which blames Russia for the deaths of hundreds of Ukrainian civilians in Bucha who were slaughtered by Ukrainian security forces. Sometime during the period between 1-3 April 2022, Ukrainian security forces entered the northern Kiev suburb of Bucha. Russian forces who had occupied the town had evacuated on March 30, part of a general realignment of forces announced by the Russian Ministry of Defense on March 25. Bucha had been on the frontlines and was the scene of heavy fighting between the Russians and Ukrainians; hundreds of civilians caught up in this fighting were killed and wounded. Russian troops were civil to the Ukrainian civilians who remained in Bucha, handing out humanitarian supplies to those in need and bartering dry goods with local vendors for fresh eggs and dairy products. When the Russians withdrew, pro-Russian civilians were encouraged to depart with them. This underscored the Russian understanding of the potential for Ukrainian reprisals against any civilian deemed to have been “cooperating/collaborating” with their forces during the period in which Russian troops occupied Bucha. Many Ukrainians who had interacted with the Russian troops did not leave, assuming that their normal interactions with Russian soldiers, including limited commerce and the acceptance of humanitarian supplies in order to survive, did not constitute treason against the Ukrainian state. They were wrong. Scott Ritter will discuss this article and answer audience questions live on tonight’s episode (Oct. 21). Shortly after Russian troops departed Bucha, Ukrainian security forces made their way into the town. Announcements were made on social media and public broadcasting warning the citizens of Bucha about “cleansing” operations targeting collaborators. In light of these announcements, many of the Ukrainians who had remained in Bucha became concerned about their fate, and began to flee toward Russian lines. They wore the white arm band, indicating that they were not a threat to the Russian troops. Many also brought with them Russian-provided rations to sustain them on their journey. But it was too late. Ukrainian security forces, in particular the “Safari” unit staffed by veterans of the neo-Nazi Azov Regiment, caught up with scores of these refugees while they made their way north and, in the vernacular of the Ukrainians, “cleansed” them, gunning them down on the spot, or binding their hands behind their backs before executing them in the alleyways and streets of Bucha. The evidence of this crime was overwhelming. But the “collective West,” led by a coterie of erstwhile journalists whose function had transformed from reporters of fact-based truth to stenographers of fictional propaganda, was engaged in a larger information operation, designed to shift public opinion away from the need to seek a negotiated settlement to the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, toward the sustainment of a long-term war of attrition designed to weaken Russia in the long term. To accomplish this task, the “collective West” needed to construct an unambiguous “good versus evil” narrative which portrayed the Ukrainians as the brave defenders of democratic values such as freedom and liberty, and the Russians as rapacious thugs marauding across the Ukrainian landscape, brutalizing an innocent civilian population. This kind of unambiguous differentiation of roles was necessary in order to gain popular support for what was to come—a multi-billion-dollar infusion of financial and military aid designed to transform the Russian-Ukraine conflict into a de facto existential struggle between “good” (NATO) and “evil” (Russia). It worked.

@SMO_VZ - DAVID Z

❗️🇷🇺🇺🇦 It happened in Bucha Part 1 "It was in Bucha, there were Russian prisoners of war, some of them were shot in the knees and a few were shot in the head." Adrien Bocquet, a war correspondent from France, spent three weeks in Ukraine as a medical volunteer. He saw the Ukrainian military kill Russian prisoners, lay corpses brought from other cities in the streets of Bucha and provide security for foreign volunteers in exchange for morphine. The revelations of the Frenchman, who had unwittingly witnessed the crimes of Ukrainian militants, had a bombshell effect in Europe. Adrien has survived several assassination attempts, but he continues to tell the truth about Ukraine's crimes. How does the Ukrainian psy-op center create fakes for the West? Who is helping Ukraine in its crimes against civilians? Why doesn't the world hear the people of Donbass? Adrien Bocquet talks about all this and tells us a terrifying truth about himself.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Они приехали на Донбасс по зову сердца, видя страдания и говоря правду о происходящем. Адриан Боке, бывший военный, рассказывает французам о реальности на фронте и помогает местным подросткам с минами. Он подружился с ними, помогая разминировать опасные участки, и пережил обстрел, как один из них.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Они приехали на Донбасс по зову сердца. Speaker 1: Все умничка Speaker 0: они не смогли остаться равнодушными к чужой беде Speaker 1: девочку сидят и раскрашивают делать ей краской кровь И она идет и рассказывает, что это все Путин, это все Россия. Speaker 0: Они увидели то, что невозможно забыть. Speaker 1: Это было в Буче, это были российские военнопленные. Часть из них прострелили колени, а несколько человек были убиты выстрелами в голову. Speaker 0: -Почему они выбрали нашу страну? Чем стала для них Россия? Speaker 1: -Франция отказалась меня защищать, а Россия взяла на себя обязательства по моей защите. Speaker 0: И для чего, вопреки западной пропаганде, они решились говорить правду? Speaker 1: Вопреки злу и угрозам французского правительства, которое продолжает агрессию против Донбасса, я решил продолжать эту борьбу и говорить правду о том, что происходит на Донбассе. Теперь термо ушу. Настолько жарко, 35-40 градусов, я сильно потею, у меня аж капли падают на глаза щиплет и вижу не четко из-за пота неприятно это так называемое место соприкосновения с противником Я думаю о дочке и жене, они скорее всего сейчас на пляже или в бассейне, едят Speaker 0: мороженое, Speaker 1: а я на огневом рубеже, на линии фронта. Speaker 0: Адриан Боке военный корреспондент из Франции. Он приехал на Донбасс летом 2022 года и с тех пор рассказывает своим соотечественникам правду о том, что происходит на Донбассе. Speaker 1: Огонь, огонь, уходим. Я вывел двух человек, женщин. Продолжаем. Возьмем вот это. Не знаю, есть ли тут погибшие. Проблем достаточно. Давай, давай. Я рисую у Цюй. Наверху пожар, там горит, квартира горит. Мы людей вывели огонь там еще горит, крыша разрушена, вот там еще горит! Speaker 0: Адриан Боке в прошлом бывший военнослужащий французской армии. Speaker 1: Когда мне исполнилось 18 лет, я решил поступить во французскую армию. Почему в армию? Потому что я был очень спортивным, у меня есть одна страсть это огнестрельное оружие. Я очень люблю стрелять. И также я люблю путешествовать. Поэтому армия прекрасно мне подходила. Я был военным спецназом. Speaker 0: В Донецке Адриан подружился с местными подростками которые с удовольствием оказывали помощь иностранцу. Speaker 1: С нами ребята, которые нашли противопехотную мину Лепесток. Их сбросили вместе с бомбами, которые разрываются на высоте 100 метров и распространяют эти мины. Противопехотные мины строго запрещены. Они выглядят как зеленый лепесток. Зеленые как листья. Это для того, чтобы их не заметили. Например, человек вышел в сад и взорвался. Вон там зеленое, такого же цвета, как и все остальное. Вот так дети, такие же как эти ребята, погибают или теряют конечности каждый день. Я облял с козами, внезапно заметил, что у меня в уединоке лежит лепестков. Я попросил к знакомым военным, чтобы они помогли их разминировать. Speaker 0: Но с одним из ребят случилась трагедия он попал под обстрел и чудом выжил. Speaker 1: Да? Я очень доволен, что ты в отличной форме несмотря на месяц проведенный в больнице ты тренировался в больнице? Ну ты блещёт? С твоей раной всё нормально?

@SMO_VZ - DAVID Z

❗️❗️❗️ “It was in Bucha, these were Russian prisoners of war, some of them were shot in the knees, and several people were shot in the head.” 🇷🇺 Premiere of a documentary about Adrian Bock, a war correspondent from France, who spent three weeks in Ukraine as a medical volunteer. 🇫🇷 Premier of documentary film about Adrian Boke, French war correspondent, who spent three weeks in Ukraine as a medic volunteer. He saw how the Ukrainian military killed Russian prisoners, how they laid out corpses brought from other cities along the streets of Bucha, how they ensured the safety of foreign volunteers in exchange for morphine. The revelations of the Frenchman, who became an unwitting witness to the crimes of Ukrainian militants, had the effect of a bomb exploding in Europe. Several attempts were made on Adrian's life, but he survived and continues to tell the truth about the crimes of Ukraine. How does TsIPSO create fakes for the West? Who directly helps Ukraine? Why doesn't the world hear the people of Donbass? And what a terrible truth about himself Adrian Boke decided to tell us!

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker describes being kidnapped and taken to a strange place in a minibus. They witnessed people being mistreated and forced to walk in their own waste. They blame Ukraine for the situation and deny any involvement from Russia. Another speaker recounts how Ukrainian tanks fired at a theater where children and civilians were present. The speaker also mentions seeing Ukrainian troops with neo-Nazi tattoos. The video shows the aftermath of attacks on hospitals and the speaker's personal experience of being injured and paralyzed. They express their determination to continue fighting against the lies spread by Ukraine and the West. The speaker now collaborates with a French journalist to gather evidence of Ukraine's crimes. They express their love for Russia and consider it their homeland.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Ну и мне, соответственно, удар в живот, кулек на голову и оказался я в каком-то микроавтобусе ночью и минут меня куда-то везли, я не знал направление, куда, что, куда, что и что. Ничего не понимал, что вообще произошло. Там тоже мне нелегко было били понижали и пытали пальцы на ногах и плывут в слезу. Вот это наш азот такой странный. Люди как в консерве и в Англии запрессованы стоя от такой девочки до мальчика и бабушки таких возрастных людей и вы представьте я не знаю сколько они там находились самое интересное что этот кабинет открыл, жар вот этот с кабинета, да? И вонь люди под себя ходили в туалет. Кто так делает? Это наши защитники? Вот это я открыл людей и оттуда вместе с ними убирал. Во всем этом виновата Украина, а не Россия. Это 100%. Так Россия не поступает никогда со своими близкими. Speaker 1: Также он был свидетелем того, как украинские танки стреляли по драмтеатру в то время, когда там находились дети и мирное население. Speaker 0: На этом перекрестке стояли украинские войска Азова с двумя орудиями. В этом здании, в драмтеатре, находилось 500 человек людей. Помимо того, люди там находились, добровольно пришедшие, они еще туда загоняли просто, типа как прикрытие. И уже вот под вечер они с этого перекрестка ударили прямым ударом с орудия в суда. Влетело в центр театра. На этом все не закончилось. С другой стороны здания, с противоположной стороны, они двумя орудиями ударили, и завалился полностью купол драмтеатра. И уже людей тогда, когда уже зашли в ДНР. -Вот здание драмтеатра с противоположной стороны, откуда азовцы продолжали обстрел. Безжалостно расстреливали людей. Вот последствия того, что они натворили. И это не Россия, И российских войск я здесь не видел. Вот подвальное помещение под сценой, где были люди. Их просто отсюда выкапывали. Speaker 2: -Адриан и пообщались с военнопленными Азова. Speaker 3: Я адъютант Минников, медбрат медпункта полка Азов. 15 лет опыта, 10 лет в гвардии. Ролит специалист-реаниматолог. Speaker 1: Где вы выучили французский? Моя Speaker 3: мать была доцентом в университете, я учился в нем. Там и освоил. -Да. -Я сдался Вооруженным силам России 18 мая. Speaker 1: -На Азовстали? Speaker 3: -Да, на Азовстали. Speaker 1: -Ясно. Чем вы занимались на Азовстали? Какая должность у вас была на Азов стали? Speaker 3: -То же самое медбрат. -То есть вы лечили людей? -Да, обрабатывал раны, лечил больных и все такое. Повернитесь. Speaker 1: Я сейчас в тюрьме для пленных с боевиками Азова. Как вы видите, татуировки настоящие, они существуют. Неонацистские татуировки. Вот тут четкая нацистская свастика. Вот. Вот тут изображение на ту же тему. Да, вот тут. Тут несколько свастик, они слегка заретушированы, видоизменены, кое-что написано. Тут ещё изображения, особенно на второй руке в шлеме. Это шлем СС, а тут меч. Не Россия нанесла эти татуировки на пленников Азова. Перед вами доказательство того, что пленники Азова реально имеют неонацистские татуировки. Это лишь малая часть, их сотни, с набитыми знаками СС, свастикой на теле. Я сказал сотни, и это сотни и вот вам пример демонстрирующий что это правда -Осторожно! Черт, ты ранен? Ты в порядке? -Ай, окей? Speaker 0: -Подожди, дядь, хопей. Speaker 1: -По этой больнице только что стреляли. Мы только что прибыли. Я был неподалеку. Сейчас трое пострадавших, у них очень серьезные ранения. Посмотрите, полностью искорежено. Вот они везде, все взорвано. Поднимаемся по лестнице. Посмотрите, какие здесь повреждения. Это опять же от реактивного снаряда, от снаряда, опять от снаряда. К сожалению, здесь был очень тяжело ранен человек с кровопотерей. Мы во второй палате, где был взрыв, которая находится рядом. Здесь, кажется, был тяжело ранен человек. В частности, тот, кто был здесь, в него попали из окна. Это град, здесь какие-то чёрточки, а вот здесь загнулись концы. Есть потёртости, есть выбоина, она огромная. Давайте посмотрим, я целиком помещаюсь. Вот, это действительно очень большой взрыв был, взрыв перед входом. Speaker 2: Мы задали Адриану вопрос для чего обычный француз подвергает свою жизнь Speaker 1: опасности? Во время прыжков я упал с высоты 4 метров. Я сломал позвоночник и был парализован в течение двух лет. Я пережил 18 операций на позвоночнике. Я пришел в сознание в реанимации, и в этот момент мне врачи Speaker 4: сказали, что Speaker 1: я должен снова уснуть, чтобы сохранить мозг. Врачи также сказали, что не знают, проснусь ли я после Speaker 0: этого сна. Speaker 1: Врачи Speaker 2: дали Адриану час времени, чтобы позвонить дочери и близким и попрощаться с ними. Speaker 1: Я никому не желаю пережить такое. Это был самый тяжёлый момент в моей жизни. Мне нужно было попрощаться с дочкой, и сказать ей, что, возможно, она больше никогда не увидит своего папу. Я ей сказал, что она сможет разговаривать со мной всегда и днём и ночью, и хоть я не смогу ей отвечать, но всё равно буду всегда рядом. Она сказала, что не понимает, почему я не смогу ей больше отвечать. Это момент, который я больше никогда не хотел бы пережить в своей жизни. Speaker 2: Случилось чудо через две недели Адриан пришёл в сознание, но то что услышал от врачей навсегда разделило жизнь на до и после. Оказалось что у Адриана болезнь Паркинсона, вот уже три года он постоянно на лекарственных препаратах. Speaker 1: Мне сказали, что я проживу еще около десяти лет, поэтому я никогда не узнаю, что такое старость. Я постараюсь прожить как можно дольше ради моей дочери. Это моя главная цель. Speaker 2: С того момента Адриан решил, что его миссия рассказывать людям ту правду, которую он видел своими глазами. В августе 2022 года Адриан стал свидетелем и доказал применение французского вооружения в ходе атаки на гражданское население Донецка. Он открыто выступил на пресс-конференции на эту тему и после этого естественно стал мишенью для ВСУ. Speaker 1: На меня совершается СБУ пытались меня убить. Были три серьезных раны, но мне в очередной раз повезло. Многие журналисты после этого бы остановились, но я решил идти до конца. Самое главное это беспокойство за мою дочь. Ей четыре раза пришлось менять школу, ей угрожали смертью. Единственным выходом было получить российское гражданство и переехать жить в Россию. И самый важный момент Франция отказалась меня защищать, а Россия взяла на себя обязательства по моей Speaker 2: защите. Адриан признается, что несмотря ни на что будет продолжать вести борьбу против лжи, которую распространяет Украина и Запад. Speaker 1: Вопреки злую угрозам французского правительства, которое продолжает агрессию против Донбасса, я решил продолжать эту борьбу и говорить правду о том, что происходит на Донбассе, а также тем, кто хотел меня Speaker 0: убить. Speaker 2: Адриан Боке плотно сотрудничает с Кристель Неан, военным корреспондентом из Франции. Вместе они собирают доказательства преступлений Украины и Запада. Speaker 4: Эта ракета упала на больницу Калинина Зимой это вообще разбило почти половину больницы. Такой это кассетные, такие рожи. У нас есть здесь осколки из снаряда 155 миллиметров, тановский стандарт артиллерии. И здесь у меня есть Speaker 0: кусок Speaker 4: мн17, который эти как это следствии комитет нидерландии не решил забрать и есть много такие обломки ещё на земле Донбасса. Для меня Россия самая душевная страна, душа России большая как сама страна. Это страна, где люди очень искренние, очень эмоциональные. Да, это уже моя родина.

@SMO_VZ - DAVID Z

Istanbul: Assassination attempt on French journalist for reporting on Ukraine! French journalist Adrien_Bocquet was physically attacked and injured by two men in Istanbul. On the eve of the knifeattack, the journalist's current location was published in Ukrainian Telegram groups and calls for murder were made in exchange for money. The two perpetrators tried to cut the former soldier's throat during the attack. In the process, the victim suffered several cuts on his body before fleeing - after a fight with the two attackers. Bocquet had travelled to Turkey to apply for a new visa for the Russian Federation and wants to continue reporting from the Donbass. In the past, Bocquet had reported on Ukrainian war crimes and provocations in Bucha.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Je suis un expert balistique de l'OTAN au Donbass. J'ai révélé une attaque chimique française contre Donetsk. J'ai été arrêté en France pour avoir divulgué des preuves. Je continue mon combat pour la vérité et aide les enfants blessés. Les images montrent des attaques récentes et des preuves d'obus de l'OTAN. Je travaille volontairement, soutenu par des dons russes. Mon objectif est de montrer la vérité et d'aider les victimes. Translation: I am a NATO ballistic expert in Donbass. I exposed a French chemical attack on Donetsk. I was arrested in France for revealing evidence. I continue my fight for truth and help injured children. The images show recent attacks and evidence of NATO shells. I work voluntarily, supported by Russian donations. My goal is to show the truth and help the victims.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Merci beaucoup. Je suis très heureux d'être avec vous ce soir. Le poids est très dur. Il faut comprendre que j'ai tout perdu. J'ai perdu ma famille, mon travail, mon argent, absolument tout. Aujourd'hui, l'armée ukrainienne propose de l'argent pour me tuer. Et je voudrais également vous préciser qu'il propose de doubler cet argent si je suis tué en Russie. Au jour d'aujourd'hui, je suis le seul expert balistique de l'OTAN du Donbass et je travaille avec le SKK pour montrer la vérité. Il y a deux jours nous avons fait une conférence de presse anti terrorisme avec le gouvernement du Donbass. Je peux vous confirmer aujourd'hui que le gouvernement français est impliqué dans une attaque chimique contre la population du Donbass qui s'est passée le onze août deux-mille-vingt-deux. Des réserves d'ammoniac ont été ciblées volontairement et ont créé des fuites et ont contaminé toute l'eau de la ville de Donetsk. Ce n'est plus un crime de guerre, c'est un crime contre l'humanité. Je demande aujourd'hui à Vladimir Poutine de demander au gouvernement français qu'ils s'expliquent et qu'ils reconnaissent qu'une arme française a été utilisée pour une attaque chimique. Pour vous expliquer simplement, une bombe, des morceaux d'une bombe française ont été retrouvés sur les lieux de l'attaque chimique. Sur cette bombe, il y a des inscriptions en français. La preuve est irréfutable. Je demande également à l'ONU d'ouvrir une enquête internationale sur cette attaque chimique dont le gouvernement français est impliqué directement ou indirectement vu que ce sont des armes françaises qui ont été utilisées pour cette attaque chimique. Je voudrais également vous raconter ce qu'il m'est arrivé il y a un mois et demi quand je suis retourné en France pour dévoiler ce qu'il se passe dans le Donbass. J'ai été arrêté par la police française, mis en prison et torturé. J'ai fait un malaise cardiaque en prison, j'ai terminé à l'hôpital grâce à mon avocat mon avocat m'a sorti de prison pour torture en france on m'a tendu un piège un très gros piège et malheureusement au jour d'aujourd'hui si je retourne en France, je risque de rester en prison pendant très longtemps. Tout ça est arrivé, car je suis rentré en France et j'ai voulu divulguer les preuves des bombes françaises, divulguer les militaires Azov néonazis qui ont tué des civils. J'ai récolté toutes ces preuves et j'ai voulu divulguer ces preuves, j'ai été mis en prison avant. Sur les images que vous êtes en train de regarder, ce sont les morceaux de bombes de l'attaque chimique avec les inscriptions françaises, donc les preuves sont irréfutables. C'était pendant la conférence de presse antiterrorisme du Donbass, mercredi. Depuis cette présentation officielle, l'armée ukrainienne diffuse sur télégramme des messages pour que je sois tué le plus rapidement possible. Je resterai et je continuerai mon combat au Donbass le plus longtemps possible. Je fais, je fais ça pour la vérité et également pour la Russie. Je voudrais dire à la population russe qu'ils peuvent compter sur moi et que je continuerai ce travail jusqu'au bout. Je n'ai plus rien à perdre. Je veux que maintenant la Russie puisse montrer à l'occident qu'ils ne sont pas ce que l'occident le prétend. Mon travail ici au donbass ne ne s'arrête pas à l'expert balistique je m'occupe également d'enfants blessés et notamment je diffuse tout cela sur ma chaîne télégramme j'invite tout le monde à me suivre sur mon canal et à m'aider ici au donbass pour montrer la vérité et également aider les enfants blessés du Donbass. Je voudrais donc préciser également que depuis pratiquement deux mois que je suis à Donbass, nous avons réussi avec une association dont votre télé fait partie, nous avons réussi à faire transférer des enfants qui ont été amputés ou démembrés à Moscou pour qu'ils soient correctement soignés les images que vous êtes en train de voir actuellement c'est celle attaque du marché qui a eu lieu cet après midi dans donetsk non cet après midi le morceau que vous venez de voir c'est un morceau d'un obus de 155 américains ou français Voilà, vous avez les images malheureusement du marché qui a été bombardé cet après-midi. Il y a trois personnes qui sont mortes, il me semble cinq blessés. Nous avons expertisé la scène avec le s ckk du donbass et j'ai trouvé un petit morceau le seul pour pouvoir prouver que c'est un obus un obus de l'otan qui vient de tuer trois personnes aujourd'hui je voudrais aussi vous signaler une petite information le travail que je fais humanitaire et en tant qu'expert balistique tout cela je le fais volontairement la russie ne me paye pas je suis payé par personne je fais ce travail gratuitement je vous précise cela car beaucoup de choses ont été dites sur moi que j'ai été payé par le kremlin cela est totalement faux ce que je fais ici est totalement volontaire et personnel et je tiens à préciser que grâce à la générosité de la population russe qui font des dons avec ma chaîne télégramme, cela me permet de continuer mon travail ici. Je tiens bien à préciser la population russe et non pas la population franc européenne pour vous expliquer mes journées que je passe ici tous les jours je vais sur les lieux de bombardements pour expertiser les bombes de l'otan et quand j'ai un petit peu de temps entre les bombardements je vais à l'hôpital et je m'occupe des enfants blessés jour et nuit. Adriana, survivre heure par heure maintenant.

@SMO_VZ - DAVID Z

On March 31, the smiling mayor of Bucha, Anatoly Fedoruk, was filming a video that the Russian military had left the city. On April 1, the video was shown on the Ukraine 24 TV channel. All this time, no one spoke about the streets strewn with corpses. Because there were no corpses. And the footage circulated today with the bodies of the dead appeared after Ukrainian troops entered the city. >> "Who was bombing Bucha?"🤔 sometimes the brainwashing is so strong that no matter how much logic you use to counter it, it won't work >>>> INCONSISTENCIES with the “Bucha massacre” Ms. Katerina Ukraintseva, Bucha City Council Deputy, stated on an April 4 interview that the bodies have been “lying on the city’s main street for a month”. Yet neither the city’s mayor, nor the Ukrainian National police, nor herself immediately reported on the atrocities upon arrival to Bucha (from March 31 till April 2). The Russian troops, however, withdrew from the city on March 30. Source: Russian media official channels in Facebook. On March 30th Russian MoD reported that they left Bucha, major of Bucha confirmed it on March 30th. He didn't mention any executions or any corpses on the streets. Weird, I think it is something he should have mentioned, no? (vid 1) But on April 4th, BOOM, it's all over the Western news First, it was reported that victims were executed. Shot dead. Later it would come out that most died from artillery fire, they were hit by pointed, fin-stabilized steel darts, that came from anti-personnel artillery shells But even after it came out that victims died from the artillery fire, they continue to blame the Russians. By their logic, Russians were shelling their own forces.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Today we celebrate the liberation of our community from Russian occupiers by the Ukrainian Armed Forces. This victory is a joyous one and a great achievement for our forces in Kyiv region. We will continue to work towards victory across all of Ukraine. Glory to the Ukrainian Armed Forces! Glory to Ukraine! Glory to every Ukrainian, no matter where they are in the country.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Дорогі друзі, шановна Бучанська громада! 31 березня в ідеалі історію нашого населеного пункту всієї територіальної громади як день звільнення від російських орків, від російських окупантів нашими Збройними Силами України, наших населених пунктів. Тож сьогодні констатую, що цей день є радісний і велика перемога. Велика перемога наших Збройних Сил на Київщині. І ми обов'язково з вами дочекаємося і будемо все робити для того, щоб велика перемога була по всій Україні. Слава нашим Збройним Силам України! Слава Україні! Слава кожному українцю, незалежно від того, в якому куточку України він зараз знаходиться.

Video Transcript AI Summary

In a Ukrainian village, a column of Russian military vehicles was stopped by Ukrainian security forces. There were damaged Russian vehicles in the area, leading to questions about who was responsible. The damaged vehicles were attributed to Ukrainian artillery, while the bombing of the village was attributed to Russia. The discussion highlights the conflicting narratives surrounding the events in the village.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: В районе села Украины остановили колонну с порога, улицы вокзаль на мсья Буча. Это результаты их вторжения и работы наших СБ. Конечно, приватный сет, который рядом, такое восхождение. Speaker 1: Ты видел кадры, где стоит разбитая российская техника? Да. Видел, да? Теперь вопрос к тебе: если в Буче стоит разбитая российская техника, кто её разбил? Украинцы. Тогда кто бомбил Бучу? Кто бомбил? Российские японцы. Российская техника стояла в Буче разбитая? Ну. Кто её разбил? Украина. Тогда кто стрелял по Буче, в которой находилась российская техника? Россия. Как? Начинаем сначала: В Буче стоит разбитая российская техника. Кто ее разбил? Ну, Украина. Тогда, если российская техника разбитая стоит в Буче Её разбила украинская артиллерия. Кто стрелял по Буче? Кто бомбил по Буче? Speaker 0: Россия.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The mayor of Bucha initially reported the city was free from Russian troops without mentioning any tragedies. A city council deputy later urged residents to stay indoors during a military sweep, still not mentioning any atrocities. Days later, she mentioned bodies in an interview. The Ukrainian National Police released a video of a sweep in Bucha without mentioning bodies. Reports of bodies only surfaced when the Ukrainian military and media arrived, suggesting a coordinated effort to create a dramatic narrative. Translation: The mayor and city council deputy of Bucha did not mention atrocities initially, but later reports of bodies emerged coinciding with the arrival of the Ukrainian military and media.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: You recall Anatoly Fedoruk, the mayor of Bucha reporting on March 31st that the city is free from the Russian troops. Not a single word was said about the tragedy or anybody's whatsoever. Katerina Ukrainseva, Bucha City Council Deputy, reported on April 1st that the city was free from the Russian troops. And here, you can see herself telling the residents of the city to stay indoors and not stand in the way of the military doing a swipe of the city. In both of her messages, still not a single word on the alleged atrocities. A few days later, in an interview, she suddenly starts talking about the bodies. On April 2nd, the Ukrainian National Police published an almost 8 minute video of them conducting a swipe across Bucha. Yet again, this publicly available video mentions not even a single word on the bodies piling up the street. So, mister Kainsawa is telling us there's been bodies lying on the town's main street for a month. Yet neither the city's mayor, nor the national police, nor mister herself immediately report on them. When the reports do actually appear, they're perfectly timed with the arrival of the Ukrainian military, along with the media. All in an attempt to put together one of the biggest performances yet.

@SMO_VZ - DAVID Z

Mayor and Zelesnky sure did look sad and sombre 2 days after the world was told the lie of BUCHA on location !!!!

@SMO_VZ - DAVID Z

⚡⚡The shooting in Bucha was caught on video. Revealed what really happened in the suburbs of Kiev ➡️ Bloggers have found another proof that the "genocide in Bucha" was staged by the Ukrainian forces. In the video, where the epic dialogue takes place, "There are guys without blue armbands, can I shoot at them? - Of course, #@$!", there is another eloquent part. 😞 At the end, you can hear a distant cry of "Please don't kill. I don't want to!". It is followed by two "shuffles", similar to the sounds of gunshots.

@SMO_VZ - DAVID Z

“I take full responsibility for what I say. While in Ukraine, I witnessed war crimes. All of them were committed by the Ukrainian army. But in France we don't talk about it!" - Adrien Boke. Here, the demobilized French soldier, the author of the book "Get up and go thanks to science", went to Ukraine on a humanitarian mission and spent three weeks there. Upon his return, he made a difficult decision that could cost him his life or at least create many problems: he decided to convey to the French information about the crimes he had witnessed in Ukraine. Here are quotes from his interview: When I returned to France from Ukraine, I was shocked: TV channels invite as experts people who have not been to Ukraine and do not know anything about what is happening there now. However, they dare to speculate about these events. Between what I hear from the TV screen and what I saw with my own eyes is an abyss. Azov fighters are everywhere. With neo-Nazi stripes. It shocks me that Europe is supplying weapons to neo-Nazis. On their uniforms, SS symbols are embroidered everywhere. Not only do they not hide their views. They advertise them. I worked with these people and treated them. They openly say that they are ready to destroy blacks and Jews. Being there, there was nothing I could do. Just watch and make videos. I have this footage and will use it as evidence of Ukraine's crimes. I witnessed how the Ukrainian military shot through the knees of captured Russian soldiers and shot in the head higher-ranking officers. I have personally seen American cameramen making fake footage from the scene of the events, staging staging. All destroyed civilian buildings, given out by Ukraine for bombardment of civilians, are nothing more than the result of inaccurate shooting by Ukrainians at military facilities. The Armed Forces of Ukraine hide ammunition in residential buildings at night, without even informing the residents. This is called using people as a shield. Butch is a staging. The bodies of the dead were moved from other places and deliberately placed in such a way as to produce a shocking footage." Full version of the interview https://youtu.be/ZoKnhXnp-Zk

Video Transcript AI Summary

Des militaires russes capturés par des soldats ukrainiens ont été maltraités et interrogés dans un hangar. Chaque soldat qui descendait d'une fourgonnette et ne répondait pas aux questions se faisait tirer dans le genou. Ceux qui prétendaient être officiers étaient abattus. Des vidéos attestent de ces actes violents. Translation: Russian soldiers captured by Ukrainian soldiers were mistreated and interrogated in a hangar. Each soldier who got out of a van and did not answer the questions was shot in the knee. Those who claimed to be officers were shot. Videos confirm these violent acts.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Avez vu, vous dites que vous avez décidé, oui. J'ai vu donc des militaires russes qui ont été capturés et qui ont été donc du coup déjà bien malmenés et qui ont été, on va dire attachés. Et en fait, on était dans une sorte de hangar et ces militaires russes qui ont été capturés arrivaient dans des petites fourgonnettes par trois ou par quatre. Les les les militaires Azov ukrainiens leur demandaient qui est l'officier, qui est l'officier Je vais vous expliquer pourquoi. Où ils répondaient pas Où ils répondaient Chaque militaire qui descendait de cette fourgonnette se prenait une balle de kalachnikov dans le genou. Alors qu'ils étaient sans défense, j'ai des vidéos qu'il attestent, sinon je me permettrais pas de sortir des trucs pareils. J'ai des vidéos où on montre des militaires russes en train de se prendre des balles dans le genou. On ne sait pas trop pourquoi parce qu'ils ne répondent pas à des questions et les gens qui avaient le malheur donc de dire c'est moi le le l'officier se prenait une balle dans la tête voilà comment

@SMO_VZ - DAVID Z

ADRIAN BOCQUET documentary Operation Ukraine: Bandera's Dark Shadow / 2023 ‘After I visited Ukraine in Donbass, I had the opportunity to talk to and question the captured 'Azov' Battalion officers and fighters. These captives told me how they killed civilians and fired machine guns at buses carrying dozens of children’, says French journalist Adrien Bocquet. https://t.me/UKRAINE_HISTORY_TG/465

RUSSIA SMO / HISTORY & DOCUMENTARY/ MOVIES Operation Ukraine: Bandera's Dark Shadow / 2023 ‘After I visited Ukraine in Donbass, I had the opportunity to talk to and question the captured 'Azov' Battalion officers and fighters. These captives told me how they killed civilians and fired machine guns at buses carrying dozens of children’, says French journalist Adrien Bocquet. Good night everyone! t.me

@SMO_VZ - DAVID Z

Fake: The Russian military withdrew from Bucha, having previously left civilian casualties. Reality: Stories about Bucha appeared in several foreign media outlets at once, which looks like a planned media campaign. Taking into account that the troops left the city on March 30, where was the footage for four days? Their absence only confirms the fake. The video of the bodies is confusing: here at the 12th second the "corpse" on the right is moving his arm. At 30th second in the rear view mirror the "corpse" sits down. The bodies in the video seem to have been deliberately laid out to create a more dramatic picture. This is easily seen if you play the video at 0.25 of normal speed. After Russian troops withdrew from Bucha, the AFU shelled the city. This may have also caused civilian casualties. Mikhail Podolyak uses such staged footage as a pretext to request weapons from Western countries. #MoD #Russia #Ukraine #FakeNews

@SMO_VZ - DAVID Z

⚡️ Statement by the Russian Defence Ministry ⚡️ APRIL.2022 The Russian Defence Ministry denies accusations of Kiev regime of allegedly killing civilians in Bucha, Kiev Region Facts 👇 ❗️All the photos and videos published by the Kiev regime allegedly testifying to some "crimes" committed by Russian servicemen in Bucha, Kiev region are just another provocation. During the time that the town has been under the control of the Russian armed forces, not a single local resident has suffered from any violent action. Russian servicemen have delivered and distributed 452 tonnes of humanitarian aid to civilians in Kiev Region. For as long as the town was under the control of the Russian armed forces and even then, up to now, locals in Bucha were moving freely around the town and using cellular phones. The exits from Bucha were not blocked. All local residents were free to leave the town in northern direction, including to the Republic of Belarus. At the same time, the southern outskirts of the city, including residential areas, were shelled round the clock by Ukrainian troops with large-calibre artillery, tanks and multiple launch rocket systems. ❗️We would like to emphasise that all Russian units withdrew completely from Bucha as early as March 30, the day after the Russia-Ukraine face-to-face round of talks in Turkey. Moreover, on March 31, the mayor of Bucha, Anatoliy Fedoruk, confirmed in a video message that there were no Russian servicemen in the town, but he did not even mention any locals shot in the streets with their hands tied. 👉 It is not surprising, therefore, that all the so-called "evidence of crimes" in Bucha did not emerge until the fourth day, when the Security Service of Ukraine and representatives of Ukrainian media arrived in the town. It is of particular worry that all the bodies of the people whose images have been published by the Kiev regime are not stiffened after at least four days, have no typical cadaver stains, and the wounds contain unconsumed blood. ❗️All this confirms conclusively that the photos and video footage from Bucha are another hoax, a staged production and provocation by the Kiev regime for the Western media, as was the case in Mariupol with the maternity hospital, as well as in other cities. 🔗 https://t.me/mod_russia_en/656⚡️🇷🇺

MoD Russia ⚡️🇷🇺Russian Defence Ministry denies accusations of Kiev regime of allegedly killing civilians in Bucha, Kiev Region ❗️All the photos and videos published by the Kiev regime allegedly testifying to some "crimes" committed by Russian servicemen in Bucha, Kiev region are just another provocation. ▫️During the time that the town has been under the control of the Russian armed forces, not a single local resident has suffered from any violent action. Russian servicemen have delivered and distributed 452 tonnes of humanitarian aid to civilians in Kiev Region. ▫️For as long as the town was under the control of the Russian armed forces and even then, up to now, locals in Bucha were moving freely around the town and using cellular phones. ❗️The exits from Bucha were not blocked. All local residents were free to leave the town in northern direction, including to the Republic of Belarus. At the same time, the southern outskirts of the city, including residential areas, were shelled round the clock by Ukrainian troops… t.me

@SMO_VZ - DAVID Z

TIM KIRBY did also a great summary on the BUCHA NAZI MASSACRE I would personally like to thank @NewReistance for posting so much relevant information about this horrible event. https://rumble.com/v106fun-russian-bucha-massacre-timeline-of-putins-crimes.html

Russian Bucha Massacre Timeline of Putin's Crimes =====DISCLAIMER===== All of the videos in the series "Tim Kirby Russia" are rights free and you may use them as you like in your own videos (even if your view's on Tim's opinions are highly negative) rumble.com

@ivan_8848 — Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Posted - July 26, 2024 at 8:59 AM

Saved - November 11, 2024 at 2:12 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I’ve been reflecting on the Ukraine war and its roots, emphasizing that it was never just about NATO. Many argue that U.S. actions, including the overthrow of Yanukovych and NATO's eastward expansion, provoked Russia. Jeffrey Sachs and others highlight that the war could have been avoided with proper negotiations and respect for agreements like Minsk II. There’s a consensus that the conflict serves the interests of global elites, and NATO's existence perpetuates war. The narrative of an unprovoked invasion is misleading; the complexities of history reveal a different story.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

"Not About Nato" "Never About NATO" "Nothing to Do With NATO" NATO training, NATO weapons, NATO mercenaries, NATO specialists, NATO intelligence, NATO money. UKRAINE WAR

Video Transcript AI Summary

President Putin sent a draft treaty demanding NATO not to expand, which was a precondition for avoiding war in Ukraine. NATO expansion is not the core issue; the conflict is about Ukraine's democratic integrity and Putin's desire to rebuild a Soviet-like empire. Ukraine is facing restrictions on political parties, religious organizations, and free expression, which highlights the struggle for democracy. The invasion stems from Putin's ambitions rather than NATO's actions. Comparisons are drawn between Putin and historical figures like Hitler, emphasizing the threat he poses not only to Ukraine but globally. The conversation underscores the need to recognize the true motivations behind the conflict, which are rooted in power and influence rather than NATO's presence.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: President Putin actually sent a draft treaty that he wanted NATO to sign to promise no more NATO enlargement. That was what what he sent us. And that was that that was a precondition for not invade Ukraine. Of course, we didn't sign that. So he went to war to prevent NATO, more NATO across his borders. Speaker 1: Flashback. Speaker 0: This is fundamentally not about NATO expansion. Speaker 2: It was Speaker 1: never about NATO enlargement. It's not about NATO. It's not about NATO expanding toward Russia. This was never about NATO. It's absolutely nothing to do with NATO expansionism. And it has nothing to do with NATO. Speaker 2: This is not about NATO. Not about NATO. Speaker 1: It's not really about NATO. This is not about NATO. Seriously, it's not about Speaker 3: NATO. Speaker 2: This was never about NATO. Speaker 1: It was never about NATO. Let's be honest. Speaker 2: This doesn't have anything to do with NATO? Speaker 1: Nothing to do with NATO at all. Speaker 2: Yeah. He's claiming it's, like, security purposes, but we Speaker 1: can see the clear reason. Speaker 3: But NATO is not the reason. Speaker 1: This is Speaker 2: not about NATO expansion. This is about the democratic expansion. Ukraine bans religious organizations. We are protecting democracy right now. Ukraine is banning political parties. Speaker 1: Because it's a democracy. Ukraine restricts Speaker 2: books and music. It's about democracy. Ukraine won't hold elections. It's about democracy. And it's not about NATO expansion. Speaker 1: This war in Ukraine is not about NATO. It's not about NATO. It's not about NATO. It has Speaker 3: nothing to do with NATO. Speaker 2: Nothing to do with NATO expansion. Speaker 3: It's not about NATO expansion. Speaker 2: Nothing to do with with NATO. It isn't really about NATO. Speaker 1: It's not about NATO. It's not about NATO enlargement. In fact, it has nothing to do with NATO. Speaker 2: It's not about NATO encroaching. Speaker 3: It's not about NATO. NATO is just as a fictious imaginary adversary for for for mister Putin and for Russia. Speaker 2: It was never about NATO. Speaker 1: That's not what it's been about. It's been about him trying to expand his sphere of influence. Speaker 3: Hang on. I mean, the 2 are not mutually exclusive. Obviously, Russia has wished for a sphere of influence over Ukraine. But if the west had not challenged Russian interests so directly, I think that there there was a a chance to avoid this war. Speaker 0: He wanted us to sign the promise never to enlarge NATO. We rejected that. Speaker 1: The reason why Putin invaded Ukraine is because of his evil Speaker 2: Evil. Speaker 0: It's about that Putin wants to rebuild Soviet empire of evil like president Reagan told. Speaker 2: It's about Putin being sick. I don't Speaker 1: know how you negotiate peace with a madman, but Nobody negotiated with Hitler. People are comparing him to Hitler. To Hitler. Remember Hitler. Speaker 2: He's a Hitler. Speaker 1: We're back when the Nazis invaded Poland. Speaker 2: This is exactly the same what Hitler was doing to choose. Speaker 1: This is the same. Putin will not stop. Speaker 2: Putin is reminiscent of Hitler. Hitler. This reminds me of Hitler. Hitler. Hitler. Speaker 3: He's the new Hitler. Speaker 2: Well, Hitler Speaker 1: This is about a butcher trying to kill people everywhere in the world, just not Ukraine, Syria, all over the place. I hear you. Senator Lindsey Graham, always great to talk to you. Thanks so much. Thank you. Alright. Straight ahead.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/2QiQ3kTUvI

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Piers Morgan Has Received Totally 100% Real and Accurate Lesson in Geopolitical History From Jeffrey Sachs ENJOY‼️‼️‼️ 📑You seem very reliant on accepting Putin's worldview rather than perhaps the stark reality of the barbarism with which he's executed this war. Yeah, maybe because I know too much about the United States. Because the first war in Europe after world War two was the US bombing of Belgrade for 78 days to change borders of a european state. The idea was to break Serbia, to create Kosovo as an enclave, and then to install Bondsteel, which is the largest NATO base in the Balkans, in the southwest Balkans. So the US started this under Clinton, that we will break the borders, we will illegally bomb another country. We didn't have any UN authority. This was a, quote, NATO mission to do that. Then I know the United States went to war repeatedly, illegally, in what it did in Afghanistan and then what it did in Iraq and then what it did in Syria, which was the Obama administration, especially Obama and Hillary Clinton, tasking the CIA to overthrow Bashar al Assad. And then what it did with NATO illegally bombing Libya to topple Muammar Gaddafi and then what it did in Kiev in February 2014. I happened to see some of that with my own eyes. The US overthrew Yanukovych together with right wing ukrainian military forces. We overthrew a president. And what's interesting, by the way, is we overthrew Yanukovych the day after the European Union representatives had reached an agreement with Yanukovych to have early elections, a government of national unity and a stand down of both sides that was agreed. The next thing that happens is the opposition, quote unquote, says, we don't agree. They stormed the government buildings and they deposed Yanukovych. And within hours, the United States says, yes, we support the new government. It didn't say, oh, we had an agreement that's unconstitutional what you did. So we overthrew a government contrary to a promise that the European Union had made. And by the way, Russia, the United States, and the EU were parties to that agreement. And the United States an hour afterwards backed the coup. Okay, so everyone's got a little bit to answer for. In 2015, the Russians did not say, we want the Donbas back. They said, peace should come through negotiations. And negotiations between the ethnic Russians in the east of Ukraine and this new regime in Kiev led to the Minsk II agreement. The Minsk II agreement was voted by the UN Security Council unanimously. It was signed by the government of Ukraine. It was guaranteed explicitly by Germany and France. And you know what? And it's been explained to me in person. It was laughed at inside the us government. This is after the UN Security Council unanimously accepted it. The Ukrainian said, we don't want to give autonomy to the region. Oh, but that's part of the treaty. The US told them, don't worry about it. Angela Merkel explained in Die Zeit in a notorious interview after the 2022 escalation. She said, oh, you know, we knew that Minsk two was just a holding pattern to give Ukraine time to build its strength. No, Minsk too was a UN security council unanimously adopted treaty that was supposed to end the war. So when it comes to who's trustworthy, who to believe and so forth, I guess my problem, Piers, is I know the United States government, I know it very well. I don't trust them for a moment. I want these two sides actually to sit down in front of the whole world and say, these are the terms. Then the world can judge, because we could get on paper clearly for both sides of the world, we're not going to overthrow governments anymore. The United States needs to say, we accept this agreement. The United States needs to say, Russia needs to say, we're not stepping 1ft farther than whatever the boundary is actually reached and NATO's not going to enlarge. And let's put it for the whole world to see once in a while, treaties actually hold.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The U.S. has a history of intervening in foreign conflicts without UN authority, such as the bombing of Belgrade, wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and the overthrow of Qaddafi in Libya. In Ukraine, the U.S. supported the ousting of Yanukovych despite a prior agreement for early elections and national unity. The Minsk II agreement, aimed at resolving the conflict in Eastern Ukraine, was ignored by the U.S. government, which viewed it as a means for Ukraine to strengthen militarily. Trust in the U.S. is lacking, and there is a call for both sides to negotiate openly, with clear terms that prevent future interventions and respect existing boundaries. Treaties should be upheld for lasting peace.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: You seem very reliant on accepting Putin's worldview rather than perhaps the stark reality of the barbarism with which he's executed this war? Speaker 1: Yeah. May maybe because I know too much about the United States. Because the first war in Europe after World War 2 was the US bombing of Belgrade for 78 days to change borders of a European state. The idea was to break Serbia to create Kosovo as an enclave and then to install Bondasteel, which is the largest NATO base in the Balkans, in the Southwest Balkans. So the US started this under Clinton, that we will break the borders. We will illegally bomb another country. We didn't have any UN authority. This was a quote NATO mission to do that. Then I know the United States, went to war repeatedly, illegally, in what it did in Afghanistan and then what it did in Iraq, and then what it did in Syria, which was the Obama administration, especially Obama and Hillary Clinton tasking the CIA to overthrow Bashar al Assad, and then what it did with NATO illegally bombing Libya to topple Nurmur Qaddafi. And then what it did in Kiev in February 2014. I happened to see some of that with my own eyes. The US overthrew Yanukovych together with right wing Ukrainian military forces. We overthrew a president. And what's interesting, by the way, is we overthrew Yanukovych the day after the European Union representatives had reached an agreement with Yanukovych to have early elections, a government of national unity, and a stand down of both sides. That was agreed. The next thing that happens is the opposition, says, we don't agree. They stormed the government buildings and they deposed Yanukovych. And within hours, the United States says, yes. We support the new government. It didn't say, oh, we had an agreement. That's unconstitutional what you did. So we overthrew a government contrary to a promise that the European Union had made. And by the way, Russia, the United States, and the EU were parties to that agreement, and the United States an hour afterwards backed the coup. Okay. So everyone's got a little bit to answer for. In 2015, the, Russians did not say, we want the Donbas back. They said peace should come through negotiations, and negotiations between the ethnic Russians in the east of Ukraine and this new regime in Kyiv led to the Minsk two agreement. The Minsk 2 agreement was voted by the UN Security Council unanimously. It was signed by the government of Ukraine. It was guaranteed explicitly by Germany and France, And you know what? And it's been explained to me in person. It was laughed at inside the US government. This is after the UN Security Council unanimously accepted it. The Ukrainian said, we don't wanna give autonomy to the region. Oh, but that's part of the treaty. The US told them, don't worry about it. Angela Merkel explained in in a notorious interview after the 2022 escalation. She said, oh, you know, we knew that Minsk 2 was just a a holding pattern to give Ukraine time to build its strength. No. Minsk 2 was a UN Security Council unanimously adopted treaty that was supposed to end the war. So when it comes to who's trustworthy, who to believe and so forth, I guess my problem, Pew, is is I know the United States government. I know it very well. I don't trust them for a moment. I want these two sides actually to sit down in front of the whole world and say these are the terms, then the world can judge because we could get on paper clearly for both sides of the world. We're not gonna overthrow governments anymore, the United States needs to say. We accept this agreement, the United States needs to say. Russia needs to say. We're not stepping one foot farther than whatever the boundary is actually reached, and NATO's not going to enlarge. And let's put it for the whole world to see. You know, once in a while treaties actually hold.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/ET4HGOvsd3

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Russia is Aggressively Approaching NATO More Than 1000 km Everything Is Putin’s Fault! "Not About Nato" | "Never About NATO" | "Nothing to Do With NATO" | UKRAINE WAR NATO training, NATO weapons, NATO mercenaries, NATO specialists, NATO intelligence, NATO money. ... but nothing to do with NATO. Facts 👇

Video Transcript AI Summary

President Putin sent a draft treaty to NATO, demanding no further enlargement as a condition to avoid invading Ukraine, which NATO rejected. The conflict is not about NATO expansion; it's about democracy and Putin's desire to expand his influence. Ukraine is facing internal issues, such as banning political parties and restricting freedoms, while the war is framed as a fight for democracy. Some draw parallels between Putin and historical figures like Hitler, suggesting that his actions are reminiscent of past aggressions. Ultimately, the narrative emphasizes that NATO is not the core issue; the war stems from Putin's ambitions and actions.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: President Putin actually sent a draft treaty that they wanted NATO to sign to promise no more NATO enlargement. That was what he sent us. And that was a precondition for not invade Ukraine. Of course, we didn't sign that. So he went to war to prevent NATO, more NATO close to his borders. Speaker 1: Flashback. Speaker 0: This is fundamentally not about NATO expansion. Speaker 1: It was never about NATO enlargement. It's not about NATO. It's not Speaker 2: about NATO expanding toward Russia. This was never about NATO? It's absolutely nothing to do with NATO expansionism. Speaker 1: It has nothing to do with NATO. This is not about NATO. It's not about NATO. It's not really about NATO. Speaker 2: This is not about NATO. Seriously, it's not about NATO. This was never about NATO. Speaker 1: It was never about NATO. Let's be honest. Speaker 2: This doesn't have anything to do with NATO. Nothing to do with NATO at all. Speaker 1: Yeah. He's claiming it's, like, security purposes, but we can see the clear reason. But Speaker 2: NATO is not the reason. Speaker 1: This is not about NATO expansion. This is about the democratic expansion. Speaker 2: Ukraine bans religious organizations. We are protecting democracy right now. Ukraine is banning political parties. Because it's a democracy. Ukraine restricts books and music. It's about democracy. Ukraine won't hold elections. Elections. Speaker 1: It's about democracy. And it's not Speaker 2: about NATO expansion. This war Speaker 1: in Ukraine is not about NATO. Speaker 2: It's not about NATO. It's not about NATO. It Speaker 1: has nothing to do with NATO. Nothing to do with NATO expansion. It's not about NATO expansion. Speaker 2: Nothing to do with Speaker 3: with NATO. It isn't really Speaker 2: about NATO. It's not about NATO. It's not about NATO enlargement. In fact, it has nothing to do with NATO. It's not about NATO encroaching. Speaker 1: So it's Speaker 2: not about NATO. NATO is just as a fictitious imaginary adversary for for Speaker 1: for mister Putin and for Russia. Speaker 2: It was never about NATO. Speaker 1: That's not what it's been about. It's been about him trying to expand his sphere of influence. Speaker 3: Hang on. I mean, the 2 are not mutually exclusive. Obviously, Russia has wished for a sphere of influence over Ukraine. But if the west had not challenged Russian interests so directly, I think that there there was a chance to avoid this war. Speaker 0: He wanted us to sign the promise never to enlarge NATO. We rejected that. Speaker 1: The reason why Putin invaded Ukraine Speaker 2: is because of his evil Evil. Speaker 0: It's about that Putin wants to rebuild Soviet empire of evil like president Reagan told. Speaker 2: It's about Putin being sick. I don't know how you negotiate peace with a madman, but nobody negotiated with Hitler. People were comparing him to Hitler. Hitler. Remember Hitler? Speaker 1: He's a Hitler. Speaker 2: We're back when the the Nazis invaded Poland. Speaker 1: This is exactly the same Speaker 2: what Hitler was doing to choose. Speaker 1: This is the same. Putin will not stop. Speaker 2: Putin is reminiscent of Hitler. Hitler. This reminds me of Speaker 1: Hitler. Hitler. Hitler. Speaker 3: He's the new Hitler. Speaker 1: Oh, Hitler. Speaker 2: This is about a butcher trying to kill people everywhere in the world, just not Ukraine, Syria, all over the place. I hear you. Senator Lindsey Graham, it was great to talk to you. Thanks so much. Thank you. Alright. Straight ahead.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/oSN20t4Bpu

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

MUST WATCH👏👏👏‼️‼️‼️ Ukraine war cause and the end game explained: War of the globalist elite, Blackrock, and bankers. Colonel Douglas Macgregor: 📑 In Ukraine, which I think happening there. And what, do you know, what is the end game? Well, for the globalists that are running the show, this is a globalist neocon elite, both on the hill as well as in the White House. And these elites in Europe, particularly in Paris, Berlin, London, they're all interested in seeing Blackrock take over Ukraine, number one, so that it can be systematically stripped of its resources and turned into a subjugated state that belongs to the larger globalist elites. But they also want to see that happen to Russia, which is why this war was never about Ukraine. It was always about what can be done to destroy Russia. And of course, since the people in charge didn't perform any strategic analysis, they never thought about purpose, method, or end state. They concluded that Russia today is still the Russia of 1992. It's weak, it's prostrate, its economy is ineffective. Remember the McCain statement, oh, Russia is Spain with a gas station. All of these arrogant displays of american hubris, treating Russia as though it was a third class nation with a fourth class military. Well, we're getting an education right now. We paid no attention to the Russians, who had legitimate concerns about what we were doing in eastern Ukraine. We were building an army to attack them. We put a hostile government into that country in 2014. And we kept telling them that it made no difference to us what they thought or what they cared about. They said, we don't want NATO on our border. No one paid attention. President Trump tried to listen, but he was surrounded by people who subverted him, people who were not loyal to the president, who took an oath of obedience to the orders of the president and then ignored them. So what's the outcome? You've got a very serious war that could become regional, even global, and no one in the White House seems to really grasp that. But we're losing. The globalists are losing. And when the ground dries, and in June, you're going to see a massive russian offensive. And most of what we call this thing called Ukraine is going to be swept away, especially that government in Kiev. But that government doesn't represent the interests of the ukrainian people. They represent the interests of this globalist elite who are interested in resources and stripping them and using them and exploiting them to make money. Yeah, it feels like the biggest threat to America is actually what's happened to the petrodollar. When you have Putin now talking with the Saudis and Putin now talking with Xi, and you get rid of the petrodollar, and all of a sudden all that borrowing that we do where we're living way above our means, that's no longer possible, plausible or worse. I think what you're saying is this war has become financial as well as military. And the globalists understand that they're going to lose this war. And what will come of this is that the BRICS, Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, are going to be increased by 81 additional members. And all of these people are going to go to a currency that is backed by gold. And once they go to that currency backed by gold, whether it is one currency or a basket of currencies, it doesn't make any difference. Yes, we are in a lot of trouble. The globalists know that, and it is why they are so desperate right now. And the greatest fear that I have is that when the Russians do attack and it becomes abundantly clear that Ukraine is finished, I mean, it's already obvious to anybody who visits the place for any length of time. It's in ruins. But once that occurs, I fear that there will be pressure to commit US forces in Poland and Romania, along with Polish forces and potentially Romanian ones, to western Ukraine. And if that occurs, the gloves will come off, because truthfully, thus far, Putin has exercised tremendous restraint, tremendous patience. He does not want a war with the west. If he wanted that, wed already have it. But if we intervene in western Ukraine, it's over. We'll be in a full fledged war. Expand on that a little bit, because it's sort of interesting. You know, I think we grossly miscalculated. Putin had made several speeches over the last 20 years, repeatedly saying, please do not advance the border to Russia. Do not try to transform Ukraine into a hostile actor, an actor with hostile intentions towards Russia. What happens in Ukraine is of existential strategic interest to us, just as theoretically, what happens in Mexico is of existential strategic interest to us. Although this administration has decided to ignore it. He expected that we would negotiate, that he would demonstrate that this was serious, and that Russia wanted its population in eastern Ukraine, which is really russian, to have equal rights before the law. He wanted to end the oppression of the Russians that lived there, and he wasn't going to surrender Crimea. The reason he went into Crimea is he was afraid it was going to be turned into a US naval base. Biden said. Our goal is regime change. Our goal is to get rid of Putin, and our goal is ultimately to divide Russia into constituent parts, then exploit it. All of his supporters, his staffers, everyone in the globalist camp knows this is the truth. The so called oligarchs Kolomoisky, Soros and others were all part of this. None of this is news. Finally, he said, enough's enough. He stopped. They set up a strategic defense. They ran an economy of force mission, and now they have a force in place that can go as far as it needs to go, which includes to the polish border. They have a plan for 31, 31 month war against us if we insist on fighting it. And we are in no shape to fight a war. We can't even recruit the United States army or the Marines. The Marines are running around trying to recruit illegals and are being encouraged to do so by the administration. Is that what you want in the ground force, to fight for this country? Forget it. It's not going to work.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The conflict in Ukraine is driven by globalist elites aiming to exploit the region's resources, with a focus on undermining Russia rather than supporting Ukraine. The current U.S. leadership has underestimated Russia, failing to recognize its strategic interests and the consequences of NATO's expansion. The war has financial implications, with the potential shift away from the petrodollar threatening U.S. economic stability. As Russia prepares for a significant offensive, there are concerns about U.S. military involvement in Eastern Europe, which could escalate into a larger conflict. Putin has shown restraint but may respond aggressively if Western forces intervene. The situation reflects a severe miscalculation by U.S. leadership, which is unprepared for a prolonged military engagement.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Or in Ukraine, which is happening there. What do you you know, what what is the endgame? Speaker 1: Well, for the globalists that are running the show, this is a globalist neo con elite in both on the hill as well as in the White House and these elites in Europe, particularly in Paris, Berlin, London. They're all interested in seeing BlackRock take over Ukraine, number 1, so that it can be systematically stripped of its resources and turned into a subjugated state that belongs to the larger globalist elites. But they also wanna see that happen to Russia, which is why this war was never about Ukraine. It was always about what can be done to destroy Russia. And, of course, since the people in charge didn't perform any strategic analysis, they never thought about purpose, method, or end state. They concluded that Russia today is still the Russia of 1992. It's weak. It's prostrate. Its economy is ineffective. Remember the McCain statement? Oh, Russia is Spain with a gas station. All of these arrogant displays of American hubris, treating Russia as though it was a third class nation with a 4th class military. Well, we're getting an education right now. We paid no attention to the Russians who had legitimate concerns about what we were doing in Eastern Ukraine. We were building an army to attack them. We put a hostile government into that country in 2014, and we kept telling them that it made no difference to us what they thought or what they cared about. They said we don't want NATO on our border. No 1 paid attention. President Trump tried to listen, but he was surrounded by people who subverted him. People who are not loyal to the president, who who took an oath of obedience to the orders of the president and then ignored them. So what's what's the outcome? You've got a very serious war that could become regional, even global, and no 1 in the White House seems to really grasp that. But we're losing. The globalists are losing. And when the ground dries and in June, you're straight you're gonna see a massive Russian offensive, and most of what we call this thing called Ukraine is gonna be swept away, especially that government in Kyiv. But that government doesn't represent the interest of the Ukrainian people. They represent the interest of this globalist elite who are interested in resources and stripping them and using them and exploiting them to make money. Speaker 0: Yeah. It feels like, you know, the biggest threat to America is actually what's happened to the petrodollar. When you have Putin now talking with the Saudis and Putin now talking with Xi, and you get rid of the petrodollar and all of a sudden all that borrowing that we do, where we're living way above our means, that's no longer possible, plausible, or or worse. Speaker 1: I think what you're saying is this war has become financial as well as military, and the globalists understand that they're going to lose this war. And what will come of this is that the BRICS, Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, are going to be increased by 81 additional members. And all of these people are going to go to a currency that is backed by gold. And once they go to that currency backed by gold, whether it is 1 currency or a basket of currencies, it doesn't make any difference. Yes. We are in a lot of trouble. The globalists know that, and it is why they are so desperate right now. And the greatest fear that I have is that when the Russians do attack and it becomes abundantly clear that Ukraine is finished. I mean, it's already obvious to anybody who visits a place for any length of time. It's in ruins. But once that occurs, I fear that there will be pressure to commit US forces in Poland and Romania along with Polish forces and potentially Romanian ones to Western Ukraine. And if that occurs, the gloves will come off because truthfully, thus far, Putin has exercised tremendous restraint, tremendous patience. He does not want a war with the west. If he wanted that, we'd already have it. But if we intervene in Western Ukraine, it's over. We'll be in a full fledged war. Speaker 0: Expand on that a little bit because it's sort of interesting. You know? Speaker 1: I think we've grossly miscalculated. Putin had made several speeches over the last 20 years repeatedly saying, please do not advance the border to Russia. Do not try to transform Ukraine into a hostile actor, an actor with hostile intentions towards Russia. What happens in Ukraine is of the existential strategic interest to us just as theoretically, what happens in Mexico is of existential strategic interest to us, although this administration has decided to ignore it. He expected that we would negotiate, that he would demonstrate that this was serious and that Russia wanted wanted its population in Eastern Ukraine, which is really Russian, to have equal rights before the law. He wanted to end the oppression of the Russians that lived there, and he wasn't going to surrender Crimea. The reason he went into Crimea is he was afraid he was gonna be turned into a US naval base. Biden said, our goal is regime change. Our goal is to get rid of Putin, and our goal is ultimately to divide Russia into constituent parts then exploit it. All of his supporters, his staffers, everyone in the globalist camp knows this is the truth. The so called oligarchs, Kolomoisky, Soros, and others were all part of this. None of this is news. Finally, he said, enough's enough. He stopped. They set up a strategic defense. They ran an economy of force mission, and now they have a force in place that can go as far as it needs to go, which includes to the Polish border. They have a plan for a 31 31 month war against us if we insist on fighting it, and we are in no shape to fight a war. We can't even recruit the United States Army or the Marines. The Marines are running around trying to recruit illegals and are being encouraged to do so by the administration. Is that is that what you want in the ground force to fight for this country? Forget it. It's not gonna work.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/foarxpw0Dl

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

The Ukraine - Russian War Was Provoked! Finally the Truth Be Told!!! Jeffrey Sachs: The Untold History of the Cold War Thanks Tucker for bringing the truth to light! Everyone Should Read This! The Ukraine - Russian War was planned well in advance. Professor Jeffrey Sachs is the President of the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network and Director of the Center for Sustainable Development at Columbia University. He is the author of many best selling books, including The End of Poverty and The Ages of Globalization. Here he is with probably the smartest and most accurate assessment of the Ukraine war, and American foreign policy more broadly, ever caught on tape.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The invasion of Ukraine by Russia in February 2022 was labeled unprovoked, but the narrative oversimplifies complex geopolitical dynamics. The U.S. aimed to align Ukraine with NATO, encroaching on Russia's borders, a strategy rooted in historical imperialism dating back to the 19th century. This expansionist approach disregarded Russia's concerns, which had sought cooperation after the Cold War. Promises made to Russian leaders about NATO's non-expansion were broken, leading to heightened tensions. The U.S. actions, including military bases and missile deployments near Russia, were perceived as aggressive, prompting a defensive response from Moscow. Ultimately, the situation reflects a long-term strategy of U.S. dominance rather than a mere unprovoked attack.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Okay. So the the one thing that we know, we heard about the movement of Russian troops into Eastern Ukraine in February of 2022 was it was unprovoked. Here's a here's a selection of what we know about that. Speaker 1: Russian military has begun a brutal assault on the people of Ukraine without provocation, without justification, without necessity. This is a premeditated attack. Russia's unprovoked and cruel invasion has galvanized countries from around the world. Speaker 0: Russia's unprovoked and unjustified attack on Ukraine. Speaker 1: Russia conducted an unprovoked war of aggression against Ukraine. This unprovoked Russian war of aggression has got to be met with strength. Speaker 0: Vladimir Putin decided, unprovoked, to start this war. So was it unprovoked? Speaker 1: Well, we did hear that a lot of times. That's what I said. I I actually asked a research assistant of mine to count how many times we heard that in the New York Times in that 1st year from February 2022 to February 2023. In their opinion, comps was 26 times unprovoked. Of course, things aren't unprovoked. It's almost a brand Speaker 0: name. Unprovoked invasion. Speaker 1: It's it's the lazy person's dodge for, actually trying to think through what's going on, and it's And it's very dangerous because it's wrong. It gets the whole story completely wrong, and it misunderstands the trap that we set for ourselves as the United States to push Ukraine deeper and deeper and deeper into this hopeless mess that they're in right now. Speaker 0: So in what sense was it provoked? Like, what started this? Speaker 1: Basically, it started very simply, which is, that the United States government, let's not call it the US people, they had nothing to do with this, but the US government, said, we're gonna put Ukraine on our side, and we're gonna go right up to that 2,100 kilometer border with Russia. We're gonna put our troops and NATO and maybe missiles, whatever we want because we are the sole superpower of the world, and we do what we want. And, it it goes back actually a long way. It goes back a 170 years. The Brits had this idea first. Surround Russia in the Black Sea region, and Russia's not a great power anymore. And that was, Lord Palmerston's idea in the Crimean War 1853 to 1856. And the Brits taught us what we know about empire, and they basically taught us the idea. You know, Russia, it needs an outlet. It needs an outlet to the Middle East. It needs an outlet to the Mediterranean. You surround Russia in the Black Sea. You have rendered Russia a second or third rate country and Zbig Brzezinski, one of our lead geo strategists of the current era, wrote in 1997, let's do this. Let's make sure that we basically surround Russia in in the Black Sea region. They got this idea that we'll expand NATO so that every country in the Black Sea around Russia is a NATO country. Right now, well, back then, Turkey was a NATO country but we said, okay, we'll get Romania and Bulgaria and we'll get Ukraine and we'll get Georgia. Now Georgia, not our Georgia, Atlanta Georgia, Georgia of the Black Sea. We used to call Speaker 0: it Soviet Georgia. Speaker 1: Yes. Soviet Georgia, if you want call it that. Home of Stalin. It's not NATO North Atlantic. It's way out there on the eastern edge of the Black Sea region. People can look at a map. But we said, yeah. We'll make Georgia part of NATO too. And the reason was very clear, and Zwig was very explicit about it that this is our way to basically dominate Eurasia. If we can dominate the Black Sea region, then Russia's nothing. If we make Russia nothing, then we can basically control Eurasia, meaning all the way from Europe to Central Asia, and through our influence in East Asia, do the same thing and that's American unipolarity. We run the world. We are the hegemon. We are the sole superpower. We are unchallenged. So that's the idea. Speaker 0: But why would you want that? Why would the Brits want that? Why does the US State Department want that? What about Russia, which is not actually much of an expansionist power, is so threatening? Speaker 1: It's it's, it's not about Russia. It's about the US. It's it's about Britain before that. I think it's a little bit like that old game of risk. I don't know if you played that as a kid, but you the idea was have your peace on every place in the world. You know? That that was the game. And you read the American strategist, whether it's Zbig Brzezinski, although he's a very moderate, or the neocons who have run US foreign policy for the last 30 years. US the the the neocons are very explicit. The US must be the unchallenged superpower in every place in the world. In every region, we must dominate. It's quite a it's quite a load for us American people. What they say is we are going to be the constabulary duty holder. What a fancy word for saying, we'll be the world's policeman. They they say it explicitly. They say that's lots of wars. We have to be ready for all these wars. To my mind, it's a little crazy but their idea was after the end of the Soviet Union, well, now we run the world. And to come back to Russia, the idea was, well, Russia's weak. It's down. It's we're the sole superpower. They're they're on on their back or on their knees, whatever it is, and now we can move NATO where we want, and we can surround them. And, the Russians said, please don't do that. Don't don't bring your troops, your weapons, your missiles right up to our border. It's not a good idea. And the US, I was around in those years involved in in Russia and in Central Europe. The US was, we don't hear you. We don't hear you. We do what we want. They kept pushing inside the US government in the 19 nineties when this debate was going, should NATO expand? Some people said, yeah. But, we told Gorbachev, and we told Yeltsin we weren't gonna expand at all. No. Come on. Soviet Union's done. We can do what we want. We're the sole superpower. Clinton bought into that. That was Madeleine Albright's line. NATO enlargement started, and our most sophisticated diplomats, we used to have diplomats at the time. We don't have them anymore, but we used used to have diplomats like George Kennan, said this is the greatest mistake we could possibly make. We had the defense secretary, Bill Perry, who was Clinton's defense secretary, who agonized, god. I should resign over this. This is terrible. What's going on? But he was outmaneuvered diplomatically by Richard Holbrook and by Madeleine Albright, and Clinton never thought through anything systematically, in my opinion. And so they decided, okay. Hungary, Poland, Czech Republic, 1st round. And then Brzezinski, in the 1997 article in Foreign Affairs Magazine, which is kind of the bellwether of Yes. Foreign policy, wrote a strategy for Eurasia where he laid out exactly the timeline for this US expansion of power, and he said late 19 nineties will take in Central Europe, Hungary, Poland, Czech Republic. By the early 2000, we'll take in the Baltic states. Now let's get close to Russia. By 2005 to 2010, we'll invite Ukraine to become part of NATO. So this wasn't some flippant thing. This was a long term plan and was based on a long term geo strategy. Now the Russians are saying, are you kidding? We wanted peace. We we ended the Cold War 2. You didn't just defeat us. We said, no more. We disbanded the Warsaw Pact. We wanted peace. We wanted cooperation. You call it victory. We we just wanted to cooperate. I know that for a fact because I was there in those years, what Gorbachev wanted, what Yeltsin wanted. They didn't want war with the United States nor were they saying we're defeated. They were saying we just wanna cooperate. We wanna stop the Cold War. We wanna become part of a world economy. We wanna be a normal economy. We wanna be a normal society connected with you, connected with Europe, connected with Asia. And the US said, we get it. We get it. We won. You do everything we say, and we determine how the pieces are gonna go. So in the early 2000, Putin comes in. First business for Putin was good cooperation with Europe. You go back to the early 2000s. Again, I know the people. I watch closely. I was a participant in some of it. Putin was completely pro Europe and pro US, by the way. And we don't wanna talk about this. We don't wanna admit it because we don't want anything other than unprovoked. So everything is phony, what we say. Everything is a lie. But just to say, the US kept doing unilateral things that were really outrageous. In 2,000 in 1999, we bombed Belgrade for 78 days. Bad move. Absolutely. We bombed a capital of Europe for 78 days. Speaker 0: What was looking back, what was the point of that? Speaker 1: The the point of that was to break Serbia into create a new state Kosovo where we have the largest NATO military base in Southeast Europe. We put bond steel base there because we wanted a base in Southeastern Europe, and again, you look at the neocons. It's nice of them. They actually describe all of this in various documents. You have to make the links, but in a document called rebuilding America's defenses in the year 2000, they say the Balkans is a new strategic area for the US. So we have to move large troops to the Balkans because their idea is literally the game of risk, not just you need good relations or peace. We need our pieces on the board. We need military bases with the advanced positioning of our military everywhere in the world. So they wanted a big base in, in Southeastern Europe. They didn't like Serbia. Serbia was close to Russia. Anyway, we're the sole superpower. We do what we want. So, they divided the country, which they now claim you never do and you never change borders. We broke apart Serbia, established by our declaration a new country, Kosovo. We put a huge NATO base there, and that was the goal. So that was 99. Speaker 0: It wasn't to save the oppressed Muslim population? Speaker 1: Excuse me? Speaker 0: It wasn't to save the oppressed Muslim population? Speaker 1: It was very much to save the military industrial complex to have a nice location in Southeastern Europe. It killed all those people, wrecked the city. It was a little bit sad, but we do lots of sad things and lots of destructive things, lots of wars. We're the country of perpetual war. We don't look back. We're not even supposed to talk about this because this was unprovoked, remember? So in 2002, the US unilaterally pulled out of the anti ballistic missile treaty, unilaterally. Well, that was one of the stabilizers of the relationship with Russia and it was one of the stabilizers of the the global nuclear situation, which is absolutely dangerous. And the US unilaterally started putting Aegis missiles into, first, Poland, then Romania. And the Russians are saying, wait a minute. What do we know you're putting in this? You're a few minutes from Moscow. This is completely destabilizing. Do you think you might wanna talk to us? So then comes 2004, 7 more countries in NATO, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Romania, Bulgaria, Slovakia, and Slovenia. Now, starting filling in the Black Sea, Romania and Bulgaria. Suddenly, they're now North Atlantic countries but it's all part of this design, all spelled out, all quite explicit. We're surrounding Russia. In 2007, President Putin gave a very clear speech at the Munich Security Conference, very powerful, very correct, very frustrated where he said, gentlemen, you told us in 1990 NATO would never enlarge. That was the promise made to President Gorbachev, and it was the promise made to President Yeltsin, and you cheated, and you repeatedly cheated, and you don't even admit that you said this, but it's all plainly documented, by the way, and as you know, in a 1,000 archival sites, so it's easy to verify all of this. James Baker III, our secretary of state, said that NATO would not move 1 inch eastward, and it wasn't a flippant statement. It was a statement repeated and repeated and repeated. Hans Dietrich Genscher, the foreign minister of Germany, same story. The Germans wanted reunification. Gorbachev said, we'll support that, but we don't want that to come at our expense. No. No. It won't come at your expense. NATO won't move 1 inch eastward, mister president, repeated so many times in many documents, many statements by the NATO secretary general, by the US secretary of state, by, the German chancellor, now, of course, all denied by our foreign policy blob because we're not supposed to remember anything. Remember, this was all unprovoked. So back to 2007, Putin gives this speech and he says, stop. Don't even think about Ukraine. This is our 2,100 kilometer border. This is absolutely part of the integrated economy of this region. Don't even think about it. Now I know from insiders, from all the diplomatic work that I do, that Europe was saying to the US European leaders, don't think about Ukraine, please. This is not a good idea. Just stop. We know, from our current CIA director, Bill Burns, that he wrote a very eloquent, impassioned, articulate, clear, secret as usual memo, which we only got to see because WikiLeaks showed to the American people what maybe we would like to know once in a while, but Yeah. We're never told. Speaker 0: What our government's doing. Speaker 1: What they're doing and how they're putting us at nuclear risk and other things. Okay. This one did get out, and it's called niet means niet. No means no. And what what Bill Burns very perceptively, articulately conveys to Condoleezza Rice and back to the White House in, 2008 is Ukraine is really a red line. Don't do it. It's not just Putin. It's not just Putin's government. It's the entire political class of Russia. And just to help all of us as we think about it, it is exactly, as if Mexico said, we think it would be great to have Chinese military bases on the Rio Grande. We can't see why the US would have any problem with that. Of course, we would go completely insane. But And we should. And we should. Of course. It's the whole idea is so absurdly dangerous and reckless that you you can't even imagine grown ups doing this. So what happens is the what for what I'm told by European leaders, and by long detailed discussion, Bush junior says to them, no, no, no, no, it's okay. Don't worry. I hear you about Ukraine. And then he goes off for the Christmas holidays and comes back, whether it's Cheney, whether it's Bush, whatever it is, says, yeah, NATO's gonna enlarge to Ukraine. And the Europeans are shocked, pissed. What are you doing?

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/VVJnZeGuMR

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

They promised NATO would not expand to the East! At the🇩🇪reunification meeting (GDR and FRG) in 1990,🇩🇪Foreign Minister Hans-Dietrich Genscher told his US counterpart, James Baker, that NATO would not expand to the East. Present also is E. Schevardnadze, Soviet Foreign Minister. https://t.co/pIvSMNMQfi

Video Transcript AI Summary

Der Westen verspricht, die NATO nicht weiter nach Osten auszudehnen, im Gegenzug zur deutschen Einheit. In Washington erklärt der damalige Außenminister, dass es keine Absicht gibt, das Radioverteidigungsgebiet nach Osten auszudehnen. Dies betrifft nicht nur die DDR, die nicht einverleibt werden soll, sondern gilt allgemein. --- In exchange for German reunification, the West promises not to expand NATO further east. In Washington, the then Secretary of State states that there is no intention to extend the radio defense area eastward. This applies not only to the GDR, which is not to be incorporated, but is a general principle.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Im Gegenzug zur deutschen Einheit verspricht der Westen, die NATO nicht weiter nach Osten vorrücken zu lassen. In Washington macht der damalige Außenminister weitreichende Zusagen. Speaker 1: Wir waren uns einig, dass nicht die Absicht besteht, das Radioverteidigungsgebiet auszudehnen nach Osten. Das gilt übrigens nicht nur in Bezug auf die DDR, die wir da nicht einverleiben wollen, sondern das gilt ganz generell.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/kPF0iHBmY2

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Brilliant!!! The best video @0rf ‼️👏👏👏 Watch Matt Orfalea Bitch Slap Those Who Said The Ukraine Invasion Was "Not About NATO" The biggest threat in the world is NATO. NATO exists to solve the problems created by NATO’s existence. NATO is a military alliance that feeds on war. To justify its existence, NATO constantly needs an external enemies and conflicts. NATO DISBAND!

Video Transcript AI Summary

President Putin sent a draft treaty to NATO, demanding no further enlargement as a precondition to avoid invading Ukraine, which NATO rejected. The conflict is not about NATO expansion; it revolves around democracy and Ukraine's internal policies, such as banning religious organizations and political parties. This war is fundamentally about Putin's desire to expand his influence and rebuild a Soviet-like empire. Comparisons are drawn between Putin and historical figures like Hitler, emphasizing that he poses a broader threat beyond Ukraine. The situation reflects a struggle against tyranny rather than a direct confrontation with NATO.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: President Putin actually sent a draft treaty that he wanted NATO to sign to promise no more NATO enlargement. That was what he sent us. And that was a precondition for not invade Ukraine. Of course, we didn't sign that. Speaker 1: So he went to war to prevent NATO, more NATO across his borders. Flashback. Speaker 0: This is fundamentally not about NATO expansion. Speaker 1: It's never about NATO enlargement. Speaker 2: It's not about NATO. It's not about NATO expanding toward Russia. Speaker 1: This was never about NATO? Speaker 2: It's absolutely nothing to do with NATO expansionism. And it has nothing to do with NATO. This is not about NATO. Speaker 1: It's not about NATO. It's not really about NATO. This is not about NATO. Speaker 2: Seriously, it's not about NATO. Speaker 1: This was never about NATO. Speaker 3: It was never about NATO. Let's be honest. This doesn't have anything to do with NATO? Speaker 1: Nothing to do with NATO at all. Speaker 2: Yeah. He's claiming it's, like, security purposes, but we can see the clear reason. But NATO is not the reason. Speaker 1: This is not about NATO expansion. This is about the democratic expansion. Ukraine bans religious organizations. We are protecting democracy right now. Ukraine is banning political parties. Because it's a democracy. Ukraine restricts books and music. It's about democracy. Ukraine won't hold elections. It's about democracy. And it's not about NATO expansion. Speaker 2: This war Speaker 1: in Ukraine is not about NATO. Speaker 2: It's not about NATO. It's not about NATO. It has nothing to do with NATO. Nothing to do with NATO expansion. Speaker 1: It's not about Speaker 3: NATO expansion. Speaker 1: Nothing to do with with NATO. Speaker 2: It isn't really about NATO. Speaker 1: It's not about NATO. It's not about NATO enlargement. In fact, it has nothing to do with NATO. Speaker 2: It's not about NATO encroaching. Speaker 1: So it's not about NATO. NATO is just as a fictitious imaginary adversary for Speaker 2: for for mister Putin and for Russia. Speaker 1: It was never about NATO. Speaker 3: That's not what it's been about. It's been about him trying to expand his sphere of influence. Speaker 4: Hang on. I mean, the 2 are not mutually exclusive. Obviously, Russia has wished for a sphere of influence over Ukraine. But if the west had not challenged Russian interests so directly, I think that there there was a chance to avoid this war. Speaker 2: He wanted us to sign Speaker 0: a promise never to enlarge NATO. We rejected that. Speaker 2: The reason why Putin invaded Ukraine is because of his evil Evil. It's about that Putin wants to rebuild Soviet empire of evil like president Reagan told. Speaker 1: It's about Putin being sick. Because I don't Speaker 2: know how you negotiate peace with a madman, but nobody negotiated with Hitler. Speaker 1: People were comparing him to Hitler. To Hitler. And remember Hitler? Speaker 2: He's a Hitler. Speaker 1: We're back when the the Nazis invaded Poland. Speaker 2: This is exactly the same what Hitler was doing to choose. This is the same. Putin will not stop. Speaker 4: Putin Speaker 1: Putin is reminiscent of Hitler. Hitler. Speaker 2: This reminds me of Hitler. Hitler. Hitler. Speaker 4: He's the new Hitler. Speaker 1: Who Hitler? This is about a butcher trying to kill people everywhere in the world, just not Ukraine, Syria, all over the place. I hear you. Senator Lindsey Graham, always great to talk to you. Thanks so much. Thank you. Alright. Straight ahead.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/f8yZsUdiuw

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

‼️ Ukraine War Was Provoked — Jeffrey Sachs Going Underground host Afshin Rattansi discusses the Ukraine conflict and the actions of the West, which provoked the war, with Jeffrey Sachs, President of the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network. #GoingUnderground #JeffreySachs You know that the so called journalists, some would say stenographers, are repeating this word unprovoked when it comes to Russia moving to save the ethnic Russians in the east. What do you do? You just flinch every time you hear this phrase unprovoked, which is used by. I don't flinch. I laugh. And yes, I do cringe a little bit, because, first of all, this is a provoked war. Second, the word unprovoked is provoked in the sense that it is part of the talking points of all of these reporters. They wouldn't even come up with the same word, same exact word repeated endlessly were it not so phoney. So this is a war that had many provocations. It was a war that could easily have been avoided. When I say many provocations, it goes back to the US plan to expand NATO to Ukraine and Georgia, back to the 1990s. Does big Brzezinski, contrary to promises that were made at the end of what we thought was the end of the Cold War, I should say the unilateral US withdrawal from the ABM treaty in 2002, the 78 days of bombing of Belgrade by the United States and its allies in 1999 to break that country apart and install a NATO military base in Kosovo carved out from Serbia. The overthrow of Viktor Yanukovych in February 2014, where Victoria Nuland, the assistant secretary of state for european affairs at the time, was point person for this and absolutely in collaboration on regime change. The absolute failure of the US, Germany and France to abide by, defend and insist on the implementation of the Minsk, two agreements provoked. Of course it was provoked. Wars don't come out of nowhere. And anyone watching the history of this has seen these provocations all along. And a point that I keep making is that at the end of 2021, this was already nine years into conflict, which started with the overthrow of Yanukovych by the United States and right wing forces in Ukraine. Nine years later, the big war could have been avoided and the fighting could have stopped when Russia put on the table a revised U. S. Russia security arrangement based on Ukraine's neutrality, on the non enlargement of NATO. And I told the White House, then take it. Negotiate. Of course, there, you phoned them up. But negotiate? I mean, did you speak to the State Department? I spoke to the White House and I said, don't have a war over this. This is obviously avoidable.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The term "unprovoked" used by journalists regarding Russia's actions is misleading. This war has numerous provocations, stemming from U.S. actions like NATO expansion plans since the 1990s, the 2002 withdrawal from the ABM Treaty, and the 1999 bombing of Belgrade. The overthrow of Viktor Yanukovych in 2014, supported by U.S. officials, and the failure to uphold the Minsk II agreements also contributed to the conflict. By the end of 2021, after nine years of tension, a major war could have been avoided if the U.S. had engaged in negotiations over Russia's proposal for Ukraine's neutrality and NATO non-expansion. I urged the White House to pursue diplomacy to prevent war.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: You know that the so called journalists, some would say stenographers, are repeating this word unprovoked when it comes to Russia moving to save the ethnic Russians in the East. Do you just flinch every time you hear this phrase, unprovoked, which is used by Speaker 1: I don't flinch. I laugh, and I guess I do cringe a little bit because, first of all, this is a provoked war. 2nd, the word unprovoked is provoked, in the sense, that it is part of the talking points of all of these reporters. They wouldn't even come up with the same word, same exact word repeated endlessly were it not so phony. So this is a war that had many provocations. It was a war that could easily have been avoided. When I say many provocations, it goes back to the US plan to expand NATO to Ukraine and Georgia back to the 19 nineties does Big Brozinski contrary to promises that were made at the end of what we thought was the end of the Cold War, I should say. The unilateral US withdrawal from the ABM Treaty in 2002, the 78 days of bombing of Belgrade by the United States and its allies, in 1999 to break that country apart and install a NATO military base in Kosovo carved out from Serbia. The overthrow of Viktor Yanukovych in February 2014, where, Victoria Nuland, the Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs at the time was point person for this, and absolutely in collaboration on regime change. The absolute failure of the US, Germany, and France to abide by, defend, and insist on the implementation of the Minsk II agreements. Provoked, of course, it was provoked. Wars don't come out of nowhere, and anyone watching the history of this has seen these provocations all along and the point that I keep making is that at the end of 2021, this was already 9 years into conflict, which started with the overthrow of Yanukovych by the United States and right wing forces in Ukraine. 9 years later, the big war could have been avoided and the fighting could have stopped when Russia put on the table a revised US Russia security arrangement based on Ukraine's neutrality on the non enlargement of NATO. And I told the White House then, take it. Negotiate. Of course, there are Speaker 0: You phoned them up. Speaker 1: Agree, but negotiate. Speaker 0: I mean, did you speak to the state department? Speaker 1: I spoke to the White House, and, I said don't have a war over this. This is obviously avoidable.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/AUs2RaLUWY

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

'Putin didn't want the war' John Mearsheimer on Ukraine War in Ukraine is the Fault of US, British and NATO Expansion. We Believed That We Could Win The War.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Putin initially sought to avoid war and aimed for a diplomatic solution before February 24, 2022. After the conflict began, he engaged in negotiations with Ukraine, focusing on NATO expansion and seeking a neutral Ukraine, without intentions to annex further territory aside from Crimea. However, the U.S. and U.K. influenced Zelensky to abandon negotiations, believing Ukraine and the West could win the war. Initially, this seemed plausible in 2022, but by 2023, the situation has shifted, indicating a challenging year for Ukraine and a potential advantage for Russia in the conflict.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Putin did not want this war. He went to great lengths before February 24th, 2022, when the war started to, head it off at the past. He wanted to come up with a diplomatic solution. And then shortly after the war broke out in February, he was negotiating with the Ukrainians, to work out a deal. And at that point in time he was not talking about incorporating any Ukrainian territory, safe for Crimea, which had already been annexed into Russia. And all he really cared about, it's quite clear from all the reports of the people who were involved in the discussions was NATO expansion into Ukraine. He wanted a neutral Ukraine and if he had gotten a neutral Ukraine, this is right after the war started, I believe there's a good chance the war could have been shut down. But it was the Americans and the British who moved in and basically told Zelensky that he had to walk away from the negotiations because we believed that we could win the war. We meaning Ukraine plus the West. And in 2022, it actually looked like that might be the case. But now it's quite clear that 2023 has been a disastrous year for the Ukrainians and if anything, the Russians will win the war.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/3Hun2JY8qL

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

EXACTLY 100% UK politician Farage says Russia's invasion of Ukraine was provoked by EU and NATO expansion Reform UK party leader Nigel Farage said on Friday that he believed Russia’s invasion of Ukraine was "provoked" by the eastward expansions of the European Union and NATO.

Video Transcript AI Summary

In 2014, I predicted a war in Ukraine due to NATO and EU expansion, which I believed provoked Russia. I've been warning about this since the 1990s, and I was criticized for it. Recently, George Robertson, a former NATO secretary general, echoed this sentiment, stating that EU expansion directly contributed to the conflict. Regarding Brexit, two main expectations were controlling our borders and reducing immigration, yet numbers have surged due to a conservative government prioritizing cheap labor. Additionally, Rishi Sunak's promise to eliminate 4,000 EU laws was abandoned, hindering regulatory simplification.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I stood up in the European Parliament in 2014, and I said, and I quote, there will be a war in Ukraine. Why did I say that? It was obvious to me that the ever eastward expansion of NATO and the European Union was giving this man a reason to his Russian people to say they're coming for us again and to go to war. But you were echoing him. I was sorry. You were echoing him. That's what Putin said. No. No. No. No. Sorry. I've been saying this actually since, actually, since 19 nineties. Ever since ever since Yeah. So he war. But hang on a second. We provoke this war. It's you know, of course, it's his fault. He's used what the government used to the invasion of Ukraine. And very interestingly, once again, 10 years ago when I predicted this by the way, I'm the only person in British politics that predicted what would happen. And, of course, everyone said I was a pariah for daring to suggest it. George Robertson, former labor cabinet minister, who went on to become the secretary general of NATO, has in the last couple of weeks said the war is a direct result of EU expansion But I'm asking you about because in your judgment, you wanna be prime minister. So let me ask you about someone else's view. My judgment has been way ahead of everybody else's in understanding this. My point is this. There were two realistic expectations from Brexit. One, we control our borders and reduce the numbers coming in. They've exploded. They've trebled to to numbers you can't even believe. And secondly and that's because of a conservative government that didn't even try because their big backers want cheap foreign labor. With the economy for the moment. And yeah. And secondly, it was a realistic expectation. Indeed, when Rishi Sunak was became prime minister, he was gonna scrap 4,000 EU laws. He then binned that policy. So we've not seen the simplification of regulation. Yeah.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/sqevUOVKX4

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

US Presidential Candidate @RobertKennedyJr Robert F. Kennedy Jr: We had the opportunity twice to settle this war on terms that were very, very good for the american people. Putin really wanted was us to keep NATO pledged and not put NATO into Ukraine, which is a legitimate demand by him. President Biden sent Boris Johnson over there to force Zelensky to tear up the treaty. 📑We had the opportunity twice to settle this war on terms that were very, very good for the american people. In April of 2022, President Putin and President Zelensky signed an agreement that was refereed by Naftali Bennett, the prime minister of Israel and also the prime minister of Turkey. It was a great agreement. All Putin really wanted was us to keep NATO pledged and not put NATO into Ukraine, which is a legitimate demand by him. He was withdrawing his troops after initialling that treaty. And President Biden sent Boris Johnson over there to force Zelensky to tear up the treaty. Since then, 600,000 ukrainian kids have died for a reason they never, nobody should have died. And we're now on the brink of closer to nuclear exchange.

Video Transcript AI Summary

In April 2022, an agreement was signed between President Putin and President Zelensky, facilitated by the leaders of Israel and Turkey. This agreement was favorable for the American people, primarily addressing Putin's demand to keep NATO out of Ukraine. Following the signing, Putin began withdrawing troops. However, President Biden intervened, sending Boris Johnson to pressure Zelensky into abandoning the treaty. As a result, the conflict escalated, leading to the tragic loss of 600,000 Ukrainian children and bringing the world closer to nuclear confrontation.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: We have the opportunity twice to settle this war in terms that were very, very good for the American people. In April of 2022, President Putin and President Zelensky signed an agreement that was refereed by Naftali Bennett, the prime minister of Israel and, and the prime also the prime minister of Turkey. It was a great agreement. All Putin really wanted was us to keep NATO pledged and not put NATO into Ukraine, which is a legitimate demand by him. The, he was withdrawing his troops after initialing that treaty and President Biden sent Boris Johnson over there to force Zelensky to tear up the treaty. Since then 600,000 Ukrainian kids have died for a reason they never nobody should have died. And we're now on the brink, closer to nuclear change

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/Jyvi3FlijI

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

U.S. uses NATO as 'war machine' to maintain global hegemony Pepe Escobar “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.” ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World

Video Transcript AI Summary

This conflict is primarily against Russia and aims to destabilize Europe. The neocons have sought to deindustrialize Europe and sever its economic ties with Russia, particularly targeting Germany, to make Europe subservient to their agenda. We are approaching a critical point where, if their efforts against Russia fail, they might resort to extreme measures, including limited nuclear options, similar to past interventions in Libya and Iraq. Historically, NATO has not succeeded in promoting peace or security, and past actions have led to significant destruction without achieving stability.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Against Russia, that's number 1. Number 2, it's a war against Europe because one of the objectives of the neocons who launched this war and who have been working to launch this war for at least 8 years is to deindustrialize Europe, cut off the economic ties between, especially Germany and the EU and Russia, and turn Europe as a whole into a vassal of the empire. We are reaching a very dangerous threshold, which is when they throw everything against Russia and it doesn't work, they will be sufficiently paranoid and crazy to try I would say this is the ultimate red line, a limited nuclear this is what they did to Libya. They destroyed a country because in their minds, they needed control over a very fertile and important part of Northern Africa. In Iraq in 2003, the Americans started and NATO continued. We all know what happened. There is not a single historical example of NATO promoting peace and security. History shows that to us.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/OM8d6m8bpR

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

David Sacks Brilliant Quotes The Ukraine - Russian War Was Provoked! Biden provoked — yes, provoked — the Russians to invade Ukraine with talk of NATO expansion. Afterward, he rejected every opportunity for peace in Ukraine, including a deal to end the war just two months after it broke out. Now the war is deep into its third year, with no end in sight. Hundreds of thousands of people are dead. Hundreds of billions of our taxpayer dollars have gone up in smoke. President Biden sold us this new Forever War by promising it would weaken Russia and strengthen America. Well, how does that look today? Russia's military is bigger than before, while our own stockpiles are dangerously depleted. 📑Good evening, America. I'm David Sacks, a legal immigrant who worked hard to achieve the American dream. (Thank you.) Now I'm concerned those same opportunities won't be there for future generations. As I look out at this convention, I see a party that is strong and unified behind President Donald J. Trump, and his pick for Vice President, Senator J.D. Vance. And what about the Democrats? They're in disarray after shielding President Biden from a vigorous primary and gaslighting the entire country about his fitness to serve. We still don't know which puppet Democrat Party bosses will install as their nominee, but we know what their agenda will be: four more years of chaos and failure, both at home and abroad. In my hometown of San Francisco, Democrat rule has turned the streets of our beautiful city into a cesspool of crime, homeless encampments, and open drug use. Democrats — led by Border Czar Kamala Harris — have allowed millions of illegal migrants to invade our country. They tasked Homeland Security not with stopping the illegal aliens, but with busing them all over our country. Democrats have recklessly spent trillions of dollars on wasteful and unnecessary government programs, setting off the worst inflation since Jimmy Carter. But worst of all, the Biden-Harris administration has taken a world that was at peace under President Trump, and they lit it on fire. First, President Biden botched the Afghanistan withdrawal, displaying incompetence and weakness for the whole world to see. Then, he provoked — yes, provoked — the Russians to invade Ukraine with talk of NATO expansion. Afterward, he rejected every opportunity for peace in Ukraine, including a deal to end the war just two months after it broke out. Now the war is deep into its third year, with no end in sight. Hundreds of thousands of people are dead. Hundreds of billions of our taxpayer dollars have gone up in smoke. President Biden sold us this new Forever War by promising it would weaken Russia and strengthen America. Well, how does that look today? Russia's military is bigger than before, while our own stockpiles are dangerously depleted. Every day, there are new calls for escalation, and the world looks on in horror as Joe Biden's demented policy takes us to the brink of World War III. In the Middle East, America is now losing a war with the Houthis. And the administration's policy towards Gaza has been so incoherent that the only thing that pro-Israel and pro-Palestine protesters agree on is the chant “eff Joe Biden.” Rather than bolstering confidence in American leadership, as he promised, President Biden has become the symbol of an America in decline. This may be our present, but it does not have to be our future. We can replace the Biden-Harris cabal with a president who is strong and smart rather than sleepy and senile, or in her case, clueless and embarrassing. A president who understands that you build the most powerful military in the world to keep America safe, not to play the world's policeman. A president who is willing to talk to adversaries, as well as friends, because that is the only way to make peace. A president who will stand up to the warmongers, instead of empowering them. My fellow Americans, we need a leader who commands respect and demands reciprocity from other nations. We need strength and savviness in the White House Situation Room — even if the crisis hits after Biden's bedtime. We need a president who can be president and lead, not a puppet controlled by his or her staff. We need order in our cities, order at our border, and order restored to a world on fire. My friends, we need President Donald J. Trump back in the White House. Thank you.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Good evening, America. I'm David Sachs, a legal immigrant concerned about the future of our opportunities. I see a strong Republican party united behind President Trump and Senator JD Vance, while the Democrats are in chaos, failing to address President Biden's fitness for office. Under Democrat rule, cities like San Francisco suffer from crime and homelessness, and the Biden administration has mishandled immigration and economic policies, leading to inflation and international instability. Biden's foreign policy has been disastrous, from the Afghanistan withdrawal to escalating tensions in Ukraine and the Middle East. We need a strong leader who prioritizes American safety, engages with adversaries, and restores order at home and abroad. It's time to bring President Trump back to the White House. Thank you.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Good evening, America. I'm David good evening, America. I'm David Sachs, a legal immigrant who worked hard to achieve the American dream. Now Thank you. Now, I'm concerned those same opportunities won't be there for future generations. As I look out at this convention, I see a party that is strong and unified behind president Donald j Trump and his pick for vice president, senator JD Vance. And what about the Democrats? They're in disarray after shielding president Biden from a vigorous primary and gaslighting the entire country about his fitness to serve. We still don't know which puppet Democrat party bosses will install as their nominee, but we know what their agenda will be. Four more years of chaos and failure, both at home and abroad. In my hometown of San Francisco, Democrat rule has turned the streets of our beautiful city into a cesspool of crime, homeless encampments, and open drug use. Democrats, led by border czar, Kamala Harris, have allowed millions of illegal migrants to invade our country. They tasked Homeland Security not with stopping the illegal aliens, but with busing them all over our country. Democrats have recklessly spent 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars of wasteful and unnecessary government programs, setting off the worst inflation since Jimmy Carter. But worst of all, the Biden Harris administration has taken a world that was at peace under President Trump, and they lit it on fire. First, President Biden botched the Afghanistan withdrawal, displaying incompetence and weakness for the whole world to see. Then, he provoked, yes, provoked the Russians to invade Ukraine with talk of NATO expansion. Afterward, he rejected every opportunity for peace in Ukraine, including a deal to end the war just 2 months after it broke out. Now the war is deep into its 3rd year with no end in sight. 100 of thousands of people are dead. 100 of 1,000,000,000 of our taxpayer dollars have gone up in smoke. President Biden sold us this new forever war by promising it would weaken Russia and strengthen America. Well, how does that look today? Russia's military is bigger than before, while our own stockpiles are dangerously depleted. Every day, there are new calls for escalation, and the world looks on in horror as Joe Biden's demented policy takes us to the brink of World War 3. In the Middle East, America is now losing a war with the Houthis, And the administration's policy towards Gaza has been so incoherent that the only thing that pro Israel and pro Palestine protesters agree on is the chant f Joe Biden. Rather than bolstering confidence in American leadership as he promised, president Biden has become the symbol of an America in decline. This may be our present, but it does not have to be our future. We can replace the Biden Harris cabal with a president who is strong and smart rather than sleepy and senile. Or in her case, clueless and embarrassing, A president who understands that you build the most powerful military in the world to keep America safe, not to play the world's policeman. A president who is willing to talk to adversaries as well as friends because that is the only way to make peace. A president who will stand up to the warmongers instead of empowering them. My fellow Americans, we need a leader who commands respect and demands reciprocity from other nations. We need strength and savviness in the White House situation room even if the crisis hits after Biden's bedtime. We need a president who can be president and lead, not a puppet controlled by his or her staff. We need order in our cities, order at our border, and order restored to a world on fire. My friends, we need president Donald J. Trump back in the White House. Thank you.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/lwApyCBuww

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Col Doug Macgregor: We Cultivated This Conflict, We Encouraged It The Russians Have Tried Everything They Possibly Could To Avoid A Confrontation With The West 📑And that's the problem we have in the west. The lie is this was an unprovoked invasion. That's absolutely false. You've had on Professor Mearsheimer and others that have talked at length about this. We cultivated this conflict, we encouraged it, and then ultimately we unleashed it. It was not the Russians who sought this confrontation with us at all. In fact, from the very beginning, the Russians have tried everything they possibly could to avoid a confrontation with the west. Putin has recently said that provided these f 16s go into Ukraine and fly from ukrainian bases, he absolutely under no circumstances will permit the attack of any basis inside the NATO alliance. He doesn't want a confrontation. We're the ones provoking it. But this man's position that he outlined is not sustainable. It cannot go on much longer.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The narrative in the West claims that the invasion was unprovoked, which is false. This conflict was cultivated and encouraged by us, not initiated by Russia. From the start, Russia has sought to avoid confrontation. Putin has stated that if F-16s are deployed from Ukrainian bases, he will not allow attacks on NATO bases, indicating he does not desire conflict. The current stance outlined is not sustainable and cannot continue for much longer.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: That's the problem we have in the West. The lie is this was an unprovoked invasion. That's absolutely false. You've had on Professor Mearsheimer and others that have talked at length about this. We cultivated this conflict. We encouraged it and then ultimately we unleashed it. It was not the Russians who sought this confrontation with us at all. In fact, for the very beginning, the Russians have tried everything they possibly could to avoid a confrontation with the West. Putin has recently said that provided, these f sixteens go into Ukraine and fly from Ukrainian bases, he absolutely under no circumstances will permit the attack of any bases inside the NATO alliance. He doesn't want a confrontation, we're the ones provoking it. But this man's position that he outlined is not sustainable, it cannot go on much longer.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/c6HRZqy1Pt

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Former US presidential candidate Stein: We had a proxy war in Ukraine that could have been avoided if we had simply respected the promise we made to Gorbachev when Germany reunited, and we said we would not move one mile to the east. And everyone knew that if we moved east, we would be attacking the Russian border. And it should be noted that what Russia is doing on the border is what we did when Russia brought its weapons to Cuba. Fortunately, our leaders talked. That is not happening now. They seem obsessed with using competition, using weapons, to show that “I am stronger than you.” And now we are climbing the ladder of escalation in both Ukraine and Israel.

Video Transcript AI Summary

In Ukraine, we are engaged in a proxy war that could have been avoided if we had honored the promise made to Gorbachev regarding NATO expansion. Moving eastward would infringe on Russia's borders, similar to their missile placement in Cuba. In the past, leaders communicated effectively to prevent escalation, but that seems lacking now. Instead, there is a focus on competition and military might, leading to increased tensions in both Ukraine and Israel.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: In Ukraine, where we are fighting a proxy war, which could have been avoided had we simply respected the promise that was made to Gorbachev at the time that Germany reunited, and we said we are not moving 1 inch to the east. And it was well known that if we did move 1 inch to the east, we were going to be treading on Russia's border. And I just wanna make the point that what Russia is doing around this border is exactly what we did when, Russia moved its missiles into Cuba. Fortunately, our leaders had the good sense to talk with each other. They don't seem to do that now. They seem hell bent on using basically competition, weapons, and showing that I'm tougher than you are. And we're now moving up this escalation ladder right now in both Ukraine and, in Israel.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/hrL1PMlISP

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Brilliant!!! The best video @0rf ‼️👏👏👏 Watch Matt Orfalea Bitch Slap Those Who Said The Ukraine Invasion Was "Not About NATO" The biggest threat in the world is NATO. NATO exists to solve the problems created by NATO’s existence. NATO is a military alliance that feeds on war. To justify its existence, NATO constantly needs an external enemies and conflicts. NATO DISBAND!

Video Transcript AI Summary

President Putin sent a draft treaty to NATO, demanding no further enlargement as a precondition to avoid invading Ukraine, which NATO rejected. The conflict is not about NATO expansion; it centers on democracy in Ukraine, where political parties are banned, and elections are not held. Putin's actions are driven by a desire to expand his influence, reminiscent of historical aggressors like Hitler. The war is framed as a struggle against tyranny, with comparisons drawn to past conflicts. Ultimately, the narrative emphasizes that NATO is not the real issue; rather, it is about resisting authoritarianism and protecting democratic values.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: President Putin actually sent a draft treaty that he wanted NATO to sign to promise no more NATO enlargement. That was what he sent us. And that was a precondition for not invade Ukraine. Of course, we didn't sign that. Speaker 1: So he went to war to prevent NATO, more NATO across his borders. Flashback. Speaker 0: This is fundamentally not about NATO expansion. Speaker 1: It's never about NATO enlargement. Speaker 2: It's not about NATO. It's not about NATO expanding toward Russia. Speaker 1: This was never about NATO? Speaker 2: It's absolutely nothing to do with NATO expansionism. And it has nothing to do with NATO. This is not about NATO. Speaker 1: It's not about NATO. It's not really about NATO. This is not about NATO. Speaker 2: Seriously, it's not about NATO. Speaker 1: This was never about NATO. Speaker 3: It was never about NATO. Let's be honest. This doesn't have anything to do with NATO? Speaker 1: Nothing to do with NATO at all. Speaker 2: Yeah. He's claiming it's, like, security purposes, but we can see the clear reason. But NATO is not the reason. Speaker 1: This is not about NATO expansion. This is about the democratic expansion. Ukraine bans religious organizations. We are protecting democracy right now. Ukraine is banning political parties. Because it's a democracy. Ukraine restricts books and music. It's about democracy. Ukraine won't hold elections. It's about democracy. And it's not about NATO expansion. Speaker 2: This war Speaker 1: in Ukraine is not about NATO. Speaker 2: It's not about NATO. It's not about NATO. It has nothing to do with NATO. Nothing to do with NATO expansion. Speaker 1: It's not about Speaker 3: NATO expansion. Speaker 1: Nothing to do with with NATO. Speaker 2: It isn't really about NATO. Speaker 1: It's not about NATO. It's not about NATO enlargement. In fact, it has nothing to do with NATO. Speaker 2: It's not about NATO encroaching. Speaker 1: So it's not about NATO. NATO is just as a fictitious imaginary adversary for Speaker 2: for for mister Putin and for Russia. Speaker 1: It was never about NATO. Speaker 3: That's not what it's been about. It's been about him trying to expand his sphere of influence. Speaker 4: Hang on. I mean, the 2 are not mutually exclusive. Obviously, Russia has wished for a sphere of influence over Ukraine. But if the west had not challenged Russian interests so directly, I think that there there was a chance to avoid this war. Speaker 2: He wanted us to sign Speaker 0: a promise never to enlarge NATO. We rejected that. Speaker 2: The reason why Putin invaded Ukraine is because of his evil Evil. It's about that Putin wants to rebuild Soviet empire of evil like president Reagan told. Speaker 1: It's about Putin being sick. Because I don't Speaker 2: know how you negotiate peace with a madman, but nobody negotiated with Hitler. Speaker 1: People were comparing him to Hitler. To Hitler. And remember Hitler? Speaker 2: He's a Hitler. Speaker 1: We're back when the the Nazis invaded Poland. Speaker 2: This is exactly the same what Hitler was doing to choose. This is the same. Putin will not stop. Speaker 4: Putin Speaker 1: Putin is reminiscent of Hitler. Hitler. Speaker 2: This reminds me of Hitler. Hitler. Hitler. Speaker 4: He's the new Hitler. Speaker 1: Who Hitler? This is about a butcher trying to kill people everywhere in the world, just not Ukraine, Syria, all over the place. I hear you. Senator Lindsey Graham, always great to talk to you. Thanks so much. Thank you. Alright. Straight ahead.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/g6rSuqrvcj

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

The war has always been between the US and Russia In 2016, Victoria Nuland told Congress that US advisors serve in 12 Ukrainian ministries, US-trained police operate in 18 Ukrainian cities, the US Treasury helped close 60 Ukrainian banks, and the US spent $266 million on training Ukrainian soldiers.

Video Transcript AI Summary

US advisers are actively supporting nearly a dozen Ukrainian ministries, focusing on service delivery, fraud reduction, tax collection, and institutional modernization. Newly trained police officers are now patrolling 18 cities. Free legal aid attorneys, funded by the US, have achieved two-thirds of all acquittals in Ukraine's courts. US Treasury and State Department advisers have assisted in closing over 60 failed banks, safeguarding depositor assets. Recognizing the link between reform and security, the US has invested over $266 million in the security sector, training 1,200 soldiers and 750 National Guard personnel, and providing essential gear. In FY16, this support will continue with further training and equipment for Ukraine's border guards, military, and coast guard.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: And US advisers serve in almost a dozen Ukrainian ministries and localities, helping to deliver services, eliminate fraud and abuse, improve tax collection, and modernize Ukrainian institutions. With US help, newly vetted and trained police officers are patrolling the cities, the streets of 18 Ukrainian cities. In courtrooms across Ukraine, free legal aid attorneys funded by the US have won 2 thirds of all the acquittals in the countries. Treasury and state department advisers have helped Ukraine shutter over 60 failed banks and protected the assets of depositors. And since there can be no reform in Ukraine without security, over $266,000,000 of our support has been in the security sector, training 1200 soldiers and 750 Ukrainian National Guard personnel and supplying lifesaving gear. In FY16, we are continuing that training and equipment of more of Ukraine's border guards, military, and coast guard.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/jr1YYsZX1u

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

This guy knew. NATO expansion! https://t.co/hbdSij54Mz

@BowesChay — Chay Bowes

Posted - September 4, 2024 at 10:58 AM

Saved - September 4, 2024 at 1:00 PM

@BowesChay - Chay Bowes

The fact Boris Johnston is seen as a "Hero" in Dictator Zelenskys Kiev says a lot about the Ukrainian Cabal and their "partners" Johnston is a serial liar, fake, fraud, and explotative megalomaniac. (In good company with Zelensky) Here's the proof. https://t.co/xx310AJkH9

@ivan_8848 — Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Posted - September 4, 2024 at 11:03 AM

Saved - September 4, 2024 at 1:24 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I pulled off a full prank with Boris Johnson, the former UK Prime Minister. He thought he was speaking to Jacques Attali, a figure he respects. Johnson, who pushed Kyiv to fight, was misled into believing a legend about Kissinger calling him "a good housekeeper Kuzya."

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

FULL Prank with Boris Johnson Vovan & Lexus: The antihero of our new prank is Boris Johnson, ex-Prime Minister of Great Britain, ex-Minister of Foreign Affairs. This man, who literally forced Kyiv to fight to the last Ukrainian, disrupting peace talks, agreed to talk to us on behalf of Jacques Attali, respected in globalist circles, believing in the legend that Henry Kissinger himself confessed to Attali before his death and affectionately called Johnson "a good housekeeper Kuzya."

@KimDotcom — Kim Dotcom

Posted - September 9, 2024 at 4:36 AM

Saved - September 9, 2024 at 2:00 PM

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

Look at this mass murdering demon Victoria Nuland laughing in the face of all Ukrainians while admitting that she killed a peace deal with Russia that would have prevented over a million dead and given Ukraine most of its territory back. The last person she sees may be Ukrainian.

@I_Katchanovski - Ivan Katchanovski

Wow! Nuland basically admits that Ukraine-Russia peace deal, which was close to being finalized in spring 2022, “fell apart” because US, UK & other Western governments “advised” Zelensky government that it was not “good deal” even though even members of Ukrainian delegation stated in recent interviews that this was very good deal, best deal that Ukraine could get & “very real compromise” & that Ukrainian delegation celebrated it with champagne. She basically confirms statements by ex-Israeli PM, head of Ukrainian delegation, Ukrainian officials close to Zelensky, ex-German chancellor & Turkish FM that US & UK blocked this peace deal, which was close to being finalized. Victoria Nuland does not mention at all Russian war crimes in Bucha, which were inflated & mispresented by politicians, media & self-proclaimed experts as reason for ending peace talks. The peace deal agreement included withdrawal of Russian forces from all territory of Ukraine, with exceptions of Donbas & Crimea, whose status was to be determined at meeting of Putin & Zelensky, in exchange for neutral status & demilitarization of Ukraine. https://youtu.be/HiS2dg_atfc?si=4L5Aqe0GEbKoQAFu&t=3192

Video Transcript AI Summary

Naftali Bennett said that Boris Johnson interfered and prevented Ukrainians from signing a deal at the end of negotiations. Ukrainian representative Karakami confirmed that Johnson advised stopping negotiations to win the war militarily. According to Speaker 1, the Ukrainians began asking for advice and it became clear that Putin's main condition was in an annex. This condition included limits on the weapons systems Ukraine could have, which would have neutralized them as a military force. Russia would not have similar constraints, such as pulling back or having a buffer zone. People inside and outside Ukraine questioned whether it was a good deal, and that's when it fell apart.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: There was a story first told by former Israeli prime minister, Naftali Bennett, that that both sides were really close to the end to the the successful end of the of the new negotiations and then prime minister Boris Johnson interfered and stopped Ukrainians, prevented Ukrainians from from signing the deal. And then, Ukrainian representative Karakami kind of confirmed that that yes. He said in a in an interview that that there was some kind of advice from Boris Johnson to, to stop negotiating and to win this war militarily. Where is the myth? Where where is the truth? Speaker 1: Relatively late in the game, the Ukrainians began asking for advice, on where this thing was going. And it became clear to us, clear to the Brits, clear to others, that Putin's main condition was buried in an annex, to this document that they were working on. Mhmm. And it included limits on the precise kinds of weapons systems that Ukraine could have after the deal. Such that Ukraine would basically be neutered as a military force. And there were no similar constraints on Russia. Russia wasn't required to pull back. Russia wasn't wasn't required to have a buffer zone from the Ukrainian border. It wasn't required to have the same constraints on its military facing Ukraine. And so, people inside Ukraine and people outside Ukraine started asking questions about whether this was a good deal, and it was at that point that it that it fell apart.

@KanekoaTheGreat — KanekoaTheGreat

Posted - October 11, 2024 at 1:26 AM

Saved - October 11, 2024 at 12:14 PM

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

Boris Johnson says Putin wouldn't have invaded Ukraine if Trump were president “I happen to believe that when Donald Trump says that had he been President, there would have been no Russian invasion of Ukraine. My view is that is a credible assertion.” https://t.co/fgH3FHD0Bp

Video Transcript AI Summary

Donald Trump claims that if he were president in 2022, there would have been no Russian invasion of Ukraine. The speaker believes this is a credible assertion.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Mean, look, I happen to believe that when Donald Trump says that had he been president in 2022, there would have been no Russian invasion of Ukraine. My view is that that is a credible assertion. Okay. I really do think that's credible.

@JimFergusonUK — Jim Ferguson

Posted - February 19, 2025 at 5:41 PM

Saved - February 20, 2025 at 1:08 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I just learned from Robert F. Kennedy Jr. that Biden allegedly blocked a peace deal in Ukraine back in April 2022. He claims Biden sent Boris Johnson to pressure Zelensky into abandoning an already agreed-upon deal with Russia. This raises serious questions about the motives behind the war—suggesting that Biden and NATO preferred conflict over peace. The narrative implies that the ongoing flow of weapons and financial support was aimed at regime change in Russia, rather than defending democracy. How many more revelations will it take for people to see the truth?

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

🚨 RFK JR. DROPS BOMBSHELL—BIDEN BLOCKED UKRAINE PEACE DEAL IN 2022! 🚨 🔴 Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has just EXPOSED the truth about the war in Ukraine: The conflict could have ended in April 2022, but Biden STOPPED IT! 🔴 According to RFK Jr., Joe Biden sent Boris Johnson to Ukraine to FORCE Zelensky to tear up a peace deal that had ALREADY been agreed upon with Russia. 🔥 Think about that—peace was within reach, but the war machine needed it to continue! 🔥 📢 WHAT THIS MEANS: ⚠️ Biden and NATO wanted war, not peace. ⚠️ The endless flow of weapons and billions in taxpayer money was ALWAYS the goal. ⚠️ Millions of lives have been destroyed because Washington wanted regime change in Russia! 💥 How many MORE revelations need to come out before people realize this war was NEVER about “defending democracy”?! 💥 🚨 Will Biden and his war-hungry globalists be held accountable for prolonging this war? 🚨

Video Transcript AI Summary

In April 2022, Biden dispatched Johnson to Ukraine to pressure Zelensky into abandoning a peace agreement with Russia. This agreement, which would have kept Donbas and Lugansk within Ukraine, was reached as Russia began withdrawing troops. Simultaneously, Biden declared his aim was regime change in Russia, while Defense Secretary Austin stated the U.S. sought to exhaust the Russian army. These objectives diverge significantly from the stated goal of protecting Ukraine's sovereignty.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: In April 2022, president Biden sent Boris Johnson to Ukraine to force president Zelensky to tear up a peace agreement that he and the Russians had already signed, and the Russians were withdrawing troops on Kyiv and Donbas and Lugansk. And that peace agreement would have brought peace to the region and would have allowed Donbas and Lugansk to remain part of Ukraine. President Biden stated that month that this object that his objective in the war was regime change in Russia. His defense secretary Lloyd Austin simultaneously explained that America's purpose in the war was to exhaust the Russian army to degrade its capacity to fight anywhere else in the world. These objectives, of course, have nothing to do with what they were telling Americans about protecting Ukraine's sovereignty.

@CilComLFC — Cillian

Posted - February 26, 2025 at 10:23 PM

Saved - February 28, 2025 at 9:17 PM

@CilComLFC - Cillian

🇷🇺 WOW! Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov goes NUCLEAR: “In April 2022, we were hours away from signing a full peace deal, but Boris Johnson STOPPED Ukraine. Ukraine was ready to sign, but they were forbidden by London and Washington.” Millions of people died for NOTHING. https://t.co/Fwd7cilkce

Video Transcript AI Summary

I have said many times that in Istanbul three years ago, we were very close to signing a full agreement. However, Boris Johnson prevented Ukraine from signing it. A Ukrainian official confirmed in an interview that they were ready to sign three years ago, but London and Washington forbade them from doing so.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Vladimir Putin, president of the Russian Federation, has said that many times, reminding in Istanbul, Three Years ago, we were maybe one hour away from signing a full scale agreement. But Boris Johnson banned Ukraine from doing that. And in an interview, the Ukrainian official publicly confirmed this fact that three years ago they had been ready to sign, but they they were forbidden to do that By London and Washington.

@ReadeAlexandra — Tara Reade 🐎

Posted - March 6, 2025 at 11:32 AM

Saved - March 6, 2025 at 7:19 PM

@ReadeAlexandra - Tara Reade 🐎

These absolute evil war mongers in Europe will not stop propping up the Kiev regime and undermining peace! You are watching the globalist cabal in action.

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🔴LIVE: ZELENSKYY JOINS EUROPEAN LEADERS FOR EMERGENCY UKRAINE TALKS https://t.co/9hpnu00odR

@amuse — @amuse

Posted - April 6, 2025 at 5:34 PM

Saved - April 7, 2025 at 5:18 AM

@amuse - @amuse

UKRAINE: The US has pumped billions into Ukraine over the past three years and Zelensky is paying us back by lying to our faces over and over. We expect Putin to lie to us but we deserve more from Zelensky. Ukraine needs a honest broker to end the war - Zelensky is not one.

Video Transcript AI Summary

President Zelensky was initially willing to sign a deal, but delayed it, even after being urged to do so in person at the White House. An agreement was prepared for signing, but Zelensky never signed it. An unelected president of a client state, whose bureaucrats' retirement accounts are funded by American taxpayers, has a retirement age of 60, while France is 62 and Italy is 67. Zelensky, a performer and ordinary person, rose to the occasion heroically but is now stuck and under pressure. Some of his government officials are good, but he's not getting the best advice. The proposed agreement ensures money benefits both American and Ukrainian people, unlike rapacious Chinese deals or loans to own. It's a genuine economic partnership where both parties profit. This agreement regulates the flow of money, which is why some people don't like it.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: President Zelensky was in the mood to sign the deal that day. We had a spirited discussion, and, I said to him, you've got 50 reporters out there. I am here to show that there is no daylight between the American people, the Russian people, between, excuse me, Ukrainian people, between the American leadership and Ukrainian leadership. And I said, you've opened up daylight the size of the Grand Canyon. What are we gonna go out and tell those people? He said, tell them I'm gonna sign the deal in Munich. I said, so you're gonna sign the deal when you see vice president Vance and secretary of state Rubio in Munich? Yes. He didn't sign it there. There's a lot of back and forth the following week. They're begging to come to the White House and should make him sign the deal before he comes. And then he got to the Oval Office and blew up what should have been the easiest thing to do in the world. He was supposed to show up, have a press conference, we were going to have a private lunch. If he had anything on his mind, there were going to be nine of us, nine of them in the White House Dining Room. He could have aired his grievances then. And there's a famous photo in the East Wing Ballroom of everything laid out on the table to be signed, and it never got signed. Speaker 1: So this is an unelected president of a client state whose bureaucrats are being paid directly by American taxpayers including their retirement accounts are funded by us. Speaker 0: And they have the lowest retirement age in Europe. It's 60. Put it in contrast, France is 62 and Italy Sixty Seven. Speaker 1: And we're paying for that. And so at a certain point, you know, you wouldn't expect a man like that in a highly precarious position. I think it's it's fair to say to, like, assume a high handed tone with American officials and berate them and sniff a lot and say, you know, basically acting like a crazy person. Like, how do you account for that? The arrogance. What is that? Speaker 0: Look, a couple of things. He was a performer. Kind of a vaudevillian, And he was an ordinary person thrown into a fraught time, rose to the occasion. Yes. Was heroic. Yes. And I think is stuck. And I think under a tremendous amount of pressure. I think that some of the government officials around him in the cabinet are very good. I think some of the people around him, he's not getting the best advice, that his advisers are not perfect. And I think if we go back to the agreement, I think one of the great things about the agreement is it makes sure that the money comes to the American people and the Ukrainian people. Tucker, let me tell you what the agreement wasn't. It wasn't one of these rapacious Chinese deals where it's sign over your mind, sign over your port, or it wasn't a loan to own. Here's the loan. You're never going be able to pay it back. We're going get this. It's a genuine economic partnership that they put in assets. We can put in loans from our overseas banks. We put in American know how, and we don't make any money unless they make money. You know who doesn't like that? People with their hand in their till. Right. Right. Because we were regulating the flow of the money. Ah. So, I think that's part of the glitch.

@ricwe123 — Richard

Posted - September 8, 2025 at 4:10 PM

Saved - September 9, 2025 at 11:51 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I reflect on the Bucharest Summit in 2008, where George W. Bush praised Ukraine for its support of NATO's actions in Afghanistan and Iraq. He then announced his full support for Ukraine joining NATO, claiming it was about advancing security and freedom. However, I see this as a moment that set off a chain of destruction, leading to a generation of Ukrainians being caught in a conflict fueled by deception and manipulation from the West.

@ricwe123 - Richard

The moment Ukraine’s fate was doomed. Bucharest Summit,2008, George W. Bush grinning as he praises Ukraine for backing NATO’s bloody adventures in Afghanistan and Iraq. Then he drops the bomb: full-throated support for Ukraine joining NATO. "Helping advance security and freedom," he says, completely blind to the chaos he’s unleashing. Let's be clear, this dumb motherfucker triggered a chain of destruction that condemned a generation of brainwashed Ukrainians to die for a carefully fabricated bullshit lie, manufactured and sold by Western deception.

Video Transcript AI Summary

So we spent a lot of time talking about NATO. First, I do wanna remind people that Ukraine and the NATO alliance have built a strong partnership. Ukraine is the only non NATO nation supporting every NATO mission. In Afghanistan and Iraq, Ukrainian troops are helping to support young democracies. In Kosovo, Ukrainians are help keep the peace. Ukraine now seeks to deepen its cooperation with the NATO alliance through a membership action plan. Your nation has made a bold decision, and The United States strongly supports your request. In Bucharest this week, I will continue to make America's position clear. We support MAP for Ukraine and Georgia. Helping Ukraine move toward NATO membership is in the interest of every member in the alliance and will help advance security and freedom in this region and around the world.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So we spent a lot of time talking about NATO. First, I do wanna remind people that Ukraine and the NATO alliance have built a strong partnership. Ukraine is the only non NATO nation supporting every NATO mission. In Afghanistan and Iraq, Ukrainian troops are helping to support young democracies. In Kosovo, Ukrainians are help keep the peace. Ukraine now seeks to deepen its cooperation with the NATO alliance through a membership action plan. Your nation has made a bold decision, and The United States strongly supports your request. In Bucharest this week, I will continue to make America's position clear. We support MAP for Ukraine and Georgia. Helping Ukraine move toward NATO membership is in the interest of every member in the alliance and will help advance security and freedom in this region and around the world.

@patricksavalle — Patrick Savalle

Posted - October 13, 2025 at 2:38 PM

Saved - October 13, 2025 at 8:13 PM

@patricksavalle - Patrick Savalle

Waarom saboteerde Boris Johnson persoonlijk het op tafel liggende vredesakkoord tussen Oekraïne en Rusland? Geld! https://t.co/9Gpmm45W8T

Video Transcript AI Summary

The transcript argues Boris Johnson played a pivotal, controversial role in Ukraine's war stance, with Zelensky ally David Arachamia confirming Johnson's involvement in blocking a peaceful settlement. It alleges that after leaving office, Johnson received a record donation—£1,000,000—from Christopher Harbourn, a “reclusive billionaire” whose holdings include crypto, wellness, jet fuel, and military contractors, and who is the largest shareholder in a British weapons maker supplying drones and robots. The donors accompanied Johnson to Kyiv on Harbourn's jet to advocate for more war and for delaying Ukraine's NATO membership, a stance described as contributing to “the worst war in Europe for eighty years.” The donation is said to enable Johnson to stay active in mainstream UK politics, while opponents are accused of Moscow-driven dirty tricks, and a claim that “everything is for sale” in Zelensky's Ukraine and London.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: When it comes to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, there's one name that's impossible to ignore, and that is Boris Johnson, the famous scandal riven ex British PM who notoriously stepped in to prevent a peaceful settlement shortly after the war began. A fact confirmed by Zelensky's political ally and chief negotiator, David Arachamia. Speaker 1: They are ready to end the war if we accepted neutrality like Finland once did, and we would have to make a commitment to not join NATO. When we returned from Istanbul, Boris Johnson came to Kyiv and told us we will not sign anything with them at all, and we'll just keep fighting. Speaker 0: Now over a million unnecessary deaths later, British newspaper, The Guardian, has published an investigation based on leaked documents from Johnson's office. Now according to them, just after losing the position of prime minister, Johnson received the biggest donation ever received by a British politician, an eye watering £1,000,000. The donor, a reclusive billionaire, Christopher Harbourn. So who exactly is mister Harbourn? Speaker 2: Harbourn has wide expertise, a self described digital nomad. His holdings range from cryptocurrency and a wellness center to jet fuel and stakes in at least three military contractors. His only apparent connection to Ukraine is as the biggest shareholder in a British weapons manufacturer whose robots and drones are reportedly supplied to its armed forces. Speaker 0: And Harbourn's not just any old spa and Bitcoin enthusiast who just so happened to invest in drones. Here he is sitting right next to his pal Boris in Ukraine during one of Johnson's several visits to Kyiv. Apparently, they arrived there after flying in on Harbourn's jet to Poland from where they took the train to Ukraine. Now by that time Boris was no longer prime minister and had already pocketed the £1,000,000 from his drone selling pal. So what exactly was the purpose of the visit? Well, politically, it was obviously to argue for more war. Speaker 3: We tried not having Ukraine in NATO. It's led to the worst war in Europe for eighty years. Hundreds of thousands of people dead. It's a disaster. The only answer is to get Ukraine in NATO. Speaker 0: Considering that the whole conflict began particularly due to Ukraine's western backed push for NATO membership, surely suggesting they accelerate those efforts was like trying to put out a fire with a can of gasoline. Yet apparently, these are exactly the genius political insights Christopher Harbourn was so enamored with. And according to his lawyers, that's exactly why he made such a massive donation to Boris Johnson. Speaker 4: Mister Harbourn's donation was given to enable mister Johnson to stay actively engaged in mainstream UK politics. It is and was a donation, and its reporting as such is appropriate. Mister Harbourn had and has no expectation of personal gain whatsoever. Any suggestion otherwise is completely without evidence and materially and knowingly false. Speaker 0: Now while the origin of the files is unknown, Boris himself is determined to make out that this is all dirty tricks from Moscow. Speaker 5: Your pathetic nonstories seem mostly to be derived from some illegal Russian hack job. You should be ashamed of yourselves. Speaker 0: So as Boris the Butcher continues to cash in on the meat grinder, it seems his billionaire political donors are also keen to profit from the chaos in Kyiv. And while a million pounds might seem like small change to buy access to Ukraine's corrupt weapons market, It's just another reminder of how everything is for sale in Zelensky's Ukraine. And everything is apparently also for sale in London too.

@patricksavalle - Patrick Savalle

Boris Johnson heeft destijds persoonlijk het in Turkije bereikte vredesakkoord tussen Rusland en Oekraïne gesaboteerd. De ex-PM van Israel, Bennett, legde in een interview uit hoe de onderhandelingen tussen Rusland en Oekraïne gingen. Hij was de centrale spil. Putin wilde een vredesakkoord en beloofde Zelenskyy niet te vermoorden. Putin beloofde af te zien van bezetting van Donbass en akkoord te gaan met beperkte demilitarisatie. Zelenskyy ging ook akkoord. Zelenskyy had daarnaast ook beloofd van NATO-lidmaatschap af te zien. In principe was alles rond. Dat was in april 2022, toen de Russische troepen in de voorsteden van Kiev stonden. Als teken van good will trok Putin de troepen terug. Zie https://t.co/zb5LO2wX6e Johnson vloog naar Oekraïne en verbood Zelenskyy te tekenen. Oekraïne viel alsnog de terugtrekkende Russische troepen aan en direct daarna gebeurde de Bucha false flag. Daarna was niets meer bespreekbaar. Vrede was mogelijk maar het Westen ging er voor liggen. Niet Rusland.

@EdwardMDruce - Edward M. Druce

Naftali Bennett’s remarkable tale of mediating between Zelensky and Putin (March 2022) – now with English voiceover. (As discussed between Prof. Mearsheimer and @lexfridman.) Why has this never been covered in Western press? Cc: @naftalibennett, @AXChristoforou, @DavidSacks,

Video Transcript AI Summary

BB recounts forming a relationship in Sochi as Ukraine tensions rose, prioritizing Israel's interests and evacuation of Israelis: "do you want to get the Israelis out or the Jews? The Israelis at this point." Facing two-sided pressure—America backing Ukraine and Russia threatening Israel's interests—he chose to mediate: "When I'm pressured on two sides, I take a third, and the third was creating contact with both sides and trying to mediate." He informed Putin of humanitarian aid and a field hospital in Lvov: "If you give me your word that it won't be used for military purposes... then no problem." He said, "I have Putin's ear. I can be a pipeline." Putin "renounced the denotification" and Zelensky "renounced joining NATO"; Zelensky later renounced NATO. He proposed the Israeli model: "We don't have guarantees from anyone. If someone invades us tomorrow, nobody has assured us and no one will come to save us." The process, including the "Kafkrana affair," involved Moscow, Berlin, Washington coordination; the ceasefire did not materialize, but diplomacy shaped ten months of policy and the field hospital effort.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So we formed a relationship in Sochi. We talked on the phone about all kinds of matters. But meanwhile, things in Ukraine were starting to heat up. January. I'm not too preoccupied with it at the time. I'm not familiar with the map and Ukraine. Not a major issue to me. I'm overseas. I don't remember if it was Bahrain or The Emirates, and the Americans are saying that war is imminent. There's a debate whether or not to invade. So what I focus on is getting Israelis out as quickly as possible. I think it was on the twenty fourth. From Ukraine? Yes, because I'll tell you something in general. When it comes to the world, foreign policy and all that, my focus is on Israel's interests. That may be a narrow view but my primary focus is on your people, my people. Soon the strategy will come to light in this regard. The war breaks out. Do you want to get the Israelis out or the Jews? The Israelis at this point. Okay. And based on the policy, are you thinking that this is war? They're going in and the entire world thinks that this invasion will be a piece of cake. There's not that much talk of conquering Ukraine, more of defeating Ukraine. Everyone knows that is finished. America suggests Zelensky seek refuge with them. This is public information. I started studying the topic. When a new topic comes up, I want to understand what the strategy of each side can be. But the world fully understands there's no competition in this regard. The war breaks out and I'm instantly between a rock and a hard place. On the one hand, the Americans clearly expect this is largely led by the Americans that we all rally for Ukraine. On the other hand, I have two opposing interests. One is our routine activity in Syria. Once or twice a week, we attack the Iranian presence in Syria. And Russia, the superpower, has S-three 100 there. If they press the button, Israeli pilots will fall. Who will save them? Who will rescue their next Ron Arad? Biden? Zelensky? It'll be my problem. So all the talk of being on the right side of history, I get it, but I have a national need. Second, there are many Jews in Ukraine and Russia. And as a prime minister of the Jewish state, I have a responsibility. So what do I do? I came up with a strategy that says When I'm pressured on two sides, I take a third, and the third was creating contact with both sides and trying to mediate. I knew that the trust I had formed with Putin was a rare commodity. America didn't know how to communicate at the time, neither does it know today. I don't think there was anyone else who had the trust of both sides. Maybe Erdogan to a degree. That's one thing. The second thing, I set a rule, a lot of humanitarian aid, but no supply of weapons. I informed Putin of whatever I did. I told Putin, I'm setting up a field hospital in Lvov. In a phone call? Yes. I just want to let you know. So he said, If you give me your word that it won't be a hiding place for weapons or soldiers, that it won't be used for military purposes, then no problem. Just tell me where it is. I'll ensure it's not bombed. This was before the meeting. I think so. How do you experience him in phone calls? Very matter of fact. There are two very different narratives. He has one narrative and perception. Zelenskyy and the West have another. The West sees Putin as an imperialist who wants to take over more places, once Georgia, once here, once there. And if we don't stop him in Ukraine, he'll go on to Poland and the Baltics. Putin's perception was, as early as the meeting on Sochi, even more so here, wait, when the war came down, we reached an agreement with NATO that they wouldn't expand NATO and would not touch the belt countries that envelop Russia. Don't bring me NATO, my enemy or rival. And why are you introducing Ukraine to NATO? Yes. The story goes much deeper. You know, the Americans, on a side note, the Americans have a centuries old doctrine called the Manoe Doctrine, whereby the hegemony over the Western Hemisphere, North And South America, belongs to The USA. As early as two hundred years ago, they didn't want France and Britain there. Don't come here. And to a degree, that's Putin's perception. Don't come here. This is my backyard. I don't presume to judge the perceptions. What I care about is Israel's national interests. I knew that if I don't take some other action, I'll be forced to supply weapons and I'm endangering the Jews. And so I called the Americans, Lincoln, Biden, and Sullivan, the national security adviser, and said, I have Putin's ear. I can be a pipeline. Zelenskyy initiated the request to contact Putin. Zelenskyy called me and asked me to contact Putin. I have the protocol. What for? To help. As the war is going on, yes, and he was in distress. Keep in mind, he knows that his days are numbered and that he'll be killed. It wasn't hard to kill him. The Russians had demands. One was denotification, meaning replacement of the leader. And I assume the world understood that this means killing him. There was a disarmament emptying Ukraine out of weapons and army. There was five to six demands at first, so Zelenskyy calls you. Can you help me? At the time, I was meeting with Scholz, the new chancellor of Germany who replaced Angela Merkel. They're both excellent and very different. Scholz is a man of few words. Not that Angela was a big talker but he You're meeting him in Germany? No, in Jerusalem. Oh, right. So we have the first meeting, and he's very distressed because there's the gas issue. He fears for Germany's energy and the ramifications. I tell him about my discussions with Putin, and and Putin says we can reach a ceasefire. So I start talks back and forth. Putin, Zelensky, Zelensky, Putin, on the phone, yes. What happens in these phone calls? What's your suggestion? What happens is this. Draft sex changed not only through us directly as well. They're in Belarus in a city called Gomo. There are two negotiation teams, Russia and Ukraine, that the world looked down on, but I considered it a good thing that they were talking and exchanging, and I try to find solutions. I'm very skilled at negotiations. From my corporate life and politics and I couldn't procure deals. Moreover, I realized we're on borrowed time. As said that we're on the verge of another karf khana, I'll explain what I mean to the listeners. An unplanned security escalation in an extreme situation will occur whereby many civilians will be killed and then it will be very hard to reach a ceasefire. It was very hard as it is, yes. So I called it the Kafkrana affair, I explained it to the Americans. Everything I did was fully coordinated with Biden, with Macron, with Boris Johnson, with Schultz, and obviously with Zelenskyy. But I want to, did you think they could succeed? I have a debate about that with the Americans. I just I think there was a chance and I'll explain. They say there was no chance. But there are two questions. Was there a chance and was it justifiable? Maybe they didn't want you to succeed. Talk about the compromise you thought you could achieve before talking about the meeting itself. There were a few issues. The major issues When I met with Putin, he made two big concessions that are obvious now. They weren't at the time, during the first meeting. No, at the meeting on Saturday. I'll go into that but first, he renounced the denotification, I. E, taking out Zelensky. Yes. He said it in those words, that's why it's so a leader's life is invaluable. And I knew that Zelensky was under threat. He was in a secret bunker. So three, four hours into the meeting, I'm getting to the meeting now. I ask, what's with Are you going to kill Zelensky? He said, I won't kill Zelensky. Then I said, I have to understand that you're giving your word that you won't kill Zelensky. I won't kill Zelensky. After the meeting in the car from the Kremlin to the airport, I contact Zelenskyy by WhatsApp or Telegram. Didn't you fear the Russians would see? No. He has no problem because I was No, the premise is they can see so you call him? I call Zelensky and say, I came out of a meeting. He's not going to kill you. He asks, Are you sure? 100%. He won't kill you. Two hours later, Zelenskyy went to his office and filled himself there on his phone. I'm not afraid. Anyways, that was one concession. The other was that he renounced disarmament of Ukraine. Zelenskyy made a big concession that Saturday too. I think it was the second Saturday after the war broke out. The war broke out on a Thursday, and the next Saturday I was in Moscow. Zelenskyy relinquished joining NATO. He said, I'm renouncing that. These are huge steps on each side. Huge concessions. The war broke out because of the demand to join NATO, and Zelenskyy said I'm renouncing that. Then, what's left a lot. There was The most complex issue is the territorial issue Donbas, the Crimea Peninsula, Crimea, the corridor that was forming between the two, and Mariupol. And the second issue was how will Ukraine protect itself and guarantees. Ukraine demanded of Russia that it be able to get security guarantees from America, France, all the big ones. And there was an argument because to Russia, a guarantee is a pact. It's no different than NATO. This is where I brought my experience. I gave it a lot of thought and said the negotiation is unreasonable because they're negotiating over something they don't have. There's the joke about a guy trying to sell the Brooklyn Bridge to passersby. This guy did exist. Hundred years ago, he sold. They don't have the Brooklyn Bridge. I said that because America will give you guarantees. It will commit that in seven years. If Russia violates something, it will send soldiers after leaving Afghanistan and all that. I said, Vladimir, it won't happen. You won't get any guarantees. Why are negotiating? Then I suggested what I called the Israeli model. We don't have guarantees. I said, I'm the Prime Minister of Israel. We don't have guarantees from anyone. If someone invades us tomorrow, nobody has assured us and no one will come to save us. What we do have is a strong independent army that can protect itself. So let's forget about these guarantees and discuss the parameters for building a military force. What kind of weapons? What planes? How many officers? Soldiers? Because Russia doesn't want Ukraine. This was a cognitive breakthrough that they both accepted. Again, it took time. And then you're discussing which missiles. These are assault missiles. What do they need those for? The territorial issue is and this is pre Kafkana, pre Bucha. Yeah? The Bucha massacre, once that happened, I said, it's over. I saw solutions in that regard too. I'd rather not go into that. They are primarily related to postponing the argument by ninety nine years. All kinds of solutions in the middle. Like David Abidhan said, everything takes time. Time takes everything, yes. To ethics, I knew from our rounds versus Gaza versus Hezbollah, it's very hard to reach a ceasefire. Why is that? As usual, because the internal politics of each side neither side can seem to be giving up, to be losing, to be weak. So, after Zelensky went to war, he didn't go to war. After sustaining a blow, sustaining this war, now he'll back down? Does Putin say anything to you that you deem pragmatic? He was very pragmatic. So was Zelensky. He wasn't messianic. No, no. Give me an example of pragmatism. An example of pragmatism, I won't disclose things I shouldn't. But he totally understood Zelensky's political constraints. And Zelensky was pragmatic too. It doesn't start at once. You have to peel the onion. In every negotiation, each side is all bravado. Put him apart. I'll rip him apart. I'll do this. I'll do that. Fine. Okay. It's a phase you can't see. But once you say, I understand, and you understand their perplexities, then you can gradually get to the crooks of the matter. Let's try to resume a chronological description. You leave on Sunday. I must say, this is very indicative of your personality striving to go there. I mean, it's so far fetched. Why do you even go there? That's who you are. I understand at that point that there's no one else to mediate. Amazing. There isn't. It positions you at a high level of global endeavoring. Suddenly, the man the world is talking about. With this historic role, and you say to yourself, later we'll gauge if it's true and why it didn't work out, but you say, we have this window of opportunity. We're preventing what we see now, millions of refugees, casualties, a country being destroyed, and I can do something about it. I'm cautious. What odds did you give it? 50%. Was it 50%? I think so. And all this right after our call with Putin. Putin says to you, come? Yes. He says come. It was scheduled for a Saturday. We tried to change that, but I didn't hesitate. It was preserving life on a global scope. And keep in mind, all my endeavors are protecting Israel from pressure that can harm us instead of being on one side or another. You're the mediator, so you're not part of Right, the third part. Did it cross your mind? Yes, yes. That's thinking outside of the box. Yes. Not on either side. I'm a mediator. Right. If I take sides, I can't be a fair mediator. Why didn't it work out? Hold on. Then we travel in complete secrecy. In this decrepit plane from Israel. Through the Kazakh region, the Stans because we couldn't fly over the Black Sea, a very long route. We pray and recite the Sabbath blessings. It was very moving. It was very cramped too because the plane wasn't it wasn't a private plane that we leased. Did Mossad arrange the trip? Mossad and Gulata. The poor things. All the my guys are sitting on It wasn't comfy. We were extremely cramped. We land at the Moscow Airport. Several officers welcome us and we go to the Kremlin. By the way, it was my first time in Russia. Besides Sochi, first time in Moscow. It was a cold day. I think it was raining. I see the Kremlin. We go to this huge waiting area. And I prepare my strategy in my mind. I forgot to say that meanwhile, I studied everything in-depth, The history. I read a book on the history of Ukraine and Russia to understand. I consulted with former leaders who dealt with this. I consult a lot. I get Russian experts, negotiation experts, because when you get into something and knew the name of each village, Donbas and the history, what happened in 2014 and 02/2009, what happened all those years. Because you can't come in the middle of the story. It's also important in terms of reliability vis a vis the leaders. They have to understand that you understand them. You're not agreeing with them, you understand. Then we waited outside. There were bowls with chocolates and cakes. Yes, I definitely enjoyed those cakes. I think it showed, was a time. Then I went in to see Putin. Remember, this is at the height of COVID. We sat at both ends of the table. He was scared of COVID, right? I don't know. He stayed twenty minutes away. There was a distance, there was a mic and a speaker next to me. There was the Russian interpreter and Elkin. They sat fairly far away from the table and translated. And we started talking. I understood the basic needs of each side. Again, there were the initial phases at first, and obviously I can't go into detail. I'm just telling you what I can. By the way, I think it's the first time I'm telling all this. And when you peel away, I was under the impression that both sides very much wanted a ceasefire. And as I said at that meeting, Putin made two big concessions after the original demands. He renounced disarmament and denotification. And I say to myself, Wow, this is a huge shift. So he's not gung ho to fight at all costs? No, he has goals to achieve. That's the impression I got, yes. We have to be cautious, someone can always put on an act. I'm describing how I saw it. I left very optimistic because he renounced joining NATO which was the reason for the invasion. Putin said, Tell me you're not joining NATO. I won't invade. He renounced his demands. Then begins the Then I update everyone one after the other. You go to Germany. Right? From there, I go to Germany. My first time in Germany. I made a point of never setting foot in Germany because of the Holocaust. Obviously, don't blame today's German people. I arrive at Scholz's office. I'm there with Shimret, the political adviser. She did a great job through and through. I must say, both she and Eyal Haluta were skeptical. What are you doing? Wait. Take it slow. They're young people. The three of you. Not that young, but they're in their 40s, they're not 70, with a political background, millions of conflicts, but they're very intelligent, polite, and they think I'm going too fast. And I disagree. I say we're going for it. Why is it so important to go to Germany? Because Germany is the player. Germany and France are the major players in Europe. And in order to procure an agreement, everyone has to do something. There are so many things to do. So I had dinner with him about kosher food. We sat with the national security adviser. We were taken to the airport by helicopter. It was weird flying over Berlin in a helicopter. But in all the trips I went over, I wrote down what happened because I couldn't in real time. I wrote a protocol of what we discussed and what the next steps would be, what the disagreements are in the negotiations and what everyone has to do. From there, I think that together, I'm not sure, we updated the Americans and Macron. The Americans? Biden himself or no, usually it was Jake Sullivan, the National Security Advisor. Sometimes Biden, sometimes Blinken. They're very tight there, yes. And Boris Johnson. You know, each leader has their way. Boris was, We can divide the spectrum of leaders. Who's tending more towards, Now we have to fight Putin? Because we mustn't reward the bad guys, right? And who says forget the war, everyone loses, right? Bruce Johnson adopted the aggressive line. Macron and Scholt were more pragmatic. And Biden was both. And that's it. Then I return to Israel and the negotiation marathon of Dros begins. Now the office deals with this, not the foreign ministry or the NFC, And I do everything vis a vis the NFC and with Shimrut. By the way, I noticed that throughout the Russia Ukraine crisis, BB didn't attack me. Interesting. I think he realized we conducted a very intelligent policy. We went back and forth, and then I'll say this in the broad sense. I think there was a legitimate decision by the West to keep striking Putin and not strike Putin? Putin was striking Ukraine. Hold on, yes. But given the more aggressive approach, I'll tell you something. I can't say if they were wrong. Maybe the other thugs in the world would see it. My position at the time in this regard is not a national Israeli interest unlike the consulate or Iran. When I'm concerned about Israel, I stand firm. Yes, here I don't have a say. I'm just the mediator. But I turn to America in this regard. I don't do as I please. Anything I did was coordinated down to the last detail with The US, Germany, France. So they stopped it? Basically, yes. They stopped it. And I thought they were wrong. In retrospect, it's too soon to know. The advantages and disadvantages, the downside of the war going on, is the casualties in Ukraine and Russia. It's a very harsh blow to Ukraine, the country. There will have to be a huge restoration of the infrastructures like the Marshall Plan. The negative impact on the export of wheat and food to the Middle East, although that was partially taken care of, the rise in energy costs which put heavy pressure on the democracies. Then there's the immigration tuna. If there's hunger in Africa, we'll see immigration in Europe, which will threaten Europe. On the other hand, and I'm not being cynical, there's a statement here after very many years, President Biden created an alliance vis a vis an aggressor, in general perception, and this reflects on other arenas such as China, Taiwan, and there are consequences. It's too soon to know. I'm not saying I have one claim. I claimed there was a good chance of reaching a ceasefire. Had they not curbed it? But I'm not sure. But I'm not claiming it was the right thing. In real time, I thought the right thing was a ceasefire. Now I can't say. Maybe it was rewarding the thug too quickly. Maybe it would have conveyed the wrong message to the other countries. Statesmanship is very complex, and there are things I don't want to go into. Why it was the right thing or not in terms of Israel too, in many aspects, but either way, I'm very proud. I was relentless about setting up a field hospital in Elvov. They didn't get why I'm so gung ho about it. Then the foreign minister took on it. Yair Lapi took it on with Nietzsche and got it done. That was a huge source of pride. We're helping. And another thing, it's very legitimate that Netanyahu, who is entering office with very different data compared to ten months ago, will form a different policy. It can be changed. The policy was right. It led Israel safely for ten months to where it is now. And any change is legitimate. Amazing.

@KitKlarenberg - Kit Klarenberg 🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻

One of the 21st century's most important images. Study it. https://t.co/1mETcOBfbn