TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

Saved - August 27, 2023 at 6:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Recent events in Ukraine have raised concerns about the presence of US biolabs near Russia's border. Russia has accused the US of creating bioweapons, and China has indirectly blamed the US for the COVID-19 outbreak. Missile strikes in Ukraine seem to target areas with these biolabs. This situation could have significant implications if Russia believes the US is developing bioweapons. The media largely ignored these accusations, dismissing them as conspiracy theories. It's crucial to investigate the presence and purpose of US biolabs in Ukraine.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

1) HOLY SHIT! I think I may be onto something about #Ukraine. Zelensky said the Russians are firing at “military installations”. How broad is that term? I am seeing speculation that could include US installed biolabs. At first I was like no way. Then I started digging.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

2) First I checked if the US even have biolabs in Ukraine. Turns out… we do. And in classic US fashion, it’s marketed as “defense”. “Biological Threat Reduction Program in Ukraine”. Studying the “most dangerous viruses in the world” at Russia’s border. https://ua.usembassy.gov/embassy/kyiv/sections-offices/defense-threat-reduction-office/biological-threat-reduction-program/

Biological Threat Reduction Program The U.S. Department of Defense’s Biological Threat Reduction Program collaborates with partner countries to counter the threat of outbreaks (deliberate, ua.usembassy.gov

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

3) Okay so we are studying the world’s most deadly pathogens at Russia’s border. It’s just for defense. Not that big of a deal right? WRONG. I didn’t know this until today, but Russia has been accusing US of creating “bio-weapons” at their border. WHAT! https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newsweek.com/russia-china-nikolai-patrushev-vladimir-putin-biological-weapons-1581896%3famp=1

Putin's Adviser Says U.S. Is Developing Biological Weapons Near Russia Nikolai Patrushev told Kommersant that the U.S. has labs by Russian and Chinese borders "reminiscent of Fort Detrick in Maryland." newsweek.com

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

4) And they have good reason to believe that, as the US NIH funded gain of function in Wuhan, then C19 “got out” and it ruined the world. Russia AND CHINA asked the UN for the US/allies to be “checked and limited” in bio capabilities 4 months ago! WHAT! https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3151668/china-russia-ask-un-check-biological-warfare-capability-us-and#

China, Russia ask UN to check biological warfare strength of US and allies Beijing’s envoy urges US to agree to a monitoring mechanism, continuing the finger-pointing after the nations traded barbs over the coronavirus’ origins. scmp.com

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

5) DO YOU ALL KNOW WHAT THIS MEANS?! China and Russia indirectly (and correctly) blamed the US for the C19 outbreak, and are fearful that the US/allies have more viruses (bioweapons) to let out. THIS IS MASSIVE. Yet I’m disturbed that I had didn’t known about this 4 months ago.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

6) So how does that pertain to Ukraine? Well where in Ukraine are the “explosions” taking place. Here’s a reported explosion in Lutsk. This is 75 miles inland in far western Ukraine. The opposite border of Russia… What does this have to do with Crimea/Donetsk in the east?

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

7) Reportedly Kiev has seen missile strikes as well. At their airports and military installations. Kiev is also on the western side of Ukraine. Also a city the US GOV have confirmed the US have built biolabs in.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

8) Putin also continues to call it a “special military operation”. Says he wants to demilitarize and “denazify” the country but not occupy it. What does he mean by that? What is he really targeting?

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

9) Yes, I know he targeted airports and military capabilities; but if Putin really believes, as his admin has stated publicly multiple times, that the US are creating bio weapons at Russia’s borders, then this entire situation could be WAY bigger. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/us-officials-claim-russian-coronavirus-disinformation-campaign-2020-2%3famp

US accuses Russia of spreading conspiracies about the Wuhan coronavirus, including that it's a CIA biological weapon Russia has been spreading coronavirus conspiracies, US officials say. businessinsider.com

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

10) I’m not sure what is going on but in the past 4 months, Russia and China accused the US of creating bioweapons at their borders and none of us heard about and our media wrote it off as “disinformation” and largely didn’t report on it other than to call it a conspiracy theory.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

For all of this to make sense, you must be privy to the reality that the US NIH did indeed create C19 in Wuhan. Which has been largely accepted as the reality and confirmed in the emails between Collins and Fauci. I broke down their official NIH emails released by Congress ⬇️

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

If you respond or quote tweet me, get the hashtag going and see if we can trend it. We need a reporter to ask Biden admin or international reporters to ask their admins what they know about the US Biolabs in Ukraine. #USBiolabs

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

Here’s an overlap of reported missile strike locations and the biolab locations. Since the top map was made, more missiles hit Lviv as well. It certainly appears Putin is targeting the cities and locations with #USBiolabs present. He is 100% going after the alleged bioweapons. https://t.co/25pRod0uiu

Saved - June 21, 2023 at 4:23 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The US-funded biolabs in Ukraine are real, despite mainstream media's attempts to discredit them. Undersecretary of State Victoria Nuland confirmed their existence in a 2022 congressional hearing, and the US Department of Defense released a statement acknowledging their support of Ukrainian labs. However, fact-checkers and left-wing media outlets dismissed the story as a conspiracy theory and defamed the whistleblower, leading to his social media ban. He now reports on the biolabs through a successful Substack newsletter. The FBI and DHS may have been involved in his ban.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

1) Hey Twitter, It's me, the biolabs guy. Aka "Clandestine". I was banned on 2/25/22, 11 months ago, for writing the viral thread about the US funded biolabs in Ukraine (attached). In this thread, I am going to administer the biggest "I told you so" in history. #USBiolabs

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

1) HOLY SHIT! I think I may be onto something about #Ukraine. Zelensky said the Russians are firing at “military installations”. How broad is that term? I am seeing speculation that could include US installed biolabs. At first I was like no way. Then I started digging.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

2) For starters, thank you to @elonmusk for doing the right thing and allowing Free Speech to return to Twitter. Now that I'm free, we are going to go over proof that the biolabs exist, and look at some of the MSM outlets' EGREGIOUS reporting on myself and my viral story.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

3) On 3/8/22, Undersecretary of State, Victoria Nuland, testified before Congress, where @marcorubio questioned her on the existence of labs and biological weapons. @UnderSecStateP admits that there are "biological research facilities" In Ukraine. https://www.c-span.org/video/?c5005520/senator-rubio-questions-undersecretary-nuland-biolabs-ukraine

Senator Rubio Questions Undersecretary Nuland Over Biolabs in Ukraine During her testimony in front of the Senate Foreign Relations committee about the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland answers a question from Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) about whether or not Ukraine has chemical or biological weapons. She replies, "Ukraine has biological research facilities, which, in fact, we are now quite concerned...Russian forces may be seeking to gain control of." She then refutes allegations from Russia that Ukrainians are plotting to use biological weapons, and says that if such an attack happens in Ukraine, "there is no doubt in my mind" it would be caused by Russian forces. c-span.org

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

4) Nuland's testimony went viral. Two days later, @marcorubio tried to save face by questioning DNI Avril Haines. Rubio states "they have labs, these labs are working on dangerous things, and we are worried its going to get out of the laboratory." https://www.c-span.org/video/?c5005524/user-clip-dni-haines-rejects-russia-claim-biowarfare-labs-ukraine

User Clip: DNI Haines Rejects Russia Claim of Biowarfare Labs in Ukraine Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines on Thursday dismissed claims by Russia that the U.S. is conducting biological weapons research in "biolabs" across Ukraine. c-span.org

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

5) In the same hearing, @marcorubio questions @CIA Director William Burns. Rubio admits that "yes there are these labs- a lot of these fact-checkers just said 'don't even mention labs they don't even exist', but they do, they exist all over the world." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkGTwArDmFQ

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

6) And then for good measure, on 6/9/22, The US @DeptofDefense put out a public statement confirming that they: "provide support to 46 peaceful Ukrainian laboratories, health facilities, and disease diagnostic sites over the last two decades." https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3057517/fact-sheet-on-wmd-threat-reduction-efforts-with-ukraine-russia-and-other-former/

Fact Sheet on WMD Threat Reduction Efforts with Ukraine, Russia and Other Former Soviet Un The history and accomplishments of U.S. collaboration with the international community to reduce nuclear, chemical and biological threats in Ukraine, Russia and other countries of the Former Soviet defense.gov

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

7) So now that we have established that the #USBiolabs in Ukraine are very much a reality (confirming that I was wrongly banned on Twitter for reporting on it), lets look at how the "fact-checkers" covered the biolabs in Ukraine when the story first broke.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

8) @PolitiFact: They directly quote me by Twitter handle, cite my thread, declare it as "FALSE" and proceed to smear it as "conspiracy theory" and "Russian Disinformation". "There are no US-run biolabs in Ukraine, contrary to social media posts". https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/feb/25/tweets/there-are-no-us-run-biolabs-ukraine-contrary-socia/

PolitiFact - There are no US-run biolabs in Ukraine, contrary to social media posts Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has brought false claims on social media that Russian President Vladimir Putin is targeting politifact.com

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

9) @snopes: "In February 2022, during the invasion of Ukraine, this false rumor started trending on Twitter after @WarClandestine posted a thread claiming that a map of Russia's missile attacks lined up with the locations of these biolabs." https://www.snopes.com/news/2022/02/24/us-biolabs-ukraine-russia/

Ukraine, US Biolabs, and an Ongoing Russian Disinformation Campaign In an attempt to justify Russia's invasion of Ukraine, propagandists claimed the attack was focused on secret U.S. biolabs there. snopes.com

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

10) @USATODAY: "Based on our research, we rate FALSE the claim that there are U.S. biolabs in Ukraine funded by the U.S. government. The posts misrepresent a treaty between the United States and Ukraine aimed at preventing biological threats." https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2022/02/25/fact-check-claim-us-biolabs-ukraine-disinformation/6937923001/

Fact check: False claim of US biolabs in Ukraine tied to Russian disinformation campaign The Security Service of Ukraine and the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine said the claim is false. usatoday.com

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

11) These are just the big names. There are 40+ more that used the same talking points/sources in their own "fact-check" about the Biolabs. Now let's look at how the MSM reacted when I released my government name intentionally. They took the bait hook, line and sinker. Idiots.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

12) The first "uncovering" was made by the "Anti-Defamation League" @ADL who then proceeded to defame the shit out of me, by government name and photo. Once the other outlets in the Left-wing MSM got their hands on this, they all took their turns. https://www.adl.org/resources/blog/unmasking-clandestine-figure-behind-viral-ukrainian-biolab-conspiracy-theory

Unmasking “Clandestine,” the Figure Behind the Viral “Ukrainian Biolab” Conspiracy Theory adl.org

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

13) @washingtonpost: "According to ADL’s Center on Extremism, Jacob Creech created a slew of anonymous accounts under aliases like “WarClandestine” and “BioClandestine” and posted about the theory across major platforms." Apparently I'm an "extremist". https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/04/06/ukraine-biolab-conspiracy-theory-quickly-went-viral-it-took-weeks-pinpoint-source/

Analysis | The Ukraine biolab conspiracy theory quickly went viral. It took weeks to pinpoint the source. The Anti-Defamation League released new research tying the claims to a string of social media accounts. washingtonpost.com

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

14) @thedailybeast: "@WarClandestine spun a false rumor that Russian airstrikes were targeting “U.S. biolabs” in Ukraine. The conspiracy theory spread like wildfire, and was echoed by Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon, and the Kremlin itself." https://www.thedailybeast.com/restaurant-manager-jacob-creech-started-us-biolabs-in-ukraine-conspiracy-theory

This Restaurant Manager Started the ‘U.S. Biolabs in Ukraine’ Conspiracy Theory The ADL on Tuesday outed @WarClandestine as food service worker and Army National Guard veteran Jacob Creech. thedailybeast.com

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

15) @mmfa: "Clandestine-who caused the the biolabs conspiracy theory to spread widely online -cheered Carlson’s points, calling them 'digestible doses for the normies, culminating into a mass realization the likes of which the world has never seen.'" https://www.mediamatters.org/russias-invasion-ukraine/conspiracy-theory-about-hunter-biden-and-ukrainian-biolabs-went-qanon

A conspiracy theory about Hunter Biden and Ukrainian biolabs went from QAnon supporters and far-right message boards to the Kremlin and Tucker Carlson mediamatters.org

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

16) @NBCNews got in on the action too, citing the @PolitiFact article about me, claiming my story on the Biolabs in Ukraine as a "debunked conspiracy theory". Commonly associating me with "Qanon" and "Russian disinformation". https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/internet/qanon-ukraine-biolabs-russian-propaganda-efforts-boosted-us-far-right-rcna19392

Russian propaganda on Ukraine's non-existent 'biolabs' boosted by U.S. far right Ukraine biolab conspiracy theories have flourished on the U.S. far right and Russian social media. nbcnews.com

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

17) @Newsweek cited @snopes about me. "Russian propaganda claiming the planned attack of Ukraine was actually to target secret U.S. biolabs in the country was also being widely shared on social media." Apparently my reporting "Russian Propaganda". https://www.newsweek.com/us-biological-weapons-ukraine-labs-germ-warfare-1685956

U.S. Biological Weapons in Ukraine—Separating the Facts From the Fiction Russian officials are continuing to spread and old conspiracy theories about U.S.-run bio-labs in Ukraine to justify its invasion. newsweek.com

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

18) @AP_Politics: "in a thread espousing the idea that Russia’s offensive was targeting “US biolabs in Ukraine” -- and was soon amplified by the conspiracy theory website Infowars. It has spread across mainstream and lower-profile social platforms" https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-covid-science-health-donald-trump-0f535c2e136cacab85cfd269dc3124f2

Russia's bioweapon conspiracy theory finds support in US Russia's baseless claims about secret American biological warfare labs in Ukraine are taking root in the U.S. too, uniting COVID-19 conspiracy theorists, QAnon adherents and some supporters of ex-President Donald Trump. apnews.com

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

19) @nprpolitics: called me "QAnon/Far Right". "a thread posted on Feb. 24 claiming that Russian airstrike targets included "US installed biolabs" and citing Russian accusations that the U.S. has been developing "bio-weapons" at those facilities." https://www.npr.org/2022/03/25/1087910880/biological-weapons-far-right-russia-ukraine

How the false Russian biolab story came to circulate among the U.S. far right The war over Ukraine's future is being fought on the ground, in the air — and through social media posts and viral videos that take advantage of America's deeply polarized politics. npr.org

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

20) @Wikipedia has an entire page dedicated to smearing this story and myself. "QAnon promoters were echoing Russian disinformation that created conspiracy theories about US-funded laboratories in Ukraine." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraine_bioweapons_conspiracy_theory

Ukraine bioweapons conspiracy theory - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

21) Left-wing media darling, January 6th committee witness, @NBC, @CNN, @washingtonpost , @nytimes and @NPR contributor; Mike Rothschild: He decided to make it racist, and say that I am a "loser white guy in MAGA country". I wonder if @rothschildmd is aware of the word "irony".

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

21) @VICE: took the liberty of calling all my old employers and told the world my humble work history based on my LinkedIn account. Taking their doxxing campaign to the next level. As you can imagine, finding employment after this was impossible. https://www.vice.com/en/article/wxda7y/ukraine-biolabs-war-clandestine-tucker-carlson

Meet the DC-Area Wine Bar Manager Who Started the Ukraine Biolabs Conspiracy “YOU GUYS TUCKER’S OPENING STATEMENT IS THE BIOLABS STORY. HOLY SHIT WE FUCKING DID IT.” vice.com

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

22) I had to quit my job, move locations, ghost practically everyone I knew in the real world, and try to find a way to generate income, because according to Google, I am a "Russian asset disinformation conspiracy QAnon extremist nazi fascist". Blessing in disguise.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

23) Now I am one of @SubstackInc best-selling newsletters. I make double what I was making as a Manager, reporting on the biolabs that the entire Western media machine claims don't exist. Subscribe here if you'd like to support me! https://bioclandestine.substack.com/p/russian-mil-declares-ukraine-origin

Russian MIL Declares Ukraine Origin of C19! DNC Globalists Created Covid! NEW BIOLOGICAL UPDATE FROM RUSSIA New briefing from Chief of Radiation, Chemical and Biological Defence Forces, General Igor Kirillov, on military biological activities of the United States in the territory of Ukraine. The Russian MIL have been studying biological samples from surrendered Ukrainian soldiers, and what they have been finding is beyond disturbing. Approximately 20% of them carrying West Nile pathogens, which were being studied “by the Pentagon as part of the Ukrainian UP-4 and UP-8 projects”. Suggesting that Ukrainian soldiers are being subject to involuntary biological experimentation and exposure to biological weapons (think Nuremberg). bioclandestine.substack.com

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

24) The entire Left-wing machine was weaponized against me, and I believe @elonmusk has proof the @FBI and @DHSgov put the hit on me, because it happened on all platforms at the same time. Complete social media presence wipe. All over information that was 100% accurate. /END

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

@mtaibbi @bariweiss @lhfang @ShellenbergerMD @elonmusk

Saved - July 16, 2023 at 1:03 AM

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

1) HOLY SHIT… BIOWEAPONS ALERT RFK Jr. claims that the Biolabs in Ukraine are “collecting Russian DNA” to make “ethnically targeted bioweapons”. These are the EXACT allegations Russia made to the UN, and is the main reason for Russia’s invasion! MUST READ THREAD! (This original thread was deleted, but not by me so I am reposting it)

Video Transcript AI Summary
Bio weapons and their potential ethnic targeting are discussed in this video. The speaker mentions their extensive research on the topic and the significant amount of money invested in developing microorganisms for this purpose. They claim that COVID-19 may be ethnically targeted, affecting certain races more than others. Caucasians and black people are said to be more susceptible, while Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese are more immune. It is unclear whether this targeting is intentional or not, but there are papers highlighting racial and ethnic differentials in the impact of the virus. The speaker also mentions the Chinese and their investment in developing ethnic bioweapons, as well as the collection of Russian and Chinese DNA in labs in Ukraine for targeted purposes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And we need to talk about bio weapons. The web I know a lot now about bio weapons because I've been doing a book on it for the past two and a half years. And, and, you know, the the what we the technology that we now have to develop these micro, We have we've put 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars into, ethnically targeted microbes. The Chinese have done the same thing. In fact, COVID nineteen, there's an argument that it is ethnically targeted. COVID nineteen attacked certain races, disproportionately. The the the the the races that are Most immune immune to COVID nineteen are are because of the of the structure of the the genetic structure of of of genetic differentials among different races of the of the receptors of the ACE super sector. COVID nineteen is targeted to attack, Caucasians and and, and black people. The people who are most immune are Ashkenazi Jews and, and Chinese. And but at night, we don't know whether it was deliberately targeted that or not, but there are papers out there that show the, you know, the, the racial and ethnic differential and the impact to that. We do know that the Chinese are spending 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars developing And we are developing ethnic bioweapons. That's where all those labs in the Ukraine are out there. They're collecting Russian DNA. They're collecting Chinese DNA. So we can target people by race.
Saved - August 7, 2023 at 2:29 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The J6 riot was staged to certify a stolen election. Mass mail-in voting, due to a pandemic caused by a human-engineered pathogen, allowed the election to be stolen. Hunter owns a biolab company in Ukraine that studied bat coronaviruses. Joe Biden, with Hunter as proxy, owns the biolab company. Biden won the election due to fraud enabled by the pathogen his own biolab studied. The media lied about the biolabs in Ukraine, Trump's impeachment, and Biden's support for Ukraine. Zelensky burned docs related to US biolab companies. The Deep State released a biological weapon to steal the election and establish a biomedical police state. This is the most sinister crime against humanity. The mission is to make these demons pay.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

J6 was a staged riot so the Deep State could certify a stolen election. But what allowed them to steal the election? Mass mail-in voting, due to a “pandemic”, due to a pathogen that was engineered by humans. Why does Hunter own a biolab company operating in Ukraine? Metabiota was studying bat coronaviruses as part of the USAID PREDICT program from 2014-2019. So essentially Joe Biden, with Hunter as proxy, owns a biolab company, that was studying bat coronaviruses in Ukraine for the 5 years leading up to the release of SARS-CoV-2. Then Joe wins the election, due to fraud, made possible by the human-engineered pathogen, that his own biolab company was studying. Is it starting to make sense now? Is it starting to make sense why the media freaked out and blatantly lied to you about the existence of the biolabs in Ukraine? Why they impeached Trump when he started looking into Ukraine? Why Biden sent hundreds of billions of our tax dollars to defend Ukraine? Why Zelensky ordered his military to burn all docs associated with US biolab companies Metabiota and Battelle? The Deep State created a biological weapon and released it on the world to steal the 2020 Presidential election and establish the biomedical police state. It’s the most sinister crime ever perpetrated on humanity, and the mission never ceases until these demons pay for what they’ve done.

Video Transcript AI Summary
What if the worst biological attack in our country's history wasn't carried out by the individuals who were caught, confessed, and executed? There are coincidences that make me question if someone else unleashed the virus and killed all those people. Would you want to know who it was, even if it was someone working for our government? That's my question. If our own government was responsible for the deaths of almost 100,000 people at St. Mary's and Three Waters.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What if the worst, the most horrifying biological attack in this country's history Speaker 1: Well, I don't understand. We know it was. They were caught. They confessed. Speaker 0: And they were executed, I know. And maybe that's really what happened. But I see this chain of events, These coincidences and I have to ask, what if that isn't what happened? What if someone else unleashed that virus? What if someone else killed all those people. Would you really want to know who it was? Sure. Even if it was someone working for this government. That's my question. If our normal government was responsible for what happened at St. Mary's and Three Waters. If our own government was responsible for the deaths of almost 100,000 people.
Saved - August 15, 2023 at 3:41 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Tucker Carlson's interview with Robert Kennedy Jr. revealed shocking claims about biolabs in Ukraine. Kennedy accused Anthony Fauci of being responsible for bioweapons development, prompting Obama to shut down Fauci's experiments. However, Fauci allegedly moved his operations to the Wuhan Lab and Ukraine. The mainstream media's silence on this matter is concerning. The potential consequences for Fauci and Ralph Baric are significant.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

BOMBSHELL: @TuckerCarlson asked @RobertKennedyJr about the shadowy biolabs in Ukraine. RFK's jaw-dropping answer, if proven true, could shake the very foundations of trust and demands unparalleled consequences for both Anthony Fauci and Ralph Baric. RFK: "Anthony Fauci got all the responsibility for bio-weapons development. [...] In 2014, 300 scientists wrote to President Obama and said 'you've gotta shut down Anthony Fauci, because he is going to create a microbe that will cause a global pandemic.' And so Obama signed a moratorium and shut down the 18 worst of Anthony Fauci's experiments, where most of them were taking place in North Carolina by a scientist called Ralph Baric (@Baric_Lab). Instead of obeying that law, Anthony Fauci shifted lots of his operations offshore. And those operations ended up mostly in Wuhan Lab, which is a military lab [...] and many of them went to Ukraine." Where is the outcry from the mainstream media? New York Times, Washington Post - anyone?

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are US biolabs in Ukraine that are developing bio weapons using synthetic biology, CRISPR technology, and genetic engineering. The Pentagon transferred the authority for biosecurity to the National Institute for Infectious and Allergic Disease, run by Anthony Fauci, who received a 68% raise from the Pentagon for bioweapons development. Every bioweapon needs a vaccine, so they are developed side by side through gain of function science. In 2014, three dangerous microbes escaped from different labs in the US. President Obama signed a moratorium to shut down Anthony Fauci's experiments, but he shifted operations offshore, including to the Wuhan lab in China and Ukraine. Funding for these labs comes from various government agencies, with USAID being the largest funder.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So so let me add this to Speaker 1: an interesting segue because Torian Nuland kind of blithely announced during congressional testimony last year that, oh, by the way, we have these bio labs in Ukraine. Yeah. And that was, like, kind of ignored, and the people who covered it got attacked for covering it. But the fact remains there are US biolabs in Ukraine. Why would we have biolabs in Ukraine? Speaker 0: We have bio lab, labs are claimed because we're developing bio weapons. And those bio weapons are using all kinds of It was synthetic biology and CRISPR technology and genetic engineering techniques that were not available to previous generation. They can make frightening, Right. Thanks. What happened was, and, when we walked away, when the patriarch reopened the bio weapons in 2004, the Pentagon began putting a lot of money into bio But they were nervous at that time because if you violate Geneva, the Geneva convention, it's a hanging offense. And they weren't sure that that provision in the Patriot Act would actually hold up as a loophole to treaties that have been Ratified by Congress. They were nervous about actually going full force in the bioweapons development. So they transferred the authority Or biosecurity to 1 agency in the HHS called the National Institute For Infectious and allergic disease isn't run by Anthony Fauci. So Anthony Fauci got all the responsibility for bioweapons development. He got at that time a 68% raise from the Pentagon in order to do that work. So, and that's why he was the highest paid official in American, in the American government of 4,000,000 people in the American. He's the high. He has more money. He got more money. $450,000 a year than the president. Any Supreme For Judge, a member of congress, he was the highest paying. And it's because he got that 68% raise from the Pentagon to do bioweapons Now when you do bioweapons development, every bioweapon needs vaccine. So you develop them side by side. Because in a 100% of the cases, when you deploy a bio weapon, there's blowback. Your side also gets sick. So in order to deploy 1 offensively, you need a vaccine to counter. So you need to vaccinate your team before you deploy it. So those 2 things are developed through a field of science called gain of function science where you take infectious, We take an infectious microbe and you amplify its infectivity. Or you make a jump species, so it may kill monkeys. Now you make it killing humans. And you adopt it that way and there's all kinds of methods. And then you make it immune to antibiotics, the therapeutic Drugs and other therapies. So it's actually the inverse of medicine. For 2,800 years since Hippocrates, Doctors have been trying to figure out how to make microbes less infectious and less deadly and develop Products and therapeutics to do that. Well, the guys who are involved in this, there's 36,000 what are called life scientists, but They're actually dead scientists, who are now employed full time and developing microbes that will, Can be used to kill people. Speaker 1: But given the experience we just had 3 years ago Yeah. Where a virus from a bio our lab. Yeah. Up turn. So let Speaker 0: me just finish this brief history about what happened. In 2014, 3 of those microbes escaped. On the fact sheet built labs all over the country in Galveston and Boston and everywhere They're BSL 4 labs. We don't even know how many there are BSL 3 and BSL 4. We have no idea how many there are. And there's, you know, we've counted and I have a The book coming out that goes through the ones we know. But there are many secret ones that people don't know about. And they're doing it here in the United States. I mean, 2014, 3 bugs escaped from 3 different labs. And they were high profile breaks and They were very dangerous in smallpox and a couple of other bad, bad, bad microbes. The public learned about it, and there was a lot of publicity in congress held the hearings. 300 scientists wrote president Obama And said, you've got to shut down Anthony Fauci because he's going to create a microbe that will cause a global pandemic. And so Obama signed a moratorium that shut down the 18 worst of Anthony Fauci's experiments where most of them were taking place in Galveston And and Speaker 1: in North Speaker 0: Carolina, it's not just called Ralph Barrick down there. And, and instead of obeying that law, Anthony, she shifted a lot of his operations offshore. And those operations ended up, most of them in the Wuhan lab, which is a military lab. And that the Chinese run the People's Liberation Army. And then a lot of them went to the Ukraine. So a lot of that science And it's funded not Fauci was funding lots of it. But then the other government agencies began to get confidence in Their ability to get away with it. And most of it is being funded by the Department of Defense. The most of all, the biggest single funder is USAID, which is a CIA cut
Saved - December 9, 2023 at 12:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
This comprehensive article covers various aspects of the origin of SARS-CoV-2 and the COVID-19 pandemic. It includes information about scientists investigating the virus, the ranking of bioweapons, the role of EcoHealth Alliance, the book "The Truth about Wuhan," gain-of-function research, the involvement of Dr. Anthony Fauci, whistleblowers, leaked emails, and the potential lab leak theory. The article also touches on the CIA's involvement, the role of Ukraine's biolabs, and the connection to Harvard University. It concludes with a summary of gain-of-function research and its implications.

@mommaleo - Jenny

THIS FRIDAY! Don’t miss this XSpace! 🔥@CharlesRixey is a member of DRASTIC, a group of international scientists and researchers investigating the origin of SARS-Cov-2 and the COVID-19 pandemic. He previously served as a career CBRN (WMD) professional in the United States Marine Corps including positions as an officer instructor and 8 years as the CBRN for Marine Corps Embassy Security Group, training the 2.000 Marines that guard American Embassies and consulates under the department of state. Bookmark the XSpace with Jake (@AmericaShaman ) - BE THERE! He has an announcement and he’ll let us know what the team has been up to! 🔥@AGHuff 🔥@NestCommander 🔥@Doctor_I_am_The 🔥@53v3n0fn1n3 https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1ynJOynXdBWKR

@mommaleo - Jenny

@mommaleo - Jenny

@CharlesRixey - Charles Rixey, MA MBA (c) 🐭

[1] In 2018, a group of retired military leaders/scientists ranked 33 known bi0weαροns in 12 relevant categories In 2022, they scored SARS-CoV-2 w/the same rubric As a potential BW, the COVID-19 virus was 4th-of 34 Food for thought @KimDotcom @RWMaloneMD https://academic.oup.com/milmed/advance-article/doi/10.1093/milmed/usac123/6586077?login=false

@mommaleo - Jenny

Bio: Honored Guest Charles Rixey, MA MBA (c) @CharlesRixey

Video Transcript AI Summary
I served in the Marine Corps for 15 years, specializing in WMD. I was an instructor and worked with the Department of State. As the WMD chief, I oversaw the deployment of 2000 marines to embassies worldwide. I am also a member of the international group, Drastic, investigating the origin of the pandemic. Around 70-80% of the evidence presented to Congress comes from Drastic's findings. I worked with Major Murphy and together we released a grant proposal showing intent to create a virus similar to SARS CoV 2. Currently, I am collaborating with colleagues in Japan, Germany, and the United States, preparing evidence and affidavits for a future grand jury hearing to hold Fauci and the NIH accountable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 15 years in the Marine Corps. I was at WMD. That was my job. I was an instructor teaching our job to new new, enlisted and officers. I spent 8 years working with the department of state as part of that. So I was the WMD chief on the marine side for the 2000 marines that go to the embassies. 188 embassies and consulates. So I'm pretty familiar with how things are supposed to go. And then, I've also been a member of drastic, for two and a half years, investigating the origin of pandemic and drastic. Is this A group of on international, scientists and researchers. And I would say that 70 to 80% of the evidence that has been going around congress in the different committees over the last couple of years has come from drastic findings. Not just mine, but several several others. And, and I I was also the person, who purse who works with major Murphy. And then I brought the the diffuse proposal which basically was the grant that was where they where they showed. It's literally proof of intent to create a virus that looks exactly like SARS CoV 2. So I I, I worked with him and we ultimately decided to release that through drastic. And Now, I work in a lot of different areas. I know all the topics you've talked about that you mentioned, I know a lot about. And currently, I'm working with my friend here, Kevin in Japan. And with friends in Germany, in the United States, and we're preparing what we've already prepared and submitted, evidence and affidavits for a future grand jury hearing involving one of the states, who's finally going to pick it up. And, and the grand jury hearings and pull Fauci in the NIH into court because congress still won't do it. So so right now, I'm in Japan for a month working on some projects involving that.

@mommaleo - Jenny

Publication by Honored Guest: DR. Andrew G. Huff PhD, MS @AGHuff Former EcoHealth Alliance Vice President and Senior Scientist 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙏𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝 𝙖𝙗𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙒𝙪𝙝𝙖𝙣: 𝙃𝙤𝙬 𝙄 𝙐𝙣𝙘𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝘽𝙞𝙜𝙜𝙚𝙨𝙩 𝙇𝙞𝙚 𝙞𝙣 𝙃𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙤𝙧𝙮 Get the Book Here👉https://www.amazon.com/Truth-about-Wuhan-Uncovered-Biggest/dp/1510773886 𝐒𝐡𝐨𝐜𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐧𝐞𝐰 𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐰𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐡𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐖𝐮𝐡𝐚𝐧, 𝐂𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐚, 𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐂𝐎𝐕𝐈𝐃-𝟏𝟗 𝐨𝐮𝐭𝐛𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐤 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐮𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐜𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫-𝐮𝐩.   The day that Dr. Andrew G. Huff left his senior scientist and vice president role at EcoHealth Alliance was one of the happiest days of his life due to the corruption he had witnessed at the organization. However, he never thought working there would be of any great consequence to the future. He was wrong. Because, as an EcoHealth Alliance insider, Dr. Huff had had a ringside seat to one of the biggest cover-ups in history.    The Truth about Wuhan contains new research and a breakdown of how and why the development of COVID-19 in the United States and China was supported by the US government to collect intelligence on laboratories in China. Dr. Huff, an expert in the fields of bioterrorism and bio warfare, is a whistleblower who will show why the reasons the lab leak was covered up are incorrect. He worked on the classified research side of the program as a US government scientist. He knows the real how and why COVID-19 emerged. Besides exposing the conspiracy and cover-up, Dr. Huff also puts forth policy solutions and recommendations to prevent a lab leak virus from plaguing the world again.   The Truth about Wuhan simply explains the complexity of the system that led to COVID-19’s emergence; how the medical industrial complex grew and became entrenched in gain of function work after 9/11; why EcoHealth Alliance was the (almost) perfect intelligence collection cover; the policy actions and decision-making process as to why the United States government engaged in the COVID cover-up; how and why the United States swapped biotechnology with China and biomedical corporations; and the incentives for each of the actors or governments to engage and coordinate a global cover-up of COVID-19 origins.   The Truth about Wuhan also shows how and why Dr. Anthony Fauci is intricately involved in the COVID cover-up; how scientists like EcoHealth Alliance president and CEO Dr. Peter Daszak rose to power and used their influence to corrupt science and the COVID origin investigation; and how the intelligence community likely orchestrated the cover-up with Dr. Anthony Fauci.   Dr. Huff also provides personal harrowing accounts of how the US government waged a psychological operation against him to prevent him from speaking out. COVID-19 is the biggest lie, scandal, and intelligence failure in US history, and Dr. Andrew G. Huff is stepping out of the shadows to share his insider story about this failure that led to millions of deaths around the world.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker recounts their friend Andrew Hoff's ordeal with the FBI. They mention Donald Rumsfeld's quote about unknown unknowns and how Andrew's knowledge led to his family's tribulations. The speaker questions why they didn't take action against the pandemic despite their experience in public health preparedness. They highlight Andrew's surveillance by drones and invasion of privacy. The speaker urges viewers to consider Andrew's perspective and read his book, which claims that both science and the US government are broken. They mention Andrew's decision to become a whistleblower and his growing popularity on social media platforms.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 2021 at 9:27 AM Good morning, Jason. Have someone at the FBI that you can refer me to right now. It's an emergency. Now with good conscience, Can any of you honestly say that's how you want a conversation to begin? Unfortunately, That's my first memory of the journey that my friend, Andrew Hoff, and his family have been on for the last few months. Donald Rumsfeld once said, and I've often repeated in various iterations, among other interesting lines of thinking, There are unknown unknowns. Well, in my mind, now There are things that I cannot unknow. I cannot forget the tribulations that Andrew and his family And community where they live had, have, and continue to endure since this Escapade began. One of my initial responses back to him, after confirming that I'd made a few phone calls and gotten him the contacts that he needed thanks to some trusted colleagues, was asking about his wife and young son. The goosebumps that I get, even today as I write this, Thinking about how she felt and what their little guy will never know about until he's able to read And understand the overt violations of not only their home and their civil liberties, But also their world as they know it. And why? Because Andrew Hough knew, And nose, too much. What ensued in the following couple of days Not only gave me goosebumps but also forced me to rethink everything that I'd read, heard, Learned and followed since December 2019 when, as a public health guy, I was aware of what was going on and hoping it wasn't going to be as bad as it could be. I had worked in local, county, state, And Federal Public Health in various anti terrorism capacities and public health preparedness, Developing a myriad of response plans for everything from community based smallpox mass vaccination To pandemic influenza readiness, to Anthrax point of distribution, PODs, To antiviral distribution plans based on evolving guidance from the CDC's Public Health Emergency Response Teams. How could we have seen this coming and not done anything about it? Why was this research being conducted? Who was paying for it? Could it really be the biggest Facade in the history of the world. Put yourself in Andrew's position. Imagine being surveilled by drones, tailed everywhere he went, and then to find out that they were in his house, Violating his personal space to listen to who he was talking to, what he was saying, And when? Put yourself in his position and open your mind to all he has to say in this book. CHAPTER 1. Both science and the US government are broken. During the week of October 25th 2021, I decided to come forward as a material witness and whistleblower related to SARS CoV 2. That week, my popularity on LinkedIn and Twitter seemed to be taking off as my followings on both platforms were rapidly increasing. Before the rapid increase, To say that I was bad at social media platforms was an understatement. Maybe it wasn't so much that I was bad at social media, but that my personality and style often come across to others
503 - Service Unavailable Error amazon.com

@mommaleo - Jenny

@CharlesRixey @AGHuff 🦠@NameIsSpartacus SUBSTACK w/Everythjng COVID Spartacus  @ICENI https://open.substack.com/pub/iceni?r=2ltpfv&utm_medium=ios Biodefense Mafia References https://open.substack.com/pub/iceni/p/7th-livestream-with-kevin-mccairn?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

ICENI Bulletins | Spartacus | Substack Revealing COVID-19's Origins. Click to read ICENI Bulletins, by Spartacus, a Substack publication with tens of thousands of subscribers. iceni.substack.com
7th Livestream with Kevin McCairn and Charles Rixey & Biodefense Mafia References We had a great discussion on a wide range of topics iceni.substack.com

@mommaleo - Jenny

@CharlesRixey @AGHuff @NameIsSpartacus @Iceni Charles Rixey MA, MBA (c): @CharlesRixey ABOUT https://prometheusshrugged.substack.com/about SUBSTACK: Prometheus Shrugged https://prometheusshrugged.substack.com/

About - Prometheus Shrugged DRASTIC's COVID-19 Origin Investigations - General Political & Data Analysis. Click to read Prometheus Shrugged, by Charles Rixey, MA, MBA (c), a Substack publication with thousands of subscribers. prometheusshrugged.substack.com
Prometheus Shrugged | Charles Rixey, MA, MBA (c) | Substack DRASTIC's COVID-19 Origin Investigations - General Political & Data Analysis. Click to read Prometheus Shrugged, by Charles Rixey, MA, MBA (c), a Substack publication with thousands of subscribers. prometheusshrugged.substack.com

@mommaleo - Jenny

FAUCI’s leaked emails https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23316400-farrar-fauci-comms

Farrar Fauci Comms (Tobias FOIA) documentcloud.org

@mommaleo - Jenny

SARS CoVd2 Gain of Function Research Violations of Law Dr Richard Fleming's @Doctor_I_am_The ZOOM presentation for the BASES2021. July 11th 2021,. This is a crucial and extremely detailed presentation over the severe issues of criminal violations on many fronts , now proceeding to the Nuremberg courts. https://youtu.be/3GzzBD1kJ0g?si=woFD1F-LFoadusLs

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Fleming presents on how SARS-CoV-2 gain-of-function research violated international law. He discusses topics such as the US funding for this bioweapon, the nature of the bioweapon as a prion with SARS-CoV-2 as the delivery system, identifying the virus, vaccine effectiveness, treatments, and the accountability of those responsible. He traces the research back to 1999 when funding was provided for infectious diseases of coronaviruses. Various grants and developments in the US and China are mentioned, including the synthetic alteration of coronaviruses. The presentation also highlights a 2007 research project recommending the immediate shutdown of international travel during a pandemic. Gain-of-function research gained attention in 2011 with the release of a highly infectious H5N1 avian influenza virus.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My pleasure to be here, Miles. Thank you so much. I'm gonna share the screen and, begin the presentation. Well, Myles and everyone, hello. This is Doctor. Fleming from the Dallas Fort It's my pleasure to present how SARS CoV two gain of function research violated international law for the 2021 Basis Summer Conference this 11 July 2021. As always, I want to mention briefly the Conflict of interest that I am the patent owner for something called plumbing method or FMTVDM and the Author of the Inflammation Heart Disease Theory that explains how inflammatory diseases like heart disease and a variety of other diseases are associated with a number of factors including, bacteria and viruses, including SARS CoV-two. We're going to cover 6 topics today. We're going to look at how the United States paid for this gain of function bioweapon. We're going to look at this bioweapon for what it really is, a prion bioweapon with the virus SARS CoV-two merely being the delivery system. We're gonna look at how do we know what virus we're actually dealing with. We're going to ask the questions, how effective are the vaccines really and are they needed? We're going to look at treatments for this bioweapon. And finally, we're going to address the very important issue of Nuremberg too, for holding the people accountable Responsible for funding, development and dissemination of this bioweapon. Research in the United States can be dated back to 1999 when the Health and Human Services Provided funding for infectious diseases of coronaviruses. A year later in 2000, Ralph Barrick Began the initial process of using reverse genetics to rescue an infectious clone known as SARS CoV- urbani, something that will be very important as we get through the presentation. Within 2 years, colleagues of Ralph Barrick, including Curtis and Young at the University of North Carolina obtained a patent that was paid for by NIH grant GM 63228 For Recombinant Engineering or Reverse Genetics for the Development of Infectious Replication Defective Coronaviruses. Also in 2002, Doctor. Shizeng Li at the Wuhan Institute of Virology received funding Anne proceeded to develop infective, Coronaviruses, including the use of HIV pseudovirus Glycoprotein 120, a prion in its own right. The following year in 2003, Ralph Berwick received another NIH grant allowing him to synthetically alter Coronaviruses or Corona Veriday. The first, notation in the published literature of SARS CoV 2 was not in 2019, But actually back to a Chinese paper in 2006 and any place that you see asterisk, as you see here, you'll see an associated Publication at the very bottom. Throughout these slides, you will be able to look up for yourself these actual published papers and read More detail on your own. In 2007, the National Science Foundation published research that Would have been well known to anybody in infectious disease in 2019. That research project looked at the best Plan of Action for a Pandemic. This was done at Indiana University and institutions in both Italy and France and the conclusion was You must immediately shut down international travel if you believe you have a pandemic. 4 years later in 2011, the world became Painfully familiar with gain of function research as labs at the University of Wisconsin and in the Netherlands Allowed to get out: a very infectious gain of function research virus for the H5N1 Asian Avionic Influenza
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2012, gain of function research was discussed at a conference, focusing on its importance in understanding disease pathogenesis, antimicrobial resistance, and developing better surveillance, vaccines, and therapeutics. The speaker mentioned that gain of function can occur naturally or be created through mutations and genetic techniques. They also noted that increasing transmissibility may decrease pathogenesis, and vice versa. In 2013, a new coronavirus called MERS emerged, and research showed that immediate treatment upon symptoms was effective. In 2014, there were incidents of accidental exposure to anthrax and the discovery of forgotten vials of smallpox.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And this conference was done in 2012. Speaker 1: Integral to that study has always been the issue of gain of function research, not only for influenza, but essentially for all infectious diseases research. Now there are a few ways to look at gain of function research. There's the naturally occurring mutations which naturally give gain of function, and investigators study these effects on the phenotypes of interest. Does this mutation make something more transmissible, more pathogenic or adapt to host better or what historically investigators have done is to actually create gain of function by making mutations, passage adaptation, or other newer genetic techniques such as reverse genetics x and genetic reassortment. When we do that, often some g some phenotypes appear and others disappear. For example, it is commonly seen that when you increase a transmissibility, you may see a decrease in pathogenesis, or vice versa, you may deliberately increase pathogenesis and see a decrease in transmissibility, but the bottom line is that gain and loss of function research is critical to understanding disease pathogenesis, antimicrobial resistance and host responses as well as to developing better techniques of surveillance, vaccines, and therapeutics, specifically to gain a function research on HPAI h five n one. Speaker 0: Okay. Because you've got the, the video, and you know who that is. That is, doctor Anthony Fauci in 2012 dealing with, the consequences of this. In 2013, Only a year later, another coronavirus was well documented for fatalities in Saudi Arabia and South Korea, and that virus is known as the Middle Eastern Respiratory Virus or MERS. We learned from research during that period of time that treatment of these viruses were quite doable and manageable. However, it required immediate treatment upon symptoms of individuals. Barrick and several Chinese Physicians at the time began to isolate several coronaviruses of particular interest, those with what's known as an HKU four spike, Which up until that point in time had been unable to actually infect people, although their future work would change that. By 2014, the CDC had another problem with gain of function and release of infectious pathogens where several of the CDC workers were accidentally exposed to anthrax. Again, there was shipment of deadly influenza virus, and the NIH discovered 50 year old vials of smallpox Not kept in isolated areas that they had forgotten about.

@mommaleo - Jenny

@Doctor_I_am_The Here is another non-controversial thread by Andrew. 🤣Note the sarcasm. This is what we love about him. His courage, strength, and resilience.

@AGHuff - Andrew G. Huff, PhD, MS 🇺🇸

The Next Phase 2.0 🧵 #Thread The new uniparty versus the old uniparty. The end does not justify the means.

@mommaleo - Jenny

WHAT is Gain of Function Research? Gain-of-function experiments aim to increase the transmissibility and virulence of existing viruses, making them deadlier for humans. The stated purpose is to better understand pathogens and to develop vaccines for possible future pandemics. Critics say this type of research is extremely dangerous and should be banned or regulated. They claim it has not prevented any pandemics to date, and that the COVID-19 outbreak might be the result of an accidental release from a lab that was conducting #gainoffunction research.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Gain of function research, which involves making viruses deadlier or more infectious, has sparked controversy amid debates about the origin of the coronavirus pandemic. The research aims to predict and prepare for future pandemics, but it has not yet resulted in any preemptive vaccines or prevented any pandemics. The methods used include genetically modifying pathogens and conducting experiments on animals. Concerns arise from the potential for accidents and the risk of manmade viruses falling into the wrong hands. The Wuhan Institute of Virology has been at the center of scrutiny, with allegations of inadequate safety protocols. The debate highlights the need for international investigation and community involvement in determining the risks and benefits of high-risk research.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are supercharged lab enhanced viruses becoming a global threat? Gain of function research? Speaker 1: Gain of function. Speaker 2: So called gain of function research known as gain of function. Speaker 3: The controversy around so called gain of function research has erupted alongside the heated debate around the coronavirus pandemic's origin. Speaker 2: It's a tale of 2 theories. A lot of Democrats pooh poohed the whole idea of the lab leak. Speaker 4: Prominent public health experts saying that the lab leak theory, which was hawked by conspiracy theorists might actually be credible. Speaker 0: This has moved high risk gain of function research from the secretive shadows into the public spotlight, we've set out to investigate why, how, and where this type of research is being done, and what the risks and benefits are. Speaker 3: So what exactly is gain of function? It is a type of research that makes pathogens like like viruses, deadlier, are more infectious to humans. The researchers intentionally modify the virus in lab experiments to give new functions. For instance, the ability to spread by air or attack human nerve cells. Gna function research seeks to make a virus more easily con between humans to increase the severity of the disease it triggers or to make it resistant to existing treatments or vaccines. Sounds crazy. Speaker 0: Two main reasons are given for why this type of research is done. One is to better predict which viruses in animal relations might one day naturally mutate and become infectious for humans. The second is to be better prepared when a new pandemic hits, for instance, by already developing a vaccine for it preemptively. Speaker 5: There are obviously valid reasons for gain of function research, and the main reason is to understand pathogens better, to understand the way they transmit and behave and thereby to make vaccines, drugs, etcetera. Speaker 3: So how many vaccines have been developed as a result of gain of function research. Speaker 6: None. There have been no Preemptive vaccines to date. Speaker 3: Have any pandemics been prevented thanks to gain of function research? Speaker 7: The answer is not that I know of. Speaker 5: Not that I'm aware. Speaker 3: What's clear is that it didn't prevent this coronavirus pandemic. Speaker 8: Actually, none of the gain of function research that was done over the past decades, however, like, none of it contributed to finding a vaccine or or cure for SARS CoV 2 for COVID nineteen. But in the future, there could be potential for that. Speaker 0: Some scientists think this is a perfectly legitimate endeavor. Others say it's akin to checking for a gas leak by holding a match to the gas pipe. In the effort to protect us from a pandemic, scientists could cause a pandemic. Speaker 3: So let's look a bit more closely at how gain of function research is done. One method is to genetically re engineer pathogens by inserting genes from 1 virus into another to make it more aggressive. Speaker 0: Another simpler method is called animal passaging. Researchers inject a virus into ferrets or so called humanized mice. These mice have been genetically manipulated to have human lung receptors. The virus undergoes slight mutations as it passes through several generations of mice. The scientists select the strongest mutations until the virus eventually becomes transmissible to humans. Speaker 8: The scientific technology today is so good that you can make a whole genome of a virus with no scars, no no seams or anything. It looks perfectly natural. In 2011, an extreme gain of function experiment rocked the science world. Speaker 0: Scientists used the serial passaging method to make the h 5 n one avian flu virus more transmissible to humans. The lead scientist, Ron Foucier, claimed he created one of the most dangerous viruses courses you can make. Speaker 8: They had taken a virus that was deadly, but but not good at infecting humans and made it also very infectious. So that kind of research, I think, is the risk, immensely high. If it broke out, There would be just widespread death. But the benefits, what are they? Many scientists look at this experiment, and they think, why? Why did you do this. Speaker 0: The thing with the avian flu is that it is extremely deadly with an infection fatality rate of approximately 60%. Compare that to a a rate of under 1% for COVID nineteen. Luckily, this virus hasn't leaked from a lab so far, But another worry is that a manmade virus like this one could end up in the wrong hands. Speaker 5: The main concern was the publication of the research because once you publish it, then nefarious actors can also have access. It's like if you publish a method on the internet on how to hack a bank account, do you think someone's gonna use it? Of course, they're gonna use it. Right? And several, you know, terrorist groups have made their intention to use biological warfare known. Speaker 3: High security BSL 4 labs built for research on highly infectious pathogens are booming around the world, and 3 quarters of them are located in densely populated urban areas. Gain of function research is being conducted in some of these labs in the US, China, Europe, and other countries, although nobody knows for sure in how many of them. But surprisingly, gain of function experiments are not done exclusively in high security BSL 4 labs. Some are done in level 2 and 3 labs. Speaker 8: We recently found out that the Wuhan your virology was doing a lot of this SARS, like, virus research at a very low biosafety level. So at a level that you would feel unsafe working with airborne viruses at BSL 2, you you may or may not be wearing a lab coat. You definitely should be wearing gloves, but normally you don't wear a mask at BSL 2. So if you're looking for airborne viruses, live viruses at BSL 2, viruses that can spread through the air like SARS COVID 2, then you are completely exposed. It it was not an appropriate biosafety level for working with these SARS like viruses. Speaker 3: Researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology were collecting and researching bad coronaviruses and using humanized mice called prior to the COVID nineteen outbreak. But the top researcher, doctor Xizeng Li, denies she was conducting gain of function research. Speaker 1: We know, from all of the records from the NIH grant applications from papers published by the Wuhan Institute of Virology Experts That they were engaged in aggressive research and aggressive work that was making scary pathogenic viruses scarier. Better able to infect human cells. Speaker 6: Doctor Shi, she says we did not do Gaining a function research to increase infectivity. Right? She picked out Just the one. No. She didn't do to increase infectivity. She did to change the host range to make it infectious to us. Speaker 0: Making the disease a virus triggers more deadly is one possible aim of gain of function research. Courage. Another is to make a virus that would normally only attack animals better able to infect a different type of host, humans. What is making things murky is that different definitions of gain of function are circulating simultaneously. Speaker 8: The reason why it's so confusing and so complicated is because scientists do not know where to draw the line between regular experiments And gain of function experiments that are very concerning. Speaker 5: So it's only when there is a potential to cause harm to humans that it becomes gain of function research of concern. Speaker 0: But the question into the origins of the pandemic were stifled in early 2020 funny. When an open letter was published in the medical journal, The Lancet, that effectively snuffed out all the debates. Speaker 1: They were very well intentioned. But even in the name of those good intentions engaged in what I call scientific propaganda and thuggery, designed to drive, consensus when the evidence didn't support that consensus. Speaker 9: It was basically trying to called shut any scientific debate, and it was quite obvious because there is no way you can reach these conclusions when you don't have data. Speaker 6: People said that's a conspiracy theory. That's That's no conspiracy theory. That's an honest, scientific possibility. Speaker 5: You probably know that most people who've been, shouting down the possibility of a lab leak virologists. And you know, I'm not not casting aspersions here. You know, There's many imminent virologists, and we need them, and their work is vitally important in in, especially in pandemics, but, you've got to think about best interest. Speaker 8: If this came from a lab, that means that Science has led to millions of people dying by accident. So it's a very uncomfortable thing to think about. It's very Unpleasant idea for scientists. Speaker 3: It wasn't until a group of citizen journalists began to investigate and analyze online databases that the lab leak theory reemerged. The group calling themselves drastic revealed that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was actively working with SARS CoV-two viruses over many years, Including the closest known relative to the pandemic virus using inadequate safety protocols. They also discovered that the lab and Chinese authorities have methodically attempted to conceal these activities, I start to get suspicious and start to investigate. Speaker 9: You have to called play games to try to, you know, get the data. And China is very good at removing things. But if you get there on time, You can get an awful lot. Speaker 1: There's been a lot of important information that's come out as a result of what they're calling internet sleuths, but it's really it's people who were just recognizing that our world is at risk, and our governments and the UN system weren't doing, what needed to be done. Speaker 0: When the WHO looked into the question in early 2021, it concluded that a lab leak was extremely unlikely. But the report was criticized due to the team's lack of access to key data. President Biden has since asked US intelligence agencies to look into the matter, but so far, there has been no thorough international investigation. Speaker 8: Up to now, we have not had an investigation of the origins of COVID nineteen. That China WHO joint study, has been widely described as a investigation by a lot of media, but they admit that they never had the mandate and they never had the powers or influence to be able to go in there and investigate. So all the evidence right now is circumstantial. We need to have a credible investigation. Speaker 5: If it does turn out that this pandemic was caused by a lab leak, It's going to change the practice of virology forever everywhere. Speaker 0: Although the lab leak theory has recently gained traction, there's still no definitive proof of either a market origin or a lab leak, and both theories remain plausible. But the whole controversy around the origin of the coronavirus has deflected from the larger and arguably more important question, whether high risk research with deadly pathogens should be pursued at all. Speaker 3: The reason being that accidents happen, and they happen a lot, even from the highest security labs. Speaker 6: And it happens all over the world, internationally, crucially, not any one particular country. Speaker 0: As a result of a slew of accidents in US labs Involving bird flu, Ebola, and anthrax. In 2014, the Obama administration put a moratorium on gain of function Research. But the ban was full of loopholes. Speaker 6: First of all, it was a funding moratorium. You could go on working. If you had money from someplace else, from some other government, or out of your own university, you could go and do what you want. And, of Kurdish people went all all over the world and and continued to do it. Speaker 0: The US moratorium, however limited, was lifted in 2017. But even if there are demonstrable and important scientific gains resulting from this type of research, the question remains, are the risks it's worth it. Speaker 7: Such work can be important because you can argue that by such studies, we will understand better what it takes to block it if an epidemic appears. But at the same time, you're going to ask as an interested, intelligent person, not a virologist, You can say, yeah, but by doing so, aren't you creating something that will be more infectious for humans? The answer is yes, But we're learning. And you can say, yes, you're learning, but are you weighing the scale between risk and benefit? Is the gain, which you're not even sure of this much, but the risk is this much. Isn't that really plausible here? And if so, should we be doing those experiments? I think that's a legitimate discussion. Speaker 5: What's happened in biology is very analogous to cybersecurity, where the technology has just leaped ahead way beyond the governance. The governance our governance of these things is sitting in the last century. Called. But the technology has just stained the head. Speaker 1: It cannot be that individual scientists are making species wide decisions. That doesn't mean there's not a very important role for scientists, but we need to have broader, more inclusive, more democratic frameworks for figuring out the best ways forward. Speaker 7: I would not ban it, but I would Ask it to be reviewed with international standards. And I would have on committees people beyond Expert virologists. Speaker 8: I think the public needs to be involved. So definitely this problem should not be regulated by scientists and then performed by scientists ourselves. So because the outcomes of a pandemic, it's not just that only scientists get sick, everybody gets sick. So it affects the whole globe. That's why this sort of research where the risks are extremely high, they need to be discussed with non scientists as well. Speaker 5: I think we need community consultation. We need the community engaged and knowledgeable. We actually did some research to find out How much do people in the general community know about this stuff? And it's very little. And when you give them the information, the factual information, they don't find it acceptable. You know? They they don't find it acceptable to begin with, but the more information get you give people, the less acceptable it becomes to them. So I think, You know, we need to involve the community, because the community is the most important stakeholder for which all the benefits and the harms apply. Speaker 2: There should be transparency. It is not normal that the public didn't know before what was gain of function. The society has the right to know what what is being done. Speaker 1: The worst case scenario is we have another pandemic that's much worse than this one. And we're entering the age of synthetic biology where it's easy to imagine a much more dangerous pathogen than the one we are facing now. This could be a life or death moment for our species. And we have this opportunity, of this pandemic as terrible as it's been to learn the lessons. And to learn those lessons, we need to do a fearless examination of what went wrong. Speaker 8: With the growing number of labs in the world now working with these dangerous pathogens collecting them, studying them, maybe doing a bit of gain of functional research for them, we we are entering called an era, it's quite likely that there will be a lab based pandemic. And if we don't deal with that, we're just just flying blind. Speaker 0: Regardless of the true origins of the COVID nineteen virus, which we may never know for sure, society still needs to grapple with where to draw the line for research that's done with good intentions and in good faith, but that could put all of humanity at risk if anything goes wrong.

@mommaleo - Jenny

#GuestSpeaker👉 Dr. Andrew Huff @AGHuff is a multidisciplinary scientist and conducts research in high performance computing, risk analysis, bioterrorism, spatial analysis, modeling and simulation, epidemiology, emerging infectious disease ecology, and environmental health as it relates to agricultural and biological food production systems, biosurveillance systems, and public health. Dr. Huff was a member of the U.S. Army where he served two combat tours as an infantryman and has been an active participant in government committees and private sector organizations that work to establish safe and effective policies for food production systems, the environment, and public health systems.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker begins by discussing their military career, serving in combat tours and doing counterterrorism work. They then talk about their educational background, including degrees in psychology and engineering, as well as a PhD in public health. They mention being offered positions at various government agencies and working at Sandia National Laboratories. They later transitioned to a job at ECLAF Alliance, where they focused on building machine learning and artificial intelligence platforms for detecting emerging infectious diseases. They mention being promoted to an executive position but becoming disillusioned with the company. They then discuss their expertise in SARS COV-2 and their belief that the government is lying about it. They mention being targeted and publishing a book called "The Truth About Wuhan."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I started off my career, in the US military. I enlisted right after 911 and served as an infantryman. Served 2 combat tours, Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom, where I did counterterrorism work actually in Central America and then also did narcotics and addiction. So a little bit different there. After coming out of the military, I earned degrees in, psychology, that was my undergrad. I switched to engineering for my master's degree, which was a lot of work. I also have a master's minor in, geographic information systems. I was gonna go work in the private sector, and I was talked into accepting a full research fellowship, for the Department of Homeland Security to earn a PhD in public health, emerging infectious diseases which is a subdivision of environmental health, but for all practical purposes, it's epidemiology. I really kick butt, I guess, at my At my dissertation, my PhD program, I I knocked it out in two and a half years, which is pretty much unheard of. They were paying me about 140 k a year salary as a research fellow as a PhD student. So this is the the ultimate offer as a PhD student, and they were basically grooming me to be, an Anthony Fauci type of national security, I started spending about a week per month on average in Washington, DC, meeting with alphabet soup, of agencies where I became an expert in biowarfare, bioterrorism. And I was presenting my work, which was becoming an expert at poisoning people, actually. And then trying to figure out how to medic mitigate that kind of thing. So when I finished my PhD, I was offered positions at at all the alphabet soup at agencies. And my advisers pretty much told me, you know, if I wanted to work at a specific agency in the government, they could get me in there. I I spoke I accepted a Top secret position at Sandia National Laboratories, which is where they primarily make nuclear weapons, out in the desert near Albuquerque. But Once again, I worked on public health, advanced simulation and modeling, and I also completed a postdoc, or I'd call more continuing education at MIT in complex systems, where we use, supercomputers to basically war game and predict the consequences, all sorts of what we lovingly referred to as painless shit. Well, I got sick of working in the classified space, and I applied to a job at a place called ECLAF Alliance. I was hired right away, as a senior scientist. I took over a failing department, and I brought in about $6,000,000 in department defense spending to build machine learning and, basically, artificial intelligence platforms, to predict and detect emerging infectious diseases, which is known as biosurveillance. Well, be careful for what you with what you wish for, I guess, in life. I ended up basically ended working on the same kinds of things, at Equine Alliance, which I was doing on the classified side for the US government. But due to my success, I was promoted to, an executive as a vice president at equal health. And once I was promoted, I saw all sorts of craziness, which I couldn't really believe, but I went along with it, unfortunately. I actually reviewed the gain of function, SARS COVID 2 COVID proposal When I first started at equal health and when I left equal health, I was really happy. I had a follow-up with my old boss, doctor Peter Gasick. He lied about a number of things. I found him to be a dishonorable person. And where my story gets crazy is I went on to be a a 10 year professor, as a tech executive. Then fast forward to late fall 2019 and I find out about the emergence of SARS COV 2 before they're talking about the news because this is my field of expertise. I'm always looking for these kind of things. And Over the the course of 2020, every time the government opens its mouth, I know that they're lying about something. I began to investigate. I kept all my documents from my time at Equal clients. And fast forward Patient to, big name journalists where I believe the department defense, the FBI, and the CIA had been eavesdropping on my phone call phone calls with these journalists, namely Alex Berenson. And then I'm targeted in drafts, like, you couldn't believe, and that goes on for about a year. And then I published a book which, I just arrived at my house today. The first copy is, The Truth About Wuhan, How I Discovered the Biggest Line in History, and I'm sure you'll have a ton of questions

@mommaleo - Jenny

Attached is a deposition filmed 17 days ago Andrew G Huff: ‘This is a deposition recorded at my home in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan with Attorney Thomas Renz, of Renz Law in Ohio. This deposition was under oath with penalty of perjury related to my employment at EcoHealth Alliance where Dr. Peter Daszak was my direct supervisor. If you are an attorney, and you would like to retain my services as an expert and first hand witness related to COVID wrongful death litigation, patient care wrongful death claims, mRNA vaccine injury claims, then please contact me via email at AGHUFF@protonmail.com Please follow him on X (formerly twitter) @AGHuff Link to full deposition rumble.com/v3wymtr-dr.-an…

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tom Reynolds interviews Dr. Andrew Hoff about his work with Equal Health Alliance. Dr. Hoff has a background in psychology, security technology, spatial science GIS, and environmental health. He also has a high-level security clearance and served as a combat veteran. Dr. Hoff worked at Eagle Health Alliance from the fall of 2014, initially as the senior scientist in charge of the data technology department and later promoted to associate vice president of data and technology.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How many times are I Speaker 1: for reading? Alright. So this is Tom Reynolds. I'm with doctor Andrew Hoff. And Andrew, we are going to have a written declaration on the penalty of I agree that's gonna reflect everything that we're talking about here. You've agreed to that. Is that correct? Yes, sir. Alright. And we've talked already about the fact that you're providing us testimony until we turn to. And I'd like to have you promised to tell Hello. Okay. So we're gonna talk about A few brief issues related to, your work with Equal Health Alliance. So, Doctor, you're Okay. What what is your, what's your your background? Your scientific background? What are your degrees in? Speaker 0: My undergraduate degree was psychology. My master's degree is security technology, spatial science GIS. My PhD is environmental health with the emerging infectious disease Just the at MIT in complex systems. Speaker 1: Right. Alright. And you are also a veteran, and you have a pretty high level security clearance. Is that correct? Speaker 0: Yes. I am combat veteran. Yes, sir. OEF and OIF. I had a Q clearance, which is a Department of Defense Top secreting. The equivalent, through the Department of Energy when I worked at Sandy and Ash Laboratories. Speaker 1: Alright. Wonderful. Okay. What years did you work at Eagle Health Alliance? In Speaker 0: the fall of 2014. Speaker 1: Alright. And you served there in what capacity? Speaker 0: I was hired as the senior scientist in charge of the department of, data technology. And due to my SAS has promoted to associate vice president of data and technology. Speaker 1: Alright.

@mommaleo - Jenny

Dr. Richard M Fleming @Doctor_I_am_The Dr. Richard M. Fleming is a physicist, nuclear cardiologist, and attorney with fifty-three years of research experience. He has spent decades investigating what causes multiple health problems including heart disease, cancer, and SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19. He joined the American Heart Association in 1976 and actively began teaching and researching heart disease; including both what causes heart disease and how to accurately find heart disease. In 1994 he presented his original theory on "Inflammation and Heart Disease" which was published in a cardiology textbook in 1999 and presented on 20/20 in 2004. His research career has also involved investigating and correcting errors made in medical testing including coronary arteriography and nuclear imaging; for both heart disease and cancer.  In 2017 after two decades of work he patented the first method capable of measuring regional blood flow and metabolic changes occurring inside the body. This method known as FMTVDM (Fleming Method) makes it possible to accurately determine what is happening inside the body as well as whether treatments prescribed for patients are working or not. Below is Dr Fleming’s sword deposition Link: https://youtu.be/odhkL2JTm7g?si=VkUaZqc__rczSNif

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks Dr. Fleming if he is prepared to testify that COVID-19 is a bioweapon, to which he responds affirmatively. Dr. Fleming's qualifications are briefly discussed, including his medical and law degrees, as well as his experience as an inventor and author. He is asked if he has the ability to read and interpret medical patents, to which he confirms. Dr. Fleming wrote a book exploring the possibility of COVID-19 being a bioweapon, providing evidence of gain-of-function research and funding sources. He also discusses genetic modifications made to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, including the PRRA insert and HIV insert, which are not naturally occurring. The research of Shi Zhengli and others is mentioned, highlighting their efforts to increase the virus's infectivity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you prepared to testify under oath here today that COVID nineteen is a bioweapon? Speaker 1: Yes, I am. Speaker 0: Doctor. Fleming, we've asked you to come testify about whether COVID nineteen and related vaccines are a Deliberate bioweapon attack on the United States. Madam, court reporter, can you please identify yourself for the record? Speaker 2: My name is Karen Esher, Texas CSR number 5536. Speaker 0: Thank you. Can you please swear in the witness? Speaker 2: Doctor. Fleming, will you raise your right hand? Do you swear the testimony you give today will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God? I do. Speaker 0: Doctor Fleming, do you consent to this testimony being used in any appropriate proceeding? Yes, I do. 1st, I'd like to cover some of your qualifications, you have a Impressive 90 page resume. I'm not gonna go through that, but very briefly, are you a medical doctor? Yes, I am. So therefore you have an MD degree as it's known? Speaker 1: I do, yes. Speaker 0: And what is your area of specialty? Speaker 1: Nuclear cardiology, cardiology and internal medicine. Speaker 0: And do you also belong to professional medical associations? Yes, I do. Are you a fellow of the American College of Physicians? Yes. And are you a fellow of the American Society of Internal Medicine? Yes. And you also hold a PhD? Yes, I do. And in what field? Physics. And you also have a law degree otherwise known as a JD? I do. And are you an inventor in the medical field? Yes. And very briefly, can you explain the type of medical inventions that you've invented? Speaker 1: The ability to image the body and determine what types of disease processes are going on by looking at metabolism and blood flow. Speaker 0: And do you hold patents for your inventions? Yes, I do. Is it fair to say you're familiar with the world of medical patents? Yes. Do you have the ability to read and interpret medical patents? Yes, I do. And are you also an author of professional papers? Speaker 1: Yes, sir. Speaker 0: And approximately how many? Somewhere between 4500. And do you also serve on the editorial board of professional journals? On editorial boards and review boards for the journals. And briefly, what does a reviewer in a professional journal do? Speaker 1: The obligation is when somebody submits a paper for publication for reviewers to take a look at That material to determine if it's scientifically valid, to determine if it makes a difference in the field, and to Make recommendations back to the editorial board about whether the paper should be accepted or revised or rejected for publication. Speaker 0: Are you prepared to testify under oath here today that COVID 19 is a bioweapon? Speaker 1: Yes, I am. Speaker 0: You wrote a book posing the question, is COVID nineteen a bioweapon, correct? Speaker 1: Correct. The function of the book was to provide information that the general public could look at and also to provide evidence for the legal System and the medical system to understand the gain of function research that's been carried out over a couple decades To show where the monies came from, to show what papers were published, showing what types of gain of function research occurred, and to show the patents, To clearly lay out 2 decades' worth of work that's been conducted, funded primarily by the United States, although other countries have been involved, And to show how there's no evidence that SARS CoV-two, the virus that causes COVID nineteen, No evidence to show that it's naturally occurring, no animal model for it, and to show the type of research that's been done with coronaviruses, Funded by the U. S, supported by NIAID, NIH, Department of Defense, Monies went to Peter Daszak at EcoHealth, to Ralph Beric at the University of North Carolina, Chi Chi Zeng Li at the Lwuhan Institute of Virology And there's several other universities around the country, including in the state of Texas. Speaker 0: [Dr. Did you also look at the genetic code of the SARS CoV-two virus and especially the spike protein? [Dr. Speaker 1: We did as well as Professor Luc Montagnier, who is the gentleman who discovered the HIV virus, and several other individuals that we, note in the book. Speaker 0: And based on that review of the genetic code, that informs your conclusion that this is a bioweapon? Speaker 1: Right. So The Biological Weapons Convention treaty states that any adjustment or modification of a biological agent like this virus that doesn't provide a benefit for mankind, is a biological weapon. These particular changes in this virus, including the PRRA insert, which are Amino acids that were inserted that are very critical for the urine cleavage site for this virus to infect, the insertion sites that were made with HIV and simian or AEF like, HIV equivalent viruses, the prion like domain at the top of the spike protein as well as The HIV glycoprotein 120 insert that Xi ZhengLi put in early on that's critical for the attachment of this virus to cells, all of Speaker 0: which are not naturally occurring. So to be clear, the SARS CoV two virus, otherwise known as COVID nineteen, And especially its spike protein is not something that's simply involved on its own in nature? Speaker 1: We've looked at all the different coronaviruses that exist on the planet. None of them have the PRRA insert. None of them have this tremendous amount of HIV insert. None of them have a regional binding domain that is a Prion like binding domain, which means that where it attaches to the cells, it's a prion like domain and prions are things that Are abnormal proteins that cause other proteins to become abnormally folded? Doctor. Speaker 0: Benjamin Greenberg: So to be clear, genetic changes were made to the spike protein In a lab to create what is known as the COVID nineteen, correct? Speaker 1: That's what all the data shows. Speaker 0: Your book references research in twenty And by Shi Zhengli, who's often called the bat lady. Was that research designed to determine how to increase the Like protein binding capacity to the human ACE2 receptor. So that was her goal of that Speaker 1: of that research was to increase the ability of the virus to infect human cells. Speaker 0: Now interestingly, I think in this published research, they discovered that the naturally occurring spike protein from Horseshoe bats was unable to bind to the human ACE 2 receptors. Speaker 1: Right. That's exactly right. Speaker 0: So as of 2010, scientists Including Xi ZhengLi in Wuhan, China knew that naturally occurring horseshoe backed coronavirus spike proteins could not infect humans. Speaker 1: That's right. Speaker 0: Based on your testimony, it sounds like you discovered at least 2 manmade inserts into the SARS CoV-two spike protein Genetic code that prove it was produced in a lab? Speaker 1: Right. The research papers that Shizeng Li and Barrick and others published, they were very clear and Somewhat proud of the fact that they've been able to modify the virus and to insert changes into it that made it more infective and potentially more dangerous.

@mommaleo - Jenny

𝙎𝙥𝙚𝙘𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙂𝙪𝙚𝙨𝙩: Dr Kevin McCairn PhD @NestCommander Principal Investigator at the Korea Brain Research Institute Systems Neuroscience and Movement Disorders Laboratory (Retired) The research conducted in my laboratory, using electrophysiology and PET imaging, is focused on trying to understand how the circuits of the cortico-basal ganglia-cerebella networks encode both motor and neuropsychiatric abnormalities in nonhuman primates. In addition, the lab is also focused on treatments for motor and neuropsychiatric disorders. We use a technique called deep brain stimulation to target critical nodes within the cortico-basal ganglia-cerebellar network and try to measure the behavioral and neural correlates of any therapeutic response. 𝙍𝙚𝙨𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙘𝙝 𝙂𝙖𝙩𝙚 https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kevin-Mccairn 𝙑𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙤 𝘾𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙣𝙚𝙡 https://t.wtyl.live/accounts/kevin_w._mccairn_phd

Video Transcript AI Summary
I contracted SARS in South Korea during the outbreak. It caused neurological symptoms and was different from the flu or norovirus. I couldn't get a proper diagnosis, but I realized it was serious when I saw what was happening in Wuhan. There was an effort to suppress information beyond the official narrative. I believed it came from a lab and published a paper on it. I've been trying to inform people about the role of viruses in chronic neurodegenerative diseases. The spike protein in the virus can misfold and cause amyloidosis. There are safety concerns with gene transfection, and we're seeing excess deaths, especially in dementia cases. Synthetic peptides may be a contributing factor.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, to cut a long story short, I came into contact with SARS, 2019, December, in the what was the biggest outbreak hotspot in South Korea. And this this was an illness that, was and let's say some people have an easy time with SARS and Some people don't and I had a number of predisposing comorbidities, including TBI and it was it was my, dalliance with the virus, which caused a lot of neurological symptoms with myself that I realized this isn't anything, usual. It's not flus. It's not like a norovirus or anything like that. It was long sustained. Had a long fight to get back to, normal. And this was this happened just as the, outbreak was sort of being announced in Wuhan. And we have data now which shows that SARS was probably circulating far, far earlier, maybe in the summer, the September. And so I could I couldn't get a proper diagnosis. But as soon as I saw what was happening in Wuhan and what I'd been through personally, I was like, I went, to the effort of trying to, warn people that this isn't just a respiratory pneumonia. This has far more, debilitating disease profile. And what I what I found personally was, and now with hindsight, we know that they had, in place organized narrative control networks to try to, contain public the public's the their curiosity, I guess, about the disease itself and what they were actually dealing with and there was a very large effort to suppress anything beyond the orthodox line coming out, say, from the CDC or European, medical institutes. And it was coming up against that initial, censorship that made again, sort of reinforced my idea because It was I was convinced that it came out of a laboratory very early on. I went public with that, but I I collaborated with a group called Plastiq. We published a paper about, the synthetic nature of SARS CoV-two. And, you know, I was I was pushing that it comes out of a lab and it can have debilitating, a debilitating profile for again. At the beginning, we didn't know who and how many would, suffer in particular. And, you know, as we got wiser, we realized that there was a very, distinct age stratified risk. And what I've been trying to do since then is just inform people about the role of viruses in the formation of these chronic neurodegenerative inflammatory linked diseases that, in my opinion, come from. There's, well, there's multiple there's multiple peptides in the virus itself but also we've taken the very, very bizarre decision to have gene transfect people and have them make the same spike protein that, at the amino acid level, has the same profile. And what we're talking about when we mentioned prions, is the ability to misfold and there's this you'll often hear sort of overlapping language with respect to, and something called amyloidosis. And the prediction software, so this is would be what we call in silico studies, identified that the spike protein has numerous amyloidogenic epitopes on its structure on its as part of its structure. And so we've been sort of aggregating the data with respect to how that's impacting at a clinical level with respect to the disease but also, people who have had, adverse events in response to gene transfection itself. And right now, I'm of the opinion that, considering the, prion like nature of these peptides, that there's too much of a safety signal that we're seeing right now that should preclude their use until we can, fully dismiss the potential that it could be causing, long chronic disease emergence, particularly in the neurodegenerative domain. And we must, the problem is, is that many studies don't have a long enough window to be looking for these types of adverse events. So they'll say, oh, 14, 28 days later, generally people are okay but what we're seeing in the, statistical data at an epidemiological level is that we have sustained excess death, literally across all age groups but and the primary categories in which this is happening is the dementia categories and Richard can speak better to the cardiovascular but these signals are there and they're being classed as non COVID in these waves of excess death which we're having now, which are running generally around 10% to 20% above where they should be. And it would it's my contention that as we've seeded the environment with synthetic, chimeric amyloidogenic peptides, either through viral transmission or through direct gene transfection is probably one of the contributing factors to the deaths that we see. So I hope that wasn't
ResearchGate - Temporarily Unavailable researchgate.net
Kevin W. McCairn PhD http://www.mccairndojo.com https://www.mccairndojo.com/ Twitter @DrKevinWMcCair1 Telegram: https://t.me/DrkevinMcCairn​​​​ Support the stream https://paypal.me/raccooncommander?country.x=GB&locale.x=en_GB https://www.buymeacoffee.com/DrKevinMcCairn https://streamlabs.com/kevin-OHneKg https://buy.stripe.com/28ofZqenB37z9KEfYZ https://www.patreon.com/join/4229182? https://www.subscribestar.com/kevin-w-mccairn-ph-d https://www.mccairndojo.com/​​​​ Research History - Kevin W. McCairn Ph.D. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kevin_McCairn Main/ Channel: Kevin W. McCairn Ph.D. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIXxVUZVApFm9oANI-ryYXA Bitcoin: 34JZjBeTrG2w9AVB8Tpdt1PVt78UoWrMZV Bitcoin Cash: qqfuagsmg9xk5gsptke88y42jan8x5mauyj2yng2hp Ethereum: 0xB8bE2a9A2edCbb77A6a2Cd289032Cecad3C92aFE Ethereum Classic 0xE4fa23aBBdA9B0c8DEa5d7Bfc2665E25dE83B58F Litecoin: MFVDyqCNpMfFnDPWTtaxVtgCcPpkaTeeuy XRP-Wallet: rw2ciyaNshpHe7bCHo4bRWq6pqqynnWKQg XRP-Tag: 470905637 t.wtyl.live

@mommaleo - Jenny

𝐁𝐈𝐎𝐋𝐎𝐆𝐈𝐂𝐀𝐋 𝐖𝐄𝐀𝐏𝐎𝐍𝐒 𝐓𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐓𝐘 ꧁𓊈𒆜🅰🆁🆃🅸🅲🅻🅴 🅸𒆜𓊉꧂ Undertaking never under any circumstances to develop, produce, stockpile, acquire or retain biological weapons. ꧁𓊈𒆜🅰🆁🆃🅸🅲🅻🅴 🅸🅸𒆜𓊉꧂ Undertaking to destroy biological weapons or divert them to peaceful purposes. ꧁𓊈𒆜🅰🆁🆃🅸🅲🅻🅴 🅸🅸🅸𒆜𓊉꧂ Undertaking not to transfer, or in any way assist, encourage or induce anyone to manufacture or otherwise acquire biological weapons. ꧁𓊈𒆜🅰🆁🆃🅸🅲🅻🅴 🅸🆅𒆜𓊉꧂ Requirement to take any national measures necessary to prohibit and prevent the development, production, stockpiling, acquisition or retention of biological weapons within a State’s territory, under its jurisdiction, or under its control. ꧁𓊈𒆜🅰🆁🆃🅸🅲🅻🅴 🆅𒆜𓊉꧂ Undertaking to consult bilaterally and multilaterally and cooperate in solving any problems which may arise in relation to the objective, or in the application, of the BWC. ꧁𓊈𒆜🅰🆁🆃🅸🅲🅻🅴 🆅🅸𒆜𓊉꧂ Right to request the United Nations Security Council to investigate alleged breaches of the BWC, and undertaking to cooperate in carrying out any investigation initiated by the Security Council. ꧁𓊈𒆜🅰🆁🆃🅸🅲🅻🅴 🆅🅸🅸𒆜𓊉꧂ Undertaking to assist any State Party exposed to danger as a result of a violation of the BWC. ꧁𓊈𒆜🅰🆁🆃🅸🅲🅻🅴 🆇𒆜𓊉꧂ Undertaking to facilitate, and have the right to participate in, the fullest possible exchange of equipment, materials and information for peaceful purposes. Link: https://disarmament.unoda.org/biological-weapons/

Biological Weapons Convention – UNODA disarmament.unoda.org

@mommaleo - Jenny

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐓𝐞𝐚𝐦 𝐃𝐑𝐀𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐂: 𝐃𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐑𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐜𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜 𝐓𝐞𝐚𝐦 Investigating Covid-19. D.R.A.S.T.I.C. are the scientists and researchers who came together in early 2020 to investigate the origins of Covid-19 and bring the TRUTH the world. 𝙆𝙚𝙮 𝘾𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙗𝙪𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙨 🅼🅰🆁🅲🅷 2020 Discovered the link between RaTG13 and BtCoV4991. In March 2020, Rossana Segreto made the first public connection between RaTG13 and BtCoV4991 and in April 2020 published a preprint about the possibility they might be the same virus. 🅰🅿🆁🅸🅻 2020 First comprehensive analysis of gain-of-function work done at WIV In April 2020, Yuri Deigin published the first in-depth analysis of gain-of-function work done at WIV and how it could have led to SARS2 leaking from their lab. 🅰🅿🆁🅸🅻 2020 Discovered the link between RaTG13 and the Mojiang mine In April 2020, Yuri Deigin traced the origin of RaTG13 to the mine in Mojiang, which then prompted TheSeeker to discover a Master’s thesis and a PhD thesis on an unusual case of pneumonia in the same mineshaft where RaTG13, the closest relative to SARS-CoV-2, was found. Mona and Rahul Bahulikar later published a paper on these Mojiang miners’ cases. 🅼🅰🆈 2020 Discovered that the WIV virus database has been taken offline In May 2020, Yuri Deigin was the first to publicly report the deletion of the WIV virus database. 🅼🅰🆈 2020 The peculiarities of the FCS: CGG-CGG codons and FauI site In May 2020, @ydeigin pointed out the peculiar CGG-CGG codons and FauI restriction enzyme site in the PRRA insertion in SARS2 which created a novel furin cleavage site. 🅹🆄🅽🅴 2020 Discovered that RaTG13 was sequenced long before 2020 In June 2020, after WIV released RaTG13 sequencing data, Francisco de Asis found that RaTG13 was sequenced long before the pandemic rather than after, as was implied in WIV’s February 2020 Nature paper. RaTG13 amplicon fasta headers showed dates back to 2017 and 2018, and also a label referred as “7896” pointing to one of the eight viruses close to SARS-CoV-2 after RaTG13. 🅽🅾🆅🅴🅼🅱🅴🆁 2020 Published the most widely cited lab leak hypothesis peer reviewed paper In November 2020, Rossana Segreto and Yuri Deigin published their paper “The genetic structure of SARS-CoV-2 does not rule out a laboratory origin”. Their paper was mentioned by several mainstream media outlets, as one of the first peer reviewed papers considering a possible lab origin of SARS-CoV-2. It has since become the most widely cited lab leak hypothesis paper, as well as one with the highest Altmetric score. 🅼🅰🆈 2021 Published 3 more WIV PhD theses showing work done on RaTG13/BtCoV4991 In May 2021, TheSeeker has published 3 more PhD theses from WIV which showed there was active work done on RaTG13/BtCoV4991, including full genome sequencing in the 2019 PhD thesis. We also pointed out that the BtCoV4991 spike gene seems to have a 1% difference from the RaTG13 spike gene, raising questions as to whether the two might actually not be identical.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A new investigative piece by Katherine Eban in Vanity Fair raises questions about the lab leak theory of COVID-19's origin. The analysis highlights how a group called DRASTIC, made up of scientists and researchers, examined the theory that was initially dismissed by those in charge. Conflicts of interest and political motivations hindered the investigation into the Wuhan Institute of Virology's gain of function research. The State Department received classified information about three researchers falling ill in November 2019, sparking renewed interest in the lab leak theory. The investigation also discovered that the lab's virus sample database was taken offline months before the pandemic officially started. The lab leak theory is plausible, but politics and bureaucratic obstacles have hindered a full explanation. This could further erode public confidence in institutions and impact democracy. The media's lack of independent investigation may also lead to a loss of credibility.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The coming crisis of confidence. I am Michael Smirconish in Philadelphia with a question. How did a novel bat coronavirus get to a major metropolis of 11,000,000 people in Central China in the dead of winter when most bats were hibernating and turn a market where bats weren't sold into the epicenter of an outbreak? When asked that way, the lab leak theory of the origin of COVID nineteen, it sounds quite plausible? A newly released investigative piece by Katherine Eban in Vanity Fair raises that Question and a lot more. This analysis has accelerated a conversation long overdue. It tells the story of how a loose network of sleuths of varying scientific expertise spread around the globe undertook an examination of a theory of COVID origin that was initially discounted by those whose job it was to figure it all out? Together, they formed a group called DRASTIC, Decentralized Radical Autonomous search team investigating COVID nineteen? One founder was a data scientist who works for a bank in New Zealand whose Asperger's syndrome gives him a professional advantage in finding patterns in data? But while he was building a plausible case for lab leak, more than 2 dozen scientists released a statement in a respected medical journal saying this, We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID nineteen does not have a natural origin. Now to be sure, there were crackpots and political hacks hoping to pin the origin on a Wuhan lab in the hope of gaining a cudgel on China and the boost to then President Trump? After all, it was Trump who said early on that he had seen classified information indicating that the virus had come from the Wuhan Institute of Virology? When asked what the evidence was, he said, I can't tell you that. I'm not allowed to tell you that. But the question now is whether people in government and the scientific community fearful of being drawn in a national political debate or being cast as nativist did not pursue a theory that was worthy of exploration? EBAN conducted a months long investigation, interviewed more than 40 people, reviewed hundreds of pages of government documents and found this, conflicts of interests stemming in part from large government grants supporting controversial virology research, hamper the US investigation into COVID nineteen's origin at every step? In one state department meeting, officials seeking to demand transparency from the Chinese government say they were explicitly told by colleagues not to explore the Wuhan Institute of Virology's gain of function research because it would bring unwelcome attention to US government funding of it? In the summer of 2020, when state department leads had gone cold, they got a tip from a foreign source? Key information was likely sitting in the US intelligence community's own files unanalyzed. In November, that lead turned up classified information that was absolutely arresting and shocking, said a former state department official. Three researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology all connected with gain of function research on coronaviruses had fallen ill in November 2019 and appeared to have visited the hospital with symptoms similar to COVID nineteen, so said 3 government officials to Vanity Fair? The reaction inside the State Department? Holy shit. According to 1 senior official who recalled the instance, we should probably tell our bosses and the investigation roared back to life? And remember the guy with Asperger's? Well, in January of 2021, there was an international fact finding visit to Wuhan. A dozen international experts visited. They were told that the lab's database of some 22,000 virus samples had been taken offline to prevent a hack during the pandemic, which seemed to make sense, except that the ad hoc group of investigators at DRASTIC figured out that the database was actually taken offline on September 12, 2019, 3 months before the official start of the pandemic? So, here is my takeaway. 1st, that the lab leak theory is plausible, not assured, but plausible. Second, that politics and bureaucratic turf wars hamper the full explanation of the lab leak theory. My ongoing larger concern is the damage this is going to do to public confidence in other institutions at a moment when we can least afford further erosion? If the lab leak theory was erroneously discounted, it will fuel speculation about the role of authority in other exercises like elections, just the sort of thinking that led to the events of January 6 and is already being used to imperil democracy all across the country? Suddenly, the phony Arizona audit will be harder to discount and science will suffer? Look no further than climate change? I can hear the skepticism already. How do we really know it's man made because they told us the virus came from a bat at a wet market? The criticism of climate science has long been that it was research money driven. The Vanity Fair piece similarly highlights the role of money sum American in the Wuhan lab and raises questions about the solidarity of the gain of function research community? And this too must be said. This will further revelations as they come out early discounting the lab leak theory, the media will suffer a loss of credibility for its lack of independent investigation. The Vanity Fair report, it doesn't come to a conclusion as to whether the COVID virus began naturally or in a lab leak, but It convinced me that politics mattered and thwarted the leaked investigation and one ramification of this analysis is bad news for our institutions. It will further distrust in science and even democracy when we can least afford it?

@mommaleo - Jenny

The documents seen by 𝘿𝙍𝘼𝙎𝙏𝙄𝘾 were made available by an anonymous source. They detail past achievements and planned experiments in collaboration with researchers from: Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) East China Normal University (ECNU) UNC-Chapel Hill, Duke-National University in Singapore The USGS National Wildlife Health Center (NWHC) Palo Alto Research Center (PARC). ꧁༒☬𝓓𝓸𝓬𝓾𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽 1:☬༒꧂ A brief DRASTIC Analysis of the EcoHealth Alliance DEFUSE Proposal DRASTIC ANALYSIS OF DARPA DEFUSE PROPOSAL https://drasticresearch.files.wordpress.com/2021/10/preempt_hr00111880017_notes_v1_b-1.pdf ꧁༒☬𝓓𝓸𝓬𝓾𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽 2:☬༒꧂ The Reasons why the DEFUSE Proposal was Rejected by DARPA DEFUSE PROJECT REJECTION BY DARPA https://drasticresearch.files.wordpress.com/2021/09/defuse-project-rejection-by-darpa.pdf

@mommaleo - Jenny

@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander 【D】【A】【R】【P】【A】 Preventing Emerging Pathogenic Threats (PREEMPT) https://drasticresearch.files.wordpress.com/2021/09/prempt-background-hr001118s0017.pdf

@mommaleo - Jenny

@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander 𝘿𝙍𝘼𝙎𝙏𝙄𝘾 𝘼𝙣𝙖𝙡𝙮𝙨𝙞𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝘿𝙀𝙁𝙐𝙎𝙀 𝘿𝙤𝙘𝙪𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙨 https://drasticresearch.org/2021/09/20/1583/

DRASTIC Analysis of the DEFUSE Documents Exposed! How EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan Institute of Virology Collaborated on a Dangerous Bat Coronavirus Project "The DARPA DEFUSE Project" Note: The original leaked documents are available there: https://drasticresearch.org/2021/09/21/the-defuse-project-documents/ The DRASTIC analysis follows below: DRASTIC was recently made aware of documents provided by a whistleblower, which show that EcoHealth Alliance (EHA) in concert wIth… drasticresearch.org

@mommaleo - Jenny

@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander TRUMP didn’t know about gain of function nor WUHAN because FAUCI kept it secret.

Video Transcript AI Summary
President Trump was not aware of the gain of function ban repeal process that started before he became president. Anthony Fauci worked without supervision during the 18-month period when Trump did not appoint a new science adviser. Congressional investigators confirmed that Fauci and the new science adviser kept information about the research from Trump's administration. Trump himself admitted in an interview that he was not informed about most of it. Fauci has been in charge since the virus became public and has worked with his scientists, many of whom he funds, to promote the narrative that the virus is natural and not from a lab. The US intelligence community, including the Department of Defense, FBI, and Department of Homeland Security, likely played a role in this deception.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, so one thing I really want to say first is it there's this I think there's this big assumption that president Trump was aware of of everything that was going on because the gain of function ban itself was the the repeal process started. That decision was made before Trump had actually become president. And so and then Speaker 1: That's an important part this is what happened. That's an important thing for the To know that President Obama starts the repeal process of that about 2 weeks before he exits office and and Trump takes over. Sorry to interrupt you, Charles. Speaker 0: Yeah. So so basically and and Trump didn't appoint a new presidential science adviser for another 18 months. So there was a period of time during which they they restarted gain of function work that Anthony Fauci was basically working without any supervision. And he had rewritten the rules. So that way anything that he said was part of vaccine work would would just be completely passed over. So Speaker 2: So are are you saying there is a real possibility that when Trump gave these speeches and was blaming China for it, that he was kept in the dark by his own people, by his intelligence services about the involvement of the US government in this game of function research. Do you think he didn't know about it? Speaker 0: I don't think that I know that's a I know that for a fact. In fact, I postulated that 2 years ago, and then last fall, when I spoke with congressional investigators in person, they they confirmed that that was correct, that Anthony Fauci had worked with Kelvin Drugmeier, the new presidential science adviser, to keep much of the information about what it was going on or what had been going on from Trump's administration. In fact, Trump himself in an interview on Australian TV with Sherry Markson, He people didn't realize it, but he actually answered that question himself and said, yeah. We we weren't told about most of this stuff. Speaker 2: Wow. So Anthony Fauci was basically running this entire show in the background. When Trump came in, Trump was kept in the dark about what happened in Wuhan. And Anthony Fauci has basically been in charge also of everything that happened since the virus did, make it into the public, and has basically worked together with his scientists, many of whom He is funding to create this cover story that this is a natural virus, that this could not have come out of a lab. Is that right? Speaker 1: I I think that's I think that's partially true. And and the reason why it's partially true is that, whatever needs to realize is that doctor Anthony Fauci is a sub agency See director for the national National Institutes of Health. He does not have the government control power reached to get into the other agencies that would be required to pull off this kind of charade. So it's my firm belief that the US intelligence community played a large role behind the scenes from the Department of Defense. Probably not so much of the CIA, but maybe parts of the FBI, and definitely the Department of Homeland Security, to pull off this big farce. Speaker 0: Yeah. I definitely well, I just wanted to say that that that's what I was about to say is that it wasn't just him. This was This was intelligence agencies and others that had been working on this. They were helping they were they were basically working together.

@mommaleo - Jenny

@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander FAUCI lied before Congress, denying that the NIH funded Gain-Of-Function Research, when in fact he did. 𝐅𝐀𝐔𝐂𝐈 𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐝 𝐓𝐑𝐔𝐌𝐏 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐝

Video Transcript AI Summary
If COVID-19 originated from risky experiments at the Wuhan lab, it's important to note that the lab received funding from America. During a congressional hearing, Senator Paul questioned Dr. Fauci about the NIH's funding of gain-of-function research in Wuhan, to which Fauci denied lying. However, a scientific paper from 2012 written by Fauci supports the benefits of gain-of-function research despite the risk of a pandemic. The decision to lift the ban on gain-of-function research during the Trump administration remains unclear. Former President Trump mentioned that Fauci did not inform him about the Wuhan Institute of Virology's activities, and emails later revealed Fauci's discussions about the possibility of genetic manipulation. Trump stopped the payments to the Chinese lab upon discovering them. Despite the controversy, Trump believes his administration did a great job with the vaccine and Operation Warp Speed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If COVID nineteen was the result of gain of function or other risky experiments at the Wuhan lab, remember this. That same lab was being partly funded by America. Speaker 1: Doctor Fauci, knowing that it is a crime to lie to congress, do you wish to retract your statement of May 11th where you claimed that the NIH never funded gain Speaker 2: of function Search in Wuhan. Senator Paul, I have never lied before the congress, and I do not retract that statement. Speaker 1: Take an animal virus and you increase its transability to humans Right. You're saying that's not gain of function? Speaker 2: That is correct. And and, senator Paul, you do not know what you are talking about, quite frankly, and I wanna say that officially. Speaker 0: Doctor Anthony Fauci is America's top medical adviser. I found a scientific paper he wrote in 2012, where he argued the benefits of gain of function research were worth the risk of a pandemic. In total, American agencies funded see 5 research projects at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Speaker 2: So you don't wanna go to Hoboken, New Jersey or to Fairfax, Virginia to be studying the bat human interface That might lead to an outbreak, so you go Speaker 0: at all about how it happened that the gain of function ban was was lifted during the Trump administration. How was it that Anthony Fauci was able to to do this without anyone knowing? Speaker 3: Well, I I don't know for sure who all was involved in that decision making process. I can I can say this much? When we look back and figure out how that decision was made, I hope that all of those parties were able to come to the table, express their viewpoints, their concerns So that we had not only a decision, but an informed decision that was made. I've seen very little evidence to date that there was a broad based Information exchange before the decision was made by doctor Fauci to lift that ban on gain of function research. Speaker 0: Mister president Anthony Fauci, Did he ever once mention to you that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was genetically manipulating coronaviruses? Speaker 4: Well, no. He didn't. And, you know, Anthony's been in government for many, many years. He's a, a bureaucratic kind of a guy, a very great promoter. I give him An a plus as a promoter and probably a c or a d as a doctor. Speaker 0: We now know from emails that have been released under the Freedom of Information Act that he was getting his advice from the likes of Peter Dzic, a Wuhan collaborator. At the same time, he was telling you that this was a natural virus, while at the same time, behind the scenes in emails, He was having discussions about whether this might have been genetically manipulated. Does that shock you? Speaker 4: Well, he was dealing with them, And my thing was a little bit different. I just wanted to stop it. Whether it developed one way or the other, I just wanted to stop it. Speaker 0: But it's important to know where it came from. It's extremely important to know how it developed. Speaker 4: Fauci was dealing with them, and I guess they were even making payments for certain kinds of research, and I ended that too. I stopped that when we found out about that. He was doing that during the Obama years. And when I found out about it, I said, can you imagine that the United States is making payments to a Chinese lab? So just that on his face didn't make sense, but I stopped that. Speaker 0: The Obama administration did hit pause on gain of function research though, and that was lifted under your watch. Why did you allow the gain of function research to continue? Speaker 4: Well, I think probably people that worked for me looked at it, and at one point, they might have, done that. But ultimately, what we did was We shut it off. We shut the whole thing off, and we stopped making payments that were approved much earlier than our administration. Speaker 0: Do you regret now not paying closer attention? I mean, this gain of function research is extremely risky, you know, banned under the Obama administration, and then kick started in 2017 under your watch? Speaker 4: Yeah. No. I I think we've done an incredible job between the vaccine and all of the operation warp speed, I think we did Great job. And people are now starting to see what a great job we did.

@mommaleo - Jenny

@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander Wuhan Institute of Virology - A Bioweapons Lab was working with funding from the NIH. Intel? Why?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Wuhan Institute of Virology is believed by some, including the speakers, to be a bioweapons lab with Chinese Communist Party officials. The speakers suggest that the US government may have been collecting intelligence on the lab through a scientist named Peter Daszak, who had a relationship with the CIA. They propose that the US government traded advanced biotech for access to the lab. The second speaker agrees with this theory and mentions that he received leaked documents related to the lab. The Department of Defense is also mentioned.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is this is the way of the the Wuhan Institute of Virology is known to be a bioweapons laboratory by people like Charles and myself. This is it's well known. They have, Chinese Communist Party officials working in that laboratory. And if you know that this laboratory is making bioweapons, You wanna be able to get your people in there to see what's going on. So a couple weird things happen. So one, doctor Peter Daszak, asks me if he should work with the CIA one of the play at ECLOS Alliance. And then over the next few months, he tells me that the relationship is, with the CIA is progressing. So I take that to mean that he was collecting intelligence for the US government on that laboratory. That it would also make sense for the US government trying to get other spies or people into that laboratory. And I believe the contract with the Wuhan Institute of Virology for 5 or $600,000 initially, whatever was was just a mechanism for the US government to get our scientists, our people, into that laboratory to to collect, intelligence in exchange for advanced bioweapons technology. So, you know, China doesn't need $600,000 money from the United States government, which they lent to us. Right? I mean, it's sort of it's laughable when you think about it. But the thing that they did need was our our superior, biotechnology. So I think we actually traded them, advanced biotech, for access to their laboratory. That's quite an interesting theory. Charles, would you agree with that? Speaker 1: 100%. And I think that that's just like just like you, at the very beginning of this, it made no sense why we would share this technology with with China because we I used to do modeling of potential bio attacks and we we already had all of the the labs and all the nuclear reactors and any sort of potential threat that was in the WMD space. We we were already monitoring that on on the classified and unclassified side. So there was no way that we didn't know that the the Wuhan Institute of Virology had at the time the only BSL 4 lab in China, so it's it's it's comical to think otherwise. So I think he's absolutely right, And I think that the the diffuse proposal that went to DARPA was a continuation of That research which is, and if you don't know that I am the person to whom those documents were given to leak. So I'm I'm I'm very familiar with with, the background of that proposal. Speaker 0: Well at least the Department of Defense

@mommaleo - Jenny

@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander @KimDotcom makes a powerful statement I believe we all can agree with: If we don’t have the media covering the WHOLE TRUTH, we run the risk of experiencing a mass causality event. The development of AI changes everything, what dangers are we at risk of?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the potential dangers of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning in creating deadly viruses. They mention that AI has already been used to identify chemical combinations more lethal than nerve agents and explosive nanoparticles. They express concern that in a few years, it may be possible for individuals to create their own deadly viruses, leading to a mass casualty event. However, one speaker argues that the accuracy of such predictions is limited due to the quality of data and the complex dynamics of disease transmission. They suggest that a low-grade infection with long-term disability could be more catastrophic than a highly lethal virus.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Don't do something about this now. And if we don't have the media report about this truthfully and all of this being uncovered, then we will have no chance from stopping the ultimate disaster, a mass casualty event that could kill half or more of the earth population? Speaker 1: I want to disagree with you, but I can't. Speaker 2: I so some of that is actually happening already. So the machine learning artificial intelligence component of assembling viruses, That that works actually been happening for a number of years. It the the point we're not to the point where that information is then put into some kind of robotic system to then actually do the engineering on the biologic material. At least as far as I'm aware, there's always new things happening in the classified space, The US government all the time, but I haven't heard of that yet. And you know the one Speaker 0: the one and logically, right, there's no reason why I we shouldn't have that in a couple of years, you know. I mean, you can apply CRISPR, through automated means to do the work for you, just because it hasn't been built yet or we don't know about it yet, doesn't mean it will not exist in 5 years. Speaker 1: Well, there's actually a paper came out in February, I believe, Where they took a they took an AI and they had it run through alleged chemicals. They did well, basically, they gave it, They wanted them to find something that was more dangerous than a nerve agent, a chemical nerve agent. And they ran they had it run for 6 hours And it figured out 40,000 chemical combinations that were more lethal than the most dangerous nerve agent compound that we have today. And that was in 6 hours. Speaker 2: Yeah. And they did the they actually did that. They did the same thing with, explosive, nanoparticles as well. Speaker 0: I mean, isn't it this to me is more frightening than anything because you know, you cannot protect yourself against that. All it takes is a handful of people, like you said, a couple $1,000,000, the technology to advance a little bit further, maybe another 5 years, maybe if it's even already till today and you make your own Ebola, corona cocktail and literally kill half of the world's population. I mean, it's we're not far away from that possibility. Right? Speaker 2: It depends. So the the interesting thing thing about disease dynamics and And how a disease functions in in a population and depending depending whether or not zoonotic, so transmitted between animals and people. You know, the environment always has the And so, oftentimes, it and, you know, luckily, humans, we have diverse genetics too. So, it sometimes it's difficult to determine when a new novel disease and is introduced to a population of animals or people, how it will behave. So while I think the fear here is that Artificial intelligence means machine learning will create some super bug which will, decimate the planet. You know, my experience of being, not having the quantitative machine learning AI skills myself and also having the bio background is that, oftentimes these machine learning applications, it becomes a garbage in garbage out scenario because you necessarily don't have the best data going into the model to build the agent and you can't make all, all your assumptions can't be tight. So the predictive accuracy that you would actually produce a pathogen that would decimate the global population in all environmental conditions is hard to imagine. And there's other things that work against a disease. So a disease when it's, has high high lethality or violence, tends to burn out really quick, in terms of infectious disease outbreaks because It kills the host that will spread the infectious agent so quickly that other people do not come into contact With that person become infected in the 1st place. So disease transmission is very much, transmission risk in these novel pathogens is a trade off between, how virulent the pathogen is versus how, transmissible it is. Actually a low grade infection, which would make people would be deput, which may be cause a life life lifetime disability like polio Would be far more catastrophic, in my opinion, than something that would had high really high lethality.

@mommaleo - Jenny

@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander @KimDotcom FAUCI funded one a study for Ralph Baric to develop a technique called “seamless ligation” which hides the engineering of the virus by disguising the insertion sites. He taught this to the Chinese Scientists in the Wuhan Institute of Technology.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Tony Fauci funded a study by Ralph Barrick, which aimed to develop a technique called seamless litigation. This technique allows for the hiding of any traces of engineering in order to avoid detection. Dr. Fauci taught this technique to Chinese scientists, which goes against the principles of public health. Instead of ensuring transparency and accountability, this technique serves a nefarious purpose.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tony Fauci can still say, what I'm doing is for medical purposes. We're developing these things, and then we're gonna develop defenses against them. He funded 1 study that puts a lie to all of that. He funded Ralph Barrick to develop a technique called seamless litigation. And that is a technique for hiding the engineering project. Mhmm. So you could normally, when you do that kind of engineering, you can see it and you can say that A bug was created in a lab. He developed a way of hiding all traces that was developed, and he taught that to the Chinese scientist, and that you know, there is no public health. It is the opposite of what you would do If you are interested in public health, it's the opposite. If you're interested in public health, you would make sure that any kind of tampering you did like that had red flags all over it that said we made this thing. To teach it how to teach people how to hide that, it only has a nefarious purpose.

@mommaleo - Jenny

@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander @KimDotcom 🦇The Bat Lady - Shi Zhengli operated in the United States and in the Wuhan Institute of Virolgy.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Michael Pillsbury, a Chinese expert, discusses the role of "Batwoman" in the virology lab and the origins of the virus. He mentions that Batwoman, who is proud of her work, claims to have seen the virus in Wuhan after it had already been circulating for a month. However, many doubt the truthfulness of her statement. The United States has not been allowed to investigate the Wuhan lab. Dr. Pillsbury also highlights China's interest in biological warfare, which has been discussed in Chinese military books and textbooks. President Obama had asked China about their biological weapons program, but they denied any violation of the treaty. The outrage in the US stems from the belief that China could have prevented the virus from spreading globally.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Joining us tonight is doctor Michael Pillsbury, leading Chinese expert and scholar, director now of the Center For Chinese Strategy at the Hudson Institute, author of The 100 Year Marathon. Mike, good to have you with us. Let me begin with the Batwoman, and her research in the virology lab, which at one time she was conducting in the United States. Speaker 1: That's right. Speaker 0: How did we get to this point? Speaker 1: Well, first of all, Batwoman is a positive nickname. She likes it. She was profiled in Scientific American, not too long ago, a few months ago. She's very proud of being that woman. It takes considerable courage to go into as many caves as she's been into, get samples or bring the whole bat out and then do this work in this biosafety level four Laboratory. So she's at the heart of the investigation in terms of what she knows, why she was doing this. And she says that she was first shown the virus not until December 30th. So her story is, Yes, the virus is in Wuhan. Yes, she saw it, but it was after a month that it was running around Wuhan before it was brought to her. If that's true, That's very good news for China. Many people suspect it's not true, Lou. Speaker 0: Well, I think Right Now that no one knows what is exactly the case, what we have are intelligence agencies that are aligning themselves with consensus on the part of scientists, but they don't have direct evidence. And since, the beginning of Story, US doctors have not been permitted, into that laboratory to do any kind of investigation. So I would like to turn now, with that statement from her, the Wuhan Virology Research, which was disallowed by the United States. She migrated then to China to carry on her research since that point in 2014. Now we go to doctor Ho and I mean doctor General Ho who is leading the defense planning arm of the PLA and who authored a book, you know, as you have informed us previously, on the commanding heights that he sees for biowarfare, give us a sense of why we haven't had more discussion about, China's biological warfare capabilities and interests. Speaker 1: Well, president Obama in 2010, that's where the story begins, Lou. He asked the Chinese politely, Do you have a biological weapons program? He believed they were they might be in violation of a treaty That most countries in the world have signed not to develop or use biological weapons, except there's a loophole. Each country that wants to can keep a small sample possible biological weapons for reference purposes. So if you go beyond that, you're in violation of the treaty. Obama basically was turned down by the Chinese and has not been pursued more recently, But in the last, I'd say 7 or 8 years, Lou, the Chinese military began to write a lot, of books, even textbooks On this idea that the commanding heights in the future will be 3 things, cyber warfare, outer space warfare, and biological warfare. General He, whose picture you put up, he's been the leader of this. He was president of something we don't have a counterpart for it. It's called the Chinese Academy of Military Science. We think of military science as casualties or surgery, keeping people from getting yellow fever. The Chinese do all that, but they also have an offensive component to it that they write about. They shouldn't be doing this. It's against the treaty they signed. And if the inspections were carried out, they may fear That we would find something, that they're not allowed to have by treaty. I think that's the that's the sensitivity, Lou. Speaker 0: Well there are many sensitivities and there is also much outrage in this country, for the deadly virus that China unleashed on an unsuspecting world World that they could well have worn, and saved, hundreds of thousands of lives, and millions of infection.

@mommaleo - Jenny

@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander @KimDotcom D.R.A.S.T.I.C. member @MonaRahalkar on #ShiZhengli. What did we learn about her role in COVID-19?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Zengdi initially worked on the original SAS and later discovered a cave with various viruses, including bits of the Saswan virus. She spent three years researching bat coronaviruses in the Mojang mine shaft and collected around 22,000 samples, which were brought to Wuhan. The database maintained by the Wuhan Institute of Virology went offline in September 2019, raising suspicions about the pandemic's timeline. The virus was previously known as 4 991 and was deposited by Zhengli Shi in 2013. The virus originated from a mine infested with bats, where six miners contracted pneumonia. The connection between Yunnan and Wuhan became clear, leading to investigations into how the Horseshoe bat viruses reached Wuhan. The WHO's investigation focused more on zoonotic origins and lacked depth in exploring the lab origin theory. The United States and India have expressed support for further investigation into the lab origin.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So Zengdi, she was initially working on the SAS one, original SAS And in 2013 in 2013, she found a mine, she found a cave where all these different viruses you know, the they were they had, the all the, small bits and pieces of the Saswan. But when, she was working with this other mine shaft, this Mojang mine shaft, She brought she researched this particular mine for bat, coronaviruses for 3 years, And they were bringing samples to, Wuhan. Zheng Dixi, the bat woman of China, they had collected around 22,000, different Coronavirus samples originating from bats and rodents. And the database, which was maintained in WIV, it went offline in September 2019. 12 September 2019. So this was very mysterious because, The the pandemic, we thought that it began in, December. That's what China has told us, and WHO also told told us that it began in Early December. We dug out various research papers. We did some genomic, analysis, and we found out that this virus, actually and At that time, I think in April, it was already established that this virus had an older name. So what was the older name? So this virus was earlier called as 4 991, and Zhengli Shi of Wuhan Institute of Virology had deposited this virus under the name 4 991, This particular sample, this was collected in 2013, and the history about the sample was it was from a Mojang mine. So this mine had another history which, the WIP researchers had not disclosed in their primary paper. The history was that there were 6 miners or People who went to a copper mine shaft, it was infested by bats, and horseshoe bats were there in more prevalence. So, what happened was that after working in this dirty, you know, circumstances of this all this bad fecal matter in the cave, They got infected, and they got pneumonia. 1st, they got fever, then cough, and then they were restless. Right? So they got pneumonia, and they were admitted. 6 of them were admitted to the same hospital in Kunming in Yunnan. So this was one of the breakthrough because, one clue was that that this r a t g 13 was coming from the same mineshaft and the pneumonia cases also happened from the same mineshaft. So the connection between Yunnan and Wuhan, was clear that there, how, I mean, how this Horseshoe bat viruses Got into Wuhan, so that was, the through these researchers who were present in Wuhan Institute virology, who brought all these samples from such caves, and particular, their. So, basically, these people want to know more about how this virus can infect human beings. So that that is the reason why they were doing this genetic engineering experiments. So this kind of work was routinely done in Muhan Institute of Virology, and also It is being done worldwide also. So the WHO joined team. They had their news conference. They finished their study in February. 9 February, they concluded their studies. Now, what did they do? Actually, their mandate was, only basically to look at the zoonotic origins And very little emphasis, was given on the lab, origin. So they went to Wuhan Institute of Virology and few other labs, But, they did not didn't have enough time, and also, they did not go into very deep depths. Actually, I mean, unless we Investigate the lab origin theory also. I think this investigation is some incomplete. So, recently, United States has, I mean, president Joe Biden has said that they would, conduct 90 days investigation, and I think that is maybe the way forward because The CNET has agreed, to this, and everyone thinks that we should look at this, even the lab origin in very much depth. Oh, and recently, India has also supported, this particular stance. We are truthful, unafraid, and

@mommaleo - Jenny

@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander @KimDotcom @MonaRahalkar 𝚆𝚑𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚕𝚎𝚋𝚕𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛 @CharlesRixey exposed the 𝙳𝙴𝙵𝚄𝚂𝙴 𝙿𝚛𝚘𝚓𝚎𝚌𝚝 led by Peter Daszak and Ralph Baric, rejected by DARPA, funded by the NIH. This leak was called the “smoking gun” that led to finally learning the TRUTH! Thanks Charles!

Video Transcript AI Summary
The leaked DEFUSE proposal from the Wuhan Institute of Virology and their American partners reveals their risky research on the parts of COVID-19 that make it highly infectious to humans. Scientists believe this proposal provides a step-by-step guide to creating SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19. The proposal's specificity in constructing a virus with all the key hallmarks of SARS-CoV-2 is seen as more than just a coincidence. Researchers, including Shizeng Li and Ben Hu, who is considered a potential patient zero, were involved in this research. Hu's work on genetically engineering coronaviruses from bats and his early COVID-like symptoms further support the possibility of him being patient zero.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The extent of their risky research came to light in this proposal, the Wuhan Institute of Virology and their American partners drew up in search of funding. They were experimenting with the parts of COVID nineteen that scientists find so unusual. It's what makes the virus so infectious to humans. This proposal was leaked by a whistleblower. Why do many scientists consider this grant proposal a blueprint for SARS CoV-two. Speaker 1: The DEFUSE proposal really provides step by step Instructions for how a scientist might create SARS CoV 2, the virus that causes COVID nineteen. Speaker 0: Justin Kinney is an associate professor at New York's Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. His lab is at the forefront of data driven research into the virus that causes COVID nineteen. Speaker 1: To me and many other scientists, the diffuse proposal is the smoking gun. This is not something you would get from Just any virology lab working on coronaviruses. This is a very specific Blueprint for making SARS CoV-two. The fact that researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology explicitly proposed Constructing viruses that would have all the key hallmarks of SARS CoV-two is just a remarkable Coincidence if in fact it is a coincidence. Speaker 0: Those researchers include bat lady, Shizeng Li, and her colleague, Ben Hu, who many consider to be patient 0. Is he patient 0, Ben Hu? Speaker 1: I would say that a researcher working on novel SARS like coronaviruses from natural bat populations And genetically engineering them to be more dangerous in humans would be a prime candidate for patient 0. So that combined with reports that he and others at the Wuhan Institute of Virology came down with COVID like symptoms very early on, you know, before The outbreak at the Huanan Seafood Market, to me, It is strong circumstantial evidence that Ben Hu might be patient 0.

@mommaleo - Jenny

A senior-level CIA officer told House committee leaders that his agency tried to pay off six analysts who found SARS-CoV-2 likely originated in a Wuhan lab if they changed their position and said the virus jumped from animals to humans, according to a letter sent Tuesday to CIA Director William Burns.

@mommaleo - Jenny

@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander @KimDotcom @MonaRahalkar @CharlesRixey Top Chinese Whistleblower Exposes COVID-19 As An Unrestricted Warfare #Bioweapon

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Li-Meng Yan, a Chinese virologist, discusses the concept of "unrestricted bioweapons" and how China's strategies extend beyond traditional bioweapons. She claims that COVID-19 is an unrestricted bioweapon designed to spread globally and that China has engaged in scientific misinformation and information warfare. Dr. Yan also criticizes the World Health Organization (WHO) for covering up the origins of the virus and accuses China of infiltrating and manipulating American scientists and organizations. She emphasizes the need for policymakers to understand the evil tactics of the Chinese Communist Party and to hold them accountable. Dr. Yan also expresses concerns about the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi, Alex. This is a good question. Unrestricted means, at what I said, no constraints, no consideration of humanity. So China's unrestricted strategies not only applied on bioweapon. COVID nineteen is their unrestricted bioweapon. But as I defend in my reports, there are also unrestricted scientific misinformation, And also there are unrestricted informative wars as we say we were censored and also misinformation spreading anywhere everywhere. They are not happy with me, and the China government doesn't happy with me. That's why they are hunting me, and they are using propaganda to smear me, just to describe me as some hamster keeper or some mire, which is very hilarious. But I have evidence. I have showed the scientific and intelligence evidence here. Since I start to tell people that There would be, there would be pandemic if you don't encounter it in time on 19th January last year. At that time, I'm the only person tell it to the world, and the China know I'm the insider because I tell the world human to human transmission exists, And, also, this is not from the seafood market. There is no animal intermediate host. I told people that WHO is covering up with China. There will be strong very end in the future if not. And, also, that day, 19th January, last year, I told people that this is a product from Chinese military lab by game of function engineering. It's not from some bad cave in somewhere in China. It is hatched by the PLA, People's Liberation Army, and then the Study because we don't know how many functions hidden in this virus. Tell your policy makers that is It's strictly the power weapon. They need to update the outcomes, and also they need to understand that to change America, to control America and also control the world, you don't have much Time, you have to understand how evil CCP is and not listen to them, not trusted them, and you have to defend to protect America and your next generations. Speaker 1: You know where the CIA tunes in. Right? You know Speaker 2: where the Russians tune in? You know everybody tunes in. Right? Know who Tucker Carlson tunes into and Speaker 1: Joe Rogan, Elon Musk? You know where Speaker 2: they tune in. Right? Speaker 1: They tune in right here. Infowars, tomorrow's news, today. Welcome back. We are now into hour number 3 of this August 30th Monday broadcast, and we are joined by a leading Chinese virologist who has been totally and completely vindicated. She's come out in the latest article in New York Post as Fauci emails verify her Wuhan lab leak claim. Li Mingyan is the doctor, and she's written a detailed report that has been proven to be a blueprint of what really happened. She's on Twitter At doctor Li Ming Yan one. People should be sure and follow her there at doctor Li, l I, Ming Yan one, And we can put that up on screen there. That is for you. She also has link up there. Her report, SARS CoV 2 is an unrestricted Bioweapon, a truth revealed through uncovering a large scale organized scientific fraud. And it would take me an hour to go over her whole bio, but let me just read part of it. Doctor Li Mingyan is a medical doctor, PhD virologist, independent coronavirus expert. She Was educated at 2 top medical schools in China, Southern Medical University and Central South University. She was also a postdoctoral fellow in the School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, because of her extensive, professional network and scientific evidence, doctor Yan Has the distinction of being the only Chinese insider in the West with firsthand knowledge about the true nature of the virus as well as the CCP's deceptive methods Use of the skies, their international bioweapons research. Since escaping from Hong Kong on April 28, 2021, she has been interviewed many, many times, 4 times by the FBI, including the FBI virologist, and each time she has been deemed credible. Doctor Yan has spent 5 years researching influenza vaccines when in January 2020, she was asked to investigate the Wuhan Pneumonia that was sweeping the city, And then it goes on from there. She can tell you the rest of the story about the CCP and and and what she witnessed And what unfolded. So, doctor Yan, thank you so much for coming on with us. Speaker 0: Thank you, Alex. Thank you for having me. Speaker 1: Every time I see on Fox or Newsmax, you get about 5 minutes. You've got the rest of the hour. You're gracious to be here. We got, like, 8 minutes to break. Start at the beginning or or or or or or or give us a summation. Whatever you'd like to tell us, we wanna get it on record. We really appreciate you Coming on because we know that you've been right from the very, very beginning, and we appreciate your courage. Speaker 0: Thank you, Alex. Then how about we start to talk about the Intellectual, reports from Biden's administration, which was released amongst the Friday on origin of COVID nineteen. How about we start talk from that? Speaker 1: Absolutely, please. Speaker 0: Okay. So according to that report, Biden administration said they judged that this COVID nineteen virus was not designed as a bioweapon. And, also, the intelligence agencies all think there is a more confidence that it is not bioengineered, lab products. So, actually, I think there are many media I mean, almost all the media try to claimed this report, but they actually made some misunderstanding because although they claim that this is not done as a bioweapon, it is not wrong, because the recent evidence verified my report and my evidence that the COVID nineteen virus is not designed as traditional bioweapon, it is designed as unrestricted bioweapon. This term is beyond bioweapon, without constraints and without considering of humanity to make the novel non traditional bioweapon and mix it with authoritarianism to conquer their, conquer their goal of making China great and also overcome the world. Everything is under the instruction of Marxism. So this is what we should let more people know, because the outcome of foul weapon has its limitation, And the China government learned how to take advantage of the weakness from the mouse and from the surveillance, and then to get a void of the surveillance and the biodefense system all over the world to conduct this biowe attack. Speaker 1: Wow. That is powerful information. So work obviously, they work with collaborators in the West. I think that's Very clear. You go off what you know about China, what you know about the weapon, but I have clips we'll play later of doctor Peter Daszak that ran the program with Fauci And with the Chinese government, and he was bragging in in December of 2019 that they were merging 5 viruses. They were gonna make a vaccine for it, and he describes COVID nineteen. So, they weren't even hiding a lot of this, it looks like. Speaker 0: Yes. From last February, since Peter Daszak start to publish his Lancet statement, claimed that COVID nineteen is from nature, and also said China has done great job in anti COVID nineteen they already exposed. At that time, I also had the firsthand that information that he tried to organize the scientists all over the world to help China. Is not a nonsense. Doctor. Fauci is not a nonsense. Ralph Barrick, Christine Anderson, All these people are not a nonsense, but, sadly, they are used by Chinese government as a tool. The Chinese Communist Party spent decades, which is approved by my recent document from 1990s, they start to study the novel things in about weapon and the about war program. And the people from America, they are used by China to spread misinformation. They don't, they are not allowed to touch the core intelligence, in China because Chinese Communist Party don't trust these foreigners, but they are used and they enjoy it. And they say the benefits. So they are willing to do that with China to undermine America, to on the mind of the world. Speaker 1: And they're certainly working with the UN and Tedders and working with leftists here who wanna keep us locked down, who Who wanna bring in a communist revolution, who wanna create a universal income. I mean, the the Democrats now admit most health department leaders Are a a vowed communist, not just Tedros, but others that run London and run all these other big cities. They say, we're communist. We don't want the lockdown to ever end in the west. So, clearly, they're using it as a smokescreen, for martial law. Speaker 0: The mandate is very useful because compared to America, China has the power to mandate everything, and they predicted that once such novel biowulfaire or bioterrorism happen, Pee, people in America cannot get enough help, I mean, in time because this is Democratic country, and in China, they can control it because that is centralized. And also To use mandate as a tool to divide American, divide, republican, democratic people, Divide the races, divide your policy is what China spend decades to work on. Speaker 1: Incredible. Doctor Lee Ming Yan, stay right there. Is the best place for people to find you on Twitter at doctorleemingyan1? Speaker 0: Yes. And there are hundreds of fake accounts established by CCP, so please notice that it's over 100 k Account is the only right one. Speaker 1: Alright. Wow. I've got a lot I wanna cover. When we come back, what do you wanna get into next? Speaker 0: We want to tell people that about how China's plan to undermine America and also control the organizations like WHO, UNF for years, and then makes a whole misinformation helping COVID nineteen pandemic. Speaker 1: Alright. You're an amazing lady. Totally vindicated. The Pentagon and others came out and said, yes. Her report was correct. It came out of the Wuhan lab with a high probability. We'll be right back. Stay with us on the other side. Doctor Li Ming Yan is our guest. She is Completely vindicated. She was one of the 1st voices to come out early last year and say it's a bioweapon out of Wuhan. The Chicom's have co opted People inside the US government, inside the UN, and now she's been vindicated. The US intelligence agencies have come out, and even John Hopkins that came up with The SPARS event 4 years ago, wargaming, what's currently happening now, heavily involved in all this as well. This is a global government project. China is at the heart of it, obviously. They've come out and attacked her and said, oh, it didn't come out of a lab. We've had Peter Daszak who helped secretly write the Lancet report saying it didn't come out of the lab, but told people in emails, don't tell people I'm involved writing this. He's finally been fired off of the latest whitewash. So they have worked around the clock to try to stop doctor Jan, but she is with us now, and, going over why this happened, where this is going, and I also wanna ask you because you've been on top of this like nobody else, How do you counter something like this? Because when you say unrestricted warfare, unrestricted bioweapon, Explain what that means. It it doesn't mean you just spray it on your enemy. You just release it out of the open because you're premeditated. You know what your response is gonna be, you believe it'll divide and conquer and destroy open free societies, which she then our media even advertised and said, oh, America and Europe can't be free anymore. We've gotta be like China. We've gotta have a social credit score. We've gotta listen to them. So we even saw the PR prepared. And as Americans and others got censored And as you got censored, I saw communist Chinese propaganda force fed by big tech. Speaker 0: Hi, Alex. This is a good question. Unrestricted means, at what I said, no constraints, no consideration of humanity. So China's unrestricted strategies not only applied on bioweapon. COVID nineteen is the unrestricted bioweapon. But as I defend in my reports, There are also unrestricted scientific misinformation, and also there are unrestricted informative wars John Hopkins, and also doctor Fauci. So my evidence actually based on my firsthand intelligence from China Military and the civil network, involve house detail, CDC, and also research maps. Also involve my knowledge about the WHO experts who work with me in the WHO reference lab in Hong Kong for 5 years. And, also, there are other evidence, like the People's Liberation Army's document, scientific evidence they publish from military and also civilian scientist network working with China, all together combined with my expertise, and In the new evidence it is a document from People's Liberation Army from end of 2014. That one is written by the leading bio expert, in the military of, medical science academy in China, that team work with general Wei Chen who pick in Take, in charge of Wuhan Lab, March of February. I think definitely people know that. So this team actually focus on establishing the theory of the unrestricted bioweapon strategies for CCP, especially for Chairman Xi. And in that book, they claim that to divide America is very important, because in their strategy, America is the primary, enemy for them because America doesn't allow the dictatorship, or communism, and there is freedom in America, so they found out that they need to understand the policies, politicals and think tanks from America, and for example, they take the example that NIH, especially NIAID, And the Johns Hopkins, they are the organizations in the US to help surveillance about weapon related risk. That's why China knows if they can manipulate the top experts in this organization, then they can manipulate the information and the American policymakers. And now you say what happened now. Speaker 1: Well and and at least the FBI did arrest the head of Harvard Science who was basically on the payroll of the Chinese giving him a lot of this technology. So clearly, you've got Bill Gates that helped open up China. You've got Fauci that's a a a a communist Chinese supporter. They're getting all this power. They're getting all this control, and Fauci bragged 2017, Trump will be challenged by a novel virus. And then, of course, we'll play it next segment, Daszak bragging about how they were preparing it And, getting it ready, I think, to cover his butt later when he knew it would come out. They aren't very happy with you, though, are they? The I don't think they expected all this to come out. Speaker 0: They are not happy with me, and the China government isn't happy with me. That's why they are hunting me, and they are using propaganda to smear me just to describe me as some hamster keeper or some liar, which is very hilarious. But I have evidence. I have shown the scientific and intelligence evidence here. Since I start to tell people that there would be, there would be pandemic if you don't count your egg in time on 19th January last year. At that time, I'm the only person tell it to the world, and the China know I'm the insider because I tell the world human to human transmission exists, And, also, this is not from the seafood market. There is no animal intermediate host. I told people that Have the HOA is covering up with China? There will be strong very end in the future, if not. And, also, that day, 19th January, I told people that this is a product from Chinese military lab by game of function engineering. It's not from some bad cave in somewhere in China. It is patched by the PLA, People's Liberation Army, and then modified did a lot of gain of function modification, which still need our to study because we don't know how many functions hidden in this virus. So these are all verified. That's why They don't wanna me talk about it, and that's why they wanna censor all the people that talking about that. Speaker 1: Wow. Doctor Li Ming yan is our guest. Again, you can follow her on her real Twitter. We'll put it on screen for TV viewers. I'll give it to you next segment, but, while we come back, let's look. Then I want you to get some time to talk about your research, what's in your paper, and how you could look at the virus and know it was manmade, which is now confirmed. These all these viruses combined, how they did it, what really won. They shut the lab down for weeks. We know no cell phone activity right before the outbreak was announced. So as best you can tell, was it done on purpose? I think you're saying it was, you know, versus them saying, oh, it happened on accident. I look at the timing. I look at the media working with, The dictator of China, I mean, I see it all. It was clearly premeditated, and they told us 15 days to flatten the curve. And now here we are still under lockdown, around the world. It is incredible. We'll be right back. Everybody listening on AM and FM, tell folks tune in. Everybody watching on TV or the Internet, you're how we expand the audience and people get the truth. Tell them whistleblower scientist who went to Wuhan and researched it, that first exposed it And risk to her life is on now telling us what's really happening. This is so important. Stay with us. Well, authoritarians all Over the world love using this virus and the fear of it to lock down society, and then to bring us these vaccines. I'm gonna ask Her view on those as well, but the great part here on The Alex Jones Show about my job is that I don't care about Hollywood stars. I don't care about sports icons. I care about trailblazers and interesting people and people that Tell the truth and and stand up and do what's right. Like, when I remember over in Asia where they had the big cave cave in with all the school kids in it, and The divers would go in and say them 1 by 1. Those are heroes. Those were interesting people. I'd like to interview them. And then you've got somebody like doctor Li Ming Yan who Puts out the 1st paper, was there, was an expert, went and investigated it for a university, came back, documented it, And has now been vindicated. That that that's a hero. And I know she doesn't see herself as a hero, but it's people like her that are gonna turn the tide against this evil. So we got another 25 minutes left. I'd love for you to be able to go anywhere you want, but it's probably important for you to go back to the time Of your scent to investigate and then how you know this was staged, how you know it was chimeric, which they now admit. It it's like saying a Swiss watch Puts itself together in the desert from sand, and the idea that from reading your paper that's now been proven right, it's preposterous to claim Five different species of animal jumped millions of years of, quote, evolution or whatever, and then magically made this this chimera. Then after your report came out, The Indians and the Australians and others scanned the virus and said you could see the insertion genes and how it had been Made. So so you're the virologist. You're the renowned doctor that first broke this. Walk us through how you knew it was manmade. Speaker 0: By my supervisor, doctor Liu Peng, on behalf of WHO reference map in Hong Kong to understand what happened in Wuhan, on 31st December 2019. So at that time, China government blocked all the information even to the experts. So my access to China CDC, To the doctors and researchers, a over China gave me the quick, intelligence collection, and that tell us that China knows there is outbreak, and China was hiding this information. And then later on, the response from WHO shows that They compromise with China government and hide aid and check to the audience check the public together with Chinese Communist Party Speaker 1: And you were the 1st to say that you were the 1st to say that when it was called the Wuhan, pneumonia. And just to be clear, it's all been proven that you're right. The UN did actively cover it up. Speaker 0: Yes. They act actually, they covered up. And then more than covered up, They join into this kind of man, although they cannot catch the real secret, but they actually may deliver the technology and also help China to escape from the punishment. And, also, these are well planned by Chinese Communist Party since 20 years ago. And then, what I want to help you about is my research from last January shows that China actually tried to, frame some animal. For example, dog. They tried to frame it. They try to make people start this as a wild animal, which carry this kind of virus and transmit to human from the seafood market, which is totally fine. You see, until now, they cannot find the animal, and, actually, From mid January when I was in Hong Kong, I had started email from some expert to my map that you better focus on the raccoon dog, and it implies that you find the raccoon dog from Wuhan, But at that time, I reveal it through Buddhist media in Chinese on YouTube, which actually triggered Chinese Communist Party and the chairman Xi's office, that's why they have to change their strategies and get avoid of more deaths, and also more damning. Somehow, they still do that. Speaker 1: Well, I agree with you. The communist China quarterback this, and it's the heart of the New World Order, but clearly worked with Western criminals. You can see the scripting. But what do you make of Obama When when the media made a big deal of this in 2015 at Chapel Hill, North Carolina and when Fauci had it moved to Wuhan, I mean, clearly, there's major involvement with Obama and the globalist here as well. Because China Oh. The the the communist, as you know, threatened back and said, If you blame us, we'll blame you. So I think that's why they did a joint operation so they could blame each other. Speaker 0: Because China had infiltrated America for many years. They have their military civil infiltration, and that's why they can compromise and manipulate and cancels, concussion. Some of your many of your scientists or the officers to work with them. Speaker 1: So you're saying many of them are in collusion? Speaker 0: Yes, exactly, and that also has explained in the evidence I obtained. For example, they talked about that From 2005, bioweapon convention conference in Geneva told that All will be the surveillance organization for bioweapon. Speaker 1: Sure. So China working through them with Gates set up how to respond so they could release it and then cover it up. What do you make of event two zero one and all this? Frantic governments at John Hopkins and the Chinese government frantically drilling For this happening in the months right before it happened, I see that as them preparing and getting ready and getting their people all trained. Speaker 0: These people, they bring the Chinese sort of, academic spies came here, and also many innocent Chinese people are blackmailed by our government to deliver the technology back to China. And the American scientists, like in John Hawkins Or in lab, or New York Blood Center, which is very important because people can access American people's gene data, Genetic data from there are all helping I mean, many of them are helping China government to work on these things. They deliver these things back to China, and then they exchange for benefits. Like, they get promotion. They are Stand into the international organization, like Food and Agriculture Organization, World Animal Organization, WHO Sure. Look at the head of Harvard scientist. China. Speaker 1: The the Chinese government gave him millions of secret money. Speaker 0: Yes. Yes. I mean, that is just Piece of the iceberg, the amount of this China's massive infiltration in America actually didn't triggered among because China study your mouth. They study your policies. They know how to disguise aid and get a wide of This kind of surveillance and Speaker 1: all of that. Societies, all of it, doctor Li Meng Yan. How do we counter this? How do we respond to this? Speaker 0: Tell your policy makers that is unrestricted about weapons. They need to update the outcomes, And also, they need to understand that misinformation is another arm for this novel, nontraditional bioweapon. Together, this is SACEP's unrestricted strategies to change America to control America and also controls the world. You don't have much time. You have to understand how evil CCP is and not listen to them, not Trust the them, and you have to defend to protect America and your next generations. Speaker 1: Powerfully said. Please continue, doctor. Speaker 0: It's not a layman accident. This aid, because of their reckless operation, their trial in the neighborhood using Chinese people, then get out of control and make the local outbreak, and then they take advantage of that outbreak to spread it all over the world because this unrestricted bioweapon is designed to spread the pandemic all over the world. Speaker 1: You're a 100% right, because I can see all the prescripting. It's like a new Chevy truck's coming out or a new Coca Cola. It's just, oh, the bio attacks coming. Give me your rights up when it does, and all the drills And all the preparation and then Obama working with, Xi Jinping, and then it all happens, and then China's good and we're bad, and then, oh, just 14 days and then it's forever. We're gonna talk about how to counter this and doctor Peter Daszak and the smoking gun with our amazing guests, and I'm gonna host some into the next hour to take your calls, folks. Stay with us. Welcome back. Final segment with our incredible guests. I hope that all listeners realize that This interview's already got a couple 1000000 people watching live, but it'll be archived at man.video and freeworldnews.tv, And I'm just begging you for all our own futures to get the interview and to share it everywhere you can, especially your email and text message, Some of the final places not being totally censored. Doctor Li Meng Yan is on with us. Hopefully, she'll join us again to get even into more, but she wanted to get into the communist Chinese party surveillance system, and then I wanted to get this latest article where she says Fauci's emails vindicate her. Well, she's already been vindicated. I've read the emails where he's, like, telling him in December of 2019, get the vaccine ready. So clearly, this whole thing's been a plan. It's sick. So, doctor, please continue. Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. Since you talk about the vaccine, I really want to tell people, I work in the WHO lab, and I have my influenza universal vaccine Patent unpending, I'm not anti vaccine, but I'm anti vaccine mandate, and, also, I'm anti unsafe and an inefficient vaccine because this is Chinese Communist Party's unrestricted bioweapon, and especially in their spike protein of this virus, DCAP has, designed many functions, which they learn from, like, Dengue data and Ebola and the high pathogen, even influenza, all these things, and put them in to the coronavirus. It's like playing Michael, and then make you have moldy taste. That's why we still have amount of symptoms, like, Homer, like the brain fog, like you, start to get, like, disorder in China purposely done it using their expertise, using their talk technology. Speaker 2: By the Speaker 1: way, some people say it's not real, but we know it's a 5 virus Chimera, and it's it seems to me what I've seen is since it mutated, it's much worse this year. Because I talked to doctors. I got my ear to the ground. Last year, they were overblowing it at least here, but but now they're not overblowing it. This I mean, I I've got I know people personally Who, like, have basically Alzheimer's since they got it. Totally sharp 3 weeks ago. Don't know who they are now. Can't taste, can't smell, And are basically half dead. I mean so I definitely know this is real. Speaker 0: Yeah. Mike, the blood clot and also antibody dependent enhancement and also neurotoxicity on and also autoimmune disorder. All these are I mean, well studied by those military and civil scientist in China Speaker 1: So how many viruses is it combined, doctor? Is is am I correct to say 5? Some say 6. Speaker 0: Oh, I won't say like that. I will tell you that China studies about terrorism reagent in the east from America, Europe and also Russia, and that the folks on studying of this reagent, which can lead the bioterrorism, but they work directly, use aid, like direct copy paste to the coronavirus. They learn the mechanism, and they try to manage to make this mechanism happen on coronavirus. Some worked, some failed, but somehow, finally, it become like the Frankenstein, and that is what they have. They have knowledge, and they start still studying for other things. Speaker 1: So you're saying they created a Frankenstein, a Frankenstein monster, and, regardless, they created it, and it got out of the lab. It's now terrorizing the countryside. So so let me ask you this. Obviously, I know vaccines are real science. They get contaminated. They have side effects. There's problems. I don't even see these mRNA as a vaccine because it's it's it's it's it's alive, and it makes the body create the spike protein. So you are a virologist. You study this. What do you make of of of the the reports of deaths and problems and people not being protected by this vaccine? Speaker 0: First, I want to say that, yeah, we encourage the new technology, but we also need data, To to now SARS 2, we don't have the real efficient vaccines for over almost 20 years, And suddenly, within several months, they put it to market, and then, again, they start to mandate people to use that. And the very clear scenario since AIDS, the vaccine cannot stop transmission. Then why do you mandate people? Because As they claimed, if this vaccine can really reduce the severity and the death from the COVID nineteen, then it is a personal choice, unless it can prevent transmission. If not, there is no reason you have to force people to get it. Speaker 1: And and I know that, doctor. You're you're you're amazing. Let me play a clip from doctor Peter Daszak in December of 2019 when he had been dispatched. We're the 1st to investigate this. Here he is covering his butt, Doing an interview saying, oh, we combined 5 viruses to make a vaccine, admitting basically gain a function here at Speaker 3: But if you you're saying these are diverse, coronaviruses, and you can't vaccinate against them and no antivirus, what what do we What do we do? Speaker 2: Well, so I I think that coronavirus is a pretty good I mean, urophrologists, you know all this stuff, but they you can, manipulate them in the lab pretty easily. It's just Spike protein drives a lot of what happens within coronavirus, zoonotic risk. So you can get the sequence, you can build the Protein. And we work with Ralph Barrick at UNC to do this. Insert into backbone of another virus Right. And do do some work in the lab. So you can Get more predictive when you find a sequence. You got this diversity. Now the the logical progression for vaccines is If you're gonna develop a vaccine for SARS Mhmm. People are gonna use, you know, pandemic SARS. Yeah. Speaker 3: Sure. Speaker 2: Sure. But let's try and insert some of these other Yeah. Related and and get a better vaccine. Speaker 3: And I guess also knowledge of what's there. If you see something emerging, it'd give a head start on making A vaccine or a therapeutic? Speaker 2: That's true. And and, you know, better knowledge of where they are as well so you can you can Put your money into these clinics that matter. And that's one of the big things that we've been trying to push. There's a lot of, The word predict or the word, you know, the, anticipating forecasting pandemics, it it doesn't mean you can stop them. That's the problem. There's so so what we're trying to say on a global scale, if we can show where they most like to come from, the species they most like to originate in, The people most like to get affected, a global actor like WHO or a national, government can better allocate resources to the highest risk. Speaker 1: Okay. So he just admitted, doctor, that they are merging the viruses together exactly what they did. I have another clip of him Admitting Chinese colleagues develop killer coronaviruses at Wuhan. What do you make of those admissions? And then his boss, Fauci, tells congress no such thing was done. Speaker 0: Peter Daseke is more about the politician, and he's a dishonest politician than scientist. And this virus is not only designed in Wuhan. It is released in Wuhan, but it is designed and worked within the mid grade lab network from Beijing to Hong Kong to Wuhan to Habak all over China. I mean, if only folks on Wuhan, that is definitely cannot solve any problem of their bioweapon unrestricted bioweapon program. And, also, already admit that it's easy to manipulate the spike proteins. And because he's not a good scientist, though his description is very simple, but China has made it more comprehensive because The unrestricted weapon, according to CCP's definition, has to look like from nature. And that's why they can't help him up. Oh, it's from nature. It's mysterious, and we have to Get money from America, get help to, look for, like, another 10 years to find the why it happened, and then people will forget The origin is the CCP, is the military Speaker 1: Exactly. And and the CCP and their globalist allies are getting total power and control, Making 100 of billions off the vaccines in response to it, they need to be held accountable or their whole agenda will keep rolling forward. That's why your work and senator Rand Paul's work And others is so central, and the whole world is counting on what you and and senator Paul and others are doing. I mean, we were hit with a bioweapon. China is now superior, taking over the world economy. We're still partially shut down. They've given us leaky bad vaccines. We are literally, under attack, do you agree that we should see Fauci criminally investigated and, Bill Gates and others? Because we can't get Xi Jinping right now, but Couldn't we start with their with his minions, here in America? Speaker 0: Yeah. Of course. Because these people are in America. They are American Citizens, though, you're most I mean, applied to them, and they have to listen to that. But China, they can try to get rid of that. That's why the policy makers, the legislators need to understand China's unrestricted evil tactics and fix this problem. And Xi Jinping is the 1 dominant by himself, and the whole Chinese Communist Party need to be How held accountable. Speaker 1: Alright. Everybody should follow you on Twitter, doctor Lee Ming Yeon. We really appreciate you. Please come up back again to impart more amazing knowledge. Thank you so much. Speaker 0: Miss, hi, Jess. Thank you. Speaker 1: Wow. That was powerful. Great job the producers getting her. What an amazing lady and not sharing 5 minutes of her, Getting to hear 45 minutes of her on air. Please get her back as soon as you can. Crew. Wow. With all the craziness going on in the world, It's more important than ever to protect our bodies. And infowarsstore.com has a line of high quality products have the very best ingredients for your body, for your body's natural defenses, for your immune system, for every cellular function that happens in these bodies that God gave us. And we've been sold out for months months months months Thank god they're finally back in. But because of new COVID lockdowns around the world, we're already having problems Securing future orders. So I would take action now and get these great products at infowarsstore.com that you see in front of me because It also funds the InfoWar, and you don't know you'll be able to get them again. Vitamineral fusion has become probably our number 1 or 2 bestseller. It varies each month between x two because it's got all the vitamins, all the minerals that are essential, and a bunch of t amino acids, And it's all natural, and it tastes great. It's wonderful for children. It's excellent for adults, but especially old people because older folks have trouble absorbing vitamin whether in pill form, this is in powder form. So, again, you get a much better absorption rate because you drink it in the mouth. It mixes with saliva that begins the digestion process, and then, again, It's liquefied in the gut, and you get almost a 100% absorption rather than just maybe 20, 30, 40% absorption depending on the studies you see out there, with the caplets. I mean, some of the vitamins minerals are great because they're in powder forms. You still get good absorption, but nothing like when it's in powder form, first put into water that you then drink. So the final mineral fusion is back in stock, 33% off at infowarsstore.com, and it funds the Infowar. Then, of course, we have our pure turmeric concentrate formula, very similar to bodies, a very strong Turmeric concentrate, it's discounted. Infowarsstore.com. That's great for inflammation, great for immune system x two, the crystal iodine. We've got, Living Defense. We got the palm and block. We've got the new toothpaste. All of it back in stock. When I say new toothpaste, we had our original tooth whitening, silver toothpaste that we, had to discontinue, but we had already come out with a new charcoal activated toothpaste that had gotten very popular. But it had been Almost 7 months since we had it, these are supply chain breakdowns. It is now back in stock. Also, hit infowarsstore. With all the essential oils with also the activated charcoal, mouthwash with essential oils as well. So all of these products are back in stock, and they fund the info war. So I thank you all for shopping with us. I thank you all for supporting us, and it's a smart move, for yourself and your body And your immune system, your health, and if your friends and family aren't aware of how this stuff is so important and needed, it's also a great gift to give, the gift of life, the gift health. And, again, it funds the tip of the spear at a critical time in the fight against the globalist. They're all available right now, discounted at infowarsstore.com. Thank you so much for your support.

@mommaleo - Jenny

CIA analysts were bribed to change their mind about a lab leak. A major zoonotic origin advocate was Adrienne Keene, a WHO spy and Director for Global Health Security in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. An obvious conflict of interest. John Ratcliffe, Former Director of ODNI says he and Pompeo BOTH were confident it was a lab leak.

Video Transcript AI Summary
CIA analysts who supported the lab leak theory were allegedly bribed to change their stance, diverting attention from China and the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Adrian Keane, head of global health security at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, was reportedly promoting the natural origin narrative while having a history with the World Health Organization. Keane's potential conflict of interest remains undisclosed. The ODNI stated they followed intelligence community standards, but former ODNI director John Ratcliffe believes a lab leak is highly likely. Those with access to extensive intelligence, including Ratcliffe and Secretary Pompeo, agree that a lab leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology is the most probable cause of COVID-19.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: CIA analysts who favored the lab leak theory were bribed to change their position. The reason to take the focus off China and the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Over at the office of The director of National Intelligence, Adrian Keane, who's in charge of global health security, was also understood to be pushing the natural origin narrative. We can now exclusively reveal that in a clear conflict of interest, she has a history working with the World Health Organization. Speaker 1: I had found out that, apparently, she was an outside adviser also, To the World Health Organization, they are a political agency, they're a UN agency. It's just not appropriate To, to do work for a foreign power, and that would include the United Nations. She was, I believe, an advocate For, for zoonosis, but she was very involved in, discrediting the information that we were trying to present to the secretary of state. Speaker 0: Adrian Keane and the ODNI, the peak intelligence body in the US, didn't answer my questions about whether Keane had disclosed this conflict of interest. Instead, they sent this statement saying they'd complied with all of the intelligence community's analytics standards including objectivity. Former director of the ODNI, John Ratcliffe, says there's a very strong Essman, that this was a lab leak. Speaker 2: Well, listen. The the people that had access to, the most access to the most intelligence, including myself and secretary Pompeo, are telling you that the most likely origin of of COVID nineteen of the Wuhan virus was what happened was a lab leak at Wuhan Institute of Virology. So all of the people that had access to the most data, the most intelligence will all tell you the same thing that this is really most what happened, and it's more than just a possibility. It's certainly a probability, and it's probably a certainty.

@mommaleo - Jenny

Those privy to the most intel, believed the lab leak theory: ODNI Director, John Ratcliffe. A key witness for the FBI was vaccinologist, Dr. Zhou Yusen was working on a vaccine for coronaviruses in Wuhan, and applied for mRNA vaccine patents as early as October 2019, shortly after he, was found dead. Intelligence agencies believe foul play, perhaps killed, by the People’s Liberation Army, or CCP.

Video Transcript AI Summary
According to the speaker, including himself and Secretary Pompeo, the most likely origin of COVID-19 was a lab leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. They claim that this is not just a possibility, but a probability and possibly a certainty. The FBI has been cultivating a crucial witness, Dr. Zhou Yousen, a close relative of a Chinese military scientist who worked at the institute. Dr. Zhou published a patent for a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, suggesting he started working on it no later than October 2019. However, he was found dead shortly after. While it is possible that he was killed by the People's Liberation Army for accidentally starting COVID-19, there is no evidence to support this claim. The Proximal Origins authors have been approached for comment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Listen. The the people that had access to, the most access to the most intelligence, including myself and secretary Pompeo, are telling you that the most likely origin of of COVID nineteen of the Wuhan virus was what happened was a lab leak at the Wuhan to the virology. So all of the people that had access to the most data, the most intelligence will all tell you the same thing that this is really most likely what happened. And it's more than just a possibility. It's certainly a probability, and it's probably a certainty. Speaker 1: Perhaps one reason they're so adamant is because of a crucial witness the FBI has been cultivating Over the past 2 years, it's a close relative of a Chinese military scientist who worked With the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Speaker 2: He's published almost 60 papers, just on his study of SARS, and He was a professional, vaccinologist, meaning is that his study was focused on vaccines. Speaker 1: His name, doctor Zhou Yousen. Speaker 2: One of the things that we recognized very early in our study of this was he was one of the first individuals to publish a patent for a SARS CoV two vaccine. Speaker 1: So where does that take the time frame back to? Where would Zhou Yusein have had to start working on His vaccine for COVID nineteen. Speaker 2: No later than October of 2019. That's what our assessment is, and it's based on the fact that to do what he was trying to do, that's that's about the time that he had to start. And and and interesting enough, he published papers that described the process that he used to do that. Speaker 1: Doctor Zhou Yusein is thought to have begun working on a vaccine for SARS CoV two No later than October 2019. In a mysterious turn of events, just months After this crucial discovery, he was found dead. Intelligence agencies suspect foul play. What do you think about this statement? Joe Youssaint may have been killed by the People's Liberation Army For accidentally starting COVID nineteen? Speaker 2: It's certainly possible. We consider that as a plausible possibility. However, we had no evidence to make that assessment. Speaker 1: The Proximal Origins authors have been approached for comment and to appear on this program

@mommaleo - Jenny

Legitimate conversations were stifled surrounding the lab leak and through FOIA requests, former Head of British Intelligence-MI6, Sir Richard Dearlove found that the culprit, was Anthony #FAUCI. John Ratcliffe, head of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, who oversees 18 intelligence agencies, found NO EVIDENCE to back Fauci up.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the investigation into the origins of COVID-19, it has been significant to discover that a scientific debate on the topic was actively suppressed worldwide. Sir Richard Dearlove, former head of British spy agency Mi6, claims that Anthony Fauci led the stifling of this debate. Meetings were held where one side of the argument was supported while the opposing view was denied media attention. Instead of disclosing suspicions about a lab leak, Fauci diverted attention away from this theory. Despite claims by evolutionary virologists that the virus evolved naturally, there was no intelligence or scientific data supporting this. These developments have shed light on the suppression of the origins debate. (116 words)
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There have been a lot of developments in the investigation to the origins of COVID nineteen. What do you think has been most significant in the past 2 years? Speaker 1: Well, I think what's been most significant is to discover That, a legitimate scientific debate about the origins of COVID was actually actively suppressed, Really around the world. Speaker 0: Sir Richard Dearlove is the former head of the British spy agency, Mi6. He says stifling of the debate around the origins of COVID was led by Anthony Fauci. Speaker 1: We've now, through FOI, Freedom of Information, got pretty clear idea of what meetings took place, what happened. They put forward one side of the argument, which they, for reasons I don't fully understand, decided to support and made Absolutely sure that the opposite view was not given any oxygen or media publicity. Speaker 0: Instead of disclosing the scientists' and his secret suspicions, Anthony Fauci diverted attention away from the lab leak theory. Speaker 2: Doctor Fauci, could you address these suggestions or concerns, that this virus was somehow man made, We came out of the laboratory in China. Can we go study this virus? What are the prospects of that? Speaker 3: There was a study, recently that we can make available to you where a group of highly qualified evolutionary virologists Look at the sequences there and the sequences in, bats as they evolve, And the mutations that it took to get to the point where it is now is totally consistent with a jump of a species from an animal to a human. Speaker 4: I watched what was happening in the public domain, and I listened to folks like, doctor Anthony Fauci. And what he said was The mutations of the virus were totally consistent with a jump from animals to humans. Speaker 0: John Ratcliffe was the United States director of National Intelligence, the head of 18 different agencies. Speaker 4: What I found was that there wasn't any intelligence that supported that, nor was there any scientific data that we could find.

@mommaleo - Jenny

@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander @KimDotcom @MonaRahalkar @CharlesRixey 😳EXCLUSIVE: THE END FOR FAUCI Dr Robert Kadlec reported directly to the President in Preparedness and Response, and was Fauci’s superior. He FINALLY tells the TRUTH. Why? Because he says it’s the RIGHT THING TO DO. ‼️🦠‼️🦠‼️🦠☣️🦠‼️🦠‼️🦠‼️

Video Transcript AI Summary
In a world exclusive, a former high-ranking US government official, Dr. Robert Kallic, reveals private discussions with Anthony Fauci about downplaying the lab leak theory. Dr. Kallic explains that the intention was to prevent accusations and allegations, but it backfired. Fauci's concern for his reputation and lack of visibility into the grants supporting the Wuhan Institute of Virology may have influenced his actions. Dr. Kallic feels an obligation to share the facts, not seeking sympathy or forgiveness, but to provide a factual account of what happened.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In a world exclusive, an insider reveals private discussions he had with Anthony Fauci where they deliberately decided to downplay the lab leak theory. Speaker 1: Doctor Robert Kallic was a high ranking official in the US government's preparedness and response department. He reported directly to the president, and he was also technically Fauci's superior. Here for the 1st time, he opens up on camera. Speaker 2: The key is not to let the story die Because there are people who would like it to kinda go away. It's really important to kind of keep people, focused on it, And and I think there has to be accountability across the board. Speaker 0: What discussions did you have with Anthony Fauci and others behind the scenes about deliberately deciding to turn down the temperature on a lab leak. Speaker 2: Well, it was early on in the event When I did have the conversation with, doctor, Collins and doctor Fauci, it was the intent then to get the White House involved. What we were trying to do was trying to make sure that, politically, that you would not get into a situation where People would make accusations or allegations, but quite honestly, what happened was the exact opposite. Speaker 0: You and Fauci in those discussions just wanted to turned the rhetoric down. Is that Correct. Speaker 2: That was it. Speaker 1: Kadleks says Fauci was worried about protecting his own reputation, and that could be why he diverted attention away from the lab leak. Speaker 2: That would be a natural reaction of him or anybody, You know, particularly, you know, I think for him to saying, you know, what what could this do to me and to my to our institute As a consequence, if we were found to have some culpability or some involvement in this, and I think it would probably You know, made that even more acute was the fact that they didn't have good visibility into what they were doing and what they were supporting, through the grants, through EcoHealth Alliance that went to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. I think that just That just probably magnified that concern. Speaker 0: It's pretty extraordinary to to reveal the conversations that you had with Fauci and Collins. It's pretty extraordinary to publicly say that you did try to downplay the rhetoric around a bio weapon and a lab leak. Are you doing this interview in part because you feel guilty about that? Speaker 2: I just feel like it it's an obligation that I Have to to kinda say what happened. And I think to factually try to portray this, not to to get sympathy or or forgiveness, but more to saying factually, here's here's what happened. This is what we tried to do. Did it work? No.

@mommaleo - Jenny

@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander @KimDotcom @MonaRahalkar @CharlesRixey ☣️BIOWEAPONS : AI : NANOTECH☣️ What did we do then? What do we do now?

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses the history of the U.S. bioweapons program and its connection to the CIA. They explain how the CIA brought German and Japanese scientists to the U.S. after World War II and conducted unethical experiments on the American public. They also mention how President Nixon shut down the program in 1969, but the CIA continued their research and funded gain-of-function studies. The speaker highlights the role of Tony Fauci in bioweapons development and the connection between the CIA and the Wuhan lab. They conclude by urging people to resist government overreach and fight for their freedoms.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So, you know, I look back on, in my new book, I talk about the history of the U. S. Bio weapons program. And from the beginning, the CIA was running the bio weapons program. Why? Because we didn't have a bioweapons program after World War II. And the CIA's first operation was called Operation Paperclip. And it was an operation to get all the bioweapons and nuclear and chemical scientists out of Germany and Japan, where they had extensive bioweapons program. The Japanese had a horrendous program where they were doing they did live visitations on 3,000 people. You know, they killed them all during the operation, removing their infected organs while they were alive with no anesthesia. And these were horrible, horrible scientists. The CIA elevated them, brought them over to Fort Detrick, downloaded them and made made them the heads of hospital systems pharmaceutical companies in Japan and continued to work with them. And they brought all the German scientists over here. And then they did all these experiments unwittingly on the American public. They sprayed toxins in National Airport. They sprayed them in the Pentagon, air conditioning system. They put poison water in NIH. They put light bulbs filled with bacteria that they broke on the grates and contaminated the New York City subway system, some of those microbes still in the subway today, they they did aerial dosing from ships of about, of about 60,000,000 Americans. At a dose, San Francisco, Los Angeles, New York, Virginia, Norfolk, Virginia, all of the seaside towns were dosed from the air. And a lot of the midwestern cities were also all unwitting. They did 200 outdoor tests on Americans, unwitting. And they developed bioweapons by 1969 had a nuclear equivalent. They could kill people at $29 for death according to a CIA study, which they're bragging about. And then in 'sixty nine, President Nixon shocked the world by going to Fort Detrick and ending the U. S. Bioweapons program. He was worried we were creating bioweapons that could be reproduced for nothing. They were kind of a poor man's nuclear bomb. Anybody could reproduce them once we. And we were publishing how you did it. So they were giving blueprints to the to foreign nations to create these things that could be used against us. And he said, why are we doing this? We have nuclear bombs. We don't need these things. And we have a monopoly on nuclear bombs, 7 nations to have them. We've agreed not to give them to anybody else. Why are we letting these guys get, you know, weapons that are going to be turned against us? So we shut down the whole program. The Pentagon destroyed all of its bio weapons. But the CIA went into Fort Detrick right before the Pentagon went in there and took cultures of all the different weapons and hid them in a warehouse. A lot of it was in New York City and Washington DC. And they continued, we signed the bioweapons treaty, which Nixon, one of the great accomplishments of Nixon, he got all the nations in the world to sign it. We signed the Geneva Convention, finally, after delaying it for 50 years, the CIA was breaking the law the entire time. Then, in 2001, in June, the CIA sponsors the first of its pandemic simulations. It simulates a biological attack on Washington, D. C. By Saddam Hussein. This is in June 2001. That simulation got international press. And a lot of the CIA people like Judith Miller from The New York Times was promoting it, going around doing all the talk shows. It, it triggered 2 Senate hearings, 1 by Joe Biden's committee. And that hearing was in September 2001. What happened in September 2001? The 9/11. So that hearing was going on during 9/11. As soon as 9/11 happened, the neocons, which were working on all this stuff with the CIA, pulled out the Patriot Act, a 3 50 page statue from a shelf where I had been waiting for a while. And in 1 week said we want to pass this in a week. There's only 1 member of Congress who read it, which was Dennis Kucinich. And he went crazy and said, you have no idea this is the end of American democracy if you do this. It allows the CIA to spy on Americans. One of the things the Patriot Act did is it did not get rid of the Geneva Convention or the bioweapons treaty. But it said no federal official can be prosecuted for violating those 2 statutes. So it reopened the bioweapons arms race globally. And when the, a week after, when the Patriot Act was being debated, and it was being held up by 2 senators, there was an anthrax attack on the US capital. It was blamed on Saddam Hussein. And they although the new consul said, the we were right in the pandemic simulations, Saddam Hussein attacked us. And we used that as a justification to go to war against Saddam Hussein. And within 2 days we passed the Patriot Act. Who got the anthrax? 2 Senate offices. Tom Daschle and Patrick Lee, the 2 senators who were blocking the Patriot Act. The FBI did a 1 year investigation. They said this anthrax was unique. It was Ames Anthrax. There's only 1 place in the world that could have come from, Fort Detrick, the CIA lab. So we went to war. We passed the Patriot Act and immediately started giving $2,000,000,000 a year to bioweapons development. The Pentagon didn't want to do it because it was nervous about the legality because it was a death penalty to violate the Geneva Convention. Oh, you would have been committing a, you know, a war crime even if somebody told you it was okay. It wasn't. And so they funneled it through DITRA and DARPA. They funneled all of that money to NIH to NIAID, which became the primary spear tip of bioweapons development. So, Tony Fauci became the bioweapons czar in 2001. His budget went up by $2,200,000,000. He was personally given a 68% raise from the military. That's why he was the highest paid individual in the federal government. Because he was getting about this 68% bonus every year from the military. But it meant that he could not stop. And the thing the military wanted was gain of function studies, where they could take wild viruses and turn them into bioweapons. And bioweapons development always includes vaccine development. Because unlike chemical weapons, with bioweapons there's always blowback. It's called the boomerang effect. If you give your enemy bubonic plague, your guys are going to get it first, too. They're going to get it quickly. So the only way you can deploy a bioweapons is if you have already developed a vaccine. So the race is to develop a vaccine simultaneously and then you can deploy the bioweapons and your enemy will take a couple of years to develop the vaccine. And you can inoculate all of your team. So in 2014, 3 of Tony Fauci's bugs escaped from federal labs. And their escapes were public. And it caused a huge Abruaha, there were senate hearings. And people were immensely upset. And, and 300 scientists wrote letter wrote a petition to President Obama saying you have to shut down Tony Fauci. He's going to cause a global pandemic. And Obama declared a moratorium and told Fauci, ordered Fauci to shut down the 18 studies he was been doing. As I show in my book, he didn't do it. He instead took that science And he moved it offshore to the Wuhan lab and to the Ukraine. And when he did that, he was not the only one who did it. Tony Fauci spent about $29,000,000 on gain of function science in Wuhan. I let the CIA spend over $100,000,000. And the military spent about that much too, about 64,000,000 And they, the CIA funneled the money, most of it through USAID. But they also the CIA, as we now know, was also running this organization called the EcoHealth Alliance, which Fauci was funneling his money through. It was like a laundromat, where they funneled federal money so that it was so that their fingerprints would not be in the would not be visible on those studies. And, So, so that's important to understand now, just to get to the final thing in my book. And Tony Fallachy, if any of you end up reading the book. That last chapter is, talks about the, you know, the all of these, you know, these pandemic simulations. I've been studying the CIA for much of my adult life. Because of my family's relationship, I wrote a book, which I, to me is my best book, American Values. And it is a story of my family's 60 year fist fight with the CIA, which began with my grandfather, Joseph Kennedy, who served on the Hoover Commission in 1955 and recommended the disbanding of the CIA's plans, the vision. It's, you know, it's the vision that was fixing elections and assassinating leaders and all of that. So the CIA never forgave my family for that. And then when my uncle came in, you know, after the Bay of Pigs, he fired the top 3 officials, Bizzle and Goodell and and Alan Dulles, who then made himself the head of the Warren Commission 3 years later. And when my uncle died, he told a reporter, I'm glad the little shit is dead. He thought he was a god. And, So I, you know, I have I know a lot about the CIA. I've gotten their manuals. I paid over a $1,000 get these manuals because, you you know, they're training manuals from MK Ultra. And MK stands for mind control, MK Naomi, MK Dietrich, it all came out of Fort Detrich and NIH. And then 150 colleges around our country where they were funding these studies. And if you look at what they do in these simulations, they're using all of these techniques that they developed in colleges in college laboratories, social scientists and other scientists, medical scientists for years who were studying how do you control individual behavior but also Mass Baby. How do you induce mass psychosis? How do you create Manchurian candidates? You know, how do you do all these? And all these colleges studying these. And how do you, how do you impose centralized foreign control on indigenous populations. By coming into a country by using propaganda, by using fear, by sowing chaos, by destroying relationships, destroying faith in institutions, driving people apart and creating chaos so they will invite in an authority who will give them peace and safety. And all of them, all of these mind control techniques are designed to accelerate that process. And they, you know, they study the Stockholm syndrome, for example. How do you, if you lock people, you know, down, they become grateful to their captors. And they become angry at the people who criticize their captors. And they believe that the only way that they can escape is confinement, is through total obedience and total compliance to, you know, to their to their jailers. And, but, one of the most interesting experiments was called, the, Anyway, I'll think of it. It was, what Milgram Milgram. And it was a scientist, associate scientist at Yale, a sociologist called Stanley Milgram, who was a, who was part of the MK Ultra program. And he conducted this experiment where he recruited subjects from every Walk of American Life, there were students, there were professors, there were business people, there were blacks, whites, everybody from the New Haven area. And he would put the subject in a chair at a table where there was a dial in front of them that they could administer an electric shock to a person who is tied in the chair in the next room, who they told was tied in a chair, but he was actually a confederate of Milgram's. He was an actor. And when they turn this dial up and administer the supposed electric shock, they could hear the man in the other room screaming, shouting, begging, struggling, bleeding with them, crying. And the thought that but and the most of the people who are participating in this experiment begged to stop. A lot of them were crying and telling the doctor. The doctor was standing behind them saying, turn it up, turn it down, turn it higher, turn it down, turn it even higher, turn it down. And 67% of them turned it up to 2 50 volts where it was marked potentially fatal. 67%. You can go on Wikipedia and look the Milgram experiment. So, but 33% of the people got up and walked out. And what Milgram said that if you, for 67% of people, if you have an authority figure that has some imprimatur of legitimacy, like a doctor's title, that 67% of people will take his orders, even it means violating their most sacred values. It'll go against everything they believe in. And to me, it occurred to me many times during that 2020 we were all involved in this huge Milgram experiment. And that Anthony Fauci was, you know, Doctor. Milgram telling us you can violate the constitution. You can censor speech. You can close churches. You can shut businesses. You can ban jury trials. And you can, you know, tell people what they can and can't do. And you can gaslight them and marginalize them and vilify them. And and, you know, no cruelty is too great for somebody who dissipates. And what I would say to you is that 33% of the people walked out. And the people in this room are the 33% who wouldn't be told what to do. And, you know, what our job is now is to fight for the 67% till they wake up until they're able to fight for themselves to restore the freedoms that all of us believe in. And I'll leave you with three thoughts. 1 is that any power that government takes from the people, it will never return voluntarily. Number 2 rule. Every power the government takes, it will ultimately abuse to the ultimate to the maximum extent possible. And number 3, nobody ever complied their way out of totalitarianism. The only thing we could do is resist. Thank you all very much. Speaker 1: I just saw this from Wall Street Silver, and it's got 4,700,000 views. So let's just start there. It says, His days are numbered, referencing me. They will make it look like an accident. He is likely correct. The CIA does this, and it is used for blackmailing their assets in high places to keep them in line. Hollywood actor Jim Caviezel says CIA operates world's biggest pedophile ring. Well, let me explain something to All of you in the world that think that I'm a little girl and I'm afraid of you. I'm not scared in in the least bit. I gave God brought me into Hollywood to become an actor. He asked me to do that. He was my intel officer, the greatest God, the only God, and he loved me enough to give me a purpose in my life because I was the lowest of the low at that time. And I would gladly trade my life to save these little ones because the screaming that I heard was so horrific. I can't sleep at night. At 3 in the morning, for whatever reason, I can hear it. Speaker 2: It is the fastest growing international crime network that the world has ever seen. I'd it has already passed the illegal arms trade, and soon it's gonna pass the truck trade. Think you can sell a bag of coke cake one time to the child I'd 5 to 10 times a day. God's children are not for sale. Speaker 0: How long even knew Speaker 2: this. Paul hears now. How many pedophiles you got? 288. How many kids Speaker 0: I I'd For homeland you know we can't go off rescuing Honduran kids in Colombia. Speaker 2: Janice will disappear Speaker 0: for good. Speaker 2: I'm actually walking into her room right now I Stay in that seat there. What we do. You quit your job, and you go and rescue those kids. So this I She could be a block down the road or she could be in Moscow, Bangkok, LA. She's an agent operator. There, it's all regulatory. No one goes in. On the army, on the police, no threats. When is this with you or daughter? There's no marine unit coming. I It's still tears you to pieces. And that's just not a windshield. I that's again. God tells you what to do.

@mommaleo - Jenny

𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙉𝙪𝙣𝙣-𝙇𝙪𝙜𝙖𝙧 𝘾𝙤𝙤𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙏𝙝𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙩 𝙍𝙚𝙙𝙪𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙜𝙧𝙖𝙢 : Biolabs in Ukraine The high-risk lab was the first built of a series planned under the Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction program: “The 𝐥𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥-𝟑 𝐛𝐢𝐨-𝐬𝐚𝐟𝐞𝐭𝐲 𝐥𝐚𝐛, which is the first built under the expanded authority of the Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction program, 𝙬𝙞𝙡𝙡 𝙗𝙚 𝙪𝙨𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙤 𝙨𝙩𝙪𝙙𝙮 𝙖𝙣𝙩𝙝𝙧𝙖𝙭, 𝙩𝙪𝙡𝙖𝙧𝙚𝙢𝙞𝙖 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙌 𝙛𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙖𝙨 𝙬𝙚𝙡𝙡 𝙖𝙨 𝙤𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙙𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙚𝙧𝙤𝙪𝙨 𝙥𝙖𝙩𝙝𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙣𝙨.” “Lugar said plans for the facility began 𝐢𝐧 𝟐𝟎𝟎𝟓 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐒𝐞𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫 𝐁𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐎𝐛𝐚𝐦𝐚 𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐚 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐔𝐤𝐫𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐨𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐬. Lugar and Obama also helped coordinate efforts between the U.S and Ukrainian researchers that year in an effort to study and help prevent avian flu.“

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses gratitude to Secretary Pineda and acknowledges the outstanding work of Secretary of Defense Leon. The speaker then discusses the 20th anniversary of the Nunn Lugar program and thanks the individuals involved in its conception and implementation. The speaker acknowledges the leadership of Ash Carter and praises the visionaries Sam Nunn and Dick Lugar for their work in promoting cooperation and nuclear disarmament. The speaker also expresses gratitude to Nunn and Lugar for their guidance and shares personal experiences with them. The speaker emphasizes the importance of public service and bipartisanship in addressing national and global challenges. The speaker highlights the success of the Nunn Lugar program in securing nuclear materials and preventing the spread of deadly weapons. The speaker reaffirms the commitment to preventing nuclear terrorism and the need for continued investment in threat reduction programs. The speaker calls for sustained partnerships and collaboration, including with Russia, to ensure global security. The speaker concludes by sharing a story from a trip with Dick Lugar and emphasizing the importance of dismantling weapons for a safer future.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good afternoon, everybody. It is wonderful to be back. Secretary Pineda, thank you for the introduction. Last week at the White House, we had our 1st Cabinet meeting since the election, and it was a chance for me to thank my entire team for their service, for keeping our country safe and strong these past 4 years. And, Leon, few have done more than you in that regard. And that includes taking care of our remarkable men and women in uniform and their families, and keeping our military the absolute best in the world, bar none. So thank you, Leon, for being such an outstanding Secretary of Defense. We're very grateful. Now, I am not here to give a big speech. I wanted to just come by and join you in marking the 20th anniversary of one of the country's smartest and most successful National security programs none luger. And I want to express my gratitude to all of you from government, academia, NGOs, and our partners around the world. People in this room conceived it. You built it. You've sustained it. And of course, I especially want to acknowledge a leader who helped create it and who now helps guide it as our outstanding Deputy Secretary of Defense, Ash Carter. So thank you, Ash, for your great work. Of course, no one has done more than the 2 visionaries on this stage. You have to think about what real visionaries do. They look at the world and they see what's missing. So they set out to fill the gap, to build something new. And that's what Sam Nunn and Dick Lugar did many years ago. They challenged us to think anew, to imagine, after decades of confrontation, how our nations My Engage in Cooperation: Early in the Cold War, Einstein warned of the danger of our wisdom not keeping pace with our technology. And with Nunn Lugar, our wisdom began to catch up. I also wanted to be here because of my own personal debt to these 2 leaders. When I was elected to the Senate, Sam Nunn was one of the first leaders I called. Obviously, he had an extraordinary reputation for his work on a whole range of issues in the Senate. And, Sam, by the way, I should I always meant to say thanks for taking my call. So we do small talk. He congratulates me on being elected. And Then he says, I got 2 pieces of advice for you. 1st piece of advice, get a seat on the Foreign Relations Committee. I did that. 2nd piece of advice learn from Dick Lugar. I did that, too. So I took Sam's advice then, and as President, I continue to value his advice and his counsel. Sam, as one of the so called Four Horsemen, which I'd say is a pretty ominous nickname, has spoken out for a world without nuclear weapons. And with your Nuclear Threat Initiative you helped us ratify the New START Treaty, rally the world to secure nuclear materials, Strengthen the Global Non Proliferation Regime and Create an International Fuel Bank for Peaceful Nuclear Power. Sam, that's an extraordinary legacy and an extraordinary record. Thank you for your partnership and your leadership. And because I took Sam's advice, I came to know and admire Dick Lugar. I was a new junior senator, but, nevertheless, he was willing to take me in and Served in many cases, particularly on the issues that we're celebrating here today, took me in as a pupil for him. I watched And I learned. And when we worked together to pass a law to speed up the lockdown of nuclear materials, Obviously, it was called Blue Girl Obama in that order. And, Dick, I want to Take this opportunity to say something else. At times, we've disagreed on matters of policy, but one thing we've always shared is a notion of what public service should be, that it ought to be more than just doing what's popular in the moment, that it ought to be about what's right for our nation over the long term. It ought to be about Problem solving and governance, not just how we can score political points on each other or engage in obstructionism. And Where compromise is not a vice and where bipartisanship is actually considered a virtue to be rewarded, not punished That's the essence of these 2 gentlemen, and that's the essence of nunn Lugar. That's the spirit that's defined Dick's public service for nearly 50 years, And that's the bipartisan tradition that we need more of here in Washington, especially on foreign policy. So, Dick, as you prepare to leave the Senate that you love, I think I speak on behalf of everybody here and millions of people across the country to say that your legacy will endure in a safer and more secure world, and a safer and more secure America. And we pray that this nation produces more leaders with your sense of decency and civility and integrity, we are grateful to you. Thank you very much. Now, I will point out it was Dick who took me on my first Foreign trip, as a senator to Russia and Ukraine and Azerbaijan, we were there to see the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program in action. And the first thing I learned is that when Dick Lugar travels overseas, it's not a junket. We didn't stop and look at a lot of beautiful sites and sort of lounge around on Some shopping excursions. He wore out every 25 year old staffer that was part of this part of this delegation. What you also learned is that, Dick Lugar the more remote the place is and the more obscure the facility is, The bigger a rock star Dick Lugar is. They love him in these places. I remember walking through 1 facility, I started leaning in for a closer look, and one of the workers said, Don't touch that orange stuff. This turned out to be TNT. At another point, the workers were taking apart munitions gloves on their hands, masks over their faces. And I'm thinking, wait a second, why don't we have masks on? This is the kind of trip you take with Dick Lugar. We're traipsing through nuclear weapon storage sites, and junkyards full Old land mines and technicians showing off test tubes. You ask, well, what's that? Well, that's anthrax, that's plague. Shouldn't you keep it in something a little more sturdy than this? Dick Lugar is standing in the back of the room. I remember I asked him, Dick, have you seen it? He said, yes, I've seen it. I don't get too close now. That's what it's like traveling with Dick Lugar. And I had been a strong advocate for CTR before, but visiting those facilities, Seeing the work that so many of you do, seeing these old weapons once aimed at us now being turned into scrap truly brought home how important this work was. This is one of our most important national security programs, and it's a perfect example of the kind of partnerships that we need working together to meet challenges that no nation can address on its own. And so Nunn Lugar is the foundation for the vision that I laid out Once I was elected President and traveled to Prague, where nations come together to secure nuclear materials, as we're doing now with our nuclear security summits, where we build on New START and continue to work to reduce our arsenals, where we strengthen the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty and prevent the spread of the world's most deadly weapons, and where over time we come closer to our ultimate vision a world without nuclear weapons. That's why we haven't just sustained programs like Nunn Lugar over the past 4 years, we've worked with all of you to strengthen it, expanding it to some 80 nations far beyond the old Soviet Union moving ahead with the destruction of chemical weapons partnering with others countries from Africa to Asia, and global health organizations to prevent the spread of deadly diseases and bioterrorism. And I have to give a shout out to somebody who was on the original team with Ash that conceived of CTR. She's been working it ever since, and now leads our effort at the White House. Laura Holgate is here, and so we're very proud of her for the outstanding work that she's done. And we've worked to keep weapons from spreading, whether it was nuclear material in Libya, or now chemical weapons in Syria. And on Syria, let me just say this: We will continue to support the legitimate aspirations of the Syrian people engaging with the opposition, providing them with the humanitarian aid, and working for a transition to a Syria that's free of the Assad regime. And today, I want to make it absolutely clear to Assad and those under his command The world is watching. The use of chemical weapons is and would be totally unacceptable. And if you make the tragic mistake of using these weapons, there will be consequences and you will be held accountable. We simply cannot allow the 21st century to be darkened by the worst weapons of the 20th century. And that's why over the past 4 years, we've continued to make critical investments in our threat reduction programs, not just at DOD, but at energy and at state. In fact, we've been increasing funding and sustaining it. And even as we make some very tough fiscal choices, we're We're going to keep investing in these programs because our national security depends on it. After all, even with all your success, The thousands of missiles destroyed, bombers and submarines eliminated, the warheads that have been deactivated, we're nowhere near done, not by a long shot. And you all know this: There's still much too much material nuclear, chemical, biological being stored Without enough protection, there's still terrorists and criminal gangs doing everything they can to get their hands on it. And make no mistake: If they get it, they will use it, potentially killing hundreds of thousands of innocent people, perhaps triggering a global crisis. That's why I continue to believe that nuclear terrorism remains one of the greatest threats to global security. That's why working to prevent nuclear terrorism is going to remain one of my top national security priorities as long as I have the privilege of being President of the United States. So I came here in part to say We cannot let our guard down. This needs to be a sustained effort across all your organizations, across our government. We have to keep investing in our people and in new technologies. We have to sustain the partnerships we have, and that includes Russia. We're joined by some of our Russian friends here today. Russia has said that our current agreement hasn't kept pace with the changing relationship between our countries to which we say, Let's update it. Let's work with Russia as an equal partner. Let's continue the work that's so important to the security of both our countries. And I'm optimistic that we can. We have to keep creating new partnerships. We have to make sure to paraphrase Einstein that our wisdom stays ahead of our technology. And I know you're committed to this. And I want you to know that I am, too. So let me leave you with a story of that first trip Dick and I took together. You may remember this, Dick. I was in Ukraine. We went to a facility, an old factory. We walked down these long, dark corridors. We're ducking our heads, stepping over puddles of something. We're not sure what it was. Finally, we came across some women sitting at a worktable. On it were piles of old artillery shells, and the women were sitting there taking them apart by hand, slowly, carefully, 1 by 1. It took decades and extraordinary sums of money to build those all arsenals. And it's gonna take decades and continued investments to dismantle them. The 2 of you know this better than anybody. It's painstaking work. It rarely makes headlines. But I want each of you to know, and everybody who is participating in this important effort to know that the work you do is absolutely vital to our national security into our global security. Missile by missile, warhead by warhead, shell by shell, We're putting a bygone era behind us. Inspired by Sam Nunn and Dick Lugar, we're moving closer to the future that we seek a future where these weapons never threaten our children again a future where we know the security and peace of a world without nuclear weapons. I could not be prouder of these gentlemen. I'm proud to call them friends. And I'm looking forward to continuing to work with them and all of you in the years to come. Thank you very much.

@mommaleo - Jenny

☣️🅽🆄🅽🅽-🅻🆄🅶🅰🆁 🆁🅴🅿🅾🆁🆃☣️ The signing came as Lugar and Obama visited the Kiev Central Sanitary and Epidemiological Station, one of the facilities that will be covered under the agreement. The Station maintains a pathogen collection and conducts work on many highly dangerous infections reported in Ukraine. These include pathogens causing diseases such as: Anthrax, Tularemia, Brucellosis, Listeriosis, Diphtheria, Cholera, Typhoid, and others. SOUNDS LIKE A BIOLAB TO ME.

@mommaleo - Jenny

@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander @KimDotcom @MonaRahalkar @CharlesRixey 🪺🅼🅾🅲🅺🅸🅽🅶🅱🅸🆁🅳 🅼🅴🅳🅸🅰🪺 QANON! RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA QANON! The media went hard denying and twisted definitions, following in the footsteps of FAUCI when he denied gain-of-function. https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/09/media/biolab-ukraine-russia-qanon-false-conspiracy-theory/index.html #CNNsux

Video Transcript AI Summary
Russian state media has been circulating a false story since 2015, claiming that America is running facilities in Ukraine and Georgia that caused deadly disease outbreaks. These claims were debunked in 2020, with the United States clarifying that the facilities are for vaccine development and reporting outbreaks caused by dangerous pathogens. However, the story resurfaced recently, with the Russian foreign ministry and social media platforms sharing it widely. It has even gained attention in the United States, with figures like conspiracy theorist Stu Peters and platforms like Infowars promoting it. Russia's false narrative on American biolabs in Ukraine continues to spread.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The foreboding music, biohazard warnings. This Russian state media footage from twenty fifteen claims to show America running facilities in Ukraine and Georgia that caused deadly outbreaks of disease and killed local livestock. This story is false, but that has not stopped it continuing to circulate, evolving from biological hazards to biological weapons And becoming a key part of Russia's disinformation campaign, justifying the invasion of Ukraine. The claims were debunked several years ago when in twenty twenty, the United States issued a statement to, quote, set the record straight, explaining the facilities are in fact for vaccine development and to report outbreaks caused by dangerous pathogens before they pose security or stability threats. But this week, the story was back. Speaker 1: We are confirming the facts that were unveiled during the special military operation in Ukraine That indicates an emergency cleanup of military biological programs by the Kyiv regime. They were carried out by Kyiv and financed by the United States of America. Speaker 0: Multiple times the Russian foreign ministry has resurfaced the debunked story. On Tuesday, it was mentioned by a Russian ally. Speaker 2: It is reported that those biolabs store large number of dangerous viruses. During Russia's military operation, it was found that the US is using those facilities To conduct biological militarization activities. Speaker 0: So alongside these official statements, it's being repeatedly shared across social media from Facebook to Twitter to Telegram, and CNN's been tracking its spread. And you can see here it's being posted in Canada, Australia, Germany and this tweet as one example, you can see it's being retweeted over 500 times already. The theory has now attracted the attention of figures and platforms with significant followings in the United States. Speaker 2: Go into Ukraine and take out the biolabs. Speaker 0: Such as the conspiracy theorist Stu Peters and has been featured on the far right platform Infowars. Speaker 2: US bioweapons labs in Ukraine. Speaker 0: And so Russia's false narrative on American biolabs in Ukraine continues to spread. Katie Pogles, CNN,
Analysis: Russia and QAnon have the same false conspiracy theory about Ukraine | CNN Business A new conspiracy theory has become popular among some of the online communities that formed around QAnon – one simultaneously being promoted by the Kremlin as a justification for its invasion of Ukraine. The false claim: the United States is developing bioweapons in Ukraine and Vladimir Putin has stepped in to save the day and destroy the weapons. cnn.com

@mommaleo - Jenny

@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander @KimDotcom @MonaRahalkar @CharlesRixey 𝙊𝙊𝙋𝙎 𝙄 𝙂𝙐𝙀𝙎𝙎 𝙔𝙊𝙐 𝙒𝙀𝙍𝙀 𝙍𝙄𝙂𝙃𝙏 So it wasn’t QAnon? (are you seeing a pattern yet?) Victoria Nuland: Ukraine Has "Biological Research Facilities," Worried Russia May Seize Them

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ukraine has biological research facilities that they are concerned Russian forces may try to gain control of. They are working with Ukraine to prevent any research materials from falling into Russian hands. Russian propaganda groups are spreading information about a Ukrainian plot to release biological weapons, but there is no doubt in the speaker's mind that if there is an incident or attack, it would be the Russians behind it. The speaker believes it is a classic Russian technique to blame others for what they plan to do themselves.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I only have a minute left. Let me ask you, does Ukraine have chemical or biological weapons? Speaker 1: Ukraine has, biological research facilities, Which in fact we are now quite concerned Russian troops, Russian forces may be seeking to, gain control of. So we are working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those Research materials from falling into the hands of, Russian forces should they approach Speaker 0: I'm sure you are aware that the Russian propaganda The groups are already putting out there all kinds of information about how they've uncovered a plot by the Ukrainians to release biological weapons in the country and with NATO's coordination. If there is a biological or chemical weapon incident or, or attack inside of Ukraine, is there any doubt in your mind that 100% it would be the Russians that would be behind it? Speaker 1: There is no doubt in my mind, senator, and it is classic Russian, technique to blame on the other guy what they're planning to do themselves.

@mommaleo - Jenny

@Forbes suppressed safety and truth by stating that “Former presidential candidate and Congress member Tulsi Gabbard shared false information Sunday about U.S. involvement in Ukraine biological laboratories Sunday, giving credence to an unfounded Russian-backed conspiracy theory the U.S. has warned could serve as justification for Russia to use biological and chemical weapons against Ukraine.” 🤔Will the ever set the record straight?

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are 25 to 30 U.S. funded biolabs in Ukraine conducting research on dangerous pathogens. These labs could easily be compromised due to the ongoing war in the region, potentially releasing deadly pathogens that could spread worldwide. To protect people, these labs should be shut down immediately and the pathogens destroyed. The Biden Harris administration should collaborate with Russia, Ukraine, NATO, and the UN to implement a ceasefire in the vicinity of these labs. Additionally, the U.S. funds around 300 biolabs worldwide, engaging in risky research similar to the Wuhan lab. These labs should have been closed two years ago. It is crucial for the administration and Congress to take action for the well-being of everyone.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The undeniable facts. There are 25 to 30 U. S. Funded biolabs in Ukraine. According to the U. S. Government, these biolabs are conducting research on dangerous pathogens. Ukraine is in an active war zone with widespread bombing, artillery, and shelling, and these facilities, even in the best of circumstances, could easily be compromised and release these deadly pathogens. Now like COVID, these pathogens know no borders. If they are inadvertently or purposely breached or compromised, they will quickly spread all throughout Europe, the United States, and the rest of the world, causing untold suffering and death. So in order to protect the American people, the people of Europe, the people around the world, these labs need to be shut down immediately, and the pathogens that they hold need to be destroyed. Instead of trying to cover this up, the Biden Harris administration needs to work with Russia, Ukraine, NATO, the UN to immediately implement a ceasefire for all military action in the vicinity of these labs until they're secured and these pathogens are destroyed. Now in addition to all this, the US funds around 300 biolabs around the world who are engaging in dangerous research, including gain of function, similar to the lab in Wuhan where COVID nineteen may have originated from. Now, after realizing how dangerous and vulnerable these labs are, they should have all been shut down 2 years ago, but they haven't. Now this is not a partisan political issue. The administration and Congress need to act now for the health and well-being of every American and every person on this planet.

@mommaleo - Jenny

@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander @KimDotcom @MonaRahalkar @CharlesRixey @Forbes 𝐖𝐄𝐋𝐋 𝐖𝐄𝐋𝐋 𝐖𝐄𝐋𝐋 Russian Defense Ministry: investigating 240 disease causing pathogens discovered in US-sponsored biolabs in Ukraine including anthrax and cholera. Pathogens are studied and developed with intent of use for "offensive actions."

Video Transcript AI Summary
240 different substances of various types have been discovered and are being researched. Most of them are related to the treatment of certain diseases. It is believed that these substances can enhance functions not only in Ukraine but also in other countries. For example, a university in Ukraine continues to collaborate with other countries in this field.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Были обнаружены порядка 240 различных б могут су субстанция различного плана мы их и и продолжаем исследовать большая часть из них касается си болезни значит х у нас нет сомнений сомнения, что они работают над усиление функций не только на территории Украины больше не работать на территории штатах потому технологии это точно такие свое ну например бо университет когда-то с ним тоже сот Украины продолжает сотрудничать именно по этому направлению

@mommaleo - Jenny

✈️Now let’s move over to China and chat about “The Godfather of Nano-tech” with a 30 year career at one of our most prestigious Ivy League schools, HARVARD. 😉He helped build a lab in Wuhan for the CCP. 🤯Unbeknownst to Harvard University beginning in 2011, Lieber became a “Strategic Scientist” at Wuhan University of Technology (WUT) in China and was a contractual participant in China’s Thousand Talents Plan from in or about 2012 to 2017.

@mommaleo - Jenny

🧵Thread🧵BioWarfare+Wuhan Harvard+Leiber Klaus+Yuval+Biotech #Nanotech #Biotech #Globalist https://www.harvardmagazine.com/2011/01/virus-sized-transistors

Charles Lieber's nanoscale transistors can enter cells without harming them | Harvard Magazine Chemist Charles Lieber and his colleagues have developed a nanoscale transistor so small it can enter, probe, and communicate with cells without harming them. harvardmagazine.com

@mommaleo - Jenny

@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander @KimDotcom @MonaRahalkar @CharlesRixey @Forbes I didn’t forget 𝙈𝙀𝙏𝘼𝘽𝙄𝙊𝙏𝘼

@mommaleo - Jenny

Hunter responsible for bio lab: Metabiota has worked in Ukraine for Black & Veatch, a US defence contractor with deep ties to military intelligence agencies, which built secure labs in Ukraine that worked on killer diseases and bioweapons, said Russia. https://www.opindia.com/2022/03/baraka-obama-spearheaded-bio-weapon-lab-in-ukraine-hunter-biden-secured-funding-reports/

Hunter Biden, Obama facilitated setting up Ukraine bioweapon lab: Reports Russia said that US President Joe Biden's son Hunter Biden and his investment fund Rosemont Seneca financed the Pentagon's bio-weapon programme in Ukraine | OpIndia News opindia.com

@mommaleo - Jenny

@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander @KimDotcom @MonaRahalkar @CharlesRixey @Forbes @MarcoPolo501c3 and @KimDotcom

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the video, the speaker explains that Hunter Biden helped a company called Metabiota get federal contracts in Ukraine because his firm, Rosemont Seneca Technology Partners, had an ownership share in Metabiota. The speaker clarifies that Hunter Biden is not the mastermind behind the operation but rather relied on his partner to draft emails and make decisions. The speaker also mentions that the ownership of Metabiota has changed names and is now called Pilot Growth Equity. The speaker concludes by stating that Hunter's main business partner still owns a significant share of the company.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Very good question. So we mentioned this briefly in the report because, again, the public reporting out there, from Jack Maxey and others who are, in my opinion, patriotic people, the reporting has been quite sloppy, and this is what we can surmise from the laptop. Again, I'm not saying that if another laptop, let's say, the one that the Russian drug dealers, according according to Hunter himself, stole in the summer of 2018. If that one's, surfaces, and there's a bunch of shit on Metabiot on that, you know, then that's that. But the one that we have, It's very simple. Hunter helped Metabiota get contracts in Ukraine. And the reason why he did was because his firm, at that time, called Rosemont Seneca Technology Partners had an ownership share in Metabiota. And so, if anybody, if your liberal friend asks you, What was Hunter Biden's involvement? He, it's very simple. He helped MetaBio to get Federal contracts. So, if you, if you read any Hunter Biden's correspondence. You know that he is not the guy they bring in to plan all this shit. He's just not sharp enough. But what he does have is the famous daddy, who, and he can send emails. In fact, a lot of the emails his, his partner Eric Schwaren would draft, and he would mark, you know, he would say yes or no to. Meaning, Hunter, Hunter didn't even want to put in the mental effort to draft the email. He'd tell his partner, hey, draft this email, and, and see if, and I'll see if I approve of it. So, what Hunter Biden did very specifically was help Metabio to get Federal contracts through a prime contractor called Black and Veatch in Ukraine. And, the reason why we can say this for sure, is because of, and this has been published, the correspondence between Meta Biota And Hunter Biden, and Baden Pizarski of Burisma saying, Hey, there's a lot of opportunities for Metabiota here in Ukraine. And so, we don't allege that Hunter Biden was there, or you know, in his damn white, white, doctor suit, you know, measuring stuff in a biolab, but we can for sure say that he was involved in Metabiota, which is a, you know, plant pandemic, we call it plandemic. The plandemic tracking company, that to this day, Hunter Biden's main business partner owner has a huge ownership share. And even larger than Hunter Biden's ownership share, there's a guy who lives in Little Rock, on Country Club Lane named Rob Acker. And they renamed This is what they do, they rename the firms once corruption services. So once evidence of corruption services, they change the names. And Rosemont Seneca Technology Partners, which has the ownership share of NetaBiota, is now called Pilot Growth Equity. Everybody can go look it up. And it's in our report, and Rob Walker STILL owns a large portion of it, and there, the evaluation of that company has appreciated significantly since the Start of the Plandemic. And so, we know that there's one degree of separate there's there's not even one degree of separation in in many things, but in the laptop. But we can for sure say that Hunter helped them get contracts, and that Hunter's main business partner still owns a huge share of it. I can't for sure say that Hunter still owns a share of Pilot Growth Equity, but I can for sure say that, his business partner did

@mommaleo - Jenny

@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander @KimDotcom @MonaRahalkar @CharlesRixey @Forbes @MarcoPolo501c3

@mommaleo - Jenny

#BarackObama planted deadly seeds

@mommaleo - Jenny

@Doctor_I_am_The @AGHuff @NestCommander @KimDotcom @MonaRahalkar @CharlesRixey @Forbes @MarcoPolo501c3 The dynamic duo 💚 Fauci and his wife

@mommaleo - Jenny

FAUCI AND HIS WIFE = >75 years in the swamp. #COVID19 #COVID #Fauci #Grady #TheDeepState #transparency #FREEDOM #Lies #CORRUPTION

Video Transcript AI Summary
Unelected deep state operatives pose a threat to democracy by pursuing their own hidden agendas. However, I am encouraged by the unexpected support we have gained from those who may not necessarily agree with us. This support is truly remarkable and beautiful. Eventually, the truth behind this situation will be revealed, and it is both concerning and disheartening.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Unelected deep state operatives who defy the voters to push their own secret agendas are truly a threat to democracy itself, and I was so heartened when I looked. I think it's backfired. Seriously, people that don't exactly dig us and they don't exactly like me, they're fighting for us. It's Incredible. It's actually a beautiful thing. We've picked up a lot of support because at some point this whole thing is going to be exposed, and it's really and and it's really dangerous and it's really sad

@mommaleo - Jenny

★ 𝐖𝐎𝐑𝐊𝐁𝐎𝐎𝐊 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐛𝐞 𝐝𝐨𝐰𝐧𝐥𝐨𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐝; 𝐢𝐭 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐒𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐑𝐀𝐋 𝐓𝐇𝐎𝐔𝐒𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐬 𝐚𝐜𝐫𝐨𝐬𝐬 𝟓𝟖 𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐬. 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐋𝐀𝐑𝐆𝐄𝐒𝐓 𝐒𝐈𝐍𝐆𝐋𝐄 𝐂𝐎𝐋𝐋𝐄𝐂𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐎𝐅 🦠𝐂𝐎𝐕𝐈𝐃-𝐎𝐑𝐈𝐆𝐈𝐍 𝐒𝐎𝐔𝐑𝐂𝐄𝐒 𝐎𝐍 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐏𝐋𝐀𝐍𝐄𝐓! 👏𝐓𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐊𝐒! 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐥𝐞𝐬 𝐑𝐢𝐱𝐞𝐲 𝐌𝐀 𝐌𝐁𝐀 (𝐂)! SARS-CoV-2 Origins Research Reference Project - 202304223 July 2021 DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.12600.47367/6 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353547700_SARS-CoV-2_Origins_Research_Reference_Project_-_202304223

ResearchGate - Temporarily Unavailable researchgate.net

@mommaleo - Jenny

𝙂𝘼𝙄𝙉 𝙊𝙁 𝙁𝙐𝙉𝘾𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉 ‘For those unfamiliar with gain-of-function research, it essentially means juicing up naturally occurring animal viruses in a lab to make them more infectious among humans. This practice is nothing new. Scientists in the United States have long known how to mutate animal viruses to infect humans.

@mommaleo - Jenny

@CharlesRixey has listed how the virus or the response to the virus shows evidence of all 7 categories of gain of function experiments: https://t.co/b78BgwbVoN

Saved - January 5, 2024 at 9:18 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Russian forces claim to have discovered over 30 US-owned bio-weapon labs in Ukraine. The Pentagon admitted to having 46 biolabs in Ukraine, but stated they were for research purposes. These labs were started in 2005 and were part of a project to rid the world of weapons of mass destruction. There are allegations of child trafficking involving Joe and Hunter Biden, with claims of underground networks and adrenochrome harvesting. The Cabal allegedly held hunting parties to raise adrenochrome levels in children. The British and Danish monarchs are said to have participated in these hunts.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

Covert OPs Unreported: Adrenochrome🩸 Russian Forces discovered over 30 US owned, CIA run Bio-Weapon Labs in the Ukraine ready to release viruses on the Russian people. In Underground Tunnels beneath Chernobyl (a system that ran under Biden-owned property) were mutilated and dead children in chains. Putin declared, “We are rescuing Biden’s victims. There are/were 30 biolabs (to develop biological weapons) in Ukraine and who owns them (The Pentagon). The U.S. said it's just a research lab. Russia will expose everything. But In a official statement by the Pentagon they actually admitted that there were 46 biolabs in Ukraine as part of a project to rid the world of "weapons of mass destruction." Where did we hear that from? (Iraq) The biolabs were in fact started in 2005 with the Defence Intelligence Agency which created a 501 C3 called the Global Viral Forecasting Institute with a Mossad Operative named Nathan Wolfe which became Metabiota. The US (West) has been developing this under Barrack Obama & Joe Biden for the last 10 years between 2005-2015 for the purposes of generating Biological/Chemical Warfare to use against the Russians, which is why they’ve been collecting DNA samples from Slavic People. After the 2014 coup in Kiev, Ukraine became a hotspot for pedophiles of all colors. Joe & Hunter Biden have been the main figures in the child sex trafficking network. J. Biden had a Villa with a huge underground network of tunnels and adrenochrome and organ harvesting factories. The real reason why the Cabal held "Hunting Parties" was to create fear in the children thus raising their Adrenochrome levels and would have devices to extract the blood while out in the woods where they can suck it right from their body on the spot while they were still alive. The British & Denmark Monarchs all participated in these hunts. The Biden Crime Family-

Saved - January 20, 2024 at 12:27 PM

@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones

I was asked about the US backed Ukrainian bio labs when I went on RT. The result was a message TO THE WORLD that is pure veritas to millions of Americans. Please share https://t.co/gfwdCxFFQQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker opposes bioweapon labs because they believe they pose a real threat to people's safety, regardless of their nationality. They claim that the West is preparing a new pathogen and that the criminals running the US government are at war with the American people. The speaker believes that these criminals are building bioweapon labs in other countries to avoid responsibility. They also express concern about the military industrial complex and the incompetence of those in power. The speaker emphasizes the desire for peace, control over their own country, and collaboration with other nations. They urge the need to win the information war against globalists to prevent nuclear war.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Whether you're Russian or whether you're Norwegian or or whether you're French or whether you're Mexican, these bioweapon labs set up and expanded under George w Bush more than 15 years ago are the real threat. So I oppose these bioweapon labs not because I'm a Russian agent or not because I'm a South African agent, but because I'm an American that loves my family. And I know that, the head of the Russian ministry over chemical and biological weapons came out a few months ago, did excellent presentation showing that the west is preparing a new pathogen to release it. And that's just true. So when somebody's telling the truth, I will agree with them, because I align myself, with the truth. And if the Russians were openly developing antifunction biological weapons and building laboratories in Mexico, I would call for the US to invade and and stop those laboratories as Russia did in Ukraine, because I care about soul preservation in life. And so the reason the criminals that run my government that that that and and are literally waging war on the American people, they dissolved our borders. They're shipping in Fentanyl. They're destroying our families. I mean, they're they're at war with us. They're not Americans doing this, folks. We we we've been hijacked. They are literally building bioweapon labs in third party countries so they have plausible deniability, and the whole world is in danger. So I agreed 3 months ago when the Russian, defense minister over chemical and biological weapons came out and warned of this. I was already saying it before he did because I was interviewing all the experts and all the insiders in watching the Davos group, the mouthpiece of BlackRock and the Bilderberg group and the new world order. I mean, really, the real James Bond villains that that's all based on, literally specters, what you should probably call it, they are salivating saying they're gonna use a virus for global domination and to bring down the nation states. So I had family die from the COVID they released, And I've had friends die from the shots. 17,000,000 are dead according to insurance company actuaries. And so I am literally being bombarded by this occupational force here in America, I'm peacefully trying to get Trump elected. I'm trying to get governors elected. I'm trying to get the crazy people from control of these hijackers that that have hijacked this country. And so I want the world to know, not just Russians, that the American people are are absolutely against this. You know, I would get attacked some. I was still mainly popular on the street, but I would get some attacks 3, 4 years ago, for supporting Trump. I go to the grocery store by myself. I go to the shopping mall. I go to church. I walk my dog down the street. All I get is love now from everybody. So I'm I'm telling the world the globalists are way weaker than you think because I'm well known. The average person isn't well known, which is great. They have their privacy. But I'm I am well known, and I'm telling you, I'm getting 0 pushback, 0, anger in America. All I get is we appreciate you. Keep what you're doing. So I want I want the world to know the American people want peace. We do not want World War 3. We do not want nuclear war. We want our country to be under our control. We want your country to be under your control. We have so many resources together. We wanna go to space together. We want to work with each other and like Trump went to North Korea to make a deal. And, you know, everything else. We want progress. We we want a future. But the military industrial complex that president Eisenhower warned of being the number one threat does not want that. They want global domination. And the bigger problem is they're incompetent. They inherited all their power from their predecessors that were more competent. Lloyd Austin, the defense secretary, has been missing for 3, 4 weeks. He lied about where he was. Reportedly, he may even be near death right now. I looked at the number 3 people, the the second, 3rd and 4th in command, none of them are military. They're liberal political scientists. They're not engineers. They're not veterans. That is so dangerous when we have people in command of the US military and then the Hollywood scum out there promoting like Sean Penn a year ago said nuclear war survivable. We need nuclear war on the table. We need nuclear war. He is an incompetent scumbag, and it's the same thing that the Lloyd Austin at least was in the military and at least was in combat. He is in some hospital being eaten alive by bacteria right now, reportedly close to death, and the 3 people under him have never put on a uniform. They've never been an engineer. They've never fired a missile. They've never pulled the trigger. They've never fought somebody in a ditch. They don't know they don't know what war looks like, and that's why they're so dangerous. So we are all in grave danger, and we have to win the information war against the globalist to stop nuclear war for all our children. Speaker 1: While other Networks lie to you about what's happening now. Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next. Visitinfowars.comforward/showandsharethelinktoday.
Saved - February 7, 2024 at 10:53 PM

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

Interesting exchange 👀 Rodgers and Rogan speak on the lab leak theory and the other conspiracy theories that people were wrongly censored for. Rodgers highlights the “playbook” that “they” used and alludes to “Disease X”. Rodgers is all the way red-pilled. ONE OF US! https://t.co/2jTZ9QrIw8

Video Transcript AI Summary
Scientists and the general public initially followed the guidance of Fauci and the NIH without question, while demonizing those who suggested the Lab Leak theory. However, now the theory is widely accepted, along with many other previously censored conspiracies. People believed they were doing the right thing by following guidelines to stop the spread of the virus, but we need to remember what happened. The speaker emphasizes the importance of not forgetting this playbook for future situations. They mention Bill Gates' actions and how he withdrew his investment in a company and started downplaying the vaccine's effectiveness. They also note the disappearance of the flu and warn against forgetting these events.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Scientists that differed, they all just stuck with whatever Fauci said, whatever the NIH said, and they also demonized people Speaker 1: who are saying things that have been proven to Speaker 0: be absolutely correct, like the fucking Lab Leak theory. If you brought up the Lab Leak theory, you used to get banned from YouTube. Now it's widely accepted by everyone. So is all Speaker 1: the all the conspiracies that that got people censored and kicked off. So many of them have been proven to be true. Yeah. And I agree with you. So many people thought they were doing the right thing. They thought, I'm doing my part. This is what we're supposed to do. 2 weeks stop the spread, You know, to you know? I'm I'm full on board. Speaker 0: We're all together. Speaker 1: But let's look at what happened. And people are always like, why do you keep fucking bringing up the vaccine For multiple reasons. But listen, this is a playbook that now we have. Right. For the next time they fucking try and do this shit Right. Don't forget about this. Well, I'm talking about disease. Disease x? Speaker 0: What is the when was the last time they were talking about a disease that doesn't exist, that's not affecting anybody, that's that literally there's no one sick, there's no one dying, and they're talking about how it's coming. Speaker 1: Just watch what Bill Gates does because last time he invested $50,000,000 in in a in a company, he made a pretty good score and then he pulled all his money out. Speaker 0: And then he started disparaging the effectiveness of the vaccine. Speaker 1: After he pulled his money out though. Speaker 0: After he pulled his money in that. And he also started saying the vet that the virus wasn't as bad as we thought it was. Yeah. Oh, gee. How convenient. Speaker 1: Yeah. What happened to the flu? Speaker 0: Yeah. Flu went away. Speaker 1: Zero cases. It's crazy. I mean It is pretty crazy. But we can't we cannot forget about what happened No. Because This is what they're gonna do next time. Speaker 0: Well, the big loser
Saved - February 12, 2024 at 12:21 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Joe Rogan recently discussed a media blackout on Pentagon files, considered a major US leak since Edward Snowden. These files allegedly reveal the "Blueprints for the Ukrainian War," suggesting that the Deep State had long planned for this conflict. This revelation sheds light on the hidden truth behind our reality and history.

@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen

🚨🌎 Holy Shit - Ukraine Joe Rogan discusses media Blackout over Pentagon files which is being referred to as the “biggest US leak since Edward Snowden” The documents are said to have shown the ‘Blueprints for the Ukrainian War’. Now you understand why peace was never an option or even discussed - the Deep State - as suspected following 2014 coup, have been planning this war for a long long time. Brick by brick, piece by piece the true nature of our reality & its history is being revealed to us.

Video Transcript AI Summary
There has been a media blackout on the Pentagon files, which is being called the biggest US government leak since Snowden. Fox News even stated that they will not cover it. The leaked documents contain sensitive blueprints for Ukraine, and it seems to be a blueprint for setting up a war. John Kirby, Biden's spokesperson, who previously lied about the Nord Stream, told the media not to cover this leak and to stay on their side.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's basically been a media blackout over the Pentagon files. It's being called the the the biggest US government leak since Snowden. This happened in, like, the last couple weeks. And Fox News even made a statement, we're not gonna cover this. We're not gonna show the documents because, like, Serious blueprints for Ukraine were were leaked. And do you hear about these? Yes. So Explain that to people. I I'm not I'm I'm I'm definitely not an expert on this. But it seems like a blueprint for setting up this war. Yes. And a Very sensitive document. I mean, Kirby, John Kirby, he's, like, Biden's spokesperson. He's the guy who lied about the Nord Stream, you know, in the press room. Mhmm. And he came out and said to he specifically told media, don't cover this Leak. Don't come to the truth, guys. You're with us.
Saved - June 28, 2024 at 12:05 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Russian Military of Defense claims that the US has relocated Ukrainian bio-labs to Africa and plans to release avian flu as a bioweapon. They allege that Biden-owned Metabiota and other NGOs are involved in pathogen production for Big Pharma. Metabiota has faced backlash in African countries for their alleged biological weapon activities. This raises concerns about the mass depopulation agenda and the need for awareness and action. #FalseFlagOperation #RejectGinanceBill2024 #SayNoToGMO #SayNoToBillGatesGMO #SayNoToBioLabsinAfrica

@jcokechukwu - J. C. Okechukwu

BREAKING: Russian Military of Defense Says The US Has Relocated Ukrainian Bio-Labs to Africa and Are Planning to Release Avian Flu (a bioweapon) To Start Another Pandemic, and Blame It On Putin. #FalseFlagOperation Everyone should see this. He said the U.S. bioweapon operations was relocated due to Russia’s liberation of the labs in Ukraine. Kirillov alleges that Biden-owned Metabiota and other intermediary NGOs are running cover for the U.S. State Department and DoD, posing as humanitarian organizations to conceal their true objective of pathogen production for Big Pharma. Kirillov also pointed out that Biden-owned Metabiota, has been forced to stop operating in many African countries due to awareness of their nefarious biological weapon activities and agenda. Does anyone remember my post from just few a days ago about how Russia stepped into Ukraine and their first target was what they alleged as U.S. -funded Biological weapons labs? Bio-labs are the labs in which they manufacture all these diseases/viruses that they unleash on humanity to trigger pandemics. It is also in these labs that they manufacture these toxic and dangerous GMO seeds and chemicals that are aimed at the mass culling of human population, as Bill from hell had always wished. I reported on this Russian lab destruction in Ukraine vigorously while the destruction was ongoing, two years ago. Now, they’ve relocated them to Africa as part of their mass depopulation agenda against Africans. There’s just no room for carelessness and sleepiness anymore. The enemy is no longer at our doorstep. The enemy is in the building and we must mass sensitize in order to mass expel these parasites from hell. #RejectGinanceBill2024 #SayNoToGMO #SayNoToBillGatesGMO #SayNoToBioLabsinAfrica

Video Transcript AI Summary
Программы военно-биологического исследования, ранее в Украине, теперь переносятся в Африку из-за обвинений в России. Американское правительство задействует более 20 компаний, включая Metabiota, QuikSilver, и EcoHal Alliance, для проведения исследований. Деятельность Metabiota в Африке была прекращена из-за скандала с вывозом вируса Эбола без разрешения. Участники включают бывших военнослужащих из США и Великобритании, а также представителей Центров по контролю и профилактике заболеваний в Африке и Глобального фонда по борьбе со СПИДом. Translation: Biological research programs previously in Ukraine are now being moved to Africa due to accusations against Russia. The U.S. government is utilizing over 20 companies, including Metabiota, QuikSilver, and EcoHal Alliance, for research purposes. Metabiota's activities in Africa were halted due to a scandal involving the unauthorized export of the Ebola virus. Participants include former military personnel from the U.S. and UK, as well as representatives from Disease Control and Prevention Centers in Africa and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Провокация биологического характера с целью обвинения Российской Федерации В связи с тем, что нам удалось восстановить реализацию военно-биологических программ на освобожденных территориях Украины Пентагон вынужден переносить незавершенные в рамках украинских проектов исследования в другие регионы. В настоящее время в зону повышенного интереса попала Африка. Мы уже отмечали деятельность ключевых подрядчиков контагона на африканском континенте в Демократической Республике Конго, Сьерра-Леоне, Камеруне, Уганде и ЮАР. Заказчиками со стороны американского правительства является Управление по снижению угрозы Минобороны США Дитра и Госдепартамент. Для сокрытия целей проводимых исследований Вашингтон задействует сторонних исполнителей. Это подрядная и посреднические организации: Metabiota, QuikSilver, EcoHal Alliance всего более 20 компаний, а также предприятия так называемой BigFarm. Обратите внимание на коммерческое предложение компании Metabiota с пометкой Конфиденциально Она адресована Научно-исследовательскому институту инфекционных болезней сухопутных войск США и касается подготовки специалистов по инфекционным болезням в Кении и Уганде Документ демонстрирует, что изучением патогена в странах африканского континента занимается Управлением Минобороны США по снижению угрозы Дитра Министерства внутренней безопасности, а также для придания видимости взаимодействия с Агентством США по международному развитию. Напомню, что в настоящее время деятельность компании Metabiota прекращена на территории Африки, так как методы её работы стали вызывать слишком много вопросов на уровне национальных правительств. Так, в 2014 году образцы вируса Эбола были незаконно вывезены представителями компании, переданной в НИИ инфекционных болезней сухопутных войск США. На слайде также проведены участники незаконной военно-биологической деятельности. Среди них бывшая военнослужащесть из США и Великобритании, сотрудники Центров по контролю и профилактике заболеваний в Африке, представители Глобального фонда по борьбе со СПИДом.
Saved - November 19, 2024 at 4:07 AM

@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen

“There are 25-30 US Funded Bio-Labs in Ukraine” What you thought US Operated Biological laboratories creating deadly pathogens in Ukraine was just another Conspiracy? Wrong again - Listen to incoming Director for US National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard explain. https://t.co/KRIvRbPTcm

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are 25 to 30 US-funded biolabs in Ukraine conducting research on dangerous pathogens amid an active war. These facilities are at risk of being compromised, potentially leading to the spread of deadly pathogens worldwide, similar to COVID-19. To protect global health, these labs must be shut down immediately, and the pathogens destroyed. The Biden administration should collaborate with Russia, Ukraine, NATO, and the UN to establish a ceasefire around these labs until they are secured. Additionally, the US funds around 300 biolabs globally engaged in risky research. Given the vulnerabilities of these labs, they should have been shut down two years ago. This issue transcends partisan politics; immediate action is necessary for the safety of all people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here are the undeniable facts. There are 25 to 30 US funded biolabs in Ukraine. According to the US government, these biolabs are conducting research on dangerous pathogens. Ukraine is in an active war zone with widespread bombing, artillery, and shelling, and these facilities, even in the best of circumstances, could easily be compromised and release these deadly pathogens. Now, like COVID, these pathogens know no borders. If they are inadvertently or purposely breached or compromised, they will quickly spread all throughout Europe, the United States, and the rest of the world, causing untold suffering and death. So in order to protect the American people, the people of Europe, the people around the world, these labs need to be shut down immediately, and the pathogens that they hold need to be destroyed. Instead of trying to cover this up, the Biden Harris administration needs to work with Russia, Ukraine, NATO, the UN to immediately implement a ceasefire for all military action in the vicinity of these labs until they're secured and these pathogens are destroyed. In addition to all this, the US funds around 300 biolabs around the world who are engaging in dangerous research, including gain of function, similar to the lab in Wuhan where COVID 19 may have originated from. Now after realizing how dangerous and vulnerable these labs are, they should have all been shut down 2 years ago, but they haven't. Now this is not a partisan political issue. The administration and Congress need to act now for the health and well-being of every American and every person on this planet.
Saved - December 21, 2024 at 8:42 PM

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Glenn Greenwald connects the dots on Bio-labs, Anthrax, and Fauci 3/11/2023 Tucker Carlson https://t.co/lmIuQTNH2F

Video Transcript AI Summary
Join us as we discuss a significant story involving U.S. government disinformation regarding biological labs in Ukraine. Victoria Nuland's Senate testimony raised concerns about dangerous labs in Ukraine, contradicting the narrative that these claims are false. Journalists often rely on government denials without investigating the truth, which undermines credible reporting. The government has a history of misleading the public, as seen with the anthrax attacks and the manipulation of the coronavirus. The choice of Ukraine for such research raises questions, especially given its medical infrastructure and the U.S.'s long-standing involvement in the region. This situation warrants scrutiny regarding U.S. intentions and actions in Ukraine. Thank you for joining the conversation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Join us now. Glenn, thanks for coming on. So so I guess the first and most obvious question is, this is kind of a blockbuster story. I have no idea what it means or where it goes, but it it's clearly a case where the US government has been lying as mounted a disinformation campaign, if you will, designed to cover up what it's doing. And nobody in the press corps seems interested in finding out what's at the bottom of this. Why is that? Speaker 1: Right. So first of all, like you, I've heard the Russian and Chinese accusations for weeks that the United States is partnering with Ukraine to have Bio Labs right on the other side of the Russian border and never talked about it because there was never any evidence for it. I don't think the word of the Russians or the Chinese Speaker 0: for it. Speaker 1: What made me get interested in the story was when Victoria Nuland went before the senate and Marco Rubio asked her, are there biological and chemical weapons programs in Ukraine expecting her, even said I only have a minute, her to say no, of course not, so he could then claim it was debunked, but she didn't say no. In fact, she acknowledged exactly what you just went through that not only are there labs, but they're so dangerous, whatever's in them, that they're deeply concerned it would fall into Russian hands. The other point is any journalist who comes on the air and says that they can claim that they can state that these concerns are false or a byproduct of disinformation, like journalists have been doing for weeks under the guise of fact checking, is not telling the truth. All they know is that the Pentagon denies it. The CIA tells them it's not true, and then they equate that. They conflate that with proven fact, which is the number one problem in journalism that we're seeing very pervasively in this war. Speaker 0: It's so shameful that anybody employed as a reporter would do something like that without doing any actual reporting whatsoever, even bothering to learn about the subject, and then to scold anyone for asking legitimate questions. So here's the problem that I have with it. Government does things that are secret. We don't always know what they are. Maybe some cases that's legitimate. But to attack anyone who American citizens who asked honest questions as tools of Russia seems to me so far out of bounds, I'm worried this is being established as a precedent. Speaker 1: Well, as we know, this has been going on for 5 or 6 years that anybody who questions the predominant mainstream narrative from the media, from the Democratic Party, our tools of Vladimir Putin, our Kremlin agents, our sympathizers for Moscow. This has been their tactic forever, and obviously, it's escalated now. But the one point I wanna make, Tucker, is when the government comes out and emphatically denies that they have biological weapons, we know they're not telling the truth. Remember the anthrax attacks right after 911? Very well. They were incredibly terrifying because of how weaponized they were. First, the government said it was from Al Qaeda, then they said it was from Saddam Hussein. In 2008, they said, we solved the case. Actually, it came from the US army lab from an infectious disease specialist under the auspices of Tony Fauci, a scientist who cultivated these weaponized, strains of anthrax and deployed them on US soil. We know they did the same thing with the coronavirus where they manipulated the coronavirus to become more lethal and more contagious. They they claim that those aren't biological weapons because inside their brain, their intention is not to use them but just to study them. But the things they're making are exactly the same as what you would make if you were to make biological weapons. And you have to be so careful to understand what they mean when they deny that they have these. Speaker 0: Well, the the last question. Maybe you don't know the answer, but why Ukraine? You know, of all the countries you would conduct this kind of research in, you would pick one with like a solid medical infrastructure. You'd pick Germany or Israel or some place with, you know, first class scientific research going on. You would not pick Ukraine. Why Ukraine? Speaker 1: Unless you viewed Russia as your primary threat, as let unless you wanted to be provocative toward the Russians, unless you wanted to be in Ukraine developing all sorts of weapons as we clearly have been. We've been flooding that country with lethal arms for 5 or 6 years. So clearly, there's an intention for the United States to be heavily involved in Ukraine. The Russians say their motive is to be threatening and provocative. The United States denies that, but they have their tentacles in Ukraine and have for many years all the time, which is a critical part of the narrative that has been lacking. Speaker 0: That's right. It's fair to ask what have they been doing in Ukraine? Why are all their kids working for Ukrainian companies? What is going on here? Glenn Greenwald, I appreciate you coming on tonight. Thank you. Speaker 1: Thanks, Tucker.
Saved - December 23, 2024 at 1:55 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I raised questions about U.S. funding for secret biolabs in Ukraine, especially after the assassination of Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov, who claimed the coronavirus was artificially created and linked to U.S. biolabs. Victoria Nuland confirmed concerns over biological research facilities in Ukraine, suggesting Russian forces might seek control over them. Additionally, the Russian Defense Ministry has implicated prominent U.S. figures in bioweapons testing in Ukraine, highlighting ongoing Pentagon programs since 2018 focused on RNA/DNA collection for research.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Tucker Carlson: Why is the U.S. funding secret biolabs in Ukraine? https://t.co/Mcx9pw0Vs7

Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion centers on U.S. involvement in biological research in Ukraine amidst accusations from Russia. A U.S. official claimed that any biological or chemical weapon incidents would be attributed to Russia, which has been accused of using disinformation tactics. The conversation reveals that the U.S. has funded biological laboratories in Ukraine, which study dangerous pathogens. Despite denials from U.S. officials about developing biological weapons, there are concerns about the security of these materials in a conflict zone. The Chinese government has called for inspections of these facilities, highlighting international concerns about biological safety. The need for transparency and accountability regarding U.S. actions in Ukraine is emphasized, as the situation remains precarious.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So this question is on our mind. It seems fair. Now that some of what we would have asked if we were US centers, which were not, yes, there's a time limit. Time limit be damned because this is kind of important. But Rubio did not ask those questions. Instead, he changed the subject and told us once again that Vladimir Putin is bad. Watch. Speaker 1: If there's a biological or chemical weapon incident or, or attack inside of Ukraine, is there any doubt in your mind that 100% it would be the Russians that would be behind it? Speaker 2: There is no doubt in my mind, senator, and it is classic Russian, technique to blame on the other guy what they're planning to do themselves. Speaker 0: Okay. Just get a pen. It's a classic Russian technique to blame on the other guy what they are planning to do themselves. That's what Torian Nuland said. We almost laughed out loud. So what you're saying, Torian Nuland, if, for example, you were funding secret bio labs in Ukraine, but wanted to hide that frack from the people who are paying for it in whose name you were doing it, then you might lie about it by claiming the Russians were lying about it. In other words, you might mount a disinformation campaign by claiming the other guy was mounting a disinformation campaign. Is that what you're saying, Tory Noland? It's pretty funny. What's not funny is that this is all entirely real. We invited Marco Rubio on this show tonight to tell us what he knows about these bio labs. He declined to come. That invitation remains open. In the meantime, let's review what little we do know about this. We're gonna start with a spokesman for the Russian defense ministry on Sunday. Now we would never do this. We've never played anything like this on the show before because, of course, we're Americans and we wanna know what's going on. We ask our own officials, the people we elect and whose salaries we pay because it's our country. We don't go to foreign sources because we trust our own sources first. But when it turns out the people who represent us and run our government are lying to us and never apologize for it and doing horrific things in our names, then you have to open your mind a little bit and at least assess what other people are saying. So here was the Russian claim. Watch. Speaker 3: During the course of the special military operation, facts were uncovered at the Kyiv regime mopping up traces of military biological program under development in Ukraine financed by the US Defense Ministry. Speaker 0: Okay. So that apparently, we hadn't seen that until this afternoon we started poking around. That may have been the root of the conspiracy theories that the fact checks told us were Russian disinformation. Let's quote it. Military biological programs are under development in Ukraine financed by the US defense ministry. That's the Russian claim. Separately, a Russian foreign ministry spokesman said the Ukrainians are working on deadly pathogens including plague and anthrax. Is that true? Now obviously, we would not take Russia's word for that ever, but we don't have to take Russia's word for that. The US defense department has a website that contains this media clip about the opening of a biological research facility in Ukraine in 2010. Quote, US senator Dick Lugar applauded the opening of the in interim central reference laboratory in Odessa, Ukraine this week, announcing that it will be instrumental in researching dangerous pathogens used by bioterrorists. The level 3 biosafety lab will be used to study anthrax, tulemeria, and Q fever as well as other dangerous pathogens. Oh, okay. Then the National Pulse dug up, 2011 report from the US National Academy of Sciences that also explained that the Odessa based laboratory, quote, is responsible for the identification of especially dangerous biological pathogens. So what we're doing, this is not the first time you've heard this story, we are funding the creation of deadly pathogens so we can study them and prevent people from getting infected with them, maybe? There are lots of examples of Some of the projects include work on African swine fever virus, hemorrhagic fever virus, and various avian rep respiratory viruses. The interesting thing, the telling thing, is that the US Embassy's website also contains links to fact sheets about America's support for biological research in Ukraine, but all those links are now dead. That's weird. It's our government. We pay for it. Again, they're there in our name, in the name of American citizens, but we can no longer read their web page. How does that work exactly? They have no right to lie to us. The web page is archived thankfully, and the fact sheet show Defense Department funding to laboratories in Ukraine. So that looks like proof. It's not Russian disinformation. It's totally real. Sorry, USA Today, America's newspaper. It's real. You can look it up on the Internet if you want. In the face of that evidence, the Pentagon is still lying about it. And in fact, they're repeating the same unbelievably stupid and now thoroughly discredited lies the fact checkers have told for weeks now. Here's the spokesman for the Pentagon, John Kirby, today. Speaker 4: The Russian accusations, are absurd. They're laughable. And, you know, in the words of my Irish Catholic grandfather, a bunch of malarkey. There's nothing to it. It's classic rush Russian propaganda. And, and, I wouldn't, if I were you, I I wouldn't give it, I wouldn't give it a drop of ink worth worth paying attention to. Speaker 5: Yeah. But but, can you explain to us what has there been any relationship between the We are not Speaker 4: not developing biological or chemical weapons inside Ukraine. It's not happening. Speaker 0: If I were you, I wouldn't devote a drop of ink to it. First First of all, you didn't get to make that decision, mister bureaucrat. We have a free press in this country. You don't get to decide. But you'll notice at the end of that, Kirby refuses to answer the question. Has there been a relationship between the US Pentagon and a bioweapons facility in Ukraine? And if so, what is that relationship? That's Russian disinformation. What's the answer? We're not developing WMD in Ukraine right now. Okay. Got it. But why are we funding this and what exactly are we funding? We reached out to the state department separately, and they provided us with this very carefully worded statement. Quote, the US Department of Defense does not own or operate biological laboratories in Ukraine. Not that anyone said they did. Continuing the quote, under secretary Nuland was referring to Ukrainian diagnostic and biodefense laboratories during her testimony, which are not biological weapons facilities. What's the difference exactly? Continuing the quote. These institutions counter biological threats throughout the country. End quote. So that means nothing. You could describe our nuclear stockpile correctly as defensive. Our nuclear weapons are not designed to preemptively kill anybody. They're designed to prevent other people from killing us, but they're still nuclear weapons. So why don't you stop lying and telling us what's going on here? And why don't you more specifically tell us why you didn't secure these materials? So, yes, we're funding secret biolabs in Ukraine, but they're diagnostic and biodefense laboratories that counter biological threats. Okay. If these are purely defensive labs, why was Tory and Nuland so concerned that Russians would get a hold of the materials from these facilities? Other world powers have come to the obvious conclusion. Again, we hate to do this, but under these circumstances, we asked our own spokespeople. They lied. We're going to the foreign ministry of China, a country we despise. Here's what they said today. They're calling on weapons inspectors to take a look at these facilities in Ukraine right away. Speaker 5: Over the past 2 decades, the United States has been rocking the establishment of a verification regime to the biological weapons convention and refused to accept the inspection of biological facilities within and outside its borders. The move has further aggravated the concern of the international community. We once again urge the US to provide full clarification of its biomilitarization activities within and outside its borders and accept multilateral verification. Speaker 0: Oh, they're putting Russian Chinese propaganda on the screen. Yeah. We did. We also put US government propaganda on the screen, and the difference is we expect to be lied to by foreign governments. We're not globalists. We believe in one country. It's this country, the United States. We do not expect to be lied to by our government, and we won't accept it. But let's get to the substance of what the Chinese government just said. We never agree with the Chinese government on anything. But in this case, they make a fair point. We now know that dangerous biological agents, whether you call them weapons or not, is completely irrelevant because they can be used as weapons. Is a gun a weapon? Not when you're quail hunting. When you're in a gunfight, it is. It's a ridiculous semantic debate. Dangerous biological agents remain, thanks to the Biden administration, unsecured in a chaotic war zone. At some point, we need to know how that happened. Who made those decisions? We have a right to know. And let's hope someone in congress, apparently not Marco Rubio, but someone else will get to the bottom of it. But in the meantime, we pray that somewhere in the United States government, there is an adult who cares enough to get this situation under control immediately. Hey. Sean Hannity here. Hey. Click here to subscribe to Fox News YouTube page and catch our hottest interviews and most compelling analysis. You will not get it anywhere else.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/fQpQyi55eS

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

If you Were Curious Why Igor Kirillov Was Just Assassinated Facts You Probably Didn’t Know Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov, after being one of the first in the world (in a serious government position) to directly say that the coronavirus was artificially created, who sent documents to the Pentagon and asked them about their biolaboratories in Ukraine, who revealed that the West was dumping nuclear waste there, that Kiev was preparing to make a "dirty bomb."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Министерство обороны России продолжает исследовать военно-биологическую деятельность США на Украине и в других регионах. В списке участников американских программ — Элио Сперлман, Грег Гласс и Эндрю Пекас, а также украинские специалисты, такие как Наталья Родина и Елена Нестерова. Многие из них покинули Украину, чтобы избежать ответственности. США активно ищут новых специалистов для разработки оружия массового поражения и продолжают финансировать биологические проекты, включая исследования патогенов. Изменение названий программ на более нейтральные не скрывает их истинной цели. Протесты против американских лабораторий происходят в разных странах, и существует мнение, что пандемия COVID-19 могла быть вызвана утечкой из лаборатории. Вопросы о военно-биологической деятельности США остаются без ответов. The Russian Ministry of Defense continues to investigate the U.S. military-biological activities in Ukraine and elsewhere. Participants in U.S. programs include Elio Sperlman, Greg Glass, and Andrew Pekas, as well as Ukrainian specialists like Natalia Rodina and Elena Nesterova. Many have left Ukraine to avoid accountability. The U.S. is actively seeking new specialists for weapons of mass destruction development and continues to fund biological projects, including pathogen research. Renaming programs to more neutral titles does not conceal their true purpose. Protests against U.S. laboratories are occurring in various countries, and there are concerns that the COVID-19 pandemic may have resulted from a lab leak. Questions about U.S. military-biological activities remain unanswered.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Министерство обороны Российской Федерации продолжает анализ военно-биологической деятельности США и их союзников на Украине и в других регионах мира. Ранее мы уже приводили имена участников американских военно-биологических программ, В их числе должностные лица Министерства обороны США, подрядных организаций Пентагона, американских биотехнологических корпораций, государственных институтов и частных компаний Украины. Сегодня мы дополняем список фигурантов биологических исследований Пентагона. В их числе: Элио Джейкоб Сперлман руководитель неправительственной организации Международный институт проблем ВИЧ и туберкулёза в Киеве. Принимал непосредственное участие в создании лабораторной базы для реализации военно-биологических исследований на территории Украины. Грег Гласс Профессор института новых патогенов при Университете штата Флорида. Занимался изучением распространения возбудителей туриаремии на Украине. Привлекался к реализации проекта юпи-8, распространению вирусов конвик-крымской геморрагической лихорадки и хантавирусов на Украине. Эндрю Стэнли Пекас, профессор молекулярной микробиологии и иммунологии в Школе общественного здравоохранения при Университете Джонса Хопкинса. Привлекался в качестве одного из ведущих консультантов к проекту UP2 применения геноинформационных систем, удаленного наблюдения и лабораторной диагностики за выявлением заболеваний толиоремии сибирской язвы людей и животных на Украине. В числе исполнителей американских военно-биологических проектов граждане Украины Наталья Родина, заместитель генерального директора Государственного учреждения Киевский областной лабораторный центр Минздрава Украины и бывший сотрудник американской компании Black&Wich. С 2020 года является советником командующего медицинскими силами ВСУ по вопросам лабораторной диагностики. Елена Нестерова, директор Украинского института исследований проблем общественного здравоохранения, координировала деятельность компании Лабиринт Глобал Хеалс, осуществляла взаимодействие между госорганами Украины и компанией Метобиота. Скрываясь от ответственности за участие в военно-биологических проектах, многие фигуранты покинули территорию Украины. Для предотвращения возможной утечки сведений о незаконной деятельности Пентагона американская администрация предпринимает экстренные меры по их розыску и возвращению. Через Украинский научно-технический центр осуществляется работа по двум направлениям: сбор данных о местонахождении сотрудников, уже имеющих опыт участия в так называемых украинских проектах, а также поиск новых специалистов в области разработки оружия массового поражения. Обратите ваше внимание на распространяемую через сайт Плантация анкету для обучаемых на специальных курсах. При этом обязательным условием участия в них является наличие опыта в исследованиях двойного назначения. В период с 24 по 26 апреля 2023 года с отобранными кандидатами пройдёт онлайн-обучение. Параллельно планируется внизать очную встречу в Варшаве. Ходе сборов участникам будет предложено продолжить работу над закрытыми проектами на украинской территории и за её пределами. Мы не исключаем, что под видом подобных курсов будут проводиться мероприятия по подготовке провокаций с биологическим оружием и развёртывания информационной кампании против Российской Федерации. Для реализации поставленных задач Управления по снижению угрозы Минобороны США Дитра задействует потенциал учёных-биологов не только из Украины, но и государств Средней Азии и Закавказья. Работа в этом направлении спланирована американской администрацией на период по меньшей мере до 2025 года. Финансирование проектов военного назначения осуществляется американским военным ведомством с помощью системы грантов. Распределение денежных средств возложено на НТЦ и Международный научно-технический центр. Возглавляет данную организацию бывший руководитель Агентства по контролю за вооружением США Рональд Лемон. Хотелось бы обратить внимание на названия отдельных проектов НТЦ без указания их территориальной принадлежности. Проект 2410 Оценка природной устойчивости возбудителя бруцеллёза у домашних и диких животных. Направлен на изучение возможности передачи этого опасного патогена человеку. Примечательно, что исследование проводилось при участии специалистов Университета Флориды. В рамках проекта 2513 изучаются факторы риска и молекулярные свойства устойчивых во внешней среде вирулентных энтербактерий. Исследование направлено выделение штаммов микроорганизмов, невосприимчивых ко всем известным классам антибиотиков. Проект 2545 предусматривает моделирование эволюционных изменений отдельных видов вирусов, буньявирусов, высоко патогенных для человека. При этом исследования по комбинирунию генетических материалов опасных патогенов планируется проводить при поддержке Национального агентства по исследованиям и инновациям Великобритании. Напомню, что целью реализуемой ИМТЦ программой снижения биологической угрозы является защита США, их вооружённых сил и союзников. Это в очередной раз подтверждает, что Вашингтон рассматривает постсоветское пространство, как плацдарм для развёртывания воинских подразделений НАТО. На примере Украины мы видим, что навязанное коллективным Западом финансирование военно-биологических программ приводит к утрате национального биологического суверенитета и подрыву собственного научно-технического потенциала в сфере биологической, продовольственной и фармацевтической безопасности. Министерство обороны РФ ранее информировало о проведении американскими фармкомпаниями, так называемой Биг Фармой, исследований направленной эволюции, а также о коррупции и сговоре с госструктурами США, связанным с разработкой и производством вакцинных препаратов. Было отмечено, что представители регулирующих органов лоббируют коммерческие интересы компании в ущерб текущим стандартам безопасности и качества. Давая решение на использование препаратов без прохождения контрольных процедур, чиновники федеральных агентств впоследствии занимают ключевые должности в фармацевтических компаниях. В их числе: Бывшие сотрудники Управления по надзору за качеством продуктов и медикаментов Министерства здравоохранения США Марк Макленнон, действующий член совета директоров компании Johnson Johnson Скотт Готтлиб, член совета директоров компании Pfizer Стивен Хан, главный врач компании Flagship Pyonning, непосредственно связанная с Moderna. По имеющей у нас информации, сговор между чиновниками и производителями антиковидной вакцины Pfizer позволил запустить в обращение препарата с серьёзными побочными эффектами. При этом на момент одобрения вакцины у Pfizer были реальные доказательства, подтверждающие повышенный риск серьёзных патологий сердечно-сосудистой системы после вакцинации. В закрытом отчёте компании говорится, цитата: Имеются данные, свидетельствующие о том, что пациенты, получающие вакцины от COVID-19, подвергаются повышенному риску развития миокардита. С апреля 2021 года Moderna сообщила о росте случаев миокардита и перикардита в Соединённых Штатах после вакцинации с использованием мРНК вакцин, особенно у подростков мужского пола и молодых людей старше 16 лет. Патологические изменения обычно наступали в течение нескольких дней после вакцинации, и чаще возникали после получения второй дозы. Конец цитаты. Напомню, подобные исследования высокотоксичных препаратов с неизученным риском побочных эффектов проводились по заказу Дитра на украинских гражданах и военнослужащих ВСУ без учёта каких бы то ни было этических норм. Складывается впечатление, что для американской фармпромышленности, имеющей целью получения максимальной прибыли, подобный подход является нормой, а его организация всячески поддерживается Демократической партией США. Министерство обороны уже отмечало противоречивые заявления представителей политических элит США о прекращении работ Пентагона в биолабораториях на территории Украины. Обратите внимание на протокол совещания рабочей группы американских и украинских специалистов под руководством представителей Дитра от 20 октября 2022 года по планам реализации программы снижения биологических угроз на Украине. Согласно документу, несмотря на вынужденную паузу, связанную с проведением специальной военной операции, в настоящее время деятельность в рамках программы возобновлена. Основными задачами на данном этапе является продолжение строительства биолабораторий на Украине, а также расширение формата подготовки украинских специалистов-биологов. Озвученные Министерством обороны России факты военно-биологической деятельности Пентагона заставляют Вашингтон предпринимать усилия по сокрытию истинного характера проводимых работ. Так, решено изменить название программы Совместные биологические исследования, которая фактически направлена на разработку компонентов биологического оружия. В протоколе отмечено, что программа получила новое название Исследование по бионадзору. В соответствии с документам, военное ведомство намерено продолжать исследование опасных патогенов, расширять сбор биологических материалов и отправлять их в Соединенные Штаты. Планы Пентагона по продолжению исследования двойного назначения на украинских биообъектах и в других странах мира со сменой названия программы это результат невнятной реакции мирового сообщества из-за боязни ряда стран идти на конфронтацию с американскими властями. Госдепартамент США подготовил серию публикаций, в которых пытаются поставить под сомнение документально подтверждённые факты своих незаконных биологических исследований. Так, 14 марта 2023 года на сайте Госдепартамента США был опубликован бюллетень, где Россия вновь обвиняется в дезинформации. В попытке отвести удар от Демократической партии США проправительственные американские СМИ, в том числе Вашингтон пост, распространились заявления Госдепартамента, в которых напрочь отрицаются установленные исторические факты подготовки военно-биологических атак на территории Северной Кореи и Китая в начале 50-х годов прошлого века. А озвученная Минобороны России информация игнорируется. США исходит из логики того, что если не удалось доказать более ранние эпизоды, то ведь все обвинения в сегодняшней военно-биологической деятельности являются дезинформацией. Необходимо отметить, что США никогда чётко не заявляют своих обязательств в области безопасности исследований в подконтрольных им биолабораториях. Непрозрачность их деятельности создаёт риск распространения опасных патогенов в районах размещения биообъектов. В связи с этим в августе 2021 года южнокорейская общественная организация подала в суд на биологическую лабораторию Форт-Детрика и Вооруженные силы США в Корее за контрабанду токсичных веществ на американские военные базы в нарушении внутреннего законодательства. Судебный иск связан с тем, что американское командование в Корее в период с ноября 2017 года по январь 2019 года незаконно возили опасные вещества на свои военные базы. 5 апреля 2022 года жители Южной Кореи вышли на улицу в знак протеста против биологических лабораторий США рядом с их военной базой Пусане. Общественные акции протеста в Корее далеко не единичный случай. Ранее массовые выступления против деятельности американских лабораторий прошли в Армении, Киргизии и Сербии. В конце февраля 2023 года международный секретарь рабочей партии Ирландии Гэри Грейнджер, выступая на конференции Усиление угрозы применения НАТО биологического оружия на фоне обострения международных противоречий заявил, что угроза применения такого вида оружия массового поражения растет с каждым днем. Грейнджер упомянул: Украина располагает биологическими лабораториями, финансируемыми в США. Это может привести к миллионам жертв, включая риск несчастного случая. Конец цитаты. Как мы неоднократно отмечали, перенос наиболее опасных исследований за пределы национальной территории является частью стратегии Соединенных Штатов в сфере биологической безопасности. При этом размещение биообъектов в третьих странах не учитывает интересы местного населения и представляет серьёзную угрозу для целых регионов. Хотел бы обратить ваше внимание на заявления одного из федеральных министерств США о том, что пандемия COVID-19 могла произойти в результате утечки вируса из лаборатории в городе Ухань. В заявлении подчёркивается, цитата: Заболевание имеет лабораторное происхождение, и вирус, скорее всего, распространёнся в результате несчастного случая. Конец цитаты. Нюанс заключается в том, что с данным заявлением выступило Министерство энергетики. Возникает закономерный вопрос: какое отношение Министерство энергетики США имеет в борьбе с биологическими угрозами и резот проекты, имеющие признаки двойного назначения. Министерство обороны России считает, что Министерство энергетики США наравне с Пентагоном является основным организатором и непосредственным участником военно-биологической деятельности. Только официально в 2023 году Министерство энергетики США выделило 105 миллионов долларов на исследование в рамках проекта Виртуальная среда исследований в области подготовки к биоугрозам, в ходе которой предполагается изучить эпидемическое распространение заболевания. Обращаю ваше внимание, что у специалистов остаётся ряд вопросов, связанных с, мягко говоря, странными для большинства вирусов изменчивостью и географическим происхождением вариантов COVID-19. Например, штамм Бета впервые появился в ЮАР и был выявлен в Великобритании в декабре 2020 года. Штамм Гамма в Бразилии в январе 2021 года. Дельта в Индии в июне 2021 года. При этом каждый новый вариант обладал улучшенными свойствами с точки зрения их военно-биологического применения, нанося всё больший экономический ущерб. Несмотря на крайне жёсткие антиковидные меры, появление в 2022 году субвариантов штамма омикрон BA 5.2 и BF7 вызвало лавинообразный рост заболевших в Китае. Создаётся впечатление, что кем-то предпринимаются целенаправленные действия по усилению патогенных свойств вируса, а пандемия искусственно подпитываться посредством вброса новых, усовершенствованных вариантов. Пока эти вопросы остаются без ответа. Кроме того, поступающая информация свидетельствует, что руководство Соединённых Штатов продолжает привлекать непрофильное государственное ведомство, не имеющее прямого отношения к сфере здравоохранения, к реализации военно-биологических программ, отводя внимание от главного бенефициара Пентагона. Более подробно о деятельности Министерства энергетики США в области биологии двойного назначения мы расскажем в следующий раз.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/WCUQfKWTII

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Victoria Nuland was asked whether 🇺🇦 has bioweapons "Ukraine has biological research facilities, which in fact we are now quite concerned Russian troops, Russian forces, may be seeking to gain control of" Russian government has been saying all along, that US are funding Biolabs 🇺🇸BIDEN, CLINTON, SOROS GROUPS BEHIND BIOWEAPON TESTING IN UKRAINE: Bombshell details from Russian Defense Ministry which unveils huge Democrat Party members and backers behind programs to make bioweapons in Ukraine and across globe. Briefing on illegal Pentagon bioweapon programmes in 🇺🇦Since 2018, it has been known that the Pentagon is collecting specifically RNA/DNA for 'research' "Over 2-3 generations [of DNA-based bioweapons], such changes take place that they fully replace the original look" - Putin VICTORIA NULAND: Ukraine has biological research facilities, which, in fact, we are now quite concerned russian troops, russian forces may be seeking to gain control of. So we are working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of russian forces should they approach.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ukraine has biological research facilities that are at risk of being seized by Russian troops. We are collaborating with Ukraine to ensure that these research materials do not fall into Russian hands as they advance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ukraine has biological research facilities, which, in fact, we are now quite concerned Russian troops Russian forces may be seeking to gain control of. So we are working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of, Russian forces should they approach.
Saved - February 12, 2025 at 8:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been reflecting on the troubling revelations surrounding U.S. involvement in biolabs in Ukraine. Tucker Carlson raises critical questions about why the U.S. funds these secret facilities. The assassination of Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov, who exposed the artificial origins of COVID-19 and the existence of these labs, adds to the mystery. Reports suggest a network of biological weapons labs linked to U.S. interests, with implications of war crimes. There are calls for immediate action to shut down these labs, as they pose significant risks globally.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Why is Tucker the only one in the U.S. media who asks this question? Tucker Carlson: Why is the U.S. funding secret biolabs in Ukraine? https://t.co/u8Q1BcqYpA

Video Transcript AI Summary
Four days ago, I wouldn't have believed the Biden administration was funding secret biolabs in Ukraine, but Under Secretary of State Nuland confirmed their existence during a Senate hearing. Despite fact-checks dismissing it as Russian disinformation, these labs are real, and Nuland expressed concern about their contents falling into Russian hands. The Russian Defense Ministry claimed the labs were developing military biological programs with US funding, possibly involving deadly pathogens like plague and anthrax. The US embassy in Ukraine has a web page explaining that American and Ukrainian scientists have worked on a whole bunch of different experiments like this. The US government is downplaying the situation, with the Pentagon calling Russian accusations "absurd."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome to Tucker Carlson tonight. If you had told us just four days ago that the Biden administration was funding secret biolabs in Ukraine of all places, we would not have believed you. Yeah. I don't think we're gonna put that on TV. No. Thanks. Then if you told us that not only did the administration fund these secret biolabs in Ukraine, but that they then failed to secure the deadly contents of those labs before the Russian invasion, an invasion they knew was coming, an invasion they helped encourage. If you had told us that four days ago, we'd have dismissed you as a nut. It was just too preposterous. We would not want anything to do with the story like that. There was no way it could be true. It's too far out. In any case, we already knew for a fact that that story was false. How do we know that? Because we read USA Today, America's newspaper. Within hours of the Russian invasion, USA Today published a rebuttal to all those crazies who are yammering on about secret Ukrainian biolabs. Here was the headline. Fact check. False claim of US biolabs in Ukraine tied to Russian disinformation campaign. So if you look carefully at the story, and we did because we were interested, you noticed that this fact check was sourced to Ukrainian government unnamed officials and then Biden state department officials. So these were not exactly objective sources on this subject, but still, the story seemed definitive. It was totally emphatic. Quote, Russia has teamed up with China to further amplify the false claim of US labs in Ukraine. Okay. USA Today says it's Russian disinformation. Maybe it is. On to the next story. But the fact checks didn't stop. That was weird. We kept seeing the same fact check again and again. It was almost like despite endless official clarification, some people refused to believe the Biden administration. They preferred Russian propaganda instead, and we assume they must be QAnon members. We assume that because foreign policy magazine told us that. According to foreign policy, QAnon, whatever that is, was frantically disseminating, quote, false claims of US bio warfare labs in Ukraine. Those labs obviously didn't exist. It was all just another lie from the Russians who lie for a living. Then the European Union weighed up weighed in, throwing its credibility behind the same claim. These are conspiracy theories. The EU told us they're lies spread by Putin. An EU spokesman then reminded us that, quote, the credibility of information provided by the Kremlin is in general very doubtful and low. That was good to know. Quote, Russian disinformation has a track record of promoting manipulative narratives about biological weapons and alleged secret labs. Yeah. We're not gonna do a segment about secret labs in Ukraine. Last thing we wanna do on this show is traffic in Russian disinformation spread by QAnon. So we took a pass on that story. And that's where things stood until yesterday when we happened to tune in to a hearing of the senate foreign relations committee. Toria Nuland was testifying, so we're interested. Nuland's one of the people who brought us the Iraq war, never apologized for that, and kept getting promoted because that's how DC works. Tory Noland is now Joe Biden's undersecretary of state in charge of Ukraine, and she knows a lot about Ukraine. In 02/2014, Tory Noland engineered a coup in Ukraine in the name of democracy, of course. So she's a highly informed source about Ukraine. So she was having this colloquy with senator Marco Rubio of Florida during her testimony. And at one point, Rubio took attack that we were not expecting at all. He asked Nuhon if Ukraine had biological weapons. We never imagined Ukraine would have biological weapons. Why would Ukraine have bioweapons? So it seemed like a pretty strange question, but it wasn't half as shocking as the answer he got. Watch what Toya Nuhlen said. Speaker 1: Does Ukraine have chemical or biological weapons? Speaker 2: Ukraine has, biological research facilities, which, in fact, we are now quite concerned Russian troops, Russian forces may be seeking to, gain control of. So we are working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of, Russian forces should they approach? Speaker 0: Does Ukraine have biological weapons? Ukraine has biological research facilities. What? You mean secret biolabs? Like, the secret biolabs Ukraine definitely doesn't have? Ukraine has those? Yes. It does. And not only does Ukraine have secret biolabs, Tory Nuland said, whatever they're doing in those labs is so dangerous and so scary that she is, quote, quite concerned that the so called research material inside those biolabs might fall into the hands of Russian forces. Trying to use profanity on the air to describe our reaction, our jaws drop. Let's leave it there. Under oath in an open committee hearing, Tory and Noland just confirmed that the Russian disinformation they've been telling us for days is a lie and a conspiracy theory and crazy and immoral to believe is in fact totally and completely true. Woah. You don't hear things like that every day in Washington. Talk about a showstopper, and a dozen questions instantly jumped to mind. What exactly are they doing in these secret Ukrainian biolabs? Ukraine is the poorest country in Europe. It's hardly a hotbed of biomedical research. We're assuming these weren't pharmaceutical labs, probably not developing new leukemia drugs. From your answer, Troy Nuland, we would assume because you all but said it that there's a military application to this research that they're working on bioweapons. Again, your answer suggests that. Why would we fund something like that in Ukraine? And why didn't you secure the contents of these biolabs before the Russians arrived as you knew they would? And then why did you go out of your way to lie to the American public about all of this? If the, quote, research materials in these labs were to escape somehow and you seem very concerned about that, what would be the effect on Ukraine and then on the rest of the world? How can we prepare for the consequences of that, this thing that you're worried about? Shouldn't we be preparing? Because as it turns out, we've just spent the last two years living with a pathogen that began in another foreign bio lab funded by the United States government secretly. So this question is on our mind. It seems fair. Now that's some of what we would have asked if we were US centers, which were not. Yes. There's a time limit. Time limit be damned because this is kind of important. But Rubio did not ask those questions. Instead, he changed the subject and told us once again that Vladimir Putin is bad. Watch. Speaker 1: If there's a biological or chemical weapon incident or, or attack inside of Ukraine, is there any doubt in your mind that 100% it would be the Russians that would be behind it? Speaker 2: There is no doubt in my mind, senator, and it is classic Russian, technique to blame on the other guy what they're planning to do themselves. Speaker 0: Okay. Just get a pen. It's a classic Russian technique to blame on the other guy what they are planning to do themselves. That's what Tori and Newland said. We almost laughed out loud. So what you're saying, Tori and Noland, if for example, you were funding secret bio labs in Ukraine, but wanted to hide that fact from the people who are paying for it in whose name you were doing it, then you might lie about it by claiming the Russians were lying about it. In other words, you might mount a disinformation campaign by claiming the other guy was mounting a disinformation campaign. Is that what you're saying, Tory Noland? It's pretty funny. What's not funny is that this is all entirely real. We invited Marco Rubio on the show tonight to tell us what he knows about these biolabs. He declined to come. That invitation remains open. In the meantime, let's review what little we do know about this. We're gonna start with a spokesman for the Russian defense ministry on Sunday. Now we would never do this. We never played anything like this on the show before because, of course, we're Americans, and we wanna know what's going on. We ask our own officials, the people we elect and whose salaries we pay because it's our country. We don't go to foreign sources because we trust our own sources first. But when it turns out the people who represent us and run our government are lying to us and never apologize for it and doing horrific things in our names, then you have to open your mind a little bit and at least assess what other people are saying. So here was the Russian claim. Watch. Speaker 3: During the course of the special military operation, facts were uncovered at the Kyiv regime mopping up traces of military biological program under development in Ukraine financed by the US Defense Ministry. Okay. Speaker 0: So that apparently, we hadn't seen that until this afternoon. We started poking around. That may have been the root of the conspiracy theories that the fact checks told us were Russian disinformation. Let's quote it. Military biological programs are under development in Ukraine financed by the US defense ministry. That's the Russian claim. Separately, a Russian foreign ministry spokesman said the Ukrainians are working on deadly pathogens including plague and anthrax. Is that true? Now, obviously, we would not take Russia's word for that ever, but we don't have to take Russia's word for that. The US defense department has a website that contains this media clip about the opening of a biological research facility in Ukraine in 02/2010. Quote, US Senator Dick Lugar applauded the opening of the in interim central reference laboratory in Odessa, Ukraine this week, announcing that it will be instrumental in researching dangerous pathogens used by bioterrorists. The level three biosafety lab will be used to study anthrax, tullemaria, and Q fever as well as other dangerous pathogens. Oh, okay. Then the national pulse dug up, 2011 report from the US National Academy of Sciences that also explained that the Odessa based laboratory, quote, is responsible for the identification of especially dangerous biological pathogens. So what we're doing, this is not the first time you've heard this story. We are funding the creation of deadly pathogens so we can study them and prevent people from getting infected with them, maybe. There are lots of examples of this. The US embassy in Ukraine has a handy web page explaining that American and Ukrainian scientists have worked on a whole bunch of different experiments like this. Some of the projects include work on African swine fever virus, hemorrhagic fever virus, and various avian rep respiratory viruses. The interesting thing, the telling thing, is that the US embassy's website also contains links to fact sheets about America's support for biological research in Ukraine, but all those links are now dead. That's weird. It's our government. We pay for it. Again, they're there in our name, in in the name of American citizens, but we can no longer read their web page. How does that work exactly? They have no right to lie to us. The web page is archived, thankfully, and the fact sheet show defense department funding to laboratories in Ukraine. So that looks like proof. It's not Russian disinformation. It's totally real. Sorry, USA Today, America's newspaper. It's real. You can look it up on the Internet if you want. In the face of that evidence, the Pentagon is still lying about it. And in fact, they're repeating the same unbelievably stupid and now thoroughly discredited lies the fact checkers have told for weeks now. Here's the spokesman for the Pentagon, John Kirby, today. Speaker 4: The Russian accusations, are absurd. They're laughable. And, you know, in the words of my Irish Catholic grandfather, a bunch of malarkey. There's nothing to it. It's classic rush Russian propaganda. And, and, I wouldn't, if I were you, I I wouldn't give it, I wouldn't give it a drop of ink worth worth paying attention to. Speaker 0: Yeah. But but, can you explain to us what it has there been any relationship between the We are not Speaker 4: not developing biological or chemical weapons inside Ukraine. It's not happening. Speaker 0: If I were you, I wouldn't devote a drop of ink to it. First of all, you didn't get to make that decision, mister bureaucrat. We have a free press in this country. You don't get to decide. But you'll notice at the end of that, Kirby refuses to answer the question. Has there been a relationship between the US Pentagon and a bioweapons facility in Ukraine? And if so, what is that relationship? That's Russian disinformation. What's the answer? We're not developing WMD in Ukraine right now. Okay. Got it. But why are we funding this, and what exactly are we funding? We reached out to the state department separately, and they provided us with this very carefully worded statement. Quote, the US Department of Defense does not own or operate biological laboratories in Ukraine. Not that anyone said they did. Continuing the quote, under secretary Nuland was referring to Ukrainian diagnostic and biodefense laboratories during her testimony, which are not biological weapons facilities. What's the difference exactly? Continuing the quote. These institutions counter biological threats throughout the country, end quote. So that means nothing. You could describe our nuclear stockpile correctly as defensive. Our nuclear weapons are not designed to preemptively kill anybody. They're designed to prevent other people from killing us, but they're still nuclear weapons. So why don't you stop lying and telling us what's going on here? And why don't you more specifically tell us why you didn't secure these materials. So, yes, we're funding secret biolabs in Ukraine, but they're diagnostic and biodefense laboratories that counter biological threats. Okay. If these are purely defensive labs, why was Tory and Nuland so concerned that Russians would get a hold of the materials from these facilities? Other world powers have come to the obvious conclusion. Again, we hate to do this, but under these circumstances, we asked our own spokespeople. They lied. We're going to the foreign ministry of China, a country we despise. Here's what they said today. They're calling on weapons inspectors to take a look at these facilities in Ukraine right away. Speaker 5: Over the past two decades, the United States has been blocking the establishment of a verification regime to the biological weapons convention and refused to accept the inspection of biological facilities within and outside its borders. The move has further aggravated the concern of the international community. We once again urge The US to provide full clarification of its biomilitarization activities within and outside its borders and accept multilateral verification. Speaker 0: Oh, they're putting Russian Chinese propaganda on the screen. Yeah. We did. We also put US government propaganda on the screen. And the difference is we expect to be lied to by foreign governments. We're not globalists. We believe in one country. It's this country, The United States. We do not expect to be lied to by our government, and we won't accept it. But let's get to the substance of what the Chinese government just said, and we never agree with the Chinese government on anything. But in this case, they make a fair point. We now know that dangerous biological agents, whether you call them weapons or not, is completely irrelevant because they can be used as weapons. Is it gun a weapon? Not when you're quail hunting. When you're in a gunfight, it is. It's a ridiculous semantic debate. Dangerous biological agents remain, thanks to the Biden administration, unsecured in a chaotic war zone. At some point, we need to know how that happened, who made those decisions. We have a right to know. And let's hope someone in congress, apparently not Marco Rubio, but someone else will get to the bottom of it. But in the meantime, we pray that somewhere in the United States government, there is an adult who cares enough to get this situation under control immediately. Hey, Sean Hannity here. Hey. Click here to subscribe to Fox News YouTube page and catch our hottest interviews and most compelling analysis. You will not get it anywhere else.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/KqNRJgNdJ2

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

If you Were Curious Why Igor Kirillov Was Just Assassinated Facts You Probably Didn’t Know Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov, after being one of the first in the world (in a serious government position) to directly say that the coronavirus was artificially created, who sent documents to the Pentagon and asked them about their biolaboratories in Ukraine, who revealed that the West was dumping nuclear waste there, that Kiev was preparing to make a "dirty bomb."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Russian Ministry of Defense continues to analyze US military-biological activities in Ukraine and other regions, adding names to the list of those involved in Pentagon-funded biological research. These individuals include officials from the US Department of Defense, contractors, biotech corporations, and Ukrainian entities. The US is allegedly collecting data on experienced personnel and seeking new specialists in weapons of mass destruction through the Ukrainian Science and Technology Center (STCU). Courses with dual-purpose research experience are offered, potentially for preparing biological weapons provocations. The US Department of Defense's DTRA is engaging biologists from Ukraine, Central Asia, and the Caucasus, with projects funded through grants managed by the STCU. The US is also accused of downplaying the risks of COVID-19 vaccines and continuing biological programs in Ukraine under a new name, "Research on Biosurveillance," to deflect criticism.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Министерство обороны Российской Федерации продолжает анализ военно-биологической деятельности США и их союзников на Украине и в других регионах мира. Ранее мы уже приводили имена участников американских военно-биологических программ, В их числе должностные лица Министерства обороны США, подрядных организаций Пентагона, американских биотехнологических корпораций, государственных институтов и частных компаний Украины. Сегодня мы дополняем список фигурантов биологических исследований Пентагона. В их числе: Элио Джейкоб Сперлман руководитель неправительственной организации Международный институт проблем ВИЧ и туберкулёза в Киеве. Принимал непосредственное участие в создании лабораторной базы для реализации военно-биологических исследований на территории Украины. Грег Гласс Профессор института новых патогенов при Университете штата Флорида. Занимался изучением распространения возбудителей туриаремии на Украине. Привлекался к реализации проекта юпи-8, распространению вирусов конвик-крымской геморрагической лихорадки и хантавирусов на Украине. Эндрю Стэнли Пекас, профессор молекулярной микробиологии и иммунологии в Школе общественного здравоохранения при Университете Джонса Хопкинса. Привлекался в качестве одного из ведущих консультантов к проекту UP2 применения геноинформационных систем, удаленного наблюдения и лабораторной диагностики за выявлением заболеваний толиоремии сибирской язвы людей и животных на Украине. В числе исполнителей американских военно-биологических проектов граждане Украины Наталья Родина, заместитель генерального директора Государственного учреждения Киевский областной лабораторный центр Минздрава Украины и бывший сотрудник американской компании Black&Wich. С 2020 года является советником командующего медицинскими силами ВСУ по вопросам лабораторной диагностики. Елена Нестерова, директор Украинского института исследований проблем общественного здравоохранения, координировала деятельность компании Лабиринт Глобал Хеалс, осуществляла взаимодействие между госорганами Украины и компанией Метобиота. Скрываясь от ответственности за участие в военно-биологических проектах, многие фигуранты покинули территорию Украины. Для предотвращения возможной утечки сведений о незаконной деятельности Пентагона американская администрация предпринимает экстренные меры по их розыску и возвращению. Через Украинский научно-технический центр осуществляется работа по двум направлениям: сбор данных о местонахождении сотрудников, уже имеющих опыт участия в так называемых украинских проектах, а также поиск новых специалистов в области разработки оружия массового поражения. Обратите ваше внимание на распространяемую через сайт Плантация анкету для обучаемых на специальных курсах. При этом обязательным условием участия в них является наличие опыта в исследованиях двойного назначения. В период с 24 по 26 апреля 2023 года с отобранными кандидатами пройдёт онлайн-обучение. Параллельно планируется внизать очную встречу в Варшаве. Ходе сборов участникам будет предложено продолжить работу над закрытыми проектами на украинской территории и за её пределами. Мы не исключаем, что под видом подобных курсов будут проводиться мероприятия по подготовке провокаций с биологическим оружием и развёртывания информационной кампании против Российской Федерации. Для реализации поставленных задач Управления по снижению угрозы Минобороны США Дитра задействует потенциал учёных-биологов не только из Украины, но и государств Средней Азии и Закавказья. Работа в этом направлении спланирована американской администрацией на период по меньшей мере до 2025 года. Финансирование проектов военного назначения осуществляется американским военным ведомством с помощью системы грантов. Распределение денежных средств возложено на НТЦ и Международный научно-технический центр. Возглавляет данную организацию бывший руководитель Агентства по контролю за вооружением США Рональд Лемон. Хотелось бы обратить внимание на названия отдельных проектов НТЦ без указания их территориальной принадлежности. Проект 2410 Оценка природной устойчивости возбудителя бруцеллёза у домашних и диких животных. Направлен на изучение возможности передачи этого опасного патогена человеку. Примечательно, что исследование проводилось при участии специалистов Университета Флориды. В рамках проекта 2513 изучаются факторы риска и молекулярные свойства устойчивых во внешней среде вирулентных энтербактерий. Исследование направлено выделение штаммов микроорганизмов, невосприимчивых ко всем известным классам антибиотиков. Проект 2545 предусматривает моделирование эволюционных изменений отдельных видов вирусов, буньявирусов, высоко патогенных для человека. При этом исследования по комбинирунию генетических материалов опасных патогенов планируется проводить при поддержке Национального агентства по исследованиям и инновациям Великобритании. Напомню, что целью реализуемой ИМТЦ программой снижения биологической угрозы является защита США, их вооружённых сил и союзников. Это в очередной раз подтверждает, что Вашингтон рассматривает постсоветское пространство, как плацдарм для развёртывания воинских подразделений НАТО. На примере Украины мы видим, что навязанное коллективным Западом финансирование военно-биологических программ приводит к утрате национального биологического суверенитета и подрыву собственного научно-технического потенциала в сфере биологической, продовольственной и фармацевтической безопасности. Министерство обороны РФ ранее информировало о проведении американскими фармкомпаниями, так называемой Биг Фармой, исследований направленной эволюции, а также о коррупции и сговоре с госструктурами США, связанным с разработкой и производством вакцинных препаратов. Было отмечено, что представители регулирующих органов лоббируют коммерческие интересы компании в ущерб текущим стандартам безопасности и качества. Давая решение на использование препаратов без прохождения контрольных процедур, чиновники федеральных агентств впоследствии занимают ключевые должности в фармацевтических компаниях. В их числе: Бывшие сотрудники Управления по надзору за качеством продуктов и медикаментов Министерства здравоохранения США Марк Макленнон, действующий член совета директоров компании Johnson Johnson Скотт Готтлиб, член совета директоров компании Pfizer Стивен Хан, главный врач компании Flagship Pyonning, непосредственно связанная с Moderna. По имеющей у нас информации, сговор между чиновниками и производителями антиковидной вакцины Pfizer позволил запустить в обращение препарата с серьёзными побочными эффектами. При этом на момент одобрения вакцины у Pfizer были реальные доказательства, подтверждающие повышенный риск серьёзных патологий сердечно-сосудистой системы после вакцинации. В закрытом отчёте компании говорится, цитата: Имеются данные, свидетельствующие о том, что пациенты, получающие вакцины от COVID-19, подвергаются повышенному риску развития миокардита. С апреля 2021 года Moderna сообщила о росте случаев миокардита и перикардита в Соединённых Штатах после вакцинации с использованием мРНК вакцин, особенно у подростков мужского пола и молодых людей старше 16 лет. Патологические изменения обычно наступали в течение нескольких дней после вакцинации, и чаще возникали после получения второй дозы. Конец цитаты. Напомню, подобные исследования высокотоксичных препаратов с неизученным риском побочных эффектов проводились по заказу Дитра на украинских гражданах и военнослужащих ВСУ без учёта каких бы то ни было этических норм. Складывается впечатление, что для американской фармпромышленности, имеющей целью получения максимальной прибыли, подобный подход является нормой, а его организация всячески поддерживается Демократической партией США. Министерство обороны уже отмечало противоречивые заявления представителей политических элит США о прекращении работ Пентагона в биолабораториях на территории Украины. Обратите внимание на протокол совещания рабочей группы американских и украинских специалистов под руководством представителей Дитра от 20 октября 2022 года по планам реализации программы снижения биологических угроз на Украине. Согласно документу, несмотря на вынужденную паузу, связанную с проведением специальной военной операции, в настоящее время деятельность в рамках программы возобновлена. Основными задачами на данном этапе является продолжение строительства биолабораторий на Украине, а также расширение формата подготовки украинских специалистов-биологов. Озвученные Министерством обороны России факты военно-биологической деятельности Пентагона заставляют Вашингтон предпринимать усилия по сокрытию истинного характера проводимых работ. Так, решено изменить название программы Совместные биологические исследования, которая фактически направлена на разработку компонентов биологического оружия. В протоколе отмечено, что программа получила новое название Исследование по бионадзору. В соответствии с документам, военное ведомство намерено продолжать исследование опасных патогенов, расширять сбор биологических материалов и отправлять их в Соединенные Штаты. Планы Пентагона по продолжению исследования двойного назначения на украинских биообъектах и в других странах мира со сменой названия программы это результат невнятной реакции мирового сообщества из-за боязни ряда стран идти на конфронтацию с американскими властями. Госдепартамент США подготовил серию публикаций, в которых пытаются поставить под сомнение документально подтверждённые факты своих незаконных биологических исследований. Так, 14 марта 2023 года на сайте Госдепартамента США был опубликован бюллетень, где Россия вновь обвиняется в дезинформации. В попытке отвести удар от Демократической партии США проправительственные американские СМИ, в том числе Вашингтон пост, распространились заявления Госдепартамента, в которых напрочь отрицаются установленные исторические факты подготовки военно-биологических атак на территории Северной Кореи и Китая в начале 50-х годов прошлого века. А озвученная Минобороны России информация игнорируется. США исходит из логики того, что если не удалось доказать более ранние эпизоды, то ведь все обвинения в сегодняшней военно-биологической деятельности являются дезинформацией. Необходимо отметить, что США никогда чётко не заявляют своих обязательств в области безопасности исследований в подконтрольных им биолабораториях. Непрозрачность их деятельности создаёт риск распространения опасных патогенов в районах размещения биообъектов. В связи с этим в августе 2021 года южнокорейская общественная организация подала в суд на биологическую лабораторию Форт-Детрика и Вооруженные силы США в Корее за контрабанду токсичных веществ на американские военные базы в нарушении внутреннего законодательства. Судебный иск связан с тем, что американское командование в Корее в период с ноября 2017 года по январь 2019 года незаконно возили опасные вещества на свои военные базы. 5 апреля 2022 года жители Южной Кореи вышли на улицу в знак протеста против биологических лабораторий США рядом с их военной базой Пусане. Общественные акции протеста в Корее далеко не единичный случай. Ранее массовые выступления против деятельности американских лабораторий прошли в Армении, Киргизии и Сербии. В конце февраля 2023 года международный секретарь рабочей партии Ирландии Гэри Грейнджер, выступая на конференции Усиление угрозы применения НАТО биологического оружия на фоне обострения международных противоречий заявил, что угроза применения такого вида оружия массового поражения растет с каждым днем. Грейнджер упомянул: Украина располагает биологическими лабораториями, финансируемыми в США. Это может привести к миллионам жертв, включая риск несчастного случая. Конец цитаты. Как мы неоднократно отмечали, перенос наиболее опасных исследований за пределы национальной территории является частью стратегии Соединенных Штатов в сфере биологической безопасности. При этом размещение биообъектов в третьих странах не учитывает интересы местного населения и представляет серьёзную угрозу для целых регионов. Хотел бы обратить ваше внимание на заявления одного из федеральных министерств США о том, что пандемия COVID-19 могла произойти в результате утечки вируса из лаборатории в городе Ухань. В заявлении подчёркивается, цитата: Заболевание имеет лабораторное происхождение, и вирус, скорее всего, распространёнся в результате несчастного случая. Конец цитаты. Нюанс заключается в том, что с данным заявлением выступило Министерство энергетики. Возникает закономерный вопрос: какое отношение Министерство энергетики США имеет в борьбе с биологическими угрозами и резот проекты, имеющие признаки двойного назначения. Министерство обороны России считает, что Министерство энергетики США наравне с Пентагоном является основным организатором и непосредственным участником военно-биологической деятельности. Только официально в 2023 году Министерство энергетики США выделило 105 миллионов долларов на исследование в рамках проекта Виртуальная среда исследований в области подготовки к биоугрозам, в ходе которой предполагается изучить эпидемическое распространение заболевания. Обращаю ваше внимание, что у специалистов остаётся ряд вопросов, связанных с, мягко говоря, странными для большинства вирусов изменчивостью и географическим происхождением вариантов COVID-19. Например, штамм Бета впервые появился в ЮАР и был выявлен в Великобритании в декабре 2020 года. Штамм Гамма в Бразилии в январе 2021 года. Дельта в Индии в июне 2021 года. При этом каждый новый вариант обладал улучшенными свойствами с точки зрения их военно-биологического применения, нанося всё больший экономический ущерб. Несмотря на крайне жёсткие антиковидные меры, появление в 2022 году субвариантов штамма омикрон BA 5.2 и BF7 вызвало лавинообразный рост заболевших в Китае. Создаётся впечатление, что кем-то предпринимаются целенаправленные действия по усилению патогенных свойств вируса, а пандемия искусственно подпитываться посредством вброса новых, усовершенствованных вариантов. Пока эти вопросы остаются без ответа. Кроме того, поступающая информация свидетельствует, что руководство Соединённых Штатов продолжает привлекать непрофильное государственное ведомство, не имеющее прямого отношения к сфере здравоохранения, к реализации военно-биологических программ, отводя внимание от главного бенефициара Пентагона. Более подробно о деятельности Министерства энергетики США в области биологии двойного назначения мы расскажем в следующий раз.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/5gWVaP3fsx

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Visiting Ukrainian biolab In March 2022, Russian ambassador to the UN, Vassily Nebenzia, presented a report that detailed a network of 30 biological weapons labs in Ukraine. With each passing day, volunteers uncover new evidence of illegal activities related to the development of biological weapons in the liberated territories of Donbass. Oksana, an officer from Lugansk, serves in a special unit whose aim is to gather more evidence of the existence of secret US bioweapons factories. ‘The adverse reactions and fatalities that occurred here were all covered up, as evidenced by the removed records and locals testifying that very often, large black plastic bags were hauled out of here, and rather bizarre deaths occurred’, she says.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I hide my face due to my job. For almost a year, my team has gathered evidence on secret US labs in Ukraine, suspected by the Russian interior ministry of testing biological weapons. When the Ukrainian army retreated, we tried but failed to remove all materials. Investigators found evidence of deadly viruses and patient test paperwork in the abandoned lab. We don't know how many centers have been established in Ukraine over the past eight years, but the Russian military has found signs of them in most liberated major settlements. Many people worldwide are trying to find out who created this bioweapons factory network, how long it has operated, where, and how many deaths it's responsible for.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This woman hides her face and identity because of the nature of her job. She's been working for almost a year in her team gathering evidence on the existence of secret US labs in Ukraine. The Russian interior ministry suspects they were used to test biological weapons. Before the Ukrainian army retreated, Lamstav tried to remove all materials and documents, but they failed. In the abandoned lab, investigators found evidence of operations with deadly viruses and paperwork for tests on unnamed patients. It's unknown how many similar centers have been established in Ukraine over the past eight years, but the Russian military found signs of them in almost all liberated major settlements. Like Oksana, many people around the world are trying to find answers to the question. Who created this network of bioweapons factories? Ukraine has, biological research facilities. For how long and where has it operated? And how many deaths is it responsible for?

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/ZikApSQuQ0

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

‼️US Military whistleblower LT Scott Bennet drops bombshell on Ukrainian Bio-weapons Labs: “It originally started in 2005 with the Defence Intelligence Agency…which created a 501 C3…called the Global Viral Forecasting Institute…with a Mossad Operative named Nathan Wolfe…which became Metabiota. This was funded by Rosemont , an investment firm, where Hunter Biden was the head of…along with Christopher Heinz (John Kerry’s son) and Paul Pelosi…Nancy Pelosi’s son. The West has been developing this under Obama and Biden for the last 10 years for the purposes of generating Biological and Chemical Warfare to use against the Russians, which is why they’ve been collecting DNA samples from Slavic People. Revelations of a Massive War Crime…Crimes Against Humanity …as it’s a violation of the Global Biological Weapons Agreement. This shows America with its 30 BIOLABS in Ukraine was involved in the experimentation on Human to Animal Transmission…which is precisely the origin of ‘Covid-19’."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Over a year ago, we knew about the biolabs, their experiments, and related documents. It started in 2005 with the Defense Intelligence Agency, which created the Global Viral Forecasting Institute with Nathaniel Wolf, later Meta Biota. Rosemont Fonseca, an investment firm headed by Hunter Biden, Christopher Hines, and Paul Pelosi Jr., funded Meta Biota. This is a corrupt operation developed over the last decade to generate biological warfare against the Russians. They've been collecting DNA from Slavic people. General Igor Krylyov exposed this as a war crime because it violates the biological weapons agreement. America's 30 biolabs in Ukraine experimented on animal-to-human transmission, which is the origin of COVID-19. The research conducted in Ukraine will be directly connected to COVID-19. The United States created and opened this Pandora's box.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We knew over a year ago about these biolabs and their experiments and the documents. We knew about the contractors. We knew about it originally starting in 02/2005 with the Defense Intelligence Agency that then created a five zero one c three called the Global Viral Forecasting Institute with, a Zionist Mossad operative named Nathaniel Wolf that then became Meta Biota to make it more of a harmless name. And that Meta Biota was being funded by Rosemont Fonseca, an investment firm that ironically enough, Hunter Biden, the son of Joe Biden, was the head of along with, Christopher Hines, who was the son of John Kerry and Paul Pelosi Junior, the son of Nancy Pelosi. So this is a, incestuous, corrupt, criminal racketeering operation that the West has been developing under Obama, under Biden, under, you know, for the last ten years for the purposes of generating DNA biological chemical warfare to use against the Russians. That's why they've been collecting DNA samples from Slavic people. And, of course, all of the documents and the evidence that general Igor Krylyov has found and commented on are all being exposed as revelations of a massive really war crime, crime against humanity because it's a violation of the global biological chemical weapons agreement. It's, really showing that, America with its 30 bio labs in Ukraine was involved in experimentation on animal to human transmission, which is precisely the origin of COVID nineteen. So I think you're going to see all of this research that was conducted in Ukraine being directly connected to COVID nineteen. And there you have the Pandora's box that was created and opened by The United States Of America.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/H8cuo1AuRA

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

About 40 American biolabs in Ukraine worked directly with the Pentagon. Why was General Igor Kirillov killed? https://t.co/jXGxDztLtC

Video Transcript AI Summary
We know that approximately 40-plus laboratories directly worked with the Pentagon. More than a dozen have ceased operation, likely due to our influence. Some were relocated to other territories and continued their activities. I cannot say that the biological program in Ukraine has been completely shut down. There's a misconception about what military biological research entails. It's not like the infamous Japanese Unit 731. It's much simpler in some ways and more complex in others, involving advanced research and artificial intelligence. These so-called garage laboratories have kits that can synthesize viruses. All of this is integrated into a single information system, ultimately controlled by the same entities, whether it's the Pentagon or other organizations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Мы знаем, что приблизительно количество лабораторий, которые непосредственно работало с Пентагоном, порядка 40 с небольшим, с большой долей вероятности больше десятка перестали работать, функционировать, это непосредственно под нашим влиянием, часть была вывезена и продолжена их деятельность на других территориях. Я не могу сказать, что программа биологическая на территории Украины свернута, потому что сейчас немножко у людей не совсем правильное восприятие, что такое биологические разработки военного назначения. Да, вот не могли бы об этом уяснить. Думают, что это как в японском отряде 731-м, все далеко не так, все гораздо проще, где-то проще, где-то труднее, это высокие разработки, притом на уровне искусственного интеллекта, его внедрения в этом направлении. Это так называемая гаражная лаборатория, ряд наборов, которые позволяют синтезировать те или иные, даже вирусы, все это объединяется в единую информационную систему, во главе стоят мы понимаем кто, лица те же, то это Пентагон, то ли это какие-то другие организации.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/gJgXHsntw0

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Russian General Igor Kirillov, head of Russias Radiation, Chemical, and Biological Defense Troops, who exposed US backed Biolabs in Ukraine, has been murdered in Moscow. $2.4 billion fund under Hunter Biden involved in financing US-backed biolabs in Ukraine https://t.co/y66Q6w0oIa

Video Transcript AI Summary
Incoming materials let us connect the interaction scheme of US bodies with Ukrainian bio-objects. The involvement in the announcement of the mentioned activity of structures close to the current US leadership draws attention, in particular, the Rozmond Seneca Investment Fund, which is managed by Hunter. All this activity is carried out under the full control of the Pentagon.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Поступающие материалы позволяют просоединить схему взаимодействия органов США с украинскими биообъектами, обращать на себя внимание причастность к анонсированию указанной деятельности структур, близких к нынешнему руководству США, частности, инвестиционного фонда Розмонд Сенека, которым руководит Хантер Вся эта деятельность осуществляется под полным контролем Пентагона.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/erT3FXrbX5

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Victoria Nuland was asked whether 🇺🇦 has bioweapons "Ukraine has biological research facilities, which in fact we are now quite concerned Russian troops, Russian forces, may be seeking to gain control of" Russian government has been saying all along, that US are funding Biolabs 🇺🇸BIDEN, CLINTON, SOROS GROUPS BEHIND BIOWEAPON TESTING IN UKRAINE: Bombshell details from Russian Defense Ministry which unveils huge Democrat Party members and backers behind programs to make bioweapons in Ukraine and across globe. Briefing on illegal Pentagon bioweapon programmes in 🇺🇦Since 2018, it has been known that the Pentagon is collecting specifically RNA/DNA for 'research' "Over 2-3 generations [of DNA-based bioweapons], such changes take place that they fully replace the original look" - Putin VICTORIA NULAND: Ukraine has biological research facilities, which, in fact, we are now quite concerned russian troops, russian forces may be seeking to gain control of. So we are working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of russian forces should they approach.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ukraine has biological research facilities that we are concerned Russian forces may try to control. We are collaborating with the Ukrainians to secure these research materials and prevent them from falling into Russian hands.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ukraine has biological research facilities, which in fact we are now quite concerned Russian troops, Russian forces may be seeking to gain control of. So we are working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of Russian forces should they approach.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/6SJ0W7U8lK

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

❗️Future Director of US National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard: There are 25+ US-funded biolabs in Ukraine. These labs need to be shut down immediatly. The US funds 300 biolabs around the world. https://t.co/1QmHxLj0EG

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are 25 to 30 US-funded biolabs in Ukraine researching dangerous pathogens. As Ukraine is an active war zone, these labs could be compromised, releasing deadly pathogens that know no borders. To protect people worldwide, these labs must be shut down immediately, and their pathogens destroyed. The Biden-Harris administration should work with Russia, Ukraine, NATO, and the UN to implement a ceasefire near these labs until they're secured and the pathogens are destroyed. The US funds around 300 biolabs globally, some engaging in risky gain-of-function research, similar to the Wuhan lab. These labs should have been shut down two years ago. This isn't a partisan issue; the administration and Congress must act now for global health and well-being.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here are the undeniable facts. There are 25 to 30 US funded bio labs in Ukraine. According to the US government, these bio labs are conducting research on dangerous pathogens. Ukraine is in an active war zone with widespread bombing, artillery, and shelling, and these facilities, even in the best of circumstances, could easily be compromised and release these deadly pathogens. Now like COVID, these pathogens know no borders. If they are inadvertently or purposely breached or compromised, they will quickly spread all throughout Europe, The United States and the rest of the world, causing untold suffering and death. So in order to protect the American people, the people of Europe, the people around the world, these labs need to be shut down immediately, and the pathogens that they hold need to be destroyed. Instead of trying to cover this up, the Biden Harris administration needs to work with Russia, Ukraine, NATO, the UN to immediately implement a ceasefire for all military action in the vicinity of these labs until they're secured and these pathogens are destroyed. Now in addition to all this, The U. S. Funds around 300 biolabs around the world who are engaging in dangerous research, including gain of function, similar to the lab in Wuhan where COVID nineteen may have originated from. Now after realizing how dangerous and vulnerable these labs are, they should have all been shut down two years ago. But they haven't. Now this is not a partisan political issue. The administration and Congress need to act now for the health and well-being of every American and every person on this planet.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/g7VS3fExYS

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov, after being one of the first in the world (in a serious government position) to directly say that the coronavirus was artificially created. Lt Gen Kirillov was assassinated by the MI6/SBU - on behalf of Big Pharma Control the world through artificially created biological crises

Video Transcript AI Summary
There's an increase in unusual infections in several countries. Is this connected to American biologists? Considering the damage from COVID-19 compared to something like World War II, the pandemic's impact has been far greater. Big Pharma, mainly based in the United States, has greatly benefited. We're raising questions and providing documents, but the US hasn't refuted any of the documents we've presented, which amounts to over 2000 pages to the United Nations. The US response is typically standard, claiming everything is done in the interest of their national security and that we should trust them. They're pursuing global biological control, realizing that artificially created biological crises can be used to manage the world, and even seemingly free aid comes with strings attached.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Рост заболеваемости не характерными инфекциями отмечен в данный момент в ряде стран. То есть тоже мы можем говорить о том, что это не без помощи американских биологов? Speaker 1: Я думаю, что вот так огульно заявлять мы же все-таки должностные лица. Ведь биологическое оружие, если посчитать, какой ущерб нанес ковид, то наверное за два года. Speaker 0: Основная пандемия два года Speaker 1: шла. Даже ее нельзя сравнить с ущербом, который был во Вторую Мировую войну. Это в десятки раз больше. Зато выгодоприобретатели той же Биг Фармы Speaker 0: -Вы имеете ввиду фармацевтические компании? Speaker 1: -С компанией, которые в основном находятся у нас в Соединенных Штатах, это там колоссальные. -То есть вопрос? Вопрос стоит. Вопросы мы задаем, мы же передаем документы. Характерна реакция Соединенных Штатов Америки, про которую мы говорим. Ни одного опровержения тем документам, которые мы предъявили, не было. Мы передали документы, это более, наверное, 2000 листов в Организацию Объединенных Наций. Speaker 0: Какой ответ пришел? -У Speaker 1: нас, как правило, два ответа. Один ответ происходит в Соединенных Штатах Америки. У них же он стандартный. Все, что ни делается, все делается в интересах национальной безопасности Соединенных Штатов, и нам надо доверять. Speaker 0: -Смепо доверяете? Speaker 1: -Да, Смепо доверяет. Там политика глобального биологического контроля. Они поняли, что это работает, что посредством искусственно создаваемых таких кризисных ситуаций биологического характера можно управлять миром. Ведь ничего бесплатно они не делают. И даже поставляя каким-то государствам на безвозмездной основе она не такая безвозмездная, как они об этом говорят
Saved - January 2, 2025 at 12:33 AM

@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen

“Here are the undeniable facts” There are 25-30 US Funded Bio labs in Ukraine. Listen to Trumps Director for National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard explain. What you seriously thought this was just another Conspiracy Theory? Now ask yourself why Legacy Media NEVER told you about this?

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are 25 to 30 US-funded biolabs in Ukraine conducting research on dangerous pathogens. Given the ongoing war, these facilities are at risk of being compromised, potentially leading to the spread of deadly pathogens across Europe and beyond. To protect global health, these labs must be shut down immediately, and the pathogens destroyed. The Biden administration should collaborate with Russia, Ukraine, NATO, and the UN to establish a ceasefire around these labs until they are secured. Additionally, the US funds approximately 300 biolabs worldwide that are also engaged in similar research.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here are the undeniable facts. There are 25 to 30 US funded biolabs in Ukraine. According to the US government, these biolabs are conducting research on dangerous pathogens. Ukraine is in an active war zone with widespread bombing, artillery, and shelling, and these facilities, even in the best of circumstances, could easily be compromised and release these deadly pathogens. Now like COVID, these pathogens know no borders. If they are inadvertently or purposely breached or compromised, they will quickly spread all throughout Europe, the United States, and the rest of the world, causing untold suffering and death. So in order to protect the American people, the people of Europe, the people around the world, these labs need to be shut down immediately, and the pathogens that they hold need to be destroyed. Instead of trying to cover this up, the Biden Harris administration needs to work with Russia, Ukraine, NATO, the UN to immediately implement a ceasefire for all military action in the vicinity of these labs until they're secured and these pathogens are destroyed. In addition to all this, the US funds around 300 biolabs around the world who are engaged
Saved - February 3, 2025 at 3:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve come across some startling revelations. Elon Musk has confirmed that USAID used taxpayer money for COVID-19 development, linking back to 2014 when Joe Biden pardoned Anthony Fauci. This year marks when Obama and Fauci took control of Ukraine's biolabs, coinciding with the CIA's involvement in Ukraine's government takeover. Tucker Carlson raised concerns about the dangers posed by these biolabs, suggesting they could destabilize the world. It seems the connections between these events are significant and troubling.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

BREAKING: The “Conspiracy theorists” were right Elon Musk just CONFIRMED USAID used US taxpayer money to fund COVID 19 development This also CONFIRMS why Joe Biden chose the year 2014 for the Anthony Fauci pardon, that’s when Barack Obama and Fauci took over the Ukraine Biolabs and started working on these bio weapons This is Crimes Against Humanity and that can’t be pardoned 2014 was the year The CIA took over the Ukraine Government - Under US “supervision”, Ukraine fell into civil war in February 2014 (Obama) It’s all connected Tucker Carlson talking about Ukraine biolabs “what are they doing with the pathogens in those bio labs?” “So that's like the scariest thing that's ever happened. — The potential to destabilize the world more than anything that's happened in my lifetime.” Democrats have been involved with Ukraine biolabs since The CIA overthrew the Ukraine Government It’s the whole reason Ukraine was chosen for the war, it’s the reason why Anthony Fauci was pardoned back until 2014 The dates match perfectly

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Ukrainian military is reportedly selling about half of the arms received from the U.S. on international black markets, with some ending up in Latin American drug cartels. This includes dangerous conventional weapons that could threaten commercial air travel. There are concerns about the pathogens in biolabs in Ukraine, and whether the Biden administration has a clear record of what's in those labs. It appears they do not intend to share this information with the Trump administration. The situation in Ukraine has the potential to destabilize the world more than anything seen in recent history, which raises significant alarm.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, the thing that people don't in this country understand is that the Ukrainian military is selling about half of the arms they get from the United States into international black markets, and they're winding up, in some case, with the drug cartels in Latin America. That's a fact. Okay. It's a fact. And you can you can buy them. And I spoke to someone who did buy some actually, so I know I know this is a fact, and they're bragging about it. So they're selling conventional weapons, including weapon systems that are very dangerous and very destabilizing that would make commercial air travel impossible, for example. And so what do they get doing with the pathogens in those biolabs? And does the Biden administration have a manifest? Do they know exactly what's in those labs? And will they turn it over to the Trump administration so we can keep track of these things? And the answer is no, actually. The answer is no. I know this. Wow. So that's, like, the scariest thing that's ever happened. I think the Ukraine war has the potential to destabilize the world more than anything that's happened in my lifetime. What the hell? So that's why I'm saying this right now because I hope this is widely disseminated because I think it's, like, the scariest thing I've heard in a long, long time.
Saved - February 3, 2025 at 3:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation centers on claims that USAID used taxpayer money to fund COVID-19 development, linking this to Joe Biden's 2014 pardon of Anthony Fauci. It suggests that Fauci and Barack Obama were involved in Ukraine biolabs during a time of civil unrest, implying a connection to bioweapons. The discussion highlights concerns about the potential dangers of pathogens in these labs and asserts that Democrats have been involved since the CIA's influence in Ukraine. A response confirms the lab leak theory, attributing it to China.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

BREAKING: The “Conspiracy theorists” were right Elon Musk just CONFIRMED USAID used US taxpayer money to fund COVID 19 development This also CONFIRMS why Joe Biden chose the year 2014 for the Anthony Fauci pardon, that’s when Barack Obama and Fauci took over the Ukraine Biolabs and started working on these bio weapons This is Crimes Against Humanity and that can’t be pardoned 2014 was the year The CIA took over the Ukraine Government - Under US “supervision”, Ukraine fell into civil war in February 2014 (Obama) It’s all connected Tucker Carlson talking about Ukraine biolabs “what are they doing with the pathogens in those bio labs?” “So that's like the scariest thing that's ever happened. — The potential to destabilize the world more than anything that's happened in my lifetime.” Democrats have been involved with Ukraine biolabs since The CIA overthrew the Ukraine Government It’s the whole reason Ukraine was chosen for the war, it’s the reason why Anthony Fauci was pardoned back until 2014 The dates match perfectly

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Ukrainian military is reportedly selling about half of the arms received from the U.S. on international black markets, with some ending up in Latin American drug cartels. This includes dangerous conventional weapons that could threaten commercial air travel. Concerns are raised about the pathogens in biolabs in Ukraine and whether the Biden administration has a complete record of what's in those labs. There seems to be no intention to share this information with the Trump administration. The ongoing war in Ukraine is viewed as a potential source of global destabilization, raising alarms about its implications for the future.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, the thing that people don't in this country understand is that the Ukrainian military is selling about half of the arms they get from the United States into international black markets, and they're winding up, in some case, with the drug cartels in Latin America. That's a fact. Okay. It's a fact. And you can you can buy them. And I spoke to someone who did buy some actually, so I know I know this is a fact, and they're bragging about it. So they're selling conventional weapons, including weapon systems that are very dangerous and very destabilizing that would make commercial air travel impossible, for example. And so what do they get doing with the pathogens in those biolabs? And does the Biden administration have a manifest? Do they know exactly what's in those labs? And will they turn it over to the Trump administration so we can keep track of these things? And the answer is no, actually. The answer is no. I know this. Wow. So that's, like, the scariest thing that's ever happened. I think the Ukraine war has the potential to destabilize the world more than anything that's happened in my lifetime. What the hell? So that's why I'm saying this right now because I hope this is widely disseminated because I think it's, like, the scariest thing I've heard in a long, long time.

@ILA_NewsX - I Love America News

@WallStreetApes Lab leak confirmed. It came from China. https://t.co/gDpGVQzMnb https://t.co/DNHReiuQ7u

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Did you know that USAID, using YOUR tax dollars, funded bioweapon research, including COVID-19, that killed millions of people?

Saved - February 13, 2025 at 12:14 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I can't believe it! Joe is diving into some serious territory by flirting with the idea that COVID-19 was intentionally released. He asked Mike Benz about the "darkest of all conspiracy theories," and Benz hinted that the US might have funded the creation of the pathogen and the media campaign to cover it up. He left it open for us to draw our own conclusions. Joe is definitely getting into my area of interest!

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

🔥HOLY SHIT🔥 Joe is starting to flirt with the big secret! Joe asks Mike Benz how he feels about the “darkest of all conspiracy theories”, that C19 was released intentionally! After indirectly discussing USAID Project PREDICT, Benz essentially says that the US funded the creation of the pathogen, and funded the global media propaganda campaign to cover up the fact that it was man-made, and that we are welcome to draw our own conclusions based on this information. Joe is starting to creep dangerously close to my wheelhouse. 👀

Video Transcript AI Summary
The darkest theory is that the pandemic leak was intentional, a planned financial windfall and the greatest wealth transfer from the working class to the elite. We know it was created in a lab, funded by USAID, and that Fauci lied about gain of function research. The question is, was its release on purpose? It's a dark scenario, like Pearl Harbor, the Northwoods memo, the Gulf of Tonkin, or the Iraq War. Did they make it happen, or did they let it happen? Were we duped, or did we know the truth but found it useful? Many have similar thoughts about 9/11. I stay focused on what they did to create and cover it up and let others draw their own conclusions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is the darkest of conspiracy theories. The darkest of conspiracy theories was that the leak was intentional. The darkest of conspiracy theories is that this was planned. They knew this is gonna be a financial windfall. It is the greatest transfer of wealth in the history of The United States by far from the working class to the elite. It's like 3 plus, what, trillion dollars or something crazy like that? Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: We've already established that it was created in a lab. We already established that USAID funded it. We already established that Fauci et al lied about gain of function research, what they were doing. The worst theory possible is that this was released on purpose. Yeah. Speaker 1: That would be the worst case scenario. Speaker 0: Yeah. Have you ever danced that one around your head? Because that's that's where you we know they're willing to do horrible evil shit. But, like, is there a ceiling on that? Speaker 1: Even now to this day, having spent so much of my life in it, I try I try to just pursue the leads that I have and then try to let the conclusions come to me. Certainly, the fact that they funded the capacity to do this, they work directly with all the networks that were both doing it and censoring it, is puts you pretty much as, you know, they created it and they covered up at least the leak. In terms of the the intentionality for doing it, that is a really dark scenario. You know, there there are a lot of things in American history, that that have that same, you know, mihalyha distinction. You know? Do they do they make it happen or do they let it do they let it happen or do they make it happen? And both of them are major scandals that completely change the the the legitimacy and credibility of policy changes in response to the crisis, for example. Like, you know, take something like Pearl Harbor. Right? It's been declassified now, the McCullough memo, the the eight action plan. Are you are you familiar with this? The Yeah. Yeah. I'm right. You know, and this was, you know, written before the the the bombing, and it was eight ways to get Japan to attack us because, you know, we don't have diplomatic cover to declare war on them. But if if if we get them to attack us and we can then spiral that into a war predicate I mean, the the same thing, for example, with the, you know, the Northwoods memo with, you know, pretext to war with Cuba and cooking up all these, you know, hijacking our own planes, sinking our own ships, doing, you know, riots on the streets of Miami and then saying that it was, you know, the Cuban government behind it. Same thing with Vietnam, Gulf Of Tonkin, you know, same thing with, you know, with the the weapons of mass destruction, predicate for invading Iraq. Did did we know that that you know, did did we were we duped and the crime was negligence for letting our national security state believe the New York Times reporting on, you know, on chem chemical, you know, and and biological and weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, or did we make that happen? Did we did did you know, was that was that something that we knew was not true based on our own intelligence but because there was a useful thing there? And, you know, a lot of people have the same thoughts about issues around around nine eleven and any number of of crisis events. And I I suppose I have my own thoughts on it. They're not fully settled. And because they are beyond the evidence I currently have, I I I stay in the zone of this is what they did to create it, this is what they did to cover it up. Here are the stars in the sky, draw your own constellation from there. Speaker 0: That's a good way to put it. Okay.
Saved - February 18, 2025 at 4:44 PM

@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup

And save this one. Additional pertinent information relevant to FIG that mAbs felt the expert desperately needed to know. https://t.co/F1stWyIQNO

@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup

Save this one too. We’ll have the entire roster of handlers sorted out by the end of the day. https://t.co/0fTjGzNlLf

Saved - March 2, 2025 at 1:19 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
During a recent exchange, Victoria Nuland confirmed the existence of dangerous biological research facilities in Ukraine, contradicting expectations. This revelation has led to accusations of conspiracy against those questioning the situation. I noted Lindsey Graham's swift disavowal of Zelensky after a press conference, suggesting a deeper awareness of serious crimes committed by the Ukrainian government, including arms trafficking and political assassinations. The implications of these actions, particularly regarding biolabs, remain uncertain but troubling.

@ggreenwald - Glenn Greenwald

Victoria Nuland was asked by Marco Rubio if there were biolabs in Ukraine. She said Ukraine has very dangerous "biological research facilities." When some of asked: "wait, what does Ukraine have?," we were called Kremlin conspiracy theorists. This was put on my Wikipedia page: https://t.co/FR2TSV2OA0

@TuckerCarlson - Tucker Carlson

One of the most striking things about yesterday’s Zelensky press conference was Lindsey Graham’s reaction to it. The two are old friends, but Graham disavowed him within the hour. This was more than just transactional disloyalty. It was scapegoating. Lindsey Graham knows what’s coming. Over the past three years, with the tacit support of its western patrons, the Ukrainian government has committed a remarkable number of serious crimes. The Ukrainians sold huge quantities of American weapons on the international black market at twenty cents on the dollar. These weapons are now in the hands of armed groups around the world, including Hamas, the Mexican drug cartels and the forces now controlling Syria. God knows what the Ukrainians have done with the pathogens in American biolabs in their country. Even US intel agencies aren’t sure. The Ukrainians have also murdered a number of people in various countries in political assassinations, and tried to murder others, including American journalists and a European head of state. This is all true, and it’s all going to come out at some point. Better to start blaming it on Zelensky now.

@ggreenwald - Glenn Greenwald

It was one of the strangest events of my journalism career. Rubio asked Nuland this expecting her to say no. Instead, she said Ukraine's biol research labs were so dangerous the US feared them "falling into Russia's hands." Anyone who then asked about it was called crazy.🤷‍♂️ https://t.co/1H3bX4zDa5

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ukraine has biological research facilities that concern us. We are worried that Russian forces may try to control them. Therefore, we are collaborating with Ukraine on how to prevent Russian forces from gaining control of any of the research materials if they get close.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Does Ukraine have chemical or biological weapons? Ukraine has biological research facilities, which in fact we are now quite concerned Russian troops, Russian forces may be seeking to gain control of. So we are working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of Russian forces should they approach.
Saved - March 30, 2025 at 4:30 PM

@redpilldispensr - Red Pill Dispenser

Tulsi Gabbard breaks down the shocking undeniable facts about the 25-30 U.S. funded biolabs in Ukraine. https://t.co/kfbC0o5OS7

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are 25 to 30 US-funded bio labs in Ukraine researching dangerous pathogens, according to the US government. Because Ukraine is an active war zone, these labs could be compromised, releasing deadly pathogens that know no borders. If breached, these pathogens could spread throughout Europe, the United States, and the rest of the world, causing suffering and death. To protect people, these labs need to be shut down immediately, and the pathogens they hold need to be destroyed. The Biden-Harris administration needs to work with Russia, Ukraine, NATO, and the UN to implement a ceasefire for military action near these labs until they are secured and the pathogens destroyed. The US funds around 300 bio labs around the world.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here are the undeniable facts. There are 25 to 30 US funded bio labs in Ukraine. According to the US government, these bio labs are conducting research on dangerous pathogens. Ukraine is in an active war zone with widespread bombing, artillery, and shelling, and these facilities, even in the best of circumstances, could easily be compromised and release these deadly pathogens. Now like COVID, these pathogens know no borders. If they are inadvertently or purposely breached or compromised, they will quickly spread all throughout Europe, The United States, and the rest of the world causing untold suffering and death. So in order to protect the American people, the people of Europe, the people around the world, these labs need to be shut down immediately, and the pathogens that they hold need to be destroyed. Instead of trying to cover this up, the Biden Harris administration needs to work with Russia, Ukraine, NATO, the UN to immediately implement a ceasefire for all military action in the vicinity of these labs until they're secured and these pathogens are destroyed. In addition to all this, The US funds around 300 bio labs around the world who are engage
Saved - May 1, 2025 at 5:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared my thoughts on Joe Rogan's recent comments about the misinformation surrounding COVID. He criticized those who claim they were misled, pointing out that many of these individuals were the same ones spreading falsehoods. He highlighted the irony of the media's role in this narrative, suggesting that if podcasters had promoted the vaccines and people were harmed, they would have faced severe backlash. Additionally, I noted related discussions, including a guest on Rogan's show challenging the vaccine narrative and a Yale study that raises concerns about the COVID vaccine.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

NEW: Joe Rogan torches people saying we were “misled” about COVID— when the ones saying it are the exact same people who knowingly lied to the public. @JillianMichaels: “The New York Times is like, it looks like this came from a lab. It’s like, really?” @joerogan: “Well, the best part about it was that we were misled. Yeah, you were misled by you, you f*ckers. You did it. You did it!” Rogan added that if podcasters had pushed these experimental shots and people got injured, the media would’ve called for them to be banned and shut down immediately.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Five years ago, when an episode discussing COVID-19 origins came out, people reacted negatively. The speaker believed the episode was correct, and now the COVID-19 website is up, possibly due to Bobby Kennedy's influence. The New York Times reported the virus may have originated in a lab, but the speaker feels they were misled by the media itself. There have been no apologies or corrections from mainstream media, who are now presenting this information as if it's new. The speaker contrasts this with a hypothetical scenario: if podcasters had encouraged experimental shots and people experienced complications, mainstream news would have blamed the podcasters for side effects, unnecessary deaths, strokes, and other issues, potentially calling for their platforms to be shut down.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Five years? Ain't that crazy that was five years ago? It was like yesterday. I'll never forget it. Five years ago. And I remember when that episode came out, people were freaking out. Like, what are you doing? What is Brett doing? This is bullshit. You're you're gonna get us all killed. It made perfect sense to me. Well, he was right, clearly. And yet still, no apologies, no corrections, except the government website. The COVID nineteen website is now up, and this has to be because of Bobby Kennedy. I I hey. I mean, the New York Times was like, oh, looks looks like this came from a lab. It's like, you really? Well, the best part about it was that, like, we were misled. Yeah. You were misled by you, you fuckers. I know. You did it. Isn't that? You did it. It's disgusting, and there are zero apologies. No. Zero course corrections, and they unveil this information as though they are the purveyors of truth. Mhmm. Guys, we got a headline. You're a little late. From a love that you You're a half a decade late. That's right. You know what's really interesting? We've been talk talking about this a lot lately that imagine if the roles were reversed and if podcasters were the ones yelling at everybody to go out and take these experimental shots, and then they were experiencing all these complications and all these side effects. Mainstream news would be chastising us. Like, how dare you give people the advice to go out and do that? You're responsible for these people having all these side effects and all these unnecessary deaths and all these people that would have had no problem with COVID. You encourage them to take this vaccine, and they had strokes, and they had this, and they had that. They'd be calling for us to get shut down.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Related Stories: Joe Rogan Guest Completely Shatters the Vaccine Narrative https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/joe-rogan-guest-completely-shatters?utm_source=publication-search

Joe Rogan Guest Completely Shatters the Vaccine Narrative Everything you’ve been told is a lie—especially when it comes to polio. Dr. Suzanne Humphries reveals what really made all those polio cases disappear after the vaccine was introduced. vigilantfox.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Yale Study Quietly Confirms COVID Vaccine Nightmare https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/yale-study-quietly-confirms-covid

Yale Study Quietly Confirms COVID Vaccine Nightmare This is no longer a “conspiracy theory.” And the damage is only beginning. vigilantfox.com
Saved - May 1, 2025 at 4:07 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m shocked to connect the dots regarding Fauci's preemptive pardon and the reality of biolabs in Ukraine. Tulsi Gabbard mentioned collaborating with Jay Bhattacharya, the new NIH director, to investigate gain-of-function research linked to the Wuhan Lab and other US-funded biolabs worldwide. This research has contributed to significant health crises. I’ve faced accusations of being a Russian asset for highlighting these facts, which are still available on the US Embassy Ukraine's website. Speaking the truth has led to a lot of backlash.

@GuntherEagleman - Gunther Eagleman™

🚨HOLY SH*T!! We know why Fauci requested a preemptive pardon! The biolabs in Ukraine are REAL! Tulsi Gabbard: "We are working with Jay Bhattacharya, the new NIH director on this, as well as Secretary Kennedy is looking at the gain of function research that in the case of the Wuhan Lab, as well as many others." "Many of these other biolabs around the world were actually US-funded and led to this dangerous kind of research that, in many examples, has resulted in either a pandemic or some other major health crisis." "It's because this gain-of-function research is happening in biolabs around the world. That by the way is still on the US Embassy Ukraine's website today about how the US has funded these biolabs." "US -unded bio labs in Ukraine when the Russia-Ukraine war kicked off for this very reason. Who knows what kinds of pathogens are in these labs and if released could create another Covid like pandemic. And for that I was called a Russian asset. You're, you know, trumpeting Putin's talking points." "All of this nonsense simply for speaking the truth and stating facts. That by the way are still on US Embassy Ukraine's website today about how the US has funded these biolabs in Ukraine"

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is working with Jay Bhattacharya and Secretary Kennedy to investigate US-funded gain of function research, including at the Wuhan lab, and its potential link to the COVID-19 pandemic. They aim to provide evidence showing why ending this research is in the American people's best interest. The speaker claims that Anthony Fauci funded the pandemic and then denied it under oath to Senator Rand Paul. They also suggest Fauci sought a preemptive pardon from President Biden. The speaker was attacked for warning against US-funded biolabs in Ukraine, fearing potential pathogen releases. The speaker questions why the intelligence community was reluctant to conclude that COVID-19 originated in a lab, suggesting politicization of intelligence to meet objectives or influence policy. They draw a parallel to the intelligence used to justify the Iraq regime change war and its consequences. The speaker emphasizes the need to address these issues within the intelligence community and highlights the importance of leadership.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Reversed. So so it's a lot a lot of what's been found is is already there. But the thing that we are working with Jay Bhattacharya, the new NIH director on with as well as secretary Kennedy is looking at the gain of function research, that in the case of the Wuhan Lab as well as many others many of these other bio labs around the world was actually US funded and leads to this dangerous kind of research that in many examples has resulted in, either a pandemic or some other major health Speaker 1: Let me ask you specifically because we already know that EcoHealth Alliance was partnering with this Wuhan lab to create to do gain and function research. That's right. We just have never been able to have somebody say it and it was that exact experiment that led to this COVID bug. But have have we gotten there? What's the new thing that you're digging in on? Speaker 0: We we are we are working on that with Jay Bhattacharya and look forward to being able to share that, hopefully, very soon. Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 0: That that specific Link. Correct. The gain of function research and what we saw with COVID nineteen. Speaker 1: I mean, that would be extraordinary because just so the audience knows, if that's true, if it was Peter Daseck's research with the Wuhan, so called bat lady, that caused this pandemic, then we did fund it. Then Anthony Fauci helped fund the pandemic Speaker 0: things that he denied over and over and over to senator Rand Paul's questioning. That's right. Under oath. It it it an under oath. Exactly. So it is is it any wonder that he sought a preemptive pardon for anything during a certain period of time by president Biden before he left office? Speaker 1: And then strong armed and smeared people like doctor Jay Speaker 0: Bodacharya, anybody who came out and said, I don't know if that's natural. This actually smacks of lab. And and the reason why this is so important is not just what happened in the past. It's because this gain of function research is happening in bio labs around the world. I got attacked, and I think you saw this. We've probably talked about on your show before when I warned against US funded bio labs in Ukraine when the Russia Ukraine war kicked off for this very reason. Who knows what kinds of pathogens are in these labs and if released could create another COVID like pandemic? And for that, I was called a Russian asset. You're, you know, trumpeting Putin's talking points, all of this nonsense simply for speaking the truth and stating facts that, by the way, are still on US embassy Ukraine's website today about how The US has funded these bio labs in Ukraine. But in order to my point is in order to prevent another COVID like pandemic or another major health incident that could affect us in in the world, we have to we have to end this gain of function research and provide the evidence that shows exactly why and how it's in our best interest, the American people's best interest to bring about an end to it. Can I Speaker 1: just ask you one other question on that? Why did the intelligence community why were they so reluctant to just say that? You know, under Joe Biden, it was it was split. The FBI eventually said, well, we kinda think it was the lab and Department of Energy said lab. But then the other agencies were like, no. We think more natural origin long past the point when it did not look like natural origin. They tested 80 or 90,000 animals. They never found this version of virus. So what was going on with the Speaker 0: intel community You know, it's a it's a good question, and I don't have a specific answer to it. But I wanna point to the contrast of how, in some cases, they are very unwilling to come to express a view or a certain opinion on something. And in other cases, even if they don't have decisive or conclusive evidence per se, they're very quickly to come to an assumption. And this this gets to the real heart of the challenge here and the problems that we've seen is the politicization of intelligence to meet a certain objective or to influence a certain policy. And that that is what has been the problem. This goes all the way back to why this organization was founded when you look at the so called intelligence that really was used to spur the Iraq regime change war. And look at what that has cost our country Mhmm. In lives and treasure. Look at what it's cost the world. Look at what what Iraq is today, now essentially a a proxy of Iran. When Iraq that that would not have happened had that regime change war, not occurred. Speaker 1: That's Speaker 0: right. So so, again, this is this is really what is at the heart of needs of what needs to be addressed within the intelligence community and why leadership matters so much. Just as a reminder to our audience, you were a young 21 Speaker 1: year Speaker 0: old
Saved - May 3, 2025 at 4:26 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
One day, I plan to share my full story about being a victim of Big Tech censorship and a smear campaign by mainstream media for reporting on US-funded labs in Ukraine in 2022. Now, Tulsi and RFK Jr. are investigating the biolab network that the media claimed didn’t exist. I believe my name will eventually be cleared after they tried to ruin my life over legitimate information to cover up their wrongdoing. I will have my vengeance. The video features MSNBC’s Alex Wagner discussing the biolabs and referencing my viral tweet, which they dismissed as Russian disinformation.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

One day, I’m going to need to tell my full story. I was the victim of a Big Tech censorship and MSM smear campaign, for reporting on the US-funded labs in Ukraine, in 2022. Now Tulsi/RFK Jr. are investigating the US biolab network in Ukraine, that the MSM claimed didn’t exist… I don’t know how or when, but one day, they are going to put some respect on my good name that they have dragged through the mud. They tried to ruin my life, over information that was 100% legitimate, all in an attempt to cover up their criminality. I will have my vengeance. Video is of MSNBC’s Alex Wagner breaking down the biolabs in Ukraine story in 2022. They featured my viral tweet in the video, and proceeded to claim it was Russian disinformation.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In mid-February, a post appeared on Gab claiming the existence of US bio labs in Ukraine financed by the US Department of Defense. Ten days before the invasion, the post gained traction on far-right websites. On the day of the invasion, Russia's Ministry of Foreign Affairs tweeted about discovering evidence of Ukraine concealing a US Defense Department-financed military biological program. Tucker Carlson then discussed the conspiracy theory, which appears to have originated as Russian disinformation. This pattern of disinformation involves identifying an issue, amplifying it through social media, and then moving it into the mainstream media before it impacts the real world. This is the same playbook that resulted in January 6.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So in mid February, this this random post appears on Gab, which is like a far right Right. Sort of website. Right? And this post comes up ten days before the invasion, and it says, exclusive US bio labs in Ukraine, and they are financed at the expense of the US Department of Defense. Right? Like, kind of weirdly worded, maybe not from a native English speaker. Right. Then on the day of the invasion, suddenly it gets picked up. It's skyrocketing around far right websites, social networks. Russia's Ministry Of Foreign Affairs tweets that Russia has found evidence that Ukraine is covering up a military biological program financed by the US Defense Department. And eventually, Tucker Carlson, the most watched cable news host in America, is talking about a conspiracy theory that, by all accounts, seems to have originated as a piece of Russian disinformation. Speaker 1: What exactly are they doing in these secret Ukrainian biolabs? Speaker 0: Does this kind of origin story sound familiar to you? Speaker 1: The pathology of it, yes, is consistent with prior disinformation campaigns that we've seen from Russia. So you have your social media accounts. You identify the issue that you want. Then you start amplifying. And then it jumps over into the mainstream. It jumps over from Facebook into the media space. And from there it gets to that final step of hitting the real world. And by the way that's the exact same playbook that resulted in January 6.
Saved - July 15, 2023 at 9:08 PM

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

1) HOLY SHIT… BIOWEAPONS ALERT RFK Jr. claims that the Biolabs in Ukraine are “collecting Russian DNA” to make “ethnically targeted bioweapons”. These are the EXACT allegations Russia made to the UN, and is the main reason for Russia’s invasion! MUST READ THREAD! (This original thread was deleted, but not by me so I am reposting it)

View Full Interactive Feed