reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - November 17, 2023 at 6:08 PM

@chrissaccoccia1 - Chris Sky🧱

Where does rampant pedophilia in our "ruling class" of zionists come from? The TALMUD. ketubot 11b 6 This is why Epsteins client list is a secret! Retweet! http://www.joinchrisnow.com to protect kids from this disgusting agenda.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker makes a controversial claim about the connection between pedophilia and the Talmud. They mention a specific passage and argue that it justifies sexual acts with minors. They also allege that elected officials who are Zionist engage in child abuse.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's going on everybody? What if I told you the pension for pedophilia among our ruling class comes directly from the Talmud. Ketubuk 11 B6, a man who has sex with a minor of less than 3 years old has done nothing wrong because sex with a 3 year old is the equivalent of poking someone in the eye. And furthermore, a 3 year old's ruptured hymen can be restored. This is why All your elected officials who are Zionist love to fuck, rape, traffic, and torture little children.
SavingaChild - Home joinchrisnow.savingachild.com
Saved - December 11, 2023 at 12:17 AM

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

Hananya Naftali must be suspended, Elon. Clear call for genocide. https://t.co/2YqcLnC3sK

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

As I said earlier this week, “decolonization”, “from the river to the sea” and similar euphemisms necessarily imply genocide. Clear calls for extreme violence are against our terms of service and will result in suspension.

Saved - January 11, 2024 at 1:15 AM

@realstewpeters - Stew Peters

“A Jew may have sex with a child as long as the child is less than nine years.”✡️ ~Talmud: Sanhedrin 54b https://t.co/UYKJLuCk61

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the video, the speaker raises a question about a passage in the Jewish Talmud, specifically Sanhedrin 54b. The passage suggests that a Jewish person may engage in sexual activity with a child under the age of 9. The speaker seeks clarification on whether this passage truly exists in the Talmud.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's obviously a lot of questions. One of the things that keeps coming up is in the Jewish Talmud, Sanhedrin 54 b, quote, a Jew may have sex with a child as long as the child is less than 9 years old. Is that is that really written? That's in the Talmud.
Saved - January 23, 2024 at 4:08 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk's recent activities, including visiting Israel and Auschwitz, expressing his connection to Judaism, and wearing a kippah and a dog tag, have sparked discussions about prioritizing certain groups on X. The CEO of X has now addressed antisemitism in combating hate on the platform. Some users claim that pro-Palestinian accounts are being restricted and banned, while complaints about Zionist accounts calling for genocide are being ignored. The focus seems to be solely on combating antisemitism, regardless of other forms of discrimination.

@CensoredMen - Censored Men

Elon Musk has: - Went to Israel. - Went to Auschwitz. - Said he's aspirationally Jewish. - Said he's Jew-ish. - Thanked the ADL for supporting advertisement on X, after they previously prevented it. - Wore a kippah. - Wore a dog tag since leaving Israel. And now X's CEO specifically outlines antisemitism when it comes to combatting hate on X. There's clearly a group of people that take priority at X. Pro-Palestinian accounts have been getting their reach throttled. Pro-Palestinian accounts have been getting banned, while MULTIPLE complaints about Zionist accounts calling for genocide have been ignored. It doesn't matter if you call for the genocide of the Palestinians. It doesn't matter if you're Anti-White. It doesn't matter if you're Anti-Black. It doesn't matter if you've Anti-Brown. It doesn't matter if you're Anti-Christian. It doesn't matter if you're Anti-Muslim. All that matters is antisemitism. Just give them their advertisers back man, it's getting embarrassing at this point.

Saved - January 25, 2024 at 12:27 AM

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

ISRAELI CHILDREN CHANTING VIOLENCE AGAINST PALESTINIANS “May your village burn down” Who is indoctrinated with hate from a young age @elonmusk? https://t.co/NnmA6Qxutv

Saved - March 21, 2024 at 3:14 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Talmud, a text written between the 8th and 9th centuries, initially permitted pederasty. It was later banned in the 12th century by Maimonides due to the influence of Islamic culture. The relevant passage, Sanhedrin 54b, explains that a Jewish man who engages in sexual acts with a boy under nine years old is not punished by the law. This demonstrates the adoption of permissive attitudes towards pederasty in late antiquity. Maimonides, in Mishneh Torah, overrides this passage and condemns the act, influenced by Islamic society. He states that both parties should be stoned if they are adults, and if a minor is involved, the adult should be stoned and the minor is not liable.

@Haqiqatjou - Daniel Haqiqatjou

Pederasty (r-pe of little boys) is permitted in the Talmud. (The Talmud was a constantly evolving orally transmitted text that was only written down between the 8th and 9th centuries). Pederasty was only banned later on in the 12th century by Maimonides due the influence of the surrounding Islamic culture where he lived. Lets look at the evidence. The relevant passage is Sanhedrin 54b. The passage explains that a Jewish man who sodomizes a boy below nine years of age is not liable to be punished by the law. (Engaging in sexual intercourse "passively" means being sodomized). The passage demonstrates how Jews in late antiquity began to adopt the same permissive attitudes towards pederasty found in contemporary Greco-Roman culture. Please click on the link below and verify the passage yourself. I also challenge readers who disagree with this post to place a community note on the post which establishes that it contains incorrect information. Also the non-Jewish reader should be aware that religious Jews are trained to deny and lie about their religious teachings (i.e., the Talmud - in Sanhedrin 59a - teaches that Jews must prevent non-Jews from learning about their religion/Torah. The non-Jew who tries to study their religion is to be executed by stoning). The relevant passage (Sanhedrin 54b) permitting the r-pe of boys under age 9 reads: "The Sages taught: With regard to intercourse with a male, the Torah does not deem a younger boy to be like an older boy; but with regard to intercourse with an animal, the Torah does deem a young animal to be like an old animal. "The Gemara asks: What does it mean that the Torah does not deem a younger boy to be like an older boy? Rav says: It means that the Torah does not deem the intercourse of one who is less than nine years old to be like the intercourse of one who is at least nine years old, as for a male’s act of intercourse to have the legal status of full-fledged intercourse the minimum age is nine years. And Shmuel says: The Torah does not deem the intercourse of a child who is less than three years old to be like that of one who is three years old. The Gemara asks: With regard to what principle do Rav and Shmuel disagree? The Gemara answers: Rav holds that any halakha that applies to one who engages in intercourse actively applies to one who engages in intercourse passively, and any halakha that does not apply to one who engages in intercourse actively does not apply to one who engages in intercourse passively. Therefore, just as one who engages in intercourse actively is not liable if he is less than nine years old, as the intercourse of such a child does not have the halakhic status of intercourse, so too, if a child who is less than nine years old engages in homosexual intercourse passively, the one who engages in intercourse with him is not liable." https://www.sefaria.org/Sanhedrin.54b.19-21?lang=bi Later on in Mishneh Torah, Maimonides overrides this scandalous passage due to the influence of the Islamic society in which he lived - deciding that Jews should follow Islamic norms and not r-pe young boys. Maimonides claims that the person who r-pes a young boy deserves an additional lashing punishment. The notion of lashing someone as an additional judicial punishment (tazir) comes directly out of Islamic law. Maimonides says: When a man enters into relations with a male or has a male enter into relations with him, once the corona is inserted [into the anus] they should both be stoned if they are both adults. As [Leviticus 18:22] states: "Do not lie with a man," [holding one liable for the act, whether] he is the active or passive partner. If a minor of nine years and a day or more is involved, the man who enters into relations or has the minor enter into relations with him should be stoned and the minor is not liable. If the male [minor] was less than nine years old, they are both free of liability. It is, however, appropriate for the court to subject the adult to stripes for rebellious conduct for homosexual relations although his companion was less than nine years old. https://www.sefaria.org/Mishneh_Torah%2C_Forbidden_Intercourse.1.14?lang=bi&with=all&lang2=en

Sanhedrin 54b:19-21 § The Sages taught: With regard to intercourse with a male, the Torah does not deem a younger boy to be like an older boy; but with regard to intercourse with... sefaria.org
Page Not Found | Sefaria sefaria.org
Saved - March 25, 2024 at 5:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A video of Islamic jihadist @mohammed_hijab openly discussing pedophilia has sparked concern. Users are calling for his account to be reported for violating X terms of service. Some are reaching out to @elonmusk for assistance in protecting children.

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

Pedophilia is a violation of X terms of service. This is a video of Islamic jihadist @mohammed_hijab openly saying “pedophilia is relative”. Please report his account for support of pedophilia. Here he is on video saying “pedophilia is relative” as he tries to justify sex with children. @elonmusk please protect the children from this monster. He has no place on X.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In Islam, marrying a 100-year-old woman may cause harm, but marrying a developed 13-year-old may not. The speaker believes it's about avoiding harm in relationships. They mention the legality of marrying older vs. younger individuals in different countries, emphasizing the relative nature of pedophilia.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No. We don't think there's any problem with it at all. We think that, it's just because we have a different idea of what it means to be a child, which can be tracked historically. But now if the situation has changed, we'd say that the general principle in Islam is, you know, you can do what you kinda want so long as I'm not gonna say you can do what you want so long as you're harming. You can do you can marry whomever you want to marry so long as it doesn't cause them harm, physical and psychological. So So for example, if I marry a 100 year old woman or a sneaker, if you marry with your tank top, a 100 year old woman, and, you know, and you and you get involved with her intimately, she might die. I mean, she or she might have some kind of, health problem. So we would say that, well, if you if you were to be intimate with a 14 year old or, you know, 13 year old who's got huge hips and huge breasts and huge body, I mean, quite frankly, we would say, it's not it's not gonna have the same effect medically. I mean, no one can make the argument. But on in these countries where we live in now, one is legal and one is both are one is illegal. So for in other words, you can't marry a 100 year old woman, but you can marry that that girl that's you know, you can't be. This is your pedophile if you if you go for the girl that's got the hips. And once again, pedophilia is very relative.

@mohammed_hijab - Mohammed Hijab

@LauraLoomer @TRobinsonNewEra @sneako Keep talking @LauraLoomer , we have information about you which (if released) will ruin your life. Perhaps you would like to cleanse your sins by providing charity to Gaza and other affected areas on the link below. https://campaigns.givebrite.com/fundraiser/emergencyrelieffund-mohammedhijab-223

Emergency Relief Fund | One Ummah Help Mohammed raise £10,000 for Emergency Relief Fund campaigns.givebrite.com
Saved - July 8, 2024 at 6:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Lucas faced severe harassment, including death and rape threats, doxxing, and unwanted deliveries. Despite this, he received a 6-month suspension while others who violated X's terms of service were reinstated. Lucas' tweets criticizing Jewish supremacy and burning the Talmud were not inciting violence, as similar actions against other religions are common on X without consequences. This double standard and violation of promised free speech need to be addressed and Lucas' suspension should be reversed.

@CensoredMen - Censored Men

This needs to be fixed, @elonmusk. Let me get this straight. Lucas gets swatted multiple times. Lucas gets multiple death threats. Lucas' family get multiple death threats. Lucas gets multiple rape threats against his wife. Lucas gets multiple deliveries to his home that he didn't order. Lucas and his entire family get doxxed. And in response, HE receives a 6 month suspension. @visegrad24 literally posted a video of a minor being sodomized and got their account reinstated next day. This is completely unacceptable. Lucas was being harassed nonstop and X punishes HIM for it. Stop Antisemites, Canary Mission, Shirion Collective & Jewsaredagoat have broke X's TOS multiple times by doxxing people. Where is their suspension? @NickJFuentes said the word 'Jews' the other day and had his tweet visibility limited. Would any other group receive the same treatment? The answer is no. This decision needs to be reversed; this double standard is completely unacceptable.

@CensoredMen - Censored Men

Apparently these two tweets got him suspended, both aren't violating X's TOS.

@CensoredMen - Censored Men

Ok so these are the two tweets people are saying most likely resulted in Lucas' suspension, so let's go through them. @elonmusk 1. The Flag Cutting Video - Cutting a country's flag is not inciting violence. Palestinian flags, American flags, Iranian flags etc, are burned and destroyed on X everyday. - Saying 'Death to Jewish Supremacy' isn't inciting violence. It is saying death to an ideology based on racial supremacism. Why would anyone be suspended for saying death to racial supremacism? It is said for other races daily on X, and nobody else is getting suspended for it. 2. The Talmud Burning - If burning holy books were a violation of X's TOS, then @Salwan_Momika1 would be banned 10 times over. - Everyone has seen either the Bible or Quran being burned on X. Those accounts haven't been suspended. So why does burning the Talmud cross the line? — Multiple people have ACTUALLY incited violence on X. Multiple people have called for the complete destruction of Gaza and the genocide of Palestinians. I've seen no suspension of their accounts. So, is the idea of 'Jewish Supremacy' deemed more important than the actual LIVES of Palestinians? One can call for the death of every Palestinian, but one cannot call for the death of 'Jewish Supremacy'? This makes no logical sense. It points to a double standard. The Quran and Bible can be burned by multiple big accounts on X, but the Talmud cannot? It points to a double standard. Lucas' whole suspension reeks of hypocrisy and needs to be reversed asap. We were promised free speech, and as of right now, that promise is being violated.

Saved - July 17, 2024 at 2:06 AM

@propandco - Prop. co

“If a Jew rapes a 3 year old baby, the baby should be executed.” The soldiers who subscribe to this interpretation are currently raping Palestinians in concentration camps. https://t.co/xe849pNhR9

Saved - July 30, 2024 at 5:02 PM

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

"In the JEWISH state, by JEWISH law, only a Jewish woman can be r@p€d. Assault of a non-jew is a lesser crime" Comment (S) to spit on the jewish state. Comment (S) to spit on jewish law. https://t.co/ZJx2VEm4uB

Saved - August 19, 2024 at 10:42 PM

@MayyitAl60210 - Voice of Freedom 🇵🇸 🇿🇦

The Rabbi explains: The hymen grows back, so sex with a girl before the age of 3 is not considered a sin nor a crime, because she 'doesn't lose her virginity'. More vile you cannot find https://t.co/6JMBV85vpN

Saved - August 19, 2024 at 6:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I had to delete a video of a rabbi making disturbing comments about children, which had over 4 million views. There was no child in the video, just the rabbi. I'm questioning why @elonmusk is protecting this content.

@DrLoupis - Dr. Anastasia Maria Loupis

Elon Muslk (@elonmusk) just forced me to delete the video of a Jewish rabbi saying that it is okay to rape a toddler, that the hymen will grow back. It didn’t show any child! The video had more than 4 million views! Why are you protecting these pedophiles? @elonmusk because they are Jewish?

@DrLoupis - Dr. Anastasia Maria Loupis

No child showing. Just this old pedophile. Seriously @elonmusk? https://t.co/VHfa3gLPdl

Saved - August 19, 2024 at 10:43 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I had to delete my video after it hit 4 million views, despite it not showing anything inappropriate. It referenced a disturbing claim by a rabbi about children. I can't help but feel that if it involved a Muslim, it would have been amplified instead of removed.

@DrLoupis - Dr. Anastasia Maria Loupis

Elon Musk (@elonmusk) forced me to delete this video after 4 million views… No child showing. Just an old pedophile..

@MayyitAl60210 - Voice of Freedom 🇵🇸 🇿🇦

The Rabbi explains: The hymen grows back, so sex with a girl before the age of 3 is not considered a sin nor a crime, because she 'doesn't lose her virginity'. More vile you cannot find https://t.co/6JMBV85vpN

@DrLoupis - Dr. Anastasia Maria Loupis

I can assure you, if this had been a Muslim, @elonmusk would have amplified it himself. When it’s a Jewish rabbi, he deleted it.

Saved - August 31, 2024 at 8:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a series of posts discussing controversial interpretations of the Talmud regarding the acquisition of non-Jewish children as slaves. The posts explore how certain passages suggest that sodomy could be a means of acquiring a slave, while also highlighting objections from other Rabbis. I referenced academic work on related legal discussions and pointed out the troubling implications for contemporary issues involving child trafficking. I emphasized the complexity of the Talmud and cautioned against generalizing these views to all Jews, noting the ongoing debate within Judaism.

@Haqiqatjou - Daniel Haqiqatjou

🧵 How to Acquire Child Slaves by Sodomizing Them According to the Talmud This photo of a Jewish soldier menacing a Palestinian child has gone viral. But what's the story here? https://t.co/a8h2jpqiFb

@Haqiqatjou - Daniel Haqiqatjou

The Talmud says it is permissible for Jews to kidnap non-Jewish children and make them slaves. The Talmud views non-Jewish children as akin to animals. So just as a Jew may acquire an animal roaming about, he may do the same to acquire a non-Jewish child as a slave. (Kiddushin 22b)

@Haqiqatjou - Daniel Haqiqatjou

So how does sodomy come into play? First, we have to understand the full context. In this passage, the Rabbis explain how to acquire slaves through possession. The point here is, if a slave does some kind of work for you, you acquire him or her as a slave. https://t.co/0PnezFuG8L

@Haqiqatjou - Daniel Haqiqatjou

The Rabbis then extend this "logic." If a slave is acquired whenever he or she does work for the master, then sexual intercourse can be considered work too. Therefore, a slave can be acquired by sexual intercourse. However... https://t.co/dxXvrZog5u

@Haqiqatjou - Daniel Haqiqatjou

The Gemara objects! In the case of sexual intercourse, both the Jew master and the non-Jewish slave enjoy it. This cannot be considered work for the slave. Therefore, sex cannot be a valid form of acquiring the slave. Now is when the real "genius" of the Talmud comes in... https://t.co/ldpI7jXxFV

@Haqiqatjou - Daniel Haqiqatjou

If the non-Jew is sodomized, then that becomes acceptable as a way to acquire the slave. Why? Because, according to some Rabbis, sodomizing the non-Jew benefits the Jew but does not benefit the non-Jew. Therefore, the slave can be acquired through sodomy according to this opinion in the Talmud.

@Haqiqatjou - Daniel Haqiqatjou

In another passage from the Jerusalem Talmud, it is indicated that Jews who come across a child with no parents (i.e., a foundling) have the option of taking him as a slave. This is discussed in an academic article by Yifat Monnickendam: "The Exposed Child: Transplanting Roman Law into Late Antique Jewish and Christian Legal Discourse" American Journal of Legal History, Volume 59, Issue 1, March 2019, Pages 1–30.

@Haqiqatjou - Daniel Haqiqatjou

It is no coincidence that Israelis are notorious for enslaving and sex trafficking children from across the world. The Talmud gives them religious license for this. The many orphaned children of Palestine have to deal with people who believe in such horrific teachings.

@Haqiqatjou - Daniel Haqiqatjou

Remember: The Talmud is a complex work that requires careful reading. Go to the cited passages on Sefaria and read for yourself. Warning to Anti-Semites: Do not use this information to spread anti-Jew hate! Clearly not all Rabbis believe that child slaves can be acquired through sodomy. This is a matter of contentious debate in Judaism, so do NOT paint all Jews with the same brush.

Saved - November 24, 2024 at 1:45 AM

@realstewpeters - Stew Peters

Hey @elonmusk This guy just put a public bounty on my head. Does that break @X TOS or no because he’s jewish? https://t.co/bYJ2gzuCD8

Saved - December 22, 2024 at 9:16 PM

@realstewpeters - Stew Peters

No. @elonmusk is not running a free speech platform. @LogosRevealedI was locked out of his account for “violating X rules” 9/11 was a Jewish, Israeli Mossad op, and everyone knows it. https://t.co/c6CB5zcEgq

Saved - January 7, 2025 at 12:15 PM

@Deja_Vu_4Me - ~☆~LindaEvans🇺🇸 🌎

@elonmusk Seems leftwing democrats in the west have joined with the Islamic belief that having sex with children is perfectly fine since Mohammed did it. Never forget the 158 Dems vote against a bill to deport illegal immigrants who commit sex crimes. Democrats have sold their soul. https://t.co/v3D5GBK1Ea

Saved - January 9, 2025 at 11:58 AM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧

ADMIN POST Ayatollah Khomeini allows obtaining sexual pleasure from children. Can we have a conversation about Islam condoning, even promoting, child sexual exploitation yet? Or does the overton window need shifting a little bit more? If so, happy to help with that. https://t.co/5ml3weJdqc

Video Transcript AI Summary
Good evening, everyone. After exposing disturbing content in Imam Khomeini's writings, some have denied these claims. I present evidence from his book on Sharia Law, published in Iran. It states that sexual penetration of a wife is not permissible until she is nine years old. However, it permits other forms of sexual pleasure with underage girls, including newborns. There are no legal consequences for rapists if the victim is under nine; they only face a minor sin. If a girl is harmed to the point of severe injury, the rapist must provide financial compensation. This text dehumanizes young girls, allowing for their exploitation. Imam Khomeini's teachings are deeply troubling.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good evening, my dear friends and respected followers, respected guests, everyone that's on my page. Peace be upon you all. Alright. Now after we exposed the child raping, in the books of Imam Khomeini, a group of people came out saying, no. This is not true. Is lying. This isn't these are not the books of Khomeini, trying to stick up for a absolute advocate for child, raping. So how about I just show you the book? This here is, and it's volume number 2. And, published in the Islamic Republic of Iran. We'll take a look at the the license of the book published by the institute that publishes and spreads the teachings of Imam Khomeini. This is their email if you'd like to go and say thank you to them. These advocates for child rape. This is the book that I was forced to study in the Islamic Institute of of Iran. This is the book of Sharia Law. Come over here. The chapter of marriage, the ethics of conducting a marriage contract, marriage procedure, page number 255. Sharia law number 12. Clearly, he rules. This is his verdict. It is not permissible to sexually penetrate the wife before she finishes 9 years old, whether it be permanent or temporary marriage, as for other methods and means of sexual pleasure and entertainment, like touching out of sexual lust, and hugging out of sexual lust. What which basically means folding the the thighs of the underage girl and penetrating her thighs. All of these, touching her, touching the baby girl with a sexual desire, sexual lust, hugging her with a sexual lust, and fying her. There is no problem in that. There is no problem in that even even even with the baby girl, newborn. Means the baby that is suckling, that is being breastfed, that was born yesterday. Even with the young one day year old, 1 hour year old, 2 hour year old baby. What can you do with the baby? He tells you, you can fight it, you can hug it in a lustful way, and you can touch it in its private areas, and he names it as as sexual pleasures with this newborn baby. Then he says, And even if this little baby You see this comma? It's not a full stop, it's a continuation of this. This baby, if she is penetrated, deflowered before the age of 9, There is nothing that could happen to the man as a punishment, nothing happens to the rapist as a punishment. Other than that that rapist has sinned between himself and God, which means there's no punishment, there's no imprisonment, nothing. He just sent a minor sin. Then he says, and if he does rape her, penetrate her, insert, his male organ inside her to the point, then to the point that he rips the passage between the vagina and the, and the external, side of the body. Oh to the point that there are no longer 2 holes, everything becomes one big hole because he has ripped the little baby in half, then he says, Then only can you refrain from raping the little baby. Then he says over here, and if she remains alive, this little baby this little baby, if she remains alive, then you have to give her money. Even if he divorces her, this little baby girl. Now, And after this rapist has finished raping the little baby girl, and he pays her the money, and she goes to marry off another person, another rapist, who's a baby girl marries off another rapist, and then after she rapes this she is raped once again by the new rapist. It says, He needs to give her, this little girl, more money, the dowry for taking her virginity. Other than that, she is an object that can be molested, and raped, and touched, and fight, even if she's younger than 9. Why? Because there's no problem in that. Imam Khomeini, a sick human being. Goodbye.
Saved - March 8, 2025 at 7:55 PM

@GeneralpattonS - GeneralPatton’sGhost

@petersavodnik They should be physically and emotionally homeless too. Monsters 110 is now https://archive.org/details/TheCompleteListOfThe1030JewishExpulsionsInHumanHistory

Internet Archive: Error archive.org
Saved - April 3, 2025 at 1:36 PM

@Use_Yandex - Use Yandex Search Engine for Anti Zionist searches

Demand answers from @realDonaldTrump why he supports Chabad Rabbis & Noahide laws pumped out by Chabad when they support child rape. https://t.co/Hc8xUXZT3o

Video Transcript AI Summary
If a man has relations with a girl under three and she bleeds, it's not considered dam ne'eda because before three, it's not halachically cohabitation. If the hymen ruptures before three, it regrows. After three, it doesn't grow back. If a man has relations with a girl after she's fully three, her psulim will never grow back. If it's under three, it will either not rupture or it will grow back. Relations with a girl under three is compared to poking a finger in the eye, causing tearing and bleeding that will then heal. Dam of biya with a girl under three will make her bleed, but it's dam Sulim, which will regrow.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Before she was three and she saw blood. Then he had another relation with her after she was three, and again, Umaq Saddam. Now, if we say that the hymen gets ruptured and it regrows if it got ruptured before she was three, And it grows back right away. So we understand what happened. He saw Dam when had a relation with her under three. Sulim. She sees Dam again after three. What is it from? Sulim. Under three, there's no Haiman or it's not ruptured. It only happens So really what we're focusing in is not the fact that he had a relation with her after she was three. If a man has a relation with a girl under three and she sees dam, that's the Nafkamina. If it doesn't rupture before she's three years old and she had dam after the relation, is that this is dam neither. Because before three, it's not halachically an act of cohabitation. But nevertheless, four three is a dam Sulim or is a dam neither? Nothing. And neither to her. And if it's damned, she's the needy and he's She will be damselum both times. Correct. Correct. Today, we have a doctor here. What's the? The fact that it grows back, it means that something changes, some there's some change after three, it means it grows back before three, it doesn't go back after three. Everything grows very fast. But but but after three, Baha'u'll doesn't grow back. There, though. She wants get doctor Dani, afterward, the is saying that a man has a relation with a girl, god forbid, after three God forbid. After three once she's three full three years old, then her psulim will never grow back. She will lose her psulim. If a man has a relation with a girl under three, it's gonna either it never ruptured or it was gonna grow back. Now she's three years old, someone had a relation with her. That's it. It's ruptured. If a man has a relation with a girl under three, It's as if someone takes a finger and pokes it in the eye. It's like when you put a finger in the eye. As long as the finger is in the eye, the eye tears and it tears and it tears again. That's the shot that tearing meaning here, they'll be bleeding. And if a man has a relation to act with a girl under three, she's gonna bleed, but then it's gonna grow back. And if he has a relation with her again when she's over three, she's gonna bleed again. Gets ruptured, dam of biya with a girl under three will make her bleed. It's not damned, it's damned Sulim. And then since she was not three years old, Va'asu, Dam Sulim will come back. Dam Sulim will regrow because Azashi ate no tomato. Before she was three and she

@LandonTychicus - TYCHICUS LANDON

@Use_Yandex The Death Penalty for rape and murder. https://t.co/qQw1zABrZJ

Saved - June 20, 2025 at 6:52 AM

@King_GoyV - ⁜ King Goy V ⁜

@FakeBatmanClub 20 of the talmuds pedophile quotes https://t.co/jEsQihX26X

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Talmud allegedly contains the following statements: Sanhedrin 52 b: A Jew's act with a Gentile youth is not judged as a capital offense. Yabama 34 a: A Gentile child's violation is not counted as sin. Sanhedrin 54 b, a Jew may have intercourse with a child under nine years old. Yabamoth 55B, a Jew may have relations with a Gentile child. Yabamoth 12B, a Gentile girl's impurity begins at birth. Yabamath 11b, a girl under three years old, if violated, remains a virgin. Avoid Azarah 39a, Gentile children are impure from infancy. Yabamath 98b, relations with Gentile offspring are outside covenantal restrictions. Naderim 27 a, a Jew's relations with a Gentile boy are exempt from binding oaths. Yabamath 70 a, Gentile infants are permissible for Jewish relations. Avoid Azara 45 a, Gentile progenies are deemed unfit for sacred unions but allowable otherwise. Yabamath 82A: A Gentile girl under five is permissible for Jewish relations. Yabamath 86A: Gentile children under three are not sinful if violated. Avoid Azarah 47B: A Jew's act with a Gentile child is not bound by priestly prohibitions. Yabamath 95b, Gentile children under two are usable for Jewish relations. Kethubath 24a, a Gentile girl under six is permissible for violation. Kethubath 15a, a Jew's conduct with a Gentile minor does not breach marital vows. Kethubah 34a, a Gentile girl under seven's violation is not counted. Sanhedrin 54a, a Jew's act with a Gentile boy under nine is not deemed a capital sin. Naderim 22a, a vow against relations does not apply to Gentile children.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The following are 20 of the most egregious pedophilic quotes from the Talmud. Sanhedrin 52 b: A Jew's act with a Gentile youth is not judged as a capital offense. Yabama 34 a: A Gentile child's violation is not counted as sin. Sanhedrin 54 b, a Jew may have intercourse with a child under nine years old. Yabamoth 55B, a Jew may have relations with a Gentile child. Yabamoth 12B, a Gentile girl's impurity begins at birth. Yabamath 11b, a girl under three years old, if violated, remains a virgin. Avoid Azarah 39a, Gentile children are impure from infancy. Yabamath 98b, relations with Gentile offspring are outside covenantal restrictions. Naderim 27 a, a Jew's relations with a Gentile boy are exempt from binding oaths. Yabamath 70 a, Gentile infants are permissible for Jewish relations. Avoid Azara 45 a, Gentile progenies are deemed unfit for sacred unions but allowable otherwise. Yabamath 82A: A Gentile girl under five is permissible for Jewish relations. Yabamath 86A: Gentile children under three are not sinful if violated. Avoid Azarah 47B: A Jew's act with a Gentile child is not bound by priestly prohibitions. Yabamath 95b, Gentile children under two are usable for Jewish relations. Kethubath 24a, a Gentile girl under six is permissible for violation. Kethubath 15a, a Jew's conduct with a Gentile minor does not breach marital vows. Kethubah 34a, a Gentile girl under seven's violation is not counted. Sanhedrin 54a, a Jew's act with a Gentile boy under nine is not deemed a capital sin. Naderim 22a, a vow against relations does not apply to Gentile children.
Saved - September 3, 2025 at 5:22 AM

@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore

Raping your children is morally permissible for jews. 🎯 It tells them so in their satanic talmud which was written by the PHARISEES. https://t.co/CNMt9s8uU6

Saved - September 20, 2025 at 7:42 PM

@kalurgi - Iamnoone

@LetsGoBrando45 Why are people blind to the reality that it is Jews who want pedophilia to become legal and acceptable? They are the ones who have driven the whole sexual perversion movement. It is all threre in their scriptures. If you tolerate Jews, you serve Satan. https://t.co/Q4R0nhOj3X

Video Transcript AI Summary
According to the speaker, in 1932 the Jews who made up only 1% of the world's population accounted for 34% of the world's dope peddlers and 47% of robberies. They accounted for 47% of cricket games of chance, 82% of international crime organizations, and 98% of dealers in prostitution. The speaker emphasizes that these figures span multiple criminal domains and identifies a linguistic thread by noting that the most common expressions in the jargon of international gangsters and criminals stem from Hebrew and Yiddish words. These percentages pertain to dope peddlers, robberies, cricket games of chance, international crime organizations, and dealers in prostitution.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 1932, the Jews who made up only 1% of the world's population accounted for 34% of the world's dope peddlers and 47% of robberies. 47% of cricket games of chance. 82% of international crime organizations. And 98% of dealers in prostitution. The most common expressions in the jargon of international gangsters and criminals stem from Hebrew and Yiddish words.
Saved - October 18, 2025 at 6:48 PM

@AlaricReturned - Alaric

My account was suspended for saying that RobinStein is a Talmudic tool. https://t.co/wMLc3ZvKDz

Saved - October 24, 2025 at 1:33 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I claim the Talmud is far worse than you think. Nick Fuentes has entered the antisemitic zone. @yusxiv. @Mish_K_: Here, Mish from India acting Israeli. @uroz_susan59845. @newchristt: wait until you read what you did to Iraqi people under the false pretext of WMD. You should be the last to speak.

@JeffreyxEpstein - Jeff Epstein

The Talmud is actually much worse than you think. https://t.co/tMD7t8EEdP

Video Transcript AI Summary
- The text discusses alleged corruption of Judaism by occult and immoral practices of Babylon, focusing on pederasty or the sexual molestation of children. It asserts that today’s greatest rabbis of the Talmud would be locked up as child molesters. - It claims pederasty was deeply entrenched among respected Talmudic rabbis and that local rabbis could acquire a baby girl at three years of age as a sex toy by rape. - It cites passages from the Talmud as permission: - Nida 45 b: “a woman asks, master, at what age may a woman marry? At the age of three years and one day, he told her. A girl of three years old and a day may be betrothed by intercourse.” - “Rabbi Joseph said, come in here, a maiden of three years old and a day may be acquired in marriage by …” - “When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl, it is nothing.” - The footnote to this passage says, “tears come to the eye again and again. So does virginity come back to the little girl under three years.” - The Talmud forbids homosexuality among adult Jews, but sodomy with small boys is said to be permitted. It states Leviticus 20:13 forbids sexual relations between men, yet the Talmud defines a boy under nine as a minor, not a man. - Because the boy is not sexually mature, the Talmud teaches he cannot throw guilt upon the rabbi who rapes him; only one who is able to engage in sexual intercourse may throw guilt upon the active offender, while one who is unable cannot. - It notes that the pederasty mentioned is endorsed by the very greatest rabbis of the Talmud, including Ben Zakai, Rabbi Ben Yohai, and Rabbi Akiba.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Book Israel, Our Duty, Our Dilemma, I detail how Judaism was corrupted by the occult and immoral practices of Babylon. Let's touch very briefly on just one aspect of such depravity, pederasty or the sexual molestation of children. Today, the greatest rabbis of the Talmud would be locked up as child molesters. Pederasty was deeply entrenched among the most respected Talmudic rabbis. It was taken for granted that the local rabbi could acquire a baby girl at three years of age as his sex toy simply by raping her. Here are several passages from many in the Talmud granting such permission. In Nida 45 b, a woman asks, master, at what age may a woman marry? At the age of three years and one day, he told her. A girl of three years and one day may be betrothed by intercourse. Rabbi Joseph said, come in here, a maiden of three years old and a day may be acquired in marriage by When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl, it is nothing. The footnote to this passage says, tears come to the eye again and again. So does virginity come back to the little girl under three years. Although the Talmud forbids homosexuality among adult Jews, sodomy with small boys is permitted. Leviticus twenty thirteen forbids sexual relations between men. The Talmud, however, defines a boy under nine years of age as a minor, not a man. He is excluded from the biblical prohibition. Since the boy is not sexually mature, the Talmud teaches, he cannot throw guilt upon the rabbi who rapes him. Only he who is able to engage in sexual intercourse may throw guilt upon the active offender, whilst he who is unable to engage in sexual intercourse cannot. Speaker 1: It is significant that the pederasty we have mentioned is endorsed by the very greatest rabbis of the Talmud. These include Ben Zakai, rabbi Ben Yohai, and rabbi Akaba.

@JeffreyxEpstein - Jeff Epstein

https://t.co/4vx6HHQHwj

@JeffreyxEpstein - Jeff Epstein

Nick Fuentes has entered the antisemitic zone. https://t.co/4FTngELIH0

@JeffreyxEpstein - Jeff Epstein

@yusxiv https://t.co/iGc9vWsoLh

@JeffreyxEpstein - Jeff Epstein

@Mish_K_ Here, Mish from India acting Israeli. https://t.co/x1lMpoo2cL

@JeffreyxEpstein - Jeff Epstein

@uroz_susan59845 https://t.co/M7HOoHleqI

@JeffreyxEpstein - Jeff Epstein

@newchristt Wait until you read what you did to Iraqi people under the false pretext of weapons of mass destruction. You should be the last person to open that filthy mouth. https://t.co/3gn31wAFI5

View Full Interactive Feed