reSee.it - Related Post Feed

mazemoore
Posted - November 23, 2022 at 6:37 AM
Saved - February 11, 2025 at 10:16 PM

@mazemoore - MAZE

Elon Musk and AOC finally worked out their differences. The chemistry these two have is crazy. https://t.co/4dYzYAinqa

Video Transcript AI Summary
I apologize, but I'm breaking all the rules! We might make mistakes, but that's okay. One of the biggest problems in D.C. is inflated egos. I prefer no titles at all; it keeps things open and honest. I'm just being myself. Let's get started.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I apologize. No worries. Perfect. I'm breaking all the rules. I'm breaking all the rules. I guess, we might make some mistakes. Who knows? I think one of the biggest problems we have in DC is that everyone's egos are too big. I I actually just prefer to have no titles at all. You're opening yourself up. I'm just being me. Let's go. Yeah. Absolutely. Absolutely.
ResistanceGreat
Posted - January 20, 2024 at 9:44 PM
Saved - January 20, 2024 at 10:53 PM

@ResistanceGreat - The Great Resistance

Senator Kennedy tells us how he really feels. The stuff that comes out of his mouth. 😂🤣😅 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://t.co/ekTfl23MGH

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses dislike for police and suggests calling a crackhead for help instead. They also question why money is given to countries that hate the US. They make a crude comment about engaging in a sexual act. They mention the difficulty of life and insult those who enjoy trendy food and drinks. The speaker denies calling Senator Sanders an ignorant slut. They make nonsensical statements about stars, President Xi Jinping, and their car not running on fairy dust or unicorn power.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You hate cops just because of cops? The next time you get in trouble, call a crackhead. I put some lube on and got him on his knees, and I began to slide into him from behind. Don't know why we have to give money to countries that hate us. They should be able to hate us for free. Life is hard, but it's harder when you're stupid. Goat's some milk latte drinking, avocado toast eating Okay. I can't because I can't get my head that far up my rear end. Stick it up there checker. They can kiss my ass. The world still astounds you each time you look at a star. I mean, you call senator Sanders everything but an ignorant slut. That is not that is not true. And the record to reflect that I did not call senator Sanders an ignorant slut. Okay. You took president Xi Jinping and turned him side down and shook him. My car doesn't run off fairy dust. My car doesn't run off unicorn
JoshWalkos
Posted - June 28, 2024 at 3:35 AM
Saved - June 28, 2024 at 1:24 PM

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The moment Democrats realized they are going to lose in a landslide with this guy. https://t.co/HjBGMAhbjN

Video Transcript AI Summary
We can eliminate debt, provide childcare, elder care, and strengthen healthcare. Everyone should have access to the same benefits as during COVID. President Biden is thanked for beating Medicare. President Trump is criticized for destroying it.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We'd be able to right wipe out his debt. We'd be able to help make sure that all those things we need to do, childcare, elder care, making sure that we continue to strengthen our health care system, making sure that we're able to make every single solitary person eligible for what I've been able to do with the with the COVID excuse me, with dealing with everything we have to do with look, if we finally beat Medicare. Thank you, President Biden. President Trump? Was right. He did beat Medicare. He beat it to death, and he's destroying Medicare.
cb_doge
Posted - November 4, 2024 at 3:00 AM
Saved - November 4, 2024 at 2:06 PM

@cb_doge - DogeDesigner

Elon Musk shared his journey from supporting Democrats to supporting Republicans. He used to call himself a moderate Democrat. But now they have become the party of division and hate. As a result, he can no longer support them and will vote Republican. https://t.co/yNWhG197Oy

Video Transcript AI Summary
I've been labeled as far-right, which is inaccurate. My focus has been on electric vehicles, solar energy, and batteries to help the environment. I've historically identified as a moderate Democrat and even supported Obama. However, I believe the Biden administration is not moderate, and Kamala Harris's background reflects a more leftist ideology. We are at a critical juncture in America, facing a fork in the road. I see one path leading to prosperity and another, represented by Kamala, leading in the opposite direction. Although I may face backlash for my views, I want to express my honest opinion. I encourage those in the moderate camp to consider supporting Donald Trump for president.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you look at my track my record, it's I've actually been I'm I'm I'm not like since they tried to paint me as, like, a far right guy, which is absurd because I like making electric vehicles and, you know, solar and and batteries helping those environment. And, and and I actually I I, you know, I I supported Obama. I stood in line for 6 hours to shake Obama's hand when when he was running for president. And, you know, so it's not like I'm like some sort of dyed in the wool long term republic. I'm actually I call myself, you know, historically a moderate democrat and and but now I feel like we're really at at a critical juncture for the country. And, you know, I I think a lot of people thought, you know, the Biden administration would be a moderate administration, but it's not. And and, obviously, an an an an an even further left, administration with with Kamala. That's that's my honest opinion. I mean, her dad is literally I mean, she was brought up as a as an actual her dad is, like, is a is a Marxist economist. That's you can Google it. I mean, it's not a we're not making this up. You know? That's how she was brought up. So, and and we we we just we we wanna have a future that is prosperous, and and I I think we're just at this critical juncture. And, and it I think this is a case of the America, is is kind of at a fork in the road. And True. And I think it it will take it will take if the the path like, you are the path to prosperity, and I think Kamala is the opposite. Then that's my I mean, that's my honest opinion. I'm gonna I'm gonna get attacked like crazy, and, you know, I've also experienced quite a bit of low fare myself. And, but I'm just just trying to tell people my honest opinion, and and I I haven't been active in really active in politics before. And I'm just trying to point out that my track record historically has been moderate, if not moderate, slightly left. And and, so this is to people out there who are in the moderate camp to say, I think you should support, Donald Trump for president.
DogRightGirl
Posted - December 19, 2024 at 4:13 PM
Saved - December 19, 2024 at 8:27 PM

@DogRightGirl - Spitfire

I CANT BELIEVE @elonmusk HAS ANY INFLUENCE ON POLITICIANS!!!!!! How DARE he!! https://t.co/iaL6NpbdmE

TheChiefNerd
Posted - February 4, 2025 at 11:18 AM
Saved - February 4, 2025 at 3:58 PM

@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd

SEN. JOHN KENNEDY: “The USAID are screaming like they're part of a prison riot because they don't want us reviewing the spending. But that's all @elonmusk is doing. And he's finding some pretty interesting stuff … Just what the President said he was going to appoint Musk to do.” https://t.co/etfGizrxEI

Video Transcript AI Summary
President Trump promised to review federal spending, and that's what Musk is doing. Some Democratic colleagues are upset about this review, but it's necessary. For four years, the focus has been on who should pay more taxes, while Republicans are asking where the money went. Examples of questionable spending include $520 million for ESG investments in Africa and $45 million for DEI scholarships in Burma. Democrats are not defending this spending but are instead focused on process and authority. Musk has the president's backing to examine these expenditures. It would be beneficial to compile this spending into a booklet and publicly address each item, challenging Democrats to defend it, which they likely cannot do.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now President Trump ran for office saying, I'm gonna review every single penny in the federal budget. Now how are you gonna review the spending in the federal budget without reviewing the spending? And that's what mister Musk is doing. Now my many of my Democratic colleagues and some of the, the tofu eating will karate at the USAID are screaming like they're part of a prison riot because they don't want us reviewing the spending. But that's all mister Musk is doing, and he's finding some pretty interesting, stuff to my to my friends who who are upset. I would say with respect, you know, call somebody who cares. Yeah. They better get used to this. It's USAID today. It's gonna be Department of Education tomorrow. And really, here's what's going on. For 4 years under president Biden, the people in charge ask one simple question. Who needs to pay more in taxes? Who needs to pay more in taxes? Well, that's not the question that the Republicans and president Trump are gonna ask. Our question is what the hell happened to the money? And that's all that's going on. Speaker 1: 520,000,000 for consultant driven ESG investments in Africa, 45,000,000 to DEI Scholarships in Burma. Why are your democratic colleagues seemingly more freaked out about cutting USAID? This is our money. Do you know how much it a $1,000,000 is? 520? I mean, the we have we're spending 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars over the years on this madness. What are they thinking? We have 4 trillion debt. Speaker 0: If if you notice, my Democratic colleagues in the USAID officials, they're not defending the spending. All they're talking about is process. Oh, it's an insurrection, and Elon Musk doesn't have the authority. Well, sure he has the authority. The president gave it to him. And all he's doing is looking at the spending. Just what the president said he was going to appoint Musk to do. Here's what I hope Rubio and must do. I would put together all this absurd spending into a booklet. I'd call a press conference, and in front of God and country and the corporate media and the USAID folks and my democratic colleagues, I'd go over it item by item by item, every bit of it. The DEI comic books, the transgender operas, the funding of, gain a function research. I'd go over every bit of it and say now, do you want to defend this? And they won't. They can't.
DonaldJTrumpJr
Posted - February 5, 2025 at 2:14 PM
Saved - February 5, 2025 at 5:02 PM

@DonaldJTrumpJr - Donald Trump Jr.

“I didn’t vote for Elon Musk”🥴 Well cry harder libs. We didn’t vote for this clown either, yet he controls the democrat party. The difference is Trump ran & was elected in a landslide with full transparency that Elon would be doing exactly what he’s doing. See the difference? https://t.co/wg5fQhjaFP

elonmusk
Posted - February 7, 2025 at 4:42 AM
Saved - February 8, 2025 at 9:42 AM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Thanks

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Ready to have your mind blown? Senator John Kennedy on Elon Musk and DOGE exposing USAID, “I'll tell you what Mr. Musk discovered. I find it fascinating. He discovered: - The American taxpayers are giving money to Afghanistan - He found that we are giving money to Yemen - He found that we are giving money to Syria - He found that the USAID has 10,000 people employees, and every year they give away $40 billion - He found that the USAID gave money to support electric vehicles in Vietnam. Our money, taxpayer money - He found that the USAID gave money to a transgender clinic in India. “I didn't know that. I bet you the American people didn't know that” - He found that USAID gave $1.5 million to a Serbian LGBTQ group, they got $1.5 million to QUOTE, “advanced diversity, equity, inclusion in Serbia's workplaces and business communities” - They found that USAID spent $164 million to support radical organizations around the world - They gave $122 million of that to groups aligned with foreign terrorist organizations - According to this report in Mr. Musk, the USAID has given millions of dollars to quote organizations in Gaza controlled by Hamas - He found that we gave $2 million, USAID did, for sex changes in Guatemala - He found that we gave $20 million to produce a new Sesame Street show in Iraq - He found that we gave $4.5 million of taxpayer money to combat misinformation in Kazakhstan - He found that we gave $10 million, USAID did, of meals to an al-Qaeda-linked terrorist group called the Nusra Front - Mr. Musk found that we gave $7.9 million of taxpayer money to a project that would teach Sri Lankan journalists to avoid binary gendered language. (The USAID took 8 million bucks and gave it to a bunch of journalists in Sri Lanka to teach them how to avoid binary gendered language) - USAID gave $1.5 million to promote LGBT advocacy in Jamaica - They gave $1.5 million to rebuild the Cuban media ecosystem - They gave $1.5 million for quote, art for inclusion of people with disabilities in Belarus - Another $3.9 million for LGBT causes in Macedonia - $8.3 million for equity and inclusion education in Nepal “I could go all night and many of my colleagues are upset. They're really mad at Mr. Musk. Hell, I think we ought to give him a medal”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Musk uncovered that American taxpayers fund foreign aid, including significant amounts to countries like Afghanistan, Yemen, and Syria. The USAID employs 10,000 people and distributes $40 billion annually. Notably, taxpayer money supported electric vehicles in Vietnam, a transgender clinic in India, and an LGBTQ group in Serbia. A report revealed that USAID allocated $164 million to radical organizations, including $122 million to those linked to foreign terrorist groups, and millions to Gaza organizations controlled by Hamas. Other expenditures included $2 million for sex changes in Guatemala, $20 million for a new Sesame Street show in Iraq, and $8 million for teaching Sri Lankan journalists about gendered language. Additionally, funds were given for LGBT advocacy in Jamaica, rebuilding Cuban media, and equity education in Nepal. Many are upset with Musk for exposing this, but some believe he deserves recognition.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. Listen up. Now mister Musk started with the USAID. That handles handles a lot of, foreign aid for America. American people are very generous. But I tell you what mister Musk discovered. I found it it fascinating. He discovered that the American taxpayers are giving money to, Afghanistan. He found that we are giving money to Yemen. He found that we are giving money to Syria. I didn't know that. Some of our foreign aid is going to Yemen, Afghanistan, Syria. He found that the USAID has 10,000 people, 10,000 people, employees. And every year, they give away $40,000,000,000. He he found that the USAID, gave money to support electric vehicles in Vietnam. Our money, taxpayer money. He found that, USAID gave money to a transgender clinic in India. I didn't know that. I bet the American people didn't know that. He found that, USAID gave $1,500,000 to a Serbian LGBTQ group called Grupa is Ladji. I probably mispronounced that, my apologies. Advance diversity, equity, inclusion in Serbia's workplaces and business community. He he reviewed a study and then went and checked it. The study was done by the Middle East Forum. They found that USAID spent $164,000,000 to support radical organizations around the world. We're not talking cub scout troops here. We're talking about radical organizations around the world. They gave a hundred and $22,000,000 of that to groups aligned with foreign terrorist organizations. Our taxpayer money. According to this report in mister Musk, the USAID has given millions of dollars to, quote, organizations in Gaza controlled by Hamas. Why why why aren't my colleagues talking about that? Recipients of the money they found have called for their lands to be cleansed from the impurity of Jews. That's over, did my foreign aid to? I kinda find what he's found out interesting. He found that we gave $2,000,000 USAID gift for sex changes in Guatemala. He found that we gave $20,000,000 to produce a new Sesame Street show in Iraq. He found that we, we gave $4,500,000 of taxpayer money to combat this disinformation in Kazakhstan. He found that we gave $10,000,000 USAID did, of meals to an Al Qaeda linked terrorist group called the Nusra Front. Mr. Musk found that we gave $7,900,000 of taxpayer money to a project that would teach Sri Lankan journalists to avoid binary gendered language. We took the USAID took $8,000,000 and gave it to a bunch of journalists in Sri Lanka to teach them how to avoid binary gendered language. I don't know what the hell binary gendered language is. I think I do. You think most taxpayers would support that? Why are we talking about that? All USAID gave $1,500,000 to promote LGBT advocacy in Jamaica. They gave $1,500,000 to rebuild the Cuban media ecosystem. They gave $1,500,000 for, quote, art for inclusion of people with disabilities in Belarus. Another $3,900,000 for LGBT causes in Macedonia, Eight Point Three Million Dollars for equity and inclusion education in Nepal. I could I could go all night. And many of my colleagues are upset. They're really mad at mister Musk. Hell, I think we ought to give him a medal.
KanekoaTheGreat
Posted - February 7, 2025 at 9:38 PM
Saved - February 8, 2025 at 10:20 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see my Democratic colleagues upset about Elon Musk and DOGE, but they’re missing the bigger picture. Musk has uncovered significant issues, like the massive spending at USAID, which amounts to hundreds of millions, possibly billions, that they should be addressing instead.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

Sen. John Kennedy: Democrats Critical of DOGE Are Not Talking About What Elon Musk Is ‘Finding’ "A lot of my Democratic colleagues and members of the tofu crowd are very upset and screaming like Musk stole their dog. But they are not talking about what Mr. Musk is finding. Just at the USAID, he found hundreds of millions, maybe billions of dollars of spending p*rn."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator John Kennedy expressed his appreciation for the current president's willingness to engage with the press, contrasting it with the previous administration. He emphasized the importance of reviewing government spending, highlighting concerns over waste in Medicaid. Kennedy noted that while Medicaid spending is around a trillion dollars annually, many able-bodied individuals are on the program. He proposed a bill requiring those aged 18 to 55, who are not disabled and have no minor children, to work at least 20 hours a week, which could save about $100 billion over ten years. He argued that work is not only financially beneficial but also morally important, as these programs should help individuals transition back to self-sufficiency.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: With that, we bring in Louisiana Republican senator John Kennedy. Senator, always good to have you with us. What was your reaction as you watch this sort of longer than usual freewheeling, press conference with these two foreign leaders? Speaker 1: Well, not number one. I find it refreshing after four years, where our president wouldn't wouldn't talk to anyone. Number two, I was paying especially close attention to what the president had to say about reviewing spending. I think it would be fair to say that president Trump has dug in like a tick. He's gonna continue. He ran on this issue. He said if if you elect me president, I'm gonna review the spending. Now I don't know how you review the spending without reviewing the spending. No no no fair minded person can doubt that the president of The United States has the authority to review the spending in the Executive Branch. He's, he's delegated that authority to Elon Musk. A lot of my Democratic colleagues and most of the members of the tofu crowd are very upset. They're screaming like Musk stole their dog or something. But one thing they're not talking about is, is what Mr. Musk is finding. I mean, just at the USAID, he found hundreds of millions, maybe billions of dollars worth of of spending porn. Speaker 0: Senator, let me ask you something. That If I may, you wrote a piece about Medicaid saying that there is a ton of waste in Medicaid. And you heard president Trump just moments ago. He said we're not gonna touch Social Security, but he said that there are a lot of, bad people who shouldn't be on the list, something to that effect when it comes to Medicaid. What did you find and write about this week with regard to Speaker 1: that? The American people are the most generous people in the world. If you're If you're hungry, we'll feed you. If you're homeless, we'll house you. If you're too poor to be sick, we'll pay for your doctor. But all of it costs money. We're spending about a trillion dollars a year on Medicaid. President Biden increased it by about 40%. We estimate that there are between ten and thirty million people on Medicaid who are perfectly able to work. I've got a bill that says if you're between 18 and 55, five, you're not disabled, you don't have any minor kids at home, so we're not talking about a mother with a sick child in her arms. You you've gotta work twenty hours a week. That'll save us, according to the CBO, about a hundred billion dollars over ten years. Speaker 0: That yeah. Right there. Speaker 1: It's not just about the money. It's not just about the money. There's a moral principle. If you can work, you should work. These programs were not meant to be parking lots. They were meant to be bridges. And for some people, not everybody on Medicaid, but for some people, the best way to to get back on your feet is to get off your ass. Speaker 0: Well, well put. And, the the piece that you were was very interesting, and the idea is that if you are able-bodied and you're accepting Medicaid, you should be working as well, gainfully employed. Yep. And, it's an idea that I think would be common sense to a lot of people. You also pointed out the psychological benefits of of going to work and having a job and that that is what pulls people out of situations where they need this kind of aid. Interesting piece and senator, thank you very much. It's always good to have you with us. Thank you, sir. Speaker 1: Thank you, Mark.
RealAmVoice
Posted - February 11, 2025 at 9:38 PM
Saved - February 12, 2025 at 12:15 AM

@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)

“THE PUBLIC VOTER FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP, THE PEOPLE VOTED FOR MAJOR GOVERNMENT REFORM, AND THAT’S WHAT THE PEOPLE ARE GOING TO GET.” - @elonmusk responds to criticism of how he is running DOGE. President @realDonaldTrump https://t.co/UG9iWlFBWs

Video Transcript AI Summary
My critics, including many Democrats, accuse me of orchestrating a hostile, non-transparent government takeover. However, the public clearly voted for major government reform, which is exactly what they'll get. We're committed to transparency; our actions are posted on X and our website. We're implementing simple, basic checks and balances to ensure taxpayer money is used responsibly and correctly categorized. This isn't about individual judgment calls; it's about systemic improvements. Concerns about conflicts of interest, particularly regarding my past federal contracts, are addressed through our commitment to transparency and the implemented checks and balances. All our actions are public.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Your detractors, mister Muskelet I've what? Including a lot of Democrats. Speaker 1: I have detractors? You do, sir. I don't believe it. Speaker 0: Say that you're orchestrating a hostile takeover of government and doing it in a non transparent way. What's your response to that criticism? Speaker 1: Well, first of all, you couldn't ask for a stronger mandate from from the public. The public voted, you know, that we we do have a majority of the public vote voting for president Trump, won the house, won the senate. The people voted for major government reform. There should be no doubt about that. That was on the campaign. The president spoke about that at every rally. The people voted for for major government reform, and that's what people are gonna get. They're gonna get what they voted for. And and a lot of times that, you know, people that don't get what they voted for, but in this presidency, they are gonna get what they voted for. And that's what democracy is all about. Speaker 0: Mister Vasquez, the White House says that you will identify and excuse yourself from any conflicts of interest that you may have. Does that mean that you are are in effect policing yourself? What are the checks and balances that are in place to ensure that there is accountability and transparency? Well, Speaker 1: we we actually are trying to be as transparent as possible. In fact, our actions we post our actions to the the Doge handle, on x, and to the the Doge website. So all of our actions, which are are maximally transparent. In fact, I don't think there's been I I don't know the case that where where, an organization has been more transparent than the Doge organization. K. And and so, you know and and the kind of things we're doing are, I think, very, very simple and basic. They're they're not we're we're you know, what I mentioned, for for example, about treasury, just making sure that that payments that go out, taxpayer money that goes out, is categorized correctly, that the that the the payment is explained, that organizations on the do not pay list, which are takes a lot to get there, that actually are not paid, which currently they are paid. These these are these are not individual judgment decisions. These are about simply having sensible checks and balances in the system itself to ensure that taxpayer money is spread well. So it's got nothing to do with, like, say, a contract with some company of mine at all. Speaker 0: But if there is a conflict in of interest when it comes to you, yourself, for instance, you've received billions of dollars in federal contracts when it comes to the Pentagon, for instance, which the president, I know, has directed you to look into Yeah. Are you policing yourself in that? Is there any sort of accountability check and balance in place that would provide any transparency for the American people? Well, all of our actions are are, sec.
BGatesIsaPyscho
Posted - February 11, 2025 at 10:17 PM
Saved - February 11, 2025 at 11:57 PM

@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen

UK Legacy Media In absolute meltdown over Musk & Trump exposing corrupt Government fraud. Sky News have the audacity to pretend that the American people don’t want this. https://t.co/yY2YLEOoCS

Video Transcript AI Summary
That picture of President Trump and Elon Musk in the Oval Office will be iconic when the story of Trump's second term is told. It depicts a remarkable event: the President justifying a large-scale attack on the federal government. The main criticism is the lack of accountability. Trump campaigned on reforming government and rooting out waste, but the methods—including Musk's involvement and mass firings—were unexpected. The actions haven't provided the detailed justification the American people deserve. Yalda rightly pointed out that if elected representatives can't carry out the will of the people, we don't have a democracy. Calling the bureaucracy an unconstitutional branch of government is inaccurate. However, Trump's actions are facing legal challenges, with judges objecting to actions such as mass firings at USAID and restricting access to the treasury payment system. The debate is ongoing, and Trump's team is relying on the legal system and public opinion.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, looking at these pictures, when the story of Donald Trump, certainly the Donald Trump second presidency is told, I think that picture will be near the top. A a quite remarkable, event. That's the president of The United States, justifying a full scale assault on the federal government in the Oval Office with, with Elon Musk by his side. I mean, the most awkward news conference starring the most awkward man with his son picking his nose, and Musk, you know, talking as he does in slogans. And I think that's part of the problem, actually. You know? This is an individual sent in to root out waste and abuse in government. I think most of the country is for that. What they haven't seen is accountability. That's the main criticism, and I'm not sure they got much of it there. But to your point about elected representatives, people voting for something and individuals to do their work, then, no, we're not seeing that. Yes, Donald Trump. Iran on a platform of disrupting, of reforming government, and indeed rooting out waste. But nobody saw Elon Musk coming. Nobody saw the the half dozen young men that, have been sent into these federal agencies to sack people by the thousand. And, as I say, to this point, not justify it. Don't not deliver the kind of accountability and detailed justification that America probably wants to see. Certainly, the workers at the heart of this want to see. I think, Yalda actually, just let me refer to one line he came away with. If people can't vote and have their will decided by elective elected representatives, a president and a senate. We don't have a democracy. He then said, we have this unconstitutional branch of government. The bureaucracy doesn't match the will of the people. Well, the will of the people very much, over time has been to construct a layer of bureaucracy to deal with America's interests, the interests of the people, whether that's social security payments or high finance. So, you know, describing bureaucracy as an unconstitutional branch of government is a stretch to say the least. But what I would say, Ialda, is that I think they've been bounced into this, by the objections of more than one judge around the country. Trump opened this news conference by talking about billions of waste and fraud. Hard to believe, he said, that a judge could say we don't want you to weed out corruption. He called that a very serious violation. There is a, a debate going on here right now on the back of judges' objections on matters like sacking thousands at USAID, closing that down, the business of access to the treasury central payment system. Separate judges have said you cannot do that, and we see this debate now. Certainly, team Trump are leaning on the judges, leaning on the legal system, leaning on public
KoryYeshua
Posted - February 13, 2025 at 1:40 AM
Saved - February 13, 2025 at 12:02 PM

@KoryYeshua - Kory Yeshua

Democrat congresswoman Maxine Waters says the quiet part out loud when talking about Trump and Elon. https://t.co/tzi6l5gmhB

Video Transcript AI Summary
The left is not worried about democracy, they are worried about being exposed. All the shady things they've been doing in the dark with American tax dollars is about to come to light. If they had nothing to hide, they wouldn't be going so crazy about it. A defensive reaction to an accusation can indicate guilt. We're seeing a bunch of guilty politicians complaining after Elon Musk has been going into the books and finding hundreds of millions of our tax dollars going to nonsense. Just yesterday, we saw Elon talking about investigating federal employees who have a high net worth despite low pay. For many years, many people were afraid of the government. Now the tables are turning and the government is afraid of the people. It's all coming out now.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The people of this country are being violated because all of our privacy is being taken up by, Elon Musk and Trump, and we don't know what all they have on us. We don't know what all they have on us. Speaker 1: That, my fellow Americans, is what we like to call a Freudian slip, which is when you unintentionally reveal your subconscious feelings. Democrats aren't freaking out about Trump and Elon Musk because they're trying to protect democracy. They're freaking out because all the dirt they've been doing in the dark is about to come to light. And the American people are about to find out just how corrupt many of these politicians actually are. They want Elon to go away because he's exposing what exactly it is that they've been doing with American tax dollars. They had nothing to hide, they wouldn't be going as ballistic as they are. There's an old American expression that says a hit dog will holler, which means a defensive reaction to an accusation can indicate guilt. And right now, what are we seeing? A bunch of hit dogs hollering after Elon's been going into the books and finding our tax dollars going to a bunch of crap, and we're talking about in the hundreds of millions. And just yesterday, we saw Elon talking about Doge investigating federal employees who have a high net worth despite low pay. And, oh, boy, these politicians are really losing it. See, for many years, many people were afraid of the government. And now the tables are turning and the government is afraid of the people. Yeah. It's all coming out now. And we're about to find out just exactly what it is that they have on politicians like you.
nicksortor
Posted - February 13, 2025 at 8:23 PM
Saved - February 13, 2025 at 11:49 PM

@nicksortor - Nick Sortor

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump ROASTS Mitch McConnell as the Senator spirals into disgrace and votes against RFK Jr “I feel sorry for Mitch. He's not equipped to be leader, mentally. He never was. Under him, the Republican Party was going to heII.” https://t.co/13pbvF76Qt

Video Transcript AI Summary
Mitch McConnell wasn't mentally equipped to lead, even a decade ago. If I hadn't come along, the Republican Party wouldn't exist today. McConnell's influence came from fundraising due to his leadership position; senators took his money, but it wasn't true loyalty. I pushed him out of leadership, so he's not a fan of mine. His vote against Bobby is a vote against me, but that's okay, he did endorse me in the past. I don't know RFK Jr's health status, but McConnell shouldn't have been a leader. He's bitter and has lost his power, affecting his votes. Bobby did great and will do phenomenally in his new position, as did others, like Tulsi.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: RFK Junior as the next health secretary citing conspiracy theories. What's your reaction to that? Well, I feel sorry for Mitch. And I was one of the people that led he couldn't he wanted to go to the end, and he wanted to stay leader. He wasn't he's not equipped mentally. He wasn't equipped ten years ago mentally, in my opinion. He'd let the Republican Party go to hell. If I didn't come along, the Republican Party wouldn't even exist right now. Mitch McConnell never really had it. He had an ability to raise money because of his position as leader, which anybody could do. You could do it even, and it's saying a lot. But, the fact is that he raised money and he gave a lot of money to senators, and so he had a little loyalty based on the fact that as leader, you could raise a lot of money. Senators would call me and they say, he wants to give me $2,025,000,000. Can I take it? I'd say, take the money. Take the money. But he so he engendered a certain amount of I don't even call it loyalty. He, you know, was able to get votes. But, I was the one that got him to drop out of the leadership position, so he can't love me. But he's not voting against Bobby. He's voting against me, but that's alright. He endorsed me. You know, Mitch do you know that Mitch endorsed me? Right? Well, he did. You think that was easy? What? He he had polio, obviously, and his I don't know I don't know anything about he had polio. He had polio. Are you doubting if he had polio? I have no idea if he had polio. All I can tell you about him is that he shouldn't have been a leader. He knows that. He voted against Bobby. He votes against almost everything now. He's a, you know, very bitter guy. And, we we have a very strong party, and he's almost not even really a very powerful member. And I'd say he's not a he's lost his power, and, it's affected his vote. And, you know, it's one of those things. But in the meantime, Bobby did great, got more votes than anybody thought, and I think he's gonna do phenomenally, just phenomenally in that position. And everybody else likewise did well. Not only well, they got more votes than anybody thought. Tulsi, look at how she did. She did great.
america
Posted - February 14, 2025 at 11:07 PM
Saved - February 15, 2025 at 2:20 PM

@america - America

President Trump discusses how legacy media attempted and failed to drive he and Elon Musk apart. https://t.co/Qo1hP5wlxH

Video Transcript AI Summary
The media and punditry threw everything they had at me, but they didn't win. Now they want to drive a wedge between Elon and me, even suggesting I've ceded control of the presidency to him. But it's so obvious what they're doing. They're not even good at it. If they were, I never would have become president. I get 98% bad publicity, but the people are smart. They see what's happening.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Aware, you have to be keenly aware that the media and and the punditry class, not that you know, I think you've proven they have no power anymore, because they threw everything they had at you, and they didn't win. And that was, you know, the New York Times, Washington Post, three networks, every late night comedy show, two cable channels. They they just threw they threw everything, lawfare, weaponization. And now I see they want you two to start they they want a divorce. They want you two to start hating each other, and they try oh, President Elon Musk, for example. You do know that they're doing that to you. Speaker 1: Oh, I see it all the time. They they tried it, then they stopped. That wasn't they have many different things, of hatred. Actually, Elon called me. He said, you know, they're trying to drive us apart. I said, absolutely. No. They said, we have breaking news. Donald Trump has ceded control of the presidency to Elon Musk. President Musk will be attending a cabinet meeting tonight at 08:00. And I say Yeah. It's just so obvious. They're so bad at it. I used to think they were good at it. They're actually bad at it because if they were good at it, I'd never be president. Because I I think nobody in history has ever gotten more bad publicity than me. I could do the greatest things. I get 98% bad publicity. I could do outside of you Speaker 0: and a Speaker 1: few of your very good friends. Right. It's like the craziest thing. But you know what I have learned, Elon? The people are smart. They get it. Speaker 0: Yeah. They do actually. Speaker 1: They get it. They really see what's happening. Yes.
libsoftiktok
Posted - February 18, 2025 at 5:06 PM
Saved - February 18, 2025 at 8:49 PM

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

SEN. JOHN KENNEDY: DEMS PUT SPENDING PORN AHEAD OF TAXPAYERS! "They mismanaged COVID, the economy, inflation, the debt, Afghanistan. They support illegal immigration over the law, trans athletes over women, Hamas over Israel. https://t.co/Qn9H6gs3A9

Video Transcript AI Summary
If my Democrat friends asked for advice, I'd tell them to try harder not to fail. Over the last four years, they've mismanaged Congress, COVID, the economy, inflation, the national debt, and Afghanistan. In opposing Trump and Musk, they've sided with bureaucrats and excessive spending over taxpayers, just like they support illegal immigration over the rule of law, transgender athletes over women's sports, and Hamas over Israel. Not all Democrats are like this, but the party is controlled by online activists who believe men can breastfeed, are triggered by race, and get upset over pronouns. Most Americans see this as extreme, and that's what's hurting the Democrats.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've got a lot of friends who are Democrats, and they haven't asked me for advice. But if I did, I'd tell them, look. You just gotta try harder not to suck. I mean, think about it. Over the past four years, the Democrats mismanaged Congress. They mismanaged COVID. They mismanaged the economy. They mismanaged inflation. They mismanaged the national debt. They mismanaged Afghanistan. More recently, in their opposition to president Trump and mister Musk, the Democrats have chosen to support the bureaucrats and the spending porn over the American taxpayer, Just like they support illegal immigration over, over the rule of law. Just like they support transgender athletes over women's sports. Just like they support Hamas terrorists over Israel. All Democrats are not like this, but the the party is controlled right now by people who majored in online activism with a minor in puberty blockers. I I know these people. They think women they they think men they think men can breastfeed. They're triggered by race. They cry if you if you use the wrong pronoun. And and most fair minded Americans look at this and they go, these people are about 10 exits past normal. And and that's what's killing the Democrats right now, in my opinion.
nicksortor
Posted - March 4, 2025 at 4:46 PM
Saved - March 4, 2025 at 9:07 PM

@nicksortor - Nick Sortor

🚨 UPDATE: An ASTOUNDING **22** Democrat Senators have uploaded videos of themselves reading off an identical cringey script bashing Trump and Musk This is a REALLY tough watch 🤣 Just remember: the Democrats think you’re all stupid. https://t.co/zA9bVLyJlb

nicksortor
Posted - March 7, 2025 at 8:37 PM
Saved - March 7, 2025 at 11:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just saw President Trump call out an NBC reporter for falsely claiming there was a clash between Elon Musk and Marco Rubio. He emphasized there was no clash and accused the reporter of being a troublemaker. It seems like they're really trying to create division between Elon and Trump, but it's not working.

@nicksortor - Nick Sortor

🚨 President Trump just SLAMMED a fake news NBC reporter for claiming there was a “CLASH” between Elon Musk and Marco Rubio during a cabinet meeting “No clash. I was there. You're just a troublemaker” They’re trying SO hard to rip Elon and Trump apart, and it ain’t working. These attempts are getting incredibly desperate

Video Transcript AI Summary
There was no clash between the secretaries, despite what you may have heard. You're just stirring up trouble and asking irrelevant questions. We're here to discuss the World Cup. Elon and Marco are working well together and doing an excellent job. There is no conflict between them. I won't answer your question about who I support; it's off-topic. Of course, you're with NBC. That explains your line of questioning. That's enough. Let's keep the discussion focused on the World Cup. Are there any other relevant questions?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Clashes eventually. New secretary removed the other secretary. No clash. I was there. You're just a troublemaker. And you're not supposed to be asking that question because we're talking about the World Cup. Elon gets along great with Marco, and they're both doing a fantastic job. There is no clash. Mister president, who's bottom line Who are you with? Who are you with? NBC. Oh, no wonder. That's enough. NBC. Who has more authority? Elon Musk or the captaincy chair? Any other questions about the World Cup?
RealJamesWoods
Posted - March 16, 2025 at 3:59 PM
Saved - March 17, 2025 at 2:59 PM

@RealJamesWoods - James Woods

While Democrats bawl like angry toddlers and key Teslas in acts of terrorism, Republicans like @elonmusk take private enterprise to the heavens. Here are SpaceX astronauts rescuing fellow Americans abandoned by Joe Biden. This is America at its finest. https://t.co/CtZOpG7cQW

Video Transcript AI Summary
The station hatch is open. Dragon, SpaceX is communicating with ground control regarding crew status. Vapor on Dragon is speaking with Mike at ground control. Ground control is checking in on the progress of Butch and Nick as they move through vestibule pressurization. They are also inquiring about the status of the crew's inventory reports and note about twenty minutes remaining on soot drying. Vapor confirms about twenty minutes on soot drying, that 1.5 crew members have changed, and the other two are doing inventory and packing. They will also provide water and feed inventory. SpaceX acknowledges. The crew inside Dragon is speaking with SpaceX's Mission Control in Hawthorne, California.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Houston on two. Seals look good. No condensation. Houston copies. Speaker 1: Station hatch is now open. Speaker 2: And Dragon, SpaceX on Dragon to ground for crew status. Speaker 0: Hey, Mike. It's Vapor on Dragon to Ground. Go ahead. Speaker 2: Hey, Vapor. Just wanted to, check-in since I see Butch and Nick are moving pretty close through the vestibule pressurization and, those tasks there. So just wanted to get a status on your guys' inventory reports. And I see about twenty minutes on soot drying and just wanted to to check-in. Speaker 0: Yep. We're checking about twenty minutes on soot drying as well. You've got 1.5 of us changed, and then the other two are doing the inventory and packing right now. And we'll get you the water and feed inventory too. Speaker 2: Okay. SpaceX copies all. Speaker 1: So as a read back, you can hear the crew inside Dragon speaking with the core that's over at SpaceX's Mission Control in Hawthorne, California.
DefiyantlyFree
Posted - March 18, 2025 at 2:25 AM
Saved - March 18, 2025 at 7:15 AM

@DefiyantlyFree - Insurrection Barbie

When Barack Obama says it the left fawns. When Elon Musk says it the left burns Teslas. https://t.co/cR0mC8AhnX

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker introduces a campaign to cut government waste, stating that deficit reduction requires difficult choices, including cuts to valued programs. They claim there has been a tremendous amount of waste and fraud in the government during the Biden administration, estimating federal government fraud at half a trillion dollars. The goal is to reduce this figure, saving taxpayer money by stopping spending on things that very few taxpayers would agree makes sense. Examples cited include transgender animal surgeries and the presence of twenty million dead people in the Social Security database.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Everyone knows that getting rid of the deficit will require some tough decisions, and that includes cutting back on billions of dollars in programs that a lot of people care about. But what should be easy is getting rid of the pointless waste and stupid spending that doesn't benefit anybody. We're calling it the campaign to cut waste. Speaker 1: You know, there's been a tremendous amount of of waste and fraud in the in the government during the Biden administration, which estimated the the federal government fraud to be half a trillion dollars. What we're trying to do is get that number down to a much smaller figure, save money for the American taxpayer, stop money being spent on things that are that I think very few taxpayers would agree makes sense, You know, transgender animal surgeries or why are the twenty million people who are definitely dead mocked as alive in the Social Security database?
LegendaryEnergy
Posted - June 3, 2025 at 7:06 PM
Saved - June 5, 2025 at 9:04 PM

@LegendaryEnergy - An0maly

Elon Musk & Thomas Massie agree: Trump’s “Big, Beautiful Bill” is a scam https://t.co/qUDHjXR8tj

Acyn
Posted - June 4, 2025 at 7:14 PM
Saved - June 5, 2025 at 6:55 PM

@Acyn - Acyn

Kennedy: Musk is frustrated. I think he believes in my judgment correctly, that we're quickly becoming debt slaves—that congress needs to rearm the magical healing power of no, and I agree with it. Having said that, I'm not ready to throw in the towel on this bill. https://t.co/OpY5Zrrlvu

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses agreement with someone frustrated about the country becoming "debt slaves." This individual believes Congress needs to regain the ability to say "no." Despite this agreement, the speaker is not yet prepared to abandon the current bill.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He's frustrated. I think he believes in my judgment correctly that we're quickly becoming debt slaves, that congress needs to to reearn the magical healing power of no, and I agree with him. Having said that, I'm not ready to throw in the towel on this bill.
Bubblebathgirl
Posted - June 5, 2025 at 4:34 PM
Saved - June 5, 2025 at 9:01 PM

@Bubblebathgirl - Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

President Trump talks about Elon Musk. The media will try to take what he said here and turn it into a big deal. It’s not. I trust both Trump and Elon. I don’t think either men are the problem. You want to know who the real problem is? Congress. https://t.co/SMjLSZWFlb

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims to have had a great relationship with Elon, but is now disappointed. He believes Elon only developed a problem with the "great big beautiful bill" after the EV mandate was cut, which Elon knew about and initially supported. The speaker says the CBO, which is run by Democrats, projects a $2.8 trillion surplus over ten years if tariff revenue is included. He touts low inflation, down to 2%, and falling grocery and gasoline prices. He also claims the U.S. now has the best border in history with a 99.99% success rate. He speculates that people who leave his administration miss the "glamour" and become hostile, possibly due to "Trump derangement syndrome." He suggests that Elon may be experiencing something similar.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we're well anymore. I was surprised because you were here. Everybody in this room practically was here as we had a wonderful send off. He said wonderful things about me. You couldn't have nicer, said the best thing. He's worn the hat. Trump was right about everything. And I am right about the the great big beautiful bill. We call it a great big beautiful bill because that's what it is. And, again, biggest tax cuts in history, biggest economic development moves anywhere. We've never done anything like it. Business is spurred. And I don't know if you've seen the numbers, but the numbers came out. Even the CBO, which is run by Democrats, said that we're gonna be, doing you know, I'd like you to discuss it, the 2,800,000,000.0 a trillion that CBO. This is some a group of people that are Democrats. They're very hostile to us. They just came out with phenomenal numbers what it does. You wanna mention that, Scott? Speaker 1: Yes, sir. So what what we've seen is we keep hearing from the CBO that there's going to, be a large deficit from the bill, which we disagree with. But using the CBO scoring, they came out and scored the tariff revenue. We think it'll be the minimum of 2,800,000,000,000.0 over the ten year window, which actually puts the bill in surplus if you include the tariff revenue, which they won't do. Speaker 0: It gives you a tremendous surplus, but we're not allowed to use that. For some reason, they say scoring. Nobody knows what scoring means. Maybe a couple of people, but nobody. Somebody sits in the background, they say, well, we're not gonna allow that. They're not allowing other things that we have that are tremendously profitable for our country. But if you saw the other day, CNBC, they came out with, numbers and the people on the show, very good people. I've watched them for a long time. They couldn't believe the numbers, how good they are. The numbers were incredible. And that was personal income and also very low inflation. We have very low inflation. We're down to 2% now and maybe even lower than that. And when I took it over, was a mess. Remember, we had the worst inflation probably in the history of our country. They say forty eight years, but let's say that's I think it's worse than that. So we had the worst inflation in the history of our country under the Biden administration. Now we're down to beautiful number, 2%. We'd actually like to keep it there. Better than zero is 2%. It's going down maybe to 1% is like perfect. That's perfect. You don't wanna have zero for certain reasons that are that nobody is very interested to listen to, But we have almost perfect inflation. Grocery prices are down. Everything remember eggs eggs. We weren't gonna buy another egg for the next twenty years. It was so expensive. Right? Remember? You guys all hit me about eggs. Eggs have down 400%. Everybody has eggs now. They're having eggs for breakfast again. But if you look at, gasoline, very important. I think always the most important because it's the energy is a big the biggest factor. That's what He screwed up our energy policy and everything went up because energy went up. But now energy is way down and, they have states where you're at $1.98 a gallon for gasoline. So the costs have way have come way down. And one of the things I ran on was that. I ran on the border. We have the best border in the history of our country, 99.99%. It was, last week, three people came in. Two of them for medical reasons. We let them in because one of them had a heart attack. I think it was a nice thing to do, and one of them had something else. So we've never had I had very good numbers for four years, but we we really topped it. And I wanna thank Christie and Tom Homan. They've they've done a fantastic job, but nobody mentions that anymore. Remember, a few months ago, the border was a total disaster. People were coming in by the hundreds of thousands of people a day, a week, a month. I mean, we had a month 2,000,000 people came in in one month. The border was being overrun and a lot of bad people, criminals, murderers, drug dealers. We had some of the worst people in the world coming in from all over the world. It's totally closed. And you know what? People are coming into our country, but they're coming in legally. So we've done a great job. Elon knew that. Elon endorsed me very strongly. He actually went up in campaign for me. I think I would have won. Susie would say I would have won Pennsylvania easily anyway, even if the governor ran, the real governor, not the governor from Minnesota who's I mean, he's a sick puppy. That guy that poor guy feels sorry for him. But they they made a bad choice with him. But if you pick Shapiro or anybody else, I spoke to him recently about his, you know, his house being set on fire, which was terrible. But if they picked him, I would have won Pennsylvania. I won it by a lot. But I'm very disappointed because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here, better than you people. He knew everything about it. He had no problem with it. All of a sudden, he had a problem, and he only developed the problem when he found out that we're gonna have to cut the EV mandate because that's billions and billions of dollars, and it really is unfair. We wanna have cars of all types. Electric, we wanna have electric, but we wanna have a gasoline combustion. We wanna have different. We wanna have hybrids. We wanna have all we wanna be able to sell everything. And when that was cut, and congress wanted to cut it, he became a little bit different, and I can understand that. But he knew every aspect of this bill. He knew it better than almost anybody, and he never had a problem until right after he left. And if you saw the statements he made about me, which I'm sure you can get very easily, it's very fresh on tape, he said the most beautiful things about me. And he hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that'll be next. But I'm I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot. Speaker 1: Did that answer the president? Did he I just wanna clarify. Did he raise any of these concerns with you privately before he raised them publicly? And this is the guy you put in charge of cutting spending. Should people not take him seriously about spending now? Are you saying this is all sour grapes? Speaker 0: No. He worked hard, and he did a good job. And I'll be honest, think he misses the place. I think he got out there and all of a sudden he wasn't in this beautiful Oval Office and he was and he's got nice offices too. But there's something about this when I was telling the chancellor, this is where it is. People come in here, even from Germany. They come in and they they Germany. Walk into the Oval Office and it's just a special place. It's you know, World War one, it started and it ended here. And World War two and, so many other things. Everything big comes right from this this beautiful space. It's now much more beautiful than it was six months ago. A lot of good things are happening in this room. And I'll I'll tell you, it's not he's not the first. People leave my administration and they love us. And then at some point, they miss it so badly. And some of them embrace it and some of them actually become hostile. I don't know what it is. It's sort of Trump derangement syndrome, I guess they call it. But I we have it with others too. They leave and they wake up in the morning and the glamour's gone. The whole world is different and they become hostile. I don't know what it is. Someday you'll write a book about it and you'll let us know.
LauraLoomer
Posted - June 5, 2025 at 5:30 PM
Saved - June 5, 2025 at 6:25 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
It's heating up. I'm curious to see how Republican lawmakers will respond. I've spoken to some who are weighing whether to side with President Trump or Elon Musk. I've been on the hill all day, and this is the main topic of conversation—the most powerful man versus the richest man.

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

It’s heating up. Will be interesting to see what Republican lawmakers do now. I know law makers who are asking if they should side with President Trump or Elon. I’ve been on the hill all day and it’s all anyone is talking about. The most powerful man in the world vs the richest man in the world.

LauraLoomer
Posted - June 5, 2025 at 5:30 PM
Saved - June 5, 2025 at 6:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Laura Loomer noted a growing tension among Republican lawmakers regarding whether to support President Trump or Elon Musk, highlighting that this topic dominated discussions during her time on Capitol Hill. She emphasized the significance of the situation, framing it as a contest between the most powerful and the richest man in the world. In response, Elon Musk pointed out that while Trump has 3.5 years remaining in his presidency, he himself will be influential for over 40 years.

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

It’s heating up. Will be interesting to see what Republican lawmakers do now. I know law makers who are asking if they should side with President Trump or Elon. I’ve been on the hill all day and it’s all anyone is talking about. The most powerful man in the world vs the richest man in the world.

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

@LauraLoomer Oh and some food for thought as they ponder this question: Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years …

VigilantFox
Posted - June 5, 2025 at 7:13 PM
Saved - June 5, 2025 at 9:27 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The breakup between Trump and Musk is now official, marked by Trump’s comments about their past relationship and Musk's immediate rebuttals. Trump expressed disappointment over Musk's criticism of the Big Beautiful Bill, attributing it to financial motives related to EV subsidies. Musk countered, claiming Trump’s accusations were false and asserting his significant role in Trump’s election success. The tension escalated with Trump threatening to terminate Musk's government contracts, while Musk hinted at serious allegations against Trump. This unfolding drama highlights a significant political rift.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Trump/Musk breakup is now official. For the first time, Trump spoke out after Musk blasted the Big Beautiful Bill. But here’s the twist—Musk was watching live and firing back in real time on X. What happened next was painful to watch. Trump said, “Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don’t know if we will anymore.” Then Trump posted on Truth Social—and that’s when the gloves really came off. 🧵 THREAD

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

📍 And make sure to bookmark this thread—because no matter how this ends, we’re watching one of the greatest political alliances fall apart in real time. Let’s break it all down and roll the clips.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

It came out of nowhere, but it hit like a category five hurricane. President Trump was hosting German Chancellor Friedrich Merz when a reporter asked a question that immediately changed the energy in the room: “What’s your reaction to Elon Musk’s criticism of the Big Beautiful Bill?” The mood shifted. Trump didn’t hesitate. It was the beginning of what sounded like a very public political divorce. “I’ve always liked Elon,” Trump said. “So I was very surprised… He hasn’t said anything about me that’s bad.” Trump had stayed quiet for a while, but now, cornered with cameras rolling, he was ready to speak. “I’d rather have him criticize me than the bill,” Trump continued, praising the legislation as “incredible” and “the biggest cut in the history of our country… about $1.6 trillion.” Then came the pivot—and the reason for the rift, according to Trump. “Elon’s upset because we took the EV mandate,” he explained. “That was a lot of money for electric vehicles.” The way Trump described it, Musk’s problem wasn’t ideological—it was financial. “They want us to pay billions of dollars in subsidy. And Elon knew this from the beginning. He knew it a long time ago. That hasn’t changed.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker says he has always liked Elon Musk and is surprised by Musk's criticism regarding the bill. He would rather Musk criticize him than the bill because the bill is incredible, with $1.6 trillion in cuts, the biggest tax cut in history. The bill includes unbelievable benefits for small businesses, people, and middle-income individuals. Musk is upset because the EV mandate, which provided a lot of money for electric vehicles, was removed. Electric vehicle companies are having a hard time and want billions of dollars in subsidies. The speaker claims Musk knew about this from the beginning, and it hasn't changed.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you, mister president. The criticism that I've seen and I'm sure you've seen regarding Elon Musk and your big beautiful bill, what's your reaction to that? Do you think it in any way hurts passage in the senate, which is, of course, what is your seeking? Speaker 1: Well, look, you know, I've always liked Elon, and it's always very surprised. You saw the words he had for me, the words of and he hasn't said anything about me that's bad. I'd rather have him criticize me than the bill because the bill is incredible. It's the biggest cut in the history of our country. We've never cut. It's about 1,600,000,000,000.0 in cuts. It's the biggest tax cut. Tax, you would say, people people's taxes will go way down, but it's the biggest tax cut in history. It's we have we are doing things in that bill that are unbelievable. And when you look at what we're doing for small businesses, for people, for middle income people, all of the things that we're doing, nobody's ever seen anything like it. And, you know, Elon's upset because we took the EV mandate and you know, which was a lot of money for electric vehicles. And, you know, they're having a hard time with electric vehicles, and they want us to pay billions of dollars in subsidy. And, you know, I I Elon knew this from the beginning. He knew it for a long time ago. Speaker 0: That's been in there. That's been, Speaker 1: I would say, JD, that hasn't changed. That's been right from the beginning, mister I think, mister secretary. That hasn't changed at all right from the beginning. But I know that disturbed

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Musk responded to this immediately: “Whatever.” “Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill.” https://t.co/DNML9nbj3T

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Before we roll the next clip: if you’re not following me, you’re missing out on critical information. Hit the bell 🔔 to stay sharp and informed. → @VigilantFox Now, back to the story you came for. https://t.co/AfEghwSCHR

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

But the electric vehicle subsidies weren’t the only flashpoint. Trump pointed to another moment of quiet friction. He said Musk had personally pushed for Jared Isaacman to be nominated as NASA administrator. Trump turned him down. “He recommended somebody that he, I guess, knew very well. I’m sure he respected him,” Trump said. “But I didn’t think it was appropriate.” Why? “He happened to be a Democrat. Like, totally Democrat.” Then Trump drew the political line. “We won,” he said. “We get certain privileges. And one of the privileges is we don’t have to appoint a Democrat.” He reiterated that NASA would remain in capable hands. “General Cain is going to be picking somebody.” But the implication was clear: Musk had tried to insert his own pick into a key government role—and when he didn’t get his way, the relationship began to fracture. “He wanted that person. And we said no,” Trump said. “And I can understand why he’s upset.” Then came a striking moment of reflection. “Remember, he was here for a long time. You saw a man who was very happy when he stood behind the Oval Desk.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
He recommended someone he knew and respected to run NASA, but the speaker didn't think it was appropriate because the person was a Democrat. The speaker stated, "We won. We get certain privileges. And one of the privileges, we don't have to appoint a democrat." The speaker said NASA is very important and that General Cain will be picking someone, and they will be checking them out. The speaker understands why the person who made the recommendation is upset, noting "he was here for a long time" and "was very happy when he stood behind the oval desk."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He wanted and rightfully, you know, he recommended somebody from, that he, I guess, knew very well. I'm sure he respected him, but to run NASA. And I didn't think it was appropriate. And he happened to be a democrat, like, totally democrat. And I say, you know, look, we won. We get certain privileges. And one of the privileges, we don't have to appoint a democrat. NASA is very important. We have great people. General Cain is gonna be picking somebody with our we'll be we'll be checking them out and seeing, but he wanted that person, a certain person, and we said no. And, you know, I can understand why he's upset. Remember, he was here for a long time. You saw a man who was very happy when he stood behind the oval desk.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

That’s when Trump crossed a line you don’t cross unless something’s truly over, and he dropped a line that made it clear. He started using the past tense. “Look, Elon and I had a great relationship,” he said. “I don’t know if we will anymore.” It was unmistakable. The phrasing, the delivery—it sounded like someone processing a falling-out in real time. Trump recalled better days: public events, warm praise, and headlines they once created together. “I was surprised—because you were here,” he told the room. “Everybody in this room, practically, was here as we had a wonderful sendoff.” “He said wonderful things about me. You couldn’t have said nicer—said the best things.” “He’s worn the hat, ‘Trump Was Right About Everything.’” Then Trump added with a tone of wounded pride: “And I am right about the great, big beautiful bill.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Elon and the speaker had a great relationship, though the current status is uncertain. The speaker recalls a wonderful send-off where Elon said very nice and the "best" things. Elon wore the hat. The speaker believes Trump was right about everything. The speaker also believes they are right about the "great big beautiful bill," which they describe as the biggest tax cuts in history and the biggest economic development moves anywhere. They claim nothing like it has ever been done before.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we're well anymore. I was surprised because you were here. Everybody in this room practically was here as we had a wonderful send off. He said wonderful things about me. You couldn't have nicer. Said the best thing. He's worn the hat. Trump was right about everything. And I am right about the great big beautiful bill. We call it a great big beautiful bill because that's what it is. And, again, biggest tax cuts in history, biggest economic development moves anywhere. We've never done anything like it.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

As the comments continued, the emotion started bleeding through. Trump reminded everyone just how closely tied Musk had been to his movement. “Elon endorsed me very strongly,” he said. “He actually went up and campaigned for me.” But even in that, Trump made something else crystal clear: he believed he didn’t need Musk to win. “I think I would have won,” he said. “Susie would say I would have won Pennsylvania easily anyway.” “Even if the governor ran—the real governor, not the governor from Minnesota… He’s a sick puppy, that guy.” Then he doubled down: “If they picked him, I would have won Pennsylvania. I won it by a lot.” Trump was saying that Musk’s support was appreciated—but not essential. And that made the fallout easier to frame. “I’m very disappointed,” he said. “Because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here. Better than you people. He knew everything about it.” He circled back to the heart of the disagreement: the subsidies. “He had no problem with it. All of a sudden he had a problem—when he found out we’re going to have to cut the EV mandate. That’s billions and billions of dollars. And it really is unfair. We want to have cars of all types.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Elon endorsed the speaker and campaigned for them. The speaker believes they would have won Pennsylvania easily, even if the "real governor" or Shapiro had run. The speaker is disappointed because Elon, who initially knew the bill's inner workings and had no problem with it, suddenly developed a problem when he learned about the EV mandate cut. This cut would save billions of dollars but is considered unfair. The speaker wants cars of all types, including electric, gasoline, combustion, and hybrids, and wants to be able to sell everything. Elon became "different" when Congress wanted to cut the EV mandate, which the speaker understands. Elon knew every aspect of the bill better than almost anybody.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've done a great job. Elon knew that. Elon endorsed me very strongly. He actually went up and campaigned for me. I think I would have won. Susie would say I would have won Pennsylvania easily anyway, even if the governor ran, the real governor, not the governor from Minnesota who's I mean, he's a sick puppy. That guy that poor guy feels sorry for him. But, they they made a bad choice with him. But if you pick Shapiro or anybody else, I spoke to him recently about his, you know, his house being set on fire, which was terrible. But if they picked him, would have won Pennsylvania. I won it by a lot. But I'm very disappointed because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here, better than you people. He knew everything about it. He had no problem with it. All of a sudden, had a problem, and he only developed the problem when he found out that we're gonna have to cut the EV mandate because that's billions and billions of dollars, and it really is unfair. We wanna have cars of all types. Electric, we wanna have electric, but we wanna have a gasoline, combustion. We wanna have different. We wanna have hybrids. We wanna have all we wanna be able to sell everything. And when that was cut, and congress wanted to cut it, he became a little bit different, and I can understand that. But he knew every aspect of this bill. He knew it better than almost anybody.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

But Musk was ready and waiting. He weighed in on the president’s claim about Pennsylvania, and he took it one step further. Musk said: “Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.” He added: “Such ingratitude”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

And then Musk called out Trump’s claim that he knew the inner workings of the Big Beautiful Bill. “False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!” https://t.co/G1HQKpoIbo

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Back in the Oval Office, the mood darkened again as Trump made a quiet prediction. “He hasn’t said bad about me personally,” he said. “But I’m sure that’ll be next.” There was no mistaking it now. This was a full-blown breakup. “I’m very disappointed in Elon. I’ve helped Elon a lot,” Trump said, his voice tightening. A reporter jumped in, asking the obvious: Had Musk brought any of these concerns to him in private before blasting them in public? Trump didn’t dodge. “No,” he said flatly. “He worked hard and he did a good job.” Then came a flash of emotional insight—a glimpse into how Trump sees these departures. “I think he misses the place,” he said. “ He got out there, and all of a sudden he wasn’t in this beautiful Oval Office.” “And he was,” Trump added. “And he’s got nice offices too. But there’s something about this one.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses disappointment in Elon, stating, "I've helped Elon a lot." Speaker 1 asks if Elon raised concerns privately before making them public and questions whether Elon should be taken seriously about spending cuts, given his role in that area. Speaker 0 responds that Elon worked hard and did a good job, suggesting Elon misses his former position, noting the unique appeal of the Oval Office.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that'll be next. But I'm I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot. Speaker 1: Did he I just wanna clarify. Did he raise any of these concerns with you privately before he raised them publicly? And this is the guy you put in charge of cutting spending. Should people not take him seriously about spending now? Are you saying this is all sour grapes? Speaker 0: No. He worked hard and he did a good job. And I'll be honest, think he misses the place. I think he got out there and all of a sudden he wasn't in this beautiful Oval Office and he was and he's got nice offices too, but there's something about this

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

As the dust settled, Trump zoomed out. And what he said next felt like the conclusion to a pattern. “He’s not the first,” he said. “People leave my administration and they love us. And then at some point, they miss it so badly.” “Some of them embrace it. And some of them actually become hostile. I don’t know what it is.” Then, with a knowing smirk: “It’s sort of Trump Derangement Syndrome, I guess they call it.” It wasn’t just Musk anymore. Trump was describing a cycle—an emotional shift he believes happens to those who leave his orbit. “They leave and they wake up in the morning—and the glamor is gone. The whole world is different. And they become hostile. I don’t know what it is.” And then, he ended with: “Someday you’ll write a book about it and you’ll let us know.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
People leave my administration, and some miss it so badly that they either embrace it or become hostile. It's "Trump derangement syndrome," or they wake up and the glamour is gone, and the whole world is different, so they become hostile.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He's not the first. People leave my administration and they love us. And then at some point, they miss it so badly. And some of them embrace it and some of them actually become hostile. I don't know what it is. It's sort of Trump derangement syndrome, I guess they call it. But I we have it with others too. They leave and they wake up in the morning and the glamour's gone. The whole world is different and they become hostile. I don't know what it is. Someday you'll write a book about it and you'll let us know. Yeah.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

But after the Oval Office meeting was finished, the real fireworks started. President Trump took to Truth social and launched an all-out assault on Musk: “Elon was “wearing thin,” I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Trump followed up with: “The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon’s Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn’t do it!” https://t.co/RiAIVhss0R

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

That’s when Elon Musk blew up the internet with this response: “Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That’s the real reason they haven’t been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!” https://t.co/Kmrvc9RUKh

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@realDonaldTrump Elon added, “Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.” https://t.co/fxAz5x4dl9

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

SUMMARY 1.) Trump confirmed the breakup and used the past tense to describe their relationship. • He said, “Elon and I had a great relationship. I don’t know if we will anymore,” signaling a clear end to their alliance. 2.) Trump accused Musk of being upset over losing billions in EV subsidies. • He claimed Musk’s criticism of the Big Beautiful Bill was financially motivated—not ideological. 3.) Musk immediately fired back on X and called Trump’s claims false. • He said he was never shown the bill, called Trump ungrateful, and defended the EV/solar incentives while blasting the “disgusting pork.” 4.) Trump revealed Musk tried to get Democrat Jared Isaacman nominated to lead NASA. 5.) Trump added he didn’t need Musk to win and would’ve taken Pennsylvania without him. • In response, Musk claimed that without his backing, Trump would have lost the election, and Democrats would control Congress. 6.) Trump took off the gloves and posted on Truth Social: • He said, “Elon was ‘wearing thin,’ I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!” 7.) That’s when Elon blew everything up. • He responded, “Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That’s the real reason they haven’t been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@realDonaldTrump This story is still unfolding. I’m tracking every update in real time. Bookmark this post and come back to it later. Also, share it with a friend who needs a quick catch-up. There’s no reversing what’s been said. Stay tuned—this story is just beginning. https://t.co/Rc4FkLlrmY

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Trump/Musk breakup is now official. For the first time, Trump spoke out after Musk blasted the Big Beautiful Bill. But here’s the twist—Musk was watching live and firing back in real time on X. What happened next was painful to watch. Trump said, “Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don’t know if we will anymore.” Then Trump posted on Truth Social—and that’s when the gloves really came off. 🧵 THREAD

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

UPDATE #1: At 4:09 PM Eastern, Elon Musk writes: “In light of the President’s statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.” This announcement followed President Trump’s earlier threat to terminate federal subsidies and contracts with Musk’s companies, including SpaceX and Tesla.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

UPDATE #2: Elon quote-tweets a post linking Trump to Jeffrey Epstein with a raised eyebrow emoji. The post claims Trump flew on Epstein’s plane at least 7 times, though there’s no proof he visited the island. It also highlights a 2002 New York Magazine quote where Trump described Epstein as “a terrific guy” who “likes beautiful women… on the younger side.” (See image for full quote)

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

UPDATE #3: Trump responds to Elon publicly attacking him, saying: “I don’t mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago. This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress. It’s a Record Cut in Expenses—$1.6 Trillion Dollars—and the Biggest Tax Cut ever given. If this Bill doesn’t pass, there will be a 68% Tax Increase, and things far worse than that. I didn’t create this mess—I’m just here to FIX IT. This puts our Country on a Path of Greatness. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@realDonaldTrump @SpaceX UPDATE #4: At 4:43 PM Eastern, Elon Musk drops another raised eyebrow emoji—this time on a post by @chesschick01 that reads: “In 1992 Trump partied with Jeffrey Epstein. Just gonna leave this here:” https://t.co/q0Kac0xjts https://t.co/cAXjfl5kHr

Video Transcript AI Summary
Footage from a 1992 Mar-a-Lago party shows Trump interacting with Jeffrey Epstein. The party, filmed before Mar-a-Lago became a club, featured cheerleaders and captured Trump's bachelor lifestyle for Faith Daniels' NBC talk show. The video shows Trump surrounded by women, then greeting Epstein and two others. Trump is seen talking to Epstein while women dance nearby. Trump alternates between dancing and pointing out women to Epstein, also mentioning the cameras. Trump gestures to one woman, saying to Epstein, "look at her back there. She's hot." He then whispers something that makes Epstein laugh.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of a Mar A Lago party shows Trump giving Epstein his personal attention. The footage shot in November of nineteen ninety two before Trump opened the resort as a club shows the future president surrounded by cheerleaders for the Buffalo Bills and Miami Dolphins, capturing Trump's fun loving bachelor lifestyle for an appearance on Faith Daniels' NBC talk show. We're gonna get great ratings in your show. Trump is surrounded by women as music blares in the background. After a while, Trump goes to greet three new guests. Among them, the financier Jeffrey Epstein. Come on in. Come inside. More than a decade before his guilty plea on state prostitution charges. Later in the footage, Trump is seen talking to Epstein and another man as women are dancing in front of them. Trump alternates between dancing and pointing out women to Epstein and the other man and telling Epstein about the cameras. Though exactly what they say is difficult to understand as they discuss the women and their appearances, Trump gestures to one and appears to say to Epstein, look at her back there. She's hot. And then Trump says something else into Epstein's ear that makes him double over with laughter. But as the president

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

🤨

@Chesschick01 - Natalie F Danelishen

In 1992 Trump partied with Jeffrey Epstein. Just gonna leave this here:

Video Transcript AI Summary
Footage from a 1992 Mar-a-Lago party shows Trump interacting with Jeffrey Epstein. The video, filmed before Mar-a-Lago became a club, features Trump surrounded by cheerleaders and was intended for Faith Daniels' NBC talk show. Trump greets Epstein and two others, then is seen talking to Epstein while women dance nearby. Trump alternates between dancing and pointing out women to Epstein, also mentioning the cameras. Trump gestures to one woman, saying to Epstein, "look at her back there. She's hot," and then whispers something that makes Epstein laugh.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of a Mar A Lago party shows Trump giving Epstein his personal attention. The footage, shot in November of nineteen ninety two before Trump opened the resort as a club, shows the future president surrounded by cheerleaders for the Buffalo Bills and Miami Dolphins, capturing Trump's fun loving bachelor lifestyle for an appearance on Faith Daniels' NBC talk show. I'm gonna get great ratings on your surrounded by women as music blares in the background. After a while, Trump goes to greet three new guests. Among them, the financier Jeffrey Epstein. Come on in. Georgia. More than a decade before his guilty plea on state prostitution charges. Later in the footage, Trump is seen talking to Epstein and another man as women are dancing in front of him. Trump alternates between dancing and pointing out women to Epstein and the other man and telling Epstein about the cameras. Though exactly what they say is difficult to understand as they discuss the women and their appearances, Trump gestures to one and appears to say to Epstein, look at her back there. She's hot. And then Trump says something else into Epstein's ear that makes him double over with laughter. But as the president

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@realDonaldTrump @SpaceX @Chesschick01 UPDATE #5: Elon Musk replies “Yes” to a post by @stillgray that reads: “President vs Elon. Who wins? My money’s on Elon. Trump should be impeached and JD Vance should replace him.” https://t.co/YGyBsiGoSo

View Full Interactive Feed