reSee.it - Related Post Feed

VigilantFox
Posted - April 1, 2023 at 2:26 AM
Saved - April 8, 2023 at 11:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
There are concerns that mRNA vaccines may be added to our food supply. Missouri HB 1169 is a labeling bill that seeks to counter this effort. If passed, it would require gene therapy products to be labeled as such. Lobbyists for cattle and pork associations have confirmed they will use mRNA vaccines in animals. Supporting HB 1169 is our only chance to prevent this. Learn more and vote YES.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Avoiding the Shot Isn't Enough: They Now Want to "Vaccinate" Us Through the Food Supply "Gates, the WHO, a ton of these universities: they're all talking about including mRNA vaccinations as part of the food. They're gonna modify the genes of these foods to make them mRNA vaccines," warned attorney @TomRenz. Missouri HB 1169 seeks to counter such an effort. It's been described as "one of the most controversial bills in history," but all it is – is a labeling bill. If a food product is a gene therapy product, you have every right to know. So, if this bill gets passed, it's a major victory not just for our well-being — but also for discovery, too.

Video Transcript AI Summary
This bill aims to ensure transparency and informed consent regarding gene therapy products and other medical interventions. It requires products potentially acting as gene therapy to be labeled accordingly, and information about potential exposure and shedding to be disclosed. The bill also emphasizes the importance of fully informed consent, including awareness of benefits, risks, and side effects. However, lobbyists, including those representing big pharma and agribusiness, are opposing the bill. The speaker urges support for the bill and criticizes those who oppose transparency and consumer knowledge. The bill's passage would reveal important information about adverse events and the use of gene therapy and mRNA vaccines in food.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This bill does 3 things, right? And I'm gonna read this. Okay? This is a quote from the bill. Any product that has been created to act as or expose to processes that could result in the product potentially acting as a gene therapy or that could otherwise possibly impact, alter or introduce genetic material or genetic change into the user of the product, individuals exposed to the product or individuals exposed to others who have used the product shall be conspicuously labeled with the words potential gene therapy product unless the product is known to be a gene therapy product, reasonable steps shall be taken to ensure the potential purchaser, the user of the product, is made aware of the presence of the label. If the product is known to be a gene therapy product the product shall be labeled conspicuously with the words gene therapy product. Okay. What does this mean? All this means folks is that if there's gene therapy products, you get to know about it. It's a it's a labeling bill. It doesn't do anything. We don't say you can't do it. We don't say there's an issue with it. We just say, hey, you got to make sure that consumers know if you're going to screw up their jeans. Sounds pretty simple, right? Pretty simple. Now I want you to remember that because I'm gonna come back to it in a second. I'm gonna tell you the other 2 parts of the bill. There's 2 other parts. I'm gonna read this to you because I don't want it to be misconstrued. The other side is lying about this bill, and I want you to hear it. And I want this bill sponsored in every state. You need to take this fill to your legislature in every republican state and ask them to sponsor it. We're gonna be talking about how and why. Okay. Part 2. Upon written request of any resident of this state, any entity that produces, sells, or distributes a product in this state with the capacity to infect an individual with a disease or to expose that individual to a genetically modified material, including but not limited to vaccines, gene therapies, drugs, and medical interventions, shall provide any and all information related to the ways in which individuals who did not directly obtain or use the product may be exposed to the product or component of the product. Right? What this means, and there's more, it goes on a little bit, but what it means is shedding has to be disclosed, and how shedding works has to be disclosed. And that makes sense because if it's a gene therapy product and it can spread, we have the right to know. I have the right to know if my genetics are being screwed with, don't I? Don't I? Okay. 3rd part. This is super important. Any entity that makes a product available in this state that could in fact transmit to or be absorbed in any individual in any way that would act as a medical intervention, vaccine, drug, or genetic modification shall obtain fully informed consent from all individuals who could be exposed to such product before exposure could occur. Fully informed consent requires, at a minimum, that an individual is made aware of all benefits and risks, including side effects of the product, any adverse events of special interest and any other reasonably possible impacts of the product. Alright folks. Informed consent. That's Nuremberg, right? The Republicans and the Democrats are selling out on this. Let me tell you who's good. Okay. Committee chair Bill Hardwick has been very good on this bill. Holly Jones, really good. You need to thank them. You need to call them. You need to support them. You need to back them, whatever you can do to tell them thank you for their courage because they're getting beat up. My understanding is there's a couple other members of the committee that are looking at backing this, but they've been told outright, don't vote on this. Don't have a vote on it. We're gonna shut it down. They've been told outright by Republicans, by lobbyists, by everyone. What they've done is big pharma bear Monsanto, which has a huge, huge presence in Missouri, went to the ag people, the ag lobbyists, and told the ag lobbyists that that part that says that you've got to call your foods, you know, gene therapy products, you know, you have to label everything. Well, first of all, if the what that means is so then these these lobbyists, they come in, they they say, yeah, we don't want to have to label everything as a gene therapy product. Well, wait a second. Are you tell that means that they're admitting that these GMO foods are affecting your genome. They should be labeled, folks. Why do you oppose it's just a label. Why do you oppose that? Why do you oppose the consumer knowing that there's a gene therapy potential in the product. Folks, Gates, The Who, a ton of these universities, they're all talking about including mRNA vaccinations as part of food. They're going to modify the genes of these foods to make them mRNA vaccines. Do you know that one of the committee members said that they don't care? They don't care. Apparently they didn't see the Died Suddenly movie folks. Apparently they don't care if you get to give informed consent on a medical intervention. Either that or they're too stupid to understand what's going on. Either way, this person should not be on the committee. I'm deciding whether to name names on that. Folks, let me tell you what's going on here. The lobbyists are telling the farmers that this is going to make the, you know, be a disaster for all their food. It's not. The only thing that this does is make sure that these guys can't put mRNA vaccine therapy into food and then give it to you or transmit it through other mechanisms without you knowing. That's all it does. If a product is a gene therapy product, you have every right to know, but they're trying to make sure that you don't. All this bill does is provide transparency. Are you telling me that Democrat, Republican, left, right, you don't think you have a right to know when a medical intervention is used on you, you don't have a right to know if they're gonna change your genetics. That's all this bill does, but the Republicans are selling out. The egg lobbyists are are throwing a conniption over this. Why folks? Why? Why would you have a conniption over this unless you planned on doing it? Why are these people do you know that privately, the the elected officials in Missouri are talking about this as one of the most controversial bills in history. They said privately, a number of them has said to me, oh, we've never seen the lobbyists so upset. Why do you think that is folks? Why do you think that is? These lobbyists have been told their butts on the line. If they get the if this bill keeps going, they're going to be fired. Folks, we, the people need this bill. What person in Missouri is going to oppose a transparency bill? What person in Missouri? Listen, let's say you're a hardcore leftist. Let's say you are die hard in support of these vaccines. Don't you think you should know before you've taken them? Do you oppose knowing before you've taken them? Are you okay with them integrating it into your food? Are you okay with that? I'm not. I'm not at all. I mean, this is insane, folks. And, these people, they're hiding it. I, they're, they're, they're just trying to cover this up. Folks, if this bill passes, then the truth about adverse events of special interests, the truth about informed consent, all this, all of this stuff comes out. Right?

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Learn more here: https://dailyclout.io/renz-missouri-house-testimony-biotech-admits-gates-gmo-factory-food-is-a-gene-therapy/

Renz Missouri House Testimony - BioTech Admits Gate's GMO Factory Food IS a Gene Therapy They now want to "vaccinate" us through the food supply. Here's how we can help put an end to it. dailyclout.io

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

I mistagged Tom. You can find him here: @RenzTom. Please give him a follow and thank him for leading the charge on this issue.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Full Video: https://rumble.com/v2foga8-tom-renz-missouri-and-mrna-food-supply-part-1.html

Tom Renz | Missouri and MRNA Food Supply (part 1) If you care about the #lies that #Fauci has put forward you care about Missouri House Bill No. 1169. It's the most straight forward, simple bill ever put forward, only 2 pages in length, and all it re rumble.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Vote YES in favor of HB 1169. Click on "introduced" under Bill Texts to read the bill. https://billcam.dailyclout.io/bills/CWDxclsTcy/g/hb-1169/creates-provisions-relating-to-required-disclosures-for-certain-products

HB-1169: Creates provisions relating to required disclosures for certain products BillCam: HB 1169 Creates provisions relating to required disclosures for certain products Creates provisions relating to required disclosures for certain products billcam.dailyclout.io

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

BREAKING NEWS: the lobbyists for the cattleman and pork associations in several states have CONFIRMED they WILL be using mRNA vaccines in pigs and cows THIS MONTH. WE MUST SUPPORT #Missouri #HB1169. It is LITERALLY the ONLY chance we have to prevent this… NO ONE knows the the… Show more https://t.co/dae08m7h13

VigilantFox
Posted - April 8, 2023 at 10:59 PM
Saved - April 8, 2023 at 11:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Attorney Tom Renz warns that mRNA vaccines could be surreptitiously inserted into the US food supply. Lobbyists for cattleman and pork associations confirm that they will use mRNA vaccines in pigs and cows. Missouri HB 1169 seeks to require labeling and disclosure of any product with gene therapy qualities, informed consent, and disclosure of adverse events. The bill is easy to pass and hard to oppose, but has become the most contentious bill in Missouri history. Transparency and disclosure are all that is being asked for.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Surreptitious Insertion of mRNA Could Be in the U.S. Food Supply RIGHT NOW "What's happened is, we found out that they're actually already doing this [inserting mRNA in food] in some countries. And because Congress decided to remove the country of origin labels from food products, if they're doing this in China, it's potentially in our food supply," stated Attorney @RenzTom. "We don't know where our food is coming from, but we know that they're able to do it and probably are doing it now in China. They're going to be doing it in the immediate future if they're not already doing it here in the United States. And that's just in meat; we don't know about in vegetables."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Hospital 1169 requires disclosure of gene therapy qualities in products, discusses transmission of gene therapy aspects, and mandates informed consent. However, there is opposition to the bill, particularly from big pharma and agricultural lobbyists. Research reveals that vaccines may be integrated into foods, with a product called Seqevity already on the market. This technology could potentially transmit mRNA gene therapies from animals to humans. Concerns arise due to the removal of country of origin labels on food products, making it uncertain if this practice is already happening in the United States. Opposition to the bill comes from companies like Bayer Monsanto, who are incorporating gene therapy into seeds and livestock. The fight against informed consent is puzzling.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hospital 11 69 does 3 things. And I'm I'm getting your answer here, but it essentially requires that you disclose if any product has a gene therapy quality. It requires that you talk about how those gene therapy, aspects of the product could be transmitted to other people. And then it requires in full a full informed consent before someone gives you a medical intervention or a gene therapy. So 3 things that are completely non controversial and there's no problem. Well, we go and we're working on this bill and we're getting massive opposition to informed consent. We're saying, who the heck would oppose this? Well, it turns out that big pharma, through the ag lobbyists, were opposing this massively. And the reason that they're doing it is because, just I started doing this research. And going back to 2000, I've actually found documents going back to the mid nineties where they've talked about integrating vaccines into foods. Initially, this was done Speaker 1: Hey, Thomas. One one second. Just I just wanna clarify something. So you're saying that they're currently doing this, Or is this bill to just prevent it from happening in the future? Speaker 0: Well, that's the thing that was shocking to me is initially, I thought this was to prevent it. But we got word from the pork and cattle some lobbyists who I can't talk about names because these guys would get wire in a heartbeat that they were planning on using mRNA gene therapies, like in the immediate future. Speaker 1: Well, so I started doing some research and it turns out just there is a product called Seqevity Speaker 0: on the market from Merck that I'm I'm looking right here. It says, Seqevity harnesses IMR or RNA particle technology to create customized prescription vaccines, in swine. It's there. Not only is it there, but it appears that the technology is getting to the point where they can be transmissible from these animals to people. Just we have I also have and Peter McCullough confirmed this for me. He's looked at this. And he actually tweeted, and I'm just gonna read his tweet. He says, Chinese successfully reloaded cow's milk with mRNA, and it was absorbed into the GI tract of recipients. Concerns about surreptitious insertion of mRNA into the food are valid, must be stopped. Just what's happened is is we found out that they're actually already doing this in some countries. And because Congress decided to remove the country of origin labels from food products. If they're doing this in China, it's potentially in our food supply. We don't know where our food's coming from, but we know that they're able to do it and probably are doing it now in China. They're going to be doing it in the immediate future if they're not already doing it here in the United States. And, we that's just in meats. We don't know about in vegetables. Speaker 1: So we just got about a minute before we go to break. But if you could just walk through real quick who you said the largest just of opposition to this bill are, because maybe we can kinda reverse engineer out of that what the real issue is. Like I said, about 30 seconds. Speaker 0: Just Bayer Monsanto is located in Saint Louis and they're driving a lot of this. Bayer bought Monsanto, the largest seed producer on the planet, and they're engineering this into the seed, and, you know, maybe into the cattle and into other things. But big pharma is essentially using the lobbyists. Cattlemen associations fighting it hard. Farm bureaus, just a lot of the chambers of commerce says they're fighting this, because they don't want informed consent. I it's which is beyond me.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

If you don't want gene therapy surreptitiously inserted into your food, please share this information far and wide to spread awareness. To learn more about what you can do and Missouri HB 1169, please follow the link below: https://dailyclout.io/eat-your-vaccines-mrna-gene-therapy-is-coming-to-the-food-supply-this-month/

Eat Your Vaccines: mRNA Gene Therapy Is Coming to the Food Supply THIS MONTH They've given up on a needle in every arm. Now they're coming for what you eat. dailyclout.io

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

“Lobbyists for the cattleman and pork associations in several states have CONFIRMED they WILL be using mRNA vaccines in pigs and cows THIS MONTH,” warned attorney @RenzTom. mRNA food is coming — and it's coming fast.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

“Gates, the WHO, a ton of these universities: they’re all talking about including mRNA vaccinations as part of the food. They’re going to modify the genes of these foods to make them mRNA vaccines,” he warned in this video.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

But Missouri HB 1169 seeks to counter such practices. It’s been described as “one of the most controversial bills in history,” but all it is – is a labeling bill. It doesn’t ban anything. You have every right to know if a food product is a gene therapy product.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

So, if this bill gets passed, it’s a major victory for informed consent and, in all likelihood, our well-being. The entire two-page bill is available to read on DailyClout (https://billcam.dailyclout.io/bill-texts/uNWj5bOW6b). Here’s an excerpt:

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

"Any product that has been created to act as, or exposed to processes that could result in the product potentially acting as, a gene therapy or that could otherwise possibly impact, alter, or introduce genetic material or a genetic change into the user of the product, individuals exposed to the product, or individuals exposed to others who have used the product shall be conspicuously labeled with the words "Potential Gene Therapy Product" unless the product is known to be a gene therapy product. "Reasonable steps shall be taken to ensure the potential purchaser or user of the product is made aware of the presence of this label. If a product is known to be a gene therapy product, the product shall be conspicuously labeled with the words "Gene Therapy Product". The provisions of this section shall be liberally construed in favor of disclosure of any potential gene therapy product."

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The bill was written in a way “to be as easy to pass and as hard to oppose as possible,” conveyed attorney Renz. Missouri HB 1169 does three things:

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1.) “It requires labeling and disclosure of any product that has any gene therapy qualities.”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

2.) “It requires that if you have a product on the market that has gene therapy qualities, that anyone can call the company and say, ‘hey, how does this spread? ‘Does it shed? ... Or is there a way that this can spread?’ And they have to disclose it.”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

3.) “It requires informed consent. And informed consent includes serious events or adverse events of special interest. … And it requires informed consent before you be given anything with the gene therapy or medicinal property.”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

“So, this isn’t difficult,” stressed attorney Renz. “I don’t think this is a Democrat bill or Republican bill. It’s sponsored by a Republican (Rep. Holly Jones) but should be universally supported.”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

However, “[t]his has become the most contentious bill in Missouri history,” he lamented. “All we’re asking for is transparency and disclosure.”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Now, pharma can’t come out and oppose transparency and disclosure. So they would need the agricultural community to have their back. Remember, Bill Gates and the CCP are the two largest holders of agriculture in America.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

“So these guys [Gates & CCP] throw money at these guys [agricultural associations] — buy off these guys. They’re not representing the local farmers,” attested attorney @RenzTom.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

But here’s the reason this bill is so important. If attorney Tom Renz helps pass Missouri HB 1169, “those disclosures and the ability to get that information (is gene therapy in my food?) apply globally.” he explained.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

“So if we can win in one state, the truth in Missouri is the truth in Iowa. So we’ve got to get everybody on the planet calling these guys, telling them you got to pass this — you got to stand for we the people. All it is – is transparency and disclosure," he said.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

"We don’t even ban it. They can still make their poison foods. I just need to know if I’m eating them," @RenzTom expressed.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

So, whether you’re in Missouri, Iowa, the United Kingdom, or Australia, you need to help push HB 1169 across the finish line. Because as @RenzTom said, if the bill passes in Iowa, “those disclosures and the ability to get that information apply globally.”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

So, share this bill (https://billcam.dailyclout.io/bills/CWDxclsTcy/g/hb-1169/creates-provisions-relating-to-required-disclosures-for-certain-products) on social media, call your local legislators — ask your representatives why a bill similar to HB 1169 is not being discussed in your neck of the woods. https://billcam.dailyclout.io/bills/CWDxclsTcy/g/hb-1169/creates-provisions-relating-to-required-disclosures-for-certain-products)

HB-1169: Creates provisions relating to required disclosures for certain products BillCam: HB 1169 Creates provisions relating to required disclosures for certain products Creates provisions relating to required disclosures for certain products billcam.dailyclout.io

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

They’ve already given up on a needle in every arm. Make them do the same when it comes to inserting gene therapy into your food.

FredDiBiase247
Posted - December 24, 2023 at 12:28 AM
Saved - December 24, 2023 at 2:32 AM

@FredDiBiase247 - 𝗙𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗗𝗶𝗕𝗶𝗮𝘀𝗲 ①

Where is your beef really coming from? Must Watch👇🏽👇🏽 https://t.co/HXHLvVikN3

Video Transcript AI Summary
Over 85% of grass-fed beef in the American market is imported, not raised in the USA. It's surprising that this imported beef can legally be labeled as a product of the USA if value is added here. We compete with it every day. The value is added through grinding, slicing, cutting, packaging, labeling, reboxing, and transportation. However, it's important to note that the animal itself is born, raised, and slaughtered in countries like Uruguay, Australia, New Zealand, and 20 others.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Over 85% of the grass fed beef in, you know, the American market is imported product, not raised in America. Mhmm. Ain't that nuts? Speaker 1: The worst part is that imported beef is legally labeled product of USA. How's that? If value is added in this country, it's a product of the USA. What? We we compete with we compete with it every day. How do they add value? If you if they grind it, slice it, Cut it, package it, label it Rebox it. Transport it. But the animal make make no mistake. The animal was born, raised, and slaughtered in Uruguay, Australia, New Zealand, or or 20 other countries.
WallStreetApes
Posted - January 7, 2024 at 3:31 PM
Saved - January 7, 2024 at 4:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Texas rancher Shad Sullivan warns of a planned food shortage and depopulation facilitated by the US government. State officials are euthanizing animals, plowing crops, and dumping milk. Sullivan urges producers and consumers to take action and calls for food to be stocked on shelves. The importation of beef from Namibia contradicts the push to euthanize harvest-ready cattle. The food supply is in trouble, and everyone should be concerned.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Texas American Rancher Says US Government Facilitating Plans For A Planned Food Shortage & Depopulation 🚨 Says Due To State Officials “Harvest Ready Cows Are Being Euthanized, Dumping Out Hundreds Of Thousands Of Gallons Of Milk, Plowing Vegetable Crops From Coast To Coast, Euthanizing Millions Of Chickens, Aborting Sows & Feeder Pigs, Preparing Us To Depopulate” “Hey, everybody. This is Shad Sullivan coming to you from the headwaters of Bitter Creek, Archer County, North Texas. We have to talk. State officials will be assisting to help identify potential alternative markets if a producer is unable to move animals and if necessary, advise and assist on depopulation and disposal methods. Ladies and gentlemen, we are plowing under vegetable crops from coast to coast. We are euthanizing millions of chickens. We are aborting sows and burying feeder pigs. We are dumping milk by the hundreds of thousands of gallons, and now they are preparing us to depopulate the fat cattle ready to harvest. — Our food supply is in trouble, and I am appealing to producers and consumers across the nation to start calling. Yesterday, the 1st shipment of imported beef from The country of Namibia hit the shores of the United States of America. And yet this morning, they are telling us to prepare to euthanize harvest ready cattle. — It is time we get food on the shelves. Because if you're not concerned about this food supply problem, you better be.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Shad Sullivan, speaking from Bitter Creek in North Texas, addresses the current crisis in the food supply chain caused by the effects of COVID-19. He highlights the need for state officials to assist in finding alternative markets for producers who are unable to move their animals. Sullivan expresses concern over the euthanization of animals, plowing under vegetable crops, and dumping milk due to bottlenecks in the system. He questions the importation of beef from Namibia while American cattle are being prepared for euthanasia. Sullivan calls for the American people to return to work, money to flow, and food to be readily available on shelves.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, everybody. This is Shad Sullivan coming to you from the headwaters of Bitter Creek, Archer County, North Texas. We have to talk. State officials will be assisting to help identify potential alternative markets if a producer is unable to move animals And if necessary, advise and assist on depopulation and disposal methods. Ladies and gentlemen, we are plowing under vegetable crops from coast to coast. We are euthanizing millions of chickens. We are aborting sows and burying feeder pigs. We are dumping milk by the hundreds of thousands of gallons and now they are preparing us to depopulate The fat cattle ready to harvest because of a bottleneck created by the effects of COVID. This thing hasn't been created by COVID, but the effects of COVID and the logistics therein, we are in trouble. Our food supply is in trouble, and I am appealing to producers and consumers across the nation to start calling. Yesterday, the 1st shipment of imported beef from the country of Namibia hit the shores of the United States of America. And yet this morning, they are Telling us to prepare to euthanize harvest ready cattle. Am I the only one that sees a problem in this? It is time we get the American people back to work. It is time we get money flowing. It is time we get food on the shelves. Because if you're not concerned about this food supply problem, you better
WallStreetApes
Posted - February 2, 2024 at 2:19 AM
Saved - February 2, 2024 at 3:33 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A proposed bill for mandatory electronic identification ear tags is causing concern among small farmers. They believe it will burden them with additional costs and infrastructure, ultimately leading to the shutdown of family farms. They see this bill as a way for the government and big corporations to gain control over their businesses. They urge people to oppose the bill and reach out to their congressmen and cattlemen's associations to voice their opposition.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

🚨 NEW Legislation Proposed That This American Farmer Says Will Eventually Shut Down & Put ALL Family Farms Out Of Business The Mandatory Electronic Identification Ear Tag Bill Would Allow Government & Environmental Groups Who Attribute Livestock To Climate Change To Receive Information On Small Farms Cattle “Smaller operations will struggle to shoulder the cost and infrastructure to maintain these systems” “So the big thing now is the big controversy on in the pharma community — The Eectronic Ear Tag, The Mandatory Electronic Ear Tag Bill that's out there. And I'm a little bit offended to see some small time farmers who actually supporting this. It's offended is not the right word. Baffled is a better word. Never let government controls way too much of our food supply already, and this is like any bill put through legislation. It's masked with good intentions. But what it really is is a Trojan horse to get in and control the small farmer. That's all it is. It it's meant to come in, put the small farmer out of business. If you ever are confused about a bill, always say no. If if governments want more control, it should always be no. But in this, if you're ever confused about, like, the true motivations behind the bill, look who's supporting it. Who supports this? Big politicians and big gov and big, uh, corporation corporate farmers corporate ranchers. You know? Get, um, they support it because what it's gonna do, it's gonna allow them to put a lockdown on us, put us out of business. Don't let government tell you how to run your business. Don't invite them into it. And because of the pushback, they're trying to make some of the language say, uh, voluntary. But even that is just the way to get their hooks in. It's just the way to seek it in, to normalize it, and then in a few years, to make it mandatory. That's how government always works. Don't let them do this. Don't fall for this. Call your congress Thomas Massie is really good on this, the Kentucky congressman. The call your congressman. Call your legislator. Do whatever you can. Tell them no. No way. Call your cattlemen's associations. If they if they stand behind this, bulk.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses concern over the mandatory electronic ear tag bill in the pharma community and on TikTok. They are puzzled by small-time farmers who support it, believing that it is a Trojan horse to control and put small farmers out of business. They advise always saying no to bills that increase government control and urge listeners to look at who supports the bill to understand its true motivations. The speaker warns against allowing government interference in running businesses and predicts that even if the bill starts as voluntary, it will eventually become mandatory. They encourage contacting representatives and cattlemen's associations to oppose the bill.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the the big thing now is the big controversy on in the pharma community and on TikTok is the, the electronic ear tag the mandatory electronic ear tag bill that's out there. And I'm a little bit offended to see some small time farmers who, actually supporting this. It's offended is not the right word. Baffled is a better word. Never let government controls way too much of our food supply already. And this is like, any bill put through legislation. It's masked with good intentions, but what it really is is a Trojan horse to get in and control the small farmer. That's all it is. It it's meant to come in, put the small farmer out of business. If you ever are confused about a bill, always say no. If if governments want more control, it should always be no. But in this, if you're ever confused about, like, the true motivations behind the bill, look who's supporting it. Who supports this? Big politicians and big gov and big, corporation corporate farmers, corporate ranchers. You know, get, they support it because what it's gonna do, it's gonna allow them to put a lockdown on us, put us out of business. Don't let government tell you how to run your business. Don't invite them into it. And because of the pushback, they're trying to make some of the language say, voluntary. But even that is just a way to get their hooks in. It's just a way to seek it in, to normalize it, and then in a few years to make it mandatory. That's how government always works. Don't let them do this. Don't fall for this. Call your con Thomas Massie is really good on this, the Kentucky congressman. But call your congressman. Call your legislator. Do whatever you can. Tell them no. No way. Call your Cattlemen's Associations. If they if they stand behind this, bulk.
AwakenedOutlaw
Posted - March 2, 2024 at 9:04 PM
Saved - March 3, 2024 at 4:21 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The first post discusses the need for legislation to prohibit the serving of human flesh without the recipient's knowledge. It mentions that this reality will anger and disgust people who have eaten at the establishments involved. The second post warns readers to prepare themselves, while the third post provides a source for more information.

@AwakenedOutlaw - AwakenedOutlaw⚒️

👀 Seems pertinent. Now stop for a moment and consider WHY this even has to be floated legislatively. The unfortunate reality behind this, along with the brands/restaurants involved, will both piss people off AND make them sick to their stomach thinking of all the times they've eaten at the establishments involved. 😬

@gemstatebrian - Brian Almon

Rep. Heather Scott presents H522, prohibiting the serving of human flesh to unknowing recipients. #idpol #idleg https://t.co/XWM61mdZhN

@AwakenedOutlaw - AwakenedOutlaw⚒️

Brace yourselves. #LongPig https://t.co/kwLW0YJ6x2

@AwakenedOutlaw - AwakenedOutlaw⚒️

Sauce: https://legislature.idaho.gov/sessioninfo/billbookmark/?yr=2024&bn=H0522 h/t @MagicalMom73 https://t.co/Sgq9gcc3Q2

WallStreetApes
Posted - March 25, 2024 at 11:25 AM
Saved - March 25, 2024 at 12:02 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The mandatory electronic ear tag bill for cattle is causing concern among American farmers and Rep Thomas Massie. They believe it could lead to the banning of cattle and the end of independent producers. The bill would allow government and environmental groups to access information on small farms' cattle, increasing costs and potentially giving control to big corporations. The tracking of cattle is seen as a threat to private property rights and could lead to further regulations in the name of climate change. Lobbyists received $15 million to implement this tagging system, which is not authorized by any law.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

I’ve Been Blowing The Whistle On This For Months, The Electronic Ear Tag For Cattle Bill VERY IMPORTANT 🚨 Not only do American farmers say this could put ALL small family farms out of business but Rep Thomas Massie says this is the first step to BANNING cattle - “The key that opens the door to end to the end of independent producers across the country” - The mandatory electronic identification ear tag bill would allow government & environmental groups who attribute livestock to climate change to receive information on small farms cattle - Smaller operations will struggle to shoulder the cost and infrastructure to maintain these systems - Said by farmers I’ve shared “A Trojan horse to get in and control the small farmer. It’s meant to come in, put the small farmer out of business - The rule would increase marketing costs because whenever an animal is sold, it would have to be traced and recorded “Well, you know, the left wants to ban cattle. And before you can ban anything, you need a registry. You need to know where it's at and who owns it, and that's why they want to tag cattle. We've seen it happen in Europe. Now on the right, you've got some cronies who stand to make some money from these ear tags. They're the ones who get the $15,000,000, uh, earmark. It doesn't go to USDA. It's going to, quote, stakeholders. That is a code word for private entities are getting a handout. And, um, what they'll do, they'll verticalize the industry with this. The big corporations, you know, you just talked about China. There are 4 corporations control meat processing in United States. One's owned by China. One's owned Brazil by Brazil. American ranchers will be working for those organizations if this tracking goes through because they'll verticalize the industry. —What's your response to this tracking of cattle? Are you concerned as well? Oh, yes. I am. It is, the key that opens the door to end to the end of independent producers across the country, and it is a pro a private property rights issue that, uh, we really have to consider here. When we start talking about RFID, EID, and data monitor monitoring of farmers and ranchers and their cattle herd size, we open up to what the door to what is going on in the European Union. And, under the rules of sustainable development, we know that the RFID, has led to a land seizure in the name of climate change. So once we open that door, there's no going back. And, uh, they can come and they can monitor, measure, report, and verify everything that's going on your on your farm or ranch. And then it's maybe down the road in the name of climate change, they can come and, uh, uh, dictate to you the rules of their production, which are subjective on a from a third party verification, and it is extremely dangerous to private property rights. This is a liberty taker, not a liberty maker.” Congressman Thomas Massie posted on “Hidden in this week’s Omnibus: Lobbyists got $15 million dollars to implement ELECTRONIC TAGGING of all cattle in the US. No law authorizes this! It will be used by the GREEN agenda to limit beef production, and by the corporate meat oligopoly to DOMINATE small ranchers. Massie, who sponsored the PRIME Act (which would allow meat from custom exempt slaughter plants to be marketed in some instances) shared the language, apparently directly from the omnibus bill: “The agreement directs the Department to continue to provide the tags and related infrastructure needed to comply with the Federal Animal Disease Traceability rule (9 CFR 86), including no less than $15,000,000 for electronic identification (EID) tags and related infrastructure needed for stakeholders to comply with the proposed rule. “Use of Electronic identification Eartags as Official Identification in Cattle and Bison.” (88 FR 3320), should that rule be finalized.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The left wants to tag cattle for a potential ban, while the right sees it as a money-making opportunity. Concerns about private entities benefiting and industry verticalization arise. The tracking of cattle is viewed as a threat to independent producers and private property rights, drawing parallels to European practices and potential land seizures under the guise of climate change. This monitoring could lead to third-party control over production, posing a danger to liberty.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, you know, the left wants to ban cattle. And before you can ban anything, you need a registry. You need to know where it's at and who owns it, and that's why they want to tag cattle. We've seen it happen in Europe. Now on the right, you've got some cronies who stand to make some money from these ear tags. They're the ones who get the $15,000,000, earmark. It doesn't go to USDA. It's going to quote stakeholders. That is a code word for private entities are getting a handout. And, what they'll do, they'll verticalize the industry with this. The big corporations, you know, you just talked about China. There are 4 corporations control meat processing in United States. One's owned by China, one's owned Brazil by Brazil. American ranchers will be working for those organizations if this tracking goes through because they'll verticalize the industry. Shadi, what's your response to this tracking of cattle? Are you concerned as well? Speaker 1: Oh, yes. I am. It is, the key that opens the door to end to the end of independent producers across the country. And it is a private property rights issue that, we really have to consider here. When we start talking about RFID, EID and data monitoring of farmers and ranchers and their cattle herd size, we open up to what the door to what is going on in the European Union. And under the rules of sustainable sustainable development, we know that the RFID, has led to a land seizure in the name of climate change. So once we open that door, there's no going back. And, they can come and they can monitor, climate change, they can come and, dictate to you the climate change, they can come and, dictate to you the rules of their production, which is subjective on a from a third party verification, and it is extremely dangerous to private property rights. This is a liberty taker, not a liberty maker.
Tweetadee1926
Posted - August 11, 2024 at 2:31 AM
Saved - August 11, 2024 at 2:26 PM

@Tweetadee1926 - HelsOnWheels

TO ALL CANADIANS & SHARE If you recall, Health Canada has decided NOT to tell Canadians if they’re eating “Clone Meat” or not! They will NOT label the meat or products made with the clone meat. This was their reply from my email to them https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/programs/consulation-food-derived-somatic-cell-nuclear-transfer-clones-offspring-policy-update/scientific-opinion.html @FoodProfessor https://t.co/MzIY3owf2Q

myhiddenvalue
Posted - October 28, 2024 at 7:56 AM
Saved - October 29, 2024 at 12:24 AM

@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number

Do they allow human meet in the food supply in your state? https://t.co/ul9cqKafSW

Video Transcript AI Summary
RS 31078 addresses concerns about cannibalism and human composting. In 2019, I learned about Washington state's human composting initiative, which disturbed me due to the potential for human bone fragments in compost. My goal is to prevent this from entering the food supply. During a food show, contestants were told that cannibalism is illegal in Idaho, but it’s not illegal to unknowingly serve human remains to others. This bill aims to close that loophole. I propose including language about flesh, blood, bones, and organs to ensure comprehensive coverage. My hope is to address this issue incrementally, starting with this legislation and potentially expanding it in the future.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: RS 31078, cannibalism. Might seem kind of gruesome and it kinda is. I'm gonna give you a little background of what got me to this position to run this bill. Back in 2019, I heard that Washington state was starting to to do human composting And that disturbed me. I wanted to address this because what I didn't want to see is bags of compost with human bone fragments. I want to stop it getting into the human food supply. I was on a plane this summer, watched a video of some food show and the 3 contestants tasted the food and they had to guess what was in it. It was some kind of a sausage. And one of the options they told these people that was in the food was it is illegal. Cannibalism is illegal, and that is Idaho. It is illegal. Cannibalism is illegal, and that is Idaho. Already illegal for someone to do it themselves, but it is not illegal for them to give it to somebody unknowingly. So what that language does is captures, it getting into the food sources. That that's really my concern. Would you want to sources. That that's really my concern. Would you want to include, on line 11, flesh, blood, bones, and organs? I do believe flesh would would cover the organs. Hopefully, we don't ever have to add the bones to this. But I was doing that incrementalism thing. I mean, if it's not even illegal to feed it to someone. So I was thinking like maybe next year, we come back and go the next step.
WallStreetApes
Posted - November 3, 2024 at 1:38 PM
Saved - November 3, 2024 at 4:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I want to highlight a critical issue: Democrats recently voted against a bill that would have mandated clear labeling for meat products containing mRNA vaccines. Currently, mRNA vaccines are being used in various species, including shrimp and pork, but we lack data on the extent of this practice. Some companies are customizing vaccines for farms without proper testing or research. This situation poses significant risks, and with the bill's rejection, I fear similar actions could happen in Canada next. This is a dangerous trend that needs attention.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 🚨 Democrats VOTED DOWN a bill that would have forced all meat products to clearly be label if injected mRNA vaccines “mRNA vaccines are entering our food chain in several species. So currently all farmed shrimp are being vaccinated with mRNA. Currently pork is an unknown amount is being vaccinated with mRNA.” “Some of the companies state on their advertising, we put the right gene in your livestock vaccine. So they have vaccines going into the swine industry. We don't have data on how much of it's being sold and where and who are the buyers.” “a customized vaccines where they go on to a farm, they take samples of the of the diseases on the farm, then go into the lab and a few days later they produce an mRNA vaccine for your customized to your farm's diseases. There's no testing, no research, nothing.” - John Graff, a nutritionist, chemist, process engineer, agribusiness executive, and a board director of the National Citizen’s Inquiry Speaking of impact taking place in Canada right now. Know Democrats shut down the bill requiring labeling here in America, so we are next. This is extremely, extremely dangerous.

Video Transcript AI Summary
mRNA vaccines are being introduced into the food chain, particularly in farmed shrimp and swine. Merck, known for ivermectin, has remained quiet about its financial losses during COVID, possibly due to its ownership of several mRNA companies. These companies advertise customized vaccines for livestock, created by sampling diseases on farms and producing tailored mRNA vaccines in a matter of days. However, there is a lack of data on the extent of these vaccines' use and no thorough testing or research on the specific antigens involved. The understanding of mRNA technology is general, but detailed knowledge about each antigen is absent.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: MRNA vaccines are entering our food chain in several species. So currently, all farmed shrimp are being vaccinated with mRNA. Currently, Hork is an unknown amount is being vaccinated with mRNA. It's Merck, who we know as the, one of the originators of ivermectin, and you wonder why they didn't make a big fuss at the amount of money they lost during COVID because of the the inability to sell ivermectin into the whole thing. They could have been a a kingpin in this and they were silent. Why is because they own a lot of mRNA companies. Some of the companies state on their advertising, we put the right gene in your livestock vaccine. So they have vaccines going into the swine industry. We don't have data on how much of it's being sold and where and who are the buyers. So it's all speculative on the volume, but the technology is rather interesting. It's a customized vaccines where they go onto a farm. They take samples of the of the diseases on the farm, then go into the lab and a few days later, they produce an mRNA vaccine for your customized to your farm's diseases. There's no testing, no research, nothing. They have a general, understanding of the mRNA aspect of it on a general standpoint. But for each of these antigens, there is no understanding.
HawleyMO
Posted - December 20, 2024 at 7:53 PM
Saved - December 20, 2024 at 8:48 PM

@HawleyMO - Josh Hawley

After shutting down Missouri plants and taking Missouri jobs, now Tyson Food is trying to silence Missouri farmers and stop them from getting accountability. How about Tyson tells the world instead why it’s using slave child labor in its supply chains https://t.co/pJZqqud1QI

realLisaDaly
Posted - January 24, 2025 at 9:04 PM
Saved - January 25, 2025 at 6:36 PM

@realLisaDaly - realLisaDaly

@7SEES_ @_whitneywebb Forgot about this. Bananas are genetically modified to be used as a vax, too. TN's legislation ensures it can't be fed to us without conspicuous labeling. https://t.co/O1m1Rzl8cK

WallStreetApes
Posted - January 25, 2025 at 1:41 AM
Saved - January 25, 2025 at 2:03 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
As a restaurant owner for a decade, I've uncovered a troubling scam involving US beef companies. They exploit a loophole in North Carolina laws, allowing them to label cattle as "natural grass-fed" after just six weeks of grass feeding. These cattle are often sourced from overcrowded, unsanitary conditions in New Mexico, where they consume unhealthy diets filled with antibiotics. After being bought cheaply, they're briefly placed on grass to meet certification requirements. The truth about where our beef really comes from is both shocking and disturbing.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

American Restaurant Owner of 10 years exposes a shady scam by US beef companies American beef businesses are using a loophole to lie to consumers about “Natural grass fed beef” “There's a loophole in the laws in North Carolina, probably most states to get certified organic grass fed cow, it has to eat grass for 6 weeks. So what they do is they buy cattle from like New Mexico, from desert food lots where they're - Standing 2 feet deep in their own sh*t - They're eating like corn powder with f*cking antibiotics and all kinds of sh*t in it. Super unnatural - They're packed in like sardines. They buy those cow at auction super cheap, skinny ass cows, and then they transport 'em in whatever state they stick 'em on grass in a barn with hay for six weeks. And technically it's a local certified organic grass fed cattle that will blow your motherfucking mind process, that all your organics and all that's all bullsh*t” “You’ll be shocked where your beef comes from.” He tells a story about how he got this inside information and how many places are actually doing this, it’s shocking and disgusting

Video Transcript AI Summary
I started a restaurant with just $30 and food stamps, sourcing everything locally in North Carolina. Many believe in the quality of organic, grass-fed beef, but much of it is misleading. I learned from the owner of a prominent company that they buy cattle from poor conditions in New Mexico, then feed them grass for just six weeks to label them as organic. It took me three years to find a legitimate local farm for my restaurant's beef. I finally discovered Apple Brandy Farms, a family-owned operation in North Carolina with the best, most flavorful beef I've ever had. If you're in the area, I highly recommend them.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm a tell you a little story. Cattle, beef, food. A lot of people don't know anything about where it comes from. So I owned a restaurant for 10 years. Miraculous. I know. I started it with $30 in the bank and a month's worth of food stamps. I don't recommend that business model just for all you entrepreneurs. When it comes to your beef, grass fed, organic, 99% of it is bullshit. At my restaurant, sourced everything locally in North Carolina. The biggest organic grass fed supposedly, like, best company in Asheville is called Hickory Nut Gap. I went to a party that we catered for one of my cheese purveyors, local goat cheese. Great times. We cooked, like, 300 ears of corn, and we were all on mushroom. I never bought the hickory nut Gap meat because it was 10 times the cost of any other beef. I ran into the owner of this company. He was drunk. There are farms way up in the mountains, and I've driven by it many times. And there was never any animals out out there, a couple of goats. I asked him, hey, man. Where do y'all keep the cows? Well, we don't have any cow. How do you sell all this meat? He said, there's a loophole in the laws in North Carolina, probably most states, to get certified organic grass fed cow. It has to eat grass for 6 weeks. So what they do is they buy cattle from, like, New Mexico, from desert food lots where they're standing 2 feet deep in their own shit. They're eating, like, corn powder with fucking antibiotics and all kinds of shit in it. Super unnatural. They're packed in like sardines, dude. I've seen those kind of farms. It's nuts. They buy those cow at auction, super cheap, skinny ass cows, and then they transport them in whatever state. They stick them on grass in a barn with hay for 6 weeks, and, technically, it's a local certified organic grass fed cattle. That will blow your motherfucking mind. Process that. All your organics and all that's all bullshit. Took me, like, 3 years to find a legit local farm for my beef at my restaurant. It's a family owned operation for over a 100 years in North Carolina. The best beef I have ever had, most tender, most flavorful beef. Even the tough cuts like sirloins and the flank the, skirt steaks are usually like rubber. They're straight up butter. The owner is a fabulous guy. He would pull up in his refrigerated truck and bring us pigs, all our cuts. A great company. If you're in North Carolina, look them up. Apple Brandy Farms. Took me years to find that farm that was legit in Asheville, North Carolina. Everybody thinks they're it's all local and organic.
RINOhunter1776
Posted - February 11, 2025 at 4:15 PM
Saved - February 11, 2025 at 5:07 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Missouri has been importing meat from over 20 countries and labeling it as American-made, despite a state law requiring country-of-origin labeling. This law, RSMo 265.286, is not being enforced because officials claim federal law preempts it, which is untrue. Instead of enforcing the law, lawmakers are proposing weak resolutions to Congress. This situation benefits foreign meat producers and large corporations while harming independent Missouri cattlemen and consumers who are unaware of the true origin of their meat. I urge everyone to contact legislators and demand enforcement of the existing law.

@RINOhunter1776 - Missouri RINO Watch

🚨 Missouri Is Letting Foreign Meat Be Labeled as "American"—Even Though State Law Bans It! 🚨 Did you know? Since 2014, Missouri has been importing meat from over 20 countries—and then labeling it as American-made. 🤯 ❌ The worst part? Missouri already has a law (RSMo 265.286) requiring country-of-origin labeling! ❌ It passed both chambers, was signed by the governor, and is state law. ❌ But it’s NOT being enforced—because state officials are too spineless to uphold it. Why Won’t Missouri Enforce Its Own Law? 👉 Bureaucrats claim federal law preempts Missouri’s labeling rule—but that’s a lie. There is NO federal regulation that bans country-of-origin labeling. Missouri could enforce this today! 👉 Instead, our lawmakers are pushing SCR 7 & SCR 5—weak resolutions that simply beg Congress to reinstate federal labeling laws… when we could enforce our own RIGHT NOW. Who Benefits? 💰 Foreign meat producers—who get to sell imported meat as “American” at full price. 💰 Big meatpacking corporations—who are squeezing out independent Missouri cattlemen. Who Loses? 🚜 Missouri’s independent cattlemen—forced to compete with foreign meat priced the same as their homegrown beef. 🍽️ Missouri consumers—who have NO IDEA where their meat actually comes from. 💥 Missouri has the law—so why won’t they enforce it? Why are they passing meaningless resolutions instead of protecting our farmers and consumers? 🔥 Call your legislators and demand they ENFORCE RSMo 265.286 NOW! 🔥 💬 Do you think Missouri should enforce its own law or keep letting foreign meat be labeled as “American”? Drop your thoughts below! 👇

SenseReceptor
Posted - February 27, 2025 at 12:28 AM
Saved - March 2, 2025 at 12:20 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the only way to halt the COVID injections is for HHS Secretary RFK Jr. to revoke the PREP Act liability shield, which he can do unilaterally. In an open letter, Sasha Latypova argues that the current emergency declaration is unfounded and that the COVID jabs are Emergency Use Authorized military countermeasures. RFK Jr. has previously described the clinical trials as "meaningless theater" and stated that the safety of these jabs relies solely on the HHS Secretary's opinion. He claims that continued use of the PREP Act shield allows for "mass murder" and undermines public trust in health authorities.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

This is *the only realistic way* to get the COVID injections pulled. HHS Secretary RFK Jr. (@SecKennedy) must revoke the PREP Act liability shield for the jabs—and he can do that NOW, *UNILATERALLY* If he does not, he becomes complicit in "mass murder" (his quote) (A 🧵, 1/11) In this open letter recently posted by Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova), the retired pharma R&D executive calls on RFK Jr. to "use [his] authority to immediately terminate the PREP Act emergency declaration for the covid pandemic, as there is no such emergency in reality." She notes, "All mRNA injections marketed as covid vaccines today are Emergency Use Authorized (EUA) Military Countermeasures." Latypova adds that the COVID injections are being given to babies as the jabs are now on the CDC's immunization schedule, and that this means, in effect, that it's RFK Jr.'s opinion—by default—that this is an acceptable practice. The retired pharma R&D executive goes on to say that the COVID injections constitute "the greatest human tragedy in recorded history" and have also "destroyed public trust in the government['s] health agencies." Approximate transcription of Latypova's remarks in this clip: "Secretary Kennedy, "All mRNA injections marketed as covid vaccines today are Emergency Use Authorized (EUA) Military Countermeasures. The EUA pathway is used only when the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services declares an emergency and issues a PREP Act declaration. Section 564 of the Food and Drugs and Cosmetics Act exempts medical countermeasures from the pharmaceutical regulatory compliance or from the informed consent requirements for the duration of the PREP Act declaration of emergency. While the manufacturers may choose and FDA may ask to undertake some of the activities typically expected from an investigational clinical trial and manufacturing validation process, none of the typical pharmaceutical regulatory standards are applicable in an enforceable way. "If there is no enforcement of the law, it’s as if the law doesn't exist. Misrepresentations of safety, efficacy or contents of EUA products are allowed by federal law. Thus, claims provided by the federal health authorities or manufacturers cannot be considered reliable sources of information. When these products are pushed onto unsuspecting consumers, claims about safety, efficacy or contents of these products are based solely on the HHS Secretary’s opinion, which requires no supporting scientific evidence. Today, three mRNA shots are listed on the CDC Childhood Vaccination Schedule to be given to 9 months old infants. Secretary Kennedy, are we supposed to think that it is now YOUR opinion that they are safe and effective for babies? I do not believe that, knowing what you know about mRNA injections, you can honestly believe this yourself. Current PREP Act emergency declaration [for covid] was extended by the previous administration by Xavier Becerra and it's now supposed to last until December 31, 2029! "Real emergencies do not last decades simply based on the opinion of a single public health official. There is no real emergency for covid in the United Sates or worldwide as you are well aware. Continued PREP Act declarations, therefore, defy the observed reality and common sense, and represents a misuse and abuse of the federal law which was intended for declaring short-term emergencies in severe situations such as war or acts of terrorism. This law also did not envision shipping of billions of doses of medical products legally allowed to be adulterated and misbranded. Yet, this is precisely what is transpiring under the current PREP Act declaration today. "By keeping the PREP Act declaration in place, the current administration continues to contrive a non-existing emergency. This contrivance serves only the interests of pharmaceutical companies and those institutions that still mandate the shots, shielding them from liability for deaths and injuries caused by the falsely promoted inherently unsafe products. Clearly, this contrivance does not serve the interests of the public at all. The continued disregard of the victims of the covid shots under the thorough liability shield of the PREP Act abuses the federal law and destroys any remaining shreds of the public trust in the government health authorities. These products pose severe risk of harm and death to the public due to the absence of any enforceable pharmaceutical regulations. "The FDA and manufacturers falsely claim that these products are fully approved for age 12 and older as prophylactic vaccines. However, once someone is injured by these vaccines and seeks compensation for their injuries, they are informed that the products are not legally vaccines but countermeasures, and the only avenue available to them is the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program. "To date this program has denied almost all claims and paid only a few thousand dollars to a handful of victims, making a mockery of them and the unbearable toll of their permanently destroyed health. During your Congressional confirmation hearings you said that a healthy person has a thousand dreams while a sick person has only one dream. Were you sincere about helping the covid vaccine victims? Secretary Kennedy, I respectfully ask you to: "Please use your authority to immediately terminate the PREP Act emergency declaration for covid pandemic, as there is no such emergency in reality. "Please also investigate the misuse and abuse of the federal law utilized in the so-called 'pandemic response' and countermeasures that resulted in the greatest human tragedy in recorded history and also destroyed public trust in the government health agencies."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Secretary Kennedy, the mRNA injections marketed as COVID vaccines are merely emergency use authorized medical countermeasures. This pathway bypasses standard pharmaceutical regulations and informed consent. Misrepresentations about these products' safety and efficacy are legally permissible, making official claims unreliable. These shots are now on the CDC childhood vaccination schedule for infants as young as nine months old. The current PREP Act declaration, extended until 2029, abuses federal law intended for short-term emergencies. This shields pharmaceutical companies from liability for deaths and injuries caused by these unsafe products. The FDA falsely claims full approval for those 12 and older, yet the injured are directed to a compensation program that denies almost all claims. I urge you to terminate the PREP Act emergency declaration and investigate the misuse of federal law in the pandemic response, which has led to a human tragedy and destroyed public trust.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is my open letter to health and human services secretary Robert Kennedy junior. Secretary Kennedy, all mRNA injections marketed as COVID vaccines today are emergency use authorized EUA medical countermeasures. The EUA pathway is used only when The United States Secretary Of Health And Human Services declares an emergency and issues a prep act declaration. Section five six four of the Food and Drugs and Cosmetics Act exempt medical countermeasures from the pharmaceutical regulatory compliance or from the informed consent requirements for the duration of the Prep Act declaration of emergency. While the manufacturers may choose and FDA may ask to undertake some of the activities typically expected from the investigational clinical trial and manufacturing validation process, none of the typical pharmaceutical regulatory standards are applicable in an enforceable way. If there is no enforcement of the law, it's as if the law doesn't exist. Misrepresentations of safety, efficacy, or contents of EUA products are allowed by federal law. Thus, claims provided by the federal health authorities or manufacturers cannot be considered a reliable source of information. When these products are pushed onto unsuspecting consumers, claims about safety, efficacy, or contents of these products are based solely on the HHS secretary's opinion, which requires no supporting scientific evidence. Today, three mRNA shots are listed on the CDC childhood vaccination schedule to be given to nine months old infants. Secretary Kennedy, I was supposed to think that this is now your opinion that these are safe and effective products for babies. I do not believe that knowing what you know about mRNA injections, you can honestly believe this yourself. Current PREP Act declaration of emergency was extended by the outgoing HHS secretary Javier Bissera, and it's now supposed to last until 12/31/2029. Real emergencies do not last decades simply based on the opinion of a single public health official. There is no real emergency for COVID in the world or in The United States, and you are well aware of this. Continued PREP Act declaration, therefore, defies the observed reality and common sense and represents a misuse and abuse of the federal law, which was intended for declaring short term emergencies in severe situations such as war or acts of terrorism. This law also did not envision shipping of billions of doses of medical products legally allowed to be adulterated and misbranded. Yet this is precisely what is transpiring on the current PrEP Act declaration today. By keeping PrEP Act declaration in place, the current administration continues to contrive a nonexisting emergency. This contrivance serves only the interests of pharmaceutical companies and those institutions that still mandate the shots, shielding them from liability for deaths and injuries caused by the falsely promoted inherently unsafe products. Clearly, this contrivance does not serve the interest of the public at all. The continued disregard of the victims of the COVID shots under the thorough liability shield of the PREP Act abuses the federal law and destroys any remaining shreds of the public trust in the government health authorities. These products pose severe risk of harm and death to the public due to the absence of any enforceable pharmaceutical regulations. The FDA and manufacturers falsely claim that these products are fully approved for age 12 and older as prophylactic vaccines. However, once someone is injured by these vaccines and seeks compensation for their injuries, they are informed that in fact these products are not legally vaccines but countermeasures. And the only avenue available to them is the countermeasures injury compensation program. To date, this program has denied almost all claims and paid only a few thousand dollars to a handful of victims, making a mockery of them and the unbearable toll of their permanently destroyed health. During your congressional confirmation hearings, you said that a healthy person has a thousand dreams while a sick person has only one dream. Were you sincere about helping the COVID vaccine victims? Secretary Kennedy, I respectfully ask you to please use your authority to immediately terminate the PREP Act emergency declaration for COVID pandemic as there is no such emergency in reality. Please also investigate the misuse and abuse of the federal law utilized in the so called pandemic response and countermeasures that resulted in the greatest human tragedy in recorded history and also destroyed the public trust in the government health agencies. Thank you very much.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

@SecKennedy (2/11) Note RFK Jr. said in a March 2023 discussion that the "clinical trials" for the COVID injections were, quote: "meaningless theater." RFK Jr. added that the jabs are "a demonstration product, not a medical product" and that "the FDA has no authority over [them]."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The COVID-19 vaccines were rolled out under a series of laws that allowed the military to take over distribution, bypassing typical clinical trials and safety testing. The FDA's involvement was a "pretend authorization," as their mandate is to regulate interstate commerce of medical products, not countermeasures. The Department of Defense is fully in charge of the development, clinical trials, manufacturing, and distribution of the vaccines, utilizing "other transaction authority" (OTA), initially intended for NASA and weapons procurement. The vaccines are purchased under OTA as demonstration products, exempting them from FDA and CDC authority. Pharmaceutical companies were brought in largely for branding purposes, while the military oversaw manufacturing and distribution through military contractors.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me let me just give a punchline to what you're about to tell us, which is that essentially there were a series of laws put in place that allowed the military to take over distribution of vaccines and under a provision that does not allow any clinical trials and does not allow any safety testing. And that essentially the safety testing that we did see, which was conducted by the pharmaceutical industry, was kabuki theater put on for the public with no regulatory implications. And that's why they were able to take all these shortcuts because it was meaningless, theater. I I'm gonna let you explain kind of the long version of that, but that's what people you know, that's kind of where we're going. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yes. Exactly. So it was, you know, a pretend authorization by a a a regulatory agency, FDA, that has no, regulatory mandate to regulate countermeasures in The United States. You know, remember, the FDA mandate is to regulate interstate commerce of medical products and food. Right? So they are supposed to approve medical products, and these are not medical products. They're countermeasures. So that that legal framework that's being utilized here is is essentially pretending that this this this this is a health event and pretending that these are health products while using the laws that actually put them into a totally different space legally or pseudo legally, I would say. So so in addition to the emergency use authorization, they're using another set of set of laws that are called that they're allowing them to contract under other transaction authority. So department of defense and they're not just overseeing the distribution of vaccines, by the way. That was sold to the public also. They're actually department of defense is fully in charge of their of the development of the clinical trials, of the execution of all this manufacturing and ordering of them and distributing the money and taking the possession of the delivered product and distributing it and owning it until it is injected into a person. So so the the they're using other transaction authority, which is this is which is a way for the government to contract. Again, initially, it was very narrowly defined given, authority to NASA to do it in the sixties. Now 11 government agencies are using it, and DOD is a particular frequent user of this method. Speaker 0: Other transaction authority is called a OTA. OTA. And it was essentially designed to allow the Pentagon to quickly buy weapons and weapon systems Speaker 1: Mhmm. Speaker 0: Without paying attention to any regulatory any existing regulatory authorities. Yes. What they've done is they've taken that authority, and they've applied it to the vaccines. So they're purchasing the vaccines under OTA as a demonstration product project prod product. It's not a medical product. So it has FDA has no authority over it. CDC has no authority over it. Military is actually manufacturing. They've farmed this out to hundreds of military contractors to do the manufacturing, to do the distribution, to do every aspect of it, and it's all a huge military operation. And the involvement of the drug companies is kind of window dressing because the Pentagon did not wanna say did not wanna put on the product product. This is a Pentagon made, defense department made product. They essentially paid the pharmaceutical companies for their brand name, people would think they were getting something from Pfizer or Moderna. Speaker 1: But Speaker 0: all of the back room and the, you know, the distribution and manufacturing is done by the military, and the the and the the pharmaceutical companies were brought in to put their name on it and then to pretend to do clinical trials which have no legal significance. Speaker 1: Absolutely. Yeah. That's exactly right. So Speaker 0: OTA

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(3/11) RFK Jr. said in the same discussion, quote: "[Regarding the COVID jabs] the only determination [they're safe/effective] is that the Secretary of HHS decides, in his head, with either some evidence, or no evidence whatsoever, that the product may be effective. That's it." RFK Jr. adds, "even if the evidence then shows that it's not effective, if he can say, 'Well, I still believe it's effective, it stays on the market. Even if there's a mountain of evidence that says it's killing people, it's not effective, he can choose, legally, under his own decision-making, that I'm going to believe that this is effective, no matter what the evidence says, and as long as I believe it's effective, legally, I can essentially mandate it for all Americans."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Normally, bringing a product to market involves proposals, clinical trial designs for efficacy and safety, years of trials, and FDA determinations on safety, efficacy, harm versus benefit, warnings, and inspections. All of this is abolished. Now, the HHS secretary only needs to decide, with or without evidence, that a product may be effective. Even if evidence shows ineffectiveness, they can still believe it's effective. This decision-making allows them to legally mandate the product for all Americans, regardless of evidence to the contrary. There are no stopping criteria, and the secretary never has to reconsider their decision because there were no criteria to begin with.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me just clarify what you're saying. Normally, you know, the the protocols that you had to go through in your businesses, you would do, you know, you do a series of proposals. You design the clinical trials to make sure that they're going to show efficacy, that they're going to be show safety. You do those clinical trials for a number of years, and then you go and show the results to FDA, and FDA has to make determinations about safety and efficacy and has to make determinations that the product is going to avert more harm than it causes, and the appropriate warnings and the, you know, the side effects that you put on the manufacturer's inserts and all these thousand things that you have to do to get a product to market and get the inspections, etcetera. Here, all of those are abolished. And the only determination is that the secretary of HHS decides in his head with either some evidence or no evidence whatsoever that the product may be effective. Mhmm. That's it. That's it. That's it. So and even if the evidence then shows that it's not effective, if he can say, well, I still believe it's effective. Absolutely. Never Even if there's a mountain of evidence that says it's killing people, it's not effective, he can choose legally, his own decision making that I'm gonna believe this is effective no matter what the evidence says. And as long as I believe it's effective legally, I can, you know, essentially mandate it for all Americans. Speaker 1: Absolutely. There is no stopping criteria. He never has to reconsider the decision. And since there is no criteria to begin with, well, whatever made him believe so can continue making him believe so.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(4/11) RFK said in the same discussion, quote: "all these actors...[are] getting away LITERALLY WITH MURDER, with mayhem, with MASS MURDER..because they have been given this shield of immunity from liability [via the PREP Act/CARES Act/and the 1986 childhood vaccine act]." (Emphasis added.) RFK Jr. goes on to call the actions surrounding the COVID injections "ILLEGAL ACTS." (Emphasis added.)

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm an attorney looking for ways to sue those responsible for damages during the pandemic, but the PrEP Act, the CARE Act, and the 1986 VICA Vaccine Act, provide broad immunity from liability. As a corporate liability officer, my colleague and I agree, that we should go after Pfizer for the fraud they have committed. The challenge is figuring out how to break through their defenses. Pfizer will argue they delivered the fraud that the government ordered. Even if a case gets dismissed based on this argument, the admission itself is valuable. We need to get them to admit in court whether committing mass murder and genocide is explicit US government policy, or if individuals like Kotlik, Marks, and Fauci were rogue actors acting outside their authority.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. Well, I'm gonna let you go, Sajid. But before I do, I'm an attorney. I try to figure out ways to sue people like this. And, you know, one of the frustrating things during this pandemic is that the PrEP Act, the CARE Act, the 1986 VICA Vaccine Act have all bestowed broad immunity from liability under all of these actors. So they're getting away literally with murder, with am, with mass murder. They're getting away with it because they have been given this bubble of this shield of immunity from liability. You have an expertise in in corporate liability. As a corporate liability officer, do you see any obvious ways where somebody like me can file a lawsuit and get redressed for some of these, illegal acts? Speaker 1: Yeah. So, first of all, neither me nor my colleagues, discourage anyone from doing just that, to just going after Pfizer because of all the fraud that they have committed. I think what the the problem is we're all having, we don't know, exactly what's going to crack that that wall, but we have to attempt different ways. Now the, yes, we can try going after Pfizer. I'm just saying, you know, here's the lay of the land. This is the the defense they're going to invoke. They already invoked it in Brooke Jackson's case. They're saying we did not defraud the government. We delivered the fraud that the government ordered. And that's a even Speaker 0: Which gay? Oh, in Brooke Jackson. Speaker 1: In Brooke Jackson's in April, they filed motion to dismiss. So and while, you know, the case may be dismissed it hasn't been dismissed. But in let's say in the future, it gets dismissed because because of this. That admission alone is priceless, and we need to elicit these admissions in court. They need to tell us ultimately ultimately through whatever method we're going to to go after. Ultimately, they they need to tell us it's an explicit US government policy to commit mass murder and genocide, or these were rogue actors, these people, Robert Kotlik, Peter Marx, you know, Fauci, whoever. You know, these specific individuals, they were rogue actors and acting outside of their authority. Speaker 0: So

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

@SecKennedy (5/11) Furthermore, RFK Jr. even noted in the same discussion that there are "devastatingly effective" drugs "against COVID," including hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. He notes acknowledging this "[kills] the entire use of the emergency use authorization" for the COVID jabs.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) regulation from the Clinton administration included safeguards. You can distribute a medication without approval, clinical trials, or safety testing, but only if no existing approved drug is effective against the target illness. To use the EUA for vaccines, any effective drugs against COVID needed to be discredited. Early on, it was known that hydroxychloroquine was effective against coronavirus. NIH studies demonstrated its effectiveness both as a preventative and as a cure. Ivermectin was also very effective. Acknowledging that these drugs worked would have eliminated the use of the emergency use authorization. So, they had to suppress them.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just to to elucidate this for our listeners, the, the EUA provision regulation that was promulgated by the Clinton administration had safeguards in it. And it said, yes, you can you can take a medication that has no approval, and you can distribute it and approve it for use without clinical trials, without any safety or efficacy testing. But you cannot do that if there is an existing drug that is approved for any purpose that is demonstrated to be effective against the target illness. And so, you can only use that EUA if no other drug or treatment exists. And so it was very important if they wanted to use that EUA for their vaccines, they needed to first discredit or destroy any drugs that actually were effective against COVID. And very early on, they they knew that hydroxychloroquine was effective against coronavirus because NIH did studies that showed it was it was devastatingly effective both as a preventative and as a cure, and they knew that. And ivermectin was also devastatingly effective, but they it would have killed their entire use of the emergency use authorization if there had been any acknowledgment that those drugs were, so they had to suppress them. So that and let me

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(6/11) Finally, RFK Jr. goes on to note that the FDA "lied" to get Moderna's COVID jab approved for pregnant women. He notes when Moderna did animal testing, rat pups developed "horrible bone deformities...and it was a signal that was as loud [of] a signal that you...ever see in medicine." He adds that the rats were "horrendously deformed, and yet FDA...lied about it [the study on the rat pups] by saying there were no problems with the rat study." RFK Jr. adds that, for the FDA, "it was just a huge enterprise in lying."

Video Transcript AI Summary
We found that the FDA lied about a maternal rat study that was testing the safety of mandating a vaccine to pregnant women. In every litter, individual pups had horrible bone deformities. This signal was extremely prominent. Moderna submitted the rat study, as they were required to do. The FDA then lied about the study results by claiming there were no problems. It was a huge enterprise in lying.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: FDA actually lied, as you would have pointed out, as they did a rat study for to look at a maternal rat study to look at if they gave this vaccine to rats. This is how they were testing whether it was safe to mandate to pregnant women. Mhmm. And in every litter of rats, there were individual pups who had these really horrible bone deformities. Mhmm. And it was a signal that was as loud as a signal that you can get that you ever see in medicine. I mean, these rats were horrendously deformed. And and yet FDA, when it looked and Moderna didn't even try to lie about it. Moderna submitted the the rat study because it had to, and then FDA lied about it by saying there were no problems with the rat study. Mhmm. Yep. It was just a huge enterprise in lying. Absolutely. So they the FDA

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(7/11) Note these claims aren't speculation on the part of Latypova or RFK Jr. These are all checkable facts. In the COVID-jab contract between DOD & Pfizer, the former paid the latter $1.95 billion for a "large scale vaccine manufacturing demonstration" of a "prototype." (1) When Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson sued Pfizer over its fraudulent clinical trials, Pfizer itself confirmed that it was only responsible for producing a "large scale vaccine manufacturing demonstration" that imposed "no requirements related to Good Clinical Practices" ('CGP') or related FDA regulations." (2) Source: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22028602-pfizer-contract-statement-of-work/ Source: https://www.iambrookjackson.com/_files/ugd/9df0bc_b7e94cf398e74b35a9182f27e685348b.pdf

Pfizer Contract Statement of Work documentcloud.org

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

@SecKennedy (8/11) The HHS Secretary unilaterally declares a "public health emergency" and unilaterally decides if "countermeasures" are warranted. Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/04/01/2020-06905/emergency-use-authorization-declaration Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/04/01/2020-06905/emergency-use-authorization-declaration

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(9/11) According to the Code of Federal Regulations, "the use of [products] within the scope of [an EUA] authorization shall not be considered to constitute a clinical investigation." Furthermore, the jabs can't be considered "adulterated" unless the HHS Sec says they are. Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/360bbb-3 Source: https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title21-section360bbb-3a&num=0&edition=prelim

21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3 - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies law.cornell.edu

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

@SecKennedy (10/11) The HHS Secretary **UNILATERALLY** decides whether or not the (unconstitutional) PREP Act liability shield remains in place for the COVID injections. Once the liability shield is removed, the jabs stop—entirely and immediately. Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/04/01/2020-06905/emergency-use-authorization-declaration https://t.co/cKDQgoWDFd

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

@SecKennedy (11/11) Why is RFK Jr. complicit in "mass murder" (his term) if he doesn't act to pull the jabs? Because as HHS Secretary he now has a "duty to act." He knows the jabs are "mass murder" (his term) and he is in a position to do something about it. Just ask Grok: https://t.co/UyeUMbDn9d

WallStreetApes
Posted - April 20, 2025 at 1:52 PM
Saved - April 20, 2025 at 2:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I want to highlight a serious issue regarding JBS, the world's largest meat processing company. They've been charged with bribing over 1,800 politicians and officials. Additionally, they've exploited a loophole that allows them to import cheap foreign meats while labeling them as "Product of the USA." Although this loophole is set to close, enforcement won't begin until 2026. Until then, they can bring in lower-quality beef, process it here, and mislabel it, raising concerns about the safety and quality of the meat we consume.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Everyone should be aware of this The owners of JBS, the worlds largest meat processing company, has been charged with bribing over 1,800 politicians and officials They’ve been importing cheap foreign meats and using the“Product of the USA” labeling loophole This is a racket. Remember, even though this loophole made by the USDA has finally been closed it won’t be fully enforced until 2026 Until then, “They can import essentially a lower standard beef into America. All they have to do is break it down here so it arrives into America as a frozen slab of beef, essentially. They can turn it into steaks and hamburger from there. And then they can sell it as product of the usa. And they're allowed to label that as product of the usa, which it is not. And it's shot up with who knows what (vaccines)”

Video Transcript AI Summary
JBS has allegedly bribed over 3,000 government officials to import lower-standard beef into America. The beef arrives as frozen slabs, is processed into steaks and hamburger, and then sold as a product of the USA, which it allegedly is not. This imported beef may contain unknown additives. This practice undercuts American ranchers, and instead of feeding Americans, JBS exports American products.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So one of these companies, JBS, what they're doing is they have, through lobbyists, they have convinced and they've even been the owners of it have even been charged with bribes, bribing over 3,000 government officials so that they can import essentially lower standard beef into America. All they have to do is break it down here. So it it arrives into America as a frozen slab of beef essentially. They can turn it into steaks and hamburger from there, and then they can sell it as product of The USA. And they're allowed to label that as product of The USA which it is not and it's shot up with who knows what. Meanwhile, they undercut our American ranchers and they export our products instead of feeding our products to the American people. That's outrageous.
JimFergusonUK
Posted - June 1, 2025 at 8:31 AM
Saved - June 1, 2025 at 10:25 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The USDA has approved genetically engineered vaccines for use in organic food production, compromising the integrity of the organic label. This change means that animals treated with DNA-altering injections can now be sold as certified organic, leading to concerns about purity and consumer deception. I believe this move reflects a broader agenda to undermine clean food and personal choice, as regulatory loopholes allow GE technology to infiltrate our food supply. It's crucial to defend the integrity of organic farming before it's irreversibly altered.

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

BREAKING:🚨 ORGANIC ISN’T SAFE ANYMORE — USDA OPENS THE DOOR TO GENETIC ENGINEERING 🚨 🔴 The USDA has quietly approved genetically engineered (GE) vaccines for use in organic food production. 🔴 Yes — the very label millions trust is being corrupted from within. 🔴 Animals treated with DNA-altering injections can now be sold as certified organic. 🔥 THIS ISN’T SCIENCE — THIS IS SABOTAGE 🔥 📢 WHAT THIS MEANS: ⚠️ The "organic" label no longer guarantees purity. ⚠️ GE technology is being smuggled into your food through regulatory loopholes. ⚠️ Consumers are being deliberately deceived. ⚠️ This is a globalist war on clean food, bodily autonomy, and informed choice. 💥 First, they altered the food supply. 💥 Then, they blurred the labels. 💥 Now, they’re injecting biotechnology into what was once sacred — our organic farms. 🚨 THIS ISN’T ABOUT HEALTH — THIS IS ABOUT CONTROL 🚨 Corrupt agencies. Complicit certifiers. They want a future where nothing is natural — and nothing is yours. 👊 Reject the deception. Defend organic integrity. Because once it's gone — it's gone forever. https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-08-22-usda-allows-ge-vaccines-in-organic-food-production.html

BEWARE: USDA allows genetically engineered vaccines to infiltrate organic food production – NaturalNews.com The Alliance for Natural Health (ANH-USA) discussed in an article how the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and other organic certifiers are allowing the genetically engineered (GE) vaccines to infiltrate organic food production. In 2019 the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB), an advisory committee of the USDA, decided to consider the use of vaccines produced through “excluded methods” or […] naturalnews.com
ValerieAnne1970
Posted - June 26, 2025 at 5:53 AM
Saved - June 26, 2025 at 6:47 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Over 85% of grass-fed beef labeled as "Product of USA" is actually imported, misleading consumers who believe it comes from American ranches. The USDA allows this labeling due to a loophole that permits foreign beef to be labeled as U.S. product if it undergoes minimal processing in the U.S. This change began in 2015 when mandatory country-of-origin labeling was rolled back. To ensure support for local farmers, it's crucial to buy meat directly from them. I'm happy to provide referrals for local beef and other meats available for delivery.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

Over 85% Of Grass Fed Beef In America Is Imported Product...These Cows Were Not Born Here, Did Not Graze Here & Were Never Processed Here. Jenni & Will Harris Yet, The USDA & FDA Give Their Stamp Of Safety Approval & Allow This Foreign Beef To Be Labeled As 'Product Of The USA.' Beware of misleading “Product of USA” labels on supermarket beef. Consumers buying a package of steaks at the supermarket marked “Product of USA” likely believe that the label means it was raised on an American ranch. Maybe it’s also marked “Grass Fed,” & they imagine a grassy hillside somewhere in the U.S. dotted with healthy cattle. They assume they know where their family’s food comes from. The problem? Over 85% of beef & pork in the package labeled with a big USA sticker on it came from one of 20+ foreign countries. Thanks to lobbying efforts by powerful meatpackers, such as JBS, Tyson & Cargill, current law allows use of the “Product of USA” label even when the beef & pork was born, raised & processed in a foreign country as long as...once the meat enters the U.S. it undergoes repackaging or what the USDA refers to as 'value added.' 'Value Added' is a loophole term that if the foreign beef & pork has been repackaged, sliced, cut or ground up on USA soil, then it is legally labeled as 'product of the USA.' The trouble began in 2015, when President Barack Obama & the USDA rolled back Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) for beef & pork products, allowing meat to be sold without disclosing its home country on the label. In December 2015, President Barack Obama signed the Consolidated Appropriations Act which removed mandatory country-of-origin labeling requirements for muscle cuts of beef & pork as well as ground beef & pork. Under the current rules, beef & pork products that are shipped to the United States can be labeled “product of U.S.A.,” even when the animal was raised a continent away. That means a steer born, raised & slaughtered in Uruguay can be repackaged at a meatpacking plant in Colorado & labeled 'product of USA.' These labeling loopholes prevent consumers from knowing where the beef they feed their families is coming from & whether or not their dollars are supporting American ranchers. Crucial now more than ever, is to purchase beef, pork & all meat, locally from farmers & ranchers. Support your local farmer & rancher. Let me know in the comments if you need referrals on how to find local beef or for beef, pork & poultry that can be shipped to your door. 👇Foreign Beef Can Be Labeled As USA Beef👇 https://prosperousamerica.org/foreign-beef-can-legally-be-labeled-product-of-u-s-a-its-killing-americas-grass-fed-industry/ 👇USDA Food Labeling Policy Book👇 https://www.fsis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/import/Labeling-Policy-Book.pdf 👇You Can't Judge Your Beef By The Sticker👇 https://hageman.house.gov/media/in-the-news/you-cant-judge-your-beef-sticker#:~:text=Thanks%20to%20lobbying%20efforts%20by,undergoes%20minimal%20processing%20or%20repackaging Speakers: Will & Jenni Harris of White Oak Pastures Podcast: @joerogan Video: @Investearnsave_

Video Transcript AI Summary
Over 85% of grass-fed beef in the American market is imported, not raised in America. This is a shift from the US being an early innovator to now representing only 15% of the market. Imported beef can be legally labeled as a product of the USA if value is added in this country through grinding, slicing, cutting, packaging, labeling, or reboxing. The animal can be born, raised, and slaughtered in countries like Uruguay, Australia, or New Zealand. The United States imports beef from places like Australia, Canada, and Latin America, runs it through USDA inspection, and if it passes, labels it as a product of the USA.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Over 85% of the grass fed beef in the American market is imported product, not raised in America. Ain't that nuts? In twenty years, we've gone from being a very early innovator to just a mere meager portion of 15%. Speaker 1: That's true, but it's not the worst part. The worst part is that imported beef is legally labeled product of The USA. Speaker 2: How's that? Speaker 1: If value is added in this country, it's a product of The USA. What? And we we compete with we compete with it every day. Speaker 2: How do they add value? Speaker 0: Go ahead. No. You go. This is good. Speaker 1: If they grind it, slice it, cut it, package it, label it Speaker 0: Rebox it. Speaker 1: Transport it. But the animal make make no mistake. The animal was born, raised, and slaughtered in Uruguay, Australia, New Zealand, or 20 other countries. Speaker 2: The United States imports beef from places like Australia, Canada, much of Latin America. It then runs that beef through USDA inspection, and if it passes, sticks a label on it that reads product of The USA. How dare you?
Foreign beef can legally be labeled “Product of U.S.A.” It’s killing America’s grass-fed industry. | Coalition For A Prosperous America Editor’s note: This article shows how the elimination of country of origin labeling for meat caused American producers’ share of the grass fed cattle market prosperousamerica.org
You can’t judge your beef by the sticker You need to beware of misleading “Product of USA” labels on supermarket beef because looks can be deceiving.  hageman.house.gov
RealDrJaneRuby
Posted - August 5, 2025 at 2:47 AM
Saved - August 5, 2025 at 10:29 PM

@RealDrJaneRuby - DR JANE RUBY™️

THE U.S. FDA HAS APPROVED LAB CREATED CHICKEN, BEEF, AND SALMON - these lab made meats are often created from immortal human cancer cell lines that just keep growing Buy your chickens WHOLE and get your meat from a butcher where you can watch it cut up https://t.co/S0Rf7Cq4Bo

newstart_2024
Posted - August 9, 2025 at 5:49 PM
Saved - August 9, 2025 at 7:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that 70% of supermarket ground beef contains "pink slime," a cheap filler made from beef trimmings, previously meant for dog food. It's treated with ammonia to kill bacteria, which raises serious concerns. Whistleblowers warned about it, but their voices went unheard. Would you eat this?

@newstart_2024 - Camus

Shocking truth about your ground beef 70% of supermarket ground beef contains "pink slime"—a cheap filler made from beef trimmings once used only for dog food and cooking oil. Sprayed with ammonia to kill bacteria, this "lean, finely textured beef" is not fresh ground beef—it’s an economic fraud. USDA whistleblowers Gerald Zirnstein and Carl Custer warned against it, but their concerns were ignored. Would you knowingly eat ammonia-treated scraps?

Video Transcript AI Summary
USDA scientist, now whistleblower, says 70% of the ground beef we buy at the supermarket contains something he calls pink slime: beef trimmings that were once used only in dog food and cooking oil now sprayed with ammonia to make them safe to eat and then added to most ground beef as a cheaper filler. Zernstein, who in a USDA memo first coined the term pink slime, is coming forward to say he won't buy it. It's economic fraud. It's not it's not, fresh ground beef. Zernstein and his fellow USDA scientist Carl Custer both warned against using what the industry calls lean, finely textured beef and is widely known now as pink slime. But their government bosses overruled them. Why didn't you consider it beef? Because it was a salvage product. Leftovers fat that had been heated at low temperature and the excess fat spun out.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: USDA scientist, now whistleblower, knows that 70% of the ground beef we buy at the supermarket contains something he calls pink slime. Beef trimmings that were once used only in dog food and cooking oil now sprayed with ammonia to make them safe to eat and then added to most ground beef as a cheaper filler. It was Zernstein who in a USDA memo first coined the term pink slime and is now coming forward to say he won't buy it. It's economic fraud. It's not it's not, fresh ground beef. It's a substitute. It's a cheap substitute being added in. Zernstein and his fellow USDA scientist Carl Custer both warned against using what the industry calls lean, finely textured beef and is widely known now as pink slime. But their government bosses overruled them. Why didn't you consider it beef? Because it was a salvage product. Leftovers fat that had been heated at low temperature and the excess fat spun out. Here's how it's done. Those waste trimmings are gathered simmered at low heat to make it easier to separate fat from muscle put in a centrifuge and spun to finish the separation. Next the mixture is sent through pipes where it's sprayed with ammonia gas to kill bacteria and finally compressed into bricks and flash frozen for shipment to meat packers and grocery stores where it's added to most ground beef.
ValerieAnne1970
Posted - October 12, 2025 at 5:54 AM
Saved - October 12, 2025 at 6:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read that the USDA allows "Product of USA" labels on grass-fed beef that never lived on American soil. Nearly 90% of U.S. grass-fed beef is imported. Once repackaged in the U.S., it can be labeled as U.S. product, due to COOL rollback in 2015. A steer born in Uruguay can be sold as American after processing in Colorado. Will Harris calls it deceptive; the practice hinges on a "value added" loophole. The piece urges buying local.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

USDA Allows 'Product of USA' Labels On Grass Fed Beef That Never Lived On American Soil. Almost 90% Of American Market Grass Fed Beef Is Imported From 20+ Foreign Countries. Once The Foreign Meat Enters The US, Repackaging It Makes It 'Legal' To Qualify As A 'Product Of USA.' The elimination of country of origin labeling for meat caused American producers’ share of the grass fed cattle market to decline from 60% to less than 15% in just a few years. In 2015, the Obama administration’s USDA rolled back Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) for beef & pork products, allowing meat to be sold without disclosing what country it came from, on the label. Under current rules, beef & pork products that are shipped to the United States can be labeled “product of U.S.A.,” even when the animal was raised on another continent. A steer that is born, raised & processed in Uruguay can be cut into steaks or ground up & repackaged at a meatpacking plant in Colorado & is labeled as American meat—even when it isn’t. "The very idea of labeling beef in a grocery store ‘product of U.S.A.,’ when the animal never drew a breath of air on this continent, is just horrible,” says Will Harris, owner of White Oak Pastures, which produces its branded line of grass-fed beef in Bluffton, Georgia." "I don’t begrudge importers or producers from other countries selling to knowing consumers that want to buy that imported product. But I’m appalled at what the deception has done to the economies of our ranchers." Imported grass fed beef brands are taking advantage of a legal ambiguity—& some are downright deceptive. 3 powerful meatpackers...JBS, Tyson & Cargill, are deceptively using the law that allows use of the “Product of USA” label even when the beef & pork was born, raised & processed in a foreign country. Once the meat enters the U.S. it undergoes repackaging or what the USDA refers to as 'value added.' 'Value Added' is a loophole term that if the foreign beef & pork has been sliced, cut, ground or repackaged on American soil, then it is legally labeled as 'product of the USA.' Now, more than ever, it is crucial for our health & in support of American farmers & ranchers...to buy local, to purchase from small reputable butcher shops & to order from online grass fed beef shipping ranchers. 👇USDA Food Labeling Policy Book👇 https://www.fsis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/import/Labeling-Policy-Book.pdf 👇Foreign Meat Contamination Found In US👇 https://www.reuters.com/world/exclusive-us-sees-spike-contaminated-australian-meat-shipments-documents-2021-10-27/#:~:text=Reuters%20Plus-,EXCLUSIVE%20U.S.%20sees%20spike%20in%20contaminated%20Australian%20meat%20shipments%20%2D%20documents,to%20documents%20reviewed%20by%20Reuters. 👇Imported Beef Found To Be Contaminated👇 https://www.northernag.net/u-s-cattlemens-concerned-about-contaminated-mexican-beef/ Speakers: Will & Jenni Harris of White Oak Pastures Video: @Investearnsave_ Podcast: @joerogan

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Over 85% of the grass fed beef in the American market is imported product, not raised in America. In twenty years, we've gone from being a very early innovator to just a mere meager portion of 15%. Speaker 1: The worst part is that imported beef is legally labeled product of The USA. Speaker 2: How's that? Speaker 1: If value is added in this country, it's a product of The USA. Speaker 1: If they grind it, slice it, cut it, package it, label it Speaker 0: Rebox it. Speaker 1: Transport it. But the animal make make no mistake. The animal was born, raised, and slaughtered in Uruguay, Australia, New Zealand, or 20 other countries. Speaker 2: The United States imports beef from places like Australia, Canada, much of Latin America. It then runs that beef through USDA inspection, and if it passes, sticks a label on it that reads product of The USA. How dare you?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Over 85% of the grass fed beef in the American market is imported product, not raised in America. Ain't that nuts? In twenty years, we've gone from being a very early innovator to just a mere meager portion of 15%. Speaker 1: That's true, but it's not the worst part. The worst part is that imported beef is legally labeled product of The USA. Speaker 2: How's that? Speaker 1: If value is added in this country, it's a product of The USA. What? And we we compete with we compete with it every day. Speaker 2: How do they add value? Speaker 0: Go ahead. No. You go. This is good. Speaker 1: If they grind it, slice it, cut it, package it, label it Speaker 0: Rebox it. Speaker 1: Transport it. But the animal make make no mistake. The animal was born, raised, and slaughtered in Uruguay, Australia, New Zealand, or 20 other countries. Speaker 2: The United States imports beef from places like Australia, Canada, much of Latin America. It then runs that beef through USDA inspection, and if it passes, sticks a label on it that reads product of The USA. How dare you?
EXCLUSIVE U.S. sees spike in contaminated Australian meat shipments - documents U.S. food safety officials have blocked a rising number of meat shipments from Australia since 2019 due to fecal contamination, straining trade relations between the two countries, according to documents reviewed by Reuters. reuters.com
U.S. Cattlemen’s Concerned About Contaminated Mexican Beef On Tuesday, the United States Cattlemen's Association (USCA) sent a letter to leaders at the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) and Food and Safety Inspection Service (FSIS) over concerns associated with contaminated Mexican cattle, lamb, poultry, and swine. According to Food Safety News, a total of 54 people... northernag.net
brandilwells
Posted - November 24, 2025 at 7:42 PM
Saved - December 11, 2025 at 9:39 PM

@brandilwells - King Arthur Fan

Our food is not food anymore. I don’t know how we’re still alive. Here’s how you can find out where your meat comes from. 👀 https://t.co/hnkeBeNPdg

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 summarizes the issue with prepackaged ground meat at multiple major retailers, including Kroger, Target, Walmart, Aldi, Food Lion, Piggly Wiggly, Whole Foods, and Fresh Thyme. He states that none of these packages tell you where the meat comes from, where it’s packaged, or what procedures were used to ensure safety. Behind the counter, employees say there’s information on the back to scan with your phone that leads to an FDA website. He claims the FDA website “could either be three d printed” and “could be a how do I put a cloned animal,” and that if that’s a problem, “well, TikTok, you need to check the the FDA website because it says it could be.” He urges caution, concluding with, “Let’s just say this, our food ain't food anymore.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I've been to Kroger. I've been to Target. I've been to Walmart. I've been to Aldi, Food Lion, Piggly Wiggly, Whole Foods, and Fresh Thyme. Every single one of them has a prepackaged ground meat that will not tell you, number one, where it comes from, number two, where it's packaged, and what kind of procedures that it goes through in order for us to know that it's safe. If you ask them behind the counter, they're gonna tell you there's a thing on the back, scan it with your phone, and it's gonna take you to a website that the FDA has put out there. And what it's gonna say is, it could either be three d printed, It could be a how do I put a cloned animal. Let's just put it out there. If that's a problem, well, TikTok, you need to check the the FDA website because it says it could be. Folks, god, I gotta be careful. Let's just say this, our food ain't food anymore.
annvandersteel
Posted - February 7, 2026 at 1:52 PM
Saved - February 8, 2026 at 6:25 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note the Florida House passed HB 433 amid opposition; SB 290 moves to the Senate Rules Committee on Feb 10, 2026. The bills expand the “food libel” law, silencing citizens, threatening journalists and health advocates, and letting corporations sue over truthful food-safety information. I urge lawmakers to strike Section 47 HB 433 and Section 48 SB 290. Free speech must stand. Show up, call Senate President Ben Albritton at 850-487-5229, email, and share.

@annvandersteel - Ann Vandersteel™️

🚨 FLORIDA EMERGENCY- GAG LAW MOVING FORWARD 🚨 The House PASSED HB 433 despite massive public opposition. This is the DEATH ☠️ of FREE SPEECH. Now SB 290 moves to the Senate Rules Committee. 📅 Feb 10, 2026 ⏰ 9–11 AM 📍 412 Knott Building, Tallahassee This bill EXPANDS Florida’s “food libel” law. It silences citizens. It threatens journalists, researchers, health advocates. It lets corporations sue people for telling the truth about food safety, pesticides, additives. Demand lawmakers STRIKE: ❌ Section 47 – HB 433 ❌ Section 48 – SB 290 Sales drop ≠ “harm.” Truth ≠ a lawsuit. Free speech must stand. SHOW UP. Even without testimony. Presence matters. CALL. EMAIL. SHARE. Senate President Ben Albritton (850) 487-5229 Silence helps this bill. Showing up stops it.

BrendonLeslie
Posted - February 7, 2026 at 6:23 PM
Saved - February 9, 2026 at 2:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Brendon Leslie mocks big accounts’ knowledge of Florida politics and endorses protections for real food/agriculture as a gag law. Ann Vandersteel responds with a sharp insult, accusing him of being illiterate or a paid Big AG shill and claiming the bill would financially ruin critics of the agribusiness industry, then asks which accusation is correct.

@BrendonLeslie - Brendon Leslie

It’s so funny watching these big accounts pretend they know anything about Florida politics If protecting REAL FOOD/agriculture is a “gag law” then sign me up!

@annvandersteel - Ann Vandersteel™️

🚨 FLORIDA EMERGENCY- GAG LAW MOVING FORWARD 🚨 The House PASSED HB 433 despite massive public opposition. This is the DEATH ☠️ of FREE SPEECH. Now SB 290 moves to the Senate Rules Committee. 📅 Feb 10, 2026 ⏰ 9–11 AM 📍 412 Knott Building, Tallahassee This bill EXPANDS Florida’s “food libel” law. It silences citizens. It threatens journalists, researchers, health advocates. It lets corporations sue people for telling the truth about food safety, pesticides, additives. Demand lawmakers STRIKE: ❌ Section 47 – HB 433 ❌ Section 48 – SB 290 Sales drop ≠ “harm.” Truth ≠ a lawsuit. Free speech must stand. SHOW UP. Even without testimony. Presence matters. CALL. EMAIL. SHARE. Senate President Ben Albritton (850) 487-5229 Silence helps this bill. Showing up stops it.

@annvandersteel - Ann Vandersteel™️

@BrendonLeslie You are either an illiterate moron or a paid Big AG shill. Anyone reading this post with the bill’s language clearly stating what would happen if you criticized a corporation in the AG industry, realizes they’d be lawfared to the poor house. So which is it?

NicHulscher
Posted - June 16, 2026 at 12:16 PM
Saved - June 16, 2026 at 3:04 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve learned that Minnesota (HF 3219), Tennessee (SB 1949), and Arizona (HB 2974) have introduced legislation classifying COVID-19 mRNA injections as weapons of mass destruction. I also see claims supported by other legislators and international bodies, plus a peer-reviewed study, that the FDA covered up the largest biomedical catastrophe in history. Criminal prosecutions are urged.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

THREE U.S. STATES INTRODUCED LEGISLATION CLASSIFYING COVID-19 mRNA INJECTIONS AS BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION 1. Minnesota Bill HF 3219 2. Tennessee Bill SB1949 3. Arizona Bill HB 2974 This is because mRNA shots have killed, injured, and disabled more people than 100+ Hiroshima nuclear attacks.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Three U.S. states have introduced legislation classifying and designating mRNA injections as biological agents and weapons of mass destruction. The states named are Minnesota (last year), Arizona (a few weeks ago), and Tennessee (just yesterday). The speaker says this is not the end of the developments, citing multiple international and organizational declarations. The Alliance of Indigenous Nations, described as an international governing body recognized by Canada on a nation-to-nation basis, declared the injections to be biological and technological weapons of mass destruction a few months earlier. The speaker also points to a peer-reviewed paper in the *Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons* identifying that the injections contain components that violate the Biological Weapons Convention. In addition, the World Council for Health is cited as having declared the shots to be biological weapons. The speaker concludes that, as these declarations accumulate, it is only a matter of time before the injections are outlawed. Regarding Arizona, the speaker says that if the bill goes through, possessing, distributing, or manufacturing these shots would constitute terrorism-related charges and life imprisonment. The speaker further asserts that the shots have killed, injured, and disabled millions of people worldwide, comparing their impact to “hundreds of Hiroshima nuclear attacks.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Three U.S. states have introduced legislation classifying and designating the mRNA injections as biological agents and weapons of mass destruction. The states include Minnesota was last year, and then a few weeks ago was Arizona, and then just yesterday was Tennessee. That's not the end of these developments. We have to remember the Alliance of Indigenous Nations which is an international governing body recognized by Canada on a nation-to-nation basis, they also declared these injections as biological and technological weapons of mass destruction a few months ago. And so we have that, and then we have a peer-reviewed paper in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons where we identify that these injections have components within them that violate the Biological Weapons Convention. And then we also have the World Council for Health. They have declared these shots as biological weapons. And so as all of these declarations mount, it's only a matter of time before these injections become outlawed. And yeah, you mentioned in Arizona, terrorism, yeah. If that bill goes through, possessing, distributing, or manufacturing these shots will constitute terrorism-related charges and life imprisonment. And rightfully so, given that these shots have killed, injured, and disabled millions upon millions of people across the globe, rivaling hundreds of Hiroshima nuclear attacks.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

COVID SHOTS KILLED MORE AMERICANS THAN WORLD WAR I, WORLD WAR II, THE VIETNAM WAR, AND THE IRAQ WAR COMBINED We now have internal documents proving the FDA COVERED-UP the LARGEST biomedical catastrophe in history. Criminal prosecutions are urgently warranted.

Video Transcript AI Summary
American COVID-19 vaccine deaths are described as ranging from about 470,000 from Pfizer alone up to 840,000 American deaths from COVID-19 vaccines. It is further stated that this death toll rivals the combined American soldier death toll of World War I, World War II, Vietnam, and the Iraq War.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: American COVID-19 vaccine deaths. It ranges from about 470,000 from Pfizer alone up to 840,000 American deaths from the COVID-19 vaccines. We have to remember that that is rivaling the American soldier death toll of World War I, World War II, Vietnam, and the Iraq War combined.

@SenRonJohnson - Senator Ron Johnson

This is a scandal WAY bigger than Watergate. @CNN, @MSNOWNews, @NBCNews, @ABC, @PBS — it's past time to cover this. People died from the COVID shot because the government lied to them, yet the legacy media refuses to report on this story.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 asks what justice looks like and what the next steps should be for families affected. Speaker 0 says the first step is to “expose it,” thanking News Nation for covering the issue. He contrasts this with what he describes as a lack of coverage from major networks such as ABC, NBC, PBS, CNN, and only one interview on CBS’ streaming service with Major Garrett. He calls it “the biggest government scandal” of his lifetime, stating that people died because they were not given information and that people were permanently disabled because the government withheld information the American people had a right to know. He says he is not giving up, will begin interviewing those affected, and that those responsible “better not lie” as they work to uncover what he calls the entire plot. Speaker 1 asks whether Speaker 0 believes it is bigger than the biggest scandal of his time and bigger than Watergate. Speaker 0 responds that, unlike Watergate, “nobody died” in Watergate, while he claims “tens of thousands of people died after March 1st” from what he calls a “COVID injection.” He adds that children died and parents were convinced by “these lies” to give the injection to their children so it wouldn’t infect their grandchildren. He says they now know the injection didn’t prevent transmission, and he argues that the lies must be revealed and the people behind them must be exposed.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 1: What does justice look like? What's next steps for you and all these families who have been affected by this? Speaker 0: First of all, we need to expose it. Listen, I appreciate News Nation covering this. The major networks, you know, ABC, NBC, PBS, CNN. CBS had Major Garrett do one interview with me on their streaming service, but it is just radio silence. I mean, this is the biggest government scandal of my lifetime because people died because they weren't given this information. They were permanently disabled because the government withheld information the American people had a right to know. So I appreciate you covering this. Stay tuned. I'm not giving up on this. We're going to start interviewing these people. They better not lie to us. We're going to uncover this entire plot. Speaker 1: You think this is bigger than the biggest scandal of your time, bigger than Watergate? Speaker 0: I mean, nobody died in Watergate. Tens of thousands of people died after March 1st from that COVID injection. Children died. Parents were convinced by these lies to give the injection to their children so it wouldn't infect their grandchildren. Now we know the injection didn't prevent transmission. So the lies told, we need to reveal those lies and these people need to be exposed.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

There are now multiple legislators, international bodies, and peer-reviewed scientific publications declaring that mRNA injections constitute biological or technological weapons of mass destruction: - Tennessee Bill SB1949 (Sen. Janice Bowling): https://wapp.capitol.tn.gov/apps/BillInfo/Default?BillNumber=SB1949&GA=114 - Arizona Bill HB 2974 (Rep. Rachel Keshel): https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/57leg/2R/bills/HB2974P.pdf - Minnesota Bill HF 3219 (Rep. Shane Mekeland): https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bills/94/2025/0/HF/3219/versions/0/ - Alliance of Indigenous Nations (recognized by Canada on a Nation-to-Nation basis): https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-worlds-first-international - Our peer-reviewed study in the American Journal of Physicians and Surgeons: https://jpands.org/vol30no3/zywiec.pdf It’s only a matter of time before these dangerous products are outlawed.

View Full Interactive Feed