reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@Bruce_LeVell - Bruce LeVell
Alvin Leonard Bragg Jr.should be disbarred immediately for weaponizing the New York County District Attorney’s office for political reasons against @realDonaldTrump @NEWSMAX #TrumpWitchHunts
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the importance of following the facts in a high-profile case. They mention concerns about bias and conflicts of interest, particularly regarding the funding of certain officials. They question the motives behind statements made by these officials and suggest that the case should be moved to a different jurisdiction for a fair judgment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To go wherever the facts take me and to inherit that case. And I think, you know, it'd be hard to argue with the fact that that's that'd be the most important, most high profile case, and I've seen him up front and seen the lawlessness that he could do. Bruce, there you go. That's the number one issue to him.
Speaker 1: Not a lawyer, but lawyers in my family. But listen. That in itself is a conflict of interest, and that should that right there should be shown that that's biasness. And, you know, really, real quick, I'm writing I'm actually in the middle of writing this cool op ed about where this money is coming from with Bragg, Laticia James, Fannie Willis that we have down here in Atlanta, out in, in California. I'm I'm actually following the money as you might say.
You know, we talked about Source who's been funding, Laticia James and all these other ones. And you saw her to your point, Allison, how she literally campaigned, I wanna get Trump. I wanna get Trump. Only Trump. I'm like, what in the world is going on with this?
Right. So so there's all types of conflicts of interest and appearance of impropriety as it relates to their statements as sworn elect the sworn officials to uphold the law. So that in itself should, first of all, strike all of this down, let alone move the venue to another jurisdiction that that somebody could actually judge this
@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer
WATCH: Letitia James is a communist tool of the Deep State who is using her position to carry out a vendetta against President Trump and his family. The video evidence is undeniable. She is definitely the most corrupt Attorney General in the entire country. #Trump2024
Video Transcript AI Summary
The president accused me of conducting a political witch hunt and having a personal vendetta against him. He also claimed that I campaigned against him, which is not true. As for the current president, I consider him illegitimate and not my president. We need to prepare to mobilize, agitate, and irritate this illegitimate president. I will treat him with the same lack of respect that he showed President Obama.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The president of the United States has complained that I'm engaging in some sort of political witch hunt, that I've got some personal vendetta against him, that I campaigned against him. That is not true.
Speaker 1: It's imminent president for the White House. That president, because he's not my president, he's an illegitimate president, These are numbered. These are numbered. We've got to get ready to mobilize, and we've got to get ready to agitate and irritate I legitimate president Yes. I'm going to give you the same level of respect that you gave to president Obama, and that is Absolutely no respect at all.
@EndWokeness - End Wokeness
Trump was right. AG Letitia James is a racist. Listen to this deranged rant: https://t.co/suAsveLvNp
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker urges people to resist an administration that is predominantly male, white, and outdated. They emphasize that they will not remain silent or disappear.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Stand up to an an administration which is too male, too pale, and too Too male, Too pale and too stale. Too male, too pale, and too stale. And we will not go away silently. We will not be
@EndWokeness - End Wokeness
This brutal 1-minute takedown of New York AG Letitia James is disqualifying. Look at the hatred she has for Trump, men, and white people. Is this really an impartial good-faith actor? The entire case should be thrown out. https://t.co/P1PQ0I6DFd
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 is upset about being called venomous, disgraceful, and radical. Speaker 1 mentions fighting back against Trumpism in New York City and criticizes the Supreme Court seat being stolen. They also refer to the president and a member of the Supreme Court as illegitimate. Speaker 1 acknowledges that the president is crazy and losing control, but encourages unity. Speaker 0 mentions being called a racist. Speaker 1 emphasizes the need to stand up against a male, pale, and stale system. The transcript ends with Speaker 0 expressing gratitude.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He's called me venomous.
Speaker 1: We will fight back to your attempt to bring Trumpism to New York City.
Speaker 0: He's called me disgraceful. Of the president that
Speaker 1: they stole the Supreme Court seat, an illegitimate president, and dis an illegitimate member of the United States Supreme Court.
Speaker 0: He's called me radical.
Speaker 1: Listen. Yes. We know he's crazy. Yes. We to We know he doesn't have a sound mind.
We know he's out of control. We know he's losing it. We know to These days are tempered and we will come together.
Speaker 0: He's called me a racist.
Speaker 1: We've gotta stand up to an desecration, which is too male, too pale, and too stale. To Jumail, Jumail, and Jusail. Jumail, Jumail, and Jusail.
Speaker 0: Thank you.
@Chicago1Ray - Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
Letitia James doesn't like when her corruption is made public, so do not (RT) this https://t.co/7EowyCJ4G7
reSee.it AI Summary
Ian Engoron, son of Leftist judge Arthur Engoron, was spotted alongside NY Attorney General @TishJames at her anti-Trump protest. Matching their geolocation on his cell phone could reveal a major conflict of interest.
@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer
Gee…. Sure looks like Ian Engoron, the son of Leftist judge Arthur Engoron is the man next to NY Attorney General @TishJames at her anti-Trump protest. Doesn’t it? I’ve been watching. Sure would be a shame if someone matched the geolocation on his cell phone that pinged him there with her that day…. Major conflict of interest…
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
The New York AG Letitia James is seeking $250 million in ‘damages' when there is NO victim in this fraud case and she is also seeking to ban Trump and his sons from operating any businesses in New York. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/11/deutsche-bank-may-have-just-destroyed-letitia-james/ #LeticiaJamesNeedsToBeInvestigated #TheWitchHuntIsElectionInterference
Deutsche Bank May Have Just Destroyed Letitia James' Civil Fraud Case Against Trump | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila
Deutsche Bank might have just blown up Letitia James’s civil fraud case against President Trump.
thegatewaypundit.com
@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸
@historyinmemes Meanwhile, the corrupt New York AG Leticia James continues in her unlawful effort to destroy our former President, Donald J. Trump and his family; interfering in an election and eliminating the American People's Constitutional right to choose our President of the United States. https://t.co/mDcZRXV5Lr
Video Transcript AI Summary
I will sue Donald Trump as the next attorney general because he is an illegitimate president. I believe he should be charged with obstructing justice and can be indicted for criminal offenses. I will challenge him and defend your rights every day. The days of Donald Trump are coming to an end.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And what would you say to people who say, oh, I'm not gonna bother to register to vote because my voice doesn't make a difference, or I'm just one person. I say one I say one name, Donald Trump. That should motivate you. Put up your ass
Speaker 1: Will you
Speaker 0: will you sue him for us? Oh, we're gonna definitely assume. We're gonna be a real pain in the ass. He's gotta know my name personally. I love it.
Speaker 1: Makes a mom
Speaker 0: He probably does already.
Speaker 1: This illegitimate president office. He sits on the White House. That president, Because he's not my president, he's an illegitimate president. And days are numbered. And days are numbered.
Speaker 0: We've gotta get ready to mobilize,
Speaker 1: and we've gotta get ready to agitate and irritate until victory is won, But more importantly, until truth is defeated. As the next attorney general, I see the law As a sworn and as a shield to protect those who are vulnerable because no one is above the law Including this illegitimate president. True. And so I look forward I look forward To go into the office of attorney general every day, suing him, defending your rights, And then going home.
Speaker 0: And at the eye of the storm is Donald Trump, ripping families apart, threatening women's most basic rights, I'm running for attorney general because I will never be afraid to challenge this illegitimate president. He should be charged with obstructing justice. I believe that the president of these United States can be indicted for criminal offenses. It's important that everyone understand that the days of Donald Trump are coming to an end. Will you sue him for us?
Oh, we're gonna definitely sue him. We're gonna be a real pain in the ass. He's gotta know my name personally. I love it. He probably does already.
@SULLY10X - SULLY🇺🇸
Trump is right! Letitia James is venomous, radical and disgraceful. https://t.co/yZihShRmpZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
The New York attorney general and Manhattan district attorney are teaming up to investigate the former president once he loses his immunity. They plan to sue him and challenge his legitimacy. They want to follow his money and bring him down. While the outcomes are uncertain, they have a good track record. The former president has insulted them, but they are determined to fight back and resist his influence. They believe he is crazy, losing control, and his days are numbered.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can resist this thing.
Speaker 1: When he leaves office as a private citizen, he will no longer have presidential immunity. Can we actually get him?
Speaker 0: The New York attorney general has joined the Manhattan district attorney The day of this president That's the right number.
Speaker 1: Claims that you campaigned on a get Trump agenda.
Speaker 0: And we will rise up together, and we will Resist this president. Bring him down.
Speaker 2: Stay tuned. Will you sue him for us? Oh, we're gonna definitely assume
Speaker 1: we're gonna be a real pain in the ass.
Speaker 2: I will never be afraid To challenge this illegitimate president. We need to focus on Donald Trump. We need to follow his money. What is fueling my soul right now is Trump. This illegitimate president, I refer to going into the office of attorney general
Speaker 0: every day, suing him, and then going home. On our
Speaker 1: show. Oh, keep going. This is my new ringtone. Between the attorney general's civil investigations of Trump and the Manhattan DA's criminal investigation, Things could get really legal. I don't wanna get too excited, but a girl can dream, can't she?
I know you can't tell me anything specific about any of the lawsuits, but can I just, like, sit here and use my imagination to picture the outcomes that I desire?
Speaker 0: The detail.
Speaker 1: And while there's no way to predict where these lawsuits might lead, the Attorney general's office has a pretty good track.
Speaker 0: He's called me venomous. We will fight back to your attempt to bring Trumpism to New York City.
Speaker 2: He's called me disgraceful.
Speaker 0: An illegitimate president and an illegitimate member of the United States Supreme Court. He's Called me radical. Listen. Yes. We know he's crazy.
Yes. We know he doesn't have a sound mind. We know he's out of control. We know he's losing it. We know his days are numbered, and we will come
@lakemonstercl1 - 🇺🇸Steve2A🇺🇸God🇺🇸Family🇺🇸Country🇺🇸
These judges and DAs are not installed because they’re smart, they’re there because they’re corrupt and they’re bought and paid for! What’s their job, well it’s to get Trump! https://t.co/J0TMAehr94
Video Transcript AI Summary
The judge questioned if $175 million would be available in cash, even if its value changed. The speaker found it absurd, as the money was in a secure account. The judge's lack of understanding was frustrating, leading to a disappointing experience in court. Later, the speaker attended a criminal hearing, which was also deemed disgraceful.
Translation: The judge's lack of understanding about cash and secure accounts led to a frustrating court experience for the speaker. The subsequent criminal hearing was also disappointing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Understanding is that the judge in the case said, well, what happens if the 175,000,000 isn't there at the time it would be necessary to make that payment? And the Trump people said, oh, that would be in cash, sir. He said, but what if it's not worth the same amount of money? That would be in cash, sir. A 175,000,000 is a 175,000,000.
Please tell me that didn't happen. Did that happen in that courtroom? They're laughing. So I guess the answer is yes.
Speaker 1: Oh, you you have no idea. We had the money in a Charles Schwab money market account, and the judge legitimately said with a straight face with his little team, hey, I I don't think this is secure money because something could happen to the market and it could go below a 175,000,000. To tell you how hard it was for me to keep my face straight in that moment, Sean, you can't make it up. This case should have been in the commercial division. It had no business being in the civil division in front of a judge that today was trying to invalidate any bond and doesn't understand that cash is green.
And when cash is held by Charles Schwab, they can't go trade it, they can't move it around. It's not a stock market, but he didn't understand basics. It was one of those moments that I truly didn't feel I could have after 11 weeks in front of this judge, but it just can't stop. He can't stop surprising me. Right.
Speaker 0: By the way,
Speaker 1: it was a disgrace to be honest. And then after that, I went to the criminal hearing, which is another disgrace.
@RealCherokeeOwl - TheRealCherokeeOwl
Biden’s DOJ Wants Steve Bannon In Jail https://t.co/bzF18yUnqI
Video Transcript AI Summary
Biden's DOJ is pushing to imprison Steve Bannon for contempt related to the January 6th committee, similar to Peter Navarro. Navarro is fighting his sentence, claiming he's too notorious for interviews in prison. This political move raises questions about silencing voices like Bannon's before the November election. Meanwhile, the House Oversight Committee plans to hold AG Garland in contempt for withholding Biden's interview tapes. Author Daniel Greenfield discusses fighting against the left in his book, "Domestic Enemies, The Founding Father's Fight Against the Left," emphasizing the need to confront leftist ideologies seeking total power and control.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Biden's DOJ is pushing hard today to lock up Steve Bannon, one of the biggest and most influential voices in the MAGA movement. Same as former Trump White House adviser Peter Navarro, Bannon was likewise convicted of a contempt charge for not complying with the illicit January 6th congressional committee. And like Navarro, he's been fighting to stay out of prison after being sentenced back in October of 2022 to 4 months behind bars. Navarro is still fighting for his appeal. Now the Miami prison system is claiming that Navarro is just too notorious to allow anyone, even Florida congressman Matt Gaetz, to interview him while he's behind bars, something which the congressman is now having investigated because even literal mob bosses have conducted interviews from behind bars.
So this is entirely political. Are they trying to do the same thing to Bannon right before November? Lock him up and shut him up? Biden's prosecutors were saying that since an appeals court upheld his conviction last week, that he is out of excuses and must be put away. What precedent does that send for?
President Trump, who's facing his own contempt fight because of the unconstitutional gag order placed on him. See how all of this works. Navarro's behind bars. Bannon could be right there behind him, and then even maybe Trump. All while Eric Holder got barely a slap on the wrist for his contempt of congress, and all that talk of holding Hunter Biden in contempt for refusing to testify before congress has long fizzled out.
The House Oversight Committee is now announcing their own contempt of congress vote for Biden's attorney general Merrick Garland, who is still refusing to hand over the audio tapes of special counsel Robert Hurst's interview with Joe Biden over the classified documents case. A markup for the resolution to hold Garland in contempt of court is scheduled for this Thursday. But unless we see Garland or Hunter or any other top Democrat rotting behind bars like Navarro is, not allowed to speak to anyone, then I really don't wanna hear about it. Republicans cry about double standards and then do absolutely nothing to fix it. Even worse, they keep funding these very entities which are weaponized against us.
So how do we defeat the left? Well, our first guest tonight has a new book explaining just that. It's titled Domestic Enemies, The Founding Father's Fight Against the Left. Joining us now to discuss is the author of this book, Daniel Greenfield, a Shulman journalism fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. Daniel, thanks for being here tonight.
Speaker 1: Thank you.
Speaker 0: So given the lawfare that we see on display, do do you think your new book comes at a very prescient time?
Speaker 1: I think it's an important message. And one of the part of the message is exactly what you were discussing right now, which is that the founding fathers were not afraid to hit hard. They were not afraid to go after the left. George Washington becomes the only president, as far as I know, to lead troops in the field when the left tries one of its little revolutions. We impose something called the Alien and Sedition Act to criminalize foreign radicals backed by globalist governments coming to America to pursue radical fundamental transformation.
Those are all things that would horrify and shock most Republicans, and yet the founding fathers found them to be useful tools when facing enemies from the left.
Speaker 0: When it comes to the left, obviously, everyone has a different definition of exactly what they mean by the left. So for the purposes of your book, how do you define what the left is?
Speaker 1: Well, the left rebrands. It constantly has new names. For a while, it was calling itself woke. Now we'll never use the term woke again because it became negative. But the law believes in a few very simple things.
It believes that it has a destiny to seize control over all the machinery of government and overall society to impose equality. And this goes back, you know, I discuss in my book, really, the French Revolution, which in complete opposition to the American Revolution was based on enforcing total equality, and total equality also means total attorneys. So whatever the left calls itself at any given time, it wants this condition. It wants total power and total attorneys.
reSee.it AI Summary
The legal system in America is undergoing a significant change, with the Left's attempts to prosecute Donald Trump and now Steve Bannon. It is crucial for Congress to prioritize defending against election interference and question the validity of the J6 committee's actions.
@RepMattGaetz - Rep. Matt Gaetz
We are watching the death of America’s legal system as we know it. The Left has not been able to deter Donald Trump with the prosecution in New York, and they are now trying to demoralize our movement by putting Steve Bannon behind bars. Congress must immediately advance its election interference defense and declare the actions of the J6 committee INVALID!
Video Transcript AI Summary
Congressman Matt Gaetz discusses the recent sentencing of Steve Bannon for contempt of Congress and expresses his frustration with what he perceives as a biased and unfair legal system. He argues that the current administration is using the legal system to target political opponents and interfere with elections. Gaetz suggests that action needs to be taken to protect individual liberties and restore the integrity of the justice system. He also emphasizes the importance of organizing, coordinating, and filling leadership positions within the Republican Party to bring about change. Gaetz believes that more people are aligning with conservative ideas and that it is crucial to fight for these principles.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, a judge ordered Stephen k Bannon to report to prison on July 1st for a 4 month sentence for contempt of congress, which means he will be incarcerated for the duration of the election. Hard to imagine a better guest to react to all of that. So much to discuss. We're gonna have him on for 2 full segments. No monologue to open the show today because we don't have the time.
Florida's very own firebrand, congressman Matt Gaetz. Welcome back to America First.
Speaker 1: Well, thanks so much for having me, Seth. But we we are seeing something in our country right now that is the death of the legal system, the death of the justice system. And it's it's infuriating, and it's also very sad to me personally. I've given my life to the law. I've studied the law.
I've practiced law. I've made law. And now to see, the world look at America not as a stable system of fairness, but as a system where if you challenge the regime, it will it will manufacture a basis to deprive you of your liberty. And let's think about what actually happened with Steve Bannon. Congress had a runaway committee.
A committee established outside of even the resolution authorizing it. Because the resolution authorizing it demanded a minority ranking member chosen by the minority party like every other committee in the entire United States Congress. And yet this committee broke bad. It went rogue. And in doing so, engaged in the type of conduct that we we really haven't seen from other legislative bodies.
Bannon had an obligation according to his lawyer, and keep in mind, Steven Bannon is not a lawyer. And his lawyer tells him that president Trump has raised executive privilege and as a matter of law, you cannot go testify, until the the judge or or some other tribunal releases you from that executive privilege obligation. And so this
Speaker 0: Meaning let's just be let's make it clear for those who don't understand the law. Executive privilege because he worked for the president who enjoys executive privilege.
Speaker 1: Great points that executive privilege was not a claim asserted by Steve Bannon. It was asserted by Donald Trump. Yeah. And it found Steve Bannon. And so in criminal law, there is a requirement in in any criminal law that you know you're breaking the law, that you have an intent to commit an illegal act.
If you if you believe that you are allowing the legal process to answer a question that has never before been answered, then that's never a basis to go lock somebody up. And yet here, I think the timing is performative. And look, you know, there is a lot of groundswell right now for Trump. We're not seeing the polling numbers if you can believe it even getting better in some of these swing states. And even Bannon is one of the people we rely upon to marshal, intellectual energy, political energy, financial energy for the campaign.
And so, you know, they they haven't been able to blame Donald Trump in any way despite these crazy efforts. And so now they're trying to deprive Trump of even access to the people like a Peter Navarro, like a Steven Bannon, maybe even like a Walt Nada, a a patriotic American who served in our marine corps who's now the subject of criminal process. You see, that that is how they're trying to use this. And I I believe that Congress ought to immediately step in and and define election interference as as a feature of criminal law. It's never been done before, so we've never had to write those laws before.
But I think we actually have to go into the statutes and say, if you're using criminal law on this way against the candidate for federal office, you are engaged in election interference, and we have a federal basis to stop you from doing so.
Speaker 0: We're talking to congressman Matt Gaetz, Florida's 1st congressional district representative at rep. Mattgateson twittergates.house.gov, author of Firebrand and the Firebrand podcast. So much to discuss, but but I I I gotta, you know, pull out a little bit, open the aperture here. This isn't about Steve. It's not even just about president Trump or election interference.
Can we look at the broader phenomena when we have 3 associates of president Trump who have been charged in Wisconsin a few days ago? When we see what's happening to president Trump's lawyers, not just as valid, and when we see, for example, a 75 year old grandmother get a custodial sentence on Tuesday because she prayed at a Planned Parenthood abortion clinic. Matt, this this is about anybody who disagrees with the Democrat party and their ideology. Is it not?
Speaker 1: No. They have invested a tremendous amount of time and political resources into getting these Soros DAs in office, into having people who are involved in, you know, whether it's the election infrastructure, the judicial infrastructure, the prosecutorial infrastructure. They've seized those institutions and they have converted them from what what were at times vaulted institutions in American life to now just, very diminished tools of politics. And and the problem is if we just complain about it and don't take, you know, some some action to constrain that authority and constrain the, the real tyrannical approach that's been taken, then I fear like you say, we're all at risk of losing some degree of liberty. I mean, if they would've been successful getting Trump off the ballot, what they're really trying to do is attack your option in selecting your own leader.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: And in getting Bannon off the board and behind bars, they're trying to make the intellectual apparatus, the people who are out there in the Republican executive committee knock on the doors, making the calls. They're trying to make those folks, I think, demoralized with with the incarceration of Bannon. But I think just like the phony felony prosecution in New York backfired, I actually think this is gonna backfire too. What do you think, sir?
Speaker 0: Well, we'll talk about it in the next segment. We've got 30 seconds left here. Half a dozen of, the Republican senators have said, that's it. They're on strike. They're not gonna collaborate with the Democrats.
They're not confirming any appointees for the next 5 months until the election. Should something like that happen under the leadership of Mike Johnson amongst the house?
Speaker 1: Well, here's what I've recommended, that we we immediately advance our election interference defense, and that relates to the Trump prosecutions, the Bannon prosecutions, we immediately do that, that we, that we cure any perceived contempt of the congress by declaring the actions of the January 6th committee invalid. We can do that without the senate. We can do that without the white dust. We can do that right now to save Steve Bannon. And I have been communicating with the speaker about it.
Speaker 0: Alright. We'll break that down in the next segment and then talk about, some other things that, we must dissect with the representative of Florida's 1st congressional district, Matt Gaetz. Follow him at rep Matt Gaetz, host of the Firebrand podcast, author of the book Firebrand gates.house.gov. Continue to push all of
Speaker 2: these conspiracy theories. We heard today as Jim Jordan, Matt Gaetz, and others tried to suggest that the justice department or the president was behind the Matt Manhattan DA's prosecution. They understand how the court system works. They know that the federal system is completely separate and distinct from a local prosecutor's office like that in Manhattan. You know, Matt Gaetz, for for his own part, has all too much experience in the criminal justice system being the subject of a sex trafficking case.
Speaker 0: Now I know you guys enjoy this kind of Teflon coated Kevlar immunity when you're talking on the floor of congress, but he wasn't there. He was on Anderson Cooper's show on CNN. Can't you just sue that scumbag into the ground, congressman Gaetz?
Speaker 1: Listen. You we listen. We've seen the justice system so tortured. I don't I don't know if I wanna interact with it any more than necessary. I could tell you that, you know, Adam Schiff, saw Merrick Garland squirm when asked basic questions about whether or not he would produce his correspondence with
Speaker 0: Oh, stop. Funny feelings. Stop. Stop. Stop.
Stop. We have that clip absolutely sterling. I wanna play this right now, and then we will continue. Do you have that available, Eric? Hit it.
Speaker 3: Communicating with these state and local prosecutions against Trump, you can clear it all up for us right now. Will the Department of Justice provide to the committee all documents, all correspondence between the department and Alvin Bragg's office and Fonnie Willesaw's office and Leticia James' office?
Speaker 4: The offices you're referring to are independent offices of state
Speaker 3: I get that. I get that. State? The question is whether or not you will provide all of your documents and correspondence.
Speaker 4: Again, We do not control those offices. They make their
Speaker 3: own decisions. Communicate with them, not whether you control them. Do you communicate with them, and will you provide those
Speaker 4: You make a request. We'll refer it to our office of legislative affairs. But but,
Speaker 2: I understand
Speaker 0: I know he's not an impressive person. He's the meat puppet for the real attorney general, Lisa Monaco. But congressman Gaetz, why can't Merrick Garland answer the question about communications between DOJ and, Bragg's office in Manhattan?
Speaker 1: It seems pretty straightforward. I guess that's why Adam Schiff was so hot under the collar wanting to criticize me because it's just basic questions. And Merrick Garland only feeds into people's concern about political capture at the justice department when he's so opaque about this. If if they were independent, he would have just said, look, mister Gates. They're independent offices.
We haven't communicated with them. Whatever they've done, they've done of their own volition. If he'd have said that, we'd moved on to another question. But the fact that they you know what? There is an arrogance that they can sit there and provide these non responses.
And you know where I think that arrogance comes from? The fact that we still fund them. Because they sit there and they give us these these nonsense responses, and then we just turn around and say, okay. Well, gosh. We didn't wanna shut the government down, so here's all the money you need, FBI,
Speaker 0: So hang on. So stop it. This is fast. This is really important because you're the guy in in the trenches. We've been told by, you know, leadership, republican leader, oh, well, we can't, you know, just slice off, Jack Smith's budget or the DOJ FBI budget.
We've got these omnibus continuing resolutions, and it's just impossible. So that's that's bravo Sierra, congressman.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Why is that impossible? Are willing to shut down the entire government because you wanna continue with this activity that, like, 2 thirds of the country sees is just brazenly political, then that'll be on them. Can can you imagine how bad Joe Biden will look if people don't get their Social Security checks because he's so busy trying to jail his political opponents?
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: And you that's how you use leverage. But the problem is we have too many Republicans who are gutless, and that is why these primary elections are so important. We need fighters. We need people who, will will really see the problem for what it is. America is in a state of grave decline right now, and I take no joy in saying that.
But we have to recognize it, and we have to reverse that decline. And I think it starts with trying to restore the article 3 courts and our justice system as something that is non biased, not something that is weaponized against people Joe Biden doesn't like.
Speaker 0: Alright. So here's here's the big question. You know, you are one of the handful of fighters. You're talking to about 3 and a half million people, you know, much bigger than most TV shows. What what is your message to those who believe in America?
What should they be doing for the next 5 months?
Speaker 1: Well, there are more of us than there are of the America last people. That's the good news. And so we have to organize. We have to coordinate. Remember, it was Steve Bannon who said show up to your local Republican executive committee.
If there's an empty position, fill it. If there's a leadership opportunity, run for it. We we have to do more than just complain. We asked you, we have to get back to seizing the institutions that used to be, really vaulted in America so that we can reconvert them to their original purpose of serving the nation, not not serving the whims of a dying regime. And if people do that, I I I do believe we will be on the march.
You look at what's going on with working class people in the politics. We've mostly been talking policy. But if you just look at the polling right now, working class, African Americans, Hispanics, people of of all kinds are realigning around our ideas because they're tired of being embarrassed globally. They're tired of being in all these wars. They're tired of the borders being open, streets being unsafe, while Joe Biden tries to tell you that the 3rd grade teacher gets to pick the gender of your kid.
Yeah. No nobody wants that world, and that's why people are coming our way.
Speaker 0: Can we continue this discussion tomorrow night when I'm hosting for Rob Schmidt on Newsmax, congressman?
Speaker 1: But, Seb, I the the only the the only hesitation is that I I love to watch you when you're the host on Newsmax. But let's do it. Let's do it. Let's kick off, let's kick off the 7 PM, but I I love, I love getting your take on on that network and many others because right now, there's not a lot of people that really get what we're facing. They think we can go back to the Marquis of Queensbury rules of engagement.
And you and I know we need the fighters, and we need them on the front lines now in the battle of ideas.
Speaker 0: Well, there's a slot open at 8 o'clock. I think maybe I should have a word with mister Ruddy in the meantime. Follow this man. Listen to his podcast. Get the book 5 brand and follow him at rep Matt Gates.
And give me a follow well as well.
@FFT1776 - Sheri™
Appellate court grilling Letitia James. Can Letitia be criminally charged? https://t.co/ORLvVzNMSY
Video Transcript AI Summary
Judith Foehl, representing the New York Attorney General's Office, argues the defendants repeatedly violated the law.
Defense questions if there's precedent for the Attorney General suing under Executive Law 6312 to overturn a private business deal between sophisticated partners. They highlight the alleged victim's ability and obligation to conduct due diligence, written disclaimers advising independent due diligence, and the subjective nature of property valuations. The defense also notes the alleged victim never complained about fraud or transactional losses. They claim cited cases always involve consumer protection or market protection. The defense adds there was little to no impact on the public marketplace.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: May it please the court, Judith Foehl for the New York Attorney General's Office. All of the defendants repeatedly violated Judith Foehl,
Speaker 1: can you identify any previous case which the attorney general sued under Executive Law 6312 to upset a private business transaction that was between equally sophisticated partners where the supposed victim had the ability and legal obligation to discover the allegedly misrepresented matters by conducting its own due diligence where the supposed wrongdoer advised the supposed victim through written disclaimers to conduct its own due diligence and to draw its own conclusions where the alleged misrepresentation almost entirely concerned inherently subjective valuations of properties and businesses and where the victim never complained about any fraud in the transactional losses from it because I've gone through the cases which you've cited, and all of them always involve the consumer protection aspect. It involved protection of the market.
Speaker 0: Several responses. And I want
Speaker 1: to add to his question and little to no impact on the public marketplace.
Speaker 0: Well, maybe I'll take that first
@TheLeoTerrell - LeoTerrell
This woman is a fool. Trump needs to declare war against James and New York Democrats!
@thenewpatriot15 - 🇺🇸 Joel Churchill 🌈
AG Letitia James is absolutely an evil b*tch. Disgusting speech saying she’s ready to fight Donald J. Trump https://t.co/aHSightlaJ
@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
Breaking 🚨 Letitia James comes unglued with a bazaar rant on Trumps victory just now " We're ready to respond to any attempt to roll back our rights," (RP) if you want Trump to ask his AG to look into how Letitia James has ($15M) in the bank while making ($103K) annually https://t.co/XZR1PcMCl4
Video Transcript AI Summary
We have thoroughly analyzed potential challenges to our rights and developed contingency plans. No matter what the next administration attempts, we are prepared to counter any attacks or funding cuts affecting New York. Despite national events, we will remain steadfast against injustice and protect our most vulnerable and marginalized communities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To respond to any attempt to roll back our rights. So here we are. We studied their platforms. We've identified certain possibilities, fact patterns. We've created contingency plans.
So no matter what the next administration throws at us, we're ready. We're ready to respond to their attacks. We're ready to respond to any attempts to cut or eliminate any funding to the great state of New York as the governor outlined. So so despite what has happened on the national stage, we will continue to stand tall in the face of injustice, revenge, or retribution. We will continue to protect and our most vulnerable and marginalized amongst us.
reSee.it AI Summary
I see NY AG Letitia James ramping up her conflict with the incoming Trump administration, stating her office is ready to defend the rule of law. She emphasizes her commitment to this responsibility, while I believe Trump will be the one pushing back against her political tactics.
@WesternLensman - Western Lensman
NEW: Grandstanding NY AG Letitia James agitates for conflict with the incoming Trump admin: “My office has been preparing for several months. We are prepared to fight back once again. It is my job to protect and defend the rule of law. I will not shrink from that responsibility.” James has built her entire hate-fueled career on Get Trump. Trump is the one who'll now be fighting back against her corrupt political lawfare.
Video Transcript AI Summary
We did not anticipate this outcome, but we are ready to respond. My office has been preparing for months, as we have faced similar challenges before. We will use the rule of law to fight back, as it is my duty as attorney general to protect the rights of New Yorkers and uphold the law. I will not shy away from this responsibility.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We did not expect this result, but we are prepared to respond to this result. And my office has been preparing for several months because we've been here before. We faced this challenge before, and we use the rule of law to fight back. And we are prepared to fight back once again. Because as the attorney general of this great state, it is my job to protect and defend the rights of New Yorkers and the rule of law.
And I will not shrink from that responsibility.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
🚨Trump's lawyer Mike Davis issues dark warning to NY AG Letitia James: "I dare you to try to continue your lawfare against President Trump... listen here, sweetheart, we're not messing around this time and we will put your fatass in prison for conspiracy against rights." https://t.co/FfGGxzsaq6
Video Transcript AI Summary
Big Tish James, the New York attorney general, should reconsider her actions against President Trump during his second term. There will be serious consequences for any attempts to violate his or any American's constitutional rights. This administration is not the same as before, and any illegal activities, such as rigging elections or fraudulent voting, will not be tolerated. The team supporting Trump is determined and prepared to take action against any wrongdoing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me just say this to big Tish James, the New York attorney general. I dare you. I dare you to try to continue your lawfare against president Trump in his second term Because listen here, sweetheart. We're not messing around this time, and we will put your fat ass in prison for conspiracy against rights. And I promise you that.
So think long and hard before you wanna violate president Trump's constitutional rights or any other Americans' constitutional rights. We it's not gonna happen again.
Speaker 1: We've been warning people on the show, Mike. This isn't the same Trump administration. Stop messing around. Don't rig elections. Don't illegally vote.
Don't try the funny business because we know the team this time, and they are not effing around.
@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸
Fox News reports Attorney General Pam Bondi is establishing a "Weaponization Working Group" to review politically motivated investigations including Special Counsel Jack Smith, NY DA Alvin Bragg, NY AG Leticia James, and the prosecution of J6ers. Let's go.
@w_terrence - Terrence K. Williams
BOOOOOOM!!!!!! LETS GOOOOOO!!!!! Grab your popcorn & add some extra butter. Trumps AG Pam Bondi is going after Letitia James! The Tables are finally Turning! I’m loving it https://t.co/kIeGlIqg4n
Video Transcript AI Summary
Yo, Pam Bondi is going after Leticia James, and I'm all for it. James is corrupt and has been wrongfully targeting Trump. Everything she's doing in New York is practically illegal. I'm happy someone is finally going after her. Democrats always say no one is above the law, so let's hold her to that standard. James is one of the most corrupt individuals in politics and government. She literally ran just to take Trump down for no reason. She literally said she was running to take Donald Trump and his family down. The tables have turned, and Pam is coming for her.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yo. Let's go. Yo. Pam Bondi ain't playing around. Pam Bondi.
Pam Bondi, I'm a make you a fat stack of pancakes. Boy. Pam Bindi is coming for Leticia James. Get her, Pam. Get her.
Get her. Get her, Pam. She is one of the most corrupt individuals in government. Corrupt. Went after Trump wrongfully.
A witch hunt. Everything she's doing in New York is practically illegal. Get a pound. Bad boys, bad boys. What you're gonna do?
No. Hold on. Well, since we talking about Leticia James, ghetto thing ghetto thing. What you're gonna do? What you're gonna do when they come for you.
I can't stand the rain against my wind. Yo. I'm just so happy. I am so happy. Oh my goodness.
I am loving it. Man, it's about time. And like they like the Democrats always say, nope. No one is above the law. Exactly.
We're gonna take y'all word for it. And and and because y'all ain't above the law, so we coming for you. Pam, do your thing. Get her. I'm sick of her anyway.
Oh, loud mouth woman. I'm so sick of this woman. One of the most corrupt individuals in politics and government. She literally ran just to take Trump down for no reason. Literally.
She said that that came out of her mouth, out of her loud mouth, that she was running to take Donald Trump and his family down. The tables have turned. Leticia, Pam is coming for you.
reSee.it AI Summary
I can't believe NY Attorney General Letitia James is furious after the Trump administration halted payments to New York. It’s wild to think she thought she’d finally take Trump down, only to be sued by his own DOJ. You love to see it.
@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg
NEW: NY Attorney General Letitia James rages after payments to the state of New York were halted by the Trump administration. I can't imagine what life must be like for this woman. She went from thinking she would put the final nail in the coffin for Trump to now being sued by Trump's own DOJ. You love to see it.
Video Transcript AI Summary
It is unacceptable that payments are being made to New York and other states across the nation. This action is unconstitutional and ultra biased, exceeding the intended authority. Attorneys general from various states must uphold the rule of law, as no one, including Elon Musk, treasury officials, or the President, is above it. We, as attorneys general, are prepared to act. This was not the desired outcome.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In payments to the state of New York and to states all across this nation. It is unacceptable, unconstitutional, ultra biased. They've exceeded their authority. And so it's important that attorneys general representing our respective states stand up and enforce the rule of law because Elon Musk, individuals at the treasury, and the president of These United States is not above the law, and we will continue. You know, as attorneys general, we've been we've been preparing for this.
This is not the outcome that we wanted.
@RogerJStoneJr - Roger Stone
Letitia James is guilty of inflating the value of her assets to qualify for mortgages to purchase commercial properties, campaign finance fraud, covering up sexual assault by her chief of staff and her own act of sexual assault. Absolute proof of all of this is in hand. This bitch is going down.
reSee.it AI Summary
Letitia James is facing charges of mortgage fraud related to a federal HAMP loan. For over twenty years, she misrepresented her Brooklyn apartment building as a four-unit property on mortgage applications, despite it officially being five units. This discrepancy allowed her to secure more favorable loans, saving her significant money. Ironically, the same legal principles she used to prosecute others may now lead to her downfall. Additionally, records show that in 1983, she and her father took out a real estate loan together, listed as "husband and wife."
@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga
Additionally, Letitia James is about to be charged with mortgage fraud, a federal crime because it is a federal government HAMP loan. For over two decades, Letitia James repeatedly claimed her Brooklyn apartment building was a four-unit property on mortgage applications—despite official records proving it had five. This may seem a minor discrepancy, but misrepresenting the unit count enabled her to secure more favorable loans, including a 2011 Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) loan that saved her tens of thousands of dollars annually. Now, the same legal principles she used to prosecute others may be her downfall. But there’s more. According to New York City Department of Finance records, on May 20, 1983, Letitia James and her father, Robert James, took out a real estate loan from Kadilac Funding Ltd. for $30,300 as “husband and wife." For the record, Letitia James' mother is Nellie James.
@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga
Pam Bondi just went scorched earth! “We have filed charges the State of New York, Kathy Hochul, Letitia James, and Mark Schroeder.” “As you know, we sued Illinois, and New York didn't listen... you're next.” As big as some of you think this is, it’s bigger! AG Letitia James, I warned you. You have no clue what’s coming for your corrupt wildebeest ass! You may think George Soros and Norm Eisen have your back, but they will be busy with their own cases!
reSee.it AI Summary
I find the irony in General Letitia James' situation quite striking. While she prosecuted Trump for allegedly defrauding lenders, she herself is now facing serious charges for defrauding her own lenders. It feels like poetic justice, and it's clear she's very worried about the outcome.
@amuse - @amuse
LAWFARE: The irony is delicious. General Letitia James prosecuted Trump allegedly defrauding his lenders, but it turns out she was defrauding her lenders during the prosecution. She's facing 30 years in prison and million dollar fine. Poetic justice...
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker highlights the irony of Leticia James, who prosecuted Trump for financial misstatements, now facing similar allegations. The Department of Justice has prosecuted individuals for falsely claiming a property as their principal residence to obtain loans. Applying James's own standards, the speaker suggests potential issues with her claims regarding her principal residence and marital status on loan forms. The speaker also mentions the Supreme Court's ruling in Thompson, requiring knowing false statements, not just misleading ones, for prosecution under sections like ten fourteen.
The Trump administration has made shocking allegations against Leticia James, with the Federal Housing Finance Agency sending a criminal referral to the DOJ accusing her of mortgage fraud. Director Bill Pulte alleges James falsified records to meet lending requirements and receive favorable loan terms, citing a Virginia property claimed as her principal residence and a New York property misclassified to obtain a different type of loan.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Obviously, the irony is perfectly crushing. This is a person who prosecuted Trump for everything short of ripping a label off a mattress. And among the charges that were brought in New York in not just the civil, but the criminal case was making false or misleading statements to financial institutions. And one of these sections, section ten fourteen of of the federal code, is prosecuted. It took me about sixty seconds of a search to find cases that the Department of Justice brought against people who falsely claimed that property was their principal residence in order to get loans.
So this is well tread areas for the the justice department. As for James, if if we applied Leticia James standard that she created, there'd be little question here. This seems pretty straightforward. What what the what the administration is saying is this was not her principal residence. In fact, as a New York elected official, she had to say that her principal residence was in New York.
This was an out of state residence. But also, they claimed that in some of these forms, she actually states that her father is her husband in order to file as a married couple. So there's a lot of those questions. And as you know, the supreme court just stated earlier in March in a case called Thompson that they wanna see knowing false statements under sections like ten fourteen, not just misleading statements. These are misleading statements.
Either it's your principal residence or it's not. It's not. Either you're married to your father or he's your father. So I they we can get a this can satisfy the Thompson standard.
Speaker 1: Representing our respective states, stand up and enforce the rule of law. The president of These United States is not above the law. No matter how rich, powerful, or politically connected you are, everyone must play by the same rules. Please sue him for us. Oh, we're gonna definitely sue.
We're gonna be a real pain in the ass.
Speaker 2: And now the Trump justice department may be a pain in her you know what. The angle has obtained shocking allegations leveled by the Trump administration against New York attorney general Leticia James. The Federal Housing Finance Agency has sent a criminal referral to the DOJ accusing James of mortgage fraud. In a letter to attorney general Pam Bondi, director Bill Pulte says James appears to have falsified records in order to meet certain lending requirements and receive favorable loan terms. He cited a property in Virginia that she's allegedly claimed as her principal residence and a property in New York that she claimed as a four unit structure instead of the required, instead of a five, which Pulte says means she was able to get a different type.
@amuse - @amuse
LAWFARE: General James is very worried. https://t.co/ym59IRqf0O
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states they are focused, prepared, and trained by the best, referencing their education at Howard University where Thurgood Marshall once taught. They directly address Donald Trump, stating, "We're coming for you."
The speaker emphasizes standing up and fighting on, declaring that victory is clear and now. They express impatience, stating they are waiting two years for Hakim Jeffries to bring rest. The speaker concludes by urging action, stating that women have saved democracy before and must do so again.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My mission is clear. I'm focused. I'm prepared. I'm ready. I've been trained by the best.
I went to Howard University that overturned legal segregation in this country. I've been taught in those classrooms with Thurgood Marshall once taught. I'm not afraid of no president. Donald Trump, we're ready for you. We're coming for you.
We're standing up for you. We're fighting on. We're not going down silent. Victory, my friends, is clear. It's now.
And I'm not waiting four years. I'm waiting two until a speaker by the name of Hakim Jeffries comes to bring us some rest. Come on, ladies. It's up to us. We saved this democracy before.
We'll save it now. Let's go.
@SD73660 - Sandy
Letitia James Accuses Trump of Using Justice as a Weapon in Fraud Case Two years ago today,Donald Trump had 2 pose for a mugshot in GA.This event marked the left's relentless effort to manipulate justice against conservatives,transforming the legal system into a political weapon https://t.co/n3EAutw4qp
@Breaking911 - Breaking911
CAN'T MAKE THIS UP! Letitia James says her indictment is the "weaponization of our justice system." "This is political retribution." She cannot be serious. https://t.co/9KePiUG8bX
Video Transcript AI Summary
"This is nothing more than a continuation of the president's desperate weaponization of our justice system." "These charges are baseless, and the president's own public statements make clear that his only goal is political retribution at any cost." "His decision to fire a United States Attorney who refused to bring charges against me and replace them with someone who is blindly loyal not to the law, but to the president is antithetical to the bedrock principles of our country." "I stand strongly behind my office's litigation against the Trump Organization. We conducted a two year investigation based on the facts and evidence, not politics." "Judges have upheld the trial court's finding that Donald Trump, his company, and his two sons are liable for fraud." "We will fight these baseless charges aggressively, and my office will continue to fiercely protect New Yorkers and their rights."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is nothing more than a continuation of the president's desperate weaponization of our justice system. He is forcing federal law enforcement agencies to do his bidding, all because I did my job as the New York state attorney general. These charges are baseless, and the president's own public statements make clear that his only goal is political retribution at any cost. The president's actions are a grave violation of our constitutional order and have drawn sharp criticism from members of both parties. His decision to fire a United States Attorney who refused to bring charges against me and replace them with someone who is blindly loyal not to the law, but to the president is antithetical to the bedrock principles of our country.
This is the time for leaders on both sides of the aisle to speak out against this blatant perversion of our system of justice. I stand strongly behind my office's litigation against the Trump Organization. We conducted a two year investigation based on the facts and evidence, not politics. Judges have upheld the trial court's finding that Donald Trump, his company, and his two sons are liable for fraud. I'm a proud woman of faith, and I know that faith and fear cannot share the same space.
And so today, I'm not fearful. I'm fearless. And as my faith teaches me, no weapon formed against me shall prosper. We will fight these baseless charges aggressively, and my office will continue to fiercely protect New Yorkers and their rights. And I will continue to do my job.