reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@Nationalist_KAG - ConservativeNationalist_1
Megyn Kelly is on Tucker Carlson talking about how journalists need to stop asking questions inserting their own judgement. Uh, her first question to Trump in 2016 was accusing him of not respecting women, then listing all the names he allegedly called women. Stay unemployed.. https://t.co/c2BedRI3id
Video Transcript AI Summary
A debate moderator questioned Donald Trump about his history of disparaging comments about women, citing examples such as calling women "fat pigs, dogs, slobs, and disgusting animals," and referencing disparaging comments on his Twitter account about women's looks, as well as a comment he made to a Celebrity Apprentice contestant about seeing her on her knees. The moderator asked if this reflected the temperament of a president and how he would answer Hillary Clinton's charge that he is part of a war on women. Trump responded that the country's big problem is being politically correct, which he doesn't have time for. He stated that the country is in big trouble and losing to other countries. He added that what he says is often in jest, and if the moderator doesn't like it, he is sorry. He concluded that the country needs strength, energy, quickness, and brain to turn it around.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister Trump, one of the things people love about you is you speak your mind and you don't use a politician's filter. However, that is not without its downsides, in particular when it comes to women. You've called women you don't like fat pigs, dogs, slobs, and disgusting animals. Your Twitter account
Speaker 1: is o'Donnell.
Speaker 0: No. It wasn't. Your Twitter Twitter account thank you. For the record, it was well beyond Rosio.
Speaker 1: I'm sure it was.
Speaker 0: Your Twitter account has several disparaging comments about women's looks. You once told a contestant on Celebrity Apprentice it would be a pretty picture to see her on her knees. Does that sound to you like the temperament of a man we should elect as president? And how will you answer the charge from Hillary Clinton who is likely to be the Democratic nominee that you are part of the war on women?
Speaker 1: I think the big problem this country has is being politically correct. I've been I've been challenged by so many people, and I don't frankly have time for total political correctness. And to be honest with you, this country doesn't have time either. This country is in big trouble. We don't win anymore.
We lose to China. We lose to Mexico, both in trade and at the border. We lose to everybody. And frankly, what I say, and oftentimes, it's fun. It's kidding.
We have a good time. What I say is what I say. And, honestly, Megan, if you don't like it, I'm sorry. I've been very nice to you, although I could probably maybe not be based on the way you have treated me, but I wouldn't do that. But you know what?
We we need strength. We need energy. We need quickness, and we need brain in this country to turn it around. That I can tell you right now.
@simonateba - Simon Ateba
THIS WILL BLOW YOUR MIND: See the media when @realDonaldTrump was in power, and now that @JoeBiden is in the office. @maddow @NicolleDWallace @jrpsaki @JoyVBehar @JoyAnnReid @Lawrence, others should all be ashamed of themselves. SAD - WATCH
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the attack on the whistleblower, questioning their credibility and calling them "so-called whistleblowers." However, others view the whistleblower as a hero and a patriot who bravely came forward with credible allegations. The speakers mention the Biden family and imply that there may be more whistleblowers in the future. They also highlight the challenges and risks faced by whistleblowers in exposing wrongdoing by powerful individuals. The conversation revolves around the whistleblower's role in raising concerns about the Biden family's alleged involvement in a criminal enterprise.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The attack on the whistleblower, is is never wise. It's never lawful. It's never honorable. It's everything you said. It's a travesty.
And I'm not gonna call them whistle blowers.
Speaker 1: They don't deserve whistle blower protection. Action. Each and every one of them has a, strange history. Has, guess what, Russian connections.
Speaker 0: We always do. These are not,
Speaker 1: as we would consider them, whistleblowers, people who are alleging wrongdoing. They weren't really whistleblowers at all.
Speaker 0: In fact, They weren't even credible witnesses.
Speaker 1: 2 or 3 people who are political operatives, but they're not whistleblowers. These guys are not whistleblowers, period. Is a hardworking patriotic person in the intelligence community who just wants to put the information out there. The president To call into question the credibility of this whistleblower, they're referring to this whistleblower as the so called whistleblower. So called whistleblower on the Biden family.
Welcome back to so called whistleblower from the so called whistleblowers. To so called whistleblowers. So called whistle blowers. So called whistle blowers. So called whistle blower.
So called whistle blower. So called Whistleblowers. Whistleblowers. That's what he's calling them. Whistleblower.
Whistle quote unquote. Whistleblowers. They're alleged IRS. Whistleblower. The GOP is marketing as whistleblowers.
Quote quote unquote whistleblowers. Jim Jordan, who's the chair of the oversight committee, is lauding them as Brave American. Whistleblower, a true patriot coming forward with the allegations. But that's why the whistleblower
Speaker 0: Is a hero in many ways.
Speaker 1: This whistleblower is a hero. The whistleblower is a public servant. And now
Speaker 0: To say anonymous. But heroism
Speaker 1: is being thrust On this person. We can't imply this person
Speaker 0: is partisan. This person has
Speaker 1: been deemed credible and a patriot. With great courage to do the right thing. The whistleblower did was really patriotic. Whistleblower was not alone spiritually. The best composed, best written, best documented Such complaint I've ever seen.
Speaker 2: Thank you, whistleblower. I consider your complaint to be credible and urgent.
Speaker 1: Do what Donald Trump was doing in going after Or targeting the people who helped this, I would say, very brave whistleblower. If you've got an allegation against the Biden family, then come on board because you too can be their next whistleblower. Hunter Biden's whistleblower.
Speaker 0: This whistleblower who is gonna just tell us all the horrible things we've been up to. Reappropriating the term whistleblower after doing Everything they could in the life of the actual whistleblower that led to Donald Trump's first impeachment. The actual whistleblower. The actual whistleblower.
Speaker 1: On these goose chases by Jim Jordan after these supposedly whistleblowers. Been trying to undermine The institutions that holds the powerful accountable. To try to come up with a whistleblower who is viable, Whistleblower who is viable.
Speaker 2: I hope there are more whistle blowers out there.
Speaker 1: These folks are sophisticated people inside the White House. I would say your true patriots. Patriotic and dedicated Americans that this country has.
Speaker 0: This whistleblower, this is another human being. It is a terrifying prospect to go and try to sound an alarm about the most powerful person in the country. The major pillars that prop Of the republican fiction, the president Joe Biden and his family are entangled in some sort of criminal enterprise. The first pillar, a so called whistleblower.
@orwell2022 - Orwell2024🏒
Once upon a time, the media (even CNN) still knew how to do its job. https://t.co/orLBQiXqH9
Video Transcript AI Summary
Pfizer, a company too big to fail, made a deal with the government to avoid being excluded from Medicare and Medicaid. They created a shell company, Pharmacia and Upjohn Company Incorporated, to take the blame for any convictions. This allowed Pfizer to continue doing business with the federal government. Despite paying a $1.2 billion criminal fine and settling civil suits for $1 billion, Pfizer's punishment may not be enough to deter other big pharma companies from engaging in illegal activities. The fear is that dealing with the Department of Justice is just seen as a cost of doing business.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just as giant banks on Wall Street were considered too big to fail, Pfizer was considered too big to nail. Why? Because a company convicted of major fraud would automatically be kicked out of Medicare and Medicaid. Pfizer would no longer be allowed to bill any federal health programs for any of its products. It would be a corporate death sentence.
Speaker 1: If a company like Pfizer ex is excluded from Medicare and Medicaid, they're out of business.
Speaker 0: Lewis Morris, a top lawyer at the Department of Health and Human Services, told us Pfizer's collapse could leave 1,000 out of work, Millions not getting their medications.
Speaker 1: We have to ask whether by excluding the company, are we harming our patients? Are we harming the beneficiaries who need these critical drugs?
Speaker 0: Since shutting down Pfizer was unthinkable, Pfizer and the feds cut a deal. And here's how they did it. Pfizer, located here in New York, owns a company named Pharmacia Corporation, which owns another company called Pharmacia and Upjohn LLC, which owns Pharmacia and Upjohn Company LLC, which in turn owns Pharmacia and Upjohn Company Incorporated. And what does Pharmacia and Upjohn Company Incorporated do? Nothing.
It's a shell created to be a legal shield for Pfizer. In other words, if Pfizer was at risk of being convicted, The Shell company would take the hit. Think of it as the great great grandson of the parent company. Birthday, March 27, 2007, just in time to plead guilty in a kickback case Against the company Pfizer had acquired a few years earlier. With that conviction, Pharmacia and Upjohn Company Incorporated, Which had never sold so much as a single pill was excluded from Medicare.
2 years later, When Pfizer was in trouble with Bextra, Pharmacia and Upjohn Company Incorporated, the Shell company, stepped up again and pleaded guilty. It was like having an imaginary friend, an imaginary bad guy to take the rap. And Pfizer, too big to nail, is still doing business with the federal government.
Speaker 1: It is true that if a company is created, to take a criminal plea, but it's just a shell. The impact of an exclusion is minimal or nonexistent.
Speaker 0: Did the punishment fit the crime? Pfizer says yes. It paid nearly $1,200,000,000 in a criminal fine for Bextra, the largest Fine ever. It paid $1,000,000,000 more to settle civil suits, although it denies wrongdoing on allegations it illegally promoted 12 other drugs. In all, Pfizer lost the equivalent of 3 months profit.
But even Mike Lautz, who spent more than a decade prosecuting some of the largest Drug companies in the country isn't sure that $2,000,000,000 is enough to make big pharma clean up its act.
Speaker 2: I worry that the incentives are so great, the money is so great, that that has, maybe made Dealing with us, the Department of Justice, is just a cost of doing business.
@LarryTaunton - Larry Alex Taunton
It’s rich when actual traitors who have sold out the people of the United States to a globalist — thus, by definition anti-American — agenda are calling #TuckerCarlson… …a traitor. https://t.co/gfbCjT526f
@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer
WATCH: I caught up with and confronted @CNN host @kaitlancollins in NYC today outside of the Manhattan court house where President Trump is on trial. Kaitlan always has so much to say on TV when she’s talking shit about Trump. She didn’t have much to say today, though… #MAGA https://t.co/gFMeFRHaBp
Video Transcript AI Summary
Caitlin Collins from CNN interviewed a retired US federal judge about a motion involving Judge Marchand's recusal due to his daughter's conflicts of interest. The judge deemed the motion strong, but Collins did not comment. Accusations of bias were made against CNN, claiming they are anti-Trump. The speaker criticized Collins for avoiding the question and praised the benefits of having a press badge. Despite being polite, Collins allegedly ran away upon realizing the speaker's identity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, Caitlin. Caitlin. Hi. Hey. Laura Limerick here.
I was just wondering, you know, the other day you had a judge on. The other day, you had a retired US federal judge on your show, and you were asking her about the motion that was filed by president Trump and his legal team about whether or not judge Marshawn should recuse himself, right, over his daughter's conflicts of interest. What do you think about that? I saw that the judge actually said that the motion was pretty strong, but you didn't really have much to say. We had her on the show, didn't we?
Yeah. But you didn't really have much to say when she said it was strong. Do you think that judge Marchand should recuse himself? No. Doesn't wanna answer the question?
No. Alright. Alright. Well, as you can see, that's Caitlin Collins from, CNN. She's one of the biggest Trump haters out there, and she doesn't wanna answer the question.
She had a retired US federal judge from the Southern District of New York on her show the other day asking about whether or not, this motion requesting recusal was strong enough, and she didn't want to, acknowledge what the judge said. And the judge said that, it was strong. So just more bias from CNN. They're part of the Get Trump movement as we know, but, look, she has so much to say. These people have so much to say when they're on TV, but then when you ask them a question, they just run away.
I was very polite. I was very nice. I didn't yell at her, but she didn't wanna stop. And as soon as I said who I was, she ran away. But that's the good thing about having a press badge too is they can't run and they can't hide.
@MAGAIncWarRoom - MAGA War Room
Fake News CNN cuts off @kleavittnh after she calls out Jake Tapper's anti-Trump history. CNN is afraid of people knowing the truth. https://t.co/Tku7Ew754v
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker confronts the interviewer about their bias towards Donald Trump and attacks on colleagues. They express a desire to discuss Joe Biden and Trump impartially. The interviewer is asked to stop the interview if the attacks continue. The speaker is then cut off and the interview ends abruptly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, first of all, it's so it takes someone 5 minutes to Google Jake Tapper, Donald Trump to see that Jake Tapper has Ma'am, can you just stop this interview if you're gonna keep my contact it all filtered. President's on the call. Adolf Hilter. Ma'am, I'm gonna stop this interview if you continue to attack my colleagues. I would like to talk about Joe Biden and Donald Trump who you work for.
Yes. If you are here
Speaker 1: to speak
Speaker 0: on his behalf, we will have this conversation. I am stating facts that your colleagues have stated in the past. Now, I'm sorry, guys. We're gonna
Speaker 1: come back out to the panel.
Speaker 0: Caroline, thank you very much for your time. You are welcome to come back
@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci
Unhinged loser Keith Olbermann is now trying to say that CNN and Trump were "tag team partners" in the debate. 😂🤣🤡 https://t.co/CWX6RasQG6
Video Transcript AI Summary
Last night's debate had 3 participants: President Joe Biden, Donald Trump, and CNN as their ally.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The debate last night had not 2 participants but 3. It was in fact the president of the United States, Joe Biden, against Donald Trump and their tag team partners CNN.
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
Democrats need to "turn their fire on Donald Trump" - CNN contributor Kate Bedingfield before quickly backtracking. Just imagine the outrage if it was a Fox host saying that about a Democrat days after an attempted ass*ss*nat*on on them. https://t.co/bD5y2o8L8B
Video Transcript AI Summary
He repeatedly stated that he will not step down and will be the nominee. Democrats should focus on defeating Donald Trump in the election instead of attacking each other.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He has said many, many times after having been questioned many times about this, that he's not stepping down, and he is going to be the nominee. So at some point, Democrats have to decide that they want to try to win this election and turn their fire on Donald Trump. I think there is I I shouldn't have said turn their fire. I apologize. That's That was not the phrase that I meant.
They need to turn their focus on Donald Trump. So
@simonateba - Simon Ateba
Shocking proof that the entire Democrat-Media Complex blindly parrots DNC talking points. Watch them all repeat the same scripted lines! This is really weird!!! WATCH https://t.co/Q5wjpS5V6d
Video Transcript AI Summary
Trump and his running mate, JD Vance, are repeatedly described as weird by the speakers. Vance's behavior, policies, and comments are all labeled as weird and cultish. The speakers question Vance's ability to connect with the public due to his strange demeanor and sarcastic remarks. Overall, the video emphasizes the perception of Trump and Vance as weird individuals in the eyes of the public.
Translation: The speakers in the video repeatedly call Trump and his running mate, JD Vance, weird. They criticize Vance's behavior, policies, and comments as strange and cult-like. The speakers doubt Vance's ability to connect with the public because of his odd demeanor and sarcastic remarks. The video highlights the public's perception of Trump and Vance as strange individuals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Some of what he and his running mate are saying, well, it's just plain weird.
Speaker 1: These guys are just weird. That's where they are. Not as weird and creepy, as JD Vance. Super weird idea from JD Vance.
Speaker 0: Yeah. It's not. I mean, it's quite weird. Just plain weird. Just plain weird.
Just plain weird.
Speaker 1: That stuff is weird. They come across weird, and then they start being weird. Yeah. They're weird.
Speaker 0: Being a really weird
Speaker 1: He's such a weirdo.
Speaker 0: Trump and his weirdo running mate are weird, deeply and profoundly weird. They are
Speaker 1: weird. These Republicans just being weird? It's just weird. It's really weird.
Speaker 0: Republican weirdness goes even deeper. He said a lot of things
Speaker 1: that are weird, a weird style that
Speaker 0: he brings, weird policies. Let's start with with the weird thing because it is a thing. Just plain weird. What was weird was
Speaker 1: just talking about diet Mountain Dew. Who who drinks diet Mountain Dew? Whoever seen the guy laugh, that seems very weird to me that, that an adult can go through 6 and a half years of being in the public eye. If he has laughed, it's at someone, not with someone. That that is weird behavior.
Speaker 0: Weird and cultish.
Speaker 1: These are weird people on the other side.
Speaker 0: He kinda doubled down on his weird ideas. I think weird is probably generous. Simply weird. These guys are just plain weird. Dance as weird?
You know, as the campaign said, weird? It really is just plain weird. JD Vance, plain weird. I mean, how the hell is he gonna read it? Weird.
It is kinda weird.
Speaker 1: We're not afraid of weird people.
Speaker 0: The
Speaker 1: other side, they're just weird. Why are you being so weird? Vance has done something more extreme, more weird.
Speaker 0: No matter what kind of weird stuff they keep saying. Trump and Vance are just weird. In addition, it should've been dangerous to the box. That's the weird part that's the most engaging.
Speaker 1: Whom he addressed as my beautiful Christians, which was super weird.
Speaker 0: Weird tech bro, JD Vance. He's a weird guy. JD Vance, uneasy and sort of weird. Frankly, for lack of a better word, that he's weird. Sarcastic remarks that aren't even funny, and he kinda shows that he can't really deliver, one liner.
So, Sam, weird is the word here, in terms of initial impressions from Vance, to the American public.
@JzeViewing - Jimbo
Tucker Carlson is CIA https://t.co/IE9nmm6dcf
Video Transcript AI Summary
Tucker Carlson has given varied responses regarding his connections to the CIA. He stated that he applied to the CIA as a college senior wanting to work in operations, influenced by his father's friends who were operations officers. He claimed he "had no idea what the CIA was, actually" at the time.
Carlson acknowledged his father's work in conjunction with the CIA. According to Alan MacLeod, Carlson's father, Richard Carlson, directed the US Information Agency (USIA) under Ronald Reagan, overseeing Radio Liberty and Voice of America, which the New York Times called a CIA-built "worldwide propaganda network." Radio Free Europe was directly funded by the CIA until the 1970s. Richard Carlson ran Voice of America, essentially the broadcasting wing of the CIA's propaganda machine, at the height of the Cold War.
Carlson now claims to be a "sworn enemy of the CIA." When asked about the Nord Stream pipeline explosion, Carlson denied involvement, but the CIA was implicated. The speaker questions whether it is a coincidence that the son of the former head of the US intelligence agency and director of Voice of Liberty for the CIA is one of the most influential political pundits in America.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When Tucker Carlson is asked about any of his connections to the CIA, he always seems to give a very confusing mix of responses. In an interview with a former member of the CIA, Sean Ryan, he was asked about it. He recounted how everyone around him growing up was in the CIA because his father was. Despite this, he also says that he had no idea what the CIA really was.
Speaker 1: You were trying to get into CIA? Yes. Vladimir Putin reminded me. I don't know how he knew that. Yeah.
I applied to CIA when I was a senior in college. What did you want to do for the CIA? Operations. Yeah, it was completely different. Completely different organization.
Well, who knows what it was, actually? I don't know. I mean, I was operating on the basis of a lot of my father's friends served as operations officers, some really wonderful guys, who I guess I probably shouldn't name, but who were always at our house and were just legit interesting people. So I applied to CIA and that whole application process then, this was 1990, and I should just say, for the record, that I, like, had no idea what the CIA was, actually. And I didn't believe any of the I think Kermit Roosevelt actually lived right down the street from us.
Are you kidding? No. Oh, man. That's cool.
Speaker 0: This isn't particularly relevant other than this being like a CIA super spy. Kermit Roosevelt Junior is a very famous intelligence officer who worked in the OSS and then the CIA. He was best known for his role in orchestrating the nineteen fifty three coup in Iran.
Speaker 1: But I didn't know I mean, but that was just the world you live in in Northwest DC. Like, I didn't I I never thought any of it was bad. And so when I applied to CIA, and I've taken a lot of crap, including from Putin, Oh, you're from a CIA family. Well, yeah, obviously my father worked in conjunction with CIA. Mean, that's what that is.
And I tried to join the CIA, but I'm not being false about it. I am a sworn enemy of the CIA at this point. No doubt about that. I just wanted a life that was interesting. I wanted to see stuff.
Speaker 0: This would all be a lot more believable conspicuous if he hadn't ended up becoming one of the most influential conservative news pundits in American history. Tucker Carlson himself says that he comes from a CIA family and that his father worked for the CIA. Alan MacLeod of Minton Press writes, Richard Carlson is an important journalist and high state official who was appointed by Ronald Reagan as director of the US Information Agency, USIA, which oversees Radio Liberty and Voice of America, which Dick was also the director. Together, these outlets are part of what The New York Times called a worldwide propaganda network built by the CIA. Their goal is to bombard enemy countries with regime change propaganda.
Until the nineteen seventies, Radio Free Europe was directly funded by the CIA. Richard Carlson would have been running Voice of America and then the branch of the CIA that oversaw Voice of America at the height of the Cold War, basically the broadcasting wing of the CIA's propaganda machine.
Speaker 2: With the backing of CIA, of course, the organization you wanted to join back in the day, as I understand. We should thank God they didn't let you in. Although, it is a serious organization. I understand. My former vis a vis, in the sense that I served in the first main directorate, Soviet Union's intelligence service.
Who
Speaker 1: blew up Nord Stream?
Speaker 2: You for sure.
Speaker 1: I was busy that day. Nate, do you have do you I did not blow up Nord Stream.
Speaker 2: Thank you though. You personally may have an alibi, but the CIA has no such alibi. Is
Speaker 0: it a coincidence the former head of the US intelligence agency and director of voice of liberty for the CIA's son is one of the most influential political pundits in America?
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
In case you needed a reminder of how the media operates. https://t.co/Cy4wfTrapI
Video Transcript AI Summary
CNN allegedly edited a video to falsely depict Trump dumping fish food in Japan, when he was following the prime minister's lead. NBC News falsely reported Putin claimed to have compromising information on Trump; Putin actually denied it.
The New York Times and CNN allegedly shared photos of immigrant children in cages from 2014, during the Obama administration. Newsweek falsely reported Trump golfed in Florida during Thanksgiving 2019; he was serving troops in Afghanistan.
CBS allegedly aired a story in March 2020 showing a crowded New York hospital, using file footage from Italy, and repeated the error a week later. The BBC and The Guardian reported Trump didn't listen to an Italian prime minister's speech because he wasn't wearing headsets, but he was wearing an earpiece. Newsweek reported Poland's first lady refused to shake Trump's hand, but later acknowledged she did.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: CNN edited the video to make it appear as though Trump impatiently dumped a box of fish food into the water in Japan. The full video showed Trump had simply followed the lead of Japan's prime minister. In June 2017, NBC News reported that Russian president Putin said he had compromising information about Trump. Actually, Putin said the opposite. Do you have something damaging on our president?
Well, this is just another load of nonsense. Where would we get this information? The New York Times and CNN shared a story with photos of immigrant children in cages. It turns out the photos were from 2014 during the Obama administration. In November 2019, Newsweek falsely reported that president Trump was spending Thanksgiving golfing in Florida.
He was actually in Afghanistan serving dinner to US troops. Good morning. CBS aired a story in March of 2020 supposedly showing a New York hospital crowded with patients It's all hands on deck in America's hospitals. It was actually filed tape from Italy. A week later, CBS News mistakenly used the Italy video again.
In May, the BBC and The Guardian reported because Trump wasn't wearing headsets, he didn't bother to listen to the translation of a speech by Italy's prime minister. But Trump was wearing his ear piece in his right ear as always at the White House. Newsweek reported Poland's first lady refused to shake Trump's hand, but later acknowledged she did.
@JohnStossel - John Stossel
The media treat Republicans and Democrats differently. Probably because for every Republican in a newsroom, there are TEN Democrats. https://t.co/VVDMtLJtAP
Video Transcript AI Summary
The media treats Republicans differently, with examples including CNN cutting away from Trump's speech after the Iowa caucus and MSNBC showing none of it. Rachel Maddow said it's not responsible to broadcast Trump live because he lies so much. Both Trump and Biden lie, but the media focuses more on Republican lies. Newsrooms have ten times more Democrats than Republicans, and NPR's new CEO tweeted that Trump is a racist and defended looting during BLM.
The media criticizes Texas for refusing to remove a fence after the feds told them to, but they don't criticize sanctuary cities for not following federal immigration laws. Argentina's new president, a libertarian, is labeled "far right" and "Trump-like" despite his policies differing from Trump's. When he threatened to cut welfare benefits for protesters blocking streets, the protests stopped.
More people are ignoring leftist media and getting their news from independent journalists on platforms like Substack and YouTube.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have you noticed how some in the media just suck up to some politicians?
Speaker 1: I'm struck just in your presence.
Speaker 0: Struck in her presence.
Speaker 1: Looking you in the eye with your passion that you are displaying.
Speaker 0: Republicans are treated differently.
Speaker 1: If if
Speaker 0: let me finish this answer, because this is this is really important. I'm gonna
Speaker 1: go ahead and interrupt you here. On the deal, Kaye. With that, sir. Let's just just just my question, though, governor. Excuse me.
Speaker 0: Aggressive interviews are easy to notice, but some bias is more subtle. For example What a great campaign. The media have always covered Iowa caucus victory speeches.
Speaker 1: We're gonna wanna listen in very, very closely. Thank you, Iowa.
Speaker 0: But this year, when Trump won
Speaker 1: Thank you. We love you all.
Speaker 0: CNN cut away from his speech.
Speaker 1: Here he is right now under under my voice. You hear him repeating his anti immigrant rhetoric.
Speaker 0: Actually, no, Jake. You hear him. We don't. CNN wouldn't let us actually listen to Trump and decide for ourselves. MSNBC showed none of Trump's speech.
Rachel Maddow said We will let you know if there's any news made. Maddow says it's not responsible to broadcast Trump live because he lies so much. But we reporters can point that out instead of cutting away when he talks. I've repeatedly reported on Trump's lies. Trump lies even about unimportant things like the crowd at his inauguration, the ratings of his TV show, but Biden lies too.
Here he lies about doing well in law school.
Speaker 1: Ended up in the top half of my class. Biden now concedes he did not graduate in the top half of his law school class.
Speaker 0: He also lied when he said
Speaker 2: I have never discussed with my son or my brother or anyone else anything having to do with their businesses, period.
Speaker 0: I shouldn't be surprised that the media treat Republicans differently. For every Republican in newsrooms, there are ten Democrats. And now NPR has actually hired this woman to be its new CEO. She not only tweeted, Trump's a racist. But during BLM, looting said, sure, looting is counterproductive, but it's fine because what they're looting comes from a system of oppression.
She's now the boss of government funded radio? Yes. Here's another example.
Speaker 1: The governor of Texas refuses to give in to federal law.
Speaker 0: Recently, reporters suddenly got very upset about rule of law.
Speaker 1: The governor of Texas refuses to give in to federal law.
Speaker 0: The media can't believe that Texas politicians put up a fence and won't remove it even after the feds told them to. But when it comes to sanctuary cities, the tone is very different.
Speaker 1: Communities that shield undocumented immigrants by not reporting offenses to immigration enforcement.
Speaker 3: They choose not to follow federal immigration laws.
Speaker 0: They simply choose not to follow the law. They don't refuse like Texas does.
Speaker 1: The governor of Texas refuses to give in to federal law.
Speaker 0: Finally, the way the media labels politicians is just biased. Argentina's new president is a libertarian who promises to take a chainsaw to big government, so the media call him far right. Far right radical.
Speaker 1: Far right Javier Millet. Far right Javier Millet.
Speaker 3: Far right libertarian Javier Millet.
Speaker 0: At least she calls him libertarian, but libertarians aren't far right. Most of us support ending wars, free trade, gay marriage, and all sorts of things far from far right. The late supports legalizing the sale of human organs. Maybe you oppose organ markets, but it's not far right. Conservatives are more likely to oppose organ sales.
The shallow media just label anyone who doesn't agree with them right wing.
Speaker 1: Argentina elected a right wing former TV host.
Speaker 0: Far right. Far right and Trump like.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump of Argentina.
Speaker 0: He makes Trump almost look like a conventional political candidate.
Speaker 3: He is nothing like Trump.
Speaker 0: Economist Daniel DiMartino points out that Malay's policies are very different from Trump's.
Speaker 3: The only thing that's similar to Trump is that he went against the establishment. He's funny in his speeches. He's charismatic. He has crazy hair, but that's it. I mean, this is a guy who's for free trade.
This is a guy with very set on principles, who's very smart on on economics.
Speaker 0: The media eagerly cover protesters who oppose malaise cutting the size of government.
Speaker 1: Thousands are attending demonstrations opposing his drastic cuts to public spending.
Speaker 0: Media call most any budget cut drastic, slash and burn, astronomical, draconian. But at least in Argentina, the proposed cuts are big. A lot of people don't like this. Unions are protesting.
Speaker 3: In Argentina, it's very popular to protest on block streets.
Speaker 1: It's the second protest against him this month.
Speaker 0: But president Malay did something different because some union members get welfare payments.
Speaker 3: He said that anybody who blocks a street illegally will lose all welfare benefits. Guess what happened? No streets were blocked.
Speaker 0: Who knew that protesters blocking streets could be stopped by threatening their government handouts? You won't hear it from the leftist media. Libertarians get trashed. Republicans get interrupted and their speeches cut off, but Democrats largely get a pass even if you can't tell what they say.
Speaker 1: Beer brewed here. It is used
Speaker 4: to make the brew beer in
Speaker 1: this department. Oh, earth rider. Thanks for the great legs.
Speaker 0: But there is some good news. Today, more people ignore leftist media. CNN's prime time viewership fell behind the history channels recently. More people now get their news from independent journalists who publish in places like Substack and YouTube like us. It's a good trend because we're more thoughtful than the silly people on TV.
Speaker 1: Mister president, how do you do that? Chaka chaka chip. Oh, yeah.
@cb_doge - DogeDesigner
Remember when media outlets got caught using the same script? It’s a clear sign they’re controlled by the same people. Share this with anyone who believes everything they see on the news, and remind them: legacy media is nothing more than a propaganda machine. https://t.co/pSwFhNvtr2
@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd
Colbert cuts off Claire Danes before she spills the tea about the intelligence community “allying itself” with the legacy media during Trump’s first term Watch until the end… https://t.co/c4q7VUXaFe
Video Transcript AI Summary
We have a tradition of spending time with real spies each season, which is one of the best parts of my job. Henry Burmele, a founding writer of Homeland, set this up through connections from his family in the CIA. His retired cousin organizes a weeklong spy camp for us, where we engage with actual intelligence professionals, state department officials, and journalists in Georgetown. Each year brings new insights; this time, we learned about the growing distrust between the administration and the intelligence community. Interestingly, the intelligence community is now aligning more with journalists, which reflects a significant shift in dynamics.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. So now one of the things that you do do you do this every season where you go get to spend some time with some actual spies?
Speaker 1: We do. It's like the coolest part of my job.
Speaker 0: Who sets that up? Who calls the CIA and goes, we just like to come in and hang out with you guys?
Speaker 1: So Henry Burmele, who is one of our founding fathers of Homeland, one of our writers, passed away a a number of years ago. But his dad was in the CIA, and his cousin was a mentee of his father's and was also in the CIA, a very accomplished person there. And he recently retired. But in his retirement, he curates this weeklong spy camp for us, producers and writers and
Speaker 0: Really? Yeah. Is it like, you know
Speaker 1: So we park ourselves in a a club in Georgetown and talk to, like, real spooks and, you know, people in the intelligence community and and the state department and journalists and people who really
Speaker 0: What do they tell you that like, what what's the most surprising thing that they've told you about their jobs or something you would need to know
Speaker 1: for them? Year, it's different. Right? We've been at it for a while, and and the climate has been has changed. But this year, it was all about, you know, the distrust between the administration and and the intelligence world.
And, and the intelligence community was suddenly kind of allying itself with journalists, which is so
Speaker 0: long that that's this ep this season.
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
CNN just aired this holy shlit 🤣 https://t.co/3F0ZkIQyT7
Video Transcript AI Summary
The 2024 election has been chaotic, with the Democrats struggling to hold a primary while managing internal issues. It's surprising that the pro-choice party didn't provide their voters with options for the presidential candidate. Kamala Harris has been heavily promoted, almost as if she were a product from a major pharmaceutical company.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A 2024 election fried our brains. The Democrats couldn't hold a primary because they were too busy holding a body upright. Are we still rolling in my office? Go for it. It was amazing that the pro choice party didn't give their voters one when it came to the presidential candidate.
Kamala was forced on us so hard, you'd think she was patented by Pfizer or Moderna, whichever one's oh, god. Andy just gave me a very scary look. Go.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
SAVAGE🤣🔥 President Trump just SHUT CNN’s Kaitlan Collins DOWN. President Trump: "Excuse me, we haven't asked you to speak yet." https://t.co/t6q3ozTMUL
Video Transcript AI Summary
I won the White House partly because of high inflation.
We haven't asked you to speak yet. Please wait.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, that's a good one.
Speaker 1: Mister president, you won the White House in part because of high inflation. If your tariffs make prices go up Excuse me.
Speaker 0: We haven't asked you to speak yet, please. Yeah. Okay.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
CNN’s Anderson Cooper is again questioned about his confirmed ties to The CIA He’s being confronted about his role in the mainstream medias weaponization against Americans It’s time for US Government, including intelligence agencies to be removed from the media https://t.co/hucjOh8tns
Video Transcript AI Summary
I was wondering if you had a chance to look into Operation Mockingbird, the declassified program from the 1970s where the CIA infiltrated the mainstream media.
Do you think it could be happening today?
I find it concerning that domestic American coverage of world events focuses on Russia and Iran, but not Saudi Arabia. Why aren't human rights violations in Saudi Arabia covered as extensively as they should be?
Go to Saudi Arabia and do it yourself.
I don't mean to be rude, but Anderson Cooper's Wikipedia page states he received CIA training in college but no journalism training.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, Anderson. We had a great interview last time. I was wondering if you get a chance to look into Operation Mockingbird. I you know what that is.
Speaker 1: You're talking about something, what, from nineteen fifties, dude?
Speaker 0: Nineteen seventies, official declassified program, how the CIA infiltrated the mainstream media from the higher up.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 0: It's declassified.
Speaker 1: I write about in college. Yes. I do. Nice.
Speaker 0: Do you think it's something that could possibly be happening today?
Speaker 1: I have no comment for you. Thanks, dude.
Speaker 0: Why not? I mean, you didn't have any journalistic training except CIA training. I mean think I was overthinking. But do you feel it's an issue of concern when it comes to kind of domestic American coverage of the world events? We see a lot of coverage of Russia and a lot of coverage of Iran, but not Saudi Arabia.
Why do you think human rights violations in Saudi Arabia are not covered as extensively as they should be?
Speaker 1: Have you been to Saudi Arabia?
Speaker 0: No. Not yet. Well, good luck.
Speaker 1: You go there and do it.
Speaker 0: I will. Probably. Now,
Speaker 2: I don't wanna be considered rude or mean when I told Anderson Cooper to his face that he received no journalism training at all except for training by the CIA. But that's actually stated on his own Wikipedia, and he admittedly was trained to be in the CIA when he was in college and received no journalism training.
@ScottJenningsKY - Scott Jennings
I spend most of my time repeating back to liberals their own words and ideas, only to have them - seconds later - deny ever saying them. It’s truly astonishing. This convo on @cnn 👀 https://t.co/xVNSPOFbBN
Video Transcript AI Summary
I believe Doge isn't about money, but shrinking government to limit its power, even against figures like Trump.
But, if Trump is the head of the government, why would the government try to stop him?
Because the bureaucracy should uphold the Constitution and prevent authoritarianism, holding everyone accountable and ensuring the government works for the people.
Trump is shredding the Constitution, but we never said the bureaucracy should resist political leadership. We are saying that the President will put someone in charge who will contravene the constitution. This is what dictatorships do.
The President is in charge of the military, as per the Constitution, which vests executive authority in the President. The idea of an independent military or a bureaucracy resisting political leadership is dangerous.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: May be real for a moment that Doge is not about cutting money. Right? It's not about spending. It's about shrinking government so that it'll be too small to stop Trump with whatever else is in this plan.
Speaker 1: Why would the government why would the government stop Trump? Isn't he the head of the government? You're saying the government would be too small to stop Trump? If Trump's the president, why would the government the bureaucracy be actively trying to stop him?
Speaker 2: Because they wanna uphold the constitution. And creating an authoritarian dictatorship. That's why. And no matter who was in office, I'm going to hold them accountable. But more importantly, I'm going to make sure the government is working for the American people.
Speaker 1: Both both of you made an interesting point, which is that your view is that Trump is shredding the constitution. I'd like to hear more about that. But that it seems to me that you all both believe that the unelected part of our government, the bureaucracy, has a responsibility to resist the political leadership. Is that your view?
Speaker 2: That's not actually what not at all. We said they are upholding the constitution, the principles of
Speaker 0: the FBI, now we're in control of the military.
Speaker 2: We're silencing media. Chiefs.
Speaker 1: This is what you
Speaker 2: do in a dictatorship.
Speaker 1: Are you are you suggesting that the president is not the commander in chief of the military?
Speaker 0: I am suggesting that the president is going to put in charge somebody who
Speaker 2: is going to contravene the constitution. And at some near point, this conversation will look very silly for you because it would be obvious. And right now, you're gaslighting. When we get to the actual He's not rubber
Speaker 0: of the road of this,
Speaker 1: it will be clear. I'm I'm interested in this conversation. He's going to put someone in charge who will contravene a like, who? What do you mean by that? The president is in charge of the military, is he not?
You said he's gonna put someone
Speaker 2: in charge of the The president is in charge of the military. That is how it works.
Speaker 1: He was elected president. We, according to the constitution, vest all executive authority in a president. And the concept that the military should be an independent agency or that the bureaucracy should resist the political leadership of this government is extraordinarily dangerous.
Speaker 0: We so we're saying that's that's a struggle.
Speaker 2: That's literally not what we said. It I'm just repeating back to you. You're all I I did
Speaker 0: not
@GuntherEagleman - Gunther Eagleman™
CNN is continuing its character assassination of @LauraLoomer over her informing Trump of bad seeds in his teams. These people are OBSESSED with Laura. https://t.co/kkdAmvM6fZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
CNN learned the White House fired multiple administration officials after President Trump met with far-right activist Laura Loomer. Loomer went to the West Wing with a list of about a dozen names, urging Trump to fire them based on loyalty.
At least three national security staffers were fired. National Security Advisor Michael Waltz was meeting with Trump when Loomer came in and said that Deputy Secretary Alex Wong wasn't loyal.
Loomer had access to Trump on the campaign trail, including traveling with him to a 9/11 memorial. She complained about a lack of access to the West Wing recently. Loomer confirmed the meeting but declined to divulge details, stating it was an honor to present Trump with her findings and that she will continue to reiterate the importance of strong vetting. She believes some people got into the national security council without being loyal to the president.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: CNN has learned the White House has fired multiple administration officials after the president met with a well known far right activist.
Speaker 1: That's right. That activist is Laura Loomer, who you see there in red. She was seen there at the White House yesterday greeting commerce secretary Howard Lutnick. Very much so there. CNN's Elena Treen outside the White House for us.
Elena, your sources say Lumer urged Trump to terminate these employees. Can you tell us who they are, why they were let go?
Speaker 2: Yeah. She actually went in, I was told, to the West Wing with a list of around a dozen names, and urged president Donald Trump, to fire them. A lot of this was more about loyalty tests and whether or not these people had, the president's best interest at heart, at least from her point of view. Now this was first reported by the New York Times. So what we've learned since is that, the White House has actually moved forward with firing multiple administration officials, at least three national security staffers, were also on that list.
And look, it's interesting because we know that national security adviser Michael Waltz, he was actually meeting with the president in the Oval Office before Lumer had entered the West Wing and came in to meet with him. So we ended up staying back, and he was there while she was doing this, while she was telling him how many of the staffers who served beneath him, including, his principal deputy secretary national secretary, excuse me. Yeah. His deputy secretary, Alex Wong, saying that he, was too that he wasn't loyal as well. So a very interesting meeting.
And I wanna give you just a little bit of context on Lumer because she's someone, as you mentioned, she's a far right activist. She's actually someone who had a lot of access to the president while he was on the campaign trail. We did a story, last fall about how she had, traveled with president Donald Trump to a 09:11 memorial, something that actually caused a lot of consternation within his, inner circle. And she's been complaining in recent weeks as well that she hasn't had enough access to the West Wing. But yesterday, of course, we saw we know now that she has met with him.
And I'm told as well that the president actually moved forward with a lot of these firings because of her urging of him to do so. Now I did speak with Lumer as well. I wanna read you just a bit of the statement she sent me. She confirmed, that she had met with him and said out of respect for president Trump and the privacy of the Oval Office, I'm going to decline on divulging any details. But she went on to say, that it was an honor to, quote, present him with my findings.
I will continue working hard to support his agenda, and I will continue reiterating the importance of strong vetting for the sake of protecting the president and our national security. So you can hear there how she's clearly saying that she believes that people somehow got into the national security council without really being as loyal to the president as we know that, you know, many of these people who were vetted by Sergio Agourt, the head of the presidential personnel office. She's arguing that they weren't that loyal, and now we're seeing many of them actually get fired. Boris, Brianna.
Speaker 1: Alright. Elena Treen, thank you for the report. In less than an hour, a federal judge is expected to hold the Trump administration to a
@nicksortor - Nick Sortor
🚨 WATCH: MULTIPLE members of the Trump admin take turns dunking on CNN’s Kaitlan Collins for pushing fake news about an MS-13 member deported to El Salvador This is so beautiful 🤣 Way to go Rubio, Miller, Bondi, and Bukele 🔥 https://t.co/nHqyLBZ4ck
Video Transcript AI Summary
The administration was asked about a man who was allegedly mistakenly deported to El Salvador.
It was stated that the individual was illegally in the U.S. and that two immigration courts ruled in 2019 that he was a member of MS-13. Additional paperwork was needed, and it is up to El Salvador if they want to return him. The Supreme Court ruled that if El Salvador wants to return him, the U.S. would facilitate it by providing a plane.
Because the individual is a citizen of El Salvador, it is arrogant for American media to suggest the U.S. would tell El Salvador how to handle their own citizens. Because Trump declared MS-13 a foreign terrorist organization, the individual was no longer eligible for immigration relief and had a valid deportation order. A district court judge tried to compel the administration to kidnap the citizen of El Salvador and fly him back, but the Supreme Court unanimously reversed the district court order.
The ruling stated that if El Salvador sent the individual back to the U.S. at their discretion, the U.S. could deport him a second time. The U.S. does not have the power to return him, and they are not fond of releasing terrorists into the country. No court in the U.S. has a right to conduct the foreign policy of the U.S.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Return the man who your administration says was mistakenly deported the man who was mistakenly deported to El Salvador?
Speaker 1: Well, let me ask Pam. Would you ask answer that question?
Speaker 2: Sure, president. First and foremost, he was illegally in our country. He had been illegally in our country. And in 2019, '2 courts, an immigration court and an appellate immigration court ruled that he was a member of MS thirteen and he was illegally in our country. Right now, it was a paperwork.
It was additional paperwork had needed to be done. That's up to El Salvador if they want to return him. That's not up to us. The supreme court ruled president that if as El Salvador wants to return him, this this is international matters, foreign affairs. If they wanted to return him, we would facilitate it, meaning provide a plane.
Speaker 0: So will you return
Speaker 1: him, president? You are doing a great job.
Speaker 2: Thank you.
Speaker 1: Well, just like I used to put Steve here another wait a minute. Can you just also respond to that question? Because, you know, it's asked by CNN, they always ask it with a slant, because they're totally slanted because they don't know what's happening. That's why nobody's watching them. But would you answer that question also, please?
Speaker 3: Yes. Gladly. So as Pam mentioned, there's an illegal alien from El Salvador. So with respect to you, he's a citizen of El Salvador. So it's very arrogant even for American media to suggest that we would even tell El Salvador how to handle their own citizens as a starting point.
As two immigration courts found that he was a member of MS thirteen. When president Trump declared MS thirteen to be a foreign terrorist organization, that meant that he was no longer eligible under federal law, which I'm sure you know, you're very familiar with the INA, that he was no longer eligible for any form of immigration relief in The United States. So he had a deportation we order that was valid, which meant that under our law, he's not even allowed to be present in The United States and had to be returned because of the foreign terrorist designation. This issue was then by district court judge completely inverted and a district court judge tried to tell the administration that they had to kidnap a citizen of El Salvador and fly him back here. That issue was raised to the supreme court.
And the supreme court said the district court order was unlawful and its main components were reversed nine zero unanimously stating clearly that neither secretary of state nor the president could be compelled by anybody to forcibly retrieve a citizen of El Salvador from El Salvador who, again, is a member of MS thirteen, which is I'm sure you understand, rapes little girls, murders women, murders children, is engaged in the most barbaric activities in the world. And I can promise you if he was your neighbor, you would move right away.
Speaker 0: So you don't plan to
Speaker 1: ask him to and what was the ruling that and the supreme court, Steve, was it nine to nothing?
Speaker 3: Yes. Was a nine zero. In our favor? In our favor against the district court ruling saying that no district court has the power to compel the foreign policy function of The United States. As Pam said, the ruling solely stated that if this individual at El Salvador's sole discretion was sent back to our country, that we could deport him a second time.
Speaker 1: Well, I
Speaker 3: No version of this legally ends up with him ever living here because he is a citizen of El Salvador. That is the president of El Salvador. Your questions about it per the court can only be directed to him.
Speaker 0: I I asked Can president Bukele weigh in on this? Do you plan to
Speaker 1: The United States. I I don't have the power to return him to The United States. But you can release him inside of Yeah, but I'm not releasing I mean, we're not very fond of releasing terrorists into our country. We just turned the murder capital of the world into the safest country in the Western Hemisphere, and you want us to go back into the releasing criminals so they can go back to being the murdered capital of the world. And that's that's not gonna be bad.
That's Well, they'd love to have a criminal, you know, released into I mean, I mean, there's there's a fascination. They would love it. Yeah. They're sick these are sick people. Mark, could you have something to say
Speaker 4: about Yeah. I mean, Steven, I don't understand what the confusion is. This individual is a citizen of El Salvador. He was illegally in The United States and was returned to his country. That's where you deport people back to their country of origin, except for Venezuela that wasn't refusing to take people back to places like that.
I can tell you this, mister president. No. The foreign policy of The United States is conducted by the president of The United States, not by a court. And no court in The United States has a right to conduct the foreign policy of The United States. It's that simple.
End of story.
@GuntherEagleman - Gunther Eagleman™
.@timburchett just embarrassed Kaitlan Collins for five minutes LOL No CNN pundit is safe! https://t.co/Fmqx6PhmR7
Video Transcript AI Summary
Republican Congressman Tim Burchett is leaning towards voting yes on the bill, citing its benefits for Tennesseans, including manufacturing credits and border security. He dismisses concerns about Medicaid and SNAP cuts, claiming they only target waste, abuse, and fraud, not deserving recipients. He believes work requirements should be enforced for Medicaid eligibility.
Democratic Congressman Richie Torres calls the bill a tragedy, claiming the CBO projects it will cause 12 million people to lose healthcare, slash Medicaid and children's health care by a trillion dollars, and cut SNAP by $300 billion. He says it will add trillions to the national debt.
Burchett defends a provision delaying SNAP cuts for states with high error rates, arguing it allows them to improve. He criticizes claims about the bill's debt impact, pointing to increased debt in the previous four years. He questions the CBO's non-partisanship. While some Republicans have reservations, Burchett says single-issue spending bills are preferable but not feasible now. He believes the bill will correct economic issues.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As they show up. Caitlin? Yeah. A lot of flight delays coming in. Selwyn Serfadi, thank you for that.
Two lawmakers who have made it to Washington are here with me tonight. Republican congressman Tim Burgett of Tennessee and Democratic congressman Richie Torres of New York. On not having flight delays. Congressman, what are you going to do? Are you gonna vote yes on the bill as it stands tonight, or do you have reservations like some of your colleagues over in the house?
Speaker 1: Of course, I have reservations. It's a huge piece of legislation. The thing I let mostly, though, is how it affects Tennesseans. And if it doesn't pass, then Tennesseans will automatically have a pretty substantial tax increase as in his district as well. So that working folks, things like that, the credits that are there in there for for manufacturing, I like.
I like I like the border security. I like the iron dome if we if it's done.
Speaker 0: Yeah. But a lot of people in Tennessee get Medicaid and SNAP benefits as well. Are you worried about
Speaker 1: No. I'm not. Because unless they're doing it illegally and waste abuse and fraud. That's all their cuts are. That's a misnomer.
That's what the left is putting out to scare people. And, unfortunately, that's what we do in politics, and it's wrong.
Speaker 0: What do you you mean you're saying people only people who get Medicaid illegally are gonna be affected by these cuts? I don't think that's alright. I mean, the
Speaker 1: I do. I do.
Speaker 0: Projection is it's 12,000,000 people. Are you
Speaker 1: saying 12,000,000 people or anything like that? And I've delved into those notes, and and most of them are unsubstantiated. That's you know, they they will not address the fact that illegals are on it. They will not address the fact that there's a work requirement, which I think every American, if they're capable of working, should probably not be on Medicaid. And so, yeah, we've got single moms, two kids or something like that.
No, They they should qualify for for the programs. But if we're not careful, we will destroy the program, and it will not take care of the least amongst us.
Speaker 0: Congressman Durez?
Speaker 2: The republic reconciliation bill is a tragedy for America. It's a tragedy for the working people of America. The independent bipartisan congressional budget office has said that it will cause 12,000,000 people to lose their health care. It will slash Medicaid and children's health care by a trillion dollars, which is the largest health care cut in recent American history. It will slash SNAP by $300,000,000,000, the largest food assistance cut in recent history.
It's going to add 3 to $5,000,000,000,000 to the debt, plunging our country into a debt spiral. The legislation is a catastrophe. And if you think that a trillion dollar cut amounts to preserving or protecting Medicaid, then I have the Bronx River and the Brooklyn Bridge to sell you. It's a lie. Donald Trump is lying about the impact of the legislation to the American people.
It's one thing to defund health care and food. It's something else to lie to the American people.
Speaker 0: Can you you talk about your reservations. And one thing we've heard from Republicans is you wanna get rid of waste, fraud, and abuse. Right?
Speaker 1: Correct.
Speaker 0: Do you are you comfortable then with the provision that the senate put into this to get Lisa Murkowski to vote for it? Where, basically, states that have the highest level of erroneous payouts of SNAP get a delay here. Essentially, those states that are the worst at paying out SNAP benefits or do it the the least effectively, get a delay here and essentially of how long they could they could see cuts to those provisions in terms of that. We've heard from some Republicans who say it's kind of this perverse incentive that the worse you are at this, the more you benefit from from this provision in the senate bill.
Speaker 1: I think it allows states to get in line, but also I think it's very disingenuous when you say that it's gonna add $3,000,000,000,000 to the debt in in in ten years when the last four years
Speaker 0: I didn't say that. The congressional budget office
Speaker 1: is nonpartisan. 85% of the people that work in their health care division are Democrats and have contributed to Democrats. They're number one economist
Speaker 0: It's run by a Republican.
Speaker 1: Is a Democrat.
Speaker 0: It's run by
Speaker 1: a Republican. But they it needs to be disbanded. It is a it is a relic. But the truth is under the last four years, every 100 days, we've run up a trillion dollars. And all of a sudden, you hear the Democrats and Chuck Schumer saying over the next ten years, it's gonna round up $3,000,000,000,000.
Well, where were they the last four years when we ran up over $12,000,000,000,000 in debt? That just doesn't figure. And and they're allowed to do that because their mouthpieces and the media continue to tap these lies that they say, and they just don't fit into what in the real math. And the CBO has never been a by nonpartisan organization. Nobody believes that.
Nobody believes that.
Speaker 0: Well, the guy who runs it donated to a Republican and is a Republican. But can I ask you on in terms of what you're saying about I mean, you're saying what the media is saying about this? This is Ron Johnson who had these concerns, Josh Hawley who had these concerns. Tom Tillis is saying people in his state who are deserving of Medicaid would be kicked off
Speaker 1: Outside of Tillis, they all voted for it.
Speaker 0: Well, they still criticized it, though, and said they had serious reservations
Speaker 1: about sure. There's they're gonna have criticism of it anything that's that's this large. That's that's why I think we need to go back to what we do in Tennessee, single issue spending bills, let every let every bill be accountable to the voters. But we don't do that because neither party has the guts to do it, and they know it's a wink and a nod to to stack these things up with a lot of pork. Unfortunately, we don't have that luxury with this because of our economic situation that we're in.
And I think that the the American economy has suffered the last four years. And under this bill, I think it will correct a lot of
Speaker 0: those So it sounds like you're gonna vote yes on this.
Speaker 1: I'm leaning in that direction. But yeah. But I I still have my concerns. I'm at the treasury today over a lot of the issues that I had.
Speaker 0: Look. You're leaning yes. I know house Democrats met tonight. We keep hearing the criticisms from democrats over this bill. I think the question
@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill
One year ago, CNN showed up to cover President Trump’s Pennsylvania Rally…live on air…which they had not done before. They knew. CNN is a Propaganda Stronghold for the CIA. https://t.co/Wk8VOnseLn
Video Transcript AI Summary
Secret Service whistleblowers are reportedly furious about the agency's response to security failures. Senator Josh Hawley says whistleblowers told him the lead site agent for the Butler rally was known to be inexperienced and incompetent. According to the whistleblowers, she didn't enforce security protocols, IDs weren't checked, and most agents were Homeland Security agents who had never worked a rally before.
Hawley says the site agent didn't ensure a clear line of sight for agents, and that security was a "total free for all." Whistleblowers are concerned that the agent is still in charge of security for political events and possibly investigating herself. The whistleblowers are reportedly coming forward because they are scared this will happen again. The Trump campaign was allegedly worried when she was assigned to Butler.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fox News alert. Secret Service whistleblowers are coming out of the woodwork, furious about last week's press conference where the director, Ron Roe, admitted the agency failed but wouldn't fire anyone. Trump's entire predictive detail's been an illusion. The rally in Butler was the first time the Secret Service sent countersnipers to a Trump event. And those snipers were communicating by text message without Wi Fi.
Only the locals had radios and according to the Washington Post, the Secret Service wasn't even in the same room as they were. They were in a completely different command center on the opposite side of the farm. Basically, the Secret Service was playing a big game of telephone while Crooks was stalking the grounds. Who signed off on this disastrous plan? According to whistleblowers who've spoken to senator Josh Hawley, it all comes down to the lead site agent who they claim is inexperienced and incompetent.
Senator Josh Hawley's been speaking with these whistleblowers and he joins us now. Senator, what have these whistleblowers been telling your office?
Speaker 1: Well, what they've been saying, Jesse, is that this individual, the site agent, the lead agent was known to the Trump campaign to be inexperienced, to be ineffectual, to be frankly incompetent at their job. Well, I'm also told by whistleblowers that on that day, she was not enforcing the normal security protocols. She was not checking people's IDs. She did not use secret service agents. Most of the agents there that day were not secret service agents.
They were homeland security agents. And get this, Jesse, most of them had never worked a rally before. And yet this is who she chose to staff the event with, and she didn't train them or integrate them. From top to bottom, it was a total disaster. Jesse, it is a miracle, a miracle.
Not only that Trump is alive, but that more good Americans were not killed. It's unbelievable.
Speaker 0: You're saying that the site agent in charge of this security in Butler wasn't checking IDs? What what what do you mean? She was just letting people in?
Speaker 1: That is what whistleblowers tell me is that IDs were not checked to allow individuals into secure areas, Jesse. In other words, it was a total free for all. Whistleblowers portray to me a circumstance, a a situation that was totally out of control where people were milling around including in what were supposed to be highly secure areas. Nobody knew who they were. By the way, it was also the lead site agent's job to make sure that the line of sight for where Trump was was clear, that agents could see all angles, and she didn't do that.
In fact, I'm told that the line of sight was obstructed, means that agents from different angles couldn't really see around Trump, couldn't see potential dangers to Trump. This is pretty textbook stuff, Jesse. And what whistleblowers say to me is none of it was done properly. None of it was done by the book. And frankly, when you know all that, it's amazing more people weren't killed.
This person needs to be fired as does anybody who had leadership on that day.
Speaker 0: This person is still doing security. They're still in charge of security for political events. Why isn't why aren't they sidelined and under investigation themselves?
Speaker 1: This is exactly what the whistleblowers who are coming to me, Jesse, want to know. And in fact, we know that this individual is still doing all those things because the director confirmed it. He told me under oath that, yeah, this individual is still working events. In fact, he said still doing investigations, which raises the question, is she investigating herself?
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is insane. And I'll just say this, Jesse.
Speaker 0: Sure.
Speaker 1: Whistleblowers are coming forward from the Secret Service because they can't believe what leadership is doing. They cannot believe that the Secret Service is not taking action to clear out the rock, frankly. They're scared to death this is gonna happen again, but we can't let it happen again. We've gotta get the facts.
Speaker 0: Was this site agent for Butler, was she one of these Cheadle hires? You know how Cheadle has an agenda? She just promotes people without merit. Was that person a person like that?
Speaker 1: I don't know the answer to that. All I'm told by these whistleblowers is that this individual was inexperienced, that she was known to the campaign to be frankly not very good at her job. They had concerns about this individual before the Butler rally. Again, when she was assigned to Butler, the campaign was worried. They thought, uh-oh, This has not gone well before, and my gosh.
It didn't go well that day.
Speaker 0: Alright. Well, I'm I'm very glad these whistleblowers are speaking out to your office. Please keep the public posted on on some of these developments because the more and more we hear about it, just the angrier I get. Thank you again.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
🚨WATCH: Fake News CNN cuts the feed right as Tulsi Gabbard begins exposing how far the Obama administration went to fabricate the Russia-gate hoax. https://t.co/rWTff0fLeV
@RealJamesWoods - James Woods
Seriously how do people who work at CNN sleep at night? https://t.co/Miqc7fGkHm
Video Transcript AI Summary
A picture of a male, possibly white, wearing sunglasses and a mustache, has been distributed to every police officer in New York City, particularly to search teams inside the building. This is to identify the individual among groups of people being evacuated. The goal is to prevent the person from slipping out with victims or office workers during the evacuation. They want to avoid a situation where the individual escapes within a cordon while people are being moved to a safe corridor.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who he is? They do not know who he is. They know he is a male, possibly white. He's wearing sunglasses. He appears to have a mustache.
And that picture has been distributed to every police officer in New York City, particularly has been sent to the phones of the search teams inside that building because whenever they encounter a group of people, the first thing they have to figure out is, is that individual among these people hiding among victims or pretending to be an office worker? Because one thing you don't wanna have happen is to have this kind of cordon where you're trying to evacuate people in groups as you can get them to a safe corridor and have this person slip out with them. So Yep. Yes, they have the picture and and they have distributed to everybody on the scene. Alright.
Alright. John, stay with me. I know you're obviously getting information here in real time as we're talking.
@GuntherEagleman - Gunther Eagleman™
CNN is giving the chinese military parade more positive press than they gave to President Trump's parade. That says everything. No wonder nobody gives a sht about what these crooks say anymore. Disgusting. https://t.co/iZWHHUEC9c
Video Transcript AI Summary
Live pictures show a massive parade underway in Beijing as Xi Jinping shows off his country's arsenal and military might to the world, with more than two dozen foreign leaders in attendance from Russia, North Korea, and Iran. In a speech, Xi warned that the world needs to choose, 'between peace and war.' They are commemorating the eightieth anniversary of the surrender of Japan. Xi 'has just done a review of the troops in his presidential limousine' and is 'walking up a red carpet towards the Tiananmen Gate' with Putin to his right and Kim Jong Un to his left. The SCO gathering followed diplomacy; 'The North Korean leader was not in that. He's not a member of that group, but Vladimir Putin was there,' and the message targeted 'the US' with 'bullying' and a 'cold war mentality,' as leaders urged a multipolar world order.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're watching live pictures tonight. Right now, a massive parade underway in Beijing as the Chinese president Xi Jinping is showing off his country's arsenal and military might to the world and to the move more than two dozen foreign leaders who were there in person attending this military parade that includes those from Russia, North Korea, and Iran. In a speech just a few moments ago, president Xi warned that the world needs to choose, as he put it, quote, between peace and war. Owning straight to CNN's Ivan Watson who is live on the ground in Beijing. And, obviously, Ivan, we're watching this play out and just seeing, you know, how extensive this military parade is so far.
What's clear to you from the message that China is trying to send tonight?
Speaker 1: This is a message of strength. This is a message of, victory. After all, they are commemorating the eightieth anniversary of the surrender of Japan. China was a a major battleground in World War two for eight long years, to the tune of perhaps around 20,000,000 Chinese casualties during the Japanese military's invasion and occupation of of parts of China. And this is a demonstration to, China and the world, that, China is strong.
It can protect itself, and that Xi Jinping is the ruler of this country. He has just done a review of the troops in his presidential limousine, and now we're being treated to scenes of uniformed soldiers with helmets, you know, jogging alongside tanks and other military vehicles and jumping into them. We're seeing, drones on display, and they will be part of the the parade that is at hand here. You know, Caitlin, I think on the one hand, this is a demonstration of Chinese military muscle and discipline. It's a scorching hot day here in Beijing, and the the troops are out in full uniforms and helmets, jogging, marching in unison.
But by the same token, there is a demonstration of China's friends outside of China. And I think one of the enduring images that will emerge from this is of Xi Jinping walking up a red carpet towards the Tiananmen Gate from where he and other world leaders have been reviewing this parade and walking alongside Russian president Vladimir Putin to his right, North Korean leader Kim Jong un to his left. Those two very important guests, the VIPs, and demonstrating how important they are to Xi Jinping himself by placing them front and center during, what is effectively a a Chinese celebration here.
Speaker 0: Yeah. It has so much just to be able to see these images. I mean, they're it's a pretty striking show of force just to see them all standing side by side watching this play out.
Speaker 1: It is. And and it comes after days of diplomacy. You know, just this weekend, China was hosting this regional security grouping called the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, and the North Korean leader was not in that. He's not a member of that group, but Vladimir Putin was there, as was the prime minister of India, and leaders of of, dozens of other countries. And the message there was much more pointed and directed at The US and calling out bullying in the words of the Chinese leader Xi Jinping, a cold war mentality.
These are all code words that he and the Russian president Vladimir Putin used to criticize international relations that they would argue have too long been dominated by The US effectively since the collapse of the Soviet Union, and that these two leaders have chafed at, and they have been calling for what they claim would be a more equitable world order, a multipolar world order. So, there is a lot of symbolism that we are seeing over the course of the last several days from diplomacy now to military might. Caitlin.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Ivan Watson will continue to check back in with you, keep us updated with what you're seeing on the ground in Beijing.