TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

amuse
Posted - February 10, 2025 at 2:02 PM
Saved - February 10, 2025 at 2:50 PM

@amuse - @amuse

DOGE: Biden funneled billions into far left NGOs like the Climate Justice Alliance. The CJA received $50M from the EPA under the guise of fighting climate change. The group uses the money to promote pro-Palestine and anti-Israel propaganda in the US. h/t @epaleezeldin

ILA_NewsX
Posted - February 11, 2025 at 6:11 AM
Saved - February 12, 2025 at 6:19 PM

@ILA_NewsX - I Love America News

@elonmusk @DOGE Stacey Abrams was a huge beneficiary. https://t.co/TwTGfvBddW

libsoftiktok
Posted - February 19, 2025 at 10:26 PM
Saved - February 20, 2025 at 3:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I uncovered a significant issue involving Stacey Abrams and a nonprofit called "Power Forward Communities." It received a staggering $2 billion grant despite being only a few months old and having just $100 in its account. The organization has connections to Abrams, who has ties to other nonprofits listed on their website. Additionally, she serves as senior counsel for Rewiring America, which is part of a coalition that includes Power Forward Communities. This raises serious questions about the allocation of taxpayer dollars.

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

STACEY ABRAMS SCAM UNCOVERED BY DOGE?! .@DOGE found $2 BILLION in taxpayer dollars designated for a fledgling nonprofit called "Power Forward Communities," which had close ties to Democrat Stacey Abrams. Power Forward Communities was only a few months old with just $100 in the bank when it received the $2 billion grant in 2024. On their website, they listed partnerships with two other nonprofits, both founded by Stacey Abrams. Abrams also serves as senior counsel for Rewiring America, an organization that leads a coalition of groups including Power Forward Communities.

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

SOURCE: https://freebeacon.com/trump-administration/billions-doge-found-parked-at-bank-earmarked-for-stacey-abrams-backed-green-group/

DOGE Finds $2 Billion in Taxpayer Funds Earmarked for Stacey Abrams-Linked Group DOGE found $2 billion in taxpayer funds set aside for a fledgling nonprofit linked to perennial Georgia Democratic candidate Stacey Abrams. The Environmental Protection Agency under the Biden administration awarded Power Forward Communities the grant in April 2024 as part of the agency's Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund program. Power Forward Communities received the green energy grant despite the fact that it was founded months earlier in late 2023 and never managed anywhere near the grant's dollar figure—it reported just $100 in total revenue during its first three months in operation, according to its latest tax filings. freebeacon.com
atensnut
Posted - February 20, 2025 at 2:14 AM
Saved - February 20, 2025 at 2:38 AM

@atensnut - Juanita Broaddrick

Holy Shlit!!!! WTAF?

@Bubblebathgirl - Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

Stacey Abrams caught trying to steal a gigantic $2 BILLION from taxpayers. That enormous amount of money was discovered by DOGE. The huge scandal revolves around funds earmarked for a group linked to the biggest election denier ever. It’s a gargantuan story of fiscal gluttony! https://t.co/YkUYHlDUNU

Video Transcript AI Summary
I won my election, but I didn't get the job. We were robbed. I don't think it's dangerous to say the election was rigged going into 2024, because we can back it up. It wasn't stolen from me, it was stolen from the voters. I'm never going to concede, because concession acknowledges an action is right, true, or proper, and the erosion of our democracy is not right. People are working for a party today. My election was stolen, it was not free and fair. It was stolen from the people of Georgia, from the voters. Thousands of Georgians had their voices stolen because they were not able to cast ballots, and their votes weren't counted.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I did win my election. I just didn't get to have the job. We were robbed of an election. Using the word rigged, using the word steal. Do you think it's dangerous going into 2020? I I don't because we can actually back it up. And so in response to what I believe was a stolen election. I'm not saying they stole it from me. They stole it from the voters' door. Back to when outside asked if I'm ever gonna concede. The answer is no. This is not the speech of concession. Because concession needs to acknowledge an action is right, true, or prompt. And I will not concede because the erosion of our democracy is not right. People don't. People don't. They're working for a party today. Everyone steal your election. It was not a free and fair election. I think the election was stolen from the people of Georgia. I believe it was stolen from the voters. Thousands of Georgians had their voices stolen because they were not able to cast ballots, and they cannot be guaranteed that their votes will be counted in 20
JimFergusonUK
Posted - February 20, 2025 at 8:24 AM
Saved - February 20, 2025 at 12:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I uncovered a shocking $2 billion scandal involving taxpayer funds linked to Stacey Abrams. The Department of Government Efficiency revealed that a nonprofit, which had only $100 before receiving the grant, was given this massive sum. EPA Chief Lee Zeldin expressed deep concern over how the Biden administration secretly parked $20 billion in a financial institution, avoiding oversight. This situation highlights a pattern of funneling money to politically connected groups while hardworking Americans suffer. Should Trump’s team investigate this corruption?

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

🚨 DOGE UNCOVERS $2 BILLION SCANDAL LINKED TO STACEY ABRAMS! 🚨 🔴 The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has uncovered a staggering $2 BILLION in taxpayer funds given to a fledgling nonprofit linked to Stacey Abrams—an organization that had only $100 in its bank account before receiving the grant! 🔴 EPA Chief Lee Zeldin has called the revelation “EXTREMELY CONCERNING,” exposing how the Biden administration secretly parked $20 BILLION in a financial institution before leaving office, shielding it from oversight. 🔥 THIS IS FRAUD ON A MASSIVE SCALE! The Biden administration funneled BILLIONS into a shady "green energy" slush fund, prioritizing left-wing activist groups over the American people. 🔥 📢 WHAT THIS MEANS: ⚠️ Biden’s EPA handed billions to groups with NO experience—just political connections. ⚠️ The money was strategically hidden to make it nearly impossible for Trump’s administration to reclaim it. ⚠️ Stacey Abrams & left-wing labor unions benefited while hardworking Americans footed the bill. 💥 THIS IS HOW THE SWAMP OPERATES—AND TRUMP'S TEAM IS SHUTTING IT DOWN! 💥 🚨 Should the Trump administration launch a full criminal investigation into this corruption? 🚨 https://freebeacon.com/trump-administration/billions-doge-found-parked-at-bank-earmarked-for-stacey-abrams-backed-green-group/

DOGE Finds $2 Billion in Taxpayer Funds Earmarked for Stacey Abrams-Linked Group DOGE found $2 billion in taxpayer funds set aside for a fledgling nonprofit linked to perennial Georgia Democratic candidate Stacey Abrams. The Environmental Protection Agency under the Biden administration awarded Power Forward Communities the grant in April 2024 as part of the agency's Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund program. Power Forward Communities received the green energy grant despite the fact that it was founded months earlier in late 2023 and never managed anywhere near the grant's dollar figure—it reported just $100 in total revenue during its first three months in operation, according to its latest tax filings. freebeacon.com
amuse
Posted - February 21, 2025 at 11:04 AM
Saved - February 21, 2025 at 12:38 PM

@amuse - @amuse

DOGE: @leezeldin discovered that Biden used Citibank to launder $20 billion in EPA funds for Democrat NGOs. He's working with the DOJ to get the taxpayers money back. https://t.co/eEilgRVxXZ

@amuse - @amuse

x.com/i/article/1892…

epaleezeldin
Posted - February 22, 2025 at 7:10 PM
Saved - February 22, 2025 at 9:32 PM

@epaleezeldin - Lee Zeldin

UPDATE: I just cancelled another 21 wasteful DEI and Environmental Justice grants, with the help of our amazing @DOGE team, racking up $67M more in savings! https://nypost.com/2025/02/22/us-news/doge-cuts-67-m-in-epa-grants-for-environmental-justice-groups/

Exclusive | DOGE, EPA cut $67M in grants for lefty groups pushing Biden’s ‘environmental justice’ mandate The Department of Government Efficiency is putting the kibosh on more than $67 million in EPA grant money once earmarked to push ex-President Joe Biden's “environmental justice” mandate, The Post has learned. nypost.com
JoshWalkos
Posted - February 24, 2025 at 7:31 PM
Saved - February 24, 2025 at 9:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In April 2024, the Biden administration awarded the non-profit “Power Forward Communities,” linked to Stacey Abrams, a $2 billion grant through the EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, despite its reported revenue of only $100 in its initial three months. Launched in October 2023, PFC includes various nonprofits and aims to promote equity. The EPA allocated $20 billion to eight groups via Citibank, allowing limited federal oversight. I view this as another instance of mismanagement and misuse of taxpayer funds tied to ideologically driven policies.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The Biden administration awarded the Stacy Abrams linked non-profit “Power Forward Communities” a $2 billion grant in April 2024 via the EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, despite the coalition reporting only $100 in revenue during its first three months of operation. PFC launched in October 2023 as a coalition of nonprofits, including Rewiring America (a climate advocacy group), the AFL-CIO, and United Way. Stacey Abrams’ involvement stemmed from her position as senior counsel at Rewiring America, framing it as a “tool for equity”. The EPA allocated $20 billion to eight groups via Citibank, bypassing direct federal oversight. PFC was given 21 days to distribute funds and 90 days for budget training requirements. This was undoubtedly a democrat slush fund and yet more fraud, waste and abuse at the expense of taxpayers. Just like everything else connected to “climate change”, DEI, or any other ideologically motivated policy.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Link to Grant: https://www.usaspending.gov/search/?hash=ec72e1ad8fc708362f95ebfc06c15113 Link to Story: https://www.yahoo.com/news/biden-sent-2-billion-stacey-140049580.html?utm

Biden sent $2 billion to Stacey Abrams-linked group in green energy 'scheme,' EPA says The Environmental Protection Agency found that the Biden administration gave $2 billion to a climate group linked to Stacey Abrams. yahoo.com
LizMacDonaldFOX
Posted - March 5, 2025 at 6:47 PM
Saved - March 6, 2025 at 4:13 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find it disturbing that the Biden and Obama Democrats have created what I call a "popup nonprofit shell" to access taxpayer money for initiatives like climate change and illegal immigration. The Climate United Fund, which received the largest nonprofit grant in history—$7 billion—was launched just five months before receiving this funding. Its tax returns reveal questionable spending, with little transparency on how the funds will be used. The organization has ties to several Democratic insiders, raising further concerns about its legitimacy and operations.

@LizMacDonaldFOX - Elizabeth MacDonald

This is disturbing – Biden and Obama Democrats created a new beast, the “popup nonprofit shell” they suddenly launch to take in your taxpayer money supposedly for things like climate change and illegal immigration. Major front for taxpayer abuse with accusations of grift growing by the hour. Never saw it like this in decades covering IRS/taxes.   Check out the tax returns for one of these popup NGO shells, the Climate United Fund which got the biggest nonprofit grant in history out of Biden’s massive climate slush funds.   Kamala Harris and Biden’s EPA chief Michael Regan gave $7 billion total to the suddenly created Climate United Fund in April 2024 after it launched just five months earlier in November 30, 2022 when Its tax returns show it started with a tiny $547K in revs. But it spent a massive $451K of that $547k in just two months in 2023, a quarter of that on legal fees and the majority $323K mysteriously blown on no one knows what because its tax returns don’t say.   It has no stipulated plans for how it will spend your $7B in tax $$, just ephemeral solar projects in Idaho, Arkansas, and Oregon that amount to only about $50M total, a fraction of the $7B. It also gave money out of that $7b to Power Forward Communities linked to Stacey Abrams.   It has little to no details on how much its officers get paid that you typically see on NGO 990s, in fact virtually no details, red flags that it’s a shell. It supposedly is a partnership betw Dem insiders at investment firm Calvert Impact Capital, Community Preservation Corp. and a group called “Self-Help” (irony noted).   Beth Bafford is its CEO, a former “special assistant” in Obama’s OMB and a regional field director for the Obama Campaign.   As we tweeted about a month ago, it has ties to Democratic Party of California chairman and California State Treasurer Phil Angelides, Obama’s Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx, United Farm Workers of America co-founder Dolores Huerta and Patrice Willoughby of the Congressional Black Caucus.   Judge Glock, the Director of Research and Senior Fellow at the Manhattan Institute, noted on X that the Climate United Fund got your $7B ater submitting a small 49-page report. That was all it took. @doge @whitehouse @PressSec @x @mtgreenee @SenJoniErnst @realDonaldTrump #DOGE #DOGEGOV #Trump #spending #DOGECAUCUS

themarketswork
Posted - March 5, 2025 at 8:51 PM
Saved - March 9, 2025 at 2:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The popup NGO shell company issue is escalating and may become a significant story. It appears these entities were created to exploit taxpayer-funded programs, with the Climate United Fund being a prime example. Launched just months before receiving a massive $7 billion, it shows troubling financial practices, including high legal fees and vague spending plans. Ties to prominent Democratic figures raise further concerns. Trump's EPA Administrator is now investigating this fund, highlighting the need for financial scrutiny of these organizations and their connections to federal programs.

@themarketswork - Jeff Carlson

This popup NGO shell company story is only going to get bigger. It may end up becoming the story. Looks like this may have been one of the primary vehicles to take advantage of the giant taxpayer-funded slush funds created by Biden—or whoever was running him. This is more than Grant Laundering. This is Program Laundering. And it looks like Obama's fingerprints are all over it. Hopefully @elonmusk & @DOGE are looking into this. @AGPamBondi as well.

@LizMacDonaldFOX - Elizabeth MacDonald

This is disturbing – Biden and Obama Democrats created a new beast, the “popup nonprofit shell” they suddenly launch to take in your taxpayer money supposedly for things like climate change and illegal immigration. Major front for taxpayer abuse with accusations of grift growing by the hour. Never saw it like this in decades covering IRS/taxes.   Check out the tax returns for one of these popup NGO shells, the Climate United Fund which got the biggest nonprofit grant in history out of Biden’s massive climate slush funds.   Kamala Harris and Biden’s EPA chief Michael Regan gave $7 billion total to the suddenly created Climate United Fund in April 2024 after it launched just five months earlier in November 30, 2022 when Its tax returns show it started with a tiny $547K in revs. But it spent a massive $451K of that $547k in just two months in 2023, a quarter of that on legal fees and the majority $323K mysteriously blown on no one knows what because its tax returns don’t say.   It has no stipulated plans for how it will spend your $7B in tax $$, just ephemeral solar projects in Idaho, Arkansas, and Oregon that amount to only about $50M total, a fraction of the $7B. It also gave money out of that $7b to Power Forward Communities linked to Stacey Abrams.   It has little to no details on how much its officers get paid that you typically see on NGO 990s, in fact virtually no details, red flags that it’s a shell. It supposedly is a partnership betw Dem insiders at investment firm Calvert Impact Capital, Community Preservation Corp. and a group called “Self-Help” (irony noted).   Beth Bafford is its CEO, a former “special assistant” in Obama’s OMB and a regional field director for the Obama Campaign.   As we tweeted about a month ago, it has ties to Democratic Party of California chairman and California State Treasurer Phil Angelides, Obama’s Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx, United Farm Workers of America co-founder Dolores Huerta and Patrice Willoughby of the Congressional Black Caucus.   Judge Glock, the Director of Research and Senior Fellow at the Manhattan Institute, noted on X that the Climate United Fund got your $7B ater submitting a small 49-page report. That was all it took. @doge @whitehouse @PressSec @x @mtgreenee @SenJoniErnst @realDonaldTrump #DOGE #DOGEGOV #Trump #spending #DOGECAUCUS

@themarketswork - Jeff Carlson

https://t.co/8k8KfgTqAc

@themarketswork - Jeff Carlson

Trump's EPA Administrator, Lee Zeldin, is already going after the $7 billion that was "given" to the Climate United Fund. Hopefully it's time for some financial forensics. Great reporting by @LizMacDonaldFOX As noted previously, this story is only likely to grow. It certainly deserves to. It appears that these "popup NGO shell companies" were created to launder money from federal programs directly, becoming the program equivalent of a DAF (which can be used to launder grant money) between a federal program (that's really a government slush fund) and the sea of NGOs swirling around it. It will be very interesting to see how widespread the use of these popup NGO shell companies actually was. And which federal programs they were able to tap into. The great @ClimateAudit has done a thread on this which I'll attach to this post.

@LizMacDonaldFOX - Elizabeth MacDonald

Kamala Harris and Biden’s EPA chief Michael Regan gave $7B total to the suddenly created Climate United Fund in April 2024 after it launched just five months earlier in November *2023* not 2022. I’m so sorry about that — Its tax returns show it started with a tiny $547K in revs.… https://t.co/Yft1wb4GkK

elonmusk
Posted - March 5, 2025 at 10:34 PM
Saved - March 5, 2025 at 11:37 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Major problem

@LizMacDonaldFOX - Elizabeth MacDonald

This is disturbing – Biden and Obama Democrats created a new beast, the “popup nonprofit shell” they suddenly launch to take in your taxpayer money supposedly for things like climate change and illegal immigration. Major front for taxpayer abuse with accusations of grift growing by the hour. Never saw it like this in decades covering IRS/taxes.   Check out the tax returns for one of these popup NGO shells, the Climate United Fund which got the biggest nonprofit grant in history out of Biden’s massive climate slush funds.   Kamala Harris and Biden’s EPA chief Michael Regan gave $7 billion total to the suddenly created Climate United Fund in April 2024 after it launched just five months earlier in November 30, 2022 when Its tax returns show it started with a tiny $547K in revs. But it spent a massive $451K of that $547k in just two months in 2023, a quarter of that on legal fees and the majority $323K mysteriously blown on no one knows what because its tax returns don’t say.   It has no stipulated plans for how it will spend your $7B in tax $$, just ephemeral solar projects in Idaho, Arkansas, and Oregon that amount to only about $50M total, a fraction of the $7B. It also gave money out of that $7b to Power Forward Communities linked to Stacey Abrams.   It has little to no details on how much its officers get paid that you typically see on NGO 990s, in fact virtually no details, red flags that it’s a shell. It supposedly is a partnership betw Dem insiders at investment firm Calvert Impact Capital, Community Preservation Corp. and a group called “Self-Help” (irony noted).   Beth Bafford is its CEO, a former “special assistant” in Obama’s OMB and a regional field director for the Obama Campaign.   As we tweeted about a month ago, it has ties to Democratic Party of California chairman and California State Treasurer Phil Angelides, Obama’s Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx, United Farm Workers of America co-founder Dolores Huerta and Patrice Willoughby of the Congressional Black Caucus.   Judge Glock, the Director of Research and Senior Fellow at the Manhattan Institute, noted on X that the Climate United Fund got your $7B ater submitting a small 49-page report. That was all it took. @doge @whitehouse @PressSec @x @mtgreenee @SenJoniErnst @realDonaldTrump #DOGE #DOGEGOV #Trump #spending #DOGECAUCUS

elonmusk
Posted - March 5, 2025 at 10:43 PM
Saved - March 6, 2025 at 1:19 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Major fraud

@themarketswork - Jeff Carlson

This popup NGO shell company story is only going to get bigger. It may end up becoming the story. Looks like this may have been one of the primary vehicles to take advantage of the giant taxpayer-funded slush funds created by Biden—or whoever was running him. This is more than Grant Laundering. This is Program Laundering. And it looks like Obama's fingerprints are all over it. Hopefully @elonmusk & @DOGE are looking into this. @AGPamBondi as well.

@LizMacDonaldFOX - Elizabeth MacDonald

This is disturbing – Biden and Obama Democrats created a new beast, the “popup nonprofit shell” they suddenly launch to take in your taxpayer money supposedly for things like climate change and illegal immigration. Major front for taxpayer abuse with accusations of grift growing…

libsoftiktok
Posted - March 6, 2025 at 6:21 AM
Saved - March 6, 2025 at 11:07 AM

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

People need to be prosecuted and go to jail for this. It’s pure corruption and theft. You should be infuriated.

@nypost - New York Post

Exclusive | $375B EPA slush fund handled by John Podesta gave billions to charities founded only months earlier https://trib.al/gemu04j

Exclusive | $375B EPA slush fund handled by John Podesta gave billions to charities founded only months earlier The Biden administration funneled at least $20 billion dollars into environmental groups, most of which had only recently been founded, The Post has discovered. nypost.com
JesseBWatters
Posted - March 7, 2025 at 2:02 AM
Saved - March 7, 2025 at 3:31 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I exposed the GREEN SLUSH FUND, revealing that $20 billion was allocated to 8 NGOs towards the end of the Biden administration. Many of these organizations were established solely to receive this funding, benefiting Democrat donors and friends of Biden and Obama.

@JesseBWatters - Jesse Watters

EXCLUSIVE: @LeeMZeldin exposes the GREEN SLUSH FUND. $20 billion given to 8 NGOs towards the end of the @JoeBiden administration. Many of them were created JUST to get this money. And the money was going to Democrat donors and Biden and @BarackObama’s friends. Zeldin says that with the right connections, people were getting billions of your dollars.

Video Transcript AI Summary
This is a green slush fund. The Biden administration parked $20 billion in an outside bank, giving it to eight NGOs, many created just to get this money. The EPA entered into an agreement with these entities, designed to tie the government's hands, so we don't know where the money is going. Only about 5% actually goes towards the environment. One CEO, serving on the White House Environmental Justice Council, received $20 million. Account control agreements were amended to reduce EPA oversight. The Justice Department and FBI are working with us, and we must ensure accountability. There should be zero tolerance for wasted money.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Lee Zeldin, Trump's EPA administrator. Is this a kickback? Is it theft? Is it graft? What would you call it? Speaker 1: All of the above. It's a green slush fund. $20,000,000,000 parked in outside bank towards the end of the Biden administration given to just eight NGOs. You just named a bunch of them. These NGOs were created for the first time, many of them just to get this money, and they're pass throughs. And so the EPA entered into this account control agreement with these entities. Treasury enters into a financial agent agreement with the bank, and they design it to tie the EPA's hands behind their back, to tie the federal government's hands behind its back. So when the money goes through the NGOs to subgrantees, many of them also pass throughs. We don't know where it's going. We don't have the proper amount of of oversight. And as you pointed out, it's going to people who are in the Obama and Biden administrations. It's going to donors. It's not going directly. As you pointed out, thankfully, you did, it's not going directly to remediate that environmental issue to deliver clean air, land, and water. It's billions, tens of billions of dollars going through their friends. Speaker 0: Well, they're gonna say they didn't steal it. They're just gonna say they got paid salaries, and then they donated it to some other subcontractor who got paid salaries, and it eventually went to some kid to pick up litter. Right? Because, like, at the end of this, what's it like, 5% of this money actually goes towards the environment? How much actually goes towards the environment after it's been just stripped out for salaries? Speaker 1: Right. And stripped out for salaries of middleman after middleman going through these multiple added layers. I'll give you an example. On the other end of this, there was one CEO who was serving on the White House Environmental Justice Council for the Biden administration. While she was serving on this council, she was CEO of an organization that applied for and received $20,000,000. So some people were able to, with the right connections, be on the the receiving end of billions of dollars. Others on the other end of this getting tens of millions of dollars and the federal government not having oversight. And, you know, I just mentioned the account control agreements that were entered into EPA and these prime recipients. They were amending the account control agreements right up to the inauguration. Oh, They were amended account control agreements we found January 13. Speaker 0: So they were scrambling before you guys got in there and and some tires. Speaker 1: They amended it. So so Yeah. They amended these account control agreements to reduce EPA oversight and to make it easier for them to pass through the money without getting caught. So you caught them. Speaker 0: And have you kicked this over to Pam Bondi at justice? Speaker 1: Yeah. The justice department and FBI have been working very closely with us. They've been working hard on this. My conversations with the attorney general, she seems very focused and motivated. Same thing when I had an opportunity to speak to our our great new FBI director. We have to ensure that there's accountability here, and we have to make sure that the federal government reestablishes oversight. We can't have we can't afford as a country to have this kind of money wasted. We should have zero tolerance for even a penny of waste and abuse. Wow. Mean, there should be no way that tens of billions are going up. One Speaker 0: a lot of scandals in the Biden administration, but this seems like a whopper. Glad you found it out. Lee Zellman, we really appreciate it. Let's get to the bottom of it. Thanks, Jesse.
amuse
Posted - March 8, 2025 at 12:11 PM
Saved - March 8, 2025 at 7:25 PM

@amuse - @amuse

DOGE: Stacey Abrams told MSBNC's Chris Hayes that the Biden EPA gave her $2 billion to buy people new home appliances to reduce electric bills. https://t.co/lOrGThdyQC

Video Transcript AI Summary
The irony of the attacks is that the program in question aims to lower costs for people. In 2023 and 2024, I led a program called Vitalizing De Soda in a small town in South Georgia. We demonstrated that replacing inefficient appliances with efficient ones lowers costs. We succeeded, with 75% of the community now benefiting from lower bills. One woman's bill was cut in half, from $180 to $98. Based on our program's success, a coalition of organizations approached the EPA, proposing to expand the initiative to millions more Americans, investing in lowering costs nationwide. The EPA approved the proposal.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of the ironies of the attack on you, and I'm gonna play what he did, was that my understanding is the the the program at the source of this whole thing is a program to lower cost for people. Do I have that top line correct? Speaker 1: You you have it absolutely right. Speaker 0: Okay. So I'm gonna I'm gonna play what he had to say, and then I'm gonna ask you to explain what the program is that was such an obvious ludicrous laugh line for the Republicans there. Take a listen. Speaker 2: $1,900,000,000 to recently created decarbonization of homes committee headed up, and we know she's involved. Just at the last moment, the money was passed over by a woman named Stacey Abrams. Have you ever heard of her? Speaker 0: Okay. So the so what what is this organization? What is your relation to to it, and what does it do? Speaker 1: In 2023 and 2024, I led a program called Vitalizing De Soda. We worked in a tiny town in South Georgia to demonstrate that by replacing energy inefficient appliances with efficient appliances, you can lower your costs. And in fact, we accomplished that. For 75% of the community, they got appliances that are lowering their bills right now. We have one woman who saw her electric bill cut in half from $180 to $98 That's what we delivered. And based on that program, a coalition of organizations famous organizations came together and said to the EPA, if we can do this here, we can do this for millions more Americans. Let us invest the money of America in lowering the cost for Americans. And the EPA said, okay. Great. Go for it.
WallStreetApes
Posted - March 9, 2025 at 6:18 AM
Saved - March 9, 2025 at 11:43 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find it absolutely insane that Glenn Beck revealed Stacey Abrams’ organization, which raised only $100, received $2 billion from taxpayers. He pointed out that the Biden-Harris administration funneled $7 billion to the United Climate Fund, part of a larger $20 billion initiative, with ties to Abrams and no transparency. An EPA official even claimed this was an insurance policy against Trump winning, indicating it was a desperate cash dump. Now, the government is clawing back the funds stashed at Citibank, which I see as calculated theft, not incompetence.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Absolutely insane. Glenn Beck reveals before Stacy Abrams’ organization received $2 billion from taxpayers, her organization was only able to raise $100 $100….. and then received $2 BILLION Says Elon Musk’s DOGE is going after the following Democrat scams: - April, 2024, the Biden-Harris administration via the EPA handed over $7 billion of your money to a ghost called the United Climate Fund. This was all part of a 20 billion jackpot from the Greenhouse Gas reduction Fund that was tacked in and tucked in - Then the mask slips off. We find out that they were funneling cash to power forward communities. That thing is tied to Stacey Abrams. No transparency on that. No accountability. It's just a shell. She had only raised a hundred dollars. That's all she could raise for her own organization. - In December, it was (James O’Keefe) that caught an EPA official spilling the truth on this one. He said this was an insurance policy against Trump winning — So all it was a desperate cash dump before the clock ran out. (8 Major NGO’s received the lion share of the money) Now under the Department of Government Deficient DOGE, they blew the lid off of this thing. The $20 billion was stashed at Citibank. It's being clawed back now by the government. It isn't incompetence, it's calculated theft.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
In April 2024, the Biden-Harris administration, through the EPA, allocated $7 billion to the United Climate Fund, part of a larger $20 billion Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund hidden within the Inflation Reduction Act. This money was funneled to Power Forward Communities, connected to Stacey Abrams, lacking transparency and accountability. An EPA official revealed this as an "insurance policy" against Trump winning the election, indicating a rushed cash dump. The $20 billion was stashed at Citibank but is now being reclaimed by the government. This isn't incompetence; it's calculated theft.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: April 2024, the Biden Harris administration via the EPA handed over $7,000,000,000 of your money to a ghost called the United Climate Fund. This was all part of a 20,000,000,000 jackpot from the greenhouse gas reduction fund. That was tacked in and tucked in so you couldn't really find it in the so called inflation reduction act that had nothing to do with reducing inflation. Nothing. Then the mask slips off. We find out that they were funneling cash to power forward communities. That thing is tied to Stacey Abrams. No transparency on that. No accountability. It's just a shell. She had only raised a hundred dollars. That's all she could raise for her own organization. In December, it was project Veritas that caught an EPA official spilling the truth on this one. He said this was an insurance policy against Trump winning. Now what does that mean? So all it was was a desperate cash dump before the clock ran out. Now under the, you know, department of government officials, Doge, they blew the lid off of this thing. The $20,000,000,000 was stashed at Citibank. It's being clawed back now by the government. It isn't incompetence. It's calculated theft.
BelannF
Posted - March 9, 2025 at 11:51 AM
Saved - March 9, 2025 at 2:07 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've heard about the $20 billion that Biden directed to newly created NGOs through the EPA. I'm questioning whether it actually reached the donors. It seems the Biden administration made last-minute changes to account controls to avoid detection of their actions.

@BelannF - BelannF

YOU'VE HEARD ABOUT THE $20 BILLION BIDEN FUNNELED TO THE NEWLY CREATED NGOs WITH THE EPA AGENCY. Did it go to the donors in the end? Biden administration amended the account controls with an amendment right up to the end of the Biden administration, so they wouldn't get caught doing what they were doing.

julie_kelly2
Posted - March 19, 2025 at 12:40 PM
Saved - March 19, 2025 at 2:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Judge Chutkan has temporarily halted EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin's cancellation of $20 billion in Biden-era climate grants held at Citibank, just days before the 2024 election. She also stopped the transfer of remaining funds back to the EPA as ordered by Zeldin. Citibank must continue disbursing funds to various climate nonprofits, including one linked to Stacey Abrams, despite the questionable nature of this arrangement and ongoing investigations by the DOJ and EPA IG. I provide further details in my explainer.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

As I predicted, Judge Chutkan unbelievably halts for now EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin cancellation of Biden era climate grants totally $20 billion sheltered at Citibank a few days before the 2024 election. She also halts transfer of remaining funds back to EPA as Zeldin ordered. For now, Citibank will have to continue paying out funds requested by these sham climate nonprofits including one tied to Stacey Abrams and one formed in 2023 that received $7 BILLION in taxpayer dollars in April 2024. This despite the outrageous nature of the arrangement—hiding $20 billion at a bank away from Congressional oversight—and the fact the slush fund is under investigation by DOJ and EPA IG. Hope John Roberts is happy!

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

My explainer here. https://open.substack.com/pub/juliekelly/p/the-real-scandal-behind-the-latest?r=4yy1i&utm_medium=ios

The Real Scandal Behind the Latest DOJ Defection The resignation of a top official with the U.S. Attorney's Office in Washington appears to be more partisanship by a longtime DOJ apparatchik tied to Democrats and a cover-up of a major scandal. declassified.live
epaleezeldin
Posted - March 27, 2025 at 2:27 PM
Saved - March 27, 2025 at 10:13 PM

@epaleezeldin - Lee Zeldin

I have terminated the $2 BILLION Biden EPA grant to this Stacey Abrams-linked NGO. The DOJ/FBI are investigating and the money has been frozen. It is insane that the Biden Admin would give $2B to an organization that previously only received $100!

@RapidResponse47 - Rapid Response 47

👀 https://t.co/yEOUXpxLOT

amuse
Posted - May 5, 2025 at 5:53 PM
Saved - May 5, 2025 at 8:08 PM

@amuse - @amuse

DOGE: Why is Senator Sheldon Whitehouse such a huge critic of DOGE and Elon Musk? Turns out he's been funneling millions to an NGO that pays his wife millions. His wife isn't paid by just one government funded NGO but two including the Atlantic Council. The corruption is deep.

TCNetworkFans
Posted - May 23, 2025 at 11:33 AM
Saved - May 24, 2025 at 1:13 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared my thoughts on why Democrats opposed DOGE's involvement with government funds, suggesting it was due to their attempts to hide billions in taxpayer money before Trump took office. I highlighted a 76-day period between Trump's election and Biden's departure, pointing out that the Department of Energy disbursed $93 billion from the Loan Program Office, which is more than double the amount distributed in the previous 15 years.

@TCNetworkFans - Tucker Carlson Network 🇺🇸 Fan Account

Want to know why Democrats didn't want DOGE poking around in government funds? Because they were stealing and trying to conceal BILLIONS in taxpayer funds before Donald Trump took office. “The 76-day period you're talking about, that's the period between the time that President Trump was elected and President Biden left office. How much taxpayer money went out the door of the Department of Energy? From the Loan Program Office in Loans and Commitments $93 billion. Well over twice as much as in the previous 15 years”

Video Transcript AI Summary
During a 76-day period between President Trump's election and President Biden leaving office, the Department of Energy's loan program issued $93 billion in loans and commitments, more than double the amount from the previous 15 years. The loans were sometimes given to entities lacking business plans or financial solvency. The department is now reviewing these loans and grants for theft and incompetence. Some applicants presented half-baked ideas, promising plans after receiving funds. The department's budget increased from $60 billion to $160 billion since fiscal year 2021. The department is reducing its headcount by thousands, which the secretary believes is common-sense business. The secretary credits President Trump for empowering departments to make necessary changes to better serve taxpayers and consumers.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister secretary, I wanna go back to some of your earlier testimony to be sure I heard it correctly. The seventy six day period you're talking about, that's the period between the time that president Trump was elected and president Biden left office. Is that right? That is correct. And during that short period of time, seventy six days, how much taxpayer money went out the door of the Department of Energy? Speaker 1: From the loan program office in loans and commitments, $93,000,000,000, well over twice as much as in Speaker 0: the previous fifteen years. So how do you vet and do due diligence on a loan in seventy six days. One loan, much less $93,000,000,000. How do you do it? Speaker 1: I I think it's probably pretty clear it wasn't done in many cases. As I mentioned, yeah, I'm told I'm holding back clearly in place stuff. There is lots of funds that have gone out the door and commitments that were made from businesses that provided no business plan, no numbers about their own financial solvency or how this project So you're telling Speaker 0: me that the Department of Energy in the seventy six day period before their boss was gonna leave office, gave our loan money to to entities that had no business plan? Correct. No financials? Speaker 1: Correct. A number of those were not were before the seventy six day period as well. That's that's I've I've come in with great concern about how this institution, this great American institution has been run and how American tax payer money has been handled. I'm sorry everyone's upset that we're taking some time to do it, but what we've seen I'm not upset. Shows I'm Speaker 0: not upset. Could it be that a lot of people say you haven't returned your calls? Could it be that you and your your colleagues have returned the calls, but the people calling just didn't like the answer? Could that be a possibility? Speaker 1: I'm not I'm not I'm not aware of that. You know, I give my cell phone number to any senator that wants it, and I return my calls. Speaker 0: I I I I I mean, is your is your department gone dark? Somebody said your department's gone dark. Is it dark over there? Speaker 1: Doesn't look it doesn't look dark behind me. Speaker 0: I don't see any of you sitting on your hands. Somebody made that charge. I see everybody's hands. Let me ask you something else, mister secretary. Does does anybody ever come to the Department of Energy to get some of this free money and lie to you? Speaker 1: I have not experienced that, but I I think it's a a reasonable assumption that that has happened. Does anybody ever come to you is or is it conceivable that some of these folks that heard about this free money came to you with a half baked idea? I think it's very conceivable. In fact, I've seen such plans that were half Speaker 0: baked with didn't have a business plan. Right? Speaker 1: Correct. A promise to develop one, to find a location Speaker 0: the money, and I'll develop the plan later. Speaker 1: Correct. And and now Speaker 0: you're going back through not money that's already been contracted, but you're going back through and checking each one of these loans and these grants to make sure there was no stealing, aren't you? We are. We are. Make sure there was no incompetence, aren't you? Is that correct? Speaker 1: We're looking at that, and and, yeah, my my blood pressure is rising right now just thinking about what we have seen and what did happen at Speaker 0: the moment. Gonna tell some of these boondoggles no, aren't you? Speaker 1: That's correct. And they're gonna be upset, aren't they? That's correct. And they ought to Speaker 0: be upset, shouldn't they? I don't think Speaker 1: they should be upset. I think they should be ashamed. Speaker 0: I am it's rare that I'm speechless, but I wanna be sure I understood. The people running the Department of Energy for president Biden's administration shoveled $93,000,000,000, not million, $93,000,000,000 out the door in seventy six days, and it just happened to be the time between when president Trump was elected and president Biden, their boss, was leaving. Is that right? Speaker 1: It is correct and distasteful. Confidence undermining. My god. Speaker 0: Look. I hope you take whatever time you need to go through all of these projects penny by penny. I mean, I I've heard this testimony today. Well, it'll cost jobs in my state. If somebody steals $50,000,000 and goes and spends the money in their state, that's that's gonna stimulate the economy, isn't it? Yes. It will. But that's still stealing, isn't it? And it's still illegal, isn't it? Yes. I mean, they were spending money at the Department of Energy like it was ditch water. Their budget went from $60,000,000,000 to a hundred and $60,000,000,000 since fiscal year two thousand twenty one. It just sounds to me like like there were a lot of people coming to the Department of Energy who had all four feet and their snout in the trough. And I hope if you I hope you'll turn down the boondoggles and refer the thieves to the Department of Justice. We will indeed. Speaker 1: Senator, the one complication in there too is mixed in there are good companies doing good things honestly with credible plans. And you're trying to separate the wheat from the chaff. Yes. That's what we're trying to do. That's our job, and we're doing it. But there's there's a lot of chaff. Speaker 0: Let me ask you one final question. Let me go back to how many employees you have. Now there have been some allegations today that that that you've you've cut tens of thousands of employees. Is that accurate? Speaker 1: Well, I think the allegations were thousands, and we we our headcount will ultimately be reduced by thousands, but we are doing it slowly. Thousand now? Speaker 0: Yes. And you think you can do it with fewer than 16,000? Speaker 1: Correct. What's wrong with that? I think it's just common sense business. Speaker 0: Yeah. Businesses do it every day in the real world. American taxpayers deserve it. That's never happened in in the federal government. I mean, it's easier to divorce your spouse than to get rid of a federal employee up here. That's not the way the world works, is it, mister secretary? It's not the Speaker 1: way the world should work. And I give enormous credit to president Trump who had the boldness to say if there's a right thing that needs to be done and it's difficult, please do it. And so, yes, this is new territory. This is not what happens normally in the federal government, but it is what needs to happen periodically in the federal government. And I give the credit to president Trump who's willing to take the heat and has set the departments free, make the changes you need to make to better serve American taxpayers and American consumers. And, across his administration, that's what's being done. Alright. On that Speaker 0: note, I just wanted to clear that up, mister secretary, because I I you know, I I don't know you to be a person who doesn't return his phone call.
Real_RobN
Posted - May 26, 2025 at 1:53 AM
Saved - May 27, 2025 at 5:38 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discussed the failure of Republicans to codify DOGE cuts and questioned whether USAID's DOGE team has found any evidence of radical left Democrats, like Maxine Waters and Nancy Pelosi, receiving money directly from USAID. I believe that USAID and NGOs are intertwined with Congress, leading to issues like bribery and money laundering. I also referenced Elon Musk's confidence that a significant amount of this money returns to the U.S., suggesting that many members of Congress are unusually wealthy.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Here is why Republicans failed to codify DOGE cuts. Has USAID’s DOGE team found any evidence that any of the radical left Democrats — such as Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, Chuck Schumer, or Nancy Pelosi — have received money directly from USAID? Absolutely: USAID + NGOs (Government funded non-governmental organizations) = U.S. Congress—bribery, money laundering and racketeering. @elonmusk “I am highly confident that a bunch of that money comes back to the U.S. and lands in the pockets of those you just mentioned.. I’ll just say there’s a lot of strangely wealthy members of Congress.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker was asked if there is evidence that Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, and Chuck Schumer have received money directly from USAID. The speaker responded that taxpayer money is sent to government organizations, then to NGOs, which are government-funded but not governed by U.S. laws. Money is sent overseas to NGOs and the speaker is confident that some of it returns to the U.S. and ends up with the aforementioned politicians. The speaker states that it's not a direct route, but that some members of Congress are strangely wealthy, accumulating millions while earning significantly less annually, which is unexplainable. The speaker says they are going to try to figure it out and stop it from happening.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My question is about USAID. Has the Doge team found any evidence that any of the radical left Democrats like Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, Chuck Schumer have received money directly from USAID? And if so, will we be hearing about that evidence anytime soon? Speaker 1: Yeah. So the the there is a massive amount of corruption, it it is circuitous. So what happens is there's money that obviously it's your taxpayer money that that is then sent to various government organizations who then send it to to NGOs, which which an NGO is a non governmental organization, but obviously, it's a government funded non governmental organization, it's just an organization, it's just the government. And effectively, there's a giant fraud loophole, which is that the the government can send money to an NGO that is then no longer governed by the law laws of The United States. So they'll they'll send the money overseas to one NGO, then they'll go through a bunch of bunch of them. And then I'm highly confident that a bunch of that money then comes back to The United States and lands in the pockets of the people you just mentioned. But it is a circuitous route. It's not like it it it doesn't go directly. But let's just say that there's a lot of strangely wealthy members of congress where I'm I just can't I'm I'm trying to connect the dots of how do they become rich while earning how do they get 20,000,000 if they're earning 200,000 a year? Sounds that's how how do I just nobody can explain that. So so so something's yeah. We we we we're gonna try to figure it out and and and and certainly stop it from happening. So
RodDMartin
Posted - June 28, 2025 at 2:39 PM
Saved - June 29, 2025 at 1:43 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Trump administration has launched an audit of all SBA contracts dating back 15 years following a massive fraud scandal at USAID, which was revealed to be a hub for bribery and corruption. The DOJ uncovered a $550 million bribery scheme involving USAID officials who accepted cash and gifts to manipulate contracts for favored vendors. SBA Administrator Kelly Loeffler is overseeing a comprehensive audit to address systemic failures and ensure accountability. The administration is committed to dismantling these corrupt practices.

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

🚨 Trump Admin Takes Action After Massive Fraud Uncovered at Agency Dems Tried to Protect from DOGE 🚨 Democrats SCREAMED when DOGE auditors came to USAID. It didn't take long to figure out why. Now the SBA is auditing ALL contracts going back 15 YEARS. THREAD🧵

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

2/ USAID turned out to be a giant global Democrat slush fund. And they couldn't even be honest with each other! DOJ just exposed a $550 MILLION bribery scandal there! Four USAID officers took BRIBES for 10 YEARS to rig foreign aid contracts worth more than half a billion.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Four people are pleading guilty in a half-billion-dollar bribery scandal involving USAID. According to the Justice Department, USAID official Roderick Watson sold his influence starting in 2013. Contractors Walter Barnes and Daryl Britt funneled payoffs through subcontractor Paul Young. Barnes' company kept receiving federal funds, including $5,000 for human resources consulting and a contract worth up to $800,000,000 after suing the government. The Justice Department's Matthew r Gagliotti stated that the scheme violated the public trust by corrupting the federal government's procurement process. Some suggest USAID funneled taxpayer dollars into ideological projects and that the agency needs to be redone. The Justice Department says this kind of fraud erodes public trust.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, four people are pleading guilty, all part of a half billion dollar bribery scandal involving USAID. Mike Emanuel has the story from Washington. Speaker 1: Bill, good morning. The scheme involving cash, NBA tickets, and a country club wedding. According to the justice department, USAID official Roderick Watson sold his influence starting back in 2013. Contractors Walter Barnes and Daryl Britt funneled payoffs through subcontractor Paul Young to hide their tracks. It doesn't end there. Barnes' company working in conjunction with another firm kept receiving federal funds, $5,000 for human resources consulting late last year, and then later after suing the government, a contract worth up to $800,000,000. Matthew r Gagliotti, head of the justice department's criminal division, saying, quote, their scheme violated the public trust by corrupting the federal government's procurement process. Anybody who cares about good and effective government should be concerned about the waste, fraud, and abuse in government agencies, including USAID. Cutting waste, fraud, and abuse has been a big focus on Capitol Hill across government, a major priority for house speaker Mike Johnson. The US agency for international development has been a target for those looking to trim government spending with some suggesting the agency funneled taxpayer dollars into ideological projects. USAID blew it. They show themselves to be completely irresponsible. It needs to be redone, and and the funds need to be directed properly. Back to the scheme, the justice department says this kind of fraud erodes public trust. Bill? Speaker 0: Wild story, Mike. Half a billion dollars. Remarkable. Mike Emanuel, live in DC for us. Thank you, Mike. Speaker 1: I'm Steve Ducey. I'm Brian Kilmeade. And I'm Ainsley Earhart. And click here to subscribe to the Fox News YouTube page to catch our hottest interviews and most compelling analysis.

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

3/ The scheme: 🔹 Cash bribes 🔹 Country club weddings 🔹 Fake jobs for family 🔹 Mortgage down payments 🔹 NBA luxury suite tickets 🔹 Laptops, burner phones, shell companies All to funnel contracts to preferred DEMOCRAT vendors—on YOUR dime.

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

4/ One of those contractors? Vistant, awarded an $800M USAID deal in 2023 to address “root causes of migration” in Central America. Translation: they got paid to fail at the border crisis Democrats created.

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

5/ Vistant’s CEO and a 2d contractor funneled bribes through a third party to hide the scheme. The DOJ says USAID’s own official received more than $1 MILLION in bribes. Your government has operated this way for YEARS without oversight. No WONDER Democrats freaked about DOGE!

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

6/ Now SBA Administrator Kelly Loeffler is ordering a full-scale audit of every SBA contract officer since 2010. She’s calling this what it is: 👉 “Systemic failure” 👉 “Collapse in safeguards” 👉 “Breakdown in federal integrity” But turn on the light & the rats & roaches run

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

7/ Loeffler’s audit begins immediately with all high-dollar and limited-competition contracts in SBA’s 8(a) program. Violators will be referred to the DOJ. Funds will be recovered. No more free passes for corrupt bureaucrats and fake small businesses.

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

8/ The same people who claimed cutting USAID would “hurt the poor” were protecting bribery rackets and slush funds. President Trump and his team are dismantling it, root and branch. And not a moment too soon. 🔥 https://www.rodmartin.org/p/usaids-shutdown-trump-and-musks-nuclear

USAID’s Shutdown: Trump and Musk’s Nuclear Strike on the Deep State The main foreign aid agency, whose budget is bigger than the CIA and the State Department combined, has served for decades as a global Democrat slush fund. rodmartin.org

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

If you enjoyed this content, please like and share, and also sign up for your FREE or PREMIUM subscription to my newsletter at http://RodMartin.org.

The Rod Martin Report | Rod D. Martin | Substack Tech Entrepreneur. Futurist. Christian. "Philosopher Capitalist". Click to read The Rod Martin Report, by Rod D. Martin, a Substack publication with thousands of subscribers. rodmartin.org
WallStreetApes
Posted - August 15, 2025 at 6:07 AM
Saved - August 15, 2025 at 11:03 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared concerns about Senator Sheldon Whitehouse voting to allocate $14.2 million to the Ocean Conservatory, a nonprofit run by his wife, who received $2.7 million from that funding. I highlighted how politicians exploit nonprofits and government contracts to enrich themselves. Additionally, I pointed out the case of Family Endeavors, an empty facility in Texas receiving $18 million monthly, with ties to a Biden Transition Team member. Despite these revelations, no one seems to face consequences for such actions.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Democrat Senator Sheldon Whitehouse voted to send $14.2 million dollars to his wife’s NGO, she pocketed $2.7 million “They steal our tax dollars to line their pockets via nonprofits, non government organizations, also known as NGOs and government contracts” “Senator Sheldon Whitehouse — backed the legislation that approved $14.2 million to go to Ocean Conservatory. It was a non profit for cleaning up the beaches. Guess who the main runner in that company was? Oh, his wife. She got $2.7 million of that dollar, that amount. So he approved that. This company got the contract, and his wife is the main chick. That's how they steal your money.” Family Endeavors was is an empty facility in Texas, it was being paid $18 million per month by Democrats. Biden’s Transition Team Member served on the board All this information gets exposed, and not a single person ever gets arrested

Video Transcript AI Summary
THE DOGE report alleges that funds are siphoned from the public through NGOs and government contracts. The speaker cites two examples: "Senator Sheldon White house is under the hot seat right now because he backed the legislation that approved $14,200,000 to go to ocean conservatory." A second case concerns "Family Endeavors" in Pecos, Texas, meant for overflow of immigrant children; it has been empty since 02/2021, while "we have been paying 18,000,000 million dollars a month" to keep it open. A board member was "one of Biden's transition team members." The presenter then says, "This is my opinion only. From this point on, everything I've told you so far is facts. You can go look it up online. This is my opinion only. I call that a payoff." They conclude, "That is how they steal from you. That is today's DOGE report."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The DOGE report, how they steal our tax dollars to line their pockets via nonprofits, nongovernment organizations, also known as NGOs, and government contracts. I've got two examples for you. Now mind you, this is only two of the probably hundreds, but here we go. We'll get into it. Senator Sheldon White house is under the hot seat right now because he backed the legislation that approved $14,200,000 to go to ocean conservatory. It was a nonprofit for cleaning up the beaches. Guess who the main runner in that company was? Oh, his wife. Mhmm. She got 2,700,000.0 of that dollar that amount. So he approved that this company got the contract, and his wife is the main chick. That's how they steal your money. K? Next one. There is an empty facility in Pecos, Texas. It is called Family Endeavors. It was meant for overflow of immigrant children who came across the borders without parental guidance, without a parent attached or a responsible adult. And so it was to be for overflow. So it was operationally ready, but it was empty since 02/2021. And since 02/2021, we have been paying 18,000,000 million dollars a month. $18,000,000 a month to an empty facility so that they could be ready just in case. Now fun little fact. Who do you think was on that board? Oh, that's right. One one of Biden's transition team members. This is now this part is my opinion only. From this point on, everything I've told you so far is facts. You can go look it up online. This is my opinion only. I call that a payoff. I call that, hey. You probably saw a lot inside the office, and I need you to keep our secrets our secrets, and I'm gonna make sure you're well taken care of at the tune of $18,000,000 a month, my friend. And that's what it he did. He went and opened this Family Endeavors, and it remained empty since 02/2021. And they took $18,000,000 of our money every month to keep it open. That is how they steal from you. That is today's DOGE report. Stick around for more.
WallStreetApes
Posted - December 27, 2025 at 10:31 PM
Saved - December 29, 2025 at 6:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read claims that Stacey Abrams founded an NGO that supposedly received $2 billion from the Biden administration 30 days after its founding, and that she has not returned any money. The piece says the NGO has not been required to repay any portion of the funds. It also quotes Elon Musk alleging there are many similar fraud cases and criticizes loud complainers as fake righteousness.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Stacey Abrams founded an NGO and 30 days later was sent $2 billion dollars by the Biden Admin As of today, December 27, 2025 she has not had to give a single penny back Again, the Stacey Abrams NGO has not been required to return any portion of the $2 billion fund Elon Musk confirms there are MANY cases similar to the Stacey Abrams NGO fraud “The fraudsters — Like the $2 billion to Stacey Abrams NGO, that basically doesn't exist and suddenly gets $2 billion awarded from the federal government. Why? There are MANY such cases like that” “The, you know, who complains the loudest and the, with the, the most amount of fake righteous indignation. The frauds

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that the loudest complainers and the most fake righteous indignation come from fraudsters. They claim there are NGOs, including a Stacey Abrams NGO, that “basically didn't exist” yet were suddenly awarded $2,000,000,000 from the federal government. Stacey Abrams reportedly asks, “why?” The speaker notes there are many such cases.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The you know who complains the loudest and the with the the most amount of fake righteous indignation? The fraudsters. That's it's a tell. These the NGOs that are crazy. Like, the the $2,000,000,000 to Stacey Abrams NGO that basically didn't exist and suddenly gets $2,000,000,000 awarded from the federal government. She says, why? And there are many such cases like that.
View Full Interactive Feed