reSee.it - Related Post Feed

elonmusk
Posted - May 20, 2022 at 3:28 AM
Saved - October 17, 2023 at 7:34 AM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

The attacks against me should be viewed through a political lens – this is their standard (despicable) playbook – but nothing will deter me from fighting for a good future and your right to free speech

JackPosobiec
Posted - May 25, 2023 at 3:24 AM
Saved - May 25, 2023 at 4:51 PM

@JackPosobiec - Jack Poso 🇺🇸

"If I renounced my beliefs. If I stayed silent. If I stayed home, the persecution would stop But I can't do that. Bc I love our country far too much And remember, they are coming after me bc they are really after you. And I am standing in their way" https://t.co/zbbkYsMyNZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The corrupt establishment is targeting me to maintain their power and control over the American people. They want me to renounce my beliefs, stay silent, and accept a corrupt Election. But I refuse to do that because I love our country too much. They're coming after me because I'm standing up for you, and they'll come after you too.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Never forget everything this corrupt establishment is doing to me is all about preserving their power and control over the American people. If I renounced my beliefs, which I won't do, if I agreed to stay silent, if I stayed at home, if I said that a corrupt Election was wonderful. The persecution would stop immediately. They'd say, Good luck. Let's go on to the next victim. But I can't do that because I love our country far, far too much. And remember, they're coming after me because I'm standing up for you, and they're coming after you. Believe me, they're coming up for you.
MAGA__Patriot
Posted - June 10, 2023 at 1:44 PM
Saved - June 10, 2023 at 10:28 PM

@MAGA__Patriot - Trump Girl 🇺🇲🦅🇺🇲

America, this is a weaponized DOJ and they are trying to stop him at all cost! I will continue to support the man evildoers continually attack!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Questions have arisen regarding President Biden's handling of classified documents found in his garage, leading to an investigation by the Justice Department. Meanwhile, there have been ongoing efforts to target Trump, with the intention of preventing him from running for president again. However, it is important to note that Biden himself has not been indicted. The focus of the investigation seems to be on Trump, as Biden's DOJ has taken action against him. Stand with President Trump in opposition to Biden's actions.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They've been after Trump from the beginning, but Questions swirl around president Biden's handling of classified document. Found in president Biden's garage. Multiple classified documents. You and the former president are pulled now under investigation by the justice department. Him. But they didn't indite Biden. Instead, Biden's DOJ went after Trump. Anything to block him from becoming president again. Stand with president Trump against Biden's
TPV_John
Posted - October 5, 2023 at 2:20 AM
Saved - October 5, 2023 at 12:34 PM

@TPV_John - The Patriot Voice

It’s not just “the government”

@TPV_John - The Patriot Voice

THE FBI IS OPENLY TARGETING @realDonaldTrump SUPPORTERS AS “MAGA EXTREMISTS”. 🚨🚨🚨 “The federal government believes that the threat of violence and major civil disturbances around the 2024 U.S. presidential election is so great that it has quietly created a new category of… https://t.co/2wch5G3JtK

GuntherEagleman
Posted - November 16, 2023 at 11:56 PM
Saved - November 17, 2023 at 1:17 PM

@GuntherEagleman - Gunther Eagleman™

No Americans are safe under this FBI… Watch your backs. https://t.co/E0aMSSboF4

Video Transcript AI Summary
On October 18th, a pro-Hamas group led by Rashida Tlaib illegally occupied the Canon House building. Photos captured organizers texting each other in a chat called "global intifada." During a Homeland Committee hearing, the FBI director, Christopher Lee, admitted he was unaware of the group and its meaning. Over 300 members were arrested, including one with terrorist ties who almost assaulted a congresswoman. The chat also revealed the involvement of Katrina Blakely, a lead attorney at the Southern Poverty Law Center, which the FBI has used as a resource. The congresswoman criticized the FBI for not caring about terrorism and accused them of being a political campaign arm. She also mentioned Tlaib's connection to a Facebook group with known terrorists.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So October 18th, we had the ceasefire now, the pro Palestinian the really pro Hamas, group come in, illegally occupy the Canon House building. And that was led by Rashida Tlaib. She she's very organized in those groups, and we captured photos of the, organizers texting, shared photos of the, organizers texting each other on their cell phones. And the image we captured shows their cell phone, and they were in a chat message amongst each other. And the the name of the chat is global in Tifana. And this is what I brought at the Christopher Lee, our FBI director, yesterday at the Homeland Committee hearing. And I said, are you aware that this group call some self global intifada. And I asked him, I said, do you know what intifada means? And he goes, no. I don't. I said, do you know the definition? He goes, no. I don't. I said it means Arab uprising. It means jihad, and it's a global intifada, global jihad group broke into our office buildings in the capital complex, and Capitol police arrested over 300 of them. One of them that has known terrorist ties nearly assaulted me, and Capitol Police had to move him out of the way. But here's what else is interesting because you already brought it up. In the in the chat message the list of names. We're very visible. One of them is Katrina Blakely, who is the lead attorney at the Southern Poverty Law Center. And the FBI has been using the resources and quoting, the Southern Poverty Law Center in their attacks on Catholics all over the country. And this is who is involved in the global intifada group. And I brought this up to him, and he had no knowledge, no awareness of it, and was not even interested. Didn't ask me, Congresswoman, could you please provide me with this evidence? Not at all. He did not care because the FBI and the Department of Justice is the political campaign arm, which is the weaponized arm of the Joe Biden campaign for presidency. And this is the most outrageous, Dangerous thing happening in our country, Dawn. No American is safe when we have an FBI director that doesn't care about terrorism, breaking into our own government or terrorists all over our country, but yet will abuse the system to hunt down people like Gregory Getman, with helicopters and tanks in the streets. Doesn't doesn't want to go after, all the black high school students that beat and kick to death. A 17 year old white student doesn't consider that a federal hate crime, but yet will target any minority that is killed by a white person and considers that a federal hate crime. It it just it I could not believe it. I was so angry questioning him yesterday, and and I'm going to continue that path because our FBI should be investigating terrorists, especially when it's linked to Rashida Tlaib, a member of congress who was outed this week for being in a Facebook group for 6 years with known tariffs in Hamas. And it's very serious.
RealStevefriend
Posted - December 5, 2023 at 9:45 PM
Saved - December 6, 2023 at 12:03 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
During the Senate Judiciary hearing, FBI Director Chris Wray discussed the term "AGAAVE," which stands for Anti-Government Anti-Authority Violent Extremist. The FBI and DHS released a Strategic Intelligence Assessment on Domestic Terrorism in May 2021, defining AGAAVE as the unlawful use of force or violence driven by anti-government or anti-authority sentiments. The FBI identifies sentiments such as perceived government overreach, negligence, and illegitimacy. If you express dissatisfaction with mandates, immigration, or election outcomes, you may fit the FBI's profile for domestic terrorism. Some argue that the FBI is excessively weaponized and should be defunded and dismantled.

@RealStevefriend - Steve Friend

During today's Senate Judiciary hearing, @FBI Director Chris Wray spoke about the "AGAAVE." That's an Anti-Government Anti-Authority Violent Extremist. But what is that, really? 🧵

@RealStevefriend - Steve Friend

The FBI and DHS authored this Strategic Intelligence Assessment and Data on Domestic Terrorism in May 2021. https://t.co/PoD3yNIENb

@RealStevefriend - Steve Friend

The document defines AGAAVE as "unlawful use of threat of force or violence in furtherance of ideological agendas, derived from anti-government or anti-authority sentiment." https://t.co/oycMN31wak

@RealStevefriend - Steve Friend

Among the sentiments, the @FBI lists: Perceived government overreach Perceived government negligence Perceived government illegitimacy

@RealStevefriend - Steve Friend

Were you upset by executive orders mandating masks on airplanes or a COVID vaccination in the workplace? Unhappy with the illegal alien invasion at the southern border? Are you questioning election outcomes following untested mail-in voting procedures?

@RealStevefriend - Steve Friend

Congratulations! You fit the @FBI profile for a domestic terrorism and may find yourself in their crosshairs soon. The FBI is irredeemably weaponized. @HouseGOP must defund and dismantle this agency.

WallStreetApes
Posted - December 9, 2023 at 5:47 PM
Saved - December 9, 2023 at 6:02 PM

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Former FBI SWAT Agent Tells Vivek Ramaswamy “Be Careful, Be Careful” Vivek Responds “I'm reading between the lines of what you're saying” Former FBI “They're coming after you. No doubt about it” Is this an admission the FBI acts against Americans challenging the establishment? https://t.co/dS5aLlZriF

Video Transcript AI Summary
Mike Wyatt, a retired FBI agent, expresses his concerns to Speaker 0 about the need for change within the organization. He emphasizes the importance of bravery and integrity and shares his worry about the current state of affairs. Speaker 0 acknowledges Mike's concerns and appreciates his service. Mike advises Speaker 0 to seek competent help and gather intelligence before making decisions. He also mentions the aggressive nature of certain organizations and warns Speaker 0 to be prepared. Speaker 0 assures Mike that they are ready for any challenges and expresses gratitude for his advice. The conversation ends with Speaker 0 acknowledging the possibility of facing opposition if things don't work out.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's your name, sir? Mike Wyatt. Mike, good to meet you. Speaker 1: You and my girl. When I went in, it was a fatality, bravery, integrity, and it broke my heart. This can't be. This can't go on. And We will we will Speaker 0: and I like the way you're pushing because it's those are my instincts. Right? But I can tell you what we can immediately get done. Thank you for your service. Be tired but Speaker 1: choose us be careful. Speaker 0: I will. We will. I mean, we're guided by our purpose. I know I know that it can get ugly. You mean you mean, like, be careful, be very careful. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 0: What did you do in the bureau? Speaker 1: I worked, was a SWAT guy but I work counterintelligence and, counterterrorism and I was one of those guys that was convinced, they would never do it. Speaker 0: You you how many years worked in how many years were you in the FBI? 22. I Speaker 1: was a cop before that. Speaker 0: Okay. And you you're worried? Speaker 1: Yes. Okay. Do you We He's retired. Speaker 0: What would you do in my shoes? Speaker 1: I get some very very competent help. Okay. And some very competent people do some intelligence work for you before you went places. Okay. Just Walk around, talk to people, maybe with a feeling. Speaker 0: Okay. Because, you know, I played Speaker 1: for a living. I want people to tell me that they didn't wanna tell me. And the other thing is I'm not an entrepreneur. I'm trying to follow your footsteps, but I don't think my room farm is gonna catch up with you. Okay. I Speaker 0: appreciate it. We'll take that seriously, man. I, I I'm reading between the lines of what you're saying, and we got you. Okay. Thank you. We'll take care of ourselves and Speaker 1: seen how aggressive That's these alphabet organizations. Yes. To become. They're coming after you. Speaker 0: Yeah. No doubt about it. But we're ready. Speaker 1: If okay. We'll be ready. If you think you're going back in To private life, if this doesn't work out, they're coming. Speaker 0: Okay. I appreciate that. Thank you.
RepClayHiggins
Posted - February 16, 2024 at 6:15 PM
Saved - February 17, 2024 at 1:14 AM

@RepClayHiggins - Rep. Clay Higgins

The Federal surveillance machine is trampling the Bill of Rights. Wake up America. We are threatened from within. Recognize the enemy and fight for your freedom. Fight legally, peacefully, and within the parameters of our Constitution… but by God, fight. https://t.co/XNeo0Akmhv

amuse
Posted - March 29, 2024 at 1:22 PM
Saved - March 30, 2024 at 2:09 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
If you're criticizing the Biden regime on X, the FBI and/or DHS may be monitoring your account. Get a Ring doorbell to ask for ID through the camera, but don't open the door or answer questions. Some people have experienced FBI visits over social media posts, leading to calls to defund the FBI. It's advised not to engage with law enforcement without counsel. Another individual in Texas faced FBI questioning for opposing Joe Biden on social media.

@amuse - @amuse

FBI: If you’re actively posting criticism of the Biden regime on X your account is being actively monitored by the FBI and/or DHS. Make sure you get a Ring doorbell so when they come to your door you can ask them to hold their ID up to the camera. Then politely tell them you are not available and you don’t answer questions. Do not open the door. Watch this video: https://youtu.be/d-7o9xYp7eE?si=rH6WV9RknrHCScVz…

Video Not Available youtube.com

@amuse - @amuse

Never open the door for the FBI:

@KAM4Texas - 𝐊𝐚𝐦 𝐒𝐭.𝐌𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐧

🚩The FBI came to my house over a TWEET! Not cool. My pinned tweet that’s still up. ⁦@elonmusk⁩ https://t.co/5GauyJTXTt

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm John Gray from the FBI. Miss Anderson isn't here. I wanted to discuss the Baton Rouge case with her. Can I schedule a meeting with her?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm especially I'm John Gray with the FBI. Who are you? Is miss Anderson here? No. She's not. Like, I was hoping to see if I could have a couple minutes of her time. Sorry. Okay. Is there a chance I can make an arrangement to come back and talk to her, or what's it about? It's about the, Baton Rouge, subject.

@amuse - @amuse

Never open the door for the FBI:

@TheTankGuns - Rick Ferran

Welcome to the new communist of states of America where the gestapo shows up at your door to question you over a post you made on social media. The FBI/CIA are too busy arresting American citizens for practicing their freedom of speech. https://t.co/3aHeK6bpbv

Video Transcript AI Summary
The FBI agents visit a person to discuss social media posts flagged by Facebook. The person refuses to engage without their lawyer present, citing freedom of speech. The agents assure they are not there to arrest but to ensure safety. The person questions why their opinions are being scrutinized, pointing out it's a right as an American. The agents leave contact information for further discussion. The person asserts their rights and identity, emphasizing they live in America.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can we just move in front of the house so the dogs don't Speaker 1: go crazy? Speaker 0: I need you to identify yourself, and let me take imagery of your IDs. Speaker 1: I'm not gonna share my credentials on the phone. Speaker 0: So you said you were with the FBI? That's correct. And why won't you show me your credentials? Speaker 1: We did. Speaker 0: I I showed you not I didn't really take a look at them. I said one second. I'll be right back. Are you gonna show me your credentials or no? Speaker 1: Yeah. We did already. So and we identified ourselves. So what we'd like Speaker 0: to do I didn't look at your credentials again. I didn't verify them. I I told you to wait, and I went inside. Speaker 1: Okay. That's correct. What we'd like to do is have a conversation with you about some social media posts that you've made. Would you be willing to talk to us today about Speaker 0: that? No. I would not. I would like you to later talk on with my lawyer. Okay. Do you have identification? Card or something? Speaker 1: Cards? Attorney that we can Speaker 0: reach you. No. No. I'll get back to you. Okay. Alright. Speaker 1: Do you like to have your attorney contact the FBI office of Oklahoma City. Speaker 0: What's the number? What are the names of the agents? Speaker 1: I'll do one for you. Speaker 0: So you're freezing to identify yourself? Speaker 1: No. We got it. I didn't Speaker 0: have any Again, I did not take a look. Speaker 1: K. So the phone number for the FBI in Oklahoma City is 405-290-7770. Speaker 0: Okay. Speaker 1: If you just call me Speaker 0: back and then we'll be able Speaker 1: to get your contact with us on the. Speaker 0: And tell him that Facebook flagged me for posts. Speaker 1: Facebook gave us a couple of screenshots of of your accounts. Speaker 0: Okay. So we no longer live in a free country and we can't say what we want? No. No. Speaker 1: We totally do. That's that's why we're not here to arrest or anything like that. Speaker 0: Well, you can't arrest me for freedom of speech. We live in America. Correct. Exactly. So it's kind of weird that you wanna come talk to me about me exercising my freedom of speech. Speaker 1: We do this every day, all day long, talk to people. Okay. It's just an effort to keep everybody safe, make sure that nobody has the legal will or bad intentions or anything like that. And we've got no reason to believe necessarily that that's you, and that's why we just wanted to have Speaker 0: a conversation. So do you have a conversation with everybody on Speaker 1: the neighborhood? Do you have information with anybody else in the neighborhood? Speaker 0: I mean, all I've done is exercise my right as an American citizen on a public social media platform with my personal opinions. Correct? Okay. Most of the individuals, right, in America, especially older generation, right, have Facebook. Are you questioning all the citizens in America? Okay. So you have concerns about my personal opinions? Speaker 1: If you don't wanna talk to us, then you do Speaker 0: I'm definitely not gonna have a talk with you. Speaker 1: Well, thank you for your time this morning, and feel free to reach out to us. Speaker 0: Okay. They're so called FBI. This is Rola Abdel Jawad in Stillwater, Oklahoma. This is America.

@amuse - @amuse

Never open the door for the FBI:

@Bubblebathgirl - Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

FBI visit video from 6/4/23. They just show up and expect the mom who answers to give contact info for her daughter. Of course the FBI never says what it’s about and doesn’t even let the mom take a photo of their badges. This is intimidation and entrapment. Defund the FBI. https://t.co/wkrICP26NQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Two FBI agents visit a woman's home looking for Elise, who is not there. The woman, Elise's mother, provides contact information for Elise. The agents assure her that Elise is not in trouble and leave their office number. The woman is initially hesitant but eventually agrees to pass on the message to Elise. The agents introduce themselves as Ashley Roberts and Kathleen Brown before leaving.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi. We're looking for Elise. I'm sorry. She's not here. Can I ask what this is in regards to? Yeah. Sure. My name is Ashley Roberts, and this is Kathleen Brown. We're both with the FBI. Okay. We just need to speak with her regarding some information that was sent into us. Okay. Well, she doesn't live here. Oh, okay. So, I mean, she's my daughter, but this isn't her residence currently. Okay. Do you do you mind giving us her residence or her phone number by chance? Yeah. Can, hold on just a second. Sure. She's not in any trouble. We just have information that we need to ask her about. Okay. Here. Do you mind if I take a picture of your badges? Unfortunately, we're not allowed to to have anyone take our pictures. Can I say it again, please? Sure. I don't know how to tell if you guys were fake, sir. Yeah. Well, you can you can always call our office too, and they can verify our employment because it is weird. Not every day you get a knock on the door from the FBI. No. And I'm, like, in a meeting upstairs, so I wasn't trying to not answer well, yeah, I was trying not to answer the door. No way. I've got it, and I'm like, oh my gosh. Whoever's at the door is being, like, uber persistent. Give me a minute. I'm sorry. So no. That's okay. We can leave you our office number if you'd like to call. Yeah. Let me do that. That sounds good. I'm just screwing. I'll write off another one. Sure. Yeah. Sorry to interrupt your meeting. No. You're good. So can you tell me what you said it's in regards to? And we will we would tell you all the information because like I said, she's not in any trouble. But just out of respect for her, we'd like to speak with her first and then if she feels like talking to you, which I'm sure she will because it's nothing, you know, then then Alright. Well, come to Erin. Hang up. I'm sorry. So, yeah, up there in Washington. That's our number you can call. That's our And what's your name? Kathleen Brown. Thanks.

@amuse - @amuse

Facts... https://t.co/sWPT63CScg

@pnjaban - Harmeet K. Dhillon

This is your regular reminder that unless you actually initiated the encounter, do not engage with law enforcement (especially federal) without the advice of counsel. 🤐

@amuse - @amuse

Never open your door for the FBI: https://t.co/Cih6cW7UAF

@robbystarbuck - Robby Starbuck

Alright we need answers and action from elected officials and @FBI. I’ve now been sent a video released by @_misfitpatriot_ which shows that the FBI came to his door too in Texas to talk about his social media posts. What did he do to deserve this? Oppose Joe Biden. Insane! https://t.co/fWAyPJ0HSm

Video Transcript AI Summary
After a choppy video call, an FBI agent visited my house regarding social media. They found nothing illegal but said it was a procedure. I referred them to my attorney, who tried contacting them with no response. Journalists also reached out with no reply. The FBI seems to be checking boxes at non-criminal homes. Share your thoughts on this.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So that's the full recording that I have. Now, right after that video cut off, I gave him my number to call me because it was very choppy. As you can see, I was repeating stuff. So I talked to mister Hyland on the phone, and by the way, as far as I know, this is an actual FBI agent who works with the actual FBI, and this is a LinkedIn page showing that FBI agent who works in my city. So conspiracy theorists, most likely that's the FBI. Okay? People don't make badges and show up to random people's houses and then record themselves talking to them, impersonating agents. Just side note. Now I would never drop a recorded phone call with the FBI even if I had one, so you're going to have to take my word for this next part. I talked to this agent on the phone. The agent said that they were at my house, and the only thing that they could tell me is it was in regards to my social media. I asked them if it was about a specific post on my social media, and the reply from the agent was, no. We looked at your social media and found nothing illegal. We are just here to check off a box, its procedure, to which I replied, you need to talk to my attorney. I have told you guys, be prepared for anything, and that includes the FBI coming to your house. So my attorney reached out to them 5 seconds after I got off the phone with them, which was 5 minutes after I talked to them. They did not answer. They have not returned my attorney's call to this date. We have no further information. I have also reached out to more than one journalist, and they have reached out as far as I know and have not heard back either. So the FBI is showing up to people's houses that aren't committing crimes and trying to check off boxes. Let me know what you think of that.
elonmusk
Posted - August 30, 2024 at 8:59 PM
Saved - August 30, 2024 at 11:39 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

The attacks this year on free speech are unprecedented in the 21st century. It will happen in America too if Kamala/Walz gain power. Just listen to what they’ve said.

@shaunmmaguire - Shaun Maguire

The west is 3 months away from being lost Canada, France and Brazil are already gone

DC_Draino
Posted - September 4, 2024 at 9:31 PM
Saved - September 5, 2024 at 7:14 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Today's DOJ indictment highlights the targeting of prominent MAGA YouTubers, signaling a broader attack on the Patriot movement by the current administration. The legal system is being manipulated to trap the innocent, reminiscent of the overturned J6 charges. Recent violence against figures like Pastor Greg Locke and threats against Trump underscore the escalating danger. As the regime faces rejection from the public, it's crucial for us to unite, set aside differences, and fight for Trump's election to protect ourselves from potential Deep State repercussions.

@DC_Draino - DC_Draino

Today’s DOJ indictment mentioning prominent MAGA Youtubers is just a preview of what the weaponized Kamala regime will do to every prominent voice in the Patriot movement They will bend the laws to ensnare the innocent just like they did with the J6 “documents” charge that got overturned by SCOTUS Pastor Greg Locke’s was shot up last night Trump’s head was almost blown off just weeks ago after they indicted him 4x The DOJ mentioned multiple Pro-Trump Youtubers in a criminal indictment today Some non-violent Pro-Lifers may die in prison The regime knows it’s being rejected by the American people and is desperately lashing out No more distractions, no more purity tests for Trump, no more BS - we ALL have to fight like hell to get him elected or most of us are going to end up targeted by the Deep State Let’s put small differences aside and band together If we don’t, this country is over

jeremykauffman
Posted - September 16, 2024 at 8:47 PM
Saved - September 17, 2024 at 1:45 PM

@jeremykauffman - Jeremy Kauffman 🦔

The FBI visited my house today for free speech acts they knew were not crimes. You can see the shame on their faces. This is the Democratic regime manifest. https://t.co/RldC0JWMsx

Video Transcript AI Summary
An individual confronts two people identifying themselves as FBI agents, one as Adrian O'Donnell, in front of their house. The individual demands to see their full names and identification, but the agents are hesitant to provide it on camera. The individual states they will post the recording online. The agents say they want to talk about a post that was made. The individual accuses the agents of wasting taxpayer money by investigating something that is not against the law and questions if they believe in the Constitution. The individual calls them "fuckheads" and "cowards" and says they should be embarrassed. The agents then leave.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey. How can I help you? Speaker 1: Hey there. Is this Jeremy? Yeah. How are you? Who are you? I'm agent O'Donnell with the FBI. Speaker 0: Can you give your full name, please? It's Rose. Speaker 1: I'm Adrian O'Donnell with the FBI. Speaker 0: Is that sufficient to identify as the only one O'Donnell affiliated with the FBI? Speaker 1: In New Hampshire, yes. Speaker 0: Could you please state your full name, sir? Speaker 1: Could please stop recording? Speaker 0: No. It's First Amendment right. Okay. What's your name, sir? Speaker 1: Could you stop recording? Speaker 0: Absolutely not. You can show me your name and identification, or or I'm gonna go back inside my house. Speaker 1: Okay. I don't really wanna broadcast my, Oh, Speaker 0: this is going out right after you guys walk away. Speaker 1: So that's why I'm not gonna Speaker 0: So you can show me your name or ID. You can walk away. Speaker 1: Who do you wanna talk to? Speaker 0: I'm not gonna talk to people who claim to be federal agents unless they can show me identification. Speaker 1: Okay. Well, do you see our badges? Speaker 0: I I need to see the is your full name on that badge? Nope. I'd like to see something with your full name or I'm not going to talk to you. Speaker 1: Free not to broadcast it. Speaker 0: This will be going online as soon as you walk away. Speaker 1: Well, all I wanna do is talk to you about a post that was made, and if you happen to be the one that made it. Speaker 0: I wanna talk to you about you guys coming here. Say you make a salary of, I don't know, what, low a 100 k? You guys making 6 figures? Factor in 50% expenses overhead, maybe a 100% expenses. Talking about burning a couple $100 an hour just here, let alone all the time you guys are spending to investigate something that you know is not against the law. Right? Like, you you're familiar with. Speaker 2: So then why would you come? Speaker 1: Because we want we wanted to make sure that there weren't any Speaker 2: No. You're coming because you're you're you're part of a regime that does this kind of thing when you know laws aren't being broken. And that's an embarrassment, man. Didn't you guys read the constitution? Do you not believe in America? Like, how do you do your jobs and go home? Speaker 0: We appreciate it. You're walking away because nothing we did is against the law, and you guys are fuckheads that try to act like bullies. And I hope you go home and are embarrassed. You can't even say your name on camera because you know that what you're doing is embarrassing. You know Americans that believe in the constitution think you're laughable, and you go home and you think about what you did today. Go home and think about it, you cowards. Drive away. Drive away. Speaker 1: Thank you for your time. Speaker 0: You're not welcome. Should be embarrassed. Embarrassing. You Speaker 1: guys are embarrassing.
JamesOKeefeIII
Posted - October 2, 2024 at 11:35 PM
Saved - October 3, 2024 at 6:39 PM

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

Everybody is “afraid of being targeted.” You know what I say? Fuck ‘em all but six. Falsely accuse us. Jail us. Raid us. Turn on us. Fire us. Smear us. Prosecute us. Been there, done that. When my life ends, I want my conscience to be CLEAN. There is NOTHING but truth.

robbystarbuck
Posted - October 25, 2024 at 4:07 PM
Saved - October 25, 2024 at 11:05 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I received a death threat that law enforcement is investigating, stating, "The trans revenge force has your address" and other violent messages. This is a direct result of being framed as a Nazi by figures like Kamala Harris, which incites far-left activists to threaten my life and my family. The individual responsible is in Canada, and I worry that without public pressure, nothing will be done. I urge conservative politicians to take a stand against this violence. Despite the threats, I encourage everyone to speak out and uphold their values without fear.

@robbystarbuck - Robby Starbuck

Here’s another of the death threats against me that law enforcement is investigating. "The trans revenge force has your address" "I look forward to cutting your head off" "Killing Nazis makes the world better, you are 1" I’m releasing this because Kamala Harris and the media are once again framing Trump supporters as Nazis. This is what happens when they frame us as Nazis. Far left activists threaten to kill us and our families. While I’ve been patient, I’m also going public for a second reason: We’ve learned that this individual lives in Canada. Without public pressure, I’m not sure Canada will do anything about it. Even with public pressure I’m not sure they will because the @JustinTrudeau Government seems to empower radicals like this. It’s my hope that some of the conservative Canadian politicians will see this and demand an end to far left violence and threats of violence. @PierrePoilievre It’s time for a line in the sand and for us to make an example of individuals who think that it’s okay to launch these sorts of threats. I want to be very clear about something though… Do NOT let this discourage you from using your voice. I would say what I’ve said and done what I’ve done a million times over because it was the right thing to do. Never let these lunatics scare you into silence. That’s how you end up in a reality where they run your country. Speak up. Be loud. Be proud of your values. Never relent, never backdown, never surrender. We’re made for a time such as this. All of this hatred because I oppose sex changes for children and have killed woke policies at major corporations and inspired them to adopt corporate neutrality where work is no longer a place for political and social division. That’s how deranged these activists are and they’re incited by people at the very top like @KamalaHarris @JustinTrudeau @HillaryClinton @JoeBiden and more.

_whitneywebb
Posted - December 3, 2024 at 12:48 PM
Saved - December 4, 2024 at 11:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've noticed a troubling trend in both the UK and the US regarding freedom of speech. With a new Attorney General suggesting that the FBI should interrogate students protesting the Gaza war and an incoming FBI director urging Americans to prioritize Israel, it's clear that we need to be vigilant. It's essential that we can criticize foreign governments, especially those we financially support, or we risk losing our free speech and national sovereignty.

@_whitneywebb - Whitney Webb

It's been happening across the UK and now it's happening in the US. With an incoming AG who thinks the FBI should interrogate students protesting the war in Gaza and the incoming FBI director that says Americans need to "wake up and prioritize Israel", this should be a cautionary tale that freedom of speech needs to be fought for and defended no matter which party is in power. Americans must be allowed to criticize the actions of a foreign government, particularly one we fund with billions of dollars annually, or we will quickly lose free speech and, quite frankly, even more national sovereignty

@ifamericansknew - If Americans Knew

The FBI has raided the house of an American journalist over her pro-Palestine work amid the Israeli genocidal war on Gaza. https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2024/11/19/737517/FBI-raid-American-journalist-interview-Presstv

FBI raids home of American journalist Alison Weir over her pro-Palestine work The FBI has raided the house of an American journalist over her pro-Palestine work amid the Israeli genocidal war on Gaza. presstv.ir
mistergusano
Posted - January 18, 2025 at 2:11 PM
Saved - January 18, 2025 at 3:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discuss the emergence of a new Bonhoeffer cult, positioning him as a martyr for a Christless Christianity. Historically, Bonhoeffer's intentions appear clear; he sought to surrender Germany to Stalin and the League of Militant Atheists, an organization dedicated to eradicating religion. Some argue he merely opposed nationalism, but I believe he traded it for communism, aiming for a godless society. This mirrors Cuba's experience, where people exchanged their freedoms for a similar ideology, leading to a loss of both liberty and faith.

@mistergusano - Gusano

The idea behind this new Bonhoeffer cult is based on making him the martyr of the new Global Religion, the Christless Christianity. Even if you look at it through a historical context, it all becomes extremely obvious, because Bonhoeffer wanted to surrender his country to Stalin and his 'League of Militant Atheists' This league, also known as 'The League of Militant Godless' or the ‘Society of the Godless’ was an atheistic and antireligious organization, guided by Bolshevik principles, in which his main character, Yemelyan Yaroslavsky, made the mission extremely clear: “It is our duty to destroy every religious world-concept... If the destruction of ten million human beings, as happened in the last war, should be necessary for the triumph of one definite class, then that must be done and it will be done.” And some people may argue that Bonhoeffer only opposed the Nationalist movement in Germany, but that’s like the perfect type of manipulation. First, he didn’t oppose it. Bonhoeffer exchanged it by Communism, and the desire to surrender his nation to Stalin. He wanted a godless society. Second, that’s like the devil saying Christ is bad and then you should follow him instead. This issue was exactly what happened to Cuba. Cubans before 1959 used to say that the system was bad, so they exchanged their freedoms and souls for Communism and a godless society.

@mistergusano - Gusano

Bonhoeffer denied the Christ, doubted the Virgin birth, and the Resurrection. He also believed that mankind didn’t need religion. This is the real manipulative behavior of James Lindsay. Don’t sink into the depths of his own madness while he literally begs for people to make the Woke Right trending. You will regret it your entire life. Look beyond the propaganda, especially the Christians that are following the path of an atheist, all the way to damnation.

julie_kelly2
Posted - February 2, 2025 at 5:58 PM
Saved - February 3, 2025 at 12:46 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a letter from Ed Martin to Chuck Schumer regarding threats Schumer made to Justices Kavanaugh and Gorsuch during a 2020 abortion case. Schumer's remarks were so extreme that they drew criticism from Nancy Pelosi and Chief Justice Roberts. He later tried to downplay his comments, attributing them to his "Brooklyn" roots. It's interesting to note that AG Garland and FBI Director Wray have frequently warned about prosecuting threats against public officials, yet this situation seems to have been overlooked.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

NEW: Here is the letter Ed Martin sent to Chuck Schumer related to threats Schumer made to Kavanaugh and Gorsuch in 2020 as the court was hearing oral arguments in a high profile abortion case. https://t.co/H1trx7RvGQ

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Schumer’s comments were so over the top that even Nancy Pelosi criticized what he said. So did Chief Justice Roberts. Schumer attempted to walk them back claiming his “Brooklyn” roots got the best of him. Keep in mind—AG Garland and FBI director Chris Wray often warned that threats against public officials would be prosecuted to the fullest extent of federal law. Funny how they ignored this.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, you've unleashed chaos, and there will be consequences.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wanna tell you, Gorsuch. I wanna tell you, Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price.
JimFergusonUK
Posted - February 15, 2025 at 11:43 AM
Saved - February 16, 2025 at 12:26 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m alarmed by the ongoing attack on free speech in the UK and Europe, as highlighted by President Trump. He praised JD Vance’s speech in Munich for exposing how European elites are suppressing dissent. It’s concerning that people are being arrested for expressing their views, and I believe this is a serious issue that needs addressing. The fight for real freedom is crucial, and I stand with Trump and Musk in defending our fundamental rights against censorship and control. Free speech should never be compromised.

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

🚨 TRUMP WARNS: FREE SPEECH IN THE UK & EUROPE IS UNDER ATTACK! 🚨 🔴 President Trump has doubled down—calling out the erosion of free speech across Europe and the UK, warning that the people’s fundamental rights are being stripped away. 🔴 He defended JD Vance’s “brilliant” speech in Munich, where Vance exposed how European elites are crushing dissent and punishing those who dare to speak the truth. 🔴 Trump made it clear: "Europe is losing its wonderful right of freedom of speech, I see it." 🔥 CONTROL, CENSORSHIP & SUPPRESSION—THE GLOBALIST PLAYBOOK! 🔥 📢 WHAT THIS MEANS: ⚠️ The people of the UK didn’t vote to be censored—but Starmer and his backers are pushing WEF-style control. ⚠️ Dissenters are being arrested for speech crimes—THIS ISN’T A CONSPIRACY, IT’S HAPPENING. ⚠️ The tide is turning—Trump & Musk stand with the people of Britain & Europe, fighting for REAL freedom. 💥 The battle lines are drawn. The question is—who stands for the people, and who stands for control? 💥 🚨 Free speech is NOT a privilege—it’s a RIGHT. And under Trump, it will be defended! 🚨

Video Transcript AI Summary
I heard JD's speech, and he spoke about freedom of speech. It's true; Europe is losing its freedom of speech. I thought it was a brilliant speech. Europe has to be careful. He also addressed immigration, and Europe definitely has a big immigration problem. Just look at what's happening with crime in various parts of Europe. I thought his speech was very well received. I've heard very good remarks about it.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Heard his speech, and I tell you, you're talking about JD's speech. Right? Yes, sir. I heard his speech, and he talked about, freedom of speech. And and I think it's true in Europe. It's losing they're losing their wonderful right of freedom of speech. I see it. I mean, I I thought he made a very good speech, actually, a very brilliant speech. Yeah. Europe has to be careful. And he talked about immigration, and Europe has a big immigration problem. Just take a look at what's happened with crime. Take a look at what's happening in various parts of Europe. I I thought his speech was very well received, actually. I've heard I've heard very good remarks.
GOBactual
Posted - May 18, 2025 at 7:54 PM
Saved - May 19, 2025 at 4:14 PM

@GOBactual - Garret O'Boyle ن

Unlike any other @POTUS before, @realDonaldTrump faced @fbi retaliation and corruption first hand. He understood my testimony that, "the fbi will crush you" if you dare stand up for the truth. I'm looking forward to the President's administration rectifying this immense problem. https://t.co/5d5vBFmcr5

@GOBactual - Garret O'Boyle ن

It has been two years since I testified with @tristanleavitt, @praywithmarcus, and @RealStevefriend. I had already been suspended for 8 months. It's now nearly 32. When will the retaliation against whistleblowers stop? Not sure how much more we can take. https://t.co/TFagcAg3qL

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker testifies about the weaponization of the FBI and DOJ against its own employees and the American people. He served in the Army in Iraq and Afghanistan, then as a police officer, and later as an FBI special agent. Despite receiving high performance reviews and being selected for specialized units, he has been smeared as a subpar employee after witnessing weaponization within the FBI. He states that too many in the FBI prioritize avoiding difficulty over upholding the Constitution, leading to an Orwellian atmosphere that silences dissent. He is speaking out despite the potential personal cost, including the loss of his job and family's home. He claims the FBI allowed him to accept orders to a new position, sell his family's home, and report to the new unit before suspending him on his first day, rendering his family homeless. He concludes that bad actors have begun running parts of the government, but he will never stop trying to serve the nation and protect the innocent.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Chairman Jordan, members of the committee, thank you for addressing FBI malfeasance and allowing me to speak today. Aside from that point of gratitude, I'm sad, I'm disappointed, and I'm angry that I have to be here to testify about the weaponization of the FBI and DOJ. Weaponization against not only its own employees, but against those institutions and individuals that are supposed to protect the American people. I'm here today because even though I am wrongfully suspended from the FBI, I remain duty bound to the American people to play my small role in rectifying these issues. After all, I never swore an oath to the FBI. I swore an oath to the constitution. I served my nation and community my entire adult life, first in the United States Army, then as a police officer, and late lastly, as an FBI special agent. Shortly after high school, I joined the United States Army where I served in the infantry, and I was quickly promoted through the ranks. I deployed to both Iraq and Afghanistan in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. I served in the historic hundred and first Airborne Division. I received the combat infantryman's badge, which is awarded to those infantrymen who engage in ground combat with our nation's enemies. The army's official motto is this will defend. Along with numerous others, I volunteered to serve this nation, risking my life in combat to protect America and her values. I know some of the best men and women this country has to offer. They come from all backgrounds, races, and creeds. They helped mold me into the person I am today. Each was willing to sacrifice, and many did, to protect this great nation. It is our duty to honor their sacrifices by standing up for what is right regardless of the difficulty. After serving in the army, I became a police officer. Police officers like me are imperfect beings, but we strive to uphold the law and the constitution. People who go to work every day trying to make their communities better, yet who nonetheless are faced with budget cuts and calls for defunding as we continue spiraling away from law and order as a nation. While serving as a police officer, I finished my bachelor's degree graduating with honors in criminology and law studies. Shortly thereafter, I began the long road to becoming an FBI special agent, a position I once understood to be the pinnacle of law enforcement in a way to continue to serve this nation and protect and defend the constitution. During my four years as a special agent, I received the highest annual review an employee can receive. I volunteered for, tried out for, and was selected for an FBI SWAT team. I also volunteered for, tried out for, and was selected for a new unit the FBI created. I also received an award for my work on an anti abortion extremism case. I've been smeared as a malcontent and subpar FBI employee. This smear stands in stark contrast to my life in public service. This smear campaign, disgusting as it is, is unsurprising. Despite our oath to uphold the constitution, too many in the FBI aren't willing to sacrifice for the hard right over the easy wrong. They see what becomes of whistleblowers, how the FBI destroys their careers, suspends them under false pretenses, takes their security clearances and pay with no true options for real recourse or remedy. This is by design. It creates an Orwellian atmosphere that silences opposition and discussion. We know what is right to do, yet we too often refuse to do what is right because of the difficulty and suffering it incurs. I couldn't knowingly continue on this path silently without speaking out against the weaponization I witnessed, even if it meant losing my job, my career, my livelihood, my family's home, and now my anonymity. It's up to members of this committee, current and former FBI employees, and indeed all Americans to ensure that the weaponization of our own government against the people comes to an end no matter the personal cost. As James Madison prude prudently opined, in framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this. You must first enable a government to control the governed, and the next place, oblige it to control itself. The safeguards currently in place at the FBI are clearly inadequate and must be reworked to protect whistleblowers and others who are inappropriately targeted. The FBI can extract whatever they want from me. I'm willing to bear that burden. I've sworn to defend this country from enemies, both foreign and domestic, even if that means sacrificing my life. I've lived that oath out since first enlisting in the army, consistently saying, here am I. Send me. My oath, however, did not include sacrificing the hopes, dreams, and livelihood of my family, my strong, beautiful, and courageous wife, and our four sweet and beautiful daughters who have endured this process along with me. In weaponized fashion, the FBI allowed me to accept orders to a new position halfway across the country. They allowed us to sell my family's home. They ordered me to report to the new unit when our youngest daughter was two weeks old. Then on my first day on the new assignment, they suspended me, rendering my family homeless. They refused to release our goods, including our clothes, for weeks. All I wanted to do was serve my country by stopping bad guys and protecting the innocent. To my chagrin, bad guys have begun running parts of the government, making it difficult to continue to serve this nation and protect the innocent. But I, for one, will never stop trying, and I'll never forget my oath. Thank you.
DickAlupinya247
Posted - July 16, 2025 at 2:34 PM
Saved - July 16, 2025 at 3:05 PM

@DickAlupinya247 - Richard Allupinya

Cope. You cannot stop Americans from telling the truth in our own fucking country.🖕 https://t.co/vAp9IdDw11

newstart_2024
Posted - August 9, 2025 at 11:33 AM
Saved - August 9, 2025 at 11:58 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The UK has launched a new police unit, the "National Internet Intelligence Investigations," to monitor and censor online speech deemed "anti-migrant," claiming it's to prevent unrest. This follows public outrage over a crime involving an asylum seeker, leading the government to target critics instead of addressing the issue. Prime Minister Keir Starmer's government is accused of hypocrisy regarding free speech, with harsh penalties for dissent. This trend is mirrored across Europe, where laws are increasingly used to suppress opposition. The warning is clear: we must resist this encroachment on free speech.

@newstart_2024 - Camus

UK creates 1984-like police unit to monitor social media posts The UK has officially launched its Ministry of Truth—disguised as the "National Internet Intelligence Investigations" unit—a secret police force dedicated to monitoring and censoring "anti-migrant" speech online. Their excuse? "Preventing unrest." But what really sparked this crackdown? Outrage over an asylum seeker charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. When citizens protested, the state didn’t address the crime—it targeted the critics. Starmer’s Free Speech Hypocrisy Prime Minister Keir Starmer claims Britain values free speech—while his government: ✅ Jails a woman for 31 months (longer than a child rapist’s sentence) over a single deleted tweet. ✅ Arrests 30 people a day for "wrongthink" under hate speech laws. ✅ Forces X (Twitter) to block content under the guise of "age verification"—a backdoor for mass censorship. As journalist Michael Shellenberger warns: "This is a sweeping crackdown on free speech in Britain unlike anything we’ve seen in centuries. They’re not just policing words—they’re enforcing ideological conformity." Europe’s Descent Into Digital Tyranny The UK isn’t alone. The EU’s Digital Services Act is weaponized to crush dissent. Ireland wants to scan private messages. Canada, Brazil, and Germany are following the same playbook: Criminalize opposition to mass migration, silence populists, and rig the system. Shellenberger’s chilling insight: "This is a global strategy to encircle the U.S. and pressure Big Tech into censoring speech worldwide. If they win in Europe, Americans will be next." 1984 Was a Warning, Not a Manual George Orwell predicted this exact dystopia: A state that polices language, rewrites truth, and punishes thoughtcrime. Starmer’s Britain and the EU are now living it. The only hope? Push back HARD. - Demand tech companies resist global censorship. - Support leaders who fight this tyranny (like Trump’s tariffs on Brazil for its crackdown). - Never apologize for speaking truth. Free speech is the foundation of the free world. And right now, it’s under siege.

Video Transcript AI Summary
UK creates an elite unit, the National Internet Intelligence Investigations Team, to monitor anti-migrant social posts, claiming it detects early signs of potential unrest. A protest followed after a 38-year-old asylum-seeking migrant was charged with sexual assault for attempting to kiss a 14-year-old girl. Prime Minister says he still believes in free speech. Michael Schellenberger argues there’s story after story about people being thrown behind bars in The UK even for tweets that they have deleted with longer prison sentences than people who've committed physical violent crimes. He cites a woman imprisoned for 31 months for a four-hour tweet and notes a police task force to monitor social media, can stop content based on age verification and block content. He says they will not allow criticism of mass migration and will call it Islamophobia and a hate crime. Orwell’s 1984 is cited; Europe’s crackdown, including the EU Digital Services Act.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 1984, called and he wants its truth ministry of truth back. The UK has created an elite police unit known as the National Internet Intelligence Investigations Team dedicated to monitoring anti migrant social media posts. Leaders claim its purpose is to detect early signs of potential unrest. Speaker 1: Unrest like this protest and counter protest had erupted after a 38 year old asylum seeking migrant was charged with sexual assault for attempting to kiss a 14 year old girl. Speaker 0: Despite the surveillance, UK's prime minister insists he still believes in free speech. Speaker 2: We've had free speech for a very, very long time here. So we're very proud about that. What's protective? Well, Speaker 1: with us now to react is public news founder Michael Schellenberger. Michael, it is true that The United Kingdom and the West has a fairly robust tradition, long standing when it comes to free speech, but I'm not so sure that's true anymore. I mean, there's story after story about people being thrown behind bars in The UK even for tweets that they have deleted with longer prison sentences than people who've committed actual physical violent crimes. Speaker 2: Yeah. That's right, Guy. Thanks for having me on. Yeah. I mean, it's incredible story. I mean, there's a woman that's in prison for thirty one months, which is four months longer than a child rapist is in prison. And what all she was she did was have a tweet up for four hours that she ended up taking down. This is a sweeping crackdown on free speech in Great Britain that we have not seen anything like in maybe hundreds of years. I mean, it's really astonishing. It's happening on multiple levels. Keep in mind, they were already arresting 30 people a day for wrong speech in Britain before this. Now they have a special police task force to constantly monitor social media, including, x, formerly Twitter, and they can stop content based on age verification. So they can stop content saying, oh, this is harmful to mental health. And then x recently, just a few days ago, did block content on the basis of the British order to be able to identify if people were old enough to see it. So the other thing you mentioned there was the Islamophobia. They're they're not gonna allow people to criticize mass migration. They're gonna call it Islamophobia and a hate crime and prevent it. So this is George Orwell I mean, George Orwell perfectly predicted this in 1984 when he wrote his book in the mid forties. Speaker 0: You know, Michael, I was just in Europe at a conference and talking to a number of the people there. I mean, they are married to this idea that you have to monitor the Internet, that you shouldn't be able to say certain basic things, including posting memes or things that are counter to what they believe politically in terms of the political party that's in charge. It's not just The UK. It's also the EU. They have this new digital services act, which is complicated trade between The United States and the European Union. And even the deal that the president just got, it's an un you know, it's it's an issue that has not been satisfied according to the administration. So I don't see this going in a direction that's gonna get better despite the pressure. I mean, the The UK and the EU are really dedicated to this idea of putting people in prison for saying the wrong thing or thinking the wrong thing. Speaker 2: Yeah. Absolutely. It's it's Europe's crackdown is maybe the worst in the world, but, I mean, it's happening everywhere, and it's actually, unfortunately, accelerated since Trump was elected. So it's the EU. It's Britain. It's Ireland wants to read your social meet your social your private text messages. Canada, Brazil, the strategy here is to make it so that the social media companies, will basically censor this content for everybody. So I think a lot of Americans go, I don't really care what happens in some other country, Britain or Europe. They should care because this is a strategy to basically encircle The United States and then have these social media companies pressure. They just delete censor this content for everybody. It's coming at a time when it's always it's overly political. The the populist parties in Europe, just like Trump and the MAGA Republicans in United States, are focused on mass migration. So they wanna censor that content because it's been so politically powerful for these opposition leaders, including Germany, France, Romania. They're basically trying to prevent the opposition from competing at all both through censorship and just keeping them off the ballot. I will just say one positive thing is that Trump today, yesterday, he called out the prime minister in Britain. Today, he's imposed serious tariffs on Brazil because of their censorship and because of their lawfare in preventing a presidential front runner, the last president Bolsonaro, from competing in next year's elections. Speaker 0: Well, and also, just to add to that, I mean, Americans now have to worry about traveling to Europe and saying the wrong thing or posting the wrong thing or have posted the wrong thing many years ago. Being in these so called western countries, they could face arrests by the Europeans or the Canadians. Speaker 2: Absolutely. Yeah. Absolutely. I mean, and that's how that's how they want that's how 1984 works is they want you to be afraid of what you're going to say. They want you to be afraid of saying something controversial and then not expressing it. That's one of the most damaging things to free speech here. You have America was found on idea we have to be free to speak our minds. Europe has taken us in an absolutely terrifying and totalitarian direction. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Thanks. Thank God for the first amendment here. Speaker 0: Yeah. Absolutely. Michael Schellenberg, Berger. Thank you very much.
laralogan
Posted - August 13, 2025 at 2:16 PM
Saved - August 14, 2025 at 3:40 AM

@laralogan - Lara Logan

Tale a look at how invasive they were when going after American citizens for an “insurrection” that never happened. They will do it again given half a chance. They only stopped because you - the people - stopped them by electing Donald Trump. https://t.co/OoQ6bItcgr

JamesOKeefeIII
Posted - September 3, 2025 at 8:30 PM
Saved - September 4, 2025 at 2:05 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
When Seraphin was with the FBI, I chose not to hire him due to red flags. In retaliation, he leaked private messages between me and my girlfriend, claiming it was justified because she wore a Christian cross. This breach of the Stored Communications Act is central to my lawsuit against Project Veritas. Seraphin is a key witness but won’t disclose his source. However, I have obtained deposition footage of that source admitting everything. I want to send a clear message to any FBI agents abusing their power: I will expose you, and I fear no evil.

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

When Seraphin was with the FBI, he wanted a job at Project Veritas. I saw red flags and did not hire him. Out of revenge, he published intimate messages between myself and my girlfriend obtained from a server. The justification? She “wore a Christian Cross around her neck.”

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

FBI AGENT SERAPHIN DEPO VIDEO PART 1: O'Keefe Deposes Ex-FBI Agent Kyle Seraphin Who Was Sued by Kash Patel's Girlfriend for Calling Her a “Mossad Honeypot" Seraphin Testifies He Published O’Keefe’s Private intimate Messages With Ex Because She “Wore a Christian Cross Around Her Neck"

Video Transcript AI Summary
Alexis Wilkins has sued former FBI agent Kyle Seraphin for defamation. Wilkins is the girlfriend of the FBI director, Cash Patel, and the complaint alleges Seraphin defamed Wilkins by posting that she is a Mossad agent and honeypot. This Kyle Sarifen published intimate text messages between the speaker and his then girlfriend that were obtained from a third-party server while at Project Veritas. What you're about to see is never before seen deposition footage where Kyle Sarifen was under oath in federal court explaining why he chose to attack a woman personally and published her private messages without redacting her name despite tearful requests not to do so. "Kyle takes issue with a man talking dirty or being sexual with a woman." "Is it your belief that having sexual relations outside of marriage is a sin?" "It's not just my belief. That's actually the Christian position." "The ends justify the means" and "operational morality is a concept or an operational principle that says the ends justify the means." "My wife found out about that post after I made it, and she doesn't have a problem with it because she's my wife." "f off and die." "We found out who his source was on the board of directors at Project Veritas." Stay tuned.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You ever talk dirty to your wife? Speaker 1: No. Object form. Speaker 2: Object to But the answer is no. James O'Keefe is of low character. Speaker 0: That justifies you releasing his private messages with his then girlfriend. Speaker 2: She appeared on television shows, again, outwardly portraying a Christian cross on her neck. Speaker 0: Do you have previous sexual partners before your wife? Speaker 1: We're we're gonna object to that question and and don't answer that question. Speaker 0: You ever talked dirty to your previous sexual partners? Speaker 1: Again, objection to the question and don't answer it. Speaker 0: This is your chance to make sure that you're not incongruous in your personal life. Are you gonna hide behind your counsel's objection? Speaker 3: You may have seen the news recently that a woman named Alexis Wilkins has sued a former FBI agent named Kyle Seraphin for defamation. Wilkins is the girlfriend of the director of the FBI, Cash Patel. The complaint by Alexis Wilkins alleges former FBI agent Kyle Sarifen defamed Wilkins by posting that she is a Mossad agent and honeypot. That's the same Kyle Sarifen that is at the center of a dispute of a lawsuit between myself organization I founded. This former FBI agent published intimate text messages between myself and my then girlfriend that the FBI agent somehow obtained off of a third party server when I was at Project Veritas. What you're about to see is never before seen deposition footage just weeks ago where Kyle Sarifen was under oath in federal court explaining why he chose to attack a woman personally and published her personal intimate private text messages without redacting her name despite her tearful requests for him not to do so. Again, none of this had any public interest. What seems to be a running theme here with Kyle Sarifen is his vicious attacks against women. Speaker 2: James O'Keefe is of low character. Speaker 0: That justifies you releasing his private messages with his then girlfriend? Speaker 1: Object to form. Speaker 0: What about where is your morality when you release her private messages? Speaker 2: As I understand it, she appeared on television shows, again, outwardly portraying a Christian cross on her neck and then living a very different sort of strange life, I would say. Speaker 0: Are Christians not allowed to talk dirty in the bedroom? Speaker 2: I'm not gonna have Objection to form. Yeah. No theological debate from me. Speaker 0: Well, you you specifically decided that she wore a cross, and so that was the reason that was okay to release her text messages. Speaker 2: Correct. Speaker 3: Kyle takes issue with a man talking dirty or being sexual with a woman. So the attorney asks if Kyle Seraphin has ever done it himself. Speaker 0: You ever talk dirty to your wife? Speaker 1: To the form. Speaker 0: Object to form. Speaker 2: But the answer is no. Speaker 0: Never have. Speaker 1: Object to the form. Speaker 3: The attorney then asks if Kyle Sarifen had any previous sexual relations before he was married, and Kyle Sarifen refuses to answer that question. Speaker 0: Do you have previous sexual partners before your wife? Speaker 1: We're gonna object to that question and don't answer that question. Speaker 0: You ever talked dirty to your previous sexual partners? Speaker 1: Again, objection to the question and don't answer it. Mhmm. Speaker 0: You ever texted previous sexual partners dirty things, sexual things? Speaker 1: Objection to the question and don't answer it. Speaker 3: Since Seraphin brings up morality, he is asked about his sexual relationship before marriage. Speaker 0: Is it your belief that having sexual relations outside of marriage is a sin? Speaker 2: It's not just my belief. That's actually the Christian position. Speaker 0: Did you ever have sexual relations outside of your marriage? Speaker 1: So I've objected to this once. I'm gonna object to it again and don't answer the question. Speaker 0: This is your chance to make sure that you're not incongruous in your personal life. Speaker 1: I'm gonna object to your speaking statement. Speaker 0: Are you gonna hide behind your counsel's objection? Speaker 1: I'm gonna object to that and instruct him not to answer. Speaker 3: The then girlfriend of this reporter tearfully called Seraphin asking him to take down the personal messages. Speaker 0: She contacted you and made you aware that she objected to you sharing her private messages. Right? Speaker 2: I got a tearful phone call, stated something to the effect of what he said. Speaker 0: Calling you in tears, you didn't think to take down the messages, reverse course? Speaker 2: No. Speaker 0: As a Christian man, you thought it was still appropriate even though she was objecting? Speaker 1: Object to form. Speaker 2: Objection. I'm not really sure what that has to do with anything. My actual words is the way that she looks. She looks like a used up porn star. Speaker 0: What moral authority do you have to attack and call her a used up porn star? Speaker 2: Morality doesn't come into this. It's just somebody posting words, and I did, of which I have a right to do in America. Speaker 0: Morality doesn't come into this? Speaker 2: I don't make any moral claims. Speaker 0: You criticized her for being a Christian outwardly, but having a private sexual life that you disagreed with. Is that not a moral claim? Speaker 2: No. I don't think that's a moral claim. Speaker 3: Then shockingly, Kyle compares his act of publishing private intimate text messages to that of OMG reporting on John Bryan saying Prince Andrew had sex with underage girls. Speaker 0: Can you give me an example of James O'Keefe releasing a story where one of his as you just characterized it, one of his reporters goes on a date and then he releases sort of bedroom talk. Speaker 2: Yeah. A couple of days ago, OMG Media put out a story about a friend or fixer for Prince Andrew and then shared information about Prince Andrew's life habits and hearsay. Speaker 0: So you analogize what you did here to the Epstein scandal. Which of Prince Andrew's alleged victims or sexual partners did James O'Keefe out during that story? Speaker 2: I'm only aware you asked for an example and I gave you one. Speaker 0: No. I'm looking for an example of him outing a victim or a sexual partner of any of the people that you're discussing that he releases stories on. Speaker 2: Got it. I don't have that example for you. Speaker 3: Seraphin reaffirms his ends justify the means mentality and that he wanted me to quote, f off and die. Speaker 2: Operational morality is a concept or an operational principle that says the ends justify the means. It's the short version of it, but it's a philosophical way of approaching bad behavior with outcomes that are preferable. Speaker 0: Like, for example, publishing private sexual conversations because you have a vendetta against James O'Keefe. Objection to form. What's this? James can f o a d. Speaker 2: It's commonly understood to f off and die. Speaker 0: So you didn't get a job and James had messages with his girlfriend that you judged to be hypocritical to his outward persona, therefore he can die? Speaker 1: Object to form. Speaker 0: Does your wife support this behavior? Speaker 1: Object to form. Speaker 2: The short answer is yes. Speaker 0: But your wife, you you said earlier, is not only aware, supportive of the way that you've handled this situation. Right? Speaker 2: The entirety of the situation, yes. My wife found out about that post after I made it, and she doesn't have a problem with it because she's my wife. Speaker 0: What does that mean? That your wife has to support every decision that you make? Speaker 1: Object to the form. Speaker 2: It means that there's not daylight between my wife and I when it comes to things that are important. Speaker 0: Alright. So here we are at 04/26/2024 and people are responding to your release of these messages in the last few days. And you write that they were sent to me. Who sent them to you? Speaker 2: I just told you that I'm not revealing my sources, so that would obviously mean that I'm not revealing sources, publicly or to you. Speaker 3: Now, even though Kyle says he will not disclose his source, we actually found out who his source was on the board of directors at Project Veritas, and that will be coming up soon. Stay tuned.

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

This violation of the Stored Communications Act is central to my lawsuit in the Project Veritas case. @KyleSeraphin is a key witness and refuses to name his source. But I’ve obtained under oath, videotaped deposition footage of his source admitting everything. Stay tuned.

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

@KyleSeraphin Let this be a message to ANY FBI agents who abuse their power. I will expose you, If you are abusing your power and taking advantage of honest Americans I will make expose you. Also, I do not fear you. I fear no evil. I will expose you for precisely who you are.

RickyDoggin
Posted - September 16, 2025 at 4:35 AM
Saved - September 17, 2025 at 2:28 PM

@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes

Never let anyone intimidate you for exercising your First Amendment right to free speech. https://t.co/M207m434Kd

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Please keep doctor Martin Luther King Junior's name out of your mouths." "How about we'll quote whoever we wanna quote? How about that's my first amendment right? We will quote who we please to quote, and we will continue to speak freely because, yeah, I'm a veteran." "That's the country that I serve. That's a constitution I sworn allegiance to, and that oath has no expiration date." "When I started off in radio, we would get complaints, complaints about words or phrases or crossing the line, ideas, we would offend people." "If somebody complained about something you said, they were always from the religious right that wrote a letter to your program director saying, you need to be canceled." "Now, that sounds quaint and comical now."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Please keep doctor Martin Luther King Junior's name out of your mouths. I appreciate my colleague for exemplifying exactly the kind of oppression of freedoms that we're referencing. How about we'll quote whoever we wanna quote? How about that's my first amendment right? We will quote who we please to quote, and we will continue to speak freely because, yeah, I'm a veteran. That's the country that I serve. That's a constitution I sworn allegiance to, and that oath has no expiration date. Speaker 1: When I started off in radio, we would get complaints, complaints about words or phrases or crossing the line, ideas, we would offend people. If somebody complained about something you said, they were always from the religious right that wrote a letter to your program director saying, you need to be canceled. Now, that sounds quaint and comical now. Right? We all know that if your program director got a letter from some group who wanted to pull you off the air, they would be atheist and from the left. So and by the way, nobody complained more about the religious right wing people than the progressive left wing people. Like, oh, those do gooders, leave us alone. Let us express ourselves creatively. If you don't like it, don't listen. You're gonna let a couple of
KamalaHarris
Posted - September 18, 2025 at 8:46 PM
Saved - September 19, 2025 at 2:50 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see an outright abuse of power happening. This administration is attacking critics and using fear to silence dissent. Media corporations are giving in to these threats. We cannot remain silent or complacent against this assault on free speech. We deserve better.

@KamalaHarris - Kamala Harris

What we are witnessing is an outright abuse of power. This administration is attacking critics and using fear as a weapon to silence anyone who would speak out. Media corporations — from television networks to newspapers — are capitulating to these threats. We cannot dare to be silent or complacent in the face of this frontal assault on free speech. We, the People, deserve better.

View Full Interactive Feed