TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @DBestrong
@Oktouko - Ͳօմҟօ
Après le donut matinal, le Mc Do du soir ! Parce que t’as utilisé des pailles plastiques, dévoré des insectes, utilisé ta crypto, et que tu as liké ça : T’as sauvé la planète et l’humanité ! La réussite sociale du monde great reseté 🤩 https://t.co/eVW28kr6tI
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the hype surrounding a donut brand called Crisp Cream, which recently opened its first store in France. Some people woke up early to try their donuts, while others even spent the night at the store. With a strong social media presence and free donut giveaways, Crisp Cream attracted a large number of customers. The brand aims to open several more stores in the Paris region by 2024. Despite the long wait times, customers find the donuts delicious and enjoyable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mais c'est quoi cette hype autour de cette marque de donuts Elle s'appelle Crisp cream, elle vient d'ouvrir son premier magasin en France et pour déguster ses beignets, certains se sont levés très tôt.
Speaker 1: On a donc depuis 6 heures cinquante. Sept heures et demie. On s'est réveillé je pense. 6 heures trente.
Speaker 0: Et d'autres ont même passé la nuit sur place.
Speaker 1: Hier nos clients étaient là dès dix-neuf heures ce matin avant l'ouverture on avait plus de trois-cents personnes.
Speaker 0: Bon il faut dire que l'enseigne américaine suivi sur les réseaux sociaux par dix millions d'abonnés, c'est créé l'événement. Ces deux dernières semaines, cent-mille donuts ont été distribués gratuitement dans les rues fari, des affiches ont été placardées sur les murs de la capitale sans l'accord de la mairie et autres techniques de Crispi crime pour attirer le chaland, des jeux cours. Les cent premiers arrivés ce matin ont ainsi gagné plusieurs mois de donuts gratuit. Objet dérivé standard selfie et jusqu'à quarante-deux mille donuts fabriquées par jour sous les yeux des clients. Plus qu'une simple boutique, la recette du succès de Crispicrim, c'est de proposer une expérience unique.
Née en mille-neuf-cent-trente-sept aux États-Unis, l'enseigne seigne, vend aujourd'hui ses beignets dans trente-huit pays dans le monde. Objectif, ouvrir plusieurs dizaines de points de vente en Île-de-France deux-mille-vingt-quatre. Une belle leçon de marketing, mais en attendant, est-ce que les deux heures d'attente en valait vraiment la chandelle
Speaker 1: Le donut, il fond en bouche et c'est Incroyable comme sensation. Ouais, c'est indescriptible, c'est doux et à la fois genre sucré, c'est croustillant, j'aime bien. C'est délicieux.
@HistoryDefine_ - Lost In History
This is Pre-WWII footage of a smoke curtain, used to hide ships during a naval battle, being deployed. https://t.co/1qU8qvIqp4
@Mec2LaLumiere - ManOfTheMoon ⚛️
Les pluies de nano diamants... C'est normal ces couleurs... Car Jupiter est tout proche de nous et Saturne n'est pas loin non plus... https://t.co/3OUo2PpTE2
reSee.it AI Summary
Many elderly people who have been vaccinated are showing high levels of D-dimers in their blood, indicating an immediate risk of blood clots, especially in veins. Thanks to Dr. Benoît Ochs for the reminder.
@Dr_Steph_GAYET - Dr Stéphane GAYET
Un petit rappel d'un grand processus pathogène : de nombreuses personnes injectées, surtout âgées, présentent dans leur sang une concentration très élevée de D-dimères, ce qui indique un risque immédiatement élevé de thromboses ("caillots"), surtout veineuses. Merci à mon ami le Dr Benoît Ochs. @OWinkerfield @HamelinMd
Video Transcript AI Summary
D-dimers are markers for thrombosis. When analyzing blood samples for suspected deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, the normal range should not exceed 500. However, there has been a significant increase in elevated d-dimers among vaccinated patients. Many patients have levels above 3000, leading to concerns about microthrombosis throughout the body. Despite further examinations, no embolism or thrombosis has been found. Fatigue is a common symptom among these patients. The risk is that these individuals may experience microthromboses, potentially leading to death in the future. This raises questions about the future health and insurability of those with high d-dimer levels. Investigations and studies should be conducted to understand these phenomena, including the occurrence of thrombosis in placentas during pregnancies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Les ddimères c'est des marqueurs de thrombose lorsque vous avez une phlébite lorsque vous avez une suspicion de d'embolie pulmonaire vous allez faire une analyse de sang et vous allez doser les dénimaires pour voir s'ils sont élevés ces dénimaires ne doivent pas dépasser cinq cent normalement d'accord et là une des premières personnes que j'avais analysé je me suis retrouvé avec une analyse de son ils m'ont ils m'ont rendu le résultat de 7500 7500 des mers je n'avais jamais vu plus de 2500 des limères moi jeu téléphone au laboratoire je leur demande mais est ce que vous êtes sûr vérifier que c'est bien parce qu'il vient vrai il me dit oui on a vérifié c'est sûr et les médecins des laboratoires sont au courant qu'actuellement il y a énormément de dédimères qui sont élevés et qu'on le retrouve chez les patients vaccinés. C'est pratiquement impatients sur cinq impatients sur cinq il ya des délits mères qui sont au dessus des normes moi j'en ai bien une trentaine qui ont plus de 3000 trois-mille de délimères. Trois-mille de délimères, c'est alors bien sûr, il faut les envoyer à l'hôpital pour faire des examens pour regarder s'ils n'ont pas une embolie pulmonaire s'ils font pas une thrombose quelque part et en général on trouve rien du tout on trouve rien du tout on ne trouve pas d'embolie pulmonaire on ne trouve pas de phlébite on ne trouve pas d'accident vasculaire cérébral par contre ils sont fatigués sont très fatigués alors ma conclusion c'est, et je n'en n'ai pas la certitude, mais il faut rechercher le risque et le risque c'est que ces personnes fassent des micro thromboses partout dans leur corps et que à force de faire des micro thromboses partout dans leur corps comme ça peut-être toutes ces personnes sont décédées l'année prochaine donc si on voit moi on peut dire que si j'ai perdu par exemple cinquante personnes à mon cabinet ici à luxembourg qui ont des des dix mères qui sont très élevés quelle est l'avenir de ces gens là dans le futur je peux vous dire qu'une personne qui a plus de trois mille de délibère qui essaye d'avoir une assurance vie il n'y a aucune assurance qui lui a donné une assurance vie céder personnes qui sont dans la possibilité de mourir dans les prochains mois ou l'année prochaine 3000 de délimères vous êtes en train de composer toutes vos petites artères ou alors vous avez déjà une thrombose qui est en train de se faire quelque part embolie pulmonaire mais trois mille deux délits mer vous êtes en train de boucher toute votre pièce à terre alors je vais vous prendre un exemple il ya énormément d'accouchement actuellement où il contrôle le placenta le placenta des bébés chez les femmes enceintes les troupes plein de thrombose au niveau de ses placenta des choses qui n'ont jamais vu qu'elle est que se passe-t-il est ce qu'il n'y a pas est ce qu'il ya une enquête qui l'ancat qui devrait être faite est ce qu'il y a une est ce qu'il y a des études qui devraient être faites il y a tout de suite des études qui devaient être lancées pour faire c'est pour regarder ces choses là moi ça fait depuis le mois de mars que j'en parle
@HudALMojel - هدى فهد المعجل🕊
@archeohistories Tibetan clothing has a long and rich history; its styles are highly diverse across different regions and subcultural groups. Tibetan clothing reflects local characters, conveys cultural differences, and is often adorned with symbolism. https://t.co/9jujEv4r0b
Video Transcript AI Summary
Tibetan robes, known as chubas, are a significant part of Tibetan culture. They can indicate a person's region and background. There are five main types of robes: pulu woolen robes, lambskin robes (white and black), sheepskin robes, woolen robes, and light robes. Woolen robes are popular in warmer agricultural areas due to their lightness and warmth. Pulu robes are favored in pastoral and farmland regions. Lambskin robes vary in quality based on the length and curliness of the lamb hair. A medium class lambskin robe requires over 40 pieces of lambskin. Overall, Tibetan robes are designed to be beautiful, practical, and comfortable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Tibetan robe is called chuba. Tibetans can tell which region a person is from and their background by the types of robes they wear. Tibetan robes are made with wide fronts and wide waists that are buttoned on the right side. They often have soft fur, pulu, or colorful cloth on the collar, front, cuff, and lower hem of the gown. Generally, there are 5 types of robes.
Those made of pulu woolen fabrics, lambskin robes, Sheepskin robes, woolen robes, and light robes. Woolen robes are made with inner layers of sheep fur, so they are light and warm, making them popular in the warmer agricultural areas. Pulu, the traditional Tibetan wool fabric, is made by fluffing and combing the wool, twisting it into a thread by fingers, then weaving it with a wooden shuttle loom. Punu robes are favorite in pastoral areas as well as farmland. Lambskin robes are divided into white and black lambskin.
Lambskin is ranked by degree according to the length of lamb hair, curliness, and quality of the skin. More than 40 pieces of lambskin are necessary to make a medium class lambskin robe. Tibetans make robes that are beautiful and practical as well as comfortable.
@elzorrotacneno - Ricardo De Spirito Balbuena.
El mas potente extracto del mundo para extraer metales pesados del cuerpo. https://t.co/VsIR2ICNFy
Video Transcript AI Summary
Detoxify heavy metals with this green juice made from cilantro, cucumber, green apple, lemon, and ginger. Cilantro acts as a natural chelator, helping the body eliminate accumulated mercury and aluminum. Combined with these other ingredients, it becomes a powerful formula. Use a pure juicer to extract the insoluble fiber, which is not digested. Once the juice is ready, pour it into a glass and add spirulina, another fantastic ingredient for removing heavy metals. Find all the information for this protocol in the video description. Share and enjoy, because this is health.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Desintoxicación de metales pesados con este jugo verde. Los ingredientes que lleva son cilantro, pepino, manzana verde, limón y jengibre. ¿Por qué cilantro? Porque se ha comprobado a través de la historia y la ciencia que el cilantro es un quelante natural, ayudando al cuerpo a eliminar el mercurio y El aluminio acumulado por años, y por supuesto, que la combinación con estos otros ingredientes hace que sea una fórmula magistral. Vean cómo sale Fibra no soluble, la cual no digerimos, prácticamente seca, gracias a este extractor puro, el cual se los recomiendo ampliamente.
Una vez Que tengan el jugo hecho lo sirven en un vaso y le agregan la espirulina, otro fantástico ingrediente para eliminar metales pesados. En la descripción del video tendrán toda la información para llevar adelante este protocolo. Compartan y disfruten, porque esto es salud.
@frankyclarke - Franky
#StratosphericAerosolInjection #GeoEngineering #chemtrails
@Agent131711 - Agent131711
👇🏽👀👇🏽 Accountant: "Check your insurance policy for #Nanotechnology!!!"... #Chemtrails #GeoEngineering https://t.co/WmLW2IrWYf
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm an accountant and I want to discuss the exclusion of nanotechnology from insurance coverage. It seems that insurance companies are covering terrorism but not nanotechnology.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm an accountant and I received
Speaker 1: How is your notice to drop to a conclusion then?
Speaker 0: Okay. I have something with regards to they're excluding nanotechnology from coverage.
Speaker 1: You are addressing us, ma'am.
Speaker 0: Oh, I am sorry. They are excluding nanotechnology from insurance coverage where they are covering terrorism. Insurance companies. They're covering terrorism, but they're excluding nanotechnology.
@10121Ws - WS 10121
John D. Rockefeller et les origines de la médecine moderne En 1910, la Fondation Rockefeller a financé le rapport Flexner, commandé par le Council on Medical Education par l’intermédiaire de l’American Medical Association. L’intention de ce rapport était d’évaluer et de https://t.co/N3O7hcyMei
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1872, Rockefeller gained control over 90% of oil companies, but in 1911, the Supreme Court split his company, Standard Oil, into 34 independent ones due to violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. However, this didn't change Rockefeller's intentions. He aimed to bankrupt America. Meanwhile, petrochemicals were being transformed into pharmaceuticals, posing a threat to Rockefeller's interests in natural health. To gain control, he donated money to medical schools and hired Flexner to study their curriculum. This led to the establishment of allopathic medicine, which uses unnatural substances to treat diseases, forming the basis of Western medicine.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 18/72, Rockefeller bought up, shut down, or bankrupt 90% of the oil companies. Our good old constitution came into place, and in 1911, the Supreme Court found Rockefeller in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act and split Standard Oil into 34 independent companies, so they said, you can't have the monopoly on this, you're done. You think that changed who he was? No. He promised to bankrupt America.
At that very same time, they were learning how to turn petrochemicals exactly what he had at his fingertips that's with the oil into pharmaceuticals. Now John d Rockefeller's biggest threat was natural health. So what does he do? Being the businessman he is, he donates money to the medical schools because he wants to control. And what do you do when you wanna control someone?
You give them money. And then he hired a guy by the name of Flexner to study the school's curriculum, to figure out what they were teaching everybody, and to persuade the government to establish allopathic medicine, which use the unnatural substances to treat diseases. This is how western medicine was founded.
@gunsnrosesgirl3 - Science girl
Slow-motion footage capturing objects descending into fluids with mesmerizing fluid motion effects https://t.co/bBY6SCwQcR
@Skydive888 - Skydive
The Great Taking -- Documentary Final step leading to the Zionist Great Reset world takeover. This is what brings it all together, makes it hard to stop. Incredibly devious. Please watch and share.
Video Transcript AI Summary
David Webb, a former finance professional, shares his insights on the current state of the global financial system. He explains how the creation of money by central banks has outpaced real economic growth, leading to a breakdown in the transmission mechanism between money creation and economic activity. Webb believes that this breakdown in the velocity of money is the underlying reason for many geopolitical issues. He also discusses the changes in banking and securities laws that have allowed for the control and confiscation of collateral by secured creditors. Webb emphasizes the need for public banking and the dismantling of the private control of central banks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name is David Webb. I live in Stockholm, Sweden. I'm on a small farm here. It's important to understand I am not giving financial advice. The book I've done has a greater purpose than that.
I am not active in the markets. I'm not short the market. I am in things like farmland. I was managing public equities and ultimately hedge funds through the aftermath Of the Asian financial crisis, the lead up to the .com bubble and bust. And I noticed that fund flows We're very large relative to the size of the US economy, for example, or the global economy.
So I started to look at the Scale of money creation by the Federal Reserve. And I developed the insight that the Fed was actually influencing saying the financial markets, which no one would be surprised at today. But at that time, it was considered conspiracy theory even by my This was something I could not talk to people about, but I began studying it myself. And I saw that in individual weeks, The scale of new money created was on the order of 1% of US GDP or more. Now what that meant, Given that the US economy was growing at maybe 3% or 4% in a good year, to have money creation And on that scale in a single week, it meant that the money creation was far outstripping any real economic growth.
So the transmission mechanism for money creation into real economic activity was breaking down. This is when I started becoming concerned and started following this closely. And it actually developed into a way for me to navigate the markets. So I applied it and I managed to protect people who I was responsible to as my clients through the .com bubble and bust and did very well through that period armed with this understanding. But the bigger understanding was that the Velocity of money was collapsing.
And I knew at that time, this is over 20 years ago, that we were headed into Something like the time that the world experienced through the period of the great wars and the great depression because this kind of velocity of money was occurring at that time. So I went into this deeply and studied everything that was happening leading into the a century saw that this provided the best analogous period for understanding what we were entering then. So I have followed this very closely. I have applied it in my work in what I was doing. So I had an effective understanding of it.
The important thing to understand now is that the velocity of money, which is the relationship between economic growth and money or money creation, Money supply has broken down and is now at a lower level velocity of money than it was at any point during the Great depression and the world wars. So I believe that this is actually the profound underlying reason For the many things we are seeing geopolitically. I grew up in a family of medical people and engineers. They were not involved In high finance. As a boy, I went through basically the beginning of the industrial collapse Of Cleveland.
They say that people strive to get control over what has hurt them. And I grew up with a real need to understand what was destroying us because It deeply affected my family, which had been very happy prior to this. A happy, benevolent family, And it literally destroyed the place where I grew up. So I decided to study business and finance. This was something my My father did not want me to do.
He thought I should be an engineer. And when I was younger, I thought I would have been a medical doctor, but this became the pressing thing for me to understand. So I studied finance and computer science. I got a subscription to The Wall Street Journal. I had no one to guide me.
I just started looking at the Wall Street Journal, and I noticed these tombstones, which announced the big mergers positions, deals, or financing that all these firms were in New York. So I decided at a young age, I needed to go to New York. And I got a job with a computer services firm. I could program. I had studied systems analysis and finance.
So in this 1st year as a young guy, I went into perhaps literally every financial firm in New York City with the Sales teams. So that helps a person, I think, to begin to understand things on an intuitive just by seeing things. It's not so intimidating once you've been into these places. Things are intimidating if you've never encountered them. So that all happened in my 1st year.
And then one of my clients, which was mergers and acquisitions group, There 2 analysts were leaving. 1 was going to Harvard Business School. The other was going to the London office. And the sales Guy that I worked with on that account came back and told me that they needed someone with a background in finance Computers, and I realized at that time that was gonna be me. So I talked with my wife about it.
I showed up at this office so early the next day. Nobody was There, I had to wait about an hour for people to start coming in and they were shocked that I thought that I had any business suggesting that I could work there. They proceeded to put me through a shocking, Stressful morning. I was ushered into one of the senior vice presidents who listened to what I had to say, and And then he said, well, you better be sure you wanna do this because if you fuck up, you're gone. By the time I left, I thought maybe this wasn't such a good idea.
I probably shouldn't have bothered. You know, sure enough, they called back. They needed me because I knew how to do things. So I worked M and A mergers and acquisitions for 5 years in this firm. It was working literally around the clock, Sometimes for days with no sleep or maybe just lying on the office floor for half an hour to get up and continue.
So I learned to deal with a lot of stress with little sleep through this period of time. And then I managed to move to What was then the biggest private equity firm in the world by an order of magnitude. I chose to go there Rather than say, I had another offer from mergers and acquisitions group at L. F. Rothschild that would have been for about twice compensation, but I sense that there was gonna be a crash of some kind.
And a month later It was Black Monday, October of 87, and LF Rothschild was wiped out, lost all of its capital. I really went to this private equity firm because when you're doing M and A, it's basically being a glorified salesman. You're an agent. When you're in the Shoes of the private equity investment firm, you were the principal. It's a different kind of due diligence and analysis.
And I was there for 3 years, but it was very intensive 3 years. And shortly after I had started with the firm, I ended up running the acquisition of this long distance telephone company. I handled all of it Because the partner on the deal had difficulty with stress, and he literally went home and stayed in bed for 6 months. I handled all the due diligence, which was very complicated and the financing. And it ended up being the Largest capital gain in the history of the firm, but it was very stressful for my family because once again, I was working Around the clock, I would get up to negotiations on Saturday morning, late into 3 in the morning, Saturday I sleep for a few hours, start again on Sunday morning.
This went on for 9 months. When it was over, it took a few months, but my wife Eventually said to me, you know, if I knew our life was gonna be like this, I wouldn't have signed up for it. And that just crushed me. I got out a road atlas of the US. We went through it page by page and just thought about where could we go, where could we be happy?
I couldn't stay in that. There was a possibility I would go to their London office, but I knew that would even be more intense. It would just be more of the same. Once I've Done something. I don't need to keep doing it.
I learned what I have to learn from it. I think I am different than other people in this financial world because I actually don't care about the money. That is not why I'm doing it. That should just kind of fall out of what you're doing, and you don't need a lot of it. There's no reason that you need more and more and more.
I was always driven by understanding things, and that actually gave me an advantage. I understood things that other people didn't. So ultimately, we just decided to go back to Cleveland where I grew up, and we bought a house that was within the sound of the church bells where my grandfather's house was. My memory from Sundays when my dad would take us to grandpa's house. So I was really going home to try to make things sane, But the intensity returned.
Again, as I got into managing in the public markets, I had this insight that The public markets were even less efficient than the private markets because you had these big fund flows that were pushing things way up beyond where a negotiated deal would ever be done and driving prices down below where it would be done. You got better opportunities to both buy and sell things. I ended up ultimately running this hedge fund strategy that I Create it. So I designed the trading desk. I trained the people, developed this team trading strategy.
Through the .com bubble and the bus, we were typically in 3 to 400 positions at the same time. I had developed A strategy to be short the market using hundreds of positions so that all these crazy .com stocks, no one Position could kill us. But with all of these positions, we had a kind of visibility into the market and the fund flows And what was happening? We were doing exceptionally well. People couldn't figure out how we were doing so well.
So we had these consultants coming from literally all over the world flying into Cleveland and coming to the Office, the macro thing I was looking at was this rate of money growth. It's always growing, whether it was Accelerating or decelerating. And I knew we had maybe a day or two lead time. Once I saw the figures to get positioned ahead of the market rolling over or the market accelerating upwards, And other people didn't understand this. Even if I explained it to them, they didn't wanna hear about it.
They didn't know how to apply it. It was like that. In addition that I've always operated with a mental model of what is happening in the world. And I suppose I'm different than other people and that the Things I pay attention to is what does not fit my model. That is what can kill you.
So I pay attention to what does not make sense to me. What does not fit? You have to drop everything. Imagine you're in a highly leveraged position with hundreds of positions. When something comes up that does not fit, you pay attention to that immediately.
So the trading room was a newsroom, A research operation, so we paid attention to things 2nd by 2nd, and We would dig into things that did not make sense. So through this period of time, I also started changing, I think, as a person The peak because I was seeing things that were not in the narrative, the news narrative that people were Tempting about what was happening, so I knew that economic data series were being changed. This is after September 11th, as well as all the disconnects around September 11th itself. So it was the beginnings of my Becoming a kind of activist, although I didn't know it, I wrote quarterly letters to my clients. So I assembled things on my desk.
They would accumulate, and I eventually had something like a thick telephone book of just the things that I knew in and it documented that did not conform with the accepted narratives that people were being shown through the media. And I then Thinned this down to a thinner telephone book and literally started going door to door to my neighbors. And what I was doing was I was Seeing how I could get through to people, how could I explain this? And it's damn difficult. Basically, It doesn't work.
I decided that maybe my neighbors were too well off to be able to hear about this. So I actually went out to a Four area, and the guy was sitting on his front porch, and he was interested in what I was doing because I was still in a business suit. I explained it to him, And he just said, good luck, man. But in this voice of someone who really knew already and had a kind of resignation that there was much you can about it. So it's been a long journey for me trying to expose things.
I was expecting that there were going to be large scale insolvencies after the housing bubble. I was aware of what happened during the housing bubble and how that was engineered. In 2003, I met with George Soros. I showed him a Chart of the growth in asset backed securities, and I told him that this would be the basis of the next bubble and collapse. And he said to me, you're crazy.
So he either did not know that or he did not want to acknowledge it at that time in 2003. So what was happening was tremendous growth in the derivatives complex. So I started becoming concerned about derivatives in the very early 2000s in the aftermath of the .com bubble. At that time, The derivatives complex was about twice global GDP. By 2007, it was 10 times Global GDP that growth in maybe 5 or 6 years.
So the financialization was outstripping any real thing on earth already at that point. And this growth in asset backed Securities. What was happening was that the process of doing any credit underwriting, the moorings had been slipped, And this was done by design. Prior to this, banks would do credit underwriting, meaning they wouldn't want to get repaid money they had loans, so they would do Some analysis of whether the borrower could repay it. But during this period of time, the banking industry went to securitization of loans.
So it became a business of originating loans without any concern as to whether they could be Okay. The loans were all packaged up whether they were triple a loans or subprime loans or boat loans or Car loans, anything. These pools were stratified. Now if you think of it, you had a top 20%, the next twenty percent and so on down to bottom. And the idea was that any defaults would hit the bottom rated tranche first.
So for the defaults in that pool to reach the top of the pool, the top 20%, you'd have to blow through 80% of all the capital in the pool. So the top was rated triple a. Just structurally, they do that. The problem was no one wanted to buy the lower rated tranches. So they then used An aspect of the derivatives market, the credit default obligation, CDO, to buy the default protection for the lower rated tranches.
Then they could sell the entire pool as AAA. So this was done through as Greenspan called it, the miracles of modern finance. And he said, presumably, the risk will be borne by those best able to bear that risk at the time. So because it could all be sold as AAA and the yields were better than Treasuries and the fed was creating so much liquidity. These pools were then sold 10 times over on a modeled synthetic basis also in the derivatives market.
And so while the banks knew that they did not wanna eat their own cooking. The stuff that they had originated, they were buying The assets, this is the nature of a bubble. The people that know it's a fraud are still consuming the stuff that is being created through the same process. So the asset side of the balance sheets of banks were these securities that were being created through the same process. It reached a point where Credit default obligations alone were about 10% of the derivatives complex.
By the time the great financial crisis kicked off In 2008 and 2009, 10%. So credit to fallout obligations alone were the size of the global Now I wondered who is signing up to take that default risk. In the early stages, people are saying, well, the problem here is maybe in the 100 It's billions. They were off by an order of magnitude. It was in the tens of trillions.
So as the Fed were injecting all of this created money into the banks. It eventually became clear that the default risk had been taken by hedge fund subsidiaries within the banks themselves. So they enabled this whole thing by creating The entities within the banks that would take the other side of the default risk. And then when the collapse occurred, they were given the money to paper over that loss. The fed has murky powers that people don't know about until they decide to make it visible.
One of their powers is to create Entities out of nothing, you just create a limited liability company, and then the Fed can loan money, create money, and put it into that entity. It's completely off balance sheet. It doesn't have to be disclosed anywhere. But in this case, they did. They created something called Maiden Lane, which is a street I I sometimes walk down in this other district of Manhattan and the financial district.
So Maiden Lane was extended. This created money To buy these problematic positions out of the bags, take them off the hands of the banks. And there was so much of this problematic stuff that they then created a maiden lane 2 and a maiden lane 3. And who knows what else was created that we were not told about? So in 2008, I noticed The 1st failure of a broker dealer.
So I was expecting there to be a lot of insolvencies, and I was paying attention. And the thing that shocked me was that the client accounts in this broker dealer We're encumbered in the bankruptcy estate of the broker that never could have happened before. In all of the history of securities. They were personal property. And if the broker failed, you would say, I'm sorry, you're out of business.
Here's where you can transfer my assets. That did not happen in this case. So I started digging into what could possibly have changed, and this was as serious As a heart attack, given that we were going into this meltdown at that time, that's when I Discovered it had been done through changes to the uniform commercial code in the United States. This had been done in all 50 dates. So it was something that could be done very quietly over a long period of time and did not have to be done at the federal level, didn't draw attention.
What they did was to create a new legal construct of a security entitlement. Now prior to this, as I said, securities for 400 years were personal property. This concept of a security entitlement severed that. That's its purpose. So what people then have in institutions and in pension funds, even sophisticated investors, all they have is an entitlement.
It's a claim. It's a contractual claim, which is very weak in the event of insolvency. So it's an appearance of ownership. It's sometimes referred to as beneficial ownership, which sounds nice. But what it means is that You receive dividends.
You receive a proxy. You are the owner of title. You can of course, you can buy it and sell it, But you can see in documents that I've found that the legal owner is actually the entity that controls the Security with a secured interest. They are the legal owners of the property. So now you have a contractual claim.
Next, all of the Securities are held in pooled form, so you have no specific identification. It used to be that with paper certificates, they were numbered. You had a specific numbered bond or stock share certificate. So now they're fungible, fungible bulk, book entry Form pooled further, we know and it is absolutely irrefutable from the Fed's own response to a questionnaire from the EU that even segregated accounts, even people or institutions instead of being told that their securities are segregated are in the same pool and entitled to only a Pro rata share in the event of an insolvency of the custodian. So again, segregation is just an appearance.
People are told that it's an absolute subterfuge. And the shocking thing is that even sophisticated institutional investors do not understand this or they don't want to know it. Further, even if fraud, outright fraud is committed by the custodian. That does not obviate the ability of the secured creditors to take the securities from these Bulls ahead of the people who thought they owned them. Then there was in 2005, a change to the bankruptcy law in The United States creating something called safe harbor.
Again, that sounds nice, but what safe harbor means is safe harbor for The secured creditors to take the client assets and to make that absolutely certain that even in the event of fraud, they will take the client assets. So prior to this change in bankruptcy law, there is something called fraudulent transfer, fraudulent conveyance. And the Trustee, the bankruptcy trustee had a duty to claw back any assets that have been fraudulently transferred. So this change was made in 2005. And then with the failure of Lehman others.
This was cemented in case law, and we can see the judgment by the bankruptcy court related to this. What happened there was that JPMorgan was both the custodian for the client assets and the secured creditor that took the client assets, which prior to 2005, everything that happened there would have been constructively fraudulent. But the bankruptcy judge, this is the Southern District of New York, which is Manhattan, found in favor of JPMorgan. That JPMorgan absolutely He was entitled to take client assets. The only question was whether JPMorgan was an entitled person, basically to take the client assets.
This is an important point because it's not all secured creditors that have this power to take the client assets. It is only the very biggest banks that are entitled to take the client assets. So they don't want anyone else elbowing in there to take anything. Only they will take them. And in this judgment, the judge asked the question, Is JPMorgan a member of the protected class?
Used explicitly those words And said quite obviously as one of the biggest banks in the world, biggest financial institutions, JPMorgan is quite obviously a member of the protected To see this in a bankruptcy case law from the court, I think that's pretty strong stuff. It's Like that document directly from the fed provided to the legal certainty group. This is hard to refute. A custodian has the records of who owns what. It's in their books and records, but that's all it is.
It is the records. The system has been changed so that the property itself is then transferred up to a higher level and held in pool form. So you deal with your broker to execute a trade to buy or sell nothing, and you get a representation of an account that shows you what you have in it. But the assets are not held even at what you think is your custodian. It's Transfer to a higher level in the US.
That is the depository trust corp, which holds all securities in the United States in pool form. So the brokers themselves are low down in the food chain. In Europe, there are central security at the national level. They'd give an appearance of a registry of ownership at the national level, but by law, Under something called the Central Security Depository Regulation, CSDR, which was imposed in fourteen. By law, these securities are transferred by a mandatory link to an international central securities depository.
So they want cross border mobility of the collateral to occur. So in Sweden, for example, you have a local registry, but then the securities go up to Euroclear Belgium. So So they are subject to Belgian law, not Swedish law at that level. And then the collateral is transported To underpin the derivatives complex, which is housed at the central clearing counter parties. The acronym is the CCPs.
So this is the purpose to take the collateral up to this central clearing counterparty level. And we know from a BIS document that is now over 10 years old that The systems are in place for the movement of this collateral on a global basis nearly instantaneously, Especially in a crisis to be swept to meet the collateral demands of the system, the secured creditors. Also associated with this, we have to understand derivatives used to be bilateral, you knew When you entered into a contract who your counterparty was and you look to the credit quality of that counterparty, they were on the other side in the name of reducing risk, they actually increased risk. They created a monolithic risk because they forced central clearing so that the CCP is the counterparty on all derivatives contracts. The Central clearing parties are the counterparties.
Now what does that mean if the central clearing party itself fails? That means there is no counterparty there to honor the derivative contracts for all manner of things, but especially people that think that they have hedged their downside risk in the collapse. There's no counterparty, and the central clearing parties have been deliberately undercapitalized. So in Europe and the US, There are discussions by the participants themselves about the possibility of the central clearing parties failing. In the last few years, there have been discussions of And if you look at DTC itself, which houses all the securities in the US securities complex Ann is the central clearing party for most derivatives.
They have discussion of how they will Start over again when the central clearing party collapses and explicitly that they will not put more capital behind it, But they have prefunded the startup of a new central clearing party when one of the existing ones fails. So it's essentially planned, and the entire capital base of depository trust, so essentially, the entire US securities complex is housed there in all derivatives. The entire capital is $3,500,000,000. Individual banks have derivative positions the size of the global GDP. So something will happen to trigger this collapse implosion.
I would say the cake is already baked at this time. It's been made to happen because to take interest rates After having kept them at 0 for 15 years, which was insane to begin with and did not have to happen, It's made to happen. And then in essentially a year to take that back to over 5%. And if you're noticing they're not stopping, the rates are continuing up. I'll go through what that means For the global financial system, when interest rates were at 5%, if a bond paid $5 to simplify this.
Let's say it's a perpetuity, which means you don't have to take into account a maturity date. So if it pays $5, it's worth $100. We would pay $100 for that because interest rates are 5%. Now if interest rates are driven down by the central bank to 1% and the bond still pays $5, Now 5 is 1% of $500. So the value of the bond goes up fivefold by dropping interest This rates like that.
And it was even further because they took it to 0. So this is the source of the bubble, the financial bubble that we've experienced, the everything bubble as some people call it. And the entire financial System is basically a perpetuity. So everything is based on discounting cash flows. So all real State, the entire stock market is based on discounting back theoretical future cash flows from companies as well as bonds.
Now if you do a round trip on this and you take interest rates back from 1% back to over 5%, which is something like what has happened here. You reverse the entire thing, and you have an 80% fall in value Of everything, everything, all commercial real estate, the stock market, everything. Now imagine what happens to you if you own these things on leverage, If you borrowed to own these things, that's the problem. So the entire run up, the entire bubble was artificial, and the decline Mine will be something like a decimation where indexes will go to maybe 10% of the peak because a lot of things will just go out of business. And this is what happened with the whole .com sector when that bubble collapsed.
This is what happened in the 19 thirties. This is what happened to the Nikkei with Japan. All bubbles end this way. And when you step back and look at them, it's like a very sharp mountain peak that goes into, like, a needle blow off, and you get a 1st break and then a second run for the top that fails, and that's where we are now. If you step back and you look at something like the NASDAQ index, the 2nd top that's failing now, which is understandable given that bond yields are continuing straight up.
So when this begins imploding, the insolvencies will increase due to the level of debt. And there will be an automatic call for more collateral that will be transferred into to the derivatives complex in the central clearing counterparties. But the central clearing counterparties are themselves likely Exposed to the collapse because I say to people that you may think that you've Hedge your exposure to a decline here, but you've done it through the derivatives complex. So the risk is in the derivatives complex. It doesn't disappear, Here doesn't go away.
It's all there. And this pain will accumulate in the central clearing counter parties, and then they will fail. And they're basically telling us they will fail. And when that happens, the people that thought that they had hedged their exposure included the most Cated institutions and the pension funds will have no protection, and the secured creditors will take all of the underlying Stocks and bonds, which then gives them control of all public corporations. And once you control the capitalization structure, you then control all of the underlying real things.
So this is something like what happened in the 19 thirties When there was distress globally everywhere due to debt levels, and you would think that there were no winners, But there were because the banks that were controlled by the Federal Reserve, for example, in the US, were Slated to survive, 9,000 banks in the United States were forced into failure. The people who had money in those Banks lost all their cash, but their debts were not canceled. Their debts were then consolidated into the Federal Reserve System and Enforced. So people that were in debt were in trouble. Even wealthy people lost everything.
The difference this time around is they're not going after just property that is encumbered by debt. They've engineered this so they can take things, all securities as collateral from people and entities that have no borrowings against them. They own them clear and outright. Now let me give you an example as analogy to explain the horror of this. So you have bought a car and you paid cash for it.
You think you're being very conservative. You have no debt against the car. But Unbeknownst to you, the dealer continues to control your car as collateral. You're not told this, the dealer uses your car and all the other cars sold by the dealer as collateral for his borrowing in his business. Now the dealer goes bust and only certain Secured creditors are empowered to immediately take your car and all the cars ever sold by the Dealer without any judicial review immediately.
When I describe this to people, they get worried about their Cars, this is not about your car. This is an analogy for what has been done. It's much worse than this being about your car because it is Literally about the entire securities complex globally. So it is not about your insolvency See, that causes the loss of your assets. It's the insolvency of the people that secretly used your collateral As their property, without telling you that or disclosing it.
How could this happen legally? It's a good question, and perhaps there is some hope for humanity in avoiding this, in challenging this whole construct because it is a construct. None of this is real. There are real things in the world. This is not a real thing, But they will try to convince us that, well, I'm sorry.
You've lost everything. It's an elaborate story. So, yes, they have changed law. Can that be challenged? That's what has to happen.
So this was the process. They changed it in the uniform commercial code. This was beginning in 1994. The efforts to affect this Actually, go back further than that into the 19 sixties when they began the process of dematerialization of securities to hold them all electronically, which some people were suspicious about then, and they were right to be suspicious. It is clear that that beginning process was literally run by the CIA, and this is not conspiracy theory.
The man who was Charged with forming the depository trust corp to do this in his own memoir and in interviews discloses that he was a career CIA operative from the time he was a young man. So there was a grand Strategic purpose behind this, they've been able to do it because it has been run from the highest levels of the US government. So the involvement of the CIA, then when this construct of the securities entitlement was put into the uniform commercial code that was pushed Through all 50 states done quietly. That change was made in 1994. So it took Maybe 10 years to get it done in all the states, then they changed the bankruptcy law in 2005, and then it was ready to go with the testing of the Lehman Brothers case in 2008.
So there's a plan that's executed over decades to do this. Then they began a process of harmonization, which was to force this model in law globally, and they did this through the EU. The first discussion and documents The EU is in 2002, so that's when the process was beginning then in the aftermath of the .com bus And the EU created something they call the legal certainty group. And, again, that sounds like a good thing, but what they mean is legal certainty that the secured creditors will take the client assets. And they worked at this for years figuring out how to subvert local law.
When you think about it, rights Property is kind of a sacred thing. It's something that all people should care about. And oddly enough, even the people Participating in making this happen should care about this in a big way. So therein lies the hope of addressing this. We can come back to that.
But the legal certainty group identified the problematic local law, and then it took Maybe another 10 years to come up with this CSDR regulation, Central Securities depository regulation 2014 that mandated the transport of the collateral from the local or the national level central securities depository, wherever people think They own their things outright. Their record of ownership is there, and the securities depository level and then on to the central clearing counterparties. So it has been done in law. It's been done legally. It must be attacked legally.
It must be dismantled legally. The power behind all of this is the private control of the central banks. And when you look around the world, they are all privately controlled. You were not allowed to know actually Who controls the Federal Reserve and how it is controlled? We know that it is controlled somehow by I set a banks.
So there is some kind of an ownership structure that extends through the banks that own and control the fed. But something like this is done in all central banks around the world. If you notice, any country Tree that has attempted to have a national bank is literally attacked and destroyed. They're not allowed to exist. So It is linked with the war machine, this private control of money, the intelligence agencies, the militaries globally Would not be able to function as they are if they weren't linked with this money creation power.
We now know that when we were It's perhaps we thought that the money you borrow from the bank is someone else's savings that they're giving you. It's a zero sum game. I think we now know with the scale of the money created during the COVID period that that is not the case. The scale outstrips any real world activity, and it's just created out of thin air. So this is the power that controls everything.
They control All political parties, all governments, all the major corporations, the media, and this was the case leading into the a century in this period when the velocity money was collapsing, that is basically a collapse of their control whole system. The money is a very sophisticated control system because it requires almost no Energy input. People are directed by chasing money incentives. But this power through chronic overuse, When it reaches this point where no matter how much money is created, it's not translating into actual economic growth, then it goes into a financial bubble and then you get the major collapse of the whole system, then they must have a plan and to stay in control through that collapse, which will require physical control over people through the reset because the money control system has broken down. So this is why you have a period of terrible instability.
So as we were entering the 20th That tree, velocity money was collapsing that the Qing dynasty collapsed. It's a global phenomenon that ended dynastic rule in China. Then in the During 1914 and 1918, the Turk Ottoman Empire collapsed, the Austro Hungarian Empire, the Russian Empire, Germany was destroyed, Lloyd and the British Empire had passed at Zenith and was really collapsing at that point. So it's a global collapse. And the people that Rolled the banking power through that, managed to stay in control, and they did it by subjugating populations.
It's not about taking their money. It's not about taking their stuff, which they don't need. It's about suppression and subjugation. And that's The lesson when you look at this period in the 19 thirties, and that is what they have planned For this kind of a cycle again, and they've set up for it. So this plan to take all collateral globally And to collapse the system in a kind of controlled demolition where they end up controlling everything.
This Design was set in motion over 50 years ago. It may have had a longer planning horizon than that, but we can see actual concrete steps beginning in 1960s with dematerialization. So when this is unfolding, this This wave of insolvencies, and it creates an urgency to take the collateral. People will be Terrified. They will be panicked, and we know that fear shuts down critical thinking.
So, people will be in panic mode. I've always been Trusted in what happened in the thirties because of talking about these things with my father who lived through that. And what I saw happening in Cleveland when I was boy. I'd try to talk with anyone who had lived through that time. And I asked my aunt, what had happened in the thirties.
And she said, well, suddenly, no one had any money. And I said, what do you mean? How could that be? And she said, well, no one had money and even wealthy families didn't have any money. And she knew families in which their daughters had been going into private schools, and they couldn't afford to go back to school.
When you really look at what happened there, if you close Close all the banks, which is what FDR did. He suddenly literally closed all the banks, and then Only certain banks were allowed to reopen, which were the ones controlled by the fed. Well, then suddenly no one had any money. It's not hard to imagine It's all just shut down suddenly. And then you have the problem that there was a drop in price level, Drop in activity and they kept the economic activity very suppressed for years.
And I know that from history through the thirties, my grandfather's engineering business, I know from a family letter, but by 1936, which was 3 years after the banks had reopened, there was still no business. 3 years later, they managed to get through this both sides of my family because they had No debt. People were more conservative then, but it was very difficult. Now the other thing that and was the Federal Reserve was set up with a kind of inevitable logic that they would have to take The gold from the public, which was, of course, the monetary asset backing everything then. So The gold of the public was confiscated under the complaint that the public was hoarding the gold.
But then what Did the fed do with it? The fed hoarded the gold and did not use it to expand credit. They kept the conditions tight. So what do we have This time around, gold is not the underlying collateral in this system. It's all securities globally.
So they will be taken under the argument that, well, we have to save these systemically vital institutions so that we can restart the economy again. How could we restart the economy if they are not protected? So that will be the reason given. And it's like a game of monopoly where all of the pieces, all of the money on the board are Hold back to the bank and then they say, let's start a new game. We'll start over from the basis that we have everything and you don't.
So would you like to borrow something? And this is what the CBDC, the Central Bank Digital Currency, will be. It will be very It's called for people to refuse to use it because they literally won't be able to eat. They will have an app they can download. This will be the help.
This will Be the cavalry riding to the rescue. Just download this app and you can load your phone with some Currency to allow you to go buy milk, but every time you use that, you are actually borrowing money from them. They have you. Again, It will happen very fast. This will unfold in a very frightening crisis kind of environment, and people fully refusing.
And that's why it's so important to spread this awareness of this beforehand so that people understand what happening and so that people can become engaged in this all the way to the top of the system. It has the potential to activate very capable people all the way to the top of the system. It has the potential to unify people against this. What I tried to do with this book was to stick with things I absolutely know. And to make it a kind of whole in terms of allowing one to see, irrefutably, the whole thing with the aim of pulling it out on the table so that Everyone can have a good look at it, including the participants, including the people that are making it happen.
I have the premise that This is largely being done unconsciously that the end result of this has not really been fully understood by the participants, and that perhaps Even the people at the very top of this do not understand what is about to happen and that they will be destroyed void by their own hand if they do this. So it's the result of a kind of inevitable logic that they have, that they have to control everything that has now been taken to the ultimate degree where one can see while it's an intelligent Design, it is literally insane to actually do this because no one wants this. And that the people that have inherited this ownership layer at the very top, they did not design this. They did not put it in motion. They have allowed the juggernaut to continue.
There has been no pruning in the garden. There's been no oversight. It's literally never been looked at, never been checked. It is basically run out of control unconsciously. So we have to make it conscious all the way to the top of the system.
Now another way I think about this is They study us. We have to try to imagine who we're dealing with here. So I'm getting into conjecture about this. I have known people pretty high in the system. I have this idea that people are intimidating if you have not met them.
But once you've met them, you see that they are Just people. And I think we have to understand these are just people. They are not lizards eating babies like potato chips. That is not helpful to think of it that way. So they are actually not particularly capable people.
So there is a head of the snake, but it can't do anything alone. It is relying on the muscle beneath the head of the snake to do everything for it. And that part of the purpose of this is to push this awareness up to that muscle. Now what what would that look like? It might look like people that control corporations that are doing all the work to implement this that would realize when they see this that they didn't know anything about this, which means they do not actually have a place at the table.
How might that affect their thinking? Could they have some interesting conversations with someone when they're asked to do something? Could they perhaps decide to withdraw participation? That kind of thing we need to happen, so We have to reach people at high levels in the system. Another principle is that there's not just 1 head of the snake.
It's like The hydra, there are lots of heads. And if you cut one off, another one grows back. So you have to be able to show the entirety of this because they only understand 1 piece of it. So this is like a mirror To be able to see concisely the whole of where this is going so that you can address the many headed hydra. You know, people consider that the CIA and all the intelligence organizations are much like that.
As I said, the garden has not been pruned. There's been no oversight here, so they're all running within their missions essentially out of control. Those people also need to be aware of where this is going. Now there are people that are actual Criminals that are killers in this, but they are not the people running things. Actually, if the money is just cut off to these entities, it stops.
I think that we're very close to this collapse being triggered. What are the indications for that? Well, most profoundly, what has been done to interest rates and where they are now and the Scale of the insolvencies that are out there, they're not being discussed. They're being covered up. The only way That the financial system has not collapsed is that there is a big hidden hand injecting lots of created money directly into the financial markets holding them up right now, as well as allowing Tutions to believe they have downside risk by buying protection in the derivatives market, the combination of those things.
So This support, the hidden hand as I call it, can be withdrawn at the time of their choosing, but we're getting late in this process given what's It's already happened at the interest rates. The other indication of timing is the bank resolution, the documents So the bank resolution authority in Europe, their planning cycle documents were mandating all of the globally Systemically important banks to be ready for a solvent wind down at the end of last year, 2022. Now what they mean by Solvent wind down is not wind down of the entire bank on a solid basis. It will be parts of the bank that will main solvent, but they've literally mandated that they have to be ready, the biggest banks, to go flat on all of their derivatives positions in a controlled way suddenly. So they prepared for that.
That is operational as of then last year. Now In this year's planning cycle document, they are saying that they are on track to have completed all their work by end of this year 2023. So these are indications to give you another idea of the seriousness of this. They've been running these trilateral exercises with Britain and the EU In the US for 6 of the 7 past years, I think they may have missed a year during COVID. But in these exercises From the US side, the participants are the US treasury secretary, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, The chairman of the FDIC, the heads of all these entities in this exercise, which I've never seen before with anything.
So they're very, very serious about this. And these exercises are about assuring the cross border Transfer of the collateral when the banks are put into wind down. So you've noticed in the news that there have been some failures of banks in the last year, and that is due to this increase, this backup in interest rates, and the idea that this is a bank specific problem is not the case. These are the canaries in the coal mine. This is absolutely systemic.
Again, looking back at the 19 thirties for guidance Here, the 1st big bank failure was in 1930. It was allowed to happen, and there was a kind of trickle of bank failures. So The bank holiday when they closed everything was until 1933. So it was an unfolding banking prices for 3 years. So it's not unusual that you would have an opening stage here of a number of banks It failed, but it doesn't all let loose immediately.
It unfolds over months and perhaps a couple of years before you hit the point where everything's free fall. Well, How could things be better here? How could this go well? We have to imagine that. It seems to be overwhelming.
But the first step is to Get this awareness up to the highest levels so that people realize we don't want this to happen. It's been taken to an Sane extreme, and it's not gonna go well for anyone. Then people are left with this idea that, well, everything will just collapse. And I don't believe that at all. There is a real world with real economic activity that goes on despite This system that extracts resources from people and places enormous stress on them that Funds, psychological operations that are, of course, public facing.
They're used against the population so that the resources of the public are Distracted, tremendous burdens are placed on people, stresses. It's a system that subjugates people. And if that simply stops, Everything gets better immediately. Now how could things be different? Central banking should be a Public utility, the very idea that it should be controlled by private interests, that is the Source of all the problems for humanity that must stop as a public utility.
You know, of course, banking is a useful thing to have. We have to realize we don't have to go back to sticks and stones. We don't want everything burned to the We have to take back control of our society, which has largely been created by good people, All the innovations and usurped, so we don't owe them anything. We have good things that have been created. We just have to not allow them to control these things any longer.
So public banking would be like a utility. Any profits would be returned to the public or used to support Government. We have to have government. We have to have some way to operate society and have roads and do things that work for society. So anarchy and chaos, we can't have that.
So this has to be done peacefully. It has to be done legally. Another concept. And these are not my ideas on borrowing these things in terms of public banking, but also something like The tax system, which is really a way of harassing and, again, subjugating People, we know with the scale of money creation, things are not being funded from our tax dollars. But if we had A stable system, some kind of share of economic resources are needed to operate the government.
A very simple way to do that is to place a Simple fee on every electronic money transfer wouldn't be needed for paper currency, just every electronic money transfer. We know today that the major corporations don't pay any taxes. They aren't supporting anything. So money flows. It could be a fraction of a and especially if you end all of the wars, if you wind down the military bases, if you Of all the covert actions which are criminal, the scale of government can be right sized to what is actually beneficial to humanity.
As I say, we're being governed by constructs. They aren't even real. And if they don't Serve humanity, they must be stopped. And if we're gonna have artificial constructs, they must serve humanity. So imagine How people would feel if they were told, you don't have to file taxes anymore.
That's all gonna be handled. Just pay a tenth of a percent on whatever electronic Transfer you're doing. But the people that run this system don't want those kinds of solutions because they would eliminate their control. So my purpose with this book is to create something that will show the entirety of what this is and where it's going to do it with an economy of information and just Hard, irrefutable information and to put this in something that can travel. And that is happening.
And I know already that it has reached billionaires, it's reached people all over the world, It's reached people that manage a lot of money have responsibility for that. People in Buenos Aires and Vancouver and New Zealand and Monaco, London. So it is happening. That's what we have to have happen. And we need people at the Top of the system that are not 6 degrees separation from the head of the state, but are more like 1 or 2 degrees from the head of Snake to become aware of this and start to say something about it and start to do something about it because they realize that They are not going to be protected.
As I say toward the end of the book, wealthy people think they're special. You are special. They're saving you for dessert. And you let that sink in. So everybody has to get busy with this, Including people who believe that they are powerful and they can make a difference.
And it needs to be done legally, needs to be opposed through legal means. I mean, imagine what would happen if judges in important positions become aware of this Prosecutors, this has never really been examined in terms of how it can be dismantled. And there will be ways to do this because it is just a construct. So in terms of advice to people, and again, I can't give you financial advice. I don't know your personal I would start by saying that your happiness is important and the happiness of your family.
And you should not let financial considerations cause you to do something that will drive your family in The despair. You have to be able to get through these years. But if there are things you can do that might actually give you a relief of stress, you should consider doing those things. And one of those might be to eliminate all debt. So you have to get over this notion that you you should use borrowed money to control more stuff.
They want you to do that because when the price level falls, you won't be able to service that debt. So you take advantage of this Time remaining to sell things to pay off your debts. It does make sense to have money in the financial markets when you also have debt. There are people I know who have sold their homes, which is a tough decision to make, and are simply renting to make sure that they're not in debt at all. So you have to ask yourself, these are personal decisions, how that feels for you to do that?
Another principle is to get real, so to speak. To invest in real things, avoid Constructs and intermediaries, you want to hold things directly, have good title to them things that you can hold like that such as land, buildings and land. And you want to think about if This goes into a difficult period of years, and this can be a positive thing is to have an ability to produce food. In the thirties It's for both sides of my family. They weren't farmers, but they had to have recourse to family that had farms in order to supplement their food.
It was important. So again that can be done in a positive way. You put money into building a greenhouse, Have a big garden and orchard. Might choose to live in a more rural area. Talking with people who went through the depression, There was 1 friend of mine, much older than me.
I knew he had lived through the depression, and I asked him about it. And he said, well, you know, both my My parents were killed in an automobile accident. So I was on my grandfather's farm, and I was not aware that there was a depression. So he was on this farm with his cousins, that tells you something. As a child, they were just fine.
The book I've written is called The Great Taking, and you can find it on a landing page At the great taking .com, there is a free PDF you can download. I've done it this way because it will make it close to 0 friction so it can spread globally, and that is really happening. Some people would say, well, surely, you must be paid something for this. And I know that if I had been paid anything, I would just use it to spread the book. So why do that?
Make it 0 friction. This is the most important thing I can do right now. There are hard copy The books you can get through Lulu, and those cost something because it cost something to produce them, and they can be delivered globally. There is some Small profit in that, but I am directing that to another person who is a scientist and has done very important work.
@elzorrotacneno - Ricardo De Spirito Balbuena.
Se descubre plan para la censura mundial. https://t.co/x4KbKAzyfc
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses a plan for global censorship, revealing how the US government recruited NGOs and individuals to censor and subvert the American people. The goal was to replace terms like propaganda and censorship with "cognitive security" to control people's beliefs. The speakers emphasized the need to change people's narratives and beliefs subtly. They also mentioned the use of different methods and messages for different audiences based on their existing biases. The speakers admitted to being part of a private NGO working under the supervision of the US military to censor American citizens. They discussed tactics such as disarming protests, influencing public opinion through fake accounts and infiltrating private groups, and pressuring banks to close accounts. The full details can be found on Substack.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Visita Pachamamaflat punto TV. Se expone amplio plan para la censura global. La audiencia en Substack ha recibido documentos de un denunciante Que fue reclutado para participar en la Liga de Inteligencia de Amenazas Cibernéticas, o SETEL, a través de reuniones de ciberseguridad Organizadas por el Departamento de Seguridad Nacional. Estos documentos revelan cómo los Estados Unidos, El gobierno reclutó una red de ONGs y personas particulares para hacer lo que el gobierno no puede hacer legalmente, Censurar y subvertir al pueblo estadounidense. Las operaciones eran dirigidas por la contratista militar Sarah Jane Turp y Pablo Brewer, de los Estados Unidos.
Un objetivo principal era reemplazar palabras como propaganda y censura Por el término seguridad cognitiva, en el espíritu de la industria de
Speaker 1: la ciberseguridad. La inseguridad cognitiva es lo que quieres tener, quieres Básicamente se trata de contaminación. Entonces, la desinformación es una forma de contaminación en internet Y solo porque vamos a recibir comentarios sobre esto, mi posición al respecto es clara y siempre ha sido clara. No queremos eliminar las voces de la gente. Lo que estamos intentando eliminar son los megáfonos artificiales.
Escribieron que
Speaker 0: el tercer pilar del entorno de la información Debería ser la dimensión cognitiva, que es simplemente otra forma de decir control mental.
Speaker 1: No intentamos la gente crea mentiras la mayor parte del tiempo. La mayoría de las veces intentas cambiar sus creencias y, de hecho, a un nivel mucho más profundo estás Intentando cambiar cambiar ligeramente su narrativa interna, o al menos usar sus narrativas internas.
Speaker 0: Brewer explicó cómo esta ingeniería social cognitiva debe ser personalizada para los estadounidenses.
Speaker 2: Diferente audiencias van diferentes métodos de entrega y diferentes mensajes, y eso es porque ellos tienen estos sesgos sociales y cognitivos pre existentes. Entonces, ciertamente, si hablas con el ciudadano chino promedio, creerán absolutamente que la gran cortafuegos Juegos de China no está ahí para la censura, creen que está ahí porque la República Popular China y el partido comunista chino quieren proteger a sus ciudadanos y creen absolutamente que eso es y creen absolutamente que eso es algo bueno. Si el gobierno de Estados Unidos intentase vender esa narrativa, Perderíamos la cabeza por completo y diríamos, no, no, no, esto es una violación de nuestros derechos de la primera enmienda. Por lo tanto, ¿los mensajes dentro y fuera del grupo a menudo tienen que ser diferentes?
Speaker 0: Otro término que utilizaron para justificar sus crímenes contra el pueblo estadounidense Es asociación público privada para evitar la violación de los derechos constitucionales de los estadounidenses. Los ciudadanos privados hacen el trabajo sucio bajo la supervisión del gobierno. Thirp y Brewer admiten abiertamente que están creados Como una ONG privada para censurar a los ciudadanos estadounidenses por el ejército estadounidense.
Speaker 2: Tengo dos funciones Y mencioné que una representa mi papel como director del grupo Donovan, que es un grupo de expertos y estudios futuros y Think Tang. En mi otro rol, soy lo que llaman un responsable de innovación. Soy uno de los responsables de innovación de softwares, una organización No lucrativa, completamente no clasificada y financiada por el comando de operaciones especiales de los Estados Unidos. Y eso es para que podamos abordar problemas y tácticas no tradicionales y trabajar con socios no tradicionales.
Speaker 0: Se dirigieron a personas que protestaban contra los cierres y desarrollaron el marco de desarme, que fue empleado por la Organización Mundial de Salud para contrarrestar las campañas antivacunas. Subvierten a las empresas de redes sociales e informan sobre los dominios de sitios web A los registradores. Para influir en la opinión pública, crean cuentas falsas y se infiltran en grupos privados. Entrenan a personas influyentes para que difundan sus mensajes y presionan a los bancos para que cierren las cuentas de las personas. Para obtener más información sobre esto, dirígete al público en Substack, que presionará a nuestros funcionarios electos con estos documentos.
Estas traducciones son gracias a tu apoyo. Gracias por suscribirte y apoyar
@LeGers32 - Département du Gers
🦆 #Média | La Ferme De Martin Neuf a été sélectionnée pour participer à l'émission de @TF1, le Grand concours des recettes de Noël, avec une « Tatin au Foie Gras » 💚 Alors, si vous aimez le Gers et l'Occitanie, votez pour eux jusqu'au 15 décembre !
@curro_lucas - Curro Lucas
Recursos del LITIO a escala, comparativamente por país y con referencia al tamaño de Venecia. El 80% del litio, es empleado en baterías de vehículos eléctricos y muy pocos países disponen del mismo. Houston, tenemos un problema...😬 📹 MetaBallStudios https://t.co/ZWD6wNElye
@Agent131711 - Agent131711
✈️☣️Man takes BLOWTORCH to Fake Snow. WATCH WHAT HAPPENS: #Chemtrails #GeoEngineering https://t.co/L1ZD7JUHYA
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is outside in the cold, trying to melt what they believe is snow using a lighter. They mention a theory called chemtrails, which suggests that chemicals sprayed in the air cause snowfall. They express disbelief when the snow does not melt and instead deteriorates. They then use a blowtorch to see if the snow will melt, but it still does not. The speaker concludes that this is not real snow.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me hurry up. It's cold out here. Let me get some get some of this
Speaker 1: so called snow. We think it's snow. Get another chunk here. Okay. Earlier today, I saw a video where someone went outside and took some snow and took a lighter and tried to melt the snow like I used to when I was a kid.
I always believed that the air was being sprayed, with chemicals, which are called chemtrails, and that this is the reason why we're finally having snow, especially in Michigan, because The theory is that geoengineering is supposed to slow down the global warming process. Well, anyway, let's get to this experiment I couldn't believe what I saw, and I wanted to try it. So I have a lighter, and to prove that the lighter is real, I'm going to light this piece of paper. As you see, it's real. And so let me take some snow.
Supposed to be snow. Put it here, and let's try to melt snow. Well, ice rather, supposedly, And that's what ice usually does. It should be water underneath right now. But as you see, it's not melting.
It's it's gonna actually start deteriorating. Look at this. I have never seen anything like this. No water. No condensation.
Anything. This is not this is not snow. This is crazy. Anyway, so I went and grabbed my map gas, which is like A blowtorch. Literally, like a blowtorch.
Let's see what happens now. Where is the water?
@ChacinasS - Chacinas De Salamanca
¿Ya has pensado en el menú de Navidad? Seguro que no falta en tu mesa una tabla de ibéricos 🤩🔝😋 #chacinasdesalamanca #mesadenavidad #ibericos #tabladeibericos https://t.co/Dz7FH8o2Qv
@Cielos_Toxicos - Cielos Toxicos
@frankyclarke @metoffice @UK_CAA @bbcweather @BBCNews #Geoengineering Short extract of Italian TV interview with Enrico Gianini, former ramp agent worker at Malpensa Airport, Italy. How he took samples of liquids used for geoengineering activities and had them analyzed https://t.co/BIA6Bwd8SE
@caissesdegreve - Caisses de grève
👀 "Chaque jour, 2,3 millions de personnes se réveillent le matin sans savoir si elles survivront jusqu'à la nuit, et dorment la nuit sans savoir si elles survivront au jour suivant. Demander un cessez-le-feu est la seule chose humainement décente à faire." @majedbamya https://t.co/cwzXxU2P4X
Video Transcript AI Summary
Israel is accused of treating all Palestinians in Gaza as terrorists and justifying their killing by labeling them as such. The speaker argues that Israel's actions amount to genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. They emphasize the urgent need for a ceasefire and criticize Israel for attacking those calling for one. The speaker also questions why there have been no consequences for Israel's actions and calls for accountability through the International Criminal Court. They highlight the ongoing displacement caused by Israeli settlements and express the Palestinian people's lack of confidence in international law's ability to protect them. The speaker concludes by urging the upholding of the law for the sake of justice and peace.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You had all these, attempts to debate the numbers. We know exactly the number of victims in Gaza. 2,300,000. All of the Palestinians in Gaza are victims. They are, killed, wounded, displaced, besieged, deprived of the objects that are essential for their survival.
Israel deals with all Palestinians as terrorists or suspected terrorists. So even human rights NGOs, human rights defenders, everybody is attacked under this, encompass all qualifications that should be rejected wholeheartedly. And when we're speaking of this Israeli assault, Effectively, Israel has told the world we can kill any Palestinian and every Palestinian in Gaza. They've told you that look look away. There's nothing to see.
If they are killed, they are either terrorists, terrorist sympathisers, or human shields. It's never our fault. We cannot be blamed. We can bomb entire neighborhoods. You can wake up and hear that 300 people have been killed, half of them are 40% children.
And there would be a very good justification for that, that we don't need to provide, except that they are either terrorists, sympathizers or human shields. And we have called that a carpet explanation for carpet bombing. It is worthless. And it was shameful that some media outlets and some politicians have echoed Such a despicable way of qualifying people, of dehumanizing people and attempting to justify their killing. So at this point, we're 2 months in.
You can believe it's a coincidence that Israel bombed the hospitals, the bakeries, 60% of homes. You can believe it's it just so happened that these were all the military targets, the shelters, Or you can believe it was actually targeting them. And why has it been targeting them to destroy, in part, all in whole, the population. We believe what is happening is that. And that has a name.
Genocide. You don't believe that is what is happening? You believe this is a widespread and systematic attack? It's crimes against humanity. Is it more acceptable now?
You don't believe that is it? It's war crimes. Is it more acceptable? There's no way around this being criminal and falling under the jurisdiction of the ICC. There's no way around it.
2 months in, anybody who is hesitant To say that this mass killing, this indiscriminate killing, this besieging, the use of humanitarian aid As a means of destruction and pressure on people. And then we can argue what are the real objectives. Why would Israel do that? They're telling you. They want the people out.
They want the question of Palestine to end. They want the Palestinians as a people to no longer exist as a people. That is the the threat they are dealing with. Is that a legitimate threat? It is not.
If you don't have a moral compass or some form of moral clarity at this point to say, this needs to stop now, and you accept any justification for such barbaric acts happening, any, you lose all credibility. You can no longer speak of international law. Put it aside. No longer speak of it anytime in your lifetime. This is it.
In every generation, we have a moment in time that is decisive for international law. We we, The Palestinian people, unfortunately, for 75 years, have have been a measuring stick of the illnesses affecting international law, the double standards that exist in international. 75 years is not new. But the level of destruction we've seen, we have not seen since 1948 on the 75th anniversary of the Nakba. And I have to tell you, Now in Gaza, every decision is a life or death decision.
You wake up in the morning, the room you decided to sleep is a life or death decision. You don't know the right decision. You decide to leave your home or stay in your home. It's a life or death decision. You are informed that there is humanitarian aid for you in this distribution center.
You got a bag of, flour. You decide to go pick it up or stay hungry? If you decide to go pick it up, that's a life or death decision. You might not make it back. Your child is wounded.
Trying to get him to a hospital is a life of death decision. Every day, 2,300,000 Palestinians are fighting for their lives every single day. 2,300,000 people wake up in the morning not knowing if they will make it to the night, sleep at night not knowing if they will make it to the next day. Calling for a ceasefire is the only human decent thing to do. But it's Israel attacking those calling for a ceasefire.
And this is my My last comment, who does that? When you're committing the crimes and you're attacking the UN, attacking Spain, attacking Belgium, attacking the Global South, attacking the NGOs. The foreign minister writing tweets against these people to try to intimidate and silence them. The prime minister of Israel making calls. Who does that in your lives?
Bullies. Bullies. And how do you stop a bully? If he sees he can get away with it, do you reason with him? Do you try to convince him?
You show him there are consequences for their actions. 9 years we have been party to the ICC. 9 years, no consequences. What is taking so long? What is so complicated in the matter in Palestine from a legal standpoint?
What is the legal delay? And I I spoke about Gaza. This is not the 1st war. We entered with a war. It was followed by several assaults on our people in Gaza Until it culminated here, because the bully was never reigned in.
They are building settlements while bombing our people in Gaza. Is there any single legal expert, a decent legal expert, that can tell me it's hard to make a case about settlements against Israeli leaders from the prime prime minister? They announce it. They're proud of it. We have a right to settle.
We will fund it. We will build it. We will help the settlers give it. We are arming the settlers so they can displace the people. They are displacing the people themselves by force or by by coercion.
You're gonna tell me there's no ever it's difficult to collect the evidence to make a winnable case about settlements? So this is a point where this institution and the people representing it And the prosecutor are facing history. They are facing the Palestinian people who are being killed and facing history. These are the Rome Statute are serious words written by serious people in serious times. The Geneva Conventions came from the Holocaust and the horrors of the 2nd World War.
The Charter, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. These are words that cannot be allowed to become empty words. They either motivate action or they are useless. And today in Palestine, the Palestinian people has no confidence that these words will protect them. And the Israeli perpetrators have every confidence that these words will not hold them accountable.
Who should be proven right and who should be proven wrong? Where fear should be if the perpetrators had any reason in 75 years to fear the consequences of their actions, What's happening in Gaza today would not have been possible. So we we blame those responsible, the Israelis, The Israeli government that is doing this. The Israeli occupation forces. The Israeli settlers that are doing this.
We are committed to the law. We believe in the law, whoever the perpetrators, whoever the victims. We committed ourselves to that. We look naive at best Until the law protects everyone, until we show that every life is sacred, we don't accept that our people's lives are not sacred. We don't we cannot explain that we're defending the law that is not defending our people.
So with us, with the people who you will hear today, let's uphold the law for everyone's sake, for everyone's future, for justice and for peace. That is the only way forward.
@NazcaMummies - Nazca Mummies
Nazca desert mystery, nova 📐 #nazcalines #ナスカの地上絵 #nazcamummies #宇宙人のミイラ https://t.co/NkR2unSWYC
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Nazca lines in Peru are massive drawings etched into the desert plains, including birds, a monkey, and long lines. These ancient markings have puzzled archaeologists for years, as the Nazca people had no written language. Using modern technology, researchers are now studying the landscape and discovering figures that predate the Nazca civilization. They have also found evidence of thriving civilizations in Peru's southern desert. The origins, purpose, and end of the Nazca lines remain a mystery.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Huge drawings etched into the Peruvian desert plains. Birds, a monkey, and lines that stretch for miles. They're one of the masterpieces traces of alien societies here include. They are the Nazca lines, remnants of a long gone civilization that left its mark quite literally, on the landscape.
Speaker 1: Most of us in Peru, they're sent from these populations.
Speaker 0: But the Nazca people are a mystery. They had no written language, and the desert drawings they left behind have been baffling archaeologists for almost a century. Show What function did they have? It's a question we're still asking ourselves. Now researchers are using 21st century technology that closely study the landscape.
And they're discovering figures made before the Nazca were known to have existed. Who lived here before the Nazca.
Speaker 2: It's a mythological being. Look here. Wow.
Speaker 0: Archaeologists are trying to piece together more than a 1000 years of history and have found evidence of thriving civilizations in Peru's southern desert.
Speaker 2: It is the largest adobe ceremonial center in the whole world.
Speaker 0: Show. How did the Nazca Lines start? What did they mean? Show and why did they end? Nosgka Desert Mystery.
@ElTematics - SANACION MAYA
Nuestros respetos al gran Doctor Frank Suarez, por siempre!! @doctormacias
@_Rowlf - Rowlf
Le grand remplacement c'est ça : Londres - Grande Bretagne🇬🇧 https://t.co/4zswn0gPA1
@elzorrotacneno - Ricardo De Spirito Balbuena.
¿VIH? Todos lo que murieron fue por el uso indiscriminado de AZT, una sustancia tóxica en extremo que anulaba el sistema inmune. Fue iatrogenia a escala genocida. No existe ningún vlrus del VIH. https://t.co/6ZQOewvqtx
Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a discussion about immunodeficiency and its causes, clarifying that being homosexual is not the cause. Certain individuals had a toxic lifestyle that accumulated risk factors. The first antiretroviral medication discovered was AZT, which was toxic and initially intended for cancer treatment. It was later proposed for AIDS patients. People who were treated with AZT between 1985 and 1996 all died. Many individuals have died as a result of taking medication. The conversation highlights the high mortality rate associated with AZT treatment. The analogy of giving indefinite chemotherapy to a person is used to illustrate the negative consequences.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Claro que existe la inmunodeficiencia, por supuesto, y muchas veces por multitud de causas que confluyen. Tú antes decías los homosexuales, no es porque sean homosexuales, por supuesto, naturalmente que no. Es porque un cierto grupo, un cierto sector, Tuvieron una vida muy disparatada y muy tóxica, no es por el hecho de su homosexualidad. Esa vida acumulaba toda una serie de Factores
Speaker 1: de riesgo.
Speaker 2: La el primer medicamento antirretroviral que ellos descubrieron es la AZT, o ácido timidina, Que es un medicamento muy tóxico que se descubre en mil novecientos sesenta y cinco en los Estados Unidos como un quimioterapéutico para destruir Células cancerosas, y la Oficina de Drogas y Alimentos de los Estados Unidos nunca aprobó el AZT para usar en humanos debido a su toxicidad. Sin embargo, en mil novecientos ochenta y seis ochenta y siete, la doctora Margaret Fisher en Miami, el doctor Borderlin en California y otros Los investigadores sacan de nuevo el AZT de donde está aguardado y lo proponen para ese veneno, porque se sabía que era un veneno Para el tratamiento de las personas con sida.
Speaker 3: Yo cuando entré en prisión, allí a todos los drogadictos, todos los que entraban con antecedentes de droga, que era el noventa por ciento, Inmediatamente te metían en la dinámica de la analítica y, a partir de ahí, consulta médica y Te ofrecían el retrobid, que era lo que había allí, en el noventa y uno, año noventa y uno.
Speaker 4: Porque a todo esto hay que decirlo, El AZket, que se estuvo usando durante años, no dejó sobrevivientes, prácticamente no dejó sobrevivientes.
Speaker 3: Retrovir de vuelco, que me acuerdo del dibujito vuelco, de la vuelco. Entonces, fue cuando conocí la palabra vuelco.
Speaker 0: Era quimioterapia por para El cáncer, y así lo sacó el laboratorio Burrus Welcome. Entonces, se consideró, no se le dio la autorización, porque era súper tóxico. Cualquier quimioterapia para el cáncer, todo el mundo que es tóxica. El sistema inmunitario se va a la porra, los glóbulos rojos se van a la porra y tienes anemia, la mucosa intestinal se destruye, etcétera, etcétera.
Speaker 3: Yo conozco a mucha gente que ha muerto a consecuencia de de haber tomado medicación.
Speaker 2: Y todas las personas que fueron tratadas con AZT desde mil novecientos Ochenta y cinco, ochenta y seis, hasta el noventa y seis, todas murieron. Este es un la muerte hiatrogénica, o sea, la muerte causada por la medicina más grave la historia de
Speaker 5: la medicina.
Speaker 1: Y, bueno, así Y mucha gente que lo tomaron, pues de toda esta gente, que era una amiga mía, los otros son todo muertos.
Speaker 5: Yo creo que en el año noventa y uno, noventa y dos, sí, se fueron como treinta personas de mi entorno Una ZT.
Speaker 4: Imaginemos que a una persona le demos quimioterapia del cáncer de forma indefinida. ¿Qué va a pasar con esta persona?
@IvaMasson - Iva Masson
Pr Philippe Even critique l'industrie pharmaceutique et la corruption médicale. En tant que prof émérite et ex-responsable universitaire, ses propos sur #Pfizer font grand bruit. https://t.co/ooSc0gmw6h
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the pharmaceutical industry and its problems. They explain that the industry has struggled to keep up with the complexity of molecular biology and the changing face of capitalism. The speaker highlights how the industry has become powerful and profitable by increasing prices and creating "me too" drugs. They criticize the lack of transparency and the influence of the industry on decision-making at various levels. The speaker emphasizes the need for better pharmacovigilance and a change in medical education to prioritize understanding the dangers of medications. They also address concerns about the industry and the role of doctors.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Le problème de l'industrie pharmaceutique est tout aussi grave. Et tout ce que je vais vous dire, va peut-être vous étonner sur certains points, je puis vous assurer que je suis très en dessous de la vérité. L'histoire de l'industrie pharmaceutique est fascinante. Elle naît en pratique après la dernière guerre mondiale. Jusqu'à dix-neuf-cent-quatre-vingt-cinq, quatre-vingt-dix, elle découvre presque toutes les grandes thérapeutiques dont vous bénéficiez je ne vais pas vous en donner la liste, mais pratiquement tous les grands médicaments ça a commencé avec les antibiotiques, les antihypertenseurs, les diurétiques, les anticoagulants, et caetera, et caetera.
Toutes ces découvertes ont été faites pour l'essentiel par l'industrie pharmaceutique. Et qu'est-ce qui se passe à partir de quatre-vingt-dix Il se passe deux choses, une à laquelle elle ne peut rien, on change d'échelle, on passe à la biologie moléculaire au lieu de se préoccuper du fonctionnement d'une quinzaine d'organes, il faut travailler sur cent mille molécules qui s'entrecroisent dans tous les sens, ça devient d'une complexité très très grande, et ça, l'industrie pharmaceutique qui n'a pas suivi les progrès de la recherche publique, de la recherche universitaire, est paralysée, elle ne sait pas faire. Et puis un deuxième événement à la même date. Le capitalisme change complètement de visage. C'est la grande période de Reagan Thatcher, le capitalisme était un capitalisme entrepreneurial qui cherchait l'innovation, qui cherchait de nouveaux produits, qui investissaient pour ça, c'est fini.
Aujourd'hui, c'est des grands fonds d'investissement spéculatifs qui cherchent à gagner de l'argent et gagner de l'argent tout de suite, très vite, l'année prochaine. Quand on recrute un PDG d'une société pharmaceutique, il est tenu de faire vingt pour cent de bénéfices dans l'année ou sinon il gicle. Or découvrir un médicament, c'est dix, douze, quinze ans. C'est complètement antinomique avec cette nouvelle façon de travailler du capitalisme. Alors un objectif très difficile cent mille molécules devant soi, l'obligation d'avoir des résultats dès l'année qui suit, impossible de continuer les recherches.
Et les centres de recherche commencent par se déqualifier puis disparaître puis être fermés et aujourd'hui on enferme cinq ou dix par an, il y en aura bientôt plus. Mais alors comment l'industrie pharmaceutique est-elle devenue la plus puissante de toutes les industries mondiales, à égalité avec les banques et les assurances d'une part, pour être en faillite les états les les renflluent quand elles sont,
Speaker 1: quand elles vont mal. Alors on ne peut pas
Speaker 0: plaire enfin je. À égalité aussi il est vrai depuis deux ans ou trois ans, avec l'informatique, tout le monde sait le succès d'Apple, lors de la boursière, et caetera. Bon, elle est juste à ce niveau-là, devant l'agroalimentaire et alors perte de vue, vous trouvez les industries mécaniques, l'automobile, le mining, la grande distribution, enfin tout ça, c'est c'est enfin tout ça c'est c'est c'est zéro pour vous donner une idée, une seule des dix grandes firmes, une seule, ça représente trois fois Boeing, cette fois EADS, autant que la totalité de toutes les entreprises de génie électrique dans le monde, une seule firme pharmaceutique. Ça veut dire un chiffre d'affaires qui tourne autour de huit-cent milliards de dollars par an, et des bénéfices autour de quatre-vingt, quatre-vingt-dix milliards de dollars par an. Cette industrie comme l'ont souligné, c'est pas moi qui le dit, les rapports à l'organisation des nations unies, le rapport de collyre à la chambre des communes, les rapports au sénat américain, tous disent la même chose, elle est infiltrée absolument partout, à tous les niveaux décisionnels, internationaux d'abord, par exemple à l'OMS, ou nationaux, au niveau des gouvernements, des parlements, des grandes administrations et naturellement malheureusement pour nous et on doit battre notre au sein d'une part de la communauté universitaire, souvent naïvement d'abord d'ailleurs au départ n'a pas vu le danger et s'est laissé complètement, je ne peux pas dire acheter.
Le mot serait trop fort une pour quelques-uns. Mais c'est laissé placer dans un état de connivence de fait avec l'industrie. Ça, c'est la méthode. Mais qu'est-ce qu'elle peut vendre pour gagner autant d'argent Ce n'était pas facile. Alors la première chose ça a été d'augmenter les prix, à partir de quatre-vingt-dix, les prix double, triple quadruple.
Et c'est l'industrie qui impose les prix. Elle les impose aux États-Unis, elle a le droit, c'est légal, elle décide du prix. Que voulez-vous que fassent les autres pays en particulier les européens, ils sont obligés de suivre. À quelques dix, quinze pour cent près, l'Europe accepte le même prix. Ça a été la première action.
La la deuxième façon, ça a été d'inventer ce qu'on a appelé, le mot passe toujours mal en France, les me too. C'est-à-dire qu'on a une grande molécule originale, elle marche bien, le brevet s'éteint au bout de huit ou dix ans, elle est génériqueée, elle ne rapporte plus rien. Alors l'industriel fabrique la même molécule avec comme tu l'as dit tout à l'heure à propos du des des dérivés du médiateur avec un chapeau vert, un chapeau rouge un méthyle ici, influent là bon, par exemple en chimie, mais disons que c'est bête comme chou. Donc elle refait la même molécule avec le même effet, mais un nouveau brevet et c'est reparti pour huit et puis au bout de huit ans encore, on est à seize ans, on recommence une troisième fois, voire une quatrième fois. Mais ça, c'est ce qui se passe avec une firme, toutes ces firmes, elles sont en rivalité naturellement.
Donc quand une d'entre elles met sur le marché un très grand médicament, aussitôt l'autre va fabriquer aussi un me too, et on se retrouve ainsi sur les grands marchés, hypertension artérielle par exemple. Il y a en France actuellement cinq molécules originales pour traiter excellente, pour traiter l'hypertension artérielle. Ça aboutit sur le marché à deux-cents molécules commercialisées et remboursées, toutes, absolument ils torpillent sans aucune différence. Et toutes avec des prix, qui croissent avec le temps, parce que comme elle sort dix ans ou quinze ans après, l'inflation a joué, donc il est légitime de leur donner un peu plus et on se trouve dans la situation exceptionnelle, ou la copie de la Joconde est plus chère que la Joconde elle-même. C'est c'est absolument stupéfiant comme mécanique.
Alors naturellement les prix sont décidés par un truc qui s'appelle le comité économique des produits de santé qui d'ailleurs pratiquement est obligé de suivre les prix américains que je vous ai dit tout à l'heure, qui décide aussi des remboursements avec bon soixante-quinze pour cent des médicaments français sont encore remboursés, il y en a quarante pour cent qui le mériteraient, les autres ne devraient pas. Donc c'est la dépense en France de trente-sept milliards d'euros tous les ans, trente-sept milliards d'euros de médicaments, c'est-à-dire un virgule cinq, un virgule huit fois plus que tous les pays qui nous entourent, qui se portent aussi bien que nous, qui vivent aussi longtemps, qui n'ont pas plus de qu'ils sont aussi bien traités. On est donc devant une situation scandaleuse, d'un gaspillage qu'on peut chiffrer à quinze milliards d'euros, c'est-à-dire une fois et demie le déficit de la caisse d'assurance maladie. Voilà la situation financière dans laquelle on se trouve. Il me reste une minute deux minutes.
Trente secondes. Mais
Speaker 2: en fait ce qu'il faut ce qu'il faut ce qu'il faut à ce stade Quebec, je crois que le, parce que là c'est ce que vous avez évoqué c'est c'est de façon très brillante, c'est le c'est la logique industriel et commercial de la dossier pharmaceutique et les raisons de son extraordinaire efficacité, là, il faut quand même faire le lien avec l'affaire du médiateur, c'est-à-dire où est à partir de où est le
Speaker 0: Alors je demande vingt secondes, il n'y a pas besoin de plus de vingt secondes. Tout est faux, d'autres comme John Yuanie disent disent quatre-vingt-dix pour cent. Moi je simplifie. Tout est faux dans ce qui est publié sur les médicaments. Et quand c'est vrai, la plupart des médecins ne se donnent pas la peine de lire les articles dans le détail, ils regarde que les titres et les conclusions qui sont toujours enchanteurs et n'ont rien à voir avec les résultats réels de ces articles.
Je caricature un peu, mais je peux vous dire que c'est vrai de la plupart des très grosses molécules, premièrement, que comme celle sur lequel j'ai beaucoup travaillé récemment comme les statines, il n'y a pas un mot de, mais pas un mot de vrai, ça ne dit, il n'y a pas un seul article qui soutienne réellement et scientifiquement, ce qui est affirmé et qui conduit pour les statines à deux milliards d'euros de dépenses annuelles, c'est-à-dire cent-vingt-mille SMIC bruts.
Speaker 3: C'est clair, Le système de déclaration des événements secondaires national qui est ancien doit être remis en question pour sa compréhension. Et Irène c'était bon voilà ici c'est clair puisqu'il n'est pas compréhensible Et les prises de désir et donc c'est au moment où on commence à déclarer des morts, de s'apercevoir qu'il y en a plus ou des événements secondaires. Donc il faut être transparent. Ensuite c'est qui déclare et à qui. Quand même.
Donc là il faut que les déclarations soient faites pour qu'elles soient suivies des faits et quand elles sont faites il faut qu'elles soient rendues publiques de façon transparente et au fil de l'eau à ce stade là c'est tout ce que
Speaker 2: je peux
Speaker 0: dire mais
Speaker 3: je vais laisser Non mais
Speaker 1: je vais laisser On
Speaker 3: a une crise
Speaker 1: Déclaration.
Speaker 3: De déclaration.
Speaker 1: Comment faire effectivement pour que moi je je je je crois que je disais, J'interromps un traitement pour effet indésirable à peu près tous les quinze jours. C'est-à-dire que Dans ma
Speaker 4: consultation en
Speaker 1: pneumologie, je vois des effets sur le poumon qui correspondent à des effets indésirables, pas tous mortels ni très graves, Mais enfin oui, qui qui voilà et qui qui m'oblige à interrompre le traitement et je ne déclare pas ses effets indésirables. Parce que ça va être tout un bazar.
Speaker 0: Oui, je voudrais donner un exemple, parce que c'est vraiment l'avenir. En deux mille, un groupe de mille 6 cent quatre-vingt-quatre médecins écossais autour d'Aberdeen décide de suivre pendant des années, les malades qu'ils ont mis à la pilule. Ils ont suivi je crois, mes chiffres ne sont pas absolument sur un million deux cent mille femmes pendant en moyenne cinq à ou huit ans, et ce sont ces médecins généralistes, qui ont cherché, noté, classifié, travaillé ensemble est réalisé une vraie pharmacovigilance active, et aujourd'hui, les connaissances qu'on a sur les risques de la pilule, ils viennent très largement de ce premier essai qui était ensuite confirmé par des essais classiques. C'est ça qu'il faut qu'on obtienne, que les jeunes médecins qui s'installent savent que c'est leur mission de suivre, de se rencontrer entre eux, de tous les mois, tous les trois mois, de se raconter ce qu'ils ont vu, de mettre sur pied des programmes de travail parce que les effets secondaires, il y a ceux qui sont faciles, vous prenez des anticoagulants, vous saigner, tout le monde s'y attend, ce n'est pas un problème. Mais les effets, non mais c'est un problème médical, mais ce n'est pas un problème pour les reconnaître.
Tandis que certains effets secondaires sont tellement atypiques ou tellement rares, qui sont très difficiles à être considérés comme liés aux médicaments, ils sont surprenants, les phlébites et les ampoly pulmonaires même si après on a trouvé les explications biologiques, ce n'était pas prévisible dès le premier jour. Les effets secondaires les plus intéressants à découvrir, à étudier pour apporter quelque chose aux malades, c'est ceux qu'on ne connaît pas aujourd'hui et surtout ceux qui relèvent de l'association de deux, trois, quatre, cinq, huit, vingt-huit molécules en même temps. Voilà, tant que les médecins ne feront pas ça sur le terrain, on n'y arrivera pas, ni nous, ni les autres. C'est à l'école qu'il faut apprendre les principes de la santé, de l'alimentation, du sport, le faire comprendre le plus tôt possible aux enfants et on peut le faire de façon très amusante et efficace. C'est ensuite dans les facultés de médecine de changer complètement l'orientation.
Pendant 6 ans, ils apprennent des sciences fondamentales qui sont périmées et qu'ils oublient d'ailleurs, ils apprennent les moyens diagnostics, n'importe quelle idiote aujourd'hui, il y a un diagnostic, alors le plus malin deux minutes, le plus maladroit il mettra une semaine parce qu'il y a beaucoup d'examens qui vont venir corriger ses idées initiales, le diagnostic ce n'est pas un problème. Le problème, c'est le choix des médicaments, de la dose, de la durée, des médicaments qu'on peut associer, et c'est prendre conscience du danger des médicaments. J'ai entendu quelques gynécologues parfumés et pommatés du seizième arrondissement expliquer à la télévision que c'est des accidents très rares, une fois sur dix mille, une fois sur dix mille, il y a huit millions de femmes qui en prennent, ça fait combien d'accidents mortels les accidents graves sont en effet des accidents rares, mais il y a tellement de gens qui prennent de médicaments qu'à la fin de l'année ça fait cent morts, deux cents morts, trois cents morts, mort pour le médiateur putain de perlimpinpin, tout est à changer dans la prise de conscience de ce qu'est un médicament dès les études médicales, alors après il y a encore la formation continue, bon je ne vais pas vous faire perdre de temps, il n'y en a pas, c'est l'industrie pharmaceutique.
Speaker 1: L'industrie surtout qui l'a, qui l'a, qui saisit, qui Très rapidement de la formation et de la déformation professionnelle dès les premières années à la faculté.
Speaker 2: Alors est-ce que peut-être passer la parole à la salle, enfin s'il y a des questions sinon nous allons continuer à de viser tranquillement entre nous, mais ce serait peut-être bien que Les projecteurs font que je ne vois quasiment pas la salle, c'est peut-être mes yeux qui sont en train de, peut-être qu'il faut un médicament. Une petite question alors.
Speaker 4: Puisque c'est la question de la fin, je voudrais poser la question suivante à vous écouter peut-être un peu moins monsieur Maranxi Qui peut pondérer dans ces paroles, faut-il jeter le bébé avec l'eau du bain Est-ce qu'il faut considérer qu'en France, malgré les progrès de santé publique malgré le fait que finalement les Français comme une tous avons accès aux soins et à un niveau Un niveau de soins rarement égalé dans les autres pays et de façon uniforme sur toute la population. Faut-il quand même continuer À vous entendre tout est bon à jeter, qu'il faut mettre une bombe dans la mare sous prétexte qu'il y a des mauvais canards dans la mare Comme Servier à ne pas en douter et vraiment certainement à faire pâlir toute l'industrie pharmaceutique, qu'un certain nombre de médecins ne sont certes pas bien formés On ne font pas de formation continue pour amener de bons traitements et ne doit-on pas plutôt penser que quatre-vingts pour cent Des gens qui travaillent à traiter des patients au quotidien passent douze, quinze, quatorze heures ou seize heures par jour À recevoir les patients le font du mieux qu'ils peuvent avec la volonté de se tenir au courant, de donner le meilleur traitement à la meilleure personne.
Alors n'ont pas été formés à la sociologie, ils ne font pas beaucoup d'heures de thérapeutique. Mais est-ce qu'on peut continuer à avoir confiance dans nos médecins. Est-ce qu'on peut se dire qu'il faut que l'industrie pharmaceutique continue à exister parce que demain on a besoin encore de trouver des solutions A des pathologies qui n'ont pas de traitement aujourd'hui or c'est pas l'état qui versera ce qu'il faut pour développer des molécules qui mettent comme vous l'avez dit dix ans à être développées. Est-ce qu'il faut aussi douter de nos instances et penser que malgré les progrès que que les instances font d'année en année pour essayer de réglementer Le marché du médicament, on est voilà tout est quand même très bon à acheter et il n'y a plus qu'à poser une bombe en espérant que les choses se reconstruisent mieux. Très inquiète en tant que patiente à vous écouter.
On est là dans une assemblée grand public. C'est très inquiétant, les médias s'en emparent et Personnellement je trouve qu'il y a de très mauvais messages qui sont diffusés à la population du fait de cette généralisation.
Speaker 2: Vous ne vous êtes pas présenté madame.
Speaker 4: Isabelle Harkmann, voilà, je travaille dans l'industrie pharmaceutique.
Speaker 1: Ça que j'allais vous demander.
Speaker 4: Non mais.
Speaker 1: Quel était votre rôle au syndicat pharmaceutique Parce que vous venez de Du
Speaker 4: résultat, il y a des informations,
Speaker 1: toute la désinformation qui aboutit situation, enfin Non,
Speaker 4: mais vous ne pouvez pas généraliser, vous ne pouvez pas généraliser.
Speaker 1: C'est l'instrument du formulaire parce qu'au fur et à mesure que votre argumentaire s'est déroulé, Voilà, nous avons compris effectivement. Non, mais
Speaker 4: je parle aussi des médecins. Pourquoi pourquoi aimez-vous les médecins de ne pas faire bien leur Je
Speaker 1: suis médecin, donc je ne suis finalement pas si mal placée pour parler également de mes collègues. Je ne m'exclus pas de ces critiques loin de là. Donc ça n'a absolument rien à voir avec C'était
Speaker 0: très bien chanté. Il manquait que peut-être un violon, un haut bois et ça aurait été tout à fait parfait. Je trouve qu'il
Speaker 3: y a une jolie illustration là, médecin, médicaments méfiance, c'est légitime.
@nogulagsagain - steven
UK 2023 Don’t let Labor do this to Australia. Press ❤️ if you want an immediate end to Muslim migration. https://t.co/1g8TSKOIhK
@nogulagsagain - steven
This is London now. This is Labor’s plan for Australia. Press ❤️ if you had enough. https://t.co/x2RHvomALJ
@LEGENERAL_OFF - LE GÉNÉRAL 💎
Excellent Pr Philippe Even sur le business de l'industrie pharmaceutique ses méthodes douteuses et la corruption médicale, Pr Even est prof émérite & ancien vice président de l'université Paris-V, ancien doyen de la fac de médecine Necker & président de l'institut Necker #Pfizer https://t.co/oQhhqdSwzm
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the pharmaceutical industry and its problems. They explain that the industry has struggled to keep up with advancements in molecular biology and the changing face of capitalism. The speaker highlights how the industry has become powerful and profitable by increasing drug prices and creating "me too" drugs with slight variations to extend patents. They criticize the lack of transparency and the influence of the pharmaceutical industry on decision-making at international and national levels. The speaker emphasizes the need for better pharmacovigilance and the importance of educating doctors about the risks and benefits of medications. They also mention the need for better reporting and understanding of adverse effects. The speaker concludes by stating that changes are needed in medical education and the way medications are developed and prescribed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Le problème de l'industrie pharmaceutique est tout aussi grave. Et tout ce que je vais vous dire va peut-être vous étonner, sur certains points, je puis vous assurer que je suis très en dessous de la vérité. L'histoire de l'industrie pharmaceutique est fascinante. Elle naît en pratique après la dernière guerre mondiale. Jusqu'à dix-neuf-cent-quatre-vingt-cinq, quatre-vingt-dix, elle découvre presque toutes les grandes thérapeutiques dont vous bénéficiez aujourd'hui.
Je ne vais pas vous en donner la liste, mais pratiquement tous les grands médicaments ça a commencé avec les antibiotiques, les antihypertenseurs, les diurétiques, les anticoagulants et caetera et caetera. Toutes ces découvertes ont été faites pour l'essentiel par l'industrie pharmaceutique. Et qu'est-ce qui se passe à partir de quatre-vingt-dix il se passe deux choses. Une à laquelle elle ne peut rien, on change d'échelle, on passe à la biologie moléculaire, au lieu de se préoccuper du fonctionnement d'une quinzaine d'organes, il faut travailler sur cent mille molécules qui s'entrecroisent dans tous les sens, ça devient d'une complexité très très grande et ça, l'industrie pharmaceutique qui n'a pas suivi les progrès de la, de la recherche publique, de la recherche universitaire, est paralysée, elle ne sait pas faire. Et puis un deuxième événement à la même date.
Le capitalisme change complètement de visage. C'est la grande période de Reagan Thatcher, le capitalisme était un capitalisme entrepreneurial, qui cherchait l'innovation, qui cherchait de nouveaux produits, qui investissaient pour ça, c'est fini. Aujourd'hui, c'est des grands fonds d'investissement spéculatifs, qui cherchent à gagner de l'argent et gagner de l'argent tout de suite, très vite, l'année prochaine. Quand on recrute un PDG d'une société pharmaceutique, il est tenu de faire vingt pour cent de bénéfices dans l'année ou sinon il gicle. Or découvrir un médicament, c'est dix, douze, quinze ans.
C'est complètement antinomique avec cette nouvelle façon de travailler du capitalisme. Alors, un objectif très difficile cent mille molécules devant soi, l'obligation d'avoir des résultats dès l'année qui suit, impossible de continuer les recherches. Et les centres de recherche commencent par se déqualifier, puis disparaître, puis être fermé, et aujourd'hui, on enferme cinq ou dix par an, il n'y en aura bientôt plus. Mais alors comment l'industrie pharmaceutique est-elle devenue la plus puissante de toutes les industries mondiales, à égalité avec les banques et les assurances d'une part, ne peuvent pas être en faillite, les états les les renflluent quand elles sont, quand elles vont mal. À égalité aussi il est vrai depuis deux ans ou trois ans, avec l'informatique, tout le monde sait le succès d'Apple en valeur boursière et caetera.
Elle est juste à ce niveau-là, devant l'agroalimentaire et alors à perte de vue, vous trouvez les industries mécaniques, l'automobile, le mining, la grande distribution, enfin tout ça c'est c'est c'est zéro pour vous donner une idée, une seule des dix grandes firmes, une seule, ça représente trois fois Boeing, sept fois EADS, autant que la totalité de toutes les entreprises de génie électrique dans le monde, une seule firme pharmaceutique. Ça veut dire un chiffre d'affaires qui tourne autour de huit-cent milliards de dollars par an, et des bénéfices autour de quatre-vingt, quatre-vingt-dix milliards de dollars par an. Cette industrie comme l'ont souligné, c'est pas moi qui le dit, les rapports à l'organisation des nations unies, le rapport de collyre à la chambre des communes, les rapports au sénat américain, tous disent la même chose, elle est infiltré absolument partout, à tous les niveaux décisionnels, internationaux d'abord, par exemple à l'OMS, ou nationaux, au niveau des gouvernements, des parlements, des grandes administrations et naturellement malheureusement pour nous et on doit battre d'autres au sein d'une part de la communauté universitaire, qui souvent naïvement d'abord d'ailleurs au départ, n'a pas vu le danger et s'est laissé complètement, je ne peux pas dire acheter.
Le mot serait trop fort une nouveau break pour quelques-uns. Mais c'est laissé placer dans un état de connivence de fait avec l'industrie. Ça, c'est la méthode. Mais qu'est-ce qu'elle peut vendre pour gagner autant d'argent Ce n'était pas facile. Alors la première chose ça a été d'augmenter les prix à partir de quatre-vingt-dix, les prix doublent, triples, et c'est l'industrie qui impose les prix.
Elle les impose aux États-Unis, elle a le droit, c'est légal, elle décide du prix. Que voulez-vous que fassent les autres pays en particulier les européens, ils sont obligés de suivre. À quelques dix, quinze pour cent près, l'Europe accepte le même prix. Ça a été la première action. La la deuxième façon, ça a été d'inventer ce qu'on a appelé, le mot passe toujours mal en France, les me too.
C'est-à-dire qu'on a une grande molécule originale, elle marche bien, le brevet s'éteint au bout de huit ou dix ans, elle est génériqueée, elle ne rapporte plus rien. Alors l'industriel fabrique la même molécule avec comme tu l'as dit tout à l'heure à propos des des des dérivés du médiateur, avec un chapeau vert, un chapeau rouge, un méthyle ici, un fluor là bon, par exemple pas de chimie, mais disons que c'est bête comme chou. Donc elle refait la même molécule avec le même effet, mais un nouveau brevet et c'est reparti pour huit et puis au bout de huit ans encore, on est à seize ans, et bien on recommence une troisième fois, voire une quatrième fois. Mais ça, c'est ce qui se passe avec une firme, toutes ces firmes, elles sont en rivalité naturellement. Donc quand une d'entre elles met sur le marché un très grand médicament, aussitôt l'autre va fabriquer aussi un MeToo et on se retrouve ainsi sur les grands marchés, hypertension artérielle par exemple.
Il y a en France actuellement cinq molécules originales pour traiter excellentes, pour traiter l'hypertension artérielle. Ça aboutit sur le marché, a deux-cents molécules commercialisées et remboursées, toutes, absolument identiques, sans aucune différence. Et toutes avec des prix, qui croise avec le temps, parce que comme elle sort dix ans ou quinze ans après, l'inflation a joué, donc il est légitime de leur donner un peu plus et on se trouve dans la situation exceptionnel, où la copie de la Joconde est plus chère que la Joconde elle-même. C'est c'est absolument stupéfiant comme mécanique. Naturellement les prix sont décidés par un truc qui s'appelle le comité économique des produits de santé qui d'ailleurs pratiquement est obligé de suivre les prix américains que je l'ai dit tout à l'heure, qui décide aussi des remboursements avec soixante-quinze pour cent des médicaments français sont encore remboursés, il y en a quarante pour cent qui le mériteraient, les autres ne devraient pas.
Donc c'est, c'est la dépense en France de trente-sept milliards d'euros tous les ans, trente-sept milliards d'euros de médicaments, c'est-à-dire un virgule cinq, un virgule huit fois plus que tous les pays qui nous entourent, qui se porte aussi bien que nous, qui vivent aussi longtemps, qui n'ont pas plus de maladies, qui sont aussi bien traitées. On est donc devant une situation scandaleuse, d'un gaspillage compulsifré à quinze milliards d'euros, c'est-à-dire une fois et demie le déficit de la caisse d'assurance maladie. Voilà la situation financière dans laquelle on se trouve. Il me reste une minute deux minutes.
Speaker 1: Trente trente secondes. Mais en fait ce qu'il faut ce qu'il faut ce qu'il faut À ce stade, Philippe Pueveig, je crois que parce que là, c'est ce que vous avez évoqué, c'est c'est de façon très brillante, c'est le c'est la logique industriel et commercial de la dossier pharmaceutique et les raisons de son extraordinaire efficacité, là, il faut quand même faire le lien avec l'affaire du médiateur, c'est-à-dire où est à partir de, où est le
Speaker 0: Alors je te demande vingt secondes, il n'y a pas besoin de plus de vingt secondes. Tout est faux, d'autres comme John Yuanie dix dix, quatre-vingt-dix pour cent. Moi je simplifie. Tout est faux dans ce qui est publié sur les médicaments. Et quand c'est vrai, la plupart des médecins ne se donnent pas la peine de lire les articles caricature un peu, mais je peux vous dire que c'est vrai de la plupart des très grosses molécules, premièrement, que comme celle sur lequel j'ai beaucoup travaillé récemment comme les statines, voilà, il n'y a pas un mot de, mais pas un mot de vrai, ça ne dit, il n'y a pas un seul article qui soutienne réellement et scientifiquement, ce qui est affirmé et qui conduit pour les statines à deux milliards d'euros de dépenses annuelles, c'est-à-dire cent-vingt-mille SMIC bruts.
Speaker 2: C'est clair, Le système de déclaration des événements secondaires national qui est ancien doit être remis en question pour sa compréhension. Et Irène c'était bon voilà c'est clair puisqu'il n'est pas compréhensible et les prises de désir. Et donc c'est au moment où on commence à déclarer des morts, de s'apercevoir qu'il y a un cas n'a plus ou des événements secondaires. Il faut être transparent. Ensuite c'est qui déclare et à qui Quand même.
Donc là il faut que les déclarations soient faites Pour qu'elles soient suivies des faits et quand elles sont faites, il faut qu'elles soient rendues publiques et de façon transparente et au fil de l'eau. À ce stade là c'est tout ce que je peux dire et je vais laisser y ajouter le temps.
Speaker 3: Non juste on
Speaker 2: a une crise Déclaration. De déclaration.
Speaker 3: Comment faire effectivement pour que moi je je je crois que je disais, J'interromps un traitement pour effet indésirable à peu près tous les quinze jours. C'est-à-dire que Dans ma consultation en pneumologie, je vois des effets sur le poumon qui correspondent à des effets indésirables, pas tous mortels ni très graves, mais oui Voilà, et qui qui m'oblige à interrompre le traitement et je ne déclare pas ses effets indésirables. Parce que ça va être tout un bazar.
Speaker 0: Oui, je voudrais donner un exemple, parce que c'est vraiment l'avenir. En deux mille, un groupe de mille 6 cent quatre-vingt-quatre médecins écossais autour de la Berdine décide de suivre pendant des années, les malades qu'ils ont mis à la pilule. Ils ont suivi je crois, mes chiffres ne sont pas absolument sûrs, un million deux cent mille femmes pendant en moyenne cinq à 6 ou huit ans. Et ce sont ces médecins généralistes qui ont cherché, noté, classifié, travaillé ensemble est réalisé une vraie pharmacovigilance active, et aujourd'hui, les connaissances qu'on a sur les risques de la pilule, ils viennent très largement de ce premier essai qui était ensuite confirmé par des essais classiques. C'est ça qu'il faut qu'on obtienne, que les jeunes médecins qui s'installent savent que c'est leur mission de suivre, de se rencontrer entre eux, tous les mois, tous les trois mois, de se raconter ce qu'ils ont vu, de de mettre sur pied des programme de travail parce que les effets secondaires, il y a ceux qui sont faciles, vous prenez des anticoagulants, vous saignez tout le monde s'y attend, ce n'est pas un problème.
Mais les effets, non, mais c'est un problème médical, mais ce n'est pas un problème pour les reconnaître. Tandis que certains effets secondaires sont tellement atypiques ou tellement rares, qui sont très difficiles à être considérés comme liés aux médicaments, ils sont surprenants, les les les phlébites et les ampoly pulmonaires même si après on a trouvé les explications biologiques, ce n'était pas prévisible dès le premier jour. Les effets secondaires les plus intéressants à découvrir, à étudier pour apporter quelque chose aux malades, c'est ceux qu'on ne connaît pas aujourd'hui et surtout ceux qui relèvent de l'association de deux, trois, quatre, cinq, huit, vingt-huit molécules en même temps. Voilà, tant que les médecins ne feront pas ça sur le terrain, on n'y arrivera pas, ni nous ni les autres. C'est à l'école qu'il faut apprendre les principes de la santé, de l'alimentation, du sport, le faire comprendre le plus tôt possible aux enfants.
Et on peut le faire de façon très amusante et efficace, c'est ensuite dans les facultés de médecine de changer complètement l'orientation. Pendant 6 ans, ils apprennent des sciences fondamentales qui sont vite périmées et qu'ils oublient d'ailleurs, ils apprennent les moyens diagnostics, n'importe quelle l'idiot aujourd'hui fait un diagnostic, alors le plus malin en deux minutes, le plus maladroit il mettra une semaine parce qu'il y a beaucoup d'examens qui vont venir corriger ces idées initiales, diagnostic ce n'est pas un problème, le problème, c'est le choix du médicament, de la dose, de la durée, des médicaments qu'on peut associer et c'est prendre conscience du danger des médicaments. J'ai entendu quelques gynécologues parfumés et pamatés du seizième arrondissement à la télévision, que c'est des accidents très rares, une fois sur dix mille, une fois sur dix mille, il y a huit millions de femmes qui en prennent Ça fait combien d'accidents mortels Les accidents graves sont en effet des accidents rares, mais il y a tellement de gens qui prennent de médicaments qu'à la fin de l'année, ça fait cent morts, deux cents morts, trois cents morts, treize cents morts pour le médiateur de de perlimpinpin. Tout est à changer dans la prise de conscience de ce qu'est un médicament dès les études médicales.
Alors après il y a encore la formation continue, bon je ne vais pas vous perte de temps, il n'y en a pas, c'est l'industrie pharmaceutique.
Speaker 3: L'industrie surtout qui la, qui la, qui saisit, qui se situe très rapidement de la formation et de la déformation professionnelle dès les premières années à la faculté.
Speaker 1: Alors est-ce que peut-être passer la parole à la salle, enfin s'il y a des questions sinon nous allons de viser tranquillement entre nous, mais ce serait peut-être bien que je ne les projecteurs font que je ne vois quasiment pas la salle, c'est peut-être mes yeux qui sont en train de ce qu'il faut aux médicaments, une petite question
Speaker 4: alors. Puisque c'est la question de la fin, je voudrais poser la question suivante À vous écouter, peut-être un peu moins monsieur qui peut pondérer dans ses paroles. Faut-il jeter le bébé avec l'eau du bain Est-ce qu'il faut considérer qu'en France, malgré les progrès de santé publique, malgré le fait que finalement les Français comme une tous avons accès Aux soins et à un niveau, un niveau de soins rarement égalé dans les autres pays et de façon uniforme sur toute la population. Quand même continuer à penser que à vous entendre tout est bon à jeter, qu'il faut mettre une bombe dans la mare sous prétexte qu'il y a Des mauvais canards dans la mare comme Servier à ne pas en douter et vraiment certainement à faire pâlir toute l'industrie pharmaceutique, Un certain nombre de médecins ne sont certes pas bien formés ou ne font pas de formation continue pour amener de bons traitements. Et ne doit-on pas plutôt penser que quatre-vingts pour cent des gens qui travaillent à traiter les patients au quotidien Passe douze, quinze, quatorze heures ou seize heures par jour à recevoir les patients le font du mieux qu'ils peuvent Avec la volonté de se tenir au courant, de donner le meilleur traitement à la meilleure personne.
Alors sept, ils n'ont pas été formés à la sociologie. Ils ne font pas beaucoup d'heures de thérapeutique, mais est-ce qu'on peut continuer à avoir confiance dans nos médecins Est-ce qu'on peut se dire qu'il faut que l'industrie pharmaceutique continue à exister Parce que demain on a besoin encore de trouver des solutions à des pathologies qui n'ont pas de traitement aujourd'hui or ce n'est pas l'état qui versera ce qu'il faut pour Développer des molécules qui mettent comme vous l'avez dit dix ans à être développées. Est-ce qu'il faut aussi douter de nos instances et penser que Malgré les progrès que que les instances font d'année en année pour essayer de réglementer le marché du médicament, On est voilà, tout est quand même très bon à acheter et il n'y a plus qu'à poser une bombe en espérant que les choses se reconstruisent mieux. Je suis très inquiète en tant que patiente à vous écouter. On est là dans une assemblée grand public, c'est très inquiétant, les médias s'en emparent et personnellement je trouve qu'il y a de mauvais messages qui sont diffusés à la population du fait de cette généralisation.
Speaker 1: Vous ne vous êtes pas présenté madame.
Speaker 4: Voilà, je travaille dans l'industrie pharmaceutique.
Speaker 3: C'était ça que j'allais vous demander.
Speaker 4: Non mais, mais, c'est-à-dire
Speaker 3: quel était votre rôle au syndicat Parce que vous venez de finir cette démarche. Il y a des informations, toute la désinformation qui aboutit à la situation. Enfin, non,
Speaker 4: mais vous ne pouvez pas généraliser. Vous ne pouvez pas généraliser, c'est
Speaker 3: aussi une situation du transhumiliaire Parce qu'au fur et à mesure que votre argumentaire s'est déroulé, Nous avons compris effectivement.
Speaker 4: Non mais je parle aussi des médecins. Pourquoi pourquoi amusez-vous les médecins de ne pas faire bien leur travail Ils font
Speaker 3: Je suis médecin, donc je ne finalement pas si mal placé pour parler également de mes collègues, je ne m'exclus pas de ces critiques loin de là. Donc ça n'a absolument rien à voir avec C'était
Speaker 0: c'était très bien chanté. Il il manquait que peut-être un violon, un haut bois et ça aurait été tout à fait parfait.
Speaker 1: Je trouve qu'il
Speaker 2: y a une jolie illustration là, médecin, médicament, méfiance, c'est légitime.
@infodescience - Info Science
Au-dessus des nuages, c'est comme un monde de neige #neige https://t.co/wVWzAZmrLa
@travelvideoz - Travel Videos
When the rainbow falls above the clouds ✨ By: girlchill_sunset https://t.co/QNywfU1CVJ
@elzorrotacneno - Ricardo De Spirito Balbuena.
¿Malestares permanentes? Prueba con estos tips. https://t.co/9gvwefV6a0
@DELTA9_DELTA9 - DELTA 9
WHY WOULD THEY DO THIS TO THEMSELVES #stratosphericaerosolinjection #chemtrails #geoengineering #srm #haarp @RealFisheman @GokMedresesiiii @Rebekah81USA @Dervishizir @garfybloom @frankyclarke @JayneJ07 @Gp1ggy1 @RealGeoEngWatch@Chemtrail101@BGatesIsaPyscho @WeatherGirlofLA https://t.co/zxQ2pdzTtN
Video Transcript AI Summary
Chemtrails have been observed in various locations around the world, including England, Switzerland, Paris, Canada, and the United States. The question arises as to why those in power would engage in atmospheric aerosol spraying. However, it is important to view those in power as a cancer that aims to proliferate without regard for the consequences. They have already caused significant damage to the planet through nuclear detonations and power plant accidents like Fukushima and Chernobyl. It is crucial to expose and stop these climate intervention operations to allow the planet to recover from the damage already inflicted. There is nowhere to hide.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm not sure how widely dispersed in the globe are these chemtrails. I can say where I've seen them, and I've seen them over England. I've seen them over Geneva and Switzerland. I've seen them over Paris, and I've seen them all over in North America, Canada and the United States.
Speaker 1: It's an important question. It's a very understandable question in regard to the ongoing atmospheric aerosol spraying operations in our skies when people are first introduced to this issue, it's very difficult to understand why those in power would do this to themselves. But we need to look at those in power as a cancer because that's in fact exactly what they are. Does a cancer intend to kill its host? No.
The cancer intends to proliferate unchecked until the host eventually dies. If we look at what those in power have already done to themselves, the detonation of over 2,400 nuclear bombs that have contaminated the entire planet, the entire web of life, damaging the atmosphere. If we look at nuclear power plants with 4 42 online, 60 more under construction, when we have 1 single power plant at this moment, the Fukushima meltdown, triple nuclear meltdown, no technology to fix it, no wind in sight, a potential extinction Event by itself, we're building 60 more. Chernobyl is not done yet. That sarcophagus is disintegrating.
That will likely resurface as a global issue very soon. So again, we need to look at those in power as a headless, heartless, soulless cancer whose only objective is to proliferate unchecked until absolutely nothing is left. It's imperative we expose and halt the ongoing climate intervention operations so that the planet has the ability to respond on its own to the damage already done. There's no place to hide
@EarthquakeChil1 - InfoSismologic
#Chemtrails 😳 Brasil https://t.co/ESRHNs5cLn
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses surprise and confusion about something, using strong language. They question what it is and express disbelief. The speaker's tone suggests frustration and shock.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: La madre, qué chingados es eso. Válgame la Virgen Santísima, pues, ¿qué se desoncé, tira? ¿Es eso?
@cooltechtipz - Learn Something
Sewing tips. https://t.co/0J14qSCFuK
Video Transcript AI Summary
500 years ago, a sewing method was invented that eliminated the need for tailors. It can be used to shorten sleeves by closing the ends. By sewing the bottom of a hole in jeans with a cross stitch, the stitches become invisible. Unworn socks can be cut and sewn onto a jumper using this invisible stitch to lengthen the sleeves. The method can also be used to fix a loose collar or adjust the waist of pants without leaving any traces. Lastly, a simple and practical bookmark is shown.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 500 years ago, the sells trick. No need to go to the tailor anymore. Even if the jumper sleeves get longer, you don't have to wear sleeves. This sewing method is very practical. Let's sew more and more.
It can be used for any sleeve. If you close the intention at the end, The sleeves will get shorter. Sew the bottom of the hole where the jeans have a hole in the crotch, cross stitch left and right. Sew to the bottom of the hole and pull the thread lightly. The stitches are not visible at all.
Cut off socks that you don't wear And sew them to the jumper with this invisible stitch. And after the sleeves get longer, it will last for 3 years. Don't throw away the big collar either. 1 stitch on top and 1 stitch on the bottom, and gently pull at the end to solve it. What if the pants waist is too big?
I'll teach you how to paint and how to block without leaving any traces. Under sewing, upper sewing, and so on, pull once at the end and the waist will be corrected. For the bottoms, first, open the thread from under the needle. Next, cross the needle left and right and pull the thread. Repeat this to sew the bottoms.
Simple and practical bookmark.
@destapandolose1 - 🌐EL GRAN DESPERTAR🌐
Sistemas de Armas energia dirigida ya no es secreto 👀 https://t.co/n4V607978c
Video Transcript AI Summary
At the South Pole Station, there are advanced technologies that most people are unaware of. One such technology is the directed energy weapon system, which is not commonly known. Additionally, the ice cube neutrino detector is not just a listening device, but it is actually the largest directed energy weapon system in the world. These technologies are worth exploring and understanding.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That there are technologies at the South Pole Station that people can't even consider that exist on this planet. Like what? Directed energy weapon systems is something that people need to get into their vocabulary fast. The ice cube neutrino detector is not simply a passive listening device as presented. It's the world's largest directed energy weapon system.
reSee.it AI Summary
The Panier, Marseille's oldest neighborhood, holds a rich cultural heritage. It was founded by the Greeks in 600 BC, with Lenche Square serving as their agora and Moulins Square as the acropolis dedicated to Athena. Today, the area showcases a blend of street art and historic monuments. In the coming weeks, I will delve into the city's history, including Corsican emigration, Italian immigration, and the strong Neapolitan community. Stay tuned for tales of the Panier's past, from the French Connection to the cigarette trade. #Marseille #LePanier #Raspigaous #VieilleCharite #PlaceDeLenche
@aiolimarseille - AÏOLIWOOD✨MARSEILLE
Si Le Panier est le plus ancien quartier de Marseille, ce n’est pas pour rien. C’est ici que les Grecs ont fondé Massalia en 600 avant Jésus-Christ. La place de Lenche, très fréquentée aujourd’hui par les Marseillais·es, était l’Agora des Grecs il y a plusieurs siècles. La place des Moulins était quant à elle l’acropole dédiée à Athéna, déesse de la sagesse, de la stratégie militaire, des artisans, des artistes et des maîtres d’école – et considérée aussi comme la patronne et protectrice de plusieurs villes de Grèce, notamment celle d’Athènes. Le Panier est un véritable musée à ciel ouvert. Entre street-art et monuments historiques, le quartier le plus ancien de France est doté d’une richesse culturelle. Les entrailles de la ville, voilà ce que je vais vous faire découvrir dans les prochaines semaines… L’histoire de l’émigration Corse, devenus navigateurs pour certains, politiciens pour d’autres, aussi, l’immigration italienne et une forte communauté napolitaine, pêcheurs de Cettara, port de pêche de la côte amalfitaine, d’ailleurs on appelle le quartier “le petit Naples de Marseille”, fief de la french Connection et le trafic de cigarettes appelé “les combinatis” j’ai tant de choses à vous raconter à propos du panier des années 70/80 avec un natif du Panier, de Père napolitain et de Mère Corse c’est ce que l’on appelle… un pur produit local 👌✨🤍🩵 #marseille #lepanier #raspigaous #vieillecharite #placedelenche
@FabiolateleSUR - Fabiola López
#Cuba en movimiento https://t.co/C90we0mLu1
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, we meet a photographer in the Caribbean who has found his muse in capturing dancers. He describes how he used to imagine taking photos even without a camera. He shares a scene of a wet dancer on the beach, and believes it reflects the Cuban history and resilience. Gabriel Dávalos is featured in the show "Cuba en movimiento" hosted by Fabiola López, airing on Telesur.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Llegamos a una de las islas del Caribe para conocer a un fotógrafo que ha encontrado su musa retratando bailarines. Fui fotógrafo
Speaker 1: sin cámara porque la hacía en la mente, o sea, no tenía ni la cámara ni la posibilidad Tenerla, pero eso no me limitaba a soñarla. Las olas rompiendo duro contra el Maregó. Y hay un bailarín que está tendido, Mojado se adquiere sobre sus muñecas una bailarina que parece que sueña, que parece que vuela, y yo creo que eso de alguna manera tiene que ver con con la historia con la historia a los cubanos, porque los cubanos surgimos de la pesquiscencia.
Speaker 0: Sé testigo de cómo Gabriel Dávalos es parte de Cuba en movimiento, conducido por Fabiola López. Viernes, solo por Telesur.
reSee.it AI Summary
Tropical storm Tammy, recently upgraded to Category 1 hurricane in Guadeloupe, is expected to hit the Antilles. The situation on the ground is concerning, with the closure of the Pôle Caraïbes Airport, disrupted transportation, and closed schools. Residents are urged to seek shelter and stock up on essential supplies. Let's remember the devastation caused by Hurricane Irma in 2017. During this event, it is crucial to avoid spreading false information on social media, follow official accounts, and contact emergency services only in absolute emergencies. The worst of the storm is expected during the late night and early morning hours. Stay safe.
@cycylienne - Cynthia TARANTINO
Les #Antilles sont dans l’attente d’une tempête tropicale baptisée #Tammy récemment reclassée en ouragan Cat 1 en #Guadeloupe selon #Ouragans.com Situation sur place : 🌀 #Aéroport Pôle Caraïbes - Le Raizet ferme ce jour a 18h / vols reportés ou annulés. 🌀Fin des navettes bateau / des routes rendues désormais inaccessibles par mesure préventive et école fermée ce jour. 🌀La population est invitée à se mettre a l’abri / et à faire le nécessaire en nourriture et eau. On se souvient qu’ #Irma (Ouragan de cat.5 en 2017 avait dévasté particulièrement l’île de Saint-Martin. Avant et pendant l’événement : - Ne diffusez pas de fausses informations sur les RS, - Suivez et relayez uniquement les comptes officiels, - Contactez les secours au 112 qu’en cas d’urgence absolue, Il semblerait que le gros de l’événement soit attendu pour fin de nuit début de matinée.
@meteo60 - Meteo60
Des fleurs de glace sont apparues sur une rivière de l'extrême Est de la #Russie Ce phénomène semble favorisé par une grande différence de température entre l'air et l'eau. https://t.co/MRtJ4yxHiy
@HIDDENTIPS_ - Hidden Tips
Knot & Ties tutorial
@PatrickPetit - Bachi-bouzouk
Entendre ici pourquoi seulement 5% des OQTF sont exécutées.
@majuicyca - MaJuicyCa
Which one are you having today, Coconut Juice with Pink Salt or with Matcha? #matchamonday #majuicyca #matcha #coconutjuice #coconutwater #pinksalt #stayhydrated #littlesaigon #orangecounty #coconutwater #coconut
@waterson1975 - 🇩🇿🇵🇸 رياض الصلح
#HAARP #ROSÉE #projectbluebeam #theSbx Sachez simplement si ce type de technologie est rendu public. L'élite a perfectionné ses capacités et les utilise depuis des décennies...
@TechnologyVide0 - Today i Learned
The most effective massage techniques to relieve the tiredness of the day
reSee.it AI Summary
Diseases don't kill, treatments do. Cancer isn't lethal, chemotherapy is. Polio didn't vanish, it became multiple sclerosis. Old polio death photos were actually caused by thalidomide. Observe, understand, and learn.
@elzorrotacneno - Ricardo De Spirito Balbuena.
Las enfermedades no matan, matan los tratamientos. El cáncer no mata, mata la quimioterapia. La poliomielitis nunca desapareció , fue renombrada como esclerosis múltiple. Las antiguas fotos de muertes por polio, no fue por polio, fue por las consecuencias de la aplicación de la TALIDOMIDA. Mira, vea, aprenda.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Children did not die from tuberculosis but from the Tuberculín medication invented by Robert Cots. The images of children with polio are not actually polio but the result of the drug thalidomide. The deaths during the Spanish flu epidemic were caused by high doses of aspirin given to young people. The deaths attributed to HIV were actually caused by treatments like AZT and protease inhibitors. Africans do not die from malaria but from hydroxychloroquine treatments. Ebola deaths were caused by Reytonavir. Cancer is not usually fatal, but aggressive treatments like chemotherapy and radiation are. Diseases are not eradicated, they are renamed and symptoms are treated. The medical system profits from the murder of millions of people through aggressive treatments. The healthcare system is not something to be proud of, but rather a system that needs to recognize biological laws and be accessible to everyone.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: De esos niños que dicen que murieron en la posguerra de tuberculosis, no, no murieron de tuberculosis, murieron por el medicamento Taberculín inventado por Robert Cots anteriormente, que provocó miles de muertos en Alemania. Esas imágenes que nos muestran de los niños con poliomelítis no, no son imágenes que corresponden a un poliomelítis son imágenes que corresponden al drama que provocó la talidomina que dejó paralíticos y reformados a miles de niños, así que no, no eran muertos por la poliomelítis, eran por las vacunas y por los tratamientos, los que nos dicen que murieron en la epidemia de la gripe española, hay todo un argumento sobre la empresa Bayer, que perdió la patente de la aspirina, la ganó otra empresa que empleo está aspirina en dosis muy elevadas para esta supuesta gripe española. Así que no, no murieron por esta supuesta gripe española no o gripe, sino que murieron por los tratamientos, especialmente por la aspirina, que se dio en dosis muy elevadas, sobre todo a los jóvenes. No, no murieron por el virus VYH, no murieron Shida, murieron por los tratamientos administrados como la ZT, medicamento que trae en el reverso una calavera incluso, y por los inhibidores de proteasas que son indestructibles y se acumulan en cuerpo.
Estos inhibidores de proteasas, combinados con los llamados cócteles, son los que llevaban a la muerte a esta gente etiquetada de SIDA por unos test fraudulentos que ya veremos. Así que no, no murieron por el VYH, murieron por los tratamientos por el AZT. No, los africanos no mueren por malaria, por un dicho que les pica y les transmite virus, no, los africanos mueren por la hidroxicloroquina, por los tratamientos. Esta hidroxicloroquina que fue retirada al inicio de esta pandemia, en los primeros meses por ineficacia, ya sabemos lo que significa eso. Así que no, no se muere por la malaria, se mueren por los tratamientos.
No, no murieron por Ébola, murieron por el Reytonavir, no, no se ha muerto por el Sarscov dos, se ha muerto por la agresividad terapéutica mediada por una histeria promovida y buscada y por los de aislamiento que han provocado el síndrome que explico en otros vídeos. No, no se muere de cáncer, el cáncer no es mortal en un noventa y siete por ciento. Lo que matan son los tratamientos, la quimioterapia la radioterapia, los tratamientos agresivos, intervenir en un momento en el que no se debería, y esto no quiere decir que no haya casos en los que haga falta intervenir, pero son los mínimos, no, coliomelitis no se ha erradicado con una vacuna, se ha renombrado a esclerosis múltiple. No, la viruela no se ha erradicado con una vacuna, se ha renombrado con varicela, rubeola, ébola, no, las enfermedades no se radican porque son programas biológicos, son adaptaciones a momentos psicológico son parte de la biología humana y van a acompañar al ser humano mientras este exista. Por eso podemos decir que no, las enfermedades no se radican, no desaparecen se están renombrando los síntomas y nos hacen creer que con una vacuna desaparecen.
Las sintomatologías existen, pero no tienen por qué ser mortales hecho, como decimos en un noventa y siete por ciento no lo son, incluido el cáncer. Cada día son asesinadas, miles y millones de personas con quimioterapias y tratamientos agresivos podríamos llamarlos directamente armas químicas, así que vemos que esta pandemia no lleva activa solamente dos años, sino que lleva mucho más tiempo desde el ocultamiento de estas leyes biológicas hace más de cuarenta años. No hay derecho a que esta élite científica, no digo, los médicos de a pie, se esté lucran del asesinato a través de la sanidad y nosotros ignorantes, defendiendo el sistema sanitario que tenemos, es el mejor, ojalá el tercer mundo tuviera peso a esta sanidad, y es que no me extraña que pensemos eso cuando creemos que nos curamos cuando nos quitan los síntomas y no conocemos el asesinato encubierto que ahí bajó los tratamientos, haciéndonos creer que es el cuerpo humano el que donde están las verdaderas estadísticas, los muertos por cáncer no son por los tumores, es por los tratamientos. Su malena y atrogenia que hay en los hospitales por el desconocimiento de leyes biológicas y a ver si los muertos que se achacan a las enfermedades biológicas deben de ser achacadas a tratamientos y negligencias médicas.
Por lo tanto, no es una sanidad a alardear, no es una sanidad que queremos para todos, para nada, queremos que se conozca las leyes biológicas y queremos que sean de acceso a todo el mundo.
@DBestrong - DontbelieveBestrong
Jajajaja.. Boom the supposedly rich country like the United States, is last on this list and pays 0 !!!!
@DBestrong - DontbelieveBestrong
#DEW / Direct Energy Weapon in #Turkey
reSee.it AI Summary
In a conversation, @10121Ws shared that 100 cities plan to ban meat, dairy, and private cars by 2030. @AveNamto mentioned that 1143 cities are part of the "City race to zero" program. @DBestrong added that these efforts align with the 17 Sustainable Development Goals of the Agenda 2030.
@10121Ws - WS 10121
𝘾40 𝘾𝙄𝙏𝙄𝙀𝙎. 100 villes prévoient d'interdire la viande, les produits laitiers et les voitures particulières d'ici 2030. https://tkp.at/2023/08/21/100-staedte-wollen-bis-2030-fleisch-milchprodukte-und-private-autos-verbieten/
100 Städte wollen bis 2030 Fleisch, Milchprodukte und private Autos verbieten
100 Städte haben eine Koalition mit der Bezeichnung “C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group” (C40) gebildet. Die C40 hat sich ein “ehrgeiziges Ziel” gesetzt, um […]
tkp.at
@AveNamto - Ave Namto
@10121Ws 1143 villes font partie du programme appelé: "City race to zero" le lien vers la map^^ https://www.c40knowledgehub.org/s/cities-race-to-zero-public?language=en_US
Cities Race to Zero Public
c40knowledgehub.org
@DBestrong - DontbelieveBestrong
@AveNamto @10121Ws http://www.c40.org
C40 Cities - A global network of mayors taking urgent climate action
C40 Cities is a global network of nearly 100 mayors of the world’s leading cities that are united in action to confront the climate crisis.
c40.org
@DBestrong - DontbelieveBestrong
@AveNamto @10121Ws Accouplées aux 17 ODD aka SDGs de l'Agenda 2030 du WEF !!
@DBestrong - DontbelieveBestrong
#ClimateEngineering #Geoengineering #WeatherControl #WeatherWarfare #WeatherManipulation #lookup #climateterrorism