TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Piqui0990
@Yolo304741 - AG 🔥
Holy Sh*t. THIS is a must watch!
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the goal of eradicating humanity and how we have been conditioned and manipulated to accept a posthuman future. They mention various methods used to destabilize and dehumanize society, such as the destruction of the nuclear family, indoctrination of children, and the eradication of spirituality. The speaker also highlights the attack on masculinity and the transgender movement, which they believe is part of a larger agenda to push for transhumanism. They express concern about the harm caused to children and emphasize the need to stop this process.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The final goal is to eradicate humanity as we know it. Once you understand the final destination, it becomes much easier to look back and identify the psychological conditioning, the biological tampering, the cultural grooming, and the educational prepping that we have been subjected to for decades in preparation to making us accept a posthuman future. It takes a lot of physical and psychological abuse to get an intelligent species like ours to agree to its own extinction. Most, if not all, that has transcended in the last 60 years was designed to get us closer to accepting in such a dystopian reality. Whether you care to accept it or not, we live in a hyper controlled matrix where our Our perception of reality is meticulously planned, managed, and executed in order to control and steer us in whichever direction than they wish, and the direction is a posthuman world.
For this, they first needed to destabilize, dehumanize, and demoralize lies humanity through every means possible. The destruction of the nuclear family, children being indoctrinated by the state, abortion, on the eradication of God and spirituality from education, life in mega cities and away from nature, toxic Sick food, air, and water, social media, replacing real human connection and interaction, and you need Financial crisis and taxation, endless wars and massive migration, stress, anxiety, depression, drugs and alcohol, Constant fear mongering, moral relativism as the new religion, and I could go on and on about how humanity as being influenced and forced to move away from all the things that give us strength, security, purpose, and meaning. A weak, immoral, disconnected, ignorant, and unhealthy population is an easy target for the next stage, the creation of an entire generation of androgynous beings. Masculinity is under attack psychologically, culturally, and biologically. Women are being replaced in sports, entertainment, and politics by men pretending to be women, and children by being indoctrinated at school to think that gender is a choice.
The transgender movement is not a grassroots movement. It comes from the top. It has nothing to do with people's freedom of expression, sexuality, or civil rights. It's an evil say up, to with a clear agenda to get us closer to transhumanism by making us question the most fundamental notion of human identity. Agenda.
If you don't know who you are, if you already identify as a hybrid between a man and a woman. You will be easily convinced to become a hybrid between human and machine. Gender ideology is the 2 plus 2 equals 5 from George Orwell's 1984 dystopian novel. It's the final test to see whether we will follow the most absurd party line towards our own extinction. But 2 plus 2 equals 4.
And no matter how you choose to dress, call yourself, or change your physique, we'll not change that. The sad reality though, is that in the gaslighting process to get us closer to a post human future, they have mentally and physically They harmed an increasing number of children and young people, and it's only getting worse. This must be stopped.
@Yolo304741 - AG 🔥
About | Laura Aboli
Laura wishes to inspire, motivate and uplift her readers and viewers. Her work aims to make people think, discover new perspectives, feel good and focus on a positive outlook on life, health, love, spirituality and more. www.lauraaboli.com
lauraaboli.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Thousands of migrants are waiting to be processed by Border Patrol in Eagle Pass, TX. Union Pacific is unhappy with the Biden administration's decision to shut down two international railway bridges in Eagle Pass and El Paso, as it is impacting various industries.
@BillMelugin_ - Bill Melugin
BREAKING: Video from a contact on the ground in Eagle Pass, TX right now shows a mass of thousands of migrants waiting to be processed by Border Patrol after they crossed illegally today. I’ve spent hundreds of days there over the last 2+ years and I’ve never seen it like this.
@BillMelugin_ - Bill Melugin
NEW: Union Pacific is responding to the Biden administration’s decision to shut down two international railway bridges in Eagle Pass and El Paso in order to redirect CBP personnel to help Border Patrol process large groups of illegal immigrants. Not happy. https://x.com/unionpacific/status/1736829135962415445?s=46&t=3r0C795y7EMxoYrok_At6Q
@UnionPacific - Union Pacific
Roughly 45% of all rail cars moving to and from Mexico cross through El Paso and Eagle Pass – there isn’t enough capacity at the other four gateways to reroute them. Union Pacific urges the Eagle Pass and El Paso border crossings be reopened immediately. This is impacting: • Agricultural products (grain held in six Midwest states) • Food and beverages (beer and dry food products) • Automotive (finished vehicles and parts) • Consumer goods • Industrial commodities (metals and cement) Read more at: https://www.up.com/index.htm
Union Pacific
Union Pacific operates North America's premier railroad franchise, covering 23 states in the western two-thirds of the United States.
up.com
@BillMelugin_ - Bill Melugin
BREAKING: Video from a contact on the ground in Eagle Pass, TX right now shows a mass of thousands of migrants waiting to be processed by Border Patrol after they crossed illegally today. I’ve spent hundreds of days there over the last 2+ years and I’ve never seen it like this. https://t.co/JPNYY7sPxI
@CitizenFreePres - Citizen Free Press
Dr. Ben Carson explains what is happening in America: "Other countries that became socialist or communist, what did they do first? Divided the people, and they also dumbed down the population." https://t.co/HO37H6wrmD
Video Transcript AI Summary
We must remember that as Americans, we are not enemies. There are those who seek to divide us based on various factors like race, age, income, gender, political affiliation, and religion. This tactic has been used in other countries that turned socialist or communist. Additionally, there is a trend of dumbing down the population in our country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The fact of the matter is we, the American people, we are not enemies. Wayne, we are not enemies. We have to remember that because people are trying to divide us on the basis of race, age, Income, gender, political affiliation, religion, you name it. And what has happened In other countries that became socialist or communist, what did they do first? Divided the people.
And they also dumbed down the population. Isn't that going on in our country right now? They're dumbing down the population.
reSee.it AI Summary
A mother who starved her disabled son to death faced trial, where she vomited upon seeing photos of his emaciated body. The boy, Timothy, endured torture, including ice baths and being shackled. An autopsy revealed malnourishment and hypothermia as the cause of death. The mother was found guilty of murder and child abuse, while her son also faces charges for assisting in the crimes.
@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg
NEW: Mother who starved her disabled 15-year-old son to death barfs on stand after she was showed photos of his starved body just hours before he died. There is a special place in h*ll for people like this Shanda Vander Ark tortured her own son by making him take four hour long ice baths, forcing him to eat hot sauce, forcing him to stay away, shackling him with zip ties and making him sleep in a closet. An autopsy report found that the disabled boy, Timothy, died of malnourishment and hypothermia. He weighed only 69 pounds. After barfing on stand, Arkjury was found guilty of murder and child abuse and faces mandatory life in prison. Paul, who testified against his mother, is also facing one count of first-degree child abuse for assisting with the crimes.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker confirms that they gave Timothy a warm bath the night before he passed away. This information was not previously disclosed to anyone involved in the case, including the police officers. The speaker is asked if they put Timothy in the bathtub and confirms that they did. The video abruptly ends with a discussion about trash in the community.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Testified that you gave Paul that you gave Timothy a warm bath the night before he passed away, that last night, July 5th. Do you recall that?
Speaker 1: Yes, sir.
Speaker 0: That was the first time you told anybody connected to this case that you'd done that, isn't it? Yes, sir. You never told the police officers you did that, did you? No, sir. I I imagine warm bath sounds just like it's just what it sounds like, right?
You got them, you took them to the bath, you drew a warm bath for them, and you put them in the bathtub, right? This is hours before he dies. Right? Yes, sir. He looked like that when you put him in the bathtub.
I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: Gotta make the envelope on this. Yes? That's fine. Mister Vanderaki,
Speaker 0: do we have a trash community? Yeah.
Speaker 1: That has trash.
Speaker 0: You did? Yeah.
@CarlosSimancas - Uncensored USA 🇺🇸
This is funny. 😆 😆 😆 https://t.co/9PeKGTbqk3
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this Christmas show, the hosts exchange jokes they've never seen before. They introduce a special guest, Dr. Hattie Davis, and then proceed with the jokes. The first joke is about geneticists planning to bring back the dodo bird. The second joke mentions Beyonce's controversial Instagram photo. They also discuss the Adult Survivors Act and a musical about Michael Jackson. The hosts end on a positive note, expressing the need for unity in the Middle East. They mention that movie theaters in New York can now serve alcohol, and one host jokingly compliments his wife's movies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, tonight, guys, is our Christmas show, and we have a tradition where Che and I give each other jokes to read. So
Speaker 1: We're making each other read jokes live on air that the other person has never seen before.
Speaker 0: Right. And the idea is to give each other, you know, like fun jokes that could be fun.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Sure. But before we start, there's someone very special here who was last on this show Season 3, 46 years ago, poet, author, and activist. Please welcome doctor Hattie Davis. And, yeah, Colin, you can start with your first joke.
Speaker 0: Hi.
Speaker 1: Oh, my god.
Speaker 0: A group of geneticists have announced Plans to bring back the dodo and reintroduce it to Africa. And if you ask me, I can think of at least 1 dodo I'd like to reintroduce to
Speaker 1: Woman's an activist call. Last month, Beyonce posted a photo On Instagram of herself in a chrome Versace dress and platinum blonde hair that many people online described as too white. In fact, Beyonce looked so white That I was finally attracted to. That is Wow.
Speaker 0: The Adult Survivors Act, which allowed sex abuse victims to file lawsuits Even after the statute of limitations expire, has resulted in several new suits. Figures, because bitches love bringing up old stuff.
Speaker 1: The woman marched with King. NBA, the musical about the life of Michael Jackson, has become one of the Highest grossing shows on Broadway. And my review of the acting is the same as my opinion of MJ's trial. Michael is amazing, but the kids are not believable at all. But I don't wanna end like that.
It's the holidays, and I wanna end on A positive, uplifting note, especially with all the turmoil in the Middle East right now. So I wanna say from the bottom of my heart, whether you're Jew, it's your Muslim. Y'all need Jesus. Wow. Oh, wow.
Wow. That was really wow.
Speaker 0: That was a great message.
Speaker 1: Wow. Oh, that was a
Speaker 0: great message. Wow. That's a great message. If people can find you on Instagram, that's cool. New York State now allows movie theaters to serve alcohol, which is how I'm finally able to enjoy my wife's little art movies.
I'm kidding, honey. I love all of your movies. And if you ask Me? You're an even better black widow than Coretta Scott King.
@RNCResearch - RNC Research
Democrat Rep. Joaquin Castro says passing border security measures would be "surrendering to right-wing racism" https://t.co/M1jqdhZWtq
Video Transcript AI Summary
To the democrats in the senate and others considering supporting this proposal, I urge you to think twice. Supporting it means surrendering to right wing racism and even enabling it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I want to speak quickly to the democrats in the senate and others who are considering supporting this proposal. If you do so, you will be surrendering to right wing racism. That's right. And more than that, you will be enabling it.
@ImMeme0 - I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸
Rapper BlueFace has a white woman to come on the stage and gets her jumped. https://t.co/JawK7HMFVL
@AprilSpark1890 - April Sparks
This is the city of San Antonio’s Illegal Alien and Human Trafficking Center at 7000 San Pedro Ave. Our streets are being over run. This must stop immediately!!! @GovAbbott https://t.co/zZ4fSWDxnQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Welcome to my house in San Antonio. The streets here are filled with trash, and it's a constant issue. The city only comes to pick it up every few days, which is not enough. It's frustrating to see this problem persist, and it makes me believe that our country should find a better solution to handle it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome to my house. These are the streets the streets of San Antonio now. The streets of San Antonio. Get all the trash. You know, I think I watch, the city come pick up Every other day, every couple of days, but this is where we're at.
It's horrible. You're gonna tell me our country can't figure out a better way to deal with this. You can't tell me that our country cannot find a better way to deal with this.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Madison Cawthorn told us. https://t.co/gTjQahW7kU
Video Transcript AI Summary
In Washington, the speaker, a young person, observes the sexual perversion among older politicians. They are shocked when invited to a sexual gathering that turns out to be an orgy. The speaker also witnesses hypocrisy among leaders who advocate against addiction, as they openly use cocaine. The speaker finds these experiences to be wild and unexpected.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sexual perversion that goes on in Washington. I mean, being kind of a young guy in Washington, where the average age is probably 60 or 70. And I look at all these people, a lot of them that I I you know, I've looked up to through my life. I've always paid attention to politics, guys that you know? Then all of a sudden, you get invited to, like, well, hey.
We're gonna have kind of a a sexual get together at one of our homes. You should come. And I'm like, what what what did you just ask me to come to? Yeah. And then you realize they're asking you to come to an orgy.
Or the fact that, you know, there's some of the people that are leading on the movement to try and remove, you know, addiction in our country. And then you watch them do, you know, a key bump of cocaine right in front of you. Man, it's like, wow, this is wild.
@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth
This mother has some kind of hatred on her heart and she’s teaching it to her daughter… https://rumble.com/v41l5bz-proof-that-racism-isnt-embedded-into-our-dna-it-is-taught.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker scolds someone for taking something from a girl and tells them not to do it again. They encourage the girl, Miyoki, to knock it down and tear it up. They mention that Karen will have to deal with it. The speaker praises Miyoki for being a good girl and tells her to grab it and tear it out. They express indifference towards the situation and warn the person not to put their hands on Miyoki.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Don't you snatch that from her. Don't do that again. Yeah. Knock it down. Tear it up.
Yep. And step on it. And Karen's just gonna have to deal with it. The Yep. Knock all of it down.
Good girl. Very good, Miyoki. And grab it and tear it out. Oh, well. Turn up again.
Don't put your hands on her. Don't don't do that. Yeah.
Proof that Racism isn’t embedded into our DNA, it is taught
Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper
rumble.com
@WesternLensman - Western Lensman
Joe Biden: Decency is on the ballot! https://t.co/20UHXfIHin
Video Transcript AI Summary
Character, compassion, decency, science, and democracy are all at stake in this election. It's not just about who we are as a nation, but also about who we aspire to be. The speaker asks a 17-year-old how old they are, implying that their vote is crucial.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Character is on the ballot. Compassion is on the ballot. Decency, science, democracy, they're all on the ballot. Who we are as a nation, what we stand for, and most importantly, who we want to be, that's all on the ballot. How old are you?
17? Your choice could not be more
reSee.it AI Summary
A Senate staffer was caught filming a gay sex tape in a Senate hearing room, as reported by the Daily Caller. This incident adds to the controversies surrounding the current administration.
@ImMeme0 - I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸
🚨BREAKING: Senate Staffer Caught Filming Gay Sex Tape In Senate Hearing Room Revealed by Daily Caller. A congressional staffer apparently made an amateur pornography video in the Senate hearing room where all the senators sit. Cocaine in the White House, gay porn in the Senate, only in Biden’s America.
reSee.it AI Summary
I obtained an internal document from IBM's RedHat that outlines the "Allyship Commandments," which includes race-based rules for employees. One commandment states that only white people can be racist, while another emphasizes the responsibility of white people in dismantling racism. The document also highlights the impact of whiteness in shaping and perpetuating systemic inequalities.
@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe
BREAKING: OMG obtained an internal document from @IBM ‘s RedHat that reads like a religious text: The "Allyship Commandments" are 10 race-based rules employees must observe. One commandment states “only white people can be racist” Another states, “Accepts that WHITE people are responsible for dismantling racism" From a different section: “Whiteness constructs the game, hides the rules, then rigs the game, over and over again.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
IBM subsidiary Red Hat is facing backlash for its alleged discriminatory hiring practices. An internal document reveals that Red Hat had an allyship program resembling a religion, with employees expected to follow 10 commandments. Failure to comply could result in termination. Some of the commandments include acknowledging that the black community owes nothing, avoiding white saviorism, and not seeking recognition. This story has sparked outrage within corporate America, with numerous reports of similar experiences. The source of the document remains anonymous, and the issue continues to be investigated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've just received another internal document from within IBM's subsidiary, Red Hat, from another brave whistleblower inside the company. You're not going to believe this. We've been reporting all week on IBM and Red Hat's discriminatory hiring practices, and it just keeps getting worse. Apparently, back in 2020, Red Hat had an allyship program within the company asking employees to follow certain commandments. So they've turned this DEI thing into some type of religion.
Now I'm gonna read from this slide here. This is given to us by an insider inside IBM, quote, your allyship commitment accepts these fundamental truths. The document reads listing 10 commandments employees must adhere to. If they don't follow the commandments, we have to take former CEO Paul Cormier, who's currently the chairman at his word. Those employees will no longer be working at Red Hat.
Speaker 1: I could name multiple leaders over the last year plus that were held accountable to the point that they're no longer here at Red Hat Because they weren't willing to live up to the standards that we set in this space.
Speaker 0: Here's an example of some of the commandments. Knows the black community owes us nothing in this work, is never rooted in white Sabreism and does not seek recognition or praise for a job well done. One of the biggest complaints about DEI is that it borders on a new religion. Now it's hard to deny there's an underlying religious aspect of DEI when it's literally called the 10 Commandments. This story has hit an unprecedented nerve inside of corporate America with hundreds, perhaps even thousands of DMs to OMG for within companies all over the place saying they've experienced crazy stuff like this.
We'll stay on top of it. It's, of course, a full time job merely responding to all the messages that we see, but the ones with documents and video take high priority. And as always, we'll protect our sources. If you're on the inside, it's tips.okeithmediagroup.com or communicate with us on SIGNAL at this number. Stay tuned.
reSee.it AI Summary
We provide significant funding to Ukraine, covering various expenses including teacher and janitor salaries, not just military support. It's important to remember that the salaries of everyone in our country are funded by taxpayers. However, some argue that we should stop sending money to Ukraine, claiming they have already lost.
@WallStreetSilv - Wall Street Silver
"We are funding one-third of Ukraine's government" "That includes teacher salaries and janitor salaries, not just the military" "Everybody's salary is funded by the US taxpayer" "The people in our country are deciding between food and medicine" 🔊 … 🚨🚨🚨 Stop sending our $$$ to Ukraine. It is over, they lost.
Video Transcript AI Summary
We fund one third of Ukraine's government, which includes salaries for teachers, janitors, and everyone else, not just the military. Meanwhile, people in our country are struggling to afford basic necessities like food and medicine. We need to focus on our own problems instead of paying for their government. Our priority should be to stop the killing and provide American leadership, rather than giving more money without any conditions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We are funding 1 third of Ukraine's government. That includes teacher salaries, janitor salaries, everybody's not just the military. Everybody's salaries are funded by the US taxpayers as the people in our country are deciding between food or medicine.
Speaker 1: Right now, people in Ohio can't afford
Speaker 0: just Food. Young people can't
Speaker 1: afford to buy homes. We're paying for their government. You're exactly right. We've gotta focus on our own problems. And, Laura, just The thing that is in our best interest is to get the killing to stop.
That's what we should be doing with American leadership, not writing more blank checks to enlist people.
Speaker 0: Lecture, lecture your
@RNCResearch - RNC Research
U.S. officials are now warning Border Patrol agents to watch out for IEDs — improvised explosive devices — according to an internal memo. "Agents should exercise extreme caution." https://t.co/hJENAZsptI
Video Transcript AI Summary
US officials have issued a warning to agents about the presence of Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) at the border. An internal memo obtained by FOX Business reveals that the Mexican military has discovered 10 explosives in the area. The memo advises agents to be extremely cautious and report any individuals approaching the border with potential explosive devices.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: US officials are warning agents to watch out for IEDs, Improvised Explosive Devices. This now, according to an internal memo attained by FOX Business, says the Mexican military sees 10 explosives at the border. The memo reads in part, quote, agents should exercise extreme caution and should report any possible armed subjects approaching the border with possible explosive devices
@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd
👀 Jim Breuer: “We’re at war…Unfortunately humanity doesn’t believe that evil exists. And boy, does it exist. And you’d be horrified when you realize where they’re all located.” https://t.co/Sqet1cZYGE
Video Transcript AI Summary
Mayors and governors are being criticized for their actions during the pandemic. The speaker believes they are despicable and should be held accountable for dividing people and causing harm. They feel that their taxes are being misused and that their children are being indoctrinated. The speaker sees this as a war on common sense, control, spirituality, and consciousness. They believe that evil exists and that those who are aware of it are ready for a change.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You had mayors? Despicable. Disgusting. They're not human. They're disgusting.
And they should be held accountable. All of them. Every single last one of them. Every mayor, every governor That shamed you, terrorized you, tore your family apart, made you lose your job, Divided everybody. Those are the most disgusting display of humanity, and these are the people that are controlling My life and your life that they're taking my money from and doing whatever they want with it.
I don't have a choice where my taxes go. That time, That's how I saw it. I saw it as a complete takeover. And then in my own house, you know, these kids are all indoctrinated, So the kids are like, dad's crazy. Mhmm.
Hey, man. Your father's putting up and I I saw what they were going through. I had nieces. You know, I had my daughter come up to me and a niece that I love said, dad, is everything cool? Because everyone thinks You're, you know, you're making wacky videos.
I felt we're at war a 100%. This is war however you wanna describe it. It's a war on your common sense. It's a war on the control of your life. It's the war on your spirituality.
It's the war of your conscious and your mind, and it's not a game. It's real. Unfortunately, humanity doesn't believe that evil exists. And boy, does it exist. Does.
And you'd be horrified when you realize where they're all located. And I'm not sure Some people can handle that, but I think the ones that can are very ready. Very ready. They're done.
@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd
Full Video: https://youtu.be/TYYIJ52J8tg
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
The Mayor of Boston @MayorWu responds to the viral story of her inviting only black people to a segregated Holiday party. She defends the party and apologizes that the white councilmembers found out. She’s not sorry. She’s just sorry you found out! https://t.co/q0gBqbDWLd
Video Transcript AI Summary
We've spoken individually with everyone to explain that the email mistake was unintentional. I'm excited to celebrate with everyone at the upcoming holiday parties, as well as other events. My goal is for our city to embody our values and provide a welcoming environment for all communities to unite.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think we've we've had individual conversations with everyone so people understand that it was truly just, an honest mistake that went out in in typing the email field. And, I look forward to celebrating with everyone at the holiday parties that we will have besides this one as well. So, it is my intention that we can, again, be a city that lives our values and create space for all kinds of communities to come together.
@SebGorka - Sebastian Gorka DrG
I’d like to report a murder. CNN is dead. https://t.co/E7br5Wteo6
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses concern about the events of January 6th, stating that if they had heard about it three years ago, they would have dismissed it as a conspiracy theory. They highlight the government's history of lying and cover-ups, including the origins of COVID-19 and the Hunter Biden laptop. The speaker suggests that there were federal agents present during the Capitol attack and questions why footage of law enforcement's actions was suppressed. They also mention a case of entrapment involving the FBI and argue that the government cannot manipulate individuals into committing crimes and then charge them for it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You used the phrase inside job to describe what happened on January 6th. The next day, the a hosteter threatened members of congress. He brought a hatchet, knives, pepper spray, sun batons, tactical gear to the US Capitol. Are you concern that a convicted felon like that is now promoting your comments in court.
Speaker 1: So here's my concern, Abby, and I wanna tell you guys where I'm If you had told me it's close to 3 years ago that January 6, 2021 happened, if you had told me 3 years ago back when the biotech CEO, not steeped in this world. I was just consuming passive media, but was focused on my world of developing medicines. If you had told me that January 6 was in any way an inside job, the subject of government entrapment, I would have told you that was crazy talk. Fringe conspiracy theory nonsense. I could tell you now having gone somewhat deep in this, it's not.
I mean, the reality is this. We do have a government first of all, we have to acknowledge that has lied to us systematically over the last several years about the origin of COVID 19. About the Hunter Biden laptop that we were told was false by 51 CIA experts and otherwise before we now know that it was true. You can go straight down the The Trump Russia disinformation collusion hoax, all of it. Now we come to January 6th.
The reality is we know that there were federal law agents in that field, we don't know how many. I think it's a shame. If let me finish this to Andrew.
Speaker 0: I'm going to go ahead and interrupt you here because the establishment doesn't approve it as best.
Speaker 1: I know this is for
Speaker 0: federal agents. You're saying that there were federal agents in
Speaker 1: the past. This is important to talk about.
Speaker 0: There were federal agents in the pad on on on January 6th. Yep. There is no evidence that there were federal agents in the crowd on January 6th.
Speaker 1: So so why before congress when pressed on what the number was. They didn't say there were none. They just couldn't say there
Speaker 0: were none. Saying that there's no that you have not seen any evidence So we've seen Mark.
Speaker 1: We've seen multiple informants suggesting that were we know people were we know people were FBI informants who were asking Is
Speaker 0: there any evidence? May just finish
Speaker 1: this and become that question now.
Speaker 0: Let me clarify. I know
Speaker 1: it's very uncomfortable for you.
Speaker 0: I'm gonna clarify my question.
Speaker 1: Uncomfortable to many people, but we have to do the truth.
Speaker 0: I'm gonna clarify my question because I wanna make sure that you understand what I meant.
Speaker 1: I understand this deeply. And I told you I was just 3 years ago. I'm with you now.
Speaker 0: Evidence Yes. Where is the evidence that the government had applied an inside job
Speaker 1: But no. No. I'm not gonna I'm not violence
Speaker 0: on January I'm
Speaker 1: not gonna let you put words in my mouth. I'm gonna put my words in my mouth, and I'm gonna tell you what what I mean by that. There is
Speaker 0: evidence that the government was involved in planning or executing January 6th,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna give you I'm gonna give you hard facts, and and if I may, Abby. I know this is gonna be a little uncomfortable, but we're gonna we're gonna through so you can and you can you can push back on
Speaker 0: it out? The evidence.
Speaker 1: And you can push back on that. And let's do this fairly. Why did they suppress footage of now what's been release 200 hours of footage of shooting rubber bullets into that crowd, shooting tear gas into that crowd. You didn't see that before. You saw what the response was to that.
Now you see footage coming out actually rolling out the red carpet for capitalists allowing us to begin
Speaker 0: again right through the front door. Vast majority that part
Speaker 1: it shouldn't have been released before ever.
Speaker 0: Mr. Armstrong, the dashboards that it shows in my deep question is yes. And I'm going to talk about one more piece by violence I'm going
Speaker 1: to give you
Speaker 0: some hard facts. So here's what entrapment is. I'm
Speaker 1: not cherry picking. He's not cherry picking.
Speaker 0: He's not cherry picking. He's not cherry picking.
Speaker 1: Kent Falls To the contrary, to the contrary,
Speaker 0: to the contrary that example.
Speaker 1: You know
Speaker 0: Cherry thinks that is what happened in January 6th. The government
Speaker 1: cherry picked 12 hours of footage when there was 200 I cherry picking was the government, not me. Release the whole thing. And let me let me just finish one thing too, because this is super important as a topic. So when you I think there's a civil libertarian issue of our time. When we talked about kidnapping.
I wanna keep it I wanna be really clear on this because it's the same issue in the same FBI, same even part of the FBI. Three people who were in an alleged plot to kidnap Gretchen Whitmer, were acquitted at the end of trial because it was entrapment. That is government agents put them up to do something they otherwise wouldn't have done. They give them credit cards with spending limits of up to $5,000, encourage them to buy munitions, plan something think they weren't otherwise willing to plan so much so, and I want people at home to know this, especially CNN viewers to know this, is that one of jurors went to those defendants and apologized afterwards, gave him a hug, apologized, seeing what the government had put a poor guy up to, who had to go to some Mexican restaurant across the street to get hot water. These people were exploited with credit cards up to $5,000, FBI agents Putting them up to a kidnapping plot that we were told was true but was entrapment.
Speaker 0: Same thing
Speaker 1: with the Capitol Police. People
Speaker 0: listening to the police.
Speaker 1: Many of those people, they Mister
Speaker 0: Amish Amish Amish Amish Amish Amish Amish Amish Amish Amish Amish Amish Amish Amish, look.
Speaker 1: The government cannot put you up to do something and then charge
Speaker 0: you for
Speaker 1: your money. That's all.
Speaker 0: I don't wanna have to to the left side of the line. I don't wanna have to
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
BIDEN: “We’ve already begun to secure contracts on three new COVID vaccines.” https://t.co/auW62Lq5K4
Video Transcript AI Summary
We are working to ensure fair pricing for drugs developed with taxpayer money. If drug companies set high prices that Americans can't afford, the government can allow other companies to produce and sell the same drug at a lower cost. This promotes competition, lowers costs, raises wages, and improves care. We are also cracking down on anti-competitive practices in healthcare, including junk health insurance plans.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's a simple principle. You shouldn't pay a highest price in the world for drugs that your tax dollars have already helped create. We've already begun to secure fair pricing clauses and contracts for new COVID vaccines. And we recently proposed that when a drug company prices drugs so high that the Americans can't afford them and those drugs were created by the American tax dollars, The federal government can step in and allow other companies to make and sell that same drug for less because they did it here. This is all part of my administration's work to promote competition across our economy, to lower costs, to raise wages, and improve care.
Last week, we announced new steps to crack down on anti competitive practices in health care. And we're going after a drug we call junk fees, like junk health insurance plans.
@CitizenFreePres - Citizen Free Press
Tucker Carlson on X Ep. 51 just dropped: An interview with UFO whistleblower Dave Grusch. https://t.co/y46VYIUchj
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, former government officials and military intelligence officer Dave Grush discuss the increasing number of UFO sightings and the need for transparency and disclosure. They highlight the secrecy surrounding the topic and the reprisals faced by those who speak out. The speaker also emphasizes the lack of progress in integrating breakthrough technologies into society and draws parallels between the classified Kennedy assassination files and potential secrecy surrounding UFO-related information. They explore the possibility of a spiritual connection to these phenomena and the potential relationship between the US government and nonhuman intelligences. The nuclear connection in UFO sightings is also mentioned. The speaker expresses concerns about personal threats and emphasizes the importance of the UAP Disclosure Act in bringing about change.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Human beings have recorded seeing strange moving lights in the sky since, well, the beginning of known history. Record goes back thousands of years. What is that? We don't know. In the United States, people have been talking a lot about these strange lights UFOs since the Second World War when military pilots recorded seeing things they called Foo Fighters out their cockpit windows.
They had no idea what they were. The last 80 years, it seems like there has been a continuous increase in the sightings of these things, these UFOs or UAPs, And there's a whole industry that has grown up around describing what they are or may be. But it wasn't until very recently in the last 18 months that former government officials began stepping forward in public to say what they believe they are people with direct firsthand knowledge of the government's interactions with these objects or vehicles or people or whatever they are. One such person who has come forward recently is a longtime military intelligence officer, an Air Force Major, called Dave Grush. He's made a number of very interesting claims in public, including at congressional hearings.
For example, here he is telling the Congress, in fact, the US government has retrieved bodies, or as he puts it, biologics, from crashed UAPs. Watch.
Speaker 1: Do you believe that officials at the highest levels of our national security apparatus have unlawfully withheld information from Congress and subverted, our oversight authority?
Speaker 2: There are certain elected leaders that had more information that I'm not sure what they've shared with certain gang event members or etcetera, but, certainly, I would not be surprised.
Speaker 1: Okay. You've stated that the government is in possession of potentially non human spacecraft. Based on your experience and extensive conversations with experts, do you believe our government has made contact with intelligence extraterrestrials?
Speaker 2: Something I can't discuss in public setting.
Speaker 1: Okay. I can't ask when you think this occurred. If you believe we have crashed craft, stated earlier, do we have the bodies of the pilots who piloted this craft?
Speaker 2: As I've stated publicly already in my NewsNation interview, biologics came with some of these recoveries. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Were they, I guess, human or non human biologics?
Speaker 2: Non human, and that was the assessment of people with direct knowledge on the program I talked to that are currently still on the program.
Speaker 1: And was this documentary evidence, this video, photos, eyewitness, like how would that be determined?
Speaker 2: The specific documentation I would have to talk to you and a SCIF about.
Speaker 0: SCIF being a secure location where the highest classified intelligence can be discussed among people who have permission to hear it. Dave Rush is the man you just saw in that video he joins us now. Thanks so much for coming on. So before you get into fleshing out some of what you told Nancy Mace in that clip, could you tell us about your background? Who are you?
Where are you from? What have you spent your life doing?
Speaker 2: Yeah, I spent my entire life growing up in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, you know, son of, you know, very normal income, you know, typical family. Spent most of my my youth playing basketball and tennis and I ended up going to the University of Pittsburgh, where I went into Air Force ROTC. I had a full scholarship in physics at the time, and, yeah, born and bred in Pittsburgh. And then once I graduated Pitts, ended up commissioning in the Air Force as a 2nd Lieutenant and, went on active duty, and I ended up spending, 14 years in the Air Force, both active duty and reserve, And also I became a government civilian at the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency and I was lucky enough to be Brought in at the the GS fifteen level which is equivalent to like a full bird colonel, civilian.
Speaker 0: National Geospatial on MacArthur Boulevard in DC.
Speaker 2: It's in Springfield, Virginia.
Speaker 0: Oh, it is?
Speaker 2: For for Bevoir.
Speaker 0: Right. What is that, by the way?
Speaker 2: So that agency collects All imagery, other types of visual intelligence to make fuse products called geospatial intelligence products. So think about the National Reconnaissance Office, you know, flies the bus, so to speak, they fly the satellites. The National Geospatial Intelligence Agency processes
Speaker 0: That intelligence Okay. So if there's stuff floating above the earth, it's their job to know about it, I assume?
Speaker 2: Process the intelligence coming off, you know, satellites flying around The Earth. Yes.
Speaker 0: So you spent over 14 years in this world.
Speaker 2: Yes.
Speaker 0: And then Suddenly, the rest of us encounter you in public saying that the U. S. Government has very detailed knowledge of what these things are and has for a long time.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I had no personal interest in the UFO subject, really. You know, certainly, I, you know, grew up and I saw stuff in the history, you know, that kind of thing. But Having studied physics, became an intel officer, I was very agnostic about the subject, and I was in a position of extreme trust. You Now I handled the Presidential Daily Brief for my agency's director at the National Constance Office when I was an Air Force Reserve officer.
It was widely cleared, to most black programs in the Department of Defense.
Speaker 0: What's a black program?
Speaker 2: You know, special access program. Right? And, I figured kind of, That I would know if if that kind of program exists. It was kind of a joke between, you know, myself and other colleagues over the years, like, when when are we gonna get read into, you know, the UFO stuff? And we thought that it was a total joke, but it wasn't until, you know, I saw the New York Times article in in 2017, and and I What was that article?
So that was a a story about, Lou Elizondo and other individuals that ran the, the AATIP program and the AAWSAT program. So fancy aerospace weapon systems applications To be clear,
Speaker 0: I think the government has never admitted that he was or denied, in fact, Elizondo was involved with.
Speaker 2: No. He certainly was. I remember, in a very senior official's office in McLean, Briefing that senior official into about a couple 100 special access programs because at the time, I was a trusted individual, advising the Joint Chiefs on Certain black programs. And I remember that individual who was a co worker of, you know, Lou Elizondo, mentioned, Oh, there's this guy named named Lou Elizondo over at the Pentagon. He's running some UFO program.
We think he lost his mind. He's giving the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence a hard time, and this was 6 months prior to that Leslie Clean and Ralph Blumenthal article in December 2017. And I was like, I don't know who this Lou guy is. He sounds crazy to me because I don't know about some UFO program. And but little did I know, about six 7 months after that, I saw that on the news and that's what caught my attention because I'm like, I heard about this guy, didn't realize that program was for real and it turns out it was.
And, and then, I spent a year kind of just doing like an open source lit review. And then in early 2019, just by happenstance, my boss forwarded me an email from the UAP Task Force director asking, hey, we need a rep From the NRO to help the task force, you got anybody? And, you know, my my boss knew I was a reservist and I was looking for something to do To put on my performance report, and, of course, I said yes, so because I figured, I'd figure out if it was something prosaic, like natural phenomena, If it's a blue US program that people are seeing that, you know, people think is a UFO, but it's not, or it's maybe some adversarial program That maybe our intelligence community, missed in their intelligence collection analysis. Yeah.
Speaker 0: So I went All fair guesses.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I went in proving a negative. I didn't I mean, I was open to the idea of, you know, nonhuman intelligence because, you know, as a guy got his bachelor's in physics, there's something called the Drake equation, Calculates the number of, potential civilizations in the, you know, the Milky Way based on certain factors, and people can Google that and play around with it. So I was open to it, but I didn't think that was going to be the answer.
Speaker 0: So so so you were detailed to this?
Speaker 2: I was. It was my official duty as an Air Force officer, and then eventually, When NGA hired me as a government civilian, the UAP portfolio came to myself and a few other individuals within our agency, to support the UAP task force initially, but of course, that office transitioned to the ARRW office, the, you know, Old domain anomaly resolution office.
Speaker 0: So you'd, by this point, worked in the government for a long time?
Speaker 2: Yeah. I did. Yeah. I mean, become my cadet time in uniform. I've, you know, been in uniform, you know, 18 years.
Speaker 0: So how is this different?
Speaker 2: This was different because I started to uncover, you know, some very disturbing Facts. I had people come to me. I had access to the classified, archives from those previous UFO programs that Lou Elizondo and others ran Years prior and, you know, I saw I read some extremely interesting foreign intelligence that was derived by You know, clandestine human sources overseas espousing, and this is, you know, something they're And noting about the US, they're like, yeah, the US has a retrieval program, reverse engineering program, and I'm like, woah, woah, woah,
Speaker 0: woah, woah. This was the assessment of
Speaker 2: Other countries, yeah. And I and by the way, I ran all this through DOD security and pre publication review, mind you, so anything I say in detail, I'm I'm a steward of security. I care about national security, and I would never want to say something publicly, that would, you know, hamper national security. Just to put that out there.
Speaker 0: But but what an interesting way to find out. You're reading the assessment of countries that are spying on us, and we've spied on their assessments of us.
Speaker 2: Yes. And, I had a chain of custody on how we got that information and, you know, I thought maybe, oh, this is passage material. We got to be Careful which passage material would be like a form of disinformation to try to trick a case officer to develop a, you know, relationship with said asset. So I I was like, wait a minute, is this true? It a certain adversary of ours thinks, apparently, this is true.
And you know, one thing led to another And, you know, I did talk to extremely, extremely, you know, senior officials, both former directors of certain agencies. I had the privilege of having relationship with them, and I talked to them about this issue, and they confirmed those details. And what was really interesting In the previous UFO program's records, so the AUSAP program, which ran roughly 2008 to 2010 or so. And that was in the Defense Intelligence Agency, and this is, this has been released by FOIA. You can actually go to DIA's website and And read this, but, the the paperwork included this very odd request from senator Harry Reid.
He sent a letter to the Deputy Secretary of Defense asking for something called a provisional special access program or PSAP. I've never seen in my career a member of Congress ask the Department of Defense to develop a very classified program. Usually, it's the reverse, Right. Congress wants more transparency and reclassification. Look, this is very odd.
I don't I don't know what's going on here. Why is Harry Reid Saying that the OSAP program found something they needed to develop this, provisional special access program that is Waived and bigoted, which is the most serious of SAPs, waived means it's limited congressionally reported. That's 10 U. S. Code Section 119 And bigoted means it's like by name.
And there was a list of individuals that needed to be briefed, of course, Senator Reed, Inouye and a couple, you know, members of Gang of 8, wanted to be on it. And so I asked people that both worked on that program, But also people that were tangential to it that worked in certain intelligence agencies. So what was this about? Well, you know, a certain clear defense contractor wanted to transfer some of their material holdings to DIA for our program. It was all crash Retrieval material, and this was a way to horizontally protect, as we call it, that information and that physical material, from a certain other government program and custodian that lent that that contractor material in the past.
And I was like, wait, are you you saying we have UFO material? That's crazy. Are you sure it's UFO material? Like, this isn't like we we went and got a wreckage of a Russian bomber and it just happened to be weird or Something like that. And now they were dead serious.
So I mean, what was
Speaker 0: their sort of tone or effect when they said like, of course or
Speaker 2: Well, they certainly, I guess they're a little bit jaded and, you know, the reality to them is not shocking, but I was So intrigued by this, not only did I interview 10 people that were in the meetings that, you know, talked to the Clear Defense contractor, we're involved in trying to persuade the government customer to release custodianship to give it, ultimately to DIA and Bigelow Aerospace. I actually flew, to Las Vegas and I actually met with Senator Harry Reid himself after he retired. Of course, you know, the former majority leader, and I wanted to hear it right from his mouth. He had
Speaker 0: a longtime interest in this topic.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And, you know, he confirmed that to me. He's like, yes, I was told This clear defense contractor had material. This is the way to get it, and, you know, he told me that he he knew that contractor had material for decades. However, The Pentagon has always denied him access to actually go see that and he literally told me that in his living room To my face, and, he ultimately made that disclosure to the New Yorker.
Speaker 0: If I could just ask you to pause. Yeah. How could the Pentagon, which has no authority of any kind except to the extent it serves elected officials. It's not its own country. Yeah.
They're they're just employees like your housekeeper. They work for politicians who are elected by the people. How can they deny an elected official access to something?
Speaker 2: Yeah and that's part of why I whistleblower this Constitutional branch of government
Speaker 0: Thank you. Exactly.
Speaker 2: So and and and elected leaders, even in the normal black pro SAP Community, they're treated as second class citizens. Oh, we're gonna waive reporting. I'm depsec def. I can sign an order saying we're not gonna fully brief Certain committees on programs. That is in public law, tenuous code section 119, And that is congressional oversight of SAPS is the title of that part of public law.
But the Department, which I find, You know, in retrospect, very weird where you, you know, the legislators authorize and appropriate these programs, But they're not afforded full access, and occasionally Gang of 8 will get those kind of briefings, but but literally, they could withhold, you know, besides notifying a program got stood up, the entire congress that we're doing some kind of clandestine activity.
Speaker 0: It's almost unbelievable. I mean, they they have no moral authority to do that, of course, under our constitution.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And, you know, and and I'm I'm
Speaker 0: not up in this because it's the least interesting part but it is I think significant. What about the executive? Do you believe they withheld Information from sitting president?
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's funny you asked that. So the executive was initially involved in The secrecy on the UAP topic, they transposed the Manhattan Project secrecy construct onto this, Eventually, and then they formed, you know, the Atomic Energy Act, what was McMahon Act of 46, the Atomic Energy Act of 54, And they purposely diluted the definition of like special nuclear material. If you actually read section 51 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, it says, You know, besides normal nuclear material, we can also protect stuff that is similar and it's a very like broad definition And that's basically the justification of the secrecy on this topic is the material that we recover sometimes does have radioactive properties. And so where, you know, they legally and gymnastically, you know, twisted the public law to justify the secrecy.
Speaker 0: I have so many questions for you, and I'm getting in the way of your narrative, which is terrific. Thank you. So before I interrupted you, you were saying so you All of a sudden realized this is real. Mhmm. And then it sounds like you said you interviewed 10 people.
It sounds like you decided to find out as much
Speaker 2: Yeah. We interviewed roughly 40 people, many of which, you know, had firsthand knowledge. Like I said, you know, I we were privileged To interview, you know, people at the same kind of level as as Harry Reid, for example. And, you know, Harry was just so concerned about this, topic. You know, when I left the meeting with him, he said he was gonna go talk to President Biden.
Him and President Biden had like a weekly call And this is about 9 months before his death. Certainly his mind was sharp, but, you know, he was struggling with his health issues. For sure. But, you know, he was so concerned about our conversation, which was unclassified because I was in his living room. But he was gonna go talk to the president because he understood stood that even himself as a Gang of Eight member and the majority leader, for goodness sakes, was denied access.
And going back to your earlier question about presidents, You know, many administrations ago, a lot of the presidents were in the know, right. However, it's vacillated over the years where certain chief executives necessarily briefed all aspects of the program. So you have, you know, commander in chief is also our chief diplomat and they do need to know, if there is a foreign entity, adversary, friend, whatever, out there so they can form, foreign policy for the country. But when you are not telling it's like classifying the existence of Russia.
Speaker 0: It's like but it's also they have no moral authority to do it. They have no authority to even have their jobs without the authority that comes from the votes of the population through the elected officials. So like this,
Speaker 2: Well, that's the issue you have. It's a symptom of the overclassification of this whole secret national security state that was formed in 1947 And, they're basically classifying basic physics, basic astrobiology, that kind of stuff, and that's, Do we classify nuclear physics? No. You can study at a university.
Speaker 0: So let's, since I keep interrupting, let's just go to the beginning. Tell us what you know about the genesis of this. You I'll start with the most obvious question, which is you said the secrecy surrounding these programs derived from the secrecy surrounding the Manhattan Project. Is there any connection between the 2?
Speaker 2: Not overtly, but certainly during the Manhattan Project.
Speaker 0: No, let me be more specific. Do you think that the development of nuclear Weapons was derived anyway from technology, from these No, no, no, no. But I think That was totally independent.
Speaker 2: But I think it might have precipitated Interest from, you know
Speaker 0: From these objects.
Speaker 2: From these objects, yes.
Speaker 0: Okay. So, the most famous, obviously, Roswell 1947, You know?
Speaker 2: Yeah. I can't talk about many retrievals. The only one I've stated publicly is the 1933 Italian event. So
Speaker 0: tell us what that is.
Speaker 2: So I picked that event, specifically because it was not U. S. Centric And I wanted to espouse that this is a worldwide problem, not just a US centric problem. So that was a, you know, recovery of an artifact By the Axis powers Italy and Germany and Magenta, Italy in 1933. Much of that information, ironically, was in the public vernacular Starting in the early 2000, there were certain researchers at Italy that uncovered these documents that Mussolini sent To the Gestapo or the Italian equivalent of the Gestapo and and, otherwise.
However, that was one specific A recovery that was briefed to me by a senior intelligence officer. Well, I
Speaker 0: mean, since it was, you know, 90 years ago and in Fascist Italy, I think we can we're safe in telling what we know, correct? So, like what happened?
Speaker 2: So, you know, they recovered this object. It looked like an acorn and the intelligence officer that briefed me and, we'll just say, senior officials On Capitol Hill, during a certain private session, described how the edges of this, It was like a lenticular disk looking thing, but the edges broke off when it hit the earth. So it looked like an acorn or like a bell shape, when they recovered it, it was just an artifact. They didn't find anything with it. And, you know, the Italians kept custody of that Towards the end of the war and then, you know, the Americans came in and recovered it.
And we knew about it because it turns out the Vatican through Pope Pius the 12th And the OSS, they sent a communique back to FDR saying, hey, we got something kind of weird that, you know, crashed in Italy. And, you know, so this this history is longer than most people think. It is not those, Seminole events that, you know, you may have mentioned to me, but it actually goes back much farther. And I wanted to use 1933 as an example Not only to garner international interest, but to, you know, explain that this is, you know, a longer activity than than most people think.
Speaker 0: So but what you're saying is even, You know, Italy falls in 1945, the Muslim government, and the US army military swoops in and takes this. Yes. And then it disappears behind the veil of secrecy. Mhmm. Why?
So they were secretive about it even then. Yeah. How come?
Speaker 2: Well, it was one of those things. It's like a Pandora's box, Right. If you could analyze it and garner some kind of information from it, from like a reverse engineering perspective, it may give you like an ace in the hole, Asymmetric advantage over your adversary and, well, we want to figure this out. We don't know if Russia's ever found any of this stuff, you know, at the time. And, is this and of course, they didn't know the origin of it.
We they just wanted to make sure it wasn't one of our adversaries, so they spent years looking at it And developing an intelligence infrastructure to figure out what was going on.
Speaker 0: So that's the is that the first that you know of?
Speaker 2: No, but that was one of the ones I ran through DOD security and
Speaker 0: So you believe they're earlier incidents?
Speaker 2: I want to add, I don't want to comment either way. Yeah, there's, I know about many other events, but however, those, that's the only one that I've cleared through security.
Speaker 0: Okay. But you can say for at least This 80 years, the US government has
Speaker 2: Yeah. At least from 1933 was at about 90 or so, if I'm doing the math right.
Speaker 0: Well, you said the US government tend to take custody till the end of
Speaker 2: That particular one, yes.
Speaker 0: Okay. But you are saying the US government had knowledge in in the thirties?
Speaker 2: They were aware of the issue back then. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Wow stupid question but one that keeps occurring to me Why would advanced technology like this crash so often?
Speaker 2: Yeah. People ask that. I think one of the the tropes that a lot of skeptics Put out like, oh, it traveled so far. Why did it crash? Did it crash by accident or on purpose?
And there's something called the concept of Von Neumann Replicating probes, which you can, you know, Google that. You know, a physicist postulated that if you're advanced, you might have throwaway Probes. I mean, think of like the Voyager spacecraft, for example, right? Well, we don't care what the disposition is at the end. We just wanted to go as far as possible.
So the crashes aren't necessarily on purpose and I'm not just saying that as my own personal theory. You know, I talked to scientists That were on this program and this was one of their legitimate theories that, you know, that is a possibility.
Speaker 0: But you say these subjects came from so far. Do we know that? Well, that's
Speaker 2: the thing is you don't really know the origin. You know, people, even certain directors of government agencies we talked to about this issue and they were Well aware of this program, you know, they like to use the term extraterrestrial, but I'm a little skeptical about that. That's why, you know, I like I used the term NHI, and that also is nonhuman intelligence, and that is also a term that Chuck Schumer, in the Schumer Amendment, you know, so Chuck Schumer, Senator Gillibrand, Rubio, Rounds, and Young, proposed an act called the UAP Disclosure Act of 2023. It's an amendment within the fiscal year 24 National Defense Authorization Act, 67 pages, publicly available. It is currently in conference right now And they use the term non human intelligence, biologics, so, I'm not the only one using those terms.
That is, The majority leader, Chuck Schumer, who by the way was friends with Harry Reid, and other notable senators are also pushing for transparency in this matter.
Speaker 0: Is there any evidence that these objects are coming from far away through space into our atmosphere?
Speaker 2: That touches some sensitive natural technical capabilities I can't Cross. But
Speaker 0: Sounds like there's some suggestion they're coming from under the ocean.
Speaker 2: I think it's a multidomain issue. And, there are A bunch of potential origins that are based either in physics theory or biological theory. And, you know, I'm open to all possibilities.
Speaker 0: Is it known so far as you know where they come from?
Speaker 2: There are reasonably confident theories. However, I have not seen all the data and and I don't always, you know, trust everything certain interview subjects espouse because I might have, like, an intellectual Or data analytical kind of difference in opinion. So, but I do encourage the President, and through this Act, Make, you know, all data as it relates to origin, you know, transparent to the American people.
Speaker 0: Well, that's I mean, if if if you can't even say it now
Speaker 2: Mhmm.
Speaker 0: There's a and I want to get into that, like why the secrecy, actually.
Speaker 2: Well, that's the problem is it's actually hindering national security by keeping it so tight because you don't have Broad industrial base and broad academic study. So, just like nuclear physics, you can go and get a PhD in it. You can read about it. You can study it. How you build nuclear weapons, that's classified and that's fine.
I just want the subject to basically be horizontally protected like nuclear Secrets, like true nuclear secrets, where the broad study of which should be open to the public and anything that is really, Dangerous to release because of weaponization or something. Keep that classified, but 95% should be open to study throughout the
Speaker 0: world especially since it sounds pretty clear that the U. S. Government's been in contact with whatever these are You wouldn't confirm or deny that in your congressional testimony. It seems very clear to me. And I won't ask you because you already have an answer, but That's being done in the name of the U.
S. Taxpayer of citizens of voters and at some point they have a right to know that Like, I don't I can't imagine what the justification for keeping that from the public, who you work for,
Speaker 2: could what could that be? Yeah. I think it's an abuse. You know, so executive order 13,526, if you read that, delineates the 8 reasons you classify information. And the only thing that this falls under is, you know, Scientific and technical information that has national security implications is is boilerplate, and it's really just an abuse At this point, and we're overclassifying things out of fear of the socioeconomic, theological, And counterintelligence implications because I remember talking to, a former director of a three letter agency that we happen Trudeau personally and we met with.
And, you know, that former director's biggest issue was the counterintelligence implications. We can't let Russia and China Figure this. Okay. I get that. I used to work counterintelligence to protect U.
S. Programs in a previous job, when I was a young Air Force officer, But there's got to be a middle grounds and not, oh, well, we don't know what to do, so we're just going to keep everything unacknowledged. It's ridiculous.
Speaker 0: But it also suggests that there's more going on here. I mean, in your own life or my life, the life any person, the things that you hide, the things you try to keep secret the most assiduously are the things you're most embarrassed about.
Speaker 2: That is true. So there was a recent administration that had an informal, off-site meeting. And I talked to multiple individuals that were in this in person meeting, with, we'll just say, National Security Council staff of this former administration. And one of the biggest issues that they raised was white collar crime, illegal contracting. So there's something called the Federal Acquisition Regulation, the FAR.
And if you only give a couple contractors full access for decades of this stuff And you don't let other contractors compete for work, for money. You're giving, certain companies an unfair competitive advantage, that violates literal U. S. Law. So it's, you know, we're not going to release anything because then we have to deal.
And I remember These individuals telling me they were worried that contractors would sue the U. S. Government and it would be litigated to the Supreme Court. Well, we're out of 1,000,000,000 of dollars because you sole sourced it to these couple companies. Of course.
Speaker 0: Well, but and there are darker explanations.
Speaker 2: And there's darker things, I'm sure, but but some of the most Obvious ones that they told me were very rudimentary and it's like, well, yeah. Well, I'm sorry you guys did that. And and let's be clear, I'm not here to admonish The entire US government, I mean, I know a lot of good people. I would have to think I was a good person, a good, you know, intelligence officer.
Speaker 0: Well, I I'm the son of a federal employee. I you don't need to convince me. I know.
Speaker 2: So I'm not here to overly admonish everybody. I think there needs to be, you know, a, Called a truth and reconciliation process. You know, we're not here to shackle people. We're not here to get people necessarily in Trouble unless they did something grossly illegal and immoral and unethical. And I suspect based on people I talk to, there is going to be limited situations where People are going to be found, culpable in that.
But I'm here. You know, it's time to reconcile this. We need to heal from this. You know, we need to disclose the basics. The fact that we're we're not alone.
We've recovered material And we've recovered the occupants. And beyond that, you know, the president can decide what should be disclosed. It's above my pay grade, But the the basics should be acknowledged. And I think it's a more ontologically shocking, but also uniting Thing in an era of divisiveness, I think we need
Speaker 0: to agree with that.
Speaker 2: I mean, what else is gonna unite the left, the right, And potentially our adversaries, I mean, you saw the hearing that you played the clip, I had AOC and Matt Gaetz agreeing on something in the same room And not arguing. It was crazy. So this topic, I think, is maybe we're at a point in our, you know, our society, Especially the the decay we've seen over the last 30 years and the divisiveness rather whether you're on the left or on the right, this is the one topic that I think can basically be a reset button.
Speaker 0: So can you just give us a sense of the scale of these recoveries? It's like 3 or is it
Speaker 2: It is double digit and I've mentioned that publicly. I am familiar with the exact numbers. We had multiple intel officers brief us on all the numbers and Where went one warehouse?
Speaker 0: Where is all the stuff kept? I mean, I assume that
Speaker 2: I do know of some specific locations.
Speaker 0: The Boeing Raytheon warehouse.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I mean, Harry Reid knew about one specific location, and that was the material that he was denied access to.
Speaker 0: Why didn't he show up with armed guards and demand to see it? I don't understand. Everyone's so passive. Yeah. You're the Senate majority leader.
Show it to me now.
Speaker 2: Yeah. You would think that there's some kind of enforcement tactic he could use. He didn't Expels anything else besides they he was trying to get access administratively by sponsoring that special access program.
Speaker 0: So that kind of raises An interesting and having spent my life in Washington you know you hear this stuff you don't really know if it's true you know about Unauthorized and dark things going on in the United States to people who tell its secrets. But it does raise the question, like, why you? It's been going on for, well, you said, I guess, 90 years at least. You're suggesting longer, actually, but certainly most of the century, and No one's really come forward. Like, why is that?
Speaker 2: Yeah. I mean, there there have been other people that have come forward. Certainly was more stigmatized in the past. Why me? I was just a guy in the right place in the right time.
I happened to be ultra cleared in the DoD and IC at the time and I generally knew who to talk To where the skeletons were for other US activities and But what's your motive? My motive really is just, you know, Air Force core values, you know, service before self, Integrity first, and and I just did not want to, you know, look back 30 years from now and be like, hush. I've done something when this topic was, you know, acceptable in Congress. We had all this momentum. I just did not want to live out my life keeping a secret like these other, gentlemen and ladies that came to me and my group on the UAP Task Force because they wanted a change.
You know, some of them were in tears because they were threatened Over the years and Threatened by whom? Both the program because you can imagine, hey, we're gonna read you in. This is treason. You will go to the Leavenworth And, you know, you'll be executed if you ever, you know, divulge these secrets, right? So they were intimidated.
Speaker 0: Have fun at trial.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Well, The judicial process doesn't work quite the same on that program, but that's sensitivity.
Speaker 0: They don't have the constitution in place. Why doesn't someone just tear down the U. S. Government? This is so rotten that it's kind of hard to believe it's actually in existence.
Speaker 2: I know. I lost a lot of sleep on this. But when I started getting attacked on the inside And the reprisal started happening for 3 years. You know, I knew I was over the target, so to speak. You take fire when you're over the target, as we say in the Air Force, And it just got so crazy.
I had 3 agencies investigate me at the same time. Somehow Which ones? Don't want to say because there's an ongoing reprisal investigation on my behalf by the inspector general to look in into all this that's going on. So I don't want to compromise that investigation by saying too many details. But I was investigated by 3 agencies at once.
They tried to dig up anything they could find on me. They tried to use, mental health issues I reported in my past. I've been in Afghanistan. I got PTSD. I have a VA disability rating because of that.
I had a friend that blew up. I had a friend that had killed himself And, you know, that impacted me when I was a younger guy in my twenties, but I got help. No problem. I maintained my clearance, but they dug up stuff From almost a decade ago saying, oh, he has, you know, ongoing issues, that kind of thing. And certainly was not the case.
I was taking care of myself. You know, I have High functioning autism and, you know, and I had to learn how to manage my emotions and got help, maintained my clearance. So when that didn't work, they just made up stuff. And it turns out I found out after the fact, I was under criminal investigation for 4 months. I was never interviewed.
I didn't even know what it was about. But then I found out afterwards when they, you know, tried to use that to revoke my clearance. Now, mind you, you know, I have a good attorney, the former inspector general, And, you know, we litigated that, we rebutted that, and, you know, everything was, I was cleared of any wrongdoing. I maintained my clearance, you know, I resigned from NGA with my Clearance eligibility intact, but I even FOIA ed that agency who put me under criminal investigation And I got a denial of my whole file citing something called like a B7 alpha FOIA exemption, which means we could compromise a law enforcement investigation. But they wouldn't even give me anything, not even redacted papers.
They just gave me a denial letter, and I'm like, okay. So you said I did something bad, which wasn't even true. You never interviewed me and you were trying to use that information to fire me. That's crazy. And luckily, you know, there is an open investigation to look at this kind of wrongdoing, and that's one of the reasons I went public.
I'm a patriot. I shouldn't be treated like this. Of course not. If there was a sensitive program I uncovered, come to the table with me. Tell me, knock it off, Dave.
Sign this piece.
Speaker 0: But where's everybody else? And where's everyone else been for the last 90 years? I know so outrageous that it suggests to me that the threats, the ones you alluded to, are real. People are afraid
Speaker 2: of being hurt. And luckily, people are coming out. So remember the DIA AUSET program I mentioned earlier. So a man named Doctor. James Katzie ran it.
He's a PhD level, former DIA officer, now retired. So he wrote 2 books. 1 is called Skinwalkers at the Pentagon And on page 152 to 153, if anybody's watching and happens to have the book, you'll note that they talked about a sequester technology and they were trying to get access Says to it, well, that's what I just told you earlier in this interview is Harry Reid was literally trying to get them access to that technology and and people are like, Oh, well, Harry was funding some paranormal program. They were looking at Skinwalker Ranch. It was some woo woo thing.
I'm like, well, the real story is The 21 or $22,000,000 appropriated was meant to set up material analysis equipments At, a Bigelow Aerospace facility to look at the material that a clear defense contractor was supposed to transfer to them. But when that ended, They ended up doing other stuff with that money because, well, they wanted to study this phenomenon in some way, shape, or form, so they looked at some of the more, You know, paranormal aspects, if you will. I've never been to Skinwalker Ranch in Utah, but, you know, allegedly, things are going on out there. And then they wrote these, documents called Defense Intelligence Reference documents in lieu of what that the core reason for that money. So a lot of Naysayers, in social media, oh, Harry Reid, he was just into the paranormal and and he wanted to study, you know, Skinwalker Ranch and ghosts.
That's not entirely accurate. There was a real reason for it.
Speaker 0: No. But I'm just saying what they're doing is what it sounds like they Did you, which is try to discredit you by calling you a nut?
Speaker 2: Yeah. And 1 week after the congressional hearing, there was a hit piece on The Intercept. Somebody verbally tipped off that reporter and he admitted it on an interview on the Hill, and he FOIA ed for some records that pointed towards, You know, some, you know, struggles I had several years ago where I, you know, checked myself in because I was feeling depressed at a hospital and, you know, I'm not ashamed of that. You know, A lot of veterans go through that, but it was very interesting, 1 week after the hearing, this hit piece comes out of the intercept, Killing the messenger, but not the message, you know, saying I'm crazy. I have mental problems.
And
Speaker 0: it was kind
Speaker 2: of crazy.
Speaker 0: Why would why would an intercept reporter do that.
Speaker 2: You would think because, weren't they pro whistleblower? Didn't Glenn Greenwald create them to actually support whistleblowers?
Speaker 0: And if some, you know, A high level bureaucrat comes to you to, you know, crush a subordinate you because he's revealing things that public really has a right to know you think the reporters who actually, I want to hear more about the program. What is this? Do you have UFOs or don't you?
Speaker 2: Yeah. It's like, why don't you actually look into it? It's very lazy journalism and there's very few investigative journalists and I'm sure you know this that even exists anymore.
Speaker 0: I'm very aware of it. And yes I'm very aware of that but I just want to get back to like the core of what's going on here. It doesn't actually add up. So the idea is that For 90 years, we've been collecting the stuff, monitoring it, studying it in order to improve military technology to give us an edge and ace in the hole as you said.
Speaker 2: Yeah. There there were certainly good breakthroughs that I'm aware of that did help certain, black programs that are conventional in nature. And I understand that.
Speaker 0: Can you be more detailed than any of that?
Speaker 2: No, I can't.
Speaker 0: And a
Speaker 2: lot of those programs are still classified. Right.
Speaker 0: Well, that's kind of the point I'm making. A lot of these programs are So old that no person participated in them is still alive.
Speaker 2: No. That was the issue is I I had to find some of the old timers before they died because There's a brain drain. I have there's a senior intelligence officer that's currently on the program that, you know, told us that They have they struggle hiring even the right technical people because of the obtuse security. Imagine the best person in quantum gravity smokes marijuana. Are they getting a TS clearance?
No. So they can't even bring in the right people. And once again, like you just said, a lot of the Breakthroughs have not matriculated into civil society for the most part, and in an era of climate change and other things going on, you know, and we can debate the genesis thereof. But this is the time to bring it out because it's gonna take 20, 30 years to commercialize anything anyways
Speaker 0: but it does suggest that there's something more going on here it suggests that the US government They've kept the Kennedy assassination files thousands of pages classified for 60 years this month because the CIA of course, he was in contact with Oswald and had knowledge of the conspiracy to kill Kennedy. I'm not speculating. I talked to someone who read the documents. So they have hidden those documents in order to check themselves from public scrutiny of their own illegal, immoral behavior. I'm kinda be surprised if something similar is not going on here.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I mean, there's a famous quote. There's a John Stossel interview where he interviews Mike Pompeo about 2 or 3 years ago where, interesting, he makes a weird very odd Insequeter, after he discusses the JFK files ironically, and he says, if I get this quote correctly, I've seen the UFO file. We have bigger problems is what, you know, the former CIA director says to John Stossel in a taped interview. And If you even go back, most people don't know this, there's a taped interview from senator Barry Goldwater in the late eighties.
He was famously A 2 star general in the Air Force Reserve, but of Goldwater Nichols Act famed in in the eighties. And there's an interview of him, which you can YouTube, if you like, that's, he phoned General Curtis LeMay many years ago and asked, hey, I heard there's a room where you keep all this UFO material. Can I have access? And General LeMay basically chewed out Senator Goldwater, who was, I think Gang of 8 member at the time, and denied him access. So there's something wrong when, you know, certain people like that, Try to dig into it.
Speaker 0: But right. But there's a reason that they're keeping it secret.
Speaker 2: There may be other reasons. I don't claim to be omnipotent and know all the issues and that's why I'm not here to disclose, this should be the president of United States and his cabinet, because There may be issues that I'm not even aware of that may precipitate a certain form of acknowledgement or disclosure. I do agree. There is probably something darker and deeper and more disturbing, and I, you know, I did see inklings of that When I did interview, so many people of high caliber.
Speaker 0: So what is the truth about these claims of abduction?
Speaker 2: I don't know. Nobody I interviewed Had any firsthand knowledge on that phenomenon. I certainly believe people have experienced stuff like that. At least they believe it because you look at, doctor John Mack, who's a Harvard trained psychologist and psychiatrist, you know, looked at The phenomenon of abduction in the nineties and early 2000s before his death. And he affirmed that the people he, psychoanalyze certainly experienced something real to them.
But what is the abduction phenomenon? I really don't know. I'm not sure.
Speaker 0: Are are you is there any indication the US government has studied this?
Speaker 2: I would imagine that a part of the program that I uncovered Probably would have analyzed that situation because it is it is data, data, even if it's, you know, oral testimony data, but I really don't know Do you think anything about it?
Speaker 0: Do you think, and I've read a couple, not just this country but others, former government officials saying they believe there's some There's a spiritual connection to these things.
Speaker 2: Well, I think, you know, if you were to back out to the 100,000 foot level, There certainly is a phenomenon. And and how do we quantify that? Well, theologically, we can quantify that as, you know, angels, demons, that Kind of thing. You know, many people with religious belief systems espouse faith in that regard, and they believe that a phenomenon exists. And really, what we're seeing here with the UFO UAP subject is probably just another facet of that same phenomenon.
So I think this is not something that's gonna destroy I mean, even the Vatican chief astronomer in 2009 or 2010 said the Vatican's okay with, nonhuman intelligence? It doesn't hurt Catholic theology,
Speaker 0: so The Vatican maintains an observatory, I think.
Speaker 2: They do. Yes. Yes.
Speaker 0: In the United States?
Speaker 2: I believe it is in the Rome area, but I'm not I'm not an expert on the Vatican. Okay.
Speaker 0: I mean, of course be mistaken. I'm not either. Do other countries have these materials?
Speaker 2: Well, what I said in my initial interview with NewsNation is that it Ultimately became a Cold War arms race sub rose under the noise floor. And, other countries Do you have their own programs? And I can't get into those details because that's something I did not put through security review. However, I will point out, like, the South China Morning Post in June 2021 put out an article saying, oh, yeah, we have a UAP task force too and we're using artificial intelligence to Analyze UAPs. But other than that public announcement, you know, our adversaries have kept their mouth shut on this issue for the most part.
Speaker 0: You know, technology, aircraft technology has not actually progressed very far. No. We've plateaued many, many, many years.
Speaker 2: Bypass turbofan was designed, I think, by Henkel in the late thirties.
Speaker 0: Exactly.
Speaker 2: And, and that's also my issue, right? You know, you know, I'm, you know, I'm 36. I represent kind of the under 40 generation. Well, where's our asymptote leap? Where's the next Propulsion and we're stuck you know, if people care about, you know, carbon neutrality and green energy, well, If we have something that's only being studied for military purposes that may, you know, unlock the next level of either energy, propulsion, whatever, I don't know.
We should be openly studying at this point because look what's happening to the planet.
Speaker 0: Okay. So but so that suggests what? That military contractors are incompetent, that it's so compartmentalized it can't but our military aircraft haven't you know, progressed to some crazy level either.
Speaker 2: Obviously, at least, based on what the public knows. However, You know, we've had multistar generals that we talked to as well, both current and former, that, you know, said that this, you know, program is just, You know, the wild, wild west in some sense, where there's all these silos of activity, there's no monolithic, You know, director of all these activities, and it just became this uncontrolled, unmanaged black abyss. I'm looking into this and That's so disjointed, the people aren't even talking to each other and it's very similar to the special access programs I saw. So this is really not That's shocking to me. I mean, there were times where I was working on a certain intelligence community program that's compartmented And they're like and I see what they're doing.
I'm like, you do know the DOD already has that, right? And then I would have to get them cross briefed. And this is just a symptom of that same ecosystem.
Speaker 0: Yeah. We've seen this for a long
Speaker 2: time.
Speaker 0: It's just too big.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Well, the Department of Defense, I saw their audit came out yesterday And they couldn't account for 50% of their assets. And, their financial
Speaker 0: Try that on your tax return.
Speaker 2: Well, their financial management system has been on Yeah. It's been on the GAO's watch since 1995 and the, I think I read in the article in The Hill, they spend $5,000,000,000 a year on financial management software? Okay. Well, like, so when I when I hear, like, well, the the SecDef doesn't know anything about a program, well, you can't even account for $3,800,000,000,000 of your own assets. So how do you know what the department actually has without ordering an investigation?
Speaker 0: No. That's exactly right.
Speaker 2: At what point will this become public? So I'm glad you asked that. So, I mentioned the Schumer amendments, UAP Disclosure Act of 23, it's currently in conference. It's part of the fiscal year 24 National Defense Authorization Act, which is what funds the DOD and IC. But right now, it's in a perilous position because, as I'm told by staffers on the Hill, the House Armed Services and Intelligence Committees Are trying to block it, specifically Mike Rogers and Mike Turner.
They believe it's duplicative. It's not going to assist Arrow in any way. However, Having Mike Rogers
Speaker 0: and Mike Turner.
Speaker 2: The Mike's. And and the thing is, is this provides Some
Speaker 0: of the dumbest people in Washington. So It's pure tools of the national
Speaker 2: security system. So it helps them give top cover. It helps them declassify things. And, you know, Mike Turner, You know who his biggest donors are. And he represents, you know, the Wright Patterson Air Force Base District.
And his biggest donors are Lockheed, Raytheon and Boeing.
Speaker 0: He's a shameful career.
Speaker 2: Well, it's very interesting because his committee, the House Intel Committee, is precisely the committee I gave multiple hours of classified testimony to last year. But Mike Turner seems to just go on Fox Business after the congressional hearing and say, And he doesn't use my name, but he says the whistleblower doesn't know what he's talking about, nothing to see here. I'm like, really, Mike Turner? The mayor of Dayton for many years, were you ever in the intelligence community? Were you ever a military officer?
Have you ever handled special access program material For 14 years? Oh, I have. And why didn't you call me into your office if you thought my testimony was incomplete? I mean, the guy shouldn't even be reelected. No.
And did you know that Mike Turner is trying to, hurt Tim Burchett's reelection in Tennessee? He's trying to fund an opposing candidate Because Tim Burchette is one of the leading Republican UAP proponents in the house, he's taken it upon himself not only to try to block the Schumer amendments, Ruin representative Burchette's reelection chances because he's speaking out too much about this issue, and he is, basically defaming me and discrediting me on national TV, when, I'm sorry, Representative Turner, you have no idea what we're talking about. And if you want me to
Speaker 0: But he probably does. He's
Speaker 2: Or he does. Or he's
Speaker 0: carrying water for people who don't want the public to know what
Speaker 2: to do. And Lockheed has his ear. So I'm a private citizen. I can be critical of my elected officials. And I encourage, their constituents, both Mike Rogers and Mike Turner, But call their offices and say, no.
We do not want this bill to be blocked because if this bill gets signed into law, president Biden signs this. And, oh, by the way, the White House is okay with this amendment. You don't think Chuck Schumer called the president or national security adviser before proposing this legislation? Of course, he did. Right.
And this allows a, basically, a 6 year process because it forms a panel of experts, a 9 person panel. There's an economist, a scientist, a lawyer. I mean, it's what you would expect. And this was modeled off the JFK Records Act Of a 92, I believe.
Speaker 0: The one they keep ignoring.
Speaker 2: The one they keep ignoring. But we added some teeth to it to try to, you know, get this, all the way through, And this sets up a presidential panel and associated agency to assist ARO and other parts of the executive branch to come up with A literal disclosure plan. And I encourage people to read the amendment. It is obvious if you read it, we're talking about Nonhuman technology, nonhuman biologics, and we're talking about disclosure of these facts In an honest way by the chief executive, if this passes. So if this doesn't pass, I mean, this is probably the most important law in US history, let's be real.
And if this doesn't pass, if it's successfully blocked by the house, I mean, it's a total disgusting
Speaker 0: Well, it's also I mean, we're bumping up against criminal behavior at some point. So it's like, why wouldn't people just do what generations of whistleblowers have done and just leak the material to the public?
Speaker 2: I never wanted to be like that. I always follow the rules. I color in the lines. Anything I talk about publicly that's sensitive, I literally make sure I can say that from a security perspective. Just think about it.
There are foreign intelligence services watching this interview right now. I am not here to hurt national security. However, I am here as a Back witness because we have an oversight issue and I want things to change. My generation wants things to change. And For all the reasons I've enumerated earlier.
Speaker 0: And they're self evident. I think they're self evident. So this this is a question about a topic that cannot be classified because it is illegal. But you have any reason to believe that the U. S.
Government has hurt or killed anybody connected to these programs, American citizens.
Speaker 2: There were concerns, like I stated during the hearing, of people, that have espoused that to me. And, of course, I brought some of those officers, to the inspector general, intelligence community inspector general, because I'm like, this is serious. And I'm like, here's here's Here's the law enforcement people you want to talk to because I'm hands off. If that's true, you need to look into it.
Speaker 0: The allegation was murder?
Speaker 2: Yes. And then physical harm. And I will say, while I won't get into the specifics, because it's part of my open investigation, you know, besides the administrative stuff, And I don't know, it's an unknown entity to me. I do not know who did this, but their displeasure in me was made known in my personal life And that, you know, it affected my wife and I, and I had to report that, to a certain counterintelligence element and a certain law enforcement element because Right before I filed my whistleblower complaint, you know, I felt that my life was in jeopardy. And that's what I was alluding to During the hearing because, you know, we'll just say if you, when you come home and you see something, you know, you made somebody unhappy.
And I, to this day, I don't know who it was. I don't think it was a foreign entity, but there is some element That I extremely angered and I don't say that flippantly. I said it very seriously because I thought my life was in danger.
Speaker 0: You can't get into details because it's part of the investigation. It's part
Speaker 2: of the investigation. At some point, I'm happy to talk about it publicly. And also, as they say in the intelligence business, you don't acknowledge your tail. So I don't want to acknowledge some other things I've I've noticed that maybe But
Speaker 0: it sounds like you believe you've been surveilled and threatened.
Speaker 2: Oh, 100%. It was obvious to me. And, you know, I mean, it was blatant, we'll just say, what I observed. And it was So concerning, I I had I ended up reporting it to the authorities, and and I asked my agency for certain protective measures. I can't get into that that detail, but I was certainly petrified.
And the, at the same time that those things were happening to me personally, they were happening at the same time to a certain other public figure, that is known to the world, we'll just say, And another former intelligence officer near my home as well. And it was some kind of, planned, Multi person intimidation, activity that was very disturbing, and I'll just leave it at that. But in so I I'm not doing this for fun. I'm serious. I'm doing this interview because this is protective for me.
I don't I don't wanna be anonymous. Of course. So I'm not here for attention. I don't even this is a nightmare to even be public. Right.
You know, I I'm used to working in a vault and briefing generals. This is Not me. I'm not a public communicator, although I'm trying. And that's why I'm doing a very
Speaker 0: good communicator.
Speaker 2: I appreciate it. But this is A serious subject with serious consequences. And I suffered a lot of serious consequences.
Speaker 0: So as you know, you've totally convinced me of your sincerity. There was a lot of whispering about your motives. This is an op. Why now? Why are we learning all this
Speaker 2: now? Yes. People think that I'm a part of some CIA SIOP or something like that. First of all, I've never signed any kind of paperwork to be a part of an operation in that regard. Unfortunately, There isn't a plan.
I'm not a part of a plan. I ended up becoming a leader of a of a faction of, you know, former government officials and current government officials would like change in a legal way. And, you know, I encourage, if there are people watching that Have participated in those programs. There are multiple legal avenues such as going to the ARO office, Going through the ICIG like I did, Intelligence Community Inspector General, or another cognizant Inspectors General, to legally provide this information.
Speaker 0: And there are also illegal but morally defensible avenues like coming on this show and I'd be delighted to host anyone who wants to tell the truth about what he's seen and there's no justification for hiding this that that's my evaluation. So I'd be happy to take that risk to have that person on. But it sounds like when so given your own experience, when people say to you, US government employees said to you, wow, someone was killed by the US government for talking about this or planning to talk about it. It sounds like you would have to take those claims seriously.
Speaker 2: I did. And I remember a very, very credible senior intelligence officer precisely made those allegations in front of Senior officials on Capitol Hill, I was in the room.
Speaker 0: Elected officials?
Speaker 2: Their staff, I'll just say. I don't want to get into details.
Speaker 0: Crazy I mean so it's like at that point if somebody says the US government killed an American citizen without a trial because he was going to tell the truth about something That's kind of when everything stops. You can't have that in a free country.
Speaker 2: I mean, I think people are just paralyzed in fear because that's a reality, and I remember the Certain professional staff members being very upset in the room and, I mean, they're rightly so, but, like, we need to do something about that because that's Not good. And most of the people that even I interviewed, I'm like, do you wanna go to the inspector general with me? And they're like, we'll back you up, but we don't want our name on any complaints because they were just living in
Speaker 0: Fear. So, like, for my whole life, you know, I'd never even thought UFOs were real until fairly recently.
Speaker 2: Me either. 4 years ago, I If you asked me 4 or 5 years ago if I thought UFOs are real, I would have laughed.
Speaker 0: I completely agree. But the conventional explanation for the US government among those who believed it was hiding These facts that can explanation for why was the government does want to so panic, does not admit weakness in the face of its adversaries, etcetera, etcetera. Those explanations do not account for the behavior you're describing. They're hiding something real that implicates them. And if they're talking to these entities, whatever they are, and I believe in the basis of evidence that the US government has made contact and has had continuous or at least sporadic, but over beer to beers contact.
You don't need to nod or shake your head but that is my belief based on talking to people like what is that.
Speaker 2: Yeah. If there's certainly, you know, a relationship that was cultivated with nonhuman intelligences, hypothetically, I guess, you know, to play off of what you just said, Good or bad, it's almost like we were afraid after 9/11. Dirty bombs, terrorists. Okay. Well, That's nature.
That's life. Yin and Yang in the universe. If there is malevolent nonhuman intelligences, okay, well, that's a fact of life. Don't hide it because what if the US populace needs to be prepared for something, something hypothetically?
Speaker 0: And it's also not their right to hide it because they don't own the government. Public does, actually.
Speaker 2: Exactly. And it's just, I understand the reasons at first, but like you said, I think it's just the moral decay And the decay in leadership. And once again, well, we don't want to admit we did all this stuff years ago.
Speaker 0: But also if the US government has had contact with These entities and again, it is my informed belief that the U. S. Government has had contact what are they talking about? What is that?
Speaker 2: Hey. I would like to know too. I mean, I grew up watching Star Trek. So I mean, I say that kind of, you know Yeah. Whimsically, but, like, Well, great.
I mean, of my generation under 40, that's like, we're not shocked. That's cool. Like, a Gen Z er who's Team would want to study physics if they found out this stuff was real. Yes. Like, this is how you boost STEM in this country, for goodness sakes.
I mean, this is like the most exciting, Yes. A little scary, but overall, it's exciting. I mean, nothing's happened. You know, we're still living. I'm able to talk about this and nothing's happening, you know, to the, you know, The world if you will.
So it's I think it's exciting for for young people and I think it's the right time to do this.
Speaker 0: Going back in history, I mean there, You know, there are all sorts of mysteries about history that we just can't explain even now. But it sounds like it would not be surprising to learn that people 1000 years ago had contact with these
Speaker 2: Yeah. I mean, you look at the works of Jacques Vallee, a famous researcher, his character was portrayed in as the French character in Close Encounters of the Third Kind by Steven Spielberg. That guy exists. His name is Jacques Mallet. And he has a PhD and he's a smart scientist, but looked at this and, there's a couple books, like Passport to Mongolia and some other stuff, I'm probably butchering the name, where he looked into antiquity, this phenomenon, some people say, oh, it's probably adversarial technology, etcetera.
We've been seeing the same stuff Since antiquity. And this should also potentially enforce stories in theological texts, say the Bible or whatever, That people actually saw Ezekiel Ezekiel's wheels as Tim Burschett has espoused publicly. Maybe that actually happened. Now, Unfortunately, you're you're you're bursting maybe a worldview or a bubble for some people, but it actually Ultimately, it might enforce people's belief systems because stories in the religious texts weren't fable allegory or whatever, They happened. And I'm not saying all of them did, but there might be evidence if we were openly and honestly studying the subject in more detail.
Amazing.
Speaker 0: Last question small question but there includes some connection between Nuclear weapons, nuclear energy, and the sightings of these things. I mean, they've been seen around the US military installations with nuclear. So what is that?
Speaker 2: Yeah. You wonder if the nuclear testing was almost like a beacon. You know, anybody observing from far distance like, woah, the the monkey has the Has discovered 10 to the 6 tons of TNT energy extraction. They're close. Maybe they're only an order of magnitude A way of energy extraction to develop technology that, maybe they have, you know, hypothetically.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 2: And it might have been just like a lighthouse, So we turned it on and now they became more interested. And it might be also a symptom of what we call collection bias, We're modern society. We were more calibrated to look for that kind of stuff because there was like sci fi movies in the 30s 40s and maybe people We're looking up more maybe. But certainly, there is some kind of nuclear connection. What does it mean?
I don't know. They're obviously performing some kind of, Reconnaissance, and surveillance of us as it relates to not only our nuclear weapons and nuclear facilities. If anybody wants to read a book called UFOs and Nukes by Robert Hastings, he spent 40 plus years looking at, interviewing Air Force missileers, other credible witnesses and, you know, very famous incident in 1967, Bob Salas, right?
Speaker 0: Shut down the base.
Speaker 2: Shut down the nukes And, you know, we should take those observers seriously. They're trained. They have clearances. They have their, you know, jobs on the line, You know, lying in that regard. And so there is a nuclear connection.
I encourage people to read that book, but what does it mean? I don't even know. No idea.
Speaker 0: Well you're a brave man and I'll be honest I know what to think because there's a lot of whispering about you but I think you're totally sincere and I really appreciate you're doing this.
@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe
BREAKING: CEO of IBM @ArvindKrishna on ALL STAFF CALL going on defense in response to insider tapes released by OMG He calls me a "journalist" and addresses his advertising boycott on @elonmusk X https://t.co/Wi3xcj0TuE
Video Transcript AI Summary
IBM's CEO addresses the controversy surrounding the company's decision to pull advertising from a certain platform. He clarifies that IBM has no position on the platform's content but wants to avoid having their ads next to objectionable material. He emphasizes the importance of inclusivity and diversity within the company but denies any illegal practices. The CEO mentions that the 5% diversity target for executive bonuses is not a quota but rather a way to ensure a diverse pool of candidates. He highlights IBM's history of inclusivity and urges employees not to respond to inflammatory statements. The CEO concludes by expressing optimism about the company's performance and addressing various questions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The last office hours of this year. Do this. Look, I wanna start by addressing something that has occupied a certain I'll use the word small media firestorm, maybe large media firestorm, on x. And that is a piece of news by a journalist called, I think, James O'Keefe. And he, published a video of an internal town hall, I think from June of 'twenty one that I did at Red Hat.
And the firestorm is around a set of topics that are asserting, though the language is more, I'll call it deterministic, but it's asserting that what we did is illegal and we are doing discrimination. So let me just get some context. We, IBM, did pull advertising from X about a month ago. We have actually no position. X can do whatever it wants to do, whatever it wants to do around free speech, promoting of political opinions, I think and really fundamentally believe, is up to X and their management and their ownership.
We have no view on it, positive, negative or anything. What we do not want is that our ads on X are next to content that we find objectionable. By the way, we'll do the same for any site, it's not unique to X. And we found our alto coming up next to objectionable material and we weren't satisfied with any answer of how that was going to be managed or controlled. And thereby, we said we're not going to advertise on X anymore.
I think that's the right that we aim as a company. We can pick which media we decide. Clearly, the management team and the ownership there took umbrage on that and have been quite clear about that. Mr. O'Keefe looked at this and probably got somebody internal because it's an internal video there.
So the assertion is that we are being discriminatory in our hiring practices. So let me talk about this. Do I believe that we should be an inclusive culture? Absolutely. I am not changing our mind on that.
Do we believe that we should lean in and make sure that all communities feel welcome? Absolutely. I did reference a 5% plus minus, this by the way is only on executive bonus pool for those who make improvement by 1% on certain underrepresented minorities. Okay. Now, I think that people misconstrue what this means.
It is not a target. So if any of you hear that there is a target, you can come to me. We do not want targets. I'm quite clear about that. Why?
Let's just look at it. It's a 5% change. That means 95% of exact bonuses are driven by business performance. What drives business performance? Having the best people in the role.
So if 95% says, go get the best person, the 5% simply says, to have a diverse slate and try to make sure that you're being inclusive in all that you pick from. So I want to be quite clear about this. We always want the best people because that drives the bulk of our performance, it drives how our employees feel, it drives everything else. That is why 95, 5. Okay.
Now, as laws change, as whatever happens, we will always try to comply with the law, but we lean in. Being inclusive is a deep, deep fundamental principle we have had, I think for over 80 years, as I think about the strides IBM has made, we were amongst the first to put women into executive management. I think that is either 1930s, I think, late '30s. We were amongst the first to hire Blacks into positions of management in IBM in the United States. I think that was in the 1940s.
We have leaned in on what today is referred to as the LGBTQ, these things, but I'll admit in the 1990s when we started, it was a good 15 years before it became mainstream, it was about same sex couples. We want to be inclusive. We want our employees to feel that they can bring their whole self to work and that is the context. Everything else is a minor tool that helps that context and I want to be clear about that principle and I want to be clear about that. We do not believe we did anything illegal.
Now, there is clearly a set of people who are going to make inflammatory statements, which were not things that we said, because they claim we are going to fire people. We said no such thing. We said the pool of the bonus was 5% plus or minus. By the way, the 5% plus or minus is nothing. If we can, by the way, do a little bit more on cash flow, the bonus will be a lot bigger.
By the way, not just bonus, but also GDP. If we can do better on revenue growth than what we have committed to The Street, all of these will be much, much bigger. So they have far bigger impacts and I hope that everybody is quite aware of that and is able to put it in that context. Many of those attacks, by the way, are going to be about me the individual. Look, I have a thick skin, I'll go deal with it.
Our Board is quite aware of what's going on between the Board, our shareholders, me, we'll go deal with it. I would recommend all of you should not respond. Anything there will just cause more of a response. So I would highly recommend, don't feel this thing. However, the principles I just laid out, if you get asked by friends and family, you can feel free to talk about it in that context.
Am I aware that there may be pockets inside IBM, but people take these to be far more stringent form of black and white. I think we should be careful and not make it black and white and not make it stringent. So I also want to be clear about that. All right. Enough on that topic and let's kind of move on because we're having a good year, people.
We're having a good year and it is based a lot on the hard work and let's go address some of those questions, some about you and some about our business. 1st question
@RNCResearch - RNC Research
WATCH: A CBS reporter takes Karine Jean-Pierre to task over Biden's complete unwillingness to address BORDER SECURITY over the three years he has been in office https://t.co/Vo01x1cMkh
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker emphasizes that a comprehensive immigration reform plan was put forth on day 1 of the presidency, which has been a priority for almost 3 years. They mention regular conversations with congressional leaders on various issues, including immigration. The speaker disagrees with the notion that little public time has been spent on immigration, highlighting policy actions taken to address the border situation. They argue that being consistent and addressing a long-standing issue is demonstrated by the first piece of legislation being on immigration. This shows a serious commitment to fixing a broken system.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They put forth and you laid that out in your question, a comprehensive immigration reform plan. He did that on day 1. And it is going on 3 years, on 3 years
Speaker 1: he spent pushing that bill
Speaker 0: On 3 years.
Speaker 1: Here's the thing. Met with them on foreign policy, On a fiscal cliff,
Speaker 0: on a budget, and it's
Speaker 1: never been about immigration.
Speaker 0: And we have regular conversations with congressional leaders and congressional staff about an array of issues, including this. I mean, this is you cannot send a bigger message to Congress and the American people when you say your 1st, when you put out your 1st piece of legislation is on this issue, is on reforming immigration. Right? It's on fixing flat
Speaker 1: when you spend very little public time as president Talking about the issue, meeting with congressional leaders on the issue specifically, or doing anything else other than having you come out here To say, we issued a bill
Speaker 0: on day 1. I disagree. It's not just issue a bill. Like, not too long ago back in the spring, we put forth policies on trying to make sure that because because congress didn't help on trying to put forth policies that try to make the immigration system humane, right, humane actually dealing with the issue that we're seeing at the border. We have taken policy actions after policy actions without without the help from congress.
Without. Right? And so that is that is being consistent here. And when you put forth the 1st piece of legislation to be on this issue that has been broken for decades. I mean, that's what he did as president.
That's taking it very, very seriously.
@ChuckCallesto - Chuck Callesto
DOUBLE STANDARD: “What’s your message to people who defy Congressional subpoenas.” “Should they be prosecuted by the Justice Department?” JOE BIDEN: “Yes” https://t.co/H55LdKBOSd
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses their hope that the January 6th committee will pursue and hold accountable those who defy congressional subpoenas. When asked about supporting 10 minutes for the Supreme Court, the speaker responds with a clear "No."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Talk to you so much today. You're not gonna talk to me anymore. So do you. And what's your message
Speaker 1: to people who defy congressional subpoenas on the January 6th committee?
Speaker 0: I hope that the committee goes after them and, holds them accountable.
Speaker 1: Does it be prosecuted
Speaker 0: I I do. Yes. Sir, do you support 10 minutes for the Supreme Court? No.
reSee.it AI Summary
In a new video, we approached IBM's CEO, Arvind Krishna, with a crucial question. Despite his significant roles in major tech companies and influential platforms like Davos, he declined to engage. We asked if he would step down to create space for underrepresented minorities in tech.
@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe
NEW VIDEO: We knocked on the door of IBM's CEO @ArvindKrishna today to ask him one question: "If you think Asians are over-represented in tech, will you personally step down to make room for an under-represented minority?" Krishna runs one of the world's biggest tech companies, and he sits on the boards of Northrop Grumman and the New York Federal Reserve. He also spoke at Davos this year. But this man, with seemingly endless power and influence in the world, wouldn't talk to me.
Video Transcript AI Summary
We're outside the house of IBM's CEO, Arvind Krishna, in Connecticut. We're trying to locate him to get answers about allegations of discrimination against Asians in the company. Despite reaching out to us, IBM employees face challenges and we seek accountability through journalism. We're at his door, hoping for a reaction during an all hands call inside. However, it seems he's not present today. We question whether Arvind Krishna, who is on the board of Northrop Grumman and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, should resign from IBM given his comments. We'll continue our search for him.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're about to knock on the door of the CEO of IBM, Arvind Krishna. He's also on the board of Northrop Grumman and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. I'm sitting outside the house of the CEO of IBM here in Connecticut, and we're gonna knock on his door. We're gonna knock on his door. And I could pound like the FBI pounded on my door.
But I'm not Gonna do that. I'm just gonna give a little knock knock. Hello, doggy. Hello, doggy. We're here in Connecticut and we're about to knock on the door of the CEO of IBM, Arvind Krishna.
We're trying to find him. We're trying to locate him. And locate him, we will. He's also on the board of Northrop Grumman and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. We've had 50, 60 people inside IBM reach out to us in the last 48 hours after this story has come out.
A lot of people Face discrimination. We're fired from their jobs, so we want answers. We want accountability. And, of course, accountability comes from sunlight, from exposure, from journalism, not Congress. So here we go.
Let's do it. We're here at the door of the CEO of IBM. We're trying to get answers this morning. There's a all hands call inside of IBM. We're trying to see if there's any reaction to our video.
Doesn't look like there's any sign of life. Trying to get some answers after he was caught on the tape saying that they were discriminating against Asians. Let me say it. Asians in the US are not an underrepresented minority in a tech company. Question is, isn't Arvind Krishna Asian?
So should he resign from IBM? That's what I wanna ask. We'll find him eventually, but it doesn't look like He's here today.
@FrankDeScushin - Frank DeScushin
A Florida high school student is slammed headfirst onto concrete. America's schools have always had fights, but students knew not to potentially kill each other during them. I wonder what changed and I wonder how much schools' anti-white narratives play into scenes like this. https://t.co/4D7ZPWzbTU
reSee.it AI Summary
Democrat Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez claims Republicans lack witnesses to support their allegations. However, evidence suggests otherwise. Tony Bobulinski, Hunter's former business partner, confirmed Joe Biden's involvement in a questionable Chinese energy venture. Devon Archer, another partner, revealed Hunter's frequent calls with then-VP Joe Biden during meetings with foreign associates. Additionally, credible IRS whistleblowers provided extensive evidence of a coverup within Biden's DOJ. Bank records, emails, calls, photos, texts, visitor logs, and sworn witness testimony all contradict the Biden family's long-standing denials.
@RNCResearch - RNC Research
Democrat Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: Republicans "do not have a single witness to any of their alleged allegations!" Except... ☝️ Tony Bobulinski — Hunter's former business partner — who admitted Joe Biden was the "Big Guy" involved in a shady Chinese energy venture and due for payment. ☝️ Devon Archer — Hunter's former business partner and best friend — who said Hunter put then-VP Joe Biden on speakerphone at least two dozen times during meetings with foreign associates. ☝️ Multiple "highly credible" IRS whistleblowers, who provided extensive evidence of a coverup within Biden's DOJ. ☝️ Bank records, emails, calls, photos, texts, visitor logs, and sworn witness testimony all refute the Biden family's years of lies.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The committee has not allowed Hunter Biden to testify publicly, nor have they called any first-hand witnesses to support their allegations. They lack any witnesses to back up their claims.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That not only is the committee not allowing Hunter Biden to testify publicly, but they have not called a single witness, A single first hand witness to any of their allegations. They haven't allowed anybody to testify publicly because they do not have a single witness to any of their alleged allegations. They don't.
reSee.it AI Summary
New York City faces a $7 billion deficit due to illegal migrants, leading to upcoming budget cuts. Mayor Eric Adams plans to cancel 5 police classes, reducing the force to 29,000. The FDNY will see a decrease in manning for 20 fire companies. Sanitation will also be affected, with fewer litter baskets on the streets. Additionally, various state jobs will be impacted. These measures aim to address the financial challenges the city is currently facing.
@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth
New York is about to get even shittier… Mayor Eric Adam’s says New York City is in the Hole for $7 Billion Dollars Because of Illegal Migrants - Therefore More Budget Cuts are Coming to New Yorkers What kind of budget cuts? Here are a few… • Canceling the next 5 Police Classes and to reducing the head count to 29,000. • FDNY - Reducing the manning of at least 20 Fire Companies • Many cuts in sanitation, including Reducing the number of litter baskets on the street… (more trash) • A Whole bunch of other State Jobs https://rumble.com/v4125g1-ny-mayor-eric-adams-says-more-budget-cuts-for-the-cuts-because-of-illegals.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
Given the high cost of migrant care and the lack of federal or state funding, the speaker is concerned about budget cuts. Layoffs and tax increases are potential options, but not preferred. The speaker highlights the influx of people from South America due to destabilization and crime issues. Without a national response and more help from Washington, the situation in the city will worsen. The speaker emphasizes the need for relief during the budgetary season and mentions the legal requirement to balance the budget. Currently, there is a $7 billion deficit that needs to be addressed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Given that migrant care is a huge expense
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: That's not going to go away anytime soon, given that you can't count on federal or significant state money or federal money.
Speaker 1: Mhmm.
Speaker 0: Where are you going with these budget cuts? What else is on the table? Are you looking at layoffs? Are you looking at tax increase? Like, where does it end?
Speaker 1: You know, that is the question. You know, we stated last year. We saw this coming, Joc, and the team, you know, we talked about this, and that's what's so frightening about this. I saw it down in South America. When I saw the level of people who were coming here, the continuous destabilization of Venezuela, what we're seeing in, Ecuador with the crime problem, and people are leaving there.
If if we don't have a real national response, and we're Seeing what governor Abbott is doing intentionally, intentionally saying, I'm going to send, 25,000 to New York. We could you know, we're gonna reach a very, very drastic period in this in this city, very, you know, very awful. Well, we're already there. We're already there. When you look at the numbers that we have here over 150,000 as we indicated, these are not mere numbers.
And, I don't see the relief in sight coming from Washington. We're gonna need more help on the state, during this budgetary season. And, you know, do we want to get to the point of of layoff? No. Do we wanna get to the point Of raising taxes on, you know, you know, these small property owners?
No. But remember, by law, That guy down at the end of the table has he must balance the budget every 2 years by law. There's a certain amount of money that comes in. We have
Speaker 0: to pay the bills going out. That's by law. So November, we had to
Speaker 1: do the November plan. January, we have to do another plan, and we have a $7,000,000,000 hole.
NY Mayor Eric Adam’s says More Budget Cuts for the Cuts because of Illegals
Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper
rumble.com
@JudiciaryGOP - House Judiciary GOP 🎄
🚨 #BREAKING: Republicans Release Impeachment Inquiry Explainer Ahead of Vote https://t.co/HYAiquVzA5
Video Transcript AI Summary
President Joe Biden is facing allegations of taking action to hide money received by his family. Evidence includes payments of $15 million to the Biden family, $240,000 directly to Joe Biden, and a threatening message from Hunter Biden to a Chinese executive. The investigation also focuses on four key questions: whether Biden changed policy due to benefits received, if he provided access to foreign interests in exchange for payments, if he obstructed the investigation into Hunter Biden, and if he abused his office. The impeachment inquiry aims to uncover answers to these questions and determine the grounds for potential articles of impeachment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Politician takes action. Family gets money, and politician takes steps to hide it. A tale as old as time, and that's the tale we face today with president Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: Oh, son of a
Speaker 0: Over the last several months, the judiciary oversight and the ways and means committee have uncovered evidence of Biden and the family in a headless game. The evidence includes 15,000,000 in payments to the Biden family, 240,000 in payments directly to Joe Biden and a threatening WhatsApp message sent by Hunter Biden to a Chinese executive. You have this evidence on top of 4 key facts that Have not changed. 1, Hunter Biden was on the board of Burisma. 2, Hunter was not qualified to be on the board of Burisma.
3, the executives at Burisma Biden asked Hunter to help them with the pressure they're under before. Joe Biden goes to Ukraine, gives a speech attacking the prosecutor, which starts the process of getting him fired. These facts haven't changed, and evidence across the investigation continues to grow. Where there's smoke, there's fire. That's why the judiciary committee, along with the other 2 committees, began this impeachment inquiry into president Joe Biden.
Now you might be asking yourself, what's an impeachment inquiry?
Speaker 1: An impeachment inquiry
Speaker 0: is a phase of congressional investigation.
Speaker 1: In an inquiry,
Speaker 0: we examine and the available evidence to request documents, conduct interviews, and determine the grounds for articles of impeachment. In practice, the inquiry bolsters our Bility. To compel testimony and the documents necessary to conduct our investigation, the goal of our impeachment inquiry is to Get answers on 4 key questions. Question number 1, did Joe Biden take action or change policy because of Benefits received by him or his family from foreign interests. Our investigation thus far has uncovered payments that went to members of the Biden family, happened during Joe Biden's presidency, originated from countries where then Vice Joe.
President Biden played an official role, and we're layering through complicated payment schemes. The oversight committee has identified over 20 different companies It's used in some cases that appear to have been created for the sole purpose of serving as past entities. We will continue to investigate whether this money paid to the Biden's family and an impact on Biden's conduct as president or vice president of the United States, as well as the bribery allegation in the FBI FD 10/20 reform, the circumstances around the $200,000 so called
Speaker 1: loan repayment and the
Speaker 0: $40,000 Achek from wandered Chinese money. Question number 2, did Joe Biden abuse his office by providing foreign interests with access to him and his office in exchange for payments to him or his family. In 2014, Joe Biden dined with a Russian Oligarch, who around the time of the dinner wired 3,500,000 to one of Hunter Biden's businesses. It's important to know that this oligarchy is absent Biden sanctions.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Severe economic sanctions on Putin and all those Brooks around him.
Speaker 0: Additionally, a Biden family associate testified that he was personally aware of at least 20 times president Biden
Speaker 1: We spoke on speaker phone
Speaker 0: with Hunter Biden's foreign business facilities. We will investigate Whether these foreign interests were given access to Joe Biden because of payments made to his family or to any question for him. Did Joe Biden Joe. Steve, access to him in exchange for payments to him or his family. Despite Joe's insistence I've
Speaker 1: never spoken to my Joe. The exact
Speaker 0: opposite is unfortunately true. Evidence shows then vice Joe. Biden spoke and done with Hunter Biden's foreign business associates. Hunter even alleged his father was in
Speaker 1: the room when he landed payment from a Chinese business associate. We will examine if and to
Speaker 0: what degree Joe Biden engaged in Miski. The last question and final point of judiciary's part
Speaker 1: in the impeachment inquiry.
Speaker 0: Did Joe Biden impede, obstruct, or hinder the investigation into Hunter Biden. Here's what we know. The Biden DOJ slow walked the investigation into Hunter Biden. The DOJ let the statute of limitations lapse for tax years 2014 and 2015, the years with income from Burisma. Hunter's legal team was tipped off about an impending search on his storage unit.
The DOJ didn't allow investigators to take steps that would lead the Joe. The DOJ then puts together a sweetheart deal so they can sweep the whole thing under the rug. But thanks to 2 Courageous whistleblowers and a judge in Delaware. The deal failed. The deal began to unravel when the judge asked if he gave Hunter Biden broad immunity for Joe.
Other possible crimes, including in his foreign business dealings in Ukraine and China. All signs point to interference from the highest levels of the Biden administration, Trachin, where Biden appointees and Attorney General Garland orchestrating the plea deal and the investigation to protect Joe. The inquiry phase of our investigation enables us to examine Hammond, the necessary information to not only answer these questions, but helps us determine the grounds for articles
@_johnnymaga - johnny maga
Zelensky just went on Fox and begged western leaders to send ALL their money to Ukraine “Don’t build roads. Spend all your money on weapons, drones, Society and pensions… we have only one enemy: Putin.” https://t.co/gtuGMsMS1e
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker responds to critics by urging government officials and mayors to prioritize the war effort and the defense of their people instead of focusing on other matters. They emphasize the need to allocate resources to weapons, drones, society, and pensions. The speaker asserts that they are leaders who stand against Putin and that he is the only enemy. When asked about democracy, the speaker affirms their commitment to defending it. They thank the interviewer for their time and express gratitude for the opportunity to discuss the ongoing war.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What do you say to critics who are saying that?
Speaker 1: I say such person from government or mayors think about the war, think about how to defend our people. Don't travel through the world each day. Travel to the front line as people as soldiers what they need do this not build roads for today. Don't do it. Spend all your money to the weapon, to the drones, to the society, to the pensions and etcetera.
And don't cry because we are leaders and that's it. That's why that's why we are and that's why we stay because mostly people, people are not trying. People stay and fight against Putin, and we don't have any enemies in our country. We can't have and can't have time for this and we don't have it. We have only 1 enemy.
This is Putin and that's it.
Speaker 0: But you'll stand from democracy going forward? Yes.
Speaker 1: Of course. And of course. Because we are really defending democracy, and we are really defending freedom?
Speaker 0: Mister president, we appreciate your time, and we'll continue to follow the war.
Speaker 1: Thank you
reSee.it AI Summary
A student criticized @PLCSchools for including a explicit book in the curriculum, containing graphic details of sexual acts. The superintendent advised the concerned mom to request an alternative book. Why are such books accessible to minors in schools?
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
A student at @PLCSchools blasted the district as he read from a p*rn*gr*phic book which was required in the curriculum for his class. The book includes graphic details of se*ual acts including oral s*x. A mom reached out to the superintendent who responded that he can't remove it from the curriculum and her son should just request a different book from his teacher. Why are these books being made available to minors in schools?!
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm here to read from the book "Eleonore and Park," which has been read in our class for years despite its explicit language and sex scenes. Some argue that it's age-appropriate, but if that's the case, then we shouldn't punish older students for using profanity. Even the teacher was uncomfortable with the book. I don't feel more prepared for life because of it, and there are better options available. Here's an excerpt from page 275, describing a sexual encounter between the characters. Thank you for your time.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm here tonight to read to our community from a book we just finished in class. The book is Eleonore and Park. This book has been read in class for several years despite vulgar language and very obvious sex scenes. Some have argued that it is age appropriate. And if this is how you feel, I hope you don't plan on punishing 17 18 year old kids Anymore for dropping f bombs or repeatedly or use of profane terms like you must be a slut, you smell like cum, which comes out of the book we just read.
While it was being played in class, even the teacher was uncomfortable. I'm not anymore prepared for life because we read this book. There are so many better options. And I'd like to read part of part of the book. So this is on page 275.
She Is it alright. She felt so good underneath even better than he had expected. He'd expected her to feel like heaven plus Nirvana plus the scene in Willy Wonka where Charlie starts to fly. Park was breathing so hard, he couldn't get any air. It seemed impossible that this could feel as good to Eleanor as it did to him, but she was making these faces.
She looked like a girl in a Prince video. If Eleanor was feeling anything like what he was feeling, How were they ever supposed to stop? He pulled her shirt up over her head. Bruce Lee, she whispered. What?
That didn't seem right to Park. Park's hands froze. Super high Asian guy, Bruce Lee. Oh, he laughed. He couldn't help it.
Okay. I'll give you Bruce Lee. She arched her back, and he closed his eyes. He never get enough of Thank you for your time.
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
“Queers for Palestine” shut down the Manhattan Bridge last night while chanting that the IDF is the KKK. This is what decolonization looks like. https://t.co/o0artfeI7S
@RNCResearch - RNC Research
Biden is reading his answer to a reporter's question directly from a script in front of him 🤔 https://t.co/CBuaFaKLvy
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ukraine has made significant progress in reclaiming its territory from Russia. Despite Russia's attempts to erase Ukraine from the map and absorb it into their country, Ukraine has managed to regain over 50% of the land that was seized since February 2022. Additionally, Ukraine has successfully pushed back the Russian Navy, allowing them to export grain and steel through the Black Sea. This has been a major achievement for Ukraine in terms of protecting its sovereignty and ensuring its economic growth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me, answer the question first. Let's put this in perspective. Remember how far Ukraine has come. Russia has failed, failed thus far in trying to erase Ukraine from the map and, subsume it into Russia. Ukraine has taken back more than 50% of its territory seized since February of 22 and has pushed Back Russian the Russian Navy so Ukraine can export grain and steel to the world through the Black Sea.
@atensnut - Juanita Broaddrick
This dude wants more of your hard earned money. What do you tell him? https://t.co/htsVJy6Czw
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
WOAH: Lifelong Democrat operative who fundraised for Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders DEFECTS Party, Registers as REPUBLICAN to vote for TRUMP https://t.co/po7YJNNp9q
Video Transcript AI Summary
A former lifelong Democrat who campaigned for Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders is leaving the party and becoming a Republican due to the Democratic Party's disconnect with the American people. The author, Will Pierce, believes that the party has shifted away from its original ideas and now focuses on labeling and dividing people rather than uniting them. He criticizes the Democrats for prioritizing issues like the situation in Kyiv and the southern border over the needs of the average American. Pierce also expresses disappointment in President Joe Biden's performance, particularly regarding the economy and his failure to unite the nation. While he is leaning towards voting for Trump in 2024, he remains undecided. The interviewer suggests that Pierce's switch to the Republican Party could potentially help Republicans improve their election outcomes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A lifelong Democrat who campaigned for Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders is now leaving the party and becoming a Republican. In an op ed, Will Pierce writes, the main reason I'm leaving the Democratic Party is its utter disconnect with the American people. The party that once championed the working class has now been overtaken by elites and affluent hubs who couldn't care less about the struggles of the average American. That author, Will Pierce, Joins me now. Will, great to have you on the program.
Look. You weren't just a Democratic voter. You were practically a Democratic party operative. So what was the final straw for you?
Speaker 1: I think over the years, it's hard the party has changed from its ideas. I personally view politics as a game of addition. You have to get to 50% plus 1 and unite people all the way around. If you look at the Democratic Party right now, they're out of put people in boxes and label them whether they unite them.
Speaker 0: Do Democrats just not care about the voters that they say they care about?
Speaker 1: I think it's changed over years. Just if you just look at recent races, like, look down in Houston versus Sheila Jackson Lee, for example. This is pretty much a lead of 4 years in the Democratic Party, and her votes were just abysmal around 30%. And it's just people in the Democratic Party, they just do not understand about the needs overall. If you look at today, for example, going up to the capital, the Democrats care more about what's happening in Kyiv and what's going on on the southern border.
They care about more about, just ideological stuff such as Who you are as a, it's more about basically just like, what you are, your gender, your race, your etcetera, than who you are as a person.
Speaker 0: Well, the rot starts at the top. And in a new poll From the Wall Street Journal, 60% of voters disapprove of Joe Biden's economy followed by 64% disapproval of Joe Biden's border. Over half disapprove of Joe Biden's handling of the war in Israel. So, Will, how much is Joe Biden to blame for people like you leaving the Democratic Party?
Speaker 1: I'll be honest. When I supported Biden back in 2015, 2016, I, you know, I was looking at his record over the years, and that's the main reason why I supported, the president. At this point, though, if you look at, just the economy, if you look at where we are as a nation, if you look at where we are as a people, he has not done what he promised to do or Just as he's supposed to do as president. He's supposed to unite us. Instead, he's debriding us, and it's just not at the top as you said, Tyler.
Speaker 0: Do you know anyone else like you? Lifelong Democrats, like Die in the wool, Democrats, who, who are out, who are leaving the party for the Republicans.
Speaker 1: I I don't know anyone by name, but the thing is even, like, for example, my wife and I, we were talking last night. This is a big decision for myself, and a lot of people in the Democratic party, it's I hate to say they're just afraid of leaving. They're we would think even think of our safety, like, what it's gonna be like just me leaving a party that I worked for 4 years, overall. And you have a lot of people just thinking like that. It's like they think overall, Can I leave the party?
Can I, you know, go across to the other side? And, personally, I'm doing this because I look at the nation overall. We're at a very divisive period. If you look at the polling that you just quoted, it's Just our nation overall, we have to be able to focus and be more united instead of being divided and just focus on on just, party politics, I feel.
Speaker 0: That leads to the final question. Who are you gonna vote for? In the same Wall Street Journal poll, Trump beating Biden by 4 points. Nikki Haley up 17% over Biden. Who's got your vote in 2024?
Speaker 1: It's I think this is the first time since I've been, to be honest, over 20 years. I'm actually undecided. I'm leaning towards Trump, but I'm still looking at, what's gonna happen over the next few weeks, up up in New Hampshire, Iowa.
Speaker 0: I can't tell you. I live in a pretty Democratic state up there in Connecticut. I can't tell you how many Diehard Democrats have said, I never thought I would vote for Trump. I certainly didn't vote for him in 2020, but I'm voting for him this year, and that should speak volumes. Hey.
Maybe if you, leave the Democratic Party and call it the republican, you can bring their ability to, you know, win elections. Republicans seem to have a problem with that. Maybe you can give your your strategy and operative and help
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
A teacher in @Opt4Learning dru*ged kids with a calming sleepy patch without telling parents. Parents report their kids had withdrawal symptoms, and developed eating and sleeping problems. The school says they are "investigating." Teachers can be reported to the state licensing board here: https://www.ctc.ca.gov/educator-discipline/reporting-educator-misconduct
Video Transcript AI Summary
Parents at Options For Learning head start in South El Monte are accusing a teacher of placing Zen Patches mood calming stickers on their children without permission. The parents discovered the stickers, which contain essential oils, on their children's backs. They believe the stickers caused behavioral issues and withdrawal effects. A physician warns against applying substances to children without understanding their health history and parental consent. The school has stated that the employee is no longer with them and an investigation is ongoing. Some parents believe other teachers were involved and have withdrawn their children from the school.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Kids were being drugged with sleepy time patches without their consent, and they say they were disguised as stickers.
Speaker 1: Did the teacher give you any stickers, any patches? Yeah. And where would she put them?
Speaker 2: Here.
Speaker 0: In inside? Yes.
Speaker 1: Show me where the teacher put the sticker on you. Why'd my shirt?
Speaker 0: They're not just plain old stickers. Parents are accusing a teacher at Options For Learning head start in South El Monte of placing Zen Patches mood calming stickers on their children without permission. So while we were surprised, and really upset.
Speaker 2: Because, you know, you you bring your kids You expect it to be good. You know? They were being put on every single child on this classroom.
Speaker 0: The parents alleged the teacher would take the patches off the students right before it was time to home, but got caught the day this parent showed up unannounced.
Speaker 3: We came early for my little one when we caught it.
Speaker 0: She says her little The boy had a mood calming sticker on his back. When she started asking questions, she discovered other students were also given Similar patches.
Speaker 3: And we've seen a lot of behavioral issues, sleeping patterns, eating patterns different. So we've seen that That the children are having, like, withdrawal,
Speaker 0: effects. I don't even know what the teacher was thinking
Speaker 2: when she did that. Maybe it was easier for them To control all the kids, to have them fall asleep faster. I
Speaker 4: mean, as a physician, I would emphasize the fact that applying any substance Like an essential oil to children without thorough understanding of their health history and parental consent is not advisable.
Speaker 0: Doctor Daniel Turner Uveras is shot an educator would put medicated stickers on children without parental consent even if the patches only have calming essential oils.
Speaker 4: Essential oils can cause allergic reactions, for anyone with skin sensitivities and their effects are not uniformly regulated or standardized by anyone. So there is a risk with that in itself.
Speaker 0: The school issued a statement that says in part, the employee is no longer with options for learning. Our investigation is ongoing, and an incident and report has been submitted to licensing, which will conduct its own investigation. We are reinforcing child safety with all our teachers and classroom staff.
Speaker 2: Firing her is not good enough at all. I want justice, you
Speaker 0: know, she should
Speaker 2: be in jail.
Speaker 0: Parents believe that other teachers were also involved in this incident, and they have pulled their kids out of school. Meanwhile, the school itself is saying that it was only 1 teacher, and that person is no longer there. Reporting from El Monte, I'm Gina Silva. I'll send it back to you guys in the studio.
.png?sfvrsn=c28b72b1_10)
Report Educator Misconduct
userbubbles4searcharrow-rightBookClipboardExcMarkMultiArrowsPencilScaleThumbprintCertificateDashedArrowICircleMultiDataQuestionSchoolWrenchCheckCircleDataMagnifyingGlassPaperRefreshSpeechBubblefacebooktwitterofficestats-dotsstats-bars2laptopcontact-mailinfo
ctc.ca.gov
@EndWokeness - End Wokeness
Biden just invited Zelensky to the Oval Office to give another $200,000,000 Meanwhile on OUR border: https://t.co/JbHprzqCCz
@RNCResearch - RNC Research
Biden tells the press to "hush up," announces he "just signed another $200 million drawdown from the Department of Defense for Ukraine," then sits and stares as his handlers remove the press from the room https://t.co/pKto8y4KMt
Video Transcript AI Summary
I just signed a $200 million drawdown from the Department of Defense for Ukraine. It will be coming quickly. Thank you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you. And before the press Before the press Before the press Woah. Woah. Hush up a second. Okay?
Got one more thing to say. I just signed another $200,000,000 drawdown from the Department of Defense for Ukraine, And that'll be coming quickly. Thank you. Thank you. Well, that
@RNCResearch - RNC Research
Biden says securing our border is an "extreme Republican partisan agenda" https://t.co/PkaxfLzxAO
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the act of withholding Ukraine funding to push a partisan agenda on the border, stating that it is not the right approach. They emphasize the need for genuine solutions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Holding Ukraine funding hostage in an attempt to force through an extreme republican partisan agenda on the border is not how it works. We need real solutions.
@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives
🔥🚨BREAKING: Pitbull the International Pop-star told Democrats that are threatening to leave the United States to go to the country that he is from to gain respect for America. https://t.co/kYvB1CR7T8
Video Transcript AI Summary
Like the United States or America, may god bless you, but fuck you at the same time. If you don't like the United States, go back to your own countries and see how you appreciate it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Like the United States or America, may god bless you, but fuck you at the same time. If you don't like the United States of America, go back to the countries that we the fuck from, and you'll see how you appreciate the United States
@RealPizzaPepe - Pizza Pepe
“Transgender” pred gets caught trying to meet up with a child. These people are sick. https://t.co/xSNYSWLoLw
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 confronts Speaker 1, who identifies as a lesbian and is looking for her friend Rachel. Speaker 0 dismisses Speaker 1's identity and demands to know who she is meeting. Speaker 1 insists it is Rachel, but Speaker 0 claims to be the person she was talking to all along. Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 to put her phone down for their safety.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And one chance only, to be honest with me. Okay? Listen.
Speaker 1: Look. I I'm a lesbian. I'm trying to meet my friend, Rachel.
Speaker 0: You're a what?
Speaker 1: I'm a lesbian. I'm trying to meet my friend, Rachel.
Speaker 0: That doesn't matter. Listen. What? Stop the bullshit. Okay?
Who are you coming here to meet? Do you want me to call the cops and speed the process up? No. Can you just talk to me? I'm talking to you.
I'm asking you a question. Then who are you coming here to meet? Who? Please. Be honest.
Who are you?
Speaker 1: Who? My friend Rachel.
Speaker 0: No. I was the I was the boy you were talking to. Can you talk to me? I'm talking to you. I was the boy you were talking to, the whole time.
Can you put the phone down, please? You I did. I this is for my protection and yours. I told
@ChuckCallesto - Chuck Callesto
JUST IN: Polish lawmaker Grzegorz Braun extinguishes Hanukkah candle in parliament.. https://t.co/WCVvsnzTEG
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
Netflix film called "Leave The World Behind" produced by the Obamas includes a scene demonizing white people. White people are the only group you’re allowed and celebrated to be racist towards and it will be put into movies by the most influential people. https://t.co/WxyIYmzGOH
Video Transcript AI Summary
In times of crisis, it is important to be cautious about who we trust, particularly when it comes to white individuals. Trust should not be given freely, even if our loved ones may agree with this perspective.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm asking for you to remember that if the world falls apart, trust should not be dulled out easily to anyone, especially white people. Even mom would agree with me on that.
@CitizenFreePres - Citizen Free Press
Rand Paul gets it: "Borrowing money from China to send it to Ukraine makes no sense. It makes us weaker, not stronger." https://t.co/VX0WKMVdfd
Video Transcript AI Summary
Borrowing more money to send to Ukraine is irresponsible and weakens us. Congress doesn't care about the debt because it's not their money. Milton Friedman's statement holds true: nobody spends someone else's money as wisely as their own. The big spenders in Congress won't use their own money. Americans should take notice and blame these wasteful spenders.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But it's irresponsible to simply borrow more money. To borrow the money from China simply to send it to Ukraine makes no sense and makes us weaker, not stronger. But let's be honest, most of Congress doesn't seem to care about the debt, doesn't seem to care how much money we shovel out the door and out of the country. Why? Because it's not their money.
Every day, Milton Friedman statement is proven correct that nobody spends somebody else's money as wisely as their own. I doubt the big spenders in Congress will ever consider spending any of their own money, but Americans across the land should sit up and notice and attach blame to these profligate spenders.
reSee.it AI Summary
IBM CEO Arvind Krishna is facing backlash after a leaked video revealed his admission to using coercion to fire employees and withhold bonuses unless they engage in discriminatory hiring practices. The company recently suspended advertising on Elon Musk's platform due to its zero tolerance for hate speech and discrimination. A webinar titled "Mastering the Art of the Whistleblower" aims to educate individuals on exposing the truth. While some question the validity of the allegations, the evidence speaks for itself.
@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe
BREAKING LEAKED VIDEO: CEO of IBM @ArvindKrishna admits to using coercion to fire people and take away their bonuses unless they discriminate in the hiring process. “You got to move both forward by a percentage that leads to a plus on your bonus," Krishna said about hiring Hispanics, "and by the way if you lose, you lose part of your bonus.” After pulling ads from X for 'racism,' IBM chief Arvind Krishna says he will fire, demote or strip bonuses from execs who don't hire enough blacks, Hispanics — or hire too many Asians "Asians are not an underrepresented minority in tech in America...I’m not going to finess this, for blacks we should try to get towards 13 percent," says Krishna. Paul Cormier, the chairman of Red Hat, a subsidiary of IBM, says in the leaked recording that Red Hat has terminated people because they weren't willing to engage in racial discrimination through hiring and promotion. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act makes it illegal for employers to discriminate on the basis of race in the workplace. #IBMLeaks
Video Transcript AI Summary
IBM CEO Arvind Krishna is seen in an internal video pressuring employees to discriminate in the hiring process or face termination and loss of bonuses. The video, leaked by an insider, shows Krishna emphasizing the need to increase representation of underrepresented minorities and gender diversity. He specifically mentions the need to reach 13% representation for blacks and mid-teens for Hispanics. However, he states that Asians are not considered an underrepresented minority in the tech industry. The video also features Red Hat CEO Paul Cormier discussing the accountability and efforts to improve diversity and inclusion within the company. The leaked video has sparked controversy and raised concerns about potential violations of Title 7.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We take underrepresented and gender. You got to move both forward by a percentage that leads to a plus on your bonus. By the way, if
Speaker 1: you lose, you lose part of
Speaker 0: your bonus. I'm not trying to finesse this. So for blacks, we should try to get towards 13. Something percent. On Hispanics, you gotta get into the mid teens.
Let me say it. Asians in the US are not an underrepresented minority in a tech company.
Speaker 2: James O'Keefe here outside The IBM's corporate headquarters in Armonk, New York, an IBM insider has provided us with an internal video showing the CEO of IBM, Arvind Krishna using coercion to fire people and take away their bonuses unless they discriminate in the hiring process.
Speaker 3: Let me go deeper into Red Hat. Multiple leaders over the last year plus that were held accountable to the point that they're no longer here at Red Hat because they weren't willing to live up to the standards that we set in this space. This conversation takes place every single day, and in a lot of it's behind the scenes.
Speaker 2: They terminated executives that didn't discriminate yet another violation of title 7. One of the biggest companies in the world, one of the most valuable and recognizable brands on Earth. IBM Insider Has provided us with an internal video showing the CEO of IBM, Arvind Krishna, using coercion to fire people And take away their bonuses unless they discriminate in the hiring process, which appears to be a violation Of title 7, this comes on the heels of IBM pulling advertising from Elon Musk's ex with IBM saying they have zero tolerance For discrimination, quote, IBM has zero tolerance for discrimination, and we've immediately suspended all advertising on x while we investigate.
Speaker 3: So so let me let me add a couple of things with a Red Hat flavor on it. I think Arvind laid that out pretty well, but let me go deeper into Red Hat. As Arvind Very much pointed out and I very much understand, I am accountable, I hold myself accountable, he holds me accountable, as does the board for all of IBM. But I hope we also hold the leadership at Red Hat accountable for that. I mean, I'll be very candid.
Without an exception for for privacy, I could name multiple leaders over the last year plus that were held accountable to the point that they're no longer here at Red Hat because they weren't willing to live up to the standards that we set in this space. And so as I said, I I'm accountable to Arvind on this as well as to IBM. For example, one of the changes I made, I named the DNI lead, person in Margaret reporting directly to me in the CLT. We have Margaret sits on the CLT as the DNI functions and this is this is worked on every single one of our meetings, it takes this conversation takes place every single day And a lot of it's behind the scenes, but let me show you this is happening. We're never gonna cross the DEI off our list of priorities.
This is an ongoing thing.
Speaker 2: That was Paul Kurnier, CEO of Red Hat, which is a software company owned by IBM, saying that they terminated executives that didn't discriminate yet another violation of
Speaker 0: so we take underrepresented and gender, you got to move both forward by a percentage that leads to a plus on your bonus. By the
Speaker 1: way, if you lose, you lose part of
Speaker 0: your bonus. Paul's head to the same standards. Paul and I have been working together to say, okay, how do we apply those deeper into the organization?
Speaker 2: That was the head of IBM saying he's gonna reduce the bonus if you don't hit your racial quotas. Arvind Krishna is using Racial considerations in making the work environments diverse and doing so coercively by placing burdens on employees to do so, the removal of bonus or termination, that's also a violation of Title 7.
Speaker 0: I'm very clear about this. I expect at the executive level so that is not just my directs, but all executives in the company have to move forward by 1% on both under represented minorities. Let me say it, Asians in the US are not an underrepresented minority in a tech company. However, others are. Ditto on gender diversity.
Speaker 2: Now at least 13 State attorney generals have put companies on notice that they should not be using racial discrimination in the hiring process. These Attorney generals include Kansas, Tennessee, Alabama, Arkansas, Indiana, Nebraska, Iowa, South Carolina, Kentucky, West Virginia, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Paul Cronier did not disclose the names of his employees that were terminated, but we at OMG welcome you if you have been fired To reach out to us on our tip line, contact us on our website or on signal. We'd like to speak to you. Title 7 of the Civil Rights Act of 1960 Before states, it shall be unlawful employment practice for an employer to fail or refuse to hire or discharge any individual or otherwise to any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or National origin. In terms of national origin of the Civil Rights Act, the CEO of IBM, Arvind Krishna, also specifically targeting Asians in this private leak recording
Speaker 0: Let me say it. Asians in the US are not an underrepresented minority in a tech company.
Speaker 2: This recording comes in the Context of DEI, diversity, equity, inclusion, Alison Showalter is on this private leaked Video inside IBM talking about DEI.
Speaker 4: Our last question, is about diversity, equity, and inclusion. IBM highlights their progress in promoting and recruiting underrepresented minorities in represented minorities in executive roles and holding executives accountable for DNI goals. At Red Hat, executive representation is dismal, and there is no accountability for DEI work.
Speaker 2: Elon Musk has just come out against DEI and quotas last week. We've reached out to Elon Musk for comment, Alison for comment, Krishna for comment, and Paul for comment. Hey there. This is James O'Keefe, with, OMG News looking to talk to the CEO of IBM.
Speaker 1: Do you have an appointment?
Speaker 2: I do not.
Speaker 1: Does anybody know that you're coming?
Speaker 2: Possibly. Possibly. Depends upon how much I'm surveilled, which The likelihood of that is quite high. But is there a possibility we could speak with Krishna today?
Speaker 1: You would have to make an appointment before that.
Speaker 2: Elon Musk joining the cause to abolish DEI consistently critical of programs like this. IBM canceling their advertising on a list of companies that includes Disney. Now some more context here. This video is from 2021, but we just obtained it last week from an insider, A whistleblower inside IBM. IBM, one of the biggest companies in the world here in Westchester, New York at their corporate headquarters Just outside New York City, one of the most valuable and recognizable brands on earth.
IBM is one of the 30 companies indexed in the Dow Jones, One of the main indicators of the health of US and global stock markets. This is James O'Keefe in Westchester County, New York reporting for OMG News.
Speaker 4: Our last question, is about diversity, equity, and inclusion. IBM highlights their progress in promoting and recruiting underrepresented minorities in executive roles and holding executives accountable for DNI gold. At Red Hat, executive representation is dismal and there is no accountability for DEI work. Why do you not hold Paul to the same standards for diverse staffing and leadership as IBM does.
Speaker 0: Oh, I hold Paul actually to the exact same standards. Let me begin with that. The rest of you may not realize this, but Paul is part of my direct executive pool, right, not just part of Red Hat. Consequently, I'm very clear about this. I respect at the executive level, so that is not just my directs, but all executives in the company have to move forward by 1% on both underrepresented minorities, let me say it, Asians in the US are not an underrepresented minority in a tech company.
However, others are, ditto on gender diversity. So we take underrepresented and gender. You got to move both forward by a percentage that leads to a plus on your bonus.
Speaker 1: By the way, if you lose, you lose part of
Speaker 0: your bonus. Paul's head to the same standards. Paul and I have been working together to say, okay, how do we apply those deeper into the organization? By the way, just to make people give you one statistic, this is not executives. When I looked at our entire recruiting for the 1st now 6 months 14 days of the year, IBM recruits in the tens of thousands, 41%, 40 point something, so I'll round up to 41% our gender diverse, meaning women, which I think is our high watermark, but in all of them, we want to get to the representational demographics of the underlying populations, I'm not trying to finesse this.
So for blacks, we should try to get towards 13. Something percent, on Hispanics, you got to get into the mid teens. On gender, okay, we are somewhere in the mid 30s, I think, for all of IBM. But I think if I notice right, the representational is 50. Maybe Harrison can correct me.
I think it's actually by biology, you can go and debate this. I think it's actually slightly over 50. I think it's 50.1 or something. And so we should try to aspire and that's why I say, let's improve 1 point a year. I don't like to set a target for a small group, but for the executive population, I want to say, hey, you got to improve by a percent a year.
If we improve by that, then in a few years, we'll actually get to where we want to get to. And that, by the way, includes Paul. So you said the question as a Paul is not included. Paul is very much included in that.
Speaker 3: So let me add a couple of things with a Red Hat flavor on it, I think Arvind laid that out pretty well, but let me go deeper into Red Hat. The assertion there is no accountability around DNI efforts at Red Hat is really not the full picture. As Arvind very much pointed out and I very much understand, I am accountable, I hold myself accountable, he holds me accountable, As does the board for all of IBM. But I hope we also hold the leadership at Red Hat accountable for that. I mean, I'll be very candid.
Without an exception for privacy, I could name multiple leaders over the last year plus that were held accountable to the point that they're no longer here at Red Hat, because they weren't willing to live up to the standards that we set in this space. And so as I said, I'm accountable to Arvind on this as well as to IBM. We've been transparent with a lot of the work that we've done in being in the space and progress is being made. For example, one of the changes I made, I named the DNI lead, person in Margaret reporting directly to me in the CLT. We have Margaret sits on the CLT as the DNI functions and this is worked on every single one of our meetings, it takes this conversation takes place every single day And a lot of it's behind the scenes, but let me show you this is happening.
All of our leaders here are committed to change and improving Red Hat's environment to be more inclusive and diverse. We're working on determining those metrics for success and how we want to measure our because
Speaker 2: we've
Speaker 3: because we put more focus on it with Margaret as well as as others. We're going to hold. We are and continue to hold and going to hold even more our executives accountable for all of this and they will have metrics around this. And so I think it's important that we understand this. What you might not see behind the scenes does not make, you know, does not ensure that it's not happening with, and those goals will be out soon.
In addition to the goals we're working on, the DEI team with the people's analytics team is establishing forge dashboards that we'll all be able to share with the entire company, which we can review at an open forum. We will review at an open, form of mine. Our goal is to do what's best for Red Hat and Red Hatters, but it takes time to implement and we need to continue to have the hard conversations and do the hard work that it takes to move forward. We're never going to cross the DEI off our list of priorities. This is an ongoing thing.
But if you have feedback or ideas on how we can better it, please let Margaret and her team know. This is work that we all have to do together and I assure you that we are working this at all levels of Red Hat.
@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe
All of this comes on the heels of IBM canceling advertising on @elonmusk X platform just weeks ago: "IBM has zero tolerance for hate speech and discrimination and we have immediately suspended all advertising on X"
@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe
Learn how to expose the truth just like this IBM whistleblower at my next webinar, "Mastering the Art of the Whistleblower" this Wednesday, Dec 13 @ 7 PM ET. Sign up at http://okeefewebinar.com
Exclusive LIVE Webinar | O'Keefe Media Group
Master the Art of Investigative Journalism with James O'Keefe
okeefewebinar.com
@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe
Here is what @grok is saying about the new #IBMLeaks story. Not sure why Grok is saying the "allegations should be taken with a grain of salt." It's the guy's own words, @elonmusk https://t.co/CiBNojJ1GE
@CitizenFreePres - Citizen Free Press
"Long live the intifada!" Columbia University is a breeding ground for terrorism. https://t.co/W5czA0qxKp
@DrEtiquette - DR. ETIQUETTE 🤦♂️
This is before Ruby Freeman received representation from the deep state. https://t.co/K41K8LdEqQ
@TheMilkBarTV - MilkBarTV
Compilation of people that believed in Covid vaccines until the evidence of their harm & ineffectiveness became clear. @Johnincarlisle @DrAseemMalhotra @ABridgen https://t.co/htScjzNZTh
Video Transcript AI Summary
Biden's successful vaccination campaign is attributed to expanding the list of vaccine providers. However, one person believes that getting the vaccine actually lowered their immune system and caused them to contract COVID-19. In Florida, a statewide grand jury is being called to investigate any wrongdoing related to COVID-19 vaccines. The speaker expects the Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine to be authorized in the UK soon, which they believe will have a significant impact on the pandemic. Vaccine reactions are discussed, with one person having a negative experience and another claiming their son was harmed by the vaccine. Vaccine hesitancy is attributed to false information on social media, despite vaccines being proven safer than other drugs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Biden's kinda kicking ass. 97,000,000 vaccines have got 2,000,000 a day now. To but one reason why they're doing so well with that is they expanded the list of who can give, shots. I went to my vet.
Speaker 1: Oh,
Speaker 0: it's fine. It's a little different. He gave me this shot, and then he put a cone on my neck. I I I don't I didn't get COVID the whole 14 months. Then as soon as I got the vaccine, like, a month later, I got COVID.
I think they're connected. And when you get the vaccine, it it by its design, it lowered my immune system.
Speaker 2: To to impanel a statewide grand jury to investigate any and all wrongdoing in Florida with respect to to COVID nineteen vaccines.
Speaker 3: And the main bottom line of this video is I'm expecting the Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine to be authorized by the UK authorities just after Christmas. And I don't think it's too much of an exaggeration to say that this is going to change, the world or certainly Change the world of the pandemic. And then and and through that, the world is going to be massively significant as well as we'll claims of efficacy were vastly, vastly overstated and as we'll see, to this is in fact the case. You could argue it was very vastly overstated.
Speaker 4: But I don't wanna jinx the vaccine, so I'm not gonna talk about that yet. You said because I'm just fearful something's gonna happen. I wanna get it so badly. Set up though to I have an appointment to get the vaccine tomorrow. It is the Pfizer vaccine, but I I can't care less whether it's Moderna or Pfizer.
Just give it to me. Yeah. Just give it to me. And I had a horrible reaction to the vaccine. I have a son that had a is completely violated by the COVID vaccine.
We are making a healthy person sick.
Speaker 5: Fortunately, for this country, The procurement and rollout of the vaccine has been such an excellent job compared to our competitor economy.
Speaker 1: It's the vaccines they're causing excess deaths in New Zealand just like it's the vaccines causing excess deaths in the UK and elsewhere. So can we please have a statement now from the government suspending these experimental mRNA vaccines before any more death to And harm is done to our population. Thank you.
Speaker 5: We need to understand where this vaccine hesitancy is coming from. There is some, irrational clearly irrational reasoning behind why people don't want to take the vaccine, which is based upon very blatant False information that's circulating on social media. When you look at all of the drugs out there that people are taking, vaccines by far are the safest. In the trials that led to the approval by the regulators. You are more likely to suffer a serious adverse event from taking the vaccine, hospitalization, disability, life changing event, Then you were to be hospitalized with COVID.
So what that means is it's highly likely
reSee.it AI Summary
IBM CEO Arvind Krishna is caught in a leaked video admitting to using coercion to fire employees and withhold bonuses unless they discriminate in hiring. He specifically mentions the need to hire Hispanics and increase the representation of blacks to 13%. Red Hat, an IBM subsidiary, is also implicated in terminating individuals who refuse to engage in racial discrimination. This behavior goes against Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits workplace racial discrimination.
@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe
BREAKING LEAKED VIDEO: CEO of IBM @ArvindKrishna admits to using coercion to fire people and take away their bonuses unless they discriminate in the hiring process. “You got to move both forward by a percentage that leads to a plus on your bonus," Krishna said about hiring Hispanics, "and by the way if you lose, you lose part of your bonus.” After pulling ads from X for 'racism,' IBM chief Arvind Krishna says he will fire, demote or strip bonuses from execs who don't hire enough blacks, Hispanics — or hire too many Asians "Asians are not an underrepresented minority in tech in America...I’m not going to finess this, for blacks we should try to get towards 13 percent," says Krishna. Paul Cormier, the chairman of Red Hat, a subsidiary of IBM, says in the leaked recording that Red Hat has terminated people because they weren't willing to engage in racial discrimination through hiring and promotion. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act makes it illegal for employers to discriminate on the basis of race in the workplace. #IBMLeaks
@CitizenFreePres - Citizen Free Press
America: make it gay and put a chick in it. China: literally hijacking your country. https://t.co/o5cfMCXDsE
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hackers linked to China's People's Liberation Army have reportedly infiltrated critical US services, including the Texas power grid, a Hawaiian water utility, a West Coast port, and an oil and gas pipeline. The goal seems to be to disrupt or destroy these systems in the event of a conflict with the US, potentially preventing the US from projecting power in Asia or causing chaos within the country. Over the past year, hackers affiliated with the Chinese military have accessed the computer systems of around 24 critical services.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The post reveals hackers affiliated with China's People's Liberation Army have infiltrated critical services here in the US. Alexandra Hoff joins us now from our nation's capital. Alex, this is not good. No. It's not.
I mean, this infiltration appears to be part of a broader effort to insert chaos Into our logistical systems, the information collected could then be weaponized if the US and China were to become engaged directly in the Pacific. According to reporting from The Washington Post setting multiple US and industry security officials, China's cyber army is invading critical US services, like An attempt to break into the system behind Texas's independent power grid. Other victims include a water utility in Hawaii, a West Coast port, and at least 1 oil and gas pipeline according to that report you're seeing there. Brandon Wells, executive director of the Department of Homeland Security Cybersecurity Agency, told The Washington Post this, Quote, it is very clear that Chinese attempts to compromise critical infrastructure are in part to preposition themselves to be able to disrupt or destroy That critical infrastructure in the event of a conflict to either prevent the United States from being able to project power into Asia or to cause societal chaos Inside the United States to affect our decision making around a crisis. The report notes that over the past year, hackers affiliated with the People's Liberation Army in China have accessed the computer systems of about 2 dozen critical
