TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

Saved - May 24, 2023 at 2:27 AM

@snorman1776 - Stinson Norwood

Aug 2020: DeSantis says we will never do lockdowns again. “I cringe” when hearing people talk about shutting down the country. Oct 2020: Trump uses the last debate to brag how we shut down the country to fight this horrible disease after seeing some scary modeling.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Lockdowns will not be implemented again, as they have proven to be ineffective. Peru has had the most severe lockdown since March, enforced by the military, yet it has the highest per capita mortality rate from COVID-19. The global pandemic, originating from China, has led to the closure of economies worldwide. Currently, there are spikes in COVID-19 cases in Europe and various other regions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But we will never do any of these lockdowns, again. And I hear people say they'll shut down the country, and honestly, I cringe because, we know places that have done that. The most draconian lockdown in the world has been Peru, military enforced since March. They have the highest per capita mortality in the world from COVID 2 minutes uninterrupted. Speaker 1: So as you know, 2,200,000 people modeled out, we're expected today. We closed up the greatest economy in the world in order to fight this horrible disease that came from China. It's a worldwide pandemic. It's all over the world. You see the spikes in Europe and many other places right now.
Saved - August 23, 2023 at 10:08 PM

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

The government has already renewed COVID-19 contracts through the year 2028. This has never been about public health.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the connection between mandates, lockdowns, and the upcoming election. They mention whistleblower reports from Alex Jones and how the mainstream media is aligning with those reports. The speaker also talks about government expenditures on COVID test kits and equipment, with some contracts extending to 2028. They connect the narrative of mandates and lockdowns to discussions about mail-in ballots and the integrity of elections. The speaker suggests that these measures are part of a larger agenda, including globalist goals set to conclude in 2030. They mention the potential impact on Trump's presidency and urge caution regarding the reinstatement of protocols. The conversation ends with gratitude and a mention of the upcoming return to Washington DC.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Because they're they're they're they're they've paid for it. Natalie Winters. Speaker 1: No. It's not a conspiracy theory, and I think it's important to really understand this impending round of mandates and lockdowns is just another form of lawfare that is meant to influence the outcome of the election just like the indictment, just like mail in ballots, just like electioneering by, you know, the Marc Elias align groups. And why I say that is because you can see the narrative already unfolding that they're going to need to roll out mail in ballots come time to the 2024 election. But just to kinda go back to the beginning on this tale, it, of course, start with the whistleblower reports from Alex Jones over at Infowars. But in the last few days, we've even seen the mainstream media news cycle sort of coalesced and really align, with those reports, you've seen studios, colleges, other institutions starting to re in state mask mandates. You've seen the whole booster narrative, start to get whipped up again. And what I had uncovered, which I came on the show to talk about not too long ago, had to do with government expenditures really signaling, that the federal government that Joe Biden, particularly the Department of Defense and the VA, have started multimillion dollar contracts to purchase COVID test kits, COVID equipment. These are the exact line items in the contracts. But what the most, in my opinion, curious part is about these contracts, why I think it is so damning is because if you look at the start and stop dates on a lot of these contracts, not only are they projected to start in the future, so in September October. But some of these contracts, which have to do with enforcing what they refer to as COVID nineteen, quote, safety protocols extend all the way to the year 2028. That is the year 2028, 5 years from now. So I really think it goes back to what I was saying in the beginning. This isn't about a public health emergency. This is about and really, Steve, I think it's important to connect it to another sort of narrative that's began bubbling up in the mainstream press. And that is we've seen some very curious op eds coming out from the Atlantic, from the New York Times, that in some cases are calling elections superfluous. They're saying we should abandon democracy in favor of just random selection and random lotteries. That was a featured op ed in The New York Times yesterday. So I think it's curious that you see the timing of sort of this talk about not only mail in ballots, but just elections questioning them and their integrity as a whole, while concurrently you see what is the beginning stages of the narrative that is laying the groundwork, for a new round of mandates and lockdowns, masks, COVID vaccines, boosters, and otherwise. Speaker 0: This is one of the reasons it's so extraordinary. That that was a I was gonna get to that. That was absolutely brilliant because you're seeing these, like, 1st at first, Natalie, when I first read it, I I actually thought it was a parody. I thought it was like the Babylon Bee had written for the New York Times. Then I realized, and it's The Atlantic, You're starting to see them. And and remember, The Atlantic, The New Yorker, New York Magazine, the opinion section of New York Times, that's the railhead Of the left. Once they get it out there, then all of a sudden it'll pop up on MSNBC as they as they make it more accessible. But this is serious. All of a sudden that you see them, And I know that's totally unrelated to the polling that shows Trump beating Biden. Right? Totally unrelated to that. Has nothing to do with that. But I wanna make sure before I let you go. You you you have you have cited a term. And now this is for nomenclature, because remember, part of the things we do posses get the nomenclature and the critical path and statics and dynamics of process. There's a new term I see they're using now because they know that we have So, toxified mandates and lockdowns. It's protocols. When when we read protocols, Natalie Winters, what are we what are we what are we to to assume when they said when you hear this new phrase protocols? What is that to mean? What does that mean? Speaker 1: It's all about branding and marketing because they know most American people oppose lockdowns and mandates. And honestly, Steve, even link it to, I think, what was the a leading item in the news cycle last week, which had to do with Joe Biden potentially declaring a climate change emergency, which people were concerned about the inevitable climate lockdowns that there was such opposition to that. Frankly, I think they sort of had to to scramble and reformulate. And I think, you know, Pfizer and Moderna's profits aside, that's why you're seeing this whole kind of COVID fear mongering come up again. But I think it's also important to link it, of course, to Donald Trump. And remember, the United Nations, The World Economic Forum, a lot of these global agendas, these goals that they have, they're set to conclude in the year 2030. Right? Everyone's heard of agenda 2030. And remember when Donald j Trump is sworn in in the year 2025 after he wins the election, his term will come up. It'll end write in 2029, right, or I guess 2030. So that's why I really think they're throwing the entire kitchen sink, the indictments, you name it, this full blown lawfare, which, like I said, it's important to contextualize these mandates as another form of lawfare because they know if he is in the oval office, agenda 2030 will not be implemented. Whereas if Joe Biden or whoever the Democratic nominee is, they will get carte blanche to roll out their globalist agenda here in the United States. Speaker 0: If you remember in the cold open, when it went to Xi's speech, what was Xi talking about? That all he talked about, that our development program, our sustain our program we come out of here has to coincide with, wait for it, 2030. It was the one number. And you know the Chinese are very specific when they talk to numbers. 2030. That's what the the Trump term would end At high noon, I think on the in on January 20, 20 9. So that's the lead up to that's the lead up. But This is all coming together, and it's a reality. And we're gonna have to deal with it because that's why I said, an individual fate and the fate of the country because now it's all aligned against him. All aligned against him. And this is why you see Murdoch, You know, tonight with the Keebler Elves, there's a whole another part of it, to try to get another element to make make sure that you're convinced That and they're gonna hit Trump on the electability on the electability. Although the poll numbers came out today, just extraordinary. His, his lead expands. Natalie, how do people, how do people get to you on social media? How do people get to your in other places at Tim Pool Show? Speaker 1: They just say they had record a number of viewers last night, but you can find me at Natalie g winters on all platforms. Paul. Promise me. Speaker 0: No. Yeah. No. Stop. You're not gonna drop that when you're leaving. Did Did Poole actually say that, or you did give me that tongue in cheek? Did he had record numbers? Speaker 1: For for live viewers, they said they they hit an unusually the high amount. It was all The War Room Prophecy. But, Steve, you have to promise me that even as they reinstitute these protocols, that you will never bring Anthony his voice back to the War Room intro. Speaker 0: No. No. No. That was a Raheem deal. I I'm a do another than the But I'm a let me tell you something, young lady. Moving from Palm Beach back to DC, DC is gonna be the first, because they've already I think it's rut I think Rutgers Rutgers put in the mask mandates, Morris Brown down Atlanta, Lionsgate Studio. The very 1st place is gonna is gonna put it out, citywide will be Washington DC. Number 1, the federal employees don't wanna come back to work. They wanna stay on vacation. You said Washington DC I I may have misled you, but coming back to the nation's capital is gonna be the place to be. Maybe I have to rethink that. Natalie, actually, great job on Tim Pool last night. The show was fantastic. You you had tremendous amount out there. And, Tim Pool, we love the Tim Pool guys. Just incredible, but great great show last night. Make sure we'll get it up. I think we had it on Garett last night with a huge audience watching and commenting. So, Thank you so much. And, thank you. This this, this one right here is signal right now because the protocols are coming back. So thank you, ma'am. Speaker 1: Thank you. Speaker 0: Joe Allen. Where's my Joe
Saved - September 6, 2023 at 1:26 PM

@EndWokeness - End Wokeness

It’s September 2023 and Biden is wearing a mask again. Mandates are next.

Saved - September 7, 2023 at 5:04 PM

@sophiadahl1 - Sophia Dahl

1/7 Remember what Tedros said back in May 'I declare COVID over':World Health Organization boss says pandemic is no longer a global health emergency Global health leaders said the virus no longer constitutes an emergency https://dailymail.co.uk/health/article-12051131/World-Health-Organization-boss-says-pandemic-no-longer-global-health-emergency.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
The pandemic has been on a downward trend with increasing population immunity and decreasing mortality. The emergency committee recommends declaring an end to the public health emergency of international concern. COVID-19 is not over as a global health threat, as the virus is still present, causing deaths and evolving into new variants. There is a risk of new surges in cases and deaths. It is crucial for countries to not let their guard down, dismantle their systems, or downplay the seriousness of COVID-19.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For more than a year, the pandemic has been on a downward trend with population immunity increasing from vaccination and infection, mortality decreasing and the pressure on health systems easing. This trend has allowed most countries to return to life as we knew it before COVID nineteen. Yesterday, the emergency committee met for the 15th time and recommended to me that I declare an end to the public health emergency of international concern. It's therefore with great hope that I declare COVID nineteen over as a global health emergency. However, that does not mean COVID nineteen is over as a global health threat. This virus is here to stay. It's still killing and it's still changing. The risk remains of new variants emerging that cause new surges in cases and deaths. The worst thing any country could do now is to use this news as a reason to let down its guard to dismantle the systems it has built or to send the message to its people that COVID nineteen is nothing to worry about.
WHO boss says pandemic is no longer a global health emergency The World Health Organization said Friday that COVID-19 no longer qualifies as a global emergency. The UN agency said the virus remains a threat in some parts of the world, though. dailymail.co.uk
Saved - October 3, 2023 at 6:16 PM

@BelvoirPLC - Belvoir

If you watch one video on Covid today, make it this one. This'll make you stop and think….

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video emphasizes the importance of vaccination and the risks associated with being unvaccinated. It repeatedly states that no one is safe from COVID-19 until everyone is vaccinated. The speakers express frustration and anger towards the unvaccinated, suggesting they should be banned from various places and denied healthcare. They argue that the unvaccinated are a threat to society and that their refusal to get vaccinated is causing harm to the economy and the country as a whole. The video also mentions breakthrough cases among the vaccinated but emphasizes that vaccination significantly reduces the risk of severe illness and death. It concludes by urging people to get vaccinated and join the fight against COVID-19.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We wanna make sure that people can discern the truth from the misinformation, and we wanna make sure that everyone understands that no one's safe till everyone's safe. No one is safe. No one is safe. No one is safe. Speaker 1: No one is safe. No Speaker 0: one is safe. No one is safe. No one is safe. Nobody is safe. This is Speaker 2: a post 9 11 axiom. Safer but not yet safe. Speaker 0: No one is safe. No one is safe. No one is safe. No one is safe from COVID nineteen until everyone is safe. Speaker 2: If the whole world isn't safe, none of us are safe. Speaker 0: No one is safe. Speaker 1: No one is safe. Nobody is Speaker 2: safe until we're all safe. Speaker 1: Health experts have been saying nobody is safe. Speaker 0: Nobody is safe until everybody is safe. Nobody is safe. Science just clear. None of us are safe. There is no safety. Speaker 1: No one is safe. No one is safe. No one is safe. Speaker 2: No one is safe until everyone is safe. No one's safe. Speaker 0: Nobody is safe. Safe. Nobody's safe. Speaker 2: No one's safe. We'll never be safe. Until we're all safe. We are never gonna be safe. Speaker 0: 99.5% of people are safe and will survive COVID nineteen. The only positive thing out of this is we should be able to manufacture a lot of seen 10. Nobody will be safe if not everybody is vaccinated. You don't have a choice. As long as not everybody is vaccinated, nobody will be safe. Normalcy We'll see only returns when we've largely vaccinated the entire global population. So Get Speaker 1: the fucking vaccine. You need to get vaccinated. Vaccinated. And if you don't, you are going to die. I know you're vaccinated. You're the smart ones, but you know there's people out there who aren't listening to God and what God wants. You know who they are. Speaker 0: The unvaccinated people. My message to unvaccinated Americans is this. Speaker 2: If you are the unvaccinated, you are the problem. You'll Speaker 0: fucking dead. I'm saying no. Blame. The only people that you can blame are the unvaccinated. Speaker 1: Frankly, we can't trust the unvaccinated. Speaker 0: They should not be part of Polite society. Lunatics who won't take COVID vaccines walking around lawfully unvaccinated are psychotic. If you're willing to walk among us unvaccinated, you are an safe. You have no right not to be vaccinated. You don't have the right to contaminate someone. You can't go around pointing a gun in somebody's face, which is what it is when people are unvaccinated. They are all all idiots and losers. This is a real movement Speaker 2: in this country against the unvaccinated. Jennifer Aniston is cutting non vaccinated people out of her life. Unrepentant, unvaccinated. Speaker 0: They should be removed from the hospital. Those who refuse to be vaccinated should be denied health care. Vaccinated person having a heart attack, yes. Come right on in. We'll take care of you. Unvaccinated guy, rest in peace, wheezy. You're Speaker 2: Some doctors are saying they'll refuse treatment For people who'd scooned not to get the shot. Why are hospital and ICU resources going to them? Morons. Speaker 0: You'll not get the shot. Vaccinated clowns. Idiots who think that they can do their own research. Speaker 3: Don't do any of your own research. Speaker 1: Doing your own research is associated with conspiracy theory safe. Speaker 0: This go it alone approach doing your own research that can have serious consequences. You should get prison time for even questioning the vaccines. Can we all stop saying, I need to do my own research? That phrase, do your own research, 4 words, 4 little words that are hurting America. Doing your own research hurts America. Everybody has a supercomputer in their hand that empowers them to do their own research, and that's the problem. You must not do your own research. There. I need to do my own research. I don't have never understand what that means. I'm doing my own research. Speaker 1: You can't do your own research unless you're a scientist. Safe. Come do your own research. Speaker 2: Maybe you've told yourself you're planning it safe. You just wanna wait and see since this is a new vaccine. Now. Speaker 1: Blow the up and get the vaccine. Speaker 0: Unvaccinated people spread the virus. It's a vaccine, you dopes. Don't be a Get yourself vaccinated. That's just all there is pooped. There's no excuse. No excuse for being unvaccinated. There's no rational and no emotional argument that adds up against getting your damn shot. There's a there's a Speaker 1: But you made a conscious decision not to get the vaccine. I also have natural immunity. So for me, personally, safe. This vaccine poses a greater risk than a benefit. I'm also not a risk to any of you. Let's look at the science. Speaker 0: So we see that the natural infection is given greater protection or slightly greater protection done vaccination. Speaker 1: This is a vaccine that was created to prevent severity of disease and to prevent hospitalizations, but the Steam does not prevent you from getting COVID and does not prevent you from transmitting Oh, my goodness. Reality out. We have seen that stuff. Come on. No. It'll go to Fox safe till everyone's safe. No one is Speaker 0: safe. Safe. When we've poked at, we'll be new. You're gonna be safe from the COVID infected you. Safe. Speaker 2: The virus stopped with every vaccinated person. Speaker 0: Do it so you stop spreading a terrible disease. And that seen. Our key goal is to stop the transmission so that you get almost no almost no, infection going on whatsoever. Expectation for vaccines seems as not to get infected. Speaker 2: A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus. The virus does not infect them. Speaker 0: When the virus gets to you, you stop stopping. You're not gonna catch it. You're not gonna get sick. You're not gonna transmit it. The vaccine is absolutely bulletproof. Speaker 1: Vaccines block you from getting and giving the virus. 100% effective in preventing COVID. Speaker 0: The vaccine prevents you from getting infected. Speaker 1: It is Speaker 2: to keep you from getting it and then spreading it. Speaker 1: We safe. Have the ability to stop COVID in its tracks. Speaker 0: You're not gonna get COVID if you have these vaccinations. Quaidant tests positive for COVID nineteen. When people are vaccinated, they can feel safe that they are not gonna get infected. Doctor Fauci tests positive for COVID nineteen. Speaker 1: Vaccinated people do not carrying the virus, don't get sick. Speaker 0: CDC director tests positive for COVID nineteen. Seeing. Pfizer CEO test positive for COVID. Pfizer CEO test positive for COVID again. CDC director safe. Test positive for COVID again. Fauci test positive for COVID again. Joe Biden test positive for COVID again. Speaker 1: Cases up 258%, safe. The majority of these cases are among the vaccinated, and this area is the most vaccinated part of Massachusetts. Speaker 0: So many fully vaccinated. People are testing positive. Speaker 1: So people here are a bit angry. Speaker 0: We are all really concerned about what this means long term. I was vaccinated, and I got COVID. Safe. Almost everyone we know with vaccinations had at least 1 bout of it. Our vaccines work better, then we could have possibly hoped they would work. Speaker 1: We are not the problem. The problem are the unvaccinated. Speaker 0: The unvaccinated threat. Unvaccinated people are a threat, a direct threat, a threat to all of us. Getting a risk to all of us. Speaker 1: People have a right to be protected from the unvaccinated. Speaker 0: Maybe there should be laws that allow them to be kept out of the building. So at least, thankfully, they're not breathing same error. Their freedom to breathe will diminish. Start firing the unvaccinated. If Speaker 2: you don't vaccinate, you'll be fired. Speaker 0: Time to come down on the unvaccinated. They should be banned from the VA, banned from restaurants, banned from other businesses and colleges. Companies should not treat us as equal. Sedating people under arrest. It Speaker 2: is the unvaccinated that has put America in the place that it is. Speaker 0: We are losing freedom because people are unvaccinated. Forced to unvaccinated. I'm curious that the unvaccinated. Frustrated with Americans. Still not vaccinated. Not to be vaccinated. Seems criminal. Suspects faced. Years behind bars for coughing on police officers. Freedom. For them. Charged with terrorist threats. You have no individual rights when it comes to the vaccine. Speaker 1: Really, you're killing other people. Speaker 0: You're being attacked by unvaccinated. Unvaccinated who aren't wearing masks. It's the unvaccinated who aren't social distancing. It's the unvaccinated going to crowded indoor events. It is not your right as an American citizen to catch and transmit a potentially fatal infection. Don't screw you, Freedom. We can coerce you. Speaker 1: You're not going to be able to travel severe. If someone in your family isn't vaccinated, should you ask them not to show up? Speaker 0: Yes. You really shouldn't have anyone unvaccinated come to dinner. That's just a huge risk. Speaker 1: If you wanna Come out into public. If you wanna live your life, you need to get the vaccination. Speaker 0: It's time for people to see vaccination as literally necessary. You should have To show that you're vaccinated in order to go places. Unvaccinated. Can't travel to the US. Speaker 1: If you're not vaccinated, you're not welcome. Speaker 0: Our patience is wearing thin. Why hasn't the president focused more on taking the Unvaccinated. Refusal has caused all of us. Speaker 2: Continued damage the unvaccinated are doing to themselves and the country. Speaker 0: How come migrants are allowed to come into this country unvaccinated, but world class tennis players are not. Speaker 1: You know Speaker 0: And, back to our lead story, the pandemic of the unvaccinated. Fact is this is a pandemic Speaker 2: of the unvaccinated experts. Call it pandemic of the unvaccinated. Speaker 0: It's still a pandemic of the unvaccinated. The disease of the unvaccinated. Speaker 2: It is the unvaccinated who are the problem. Period. End of story. Speaker 0: The unvaccinated also put our economy at risk. This is a tyranny of the unvaccinated right now. The unvaccinated, not the vaccinated. Unvaccinated. That's the problem. That's the pandemic. The unvaccinated. Pandemic of the unvaccinated. All this is a pandemic of the safe. The only pandemic we have is among the unvaccinated pandemic because the unvaccinated. Speaker 1: When you get the vaccine, you will not die. That's right. That's right. Speaker 0: It's a simple, basic proposition. If you're vaccinated, you are not gonna die. If you're vaccinated, you don't have a risk. It's as simple as black and white. Speaker 1: You are not going to die if you are vaccinated. That's it. Full stop. Speaker 0: You're unvaccinated, you're at risk. You're vaccinated. You're safe. A majority of Americans dying from coronavirus are vaccinated. COVID nineteen isn't the pandemic of the unvaccinated anymore. We didn't really understand the fatality rate. You know, we didn't understand that it's A fairly low fatality rate and that it's a disease mainly of the elderly, kind of like flu is, although a bit different. We We have 2 Americas, an unvaccinated at risk America and a vaccinated America. Speaker 1: I wear my vaccinated necklace all the time to Say I'm vaccinated. Speaker 2: You, the vaccinated, are the last best hope to overcome the unvaccinated minority. Speaker 1: I need you to be my apostle. I need you to go out And talked Speaker 2: about it. We are seeking to enlist you in a benevolent conspiracy to join in the unfinished war against the sins of the unvaccinated. Native. And it's a war forever war. The war against COVID nineteen. Speaker 3: The vaccine hesitancy on Earth 2 has the potential to compromise all of the hard fought progress that we've made here on earth one. Speaker 0: This is the greatest threat to life that we have ever faced. Speaker 1: Metropolitan areas are now banning all private gatherings. This bar owner arrested for reopening illegally. Speaker 0: Unvaccinated. We are looking at a woman of severe illness and death. Death. For yourselves, your families. If the unvaccinated are not to blame, who is? If only we had a vaccine against is. So part of preparing for hurricane season is to get vaccinated now. Everything is more complicated if you're not vaccinated in a hurricane.
Saved - October 27, 2023 at 4:01 PM

@hugh_mankind - New World Odor™

''2 weeks to flatten the curve'' 📉 https://t.co/GQ5uqM6fjK

Saved - October 29, 2023 at 3:51 PM

@AmericazOutlaw - ᴊᴀᴄᴋ ᴅᴀɴɢᴇʀ

NYU Professor Galloway & Former NY Governor Andrew Cuomo go on Bill Maher to ask for “forgiveness” for the harsh lockdowns & killing millions in nursing homes. They go on to say “I was wrong. We were working with imperfect information.” Thoughts? https://t.co/oXueEuqTLB

Video Transcript AI Summary
During COVID, as a board member of my kids' school, I initially supported a strict lockdown policy. However, I now realize that keeping kids out of school for longer caused more harm than the risks involved. We, including myself, the CDC, and the governor, made decisions based on imperfect information. We did our best, but it's important to learn from our mistakes. Let's hold each other accountable, but also show some grace and forgiveness. It was a challenging situation, but we can grow from it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I was on the board of my kids' school during COVID. I wanted a harsher lockdown policy, and in retrospect, I was wrong. The The damage to kids and keeping them out of school longer was greater than the risks. But here's the bottom line: myself, Our great people, the CDC, I'd like to thank the governor, we were all operating with imperfect information and we were doing our best. The It's it's well, so let's but let's learn from it. The let's learn from it. Let's learn from it. Let's hold each other accountable, but let's bring a little bit of grace and forgiveness and that a shit show that was
Saved - November 23, 2023 at 4:50 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In October 2019, Michael Specter warned that the flu has the potential to cause significant fatalities. At the Milken Institute Future of Health Summit, Dr. Fauci's statement caught attention: "2 weeks to slow the spread" was said 6 months prior.

@I_Am_JohnCullen - John Cullen

October, 2019 "Flu is the thing on earth that is most likely to kill many, many people." .. Michael Specter, New Yorker Magazine Dr Fauci said what? (listen carefully..) Milken Institute Future of Health Summit 6 months before, "2 weeks to slow the spread." https://t.co/cBXEcEiNJ2

Video Transcript AI Summary
We're discussing the urgent need for a better flu vaccine that can protect against all types of influenza viruses. To tackle this challenge, we require passionate and talented individuals from diverse backgrounds to collaborate. By combining unconventional thinking, we can find faster solutions. Unlike measles, which remains consistent over time, influenza constantly changes due to mutations. This means that a new vaccine is needed each year to match the circulating virus. Occasionally, there are major changes in the virus caused by mutations or when it jumps species, resulting in a unique situation. Other viral infections like polio, smallpox, and measles do not exhibit this level of variability.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're talking about one of the greatest public health challenges of our lifetime. Speaker 1: Every day, the pandemic clock is ticking. Flu is the thing on Earth that is most likely To kill many, many people. We need a vaccine that is more protective, lasts longer, and will be effective against Any influenza virus. Passionate, talented people coming together Just for this cause is what we need to solve this very important problem. Bringing together people from a wide cross section of backgrounds and disciplines is the most promising way to bring about significant scientific progress. Speaker 0: By putting together nontraditional ways of thinking, that's how we're gonna drive to a faster solution. Speaker 2: Unlike A virus like measles, which if you have a measles virus and you get vaccinated against measles or you get infected with Measles. That you are protected, essentially for life for the simple reason that measles doesn't change from year to year or from decade to decade. Whereas influenza is very unique in that it is a virus, a group of viruses. There are different kinds of influenza a, and let's just focus on Influenza a that tend to we use the terminology drift from season to season and that there are mutations That change it enough so that you really need to get vaccinated each year and you try to anticipate the right match between a vaccine And the virus that will be circulating. And then every once in a while, as Michael alluded to, you have a very dramatic change Either by mutations or by evolutions from, animal, influenzas that jump species, recombine, or what have you, When you have something that's called a shift or a real big change, that's really unique. I mean, the viral infections That we deal with, polio, smallpox, measles, etcetera, don't do that.

@I_Am_JohnCullen - John Cullen

https://t.co/xucrunoWEM

Saved - November 26, 2023 at 8:32 PM

@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra

Barack Obama and Dr. Fauci are ready for the next pandemic. https://t.co/Fjs5ylrvoj

Video Transcript AI Summary
Thanks to the Biden administration and Dr. Fauci, millions of kids in the country have already been vaccinated. If you're still considering it, seek information from trusted sources like your family doctor, pediatrician, or school nurse. They will assure you of its safety and effectiveness. The vaccine is specifically designed for kids. Visit vaccine.gov to find a vaccination location near you, and it's free. It's important to get vaccinated not only for your kids and family but also for the wider community.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thanks to the work of the Biden administration, Doctor. Fauci, we already have millions of kids around the country who have gotten vaccinated which means that if you're still thinking about it, get informed, talk to somebody you trust, Your family doctor, your pediatrician, school nurse, get more information about it. They'll tell you it's safe, it's effective. This is, This vaccine is tailored for kids and then come on down and find a spot to get vaccinated. You can get it for free Just by going to vaccine.gov it will tell you exactly where you can go to get vaccinated and make sure to do it, as you said, For your kids, your entire family as well as for the community at large.
Saved - January 2, 2024 at 4:47 AM

@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones

Breaking: Blue cities and states announce new covid power grab measures! https://t.co/iudgVrFlKk

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses two major COVID developments in 2023. Firstly, blue states and cities in the United States are reintroducing mask mandates due to fearmongering. Secondly, there is talk of a new COVID strain causing heart attacks and myocarditis. The speaker suggests that these health issues have been occurring since the vaccine rollout in early 2021, and even the FDA has acknowledged the link. However, the media is now blaming the new variant for these problems. The speaker claims that the spike protein created by the vaccines is causing viral infections in the heart, leading to myocarditis. They argue that this is part of a depopulation agenda.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, it's the final day of 2023. And there have been 2 massive COVID developments, really the biggest of this year. Officially all over the United States, blue states and blue cities are announcing return to mask, covered protocols, all the same fair mongering. And if you remember back in August, I was told that by TSA whistleblower and war patrol. And now it's officially happening. And by the end of the year, they wanted out of all this out. Now the even bigger development is this. They're now planning a new strain is going around and that it causes myocarditis and heart attacks. And that's why there's all these heart attacks and myocarditis happening. Funny, it's been happening ever since the shots started in early 2021, and it's in the main line literature. It's being caused by the shots, even the Food and Drug Administration has had to admit that. So now they're spinning it all over the news, ABC, CBS. Oh, done, done, done. Holiday heart. You know, the holidays can make you get sad and have a heart attack. But now it's the COVID virus that's causing the heart attacks, but it's the new variant. So the new variant caused the last two and a half years of death all over the world, but people that took the shots. This is the new cover for it. They've got TV ads and PSAs in Europe, Canada, the US, Australia. Hey. It's normal to have heart attacks. Babies have them. Little kids have them. Yeah. You know? Yeah. It's normal that the numbers are increasing. We don't know Fine. And finally, they're saying it's COVID and in a way it is. The so called vaccines make your body create the spike protein. That's the Part that hits the receptor side that does cause a viral infection of the heart. So it is the shots causing a viral infection of the heart that can cause myocarditis and now myocarditis has exploded. So they're telling you it's the wild virus when it's really the body producing the spike protein. That's the delivery system of the virus. This is incredible ladies and gentlemen. The new normal mass heart attacks, mass deaths, Millions dead, myocarditis, all these other health problems, strokes, blood clots, the corners have come out and send record blood clots. The epidemiologists have as well. This is the fact. So this is their power grab. This is their depopulation operation. We'll be covering it all live at infowars.comforward/show. Don't fall for this crap.
Saved - January 17, 2024 at 3:17 PM

@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd

“They never said you won’t get COVID” https://t.co/eaFhK8101T

Video Transcript AI Summary
Vaccination is crucial for protecting oneself and others, allowing society to return to normal. Vaccinated individuals are unlikely to carry or get sick from the virus. Getting vaccinated and receiving booster shots can save lives and prevent the spread of infection. The probability of reducing transmission is believed to be 100%. Taking vaccines not only protects individuals and their families but also breaks the chain of transmission. Vaccinated people do not become infected and cannot spread the virus. However, it was initially unclear if the vaccines would stop transmission, as the data was limited. The speed of scientific progress necessitated quick action.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Not just protecting themselves, but reducing their transmission, to other people and allowing society to get back to normal. Speaker 1: We can kind of almost see the end. We're we're vaccinating so very fast. Our data from the CDCs today suggest, you know, that that vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick. Speaker 2: Getting vaccinated and getting a booster shot when eligible can save your life and protect you your family and friends from getting seriously ill and spreading infection. Speaker 3: What do Speaker 2: you think the probability is? 80%? Speaker 0: Personally, I think it's a 100%. I think that there's a reduction transmission Speaker 4: COVID if you have these vaccinations. Speaker 5: We have all the vaccines we need. We just need our people To take it, a, for their own protection, for the protection of their family, but also to break the chain of a transmission. You wanna be a dead end to the virus. So when the virus gets to you, you stop it. You don't allow it to use you as the stepping to the next person. Speaker 6: Now we know that the vaccines work well enough that the virus stops with every an aided person. A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus. The virus does not infect them. The virus cannot then use that person to go anywhere else. Cannot use a vaccinated person as a host to go get more people. That means the vaccines scenes will get us to the end of this. Speaker 4: But when we looked at the emergency use authorization, which is right on the screen, if you look what Under transmission, this is what was known the moment they were making those things. Can I have the next slide, please? What was known was that the data are, not there limited to assess the effects of the vaccine against transmission of SARS COVID 2. They had no idea. They had no idea if it would stop the infection, yet they were making those statements on the news. The Speaker 3: Pfizer COVID vaccine Test it on stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the Speaker 7: market. If not, please Speaker 3: Say it clearly. If yes, are you willing to share the data with this committee? And I really want straight answer, yes or no, And I'm looking forward to it. Thank you very much. Speaker 8: Regarding the question around, did we know about stopping immunization before, it's entered the market? No. Speaker 9: These, you know, we had to really move at the speed of science
Saved - March 10, 2024 at 11:09 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - DiedSuddenly

CDC Director essentially admits that they plan to have another pandemic in the Fall, and have already prepared a booster for it. https://t.co/fXCiqzoTnf

Video Transcript AI Summary
We need updated flu and COVID vaccines this fall as the virus changes. FDA and CDC are already working on updating the COVID vaccine. Plan ahead for your fall flu shot and COVID vaccine to stay ahead of the virus.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We need to see everyone get an updated flu shot and an updated COVID vaccine. We also shared, on Friday that we and we expect and anticipate there's gonna be an updated COVID vaccine coming this fall. Right? So plan now. Yeah. It's March. So you could think ahead when you're gonna get your flu shot in the fall. You're gonna get another updated COVID vaccine. And the reason for it is because this virus continues to change. That's okay. We can stay one step ahead of it. We have the tools to do it. We just need to use them. So, FDA, CDC has started that process just like we do with the flu shot. We've started that process to update the COVID vaccine already for, this fall. And so we just want folks, again
Saved - March 20, 2024 at 3:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
During the early days of the pandemic, the media's coverage of lockdowns and reopenings was filled with fear-mongering and outrage. They portrayed leaving homes as deadly and called for harsh measures and travel restrictions. Some outlets even advocated for a national quarantine. The media labeled those who wanted to reopen as dangerous and racist. The coverage on reopening schools was also filled with panic porn. The consequences of the lockdowns were devastating, causing learning loss and impacting mental and physical health. Despite the clear consequences, the media still insists that the outside is unsafe. It seems unlikely that the press will ever move on from this narrative.

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

🧵THREAD🧵 “15 days to slow the spread” kicked off four years ago Saturday, sending the media into perhaps its most deranged cycle of my lifetime. I dove back into some of the worst lockdown media coverage from those early days. Buckle in, this one’s long. ⤵️

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

The real worst of the coverage was when states started reopening. The media outrage was palpable. Republicans wanted people to die, we were told. Remember @TheAtlantic’s “Georgia’s Experiment in Human Sacrifice”? You may’ve forgotten how wild the text of it was. I did. https://t.co/vJSpfbSRo8

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

But that wasn’t a one off sentiment. The belief four years ago among the media was that allowing people to leave their homes was tantamount to killing people. @washingtonpost called it a “deadly error” — not in an opinion piece, mind you, but in a “health” news headline. https://t.co/glcV9j2cKK

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

What we should’ve been doing instead, to hear the press tell it, was employing “harsh steps,” @nytimes said. “Americans must be persuaded to stay home” and “travel restrictions should be extended” they said. https://t.co/7MM2v07hum

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

@politico thought the same thing. In their magazine, the outlet called for a “national quarantine” which they dubbed a “common-sense” approach. https://t.co/LKnHLjUU0n

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

@CNN was among the most crazed. They went after the supposed morality behind the “Open it Up” movement, which they called “downright dangerous.” The people who thought it was okay to go outside were “downright dangerous.” https://t.co/631gWX81BQ

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

I want to pause here to point out something important. Yes, Covid killed millions of people. But this wasn’t the bubonic plague we were talking about. And states like Florida were able to safely reopen, as I, @CurtisHouck and others pointed out back in the thick of it. https://t.co/SgtxZOkAAA

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

Anyway, back to the coverage, because it was just so ridiculous. @USATODAY kept with the deadly theme, calling reopenings “Russian roulette.” Again. This to describe letting people go to stores. https://t.co/y5DmCmIWez

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

You can’t overstate the fear mongering from the press. Here’s @TIME giving tips and tricks to how you can stay hidden in your home if your state reopens. The picture selection to accompany these pieces is an editorial choice. https://t.co/HuAvlJAiR0

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

And, of course, reopening was racist. You may remember that, in those halcyon days, everything was — this was the summer of race after all — and reopenings and lockdowns were no exception for @voxdotcom, @AP, @NewsHour & @Salon. https://t.co/AbnIKk8N1G

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

But the craziest example is from @ABC. Whenever I see “analysis” in a headline, particularly about news that intersects with liberal sacred cows, I expect what follows will be preposterous. This was no exception. https://t.co/pg0RLSEsva

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

You may think the 33 word headline from @BusinessInsider is bad, but the photo selection really elevates the embarrassment all involved should feel about the choices made for this piece, in retrospect. https://t.co/kjCDVpvTr3

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

Like the Business Insider piece, lots of outlets really leaned into the panic porn when it came to reopening schools. @Reuters made sure to include the case counts as a counter to Trump in the headline. How they wanted their readers to feel about his comments is clear. https://t.co/fMldWE2Ezq

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

Maybe they were channeling @rweingartin, the head of the teachers association and then-media darling. Remember when kids were going to be fine even if they had to sacrifice because they were “resilient”? I do. https://t.co/wUfvdAdbqz

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

A quick aside: @rweingarten has taken to claiming that she and her org always wanted to keep schools open. It isn’t true. Weingarten long pushed for schools to be closed. This is why I take screenshots. https://t.co/hn60XklVAQ

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

There were lots of other outlets who pushed to close schools. Here’s @CNN, advising their readers that schools weren’t safe for kids. https://t.co/o974lksUEY

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

@ABC fact checked the idea that kids got better faster, calling the claim “misleading.” It wasn’t. Even the Times admitted - again, this isn’t hindsight - around the same time that kids recovered quicker. But ABC wanted to stoke fear. I can’t see another explanation. https://t.co/dpJm2Qawmq

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

@washingtonpost called school reopenings a “fantasy” https://t.co/0svjEV3l7A

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

I’ll let this @guardian headline speak for itself. https://t.co/8czuBqznEN

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

It’s an understatement to say there were consequences to the lockdowns the press cheered for. Learning loss devastated kids. For the rest of America, lockdowns had a huge toll on mental and physical health. https://t.co/X3RZXafWK4

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

None of this should’ve been a surprise. We knew that lockdowns had serious consequences. I wrote about it for @nytopinion…in 2020. https://t.co/s3DKWzKU2y

@DrewHolden360 - Drew Holden

You probably won’t be surprised that, even after the consequence became clear, the media haven’t learned any lessons. The outside still isn’t safe, so say @nytimes, @washingtonpost & @CNN. These were just last summer. Will the press ever get over it? I’ll bet the under. https://t.co/5CwnwKRtR5

Saved - April 3, 2024 at 4:48 AM

@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number

"The greatest perpetrator of misinformation during the pandemic has been the US government." https://t.co/2i1PGicBIC

Video Transcript AI Summary
The United States government has spread misinformation during the pandemic, such as COVID transmission through surfaces, vaccine immunity, and mask effectiveness. The Cochrane review disproves these claims. Myocarditis is more common after vaccination, not infection. Pushing boosters for young people led to FDA experts resigning. Vaccine mandates did not increase vaccination rates. Medical research has been weaponized, with CDC releasing biased studies. Public health officials were dishonest with the American people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The greatest perpetrator of misinformation during the pandemic has been the United States government. Misinformation that COVID was spread through surface transmission, that vaccinated immunity was far greater than natural immunity, that masks were effective. Now we have the definitive Cochrane review. What do you do with that review? Cochrane is the most authoritative evidence body in all of medicine and has been for decades. Do you just ignore it, not talk about it? That myocarditis was more common after the infection than the vaccine. Not true. It's 4 to 28 times more common after the the vaccine. That young people benefit from a booster. Misinformation. Our 2 top experts on vaccines quit the FDA in protest over this particular issue, pushing boosters in young, healthy people. The data was never there. That's why the CDC never disclosed hospitalization rates among boosted Americans under age 50. The vaccine mandates would increase vaccination rates, the George, Mason University study shows it didn't. It did one thing. It created never vaxxers. Over and over again, we've seen something that goes far beyond using your best judgment with the information at hand. We've seen something which is unforgivable, and that is the weaponization of medical research itself. The c CDC putting out their own shoddy studies, like their own study on natural immunity looking at one state for 2 months, when they had data for years on all 50 states, why did they only report that one sliver of data? Why did they salami slice the giant database? Because it gave them the result they wanted. Same with masking study. Well, the data has now caught up in giant systematic reviews, and the public health officials were intellectually dishonest. They lied to the American people. Thank you.
Saved - May 8, 2024 at 11:49 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo admits that the government had no authority to enforce mandates during the pandemic. Society acted voluntarily, leading to reduced trust in government. Leana Wen, a public health expert, is criticized for peddling misinformation and eroding trust. Jen Psaki's comment about Trump sparks controversy. Cuomo also criticizes the Biden administration's handling of the migrant crisis. Fauci's past statements on masks are highlighted.

@EricAbbenante - Eric Abbenante

Former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo is now comfortable telling you the truth about the government's lack of authority to enforce mandates: "Government had no capacity to enforce any of this [mandates]. You must wear a mask. People wore masks in New York. If they said 'I'm not wearing a mask' there was nothing I could do about it. You must close your private business. 'I won't'. There was nothing I could really do about it. It was really all voluntary. It was extraordinary when you think about it. That society acted with that uniformity voluntarily. Because I had no enforcement capacity. So you have a reduced trust in government." Yes, people have a tendency to distrust the government after learning they were lied to for years. Unless you're a Stockholm Syndrome Democrat.

Video Transcript AI Summary
At the start of COVID, people trusted the government's guidelines, but now that trust has decreased. Compliance with new rules would be lower. During the pandemic, people voluntarily followed guidelines like wearing masks and closing businesses, as there was no enforcement. This lack of trust in government complicates future responses to crises. Translation: At the beginning of COVID, people trusted the government's guidelines, but now that trust has decreased. Compliance with new rules would be lower. During the pandemic, people voluntarily followed guidelines like wearing masks and closing businesses, as there was no enforcement. This lack of trust in government complicates future responses to crises.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I believe if government would now say, we just, made a finding that there's a new virus and everyone should, do x, y, and z. The amount of compliance with x, y, and z would be much, much lower than it was at the beginning of COVID because people do not trust the government, especially on this issue the way they did at the beginning. And that would be a complicating factor, right? When you have people who just don't listen because government had no capacity to enforce any of this, You must wear a mask. And people wore masks in New York. But if they said, I'm not wearing a mask, there was nothing I could do about it. You must close your private business. I won't. Well, there was nothing I could really do about it. It was really all voluntary. And it was extraordinary when you think about it, that society acted with that uniformity voluntarily because I had no enforcement capacity. So you have a reduced trust in government.

@EricAbbenante - Eric Abbenante

Thank you to the people who always credit when they share like @_johnnymaga

@_johnnymaga - johnny maga

Andrew Cuomo admits he had no authority to lock down NY during Covid, despite making repeated threats to businesses & constantly fear peddling “It was extraordinary when you think about it—that society acted with that uniformity voluntarily” What a POS

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses how compliance with government mandates regarding COVID-19 would be lower now due to decreased trust. At the start of the pandemic, people followed guidelines voluntarily, even though enforcement was limited. This lack of trust in government complicates future responses to new viruses.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I believe if government would now say, we just, made a finding that there's a new virus and everyone should, do x, y, and z. The amount of compliance with x, y, and z would be much, much lower than it was at the beginning of COVID because people do not trust the government, especially on this issue the way they did at the beginning. And that would be a complicating factor, right? When you have people who just don't listen because government had no capacity to enforce any of this, You must wear a mask. And people wore masks in New York. But if they said, I'm not wearing a mask, there was nothing I could do about it. You must close your private business. I won't. Well, there was nothing I could really do about it. It was really all voluntary. And it was extraordinary when you think about it, that society acted with that uniformity voluntarily because I had no enforcement capacity. So you have a reduced trust in government.

@EricAbbenante - Eric Abbenante

Yes that was Leana Wen that Cuomo was talking to. She deserved her own clip:

@EricAbbenante - Eric Abbenante

Leana Wen's remarkable revisionist history, aka CYA: "The public health and scientific community has a lot to blame. Because at some point essentially people got the message that if you care about public health at all, or your fellow citizens, you have to be masking. You have to believe in masks and vaccines. If you are not doing these things, or are even questioning whether we should have mandates, then you are somehow Anti-science or Anti-public health. There were topics that we now know, they're not controversial, they're more debatable. As in we should have a robust scientific conversation around them. For example: Natural immunity. Which actually is a thing, but for a long time it was taboo to bring it up for fear that you might be called an anti-vaxxer. So I think that public trust has been eroded by people who are peddling misinformation and disinformation. The people in the scientific community who did not do a very good job of separating fact from opinion, also helped erode that trust." You realize you're describing yourself, right Leana Wen? Smash cut to 5 separate hypocritical examples: 1. "The vaccine is the ticket back to pre-pandemic life. The window to do that is really narrowing" 2. Comparing unvaccinated to driving while intoxicated. 3. The Biden administration should have gone further with their mandates. 4. Supporting the indoor mask requirement because "We can't trust the unvaccinated" 5. Use the mandates to withhold freedoms from the unvaccinated. I know it's 2024 Leana. But you kept using the wrong pronouns. "They" "Them" "The people" No, YOU did this. YOU advocated for mandated medical apartheid. YOU eroded trust. YOU peddled disinformation. And YOU should be ashamed of yourself.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The public health and scientific community are to blame for the erosion of public trust by labeling those who question mandates as anti-science. The speaker believes natural immunity should be discussed openly. They suggest treating the choice to remain unvaccinated like driving while intoxicated, advocating for stricter measures. The speaker supports the CDC's indoor mask requirement for both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. They urge the Biden administration to incentivize vaccination by granting more freedoms to the vaccinated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I actually think this is one where the public health and scientific community has a lot to blame. Because at some point, they began essentially people got the message then if you care about public health at all or your fellow citizens, you have to be masking. You have to believe in masks and vaccines. If you are not doing these things or are even questioning whether we should have mandates, then you are somehow anti science or anti public health. There were topics that we now know are actually, they're not controversial, but they're more debatable as in we should have a robust scientific conversation around them. For example, natural immunity, which actually is a thing. But for a long time, it was taboo to bring it up for fear that you might be called an anti vaxxer. And so I think that public trust has been eroded, yes, by people who are perpetuating misinformation and disinformation. But I think that the people in the scientific community who did not do a very good job of separating fact from opinion also helped to erode that trust. Clear to them that the vaccine is the ticket back to pre pandemic life. And the window to do that is really narrowing. We need to start looking at the choice to remain unvaccinated the same as we look at driving while intoxicated. That you have the option to not get vaccinated if you want, but then you can't go out in public. I don't think it goes far enough. I think this is what's needed in the middle of a pandemic. In fact, I think the Biden administration, if anything, could have gone even further. The honor code was never going to work, that when vaccinated and unvaccinated people are mixing, unless there is proof of vaccination, everybody should still be wearing masks. And so I actually support what the CDC is now doing, which is going back to this indoor mask requirement, because frankly, we know that we can't trust the unvaccinated, that they have been walking around without masks. And in fact, that's what led the surge that we're seeing. How are we going to incentivize people to actually get the vaccine? So that's why I think the CDC and the Biden administration needs to come out a lot bolder and say, if you're vaccinated, you can do all these things, hear all these freedoms that you have. Because otherwise, people are going to go out and enjoy these freedoms anyway.

@EricAbbenante - Eric Abbenante

Today: Jen Psaki fantasizes about Trump dying

@EricAbbenante - Eric Abbenante

Jen Psaki on Morning Joe: "Maybe Donald Trump will go away. Maybe he'll go to jail. Maybe he will die. Not to be too morbid. But maybe. He's not a young man." Instead of focusing on how to make the country better, Democrats fantasize about Trump in prison or dying. They hate Trump more than they love America.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Many people want to be near power and believe that Donald Trump may eventually leave office, whether through jail or death due to his age.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think many of them wanna be close to power. They also assume or have this thought in their mind that maybe Donald Trump will go away. Maybe he'll go to jail. Maybe he will die, not to be too morbid, but maybe I mean, he's not a young man.

@EricAbbenante - Eric Abbenante

It's an Andrew Cuomo Daily Double, this time on the migrant crisis:

@EricAbbenante - Eric Abbenante

Former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo with a startling and honest rant about the Biden administration's [illegal] migrant crisis: "We now have a migrant problem. And that's new. I've been in and out of government all my life. This is the worst government blunder that I have seen in my entire life! You have the federal government which is where it starts, with a sign that says 'Come to the United States of America, and claim Asylum.' And two million people come, of course! From Venezuela, Honduras, and Guatemala. They get to the border, and they say 'Where do you want to go?' and they say 'I want to go to New York!' What are they going to say? I want to go to Nevada? New York State says to them you can only go to New York City. Only New York City, why!? Because politically, for their politics they want the problem in New York City, and they don't want the political problem in the rest of the state. NYC has over 100k migrants who have come to the city. And NYC has to provide the housing and the education and the medical care. It makes no sense. Then the check comes. Mayor Adams says 'Federal government you should pick up the tab' Federal government says 'I left my wallet at home'" Then the federal government turns to you, the taxpayer, and says 'You pay the bill'.

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a migrant crisis in New York City, with over 100,000 migrants needing housing, education, and medical care. Mayor Adams wants the federal government or the state to cover the costs, but they refuse. The burden falls on New York City taxpayers, adding to existing issues like congestion pricing, crime, and homelessness. The speaker criticizes the government for not taking responsibility for the problem they created.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We now have a migrant problem. And that's new. And that's what I wanna talk to you about today. Because I've been in and out of government all my life. I served in the federal government with Bill Clinton. I worked with David Dinkins, attorney general governor. This is the worst government blunder I have seen in my entire life. You have the federal government, which is where it starts, standing at the border with a sign that says, come to the United States of America and claim asylum. And 2,000,000 people come, of course, from Venezuela and Honduras and Guatemala, and they get to the border and they say, where do you wanna go? And they say, I wanna go to New York. What are they gonna say? I wanna go to Nevada? They get to New York. New York State says to them, you can only go to New York City. Only New York City. Not the Hudson Valley, not upstate New York, not Long Island, only New York City. Why? Because, politically, for their politics, they want the problem in New York City, and they don't want the political problem in the rest of the state. But it makes no sense. Now New York City has over 100,000 migrants who have come to the city. And New York City has to provide the housing and the education and the medical care. It makes no sense. Then the check comes. You know when you're in the restaurant and they put the check in the table, nobody moves, everybody just looks at it, Everybody puts their hands in their pocket. Mayor Adams says, federal government, you should pick up the tab. You started this. Federal government says, I left my wallet at home. Mayor Adam says, well then, state of New York, you should at least at least split the bill with us because we took care of the entire problem. And the state says, no, I'm not going to pay 50%. I'll pay something, but I'm not gonna pay 50%. That is wrong. And mayor Adams needs our support. That's our state government. That's your assemblyman. That's your state senator. Why should the New York City taxpayers pay this alone? If I was asking, I would say, the state should pay 100% of the cost because New York took care of 100% of the problem. And now, you want New York City payers taxpayers to pay for this On top of congestion pricing, on top of crime, on top of homeless, on top of the highest in the United States of America.

@EricAbbenante - Eric Abbenante

Hot off the presses: https://immunetothesystem.com/2024/05/07/disgraced-former-new-york-mayor-says-the-quiet-part-out-loud-about-the-scamdemic/

Disgraced Former New York Mayor Says the Quiet Part Out Loud About the Scamdemic https://twitter.com/EricAbbenante/status/1787990343780061424 You may know Andrew Cuomo from his father Former NY Gov. Mario Cuomo, or his brother and failed CNN host Chris Cuomo, or from killing grandparents with his policies during the scamdemic. Andrew's a real family guy, if you don't include those sexual harassment allegations from 2020. Talking with fellow advocate of Mandated medical… immunetothesystem.com

@EricAbbenante - Eric Abbenante

Fauci himself telling you why masks do not work: https://t.co/PGOXf0BXPk

@EricAbbenante - Eric Abbenante

The most comprehensive collection of Fauci describing why masks don't work (2003-March 8th 2020) Includes Fauci describing those wearing masks and using disinfectant as "on the fringe" #FauciFilm https://t.co/IQTgduxAjZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is no need for masks in the United States currently. Wearing a mask is not necessary for normal activities like going to work or school. The use of masks and gloves must be done correctly to be effective. It is advised to walk away from someone coughing or sneezing rather than wearing a mask. Wearing a mask during an outbreak may provide some comfort but does not offer complete protection.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's no need to panic nor any need to do anything different. People ask, should I be wearing a mask? No. Not at all. But at this point in time, we do not need masks in the United States in the normal intercourse that we have in society, walking around, going to work, going to school. We do not need masks. So for someone to try and sell someone a mask and say you really do need a mask, that is not in accordance with the public health recommendations. To go to Japan, you would not be wearing a mask because for a number of reasons. We don't have a situation here in the United States which would warrant a mask, as I've mentioned, to several callers. Speaker 1: There's a photo here of, I guess, an airline attendant for a Thai airlines in Speaker 2: Right. Speaker 1: In Thailand, I guess, with 2 bottles of disinfectant and a mask. Does does this prove have any effect? Speaker 0: Again, there's a there's a wide variability in, the compulsiveness of people. Like, if I saw somebody walking down the street in front of the Capitol here with a mask and and a and a and a and a disinfectant sprayer, I would think that they were a little bit on the fringe. Speaker 3: People who feel for their personal protection they have to wear these masks, one has to change those barriers several times for them to be effective both in the transmission and the reception of any communicable disease. Speaker 0: Gloves and masks, and you're absolutely correct. If not used correctly, it really doesn't make sense to use them at all, particularly in understanding the right seal, etcetera. Speaker 4: Somebody's sitting next to me and they're coughing. Should I say, look. I'm sorry, but I'm susceptible to your thing and just move away. Do you ever have this problem? Speaker 0: I I do. What do Speaker 4: you put a mask on? You put, like, a gauze thing on? Or Speaker 0: No. I don't. But Speaker 4: And the best way for me to prevent getting an infectious disease and having to have you as my doctor is what? Wearing a mask? No. No. No. You do that? If somebody's I can see they're ready ready to sneeze or cough, walk away. Speaker 2: You avoid all the paranoid aspects and do something positive. Right now in the United States, people should not be walking around with masks. You're sure of it? Because people are listening really No. Closely to this. Right now, people should not be walking. There's no reason to be walking around with a mask. When you're in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better, and it might even block a droplet, but it's not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is.

@EricAbbenante - Eric Abbenante

https://t.co/8UObEN0EQm

@EricAbbenante - Eric Abbenante

Immune to the System Live - Andrew Cuomo Admits to the Scamdemic https://t.co/B1am1ZAE3l

Saved - May 30, 2024 at 12:35 PM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

Every aspect of COVID was a lie. https://t.co/pKz7YQpY8i

Saved - July 10, 2024 at 3:27 AM

@CartlandDavid - (Honest/Ethical/Safe Dr) David Cartland

Dr. McCullough Issues Chilling COVID Vaccine Forecast “We need to be concerned for 5 to 15 years after the last shot because these are genetic products.” “We’re seeing late blood clots and cardiac arrests years after the shots.” ⁦@drcole12⁩ https://t.co/OweNUWA2xP

Video Transcript AI Summary
Residual effects from one or two COVID shots can include late blood clots and cardiac arrests years later. The mRNA and spike protein from the shots can linger in the body, causing various health issues like heart and brain damage, blood clots, and immunologic problems. A spike detox program is recommended to address these concerns.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are there residual effects if you've only gotten one shot or 2 shots and never get another one? There are. We're seeing now late blood clots and cardiac arrests, you know, years after the shots. I testified in congress, Joe, January 2024. I cited the FDA guidance. You know, we need to be concerned for 5 to 15 years after the last shot because these are genetic products. The messenger RNA is long lasting. The spike protein, even more long lasting. With all these injections, so many people are loaded with the Wuhan spike protein. This is the spine on the surface of the virus. It goes everywhere in the body. It causes heart damage, brain damage, causes blood clots, immunologic problems, may cause cancer, And so it is imperative that we consider a platform of base spike detoxification. I was the first to publish that. 2 peer reviewed papers now, you know, offered and available to people through the wellness company. It's called the ultimate spike detox.
Saved - September 22, 2024 at 11:38 PM

@DonnaPrissyrn1 - savage daughter

There will be more to come…..better brace yourselves https://t.co/GGdcnFClft

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ron Berkeley, owner of the Penguins, had a son named Andrew Berkeley, an aspiring film producer. Andrew was found unresponsive in his apartment in 2020. The day before, he was scheduled to have lunch with Quincy Brown, Diddy's adopted son. Andrew was 27 years old when he died. The speaker alludes to the "27 club" and asks if the audience remembers what Chester Bennington was trying to do. The speaker then shows Andrew Berkeley's grave.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright, Diddy. Let's connect a few more dots. And this one's for the people that, know a few things because it gets a little weird. Ready? Alright. My last video, I showed you Ron Berkeley, the owner of the Penguins, and Diddy. Well, Ron had a son. The aspiring film producer, Andrew Berkeley, who was found unresponsive in his apartment back in 2020. The day before, he was supposed to have lunch with this man, Quincy Brown, who is Diddy's adopted son. Now here's where it gets weird. Andrew was 27 when he died. If you don't know what the 27 club is, now would be a good time to catch up. Now who remembers what Chester Bennington was trying to do? And to make it worse, this is his grave. Y'all stay safe.
Saved - December 21, 2024 at 5:09 PM

@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen

Covid was planned years in advance - how do we know this? They told us. https://t.co/Q8NlFDdLB6

Video Transcript AI Summary
A highly infectious virus could kill over 10 million people in the coming decades, especially if we face an airborne pandemic without proper preparedness. Future administrations will inevitably confront pandemic challenges, making prevention and preparedness a top priority. With Trump as president, his impulsive and fact-averse approach could exacerbate the situation during a major epidemic. The likelihood of another pandemic is high, as seen with the emergence of a new coronavirus. There is potential for outbreaks from novel viruses, such as an avian virus in China, which could lead to the rapid development and self-administration of vaccines using RNA sequencing technology.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If anything kills over 10,000,000 people in the next few decades, it's most likely to be a highly infectious virus. Some if if we get an airborne pandemic, if we haven't built ahead of time some some structures to deal with this, millions of people could be adversely, impacted. But also there will be a surprise outbreak. The next administration that there's no doubt in anyone's mind that they will be faced with the challenges that their predecessors were faced with. Pandemic prevention and preparedness is gonna end up being, whether the administration likes it or not, a priority, a top priority. Trump is now president. When he faces his first major epidemic as his predecessors have, he will likely project his impulsivity, xenophobia, and cavalier attitude towards facts to over 52,000,000 followers. We may yet again have another pandemic, and it is almost inevitable that we will have another pandemic. Welcome to event 201. Of what's looking like it will be a severe pandemic. A new coronavirus. Why don't we blow the system up and then say, hey. Everyone in the world should get this new vaccine we haven't given to anyone yet. But it is not too crazy to think that an outbreak of an, novel avian virus could occur in in China somewhere. We could get the RNA sequence from that and print those vaccines on a patch and self administer.
Saved - December 30, 2024 at 6:33 AM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

Covid was planned years in advance - how do we know this? They told us. https://t.co/gFOcWocLy7

Video Transcript AI Summary
If a highly infectious virus is to cause over 10 million deaths in the coming decades, it is likely due to a pandemic. Without proper preparedness, a new airborne outbreak could significantly impact millions. Future administrations will inevitably face challenges similar to those of their predecessors, making pandemic prevention a top priority. The current administration will confront its first major epidemic, potentially influenced by impulsive and fact-averse attitudes. The likelihood of another severe pandemic is high, as seen with the emergence of a new coronavirus. There is a possibility of a novel avian virus outbreak, which could lead to rapid vaccine development and self-administration.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If anything kills over 10,000,000 people in the next few decades, it's most likely to be a highly infectious virus. Speaker 1: Some if if we get an airborne pandemic, if we hadn't built ahead of time some some structures to deal with this, millions of people could be adversely, impacted. Speaker 0: But also there will be a surprise outbreak. The next administration that there's no doubt in anyone's mind that they will be faced with the challenges that their predecessors were faced with. Speaker 1: Pandemic prevention and preparedness is gonna end up being, whether the administration likes it or not, a priority, a top priority. Speaker 2: Trump is now president. When he faces his first major epidemic as his predecessors have, he will likely project his impulsivity, xenophobia, and cavalier attitude towards facts to over 52,000,000 followers. Speaker 0: We may yet again have another pandemic, and it is almost inevitable that we will have another pandemic. Welcome to event 201. Of what's looking like it will be a severe pandemic. Speaker 1: A new coronavirus. Why don't we blow the system up and then say, hey. Everyone in the world should get this new vaccine we haven't given to anyone yet. Speaker 3: But it is not too too crazy to think that an outbreak of an, novel avian virus could occur in in China somewhere. We could get the RNA sequence from that and print those vaccines on a patch and self administer.
Saved - January 29, 2025 at 5:36 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

Meanwhile in New York City. People have now, collectively, gone mad. I think I mean that literally. https://t.co/NCkw9OhIVk

Saved - March 2, 2025 at 1:19 AM

@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg

BREAKING: Former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo announces he is running for New York City mayor, admits the city is a crime-ridden mess. "Our New York City is in trouble..." "You feel it when you walk down the street and try not to make eye contact with a mentally ill homeless person."

Video Transcript AI Summary
New York City is in crisis due to failed political leadership. We see it in homelessness, violence, and economic decline. But New Yorkers can solve this, just like we overcame COVID. I've served at all levels of government and know how to make a positive difference. As governor, we achieved a higher minimum wage, gun violence protection, marriage equality, and paid family leave. We invested in infrastructure, like LaGuardia Airport and the Mario M. Cuomo Bridge. My plan is to address the homeless with professional help, increase police presence to fight crime, improve subway safety, build affordable housing, and invest in job training. We must combat antisemitism and ensure a government that serves working people. I'm running for mayor to save our city, offering experience and a commitment to action. Let's fight for New York together.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello. I'm Andrew Cuomo. Let me start by telling you what you already know. New York City is the greatest city in the world. There is no other place like it. And as in life, we have had times when we are at our shining best. And there are times when we struggle and endure great hardship. But we also know that we can handle a crisis because we have. We recently did it together through COVID. And we know that the first step towards solving a problem is having the strength, having the courage to recognize it. And we know that today our New York City is in trouble. You feel it when you walk down the street and try not to make eye contact with a mentally ill homeless person or when the anxiety rises up in your chest as you're walking down into the subway. You see it in the empty storefronts, the graffiti, the grime, the migrant influx, the random violence. The city just feels threatening, out of control, and in crisis. These conditions exist not as an act of God, but rather as an act of our political leaders. Or more precisely, the lack of intelligent action by many of our political leaders. But New Yorkers know the simple answer of what to do when there's a crisis in leadership. You lead, you act, you do. I had the honor to serve the public in every level of government. In my twenties, with my father when he was governor, with mayor David Dinkins on homelessness, with president Bill Clinton as secretary of housing and urban development where we worked with cities all across the nation, and as New York state attorney general, and as your governor. I know government can make a positive difference because we did. Was it easy? No. But together we achieved historic progressive accomplishments. We did things they said couldn't be done. We changed lives by setting the highest minimum wage in the nation. A 66% increase. We saved lives by enacting the toughest gun violence protection laws in America. We created new families by leading the nation in passing marriage equality, which established a new civil right for the LGBTQ community and set a new standard for the country. We created the best paid family leave program, enshrined Roe v Wade into state law three years before Trump's Supreme Court ended a woman's right to control her own body, enacted the most aggressive green economy program in the country, and highest minority business participation. We showed that government can actually work and get things done. Big, hard, important things and get them done well. A new LaGuardia Airport that went from the worst in the country to the best. The beautiful new Moynihan Train Station. A new Second Avenue subway line, a new Kosciusko Bridge, and the largest infrastructure project in the nation done on time and on budget, the Mario M Cuomo bridge. And on top of it all, we faced COVID, which was an historic life and death challenge. And we had it first and worst with no warning. We were on our own, and we were pushed to our limits. But we got through it together and we led the nation. We didn't do these things because they were easy. They weren't. They were hard but they were necessary. And today, it is necessary to launch a bold action plan to turn New York City around to save our city. We now walk down the street passing homeless people living in garbage. And it's become so commonplace that we have become conditioned to think that it is okay. That there's nothing we can do about it. No. It's wrong. It is not advancing civil rights to abandon seriously mentally ill people to the street, allowing them to endanger themselves or others. We are better than that and they deserve better than that. We must get them the professional help they need. That is the caring, the loving thing to do. That is what New Yorkers believe is the right thing to do and that is what a competent effective government must do. We must attack the crime problem. After politicians have been minimizing the need for police and cutting funding, we must acknowledge the simple truth that they are just plain wrong, deadly wrong. They set us back and we must now return to actually fighting crime. Let's remember what mayor David Dinkins did when he took office and we had a crime problem. He hired 6,000 new police officers, a 40% increase in force. While today we have fewer cops for a larger city. We need more police and specialized units, and law enforcement must focus on the small number of recidivists who commit the large number of crimes. We must also restore a relationship of mutual trust and respect between the police and the community. The police have been devalued, and today people don't even want to apply to be police officers. That must change. And our subway system, it was a visionary achievement, demonstrating New York at its best. They began construction in 1900, and in just four years built a system that went from City Hall to 140 Fifth Street in Manhattan with 28 stops, including Grand Central and Times Square. Remarkable, really. Government worked and the subways were safe. But today, people stand with their backs against the walls, away from the tracks and away from each other. Wary, on guard, afraid they might be the next victim. Afraid of New York at its worst. Why? Because once again, government leadership has failed to perform a basic function, public safety. We need a significant presence of real police, not publicity stunts with short term efforts. A permanent significant increase by the city and state, more NYPD, MTA police, state police, whatever is necessary to make our subway safe twenty four hours a day. Safe as an alternative to driving. Safe for our working men and women. And safe for my daughters and for yours. And we must bring order to the chaos of e bikes on our streets and sidewalks. Pedestrians are getting needlessly hurt and even killed. It must end. We must stop talking and actually start building thousands of new affordable units and create thousands of good jobs in the process. Look around you. We know how to build. We built the greatest city on the planet. We built the Empire State Building in one year in the middle of the Great Depression. It is basic competence. Government just has to get out of its own way and get it done. Our public housing is fifty, sixty years old. Many developments have open areas. We should be transforming them on a large scale basis to modern mixed income communities. We did it at HUD twenty five years ago. Cities across the country have done it, and we can too. It's long overdue. We must do more to advance social justice, and a top priority must be investing in training and jobs rather than jails. Many have said it. Now it's time to do it. We must provide economic alternatives for young minority men now turning to crime. Private employment partnerships, vocational training, apprentice programs, positive opportunities. We can do it and we will do it. The tragic situation in The Middle East generates strong opinions, understandably. It is a terrible story of human loss and suffering. But nothing justifies racism and antisemitism. We have the largest Jewish population outside of Israel. They are our neighbors and friends. They are our family, literally. They helped build this city. It is their home, and they must feel safe. Our New York City should not be tolerating any harassment or disparagement of our Jewish brothers and sisters and certainly not from our elected officials. In fact, they should be condemning it. The law must be aggressively enforced and now New York should go even further and be at the forefront leading the fight against the global rise of anti Semitism. But to do any of this, we need a government that can actually perform. We need a government with leadership that can take a stand and get things done intelligently, professionally, efficiently, effectively, and do it now. To me, the founding premise of a progressive Democratic party is all about serving working men and women. But the cruel irony is they are the ones now paying the highest price for New York's failed Democratic leadership. The affordability crisis, the madness of the mass transit system mainly affects the poor and middle class, and 75 of the victims of crime are black and brown. This is not progressive policy, but in fact regressive policy. FDR, John Kennedy, LBJ, Mario Cuomo, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama taught us what it meant to have a true progressive government. It wasn't about rhetoric but results. Look at the word. Progressive government makes progress. They focused on issues that mattered to people in their day to day lives. Issues that were relevant to them. And then they actually made life better for people. And that is what Democrats must do once again. New York birthed the original progressive movement and it worked. It lifted this city, this state, this nation to new heights and it is time for its rebirth and the place is New York and the time is now. My philosophy as an elected official is simple. I work for you, not the politicians and not the special interests. I work as hard as you do, twenty four seven. I know what needs to be done and I know how to do it. Experience matters. Leading New York City in the midst of a crisis is not the time or the place for on the job training. Did I always do everything right in my years of government service? Of course not. Would I do some things differently knowing what I know now? Certainly. Did I make mistakes? Some painfully? Definitely. And I believe I learned from them and that I am a better person for it. And I hope to show you that every day. But I promise you this, I know what needs to be done and I know how to do it. And I will give it my all to get the job done. And it will get done. And I will work with anyone who wants to work for the benefit of New York. I will cooperate and collaborate on any and every level. I have worked with president Trump in many different situations. And I hope president Trump remembers his hometown and works with us to make it better. But make no mistake, I will stand up and fight for New York. I have done it before and I will do it again. I will fight Washington and Albany to make sure we get our fair share of funding and to protect the rights and values that New Yorkers hold dear. That we believe that any discrimination by race, color, or creed is anti American. We do not harbor criminals, but we believe in lawful intelligent immigration because we are a city of immigrants. We believe good government helps people lift themselves up to reach their full potential, and that then raises us all. We believe integrity in government is essential to ensure opportunity and justice for all. My friends, we can save our city. We are New Yorkers. We are a special breed. You have to be to live in this town. We are New York tough. Knock us down and we get back up and we are then stronger and smarter for the experience. That is who we are. We survived nine eleven, the economic attack of two thousand seven, hurricanes, floods, super storms, deadly diseases. We are a people built from the greatest talents from all over the globe. We can do anything when we are together. But time is short and we must do it now. We must do it not just for the sake of New Yorkers. We must do it because New York stands for something bigger. At this time when the nation is searching for its soul, divided as never before, questioning our democratic values, questioning the very role of government and the balance of power, New York must show the way forward and remind the nation of who we are because it all started here. This was the epicenter. It is this country's past and it forecasts the future. New York says that we can't run from each other, but rather we must turn towards each other. That our diversity is not a weakness, but in fact our diversity is our greatest strength. That our city brings people together from all around the world in one place, one dense place, 8,000,000 people on 300 square miles. A cauldron of humanity, sharing ideas, celebrating cultures, exchanging experiences, exciting the imagination, creating a collective energy, a community with a spirit of inclusion not exclusion, acceptance not rejection, and love not hate. Our founding fathers expressed their vision for America in three words. E pluribus unum, out of many one. We say it in three words, New York City. And that my friends is what makes this city unique. The place, the space that is the heart of the American dream and an international phenomenon. That is New York at its best. As the great Eby White said, New York is to the nation what the white church spire is to the village, the visible symbol of aspiration and faith. The white plume saying the way is up. I am not saying this is going to be easy. It won't be easy. But I know we can turn the city around. And I believe I can help. And that is why I announced my candidacy today for mayor of New York City. I am a lifelong New Yorker and I love New York. And I want New York to not only survive, but for New York to thrive for my children and for yours. So now the only question is, are you ready to fight to save our city? I know that I am. Let's do it. Let's do it together, and let's do it now.
Saved - March 2, 2025 at 1:37 AM

@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸

I sped up to the end of this windbags 17 minutes to get to his announcement at the end! Former Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D-NY) announces that he would be running for NYC Mayor. New York do better! https://t.co/NfUhQdhAQg

Video Transcript AI Summary
New York City is the greatest city in the world, but it's currently facing a crisis. We feel it in the streets, the subways, the empty storefronts, and the random violence. This isn't an act of God, but a result of poor political leadership. However, New Yorkers know how to handle a crisis: we lead, we act, we do. Throughout my career in public service, I've seen government make a positive difference. As governor, we achieved historic progressive accomplishments: raising the minimum wage, enacting tough gun laws, passing marriage equality, creating paid family leave, and enshrining Roe v Wade into state law. New York City is the heart of the American dream. I believe we can turn the city around, and I can help. That's why I'm announcing my candidacy for mayor of New York City. I love New York, and I want it to thrive.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm Andrew Cuomo. Let me start by telling you what you already know. New York City is the greatest city in the world. There is no other place like it. And as in life, we have had times when we are at our shining best. And there are times when we struggle and endure great hardship. But we also know that we can handle a crisis because we have. We recently did it together through COVID. And we know that the first step towards solving a problem is having the strength, having the courage to recognize it. And we know that today our New York City is in trouble. You feel it when you walk down the street and try not to make eye contact with a mentally ill homeless person or when the anxiety rises up in your chest as you're walking down into the subway. You see it in the empty storefronts, the graffiti, the grime, the migrant influx, the random violence. The city just feels threatening, out of control, and in crisis. These conditions exist not as an act of God, but rather as an act of our political leaders or more precisely, the lack of intelligent action by many of our political leaders. But New Yorkers know the simple answer of what to do when there's a crisis in leadership. You lead, you act, you do. I had the honor to serve the public in every level of government. In my twenties, with my father when he was governor, with mayor David Dinkins on homelessness, with president Bill Clinton as secretary of housing and urban development where we worked with cities all across the nation, and as New York state attorney general, and as your governor. I know government can make a positive difference because we did. Was it easy? No. But together, we achieved historic progressive accomplishments. We did things they said couldn't be done. We changed lives by setting the highest minimum wage in the nation, a 66% increase. We saved lives by enacting the toughest gun violence protection laws in America. We created new families by leading the nation in passing marriage equality, which established a new civil right for the LGBTQ community and set a new standard for the country. We created the best paid family leave program, enshrined Roe v Wade into state law three years before Trump's Supreme Court ended a woman's right to control her own body, enacted the most aggressive green economy program in the country, and highest minority business participation. We showed that government can in three words, New York City. And that, my friends, is what makes this city unique. The place, the space that is the heart of the American dream and an international phenomenon. That is New York at its best. As the great Eby White said, New York is to the nation what the white church spire is to the village, the visible symbol of aspiration and faith, the white plume saying the way is up. I am not saying this is going to be easy. It won't be easy, but I know we can turn the city around. And I believe I can help. And that is why I announced my candidacy today for mayor of New York City. I am a lifelong New Yorker, and I love New York. And I want New York to not only survive, But for new
Saved - July 7, 2025 at 1:28 AM

@mazemoore - MAZE

Fauci was wrong or lying about everything.https://t.co/pHg5XsLB5z

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes criticism of them is an attack on science. They stated vaccinated people don't need to worry about serious illness or transmission, but later acknowledged fully vaccinated people can transmit the infection. Masks were described as working "at the margins, maybe ten percent." School closures were considered an appropriate approach initially, but remote learning may have "forever damaged" kids, though the speaker doesn't believe it's "irreparably damaged anyone." The speaker claims they didn't recommend lockdowns, but recommended shutting the country down to the president, knowing it would have serious economic consequences. The speaker suggests the virus originated from the animal-human interface in wet markets, but that the place of origin was not within the market itself. Another intelligence arm concluded COVID began with a lab leak in China. The speaker denies the NIH funded gain of function research in the Wuhan Institute, while others claim NIH funded research that made a bat coronavirus more contagious. The speaker denies that this is gain of function.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But they're really criticizing science because I represent science. Speaker 1: If you're vaccinated, you really don't need to worry about getting it in a way that's serious or transmitting. Speaker 0: That is true. That is correct, Chris. It'll lead to protect you completely against infection, and the chances are very likely that you'll not be able to transmit it to other people. The risk is extremely low of transmitting it to anybody else. Full stock vaccinated people are clearly capable of transmitting the infection. When you're in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better. If people are not wearing masks, then maybe we should be mandating it. I often myself wear two masks. Speaker 2: And I'm quoting you now. At the population level, masks work at the margins maybe ten percent. To hear that they only work at the margins maybe ten percent would make a lot of people ask, okay. Then why was I wearing a mask? Speaker 0: You're really attacking not only doctor Anthony Fauci, you're attacking science when you say that this is gonna go away tomorrow like magic when you know that there's no chance it's gonna just disappear. We hope this just goes away, burns itself out. Speaker 3: So my question is why weren't you straight with the American people about this to begin with? Speaker 0: So the bottom line is it's a guesstimate. I gave a range. Speaker 3: It seemed in that quote to suggest that you were basing your your recommendation on polling and what people could accept. Is that not what you meant? Speaker 0: No. I mean, it's it's a bit of that. Speaker 2: We're seeing all of these school closures around the country. Is that the right move for children and families? Speaker 0: Yeah. No. And I think what's going on right now is is generally an appropriate approach. You wanna start doing something to socially distance yourself. How dramatic that is, closing schools and doing other things should be proportionate. And it went too far that particularly for kids who who couldn't go to school except remotely, that it's forever damaged them. Well, I don't think it's forever irreparably damaged anyone. Speaker 4: The US Surgeon General has called it an urgent public health crisis, a devastating decline in the mental health of kids across the country. According to the CDC, the rates of suicide, self harm, anxiety and depression are up among adolescents. Speaker 0: And the record will show, Neil, that we didn't recommend shutting everything down. First of all, I didn't recommend locking anything down. I recommended to the president that we shut the country down. And that was very difficult decision because I knew it would have serious economic consequence, which it did. Yeah. Because if you look at the people that are politicizing me, there's somebody that all the way over on one level. But there are a lot of other people who look upon me the way they should as a nonpolitical person that I am. They're not doing it because they say they don't wanna do it. They're Republicans. They don't like to be told what to do. Right. And we gotta break that. But now is the time to do what you're told. Where did this virus come from, do you think, today? Did it come from a lab? Was it man made? When you have the animal human interface and you have animals that come out of the wild that are sold at these open, what they call them, wet market. Speaker 2: Place of origin was not within the market itself. No. I don't think you could say that. Speaker 5: There's a report today that another intelligence arm of the US government, this is inside our energy department, has joined the FBI in concluding that COVID began with a lab leak in China. Speaker 0: That the NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain of function research in the Wuhan Institute. Speaker 6: We now know that a bat coronavirus was enhanced in the lab. The National Institutes of Health acknowledged that it funded research of a virus that was studied at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The experiment unexpectedly, we're told, made a bat coronavirus more contagious than the original naturally occurring one. Speaker 1: Take an animal virus you increase the transibility to humans. Right. You're saying that's not gain of function? Yeah. Speaker 0: That is correct. And and senator Paul, you do not know what you are talking about, quite frankly. And I wanna say that officially. You do not know what you are talking about. Speaker 1: They took animal viruses that only occur in animals and they increased their transmissibility to humans. How you can say that is not gain of function? Speaker 0: It is not. What we're talking about now is the gain of function research in studies that increase predominantly the transmissibility as well as pathogenesis and alteration of host range of the virus. But he's lying here, senator. It is you. I'd have to laugh at that. I should be prosecuted.
Saved - November 8, 2025 at 10:55 PM

@idropFbombs - 𝒦𝑒𝓁𝓁𝓎࿎☽

He's 100% right. The government isn't going to open back up. It's time to wake up and realize wtf is happening. https://t.co/k8y7UfYcrr

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that the government will not reopen and that employees are being laid off during this crisis, claiming “It’s over with. They not opening the government back up.” They describe this as the plan all along and urge listeners to make sense of it, noting visible examples such as “thousands of people at the airport” in Houston with “no employees there,” and stating that TSA didn’t show up because “the government paid them.” The speaker declares, “There is no government. That’s the big secret,” and calls it the overarching conclusion of the situation. They allege a continuous test and manipulation, saying, “They running a psyops on us every week to see if we’re go for what they putting down,” and claim that people are still moving forward, “going to work,” still paying taxes, and continuing daily life despite the supposed shutdown. The speaker contrasts this with the claim that billionaires could have already provided funding—“They could have been kicked the money in for snaps for snap”—implying wealthier individuals have not redirected resources as a solution. The speaker proclaims that “It’s over with,” and asserts that the current mode of living has ended, describing this moment as the time for collective action and unity. They emphasize inclusivity beyond race or color, stating, “It don’t matter the color. It don’t matter the race. It none of that matters right now.” They conclude with a call to engagement, urging listeners to get in the comments and share their thoughts, reinforcing the message that the government’s status and the societal order are defined by this crisis as they see it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me let y'all know something, man. They not opening the government back up. To all of them employees, they're being laid off during this crisis. It's over with. They not opening the government back up. This has been the plan the whole time, y'all. Make it make sense. I'm pretty sure by now y'all done seen them people in Houston at the airport, thousands of people at the airport, no employees there. TSA didn't show up because, you know, the government paid them. Look. It it it's over with. There is no government. That's the big secret. Y'all haven't caught on yet. Listen, man. They running a on us every week to see if we're gonna go forward. They running a psyops on us every week to see if we're go for what they putting down, y'all. Make it make sense. And guess and guess what? People are going forward. They're still going to work. They're still paying taxes. Make it make sense. These billionaires could have been kicked the money in for snaps for snap. They could have been kicked down the money for snap, y'all. Make it make sense. Yeah. It's over with. The way we was living, it's over with. Y'all don't understand that this is the time that we need to come together. It don't matter the color. It don't matter the race. It none of that matters right now. It's over with. The government over with. Get in the comments and let me know what you
View Full Interactive Feed