reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
Since Hillary didn’t want to prove that Trump was right to not say he wouldn’t oppose the results, they had to come up with a plan b to request recounts. Enter Jill Stein, the Green Party candidate. https://t.co/eWnu4AlP2I
Video Transcript AI Summary
We tried to convince the Clinton team to do recounts, but it didn't work. Then, David Jefferson came up with a new idea. He realized that in many states, any candidate can request a recount. We found Jill Stein, the Green Party candidate, who agreed to help. Jill has a history of supporting election integrity and had about 1% of the vote. Her willingness to assist was a crucial moment for our efforts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We had a number of conversations trying to convince the Clinton people to move ahead with recounts, but it didn't seem like we were ever going to get there. But then we had a new idea, this time from David Jefferson, another election integrity advocate. His idea was his wonderful insight was that actually in many states, any candidate can request a recount. And although you might think we're a 2 party system in the US, there are third parties. In fact, we identified 1 third party, Jill Stein, the Green Party candidate, and Jill, we had a conversation with her culminating in a talk on the 22nd where She unbelievably was willing to help.
Jill has a long history of, being a champion of election integrity. She was on the ballot in most states. She ended up winning about 1% of the vote, not really all that much, but still enough, and most importantly, she was willing to help. This was an absolutely pivotal moment for the entire effort.
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
Jill Stein raised over $5 million dollars for the recount that Hillary’s team wanted. Seems like a campaign violation. Also, it’s absolutely incredible how many people care passionately about the integrity of our elections. That’s exactly what we election deniers say. https://t.co/P6666N8IpF
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses the importance of the recounts in the election and the evidence they provide. They mention that a crowdfunding campaign led by Jill Stein and the Green Party raised over $5,000,000 in just two days for the recounts. This amount exceeded the money raised for Stein's entire presidential campaign and involved 160,000 individual donors. The speaker emphasizes the significant number of people who are passionate about the integrity of elections. The video concludes by stating that now that they have the funds and a candidate, they are ready to proceed with the recounts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fortunately, this narrative of is there some kind of secret evidence or not has been very difficult to get around, but I think we're doing our best. And in this talk, we'll show you why the recounts were essential and what evidence the recounts are able to provide vis a vis the election result. So what happened next? On 23rd, the day before Thanksgiving, the same day my Medium post went live, Jill Stein announced that she was going to lead an effort to recount 3 critical states. In just 2 days, A crowdfunding campaign that Jill and the Green Party led raised more than $5,000,000 for the recounts.
That's more money than she raised for her entire presidential campaign. A 160,000 individual donors. It's absolutely incredible how many people care passionately about the integrity of our elections. The next question, now we have the money. We have a candidate.
We're to recount
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
1. Election security experts told Hillary she lost. 2. Obama is an election denier who ordered a congressional investigation of 2016. 3. National security told Hillary the election was hacked. The same people who yelled the most secure election in history in 2020. https://t.co/OpdbRJGPql
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states that the recounts support the correct election outcome, providing assurance that Donald Trump won without doubt. While there is no strong evidence of fraud or cyberattacks, the incomplete counts make verification imperfect. President Obama ordered an investigation into hacking before leaving office, with intelligence agencies agreeing that hacking likely influenced the outcome. Although the speaker can sleep at night, they cannot completely rule out fraud. Another speaker mentions that the recounts further confirm that the election was not hacked, increasing confidence in the election. However, they also discovered that hacking a US presidential election would be even easier than initially believed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The recounts support that the, election outcome was correct. That that, you know, we we can I I can sleep at night knowing that Donald Trump won the election and having no doubt? There is not strong evidence that there wasn't fraud or that there wasn't a cyberattack, though, counts were incomplete because there's sort of an imperfect way to do this, you know, to verify. So, Yeah. Like we said, cyberattacks already happened before.
We did get a a, congressional investigation out of this. President Obama has ordered an investigation before he leaves Office. And, you know, we got intelligence agencies to agree that, you know, there was hacking that did happen that probably influenced the outcome. But overall, I we can sleep at night, but we can't completely rule out fraud.
Speaker 1: So the recounts didn't complete. What I thought at the beginning, as I said in my medium piece, was that, well, the election probably wasn't hacked. What do we learn from the recounts? Well, we learned that It even more probably wasn't hacked. We get additional basis for confidence in the election.
But at the same time, along the way, we found that hacking an election in the US for president Would be well even easier than I thought when I began this process.
@tomselliott - Tom Elliott
.@HillaryClinton: Republicans defending Trump on classified docs "beyond anything that I ever thought possible in this country" [via @PodSaveAmerica]
Video Transcript AI Summary
Republicans claim that I got off easy and that Jim Comey let me off. It's absurd how that's their only response. They refuse to read the indictment or engage with the facts. This is about me, not anyone else. It's disturbing to see them defend this man. They had the opportunity to acknowledge his actions and move on, but they're still defending him. I find it hard to understand their psychology.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Republicans claim that you got off you did the same thing and got off scot free. Why did your friend, Jim Comey, let you off so easy?
Speaker 1: That that's a really good question. I can't figure that one out. You know, I do think it's it's, Odd, let's just say, to the point of being absurd, how that is their only response. You know, they refuse to read the indictment. They refuse to engage With the facts.
There's nothing new about that. And what they refuse to admit is, you know, this is on a track about him, Not about anybody else. No matter how much, they try to confuse people and how much they try to, you know, raise extraneous issues. And it's going to be fascinating, I guess, in a bizarre and sad way to watch them spin themselves up. If you watched any of the news programs this weekend.
I mean, their efforts to defend this man are truly beyond anything that I ever thought possible In our country, I mean, it is so profoundly disturbing how this could have been the break. This could have been the opportunity to say, you know, thank you so much for everything you've done for us. We really appreciate it, you know. But this is kind of, serious. And so we're not going to, you know, continue to defend you.
But no, they're all in again. That's what the psychology of this is so hard for me to fully grasp.
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
HILLARY CLINTON: “Well, Hitler was duly elected…Trump is telling us what he intends to do.” https://t.co/TxtzBRzy5y
Video Transcript AI Summary
Legitimately elected leaders have been known to undermine democracy by suppressing opposition and the free press. Historical examples, like Hitler's election, demonstrate how leaders with dictatorial tendencies gradually erode democratic institutions. What sets Trump apart is his open declaration of his intentions. He openly communicates his desire to silence dissent and imprison his opponents. This transparency is concerning, as it reveals a willingness to dismantle democratic norms.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: People would get legitimately elected Mhmm. And then they would try to do away with elections and do away with opposition and do away with a free press. And you could see it in countries where, well, Hitler was duly elected. That's right. Right?
And so all of a sudden, somebody with Those tendencies, those dictatorial, authoritarian tendencies would be like, Oh, okay, we're gonna shut this down, we're gonna throw these People in jail, and and they didn't usually telegraph that. Trump is telling us what he intends to do.
@TheGeneral_0 - General™️👀🇺🇸🦅
Hillary says that they need to eliminate 1/2 of the people that supports Trump.https://t.co/FXx1CoaXJp
Video Transcript AI Summary
Some people still support them and plan to vote for them. We need to reduce their numbers and focus on those who have doubts. Some are questioning how long they will continue to claim the election is rigged and pointing out the issues they face in the court system.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look, there are people who still, you know, support them. They say they're gonna vote for them. We just have to limit the number of those people and reach out to those who are having second thoughts who say, Well, you know, I thought he would have done better, or How much longer is he gonna do this rigged election thing, or Look at And all the problems he's got in the court system.
@JT4DT24 - 🗽Jordyn Trump🗽
In her own damn words!! What are the chances that Hillary forgot that she ever gave this interview?? https://t.co/G54xvXgcq0
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker acknowledges that the Israeli government and the US are part of the problem. They mention that in 2000, the Israeli government offered a Palestinian state, but it was turned down by Arafat and the PLO. There were also unsuccessful attempts to bring Palestinians and Israelis together during the speaker's time as Secretary of State. The speaker highlights that Israel left Gaza in 2005, but Hamas destroyed the infrastructure left behind and caused harm to Palestinians. They believe it is important to dislodge Hamas and work towards a two-state solution.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Agrees with him. Do you agree that the Israeli government, as well as the US, are part of the problem as well?
Speaker 1: Well, I think that the problem predates October 7th. And I think that's what President Obama was talking about because let's remember, this is a very long and complicated history. My husband, with the Israeli government at the time, in 2000, offered a Palestinian state to the Palestinians, at that time, run by Arafat. And the PLO. And the PLO, the Palestinian Liberation Organization, which, by the way, Took out of its charter violence against Israel.
So you gotta separate the Palestinians who believe that there is Some future of peace with Hamas, which believes it has to destroy Israel. Those are 2 different organizations, and they have to be viewed in that way. Arafat turned that down. There would have been a Palestinian state now for 23 years if he had not walked away from it. There was another attempt when I was Secretary of State to try to, you know, bring the Palestinians and the Israelis together.
That didn't work out. Israel left Gaza in 2005, just and and forcibly ejected 50,000 Israelis who were living in Gaza. They left all of their infrastructure. They had a big infrastructure through greenhouses where they were supplying fruits, vegetables, flowers, etcetera. And, you know, the Palestinians deserved to have A productive, successful economy in Gaza.
Hamas came in and basically destroyed all of that and Killed a lot of other Palestinians. So I think when President Obama says that, it requires us to look at the history. And, of course, History holds all of us accountable. And that is a fair statement. But today, we have to look at where we are.
And I believe It's imperative, since we've had numerous ceasefires with Hamas, all of which they have violated, to try finally to dislodge Hamas and allow the Palestinians to have other leadership that will actually once again work for a two state solution, which it should be The outcome that we all hold and pray for.
@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker
When will Hillary Clinton be charged with "election interference"? https://t.co/lKS6ndsTIw
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Clinton plan intelligence referred to information received around the same time as the Australian intelligence. It suggested that one of Mrs. Clinton's foreign policy advisers had a plan to link Donald Trump to the Russians. On August 3, 2016, Director Brennan briefed President Obama, Vice President Biden, Director of National Intelligence, the FBI, and the Attorney General about this intelligence. Director Comey was present during the briefing. However, this information was not provided to the agents working on the case or to the secret FISA Court.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jordan referenced the Clinton plan intelligence. Exactly what was the Clinton plan?
Speaker 1: Based on declassified documents in the in the public record, there was intelligence information that, was received, at virtually the same time that the information came from, from the Australians, I mean, within a day or two. That intelligence in included information that there was a, purported plan, designed by, one of missus Clinton's foreign policy advisers, to create a scandal tying Donald Trump, to the Russians. That's the essence of the intelligence as contained in the, declassified information.
Speaker 0: Did the president receive this intelligence?
Speaker 1: On August 3, 2016, then director Brennan had briefed the president, vice president, director of national intelligence, the FBI, the attorney general, and others.
Speaker 0: When you say the FBI, you mean mister Comey?
Speaker 1: They had on August 3rd, it was, conducted at the White House. It was director Comey himself.
Speaker 0: So mister Comey knew about this. President Obama knew about this. Vice President Biden knew about this. But, it wasn't provided to the agents, on the case or or provided to the secret FISA Court. Is that correct?
Speaker 1: That's correct.
@FiveTimesAugust - Five Times August
This is why they want to move on. Imagine allowing this and then having to explain yourself later. https://t.co/d0vtMFdPTu
reSee.it AI Summary
Hillary Clinton is being defended against claims of involvement in Bitcoin's demise. The author urges others to stop targeting her.
@Prolotario1 - Ariel
"To clear the floor I just want to say this in defense of Hillary Clinton. I don't want to come off like I am trying to exonerate or declare her innocence. But I just want to say that she had nothing to do with Bitcoin killing itself".
@realDerekUtley - Derek Utley
Hillary Clinton doesn’t want you to see this. Such an evil woman. https://t.co/FUc8GdiGaW
@4Mischief - • ᗰISᑕᕼIᗴᖴ ™ •
Hillary Clinton is deathly afraid that the Supreme Court could rule in favor of fair and safe elections. She wants to secure that her friends could use Dominion voting machines and “allegedly” steal another election in 2024 https://t.co/yteWFE8XMd
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Supreme Court, controlled by the right wing, might allow state legislatures to overturn presidential elections. This means the 2024 election could be decided by republican-controlled state legislatures, bypassing the popular vote and electoral college, potentially leading to election theft.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The right wing controlled Supreme Court may be poised to rule on giving state legislatures, yes you heard me that correctly, state legislatures the power to overturn presidential elections. Just think, if that happens, the 2024 presidential election could be decided not by the popular vote or even by the anachronistic electoral college, but by state legislatures many of them republican controlled to literally steal the next presidential election.
@sabback - Donna Marie
@alx Donna Brazile admitted to sending town hall debate topics to Hillary Clinton‘s presidential campaign while she worked for CNN, calling it "A mistake I will forever regret". https://t.co/QZEpEri9PF
Video Transcript AI Summary
Donna Brazil admitted to sending debate topics to Hillary Clinton's campaign while at CNN, leading to her departure. The delay in her admission is questioned, with concerns over ethical breaches and the impact on her credibility. The expectation of a Clinton victory may have influenced her actions. The incident highlights the need for transparency and ethical conduct in media and politics.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And then that she in fact did send town hall debate topics to Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign while she worked for CNN that happened a year ago. She's now saying she will, quote, forever regret it in a column in Time Magazine. It took more than a year for Donna Brazil to admit this. CNN ended up cutting ties with Donna Brazil while she was serving as the interim head of the DNC. Tammy, why a year later?
You know, it's
Speaker 1: fascinating because she's still kind of mincing the words here. She said sending debate topics over when the issue was sending direct questions over to her, the specificity of what was happening. Ahead.
Speaker 0: Before the debate. Before the debate. CNN.
Speaker 1: I mean, we knew what the
Speaker 0: topics were going
Speaker 1: to be. That each debate had a general, idea of, you know, of of an approach of what the topics would be. So the topics are not a big deal necessarily, but the nature of the questions and what was coming gonna come from the audience, etcetera. And I think that there's a point where she's now that there's new DNC heads, that she's finding that that kind of behavior, and with her candidate having lost, that it's catching up with her a little bit and she's trying to clean up a little bit.
Speaker 0: Eric, weigh in here. What are your thoughts?
Speaker 2: You know, I'd look, she's got an ethical obligation. I mean, she was certainly a contributor to CNN. There's supposed to be some kind of firewall. There wasn't. And then to wait a year.
And I think that, Tammy's right. I think that there's a gonna be a much higher bar. I think that there she's hurt herself for a long time to come over that. And certainly with the CNN and certainly with other networks, bad move, crossed the line.
Speaker 1: Especially with Hillary losing. The fact that they thought they could really do whatever they wanted because they expected Hillary to win. When she didn't, suddenly the real world
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 2: For all
Speaker 1: of us reenters this picture. No longer is it gonna be their bubble. Now they've got to face reality.
Speaker 0: Tammy, Eric, thank you so much for your time tonight. Have a good weekend. Okay? Thanks.
@MaxEvansUMP - ULTRA MAGA PARTY 👑
This is the greatest concern after yesterdays debate — bar none https://t.co/CUApToG0gM
Video Transcript AI Summary
This man has the power to decide what happens if North Korea fires a missile. Are you okay with that? Let's all go home and reflect on it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This man has the finger on the button. He is the only man that can decide what happens if North Korea launches a missile. Do you feel comfortable with that? We should all go home and just think of that.
@TRHLofficial - The Redheaded libertarian
In case you are wondering why Kamala Harris has so many demands for the ABC debate, this is what happened the last time she tried to be President. https://t.co/jOiOWnYOqb
Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator Harris has stated she is proud of her record as a prosecutor and will be a prosecutor president, but there are concerns about this record. As a prosecutor, she put over 1500 people in jail for marijuana violations, then laughed about it when asked if she ever smoked marijuana. She blocked evidence that would have freed an innocent man from death row until the courts forced her to do so. She kept people in prison beyond their sentences to use them as cheap labor for the state of California. She also fought to keep the tax bail system in place, which impacts poor people in a negative way.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Senator Harris says she's proud of her record as a prosecutor and that she'll be a prosecutor president, but I'm deeply concerned about this record. There are too many examples to cite, but she put over 1500 people in jail for marijuana violations and then laughed about it when she was asked if she ever smoked marijuana. She blocked evidence she blocked evidence that would have freed an innocent man from death row until the courts forced her to do so. She kept people in prison beyond their sentences to use them as chief labor for the state of California, and she fought to keep tax bail system in place that impacts poor people in the worst kind of way. Thank you, congresswoman.
@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”
She DID say this Out Loud ‼️ https://t.co/gRPrvqmm2K
Video Transcript AI Summary
The WHO is developing a pandemic treaty and amendments to international health regulations that will remove human rights protections and enforce surveillance and censorship. The goal is to develop vaccines in 100 days.
The amendments would bind states to enforceable edicts, provide a liability shield, remove intellectual property rights, move supplies between countries, and enforce digital passports. The WHO director general can declare a pandemic with no standards, and countries must obey. The WHO will dictate which drugs can be used.
One Health is a concept to enable the WHO to take over jurisdiction, suggesting humans are no longer of greater value than animals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're undergoing a soft coup, and the idea is to create a whole new set of laws and ignore the existing human rights laws and other laws under the pretext of pandemic preparedness and the biosecurity agenda. The WHO is developing through all its nations, but with the WHO director in the United States in charge, a pandemic treaty and amendments to the existing international health regulations that will remove the human rights protections currently, embedded in the IHRs, will enforce surveillance, censorship, if they can make this work to vaccines developed in a 100 days, which the organization CEPI is planning to do. And one of the people who founded CEPI was Jeremy Farrar, who is now the chief scientist at the WHO to bring this forward. Other things that the amendments do is to bind the states so they have no longer recommendations, but enforceable edicts. Provide a liability shield, get rid of intellectual property rights, move supplies from one country to another, enforce digital passports, and the director general of who can demand that a pandemic or a potential pandemic exists.
He can just declare it with no standards, and then countries around the world will have to obey. Also, the WHO will tell you what drugs you can and can't use in your nation once a pandemic is declared. Obviously, the budget will increase. One Health is another part of this. One Health is a concept that was created to enable the WHO with these documents to take over jurisdiction Also, embedded in this concept is a peculiar notion that humans are no longer of greater value than animals.
@aprofitableday - Tom Brooks 🙏❤️🌝🌞⭐️" Persevere - Everyday"
Kamala's Concession Speech... It was decent - she made some good points. We all wish her well in her future...... https://t.co/kpOKMHR2Xo
Video Transcript AI Summary
Good afternoon, everyone. My heart is full of gratitude for your trust and love for our country. Although the election outcome is not what we wanted, we must accept it and engage in a peaceful transfer of power. While I concede this election, I do not concede the fight for freedom, opportunity, and dignity for all. We will continue to advocate for our democracy, justice, and fundamental rights, both in public and in our daily lives. To the young people watching, it’s okay to feel disappointed, but don’t give up. You have the power to make a difference. Let’s roll up our sleeves, organize, and stay engaged for justice and a better future. Let the courage of those who fought for justice inspire us. Together, we can shine brightly, even in dark times. Thank you, and may God bless the United States of America.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good afternoon. Good afternoon. Good. Good afternoon, everyone. Good afternoon.
Good afternoon. Good afternoon. Thank you all. Thank you. Thank you.
Speaker 1: Thank you.
Speaker 0: Thank you. So let me say and I love you back.
Speaker 1: And I love you back. So let me say,
Speaker 0: my heart is full today. My heart is full today, full of gratitude for the trust you have placed in me, full of love for our country and full of resolve. The outcome of this election is not what we wanted, not what we fought for, not what we voted for. But hear me when I say hear me when I say the light of America's promise will always burn bright as long as we never give up and as long as we keep fighting. To my beloved DOUG and our family, I love you so very much.
To president Biden and doctor Biden, thank you for your faith and support. To governor Walz and the Walz family, I know your service to our nation will continue. And to my extraordinary team, to the volunteers who gave so much of themselves, to the poll workers and the local election officials, I thank you. I thank you all. Look.
I am so proud of the race we ran and the way we ran it and the way we ran it over the 107 days of this campaign, we have been intentional about building community and building coalitions, bringing people together from every walk of life and background united by love of country with enthusiasm and joy in our fight for America's future. And we did it with the knowledge that we all have so much more in common than what separates us. Now I know folks are feeling and experiencing a range of emotions right now. I get it, but we must accept the results of this election. Earlier today, I spoke with president-elect Trump and congratulated him on his victory.
I also told him that we will help him and his team with their transition and that we will engage in a peaceful transfer of power. A fundamental principle of American democracy is that when we lose an election, we accept the results. That principle, as much as any other, distinguishes democracy from monarchy or tyranny, and anyone who seeks the public trust must honor it. At the same time, in our nation, we owe loyalty not to a president or a party, but to the constitution of the United States and loyalty to our conscience and to our god. My allegiance to all 3 is why I am here to say, while I concede this election, I do not concede the fight that fueled this campaign.
The fight the fight for freedom, for opportunity, for fairness, and the dignity of all people, a fight for the ideals at the heart of our nation. The ideals that reflect America at our best. That is a fight I will never give up. I will never give up the fight for a future where Americans can pursue their dreams, ambitions, and aspirations, where the women of America have the freedom to make decisions about their own body and not have their government telling them what to do. We will never give up the fight to protect our schools and our streets from gun violence.
And America, we will never give up the fight for our democracy, for the rule of law, for equal justice, and for the sacred idea that every one of us, no matter who we are or where we start out, has certain fundamental rights and freedoms that must be respected and upheld. And we will continue to wage this fight in the voting booth, in the courts, and in the public square. And we will also wage it in quieter ways in how we live our lives by treating one another with kindness and respect, by looking in the face of a stranger and seeing a neighbor, by always using our strength to lift people up, to fight for the dignity that all people deserve. The fight for our freedom will take hard work, but like I always say, we like hard work. Hard work is good work.
Hard work can be joyful work, and the fight for our country is always worth it. It is always worth it. To the young people who are watching, it is I love you. To the young people who are watching, it is okay to to feel sad and disappointed, but please know it's gonna be okay. On the campaign, I would often say, when we fight, we win.
But here's the thing here's the thing. Sometimes the fight takes a while. That doesn't mean we won't win. That doesn't mean we won't win. The important thing is don't ever give up.
Don't ever give up. Don't ever stop trying to make the world a better place. You have power. You have power. And don't you ever listen when anyone tells you something is impossible because it has never been done before.
You have the capacity to do extraordinary good in the world. And so to everyone who is watching, do not despair. This is not a time to throw up our hands. This is the time to roll up our sleeves. This is a time to organize, to mobilize, and to stay engaged for the sake of freedom and justice and the future that we all know we can build together.
Look. Many of you know I started out as a prosecutor, and throughout my career, I saw people at some of the worst times in their lives, people who had suffered great harm and great pain, and yet found within themselves the strength and the courage and the resolve to take the stand, to take a stand, to fight for justice, to fight for themselves, to fight for others. So let their courage be our inspiration. Let their determination be our charge. And I'll close with this.
There's an adage an historian once called a law of history, true of every society across the ages. The adage is only when it is dark enough can you see the stars. I know many people feel like we are entering a dark time, But for the benefit of us all, I hope that is not the case. But here's the thing. America, if it is, let us fill the sky with the light of a brilliant, brilliant,000,000,000 of stars.
The light the light of optimism, of faith, of truth, and service. Yeah. Ain't you? And may that work guide us even in the face of setbacks toward the extraordinary promise of the United States of America. I thank you all.
May god bless you, and may god bless
Speaker 1: the United States of America. I thank you all.
Speaker 0: Introduce
@RWTNews - 🇺🇸🇺🇸Red White and True News🇺🇸🇺🇸
Kamala's entire "concession" speech where she called for supporters to Mobilize and fight. She just green lit the riots. https://t.co/EDBq87UZFC
Video Transcript AI Summary
Good afternoon, everyone. My heart is full of gratitude for your trust and love for our country. While the election outcome is not what we wanted, we must accept it and support a peaceful transition. I concede this election but not the fight for freedom, opportunity, and dignity for all. We will continue to advocate for our democracy, equal justice, and the rights of every individual. To the young people watching, it’s okay to feel sad, but don’t give up. You have the power to make a difference. Let us organize and mobilize for justice and a better future. Remember, even in dark times, we can shine bright with hope and determination. Thank you all, and may God bless the United States of America.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good afternoon. Good afternoon. Good afternoon, everyone. Good afternoon. Good afternoon.
Speaker 1: So let me say and I love you back. And I love you back. So let me say my heart is full today. My heart is full today, full of gratitude for the trust you have placed in me, full of love for our country, and full of resolve. The outcome of this election is not what we wanted, not what we fought for, not what we voted for.
But hear me when I say hear me when I say the light of America's promise will always burn bright as long as we never give up and as long as we keep fighting. To my beloved Doug and our family, I love you so very much. To president Biden and doctor Biden, thank you for your faith and support. To governor Walls and the Walls family, I know your service to our nation will continue. And to my extraordinary team, to the volunteers who gave so much of themselves, to the poll workers and the local election officials, I thank you.
I thank you all. Look. I am so proud of the race we ran and the way we ran it and the way we ran it over the 107 days of this campaign, we have been intentional about building community and building coalitions, bringing people together from every walk of life and background, united by love of country with enthusiasm and joy in our fight for America's future. And we did it with the knowledge that we all have so much more in common than what separates us. Yeah.
Now I know folks are feeling and experiencing a range of emotions right now. I get it. But we must accept the results of this election. Earlier today, I spoke with president-elect Trump and congratulated him on his victory. I also told him that we will help him and his team with their transition, and that we will engage in a peaceful transfer of power.
A fundamental principle of American democracy is that when we lose an election, we accept the results. That principle, as much as any other, distinguishes democracy from monarchy or tyranny. Yes. And anyone who seeks the public trust must honor it. At the same time, in our nation, we owe loyalty not to a president or a party, but to the constitution of the United States, and loyalty to our conscience and to our God.
My allegiance to all 3 is why I am here to say, while I concede this election, I do not concede the fight that fueled this campaign. The fight the fight for freedom, for opportunity, for fairness, and the dignity of all people. A fight for the ideals at the heart of our nation. The ideals that reflect America at our best. That is a fight I will never give up.
I will never give up the fight for a future where Americans can pursue their dreams, ambitions, and aspirations, where the women of America have the freedom to make decisions about their own body and not have their government telling them what to do. We will never give up the fight to protect our schools and our streets from gun violence. And America, we will never give up the fight for our democracy, for the rule of law, for equal justice, and for the sacred idea that every one of us, no matter who we are or where we start out, has certain fundamental rights and freedoms that must be respected and upheld. And we will continue to wage this fight in the voting booth, in the courts, and in the public square. Yeah.
And we will also wage it in quieter ways in how we live our lives by treating one another with kindness and respect, by looking in the face of a stranger and seeing a neighbor, by always using our strength to lift people up, to fight for the dignity that all people deserve. The fight for our freedom will take hard work, But like I always say, we like hard work. Hard work is good work. Hard work can be joyful work. And the fight for our country is always worth it.
It is always worth it. To the young people who are watching,
Speaker 0: it is
Speaker 1: I love you. To the young people who are watching, it is okay to feel sad and disappointed. But please know it's gonna be okay. On the campaign, I would often say, when we fight, we win. But here's the thing.
Here's the thing. Sometimes, the fight takes a while. That doesn't mean we won't win. That doesn't mean we won't win. The important thing is don't ever give up.
Don't ever give up. Don't ever stop trying to make the world a better place. You have power. You have power. And don't you ever listen when anyone tells you something is impossible because it has never been done before.
You have the capacity to do extraordinary good in the world. And so to everyone who is watching, do not despair. This is not a time to throw up our hands. This is a time to roll up our sleeves. This is a time to organize, to mobilize, and to stay engaged for the sake of freedom and justice and the future that we all know we can build together.
Look. Many of you know I started out as a prosecutor, and throughout my career, I saw people at some of the worst times in their lives. People who had suffered great harm and great pain. And yet found within themselves the strength and the courage and the resolve to take the stand, to take a stand, to fight for justice, to fight for themselves, to fight for others. So let their courage be our inspiration.
Let their determination be our charge. And I'll close with this. There's an adage an historian once called a law of history. True of every society across the ages. The adage is only when it is dark enough can you see the stars.
I know many people feel like we are entering a dark time. But for the benefit of us all, I hope that is not the case. But here's the thing. America, if it is, let us fill the sky with the light of a brilliant, brilliant,000,000,000 of stars. The light the light of optimism, of faith, of truth, and service.
And may that work guide us even in the face of setbacks toward the extraordinary promise of the United States of America. I thank you all. May god bless you, and may god bless the United States of America. I thank you all.
Speaker 2: Vice President Kamala Harris in a concession speech in which she said the light of America's promise will always burn bright as long as we keep fighting.
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
Hillary Clinton says that the Democrats lose TOTAL control if they stop censoring social media. 👀https://t.co/9g9kwFbZT1
Video Transcript AI Summary
If platforms like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, or TikTok fail to moderate and monitor content, we risk losing control. This lack of oversight leads to not only social and psychological issues but also real harm.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And if the platforms, whether it's Facebook or TwitterX or, Instagram or TikTok, whatever they are, if they don't moderate, and monitor the content, we lose total control. And it's not just the social and psychological effects. It's real harm.
@ClownWorld_ - Clown World ™ 🤡
“Harris could have won if we could regulate social media.” https://t.co/sQkwb2Mtg3
Video Transcript AI Summary
Regulating social media is essential, as Congress has struggled to address the issues posed by rogue corporations. There is a need for better oversight and action from both Congress and the administration to tackle these challenges effectively.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, it would help if we could regulate social media because one of the biggest defenders is DC and Congress have not been able to do one thing in regard to the rogue corporations that are being made. Better with with also, though, in the in the administration. I want I
@joeroganhq - Joe Rogan Podcast News
Hillary Clinton: "If social media doesn’t moderate content, then we lose total control." https://t.co/s586f3qsrk
Video Transcript AI Summary
If social media platforms do not moderate and monitor content, we lose total control. This loss of control results in real harm, beyond just social and psychological effects.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If the platforms whether it's Facebook or Twitter X or Instagram or TikTok whatever they are, if they don't moderate and monitor the content, we lose total control, and it's not just the social and psychological effects, it's real harm.
@BuzzPatterson - Buzz Patterson
She was in on it too. And she’s being awfully quiet. Make my dreams come true @realDonaldTrump! @HillaryClinton
@redpilldispensr - Red Pill Dispenser
Hillary Clinton REALLY hopes you don't watch this video. https://t.co/v71iT7waOQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Kennedy junior. He was declared the front runner for the New York senate seat back in 1999.
Days later, his plane crashed into the Atlantic Ocean, and his rival, Hillary Clinton, was elected senator.
Mary Mahoney was a Clinton White House intern.
She knew enough of the inner workings of Bill's sexual advancements to be a star witness during the Clinton impeachment trials.
She was brutally executed at a Starbucks she was managing in 1997.
In 1993, White House counsel Vince Foster was found dead in Fort Marcy Park near DC.
He supposedly killed himself, and among a lengthy list of potential foul play, the bullet was never found.
Then there's James McDougall, a key witness for White House prosecutors.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Kennedy junior. He was declared the front runner for the New York senate seat back in 1999. Days later, his plane crashed into the Atlantic Ocean, and his rival, Hillary Clinton, was elected senator. Mary Mahoney was a Clinton White House intern. She knew enough of the inner workings of Bill's sexual advancements to be a star witness during the Clinton impeachment trials.
She was brutally executed at a Starbucks she was managing in 1997. In 1993, White House counsel Vince Foster was found dead in Fort Marcy Park near DC. He supposedly killed himself, and among a lengthy list of potential foul play, the bullet was never found. Then there's James McDougall, a key witness for White House prosecutors. He was serving his three year sentence for bank fraud at the Fort Worth Federal Medical Center in Texas.
And just before he was to give a testimony before the grand jury, McDougall suffered a heart attack in solitary confinement. In 2015, Walter Scheib, a White House chef hired under Bill Clinton, joined the list. His body was found at the bottom of a river, nearly two miles from the base of trail he was reportedly hiking. An autopsy determined that Shive's death was accidental drowning, but he might have known too much. 27 year old Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich was shot and killed in DC this year.
There is speculation that he was the source of the controversial leaked emails allegedly sent by DNC staffers and that he may have been murdered in retaliation. Then Sean Lucas, the lead attorney in a fraud case against the DNC, was found lying on the bathroom floor by his girlfriend when she returned home on August 2. His death was reported classified, pending the results of an
@0HOUR1__ - 0HOUR
She's going to get people killed they don't give a fuck. https://t.co/sdmF1mXqKj
Video Transcript AI Summary
We might call this getting strike ready. I think of it as getting us strike ready or street ready. And part of that is understanding our own strength. And as we develop that strength, being able to assess our risk tolerance. Because we know that risk tolerance increases as the severity of the situation increases and as our own understanding of what's happening increases.
So overall, the more we understand what's effective, what the risks are, and who's ready to participate, the more impact we can have.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We might call this getting strike ready. I think of it as getting us strike ready or street ready. And part of that is understanding our own strength. And as we develop that strength, being able to assess our risk tolerance. Because we know that risk tolerance increases as the severity of the situation increases and as our own understanding of what's happening increases.
So overall, the more we understand what's effective, what the risks are, and who's ready to participate, the more impact we can have.
@redpilldispensr - Red Pill Dispenser
Hillary Clinton strongly discourages you from watching this video. https://t.co/HEKC5magSR
Video Transcript AI Summary
Remember John F. Kennedy Jr. He was declared the front runner for the New York senate seat back in 1999. Days later, his plane crashed into the Atlantic Ocean, and his rival, Hillary Clinton, was elected senator. Mary Mahoney was a Clinton White House intern. She knew enough of the inner workings of Bill's sexual advancements to be a star witness during the Clinton impeachment trials. She was brutally executed at a Starbucks she was managing in 1997. In 1993, White House counsel Vince Foster was found dead in Fort Marcy Park near DC. He supposedly killed himself, and among a lengthy list of potential foul play, the bullet was never found. Then there's James McDougal, a key witness for White House prosecutors. He was serving his three year sentence for bank fraud at the Fort Worth Federal Medical Center in Texas. And just before he was to give a testimony before the grand jury, McDougall suffered a heart attack in solitary confinement. In 2015, Walter Scheib, a White House chef hired under Bill Clinton, joined the list. His body was found at the bottom of a river, nearly two miles from the base of the trail he was reportedly hiking. An autopsy determined that Shive's death was accidental drowning, but he might have known too much. 27 year old Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich was shot and killed in DC this year. There is speculation that he was the source of the controversial leaked emails allegedly sent by DNC staffers and that he may have been murdered in retaliation. Then Sean Lucas, the lead attorney in a fraud case against the DNC, was found lying on the bathroom floor by his girlfriend when she returned home on August 2. His death was reported classified, pending the results of an autopsy. To this day, questions
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Remember John f Kennedy junior? He was declared the front runner for the New York senate seat back in 1999. Days later, his plane crashed into the Atlantic Ocean, and his rival, Hillary Clinton, was elected senator. Mary Mahoney was a Clinton White House intern. She knew enough of the inner workings of Bill's sexual advancements to be a star witness during the Clinton impeachment trials.
She was brutally executed at a Starbucks she was managing in 1997. In 1993, White House counsel Vince Foster was found dead in Fort Marcy Park near DC. He supposedly killed himself, and among a lengthy list of potential foul play, the bullet was never found. Then there's James McDougal, a key witness for White House prosecutors. He was serving his three year sentence for bank fraud at the Fort Worth Federal Medical Center in Texas.
And just before he was to give a testimony before the grand jury, McDougall suffered a heart attack in solitary confinement. In 2015, Walter Scheib, a White House chef hired under Bill Clinton, joined the list. His body was found at the bottom of a river, nearly two miles from the base of the trail he was reportedly hiking. An autopsy determined that Shive's death was accidental drowning, but he might have known too much. 27 year old Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich was shot and killed in DC this year.
There is speculation that he was the source of the controversial leaked emails allegedly sent by DNC staffers and that he may have been murdered in retaliation. Then Sean Lucas, the lead attorney in a fraud case against the DNC, was found lying on the bathroom floor by his girlfriend when she returned home on August 2. His death was reported classified, pending the results of an autopsy. To this day, questions