reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️
Watch. The. Entire. Thing. Transitioning children is one of the most egregious crimes in American medical history.
Video Transcript AI Summary
An endocrinologist questions the use of powerful hormones and surgeries in gender affirmative therapy without concrete evidence of gender identity. They highlight the high rates of desistance in children with gender dysphoria and the lack of objective markers to determine if a child will persist in their gender identity. The Endocrine Society acknowledges the low quality of evidence and the difficulty in identifying which children require treatment. The American Academy of Pediatrics suggests asking the children themselves. The spread of the affirmative model of care has outpaced the evidence supporting it, as shown by systematic reviews indicating poor quality and uncertain benefits. A study on mastectomy in youth is criticized for drawing conclusions based on a small sample size and short follow-up period. The quality of research in this field is questioned.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A board certified endocrinologist practicing in private practice for the last 16 years. I've been studying, and publishing in this area for the last 5 years, including peer reviewed journals such as Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism and others. I also have a patient who is a detransitioner. I I think it's important to note that studies have shown that desistance or growing out of this condition of children by adulthood is very high, some 50% to 98%. I want to be sure before I give someone a very powerful hormone like insulin that they in fact have diabetes.
What about cancer? Before we give any powerful agents such as chemotherapeutics or surgeries, we certainly want to have physical evidence of this problem, such as biopsies or imaging. Now, the gender affirmative therapy treatment proposed by WPATH gives very powerful hormones and surgeries on what basis? Where can we find the gender identity to be certain that these children will not desist by adulthood? Can we use imaging of the brain or blood tests, genetic testing?
Are there other biomarkers to ensure that we are correct. There is no such thing.
Speaker 1: The Endocrine Society put out guidelines in 2017, And they were very careful in the guidelines, one, to point out that the evidence was of low and very low quality. And they also said in the guidelines That they have no idea how you identify which kids are trans and require this treatment. And then the American Academy of Pediatrics, the next year, just lept into that void and Oh. Oh, we'll tell you how you know which kids. You ask them.
Prior to 2018, I had maybe 1 translation, but then there was another one And another one and another one. It wasn't until later that I started asking questions like, wait. Every single kid I send to the gender clinic Gets put on puberty blockers across sex hormones. Just it was happening immediately.
Speaker 2: This affirmative model of care has spread wildly in the last 8 years. Now we have objective, unbiased, systematic reviews. These systematic reviews tell us the evidence for youth transition is poor quality and with very low certainty for benefit. In JAMA Pediatrics, there was a study reported from Northwestern University in Chicago. Patients ranged in age from 13 to 24 years.
The authors concluded that mastectomy was beneficial and should not be delayed in youth. What led them to that conclusion? The finding that 3 months after surgery, the 36 patients were happy with their flat chests. They lost 9% of their surgical cases to follow-up, 9% in 3 months. It is absurd, meaningless to draw any conclusions after 3 months.
This paper is indicative of the quality of research we have in this field, published in our most prestigious journals. We have a serious problem.
@realchrisrufo - Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️
A whistleblower from Texas Children's Hospital says that "gender-affirming" doctors prescribe puberty blockers to children after a single visit—and intimidate parents into compliance. This is a massive scandal in the heart of Texas. https://www.city-journal.org/article/texas-childrens-hospital-whistleblower-speaks-out
“They’re Wanting to Play God”
“Gender-affirming care” is “ruining” kids, the person says.
city-journal.org
@OliLondonTV - Oli London
Biden’s Assistant HHS Secretary Rachel Levine calls the Mutilation of children ‘necessary.’ “Gender affirming care is medically necessary, safe and effective for transgender and non-binary youth.” https://t.co/mYH4QJciSN
Video Transcript AI Summary
Gender affirmative care is deemed medically necessary, safe, and effective for transgender and non-binary individuals. Attacks on the LGBTQI+ community, particularly trans youth, are driven by an agenda unrelated to science and medicine. These politically and ideologically motivated assaults contradict the vast body of scientific evidence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Gender affirmative care is medically necessary, safe, and effective for transgender and non binary youth and adults. Those who attack our LGBTQI plus community are driven by an agenda that has nothing to do with science and medicine. These are politically and ideologically motivated attacks again on trans youth, and they are contrary to the overwhelming science and evidence.
@4th_WaveNow - 4thWaveNow
Evidently the interview w/ gender surgeon Blair Peters -- discussing the experimental nature of interventions on minors-- garnered too much attention. It's now "private". (Why do they always hide what they do after people notice?) Archived version here: https://web.archive.org/web/20230526232855/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhIycMvV8vk
@MailOnline - Daily Mail Online
Surgeon who performs sex-change surgery on trans CHILDREN admits they face lifetime of infertility, incontinence and sexual dissatisfaction https://trib.al/Hj8WFrX https://trib.al/Hj8WFrX
Portland surgeon reveals drawbacks of genital trans ops on kids
Dr Blair Peters, a self-described 'queer surgeon' with 'he/they' pronouns, pink hair and a 'passion' for genital surgeries, revealed that patients face lifelong post-op complications.
dailymail.co.uk
reSee.it AI Summary
A radiation therapist claims that gender-affirming care is necessary to prevent kids from harming themselves. However, this argument is criticized for promoting lifelong medical dependency and irreversible procedures. Despite acknowledging the controversy, the therapist continues to advocate for this approach. Support is sought to raise awareness about this issue.
@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸
This radiation therapist at Lurie Children’s Hospital in Chicago tells me that kids will kill themselves if we don’t turn them into lifelong medical patients and cut off their body parts. Amidst the verbal diarrhea, I’m told this is necessary for children to express their gender. Part 1
Video Transcript AI Summary
Beauty blockers have been used by doctors for kids experiencing precocious puberty. The conversation then shifts to transgender children, with one speaker arguing that gender affirming care is life-saving and reduces suicide rates. The other speaker questions the lack of studies on suicide rates among transgender children and argues against medical interventions like hormone therapy and surgeries. The conversation becomes heated, with one speaker claiming that transgender children don't exist and that they should be accepted as they are, while the other argues that they need medical interventions. The debate centers around the belief that transgender children are either born in the wrong body or that they should be accepted without medical interventions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So beauty block blockers are super safe and have been used by doctors for a very long time for kids who, like, have, like like, girls who get way early, like, 7 year olds who start to have their period there.
Speaker 1: It's Sure. Precocious puberty, totally different than giving it kids who are being lied to and told that they have a gender identity that's different than their sexuality.
Speaker 0: They're not being lied to. They just need to like, it's very traumatic for kids to have to go through a a different like, to go through puberty whenever
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: Yeah. It's it's super different for kids that have to go to go to school and, that's why it's like
Speaker 1: Do you think puberty is a medical conditioner company?
Speaker 0: No. I mean, it it I guess, technically, everything's a medical conditioner in it, you know, because
Speaker 1: And you're a nurse, or what do you do here?
Speaker 0: I'm not gonna talk to you about what I do here, but, I
Speaker 1: Radiation therapist. Got it.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, I guess I shouldn't have flipped it over. Yeah. Yeah. So I help treat cancer, and I treat a lot of kids.
And, yeah. I guess you're not really, like you're not here to, like, listen to, like, time.
Speaker 1: No. I'm here to ask conversations. I would actually like to ask you a few honest questions, if I may. I'd like to know what it is to be a transgender child. What does that mean?
Speaker 0: To be a transgender child is just to to be a transgender anybody. I don't I really don't wanna be in anything that you're putting together. I don't I don't trust that you're gonna have, like
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna edit anything. It's just gonna go straight up.
Speaker 0: Uh-huh.
Speaker 1: I've been doing this for almost 3 years. I've had probably 20,000 of these conversations. And I have yet to be able to get an answer to the question of what does it mean, for example, for a girl to be a boy? What does that mean?
Speaker 0: It's just it means that, like, whenever somebody is born, a doctor looks at their genitalia and then assigns them a gender, and gender is based is is a society based thing. And so, yeah, this person might have all of these art but wants to express themselves in a in a different way or or feels more feminine than, than masculine and wants to
Speaker 1: express themselves that way
Speaker 0: and use, trust themselves that way and use this, use this gender as society has, like, incorporated it to me. And so a transgender child is a child who already knows that the assignment that they've been given doesn't not just how they want to express themselves. Like, I'm not a transgender person, so I can really speak to that experience. But I'm married to a transgender person, and she just didn't have and she didn't have the vocabulary to describe what was wrong whenever she was younger, and it would have made a lot of a a big impact in her life. And the reason that she is alive today is because she's gotten gender for new care.
So it's it's life saving.
Speaker 1: Yeah. That's what I hear all the time. Yeah. There's no studies to show that suicide rates decrease
Speaker 0: there are.
Speaker 1: Sterilizing children. Can you show me some of these?
Speaker 0: Yeah. I could show you some of these. Yeah. There there are lots of studies that show that gender affirming care, reduces suicide.
Speaker 1: Yeah? Like what? Can you name 1?
Speaker 0: Could you name 1? I suppose that it's
Speaker 1: I I can't name 1 because they're authentic.
Speaker 0: No. There there are.
Speaker 1: The only studies we actually have into suicide are with the adult population. That's There have been no proper studies done with kids. And with the adult population, the most comprehensive study we have is done in Sweden, and it doesn't
Speaker 0: Oh, that one's been debunked.
Speaker 1: So Oh, has it? Yeah. How so? Because of fine. Do you even know what what I'm talking about?
Speaker 0: Yeah. I do because there's one study that people, like, you keep rolling around
Speaker 1: with nothing. What about the one that came out of Denmark about 2
Speaker 0: months confirmed your bias. I don't see, well, since you brought up the Sweden one, I don't trust that you have, like, a really good, like, I don't I don't trust that you're, like, actually looking for the facts because Okay.
Speaker 1: Well, why don't you send me the facts later when you get home? You can email me chrissilboretrichs.com, and you can send me the facts.
Speaker 0: The one from Sweden wasn't even, like, it it wasn't reporting what people were saying that it was reporting. It's just, like, there was not any, very there there wasn't any understanding of what the actual paper was about.
Speaker 1: So it hasn't been debunked, and it shows that, 10 years after sex reassignment surgery, Suicide rates were 19.1 times higher than their peers. Let me talk to you. After accounting for mental health comorbidities. If you ignore the mental health comorbidities, it's higher.
Speaker 0: Gonna talk over me if we're gonna have
Speaker 1: a conversation.
Speaker 0: Have conversation.
Speaker 1: Well, that means you speak and then I speak. Right? That's how these work.
Speaker 0: Well, you are interrupting. Oh, okay. But but you are right. It debunks was the wrong word to use. So, those studies were taken during a specific period of time, and they were retrospective.
Right. And so it wasn't, it was talking about, like, people as a whole and the, like, the population groups. And, I mean, I you can, like, put that something with the eye. That doesn't know what she's talking about. But,
Speaker 1: So, Rebecca, I'm still struggling to get an answer to the basic question. What does it mean for a girl to what? Why can't they just So
Speaker 0: you didn't understand what I'm saying?
Speaker 1: I really didn't. Why can't they just present themselves and dress themselves and express themselves however they want Without blocking their body's physical development going on off the sex hormones that have no place in their body and cutting off body parts. So most Why do we have to cut off body parts to allow a child to express himself?
Speaker 0: I mean, we are not cutting off body parts of children except, I mean There
Speaker 1: are thousands of girls, minors, receiving double mastectomy.
Speaker 0: There's also minors to get their parents' consent to receive, like, breast implants, and, like, that's not up for debate.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I don't think they should be doing that either.
Speaker 0: So, I mean but
Speaker 1: what I'm trying to do year old girls in California who've had their breasts cut off. Do you think that's okay?
Speaker 0: I I mean, I don't think that it's I don't think that that's, something that should be up to, our government. I think that that could be something that is between the doctors and the parents.
Speaker 1: So you think that a 12 year old girl
Speaker 0: I don't think that's happening very
Speaker 1: Shoot. It's not happening very much, but it's happening.
Speaker 0: I don't
Speaker 1: think named Layla Jane. She was 13 years old in grade 8 when they cut off her breast at Kaiser Permanente in Oakland, California. How long ago was that? Doing now. This was just the last few
Speaker 0: years. What's the last few years?
Speaker 1: I don't know exactly 2, 3 years ago. This is still happening. Reuters reported That's between 2019 and 2021. Now these are just kids that used insurance.
Speaker 0: What is that?
Speaker 1: And these are only kids that received
Speaker 0: 0%, they've, like,
Speaker 1: So you were just talking a minute ago about not cutting people off. Right?
Speaker 0: Yeah. But I'm trying to.
Speaker 1: Oh, okay. Okay. So there are thousands of girls receiving double mastectomy because they've been caught up in this phrase that teaches them that just because they don't conform to sexist, aggressive stereo texts, must be something wrong with them. What message do you think it sends to a child when we tell them they were born in the wrong body?
Speaker 0: I don't think no I don't think anybody is telling children
Speaker 1: Are you kidding me? Body in the
Speaker 0: you're telling children that they're born in the wrong body if you don't think that they could get the the gender affirming care that they an
Speaker 1: option Actually, what I'm saying when that happens is they're born in the exact right body, and there's no such thing as gender affirming care. If there was What it is is it's called child abuse.
Speaker 0: If there was
Speaker 1: not care. Care. For the first time in human history, we're cutting off the body parts of children and giving them pharmaceutical drugs.
Speaker 0: What do you think circumcision is?
Speaker 1: I don't agree with that either. Okay. But this is what trans activists like yourself always do is you go to these what about isms because you can't actually address the argument at hand. So if you could try to say, like, this, that'd be great.
Speaker 0: That I addressed it, but you didn't No.
Speaker 1: You still haven't told me what it means for a girl to be a boy.
Speaker 0: It means that because the way that you're phrasing the question is not very nice.
Speaker 1: These girls now believe that they're boys. They believe they're boys on the inside. So what does that mean?
Speaker 0: If you don't think that trans boys exist and can't have that conversation.
Speaker 1: They don't exist.
Speaker 0: So then there you go.
Speaker 1: There's no such thing as a transgender child.
Speaker 0: Yeah. They're not.
Speaker 1: They're called girls and boys. And message we should be sending them is that they're beautiful just as they are. Do you know But you wanna send them a message that there's something wrong with them No. I don't. And they need to become lifelong pharmaceutical patients and get body parts cut off in that.
Because you're pushing this lie that kids are gonna kill themselves because they're born in the wrong body.
@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸
The cognitive dissonance is strong with this one. Her argument is that kids will kill themselves if they don’t receive ‘gender affirming care’ — the leftist euphemism for mutilating and sterilizing kids while turning them into permanent medical patients. When summarizing her position for her with real language, she denies she’s saying that, because she realizes how terrible it sounds. But she’ll keep pushing it anyway. This is what cultists do. My apologies for the mind-numbing nature of this conversation.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers engage in a heated debate about transgender children and medical interventions. Speaker 1 argues that there is no such thing as a transgender child and that they should be encouraged to embrace their biological gender. Speaker 0 disagrees, stating that children should have the option to pursue medical interventions if they choose to do so. The conversation becomes increasingly confrontational, with Speaker 1 accusing Speaker 0 of promoting child abuse and Speaker 0 accusing Speaker 1 of spreading misinformation. The debate touches on topics such as puberty blockers, hormone therapy, and detransitioning. The conversation ends with both speakers expressing their frustration and disagreement.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Don't think that transport exists and we can't have that conversation.
Speaker 1: They don't exist.
Speaker 0: Oh, then there you go. There's no
Speaker 1: such thing as a transgender child.
Speaker 0: Yeah. They're not.
Speaker 1: They're called girls and boys. And the message we should be sending them is that they're beautiful just as they are. Do you know But you wanna send them a message that there's something wrong with them No.
Speaker 0: I don't.
Speaker 1: And they need to become lifelong pharmaceutical patients and get body parts cut off in order to find true happiness. That's not that. Because you're pushing this lie that kids are gonna kill themselves That's not that. Because they're born in the wrong body. Not that.
That's exactly what you're arguing.
Speaker 0: No. That's not that.
Speaker 1: Then why are you recommending we cut off the body parts of children?
Speaker 0: I'm not recommending that.
Speaker 1: So you agree that we shouldn't be cutting off the body parts of kids?
Speaker 0: No. I don't. I agree that it should be Something that is not it it right now, it's just a bunch of, like, beer moms in it. And there's there are a lot of, like
Speaker 1: statistical fact that thousands of girls are having their breast cut off. Don't And boys who are minors are also getting vaginoplasty. They celebrated 1 on national TV, the show I am Jazz. He was 17 years old when he had a vaginoplasty.
Speaker 0: And I I Well, go
Speaker 1: read this Reuters article. It shows that between 2019 and 2021, 776 kids who used insurance, Only those who received an official gender dysphoria diagnosis. So it doesn't include those who use private pay, and it doesn't include those who didn't receive those diagnosis, which they don't always get. It showed that between those years, there were 776 girls. If you include the private pay, it gets up into the 1,000, and this is still increasing year over year.
Speaker 0: I mean
Speaker 1: Never mind the tens of thousands who are going on hormones. So why do girls need testosterone to be their 2 selves?
Speaker 0: Why does it matter to you?
Speaker 1: It's not that child abuse. Because I'm a dad, and I see an epidemic of child abuse. I see a cult permeating all of society.
Speaker 0: It's not. It's not at all. I mean, it's not
Speaker 1: turning them into lifelong medical patients isn't child abuse? No. They're literally becoming lifelong pharmaceutical patients. You know that. Right?
Speaker 0: Who is it? Who like, who's not a
Speaker 1: I'm not a lifelong pharmaceutical based
Speaker 0: part of, like, the medical system. Me? You're just like
Speaker 1: I'm not on anything, are you? Okay. Maybe maybe that's why you have these opinions.
Speaker 0: No. That's not why I have opinions. I feel like you're just you're grabbing at everything, and you're not, like, focusing on one part. I see that I get that you're mad and that you care about kids, and I care about kids too. And that's why I them so
Speaker 1: much that you wanna turn them into lifelong pedicantation.
Speaker 0: I Nobody, except for anti trans, are forcing kids to be anything that they're not.
Speaker 1: So this isn't anti trans. This is pro child.
Speaker 0: This is anti My
Speaker 1: message is that children are beautiful just as they are. Your message is that there's something wrong with these kids No. And they need to go on pharmaceutical drug.
Speaker 0: They don't need to unless they don't wanna go through the Superdise that is that their body is going to produce. Do you know about carrying types?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I do. Okay. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Well, then you know that gender is not a binary.
Speaker 1: Yeah. That's got nothing to do
Speaker 0: with gender. Level.
Speaker 1: That's got nothing to do with gender. Know that. What you're doing now is you're bringing up this intersex argument, which we should appropriately call disorders of sexual development.
Speaker 0: It's not.
Speaker 1: And everyone with A disorder of sexual development in BP's different karyotypes and these different chromosomal structures, they're still all male or female. And you as a hospital employee should know that. You can Google it, find it out in second to the lot.
Speaker 0: No. I don't think that you have any kind of degree or any kind of No.
Speaker 1: No degree.
Speaker 0: Or any kind of edge well, not I
Speaker 1: just have a brain in my head. Yeah.
Speaker 0: So so do I. So do I. I can read too, and, you know, I it's really unfortunate. I probably shouldn't have stopped to talk to you
Speaker 1: Probably not.
Speaker 0: Because you're, you know, you're you're very, very misinformed. You're reading studies What
Speaker 1: have I been misinformed about so far?
Speaker 0: Great, but you you're not, you're not including all of The, you're not including actually what those studies are about and what those studies portray. And
Speaker 1: You know that historically kids with gender dysphoria, 80 to 90% as time grow out of it, and a majority grow up to be gay.
Speaker 0: I don't Have
Speaker 1: you read those studies?
Speaker 0: I don't trust you. I don't think that you'll be
Speaker 1: Well, they're all academic studies on my website. You can go
Speaker 0: You've already you've already presented studies in a way that is misleading and misinforming.
Speaker 1: Oh, so I'm giving you the exact
Speaker 0: No. Because you're you're you're giving me studies is introducing them. And I I'm not I honestly am not familiar with all of the studies that you've said. Okay. But I am familiar with a couple of them, and the and the 2 examples that you've given me that I do know a little bit about, are, Like, the conclusions that you've drawn for them are not the conclusions of the studies.
So they are definitely
Speaker 1: May I
Speaker 0: re may
Speaker 1: I reference 1 for a moment here?
Speaker 0: The science does not Support these arguments. Children are not being abused by doing what they need to do. These are these lockers are established as Very safe and have been used for a long time. And it's very traumatic for kids to go through a puberty that but not with the the gender hear that. They already know.
Speaker 1: So first of all, these drugs are being used off label. You know that. Yeah. These drugs have never been approved for this person.
Speaker 0: So,
Speaker 1: why have England, Sweden, Norway, Finland and Denmark You're you're who have just completed systematic reviews. Why are they undoing this?
Speaker 0: A lot of, you're you're you're using things incorrectly. You've been misinformed. Warm. You're misinterming your people.
Speaker 1: Have you read the systematic review that England just did?
Speaker 0: I I don't think I can talk to you anymore because you're Have
Speaker 1: you read the systematic review that England just did?
Speaker 0: And, It's very, very damaging for this message to be out there and for you to be, like, causing, like, a lot of harm because No. It starts with, like, oh, no. Worry about the kids. But it it's just like a slippery slope of bad project. Bad information.
Often, what what happens more than 90% of the time is that children can go on puberty blockers, and then, once they're 18 and update their own decisions and like that.
Speaker 1: They're going on cross sex hormones.
Speaker 0: For the best.
Speaker 1: They're going on prostate hormones as young teenagers.
Speaker 0: And then
Speaker 1: Do you know that this hospital received a grant to give prostate hormones to 8 year olds?
Speaker 0: And Are
Speaker 1: you familiar with that?
Speaker 0: If they
Speaker 1: The NIH gave a $5,700,000 grant to give testosterone to 8 year old girls.
Speaker 0: They're not trying to learn, and that's really upsetting. Is You're
Speaker 1: the one that doesn't wanna have a conversation here.
Speaker 0: Well, you're the
Speaker 1: one that talk about the most recent studies that were done before kids skipped. You can
Speaker 0: talk to them. Lot of very, like, hyperbolic Things.
Speaker 1: And you're telling me a lot
Speaker 0: and you're telling me
Speaker 1: that they're
Speaker 0: well, but you're you're you're bringing in studies, but you're only looking at that the bias pieces of it That's not the conclusion or You don't know
Speaker 1: what I've looked at.
Speaker 0: Drawing design studies, so you're you're ready
Speaker 1: to start using
Speaker 0: information Why don't
Speaker 1: we discuss most recent one?
Speaker 0: Going to because I don't because I don't trust you. I think that, like, the
Speaker 1: Well, why why don't we bring it up on PubMed right now? We can read it right on PubMed. How about we do that?
Speaker 0: Is that you brought up, do not say the things that you're saying that they do and, friends. So I
Speaker 1: haven't even been able to talk about them, so how do you know what they're saying?
Speaker 0: But,
Speaker 1: alright, Rebecca. It's been a pleasure.
Speaker 0: Really would I don't think that you're gonna change Your mind or that you're going
Speaker 1: through the truth or
Speaker 0: you're not gonna I don't think that you're gonna try to look into truth or anything, but I would really hope that you, to, like, look for the testimony from, like, real people and real children and, Really?
Speaker 1: That's literally all I've been doing for more than 3 years.
Speaker 0: Right. So I I
Speaker 1: What do you have to say to the detransitioners who are what do you say have to say to the detransitioners who have been armed for life, Have deep regrets and say they didn't receive any help, and they were just rushed into this a
Speaker 0: a super low percentage. But you don't care about them? I do care about them. Yeah.
Speaker 1: What do you care about
Speaker 0: I I care about everybody who gets the access to affirming care that needs.
Speaker 1: Okay. Well, that's exactly what happened to these kids. And now they're saying that I think did you do to me? You just Rush into this medical process.
Speaker 0: And, your, your message and misinformation is very useful.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Thanks. Have a good one.
@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸
I’ll be walking around Chicago today, and get back to Lurie Children’s Hospital. If you wish to support my efforts to raise awareness about this child abuse, I’m very grateful for your help. billboardchris.com/donate
reSee.it AI Summary
NBC reporter criticizes the idea of children deciding on future parenthood while still young. A doctor counters, highlighting the tragic reality of child suicide. However, it is argued that puberty itself is not a direct cause of suicide. Accusing doctors of exploiting suicide to promote child transition, calls for severe punishment arise.
@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸
NBC reporter: “To me it seems ridiculous to have a kid at age 12, 13, 14 deciding whether they want to have biological children when they’re 20, 30, or 40.” Doctor: “Well they make the decision to kill themselves at 12 and 13.” This doctor is a criminal. https://t.co/SFlOeCrTM9
Video Transcript AI Summary
It is seen as unreasonable for young teenagers to decide whether they want to have children in the future. However, it is argued that if they can make the decision to end their own lives at such a young age, then taking action to prevent harm is necessary.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To me, it seems ridiculous to have a kid at age 12, 13, 14 deciding whether they want to have biological children when they're 20, 30 or 40. I mean
Speaker 1: Well, they make the decision to kill themselves at 12 and 13. That's a pretty powerful decision. We take an oath. 1st, do no harm. If doing nothing is doing harm, you have to do something.
@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸
It is complete fabrication that children are killing themselves because they are going through puberty. We’ve existed on this planet for a long time. Puberty is not and never has been a cause of suicide. Weaponizing the threat of suicide to push child transition is criminal. These doctors deserve life in prison.
@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸
She wants this taken down. Says she’s being misrepresented and feels ‘unsafe.’ The only people unsafe at Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago are the kids in the gender clinic. Get her another million views.
@MarchandSurgery - Greg J. Marchand MD
Unfortunately it has been proven they are cutting the breasts off girls at least as young as 13 in the USA for "gender affirming" reasons. https://www.newsmax.com/health/health-news/gender-affirming-mastectomy-procedure/2022/09/30/id/1089881/
Study of Gender-Affirming Mastectomy Procedure Included Patients as Young as 13
However, when one takes the time to carefully read this study, there is one fact that jumps out to the discerning reader - the study discloses that of the patients that received surgery, the age range was 13 to 24. This means that in this group of 36 women it is very likely a majority of them were younger than 18, and at least one of them had to be 13 years old!
newsmax.com
@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸
This video exposes the madness and lies of trans health professionals. Johanna Olson-Kennedy, who runs the biggest gender clinic in the world at the Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, says an 18-month-old toddler knew they were transgender. https://t.co/GdUf0HpA8e
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the increasing number of transgender youth seeking medical care and undergoing treatments like puberty blockers and surgeries. It highlights the challenges and risks involved in these procedures, including postoperative depression and complications. The story follows Jazz, a transgender youth, and her journey through surgeries and the support of her family. The debate around the effectiveness and safety of these treatments is also touched upon, with differing opinions on the outcomes and long-term effects. Overall, the video sheds light on the complex and emotional process of transitioning for transgender individuals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The number of transgender people probably hasn't changed, but young people are finding that it's safer to be who they are.
Speaker 1: The youngest that I've ever heard somebody express their gender identity being different than their assigned gender is 18 months old.
Speaker 2: From the age of about 2, they they're brought in and and then some are encouraged to do a social transition.
Speaker 3: At just 11 years old, she is the brave and beautiful new face of a child born in the wrong body.
Speaker 2: The boy wants to play with dolls. Given, the media, instead of just saying, wow, okay, you're just playing around or it's not a big deal or maybe you're gay, they rushed them to the gender clinics.
Speaker 1: We have the largest trans youth clinic in the world.
Speaker 0: They are expressing their identities more openly and presenting for medical care.
Speaker 4: Puberty blockers at age 12, however, where you're given a chance to get that time that you need to see if it is a real phenomenon, yes, that makes a lot of sense.
Speaker 5: She's one of the first to have undergone complete tubular suppression.
Speaker 1: Being able to block that process with these medications is extremely beneficial.
Speaker 6: There are differences associated with puberty blockers, including less bone density. One study showed reduced spatial memory.
Speaker 7: I got my first blocker and testosterone shots at 13 years old.
Speaker 6: This does not alleviate symptoms of gender dysphoria. It does not improve psychological functioning in these children.
Speaker 7: The high suicide rates amongst, like, trans identified adolescents, and they basically said, would you rather have a dead daughter or a live son?
Speaker 8: Had you expressed any suicidal ideation to any of anyone?
Speaker 7: No. And it was at 15 that I went under the knife to get my mastectomy.
Speaker 2: The boys can have their genital surgeries from about 16, and there's some hint that it might even be 15.
Speaker 4: Hello. Knock, knock. Hello. Hello.
Speaker 2: Who made themselves be transgender or are transgender.
Speaker 4: Jazz has had a very difficult surgical course. She had a very incredible first surgery. It went seemingly very well, but there were problems.
Speaker 5: Why are you cutting there? Right here?
Speaker 4: Yeah. Why? Because it does it scar, Jess. I don't like it.
Speaker 5: Yeah. But there's scar everywhere. If you don't have to cut this, why would you cut this?
Speaker 4: This is what the WPATH Standards of Care are all about. They're consensus and science based guidelines. It turned out tougher than any of us imagined.
Speaker 5: Lack of growth of the skin and other tissues, which we rely on as surgeons to do this operation. And we don't have the experience of having said we've done 50 of these.
Speaker 9: I have a 100% of people who've had genital surgery have had postoperative depression.
Speaker 7: I told my mom, I kinda just broke down crying to her one night about how this was the biggest mistake in my life. Life.
Speaker 9: Something that I always talk about and say, look, this is a big surgery.
Speaker 4: We're seeing, certainly very high levels of satisfaction.
Speaker 7: I mean, my breasts are gone permanently. I have no idea about, like, the whether I'll be able to have kids.
Speaker 6: It's pretty disconcerting in certain ways. It's like, woah. You know, this is what occurs while Jazz is having her surgery, and the doctors sometimes don't see eye to eye.
Speaker 5: We can just advance it to there. Jess, let me go. But it doesn't make any sense. Why do you need to cut that?
Speaker 4: Because this is a disfiguring scar.
Speaker 5: How do you know it's not a disfiguring scar? That's just the sulcus. These are the 2 labia. I mean, you may be right, but we don't know. Just Why don't we just open this up and then see what this is for?
Speaker 4: Gets input from around the world, with available science that that, provides input and consensus.
Speaker 5: Let me go.
Speaker 8: I will say that I feel like
Speaker 10: things should happen in a more methodical way.
Speaker 5: This needs to advance more because we're off center.
Speaker 4: This has to come down here.
Speaker 5: I mean, this is off center. See, this is tilted. So that In order to get this midline, we need to bring that down more, And that will centralize this.
Speaker 4: It is safe. It is effective, and it's based on science.
Speaker 6: So last time, the major complication was dehiscence. The Right. Stitches started coming apart. How likely do you think that's gonna happen again?
Speaker 4: It's it's always possible. I have optimism that it won't need another surgery.
Speaker 10: There have been many cases where it hasn't gone well.
Speaker 4: Improved self esteem, reduced suicidality.
Speaker 10: 18 times more than the general population committed suicide.
Speaker 3: No one knows why thousands of children like Jazz are transgender.
Speaker 2: It's not based on any scientific evidence, not research.
Speaker 3: There are only theories.
Speaker 2: Everybody is expected to go along with it. And because nobody wants to be a bigot, they want to get to get the boys while they're still in school because they'll probably still be living at home. The parents can help with the extensive aftercare that takes months and it's extremely intensive and lots lots can go wrong.
Speaker 4: I'm happy. I I have a good sense of what we need to do.
Speaker 3: Jazz is fortunate. Her parents and 3 siblings accept her. And as much as they can, keep her safe.
Speaker 6: I might never experience an orgasm.
reSee.it AI Summary
A 14-year-old girl went undercover at a gender clinic and was quickly offered a mastectomy, hysterectomy, and testosterone prescription. The girl self-diagnosed as trans after watching a YouTube influencer. The story received praise for its journalism, but trans activists later vandalized the CBC headquarters. This 3-minute clip is worth listening to.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
This Story Exposes What’s Happening To Kids In Gender Clinics & It’s Horrifying CBC News Canada sent a 14 year old girl undercover into a gender clinic saying she saw a Trans Influencer on YouTube she relates to - Within 5 minutes the clinician has asked her if she wants a mastectomy - Within 7 minutes I think there's talk of a hysterectomy because internal organs can trigger dysphoria - Within nine minutes, she's got a prescription for testosterone “No parents there. This is a 14 year old girl telling the story that she basically self-diagnosed as trans because she saw someone online. So incredible piece of journalism, great article that came out with it. And then trans activists, a couple of weeks later, smashed the windows of the CBC headquarters in Montreal.” This 3 minute clip is an INSANE listen
Video Transcript AI Summary
A 14-year-old girl was quickly prescribed testosterone at a pediatric gender clinic in Quebec after self-diagnosing as trans due to online influence. The CBC's investigative report on this incident led to trans activists vandalizing their headquarters and issuing a statement defending the right to experiment with their bodies, despite potential mistakes. The activists demand no state interference while expecting state funding for modifications. Concerns are raised about young individuals being led into transitioning without full understanding, as seen with the girl's case. The activists' extreme actions and threats of further retaliation highlight the contentious nature of the issue.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The most amazing part of this story is that the CBC did this. They did an incredible piece of investigative journalism, like real journalism. They sent a 14 year old actress undercover into a pediatric gender clinic somewhere in Quebec. She told this story, it's filmed, and she tells this story to the doctor. She has an eating disorder, and she went on YouTube or whatever, and she came across a trans influencer who also had an eating disorder, but realized that they were trends, and that's why they had the eating disorder.
So then they transitioned, and everything was wonderful The the problem solved. They feel great about themselves. She's telling this story to the general clinician. Within 5 minutes, the clinician has asked her if she wants mastectomy. Within 7 minutes, I think there's talk of a hysterectomy because internal organs can trigger dysphoria.
And within 9 minutes, she's got a prescription for testosterone. No parents there. This is a 14 year old girl telling the story that she basically self diagnosed as trans because she saw someone online. So incredible piece of journalism, great article that came out with it. And then transactivists, a couple of weeks later, smashed the windows of the CBC headquarters in Montreal.
And then they released this statement to Bunkers, totally crazy statement that we basically we have the right to experiment in our bodies even if it's even if we make a mistake, we have the right to make these mistakes. You, the state, should not be interfering, and then a whole lot of absolutely outrageous accusations about the far right. And if you carry on reporting like this, this transphobic reporting, we will fight back again. There will be further retaliation. That's what the statement says.
But bear in mind, what they are responding to. They're responding to a story about a 14 year old who was put on testosterone after 9 minutes. And she basically told the doctor that she came to that conclusion online, and she has an eating disorder. So that is what why they smashed the windows because they think that 14 year old should have the right to experiment as she sees fit even if it means making a mistake. That is actually what they're responding to.
Of course, they're looking at it through their own very selfish lens of, I want to be able to modify my body however I choose. I want the state to pay for it. We don't want state interference, but we do want the state to fund it. And I don't care about the 14 year old girl. They they have no concern for the collateral damage, which is all of these young kids who they are just getting sucked into something way bigger than they understand.
They're just interpreting their normal teenage angst and pubital woes as being a sign that they are transgender. And then crazy doctors like this one in Quebec give them a prescription for testosterone. But these activists are sort of they've already smashed windows. They're threatening retaliation. And this is only the beginning.
reSee.it AI Summary
A whistleblower on Dr Phil reveals disturbing information about the transgender industry, including patients wanting to reverse their transitions and doctors being told to stay silent. This is a serious issue that should be legally addressed.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
A whistleblower tells Dr Phil patients were begging “to have breasts put back on” and bosses told medics to 'keep silent' on de-transitioners. The Trans industry is monstrous for what they are doing to these children and every last person participating in this should be criminally charged.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The hospital was found to be secretly performing gender affirming procedures on children as young as 11, despite claiming to have stopped. Doctors implanted drug delivery devices in kids, causing irreversible effects. A ban on gender affirming care for minors was implemented in Texas. A whistleblower exposed the hospital's lies, leading to changes in state laws. Medical professionals were criticized for providing irreversible treatments without sufficient evidence. Concerns were raised about the lack of proper protocols and the rush to medically transition minors. The whistleblower and another former clinic worker shared their experiences of medical harms and questionable practices.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The hospital was secretly performing these procedures on children as young as 11.
Speaker 1: I will go through the wrong puberty, making permanent changes to
Speaker 2: me that I do not want.
Speaker 3: Quote, unquote, this gender affirming care could be investigated as child abuse. The most important hormonal process in the development of children into adults is stopped.
Speaker 4: Doctors are acting like they're god. We were lying to parents.
Speaker 3: They had said they would no longer provide hormone related interventions for transgender kids.
Speaker 0: Did they stop?
Speaker 3: They did not. They were implanting these drug delivery device in children as young as 11, 12, 13 years old.
Speaker 5: A ban on gender affirming medical care for transgender youth went went into effect in Texas today, making it the most populous state to date with such a ban. An estimated 30,000 young people in Texas between the ages of 13 17 identify as transgender. The new law revokes the medical licenses of any doctor who provides minors with gender affirming medical care.
Speaker 6: 22 states have laws on the books that ban some form of gender affirming care for transgender minors. Meaning, they either ban puberty blockers, hormone treatments, or surgeries, or all 3. Without getting this medication,
Speaker 1: I will go through the wrong puberty, making permanent changes to me
Speaker 2: that I do not want.
Speaker 7: These are things that are being done to children under the age of 18 that are irreversible, that will cause side effects, complications, and abnormalities that they will have to live with for the entirety of the rest of their life.
Speaker 0: I have studied the research, and there is no other instance where a medical profession has proceeded with little or no evidence showing whether or not these hormonal treatments are safe long term. And these treatments certainly are not reversible. That's exactly why our guest tonight, doctor Anton Haim, says he blew the whistle on Texas Children's Hospital. Doctor Haim made major headlines after claiming the hospital was secretly performing these procedures on children as young as 11.
Speaker 3: In March of 2022, the Texas attorney general Ken Paxton issued an opinion stating that, quote unquote, this gender affirming care could be investigated as child abuse. So in response to that, Texas Children's Hospital, the largest children's hospital in the world, issued a statement publicly, unequivocally stating they were going to shut down the transgender program. And for me, this was a huge relief. But it was very soon after that I found out this was categorically untrue. People would tell me about how they were implanting these puberty blocking devices into 11, 12, 13 year old kids.
They told me about how these kids had all these psychiatric issues that were going unmanaged and just being attributed to this one thing. The reason they were hiding this program was because they knew it was controversial. They knew that the people of Texas wouldn't approve of it. Every kid who walks into that clinic is being told that they have to adopt this identity. Instead of telling these kids that they're perfect the way they are and they can grow up to be something amazing, and they're doing it for their own self righteousness.
And once I knew that was happening, it was something that I knew I had to do something about because if people knew I had the ability to make a change or speak up about it and they knew I stayed silent, then, you know, I could never forgive myself and I don't think future generations would too.
Speaker 0: Well, doctor Haim joins us today, and I wanna be very clear about one thing because I have looked at the documentation that you provided, and it looks to me like you went to painstaking levels to protect the identity of the patients involved.
Speaker 3: Yeah. So absolutely nothing was disclosed. I mean, it was important for me as a doctor, you have a responsibility to take care of patients. And you go into medicine because you wanna do that. You wanna protect patients from the diseases that affect them.
But you never imagine that you have to protect these patients from the hospitals. And when I knew that the hospital was lying to the public about this program, I have a responsibility to do something about it. I have a responsibility as a surgeon and then as a person.
Speaker 0: You spoke up because you said the hospital was lying to the public about what they were and were not doing. Correct?
Speaker 3: Yes, sir. In March 2022, they had said they would no longer provide hormone related interventions for transgender kids because of the legal risks. And that is as unequivocal as it gets.
Speaker 0: Did they stop?
Speaker 3: So they did not. And the reason I I knew that because I worked there. You know, in the months following that, people I worked with had told me they were implanting these drug delivery devices in children as young as 11, 12, 13 years old. And, you know, to to hear that this was still happening after the fact that they said they had stopped was unimaginable. You know, every indication was that this program was shut down.
But behind closed doors, they not only continued it, but expanded it into a multidisciplinary clinic. And when I saw that they were having lectures, they were giving the the directors of a program that supposedly did not exist. They were given the opportunity to speak at the hospital's most prestigious lecture series. They were giving conferences where they were talking about concealing it from the public. And as a doctor, you know, you have a responsibility to the people you take care of.
If you're not willing to defend what you're doing to those people in the public eye, then it's very likely you're doing something very, very wrong.
Speaker 0: Tell us what we're looking at here.
Speaker 3: Yeah. So what you can see is that they were continuing these procedures after they said they had stopped. And, what the drug delivery devices are is, you know, small device, you know, maybe about centimeter or 2 centimeters, you know, not not very big. And you, place it into the arm of a patient, and it will deliver, puberty blockers into their body for a long period of time, delaying, well, preventing the onset of puberty. So the most important hormonal process in the development of children into adults is stopped.
So that just doesn't affect, like, your your mind. It has huge effects on your mind, but it affects your body in permanent ways.
Speaker 0: Now some of the people on this schedule were young as 11. Insert a non biodegradable drug delivery implant. Female to male transgender person. This was in May of 23, 10 AM, patient age 12, female, specialty services requested, gender dysphoria in pediatric patient scheduled June 12, 2023, 10:45 AM. Patient, age 12, male, starting puberty blockers.
This is the evidence that you had in addition to other things that this was continuing. What do you make of the fact that these major medical organizations have signed off on this absent studies that show there aren't negative consequences to this long term.
Speaker 3: You know, I I think that's probably the most difficult thing for people to understand. Now you have all these prestigious institutions, all these prestigious hospitals who are signing off on this and endorsing it. But the fact is it's not based on any evidence. It's not based on any even logical reasoning. They can't even define the terms in which they're seeking to intervene on, and this is not medicine.
Speaker 0: And you believe that the information that you released may have influenced the passing of state bill 14, which raises the age to 18 for children to be able to receive this?
Speaker 3: I I think so. Yeah.
Speaker 0: The Democratic state representative, Sean Terry, voted for the bill, and this video of her has gotten 2,300,000 views on social media. Take a look.
Speaker 8: Members, it is out of respect, caring, and friendship for every member of this body that I would like to share my position on this very complex issue. I am making a decision to place the safety and well-being of all young people over the comfort of political expediency. It is my core belief and conclusion that we should remain consistent in the premise that children must be given special provisions under the law as they cannot fully appreciate the long time long term consequences of their actions. As such, the best practice should be to raise the age to 18 for gender modification. Moving forward with this prudent policy, we should also ensure that vulnerable children and teenagers have quality access to mental health care that is safe and in a safe and in a supportive environment Only by taking a careful, compassionate, and evidence based approach to this issue can we guarantee that we are doing what is truly in the best interest of our children?
Speaker 0: I think what she's saying in essence is these comorbid conditions that exist with the diagnosis should be dealt with in a mental health environment and at least treated and resolved before any kind of treatment that's considered gender affirming care be undertaken.
Speaker 4: I was working in a pediatric gender center for four and a half years, primarily responsible for patient intakes. The center followed this message that transition would solve everything, that it would solve a child's mental health problems. There were very few written protocols or guidelines. One of the providers even said we were flying the plane as we built it. Doctors are acting like their god when it comes to medically transitioning children.
Children could identify themselves as transgender, see a therapist for one visit, see our endocrinologist for one visit, and end up with hormones that would impact and change their bodies for their lifetime. These were identities that were still shifting and changing, but the treatments were irreversible and permanent. I saw a young person who was begging to have their breasts put back on after having surgery. We were encouraged not to make a big deal out of it and definitely not to tell other families. I couldn't continue to be silent on it.
The medical harms and trauma that I saw with these teens just took over my life. I was told I could no longer raise concerns or even use the phrase, I have concerns about a patient. I have no trust in this industry, medically transitioning minors anymore.
Speaker 0: Well, Jamie, thank you for being here.
Speaker 4: Thank you for having me.
Speaker 0: You describe yourself as a queer woman married to a transgender man.
Speaker 4: Yes.
Speaker 0: And you're a member of the LGBTQ community, and you went there to do something good, something positive at this clinic in Saint Louis. What changed your mind?
Speaker 4: A number of things. We started to see patients who were experiencing very significant medical harms. Being rushed to the emergency room with lacerations requiring stitches. We had patients contact us who were begging to have body parts put back on within months of having surgeries. And the thing that kept happening is every time I would raise concerns and ask about the protocols and ask about the guidelines, This is just how the industry works.
If a child says they're trans, there's no questioning it. We just say, yep. You're trans. What would you like?
Speaker 0: You're you're telling me that a 12 or 13 year old who can't decide which pajamas to wear can come in and say, I've decided that I wanna transition. And with no more than a couple of hours or 2 visits, not even a couple of hours, 2 visits, they say, okay, start taking this, start doing this, which alters their biochemistry in a way that you can't come back from.
Speaker 4: Correct.
Speaker 0: And you you say you saw dramatic increases in teenage girls that had no previous history of gender distress, and they suddenly declared themselves transgender and demanded immediate testosterone blockers?
Speaker 4: Yeah. When I started, so I was there for four and a half years. When I started, I maybe would have 5 to 10 new incoming patients a month. By the time I left, it was close to 50 every single month. My background is in clinical research, and so I started looking at the data.
I wanted to know what the numbers told me. And towards the end of my tenure, 73% of the new patients coming to us were girls who were in their teen years. So in that really vulnerable age of like 13 to 16, where they are just exposed to so many social pressures. And they're so empathetic to what's going on around them too, that they really pick up on what's going on in their peer group. We had clusters where it would be a handful of 1 whole high school classroom would come in all trans identified.
Speaker 0: Historically, this typically would be males.
Speaker 8: Yeah.
Speaker 0: And you would have a female how often?
Speaker 4: Oh, very rare. And also the ages were different. So it would would usually be younger boys who seemed very feminine or had feminine traits to their family. And their families would seek care trying to understand what was going on for for their young male child. This was never something that would start in adolescence.
And these girls were also learning on TikTok, Instagram, they would come in and they would almost have the exact same storyline too. Like they learned what to say from a video to explain, oh, no, really, I've felt this way from early childhood, but a lot of their parents couldn't remember anything like that. And part of what's going on right now is that if you question this at all, you are immediately called transphobic, You're immediately called homophobic. You're immediately considered a bigot, and it's just not scientific reality.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Video Source: https://youtu.be/L_UCcoqR3dg?si=OHsLYuIZ9nUJPHir
@JanuaryDoNoHarm - January Littlejohn
How do @UMichAlumni feel about their university not only promoting gender ideology pseudoscience to their pediatric patients, but also chemically castrating children with puberty blockers & performing double mastectomies on teen girls? Let’s meet one of their doctors. 🧵 https://t.co/kdNrszz3xl
Video Transcript AI Summary
Michigan Medicine strives to be a safe, welcoming place for transgender individuals and to provide excellent health care regardless of gender. The goal of this video is to improve the comfort and competency of frontline staff in caring for transgender individuals. We will start by talking about gender identity, challenges the transgender community has faced in the health care system, and Michigan's policies regarding gender non-discrimination. The second half of this training is job specific.
To discuss gender identity, it is important to understand the difference between sex and gender. Sex refers to one's reproductive organs, native hormones, and chromosomes, while gender identity refers to one's internal sense of gender, a person's basic sense of being a man or boy, a woman or girl, or another gender. Gender identity can be expressed by how individuals present themselves socially, including clothing, physical characteristics, speech, and mannerisms. All people, whether they are transgender or cisgender, meaning not transgender, have a gender identity and expression. Transgender is a term for individuals whose gender identity differs from the gender identity typically associated with their sex assigned at birth. There are many identities that fall under the umbrella of transgender.
Transgender men, trans men, or trans masculine refer to people who are assigned female sex at birth but identify as men or masculine. Transgender women, trans women, or trans feminine refer to people who were assigned male sex at birth but identify as women or feminine. Other individuals may identify as genderqueer, agender, genderfluid, two spirited, bigender, or another identity that does not fit neatly into the categories of men or women. All major American medical societies, including the American Medical Association and American Psychological Association, endorse gender affirming care as the standard of care for transgender individuals. This means caring for people in a way that supports their gender transition and gender identity.
Transgender people may undergo any one of a number of gender affirming medical interventions, including hormonal therapies like estrogen, testosterone, or hormone blockers, and surgical treatment to change body contours or genitalia. However, it is important to note that one does not have to undergo any medical or surgical treatment to be transgender. Some people are easily read as the gender they affirm while others are visibly gender non conforming or androgynous appearing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Michigan Medicine strives to be a safe, welcoming place for transgender individuals and to provide excellent health care regardless of gender. The goal of this video is to improve the comfort and competency of frontline staff in caring for transgender individuals. We will start by talking about gender identity, challenges the transgender community has faced in the health care system, and Michigan's policies regarding gender non discrimination. The second half of this training is job specific. In order to discuss gender identity, it is important to understand the difference between sex and gender.
Sex refers to one's reproductive organs, native hormones, and chromosomes, while gender identity refers to one's internal sense of gender, a person's basic sense of being a man or boy, a woman or girl, or another gender. Gender identity can be expressed by how individuals present themselves socially, including clothing, physical characteristics, speech, and mannerisms. All people, whether they are transgender or cisgender, meaning not transgender, have a gender identity and expression. Transgender is a term for individuals whose gender identity differs from the gender identity typically associated with their sex assigned at birth. There are many identities that fall under the umbrella of transgender.
Transgender men, trans men, or trans masculine refer to people who are assigned female sex at birth but identify as men or masculine. Transgender women, trans women, or trans feminine refer to people who were assigned male sex at birth but identify as women or feminine. Other individuals may identify as genderqueer, agender, genderfluid, two spirited, bigender, or another identity that does not fit neatly into the categories of men or women. All major American medical societies, including the American Medical Association and American Psychological Association, endorse gender affirming care as the standard of care for transgender individuals. This means caring for people in a way that supports their gender transition and gender identity.
Transgender people may undergo any one of a number of gender affirming medical interventions, including hormonal therapies like estrogen, testosterone, or hormone blockers, and surgical treatment to change body contours or genitalia. However, it is important to note that one does not have to undergo any medical or surgical treatment to be transgender. Some people are easily read as the gender they affirm while others are visibly gender non conforming or androgynous appearing.
@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense
🚨 CONTENT WARNING: Did you know that transgender surgery on children began in the 1960s? And that its pioneer was a staff member of @JohnsHopkins who was later discovered to be a child abuser? Background: Bruce Reimer was the elder of infant twin boys born in 1965. When Bruce was seven or eight months old, his parents Janet and Ron had him circumcised. The physician botched the procedure and the infant's penis was burned off. Bruce’s parents Janet and Ron then approached John Money, a professor of pediatrics and medical psychology at Johns Hopkins University, to inquire whether Money’s recently published theories on “gender roles” and “sexual orientation” — both new terms invented by Money — might provide some help for their injured son. Money told them, in short, that the answer was to raise their injured son as a girl. They proceeded to have Bruce castrated, administered feminizing hormones, and brought in for office visits to Money throughout childhood wherein “therapies” were given to Bruce that involved pornography and “sexual rehearsal play” with his twin brother. At the age of 13, Bruce (who’d been called “Brenda” since infancy) was so distraught that his local psychotherapist insisted that his parents tell him the truth about himself. As soon as Bruce learned the truth, he insisted on living as a male, and even re-named himself “David” (as in David-against-Goliath). Decades later as an adult, David publicly revealed what happened to him in childhood. Several books and articles were published about his testimony — a comprehensive list is available from the Intersex Society of North America: https://isna.org/faq/reimer/. Sadly, David’s story came to an end when he committed suicide at the age of 38. No one knows these kinds of stories better than @Miriam_Grossman, M.D., a 40-year child psychiatrist who encounters gender dysphoria as the dominant complaint at her busy practice.
Video Transcript AI Summary
There has been a 5000% increase in adolescents suddenly expressing discomfort with their bodies, which parents report seems to appear "out of the blue." This rapid onset gender dysphoria is often found in kids with conditions like autism, depression, anxiety, trauma, or abuse, and in difficult family situations.
This phenomenon tends to happen in clusters, with many kids identifying as transgender or non-binary having friends who also identify that way. This suggests an element of social contagion, where feelings, behaviors, or beliefs spread within a friend group. Some children's social lives are primarily online, where they are influenced to question their identity and assume a new one, sometimes by older individuals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We are dealing now with this epidemic, 5000% increase of kids who never before adolescents who never before expressed discomfort with their bodies and it's rapid onset because it develops the parents say that it seems to them to be out of the blue. That they were that their child for many years was happy, content with being a boy or a girl, and then there's a change. It is found in kids who have comorbid conditions such as autism, depression, anxiety, a history of trauma, of being molested, of being abused, and, all all sorts of family situations and difficulties. Also, it it tends to happen in clusters. So most of the kids that are coming now and identifying as being transgender or non binary, if you ask them, they have someone in their friend group, at least one, commonly a few of their friends who are also identifying in that way and there have, you know, new names, new pronouns.
So there's an element of contagion. Social contagion is a well known phenomenon in mental health. What it means is that feelings or behaviors or beliefs can spread within a friend group. It's very common now to be best friend have a whole group of friends that are online. You never met them.
You may not know, you know, where they're from. And I've had a number of cases of kids coming into my office in which their social life is primarily online. And that they have been influenced, to to question who they are and to assume a new identity only because of people that have they have met online. Sometimes older individuals who are bringing them into this belief system.
Who was David Reimer (also, sadly, known as John/Joan)? | Intersex Society of North America
David Reimer was born an identical (non-intersex) twin boy in 1965. At the age of 8 months, David and his brother each had a minor medical problem involving his penis, and a doctor decided to treat the problem with circumcision. The doctor botched the circumcision on David, using an inappropriate method and accidentally burning off virtually all of David’s penis. At the advice of psychologist John Money at Johns Hopkins University, David’s parents agreed to have him “sex reassigned” and made into a girl via surgical, hormonal, and psychological treatments—i.e., via the system Money advocated for intersex children.
isna.org
@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense
Full interview with @maryhollandnyc + @Miriam_Grossman: https://t.co/wFSkkxnxlB
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently spoke with Clementine, who underwent puberty blockers at 12, testosterone at 13, and a double mastectomy at 14. During our discussion, a UCLA student tried to justify these actions, showing a troubling disregard for the harm done to children. Clementine's story is heartbreaking; she suffered sexual abuse and was pressured into transitioning. Now at 20, she faces irreversible consequences and struggles to get reconstructive surgery. I admire her bravery in sharing her experience and hope it raises awareness about the issues within the gender clinic system.
@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸
This UCLA student just heard me speak with Clementine — a young woman who was given puberty blockers at 12, testosterone at 13, and a double mastectomy at 14. After hearing all that, was she horrified? Sad? Angry? Filled with compassion? No. She stepped in to try to justify what happened to Clementine, as though it was ‘medicine.’ At first, she pretends she’s not doing that, but I know. People communicate with more than just their words. By the end of the conversation she removes her mask and says we shouldn’t even call a girl a girl. Trans activists don’t care about the harm being done to kids. They care about the ideology. This is a cult.
@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸
Here is my conversation with Clementine. The other student is just off screen for most of it, listening. It still blows my mind how some people don’t care.
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared shocking statistics revealing that up to 179 girls under 12.5 have undergone double mastectomies, highlighting concerns about young girls being influenced to identify as boys. Andrew Gold expressed disbelief at this information. I also encouraged support for my mission to address these issues, emphasizing the urgency as we approach 2025.
@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸
“In the U.S., we know from insurance data that up 179 girls under the age of 12.5 have had double mastectomies.” -@BillboardChris “Say that again,” says @AndrewGold_ok, in shock. “Up to 179 girls under 12.5 have had double mastectomies. We’re talking about 12-year-old girls getting their breasts cut off when they’ve hardly formed because they’ve been taught that they’re boys on the inside.” The proof:
Video Transcript AI Summary
I have two daughters and can’t imagine telling them they were born wrong. That idea is harmful and misguided. Medical interventions like halting puberty, administering opposite-sex hormones, and performing surgeries on children are alarming. In the U.S., insurance data shows that up to 179 girls under 12 and a half have undergone double mastectomies. This means young girls are having their breasts removed because they’ve been led to believe they are boys inside.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've got 2 girls. I can't imagine ever telling them that they were born wrong. That message itself is extraordinarily abusive and stupid. But then to medicalize them, to stop their puberty from happening, to stop their natural development, to give them the opposite sex hormones which are causing a host of problems, to cut off body parts of kids. This is what's happening.
In the US, we know from insurance data that up to 179 girls under the age of 12 and a half have had double mastectomies. Say that again. Up to 179 girls under 12 and a half have had double mastectomies. We're talking about 12 year old girls getting their breasts cut off when they've hardly formed because they've been taught that they're boys on the inside.
A Consensus No Longer
The American Society of Plastic Surgeons becomes the first major medical association to challenge the consensus of medical groups over “gender-affirming care” for minors.
city-journal.org
@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸
Full video. Please follow @AndrewGold_ok! His Heretics podcast is among the very best. https://t.co/4sUN4dsF7o
Video Transcript AI Summary
I've got two daughters and can't imagine telling them they were born wrong. The idea that kids are being sterilized and undergoing surgeries is abusive. Transgender identity is not the same as being gay; many kids with gender dysphoria grow up to be gay. The rise in trans identification among girls is alarming, and many are being pushed into medical transitions without proper mental health evaluations. This ideology is being promoted in schools, leading to parental rights being undermined. The narrative that transitioning is necessary to prevent suicide is manipulative and lacks scientific backing. Ultimately, there are two sexes, and the concept of gender as a separate identity is a fabrication. Conversations about these issues are crucial, and many young people are starting to question the prevailing ideology.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've got 2 girls. I can't imagine ever telling them that they were born wrong. That message itself is extraordinarily abusive and stupid. Kids are being sterilized and having body parts removed. They're being turned into lifelong pharmaceutical patients up to 179 girls under the age of 12 and a half.
I've had
Speaker 1: Say that again.
Speaker 0: Up to 179 girls.
Speaker 1: There's just there's just no science for that, is there? Of course not.
Speaker 0: Trans is not the same as gay, and the left has been very successful in conflating these two things. They call it the LGBTQ2SIA plus community. Those are just a bunch of letters. It's not a community. Ask them questions.
Ask them to define these terms because no one can. Parents are losing their children to the states because they won't affirm a delusion that their child was born in the wrong body.
Speaker 1: With your own kids, have you experienced schools trying to pass pass that stuff onto them? I spoke
Speaker 0: with the principal for 45 minutes, and he was a cop.
Speaker 1: Is that your name, Billboard, Chris? Obviously, it's not, but that's sort of become your thing, hasn't it?
Speaker 0: Yeah. My parents had a lot of foresight when they named
Speaker 1: me.
Speaker 0: I like that. My my name's Chris Elston, but, yeah, I started off this campaign with an actual billboard and then one in Vancouver that said I love JK Rowling. They took it down. I was following the lead of Kelly J Keene in England who put up a sign at the Edinburgh train station. Mhmm.
That said, I love JK Rowling. They took it down after one day because some people on Twitter complained that it was hate speech. And I was reading Harry Potter at the time with my little one every night at bedtime. She was 8 at the time or actually 7 back then. And I'd been learning all about this business of puberty blockers, cross sex hormones, childhood sex changes.
I couldn't believe what was happening to kids. And I couldn't believe we weren't allowed to talk about it, and we couldn't even say we love the world's greatest children's author. So I put up a big billboard in Vancouver that said the same thing. It also lasted just a day. Vancouver politicians said it was hate speech.
I then put up a whole bunch more throughout the US.
Speaker 1: Just saying I love JK Rowling.
Speaker 0: That's right.
Speaker 1: Who who is the world's most beloved author, children's author, and who also is a really progressive liberal. She made Dumbledore gay, she said afterwards. She's done a lot for women's rights. She's given I think I've I've heard something that she was the only billionaire who was no longer a billionaire because of the amount of money she's given to charities and things like that.
Speaker 0: That's right. She had donated herself out of the billionaire class. I think she's probably back in there. If you walk into any bookstore these days, it's they've tried to cancel her, but Harry Potter is bigger than ever. Mhmm.
But, yeah, I just wanted to start conversations. And so the billboard was a means of starting conversations. Not everyone understood what that meant. Why would someone put up an I love JK Rowling billboard? But then they look it up and they figure it out.
But anyway, that was all in September 2020 and then starting in October, I'm just a normal guy from Canada, from the West Coast, Vancouver suburbs. And I had embarked on a long mission to help put an end to this child abuse. And my philosophy is we do this one conversation at a time by educating people. And ideally we kick this old school and we talk people face to face. So they took down my billboard but they can't take one off my back.
So I know I look very ridiculous probably. Normally people wearing signs are out there preaching about the end of the world or something. But I had some signs made. The first one said, I love J. K.
Rowling and gender ideology does not belong in schools. Today, my main sign that I normally wear is children cannot consent to puberty blockers. And I just go outside. I go to downtown Vancouver. I started traveling across Canada.
The borders were closed at the time because of COVID. When the borders opened up in November of 2021, I started travelling into the States. And now I'm making my way all around the world. And I've had tens of thousands of conversations about this, and I record them, I post them on social media. So it helps to educate people and it's been incredibly successful.
We have now 25 states in the US that have passed legislation to stop this. Other countries are putting an end to it. That's all not me. Of course, it's many people, But part of what I'm doing is trying to activate others to speak about this too. And I just keep making friends, and I just take it one day at a time.
Speaker 1: What would you say to people who say, look, 40 years ago, people were saying this stuff about gay people. They were saying, you know, I'll keep it out of our schools. It's a social contagion. This is a terrible thing. What would you say to those people?
Speaker 0: So trans is not the same as gay, and the left has been very successful in conflating these two things. They call it the LGBTQ 2SIA plus community. Those are just a bunch of letters. It's not a community. You don't have gay men really hanging out with lesbians.
Transgenderism is about a denial of reality. It's got nothing to do with being gay. But the one connection there is is that many of these kids who experience distress with their sex, distress about their gender. I don't like that word. I don't use it.
But historically kids with gender dysphoria, a majority of them grew up to be gay. I talked to a woman on the streets of Lisbon just 2 days ago. When her boy was 3 years old he wanted to wear dresses, he wanted to be a girl. He was a very effeminate boy growing up. He preferred to bake cookies than play sports with the boys.
And he grew up and he's now a healthy gay man. If he was growing up today for sure he'd be told he was trans and he'd be indoctrinated to believe that he was born in the wrong body which is an extraordinarily abusive thing to tell a child. I've got 2 girls I can't imagine ever telling them that they were born wrong. That message itself is extraordinarily abusive and stupid. But then to medicalize them, to stop their puberty from happening, to stop their natural development, to give them the opposite sex hormones which are causing a host of problems, to cut off body parts of kids.
This is what's happening. In the US, we know from insurance data that up to 179 girls under the age of 12 and a half have had double mastectomies. Say that again. Up to 179 girls under 12a half have had double mastectomies. We're talking about 12 year old girls getting their breasts cut off when they've hardly formed because they've been taught that they're boys on the inside.
Speaker 1: There's just there's just no science
Speaker 0: for that, is there? Of course not. This isn't just the US. Now they're the worst when it comes to surgeries for sure. But I I live in British Columbia Canada and a nurse who used to work for Transhealth BC wrote a couple months ago that a 12 year old girl there had had a double mastectomy.
I was just in Switzerland, I spoke at the UN in Geneva a few days ago And I met with a father who has lost his daughter to the state. They can't go public with their identities, but I also met with a parent group there. And at least 10 girls, even in Switzerland under the age of 14 have had double mastectomies. So then at each age 13, 14, 15, 16 the numbers get bigger. And then there's tons happening to 18 and 19 year olds too.
And are they adults? Yes. Do they have the legal right to make decisions on their own? Yes. But doctors should not be just order takers.
They're not working in a McDonald's drive through work. Someone comes through and says, give me a Big Mac and here you go. If a girl comes in and says, give me a double mastectomy, they shouldn't just be saying, here you go. They should be screening for trauma and abuse and other mental health comorbidities because in every one of these cases, there are other issues going on. Anxiety, depression, eating disorders, bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder, abusive parents, sexual abuse is very common.
The former president of the American College of Pediatricians says he estimates about 60% of these kids have had sexual abuse. And autism is the number one. Right. Commonality. The Tavistock in the UK which has now been shut down published their own statistics out of a sample of 10 69 kids, 35% had moderate to severe autism.
Some of these kids are nonverbal. Wow. And they're transitioning them. That's insane. It's totally insane.
Earlier this year, I know you spoke with Mia Hughes recently. She's a friend of mine from Canada. She published the WPATH files with Michael Shellenberger. And in there are internal emails from these WPATH doctors, videos from their internal conferences where they admit to kids with dissociative identity disorder or schizophrenia are being transitioned. Some of these kids have multiple personalities And one personality will identify as trans and the other doesn't, but they're still transitioning them anyway.
Speaker 1: That's insane. I feel you I feel the emotion in your voice when you speak about it. It's not just now, but I've seen you speak about this many times. And, you know, this this is something that's that's very, very important to you, understandably.
Speaker 0: Yes. So someone asked me I was speaking with a journalist from Germany yesterday, and she asked me why are you so passionate about this? I often wonder why isn't everybody else so passionate about this especially parents. When you have kids everyone should understand this. I understand why people might not be as passionate if they don't have kids.
They haven't put as much thought into it and they don't have as much skin in the game. But when you have kids, your life ceases to be about you and it's all about your children. And I cannot imagine if my girls came home or they've been down some rabbit hole on the Internet, which is happening in virtually all of these cases. And they're having a tough time during puberty and now they don't wanna be a girl anymore and they think they're a boy. That's bad enough.
But now you have state encroachment on parental rights happening all across the west where parents are losing their children to the states because they won't affirm a delusion that the child was born in the wrong body. And when you sit down and talk with parents, as I do, especially the dads, I've talked to lots of moms, but the dads reach out to me more than they will a lot of the other people speaking about this because I'm a man, right? And I sit down at Tim Hortons coffee shop in Canada across some burly dude and he's bawling his eyes out because his autistic little girl thinks she's a boy and he can't speak out about it because he's afraid child protective services is gonna take his kid away. And these parents feel powerless. And in many cases kids are now being separated from their family or they're growing up and they're never talking to their parents again.
All because they got captured by some cult. And I do view this as a cult. When you look at all cults it has similarities. People self police their own thoughts. They don't allow themselves to look at the evidence.
There's love bombing which captures them in the first place. So think about it. You've got all these kids who aren't thriving in life. These aren't the high school cheerleaders and the quarterbacks. These are the kids who have body image issues, eating disorders, they're autistic, they feel like they don't fit in and maybe they're same sex attracted as well because that's very common, but this ideology comes along and tells them the reason for their discomfort is because they were born wrong.
And then they get love bombed by this new community. Whereas previously they didn't have a lot of friends. Now they'll write on social media because all these kids are on social media that they've just come out as trans boom, 10,000 likes all these endorphins. And it feels good because they're getting some love for the first time, some fake love. And I say it's fake love because the moment they leave this cult, all of their friends attack them and say they weren't ever really truly trans.
Because these people don't want these children to be their true selves. They just want them to be trans.
Speaker 1: That's interesting. Yeah. Which I suppose is the same in all the cults. I suppose there's also an element of the further you go with the surgeries, it's almost like you're going up the, you know, either channel about the Scientology and, you know, it's like you're going up the OT levels. You're you're operating theta level.
You're you're at 1, then you're at 2, and, eventually, you get to sort of Tom Cruise level where you've completely transitioned and you're at the top of the game.
Speaker 0: Yeah. There's a ton of similarities to that. Similar to Scientology, Scientology practices disconnection. These kids are encouraged to do the same. You've got your glitter family now.
You don't need your real family. We'll be your family. Jehovah's Witnesses, it's the same thing unless you buy into it all completely. They practice what's called shunning. And people are losing their mothers, daughters, sisters, brothers.
Speaker 1: So And the the the abuse that goes on within those cults as well. Jehovah's Witness famous for the the 2 the 2 witness rule that it didn't happen unless there were 2 witnesses there. These kinds all these cults, they these places where anything can go on within them, that's that's the kind of environment that I think, sorry, that is created in in the the sort of trans community.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And then unlike cults though, the one thing that's really dangerous about this is it has institutional backing. It has government backing. It has super national government backing where the UN is pushing this, the World Health Organization. All the leftist governments throughout the world are pushing this as though we have a gender identity which might be different than our sex.
And so one of my tactics when I'm out on the street having these conversations is there's really 2 main things when I'm dealing with someone who's kind of hostile to me is number one thing would be to say things they agree with, which is the positive message that our children are beautiful just as they are, that there's no right or wrong way to be a boy or a girl. Nobody can disagree with that. The most rabid far left individual will have to pause and they'll get confused in that moment when I say that because they come into this not wanting to have a conversation, but to win a conversation. And now I've just said something that they agree with.
Speaker 1: This isn't really useful because people listening and watching now will be thinking I've had to have these conversations with friends of mine who think they're being progressive. So, yeah, keep going and go on.
Speaker 0: What what are the things that I want to know? The progressive things that are true, which is that children are beautiful just as they are. We shouldn't put them in some stereotypical box. If a boy is more effeminate, if a girl is a tomboy, what's wrong with that? There's a term for tomboys.
They're called beautiful girls. They're not actual boys. This ideology is teaching them that they're supposed to be something they're not and that they won't find true happiness unless they change their bodies. So that's totally nuts and it's abusive. But say things they agree with.
They might drop their guard and open up for conversation a bit. But ask them questions. Ask them to define these terms because no one can. I have asked thousands of times what does it mean for a girl to be a boy? Nobody can tell me because of course they can't be.
But a typical response I might get like a woman on the boardwalk in New Jersey last year told me, well, you know, girls like pink and long hair and nail polish. These are girly things. I said, okay, so if a boy likes nail polish, does that make him a girl? And they know how ridiculous that is. Of course.
Speaker 1: And old fashioned.
Speaker 0: And old fashioned. Yes. But when you get right down to this, all it comes down to is stereotypes and roles. And if you ask them what a gender identity is, nobody can tell you. Kids are being sterilized and having body parts removed.
They're being turned into lifelong pharmaceutical patients forever dependent on some exterior source of estrogen or testosterone. Teenage girls are being sent into menopause with with a 100 side effects of its own. They're cutting out their womb because after 4 or 5 years on testosterone they have to get a hysterectomy. Sometimes they're doing an oophorectomy as well where they cut out their ovaries because testosterone causes vaginal and uterine atrophy. So these surgeries become necessary.
So but they're doing all this and they can't even define what a gender identity is. The most used resource in the world. Really there's 2 of them. The genderbread person which is this picture of a gingerbread man. But you can't give it a gendered name of course so it's the genderbread person and it defines your gender identity as being based on your personality, your job, your hobbies, your likes and dislikes.
Good job. Roles in society. Oh my god. And expectations upon you.
Speaker 1: It's so funny how how much that aligns with with some of the more traditional right wing guests I've had on who have spoken sometimes about a woman's role, being different to a man's and things things I disagree with, and that they see this as progressive though somehow in the on the on the trans side.
Speaker 0: Right. And they've been duped. They've all been deceived. But these are just stereotypes. And this resource, this cutesy little picture of a gingerbread man is used in children's hospitals all around the world to educate the staff, to educate the parents, to educate the kids about gender identity.
And then the other resource is called the gender unicorn. Another cartoonish image of a unicorn. Of course, they use these images because kids love them. They love unicorns and rainbows. Right.
And when I was speaking with his father in Geneva the other day, when his daughter decided she was a boy and she was indoctrinated through one of the government schools there, at the hospital, at the children's hospital, they used the gender unicorn to explain what gender identity is. These are resources designed for 5 year olds. But this is the depth of the science behind this. So when I first got into this battle, which it is, this is a war on our kids, I felt like I didn't understand enough about gender And I wanted to do a lot of research. Well, the more you read, the more you realize there is absolutely nothing to this.
And the entirety of this ideology is based on lies, nothing but lies. This is a pure fabrication and invention of man. But it's really taken off because they've combined the T with the LGB and nobody wants to speak out against it because then you're labeled a bigot. And in these leftist political parties, now politicians are a different animal than the people they represent. But in these political parties, unless you're pushing this, you have no chance of ever running for these parties.
They won't allow you. Because the far left have hijacked the entire left. Unless you maintain the most radical positions, you have no chance in politics. So then you end up with all these activists in politics pushing this dangerous ideology on our population. This did not grow organically at all.
The whole movement is inorganic. And we've had this storm of gay rights being won around 2,010, 2015, all around the West. So then what happens to
Speaker 1: all these
Speaker 0: NGOs, all these nonprofits? They don't close their doors. They don't say congrats, everybody. Yeah. We achieved our objective.
They have to keep everyone employed. They gotta keep donations flowing. So the new objective became trans rights. And they've taken what is a mental illness and turned it into a civil rights movement.
Speaker 1: Man, it's so difficult. You've got these people who work for diversity organizations or or trans or gay or gay rights one, those kinds of things. And as you say, what do you do next once you've achieved parity or something at least close to parity? I mean, not just financially, firstly, you gotta work, or what's the next thing we can find, but also a sense of purpose. I've had these debates with people who who did so much good before, and then it's like, okay.
We've got the we've got gay marriage. You know? We've gotta keep pushing and keep going further. And and now we're at the point where, you know, one thing we've not yet touched on is the eradication of the rights of, women and their their spaces.
Speaker 0: That's right. So gender ideology theorizes that your gender is just a feeling. Ultimately, that's all it comes down to. And I have this expression, there are 2 sexes, there are 0 genders and there are infinite personalities. Yeah.
Because that just sums us a lot. And we used gender as a synonym for sex for a long time. A more polite word perhaps. Yeah. But the left has taken this word and they mean they intend for it to mean something entirely different, which is just a feeling based on roles and stereotypes.
This man on the street in Lisbon, psychologist came and spoke with me and Peter Boghosian and Colin Wright the other day. And he admitted towards the end of the conversation that the whole thing was just based on roles. But your role does not determine what sex you are. Embracing feminine roles does not make you a female. These are just stereotypes.
And now, of course, in the world if any man can just say he's a woman, well guess what? There are mentally ill men in the world. There are some bad dudes in the world. And when you open up women as a sex class to anyone who wants to say there are women, of course, people are going to abuse it. I'm from British Columbia.
And a man there named Adam Labukin. And I'm sorry if this gets very graphic, but this guy 3 month old baby boy. He drowned a toddler. The same one? The same no.
2 different kids.
Speaker 1: Oh my god.
Speaker 0: He then identified as a woman in the province of British Columbia, paid for him to get breast implants, and they put him in the Fraser Valley Penitentiary for women. And he's, of course, assaulted a woman there. But these women are literally caged with people like this, with racists. And what do our governments say? They say we're a bigot for speaking out about it.
I tweeted out this picture yesterday at the University of Manitoba in Canada. And this is all over the west, west. But Canada is particularly bad. It says, trust people to know what bathroom is best for them.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I'm not gonna trust people.
Speaker 0: Am I gonna trust some dude following my 12 year old daughter into the washroom? Forget about it.
Speaker 1: What advice is that?
Speaker 0: What kind of man does that? Knowing these guys know they're going to make the women feel uncomfortable and they do it anyway. And look what's happened to sports. People said, oh, there aren't gonna be enough athletes that really harm women's sports. A very mediocre male takes gold medal from women.
Leah Thomas was 450th, I think, in the men's division, 1st in the women's division. They're also taking scholarships. They're also hurting women. And so yes.
Speaker 1: That's a good point you make because a lot of people who are not it's usually people who don't do much sports, who say, oh, what does it really matter? But this scholarships are, you know, often the prizes for these things at universities. It can change someone's life, and and the the likes of Leah Thomas are taking those those opportunities away from women.
Speaker 0: That's right. And also if a woman refuses to compete because she doesn't wanna compete against a man on principle as she should, well, then she can also lose out.
Speaker 1: Well, one of the one of the women who had to get changed with Lea Thomas said he did use to sort of rub against her with his penis, and and was like, oops, and and was was a bit like that. I mean, it's just what kind of place have you gotta be in? Even if you did believe in the whole gender thing, if Leah Thomas does believe in that Mhmm. What what I mean, I I I often say this, like, I'm I'm tall. Right?
You 2 were you tall as well? We're both tall? Yeah.
Speaker 0: I'm 62 in a bit.
Speaker 1: Okay. I'm 64, and and I I was very tall when I was 13. I was already nearly 64, so I hated it. You know, as teenagers, every teenager hates what they are, which is part of this problem, by the way, isn't it? I mean, teenagers, of course, they hate their bodies.
I I never met a teenager who didn't hate their body. Right. You you get through that. And I know that I'm I'm in the way of people when they're at concerts, football games, whatever. And I sort of just feel a bit, you know, oh, I better get out of the way.
And I don't want the world to change for me. I need to change for it. Even though that is an immutable feature, And maybe I shouldn't feel bad, but I do. I don't want people behind not to be able to see. I feel bad.
Whereas, if I thought I was a woman, you know, I feel like I would just say, but you know what? I know that this is gonna make so many women uncomfortable, me in the changing room with them, with my penis out. Even if I believed in the ideology, I think. I suppose someone would say no because if you believed in the ideology, you would say that's just irrelevant. But how can he not see that he's making people so uncomfortable and stealing opportunities from women?
He knows.
Speaker 0: You think? 100%. Of course, he knows. He hears about it all the time. What?
Oh, he hears about it all the time.
Speaker 1: But he might he thinks he thinks we're just, like, bigots.
Speaker 0: Does he really? I don't believe it.
Speaker 1: I think he well, some people must think that.
Speaker 0: You have to be an exceptional narcissist to go along with that, knowing that you're making people uncomfortable or not even thinking about the impact of it. You're a man entering into a woman's space where they're changing naked and you're changing naked in front of them. He knows he's a different sex. Okay? He's got the appendage to prove it.
This is not debatable. He knows this and he does it anyway. Perhaps he gets a thrill from it. A lot of them do. There's a condition called autogynephilia which literally means arousal by pretending that one is a woman.
Wearing women's clothes, going into women's spaces, this is an erotic fetish for these guys. And women are the ones who suffer. So the left has made this out to be you have to be kind and caring and it's not progressive to enforce reality on the world, but this is just the latest in a long string of delusions that mankind has suffered from. And it's not going to be the last one either, because if you look at history, mankind, we are prone to all sorts of crazy things. This is the latest one, but it's one of the biggest ones in history because, again, all governments, especially the leftist governments, are the ones pushing this.
And all of these NGOs with 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars between them are pushing this. And then you combine it with social media. This is the 1st generation of kids that ever had to grow up on social media. And it's catastrophic for them quite apart from the whole trans identification craze. But the kids who are vulnerable are just sitting ducks for this ideology.
Speaker 1: I wonder if if social media, after sort of launching this whole thing might also be what what brings it down. Again, historically, Scientology, it was the Internet that that played a huge role. WikiLeaks and, Anonymous and, South Park, the access to all of these kinds of things. So maybe once the sort of we've hit the top of that wave and it will start to come crashing down and social media will be that vehicle.
Speaker 0: Yeah. The Internet was certainly the death of Scientology because previous to that, nobody could find out the truth about it. If you tried to go to a library anywhere in the world, you couldn't even find a book because they would have their staff go into the libraries, sign out the critical books, and never return them. There's a woman named Paulette Cooper, who wrote a book called Scandal of Scientology. You can never get it from a library because they signed them all out and destroyed them.
But with the Internet, you can't do that censorship anymore. Now, I am seeing a trend. There's a huge split between the sexes on this issue. Young guys, boys in high school, they are not okay with gender ideology. They hate it.
When they see me on the street, they all love me. Almost every single one of them. They give me high fives. I get nothing but support. Even in the beginning when I started this campaign in 2020, people didn't know what was happening.
They had no idea what puberty blockers were. They'd never heard of them. So a lot of people looked at me like I was crazy and maybe I am a little bit crazy. You probably have to be a little bit crazy to do what I do, but they were just confused. And as soon as I have a conversation and it takes 20 seconds with any average normal person, these are drugs being given to kids which stop their bodies from developing, stops them from going into puberty because the kids believe they're the opposite sex.
Most people, their jaws hit the floor. They can't believe it's happening. And then you get into the other stuff, the cross sex hormones and the surgeries. And a lot for a long time, people didn't believe it was happening because it sounds so extreme. And I don't blame them for not believing me.
But we have all the evidence in the world now to support it. And there's been a mass awakening. So with the kids, the younger generation is changing. I think with the millennials and the early Gen z, a lot more of them were supporting this. But this latest batch coming out of high school, they're not okay with it, and there's a pushback happening.
And so perhaps the next generation of rebellious youth will fix this on their own.
Speaker 1: There's been a suggestion that women in in general are are liable to be, to being more compliant, partly through empathy, partly if you look at their biological evolutionary biology or just the history of women whenever they went against a a mass delusion or a a narrative that was mainstream, they were killed and, you know, told they were witches or whatever it was. And if you have enough generations of that, whenever a woman stands up and says, no. I don't think this is right, they're thrown off a off a cliff or something. You can see how culturally or maybe biologically over the years, they they've now been sort of almost trained and made to not speak out as much. That's one of that's a theory I'm going with.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Women are naturally more nurturing and more empathetic and have more compassion. And so And then more
Speaker 1: to lose, more to lose by speaking out. I mean, JK Rowling compared to maybe Ricky Gervais, what what JK gets in terms of abuse.
Speaker 0: Yeah. For sure. And also, this is a craze primarily affecting girls. So gender dysphoria used to impact boys 2 to 1 versus girls. But we're talking 1 out of 30,000 maybe in the population.
Today, the kids showing up to gender clinics, it's 3 to 1 girls versus boys. We've seen a several 1000 percent increase over the last 10, 15 years of kids who now identify as trans because this is a social contagion. And when you put an idea in a child's mind, they then start to ruminate on it and someone will obsess over it and some will see this is the pathway forward, this is the solution to all their problems. And then their friends will also hear about it and some of them will also fall for this and this is just the latest social contagion which also historically social contagions primarily affect girls. So this is a suicidal empathy in a way and again this ideology is pushed with lies and deception And what these young people are learning in university and from all the trans activists, there are really only 2 arguments they ever have.
The number one argument always used is that kids are going to kill themselves if we don't transition them. What a coercive Mhmm. Manipulative, evil thing to say to a child and to their parents. They'll be at the gender clinic at a children's hospital and several parents will tell you that they were told they could have a dead daughter or a live son. How else do you justify mutilating children and sterilizing kids?
Well there's only one way to justify that. You say they're gonna die and so that what that's what they've done and there's no evidence to support it. We now have evidence of course, telling the exact opposite, which we always knew. But Finland released a study earlier this year where they looked at I think it was 27 years worth of data from 1990 to 2017, something like that. More than 2,000 kids had gone to the gender clinic in Finland, and they compared it to a control group of 17,000.
And the student rates were identical. And I think it was only 6 kids at the gender clinic over those 27 years had committed suicide. And it wasn't because of gender. It was because of other mental health problems. And it was about 17 kids in the control group.
Kids without gender issues. So the actual rate of suicide was still very low. On an annualized basis, I think it was 0.05%. But there's no epidemic of And then we know from England as well, from the Tavistock that that wasn't happening. Because in December 2020, the high court ruled that children cannot give informed consent to puberty blockers.
Exactly what Masai says. And they stopped giving these kids these drugs. And then there was an appeal which they lost, not because the high court was wrong, but primarily because the court shouldn't be telling the medical profession how to do their job, which I agree with. And ideally, politicians shouldn't be telling them either. The Academy of Medicine should be able to do this on their own.
But there were many kids on the waiting list. When the Tavistock shut down, there were 15,000 kids on the waiting list, many of them for years. And they looked at the actual suicide rate, and it was incredibly low because fortunately, students with kids are still very low. There's no epidemic, but that's what transactivists use to course people. And the other thing they'll say is that puberty blockers are reversible.
Time is not reversible. If a child goes on puberty blockers for 3 months and comes off, yes, puberty will resume. Sure. There will still be a little bit of damage done in there, and we don't know what that damage is because there's never been a clinical trial. The evidence for this is shockingly low as the CAS review revealed.
It's non existent, but they'll say that puberty blockers are reversible, that it buys time for the child to explore their gender identity. Because apparently, it would be too traumatic for a girl to start developing her secondary sex characteristics, For her breasts to develop, for her hips to get wider. It would be too traumatic for a boy to get broader shoulders and a deeper voice and a hairy face. So the idea behind puberty blockers is keep these kids looking neutral so that they can pass better as the opposite sex when they're older. But there was never any data to support this.
And in fact, in reality, when you look at these kids who go down this path, 98% of them stay on the puberty blockers and they progress to the cross sex hormones. Because that whole thing about buying them time to explore their gender identity, that's a sales pitch. It's all it is. In reality, these kids have bought in to this idea that they were born wrong, that they need to become the opposite sex, and the only way they do that is through puberty blockers and the opposite sex hormones, which together are sterilizing kids causing irreversible harm. And for these 18 year old boys who were on puberty blockers the whole time, they've now got a micropenis for life.
So if puberty blockers are reversible, how come that never gets fixed?
Speaker 1: Is that right? Is that we do we know that a 100% then? So 100%. Because why does that if the idea is and obviously, I don't know I don't know anything about science. The idea is this is blocking the puberty, then you sort of hit resume, then the puberty should happen and the penis should grow.
Speaker 0: Yes. But our bodies go through stages and puberty ends around 16, 17, 18.
Speaker 1: You Okay. So it doesn't just start later.
Speaker 0: It doesn't start later.
Speaker 1: So if you miss if you do the puberty blockers till you're 18, you never resume.
Speaker 0: That window's gone.
Speaker 1: Oh, it's I didn't understand that. Yeah. I I just thought, okay. You'll go through it at 20 when instead of at 12.
Speaker 0: Nope. That window's gone. It's over. So all these boys end up with a micropenis for life. So this is why when these boys go on to get surgeries so, you know, the whole argument, first of all, doesn't work for girls.
Because girls when they go on testosterone when they're 18 or 19, they all tend to pass as males. They look like really small men because they get a beard and they get a deep voice. And with your mind, psychologically, when you see someone with a beard, you just think male. Yeah. But of course, the men have a harder time passing.
Yeah. Because they got deeper voices and they're big and you know? So the whole argument doesn't really make as much sense for girls even though the argument is shite to begin with. It doesn't make as much sense for girls. But for the boys, they've got this micropenis.
They have this penis the same size as when they were 11 or 12. And now they want to create a vagina. So in these vaginoplasties or these penile inversion surgeries they're called, they will castrate the boy. They will invert the penis. But because there's not enough tissue, they can't get the depth that they like.
So they will cut out some of the boy's colon
Speaker 1: Oh my god.
Speaker 0: Or some of his peritoneum, which is the lining of your abdominal cavity. Mhmm. And they use that to line the inside of this neovagina. And of course, there are many surgical complications. I won't get into it all.
Some of these young men have died after this surgery. They've developed necrotizing fasciitis and they can't stop the spread and they've died. 1 of the boys in one of the most early trials, One of the most not a trial but one of the earliest studies that was done. It wasn't a proper clinical trial with a control group or anything. But one of the boys died and they still labeled the study a success.
With normal pharmaceutical studies for example with 15,000 participants, if there are 5 deaths, they're gonna be looking further into this. But for some reason with this industry, they don't care about facts, they don't care about science. This is all ideology. Ideology has hijacked the medical field.
Speaker 1: Gosh. What about the I mean, the rebuttal would be there are quite a few people or or a lot of people who have had these horrible sounding surgeries who appear to be living quite happily.
Speaker 0: So I hear this all the time. Mhmm. I'll give you a real life example. I went to Florida State University to have conversations on campus with Chloe Cole. Chloe Cole is a young woman who was harmed.
She went on puberty blockers and and testosterone at the age of 12 or 13. She had a double mastectomy at 15. She regretted it less than a year later. She's been speaking out all across the US helping to get legislation passed, etcetera. But I was there having conversations with her, and this young trans identified woman, I think, sometimes it's hard to tell, she came up to talk to me literally shaking.
Literally. This happens all the time. People get these adrenaline dumps and they're shaking. Angry. We spoke for 5, 10 minutes.
Towards the end, she started to cry, but she will swear up and down that she's the happiest she's ever been. Words do not reflect reality when you see these people in real life. They can say they're happier. They'll all tell you, by the way, that if I didn't have puberty blockers, I would have killed myself.
Speaker 1: But the stats don't show that.
Speaker 0: Yet the data does not support that. So what people say and what is reflected in reality are 2 different things.
Speaker 1: We talked about cults. A lot of the indoctrination of children, of course, that's quite culty, and it makes me think it makes you think of Maoist, communism or whatever. You know, that was always the kids, and the kids would have to, go against their parents. There'd be a struggle session, stuff like that. With the the that stuff, with your own kids, have you experienced schools trying to pass pass that stuff onto them?
Speaker 0: So no. So I made a big stink when I started this campaign at my kids' elementary school. I spoke with the principal for 45 minutes right in the beginning of my campaign in the parking lot. Mhmm. He'd heard that I'd started this campaign, and he was a problem.
He was a problem. So I told him when I was speaking, I said I've embarked on this campaign and I might write about our conversation today, just so you know, on social media. And he was a problem. So What did he say? Oh my gosh.
He so I had gotten into this conversation in our local communities Facebook group where I'd posted some of the materials that were part of the school curriculum, part of the school lesson plans. For example, kindergarteners, they might be asked to fill out a little card which says, hi. My name is Sheila. Please call me they. And their job is to go around the classroom of kindergarteners introducing themselves with these alternate pronouns.
These children were in diapers 2 years ago.
Speaker 1: They
Speaker 0: should not be practicing pronouns. This is insane. And of course, if you indoctrinate children, that's the best way to change the culture. And that's what's happening. And I knew the moment they put this in schools, we had a problem.
And my light bulb went off in my head and I knew I had to do something about this. But I posted some of these lesson plans in our local communities Facebook group with thousands of people. Right away, all these activists showed up, including a human rights lawyer. I don't even think she lives in the community. I think she's in all these different groups to silence people.
Speaker 1: But
Speaker 0: I said, I'm gonna go around the community, and and I'm gonna drop off some of these actual lesson plans door to door so the parents can know what's going on in their schools. The principal of my kids' school said if I did that I would make the community feel unsafe. I said let me get this straight. If I just drop off the lesson plans produced by the government with no commentary, I'm gonna make people feel unsafe. Do you hear yourself right now?
And he anyway, he was a problem. And so I went home and I looked up in Canada and US, we have school boards. Each city has their own school board. 7, 8, 9 members who help determine policy and things like that. And I looked up all the school trustees in all these cities near me representing millions of people.
I then looked up which ones had Twitter accounts, and I wrote this thread all night long about all the abuses happening to kids. And in each part of this thread, I tagged different school board members, their Twitter accounts. So when they woke up in the morning, they all had 5, 600 notifications. Well, the school district reached out to me to have a meeting. I met with them, and I kid you not, the woman responsible for Safe Schools in Surrey, British Columbia, she teared up about 3 times during this meeting because she agreed with me.
Wow. And the the other gentleman, I could also tell he agreed with me. They can't say that, but I can tell talking to them. We had this hour long meeting. We both recorded it, And they said, look, Chris.
There's nothing we can do. You have to talk to the minister of education because this all comes from the top down. And there's pretty much nothing they can do. So anyway, the school learned that I'm probably not someone they wanna mess with, to be honest with you. Mhmm.
And so I've essentially gotten to pick my kids' school teachers in elementary school. So I not all teachers are pushing this, of course. And my kids' teachers have been great. So I haven't had a problem. And I've had these conversations with my kids at age appropriate levels over the years.
They fully understand what's going on. My eldest, she's 14 now. She's in grade 10. She was showing all her friends at high school my speech at the UN the other day. Yeah.
And she's been a positive influence for these other kids because in grade 7, her teacher did spend one day talking about the gender unicorn a little bit.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 0: And my daughter spoke up and said, it seems to me this is all about stereotypes. If a girl wants to have short hair, what's wrong with that? She's still a girl. And whereas the kids had all been quiet because they know instinctively this is wrong these teachings. As soon as she spoke up it breathed courage into these other kids who then said yeah that's right.
And I know another boy in grade 7 in that same school different teacher one of these activist teachers pushing this 3 boys in that grade 7 class made their teacher cry because the boys said that boys have no business playing in girls sports, and they wouldn't back down on their opinion. And they made this activist teacher cry. How pathetic is
Speaker 1: that? What's so frustrating is that I'm sure those teachers would have read about the struggle sessions and, Mao and, the Bolsheviks and all of these kinds of things, and that they can't see that they're they're they're they're doing exactly what they may have read about.
Speaker 0: Yeah. That's right. There's there are a ton of parallels between this and cults and communism as well. A lot of the people pushing gender ideology will straight up tell you that they're communists. I've had counter protests.
Normally, I'm just out there to have conversation. I don't really consider myself a protester. My signs are just a means of stimulating conversation. But I have held some protests. I've had a whole lot of crazy things happen, including getting my arm broken and 35 assaults and being arrested twice after being assaulted.
But I had a counter protest of a few hundred people in Toronto, Canada, and they were literally holding up signs with Lenin's picture on them or Karl Marx's picture on them because they're just straight up communists. And before that protest I held in Toronto, the Labour Congress of Canada representing a 100 different Labour Unions all got together on a Zoom call that was leaked out, all talking about what are they gonna do to derail this protest and these other protests that I'd inspired across Canada. What were all these union members going to do? We're talking about the Electrical Workers Union, the Steel Workers Union. All these unions representing men, a 100% of whom support me.
But the union heads are all communists and they're the ones pushing this. All these far left people.
Speaker 1: Is there any kind of trans person that you you would accept? Is is there is there any kind of trans you might have a space to believe in?
Speaker 0: No. There's no such thing as being transgender. That's just a label. There are people with distress about their sex, and we need to help them. But transgender is just a label.
It's it's curious that they changed the term transsexual to transgender. Much softer, more accepting term. No one wants a transsexual child. Mhmm. But transgender
Speaker 1: It's
Speaker 0: quite hip. It's hip. Mhmm. But it's the same thing. But those are just labels.
So my labels for these kids are the traditional ones. They're called boys and girls, and they're beautiful just as they are. Venito.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And if they if they wanna be gay or anything?
Speaker 0: If kids are so I don't call kids gay or straight or anything. I don't When
Speaker 1: they grow
Speaker 0: up? If they're gay when they grow up, they're gay. You can define what gay means. It's same sex attracted. You can put a gay man in an MRI machine and show him gay porn, and and the parts of his brain associated with sexual arousal will light up.
And they won't for straight porn. This is all measurable and definable. Nobody can define what transgender means. No one can define what gender means. Everyone has a different definition.
They can't tell you what a gender identity is. This whole thing is made up. There are 2 sexes, there are 0 genders and when there's 0 genders no one can be transgender. And you know what's curious about this? I'll have this conversation on the street and I'll tell these people who identify as trans that gender doesn't exist, and many of them agree with me.
And I'll say then, so if gender doesn't exist, how can you be transgender? What are you trans of? They have no answer. Because, again, this is just a cult that doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 1: Do you, do you find yourself convincing minds on the street?
Speaker 0: Yeah. All the time. Of course. I mean, truth is convincing. Now in order to be convinced of something, you have to be open to having a conversation.
And again, like with cults, if you're in a cult, someone's in a cult, they're not open to the truth. They will self please their own thoughts. They put up a wall
Speaker 1: Mhmm.
Speaker 0: And you cannot penetrate that wall. But what you can do is you can say things they agree with. Again these are the strategies and you can ask them questions because you got to get them thinking. The only reason people ever come out of a cult is because they started questioning it themselves. And to be honest with you all of them already have these thoughts in the back of their head.
They just don't allow themselves to explore them.
Speaker 1: But
Speaker 0: when you plant those seeds of doubt, if you can just plant doubt about one thing they'll then question well what else did I believe in that's not right? So for example the third thing a lot of these activists will bring up is well what about intersex people they say. Well what about them? This has nothing to do with gender ideology. Intersex is an umbrella term for a variety of disorders of sexual development.
So for example, if someone's gonna say well what about intersex people? These are a third sex or there's more than 2 sexes or whatever. Give me an example. Which one of these intersex disorders is a third sex? So let's talk about persistent Malarian duct syndrome.
This is something Eric Weinstein brought up. Was that on your podcast?
Speaker 1: No.
Speaker 0: Okay. And It might have been trigonometry. I can't remember, but I got into this a little bit with him on X. And persistent malaria duct syndrome is a condition where these fetuses, the little developing boys don't produce a hormone called anti Mullerian hormone. And when we first start developing we all, as males, start developing fallopian tubes in a uterus.
But then this anti malarial hormone causes it to dissolve and gets absorbed by the body and then our male gonads form. And we're just healthy males without any disorders. But with these boys, that hormone isn't produced and these males are born with a useless uterus and fallopian tubes. But they have testicles, they're gonna produce testosterone Mhmm. Sperm, they're fully male.
Speaker 1: Perhaps like Imam Kalief, the, the boxer.
Speaker 0: Yes. So we don't know what condition he has, if any. There's about 3 or 4 different things it could be, but in every instance, he's 100% male. Yeah. And people with these disorders hate being brought into this discussion.
There are people with XXY chromosomes, for example. Mhmm. They are it's called Klinefelter syndrome. They're all fully male. Another condition with a single X chromosome.
They're all fully female. And we treat them according to their sex because a lot of them need hormonal treatment, for example, and they need to be treated with estrogen or they need to be treated with testosterone or else they'll have other problems. So it's just a myth that these people aren't male or female. Every single per person ever born is 1 or the other.
Speaker 1: I I think it's it's also a bit of a red herring because even if they were there were a third sex. It's like, yeah. But you're you're not that. Like, to the to you know, you're you're a man or a woman. And if you are one of the 1 in a million who who has this 3rd sex, which which is hypothetical Right.
Then then you're that.
Speaker 0: A 100%. But they use this to sidetrack the conversation. But my point there, what I was trying to get to, and I forgot what I was gonna say, is if you introduce one of these conditions like persistent Larry and Dox syndrome and explain that this person person's fully male you can Google it and right away it'll say yes they're male. Right away you put doubt in that person's mind. Oh, I thought these people were a different sex.
Mhmm. Now this one is male. It's indisputable. What else am I believing that's wrong?
Speaker 1: Sometimes you come up against just a blockage, though. I mean, I I had this conversation. I was at, a festival speaking somewhere last week in London, and there was a French woman at dinner afterwards who said she she was a philosophy teacher at the Sorbonne, which is obviously very prestigious. So I thought, well, this is interesting. And I think she brought it up.
I don't think it was me obsessing her, you know, but maybe I did. I don't know. And we talked about, Iman Khalif. And I said, well, you know, this this is a man. I had I had a, you know and she she was she was saying, no.
No. No. No. That is not true. This is not she is a woman.
She's a beautiful woman and all of this stuff. And I thought, you're a philosophy. So I said, well, why do you think that? Because and she said, why do you think it, and I said, well, you know, because because I had a developmental biologist from the University of Manchester on the show, doctor Emma Hilton, who spent an hour explaining to me every single part of why this person is a man. And I really pushed just, you know, to do devil's advocate.
And it's just no there's no doubt here that this is a man who was beating up women. I know people don't wanna believe that.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: And I I said, so and what about you? And she said, no. Because I'm French and this this happened in France, and so I know all about I know about it. And I said, but that's not evidence. You being French doesn't doesn't make Iman Caliph any less of a man.
And she I thought this was insane that this was a an established prestigious philosopher from the Sorbonne who still had nothing. I wanted more. You know? I I knew you must have that feeling sometimes. You want a better argument.
You want, like, something. Absolutely. There has to be something.
Speaker 0: People say to me sometimes, Chris, what's the most intelligent intellectual argument you've ever had for transition kids? Well, there isn't one. There's never been one. I would love it, to be honest with you. Please show me how I'm wrong.
Yeah. I'd love I love being wrong. Some people don't like being wrong. I love it. And a mature individual should love to be wrong because that's how we learn.
And you shouldn't have that pride. You should be able to humble yourself and admit, yes, I was wrong about this. And that's how you learn. Or if you don't know something, just admit you don't know. But, yes, some people absolutely have those blockages and some people just can't be reached.
Speaker 1: You know what was sad? And I'm sure you've experienced this as well. She she started reaching for, you know, oh, you can't just say, you just say he's a man because you find different kinds of things disgusting or what? She wanted to portray me as, like, a bigger who doesn't like differences, and she couldn't have been further. Well, I I, you know, I I embrace anything.
Be different. Do your thing. It it be and I thought, what a low blow that she had to resort to that because she didn't have logic.
Speaker 0: Yeah. That's the sign of an immature individual, isn't it?
Speaker 1: I should teach her the Sawbon.
Speaker 0: Yeah. You you should. But I think even COVID showed us how broken so many people are and how easily manipulated that they are. The human mind is very easily manipulated.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: And it doesn't matter how smart someone is. We're all prone to being harmed by propaganda. And in her case, I mean, I'm not surprised. She's probably a leftist. She's female.
This preys on her natural compassion and all that. And also, if she were to speak out against this, she's gonna lose all of her social status.
Speaker 1: So she's incentivized to just stick with that belief she has.
Speaker 0: Yeah. She'll lose all her friends.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. What about I mean, I saw a Peter Bogosian video with you, and you you ended up calling a guy disgusting. Do you remember? There was a guy he he said he didn't
Speaker 0: want to lose. Disgusting. What he was saying was disgusting. I think
Speaker 1: you called him disgusting. I don't call people disgusting. I think you said I think you're disgusting. Well You were really angry.
Speaker 0: Maybe we can I wasn't angry? I remember this. I wasn't angry.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 0: This was at Speaker's Corner in London. Okay. And he was talking about why men should be able to compete against women.
Speaker 1: Yeah. You were doing the street epistemology thing on the floor.
Speaker 0: That's right. Yeah. And I mean, I'd I'd have to review the clip, but it's absolutely disgusting to be saying that big strong men should be competing against women and hurting women and taking their spots away. So, yeah, that's disgusting. Is he being disgusting in that moment?
Absolutely. It's disgusting to maintain that view.
Speaker 1: Was it awkward afterwards? No. Not at all. I've got one more question for you, but first Yeah. Where can people follow you and, see your work?
Speaker 0: Most of almost all of my work is on x at billboard Chris, Instagram as well. And in the future, I will get the other platforms going. I do have YouTube channel and Rumble and TikTok. I need to get going. I won't last long.
Speaker 1: Don't bother with TikTok. So you it's just a mess there.
Speaker 0: But, yeah, x in Instagram. And I have a website, billboardchris.com. And if people wanna support me, that'd be great because I do all this at my own expense traveling around the world.
Speaker 1: Who's a heretic you admire? Oh, boy. You were supposed to be asked that before so you could think about it.
Speaker 0: Well, I'm going to go with the OG on this one, JK Rowling. Mhmm. I don't agree with her on everything political, but she is the most high profile person in the world who took this on when nobody else would. So huge respect for that.
Speaker 1: She's the OG. Yeah. Well, people please go follow Billboard Chris. He's given up his time. He's been great.
You got we'll put the links in the description. Please do go follow him. Hit the like on this video and keep watching this very similar themed video that you might like.
@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸
If you wish to support my efforts to end this madness, one conversation at a time, I really appreciate your help. It’s time to step on the accelerator heading into 2025. billboardchris.com/donate
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
This is the Director of the Trans Health Clinic at @CincyChildrens. She treats patients as young as four. She’s transing 4-year-olds https://t.co/foDhB0Khrd
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
BREAKING: @CincyChildrens removed this doctor’s page from their website. Here’s the archived link showing they treat 4-year-olds in the Trans Clinic for when they try to deny it: https://web.archive.org/web/20241121193924/https://www.cincinnatichildrens.org/bio/c/leeann-conard
Lee Ann E. Conard, RPh, DO, MPH
Lee Ann E. Conard, RPh, DO, MPH, is a faculty member of the Division of Adolescent and Transition Medicine at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center within the UC Department of Pediatrics.
web.archive.org
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
This is the Director of the Trans Health Clinic at @CincyChildrens. She treats patients as young as four. She’s transing 4-year-olds https://t.co/foDhB0Khrd
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
How did something so harmful to children get approved?
@SwipeWright - Colin Wright
It's hard to convey how unregulated and extreme "gender medicine" is compared to literally all other medical practices. Consider these two recent cases from different medical fields: 1. Two days ago, a popular YouTube podiatrist known as The Toe Bro had his license suspended for five months for failing to detect toe cancer in a patient that resulted in the patient needing to have the toe amputated. 2. Today, top youth gender doctor, Johanna Olson-Kennedy, faces a lawsuit by a patient who was prescribed puberty blockers at age 12 after just one consultation and without prior therapy. Olson-Kennedy is accused of pressuring the patient’s parents to consent to the treatment by citing the widely debunked "suicide myth"—that their daughter would likely commit suicide without it. She also authorized cross-sex hormones for the patient at age 13 and wrote a letter of support for the patient's double mastectomy at age 14 that lied about the duration of the patient's transgender identity. This isn't the first patient Olson-Kennedy has rushed to transition. She has a reputation for advocating the removal of medical safeguards for youth distressed about their sex. Despite this, she and many other gender doctors, known for similar extreme practices, continue to practice experimental "gender-affirming care" without convincing evidence of benefit and amid a host of known harms. The Toe Bro made a genuine mistake that resulted in a cancerous toe being amputated, and his license gets suspended for 5 months. Meanwhile, gender doctors like Olson-Kennedy regularly bypass medical safeguards to amputate healthy body parts without sound medical reasons and face no consequences. How does any of this make sense?
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
Mental health counselor who’s a man pretending to be a woman, boasts about transing kids as he speaks against Montana SB 164 which would criminalize s*x change surgery and cross-s*x hormones for minors This is how desperate they are to mutilate your kids. https://t.co/DZhobOdKON
Video Transcript AI Summary
A therapist's client, a young teen entering puberty, understands that their gender does not align with their sex assigned at birth and wants to explore hormones or blockers. The supportive parents scheduled an endocrinologist appointment. The physician informed the parents that if SB 164 were to pass, providing gender-affirming care could lead to the doctor and parents being arrested and imprisoned. The client was devastated by the prospect of their care leading to the loss of their parents.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This client of mine is in their early teens just entering puberty, and they have a clear understanding that their gender does not align with their sex assigned at birth. In therapy with me, they expressed their desire to explore options for starting hormones or blockers before their puberty advances further. One minute. So with my guidance, their parents who are loving and fully supportive recently scheduled an appointment with an endocrinologist to discuss an assessment and possible treatment options. During that appointment, my client was subjected to a truly traumatizing experience listening as the physician informed their parents that if SB 164 were to pass, proceeding with any gender affirming care for my client could lead to both the doctor and their parents being arrested and imprisoned.
My client was devastated. Imagine your own child being placed in this situation, told that the price of their own care and well-being is the loss of their parents. Would you stand for it? Can you vote for a bill which causes such harm?
@DerrickEvans4WV - Derrick Evans
Speaker Mike Johnson reads direct quotes from a gender transition surgeon who operates on minors. “We’re just kind of learning and figuring out what works— We'll know more in 5 to 10 years, it'll be fascinating to see how all these kids turn out” https://t.co/NbMeeozqwE
Video Transcript AI Summary
A politician introduces a video clip of a surgeon who identifies as the "queer surgeon" and performs gender affirming surgeries. The politician expresses concern over experimental and irreversible procedures being performed on children.
In the clip, the surgeon states that 80% of their practice is gender affirming surgery, with a focus on genital surgeries like vaginoplasty and phalloplasty. They acknowledge an increase in adolescents seeking surgical intervention, which presents unique challenges, especially for those who have undergone puberty suppression. The surgeon admits that there is a lack of published research on genital surgeries for pubertally suppressed adolescents and that they are "just kind of learning and figuring out what works." They explain that puberty suppression affects the amount of tissue available for vaginoplasty, requiring alternative techniques like using peritoneum to line the vaginal canal. The surgeon notes that they will know more about the outcomes in 5-10 years and that it will be fascinating to see how these kids turn out.
The politician then condemns these procedures as "barbarism" and "mutilation of children" that should be illegal. They claim that children lack the capacity to make such life-altering decisions and that sex is an immutable characteristic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He calls himself the queer surgeon, and he boasts about the shocking, fully experimental, irreversible, and life altering invasive procedures that he and others are performing on children to surgically modify their genitals. I want everyone to hear this in his own words, not mine, and take special note of the frank admission that no one has published any studies on these shocking procedures, and they are, quote, as he says, just kind of learning and figuring out what works, unquote. Later in this video, he admits to performing, quote, huge reconstructive surgery rearranging anatomy, and then acknowledges that they know almost nothing about the outcomes for these children. And quote, he says, we'll know more in five to ten years. And quote, it'll be fascinating to see how all these kids turn out.
Wow. With unanimous consent, I will enter the link to this full video in the record of our hearing because everyone should watch it. It is absolutely nightmarish and surreal to hear the description of what these people are doing to the bodies of young children. Please play that clip, and I will say viewer discretion is advised.
Speaker 1: So 80% or so of my practice is gender affirming surgery. So I do facial, chest surgery, and genital surgery. But the majority of my practice, instead of where my passion lies, is really genital surgery cases. So I do a lot of vaginoplasty and a lot of phalloplasty. I would just say they're expanding in either direction.
So, yeah, a lot of adolescents presenting for surgical intervention but also a lot of people that are, like, in their seventies sometimes coming in for genital surgery and then everything in between. But the adolescents for sure present some unique challenges. Obviously, there's great evidence supporting pubertal suppression for a whole variety of benefits, but the one thing that is very new is genital surgery in someone that has underwent pubertal suppression. Not so much an issue in someone with assigned female at birth anatomy that undergoes a phalloplasty because we're creating something with, you know, free tissue transfer or flap anyway, but a much bigger issue for an individual that's undergoing a penile inversion vaginoplasty because we use all of that tissue to basically create vulva as well as line the internal vaginal canal. And as a specialty, those of us that do a fairly high volume of genital gender affirming surgery, you know, we've maybe done a couple, a handful of pubertally suppressed adolescents as a field and no one's published on it yet.
OHSU is, we're just putting our first series together as we're kind of learning and figuring out what works, But it's really changing things because you don't have enough tissue to line the vaginal canal, so you either have to take a skin graft or take skin from elsewhere or use some artificial products. The way that we're dealing with it is by using a robot and we're basically performing intra abdominal components of the surgery. So we're using peritoneum, which is the inner lining of the abdomen to line most of the vaginal canal And by doing that, that allows us to use all of the remaining tissue externally to create a vulva and try to make also an aesthetic results.
Speaker 0: So I'm gonna speak the truth here plainly, and I think the vast majority of the American people understand and agree with what I'm going to say. What you've just heard there is a little sample of barbarism. This is the mutilation of children, and it should be prohibited by our law. This so called gender affirming care is anything but affirming and caring, and the language matters. This is adults deciding to permanently alter the bodies of children who do not have the capacity to make like life altering decisions on their own.
And here's some more plain truth that everybody acknowledged until about fifteen minutes ago. It's been plainly observed and fully respected by every culture for all of recorded history. Sex isn't something you are
reSee.it AI Summary
Joe Rogan recently discussed "gender-affirming care," labeling it as a form of child sacrifice driven by profit. He criticized the financial motives behind the industry, highlighting how organizations like the Human Rights Campaign score hospitals based on their services, with pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer benefiting significantly. Rogan argued that transitioning does not reduce suicide risk, but rather increases it, and he expressed concern over how easily children can be manipulated into making irreversible decisions. This, he believes, constitutes exploitation rather than compassion.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
🚨 “This Is Child Sacrifice” Joe Rogan just exposed “gender-affirming care” for the crime it truly is. And he didn’t hold back: calling those profiting from it exactly what they are—evil. If you’re tired of being gaslit into thinking this is “saving kids,” read this thread. 🧵 https://t.co/qW2tn46oDt
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
📍 Before we get started, take a moment to bookmark this point. Rogan spoke some powerful truths here, and nothing is going to change until more eyes are opened.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Fitness icon Jillian Michaels just sat down with Joe Rogan for a raw, hard-hitting 3-hour conversation. And while they tackled a wide range of topics—including COVID—no moment struck deeper than when the subject of child mutilation came up. Rogan predicted that “gender-affirming care” will soon go the way of lobotomies. “We performed lobotomies for, I think, roughly 50 or 60 years,” Rogan said. “I think they stopped in 1967—that’s when they did the last one. And then they realized, like, oh my God, this is a terrible thing to do. But they did it for so fucking long.” He added that transitioning doesn’t reduce the risk of suicide—it actually makes things worse. “The data goes the other way,” he said. “They’re 25% more likely to commit suicide. Suicidal ideation, depression, anxiety. All those things ramp up once they’ve transitioned.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Children's bodies are not properly developed, but people argue that denying transition will lead to suicide. Data indicates the opposite: transitioning correlates with increased suicide rates, suicidal ideation, depression, and anxiety. Individuals may regret transitioning, feeling manipulated and exploited.
The speaker criticizes the use of "puberty blockers" and "gender affirming care" for minors, comparing it to barbaric practices like lobotomies. Children go through phases, and boys who want to transition may simply be gay. Some gay individuals feel that the concept of transition erases gay identity by implying they are in the wrong gender.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's terrible for them. Yeah. Their freaking children, their body is not developed properly. Nobody understands that. They don't when they
Speaker 1: make that argument, they're told the parting line of if you make them go through this, they'll kill themselves. And it turns out that the data doesn't bear out to prove that either. But they have
Speaker 2: with that. It goes the other way. It The data goes the other way. It goes the way. Percent more likely to commit suicide, suicidal ideation, depression, anxiety.
All those things ramp up once they've transitioned because they realize, like, they're they've made a horrible mistake, they've been influenced by these crazy people. They wanna use them as, like, virtue flags. They wanna use children as virtue flags. It's fucking insane. They also shouldn't be allowed to call them a different thing than when they call them they call them chemical castration drugs for sex offenders, but yet they call them puberty blockers.
Speaker 0: And gender affirming care.
Speaker 2: Gender affirming care.
Speaker 0: Isn't that lovely?
Speaker 2: Yeah. It's it's fucking barbaric and bananas, and we're gonna look back at it the same way we looked at lobotomies. You know, we performed lobotomies for, I think, roughly around fifty or sixty years for I think they stopped it in 1967. I think that's when they stopped the last lobotomies, and then they realized, like, oh my god. This is a terrible thing to do, but they did it for so fucking long.
And this is the same thing that's gonna happen with this this whole gender affirming care thing for for minors. It's crazy. Kids don't know what's going on. You have children. You know what it's like.
Speaker 0: Oh,
Speaker 2: yeah. They go through phases and cycles. They become tomboys, and boys play with dolls. Like, who cares? A lot by the way, a lot of those boys that wanna transition, it turns out they're just gay.
And if you just leave them and let them be gay and a lot of my gay friends fucking hate it because they're like, you're trying to erase gay people. You're trying to say that all these gay people are really in the wrong gender.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Michaels then dropped a bombshell about one of the key funders of this “multi-billion-dollar” child mutilation scheme. She said the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) now scores hospitals based on how much “gender-affirming care” they provide, and a low score can hurt their chances of getting grant money. “When you look at who funds it—Pfizer,” she said. And surprise, surprise: Pfizer has a direct financial stake in the gender medicine industry. The pharmaceutical giant doesn’t just fund the Human Rights Campaign’s hospital scoring system. They also manufacture key drugs used in hormone replacement therapy. In other words, the same company helping pressure hospitals into offering these treatments is cashing in when they do. Michaels added that just one puberty block, Lupron, brings in nearly a billion dollars a year. While it’s not made by Pfizer, it highlights the absurd profits this industry rakes in by cashing in on kids’ confusion. “That’s where it’s evil,” Rogan said.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes the financial aspect of gender-affirming care is a "big problem" and "evil" due to its multibillion-dollar scale. They recall someone who supported the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) and its previous advocacy for gay marriage. The HRC now reportedly rates medical institutions on their gender-affirming care, impacting potential grant money. The speaker believes this information is available on the HRC website. They mention Pfizer as a funder and suggest Lupron is a near-billion-dollar-a-year drug, potentially used off-label.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have seen the financial component, though. Oh, that's a big problem. Multibillion dollar business. That's where it's evil. And when you look at who's funding this stuff, yeah, I remember my gut.
He used to go to the frigging human rights campaign dinners and donate, you know, when you're fighting for gay marriage and good good liberal. And now when you go to their page, if, they've got a score, and forgive me. I can't remember the frigging name of it, but there's a score where they rate different medical institutions on how they provide gender affirming care. And if they get a bad score, it impacts, I think, how many how much grant money they can get. Mhmm.
There's a page for this. I believe it's through the HRC on their website. And when you look at who funds it, like, Pfizer. Like, oh, that's not at all surprising. I one drug, I think Lupron is almost a billion dollar a year business.
Boy. Off label. I I I forgive me. It's been a minute since I've looked into this, but I'm I'm in the zone for sure.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Then came the rant that hit hardest, where Rogan called “gender-affirming care” for what it is: child sacrifice. “I don’t necessarily believe in demons and angels… but if you were the devil, wouldn’t money be your most valuable tool to get people to do absolutely atrocious evil things that are going to ruin their lives?” he asked. “Money is like the devil’s playground. It’s like where the devil can convince good people to do things and then you use words like ‘gender affirming care’ and you can kind of like change the narrative but the end result is really just you’re profiting off of people’s confusion and you’re doing so in a way where you’re sacrificing—it’s literal child sacrifice,” Rogan declared. “Those children that wind up committing suicide because they went through this ‘gender affirming care’ and are horribly depressed and they don’t have breasts anymore and they’re so confused and they can’t have children and they just wind up killing themselves. And this is sacrifice. This is like a form of child sacrifice for financial gain,” he hammered home. “You’re not sacrificing them to the gods or to demons. You’re doing it to money. And it’s really wild that we can’t see that.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Money is the devil's tool to make people do evil. Terms like "gender affirming care" change the narrative, but the result is profiting off people's confusion.
Gender affirming care is child sacrifice. Children commit suicide because they went through this care, are depressed, don't have breasts, can't have children, and are confused. This is a form of child sacrifice for financial gain, not to gods or demons, but to money.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't necessarily believe in demons and angels. I don't believe that. But if you were the devil, like, wouldn't money be your most valuable tool to get people to do absolutely atrocious evil things that are gonna ruin their lives? Money is like the devil's playground. It's like where the devil can convince good people to do things, and then you use words like gender affirming care and, you know, you you you can you can kinda, like, change the narrative, but the end result is really just you're profiting off of people's confusion, and you're doing so in a way where you're sacrificing.
It's literal child sacrifice. Those children that wind up committing suicide because they went through this gender affirming care and are horribly depressed, and they they they don't have breasts anymore, and they're so confused, and they can't have children, and and they just wind up killing themselves, and this is sacrifice. This is like a form of child sacrifice for financial gain. I mean, you're not sacrificing them to the gods or to demons. You're doing it to money, and it's really wild that we can't see that.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Rogan drove his point home with one final, devastating blow, highlighting just how easily children can be manipulated compared to adults. He made it painfully clear: shaping vulnerable kids into believing they were “born in the wrong body” isn’t compassion. It’s indoctrination. “They get encouragement and then they get positive feedback,” Rogan said. “They show up at school wearing lipstick and everyone’s like, you’re amazing. You’re amazing now Bobby, now that you’re Roberta… You used to be some guy that got stuffed into a locker and now your girl is incredible.” That kind of praise, he warned, doesn’t empower children—it traps them. It makes them prime targets for exploitation. “This is why cults exist,” Rogan explained. “Why do they get kids to wear suicide vests?” he asked. “Because you can’t convince a 55-year-old guy to do it.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
People are influenced by those around them through encouragement and positive feedback. Someone who was once stuffed into a locker might be seen as amazing after transitioning.
People profit off of this vulnerability to influence. This vulnerability is why cults exist and why people become religious martyrs.
It's difficult to convince a 55-year-old with a job and family to wear a suicide vest. They might question the promise of 72 virgins in heaven and the sanity of the situation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And understand, like, the the complex interaction of human beings and people that around them that influence them. And, you know, that they get encouragement, and then they get positive feedback. And then they show up at school wearing lipstick, and everyone's like, you're amazing. You're amazing now, Bobby. Like, now that you're Roberta.
Like, now you're amazing. You used to be some guy that got stuffed into a locker, and now your girl is incredible. And you're you're giving them this positive feedback. You don't and it's money, and it's the people are profiting off of it. It's fucking insane, and it's so wild to watch it all play out and realize, like, we are so vulnerable to influence.
Human beings are so I mean, this is why cults exist. This is why people are willing to be religious martyrs and blow themselves up and which, by the way, like, why do they do that? Why do they get kids to wear suicide vest? Because you can't convince a 55 year old guy to do it. 55 guy with a job and a family and a lot of, you know, interests and good friends, tough to get him to wear that suicide vest.
You know? He's like, what? What am I doing? I'm going to a mall? What the fuck am no.
Why am I doing that? I'm going to heaven, and I'm gonna get 72 virgins. Can you can you show me these virgins? Like, is there a fucking what what happened to them? How do these poor virgins wind up in heaven just getting raped by this 55 year old guy who blew himself up?
Like, this is fucking insane.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
A grown person with a job, a family, and a lifetime of experience asks questions. But a confused child? You can steer them anywhere—straight into surgeries, medication, and irreversible damage. This isn’t inclusion. It’s child exploitation for profit—and it needs to stop. https://t.co/eUbWyH8qj2
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Thanks for reading. If this report resonated with you, follow me for more threads like this one. → @VigilantFox In other news, RFK Jr. just exposed the government agency behind the geoengineering scam. You’ll want to read this thread 🧵 https://t.co/ayFBBiQGeZ
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
🚨 RFK Jr. Just Named the Government Agency Behind America’s Geoengineering Nightmare For years, they told us chemtrails were just a “conspiracy theory.” Now, RFK Jr. isn’t just confirming that “crimes” are happening. He’s exposing exactly who’s behind them. 🧵 THREAD https://t.co/Ft4m3MHunn
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
NANCY PELOSI: “We are hoping that we can have gender-affirming care for our trans kids.” Openly calling for child mutilation. https://t.co/nzVupohHhW
Video Transcript AI Summary
"that is something that I'm working for at at at the national level, and we have can I say, are hoping that we can have gender affirming care for our for our trans kids? And that it's it's it's a sad thing for us." "I'm not totally I don't know what I don't know what effect we can have nationally with what we have going on in the White House and in the congress." "It's really very sad if you were there." "Outside our door, we have a trans flag." "Outside of our door in the cap in the office Congressional Office Building, we have the trans flag as do some of our other colleagues." "But that view is not necessarily"
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How is your office responding to the pauses in gender affirming care here in California?
Speaker 1: Well, that is something that I'm working for at at at the national level, and we have can I say, are hoping that we can have gender affirming care for our for our trans kids? And that it's it's it's a it's a sad thing for us. I'm not totally I don't know what I don't know what effect we can have nationally with what we have going on in the White House and in the congress. It's really very sad if you were there. Outside our door, we have a trans flag.
Outside of our door in the cap in the office Congressional Office Building, we have the trans flag as do some of our other colleagues. But that view is not necessarily
reSee.it AI Summary
Karin Selva, the medical director of the Transgender Clinic at Randall Children's Hospital in Oregon, faces criticism for promoting puberty blockers for children, which she claims are reversible. Critics highlight the lack of long-term studies on these treatments and note that the blockers are not FDA-approved. Following the backlash, the hospital reportedly removed information from its website, but critics assert they have retained evidence of the original claims.
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
Karin Selva, the medical director for the Randall Children's Hospital's Transgender Clinic in Oregon, promotes harmful puberty blockers for CHILDREN and claims that they are "reversible," despite ADMITTING there aren't any studies on long-term effects. PURE EVIL CHILD ABUSE https://t.co/y5q3rgSzDL
Video Transcript AI Summary
The ovary doesn't produce estrogen anymore and the testicle doesn't produce testosterone. Thus, the signs that we see from these hormones are blocked and don't progress in puberty. The main benefit is that they prevent the unwanted permanent effects of puberty, and thus future surgeries can be avoided as an adult. We can prevent the need for any chest reconstruction in affirm trans males or facial feminization surgery in transfemales. They are also reversible, and thus if the patient decides to stop using pubertal blockers, their endogenous puberty will resume as previous. Using pubertal blockers can alleviate the depression or worsening gender dysphoria that is often associated with progressing pubertal changes. And lastly, the use of puberty suppression is recommended by the Pediatric Endocrine Society in their clinical guidelines for the treatment of transgender and gender diverse youth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello, my name is Karen Selva. I use she and her pronouns. I'm a pediatric endocrinologist and the medical director of the Randall Children's Hospital T Clinic. This clinic provides multidisciplinary care to trans gender or gender expansive youth and their families. Today I would like to discuss the use of pubertal suppression or puberty blockers in transgender and gender expansive youth.
Puberty blockers work at the level of the pituitary gland and they actually suppress the release of the LH and the FSH so that the sex organs are no longer stimulated. The ovary doesn't produce estrogen anymore and the testicle doesn't produce testosterone. Thus, the signs that we see from these hormones are blocked and don't progress in puberty. What are the benefits of using puberty blockers? Well, the main benefit is that they prevent the unwanted permanent effects of puberty, and thus future surgeries can be avoided as an adult.
We can prevent the need for any chest reconstruction in affirm trans males or facial feminization surgery in transfemales. They are also reversible, and thus if the patient decides to stop using pubertal blockers, their endogenous puberty will resume as previous. Using pubertal blockers can alleviate the depression or worsening gender dysphoria that is often associated with progressing pubertal changes. And lastly, the use of puberty suppression is recommended by the Pediatric Endocrine Society in their clinical guidelines for the treatment of transgender and gender diverse youth. What are the potential risks of puberty blockers?
The practice of using puberty suppressors in transgender youth is new. Since the first clinical guidelines were only published in 02/2009. Thus, we don't have long term studies with long term outcomes and data yet.
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
The hospital is PROMOTING puberty blockers for "trans kids" despite admitting they are not FDA-approved. EVIL. https://t.co/kEqA4IVNzj
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
Randall Children's Hospital is PROMOTING the use of IRREVERSIBLE and HARMFUL puberty blockers on children, claiming they are safe. In the same paragraph, they admit that puberty blockers are NOT FDA-approved for use in "transgender children.” These sick, evil people are knowingly harming kids
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
UPDATE: They just scrubbed their site. Don’t worry, we have all the receipts!
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
BREAKING: Randall Children’s Hospital just quietly SCRUBBED the entire gender clinic from their website and youtube channel after we exposed them for promoting puberty blockers, tucking, and chest binding for kids They can delete all they want but I have all the receipts! They’re running scared. Good! Investigate them and pull their funding immediately @TheJusticeDept @AGPamBondi
reSee.it AI Summary
Back in 2022, the outlet I co-founded reported that men from an obscure pedophilic castration-fetish forum were influencing clinical guidelines for trans youth care. We had names and evidence, but mainstream outlets dismissed it as sensational. Now, three years later, clinicians admit they’ve castrated children under guidelines shaped by those same pedophilic voices.
@Slatzism - pagliacci the grinch 🎄🎁
back in 2022, the outlet I co-founded reported that men who belonged to an obscure forum of pedophilic castration fetishists were influencing the clinical guidelines for “trans youth” care. this was not hyperbole. we had evidence. we had names. we tried to show people. we were treated as though it was all too sensational to take seriously, and no mainstream outlet wanted to touch it. and here we are now, three years later, and clinicians are admitting they've castrated children under the authority of guidelines that were created with the input of those very pedophilic castration fetishists. wild.
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
JAIL FOR LIFE FOR EVERYONE INVOLVED IN THIS DEMONIC EVIL https://t.co/YJlkfn5STM
