reSee.it - Related Post Feed
reSee.it AI Summary
Nikola Tesla and John G. Trump, both exceptional minds in their respective fields, have a connection through the New Yorker Hotel. Tesla lived and worked there until his death, while Trump was assigned to examine Tesla's work by the U.S. government. The mysterious disappearance of some of Tesla's files raises questions about the inventions the world never saw. Additionally, the role of WikiLeaks and Julian Assange in the 2016 presidential election is speculated, with some suggesting they played a vital part in electing Donald J. Trump. The takedown of evil is believed to be planned by outstanding minds in military intelligence, with many aspects of "the plan" remaining undisclosed to the public.
@WarNuse - WarNuse
'Two New York City Hotel Rooms, Two Exceptional Minds, A White-Haired Aussie, And A Fragrance Of Musk.'
@WarNuse - WarNuse
This Is John G. Trump, Donald J. Trump’s Uncle. John G. Was An American Electrical Engineer, Inventor, Physicist, And A Professor At Massachusetts Institute Of Technology From 1936 To 1973. (August 21, 1907 - February 21, 1985)
@WarNuse - WarNuse
John G. Trump Was Noted For Developing Rotational Radiation Therapy. Together With Robert J. Van De Graaff, He Developed One Of The First Million-Volt X-Ray Generators.
@WarNuse - WarNuse
This Is Nikola Tesla, A Serbian-American Inventor, Electrical Engineer, Mechanical Engineer, And Futurist Known For His Contributions To The Design Of The Modern Alternating Current 'AC' Electricity Supply System. (July 10, 1856 - January 7, 1943)
@WarNuse - WarNuse
In 1933, At The Age Of 77, Nikola Tesla Moves Into The New Yorker Hotel, Occupying Rooms #3327 And #3328.
@WarNuse - WarNuse
In The Autumn Of 1937, Tesla Leaves The New Yorker Hotel To Make His Regular Commute To The Cathedral And Library. As He Crosses The Street He Is Hit By A Taxicab And Thrown To The Ground. The Accident Severely Damages His Back And Breaks Three Of His Ribs.
@WarNuse - WarNuse
However, Tesla Never Consults A Physician So The Full Extent Of His Injuries Are, To This Day, Unknown. Age 81 At The Time Of The Accident, Tesla Never Really Recovers. Some Even Suggest The Accident Affected His Psychology And Confidence.
@WarNuse - WarNuse
Nikola Tesla Lives And Works In The Hotel New Yorker From 1933 Until Hotel Staff Find Him Dead In His Bed On January 8th, 1943. It Is Later Established That Tesla Had Died At Approximately 10:45pm On The 7th.
@WarNuse - WarNuse
Immediately Following The Announcement Of Nikola Tesla's Death, The U.S. Government Moved Quickly To Acquire Tesla's Papers. The FBI Instructed The Office Of Alien Property To Immediately Take Possession Of All That Remained Of His Property And Possessions.
@WarNuse - WarNuse
Based On The Apparent Nature Of Tesla's Work, FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover Declares It 'Most Secret'. In The U.S. Government's View, It Is Vitally Important To Get Hold Of Tesla's Work Before Any Foreign Powers, Especially The Soviet Union, Can.
@WarNuse - WarNuse
Who Does The U.S. Government Assign To Examine Nikola Tesla's Work? John G. Trump. By Eleanor Clift, August 06, 2017 https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-good-trump-was-a-genius-and-a-gentleman
The Good Trump Was a Genius and a Gentleman
“Trump’s remarkable personality mix contributed to all of this achievement and success.”
thedailybeast.com
@WarNuse - WarNuse
Much Of Nikola Tesla's Work Is Later Released Into The Public Domain. Curiously Though, Some Of The Material Appears To Be Lost. Makes One Wonder What Brilliant Inventions The World Never Saw. 'The Disappearance Of Tesla's Files.' https://interestingengineering.com/the-mysterious-disappearance-of-nikola-teslas-files-after-his-death
The Mysterious Disappearance of Nikola Tesla's Files After His Death
Even at the time of his death Nikola Tesla, who was living alone in a hotel room, didn’t stop working. What he was working on is still shrouded in mystery.
interestingengineering.com
@WarNuse - WarNuse
This Is Julian Assange, Born Julian Paul Hawkins, An Australian Editor, Publisher, And Activist Who Founded WikiLeaks In 2006, Roughly Ten Years Before Donald J. Trump Announces His Run For The U.S. Presidency. https://t.co/q2CYQKPtra
@WarNuse - WarNuse
The Question Is... Could U.S. Military Intelligence Have Secured The Victory For Donald J. Trump In The 2016 Presidential Election Without The Immaculately Timed And Damning Drops From WikiLeaks?
@WarNuse - WarNuse
Was WikiLeaks And Julian Assange An Intricate And Vital Part Of 'That Plan' To Elect Donald J. Trump, Expose Hillary Clinton And The Cabal, And Finally Stop The Cynical Evil Power Structure That Is Plaguing Our Earth?
@WarNuse - WarNuse
WikiLeaks Was Initiated In 2006 In Iceland By The 'Sunshine Press'. Who Set Up The Sunshine Press? U.S. MI Knew The Public Needed A Source With 100% Credibility, Regardless Of What The Fake News Media Narrates, A Truthful And Verifiable Source For The Public.
@WarNuse - WarNuse
Remember When Donald J. Trump Exclaimed At A Campaign Rally In Front Of Tens Of Thousands... ”I Love Wikileaks!”. Like... Family Love, Mr. President? https://t.co/JMJdojK7mM
@WarNuse - WarNuse
This Is Elon Reeve Musk, An Engineer, Industrial Designer, Technology Entrepreneur And Philanthropist. Founder, CEO, CTO And Chief Designer Of Spacex, CEO And Product Architect Of Tesla, Inc., Founder Of The Boring Company, Co-Founder Of Neuralink, And Co-Founder Of OpenAI. https://t.co/IwiEykskfT
@WarNuse - WarNuse
On The Left Is The Ryugyong Hotel In Pyongyang, North Korea. We Believe This Never-Completed Building Was The 'Asia' Clown HQ, And Where Google's Eric Smcmit Set Up Secret Comms. Servers For Barry Soetoro And His Most Trusted Psychopaths. On The Right Is The Tesla Motors Logo. https://t.co/812YcQXtZk
@WarNuse - WarNuse
This Historic Takedown Of Evil Is Planned By The Most Outstanding Minds In Military Intelligence. We Know Aspects Of 'The Plan' Will Never Be Exposed To The Public, And That Many Gruesome Truths Will Never Be Revealed. 'Q' Told Us So.
@WarNuse - WarNuse
Are There Even Bigger Dots To Connect? Blood Relations Are What [They] Live For. Maintaining This Bloodline In Power And In As Many Aspects Of A Structured Society As Possible, Is Paramount. Simply Own It. (To Be Continued.)
@wikileaks - WikiLeaks
20 years on from the invasion of Iraq, @AJFaultLines looks at the case of Julian Assange who gave us an unprecedented insight into the war, including the infamous 'Collateral Murder' release https://collateralmurder.wikileaks.org
Video Transcript AI Summary
Julian Assange, founder of WikiLeaks, faces extradition to the US for publishing classified documents revealing truths about the Iraq and Afghan wars. He has been imprisoned in the UK for over three years without a conviction, with the US seeking a 175-year sentence under the Espionage Act. His publications, including the infamous "collateral murder" video, exposed high civilian death tolls and military misconduct. Assange's case raises significant concerns about press freedom, as it sets a dangerous precedent for journalists. His supporters argue that the government is punishing him for revealing uncomfortable truths, while Assange's health deteriorates in prison. The implications of his prosecution could drastically alter how national security journalism is conducted, limiting access to vital information for the public.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm able to see Julian once or twice a week and it changes from week to week. Some some weeks I can't see him. I have to take 2 buses and 2 trains to get there. It's quite long, and the visit is about an hour and a bit. And then we're kind of waving and blowing kisses, and it's just, it's such a bizarre thing.
Julian is in the harshest prison in the UK. He's not serving a sentence, and the US wants to put him in prison for a 175 years about publishing the truth about the Iraq and Afghan wars.
Speaker 1: We journalists are at our best when we share with activists and lawyers the goal of exposing illegality and wrong doing.
Speaker 2: It's been 13 years since the founder of WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, entered the global stage. In 2010, the Australian citizen published the largest trove of classified US documents to date, upending the government's narrative about its wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Speaker 3: It's another fact from the files that indicates that a much, much higher civilian death toll is likely.
Speaker 0: These publications were a game changer. This really opened the eyes of the public to what was going on. It's, my great, great pleasure to present you with the Sydney Peace Medal for your conviction that truth matters and that justice depends on it.
Speaker 2: Assange has spent much of his time since then confined in one way or another. In 2019, the US charged him with publishing classified materials and has been fighting to extradite them.
Speaker 4: It's the first time the government has tried to use the Espionage Act against the publisher. That really is, you know, something new and something especially dangerous.
Speaker 0: They're keeping Julian in prison because they want to send a message that if they can do it to someone who has won dozens of prizes for the very publications that he's public he's being prosecuted over. They can do it to anyone. This is a precedent setting case.
Speaker 2: On this episode of Fault Lines, we look at what Julian Assange's case could mean for press freedom and the consequences he's faced for publishing state secrets.
Speaker 5: The government, instead of dealing with the policies disclosed by Assange, they've done what they always do. They blame the messenger.
Speaker 0: That volcano is already erupting. It's already erupting. It's an explosive eruption. Julian and I have 2 children, Gabriel, who's 5a half, and Max, who's going to be 4 in a few weeks' time. So Max was a few weeks old when Julian was arrested.
The answer I give my children about why their father is in prison is he angered some very powerful people who put him in prison, that Julian is in prison because he did something right, not because he's did anything wrong.
Speaker 1: The video is in
Speaker 2: To understand the case against Assange, we wanted to look back at some of the secrets he exposed. Perhaps the most famous one is this video of a US attack in Iraq, which he called collateral murder.
Speaker 6: Come on. Let us shoot. Okay. Claire. Come on.
Claire.
Speaker 1: Their desire was simply to kill and to find any excuse in the rule rules of engagement which committed that killing. And the behavior of the pilots is like they are playing a computer game.
Speaker 6: Light them all up. There's a true traffic. Come on. Fire.
Speaker 1: Hey, Roger.
Speaker 2: The footage showed a 2007 US helicopter attack in Baghdad that killed more than a dozen people, including a 22 year old Reuters photojournalist, Namir Noor Eldeen, and his colleague, Saeed Schma.
Speaker 7: Yeah. This is Saeed. And this is Namira.
Speaker 6: Light them all up. This is your true traffic. 2 60. Come on. Fire.
They're right. They're right. They're right. They're right. They're right.
They're right. They're right. They're right. They're right. They're right.
They're right. They're right.
Speaker 8: They're right. They're right. They're right. They're right. They're right.
They're right. They're right. They're right. They're right. They're right.
They're right. They're right.
Speaker 6: Oh, yeah. Look at that. Right through the windshield.
Speaker 0: I remember crying when I saw it and cried many times since when I watched that. It was just so cool.
Speaker 2: For years, US officials claimed that the Iraqis had been killed in a firefight, but it was only after WikiLeaks published the video 3 years later that the government's narrative unraveled.
Speaker 9: So that there was that sense of, oh my god. So they they they knew all along. They they must have seen this stuff.
Speaker 2: A military investigation cleared the pilots involved in the attack. The only people who faced any charges were those who leaked and published the video. Months after WikiLeaks released the video, it published nearly 400,000 classified military documents about the US led war in Iraq, capturing headlines.
Speaker 10: Modern warfare with its high-tech weapons was supposed to spare civilians. But in Iraq, that turned out to be a false promise.
Speaker 11: We estimate that when fully analyzed, these logs will bring to the public knowledge more than 15,000 previously unreported civilian deaths.
Speaker 0: The disclosure provides a trove of new evidence on the violence, torture, and suffering that's befallen Iraq since the 2003 US invasion.
Speaker 5: Here, for the first time, was official documents and diplomats not only confirming that these things are happening, but they were happening in a huge scale.
Speaker 1: Well, this particular set of documents is the most extraordinary compendium of war that has ever been released.
Speaker 9: It was astonishing. I mean, no no one had ever ever seen that amount of material or that nature of material and that quantity, before. This was an immensely complicated publishing task.
Speaker 2: Alan Rusbridger was the editor in chief at The Guardian at the time. It was one of several major news organizations that WikiLeaks partnered with to publish 100 of 1000 of classified materials between 2,010 and 2011. They were uploaded to WikiLeaks' website by an anonymous source and then vetted.
Speaker 9: You know, we spent weeks reading the material and saying, well, this is significant. This has public interest. This shows hypocrisy or deception. There there was certainly evidence of the American military behaving in in a violent, murderous, sometimes way and in deceiving the American people about it.
Speaker 2: The leaks exposed how the US government was turning a blind eye to torture, rape, and murder by Iraqi authorities and how its drone campaign in Afghanistan led to an increase in civilian deaths. They also revealed how flawed intelligence landed 100 in Guantanamo Bay prison and the reality of US diplomatic operations around the world. Assange is the only publisher facing any charges for releasing this material.
Speaker 5: To be, Julian Assange and WikiLeaks, did a major public service. As a national security reporter, if you're just relying on what you get from the agencies, you'd be peeling back a very thin layer of an onion. And so you're relying on whistle blowers.
Speaker 2: Could you imagine this information being disclosed if it weren't for WikiLeaks?
Speaker 12: Absolutely no. There's no way. You can maybe access them after 50 years, after 40 years. And at that point, that kind of information is not helpful to the, to the public.
Speaker 2: Of all the stories that WikiLeaks published, how many were proven to be untrue? None of the stories have ever,
Speaker 5: been shown to be anything other than true. If it was a libel, if it was misinformation, disinformation, you could partly understand why, the US and British governments might be upset, but why are they upset about publishing the truth?
Speaker 13: Well, good afternoon. The United States strongly condemns the illegal disclosure of classified information.
Speaker 5: I met one of the state department officials at, private party, and he was really angry, you know, and saying you're from a guardian. You've got blood in your hands.
Speaker 13: In addition to endangering particular individuals, disclosures like these tear at the fabric of the proper function of responsible government.
Speaker 2: And all these years later, did you have blood on your hands?
Speaker 5: Understood. If they discover that someone had been killed as a as a result of the WikiLeaks disclosures. We'd have known about it. They would have said, well, you're responsible for that, and nothing, ever happened.
Speaker 2: The Pentagon's chief investigator of the leaks admitted as much in 2013. Under oath, he said he couldn't provide a specific example of individuals killed as a result of WikiLeaks' disclosures. Nevertheless, Chelsea Manning, the former Army intelligence analyst who leaked the documents, spent 7 years in prison until president Obama commuted her sentence in 2017. The sentence that she received was disproportionate relative to what, other leakers had received.
Speaker 6: At the
Speaker 2: time, the Department of Justice decided not to pursue charges against Assange.
Speaker 0: They gave two reasons. One was Makes sense. Julian Assange is a publisher. He's not a hacker. And there's no way to go after WikiLeaks that would not set a precedent against the rest of the press.
Speaker 2: That position changed when the administration did.
Speaker 3: 2017 was when things got Shakespearean. There had been this growing tension and this real deep fear and concern about what to do about WikiLeaks.
Speaker 4: The Trump administration wanted to use this case not just as an opportunity to go after Assange, but as an opportunity to go after national security journalism.
Speaker 2: Much of Assange's story and the US's case against him is based here in the United Kingdom. It's where he spent much of his time under threat of prosecution by the US.
Speaker 1: And why are they going after after WikiLeaks? Well, they want to stop this publication of information that embarrasses them.
Speaker 2: After the leaks in 2010, Assange faced sexual assault charges in Sweden, which were later dropped. Fearing extradition to the US, he sought asylum here at the Ecuadorian embassy in London, where he remained confined to a small flat for nearly 7 years.
Speaker 1: The United States is conducting an aggressive investigation in relation to trying to get up a an espionage charge, against me personally, and the FBI has even gone to Wales, in the United Kingdom, to visit, very various people.
Speaker 11: Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, has been arrested in London.
Speaker 2: Assange was dragged out of the embassy and arrested by British police on a US extradition request in 2019. Assange
Speaker 9: is wanted in the US for leaking of 100 of thousands of classified military documents.
Speaker 2: That same day, the US Department of Justice indicted Assange under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Then weeks later, the US added 17 charges, all for activities that national security journalists engage in every day.
Speaker 4: Soliciting government secrets, communicating with sources confidentially, maintaining the confidentiality of the source's identity, and then publishing classified information.
Speaker 0: And it concerns publications about the Iraq war log, the Afghan war diaries, the US State Department cables, the Guantanamo Bay detainee assessment briefs, and the rules of engagement, which were part of the collateral murder publication.
Speaker 2: 17 of the 18 charges against Julian Assange fall under the Espionage Act. It's the first time the act has been used against a publisher.
Speaker 4: You hear the phrase espionage act, and you think, well, this is about spies. This is about, you know, people who want to harm American national security. What the act, is about in practice is whistleblowers.
Speaker 2: The timing of Assange's indictment matters. And to understand why, you have to go back to his time at the Ecuadorian embassy in London, particularly after Ecuador elected a president who was less sympathetic towards Assange and wanted to strengthen ties with the US.
Speaker 0: An embassy, if if they're not backing you, is a black hole. It has all the the the legal carve outs you would need to just disappear a person, second half of twenty seventeen onwards. It was clear that that was not a safe place for Julian. Like, you could feel it in the air. I feared for his life.
Speaker 2: At the time, the CIA was allegedly spying on Assange, including privileged conversations with his attorneys and physicians. CIA officials were reportedly concerned that he would go to Russia as whistleblower Edward Snowden had done, especially after WikiLeaks released Vault 7, the series which detailed how the CIA was hacking into devices to conduct electronic surveillance.
Speaker 3: It was like an apocalypment for the agency. They had seen other agencies have leaks, and they thought this will never happen to us. So the fact that all of a sudden, you know, this was being laid bare on WikiLeaks website caused CIA's director, Mike Pompeo to become according to our sources absolutely irate.
Speaker 14: It's time to call out WikiLeaks for what it really is. A non state hostile intelligence service.
Speaker 3: When Pompeo took over, he would tell people within CIA, I want you to draw up Russian
Speaker 14: military intelligence.
Speaker 3: Things that you could do against WikiLeaks. Don't worry about the legality. Give me the art of the possible. I'll worry about the lawyers.
Speaker 2: Zach Dorkman worked on a year long investigation for Yahoo News, which exposed that the CIA was doing more than spying on Assange. They were also allegedly having high level discussions with the White House about assassinating him.
Speaker 3: Trump said, well, why don't we just kill the guy? You know? Like, kind of but which is imminently believable because it's kind of you know, Trump would say stuff. He would just toss off things. You know?
Speaker 2: While these discussions were happening, a plot to kidnap Assange from the embassy was reportedly more advanced.
Speaker 3: If they try to take him, what are we going to do? You know? Do we ram into a car that's carrying him a Russian diplomatic vehicle? What if there's like a gun battle? Who's gonna do the shooting?
Is it gonna be us? Is it gonna be the Brits? What if he tries to take off by plane? Do we shoot the tires on on the plane out? And that's the stuff that really worried folks because they were advocated for by the CIA director himself.
Speaker 2: In an interview with Megyn Kelly, Mike Pompeo was asked about this investigation. He admitted that there's pieces of it that are true.
Speaker 14: Look. I I can't say much about this other than, whoever those 30 people who allegedly spoke with one of these reporters, they should all be prosecuted for speaking about classified activity inside the Central Intelligence Agency.
Speaker 3: You know, Pompeo calling for the prosecution of our sources meant that our story was true because you cannot be prosecuted for something that isn't true. Nonetheless, having the former CIA director himself come out and essentially confirm it is is a big deal.
Speaker 0: Mike Pompeo went rogue. He went rogue in relation to Julien. He went rogue in relation to WikiLeaks. And there were a lot of people who disagreed with that.
Speaker 3: What these Trump administration lawyers said was, look, it may be illegal period for you to do this, for you to render Assange and bring him back to the US, but it's definitely illegal for you to do this if there aren't charges against him. So there were charges that were basically rushed.
Speaker 0: You see, if you see what what's happening to Julian as a as a legal problem, you don't understand it. It's a political it's a political problem. It's a political persecution.
Speaker 2: If extradited to the US under the Espionage Act, Julian Assange faces a 175 year sentence. 170 years are just for receiving and publishing classified information.
Speaker 9: The thing about the Espionage Act is that there is no defenster. So you can't stand in front of a jury and say, this is why I did it. Please let me tell you about the public interest. It's just you did it, go straight to jail.
Speaker 4: It makes a felon of anybody who discusses classified information even if they learn that classified classified information from a newspaper.
Speaker 2: So in this interview, just in listening to disclosures to me
Speaker 4: That's right. We are violating the terms of the Espionage Act, in this conversation.
Speaker 9: The use of an act which was designed to clamp down on spying against acts of publication in the public interest just seems to me wrong.
Speaker 4: Whatever you think of Julian Assange, you know, whether you think he's a hero or a villain, it doesn't matter. What really matters, is a prosecution of Assange would have terrible effects on press freedom in the United States.
Speaker 15: A free and independent media is the bedrock of democracy. It's how public stay informed and how governments are held accountable. And around the world, press freedom is under threat.
Speaker 2: Since taking office, president Biden's effort to expand press freedom has been a welcome change from the Trump administration.
Speaker 4: And yet, so far, the Biden administration is pursuing the same the same strategy as the as the Trump administration did. I can't imagine that the Biden administration wants this case to be its press freedom legacy.
Speaker 2: Technically, though, the future of this case isn't up to president Biden, but to attorney general Merrick Garland at the Department of Justice. Is just as dangerous and deadly.
Speaker 4: Garland is gonna have to think about like, the first question is gonna be asked by any judge is what's the distinction? Like, where is the line between this case and the case tomorrow against the Wall Street Journal? He needs an answer to that question.
Speaker 2: We reached out to the Department of Justice for an interview, but they declined, saying they do not comment on matters related to ongoing extradition requests. When we followed up with questions months later, they didn't respond.
Speaker 5: Now I don't understand where the emphasis for this is coming from. Is it coming from the Department of Justice? Is it coming from the intelligence agencies? I mean, it's dangerous.
Speaker 15: Why is
Speaker 2: it dangerous?
Speaker 5: Because if you're basically saying to journalists, national security is out of bounds to you. I don't see it that way. National security apparatus, needs to be held to account the same as anyone else.
Speaker 12: It goes to the core of democracy. Unless you can access factual information about what your government is doing in secrecy with your money in your name. It's not democracy.
Speaker 2: Assange's lawyers are appealing the US's extradition request in UK and European courts. In the meantime, he's being detained at Belmarsh Prison in South London. He's been there for more than 3 years without a conviction. And the government, the appeals process, this can be dragged out for years to come. Are they winning without ever winning a prosecution?
Speaker 4: I mean, I I I think that the indictment alone of Assange has a chilling effect on national security journalism.
Speaker 12: It's definitely about sending a message to everyone. You should think twice, maybe 10 times before publishing, unless you want to end up like him.
Speaker 9: So if you think about it, what we have is an Australian citizen resident in Britain who are publishing material that on a third country, the Americans, don't want published. I can never imagine American journalists being extradited for publishing something that in other states, didn't want to be published.
Speaker 0: Having Julian in Belomarsh is to silence him and to disappear him. He's the prisoner who has been there the longest on his wing. He's in a cell on his own. He had a meanie stroke in October 2021. What we know is that his his health is deteriorating for every day that passes.
Obviously, if you put a person in a cage, it will shorten your life. It will kill you eventually. Right? It's not easy, but I don't feel alone at all. I feel like we're getting somewhere, that, the world has not forgotten about Julian.
Speaker 2: While we were in London, Stella and Nabil met for the first time.
Speaker 7: How is, Julian?
Speaker 0: He's had a a bit of a difficult time.
Speaker 7: Please tell him our greeting and, our appreciated for him.
Speaker 0: Thank you. He wants you to visit him in in Belmarsh?
Speaker 7: Yes.
Speaker 0: He would like to
Speaker 1: visit Yeah.
Speaker 7: I I would like to to visit him, and, I hope I will visit him here Yes. In his house.
Speaker 0: Oh, thank you so much.
Speaker 1: It's the
Speaker 0: lost picture. Pictures are made.
Speaker 12: Yeah. What should make the public upset is that it's this perversion that the government who caused millions of victims and millions of refugees, is the very same government who dare to say that Julian is a criminal and put lives at risk. It's an incredible upside down world.
Speaker 0: Thank you. You're welcome. I'm sorry for your loss.
Speaker 7: It's not, not just a meal. We hope, for in the end, justice for all, the first first thing for Julian to get free.
Speaker 4: If there were a successful prosecution of Assange, American media organizations would have to radically change the way they report about war and foreign policy, and the real losers would be us, the readers, who would have far less access to information we need in order to figure out whether government officials are doing the job we want them to do.
Collateral Murder
collateralmurder.wikileaks.org
@wikileaks - WikiLeaks
13 years ago this week Julian Assange published the Collateral Murder video showing the killing over a dozen people in Iraq, including 2 @Reuters journalists, seriously wounding 2 children He faces a 175 year sentence if extradited for truthful publishing https://collateralmurder.wikileaks.org
Video Transcript AI Summary
Engagement complete: "We just engaged all eight individuals." About eight targets remain; "one guy crawling around down there," and "one individual, appears to be wounded, trying to crawl away." Cease fire was declared: "We won't shoot anymore." Coordinated movement: "Pushmaster two things. Pushmaster two things. We need to move time now." A vehicle pickup: "a black SUV or bongo truck picking up the body"—permission to engage granted; "Right through the windshield." Intelligence notes a van in the middle of the road with "about 12 to 15 bodies." Evacuation denied: "negative on evac" and "IPs will take them up to a local hospital over." "Push Master CrazyHorse18. We're taking him." Movement: "moving south by the moss dome on that road." Final visual: "Oh, yeah. Look at those dead bastards."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Once you get on, just open up.
Speaker 1: Roger, I see your element. Got about 400. You're clear.
Speaker 2: Alright. Fire it.
Speaker 1: Line up. Let me know when you get in. Force you.
Speaker 0: Light them all up.
Speaker 3: 02 traffic 260
Speaker 2: Come on. Fire.
Speaker 1: Roger.
Speaker 2: Keep Keep
Speaker 0: Keep shoot.
Speaker 4: Pushmaster two things. Pushmaster two things. We need to move time now.
Speaker 0: Alright. We just engaged all eight individuals. Now we got a few of our
Speaker 5: super still firing. Roger. We got him.
Speaker 4: 26. This is 26. We're moving. We got this.
Speaker 5: Oh, I'm sorry. I'm
Speaker 0: hit him by heck. Alright. You're clear. Alright. I'm just trying to find targets again.
Speaker 4: 26.
Speaker 2: Got a bunch of bodies laying there.
Speaker 5: Alright. We got about eight individuals. Yeah.
Speaker 2: We got one guy crawling around down there, but, you know, we could definitely go down.
Speaker 0: Or shoot some more. Roger.
Speaker 5: Hey. You shoot. I'll talk.
Speaker 0: 2618. 2618.
Speaker 2: Oh, yeah. That goes dead bastards.
Speaker 0: Nice. 2618. Thank you, Andrea. Spears zero two in flight. Three change zone four at this time.
Speaker 3: Spears zero two, three change
Speaker 4: zone. Nice.
Speaker 0: Good shoot. Thank you.
Speaker 2: One guy moving down there, but he's in one
Speaker 4: to south.
Speaker 2: Alright. We'll let him know so they can hurry up in over here.
Speaker 0: It's 18. We also have one individual, appears to be wounded, trying to crawl away.
Speaker 4: Roger. We're gonna move down there.
Speaker 0: Roger. We'll cease fire.
Speaker 2: And we won't shoot anymore.
Speaker 0: He's getting up. Have you had a weapon on his hand?
Speaker 2: No. No. I haven't seen one yet. You guys got that guy crawling right now on the curb? Yeah.
I got him. I put two rounds in here, and you guys are shooting over there too. So we'll see. Air rocket.
Speaker 6: Any push master 36 l
Speaker 1: on this Hotel27 over.
Speaker 4: Hotel27, FlightMaster7. Go ahead.
Speaker 7: Roger, I'm just trying to make sure that you guys have my turf over.
Speaker 4: Roger, we got the turn.
Speaker 5: Come on, buddy. I
Speaker 2: got you to pick up a weapon. Yeah. We're trying to get permission to engage.
Speaker 4: Come on. Let us shoot.
Speaker 0: A push master CrazyHorse18. You're taking him. Push master CrazyHorse18.
Speaker 4: It's Bushmaster seven, go ahead.
Speaker 0: Roger, we have a black SUV or bongo truck picking up the body. Request permission to engage.
Speaker 4: Bookmaster seven, roger. This is bookmaster seven, roger. Engage.
Speaker 0: 18, engage. Clear. Come on. Clear. Clear.
Morning. Coming around clear. Roger. Trying to Clear. I hear him.
I I lost him. Got him.
Speaker 2: I'm firing.
Speaker 4: George, you push back to four. Do you got any BDA on that truck over?
Speaker 0: You're clear. Is a crazy horse standby.
Speaker 1: Should have a van in the middle
Speaker 0: of the road with about 12 to 15 bodies.
Speaker 2: Oh, Look at that. Right through the windshield.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Hyper five two zero four, free change zone four. Aggressive 20 command to 8 is active.
Speaker 0: Port arrival 311.
Speaker 3: 20.
Speaker 5: Magnetic radio aggressive 34 zone zone two zero eight four zone four. Call for exchange.
Speaker 3: Aggressive four three, zone correction. Aggressive three four, zone three zero is closed before exchange zone one.
Speaker 5: Aggressive three four, welcome. Roger.
Speaker 1: Roger, that's negative on evac and the two green kids to Rusty. They're gonna have the IPs up link up with
Speaker 5: us over here, Brake. No.
Speaker 1: IPs will take them up to a local hospital over.
Speaker 5: Copy over.
Speaker 0: Roger, stop break. Crazy horse one eight, request permission to engage. I'm picking up the wounding.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I'm returning information to engage.
Speaker 4: Come on. Let us shoot.
Speaker 0: A push MasterCrazyHorse18. We're taking him. PushMasterCrazyHorse18.
Speaker 2: I got it.
Speaker 6: Last call, station. Hotel two six.
Speaker 0: Moving south by the moss dome on that road.
Speaker 2: Oh, yeah. Look at those dead bastards.
Collateral Murder
collateralmurder.wikileaks.org
@AtchaJohn - Kindly Atcha 🍀
Work being done... It's #WPFD2023 So #FreeAssange What's the hold up? Just about the state of the #UN (my opinion), in Art form...👇👇👇 https://t.co/0JoOgpfr1o
@suigenerisjen - Jen Robinson
“We need to resist double standards”. Raising concern about global attacks on press freedom, not just in autocracies but here in the US, @AgnesCallamard @amnesty asks “who is imprisoning #Assange?” & calls for his release #JournalismIsNotACrime @UNESCO #WorldPressFreedomDay
@TrevorFitzgibb1 - Trevor Fitzgibbon
.El Pais has unearthed shocking revelations concerning UC Global and its illegal surveillance of @WikiLeaks publisher #JulianAssange, attorneys & journalists who met with him. This "must-see" Zoom Press Conference occurs Wednesday, June 7, @ 1pm EST. DM me for more info.
reSee.it AI Summary
The 2010 WikiLeaks CABLEGATE leak, the largest in US history, led to Assange's potential 175-year prison sentence. It exposed war crimes, prompting significant global changes. CABLEGATE ended the US Iraq occupation, aided CIA torture victims in court, and revealed US diplomats spying on UN counterparts like Ban Ki Moon.
@JuanAndOnlyDude - Juan Passarelli
The @wikileaks CABLEGATE publication in 2010/11 was the largest diplomatic leak in US history, & it’s partly why #Assange faces 175 years in prison. CABLEGATE exposed harrowing war crimes, when revealed, huge changes were achieved in the world: ⁃CABLEGATE Ended the US Iraq occupation. ⁃@CIA torture victims were able to use the documents to get justice in court. ⁃US diplomats were exposed for spying on their counterparts at the United Nations including Ban Ki Moon.
@JamesMelville - James Melville
Julian Assange hasn’t been imprisoned for his own crimes, but for exposing the crimes of others. #FreeAssangeNOW
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the priorities of society, highlighting how Tony Blair and George Bush profited from the Iraq war while Julian Assange remains imprisoned for telling the truth. The speaker also mentions the mistreatment of the Muslim community and the lack of consequences for those responsible for the war. They discuss the increase in global military spending, the rise of proxy wars, and the growing possibility of conflict with China. The speaker emphasizes that the world has become more dangerous, with Iraq being a prime example. They condemn the media's lack of integrity and the role it played in promoting the war. The speaker concludes by stating that war is embedded in our imperialist society, driven by the pursuit of wealth and power. They call for independent media to provide alternative perspectives.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 20 years ago, the US and UK invaded Iraq. Today, Tony Blair is free to go on television, has made a huge amount of money, the same with George Bush. At the same time, Julian Assange languishes in Belmarsh prison because he told the truth about this war. There is something deeply wrong with the society with those kind of priorities. When you look at the people who brought us the war in Iraq, the people who used everything at their disposal, the state machine, parliament, the media, when you look at what all those people did, nobody has faced any of the consequences.
Even when the Chilcot report reported, Tony Blair sat up his own press conference, paid for by the immense wealth which which he now has, the many houses that he has. He was made envoy for peace in the Middle East. He was given a night it was last year. Whereas all the people who told the truth about the war, the people who marched. What happened to them?
The Muslim community penalized by the Prevent system for telling the truth and for standing up for their rights. The people like Julian Sanj, imprisoning Belmarsh for all these years for telling the truth. I remember Tony Blair the day of February 15th when we had so many people marching in London, he said even if a 1000000 people march in London that's not as many as Saddam Hussein killed, well the war in Iraq ended up killing more people, he talked about human rights. This is about democracy. It's about getting rid of the dictatorship.
After he stopped being prime minister, what did he spend his time doing? Advising dictators. With us. The truth is all of these were lies. All of them were things where they said we are going to make things better and actually they made it worse and not just in Iraq.
Mark. In the last 20 years, armament worldwide amount of money spent on military has doubled nearly $2,000,000,000,000 are now spent went on arms every year, making the world a much more dangerous place. We've now got conflict not just between dictator in the Middle East with and the biggest imperial power in the world, the United States. We've now got effectively a proxy war in Ukraine between 2 major imperial powers, and both of them with nuclear arms. We've got much more real possibility of war with China.
Again, this will be a nuclear war and therefore the devastation of humanity. So exactly the opposite of what we were told 20 years ago has turned out to be the case. It's a more dangerous world. Iraq's a much more dangerous place. We have far more refugees than we had then.
The Taliban in Afghanistan, back in control. Terrorism has grown. And, indeed, where did ISIS and Al Qaeda come from? Well, in Iraq, they came from British occupied Basra province, where they were formed in prisons where many Iraqis were in prisons and the shameful thing is that the people who created the war is still being given awards, are still making huge amounts of money and in the case of Tony Blair, is still being invited on to the BBC to give his views on absolutely everything instead of being in the dock at absolutely everything instead of being in the dock at The Hague which is where I think most people in Britain would like him to be. From the very beginning, from the time he went to Bush's ranch in the spring of 2002, Tony Blair was absolutely fully committed to every aspect of the war in Iraq.
He lied about the existence of weapons of mass destruction, which had never been found because they didn't exist and there were all sorts of people who said so at the time, including the UN weapons inspectors who you might think would be people who did have some particular knowledge about this. This was all dismissed by Blair, by Alastair Campbell when they devised a dossier, and this is the man who promoted the dossier. Over the evening standard that day, Iraq can attack Britain in 45 minutes. I think a period of silence from Alastair Campbell would be welcomed by everybody instead of which he seems to be in podcasts and on couches all over the TV studios. This tells you something thing, about the lack of integrity and the lack of morals of so much of our media coverage.
I think the media role was very, very important. And again, that hasn't really been help to account at all. If you look at the broadcast media, particularly the BBC, it was an absolute disgrace. I remember Andrew Marr, who was the political correspondent who, just after the war started, said Tony Blair had won this argument.
Speaker 1: He said that they would be able to take Baghdad without a bloodbath And that in the end, the Iraqis would be celebrating. And on both of those points, he has been proved conclusively right, and it'd be entirely ungracious, even for his critics not to acknowledge that, tonight, he stands as a larger man and a stronger prime minister as a result.
Speaker 0: 20 years on, this is so important because it's not just about the past, it's not just about the present, it's also about the future. And this question of war is going to become a bigger and bigger question, over the next 2 or 3 years. The project for a new American Century was essentially about trying to redraw brought the world on pro US lines. American hegemony had to be maintained and had to be ended. Many of Bush's key advisers were people who were part of that project.
They could see that China was a rising power, Lee. It was also becoming a major military power. China is today the 2nd biggest military power in the world. It has long been with a permanent member of the UN Security Council, and it has long been a nuclear power. So the project saw the threat of China as a very real one.
They wanted to change the politics of the Far East of the Pacific in terms of the rise of China and to strengthen the United States leads in that region. They also wanted to redraw the politics of the Middle East and that particularly meant boosting Saudi Arabia and Israel, as their 2 closest allies in the region against Iraq and against Iran. And that's a policy that's continued. The Middle East itself, there are very few democratic governments. And that is to democratic government.
And that is to do with the way in which imperial powers decided on a particular form of government which really didn't care about democracy. They were concerned with having regimes which were closely connected to them politically, economically with Lee, and militarily. And that's what's been created. Yes, Saddam Hussein was a dictator. He was a dictator who was put into power through the acts of the United States, but he was by no means unique in that region.
Saudi Arabia, for example, has been engaged in a war against Yemen for 7 years. No question about regime change. The murder of a journalist carried out at the behest of members of the Saudi Royal Family. Nothing is done. We're talking here about extremely undemocratic states.
The British government, United States governments are perfectly happy to work with those people, as long as they keep the area secure for oil profits. That's the bottom line. We had many, many Iraqis in this country who campaigned with us against the war in Iraq. Not because they liked Saddam, actually they had suffered, they'd been put in prison, they'd suffered terrible all trades up and all sorts of things at his hands. So they knew exactly what was going on, but they also knew that the war was not going to make it better for ordinary Iraqis, actually, would mean, as it has meant, a breakup of the country, a complete destruction of lives, of livelihoods, of huge numbers of refugees who are treated appallingly when they get to any of the countries that were involved in the war, the impact of things like depleted limited uranium, all sorts of terrible things that the Iraqi people have suffered.
Perhaps the most shocking one was the revelation of what happened in the Iraqi prison of Abu Ghraib where American troops were torturing people, were photographing them in the most degrading way. We're treating them like animals. We're doing all these sorts of things. This is not only in contravention of every international legal agreement about the way in which prisoners of war, or indeed any prisoners, should be treated. It also told you exactly what the occupation was about.
The occupation was about repression and cruelty and putting down the people who dared to stand up against the American invasion and Abu Ghraib showed that in the most terrific terms. But you know, you can't separate a brutal with war, shock and awe, the bombing of cities which took place, the invasion, the cruelty, the siege of the luge, all these things that went on, you can't separate that from the repression that followed. They're very much part of the same thing. And if you're invading a country and occupying a country, one of the things you have to do is to dehumanize the population that you're occupying because you have to justify what you're doing and that's what they did. War is embedded in the kind of society we live in.
We live in a society which is imperialist, which is about conquering other countries reason extracting money from other countries. We live in a society where the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, so they don't care about whether your hospital is crumbling. They don't care if the roof of your children's school is leaking. They don't care if you can't afford to heat or eat, and you have to choose. Or maybe these days, you can't even afford boats.
They really don't care about those things. What they do care about is preserving their wealth and power and their ability to spread that wealth and power, and war and weapons are absolutely central to their ability need to do so. This is locked into their system and that's why they do it, and that's why we have to fight against it. We've got a mainstream media which is really not open to any views which don't coincide with a very, very narrow consensus. We need independent media so much.
It's so important that we can get alternative views out. That's why it's important to subscribe to Double Down News on Patreon.
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2006, Julian Assange founded WikiLeaks. Today, at 52, he remains a controversial figure. One of WikiLeaks' notable releases was "Collateral Murder," a video showing the US army killing civilians and Reuters employees. Despite Pentagon's refusal, the evidence reached WikiLeaks through whistleblower Chelsea Manning. This leak had a profound impact, exposing a war crime that couldn't be unseen. #FreeAssangeNOW
@Stella_Assange - Stella Assange #FreeAssangeNOW
On this day in 2006 Julian #Assange created @wikileaks. Julian is 52 now. He was 38 when WikiLeaks published Collateral Murder and was last free. The video shows the US army killing a dozen civilians, including two Reuters employees on assignment and the rescuers who stopped to help the wounded. Reuters formally attempted to obtain the video but the Pentagon refused to hand it over. The evidence of what had happened remained on US military servers until intelligence whistleblower Chelsea Manning sent it to WikiLeaks. Collateral Murder had a massive impact. The millions of dollars that had been poured into Pentagon PR messaging couldn’t make the public unsee the war crime. #FreeAssangeNOW
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers are engaged in a military operation. They mention firing, traffic, and engaging individuals. They discuss targets and mention bodies on the ground. They communicate with each other using code names and numbers. They mention RPGs and AK 47s. They talk about moving to a location and taking pictures. They mention flight and chase. The conversation ends with a request for Bushmaster 7 to go ahead.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. Firing. Your Wednesday line. Let me know when you'd be
Speaker 1: having before shoot. Line them all up. 202 traffic, 26
Speaker 0: Come on. Fire. Arrived it. Thank you.
Speaker 1: 6. 2 6. We need to move time now.
Speaker 0: Alright. We just engaged all 8 individuals.
Speaker 1: Alright. You're clear.
Speaker 0: Alright. I'm just trying to find targets again.
Speaker 1: Commander 6. Is it both after 26?
Speaker 0: 6. Got a bunch of bodies laying there. Alright. We got about, 8 individuals. Yeah.
We got 1 guy crawling around down there, but, you know, we could definitely
Speaker 1: 4, shoot. 1.
Speaker 0: Better. Hey. You shoot. I'll talk. Hotel 26 crazy horse 18.
Speaker 1: Hey, George. 18. This is hotel two six seven.
Speaker 0: Roger, currently engaging approximately 8 individuals, AIA, RPGs and AK 47.
Speaker 1: Cell 26, you need to move to that location once crazy off the sun And get pictures over. Hey,
Speaker 0: The hotel 26 crazy horse 18. I gotta go dead fasteners. 9. 26, crazy horse 18.
Speaker 1: Back into your spear zone 2 flight. 3 chase on 4 at this time.
Speaker 0: Hotel 26. Hotel 26, crazy horse 18.
Speaker 1: 2 c. Crazy horse, 18 Bushmaster 7. Go ahead.
reSee.it AI Summary
Disclosing private crimes is protected, but revealing government crimes can be criminal. #Assange exposed wrongdoings, but who to prosecute when we have a decentralized WikiLeaks? Important voices: @ggreenwald @mtaibbi @RobertKennedyJr @Cobratate @TuckerCarlson @BoringSleuth @_whitneywebb @naomibrockwell @Snowden. Is he a traitor or patriot?
@StevenNerayoff - Steven Nerayoff
Disclosing crimes by private parties is protected, rewarded & made public. But disclosing crimes by the government against its people can be a crime. #Assange clearly disclosed crimes of the wrong side. But who do you prosecute when we have a truly Decentralized WikiLeaks? @ggreenwald @mtaibbi @RobertKennedyJr @Cobratate @TuckerCarlson @BoringSleuth @_whitneywebb @naomibrockwell @Snowden #Traitor or #Patriot?
@wikileaks - WikiLeaks
This week (4 Oct) marks 17 years since Julian Assange launched WikiLeaks; Its mission: To bring truth to the public For his publishing work which revealed war crimes, corruption and abuses, its founder now battles against a 175 year sentence if extradited to the US #FreeAssange
reSee.it AI Summary
In early 2000, a counterintelligence investigation looked into whether Amdocs, a billing software provider, was used by Israel to eavesdrop on US government communications. The investigation also raised questions about telecom operations on 9/11. The Mossad and Israeli intelligence likely knew about the events of 9/11, including the sale of critical infrastructure to Ericsson and NeuStar. The Saudi connection, involving the Bin Laden family, is also significant. The 9/11 Commission and the Monica Lewinsky Trial were both seen as cover-ups. The article explores these connections and calls for justice. (499 characters)
@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury
In early 2000, federal agencies conducted a counterintelligence investigation to determine if Amdocs was being used by Israel to eavesdrop on U.S. government communications. Amdocs provides billing software to Bell Atlantic, which provides the phone systems to government buildings, including the White House and the State Department. This is what the Intelligence community would call "Blocking and Tackling" - I wonder what other Telecom operations took place on 9/11? Such fantastic "counterintelligence" that on 9/11 Former President George H. W. Bush happened to be attending a conference at the Ritz Carlton hotel in Washington, DC - (the Secret Service should have those records). Among the guests of honor was investor Shafig Bin Laden, brother of Osama Bin Laden. Put simply... There is no way in hell that the Mossad and Israeli intelligence weren't aware of EXACTLY what happened on 9/11 including selling out our critical infrastructure to Ericsson and NeuStar on that day, as well as replacing the phone and VOIP systems in the White House and all Government buildings while the False Flag operation took place on American soil that very day... The Saudi's are just as bad if not worse - fake Arabs who were financed and funded by the British - who have always owned them. Our next president needs to be someone who isn't going to play soft ball with these literal Demons, they sacrifice Americans on our own soil and then send our men and women off to a fabricated war to be slaughtered in their war games for more profit. The longer people in positions of power and influence ignore these indisputable truths: the more you ignore any semblance of justice for all lives lost due to the attacks from that day. Including and most especially the soldiers who died in the bogus "War on Terror" - where for 17+ years Ericsson sold their Geo-location data to the very "enemies" that the intelligence community and State Department worked to arm, finance and fund. Read the WikiLeaks Cables or my X Highlights & threads - everything, including war maps, documents and private emails are all there. Julian Assange should be freed as soon as humanly possible - especially if we want to live in a world and future worth fighting for. See links below for sources...
Video Transcript AI Summary
Amdocs Limited, an Israeli telecommunications company, handles directory assistance and call records for major US phone companies. Following September 11th, over 60 Israelis were arrested or detained, including some active military personnel. Investigators suspect that these individuals may have had prior knowledge of the attacks but did not share it. A high-ranking investigator mentioned "tie-ins" but refused to provide further details, citing classified evidence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Most directory assistance calls and virtually all call records and billing in the US are done for the phone companies by Amdocs Limited, an Israeli based private telecommunications company. Amdocs has contracts with the 25 biggest phone companies in America and more worldwide. Since September 11th, more than 60 Israelis have been arrested or detained either under the new Patriot Anti terrorism Law or for immigration violations. A handful of active Israeli military were among those detained according to investigators, who say some of the detainees Also failed polygraph questions when asked about alleged surveillance activities against and in the United States. Project is going to collapse.
Nothing information. Burdick is going to collapse. Nothing information. Investigators suspect that the Israelis may have gathered intelligence about the attacks in advance and not shared it. A highly placed investigator said there are quote tie ins.
But when asked for details, he flatly refused to describe them saying quote, Evidence linking these Israelis 2911 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information.
@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury
James Comey (SDNY) investigated the Clinton Foundation back in December of 2001 - we're all about to find out just how close to the September 11th, 2001 attack these people really were... Comey was a partner at McGuireWoods along with Mark Brzezinski. Mika's brother and Partner at McGuireWoods was nominated by Barack Obama to be ambassador to Sweden during the then ignored Iran sanctions that connect directly to the Clintons, their Foundation & Ericsson. Richard Cullen - Godfather to James Comey's daughter is Senior Partner at the firm and was hired by Mike Pence during the Russia probe. James Comey's daughter - Maureen Comey who defended Osama Bin Laden's spokesman was heading up the Violent and Organized Crime unit in the Southern District of New York (SDNY). She was one of the federal prosecutors leading the criminal case against Ms. Ghislaine Maxwell. https://vault.fbi.gov/william-j.-clinton-foundation https://abovethelaw.com/2017/06/guess-who-james-comeys-godchild-is/ https://telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2021/11/29/james-comeys-daughter-vs-bin-laden-aides-lawyer-legal-teams/
William J. Clinton Foundation
This initial release consists of material from the FBI's files related to the William J. Clinton Foundation, a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization. The bulk of these records come from a 2001 FBI investigation into the pardon of Marc Rich (1934-2013), aka Marcell David Reich, by President Clinton in 2001; it was closed in 2005. The material is heavily redacted due to personal privacy protections and grand jury secrecy rules.
vault.fbi.gov
Guess Who James Comey Picked As His Daughter's Godfather - Above the Law
Things could get awkward.
abovethelaw.com
James Comey's daughter vs Bin Laden aide's lawyer as legal teams line up in Maxwell trial
The 32-year-old Maurene Comey is up against the 'super lawyer' Bobbi Sternheim
telegraph.co.uk
@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury
Bush Sr. Meets with Bin Laden Family on Behalf of Carlyle Group on 9/11 https://newswar.info/bush-sr-meets-with-bin-laden-family-on-behalf-of-carlyle-group-on-9-11/
Bush Sr. Meets with Bin Laden Family on Behalf of Carlyle Group on 9/11
Former President George H. W. Bush, attended a conference at the Ritz Carlton hotel in Washington, DC. Among the guests of honor was Shafig Bin Laden.
newswar.info
@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury
The investigation shifted to the White House in September 1998 when Kenneth W. Starr, the Whitewater independent counsel, reported in his impeachment referral to Congress that the Israelis might have listened to amorous conversations between President Clinton and Monica S. Lewinsky. The White House and the Israelis dismissed the reports. https://archive.li/sjEIm
@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury
The 9/11 Commission was also a coverup that they managed to blunder and lose control of - this is what our government thinks of the deaths of 3000 Americans and countless soldiers thereafter... https://t.co/JU787w2333
@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury
The United States Federal Government spent more money on the Monica Lewinsky Trial than they did investigating the deaths of over 3,000 people on 9/11… Let that sink in. https://t.co/0wllShr6RF
@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury
More connections to the Bush Family, x-Secretary of State James Baker, the Saudis and the Bin Laden family... https://archives.globalresearch.ca/articles/WAL110A.html
@Stella_Assange - Stella Assange #FreeAssangeNOW
It’s actually very simple. Julian Assange started @WikiLeaks. WikiLeaks published information that those in power were suppressing. The West tried to kill him because of it. #FreeAssangeNOW #JournalismIsNotACrime https://t.co/hn9u5N7xIz
Video Transcript AI Summary
Learn how the world works, challenge those who control us, unite in purpose, and take action.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: People often ask, what can I do? The answer is not so difficult. Learn how the world works. Challenge the statements and intentions of those who seek to control us behind a facade of democracy and monarchy. Unite in common purpose and common principle To design, build, document, finance and defend, learn, challenge, act Now.
reSee.it AI Summary
Julian Assange faces a 175-year sentence if extradited to the US for publishing. His reporting exposed the infamous Collateral Murder release, revealing the killing of over a dozen people, including journalists, by US forces in Iraq. This crucial information came to light thanks to Assange. #FreeAssange
@wikileaks - WikiLeaks
Julian Assange faces a 175 year sentence if extradited to the US for his publishing WikiLeaks infamous Collateral Murder release shows the killing over a dozen people in Iraq by US forces, including two Reuters journalists; seriously wounding two children - which only came to light due to Assange's reporting #FreeAssange https://collateralmurder.wikileaks.org/
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 instructs the team to gather for item 2. Speaker 1 reports traffic. Speaker 0 acknowledges and thanks them. Speaker 2 urgently tells Bushmaster 26 to move. Speaker 0 confirms engagement of 8 individuals and ongoing firing. Speaker 1 apologizes for damage. Speaker 0 grants clearance. Speaker 1 and Speaker 0 discuss targets. Speaker 2 communicates with Hotel 26 and Crazy Horse 18 about engaging 8 individuals with RPGs and AK 47s. Speaker 0 gives instructions to move to the location for pictures. Speaker 1 confirms. Speaker 0 expresses satisfaction with the engagement. Speaker 2 communicates with Bushmaster 7.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. Fire. Here Wednesday line. Let me know when you've gathered for 2. Item all up.
Speaker 1: 2 zero two traffic, 2 60.
Speaker 0: Come on. Fire. Horizon. Thank
Speaker 1: you.
Speaker 0: Six. 2.
Speaker 2: Bushmaster 26. Bushmaster 26. We need to move time now.
Speaker 0: Seven. Alright. We just engaged all 8 individuals. And we got 2. We're we're still firing.
Got it. Got it.
Speaker 1: Six. This is 26. We're moving. We got this. Oh, I'm sorry.
Speaker 0: I was bypassing. Got damaged, Kyle. Sorry. Alright. You're clear.
Alright. I'm just trying to find targets again.
Speaker 1: Six. Master 6. This is Bushmaster 26.
Speaker 0: Got a bunch of bodies laying there. Alright. We got about 8 individuals. Yeah. We got 1 guy 2 around down there, but, you know, we could definitely get a jump or shoot some more.
Got it. 6. Hey. You shoot. I'll talk.
Hotel 26 crazy horse 18.
Speaker 2: Crazy horse 18, This is hotel 26
Speaker 0: over. Roger, currently engaging approximately 8 individuals, AIA, RPGs and AK 47.
Speaker 2: Cell 2 6, you need to move to that location once crazy one is done and get pictures over.
Speaker 0: 2 20 and the location. The hotel 26 crazy horse 18. Oh, yeah. There goes dead bastards. Nice.
Nice. 26. Crazy horse 18. 6.
Speaker 1: 2
Speaker 0: 2 Hotel 26, crazy horse 18.
Speaker 2: Crazy. You're towards 18 Bushmaster 7. Go ahead.
Collateral Murder
collateralmurder.wikileaks.org
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2009, Wikileaks exposed a US Air Force memo warning about the health risks of burn pits. Join us on 20th-21st February 2024 for #DayX, a rally advocating for Julian's freedom. Donate to support our cause at https://freeassange.org/donate/. Check out our website for more details. #25DaysOfTruth #Day22
@FreeAssangeNews - Don't Extradite Assange - #FreeAssange
In 2009, Wikileaks released a 2006 memo from the US Air Force detailing burn pits' health hazards. @mcarmystrong - Author #25DaysOfTruth #Day22 The dates for #DayX have been announced. 20th-21st February 2024. We will be rallying for Julian's freedom and we need you to stand with us! Stay tuned for more information. Your donations are greatly appreciated as we prepare for Day X. Click here to donate to the cause: https://freeassange.org/donate/ You can view our full interactive calendar over on our website: https://freeassange.org/
Video Transcript AI Summary
Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, is praised as an influential journalist who has shed light on important issues such as the burn pits. Through WikiLeaks, Assange emphasized the importance of truth and challenged journalism to become more scientific and peer-reviewed. In 2009, WikiLeaks released a memo from the US Air Force revealing the health hazards of burn pits, which eventually led to the passing of the PACT Act. The speaker, a war reporter, personally experienced the impact of burn pits while reporting in Iraq. They urge President Biden to release Assange from prison, highlighting the names of Beau Biden and others who have suffered from toxic exposure. A plea is made for justice and freedom for Assange.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As a war reporter and scholar of the global war on terror, I can say without a doubt that Julian Assange is the most innovative and consequential journalist of my generation. He has no business being in prison. One of the stories I've reported on, the burn pits, never would have been illuminated without the disclosures from WikiLeaks, the media organization launched by Assange. Assange sought to remove the narrative from journalism and privileged the truth. Through WikiLeaks' emphasis on primary documents, Assange challenged journalism to evolve into a more scientific, peer reviewable enterprise.
13 years before Congress passed the PACT Act for burn pits care, Assange and WikiLeaks in 2009 released a 2006 memo from the United States Air Force detailing burn pits health hazards. Like former US presidential candidate, Tulsi Gabbard. And like president Biden's own son Beau, I was exposed to the burn pits while reporting on the Iraq war in 2008. I'm grateful to Assange for his courageous work and therefore, this Christmas season, I asked president Biden to release this hero of our time from the Belmarsh prison in London. The name of Beau Biden and all of the occupiers unoccupied who've died from toxic exposure.
I beg of you, mister president. Do the right thing! Free Julian Assange.
@Stella_Assange - Stella Assange #FreeAssangeNOW
Julian Assange is still trending! Be his voice as he spends his fifth Christmas in Belmarsh high security prison. #JournalismIsNotACrime #FreeAssangeNOW https://t.co/VdclMf4ctl
reSee.it AI Summary
Julian Assange, considered an enemy of the state, awaits his day in court on 18 charges, including espionage, for WikiLeaks' release of confidential US military records. A two-day hearing in February may be his last chance to prevent extradition to the US. Listen to his 2013 speech at OHM festival, where he discusses the reality of the "deep state/NWO" and its influence. #FreeAssange
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
This man is considered an enemy of the state because he dared to tell the truth and pierce the veil of the national security state. He now sits alone in a cell awaiting his upcoming day in court. Julian Assange, 52, is wanted by U.S. authorities on 18 counts, including one under a spying act, relating to WikiLeaks' release of vast troves of confidential U.S. military records and diplomatic cables which Washington said had put lives in danger. On Feb. 20-21 two judges will review an earlier ruling which had refused Assange permission to appeal. "The two-day hearing may be the final chance for Julian Assange to prevent his extradition to the United States," WikiLeaks said in a statement. With that in mind I urge you to listen to this speech he gave at the Observe, Hack, Make (OHM) festival in 2013. It is prophetic in many ways and serves as a distinctively poignant reminder of the forces we all face. Every American needs to hear him explain how ”the deep state/NWO” is indeed very real, a “cult within the culture” as he puts it. #FreeAssange @wikileaks @Stella_Assange
reSee.it AI Summary
Claims are made that @Stella_Assange, who claims to be Julian Assange's wife, is lying about her identity and connections. It is alleged that her real name is Sara Gonzalez Devant and her father, Sergio Albio Gonzales, worked with Assange's rape accuser Anna Ardin for the CIA. Julian Assange's upbringing in the Royal Australian Air Force Intelligence is mentioned, along with allegations of his fake wife and trafficked children. The authenticity of Assange's mother, Christine Ann Assange, is questioned. WikiLeaks is accused of being created by Rothschild Intelligence to target whistleblowers. The trial is said to be conducted by the City of London Corporation, with connections to Rothschild, Soros, and Murdoch. #FreeAssangeNOW #DayX
@ChiefSands_ - Chief Sands
JULIAN ASSANGE UPDATE | Chief Sands - 16FEB2024 100% Proof @Stella_Assange is LYING about being Julian Assange's wife!! >> Watch this *fast speed* video NOW !! << Her real name is Sara Gonzalez Devant, and her secret agent dad is Sergio Albio Gonzales who worked with Julian Assange's rape accuser Anna Ardin in Cuba for CIA with SIDA. Her mentor when she started working for #WikiLeaks was US Dept. of Defense's & US Joint Staff's Stephen M. Saideman. Julian Assange was raised by Royal Australian Air Force Intelligence aka The Family Cult tied to CIA. When Julian defected, CIA threw him under the bus and gave him the fake wife to go with the fake family. The kids are trafficked. John Shipton got ownership of WikiLeaks from CIA's Chief Nicholas Natsios thru John Young of Cryptome who was the first owner, and Young's father-in-law is Natsios. No photo of either Shipton exists with #Assange. The fake mum Christine Ann Assange was an auntie in The Family Cult. No photo of her exists with #JulianAssange before he was 39 years old, and she hasn't been seen in public in over a decade. She never went to the Embassy, hearings, trial, prison or even the fake wedding. Her two previous Twitter accounts were faked by #Unity4J. WikiLeaks was created by Rothschild Intelligence to trap, jail and kill #whistleblowers--which they did many like #SethRich, #AdrianLamo, #AaronSwartz, #MichaelHastings and more--and to push the false narrative that national security journalism is illegal. Don't fall for it! Julian's trial was conducted by Rothschild's sovereign City of London Corporation at Old Bailey Central Criminal Court which operates outside of UK jurisdiction. All Julian's lawyers and friends are tied to #Rothschild, Soros & Murdoch. FULL STORY: http://JulianAssange.com #FreeAssangeNOW #DayX
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video claims that a photo of Stella Morris pregnant with Julian Assange's child is fake, pointing out inconsistencies in the image. It also alleges that Stella's real name is Sarah Gonzalez Davont and her mentor was Steven M. Sademan from the US Department of Defense. The video further suggests that Stella's father is a secret agent who worked with Julian Assange's rape accuser in Cuba. The video questions the authenticity of other photos of Stella and Assange together, claiming they are manipulated. It also criticizes Kristinn Hrafnsson, WikiLeaks editor-in-chief, for allegedly lying about his journalism background. The video concludes by stating that Hrafnsson took over WikiLeaks without Assange's permission.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is the only photo of Stella pregnant. Supposedly pregnant because the photo is fake, and we're gonna prove that to you. It was put out by her boss, Rupert Murdoch, with 60 minutes. You can clearly see where the flesh of her neck never meets the flesh of her and shoulders. It was photoshopped.
What kind of fingers disappear into the belly? That's because it wasn't a real photo. Here's the text hand on that fake pregnancy photo. You can see the fingers are fused together, and there are holes and horns growing out of the fingers. You can see where they photoshopped not only Stella's knuckles into the belly and faked the tech's hand, which you can also see at the top of the belly where it disappears into the wall because it's a sloppy job, and they somehow photoshopped out the belly button, the navel.
It's not even there. Stella lied. She never had sex with Julian Assange. This is who Stella really is. Her name is Sarah Gonzalez Davont, and her mentor at the time she started working for WikiLeaks was US Department of Defense's and US Joint Staff's Steven m Sademan.
Sarah Gonzalez DuVon's mentor, Steven m Sademan. This was published by Stella's mentor, Steven m Sademan, for the US Department of Defense. There's Steven m Sademan on the right at the Pentagon working for the US Joint Staff. Here you see Stella's mentor, Steven m Sademan, admitting he worked for the Council on Foreign Relations and for the Joint Chiefs of Staff. And we already know he was publishing for the United States Department of Defense.
Now remember, he was Stella's mentor at the time she started working for WikiLeaks. That's very important. You already know Stella's real name is Sarah Gonzalez Davonte, but what she never told anybody in all these years is that her dad is a secret agent, and his name is Sergio Albio Gonzalez. He actually worked with Julian Assange's rape accuser, Anna Arden, in Cuba for Sida, s I d a, Swedish authorities. The baby picture Stella cut out of herself.
But notice the little boy on the left. That's her brother Adrian Gonzalez Davonte. Here's the same little boy, Stella's brother Adrian Gonzalez Davonte, pictured with his parents, Teresa Davonte and Sergio Alabio Gonzalez from Cuba. This is Stella's secret agent dad, Sergio Albio Gonzalez. He was from Cuba.
Not only did he work with Julian Assange's rape accuser, Anna Ardern, in Cuba for Sida, s I d a, the Swedish authorities, but he also worked with Nelson Mandela smuggling weapons for Rothschild, pretending it was some sort of an art community. It wasn't. If you look at Nelson Mandela's history, especially when he died, he took the Freeman Oath to City of London Corporation. So here's Stella's secret agent parents, Sergio Albeo Gonzalez and Teresa Davonte. And then on the left is Teresa Davonte at Stella's fake wedding.
We know it was a fake wedding because Julian Assange wasn't even in it. But if you wanna know all of the background on Sergio Albeo Gonzalez and Teresa de Bunt, go to julianassange.com. It's all there. So here's the supposed rainbow photo of Julian Assange with Stella Morris. Well, there's a lot of questions going on in this photo.
And first of all, when was it taken? Stella didn't even meet Assange until after WikiLeaks was going on, and he was supposedly on house arrest at Don Smith's house and then went to the Ecuadorian embassy for so many years. Right? Stella wasn't even in the picture till later, but there's a lot more than that going on with this funky photo. Look at the feet, for example.
He's much taller than Stella, and his feet apparently are now buried a foot underground because she's standing on the ground. Their knees are the same height, which is just not reality. Right? And his feet are just, like, buried underground. But there's much more going on.
Let's talk about it. So here's another funky thing going on with that thick rainbow photo. That's Sesangh's right hand supposedly. I mean, what happened to his hand? The skin's not even the same color.
It's got a missing finger. That hand is just all wrong. It's not a real photograph of a hand. Now look at Assange's head. The face doesn't match the neck.
The neckline isn't even an actual neckline. You can tell where they went out of the lines when they cropped his head on that guy's shoulders. But look at this. The left side of his face, he's got this beard. Right?
And I forgot to put it back on the right side of his face. So not only is the flesh from the head different from the neck, but the face line is all photoshopped, and they forgot to add the beard back to the right side of his face. I would say unbelievable, but everything about all these pictures of Stella supposedly with Assange all have the same errors on them. So it's expected now. So, no, I don't believe that is Julian Assange's body in that rainbow peck or it's Stella.
If you look at the head of Assange, right, it's too small for that body. Assange isn't that chunky. Didn't have a small head. So no. The beard was forgotten on the right side of the face.
The line around the jaw is all messed up. The hand is messed up. His feet are way down underground. His knees match Stella's, which is not actual. It's not so I really think that's MC McGrath in that picture with Stella because if you look at the far right photo, that's MC McGrath walking off alone with Stella.
Now MC McGrath was the guy showing up with Stella before her name even hit, you know, the media. He was showing up with Stella at these pre hearings and hearings and trial. So, no, I I don't believe for one second that's the signs with Stella in that picture. Okay. Now everybody remembers this photo of Stella Morris, supposedly with Julian Assange.
It's put out by the Sunday Times. That's Rupert Murdoch, one of her bosses. K. So the first thing you're gonna wonder when you're looking at this portrait is why is the signs looking the other way? Well, let's look closer because I want you to focus on his neck.
Okay. So look at his neck. Do you see something odd on his left side of his neck besides the double chin that he doesn't even have. Right? Well, that's where they crocked his head on.
And we have more evidence of that as we're gonna keep looking. Note his left hand on Stella's left shoulder and the hair because we're gonna zoom in on that area and show you that even the strands of Stella's hair don't match. K. Let's keep going. Let's talk about this for just a moment.
We already know that Rupert Murdoch put out this photo, and we know Julian Assange's lawyer, Jennifer Robinson, also works for Rupert Murdoch. We saw in previous videos that Stella faked the pregnancy photo and the rainbow pic, lied about who her mentor was, which was US Department of Defense Steven Stedeman, when she started working for WikiLeaks and is trying to hide who her secret agent dad, Sergio Albeo Gonzalez, is who worked with Julian Assange's rape accuser Anna Arden in Cuba for SITA. Right? So we we have Stella's shady history. And then we see this portrait photo put out by Murdoch all over the place.
Also, just another fraud. And we have another video on another fake photo coming up after this. But you know what this means? It means those kids are trafficked. That's what that means.
Anyway, let's examine this a little closer. So that's right where they photoshopped Julian Assange's head onto whoever was holding stare Stella, and that's why they made Assange look the other way. I guess it was just the only photo they thought they might be able to get away with. But look at that double chin. Assange does not have a double chin.
He doesn't have a dimple. It's not Assange's chin. And the more you look at it, the more you it's very apparent that Assange's head was pasted onto that body. See the close-up on that right side of his neck? It's just, like, all too blended.
It's not natural looking, and his chin is really funky looking. Right? So now start to look at Assange's left fingers because we're gonna go close-up on that. And it's Stella's hair where her strands of hair do not meet up. They did some kind of of a sloppy job there trying to paste Assange's hand next to Stella's hair.
Okay. So you see Sanji's finger. Now look at the lines. If that were an actual photo, the lines on the strands of Stella's hair would not break up and go into different directions. That's it's just not a real photo.
Again so if you thought Assange's double chin and his pasted neck and Stella's strands of hair not meeting up was all weird. Right? Well, look at this. This is Assange's arm, his forearm, and his elbow. I didn't do that.
That's the original, and it's painted on there. It's airbrushed. So many things about that portrait photo are just off. So when you look at that, just remember how Stella is lying about her family, her history, who she worked for, and all the photos, the pregnancy. I mean, how can you really walk for 2 years into a place of, you know, business?
Right? Place where you say you work. And nobody notices you're pregnant for 2 pregnancies. It's just flat out lies on lies, which puts Assange in a very dangerous situation to have this liar be broadcast all over the world like she's his spokesperson. K.
Let's look at one more photo. Recap. Right? The Sunday Times, Rupert Murdoch, Stella's boss, putting out this fake photo all over, and his neck is cropped on. Stella's strands of hair don't meet up.
Assange's forearm is all airbrushed onto there. It's a cut and paste. It's a fraud just like all the others. You can get some of these photos on stella morris.com. I also own that website besides juliana sanj.com.
Right? So you can go there and get all these photos. You can get them off the Internet. Blow them up just like I did. Study them.
Now that I've given you some direction, and you'll see. My gosh. Stella is is put in place to lie about Julian Assange. You know? If if Assange were really with Stella, they would not have had to fake any of these photos.
And that's really the biggest thing going on with Stella. This is the big lie. Right? Talking for a son. She's not talking for himself.
He's basically missing because the only people that vouch for him are people who are lying. Okay, guys. Here's another fake photo of Julian Assange with Stella Morris. I'll point out a couple of things right off the bat, and then we'll look at it a little closer. It's a pretty short video because it's quite obvious.
But look at the black halo around Assange's hair. And then ask yourselves why Stella doesn't have the same, you know, kind of a halo around her head. They they put his head in there. His shirt where he joins Stella, not only is her whole left shoulder just kind of lost and disappears right into his body, but his shirt is totally pixelated in that area, and hers is not pixelated at all. And then drop down towards his right hip, and you can see where they accidentally smudged it.
Now going down there, we're gonna look at that closer. And then look at the background. Right? Behind Assange's left arm, it's all black. And behind Stella's, it's blue.
It was taken from a different background, and then they just tried to morph them onto her body. Alright. Let's look closer. So this is a close-up of where they tried to morph signs onto Stella at the shoulders, you know, where she just loses her whole shoulder into his body. And later, you'll see how he loses his shoulder too.
But then you can also see that her shirt has no pixels on it. Right? His is totally pixelated. Let's keep going. That's the smudge on Assange's right hip where they they just get careless.
I mean, you'd think they'd spend extra time trying to make these things look good if they're gonna try and fake them, but they don't. They're just careless. But that's a big smudge just right over where they tried to join his body onto hers. That big white streak, that big smudge. Okay.
So this is the last photo, but, again, we're gonna remind you to look at the halo around Assange's hair that's missing from Stella's because they put him into that photo. That's why his background is black, and her background is blue. And when they tried to morph him in next to her, they just made his right shoulder kind of completely disappear. You know, it's it's not there. It's not proportional to his left shoulder.
And then her her left shoulder just disappears in his body. His shirt's all pixelated where they try to blend those photos together. And then they elongated light colored smudge on his right hip where they just got sloppy and didn't, you know, didn't make it right. But not only that. Stella is nowhere that near that tall anyway.
You know? It's just a total fraud, like the pregnancy photo, like the other photos, like her family and her background. But these guys have a lot of power because we're talking about Rupert Murdoch and all those tabloids in the United Kingdom, but they're all run by Rupert Murdoch's business partner, Jacob Rothschild, who runs City of London Corporation. It's that one square mile inside the middle of London, but it's not part of the UK. It's, sovereign, like Pentagon Reservation.
But, anyway, that's Murdoch and his partner Rothschild. These are the guys that run the tabloids, and they got a lot more power on than that. But we'll address that in a different segment. So, yeah, all those photos of Stella with the signs were faked. And it's pretty sad because it just well, in one way, it it shows us that the signs wasn't part of this.
You know? So he defected. Whatever they're trying to pull off and get away with, he's not part of that anymore. He defected. If he had not defected, he would.
They would not have had to fake all those photos. I mean, that's just so obvious. Right? Okay. Let's keep going.
So this last photo is gonna give you a little better perspective on a couple of more things wrong with this photo. So let's look at Stella's left arm as it's going back behind Asante's body. There's no flesh colored skin there, and there should be because the light is coming from in front. There's no reason why she shouldn't have some skin showing there where the arm is going back behind Assange. And then if you look at Assange's left arm, and it looks at the side of his body, right, by that left arm where it's all ragged, because they just did another sloppy job.
Right? You know, it should should be pretty straight there, not just ragged like it is. So, yeah, poor Sanj. Not only did he defect and have this, like, lying spokesperson for him, but if you look at her character, poor guy. I mean, he's probably if he's still alive, right, he's probably just so upset thinking the whole world thinks that's his wife.
Can you imagine that being imprisoned? And, you know, the Murdoch, Tung, and basically CIA, because that's who Stella is, you know, hooked up with. You know, remember, so her dad, Sergio Albio Gonzalez Sergio Albio Gonzalez, working with Ana Arden in Cuba for SITA. Well, everybody knew Ana Arden was hooked up with the CIA. Right?
That's what she was doing in Cuba. So it wasn't just that they were working together, Stella's dad and Anna Ardene, in Cuba for CETA, but they were working together for the CIA. Alright. That's enough for this photo. This is Kristen Gratnison.
He's WikiLeaks editor in chief, and he was WikiLeaks spokesperson. But he quit when he fell out with Assange 1 year before Julian Assange was silenced. What you'll wanna remember about Kristin Harrathmussen is he lied about his 20 year background in journalism. He doesn't have a 20 year background in journalism. When you go back and you try to research that 20 year period before he was working with WikiLeaks, you won't find anything except for this one story.
And this is a story about a story that never even got published. It's a story Heratnissen was supposedly working on about a bank, but then the story is his whole team got fired, and the story was crushed. So the one story we find about Barafnesson was a story that never even got published. What you'll also wanna note about Grafniksen is he came from Iceland, and Iceland doesn't even have their own army. They have US army as their army.
Sands was in the United States embassy in Iceland with Harafnissen. So, basically, Harafnissen is a liar who took over WikiLeaks without Julian Assange's permission.
Assange Docuseries – Chief Sands: 1-202-989-9990 (USA) Julian@JulianAssange.com
julianassange.com
@Judgenap - Judge Napolitano
The clock is ticking! My friend @MearsheimerJ on #FreeAssange #FreeAssangeNOW #FreeAssange2024 PLEASE repost. Use Hashtags. Together, we will get this message to the #HighCourt to #SETHIMFREE https://t.co/mMMqUUURhY
Video Transcript AI Summary
Julian Assange, a journalist, should not be extradited to the US for publishing classified documents leaked by Chelsea Manning. Governments hide actions from public view, so journalists play a crucial role in exposing misguided policies. Assange, like the New York Times with the Pentagon Papers, serves the public interest. No harm resulted from his leaks, and he has already suffered greatly. Extraditing him would be excessive punishment. The British high court should set him free.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name is John Meersheimer, and I teach at the University of Chicago. My area of expertise is international relations. I'd like to say a few words today about the Julian Assange case. A determination will soon be made by the British high court on whether to extradite Assange to the United States where he has been indicted by the American government and will be put on trial. I am asking the court not to extradite him and instead to set him free.
I believe this is a straightforward case. Let me explain. For starters, the case involves a wide variety of classified documents that Chelsea Manning, who was a government employee, leaked to Julian Assange, a journalist who ran WikiLeaks, a famous website that publishes classified and private documents that were not supposed to see the light of day. Manning was caught and punished because she was a government employee, and she broke the law by leaking material that was classified to Assange. But Assange is a journalist, and he did not break the law, as it is commonplace for journalists to publish classified information that is passed on to them by government insiders.
If journalists in the United States were sent to jail for publishing classified material, the jails would be filled with many of America's most famous reporters from newspapers like the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the Wall Street Journal. But of course, that hardly ever happens. Simply put, newspapers publish classified material and hardly anybody ever goes to jail. Why is this the case? What is the reason for this situation?
Governments of every type, and this includes liberal democracies like the United States and Britain, sometimes go to great lengths to hide their actions or their policies from public view, which makes it almost impossible for the public to evaluate and criticize their behavior. Given that governments sometimes act foolishly, even recklessly, this is not a good situation. Thus, a rich tradition has developed over time in the United States where insiders leak information about classified policies to journalists who publicize the information so that the public can evaluate it and push back hard against misguided policies. The most famous case that illustrates this phenomenon involves the famous Pentagon Papers, which were a multi volume study of the American decision to enter the war in Vietnam in the 1964, 65 period, and then escalate it in subsequent years. Daniel Ellsberg, who was an insider and had access to classified material, leaked the papers in 1971 to the New York Times, which subsequently published them.
The story in those documents was starkly at odds with what the Johnson administration had been telling the American people about US policy in Vietnam. By most accounts at the time and certainly since then, both Ellsberg and the New York Times performed an important public service. They exposed a bankrupt policy that underpinned a war that the US could not win. Ellsberg did not go to jail despite leaking classified information, although it did appear at the time that he might be sent to jail. Certainly, nobody at the New York Times went to jail because, again, journalists don't go to jail for publishing classified information in the United States.
It is very important to remember that in the case of Julian Assange, he is not the equivalent of Ellsberg because he was not an insider who leaked the information. Chelsea Manning was the insider. Assange was the equivalent of the New York Times, and thus he should not be extradited so he can be put on trial in the United States. Unsurprisingly, government leaders do not like leaks unless they do the leaking, which they frequently do. Thus, they are powerfully inclined to punish those who do leak, and they even try on occasion to publish the to punish the journalists who publish the leaked material as is the case with Assange.
It is fair game for governments to go after leakers, but it is not acceptable for governments to go after journalists. Indeed, it would directly undermine freedom of the press, which is essential for monitoring governments and holding them accountable when they pursue misguided policies. In fact, one of the main reasons that the US government is so determined to put Assange behind bars is that he is exposed malfeasance by US policy makers. In my opinion, that is all for the good and essential for making a liberal democracy like the United States work as efficiently and wisely as possible. Two final points, First, it is important to emphasize that nobody was hurt because of the documents that Assange published.
Nobody's life was put in danger because of what he posted on WikiLeaks, and certainly, nobody was killed. For sure, the misguided actions of many US policy makers were exposed because of what Assange did. But that, in my opinion, is all for the good. 2nd, Assange has already paid a huge price for his actions. He has effectively been in prison for years.
Sending him to the United States where he is likely to be convicted and sentenced to a long jail term would be a case of cruel and unusual punishment. For all these reasons, I respectfully ask the British high court not to extradite Assange to the United States. In my opinion, that would clearly be the right decision. Thank you.
@DavidSacks - David Sacks
Julian Assange should be freed. Here’s why: #FreeAssange https://t.co/BSLv9OEhvY
Video Transcript AI Summary
Julian Assange, a journalist, should not be extradited to the US for publishing classified documents leaked by Chelsea Manning. Governments hide actions, but journalists expose them for public scrutiny. Punishing Assange would undermine press freedom. Leaks are necessary for holding governments accountable. Assange's actions did not harm anyone, and he has already suffered greatly. Extraditing him would be excessive. The British high court should not send him to the US.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name is John Meersheimer, and I teach at the University of Chicago. My area of expertise is international relations. I'd like to say a few words today about the Julian Assange case. A determination will soon be made by the British high court on whether to extradite Assange to the United States where he has been indicted by the American government and will be put on trial. I am asking the court not to extradite him and instead to set him free.
I believe this is a straightforward case. Let me explain. For starters, the case involves a wide variety of classified documents that Chelsea Manning, who was a government employee, leaked to Julian Assange, a journalist who ran WikiLeaks, a famous website that publishes classified and private documents that were not supposed to see the light of day. Manning was caught and punished because she was a government employee, and she broke the law by leaking material that was classified to Assange. But Assange is a journalist, and he did not break the law, as it is commonplace for journalists to publish classified information that is passed on to them by government insiders.
If journalists in the United States were sent to jail for publishing classified material, the jails would be filled with many of America's most famous reporters from newspapers like the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the Wall Street Journal. But of course, that hardly ever happens. Simply put, newspapers publish classified material and hardly anybody ever goes to jail. Why is this the case? What is the reason for this situation?
Governments of every type, and this includes liberal democracies like the United States and Britain, sometimes go to great lengths to hide their actions or their policies from public view, which makes it almost impossible for the public to evaluate and criticize their behavior. Given that governments sometimes act foolishly, even recklessly, this is not a good situation. Thus, a rich tradition has developed over time in the United States where insiders leak information about classified policies to journalists who publicize the information so that the public can evaluate it and push back hard against misguided policies. The most famous case that illustrates this phenomenon involves the famous Pentagon Papers, which were a multi volume study of the American decision to enter the war in Vietnam in the 1964, 65 period, and then escalate it in subsequent years. Daniel Ellsberg, who was an insider and had access to classified material, leaked the papers in 1971 to the New York Times, which subsequently published them.
The story in those documents was starkly at odds with what the Johnson administration had been telling the American people about US policy in Vietnam. By most accounts at the time and certainly since then, both Ellsberg and the New York Times performed an important public service. They exposed a bankrupt policy that underpinned a war that the US could not win. Ellsberg did not go to jail despite leaking classified information, although it did appear at the time that he might be sent to jail. Certainly, nobody at the New York Times went to jail because, again, journalists don't go to jail for publishing classified information in the United States.
It is very important to remember that in the case of Julian Assange, he is not the equivalent of Ellsberg because he was not an insider who leaked the information. Chelsea Manning was the insider. Assange was the equivalent of the New York Times, and thus he should not be extradited so he can be put on trial in the United States. Unsurprisingly, government leaders do not like leaks unless they do the leaking, which they frequently do. Thus, they are powerfully inclined to punish those who do leak, and they even try on occasion to publish the to punish the journalists who publish the leaked material as is the case with Assange.
It is fair game for governments to go after leakers, but it is not acceptable for governments to go after journalists. Indeed, it would directly undermine freedom of the press, which is essential for monitoring governments and holding them accountable when they pursue misguided policies. In fact, one of the main reasons that the US government is so determined to put Assange behind bars is that he is exposed malfeasance by US policy makers. In my opinion, that is all for the good and essential for making a liberal democracy like the United States work as efficiently and wisely as possible. Two final points, First, it is important to emphasize that nobody was hurt because of the documents that Assange published.
Nobody's life was put in danger because of what he posted on WikiLeaks, and certainly, nobody was killed. For sure, the misguided actions of many US policy makers were exposed because of what Assange did. But that, in my opinion, is all for the good. 2nd, Assange has already paid a huge price for his actions. He has effectively been in prison for years.
Sending him to the United States where he is likely to be convicted and sentenced to a long jail term would be a case of cruel and unusual punishment. For all these reasons, I respectfully ask the British high court not to extradite Assange to the United States. In my opinion, that would clearly be the right decision. Thank you.
@RSF_inter - RSF
🔴 “We call for the release of Julian Assange, for journalism, for press freedom, and for our right to know,” says @rebeccajvincent, present in court to monitor #DayX. The UK High Court is considering Assange’s final application to appeal. #FreeAssange ⬇️ https://t.co/bADaEFfH3K
Video Transcript AI Summary
We are outside the UK high court for Julian Assange's extradition hearing. If his appeal is rejected, his last chance is the European Court of Human Rights. If any grounds are accepted, more UK hearings may follow. Assange's health is at risk in prison, and extradition could be fatal. We urge the Biden administration to drop the charges and release him for press freedom and our right to know.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our main call remains on the Biden administration to drop the charges, close this case, and allow for Assange's release without further delay. We're here from reporters without borders outside the UK high court in London for the 2 day day x hearing, which represents the beginning of the end of the extradition proceedings against WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange. If this court rejects the grounds of his appeal, the only further recourse that Julian Assange will have will be with the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. If any grounds are accepted, however, we could see further hearings in the UK. While we hope that this court will deliver some form of justice this week, we remind the world that actually this case is political.
The power lies with the US government to bring this to a close at any time. Our main call remains on the Biden Julian Assange is sitting in a high security UK prison some miles from where we are now where his mental health and physical health remain at risk, but his situation would be far exacerbated in conditions of extradition which he may not survive. We call again for the release of Julian Assange for journalism, for press freedom, and for all of our right to know.
reSee.it AI Summary
Julian Assange has spent over 13 years detained and 1771 days in a UK prison for publishing information exposing war crimes. If extradited to the US, he faces a 175-year sentence in conditions deemed as torture. There is evidence of a CIA plot to kidnap or assassinate him. Major media, human rights organizations, and politicians worldwide have called for his release, citing the threat to press freedom and the right to know. Amnesty warns that extraditing Assange would set a dangerous precedent. #FreeAssange #JournalismIsNotACrime
@wikileaks - WikiLeaks
To date Julian Assange has spent 1771 days in a UK prison for publishing which revealed war crimes and human rights abuses Assange has spent more than 13 years detained in one form or another If extradited to the US he faces a 175 year sentence in conditions the UN's torture expert this month said would amount to torture @DrAliceJEdwards Earlier this week the publishers' wife, @Stella_Assange told assembled journalists that if Julian were extradited, "he will die" During the first day of the two day hearing on Tuesday the court was told of 'compelling evidence' of a CIA plot to kidnap or assassinate Mr. Assange, meaning that should extradition be allowed he would be sent to the very country that plotted to assassinate him Major media, free speech and human rights organisations have urged the immediate release of the WikiLeaks publisher including Amnesty, Reporters Without Borders, ACLU, PEN, HRW, The International Federation of Journalists, NUJ, The New York Times, The Guardian, El Pais, Le Monde, Der Spiegel, as well as politicians and leaders across the globe Amnesty: "Extraditing Julian Assange would set a dangerous precedent, threaten press freedom and undermine our right to know" #FreeAssange #FreeAssangeNOW #JournalismIsNotACrime
@wikileaks - WikiLeaks
Stella Assange: "This case is about whether state crimes can continue unpunished, unscrutinized - Julian's freedom is the only antidote. Julian Assange is the worlds most famous political prisoner...and the world is watching" @Stella_Assange #FreeAssange #FreeAssangeNOW https://t.co/jlgbu3QPsr
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses gratitude for the support at Downing Street, highlighting the importance of Julian Assange's case in defending journalism and truth. They condemn the attempt to silence Assange and emphasize the need for his freedom to protect democracy and human rights. The speaker criticizes those in power for their actions against Assange and calls for his release to prevent further injustice. They stress the significance of holding governments accountable and ensuring transparency in society. The speaker urges for solidarity in the fight for Assange's freedom.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wow. You guys are amazing. Not just the turnout this evening coming here to Downing Street, but also over the past 48 hours. It's been incredible. Every time I got to court, I was greeted by this incredible supportive crowd that was cheering us on.
And, I I told Julian all about how much support he has and also how much attention the media has given this case this time around. The world is watching. And finally, there's a realization about what this is really about, which is an attack on the truth, an attack on the public's right to know, and, a country's attempt to further their impunity and their cover ups and continue, to kill, with impunity without the threat of a media that will scrutinize them, of a public that will demand change. That cannot stand. Everything turns on the outcome of this case.
Whether states can criminalize journalism and put journalists in prison like they've been doing in the UK with an Australian citizen, a publisher who's won many, many awards for his journalism, and they've stuck him in the deepest, darkest hole of the UK prison system and threatened and the US threatens to put him in the deepest, darkest hole of the US prison system for a 175 years. Shame. Shame. Julian's imprisonment is a result of people with too much power who lost the plot, who got power thirsty, and are guilty. They know they're guilty, and they want to continue to live their their lives without any consequences for the crimes they've committed.
This case is about whether state crimes can continue unpunished, unscrutinized. Julian's freedom is the only antidote. We don't have a a decision today. Julian's life is at severe risk. Every single day he is in prison, he's a political prisoner.
He is the world's most famous political prisoner. We know what happened to the other most famous political prisoner last week. That cannot happen to Julian. It cannot be allowed to happen. The world is watching.
Julian has to be freed. Yes. Now whatever happens in the coming days, we can't know, but we can know that we will be there for Julian and be there for for our own democracy, our own future, our own ability to change policy, to change decisions, to change governments. Because if there's no scrutiny, we can't we can't be informed. We can't be able to change, make an informed decision about who we elect.
Our rights are at stake, but Julian's life is at stake. If he is extradited, he will lose his life. He will be killed. He will be killed by the country that has been plotting his assassination. And the court heard how the United States, under the previous administration, which maybe the next administration, had plotted to assassinate him, who had plotted to poison him, who had plotted to kidnap him, who had plotted to rendition him.
Shame. Shame on those who put journalists in prison. Shame on those who murder journalists. Shame on those who are afraid of the truth. That's not a society I wanna live in.
We're better than that. The UK courts are also under scrutiny. They have heard about the murder plots against my husband. They are on notice that the country that is trying to extradite him has planned to murder him. They don't deny it.
They just change the subject. The whole time we were in court, the other side somehow avoided to talk about what the what the documents Julian published revealed. They didn't talk about the war crimes. They didn't talk about the 15,000 civilian killings in Iraq that were revealed. They didn't talk about their torture and rendition fraud program.
They didn't talk about, Guantanamo Bay. They simply changed the subject. Shame. This case is brought by criminals who want to maintain their impunity, who want to avoid the courts. They are the fugitives from justice, not Julian.
Julian is justice. He is transparency. Yes. He is us. He is the public.
And as long as Julian remains in prison, we are all in prison. Yeah. And they are free. It cannot be. Free Assange.
Free Assange. Free Assange. Be there for Julian. He would be there for you. He is there for you.
He needs to be free. Free Assange.
@wikileaks - WikiLeaks
Friday 5 April marks 14th years since the WikiLeaks 'Collateral Murder' release by Julian Assange showing the gunning down of civilians in Iraq Assange faces a 175 year sentence if extradited to the US for his publishing in the public interest #FreeAssangeNOW #CollateralMurder https://t.co/WCCn8XIsd5
Video Transcript AI Summary
We engaged 8 individuals, losing 2. Moving to engage more. Identified RPGs and AK-47s. Requesting pictures. Confirming location. Engaging targets. Hotel 26 reports 18 dead. Continuing fire. Bushmaster 7, please respond.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright, fire. Here Wednesday, line. Let me know when you've gathered for 2. Light them all up. 2 traffic, 2 60.
Come on. Fire. Hey, Roger. Thank you. Thank you.
Thank you. We need to move time now. Alright. We just engaged all 8 individuals. And we got 2 of ours.
We're still firing. Got it. Got it. 2 6. The 2 6 will move, but we got this.
Oh, I'm sorry. I was bypassing. Got damaged, Kyle. Sorry. Okay.
Hit him. I hit him. Alright. You're clear. Alright.
I'm just trying to find targets again. Master 6. Is it best mounted for 2 6? Got a bunch of bodies laying there. Alright.
We got about, 8 individuals. Yeah. We got 1 guy crawling around down there, but, you know, we could definitely get a count or shoot some more. Got it. Hey.
You shoot. I'll talk. Hotel 26 crazy horse 18. Crazy horse 18. This is hotel 26 over.
Roger currently engaged in approximately 8 individuals, AIA, RPGs and AK 47. Cell 2, 6, you need to move to that location once crazy work is done and get pictures over. Try Ryan. We're 20 as a location. On the other.
The hotel 26 crazy horse 18. Oh, yeah. There goes dead bastards. Nice one. Nice.
26 crazy horse 18. Megan, Spears zero two is flight 3 chains on 4 this time. Spears zero two three chains. Nice. Let's shoot.
Thank you. Hotel 2 Hotel 26, crazy horse 18. Crazy horse 18, Bushmaster 7. Go ahead.
reSee.it AI Summary
Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, has spent more time in jail than Epstein's clients combined. He exposed war crimes and government corruption, including the "Collateral Murder" video. Assange has agreed to plead guilty to violating the Espionage Act in exchange for release. The media underreported the Podesta emails and Assange warned about endless wars. Populations are fooled into going to war. Assange's release raises concerns for the Clintons and exposes Israel. The media is criticized for its bias.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵Thread 🧵Post # 1 ▪️JULIAN ASSANGE▪️ The truth is always imprisoned. A short thread to honor a hero…. Scroll for Post 2 👇🏽 https://t.co/lRkFVpP1pv
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵THREAD 🧵Post #2 He was 38 when WikiLeaks published “Collateral Murder” and was last a free man. He is now 52 yrs old. The video shows the US army killing civilians, including 2 Reuters employees on assignment and the rescuers who were assisting the wounded. Reuters attempted to get the video but the Pentagon refused to hand it over. The evidence of what had happened remained on US 🇺🇸military servers until intelligence whistleblower Chelsea Manning sent it to WikiLeaks.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 directs to line up for 2 targets. They engage 8 individuals, with 2 remaining. A bypass is hit, but they continue firing. They spot 8 individuals, including one crawling. Speaker 1 communicates with Hotel 26 and Crazy Horse 18 about engaging targets. Hotel 26 reports engaging 8 individuals with RPGs and AK 47s. They plan to move to the location after completing the mission. Hotel 26 praises Crazy Horse 18's actions. Bushmaster 7 communicates with Crazy Horse 18.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. Sorry. Your Wednesday line. Let me know when you've gathered for 2. Line them all up.
Speaker 1: 2 traffic 260
Speaker 0: Come on. Fire. Alright. Houston. Houston.
Houston. Houston. Houston.
Speaker 1: Houston. Houston. Houston. Houston. We need to move time now.
Speaker 0: Alright. We just engaged all 8 individuals. And now we got 2. We're we're still firing. Got it.
26.
Speaker 1: Is the 26? We're moving. We got this.
Speaker 0: Oh, fuck. Sorry. Bypass? Got damaged, Kyle. Alright.
I hit a bypass. Alright. You're clear. Alright. I'm just trying to find targets again.
Speaker 1: Master 6. Is it base master 2 secs?
Speaker 0: Got a bunch of bodies laying there. Alright. We got about, 8 individuals. Yeah. We got 1 guy crawling around down there, but, you know, we could definitely get down or shoot some more.
Got it. Hey. You shoot. I'll talk. Hotel 26 crazy horse 18.
Speaker 1: Crazy horse 18. This is hotel 26, Hillary.
Speaker 0: Roger, currently engaging approximately 8 individuals, KIA, RPGs and AK 47.
Speaker 1: Cell 26, you need to move to that location once crazy work is done and get pictures over. Thanks, Ryan.
Speaker 0: So we're just wanting to 6 will be on the other. The hotel 26 crazy horse 18. Oh, yeah. That goes dead bastard. Nice one.
26 crazy horse 18. Megan, your spear zone 2 is flying. 3 chains on 4 at this time.
Speaker 1: Hotel 26.
Speaker 0: Hotel 26, Crazy Horse 18.
Speaker 1: Crazy Horse 18, Bushmaster 7. Go ahead.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
He spent more time in jail than all of the Epstein clients combined…. I wonder why that is….🤔 https://t.co/fbgL8VI2S1
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the connection between WikiLeaks, John Podesta's emails, and alleged pedophile symbols in Washington DC. It questions the involvement of Comet Ping Pong Pizza and Besta Pizza in child sex trafficking, pointing out symbols and suspicious behavior. The owner of Comet Ping Pong, James Alefantis, is scrutinized for his associations and questionable artwork in the restaurant. The transcript raises concerns about the authenticity of the information presented and calls for further investigation into the matter.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Warning to viewers, the following images are disturbing. This all began after WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange, released 100 of thousands of secret documents detailing a backstabbing Clinton Foundation, but it now appears the real truth Assange was leading us to was hidden between the blurred lines of Hillary Clinton's campaign manager, John Podesta's released emails. Fast forward past John Podesta's brother, Tony's casual email exchange with Thelemic spirit cooking adherent Marina Abramovic. Rosetta Stone was needed next, a verification that high level Washington DC predatory pedophiles were using a code to communicate child sex trafficking as casually as ordering a pizza. An FBI unclassified document from WikiLeaks revealed symbols and logos used by pedophiles to identify sexual preferences to include those who sexually abuse children as well as those who produce, distribute, and trade child pornography are using various types of identification logos or symbols to recognize one another and distinguish their sexual preferences.
Investigators should also be attentive to pedophilia symbols advertised on websites. During examinations of computer files, investigators should be conscious of subjects who try to conceal child pornography by labeling them with symbols instead of typical suggestive explicit names, thus, the interest in code words. Now clues, the menu from Comet Ping Pong. Notice the symbol of the ping pong paddles and its clever resemblance to the FBI documents symbol for child love. Alright.
Hang on, New York Times. Before you declare this fake news from your ivory tower, now look at the symbol for best of pizza, just two doors down from Comet Ping Pong Pizza, boldly using the symbol for boy lover as was recorded on the unclassified FBI document. The evidence begins to reveal that best of pizza and comet ping pong pizza may be competing for the lucrative Washington DC pedophile market right out in the open. Comet Ping Pong owner James Alephantis needs to explain himself, and so he did via the Hillary Clinton colluding New York Times. But so many questions remain unanswered.
Why was this said by the band heavy breathing performing in Comet Ping Pong? He likes the world sounds, tamales. And with the boys. And children. I think I was his manager.
Yeah. We all have preferences. Why is the artwork adorning comet ping pong's walls at the very least so insanely creepy, especially for a family restaurant? Why is aliphantus so close to Tony Podesta as revealed in the WikiLeaks emails? And why does mister Podesta collect
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵THREAD 🧵Post #4 In October of 2016, Julian Assange passed a message to Mark Halperin for Showtime’s The Circus stating the US media is underreporting “everything” about John Podesta e-mails released by Wikileaks. Halperin passed a note to Assange, who was taking refuge in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London at the time, asking what aspect of the Podesta E-mails is the US media underreporting. “Everything,” Assange wrote back.
Video Transcript AI Summary
My family and I have been dealing with Pizzagate rumors for a year. It started with John Podesta's leaked emails in 2016, leading to suspicions of child sex trafficking. Tony Podesta's friendship with a convicted pedophile and their taste in art, including pieces depicting child abuse, added fuel to the fire. The podestas' collection includes works by artists like Maria Marshall and Kim Noble, known for controversial themes. The presence of such art in their home and campaign office raised eyebrows. The investigation into Pizzagate continues.
Translation: My family and I have been dealing with Pizzagate rumors for a year. It started with John Podesta's leaked emails in 2016, leading to suspicions of child sex trafficking. Tony Podesta's friendship with a convicted pedophile and their taste in art, including pieces depicting child abuse, added fuel to the fire. The podestas' collection includes works by artists like Maria Marshall and Kim Noble, known for controversial themes. The presence of such art in their home and campaign office raised eyebrows. The investigation into Pizzagate continues.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My my family and I have been put through this Pizzagate bullshit, for from for now for a year. This Pizzagate bullshit. This Pizzagate bullshit.
Speaker 1: Oh, John. John. John. John. You didn't really think you were off the hook, did you?
I made an entire hour and a half documentary on Pizzagate. And it's only now, in part 2, that I'm finally discussing the people who are the epicenter of the Pizzagate scandal. It all started in 2016 when WikiLeaks released the emails of Hillary Clinton's campaign manager, John Podesta. When digging through the emails, Internet sleuths found words like pizza, pasta, and hot dog appearing in seemingly bizarre contexts, leading them to suspect that they were acting as placeholders to camouflage the discussion of child sex trafficking. This marked the start of the citizen investigation that would come to be known as Pizzagate.
Now in part 1, I talked about the emails and how they don't present any strong evidence of criminal activity. However, this does not mean that there isn't a good reason to be suspicious of the Podesta's. John's brother, Tony Podesta, is close friends with none other than convicted pedophile Dennis Haster, who once served as the speaker of the house. Podesta and Haster knew each other all the way back in the 19 sixties when they attended Camp Nose in Japan. Since then, the 2 of them have remained lifelong friends.
Another revealing detail about Podesta is his taste in art. Tony and his wife, Heather, are well known to be avid art collectors. Their collection is often featured at high profile artistic venues. These are the types of artists and works that the podestas are into. Margie Gierlings.
Maria Marshall. Justine Kirlin, Helen Van Mee, Bivana Jurdevich, Kim Noble. Julie Robbins. Now the purpose is not to attack any of these artists. The children in Maria Marshall's films were her own.
And Kim Noble is a woman who suffers from multiple personality disorder and is most likely a survivor of childhood trauma, but the artists themselves in the context of their works are wholly irrelevant. This is not about them. It's about the man who's into their works. It's clear that Tony Podesta has a taste for art that depicts child abuse and children in sexually suggestive positions. And not only do they exhibit this kind of art, but they hang it up in their home as well.
In a 2004 Washington Post article titled Married with Art, one section described houseguests of the podestas seeing the works of Katie Granite, a photographer known for her documentary style pictures of naked teenagers. They were horrified, Heather recalls, a grin spreading across her face, But you don't have to visit their house to get a taste of their disturbing art. In John Podesta's campaign office, there was a painting of 2 men with eating utensils hunched over a third man laid out on a table. Podesta said that it's better to be the guy with the fork than the guy on the table.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵THREAD🧵 Post #5 Listen to these words spoken by Julian Assange: ……the goal is to have an endless war, not a successful war.” Now look at Ukraine, the Middle East, https://t.co/62plkrYt3Y
Video Transcript AI Summary
The goal is to use Afghanistan to launder money from the US and European tax bases through a transnational security army, rather than to conquer the country. This creates an ongoing war, not a victorious one.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Because the goal is not to completely subjugate Afghanistan. The goal is to use Afghanistan to wash money out of the tax bases of the United States, out of the tax bases of European countries, countries through Afghanistan and back into the hands of a transnational security army. That is the goal. IE, the goal is to have an endless war, not a successful war.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵THREAD🧵 Post #6 Populations don’t like to go to war…and populations have to be fooled into going to wars.” -Iraq -Afghanistan -Ukraine/Russia -Israel/Hamas Does this make sense now? https://t.co/zYFgoSrYnm
Video Transcript AI Summary
Wars in the past 50 years were often caused by media lies spreading government propaganda. Populations must be deceived into supporting wars because they don't willingly choose conflict. A strong media environment can lead to peace.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nearly every war that has started in the past 50 years has been a result of media lives. And the media could have stopped it if they had searched these enough. If they hadn't reprinted government propaganda, they could have stopped it. But what does that mean? Well, that means basically, populations don't like wars, and populations have to be fooled into wars.
Populations don't willingly and with open eyes go into a war. So if we have a good media environment, then we will also have a peaceful environment.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵 THREAD🧵 Post #7 Julian Assange Famously Exposed War Crimes & Warned The World Of The Elite & NATO. He Exposed The Massive Tax Payer Money Laundering Being Done Globally By Warmongers In Government. https://t.co/eVKPlKx15z
Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a transnational security elite using tax money to carve up the world. To combat them, we must not petition but take over. We need to build our own networks to challenge warmongers in the US and other countries who are allied to profit from wars in places like Yemen and Pakistan, where money and lives are at stake.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No society anymore. What there is is a transnational security elite that is busy carving up the world using your tax money. To combat that elite, we must not petition. We must take it over. We must form our own networks of strength and mutual value, which can challenge those strengths and self interested values of the warmongers in this country and in others that have formed hand in hand an alliance to take money from the United States, every NATO country, from Australia, and the it through Yemen.
Wander it through Pakistan, and watch that money in people's blood.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵THREAD🧵 Post #8 Remember Just ONE MONTH Ago Tucker Carlson Said The US Government Is STILL Trying To Murder Edward Snowden. Just Before That Tucker Said The CIA Wanted To Murder Julian Assange… https://t.co/BjPxWi6GD4
Video Transcript AI Summary
A person accuses Mike Pompeo of covering up the US government's role in a president's murder. Pompeo allegedly pushed Trump to keep documents secret and was accused of plotting to kill Julian Assange. The speaker believes Pompeo is a criminal for his actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Committed a crime. He's threatening me. He's in my car. I'll never with my dog sitting next, I'll never forget this. And I said, are you really saying that to reveal that the US government had a role in the murder of a democratically elected president to say that out loud, that's the crime?
What about the actual crime, which is murdering a president? Like, you're covering up for that, Mike Pompeo. He had no no response at all. And so Mike Pompeo is the one who pressed Trump to keep those documents secret. And so it's like, what's crazy to me is not just that Pompeo did that.
I think Pompeo is a really sinister person and a and a criminal. I think that I think that because the facts suggest that he was caught. Yahoo News, Mike Isikoff wrote a long piece on this several years ago. His employees went to Mike Isikoff and said, hey. Mike Pompeo was plotting to murder Julian Assange, who's never even been charged with a crime in the United States as CIA director.
That's illegal. You're not allowed. Federal employees are not allowed to just kill people they don't like. Okay? Just just set the baseline here.
So that's who Mike Pompeo is. But he somehow intimidated Trump into not releasing this. Well, okay. That's all bad. Right?
I think it's criminal behavior.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵THREAD🧵 Post #9 After 5 years in jail, Julian Assange has finally walked free. Julian Assange wasn’t imprisoned for his own crimes, but for exposing the crimes of others….. Twenty years ago, George Bush and Tony Blair brazenly launched an illegal war in Iraq, leading to the senseless slaughter of a million innocent lives.
Video Transcript AI Summary
20 years after the US and UK invaded Iraq, Tony Blair and George Bush thrive while Julian Assange remains in prison for revealing truths about the war. The war's architects face no consequences, with Blair even being appointed as a peace envoy. The aftermath of the war has led to increased global militarization, conflicts, and terrorism. The media played a crucial role in promoting the war, and the lack of accountability persists. The push for war was driven by imperialist motives and the desire to maintain power and profit. Independent media is essential to challenge mainstream narratives.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 20 years ago, the US and UK invaded Iraq. Today, Tony Blair is free to go on television, has made a huge amount of money, the same with George Bush. At the same time, Julian Assange languishes in Belmarsh prison because he told the truth about this war. There is something deeply wrong with the society with those kind of priorities. When you look at the people who brought us the war in Iraq, the people who used everything at their disposal, the state machine, parliament, the media, when you look at what all those people did, nobody has faced any of the consequences.
Even when the Chilcot report reported, Tony Blair set up his own press conference paid for by the immense wealth which he now has, the many houses that he has. He was made envoy for peace in the Middle East. He was given a night with last year. Whereas all the people who told the truth about the war, the people who marched, what happened to them? The Muslim community penalized by the Prevent system for telling the truth and for standing up for their rights.
The people like Julian Assange, imprisoned in Belmarsh for all these years for telling the truth. I remember Tony Blair the day of February 15th when we had so many people marching in London. He said, even if a 1000000 people march in London, that's not as many as Saddam Hussein killed. Well, the war in Iraq ended up killing more people. He talked about human rights.
This is about democracy. It's about getting rid of a dictatorship. After he stopped being prime minister, what did he spend his time doing? Advising dictators. The truth is all of these were lies.
All of them were things where they said, we are going to make things better, and actually they made it worse. And not just in Iraq. In the last 20 years, armament worldwide, amount of money spent on military has doubled. Nearly $2,000,000,000,000 are now spent on arms every year, making the world a much more dangerous place. We've now got conflict, not just between dictator in the Middle East and the biggest imperial power in the world, the United States.
We've now got effectively a proxy war in Ukraine between 2 major imperial powers and both of them with nuclear arms. We've got much more real possibility of war with China. Again, this will be a nuclear war and therefore, the devastation of humanity. So exactly the opposite of what we were told 20 years ago has turned out to be the case. It's a more dangerous refugees than we had then.
Taliban in Afghanistan back in control. Terrorism has grown. And, indeed, where did ISIS and Al Qaeda come from? Well, in Iraq, they came from British occupied Basra province where they were formed in prison where many Iraqis were in prison. And the shameful thing is that the people who created the war are still being given awards, are still making huge amounts of money, and in the case of Tony Blair, is still being invited on to the BBC to give his views on absolutely everything instead of being in the dock at The Hague, which is where I think most people in Britain would like him to be.
From the very beginning, from the time he went to Bush's Ranch in the spring of 2002, Tony Blair was absolutely fully committed to every aspect of the war in Iraq. He lied about the existence of weapons of mass destruction, which had never been found because they didn't exist, and there were all sorts of people who said so at the time, including the UN weapons inspectors who you might think would be people who did have some particular knowledge about this. This was all dismissed by Blair, by Alastair Campbell when they devised a dossier. And this is the man who promoted the dossier. It was over the evening standard that day.
Iraq can attack Britain in 45 minutes. I think a period of silence from Alastair Campbell would be welcomed by everybody instead of which he seems to be in podcasts and on couches all over the TV studios. This tells you something about the lack of integrity and the lack of morals of so much of our media coverage. I think the media role was very, very important. And again, that hasn't really been held to account at all.
If you look at the broadcast media, particularly the BBC, it was an absolute disgrace. I remember Andrew Marr, who was the political correspondent, who just after the war started, said Tony Blair had won this argument.
Speaker 1: He said that they would be able to take Baghdad without a bloodbath, and that in the end, the Iraqis would be celebrating. And on both of those points, he has been proved conclusively right, and it'd be entirely ungracious, even for his critics not to acknowledge that tonight he stands as a larger man and a stronger prime minister as a result.
Speaker 0: 20 years on, this is so important because it's not just about the past. It's not just about the present. It's also about the future. And this question of war is gonna become a bigger and bigger question over the next 2 or 3 years. The project for a new American century was essentially about trying to redraw the world on pro US lines.
American hegemony had to be maintained and had to be extended. Many of Bush's key advisers were people who were part of that project. They could see that China was a rising power. It's a rising power economically. It was also becoming a major military power.
China is today the 2nd biggest military power in the world. It has long been a permanent member of the UN Security Council, and it has long been a nuclear power. So the project saw the threat of China as a very real one. They wanted to change the politics of the Far East of the Pacific in terms of the rise of China and to strengthen the United States in that region. They also wanted to redraw the politics of the Middle East, and that particularly meant boosting Saudi Arabia and Israel as their 2 closest allies in the region against Iraq and against Iran, and that's a policy that's continued.
The Middle East itself, there are very few democratic governments, and that is to do with the way in which imperial powers decided on a particular form of government, which really didn't care about democracy. They were concerned with having regimes which were closely connected to them politically, economically, acts of the the acts of the United States, but he was by no means unique in that region. Saudi Arabia, for example, has been engaged in a war against Yemen for 7 years. No question about regime change. The murder of a journalist carried out at the behest of members of the Saudi Royal Family.
Nothing is done. You know, we're talking here about extremely undemocratic states. The British government, United States governments are perfectly happy to work with those people as long as they keep the area secure for oil profits. That's the bottom line. We had many, many Iraqis in this country who campaigned with us against the war in Iraq.
Not because they liked Saddam, actually they had suffered. They'd been put in prison. They'd suffered torture. They'd suffered all sorts of things at his hands. So they knew exactly what was going on, but they also knew that the war was not going to make it better for ordinary Iraqis.
Actually, it would mean, as it has meant, a breakup of the country, a complete destruction of lives, of livelihoods, of huge numbers of refugees who are treated appallingly when they get to any of the countries that were involved in the war, the impact of things like depleted uranium, all sorts of terrible things that the Iraqi people have suffered. Perhaps the most shocking one was the revelation of what happened in the Iraqi prison of Abu Ghraib, where American troops were torturing people, were photographing them in the most degrading way, were treating them like animals, were doing all these sorts of things. This is not only in contravention of every international legal agreement about the way in which prisoners of war, or indeed any prisoners, should be treated. It also told you exactly what the occupation was about. The occupation was about repression and cruelty, and putting down the people who dared to stand up against the American invasion.
And Abu Ghraib showed that in the most terrific terms. But, you know, you can't separate a brutal war, shock and awe, the bombing of cities which took place, the invasion, the cruelty, the siege of Fallujah, all these things that went on. You can't separate that from the repression that followed. They're very much part of the same thing. And if you're invading a country and occupying a country, occupying a country, one of the things you have to do is to dehumanize the population that you're occupying because you have to justify what you're doing, And that's what they did.
War is embedded in the kind of society we live in. We live in a society which is imperialist, which is about conquering other countries and extracting money from other countries. We live in a society where the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. So they don't care about whether your hospital is crumbling. They don't care if the roof of your children's school is leaking.
They don't care if you can't afford to heat or eat and you have to choose or maybe these days you can't even afford both. They really don't care about those things. What they do care about is preserving their wealth and power and their ability to spread that wealth and power. And war and weapons are absolutely central to their ability to do so. This is locked into their system, and that's why they do it.
And that's why we have to fight against it. We've got a mainstream media which is really not open to any views which don't coincide with a very, very narrow consensus. We need independent media so much. It's so important that we can get alternative views out. That's why it's important to subscribe to Double Down News on Patreon.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵 THREAD🧵 POST #10 Now That Julian Assange Will Be Freed After Striking A Plea Deal, Bill Clinton & Hillary Clinton Have A Lot To Worry About Julian Assange Exposed Hillary Clinton Was Taking Saudi Arabia Donations & Approving The Arms Sales Supplied To ISIS. https://t.co/uIzRUFrrXd
Video Transcript AI Summary
In an early 2014 email, Hillary Clinton informed her campaign manager that ISIS is funded by the governments of Saudi Arabia and Qatar. This revelation is significant as it contradicts the belief that only rogue individuals were supporting ISIS. The Clinton Foundation received donations from Saudi Arabia and Qatar while Clinton was Secretary of State, coinciding with massive arms sales to Saudi Arabia. This led to a doubling of total arms exports during her tenure, with some of that money potentially funding ISIS.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's a early 2014 email from Hillary Clinton, so not so long after she left secretary of state, to her campaign manager, John Podesta. That email, it states, that ISOL, ISIS, is funded by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, the governments of Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Now this is a I actually I think this is the most significant email in the whole collection. Mhmm. And perhaps because Saudi and Qatari money is spread all over the place, include including into many media institutions.
All serious analysts know, even the US government, has mentioned or or agreed with that some Saudi figures have been supporting ISIS, funding ISIS. But the dodge has always been that's, what it's just some rogue princess using their cut of the oil money to do what they like, but actually the government disapproves. But that email says that, no, it is the governments of Saudi and the government, and Qatar, that have been funding ISIS.
Speaker 1: The Saudis, the Qataris, the Moroccans, the Bahrainis, particularly the Saudis and the Qataris, giving all this money to the Clinton Foundation, while Hillary Clinton is secretary of of state and the state department is approving massive arms sales, particularly to Saudi Arabia?
Speaker 0: Under Hillary Clinton, and Clinton emails reveal significant discussion about it, the largest ever arms deal in the world was made with Saudi Arabia, more than $80,000,000,000 In fact, during her tenure as secretary of state, total arms exports from United States in terms of the dollar value doubled.
Speaker 1: Doubled. And and, of course, the consequence of that is that this notorious terrorist Jihadist group called ISIL or ISIS, is created largely with money from the very people who are giving money to the Clinton Foundation.
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 1: That's extraordinary.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵THREAD🧵 Post #12 Exposing Israel 🇮🇱 They don’t like that very much now do they….? https://t.co/i1RsT7GVwF
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵THREAD🧵 Post #13 Julian Assange has reportedly agreed to plead guilty to violating the Espionage Act, in exchange for release from prison. Just a reminder: "possessing or accessing" material related to the "national defense" of the USA is something that the NYT, WaPo, WSJ, CNN, etc. do every day
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵THREAD🧵 Post #14 A brief summary of what happened to Julian Assange…/ https://t.co/B0z3A3HIWA
Video Transcript AI Summary
Julian Assange, founder of WikiLeaks, faced threats from the US government and CIA for exposing classified information. The CIA considered kidnapping or assassinating him while he sought asylum in the Ecuadorian embassy in London. Assange's releases, like Vault 7, revealed CIA hacking tactics, leading to his arrest in 2019. Facing extradition and potential life imprisonment, Assange remains in Belmarsh prison. His fate remains uncertain.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This guy is a traitor, a treasonous, and and and he has broken every law of the United States, and I'm not for the death penalty. So if I'm not for the death penalty and wanna do it, illegally shoot the son of a
Speaker 1: Date, 2017. Target, Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks. Location, the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. Objective, killer capture. Origins of this order from, quote, the highest levels end quotes of the US government and CIA.
In the song of the of which leads to your restaurant. Thunderous. To be so. Normally, a target like Asajj would be easy. Grab him from his way home from work, or shoot him as he walks to get his morning coffee.
The only problem was Asajj did none of these things. He hadn't done any of those things in years. For 5 years, Julian Asajj had been hiding in the Ecuadorian embassy in London. Killing him there or sending in the police would go against international law and be a foreign relations disaster. So the CIA had to concoct another plan.
First, they discussed secretly kidnapping him from the embassy and bringing him back to America, but that would make it too obvious America broke the law, so they changed tactics. Kidnap him, turn him over to the British. That way, no one would know who was behind it then. Right? But then there was still the chance he wouldn't get extradited back to the US if the British police got him.
Eventually, they got so desperate that they had no choice. They discussed the unthinkable.
Speaker 2: Did the CIA plot and plan to kill Julian Assange?
Speaker 1: Well, unthinkable for everyone else, very thinkable for the CIA. Going against every international law, they contemplated assassinating Julian Assange in the embassy where he lives. Poisoned, snipers sending an assassins, nothing was off the table. Quote, it got to the point where every human being in a 3 block radius of the embassy in London was working for 1 of the intelligence services, whether they were street sweepers or police officers or security guards, end quote. It turns out that UC Global, the company the embassy paid to keep Assad safe, had been spying on him for US intelligence all along.
The same company that Embassy paid more than $5,000,000 to over the last 7 years. WikiLeaks changed the game. When it launched in 2006, it was like nothing the world had ever seen before. Anyone with any important information or proof of classified secrets could submit their data to WikiLeaks anonymously. Something that was not very common back then.
What made WikiLeaks different from other whistleblower organizations is that they can never really be charged with stealing information. They didn't do any of the hacking themselves. So to a certain extent, they were innocent, which led to one other major advantage WikiLeaks had. Since they weren't involved in stealing the information, the classified documents they published could be used in courts. This was a game changer and terrifying for powerful people with dark secrets to hide.
In April 2010, WikiLeaks releases this video. It's a simple low quality video from an Apache helicopter involved in a Baghdad airstrike on July 12, 2007. This video was an airstrike that killed 18 people, pretty center stuff to the US military. What was strange, however, was that for a group of armed insurgents, they seemed to be walking around rather calmly while a loud, heavily armed, unmistakably Western Apache helicopter was roaming above. But rest assured, the US military promised us that, quote, there is no question that coalition forces were clearly engaged in combat operations against a hostile force.
There's nothing to see here. These were not enemy insurgent hostile forces that the US military shot up, but 2 unarmed photographers for the news agency Reuters, Namir Nur Aldin and his driver Sahid Chamah. The pilots mistook their cameras for weapons and a myriad of other casualties that didn't have any weapons or seem to be hostile at all. The US military just tried to cover up friendly fire on journalists. And almost instantly, the video was spread to every newspaper and online publication around the world.
Speaker 3: Of course, our top story this morning, the White House blasting the release of over 90,000 US military records on the war in
Speaker 1: Afghanistan. On August 16, 2012, the foreign minister of Ecuador announced that Julian Assange had been given asylum at the Ecuadorian embassy in London.
Speaker 2: We trust that the United Kingdom will offer as soon as possible the guarantee for the safe passage for this asylum of mister Assange and that they will respect those international agreements that they have signed in the past and that they have always respected.
Speaker 1: A tiny office in the embassy was converted into a studio with a bed, shower, treadmill, kitchenette, and computer. If he had guests, they'd visit him in his little studio. His lawyers, therapist, and even a personal trainer had to make do with the small space. If he ever stepped foot outside the embassy, British police officers were front and center ready to arrest him on the spot for skipping bail. And he would stay trapped in that embassy for 5 years before WikiLeaks released their most damaging data dump yet, all at the cost of the US government's dignity.
Julia Assange was a target for the US government under both president Obama and president Trump. He embarrassed the military, showed them how weak their security was, and on March 7, 2017, he released what they called Vault 7, arguably the most embarrassing data of the CIA and the US government. What was in Vault 7? All the internal documentation regarding the CIA's ultra secret hacking division and its tactics. The guys who were supposed to be the best hackers in the world had apparently been hacked.
This breach was not just embarrassing. It took away years of agency pride and dignity. The organization tasked with keeping America's secrets couldn't even stop a leak of their most classified information. Vault 7 had it all. Details on electronic surveillance equipment, cyber warfare weapons, and how they could break into almost every cell phone operating system on the planets, all out in the open for the world to see.
Agency officials used to, quote, laugh about WikiLeaks, end quotes, mocking the state department and the Pentagon for allowing so much material to escape their control. But now it was their turn. And for the CIA, revenge wasn't even a question. It was the only answer. Their blood was boiling and all they could see was red.
An example had to be made and the main targets? Of course, it was Julian Assange. WikiLeaks walks like a hostile intelligence service and talks like a hostile intelligence service. This new classification was bureaucratic speak that now justified the use of offensive measures against this non state hostile intelligence service. The fight was on and according to Mike Pompeo, there were no rules.
After his speech, he gave CIA officers the order to figure out the, quote, art of the possible, end quote. He said, quote, nothing's off limits. Don't self censor yourself. I need operational ideas from you. I'll worry about the lawyers in Washington, end quote.
On April 2, 2019, President Lenin Moreno announced Assange was no longer welcome at the embassy. Assange had very little time to prepare when 9 days later, the Ecuadorian government invited British police into the embassy to arrest Assange on the basis of skipping bail. That very same day, Assange was found guilty and sentenced 50 weeks in prison starting May 1st. The US's time had come. Asad had been secretly indicted over a year earlier in March 2018.
And on the same day he was arrested in London, the indictment was unsealed. He was charged with conspiracy to commit computer intrusion. A month later, while serving his son in the Belle Marsh prison, the US added 17 charges to the list. The maximum sentence, a 170 years in prison. A 170 years for the leader of an organization that wasn't all that different from other news agencies that published leaks.
At his extradition hearing in May 2019, Assange said quote, I do not wish to surrender myself for extradition for doing journalism that has won many, many awards and protected many people. End quote. Julian Assange is currently still in Belmarsh prison at the time of recording this video. If he's extradited, he faces solitary confinement in a supermax prison, a 170 years in prison for someone who did the same job as most journalists out there. Where I wouldn't be surprised if he met the same fate as our friend whose first name starts with a j and last name starts with an e.
Time will tell what the future holds for the whistleblower pioneer.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵THREAD🧵Post #15 Fvck the media BULLSH!T MACHINE! https://t.co/1oVZReeTqJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Wars throughout history, especially those involving democracies, have been fueled by propaganda and lies. Journalists, failing to fulfill their duty of providing truth, have contributed to this by spreading misinformation. In the US, each journalist is responsible for an average of 130 deaths due to their lack of seriousness in reporting.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That has ever existed. It has led to nearly every war that we have had. Certainly, the wars by democracies. All the big wars that you can name at least in the post World War 2 period and to a degree, even in World War 2 were built up. Their populations were mobilized on the back of lives from the Gulf of Tonkin incident to the Iraq War to the Gulf War.
So the the average desk count per journalist, I did a calculation for US journalists recently. It's something like a 130 kills per journalist as a result of them not treating their function seriously or claim societal function seriously, which is provide the truth, and instead spreading propaganda and lies of the major power establishments in the countries that they're in.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵THREAD🧵Post #16 I pray 🙏🏽 things go well for Julian Assange….what a travesty of justice we have witnessed yet again… https://t.co/MlRuQ6ePrH
reSee.it AI Summary
I discussed how NGOs have been transformed into tools for political agendas, claiming that civil society has become a "buyer’s market" for influence. Over the past forty years, the rise of think tanks and political NGOs has led to a situation where these organizations execute political agendas under the guise of grassroots activism. I specifically highlighted USAID, Freedom House, and various 'civil society' events as examples of how Western political interests manipulate these entities.
@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal
🚨ASSANGE ON USAID: ‘CIVIL SOCIETY IS A FABLE’ Assange exposed how NGOs have been co-opted into political weapons, arguing that civil society is no longer independent but a “buyer’s market” for influence: “The last forty years have seen a huge proliferation of think tanks and political NGOs whose purpose, beneath all the verbiage, is to execute political agendas by proxy.” He singled out USAID, Freedom House, and ‘civil society’ events as vehicles for Western political interests masquerading as grassroots activism. Source: @WikiLeaks
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Assange is right!
@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal
🚨ASSANGE ON USAID: ‘CIVIL SOCIETY IS A FABLE’ Assange exposed how NGOs have been co-opted into political weapons, arguing that civil society is no longer independent but a “buyer’s market” for influence: “The last forty years have seen a huge proliferation of think tanks and political NGOs whose purpose, beneath all the verbiage, is to execute political agendas by proxy.” He singled out USAID, Freedom House, and ‘civil society’ events as vehicles for Western political interests masquerading as grassroots activism. Source: @WikiLeaks
