reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@DoctorJanette - Dr Janette Nesheiwat
@ScottGottliebMD Everyone please get your vaccine.
@RobertKennedyJr - Robert F. Kennedy Jr
@Project_Veritas @pfizer Amazing reporting by James O'Keefe showing us what we already knew: Pfizer is a craven venal homicidal morally bankrupt criminal enterprise that has captured and corrupted its regulators.
@_sandyhamilton - exhortNATION
@luluHru https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/pfizer-ceo-reduce-world-population/
Did Pfizer's CEO Say He Wants To Reduce World Population by Half by 2023?
The pharmaceutical giant is not trying to be Thanos.
snopes.com
reSee.it AI Summary
A discussion on DNA contamination in the Pfizer mRNA vaccine took place. @P_J_Buckhaults highlighted the presence of DNA fragments derived from the vector used to make the mRNA. They suggested conducting single-cell sequencing studies to assess the integration of DNA in vaccinated individuals. @EdV1694 clarified that BioNTech is the license-holder and responsible for such studies. They emphasized the need to hold BioNTech accountable and shared relevant links.
@P_J_Buckhaults - Phillip J. Buckhaults, Ph.D.
Latest nanopore sequencing of all DNA found in @pfizer mRNA vaccine. there is quite a large number of little pieces of doublestranded DNA fragments derived from the vector used to make the mRNA. @US_FDA guidelines were set using studies of naked DNA injected into animals and seeing no ill effects. this vaccine is not naked DNA, but DNA encapsulated in a lipid transfection particle. it is protected until it is efficiently delivered into cells. the mutagenic potential of this DNA is lower than retroviruses but higher than naked DNA. someone should perform a careful single celll sequencing study of vaccinated people and document the absence (or presence) of integrated pieces of DNA. the vaccine has saved a lot of people from the graveyard, and it can be made even better by getting this DNA out of the manufacturing process. @US_FDA please insist that @pfizer conduct long term studies of somatic cells genome integrity after vaccination. i think this is important.
@EdV1694 - Robert Kogon (former "Esprit de Voltaire")
@P_J_Buckhaults @pfizer @US_FDA 1/This is obviously important issue. But Pfizer is not the license-holder, the German company BioNTech is, And, btw, the problem of DNA contamination has long been known in Germany. Sponsor of & responsible for such studies is always BIONTECH. E.g. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04368728
Study to Describe the Safety, Tolerability, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of RNA Vaccine Candidates Against COVID-19 in Healthy Individuals - Full Text View - ClinicalTrials.gov
Study to Describe the Safety, Tolerability, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of RNA Vaccine Candidates Against COVID-19 in Healthy Individuals - Full Text View.
classic.clinicaltrials.gov
@EdV1694 - Robert Kogon (former "Esprit de Voltaire")
@P_J_Buckhaults @pfizer @US_FDA 2/
@EdV1694 - Robert Kogon (former "Esprit de Voltaire")
@P_J_Buckhaults @pfizer @US_FDA 3/ Pfizer merely acted as BioNTech's (legally required) US agent and collaborator in the authorization process. See below.
@EdV1694 - Robert Kogon (former "Esprit de Voltaire")
@P_J_Buckhaults @pfizer @US_FDA 4/ No offense. But why is the entire opposition persistently barking up the wrong tree and typically not even mentioning BioNTech? It's very harmful and means that BioNTech, the legal manufacturer, license holder and legally responsible party, will never be held accountable.
@EdV1694 - Robert Kogon (former "Esprit de Voltaire")
@EdV1694 - Robert Kogon (former "Esprit de Voltaire")
@P_J_Buckhaults @pfizer @US_FDA P.S. Or here at Brownstone... https://brownstone.org/articles/read-the-label-its-biontechs-vaccine-not-pfizers/
Read the Label! It’s BioNTech’s Vaccine, Not Pfizer’s ⋆ Brownstone Institute
Whether or not it's the intention, the effect of incessant raging against Pfizer is to hide what's in plain sight: it's BioNTech’s product
brownstone.org
reSee.it AI Summary
In a series of recent incidents, several pilots have experienced incapacitation or sudden deaths. These occurrences highlight the potential risks associated with pilot health and safety. Examples include a pilot becoming incapacitated on Jet2 Flight LS-1711, leading to a safe landing in Budapest. Other incidents involved pilots falling ill or collapsing during flights, resulting in diversions and medical emergencies. These incidents serve as a reminder of the importance of pilot well-being and the need for comprehensive health protocols in the aviation industry.
@MakisMD - William Makis MD
BREAKING: Pilot Incapacitation - Jet2 Flight LS-1711 (MAN-DLM) Manchester (UK) to Dalaman (Turkey) (Oct.30, 2023) - First officer became incapacitated, pilot diverted aircraft to Budapest, landed safely Flight LS-1711 had 161 passengers and 6 crew Medical services were awaiting aircraft at gate Pilot incapacitations & deaths in Aug-Sep 2023: Sep.24, 2023 - Austrian Airlines Flight OS-188 (STR-VIE) Stuttgart to Vienna The captain became incapacitated, first officer took control of aircraft Sep.23, 2023 - Alaska Airlines Pilot - 37 year old Captain Eric McRae died suddenly in his hotel room during layover, was to fly that morning Sep.22, 2023 - Delta Flight DL-291 (CDG-LAX) Paris to Los Angeles - Pilot became incapacitated, was taken to cabin for care, plane diverted to Minneapolis, pilot taken to hospital Aug.27, 2023 - Air Canada Flight AC348 (YVR-YOW) Vancouver to Ottawa, one of the pilots felt ill and became incapacitated 50 min before landing in Ottawa. Aug.17, 2023 - IndiGo Flight (NAG-PNQ) Nagpur to Pune, India, 40 year old Pilot Manoj Subramanium died after collapsing at the boarding gate, about to board. Aug.16, 2023 - Qatar Airways Flight QR579 (DEL-DOH) Delhi to Doha, Qatar, 51 year old pilot collapsed as a passenger inflight and died, plane diverted to Dubai. Aug.14, 2023 - LATAM Flight LA505 (MIA-SCL) Miami to Santiago, Chile - 2 hours into 8hr flight, 56 year old Captain Ivan Andaur collapsed and died in the lavatory - plane diverted to Panama City! Aug.9, 2023 - United Airlines UAL1309 (SRQ-EWR) Sarasota to Newark, pilot had a heart attack and lost consciousness in flight Aug.7, 2023 - TigerAIR Flight IT237 (CTS-TPE) Sapporo to Taipei, copilot had a medical emergency after landing plane in Taipei I have been tracking COVID-19 mRNA Vaccinated pilot incapacitations and deaths throughout 2023. Article Link in photo to avoid shadowban, just re-type the URL into your browser @stkirsch @JoshYoder @USFreedomFlyers #DiedSuddenly #Pfizer #Moderna #cdnpoli #ableg
@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom
Arrest the criminals at @pfizer https://t.co/mx2RyGdBrD
Video Transcript AI Summary
A child named Maddie DeGary experienced severe side effects after receiving the COVID vaccine during clinical trials. She felt pain at the injection site and developed intense abdominal and chest pain. Concerns have been raised about the vaccine's safety, with claims of thousands of deaths in the United States. The vaccine's effectiveness has also been questioned, as a reanalysis of the trials suggested a higher likelihood of serious adverse events from the vaccine compared to hospitalization from COVID. Despite heavy promotion and potential coercion, vaccination rates for the booster shot remain low, with only 7% of adults and 2% of children receiving it. Many adults express reluctance to get vaccinated or vaccinate their children.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We made
Speaker 1: it. I love you. We had a successful vaccine. The efficacy was more than 90%. Oh my god.
Speaker 2: Maddie DeGary is one of the very first children in this country to receive the coronavirus vaccine. It was back during the clinical trials.
Speaker 3: Upon receiving the 2nd shot, Maddie immediately felt pain at the injection site. And over the next 24 hours, she developed severe abdominal and chest pain. And the way she described The chest pain, and I quote, it feels like my heart is being ripped out through my neck.
Speaker 4: The death rates from this vaccine There's been more deaths in 8 months. And in all the billions of vaccines combined over the last 30 years from this one In 17,000 recorded deaths in the United States, and we know the death rate's much, much higher than that.
Speaker 1: Was The Pfizer COVID vaccine tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market.
Speaker 5: Did we know about stopping immunization before, it's entered the market? No.
Speaker 6: The journal vaccine, Peer review. This is like the highest impact medical journal for vaccines. Right? They published a reanalysis of Pfizer and Moderna's original double blinded randomized controlled trials. And what they found was this, In the trials that led to the approval by the regulators, you were more likely to suffer a serious adverse event from taking the vaccine, Hospitalisation, disability, life changing event, then you were to be hospitalised with COVID.
So what that means is it's highly likely this vaccine, mRNA vaccine, should never have been approved for a single human in the 1st place. I've never seen something, when you look at the data, which has such poor effectiveness and such unprecedented harms in my career. It's like nothing I've ever seen before. I,
Speaker 1: Which was simultaneously promoted heavily?
Speaker 6: Not just promoted. Be coerced? Yeah. Mandate?
Speaker 1: What do you have to say about young men dropping dead of heart attacks every day?
Speaker 0: Is it time to apologize to the world, sir? To give refunds back to the countries that poured all their money into your vaccine that doesn't work, your ineffective vaccine?
Speaker 6: Hey. You have
Speaker 1: a little bit of record. Resulted in a success, and this success looks like the biggest scientific breakthrough of the last 100 years.
Speaker 7: A national survey presented to the CDC shows vaccination rates for the latest COVID nineteen booster are now in the single digits.
Speaker 5: Just 7% of adults and 2% of children have gotten the shot according to researchers. Nearly half of adults said they likely won't get it or give it to their children.
@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe
Woah @pfizer
@KenPaxtonTX - Attorney General Ken Paxton
BREAKING:🚨 I am suing Pfizer for misrepresenting Covid-19 vaccine efficacy and conspiring to censor public discourse. https://t.co/63mZ1y6FNC
@cosmicdawg9 - Sah
The CEO of Pfizer is a reptilian 🦎 Dude sounds like he’s from Transylvania we should’ve known 😂👁️ https://t.co/GFRErd6PPP
Video Transcript AI Summary
We are making this dream a reality with this announcement. The COVID vaccine has proven to be highly effective, although its logistics were complex due to the new technology.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And now I think with this announcement, we are making this dream a reality.
Speaker 1: Many of your medicines we know from the COVID vaccine, very effective, welcome. The logistics around that vaccine were not straightforward because of the new technology. Many of your medicines we know from the COVID vaccine, very effective no. From the COVID vaccine, very effective, very welcome. The logistics around
@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold
Deadly Disinformation Dozen #8: Pfizer CEO, Albert Bourla “You vaccinate not only for yourself, you vaccinate also to protect society.” It turns out neither is true. Bourla and Pfizer profited off disinformation, and they must be held accountable. https://t.co/vnev4X2AYY
Video Transcript AI Summary
The White House blames a few bad actors for spreading online misinformation that is causing harm. It is important to get vaccinated not only for personal protection but also to safeguard society. A member of the European Parliament from the Netherlands recently had a viral exchange with a Pfizer executive regarding whether the vaccine was tested for stopping virus transmission before being released. The executive clarified that the vaccines were extensively tested in clinical trials, but their specific effectiveness in stopping transmission was not known prior to market entry.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The White House pointed to an aggressive online misinformation effort by a handful of bad actors. Misinformation on social media is killing people. Yeah. You vaccinate not only for yourself. You vaccinate also to protect society.
Speaker 1: Covering from COVID for the 2nd time in just under 2 months. And last week, an exchange between a member of the European Parliament from the Netherlands and a Pfizer executive about whether the vaccine was tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before entering the market has now gone viral.
Speaker 0: Was the Pfizer COVID vaccine Tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market. Regarding the question around, did we know about stopping immunization before, it's entered the market? No. No. The vaccines were tested Ostensibly in clinical trials, and they were ex tested extensively in
@BlackTomThePyr8 - Tom Czerniawski
We're burning down Pfizer next. https://t.co/n1Euv9MjHn
@DowdEdward - Edward Dowd
Pfizer CEO excited about Cancer prospects for his company. This is in your face disgusting. https://t.co/97751PH1Ap
@TheMilkBarTV - MilkBarTV
🚨Pfizer's COVID vaccine what was promised vs. what was delivered👇👇 @ezralevant @OzraeliAvi @Rob_Roos @lhfang @DrAseemMalhotra @RobertKennedyJr https://t.co/qxQmdrqdJb
Video Transcript AI Summary
We achieved over 90% efficacy with our vaccine, providing protection against all identified variants, including the challenging South African variant. Studies in South Africa showed 100% efficacy. While two doses offer limited protection against Omicron, three doses are effective against hospitalizations and deaths. A fourth booster may be needed. The Pfizer COVID vaccine was not tested for stopping transmission before market release. No serious adverse events were found in our data analysis. Lawsuits have been filed against Pfizer for alleged misrepresentation of vaccine effectiveness and safety concerns. The success of our vaccine is a significant scientific breakthrough.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good afternoon. We made it.
Speaker 1: I love you. The efficacy was more than 90%. Oh my god. With all the data I have collected so far, there is no variant that we have identified that escapes the protection of our vaccine. Even the South African that has been, let's say, being the one, but it is the most challenging one.
Our studies in South Africa demonstrated, 100% efficacy. Every time that the variant appears in the world, our scientists are getting their hands around it. And they are researching to see if this variant can escape the protection of our vaccine. We haven't identified any yet. I don't expect in any scenario to be that we don't protect at all.
Actually, that's extremely, extremely alike. I think it could be anything from the protection remains very high to the protection is reduced. It's not 95, it is 70%, for example. And we know that, the 2 dose of the vaccine offer very limited protection, if any. The 2 doses was very poor protecting against Omicron, but the 3 doses were protecting very well against hospitalizations and death, not as well against infections.
It's necessary a 4th boost right now. The protection what we are getting from the 3rd, it is, good enough, actually quite good for hospitalizations and deaths. It's not that good against infections, but doesn't last very long.
Speaker 0: Was the Pfizer COVID vaccine tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market.
Speaker 2: Before, it's entered the market? No.
Speaker 3: When did you know that the vaccines didn't stop transmission? How long did you know that without saying it publicly? Are you worried about product liability? Are you worried about myocarditis? What about the sudden deaths?
Speaker 1: And we constantly review and analyze data. We've seen not a single signal, although we have distributed billions of dose.
Speaker 0: A reanalysis, published in the journal vaccine of Pfizer and Moderna's own trials found that the rate of serious adverse events, and we're talking about hospitalization, disability, life changing event, was at least 1 in 800.
Speaker 4: Pharmaceutical giant Pfizer was behind funding groups like the Chicago Urban League heavily lobbying for COVID vaccine mandates. This is the most lucrative pharmaceutical product, which perhaps in human history? This is a very controversial policy, but the role of Pfizer funding this outside support for the mandate hasn't been disclosed until now.
Speaker 1: There was a lot of joy that our people enjoyed because of the pride they took because we saved the world with the call. But you are proud to say to your neighbor, I work at 5.
Speaker 2: Today, the Texas attorney general's office claims COVID vaccine maker Pfizer misrepresented how effective the vaccine is.
Speaker 5: Yeah. They filed a lawsuit that could result in more than $10,000,000 in fines.
Speaker 2: The unprecedented move. Florida's surgeon general calling to halt the use of the mRNA COVID vaccine going against the FDA, citing safety concerns. Also saying there hasn't been enough clinical trials.
Speaker 5: The Kansas attorney general is now suing Pfizer for what he says are misleading claims the company made about its COVID 19 vaccine. Chris Kobach accuses the
Speaker 1: pharmaceutical company of lying when it called its
Speaker 5: vaccine safe and effective. Pharmaceutical company of lying when it called its vaccine safe and effective. He cites reported risks of causing specific heart conditions and pregnancy issues. He also claims Pfizer lied about the vaccine's effectiveness in the long term and against COVID variants.
Speaker 1: We have a successful vaccine. Resulted in a success, and this success looks like the biggest scientific breakthrough of the last 100 years.
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
Why on earth is Pfizer CEO @albertbourla not in custody yet? https://t.co/p6ZnuTiAbF
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across alarming news about a study revealing that all tested Pfizer COVID vaccine batches contained arsenic levels surpassing the EPA's safe drinking water limit. This contamination raises serious public health concerns and calls for immediate action from federal authorities to investigate and potentially withdraw these products. Arsenic is highly toxic and poses significant health risks, affecting various organ systems. This issue deserves widespread attention and urgent intervention.
@PeterSweden7 - PeterSweden
BREAKING: New study found that all Pfizer covid vaccine batches they tested had ARSENIC in them. What's more is that the arsenic levels exceeded the safe exposure limit for drinking water set by the EPA in the USA. This discovery should be all over the news.
@PeterSweden7 - PeterSweden
@McCulloughFund - McCullough Foundation
All tested Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine batches contained arsenic levels exceeding the safe exposure limit for drinking water, which is set at 10 µg/L by the U.S. EPA. This contamination demands immediate intervention from federal authorities to protect public health and investigate contamination of other vaccine batches. Injectable products containing toxic levels of heavy metals pose significant health risks and should be promptly withdrawn from the market. Arsenic is a highly toxic element with no essential physiological role in humans. It causes damage to all organ systems through mechanisms such as metabolic inhibition, oxidative stress, genotoxicity, and epigenetic alterations, including microRNA-dependent regulation: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10565-022-09710-8 @CDCgov @US_FDA @FDArecalls @pfizer @NIH @RobertKennedyJr #MFScholar
Mechanistic understanding of the toxic effects of arsenic and warfare arsenicals on human health and environment - Cell Biology and Toxicology
Worldwide, more than 200 million people are estimated to be exposed to unsafe levels of arsenic. Chronic exposure to unsafe levels of gro
link.springer.com
@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch
🚨 #BREAKING: Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla INDICTED ⚠️ With all the news surrounding Bill Gates heading to trial, we may have missed the head of Pfizer also being named in the lawsuit. Both are being held responsible for lying to the public about the Covid vaccine. Two down. https://t.co/C6S8oWqnlP
@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill
Pfizer committed Crimes Against Humanity on Live TV. ARREST BILL GATES #MAHA https://t.co/LJU5hhdLOU
Video Transcript AI Summary
Good morning. This program is brought to you by Pfizer. CBS Healthwatch is sponsored by Pfizer. Anderson Cooper 360 is brought to you by Pfizer. ABC News Nightline is sponsored by Pfizer. Pfizer is making a difference. CNN Tonight is brought to you by Pfizer. Early Start is sponsored by Pfizer. Friday night on Erin Burnett OutFront is brought to you by Pfizer. This Week with George Stephanopoulos is sponsored by Pfizer. Today's countdown to the royal wedding is brought to you by Pfizer. A CBS Sports Update is sponsored by Pfizer. Meet the Press data download is brought to you by Pfizer. This portion of CBS This Morning is sponsored by Pfizer. We will discuss hidden sugars in the American family diet, also sponsored by Pfizer.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sponsored by Pfizer. Good morning. America is brought to you by Pfizer. CBS Healthwatch sponsored by Pfizer. Anderson Cooper 360, brought to you by Pfizer.
ABC News Nightline, brought to you by Pfizer. Pfizer, making a difference, brought to you by Pfizer. CNN tonight, brought to you by Pfizer. Early start, brought to you by Pfizer. Friday night on Aaron Burnett out front, brought to you by Pfizer.
This week with George Stephanopoulos is brought to you by Pfizer. No. Today's countdown to the royal wedding is brought to you by Pfizer. And now a CBS Sports Update brought to you by Pfizer. Meet the press data download brought to you by Pfizer.
This portion of CBS This Morning sponsored by Pfizer. On how to find the hidden sugars in the American family diet sponsored by Pfizer. This portion of CBS This Morning sponsored by
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation begins with a claim that all childhood vaccines will be mRNA-based. In response, a participant argues that these mRNA products are not true vaccines but genetic preparations that can harm both healthy and unhealthy cells due to their ability to replicate indefinitely. They express concerns about the long-term presence of these mRNA components in the body and suggest using Ivermectin to counteract potential effects. The participant also posits that mRNA vaccines could be a bioweapon aimed at depopulation, noting that many informed medical professionals and leaders refuse to take them.
@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”
ALL Childhood Vaccines will be MRNA 💉💀 https://t.co/YlqRRXoT7c
Video Transcript AI Summary
Every childhood vaccine will be mRNA, becoming gene therapies that alter genetics without re-approval. COVID vaccines were profitable data and experimentation tools, but the real danger is the continued genetic tinkering via mRNA integration into all vaccines. The speaker is now anti-vaxx and will not get any more vaccines for themselves or their family because all vaccines are being redesigned to include gene therapies, driven by profit.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Every childhood vaccine is gonna be mRNA. They're integrating it into every single one. So they're changing the childhood vaccines to something new. They won't go through re approval. They won't go through anything.
They'll just change them. And all of the childhood vaccines are gonna be gene therapies. So if you get your child a vaccine of any type, it's gonna be a gene therapy. It's gonna alter their genetics. That's the game.
That's where the money is. That's where this is going. People don't care. These guys don't care about the COVID vaccine because they've made their money off of it. They've gathered their data.
They've done their gene, therapy experimentation on the population. But the thing that's dangerous is that they're tinkering with your genes. And that's what they're gonna continue to do. They are now integrating mRNA into every vaccine out there. So you wanna talk anti vaxx?
Here's anti vaxx, do not get any of them. There will not be another needle put in my arm so help me God for vaccine if I have anything to say about it or my family. None, zero. Every one of these are now getting mRNA treatments, they're redeveloping them, redesigning them and all of them are going to include gene therapies. There's so much money in this
@cliffrhodes - Cliff Rhodes
Absolutely no more "vaccines" (trick word), as they are genetic preparations now, not actual vaccines that disappear rapidly, after having done their job. These genetic preparations are made with lipid nanoparticles that cross all cell membrane barriers, making spike proteins that kill good and bad cells alike, all over the entire body. They are a continuously and infinitely self-replicating mRNA cargo that goes everywhere, and the antigen produced could vary by a thousand fold. It is not something you want sticking around forever for your entire lifetime. So, no more, and take Ivermectin to block the spike proteins that are still forever hanging around and replicating, if you have already had one or two Covid-19 mRNA products. I actually think correctly that mRNA "vaccines" are really a depopulation bioweapon. It couldn't be anything else. Informed Doctors & Nurses, CDC, as well as most world leaders, refuse to take them.
@atbasedben - Based Ben
….why would anyone brag about being responsible for the abomination that is the Covid-19 vaccines. He’s so proud 😬✡️ https://t.co/k3tP8IrjXP
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that Jews were behind the creation of the COVID vaccines. Specifically, they state that Tal Zaks, an Israeli scientist, was the chief medical officer in charge of research and development for the Moderna vaccine. They add that Albert Bourla, a Greek Jew, is the CEO of Pfizer, and Mikhail Dolsten, a Jew from Sweden, is the chief scientist. The speaker concludes that both COVID vaccines were created by Jews.
Another speaker states they are 59 years old, in good health, and not working on the front lines, therefore vaccination is not recommended for them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Jews were behind the invention and creation of these COVID vaccines that are gonna save humanity now. The Moderna vaccine. Okay? The Moderna vaccine, the chief medical officer in charge of research and development. The person who was in charge of putting it all together is the Israeli scientist Tal Zaks.
Pfizer, who's the CEO of Pfizer? Now we're the person who heads the company. Albert Bourla, who is a Greek Jew. And then who is the chief scientist? Chief scientist is Mikhail Dolsten, a Jew from Sweden.
Both both COVID vaccines that are now gonna rescue humanity. Both were created by Jews.
Speaker 1: Fifty nine years old in good health. I'm not working in the front line. So my type is not recommended to get vaccination. My type is not recommended to get vaccination.
@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly
🚨Woody Harrelson: What if RFK Jr. was right about the "rushed COVID vaccines?" https://t.co/3E7WS4HkPr
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker, identifying as a left-leaning hippie Texan, questions the criticism Bobby Kennedy Jr. received for encouraging skepticism about the rushed COVID vaccines. The speaker wonders if Kennedy was right.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As a left leaning hippie Texan, maybe it is in my nature to be somewhat rebellious, but, I can't help but wonder, in spite of all of the criticism Bobby Kennedy Jr. Received for encouraging us to be somewhat skeptical about these rushed COVID vaccines, what if he was right?
@JohnWillia90228 - John Williams
@DiedSuddenly_ Check this out https://t.co/jSdw2g4Cqa
@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly
🚨Woody Harrelson: What if RFK Jr. was right about the "rushed COVID vaccines?" https://t.co/3E7WS4HkPr
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker, identifying as a left-leaning hippie Texan, questions the criticism Bobby Kennedy Jr. received for encouraging skepticism about the rushed COVID vaccines. The speaker wonders if Kennedy was right.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As a left leaning hippie Texan, maybe it is in my nature to be somewhat rebellious, but, I can't help but wonder, in spite of all of the criticism Bobby Kennedy Jr. Received for encouraging us to be somewhat skeptical about these rushed COVID vaccines, what if he was right?
@redpilldispensr - Red Pill Dispenser
Wait, what did Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla just tell the World Economic Forum? 😲 https://t.co/OQ4YFOIBI3
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that an individual had a goal to reduce the world's population by fifty percent by 2023, and that this goal is becoming reality. They describe a biological chip within a tablet that, upon dissolving in the stomach, sends a signal confirming the tablet was taken. The speaker suggests this technology has applications for insurance companies to monitor patient compliance with medication.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Goals for the next five years. And one of them was by 2023, we will reduce the number of people in the world by fifty percent. I think today, his dream is becoming reality. It is basically biological ship that it is in the tablet and once you take the tablet and dissolves into your stomach, send a signal that you took the tablet. So imagine the applications of that compliance.
The insurance companies to know that the medicines that patients should take, they do take them. It is fascinating what happens.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Who makes ivermectin? Same companies as the boosters. 👇suppressing symptoms like always https://t.co/uYeB5Y0gz5
Video Transcript AI Summary
Rockefellers own the medical system and produce ivermectin with all their companies, trickling it down to others and selling in other countries—it's the same thing. It's a monopoly; we literally live in the game monopoly. After posting ivermectin-toxicity, viewers asked who I'm paid by, but the speaker says it's a pharmaceutical product and they are not paid by anybody. They caution that if you're still using pharmaceuticals after 2020, you should check yourself, referencing mask-wearing and sticker policies as part of what happened. Vitamins are described as synthetic, fake, and made in a lab, and peptides as made in a lab. The speaker concludes: Eat from food. That's what we're supposed to do.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I was talking last time about ivermectin. Well, since the Rockefellers own the medical system and they're the top dog up here and they produce the ivermectin with all their companies, which you can look into that, then what they do is they trickle them down to other companies and then they sell them in other countries. So people are like, well, well, I buy it in a different country. Guess what? It's the same thing.
It's a monopoly. That's the thing. If we don't understand that these things are monopolies and that we literally live in the game monopoly, then we're just blinded. Then it's funny because I put up that video of ivermectin toxicity and people were going nuts. They were like, who who who are you paid by?
And who how dare you tell people this? It's like, it's it's a pharmaceutical product. I'm not paid by anybody. It's literally just a pharmaceutical product. Like, if you're still using pharmaceuticals after 2020, you gotta check yourself.
That's that's that's all I'm gonna say. Because after 2020, like, after you went through all of the things that we all went through with stepping on stickers and you people telling people to wear masks, then you gotta check yourself. That's all I'm gonna say. Vitamins, same thing, synthetic, fake, and made in a lab. And same with peptides, made in a lab.
Eat from food. That's what we're supposed to do.
@RedactedNews - Redacted
Did you catch this earlier?! 💉 The Pfizer CEO was forced to testify and admit that he knew the shot was poison from day one! ...Nothing to see here... https://t.co/L5dvsj8Dxb
Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion centers on a Dutch civil litigation in which Bill Gates, Albert Bourla, and Marc Rutemp (Marc Rutza) are named as individual defendants in cases linked to “Project COVID” and broad pandemic preparedness efforts years before the 2020 pandemic.
Key facts asserted:
- The defendants are plaintiffs in civil tort litigation filed in the Netherlands around 2023. Two cases exist: an older 2023 case and a second case involving additional plaintiffs. The Dutch approach allows individuals to be named as defendants in civil tort actions.
- Gates and Bourla (and Rutza) have appeared as defendants; Gates attempted to avoid jurisdiction, but the Amsterdam court ruled that Gates and Bourla, as individuals, respond to the case. They have not appeared in court personally, but their lawyers appear on their behalf.
- On March 9, an appeal hearing occurred in Amsterdam at the Court of Appeals, with extensive public attendance (about 60 journalists, podcasters, and plaintiffs). The hearing was described as explosive; a single attorney, Peter Stassen, presented a long argument as co-counsel had been imprisoned and disbarred, leaving one attorney on a tight budget. A video of the proceedings and a standout speech went viral.
- The plaintiffs allege the defendants conspired to create “Project COVID” and a “pandemic preparedness racket” years prior to 2020. The core claim is that Gates, Bourla, Rutza, along with others, collaborated with private NGOs, the military, NATO, and DOD through a DARPA-linked pandemic program to identify pandemic potential viruses and to develop vaccines and therapeutics within sixty days, with funding from the DOD.
- Evidence cited includes a 2017 AstraZeneca tape in which a key AstraZeneca executive states that DARPA approached them in 2017 to join a consortium to identify pandemic viruses and deliver vaccines within sixty days; the response was, “I thought it was science fiction.” The tape is part of an evidence package showing pre-2020 planning.
- February 4, 2020 is highlighted as a crucial date: a telephone call from DARPA indicating COVID was declared a national security threat, followed by retroactive emergency declarations around March 2020. A February 4, 2020 conference was scheduled, with widespread communications among government, military, HHS, and CDC; the aim was to secure liability protection for pharmaceutical countermeasures during a declared emergency.
- The defense includes the assertion that the public-private partnership extended to many companies (including 300 others) that joined the consortium, with U.S. and European regulatory synchronization through mutual recognition agreements.
- The alleged motives are primarily framed as profits and control, with references to a long-standing history of military involvement in vaccine development and public health measures, including the PREP Act in the U.S. and parallel European countermeasures frameworks that waive liability and regulatory requirements during declared emergencies. The PREP Act’s role — especially in the U.S. — is discussed as shielding manufacturers from liability, with European frameworks described as allowing similar protections through contracts and synchronized countermeasures legislation.
- Expert testimonies: five experts have provided evidence supporting foreknowledge and intentional deception by government health officials and the named defendants. Sasha Ladopova and Catherine Watt contributed written testimonies; Ladopova references foreknowledge by health regulators, and the broader regulatory harmonization across EMA and FDA.
- Francis Boyle, a professor known for work on bioweapons law, testified that the vaccines/metas could be viewed as bioweapons; he died three weeks after agreeing to testify.
- Injuries to plaintiffs: in the initial case, seven injured plaintiffs with one death; the second case added three more plaintiffs. Injuries cited include cardiovascular inflammation, autoimmune conditions, and cancer; plaintiffs contend their lives were destroyed by the countermeasures, while regulators and manufacturers allegedly denied injuries and deaths.
What happens next:
- An October 22 hearing in the lower court in Lewarden (The Netherlands) is planned, with a public in-person event and a press conference.
- The appeal on the second case seeks to have expert witnesses heard under oath; the prior lower court denied this, and the higher court’s decision is anticipated (with expectations of denial, according to the interview).
- The campaign invites public interest and financial support; the foundation in the Netherlands funds the case, and the English-language YouTube channel is available for updates and evidence.
Contact points for following the case include Sasha Ladopova’s Substack and the Dutch foundation’s YouTube channel and materials.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, this could be one of the biggest bombshell civil pieces of litigation. And what does Bill Gates, Albert Borla, Marc Ruta all have in common? Well, civil litigation related to COVID in The Netherlands. And what does this case mean moving forward to try to get answers for the rest of the world. And all of this is tied to maybe the COVID emergency measures, which did not begin in 2020 at all, but were actually put in place years earlier inside of a Pentagon backed pandemic program that was built for speed.
Like, we gotta get this thing rolled out here. It all appeared to the world as if this thing came out of nowhere, but it didn't. And that's the explosive question being raised by newly published material from Sasha Ladopova, who centered on leaked internal AstraZeneca audio that she says points back to a Pentagon planned DARPA linked pandemic program dating back to the year 2017. In other words, major players inside the government, big pharma, were already treating it as a national security operation years before most Americans or people living around the world even understood what was happening. Sasha Ladopova worked at the highest levels of big pharma as a medical device R and D executive, and now she spends her time exposing fraud and lies inside the pharmaceutical industry as a journalist and researcher.
And Sasha joins us now. Great to have you back on the show. It's been a number of years, but thank you for your latest work on this. Great to see you.
Speaker 1: Hi, Clayton. Thank you for inviting me again. And, yes, great to see you again. Thank you.
Speaker 0: Thank you. So let's start with The Netherlands. Albert Borla, Bill Gates, Marc Ruta. Of course, I love how, like, people like Marc Ruta who fail in life get promoted to the head of NATO. That's how these things work.
Right? So what do the three of them have in common, and why are they being forced to appear before a court in Amsterdam related to COVID? Can you walk us through this?
Speaker 1: Right. So so they are all, defendants in this civil litigation procedure that started around 2023. And there are two cases, an older case was filed in 2023. These individuals, including several other high level Dutch state officials who all participated in project COVID, are named as defendants, as individuals. And that's a unique feature of Dutch law where individuals can be brought like this into the civil tort litigation.
And so, they all they tried to get out of this case. Bill Gates tried to claim that he is not subject to this jurisdiction, but the judge actually ruled that Bill Gates and Obi Berla as individuals respond to this case. They haven't appeared individually in court, but their lawyers are present and their lawyers are responding on their behalf, so they're part of the defendant group in this litigation. So, on March 9, yes, so we were in Amsterdam at the Court of Appeals. I was there in person.
So, was another expert witness, Johsson Song. And also about 60 journalists, podcasters and members of the public and plaintiffs showed up with us in the Court of Appeals. And in fact, there were so many people on the plaintiff's side that the court had to give us two rooms because one wasn't big enough. And so that proceeding was very explosive. There's a video of it.
We've subtitled it, translated it. I made the all the materials available where Peter Stassen, who is the only attorney prosecuting this case now, the the his co counsel was imprisoned and disbarred. So now we're we're down to one attorney on a shoestring budget. So he made an amazing speech. It went viral for a few days on Twitter.
And so it's available on YouTube. And and he laid out the case. He laid out that these these people all conspired to create project COVID, to create create this pandemic preparedness racket years ahead. Yes. Years years ahead of 2020.
And Bill Gates is a key participant in it. And, you know, they were all profiteers trying to set up this this fake pandemic and very real response by the governments, which they pulled off, and then profiteer off of it massively, which they did. And so, the plaintiffs are injured individuals by Pfizer vaccine, and they're seeking justice and compensation for their injuries. So, that's kind of in a nutshell. We're expecting the Court of Appeals decision on April 9, we also have now scheduled a court hearing on substantive matter finally on October 22 in lower court in The Netherlands in Lewawarden.
And I'm going to be there in person again, we're going to have a public event there again.
Speaker 0: So can you talk about how Bill Gates and Pfizer, Albert Borla conspired? Because that's the argument from the prosecution and from the plaintiffs that Bill Gates, Albert Borla, Mark Ruta, they got together and conspired to create what they're calling Project COVID. Maybe you can walk us through the machinery of that.
Speaker 1: Right. Exactly. So I had a lot of, I would say, indirect but documented very well documented evidence that private NGOs like Bill Gates, the military, NATO, and DOD. Obviously, this was all centered around DOD massively, DARPA, which is DOD's Advanced Research Project Agency. Pharmaceutical companies who were part of this consortium were approached by DARPA in around well, beginning as early as 2012, but I have very, very direct evidence, as you mentioned, the tape from AstraZeneca, that in 2017, DARPA specifically approached AstraZeneca and said that to these key executives and said that, oh, we can fund this project where and you can be part of this consortium.
The consortium is already conspiracy, essentially. You can be part of this consortium where we, the DOD, the military, identify pandemic potential viruses, not very clear how, and you, the pharma, will be making vaccines and therapeutics within sixty days of that, To which the response, and I have it on tape from key executive of AstraZeneca was I thought it was science fiction. And that's the truth. So he is admitting that he knew at the time this was fake and they were fraudulently being induced into this activity. But of course, you know, this is the US government, the DOD telling them that and waving a lot of dollars.
So they, you know, of course, they said yes. And of course, another 300 companies in this consortium said yes. And they all got together and they started working on these projects where DoD was funding these science exercise, no deliverables, lots of money, what's not to like. So they've been doing this for a few years prior to 2020. And in 2020, DoD made a phone call on February 4 to AstraZeneca and other participants of consortium telling them that COVID is declared national security threat.
Again, not clear why. We still don't know why. That hasn't been unclassified. Nobody has any evidence of what how the decision was made, who decided based on what data. And, they just all went live, live exercise, and, all over the world in synchronous in perfect synchronicity.
So while I thought that you know, I do have this evidence, but it's very you know, it's hard to prove that, you know, Bill Gates specifically was, you know, very, very key to this. Now, you know and I never expected Bill Gates would put this in writing that I would like to do this project COVID, but she did with in the emails with Epstein. So when the emails with Epstein files were released, it's evident that Bill Gates, Epstein, and JPMorgan, the bank, were setting up a financial structure to do exactly this to prepare for pandemics and profit off it and also utilize Bill Gates' or not not trigger the the for profit status of this activity by utilizing the charitable structures and how to avoid taxation and all that. So they were not only structuring pandemic project, they were also figuring out how to avoid taxes and how to profit of it massively.
Speaker 0: And this was really at the request of the DOD, the Pentagon. Yes. They were specifically asking to create this did they call it project COVID? Did they what kind of military they love to give military names and operations. What was the name?
Speaker 1: So the the name was a pandemic preparedness so PPP, pandemic preparedness program or something like that. And, you know, it was loosely called that. There were also other names given to other activities like, countermeasures. At some point within the Epstein exchange with Bill Gates, there are names like Project Molecule being thrown around. So they do give them different names.
But overall, this is all it's a public private partnership which is, again a conspiracy between corporations, banks, pharmaceutical companies, government, military, it's public private partnership, to create these pandemic preparedness planning activities, military countermeasures activities all over the world. And also, there's extensive documentation evidence and evidence in law how all of this was over these decades synchronized across the world, especially key military allies like, you know, NATO, the five eyes security allies, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, they all have the same analogous law, to The US law that enables all this activity and makes it all legal.
Speaker 0: Well, it's no secret Americans love sushi, my daughters included. And over the last two decades, raw fish consumption has exploded. Sushi bars everywhere, grocery stores selling it, gas stations selling. Millions of people now eat raw fish weekly, but here's a hidden risk most people never think about. Parasites.
Yeah. Salmon, one of the most popular fish worldwide, but it naturally contains more than 70 parasites. Most of them are tiny, nearly impossible to see them. I'm sure you've seen the videos where people have gone to, like, Costco and they come home and let their salmon sit out on the counter for a few hours and suddenly the little white parasites start popping out of the fish. But once inside the body, parasites can hide for years while frequently laying eggs before any symptoms appear at all in the body.
That's why many physicians are raising awareness about parasite exposure. Our friend of the show, Doctor. Peter McCullough, recommends doing a parasite cleanse at least once a year as a preventative measure. The wellness company offers a hard to access Rx Parasite Cleanse, USA compound with ivermectin and mebenzadol. Ivermectin paralyzes the parasite's nervous system, and then mebenzadol starves them.
Each capsule contains twenty five mg of ivermectin, two hundred and fifty milligrams of mebenzadol lab tested for quality. You can now get a more budget friendly forty five capsule option that costs $250 less, giving you two twenty one day parasite cleanse cycles. It's the same formula as the original, just a smaller quantity. So head right now to twc.health/redacted and use that code redacted to save $35 off plus free shipping. And so the I I guess I'm looking for the motive here.
Right?
Speaker 1: Mhmm.
Speaker 0: Is it purely money, or was it control? I mean, the way I see it now is it's all about control. It was a it was, you know, them telling us, you know, cash cash has COVID on it. You can't touch paper money, the lockdowns, control, all of it. So was it or in in these documents, in this research, did you find the clear motive from the DOD and Pentagon?
Speaker 1: So they never you know, they don't state the clear motive, but this is a very long, long running history. So it actually goes back about 100 years at least. There the you know, people need to understand that public health and especially vaccination mass vaccination programs are part of long running Eugenics Agenda, and they have always been a military activity. So, The US before mass vaccination programs, before they put on the books in the 80s the National Vaccine Injury Law, These activities from early nineteen hundreds and especially during the second world war and immediately after the second world war when The US had official bioweapons development program. It was covert, but it was legal, ran until Nixon stopped it in '69.
So, during that time especially, all vaccines were military owned and developed and co developed. Always. There was always military involvement in development of all vaccines. The polio vaccines, everything else that was developed at the time, all science and all pharmaceutical development is tightly linked with military. So they already had the public health military public private partnership.
In fact, there was an official pharmaceutical bioweapons consortium at the time. It was headed by Merck, by George Merck, Merck Pharmaceuticals. He was the civilian head of The US bioweapons development program. And their main activity was making vaccines. And there's even Merck report declassified describing this.
And also about 80 academic institutions were at the time participating in the same program. So, this is a very very long standing activity that simply evolved. And the key evolution is not what they were doing on the medical or vaccine making side, but what they were doing on the legislative side to remove liability. Because every time they would try to push their products into the public, there would be a lot of injuries and deaths, and there would be a huge scandal. And they would have to cover up the scandal and pay the liabilities and so forth.
And that evolved into the PREP Act. So, PREP Act is the final, I would say, you know, activity that you can say here's a very, very clear evidence of intent of them doing this and importantly getting away with this without any justice, accountability or liability. And people are saying, well, how can you say that? But, you know, lawmaking is highly intentional set of activities. So you can't say they didn't have intent somehow accidentally this law appeared on the books.
And in fact, there is a congressional debate when the PREP Act was being introduced in 2005 where Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden both stood up in Congress and said this law is hugely unconstitutional. It should not be passed because it violates several amendments of the constitution, specifically people's right to sue in court and seek compensation for injuries and deaths caused by government activities. So how can you say that they didn't know, it wasn't intentional, that there was no nobody brought up any objections to it? And the Republicans in Congress at the time pushed it through. So now we have this high it is monstrous monstrous prep act law that says that the government can declare a pandemic unilateral HHS secretary, RFK junior, today.
It's in his opinion, his opinion that we have a COVID pandemic, that it will last until 2029 at least. So, a decade of emergency, military emergency. And once that declaration is out and HHS secretary signs off on it, then all these products, the COVID countermeasures can be shipped completely without any regulation, not following any good manufacturing practices, not following any safety efficacy assessments. FDA cannot even issue legally safe and efficacious labeling for these products. So, all these announcements are just marketing slogans.
And there's absolutely no liability whatsoever for any injuries or deaths caused by the countermeasures under this declaration. So that's what we have right now. And that's the law itself is the evidence of a massive conspiracy between the private sector and the government to do this, to hurt, to injure the population, and to cause all this damage that they have caused.
Speaker 0: When in this court hearing, and I guess we'll have to unpack like what was actually said, what evidence was presented that showed that the defendants, Bill Gates, Albert Bourla, Mark Rutza, knew that these vaccinations were not real, and if anything, they were causing pain, they were causing enormous problems, massive side effects, etcetera?
Speaker 1: Right. So the so to date so we have five expert witnesses to provide evidence that would support these these statements. And I'm one of the expert witnesses. Two of us, so myself and Catherine Watt, who's doing the law research, we already submitted our written testimonies as part of the court documents, as part of the appeal procedure. And my own testimony contains a lot of evidence of, yes, the foreknowledge and so the the government officials and and Albert Berlo and Bill Gates, so people people who are the defendants, they are under the status of they knew or should have known.
So these are the things that the government officials in health so, for example, when the the health regulators in The Netherlands are taking these shots and telling to the public in public advertisements, TV, media that these are safe and effective. These are life saving vaccines. You must take them. You must they will prevent transmission, and we will stop the pandemic and all that. These statements cannot be just made, you know, because, you know, they can't lie.
Speaker 0: Right. Like, is it like, what is that based in?
Speaker 1: Right. So it needs to be based on the legal standard for safety and efficacy. And the legal standard for safety and efficacy exists both in Europe under EMA standards and European Medicines Agency, and which is equivalent to the US FDA. Because they are now synchronized, they're all harmonized, The US and European regulators and Canadians and Japanese and all the Western world, they've also synchronized themselves through international conference on harmonization. So, the regulatory frameworks are largely the same.
So, they and they also have mutual recognition agreements. So, now they can take statements from the FDA as if it's EMA issued those statements because they believe they're both equivalent. And then EMA can turn around and tell the public, yes, this is safe and effective. So, my evidence that FDA, through PREPACT, cannot even legally issue those statements. Then EMA, with their high powered attorneys and researchers and regulatory experts, thousands of staff should have known this.
If I, like average person working in the pharmaceutical industry, was able to find this information very easily, Well, they should have known this. They should have known that FDA cannot say safe and effective and they're issuing them under Emergency Use Authorization Framework, which is a countermeasures framework, which absolves, which removes any regulatory requirements from pharma, removes informed consent, removes You can't even run a clinical trial on the EUA product. It's not possible legally to do. All of this is known. All of this is written into the law and the European regulators know it very well.
And the European health authorities, those individuals in charge, even if they didn't know, they should have known, they should have checked before they made those statements to the public. So, because none of this happened and it wasn't just like one instance or one example where they missed some information because they were in a hurry. No, we have a systematic evidence of all of them lying to the public in concert and denying all the injuries and deaths. So therefore, it's a very clear statement that they are actually guilty of conspiracy.
Speaker 0: So they knew of the event they knew of the adverse offense. They were actively lying about it. Mhmm. And then you also believe that they were covering it up. Right?
Did you see evidence?
Speaker 1: Of course. They they to date, they're all they're all covering it up. In in The US, they're covering it up, and in the Europe, they're covering it. They they are they're denying injuries. They're denying that these vaccines cause deaths and cancer and all those horrible things.
And they're just they're basically stonewalling. And they're not even responding on the substance. What was interesting in the in the appeal proceeding, we had one lawyer on the Schusteren budget for the plaintiffs, nine defense attorneys in the room on behalf of the defendants. And in this appeal in the court of appeals of Amsterdam, it was expected because, again, this is a civil procedure. It's not a criminal procedure.
It's expected that the defense will say something. So Peter Stassen talked for an hour about, presenting all this evidence. They sat there in the room. Their only response was one of the attorneys spoke and said, COVID was a real illness, and vaccines are safe and effective.
Speaker 0: That's all they said.
Speaker 1: Was it, yeah.
Speaker 0: You talk about these defendants who brought this civil case, can you maybe walk through some of their injuries, what they experienced?
Speaker 1: Well, have, so in the earlier case, were seven injured plaintiffs. One person already died from their injuries. And they have a variety of injuries from cardiovascular, you know, the cardiac inflammation, people get autoimmune conditions, some have cancer, I believe. And in the second case, we had two we had three additional plaintiffs. Two of them were in the room on March 9, and one was too sick to attend.
So all of these people are severely injured. They can't they're unable to work the government. Okay. In The Netherlands, maybe there's more social social welfare type of deal, but still, you know, people people's lives are destroyed by these things, and the government can continues to deny it. So that's that's monstrous.
Speaker 0: Did and Bill Gates has really shifted his position on this, which seems to me problematic. Mhmm. You know, when did he enough to make a lot of money off of it and then shift your position later in interviews. Mhmm. Is that an important piece for this this hearing, this trial?
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, he shifts his constituents all the time.
Speaker 0: Right. So,
Speaker 1: yes, he's clearly getting in some sort of a pickle, especially after the Epstein files came out, clearly showing that he he was conspiring and showing other, you know, kind of sordid stuff that he did with with Epstein. Even I thought, recently, there was news that Warren Buffett is no longer investing into the his charitable scams. And so, that's a big that's a big ticket. It's something like $4,000,000,000. So, obviously, Bill Gates is getting into some sort of a situation.
And, yeah, he he will shift all the time, but he is always he's always behind the the vaccine push. Actually, in my recent article, I found that before even the COVID vaccines went on the market, these COVID countermeasures were pushed globally in December 2020. In November 2020, they very quietly pushed globally a new oral polio vaccine which is known and very well documented in scientific literature that it's the only source of polio today. So they have reformulated the polio vaccine including Bill Gates, Gavi and other, you know, usual usual usual players in this, they have reformulated it and pushed it under a countermeasure for under under WHO countermeasure framework, which is called emergency use listing, and they pushed it globally into 40 countries of the world.
Speaker 0: We have this immunity as you talked about here in The United States for these pharmaceutical companies going back to the 1980s, of course. There's been moves to try to get that removed in The US. I don't think there's any chance of it happening, but maybe that gives them, you know, gives them protection, gives them immunity so that no one can really sue them for that. What laws are in place in The Netherlands where this case was brought that they they're not offered that same protection or are they?
Speaker 1: Yeah. So so in The US, we have the PREP Act, which is the most monstrous piece of legislation. And I had several discussions with RFK junior about this, and and he knows that he can just write a memo and remove that declaration, and this goes away. Liability goes away.
Speaker 0: By the way, he's talked about this. Mean, he's Talked about he ever became HHS.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Before before the HHS secretary, it was his you know, almost his campaign slogan. I mean, he was he was running on this agenda. After he became HHS secretary, he forgot. He forgot that he can write a a two sentence memo in the federal register.
So anyhow, so we have this prepacked monstrosity in The US. In other parts of parts of the world, including Europe, they don't have that. But in Europe, they've made a synthetic version of it. I've written how I've written articles about exactly how they're doing it. So in Europe, they have a lot of the legislation around countermeasures, as I said, synchronized over time in preparation for this.
And that legislation says if there is an emergency declaration, then we can arbitrarily we, the regulators, arbitrarily waive certain parts of compliance, good manufacturing practices, distribution practices, import export laws, and they just decided to waive it all summarily. But then also through the contracts that Pfizer and Ursula von der Leyen, remember Albert Berle and Ursula von der Leyen, by text messages negotiated for the entire EU. They these contracts had clauses, and they were redacted for a very long time, and I think they're still not unredacted completely. But there were clauses that forced all the national governments to waive their liability laws for manufacturers. So that part about the liability that's in the prep act automatically was just, contractually forced onto the, national governments, in Europe.
And that's and that's why Albert Burle is an important defendant because we also have emails, some emails showing that he was booing the FDA, lying to them, lying to the EMA, during the the the, you know, the last phase of approvals. And, of course, we know that he was negotiating with Ursula.
Speaker 0: Right, and to provide enough vaccines, I think was it two or three doses per EU resident, so the amount of money the boondoggle was substantial.
Speaker 1: Yeah, initially two to three, but they ultimately went with 10 or something like that. Yeah.
Speaker 0: So, yeah, every EU citizen needs 10 of these, and that's how much money was changed. So this was all, of course, a massive money laundering operation. Can you talk about walk us through 02/04/2020? Because in the beginning, I talked about this 2017 timeline, right, where they were actively participating in this idea of emergency use authorization, this pandemic preparedness program. So 02/04/2020, why is that date so important in your view?
How do you connect the alleged Defense Department call to the government's declarations that were made effective on that very same day?
Speaker 1: Mhmm. Yeah. So first, you know, initially, I didn't know about the importance of February 4. I I I kind of flagged it in my mind because when the when the government first issued the declaration of emergency, it was issued, I believe, on March 03/13/2020, but it was re made retroactive to February 4. And so it was weird.
You know? Why making it retroactive? But then I received this tape from AstraZeneca. The tape is a Zoom, meeting, internal Zoom meeting in AstraZeneca. I have the video portion.
I just never released the video. It doesn't
Speaker 0: I should point out. I'll I'll link it up to your Substack page because you have it in the Substack article, if people wanna watch the video and you can listen to the audio of the AstraZeneca meeting, it's it's it's it's crazy. But go ahead. Yeah.
Speaker 1: So the the meeting was so I have about six minutes clip of it. And the meeting was at the 2020 when they were celebrating approval of monoclonal antibody in The US. They didn't get the vaccine approved, but they got the monoclonal antibody approved. And that as part of the you know, them high fiving each other, there's a discussion between their CEO, Pascal Surot, and Mark Esser, VP of monoclonal antibodies. And he says Mark Esser, he says, well, we received a phone call on February 4 from DARPA.
And actually, the person who called, I believe, was colonel Matt Habburn. I've written about him extensively. He was very key player in the pandemic preparedness activities and all structuring this consortium. So market market assessors DARPA called us, and it wasn't a surprise to us because we've already been in this consortium since 2017. But they called us and said that COVID was declared national security threat.
So we also have emails, a massive email file. So with the list of email participants, two to three pages long. So hundreds, hundreds of people, internal government, military, HHS, CDC, all going out on February 4, scheduling a conference, but the the content of it is redacted. So we know there was a massive communication happening on February 4 because that's when DARPA decided to go ahead and engage the private sector in this activity to, you know, to declare, now we're going. This exercise is is going.
And with that declaration, they wanted to start the liability protection from that declaration because if they didn't, then pharma is exposed for a couple of weeks. Alright? So so when Trump was you know, it's not clear whether Trump was in in on the deal from the beginning or he was somehow, you know, managed to to be brought on board. We know Tucker Carlson went to Mar A Lago around the same time in March and probably was key to convincing Trump to to go ahead with this. So once they wrangled Trump to issue the declaration on March 13, they said, well, we need to cover pharma because they've been already, you know, deal deal already told them go.
We need to cover them for these few weeks, and so we will retroactively make it February 4. So February 4 is a very, very key date. It needs to be investigated.
Speaker 0: Yeah. No. That's a great point. And I you know, we we hear about, I think, March 11, March 13, March 11. We just did a deep dive, on on March 11 and, of course, the, you know, the announcement of the pandemic, I believe.
I think it was 03/11, if I'm not mistaken. Mhmm. But also your story we talked about this, but covers you know, starts in 2017, Matt Hepburn, DARPA's pandemic prevention platform. So what do you believe was actually being built under that program? Like, how far along was it before the public ever heard the word COVID?
Because, you know, like, what sort of scaffolding was being built as far back as 2017?
Speaker 1: Yeah. So so that whole activity was called pan they gave kind of a pan influenza name to it, and they said, well, generally speaking, it's gonna we're going to be, you know, dealing with respiratory pandemics. So they they gave kind of a vague target to the pharma companies and and said, we will be and and then started soliciting proposals expansion of biomanufacturing facilities in a particular for a particular platform, like this LNP and mRNA type of stuff. By the way, biomanufacturing is highly specialized, and it's very difficult. I I used to do modeling, you know, financial modeling for pharma companies in in this sector, like, you know, how do you decide to invest in the biomanufacturing while you're still in clinical trials?
It's very, very difficult because the investments are huge. You have to commit way before you know that you have a product and you don't have safety problems. So this is very complicated. You can't just say, oh, you know, it's totally fine. We can scale the manufacturing before we even complete clinical trials.
This is nonsense. But this is clearly written into DARPA and BARDA PowerPoints. So there's huge documentation around that they were making these these statements that this is totally okay to do. And, well, of course, if you have unlimited government budget, maybe that's okay to do, but scientifically not. And and if you're concerned with safety, absolutely not.
And so they so that's that's what they were doing. They were just soliciting proposals, engaging pharma and academia in building up many huge manufacturing base and being able to quickly brew these concoctions without any regard to safety. Because they knew they're they're poison, and they knew they're making poison, and they didn't care. They just wanted to scale it, make it huge, and be ready to go in a moment, which
Speaker 0: they Did they know did they know at the time and they know this was poison. But did they know then that they would have the protection, the umbrella protection of emergency use authorization, therefore they don't even have to worry about trials?
Speaker 1: Absolutely.
Speaker 0: They were aware from the beginning that they could create this poison.
Speaker 1: Exactly. So, there is another set of documentation, which was called legal preparedness by the FDA. So, the FDA legal counsel themselves have made numerous presentations. I have a gigantic file of them going back, same PowerPoint they were presenting every year to this consortium of companies. They're just, you know, evolving it a bit, but it goes back to about 2012.
The most in the most recent versions, they have slides that say, this is the law, you know, explaining this whole framework of countermeasures to the consortium participants because pharmas are are like, well, I don't wanna do this if unless I have a full protection. So this is FDA going to pharma and telling them, don't worry. There's a whole new section of FDA Food and Drugs and Cosmetics Act which we put in. It's called section five six four, which deals this with medical countermeasures. And in fact, in the PowerPoint slide, they said, if we didn't have this section, we would have violated Food and Drugs and Cosmetics Act by doing this.
Speaker 0: So they just added that section and to give them this additional protection?
Speaker 1: Just to take so say, you know, this section specifically says, if HHS declares pandemic emergency, then food and drugs and cosmetics app does not apply.
Speaker 0: Does not apply.
Speaker 1: Literally what it says.
Speaker 0: So they, I mean, they were really pushing them in a big, big way. I mean, was, like, the government really pushing them. Like, hey. We're gonna and by the way, they even thought through the questions you might ask from a legal perspective. Like, we'll provide the framework.
I know you might come back and be worried about this. Don't worry, we've got you covered.
Speaker 1: Yes, absolutely. And I know how pharma companies executives think. So every executive always has a a crew of lawyers around them because they need to have a legal protection from from knowing something bad. Okay? From even knowing something bad.
He and and, of course, the pharma companies are always, you know, you want me to do this? Well, what's my protection? And that's the dialogue that went for about a decade to convince farmers that it's gonna be all okay.
Speaker 0: So these discussions, Bill Gates, Albert Bourla, etcetera, is that all part of this? So those early discussions, even back in 2017, is that part of this Netherlands case?
Speaker 1: The so I have in my testimony, I I do go back to the 2017. I have the AstraZeneca tape and evidence and on, you know, the law that I've discussed, removal of all the pharmaceutical regulations because, again, as I said, through the mutual recognition agreement, it's highly relevant for the for the European Union. And government officials should have known and of course they did know. And so that's that's yes. That's part of of the evidence package.
And that's why my testimony essentially boils down to the statement 60 pages long and 200 megabytes of attachments. But it boils down to to single single very simple statement that these injections are indistinguishable from biochemical weapons because they're poisons. They're poisons, technically poisons, scientifically poisons, medically poisons, legally and forensically. In any way you look at it, it's a poison.
Speaker 0: So there's no gray area. Like, these are like a biological weapon.
Speaker 1: Yeah. They are biological weapons. And and in fact, we had the sixth witness, Francis Boyle, professor, Francis Boyle, who was law professor who was who has written biological weapons convention law and related laws. And he was willing to testify that these products are bioweapons and that they fit the definition of the bioweapons under the convention. And three weeks after he agreed to testify, he suddenly died.
Speaker 0: Wow.
Speaker 1: So this was about a year ago.
Speaker 0: Of course. So where does this case go from here? I know we're waiting for this appeal now. Your testimony entered in, but where do things stand right now in The Netherlands with this case?
Speaker 1: So the appeal is for the second case with the three plaintiffs, and that was just to ask for us as witnesses expert witnesses to be heard in in court under oath, which was denied by the lower court. And so we went to the higher court. We expect it to be denied. But as I said, this is fine. We wanted to bring attention to the case and so that's why it was open.
We Peter Stassen was able to negotiate, you know, that the court would allow all the attendants that came in and the press event afterwards and to to publish to get attention to this case because we don't we want to send the message to the Dutch government and legal system, which is very, you know, I would say corrupt, just like everywhere in the world and beholden to the government. But we want to send a message that you can't just quietly squash it. Now we have a hearing date on October 22, and that's that's very important, and we will be making a lot of announcements. We'll be inviting press. Anybody is is welcome to come.
It's a it's a, again, public meeting, open to the public, and we will have a press conference after.
Speaker 0: Well, Sasha, thank you so much for your incredible work on this. Where can people learn more about your work and where this case goes from here?
Speaker 1: So my substack, I publish updates on it, and I publish several articles on it. You can find information on my Substack. There is a foundation. It's called Foundation in The Netherlands that's funding this case, and they have a YouTube channel. It's also available on my Substack.
I I'll send you the link to that channel for for the show, and that's in English. So that YouTube channel has a lot of material in English, and people are, you know, absolutely welcome to help support this case. As I said, our budget is tiny. All of the experts are working for free. I traveled to Netherlands for my own expense.
Everyone came on their own expense. And so we're just asking, you know, please follow this case. Please support this case. It's absolutely real. Bill Gates is a defendant, absolutely real, and Albert Burla.
And so help us bring some sort of justice. I mean, I'm not hoping for a 100% justice, but something. We need to to to get it somewhere to the public attention.
Speaker 0: Right. We need these cases more than ever because that's where we get the truth. In the court of law, we actually can see the discovery. We can see the documents. We can get them on the record.
And certainly not happening in The United States given their protection. So thank you for your incredible work on this. Thank you for your testimony on this, and we will continue to follow it. Sasha, great to see you. Thank you so much.
Speaker 1: Thank you, Clayton.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Peptides: Self vaxxination by Billy G, BARDA, and Pfizer. The book murder by injection rings a bell.🌞🌞 https://t.co/IJuoWCh5rV
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker attacks peptides as a major concern, asserting that health influencers push peptide use while claiming they are “self vaccinating themselves.” They assert that “the peptides are made by Pfizer and backed by Bill Gates,” and that “the vaccine companies [are] selling the people peptides,” which supposedly makes people “look like skeletons” on social media and in real life. The speaker says influencers trust big pharma after the 2020 pandemic and that people will “stick needles in their chest and their stomach and all over the place” with peptides and then claim it’s a new discovery that everyone should use peptides. They remark that “big pharma companies culled about ten percent of the population with vaccines in 2020,” and question what such products would contain.
The speaker recalls 2020 events, noting that “they were forcing people's masks, they were shutting down businesses, telling people to stand on stickers, people were fighting each other in the grocery store, police were tackling people at the grocery store over something that's completely fake,” and asserts that “the viruses don't even exist.”
They argue against putting peptides into the body, saying it “doesn't really make a lot of sense” and that “Nature doesn't hurt you and it's not involved with big pharma.” For weight loss, they advise sticking to food and natural activity: “If somebody's desperate to lose weight, go run outside,” or “buy a jump rope,” or “go run on the treadmill.” They emphasize that you should simply “start running.”
The speaker as a fitness background person recounts personal experience, suggesting a straightforward approach to health: “You wanna get in shape? You run.” They reiterate the idea of not needing injections to lose weight and to avoid the appearance of a skeletal, sunken-faced look, describing how “they look like skeletons” and “look like freaks” on social media.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Peptides. Peptides is a big one. All these health influencers out there sticking themselves in the neck and sticking themselves with this with peptides, they are self vaccinating themselves. Oh, you didn't know? The peptides are made by Pfizer and backed by Bill Gates.
That's what's funny. So you got the vaccine companies selling the people peptides, which is making them look like skeletons on social media and in real life, and they're self vaccinating themselves and then saying that this is a new discovery and that everybody should get on peptides. It's wild to think that health influencers trust companies like vaccine companies with products after going through the pandemic of twenty twenty. That they will stick needles in their chest and their stomach and all over the place and whatever else with peptides and they're gonna be leveling up after the big pharma companies culled about ten percent of the population with vaccines in 2020. So what do you think they're gonna put in that stuff?
Right? Kinda think about that. I don't know if anybody forgot what happened in 2020 when they were forcing people's masks, they were shutting down businesses, telling people to stand on stickers, people were fighting each other in the grocery store, police were, you know, tackling people at the grocery store over something that's completely fake. Right? The viruses don't even exist.
So yeah. So putting peptides into your body doesn't really make a lot of sense. Stick to food. Nature doesn't hurt you and it's not involved with big pharma. And somebody said they're desperate to lose weight, go run outside.
Like, I mean, I don't know. Buy a jump rope. Go run on the treadmill. Like, I mean, I was in fitness. Go do activity.
Like, it's that simple. Go do some activity. You see that? I got a street right down in front of me. Run down it.
That's what I used to do. You wanna get in shape? You run. That's it. Like you just start running.
Or you get a jump rope and you jump rope until you can't jump rope anymore. You don't need to stick needles in your body to make you lose weight and then look like a skeleton in your face and all sucked in and you're all messed up. I mean, these people look like skeletons. I can see it on social media. They look like freaks.
It's nuts because they're literally losing all the fat in their face and then
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Peptides: self vaxxination brought to by Pfizer, bill gates, and BARDA👇 https://t.co/IYHIr2lhf5
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript criticizes “peptides” promoted by health influencers, claiming influencers are “self-vaccinating themselves” by injecting peptides. It states that peptides are “made by Pfizer and backed by Bill Gates,” and alleges that vaccine companies sell peptides to the public while influencers present them as a “new discovery” and urge others to get on peptides.
The speaker argues it is surprising that influencers would trust “vaccine companies” with products after the events of 2020, referencing mandates such as masks, business shutdowns, social distancing marked on floors, and confrontations in grocery stores, including police tackling people. The speaker connects those 2020 actions to a broader concern about what might be put into peptides, and suggests the previous vaccine effort “coddled about ten percent of the population.”
The speaker advises against using peptides, saying people should “stick to food” and “nature,” and claim peptides are “not involved with big pharma.” The transcript contrasts peptides with exercise for weight loss, recommending running outside or using equipment like a jump rope or treadmill, emphasizing activity as the method to “get in shape.” It also claims that people using peptides “look like skeletons” and appear with “fat” loss in their faces, describing these effects as visible on social media and in real life.
Full Transcript
Peptides. Peptides is a big one. All these health influencers out there sticking themselves in the neck and sticking themselves with this, with peptides, they are self-vaccinating themselves. Oh, you didn't know the peptides are made by Pfizer and backed by Bill Gates. That's what's funny. So you got the vaccine companies selling the people peptides, which is making them look like skeletons on social media and in real life, and they're self-vaccinating themselves and then saying that this is a new discovery and that everybody should get on peptides. It's wild to think that health influencers trust companies like vaccine companies with Products after going through the pandemic of twenty twenty, that they will stick needles in their chest and their stomach and all over the place and whatever else with peptides, and they're gonna be leveling up after the big pharma companies coddled about ten percent of the population with vaccines in twenty twenty. So what do you think they're gonna put in that stuff? Right? Kinda think about that? I don't know if anybody forgot what happened in 2020 when they were forcing people's masks, they were shutting down businesses, telling people to stand on stickers, people were fighting each other in the grocery store, police were, you know, tackling people at the grocery store over something that's completely fake, right? That viruses don't even exist. So, yeah, so putting peptides into your body doesn't really make a lot of sense. Stick to food. Nature doesn't hurt you, and it's not involved with big pharma. And somebody said they're desperate to lose weight, go run outside. Like, I mean, I don't know, buy a jump rope, go run on the treadmill. Like, I mean, I wasn't fitness, go do activity. Like, it's that simple, go do some activity. See that? I got a street right down in front of me? Run down it. That's what I used to do. You wanna get in shape, you run. That's it. Like you just start running. Or you get a jump rope and you jump rope until you can't jump rope anymore. You don't need to stick needles in your body to make you lose weight and then look like a skeleton and your face is all sucked in and you're all messed up. I mean, these people look like skeletons. I can see it on social media. They look like freaks. It's not, 'cause they're literally losing all the fat in their face and in their-