reSee.it - Related Post Feed

0rf
Posted - August 23, 2023 at 3:25 PM
Saved - August 23, 2023 at 10:45 PM

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

The COVID lie that started it all! https://t.co/8xojEzchV5

Video Transcript AI Summary
The World Health Organization warns that the death rate from the coronavirus is rising and currently stands at 3.4%. However, President Trump believes this number is false and that the actual death rate is way under 1%. He has been criticized for spreading misinformation and contradicting health experts. Some scientists suggest that the death rate could be considerably less than 1%, but it is important to rely on information from doctors and scientists rather than hunches. The conflicting messages and misinformation being spread are dangerous and reckless, especially during a pandemic.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The new warning for the World Health Organization at death rate from the coronavirus is rising. 3.4% is higher. Speaker 1: Twice as deadly as previous estimates. Three point 4% Speaker 2: state of emergency. Well, I think the 3.4% is really a false number based on a lot of conversations with a lot The people that do this. I think the number is way under 1%. Speaker 3: So to fact check, the World Health Organization says the coronavirus Death rate is 3.4%. Speaker 1: President Trump lies that the World Health Organization is wrong. The number is 3.4%. 3.4% is what it's being reported around the world. Making it deadlier so much death. Speaker 3: The death Speaker 1: rate. The percentage is 3.4%. And no hunch from the president can change that. Trump lied about the most recent World Health Organization estimate that the global death rate of coronavirus is 3.4%. The 3.4% death rate was wrong, and WHO data later updated it to Speaker 2: For a fraction of 1 ahead. Speaker 1: Let's go back in the history. Trump has a hunch that the death rate is lower than 1%. Speaker 2: Way under 1%. Way under 1%. Speaker 1: Will someone put a mozzarella 2. Stupid old. Don't lie to viewers about the mortality rate. It's way under 1%. False information. He's spreading disinformation. Misinformation two dangerous. Disinformation. Maybe a president of the United States. You have the world's greatest scientist at your disposal. Speaker 4: Can you Speaker 1: listen to that? Leading scientists, including doctor Fauci, wrote in the New England Journal of Medicine that the death rate could be considerably less than 1%. Speaker 2: Way under 1%. Speaker 1: Why are you going on national television and contradicting experts based on a hunch? His fake hunch was some fake math. Speaker 5: The president somehow thinks it could be lower than 1% based on nothing. Speaker 2: Based on a lot of conversations with a lot of people that do this. Speaker 6: Outright lies. Contradicting health officials on fatality rates. Speaker 7: It's not a time for Donald Trump to Speaker 1: be calling into cable shows. It's a time for the CDC. What is CDC's best estimate of the fatality rate? Somewhere between half a percent and 1%. Speaker 2: To a fraction of 1%. Speaker 1: The president is spreading false information. Information discarding what the health professionals The saying. Speaker 8: Outright bogus information. Speaker 1: Science is not based on hunches. Speaker 3: It's a hunch about what he thinks is going on. Speaker 1: Instead of trusting information from doctors and scientists. Speaker 3: He has a hunch. Time to hunch. Speaker 7: It's not a time for Donald Trump's hunches. It's a time for science. It's a time for doctors. Speaker 1: Welcome doctor j Bhattacharya. My hypothesis My hunch. Was as likely to be less deadly than Speaker 2: the World Health Organization's thing. 3.4%. There's no way that was Really, false numbers. Speaker 1: This is why I ran the study in April 2020. And what did you discover? The infection fatality rate was 0.2%. Way under 1%. Trump continues to contradict and downplay all things coronavirus. Speaker 3: The president appearing to contradict medical experts on the mortality rate of the virus. Speaker 2: Personally, I would say the number is way under 1%. Speaker 1: Later on CNN. Our estimates are probably pretty inflated. Speaker 2: Very high. Because the easy cases, they don't report The doctors or the hospital have been Speaker 4: a case. So Initially, WHO released the estimates of 3.4%. Speaker 2: Really, false number. Speaker 1: The true fatality rate is likely to be far far less. Speaker 2: Way under 1%. It could be in Speaker 1: the range of a seasonal influenza. We're a fraction Speaker 2: Should have 1%. This is just my hunch. Speaker 1: He is spreading misinformation and disinformation. Speaker 8: You can even call it information. Speaker 1: An outbreak of sketchy information coming from the president. Using a hunch instead of sending to the global authority on public health. Hunch. Speaker 9: There's lots to be concerned about. His hunch Speaker 1: A hunch. Hunches. Just by hunch and hunch. It's hunch. Speaker 2: By hunch. Based on a lot of conversations with a lot of people, that's not what you want for the American people. Speaker 1: A hunch. I think in retrospect, those quotes are gonna look even more damning. Sometimes you have to laugh to keep from five. The pandemic of misinformation. Put out misinformation. Redding false information. And the disinformation False. Wrong and misleading information. Misleading misinformation and misinformation. Misinformation. Just unspeakably reckless. It's totally reckless. Speaker 3: It's dangerous to have conflicting messages out out there. Speaker 1: That is very dangerous. Speaker 3: How dangerous is it? Really dangerous. Speaker 1: What is the danger? Speaker 3: I think we're in a very dangerous period. If The president continues to hunt

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

https://t.co/uN4NzPuLAa

MJTruthUltra
Posted - August 26, 2023 at 3:40 AM
Saved - August 27, 2023 at 7:07 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Title: Unveiling the Truth: The Dark Realities Surrounding COVID-19 and Vaccination Introduction: Welcome to this eye-opening thread that aims to expose the hidden truths behind the COVID-19 pandemic and the vaccination campaign. In this comprehensive post, we will delve into various alarming aspects, including media manipulation, PCR test controversies, attacks on the unvaccinated, and the unsettling events surrounding the disappearance of the flu. Brace yourself for a thought-provoking journey that will challenge the mainstream narrative and encourage you to stay informed and vigilant. Media Manipulation and PCR Test Controversies: Let's start by addressing the media's control over our minds. It is no secret that the mainstream media plays a significant role in shaping public opinion. However, it is crucial to question the information presented to us. The PCR test, a widely used diagnostic tool, has faced scrutiny due to potential manipulation, leading to inflated COVID-19 case numbers. By understanding these manipulations, we can gain a clearer perspective on the true impact of the virus. Relentless Attacks on the Unvaccinated: Another concerning aspect is the relentless attacks on those who choose not to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. It is essential to respect individual choices and engage in open dialogue rather than resorting to divisive tactics. By fostering understanding and empathy, we can create a more inclusive society that encourages informed decision-making. Event 201, Fauci's Predictions, and Catastrophic Contagion Exercises: Let's explore the events surrounding Event 201, a pandemic simulation exercise that took place shortly before the COVID-19 outbreak. This exercise raises questions about the preparedness and response strategies implemented during the actual pandemic. Additionally, we will examine the predictions made by Dr. Anthony Fauci, a prominent figure in the pandemic response, and how they have shaped our understanding of the crisis. Furthermore, we will shed light on a catastrophic contagion exercise that specifically targeted children, highlighting the potential risks and consequences faced by the most vulnerable members of society. The Disappearance of the Flu and Alarming VAERS Data: One puzzling phenomenon during the pandemic has been the disappearance of the flu. We will explore the possible reasons behind this unexpected occurrence and its implications for public health. Additionally, we will delve into the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data, which reveals concerning adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines. Of particular concern is the rise in myocarditis cases among young adults and children, shedding light on potential risks associated with vaccination. CDC's Manipulation of Vaccination-Related Deaths: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has faced scrutiny regarding its handling of vaccination-related deaths. By examining the manipulation of data and the potential underreporting of adverse events, we can gain a deeper understanding of the risks associated with COVID-19 vaccines. It is crucial to ensure transparency and accountability in order to protect public health. Disturbing Findings and Potential Crimes Against Humanity: Prepare yourself for some truly disturbing findings. Pfizer's addition of an anti-heart attack drug for 5-11-year-olds due to cardiac disorders raises serious concerns about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. Shockingly, medical professionals have reported heart attacks in vaccinated pregnant women, leading to a staggering increase in stillbirths and various complications. These findings point to potential crimes against humanity, demanding further investigation and accountability. Conclusion: In conclusion, it is imperative that we question the mainstream narrative surrounding COVID-19 and vaccination. By staying informed and vigilant, we can uncover the hidden truths and ensure that public health measures are based on transparency, accountability, and the well-being of all individuals. Let us continue to seek the truth and engage in open dialogue to create a society that values critical thinking and informed decision-making. Stay tuned for more updates as we navigate through these challenging times.

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

MASTER THREAD 🧵 THE PLANDEMIC The Greatest Trick the the CDC ever pulled was convince everyone they were sick without any symptoms. Bookmark this Thread! This Master Thread will be updated with everything I’ve accumulated over the last 3 years. It will take me some time to update & it will be an ongoing thread for you to refer to. I will update this thread with 5-10 posts at a time, over time. WHY AM I DOING THIS? I’m just a normal guy with a family… who began questioning where this medical tyranny was taking us. Then I, as did thousands of fellow patriots who felt like something was very wrong, began speaking up. As a consequence to speaking up, thousands of us were banned off of social media. I’ve only been back a few months now, but I have 3 years worth of research that I want everyone to use as ammunition to help awaken others and hopefully avert Plandemic 2.0, which is coming. I have my theories as to why all of this is happening, but for this thread I will do my best to stick to facts & leave conjecture out of it. Let’s begin…

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

This is my very first post in this thread because I believe the greatest driver of the Plandemic was the Main Stream Media. Whoever controls the media, controls the mind. Roughly six corporations control 90+% of ALL what you hear, read, & see. This video should terrify you. As we move forward in this thread, keep this video in mind. https://rumble.com/v3braja-the-mockingbird-mainstream-media-the-illusion-of-choice.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the prevalence of biased and false news on social media, with some media outlets publishing these stories without fact-checking. They emphasize that this is extremely dangerous to our democracy, repeating this statement multiple times.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One side of the inquiry. Plagging our country. Plagging our country. Speaker 1: The sharing of bias and false news has become all too common on social media. More alarming, some media outlets publish these same fake stories without checking facts first. Speaker 0: The sharing fault. Biased and false. False news has become all too common on social media. Fault. And agenda control is exactly what they play. And this is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. Speaker 1: This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. Speaker 0: This is extremely dangerous to our fault. Speaker 1: This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. Speaker 0: This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. Okay. This is extremely dangerous to our risk to our democracy. Speaker 1: This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. Speaker 0: This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
The Mockingbird Mainstream Media - The Illusion of Choice Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

“Covid Surges” were the cause of all the draconian lockdowns we experienced. Those “surges” were determined by something called a PCR test. The powers that be behind this plandemic knew that in order to maintain the constant fearporn of high cases, they decided to use the PCR test. Three Videos for your Review: 1.) This video summarizes how the PCR tests were weaponized against healthy individuals to exaggerate millions of case numbers. In a nutshell, the sample you provided is magnified by each Cycle Threshold (CT’s) A sick person with a viral load can successfully be picked up at 7 CTs. The recommended amplification of a sample is not to exceed >30 CT’s. However, a lot of labs ran everyones samples through 38-40 CT’s, which equated to millions of false positive Covid-cases… The “Experts” then began their campaign to convince everyone that asymptomatic people were spreading Covid. https://rumble.com/v3bnnni-share-with-anyone-who-wants-to-get-a-pcr-test-to-tell-them-if-they-have-cov.html 2.) Kary Mullis, the man who invented the PCR test, who was also a 1993 Nobel Prize winner in Chemistry… Said himself… “PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody… It allows you to take a minuscule amount of anything & make it measurable..” Mr. Mullis unfortunately died in 2019, before the Plandemic. Very coincidental… Kary Mullis Video https://rumble.com/v3bnr9s-kary-mullis-inventor-of-the-pcr-test-you-can-find-anything-in-anybody.html 3.) Anthony Fauci himself admitted that running Cycle Thresholds greater than 35 will almost always result in dead nucleotides of past sicknesses. This is very important to understand why there were so many “cases”. The media ran with it and never stopped. Fauci Video https://rumble.com/v3bnpb0-dr-anthony-fauci-admits-the-pcr-tests-are-useless-if-ran-at-high-thresholds.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
The PCR test, used to determine COVID-19 cases, amplifies RNA fragments to detect the virus. However, the high amplification can also detect traces of dead virus or remnants from other coronaviruses. Scientists recommend not testing over 30 cycle thresholds to avoid false positives. When labs reduced the cycles, case numbers significantly decreased. False positives can occur almost half the time, especially in populations with low COVID-19 prevalence. In the past, PCR tests have caused false epidemics. The test requires skilled technicians and careful handling, but it is currently being conducted on a large scale with hastily trained personnel. Therefore, it is important to question the accuracy of reported case numbers.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So you know all those case numbers we see? They're based on the PCR test. Just how reliable is it? SARS CoV 2, like many other viruses, contains genetic material called RNA. RNA fragments are so small, they're difficult to detect. The PCR test doubles the fragments in what are called cycle thresholds and keeps doubling them until they have enough genetic material to identify. Most labs go up to 38 or 40 cycles, cycles, which means an amplification of 1 trillion times. But is that too much amplification? Because while live virus is present in people who are actually sick, traces of dead virus are present in people who used to be sick even months later or in people who were exposed to a virus, virus, but their body cleared it and they never got sick at all. They're not infectious. Genuinely sick people get a positive test in relatively few cycles because they have a high hide viral load. But the samples of people who are recovered or exposed have to be magnified billions of times to get a positive result. That's why scientists are recommending not testing over 30 cycle thresholds. So what would happen to case numbers if labs cut back to 30? At one New York lab, it resulted in a 63% case reduction. When a Massachusetts lab did the same, almost 90% of their cases disappeared. And that's not the only way that PCR tests can go wrong. They can also misidentify remnants from the other 6 human coronavirus types add SARS CoV 2. Speaker 1: And in fact, if you're testing in a population that doesn't have very much COVID, you'll get false positives Almost half the time, the person actually doesn't have COVID. They have something else. They may have nothing. Speaker 0: In 2007, PCR tests caused a pseudoepidemic for whooping cough at a hospital in New Hampshire. 100% of the results were false positives. Speaker 2: Because if you can model amplify 1 single molecule Up to to something that you can really measure, which BCR can do, then there's just very few molecules that you don't have at least 1 single one of them in your body. Speaker 0: This is a delicate test that's supposed to be done by highly skilled technicians in a Darryl Lab, yet it's currently being done on a massive expedited scale with hastily trained technicians working on huge numbers of tests. So the next time you see case numbers, ask yourself how many of them aren't cases at all.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the misuse of PCR in estimating viral RNA. They explain that PCR can detect almost anything in the body, making it easy to find even rare viruses like HIV. However, they argue that testing for HIV specifically is unnecessary because individuals with HIV are likely to have other viruses as well. They emphasize that PCR is a quantitative tool that provides measurable information, but it does not determine sickness or the potential harm of a virus. The speakers also mention that PCR cannot differentiate between virus particles and active live viruses. Overall, they highlight the limitations and misinterpretations of PCR testing.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I want to ask this to Carrie. How do they misuse PCR to estimate all these so supposed free viral RNAs that may or may not be there? Speaker 1: Is this done? I think See, if you if you if you can say if if they wanted if they could find this virus in you at all. And with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody. It starts making you believe in the amplify 1 single molecule up to something that you can really measure, which PCR can do, then there's just very few molecules that you don't have at least 1 single one of them in your body. Okay? So that could be thought of as a misuse of it just to claim that it's meaningful. But the real misuse of it is, is that you don't need to test for HIV. You don't need to test for the other 10,000 retroviruses that are unnamed also in the subject. See somebody that's got HIV, generally is going to have almost anything that you can test for, because they have definitely HIV is a fairly rare virus. There's only 1,000,000 of out of 250, 300,000,000 people in America that have that virus. So you have to get around, either your mother had to have it and pass it to you, or you have to really paying a lot of attention to people that do have it, is paying only attention to them and get a pretty good chance of getting it that way. It's hard to get it. But if you have it, there's a good chance you've also got a lot of other ones. Because you've been in the market where you've been, it's been possible for you to get a lot of is it it's to test for that one and say that has any special meaning is what I think is the problem. Not that PCR has been misused. It's like It's not an estimation of it's a really quantitative thing. It tells you something about nature little bit measurable and then talk about it in meetings and stuff like it is important. See that that that's not a misuse. That's just sort of a misinterpretation. Speaker 0: Even after all the these, PCR, this quantitative PCR, that if you just get down to a basic virological count, it's still 1 in a 1000 to 1 in 10,000, HIV in 1 to 1 in a 1000 1 in 500 to 1 in a 1000 T cells. Speaker 1: It is. There's very little of what they call HIV and what's been brought out here by Philpot and and and he said already. The measurement for it is not is not exact at all. It's not it's not as good as our measurement for things like apples. An apple is an apple. You know, you can get something that's kinda like, if you got enough things that look kinda like an apple, you stick them all together, you might think of it as an apple. But and HIV is like that. Those tests are all based on things that are invisible and they are the results are inferred in a sense. PCR is separate from that. It's just a process that's used to make a whole lot of something out of something. That's what it is. But it's not. It doesn't tell you that you're sick and it doesn't tell you that the thing you ended up with really was going to hurt you or anything like that. That's why it's not. Speaker 2: So even if you believe in HIV, it can't tell the difference between virus particles or active live virus. I mean, there's a lot of questions involvement. Guys, thank you very very much. I don't know what else I can say, but to, let you know that we will
Video Transcript AI Summary
If a PCR test has a cycle threshold (CT) of 35 or higher, the chances of it being replication competent are very low. So, if someone's PCR test has a CT of 37 or higher, it's unlikely that the virus can be cultured from it. In fact, even a CT of 36 may indicate that it's just dead nucleotides.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Right. Again, a good question. And what is now sort of, evolving into a bit of a standard that if you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more, that the chances of it being replication competent are miniscule. So that's a very important question. Somebody comes in, and they repeat their PCR, and it's like 37 cycle threshold. But you never you almost never can culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle. So I think if Somebody does come in with 37, 38, even 36. You gotta say, you know, it's just it's just dead nucleotides, period.
The PCR Test’s are Flawed Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
Kary Mullis - Inventor of the PCR Test “You can Find anything in Anybody” Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
Dr Anthony Fauci Admits the PCR Tests are Useless if Ran at High Thresholds Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

I want to again highlight the Mainstream Media & their relentless psychological attacks on the unvaccinated… This should terrify you.. —— MSNBC • “You are the unvaccinated. You are the problem. It is the unvaccinated who are the problem, period, end of story. • “The anti-vaxer’s seem to have a thing for death & home remedies” • “The unvaccinated should be taxed. They should pay more for healthcare.” —— CNN • “The only people you can blame, maybe they should be shamed, are the unvaccinated” • “Anyone you came into contact with, Will blame you, as will the rest of us.” • “It’s time to start blaming the unvaccinated folks” • “It’s the unvaccinated are the threat” • “You’re punishing the vaccinated for the sins of the vaccinated” • “You’re treading on our freedom, really you’re killing other people” • “You have to start doing things for the greater good of society and not for idiots who think they can do their own research.” • “Oh you can’t shame them.. you can’t call them stupid. Yes, they are.” • “We need to start looking at the choice to remain unvaccinated, the same while driving while intoxicated.” • “Literally, the only people dying are the unvaccinated, and for those spreading misinformation, shame on you.” —— OTHER MSM • “ We know we can’t trust the unvaccinated” • “The vaccinated feel the unvaccinated are making me feel upset or angry” • “No, screw your Freedom” • “When are we going to stop putting up with the idiots of this country and say it’s mandatory to get vaccinated. F*ck their freedom • Fauci said our hospitals are overwhelmed… “It’s not complicated to me… Vaccinated person who suffered a heart attack, come on in…. Unvaccinated person who gobbled horse goo, rest in peace weezy” —— JOE BIDEN - The p[R]esident • “We’ve been patient… but our patience is wearing thin. • “It’s not about freedom or personal choice” • “Those who are not vaccinated will end up paying the price” This Video https://rumble.com/v2nr2ry-the-unvaccinated-are-scum.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video features various speakers expressing their frustration and blame towards the unvaccinated. They argue that the unvaccinated are the problem and should be shamed for their choices. The vaccinated are being asked to wear masks to protect the unvaccinated, which is seen as a moral obligation. Some speakers believe that mandatory vaccination is necessary, while others criticize the unvaccinated for endangering lives and being ignorant. There is a call for the unvaccinated to be taxed and treated similarly to drunk drivers. The video concludes with the assertion that every COVID death could have been prevented if everyone had been vaccinated.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You are the unvaccinated. You are the problem. It is the unvaccinated who are the problem, period. End of story. Speaker 1: The only people that you can blame the only people you can blame this isn't shaming. This is the truth. Maybe they should be shamed by the unvaccinated. Speaker 2: Just have to start Blaming the unvaccinated folks, not the regular folks. Speaker 1: Anyone you came into contact with will blame you as will the rest of us who've done the right thing by getting vaccinated. Speaker 3: Because frankly, we know that we can't trust the unvaccinated. I think Speaker 2: it's Time to get our moral house in order, Anderson. It's the unvaccinated who are the threat. Speaker 0: All these vaccinated folks are gonna start wearing masks To protect the unvaccinated folks. It's called a Christian value. Speaker 4: They're basically punishing the vaccinated, for the the sins of the unvaccinated. Speaker 3: People are not behaving honorably. The unvaccinated are basically saying, Well, it's open season for me. I can do whatever I want as well. Speaker 5: The the unvaccinated are basically beating their breasts running around the country Saying, We don't care. We're living free and so forth. Speaker 6: We've been patient, but our patience is wearing thin. Speaker 7: Unvaccinated, A group that includes children and people acting like children. And the rest of us are starting to get pissed off. Speaker 8: The vaccinated feel the unvaccinated are Making me upset or angry. Speaker 6: This is not about freedom or personal choice. Speaker 2: Well, my freedom is being kind of disturbed here. No. Screw your freedom. Speaker 4: The other day, Howard Stern weighed in with a much different approach. Speaker 2: Take a look. Speaker 9: When are we gonna stop putting up with the idiots in this country And just say, you know, it's mandatory to get vaccinated. Their freedom. Speaker 10: But you're treading on our freedom, Speaker 4: and you're making Other people say, really, you're killing other people. The anti vaxxers, they seem to have a thing for death and home remedies. Speaker 6: The anti maskers turned anti vaxxers are Not just putting their own lives at risk. If that was the issue, we could just say that we can watch them compete to win place their show in the Darwin Awards. Speaker 1: We have to start doing things for the greater good of society and not for idiots who think that they can do their own research. And don't get me started on the lunatics who won't take any of the COVID vaccines Speaker 2: Life is too short to be an ass. Life is way too short to be ignorant of the promise of something that is Helping people worldwide. Speaker 11: Maybe you're doing it because, you're you're disconnected or disorganized. Maybe you have some sympathetic psychological reasons, But maybe you're just being antisocial. Speaker 1: Oh, you can't shame them. You can't call them stupid. You can't call them silly. Yes. They are. Speaker 6: Those who are not vaccinated will end up paying the price. The unvaccinated should be taxed. They should pay more for health care. Speaker 3: We need to start looking At the choice to remain unvaccinated, the same as we look at driving while intoxicated. Speaker 2: We're gonna see, and I've said, almost Mhmm. 2 types of America. Speaker 5: Doctor Fauci said that if hospitals get any more overcrowded, they're gonna have to make some very tough choices about who gets an ICU. But I don't that choice doesn't seem so tough to me. Person having a heart attack, yes. Come right on in. We'll take care of you. Unvaccinated guy who gobbled horse goo, rest in peace, Wheezy. Speaker 0: Pointing back to the unvaccinated Who are really creating a problem in this country. Every death that we are seeing from COVID could have Been prevented. Speaker 8: Literally, the only people dying are the unvaccinated. And for those of you spreading misinformation, shame on you. Speaker 7: Shame on you. I don't know how some of you sleep at
The Unvaccinated are Scum Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

October 18, 2019, something called EVENT 201 took place in New York, NY. EVENT 201 was a Tabletop Pandemic Simulation of a Coronavirus that escaped & killed 60 million people, sponsored by the WHO, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, World Economic Forum, John’s Hopkins Center for Security, & the CIA. Covid was announced 6 weeks after this tabletop exercise. Is that a coincidence? This Clip https://rumble.com/v1ovvf0-the-real-anthony-fauci-event-201-the-pandemic-simulation-in-2019.html RDK’s Full Documentary can be found by searching for “The Real Anthony Fauci Documentary” Online.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Today's video is about a simulation called event two zero one, which simulated meetings of a group called the Pandemic Emergency Board. The simulation was sponsored by the World Economic Forum, Johns Hopkins School for Security, and funded by NIH and Gates. The video discusses the importance of communication and combating disinformation during a pandemic. It also mentions the need for governments to take unprecedented actions and the potential for a severe global pandemic. The simulation took place before the first reported case of coronavirus in Wuhan, China. It highlights the strain on healthcare systems, the need for a vaccine, and the shortage of medical supplies.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, I will be your master Today, I will be Speaker 1: your master of ceremonies for event two zero one. Speaker 2: Today's scenario is going to simulate meetings of a multi stakeholder group called the Pandemic Emergency Board. This Ford has been urgently convened by the World Economic Forum. Speaker 3: In October of 2019, You have a tabletop simulation that is sponsored by Foundation, the World Economic Forum, Johns Hopkins School For Security, which is funded by NIH and Gates. The major host include not only Gates but also April Haines, who is the former Deputy Director of the CIA. So what is the CIA Doing, hosting a simulation on public health. The CIA is not a public health agency. It is An intelligence agency that does not do public health. Speaker 4: The line between disinformation and misinformation is not always an easy one to find that we shouldn't be trying to Control Communication but rather flood the zone. And I certainly seen the value of communicating constantly on these issues, so as to continue To deal with, you know, sort of the vacuum that can be created in this circumstance. All of the disinformation that will be put out, it's going to be important to actually have a response to those There are also intelligence sources identifying multiple foreign disinformation campaigns. Speaker 5: Governments need to be willing to do things that Are out of their historical perspective or for the most part it's really a war footing that we need to be on. Speaker 6: It can happen quickly, a Marshall Type plan, probably you may say that exactly, but a Marshall Plan, it can go into effect and stimulate change Very quick. The distrust relates to the health system more generally. Speaker 1: A step up from the part of the government on enforcement actions against fake news. Speaker 7: I think a couple of therapy. Things we have to consider are even before this began, the anti vaccine movement was very strong and this is something specifically through social media that is spread. So as We move forward, obviously, trust in pharmaceuticals and government is very important at this moment. Speaker 3: The simulation is a simulation Of a coronavirus that has escaped and ends up killing the 60,000,000 people around the planet. The Chinese government knew they escaped the virus by September 12, 2019. Curiously, Who is there is George Gao, who is the head of the Chinese CDC. At that time, George Gao almost certainly knew the coronavirus circulating. Speaker 2: Infected people got a respiratory illness with symptoms ranging from mild flu like signs of ceremony. The sickest required intensive care, many die. It's spreading rapidly throughout local communities. International travel has turned local epidemics into a pandemic spanning the globe. There are now Speaker 8: more than 30,000 reported cases. Experts warn this may be just the beginning of a global problem. Speaker 2: More than half of the recognized cases have fired hospital care creating a huge strain on health care systems. The fatality rate is about 10%. Because it appears the virus is readily transmitted through the air from person to person, essentially, all people are susceptible. Experts agree unless it is quickly controlled, it could lead to a severe pandemic, an outbreak that circles the globe, and affects people everywhere. 2 to 4 times more lethal than the 1918 influenza pandemic, the worst pandemic on record. Even so, some people only exhibit mild flu like symptoms not requiring treatment in the hospital. Alarmingly, those people are able to walk around and spread the virus not realizing they are doing so. Even worse, International travelers have been arriving at their destinations symptom free, but within a matter of hours, becoming ill. Travel related cases have blossomed into outbreaks in a number of locations and have quickly grown faster than health Authorities could respond Speaker 8: and contain them. I'm joined by immunologist, doctor Evani Bello, and doctor Raelia Blakey, an epidemiologist, both highly respected in their field. Speaker 1: Researchers are working on a vaccine. Even if we discover a good vaccine candidate, We're starting from scratch, and it takes time to test safety and efficacy, typically years. Speaker 2: We simply cannot rely on these old time lines and processes. With enough money and political will, anything is possible. Speaker 8: Our US affiliate has just released Polling results and public expectations for a vaccine. A majority of Americans expect a vaccine to be available within 2 months, and 65% of those polled are eager to take the vaccine even if it's experimental. In related news, a significant demand for personal protective equipment, like n of equipment like N95 masks and gloves are on the rise due to the pandemic. However, globally, hospitals are running low. Ceremony. Other critical medical supplies such as saline and antibiotics are dwindling. Countries and companies are reportedly stockpiling supplies, disrupting health care supply chains, causing dangerous shortages in many parts of the world. Speaker 5: What you just witnessed were highlights from event two zero one. This pandemic simulation exercise of the coronavirus took place about 6 weeks before the first Illness from the coronavirus was actually reported in Wuhan, China. Now the simulation also includes news reports which were fabricated just for this
The Real Anthony Fauci: Event 201, the Pandemic Simulation in 2019 Watch the Full FILM HERE https://rumble.com/v1ovda8-the-real-anthony-fauci-documentary-part-1.html Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthen rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

In 2017, Anthony Fauci made “prediction” that Trumps administration will have to deal with a “Surprise outbreak” How did he know? https://rumble.com/v1f3sn7-anthony-fauci-predicts-there-will-be-a-surprise-outbreak-in-trumps-administ.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
I have served in 5 administrations and want to share my perspective on pandemic preparedness. Based on my experience, I want to emphasize that the coming administration will face challenges in dealing with infectious diseases. This includes both chronic diseases and unexpected outbreaks. The history of the last 32 years as the director of NIAID shows that there is no doubt the next administration will have to confront these challenges.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Given, as you heard from the introduction, that I have been around for a while and have had the opportunity and and the privilege and the pleasure of serving in 5 administrations, I thought I would bring that perspective to the topic today is the issue of pandemic, preparedness. And if there's 1 message that I want to leave with you today based on my experience, and you'll see that in a moment, is that there is no question that there will be a challenge, the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases, both chronic infectious diseases in the sense of already ongoing disease, and we have certainly a large burden of that, but also there will be a surprise outbreak. There will be a surprise outbreak. There will be a surprise outbreak. And I hope by the end of my relatively short presentation, you will understand why history the history of the last 32 years that I've been the director of NIAID will tell the next administration that there's no doubt in anyone's mind that they will be faced with the challenges that their predecessors
Anthony Fauci “Predicts” There will be a Surprise Outbreak in Trumps Administration- 01/10/2017 Dr. Anthony Fauci “Predicts” There will be a Surprise Outbreak in Trumps Administration- January 10, 2017 Truth Teller in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candle rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

October 23, 2022 The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, in partnership with WHO and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, along with the CIA conducted a tabletop Catastrophic Contagion exercise at the Grand Challenges Annual Meeting in Brussels, Belgium. This “exercise” pandemic is deadlier than the coronovirus and SPECIFICALLY TARGETS CHILDREN! “As of today, there have been an estimated 1 billion cases worldwide with more than 20 million deaths, including nearly 15 million children. Countless millions are alive, but left with paralysis or brain damage,” says GNN, the fake news agency from the exercise. TODAY— Now we’re hearing about an even “deadlier variant” and upcoming lockdowns again in the fall… Joe Biden just announced “New Vaccines” for the new variant. Is that a coincidence? This video https://rumble.com/v206rpy-johns-hopkins-who-and-gates-foundation-simulate-a-catastrophic-contagion-th.html The exercise https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/exercises/2022-catastrophic-contagion/

Video Transcript AI Summary
Latin American countries alerted the WHO of outbreaks of a new infectious disease that could cause a severe pandemic if containment and mitigation efforts fail. Pandemics are political, financial, and global health risks. National leadership is crucial, along with support for local and national responses, training, and regional solidarity. Communication is key, involving scientists, social, religious, and political leaders. Trust is essential and needs to be rebuilt among countries, populations, and healthcare systems. The WHO should strengthen its role as a voice for the voiceless. Over a billion cases and 20 million deaths, including 15 million children, have been reported worldwide. Pandemic preparedness and response teams were established, but more countries should have participated. Lessons learned should be applied to future pandemics.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Officials in 2 Latin American countries alerted the WHO of several outbreaks of a new infectious disease that's the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the Speaker 1: the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the Speaker 0: the the the the the the the the the reported: the virus could cause a severe pandemic if early containment and mitigation efforts are not successful. Speaker 2: The pandemic In this type of situation and trend, would be a risk for the global health security. Pandemics are inherently political, financial and so much broader. Speaker 3: We have not spoken on the leadership in the country. And I think that we need to be also very careful. We cannot decide a lot of things without the leaders be involved and agree on that. Speaker 2: There is no substitute for national leadership. It's important to support the local response or Speaker 4: the national response. Training those that Speaker 2: are in these areas first, enabling them with the tools, protecting them. And it needs the regional solidarity first. Speaker 4: At this stage, communication is key. And communication should include not just scientists with data but also social, religious and political leaders. Speaker 2: Trust. This is an essential issue. And Trust was broken among countries, between populations and health care systems, between health care Speaker 3: I'm very sorry to say that in 2025, we need to strengthen the WHO needs to be a voice for the voiceless? Speaker 5: As of today, there have been an estimated one 1,000,000,000 cases worldwide with more than 20,000,000 deaths including nearly 15,000,000 children. Templest and trained for this moment years in advance. This included having full time pandemic preparedness and response teams which conducted detailed operational and routinely tested those plans through exercises and drills. If more countries had participated and heeded Speaker 6: I feel sad that the warnings about the pandemic were not heated enough, but I feel good that now the world will do the right thing so that the next pandemic Do the right thing so that the next pandemic, things will be good. It's a very sad thing, but we have to take advantage of The innovations that it helped highlight. Speaker 5: Well, thank you so much.
Johns Hopkins, WHO, & Gates Foundation Simulate a Catastrophic Contagion that Targets Children! Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth ALL MY RUMBLE CHANNELS - Feel Goods https rumble.com
Catastrophic Contagion A pandemic tabletop exercise at the Grand Challenges Annual Meeting in Brussels, Belgium, on October 2022. catastrophiccontagion.centerforhealthsecurity.org

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

Look who “predicted” another Pandemic in April 2023 Anthony Fauci… “There will absolutely be another outbreak of another pandemic.” This Video https://rumble.com/v2glmpu-anthony-fauci-there-will-absolutely-be-an-outbreak-of-another-pandemic..html

Video Transcript AI Summary
We must take action to prevent future pandemics as they are inevitable in the lifetimes of our grandchildren and great-grandchildren. The exact timing of the next outbreak is uncertain, but we need to be prepared.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We really wanna prevent the next pandemic, and there will be one. There will absolutely be an outbreak grandparent your grandchildren and your grandparent your grandchildren and your great grandchildren's lifetime. We don't know. So if we really
Anthony Fauci - “there will absolutely be an outbreak of another pandemic.” April 3, 2023 Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social htt rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

It wasn’t just Fauci…. May 2023, WHO Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus even gave his own “prediction” The next pandemic that will be ‘even deadlier’ than COVID is coming, warns WHO “The threat of another variant emerging that causes new surges of disease and death remains,” Tedros said. “And the threat of another pathogen emerging with even deadlier potential remains.” “When the next pandemic comes knocking — and it will — we must be ready to answer decisively, collectively and equitably,” He goes on to say how we need to hand over our sovereignty by agreeing to the Pandemic Accord. (I’ll cover this later in the thread) This Video https://rumble.com/v2pn9xa-the-next-pandemic-will-be-even-deadlier-than-covid-is-coming-warns-who.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
The end of COVID-19 as a global health emergency doesn't mean it's no longer a threat. The Global Strategic Preparedness and Response Plan for COVID-19 emphasizes the need for action in five core areas. We still face the risk of new variants causing more disease and death, as well as the potential emergence of deadlier pathogens. We can't ignore these challenges. We must make necessary changes now to be prepared for the next pandemic. The Pandemic Accord is a commitment to international cooperation and a shared response to future threats. It's a generational agreement that aims to prevent panic and neglect, ensuring a more resilient world.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The end of COVID nineteen as a global health emergency is not the end of COVID as a global health threat. Earlier this month, the Secretariat published the 4th edition of the Global Strategic Preparedness and Response Plan for COVID nineteen, which outlines critical actions for countries in 5 core areas. The threat of another variant emerging that causes new surges of disease and death remains. And the threat of another pathogen emerging with even deadlier potential remains. We cannot kick this can down the road. If we do not make the changes that must be made, then who will? And if we do not make them now, and when? When the next pandemic comes knocking, and it will, we must be ready to answer this time for enhanced international cooperation, the pandemic accord? A generational commitment that we will not go back to the old cycle of panic and neglect that left our world vulnerable, but moved forward with a shared commitment to meet shared threats with a shared response. That's why we say the Pandemic Accord is a generational agreement.
The next pandemic will be ‘even deadlier’ than COVID is coming, warns WHO Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

Before I get too ahead of myself, let’s talk again about “Covid Cases” Without “cases”, there is no need for lockdowns. Without “cases”, there is no Pandemic… One of the biggest mysteries of the Plandemic was the fact that the Flu completely disappeared… According to CDC & WHO data, as well as scientific journals, since November 2020, the drop-off in flu numbers following COVID’s arrival was swift and global, which caused a less than 1% positivity rate. What the “Fact Checkers” Say… • The Flu Vaccines were very effective that year, that’s why… • Due to Covid, staying home, social distancing, washing our hands, wearing masks slowed the spread of the flu…. Me— Ok…. If that worked for the flu, why didn’t it work for Covid? The logic doesn’t add up.. https://google.com/amp/s/www.scientificamerican.com/article/flu-has-disappeared-worldwide-during-the-covid-pandemic1/%3famp=true…

Flu Has Disappeared for More Than a Year Scientific American is the essential guide to the most awe-inspiring advances in science and technology, explaining how they change our understanding of the world and shape our lives. scientificamerican.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

VAERS Data A nurse friend of mine, who was terrified of losing her job, brought this to my attention… She didn’t want to lose her job, but she didn’t want to get the vaccines either due of all of the adverse effects she saw in those who did get vaccinated early. She was also very familiar with something called VAERS and what she saw terrified her. VAERS is the primary mechanism in the U.S. for reporting adverse vaccine reactions. According to the VAERS website, healthcare providers are required by law to report to VAERS. Sadly, fewer than 1% of adverse events have ever been reported to VAERS… but… and this is a very big but…. That 1% tells quite a terrifying story. VAERS began recording data in 1990 of ALL vaccine adverts events. Notice the difference in numbers in every single category, by year… Let’s Go Over a Few Categories: DEATHS: • 2021- 22,277 deaths were reported. • 2022- 12,462 deaths were reported • 2023, As of Today- 2,472 deaths have been reported. — Compare the Years prior. — If these numbers represent only a 1% reporting rate, do some math on what the possible real number could be. Check for Yourself https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data/mortality MYOCARDITIS/PERICARDITIS: • 2021- 15,710 incidents reported • 2022- 10,604 incidents reported • 2023 as of Today- 1,372 incidents reported so far — Compare the Years prior. — If these numbers represent only a 1% reporting rate, do some math on what the possible real number could be. Check for Yourself https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data/myo-pericarditis MISCARRIAGES & STILLBIRTHS: • 2021- 3,427 incidents reported • 2022- 1,525 incidents reported • 2023- As of Today- 188 incidents reported Check for yourself https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data/reproductive-health MENSTRUAL: • 2021- 27,799 incidents reported • 2022- 16,214 incidents reported • 2023- As of Today- 1,945 incidents reported — Compare the Years prior. — If these numbers represent only a 1% reporting rate, do some math on what the possible real number could be. — Women everyone bagn experiencing menstrual issues after being vaccinated, which prompted hundreds of thousands of women to create groups on Facebook. One of the groups was reported to have 40k+ members… Ultimately, Facebooks “Covid-19 Misinformation Policy” reportedly took these groups down & Facebook even began removing individual posts. https://amp.theguardian.com/technology/2021/feb/08/facebook-bans-vaccine-misinformation Check for yourself https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data/reproductive-health Every single category on the VAERS website is just like this. What was the one common denominator that occurred worldwide around the time of these spikes? The vaccines…

Mortality - OpenVAERS openvaers.com
Myo/Pericarditis - OpenVAERS openvaers.com
Reproductive Health - OpenVAERS openvaers.com
Facebook bans misinformation about all vaccines after years of controversy Company will remove posts with false claims about vaccines on Facebook and Instagram amp.theguardian.com
Reproductive Health - OpenVAERS openvaers.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

If those numbers don’t terrify you, this will… What if It was far worse? Many of those adverse events talked about in the above post are not even reported because the CDC did something truly sinister. According to the CDC, a person is not considered fully vaccinated until after two weeks of their last recommended dosage. https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2021/p0402-travel-guidance-vaccinated-people.html Click on any category on VAERS… Look at the spike in numbers following inoculation. https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data Let’s focus on just one of these Categories in VAERS: 👉 Deaths The CDC denies that these deaths are related to C19 vaccines, but their own data as well as VAERS data shows approximately 50 percent of all deaths occurred within 48-hours of vaccination. 2+2=4 Here’s the kicker— Everyone that died within that two week window (after being vaccinated) were considered an unvaccinated death. Do you understand what I just said? The CDC’s claim that an individual is not fully vaccinated until after two weeks of their final shot, exonerates them from all vaccine related harm that occurred within that two week window, while additionally serving to inflate the numbers.

CDC Newsroom CDC public health news, press releases, government public health news, medical and disease news, story ideas, photos. cdc.gov
COVID Vaccine Data - OpenVAERS openvaers.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

It gets worse… These slides are from an FDA document “Vaccines & Related Biological Products Advisory Committee October 22, 2020” and provides a list of possible adverse reactions to be expected with the C19 vaccines. FDA Document https://fda.gov/media/143557/download In a nutshell, the FDA expected & projected the same adverse reactions from the C19 vaccines. The FDA even states they would be holding weekly & bi-weekly meetings on VAERS activities. This VAERS document from December 31, 2021 states: “The total number of deaths associated with the COVID-19 vaccines is more than double the number of deaths associated with all other vaccines combined since the year 1990.” https://vaersanalysis.info/2022/01/07/vaers-summary-for-covid-19-vaccines-through-12-31-2021/ If the FDA held weekly meetings on VAERS activities, you would this statement alone would set off alarms.. It never did…

FDA Error fda.gov
VAERS Summary for COVID-19 Vaccines through 12/31/2021 – VAERS Analysis vaersanalysis.info

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

With the explosion of Myocarditis reports in young healthy adults & children that occurred after allowing children to be vaccinated, which is evident in the VAERS data… Pfizer ended up adding an Anti-Heart Attack Drug called Tromethamine for 5-11 year olds after thousands of cardiac disorders were seen in 12-17 year olds. The document also says, “The medicine may cause tissue damage if the drug leaks from the vain.“ along with a plethora of other effects. It appears they recognized the jab was causing heart attacks in children and swapped one ingredient with another to assist with the rise in heart attacks. They did all of this quietly… EUA Amendment Request for Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 Vaccine for Use in Children 5 Through 11 Years of Age October 26, 2021 https://fda.gov/media/153447/download

Video Transcript AI Summary
The EUA amendment request for the Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine for children aged 5 to 11 reveals a change in the product formulation. Instead of using phosphate buffered saline, they now use tromethamine buffer, which is actually a heart attack drug. The document mentions potential side effects, including tissue damage if the drug leaks from the vein. This is concerning because the vaccine is supposed to be given intramuscularly, not intravenously. The side effects listed include allergic reactions, skin problems, breathing difficulties, and cardiovascular issues. The inclusion of another drug and the lack of attention to this matter is alarming. It seems like the rules are being changed without proper scrutiny, and now they are administering a dangerous blood thinner to children, which could lead to tissue damage.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: EUA amendment request for Pfizer BioNTech COVID nineteen vaccine for use in children 5 through 11 years old, dated October 26, 2021. So just before Halloween, they decided to sneak this through. Now if you go down to page 14 Now this is the incredible part. Yeah. This is it right here. So the product is the product. Formulation. To provide a vaccine with improved stability profile, the Pfizer Monotech COVID nineteen teen uses in children's 5 to 11, uses tromethamine buffer instead of phosphate buffered saline as used in previous formulations and excludes sodium chloride and potassium chloride. So there it is. But that's not a buffer. It's not a buffer. It's a literal heart attack drug, and that's what they claim here. So you go to drugs So again, they're doing all through changing definitions. They're just exactly how they change the definition of what a vaccine is. But here it is, Tromethamine, it's used to prevent acid problems in the blood. That doesn't sound like a buffer. That doesn't sound like saline solution when you think of saline solution. Now you go through, it says, well, it's not for newborns. That's one thing it says. But this is interesting. Some people may have very bad and sometimes deadly side effects when taking a drug. So there it is right there. And then it lists the different side effects that could happen. But this is what caught my eye more than anything. Medicine may cause tissue damage if drug links from the vein. Now why is that interesting? So when you and this is from my understanding of when nurses give these shots. They're supposed to give them into the muscle, not into the vein because if it gets in the vein, that's why you're having problems with these, blood clots and other heart problems and other blood disorders that people are going through. So and this says here, there's a problem if it leaks from the vein. It's supposed to be given intravenously, which is So they're mixing drugs that are contraintegrated. Exactly. And you can look at what the side effects are here, allergic reaction, rash, high blistered, peeling skin, trouble breathing, hoarseness, swelling, low blood sugar, shortness of breath, fever. But then there's another little you could go to more detail. Oh, and it has other ones, cardiovascular, chemical phlebitis, venospasms, cardiovascular. They say they're not frequently reported, but here they are, exfoliation tissue damage. And again, Rob, I want to continue with this, but here's the big issue. They're putting another drug with another drug and then burying it in a document. And nobody's talking about it. Yeah, yeah. That's the big thing. Nobody's talking about this. It's not, You have to go search through the 14 But it shows they blew up like, like, said in 2019, we're gonna blow the whole system up, do whatever you want. That's true. It's just mad scientists doing whatever they want. And all they have to do is a pandemic together, and then that gives them the excuse to do whatever they want and just change the rules. And now they're putting very dangerous blood thinner in children. Heptocellular necrosis. That's the tissue damage that that you're gonna see happen when they give this, vaccine to the kids.

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

Medical Professionals Raised Alarms that Babies were Having HEART ATTACKS in the Wombs of Vaccinated Women - CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY! Prior to 2021, Intrauterine fetal demise (stillbirth) occurs when a child dies in the womb at or around the 20th week pregnancy— was extremely uncommon. 2021, the number of stillbirths explode… 1,200 fold increases… One single OBGYN was on track to see 9,000 high risk OB ultrasounds. • 1,200 fold increases in menstrual abnormalities • Miscarriages up • Birth defects up • Fetal cardiac arrhythmia up • Fetal malformations up • Reduction in amniotic fluid — Are you saying babies are having heart attacks in the womb? “Yes, The vaccines are causes a significant inflammatory effect.” March 1st, 2021 The FDA, under a federal judges order, began releasing data… one of these documents was a Post Marketing Analysis https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf This Document Outlined • 83% of all vaccinated pregnant women ended up with a dead baby • 274 Pregnancies, they couldn’t account for what happened to 238 of those pregnancies… the remaining pregnancies resulted in a dead baby… all but one single baby. Pfizer wanted these documents to come out 55 years later. Why??? Crimes Against Humanity! This Video https://rumble.com/v1wjpjy-the-vaccines-are-causing-babies-to-have-heart-attack-in-the-womb-crimes-aga.html Link For Video in Above Post (forgot to add) https://rumble.com/v3c4vdi-pfizer-quietly-adds-anti-heart-attack-drug-tromethamine-to-child-covid-shot.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Before the vaccines, there were 1 to 2 fetal demises every 2-3 months. However, an email claimed that there were 22 fetal demises in just one month, with projections of increasing each month. A funeral home director mentioned that 5 out of 6 cases were vaccinated, and the other received remdesivir. There seems to be an increase in fetuses stored in refrigerators compared to previous years. A high-risk obstetrician with extensive experience noted a significant rise in stillbirth rates, with a rate of 29.3 per 1,000 live births. There have also been alarming numbers of dead fetuses, miscarriages, birth defects, and fetal cardiac issues. However, a safety monitoring system found no increased risks for pregnant women who received the vaccine. The birth rate in Hungary dropped by 20% after mass vaccinations began. A volunteer at a hospital was told not to come in as there were no babies being born. The speaker expresses concern about the potential rarity of seeing newborn babies due to the impact of the vaccine.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello? Speaker 1: Hi, Michelle. This is Nick and Matthew. How are you? Speaker 0: I'm good. So before the vaccines came out, there were 1 to 2 fetal denises. Every 2 or 3 months, you would see I finally had enough when I got this email the other day. It said that there was a record of fetal demises and that there were 22 of them in 1 month. And in this email, it says that it's projected to increase each month. Speaker 2: The fetal demise in mothers gestational mothers in that 22 to 26 week period, I had a run of that in funeral home, and 5 of the 6 were vaccinated, the other had remdesivir, and They all lost their infants. Speaker 1: We're just seeing a fridge full of babies, but we're not actually doing the funeral. So that's a mystery to me as to Where these babies are going? So you're saying there's more fetuses in the refrigerators now than there was 2021. Yeah. I'm saying is more fetuses now in in in the refrigerator than I've seen ever before. Speaker 3: I've been doing high risk obstetrics for 43 years. I see a vast number of patients a year. I don't know of any other maternal fetal medicine physician in this country that sees as many patients as I do By ultrasound, at one point in time, this year, I was on track to see 9,000 high risk OB ultrasounds. So I know what's going on. And I've seen death and destruction like I've never seen before. The stillbirth rate Is measured in terms of live births per 1,000. And really it's come down in my career from about 10 to about Almost 5.8 or 6. Now let's go to 2021 and look at the stillbirth rate for Michelle's. This is horrifying. But if you take this death figure and you look at that rate at 29.3, That sigma that you're looking at is 40 plus Sigma, standard deviation. Let that sink in. This is from Waterloo, Canada. 83 still burst, about 4,000 deliveries. That exact same thing you saw with Michelle's. If that weren't bad enough, look at this. I couldn't even put it. There were 13 dead fetuses In 1 24 hour period, 1 20 4 hour period. 1200 fold in menstrual abnormalities. And then when we get into pregnancy, we're looking at a substantial increase in miscarriages, In birth defects, a substantial risk of fetal cardiac arrhythmia, fetal cardiac malformations, significant fetal growth slowing, Significant reduction in amniotic fluid, fetal cardiac arrest. Speaker 2: Are you saying babies are having heart attacks? Speaker 3: Yes. The vaccine causes a significant inflammatory effect. Speaker 4: Three different safety monitoring systems, again, they found no Significant safety signals for the mother or for the fetus because we have to remember in obstetrics, we're dealing with 2 patients. So no increased risks to be vaccinated while pregnant. Speaker 3: Anything that causes inflammation in my business, in my area of expertise causes damage, injury, Death and destruction in pregnancy. We've known that for half a century. Speaker 5: On March March first, the FDA released the 1st round of thousands of pages of data submitted by Pfizer for review of their COVID nineteen Vaccine. Speaker 6: It's the 5.3.6 post marketing analysis of the adverse events in which They outlined that 83% of all pregnant women who got vaccinated ended up with a dead baby. They had 2 70 pregnancies. They could not account for what happened to 238 of those pregnancies, and the remaining pregnancies resulted in a dead baby. Speaker 5: And originally, the documents were going to take 55 years to be released. But because of the court order, we'll get all of the documents Speaker 7: Thank you for the floor, Mr. President. Honorable National Assembly, In January this year, something happened that has not happened for decades. The birth rate fell by 20% compared to the line came just 9 months after the COVID mass vaccinations began in Hungary. Speaker 5: Now I will say a friend mind. She just told me this the other day. Her mother had volunteered at the hospital prior to COVID. So they called her and said, hey. Would you cut them back in and She volunteered obstetrics. Right? Babies. So she said, yeah. Alright. So they retrained her, and then they called her back and said, I guess there's no point you coming in. We're not having any babies born. Speaker 6: I never pass up an opportunity. When I see a newborn baby, I stop and I drink it in because my heart aches to think That seeing a newborn baby may become one of the rarest things. And and I want to be wrong. I hope I'm wrong. But so many people have taken this. There's nothing as close to seeing the face of god as seeing a newborn. And you have this evil that is is destroying
The Vaccines are Causing Babies to Have Heart Attacks in the Womb! CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY! Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth ALL MY RUMBLE CHANNELS - Feel Goods https rumble.com
Pfizer Quietly Adds Anti-Heart Attack Drug Tromethamine to Child Covid Shots - October 26, 2021 Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

That’s it for the day …. I will update THIS THREAD again over the next few days. When it’s updated, this message will self-destruct. Stay Tuned! There’s a lot more. :)

FredDiBiase247
Posted - September 8, 2023 at 9:27 AM
Saved - September 9, 2023 at 7:50 AM

@FredDiBiase247 - 𝗙𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗗𝗶𝗕𝗶𝗮𝘀𝗲 ①

Here’s the recipe for the flu.. Must Watch👇🏽👇🏽 https://t.co/ObRywy3NNy

Video Transcript AI Summary
This is a recipe for the flu bomb, which can be used for various respiratory issues like bronchitis, asthma, and the flu. The ingredients include garlic, ginger, eucalyptus or tea tree oil, cayenne pepper, lemon, honey, and hot water. The measurements are half a clove of garlic, a quarter teaspoon of ginger, 1 drop of eucalyptus or tea tree oil, a quarter teaspoon of cayenne pepper, half a lemon, and approximately 1 teaspoon of honey. Mix these ingredients in about a third of a cup of hot water. Take this mixture three times a day for three days when dealing with a flu, cold, or sinus issue.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm going to give you the recipe for the flu bomb. The flu bomb can be used for bronchitis, it can be used for asthma, it can be used for the flu. It can be used for pleurisy. It can be used for pneumonia. It can be used for sinus or a head cold. Cold. The first ingredient is garlic. Some people can only handle half sec garlic, so it depends what you can handle. Ginger, about a quarter of a teaspoon. Foods. Eucalyptus oil. If you don't have eucalyptus oil, you can use tea tree oil, and it's 1 drop. Next ingredient is cayenne pepper, quarter of a teaspoon. Lemon. Half a lemon. Last ingredient is honey, and, usually, it's approximately 1 teaspoon. You mix fat in about a third of a cup of hot water. If someone has a flu or a cold or a sinus, it's usually taking one of those 3 times a pain. Usually, by the 3rd day, you don't need it anymore.

@FredDiBiase247 - 𝗙𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗗𝗶𝗕𝗶𝗮𝘀𝗲 ①

Follow @FredDiBiase247 for more content like this👆🏽👆🏽

Inversionism
Posted - September 18, 2023 at 2:10 AM
Saved - September 18, 2023 at 6:50 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The disappearance of the flu for two consecutive years, replaced by COVID, raises questions about the effectiveness of measures like masks and lockdowns. If these measures truly eradicated the flu but failed to protect against COVID, it suggests testing fraud and a hidden agenda behind the pandemic. The link provides further information.

@Inversionism - Inversionism

Before anyone says another word about COVID, vaccine efficacy and booster shots, or a supposed impending pandemic going into the fall/winter, you need to explain to me in thorough scientifically substantiated detail exactly how the flu vanished for 2 years straight and was replaced by supposed COVID with equivalent numbers. If you claim it was masks, social distancing, hand sanitizer, lockdowns, or whatever other cope you have been told to believe, you need to provide an RCT demonstrating that it's efficacious enough to stop one of the most common viral illness for 2 years, but also not do anything to protect against COVID simultaneously. Until it's proven to me beyond any doubt that those measures made the flu vanish but didn't do anything for COVID, then I'm going to definitively declare that the entire COVID pandemic is predicated on RT-PCR and other testing fraud, and it was all a mass psyop to goad you into taking a bioweapon vaccine to make pharmaceutical companies billions of dollars, and perhaps some other nefarious intentions pertaining to fertility and depopulation agendas. Any takers? I'll wait.

VictorFromDE
Posted - November 22, 2023 at 5:14 AM
Saved - November 23, 2023 at 8:44 PM

@VictorFromDE - Victor Scott

The “Spanish Flu” pandemic was started by vaccines and then continued by vaccines as fearful people were told that vaccines were the solution. There was no “flu” or contagion. Vaccines created with “vaccine lymph” (a term you should look up) from horses. https://t.co/JU7MtxLFdn

Video Transcript AI Summary
Between 1918 and 20, a pandemic known as the Spanish flu caused the deaths of 50 million people and infected one-third of the world population. Contrary to its name, it did not originate in Spain and was not a flu virus. Instead, it was a bacteria that caused severe pneumonia. Autopsies revealed that bacterial pneumonia was responsible for at least 92.77% of the deaths. The outbreak began at a military base in Fort Riley, Kansas, where soldiers were injected with an experimental bacterial meningitis vaccine. This vaccine experiment went terribly wrong, but it was disguised as the Spanish flu to hide the truth.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Between 1918 and 20, an estimate of 50,000,000 people died. One third of the entire world population was infected. It is believed to be the greatest pandemic the world has ever experienced, worse even than the medieval black clash. Speaker 1: There are several Speaker 0: very interesting things Speaker 1: about the Spanish flu. Speaker 0: First of all, it didn't start in Spain. Secondly, There wasn't a flu. There's more. But let's start with these 2, shall we? If it didn't start in Spain, Then where did it? In the US. If it wasn't a flu virus, what was it? It was a bacteria that caused severe and, in most cases, lethal pneumonia. According To a 2008 National Institute of Health paper, bacterial pneumonia was the killer in a minimum of 92.7 7% of the autopsies were viewed. So why do we call it the Spanish flu? As as a decoy, a smokescreen to hide the truth. Why? Because the truth So hideous, most people prefer to hear a convenient lie. The first cases of bacterial pneumonia in 1918, traced back to a military base in Fort Riley, Kansas. Long story short, During the first half of nineteen eighteen, an experimental bacterial meningitis vaccine cultured in horses by the Rockefeller Institute For Medical Research in New York, now the Rockefeller University, was injected into soldiers at thought Riley. The so called Spanish flu was a vaccine experiment done horribly wrong. Well, That's what we, the people, would say. The kabob would refer to it differently. They would call it an experiment with
TheMilkBarTV
Posted - December 10, 2023 at 1:15 PM
Saved - December 11, 2023 at 6:05 PM

@TheMilkBarTV - MilkBarTV

Covid vaccine mass hysteria was a very real thing! 👇👇 https://t.co/nGRfuPmAnu

Video Transcript AI Summary
A speaker expresses their excitement about getting the COVID-19 vaccine and encourages others to trust it. They mention that the vaccine is 90% effective and discuss the expected side effects. Another speaker shares their personal experience with Bell's palsy but still supports getting vaccinated. They highlight the importance of vaccination during hurricane season. The speakers urge people to get vaccinated and criticize those who spread misinformation on social media. They also mention the risk of myocarditis associated with the vaccine. Overall, the video emphasizes the benefits and importance of getting vaccinated against COVID-19.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me hear Speaker 1: A vaccine is on the way, Zaddy. Let's do it. Getting that shot Really was an amazing feeling. It it it hits you. DMC, I will inspire. Time for us to trust I'm hearing from Speaker 2: the dead. Speaker 1: Not debate the vaccine. Believe it's safe to take. 9 out of 10 people won't get sick. That's 90% effective and legit. Speaker 3: Side effects that people experience with vaccines, which we all have come to expect a sign that the vaccine's doing what it should. Speaker 0: I've been diagnosed with Bell's palsy, which is paralysis on one side of the face, but I have to say that I would do it again I'm hearing from the gentleman. Be tired before we have to do. Vaccine. Speaker 2: If this is appealing to you, just think of this when you think of vaccination. I'm Speaker 0: hearing from the tenant. The same category when it comes to, COVID vaccines and infections. I've had the same number as well. And I wear my vaccinated necklace all the time to say I'm vaccinated. Speaker 2: I'm getting a very good feeling about vaccination right this month. The preparing for hurricane season is to get vaccinated I'm hearing from the gentleman. Now everything is more complicated if you're not vaccinated. A hurricane and a natural disaster hits. Speaker 0: I'm hearing from the dead. See. Mister Biden, bring my vaccine. Keep me protected from COVID nineteen. Speaker 1: Get the vaccine. Get the vaccine. Speaker 0: Just get the vaccine. Roll the up and get the vaccine. And tell your friend on Facebook Stick to jewelry. Fundamentally a cult. It's a cult in every sense, and now it appears to be a sort of Jim Jones era cult. Speaker 3: That nasty jelly bean represents the risk of getting myocarditis if you have the vaccine. Speaker 1: A death call. Speaker 0: A death call.
I_Am_JohnCullen
Posted - December 25, 2023 at 11:53 PM
Saved - December 26, 2023 at 12:26 AM

@I_Am_JohnCullen - John Cullen

At some point, it's not an accident. It's purposeful avoidance. Is it the hat? It seems @TheVivaFrei is actively avoiding my work. Judge for yourselves: https://t.co/eQNiT5KabM

@thevivafrei - Viva Frei

Two questions: Why did they not count flu deaths in 2020-2021? And what is the best explanation for why flu deaths were wildly down during Covid? I’ve read all explanations. What is the most plausible explanation? Because I’m inclined to think that they were just counting all flu deaths as Covid deaths.

iluminatibot
Posted - January 14, 2024 at 2:05 AM
Saved - January 14, 2024 at 3:17 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

Here's the recipe for the flu Must Watch https://t.co/oFKCW0U6jo

Video Transcript AI Summary
This is a recipe for a natural remedy called the flu bomb, which can be used for various respiratory conditions like bronchitis, asthma, the flu, pleurisy, pneumonia, sinus or head cold. The ingredients include garlic, ginger, eucalyptus or tea tree oil, cayenne pepper, lemon, and honey. The recommended dosage is three times a day for flu, cold, or sinus symptoms. Typically, it is no longer needed after the third day.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm going to give you the recipe for the flu bomb. The flu bomb can be used for bronchitis. It can be used for asthma. It can be used for the flu. It can be used for pleurisy. It can be used for pneumonia. It can be used for sinus or a head cold. The first ingredient is garlic. Some people can only handle half that garlic. So it depends what you can handle. Ginger, about a quarter of a teaspoon. Eucalyptus oil. If you don't have eucalyptus on. You can use tea tree oil, and it's 1 drop. Next ingredient is cayenne pepper, quarter of a teaspoon lemon, half a lemon. The last ingredient is honey, and usually it's approximately 1 teaspoon. You mix that in about a third of a cup of hot water. If someone has a flu or a cold or a sinus, it's usually taking one of those 3 times a day. Usually, by the 3rd day, if you don't need it anymore.
MikeBenzCyber
Posted - March 16, 2024 at 2:35 AM
Saved - March 16, 2024 at 5:12 PM

@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz

No more fatal than the flu, no more infectious than flu, no more longlasting symptoms than the flu, oh and the flu which had existed since the dawn of mankind literally completely disappeared w/ statistically zero new people getting flu during Covid

@guardian - The Guardian

Time to stop using term ‘long Covid’ as symptoms are no worse than those after flu, study finds https://www.theguardian.com/society/2024/mar/15/long-covid-symptoms-flu-cold?utm_term=Autofeed&CMP=twt_gu&utm_medium&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1710464766

Time to stop using term ‘long Covid’ as symptoms no worse than those after flu, Queensland’s chief health officer says Researchers compared the symptoms and impairment of Covid and influenza patients a year after they tested positive theguardian.com
iluminatibot
Posted - April 22, 2024 at 8:54 AM
Saved - April 22, 2024 at 11:42 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

Here's the recipe for the flu Must Watch https://t.co/bBaorKuad1

Video Transcript AI Summary
Recipe for the flu bomb: garlic, ginger, eucalyptus oil (or tea tree oil), cayenne pepper, lemon, and honey in hot water. Adjust garlic amount to preference. Take 3 times a day for flu, cold, or sinus issues, usually for 3 days.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm going to give you the recipe for the flu bomb. The flu bomb can be used for bronchitis, it can be used for asthma, it can be used for the flu, it can be used for pleurisy. It can be used for pneumonia. It can be used for sinus or a head cold. The first ingredient is garlic. Some people can only handle half that garlic so it depends what you can handle. Ginger, about a quarter of a teaspoon. Eucalyptus oil, if you don't have eucalyptus oil, you can use tea tree oil. And it's one drop. Next ingredient is cayenne pepper, quarter of a teaspoon. Lemon, half a lemon. The last ingredient is honey and usually it's approximately 1 teaspoon. You mix that in about a third of a cup of hot water. If someone has a flu or a cold or a sinus, it's usually taking one of those 3 times a day. Usually by the 3rd day you don't need it anymore.
Alec_Zeck
Posted - May 8, 2024 at 4:19 PM
Saved - May 9, 2024 at 10:47 PM

@Alec_Zeck - D. Alec Zeck

Zero evidence of a pandemic. Zero. None. Zilch. There was nothing new happening except fear, which led to the psychosomatic development of symptoms. https://t.co/VrHORR8aBo

Video Transcript AI Summary
In recent years, global mortality rates have been lower compared to the past 50 years, with a spike in 2018 due to new vaccines. Despite claims of a deadly pandemic, mortality rates have remained lower than in 1952. People were getting sick, but not dying at alarming rates. This raises questions about the severity of the pandemic.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Every year, 7.6 people on average per 1,000 die. We have the numbers. They were lower than the last 50 years. 2018 had a much higher one, and they've been lower after the 2021 because the jabs came out were a little bit higher. There was nothing out of the ordinary worldwide going on. Now if you had a pandemic, you would think that would've went from 7.6 to at least 7.9, 8.1, but it was actually 9.5 back in 1952 and much higher and higher. So now we have the numbers. So anyone who says, no. No. People were getting sick. People were getting sick. You're like, people always get sick, but nobody was dying. How did you have a deadly pandemic if the worldwide mortality rates are lower than the last 40 years? Like, well, how? Right.
iluminatibot
Posted - May 20, 2024 at 1:05 AM
Saved - May 20, 2024 at 1:38 AM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

Covid-19 was the biggest scam in history https://t.co/6s31ZpwEUP

Video Transcript AI Summary
Coronavirus was isolated in 1965 and quickly identified as a pathogen for experimentation. In 1966, the first COV model was used in human manipulation experiments. By 1990, Pfizer patented a spike protein vaccine for coronavirus. Research showed vaccines were ineffective due to the virus mutating rapidly. In 2002, the University of North Carolina patented an infectious replication defective clone of coronavirus, funded by Anthony Fauci. This work preceded SARS 1.0 by a year, suggesting engineered origins.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Most of you don't know that coronavirus as a model of a pathogen was isolated in 1965. Coronavirus was identified in 1965 as one of the first infectious replicatable viral models that could be used to modify a series of other experiences of the human condition that was isolated once upon a time associated with the common cold. But what's particularly interesting about its isolation in 1965 was that it was immediately identified as a pathogen that could be used and modified for a whole host of reasons. And you heard me correctly. That was 1965. And by the way, these slides are public domain. You're welcome to look at every single reference. Every comment that I made is based on published material, so do make sure that you look at those references. But in 1966, the very first COV coronavirus model was used as a transatlantic biological experiment in human manipulation. And you heard the date, 1966. I hope you're getting the point of what I'm saying. This is not an overnight thing. This is actually something that's been long in the making. A year before I was born, we had the first transatlantic coronavirus data sharing experiment between the United States and the United Kingdom. And in 1967, the year I was born, we did the first human trials on inoculating people with modified coronavirus. Isn't that amazing? 56 years ago, the overnight success of a pathogen that's been 56 years in engineering, and I want that to chill with all of you. Where were we when we human civilization when we thought it was an acceptable thing to do to take a pathogen for the United States and infect the world with it? Where was that conversation, and what should have been that conversation in 1967? That conversation wasn't had. Ironically, the common cold was turned into a chimera in the 19 seventies, And in 1975, 1976, and 1977, we started figuring out how to modify coronavirus by putting it into different animals, pigs and dogs. And not surprisingly, by the time we got to 1990, we found out that coronavirus as a infectious agent was an industrial problem for 2 primary industries, the industries of dogs and pigs. Dog breeders and pigs found that coronavirus created gastrointestinal problems, and that became the basis for Pfizer's first spike protein vaccine patent filed, are you ready for this, in 1990. Did you hear what I just said? 1990, operation warp speed? I'm sorry. Where's the warp and the speed? Pfizer, 1990, the very first spike protein vaccine for coronavirus. Isn't that fascinating? Isn't it fascinating that we were we were told that, well, the spike protein is a new thing. We just found out that that's the problem. No. As a matter of fact, we didn't just find out it was not just now now the problem. We found that out in 1990 and filed the first patents on vaccines in 1990 for the spike protein of coronavirus. And who would have thought? Pfizer, clearly the innocent organization that does nothing but promote human health. Clearly, Pfizer, the organization that has not bought the votes in this chamber and at every chamber of every government around the world, not that Pfizer. Certainly, they wouldn't have had anything to do with this. But, oh, yes. They did. And in 1990, they found out that there was a problem with vaccines. They didn't work. Do you know why they didn't work? It turns out that coronavirus is a very malleable model. It transforms and it changes and it mutates over time. As a matter of fact, every publication on vaccines for coronavirus from 1990 until 2018, every single publication concluded that coronavirus escapes the vaccine impulse because it modifies and mutates too quickly for vaccines to be effective. And since 1990 to 2018, that is the published science, ladies and gentlemen. That's following the science. Following the science is their own indictment of their own programs that said it doesn't work, And there are thousands of publications to that fact, not a few 100, and not paid for by pharmaceutical companies. These are publications that are independent scientific research that shows unequivocally, including efforts of the chimera modifications made by Ralph Barrick and the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, all of them show vaccines do not work on coronavirus. That's the science, and that science has never been disputed. But then we had an interesting development in 2002, and this data is most important because in 2002, the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill patented, and I quote, an infectious replication defective clone of coronavirus. Listen to those words, infectious replication defective. What does that phrase actually mean? For those of you not familiar with language, let me unpack it for you. But not have collateral damage to other individuals. That's what infectious replication defective means, And that patent was filed in 2002 on work funded by NIAID's Anthony Fauci from 1999 to 2002, and that work, patented at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, mysteriously preceded SARS 1.0 by a year. Dave, are you suggesting that SARS 1.0 wasn't from a wet market in Wuhan? Are you suggesting it might have come from a laboratory in the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill? No. I'm not suggesting it. I'm telling you that's the facts. We engineered SARS. SARS is not a naturally occurring phenomenon. The naturally occurring phenomenon is called the common cold. It's called influenza like illness. It's called gastroenteritis. That's the naturally occurring coronavirus. SARS is the research developed by humans weaponizing a life system model to actually attack human beings, and they patented it in 2002. And in 2003,
wolsned
Posted - May 29, 2024 at 7:10 AM
Saved - May 30, 2024 at 12:35 PM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

Every aspect of COVID was a lie. https://t.co/pKz7YQpY8i

toobaffled
Posted - June 27, 2024 at 10:32 AM
Saved - June 27, 2024 at 2:33 PM

@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”

Exactly what @GVDBossche predicted would happen 👇 Sydney is getting sicker by the day with new figures showing a spike in the flu, as COVID levels remain high. Now, there are concerns we could be seeing the start of a pneumonia epidemic. 💉☠️💉☠️💉☠️💉💉☠️💉☠️💉 https://t.co/6ZHJ0N3Wtw

Video Transcript AI Summary
Sydney is experiencing a rise in flu cases alongside high COVID levels, sparking concerns of a potential pneumonia epidemic. Emergency visits for flu symptoms have surged by 26% in the past week, with over 7,000 positive cases, mainly in western and southwestern Sydney. COVID cases are also on the rise, with over 5,000 positive tests, predominantly in the west and southwest. Disturbing pneumonia figures suggest an epidemic, occurring every 3 to 5 years. Authorities advise good hygiene and staying home when sick.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sydney is getting sicker by the day with new figures showing a spike in the flu as COVID levels remain high. And now there are concerns we could be seeing the start of a pneumonia epidemic. Paul Kadak has Speaker 1: more. Since last month, there's been a big rise in the number of people going to emergency for flu like symptoms with flu test confirmations surging 26% just in the past week with close to 7,000 people testing positive. Almost half that total are in western and southwestern Sydney. Now there's also concern about COVID 19. In the last week, labs have confirmed more than five 1,000 people are COVID positive. And once again, it's the west and southwest recording the most infections with northern Sydney not far behind. And there are disturbing new figures tonight on pneumonia. These graphs show the number of cases over the past 5 years for babies, children, and adults, and these are the pneumonia cases in just the last 6 months. Authorities say that indicates an epidemic, which usually happens every 3 to 5 years. Tonight, they're urging people to practice good hygiene and stay home if you're unwell. Mark? Speaker 0: Paul. Thank you.
stkirsch
Posted - August 6, 2024 at 9:00 PM
Saved - August 7, 2024 at 8:54 PM

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

Paper showing COVID and flu vaccines do NOT reduce hospitalization was published today in PrePrints. https://kirschsubstack.com/p/paper-showing-covid-and-flu-vaccines?r=o7iqo&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Paper showing COVID and flu vaccines do NOT reduce hospitalization was published today We immediately got four offers from top journals to submit for publication in their journals. Also, the Medicare data confirms the Czech data that vaccine toxicity varies by brand! kirschsubstack.com
TTAVOfficial
Posted - October 15, 2024 at 8:03 PM
Saved - October 16, 2024 at 12:45 PM

@TTAVOfficial - The Truth About Vaccines

As you can see, the flu shot is full of toxic chemicals... And not to mention there is evidence the flu vaccine accelerates coronavirus. https://t.co/t3Gyw799z1

ABridgen
Posted - October 17, 2024 at 9:20 AM
Saved - October 17, 2024 at 12:03 PM

@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen

Amazing that for the first time in recorded history flu cases almost disappeared during the ‘Covid 19 pandemic.’ Of course they did. https://t.co/KKPXrefPOA

_APWK_
Posted - January 24, 2025 at 8:59 PM
Saved - January 25, 2025 at 3:04 AM

@_APWK_ - Luiz

Want to start understanding how "viruses" not exist? This is a good place to start: https://t.co/nLTCrgO1Uf

Video Transcript AI Summary
Do you have an open mind? Consider that we live in a toxic world, where our cells respond to poisons by packaging and releasing damaged genetic material, called exosomes. This contrasts with the established theory of viruses, which are seen as non-living entities that can cause illness. The coronavirus emerged when a respiratory illness was linked to a new RNA fragment found in patients. Testing methods, like PCR, amplify genetic material, but their arbitrary cutoff points can lead to misleading results. Cases like the Diamond Princess cruise ship show conflicting test results among close contacts, challenging the infectious virus theory. Many who test positive remain asymptomatic, and some fluctuate between positive and negative results. This raises questions about the reliability of PCR tests and whether exosomes could be misidentified as viruses. Ultimately, how confident are you in these tests? Would you choose to be tested?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you have an open mind? Can you suspend judgment for a moment? Most people can't. But what if your job depends on it? What if the freedom to hug people depends on it? What if your life depends on it? Here's a new theory. 1st, consider that we live in a world where everything is toxic. The soil, the water, the air, our food, even our medicines are toxic. Even stress can be toxic. Now imagine that all these toxins are poisonous to us on a cellular level. Imagine that our cells have a defense and respond to the situation. Poisoned genetic material, either RNA or DNA, is packaged up and sent out of the cell in tiny balls of protein. Let's call these balls of genetic material exosomes. Let's imagine that exosomes can act as messages to alert other cells of a particular poison, and so all throughout the body more and more cells package up the poisoned material and release it. Also, at certain times of the year due to temperature cycles, humans tend to purge a high number of these poisons genetic materials out of the body resulting in symptoms of illness. These exosomes neither cause illness nor are they infectious, though they do appear to spread throughout the body. Now that's exosome theory. Let's move on to the established theory of viruses. Viruses are generally regarded as not alive. They have no cellular structure and do not reproduce on their own, though we do have trillions of them inside our bodies. They are tiny bits of genetic material, either RNA or DNA, packaged in tiny protein balls that appear to exit and enter cells. Sound familiar? We believe that some of these entities are infectious and pathogenic, transmitting amongst humans and reproducing inside our bodies, causing illness and death. So let's look at the situation for this coronavirus and compare what is happening to these two theories. Let's first consider the origin story of the coronavirus. A group of people had a respiratory illness unresolved by antibiotics, so medical officials began looking, of course, for a virus. What they eventually found under the electron microscope were small protein balls being excreted by the cell. Okay. First comparison. This would make sense in both exosome theory and virus theory. Then they searched for and found an RNA fragment that they had not seen before in some of these patients. This would make sense in both exosome theory and virus theory. Now they did not prove that they could infect somebody or an animal with a purified form of this so called virus. They simply assumed that this RNA fragment was the cause of the illness they saw in some patients, and they assumed it was contagious. So do you know how the tests work? It's not a binary test like a pregnancy test. It's called a PCR test, and it involves amplifying genetic material by doubling it in dozens of cycles until you have billions or trillions of the original molecules, and then using those results to determine if you have enough of the identified RNA fragment to be considered positive. Here's the thing. At a certain point of amplification, every single person would test positive. They use an arbitrary cutoff point where they stop doubling the material. That cutoff point is different amongst different tests for COVID 19. In fact, there were 10 different cutoff points amongst 33 tests approved by the FDA. Seems a little strange. Right? You might find it interesting that the Nobel Prize winning inventor of the test did not believe it should be used to diagnose infectious illness, and perhaps you've heard about some of the problems with the test, such as the high rate of false positives. But in any case, let's say that after 37 times of doubling a specific genetic material they found in your body, they determine that you have enough of the RNA they are looking for to be considered positive. This could make sense in both exosome theory and virus theory, but clearly there are clusters of people getting ill. Look at New York City. It must be a virus. However, if you are being poisoned by something in your environment, it's likely people near you are too. And if we commonly purge these poisons during specific times of the year, many people may have symptoms of illness all at once. This fits either theory. Now, here's where things get interesting. Let's go to the Diamond Princess cruise ship situation. Did you know that people who were bunked together for days had conflicting positive and negative tests? How could one person have this highly infectious illness, but not transmit it to somebody bunking with them for days? This would make sense in exosome theory, where the balls of RNA are not contagious, but it would not make sense for virus theory where the balls of RNA are supposed to be highly infectious. Let's take a look at the first case of transmission in Illinois. A woman traveled to Wuhan, came back, and both she and her chronically ill husband ended up testing positive. Medical authorities then tracked over 300 people who had had close contact with them to see who acquired the virus. And guess what? 0 positives. This again would make sense in exosome theory since exosomes are not contagious, but it would not make sense for virus theory where this is supposed to be an infectious virus. In fact, do you know that there are many documented cases all around the world of patients testing positive for this RNA fragment with no relevant travel history and no known possible contact with somebody who was infected? These were people in the middle of nowhere, early on in this whole crisis, who suddenly were testing positive. This would make sense again in exosome theory, where the RNA is being produced as an immune response within our cells, but it would not make sense for virus theory where you are supposed to have had contact with somebody with the virus. What about the high levels of people testing positive who don't get sick? In fact, 80% of people testing positive are either asymptomatic or have slight cold symptoms. Why? This would make sense in exosome theory since the RNA fragments are not the cause of the illness. But it would not make sense for virus theory where this virus is supposed to cause the illness. Things get even stranger. Did you know that some people go from testing positive to testing negative to testing positive again in a matter of days. That would make sense for exosome theory, where perhaps the cells are simply releasing more or less of these exosomes depending on certain conditions. But it doesn't make sense in virus theory, where you are supposedly infected until you have rid yourself of the virus. So which of these theories seems more likely to you? What if you heard that there are virologists who believe that viruses are actually exosomes? What if I told you that doctors and other scientific experts also believe this? Ultimately, regardless of which theory you believe in at this point, the established infectious virus theory or the emerging theory of exosomes, how confident are you in the PCR test? Are you really interested in having your life hinge on the results you get from this potentially meaningless test? Do you want your loved ones tested? Do you want to be tested? Or shall we perhaps refuse the test?
JoshWalkos
Posted - April 10, 2025 at 1:28 AM
Saved - October 19, 2025 at 12:31 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m checking how the flu shot is performing this year. The study shows cumulative influenza incidence rose faster among the vaccinated than the unvaccinated—does that mean it’s not working? Post 2: Study:

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Let’s check in on how the flu shot is working this year. “over the course of the study the cumulative incidence of influenza increased more rapidly among the vaccinated than the unvaccinated.” Does that mean it working or no?

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Study: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.01.30.25321421v3

Effectiveness of the Influenza Vaccine During the 2024-2025 Respiratory Viral Season medRxiv - The Preprint Server for Health Sciences medrxiv.org
I_Am_JohnCullen
Posted - April 15, 2025 at 4:17 PM
Saved - April 16, 2025 at 1:54 AM

@I_Am_JohnCullen - John Cullen 🐓

What if the vaccines weren't really for COVID, but were for a weaponized version of bird flu, that Dr Fauci did Gain of Function on, back in 2014? What would that mean? https://t.co/due63havvH

goddeketal
Posted - April 18, 2025 at 4:20 PM
Saved - April 18, 2025 at 11:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared insights on how the pandemic was manipulated for power, detailing staged events, misleading statistics, and psychological tactics used to instill fear. I discussed the false narratives around asymptomatic spread, the inflation of COVID death counts, and the suppression of effective treatments to promote vaccines. The media played a crucial role in perpetuating panic, while dissent was silenced. Ultimately, I argued that the pandemic served as a pretext for a broader agenda, reshaping society under elite control, rather than focusing on public health.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

🧵HOW THEY CREATED THE FAKE PANDEMIC They fooled the world, crashed economies, censored truth, and rewrote science overnight. Here's exactly how they turned fear, lies, and propaganda into the greatest power grab of our time. ⬇️ A THREAD ⬇️ https://t.co/4wWONfONjy

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

1. Staged Wuhan Panic: China kicked off the scare with choreographed "collapse in the street" videos. People dramatically keeling over in Wuhan, something never seen elsewhere. Even WHO called these collapses "atypical." It was pure psy-op theater to ignite global fear. https://t.co/v7vaoBXXM4

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

2. Bogus PCR cases: A phony testing regime built the “casedemic.” The German cirologist @c_drosten introduced a PCR test that can’t diagnose infection – cranked to excessive cycle thresholds so it flagged mostly false positives. Millions of healthy people were branded “dangerous COVID cases,” juicing the numbers to justify lockdowns.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

3. “Asymptomatic spread” myth: They pushed the lie that healthy people could silently infect others, to justify testing and restricting those with no symptoms. But there is no such thing as asymptomatic transmission. This was propaganda to lock down the healthy and mask toddlers. What many people don’t know is that the person who came up with the lie of asymptomatic transmission is the same one who created the COVID PCR protocol: the German virologist Christian Drosten.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

4. Coordinated Narrative Shift on COVID: On Feb 1, 2020, Fauci, Drosten, Andersen & others had a secret call. They admitted COVID might be lab-made. Within days, they flipped, pushed the natural origin lie, and Andersen got millions in grants. Science was replaced with narrative. https://t.co/r4fqdyx9Ip

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

5. Weaponized psychology: Governments literally hired behavioral psychologists to crank up the fear. In the UK, the SPI-B team admit they used “unethical” fear tactics – one scientist called it “totalitarian… not ethical”​ – to increase compliance. Leaked documents show officials discussing how to frighten the public into obedience. This was a deliberate fear pandemic, not a viral one.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

6. Needed fake mortality: The sniffles were never going to kill enough people to sustain panic. To maintain the illusion of a deadly pandemic, they needed excess mortality data. So they cooked the books to create the appearance of mass death (see next points). COVID’s true infection fatality rate (~0.2% globally) is akin to a bad flu – so they had to inflate the body count by any means.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

7. Manufactured hysteria illness: Since “mild cold symptoms” wouldn’t deliver the death spike they needed, authorities terrorized everyone to trigger mass psychogenic illness – essentially people getting sick from fear​ via chronically elevated cortisol levels. These elevated levels suppress immunity; anxiety and lockdown harms caused spikes in deaths (heart attacks, overdoses) that they then counted as “COVID.” It was a self-fulfilling pandemic of fear.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

8. 24/7 media terror: They blasted fear propaganda non-stop. News tickers ran running death tolls, every hospital incident became front-page news, and worst-case models dominated headlines. Governments fed the panic with lurid warnings (Boris Johnson claiming “bodies piled high” if restrictions lifted). By design, the public was kept in a state of constant fear. Objective risk (median COVID age ~80) was ignored to create the impression anyone could drop dead tomorrow.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

9. Flu cases relabeled as COVID: Flu virtually disappeared. Instead of celebrating the end of flu, officials pretended it was due to COVID measures – an absurd lie while COVID supposedly ran rampant. They simply rebranded the flu (and other respiratory illnesses) as “COVID” to inflate the pandemic.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

10. Every death counted as COVID: If you died in a car crash but tested positive, it was marked as a COVID death. Guidelines said even if the cause was clearly unrelated, it still counted. Hospitals were told to list deaths as COVID if the patient had ever tested positive or was merely suspected. Even those who died within two weeks of a positive test were included. This wildly inflated the stats by labeling non-COVID deaths as COVID.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

11. Financial incentives to inflate deaths: Hospitals had a perverse monetary motive to jack up COVID diagnoses. In the US, thanks to emergency payouts, a COVID patient on a ventilator could bring in ~$40,000 – roughly triple the normal reimbursement. Medicare’s 20% bonus for COVID cases and ventilator bonuses meant big $$$ for hospitals that labeled patients as COVID and put them on vents. This incentivized over-treatment and even negligence (e.g. unnecessary venting with ~90% fatality once intubated). It literally paid to have more COVID deaths.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

12. Early treatments banned: They aggressively suppressed effective therapies to protect the vaccine rollout. Doctors using ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, or vitamin D were vilified. The Lancet published a fake HCQ study (later retracted) that halted global trials. Meanwhile, they pushed toxic and expensive remdesivir. Even monoclonal antibodies and IV vitamin C were restricted. Denying real treatment let patients worsen, driving deaths and fear, all to pave the way for their “miracle” vaccines.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

13. Fake hospital footage & crisis actors: Media showed us scenes of overflowing hospitals – often misleading or outright fake. Example: CBS News was caught using video of a packed Italian ICU while reporting on NYC’s COVID situation​, implying New York hospitals were overrun. They called it an “editing mistake.” Similar stunts happened worldwide (recycling old disaster photos, staging scenes). Meanwhile, many hospitals were actually so empty (elective care canceled) that nurses had time for TikTok dance videos. The “overwhelmed hospitals” narrative was largely a scripted show to panic the public.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

14. Draconian lockdowns with no benefit: They imposed China-style society-wide lockdowns – a blunt instrument never recommended in prior pandemic plans. Small businesses, schools, churches all shuttered by government decree. The result was a devastating economic and social harm, with no proven mortality benefit.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

15. “Vaccines are the only way out”: After stoking panic and crushing cures, they presented the magic solution – rushed mRNA vaccines. Self-proclaimed health experts like Bill Gates promised these experimental shots were 95% effective and safe, that vaccination would end the pandemic. Governments shoveled billions to Pharma and granted them blanket immunity from liability for any harms. They then coerced the public via mandates and “passport” systems. It was a massive human experiment, using fear to sell acceptance of a novel vaccine platform and to cement a new level of state and corporate control over individual bodies.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

16. Lies about vaccine efficacy: They did not hesitate to lie. The CDC Director herself falsely claimed “vaccinated people do not carry the virus”​ and won’t get sick. President Biden said “you’re not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations.” These statements were patently false – breakthrough infections happened by the millions, and studies showed vaccinated individuals can spread COVID​. They knowingly oversold the vaccines to bully people into compliance, then kept changing the story (“you need a booster…actually 3 boosters…”). Fun fact: If you died within two weeks of a positive PCR test, you were counted as a COVID death — no questions asked. But if you died within two weeks of the vaccine? “Doesn’t count, it hadn’t kicked in yet.” One rule to inflate fear, another to protect the narrative.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

17. Goalposts forever shifting: Nothing was ever temporary. “15 days to slow the spread” turned into 15 months of restrictions​. They said masks were unnecessary – then mandated two masks. They said lockdowns would be one-time – then reimposed them repeatedly. They promised “herd immunity” at 70% vaccinated – then moved the target. Each time the public met one demand, authorities doubled back and added more, betraying every assurance. This psychological abuse kept societies off-balance and prolongued the emergency powers indefinitely.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

18. Crushing and punishing dissent: Any expert or citizen who questioned the narrative was attacked. High-profile scientists who proposed focused protection (the Great Barrington Declaration) were subjected to a secret campaign by NIH officials calling for a “quick and devastating takedown” of them​. Doctors who saved patients with ivermectin or other protocols were stripped of licenses. Online skeptic communities were purged from Facebook , Twitter, and YouTube. Whistleblowers (nurses, data analysts) faced gag orders. The establishment used character assassination and censorship to maintain the illusion of unanimous “Science” support, quashing debate through intimidation.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

19. Data rigging to promote vaccines: When vaccines rolled out, they manipulated statistics to credit them. In May 2021 the CDC quietly stopped tracking COVID cases among vaccinated people unless hospitalized or dead​. Tens of thousands of breakthrough infections disappeared from the data. By counting every case in unvaccinated but ignoring most in vaccinated, they fabricated a narrative that “almost only the unvaccinated” were getting sick. This was a blatant data trick to prop up vaccine efficacy and fuel scapegoating of the unvaccinated.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

20. Ever-changing variants to extend fear: Just as the original wave waned, they hyped new “variants of concern” – Alpha, Delta, Omicron – to keep fear alive, and then blamed it on the unvaccinated. Each variant became the next reason for booster shots and continued restrictions. Media dutifully pumped scary stories (“Delta hitting young people”, “Omicron evades immunity”) with little context. It was a moving target to prevent the public from relaxing. By the time people caught on that each variant was milder than advertised, another one was on the horizon. The endless variants ensured the panic carousel kept spinning.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

21. Excess mortality surged post-vaccination: After mass vaccination campaigns, excess deaths rose dramatically, and continue even now. Authorities blamed everything from heatwaves to gardening and “climate anxiety,” desperately avoiding the most obvious cause: the jab itself. https://t.co/E7pam6YzfC

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

22. Inventing "Long COVID": As vaccine injuries surged, authorities conveniently introduced "Long COVID", a vague, catch-all diagnosis. Its broad, ambiguous symptoms perfectly matched common post-vaccination side effects, masking the truth behind escalating injuries. https://t.co/Q7JvQbAOeO

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

23. Conveniently “ending” the pandemic: After three years of orchestrated chaos, they abruptly declared the crisis over – not because of any scientific breakthrough, but for political convenience. The WHO ended the global emergency in May 2023, even as excess mortality remained high. Suddenly, COVID coverage vanished. Leaders who imposed tyranny moved on to the next agenda (Ukraine, climate) without apology or accountability. The pandemic theater ended when its architects chose to shift focus — not when the virus faded. Now they want amnesty for terrorizing citizens for years.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

24. Engineered for the Great Reset: In sum, the “pandemic” was a planned global power grab – a pretext for a new world order. Consider that in October 2019, globalists (WEF/Gates) ran Event 201, a tabletop exercise simulating a coronavirus pandemic that crashes economies and prompts draconian measures​. Sound familiar? Just months later, COVID-19 hit and governments executed in lockstep the very playbook discussed. Klaus Schwab of the WEF openly called COVID-19 a “rare but narrow window” to impose the Great Reset of society. From lockdowns to digital IDs, the pandemic fulfilled a wish-list of authoritarian controls. This was never about public health – it was about exploiting a virus to restructure society under elite rule. The “fake pandemic” narrative has been proven by each of these hard facts, and history will remember it as one of the greatest frauds ever perpetrated. Thank you for reading this thread and please give it a share and me a follow if you found it informative. Much appreciated.

Video Transcript AI Summary
As a young generation, we are grateful to penetrate cabinets. The change can be shaped by us. We have to prepare for a more angry world by taking action to create a fairer world. I see the need for a great reset. People assume we are just going back to the good old world, but this is fiction. It will not happen. There is only one way this pandemic is going to go: it's going to get worse and worse and worse. The next crisis is already waiting for us, and it is the climate crisis.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As a young generation like prime minister Trudeau, half of this cabinet are actually young noble leaders of the world are grateful. We penetrate the cabinets. The change is not just happening. The change can be shaped by us. We have to prepare for a more angry world. How to prepare? Take the necessary action to create a fairer world. I see the need for a great reset. So people assume we are just going back to the good old world which we had and everything will be normal again. This is, let's say, fiction. It will not happen. Speaker 1: There is only one way this pandemic is going to go. It's going to get worse and worse and worse. Speaker 0: The next crisis is already waiting for us around the coma, and it is the climate crisis.
BGatesIsaPyscho
Posted - May 14, 2025 at 1:49 PM
Saved - May 16, 2025 at 6:26 AM

@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen

“This study shows that if you took the Flu Vaccine you were 26.9% more likely to contract influenza” Wow - Turns out Flu Vaccines are just another dangerous money making scam for Big Pharma. https://t.co/shkLLA7KPL

Video Transcript AI Summary
A Cleveland Clinic study found the influenza vaccine had a negative efficacy of 26.9% last winter. This means individuals who received the flu vaccine were 26.9% more likely to contract influenza. The report does not specify the pharmaceutical industry's profits from selling this vaccine.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Give you the bottom line on this video so you can decide if you want to watch. Large study at the Cleveland Clinic found out that the flu vaccine, the influenza vaccine over last winter, wasn't that effective. In fact it had a negative efficacy of twenty six point nine percent. In other words, if you took this flu vaccine, you were twenty six point nine percent more likely more likely to get influenza. Unfortunately the paper doesn't give us details on how much money the pharmaceutical industry made from selling this vaccine with negative efficacy.
CultivateElevat
Posted - July 22, 2025 at 5:53 PM
Saved - July 23, 2025 at 3:23 AM

@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate

Can you catch a virus made up by the rockefellers? Nope. Book: the contagion myth, can you catch a cold, and farewell to virology https://t.co/70IXnzLfmG

thehealthb0t
Posted - August 21, 2025 at 7:15 AM
Saved - August 21, 2025 at 12:28 PM

@thehealthb0t - healthbot

Covid-19 was the biggest scam in human history https://t.co/TAQvhQgISZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Coronavirus was isolated in 1965 as one of the first infectious replicatable viral models, associated with the common cold. In 1966, the very first COV coronavirus model was used as a transatlantic biological experiment in human manipulation. In 1967, the first human trials on inoculating people with modified coronavirus were conducted. Between 1975 and 1977, we started modifying coronavirus by putting it into different animals, pigs and dogs. By 1990, Pfizer's first spike protein vaccine patent for coronavirus was filed. From 1990 to 02/2018, every publication on coronavirus vaccines concluded that coronavirus escapes the vaccine impulse because it mutates too quickly. In 02/2002, UNC Chapel Hill patented ‘an infectious replication defective clone of coronavirus’ funded by NIAID's Anthony Fauci from 1999 to 02/2002. That work allegedly preceded SARS-1; SARS is the research developed by humans weaponizing a life system model to attack human beings, patented in 02/2002.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Most of you don't know that coronavirus as a model of a pathogen was isolated in 1965. Coronavirus was identified in 1965 as one of the first infectious replicatable viral models that could be used to modify a series of other experiences of the human condition. It was isolated once upon a time associated with the common cold. But what's particularly interesting about its isolation in 1965 was that it was immediately identified as a pathogen that could be used and modified for a whole host of reasons. And you heard me correctly, that was 1965. And by the way, these slides are public domain. You're welcome to look at every single reference. Every comment that I made is based on published material. So do make sure that you look at those references. But in 1966, the very first COV coronavirus model was used as a transatlantic biological experiment in human manipulation. And you heard the date, 1966. I hope you're getting the point of what I'm saying. This is not an overnight thing. This is actually something that's been long in the making. A year before I was born, we had the first Transatlantic coronavirus data sharing experiment between The United States and The United Kingdom. And in 1967, the year I was born, we did the first human trials on inoculating people with modified coronavirus. Isn't that amazing? Fifty six years ago, the overnight success of a pathogen that's been fifty six years in engineering. And I want that to chill with all of you. Where were we when we actually allowed in violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties? Where were we as a human civilization when we thought it was an acceptable thing to do to take a pathogen for The United States and infect the world with it. Where was that conversation? And what should have been that conversation in 1967? That conversation wasn't had. Ironically, the common cold was turned into a chimera in the nineteen seventies. And in 1975, 1976, and 1977, we started figuring out how to modify coronavirus by putting it into different animals, pigs and dogs. And not surprisingly, by the time we got to 1990, we found out that coronavirus as a infectious agent was an industrial problem for two primary industries, the industries of dogs and pigs. Dog breeders and pigs found that coronavirus created gastrointestinal problems, and that became the basis for Pfizer's first spike protein vaccine patent filed, are you ready for this, in 1990. Did you hear what I just said? 1990, operation warp speed? I'm sorry. Where's the warp and the speed? Pfizer, 1990, the very first spike protein vaccine for coronavirus. Isn't that fascinating? Isn't it fascinating that we were we were told that, well, the spike protein is a new thing. We just found out that that's the problem. No. As a matter of fact, we didn't just find out it was not just now now the problem. We found that out in 1990 and filed the first patents on vaccines in 1990 for the spike protein of coronavirus. And who would have thought? Pfizer. Clearly, the innocent organization that does nothing but promote human health. Clearly Pfizer, the organization that has not bought the votes in this chamber and every chamber of every government around the world. Not that Pfizer. Certainly, they wouldn't have had anything to do with this. But, oh, yes, they did. And in 1990, they found out that there was a problem with vaccines. They didn't work. You know why they didn't work? It turns out that coronavirus is a very malleable model. It transforms and it changes and it mutates over time. As a matter of fact, every publication on vaccines for coronavirus from 1990 until 02/2018, every single publication concluded that coronavirus escapes the vaccine impulse because it modifies and mutates too quickly for vaccines to be effective. And since 1990 to 02/2018, that is the published science, ladies and gentlemen. That's following the science. Following the science is their own indictment of their own programs that said it doesn't work. And there are thousands of publications to that effect, not a few 100 and not paid for by pharmaceutical companies. These are publications that are independent scientific research that shows unequivocally, including efforts of the chimaera modifications made by Ralph Barrack in the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. All of them show vaccines do not work on coronavirus. That's the science, and that science has never been disputed. But then we had an interesting development in 02/2002, and this data is most important. Because in 02/2002, the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill patented, and I quote, an infectious replication defective clone of coronavirus. Listen to those words, infectious replication defective. What does that phrase actually mean? For those of you not familiar with language, let me unpack it for you. Infectious replication defective means a weapon. It means something meant to target an individual, but not have collateral damage to other individuals. That's what infectious replication defective means. And that patent was filed in 2002 on work funded by NIAID's Anthony Fauci from 1999 to 02/2002, and that work patented at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill mysteriously preceded SARS one point o by a year. Dave, are you suggesting that SARS one point o wasn't from a wet market in Wuhan? Are you suggesting it might have come from a laboratory in the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill? No. I'm not suggesting it. I'm telling you that's the facts. We engineered SARS. SARS is not a naturally occurring phenomenon. The naturally occurring phenomenon is called the common cold. It's called influenza like illness. It's called gastroenteritis. That's the naturally occurring coronavirus. SARS is the research developed by humans weaponizing a life system model to actually attack human beings, and they patented it in 02/2002. And in 02/2003,
TheQNewsPatriot
Posted - September 21, 2025 at 12:35 AM
Saved - September 21, 2025 at 2:37 PM

@TheQNewsPatriot - SGAnon

Throwback 2006 report by CBS News exposed NIH knew at the time that “flu shots” were a giant sham, but kept pushing them anyway https://t.co/g3asthWU9S

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Over twenty years, the percentage of seniors getting flu shots increased sharply from fifteen percent to sixty five percent." "But no matter how they crunched the numbers, they got the same disappointing result. Flu shots have not reduced deaths among the elderly." "We realized that we had incendiary materials." "Doctor Reichert says they thought their study would prove vaccinations had helped." "Were you surprised?" "Astonished." "That study soon to be published finds the same poor results in Australia, France, Canada, and The UK." "Decades of promoting flu shots in seniors and the billions spent haven't had the desired result." "The CDC says they should still get their flu shots, that it could make flu less severe or prevent other problems not reflected in the totals." "But watch for the CDC to shift toward protecting the elderly by vaccinating more children and others around them who could pass the flu."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here's what scientists have found. Over twenty years, the percentage of seniors getting flu shots increased sharply from fifteen percent to sixty five percent. It stands to reason that flu deaths among the elderly should have taken a dramatic dip, making an x graph like this. Instead, flu deaths among the elderly continue to climb. It was hard to believe, so researchers at the National Institutes of Health set out to do a study adjusting for all kinds of factors that could be masking the true benefits of the shots. But no matter how they crunched the numbers, they got the same disappointing result. Flu shots have not reduced deaths among the elderly. It's not what health officials hope to find. NIH wouldn't let us interview the study's lead author, So we went to Boston and found the only coauthor not employed by NIH, doctor Tom Reichert. Speaker 1: We realized that we had incendiary materials. Speaker 0: Doctor Reichert says they thought their study would prove vaccinations had helped. Speaker 1: We, we were trying to do something mainstream. That's for sure. Speaker 0: Were you surprised? Speaker 1: Astonished. Speaker 0: Did you check the data a couple of times to make sure? Speaker 1: Well, even more than that. We've looked at other countries now, and the same is true. Speaker 0: That study soon to be published finds the same poor results in Australia, France, Canada, and The UK. And other new research stokes the idea that decades of promoting flu shots in seniors and the billions spent haven't had the desired result. The current head of national immunizations confirmed CDC is now looking at new strategies, but stopped short of calling the present policy a failure. There's an active dialogue into how we can do better to prevent influenza and its complications in the elderly. So what's an older person to do? The CDC says they should still get their flu shots, that it could make flu less severe or prevent other problems not reflected in the total numbers. But watch for CDC to likely shift in the near future more toward protecting the elderly in a roundabout way by vaccinating more children and others around them who could give them the flu. Cheryl Atkinson, CBS News, Washington.
View Full Interactive Feed