reSee.it - Related Post Feed

johncardillo
Posted - June 10, 2022 at 12:09 PM
Saved - October 18, 2023 at 8:25 AM

@johncardillo - John Cardillo

Never forget that it was FBI asset Ray Epps ordering people into the Capitol. The entire thing was a set up from the jump. https://t.co/6zF2ECVFkr

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses their intention to go to the Capitol, despite the potential consequences. They emphasize the need to enter the Capitol building multiple times.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know. In fact, tomorrow, I don't even like to say it because I'll be arrested. Well, let's not say it. We need we need to go I'll say it. We need to go in to the capitol. Let's go. No. I'm gonna put it out there. I'm probably gotta go to jail for a jail tomorrow. We need to go into the capitol. Into the capitol. The capital's
FrontlineFlash
Posted - January 8, 2023 at 10:23 PM
Saved - February 1, 2025 at 4:20 PM

@FrontlineFlash - Frontline⚡️Flash™

Tucker Carlson DISMANTLES the Jan 6 hoax, piece by piece. J6 is not only a grotesque series of lies…it is the most brazen assault by the U.S. government against innocent citizens in modern history. It is pure evil. https://t.co/tyFM0tBnuN

Video Transcript AI Summary
Two years ago, Capitol Police officer Michael Byrd shot unarmed Ashley Babbitt during the January 6th events. Byrd had a history of firearm negligence but faced no consequences for the shooting. Instead, he was celebrated, while Babbitt's mother was arrested for holding a memorial for her daughter. The narrative surrounding January 6th has been manipulated, leading to false claims, such as the deaths of five police officers, which are untrue. Officer Brian Sicknick, initially reported to have died from violence, actually suffered a stroke later. Key events, like the pipe bomb incident and the role of Ray Epps, have been obscured, raising questions about federal agency involvement. Despite evidence of orchestrated actions, Epps faced no charges, highlighting inconsistencies in the official narrative surrounding that day.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: An anniversary. 2 years ago today, a Capitol Hill police officer called Michael Byrd shot an unarmed woman in the neck. At the time of that killing, Byrd had a documented history of gross negligence with a firearm. He left a loaded Glock pistol in a public men's room at the capitol which for a law enforcement official is a firing offense. But for some reason, Michael Bird was still in the force that day. Woman he killed was called Ashley Babbitt. Babbitt was a married 14 year veteran of the US military. She ran a pool cleaning company with her husband in San Diego. Physically, she was tiny. She was also unarmed. Michael Byrd later admitted he had no indication at all that Babbitt was carrying a weapon. She posed no visible threat. He killed her anyway. Under normal circumstances, Byrd would have been fired immediately and charged with murder, which he clearly committed. But that's not what happened. After doing essentially no investigation into the shooting, Nancy Pelosi's congressional police force declared Byrd a national hero and the media strongly agreed. Byrd went on television to accept accolades and to complain about racism. He was never punished for killing Ashley Babbitt. He was rewarded for it. Ashley Babbitt's mother meanwhile got a very different sort of treatment. Babbitt's mother was arrested today in Washington by the Capitol Police. Her crime trying to hold a memorial service for her daughter. 2 years later, it's clear that Ashley Babbitt is her death is by far the most significant thing that happened at the US Capitol building that day. But at the same time, it is the least talked about event of January 6th. Why is that? Well, because the facts about what actually happened on January 6th disrupt the lies. What they told you happened on January 6th. And those lies have proven very useful to the Biden administration and to permanent Washington. On the basis of a wholly created myth about what happened that day, the Biden Pentagon conducted an unprecedented political purge of the entire US military. The FBI and various intel agencies increased their control over the American media. And most obviously, the DOJ has been allowed to prosecute and jail hundreds of nonviolent political protesters whose crime was having the wrong opinions. Lies about January 6 which have been relentless have enabled some of the most unscrupulous people in our country to make a mockery of our bill of rights and to steal our core freedoms. So they can't talk about Ashley Babbitt. Talking about Ashley Babbitt makes it very clear who the real culprits are and who the real threats to this country continue to be. And they're not the January 6th protesters. So instead they lie about what happened that day and they do it in the boldest possible ways without shame and with maximum aggression. Here's Hakeem Jeffries leader of the Democrats in the house telling you that 5 police officers were killed on January 6th when in fact the real total is 0. Speaker 1: We are gathered here to honor their memory and acknowledge with deep gratitude the tremendous bravery of the hundreds of officers who defended us at this citadel of democracy, that faithful day. As a result of the events, on January 6th, the lives of 5 heroic officers were lost. Speaker 0: Five heroic officers were lost. He said, it's almost impossible to believe that adults could stand behind him as he said that because everyone in the picture you just saw knows that is not true. It's not a stilted interpretation of events. It's a flat out lie. No police officers were killed on January 6th period. Ashley Babbitt was killed on January 6th. But chances are your grandchildren will not know that because history will likely record the lie you just heard as true simply because it's been repeated so often everyone in authority has said the same thing in unison for 2 solid years. As our thoroughly dishonest attorney general recently put a quote, we will never forget the 5 officers who responded selflessly on January 6th, who do have and who have since lost their lives. His boss, Joe Biden, repeated that lie today from the White House. Speaker 2: These people and the people representing those who couldn't be here because they gave their lives for this did is incredibly consequential. Because that's not political talk. That's historical fact. Speaker 0: That's historical fact, says Joe Biden as he manufactures history as he tells lies. They've been doing this telling these same lies since the very first day January 6, 2021. Almost like it was a coordinated operation. Remember when they told you that Brian Sicknick, officer Brian Sicknick was beaten to death with a fire extinguisher? Speaker 3: Officer Sicknick died after being hit in the head with a fire extinguisher. Sicknick died after being hit in the head with a fire extinguisher. Officer Brian Sicknick died after being hit in the head with a fire extinguisher during the hours long attack. They beat a capitol police officer to death with a fire extinguisher. Speaker 0: Officer Brian Sicknick died after being hit in the head with a fire extinguisher during the fight. Speaker 2: He died at the age of 42 after he was bludgeoned, the fire extinguisher. Speaker 0: That's not true. And in the end, thanks to the medical examiner in the District of Columbia, we learned the fact, which is that Brian Sicknick died of a stroke well after the January 6th protest. He was not beaten to death with a fire extinguisher, but that did not stop their lying or even slow them down. Joe Biden just awarded one of this country's highest civilian honors the presidential citizens medal to officers working on January 6 and that would include the officers who opened the doors of the capitol building to the so called Insurrectionist the officers who let them inside and then were rewarded for it by the president of the United States. What's going on here? You may wonder well don't ask you're not allowed to know what's going on here nor can you know about the very obvious clandestine role of federal agencies that encouraged the events of January 6th that happened, but its details have never been explained. A lot has still not been explained from that day despite a committee that was impaneled for more than a year. For example, you remember the pipe bomber who planted explosives outside the Democratic National Committee? Well those explosives it turns out were under a bench at the same moment that Kamala Harris who had secret service protection with her who swept the building was there. So how did the US Secret Service miss a bomb sitting in plain sight during its security sweep? Well, we can't answer that because the FBI still to this day refuses to release all the security footage. Why? What's going on here? Almost unique among media outlets, Revolver News asked that question. Speaker 4: The pipe bomber even looks at camera to head on for some reason. It's very frustrating because we can't see the moment the pipe bomber plants the pipe bomb, but the FBI can. That's because the whole scene should be captured on camera 1 as well and much more clearly than camera 2. Camera 1 has a clear shot of both benches. If the FBI released the full tape from camera 1, we could see the pipe bomber planting the bomb. Speaker 0: So somebody planted bombs outside the headquarters of this country's 2 main political parties. That would seem to be a big story and yet no one ever mentions it again, including the FBI. In fact, the bureau won't disclose any information about the suspect. Not his height, weight, shoe size, anything. So if they wanted to catch this person wouldn't they be telling you all they can about who it is? But they're not. Why aren't they? And what was Kamala Harris doing there? Why did she lie about being there? We can answer those questions. We should be able to nor does anyone in authority want to talk about Ray Epps. Ray Epps, of course, is the man who was caught on tape encouraging the crowd outside the Capitol both on January 5th 6th to commit felonies by rushing inside. Now what's interesting is that the January 6th committee under public pressure did in the end interview Ray Epps. Now we don't have all of the committee's records about that interview. We should but we don't but some have been released and what they tell is a remarkable story. In the testimony that we have the committee coaches Ray Epps on how to answer questions about his involvement quote. I was in the front with a few others. I also orchestrated it. I helped get people there. End quote. Now Epps admitted that in a text message to a relative on January 6th. He's admitting crimes. He's never been even charged for those crimes. But what's so fascinating is it when those facts came up in his interview with the committee, someone on the committee responds this way and we're quoting. I just want to understand a little more your use of the word orchestrated. It sounds to me like at this point when you sent this text you had turned away in part because of seeing some things you didn't agree with is that right? Like when you sent this you are already on your way from the capitol because it concerns of people taking it in a different direction. Is that the most leading question ever asked in the history of a congressional hearing? Probably. And the whole interview goes on like this. Keep in mind, Raheb's is one of the only people caught on camera that day encouraging others to break the law. He's one of the only ones. And then he's never been charged. Speaker 2: And Speaker 0: the January 6th committee was
HansMahncke
Posted - March 9, 2023 at 1:44 AM
Saved - February 7, 2024 at 7:02 PM

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

This is from June 21, 2021. Putin was more honest about the J6 protesters than the entire US media establishment. https://t.co/hTVaKbIfdF

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker denies ordering the assassination of Alexei Navalny and argues that their country does not have a habit of assassinating people. They also question whether the arrest and detention of 450 individuals who entered the congress with political demands is a form of persecution for their political opinions.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ask you may I just ask you a direct question? Did you order Alexei Navalny's assassination? Of course not. We don't have this kind of habit of assassinating anybody. That's 1. Number 2 is I want to ask you, did you order the Assassination of the woman who walked into the congress and who was shot and killed by a policeman. Do you know that 400 And 50 individuals were arrested after entering the congress, and they didn't go there to steal a laptop. They came with political demands. 450 people have been detained. You're talking about a capital They're looking at jail time Between 15 25 years, and they came to the congress with political demands. Isn't that persecution for political opinions?
WallStreetApes
Posted - August 13, 2023 at 3:15 PM
Saved - August 13, 2023 at 11:05 PM

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Remember an outraged media playing this clip of the Jan 6th insurrection? No? That’s b/c it was Antifa & BLM storming the White House & injuring 50+ Secret Service agents No indictments. No outrage or ‘worst day in our nations history’. Shortly after they burned down a church,

Video Transcript AI Summary
Protesters have managed to overpower the police at times, tearing down parts of the barricade and hurling objects at them. The police respond by reinforcing the barricade, leading to confrontations with the protesters. This ongoing struggle has created a highly intense and volatile situation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The time the scene, but the protesters have gotten the upper hand a couple of times. They've been able to rip away parts of the barricade and kinda pull them away and just toss them. And then the police will go and bring another part of it and try to reinforce. And when they do that, the protesters confront them, they throw things at them, and the police try to hold their ground. It is today's very intense push and pull for, I'd say, at least
TiffMoodNukes
Posted - November 17, 2023 at 9:38 PM
Saved - November 18, 2023 at 5:05 PM

@TiffMoodNukes - It's 🇺🇸 Tiff 🇺🇸

There was no “insurrection”. Now release the prisoners https://t.co/JbpmkTnYRP

Timcast
Posted - November 17, 2023 at 11:25 PM
Saved - November 19, 2023 at 1:22 PM

@Timcast - Tim Pool

The police facilitated January 6th This is why they withheld the tapes The J6 committee should be censured and expelled for lying to the public https://t.co/nO9tbNP4lH

carsonkrow
Posted - November 17, 2023 at 11:58 PM
Saved - November 21, 2023 at 4:17 PM

@carsonkrow - 🇺🇸 Carson Krow 🇺🇸

J6 was a fraud upon We the People

@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson

Capitol Police were giving handshakes to protesters. Now ask yourselves this; In which “insurrection” or “Rebellion” in history would this have happened in? None — because this is not an “insurrection “ https://t.co/pifgLXpKJa

meantweeting1
Posted - November 18, 2023 at 3:33 AM
Saved - November 19, 2023 at 6:04 AM

@meantweeting1 - Epstein's Sheet. 🧻

The J6 Insurrection was one big SET UP. These Metropolitan police officers knew it that day. It's time to release ALL the J6 prisoners and start arresting the architects of this day, Nancy Pelosi would be a great start. https://t.co/kjG4SoEFiU

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 accuses someone of setting them up, repeating it twice. They claim that they were asked to come two hours later and were set up. They express frustration and mention not feeling well. The transcript abruptly ends.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They set us the fuck up. That's what they did. They set us they set up 64. Oh, absolutely. They set up they set up 64. Oh, absolutely. And then they asked y'all to come. 2 hours later. They set us up. They needed everybody right away. No. Right away. They set us the fuck up. Oh, man. We ain't got sick. We're doing this right here with some nigga. We ain't got no
GuntherEagleman
Posted - November 18, 2023 at 8:40 PM
Saved - November 19, 2023 at 1:16 PM

@GuntherEagleman - Gunther Eagleman™

This was not an insurrection… 👇🏼 https://t.co/GxV5z3N6yP

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses frustration and anger towards the lack of action taken to protect the capital building. They question why backup has not been called and criticize those in charge for allowing the destruction to occur. The speaker urges for immediate assistance and suggests that if backup is not provided, it indicates a lack of concern.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you letting this happen? Why haven't you called for backup? Where is your backup? This is our damn capital building, and you all are letting it get destroyed on your watch. Fuck all of you. Call for backup. Get some help down here. And and if they don't wanna give you fucking backup, they obviously don't give a shit about
GuntherEagleman
Posted - November 26, 2023 at 8:36 PM
Saved - November 26, 2023 at 10:39 PM

@GuntherEagleman - Gunther Eagleman™

More proof January 6th was a setup. https://t.co/NYv9OsDCjO

McBrideLawNYC
Posted - November 28, 2023 at 3:55 PM
Saved - November 28, 2023 at 7:51 PM

@McBrideLawNYC - Joseph D. McBride, Esq.

EVERYTHING WE SAID ABOUT J6 IS TRUE. (Screaming & Shoving ≠ Insurrection) https://t.co/XXKii1Cpes

kylenabecker
Posted - November 30, 2023 at 2:08 PM
Saved - December 1, 2023 at 5:26 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The January 6th incident involved over 200 undercover operatives and Feds, according to Rep. Clay Higgins. Evidence suggests FBI agents infiltrated the crowd dressed as Trump supporters. The FBI's involvement extended beyond that day, with messages leading back to their agents. The event appears to have been a setup, planned months in advance. Despite warnings, law enforcement was unprepared. Claims of a coordinated plot to overturn the election are baseless. This narrative has led to a partisan trial, interfering with the election process. January 6th was a manufactured riot to frame the president and interfere in future elections. Case closed.

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

So, it turns out there were "at least 200" Feds and undercover operatives working the Trump entrapment plot on January 6. That's according to U.S. Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA), who sat down for a recent interview on the matter. “The FBI was not just participating in the January 6th acts from within. I suspect they had over 200 agents embedded in the crowd, including agents or, as they would call it, human assets inside the Capitol dressed as Trump supporters before the doors were opened.” This figure is in the realm of possibility, given the newly released J6 videos, court documents, and witness statements. “And when you track the text threads and the communications within those groups and find the origins of suggestions of potential violence or an active occupation of the Capitol on January 6th, you’ll find that those messages were led by members of the groups that ended up to be the FBI agents that had infiltrated the group,” Higgins said. “So the FBI’s involvement was deep, not just on J6, but on the days and weeks and months prior.” There is now zero doubt that J6 was a set-up. The Trump "incitement" narrative had been hatched months prior, as the infamous Time "shadow cabal" article made clear. The J6 riot was war-gamed multiple times before the Electoral College. The FBI unconstitutionally used NSA surveillance to track the extremist groups seeking to disrupt the event. It had Federal informants embedded in multiple extremist groups, including the Proud Boys. Yet, somehow, the FBI and Capitol Police were woefully "unprepared" despite multiple advance warnings, including from then Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund. D.C. Mayor Bowser, former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, former Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, and others, refused to press for more National Guard, despite it being documented and on the record that former President Donald Trump wanted 10,000 National Guard troops outside Congress to protect the Electoral College. Also, there was no 'centrally coordinated' plot to overturn the results of the 2020 election, as FBI sources told Reuters in an August 2021 report. Indeed, that was the entire point of the election challenges during the convening of the Electoral College. If Donald Trump wanted to overturn the 2020 election results, he would not have disrupted the Electoral College. He would have continued to pursue his legal challenges and his Constitutional right to challenge electoral slates in Congress. Trump would not have sent in unarmed extremists to disrupt the Electoral College in order to 'retain power.' This is not only illogical, it is absurd on its face. Nonetheless, this ridiculous partisan narrative has constituted the basis for prosecuting a former president in what has devolved into a partisan show trial and tantamount to election interference. It is not only ironic, but a disgrace to our entire justice system. January 6 was a Fed-manufactured riot to frame a sitting president and carry out election interference in 2024. Case closed.

Jim11P
Posted - December 1, 2023 at 9:21 PM
Saved - December 14, 2023 at 11:27 PM

@Jim11P - RemovedJim11B2P

Only actions speak louder.

@JoshWhoX - JoshWho #SeekingTheTruth

🚨REVEALED🚨 Shocking : This is really all what happened Jan 6th. This was a total setup, inside job Nancy Pelosi orchestrated. What Nancy and these capitol police did was the real insurrection. Made it a giant psyop framing the Trump supporters. You can't deny this anymore. https://t.co/MMEl0JpWao

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video features various speakers discussing the events of January 6th. They mention the presence of unidentified individuals with guns and the need for more munitions. One speaker regrets their initial assumption about a person causing problems. They also discuss the claim of a deadly insurrection and the controversy surrounding the death of Officer Brian Sicknick. Surveillance footage is mentioned, which supposedly contradicts the narrative that Sicknick was killed by the mob. The speakers express frustration with the lies and deception surrounding the events and apologize for their own dishonesty.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You're the black vest. Big blue line. Big on. My dark hair, and he's found I've been looking looking 27 or something on his hip. No police identification. Couldn't get to him because there were so many people What, like, the grayish black maybe maybe guys have any identifiers? Like, this is have a wristband, their guns will have a hand strike on the barrel. Okay. I don't know the wristband color, but they'll have a wristband somewhere. Okay? You guys, good. Hey. Good shit. Sorry. Good shit. All tight. All fucking tight. We're getting rid Hey. Welcome to the front of this fucking line. Come here. Hey. We need more fucking munitions. Hey. We need blasting this. What do we got? I don't have it. Goddamn. We gotta get something. Rich. Rich has a 40. Rich, over here. 40. Hey, Rich. Yeah. Put it up in the fucking scaffolding. Alright. Hey. I'll make sure No. No. Yes. Gonna go with that. Hey. What are you doing? I got him. I got him. If they'd never thrown the concussion grenades. If they've never used a pepper spray, this wouldn't have happened. It was a peaceful protest. I was wrong. I thought that guy was causing problems, but he's not. We're gonna have to get a real That'll be fine if you can help. It's pushed there. Nothing And and not only that, we're taking out 1 and 10 of them are getting way here. It's it's it's we're multiplying them by hitting them. Wait. Read this. Hold on. Hold on. I'm gonna read this. Read this. Read this. Read this. This is read it. Donald Trump, is it? Donald Trump, Colt. I am asking for everyone in the US government to remain peaceful. No violence. Remember, dear, we are Party of law and order, respect our law enforcement, men and women in blue. No. No. No. Pull up the video. And that's what this is all about. It's a great Service said they had dissuaded him for coming to Canada though. They told him they don't have the resources to protect him here. So at the moment, he is not coming, but that could check check. If he comes, I'm gonna punch him out. I know. I would pay I see. We're waiting for this, for trespassing on the capital grounds. I wanna punch him out. I'm gonna go to jail, and I'm gonna be happy. I'm I'm just picking up drugs. Do not go in there. Speaker 1: Within hours of January 6th literally hours you began to hear that day described as a deadly in Surrection not described by 1 news outlet or 1 politician but in unison by all of them almost like it was coordinated a deadly insurrection. That's how history may record January 6th. But the tape that we reviewed from within the building on that day proves It was neither an insurrection nor deadly. Here it is. Speaker 0: January 6th, when an estimated 2,000 rioters breached the capitol building causing the deaths of 5 police officers. Speaker 2: Certain dates echo throughout history. December 7, 1941, September 11, 2001 and January 6th, the mob beat officers with Anything they had on them, hockey stick, flagpole, a fire extinguisher, police officers died. Speaker 0: Donald Trump supporters who, of course, Rioted and killed police officers. Speaker 1: By the evening of January 6th, the Democratic Party and its publicist in the national news media had settled on a description of what had happened that day They distilled an enormous number of highly complex events, events that even now we don't fully understand, Into a single emotionally elated political slogan, which they've repeated for years with remarkable discipline. January 6th, They said was a deadly insurrection. Speaker 0: There was a deadly insurrection that the right wing is trying to cover up. He incited a deadly insurrection. Incited a deadly insurrection. Speaker 3: The violent, deadly insurrection on the Capitol 9 months ago, it was about white supremacy in my opinion. Speaker 1: A deadly insurrection. Everything about That phrase is a lie very little about January 6 was organized or violent surveillance video from inside the capital shows mostly peaceful chaos But the slogan worked. The term deadly carries enormous emotional power, which is why they used it. To prove the insurrection was deadly, propagandists pointed to the death of an officer called Brian Cichnik. The mob killed officer Brian Cichnik. That's what they said. It was their single most powerful indictment of the January 6th protesters and of Donald Trump and of Republican voters nationally. They repeated that claim for years. They are still repeating it. At first, they told the country that officer Cichnik was murdered with a fire extinguisher. Speaker 0: Officer Brian Sicknick died after being hit in the head with a fire extinguisher during the fight. Speaker 1: That story came from the New York Times which is Effectively the assignment editor for most of the rest of American media it was a lie untrue in any way But only after that lie had hardened into conventional wisdom did the newspaper bother to retract it. Speaker 0: The New York Times has Quietly retracted its story about the death of Capitol police officer Brian Sicknick. Speaker 1: The damage had been done. Brian Sicknick himself a Trump voter had been transformed without his consent into a political martyr of the left His memory was shamelessly exploited by the incoming Biden administration. In February of 2021, Cygni's body He lay in state in the Capitol rotunda where a parade of unscrupulous politicians made use of it. Here's Joe Biden. Speaker 4: Breaking down the doors, Trying to overturn an outcome of election and killing several police officers in the meantime. Speaker 1: But Brian Cycnik should not be reduced to a prop for the political ambitions of the Democratic Party. He was a human being. The facts of his life matter, including how he died. To this day, media accounts describe Sicknick is someone who was, quote, slain on January 6th. The video we reviewed proves that is a lie. Here is surveillance footage of Sicknick walking in the capital after he was supposedly murdered by the mob outside By all appearances Sicknick is healthy and vigorous He's wearing a helmet, so it's hard to imagine he was killed by a head injury. Whatever happened to Brian Sicknick was very obviously not The result of violence he suffered at the entrance to the Capitol. This tape overturns the single most powerful and politically useful lie the Democrats have told us about January 6th and it was indeed a lie the January 6th committee knew perfectly well that Brian Sicknick was walking normally through the capital After he was supposedly murdered by Trump supporters, and they know that because they saw this tape. We can be sure because the footage contains an electronic bookmark that is still archived in the capital's computer system That means that investigators working The Democratic Party reviewed this tape. They saw it, but they refused to release the tape to the public. Why because this tape would shatter the fraud they were perpetrating on the country because hiding the truth served their political They lied about the police officer they claimed to revere. If they were willing to do that, then their dishonesty knew no limits. Speaker 0: Now we're just we won't have to live a life of secrets. For I knew that even though some of you supported us, some others were looking at me and thinking, you're a liar. You're a liar. You know something that you're not telling us you slimy scumbag liar. You know that's what people would say to me And then people would see my wife in the supermarket and they would say hello, but they'd be thinking, there goes that murderer. You got away with murder you murdering, lying waste of life. And to me people might say things like, Liar! Tell us what you know, you goddamn liar. And so to both of us, people all over town would be saying things like, You know goddamn well what hap so stop acting like victims and confess you murdering murderers. Confess liar. Confess. You know, and that's what people would be saying to us. And so We just had to come forward and tell the truth. We're sorry we lied to you all. It won't happen again.
VivekGRamaswamy
Posted - December 5, 2023 at 4:12 PM
Saved - December 5, 2023 at 8:00 PM

@VivekGRamaswamy - Vivek Ramaswamy

TRUTH #1: January 6 now looks more & more like entrapment. https://t.co/XoqwdXPEBz

Video Transcript AI Summary
Protesters stormed Capitol Hill, with police officers removing barricades to let them inside. Some officers seemed welcoming, while others allowed individuals like the "horns guy" into the Senate. The purpose of the protest remains unclear. Contrary to the narrative, footage shows protesters peacefully walking through the Capitol, taking tours, and posing for selfies. They appeared respectful of the building. However, there were also instances of police officers preparing to use force and requesting more munitions. The events of January 6th were a mix of peaceful demonstrations and tense confrontations. (98 words)
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Protesters onto the steps of Capitol Hill. Have you seen this? No one has explained what this was all about, and this happened all over Capitol Hill that day. You'll see in another portion here, these barricades being removed by police officers so these people can get inside the capitol building. And then there were others, Capitol Hill police officers, just standing by, just welcome to the capital. What was all of this about? What was all of this about? Also, and you've seen this by now, the horns guy and others like him just allowed into the senate. Speaker 1: The police here are willing to Speaker 2: work with us and cooperate peacefully. Speaker 1: It's like our parade peacefully like our 1st amendment allowed. Gather for Americans under the condition that they will come and gather peacefully to discuss what needs to be done To save our country. Speaker 0: You have a memory of anything near like this? We No. We just saw protesters walking through Satouerie Hall, Clare, I don't want to interrupt but we just saw people right going right through there they are. Speaker 2: They were Speaker 0: peaceful. They were orderly and meek. These were not insurrectionists they were sightseers footage from inside the capitol overturns the story you've heard about January 6th Protesters queue up in neat little lines. They give each other tours outside the speaker's office. They take cheerful selfies and they smile. They're not destroying the capital. They obviously revere the capital. Speaker 2: They're I have given warnings about chemical munition. I need to let the lethal team Position above me to start deploying. Launch. Launch. Launch. Speaker 1: You're on the wrong side, Anthony. Speaker 2: We need more fucking munitions. Let's go. Fucking shoot it. Go.
meantweeting1
Posted - December 19, 2023 at 10:34 PM
Saved - December 20, 2023 at 12:48 PM

@meantweeting1 - Epstein's Sheet. 🧻

The January 6th Insurrection hoax is unraveling in real time. https://t.co/VztpRdbGMw

Video Transcript AI Summary
Nancy Pelosi's daughter and her friends admit that there was no real insurrection on January 6th. The media's biased narrative and the January 6th Committee's unfair actions poisoned the jury pool in Washington DC. The defendants' rights were violated through the use of invasive surveillance techniques and the trapping of protesters. The Justice Department also failed to respect the protesters' First Amendment rights.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We now have on tape Nancy Pelosi's documentarian daughter, and her friends admitting that no real insurrection ever occurred. The collective effect of the January 6th Committee shameful way of proceeding, plus the reinforcing media blitz, poisoned the jury pool in Washington DC. Trial venue transfers out of DC should have been permitted. Media narrative mongering, indeed was also The pre original sin, therefore, of this entire issue because it laid the groundwork for the January 6th Select Committee's hatchet jobs. 3rd, many of the defendants were swept up in a vast dragnet that I believe violated the 4th Amendment because it was the equivalent of a general warrant that our framers sought to ban. This was done through the use of Geo fencing technology and cell phone data warrants sent to telecom providers. Additionally, many protesters arriving after President Trump's speech, in the ellipse had finished, did not see any signage that areas normally open to the public were closed that day, setting up a trespass trap for the unwary. Fourth, the Justice Department did not treat these cases with appropriate respect for the First Amendment rights of the protesters. The 2020 presidential
AmericanHubener
Posted - December 26, 2023 at 11:35 AM
Saved - December 28, 2023 at 12:36 PM

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

Insurrection my ass! When stealing elections isn’t insurrection but challenging stolen elections is, you know Media has gone full on Funny Farm George Orwell. 🤡 Schumer originally claimed that Trump committed erection fraud on J6! 😂 https://t.co/02J2vQmvXg

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions the legitimacy of the claim that Trump is an insurrectionist, stating that for this to be true, one must believe that the events of January 6th constituted a genuine attempt at taking over the government. They highlight that historically, there has never been an armed insurrection. The speaker mentions the presence of individuals like the man in a buffalo costume and suggests that the Capitol Police were the ones armed on that day. They imply that there may have been deep state intervention and note that Joe Biden considers Trump to be an insurrectionist.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On the legitimacy of the claim that Trump is an insurrectionist. For that to be true, you have to believe that January 6th was an insurrection, a genuine attempt at taking over government. Now remember that there has never been an armed insurrection in history. In history, no one's ever gone, we're taking over this country. Oh, how are you gonna do that? Oh, bloody well. By being persuasive. Have you not seen these hats? We've got 1 guy with makeup on and a buffalo costume. Now step aside, sir. Like the Capitol Police were the ones that were armed. Right? And certainly they've got a lot more funding since that day and I'm sure that that's wasn't the sole agenda at play, certainly, it seems more and more that there was deep state intervention, involved on that day and that event. Joe Biden, though, he thinks that Trump is an insurrectionist.
battleofever
Posted - January 6, 2024 at 1:39 PM
Saved - November 12, 2025 at 1:57 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see a thread arguing Jan 6 was a setup by elites to derail Trump, citing claimed insider texts, undercover agents, staged protests, and pre-made statements. It alleges GOP/Dem collusion, political prisoners, misinformation, and calls for releasing full tapes. The posts frame the event as a coordinated coup and demand accountability for those responsible.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@rayeppswasafed - Truly American

Does anyone else remember when Michael Stenger (Senate Master at Arms on J6), basically said there were "Professional Agitators" there? He was found dead after this statement and prior to his in person testimony with J6 committee, but I'm sure that's just a coincidence 🤔

Video Transcript AI Summary
There's an opportunity to learn lessons from the events of January 6. Investigation should be considered as to the funding and travel and what appears to be professional agitated. Investigation should be considered as to the funding and travel and what appears to be professional agitators.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's an opportunity to learn lessons from the events of January 6. Investigation should be considered as to the funding and travel and what appears to be professional agitated. Investigation should be considered as to the funding and travel and what appears to be professional agitators.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@Runningtowardh1 - Runningtowardhappiness

Note that Michael Senger, in charge of security on J6, talked about "professional agitators" in a prepared statement before he mysteriously died. J6 was meant to derail what T was trying to do, to persuade lawmakers with overwhelming support of patriots. #2000Mules #PeoplePower

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@RealTina40 - Tina40

This is DC by Freedom Plaza ... they say it’s for construction work but it’s left out over night ! 🤔🤔 be aware patriots.. watch your 6

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP AOC wasn't smart enough to realize what she'd exposed.

@AOC - Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Rep. Loudermilk released this statement yesterday: “I never gave a tour of the Capitol on Jan 5, 2021.” This morning, this footage was released. Dated January 5th, 2021.

@RepLoudermilk - Rep. Barry Loudermilk

🚨BREAKING🚨: The truth will always prevail. As I’ve said since the Jan. 6 Committee made their baseless accusation about me to the media, I never gave a tour of the Capitol on Jan 5, 2021…

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP Oopsie.

@BoLoudon - Bo Loudon

On January 6, 2021, NPR accidentally released an article at 9:33 AM about Trump supporters clashing with police... HOURS before anything like this ever occurred. Set up.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@laralogan - Lara Logan

It is so obvious what is going on here - the Republicans want to get rid of Trump but they don’t want their fingerprints on it so the Dems are doing it for them. They all know if Trump gets on the ballot it’s over. Same with the impeachment of Biden - the Dems want to get rid of him but they don’t want any of the blame so the Republicans are doing that for them. This is the elite establishment in action. They hate “wethepeople” & have no intention of allowing the constitution or the Republic to survive in anything but name only. Would not be surprised if more Dem controlled states follow suit - then the Republicans can say Trump cannot be the nominee because he can’t win if he is off the ballot in these states. Not their fault of course….Trump’s fault as usual!

@GrahamAllen_1 - Graham Allen

THE PEOPLE ARE WITH DONALD J. TRUMP. His removal from the Colorado primary ballot is an ATTACK on our democracy.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that political opponents are acting with extreme desperation and pursuing aggressive measures to win the election. Specifically, the speaker states that “crooked Joe Biden and the far left lunatics are desperate to stop us by any means necessary,” implying a willingness to employ drastic, even illicit, tactics to achieve victory. The claim continues that these opponents “are willing to violate The US Constitutions at levels never seen before in order to win this election,” portraying a view that constitutional and legal norms are being broken in pursuit of electoral success. Further, the speaker characterizes Joe Biden as a direct danger to the democratic system, declaring that “Joe Biden is a threat to democracy.” The repetition emphasizes the perceived severity of the threat, with the speaker reiterating that “It’s a threat,” underscoring the seriousness attributed to Biden’s impact on democratic processes. Another central claim concerns the alleged use of state power to influence the election. The speaker contends that “they’re weaponizing law enforcement for high level election interference,” suggesting that law enforcement agencies are being directed or used in ways that would undermine fair electoral processes. This accusation is tied to the assertion of electoral advantage, as the speaker claims that such actions are taking place “because we’re beating them so badly in the polls,” attributing the alleged use of force or influence to the current advantage in polling. Overall, the speaker outlines a narrative in which political adversaries are depicted as acting with unprecedented aggression toward securing electoral outcomes, including constitutional violations and the deployment of law enforcement in ways that would interfere with the election. The emphasis is on a perceived threat to democracy and on the strategic use of governmental power as a tool in contested political competition, framed by the assertion of a significant polling lead that allegedly prompts these aggressive tactics.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's no wonder crooked Joe Biden and the far left lunatics are desperate to stop us by any means necessary. Are willing to violate The US Constitutions at levels never seen before in order to win this election. Joe Biden is a threat to democracy. It's a threat. They're weaponizing law enforcement for high level election interference because we're beating them so badly in the polls.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@Sheckyi - Andrew C ™️

👂🏻👂🏻👂🏻👂🏻👂🏻👂🏻👂🏻👂🏻👂🏻 ARE YOU LISTENING?? Former Capitol Police Chief testifies Pelosi lied about her communication with him & made him the scapegoat for J6.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker Pelosi claimed on national television that she had not spoken to the individual since the initial breach of the Capitol and that there had been no communications with him that evening. The individual, referred to as Speaker 1, confirmed that he spoke to Speaker Pelosi three times that evening, contradicting her statement. First call (approximately 05:34 PM): The individual went to brief Vice President Pence at a secure location and to conduct a personal assessment of the Capitol, with House Sergeant at Arms Irving informed that he was going over to brief the Vice President. Irving wanted to get Speaker Pelosi on the phone. The first call to Speaker Pelosi occurred during this briefing, establishing direct contact while the briefing was underway. Second call (during departure from the initial location): As the individual left the area and was walking toward the Senate with Mr. Stenger, Jennifer Hemingway handed him Emily Barrett’s cell phone, and it was Speaker Pelosi on the line. This second call concerned the information provided to Vice President Pence about when the Capitol could be returned to the chambers, and the individual reassured Pelosi that the information was correct and that they could get back into the chambers by 7:00 PM. The call ended after this confirmation. Third call (06:25 PM): While at the Senate, away from the initial secure location, using Robert Karam’s cell phone, the individual dialed leadership who were off-site at a secure location to brief them. He briefed all of the leadership on the plans to get them back into the chambers, which constituted the third call with Speaker Pelosi. In summary, Speaker 1 asserts that there were three separate conversations with Speaker Pelosi on January 7, each addressing the situation and the plan to restore operations in the chambers, including confirmation of the timeline to return by 7:00 PM. He states that Pelosi’s claim of not speaking with him is inaccurate, affirming that he did indeed have three conversations with her that evening.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A second set here. In a press conference on January 7, speaker Pelosi called for your resignation on national television. Speaker Pelosi also stated that she had not talked to you since the initial breach of the Capitol. But according to your transcribed interview, you were on the phone with Speaker Pelosi a few times. Can you explain that discrepancy? Speaker 1: Yeah. That is correct. I spoke to Speaker Pelosi three times that that evening, and she went on national TV and said I'd never spoken to her, but I spoke to her three times. The three three times were the first time when I went over to brief president vice president Pence at the secure location, I had called house sergeant Arms Irving, told him I was going over to brief the vice president. Was also going over to do a personal assessment of the capital. At that point, things were getting under control. Went over there, briefed him on when we can get them back into chambers with, you know, mister Irving being fully aware. He said he wanted to get speaker Pelosi on the phone. He made a phone call from his cell phone at approximately 05:34, where I first briefed speaker Pelosi. The second call was when I left that location. As I was walking away, I met up with mister Stenger, and we started walking over to the senate to go brief the senate when, Jennifer Hemingway, believe it was Jennifer Hemingway, handed me the cell phone, and it was Emily Barrett's cell phone calling her, and it was speaker Pelosi on the other line. This is my call second call with speaker Pelosi questioning the information I'd given to Vice President Pence about when we can get back into chambers. I assured her that information was correct. I could get them back into chambers by seven seven p. M, and the call ended. That was call number two. Call number three was 06:25 p. M. I was over at the senate from the secure location I mean, from where the senate had been sequestered. And on a cell phone using Robert Karam's cell phone, they dialed leadership, who was over off-site at a secure location, and I briefed all of the leadership of the plans to get them back into chambers. That would have call number three with speaker Pelosi. Speaker 0: So you didn't have one call, you didn't have two calls, you had three calls. So speaker Pelosi's comments that she didn't speak to you are inaccurate. Speaker 1: That is correct, sir.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@B_Smallberries - Biff Smallberries

Many have missed what really happened on J6 - swept up in the 'action' staged outside by the 'protestors.' The entire thing was staged to allow RINOs (and anyone else interested) the occasion to abdicate their duties and bypass their obligation to contest the clearly stolen election. Lauffler, Cruz, , Hawley, Paul, and more had sworn they would help Trump and contest - and they are ALL frauds. They KNEW in advance of the Feds plan to stage J6 - as this was what it was all for - to give them the opportunity 'to walk away.' We KNOW for a fact that several Congress people exposed that they ALL knew of the event prior - as a few were busted sending out J6 'response statements' which were posted TO the internet - some to Twitter - PRIOR TO the event even taking place. Not one of these people came back afterward - or even later - and said, 'Hey, we were in the middle of an official, Constitutional proceeding. It was interrupted, but I wasn't finished contesting.' The reason they DIDN'T ever say that?? Because they never really wanted to back Trump in the first place. They LIED. They knew of the plan prior, and they walked away. ALL part of the COUP.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@B_Smallberries - Biff Smallberries

🇺🇸 J6 FLASHBACK On Jan 05, 2021, Chuck Grassley announced that Pence would not be attending the election certification on 1/06/21 and that he (Grassley) would preside. A very ODD statement and Grassley has never FULLY answered for it. 👉🏼 COUP https://www.businessinsider.com/grassley-prompts-confusion-over-pence-electoral-college-certification-2021-1

GOP Sen. Chuck Grassley briefly confuses everyone over announcement on Pence and Electoral College certification GOP Sen. Chuck Grassley suggested that Vice President Mike Pence would skip the Electoral College certification before backtracking. businessinsider.com

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Since Mike Pence is making J6 the centerpiece of his campaign, I thought I would compare his book to the J6 committee testimony of his 2 top aides. And guess what? They don't jive. Pence said Marc Short and Greg Jacob showed up 2 hours later than they actually did. Pence made it sound like he singlehandedly wrote his statement rejecting the "Eastman Plan" when he didn't. He said he forgot to save the document on his desktop computer so his daughter had to rewrite a printed version for him. (Short and Jacob never mention this) He also omitted a 9:15 a.m. call from Trump that morning, when he apparently didn't tell the president he was working on a public statement for release. Then he said he traveled to the Capitol with his family--but Marc Short said they were in a different vehicle. Weird. https://www.declassified.live/p/mike-pences-rewriting-of-his-january

Mike Pence's Rewriting of His January 6 Heroism As he makes his actions on January 6 the centerpiece of his campaign, Pence appears to have a different recollection than those of his top aides. declassified.live

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

@StevieW64261083 @GenFlynn @realDonaldTrump Renew your mind. Here's a starter pkg. #J6 #January6th #politicalprisoners

@ChuckCallesto - Chuck Callesto

FLASHBACK: Video never seen or used by J6 COMMITTEE re-emerges of Jacob Chansley reading Trump’s tweet, telling protestors to GO HOME and remain peaceful.. CORPORATE MEDIA DEAD SILENT..

@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸

Easiest way to tell that FOIA claims of Nancy Pelosi was on the phone at least a dozen times with Ray Epps on J6 is true, is when the media disputes it 💯%

@DesireeAmerica4 - Desiree

Everything about J6 was a hoax, check out the onion in her towel right at the beginning. 🙄

Video Transcript AI Summary
In a brief, on-the-scene exchange, Speaker 0 asks a woman what happened to her. Speaker 1 responds that she was maced. The conversation reveals that she was attempting to go inside a cafe when the incident occurred: she had made it “like a foot inside,” then was pushed out, and they maced her. Speaker 0 continues by asking for her name and where she is from. In reply, Speaker 1 identifies herself as Elizabeth and states that she is from Knoxville, Tennessee. When asked why she wanted to go inside, Speaker 0 frames the moment by noting the surrounding activity, “We’re storming the Capitol. It’s a revolution. Thank you.” Elizabeth’s answer to the question about her motive is explicit: she says that she and others are involved in actions described as storming the Capitol, and she characterizes the situation as part of a revolution.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ma'am, what what happened to you? Speaker 1: I got maced. Speaker 0: You got maced. My my place. And what happened? You were trying to go inside the cafe? I made it like a foot inside, Speaker 1: and they pushed me out, and they maced me. Speaker 0: What's your what's your name? Where are from? Speaker 1: My name is Elizabeth. I'm from Knoxville, Tennessee. Speaker 0: And why did you wanna go in? We're storming the Capitol. It's a revolution. Thank you.

@PizzaPepe - Pizza Pepe 🇺🇸

Another unreleased video from J6. Capitol Police cuff a protestor, then bring him to a side room where they uncuffed him, and fist bumped him.

@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸

Notice how the FBI removed barricades, which the DOJ now says were a magic Secret Service perimeter that more than a thousand Americans have been criminally charged with crossing.

@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸

At 2:30 p.m. - more than an hour and a half after Ray Epps ran through at the Peace Circle - FBI Swat (supposedly stationed and ready just minutes away) finally pulled into the Capitol.

@Bubblebathgirl - Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

Just released video shows FBI removing barricades on J6. Over 1,000 protestors were charged with knocking down and crossing this perimeter even though Feds had removed it. J6 was a lie just like everything else the Democrats do. Free the defendants.

@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)

ICYMI: Jack Smith Is Trying to Block J6 Evidence that Proves Pelosi Rejected Troops Offered by President Trump Watch @jsolomonReports full interview with President Trump on #JustTheNewsNoNoise here: https://rumble.com/v43o9fw-just-the-news-exlusive-interview-with-president-trump.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 argues that Jack Smith’s request to prevent evidence about security or intelligence failures before January 6 is unacceptable, claiming it would excuse Nancy Pelosi and the mayor of DC for failures. He asserts Pelosi was responsible for January 6 because she did not accept the security help offered, stating that 10,000 troops or National Guard were available if needed before the event, and that the event would have been different if 500 or 200 people had been used; he emphasizes that he offered 10,000 troops and that January 6 would not have happened with a larger deployment. He notes that he personally attended and gave a speech, and claims the audience included the largest number he has spoken to, contrasting with the smaller group that he says went down to the Capitol. Speaker 1 contends that the party should be allowed to introduce evidence showing that there were security and intelligence shortcomings, including the assertion that Pelosi “did not take the security that we offered her,” with the offer of 10,000 troops and the fact that “you had far fewer people than that.” He mentions that the unselect committee did not discuss or include references to “peacefully and patriotically” behaving crowds and says this group was not highlighted by the committee or in their words. He criticizes the prosecutor, calling Jack Smith a “deranged human being, unattractive both inside and out,” and accuses Smith of wanting to suppress testimony because the committee “illegally destroyed everything” and deleted evidence related to Pelosi’s decisions about troop deployment. He asserts that much evidence indicated Pelosi did not want the troops and that a letter from the mayor contradicted Pelosi’s stance. Speaker 0 acknowledges the point but keeps the dialogue focused; Speaker 0 reminds that Capitol Police Chief Steve Sun said January 6 was a preventable event if the intelligence and resources requested had been provided, noting that Speaker 0 sees this as an amazing point and confirms that the offer of troops was in writing. Speaker 1 reiterates that he offered 10,000 troops for January 6 and emphasizes that this fact is in writing, arguing that the prosecution is attempting to suppress relevant evidence. He maintains that Pelosi’s leadership and decisions about security are central to the discussion, and he reiterates the claim that the offer of security was not acted upon. The conversation pivots back to the assertion that the Capitol Police Chief’s past statements support the claim that January 6 was preventable with proper intelligence and resources.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jack Smith says he doesn't want you to be able to introduce evidence in your defense that maybe the January was preventable, that police and others had, engaged in some security failures, intelligence failures beforehand. Your reaction real quickly to the prosecutor's request today. Speaker 1: No. Can you believe this? He's tried to defend Nancy Pelosi and the mayor of DC, but he tried to defend Nancy Pelosi who did not do the job. We offered them, as you know, 10,000 troops or national guard, whatever they wanted before the event, because I knew it was gonna be a very big event. And I it wasn't my event. I went and showed up and made a speech. We offered 10,000 people and more if necessary. And if they use 500 people, if they use 200 people, January 6 wouldn't have been January 6. So they can you imagine? This guy says, we don't wanna introduce that. Well, that's a very big part of it. She was responsible for January 6 because she didn't take the security that we offered her. We offered her 10,000 troops And, you know, you had far fewer people than that. It was a very small group of people relatively compared to the people listening to the speech was which was, by the way, the largest number of people that I've ever spoken before. Nobody ever talks about that, John. They talk about the group that went down and peacefully and patriotically, as I said, as you know, they don't mention that either. You know, that wasn't even brought up in the unselect committee. They didn't even use those words. They didn't say that I said the words peacefully and patriotically. This is a very dishonest group of people. And the deranged prosecutor, Jack Smith, he's a deranged human being, unattractive both inside and out. And you look at this guy, he doesn't want me to say that they turned down and they turned it down in writing, by the way. And what happened is, as you know, the unselect committee deleted and threw out everything. They threw everything out, which would be illegal. If you ever did that in a court, a regular court as a civilian, could you imagine somebody on the right, a republican or something somebody doing as you know, they deleted and threw out all everything having to do with the hearings because a lot of bad things were said about Nancy Pelosi. A lot of bad things were said about a lot of people that they didn't wanna get out to the public. So they threw out everything. They deleted everything. There is no information. There's nothing left. It's like crazy. And the reason he doesn't wanna do that is because they illegally destroyed everything. They destroyed all evidence. So he wants to do this because of the fact that they destroyed all evidence. They don't have the evidence anymore. And a lot of that evidence was pinpointing that Nancy Pelosi didn't take the troops days in advance. Said it. And I said it loud and clear. And they know I said it because I believe it was the mayor wrote a letter back that she doesn't want the troops. Speaker 0: Yeah. I know. It's exciting. Speaker 1: It's Yeah. But can you imagine a man saying, we're not allowed to bring the fact up that I offered 10,000 troops for January 6? Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: He's you know, look. He's got a bad record. He's lost a lot of cases, and he loses them because he goes too far. He's a sick puppy. Speaker 0: Well, it's important to note the Capitol Police Chief, the former chief Steve Sun, said on this show that January 6 was a preventable event. Had they gotten the intelligence and the resources that he had asked, you offered them. It just didn't happen. It's just an amazing thing. Sir, I wanna turn to Speaker 1: I offered them. It's true. Speaker 0: Yeah. No. There's no doubt. It's in writing.

@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)

ICYMI: Jack Smith Is Trying to Block J6 Evidence that Proves Pelosi Rejected Troops Offered by President Trump Watch @jsolomonReports full interview with President Trump on #JustTheNewsNoNoise here: https://rumble.com/v43o9fw-just-the-news-exlusive-interview-with-president-trump.html

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@gatewaypundit - The Gateway Pundit

America in Distress: How to Help the Hundreds of Political Prisoners Still Held Today by the Biden Regime and Save America from Communism – by J6 Prisoner Isaac A. Thomas via @gatewaypundit https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/01/america-distress-how-help-hundreds-political-prisoners-still/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=america-distress-how-help-hundreds-political-prisoners-still

America in Distress: How to Help the Hundreds of Political Prisoners Still Held Today by the Biden Regime and Save America from Communism - by J6 Prisoner Isaac A. Thomas | The Gateway Pundit | by Guest Contributor           Guest post by January 6 political prisoner Isaac A. thegatewaypundit.com

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@DC_Draino - DC_Draino

Source of full video https://rumble.com/v2fkvuq-undercover-mpd-footage-from-jan-6..html

undercover MPD footage from Jan 6. undercover MPD footage from Jan 6. https://t.me/StopHateChat/20086 rumble.com

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@DC_Draino - DC_Draino

🚨BREAKING: Cell phone video of DC officer on J6 saying “we go undercover as Antifa in the crowd” They’re ADMITTING it How many cops & federal agents were undercover that day? How many instigated violence & property destruction? Release the J6 tapes!

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@realDonaldTrump - Donald J. Trump

I am asking for everyone at the U.S. Capitol to remain peaceful. No violence! Remember, WE are the Party of Law & Order – respect the Law and our great men and women in Blue. Thank you!

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@catmurphy209 - Americat 🇺🇸

It has been three years since the murder of Ashli Babbitt. Judicial Watch launches lawsuit against US government for wrongful death of Ashli Babbitt. "Lt. Byrd did not give Ashli any warnings or commands before shooting her dead." https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-judicial-watch-launches-lawsuit-against-us-government-for-wrongful-death-of-ashli-babbitt

BREAKING: Judicial Watch launches lawsuit against US government for wrongful death of Ashli Babbitt “Lt. Byrd did not give Ashli any warnings or commands before shooting her dead.” thepostmillennial.com

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#ReleaseJ6PoliticalPrisoners! @gatewaypundit Article...

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

Everyone can see, if you’re looking…

@RealFletch17 - Fletch17

Wow! Good clip of the signs and warnings they give to their puppets. Hey @LeaderMcConnell looks like you saw a ghost…….

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@Pro__Trading - Pro America Politics

JUST IN: President Trump says the FBI was "leading the charge" on J6. Cue liberal meltdown...

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that there were many of them, noting that there was Antifa and there was FBI, along with a lot of other people there, all leading the charge. “You saw the same people that I did.” The passage ends with, “But just as…”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And those people have to be many of them. I guess there's some. By the way, there was Antifa and there was FBI. There were a lot of other people there too leading the charge leading the charge. You saw the same people that I did. But just as

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP #RayEpps was a Fed

@bamajayt - Bama_Jeans

@DarrenJBeattie about Ray EPPS compared to other Jan 6 protesters I can feel the anger swelling in me again...😡

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter

FEDS AND INFORMANTS EVERYWHERE ON J6 "This is much worse than you can imagine" FBI had agents everywhere on January 6th. The FEDS lost count of how many paid informants there were and had to do an audit to find out. Credit: @TheRedactedInc

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter

THERE IS NO BASIS FOR ARRESTING THE J6 PRISONERS. J6 was a setup. The police allowed protestors to enter. They need to be released immediately.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: The material comes from the United States Department of Justice and shows surveillance video of the Upper West Terrace doors of The United States Capitol on 01/06/2021. Just after 02:33 PM, police officers allow five individuals to exit the Capitol through the Upper West Terrace doors. At 02:34 PM, a gentleman holding an American flag catches the door just as the last protester leaves. He turns to the crowd outside and waves towards the door. At the same time at 02:34 PM, a gentleman with a red cap approaches the interior doors. As the police officer notices him, he continues to approach. The police officer holds the door for the protester as he enters the Capitol undeterred. At 02:35 PM, a large group enters the interior of the Capitol, police standing at the doors. As a steady stream of protesters enters through the Upper West Terrace doors, they can see police officers standing at the interior doors allowing people to pass. Around 250 protesters entered through the Upper West Terrace doors that day, many of which are charged with felony obstruction for entering a building undeterred. At 02:36 PM, a police officer walks towards the exit against the flow of protesters. He then turns around and begins walking with the protesters. He turned his back to them and never took a posture that was defensive or that would indicate that he feared being harmed. At 02:36:54, the police allow the crowd to pass. At 02:38 PM, a woman with a sock hat and a camera with a sound recording device attached to it films police as they allow people to enter. A steady stream of individuals pass by police as they stand aside without deterring protesters for several minutes. At 02:40 PM, police stopped the protesters to speak to them again. At 02:44 PM, a police officer in the bottom of the screen can be seen speaking to the officers in front of them and pulling them away, indicating to the crowd that they are allowed to enter. The officers then turn their backs to the crowd, which indicate that they did not possess fear of the protesters. The officers then escort the crowd into the interior of the Capitol. At 02:47 PM, police wearing yellow gear close the doors. Police presence then increases and no more individual.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Was obtained from the United States Department of Justice. It contains surveillance video of the Upper West Terrace doors of The United States Capitol on 01/06/2021. Just after 02:33PM, police officers allow five individuals to exit the capital through the Upper West Terrace doors. At 02:34PM, a gentleman holding an American flag catches the door just as the last protester leaves. He turns to the crowd outside and waves towards the door. At the same time at 02:34PM, a gentleman with a red cap approaches the interior doors. As the police officer notices him, he continues to approach. The police officer holds the door for the protester as he enters the capital undeterred. At 02:35PM, a large group enters the interior of the Capitol, police standing at the doors. As a steady stream of protesters enter through the Upper West Terrace doors, they can see police officers standing at the interior doors allowing people to pass. Around 250 protesters entered to the Upper West Terrace doors that day, many of which are charged with felony obstruction for entering a building undiscouraged. At 02:36PM, a police officer walks towards the exit against the flow of protesters. He then turns around and begins walking with the protesters. He turned his back to them and never took a posture that was defensive or that would indicate that he feared being harmed. At 02:36 fifty four, the police allow the crowd to pass. At 02:38PM, a woman with a sock hat and a camera with a sound recording device attached to it films police as they allow people to enter. A steady stream of individuals pass by police as they stand aside without deterring protesters for several minutes. At 02:40PM, police stopped the protesters to speak to them again. At 02:44PM, a police officer in the bottom of the screen can be seen speaking to the officers in front of them and pulling them away, indicating to the crowd that they are allowed to enter. The officers then turn their backs to the crowd, which indicate that they did not possess fear of the protesters. The officers then escort the crowd into the interior of the capital. At 02:47PM, police wearing yellow gear close the doors. Police presence then increases and no more individual.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter

J6: A TRUE TIMELINE FULL DOCUMENTARY J6: A True Timeline presents a never-before-seen timestamped blueprint for the events of January 6, 2021, as they unfolded in real-time. Credit: @InvestigateJ6 https://open.ink/collections/j6

J6 Thousands of crowdsourced video files. Hundreds of hours of CCTV footage. Dozens of police officer body cams. One True Timeline. open.ink

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter

NANCY PELOSI'S DAUGHTER ADMITTING J6 WAS A HOAX Nancy Pelosi's daughter was secretly recorded talking about the fake staged J6 insurrection. Shall we keep going? You don't have to answer that.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the political and legal dynamics surrounding potential investigations and trials, focusing on timing, venue, and public interest. - They agree that if Democrats lose the House and the committee is eliminated, public interest may wane. The first trials, if they occur, are expected to attract a lot of attention, similar to anniversaries, but interest could fade once Democrats are out of power and especially if Biden is removed from office. - The idea of dragging proceedings out is considered, with caution that delaying too long could reduce attention. They suggest not initiating a first trial in Washington, DC, because DC has many government workers and may be sympathetic to the defense; this relates to concerns about the potential jury pool. - There is a debate about whether the trial should be moved out of DC. Speaker 1 believes it would be difficult to move the trial and that those in DC would resist removal, arguing that hearings would be seen as fair and the jury would be impartial if held there, contrasting with Speaker 0’s concern about DC’s jury demographics. - They discuss the likelihood of successfully moving the trial, with Speaker 1 asserting that it would not be successfully moved and that the defense or supporters would resist. - The conversation touches on a hypothetical interaction with an individual who might have been involved in insurrection plans. Speaker 0 asks about what the plan would be if such an individual were in line and marching, in a military context, suggesting a scenario where operations would be outlined: “you’re gonna go here,” “you’re gonna go in by this side,” “at this time, we’re gonna take over this.” They describe the insurrection as lacking guns and involving a man “smoking pot,” noting it as the most pitiable insurrection of the 21st century. - They shift to an observation about the Proud Boys, mentioning Gavin McGinnis. Speaker 0 describes knowing Gavin from road trips to parties and finding the term “Proud Wizards” humorous when they first heard it in Brooklyn years ago. Speaker 0 characterizes McGinnis as a provocateur who says shocking things to be funny, and expresses amusement at his elevation to a prominent figure. - Speaker 0 clarifies that they have a personal history with these people and emphasizes that McGinnis says outrageous things, which they view in a historical and somewhat humorous light, contrasting with the contemporary prominence of the group. - The exchange ends with Speaker 0 explaining their familiarity with the individuals and reiterating that the portrayal of these figures is part of their broader historical context.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I think the one thing, if you drag it out after the Democrats lose the house Yeah. Yeah. And then they get rid of the committee Right. People may lose interest. Yeah. The first trials are gonna get a lot of attention. Yes. It's like anniversaries. If the first one Speaker 1: is a Speaker 0: big deal, they're gonna really be dealing the same. Right. No one's gonna care after the democrats out of power. Right. And then take Biden out of office, then who cares? If you drag it out long enough, I wouldn't go first for a trial because DC is a lot of people who work for the government. Right. And it's a lot of I don't think I'm sympathetic. Speaker 1: That's our the jury. That's the that's the jury issue. We we don't need the trial to be held there. Speaker 0: Well, you guys would, you totally hit off. Speaker 1: I I would. They won't successfully Speaker 0: successfully move move it? It? Speaker 1: No. They won't move it. Because I mean, think about it. They'll they'll resist it. They'll say how I've heard of the hearings. The team. They'll you're say They're in the next say we're not we're not fair. We're fair. Speaker 0: Thank you for your Speaker 1: time. Oh, absolutely. Speaker 0: Listen. I really I I know you're not the bad guy. I mean, if there is I haven't found the bad guy yet. But if there is, I Speaker 1: know you're not guy. I mean, he's he's like a stereotypical bad guy. Speaker 0: But I the the thing is why I asked you the question of, like, so what was the plan is Speaker 1: that Really? Speaker 0: If there was a if there was an interaction, you were you were supposed to be in line marching you're in the military. Speaker 1: You know this? No. Doesn't Speaker 0: You must have a plan. Speaker 1: Exactly. You just go to operations. It's over. You sit down Like Overnight your soldiers. You go over. Alright. You're gonna go here. You're gonna go in by this side. At this time, we're gonna take over this there's none of that. You move the insurrection. It's the sorriest insurrection in in the twentieth twenty first century ever. No guns. A guy Speaker 0: guy People Speaker 1: think so. Guy smoking pot. You know, Speaker 0: on Oh, I love the guy smoking Yeah. Speaker 1: I like for history. Speaker 0: You're gonna be able to laugh about this one day. I don't know what the Proud Boys is, but I know Gavin McGinnis. I went on road trips with them to parties. It was so comical to me when I first started hearing about, like, Proud Wizards from this was, like, years ago when they started saying in Brooklyn where he's from. I was like, what? This guy I mean, he may say he may talk shit, but a lot of it is, like, he's a provocateur. He says it to, like, be funny or whatever. Right. The idea that he's now being elevated to being this Yeah. It totally makes me laugh because I'm like, like, I know this guy. I've been in many parties with him, and I know he just says some crazy shit. I know the I mean, I know the Brooklyn version of those guys, Speaker 1: and I was just Speaker 0: like So I just wanted you to know that. Like, I have a whole history with these people, I'm like, come on. You're you're like, that's just kinda like anyway.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@B_Smallberries - Biff Smallberries

🗳️ STOLEN ELECTIONS & THE 2020 COUP @battleofever @RedpillDrifter J6 - They Needed an Emergency Session 👉🏼 YES !! This Fed-led 'riot' distraction was NOT about 'getting Trump and MAGA' - it was a vehicle to allow Corrupt Congress to STEAL the election. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/01/06/fedsurrection-anniversary-day-they-needed-an-emergency-session/

Fedsurrection Anniversary Day - They Needed an Emergency Session - The Last Refuge In honor of our national gaslighting embarrassment, the third anniversary of the FBI’s fedsurrection, the FBI laughed in the faces of the general population under their control.  The DC-based FBI sent out this message: Yes, the national kidnappers have removed their masks. Y’all know what that metaphor means. Once again, for those who just walked […] theconservativetreehouse.com

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

[Thread] #J6 (Below) Ongoing Compilation of #J6TrueTimeline Next up: 🔥 RINOs 🔥 who prepared statements beforehand, we're in on the setup, and used it as a way to dump #Trump. We are taking names. Another Thread Incoming. #J6WasASetup #AshliBabbitt #RINOsKnew

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@hollywood2pt0 - Jewely💎Blue

📽️The live footage of J6 [they] fed us was NOT LIVE Yes things happened there, but guaranteed what we were FED on NOT-live TV, as well as the pics after-the-fact, were sensationalized...MANIPULATED... PRODUCED SMOKE & MIRRORS Lest we forget what President Trump recorded, that Twitter & the rest of MSM took down to FRAME him and US.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes that on 07/18/2023 special counsel Jack Smith has decided to pursue another arrest and more indictments of President Trump, alleging it is a result of the Fed storming the Capitol on 01/06/2021 and targeting Trump for his role in the effort to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power on that date. He asserts that all President Trump did was give a speech and that he incited nothing. He claims the people disrupting the peaceful transfer of power were “our government.” He argues that when videos from the Capitol appeared, Tucker Carlson, while still on Fox News, claimed the videos were manipulated, asserting they were added to with people, sound, fire, and smoke, probably mirrors, to make it look horrific. He says footage has been removed from the Internet, making reflection on 01/06 difficult, and that all remaining footage is manipulated, stating there was not all the fire and smoke and that the famous picture is a manipulated image. He asserts the rioters didn’t bring guns and that there was no fire or smoke, but instead “where there’s smoke, there’s fire,” and that history has been changed and references are no longer available. He claims that during the Fed’s direction, Trump did say on video what he should have said, including “I know your pain. I know your hurt. We had an election stolen from us, but you have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to respect our great people in law and order. There’s nothing more he could have said.” He notes the video is difficult to find but exonerates Trump, maintaining he incited nothing, especially since the feds were doing most of it. He says this video will be important in the coming weeks and months as Smith continues to go after Trump, predicting suppression of the video by social media platforms, as in the immediate aftermath of the Fed’s direction. He says he captured the video and urges sharing. Speaker 1 quotes Trump: “I know you’re pained. I know you’re hurt. We had an election that was stolen from us. It was a landslide election, and everyone knows it, especially the other side. But you have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to have law and order. We have to respect our great people in law and order. We don’t want anybody hurt. It’s a very tough period of time. There’s never been a time like this where such a thing happened, where they could take it away from all of us, from me, from you, from our country. This was a fraudulent election, but we can’t play into the hands of these people. We have to have peace. So go home. We love you. You’re very special. You’ve seen what happens. You see the way others are treated that are so bad and so evil. I know how you feel, but go home and go home at peace.” Speaker 0 adds that Tucker Carlson claimed Democrat party and those involved in planning and organizing the insurrection hired a Good Morning America producer to dramatize the footage and even dubbed in sound, to make it more sensational, implying the footage was staged. He questions why it would be necessary to add sound and create more people and fire or smoke to redefine the events, suggesting the feds planted and altered footage to present an insurrection. Speaker 2 reinforces the claim with a direct statement: “How staged and fraudulent was the work of the January 6 committee? Democrats hired a Good Morning America producer called James Goldston to dramatize the footage they released. They even dubbed in audio to make the pictures more sensational as in a docudrama. The networks carried it all live as if it were real.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's 07/18/2023. And as most of you already know, special counsel Jack Smith has decided to throw another arrest, and god only knows how many more indictments towards president Trump. And it's completely a result of the Fed storming the capital on 01/06/2021. And Smith is going after president Trump for president Trump's role in the effort to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power on 01/06/2021, which is funny because all president Trump did was give a speech. He incited nothing. The people that were disrupting the peaceful transfer of power were, well, they were our government. And And after all this happened, when videos started coming out from the capital, Tucker Carlson, while still on Fox News, was the one who said what I've been saying all along, that the videos were manipulated. They, I knew, added people and sound and fire and smoke and probably mirrors to make it look horrific because it's hard to do this now because we have nothing to reference. They've removed it from the Internet, but when it was happening on the sixth, I hope you all remember that everybody that was in Washington DC while that was going on, they were having trouble getting any video or footage out to any of us on Twitter or in other states. Washington DC did exactly what they did when I was at the million mega march with my brother in November a few months prior, and they cut Internet. They wouldn't let anybody get information or very little information out. So now it's hard to reflect back on what January 6 was because all the footage has been removed from the Internet. More so, any of the footage that you can still see from 01/06/2021, mark my words, it's manipulated footage. Remember back. Think really hard. There was not all the fire and the smoke. You know that picture we all know? This one right here? This is a manipulated picture. They didn't do all of this. These people that were storming the capital didn't even bring guns with them to this insurrection. There was no fire. There was no smoke. But where there's smoke, there's fire. They've changed the history, what we saw with our eyes, and now we can't recollect it because they've removed it and our ability to reference anything. All that said, during the Fed's erection, president Trump got on video and said exactly what he should have said. This video that I'm putting up here on both Rumble and BitShoot tonight is very difficult to find unless you use the right search words, but it exonerates president Trump. Not that he needs exoneration because he incited nothing, especially because the feds were doing most of it. He said all the right words. I know your pain. I know your hurt. We had an election stolen from us, but you have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to respect our great people in law and order. There's nothing more he could have said. This is going to be a very important video coming up in the next weeks and months as Smith continues to go after president Trump. They have nothing. They are going to be suppressing this, and just like they did right after the Fed's direction, everybody that put it on Twitter or any social media platform, they would rip it down. They would suspend the person that post it. It's gonna happen again because this piece of video is everything they don't want out there for the rest of the world to see. So I've captured it for you. Share it with anyone you'd like, and get ready for the ride. Speaker 1: I know you're pained. I know you're hurt. We had an election that was stolen from us. It was a landslide election, and everyone knows it, especially the other side. But you have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to have law and order. We have to respect our great people in law and order. We don't want anybody hurt. It's a very tough period of time. There's never been a time like this where such a thing happened, where they could take it away from all of us, from me, from you, from our country. This was a fraudulent election, but we can't play into the hands of these people. We have to have peace. So go home. We love you. You're very special. You've seen what happens. You see the way others are treated that are so bad and so evil. I know how you feel, but go home and go home at peace. Speaker 0: And just in case you missed it, this is actually out of my video when Tucker Carlson said, this was back in March or April, that the Democrat party and those involved in planning and organizing this insurrection, that they hired a Good Morning America producer to make it more sensational, and they even dubbed in sound. No. Really think about that. What would be the reason of all the reasons in the world that it would be okay, needed, necessary for those feds that planted the feds' erection to say, here's all this capital video footage. What can we do here to it that we shouldn't be doing? Well, if we add sound and we create more people and we add in fire and smoke, then all of a sudden, this becomes an insurrection. This is the footage we're gonna put out into the public. Anyway, here's Tucker and what he said just a few months ago laying it out there, and it's almost like it didn't happen. Most people didn't even catch him saying this, but it's huge. Speaker 2: How staged and fraudulent was the work of the January 6 committee? Democrats hired a Good Morning America producer called James Goldston to dramatize the footage they released. They even dubbed in audio to make the pictures more sensational as in a docudrama. The networks carried it all live as if it were real.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@USA_Anne711 - ❣️Anne❣️

EXPLOSIVE REPORT: Army Official Says Mark Milley Delayed National Guard Response to Jan 6 ‘Then Lied About It’. Colonel Earl G. Matthews, senior legal adviser to Major General William J. Walker, who commanded the Washington D.C. National Guard told reporter Neil McCabe: “Milley controlled the Army”, arguing that while the Joint Chiefs boss lacked legal authority within the chain of command, he instead leveraged his profound influence and contacts in the Pentagon to delay the Guard’s response. “The problem was not with Donald Trump; it’s Mark Milley and the Army leadership in control. They stopped the Guard from coming then lied about it and said the Guard acted at sprint speed,” Matthews explained. “This is about civilian control of the military. There was none. There is none. I argue that — Mark Milley had more control over the D.C. Guard on Jan. 6 than Donald Trump did — if Donald Trump wanted to call the Guard to go to the Capitol, Milley wouldn’t let him do it.” Details👇 https://thenationalpulse.com/2024/01/12/explosive-report-army-official-says-mark-milley-delayed-national-guard-response-to-jan-6-then-lied-about-it/

EXPLOSIVE REPORT: Army Official Says Mark Milley Delayed National Guard Response to Jan 6 'Then Lied About It'. Colonel Earl G. Matthews, senior legal adviser to Major General William J. Walker, who commanded the Washington D.C. National Guard on January 6th, 2021, thenationalpulse.com

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP!

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

BOMBSHELL.🚨 "It has come out in a recent federal lawsuit that U.S. Capitol Police Lt. Michael Byrd... issued a false radio report that 'shots were fired'..." Ashli Babbitt’s Shooter Michael Byrd Made a False Radio Call Shortly After Fatal Incident https://thepoliticsbrief.com/ashli-babbitts-shooter-michael-byrd-made-a-false-radio-call-shortly-after-fatal-incident/

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@paulsperry_ - Paul Sperry

BREAKING: Obama DOJ official Mary McCord--part of Gen. Flynn coup--secretly worked with J6 Committee's Red Team + Purple Team investigators “We’re already starting to put together a team to think through the most damaging types of things [Trump] might do" https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/trump-military-fears-rcna129159

Fears grow that Trump will use the military in ‘dictatorial ways’ if he returns to the White House Donald Trump is sparking fears among those who understand the inner workings of the Pentagon. nbcnews.com
goddeketal
Posted - July 15, 2024 at 12:58 AM
Saved - July 15, 2024 at 1:58 AM

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

The mainstream media is complicit! https://t.co/U2D3fX4xMa

its_The_Dr
Posted - September 13, 2024 at 9:28 AM
Saved - September 13, 2024 at 10:30 AM

@its_The_Dr - Johnny Midnight ⚡️

Trump had this to say on Jan 6, Twitter and all media Platforms took it down. https://t.co/gYQCvSecup

Video Transcript AI Summary
We have to have law and order and respect our great people in law and order. We don't want anybody hurt during this very tough period of time. There's never been a time like this where they could take it away from all of us, from me, from you, from our country. This was a fraudulent election, but we can't play into the hands of these people. We have to have peace. So go home, we love you, you're very special, you've seen what happens, you see the way others are treated that are so bad and so evil. I know how you feel, but go home and go home in peace.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have to have law and order. We have to respect our great people in law and order. We don't want anybody hurt. It's a very tough period of time. There's never been a time like this where such a thing happened, where they could take it away from all of us, from me, from you, from our country. This was a fraudulent election, but we can't play into the hands of these people. We have to have peace. So go home, we love you, you're very special, you've seen what happens, you see the way others are treated that are so bad and so evil. I know how you feel, but go home and go home in peace.
LauraLoomer
Posted - December 12, 2024 at 6:08 PM
Saved - December 13, 2024 at 12:55 AM

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

Today the media decided to tell us what we have known for 4 years. There were at least 26 confidential sources in the crowd on J6 who went into the Capitol, 3 of whom the FBI asked to attend. FBI informants entered the Capitol on J6. It was all a set up to jail Trump supporters.

liz_churchill10
Posted - December 13, 2024 at 4:06 AM
Saved - December 13, 2024 at 4:37 AM

@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill

THROW the J6 Committee in Prison. The J6 ‘Riot’ was orchestrated by Nancy Pelosi and others…to ‘Set the Stage’ to entrap Trump Supporters and to label them as Domestic Terrorists. Nancy Pelosi’s daughter filmed it. https://t.co/xaOKqUESV0

Video Transcript AI Summary
We need to finish the proceedings. Senators are in a secure location, but there's chaos outside with tear gas masks being put on. There's a call for the National Guard and other law enforcement to restore order as windows are being broken and offices ransacked. The situation is dire, with concerns for personal safety and calls for the president to urge the crowd to disperse. Discussions are ongoing about how to clean up and secure the Capitol, which may take days. However, there is hope that the House and Senate could resume in about an hour.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have got to get to finish the proceedings. Speaker 1: USA. USA. Speaker 2: USA. Senator Schumer is at a secure location, and they're locked down Speaker 0: in the senate. There has to be some way we Speaker 3: can maintain the sense that people have that there's, some security or some confidence that government can function and that we can elect the president of the United States. Did we go back into session? Speaker 2: We did go back into session, but now, apparently, everybody on the floor is putting on tear gas masks to prepare for a breach. Well, I'm trying to get more information. They're putting on their tear gas masks. Speaker 4: I can't. Speaker 5: We need a area for the house members. They're all walking over now through the tunnel. Speaker 0: Bring her out. Speaker 1: Bring her out. Out there. It's a week. Speaker 0: Hey. What's coming in if you don't bring her out? Speaker 1: I'm gonna call up the effing secretary of DOD. We have some senators who are still in their hideaways. They need massive personnel now. Can you get the Maryland National Guard to come too? Speaker 3: I have something to say, mister secretary. Well, I'm gonna call the the mayor of Washington DC right now and see what, other outreach she has, other police departments as that leader lawyer has mentioned. Hi, governor. This is Nancy. Governor, I don't know if you had been approached about the, Virginia National Guard. Mister Hoyer was connect speaking to, governor Hogan, but I still think you probably need the okay of the, the federal government in order to come into another jurisdiction. Speaker 1: Thank you. The cemetery of the army. Speaker 0: Oh my gosh. Speaker 3: They're just breaking windows. They're doing all all kinds. It's really that somebody they said somebody was shot. It's just it's just horrendous and all at the instigation of the president of the United States. Speaker 1: Any national Speaker 3: Okay. Thank you, governor. I appreciate what you're doing. And if you don't mind, I'd like to stay in touch. Thank you. Speaker 0: Okay. Thank you. So Speaker 1: Virginia Guard has been called in. Speaker 3: You're not just talking to governor Northam. And what he said is they sent 200 of state police and a unit of the National Guard. They're breaking windows and going in, obviously, ransacking our offices and all the rest of that. That's nothing. The concern we have about personal Speaker 1: car Safety. Speaker 3: Personal safety is it just transcends everything. But the fact is, on any given day, they're breaking the law in many different ways. And and quite frankly, much of it at the instigation of the president of the United States. And now, if if he could could at least, somebody Speaker 1: Yeah. Why don't you get the president to tell them to leave the capital, mister attorney general, and your law enforcement responsibility? A public statement they should all leave. USA USA USA USA USA USA USA. This cannot be just we're waiting for so and so. We need them there now, whoever you got. Speaker 4: You have Okay. You also have troops. This is steady Hoyer troops. Speaker 3: Okay. So we have a to Speaker 0: make that decision. Speaker 4: Andrews Air Force Base. Alright. Other military bases. Speaker 3: Thank you. Speaker 1: We need Speaker 4: active duty, national guard. How soon in the future can you have the place evacuated, clothing, cleaned out? Speaker 0: Well, Judge Prescents just Prescents for a moment it was the ring bomb Speaker 2: or the lighthouse or some other entity Speaker 3: that was under siege. Speaker 0: And let me say, you can go just as we get people there as you make the plan. Speaker 3: We're trying to figure out how we can get this job done today. We talked to Mitch about it earlier. He's not in the room right now, but he was with us earlier, and said, you know, we want to expedite this and hopefully, they could confine it to just one complaint, Arizona. And then we could vote and and that would be, you know, then just move forward with the rest of the state. The overriding wish is to do it at the capitol. What we are being told very directly is it's gonna take days for the capitol to be okay again. We've gotten Speaker 0: a very bad report about the condition Speaker 3: of of the house floor with defecation and all that kind of thing as well. I don't think that that's hard to clean up, but I do think it is, more from a security standpoint of making sure that everybody is out of the building, and how long will that take? Speaker 0: I just got off with the vice president. Speaker 1: And I got off with the vice president-elect. 1st of all, I'm telling Speaker 0: you. Okay. Speaker 3: But what we left the conversation with because he said he had the impression from Mitch that Mitch wants to get everybody back to do it there. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 3: I said, well, we're getting a counterpoint that is we could take time, to clean up the poo poo that they're making all over them, literally and figuratively, in the Capitol and that, that it may take days to get back. Speaker 5: And so I'm at the Capitol building. I'm literally standing with, the chief of police of, of the US Capitol Police. He just informed me what you will hear through official channels, Mueller, Maker, Sergeant, and Arms. We'll inform you that their best information is that they believe that the house and the senate will be able, to reasonably be in roughly an hour. Speaker 1: Good news. Speaker 0: Thank you very much, mister Vice President. Have Speaker 5: a good
RedpillDrifter
Posted - January 6, 2025 at 5:37 PM
Saved - January 23, 2025 at 5:58 PM

@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter

NANCY PELOSI'S DAUGHTER ADMITTING J6 WAS A HOAX Nancy Pelosi's daughter was secretly recorded talking about the fake staged J6 insurrection. Shall we keep going? You don't have to answer that. https://t.co/In39G2bvVJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
If the Democrats lose the House, interest in the committee's work may wane. The initial trials will attract significant attention, but as time passes, especially if Democrats are out of power, public interest will likely diminish. The location of the trial is crucial; holding it in D.C. could present challenges due to the jury pool. There’s skepticism about moving the trial, as resistance is expected. The discussion shifts to the lack of a clear plan during the insurrection, highlighting its disorganized nature. Despite the serious implications, there are moments of levity regarding the individuals involved, particularly a known provocateur whose antics are seen as more performative than threatening. The speaker reflects on their personal history with these groups, emphasizing a more nuanced understanding of their motivations.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I think the one thing if you drag it out, after the democrats lose the Speaker 1: house Yeah. Speaker 0: And then they get rid of the committee Right. People may lose interest. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: The first trials are gonna get a lot of attention. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: It's like anniversaries. The first one is Speaker 1: a big deal. Speaker 0: They're gonna really Speaker 1: be deal. January 6th, Speaker 0: no one's gonna care after the Democrats are out of power. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: And then take Biden out of office, then who cares? If you drag it out long enough, I wouldn't go first for a trial because DC is a lot of people who work for government. Right. And it's a lot of I don't think that's Speaker 1: it, but that The jury that's the that's the Speaker 0: The jury issue is Speaker 1: we we don't need this trial to be held there. Speaker 0: Well, if you guys Speaker 1: move it, you totally shut off. I'm waiting for successfully move it? No. They'll they'll resist it. They'll say how I've heard of the hearings. They'll just they're gonna say they're gonna say we're not we're not fair. We're fair. Speaker 0: Thank you Speaker 1: for your time. Awesome. Speaker 0: Listen. I really, I I know you're not the bad guy. I mean, if Speaker 1: there is Speaker 0: I haven't found the bad guy yet. If there is, I know you're Speaker 1: not the bad guy. I mean, he's he's like a stereotypical bad guy. Speaker 0: But I the the thing of the why I asked you the question of, like, so what was the plan? Is that Oh. If there was an if there was an interaction, you're you're supposed to be in line marching. You're in the military. You know? Right. Speaker 1: No. It doesn't matter. Speaker 0: You're supposed to have a plan. Speaker 1: Exactly. You start off right in the shoulder. You sit down overnight with your soldiers. You go over. Alright. You're gonna go here. You're gonna go in by this site. At this time, we're gonna take over this. There's none of that. You do the insurrection. It's the sorryest insurrection in in the 20th 21st century ever. No guns. A guy A guy smoking A guy smoking potash on Oh, I love the Speaker 0: guy. Yeah. Speaker 1: I like for this You're Speaker 0: gonna be able to laugh about this one day. So I don't know what the Proud Boys is, but I know Gavin McGinnis. I went on road trips with them to parties. Mhmm. It was so committal to me when I first started hearing about, like, Proud Boys are smart. This was, like, years ago when they started saying in Brooklyn where he's from. 60. I was like, what? This guy mean, he may say he may talk shit, but a lot of it is like he's a provocateur. Speaker 1: He said it Speaker 0: to like be funny or whatever. But the idea that he's now being elevated to being this in my it totally makes me laugh because I'm like, look, I know this guy. I've been to many parties with him and I know he just says some crazy shit. I know the I mean, I know the Brooklyn version of those guys and I'm just like so I just wanted you to know that. Like, I have a whole history with these people and I'm like, come on. You're you're like, that's just kinda like anyway.
MilaLovesJoe
Posted - January 23, 2025 at 10:29 AM
Saved - January 23, 2025 at 5:57 PM

@MilaLovesJoe - Mila Joy

NANCY PELOSI'S DAUGHTER ADMITTING J6 WAS A HOAX Nancy Pelosi's daughter was secretly recorded talking about the fake staged J6 insurrection. Shall we keep going? You don't have to answer that. https://t.co/YwEo6MN1UA

Video Transcript AI Summary
If the Democrats lose the House and the committee disbands, interest may wane. The initial trials will attract significant attention, but after a change in power, the focus will likely diminish. The location of the trial is crucial; moving it could face resistance. There's skepticism about the planning behind the January 6th events, as it lacked military-like organization. It was a poorly executed insurrection, with no weapons involved. There’s a sense of irony in the portrayal of figures like Gavin McGinnis, who, despite being provocative, is now seen in a serious light. The speaker reflects on their past experiences with these individuals, emphasizing a disconnect between their past and current narratives.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I think the one thing if you drag it out, after the democrats lose the house Yeah. And then they get rid of the committee Right. People may lose interest. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: The first trials are gonna get a lot of attention. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: It's like anniversaries. The first one is Speaker 1: a big deal. They're gonna really be deal. January 6th, Speaker 0: no one's gonna care after the Democrats are out of power. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: And then take Biden out of office, then who cares? If you drag it out long enough, I wouldn't go first for a trial because DC is a lot of people who work for government. Right. And it's a lot of I don't think that's Speaker 1: it, but that The jury that's the that's the Speaker 0: The jury issue is Speaker 1: we we don't need this trial to be held there. Speaker 0: Well, if you guys Speaker 1: move it, you totally shut off. I'm waiting for successfully move it? No. They'll they'll resist it. They'll say how I've heard of the hearings. They'll just they're gonna say they're gonna say we're not we're not fair. We're fair. Speaker 0: Thank you for your time. Awesome. Listen. I really, I I know you're not the bad guy. I mean, if Speaker 1: there is Speaker 0: I haven't found the bad guy yet. If there is, I know you're Speaker 1: not the bad guy. I mean, he's he's like a stereotypical bad guy. Speaker 0: But I the the thing of the why I asked you the question of, like, so what was the plan? Is that Oh. If there was an if there was an interaction, you're you're supposed to be in line marching. You're in the military. You know? Right. Speaker 1: No. It doesn't matter. Speaker 0: You're supposed to have a plan. Speaker 1: Exactly. You start off right in the shoulder. You sit down overnight with your soldiers. You go over. Alright. You're gonna go here. You're gonna go in by this site. At this time, we're gonna take over this. There's none of that. You do the insurrection. It's the sorryest insurrection in in the 20th 21st century ever. No guns. A guy A guy smoking A guy smoking potash on Oh, I love the Speaker 0: guy. Yeah. Speaker 1: I like for this You're Speaker 0: gonna be able to laugh about this one day. So I don't know what the Proud Boys is, but I know Gavin McGinnis. I went on road trips with them to parties. Mhmm. It was so committal to me when I first started hearing about, like, Proud Boys are smart. This was, like, years ago when they started saying in Brooklyn where he's from. 60. I was like, what? This guy mean, he may say he may talk shit, but a lot of it is like he's a provocateur. Speaker 1: He said it Speaker 0: to like be funny or whatever. But the idea that he's now being elevated to being this in my it totally makes me laugh because I'm like, look, I know this guy. I've been to many parties with him and I know he just says some crazy shit. I know the I mean, I know the Brooklyn version of those guys and I'm just like so I just wanted you to know that. Like, I have a whole history with these people and I'm like, come on. You're you're like, that's just kinda like anyway.
JohnStrandUSA
Posted - February 12, 2025 at 9:10 PM
Saved - February 12, 2025 at 10:26 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

J6 wasn’t a protest—it was a setup. The government has admitted its involvement. They used FBI provocateurs, improper security, and had a pre-planned narrative ready. This was America’s Reichstag Fire—used to justify a crackdown on conservatives. https://t.co/FR9EpP8DvK

Video Transcript AI Summary
The government's involvement in January 6th is undeniable, with proven entrapment tactics. To put it simply, January 6th was our American Reichstag fire moment. Anyone familiar with the history of the Nazi campaign in Germany understands the implications of that statement. January 6th served the purposes of a deeply corrupt Biden regime.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The government has admitted and proved for the whole world to see without dispute that they were involved. They had entrapment elements in place. And so, like I said, you can generally see January 6 for what it is. If you wanna just distill it down in a single sentence, January 6 was our American Reichstag fire moment. And any student of history that generally understands the Nazi campaign in Germany knows what that means. That's right. But that is what January 6 was functioning, as for a very, very corrupt Biden regime.
KariLake
Posted - September 26, 2025 at 5:46 AM
Saved - September 27, 2025 at 6:36 PM

@KariLake - Kari Lake

They staged a riot on January 6 to frame patriotic Americans and cover-up a stolen election. Justice is coming ⚖️ https://t.co/6RZzNPevfD

View Full Interactive Feed