reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - March 14, 2023 at 8:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A web of lies has been spun around the COVID-19 pandemic. False statements have been repeated by many people and important channels. Propaganda has been pushed at and through our children. The threat to healthy children has been hyped up from day one. Deception comes in many forms, including perverted science. The Gain of Function Gang's propaganda is staggering. The public has yet to learn about some of the biggest lies. It's time to see through the continuous lies.

@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan

This statement was never true. No such data ever existed.

@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan

But it was repeated by so many people (and down so many important channels).

@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan

So many people...

@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan

This statement wasn't true either. It went from 100% to 90, 80, 70... I've seen it as low as 30%.

@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan

This was false...

@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan

So was this...

@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan

This was funny... well, not really. 🤬

@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan

THIS statement was criminal. 👇🖕 https://t.co/l0xmn9q5ce

@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan

The same entity owned up to that a few months later... https://t.co/JS6mo3kB7o

@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan

This was used in the context of kids and was never accurate. True propaganda. 🚨 https://t.co/ZuXEik1oiu

@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan

So much propaganda has been pushed at and through our children... https://t.co/wbp1AUIUpz

@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan

And yet SARS-CoV-2 has never presented an emergency to healthy children. No more so than many common ailments. They hype around the threat to kids has all been a lie. From day one. You have access to the data too... https://collections.nlm.nih.gov/master/borndig/101774952/Risk%20Factors%20for%20COVID-19%20Mortality%20among%20Privately%20Insured%20Patients%20-%20A%20Claims%20Data%20Analysis%20-%20A%20FAIR%20Health%20White%20Paper.pdf https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.11.30.21267048v1.full.pdf

@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan

Can a lie get any more heinous than this? 👇🚨 Pair it with those last two above. 🤬

@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan

Make it make sense...

@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan

Or maybe the things that don't seem to make any sense actually make a lot of sense. 🤔

@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan

Deception comes in many forms... 💡 https://t.co/gUsUfSqGhR

@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan

And they're still deceiving you, of course. Like broadcasting studies across The Show that arent peer-reviewed because Big Pharma funds them. 👇 Then use peer-review to keep good studies out. Here's a whole thread on how perverted science has become... 🧵 https://t.co/39DqNtgXIL

@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan

This is pure nonsense... https://t.co/BeiF8TN8NT

@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan

🙃

@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan

But I thought you said... I give up. 🤦‍♂️

@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan

Some of the biggest lies of all have yet to hit the public surface... 🚨 https://t.co/41qfJptIF7

@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan

Look at this phrasing. In a CNN piece, which you dig into and quickly see is just the Gain of Function Gang's propaganda. Staggering.

@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan

Meanwhile...

@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan

Meanwhile... https://t.co/H2BdMdQWRy

@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan

Meanwhile... 🤬 https://t.co/lYoUxWaCQk

@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan

https://t.co/UQqmRm40z0

@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan

A web of continuous lies... 👇🧵 https://t.co/RF0rYjE247

Saved - April 11, 2023 at 7:40 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A new study reveals that those who received the ClotShot vaccine may lose up to 25 years of life expectancy, with the average age of a ClotShot man decreasing from 80 to 55. Excess mortality views for Italy, USA, and Holland show a structural impact, with peaks after ClotShot rounds. The views from 2018-2019 show normal fluctuations, while 2020 had initial Covid waves and deadly treatment protocols. 2021-2022 show structural excess mortality.

@timingnl - Timothy Robert

ClotShot jabbed will lose up to 25 years of their life expectancy, a bombshell new study revealed The average age of a ClotShot man goes down from 80 to 55 I made 3 Excess Mortality views for Italy, USA & Holland, to show the structural ClotShot impact https://slaynews.com/news/fully-vaxxed-lose-25-years-life-expectancy-study-shows/ https://slaynews.com/news/fully-vaxxed-lose-25-years-life-expectancy-study-shows/

Fully Vaxxed Lose 25 Years of Life Expectancy, Study Shows Those who have been fully vaccinated for COVID-19 with mRNA shots will lose 25 years of their life expectancy, a bombshell new study has revealed. slaynews.com

@timingnl - Timothy Robert

About the 5 years of excess mortality views: 2018 & 2019 normal fluctuations 2020 the initial Covid waves during the start, and during the winter, with deadly treatment protocols 2021 & 2022 show structural excess mortality with peaks after the ClotShot rounds

Saved - November 21, 2023 at 10:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Title: Vaccine-Induced Long COVID: Examining the Evidence In a highly vaccinated population, 20% developed Long COVID, raising concerns about the role of vaccines. Claims suggesting that more vaccine doses offer protection against Long COVID are debunked. The data analysis reveals no significant difference in risk between the two-dose and >2 dose groups. Manipulative data separation and negative efficacy rates further question the vaccine's effectiveness. Additionally, a 2020 study highlights a significant increase in Long COVID cases post-vaccination. The evidence demands a closer examination of vaccine-induced Long COVID.

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

BOOM 💥💥💥💥 How much more evidence do you need that #LongCovid is a vaccine induced condition? 20% of a population in which 94% were "vaccinated" developed "Long COVID" That's it. Game over.

@NarfGb - 🕯NarfGB

@Jikkyleaks @tatiann69922625 @DoorlessCarp @53v3n0fn1n3 @Maples46014332 @knigotnik @kacdnp91 @Fynnderella1 @TracyBethHoeg @AGHuff Long COVID in a highly vaccinated population infected during a SARS-CoV-2 Omicron wave – Australia, 2022 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.08.06.23293706v1.full.pdf "But we saved them from Long Covid."™

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

A follow-up to clarify some things because there are claims in the paper that more vaccine doses creates some protection against #LongCOVID. This is demonstrably false.

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

Dunning Kruger returns. This is the table that @LanderPeterjohn is attempting the "gotcha" on. But there are four reasons why it's obvious that there is no "benefit" from more vaccine doses: 1⃣ there was NO significant difference between the two dose group and the >2 dose group (140/703 vs 1989/10994, p=0.22) in risk. The claim that the 4+ group had a lower risk required artificially separating out this group in order to get a "significant result". That's called p-hacking. 2⃣the two-dose group was combined with the unvaccinated group. This is comical data manipulation for this claim 3⃣ in Table 3 of the paper there was no difference in health service utilisation between the 4+ dose and other groups, yet 93% of the sufferers of had received at least 3 doses of vaccine. The 3+ dose rate (16+) for WA as at 1/1/23 was 79.3%. This gives a negative efficacy of -247% for preventing "Long COVID". This is the only conclusion that can be reliably drawn from the data provided. https://medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.08.06.23293706v1

Long COVID in a highly vaccinated population infected during a SARS-CoV-2 Omicron wave – Australia, 2022 medRxiv - The Preprint Server for Health Sciences medrxiv.org

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

This thread has been hit by far-left trolls like this one so will probably be locked soon. I'd really love to know who pays for all these people. Anyway it's a good way of getting a block list.

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

More on this thread as the pharma accounts try to cover up the findings...

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

.@_johnbye is struggling again to push a false narrative by only reading a conclusion that he doesn't understand instead of the data itself. That's why his posts can be easily dismissed and why he didn't post a link to the thread which contained the analysis

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

And just to drive home the very clear finding that the risk of Long COVID was massively increased after the vaccine roll out... Here is the main paper from 2020 showing that 90 day LC only occurred in 2.3% of patients pre-vax, not 20%

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

@Topaz20211 @SalvMattera 2.3%, which includes 1% or so background rate of those symptoms https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7611399/

Attributes and predictors of long COVID Reports of long-lasting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) symptoms, the so-called ‘long COVID’, are rising but little is known about prevalence, risk factors or whether it is possible to predict a protracted course early in the disease. ... ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

This thread ended up a bit confusing so I have reposted it, hopefully more clearly. https://t.co/p3R9Hmf0Vf

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

UPDATED 🧀🧀... Because so many Pharma advocates are trying to wriggle out of this really obvious fail of the COVID vaccines in preventing #LongCOVID I'll put it in a graph format, with references in the tweets to follow. @stkirsch @_johnbye @Johnincarlisle https://t.co/0ECXbQ2v4T

Saved - August 30, 2023 at 7:48 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The latest data from the ONS reveals COVID-19 deaths in England by vaccination status. Out of 8,330 deaths, 95% were vaccinated, while 436 deaths were among the unvaccinated. Surprisingly, the unvaccinated had a lower death rate than those who received four doses. Vaccination rates across the adult population were confirmed at 81.6% for dose 1, 78.7% for dose 2, and 64.3% for dose 3. The Spring Booster campaign saw a 155x higher mortality rate for the 4-dose vaccinated. The ONS admitted errors in the data, and now they've stopped reporting it altogether. The truth behind excess deaths remains unclear.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

🚨🚨 The ONS has finally released the COVID-19 ‘Deaths by Vaccination Status Data’ for 2023 in England🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 8,330 deaths were #Vaccinated (95%) 436 deaths were #Unvaccinated (5%) And STILL our Government pretends the jag prevents death with COVID…💉 https://ons.gov.uk/releases/deathsinvolvingcovid19byvaccinationstatusenglanddeathsoccurringbetween1april2021and31may2023 1/

Deaths involving COVID-19 by vaccination status, England: deaths occurring between 1 April 2021 and 31 May 2023 - Office for National Statistics Age-standardised mortality rates for deaths involving coronavirus (COVID-19) by vaccination status, broken down by age group. Deaths occurring between 1 April 2021 and 31 May 2023 in England. ons.gov.uk

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

COVID-19 ‘Deaths by Vaccination Status Data’ England, 2023 #Unvaccinated 436 deaths 5% 1 dose 💉 62 deaths 0.7% 2 dose💉💉 334 deaths 3.8% 3 dose💉💉💉 1,032 deaths 11.8% 4 dose 💉💉💉💉 6,902 deaths 78.7% They say the vaccine protects against death from COVID? 2/ https://t.co/GyHqifJf9Z

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

The ‘Base Rate Fallacy’ crew will no doubt claim +95% of the population are vaccinated-they are not Actual vaccination rates across the adult population 18+ was confirmed from NHS vaccination records: 81.6% dose 1 78.7% dose 2 64.3% dose 3 9M #Unvaccinated Source: 🇬🇧UK HSA 3/ https://t.co/EIGKvFBg9j

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Monthly age-standardised mortality rates (ASMR) By vaccination status for all cause deaths, per 100,000 person-years, England 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Age 18-39 The #Unvaccinated had a lower rate of death than 4 dose vaccinated 💉💉💉💉 4/ https://t.co/uXrlkynZpA

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Monthly age-standardised mortality rates (ASMR) By vaccination status for all cause deaths, per 100,000 person-years, England 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Age 40-49 The #Unvaccinated had a lower rate of death than 4 dose vaccinated 💉💉💉💉 5/ https://t.co/vVORa2ikYx

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

ONS confirms 201,564 deaths to 31st May 2023 194,506 were vaccinated (96.5%) 7,058 were unvaccinated (3.5%) The unvaccinated make up 18% of the adult population, yet only 3.5% of all-cause deaths & just 5% of ‘COVID’ deaths.. So, what is causing all of the #ExcessDeaths? 6/ https://t.co/zBwxGt5HfE

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Can the Prime Minister or Health Secretary answer this simple question ??

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

The Spring BOOSTER campaign ran from March - September 2022 During that period, the Age-standardised mortality rate for the 4-dose vaccinated, was 1.55 x Higher than the #unvaccinated This should have made no difference to all-cause mortality rates, so why the increase? 7/ https://t.co/LtsSpwtO3y

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Vaccination records from the NHS⬇️ 45M took Dose 1 43M took Dose 2 34M took Dose 3 (Booster) 22.5M took Dose 4+ The population of England is 57M Anyone saying 95% of the country took the vaccine is lying 9/ https://t.co/TvJbSj96G5

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

ONS admit their first error within the data Expect more This is what happens when data-sets are manipulated by hand, with unforeseen consequences popping up downstream ….. 10/ https://t.co/qPLj1kXt1O

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

ONS now confirming they will no longer be reporting ‘Death by Vaccination Status’ data … This is what happens when the data does not support their narrative They bury it If this data was positive for the vaccine, bet your life they’d be shouting it from the rooftops…📢 https://t.co/cU5hMreLlr

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Those 8,330 deaths are amongst 52,000 COVID deaths in the #Vaccinated since 1st April 2021 …. who’s fooling WHO here ….⬇️💥💥💥

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

💥 END GAME💥

Saved - October 4, 2023 at 7:43 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The rollout of vaccines coincided with a surge in all-cause mortality worldwide. Before the vaccines, mortality was localized to certain hotspots. Lockdowns increased mortality in comparison to non-locked down areas. Lack of treatment and government measures contributed to excess mortality. After vaccine rollout, mortality increased everywhere, with additional peaks associated with booster shots. Shockingly, the mortality risk per injection is consistent across countries, with one person dying for every 800 injections.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

This clip from Denis Rancourt (@denisrancourt) is a MUST WATCH. He looks into all-cause mortality before the rollout of the vaccine and after the rollout of the vaccine. Three important points: 1. Before the vax was rolled out, all cause mortality did not cross borders! "....They declare a pandemic on the 11th of March, 2020, and you get an immediate surge in that all-cause mortality in certain hotspots. So only occurring in New York, northern Italy, Madrid, Stockholm, a few places like that, very intense, very sharp surges of all-cause mortality right after they announced the pandemic. So the fact that it is coordinated, the fact that the timing of the event is related to a political event, the announcement of a pandemic, and that it is synchronous around the world..." "...it does not cross borders. If you look at European countries or states in the United States, you can have mortality in one jurisdiction and it stops at the border and it's not in the other. So this mortality at the beginning was related to what was being done in those jurisdictions. "We co-authored a paper where we showed that when you compare U.S. states, if you take states that share a border and one locked down and the other didn't, the all-cause mortality in the locked-down state, even though they're very similar and they're sharing a border, is always higher, significantly higher than in the non-locked-down state. So we're able to, we have a lot of reason to come to the very firm conclusion that what I believe now is that all of the excess all-cause mortality that occurred before the vaccines were rolled out, between when they announced to that time, is all due to lack of treatment and aggressive medical protocols in big hospitals and aggressive government measures that isolated people and stressed them out," 2. After rolling out the vaccines, all-cause mortality shot up everywhere. "And so this mortality is very heterogeneous until you start roll out the vaccines. Then once you start rolling out the vaccines, because that was done pretty much simultaneously around the world, you have everywhere an increase in all cause mortality. You move into a regime of higher all cause mortality, and then you stay there while you're rolling out the vaccines. And then every time you roll out a booster, you get a peak, an extra peak in all cause mortality associated in time with that booster" 3. And the bombshell....for every 800 injections, one person will die! "..we've now looked at over a hundred countries, the mortality risk per injection is pretty much the same everywhere. So all ages, it's about 0.1%. So one, actually we refined it recently as 0.126% with an error bar on it. And so that means that for every 800 injections, one person will die. "

Video Transcript AI Summary
Data on all-cause mortality collected over the past 100 years shows a clear seasonal pattern, with more deaths occurring in the winter than in the summer. This pattern is observed in northern latitude countries, while the opposite occurs in the Southern Hemisphere. COVID-19 pandemic announcements led to immediate surges in mortality in certain hotspots, but this synchronicity is inconsistent with the spread of a viral respiratory disease. Excess mortality before the vaccine rollout is attributed to lack of treatment, aggressive medical protocols, and government measures that isolated and stressed people. The rollout of vaccines and boosters is associated with increased all-cause mortality, with the risk of death per injection being higher for older individuals. The mortality risk per injection is approximately 0.1%, or 1 person per 800 injections.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That data never changes. And that data has been reliable since they've been doing this for 100 years now. It's very robust, very reliable data and it is collected irrespective of the cause of death. So this is just total deaths. Okay? So what you do then is you look at the pattern in time of those deaths in a given jurisdiction. It could be 1 state in the U. S, it can be the whole country or another country, and you follow it as a function of time. And what you will see immediately is that in northern latitude countries, it has a seasonal pattern, a very clear seasonal pattern. There are always far more deaths in the winter than in the summer. So there's a winter peak in all cause mortality. Then you go down to a summer trough. And this pattern has been known for 100 years. And what's interesting is in the Southern Hemisphere, that pattern is reversed because their winter is in our summer. So they get their maximum of deaths in that seasonal pattern during their winter, which is our summer. And this is a phenomenon that's well known. It's basic epidemiology. It's been known for 100 years. It's very striking. And it's not completely understood exactly why that is, okay, there are various models as to why the deaths are always higher in the winter, including deaths that are related to cardiac problems. The only deaths that don't follow that pattern are the main tumor type cancer deaths. They don't have a seasonal pattern. But everything else, the infections, the heart attacks, everything that is sensitive to stress, I guess, stress induced, they all have a very clear seasonal pattern, okay, in terms of mortality. And so you know what to expect because you have a pattern that you can see for 100 years and you can see it up and down and up and down. It's very regular. And then COVID hits and they announce a pandemic. They declare a pandemic on the 11th March 2020, And you get an immediate surge in that all cause mortality in certain hotspots. So only occurring in New York, Northern Italy, Madrid, Stockholm, a few places like that. Very intense, very sharp surges of all cause mortality right after they announced the pandemic. So the fact that it is coordinated the fact that the timing of the event is related to a political event, the announcement of a pandemic, and that it is synchronous around the world and that it's only in those hotspots. From our perspective, this cannot be the spread of a viral respiratory disease because it's well known that the time from seeding of a new pathogen in a population to when you get an actual surge in mortality, that time is extremely sensitive to the details of the population, of the society, of how they contact each other and so on. And it can vary by months or years even. So to have synchronicity like that is impossible, even with modern airplanes. Because even if you send out flights from the source all at the same time, then that's the seeding where they land. But then the time between that original seeding to when you'll get a surge in mortality is highly dependent on the local circumstances. So you can't have synchronicity like that. So this was clearly not related to COVID like spread or anything like that at the beginning. So that was the first thing we noticed. And then we kept studying all cause mortality. I've written more than 30 papers on COVID related things, analyzing data and so on. And what we find, Doctor. McCullough, is that the excess all cost mortality is inconsistent with a viral respiratory spread, absolutely inconsistent with it because it does not cross borders. If you look at European countries or states in the United States, you can have mortality in 1 jurisdiction and it stops at the border and is not in the other. So this mortality at the beginning was related to what was being done in those jurisdictions. So for example, we wrote a paper with John Johnson at Harvard University. We coauthored a paper where we showed that when you compare U. S. States, if you take states that share a border and one locked down and the other didn't, the all cause mortality in the lockdown state, even though they're very similar and they're sharing a border, is always higher, significantly higher than in the non lockdown state. So we're able to we have a lot of reason to come to the very firm conclusion that what I believe now is that all of the excess, all cause mortality that occurred before the vaccines were rolled out between when they announced to that time is all due to lack of treatment and aggressive medical protocols in big hospitals and aggressive government measures that isolated people and stressed them out, including very vulnerable people like the 11,000,000 who are disabled by serious mental illness in the United States, that kind of thing. So when you look at the age structure of this mortality and its geographical distribution and its association with all these things that they know were being done in these jurisdictions. We have concluded that there is no evidence for a particularly virulent new pathogen that was spreading, that, in fact, all of the excess mortality everywhere we've looked in the world can be understood in terms of this is what happens when you do this to people. This is what happens when you stop treating them for all the usual things that they have. And when you destroy their lives and stress them out and force them to be isolated, this is what you get. You get this kind of mortality. And so this mortality is very heterogeneous until you start roll out the vaccines. Then once you start rolling out the vaccines, because that was done pretty much simultaneously around the world, you have everywhere an increase in all cause mortality. You move into a regime of higher all cause mortality and then you stay there while you're rolling out the vaccines. And then every time you roll out a booster, you get a peak, an extra peak in all cause mortality, associated in time with that booster. And this is stunning. We see this and you can do it by age group. So you can look at the 90 plus year olds for the 80 to 90 year olds and so on. And you see a very sharp booster rollout because they did it very quickly in a given jurisdiction and immediately follows it is a very sharp, unprecedented peak in all cause mortality. So this is extremely clear it cannot be an accident. And therefore, you can quantify it. You can say, well, how many deaths occurred given how many injections you gave? So that's what we do. We've been quantifying it. And what's surprisingly is what we find is that around the world in every jurisdiction, we've now looked at over 100 countries, the mortality risk per injection is pretty much the same everywhere. So all ages, it's about 0.1%. So one actually, we refined it recently as 0.126 percent with an error bar on it. And so that means that for every 800 injections, 1 person will die. 1 person per 800 injections. Now the important thing is that that risk of death per injection is not uniform with age. It increases exponentially with age and it is dramatically higher the older you are. The doubling time by age is 4 to 5 years of age.
Saved - October 9, 2023 at 2:40 PM

@EpochTimes - The Epoch Times

‘No Lives Were Saved’ by COVID-19 Vaccines, Scientists Estimate As the number of deaths clearly increased, upon closer examination, they noticed that the excess deaths coincided with the timing of the #COVID19 vaccine program rollout.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Scientists studied the death rates in several countries during the pandemic and vaccine rollout. They found that all-cause mortality increased every time COVID-19 vaccines were deployed. In 9 out of 17 countries, there were no excess deaths before the vaccine campaign began. Unprecedented peaks in all-cause mortality were observed in January-February 2022, following the rollout of boosters in 15 of the 17 countries. The excess all-cause mortality during the vaccination period was 1,740,000 deaths across all ages and countries, with a vaccine dose fatality rate of almost 5% among those 90 years and older who received a 4th vaccine dose. The study found no evidence of a beneficial effect from COVID-19 vaccine rollouts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: These are the deaths that happened in Malaysia. It's a country in Southeast Asia. Scientists wanted to study what happened to the overall death rate during the pandemic, the deaths clearly increased. But, look, this is where the pandemic was declared, and this is when the vaccine program rolled out. Same thing happened in 9 other countries. Here's Australia. New Zealand. The Philippines. Singapore. After studying over a dozen countries in the southern hemisphere, the scientists concluded that after 13a half 1000000000 COVID vaccines that were given out worldwide, 17,000,000 people lost their lives from vaccines alone. And the death rate data for the elderly was just shocking. Welcome to frontline health. Understand Scoreback. In a new report that's yet to be peer reviewed, Canadian scientists looked at the pandemic from a thousand foot view. They wanted to see how much the pandemic affected all cause mortality. You see the virus can kill in many ways, not just from the visible infection symptoms. If you want to find the real cause of death, you have to dissect each and every single person who died for any reason and looked at the body under a microscope. You can see if they die from COVID or not. On the other hand, the authors explain, you can look at the big picture, the metadata, meaning look at that all cause mortality, which basically means that the scientists remove the reasons for the deaths and look at death itself as a measure. Did more people die in this period of time? Then it's easy to tell if our approach to solving a pandemic worked on a population level or it didn't. So the best way to measure what happened during the pandemic is to look at all cause mortality. And these scientists were also interested in how the data turned out during another event, specifically during the rollout of COVID 19 vaccines. You see, their initial research showed some shocking correlations. Between vaccine rollout and people dying, but some people argued that it might be just a seasonal effect example, the vaccines were rolled out in some countries in January February, and that coincides with the flu season. So this time, the scientists looked at a much larger subset of data and measured what happened in the countries that had vaccines rolled out in different seasons, even during summer, which is way outside the flu season. So let's look at the report. First, they found that in all countries that were included in their analysis, all cause mortality increased Every time the COVID 19 vaccines were deployed. 2nd, 9 out of the 17 countries had no detectable excess death right after the March 11 2020 event. That's when the World Health Organization declared the pandemic, and these countries didn't have access up until the COVID 19 vaccination campaign began. 3rd, unprecedented peaks in all cause mortality were observed in January February 2022. This coincided with or followed the rollout of boosters in 15 of the 17 countries studied. And while it was winter in North America, in those months, it was summer in most of the South America. So the flu season was not a factor there at all. 4. Excess all cause mortality during the vaccination period beginning January 2021 was 1,740,000 deaths across all ages and countries. That makes up one death for every 800 injections. And 5, the vaccine dose fatality rate increased exponentially with age. Reaching almost 5% among those 90 years older who received a 4th vaccine dose, which translates to 1 in 20 deaths from COVID vaccines among the elderly. Dennis Randcourt, one of the authors of the study told the epoch Times in an email that, quote, there is no evidence In a hard data of all cause mortality of a beneficial effect from the COVID 19 vaccine rollouts. No lives were saved. Researchers also looked for a counter example. Maybe there were places that showed that COVID 19 vaccines improved the all cause mortality. But they could not find a single country with such trends. According to the report, data from numerous countries such as India, Australia, Canada, Israel, and the United States show a similar phenomena. The peaks in all cause mortality coincide with booster rollouts every time. In the United States, specifically, deaths were prominent in the 25 to 64 age group in 20 one States. Coinciding with a rapid surge in vaccines given during the vaccine equity campaigns launched by regulatory agencies. Researchers estimated that United States had about 160,000 excess deaths in that age group during a period where over 60,000,000 COVID 19 vaccine doses were given out. So if your friend or family member is thinking about or being pressured into getting a COVID 19 vaccine, Please share this report with them so that they can make an informed decision. This is One Line Health. I'm Dan Skorback. Stay healthy America.
Saved - October 11, 2023 at 4:25 AM

@JesslovesMJK - Jessica Rose 🤙

Vaccine dose fatality rate per injection. Your risk of dying doubles between dose 3 and 4 for Chile and Peru. "The doubling time is about 4 years in age - you will double your risk of dying per injection." Dose 4 shows the highest risk. @denisrancourt

Saved - October 11, 2023 at 7:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
COVID-19 vaccines lack scientific evidence of saving lives and have caused numerous deaths and injuries. Serious adverse events occur in 1 in 800 to 1 in 5000 cases. Germany alone reported 254 vaccine-related deaths. All-cause mortality remained high or increased in 2021/2022, challenging vaccine safety claims. VAERS data shows a significant increase in deaths post-vaccination. Efficacy studies failed to show statistical significance in reducing COVID-19 deaths or all-cause mortality. Correlation between high vaccination rates and low mortality existed pre-vaccine rollout. Excess mortality increased even after high vaccination rates. Not all countries experience mass deaths among the unvaccinated. The UK's all-cause data reveals no significant advantage for the vaccinated. Excess deaths correlate with poverty levels and lockdowns. COVID-19 deaths may be inflated due to coding practices and death certificate modeling. Wastewater surveillance and PCR tests lack validation.

@USMortality - Ben

There is no scientific high quality evidence that the COVID-19 vaccines have saved any lives. On the contrary, they have demonstrably caused many deaths, much more than any other Pharma product in history, and also caused many - often permanent - injuries. Here’s the evidence: VACCINE Safety: - Serious Adverse Events (SAE) are estimated to be in a range of 1 in 800 to 1 in 5000: - https://bmj.com/content/378/bmj.o1731/rr-0 - https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X22010283 - https://twitter.com/hugh_mankind/status/1590733326553600003 - https://twitter.com/JulikaBrand/status/1550013097917747201 - COVID-19 vaccines have caused at least 254 confirmed deaths in Germany, as confirmed by the official death statistics of the federal statistics office: https://usmortality.substack.com/p/german-government-confirms-254-vaccine - No one knows how all-cause mortality would’ve looked like without vaccine, but the fact that mortality stayed high or increased in 2021/2022 is evidence that at least one of the words of ‘safe & effective’ cannot be true: - https://twitter.com/profnfenton/status/1596948154339196930 - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1701930193101721613 - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1592549814344241152 - VAERS shows a never-seen-before hockey stick increase with the introduction of the vaccines, that has not been explained by the health authorities. European data shows the same. - https://twitter.com/P_McCulloughMD/status/1712156115587223750 - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1407009199020658689 - https://twitter.com/JesslovesMJK/status/1707703130547540320 - VAERS shows that most death reports occur in the first 14 days. This is why people who died within two weeks of vaccination were likely considered unvaccinated. - https://twitter.com/goddeketal/status/1682008709067681792 - Young & Healthy: US data shows, that mortality rates increased after the vaccine rollout in all age groups 0-9, 10-19, 20-29: - https://mortality.watch/explorer/?c=USA&t=cmr&ct=yearly&ag=0-9&ag=10-19&ag=20-29&v=2… Efficacy: - None of the RCT Studies, except the Johnson & Johnson, showed a statistical significant effect on all-cause mortality. The mRNA vaccines has each +1 death in the vaccinated group. Novavax yielded +4 in the vaccinated group. Why J&J produced much fewer deaths, is a mystery as AstraZeneca, that used the same approach, had equal deaths in both groups. Also, the non-covid deaths are not balanced in the JJ trial results, pointing towards evidence of incorrect randomization of participants. - https://twitter.com/TracyBethHoeg/status/1512105790441607168 - Summary of the six authorized COVID-19 vaccines in US and EU. None of them were able to show statistical significance in regard to COVID-19 deaths or all-cause mortality (except JJ, as explained above) - not even in combination with 175 thousand test subjects. - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1577776630818283542 - Correlation DOES NOT EQUAL Causation: The Correlation between High Vaccinated and Low Mortality Countries, that the ‘Real Truther’ is describing, existed already before the vaccine rollout. If we look at before/after, no stat. Significant effect can be observed. - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1664118356725874690 - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1664043455801327616 - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1532100552535965697 - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1551149126364106754 - Higher unvaxed charts, are typically either confounded by general health status or manipulated via 14 day unvaccinated trick, lumping unknown vaccine status into the categories. My request to make the raw data public was denied, guess why? https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1579474197503700999 - There are many examples of jurisdictions, where excess mortality exploded, after the vast majority of the population was vaccinated: - https://x.com/USMortality/status/1689356018105688064 - Not remotely possible that the vaccines have saved many lives! Excess mortality in seniors has increased by another +112% after more than 80% had already been vaccinated: - https://x.com/USMortality/status/1709011271071527057?s=20… - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1464985828904554496 - There are many countries that do not have any stat. Significant excess deaths, namely Luxembourg in southern Italy, so how do you explain that no unvaccinated are dying en-masse there either? - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1703492850137075764 - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1709039967555707013 - There’s no stat. signifificant advantage visible when comparing the UK all-cause data by vaccination status. Often, the unvaccinated have even lower mortality rates: - https://twitter.com/TheRustler83/status/1708969809583501695 - Dr. Rancourt discovered, that excess deaths are mostly correlated with poverty levels, and the poorest suffer the most from the lockdowns, but likely also from vaccinations: - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1667403684798668800 COVID-19 correlation - There's a simple explanation as to why COVID-19 deaths typically track with excess deaths - but only in western/wealthy countries! Most western countries have incentivized coding seasonal respiratory illnesses as COVID-19 & also apply their own death certificate modeling on top of that, such as what CDC does with the NVSS/MMDS! - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1709325123910869088 - Wastewater surveillance cannot be used to establish the claim, that Covid-19 was novel or to assess levels of virus, because genetic material from multiple strains and persons are mixed or pooled together, and no data from before 2020 (as control of the method) is available. - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1709645502659330151 - The COVID-19 PCR test has never been clinically validated! In contrast, most people that tested positive in hospitals were incidentals, i.e. test positive, but actually are not sick with a respiratory illness, such as COVID-19: - https://twitter.com/FLSurgeonGen/status/1707115008927166706

Saved - November 23, 2025 at 9:31 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m seeing a flood of posts claiming COVID-19 vaccines cause turbo cancers, immune damage, and sudden deaths, with doctors warning, data analyses, and alarming anecdotes from around the world. The message is urgent: vaccines are said to trigger aggressive cancers and long-term immune harm, demanding action and further research.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

#CANCER+#VAIDS+#AUTOIMMUNE+#REEMERGING #LATENT #DISEASE: https://tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=Covid%20World%202022-09-17:%20Mass%20Vaccination%20Deaths,%20Damages,%20Data,%20Causal%20Links,%20Sacrificed%20...&relationship=All&drsid=0&pisid=0&tiname_dno=1&page=1#bc-ledxNKvLUGeG #Depopulation #eugenics #AdverseEffects #vaccine #PureBlood #SoylentGreen #bioweapons #ExcessDeaths #genocide #extermination #culling #Nuremberg2.0 #vaccinegenocide #vaccineholocaust #TrueTimes

covid world 2022-09-17: mass vaccination deaths, damages, data, causal links, sacrificed ... @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 covid world 2022-09-17: mass vaccination deaths, damages, data, causal links, sacrificed ... @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 tumia.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@MakisMedicine - William Makis (McGill Medicine)

VIDEO: Dr.Drew show @DrKellyVictory TURBO CANCER - Pfizer & Moderna COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine cancers in mandated young workers 2023 is WORST year yet: Lymphoma, leukemia, glioblastoma, breast, colon, lung, testicular, ovarian, sarcoma @twc_health @ABDanielleSmith #cdnpoli #ableg

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Let's start with I had predicted, unfortunately, and I hate that I am right. I predicted before the vaccines were ever launched to the public that they would have a profound impact on the immune system. And as a result of that alone, would likely cause increased cancer rates just because of their immunological impact. So let's start, if you would, just by talking a little bit about what you are seeing in the data, in the numbers with regard to cancers, what kinds of cancers, those sorts of things. And then maybe we'll get into the weeds, you and I, about perhaps some of the pathology of that, why that might be, some theories for why we're seeing these numbers. Speaker 1: You know, Doctor. Kelly, I've been tracking these turbo cancers as they're being called, these very aggressive cancers that are showing up in young COVID vaccinated people. The youngest case I've reported is a 12 year old boy who had a Moderna vaccine and came down with, end stage brain cancer that killed him in less than a year. I'm seeing it in teenagers in university and college students who are mandated to take COVID vaccines. People in their twenties, thirties, forties, fifties are coming down with stage four cancers. These cancers are presenting at a late stage, stage three, but usually stage four. These are lymphomas, leukemias, these are breast cancers, colon cancers, lung cancers, hepatobiliary cancers, testicular cancers in young men, ovarian cancers in women, kidney cancers, renal cell cancers, melanomas, skin cancers, and sarcomas as well. So these are the types of cancers that are showing up in a younger cohort than oncologists expect. They're showing up at a late stage. The tumors can grow very large. So some of these tumors are described as football sized, even watermelon sized, you know, these are ten, fifteen centimeter tumors, and they're very aggressive and and they really they spread very rapidly. Even when the surgeons are trying to get at them, trying to surgically excise them so that they could control the tumor, what they usually find after surgery is that the tumor has already spread. It's already spread to the lymph nodes, it's already spread to the lungs or the bones, very aggressive cancers, and really related to the COVID-nineteen vaccine specifically, and mRNA vaccines, the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. Speaker 0: One of the things, me just step back for a second, because one of the things that might not be known to our audience is that all cancers are not created equal with regard to the population that they hit. You know, for example, we not uncommonly and tragically see certain blood cancers in children leukemias, for example. It wouldn't be uncommon, to to see a brain tumor, brain cancers sometimes in young children. It would be extraordinarily uncommon to see a colon cancer in somebody before the fourth or fifth decade. Very uncommon to see a lung cancer before the fourth or fifth decade. Those sorts of things, extremely uncommon to see. So some of these cancers that we are seeing, and I think you're getting at that, things like these colon cancers, we are now seeing colon cancers in people in their late teens, twenties, and thirties. And again, as you said, very aggressive colon cancers. So it's not just that cancers per se, but it's seeing cancers in in groups of people in whom they'd never seen before. So let's in terms of just to put some magnitude on it. In terms of give us some sense of the magnitude versus what we would have considered to be the baseline numbers. Speaker 1: You know, it's very hard to get a sense of this because it's almost impossible to get good cancer data from from the governments. Know, Ed Dowd has talked about this, the difficulty of getting good data. You know, I've tried to get cancer data here in Canada from Statistics Canada, from the Canadian Cancer Society, and they are not reporting any data from 2021 or 2022. It seems they're holding this data back. And so I'm left with anecdotal evidence. When Ed Dowd, you know, he'll report from US insurance data that disability rates, in the working population, let's say, eighteen to sixty four, who abided by the COVID vaccine mandates, disability rates are 500% higher compared to the working population who dropped out of the workforce and didn't want to get the vaccines. Well, a big portion of those disabilities are these cancers, are these cancer diagnoses. And so, you know, I'm seeing an explosion of these cancers. I'm seeing it in doctors. I'm seeing it in nurses. I'm seeing it in other vaccine mandated professions. So all types of healthcare workers, I'm seeing it in teachers, I'm seeing it in police officers, firefighters, the military. You know, you see it in flight attendants, for example, you know, you had these airlines that wanted to have 100% vaccinated workforce. So really anywhere where there were very strict COVID vaccine mandates, that's where I'm seeing these explosions of these very aggressive cancers. And I can tell you, this year, '23, seems to be much worse. There's many more cases of these turbo cancers than in 2022 or 2021. The trend is upwards. The numbers are on the rise. You can see this on websites like GoFundMe. If you go on GoFundMe and you put stage four cancer and you can pick whatever cancer you want, you could put, you know, breast cancer, you could put lung cancer, colon cancer. Not only are you seeing the shocking ages, young ages of these individuals who are reporting their cancers and their fundraising because, you know, they lose their jobs when they're undergoing chemotherapy, for example, by you see just how many people are suffering are coming down from these cancers, especially in 2023. It's just unbelievable. It's a tsunami of cancer diagnosis.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's start with I had predicted, unfortunately, and I hate that I am right. I predicted before the vaccines were ever launched to the public that they would have a profound impact on the immune system. And as a result of that alone, would likely cause increased cancer rates just because of their immunological impact. So let's start, if you would, just by talking a little bit about what you are seeing in the data, in the numbers with regard to cancers, what kinds of cancers, those sorts of things. And then maybe we'll get into the weeds, you and I, about perhaps some of the pathology of that, why that might be, some theories for why we're seeing these numbers. Speaker 1: You know, Doctor. Kelly, I've been tracking these turbo cancers as they're being called, these very aggressive cancers that are showing up in young COVID vaccinated people. The youngest case I've reported is a 12 year old boy who had a Moderna vaccine and came down with, end stage brain cancer that killed him in less than a year. I'm seeing it in teenagers in university and college students who are mandated to take COVID vaccines. People in their twenties, thirties, forties, fifties are coming down with stage four cancers. These cancers are presenting at a late stage, stage three, but usually stage four. These are lymphomas, leukemias, these are breast cancers, colon cancers, lung cancers, hepatobiliary cancers, testicular cancers in young men, ovarian cancers in women, kidney cancers, renal cell cancers, melanomas, skin cancers, and sarcomas as well. So these are the types of cancers that are showing up in a younger cohort than oncologists expect. They're showing up at a late stage. The tumors can grow very large. So some of these tumors are described as football sized, even watermelon sized, you know, these are ten, fifteen centimeter tumors, and they're very aggressive and and they really they spread very rapidly. Even when the surgeons are trying to get at them, trying to surgically excise them so that they could control the tumor, what they usually find after surgery is that the tumor has already spread. It's already spread to the lymph nodes, it's already spread to the lungs or the bones, very aggressive cancers, and really related to the COVID-nineteen vaccine specifically, and mRNA vaccines, the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. Speaker 0: One of the things, me just step back for a second, because one of the things that might not be known to our audience is that all cancers are not created equal with regard to the population that they hit. You know, for example, we not uncommonly and tragically see certain blood cancers in children leukemias, for example. It wouldn't be uncommon, to to see a brain tumor, brain cancers sometimes in young children. It would be extraordinarily uncommon to see a colon cancer in somebody before the fourth or fifth decade. Very uncommon to see a lung cancer before the fourth or fifth decade. Those sorts of things, extremely uncommon to see. So some of these cancers that we are seeing, and I think you're getting at that, things like these colon cancers, we are now seeing colon cancers in people in their late teens, twenties, and thirties. And again, as you said, very aggressive colon cancers. So it's not just that cancers per se, but it's seeing cancers in in groups of people in whom they've I'd never seen a colon cancer in somebody under the age of 45 in my life until these COVID vaccines. So let's in terms of just to put some magnitude on it. In terms of give us some sense of the magnitude versus what we would have considered to be the baseline numbers for cancer rates. Speaker 1: You know, it's very hard to get a sense of this because it's almost impossible to get good cancer data from from the governments. Know, Ed Dowd has talked about this, the difficulty of getting good data. You know, I've tried to get cancer data here in Canada from Statistics Canada, from the Canadian Cancer Society, and they are not reporting any data from 2021 or 2022. It seems they're holding this data back. And so I'm left with anecdotal evidence. When Ed Dowd, you know, he'll report from US insurance data that disability rates, in the working population, let's say, eighteen to sixty four, who abided by the COVID vaccine mandates, disability rates are 500% higher compared to the working population who dropped out of the workforce and didn't want to get the vaccines. Well, a big portion of those disabilities are these cancers, are these cancer diagnoses. And so, you know, I'm seeing an explosion of these cancers. I'm seeing it in doctors. I'm seeing it in nurses. I'm seeing it in other vaccine mandated professions. So all types of healthcare workers, I'm seeing it in teachers, I'm seeing it in police officers, firefighters, the military. You know, you see it in flight attendants, for example, you know, you had these airlines that wanted to have 100% vaccinated workforce. So really anywhere where there were very strict COVID vaccine mandates, that's where I'm seeing these explosions of these very aggressive cancers. And I can tell you, this year, '23, seems to be much worse. There's many more cases of these turbo cancers than in 2022 or 2021. The trend is upwards. The numbers are on the rise. You can see this on websites like GoFundMe. If you go on GoFundMe and you put stage four cancer and you can pick whatever cancer you want, you could put, you know, breast cancer, you could put lung cancer, colon cancer. Not only are you seeing the shocking ages, young ages of these individuals who are reporting their cancers and their fundraising because, you know, they lose their jobs when they're undergoing chemotherapy, for example, by you see just how many people are suffering are coming down from these cancers, especially in 2023. It's just unbelievable. It's a tsunami of cancer diagnosis.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@tiger5037 - Victoria C Teuton

Cancer after vaccines with Professor Dalgleish https://youtu.be/PnJ5T1Enwq4?si=w42IP1JDsKYu8BaO via @YouTube

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Social Media List for Vaids+Cancer+Reemerging Dormant and Immune Disease

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Vaids+Cancer+Reemerging Dormant and Immune Disease on Mewe https://mewe.com/group/6541f5f0f470f46e45ff1ec3

MeWe: The best chat & group app with privacy you trust. Brilliant features with no BS. No Ads. No Spyware. MeWe is the Next-Gen Social Network. mewe.com

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@FreeWCH - World Council for Health (WCH)

#PlasmidGate: Prof Sucharit Bhakdi Issues Warning to Physicians Promoting Covid-19 Vaccines as Being "Safe & Effective" "Fellow citizens and physicians of the world, turn away from the perpetrators of this monstrous crime against humanity." Full video: https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/multimedia/sucharit-bhakdi-rna-vaccines/

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asserts that packaged DNA fragments have been found en masse as vaccine contaminants. Once they reach the nucleus, short DNA sequences have an increased propensity to insert into chromosomal DNA. The possible consequences are unending, including disruption of the exquisitely tuned network that controls cell division and differentiation, which can lead to cancer and developmental defects. Mutations in sperm and fertilized egg cells could render altered traits inheritable. Speaker 0 further states that cost effective procedures to reliably separate mass produced RNA from plasmids do not exist, and therefore contamination of RNA vaccines with plasmid DNA must be expected to be the rule and not the exception. Whoever propagates RNA vaccines as being safe and effective, whoever claims that nothing can happen to your genome is either incredibly ignorant or endlessly evil. That person is turning his back on the horror scenario that is unfolding in front of our very eyes. Fellow citizens and physicians of the world are urged to turn away from the perpetrators of this monstrous crime against humanity. Speaker 0 concludes with admonitions to do this to save yourself, your descendants, and to rescue the name of your family or go down in history as one of the greatest criminals of all time. Speaker 1 responds: Thank you very much, professor Bhakti. You continue to be an inspiration both scientifically and ethically for all of us.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Packaged DNA fragments have been found en masse as vaccine contaminants. Once they reach the nucleus, short DNA sequences have an increased propensity to insert into chromosomal DNA. The possible consequences are unending. Disruption of the exquisitely tuned network that controls cell division and differentiation can lead to cancer and to developmental defects. Mutations in sperm and fertilized egg cells could render altered traits inheritable. Cost effective procedures to reliably separate mass produced RNA from plasmids do not exist. Contamination of RNA vaccines with plasmid DNA must therefore be expected to be the rule and not the exception. Whoever propagates RNA vaccines as being safe and effective, whoever claims that nothing can happen to your genome is either incredibly ignorant or endlessly evil. That person is turning his back on the horror scenario that is unfolding in front of our very eyes, Fellow citizens and physicians of the world, turn away from the perpetrators of this monstrous crime against humanity. Do this to save yourself, your descendants. Do this to rescue the name of your family or go down in history as one of the greatest criminals of all time. Speaker 1: Thank you very much, professor Bhakti. You continue to be an inspiration both scientifically and ethically for all of us.
Prof Sucharit Bhakdi: The Eternal Dangers of RNA Vaccines — "A Monstrous Crime Against Humanity" Prof Sucharit Bhakdi's presentation framed the issue of DNA-contaminated RNA vaccines as a "monstrous crime against humanity." worldcouncilforhealth.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@MakisMedicine - William Makis (McGill Medicine)

NEW ARTICLE: TURBO CANCER - MELANOMA - ages 22 to 35 - COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Turbo Cancer Melanomas are resistant to all new treatments - 20 shocking cases Melanoma is skyrocketing. UK Government Disability data shows a 72% rise in disability due to skin cancer in 2022 COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Induced Turbo Cancer Melanoma is DIFFERENT. It is extremely aggressive. It doesn't respond to Radiotherapy. It doesn't respond to cutting edge Immunotherapy (which is designed to improve long term outcomes) It's killing MEN and WOMEN in their 20s and 30s Nov.10, 2023 - Coal City, IL - 35 year old Chris Hardin was diagnosed with Stage 3 Melanoma in June 2023 that rapidly progressed to Stage 4, didn’t respond to radiation or immunotherapy and became Stage 4 with tumor “growing on his spine, pressing on the vertebrae and crushing it while also wrapping around nerves” Nov.1, 2023 - 33 year old Etai David Gamliel was diagnosed with Metastatic Melanoma in late June 2023. It did not respond to radiation or immunotherapy. Cancer spread to spinal cord, taking away his ability to walk, then further up his spine until it took away his ability to breathe. Oct.25, 2023 - Brazil, IN - 28 year old Wesley Miller was going to have some cysts removed from his arm and abdomen. Instead, he was diagnosed with Stage 4 Melanoma with lesions in the brain, lungs, liver and bones. Oct.8, 2023 - Long Beach, CA - 32 year old Randi Young was diagnosed with Stage 4 melanoma Sep.21, 2023. She died 2 weeks later on Oct.8, 2023. Diagnosis to death: 2 weeks. July 6, 2023 - Germany - 23 year old German handball world champion Liv Suchting was diagnosed with brain tumors which turned out to be Stage 4 Melanoma. I present 20 such cases. First research papers are now starting to mention “Turbo Cancer” (more on that in future articles) The 5 most common COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Turbo Cancers are: lymphoma, brain (glioblastoma), breast (usually triple negative), colon and lung. Rounding out the top 10 Turbo Cancers would include: leukemias, melanomas, sarcomas, testicular and renal cell. Special mention to hepatobiliary cancers (liver, gallbladder, pancreas), ovarian and cervical. We need urgent research in this area as patients are not offered anything by their Oncologists. End stage Turbo Cancer Melanoma patients should be offered: High Dose Ivermectin protocols High Dose Fenbendazole or Mebendazole protocols High Dose Melatonin protocols Supported by peer-reviewed research. Article link in photo to avoid shadowban, just re-type the URL into your browser @twc_health @ABDanielleSmith #DiedSuddenly #cdnpoli #ableg

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@chrisenfran - de wulf christian

Spectaculaire stijging aantal KINDEREN dat dit kankermedicijn gebruikt. “Wie zo’n signaal negeert, schendt mensenrechtenverdragen,” dat er twee Kamerleden zijn die hier consequent aandacht voor vragen: Pepijn van Houwelingen (FVD) en Wybren van Haga. https://www.ninefornews.nl/spectaculaire-stijging-aantal-kinderen-dat-dit-kankermedicijn-gebruikt/

Spectaculaire stijging aantal KINDEREN dat dit kankermedicijn gebruikt “Wie zo’n signaal negeert, schendt mensenrechtenverdragen.” ninefornews.nl

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@robinmonotti - Robin Monotti

Angus Dalgleish: Professor of Oncology at St George's Hospital Medical School, London: "At the end of last year I reported that I was seeing melanoma patients who had been stable for years relapse after their first booster (their third injection). I was told it was merely a coincidence and to keep quiet about it, but it became impossible to do so. The number of my patients affected has been rising ever since. I saw two more cases of cancer relapse post booster vaccination in my patients just this last week. Other oncologists have contacted me from all over the world including from Australia and the US. The consensus is that it is no longer confined to melanoma but that increased incidence of lymphomas, leukaemias and kidney cancers is being seen after booster injections. Additionally my colorectal cancer colleagues report an epidemic of explosive cancers (those presenting with multiple metastatic spread in the liver and elsewhere). All these cancers are occurring (with very few exceptions) in patients who have been forced to have a Covid booster whether they were keen or not, for many so they could travel.  So why are these cancers occurring?  T cell suppression was my first likely explanation given that immunotherapy is so effective in these cancers. However we must also now consider DNA plasmid and SV40 integration in promoting cancer development, a feature made even more concerning by reports that mRNA spike protein binds p53 and other cancer suppressor genes. It is very clear and very frightening that these vaccines have several elements to cause a perfect storm in cancer development in those patients lucky enough to have avoided heart attacks, clots, strokes, autoimmune diseases and other common adverse reactions to the Covid vaccines. To advise booster vaccines, as is the current case, is no more and no less than medical incompetence; to continue to do so with the above information is medical negligence which can carry a custodial sentence. No ifs or buts any longer. All mRNA vaccines must be halted and banned now."

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@waukema - Wouter Aukema

Een ware explosie in gebruik #Schurft medicijn. Sinds 2021 > 22,000 jonge mensen van 15-24 jr Ruim 40.000 totaal. Een ieder die dit signaal negeert, schendt #mensenrechten: art 2 en 8 EVRM art 11 lid 2 Europees Sociaal Handvest art 24 Kinderverdrag 1/n

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@wolsned - Darren of Plymouth

75% of those with vaccine induced myocarditis will die in 10 years, and turbo cancers are spreading like wild fire through the vaccinated population. No one will be left unaffected, we all have people we care about who had the jab, when do we rise up?

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@ErikMagnethi - Erik Magnethi

New Report: Young People Dying of Cancer at ‘Explosive’ Rates, UK Government Data Show. Since the commencement of COVID-19 vaccines, there has been an unprecedented rise in the deaths of young people between 2021 and 2022 from rapidly metastasizing and terminal cancers, according to data from the UK’s Office for National Statistics. While we would expect that the UK government and their “health experts” who were so concerned about our health in 2020 would have conducted an urgent inquiry into the shocking data, alas no, they have remained predictably silent. An analysis of this data, however, has been conducted by former former BlackRock portfolio manager and data analyst, Ed Dowd and assembled by Carlos Alegria, one of Dowd’s partners, in his Humanity Projects. Their study of excess deaths in the U.K. and the U.S. using government and insurance industry data has shown that there has been “2 or 3 times the normal rate of cancer.” according to Dowd. Mike Capuzzo managing director of the Defender, who has interviewed Ed Dowd on the subject writes: New Report: Young People Dying of Cancer at ‘Explosive’ Rates, UK Government Data Show An analysis of U.K. government data shows an unprecedented increase in cancer deaths among 15- to 44-year-olds following the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines, according to a new report by data analyst Edward Dowd. The report has prompted renewed calls for further investigation. Teenagers and young people in their 20s, 30s and 40s in the U.K. are dying from rapidly metastasizing and terminal cancers at an unprecedented rate since mass COVID-19 vaccination began, according to a new analysis by Edward Dowd. The 45-page report by Dowd, a former Wall Street hedge fund manager and author of “‘Cause Unknown’: The Epidemic of Sudden Deaths in 2021 and 2022,” alarmed some oncologists who characterized it as a sharp reversal of decades of mortality data. Dowd based his analysis on readily available government statistics from the U.K.’s Office for National Statistics. In an interview with The Defender, Dowd said he and his research partners, who include a handful of high-level scientists, data analysts and financial experts, examined all International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, (ICD-10) codes for cause of death in the U.K. in the study period of  2010-2022 to investigate trends in malignant neoplasms (C00 to C99 codes). ICD-10 codes are the international physicians’ classification of diagnosis, symptom and procedure for claim processing set by the World Health Organization (WHO). A malignant neoplasm is a cancerous tumor. Dowd said his research team noticed a striking pattern: While almost all deaths among older people in 2021 and 2022 in Wales and England had been coded, 8% of deaths among 15- to 44-year-olds in 2021, and 30% of deaths in that age group in 2022, hadn’t yet been coded. “When you die in a hospital, you leave a trail of life and death with indications of what led to the death,” he said. “When a young person dies at the wheel of a car, walking down the street or in their sleep, there’s an investigation” that consumes time to assign the cause of death. Dowd said the missing codes are “indicative of the problem” of excess deaths among young people. But even with the caveat of missing codes, he said, the remaining 92% of coded deaths in 2021 and 70% of coded deaths in 2022 revealed “a strong signal of cancer deaths in the young. We show a large increase in mortality due to malignant neoplasms that started in 2021 and accelerated substantially in 2022. “The increase in excess deaths in 2022 is highly statistically significant (extreme event),” Dowd wrote in his report. “The results indicate that from late 2021 a novel phenomenon leading to increased malignant neoplasm deaths appears to be present in individuals aged 15 to 44 in the UK.” The study’s results in the rate of cancer deaths above the historic norm in 2022 for ages 15-44 in the U.K. included: A 28% rise in fatal breast cancer rates in women. An 80% increase in pancreatic cancer deaths among women and a 60% increase among men. A 55% increase among men in colon cancer deaths and a 41% increase in women. A 120% increase in fatal melanomas among men and a 35% increase in women. A 35% increase in brain cancer deaths among men and a 12% rise in women. A 60% increase in cancer death rates among men in cancers “without site specification” and a 55% increase among women. ‘Mounting clinical evidence’ led to study Dowd produced his report, assembled by Carlos Alegria, one of Dowd’s partners, in his Humanity Projects study of excess deaths in the U.K. and the U.S. using government and insurance industry data. He said he started his pro bono data-driven project to help guide public policy when he saw how COVID-19 pandemic policies were destroying society’s faith in institutional experts. Surveying the capture of national and state government regulatory agencies and corporate media by Big Pharma and other global interests, he realized, “We need independent agents to act as gatekeepers of the public interest.” “We intend to be such agents, and to provide high-quality research to other individuals and institutions who seek similar outcomes,” he wrote. The new report is his third in the UK Cause of Death Project, which previously examined “UK – Death and Disability Trends for Cardiovascular Diseases, Ages 15-44,” and “UK – Death Trends for the Cardiovascular System, Ages 15-44, Analysis of Individual Causes.” The mounting clinical evidence linking burgeoning cancers in young people to the COVID-19 vaccines led Dowd to his latest study, he said. “We focus our research on younger individuals, aged 15-44, as presently it is a topic of particular interest due to the rise in anecdotal evidence of many unexplained aggressive and unusual cancers (such as turbo cancers … ) occurring in the population, particularly in younger individuals,” he wrote in the study. “The focus of this study is not to examine individual claims and anecdotes, but instead to provide a statistical analysis at a population level and clarify if the anecdotal evidence is abnormal or not.” Dowd said he hopes “the relationships that we uncover in our analysis” are “a basis for a reality check for health professionals to understand underlying trends in individuals’ health.” Dowd’s method was to analyze the number of deaths attributed to cancer in England and Wales between 2010 and 2022 in the U.K. Office for National Statistics data. He compared excess death rates, the difference between observed deaths and the baseline for expected deaths, before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. He established a baseline of normal cancer death rates from 2010-2020 that was remarkably consistent with few deviations, he said — until the cancer death rates rose significantly in late 2021 in the U.K. following the vaccine rollout. Key findings from the report include: Breast cancer dominates in women. The most common cause of fatal cancer in women, ages 15-44, is breast cancer, representing about 25% of the total excess death rate caused by malignant tumors in women in 2022. The next most dangerous cancers for women, based on excess death rates, were colon cancer and cancer of the cervix uteri. While fatal cancer deaths rose dramatically among both young men and young women in 2022, young men saw a disproportionately higher rise in cancer deaths, but with no dominant cancer comparable to breast cancer in women. Brain cancer, colon cancer and stomach cancer accounted for 30.9% of the rise in fatal cancers in men in 2022. Cancers “without specification of site,” indicating rapid metastasis to other organs and commonly called “turbo cancers,” “exploded” in 2022, Dowd said. “These cancers saw very large rise in both women (in 2021 and 2022) and men (in 2022) and were likely metastasized already once they were identified. As the individuals refer to younger individuals who do not require early screening, these cancers were likely of rapid growth.” Men experienced a huge rise in skin cancer death rates of 118% in 2022. “Even though these cancers do not account for a large proportion of all cancers,” Dowd said. Cancers of the digestive tract “saw explosive changes in 2021 and 2022 relative to the 2010-2019 trend,” Dowd wrote. “Of particular notice are cancers of the colon (internationally coded as C18), stomach (C16) and esophagus (C15). “These cancers related to the digestive tract appear to have risen substantially in importance, and we also notice that they seem to be affecting men in a disproportionate manner.” Pancreatic cancer “saw a very large rise in both women (in 2022) and men (in both 2021 and 2022). Why these cancers rose so dramatically and why they rose first in men then women is one of the questions that we believe warrants investigation.” Dowd emphasized that his research was “a first attempt to bring out some patterns that are observed in trends” in cancer post-2020. “We hope that medical doctors and specialized researchers perform further investigations based upon these (and other) insights that our data analysis provides,” he wrote. Link between COVID shots and rise in cancers ‘worth looking at’ Dr. Chris Flowers, an academic physician, radiologist and breast cancer specialist in England who came out of retirement to be the volunteer scientific lead of the War Room/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Analysis Project, told The Defender the U.K. data were “very, very, concerning.” Flowers said Dowd’s research confirmed similar data on sharp cancer death increases reported by researchers, clinicians and cancer specialists in the U.S., U.K. and across the Western industrialized world since the global rollout of the experimental Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccine. An estimated more than 5.55 billion people, or about 72.3% of the global population, received the shots. Flowers said he and his colleagues, including pathologists, radiologists, oncologists, internists, critical care doctors and researchers in the U.S. and U.K., have never seen anything like the severity of fatal breast cancers and other cancers in the young that exploded in 2022. Dowd’s report confirms what Flowers and his colleagues have noticed for more than a year: “We’re seeing 2 or 3 times the normal rate of cancer.” “We’re seeing younger people, we’re talking 20- and 30-year-old women, usually after they started menstruating and some form of growth promoter is going on normally, presenting with advanced tumors which are difficult to treat, but also they may have more than one tumor,” Flowers said. “Something that was rare is now relatively common.” Perhaps most distressing, Flowers said, is the rise in the young of what some oncologists now call “turbo cancers,” a new term. “Turbo cancer is a popular name that’s been coined to describe several things,” Flowers said. “It is cancers in young people just turning up, one day you’re absolutely fine, the next day you’re told you have terminal cancer and you’re dead in a week. There are many reports of that even in the mainstream media.” “Tumors are not only faster growing but you’re getting more types of cancer occurring in the same person. It used to be very very rare. Just occasionally I’d see a very, very aggressive inflammatory cancer in young people. But now everyone has stories.” Dr. Pierre Kory, a pulmonologist and critical care doctor who is president and medical director of the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) and treats hundreds of vaccine-injured patients in his practice, said he is “being deluged with reports and consults for help” about cancer increases from colleagues and patients. David Wiseman, Ph.D., a pharmacist with a doctorate in experimental pathology and a pioneer, originally for Johnson & Johnson, of products to prevent post-surgery internal injuries, said he was alternatively astonished and outraged that governments and mainstream media won’t follow up on research he and Kevin McKernan, a former director of research and development at the MIT Human Genome Project, conducted showing the mRNA shots were contaminated with DNA fragments. These fragments, Wiseman said, add to the potential damage the vaccines could cause to the human genome and open new doors to an infinite variety of problems, including cancer. Wiseman told The Defender that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) own data show cancer concerns connected to the COVID-19 vaccines. “We’re seeing an increase in cancers in VAERS,” the official U.S. Food and Drug Administration and CDC site for reporting vaccine injuries, Wiseman said. “The CDC did a PRR analysis, a signal analysis, that found a signal for cancer in the vaccines, which isn’t proof but it means it’s worth looking at.” Source – Mike Capuzzo the managing editor of The Defender. https://expose-news.com/2023/11/29/new-report-young-people-dying-of-cancer-at-explosive-rates-uk-government-data-show/

New Report: Young People Dying of Cancer at ‘Explosive’ Rates, UK Government Data Show. - The Expose Since the commencement of COVID-19 vaccines, there has been an unprecedented rise in the deaths of young people between 2021 and 2022 from rapidly metastasizing and terminal cancers, according to data from the UK's Office for National Statistics. While we would expect that the UK government and their "health experts" who were so concerned about expose-news.com

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@MakisMedicine - William Makis (McGill Medicine)

NEW ARTICLE: mRNA in PREGNANCY - Fetuses are developing cancers. These may be FETAL TURBO CANCERS Worse yet: DNA contamination, contained within Lipid Nanoparticles (LNP), may be crossing the placenta into the fetus and integrating! Have you heard recently about fetuses developing cancer in utero? June 16, 2021 - Sadie Sheppard got her COVID shot in second Trimester and her baby developed brain cancer and died at 2 days old. “Anya rapidly developed a cancerous brain tumor in utero (suspected at 30/32 weeks) that progressed so rapidly and shifted my organs in such a dangerous way my cesarean was performed by over 30 doctors, surgeons and techs.” “I got my COVID shot in the 2nd trimester and my baby developed brain cancer. I’m not sure if there are any links and my providers have stood by the fact that there are no links. But my mind can’t help but wonder”. Her baby Anya lived 2 days and died on June 16, 2021. We are starting to see these types of horror stories. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccinated pregnant women are having babies that develop aggressive cancers while still in utero. These may be Turbo Cancers, but it is too early to draw conclusions. Nevertheless, this is extremely alarming. I will raise a very serious concern that I believe has not been raised by anyone yet: Lipid Nanoparticles (LNPs) cross the placenta (this was known before mRNA jabs were rolled out) When a pregnant woman is vaccinated with an mRNA Vaccine, the LNPs in her blood cross the placenta and deliver Pfizer or Moderna mRNA to the fetus which will then produce the toxic spike protein. @Kevin_McKernan discovered DNA Contamination in all Pfizer & Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vials, confirmed by @P_J_Buckhaults and @DJSpeicher in some of the most important sequencing work ever done. DNA Contamination is contained within Pfizer & Moderna LNPs, in addition to the mRNA DNA Contamination is therefore also crossing the placenta, potentially integrating into the genome of the developing fetus. This could lead to the initiation of an aggressive cancer in utero (Fetal Turbo Cancer) This has never been raised as a concern by anyone else. Accordingly, I am raising the alarm today. mRNA Vaccines must NOT be administered to any pregnant woman under any circumstance! Women who were injected with COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines prior to or during pregnancy MUST be monitored at all times for fetal abnormalities including and especially CANCER. Article link in photo to avoid shadowban, just re-type the URL into your browser. @Jathorpmfm @twc_health @VigilantFox @TheChiefNerd #Diedsuddenly #cdnpoli #ableg

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@robinmonotti - Robin Monotti

"There is evidence that cancers are occurring in excess after people receive COVID-19 vaccinations" - Dr. Risch: Professor Emeritus of Epidemiology in the Department of Epidemiology and Public Health at the Yale School of Public Health and Yale School of Medicine. His research has focused extensively on the causes of cancer as well as prevention and early diagnosis. Dr. Risch said patients must now wait months, not weeks, to get an appointment at an oncology clinic in New York. “What clinicians have been seeing,” said Dr. Risch, “is very strange things: For example, 25-year-olds with colon cancer, who don't have family histories of the disease—that's basically impossible along the known paradigm for how colon cancer works—and other long-latency cancers that they're seeing in very young people." He said this is not how cancer normally develops."

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@gyppomode - 🔪inky.tabali 🗡(youngest mob widow)

doctors are really incredibly stupid people apparently its a scabies outbreak in chicago rn & the authorites are pointing the finger at migrants from central america?? like there hasnt been a LONG overdue skin parasite epidemic thanks to the “you see bugs, youre on drugs” policy?

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@MakisMedicine - William Makis (McGill Medicine)

NEW ARTICLE: Dying from Influenza, pneumonia: COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines severely damage the immune system & leave mRNA victims vulnerable to infections LONG TERM Young people are dying from influenza, pneumonia, other infections. Why? mRNA destroyed their Immune Systems! 20 cases of INFECTION (influenza, pneumonia), many fatal, that should never be a problem for anyone with a normally functioning immune system, are presented in this article: Nov.21, 2023 - 38 year old news anchor Elaine da Silva was 23 weeks pregnant and was sent to hospital in Sao Paulo, Brazil on Monday Nov.20 because she was suffering from respiratory issues. She had contracted pneumonia and on Tuesday, Nov.21, she died suddenly along with her unborn child. Nov.11, 2023 - Los Angeles, CA - Jason Carmody died suddenly on Nov.11, 2023. "He'd been trying to shake what we thought was a cold, possibly pneumonia, and he collapsed while putting up early Christmas decorations". "I found him barely breathing, unable to move, he coded in the ambulance". He was COVID-19 Vaccinated. Nov.10, 2023 - North Devon, UK - 52 year old Tony Stevens was taken ill with "suspected flu" on Nov.7 and died suddenly just 3 days later on Nov.10, 2023. He leaves behind 4 children ages 8-18 Nov.2, 2023 - Wolverhampton, UK - 40 year old Terence Reilly died suddenly on Nov.2, 2023 after initially having "fallen ill with pneumonia". "Day before he passed he was laughing and looking forward to going home” Oct.10, 2023 - Mary Lou Retton, legendary US gymnast who won a gold medal in 1984 Olympics, is in an intensive care unit with rare pneumonia, unable to breathe on her own. Sep.28, 2023 - Naperville, IL - 48 year old Eric Sutherland died suddenly on Sep.28, 2023 after battling "pneumonia" for a few days. He had Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Lot ER8729, a particularly lethal batch Sep.14, 2023 - Canada - 43 year old Deryck Whibley, lead vocalist for Canadian pop-punk band “Sum41” was hospitalized with pneumonia with possibility of heart failure. Aug.22, 2023 - Brazil - 36 year old professional volleyball player Bruno Godoy died suddenly on Aug.22, 2023. He suffered two strokes and had pneumonia. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines severely damage your Immune System and the damage is LONG-LASTING - studies initially referred to this as “Negative Vaccine Efficacy", as early as Dec.2021 when Denmark researchers published govt data: 2022 Feb Sweden Study - Nordstrom et al - negative vaccine efficacy manifests in the 7-9 month range post 2nd COVID-19 vaccine dose (This Swedish study of 842,974 vaccinated individuals showed that starting at about 7 months after 2nd dose, vaccine effectiveness dropped below zero, indicating severe Immune System damage in the vaccinated) 2022 June - @CDCgov ACIP Meeting preliminary unpublished data June 14, 2022 - CDC’s own preliminary data showed that Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA vaccine had a “vaccine effectiveness” that dropped below zero as early as 3 months after the 2nd dose, bottoming out at 9 months, consistent with severe Immune System damage. 2022.Dec - Cleveland Clinic, (Shrestha et al) - Study of 51,011 employees showed that the more COVID-19 vaccine doses you took, the more likely you were to get infected with COVID-19 over time. Each additional dose damaged your immune system more. Every COVID-19 mRNA Vaccinated person must assume that they have suffered some degree of Immune system damage, the extent of which they won’t be able to determine. This leaves them vulnerable to all kinds of infections (viral, bacterial, fungal) that could be fatal for them! According to CDC’s own data, this mRNA induced Immune System Damage is LONG LASTING and only starts to recover 11-12 months after the last mRNA dose, and the recovery is only partial. We can see from Australia (NSW) Government Data (July 2022 to December 2022 when they stopped reporting it), that the double vaccinated never fully recover, although they always do better than the triple vaccinated over the LONG TERM. Those who were double vaccinated in early 2021 are still suffering Immune system injury 1.5 years later at the end of 2022, but they are doing better than the triple jabbed and significantly better than the quadruple jabbed. GRAPHS ARE IN THE ARTICLE COVID-19 mRNA Vaccinated individuals MUST proactively address their severely damaged immune systems to mitigate the risk of influenza, COVID-19, pneumonia hospitalization, ICU admission and death. High dose Vitamin D (absolutely key!) Vitamin C and NAC (must have on hand) Melatonin (stimulates T-cell production) Zinc, Quercetin, Lysine, Elderberry, Olive Leaf (these are my personal favourites, others will prefer Black Seed or Nigella Sativa, Curcumin, Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, white pine needle, Artemisia Annua) I am a big fan of Ivermectin! @PierreKory Ongoing spike protein detoxification 3 day fasting to reboot the immune system (although not if you’re already feeling sick, wait until you're recovered) This helps address the mycoplasma pneumonia currently circulating in China and the United States being referred to as a "white lung syndrome" which is also easily treated with doxycycline, or quinolones Also helps deal with whatever nonsense new COVID-19 variants that Pfizer & Moderna mRNA Vaccine sales reps and medical con artists @EricTopol and @PeterHotez are pushing these days. JN.1 Variant? Seriously? They still claim their failed mRNA vaccines work for these new variants, even though they don't work and never did. But the fraud and the propaganda show must go on... Special thanks to: @tulloch1978 @resilient333 @toobaffled @JonelessHomes @vancemurphy Article Link in photo to avoid shadowban, just re-type the URL into your browser to access. @VigilantFox @TheChiefNerd @P_McCulloughMD @twc_health #DiedSuddenly #cdnpoli #ableg

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

One in four who had Pfizer Covid jabs experienced unintended immune response. But the fault is your bodies, not the vaccine. The vaccine is perfect. It is your bodies that are defective. Stunning https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/12/06/mrna-jabs-modena-pfizer-quarter-unintended-response/

One in four who had Pfizer Covid jabs experienced unintended immune response mRNA vaccines were affected by the glitch but no adverse effects were created, Cambridge researchers say telegraph.co.uk

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@chrisenfran - de wulf christian

Gezondheidseconoom trekt aan de alarmbel over duizelingwekkende toename van het aantal mensen dat kankermedicijnen krijgt voorgeschreven. cijfers uit Zwitserland https://www.ninefornews.nl/gezondheidseconoom-trekt-aan-de-alarmbel-over-duizelingwekkende-cijfers-uit-zwitserland/

Gezondheidseconoom trekt aan de alarmbel over duizelingwekkende cijfers uit Zwitserland Wat zou deze plotselinge en extreme stijging kunnen veroorzaken? ninefornews.nl

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@MakisMedicine - William Makis (McGill Medicine)

COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Induced Vasculitis is one of many types of Immune System injuries caused by mRNA Vaccines. This one was posted on July 21, 2023. #DiedSuddenly #cdnpoli #ableg #Pfizer #Moderna

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

World 71% "Vaccinated" for #Covid => #JN1-JN.1-#ImmuneEscape+Immune Escape+#VAIDS+ #CANCER+#AUTOIMMUNE+#IMMUNEDISORDER+#REEMERGING #LATENT #DISEASE: https://tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=Covid%20World%202022-09-17:%20Mass%20Vaccination%20Deaths,%20Damages,%20Data,%20Causal%20Links,%20Sacrificed%20...&relationship=All&drsid=0&pisid=0&tiname_dno=1&page=1#bc-ledxNKvLUGeG #Depopulation #bioweapons #genocide #Nuremberg2 #vaccinegenocide #vaccineholocaust

covid world 2022-09-17: mass vaccination deaths, damages, data, causal links, sacrificed ... @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 covid world 2022-09-17: mass vaccination deaths, damages, data, causal links, sacrificed ... @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 tumia.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@mRNAdeaths - They Keep Saying Its Rare

67-year old female diagnosed with immune thrombocytopenia following #Pfizer-#mRNA vaccination. The treatment was resistant to high-dose steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, rituximab & eventually responded to a thrombopoietin-stimulating agent. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34513446/

Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura Following Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine in an Elderly Female - PubMed Mass vaccination campaigns are being run all over the globe to combat the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. There have been several reports of immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) occurrence following COVID-19 vaccination. However, ITP due to the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine has been rarely reported, and a cau … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@resilient333 - cheri maday

And...'suddenly'😪💔 *Brenda Vrancks- 47 yrs - Belgium *December 4, 2023 *"softly went away from us at home" *No Cause of Death Reported *"No flowers or wreaths, but donations to Cancer Foundation" https://www.pues.be/sites/default/files/rouwbrieven/Vranckx%20Brenda%20www.pdf

Pagina niet gevonden | Pues pues.be

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

They are finding spike proteins from the jab right in the middle of cancer cells.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Doctor Ryan Cole out of Idaho. Check him out. He's always in trouble with the big machine. They are always trying to discredit him. His most recent antics, he's been working with some doctors out of Germany, and they've been looking at the unusual cancers that are exploding right into stage four. And they're finding in very unusually young ages, as well as those who have been in remission for ten, fifteen plus years because the immune system is being degraded. And can you imagine as they put these cancer cells underneath the microscope, what they're finding? Right in the middle of those cells, they're finding the spike protein.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Doctor Ryan Cole out of Idaho. Check him out. He's always in trouble with the big machine. They are always trying to discredit him. His most recent antics, he's been working with some doctors out of Germany, and they've been looking at the unusual cancers that are exploding right into stage four. And they're finding in very unusually young ages, as well as those who have been in remission for ten, fifteen plus years because the immune system is being degraded. And can you imagine as they put these cancer cells underneath the microscope, what they're finding? Right in the middle of those cells, they're finding the spike protein.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@JonelessHomes - Covid BC

This guy developed AIDS after taking the Covid-19 vaccine. He blames Long Covid for his failing health. #LongCovid #AIDS #VaccineSideEffects #Pfizer #NHS Credit: http://VaccineInjuries.ca http://GenocideBlog.com

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes how, without makeup and studio lighting, this is what they look like, and notes that it’s hard for people to believe how long COVID has affected them. They say what they say about long COVID sounds like it can’t be that bad, insisting they never looked like this before, and that it was what long COVID did.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And without the makeup, about the, you know, studio lighting, This is what I look like, what I deal with. I know it's hard for people to believe. I know that what I say about long COVID sounds sounds like, oh, no. It can't be that bad. I never looked like this before. Ever. It was what long COVID did.
VaccineInjuries.ca VaccineInjuries.ca You can now submit vax injuries to us on telegram by sending it to @BurnerPhone3 t.me
GenocideBlog.com (@CovidBC) · Gab.com The latest Gabs from GenocideBlog.com (@CovidBC). I’m an independent researcher. I document cases of “Sudden Adult Death Syndrome” in Covid-19 vaccinated individuals. I’ve saved 20K+ cases in the past 30 months and I’m finding new ones daily. Every case will be shared here. ******************* ⚠️ Sensitive Content! ⚠️ ******************* Telegram: http://CovidBC.me (36K followers) Rumble: http://VaxGenocide.com BitChute: http://BitChute.com/VaxGenocide Gettr: http://Gettr.com/user/CovidBC Truth Social: http://TruthSocial.com/@CovidBC - The Home of Free Speech and the Parallel Economy. Join our community where people who support family, faith and free speech can speak freely and shop at businesses who share their values. gab.com

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@resilient333 - cheri maday

And...'suddenly'😪💔 *Ewa Wanat-61 yrs-Germany *Long-time editor-in-chief of the first Polish information radio TOK FM *"in the Summer she was diagnosed with Cancer, but she still didn't believe she would die" *December 13, 2023 *Ewa died battling Cancer. https://www.radioszene.de/182259/ewa-wanat.html

Journalistin Ewa Wanat (61) ist verstorben Ewa Wanat (61), die langjährige Chefredakteurin des ersten polnischen Informationsradio TOK FM, sowie Feuilletonistin für WDR Cosmo und Autorin beim Rundfunk radioszene.de

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@jathorpmfm - James Thorp MD

https://www.europeanreview.org/article/34685 DISASTER - in 2021 the synthetic mRNA from the C19 vaxxx was proven to be reverse transcribed into human liver cells in-vitro (in lab). This study now proves it occurs in-vivo (in live humans). It is just one lie after another. When I posted the In vitro study I was vigorously attached by the Soros funded “fact checkers” aka information prostitutes.

Presence of viral spike protein and vaccinal spike protein in the blood serum of patients with long-COVID syndrome OBJECTIVE: COVID-19 patients experience, in 10-20% of the cases, a prolonged long-COVID syndrome, defined as the persistence of symptoms for at least two europeanreview.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@MakisMedicine - William Makis (McGill Medicine)

Auckland, New Zealand - 19 year old Poppy Beguely started coughing up blood and experiencing terrible hangovers in April 2022 She was diagnosed with Stage 3 Hodgkin Lymphoma & a 6cm tumor in her chest COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Turbo Cancer Lymphoma? #DiedSuddenly #cdnpoli #ableg

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@MakisMedicine - William Makis (McGill Medicine)

French Journalist 31 year old Clementine Vergnaud died on Dec.23, 2023 after a 1.5 year battle with bile duct cancer. Typical age for this cancer is 70 years old. Unless you had COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines 30 (mRNA+) is the new 70 #DiedSuddenly #cdnpoli #ableg #Pfizer #Moderna

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@jathorpmfm - James Thorp MD

13+ billion death ☠️ clot shots in 5.3 billion worldwide citizens resulting in global herd shot associated acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Get used to more bizarre previously rare infections. Thanks Pfizer

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@USMortality - Ben

Cancers are rising in the US

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@resilient333 - cheri maday

And...'suddenly'😪💔 *Michael Salonen - 39 yrs - Canada *"An autism diagnosis would not stop him from enjoying life." *December 16, 2023 *Michael passed away after a battle with Pneumonia and Brain Cancer. https://necrocanada.com/obituaries-2023/canada-alberta-edmonton-michael-salonen-october-3-1984december-16-2023/

Michael Salonen October 3 1984 December 16 2023, death notice, Canada Obituary, Browse the obituary of Michael Salonen October 3 1984 December 16 2023 residing in Edmonton, Alberta for funeral burial details. Write a message of sympathy or a last tribute necrocanada.com

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@chrisenfran - de wulf christian

‘Eigenlijk is het heel cynisch’: Pfizer veroorzaakt dit met zijn prik en heeft daar ook de oplossing voor. Wat heeft Pfizer gedaan? In maart heeft de vaccinmaker Seagen overgenomen voor 43 miljard dollar. Dat is een bedrijf dat kankermedicijnen produceert https://www.ninefornews.nl/eigenlijk-is-het-heel-cynisch-pfizer-veroorzaakt-dit-met-zijn-prik-en-heeft-daar-ook-de-oplossing-voor/

'Eigenlijk is het heel cynisch': Pfizer veroorzaakt dit met zijn prik en heeft daar ook de oplossing voor Pfizer heeft een nieuw businessmodel. De prikjes lopen niet meer zo goed. ninefornews.nl

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/eYDyBNl6Up

@angelanashtn - Nashville Angela

Chalk another one up for Pfizer. My friend (nurse) has been moved to hospice. At the end of November she wasn’t feeling well & couldn’t keep anything down. After several hospital & ER trips it was discovered that she had cancer. It started in her appendix & spread into the abdominal cavity. Her body is too weak for chemo. I’m currently waiting on a copy of the vaccination card with lot numbers. She took the shots because she was given an ultimatum to take them or she wouldn’t see her grandchild. Now she won’t be seeing any of us. 💔

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/dgKO40lubi

@unhealthytruth - Erin Elizabeth Health Nut News🥜

Famous surfer dies suddenly. Reportedly he was fully vaccinated. Allegedly he had been treated for blood cancer but reports say they don’t know if this contributed to his sudden death. He was headed to go surf when he collapsed. Rest in peace. #diedsuddenly not unjabbed https://t.co/l4kz7u6PA8

Saved - November 21, 2023 at 7:56 PM

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

83.9% of eligible individuals aged 65 and over in England got booster 2. Yet 94% percent died. That means the COVID vaccine made them MORE likely to die. Please keep this quiet. I don't want to create vaccine hesitancy!! https://expose-news.com/2023/11/19/4x-vaccinated-account-94-percent-covid-deaths-past-year/#comments

94% of COVID-19 Deaths over past year were among Quadruple Vaccinated The Office for National Statistics recently published an update on deaths by vaccination status in England and it has shockingly revealed that the vaccinated population accounted for 95% of COVID-19 deaths in the 12 months between 1st June 2022 and 31st May 2023, and 94% of those deaths were among either the triple or quadruple… expose-news.com
Saved - November 23, 2023 at 8:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a recent Skype call, I informed CDC's Ben Haynes about record-level data proving COVID vaccine-related deaths. I offered the CDC a chance to authenticate the data. If ignored, Ben might face future legal consequences. The UK ONS data also highlights increased mortality among vaccinated individuals. I emailed Ben, but CDC blocks my emails. You can remind him at media@cdc.gov. Ben's response to seeing the data was a firm "No." Safety concerns persist.

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

This is an official record of my Skype call to CDC Director of Media relations Ben Haynes notifying him that I have record-level data proving that the COVID vaccines are killing people. I offered the CDC the opportunity to view and authenticate the data.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Steve Kirsch calls Ben Haynes, the Director of Media Relations for the CDC, to inform him that he possesses record-level data on COVID-19 vaccinations and deaths, which has never been available to the CDC before. Kirsch offers to provide this data to the CDC for independent analysis to determine vaccine safety. He emphasizes that the data can be authenticated and that it shows a concerning increase in mortality rates after vaccination. Kirsch urges Haynes to take this offer seriously, as ignoring it would be a dereliction of duty and could cost lives. He provides his contact information and offers assistance in analyzing and authenticating the data.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi. It's Steve Kirsch and I'm about to call Ben Haynes. He's the Director of Media Relations for the CDC. So let's give Ben a call and, let him know that he's in got a problem. Alright. And we'll get a few ringtones and then we'll hear the official, Ben's official greeting at the CDC. And we'll leave him a message and just create a public record that were left him a message. Just in case there's any doubt. Okay. Should be, it says, connecting. Ben Haines. It'd be wild if he will Speaker 1: pick up. Benjamin, CDC slash IOD slash OC is currently unavailable. Please leave a message after the tone. When you have finished, please hang up or press the pound key for more options. Speaker 0: Hi, Ben. I'm recording this call. This is to notify you that I have in my possession Record level data from a government source it's millions of records. It has a single record for each vaccination that's given to a person as well as, if they died the date that they died. This information has never before been available to the CDC. I would like and you admitted that when we spoke in Atlanta at the CDC Museum. Now, you said that the CDC was never in possession of any record level data and so it's impossible for the CDC to do a proper Assessment of vaccine safety without that information. I am I am with this call and with my previous call where I did the same thing. With this call, I am offering the CDC this record level data so that the CDC make its own independent determination as to whether the CoV-two vaccines are safe or not. These records can be authenticated with the Government source of the data, it's very easy to do. And these records, I have obfuscated these records for people's protection so that there's no HIPAA violations. All of the dates have been shifted, but it's statistically, we preserve this statistical accuracy so you can still determine statistics from this. I'm offering this to the CDC on, I offered it before. I'm offering again. It's November 23rd and I'm offering this information to you so that you can analyze this and let the public know as soon as possible that The vaccines are not safe. Again, this information can be confirmed with the government source that it was obtained from And I have this information. I would like to give it to the CDC to analyze so that you can confirm that the COVID vaccines, in fact, had been killing massive numbers of people. That's what the analysis shows. It's pretty straightforward to analyze this. You just do a regular time series cohort analysis that's very standard. It's the same thing that the UK ONS did, but You have to look at it on a week by week basis and what you'll see is that the your mortality rate increases after you take the shots and it goes up for 5 or 6 months and then starts to level off and then goes back towards normal, but never really reaches the original normal, which is very troubling. I think you should see this data. I think the CDC should examine it. Because I'm a media person, I'm contacting you because you are the media relations person and I hope that you will take action on this because I believe that ignoring this offer is a dereliction of duty and it will cost lives. And if you ignore this, I think it will also cost your career as Well, you have a duty to the public to investigate this. This is legitimate data. I'm happy to authenticate it for you. You can authenticate it yourself. This is real government data. This is very serious. I have a team of data analysts in the UK and in the US that have looked at this and they all say, This is very very troubling. It shows that the vaccines are killing people. Professor Harvey Risch, Yale Epidemiologist, one of the top Epidemiologists In the United States, he has looked at this data and also agrees, you can reach out to him as well if you don't believe me. Take this very seriously Ben. I'm recording this. You need to act on this. This is important for public safety. If you fail to act on this, you will be jeopardizing lives. You know how to reach me Ben. You have my number. You can give me a call anytime 24 by 7 and I will happily give you the data for you to analyze. And I will help you to authenticate the source of the data. Thank you

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

If Ben ignores this offer, a jury might, in the future, find him guilty of criminal negligence. What would you do if you got a call like this?

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

See also this article: https://x.com/Smalling5Jerry/status/1727738873726337053?s=20

@Smalling5Jerry - Jerry Smalling

These researchers, in their own words: ‘…have found no evidence in [their] extensive research on ACM [All-deaths Cause Mortality] that Covid vaccines had any beneficial effect. If vaccines prevented transmission, infection or serious illness, then there should have been decreases in mortality following vaccine rollouts, not increases which were observed in every elderly group subject to rapid booster rollouts. And, mortality would not have increased solely when vaccines were rolled out, where no excess mortality occurred prior to vaccine rollouts, as we have documented in 9 countries across 3 continents.’ https://www.spectator.com.au/2023/11/excess-mortality-and-covid-vaccination-is-there-a-correlation/

Excess mortality and Covid vaccination: is there a correlation? | The Spectator Australia Since the introduction of Covid vaccines, the official narrative in Australia (and other parts of the world) is that these vaccines are safe, efficacious… spectator.com.au

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

The CDC shouldn't be ignoring this HUGE safety signal from the official UK ONS data published on their website. If you compare mortality for vaccinated and unvaccinated 80-year-olds, look who comes out ahead. Red means the vaccinated died at a higher rate.

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

Here's the source for that UK data: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/deathsbyvaccinationstatusengland Ben can't ignore that. It's official data, publicly available for download showing that that the vaxxed people had increased mortality over time vs. the unvaxxed who did not. This is the SAME PATTERN the record-level data I have showed.

Deaths by vaccination status, England - Office for National Statistics Age-standardised mortality rates for deaths involving coronavirus (COVID-19), non-COVID-19 deaths and all deaths by vaccination status, broken down by age group. ons.gov.uk

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

This is the email I just sent to Ben's personal gmail account notifying him of the phone message. The CDC blocks my emails, so I had to use his personal email. The email that was sent has the hyperlink inserted (this is a shot before I hit send).

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

Here's a screenshot with the Outlook timestamp on the sent message with the hyperlink. You can send Ben a reminder by emailing him at: media@cdc.gov

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

See also my earlier post about Ben: https://x.com/stkirsch/status/1727486339132870657?s=20

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

Meet Ben Haynes: Director of Media Relations for the CDC. I asked Ben if the CDC wanted to see the record level data that shows the COVID vaccines are killing people. His answer: "No." Got it. Are you feeling safer now? https://kirschsubstack.com/p/meet-ben-haynes-director-of-media?r=o7iqo&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Meet Ben Haynes: Director of Media Relations for the CDC I met Ben at CDC Headquarters in Georgia. Ben admitted to me that the CDC doesn't have record-level data for the COVID vaccines. And they don't want to see that data either. Now I know why. kirschsubstack.com
Saved - December 8, 2023 at 4:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Title: COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines and Potential Immune System Damage Recent cases have raised concerns about the potential long-term effects of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines on the immune system. Reports of individuals dying from influenza, pneumonia, and other infections have sparked discussions about the impact of mRNA vaccines on immune function. Studies have indicated that negative vaccine efficacy, or severe immune system damage, may occur several months after receiving the second dose of the vaccine. This damage can leave individuals vulnerable to various infections, some of which can be fatal. Recovery from this immune system damage is slow and partial, with some individuals still experiencing injury even after 1.5 years. To mitigate the risks, individuals are advised to proactively address their immune system health through measures such as high-dose vitamin D, vitamin C, NAC, melatonin, and other supplements. Detoxification from spike proteins and fasting to reboot the immune system are also recommended. It is important to stay informed about the latest developments and consult with healthcare professionals for personalized advice.

@MakisMD - William Makis MD

NEW ARTICLE: Dying from Influenza, pneumonia: COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines severely damage the immune system & leave mRNA victims vulnerable to infections LONG TERM Young people are dying from influenza, pneumonia, other infections. Why? mRNA destroyed their Immune Systems! 20 cases of INFECTION (influenza, pneumonia), many fatal, that should never be a problem for anyone with a normally functioning immune system, are presented in this article: Nov.21, 2023 - 38 year old news anchor Elaine da Silva was 23 weeks pregnant and was sent to hospital in Sao Paulo, Brazil on Monday Nov.20 because she was suffering from respiratory issues. She had contracted pneumonia and on Tuesday, Nov.21, she died suddenly along with her unborn child. Nov.11, 2023 - Los Angeles, CA - Jason Carmody died suddenly on Nov.11, 2023. "He'd been trying to shake what we thought was a cold, possibly pneumonia, and he collapsed while putting up early Christmas decorations". "I found him barely breathing, unable to move, he coded in the ambulance". He was COVID-19 Vaccinated. Nov.10, 2023 - North Devon, UK - 52 year old Tony Stevens was taken ill with "suspected flu" on Nov.7 and died suddenly just 3 days later on Nov.10, 2023. He leaves behind 4 children ages 8-18 Nov.2, 2023 - Wolverhampton, UK - 40 year old Terence Reilly died suddenly on Nov.2, 2023 after initially having "fallen ill with pneumonia". "Day before he passed he was laughing and looking forward to going home” Oct.10, 2023 - Mary Lou Retton, legendary US gymnast who won a gold medal in 1984 Olympics, is in an intensive care unit with rare pneumonia, unable to breathe on her own. Sep.28, 2023 - Naperville, IL - 48 year old Eric Sutherland died suddenly on Sep.28, 2023 after battling "pneumonia" for a few days. He had Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Lot ER8729, a particularly lethal batch Sep.14, 2023 - Canada - 43 year old Deryck Whibley, lead vocalist for Canadian pop-punk band “Sum41” was hospitalized with pneumonia with possibility of heart failure. Aug.22, 2023 - Brazil - 36 year old professional volleyball player Bruno Godoy died suddenly on Aug.22, 2023. He suffered two strokes and had pneumonia. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines severely damage your Immune System and the damage is LONG-LASTING - studies initially referred to this as “Negative Vaccine Efficacy", as early as Dec.2021 when Denmark researchers published govt data: 2022 Feb Sweden Study - Nordstrom et al - negative vaccine efficacy manifests in the 7-9 month range post 2nd COVID-19 vaccine dose (This Swedish study of 842,974 vaccinated individuals showed that starting at about 7 months after 2nd dose, vaccine effectiveness dropped below zero, indicating severe Immune System damage in the vaccinated) 2022 June - @CDCgov ACIP Meeting preliminary unpublished data June 14, 2022 - CDC’s own preliminary data showed that Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA vaccine had a “vaccine effectiveness” that dropped below zero as early as 3 months after the 2nd dose, bottoming out at 9 months, consistent with severe Immune System damage. 2022.Dec - Cleveland Clinic, (Shrestha et al) - Study of 51,011 employees showed that the more COVID-19 vaccine doses you took, the more likely you were to get infected with COVID-19 over time. Each additional dose damaged your immune system more. Every COVID-19 mRNA Vaccinated person must assume that they have suffered some degree of Immune system damage, the extent of which they won’t be able to determine. This leaves them vulnerable to all kinds of infections (viral, bacterial, fungal) that could be fatal for them! According to CDC’s own data, this mRNA induced Immune System Damage is LONG LASTING and only starts to recover 11-12 months after the last mRNA dose, and the recovery is only partial. We can see from Australia (NSW) Government Data (July 2022 to December 2022 when they stopped reporting it), that the double vaccinated never fully recover, although they always do better than the triple vaccinated over the LONG TERM. Those who were double vaccinated in early 2021 are still suffering Immune system injury 1.5 years later at the end of 2022, but they are doing better than the triple jabbed and significantly better than the quadruple jabbed. GRAPHS ARE IN THE ARTICLE COVID-19 mRNA Vaccinated individuals MUST proactively address their severely damaged immune systems to mitigate the risk of influenza, COVID-19, pneumonia hospitalization, ICU admission and death. High dose Vitamin D (absolutely key!) Vitamin C and NAC (must have on hand) Melatonin (stimulates T-cell production) Zinc, Quercetin, Lysine, Elderberry, Olive Leaf (these are my personal favourites, others will prefer Black Seed or Nigella Sativa, Curcumin, Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, white pine needle, Artemisia Annua) I am a big fan of Ivermectin! @PierreKory Ongoing spike protein detoxification 3 day fasting to reboot the immune system (although not if you’re already feeling sick, wait until you're recovered) This helps address the mycoplasma pneumonia currently circulating in China and the United States being referred to as a "white lung syndrome" which is also easily treated with doxycycline, or quinolones Also helps deal with whatever nonsense new COVID-19 variants that Pfizer & Moderna mRNA Vaccine sales reps and medical con artists @EricTopol and @PeterHotez are pushing these days. JN.1 Variant? Seriously? They still claim their failed mRNA vaccines work for these new variants, even though they don't work and never did. But the fraud and the propaganda show must go on... Special thanks to: @tulloch1978 @resilient333 @toobaffled @JonelessHomes @vancemurphy Article Link in photo to avoid shadowban, just re-type the URL into your browser to access. @VigilantFox @TheChiefNerd @P_McCulloughMD @twc_health #DiedSuddenly #cdnpoli #ableg

Saved - January 4, 2024 at 12:23 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The author claims that the data on vaccine effectiveness has been manipulated and hidden by authorities. They argue that the assumption that each dose of the vaccine works is flawed, as the number of hospitalizations among those with multiple doses is higher than expected. They call for transparency and criminal investigations, suggesting that the vaccines may have negative efficacy. The author also corrects a statement in a previous post regarding the justification of COVID policies in care homes and hospitals.

@dksdata - David Dickson

THERE WAS NEVER A "SAFE" or "EFFECTIVE" DOSE All the "by vaccine status data" published assumes each dose worked. I obtained a screenshot from the Alberta Hospitals Internal Health System (AHS) in October 2022. Like everywhere else, this data had been removed from public view in mid 2022. Our Premier et al knows about this and has done everything to ensure the data is buried (and manipulated) to hide the crimes of the past. All while the bodies continue to pile up in Excess Deaths. https://dksdata.com/ExcessDeaths And this is used to justify the continued deadly COVID Policies in playin Care Homes and Hospitals (behind closed doors) in Alberta and beyond. https://dksdata.com/Care#COMMUNICATIONS… Let's examine "The Fallacy of the Baseline Fallacy" argument (that NEVER held water) and how the long term damage from even one dose is obscured in the statistics. If each dose is working, the assumption is that it keeps the previous dose hospitalization numbers lower. i.e. if those with a 4th dose had not taken that additional dose, the 3rd dose hospitalizations would have gone up by MORE than 24%. As it was in October 2022, there were over 60% in hospital with 3 or more doses but only 40% of people had 3 or more doses. Ouch. If the 3rd dose worked, then surely there would need to be less than 40% in hospital - not over 60%. The definition of Fully Vaccinated was 2 doses in October 2022. So, if we move the fourth and third doses back into the 2nd dose, hospitalizations for 2 or more doses would be over 84% (if you have had 3 doses, you had 2 doses). This continues to suggest a MINUS efficacy for vaccinations. I have asked again and again for our Premier @DanielleSmith and our Health Minister(s) (@JasonCoppingAB and @AdrianaLaGrange) to give us the data, so we can confirm (what we already know). As they continue to remove and manipulate the data, we can only assume. https://dksdata.com/AlbertaDead All of this assumes each dose provides NO ADDITIONAL BENEFIT over the previous dose. To justify that additional dose, increased efficacy HAS TO BE DEMONSTRATED. i.e. if 24.44% are in hospital with 4 doses, that should be a higher number if they only had 3 doses. If not, what is the point of that additional dose? The numbers already look bad by just assuming ZERO efficacy. Now imagine trying to "sell' each dose as preventing more hospitalizations and deaths... they did "sell" this lie, and they continue to do so. As a result, we have to assume that the vaccines are providing an ABSOLUTE NEGATIVE EFFICACY, based on all available data. However, this is being masked by moving the needle with additional doses. Now add in the AEFI (not to mention the cost) and you have to ask, WHAT WERE THEY THINKING!? https://dksdata.com/ONSDATA TIME IS UP - We need criminal investigations to start immediately. The evidence is OVERWHELMING. https://avoidabledeathawareness.com

404 - PAGE NOT FOUND dksdata.com
Care Homes - Protecting them to death. We are a Canadian owned, boutique consulting company, operated company since 1995, we specialize in providing a full scope of integrated services to our clients in the Security, Legal, Government and Private sectors. dksdata.com
404 - PAGE NOT FOUND dksdata.com
404 - PAGE NOT FOUND dksdata.com
COVID 19 COVID Response Avoidable Death Awareness. dksdata.com

@dksdata - David Dickson

Correction - "And this is used to justify the continued deadly COVID Policies playing out in Care Homes and Hospitals (behind closed doors) in Alberta and beyond."

Saved - April 2, 2024 at 1:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Shocking statistics reveal over one million excess deaths among people aged 65 and over since the COVID-19 vaccine was authorized. The number of excess deaths recorded among the elderly is astounding, raising concerns about the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines. Despite being prioritized for vaccination, the over 65 age group experienced a significant increase in deaths compared to previous years. These figures challenge the notion that the vaccines were meant to reduce mortality rates.

@Censored4sure - Luther ‘Ćyrus’

Shocking statistics, quietly published by the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reveal over one million excess deaths have been recorded among people aged 65 and over ever since the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) gave Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) for the COVID-19 vaccine to be offered to the public. 🧵

@Censored4sure - Luther ‘Ćyrus’

The FDA granted Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine on December 11, 2020, making it the first COVID-19 vaccine to receive such authorization in the United States. Following that, the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine received EUA on December 18, 2020, and the Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) COVID-19 vaccine received EUA on February 27, 2021. The elderly were offered the COVID-19 vaccine first and the number of excess deaths recorded was astounding. During the first 20 weeks of 2021 150,085 excess deaths were recorded among people aged over 65’s compared to the 2015 to 2019 five-year average.

@Censored4sure - Luther ‘Ćyrus’

Then from week 21 to week 40 of 2021, an astounding 165,387 excess deaths were recorded among people aged 65 and over. This brought the total excess deaths from week 1 to week 40 of 2021 to 315,472 among those most likely to get the COVID-19 vaccine.

@Censored4sure - Luther ‘Ćyrus’

The remainder of 2021 saw 133,268 excess deaths recorded. Bringing the total excess deaths for the year among the over 65’s to 448,740.

@Censored4sure - Luther ‘Ćyrus’

This means nearly half a million more people died than expected who were aged 65 and over during a period where excess deaths were supposed to be reduced dramatically because an apparently safe and effective vaccine was being administered to stop a wave of deaths supposedly caused by a deadly pandemic. The year 2022 improved slightly, but still saw a shocking amount of excess deaths with 371,466 recorded among those aged over 65.

@Censored4sure - Luther ‘Ćyrus’

And in the year 2023, 257,415 excess deaths were recorded among those aged 65 and over, with the most recent data released by the CDC confirming 5,482 excess deaths were recorded in week 1 of 2024

@Censored4sure - Luther ‘Ćyrus’

This means that in total, 1,069,943 excess deaths were recorded among people aged over 65 from the first time they were offered the COVID-19 vaccine to week 1 of 2024. This is a shocking amount of excess deaths compared to the 2015-2019, five-year average. The COVID-19 vaccines were supposed to reduce the number of people dying, not increase it.

@Censored4sure - Luther ‘Ćyrus’

The staggering number of excess deaths reaching over one million in three years is more than enough evidence that the COVID-19 vaccines are far from safe and effective. The quietly published figures prove that they are extremely dangerous. In the USA, individuals over the age of 65 have been offered several COVID-19 vaccines under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). These vaccines were initially prioritized for older adults, among others, due to their alleged higher risk of severe illness from “COVID-19”. Over time, booster doses have also been recommended because the jabs clearly don’t work. If they did would over one million excess deaths have been recorded among those who have had more injections than any other age group? https://expose-news.com/2024/03/31/usa-1mil-excess-eaths-elderly-c19-jab/

SHOCKING: USA has recorded over 1 Million Excess Deaths among the over 65’s since the FDA “approved” the COVID-19 Vaccine Shocking statistics, quietly published by the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reveal over one million excess deaths have been recorded among people aged 65 and over ever since the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) gave Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) for the COVID-19 vaccine to be offered to the public. The FDA granted Emergency Use… expose-news.com
Saved - April 23, 2024 at 10:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Data from the U.K.'s Office for National Statistics (ONS) suggests that young people who received multiple COVID-19 shots had a higher mortality rate compared to those who skipped the shots. The analysis focused on individuals aged 18 to 39 and found that those who received four doses of the vaccine had a mortality rate 318% higher than their unvaccinated counterparts.

@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley

“Young people who received multiple COVID-19 jabs were significantly more likely to die than those who skipped the shots, according to data from the U.K.’s Office for National Statistics(ONS). The data include deaths by vaccination status from April 1, 2021, to May 31, 2023, when the COVID-19 shot campaign was in full effect. When The Exposé analyzed the data, they revealed the disturbing finding that those with the most COVID-19 shots fared the worst: “Our analysis focused on mortality rates per 100,000 person-years from January to May 2023 among residents in England aged 18 to 39, and what we found is truly shocking. “Initial observations of the data prove that individuals in this age bracket who had received four doses of a COVID-19 vaccine exhibited higher mortality rates compared to their unvaccinated counterparts.” Mortality rate 318% higher among quadruple-jabbed youth

@KLVeritas - Dr. Kat Lindley

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/multiple-covid-shots-higher-mortality-rates-cola/

Multiple COVID Shots Linked to Higher Mortality Rates in 18- to 39-Year-Olds Young people who received multiple COVID-19 jabs were significantly more likely to die than those who skipped the shots, according to data from the U.K.’s Office for National Statistics. childrenshealthdefense.org
Saved - July 3, 2024 at 1:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A recent study from Germany suggests that the Covid-19 mRNA vaccines may not have had any positive impact at the community level. In fact, the study found a correlation between the number of vaccinations administered in a state and an increase in excess mortality.

@Censored4sure - Luther ‘Ćyrus’

A bombshell new study from Germany has revealed that the Covid-19 mRNA vaccines have produced “no beneficial effects” at the community level, while finding that “the more vaccinations were administered in a federal state, the greater the increase in excess mortality.”

@Censored4sure - Luther ‘Ćyrus’

Source: https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/german-study-finds-covid-vaccine-has-no-beneficial-effects-while-massively-increasing-excess-deaths/

German Study Finds Covid Vaccine Has 'No Beneficial Effects' While Massively Increasing Excess Deaths A bombshell new study from Germany has revealed that the Covid-19 mRNA vaccines have produced "no beneficial effects" at the community level. thepeoplesvoice.tv
Saved - July 6, 2024 at 10:27 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A new study by the McCullough Foundation has found a statistically significant loss of life expectancy after two or more COVID vaccine doses. The study also suggests that booster doses are ineffective. This information is now documented in peer-reviewed literature, not a conspiracy theory.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

If you thought the COVID shots were bad enough, brace yourself—things just got worse. A new study has found a “statistically significant” loss of life expectancy after two or more doses. Specifically, the McCullough Foundation reported, “The subjects vaccinated with two doses lost 37% of life expectancy compared to the unvaccinated population during the follow-up considered.” Moreover, the study found booster doses to be “ineffective.” This is not some “conspiracy theory.” This is now documented in peer-reviewed literature.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A new study suggests that all-cause mortality is higher in COVID vaccinated individuals, even with booster doses. The study, published on Infowars, found that those vaccinated had a higher risk of death compared to the unvaccinated. The research analyzed data from Italy and calculated the loss of life expectancy per shot. The Wellness Company offers emergency kits with antibiotics and ivermectin for infections. Joe Rogan highlights the media's ignorance of the significant increase in all-cause mortality rates. Follow Vigilant Fox for more content. Subscribe to Vigilant News for updates. Thank you for watching.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Uh-oh. Another new damning study about the COVID vaccines just came out, and it looks like all cause mortality is higher in the COVID vaccinated. We have a lot to unpack here on beyond the headlines only on vigilant news. This segment is sponsored by the wellness company providing emergency kits that contain ivermectin and other antibiotics drug to your door. I'm Elijah Schaeffer. Let's start the show. Well, it looks like maybe if you didn't get vaccinated, you might have been the smart 1 in the family. A new study just released that I'm not happy to hear says that all cause mortality is actually higher in a new COVID vaccinated study. Don't say we didn't warn you. Here's what they have to say. Originally published on Infowars, a study published Sunday detailed how individuals who received the COVID vaccine were more likely to die while their booster dose did nothing to help them. In order to view the full study, 1 must download the PDF file, which I'll show you in a second. It says this, that those vaccinated with 1 or 2 doses had a significantly higher risk than the unvaccinated. The study said in the conclusion section that we found all cause death risk to be even higher for those vaccinated with 1 and 2 doses compared to the vaccinated than those with the booster doses were ineffective. We also found a slight but statistically significant loss of life expectancy for those vaccinated with 2 or 3 out of 4 doses. The researchers analyzed data from the Italian province of Pescara for their paper. The McCullough Foundation published this, so the new study found all cause death risks to be higher for those vaccinated with 12 COVID 19 vaccine doses compared to the unvaccinated, and you can see the study. Now we've broken it down directly here in the, document because the researchers calculated the loss of life expectancy of those who were injected with the exotic gene therapy technology or rather how many days of life is lost on average per shot. They used a restricted mean survival time and then restricted mean time lost to articulate the data. We calculated the RMST difference, that represents the best index of life expectancy in those comparisons where the assumptions of the model were not met. And with the RMTL ratio that can approximate the HR in the absence of the proportional hazard assumption, the RMST difference represents the days of life lost. Now you can read the study. It's quite long and it's direct. Joe Rogan will recently was talking about how a lot of this was censored from us. I don't know if you remember this, but the medical industrial complex back in 2023 was being exposed after Elon Musk bought Twitter and then began to show how information about the COVID vaccines was restricted directly by big tech companies at the request of the United States government. Remember this? Speaker 1: I mean, the other craziest thing of all, maybe the some of the most craziest stuff of all is that Facebook censored accurate COVID vaccine side effect information because it didn't want to promote vaccine hesitancy. In other words, the White House is like just pressuring them. I mean, there's this guy Andy Slav and in particular is just this malign actor just pressuring pressuring threatening them. They're nasty in these emails. The the White House, nasty. Speaker 2: In what way? Speaker 1: Oh, just just being just just basically, you know, it's a I mean, Biden does it publicly, so they're killing people. Yeah. They're basically accusing people of I mean, these guys, they don't their gloves are off. I mean, they're just like, you're killing people by laying this information out. I mean, the information is people telling their own story of vaccine side effects. We always point out, like, it was 1 of the great public interest progressive victories in recent memory that the drug companies have to name the side effects of their drugs in their TV ads. Yeah. Like, that's a big part of it. Right? It's like a running joke. You have to name the side effects in the TV ads. Well, here they like, here were ordinary people trying to tell stories of the side effects that they had from the vaccine on Facebook and Twitter and the White House is demanding that Facebook and Twitter censor that stuff. This is the this is just the the worst I mean, that is, I mean, that's just Soviet Chinese style censorship, like, full. Speaker 0: Well, yeah. But the problem is is even in the recent Supreme Court ruling, 6 to 3, I think, they said that the government can do that. They can ask private companies to comply, and it's not a violation of our first amendment. Well, it's actually killing Americans. Americans are dying because of this request of censorship. All cause mortality is higher. That doesn't go to say the fact of even people who are dying directly from complications, like immediate complications. So, if this doesn't wake you up, I don't know what would. Now as many of you know, the wellness company has always been there to provide medications and alternatives, including antibiotics and ivermectin. Many of you know not only is it expensive to go to the emergency room, but a doctor's visit can be a long time away and or medications may not be available in your area. The emergency kits from the wellness company have, ivermectin. They have fluconazole. They have amoxicillin, z packs. Basically, everything you need to fight infections viral and bacterial. Listen. It's going to cost more to go visit an emergency room than it is to have 1 of these kits available, and they may not even have these drugs available in your area because doctors may be trying to push these vaccines down your throat. So if you'd like to get 1 of these kits, get 10% off today at twc.health / headlines. The link is on the screen and in the description. Make sure that you pick up your emergency kit today. Get all the drugs that you needed for your family to be readily available when infections come because they will, and the drugs may not be available to fight it off. Be prepared for the worst at twc.health/ headlines. But before we end, I wanna play this video where Joe Rogan's explaining that this is 1 of the most significant, ideas of our time, these excess deaths that we become so accustomed to, but yet the media completely ignores them. Watch. Speaker 2: If the media was legitimate, they would be talking about 1 of the biggest crises that's happening in this country right now, which is a massive increase in all cause mortality. Yep. It's a massive increase and they're completely sign on on it. It's like in some age groups, it's a 40 plus percent increase in all cause mortality, heart attacks, strokes, cancer. Gee, what what do you think happened that changed where all of a sudden there's this massive increase and it coincides with something else? Don't you think maybe they would investigate that? Wouldn't don't you think that, like, you would have some sort of investigative reporter that dives deep into this and gets to the bottom of it? No. They can't. Because of what you said. They're gonna capture. They're totally captured. 100%. Speaker 0: Yes. And they are captured. If you wanna get more videos like that, follow Vigilant Fox. He's amazing. You can find his account on x. I'm Elijah Schaeffer. Thank you so much again for watching beyond the headlines, only on vigilant news. If you wanna get more of these reports, subscribe to our Rumble and to our x account at vigilant news or direct to your inbox by signing up for our newsletter at vigilant news.com. Have a great rest of the week, and may god bless the United States of America. I'm signing out.
Saved - July 23, 2024 at 3:16 AM

@ShaunRickard67 - Shaun Rickard

"We found that 73.9% of deaths were directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination. Our data suggest a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccination and death." https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073824001968 *Be sure to repost, this needs to be seen by as many people as possible.

A Systematic REVIEW of Autopsy findings in deaths after covid-19 vaccination The rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines, combined with a high number of adverse event reports, have led to concerns over possible mechanisms of inj… sciencedirect.com
Saved - August 12, 2024 at 4:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A recent study claims there is no evidence that COVID vaccines provide benefits, suggesting they may be linked to increased mortality across 125 countries. It highlights that vaccinated individuals could still spread infections and points to a spike in deaths in Australia after a booster rollout. Researchers argue that the notion of vaccines saving lives is unfounded. Additionally, there are updates on the FDA granting new emergency use authorizations and discussions around obtaining treatments like Ivermectin and Z-Pak, alongside concerns about population crises in highly vaccinated nations.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Massive New Study Finds NO EVIDENCE That COVID “Vaccines” Offer Any Benefit The “conspiracy theorists” were right again. Instead of saving lives, the research revealed that COVID “vaccines” are linked to persistent excess deaths across 125 countries. The study also found that vaccinated individuals might spread infections to unvaccinated people, exacerbating the issue. Australia showed a notable spike in mortality following a booster rollout in January 2022. Study researcher Joseph Hickey concluded, “The excess mortality is caused by political interventions, including vaccine rollouts, which show no evidence of preventing excess deaths.” Lead researcher @DenisRancourt added that the idea that COVID vaccines saved lives is “ridiculous.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
A global study found no evidence that COVID vaccines reduced excess deaths. The study analyzed mortality patterns in 125 countries during the pandemic, linking excess deaths to restrictions like lockdowns and vaccine rollouts. Researchers concluded that political interventions, including vaccine campaigns, led to 30 million deaths globally, with 17 million attributed to COVID injections. Excess mortality varied widely between countries, with poverty being a significant factor. The study also suggested that vaccines may have contributed to excess deaths and found no clear benefit from their use. The researchers are continuing to investigate the impacts of pandemic measures and vaccines on mortality.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: New study of a 125 countries finds no evidence that the COVID vaccines provided any benefit. Joseph Hickey, PhD, co author of a global study of excess deaths during the COVID nineteen pandemic, joined the defender in-depth this week to discuss the study's findings and analyse the likely causes contributing to the increase in excess deaths and overall mortality. A new study by a team of Canadian researchers into excess mortality during the COVID nineteen pandemic found that patterns of excess death globally could not be explained by the virus, including long COVID. And by the way, all of the references to everything we're reading today are linked there on the Vigilant News Network article. So you can go and look at that for yourself. We encourage everyone to do so. The study by researchers with correlation research in the public interest examined excess mortality in 100 and 25 countries during the pandemic. It found that mortality patterns correlate closely with the imposition of restrictions such as lock downs and with the COVID 19 injection rollout. The investigation determined that pandemic related restrictions resulted in 30,000,000 deaths globally and that 17,000,000 deaths can be attributed to the COVID 19 injections. The researchers concluded that nothing special would have occurred in terms of mortality had a pandemic not been declared and the declaration had not been acted upon. Hickey explained that all cause mortality refers to the number of deaths without filtering by the cause of death during a given period, while excess deaths refers to how many deaths occurred that are above and beyond what would have been predicted for a certain period. Hickey and the study's co authors analyze pre pandemic raw data from 2015 to 2019 and data collected between 2020 2023. Hickey said the data collected from 125 countries found a large amount of excess deaths. We calculate that over the COVID period, about 0.39 of the global population died in excess. That compares to about 0.97 during the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic. Hickey said this was the largest non war mortality event in a 100 years globally. The study also found patterns of excess mortality across the world were very heterogeneous as they varied significantly from country to country, across regions within the same country and across age groups. Hickey said there are some countries that immediately following the declaration of the pandemic in March of 2020 had an enormous spike in excess mortality that is very sharp, very fast and very narrow, but that does not occur in all countries. There are neighbouring countries that don't have that at all. There are countries that do not have any excess mortality throughout all of 2020, and it's only in 2021 when the injections are rolled out that they suddenly have excess and that excess can be a sharp spike, or it can be raised, raised and sustained plateau noting that none of the countries had any excess death before the declaration of the pandemic, Hickey said this finding does not match the spread of a deadly virus. If you take the model of a new very deadly pathogen that is spreading around the world, you should not see this very high degree of heterogeneity. It's simply not compatible with the hypothesis of a particularly virulent special pathogen, he said. If there was a specifically virulent and dangerous pathogen that was spreading around the world, it would not wait for a political declaration of a pandemic to start causing excess mortality. Instead, a much simpler, much more elegant explanation is that it's the differences in national policies, national measures of one kind or another that are responsible for these very different outcomes in excess mortality, Hickey said. Hickey also notes the biological stress caused by political measures being the big cause of death. He says, over the whole COVID period, there's more excess mortality in that adjusted p score measure where there's more poverty, meaning that the analysis found that the main correlation between excess mortality and a socio economic variable is with poverty. He says it's really more frail populations that would be more affected by things like shutting down the economy, the informal economy, having measures that restrict people to remain in their residences. Obviously that has a much larger impact on poorer people than richer people in terms of their lifestyle, their ability to do exercise, receive goods by delivery and so on. And he says that such measures helped cause biological stress, which disproportionately hurt the poorest out of society in most countries. He also said that treatments such as hospitals placing mildly sick people on ventilators and the associated medications that are used with those, the very significant stress caused by curfews and removing opportunities for work and leaving one's home created a large amount of stress that is medically very significant. Hickey said his team study also identified the COVID 19 injections as a significant contributor to excess deaths. Quote, the vaccine rollouts involve a direct injection of a product into your body that can be toxic, Hickey said, noting that this may be due to several potential factors. And you can see, some of those there, including some clearly toxic components, and also the question around whether it's due to the actual injection product and how it interacts with the body or due to something more simple like the toxic components. Hickey said that the injection related impacts may also have affected unvaccinated people and may have interacted with pandemic related restrictions. Quote, it's also possible that if vaccines have an immune suppressing effect, people who get vaccinated are then more likely to get infected with run of the mill pathogens or omnipresent pathogens, Hickey said. Once they're infected, they could then infect unvaccinated people who also might be subject to some immunosuppression based on the measures and the stress that accompanies the vaccine rollouts. Peaks in excess deaths across countries studied correlate very closely with peaks in vaccination in those same countries, Hickey said. Australia is a really striking example where in January of 2022, which is the summer in Australia, when there's normally a trough in all cause mortality, at exactly that time, there was a booster rollout, the first booster, and there is a very abnormal peak in mortality at the exact same time. His analysis also found that no apparent benefit of the COVID 19 injections noting that the countries that were most injected had the highest injection uptake end up having persistent excess mortality into 2023. It says at the end of the day, excess mortality is caused by political interventions by public health measures that should not have been applied. And that includes the injection rollouts because there is very clearly no evidence that the injections prevented excess deaths or caused any benefit. Hickey said Corollation is working on more great interesting research, including a comprehensive study of what happened in the spring of 2020 in sub sub national jurisdictions, noting that his team has already identified some very interesting results with that. We look forward to more of what they're going to find. And Hickey says we're not funded by any governments or any corporations. Any funding we get is from individual donations and all we can do is try to seek the truth. We're doing the best that we can to illuminate as much as we can, and we're grateful for them. Again, you can watch that full broadcast there linked on the Vigilant News Network, and we encourage everyone to go back, look at the links included, the source documents and share them widely. Everybody's talking about those weight loss injections because the results are so dramatic. They work by lowering blood sugar and reducing appetite. But what if you need to lose weight, but you don't have the money and don't like weekly shots? Well, that's why doctors created a weight loss supplement called Lean and the results are remarkable. The studied ingredients in Lean have been shown to lower your blood sugar, burn fat by converting it into energy and curb your appetite and cravings, so you're not as hungry. But listen, lean is not for the casual dieter with only a few pounds to lose. The doctors at BrickHouse Nutrition created lean for frustrated dieters with 10 or more pounds to lose. Let's get you started with 15% off and free rush shipping so you can add lean to your healthy diet and exercise plan. Visitleanvnndot com and enter promo code VNN for your 15% discount. That's promo code VNN at leanvnn.com.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

More Stories: PLANdemic 2.0 Draws Closer as FDA Grants New EUA https://vigilantnews.com/post/plandemic-2-0-draws-closer-as-fda-grants-new-eua-beyond-the-headlines/

PLANdemic 2.0 Draws Closer as FDA Grants New EUA | Beyond the Headlines Bill Gates, of course, has his fingerprints all over this. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

How to Get Ivermectin, Z-Pak, and More https://vigilantnews.com/post/how-to-get-ivermectin-z-pak-and-more/

How to Get Ivermectin, Z-Pak, and More While millions of Americans understand the need to be prepared, far too many are failing to stockpile one of the single most important items. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The most vaxxed country on Earth is now facing a population crisis. https://vigilantnews.com/post/the-most-vaxxed-country-on-earth-now-faces-a-population-crisis/

The Most Vaxxed Country on Earth Now Faces a Population Crisis Sh*t continues to hit the fan. vigilantnews.com
Saved - September 28, 2024 at 9:33 AM

@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”

Individuals who have received four doses of Covid-19 mRNA vaccines are dying in unprecedented numbers according to official UK government data which reveals that four-doses vaccinated young adults are 318% more likely to die than their unvaccinated peers. https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/uk-govt-data-reveals-staggering-death-surge-in-four-dose-covid-vaccinated-cohort/

UK Gov’t Data Reveals 'Staggering' Death Surge in Four-Dose COVID-Vaccinated Cohort Individuals who have received four doses of Covid-19 mRNA vaccines are dying in unprecedented numbers according to official UK government data. thepeoplesvoice.tv
Saved - January 1, 2025 at 10:59 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In this extensive thread, I share alarming evidence and personal testimonies linking COVID injections to a rise in aggressive cancers, termed "turbo cancers." Experts, including oncologists and pathologists, describe how these vaccines may suppress the immune system, leading to rapid cancer progression. Anecdotal accounts from individuals reveal a troubling pattern of aggressive cancers developing shortly after vaccination. Scientific studies and VAERS data suggest significant increases in cancer rates post-vaccination, raising serious concerns about the long-term effects of these injections.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

THE COVID INJECTIONS CAUSE AGGRESSIVE (TURBO) CANCERS EN MASSE: A MEGA-THREAD SHOWCASING THE OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE OF AN UNTHINKABLE HORROR THAT WILL TOUCH US ALL (1/57+)🧵 (Stick this thread on any post with a Community Note saying the injections don’t cause turbo cancers.) Thread index: Tweets 1–16: Physicians, Scientists, and Industry Experts—from the U.S., U.K., Canada, Germany, and Sweden—Describe How the COVID Injections Cause Turbo Cancers The injections— -Severely degrade the immune system, particularly causing T-cell suppression -Are adulterated with DNA plasmids, which contain the notorious SV40 promoter sequence, which has not only been associated with oncogenesis, but also binding with P53 a.k.a. “the guardian of the genome” -Are associated with far more aggressive cancers than what was normal prior to the injections’ rollout -Are associated with increasing rates of cancers Tweets 17–23: Anecdotal interviews with people describing aggressive cancers in themselves, their friends, or family members who’ve taken one or more COVID injections. Tweets 24–39: Evidence in the scientific literature and regulatory documentation that supports the idea that the COVID injections degrade the immune system, are capable of causing aggressive cancers, and contain DNA and SV40 contamination. Tweets 40–47: A—small—sample of the VAERS reports linking the COVID injections to various types of cancers. Tweets 48–57: Users on X speak out about themselves, family, or friends who developed an aggressive, often fatal, cancer following receipt of one or more COVID injections. NOTE: Please add your own COVID injection–related “turbo cancer” story to this thread to bolster the already overwhelming evidence that it is indeed a real phenomenon. —----------------------- DR. DAVID RASNICK—“I’m convinced that the true explanation of what’s behind turbo cancer is that these [COVID] injections…are devastating the immune system…[and] now we’re seeing a consequence of that devastated immune system.” In this first tweet, we start by hearing from cancer and AIDS research titan Dr. David Rasnick, who notes in a 2024 interview with Children’s Health Defense that this phenomenon of “turbo cancers” is new, and is defined by cancers that appear and grow to Stage 3 or Stage 4—i.e. “lethal”—in a matter of months. Rasnick, who earned a PhD in chemistry from the Georgia Institute of Technology in 1978, has more than 20 years of experience in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries, published numerous scientific papers, and invented novel laboratory techniques, notes that these turbo cancers are also affecting younger people than usual, including people in their 20s. “When it [the turbo cancer] develops, they get late stage cancer and they’re dead really, really quickly,” Rasnick says. “That is new.” Furthermore, Rasnick says the only other time these kinds of rapid-growing cancers have been observed was in lab animals that were made to be immune deficient “by design.” “I’m convinced that the true explanation of what’s behind turbo cancer,” Rasnick says, “is that these [COVID] injections…these mRNA and DNA genetic injections…are devastating the immune system…[and] now we’re seeing a consequence of that devastated immune system.” Rasnick adds, “Once your immune system is really, really depressed, now these things [cancers] can develop rapidly.” The cancer researcher adds, “We’re basically doing to human beings what we did to laboratory animals: We’re destroying their immune systems to the point where they can’t resist the cancer. And the cancers are now growing like they are in cell culture. They don’t have anything impeding their ability to proliferate.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Turbo cancer refers to a concerning trend where cancer progresses from initial stages to advanced stages in a matter of months, particularly in young individuals. This rapid development is linked to a compromised immune system, likely due to mRNA and DNA vaccines, which are described as genetic injections rather than traditional vaccines. These injections appear to weaken the immune response, allowing tumors that may have been benign or dormant to grow unchecked. This phenomenon mirrors previous observations in immune-deficient animals, suggesting that the same detrimental effects are now occurring in humans. Essentially, the immune system's inability to combat cancer cells leads to accelerated tumor growth, akin to conditions observed in laboratory settings.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The turbo cancer thing, which is new, is that instead of taking decades for the cancer to develop all the way from nowhere to stage 3 and stage 4, which which release the cancers, we we're seeing this happen now in the order of months. And in young people like in their twenties, and and they get really when it develops, they get late stage cancer and they're dead really really quickly. That is new. The only time we have ever seen this rapid or so called turbo, that's what they call it now, we just call it accelerated cancer in the animals or things because they were immune deficient by by design. Now what we're doing, I think the simplest, best explanation and I'm convinced the true explanation of what's behind turbo cancer is is that these injections, these, nucleoside, I mean, these mRNA and DNA vaccines, these genetic injections, they're not vaccines, these genetic injections are devastating the immune system. We we we know that's happening already but now we're seeing a consequence of that devastated immune system. That's an acceleration of tumors that were probably already in you to begin with where benign probably go away on their own. You'd never know you've had it. And but once your immune system is really really depressed, now these things can develop rapidly. And we can we know that in animals, we've caused it in animals, you know, for decades. I personally didn't. I didn't work with those cool things. I was just a regular laboratory as a chemist. But, so now we're doing it in people. We're basically doing to human beings what we did to laboratory animals. We're destroying their immune systems to the point where, they they can't resist the cancer, and the cancer cells are now growing like they are in cell culture. They don't have anything impeding impeding their their, their ability to proliferate. And, that that in a nutshell is what turbocancer is.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(2/57) DR. RYAN COLE — “[These shots]...cause immune suppression. They cause a disruption and dysregulation of your immune system that normally is what would fight cancer.” In this clip from a 2023 interview with Greg Hunter, Dr. Ryan Cole, a board-certified pathologist and founder of Cole Diagnostics Inc. in Boise, Idaho, says that he saw early warning signs of immune system suppression following the rollout of the COVID injections and warned people that they “suppress the immune system.” Cole notes that the injections “alter the way your immune system works.” He adds that they “[put] your T cells to sleep” in such a way that they can’t perform their “surveillance” duties “to fight cancer.” The veteran pathologist adds that he has traveled the world, talking to oncologists, pathologists, family doctors, et al., who say that they’re “seeing cancers…in age groups…never seen before, and it happened after the rollout of the shots.” Cole adds that insurance datasets and some countries’ disability data confirms the huge uptick in cancers. In the U.K., for example, Cole says that in 2021, there was a 6–7% rise in cancers; in 2022, there was a staggering 35% increase. “Those are the types of data that we’re seeing that [are] really concerning,” Cole adds.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Many people have received COVID shots for various reasons. However, there are concerning trends regarding autoimmune diseases, heart inflammation in young people, and rising cancer rates. The lipid nanoparticle mRNA technology used in these vaccines has not been proven safe long-term. These shots may suppress the immune system, particularly T cells, which are crucial for fighting infections and cancer. This immune suppression has led to what some are calling "turbo cancers," characterized by aggressive and unusual tumor behavior. Reports from pathologists indicate an increase in aggressive cancers in younger populations since the vaccine rollout, with significant rises in cancer rates noted in disability datasets. The data is alarming and suggests a need for caution regarding these vaccines.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So many people got these shots, you know, for whatever reason I'm not here to judge. If you got 1, don't get 2. If you get 2, don't get 3. If you got 3, don't get 4. If you never got 1, please don't get 1. And here's why: because the amount of autoimmune disease we're seeing, the amount of inflammation in the hearts of healthy young people that we're seeing, the amount of neurologic damage and harm, Parkinson's, exacerbation, worsening of of dementia and Alzheimer's disease, and, you know, to bring the monster in the room, cancer, is on the uptick. And, and it's not me just saying, oh, well, you know, my job as a pathologist is to observe patterns, and if I see something, I say something. And what do you hear in the airports when you travel? If you see something, say something. Well, I did, and I still am. It's not just that these COVID shots are bad, it's anything with the lipid nanoparticle mRNA technology shot is not proven to be long term safe. So it's this whole platform that we have. So we're we're in trouble. We're seeing steady rises in all these chronic diseases that I mentioned, and you mentioned Greg, and unfortunately the cancer, statistics, I saw an early warning sign when these shots rolled out. I was the first one in the world to go public with it and said, hey, yeah, I did. And Really? I yeah. And at that point, I knew. I said, look, we have immune dysregulation. You want a healthy immune system. These shots suppress the immune system. Doctor Fossa out of the Netherlands, when he looked at the Pfizer vaccines and studies, showed that it was altering the way your immune system works. That's not good. It puts your t cells to sleep in a manner that they can't fight, and t cells are basically the marines of your immune system. They're in the frontline warriors, and all day long, you know, you and I sitting here right now, anybody listening, we have about 30,000,000,000 T cells circulating around in our body, and they're shaking hands and talking to yourselves, Hey, are you a friend? Are you a a foe? Are you infected? Are you a cancer cell? You know, what do we do with you? And so it's just knocking on the door, checking all the time with all your cells. Well, these shots, instead of having those be hearty, on the front line, healthy soldiers, it makes them kind of drunk and go back to the barracks and go to sleep. And now they can't do that surveillance, on the, you know, exactly to fight cancer, and so people ask, well, well, you know, do these shots cause cancer? Well, they cause immune suppression. They cause a disruption and a dysregulation of your immune system that normally is what would fight cancer. So that's what we're up against. And so, yeah, I shouted the warning early on, I was attacked for doing so, and here we are, all the data points that we can get are going upward. And there are a lot of data points Hold Speaker 1: on just a minute, I just want to, before Speaker 0: we get in. Yeah. Anytime. I'll write it. Speaker 1: When you say it doesn't cause cancer, you are one of the people that have used this turbo cancer. So we're getting turbo cancers because there's nothing there to fight it. Speaker 0: Well, yeah. Because those T cells have gone to sleep to a degree that they would normally fight off cancer, and now they're not there to fight off that cancer. And so the the term turbo cancer, a good friend in Sweden, pathologist, Doctor Ute Kruger, she was the one seeing, after the rollout of the shots, a really big uptick in breast cancers in her pathology practice. And these tumors were more aggressive, were larger than she was used to seeing, and were behaving in a manner that she hadn't seen before, so she called them turbocancers. And then that term got popularized and kind of spread around the world. And as I travel the world, talk to physicians, oncologists, pathologists, family docs, internists, OBGYNs, you name it, and they come to me at these meetings and say, I'm seeing cancers in my practice in age groups I've never seen before and it happened after the rollout of the shots. And the datasets are available in insurance datasets and in some countries we can get into the disability datasets like the United Kingdom, Ed Dowd and his group at financetechnologies.com with a PH, they they went in and looked at the disability dataset. In 2020 there was about a 1 point something percent increase in cancer, in 2021, about 6-seven percent, but in 2022, there was a 35% expected above average. So those are the type of data we're seeing that is really concerning.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(3/57) DR. ROGER HODKINSON— “The immune system has been taken off its watch…[there could be] a tsunami of…cancer and other conditions that have been brought on…by this vaccination program.” In this clip from a 2022 interview with the RAIR Foundation, Dr. Roger Hodkinson, a medical specialist in pathology, a graduate of Cambridge University, and a Fellow at the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (FRCPC), echoes Dr. Ryan Cole’s concerns regarding the COVID injections’ deleterious effects on the immune system. “One of the primary functions of the immune system is to surveil the entire body, looking for little, tiny cancers that can be knocked off before they get to a size when they produce a lump or a syndrome that kills you…[And] with the [COVID] vaccination, having a profound impact on the vitality of our immune system, the deep concern is that some of these cancers that are being reported, or maybe all of them, are due to immune escape,” Hodkinson says. The pathologist adds, “the immune system has been…taken off its watch…and the cancer has been allowed to proliferate in a way that it would not normally have done.” Hodkinson goes on to note: “[This] could result in a tsunami of…cancer and other conditions that have been brought on…by this vaccination program.” He adds, “When…something of this magnitude…is not studied, that is cause for enormous concern. Because that is not the way medicine works.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Recent reports suggest a significant increase in cancer rates post-vaccination, with anecdotal evidence indicating a potential tripling. The exact incidence remains unclear, but the immune system's role in identifying and eliminating early cancer cells is crucial. Vaccination may temporarily impair immune surveillance, allowing cancers to proliferate unchecked. This raises concerns about a possible surge in cancer cases resulting from the vaccination program. Some healthcare professionals, like Dr. Ryan Cole in Idaho, have noted increased cancer activity, highlighting the lack of thorough studies typically associated with vaccine development. Normally, vaccines undergo extensive research over several years, but this process was expedited in this case, raising alarms about potential complications.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's been a lot of reports recently about it well, the the number I've been seeing kicked around is a 300% or tripling of cancer rates since the rollout of the injections. Speaker 1: Is that Speaker 0: your understanding? And do would you wanna go into the mechanism of that a little bit? Speaker 1: Yes. The true incidence of, cancer post vaccination is still not clear. What is clear is that there are enough anecdotal reports, globally, to strongly suggest that that is happening. The mechanism by which that would take place is very clear and well known. Because the immune system, does not just fight off infections, which is what most people think of. The job of the immune system is to figure out anything that's not you that's entering your body or is in your body. And of course, bugs are one thing that's not you. But equally, cancer, because of the fact that it's only a cancer because it's mutated. The DNA is different from you. The immune system, one of the prime functions of the immune system, is to constantly surveil the entire body looking for little tiny cancers that can be knocked off before they get to a size when they produce a lump or a syndrome that eventually kills you. And we believe that that process is is going on for our entire lives with meticulous efficiency because it's only when the balance of forces changes for various reasons as we get older that those little cancers don't get knocked off and do escape control. So with the vaccination having a profound impact on the vitality of our immune system, The the deep concern is that some of these cancers that are being reported, or maybe all of them, are due to immune escape. That the immune system has been basically taken off its watch for a period of time. And during that period of time, the cancer has been allowed to proliferate in a way that it would not normally have done. How prevalent that is, it's very unclear right now. Early. Again, we don't know what we don't know. And it could result in it could could result in a tsunami of conditions, cancer and other conditions, that have been brought on specifically and unintentionally by this vaccination program. Speaker 0: My. So that's something to definitely keep an eye for. Anecdotally, apparently, some on call just are reporting considerably more activity Speaker 1: than others. Doctor Ryan Cole, particularly in Idaho, was the first one to blow the whistle, but he's not the only one. It's you you see, when there's something of this magnitude, which is so obvious, when there's something of that magnitude that's not studied, that's cause for enormous concern. Because that's not the way medicine works. Vaccines, for example, vaccines are usually studied with great thoroughness for 5 to 10 years. Ordinary vaccines. Not a new technology, but just ordinary. You know, an attenuated virus, a dead virus. That's what we normally do. This time, that was trashed. Wholesale. Trashed. For something, there's nothing worse than a bad seasonal flu with all these gigantic potential complications.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(4/57) SCIENTIST KEVIN MCKERNAN—”The EMA…has documents that have leaked showing a one to 815-fold variance in the amount of DNA contamination that are in these vaccines.” In this clip from a presentation given to the International COVID Summit in 2024, Kevin McKernan, Founder and Chief Scientific Officer of Medicinal Genomics, as well as former R&D lead of the Human Genome Project, describes how there is “DNA contamination” in the mRNA COVID injections from both Pfizer and Moderna. McKernan notes that there is DNA plasmid contamination of between one and 815-fold from injection lot to injection lot (i.e. batch to batch) and that the contamination has been found by scientists in multiple states in the U.S. and in Germany. (The one to 815-fold figure means that the amount of DNA plasmids present in a given injection is up to 815 times the allowable amount set by regulatory agencies.) McKernan notes that regulators have, in turn, been forced to respond to the contamination and that the FDA in the U.S., the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and Health Canada have all confirmed that there is indeed DNA plasmids in the COVID mRNA injections. McKernan notes that the regulators have also confirmed that this DNA contamination includes the so-called “SV40 promoter,” which is a DNA sequence derived from the Simian Virus 40 that enhances gene expression. I.e. the SV40 promoter helps to import the contaminating DNA plasmids into the nucleus of the cell. Furthermore, McKernan notes that the inclusion of the SV40 in the contaminating DNA plasmids was originally withheld from the regulators by Pfizer. Note that, as outlined in the documentation in tweet 39 in this mega-thread, an FDA guidance document published back in 2010 states the following: “Residual DNA might be a risk to your final product because of oncogenic [i.e. cancer causing] and/or infectivity potential. There are several potential mechanisms by which residual DNA could be oncogenic, including the integration and expression of encoded oncogenes or insertional mutagenesis following DNA integration.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is significant evidence of DNA contamination in vaccines, with findings from multiple researchers in Germany, Japan, France, and the U.S. Regulatory bodies like the FDA and EMA acknowledge this contamination but downplay its importance based on Pfizer's reassurances. Initially, clinical trials used clean DNA, but the mass-produced vaccines used unfiltered plasma DNA, increasing contamination. The regulators received a misleading plasmid map, omitting crucial annotations. Claims about expired vials are false, as tests show decay can be measured accurately. Critics argue that the PCR methods used by regulators are inadequate, and Moderna's vaccines are cleaner. The regulators' use of different measurement methods for RNA and DNA raises concerns about transparency and compliance with regulations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What we do have is reproduction in spades. We now have people in Germany, Japan. We have people in France who have seen this DNA contamination. The EMA even has documents that have leaked showing there is a one to 8 15 fold variance in the amount of DNA contamination there in these vaccines. That was data that was given to them cherry picked by Pfizer. We also have Doctor. Buchholz work in South Carolina that has replicated this qPCR. He's even done Oxford Nanopore sequencing on this. Doctor. Xin Lee has done Sanger sequencing in Connecticut. Doctor. Bridget Koning has done work in Germany. This much reproduction has forced the regulators to respond. We've got responses now from the FDA, from the EMA and from Health Canada that have all acknowledged this contamination is there. Now they disagree that it matters because they turn to their sponsors to get that answer. They've gone to Pfizer and asked them what is in these shots and doesn't matter. And they were handed an answer saying it's of no consequence. I'm going to show you why they're wrong on those three points. Let's back up a little bit. What happened here, in the clinical trials, they actually ran the clinical trial and clean DNA that was PCR amplified from a plasmid template, all right. That makes it a million fold cleaner above background. They then did a bait and switch. And when they went to the mass market with this, they gave everyone vaccines that skipped that PCR step and therefore was working off of plasma DNA alone. What that means is more background DNA from the plasma gets into the vaccines and more endotoxin presumably gets into the vaccines. This bait and switch was documented into Rest of Levy had published this. So what did they hand to the regulators? They handed the regulators this plasmid map on the right, which you'll notice is missing any sequence annotation from 6 to 9 on the map. That's very awkward. If you ever use plasmid annotation tools, they annotate everything on the map and they don't leave anything unannotated. So some big advisor had to go in and actively delete this annotation and hand it to the regulators and market. And so we're seeing a lot of growth in the market. And so we're seeing a lot of growth in the market. And so we're seeing a lot of growth in the market. And so we're seeing a lot of growth in the market. And so we're seeing a lot of growth in the market. Well, they're hiding the fact that this tool will define their system as a gene therapy, because it's a nuclear targeting sequencing. It moves DNA directly to the nucleus within hours in all cell lines, all right? Now they've also tried to attack the fact that we used expired vials. It's not true. We've had other people use vials that aren't expired. And this is a really bad position of theirs to take because they gave expired vials to patients. And it's very easy for you to measure whether something has decayed with an RNA integrity plot. We've done that. So this is a red herring. It's also a little bit bizarre. They've challenged that our PCR results aren't using proper methods. They have not published their methods. But you can go to Moderna's own patents, which will teach you that qPCR underestimates the problem, and therefore they had to invent new tools to get rid of the cna. Moderna does have cleaner vaccines, by the way, from a DNA standpoint. Why did they do this? Well, the regulators in some jurisdictions are letting them measure the DNA with 2 different yardsticks, and they care about a ratio of RNA to DNA. So what they do is they use a different method that inflates the RNA values, something known as fluorometry, and then they move to qPCR to measure the DNA. Now you've all probably had a COVID test or know that they measure RNA. So if you have primers that can measure DNA and you don't use them to measure the RNA, you are a fraud. And the regulators either don't know this or they are complicit in the crime. They're letting them use 2 different yarnsticks because without these 2 different yarnsticks, they can't pass these regulations.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(5/57) PROF. ANGUS DALGLEISH—“[The] synthetic DNA contamination…in…vials of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines…presents risks of genomic instability, which can manifest as cancers…” Professor Angus Dalgleish, a professor of oncology at St. George’s, University of London, describes in a presentation given to the Special Council at Port Hedland Town in Western Australia in 2024 how the DNA contamination found in the COVID mRNA injections by McKernan, et al. “can manifest as cancers, immune disorders, and hereditary diseases.” “Synthetic DNA contamination as detected in Australian vials of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines by David Speicher presents risks of genomic instability, which can manifest as cancers, immune disorders, and hereditary diseases,” Dalgleish says. “The vaccines contain lipid nanoparticles, which encapsulate synthetic DNA fragments. These nanoparticles deliver this DNA into various organs throughout the body, where the DNA has the potential to integrate into our own genetic material. As such these vaccines are not ‘vaccines,’ they are, in fact, gene therapy based. This genomic integration, as the scientific literature makes clear, can lead to cancer development, immune system disruption, and more. The sheer levels of contamination detected…in some cases are extraordinary, and far beyond what should be allowed in any medicinal product.” Dalgleish goes on to note: “While this may sound like a remote possibility…we are already seeing evidence of these effects in real patients. In my work as an oncologist in the U.K., I started to see a disturbing trend as early as February 2022. Patients who had been cancer free for many years were suddenly relapsing with aggressive, explosive cancers shortly after receiving booster doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. I personally counted six cases in as many weeks in patients who developed a rapid progression, having been completely stable, with zero disease, having been on an immunotherapy I had given them 5, 8, 10, 15, 18 years ago.” Dalgleish adds: “All these patients only had one thing in common, and that was they had all been forced to have a [COVID-injection] booster by their GPs on the grounds they were at risk. One of the most unsettling aspects of the nature of these cancers is that they are not slow progressing…they are aggressive, often presenting at advanced stages, affecting multiple organs by the time they are diagnosed. Colorectal cancer has specifically shown explosive growth—something we’ve never seen before. These cancers are emerging faster and more virulent than we would expect in patients who otherwise have been stable.” Dalgleish also notes a rise in blood cancers, such as leukemias and lymphomas, which have “appeared shortly after vaccinations.” “I have had many colleagues and patients express concerns about the timing of these cancers following what I believe are totally unnecessary boosters, which is not an isolated issue,” the oncologist goes on to say. “My own research has shown that the boosters suppress the T cell response and switch[es] the antibody response to tolerizing. That means this is the perfect example where you have switched off the policing of foreign invaders, viruses, etc. and cancer, allowing it to grow uncontrolled.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Research indicates risks of foreign synthetic DNA integrating into human cells, potentially leading to serious health issues like cancer and immune disorders. Contamination found in Australian vials of Pfizer and Moderna vaccines raises concerns about genomic instability. These vaccines function more like gene therapy, as lipid nanoparticles deliver synthetic DNA into the body, where it may integrate into our genetic material. In clinical observations, patients who had been cancer-free for years experienced aggressive relapses after receiving COVID-19 booster doses. Notably, colorectal cancer cases are growing rapidly, and there is an increase in blood cancers like leukemias and lymphomas post-vaccination. The timing of these cancers has raised alarms among healthcare professionals. Research shows that boosters may suppress T-cell responses, impairing the immune system's ability to combat foreign invaders and cancer, leading to uncontrolled growth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Decades of research have demonstrated the risks of foreign DMA integrating into human cells leading to potentially catastrophic outcomes. Synthetic DMA contamination as detected in Australian vials of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID 19 vaccines by David Spiker presents risks of a genomic instability which can manifest as cancers, immune disorders, and hereditary diseases. To explain in more straightforward terms, the vaccines contain lipid nanoparticles which encapsulate synthetic DNA fragments. These nanoparticles deliver this DNA into various organs throughout the body where the DNA has the potential to integrate into our own genetic material. As such, these vaccines are not vaccines. They are in fact a gene therapy based. This genomic integration, as the scientific literature makes clear, can lead to cancer development, immune system disruption, and more. The sheer levels of contamination detected up to a 145 times missile per missile limit in some cases are extraordinary and far beyond what should be allowed in any medicinal product. The real world evidence from the UK, While this may sound like a remote possibility, I am here to tell you that we are already seeing evidence of these effects in real patients. In my work as an oncologist in the UK, I started to see a disturbing trend as early as February 2022. Patients who had been cancer free for many years were suddenly relapsing with aggressive explosive cancers shortly after receiving booster doses of the COVID 19 vaccine. I personally counted 6 cases in as many weeks in patients who developed a rapid progression having been completely stable with 0 disease having been on the immunotherapy I gave them 5, 8, 10, 15, 18 years ago. I am used to people who, progress when they develop severe depression, such as during divorce, bereavement, debt, etcetera. But all these patients only had one thing in common, and that was they've all been forced to have a booster by the patient by their GPs on the grounds they were at risk. One of the most unsettling aspects in the nature of these cancers is that they're not slow progressing that we are accustomed to managing. They are aggressive, often presenting in advanced stages affecting multiple organs by the time they're diagnosed. Colorectal cancer, in particular, is showing explosive growth, something we've never seen before. These cancers are emerging faster and more virulent than we would expect in patients who otherwise been stable. In addition to cancer relapses, I've encountered a rise in blood cancers such as leukemias and lymphomas, which have appeared shortly after vaccinations. I have had many colleagues and patients express concerns about the timing of these cancers following what I believe to be totally unnecessary boosters. It is not an isolated issue. My own research has shown that the boosters suppress the t cell response and switch the antibody response to tolerizing. That means this is a perfect example where you have switched off the policing of foreign, invaders, viruses, etcetera, and cancer, allowing it to grow uncontrolled.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(6/57) DR. UTE KRÜGER—“Ultimately, I saw a correlation that the tumors appeared on average three [3] months after these so-called ‘vaccinations.’” In this clip from an interview with klaTVEnglish from 2024, Dr. Ute Krüger, a pathologist and breast cancer researcher in Sweden, describes her experience witnessing the exact same phenomenon Dr. Angus Dalgleish did in the previous tweet: explosive, aggressive cancers that appeared in cancer patients who were previously stable prior to receiving one or more COVID injections. Krüger describes how, following the rollout of the COVID injections, she began to see the largest tumors she had ever seen in her career. “And the tumors simply grew more aggressively, and there were more frequent occurrences, [meaning] relapses,” Krüger adds. The pathologist and breast cancer researcher notes: “Patients may have been tumor free for 20 years, and then a few months after these injections against corona, the tumor suddenly came back. And with such aggressiveness that the patients often died as a result.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tumors have been growing more aggressively, with sizes ranging from 4 to 16 centimeters, and patients experiencing frequent recurrences. Some patients, previously tumor-free for years, saw rapid tumor regrowth after COVID-19 vaccinations. Multifocal tumors, where multiple tumors appear in one breast, have also increased. For example, a 55-year-old patient had a 13-centimeter ductal carcinoma with over 20 invasive spots. Another case involved an 80-year-old who found a rapidly growing tumor in her previously operated breast just three months post-vaccination, along with skin metastases. Additionally, a 70-year-old woman with lobular breast cancer experienced explosive tumor growth in the liver after vaccination, leading to her death within a month. Observations indicate that tumors often reappear approximately three months after these vaccinations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So in the past, a tumor was the size yeah. With the size of 4 centimeters was very rare. Now tumors were 4 to 16 centimeters. The largest tumor I've seen was 16 centimeters in size. You have to look at that on a ruler. It's huge. And the tumors simply grew more aggressively, and there were more frequent recurrences, so relapses. Patients may have been tumor free for 20 years, and then Speaker 1: a few months after these injections against corona, the tumor suddenly came back. And I'm not Speaker 0: against corona, the tumor Speaker 1: suddenly came back. And with Speaker 0: such aggressiveness that the patients often died as a result. And then I noticed that it occurred more frequently that there are several tumors in one breast, for for example. So multi multifocal tumors. And also that tumors occur in both breasts at the same time. Speaker 1: This foreign word means that there are several tumors in one place. Speaker 0: Yes. Exactly. The multifocality that there are several tumors in one breast. I brought some images with me of this, which show this, this multifocality. This is material from a 55 year old female patient who has a 130 millimeter ductal carcinoma. In other words, a tumor in the breast that is growing in the ducts. So 13 centimeters alone is extremely large. And in this area, she had 20 different so at least 20 different invasive. In other words, spots where the tumor had already grown out of the ducts and into the tissue. And here in the picture, you can see in the blue area, this is the area with the tumor in the ducts. And these red areas show these invasive foci where the tumor is already growing into the tissue. So here in this section alone, there are 7 invasive foci. Speaker 1: This picture here is a cross section? Speaker 0: Exactly. This is how the pathologist sees the material under the microscope. This is a cross section of the breast, and this is how the diagnosis finally made in pathology. There was also a pronounced growth in the lymph vessel far outside of the tumor. And she already had had 4 lymph node metastases. So the lymph nodes were already affected, which is also relatively rare. But that is because the tumor has grown so aggressively. And then I brought another picture on the subject of reoccurrence. This is an 80 year old patient who had undergone breast conserving therapy 7 years previously. This means that the area of the tumor was cut out of the breast and the rest of the breast was still there. And 3 months after this so called vaccination against corona, she found a tumor in this operated breast. And it grew extremely quickly. And in the surgical preparation, it was already 55 millimeters in size. So she also had several skin metastases in her breast at the same time. This is something that is extremely rare that the patient comes with a relapse and already has skin metastases at the same time. Those normally come much later. And here you can see the current surgical preparation. The green area is the scar from the operation 7 years ago. And then this red area right next to it here, that's the tumor that's growing there. It is only very small here, but you can see this direct connection to the scar. That's why I chose this cross section. And next, I also brought a cross section to illustrate the issue of tumor heterogeneity. And this means that the tumor can be found with different growth patterns. So this material is from a 70 year old woman who had had lobular breast cancer for several years, meaning a breast cancer that grows relatively slowly. And so she had had numerous metastases in the bladder, in the intestinal mucosa, in the bones, in the liver. And she had already lived with these metastases for 3 years. In other words, her body was in a state of relative equilibrium. But shortly after this so called vaccination, the tumor growth in the liver explodes, and the patient dies within a month. And the clinician who sent me this liver cylinder, so a cylindric sample punctured out of the liver, He wrote on the submission form that he had noticed that the tumor growth had exploded in the liver, but that nothing was visible at the other metastatic sites. And here, you can see normal liver tissue on the right side and this lobular tumor in the middle. You can't actually see very much of the tumor, but what you see are small dark dots. And on the far side, the far left side, this very dark area, this is the newly added tumor with the dark core and with the rapidly growing tumor. Ultimately, I saw the correlation that the tumors appeared on the average 3 months after these so called vaccinations.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(7/57) DR. JOHN CAMPBELL, describing the work of DR. DAVID SPEICHER—“The Moderna [injection] can contain up to 10 [trillion] copies of DNA fragments per dose.” In this clip from a video posted in October 2024, Dr. John Campbell, a semi-retired nurse lecturer, describes work performed by molecular virologist Dr. David Speicher, which found that in some of the COVID injection vials, there are 10 TRILLION copies of the DNA plasmids. Campbell notes that 3 to 10 copies is “enough to cause incorporation of SV40 DNA contamination into the nuclear genome of the cell, thereby causing a mutation, which has been identified in cell cultures in chromosomes 9 and 12, including an oncogene that can potentially cause cancer.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Health Canada initially claimed the Pfizer vaccine did not contain SV40, but later acknowledged its presence, stating it has no functional role. Despite this, they sought clarification from Pfizer about the residual fragments. When asked for information, Health Canada provided redacted documents, raising questions about transparency. A technique called fluorometry, which labels DNA with fluorescent markers, revealed that some RNA vaccines, particularly Moderna's, could contain up to 10 trillion copies of DNA fragments per dose. This is concerning because just 3 to 10 copies can facilitate the incorporation of SV40 DNA into a cell's nuclear genome, potentially leading to mutations associated with cancer.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Health Canada has said there's no increased risk of cancers, and they also said at first that the Pfizer vaccine does not contain SV 40, but they were wrong. It does. They later said that although the SV 40 is present, so a bit of backpedaling there from Health Canada, that, the SV 40 the the SV 40 is the the contamination sequence. One of the contamination sequences of DNA that can get back into the nuclear material of the cell and cause mutation. Health Canada says that's got no functional role. So first of all, they said it's not there, and they said, oh oh, you know what? It is there. And they said, but don't worry about it. It doesn't do anything. But then Health Canada asked Pfizer about the residual fragment. So having Health Canada declared that it does nothing, they then wrote to Pfizer. So Health Canada know that these, these this contaminating SV 40 potential cancer causing sequence is there. And then, Health Canada was asked like a freedom of information request. Health Canada was asked for this information from Pfizer, but it came back redacted. Why why would they want to hide the scientific information, Health Canada? Why would they want to do that? Now, doctor speaker uses a technique called a fluorometry. Now this basically attaches a fluorescent molecule to the DNA, and then that means when the DNA is present, you can see it with your microscope. It fluoresces, and you can you can actually see it. It's giving off light. Now this is a good technique. This fluorometry is a good technique to give quantitative analysis of all of the DNA. So it analyzes all of the DNA that's present. It's a better technique than quantitative PCR because it's analyzing all of the DNA and labeling with this fluorescent marker all of the DNA that's present. And, it's found that in some, DNA in some some RNA, vaccines, some RNA vaccines, there is 10,000,000,000,000 copies of this DNA sequence, per dose. Now I was taken aback by this. Doctor speaker was found that some, the Moderna one particularly, can contain up to 10,000,000, copies of DNA fragment per dose. And we've just said that 3 to 10 copies of s v 40 DNA fragment is enough to facilitate transport into the person's own DNA into the cellular nuclear DNA. So 3 to 10 copies per cell and up to 10,000,000,000,000 copies. So that means that potentially 1 trillion, that's a 1000,000,000,000 body cells could be transfected with foreign DNA, and and that just I was taken aback by that. So, so 10,000,000,000,000 copies of DNA contamination potentially present per dose, 3 to 10 copies enough to cause incorporation of SV40, DNA contamination into the nuclear genome of the cell thereby causing a mutation which has been identified in cell cultures in chromosomes 9 and 12 including an oncogene that can potentially cause cancer, 10,000,000,000,000 copies per dose or up to that.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(8/57) DR. ANGUS DALGLEISH (PT. 2)—“The Pfizer [injections] are all full of SV40 [and] SV40 was what, in my day, we put into mice to make them grow tumors…” Here is Professor Angus Dalgleish once again, this time in a clip taken from a discussion with Charles Kovess et al. from December of 2024. Dalgleish notes the following: "It's obvious talking to everybody and all the presentations I've been to....[that] they're [the COVID injections] all completely contaminated. They're just not fit for purpose," Dalgleish says. "The Pfizer [injections] are all full of SV40 [and] SV40 was what, in my day, we put into mice to make them grow tumors so we could pour chemotherapy into them to see if it worked for the tumors. And we are putting this into humans for a disease that hasn't killed anybody for at least two years. It is beyond belief, and that's really what I cannot understand."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The recent discussions in Australia highlight serious concerns about messenger RNA vaccines, particularly those from Pfizer, which are reportedly contaminated with SV 40, a substance previously used in animal studies for tumor growth. This raises alarming questions about their safety, especially since COVID-19 hasn't posed a significant threat in over two years. Additionally, a deal between the Australian Prime Minister and Moderna for a ten-year supply of vaccines, costing 2 billion Australian dollars and intended for children, is particularly troubling. The implications of using gene therapy in this manner are deeply concerning, and there is a call for accountability from those behind these vaccine manufacturers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's obvious talking to everybody and all the presentations I've been to Australia and since I've come back and that magnificent, that Perth conference, with the, the the debate with the, premier of Western Australia and the head of the medicine there who didn't turn up to the debate and which I thought was was a very funny thing, but they got all the evidence that the messenger RNA vaccines there, they're all completely contaminated. They are just not fit for purpose. The Pfizer's are all full of SV 40. SV 40 was what in in my day, we put into mice to make them grow tumors so we could pour chemotherapy into them to see if it worked for the tumors. And we are putting this into humans for a disease that hasn't killed anybody for at least 2 years. It is beyond belief, and that's really what I cannot understand. Now today, I got sent something from Australia, which and I must say it's the closest I have to being holding my stomach and being sick. It was, Arace Morrison, the prime minister, doing a deal with Moderna for messenger RNA vaccines for the next 10 years that you will buy 2,000,000,000 Australian dollars of these vaccines off the next 10 years, and they will target all sorts of diseases, and they will be given to children. This is a a gene therapy that they didn't. How much were they bribed to do that because I must say, if I was given a $1,000,000,000 to do this and it meant it going into children, I would walk away even if it was 10,000,000. To me, it's beyond belief that you would even consider it. These people behind Moderna and Pfizer are just pure pure evil, and they must be held to account.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(9/57) DR. SUCHARIT BHAKDI—“The integration of any foreign gene into your chromosome can cause cancer immediately.” Sucharit Bhakdi, a retired Professor Emeritus of Medical Microbiology and Immunology and former Chair of the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, describes in this clip taken from a conversation with Children’s Health Defense from May 2023 how the integration of foreign genes into a person’s genome can lead to cancer. Bhakdi notes that mRNA injections cause this type of damage because “the [DNA] plasmids, these foreign genes derived from bacteria, stolen from bacteria, enter the human cells, and…every cell that is genetically altered is doomed.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Integrating foreign genes into chromosomes can lead to cancer, inflammation, and permanent genetic changes passed to offspring. This is a warning about the dangers posed by RNA vaccines being introduced globally by organizations like the WHO, CDC, and FDA. The initial vaccines are already causing harm due to the introduction of foreign genes into the body. The production of mRNA does not ensure that these bacterial genes will not enter human cells, resulting in genetic alteration. Every genetically altered cell faces dire consequences.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The integration of any foreign gene into your chromosome can cause cancer immediately, can cause all sorts of inflammation, and moreover, will cause this gene to be transmitted to your offspring. You will be genetically transformed forever. This is not a hate speech. This is a speech to make everyone wake up and see the dangers that they are facing because the WHO and the CDC and the FDA and all these guys up there are planning to introduce RNA vaccines worldwide everywhere and the first have already been introduced and they are causing the same damage that all the others are going to cause because a foreign gene is entering your body and because the production of this mRNA will never never guarantee that plasmids, these foreign genes derived from bacteria, stolen from bacteria, enter the human cells and what this means is that all humans who are injected with these bacterial plasmids or genes are genetically altered. And every cell that is genetically altered is doomed.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(10/57) KEVIN MCKERNAN (Pt. 2)—“This SV40 component…it interacts with P53 [which] is [the] guardian of the genome that’s supposed to keep our genome intact…[and] it’s the most cited gene in cancer.” In this clip from an interview Kevin McKernan did with Bret Weinstein, he notes that the SV40—which has been firmly established as being present in the DNA plasmid contamination in the COVID injections—interacts with P53, a gene that is commonly referred to as “the guardian of the genome.” “This SV40 component…it interacts with P53 [which] is [the] guardian of the genome that’s supposed to keep our genome intact,” McKernan says. “And now we have billions of these molecules being injected that we know interact with that.” Furthermore, McKernan adds that P53 is “the most cited gene in cancer,” and “if you mess with P53, you’re inviting cancer, particularly if you shut it down.” The scientist also notes that simply having fragmented DNA inside the cytosol of cells—that is, the liquid portion of the cytoplasm within a cell, where many biochemical reactions occur—is enough to cause cancer; meaning the DNA doesn’t even need to be imported into the nucleus of the cell. “It [the plasmids] doesn’t have to get into the nucleus to cause cancer. Just cytosolic presence of DNA like this can trigger this cGAS STING pathway,” McKernan notes. (The cGAS-STING pathway is an innate immune signaling route that detects cytosolic DNA to trigger an immune response, including inflammation and an antiviral defense.)

Video Transcript AI Summary
The SV40 component, highlighted by David Dean and others, interacts with p53, known as the "guardian of the genome," crucial for maintaining DNA integrity. The introduction of billions of these molecules raises concerns about their effects, especially since they bind to p53. Research from the Brown Cancer Institute suggests that the spike protein may alter p53 transcription, potentially leading to cancer if p53 is compromised. Damaged DNA fragments can trigger the cGAS-STING pathway, signaling danger within cells and potentially leading to oncogenesis. There is skepticism about whether this DNA enters the nucleus, but even its presence in the cytosol can be harmful. Observations of rare cancers in vaccinated children, particularly blood cancers like lymphoma, raise alarms about these potential risks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This SV 40 component, that David Dean has published on being a gene therapy tool, it's also been published by David, I'm sorry, by Draymond et al, which, shows that it interacts with p 53. So p 53 is this guardian of the genome that's supposed to keep our genome intact. And now we have billions of these molecules being injected that we don't interact with that. Now we don't know what it does from the literature that's out there today. We just know that it it binds to p 53. We have, Walthak Aldeyary's work out of the Brown Cancer Institute showing that the spike protein itself may alter the the transcription of p 53. So there's a couple You wanna describe what p53 is when you say guardian of the genome? Yeah. So this is probably the most cited gene in cancer. And if you mess with p53, you're inviting cancer, particularly if you shut it down. This clean this mops up DNA that's been damaged. And now you're you're you're injecting your cells with these, shreds shrapnel DNA that that triggers that pathway. That triggers what's known as a c gas sting pathway, which is a pathway that when it sees broken DNA like that, interferon goes off being like there's something wrong here. We shouldn't have fragmented DNA inside the cytosol or in the nucleus. And that that pathway alone, if you trigger enough repeatedly, can lead to oncogenesis. So there there is a lot of, debunkers out there that try to say you can't prove this DNA is getting into the nucleus based on David Dean's work. We it doesn't have to get into the nucleus to cause cancer. It's just cytosolic presence of fragments of DNA like this can trigger this, cGAST thing pathway. So I've been trying to turn people's attention to cancer mainly because I'm seeing it. I I know kids that shouldn't have cancer because they got vaccinated. And, these are these are very rare cancers that you don't find in children, that are showing up for in close proximity to to usually blood cancers like lymphoma.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(11/57) DR. JANCI LINDSAY— “LNPs have been found to cause cancer cells that are already present to more readily spread by inducing endothelial leakiness.” In this clip from a presentation given for the World Council for Health, posted in 2023, toxicologist and molecular biologist Dr. Janci Linsday describes the nine (or more) ways the mRNA COVID injections can cause cancer. In her presentation, Lindsay notes that: –the injections use lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), which have been found to cause cancer cells that are already present to spread more readily –the LNPs may be oncogenic by themselves –the SV40 is a “super promoter” that is “great at driving gene expression,” and should it sit above an oncogene, you could have “an amplification of a cancer gene.” –the spike protein can interact with, and suppress, P53, the aforementioned “guardian of the genome.” –the injections can produce “frame shifted” proteins, which are aberrant and can themselves cause cancer –the mRNA in the injections itself can reverse transcribe into the genome, in turn causing insertional mutagenesis and cancer –the injections cause immunosuppression of T cells, which, in turn, can damage the immune system and lead to cancer (as previously mentioned in the thread)

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are several potential ways that lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) and mRNA can induce cancer. LNPs can transfect various cells, including hematopoietic stem cells, and may promote the spread of existing cancer cells. The SV40 elements in plasmids can drive gene expression, potentially amplifying oncogenes. The spike protein can inhibit tumor suppressor protein p53, and insertional mutagenesis can create aberrant proteins leading to cancer. mRNA can reverse transcribe to DNA, integrating into the genome, particularly in the ovaries and testes. Immunosuppression of T cells can allow cancer to expand. Concerns exist about the potential for genetic vaccines to be passed to offspring through germ cells, but this has not been adequately investigated. Integration into gametes could lead to genomic changes, raising the risk of cancer rather than functional integration.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the 9 potential ways to induce cancer or more, 1, the lipid nanoparticles themselves can take mRNA and DNA to all cells. And they've been shown to readily transfect hematopoietic stem cells. LNPs have also been found to cause cancer cells that are already present to more readily spread by inducing endothelial leakiness. There may also be an oncogenic effect of the LMPs themselves, which has not yet been studied. As Kevin said, there are s v 40 elements to the plasmids. This is extremely concerning, particularly because they were not disclosed to regulators. So the s p 40 promoter is very promiscuous. It's a super promoter. It's it's great at driving gene expression. If and if that should sit above an oncogene, of course, you could have, an an explosion of an ample amplification in a cancer gene. The s v forty enhancer region, the nuclear targeting sequence, as Kevin described, also takes the DNA to the nucleus within a very short time period. It is designed to do that so that you get effective, gene therapy, gene, insertional, gene therapy. So the spike protein itself, can also interact with and inhibit the tumor suppressor protein p53 that was shown pretty early on. And then plasma DNA does not need to have the SV 40 sequences in order to, be able to cause insertional mutagenesis and to go to the nucleus. There are lots of proteins that assist in carrying and binding to and carrying that exogenous DNA to the nucleus where it can then be integrated. So insertional metagenesis can cause something called frameshift mutations, which also lead to aberrant proteins being made. Those aberrant proteins can also lead to cancer. MRNA itself can be reverse transcribed to DNA, and then also integrate in the genome, which causes cancers. And this is particularly true in the ovaries and the testes where line 1 is more, reverse transcriptase is more constitutively expressed. So that's a real concern there. RNA, through through a mechanism that I'll go through, coming up, can also be reverse transcribed to DNA and then that DNA back to RNA and then to cDNA, and and then be passed on. There's another mechanism called or there's another mechanism through which these could cause cancer, and that is through immunosuppression of t cells of the t cells, particularly, t cells that that keep cancer from expanding, in these stoichiometric niches where where they guard the cancer clone and keep it from expanding. We see this in our pets as they grow older, that once we have immunosensis and thymic involution, then you see an explosion in these sarcomas and lipomas and other cancers because of this, these T cells not being present to stop clonal expansion. So, there are different types of genetic mutations. There's somatic mutations, which only affect, the cells outside of the gametes. And then there's germline mutations, which affect the gametes. Now, here it says that a somatic mutation cannot result in a hereditary in hereditary passing on. But there is a mechanism through which you can have extra chromosomally passed genetic elements, be passed through sperm. And it is a very interesting mechanism of epigenetic regulation. And that is called sperm mediated gene transfer. Trying to make sure I don't go over here. So, ways to pass on genetic vaccines to progeny through both male and female germ cells. I spoke a little bit about this in, December of 2/22 at the US Senate. My my very large concern that these gene therapies will be passed on to our progeny and will contaminate the gene pool. And this is not being investigated at all. Not a single person has investigated sperm or ova to see if these are being genetically integrated. And I have reached out to multiple labs asking them if they would investigate this. We have an in vitro lab that is willing to work with anyone who, is willing to test both Sperminova for, for integration. So, in the first, you can have integration into the genome directly of gametes, from the DNA based vaccines or through reverse transcription of RNA, into the coding DNA. And, of course, the DNA plasmid sequences then make that possible as well. We know that these go to the testes and ovaries, and we know that they can be taken up there, and and integrated into the gametes. Genomic integration could result in cancers rather than just, functional integration. In fact, it's it's unlikely that we will have functional integration, into the genome creating a spike protein, but more likely that you'll have insertable mutagenesis leading to cancer.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(12/57) KEVIN MCKERNAN (Pt. 3)—“We have sequencing from a colon [tumor] biopsy from a patient who was four [4] times vaccinated…we can find [Pfizer-injection DNA] plasmids in there at a hundred copies per cell.” In this clip from a 2024 Mind & Matter podcast, we hear again from scientist Kevin McKernan, who describes finding the DNA plasmids from Pfizer’s mRNA COVID injection in a colon tumor from a—now deceased—individual who received four injections. ​​”We have sequencing from a colon biopsy from a patient who was four [4] times vaccinated. A year after vaccination, they had a colon cancer. They biopsied it that day, and then 30 days later, they died, and then they biopsied after, and we have sequencing on both the pre-mortem and post-mortem samples," McKernan says. The scientist and entrepreneur, often cited as the first person to find DNA contamination in the mRNA COVID injections, adds, "we can find plasmids in there a hundred copies per cell. They're not exactly the same as Pfizer's, which is a real head-scratcher, but they're in there." McKernan goes on to say: “The copy number alone suggests that these things aren't fully fragmented. Right? These plasmids really shouldn't be replicating to a hundred copies per cell." McKernan adds, "They shouldn't be in there at that level because if you just do the math on how much is in the vaccine, when you do an injection of this, this person has four vaccines...1.2 ml of Pfizer...went into about 87,000 mls [of] body volume. So you should have a massive dilution into your body. Yet when we're sequencing this and doing qPCR off the tumor, the CTs coming back off the tumor are almost as high as they are straight out of the vial."

Video Transcript AI Summary
We have sequenced samples from a colon biopsy of a patient who was vaccinated four times and developed colon cancer a year later. The sequencing revealed plasmids, with about 100 copies per cell, which differ from Pfizer's. This raises questions about potential variations in manufacturing or contamination. Preliminary data suggests these plasmids may integrate into the genome, with one integration observed on chromosome 21 affecting a cancer-related gene. The high copy number indicates replication, as the expected dilution from vaccination would not account for such levels. The formalin-fixed tissue confirms these plasmids were present while the patient was alive, but the source remains unknown.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have done that. We haven't published the work yet, but we have sequencing from a colon, a colon biopsy from a patient who was 4 times vaccinated. A year after vaccination, they had a colon cancer. They biopsied it that day, and then 30 days later, they died, and then they biopsied after. And we have sequencing on both the the pre mortem and post mortem samples. And we can find plasmids in there a 100 copies per cell. They're they're not exactly the same as Pfizer's, which is a real head scratcher, but they're in there. And there's 2 of them. And there's there's a one encodes spike and one encodes nucleocapsid. We don't know why where the hell the nucleocapsid ones come from. Speaker 1: But if they got there from a Pfizer vaccination, why would the plasma be different than the Pfizer plasmid? Speaker 0: So that's a good question. Is do they have more than 1 in circulation? Like, is BioNTech got a different manufacturing plasmid than than the manufacturing plant out here in the US? Because they're making these in 2 different locations. Yep. It's possible. Is there contamination in their laboratory that, in the manufacturing of this, they get the wrong plasmid in their Erykolai pad, and suddenly they've got a different background there. Is there this possibility from the Beck paper I described in Seattle? Is that in play? And we've gotta do everything in our end to make sure we didn't introduce it, which we're doing. We're running all types of experiments to show that there's spike expression going on. Speaker 1: But there's any there's any number of reasons that could explain this. Speaker 0: Yes. Yeah. Yeah. So, but we also have data preliminarily back that's looking we run this program called ISLING. It's a really cool program that that's designed to look for vector integration into genomes, because they have to do this for a lot of gene therapy projects. And if you run that that program on on the on the sample, it does pop out a lot of integration events that we're now in the process of saying about verifying just to confirm that they're real. Speaker 1: So you guys are looking at and confirming whether these DNA plasmids are actually not only getting into human cells, but integrating into the nuclear genome. Speaker 0: Yes. Yeah. So we've got, you know, we've got a case now that that we're zeroing in on that looks like the SV 40 poly a signal, which is a termination signal. It's a transcription termination signal. We've got a piece of that integrating into chromosome 21, and it's breaking a gene that's involved in cancer. So, that that that one looks really interesting. Like, that could be maybe the driver of this whole thing. But the the program spits out a long list of potential integrations that we have to go through and and verify which ones are real and which ones are artifacts and all that. So I I wanna get ahead of ourselves on that. That's that hasn't been saying or verified yet. But, there the copy number alone is, suggests that these things aren't fully fragmented. Right? That these these plasmas really shouldn't be replicating to a 100 copies per cell. They couldn't they shouldn't be in there at that level, because if you just do the math on how much is in the vaccine Mhmm. After when you do an injection of of this this person has 4 vaccines, so 1.2 ml of Pfizer. That went into about 87,000 ml as your body volume. So you should have a massive dilution into your body. Yet when we're sequencing this and doing qPCR off the tumor, the CTs coming back off the tumor are almost as high as they are straight out of the vial. Yeah. Speaker 1: So basically what you're saying is in this case where you've got these biopsied cells from a tumor, you're finding on the order of a 100 copies of this DNA plasmid per cell. And in theory, if it is coming if the if you're just sort of injecting some with a jab, it's got these DNA contaminants, you should find many fewer than a 100 copies of plasmid per cell that's coming directly from the jab. So and so I think what you're implying is that this high number, a 100 or so per cell, implies that perhaps the cell itself replicated multiple copies of these. Speaker 0: Yes. Yeah. And I and even if it were an integration event, which I I do think there could be 2 things going on here. There there could be plasmids replicating episomally, and there could be parts of them integrated. But if it were purely integrated and the plasma was gone, we would not expect to see the copy number of what integrated to be higher than the copy number of the genome. Right? You'd get one integration into 1 chromosome probably, so it would be half the signal of what you get amplifying a human house gene like RNA p, which is what we use. You would get, you know, a similar CT if it integrated, because because if it were driver mutation, the the cells would take off, and it would maybe have one copy of that mutation with it. And as a tumor advanced, you would probably you expect to see a CT score in PCR for that region that was similar to the actual genome background, but we're not seeing that. We're seeing CTs that are that are way ahead. You know, if it's a 100 fold up there, it's around 6 to 7 CTs ahead of the RNA p gene, which is the human gene. And then when we do sequencing, we see the same thing. The coverage of sequencing is, like, 100 to 200 x in the plasmid is that when we're at 1x of the human genome. So they're they're in this tumor at really high levels, and that that tells us that it has to be replicating. And this was a formalin fixed tissue, so like it's not like we could sprinkle plasmids on it from our laboratory to contaminate that and have them be trans translationally active. Right? Yeah. Formalin is like this process when you take a tissue and you formalin fix it. It's like think of it as like carbon freezing Han Solo. Right. Right. Right. A nerd. Alright? So you can't add plasmid after the fact and get it to replicate on cells, and you can't add plasmids on the fact afterwards and get it to integrate. Like, the the those those things can only occur if the cells are live. So we're pretty certain we've we've ruled out that, alright, this isn't coming from us. The anti vaxxers aren't pouring plasmids on this great story. Okay? Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 0: This is this was this has this has certain biological signals that show this this was present in the patient when they were alive. We don't know the source of it. They were 4 times vaccinated, and one of the vaccines that they used, was one of the earliest vaccines from December 30, 2020.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(13/57) RETIRED PHARMA R&D EXECUTIVE SASHA LATYPOVA— “The FDA was fully aware that these things would cause cancer because they’ve written numerous guidance documents [saying so]; that’s how they regulate industry.” In this clip from an interview with Dr. Drew from 2024, retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova describes how the "FDA was fully aware that these things [the COVID injections] would cause cancer, because they've written numerous guidance documents [saying so]; that's how they regulate industry.” Latypova notes that in “2015, 2013, even more recently than that, they wrote extensive guidance documents explaining to manufacturers who wanted to develop mRNA products that they need to study...cancer..." "They had this knowledge and they told manufacturers you have to study these risks and you have to exclude them and they were also not allowed to even study it in healthy volunteers because it was considered unethical," Latypova adds. "It was considered too dangerous. So then we come to 2020 [and] all of the sudden all of this is solved—this is a joke. To me, that's where I became extremely suspicious..." One such FDA guidance document referenced by Latypova is linked in tweet 39 of this mega-thread.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I recently met someone whose 18-year-old daughter developed cancer after receiving the Pfizer vaccine. I've heard from many parents who lost children to these injections, some experiencing immediate and horrific deaths. They repeatedly share their stories with lawmakers, highlighting a significant crime that must end. The FDA was aware of the potential cancer risks associated with these vaccines, as outlined in guidance documents from 2013 and 2015. These documents instructed manufacturers to study risks like cancer, fertility issues, and cardiovascular problems, and deemed it unethical to test on healthy volunteers. Yet, by 2020, these concerns were seemingly overlooked. This raises serious suspicions about the intentions behind the vaccine rollout, suggesting a premeditated crime where regulators and the military may have colluded with pharmaceutical companies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I just had a guest in my house whose 18 year old daughter was injected with Pfizer, and she has cancer. I sat across numerous people who lost their children to these injections. Some died immediately. Some deaths were gruesome. And these people have to go and testify to lawmakers and anybody who would listen and recount the story over and over and over again. And this is a a massive, massive crime, and it needs to stop. Now FDA was fully aware that these things will cause cancer because they've written numerous guidance documents. That's how they regulate industry. So even in 2015, and I read those guidance documents, 2015, 2013, even more recently than that, they wrote extensive guidance documents explaining to the manufacturers who wanted to develop mRNA products That they need to study, especially cancer, that these products can cause death, that these products can cause fertility issues, blindness, strokes, cardiovascular issues, all of that is written because that's called regulatory knowledge. They have this knowledge. And they told manufacturers, you have to study these risks and you have to exclude them. And they were also not allowed to even study it in healthy volunteers because it was considered unethical. It was considered too dangerous. So then we come to 2020, all of a sudden all of this is solved. This is a joke, okay? So to me, that's where I became extremely suspicious and started looking into it for myself. But that's what I'm telling you. It's a premeditated crime, regulators knew, and the military conducted this fake exercise to capture all these pharma companies and make them make these weapons.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(14/57) DR. JAMES ROYLE— “In addition to the increase in all-cause excess deaths in highly vaccinated countries since the gene based–injectable rollout, there has been observed an alarming and significant increase in cancers.” In this 2024 presentation for the Stone Summit, U.K.-based surgeon Dr. James Royle describes seeing the same kinds of phenomena regarding turbo cancers as described by Professor Angus Dalgleish, Dr. Ryan Cole, Dr. Ute Krüger, et al. He also notes that the excuses for these cancers that have been used to deflect away from the COVID injections as the cause don’t make any logical sense. “In addition to the increase in all-cause excess deaths in highly vaccinated countries since the gene-based injectable rollout, there has been observed an alarming and significant increase in cancers,” Royle says. “These cancers have been termed colloquially ‘turbo cancers.’ Obviously, this is not a scientific term, but reflects the different aggressive biological nature that seems to be being observed by the public as well as clinicians…There was [also] a clear, dramatic increase [in cancer rates] that occurred in 2021 shortly after the rollout.” Royle goes on to note the following: “A robust study recently published from Japan now [retracted] by the journal after significant pressure showed cancer-related excess mortality in vaccinated populations. Cancer is being observed within all ages. It is my assertion shared by many experts oncologists and clinical colleagues around the world that the cancers we are seeing are extremely aggressive and are of a different biology. One study showed this dramatic increase, particularly in younger ages through 2021, [and in] 2022, [a] 7.9% increase.” The surgeon adds: “I've noticed aggressive widespread recurrences in previously successfully treated bowel cancer cases that I'd considered cured. Many metastases in these cases are unusual or atypical. Middle aged and elderly people are presenting with out-of-the-blue aggressive stage IV colorectal cancer who are incurable and die within weeks or months. In many of these cases, the entire liver appears to be filled with large, round tumor masses.” The prominent surgeon notes that “many of [his] multidisciplinary team colleagues, fellow surgeons, oncologists, pathologists, radiologists and specialist nurses have all acknowledged… [a] sudden change in patterns and [a] dramatic increase in these aggressive incurable advanced cancers…observed in these past two years. However, none of them can offer an explanation.” “This post-2021 increase cannot be explained by a sudden population-wide change in environmental toxins,” Royle notes. “Ultra-processed foods are not new. We already had an obesity epidemic prior to COVID-19,” the surgeon adds. “In any case, there is no valid argument that the increase is due to stopping [cancer] screening given we are seeing a particular increase in cancers in much younger people, 20 to 45 years of age. Screening services for colorectal cancer and breast and others typically start at 60 years [of age].”

Video Transcript AI Summary
There has been a concerning rise in aggressive colorectal cancers, termed "turbocancers," particularly after the rollout of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. This increase is observed across all age groups, with a notable spike in younger patients. The aggressive nature of these cancers is unusual, especially in elderly patients who typically present with operable stages. Various explanations, such as lifestyle factors and delayed diagnoses due to lockdowns, do not account for the sudden changes seen post-2021. A correlation exists between the vaccine rollout and the rise in cancer cases, suggesting potential mechanisms related to immunosuppression and other biological disruptions. Despite reporting these observations, feedback from health authorities has been minimal. Many healthcare professionals share similar concerns but hesitate to voice them due to fear of repercussions. There is a growing consensus that the vaccines may not be safe or effective, and calls for their cessation are increasing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Finally, I need to talk about cancer, particularly colorectal cancers. In addition to the increase in all cause excess deaths in highly vaccinated countries since the gene based injectable rollout, there has been observed an alarming and significant increase in cancers. These cancers have been termed colloquially turbocancers. Obviously, this is not a scientific term, but reflects the different aggressive biological nature that seems to be being observed by the public as well as clinicians. Despite recent articles claiming that the sudden growth in cancers is not new, such as the Gaslighting article in the Daily Mail reporting on a baffling increase in trend in data from 1990 to 2019. There was a clear dramatic increase that occurred in 2021 shortly after the rollout. A robust study recently published from Japan, now redacted by the journal after significant pressure, showed cancer related excess mortality in vaccinated populations. Cancer is being observed within all ages. It is my assertion shared by many experts oncologists and clinical colleagues around the world that the cancers we are seeing are extremely aggressive and are of a different biology. One study showed this dramatic increase, particularly in younger ages through 2021, 5.6% increase, 2022, a 7.9% increase. I've noticed aggressive widespread recurrences in previously successfully treated bowel cancer cases that I consider cured. Many metastases in these cases are unusual or atypical. Middle aged and elderly people are presenting with out of the blue aggressive stage 4 colorectal cancer who are incurable and die within weeks or months. In many of these cases, the entire liver appears to be filled with large round tumor masses. It is horrific to see on a weekly basis in IMBT. In my experience, it is rare for colorectal cancer to be as aggressive in elderly. Usually, sporadic cancers that are diagnosed are still operable when they present. Elderly patients rarely present with stage IV disease and certainly not in the way I've started seeing. Recently, we've seen 3 patients presenting with synchronous cancers, that is 2 separate bowel cancers in different areas of the colon presenting at the same time. This was previously considered rare, less than 3%. 1 of 1 was middle aged, otherwise fit well with 2 bulky, locally invasive cancers, and one was very elderly with 2 primary cancers and liver metastases. Many of my multidisciplinary team colleagues, fellow surgeons, oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, and specialist nurses, have all acknowledged to me the sudden change in patterns and dramatic increase in these aggressive incurable advanced cancers that we've observed in these past 2 years. However, none of them can offer an explanation. Various theories have been suggested. So what then is causing the sudden increased incidence in the other 92% that we're seeing? Number 2, Western ultra processed diet obesity and sedentary lifestyles. Whilst these things have undoubtedly played a major role in the steady increase in cancer over the past 3 to 4 decades, they do not explain the post 2021 sudden increase and change in biology, aggressive nature. This post 2021 increase cannot be explained by a sudden population wide change in environmental toxins. Ultra processed foods are not new. We already had an obesity epidemic prior to COVID 19. Number 3, lockdowns causing delayed diagnosis and suspended cancer screening programs. The post 2021 surge in aggressive cancers in all ages cannot be blamed on lockdown and delayed diagnosis. As I showed earlier, during the 19 the COVID 19 pandemic, we did not stop our 2 week wait for colorectal pathways. We diagnosed and treated more rather than fewer cancers during lockdown as the only pathway that GPs can access. Therefore, this argument of stage migration or missed or delayed diagnosis does not hold true for colorectal cancer. Furthermore, colorectal screening services were only stopped for a few months of the first and second wave. In any case, there is no valid argument that the increase is due to stopping screening, given we are seeing a particular increase in cancers in much younger people, 20 to 45 years of age. Screening services for colorectal cancer and breast and others typically start at 60 years. Number 4, there's a close temporal association of the increasing cancers and the rollout of population wide mRNA COVID 19 genetic injections. The evident correlation fulfills the majority of the 9 Bradford Hill epidemiological criteria for causation. There are multiple plausible mechanisms that have been proposed by which cancer could be induced or potentiated, accelerated by the mRNA gene injections, including unacceptably high levels of bacterial plasmid contamination, the discovery of the SV40 tumor promoter, disruption of the p53 tumor suppressor, etcetera. These mechanisms are discussed widely by scientists and clinicians, such as doctor Kevin McKernan, professor Angliss Douglies, doctor William Mackis, and doctor Ryan Cole, a US pathologist, and many others and have been discussed on numerous international calls. More generally, the shots are clearly causing generalized immunosuppression. The immune system is grossly underestimated its complexity and importance in tumor surveillance in destroying mutated cells before they become cancers. Recently, other doctors have told me how they are seeing sudden recurrences of cancers that have been cured 10 or even 15 years earlier. I submitted over 20 yellow cards from June 2021. I could have submitted many more, but it was becoming very apparent that the MHRA was ignoring the data. I've never been given any feedback on any analysis of my cases or even acknowledgment, except the 2 or 3 cases where further clarifying information that I'd already provided was requested. I was given no information back from the MHRA to indicate that they were looking at yellow card data or analyzing it. Despite this, the safety signal from both the MHRA and the VAERS system in the United States is unprecedented and undeniably obvious. Presenting this information formally, I've received mixed responses. More recently, in my more departmental morbidity and mortality meetings, there's been a more open acknowledgment that perhaps some observed events, such as ischemic bowel cases, may have been related to vaccines. I've had a number of conversations with 2 colorectal colleagues in other areas of the country who've had similar shared experiences. They're in agreement with the observed patterns of thrombotic, infective and inflammatory, and malignant disease. I've had the opportunity to give a presentation to an international surgical meeting in London in March 2023. At the end, I was congratulated on my perceived courage in standing up and speaking about these concerns. There was general agreement in the room, 30 or more surgeons. Many offered acknowledgment and similar observations, but had been unwilling to raise their concerns for fear of repercussions. In fact, a rather alarmed, eminent, retired surgeon present stated it was our duty to raise these concerns. In conclusion, the data are clear that COVID 19 vaccines are neither effective or safe. My own personal observations have been increasingly backed up by other data around the world and research studies as well as expert opinion in other centers. I personally demand that these injections and any promotion of them be stopped with immediate effect. Thank you for your attention.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(15/57) DR. WILLIAM MAKIS— “Once the vaccines roll out in 2021, you see a statistically significant rise in cancer, and it rises every single year since then…there’s some kind of damage that…can manifest years after you’ve had your last COVID vaccines.” In this clip from a discussion with pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas, oncologist, radiologist, and cancer researcher Dr. William Makis describes some of the work that’s been done by The Ethical Skeptic on cancer trends following the rollout of the COVID injections. Makis notes that there was a “statistically significant rise in cancer” in the U.S. following the rollout of the COVID injections. Furthermore, he says that the injections cause “some kind of damage that…can manifest years after you’ve had your last COVID vaccines.” "I love the work of Ethical Skeptic, and this is his work," Makis says of the graph he presents for Thomas. "This is a data analyst on X...and he looks at CDC data, and he finds these trends that are really fascinating." "These are deaths from malignant neoplasms in...a younger cohort, ages 0 to 54," Makis says. "And you see that really, in 2020, you don't see much in terms of a [rise in] cancer. There seems to be a slight blip above trend line, but it's sort of still hovering around a long-term trend line. And then once the vaccines roll out in 2021, then you see a statistically significant rise in cancer, and it rises every single year since then." Ethical Skeptic "calls it a 12-sigma event, which is...I'm not even gonna try to describe what that means, how astronomically unlikely this is to be a sort of a random thing or a coincidence," Makis says. "This is a very real trend. I'm seeing it in thousands and thousands of young people," the cancer researcher adds. "And what's shocking and what's particularly concerning about this graph—and I really want people to pay attention to this—is that people stopped taking booster shots. People have, by and large, stopped taking booster shots. But the trend continues. And it's a very steady upward trend. There's no sign of it leveling off or stopping, or reversing. And this has me really, really concerned for the long term." Makis goes on to say: "Initially, I started seeing these patterns...Someone would take a COVID vaccine and then they would be diagnosed with a stage 4 cancer out of the blue four months later, six months later. And I thought, 'Okay. Well, maybe there's a pattern here. Maybe there's a sort of a certain time that's required for cancer to develop.' And through my research, I found, for example, that there is a shift in the type of antibodies that we produce. It's called the IgG4 shift. And IgG4 antibodies start being produced once you've been exposed to multiple shots, once you've had at least two COVID vaccines. And these are called tolerance antibodies. This is where your...immune system starts tolerating the antigen, which is the spike protein; but it also starts tolerating cancer and cancer cells. And that takes a few months. That whole shift takes several months to happen. "But then I start[ed] seeing cases where the young person hasn't taken a shot in the last two years, then they're just suddenly diagnosed with an aggressive stage 4 cancer that behaves the way these mRNA vaccine–induced turbo cancers are behaving, and they [the patients] have a very, very poor prognosis. They don't respond to chemotherapy or radiation therapy or even immunotherapy, and then they die approximately six to 12 months after diagnosis. So there is a long-term effect, and that is the one thing that really has me concerned...that there is something that happens to people who've had the vaccines that is permanent. There's some kind of damage that appears to be permanent, and it can manifest years after you've had your last COVID vaccines. And this is really, really, concerning for me."

Video Transcript AI Summary
A recent analysis of CDC data shows a concerning trend in cancer deaths among individuals aged 0 to 54. Before 2020, cancer rates were stable, but after the rollout of COVID vaccines in 2021, there has been a statistically significant rise in cancer cases each year. This trend persists despite a decrease in booster vaccinations, suggesting potential long-term effects from the initial vaccines. Observations indicate that some individuals develop aggressive stage 4 cancers months after vaccination, with poor responses to treatment. Research indicates a shift in antibody production, which may lead to the immune system tolerating both the spike protein and cancer cells. This raises concerns about permanent damage from the vaccines that could manifest years later.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You have an, slide, I believe, that shows the trend in cancer. We maybe we should put that up, and then you can kind of share with our audience, what you're seeing here on this on this image. Speaker 1: You know, this is I love the work of ethical skeptic, and and this is, his work. This is a data analyst, on on x on Twitter, and he looks at CDC data, and and he he finds these these trends that are really fascinating. And and so he had released, his analysis recently about cancer. He puts this out every couple of months. And this is the trend that he's put out. These are deaths from malignant neoplasms and younger this is a younger cohort, ages 0 to 54. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: And and you see that really in 2020, you don't see much in terms of a can a rising cancer. There seems to be a slight blip above, you know, trend line, but it's sort of it's still hovering around a long term trend line. And then once the vaccines roll out in 2021, then you see a statistically significant rise in cancer, and it rises every single year since then. I mean and he calls it a 12 sigma event, which is, you know, I mean, I'm not even gonna try to describe what, you know, what that means, how astronomically unlikely this is to be a sort of a random thing or or a coincidence. This is a very real trend. I'm seeing it in 1,000 and 1,000 of of young people. And and what's what's shocking and what's particularly concerning about this graph, and I really, you know, want people to pay attention to this, is that people stop taking booster shots. People have, by and large, stopped taking Right. Speaker 0: But the trend continues. Speaker 1: But the trend continues. And it's a very steady upward trend. There's no sign of it leveling off or stopping, or reversing. And this has me really, really concerned, for the long term. Speaker 0: Yeah. That point you just made to me means and correct me if I'm wrong. I'm just sort of thinking it through. A lot of people aren't taking the boosters anymore. So the risk has to have come from the prior vaccines they got, maybe even 2, 3 years ago, speaking to speaking to the fact that it has perhaps permanently harmed our immune systems, those those people who have taken those jabs. Speaker 1: Exactly. And so initially, I started seeing these patterns. You know? Someone would take a COVID vaccine, and then they would be diagnosed with a stage 4 cancer out of the blue 4 months later, 6 months later. And I thought, okay, well maybe there's a pattern here. Maybe there's a sort of a certain time that's required for cancer to develop. And and, you know, through my research, I found, for example, that there is a shift in the type of antibodies that we produce. It's called the IgG4 shift. And, you know, IgG4 antibodies start being produced once you've been exposed to multiple shots, once you've had at least 2 COVID vaccines. And these are called tolerance antibodies. This is where your body starts the immune system starts tolerating the antigen, which is, you know, the the spike protein, but it also starts tolerating cancer and cancer cells. And that takes a few months. That whole shift, you know, takes several months to to happen. But then, you know, I start seeing also cases where the young person hasn't taken a shot in the last 2 years. Then they're, you know, just suddenly diagnosed with an aggressive stage 4 cancer that behaves the way these mRNA vaccine induced turbocancers are behaving and they have a very, very poor prognosis. They don't respond to chemotherapy or radiation therapy or even immunotherapy and then they die approximately 6 to 12 months after diagnosis. So there is a long term effect. And that is the one that really has me concerned is that there is something that happens to people who've had the vaccines that is permanent. There's some kind of damage that appears to be permanent, and and it can manifest years after you've had your last COVID vaccines and and this is really really concerning for me.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(16/57) DR. CHARLES HOFFE—“In my practice now…approximately two-thirds of all cancer diagnoses—since the vax rollout—are stage 4.” Topping off the first section of this turbo cancer mega-thread, which features expert testimonials from around the Western world, we have a clip of family physician Dr. Charles Hoffe speaking on turbo cancers during a 2022 Children’s Health Defense virtual roundtable. Hoffe, who has more than 30 years of experience as a family physician, notes that “as a family doctor, over the years, a small percentage of the new cancer diagnoses would unfortunately be stage 4 at first diagnosis. But in [his] practice now…approximately two-thirds of all cancer diagnoses since the vax rollout are stage 4.” Hoffe notes, “pathologists around the world have noticed this—that, unfortunately, now people who had previous cancers, which were in remission, are flaring up since their shots because of the damage to their immune system by the COVID shots. [And with] new cancers being diagnosed, the tumors are bigger than ever. They seem to grow very aggressively, spread very aggressively, and be very resistant to treatment. So this has been nicknamed turbo cancer.” The veteran family physician goes on to describe one such case of turbo cancer he’s seen in a man who was mandated to get a COVID injection in order to keep his job. Hoffe shows how the man, a 61-year-old machine operator, developed a grapefruit-sized tumor in his lungs within months of getting his COVID injection. He also developed other tumors, including ones that grew along the vertebrae of his spine. Hoffe notes that the prognosis at the time was that the man would almost certainly die due to the aggressive cancers.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Cancer cases are increasingly being diagnosed at advanced stages, with many patients presenting with stage 4 cancers since the COVID vaccine rollout. One patient, a 61-year-old machine operator, experienced severe shortness of breath after receiving his second vaccine dose. Initially, his chest x-ray was normal, but by September, he developed back pain and underwent further imaging, revealing a grapefruit-sized tumor in his chest and another tumor near his lumbar vertebra. This rapid progression of aggressive tumors, referred to as "turbo cancer," highlights the alarming trend of aggressive cancer growth post-vaccination. Tragically, the patient’s prognosis is very poor, raising concerns about the impact of the vaccines on immune health.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, what we're seeing is also that people are starting to talk about the cancers which are appearing. Doctors are seeing them and also the the number of, of cases of cancer which, you know, are much advanced when they're first recognized and also they have distant spread. It's quite remarkable. Charles, are you seeing something like this in your practice? Speaker 1: Yeah. I in fact, I wanted to talk about one of my own patients. You know, it's it's it's fascinating as a as a family doctor, over the years, a small percentage of the new cancer diagnoses would unfortunately be stage 4 at first diagnosis. But in my practice now, it's approximately 2 thirds of all cancer diagnoses since the vax rollout, are stage 4. And so, you know, pathologists around the world have noticed this that unfortunately now people who had previous cancers which were in remission are flaring up since their shots because of the damage to their immune system by the COVID shots. But new cancers being diagnosed, the tumors are bigger than ever. They seem to grow very aggressively, spread very aggressively and be very resistant to treatment. So this has been nicknamed turbo cancer. So I wanted to just do a quick presentation of a gentleman who's been a patient of mine for about 20 years. So this gentleman is a 61 year old machine operator who was mandated to have the shots for his work. And so November last year, he had a second shot. After that, he complained to me that he was just out of breath, all the time. Just really felt short of breath. Couldn't do what he used to be able to do. I assumed he probably had micro clotting either in his lungs or his heart. So anyway, in December of last year, he was sent off for a chest x-ray, to investigate it. And so the slide on the left is his chest x-ray from December of last year which was completely normal. So then you'll see that this is the progression of events. This year, in September of this year, he started to develop a low back pain that radiated down into his thigh and his buttock that seemed like sciatica. And, he eventually got bad enough that he went into an ER where he had a chest x-ray and a CT scan. So as you remember, he had a normal chest x-ray 1 month after his COVID shot. The chest x-ray on the right hand side which you can you might be able to see, he has got literally a grapefruit sized tumor in the center of his chest. So you can see it right in compare the size, you can see the lung on the left side in the left x-ray, you can see that's what a right lung should look like. Now obviously the patient's right lung is on our left because they're facing us. And so you can see the two lobes of that lung are collapsed and how much smaller that lung is. But he literally has a 4 inch diameter tumor that's displacing his trachea right in the center of his chest that has grown since his first x-ray, which was 10 months before. Now this is astonishing for a primary tumor to grow from being invisible 10 months ago to literally 4 inches or 10 centimeters in diameter in that space of time. Now his back pain was being caused by a secondary which was his first symptoms. He had a 2 and a half inch diameter, a 6 centimeter diameter tumor adjacent to his 4th lumbar vertebra, which was impinging on the nerves and causing his back pain and had caused collapse of that vertebra. So this is a real case of turbocancer tragically in this patient who was mandated to have these shots in order to keep his job and unfortunately now I don't think his chances of surviving this are pretty close to 0. This is a highly aggressive cancer. So this is tragic. It is absolutely tragic. The people were were given these shots to keep them safe and and it is just devastating what this is doing.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(17/57) DR. MICHAEL HUANG—“The clinic I work at, it's about 30 physicians…in the past year, I've learned that two out of the 30 physicians I work with were diagnosed with aggressive advanced cancer, and one of them died because of that.” Starting off our testimonies portion of this turbo-cancer mega-thread, we have Dr. Michael Huang, a family medicine physician in California, describing during a 2024 conversation with Charles Kovess, et al. how he started to see aggressive cancers crop up in his colleagues following the rollout of the COVID injections. Huang tells Kovess, et al.: “I have seen what has happened when my friends have taken the shots. I used to work at Kaiser. It's a large management group. And the clinic I work at, it's about 30 physicians. And, you know, physicians, we are usually trying to stay healthy, trying to avoid harms. We don't smoke. We don't drink. And, unfortunately, in the past year, I've learned that two out of the 30 physicians I work with were diagnosed with aggressive advanced cancer, and one of them died because of that. Almost monthly, I will hear about one or two physicians [who] die suddenly. And most recently, we know this family practice resident who's in his thirties. We have seen him about a month ago, healthy, vibrant, and he suddenly died of advanced gastric cancer and left an unborn child as a result. So we start to see the results of healthcare providers playing Russian Roulette, getting the shots as they're…leading their patients, setting examples, getting their booster shots and getting injured from these experimental vaccines.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
I've lost all my friends during my medical training because they thought I was crazy. In the past year, I've witnessed alarming health issues among my colleagues. Out of 30 physicians at my clinic, two were diagnosed with aggressive cancer, and one died. It's become common to hear about physicians dying suddenly. Recently, a healthy family practice resident in his thirties died from advanced gastric cancer, leaving behind an unborn child. This situation highlights the risks healthcare providers face when they receive these experimental vaccines, which they promote to their patients while potentially suffering serious health consequences themselves.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've lost every friend I had, through my medical training because they everyone thought I was nuts. I was crazy. But in the past year, I have seen what has happened when my friends have taken the shots. I used to work at Kaiser. It's a large, management group. And the clinic I work at, it's about 30 physicians. And, you know, physician, we are usually trying to stay healthy, trying to avoid harms. We don't smoke. We don't drink. And unfortunately, in the past year, I have learned that 2 out of the 30 physician I worked with were diagnosed with aggressive advanced cancer and one of them died, because of that. Almost monthly, I will hear 1 or 2 physician will die suddenly and most recently, we know this, family practice resident who's in his thirties, we have seen him about a month ago, healthy, vibrant, and he suddenly died of, advanced gastric cancer and and left an unborn child as a result. So we start to see the results of health care provider, playing the Russian roulette, getting the shots as their lead leading their physician leading their patients, setting examples, getting their booster shots and getting injured from these experimental vaccines.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(18/57) NURSE DAWN—“This is a huge tumor about the size of a softball behind my eye. And I had [metastases] to the back of my skull and 12 different areas of my bones.” In this clip taken from a 2023 interview with Children’s Health Defense, Dawn, a nurse, describes how she developed cancers throughout her body after receiving two Moderna COVID injections. Dawn describes how the cancer is “muscle-loving,” appearing throughout her body, and did not respond to treatment. Dawn also shows how she developed a “huge tumor about the size of a softball” behind her eye” and had “[metastases] to the back of [her] skull and 12 different areas of [her] bones.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
I received my first Moderna shot in December 2020, followed by a second in January. Shortly after, I experienced severe headaches and vision changes, which I initially attributed to hormonal issues. An ER visit revealed a large tumor behind my eye and metastases in my skull and bones, diagnosed as myelosarcoma. This aggressive cancer is rare, typically found in children and dogs post-vaccination. I went through multiple hospitals before receiving treatment at Moffitt Cancer Center, including a clinical trial, chemotherapy, and radiation. After a few months of remission, the cancer returned in my pancreas, kidney, liver, and shoulder, as it can spread throughout the body.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. So after your 3rd, any injuries or you just Speaker 1: I had cancer at the time. Speaker 0: Oh, you're off your 3rd shot. I thought you said it's 5 months after. Speaker 1: That was after the booster. Okay. So, basically, I got the, first, shot Moderna in 2020 when they first came out at the end of December. And then I got the the other one in January, and then I ended up, having the worst headache of my life with, basically my eye was bulging on my head. It yeah. It was crushing my nasals and basically, it was causing vision changes. Speaker 0: Talk talk us through this. Speaker 1: It was causing vision changes where it was looking like seventies picture where where, like, color fades and everything. And, basically, at that time, my dog also had, like, a infection in his eye, so I was using his eye steroids. Speaker 0: So I thought it was just like a regular eye thing, and I checked into the ER. And that's how Speaker 1: I found out I had cancer. And basically Speaker 0: So what are we looking at here? These are your eyes. Speaker 1: Those are my eyes. This is a huge tumor about the size of a softball behind my eye, and I had METs to the back of my skull and 12 different areas of my bones. And, basically, what this cancer is, it's called, myelosarcoma, which is muscle loving. So it can go anywhere in your body. I How Speaker 0: but how my question is this. If it's 5 months after your Moderna shots, how long do you know how long it would take to grow a tumor that big? Speaker 1: I would they said it was the most aggressive cancer that they've seen, but I was developing mild headaches, like, after the Moderna shot, but I didn't think anything of it because I thought I was, perimenopausal because I had a hysterectomy. So I'm, like, I didn't know if I was because I still have my ovaries. Sorry. I'm talking with my hands. So I just basically thought it was just like a hormone thing. And then I they checked the pressure in my eye and my eye was bulging out of basically my head. The pressure was up and I found out. Speaker 0: They do to help you? Is that human out? Speaker 1: Basically, I got bounced around from hospital to hospital because nobody ever seen this type of tumor before. It's usually found in, little kids and also dogs after post rabies vaccinations. And, basically, I was transferred up to Tampa General, which is an hour away. They wanted to do a biopsy of it at the bedside because there wasn't enough operating rooms during COVID time, and I'm like, there's no way you're gonna do that to me. And then I ended up going to see a cancer specialist here. They didn't wanna touch me because they've never seen this before. So I ended up going to Moffett, Cancer Center, and they had to give me a pediatric, cancer doctor to take care of me that only seen a couple cases of this before in kids. And, basically, I ended up doing a medical clinical medical trial that's NIH approved and FDA approved. And I ended up over a 120 hours of chemotherapy. I had 90 sessions of radiation and over 40 days of staying in the hospital where they thought I was going to die. Speaker 0: And and then what happened? Speaker 1: And, basically, I had a few months of remission, and then the cancer came back again. Speaker 0: In the same place? Speaker 1: In a different place. This the second time it came back, it was in my pancreas and between my kidney and my liver and in my shoulder. And they said it because it's muscle loving, it can Speaker 0: show Speaker 1: up anywhere.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(19/57) MODERNA COVID INJECTION–TRIAL PARTICIPANT—“I know I got this vaccine that's caused me to have a rare cancer that has progressed way faster than it was supposed to.” In this clip from a HighWire segment, we hear from a participant of Moderna’s COVID-injection “clinical trial” describe how she developed T-cell lymphoma—a type of cancer that originates from T cells, a type of white blood cell in the immune system—following receipt of her injection. Since being diagnosed, the trial participant notes that she’s been to the doctor approximately 200 times and has had four surgeries. Despite the doctors’ visits and surgeries, however, the participant notes her cancer has only become “worse.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
It's been over two years since I joined the Moderna trial, and I've had numerous doctor visits and surgeries. Recently, I went to my dermatologist for an unbearable itch, leading to a biopsy that suggested T cell lymphoma. Further biopsies confirmed the diagnosis. I was told it was a slow-moving cancer, but soon developed rashes treated with a powerful retinoid, which caused severe side effects. After a brief period of improvement, the lymphoma worsened, resulting in painful, bubbly rashes that made it difficult to wear normal clothing. A blood test revealed the presence of Caesare cells, indicating blood involvement. I believe this vaccine has contributed to the rapid progression of my rare cancer, and now I can only have faith in God.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's been just a little over 2 years since I joined the Moderna trial. And I've been to the doctor probably 200 times. I know I had 4 surgeries. And I've gotten worse. I went into my dermatologist for this itch on my back that was driving me crazy. It had been itching and itching. I couldn't stand it anymore. I couldn't sleep. So she did a biopsy, and almost 2 weeks go by, and then she calls me and she says, we saw something that looks suggestive of T cell lymphoma. So they did 4 more biopsies. 1 on my right arm, 1 on my back, 1 on my stomach, and then one on my left back's arm. And they all came back just suggestive of t cell lymphoma except for the one on my back's arm came back definite t cell lymphoma. They told me that you have a very slow moving cancer, and and don't worry, and everything's gonna be fine. Sure enough, a month later, I had a rash on my stomach and a rash on my back. They treated me with a very powerful retinoid called Acetritin. But unfortunately, I had a lot of severe side effects from it. It seemed to work on my skin for about a month or 2, but then it just stopped working. And I just had, like, this lymphoma explosion all over my skin. Very uncomfortable, like, bubbly rash. It burned, and clothing bothered me. I could only wear, like, nightgowns around the house that were very soft and loose dresses when I went anywhere. So they wanted to do another blood test, and then the Caesare cells showed up. That's what they call t cell lymphoma, and with blood involvement, they're called Caesare cells. I know I got this vaccine that's caused me to have a rare cancer that has progressed way faster than it was supposed to. This is beyond my control. My only option is to just have faith in God.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(20/57) JILL KLEISS— “Shortly after I had my vaccine, two weeks later, I went to have my routine mammogram…[months later] I insisted on a biopsy…[and was told I] have the same breast cancer again [that I had prior to the ‘vaccine’] on the other side.” In this clip we hear from Jill Kleiss, also known as the Chemo Dancer on YouTube, who describes how she developed breast cancer following her COVID injection. Kleiss, who had had breast cancer prior to receiving the injection, developed cancer in the breast that had previously been healthy and cancer-free.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I had a mammogram that revealed a COVID node, which my doctor assured me was harmless. After receiving the vaccine, I had another mammogram, and again, they found a COVID node. My oncologist suggested a biopsy, which I insisted on despite initial resistance from my doctors. Eventually, they agreed to the biopsy. While substitute teaching, I received the call confirming my worst fear: I had breast cancer again, this time on the other side. I felt numb but reminded myself that I had overcome this before. If I hadn't detected the cancer through the enlarged lymph node, it might have gone unnoticed for a year, allowing the HER2 positive cancer to spread.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I had a mammogram. The doctors found something, and they told me it was a COVID node. She told me the COVID node was nothing to worry about, and my biggest fear was having to have chemo again. It was really hard to go through, but luckily, I only needed surgery and I didn't have to have chemo. Then COVID hit and I knew I had a compromised immunity. So I knew I wanted to get the vaccine as soon as possible. Shortly after I had my vaccine, 2 weeks later, I went to have my routine mammogram. The doctors found something, and they told me it was a COVID node. She told me the COVID node was nothing to worry about. It happened with a vaccine. So we'll check it 3 months later with an ultrasound. And then I went to see my surgeon, oncologist, and he said, Jill, you have a COVID note. I said, yeah. I looked into that. I said, nothing to worry about, I was told. And he said, when you get the ultrasound, you should do a biopsy too. So I insisted on a biopsy. They didn't wanna do it. I knew I had to be aggressive on this one. Everybody tried to discourage me. My doctors tried to discourage me. There was a lot of back and forth. And then finally, I got agreement that they were going to do a biopsy. I went back to work, substitute teaching, and I'm on the playground, and I get the call. And as soon as she picked up the call, I knew. I said, it's bad news, isn't it? And she said, you have the same breast cancer again on the other side. I was kind of numb of, okay, Jill. You did it before. You can do it again and just get through it. If I hadn't found the cancer to the enlarged lymph node that my body was alerting me I had cancer, I would have been dead in a year because they would have found the cancer till 1 year later in my next mammogram when HER2 positive had invaded my body.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(21/57) CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE BUS STORY—“[After receiving his COVID injection], all of the sudden he had multiple cancers, fluid buildup around the heart, [and] pneumonia.” In this clip from a Children’s Health Defense bus story, we hear from a gentleman who describes a cousin of his who developed brain and lung cancer following receipt of his COVID injection. The gentleman notes that his cousin subsequently died—the time between the development of the cancers and death was less than a year.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the summer of 2022, I saw my cousin, who had just retired and was dealing with back issues. Shortly after, he was found to have fluid around his heart and was diagnosed with lung cancer. His surgery for the back was postponed for treatment, but they couldn't identify the cause of the fluid. Eventually, he was also diagnosed with brain cancer. Due to his deteriorating condition, they decided against radiation after chemotherapy. He developed pneumonia while hospitalized and passed away in January. From being relatively healthy in July, he faced multiple severe health issues in a short time. His family was fully vaccinated, and his daughter was particularly cautious during COVID, not allowing anyone in the house.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I also have a cousin. It is 2023 right now. He summer of 2022, I had seen him 4th July. He was a a union brother as well. He had some back problems. He had just retired. And he was supposed to go in for surgery for his back, but he was discovered to have fluid build up around the heart and also was diagnosed with lung cancer. He went in for treatment, and they paused the surgery for his back. He went in for treatment for the lung cancer, and they couldn't find out what was causing the the fluid around the heart. And, subsequently, they also discovered he had brain cancer. And then, ultimately, they 4 they decided not to go with the radiation after the chemo because he was in such bad shape. And then he developed pneumonia while in the hospital and subsequently passed away in, I think it was January. So from 4th of July, he was totally fine other than the back problem. Right? He had a little he'd always had back trouble, degenerative discs. But then all of a sudden, multiple cancers, fluid build up around the heart, pneumonia. And you knew that he took the shot? Yes. His daughter wouldn't even let them in the house during COVID because she was so afraid. So there is no doubt in my mind their whole family was fully up to date. His wife, my other cousin, I know I know she has taken it. I know I know he had taken it. And and, you know, how many, I don't know, but I definitely know that they were they were vaccinated.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(22/57) CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE BUS STORY—”I…have three aunts that had turbo cancer from the COVID shot. They all died last year. Within months of each other.” A woman describes for Children’s Health Defense how three of her aunts all developed turbo cancer following their receipt of one or more COVID injections. She notes they all died within months of each other.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I have three aunts who developed aggressive cancer after receiving the COVID vaccine, and they all passed away last year within months of each other. One had pancreatic cancer, which is known for its rapid progression. The other two aunts had different types of cancer, but the family is not discussing the details.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I do have 3 aunts that had turbo cancer from the COVID shot. They all died last year within months of each other. What kind of cancer? One had pancreatic cancer, which I know is a fast cancer anyway. It does spread very quickly. The other 2, I don't even know. The family won't even talk about it. These are my cousins, of course, but my aunt's children.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(23/57) JEREMIAH’S AUNT, NANCY ARCHER—“I think [it] took, from her last shot, approximately, 12 months to get to that point where medicine didn’t even think they had an answer [for her cancer].” In this Children’s Health Defense bus interview, we hear from Jeremiah, who describes how his aunt, Nancy Archer, died of turbo cancer following receipt of a Pfizer COVID injection. “It was heartbreaking to watch her succumb to turbo cancer from the effects of the shot,” Jeremiah says. He notes that she only took the injection because she wanted to ensure that she could travel freely between her homes in the U.S. and Guatemala. The timespan between Nancy’s receipt of her final Pfizer injection and her turbo cancer–caused death was approximately one year according to Jeremiah.

Video Transcript AI Summary
My aunt, Nancy Archer, was a loving massage therapist and healer who supported me through tough times. Despite her belief in natural medicine, she got the Pfizer vaccine due to fear of being stranded while living on a tight budget in Guatemala. After her second shot, she felt a lump in her abdomen but chose to treat it naturally instead of seeking medical help. Over time, her condition worsened, and the VA struggled to diagnose her, eventually revealing widespread cancer. She opted out of chemotherapy and spent her remaining months with family. Although she didn't want to discuss it, she acknowledged that the vaccine might have contributed to her illness.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. We are live. Can you tell us your name, please? Speaker 1: My name is Jeremiah Blonde. Speaker 0: Alright. And this is a story about your aunt? Speaker 1: Yes. My my aunt, Nancy Archer, who was I was very close with. She had been there for me all my life and through my father's death and many other really trying times. And, she was a massage therapist and a healer. And, she healed me a lot and, just was there for me. And for so many people, she was loving, and it's, very into natural medicine and not going along with what the government has people do. But for some reason, she took the, Pfizer vaccine. Speaker 0: Why do you think that was if she was so into natural? What happened? Speaker 1: Well, she lived on a very tight social security budget. So she lived half the year in Guatemala, and she has a family there and people there. And, she was very afraid that she would be stranded somewhere. And, so she got the first shot and she's like, oh no more not doing that again. And then I think a month or 2 later she go she went ahead and got the second shot before she flew out to Guatemala. And so while she was in Guatemala she, started feeling like a lump in her gut and, like a hard sensation from the inside and out and, she, you know, wanted to treat it naturally whatever it was but she really didn't want to know so she didn't come back to the States and go to the doctor and, she basically wanted to heal naturally, meditation, those kinds of things and, she just started feeling worse and worse and felt the the lump getting bigger and bigger. And she, finally went through the VA and it took them a long time to make any kind of determination, but they were vacillating between ovarian cancer and mesentery cancer and, what is that? The appendix cancer. Just like and then eventually got to a point where they said, what? We don't we can't really help you. It's everywhere in your abdomen. And that was about I think that took from the her last shot approximately, 12 months to get to that point where, medicine didn't even think they had answer. So she chose to, go without chemo and, she lasted a few more months. We had a family reunion with her and she knew she was gonna go, but it was very hard to watch her. And, of course, I advised her many times not to get the shot and and it was heartbreaking to, watch her succumb to what I what I feel are super, sorry, terrible cancer from the effects of the shot. Speaker 0: Did she think that the shot gave her the cancer? Did she ever talk about it? Speaker 1: She didn't really wanna talk about it, but she knows that I I mean, I talked to her about it, but I was also trying to focus on and and helping her. But, yeah, I think she acknowledged she did acknowledge that it was most likely from the shot at one point.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(24/57) 2024 Study Published in Cureus Shows Significant Cancer Increase in Japan Following the Rollout of the COVID Injections in the Country Title: Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan Authors: Miki Gibo, et al. Published: April 8, 2024 Journal: Cureus Key excerpts: “No significant excess mortality was observed during the first year of the pandemic (2020). However, some excess cancer mortalities were observed in 2021 after mass vaccination with the first and second vaccine doses, and significant excess mortalities were observed for all cancers and some specific types of cancer (including ovarian cancer, leukemia, prostate cancer, lip/oral/pharyngeal cancer, pancreatic cancer, and breast cancer) after mass vaccination with the third dose in 2022.” “In 2020, the first year of the pandemic, there was significant deficit mortality for all causes (< 99% lower PI) and no excess mortality for all cancers. However, in 2021, there was significant excess mortality of 2.1% (>99% upper PI) for all causes and 1.1% (>95% upper PI) for all cancers. In 2022, the excesses increased to 9.6% (>99% upper PI) for all causes and 2.1% (>99% upper PI) for all cancers. In 2022, the number of excess deaths was 115,799 (95%CI: 106,018, 125,501) for all causes and 7,162 (95%CI: 4,786, 9,522) for all cancers.” Link: https://www.proquest.com/openview/4513714a8a02ac4e05aed1faa662214c/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2045583

Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan - ProQuest Explore millions of resources from scholarly journals, books, newspapers, videos and more, on the ProQuest Platform. proquest.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(25/57) “Five case reports of 71, 40, 76, 55, and 75 years old with diagnoses of colon cancer, breast cancer, skin cancer, and gastric cancer in the last two patients respectively days and months after receiving the second, third and fourth doses of the COVID-19 vaccine.” Title: Which Could Be the Risk Factors for Developing Cancer After Receiving The COVID-19 Vaccine? Authors: Huang, W. L Published: January 28, 2023 Journal: International Journal of Cancer Research & Therapy Key Excerpts: “There are several articles in the literature after the COVID-19 pandemic showing the necessity of vaccinating people who have a cancer diagnosis to prevent this disease in this group of patients. But what I want to report in this article is that I am facing an increasing number of cases of patients with cancer after receiving COVID-19 vaccines and this is what I want to describe in this study, using the thoughts of Hippocrates (460 bce - 375 bce), the father of medicine, that said that ‘it is more important to consider other ancient medical traditions prior to the knowledge we have nowadays.’” “Five case reports of 71, 40, 76, 55, and 75 years old with diagnoses of colon cancer, breast cancer, skin cancer, and gastric cancer in the last two patients respectively days and months after receiving the second, third and fourth doses of the COVID-19 vaccine.” “The conclusion of this study is that patients that are developing cancer after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine have in common, energy deficiency inside the five internal massive organs (and these alterations are the factors to induce cancer formation according to traditional Chinese medicine) and the use of this kind of vaccine has the potential to reduce even more the vital energy of the patient which is already very low and leading to a weakness state of the immune system and increasing the chance to have any kind of chronic diseases, in this case, cancer.” Link: https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/which-could-be-the-risk-factors-for-developing-cancer-after-receiving-the-covid19-vaccine.pdf

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(26/57) “We report on an aggressive, infiltrating, metastatic, and ultimately lethal basaloid type of carcinoma arising shortly after an mRNA vaccination for COVID-19…We propose that the vaccine can cause suppression of the immune system, which leads to accelerated cancer progression.” Title: Bell’s palsy or an aggressive infiltrating basaloid carcinoma post-mRNA vaccination for COVID-19? A case report and review of the literature Authors: Anthony M Kyriakopoulos, et al. Published: September 15, 2023 Journal: Journal of Experimental and Clinical Sciences Key Excerpts: “We report on an aggressive, infiltrating, metastatic, and ultimately lethal basaloid type of carcinoma arising shortly after an mRNA vaccination for COVID-19…We propose that the vaccine can cause suppression of the immune system, which leads to accelerated cancer progression.” “In this study we describe all aspects of this case and discuss possible causal links between the rapid emergence of this metastatic cancer and mRNA vaccination. We place this within the context of multiple immune impairments potentially related to the mRNA injections that would be expected to potentiate more aggressive presentation and progression of cancer. The type of malignancy we describe suggests a population risk for occurrence of a large variety of relatively common basaloid phenotype cancer cells, which may have the potential for metastatic disease.” Link: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10620857/

Bell’s palsy or an aggressive infiltrating basaloid carcinoma post-mRNA vaccination for COVID-19? A case report and review of the literature We report on an aggressive, infiltrating, metastatic, and ultimately lethal basaloid type of carcinoma arising shortly after an mRNA vaccination for COVID-19. The wife of the patient, since deceased, gave the consent for publishing the case. The ... pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(27/57) “Evidence is provided that adding 100 % of N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ) to the mRNA vaccine in a melanoma model stimulated cancer growth and metastasis…Based on this compelling evidence, we suggest that future clinical trials for cancers or infectious diseases should not use mRNA vaccines with a 100 % m1Ψ modification, but rather ones with the lower percentage of m1Ψ modification to avoid immune suppression.” Title: Review: N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ): Friend or foe of cancer? Authors: Alberto Rubio-Casillas, et al. Published: May 2024 Journal: International Journal of Biological Macromolecules Key Excerpts: “Evidence is provided that adding 100 % of N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ) to the mRNA vaccine in a melanoma model stimulated cancer growth and metastasis…Based on this compelling evidence, we suggest that future clinical trials for cancers or infectious diseases should not use mRNA vaccines with a 100 % m1Ψ modification, but rather ones with the lower percentage of m1Ψ modification to avoid immune suppression.” Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0141813024022323

Review: N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ): Friend or foe of cancer? Due to the health emergency created by SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes the COVID-19 disease, the rapid implementation of a new vaccine technology wa… sciencedirect.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(28/57) “Treg responses produced after mRNA vaccination and the subsequent mRNA-encoded SARS-CoV-2 spike protein expression may lead to a harmful influence on the immune system of vaccinees, and subsequent accelerated development of cancer and autoimmune disease.” Title: Oncogenesis and autoimmunity as a result of mRNA COVID-19 vaccination Authors: Anthony M Kyriakopoulos, et al. Published: April 23, 2024 Journal: TechRxiv PREPRINT Key Excerpts: “In summary, the Treg responses produced after mRNA vaccination and the subsequent mRNA-encoded SARS-CoV-2 spike protein expression may lead to a harmful influence on the immune system of vaccinees, and subsequent accelerated development of cancer and autoimmune disease. These mechanisms are consistent with both epidemiological findings and case reports.” Link: https://www.techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.22541/au.171387387.73158754

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(29/57) “In this report, a rare case of primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma (PCACC) localized in the subcutaneous tissue of the scapular region that grew after BNT162b2 corona virus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination…The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine has been associated with a multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-V). A comparable immune reaction could potentially enhance tumor growth rate.” Title: Primary Cutaneous Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma in a Rare Location With an Immune Response to a BNT162b2 Vaccine Authors: Yilmaz, Abdurrahman, et al. Published: April–June 2024 Journal: JBJS Case Connector Key Excerpts: “In this report, a rare case of primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma (PCACC) localized in the subcutaneous tissue of the scapular region that grew after BNT162b2 corona virus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination is presented and may be explained by CD4 and CD8 cell infiltration. The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine has been associated with a multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-V). A comparable immune reaction could potentially enhance tumor growth rate.” Link: https://journals.lww.com/jbjscc/abstract/2024/06000/primary_cutaneous_adenoid_cystic_carcinoma_in_a.7.aspx

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(30/57) “mRNA vaccine boosters may impair immune system response in immune compromised individuals. Multiple doses of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines may result in much higher levels of IgG 4 antibodies, or also impaired activation of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells.” Title: mRNA vaccine boosters and impaired immune system response in immune compromised individuals: a narrative review Authors: Alberto Boretti Published: January 27, 2024 Journal: Clinical and Experimental Medicine Key Excerpts: “mRNA vaccine boosters may impair immune system response in immune compromised individuals. Multiple doses of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines may result in much higher levels of IgG 4 antibodies, or also impaired activation of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells.” Link: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10238-023-01264-1

mRNA vaccine boosters and impaired immune system response in immune compromised individuals: a narrative review - Clinical and Experimental Medicine Over the last 24 months, there has been growing evidence of a correlation between mRNA COVID-19 vaccine boosters and increased prevalence of COVID link.springer.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(31/57) “The mRNA vaccines potentially cause increased risk to infectious diseases and cancer.” Title: Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs Authors: Stephanie Seneff, et al. Published: June 2022 Journal: Food and Chemical Toxicology Key Excerpts: “The mRNA vaccines potentially cause increased risk to infectious diseases and cancer.” “In this paper, we present evidence that vaccination induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health. Immune cells that have taken up the vaccine nanoparticles release into circulation large numbers of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites. We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance.” “These vaccinations have now been shown to downregulate critical pathways related to cancer surveillance, infection control, and cellular homeostasis.” Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027869152200206X

ScienceDirectScienceDirect sciencedirect.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(32/57) “In this report we describe the case of a healthy, young, athletic woman who developed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL)/lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) after receiving the second dose of the Pfizer/BioNTech modified mRNA (modRNA) COVID-19 genetic vaccine (marketed as Comirnaty)” Title: A Case Report of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL)/Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (LBL) Following the Second Dose of Comirnaty: An Analysis of the Potential Pathogenic Mechanism Based on of the Existing Literature Authors: Patrizia Gentilini, et al. Published: Posted April 1, 2024 Journal: PREPRINT Key Excerpts: “In this report we describe the case of a healthy, young, athletic woman who developed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL)/lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) after receiving the second dose of the Pfizer/BioNTech modified mRNA (modRNA) COVID-19 genetic vaccine (marketed as Comirnaty)” “A time interval of 16 weeks from the second vaccination to the diagnosis of cancer was noted.” Link: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Panagis-Polykretis/publication/379538444_A_Case_Report_of_Acute_Lymphoblastic_Leukaemia_ALLLymphoblastic_Lymphoma_LBL_Following_the_Second_Dose_of_ComirnatyR_An_Analysis_of_the_Potential_Pathogenic_Mechanism_Based_on_of_the_Existing_Literatu/links/6615050439e7641c0ba6c7f8/A-Case-Report-of-Acute-Lymphoblastic-Leukaemia-ALL-Lymphoblastic-Lymphoma-LBL-Following-the-Second-Dose-of-ComirnatyR-An-Analysis-of-the-Potential-Pathogenic-Mechanism-Based-on-of-the-Existing-Literat.pdf

ResearchGate - Temporarily Unavailable researchgate.net

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(33/57) “We report a case of neuropsychiatric symptoms and refractory HLH in a woman with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) after receiving her COVID-19 vaccine treated with belimumab, later found to have intravascular large B-cell lymphoma (IVLBCL) at autopsy.” Title: Fatal hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis with intravascular large B-cell lymphoma following coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus: an intertwined case Authors: Yusuke Ueda, et al. Published: November 6, 2023 Journal: Immunological Medicine Key Excerpts: “We report a case of neuropsychiatric symptoms and refractory HLH in a woman with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) after receiving her COVID-19 vaccine treated with belimumab, later found to have intravascular large B-cell lymphoma (IVLBCL) at autopsy.” Link: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/25785826.2024.2338594

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(34/57) “After reviewing the available literature, we are particularly concerned that certain COVID-19 vaccines may generate a pro-tumorigenic milieu (i.e., a specific environment that could lead to neoplastic transformation) that predisposes some (stable) oncologic patients and survivors to cancer progression, recurrence, and/or metastasis.” Title: SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and the Multi-Hit Hypothesis of Oncogenesis Authors: Raquel Valdes Angues, et al. Published: December 17, 2023 Journal: Cureus Key Excerpts: “After reviewing the available literature, we are particularly concerned that certain COVID-19 vaccines may generate a pro-tumorigenic milieu (i.e., a specific environment that could lead to neoplastic transformation) that predisposes some (stable) oncologic patients and survivors to cancer progression, recurrence, and/or metastasis.” Link: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10792266/

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and the Multi-Hit Hypothesis of Oncogenesis Cancer is a complex and dynamic disease. The “hallmarks of cancer” were proposed by Hanahan and Weinberg (2000) as a group of biological competencies that human cells attain as they progress from normalcy to neoplastic transformation. These ... pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(35/57) “We present a rare case of metastatic prostate cancer diagnosed after initially presenting as generalized lymphadenopathy following a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID) booster vaccination.” Title: Metastatic prostatic adenocarcinoma presenting as generalized lymphadenopathy unmasked by a COVID booster vaccine Authors: Kavya Bharathidasan, et al. Published: November 28, 2023 Journal: Clinical Case Reports Key Excerpts: “We present a rare case of metastatic prostate cancer diagnosed after initially presenting as generalized lymphadenopathy following a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID) booster vaccination.” Link: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ccr3.8278

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(36/57) “Our results raise grave concerns regarding the safety of the BNT162b2 vaccine and call for an immediate halt of all RNA biologicals unless these concerns can be dispelled.” Title: BioNTech RNA-Based COVID-19 Injections Contain Large Amounts Of Residual DNA Including An SV40 Promoter/Enhancer Sequence Authors: Ulrike Kämmerer, et al. Published: December 3, 2024 Journal: Science, Public Health Policy and the Law Key Excerpts: “We further analyzed RNA and DNA contents of these vials and identified large amounts of DNA after RNase A digestion in all lots with concentrations ranging from 32.7 ng to 43.4 ng per clinical dose. This far exceeds the maximal acceptable concentration of 10 ng per clinical dose that has been set by international regulatory authorities.” “Our results raise grave concerns regarding the safety of the BNT162b2 vaccine and call for an immediate halt of all RNA biologicals unless these concerns can be dispelled.” Link: https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/biontech-rna-based-covid-19-injections-contain-large-amounts-of-residual-dna-including-an-sv40-promoter-enhancer-sequence/

BioNTech RNA-Based COVID-19 Injections Contain Large Amounts Of Residual DNA Including An SV40 Promoter/Enhancer Sequence - Science, Public Health Policy and the Law Background: BNT162b2 RNA-based COVID-19 injections are specified to transfect human cells to efficiently produce spike proteins for an immune response. publichealthpolicyjournal.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(37/57) “These data demonstrate the presence of billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in these vaccines. Using fluorometry, all vaccines exceed the guidelines for residual DNA set by FDA and WHO of 10 ng/dose by 188 – 509-fold.” Title: DNA fragments detected in monovalent and bivalent 2 Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada: Exploratory dose response relationship with serious adverse events Authors: David J. Speicher, et al. Journal: PREPRINT Key Excerpts: “These data demonstrate the presence of billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in these vaccines. Using fluorometry, all vaccines exceed the guidelines for residual DNA set by FDA and WHO of 10 ng/dose by 188 – 509-fold…Our findings extend existing concerns about vaccine safety and call into question the relevance of guidelines conceived before the introduction of efficient transfection using LNPs.” Link: https://osf.io/preprints/osf/mjc97

DNA fragments detected in monovalent and bivalent Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada: Exploratory dose response relationship with serious adverse events. Background: In vitro transcription (IVT) reactions used to generate nucleoside modified RNA (modRNA) for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines currently rely on an RNA polymerase transcribing from a DNA template. Production of modRNA used in the original Pfizer randomized clinical trial (RCT) utilized a PCR-generated DNA template (Process 1). To generate billions of vaccine doses, this DNA was cloned into a bacterial plasmid vector for amplification in Escherichia coli before linearization (Process 2), expanding the size and complexity of potential residual DNA and introducing sequences not present in the Process 1 template. It appears that Moderna used a similar plasmid-based process for both clinical trial and post-trial use vaccines. Recently, DNA sequencing studies have revealed this plasmid DNA at significant levels in both Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna modRNA vaccines. These studies surveyed a limited number of lots and questions remain regarding the variance in residual DNA observed internationally. Methods: Using previously published primer and probe sequences, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and Qubit® fluorometry was performed on an additional 27 mRNA vials obtained in Canada and drawn from 12 unique lots (5 lots of Moderna child/adult monovalent, 1 lot of Moderna adult bivalent BA.4/5, 1 lot of Moderna child/adult bivalent BA.1, 1 lot of Moderna XBB.1.5 monovalent, 3 lots of Pfizer adult monovalent, and 1 lot of Pfizer adult bivalent BA.4/5). The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database was queried for the number and categorization of adverse events (AEs) reported for each of the lots tested. The content of one previously studied vial of Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was examined by Oxford Nanopore sequencing to determine the size distribution of DNA fragments. This sample was also used to determine if the residual DNA is packaged in the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) and thus resistant to DNaseI or if the DNA resides outside of the LNP and is DNaseI labile.  Results: Quantification cycle (Cq) values (1:10 dilution) for the plasmid origin of replication (ori) and spike sequences ranged from 18.44 - 24.87 and 18.03 - 23.83 and for Pfizer, and 22.52 – 24.53 and 25.24 – 30.10 for Moderna, respectively. These values correspond to 0.28 – 4.27 ng/dose and 0.22 - 2.43 ng/dose (Pfizer), and 0.01 -0.34 ng/dose and 0.25 – 0.78 ng/dose (Moderna), for ori and spike respectively measured by qPCR, and 1,896 – 3,720 ng/dose and 3,270 – 5,100 ng/dose measured by Qubit® fluorometry for Pfizer and Moderna, respectfully. The SV40 promoter-enhancer-ori was only detected in Pfizer vials with Cq scores ranging from 16.64 – 22.59. In an exploratory analysis, we found preliminary evidence of a dose response relationship of the amount of DNA per dose and the frequency of serious adverse events (SAEs). This relationship was different for the Pfizer and Moderna products. Size distribution analysis found mean and maximum DNA fragment lengths of 214 base pairs (bp) and 3.5 kb, respectively. The plasmid DNA is likely inside the LNPs and is protected from nucleases. Conclusion: These data demonstrate the presence of billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in these vaccines. Using fluorometry, all vaccines exceed the guidelines for residual DNA set by FDA and WHO of 10 ng/dose by 188 – 509-fold. However, qPCR residual DNA content in all vaccines were below these guidelines emphasizing the importance of methodological clarity and consistency when interpreting quantitative guidelines. The preliminary evidence of a dose-response effect of residual DNA measured with qPCR and SAEs warrant confirmation and further investigation. Our findings extend existing concerns about vaccine safety and call into question the relevance of guidelines conceived before the introduction of efficient transfection using LNPs. With several obvious limitations, we urge that our work is replicated under forensic conditions and that guidelines be revised to account for highly efficient DNA transfection and cumulative dosing. osf.io

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(38/57) “We conclude that the SV40 origin of replication and early control region are sufficient viral components for the genomic instability at sites of SV40 integration and that SV40 T Ag is not required.” Title: The genomic instability associated with integrated simian virus 40 DNA is dependent on the origin of replication and early control region Authors: D J Hunter, et al. Published: February 1, 1994 Journal: Journal of Virology Key Excerpts: “We conclude that the SV40 origin of replication and early control region are sufficient viral components for the genomic instability at sites of SV40 integration and that SV40 T Ag is not required.” Link: https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jvi.68.2.787-796.1994?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(39/57) “Residual DNA might be a risk to your final product because of oncogenic and/or infectivity potential. There are several potential mechanisms by which residual DNA could be oncogenic, including the integration and expression of encoded oncogenes or insertional mutagenesis following DNA integration.” Title: Guidance for Industry Characterization and Qualification of Cell Substrates and Other Biological Materials Used in the Production of Viral Vaccines for Infectious Disease Indications Authors: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Key Excerpts: “Residual DNA might be a risk to your final product because of oncogenic and/or infectivity potential. There are several potential mechanisms by which residual DNA could be oncogenic, including the integration and expression of encoded oncogenes or insertional mutagenesis following DNA integration.” Link: https://www.fda.gov/media/78428/download

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(40/57) SENIOR RESEARCH SCIENTIST STEPHANIE SENEFF—"Ninety-eight percent [98%] of the mentions of cancer [in VAERS in 2021] were COVID vaccines...This is just very striking to me that cancer is something that these vaccines cause that other vaccines don't cause..." To start the VAERS portion of this turbo-cancer mega thread, we have senior research scientist at MIT Stephanie Seneff describing for Dr. William Makis, Zen Honeycutt, et al. how the COVID injections are heavily associated with various cancers according to numerous reports in VAERS. "Ninety-eight percent [98%] of the mentions of cancer [in VAERS in 2021] were COVID vaccines," Seneff says. "It's hugely more highly represented than the number of COVID vaccines that were received in that year, so it's way out of line with the other [non-COVID] vaccines." "This is just very striking to me that cancer is something that these vaccines cause that other vaccines don't cause," Seneff adds. She notes that for VAERS reports of cancer regarding flu jabs, there are "practically none," which means the ratio of how often the COVID injections cause cancer versus flu jabs is "infinity." As for mechanism of action, Seneff highlights one paper describing PD-L1 overexpression as a result of the COVID injections, which, in turn, can increase one's odds of developing cancer. (PD-L1, Seneff notes, is a "molecule that's produced by both cancer cells and immune cells" that "prevents... immune cells from responding to both the... COVID virus, but also to cancer.") Seneff notes that the paper shows a "dramatic difference" in overexpression of PD-L1 in the control group versus the group recently injected with the COVID jabs, with the latter group showing far more of it.

Video Transcript AI Summary
VAERS, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, collects data on vaccine-related adverse events. Analysis shows that in 2021, 98% of cancer-related reports were linked to COVID vaccines, significantly higher than other vaccines. A comparison with the flu vaccine revealed virtually no cancer cases associated with it, highlighting a stark contrast. Research indicates that PD L1, a receptor produced by cancer and immune cells, may contribute to this issue. Elevated PD L1 levels were observed two days after vaccination, suggesting an activated immune system may suppress responses to both COVID and cancer. This nonspecific immunosuppressive effect raises concerns about the potential for increased cancer risk following vaccination.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Couple of examples here of data from the VAERS. VAERS is this database that the US government maintains. And I have spent a lot of time looking through VAERS. We did a lot of analysis. Speaker 1: Just one minute for people who don't know what VAERS is. It's the vaccine adverse event reporting system that has been set up by the CDC that doctors and patients can report, vaccine adverse events, for afterwards. Yeah. Speaker 0: And it's a very valuable database for looking at what's going on with the different vaccines. And so, in this same paper, food and chemical toxicology, we have a lot of data on various numbers on the counts of occurrences of different things with the COVID vaccines compared to all the other vaccines that were delivered in 2021. And the numbers are just astonishing because these are different words that are related to cancer, cancer lymphoma, leukemia, metastasis, carcinoma, neoplasm. So, we could look at the counts in the various database for that year, which was when the vaccine was introduced, for all the COVID vaccines and then for all vaccines altogether. And you can see that almost all of the cases, you know, 98% of the mentions of cancer were COVID vaccines. It's hugely highly more highly represented than the number of COVID vaccines that were received in that year. So it's way out of line with the other vaccines. And this is something that I found on the web. There's another analysis of, again, the same database. They compared the COVID vaccine to the flu vaccine. So this is the COVID vaccine, this is the flu vaccine, the counts for these 2 different vaccines normalized by the total number of vaccines administered. And for neoplasm, breast cancer, lymphoma, lung cancer, prostate cancer, brain neoplasms. All these different conditions, you can see the numbers here for COVID, there's practically none for the flu vaccine. So in many cases, the ratio is infinity. So this is just very striking to me that that cancer is something that these vaccines cause that other vaccines don't cause. And now you can see some of the evidence of why that might be. And this was a very interesting paper to me about this PD L1, overexpression of PD L1. That is a very dangerous thing to have because that is going to link to cancer. And so this was measured 2 days after the 2nd vaccine. So they'd had their 2 vaccine series. And a quote from the paper, an activated immune system needs to be regulated to avoid autoimmune collateral damage. And that's what's going on. There's such an intense reaction that the immune system cuts back and it tries to stop it by elevating this PD L1. You can see here's the control data and this is the, the vaccine recipient. Speaker 1: Stephanie, can you just tell us a little bit what is PD L1? Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. I will get to that in a moment, but it is a particular, receptor. It's a molecule that's produced by both cancer cells and immune cells. And it basically, just like IgG4 in a way, gets in the way. It blocks, the immune cells. It says stand down. It prevents the immune cells from responding to both the virus, the COVID virus, but also to cancer. So it can cause again, a dangerous increase in the potential of having cancer. And you can see this dramatic difference between the controls and the people 2 days after the vaccine. Vaccinations may have a nonspecific immunosuppressive effect lasting for a certain period of time. This is a quote from this paper. So they're concerned about this nonspecific, meaning that it could suppress the immune system response to cancer.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(41/57) VAERS ID 1220913: “HUSBAND DIED BECAUSE OF TERMINAL PANCREATIC CANCER.” (One dose of Moderna’s COVID injection.) https://t.co/e0iryfdfLg

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(42/57) VAERS ID 2184304: “HE HAD 2 LUMBAR SPINE X-RAYS ON OR ABOUT JULY 16, 2021, WHICH SHOWED LESIONS ON HIS SPINE…FROM THAT POINT ON I WATCHED THE TUMORS APPEAR ON HIS BODY AND HEAD. HE DIED 9/7/2021.” (Two doses of Moderna’s COVID injection.) https://t.co/t0ZBbVpa7k

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(43/57) VAERS ID 2785362: “TURBO CANCER RAPIDLY SPREAD THROUGHOUT HER BODY, EVENTUALLY WINDING UP IN HER SPINE AND BRAIN…TAKING HER LIFE.” (Three doses of Moderna’s COVID injection.) https://t.co/haWd0l5sfX

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(44/57) VAERS ID 1037833: “SHE [WAS] INFORMED THAT 3 DAYS AFTER THE SHOT, SHE HAD [A] CT WITH CONTRAST FOR STAGE 1 LUNG CANCER.” (One Pfizer COVID injection.) https://t.co/33rfHuGu3O

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(45/57) VAERS ID 1248298: “PATIENT PRESENTS TO EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ONE DAY AFTER VACCINATION…FOUND TO HAVE WIDELY METASTATIC...CANCER INVOLVING CHEST, ABDOMEN, AND PELVIS.” (Two Moderna COVID injections.) https://t.co/uOZEvqujz3

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(46/57) VAERS ID 1290185: “PATIENT STATES THAT WITHIN 2 WEEKS OF THE FIRST VACCINE SHE NOTICED BREAST SWELLING, NIPPLE INVERSION AND TENDER AXILA OF THE RIGHT BREAST…[SHE NOW HAS] INVASIVE BREAST CARCINOMA.” https://t.co/zPtBA8zDXq

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(47/57) SYMPTOMS TEXT SEARCH: CARCINOMA; TOTAL NUMBER OF REPORTS: 923 Note that in the context of the COVID injections, searching a single cancer-related term like “carcinoma” turns up more than 900 reports. Also note that VAERS reports are only a small fraction of the true number of adverse-event cases. According to one study performed by Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc. in 2011, it is estimated that VAERS is underreported by a factor of 100 or more. Source: https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(48/57) “I HAVE A FAMILY MEMBER WHO WAS IMMUNO-COMPROMISED, FORCED TO TAKE [THE] VACCINE TO KEEP [THEIR] JOB, [AND] NOW HAS TURBO CANCER & [IS] FIGHTING FOR [THEIR] LIFE.” https://t.co/Q8Qzyg4DFa

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(49/57) “MY EX TOOK IT...HE DIED 9 MONTHS LATER WITH TURBO CANCER.” https://t.co/TVMaGjcENk

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(50/57) “MY WIFE HAD HER BREAST CANCER IN CHECK BUT WAS MANDATED TO TAKE THE COVID SHOT [WHEN] SHE WAS A SCHOOL TEACHER. TURBO CANCER AND GONE IN 5 WEEKS.” https://t.co/EN9DlNUn51

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(51/57) “I LOST MY BELOVED MOTHER TO METASTATIC CANCER (SARCOMA KIDNEYS AND LUNGS) IN AUG [20]23. SHE DECLINED AFTER HER 5TH VACCINE (MODERNA) IN SEPT [20]22.” https://t.co/U2j0M8H6ja

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(52/57) “MY MUM WAS A HEALTHY, INDEPENDENT, OUT-EVERYDAY WOMAN UNTIL SHE GOT THE SHOT. 2 DAYS LATER SHE HAD BLEEDING BEHIND HER EYES, A FEW MONTHS AFTER THAT, DIAGNOSED WITH LUNG AND BRAIN CANCER…3 DAYS AFTER DIAGNOSIS PASSED AWAY.” https://t.co/8DtdEnuuoX

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(53/57) “I’VE LOST 5 OF MY FRIENDS (45-55 ALL VAXXED) ALL HAD WHAT I’D DESCRIBE AS TURBO CANCERS THAT SPREAD TOO QUICKLY FOR TREATMENT IN SOME CASES.” https://t.co/akzGIRHMJI

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(54/57) “MY [MOTHER IN LAW] WAS DIAGNOSED WITH BRAIN CANCER THIS PAST APRIL, THEY DID OPERATE, BUT 8 [WEEKS] LATER, SHE DIED. SHE WAS [VACCINATED] AT LEAST TWICE THAT WE KNOW OF.” https://t.co/tBT856ql5Z

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(55/57) “I HAVE A 47 YEAR OLD FRIEND WHO DIED THIS WEEK. TURBO CANCER. VAX AND BOOSTED. BRAIN TUMORS AND STAGE 4 COLON CANCER IN A MATTER OF MONTHS. DIED A YEAR LATER.” https://t.co/BLWLdls5oy

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(56/57) “MY DAD PASSED AWAY IN MAY FROM TURBO CANCER! HE WAS DIAGNOSED IN SEPTEMBER OF 2023, 8 MONTHS LATER HE DIED. HE WAS EXTREMELY HEALTHY, AND IN EXCELLENT SHAPE. HE TOOK 2 SHOTS WITHOUT MY KNOWLEDGE…” https://t.co/0kJ587txVP

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(57/57) “LOST MY FRIEND IN FEBRUARY TO A TURBO CANCER. SHE WENT FROM NO CANCER TO BONE CANCER AND STOMACH CANCER TO DEAD IN SEVERAL MONTHS. HER FAMILY PRESSURED HER TO TAKE THE SHOTS.” https://t.co/cQ66egypct

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(ADDENDUM TWEET 1) “You know, if you just read the pamphlet that comes with the COVID-19 vaccines, it says COMIRNATY has not been evaluated for…carcinogenicity…[Meaning] It hasn't been tested to see if it causes cancer.” In this clip, EMT and whistleblower Harry Fisher shows us the package insert that comes with the COMIRNATY injection (i.e. Pfizer’s ostensibly FDA approved COVID injection). He notes that the insert says that the injection has not been tested for potential carcinogenicity. Fisher notes that this means that “it hasn’t been tested to see if it causes cancer.” “They're constantly telling us it [the COVID injection] can't cause cancer, and they haven't even studied to see if it can,” Fisher adds. “They write it right there in the pamphlet.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The COVID-19 vaccine pamphlet states that comorbidity has not been evaluated for potential causes of carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, or male fertility impairment. It specifically mentions that carcinogenicity has not been tested, meaning there's no evidence to confirm whether it can cause cancer. Genotoxicity refers to the potential for a substance to damage genetic information, which could lead to mutations and cancer. Despite claims that the vaccine cannot cause cancer, the lack of studies on this aspect is noted in the pamphlet. Additionally, concerns about male fertility are raised.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, if you just read the pamphlet that comes with the COVID 19 vaccines, it says, comorbidity has not been evaluated for the potential cause, carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, or the impairment of male fertility. Carcinogenicity, it hasn't been tested to see if it causes cancer. And genotoxicity, the ability of a chemical, physical, or biological agent to damage a cell's genetic information, which can lead to mutations and potential cancer. They're constantly telling us it can't cause cancer, and they haven't even studied to see if it can. They write it right there in the pamphlet. And then there's the male fertility part. God bless.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(ADDENDUM TWEET 2) PLEASE ADD YOUR OWN PERSONAL TURBO-CANCER STORY TO THIS THREAD. For me: My first cousin once removed died of turbo cancer at the age of 40 and left behind one young son. Also: my uncle was diagnosed with skin cancer following his injection; my former barber was diagnosed with prostate cancer following his injection; my best friend’s father was diagnosed with colon cancer following his injection.

Saved - February 6, 2025 at 3:57 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across a peer-reviewed study urging the immediate withdrawal of COVID-19 vaccines, citing alarming evidence. It highlights excessive mortality linked to vaccinations, negative efficacy with vaccinated individuals facing higher infection risks, and DNA contamination in vaccine batches. The study notes that past vaccines were recalled after far fewer deaths than the 37,544 reported for COVID-19 vaccines. It also emphasizes a lack of clinical benefit and a violation of the Hippocratic Oath. Additionally, I found a recommendation for Good Ranchers, which offers trustworthy, American-raised meat.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

REPORT: A new peer-reviewed study finds irrefutable evidence supporting IMMEDIATE market withdrawal of the COVID-19 injections. The authors noted that the total number of COVID-19 vaccine deaths reported to VAERS has "far exceeded the recall limits of past vaccine withdrawals by up to 375,340%." Furthermore, they believe the shots should be immediately pulled from the market for the following reasons. 1.) Excess mortality: 12 studies link mass COVID-19 vaccination to increased deaths, with autopsies showing a high likelihood of a causal connection. 2.) Negative efficacy: Vaccinated individuals face a higher risk of infection than the unvaccinated, with some studies showing up to a 253% increased risk for those with more than three doses. 3.) DNA contamination: COVID-19 vaccine batches contain DNA fragments at levels far exceeding regulatory safety limits set by the FDA and EMA. 4.) Historical recall comparison: Past vaccines were pulled after as few as 10 deaths, while VAERS has reported 37,544 deaths globally. 5.) Lack of clinical benefit: No large-scale, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials show reductions in infection, hospitalization, or death. 6.) Hippocratic Oath violation: Continued administration of COVID-19 vaccines contradicts the principle of “do no harm” and demands immediate withdrawal. Shout-out to Nicolas Hulscher, Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, and Dr. Peter McCullough for their excellent work on this paper. Video via @zeee_media and @ElijahSchaffer.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Can you trust your meat? Do you know where it comes from? Is it raised in America? Good Ranchers delivers high-quality, American-raised meat you can trust—no seed oils, antibiotics, or hormones ever. Taste the difference at goodranchers.com/VNN and use code VNN for $25 off.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

READ MORE: Peer-Reviewed Study Finds Irrefutable Evidence Supporting Immediate Market Withdrawal of COVID-19 “Vaccines” https://vigilantnews.com/post/peer-reviewed-study-finds-irrefutable-evidence-supporting-immediate-market-withdrawal-of-covid-19-vaccines/

Peer-Reviewed Study Finds Irrefutable Evidence Supporting Immediate Market Withdrawal of COVID-19 “Vaccines” Please share this study far and wide so we can finally put an end to the catastrophic COVID-19 “vaccination” program. vigilantnews.com
Saved - February 13, 2025 at 6:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Multiple U.S. states are moving to ban COVID vaccines, with eight states leading the charge. Over 81,000 medical professionals and 240 elected officials are demanding the withdrawal of these vaccines, citing overwhelming evidence of harm. A peer-reviewed study indicates that vaccine-related deaths exceed recall thresholds significantly. Reports show vaccinated individuals face a higher risk of infection, and DNA contamination has been found in vaccine batches. The medical establishment is criticized for not adhering to the Hippocratic Oath, and more states may soon follow suit.

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

🚨BREAKING: Multiple U.S. states now moving to BAN COVID vaccines. And the Federal government may follow suit. THIS IS HUGE... 🧵Thread (1/11)

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

Eight states are leading the charge to END the "Jab" experiment: • Washington • Idaho • Montana • Iowa • Texas • Tennessee • South Carolina • Florida (Tell me in the comments if I've missed any.) (2/11)

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

KNOW THIS: Over 81,000 medical professionals, 240 elected officials, and 17 professional organizations are DEMANDING these shots be pulled. The evidence of the Vax's harm? OVERWHELMING. (3/11)

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

🔥NEW BOMBSHELL STUDY🔥 Peer-reviewed research CONFIRMS what we've been saying: These "vaccines" have exceeded previous recall thresholds by up to 375,340% Let THAT sink in. (4/11)

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨 Failure to Immediately Withdraw COVID-19 'Vaccines' Qualifies as Mass Negligent Homicide. Here's Why👇 📢 Widespread & Unified Calls for Market Withdrawal – More than 81,000 physicians, scientists, and concerned citizens, 240 elected officials, 17 public health & physician organizations, 2 State Republican Parties, 17 GOP County Committees, and 6 global studies demand immediate removal. ⚰️ Excess Mortality – 12 studies and VAERS confirm mass COVID-19 'vaccination' led to a catastrophic number deaths. 🚨 FDA Class I Recall Indicated – 37,544 VAERS-reported deaths exceed past vaccine recall limits by up to 375,340%. 📉 Negative Efficacy – Multiple studies have demonstrated that COVID-19 vaccinated individuals face a higher risk of infection compared to unvaccinated individuals. 🧬 DNA Contamination – Found across multiple manufacturers, batches, and geographic regions, far exceeding EMA & FDA safety thresholds. 📄 From our study: Hulscher N, Bowden M T., McCullough P A.. Review: Calls for Market Removal of COVID-19 Vaccines Intensify as Risks Far Outweigh Theoretical Benefits. Science, Public Health Policy and the Law. 2025 Jan 28; v6.2019-2025 @JimFergusonUK @RobertKennedyJr @BillCassidy @P_McCulloughMD @MdBreathe @McCulloughFund @VigilantFox @CDCgov @US_FDA @FDArecalls

Video Transcript AI Summary
If I had the opportunity to speak with RFK, I would focus on the urgent need to address the harm caused by the genetic injections. While tackling chronic disease and improving our food and water is crucial, removing these injections from the market is paramount. Our peer-reviewed paper in Science, Public Health Policy and the Law presents compelling evidence, including 12 studies demonstrating excess mortality, a causal link between the injections and death, and reduced life expectancy. We've found DNA contamination across multiple batches and manufacturers worldwide, and the injections have shown negative efficacy, increasing the risk of infection. Given the precedent of withdrawing products like the Qatar Polio vaccine, Swine Flu vaccine, and RotaShield vaccine for far fewer deaths or complications, the current situation, with over 30,000 VAERS death reports, demands immediate action. Continuing to administer these injections could be considered mass negligent homicide.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you had, an opportunity to meet with RFK, let's just say he gets appointed as the head of the HHS, the health service in America, what would you, what would you say to him? What would your your first choice be in terms of policy? Speaker 1: Well, so he's rightfully going after the chronic disease epidemic. Right over sixty percent of Americans have at least one chronic disease. So we got to address that. We got to address the the contaminated food supply, water supply, all that. It's super important. But we do have to get the genetic injections that have harmed, killed, or permanently disabled millions of people across the world off the markets. We have a peer reviewed paper out now in the journal Science, Public Health Policy and the Law, and we lay out all the evidence required that would be needed to get these injections off the market, immediately. 12 studies are included. 12 studies demonstrate excess mortality, causal link between COVID vaccination and death, reduced life expectancy from these injections. There's around 10 reports of DNA contamination when they look, nearly all of them find DNA contamination over the regulatory limits. And this is consistent across multiple batches, manufacturers, and is worldwide. And so they're contaminated. And lastly, negative efficacy. The vaccines don't work. They've now been demonstrated to increase your risk of infection dosed independently, and we have far surpassed the threshold for withdrawal of a pharmaceutical product. We have to look back at the Qatar Polio vaccine in the nineteen fifties that was pulled after ten deaths. The swine flu vaccine in the nineteen seventies was pulled after twenty to fifty deaths, and the RotaShield vaccine was pulled in 1999 due to fifteen cases of bowel obstruction. And so VAERS indicates over thirty thousand death reports now. So we have massively exceeded the limit for withdrawal of a product, and they have to get off. And continuing to administer or recommend these rejections could qualify as mass negligent homicide.

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

SHOCKING TRUTH about excess mortality: 12 separate studies now link mass vaccination to increased deaths 🚨 Autopsies showing DIRECT CAUSAL connections The science they tried to silence is speaking (5/11)

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

FACT: The "vaccinated" got MORE infections than the unvaccinated Some studies show up to 253% INCREASED RISK after 3+ doses Still trust Big Pharma's narrative? (6/11)

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

🧬 DNA CONTAMINATION ALERT: Tests reveal vaccine batches contain DNA fragments FAR ABOVE safety limits set by: • FDA • EMA Where's the Enemedia's coverage? There isn't any. They're still telling you to go get "the Jab". Or your 43rd booster. (7/11)

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

PERSPECTIVE: Previous vaccines were pulled after just 10 deaths Current VAERS data shows 37,544 deaths globally The math isn't hard, folks. They rushed a vaccine to market without proper testing and then tried to force you to take it. (8/11)

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

BIG PHARMA'S DIRTY SECRET: No large-scale, double-blind trials show these shots: • Stop you from getting COVID • Stop you from spreading it • Reduce infection • Prevent hospitalization • Save lives ZERO. NONE. NADA. But it turns out that it can kill you. (9/11)

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

Every doctor pushing these shots is violating their Hippocratic Oath. "First, do no harm" = MEANINGLESS to them now? The medical establishment has lost its way. (10/11)

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

🚨 The dam is breaking. More states will follow. Federal government will be FORCED to act. Stay informed. Stay vigilant. Share this thread. 👇 Oh, and also, sign up for your FREE subscription to my newsletter at http://RodMartin.org. (11/11)

The Rod Martin Report | Rod D. Martin | Substack Tech Entrepreneur. Futurist. Christian. "Philosopher Capitalist". Click to read The Rod Martin Report, by Rod D. Martin, a Substack publication with thousands of subscribers. rodmartin.org
Saved - May 29, 2025 at 6:13 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared alarming findings from four significant studies regarding the safety of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. The data indicate a dramatic increase in serious health issues, including myocarditis, heart attacks, and strokes, following vaccination. One study linked vaccines to a loss of life expectancy among vaccinated individuals. Given these findings, I believe immediate withdrawal of these vaccines is crucial to protect public health, especially for children still receiving them. The evidence suggests that continuing their use may lead to further loss of life.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

184 Million People, 4 Landmark Studies: COVID-19 mRNA Shots Are NOT SAFE FOR HUMAN USE 🚫 🩸 Autopsies. Heart Attacks. Strokes. Multi-Organ Failure — The Data Are In 👇 📍FAKSOVA ET AL (n=99 million): ➊ Myocarditis (+510% after mRNA injection) ➋ Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis (+278% after mRNA injection) ➌ Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (+223% after viral vector injection) ➍ Guillain-Barré Syndrome (+149% after viral vector injection) 📍RAHELEH ET AL (n=85 million): ➊ Heart Attack (+286% after second dose) ➋ Stroke (+240% after first dose) ➌ Coronary Artery Disease (+244% after second dose) ➍ Cardiac Arrhythmia (+199% after first dose) 📍HULSCHER ET AL (n=325 autopsies): ◾️Proved a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death via multiple organ systems. 📍ALLESSANDRIA ET AL (n=290,727): ◾️Subjects vaccinated with 2 doses lost 37% of life expectancy compared to the unvaccinated population during follow-up. IMMEDIATE market withdrawal of the COVID-19 mRNA injections is essential to prevent further loss of life among the 9 million American children still receiving them. In light of the overwhelming safety signals confirmed in the largest studies ever conducted, continued administration of these products now constitutes mass negligent homicide.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The McCullough Foundation has conducted over 20 peer-reviewed studies exposing harms of COVID-19 shots. One study, a systematic review of autopsy findings, allegedly proved a causal link between mRNA shots and death, thus putting Brazilian kids at risk. A study by Alessandro and colleagues purportedly found a 37% life expectancy reduction in those who received two or more doses. The first largest COVID-19 vaccine safety study of 99 million people allegedly found a 500% increased risk of myocarditis and a 200-300% increased risk of spinal cord inflammation, as well as Guillain Barre syndrome. The second largest study with 85 million people reportedly found a 300% increased risk of heart attacks, strokes, arrhythmias, and coronary artery disease. Another study last week allegedly showed that people with strokes who received mRNA shots are producing spike protein in their cerebral arteries for up to 17 months.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: At the McCullough Foundation, we have conducted over 20 scientific studies all published in the peer reviewed literature now, exposing the harms of these shots. And, I I I'll I'll go over some of the most glaring ones. And so, one of our studies, a systematic review of autopsy findings and deaths after COVID nineteen vaccination, actually proved a causal link between these mRNA shots and death. And so what Brazil's doing, they're putting these kids at risk of death. A study by Alessandro and colleagues found a thirty seven percent life expectancy reduction in those who received two or more doses. And so they're reducing the life expectancy of these kids, and it's just an absolute disaster. We now know few recent studies that are absolutely shocking that we are so we have the first, and we have the second largest COVID nineteen vaccine safety studies ever conducted. The first one, ninety nine million people in it. They found, five hundred percent increased risks of myocarditis, about two hundred, three hundred percent increased risks of spinal cord inflammation. And then we have Guillain Barre syndrome in that study. So that just that study proved it wasn't safe for human use. And then we have last week, the second largest study with eighty five million people, and it just came out. They found three hundred percent increased risks, heart attacks, strokes, arrhythmias, and coronary artery disease. And then we had another study last week that came out that showed people with strokes who got mRNA shots are producing spike protein in their cerebral arteries, so in their brains, for up to seventeen months. Or that's at least how long it looked. And so we have people now producing spike in their vital organs, reducing their life expectancy, risking death, risking cardiovascular damage, and it's absolutely dangerous. It's absolutely terrible that they're giving these to children.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

SOURCES⬇️ 1⃣FAKSOVA ET AL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38350768/ 2⃣RAHELEH ET AL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40191438/ 3⃣HULSCHER ET AL: https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/a-systematic-review-of-autopsy-findings-in-deaths-after-covid-19-vaccination/ 4⃣ALLESSANDRIA ET AL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39065111/

COVID-19 vaccines and adverse events of special interest: A multinational Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) cohort study of 99 million vaccinated individuals - PubMed This multi-country analysis confirmed pre-established safety signals for myocarditis, pericarditis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Other potential safety signals that require further investigation were identified. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
COVID-19 Vaccination and Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Multivariate Meta-Analysis of Preventive Benefits and Risks - PubMed Secondary analysis showed no notable disparity in cardiovascular outcomes between BNT162b2 and mRNA vaccines. The association of COVID-19 vaccination with the risk of coronary artery disease should be considered in future vaccine technologies for the next pandemic. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
A Systematic Review Of Autopsy Findings In Deaths After COVID-19 Vaccination - Science, Public Health Policy and the Law Background: The rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines, combined with a high number of adverse event reports, have led to concerns over possible mechanisms of publichealthpolicyjournal.com
A Critical Analysis of All-Cause Deaths during COVID-19 Vaccination in an Italian Province - PubMed Immortal time bias (ITB) is common in cohort studies and distorts the association estimates between the treated and untreated. We used data from an Italian study on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness, with a large cohort, long follow-up, and adjustment for confounding factors, affected by ITB, with the … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Saved - June 17, 2025 at 11:43 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A recent release of a COVID vaccine database from Japan, covering 18 million citizens, has raised alarming concerns. A respected professor warned that increased vaccine doses correlate with a higher risk of death, particularly peaking 3 to 4 months post-vaccination. The data shows that vaccinated individuals experienced a significant spike in mortality compared to unvaccinated ones. This has led to calls for further investigation into vaccine safety, echoing past instances where vaccines were withdrawn after fewer adverse events.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

JAPANESE BOMBSHELL: A COVID vaccine database covering 18 million citizens has just been released for the first time. After reviewing the data, a top professor warned: “The more doses you get, the sooner you’re likely to die.” The most terrifying finding was a deadly spike just 3 to 4 months after the final shot. Let’s break down the data. 🧵 THREAD

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

On June 15th, a group of brave Japanese truth seekers did what their government wouldn’t—they released a bombshell broadcast exposing vaccine data from over 18 million people. https://t.co/mUyJiosmJk

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Journalist Masako Ganaha posted on X: “If the government won’t do it, then the people should investigate the mass deaths of Japanese people! Database of 18 million vaccinated people revealed for the first time!” https://t.co/CAKdZLEFxk

@ganaha_masako - 我那覇真子 Masako Ganaha

【生配信】6月15日19時〜国がやらないなら国民の手で、日本人大量死の検証を!接種者1800万人データベース初公開!出演:原口一博衆議院議員、村上康文先生、情報公開請求チーム https://t.co/fBbahIMLEw

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The video featured Member of the House of Representatives Kazuhiro Haraguchi, Dr. Yasufumi Murakami, and the Information Disclosure Request Team.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Dr. Yasufumi Murakami isn’t just some fringe voice. He’s a respected professor at the Tokyo University of Science, where he serves as vice director at the Research Center for RNA Science. He holds a Doctor of Pharmaceutical Science from the University of Tokyo and has authored over 100 scientific publications.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

But when the data went public, things got deeply unsettling. Pharma insider @_aussie17 shared a clip from the broadcast. Dr. Murakami’s conclusion was blunt: “…the more doses you get, the sooner you’re likely to die, within a shorter period…” https://t.co/LneueMXWKt

Video Transcript AI Summary
6月15日現在、1800万人の接種回数分のデータが蓄積されている。接種者と非接種者を比較すると、非接種者はフラットだが、接種者は1ヶ月後から3~4ヶ月にかけて死亡者の山ができる。 医師たちは接種当日、翌日、1週間ぐらいに発生した副作用をPMDAに送る。接種を重ねるほど、死亡者の山が左に移動する現象が確認された。つまり、打てば打つほど死亡時期が早まる。 ワクチン接種に毒性や死亡を誘導する効果がなければ、この山はできない。接種回数が増えるほど山が左に移動するのは、毒素が蓄積し、回数が増えるほど早く死亡することを意味すると思われる。 **Translation:** As of June 15th, data has been accumulated for 18 million vaccinations. Comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, the unvaccinated remain flat, but the vaccinated show a peak in deaths from one month to three to four months after vaccination. Doctors send reports of side effects occurring on the day of vaccination, the next day, and within about a week to the PMDA. It was confirmed that as vaccinations increase, the peak of deaths shifts to the left. In other words, the more shots, the earlier the death. If the vaccination did not have toxic or death-inducing effects, this peak would not exist. The more the number of vaccinations increases, the more the peak shifts to the left, which seems to mean that toxins accumulate, and the more the number of vaccinations, the faster death occurs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: そして 三 月 二 十 九 日 そ の 呼 び かけ が あり 本 日 六 月 十 五 日 な ん と 一 千 八 百 万 人 の 接種 回 数 人 数 分 の データ が 蓄 積 さ れ て お り ます 。 Speaker 1: 者 が オレンジ で 接種 者 と 非 接種 者 を 正 確 に 比べ よう ということ を し て み ます と 非 接種 者 は ね 山 が で き な い っ て いう の は これ 当たり 前 な ん ですよね 打っ て も 別 に なく なる わけ じゃ な い 打っ て い ま せ ん の で 何 の 問 題 も なく フラット に なる わけ です 問 題 は 接種 者 の 方 な んですけれども 緑 の 裏 それ が 初め 低 い ん です が 一 週 間 二 週 間 は 少 な い ん です 無 料 で 一 月 ぐらい から 山 が です ね 普 及 に な っ て き ま し て 3 ヶ 月 4 ヶ 月 常 に すごい 山 が できる ということ に なる わけ です それ で です ね これ っ て いう の は どう いう こと かっ て いう と おそら く 打っ た お 医 者 さ ん た ち は 打っ た 当 日 翌 日 一 週 間 ぐらい に 関 し て 言 う と おそら く ワクチン の 影 響 だ ろう ということ で 副 作 用 が 発生 し た 。 官 能 が 発生 し て 食 べ なくなっ た ということ に なり ま し て P MD A に です ね 送る わけですよ そ の 情報 ところ が 一 月 二 月 です もう 一 つ それ から もう 一 つ 分かっ た こと な んですけど も 接種 を です ね 打て ば 打 つ ほど 山 が 左 の 方 に 移動 し て いる と いう 現 象 も 分かり ま し て 接種 回 数 が 増 え て い く と 死 亡 者 の 山 の 出 現 が 早く なり ます って こと は 打 て ば 打 つ ほど 死 に やす く なる と より 短 い 期 間 で 力 が 増 え て くる ということ で あり ま し て それ っ て まず です ね 山 が できる ワクチン 接種 に 毒性 だ と か 死 亡 を 誘導 する 効果 が なけれ ば 山 に まず な ら な い わけですよ これ が まず 一 つ の 発 見 で 打 つ 回 数 が 増 え れ ば 増 える こと を 移動 し て い く と いう ふう な こと は 打っ た 毒素 が 充 分 温 度 し て い っ て 回 数 が 増 え れ ば 増 える ほど 早く なくなっ て い く と いう ふう な こと だ と 思い ます Speaker 0: 。

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The first graph compared death rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. According to Dr. Murakami, there was no noticeable spike in deaths among the unvaccinated. But among the vaccinated, a clear peak emerged—especially between 90 and 120 days after the shot. “A significant peak forms at three or four months,” he said, pointing to the vaccine as the likely cause. “It’s probably due to the vaccine’s influence, with adverse reactions occurring leading to death.”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Then came a graph that was impossible to ignore. It showed a clear pattern: the more vaccine doses a person received, the sooner they died after their final shot. The title translates to: “Number of days from final vaccination to death and number of deaths.” The note on the right reads: “As the number of vaccine doses increases, the peak in deaths appears sooner.” Each line represents people grouped by the final dose they received before death. In other words, those counted under the third dose curve had received three shots and died before receiving a fourth. What stood out most was the steep green spike representing deaths after the third dose. Not only was it the highest, but it also appeared earlier, around 90 to 120 days. The trend held across the board: as the number of doses increased, the peak of death consistently moved closer to the time of the last injection.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@_aussie17 As Dr. Murakami noted, “We found that as the number of doses increases, the peak of deaths appears faster, meaning the more doses you get, the sooner you’re likely to die, within a shorter period. So, the risk increases with more doses.” https://t.co/5j7yTTA2NY

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@_aussie17 He added, “If the vaccine had no toxicity or didn’t induce death, there wouldn’t be a peak. That’s the point.” https://t.co/AI3PXHOFKr

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@_aussie17 “This is a key discovery,” he continued. “The more doses, the more the peak shifts, indicating that the toxicity accumulates. The toxicity overlaps, and the more doses you receive, the faster people die.” https://t.co/5ZorqBMOTU

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@_aussie17 While the data is truly alarming, it comes as no surprise to anyone who’s been paying attention. There’s simply no excuse for these shots to still be on the market. https://t.co/PLcP6Z4kbp

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Remember, the swine flu vaccine was pulled in 1976 after just 25 deaths and around 550 cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome—and that was with only a quarter of Americans vaccinated. Ultimately, 53 deaths were linked to the program, and the government not only shut it down but also issued apologies and compensation to victims.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1976, the U.S. had a mass vaccination program against the swine flu. At the time, the U.S. population was 220 million. After about a quarter of Americans were vaccinated, the program was shut down due to 25 deaths and 550 cases of Guillain Barre syndrome. The speaker asserts that "good old common sense" led to the conclusion that elective injections should not result in deaths. The speaker claims that deaths ultimately rose to 53, and apologies and reparations were given. The speaker concludes that it is unacceptable for anyone to die after an elective injection, and that this has always been the position of the U.S.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the first point I wanna make is there's a historical precedent in The United States on mass vaccination, and there's been several of them. But one to recall is the swine flu pandemic nineteen seventy six. Many of you were alive. 1976, I was 14 years old. This was going on. Gerald Ford was the president. We had 220,000,000 Americans. We had gotten to about a quarter of Americans vaccinated against the swine flu. And at twenty five deaths and five hundred and fifty cases of Guillain Barre syndrome, which is a form of ascending paralysis, the program was shut down. There was no Twitter. There was no Facebook. There was no VAERS or vaccine or version of that reporting system. Just good old common sense concluded that we can't give injections and have people die after an elective injection. It's unacceptable in American society. Now the deaths ultimately rose to fifty three deaths, and apologies were given. There were reparations. There were payments. But the point is, it's unacceptable to have anyone take an injection electively and die. It's absolutely unacceptable. It's not something that our country has ever thought is okay to do.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@_aussie17 As Dr. Peter McCullough (@P_McCulloughMD) stated in the video: “It’s unacceptable to have anyone take an injection electively and die. It’s absolutely unacceptable. It’s not something that our country has ever thought is okay to do.” https://t.co/xwnjpKehAi

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@_aussie17 @P_McCulloughMD Thanks for reading. Big hat tip to @_aussie17 for watching the Japanese broadcast and translating the clip featured in this thread into English. He’s absolutely worth a follow. https://t.co/EwxmFqEFDc

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@_aussie17 @P_McCulloughMD And if this evidence wasn’t enough, don’t miss the Senate hearing Pfizer never wanted you to see, led by @SenRonJohnson. https://t.co/aU5LAZrQHe

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The “safe and effective” narrative just collapsed on camera. Senator Ron Johnson brought the receipts, exposing how the Biden administration DELIBERATELY hid vaccine harms from the public. Then Dr. James Thorp (OB-GYN) revealed miscarriage data so disturbing, it left the room silent. This is the Senate hearing they never wanted you to see. I turned three hours of footage into a five-minute read. 🧵THREAD

View Full Interactive Feed