reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Quote: "[.] populations that received mRNA vaccines according to standard EUA intervals, our data suggest that vaccine effectiveness against any symptomatic disease is considerably lower against the delta variant and may wane over time since vaccination." https://nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2112981?query=featured_home…
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
"Breakthrough Infections of SARS-CoV-2 Gamma Variant in Fully Vaccinated Gold Miners, [.]" Illustrates importance of allowing infection and natural broader immunity of low-risk people, to reduce variant circulation and protect the vulnerable vaccinated. https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/27/10/21-1427_article
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
"Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity" "Natural immunity affords longer lasting & stronger protection [.] compared to BNT162b2 two-dose immunity." Spike-only focus=#fail. Natural immunity 🎯 M & N Protein. #BigPharma=#noobs? https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415v1.full.pdf
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Snowflake @trvrb is noobing around too. Doesn't properly cover the alarming S1 mutational dynamics: "muuh, something is wrong with preinfection immunity here". Admits: any rate above "1" is unlikely, then debunks himself with his own @nextstrain data. LOL. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.09.11.459844v1
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
"Selective and cross-reactive SARS-CoV-2 T cell epitopes in unexposed humans" "[.] preexisting memory CD4+ T cells that are cross-reactive [.] to SARS-CoV-2 & the common cold coronaviruses human coronavirus (HCoV)-OC43, HCoV-229E, HCoV-NL63, & HCoV-HKU1." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7574914/
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
"Shedding of Infectious SARS-CoV-2 Despite Vaccination when the Delta Variant is Prevalent" "in 93% of samples with Ct <25 indicates that high viral loads are consistent with the potential to transmit SARS-CoV-2, regardless of the [.] vaccination status." https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.31.21261387v3.full
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Special thanks to @jjcouey for his outstanding work. Follow him. Read his outstanding wrap-up on the #BigPharma-fail of the Century - non sterilizing Spike-only focus that has led to an unprecedented global clusterfuck concerning rational health policies. https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/e89cbef5-70d5-4555-89a9-32f2402dd1aa/downloads/SARS2parentsReview_CoueyJJ.pdf?ver=1633987108927
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
In the art & science project #allesaufdentisch @Kevin_McKernan also discusses with me about much better future outlooks than the narrow Spike-only focus that has blinded all fields of Life Sciences and has led us to an orthodox T-Cells/B-Cells Ignorance. https://youtu.be/l1FmkWOsgwc
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Join my telegram channel for more in depth resources & discussions (in the comments-group). https://t.me/bobbynetwork
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Addendum: "Robust T Cell Immunity in Convalescent Individuals with Asymptomatic or Mild COVID-19" At The Heart Of It All. Final Conclusion: Natural Immunity, consequently natural evolution doesn't care about the Spike, only #BigPharma does. I wonder why. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32979941/
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Addendum #2: Now @AlbertBourla will muuuh about: "Buu...buuu....buuut muuuuuuuuh Booosters muuuh". Answer: Nope, Albert, nope, you are a shitty noob.
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add. #3: "But muuh Bobby, why are you shilling for natural immunity?" Answer: Trillions of Spike can affect your B Cell Memory roster of all the other human betacoronavirions, this immunity is cross reactive. All of a sudden your body is focusing on an outdated 2020 Spike: #Fail.
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#4: "But muuh Bobby, that meme above is offensive." Answer: True, but we are in a memetic warfare. Political incorrectness serves as an ActionJacksonTrigger to rethink the overall divide et impera. Have another political incorrect meme in case @GVDBossche was right all along.
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#5: Quote: "Here are 40 more...", which I'll cover in detail within this thread or as an extra Immunology 101 thread overview. Thx 2 @Ayachuco1 for pointing out. https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1427606022831624198.html
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#8: "Waning of BNT162b2 vaccine protection [.] in Qatar" "[.] BNT162b2 effectiveness [.], [.] in the 1st 5 weeks after the 2nd dose. [.], with the decline accelerating ≥15 weeks [.], reaching diminished levels of protection by the 20th week." https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.25.21262584v1.full.pdf
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#9: "(CNN)Vaccination alone won't stop the rise of new variants and in fact could push the evolution of strains that evade their protection, researchers warned Friday." https://edition.cnn.com/2021/07/30/health/vaccination-alone-variants-study/index.html
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#11: "Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity: reinfections versus breakthrough infections" Vaccinated subjects had 13 times higher risk of new infection (Delta) VS natural immunity, 7x more likely to seek hospitalization. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415v1.full.pdf
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#12: "Reanalysis of [.] BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine data fails to find any increased efficacy following the boost: Implications for vaccination policy and our understanding of the mode of action" "no additional benefit from a 2nd vaccination". https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415v1.full.pdf
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#14: PAGE 23: "recent observations from UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) surveillance data that N antibody levels appear to be lower in individuals who acquire infection following 2 doses of vaccination" https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1027511/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-42.pdf
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#16: Correlation between % of population fully vaccinated & new COVID-19 cases in the last 7 days. Trend line suggests a marginally positive association such that countries with higher % of fully vaccinated have higher COVID-19 cases/1 million people. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481107/
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#17: "A professor at the renowned Johns Hopkins School of Medicine advised Americans recently to "ignore" guidance from the US CDC and Prevention due to the public health agency's puzzling refusal to recognize natural immunity from previous infection." https://www.theblaze.com/news/johns-hopkins-professor-ignore-cdc-natural-immunity-works#toggle-gdpr
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#18: "The SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant is poised to acquire complete resistance to wild-type spike vaccines" Evidence: Vaccines are ineffective with all variants other than the alpha. (yes the 2020 Spike, LOL @ #BigPharma) https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.22.457114v1.article-info https://archive.md/rG3Qh
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#20: Gentle Reminder: "Imperfect Vaccination Can Enhance the Transmission of Highly Virulent Pathogens" https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002198
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#21: "Functional SARS-CoV-2-Specific Immune Memory Persists after Mild COVID-19" "[.] determine whether mild infection induces a lasting, multilayered defense." "recovered [.] had formed an expanded arsenal of [.] specific immune memory cells [.] " https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(20)31565-8?_returnURL=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0092867420315658?showall%3Dtrue&utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
ADD.#22: "Longitudinal analysis shows durable and broad immune memory after SARS-CoV-2 infection w/ persisting antibody responses and memory B and T cells" In a nutshell: Natural immune system doesn't care that much about the Spike, only #BigPharma does. https://www.cell.com/cell-reports-medicine/fulltext/S2666-3791(21)00203-2?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS2666379121002032%3Fshowall%3Dtrue
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#23: Gentle Reminder: "Infection-enhancing anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies recognize both the original Wuhan/D614G strain and Delta variants. A potential risk for mass vaccination?" https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34384810/
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#24: "Decreased breadth of the antibody response to the S-Protein of SARS-CoV-2 after repeated vaccination" "[.] These data [.] cast doubts about the convenience of repeatedly immunizing with the same S protein sequence." https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.12.21261952v2.full.pdf
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#25: "Shedding of Infectious SARS-CoV-2 Despite Vaccination" "Individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 despite full vaccination have low Ct values and shed infectious virus." https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.31.21261387v4.full.pdf
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#26: "Epitope-resolved profiling of the SARS-CoV-2 antibody response identifies cross-reactivity w/ endemic human coronaviruses" This cross-reactivity aquired via natural immunity (adaptive) is now irritated by trillions of transcribed S-subunits. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666379120302445#fig3
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#28: "The spike protein of [.] variant A.30 is heavily mutated and evades vaccine-induced antibodies with high efficiency" 🤡: Pouring the same antibiotics ("2020 Spike") onto the antibiotics resistant culture ("A.30") Antibodies ≠ Immunity https://www.nature.com/articles/s41423-021-00779-5/figures/1
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#29: "Vaccine-induced S-specific immunity resulted in severe ALI (acute lung injury) in SARS-CoV infected Chinese macaques." https://insight.jci.org/articles/view/123158
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#30: "[.] evidence that antibodies targeting endemic CoV are robustly boosted in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection but not to vaccination w/ stabilized S, [.] the S2 subdomain [.] triggers [.] IgG-dominated response that lacks neutralization activity." https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.10.27.21265574v1
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#31: "Noooooooo! Singapore! Nooooooooo!" https://covid.viz.sg/
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#32: "SARS–CoV–2 Spike Impairs DNA Damage Repair & Inhibits V(D)J Recombination In Vitro [.] full–length spike protein inhibits DNA damage repair by hindering DNA repair protein recruitment. [.] potential side effect of the full-length spike vaccine." https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/10/2056/htm
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#33: "[.] two different ADE risks have possible implications for SARS-CoV-2 B-cell vaccines [.]. These models place increased emphasis on the importance of developing safe SARS-CoV-2 T cell vaccines that are not dependent upon antibodies." https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2021.640093/full
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#34: ReCap: •CoronaVirusFetish.exe •GeneticEngineering.exe •FurinCleavageSite.exe •LabLeak.exe •OriginsLie.exe •WrongEpitope.exe •mRNA.exe •Variants∞.exe •BigFail.exe https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32194980/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34073934/ https://www.pnas.org/content/106/14/5871 https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318902
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#37: Flashback 2012: "Immunization with SARS [.] vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus [.] vaccines all induced antibody,[.] led to occurrence of Th2-type immunopathology, hypersensitivity to SARS-CoV components." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22536382/
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#38: Déjà vu 2021: "Long-lived macrophage reprogramming drives spike protein-mediated inflammasome activation in COVID-19 [.] primary SARS-CoV-2 vaccine antigen (S-protein) [.] drives pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion in human monocytes." https://archive.md/l8HcG#selection-8249.3-8249.164
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#39: "But muuuuuuh noooo muuuuh" Flashback: Japan FOIA (@pfizer's own animal testing data) https://www.pmda.go.jp/drugs/2021/P20210212001/672212000_30300AMX00231_I100_1.pdf
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#40: "[.] mRNA Vaccine Can Induce Acute Myopericarditis in Mouse Model" “Aspiration”: pulling back syringe plunger once needle is inserted ⇢ if vein=hit ⇢🩸-signal "@CDC & @WHO [.] against aspiration [.] to minimize pain." https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab707/6353927 https://ibb.co/MDhCKC0
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#41: 'Noooo @WSJ Noooooo! Muuuh!' "Some of the mRNA in the vaccines may also be taken up by heart cells,[.] then produce the spike , [.] lab tests [.] found that heart cells have taken up the @moderna_tx vaccine and then expressed the spike protein." https://archive.md/KLKyR
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#42: ⇒"muuh mRNA translation in Deltoid only". (No) ⇒♥️-cells producing outdated 2020 Spike=🤡 ⇒♥️-cells presenting S-antigen to T-Cells via major histocompatibility complex (MHC)=🤡 ⇒♥️-cell tagged 4 destruction ⇒♥️-cells only? (No) Let that sink in. Dr. Schneider=noob
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#43: ⇶: https://bit.ly/3bXMlov Misfolding: https://bit.ly/3n1GIvM BNT162b2: https://bit.ly/2YwVlxN GGT: https://bit.ly/31Om76e RNA: https://bit.ly/3wydVlH ψ: https://bit.ly/31TnssB 6XKL: https://bit.ly/3qnqpf5 Coptigate: https://bit.ly/2YD7aCQ
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#44: "[.] transmission & viral load of SARS-CoV-2 delta [.] in vaccinated & unvaccinated [.] in the UK: fully vaccinated have peak viral load similar to unvaccinated cases. [.] can transmit infection in household, incl. to fully vaccinated contacts" https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(21)00648-4/fulltext
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#45: "First case of postmortem study in a patient vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 By postmortem molecular mapping, we found viral RNA in nearly all organs examined." https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971221003647 #SafeAndEffective
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#46: Time for a meme for my NZ bros & sisters to further enjoy the mRNA-Spike-Only-Focus-Circus-Show.
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#47: Back 2 #NaturalImmunity: fresh: "Pre-existing polymerase-specific T cells expand in abortive seronegative SARS-CoV-2" 731 healthcare workers, 1st wave: 58 didn't test + despite high-risk. A spike in T-cells. @jjcouey, in case you missed this. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-04186-8_reference.pdf
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#48: @Independent not denying #NaturalImmunity anymore. "Why some people test negative for Covid even though everyone around them is infected" T cells ‘sniff out’ proteins even when buried within, [.] antibodies ‘grab hold’ of shapes on the surface.” https://archive.md/yEF4R
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#49: Even the @guardian derailing their own Science™ narrative now (also see tweet "Add.#47"): "The work suggests that a subset of people already had memory T-cells from previous infections [.] common colds, which protected them from Covid-19." https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/10/people-exposed-to-covid-yet-not-falling-ill-may-have-immune-memory-finds-study
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#50: @rki_de - responsible for disease control and prevention: 60.9% of symptomatic COVID-19 infections in week 41-44 are assumed to be breakthrough infections page 22 https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Situationsberichte/Wochenbericht/Wochenbericht_2021-11-11.pdf?__blob=publicationFile Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20211111204324/https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Situationsberichte/Wochenbericht/Wochenbericht_2021-11-11.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#51: Noo, Fauci, noo! "According to Fauci, [.] waning immunity VS both infection & hospitalization [.]. more & more of those ppl who are getting breakthrough infections are winding up in the hospital." "muuh Booster": Again D614G 2020 S, not Delta. https://news.yahoo.com/dr-fauci-just-issued-urgent-201846228.html
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#52: Noooo Billy Boy Noooooo! @BillGates about his most prized “solution”: "We didn't have vaccines that block transmission," said Gates, contradicting previous interviews. "We got vaccines that help you with your health, but they don't reduce the transmission,” he added.
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#53: "[.] boosting with the Beta variant in the preprimed group resulted in better neutralization of the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain than the Beta strain. [.] immune imprinting [.] may have occurred." "Muuuh Boosters work" Nope ⤑ Immune Imprinting. https://www.cell.com/trends/immunology/fulltext/S1471-4906(21)00177-0
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#54: Noooo Taiwan NooooooooOOOoo! I hate you Taiwan, this will increase mRNA hesitancy. NooooooOOOoo000oo. Muuuuuuuuuh. "Taiwan suspends 2nd dose Pfizer Covid vaccine for 12-17 olds over heart inflammation" https://www.wionews.com/world/taiwan-suspends-2nd-dose-pfizer-covid-vaccine-for-12-17-olds-over-heart-inflammation-428777
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#55: Noooo China Noooooo! "[.] Vaccine Hesitancy Among Medical Students: The Next COVID-19 Challenge in Wuhan, China The main factors: ⟿ knowledge about COVID-19 vaccine, ⟿ training related to COVID-19 vaccines, ⟿ education level." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34496990/
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#56: Nooooo Boston Nooooooo! Quote: "Breakthrough cases in Massachusetts have been making up about 35% to 40%. Breakthrough hospitalizations have been accounting for 30% to 35% [.]." https://www.bostonherald.com/2021/11/16/massachusetts-coronavirus-breakthrough-cases-spike-5313-last-week-as-infection-counts-climb-again/ Archive: https://archive.ph/wip/ORNnM
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#57: "'Original antigenic sin' (OAS): A potential threat beyond the development of booster vaccination VS novel SARS-CoV-2 variants OAS can trigger immune evasion of the emerging variants in those [.] vaccinated VS former versions of the pathogen." https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/infection-control-and-hospital-epidemiology/article/original-antigenic-sin-a-potential-threat-beyond-the-development-of-booster-vaccination-against-novel-sarscov2-variants/C8F4B9BE9E77EB566C71E98553579506
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#58: Now it's time for a political incorrect meme again I found in the chans. I blackfaced the chad to comply to the Twitter-etiquette, I hope that is ok, not?
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#59: "The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein alters barrier function in 2D static and 3D microfluidic in-vitro models of the human blood–brain barrier" In Vitro, nevertheless, let's keep an eye on that in the next tweets. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096999612030406X?via%3Dihub
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#60: Evidence for "Add.#59": "Potential adverse events in Japanese women who received tozinameran (BNT162b2, Pfizer-BioNTech) [.] cerebral venous sinus thrombosis & intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) associated with BNT162b2, Pfizer-BioNTech, [.]" https://joppp.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40545-021-00326-7
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#60: Evidence for "Add.#59", @AstraZeneca: "[.] clinicians should be aware that in some patients, venous or arterial thrombosis can develop at unusual sites such as the brain or abdomen, [.] clinically apparent [.] 5 to 20 days after vaccination." https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104840
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#61: "'Vaccine-Induced Covid-19 Mimicry' Syndrome: Splice reactions within the SARS-CoV-2 Spike open reading frame result in Spike protein variants that may cause thromboembolic events in patients immunized with vector-based vaccines" https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-558954/v1
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#62: Flashback September 2020: "SARS-CoV-2 binds platelet ACE2 to enhance thrombosis in COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 virus directly activates platelets and potentiates their prothrombotic function and inflammatory response via Spike/ACE2 interactions." https://jhoonline.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13045-020-00954-7
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#63: FastForward the Sept2020 Flashback in Add.#62 to Mai2021: "Thrombotic thrombocytopenia associated w/ COVID-19 infection or vaccination: Possible paths to platelet factor 4 autoimmunity [.] after vaccination with adenoviral vector-based vaccines" https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1003648
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#64: Flashback: "SARS-CoV-2 spike protein S1 induces fibrin(ogen) resistant to fibrinolysis: Implications for microclot formation in COVID-19 We conclude that the spike protein may have pathological effects directly, without being taken up by cells." https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.05.21252960v1.full.pdf
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#65: "Muuuh S1 only in Deltoid" (Nope) "[.] (SARS-CoV-2) Vaccine Antigen Detected in the Plasma of mRNA-1273 Vaccine Recipients [.] detectable levels of S1 antigen in plasma in 11 participants, and spike antigen was detected in 3 of 13 participants." https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab465/6279075
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#66: "SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Elicits Cell Signaling in Human Host Cells: Implications for Possible Consequences of COVID-19 Vaccines [.] consider their long-term consequences carefully, [.] when they are administered to [.] healthy individuals [.]." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC7827936/
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#67: "IL-6 Signalling? Nooooo! Muuuuuh!" (Yes) Flashback December 2020: "SARS-CoV-2 spike protein promotes IL-6 trans-signaling by activation of angiotensin II receptor signaling in epithelial cells" https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33284859/
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.68: "Muuuh IL-6 Signal does nothing Muuuh" (It does) Flashback 2012: "IL-6 Trans-Signaling via the Soluble IL-6 Receptor: Importance for the Pro-Inflammatory Activities of IL-6" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3491447/
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.69: More Spike / Cell-Signalling that should be considered: "SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Induces Paracrine Senescence and Leukocyte Adhesion in Endothelial Cells" https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/JVI.00794-21
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#70: "An evidence that [.] spike damages hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells in the mechanism of pyroptosis in Nlrp3 inflammasome-dependent manner" Spike itself causes cell damage by eliciting a pro-inflammatory response. "Muuuh not our Spike" (Sure) https://www.nature.com/articles/s41375-021-01332-z
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#71: Have a meme to cheer you up, let's return to happier topics, how about Bio Distribution of LNPs?
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#72: LNP 101: ⤍LNP could have targeted ligands (outside), would only transfect muscle cells ⤍#BigPharma designed with PEG polymers (outside) to evade immune system ⤍"PEG reason for LNP throughout body, no targeting ligands ⤍ transfect any cell" https://www.cas.org/resource/blog/understanding-nanotechnology-covid-19-vaccines
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#73: "Muuuh Stop it, no more LNP-talk, return to Mutational Dynamics of S1 & Evasion" (OK) "SARS-CoV-2 immune evasion by B.1.427/B.1.429 variant of concern B.1.427/B.1.429 S variant [.] unusual neutralization escape strategy." https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/science.abi7994#F4
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#74: "Rates of SARS-CoV-2 transmission & vaccination impact the fate of vaccine-resistant strains [.] 3 risk factors favour vaccine-resistant strain: high probability of initial emergence of resistant strain, high Nr. infected, low % vaccination." https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-95025-3
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#75: As "Add.#74" shows: The United Booster Empire will need a lot of micro-management-autism and everything will be tightly scheduled to obtain VIP-status, it's literally a race with time and every day counts. Non-sterilizing mRNA Transfection is no Walk In The Park.
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#76: "Muuuh Stop the Mutational Dynamics Bobby, stop it now!" (Ok, how about ADE?). Flashback 2005: "Caution raised over SARS vaccine [.] a jab against one strain might even aggravate an infection with SARS virus from civets or another species." https://www.nature.com/articles/news050110-3#ref-CR1
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#77: FastForward July 2020: "A perspective on potential antibody-dependent enhancement of SARS-CoV-2 hypothesis that ADE is a consequence of low-affinity antibodies that bind to viral entry proteins but have limited or no neutralizing activity." https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2538-8
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#78: FastForward September 2020: "Antibody-dependent enhancement of coronavirus [.] a potential risk in the vaccine therapy for the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, as it shares the same viral receptor and similar genome sequence with SARS-CoV." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32920233/
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#79: FastForward Feb2021: "At the Intersection: SARS-CoV-2 / Macrophages & the Adaptive Immune Response: A Key Role for Antibody Dependent Pathogenesis But Not Enhancement of Infection in COVID-19" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC7483033/
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#80: "Pathogenic priming [.] contributes to serious & critical illness & mortality in COVID-19 via autoimmunity [.] proteins w/ largest nr. of immunogenic peptides were the Spike & [.] NS3. [.] proteins had at least 1 match to human proteins except 1" https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589909020300186
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#81: "Muuuuuh Stop it! Muuuuuh! #SafeAndEffective! 95% Efficiency!"
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#82: 95%? Absolute VS Relative Trickery? Reminder: "COVID-19 vaccine efficacy & effectiveness-the elephant (not) in the room 0·9% for the Pfizer–BioNTech, 1% for the Gamaleya, 1·4% for the Moderna–NIH, 1·8% for the J&J, and 1·9% for the AstraZeneca" https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(21)00069-0/fulltext
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#83: "Noooooo Belgium Noooooo! Muuuuh!" [via @FatEmperor]
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#84: "Noooooooo Hungary Nooooooo! Muuuuh Nooooo! That's racist! I hate you now! Muuuuh!" 45% of hospitalisations are vaccinated. https://hungarytoday.hu/vaccinated-hungarians-hospitalization-covid/ https://archive.ph/QfcAk https://www.blikk.hu/aktualis/belfold/koronavirus-hirek-korhaz-betegek-gulyas-gergely/wwg3m27 https://archive.ph/zG6cR
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#85: Correction for "Add.#79": Wrong manuscript link posted, here is the correct one: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349568846_At_the_Intersection_Between_SARS-CoV-2_Macrophages_and_the_Adaptive_Immune_Response_A_Key_Role_for_Antibody-Dependent_Pathogenesis_But_Not_Enhancement_of_Infection_in_COVID-19
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#86: May I Introduce to you the current political Suicide Commando of Austria: @a_schallenberg, @WolfgangMueckst, @BgmLudwig and many more.
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Nooooooo Gibraltar Noooooooo! That's racist! Muuuuuuh! Nooooooooooooooo0000oooo! "Despite 100 percent vaccination quote: Gibraltar cancels Christmas festivities" #SafeAndEffective Illiterate @WolfgangMueckst: "Muuuh our only way out Muuuh!" https://www-berliner--zeitung-de.translate.goog/news/trotz-100-prozent-impfquote-gibraltar-sagt-weihnachtsfeste-ab-li.195627?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=nui
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#88: "Immunological imprinting: [.] subsequent infections w/ related strains produce a ‘back-boosting’: increased antibody titers toward epitopes shared between current & historic strains encountered earlier in life." [Thx 2 @Harvard2H 4 pointing out] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-23977-1
@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra
Add.#89: further references, analysis and thesis to "Add.#88": https://t.co/plfBP4cwUM
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
Vaccines & autism 🧵
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24354891/
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://deeprootsathome.com/buried-evidence-rises-again-chronic-disease-immune-systems-injuries/
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4199012/
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4215490/
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23069197/
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-risk-of-neurodevelopmental-disorders-following-Geier-Kern/9c310147e02a126fc582ef51f226bb82c4848f4d
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16807526/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14976450/
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://mobile.twitter.com/gyan_chakshu/status/1508607251652784134
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4215490/
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17454560/
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18482737/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15795695/
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/21549155 https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Transcriptomic-analyses-of-neurotoxic-effects-in-of-Li-Qu/c917a1eb0e77ef552701d5d137c9c886d18ff975
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20803069/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21225508/
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22015705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3264864/
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3350976/
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://www.ei-resource.org/research/autism-research/neurodevelopmental-disorders-maternal-rh-negativity-and-rhod-immune-globulins/ wellwithin1.com/A%20Prospectiv…
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://www.academia.edu/18981599/Thimerosal_Clinical_Epidemiologic_and_Biochemical_Studies
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Thimerosal-exposure-%26-increasing-trends-of-puberty-Geier-Young/e76a5f17403db14dbeb8d7bb649438e9541cb0f5
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4065774/
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21568886/
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22099159/
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22235057/
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25506338/
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20882368/ https://www.ei-resource.org/research/chronic-fatigue-syndrome-research/a-role-for-the-body-burden-of-aluminium-in-vaccine-associated-chronic-fatigue-syndrome/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18281624/
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11335699/ https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Macrophagic-myofasciitis-lesions-assess-long-term-Gherardi-Coquet/93f6cb57bfce76a641745d6e19f595eb647d3a3f
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23557144/ vaccinepapers.org/wp-content/upl…
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18281624/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19740540/
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0162013409001895 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12660567/
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25428645/
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0896841113001364
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0896841113001364
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Peptide-cross-reactivity%3A-the-original-sin-of-Kanduc/bfe027a0f67a2fa223881fc89fe5ee81dc90cfdb https://doaj.org/article/e1a266f64fc146bba33f2d03726898e3
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23579772/ https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0008382
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25277820/
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/family-to-receive-15m-plus-in-first-ever-vaccine-autism-court-award/ https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/court-awards-over-20-million-for-vaccine-caused-autism-102981579.html
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
@UnrollThread
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://mobile.twitter.com/gyan_chakshu/status/1408481553118863361
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://mobile.twitter.com/julesserkin/status/1527969553644503041 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1307095/Family-win-18-year-fight-MMR-damage-son--90-000-payout-concerns-vaccine-surfaced.html
@julesserkin - jules serkin
“A mother whose son suffered severe brain damage after he was given the controversial MMR #vaccine as a baby has been awarded £90,000 compensation” https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1307095/Family-win-18-year-fight-MMR-damage-son--90-000-payout-concerns-vaccine-surfaced.html
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://www.avianflutalk.com/uploads/3816/The_Truth_behind_vaccine_cover-up.pdf
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://thehill.com/opinion/healthcare/425061-how-a-pro-vaccine-doctor-reopened-debate-about-link-to-autism/amp/
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://www.omicsonline.org/scientific-reports/2155-9899-SR-679.pdf
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21623535/
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/vaccines-autism-and-brain-damage-whats-in-a-name/
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
Newborn encephalopathy is associated with autism. Note: Encephalopathy is also a recognized v@x injury (DPT/DTaP/MMR) https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1017/S001216220600020X https://www.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/hrsa/vicp/vaccine-injury-table-01-03-2022.pdf
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
“Autism can be characterized as chronic low grade encephalopathy” https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/15/1/372
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://go.thetruthaboutvaccines.com/wp-content/uploads/130-STUDIES-LINKING-VACCINES-TO-NEUROLOGICAL-AND-AUTOIMMUNE-ISSUES-COMMON-TO-AUTISM.pdf
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
Study validating findings of study of Dr. Paul Thomas & James Lyons-Weiler that was retracted https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/59/118
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://www.scribd.com/doc/220807175/214-Research-Papers-Supporting-the-Vaccine-Autism-Link
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://howdovaccinescauseautism.org/
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
Brain damage within hours of vaccination. Case reports from1949 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/285157 https://moscow.sci-hub.ru/4147/089455fbb7f273349ad53f3b61a82d33/globus1949.pdf?download=true
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/we-re-in-an-emergency-mercury-exposure-linked-to-high-youth-suicide-attempt-rate-in-grassy-narrows-first-nation-1.6486120
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Mega Thread: COVID-19 Vaccines It has been two years since the EUA was issued for the the COVID-19 Vaccines. We have been told ad nauseam they are “safe & effective”, but is that truly the case? There have been hundreds of studies conducted that tell a different story.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
A story that is being suppressed and I aim to go through some evidence and hopefully change your mind if you were still under the illusion that these injections are a benefit to anyone. First let’s state some facts that are now undeniable with the benefit of hindsight.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
1.The Infection Fatality Rate for Covid is a worldwide average of 0.23%. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/340124/PMC7947934.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y 2.Risk is highly age stratified. If you are under 70 w/o major co-morbidities you have a 99% chance of survival. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9613797/
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
3.The vast majority of covid deaths were experienced by people over 75 and with multiple co-morbidities like obesity or diabetes. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1191568/reported-deaths-from-covid-by-age-us/ 4.Children are not in danger from covid & the majority have natural immunity.They were never a risk to spread it widely.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
5.“Asymptomatic” spread was and never has been a driving factor in infectious disease outbreaks. It was a lie with no evidence and used to justify lockdowns and other ghastly world destroying policies. https://youtu.be/NQTBlbx1Xjs
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
One could argue that given these facts alone, the need for a vaccine should have been out of the question. Nonetheless a vaccine that is experimental & injected into 5 billion people with no long term studies.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
That would be logical if we didn’t live in a world that has been so thoroughly corrupted. Keep in mind that there are many others ways to treat covid that are genuinely safe and effective. It’s just that they have all been demonized in lockstep, on worldwide scale.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The fact that this was achieved so successfully should send shivers down your spine. The only solution given were the vaccines. No other options. They were touted as 95% effective based on the clinical trials. Every news organization dutifully reported those fraudulent numbers.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
This was a fraud & has been shown to be in the data that was released by Pfizer and only after they were sued to do so. https://soniaelijah.substack.com/p/was-pfizers-95-vaccine-efficacy-fraudulent I won’t go into motives of those who have so fervently pushed these vaccines, that is for another thread.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
I am going to focus on what the science says and present enough evidence that anyone with a brain should come to the conclusion that the risk posed by these “vaccines” is far greater than the risk posed by the virus.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
In fact the “vaccines” are the true public health crisis that is just now coming into focus thanks to researchers publishing data contrary to the orthodoxy being imposed on the world.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
As dark as this subject matter is given the evidence, this should provide some hope that there are people who care about humanity and won’t stand by idly while sociopaths seek to destroy it.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
First let’s look at VAERS is showing as to today and keep in mind VAERS is highly underreported so these numbers are very likely to be higher by orders of magnitude. Does this look “Safe and Effective”?
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
These numbers are also consistent with Europes reporting on adverse side effects as well as other governmental sources of data. Don’t not let people gas light you when it comes to reported outcomes, that is a tactic of low information tyrants.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
A false report on VAERS is punishable with a prison sentence and most reports are inputted by hospital staff and validated by the CDC. Keeps these numbers in mind as a backdrop to what the science says. They are much larger than what is being reported imo.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The Science Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest Following mRNA Vaccination in Randomized Trials https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4125239 “The excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest surpassed the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Increased emergency cardiovascular events among under-40 population in Israel during vaccine rollout and third COVID-19 wave” https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-10928-z
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“the findings raise concerns regarding vaccine-induced undetected severe cardiovascular side-effects and underscore the already established causal relationship between vaccines and myocarditis, a frequent cause of unexpected cardiac arrest in young individuals.’
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs” This is a thorough review of the evidence, look at these conclusions. NOT SAFE AND EFFECTIVE. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9012513/
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“In this paper, we call attention to three very important aspects of the safety profile of these vaccinations. First is the extensively documented subversion of innate immunity, primarily via suppression of IFN-α and its associated signaling cascade.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“This suppression will have a wide range of consequences, not the least of which include the reactivation of latent viral infections and the reduced ability to effectively combat future infections.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Second is the dysregulation of the system for both preventing and detecting genetically driven malignant transformation within cells and the consequent potential for vaccination to promote those transformations.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Third, mRNA vaccination potentially disrupts intracellular communication carried out by exosomes, and induces cells taking up spike glycoprotein mRNA to produce high levels of spike-glycoprotein-carrying exosomes, with potentially serious inflammatory consequences.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Should any of these potentials be fully realized, the impact on billions of people around the world could be enormous and could contribute to both the short-term and long-term disease burden our health care system faces.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Potential antigenic cross-reactivity between SARS-CoV-2 and human tissue with a possible link to an increase in autoimmune diseases https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7246018/
@Truth61211 - Health Uncensored
Vaccines and Autism: The needle and the damage done. In the pursuit to unravel the link between vaccinations and autism, we must first examine what autism actually is. The word autism is just a label attached to a grouping of symptoms. The question is, what’s causing those symptoms? It’s well-established that chronic neurological inflammation is a hallmark symptom of autism. “Neuro-inflammation and neuro-immune abnormalities have now been established in ASD as key factors in its development and maintenance.” https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6027314/ Inflammation in the brain can emerge in response to infections. Extensive research conducted during the 1970s drew attention to the correlation between maternal Rubella virus infection during pregnancy and a significantly higher risk of giving birth to an autistic child. "In the 1970s, Stella Chess found a high prevalence of autism in children with congenital rubella virus syndrome (CRS), 200 times that of the general population at the time. Many researchers quote this fact to add proof to the current theory that maternal infection with immune system activation in pregnancy leads to autism in the offspring." https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4734211/ If Rubella Virus can contribute to the onset of Autism, can other viral infections have a similar influence? It turns out there are similar studies implicating Herpes Simplex virus infection or reactivation during pregnancy significantly increases the likelihood of having an autistic child as well. https://science.org/content/article/herpes-virus-may-be-trigger-autism Multiple case reports and studies have highlighted a relationship between viral infections of the brain and the onset of Autism Spectrum Disorder. Viral encephalitis refers to a viral infection that directly affects the brain, triggering a an inflammatory response from the immune system. An 11 year old boy develops autism following Herpes Simplex encephalitis: http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12369775/ A 31 year old man develops autism following Herpes Simplex encephalitis: http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1743418/ A 14 year old girl is diagnosed with Herpes Simplex encephalitis while simultaneously experiencing the onset of autism: http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3558293/ Multiple case reports of autism following Herpes Simplex encephalitis: https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/44606/10803_2005_Article_BF01046406.pdf https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/42465/787-11-3-142_20110142.pdf%3Bjsessionid%3D6668769580DE859C8D9E123220C9D449?sequence%3D1… It's important to note that many viruses can cause encephalitis, not just Herpes or Rubella. There are multiple studies highlighting dysfunctional natural killer cells in those with autism, natural killer cells are subset of lymphocytes responsible for addressing and clearing viral infections. This research supports the hypothesis of unresolved, chronic viral infection... https://jaacap.org/article/S0890-8567(09)65685-9/pdf… https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6521549/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33191807/. Several studies have shown impaired detoxification in those with autism and reduced glutathione levels... https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4017810/ Those on the autism spectrum are repeatedly shown to be deficient in all of the fat soluble vitamins A, D, E, and K. https://frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.742937/full https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28217829/#:~:text=Children%20who%20are%2C%20or%20who,about%2075%25%20of%20autistic%20children…. https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4017810/ Poor detoxication and deficiencies of all fat soluble vitamins would be indicative of underlying liver and gallbladder disease. https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10255381/#:~:text=In%20the%20cholestatic%20diseases%2C%20impaired,D%2C%20E%20and%20K…). There are several studies showing that common viruses like Herpes Simplex can cause liver and gallbladder disease. "Other systemic viruses, most notably those of the herpes virus family, also cause hepatic disease including cholangitis and possibly ductopenia in both immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients." https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2702917/#:~:text=Biliary%20tract%20infections%20are%20characterized,infection%20of%20the%20biliary%20tract…. Part 2 - Vaccine induced viral reactivation and Vaccine injuries. So, we have a hypothetical mechanism behind the pathology of autism being rooted in chronic viral infection, encephalitis and immune system dysfunction. Now, the big question: Can vaccinations act as catalysts for viral reactivation and subsequent encephalitis? There is a phenomenon known as Vaccine Induced Viral Reactivation. It's where a vaccination causes immune system dysfunction allowing dormant viral infections that a person was already carrying to reactivate and spring to life, this may be involved in triggering many autoimmune diseases and conditions. Before the Covid-19 pandemic, research and literature on this subject was notably scarce. However, there had been some documentation of vaccine induced viral reactivation in medical databases. For instance: "Based on three cases reported to the Swiss Drug Monitoring Centre SANZ, we postulated previously that vaccinations may trigger reactivation of herpes virus infections due to vaccine-induced immunomodulation. In the meantime, 10 new cases of reactivated herpes virus infections soon after vaccinations have been reported. They involved 5 women and 5 men with an age range between 16 and 60. In only one case had a trauma preceded, otherwise healthy subjects with no known relevant comorbidity were vaccinated. The clustering of reports after publication points to a previous underreporting of similar cases." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11103441/ A case report suggesting a causal association between vaccination and Herpes Simplex viral reactivation. "We report the case of a 57 year-old woman who developed transverse myelitis and acute HSV-2 reactivation following influenza vaccination. Over the next 5 years, she experienced a fluctuating course of improvement and regression for both myelitis and herpes." https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5360113/ It's important to recognize that vaccines often contain adjuvants like aluminum, which are designed to modulate immune function and stimulate a response against the targeted pathogen. However, the inclusion of aluminum adjuvants can skew immunity toward a TH2 response, as demonstrated in studies. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18400340/ For decades, vaccines used an organic form of Mercury known as Thimerosal as a preservative. Thimerosal is also shown to skew the immune system towards a TH2 response. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17079650/ A shift towards TH2 based immunity will promote Herpes Simplex viral replication and increase disease severity, underlining the intricate relationship between immune modulation and viral responses. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11024539/ Additionally, strong evidence of vaccine-induced encephalitis has been documented. VAERS data from the United States between 1990 and 2010 has revealed 1396 cases of encephalitis reported after vaccination. Encephalitis onset occurred within 6 weeks after vaccination in 65.2% of cases and within 2 weeks in 50.7% of cases, with Hepatitis B, Influenza, and MMR vaccinations being among the major triggers... https://n.neurology.org/content/78/1_Supplement/P03.151 With the rollout of Covid-19 vaccination campaigns, the scrutiny of vaccine injuries and vaccine-induced viral reactivations intensified. A growing body of case reports has documented the damaging impact of Covid-19 vaccines on the immune system, awakening dormant viruses within individuals. This includes... Herpes Zoster virus reactivation after COVID-19 vaccination… https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34554601/ Epstein-Barr Virus reactivation after COVID-19 vaccination… https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35799871/ Herpes Simplex reactivation after COVID-19 vaccination… https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8656951/ Hepatitis C reactivation after COVID-19 vaccination… https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34512037/ HIV reactivation after COVID-19 vaccination… https://nature.com/articles/s41467-022-32376-z The data is undeniable, vaccine induced viral reactivation is a very real threat! The link between viral infections, chronic inflammatory disorders, and autoimmune conditions has been firmly established for decades. It is widely acknowledged that viral infections can serve as major triggers for autoimmune responses... https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6723519/ More literature showing Covid vaccination and a causal association with new onset autoimmune disease... https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imm.13443 Multiple case reports further substantiate the connection between encephalitis and neurological diseases triggered by Covid-19 vaccinations... https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1341321X22000496 https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8420261/ https://cureus.com/articles/56583-two-cases-of-post-moderna-covid-19-vaccine-encephalopathy-associated-with-nonconvulsive-status-epilepticus#!/… https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8136261/ The connection between vaccines, viral reactivation, autoimmune issues, and neurological problems is a area of research that demands further investigation! Wouldn't you agree?
@CartlandDavid - Dr David Cartland
1000 peer reviewed articles on “Vaccine” injuries https://drtrozzi.org/2023/09/28/1000-peer-reviewed-articles-on-vaccine-injuries/
@_HeartofGrace_ - Christie Laura Grace
1/ 🚨🧵BLOOD VESSELS, Spike Protein, LNP, Immune System and CLOTS: PART TWO: THE LINING OF BLOOD VESSELS CARRY A CHARGE, AND CAN CHANGE WHEN INFLAMMATION AND INJURY OCCURS. Many interesting studies on animals occurred in the 80s, and this is another. (zeta on LNP will matter)
@_HeartofGrace_ - Christie Laura Grace
1/ 🚨🧵BLOOD VESSELS, Spike Protein, LNP, Immune System and CLOTS: PART ONE: Blood Vessels 101. Several studies on charges (+/-) of vessels, blood, and the harm lipids can do were performed in the 1980s. They are still relevant. Unearthed a very important one today.
@_HeartofGrace_ - Christie Laura Grace
2/ The study: Electronic Antihemocoagulation DeLangis, P. A., & Yen, T. F. (1986). Electronic antihemocoagulation. Biomaterials, medical devices, and artificial organs, 14(3-4), 195–225. https://doi.org/10.3109/10731198609117543 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3814714/
@_HeartofGrace_ - Christie Laura Grace
3/ The study asks whether electrical current through blood and vessels can either extend the time it takes for blood to clot or prevent clot formation. The study aims to identify at what point in the clotting process these effects occur. This was done with and without animals.
@_HeartofGrace_ - Christie Laura Grace
4/ All cells and surfaces in the body carry an electrical charge, influenced by characteristics of cells, particles, and surrounding medium (liquid or solid). In the vascular system (blood vessels, heart, etc), most particles in the blood carry a NEGATIVE CHARGE.
@_HeartofGrace_ - Christie Laura Grace
5/ Red blood cells are negatively charged due to the presence of negatively charged sialic acid residues on their surface glycoproteins. The zeta potential of red blood cells falls in the millivolt (mV) range, with values ranging from -10 mV to -30 mV under physiological
@_HeartofGrace_ - Christie Laura Grace
6/ conditions. These values can change depending on factors like pH and the presence of other ions in the blood. White blood cells also carry a negative charge, primarily due to the negatively charged sialic acid residues on their surface glycoproteins. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Electrical-properties-of-the-red-blood-cell-and-Fernandes-C%C3%A9sar/2f1a754b0cd2773c00bac9665db597290ee1fc66
@_HeartofGrace_ - Christie Laura Grace
7/ The zeta potential of white blood cells can vary between different types of leukocytes and under different conditions. The zeta potential of white blood cells can be affected by factors such as pH, ionic strength, and the presence of other ions in the blood. Additionally,
@_HeartofGrace_ - Christie Laura Grace
8/ the activation state of white blood cells (e.g., activated vs. resting) and their specific type can lead to variations in zeta potential. Platelets, like other blood cells, also have a negative charge on the surface, primarily due to the presence of negatively charged groups.
@_HeartofGrace_ - Christie Laura Grace
9/ : Blood plasma contains proteins, like albumin and globulins, which have both positive and negative charges. Albumin has a net negative charge, while some globulins may have a net positive charge. These proteins contribute to the overall zeta potential of the blood.
@_HeartofGrace_ - Christie Laura Grace
10/ The intima (inner layer) of blood vessels is typically negatively charged compared to adventitia (outer layer). However, trauma to the blood vessel can neutralize or even make the charge positive, leading to thrombosis (clot formation) at the injury site. The charge changes!
@_HeartofGrace_ - Christie Laura Grace
11/ If a cut is made into a blood vessel, it results in a POSTIVE CHARGE at the injury site. The study shows if the cut is kept negatively charged by applying an electrical current, clotting at the site will be inhibited, and the wound will continue to ooze. Conversely, if the
@_HeartofGrace_ - Christie Laura Grace
12/ electrical current is reversed and made positive, clotting will accelerate. When oppositely charged electrodes were submerged in a beaker of blood, a clot formed only at the positive electrode. Additionally, under similar conditions, white blood cells (leukocytes)
@_HeartofGrace_ - Christie Laura Grace
13/ migrated toward the negative electrode, indicating a change in cell polarity from negative to positive, possibly as a response to combat inflammation. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-leukocyte-recruitment-cascade-possible-effects-of-MPO-In-noninflamed-tissue_fig5_229555575
@_HeartofGrace_ - Christie Laura Grace
14/ In the vascular system, the intima is negatively charged compared to the adventitia. Vessel trauma can lead to a change in charge (neutral or positive) and result in thrombosis. This means the charge is moving from negative to positive, when inflammation and injury occurs
@_HeartofGrace_ - Christie Laura Grace
15/ in the lining of human blood vessels. "Vessel trauma" is any form of injury or damage to the blood vessel, caused by physical injury, surgical procedures, or disease-related damage.
@_HeartofGrace_ - Christie Laura Grace
16/ When a blood vessel experiences trauma, it can lead to a change in electrical charge. This change can manifest in two ways: Neutral Charge: The negative charge in the intima may become neutral, meaning it loses its excess negative charge. b. Positive Charge:
@_HeartofGrace_ - Christie Laura Grace
17/ In some cases, trauma can cause the negative charge to reverse and become positive.
@_HeartofGrace_ - Christie Laura Grace
18/ Thrombosis is blood clot formation within a blood vessel. A change in the electrical charge of the blood vessel's inner lining, particularly when it becomes neutral or positive due to trauma, is associated with the initiation or acceleration of the thrombosis process.
@_HeartofGrace_ - Christie Laura Grace
19/ "Negatively charged phospholipids, most particularly phosphatidylserine, are required for binding of the substrates, fIX or fX, to the phospholipid surface." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4826570/
@_HeartofGrace_ - Christie Laura Grace
20/ This is all going to come together in the following threads discussing the first waves of covid infection, DNA plasmid contamination with a high negative charge contaminating the current RNA "vaccine", and what happened to some people with infection vs. RNA "vaccination".
@_HeartofGrace_ - Christie Laura Grace
21/ It will also show why the negatively charged LNP, especially those with a higher negative charge which contain even more DNA plasmids, contributed to not only endothelial damage, but myocarditis. There are lot numbers here in this study which show higher DNA plasmid
@_HeartofGrace_ - Christie Laura Grace
22/ contamination led to higher rates of adverse events. If you look at each one of these lot numbers listed here in this study, you will see myocarditis as a primary severe adverse event, alongside clotting.
@_HeartofGrace_ - Christie Laura Grace
23/ I am going to bring you closer to what this mechanism should be. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088814/
@_HeartofGrace_ - Christie Laura Grace
@DrJBhattacharya @drdrew
@AnwaltUlbrich - Tobias Ulbrich
I won't soon forget the crime against pregnant women and the endless suffering. @rosenbusch_ had posted the link from mdr (a German public broadcasting department of the first public Television in Germany)I won't soon forget the crime against pregnant women and the endless suffering. https://mdr.de/wissen/corona-impfung-schwangere-frauen-wann-schutz-fuer-kinder-100.htm The misery caused by this reporting makes my face flush with anger. Please, dear mdr - paragraph 14 of the press code requires you to read the available material in its entirety and to evaluate it, not to use it as advertising propaganda. I will only try to briefly outline what is missing and it is by no means everything. 1. PSUR#3 from BioNTech Out of 130 women observed who were vaccinated by BioNTech within the first trimester of pregnancy, there were 14 abortions and one stillborn child at birth and another 14 children with congenital anomalies. That is 25 percent of the pregnant women observed! In a group of pregnant women in which the third of the pregnancy in which the vaccination took place was not recorded, BioNTech found that out of 617 women, 25 women had a termination of pregnancy and 2 stillbirths at the time of birth and 10 babies were born with anomalies. That is 6 percent. Even with the data from Table 69 of the PSUR#3, there cannot and should not be a vaccination recommendation in the case of the identified risk of harm. 2. package insert from BioNTech for the Omicron vaccination page 2: "Pregnancy and breastfeeding" If you are pregnant or think you may be pregnant, tell your doctor, healthcare professional or pharmacist before receiving this vaccine. No data are yet available on the use of Comirnaty Omicron XBB.1.5 during pregnancy." There is an increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis as well as heavy menstrual bleeding. 3. breastfeeding mothers transfer modRNA to their babies while breastfeeding. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36156636/ 4 BioNTech and Pfizer discontinued the studies with vaccinations in pregnant women because they were too shocking. Therefore, BioNTech was never able to deliver the safety reports for pregnant women. 5. A summarized scientific study on the effects of BNT162b2 in pregnancy and on menstruation. https://jpands.org/vol28no1/thorp.pdf 6. lipid nanoparticles and ModRNA enter the placenta. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36597546/ 7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36789893/ 8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21342124/ 9. apoptosis (programmed cell death) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26526105/ 10. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33523869/ 11. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22052087/ 12. One of the most shocking documents is this one, which shows what they did to the women in the study and why the study was stopped. https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/125742_S2_M1_pllr-cumulative-review.pdf?ref=VFOX 13. https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M5_5351_c4591001-interim-mth6-protocol.pdf?ref=VFOX 14. Archive of clinical studies on BNT162b2 https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/history/NCT04754594?V_21=View#StudyPageTop 15. What happens to the newborns if the mothers have been vaccinated. A study on this: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2810937 So now everyone can judge the balance of the article. A society that accepts such reporting without reaction is no longer mine. #crime #pregnantwomen #vaccination #placenta #fetus #miscarriage #deadbirth #vaccinedamage #sideeffects 8:38 pm. - Nov. 14, 2023 -
@rosenbusch_ - henning rosenbusch
***** ***** ***** ***** ********** ******** ******* ******. ****. https://www.mdr.de/wissen/corona-impfung-schwangere-frauen-wann-schutz-fuer-kinder-100.html t.me/Rosenbusch
@FreeWCH - World Council for Health (WCH)
Dr Mark Trozzi has published an organized library of more than 1,000 peer reviewed articles which show that Covid-19 "vaccines" are harmful. Please do bookmark and share this page for ongoing reference. ➡️ https://drtrozzi.org/2023/09/28/1000-peer-reviewed-articles-on-vaccine-injuries/
@gatewaypundit - The Gateway Pundit
Groundbreaking Global Study on 99 Million Vaccinated People Reveals Increases in Neurological, Blood, and Heart Conditions Associated with COVID-19 Vaccines via @gatewaypundit https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/02/groundbreaking-global-study-99-million-vaccinated-people-reveals/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=groundbreaking-global-study-99-million-vaccinated-people-reveals
@CartlandDavid - Dr David Cartland
Bombshell Study: We now have 100% Scientific Proof why the Jabbed are Dying Suddenly https://rumble.com/v4bxk9r-bombshell-study-we-now-have-100-scientific-proof-why-the-jabbed-are-dying-s.html
@basedmnm - Based Memes News and Music
@MikeDonio https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7268563/ https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12026-013-8403-1 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0162013411002212
@newstart_2024 - Camus
A large-scale study of two million vaccinated people has uncovered evidence that Covid mRNA shots trigger psychiatric adverse events. The peer-reviewed study was conducted by top Korean scientists and published in the world-renowned Nature Journal. Led by Eun Mi Chu from the School of Medicine Ewha Womans University in Seoul, South Korea, the team of researchers analyzed the data of two million Korean citizens who had received at least one dose of a Covid mRNA shot. The study looked into serious adverse events (AEs) of a psychiatric nature linked to COVID-19 vaccination. The researchers noted that, while evidence associated with an increased risk of psychiatric manifestations does exist after viral infections including COVID-19, such incidence–psychiatric adverse events (AEs) post COVID-19 vaccination as documented in various studies and reports is less clear. Enter this study, an investigation probing for psychiatric AEs after COVID-19 vaccination from a large population-based cohort in Seoul, South Korea. The researchers employed statistical tools such as hazard ratios in a population of over 2 million Koreans to determine COVID-19 vaccination is associated with several psychiatric events. This is an observational study not designed to prove causation. The team used real-world official government data in the Korean National Health Insurance Service (KNHIS) claims database starting January 1, 2021. The study investigators recruited 50% of this Seoul-resident population randomly selected. The vast majority of Korean adults were vaccinated against COVID-19. Multiple vaccines were used in Korea with the majority of doses being represented by the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine. The study population included a total of 2,027,353 participants from the KNHIS claims database.
@newstart_2024 - Camus
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41380-024-02627-0#Fig3 https://slaynews.com/news/major-study-covid-shots-trigger-psychiatric-adverse-events/
@McCulloughFund - McCullough Foundation
BREAKING - In a major win against censorship, the landmark study that was unethically retracted after hundreds of thousands of views and called for global moratorium on COVID-19 mRNA injections has been re-published. "Rigorous re-analyses of trial data and post-marketing surveillance studies indicate a substantial degree of modmRNA-related harms than was initially reported. Confidential Pfizer documents had revealed 1.6 million adverse events by August 2022. A third were serious injuries to cardiovascular, neurological, thrombotic, immunological, and reproductive systems, along with an alarming increase in cancers." "Well-designed studies have shown that repeated modmRNA injections cause immune dysfunction, thereby potentially contributing to heightened susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infections and increased risks of COVID-19." Re-published study: https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/101 Retracted (censored) study: https://www.cureus.com/articles/203052-covid-19-mrna-vaccines-lessons-learned-from-the-registrational-trials-and-global-vaccination-campaign#!/ #MFScholar
@newstart_2024 - Camus
A team of leading scientific researchers in Germany has just issued a warning to the public after finding direct links between Covid mRNA shots and vital organ damage among children. Specifically, the researchers found that Pfizer’s mRNA injection is responsible for skyrocketing cases of Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) in children aged 5 to 11 years old. IgG4-RD is a condition that causes inflammation inside the body and damages internal organs, according to Oxford University. It can affect many different organs, meaning people can have wide-ranging symptoms. The pancreas is most commonly affected, followed by the bile ducts in the liver, the salivary glands, and the kidneys. It is difficult to diagnose as there is no single test so it can often go unrecorded. Led by physician-investigator Dr. Robin Kobbe of the University Medical Center Hamburg, the study sought to identify the cause of a surge in IgG4-RD in children. The study, published in the Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, found that Pfizer’s Covid mRNA shot caused the risk of IgG4-RD to spike one year after the second dose of the injection. Kobbe and his team warn that the timespan between the injection and diagnoses may have previously made it difficult for doctors to link the shot to cases of IgG4-RD. The German team is now raising the alarm about the importance of better understanding mRNA vaccine–specific IgG4 responses in all age groups. They note that the anticipated growth in mRNA vaccines heading toward licensure is of grave concern. While this German study finds a spike in organ damage in children 1 year after being injected with a Covid shot, comparable findings have been reported in adults. The researchers warn that further investigations must be conducted to analyze the risks on a population level.
@newstart_2024 - Camus
https://journals.lww.com/pidj/fulltext/9900/delayed_induction_of_noninflammatory_sars_cov_2.959.aspx https://slaynews.com/news/top-study-links-covid-shots-surge-organ-damage-among-children/
@MeasslainteIRL - TAE III 1215 🍀
#metaanalysis #ExcessDeaths #NL #Netherlands 🇳🇱🇳🇱🇳🇱🇳🇱 The research report examines a potential relationship between COVID-19 vaccinations and excess mortality in the Netherlands, led by Ronald Meester and Dr. Marc Jacobs, is now available online: Research Report: https://researchgate.net/publication/383239838_Eindverslag_van_het_onderzoek_naar_een_mogelijke_relatie_tussen_Covid-19_vaccinaties_en_oversterfte_in_Nederland_2021_-_2023?channel=doi&linkId=66c45cd6bcb6b956be01af9c&showFulltext=true… This comprehensive study was made possible through a crowdfunding initiative by Stichting De Menselijke Maat. Alongside Dr. Marc Jacobs and Ronald Meester, the core research team included Bram Bakker, Jona Walk, and Jan Bonte. Given its depth, the report is extensive. Below is a concise overview of its key findings: Chapter 1: Introduces the study and provides a justification for the research. Chapter 2: Discusses excess mortality in the Netherlands, noting significant quantitative and qualitative changes since 2021. Chapter 3: Presents data from AstraZeneca and the European Medicines Agency (EMA), raising concerns regarding vaccine safety. Chapter 4: Covers their literature review and meta-analysis attempt. Out of 13,430 publications reviewed, only 83 met their stringent content and quality criteria. This finding suggests that "following the science" during the pandemic may not have always been prudent, given the varying efficacy rates and large uncertainty margins reported in the remaining studies. Chapter 5: Focuses on a macro-level analysis of mortality related to vaccination. The findings suggest that vaccine effectiveness in the first four weeks post-administration may be negative, although the researchers exercise caution in their interpretations. Chapter 6: Delves into micro-data from the Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (CBS) at an individual level. The researchers identified significant data artifacts that have potentially skewed all previous studies by both CBS and the RIVM (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment). The team refrains from speculating on the origins of this data contamination. Chapter 7: Examines the reliability of the data used in their analysis, particularly focusing on CIMS and EMA data, which they found to be contaminated. This contamination complicates research efforts significantly. Chapter 8: Explores the medical aspects of COVID-19 vaccinations, concluding that while side effects exist, their full extent remains unclear. Chapter 9: Summarizes the research conclusions and offers recommendations for future studies. This research represents a substantial contribution to the ongoing discussion about vaccine safety and public health during the COVID-19 pandemic. All research transactions and data can be accessed through the following GitHub repository: GitHub Repository: https://github.com/MJacobs1985/Oversterfte_vaccinatie @RonaldMeester #ExcessMortality #Covid_19 #vaccine
@MeasslainteIRL - TAE III 1215 🍀
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dr-marc-jacobs-885b1430_pdf-eindverslag-van-het-onderzoek-naar-activity-7231600271410229249-sH3H?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_android Dr Jacobs is a data scientist/ statistical consultant. Subject matter experts are finding their voice.
@MeasslainteIRL - TAE III 1215 🍀
Broken into layman's for everyone to enjoy. Title: Uncovering the Truth: A Deep Dive into COVID-19 Vaccines and Excess Mortality in the Netherlands Introduction In the wake of the global COVID-19 pandemic, nations worldwide rushed to develop and distribute vaccines in hopes of curbing the spread of the virus and reducing mortality rates. The Netherlands, like many other countries, embarked on an ambitious vaccination campaign. However, as the dust began to settle, an unsettling pattern emerged: despite widespread vaccination, the country continued to experience unexplained excess mortality. This puzzling phenomenon has sparked intense debate and raised crucial questions about the relationship between COVID-19 vaccines and overall mortality rates. In response to these concerns, a team of dedicated researchers, led by Ronald Meester and Marc Jacobs, undertook a comprehensive investigation. Their findings, detailed in a 166-page report, challenge many widely held beliefs about vaccine safety and efficacy. Today, we'll take you on a journey through this groundbreaking research, breaking down complex scientific concepts into digestible insights that could reshape our understanding of public health policies and vaccine impacts. The Unexpected Persistence of Excess Mortality Before we delve into the heart of the research, let's first understand what we mean by "excess mortality." Simply put, excess mortality refers to the number of deaths from all causes during a crisis that exceeds what we would have expected under 'normal' conditions. It's a crucial metric in public health, often used to assess the full impact of pandemics or other widespread health crises. In the Netherlands, a troubling trend emerged following the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines. Instead of seeing a reduction in overall mortality as vaccination rates increased, the country continued to experience higher-than-expected death rates. This persistence of excess mortality, even as COVID-19 cases declined, raised red flags for our research team. Key questions emerged: 1. Could there be a connection between the COVID-19 vaccines and this ongoing excess mortality? 2. If such a connection exists, what mechanisms might be at play? 3. How reliable is the data we're using to make these assessments? With these questions in mind, let's explore the key findings of this extensive research. 1. The Data Dilemma: Uncovering Inconsistencies At the heart of any scientific investigation lies data - the foundation upon which conclusions are built and policies are shaped. However, our research team uncovered troubling inconsistencies in the datasets provided by key institutions, including the CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics), RIVM (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment), and EMA (European Medicines Agency). These discrepancies aren't merely academic concerns. They strike at the very core of how we assess vaccine safety and efficacy. Let's break down some of the key issues: a) Disappearing Data: The team observed that in the EMA database, which tracks vaccine-related adverse events, some reports seemed to vanish over time. By regularly downloading and comparing datasets, the researchers noticed a consistent pattern of record removal. This raises serious questions about data integrity and the completeness of our understanding of vaccine side effects. b) Misclassification Concerns: One of the most alarming findings related to the classification of vaccinated individuals. The research suggests that some people who died shortly after receiving a vaccine may have been incorrectly classified as "unvaccinated" in official records. This potential misclassification could significantly skew our understanding of vaccine-related risks.
@MeasslainteIRL - TAE III 1215 🍀
c) Incomplete Reporting: The team found evidence suggesting that adverse events, including deaths, following vaccination might be substantially underreported. This underreporting could lead to an overestimation of vaccine safety and an underestimation of potential risks. To illustrate the magnitude of these data issues, let's consider a specific example from the report: In the weeks following vaccination rounds, the research team observed a sharp spike in mortality among those classified as "unvaccinated." This pattern was consistent across different age groups and vaccination phases. While various factors could contribute to this trend, one possible explanation is the misclassification of recently vaccinated individuals who died shortly after receiving the vaccine. These data inconsistencies highlight a crucial point: the foundation upon which many vaccine safety claims are built may be shakier than previously thought. It underscores the need for more transparent, accurate, and comprehensive data collection and reporting mechanisms. 2. The Healthy Vaccinee Effect: A Hidden Confounder As we dig deeper into the research findings, we encounter a phenomenon known as the "Healthy Vaccinee Effect" (HVE). This effect, while not new to epidemiologists, played a significant role in potentially skewing our understanding of vaccine effectiveness in the context of COVID-19. What is the Healthy Vaccinee Effect? The Healthy Vaccinee Effect occurs when healthier individuals are more likely to get vaccinated than those who are less healthy. This can happen for various reasons: 1. Health-conscious individuals may be more proactive about getting vaccinated. 2. Very ill or frail individuals might be advised against vaccination or choose not to get vaccinated. 3. People with certain pre-existing conditions might be more hesitant about receiving new vaccines. Why does this matter? The HVE can lead to an overestimation of vaccine effectiveness. If healthier people are more likely to be vaccinated, they're also less likely to die or experience severe illness in general. This can create the illusion that the vaccine is more effective at preventing death or severe illness than it actually is. The research team found strong evidence of a significant HVE in the Netherlands' COVID-19 vaccination campaign. Even after attempting to control for various factors, the vaccinated group appeared to have lower mortality rates from causes unrelated to COVID-19. To illustrate this, let's look at a hypothetical example: Imagine we have two groups of 1000 people each: Group A: Mostly healthy individuals who chose to get vaccinated Group B: A mix of healthy and less healthy individuals who didn't get vaccinated Over a year, we might see something like this: Group A (Vaccinated): 5 deaths (0.5% mortality rate) Group B (Unvaccinated): 15 deaths (1.5% mortality rate) At first glance, it might appear that the vaccine reduced mortality by 66%. However, if Group A was healthier to begin with, some or all of this difference might be due to their better overall health, not the vaccine's effectiveness. The research team found patterns in the data suggesting that this effect may have significantly inflated perceived vaccine effectiveness in previous studies. This doesn't mean the vaccines aren't effective, but it does suggest that their impact on overall mortality might be less dramatic than initially reported.
@MeasslainteIRL - TAE III 1215 🍀
3. The Mortality Mystery: Unexpected Patterns Emerge One of the most striking findings of the research relates to mortality patterns following vaccination rounds. The team observed a consistent and alarming trend: sharp increases in mortality among those classified as "unvaccinated" immediately following periods of intense vaccination activity. Let's break this down: a) The Unexpected Spike: During and immediately after periods when large numbers of people were being vaccinated, there was a noticeable increase in deaths among those classified as unvaccinated. This spike was far above what would be expected based on historical mortality data for similar time periods. b) Timing and Consistency: This pattern wasn't a one-off occurrence. It was observed consistently across different age groups and during different phases of the vaccination campaign. The spikes in mortality among the "unvaccinated" aligned closely with the timing of vaccination efforts for each age group. c) Magnitude of the Effect: In some cases, the mortality rate among the "unvaccinated" during these periods was several times higher than what would be considered normal for that age group and time of year. What could explain this pattern? The researchers propose several potential explanations, each with significant implications: 1. Data Misclassification: One possibility is that some individuals who died shortly after vaccination were incorrectly classified as "unvaccinated" in the official records. This could happen if there was a delay in updating vaccination status in the central database, or if deaths occurring very soon after vaccination weren't properly linked to the individual's vaccination record. 2. Immediate Post-Vaccination Vulnerability: Another hypothesis is that there might be a period of increased vulnerability immediately following vaccination. If this were the case, and if such deaths were not properly attributed to the vaccinated group, it could create the observed pattern. 3. Unaccounted Confounding Factors: There might be other factors at play that the current data collection and analysis methods aren't capturing. For instance, if vaccination campaigns coincided with other events or conditions that increased mortality risk, it could potentially create this pattern. To illustrate the magnitude of this effect, let's look at a specific example from the report: For the birth cohort 1940-1950 (people aged 71-81 at the time), the mortality rate among the "unvaccinated" in the four weeks following the peak of their vaccination campaign was a staggering 8.59%. This is compared to a rate of 0.14% among the vaccinated group in the same period. Such a massive difference is difficult to explain through conventional understanding of vaccine effects and normal mortality patterns. This finding raises crucial questions: 1. Are we accurately capturing and classifying deaths in relation to vaccination status? 2. Could there be immediate risks associated with vaccination that aren't being properly monitored or reported? 3. How might this pattern impact our understanding of vaccine effectiveness and safety? The researchers stress that while these patterns are clear in the data, determining causality requires further investigation. However, the consistency and magnitude of these mortality spikes demand serious attention and further study. 4. Reassessing Vaccine Effectiveness: A Paradigm Shift One of the most challenging aspects of the research findings relates to vaccine effectiveness. Since the beginning of the vaccination campaign, public health officials and media outlets have consistently cited high effectiveness rates, often quoting figures around 95% effectiveness against severe COVID-19.
@MeasslainteIRL - TAE III 1215 🍀
However, the team's analysis suggests a more complex and potentially concerning picture. Let's unpack this: a) Overall Mortality vs. COVID-19 Specific Mortality: While most effectiveness studies focused on prevention of COVID-19 related deaths, this research looked at overall mortality. The distinction is crucial. A vaccine might be effective at preventing deaths from COVID-19 specifically, but if it has other effects that increase mortality from other causes, its net benefit could be reduced or even negated. b) Age-Dependent Effectiveness: The research suggests that vaccine effectiveness varies significantly across age groups. While older age groups showed some benefit in terms of reduced overall mortality (though less than previously reported), younger age groups showed little to no benefit, and in some analyses, even a potential increase in mortality risk. c) Time-Dependent Effects: The team's analysis indicates that whatever protective effect the vaccines might offer wanes significantly over time. This aligns with other international studies but raises questions about the long-term benefits of vaccination, especially for younger, healthier individuals. d) The Role of Natural Immunity: The research also touches on the complex interplay between vaccine-induced immunity and natural immunity from prior infection. The data suggests that in some cases, natural immunity might provide comparable or even superior protection against severe outcomes. To illustrate these points, let's look at a hypothetical scenario based on the research findings: Imagine we're tracking two groups of 10,000 people each over a year: Group A: Vaccinated individuals Group B: Unvaccinated individuals In the 60+ age group, we might see something like this: Group A: 100 deaths (1% mortality rate) Group B: 150 deaths (1.5% mortality rate) This suggests a 33% reduction in overall mortality, which is significant but far less than the 95% effectiveness often quoted for preventing severe COVID-19. Now, let's look at a younger age group, say 18-40: Group A: 10 deaths (0.1% mortality rate) Group B: 9 deaths (0.09% mortality rate) In this case, we see no clear benefit in terms of overall mortality, and potentially even a slight increase (though the numbers are too small to be statistically significant on their own). The researchers stress that these findings don't mean the vaccines are ineffective or dangerous for everyone. Rather, they suggest that the benefits and risks may vary significantly based on factors like age, health status, and prior exposure to the virus. This nuanced understanding of vaccine effectiveness has important implications: 1. It challenges the one-size-fits-all approach to vaccination policies. 2. It suggests that the risk-benefit calculation for vaccination might be different for different age groups and individuals. 3. It underscores the need for more personalized medical advice regarding vaccination, especially for younger, healthier individuals. 5. Heart of the Matter: Cardiovascular Concerns One of the most specific and concerning findings of the research relates to cardiovascular health, particularly among younger individuals. The team observed an increase in heart-related hospital diagnoses following vaccination, a trend that aligns with emerging global research on myocarditis risks associated with mRNA vaccines. Let's break this down: a) Increased Diagnoses: The data showed a notable increase in hospital diagnoses for conditions like myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle), pericarditis (inflammation of the protective sac around the heart), and other cardiovascular issues following vaccination campaigns. b) Age-Specific Patterns: This increase was particularly pronounced in younger age groups, especially those under 40. This aligns with other international studies that have identified young males as being at higher risk for these complications.
@MeasslainteIRL - TAE III 1215 🍀
c) Temporal Relationship: The spikes in these diagnoses correlated closely with vaccination timelines, suggesting a potential causal relationship. However, the researchers stress that correlation doesn't necessarily imply causation, and more investigation is needed. d) Long-term Implications: While most cases of vaccine-associated myocarditis appear to be mild and resolve on their own, the long-term implications of these heart issues remain unknown. This uncertainty is particularly concerning when considering vaccination of young, healthy individuals who are at low risk from COVID-19 itself. To illustrate the significance of these findings, let's consider a hypothetical scenario based on the research: Imagine we're tracking heart-related hospital admissions for people aged 18-30 in a city of 1 million people: Pre-vaccination period (3 months): - Average monthly admissions for myocarditis/pericarditis: 10 cases Post-vaccination period (3 months): - Month 1 (peak vaccination): 30 cases - Month 2: 25 cases - Month 3: 15 cases This hypothetical scenario shows a clear spike in cases coinciding with the vaccination campaign, followed by a gradual return to baseline. While the numbers might seem small, they represent a significant increase in relative risk, especially for a young, healthy population. The researchers highlight several important considerations regarding these cardiovascular findings: 1. Risk vs. Benefit: For young, healthy individuals at low risk from COVID-19, even a small increase in cardiovascular risk could potentially outweigh the benefits of vaccination. 2. Underreporting Concerns: The team suggests that these cases might be underreported, as mild cases might not result in hospital admission and could be missed in the data. 3. Need for Long-term Follow-up: Given the novelty of the mRNA vaccines and the uncertainty surrounding long-term effects of myocarditis, ongoing monitoring and research are crucial. 4. Implications for Booster Policies: These findings raise questions about the wisdom of repeated booster doses, especially for younger age groups. The cardiovascular concerns highlighted in this research underscore the need for a more nuanced, personalized approach to vaccination policies. They also emphasize the importance of transparent communication about potential risks, allowing individuals and their healthcare providers to make informed decisions based on personal risk profiles. 6. The Immune System Puzzle: Unintended Consequences? One of the most intriguing and potentially far-reaching aspects of the research relates to the broader effects of COVID-19 vaccines on the immune system. The team's findings suggest that these vaccines might have more complex interactions with our immune defenses than initially thought, potentially affecting our ability to fight off other infections or diseases.
@MeasslainteIRL - TAE III 1215 🍀
Let's unpack this complex topic: a) Non-Specific Effects of Vaccines: The researchers discuss a phenomenon known as "non-specific effects" of vaccines. This refers to the idea that vaccines can have broader impacts on the immune system beyond just protecting against their target disease. These effects can be both positive and negative. b) Altered Immune Responses: Some data suggest that COVID-19 vaccines might alter how our immune system responds to other pathogens. This could potentially make us more susceptible to certain infections while possibly offering enhanced protection against others. c) Interference with Natural Immunity: There's evidence that vaccination might interfere with the development of broad, natural immunity that typically occurs after infection. This could have implications for long-term immune protection against COVID-19 and its variants. d) Age-Dependent Effects: The research indicates that these immune system effects might vary significantly based on age, with potentially different outcomes for children, adults, and the elderly. To illustrate these concepts, let's consider a hypothetical scenario: Imagine we're tracking infections in two groups of 1000 people over six months following a COVID-19 vaccination campaign: Group A: Vaccinated against COVID-19 Group B: Unvaccinated We might see something like this: COVID-19 infections: Group A: 10 cases Group B: 50 cases This aligns with expected vaccine effectiveness. But now let's look at other infections: Influenza infections: Group A: 40 cases Group B: 30 cases Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) infections: Group A: 25 cases Group B: 20 cases This hypothetical scenario illustrates the complex nature of immune system interactions. While the vaccine appears effective against COVID-19, it might inadvertently affect susceptibility to other infections. The researchers highlight several important considerations regarding these immune system findings: 1. Balanced Assessment: It's crucial to consider both the intended and unintended effects of vaccines on the immune system. A vaccine that protects against one disease but increases susceptibility to others may not provide a net benefit, especially for low-risk individuals. 2. Age-Specific Strategies: Given that these effects appear to vary by age, vaccination strategies may need to be tailored for different age groups. What's beneficial for an elderly person might not be appropriate for a child. 3. Long-term Monitoring: The full impact of these immune system changes may only become apparent over time. Long-term studies are essential to understand the broader health implications of mass vaccination. 4. Implications for Future Pandemics: Understanding these non-specific effects could be crucial for preparing for future pandemics. If vaccines alter our immune responses in complex ways, this needs to be factored into public health strategies. The immune system findings in this research underscore the intricate nature of our body's defenses and the potential for unintended consequences when we intervene. They highlight the need for a more holistic approach to vaccine assessment, one that considers not just the target disease but overall health outcomes. 7. The Booster Dilemma: Diminishing Returns? As the pandemic progressed and vaccine effectiveness appeared to wane, many countries, including the Netherlands, implemented booster shot programs. The research team took a close look at the impact of these booster campaigns, and their findings raise important questions about the long-term strategy of repeated vaccinations. Key points from the booster analysis include: a) Short-term Effectiveness: The data suggest that booster shots did provide a short-term increase in protection against severe COVID-19, particularly for older and vulnerable populations.
@MeasslainteIRL - TAE III 1215 🍀
b) Rapidly Waning Protection: However, this boosted protection appeared to decline rapidly, often within a few months. This calls into question the sustainability of a strategy relying on frequent booster shots. c) Diminishing Returns: Each subsequent booster shot seemed to offer less additional protection than the previous one. This suggests a law of diminishing returns when it comes to repeated vaccinations. d) Potential Immune System Fatigue: Some data points hinted at the possibility of "immune system fatigue" with repeated boosters, where the body's immune response becomes less robust over time. e) Age-Dependent Effects: As with the initial vaccination series, the benefits and risks of boosters appeared to vary significantly by age group. To illustrate these concepts, let's consider a hypothetical scenario based on the research findings: Imagine we're tracking COVID-19 hospitalizations in a group of 10,000 people aged 65 and older over a year: After initial vaccination series: - Months 1-3: 50 hospitalizations - Months 4-6: 100 hospitalizations (protection waning) After first booster: - Months 7-9: 30 hospitalizations (improved protection) - Months 10-12: 80 hospitalizations (protection waning again) After second booster: - Months 13-15: 40 hospitalizations (less improvement than first booster) - Months 16-18: 75 hospitalizations (protection waning faster) This scenario illustrates the initial effectiveness of boosters, but also the diminishing returns and faster waning of protection with each subsequent shot. The researchers highlight several important considerations regarding booster campaigns: 1. Targeted Approach: Given the varying risk profiles across age groups, a more targeted approach to boosters may be warranted, focusing on those most at risk of severe COVID-19. 2. Timing Considerations: The rapid waning of booster effectiveness suggests that timing is crucial. Administering boosters too frequently might not be beneficial and could potentially be counterproductive. 3. Long-term Sustainability: A strategy relying on frequent boosters for the entire population may not be sustainable in the long term, both from a public health and an economic perspective. 4. Alternative Strategies: The findings suggest a need to explore alternative strategies for long-term COVID-19 management, such as developing more broadly effective vaccines or focusing on treatments. The booster dilemma highlighted in this research underscores the complexity of managing a long-term pandemic response. It suggests that while boosters can play a role in protecting vulnerable populations, they may not be a one-size-fits-all solution for ongoing COVID-19 management. 8. Data Transparency and Integrity: A Call to Action Throughout their investigation, the research team encountered significant challenges related to data accessibility, consistency, and transparency. These issues not only hampered their analysis but also raised broader concerns about the foundation upon which many public health decisions are being made. Key issues identified include: a) Limited Access to Raw Data: The team found it difficult to access complete, raw datasets from official sources. This lack of access makes it challenging for independent researchers to verify official claims or conduct their own analyses. b) Inconsistencies Across Datasets: When comparing data from different sources (e.g., CBS, RIVM, EMA), the team found concerning inconsistencies. These discrepancies make it difficult to draw reliable conclusions and raise questions about data quality. c) Changing Definitions and Metrics: Throughout the pandemic, definitions for key metrics (e.g., what constitutes a COVID-19 death, or who is considered "fully vaccinated") have changed. These shifting goalposts complicate long-term trend analysis.
@MeasslainteIRL - TAE III 1215 🍀
d) Potential Underreporting: The research suggests that adverse events following vaccination, including deaths, may be substantially underreported. This could lead to an overestimation of vaccine safety. e) Lack of Granularity: In many cases, the available data lacked the granularity needed for detailed analysis. For example, precise timing of vaccination in relation to subsequent health events was often not available. To illustrate the importance of data transparency, let's consider a hypothetical scenario: Imagine two research teams analyzing vaccine effectiveness: Team A: Has access only to aggregated, publicly available data. Team B: Has access to raw, granular data including detailed individual health records. Team A's Conclusion: "Vaccine effectiveness against severe COVID-19 is 90% across all age groups." Team B's Conclusion: "Vaccine effectiveness varies significantly by age: 95% for 65+, 80% for 40-64, and 50% for under 40. We also found a 3-fold increase in non-COVID hospitalizations in the week following vaccination in the under-40 group." This scenario illustrates how limited data access can lead to oversimplified or potentially misleading conclusions. The researchers emphasize several key points regarding data transparency: 1. Public Trust: Transparent, accessible data is crucial for maintaining public trust in health institutions and policies. 2. Scientific Integrity: Open access to raw data allows for peer review and validation, cornerstones of scientific integrity. 3. Informed Decision Making: Granular, accurate data is essential for making informed personal and policy decisions about vaccination and other health interventions. 4. Continuous Improvement: Transparent data sharing allows for continuous refinement of analysis methods and understanding, crucial in a rapidly evolving situation like a pandemic. The data transparency issues highlighted in this research underscore the need for a more open, collaborative approach to public health data. They suggest that improving data quality, accessibility, and transparency should be a priority for health authorities and policymakers.
@MeasslainteIRL - TAE III 1215 🍀
9. Media and Public Communication: Navigating Complexity The research team dedicates a significant portion of their report to discussing the role of media and public health communication during the pandemic. They argue that the way information about vaccines and COVID-19 has been presented to the public has often been oversimplified, potentially misleading, and at times, may have suppressed important scientific debate. Key points from this section include: a) Oversimplification of Complex Issues: The researchers note that media outlets often presented vaccine effectiveness and safety in black-and-white terms, failing to convey the nuances and uncertainties inherent in the scientific data. b) Inadequate Coverage of Adverse Events: There was a tendency in many media outlets to downplay or underreport potential vaccine side effects, possibly out of fear of fueling vaccine hesitancy. c) Stigmatization of Dissenting Voices: Scientists and medical professionals who raised concerns about vaccine policies or presented data challenging the mainstream narrative often faced criticism or marginalization. d) Lack of Context: Absolute risk reductions were rarely presented alongside the more impressive-sounding relative risk reductions, potentially skewing public perception of vaccine benefits.
@MeasslainteIRL - TAE III 1215 🍀
e) Evolving Science vs. Definitive Statements: Public health messaging often presented evolving scientific understanding as settled fact, potentially eroding public trust when guidance later changed. To illustrate these points, let's consider a hypothetical media report: Headline: "COVID-19 Vaccine 95% Effective, Experts Say" This headline, while technically accurate based on relative risk reduction in clinical trials, fails to convey important context: - It doesn't specify what the vaccine is 95% effective against (symptomatic infection? severe disease? death?). - It doesn't mention that this effectiveness may vary by age group or wane over time. - It doesn't provide the absolute risk reduction, which might be much less impressive (e.g., reducing risk from 1% to 0.05% is a 95% relative reduction but only a 0.95% absolute reduction). A more nuanced headline might read: "COVID-19 Vaccine Shown to Reduce Risk of Severe Disease by 95% in Short Term, Effects May Vary by Age and Over Time" The researchers emphasize several key points regarding media and public communication: 1. Balanced Reporting: Media should strive to present both benefits and potential risks of medical interventions, including vaccines. 2. Embracing Uncertainty: It's crucial to communicate the evolving nature of scientific understanding, especially in a novel situation like a pandemic. 3. Encouraging Scientific Debate: Open discussion of differing scientific viewpoints should be encouraged, not stigmatized. 4. Contextualizing Statistics: Providing context for statistical claims, including absolute risk reductions alongside relative risk reductions, is essential for public understanding. 5. Empowering Individual Decision-Making: Information should be presented in a way that allows individuals to make informed decisions based on their personal risk-benefit profile. The media and communication issues highlighted in this research underscore the challenges of conveying complex scientific information to the public. They suggest a need for more nuanced, context-rich public health communication strategies.
@MeasslainteIRL - TAE III 1215 🍀
Conclusion: Charting a Path Forward As we reach the end of our deep dive into this groundbreaking research, it's clear that the relationship between COVID-19 vaccines and excess mortality is far more complex than initially thought. The findings challenge many of our assumptions about vaccine effectiveness and safety, and raise important questions about our approach to public health during pandemics. Key takeaways include: 1. Data Integrity is Paramount: The inconsistencies and potential inaccuracies in official datasets underscore the need for more transparent, accurate, and comprehensive data collection and reporting. 2. One-Size-Fits-All Approaches Are Problematic: The varying impacts of vaccination across age groups and health statuses suggest a need for more personalized vaccination strategies. 3. Long-term Effects Require Ongoing Study: The potential for vaccines to have broader impacts on the immune system and overall health necessitates long-term, comprehensive follow-up studies. 4. Transparent Communication is Crucial: Both the scientific community and the media need to embrace more nuanced, balanced communication about the benefits and risks of medical interventions. 5. Scientific Debate Should Be Encouraged: Open discussion of differing viewpoints and interpretations of data is essential for advancing our understanding and making informed policy decisions. The researchers stress that their findings don't negate the important role vaccines have played in combating the COVID-19 pandemic. However, they argue that a more nuanced understanding of vaccine impacts is crucial for shaping future public health strategies. Looking ahead, the report calls for several key actions: 1. Comprehensive Review of Vaccine Policies: A thorough, independent review of current vaccination policies, taking into account the latest data on effectiveness, safety, and long-term impacts. 2. Enhanced Adverse Event Monitoring: Implementation of more robust systems for detecting and investigating potential vaccine side effects, including long-term effects. 3. Personalized Risk-Benefit Assessments: Development of tools to help individuals and healthcare providers make personalized decisions about vaccination based on individual risk profiles. 4. Improved Data Transparency: Creation of open-access databases with anonymized, granular health data to facilitate independent research and analysis. 5. Interdisciplinary Research Initiatives: Funding for collaborative research projects that bring together experts from virology, immunology, epidemiology, and other relevant fields to study the broader impacts of vaccination. As we navigate the ongoing challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic and prepare for future health crises, the insights from this research provide a valuable roadmap. They remind us of the importance of remaining open to new evidence, embracing scientific debate, and continuously refining our understanding and approaches. What are your thoughts on these findings? How do you think they should inform future public health policies? Share your views in the comments below, and let's continue this crucial conversation.
@MeasslainteIRL - TAE III 1215 🍀
Sources: 1. Meester, R., Jacobs, M., et al. (2024). "Eindverslag van het onderzoek naar een mogelijke relatie tussen Covid-19 vaccinaties en oversterfte in Nederland 2021 - 2023" 2. Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS) Netherlands, https://www.cbs.nl/ 3. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), https://www.rivm.nl/ 4. European Medicines Agency (EMA), https://www.ema.europa.eu/ 5. World Health Organization (WHO), https://www.who.int/ 6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), https://www.cdc.gov/ 7. The Lancet, https://www.thelancet.com/ 8. New England Journal of Medicine, https://www.nejm.org/ 9. British Medical Journal (BMJ), https://www.bmj.com/ 10. Nature, https://www.nature.com/
@MeasslainteIRL - TAE III 1215 🍀
Huge thanks to the scientists who made this work public and my friend @BoostImmuneBlog I hope this helps shed more light on the fraudulent and dangerous COVID 19 vaccine campaign https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eci.14286 #NoAmnesty @EU_IPO @DonnellyStephen @SimonHarrisTD @LeoVaradkar @EvaVlaar@AndersonAfDMdEP@JimFergusonUK@RealEddieHobbs #StopTheShots @Reseeit save thread
@MeasslainteIRL - TAE III 1215 🍀
@BoostImmuneBlog @EU_IPO @DonnellyStephen @SimonHarrisTD @LeoVaradkar @EMA_News @IMO_IRL @bmj_latest @Nature @hrw It's time for some accountability and maybe a lot of autopsies @pfizer @AstraZeneca @moderna_tx #StopTheShots
@MeasslainteIRL - TAE III 1215 🍀
@BoostImmuneBlog @EU_IPO @DonnellyStephen @SimonHarrisTD @LeoVaradkar @EMA_News @IMO_IRL @bmj_latest @Nature @hrw @pfizer @AstraZeneca @moderna_tx @reseeit save thread
@CartlandDavid - Dr David Cartland BMedSci MBChB MRCGP (2014)
It’s game over now for the pro jab camp. It’s irrefutable. It will go down in history as the biggest medical negligence case in loving history. You chose to stay silent. You chose money and reputation over patients/humanity….you chose to not follow the DUTY of candour and report correlations to harm from the jab formally and informally. Blood on hands up and down the globe! https://jpands.org/vol28no1/thorp.pdf https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00204-024-03912-1 https://mdpi.com/2227-9059/12/12/2852 https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/biontech-rna-based-covid-19-injections-contain-large-amounts-of-residual-dna-including-an-sv40-promoter-enhancer-sequence/ View of Potential Association of Covid-19 mRNA Vaccination and Infections with the Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/113 https://ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061025 https://zenodo.org/records/14269255 https://jpands.org/vol29no4/oldfield.pdf https://elsevier.es/es-revista-neurologia-english-edition--495-avance-resumen-thrombosis-with-thrombocytopenia-syndrome-following-S2173580824000828?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR0E1LCpLZCWIYL5_1epAUFzTpvBByFbp8w28SlrsWL1Yu_IGNY04J5HRDQ_aem_c9hw_1PiZeaketvy4GLIbA… https://strokejournal.org/article/S1052-3057(24)00556-1/fulltext… The bloodstream of mRNA vaccinated individuals (both Pfizer and Moderna) shows DNA expression vector contamination, including SV40 and kanamycin-resistant gene sequences (PDF) Sequencing of bivalent Moderna and Pfizer mRNA vaccines reveals nanogram to microgram quantities of expression vector dsDNA per dose Long‐lasting, biochemically modified mRNA, and its frameshifted recombinant spike proteins in human tissues and circulation after COVID‐19 vaccination - Boros - 2024 - Pharmacology Research & Perspectives - Wiley Online Library At Least 55 Undeclared Chemical Elements Found in COVID-19 Vaccines from AstraZeneca, CanSino, Moderna, Pfizer, Sinopharm and Sputnik V, with Precise ICP-MS | International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12979-024-00466-9 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39244425/ https://academic.oup.com/ofid/article/10/6/ofad209/7131292 "COVID-19 injection is strongly associated with a serious adverse safety signal of myocarditis, particularly in children and young adults resulting in hospitalization and death." Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis - PMC https://cureus.com/articles/313843-behavioral-and-health-outcomes-of-mrna-covid-19-vaccination-a-case-control-study-in-japanese-small-and-medium-sized-enterprises https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s15010-024-02427-2 https://bmj.com/content/384/bmj.q488 https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428332/ https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165572824001255#f0005… https://thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(24)00388-2/fulltext… COVID-19 vaccines and adverse events of special interest: A multinational Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) cohort study of 99 million vaccinated individuals - ScienceDirect https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10452662/ https://jiac-j.com/article/S1341-321X(24)00209-5/abstract… https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37544827/ The correlation between Australian Excess Deaths by State and Booster Vaccinations https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/5485 https://tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21645515.2024.2372149#d1e215… https://redirect.viglink.com/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.lww.com%2Fjcma%2Ffulltext%2F2024%2F02000%2Fthe_application_of_cardiac_magnetic_resonance.4.aspx&key=a7e37b5f6ff1de9cb410158b1013e54a&prodOvrd=RAC&opt=false… https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/104 The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal COVID-19 Modified mRNA “Vaccines”: Lessons Learned from Clinical Trials, Mass Vaccination, and the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex, Part 2 | International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research Frontiers | High serum prevalence of autoreactive IgG antibodies against peripheral nerve structures in patients with neurological post-COVID-19 vaccination syndrome
@CartlandDavid - Dr David Cartland BMedSci MBChB MRCGP (2014)
Medicina | Free Full-Text | Reports of Batch-Dependent Suspected Adverse Events of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine: Comparison of Results from Denmark and Sweden COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and effectiveness—the elephant (not) in the room - The Lancet Microbe https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/73 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.05.20.24306810v1 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-66999-7 Specific long‐term changes in anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 IgG modifications and antibody functions in mRNA, adenovector, and protein subunit vaccines - Reinig - 2024 - Journal of Medical Virology - Wiley Online Library https://academic.oup.com/qjmed/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/qjmed/hcae103/7684274 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-50656-8?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR0FNKElb5hkDcntZzI1vTQ2ah67hCTw9EAxok8QaDe-w-ZEfzPmr_fT1Lw_aem_ZVbgG978oxAddVoowoAunA https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.05.20.24306810v1 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-50656-8 https://correlation-canada.org/covid-excess-mortality-125-countries/ https://gh.bmj.com/content/7/5/e008684 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ehf2.14924 Clinical coding of long COVID in primary care 2020–2023 in a cohort of 19 million adults: an OpenSAFELY analysis - eClinicalMedicine https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11227084/ https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202406.2062/v1 https://thehopeaccord.org-/ https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202406.1236/v2 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38221509/ https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202403.0881/v1 https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2402379 https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/11/2/425 #. Long‐lasting, biochemically modified mRNA, and its frameshifted recombinant spike proteins in human tissues and circulation after COVID‐19 vaccination - Boros - 2024 - Pharmacology Research & Perspectives - Wiley Online Library https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7827936/ https://bmjpublichealth.bmj.com/content/2/1/e000282 https://academic.oup.com/qjmed/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/qjmed/hcae103/7684274 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666634024000801 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38834185/ (PDF) COVID-19 vaccine-associated mortality in the Southern Hemisphere https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2402379 https://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/S1876-2859(24)00273-0/fulltext https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/24/13/10514?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR1mTHIIMALFnToa4pFSA25UwL727cyT-BBrrPCOzX53adFN17gAIJxq9sg_aem_2Eq5JtcsQyZaPuydjnXTCQ https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/immunology/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2021.746021/full? https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.06.23.24309372v1#:~:text=Discussion%20Our%20findings%20indicate%20that,and%20on%20ethical%20medical%20practice https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202403.0881/v1 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378869803_US_-Death_Trends_for_Neoplasms_ICD_codes_C00-D48_Ages_15-44 https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202408.0821/v1 Outcome Reporting Bias in COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Clinical Trials - PMC https://mdpi-res.com/d_attachment/vaccines/vaccines-10-01651/article_deploy/vaccines-10-01651.pdf?version=1664615143 Post-COVID-19 Vaccination CNS Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings: A Systematic Review - PMC https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/batch-dependent-safety-of-the-bnt162b2-mrna-covid-19-vaccine-in-the-united-states/ Autoimmune and Neoplastic Outcomes After the mRNA Vaccination: The Role of T Regulatory Cell Response https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/112/356 https://mail.ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/111/353 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040595724001999
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
THE COVID INJECTIONS CAUSE AGGRESSIVE (TURBO) CANCERS EN MASSE: A MEGA-THREAD SHOWCASING THE OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE OF AN UNTHINKABLE HORROR THAT WILL TOUCH US ALL (1/57+)🧵 (Stick this thread on any post with a Community Note saying the injections don’t cause turbo cancers.) Thread index: Tweets 1–16: Physicians, Scientists, and Industry Experts—from the U.S., U.K., Canada, Germany, and Sweden—Describe How the COVID Injections Cause Turbo Cancers The injections— -Severely degrade the immune system, particularly causing T-cell suppression -Are adulterated with DNA plasmids, which contain the notorious SV40 promoter sequence, which has not only been associated with oncogenesis, but also binding with P53 a.k.a. “the guardian of the genome” -Are associated with far more aggressive cancers than what was normal prior to the injections’ rollout -Are associated with increasing rates of cancers Tweets 17–23: Anecdotal interviews with people describing aggressive cancers in themselves, their friends, or family members who’ve taken one or more COVID injections. Tweets 24–39: Evidence in the scientific literature and regulatory documentation that supports the idea that the COVID injections degrade the immune system, are capable of causing aggressive cancers, and contain DNA and SV40 contamination. Tweets 40–47: A—small—sample of the VAERS reports linking the COVID injections to various types of cancers. Tweets 48–57: Users on X speak out about themselves, family, or friends who developed an aggressive, often fatal, cancer following receipt of one or more COVID injections. NOTE: Please add your own COVID injection–related “turbo cancer” story to this thread to bolster the already overwhelming evidence that it is indeed a real phenomenon. —----------------------- DR. DAVID RASNICK—“I’m convinced that the true explanation of what’s behind turbo cancer is that these [COVID] injections…are devastating the immune system…[and] now we’re seeing a consequence of that devastated immune system.” In this first tweet, we start by hearing from cancer and AIDS research titan Dr. David Rasnick, who notes in a 2024 interview with Children’s Health Defense that this phenomenon of “turbo cancers” is new, and is defined by cancers that appear and grow to Stage 3 or Stage 4—i.e. “lethal”—in a matter of months. Rasnick, who earned a PhD in chemistry from the Georgia Institute of Technology in 1978, has more than 20 years of experience in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries, published numerous scientific papers, and invented novel laboratory techniques, notes that these turbo cancers are also affecting younger people than usual, including people in their 20s. “When it [the turbo cancer] develops, they get late stage cancer and they’re dead really, really quickly,” Rasnick says. “That is new.” Furthermore, Rasnick says the only other time these kinds of rapid-growing cancers have been observed was in lab animals that were made to be immune deficient “by design.” “I’m convinced that the true explanation of what’s behind turbo cancer,” Rasnick says, “is that these [COVID] injections…these mRNA and DNA genetic injections…are devastating the immune system…[and] now we’re seeing a consequence of that devastated immune system.” Rasnick adds, “Once your immune system is really, really depressed, now these things [cancers] can develop rapidly.” The cancer researcher adds, “We’re basically doing to human beings what we did to laboratory animals: We’re destroying their immune systems to the point where they can’t resist the cancer. And the cancers are now growing like they are in cell culture. They don’t have anything impeding their ability to proliferate.”
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(2/57) DR. RYAN COLE — “[These shots]...cause immune suppression. They cause a disruption and dysregulation of your immune system that normally is what would fight cancer.” In this clip from a 2023 interview with Greg Hunter, Dr. Ryan Cole, a board-certified pathologist and founder of Cole Diagnostics Inc. in Boise, Idaho, says that he saw early warning signs of immune system suppression following the rollout of the COVID injections and warned people that they “suppress the immune system.” Cole notes that the injections “alter the way your immune system works.” He adds that they “[put] your T cells to sleep” in such a way that they can’t perform their “surveillance” duties “to fight cancer.” The veteran pathologist adds that he has traveled the world, talking to oncologists, pathologists, family doctors, et al., who say that they’re “seeing cancers…in age groups…never seen before, and it happened after the rollout of the shots.” Cole adds that insurance datasets and some countries’ disability data confirms the huge uptick in cancers. In the U.K., for example, Cole says that in 2021, there was a 6–7% rise in cancers; in 2022, there was a staggering 35% increase. “Those are the types of data that we’re seeing that [are] really concerning,” Cole adds.
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(3/57) DR. ROGER HODKINSON— “The immune system has been taken off its watch…[there could be] a tsunami of…cancer and other conditions that have been brought on…by this vaccination program.” In this clip from a 2022 interview with the RAIR Foundation, Dr. Roger Hodkinson, a medical specialist in pathology, a graduate of Cambridge University, and a Fellow at the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (FRCPC), echoes Dr. Ryan Cole’s concerns regarding the COVID injections’ deleterious effects on the immune system. “One of the primary functions of the immune system is to surveil the entire body, looking for little, tiny cancers that can be knocked off before they get to a size when they produce a lump or a syndrome that kills you…[And] with the [COVID] vaccination, having a profound impact on the vitality of our immune system, the deep concern is that some of these cancers that are being reported, or maybe all of them, are due to immune escape,” Hodkinson says. The pathologist adds, “the immune system has been…taken off its watch…and the cancer has been allowed to proliferate in a way that it would not normally have done.” Hodkinson goes on to note: “[This] could result in a tsunami of…cancer and other conditions that have been brought on…by this vaccination program.” He adds, “When…something of this magnitude…is not studied, that is cause for enormous concern. Because that is not the way medicine works.”
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(4/57) SCIENTIST KEVIN MCKERNAN—”The EMA…has documents that have leaked showing a one to 815-fold variance in the amount of DNA contamination that are in these vaccines.” In this clip from a presentation given to the International COVID Summit in 2024, Kevin McKernan, Founder and Chief Scientific Officer of Medicinal Genomics, as well as former R&D lead of the Human Genome Project, describes how there is “DNA contamination” in the mRNA COVID injections from both Pfizer and Moderna. McKernan notes that there is DNA plasmid contamination of between one and 815-fold from injection lot to injection lot (i.e. batch to batch) and that the contamination has been found by scientists in multiple states in the U.S. and in Germany. (The one to 815-fold figure means that the amount of DNA plasmids present in a given injection is up to 815 times the allowable amount set by regulatory agencies.) McKernan notes that regulators have, in turn, been forced to respond to the contamination and that the FDA in the U.S., the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and Health Canada have all confirmed that there is indeed DNA plasmids in the COVID mRNA injections. McKernan notes that the regulators have also confirmed that this DNA contamination includes the so-called “SV40 promoter,” which is a DNA sequence derived from the Simian Virus 40 that enhances gene expression. I.e. the SV40 promoter helps to import the contaminating DNA plasmids into the nucleus of the cell. Furthermore, McKernan notes that the inclusion of the SV40 in the contaminating DNA plasmids was originally withheld from the regulators by Pfizer. Note that, as outlined in the documentation in tweet 39 in this mega-thread, an FDA guidance document published back in 2010 states the following: “Residual DNA might be a risk to your final product because of oncogenic [i.e. cancer causing] and/or infectivity potential. There are several potential mechanisms by which residual DNA could be oncogenic, including the integration and expression of encoded oncogenes or insertional mutagenesis following DNA integration.”
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(5/57) PROF. ANGUS DALGLEISH—“[The] synthetic DNA contamination…in…vials of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines…presents risks of genomic instability, which can manifest as cancers…” Professor Angus Dalgleish, a professor of oncology at St. George’s, University of London, describes in a presentation given to the Special Council at Port Hedland Town in Western Australia in 2024 how the DNA contamination found in the COVID mRNA injections by McKernan, et al. “can manifest as cancers, immune disorders, and hereditary diseases.” “Synthetic DNA contamination as detected in Australian vials of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines by David Speicher presents risks of genomic instability, which can manifest as cancers, immune disorders, and hereditary diseases,” Dalgleish says. “The vaccines contain lipid nanoparticles, which encapsulate synthetic DNA fragments. These nanoparticles deliver this DNA into various organs throughout the body, where the DNA has the potential to integrate into our own genetic material. As such these vaccines are not ‘vaccines,’ they are, in fact, gene therapy based. This genomic integration, as the scientific literature makes clear, can lead to cancer development, immune system disruption, and more. The sheer levels of contamination detected…in some cases are extraordinary, and far beyond what should be allowed in any medicinal product.” Dalgleish goes on to note: “While this may sound like a remote possibility…we are already seeing evidence of these effects in real patients. In my work as an oncologist in the U.K., I started to see a disturbing trend as early as February 2022. Patients who had been cancer free for many years were suddenly relapsing with aggressive, explosive cancers shortly after receiving booster doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. I personally counted six cases in as many weeks in patients who developed a rapid progression, having been completely stable, with zero disease, having been on an immunotherapy I had given them 5, 8, 10, 15, 18 years ago.” Dalgleish adds: “All these patients only had one thing in common, and that was they had all been forced to have a [COVID-injection] booster by their GPs on the grounds they were at risk. One of the most unsettling aspects of the nature of these cancers is that they are not slow progressing…they are aggressive, often presenting at advanced stages, affecting multiple organs by the time they are diagnosed. Colorectal cancer has specifically shown explosive growth—something we’ve never seen before. These cancers are emerging faster and more virulent than we would expect in patients who otherwise have been stable.” Dalgleish also notes a rise in blood cancers, such as leukemias and lymphomas, which have “appeared shortly after vaccinations.” “I have had many colleagues and patients express concerns about the timing of these cancers following what I believe are totally unnecessary boosters, which is not an isolated issue,” the oncologist goes on to say. “My own research has shown that the boosters suppress the T cell response and switch[es] the antibody response to tolerizing. That means this is the perfect example where you have switched off the policing of foreign invaders, viruses, etc. and cancer, allowing it to grow uncontrolled.”
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(6/57) DR. UTE KRÜGER—“Ultimately, I saw a correlation that the tumors appeared on average three [3] months after these so-called ‘vaccinations.’” In this clip from an interview with klaTVEnglish from 2024, Dr. Ute Krüger, a pathologist and breast cancer researcher in Sweden, describes her experience witnessing the exact same phenomenon Dr. Angus Dalgleish did in the previous tweet: explosive, aggressive cancers that appeared in cancer patients who were previously stable prior to receiving one or more COVID injections. Krüger describes how, following the rollout of the COVID injections, she began to see the largest tumors she had ever seen in her career. “And the tumors simply grew more aggressively, and there were more frequent occurrences, [meaning] relapses,” Krüger adds. The pathologist and breast cancer researcher notes: “Patients may have been tumor free for 20 years, and then a few months after these injections against corona, the tumor suddenly came back. And with such aggressiveness that the patients often died as a result.”
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(7/57) DR. JOHN CAMPBELL, describing the work of DR. DAVID SPEICHER—“The Moderna [injection] can contain up to 10 [trillion] copies of DNA fragments per dose.” In this clip from a video posted in October 2024, Dr. John Campbell, a semi-retired nurse lecturer, describes work performed by molecular virologist Dr. David Speicher, which found that in some of the COVID injection vials, there are 10 TRILLION copies of the DNA plasmids. Campbell notes that 3 to 10 copies is “enough to cause incorporation of SV40 DNA contamination into the nuclear genome of the cell, thereby causing a mutation, which has been identified in cell cultures in chromosomes 9 and 12, including an oncogene that can potentially cause cancer.”
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(8/57) DR. ANGUS DALGLEISH (PT. 2)—“The Pfizer [injections] are all full of SV40 [and] SV40 was what, in my day, we put into mice to make them grow tumors…” Here is Professor Angus Dalgleish once again, this time in a clip taken from a discussion with Charles Kovess et al. from December of 2024. Dalgleish notes the following: "It's obvious talking to everybody and all the presentations I've been to....[that] they're [the COVID injections] all completely contaminated. They're just not fit for purpose," Dalgleish says. "The Pfizer [injections] are all full of SV40 [and] SV40 was what, in my day, we put into mice to make them grow tumors so we could pour chemotherapy into them to see if it worked for the tumors. And we are putting this into humans for a disease that hasn't killed anybody for at least two years. It is beyond belief, and that's really what I cannot understand."
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(9/57) DR. SUCHARIT BHAKDI—“The integration of any foreign gene into your chromosome can cause cancer immediately.” Sucharit Bhakdi, a retired Professor Emeritus of Medical Microbiology and Immunology and former Chair of the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, describes in this clip taken from a conversation with Children’s Health Defense from May 2023 how the integration of foreign genes into a person’s genome can lead to cancer. Bhakdi notes that mRNA injections cause this type of damage because “the [DNA] plasmids, these foreign genes derived from bacteria, stolen from bacteria, enter the human cells, and…every cell that is genetically altered is doomed.”
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(10/57) KEVIN MCKERNAN (Pt. 2)—“This SV40 component…it interacts with P53 [which] is [the] guardian of the genome that’s supposed to keep our genome intact…[and] it’s the most cited gene in cancer.” In this clip from an interview Kevin McKernan did with Bret Weinstein, he notes that the SV40—which has been firmly established as being present in the DNA plasmid contamination in the COVID injections—interacts with P53, a gene that is commonly referred to as “the guardian of the genome.” “This SV40 component…it interacts with P53 [which] is [the] guardian of the genome that’s supposed to keep our genome intact,” McKernan says. “And now we have billions of these molecules being injected that we know interact with that.” Furthermore, McKernan adds that P53 is “the most cited gene in cancer,” and “if you mess with P53, you’re inviting cancer, particularly if you shut it down.” The scientist also notes that simply having fragmented DNA inside the cytosol of cells—that is, the liquid portion of the cytoplasm within a cell, where many biochemical reactions occur—is enough to cause cancer; meaning the DNA doesn’t even need to be imported into the nucleus of the cell. “It [the plasmids] doesn’t have to get into the nucleus to cause cancer. Just cytosolic presence of DNA like this can trigger this cGAS STING pathway,” McKernan notes. (The cGAS-STING pathway is an innate immune signaling route that detects cytosolic DNA to trigger an immune response, including inflammation and an antiviral defense.)
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(11/57) DR. JANCI LINDSAY— “LNPs have been found to cause cancer cells that are already present to more readily spread by inducing endothelial leakiness.” In this clip from a presentation given for the World Council for Health, posted in 2023, toxicologist and molecular biologist Dr. Janci Linsday describes the nine (or more) ways the mRNA COVID injections can cause cancer. In her presentation, Lindsay notes that: –the injections use lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), which have been found to cause cancer cells that are already present to spread more readily –the LNPs may be oncogenic by themselves –the SV40 is a “super promoter” that is “great at driving gene expression,” and should it sit above an oncogene, you could have “an amplification of a cancer gene.” –the spike protein can interact with, and suppress, P53, the aforementioned “guardian of the genome.” –the injections can produce “frame shifted” proteins, which are aberrant and can themselves cause cancer –the mRNA in the injections itself can reverse transcribe into the genome, in turn causing insertional mutagenesis and cancer –the injections cause immunosuppression of T cells, which, in turn, can damage the immune system and lead to cancer (as previously mentioned in the thread)
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(12/57) KEVIN MCKERNAN (Pt. 3)—“We have sequencing from a colon [tumor] biopsy from a patient who was four [4] times vaccinated…we can find [Pfizer-injection DNA] plasmids in there at a hundred copies per cell.” In this clip from a 2024 Mind & Matter podcast, we hear again from scientist Kevin McKernan, who describes finding the DNA plasmids from Pfizer’s mRNA COVID injection in a colon tumor from a—now deceased—individual who received four injections. ”We have sequencing from a colon biopsy from a patient who was four [4] times vaccinated. A year after vaccination, they had a colon cancer. They biopsied it that day, and then 30 days later, they died, and then they biopsied after, and we have sequencing on both the pre-mortem and post-mortem samples," McKernan says. The scientist and entrepreneur, often cited as the first person to find DNA contamination in the mRNA COVID injections, adds, "we can find plasmids in there a hundred copies per cell. They're not exactly the same as Pfizer's, which is a real head-scratcher, but they're in there." McKernan goes on to say: “The copy number alone suggests that these things aren't fully fragmented. Right? These plasmids really shouldn't be replicating to a hundred copies per cell." McKernan adds, "They shouldn't be in there at that level because if you just do the math on how much is in the vaccine, when you do an injection of this, this person has four vaccines...1.2 ml of Pfizer...went into about 87,000 mls [of] body volume. So you should have a massive dilution into your body. Yet when we're sequencing this and doing qPCR off the tumor, the CTs coming back off the tumor are almost as high as they are straight out of the vial."
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(13/57) RETIRED PHARMA R&D EXECUTIVE SASHA LATYPOVA— “The FDA was fully aware that these things would cause cancer because they’ve written numerous guidance documents [saying so]; that’s how they regulate industry.” In this clip from an interview with Dr. Drew from 2024, retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova describes how the "FDA was fully aware that these things [the COVID injections] would cause cancer, because they've written numerous guidance documents [saying so]; that's how they regulate industry.” Latypova notes that in “2015, 2013, even more recently than that, they wrote extensive guidance documents explaining to manufacturers who wanted to develop mRNA products that they need to study...cancer..." "They had this knowledge and they told manufacturers you have to study these risks and you have to exclude them and they were also not allowed to even study it in healthy volunteers because it was considered unethical," Latypova adds. "It was considered too dangerous. So then we come to 2020 [and] all of the sudden all of this is solved—this is a joke. To me, that's where I became extremely suspicious..." One such FDA guidance document referenced by Latypova is linked in tweet 39 of this mega-thread.
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(14/57) DR. JAMES ROYLE— “In addition to the increase in all-cause excess deaths in highly vaccinated countries since the gene based–injectable rollout, there has been observed an alarming and significant increase in cancers.” In this 2024 presentation for the Stone Summit, U.K.-based surgeon Dr. James Royle describes seeing the same kinds of phenomena regarding turbo cancers as described by Professor Angus Dalgleish, Dr. Ryan Cole, Dr. Ute Krüger, et al. He also notes that the excuses for these cancers that have been used to deflect away from the COVID injections as the cause don’t make any logical sense. “In addition to the increase in all-cause excess deaths in highly vaccinated countries since the gene-based injectable rollout, there has been observed an alarming and significant increase in cancers,” Royle says. “These cancers have been termed colloquially ‘turbo cancers.’ Obviously, this is not a scientific term, but reflects the different aggressive biological nature that seems to be being observed by the public as well as clinicians…There was [also] a clear, dramatic increase [in cancer rates] that occurred in 2021 shortly after the rollout.” Royle goes on to note the following: “A robust study recently published from Japan now [retracted] by the journal after significant pressure showed cancer-related excess mortality in vaccinated populations. Cancer is being observed within all ages. It is my assertion shared by many experts oncologists and clinical colleagues around the world that the cancers we are seeing are extremely aggressive and are of a different biology. One study showed this dramatic increase, particularly in younger ages through 2021, [and in] 2022, [a] 7.9% increase.” The surgeon adds: “I've noticed aggressive widespread recurrences in previously successfully treated bowel cancer cases that I'd considered cured. Many metastases in these cases are unusual or atypical. Middle aged and elderly people are presenting with out-of-the-blue aggressive stage IV colorectal cancer who are incurable and die within weeks or months. In many of these cases, the entire liver appears to be filled with large, round tumor masses.” The prominent surgeon notes that “many of [his] multidisciplinary team colleagues, fellow surgeons, oncologists, pathologists, radiologists and specialist nurses have all acknowledged… [a] sudden change in patterns and [a] dramatic increase in these aggressive incurable advanced cancers…observed in these past two years. However, none of them can offer an explanation.” “This post-2021 increase cannot be explained by a sudden population-wide change in environmental toxins,” Royle notes. “Ultra-processed foods are not new. We already had an obesity epidemic prior to COVID-19,” the surgeon adds. “In any case, there is no valid argument that the increase is due to stopping [cancer] screening given we are seeing a particular increase in cancers in much younger people, 20 to 45 years of age. Screening services for colorectal cancer and breast and others typically start at 60 years [of age].”
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(15/57) DR. WILLIAM MAKIS— “Once the vaccines roll out in 2021, you see a statistically significant rise in cancer, and it rises every single year since then…there’s some kind of damage that…can manifest years after you’ve had your last COVID vaccines.” In this clip from a discussion with pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas, oncologist, radiologist, and cancer researcher Dr. William Makis describes some of the work that’s been done by The Ethical Skeptic on cancer trends following the rollout of the COVID injections. Makis notes that there was a “statistically significant rise in cancer” in the U.S. following the rollout of the COVID injections. Furthermore, he says that the injections cause “some kind of damage that…can manifest years after you’ve had your last COVID vaccines.” "I love the work of Ethical Skeptic, and this is his work," Makis says of the graph he presents for Thomas. "This is a data analyst on X...and he looks at CDC data, and he finds these trends that are really fascinating." "These are deaths from malignant neoplasms in...a younger cohort, ages 0 to 54," Makis says. "And you see that really, in 2020, you don't see much in terms of a [rise in] cancer. There seems to be a slight blip above trend line, but it's sort of still hovering around a long-term trend line. And then once the vaccines roll out in 2021, then you see a statistically significant rise in cancer, and it rises every single year since then." Ethical Skeptic "calls it a 12-sigma event, which is...I'm not even gonna try to describe what that means, how astronomically unlikely this is to be a sort of a random thing or a coincidence," Makis says. "This is a very real trend. I'm seeing it in thousands and thousands of young people," the cancer researcher adds. "And what's shocking and what's particularly concerning about this graph—and I really want people to pay attention to this—is that people stopped taking booster shots. People have, by and large, stopped taking booster shots. But the trend continues. And it's a very steady upward trend. There's no sign of it leveling off or stopping, or reversing. And this has me really, really concerned for the long term." Makis goes on to say: "Initially, I started seeing these patterns...Someone would take a COVID vaccine and then they would be diagnosed with a stage 4 cancer out of the blue four months later, six months later. And I thought, 'Okay. Well, maybe there's a pattern here. Maybe there's a sort of a certain time that's required for cancer to develop.' And through my research, I found, for example, that there is a shift in the type of antibodies that we produce. It's called the IgG4 shift. And IgG4 antibodies start being produced once you've been exposed to multiple shots, once you've had at least two COVID vaccines. And these are called tolerance antibodies. This is where your...immune system starts tolerating the antigen, which is the spike protein; but it also starts tolerating cancer and cancer cells. And that takes a few months. That whole shift takes several months to happen. "But then I start[ed] seeing cases where the young person hasn't taken a shot in the last two years, then they're just suddenly diagnosed with an aggressive stage 4 cancer that behaves the way these mRNA vaccine–induced turbo cancers are behaving, and they [the patients] have a very, very poor prognosis. They don't respond to chemotherapy or radiation therapy or even immunotherapy, and then they die approximately six to 12 months after diagnosis. So there is a long-term effect, and that is the one thing that really has me concerned...that there is something that happens to people who've had the vaccines that is permanent. There's some kind of damage that appears to be permanent, and it can manifest years after you've had your last COVID vaccines. And this is really, really, concerning for me."
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(16/57) DR. CHARLES HOFFE—“In my practice now…approximately two-thirds of all cancer diagnoses—since the vax rollout—are stage 4.” Topping off the first section of this turbo cancer mega-thread, which features expert testimonials from around the Western world, we have a clip of family physician Dr. Charles Hoffe speaking on turbo cancers during a 2022 Children’s Health Defense virtual roundtable. Hoffe, who has more than 30 years of experience as a family physician, notes that “as a family doctor, over the years, a small percentage of the new cancer diagnoses would unfortunately be stage 4 at first diagnosis. But in [his] practice now…approximately two-thirds of all cancer diagnoses since the vax rollout are stage 4.” Hoffe notes, “pathologists around the world have noticed this—that, unfortunately, now people who had previous cancers, which were in remission, are flaring up since their shots because of the damage to their immune system by the COVID shots. [And with] new cancers being diagnosed, the tumors are bigger than ever. They seem to grow very aggressively, spread very aggressively, and be very resistant to treatment. So this has been nicknamed turbo cancer.” The veteran family physician goes on to describe one such case of turbo cancer he’s seen in a man who was mandated to get a COVID injection in order to keep his job. Hoffe shows how the man, a 61-year-old machine operator, developed a grapefruit-sized tumor in his lungs within months of getting his COVID injection. He also developed other tumors, including ones that grew along the vertebrae of his spine. Hoffe notes that the prognosis at the time was that the man would almost certainly die due to the aggressive cancers.
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(17/57) DR. MICHAEL HUANG—“The clinic I work at, it's about 30 physicians…in the past year, I've learned that two out of the 30 physicians I work with were diagnosed with aggressive advanced cancer, and one of them died because of that.” Starting off our testimonies portion of this turbo-cancer mega-thread, we have Dr. Michael Huang, a family medicine physician in California, describing during a 2024 conversation with Charles Kovess, et al. how he started to see aggressive cancers crop up in his colleagues following the rollout of the COVID injections. Huang tells Kovess, et al.: “I have seen what has happened when my friends have taken the shots. I used to work at Kaiser. It's a large management group. And the clinic I work at, it's about 30 physicians. And, you know, physicians, we are usually trying to stay healthy, trying to avoid harms. We don't smoke. We don't drink. And, unfortunately, in the past year, I've learned that two out of the 30 physicians I work with were diagnosed with aggressive advanced cancer, and one of them died because of that. Almost monthly, I will hear about one or two physicians [who] die suddenly. And most recently, we know this family practice resident who's in his thirties. We have seen him about a month ago, healthy, vibrant, and he suddenly died of advanced gastric cancer and left an unborn child as a result. So we start to see the results of healthcare providers playing Russian Roulette, getting the shots as they're…leading their patients, setting examples, getting their booster shots and getting injured from these experimental vaccines.”
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(18/57) NURSE DAWN—“This is a huge tumor about the size of a softball behind my eye. And I had [metastases] to the back of my skull and 12 different areas of my bones.” In this clip taken from a 2023 interview with Children’s Health Defense, Dawn, a nurse, describes how she developed cancers throughout her body after receiving two Moderna COVID injections. Dawn describes how the cancer is “muscle-loving,” appearing throughout her body, and did not respond to treatment. Dawn also shows how she developed a “huge tumor about the size of a softball” behind her eye” and had “[metastases] to the back of [her] skull and 12 different areas of [her] bones.”
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(19/57) MODERNA COVID INJECTION–TRIAL PARTICIPANT—“I know I got this vaccine that's caused me to have a rare cancer that has progressed way faster than it was supposed to.” In this clip from a HighWire segment, we hear from a participant of Moderna’s COVID-injection “clinical trial” describe how she developed T-cell lymphoma—a type of cancer that originates from T cells, a type of white blood cell in the immune system—following receipt of her injection. Since being diagnosed, the trial participant notes that she’s been to the doctor approximately 200 times and has had four surgeries. Despite the doctors’ visits and surgeries, however, the participant notes her cancer has only become “worse.”
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(20/57) JILL KLEISS— “Shortly after I had my vaccine, two weeks later, I went to have my routine mammogram…[months later] I insisted on a biopsy…[and was told I] have the same breast cancer again [that I had prior to the ‘vaccine’] on the other side.” In this clip we hear from Jill Kleiss, also known as the Chemo Dancer on YouTube, who describes how she developed breast cancer following her COVID injection. Kleiss, who had had breast cancer prior to receiving the injection, developed cancer in the breast that had previously been healthy and cancer-free.
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(21/57) CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE BUS STORY—“[After receiving his COVID injection], all of the sudden he had multiple cancers, fluid buildup around the heart, [and] pneumonia.” In this clip from a Children’s Health Defense bus story, we hear from a gentleman who describes a cousin of his who developed brain and lung cancer following receipt of his COVID injection. The gentleman notes that his cousin subsequently died—the time between the development of the cancers and death was less than a year.
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(22/57) CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE BUS STORY—”I…have three aunts that had turbo cancer from the COVID shot. They all died last year. Within months of each other.” A woman describes for Children’s Health Defense how three of her aunts all developed turbo cancer following their receipt of one or more COVID injections. She notes they all died within months of each other.
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(23/57) JEREMIAH’S AUNT, NANCY ARCHER—“I think [it] took, from her last shot, approximately, 12 months to get to that point where medicine didn’t even think they had an answer [for her cancer].” In this Children’s Health Defense bus interview, we hear from Jeremiah, who describes how his aunt, Nancy Archer, died of turbo cancer following receipt of a Pfizer COVID injection. “It was heartbreaking to watch her succumb to turbo cancer from the effects of the shot,” Jeremiah says. He notes that she only took the injection because she wanted to ensure that she could travel freely between her homes in the U.S. and Guatemala. The timespan between Nancy’s receipt of her final Pfizer injection and her turbo cancer–caused death was approximately one year according to Jeremiah.
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(24/57) 2024 Study Published in Cureus Shows Significant Cancer Increase in Japan Following the Rollout of the COVID Injections in the Country Title: Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan Authors: Miki Gibo, et al. Published: April 8, 2024 Journal: Cureus Key excerpts: “No significant excess mortality was observed during the first year of the pandemic (2020). However, some excess cancer mortalities were observed in 2021 after mass vaccination with the first and second vaccine doses, and significant excess mortalities were observed for all cancers and some specific types of cancer (including ovarian cancer, leukemia, prostate cancer, lip/oral/pharyngeal cancer, pancreatic cancer, and breast cancer) after mass vaccination with the third dose in 2022.” “In 2020, the first year of the pandemic, there was significant deficit mortality for all causes (< 99% lower PI) and no excess mortality for all cancers. However, in 2021, there was significant excess mortality of 2.1% (>99% upper PI) for all causes and 1.1% (>95% upper PI) for all cancers. In 2022, the excesses increased to 9.6% (>99% upper PI) for all causes and 2.1% (>99% upper PI) for all cancers. In 2022, the number of excess deaths was 115,799 (95%CI: 106,018, 125,501) for all causes and 7,162 (95%CI: 4,786, 9,522) for all cancers.” Link: https://www.proquest.com/openview/4513714a8a02ac4e05aed1faa662214c/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2045583
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(25/57) “Five case reports of 71, 40, 76, 55, and 75 years old with diagnoses of colon cancer, breast cancer, skin cancer, and gastric cancer in the last two patients respectively days and months after receiving the second, third and fourth doses of the COVID-19 vaccine.” Title: Which Could Be the Risk Factors for Developing Cancer After Receiving The COVID-19 Vaccine? Authors: Huang, W. L Published: January 28, 2023 Journal: International Journal of Cancer Research & Therapy Key Excerpts: “There are several articles in the literature after the COVID-19 pandemic showing the necessity of vaccinating people who have a cancer diagnosis to prevent this disease in this group of patients. But what I want to report in this article is that I am facing an increasing number of cases of patients with cancer after receiving COVID-19 vaccines and this is what I want to describe in this study, using the thoughts of Hippocrates (460 bce - 375 bce), the father of medicine, that said that ‘it is more important to consider other ancient medical traditions prior to the knowledge we have nowadays.’” “Five case reports of 71, 40, 76, 55, and 75 years old with diagnoses of colon cancer, breast cancer, skin cancer, and gastric cancer in the last two patients respectively days and months after receiving the second, third and fourth doses of the COVID-19 vaccine.” “The conclusion of this study is that patients that are developing cancer after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine have in common, energy deficiency inside the five internal massive organs (and these alterations are the factors to induce cancer formation according to traditional Chinese medicine) and the use of this kind of vaccine has the potential to reduce even more the vital energy of the patient which is already very low and leading to a weakness state of the immune system and increasing the chance to have any kind of chronic diseases, in this case, cancer.” Link: https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/which-could-be-the-risk-factors-for-developing-cancer-after-receiving-the-covid19-vaccine.pdf
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(26/57) “We report on an aggressive, infiltrating, metastatic, and ultimately lethal basaloid type of carcinoma arising shortly after an mRNA vaccination for COVID-19…We propose that the vaccine can cause suppression of the immune system, which leads to accelerated cancer progression.” Title: Bell’s palsy or an aggressive infiltrating basaloid carcinoma post-mRNA vaccination for COVID-19? A case report and review of the literature Authors: Anthony M Kyriakopoulos, et al. Published: September 15, 2023 Journal: Journal of Experimental and Clinical Sciences Key Excerpts: “We report on an aggressive, infiltrating, metastatic, and ultimately lethal basaloid type of carcinoma arising shortly after an mRNA vaccination for COVID-19…We propose that the vaccine can cause suppression of the immune system, which leads to accelerated cancer progression.” “In this study we describe all aspects of this case and discuss possible causal links between the rapid emergence of this metastatic cancer and mRNA vaccination. We place this within the context of multiple immune impairments potentially related to the mRNA injections that would be expected to potentiate more aggressive presentation and progression of cancer. The type of malignancy we describe suggests a population risk for occurrence of a large variety of relatively common basaloid phenotype cancer cells, which may have the potential for metastatic disease.” Link: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10620857/
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(27/57) “Evidence is provided that adding 100 % of N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ) to the mRNA vaccine in a melanoma model stimulated cancer growth and metastasis…Based on this compelling evidence, we suggest that future clinical trials for cancers or infectious diseases should not use mRNA vaccines with a 100 % m1Ψ modification, but rather ones with the lower percentage of m1Ψ modification to avoid immune suppression.” Title: Review: N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ): Friend or foe of cancer? Authors: Alberto Rubio-Casillas, et al. Published: May 2024 Journal: International Journal of Biological Macromolecules Key Excerpts: “Evidence is provided that adding 100 % of N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ) to the mRNA vaccine in a melanoma model stimulated cancer growth and metastasis…Based on this compelling evidence, we suggest that future clinical trials for cancers or infectious diseases should not use mRNA vaccines with a 100 % m1Ψ modification, but rather ones with the lower percentage of m1Ψ modification to avoid immune suppression.” Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0141813024022323
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(28/57) “Treg responses produced after mRNA vaccination and the subsequent mRNA-encoded SARS-CoV-2 spike protein expression may lead to a harmful influence on the immune system of vaccinees, and subsequent accelerated development of cancer and autoimmune disease.” Title: Oncogenesis and autoimmunity as a result of mRNA COVID-19 vaccination Authors: Anthony M Kyriakopoulos, et al. Published: April 23, 2024 Journal: TechRxiv PREPRINT Key Excerpts: “In summary, the Treg responses produced after mRNA vaccination and the subsequent mRNA-encoded SARS-CoV-2 spike protein expression may lead to a harmful influence on the immune system of vaccinees, and subsequent accelerated development of cancer and autoimmune disease. These mechanisms are consistent with both epidemiological findings and case reports.” Link: https://www.techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.22541/au.171387387.73158754
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(29/57) “In this report, a rare case of primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma (PCACC) localized in the subcutaneous tissue of the scapular region that grew after BNT162b2 corona virus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination…The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine has been associated with a multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-V). A comparable immune reaction could potentially enhance tumor growth rate.” Title: Primary Cutaneous Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma in a Rare Location With an Immune Response to a BNT162b2 Vaccine Authors: Yilmaz, Abdurrahman, et al. Published: April–June 2024 Journal: JBJS Case Connector Key Excerpts: “In this report, a rare case of primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma (PCACC) localized in the subcutaneous tissue of the scapular region that grew after BNT162b2 corona virus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination is presented and may be explained by CD4 and CD8 cell infiltration. The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine has been associated with a multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-V). A comparable immune reaction could potentially enhance tumor growth rate.” Link: https://journals.lww.com/jbjscc/abstract/2024/06000/primary_cutaneous_adenoid_cystic_carcinoma_in_a.7.aspx
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(30/57) “mRNA vaccine boosters may impair immune system response in immune compromised individuals. Multiple doses of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines may result in much higher levels of IgG 4 antibodies, or also impaired activation of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells.” Title: mRNA vaccine boosters and impaired immune system response in immune compromised individuals: a narrative review Authors: Alberto Boretti Published: January 27, 2024 Journal: Clinical and Experimental Medicine Key Excerpts: “mRNA vaccine boosters may impair immune system response in immune compromised individuals. Multiple doses of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines may result in much higher levels of IgG 4 antibodies, or also impaired activation of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells.” Link: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10238-023-01264-1
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(31/57) “The mRNA vaccines potentially cause increased risk to infectious diseases and cancer.” Title: Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs Authors: Stephanie Seneff, et al. Published: June 2022 Journal: Food and Chemical Toxicology Key Excerpts: “The mRNA vaccines potentially cause increased risk to infectious diseases and cancer.” “In this paper, we present evidence that vaccination induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health. Immune cells that have taken up the vaccine nanoparticles release into circulation large numbers of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites. We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance.” “These vaccinations have now been shown to downregulate critical pathways related to cancer surveillance, infection control, and cellular homeostasis.” Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027869152200206X
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(32/57) “In this report we describe the case of a healthy, young, athletic woman who developed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL)/lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) after receiving the second dose of the Pfizer/BioNTech modified mRNA (modRNA) COVID-19 genetic vaccine (marketed as Comirnaty)” Title: A Case Report of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL)/Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (LBL) Following the Second Dose of Comirnaty: An Analysis of the Potential Pathogenic Mechanism Based on of the Existing Literature Authors: Patrizia Gentilini, et al. Published: Posted April 1, 2024 Journal: PREPRINT Key Excerpts: “In this report we describe the case of a healthy, young, athletic woman who developed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL)/lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) after receiving the second dose of the Pfizer/BioNTech modified mRNA (modRNA) COVID-19 genetic vaccine (marketed as Comirnaty)” “A time interval of 16 weeks from the second vaccination to the diagnosis of cancer was noted.” Link: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Panagis-Polykretis/publication/379538444_A_Case_Report_of_Acute_Lymphoblastic_Leukaemia_ALLLymphoblastic_Lymphoma_LBL_Following_the_Second_Dose_of_ComirnatyR_An_Analysis_of_the_Potential_Pathogenic_Mechanism_Based_on_of_the_Existing_Literatu/links/6615050439e7641c0ba6c7f8/A-Case-Report-of-Acute-Lymphoblastic-Leukaemia-ALL-Lymphoblastic-Lymphoma-LBL-Following-the-Second-Dose-of-ComirnatyR-An-Analysis-of-the-Potential-Pathogenic-Mechanism-Based-on-of-the-Existing-Literat.pdf
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(33/57) “We report a case of neuropsychiatric symptoms and refractory HLH in a woman with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) after receiving her COVID-19 vaccine treated with belimumab, later found to have intravascular large B-cell lymphoma (IVLBCL) at autopsy.” Title: Fatal hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis with intravascular large B-cell lymphoma following coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus: an intertwined case Authors: Yusuke Ueda, et al. Published: November 6, 2023 Journal: Immunological Medicine Key Excerpts: “We report a case of neuropsychiatric symptoms and refractory HLH in a woman with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) after receiving her COVID-19 vaccine treated with belimumab, later found to have intravascular large B-cell lymphoma (IVLBCL) at autopsy.” Link: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/25785826.2024.2338594
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(34/57) “After reviewing the available literature, we are particularly concerned that certain COVID-19 vaccines may generate a pro-tumorigenic milieu (i.e., a specific environment that could lead to neoplastic transformation) that predisposes some (stable) oncologic patients and survivors to cancer progression, recurrence, and/or metastasis.” Title: SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and the Multi-Hit Hypothesis of Oncogenesis Authors: Raquel Valdes Angues, et al. Published: December 17, 2023 Journal: Cureus Key Excerpts: “After reviewing the available literature, we are particularly concerned that certain COVID-19 vaccines may generate a pro-tumorigenic milieu (i.e., a specific environment that could lead to neoplastic transformation) that predisposes some (stable) oncologic patients and survivors to cancer progression, recurrence, and/or metastasis.” Link: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10792266/
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(35/57) “We present a rare case of metastatic prostate cancer diagnosed after initially presenting as generalized lymphadenopathy following a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID) booster vaccination.” Title: Metastatic prostatic adenocarcinoma presenting as generalized lymphadenopathy unmasked by a COVID booster vaccine Authors: Kavya Bharathidasan, et al. Published: November 28, 2023 Journal: Clinical Case Reports Key Excerpts: “We present a rare case of metastatic prostate cancer diagnosed after initially presenting as generalized lymphadenopathy following a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID) booster vaccination.” Link: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ccr3.8278
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(36/57) “Our results raise grave concerns regarding the safety of the BNT162b2 vaccine and call for an immediate halt of all RNA biologicals unless these concerns can be dispelled.” Title: BioNTech RNA-Based COVID-19 Injections Contain Large Amounts Of Residual DNA Including An SV40 Promoter/Enhancer Sequence Authors: Ulrike Kämmerer, et al. Published: December 3, 2024 Journal: Science, Public Health Policy and the Law Key Excerpts: “We further analyzed RNA and DNA contents of these vials and identified large amounts of DNA after RNase A digestion in all lots with concentrations ranging from 32.7 ng to 43.4 ng per clinical dose. This far exceeds the maximal acceptable concentration of 10 ng per clinical dose that has been set by international regulatory authorities.” “Our results raise grave concerns regarding the safety of the BNT162b2 vaccine and call for an immediate halt of all RNA biologicals unless these concerns can be dispelled.” Link: https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/biontech-rna-based-covid-19-injections-contain-large-amounts-of-residual-dna-including-an-sv40-promoter-enhancer-sequence/
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(37/57) “These data demonstrate the presence of billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in these vaccines. Using fluorometry, all vaccines exceed the guidelines for residual DNA set by FDA and WHO of 10 ng/dose by 188 – 509-fold.” Title: DNA fragments detected in monovalent and bivalent 2 Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada: Exploratory dose response relationship with serious adverse events Authors: David J. Speicher, et al. Journal: PREPRINT Key Excerpts: “These data demonstrate the presence of billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in these vaccines. Using fluorometry, all vaccines exceed the guidelines for residual DNA set by FDA and WHO of 10 ng/dose by 188 – 509-fold…Our findings extend existing concerns about vaccine safety and call into question the relevance of guidelines conceived before the introduction of efficient transfection using LNPs.” Link: https://osf.io/preprints/osf/mjc97
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(38/57) “We conclude that the SV40 origin of replication and early control region are sufficient viral components for the genomic instability at sites of SV40 integration and that SV40 T Ag is not required.” Title: The genomic instability associated with integrated simian virus 40 DNA is dependent on the origin of replication and early control region Authors: D J Hunter, et al. Published: February 1, 1994 Journal: Journal of Virology Key Excerpts: “We conclude that the SV40 origin of replication and early control region are sufficient viral components for the genomic instability at sites of SV40 integration and that SV40 T Ag is not required.” Link: https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jvi.68.2.787-796.1994?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(39/57) “Residual DNA might be a risk to your final product because of oncogenic and/or infectivity potential. There are several potential mechanisms by which residual DNA could be oncogenic, including the integration and expression of encoded oncogenes or insertional mutagenesis following DNA integration.” Title: Guidance for Industry Characterization and Qualification of Cell Substrates and Other Biological Materials Used in the Production of Viral Vaccines for Infectious Disease Indications Authors: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Key Excerpts: “Residual DNA might be a risk to your final product because of oncogenic and/or infectivity potential. There are several potential mechanisms by which residual DNA could be oncogenic, including the integration and expression of encoded oncogenes or insertional mutagenesis following DNA integration.” Link: https://www.fda.gov/media/78428/download
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(40/57) SENIOR RESEARCH SCIENTIST STEPHANIE SENEFF—"Ninety-eight percent [98%] of the mentions of cancer [in VAERS in 2021] were COVID vaccines...This is just very striking to me that cancer is something that these vaccines cause that other vaccines don't cause..." To start the VAERS portion of this turbo-cancer mega thread, we have senior research scientist at MIT Stephanie Seneff describing for Dr. William Makis, Zen Honeycutt, et al. how the COVID injections are heavily associated with various cancers according to numerous reports in VAERS. "Ninety-eight percent [98%] of the mentions of cancer [in VAERS in 2021] were COVID vaccines," Seneff says. "It's hugely more highly represented than the number of COVID vaccines that were received in that year, so it's way out of line with the other [non-COVID] vaccines." "This is just very striking to me that cancer is something that these vaccines cause that other vaccines don't cause," Seneff adds. She notes that for VAERS reports of cancer regarding flu jabs, there are "practically none," which means the ratio of how often the COVID injections cause cancer versus flu jabs is "infinity." As for mechanism of action, Seneff highlights one paper describing PD-L1 overexpression as a result of the COVID injections, which, in turn, can increase one's odds of developing cancer. (PD-L1, Seneff notes, is a "molecule that's produced by both cancer cells and immune cells" that "prevents... immune cells from responding to both the... COVID virus, but also to cancer.") Seneff notes that the paper shows a "dramatic difference" in overexpression of PD-L1 in the control group versus the group recently injected with the COVID jabs, with the latter group showing far more of it.
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(41/57) VAERS ID 1220913: “HUSBAND DIED BECAUSE OF TERMINAL PANCREATIC CANCER.” (One dose of Moderna’s COVID injection.) https://t.co/e0iryfdfLg
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(42/57) VAERS ID 2184304: “HE HAD 2 LUMBAR SPINE X-RAYS ON OR ABOUT JULY 16, 2021, WHICH SHOWED LESIONS ON HIS SPINE…FROM THAT POINT ON I WATCHED THE TUMORS APPEAR ON HIS BODY AND HEAD. HE DIED 9/7/2021.” (Two doses of Moderna’s COVID injection.) https://t.co/t0ZBbVpa7k
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(43/57) VAERS ID 2785362: “TURBO CANCER RAPIDLY SPREAD THROUGHOUT HER BODY, EVENTUALLY WINDING UP IN HER SPINE AND BRAIN…TAKING HER LIFE.” (Three doses of Moderna’s COVID injection.) https://t.co/haWd0l5sfX
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(44/57) VAERS ID 1037833: “SHE [WAS] INFORMED THAT 3 DAYS AFTER THE SHOT, SHE HAD [A] CT WITH CONTRAST FOR STAGE 1 LUNG CANCER.” (One Pfizer COVID injection.) https://t.co/33rfHuGu3O
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(45/57) VAERS ID 1248298: “PATIENT PRESENTS TO EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ONE DAY AFTER VACCINATION…FOUND TO HAVE WIDELY METASTATIC...CANCER INVOLVING CHEST, ABDOMEN, AND PELVIS.” (Two Moderna COVID injections.) https://t.co/uOZEvqujz3
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(46/57) VAERS ID 1290185: “PATIENT STATES THAT WITHIN 2 WEEKS OF THE FIRST VACCINE SHE NOTICED BREAST SWELLING, NIPPLE INVERSION AND TENDER AXILA OF THE RIGHT BREAST…[SHE NOW HAS] INVASIVE BREAST CARCINOMA.” https://t.co/zPtBA8zDXq
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(47/57) SYMPTOMS TEXT SEARCH: CARCINOMA; TOTAL NUMBER OF REPORTS: 923 Note that in the context of the COVID injections, searching a single cancer-related term like “carcinoma” turns up more than 900 reports. Also note that VAERS reports are only a small fraction of the true number of adverse-event cases. According to one study performed by Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc. in 2011, it is estimated that VAERS is underreported by a factor of 100 or more. Source: https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(48/57) “I HAVE A FAMILY MEMBER WHO WAS IMMUNO-COMPROMISED, FORCED TO TAKE [THE] VACCINE TO KEEP [THEIR] JOB, [AND] NOW HAS TURBO CANCER & [IS] FIGHTING FOR [THEIR] LIFE.” https://t.co/Q8Qzyg4DFa
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(49/57) “MY EX TOOK IT...HE DIED 9 MONTHS LATER WITH TURBO CANCER.” https://t.co/TVMaGjcENk
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(50/57) “MY WIFE HAD HER BREAST CANCER IN CHECK BUT WAS MANDATED TO TAKE THE COVID SHOT [WHEN] SHE WAS A SCHOOL TEACHER. TURBO CANCER AND GONE IN 5 WEEKS.” https://t.co/EN9DlNUn51
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(51/57) “I LOST MY BELOVED MOTHER TO METASTATIC CANCER (SARCOMA KIDNEYS AND LUNGS) IN AUG [20]23. SHE DECLINED AFTER HER 5TH VACCINE (MODERNA) IN SEPT [20]22.” https://t.co/U2j0M8H6ja
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(52/57) “MY MUM WAS A HEALTHY, INDEPENDENT, OUT-EVERYDAY WOMAN UNTIL SHE GOT THE SHOT. 2 DAYS LATER SHE HAD BLEEDING BEHIND HER EYES, A FEW MONTHS AFTER THAT, DIAGNOSED WITH LUNG AND BRAIN CANCER…3 DAYS AFTER DIAGNOSIS PASSED AWAY.” https://t.co/8DtdEnuuoX
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(53/57) “I’VE LOST 5 OF MY FRIENDS (45-55 ALL VAXXED) ALL HAD WHAT I’D DESCRIBE AS TURBO CANCERS THAT SPREAD TOO QUICKLY FOR TREATMENT IN SOME CASES.” https://t.co/akzGIRHMJI
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(54/57) “MY [MOTHER IN LAW] WAS DIAGNOSED WITH BRAIN CANCER THIS PAST APRIL, THEY DID OPERATE, BUT 8 [WEEKS] LATER, SHE DIED. SHE WAS [VACCINATED] AT LEAST TWICE THAT WE KNOW OF.” https://t.co/tBT856ql5Z
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(55/57) “I HAVE A 47 YEAR OLD FRIEND WHO DIED THIS WEEK. TURBO CANCER. VAX AND BOOSTED. BRAIN TUMORS AND STAGE 4 COLON CANCER IN A MATTER OF MONTHS. DIED A YEAR LATER.” https://t.co/BLWLdls5oy
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(56/57) “MY DAD PASSED AWAY IN MAY FROM TURBO CANCER! HE WAS DIAGNOSED IN SEPTEMBER OF 2023, 8 MONTHS LATER HE DIED. HE WAS EXTREMELY HEALTHY, AND IN EXCELLENT SHAPE. HE TOOK 2 SHOTS WITHOUT MY KNOWLEDGE…” https://t.co/0kJ587txVP
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(57/57) “LOST MY FRIEND IN FEBRUARY TO A TURBO CANCER. SHE WENT FROM NO CANCER TO BONE CANCER AND STOMACH CANCER TO DEAD IN SEVERAL MONTHS. HER FAMILY PRESSURED HER TO TAKE THE SHOTS.” https://t.co/cQ66egypct
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(ADDENDUM TWEET 1) “You know, if you just read the pamphlet that comes with the COVID-19 vaccines, it says COMIRNATY has not been evaluated for…carcinogenicity…[Meaning] It hasn't been tested to see if it causes cancer.” In this clip, EMT and whistleblower Harry Fisher shows us the package insert that comes with the COMIRNATY injection (i.e. Pfizer’s ostensibly FDA approved COVID injection). He notes that the insert says that the injection has not been tested for potential carcinogenicity. Fisher notes that this means that “it hasn’t been tested to see if it causes cancer.” “They're constantly telling us it [the COVID injection] can't cause cancer, and they haven't even studied to see if it can,” Fisher adds. “They write it right there in the pamphlet.”
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(ADDENDUM TWEET 2) PLEASE ADD YOUR OWN PERSONAL TURBO-CANCER STORY TO THIS THREAD. For me: My first cousin once removed died of turbo cancer at the age of 40 and left behind one young son. Also: my uncle was diagnosed with skin cancer following his injection; my former barber was diagnosed with prostate cancer following his injection; my best friend’s father was diagnosed with colon cancer following his injection.
@Helios_Movement - George Ferman
If you want more energy, better gut health, skin health, improved libido and so on, you must make sure that you avoid the following dietary mistakes. Thread🧵
@Helios_Movement - George Ferman
*Standard disclaimer that nothing in this thread should be used as a substitute for medical advice* For starters, in case you are skeptical about just how much our diet matters, consider that tens of thousands (if not more) of DNA-related processes are based on nutrients. So, when we deprive ourselves of nutrients (either by not providing enough of them OR by messing up their absorption), TENS OF THOUSANDS of DNA-related processes become dysfunctional. That being said, now let's just right into common dietary mistakes (these might be numbered, but in the long run, all of these are equally important in my opinion).
@Helios_Movement - George Ferman
Mistake number 1: Consuming highly processed foods on a regular basis. Am i saying that you shouldn't never consumed a highly processed food? No. Now of course, since you are part of this niche space you are already avoiding highly processed foods for the most part, but keep in mind that most people are not and the problems with highly processed foods are many. From the fact that if you look at the ingredient lists they are not even foods but poison bombs in reality that could be hiding and are certainly contributing to health issues through ingredients such as MSG, high fructose corn syrup, food dyes, canola oil and other additives all the way to the fact that billions of dollars are spent every year for the sole purpose of figuring out how to make them as addictive as possible.
@Helios_Movement - George Ferman
Mistake number 2: Not realizing that when it comes to food, you can cover A LOT of your nutritional needs with just: -300 grams of quality shrimp/octopus or squid -10 whole eggs -200 grams of beef or lamb heart -200 grams of raw cheese -2 pounds of strawberries, oranges, kiwis, berries or something seasonal -100 grams of beef liver -Adding EVOO, potatoes, mushrooms and easy to digest vegetables in just one of your daily meals -4 pounds of bone in red meat per week Are these the cheapest foods? No. Are they cheaper than you might expect if they are sourced properly and most people still do now know that this list literally covers A LOT of their nutritional needs? Yes. P.S: If you have the space realize that growing a garden turns out to be easier than we think.
@Helios_Movement - George Ferman
Mistake number 3: Turning temporary extremes into permanent lifestyles. *This one is about veganism, going carnivore, never eating plants, eating 50 grams of fiber with each meal, low carb, high carb, low fat or whatever, for extended periods of time (months/years). Sometimes, you have to break something down to common sense. For example: The people with the worst health issues are the ones who follow dietary trends. One day they are keto, then vegan, three months later they go carnivore, then they go high carb and so on. BUT, the fundamental principles of nutrition, DO NOT, change every single month. All of us suggest eating whole, tasty and nutrient dense foods and implementing more dietary restrictions based on a specific context if needed. Anyone who does not do this has a borderline or actual eating disorder. *I'm not a dck and actually sympathize with people who suffer from it. What i do have a problem with though is being in denial about it and trying to impose this illness upon others by pretending that it's about being "healthy" and trying to obsessively impose this on others. An one dimensional boring diet, usually is an unhealthy diet.
@Helios_Movement - George Ferman
Point being that a fair amount of people try to follow diets that are so restrictive, that they end up being unhealthy. In general, if there's not enough variety in someone's diet, the person will not be covering his primary micronutrient needs. Obviously, in the beginning, these hyper restrictive diets can seem great and someone can experience lots of benefits by implementing them, mainly because he cuts out processed foods and eats some real food. But as many find out, do this for long enough and you inevitably experience a lot of health issues. If you have a specific health issue for example, let's say a gut issue, dietary restrictions need to of course be implemented. But remember that they are a tool, they are not the cure. If someone for example has gut dysbiosis, takes out some of the healthy things that happen to trigger some of his symptoms (let's say fruit for example) and does not work on fixing the causes of that dysbiosis, he will begin to react badly to more and more foods as it's also often noticed. Note: In order to understand just how perfectly balanced nature is through the variety of foods that it provides us, grapes are in season and raisins will start getting produced. A common complaint that a lot of people have in the winter, is low levels of vitamin D. Yet boron greatly extends that half life of vitamin D and guess what's high in boron? Raisins. Then another fruit we have access to during the winter are pomegranates which ALSO influence vitamin D. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7566096/ Then another food whose consumption is supposed to be increased a lot during the winter months is cheese which can contain up to 30IUs of vitamin D. You get the idea.
@Helios_Movement - George Ferman
If these did not convince you, also keep in mind that all nutrients work synergistically. For example: -Selenium, sulfur, iodine, CoQ10, manganese, vitamin E, B2, iron -Thiamine, manganese and magnesium. -B6 and B2. -Zinc and copper. -Retinol, DHA, E and B2. -Vitamin K and retinol. -Potassium and sodium. -Choline and B9. -B5 and K. -Iron, B2, B12, B9 copper, D, retinol and C. -Vitamin D, magnesium and retinol. Etc
@Helios_Movement - George Ferman
Mistake number 4: Over-relying on supplements. Supplements can be useful, but a lot of people rely too much on them. Here's why this is a problem: -The supplement industry is not that well regulated with even large amounts of heavy metals being inside a lot of supplements such as protein powders. -The types of vitamins and minerals that are used in most aren't that great (think magnesium oxide, zinc oxide, pyridoxine etc) -They treat certain vitamins such as one thing and not for the complexes that they are (think vitamin C and E for example). -Due to white labeling and so on, the fillers are more than ever. -A lot of the big brands have contaminants. -Most people are totally unaware that the subspecies in probiotics play a HUGE role for example and end up buying probiotics that do not even work (this is not a joke, most probiotic supplements are flat out scams). Take bifidolongum for example, most people think that it's one thing and do not know the existence or differences between 1714 and SD-BB536-JP for example. -They lack transport proteins.
@Helios_Movement - George Ferman
Mistake number 5: Consuming way too much food. You can approach this from multiple angles but let's take a neglected one which is that we should never forget that fat cells play a key role in regulating hormones which is one of the reasons why so many problems are created both when someone is (very lean or) overweight. Read this for more:
@Helios_Movement - George Ferman
Are you seeing the word leptin being thrown around but have no idea what it is? Give me 2 minutes and i will provide you with some easily digestible and useful information about leptin 👇 Leptin is a hormone like peptide that primarily acts on the hypothalamus, brainstem, and since it's mainly produce in the adipose tissues, it's also referred to as an adipokine. It supports fertility through LH and FSH, helps us with satiety, the delivery of macronutrients in the case of gastric leptin, lipid homeostasis, glucose homeostasis, hematopoiesis, it stimulates POMC, supports bone health, eNOS activation, it's crucial for the immune system and way more. Other examples of adipokines include stuff such as the probably known, IL-6, retinol binding protein 4, MCP-1, adiponectin and apelin. Leptin is also produced in the gastric mucosa and besides the adipose tissue, the leptin receptor is also expressed in the heart, CNS, skeletal muscle, lung, small intestine and the liver. So for the most part: leptin is released from the white adipose tissue, it then goes into the bloodstream and ends up in parts such as the hypothalamus (which means that leptin crosses the blood–brain barrier). So, stick to things such as red meat as your iron sources. As you're probably able to tell, leptin is very important and the question now is how we can make sure that we are leptin sensitive instead of being leptin resistant (aka our brains do not properly respond to leptin since chronically elevated levels led to the desensitization of the hypothalamic leptin receptors) in order to avoid nasty health effects? First of all, regarding testing, the lower limits for both men and women are 0.5ng/mL. The upper limit for women is 15-ish and for men 12-ish (again, ng/mL).
@Helios_Movement - George Ferman
Mistake number 6: Not balancing the amino acid profile of one's diet. A diet with an unbalanced amino acid profile could result in premature skin aging, fatigue, gut issues, cardiovascular issues, liver issues and anxiety. Yes, this topic is that important and the easiest things you can do in order to balance out the amino acid profile of your diet include: -Prioritizing bone in meats over fillets -Eating some stews/broths every week -Avoiding glyphosate -Consuming some grass fed beef gelatine or a glycine supplement -Eating a variety of animal products (eggs, seafood, beef, lamb, dairy) instead of only eating chicken breast for example
@Helios_Movement - George Ferman
Mistake number 7: Eating huge meals late at night and under the influence of artificial blue light. You can not always control this of course, but it's quite important. When we eat, matters. After all, the gastric acid secretion follows a circadian pattern and also, the esophageal valve should be closed at night. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25250617/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23512957/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25889354/ https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9963929/ https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147651324005128 https://frontiersin.org/journals/pharmacology/articles/10.3389/fphar.2024.1416350/full?utm_source=F-NTF&utm_medium=EMLX&utm_campaign=PRD_FEOPS_20170000_ARTICLE… https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235239642400210X https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9963929/ https://cell.com/cell-reports/fulltext/S2211-1247(17)30988-9…… https://cell.com/cell-metabolism/fulltext/S1550-4131(18)30253-5…… https://mdpi.com/2072-6643/12/2/503 https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4177396/ https://diabetesjournals.org/diabetes/article/72/10/1364/153373/Diurnal-Cycling-of-Insulin-Sensitivity-in-Type-2 https://frontiersin.org/journals/pharmacology/articles/10.3389/fphar.2024.1416350/full… https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34030374/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21155623/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7709998/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23696577/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26227889/
@Helios_Movement - George Ferman
Mistake number 8: Neglecting the power of herbs.
@Helios_Movement - George Ferman
The power of herbs is severely downplayed to this day in most health spaces but this is a huge mistake. So here's a thread on some powerful herbs that you should be aware of no matter if you struggle with hair loss, gut issues, low libido, anxiety, depression or insomnia🧵
@Helios_Movement - George Ferman
Mistake number 9: Treating foods like numbers on a screen. Macros matter, a lot. But food is not numbers on a screen, food is the fuel that provides us with the raw materials that our body needs in order to rebuild itself and its preparation was treated as something completely sacred in multiple cultures. When you view food as numbers on a screen, you don’t even appreciate it and there’s something completely unnatural with this viewpoint. Not to mention that you don’t even care about how it was sourced, the hidden effects that can have in your biology and multiple other things.
@Helios_Movement - George Ferman
Mistake number 10: Regularly cooking with Teflon and so on. The cookware you’re using can contribute to health issues such as thyroid disease, infertility, liver problems, kidney problems, insulin resistance and even cancer. You might think that i was full of shit and to be completely honest with you i wish i was… Over the last decades, you've probably noticed that things such as non-stick pans have become a standard in most people’s households. This is a problem. Non-stick pans are a health hazard. Let’s take Teflon for example. Note: Teflon = non-stick coating made of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) Teflon products up until 2013 (or 2015 depending on where you live), contained a compound known as C8 or PFOA perfluorooctanoic acid which was RUINING everyone's health (but C8 was linked to birth defects, cancer, infertility and in the United States 98% of people had PFOA in their bloodstream. Also, non-stick cookware will inevitably be coated with PTFE and PFAS which when heated release perfluorooctanoic acid which is also linked to diseases such as: thyroid disease, liver disease, infertility, and a lot of reproductive problems. Plus, most non-stick pans, literally have instructions that clearly state that "you should not heat these pans above medium heat" (mainly in order to not release toxic fumes), but almost no one i know does this.
@Helios_Movement - George Ferman
Mistake number 11: Not being aware of what deplete us of nutrients and tweaking your needs/avoiding them. Stimulants for example deplete electrolytes , B1, B2, B5 and Vitamin C. Statins deplete CoQ10 and Vitamin D (maybe also vitamin A and E depending on the dosage) Alcohol depletes B vitamins and electrolytes. Long term, alcohol will deplete Vitamin K as well. Antibiotics deplete B vitamins , Vitamin K and D. Heavy metals deplete minerals.
@Helios_Movement - George Ferman
Mistake number 12: Not knowing how to cover your micronutrient needs through food.
@Helios_Movement - George Ferman
That was pretty much it. I hope that you learned something from this thread. If you did make sure to leave a like/RT. For more on the topic of nutrition: https://fitandball.gumroad.com/l/thesystem23
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
REPORT: A new peer-reviewed study finds irrefutable evidence supporting IMMEDIATE market withdrawal of the COVID-19 injections. The authors noted that the total number of COVID-19 vaccine deaths reported to VAERS has "far exceeded the recall limits of past vaccine withdrawals by up to 375,340%." Furthermore, they believe the shots should be immediately pulled from the market for the following reasons. 1.) Excess mortality: 12 studies link mass COVID-19 vaccination to increased deaths, with autopsies showing a high likelihood of a causal connection. 2.) Negative efficacy: Vaccinated individuals face a higher risk of infection than the unvaccinated, with some studies showing up to a 253% increased risk for those with more than three doses. 3.) DNA contamination: COVID-19 vaccine batches contain DNA fragments at levels far exceeding regulatory safety limits set by the FDA and EMA. 4.) Historical recall comparison: Past vaccines were pulled after as few as 10 deaths, while VAERS has reported 37,544 deaths globally. 5.) Lack of clinical benefit: No large-scale, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials show reductions in infection, hospitalization, or death. 6.) Hippocratic Oath violation: Continued administration of COVID-19 vaccines contradicts the principle of “do no harm” and demands immediate withdrawal. Shout-out to Nicolas Hulscher, Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, and Dr. Peter McCullough for their excellent work on this paper. Video via @zeee_media and @ElijahSchaffer.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Can you trust your meat? Do you know where it comes from? Is it raised in America? Good Ranchers delivers high-quality, American-raised meat you can trust—no seed oils, antibiotics, or hormones ever. Taste the difference at goodranchers.com/VNN and use code VNN for $25 off.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
READ MORE: Peer-Reviewed Study Finds Irrefutable Evidence Supporting Immediate Market Withdrawal of COVID-19 “Vaccines” https://vigilantnews.com/post/peer-reviewed-study-finds-irrefutable-evidence-supporting-immediate-market-withdrawal-of-covid-19-vaccines/
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
DISTURBING: Yale researchers have found that some COVID jab recipients show signs of a depleted immune system and continue producing spike proteins years after the shot. “This is bad news. Very bad.” What was once called a “conspiracy theory” is now backed by science: vaccine spike proteins can linger in the body for years, potentially causing chronic inflammation and long-term health problems. Even more alarming, some patients experienced Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) reactivation, while others had dangerously low levels of vital immune cells. The COVID jabs were sold to us as the solution to “end the pandemic.” Instead, it looks like they wrecked the immune system and made things worse. Video via @ElijahSchaffer
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Did you know over 85% of the grass-fed beef in stores is imported? That’s because the Country of Origin Labeling Law was repealed in 2015. So now, meat can be packaged here in the US and earn a “Product of USA” label, even if it was born, raised, and harvested overseas. The truth is, much of the meat on the grocery store shelves is filled with things you don’t want—antibiotics, hormones, questionable origins, and even harmful seed oils. But at Good Ranchers, transparency isn’t just a buzzword; it’s a promise. All products at Good Ranchers have trustworthy ingredients. Their meat is born, raised, and harvested right here in the USA, so you know exactly where it comes from. It’s free from hidden additives – there are no antibiotics ever, no added hormones, and no seed oils. Just one simple ingredient you can read—and that’s meat. Subscribe to any box at GoodRanchers.com/VNN and use promo code VNN to get $25 off plus a free gift of chicken breasts, ground beef, or salmon for a year plus free express shipping. Taste the difference in meat quality for yourself at GoodRanchers.com/VNN.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
READ MORE ON THIS: Top Yale Scientists Find Disturbing Immune System Changes After COVID-19 Vaccination https://vigilantnews.com/post/top-yale-scientists-find-disturbing-immune-system-changes-after-covid-19-vaccination/
@BanounHelene - Hélène Banoun
Un Effet indésirable grave sur 800 doses Méthodes Analyse secondaire des effets indésirables graves rapportés dans les essais cliniques de phase III contrôlés versus placebo de la COVID-19 chez l'ADN de Pfizer et de l'ARNm de Moderna chez l'adulte (NCT04368728 et NCT04470427NCT04470427), en se concentrant sur l'analyse des événements indésirables de Brighton Collaboration présentant un intérêt particulier. Résultats Les vaccins contre la COVID-19 à l'ARNm Pfizer et Moderna ont été associés à un risque excessif d'événements indésirables graves présentant un intérêt particulier de 10,1 et 15,1 pour 10 000 vaccinés par rapport aux valeurs initiales du placebo de 17,6 et 42,2 (IC à 95 % -0,4 à 20,6 et -3,6 à 33,8), respectivement. Combinés, les vaccins à ARNm ont été associés à un risque excessif d'événements indésirables graves d'intérêt particulier de 12,5 pour 10 000 vaccinés (IC à 95 % 2,1 à 22,9); risque ratio 1,43 (IC 95 % de 1,07 à 1,92). L'étude Pfizer a montré un risque d'effets indésirables graves de 36 % dans le groupe vaccin ; différence de risque pour 10 000 vaccinaux (IC 95 % 1,2 à 34,9 ; rapport de risque) : 1,36 (IC à 95 % : 1,02 à 1,83). L'essai Moderna a présenté un risque de 6 % plus élevé d'événements indésirables graves dans le groupe vaccin: différence de risque de 7,1 pour 10 000 (IC à 95 % -23,2 à 37,4); rapport du risque relatif à 1,06 (IC à 95 % 0,84 à 1,33). Ensemble, le risque d'événements indésirables graves était de 16 % plus élevé chez les sujets vaccinés contre les ARNm: différence de risque de 13,2 (IC à 95 % -3,2 à 29,6); risque relatif à 1,16 (IC 95 % de 0,97 à 1,39). Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36055877/
@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
🚨COVID-19 mRNA shots act as chemical lobotomies — causing SEVERE brain damage & DEVASTATING mental health. They increase your risk of: 1️⃣ Cognitive impairment (+137.7%) 2️⃣ Depression (+68.3%) 3️⃣ Anxiety disorders (+43.9%) 4️⃣ Sleep disorders (+93.4%) 5️⃣ Alzheimer’s (+22.5%) 6️⃣ Ischemic stroke (+44%) 7️⃣ Hemorrhagic stroke (+50%) 8️⃣ Transient ischemic attack (+67%) 9️⃣ Myelitis (+165%) 🔟 Myasthenia gravis (+71%) ⚠️CDC/FDA safety thresholds breached (PRR ≥ 2 compared to flu shot) for 86 neuropsychiatric disorders, some of which include: 📈 Dementia – 140× more likely 📈 Suicidal thoughts – 150× more likely 📈 Homicidal ideation – 25× more likely 📈 Psychosis – 440× more likely 📈 Brain clots – 3,000× more likely 📈 Schizophrenia – 315× more likely 📈 Depression – 530× more likely 📈 Violent behavior – 80× more likely 📈 Cognitive decline – 115× more likely 📈 Delusions – 50× more likely This is likely due to toxic spike protein production and accumulation in the skull-meninges-brain axis.
@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
SOURCES 1. https://thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-study-identifies-86-serious 2. https://thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-study-covid-19-mrna-injection 3. https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/catastrophic-neurological-and-psychiatric
@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
How and Why Do COVID-19 "Vaccines" Cause Sudden Death Months to Years After Injection? Watch Here 👇
@P_McCulloughMD - Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®
COVID-19 Vaccine Myocarditis Directly Leads to Cardiac Arrest and Sudden Death as an Outcome Hulscher N, Hodkinson R, Makis W, McCullough PA. Autopsy findings in cases of fatal COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis. ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Jan 14. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14680. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38221509. @NicHulscher https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38221509/ https://youtu.be/EPk7G8tSiOg
@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
Our study is the first to fully define the syndrome known as "COVID-19 vaccine-induced cardiac arrest" 💉mRNA injection ↓ 🫀Heart Spike Protein Production ↓ ❤️🔥Myocarditis ↓ 🏃♂️Catecholamine Surge (Exercise or Waking Hours) ↓ ⚡️Arrhythmias ↓ 💔Sudden Cardiac Arrest ]https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11886387/
@AaronSiriSG - Aaron Siri
For anyone contemplating getting an influenza vaccine (flu shot) or planning to pressure or mandate someone else to get one: A meta-analysis of existing flu shot studies of healthy children by Cochrane (effectively owned by vaccine zealot Bill Gates) concluded that despite decades of published studies, it “could find no convincing evidence that [flu] vaccines can reduce mortality, hospital admissions, serious complications, or community transmission of influenza.” [1] Read that carefully: no convincing evidence—none—that flu shots lowered the chances of dying, being admitted to the hospital, suffering serious complications from the flu, or transmitting flu to others. In fact, studies have found those vaccinated for flu have a statistically significant increased rate of respiratory illnesses. Meaning, it increases the risk of having other respiratory illnesses. For example, a placebo-controlled efficacy (not safety) study by researchers at the University of Hong Kong compared children receiving influenza vaccine with those who did not receive the vaccine. The study found no statistical difference in the rate of influenza between the groups but did find the vaccinated had a four times increased rate of non-influenza infections (“recipients had an increased risk of virologically confirmed non-influenza infections (relative risk: 4.40; 95% confidence interval: 1.31-14.8)”). [2] As another example, researchers at Columbia University found that the risk of “influenza in individuals during the 14-day post-vaccination period was similar to unvaccinated individuals during the same period (HR 0.96, 95% CI [0.60, 1.52])” but that the risk of “non-influenza respiratory pathogens was higher [in the vaccinated individuals] during the same period (HR 1.65, 95% CI [1.14, 2.38]).” [3] A study by the Cleveland Clinic of 53,402 of its employees across multiple states even found an increased risk of influenza among those vaccinated for influenza, explaining that the “cumulative incidence of influenza was similar for the vaccinated and unvaccinated states early, but over the course of the study the cumulative incidence of influenza increased more rapidly among the vaccinated than the unvaccinated.” [4] I discuss these and other studies in my book, Vaccines, Amen. [5] That said: get a flu shot, don’t get a fu shot. That’s freedom. Everyone should be free to choose. But nobody should be coerced to get this or any medical product, especially, ironically, when the data reflects it has a net overall increase in infections. If you do choose to get this product and are injured, you are always free to call our firm to represent you in the vaccine injury compensation program. [6] Sources: [1]https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD004879.pub5/epdf/full [2]https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3404712/pdf/cis307.pdf [3]https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29525279/ [4]https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.01.30.25321421v3.full.pdf [5] https://a.co/d/0DwP3Ux [6]https://www.sirillp.com/vaccine-injury-attorneys/
@AaronSiriSG - Aaron Siri
Note: Bill Gates does not own the Cochrane Collaboration, rather his affiliated organizations have provided funding, direct and indirect, to the Cochrane Collaboration. There is also no indication the lead author in the review cited above has received any direct funding from the Gates foundation and he has affirmed as much in writing. It no doubt took courage and conviction to follow and publish the evidence when it revealed findings regarding the influenza vaccine in healthy children that is contrary to what public health authorities often claim about this product. He and his colleagues deserve credit for publishing this review knowing it would result in headwinds from those whose beliefs about this product it offends and whose financial interests it impacts.
@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
COVID-19 mRNA injections can cause sudden death years after injection by permanently damaging the heart with lethal micro-scars. Our study is the first to fully define the syndrome known as "COVID-19 vaccine-induced cardiac arrest"👇 https://t.co/9pYqqJ5sE3
@disclosetv - Disclose.tv
NEW - Covid mRNA injections can cause heart damage by triggering immune cells to go on the attack, scientists have found. https://t.co/Ou2ykeocex
