TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

CollinRugg
Posted - June 3, 2023 at 5:10 PM
Saved - June 4, 2023 at 2:47 AM

@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg

NEW: January 6 committee presented footage with doctored audio during primetime hearings. How about we investigate them and give them the same treatment they gave the J6ers? https://trendingpoliticsnews.com/january-6-committee-presented-footage-with-doctored-audio-cmc/?utm_source=collin&utm_medium=twitter

NEW: Jan 6 Committee Presented Footage With Doctored Audio During Primetime Hearings Just The News reporter John Solomon on Friday released unedited January 6 footage that proves the January 6 Select Committee presented footage with doctored trendingpoliticsnews.com
CollinRugg
Posted - July 23, 2023 at 11:58 PM
Saved - July 24, 2023 at 6:50 PM

@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg

House Republicans say texts and emails prove Pelosi’s office created and edited failed Capitol security plan on J6: https://trendingpoliticsnews.com/speaker-pelosi-denied-extra-resources-in-failed-january-6th-security/?utm_source=collin&utm_medium=twitter

Speaker Pelosi Denied Extra Resources in Failed January 6th Security House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was directly involved in the failed January 6th security and even called for less funding on the now infamous day. trendingpoliticsnews.com
greg_price11
Posted - September 20, 2023 at 5:29 PM
Saved - October 4, 2023 at 12:58 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony to the January 6 committee has been disputed by firsthand witnesses. She claimed that Trump assaulted Secret Service agents and tried to take control of the Beast, but both the lead agent and the driver testified that it wasn't true. Hutchinson also stated that Pat Cipollone warned her about allowing Trump to go to the Capitol, but witnesses confirmed Cipollone wasn't present. She mentioned a note from Mark Meadows, but former White House lawyer Eric Herschmann clarified that he wrote it. Hutchinson alleged that Jeff Clark strategized with Giuliani, but they never met. It's worth noting that she worked for Trump after January 6 and criticized the committee in private texts. Now she's selling a book and appearing on Maddow.

@greg_price11 - Greg Price

I just want to remind everyone that Cassidy Hutchinson is a proven liar and everything she told the January 6 committee under oath was disputed by firsthand witnesses. Lets review: Claim: Hutchinson testified that Donald Trump assaulted Secret Service agents and lunged for the wheel of the Beast on January 6 because they wouldn't take him to the Capitol. Reality: Lead Secret Service agent Bobby Engel, as well as the driver both testified under oath it wasn't true. Claim: Hutchinson testified that former White House Counsel Pat Cipollone personally warned her not to allow Trump to go to the Capitol or “We’re going to get charged with every crime imaginable.” Reality: According to multiple witnesses, Cipollone was not at the White House when Hutchinson claimed. Claim: Hutchinson testified that she was personally handwritten a note at the direction of Mark Meadows regarding a potential statement for then-President Donald Trump to release during the Jan. 6 attack. Reality: Former Trump White House lawyer Eric Herschmann released a statement saying he had in fact written the note. Claim: Hutchinson testified that former senior Justice Department official Jeff Clark strategized at the White House with Rudy Giuliani and the Trump campaign to object to the election. Reality: They never met each other. Additionally, she worked for Trump a full nine weeks after J6. In her private texts with friends, that were reported by the Federalist and Daily Caller at the time, she joked about the riot on J6, said the J6 committee was "phony" and "bullshit," and begged Trump officials for financial assistance after being subpoenaed by the committee. Now she's selling a book and going on Maddow.

@greg_price11 - Greg Price

Here are the links to the Daily Caller and Federalist stories about Cassidy Hutchinson's private texts where she was shitting all over the J6 committee before deciding to lie for them. https://thefederalist.com/2022/07/26/exclusive-in-private-cassidy-hutchinson-joked-about-riot-called-j6-committee-phony-praised-trump-before-changing-story/ https://dailycaller.com/2022/07/03/obtained-text-message-cassidy-hutchinson-called-january-6-committee-bs-before-testifying/

EXCLUSIVE: Private Chats Show Cassidy Hutchinson's Flip-Flop Hutchinson commiserated with other targets of the probe about how little information she had about any wrongdoing on Jan. 6. thefederalist.com
EXCLUSIVE: Text Messages Show Cassidy Hutchinson Referring To January 6 Committee As ‘BS’ The January 6 committee's key witness, Cassidy Hutchinson, called the committee "bs" in a text message obtained exclusively by the Daily Caller. dailycaller.com
laralogan
Posted - December 1, 2023 at 5:09 AM
Saved - December 1, 2023 at 5:39 AM

@laralogan - Lara Logan

Vanished! House panel chairman says J6 videotapes of witness interviews missing | Just The News https://justthenews.com/government/congress/vanished-house-panel-chairman-says-j6-videotapes-witness-interviews-missing

Vanished! House panel chairman says J6 videotapes of witness interviews missing Rep. Barry Loudermilk says some J6 documents missing too, and came back from Biden White House heavily redacted. justthenews.com
kylenabecker
Posted - December 1, 2023 at 1:58 PM
Saved - December 1, 2023 at 2:04 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a flashback moment, Trump accused the January 6th committee of destroying evidence. NBC's Kristen Welker interrupted, but now it seems witness depositions have mysteriously vanished. Trump was right, and the media is complicit in the committee's cover-up. House Republicans confirm the disappearance of certain J6 committee videos. Unbelievable.

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

Flashback: Remember when Trump got interrupted by NBC hack @kwelkernbc for saying the J6 committee 'destroyed all the evidence'? "The January 6th Unselect Committee of Thugs and Horrible People... destroyed all the evidence," Trump said. "They say they didn't do that," Welker interrupted. "We did ask them. We did ask the January 6th committee." "Well, they announced that they destroyed and deleted most of the evidence." "They say some of the evidence is still under review. I want to know about your perspective..." she went on. "Wait. Kristen, I want to ask. They put out an announcement that they destroyed the evidence and they destroyed all the stuff having to do with Nancy Pelosi and they wouldn't let her testify." "We said, why isn't she testifying? It was a whole rigged deal. Why isn't she testifying? I offered them 10,000 soldiers. She turned them down..." Now, it comes out that there are witness depositions that have reportedly 'vanished.' Donald Trump was right. And the corporate media is part of the J6 committee cover-up. Unbelievable.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the police commissioner's refusal to let Nancy Pelosi testify and accuses the January 6th committee of destroying evidence. They express frustration over the committee's announcement of evidence destruction, particularly related to Nancy Pelosi. The speaker questions why she wasn't allowed to testify and mentions offering a sum of money.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He turned it down flat, and the police commissioner was very nasty about it to her, and he testified. And here's what happened. The January 6th unselect unselect committee of thugs and horrible people, the unselect committee destroyed all the evidence. They say they didn't do that. They we did ask them. We did ask the January 6th well, they announced that they destroyed and deleted most of the evidence. They say some of the evidence is still under review. I wanna know what well, well, well, I wanna know about your Mister White Crescent I wanna ask you they put out an announcement that they destroyed the evidence, and they destroyed all the stuff having to do with Nancy Pelosi, and they wouldn't let her testify. We said, why isn't she testify? You know, it was a whole rig deal. Why isn't she testifying? I offered them 10,000 to 12 as she turned them. I

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

@kwelkernbc See more: House Republican Confirms that Certain J6 Committee Videos Have ‘Vanished’ https://thepoliticsbrief.com/house-republican-confirms-that-certain-j6-committee-videos-have-vanished/

House Republican Confirms that Certain J6 Committee Videos Have 'Vanished' The reported disappearance of videotapes of witness interviews of depositions conducted by the now-disbanded Jan. 6 congressional committee, which was led by the Democrats, is raising serious issues about the integrity of that J6 committee. There are now grave doubts about that J6 committee's activities as an "investigative" body; the signs are increasingly pointing to thepoliticsbrief.com
TPC4USA
Posted - December 7, 2023 at 9:42 PM
Saved - December 8, 2023 at 4:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
An anonymous letter on Capitol Police letterhead, circulated to Congress members, raises concerns. Capitol Police does not issue anonymous press releases, and the letter violates employee regulations. The officer's identity is known, but hidden. The officer's disciplinary action was not disclosed before testifying in J6 trials. The Blaze plans to reveal more details soon. The cover-ups and lies by Capitol Police and the Justice Department related to January 6 are being exposed. Pelosi's security chief's testimony in the Oath Keepers trial is questioned. Harry Dunn's account of January 6 is questionable. The Truth About January 6 is explored in two parts: David Lazarus and Harry Dunn.

@TPC4USA - Steve Baker - TPC

🚨THREAD🚨: This anonymous letter on @CapitolPolice letterhead was distributed to members of the Capitol press pool and circulated by Rep. Jamie Raskin’s office to other Congress members on the evening of May 19, 2021. There are a few big problems…⬇️

@TPC4USA - Steve Baker - TPC

…with this letter. As a department, @capitolpolice does not issue anonymous press releases. Indeed, not of a political nature. This letter, drafted by a USCP officer, violates several USCP employee regulations.⬇️ https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/05/capitol-police-letter-mcconell-mccarthy

Capitol Officers Blast Republicans for Fighting a 1/6 Investigation, Suggest Lawmakers Would Be Dead If Not for Them “It is a privileged assumption for Members to have the point of view that ‘it wasn’t that bad.’ That privilege exists because the brave men and women of the USCP protected you, the Members.” vanityfair.com

@TPC4USA - Steve Baker - TPC

Most egregiously, the author violated many departmental directives against using USCP time and resources for political purposes. @theblaze has learned that @CapitolPolice knows the identity of the officer who wrote this letter. @TheBlaze also knows the identity of the officer.⬇️

@TPC4USA - Steve Baker - TPC

@theblaze has also learned that certain members of the Capitol press pool assisted the officer in drafting this letter. Both @capitolpolice and those media members have hidden this officer’s identity from the public.⬇️ https://www.cbsnews.com/news/capitol-police-letter-january-6-commission-republicans/

Letter claiming to represent Capitol Police officers expresses support for January 6 commission CBS News obtained the anonymous letter that the author claims represents 40 to 50 U.S. Capitol Police officers. cbsnews.com

@TPC4USA - Steve Baker - TPC

The most ominous aspect of what appears to be a low-level cover-up is that details related to this officer’s follow-up disciplinary action by @capitolpolice were not revealed to defense teams by @TheJusticeDept before this officer testified in J6 trials. (Brady violation?)⬇️

@TPC4USA - Steve Baker - TPC

@TheBlaze will be doing a full reveal of this cover-up’s details in the coming days. While we have contacted @capitolpolice for comment on numerous occasions - and have always been ignored - I want to invite the department again to contact me.⬇️

@TPC4USA - Steve Baker - TPC

We know that @capitolpolice is aware of and is following our stories on Officer Harry Dunn and Special Agent David Lazarus, as our sources at USCP keep us informed of internal comms. Your FYSA on my Lazarus thread was a little premature, as…⬇️

@TPC4USA - Steve Baker - TPC

…it has now been seen by millions via more prominent influencers’ quote shares. Also, @theblaze has finally received permission to release videos showing the lies of SA Lazarus and @libradunn. Those are now in production and will be revealed any day.⬇️

@TPC4USA - Steve Baker - TPC

🚨THREAD🚨: Regarding @theblaze 's recent story about @CapitolPolice Special Agent David Lazarus's Oath Keeper trial testimony, we are pleased to finally be able to release a statement from @RepLoudermilk, followed by never-before-seen screenshots from Capitol CCTV video...⬇️

@TPC4USA - Steve Baker - TPC

All of this is just the beginning in a long series of reveals being prepared by @theblaze about the cover-ups and lies by @capitolpolice and @TheJusticeDept - and, apparently, those lies of omission from “trusted” media sources - related to January 6.⬇️

@Olivia_Beavers - Olivia Beavers

NEWS: MEMBERS of the U.S. Capitol Police have issued a statement to members of Congress expressing "profound disappointment" with McConnell and McCarthy's positions on the Jan. 6 commission, citing the "trauma" that officers endured that day.

@TPC4USA - Steve Baker - TPC

Analysis: Did Pelosi’s security chief perjure himself in Oath Keepers trial?⬇️ https://www.theblaze.com/columns/analysis/analysis-did-pelosis-security-chief-perjure-himself-in-oath-keepers-trial

Analysis: Did Pelosi’s security chief perjure himself in Oath Keepers trial? | Blaze Media The Capitol Police officer assigned to the protective detail of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on January 6, 2021, appears to have given false testimony about his whereabouts during a key encounter with members of the Oath Keepers, according to an examination of Capitol closed-circuit TV vi... theblaze.com

@TPC4USA - Steve Baker - TPC

January 6 and the N-word that wasn’t ⬇️ https://www.theblaze.com/columns/analysis/january-6-and-the-n-word-that-wasnt

January 6 and the N-word that wasn’t | Blaze Media United States Capitol Police Officer Harry Dunn has been celebrated as a hero for his actions on January 6, 2021, and his public statements since. Earlier this year, President Joe Biden awarded him the Presidential Citizens Medal to great fanfare. But the story he told that first made headlines no... theblaze.com

@TPC4USA - Steve Baker - TPC

Harry Dunn’s account of January 6 does not add up. At all.⬇️ https://www.theblaze.com/columns/analysis/harry-dunns-account-of-january-6-does-not-add-up-at-all

Harry Dunn’s account of January 6 does not add up. At all. | Blaze Media A review of hundreds of hours of video evidence from the day does not corroborate the Capitol Hill police officer’s account. theblaze.com

@TPC4USA - Steve Baker - TPC

The Truth About January 6 - Part I: David Lazarus ⬇️ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t322flEI3Mk

@TPC4USA - Steve Baker - TPC

The Truth About January 6 - Part II: Harry Dunn https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQTjkfYd9bo

julie_kelly2
Posted - December 8, 2023 at 2:47 AM
Saved - December 8, 2023 at 8:59 PM

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

A congressional aide confirmed to me that Biden's DHS refuses to turn over witness testimony given to Pelosi's J6 committee by Secret Service officials. More cover-up by the Biden regime and House Democrats as the J6 narrative continues to unravel. https://www.declassified.live/p/more-missing-j6-committee-evidence

More Missing J6 Committee Evidence: Where are Secret Service Records? In addition to deleted texts belonging to two dozen top Secret Service officials, "numerous" transcribed interviews taken by the J6 committee have not been turned over to House Republicans. declassified.live
Lancegooden
Posted - January 11, 2024 at 1:56 PM
Saved - January 11, 2024 at 2:23 PM

@Lancegooden - Lance Gooden

This is a bombshell report. Adam Kinzinger, Liz Cheney, and the other January 6th committee members, should preserve their records. Subpoenas are coming. https://t.co/cvuI1QANRX

DesireeAmerica4
Posted - January 11, 2024 at 3:40 PM
Saved - January 11, 2024 at 4:11 PM

@DesireeAmerica4 - 🔥Desiree🔥

Adam Kinzinger and Liz Cheney could see subpoenas coming for helping Fani Willis prepare for interviews with key witnesses.

@DesireeAmerica4 - 🔥Desiree🔥

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/01/10/jan-6-georgia-trump-probe-00134941

Jan. 6 committee helped guide early days of Georgia Trump probe In the spring of 2022, the committee staff helped Fulton County prosecutors prepare for interviews with key witnesses. politico.com
Real_RobN
Posted - March 18, 2024 at 3:36 PM
Saved - March 18, 2024 at 8:12 PM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And here is, the FACE the VOICE and the CRIMINAL of the J6 Committee @Liz_Cheney got caught • TRAFFICKED evidence • ALTERED evidence • DESTROYED evidence • REDACTED evidence • HID evidence She in fact withheld her own interview of her own star witness with her own members https://t.co/o6ait20tLz

Video Transcript AI Summary
We made progress in accessing documents hidden by the executive branch to keep them from the public. Some documents went to the White House and DHS. We obtained redacted testimonies from White House employees, revealing discrepancies with the select committee's narrative. DHS delayed sharing documents, but recently allowed access. The crucial transcribed interview we sought was missing. The destruction of deposition videotapes was a significant breach of trust and house rules.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've made progress in actually getting access to some of the documents that they moved to, the executive branch, in my opinion, which was to keep it from, public view and keep it from us. Four documents went to the White House. Eight documents went to Department of Homeland Security. We were able to get the redacted copies of the testimonies of White House employees which we included in our report, and through pressuring the White House, we're finally they never gave us unredacted copies but they allowed us to come to the White House and review the unredacted copies. And after looking at it, we realized there's enough in the red that that was remained unredacted in the copies they sent us that showed a different story than what the select committee, was presenting. DHS for months they just went silent on us. Now they're telling us, oh we still haven't finished our review of these documents. It's been well over a year. They're slow walking it it, but we have at least now have, Homeland Security is, as of last week said, well, look, you can come look at these documents as well. But for some reason, they sent us the key document that we were looking for which was the transcribed interview of the driver of the SUV that Trump was supposedly take the steering wheel from. So we did make some, progress there. We're still trying to break passwords, but the biggest, I think, violation of public trust and house rules was the destruction or the hiding of the videotapes of all the depositions. Those I think, are are clearly, they admitted to getting rid of those. And so of of everything that they've done, I think that is the biggest violation. Let's dig in a little
Video Transcript AI Summary
The missing ornato interview revealed that Trump offered up to 10,000 troops to the committee. Vanity Fair reported Trump offered National Guard in January. White House employees confirmed Trump's response to the Capitol attack was to offer help. Pelosi and Bowser turned down the National Guard offer.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We knew that he had done multiple, transcribed interviews with the committee, but there was one that was just commonly referred to as the missing ornato, interview. And our team, through a lot of diligence and digging, we were able to find that. And exactly what you just said was in there, that he had testified to the committee that he heard the conversation with, the with Mark Meadows offering up to 10,000 troops. And even in early January, not long after the attack on the Capitol, Vanity Fair of all publications had ran an article that Trump had offered National Guard and told, secretary Miller, you have full authorization to get the guard ready. That was in January by a liberal publication, so there is much more evidence. We even have evidence from the White House, transcribed interviews that we received from the White House employees where one of them said that, responded to a question by the select committee which was when President Trump first heard of the attack on the Capitol what was his response? And this White House employee who is physically with the president that day said his immediate response was get Pelosi and Milley on the phone and see what help they need. There are several instances of on the record where he had offered and even was trying to get, you know, the people to take the National Guard. But it was it was Pelosi. It was Bowser that turned down the offer.
Video Transcript AI Summary
After the 3rd interview, Liz Cheney arranged a 4th secret interview with only her, a court reporter, and a videographer. The committee rushed an emergency hearing to showcase her sensational stories without verifying them. They avoided asking questions that could contradict her testimony.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: After her 3rd transcribed interview, she had a meeting with Liz Cheney. After that meeting, she fired her existing attorney. Liz Cheney arranged for her to get a different attorney, and then they held a another a 4th transcribed interview. But unlike the others, this was just her and Liz Cheney and Liz's hideaway office in the Capitol, and the only others present was a court reporter and a videographer. No other member of the committee knew that this interview was going on. Afterwards, they, Liz Cheney showed the videotape of her testimony and the committee moved to have an emergency hearing at that moment to parade her in front of America that she could tell these sensational stories. They never tried to corroborate her story at all. In fact, going forward, I told our team as we start looking at all these transcribed interviews, don't just look at the way people answer questions. Look at the questions that were asked and more importantly the questions that weren't asked. And many times they would not ask firsthand. People had a firsthand account of these instances they wouldn't even ask these questions because they didn't want anyone to, you know, give a testimony counter to what, Cassidy Hutchinson had testified. And that includes the so called
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses how a story about Donald Trump grabbing a Secret Service agent's neck was fabricated. The driver and others present that day denied it happened. The committee ignored evidence contradicting the narrative they wanted to push. Destroyed material likely went against their agenda. Liz Cheney is the prominent figure in this committee. Translation: The speaker talks about a false story involving Donald Trump and a Secret Service agent. Evidence disproving the story was ignored. Destroyed material likely contradicted their agenda. Liz Cheney is a key figure in this committee.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Where she conveys this story where Donald Trump is struggling with the secret service agent who's driving the car, grabs them by the neck, which is so preposterous. She wasn't there, so she it's all hearsay, if worse. They put it in front of the clig lights. It's headlines everywhere, but they didn't bring in the people who are actually involved that day, including the driver, the secret service driver, and the others, who I understand from you and your report said none of that ever happened. Correct? Speaker 1: That is correct. But he had to interject that. So she made these accusations in June. They didn't call the driver in until September. Of course, this is already national news and they're pushing this narrative that Trump is this irate guy, who's crazy, who's tried to choke a secret service officer, tried to grab, the steering wheel from this guy. You would think when they bring this guy in, that is one thing they would ask him. They didn't even ask him if that that incident was true. He had to interject it on his own. That right there tells me they did not want to get to the truth. They had their predetermined narrative. They were gonna suppress anything that countered these sensational stories that, miss Hutchinson came up with. And again, hers was third party. She said she heard Tony Ornato. Tony Ornado called her over after the speech on the lips and said, did you hear what happened in the beast? Tony Ornado testified in the same transcribed interview that we released. That never happened. He never told her anything like that and had never heard of that story at all until she testified to it in June. And so it it again, they suppressed anything that was contrary to what miss Hutchinson said because her story played right into the narrative that they want to sell the American people. Speaker 0: You have to assume all this material that was destroyed, interviews and all the rest, actually cut against their narrative. Otherwise, why would they destroy it? That is a perfectly, legitimate infotential. Somebody ordered it, and you have to assume they're witnesses to this. Liz Cheney has made herself the face and the voice of this committee.

@Liz_Cheney - Liz Cheney

Lying in all caps doesn’t make it true, Donald. You know you and your lawyers have long had the evidence.

RogerJStoneJr
Posted - April 16, 2024 at 4:57 AM
Saved - April 16, 2024 at 2:38 PM

@RogerJStoneJr - Roger Stone

BREAKING: One of the star witnesses for the Jan. 6 Committee, Cassidy Hutchinson, changed 47 answers after she testified to the panel four times, a newly revealed document shows. She certainly LIED about me https://stonezone.com/roger-stone-adds-two-more-lies-to-list-of-lies-made-by-liz-cheneys-star-witness-cassidy-hutchinson/

BOTH LIZ CHENEY AND CASSIDY HUTCHINSON LIED IN THE JANUARY 6 COMMITTEE HEARING - StoneZone On June 28th, Cassidy Hutchinson, a former aide to White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, was a surprise witness in the January 6th committee hearings. Although heavily hyped as a “surprise witness” with startling “new information” much of what Cassidy said was both eagerly reported as “fact” by the mainstream media and just as […] stonezone.com
greg_price11
Posted - October 15, 2024 at 9:12 PM
Saved - October 16, 2024 at 1:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that the House Administration's Subcommittee on Oversight obtained Cassidy Hutchinson's Signal messages. She was in direct contact with Liz Cheney and communicated indirectly through Alyssa Farrah, who assisted in getting Hutchinson new lawyers.

@greg_price11 - Greg Price

BREAKING: The House Oversight Committee obtained Cassidy Hutchinson’s Signal messages. Hutchinson was directly communicating with Liz Cheney, and indirectly through Alyssa Farrah, as Cheney was leading the January 6 Committee. Cheney also helped Hutchinson get new lawyers

@greg_price11 - Greg Price

Correction: This came from the House Administration's Subcommittee on Oversight. Not the Oversight Committee. https://cha.house.gov/2024/10/new-texts-reveal-liz-cheney-communicated-with-cassidy-hutchinson-about-her-select-committee-testimony-without-hutchinson-s-attorney-s-knowledge-despite-cheney-knowing-it-was-unethical

New Texts Reveal Liz Cheney Communicated with Cassidy Hutchinson About Her Select Committee Testimony—without Hutchinson’s Attorney’s Knowledge—Despite Cheney Knowing it was Unethical U.S. House of Representatives Committee on House Administration cha.house.gov
amuse
Posted - October 16, 2024 at 12:58 AM
Saved - October 16, 2024 at 2:57 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been following the situation involving former Rep. Liz Cheney and her communications with Cassidy Hutchinson, a witness for the January 6th Committee. Reports indicate Cheney may have engaged in unethical behavior by contacting Hutchinson without her lawyer's knowledge, which raises concerns about potential witness tampering. Hutchinson later altered her testimony, making claims that were debunked by Secret Service agents. While some speculate about Cheney facing disciplinary action, the likelihood seems low given the history of the D.C. Bar's leniency towards certain individuals.

@amuse - @amuse

WITNESS TAMPERING: Former Rep. Liz Cheney reportedly began secretly communicating with a January 6th Committee witness without informing the witness's lawyer—an clear ethical violation that could cost Cheney her law license. More concerning than the ethical breach, however, is the possibility that her actions could be perceived as witness tampering, or even constitute actual tampering. After starting secret communications with Cheney, Cassidy Hutchinson changed her testimony, alleging that President Trump had grabbed the steering wheel of the presidential limousine. This claim was later debunked by multiple Secret Service agents, who testified that such an event did not occur and that it was also physically impossible.

@amuse - @amuse

WITNESS TAMPERING: Before getting too excited about the idea of former Rep. Liz Cheney being disbarred (let alone prosecuted), keep in mind that we're talking about the Democrat-controlled D.C. Bar—the same bar that only temporarily suspended Hunter Biden's license after his felony conviction. They also gave Kevin Clinesmith, who was convicted of falsifying evidence for a FISA warrant, just a one-year suspension. Meanwhile, if you're a Republican like Rudy Giuliani, they'll disbar you even if you've never been convicted of a crime. It seems Liz Cheney's license is as safe and secure as the 2020 election results.

@amuse - @amuse

WITNESS TAMPERING: New Texts Reveal Liz Cheney Communicated with Cassidy Hutchinson About Her Select Committee Testimony—without Hutchinson’s Attorney’s Knowledge—Despite Cheney Knowing it was Unethical. https://cha.house.gov/2024/10/new-texts-reveal-liz-cheney-communicated-with-cassidy-hutchinson-about-her-select-committee-testimony-without-hutchinson-s-attorney-s-knowledge-despite-cheney-knowing-it-was-unethical

New Texts Reveal Liz Cheney Communicated with Cassidy Hutchinson About Her Select Committee Testimony—without Hutchinson’s Attorney’s Knowledge—Despite Cheney Knowing it was Unethical U.S. House of Representatives Committee on House Administration cha.house.gov
julie_kelly2
Posted - October 21, 2024 at 2:22 PM
Saved - October 21, 2024 at 7:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The situation surrounding Cassidy Hutchinson and Liz Cheney continues to escalate. Rep. Loudermilk engaged a handwriting expert to examine a note Hutchinson claimed to have written on January 6. Cheney showcased this note during a televised J6 committee hearing, asserting it was dictated by Mark Meadows for Trump. However, WH lawyer Eric Herschmann contested Hutchinson's assertion, claiming he authored the note, and an expert has now validated his statement. This raises serious questions about Hutchinson's credibility.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

NEW: Cassidy Hutchinson/Liz Cheney scandal keeps getting worse. @RepLoudermilk hired a handwriting expert to analyze a note Hutchinson testified under oath she had composed the afternoon of January 6. Cheney held up the note, which was part of a statement dictated by Mark Meadows for Trump to post as the events of Jan 6 unfolded, during a J6 committee televised performance. WH lawyer Eric Herschmann immediately disputed Hutchinson’s claim and said he wrote the note. An expert just confirmed Herschmann’s account. Cassidy Hutchinson appears to be a pathological liar and perjurer.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Background here https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-white-house-attorney-disputes-cassidy-hutchinsons-testimony/story?id=85898838

Trump White House attorney disputes Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony about handwritten note A former Trump White House lawyer is disputing ex-White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony that she penned a handwritten note regarding the Jan. 6 Capitol attack. abcnews.go.com
DC_Draino
Posted - December 9, 2024 at 9:37 PM
Saved - December 9, 2024 at 11:34 PM

@DC_Draino - DC_Draino

Liz Cheney suppressed evidence showing Trump’s innocence on J6 Now she’s threatening any lawyers trying to investigate what she did She’s scared of what’s coming next https://t.co/Fmf43hGxMB

@jackunheard - Jack

🚨BREAKING: Liz Cheney warns that any lawyer who investigates members of the January 6th committee will be engaging in conduct subject to sanctions.

JohnStrandUSA
Posted - December 17, 2024 at 3:47 PM
Saved - December 17, 2024 at 4:12 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

BREAKING: Bombshell GOP report just released says @Liz_Cheney should be investigated by the FBI for possible criminal activity for her role in the infamous J6 committee. Tampering with a witness & evidence is a 20-year felony—I would know I was wrongfully put in prison for it. https://t.co/b046dUFWNd

JackPosobiec
Posted - December 17, 2024 at 5:05 PM
Saved - December 17, 2024 at 7:54 PM

@JackPosobiec - Jack Poso 🇺🇸

Here are @Liz_Cheney's text messages with Cassidy Hutchinson They show multiple calls between Cheney and Hutchinson, without lawyers present In fact, Hutchinson was sharing her lawyer's private text messages with Cheney https://t.co/m16gcl8tuv

RogerJStoneJr
Posted - December 19, 2024 at 5:52 AM
Saved - December 20, 2024 at 3:33 PM

@RogerJStoneJr - Roger Stone

Both Liz Cheney, and the witness she illegally coached ,Cassidy Hutchinson LIED in the January 6 Hearings https://stonezone.com/roger-stone-adds-two-more-lies-to-list-of-lies-made-by-liz-cheneys-star-witness-cassidy-hutchinson/

BOTH LIZ CHENEY AND CASSIDY HUTCHINSON LIED IN THE JANUARY 6 COMMITTEE HEARING - StoneZone On June 28th, Cassidy Hutchinson, a former aide to White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, was a surprise witness in the January 6th committee hearings. Although heavily hyped as a “surprise witness” with startling “new information” much of what Cassidy said was both eagerly reported as “fact” by the mainstream media and just as […] stonezone.com
julie_kelly2
Posted - December 22, 2024 at 4:09 PM
Saved - December 23, 2024 at 4:40 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read the transcript of the Secret Service driver from January 6, 2021, released by Rep. Loudermilk. The driver wanted to testify right after the events, but the J6 committee delayed the interview until just before the 2022 election. He confirmed that under Biden, the Secret Service ordered agents to wipe their phones, violating federal records law, especially since Congress was investigating the events. The driver also directly refuted Cassidy Hutchinson's claims about an alleged assault by Trump, which no one, including Liz Cheney, planned to address during questioning.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Reading transcript of Secret Service driver of the presidential vehicle on Jan 6, 2021 released last week by @RepLoudermilk As reported earlier, the driver wanted to testify to the J6 committee immediately following what we now know is perjured testimony by Cassidy Hutchinson. J6 committee waited until the day before the 2022 election--one in which Republicans were predicted to win back the House--to interview the driver. The driver's atty noted the committee's months-long resistance to conducting the interview.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

The driver confirms what I have been reporting since 2021: the Secret Service under Joe Biden ordered agents to wipe their cell phones. This included messages from before, on, and after Jan 6. This is in violation of federal records law and represents another federal crime since the events of Jan 6 were under investigation by Congress. Every agency received a preservation letter by Democratic-led House committees BEFORE the phones were wiped. The texts were never recovered. House GOP should subpoena every cell phone provider for the records including official and personal cell phones of USSS officials involved in the deletion of records such as the then acting director and Kim Cheatle, a top USSS official on Jan 6.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

During committee questioning of the limo driver, it became clear no one--including Liz Cheney=-planned to ask about the alleged assault by Pres Trump. So the driver's lawyer (Zach Terwilliger) had to bring it up himself. The driver DIRECTLY REFUTED Cassidy Hutchinson's claims https://t.co/nfPuY9fb7i

julie_kelly2
Posted - December 22, 2024 at 6:41 PM
Saved - December 22, 2024 at 7:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a tense exchange from November 2022, Liz Cheney confronts Zach Terwilliger, the attorney for the USSS driver involved in the January 6 events. Cheney demands to know the contents of a note Terwilliger passed to his client, expressing frustration over the unraveling testimony of Cassidy Hutchinson. Terwilliger insists he's not coaching the witness and emphasizes the importance of truth. Cheney dismisses his concerns, insisting on avoiding "secret notes" during the interview. The interaction highlights Cheney's aggressive approach and her commitment to uncovering the truth.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Here is the Nov 2022 exchange between Liz Cheney and the attorney (Zach Terwilliger) representing the USSS driver of the presidential limo on Jan 6. She demands to know the content of a note Terwilliger passed to his client. She is angry that the false accounts given under oath by her pet project, Cassidy Hutchinson, are disintegrating. This is the sort of nasty, tyrannical b*tch Cheney is: Ms. Cheney: I'm sorry. Just a second. Sorry, Marc. I just wanted to check and make sure that the special agent just read a note from his counsel. Driver: What's that, ma'am? I'm sorry. Ms. Cheney: Did you just read a note from your counsel, Special Agent? Driver: I did. Ms. Cheney: And what does that note say? Terwilliger: Congresswoman, I'm happy to read it. I would think that would be privileged between my client and I, but I'm happy to read it because I don't want there to be any innuendo. I drafted it and what I said was, 'Did you ever tell your colleagues the President grabbed the wheel or grabbed Mr. Engel or that the President lunged forward?' That's what my note says. And I was hoping Mr. Harris was going to come back and ask that question. Cheney: I appreciate you're not coaching the witness, counsel, during the interview. And it's not privileged during the interview. Thank you. Terwilliger: Well, I'm certainly not coaching the witness, and I certainly don't appreciate being insinuated that way. There are questions that this committee needs to ask this witness in order to bring the truth forward. I would assume you want all the information that this witness, this voluntary witness, wants. Cheney: Mr. Terwilliger, there's certainly no reason for histrionics. I think that this committee has demonstrated very clearly, including through other interviews, at least one in which you've been the counsel, that we are very interested, more interested than certainly you are in getting to the truth here. So appreciate your concern for the committee, but, again, I would ask you not to coach the witness during the interview. Terwilliger: Well, I'm not coaching the witness, and I'm certainly not going to accept your supposition that I'm not interested in the truth. I'm very interested in the truth. And I think this witness, as he's made clear, Congresswoman, has a lot he can offer. But if we want to trade barbs and waste time, that's fine. Cheney: Thank you. Let's try to avoid notes to the witness during the interview. Appreciate that. Terwilliger: Well, we'll just continue to take breaks then, if that's what you'd prefer because the witness has a right to confer with his counsel. Cheney: He does. That is certainly right. So if you'd like to take a break, you may certainly ask to do so. We'd prefer not to have secret notes during the interview. Thank you. Terwilliger: The notes aren't secret as I just made clear by reading it out loud into the record. Cheney: Thank you. Appreciate that. So according to Cheney--who is a lawyer--prompting your client to go on the record during a sworn deposition to refute other sworn testimony that resulted in deceiving the public and making false accusations about a former president is "coaching" the witness and contrary to seeking the truth. This c u next Tuesday belongs in prison for a long long time.

julie_kelly2
Posted - December 24, 2024 at 3:07 PM
Saved - December 24, 2024 at 10:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve learned that Johnson blocked a subpoena for Cassidy Hutchinson, who may have committed perjury, possibly at Liz Cheney's direction. Johnson denied this, but I believe he should publicly demand a subpoena for both Hutchinson and Cheney. There's concern about the J6 investigation being undermined by current leadership, particularly Bryan Steil, who hasn’t actively supported the subcommittee’s work. The lies propagated by Hutchinson and Cheney have caused real damage, and accountability can only come through subpoenas and potential criminal referrals.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

This report confirms what my own Congressional sources have said: Johnson blocked a subpoena for Cassidy Hutchinson, who appears to have committed perjury and perhaps at the direction of Liz Cheney. Johnson denied this is true. So the best way to come clean is to publicly demand a congressional subpoena for Hutchinson and perhaps Liz Cheney herself. Further, Johnson's claim that he will elevate the J6 investigation to the full committee level is welcome news unless that gives @RepLoudermilk's gavel to current House Adm Committee Chairman Bryan Steil, who my sources also say has been unsupportive of the subcommittee's efforts. You'd be hard pressed to find Steil amplifying the important work of his own subcommittee. I believe he has only attended one subcommittee hearing on the investigation into J6 and the J6 committee. The American people demand the truth about the events of Jan 6 and a full accounting of the lies told by chief propagandists including @Liz_Cheney, which includes criminal referrals. Johnson and Steil cannot get in the way of this. It's a travesty that the GOP congress did not create a special J6 committee--time to fix that and let the lawmakers devoted to truth and accountability run the show. https://breitbart.com/politics/2024/12/23/exclusive-speaker-johnson-denies-blocking-rep-barry-loudermilk-subcommittees-subpoena-cassidy-hutchinson/ via the

Exclusive: Speaker Johnson Denies Blocking Subpoena of Cassidy Hutchinson The House subcommittee investigating former Speaker Nancy Pelosi's January 6 Special Committee "interviewed hundreds of witnesses," but testimony from the most notorious star of Pelosi's hearings is conspicuously absent from the subcommittee's report. breitbart.com

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

The lies manufactured by Hutchinson--and likely with help from Cheney---created real life damage. They tried to destroy Hutchinson's first attorney, Stefan Passantino, by first luring him into what he suspected was a criminal obstruction trap. Cheney publicly smeared Passantino by attempting to use him as the fall guy for Hutchinson's dramatically changed testimony which included the fabricated story about a physical confrontation between Trump and occupants of the presidential limo on Jan 6. Cheney was behind TWO bar complaints against Passantino in GA and DC. (Now Cheney is the target of a DC bar complaint for violating legal ethics rules by conferring with the client of another attorney.) Further, their lies were intended to inflict maximum political damage to Trump right before he announced his run for re-election. Luckily, some smart people on the Right who do not contribute to National Review quickly mocked Hutchinson's obvious false account of what happened. But the media reporting on Hutchinson's perjured testimony remains intact without any corrections or retractions. The only way to hold this pair accountable is issuing subpoenas, releasing the transcripts of the interviews, and filing criminal referrals to a Trump DOJ if appropriate. https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2024/10/29/as_liz_cheney_slams_trumps_character_her_integrity_comes_under_fire_1068213.html

As Liz Cheney Slams Donald Trump’s Character, Her Integrity Comes Under Fire Liz Cheney, a staunch “Never Trump” former Republican representative, has joined Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris in key swing states in the final days of the campaign to warn realclearinvestigations.com
julie_kelly2
Posted - December 29, 2024 at 4:43 PM
Saved - December 30, 2024 at 2:22 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I pointed out that everyone interviewed under oath contradicted Hutchinson’s testimony, including the Secret Service agent who drove the vehicle on Jan 6. He had to wait months to speak with the committee to refute her account. Raskin seems defensive, almost as if he was involved.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Yes @RepRaskin everyone interviewed under oath contradicted Hutchinson’s testimony including the driver of the vehicle on Jan 6—a Secret Service agent who had to beg your committee for months for an interview so he could refute her sworn account of what happened. Raskin sure sounds defensive here—almost like he was in on it.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

Comrade Jamie Raskin is a pathological liar (which he learned from his dear old dad). Here he says that Cassidy Hutchison “testified flawlessly and beautifully and made no mistakes and no one has accused her of perjury”. Comrade Raskin should be kicked out of congress, disbarred and arrested. He should be nowhere near an investigation of J6 since he was involved.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Robert Shapiro suggested in the Washington Post that President Biden should offer Donald Trump a blanket pardon to allow him to focus on governing rather than seeking revenge. While this idea has merit, it raises questions about its effectiveness. A presidential pardon would only cover federal charges and not Trump's state convictions related to financial misconduct. The discussion also touches on the challenges Trump faces with ongoing prosecutions. Additionally, a Republican report claims Liz Cheney tampered with a witness, but talking to witnesses is not illegal. Cheney merely encouraged testimony, and there is no evidence of any wrongdoing on her part.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ask you about something that appeared in the Washington Post, a newspaper I know you probably subscribe to. It's in your office foyer. Robert Shapiro, who's a political scientist at Columbia University, wrote this week. President Biden ought to offer Donald Trump a blanket pardon. And he said one of the benefits of that would be that it would enable president Trump, and I quote, to devote all of his administration's attention to governing instead of seeking revenge and retribution against his enemies. What do you think about that? Speaker 1: Well, if that would work, then I think there's a credible argument to be made for that. The question is whether that would actually work. I mean, we are, in Speaker 0: And the this person, Robert Spreer, also argues by accepting this pardon, Trump would be accepting some manner of implied guilt. Yeah. Which he said that would be good for history and for the to blunt the revisionist history of January 6th and everything attached to it. Speaker 1: A presidential pardon, would apply only in the federal context. So it would not apply to his existing state criminal conviction for cooking the books and, you know, the various forms of financial misstatements he made as part of, the hush money plot with the porn star mistress. So that would be left intact, for something by this, thinking aloud. It would apply, presumably, to the Jack Smith prosecution. I assume this is what, the article is about, and, of course, the Supreme Court has made it very difficult to pursue that prosecution anyway. So I I don't know. Look. I think that all of these things should be in the table if they can help us get through, the nightmare of all of the threatened prosecutions and persecutions that, president Trump is talking about. I mean, they've been, you know, talking about going after Liz Cheney simply for doing her legislative work in a way that is completely covered by the speech and debate clause. It's not a crime for somebody to go out and find witnesses to a violent insurrection. And One Speaker 0: of your colleagues, a Republican, issued a report this week saying that Liz Cheney tampered with a witness and therefore should be criminally prosecuted. Speaker 1: Yeah. To talk to witnesses is not to tamper with witnesses, and, they've given no specificity in terms of what the witness tampering would consist of. As far as I know, Cassidy Hutchinson testified flawlessly and beautifully and made no mistakes, and, certainly, nobody's accused her of perjury. Nobody has contradicted anything that she said. So how did Liz Cheney, suborn perjury or tamper with a witness? What what did she do? She encouraged her to come forward and tell the truth. There's nothing against the law in that.
TomFitton
Posted - January 6, 2025 at 8:20 PM
Saved - January 7, 2025 at 4:46 PM

@TomFitton - Tom Fitton

FANI WILLIS CONFESSES! Heavy lifting @JudicialWatch and a state court forced Fani Willis to confirm documents exist about her collusion with the partisan Pelosi January 6 Committee to "get @realDonaldTrump." https://t.co/oeVPRLnIj3

Video Transcript AI Summary
Fannie Willis recently revealed she has records of her communications related to the January 6 operation against Trump, following a Judicial Watch lawsuit. Initially, she claimed no such records existed, but a court found her in default for not responding to the lawsuit. Instead of complying with the court's suggestion to release the records, she is attempting to use legal exemptions to withhold them. This situation suggests she was involved in collusion with the Pelosi operation, shows a disregard for the rule of law, and undermines the public's right to know. Legal actions will continue to challenge this.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, Fannie Willis just confessed to having records of her communications with the January 6 Pelosi operation, the Get Trump operation. She only confessed to this yesterday, thanks to a judicial watch lawsuit. Of course, when we first sued and began asking for these records, they told us they had no records. Well, it turns out that wasn't true. In fact, the only reason we got the confession yesterday was because a court last week found her in default. She didn't bother to answer the lawsuit under law as you as she was supposed to. But rather than turn the records over as the court, I think, strongly suggested, she's using a loophole of exemptions and privileges to hide the records from the American people. Now we're gonna push back hard in court. Our head lifting will continue. But in the meantime, this really does confirm a, she was in collusion with the Pelosi operation to get Trump. B, she has no respect for the rule of law. C, she has no respect for your right to know.
DC_Draino
Posted - January 22, 2025 at 6:48 PM
Saved - January 22, 2025 at 9:22 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm curious about Liz Cheney's reaction lately. The J6 investigation has shifted to the Judiciary Committee, giving them subpoena power to gather information from the FBI and DOJ. I'm wondering about the identity of the J6 pipe bomber, the number of FBI informants in the Capitol, and what the J6 Committee may have covered up. We're on the verge of uncovering the truth.

@DC_Draino - DC_Draino

Want to know why Liz Cheney is freaking out right now? The J6 investigation was just moved to the Judiciary Committee so they have subpoena power to get info from the FBI & DOJ Who is the J6 pipe bomber? How many FBI informants were in the Capitol? What did the J6 Cmte cover up? We’re about to find out🔥

@MZHemingway - Mollie

BREAKING: J6 Investigation To Move To Judiciary Committee To Help Republicans Uncover FBI Abuses https://thefederalist.com/?p=340917

BREAKING: J6 Investigation To Move To Judiciary Committee Biden pardoned Cheney, but congressional investigators will continue to uncover what really happened at the 2020 election protest. thefederalist.com
Milajoy
Posted - January 1, 2026 at 5:27 AM
Saved - January 2, 2026 at 4:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
BOMBSHELL: I say the House Judiciary Committee proves Cheney and Thompson fed Smith transcripts, documents, and Meadows’ texts to target Trump. ILLEGAL COLLUSION: they violated House rules in Dec 2022 rush before GOP takeover. PROVEN SETUP—J6 was a Deep State hit job. Lock them up!

@Milajoy - Mila Joy

BOMBSHELL: House Judiciary Committee proves J6 leaders Liz Cheney & Bennie Thompson secretly fed Jack Smith evidence—transcripts, docs, Meadows' texts—to target Trump. ILLEGAL COLLUSION: Violated House rules, abused power in Dec 2022 rush before GOP takeover. PROVEN SETUP — J6 was a Deep State hit job. Lock them up! 🇺🇸

View Full Interactive Feed