TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed
reSee.it AI Summary
Zuckerberg-funded ministry of truth faces scrutiny over video exposing Dan Wilson's lack of understanding in genomics and statistics. Wilson's ignorance extends to Sanger sequencing and DNA calculations. He pressures scientists to remain silent on dsDNA in vaccines, while advocating for selective censorship. Unaccomplished fact-checkers harass those who question vaccine safety, despite growing evidence of contamination and concerns raised by experts. The presence of SV40 sequences and rising cancer rates post-vaccination raise further alarm. Pfizer's hidden sequences and bait-and-switch tactics add to the controversy. The truth must prevail.
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
Another Zuckerberg funded ministry of truth- http://FactCheck.org has questions and their lead source is... You guessed it, a video that demonstrates Dan Wilson can't use a DNA calculator.
FactCheck.org
factcheck.org
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
This shouldn't surprise anyone. Dan is on record not understanding simple high school statistics like Sensitivity and Specificity. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JM9yXSVww_w
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
Dan is also on record not knowing how to read a Sanger Trace. This is genomics 101. Dr Sin Lee tries to patiently teach him that Sanger sequencing never sequences the actual primers used to initiate the Sanger reaction. 🤦♂️🤦♂️ https://newtube.app/user/Fredyatelmstreet13/JsYvtSZ
Not Found
NewTube - An innovative new media platform powered by open source code
newtube.app
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
This is relevant as Dan pesters people like Wafik El-Diery (Director of the Cancer Center at Brown) to remain silent about the dsDNA in the vaccines. Wafik believes science shouldn't censor questions. Dan believes some questions are not allowed. https://x.com/weldeiry/status/1713573720466305280?s=20
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
It's very odd that someone as unaccomplished in this field like Dan is the backbone of http://FactCheck.org, but given they are sending Masters of Arts into the heated debate, Im not surprised they don't understand citation rates of researchers @KateYandell may need help
FactCheck.org
factcheck.org
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
I also find it odd that http://Factcheck.org cares to even ask such questions now as Facebook/IG are already censoring my content deemed to be true. And studies on mRNA being found in Breast Milk (true). Shoot first and ask questions later- FactChoke https://x.com/akittenmonkey/status/1714000265177907238?s=20
FactCheck.org
factcheck.org
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
I've already addressed Dans pipette free video which took him more time to compose than @P_J_Buckhaults took to just measure the DNA. https://x.com/P_J_Buckhaults/status/1692662966095602125?s=20
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
The embarrassing thing for Dan, is that his video shows anyone familiar with PCR that he is clueless on how to calculate DNA molecules from a qPCR reaction. https://x.com/Kevin_McKernan/status/1685295194491482112?s=20
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
And this is no longer a "trust me over Dan" argument. Multiple independent labs have now run the test and are coming to similar conclusions. The vials are consistent in a given lot but vary tremendously between lots on the size of the contamination. The PCR efficiency canard-
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
Dan hallucinated a PCR efficiency of 70% in his video. @DJSpeicher used a pipette and actually measured it. Dan should pick up a pipette. @KateYandell should learn to discern the difference.
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
It is no surprise that leaders in this field are speaking out. What is a surprise is the hoard of unaccomplished fact checkers and unpublished debunkers that harass everyone who even asks questions about this topic. https://x.com/GeneCollector/status/1706682771492499598?s=20
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
And their pestering once eviscerated, naturally ends with Ad homimen arguments.
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
This is a good time to remind the FactChokers that this sequence has a nuclear targeting sequence that reaches the nucleus in hours. https://x.com/idonttrustit/status/1709058548972364231?s=20
@idonttrustit - idonttrustthe$cience™
@Kevin_McKernan https://www.nature.com/articles/3302021
Effect of a DNA nuclear targeting sequence on gene transfer and expression of plasmids in the intact vasculature - Gene Therapy
Although the use of nonviral vectors for gene therapy offers distinct advantages including the lack of significant inflammatory and immune responses, the levels of expression in vivo remain much lower than those obtained with their viral counterparts. One reason for such low expression is that unlike many viruses, plasmids have not evolved mechanisms to target to the nucleus of the nondividing cell. In the absence of mitosis, plasmids are imported into the nucleus in a sequence-specific manner, and we have shown in cultured cells by transfection and microinjection experiments that the SV40 enhancer mediates plasmid nuclear import in all cell types tested (Dean et al., 1999, Exp Cell Res 253: 713–722). To test the effect of this import sequence on gene transfer in the intact animal, we have recently developed an electroporation method for DNA delivery to the intact mesenteric vasculature of the rat. Plasmids expressing luciferase or GFP from the CMV immediate-early promoter/enhancer and either containing or lacking the SV40 enhancer downstream of the reporter gene were transferred to the vasculature by electroporation. When transfected into actively dividing populations of smooth muscle or epithelial cells, the plasmids gave similar levels of expression. By contrast, the presence of the SV40 sequence greatly enhanced gene expression of both reporters in the target tissue. At 2 days post-transfer, plasmids with the SV40 sequence gave 10-fold higher levels of luciferase expression, and at 3 days the difference was over 40-fold. The presence of the SV40 sequence did not simply increase the rate of nuclear import and expression, since expression from the SV40-lacking plasmid did not increase beyond that seen at day 2, the time of maximum expression for either plasmid. In situ hybridization experiments confirmed that the increased gene transfer and expression was indeed due to increased nuclear localization of the delivered SV40 sequence-containing plasmid. Based on these findings, the ability to target DNA to the nucleus can increase gene transfer in vivo and inclusion of the SV40 sequence into plasmids will enhance nonviral gene delivery.
nature.com
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
The Source for why this is a concern is straight from the FDA. https://x.com/Kevin_McKernan/status/1641265846193463296?s=20 This is a must read-
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
H/T Dr. David Wiseman. https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/biologics-research-projects/development-quantitative-assays-evaluate-safety-cell-substrates-and-vaccines
Quantitative Assays: Evaluate Safety of Cell Substrates and Vaccines
A description of Keith Peden's research program and related publications.
fda.gov
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
SV40 doesn't require the Tumor Antigen to cause problems. https://x.com/Kevin_McKernan/status/1686080434038308875?s=20 And papers that model DNA integration find it incredibly efficient. https://x.com/Kevin_McKernan/status/1703905863772029190?s=20
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
2. See @JohnBeaudoinSr work on the death records in Mass. Cancer rates are on the rise post vaccination. Case studies exist on rapid acceleration of some cancers post covid vaccination. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8656165/
Rapid Progression of Angioimmunoblastic T Cell Lymphoma Following BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine Booster Shot: A Case Report
Since nucleoside-modified mRNA vaccines strongly activate T follicular helper cells, it is important to explore the possible impact of approved SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines on neoplasms affecting this cell type. Herein, we report and discuss unexpected rapid ...
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
3. If by nefarious, you mean the SV40 sequences were hidden from regulators and the informed consent process.. yes. Did they intend to do this? I cant know peoples intentions. But their intentions are often signaled in what they buy (cancer companies) https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer-completes-acquisition-trillium-therapeutics
Pfizer Completes Acquisition of Trillium Therapeutics | Pfizer
Acquisition enhances Pfizer’s Oncology portfolio with addition of next-generation, investigational immuno-therapeutics for hematological malignancies Pfizer Inc. (NYSE: PFE) today announced the successful completion of its acquisition of Trillium Therapeutics, a clinical stage immuno-oncology company developing innovative therapies for the treatment of cancer. As Trillium becomes part of Pfizer, it brings an impressive portfolio that includes biologics that are designed to enhance the ability of patients’ innate immune system to detect and destroy cancer cells. Its two lead molecules, TTI-622 and TTI-621, block the signal-regulatory protein α (SIRPα)–CD47 axis, which is emerging as a key immune checkpoint in hematological malignancies. TTI-622 and TTI-621 are novel SIRPα-Fc fusion proteins that are currently in Phase 1b/2 development across several indications, with a focus on hematological malignancies. Both molecules are also being tested to evaluate clinical potential in solid
pfizer.com
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
This SV40 sequence is superfluous. Moderna doesn't have it. Pfizer doesn't need it as it already has an AmpR promoter for the Kan gene. Pfizer hid it. Why?
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
4. More so than ever. Dr. Sin Lee has found it Dr. Philippe Buckhaults has found it Dr. Brittige Konig as found it Dr. David Speicher has found it.
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
5. Provenance of the vials This is the 'Elf on the Shelf' hypothesis. We run RNA integrity assays to discern this. Its a Non issue. And others have sequence vials directly from Pharmacies. Low wattage retort from the low citation peanut gallery. https://anandamide.substack.com/p/kleptoplastic-conniptions
Kleptoplastic Conniptions
The clumsy adoption of other peoples arguments
anandamide.substack.com
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
You can read more about the absurdity of this claim on this thread. https://x.com/Kevin_McKernan/status/1706870174756880700?s=20
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
@ScienceNvrSttld @Jikkyleaks This is the vector map Pfizer disclosed to the EMA. Elf on the Shelf hypothesis requires the Elf knew pfizers exact codon optimization and vector and spiked that into vials in Europe and the US. Despite Pfizer admitting the EMA that this was in all the vials. They left out… https://t.co/HsfH75OVYd
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
The question the Fackcheckers have to ask themselves, how long can they live with themselves propping up a fraud? Pfizer pulled a bait & switch. The vials in the trial are not what was given to the public and you are now an accomplice in a RICO case that will sink you. https://t.co/7r2xfQXaUF
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
Absolutely revolting headline from CNN. The spin The reality https://t.co/DiLd4mja4X
@ggreenwald - Glenn Greenwald
I think sometimes people forget that Media Matters was created, shaped and governed for a long time by David Brock, arguably the single most craven, deceitful and amoral scumbag DC politics has ever seen. There was no way for anything decent to be spawned from that rotted root:
@JackPosobiec - Jack Poso 🇺🇸
BREAKING: Media Matters created accounts and gamed the X server to create false impressions for their article This isn’t journalism, this is a hoax https://t.co/vO1HVDBuEo
@DiedSuddenly_ - DiedSuddenly
Dozens of hit pieces by the Main Stream Media. Not a single one addresses this: https://t.co/c0TRjCPdx6
@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch
Whoops! FOIA request reveals unvaccinated died at lower rates than the vaccinated in New Zealand. Now that we have a control group, will Jeffrey Morris admit he was wrong? Of course not. The data doesn't matter!
reSee.it AI Summary
Since August, there have been more arrivals each month than American births. The exact number of undetected encounters is unknown. Microsoft funded the development of an AI Language Model training tool called ToxiGen, which classifies certain phrases as hate speech. NGOs encouraging illegal immigration may be engaged in a RICO predicate offense, but the FBI hasn't raided their offices. The numbers of apprehensions only represent a fraction of the actual number. There was a minor correction to the first chart, and encounters exceeded births in September 2023. Speculations about my motivations for starting in October 2019 are unfounded; it's simply the available data from CBP.
@fentasyl - ~~datahazard~~
Since August, there are officially more arriving each month than there are children being born to American mothers. And these are just the official encounters -- we don't know how many avoided detection.
@fentasyl - ~~datahazard~~
Did you know: Microsoft funded the development of an AI Language Model training tool called ToxiGen. It classifies phrases like "we should build a wall between the U." as hate speech. ChatGPT & Zuck's Llama2 are 99%-100% in compliance with ToxiGen.
@fentasyl - ~~datahazard~~
>Our ultimate aim is to shift power dynamics, therefore we do not consider the agents of oppression (e.g. whites) Read the Microsoft ToxiGen Paper for yourself: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.09509.pdf The ToxiGen dataset: https://github.com/microsoft/SafeNLP/blob/main/data/toxiGen.json "ImplicitHate" dataset: https://github.com/microsoft/SafeNLP/blob/main/data/implicitHate.json
File not found · microsoft/SafeNLP
Safety Score for Pre-Trained Language Models. Contribute to microsoft/SafeNLP development by creating an account on GitHub.
github.com
File not found · microsoft/SafeNLP
Safety Score for Pre-Trained Language Models. Contribute to microsoft/SafeNLP development by creating an account on GitHub.
github.com
@fentasyl - ~~datahazard~~
Did you know: Encouraging illegal immigration is a RICO predicate offense Countless thousands of people employed at NGOs have been engaging in this activity for decades. You might now be wondering why hasn't the FBI raided a single one of their offices / executives.......
@fentasyl - ~~datahazard~~
Here are the numbers when using only those classified as "Apprehensions" -- this, of course, significantly understates the actual number. These datasets are easily found on government websites. CBP: https://www.cbp.gov/document/stats/nationwide-encounters CDC: https://wonder.cdc.gov/natality.html
Nationwide Encounters
Return to the Public Data Portal
cbp.gov
@fentasyl - ~~datahazard~~
Minor correction to the first chart: It was missing the final month's label. (November, for which we have CBP encounters data but do not have CDC natality data). And the first tweet in this thread is a bit unclear: September 2023 was the first month encounters exceeded births. https://t.co/GKhtebQSQD
@fentasyl - ~~datahazard~~
Lots of conspiracy theorists in the replies speculating about my motivations for beginning in October 2019 (aka the beginning of Fiscal Year 2020) Sorry to disappoint: That's just all the data the CBP has linked directly on their page. https://t.co/VMQ9kE6I1k
@MurfittTauranga - Kirsten Murfitt
Do you think this 2022 "science " supported by the "statistics" from "experts" stacks up in 2024?; https://t.co/JODfqtljTq
@deadlinedom - Dom B
@Likeshesays Wow. Where in hell do you get these ficticious numbers? Jesus you MAGA cultists are hilarious.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Roll down the windows and unlock the doors. Don't roll them up. Open the door knob.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Put the window down, man. Roll the window down. What are you doing? Roll them up. Roll this one down.
Roll that one down too. What? Hey. Don't roll the window up. I'm not sure.
Don't roll the window up. Hey. Okay. Do not roll the window up. Hey.
Unlock the doors now. Door. Unlock the doors now. Door. Unlock the doors now.
Open the doorknob. Open the doorknob. Open the doorknob.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Replacement theory is a conspiracy theory they said. https://t.co/Muu5aUbJqo
Video Transcript AI Summary
Amsterdam, The Hague, and Rotterdam have high migrant populations from non-Christian, non-Western countries. London and Brussels also have a majority of migrants. The speaker believes the great replacement theory is now reality, with native populations being outnumbered. They criticize leaders for celebrating this shift as "diversity" meaning fewer white people. They question why leaders would be happy about their people no longer being the majority in their own country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The capital. Amsterdam currently consists of 56% migrants. The Hague, 58% migrants. Rotterdam, almost 60% migrants. And, of course, most of these immigrants come from non Christian, non Western, African, and Middle Eastern countries.
Conclusion, the Dutch population is already outnumbered in the majority of our cities. But that looks let's look onwards. London, 54% migrants. Again, conclusion, native population outnumbered. Brussels, color me shocked, 70% migrants.
Conclusion, native population majorly outnumbered. And other Europeans will, of course, follow suit soon if they haven't already. So I'm going to draw the forbidden conclusion here. The great replacement theory is no longer a theory. It's reality.
And what's interesting about replacement is that the establishment will either deny its existence or when they admit to it, they say that it's a good thing that the native European population is soon no longer a majority on its own continent. Dutch national disgrace and dubbed climate pope, Van Stimmermans, already stated in 2015 that diversity is humanity's destiny and that Europe will be diverse. And of course, by now, I think we all know what they mean with the words diversity. It means less white people, less of you. Imagine this in an Asian or an African country.
Imagine their leaders rejoicing in the fact that their people will soon no longer be a majority in their own country. Absolutely unthinkable. Unimaginable. So what in the world is wrong with our leaders?
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The stats she rattles off are insane.
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
.@axios is trying to rewrite history by claiming Kamala is not in charge of the border. Not only did they themselves write in 2021 that Kamala is in charge of the border, but it was written by the same author!!! Unfreakingbelievable. @StefWKight https://t.co/Zx8OFvtZLH
@EndWokeness - End Wokeness
The Biden-Harris administration was just forced to admit that they overstated job creation by 818,000 jobs in one year. Not 818 jobs. Not 8,180. Not 80,180. EIGHT HUNDRED THOUSAND. https://t.co/KJv6PM7K0J
Video Transcript AI Summary
The government overstated the amount of people in the workforce, with a revision down 818,000 jobs. Manufacturing was down 115,000 people. This is the largest revision down in 15 years. It shows weakness in the job markets over the past year. Construction is down 45,000.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A huge revision down 818,000 fewer jobs. This is, the basically, the government's overstated the amount of people in the workforce. And even when you look under this, manufacturing was down a 115,000 people. So this is a revision down, a significant revision down, the largest in 15 years that we've seen. And it basically says that the government has now overstated the amount of people who are working in this workforce.
It shows weakness in the job markets, over the past year that we didn't realize was there, but now we know is there. So again, 818,000 overall jobs down, manufacturing down, 115,000, in this. And if you just look, construction down 45,000, so these numbers are huge numbers in revisions down.
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Just look at the numbers!!! https://t.co/FkKid63Br4
Video Transcript AI Summary
Here is a summary of the provided transcript:
The speaker presents economic data from the Federal Reserve, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Energy Information Agency, and Nasdaq to compare economic performance under the Trump and Biden-Harris administrations.
Key metrics include: Inflation rate year over year (1.89% under Trump, 5.28% under Biden-Harris), cumulative inflation (7.8% higher under Trump, 19.2% higher under Biden-Harris), average gas price (down 5.4% under Trump, up 46.6% under Biden-Harris), 30-year mortgage rates (down 34.8% under Trump, up 132% under Biden-Harris), average rent costs (up 11.8% under Trump, up 21.6% under Biden-Harris), NASDAQ Composite (up 138.2% under Trump, up 39.4% under Biden-Harris), grocery prices (up 6.5% under Trump, up 20.9% under Biden-Harris), electricity prices (up 4.2% under Trump, up 29.6% under Biden-Harris), and real hourly wages (up 6.8% under Trump, down 2.2% under Biden-Harris).
The speaker suggests these numbers, based on data as of July 12, 2024, can help viewers decide who was the "better CEO" without relying on emotion. The speaker claims Harris would be more liberal and cost everyone more money.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why didn't they talk about what's really important to all of us? Do me a favor and take a breath. Don't scroll. Watch the numbers I'm gonna give you. A lot of you on the left are arguing about emotion.
A lot of you on the right are arguing that it's about, hey, 4 years ago, this, that, and the other. Let's get real numbers that you you can now sink your teeth into. If you're on the left, you're gonna find out exactly what Harris Biden have done. If you're on the right, you're gonna find out exactly what Trump did. This is not a chart I made up.
This is an actual chart put together based on the Federal Reserve, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Energy Information Agency, and the Nasdaq. These are real numbers that you can sink your teeth into, that you could take to work and show them at the water cooler, that you can have after dinner if there's an argument about politics. Let's just take the emotion out and talk about numbers. The inflation rate year over year under Trump, 1.89 percent. Under Biden Harris, 5.28%.
Inflation cumulative, 7.8% higher under Trump, 19.2% higher under Biden Harris. Average gas price under Trump down 5.4% to $2.49 average, up 46.6% under Biden Harris, $3.50 average. 30 year mortgage rates down 34.8% under Trump, 3.86% average, up a 132% under Biden Harris, 5.45% average if you can get a mortgage. Average rent costs up 11.8% under Trump, up 21.6% under Biden Harris. NASDAQ Composite was up a 138.2% under Trump, up 39.4% under Biden Harris.
Grocery prices up 6.5% under Trump, up 20.9% under Biden Harris. Electricity prices were up 4.2% under Trump, up almost 30% at 29.6 under Biden Harris. And real hourly wages, a big indicator, up almost 7% under Trump, 6.8%, down 2.2% under Biden Harris. These are real numbers that I didn't make up. These are numbers you can go and research and verify.
These are numbers that are based on July 12, 2024. The jobs numbers, of course, got worse since then with a readjustment down by about a 1000000 jobs. Now get emotional if you want and complain about somebody's hair, how they tweet, or whatever, or their age, or you can actually look at numbers and decide who was the better CEO. Who was the better person in charge? Because Harris is no different than Biden except she's a little more progressive, more liberal on policies which will cost everybody even more money should she win.
Any questions on this, make sure that you post them right here. Make Make sure you share this and I appreciate you staying till the end of the video. It's important that we have real knowledge and that's what I just gave you. Come on.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
And to think they didn't even fact-checked her once... They think people are stupid. https://t.co/O89F2x3rME
@Timcast - Tim Pool
So the FBI put out false data, the White house patted themselves on the back and it was A FUCKING LIE https://t.co/Z5M79GW2bm
@RepNancyMace - Rep. Nancy Mace
Let me explain to you how this works, Mr. Science. You counting illegal aliens in the census is conveniently skewing the population count for Left House districts. Stop playing dumb. https://t.co/4FH4cqnpPA
Video Transcript AI Summary
You mentioned uncertainty about the political implications of congressional apportionment and the inclusion of undocumented individuals.
I clarify that my role is scientific, not political, and we conduct our counts according to the Constitution.
Yes, when determining congressional seats, the population count includes undocumented individuals. This inclusion can indeed impact political campaigns, especially when drawing district lines and influencing voter representation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You just said you didn't know if there are political implications for congressional apportionment in the electoral college and you're counting illegals.
Speaker 1: In all honesty, I am not a politician. I'm a scientist. And so we do we do our accounts according
Speaker 0: to the constitution. Mister Science.
Speaker 1: Sure. Yes, ma'am.
Speaker 0: When you're doing apportionment, we're doing congressional seats based on population that includes illegal illegal aliens. Does that have a political impact in campaigns when you're when you're drawing those lines and and and having people vote in those elections?
Speaker 1: They are counted in apportionment. Yes.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
How can the data systems be so bad?
@MarkJCarneyEgo - Mark Carney's AlterEgo
The Polls are fake. Liberals are manipulating them. Here’s the proof through deep dive research: https://t.co/DvSjLhqDng
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker alleges that recent polls showing a surge in Liberal support are manipulated. They focus on several polling firms, starting with Liaison, noting it began polling shortly after Mark Carney's leadership selection. Corporate documents reveal Alex Nanoff is involved, and his past website shows he worked as a political assistant for a Liberal MPP. Another individual connected to Liaison, Raymond Edwards, is a chief of equity and inclusion officer and was director general for Corporation Canada.
The speaker then examines Main Street, highlighting a small sample size in their polls. Quito Maggi, associated with Main Street, has a history of helping candidates win campaigns. The speaker references a Twitter dispute between pollsters, including Nick Kovaslis from Campaign Research, who claims his polls show the Conservatives ahead, contrary to other polls. The speaker suggests Frank Graves from EKOS Research is biased against Pierre Poilievre. Despite Nick's past Liberal support, his current tweets express support for Pierre Poilievre. The speaker concludes that the polls are manipulated due to the alleged biases and conflicts of interest of the pollsters.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I'm back, and this video is going to hit everyone hard. It'll be good for some of yous, and some of yous are probably gonna hate me for it. But you read this right. Liberals under pressure and manipulating the poll. Let's dig into what I found and want to share with everybody, which is public available information, TikTok, because we know what they pulled on me the last couple of days.
So let's get started. Now everybody has seen these polls by now, and if you haven't, you're probably living under a rock. Every liberal is spreading this around and using it as firepower, and every conservative is like, this can't be fucking right. Well, conservatives, I'm here to show you the facts, and liberals, you're gonna hate me for this because I discovered stuff that's probably gonna make you think that I am just spreading misinformation, but a little bit of research gives you the answers. So if look at this, they just shot right up, like, right to the fucking moon in a very short period of time.
The guy haven't even got on his bus and got to many cities, and he's already shooting to the moon. And as you can see, it's all red, except for Nanos. But we're gonna focus on all of these ones that have really shot this up to the moon. And Iquaz is part of this too. I just forgot to highlight it.
Just thought about that now. Now when you type in Liaison, for all you guys who tried to correct me on that word, I don't care. I'm from a French family. So when it comes to Liaison, they started March 15, and they didn't have any polls before that. Conveniently, a few days after Mark Carney, won the leadership.
Sorry. Correction. Got selected for the leadership. So I did pay for the corporate documents, which are publicly available. $8.
I got it. And we know it's Alex Nanoff. So from my other video on Instagram, somebody gave me a tip. Somebody who knows Alex gave me a tip. So I researched that information and brought me to here, the local, Toronto news.
And I gave it a little read, read a little bit about who he was. But when I got down to hear it said Nandoff's website, I'm like, great. Let's go check it out. Then I was all, fuck. The website's not there anymore.
But then I remembered the way back machine. I was like, fuck yeah. One of those bipolar moments within seconds. So I put the website address in there, and sure enough, between 2022 and 2023, there was some activity. And boom.
Got his old website that's no longer active. So I took a look through it. Found out the part of Toronto that he is working out of. Found a cheerful picture of him. That's Alex right there.
Then I noticed something. This name right here, Amanda Samard. As you can see, he said, after studying French at the University of Ottawa, I had the opportunity to work at various levels of government, notably as a political assistant at the federal level, then at Queen's Park as an exact executive assistant to Amanda Samar, former MPP for the Glengarry Prescott Russell. And who is she? A liberal.
So thank you, Alex. We now know you support the liberals. You got a biased poll. Just direct it right off of that. We know you've worked with them, and we know you support them.
So 100 a Liberal supporter. Let's move on. Now back to the corporate documents that I showed you that he is part of. There's another corporation that is a part of this. This is just a small corporation under the bigger one.
So I spent another $8 and I got a new name. Raymond Edwards. Oh, who's this? And yes, Alex signed that one too, so they're connected. So I found mister Ray Edwards on LinkedIn.
Sure enough, he is an associate assistant deputy ministry and chief of equity and inclusion officer. I guess he wanted to be included in these polls. And when you scroll through his experience, during the time they started this corporation, he was director general for Corporation Canada during 2018 and 2021. Not a conflict of interest at all. So with all that being said, supposedly, they are the most accurate polling firm in Ontario.
Yeah, bud. Okay. Let's move. Now we got Main Street. The exact same time, the same time that all these other people are pounding out these polls when the Liberals started winning.
Same time. Let's go check out who Main Street is. So when you click on their information, it brings you to their polls. And as you can see, it was only done on 1,657 people. So everybody who thinks these polls are so accurate, that's a small amount of people, and they use demographics to target.
This one was by text message. Who are they text messaging? People that signed up to their polling system or people that are signed up to liberals or people that are signed up to conservatives. Who knows where they got these numbers from? But that's how they did this one.
So I do got these corporate documents as well, another $8, but I could've just went on the website and found out who it was to begin with. And his name is Quito Maggi. Hopefully, I said that right. And if you see underneath there, it says during this period of time, Quito became a trusted advisory manager for municipal, provincial, and federal campaigns. In these roles, Quito implemented the analytical techniques he learned in the investment industry to help candidates win.
His candidates win. So we already know he's got a biased information as well. There is a there is a party that he likes, and we're gonna get to that in a second. And this is lovely Cueto right here. Such a dark photo.
It just looks like a head on a black screen. Barely see a suit, but let's get go. Now here's where things get messed up. This is where the fight starts. And when I say fight, all these pollsters right now are fighting on Twitter.
By the end of this show, you're not gonna believe any poll that is put up. I I just I'd advise you to just not look at the polls ever again and just know who's gonna win from here on in. So I was reading through it, and I've seen here, Ponyboy and Soda Pop are claiming a 20 shift in Ontario for the Canadian poll in less than two weeks. And then there's this tweet, with another guy. I'll show you in a minute.
I literally just got out of a field of 3,000 completed surveys, three thousand twenty five minutes surveys. I have CPC ahead of the LPC, not check Frank's post again, not 22 points behind. And this is this guy that said it, real Nick, Kovaslis. Sorry if I said that wrong, buddy. But if you read these guys, you're gonna see the fight go on.
Then there's some more here I said when I said, voice of Frankie, that's another research, we'll get to him in a minute, that the LPC was not 22 points ahead and the CPC in Ontario. I literally had the CPC ahead by two points. He deleted his findings in his tweet. Then at the bottom of the tweet says, I get paid no matter what. The polls actually say, unlike you who gets paid when you sell subscriptions.
Close race. Now there's a reason why I believe this guy, and you'll see in a minute. Now this is Frank Graves, the founder of EKOS Research, and he's retweeting CBC fact check and looking into Pierre Pauliev's investments. So we already know that he's all about sharing stuff that's gonna hurt Pierre Polyev, but let's continue. And just remember, a lot of this stuff is just allegedly, but, you can kinda make it out for yourself and go read all these conversations and connect the dots.
But this is Nick, the one you're gonna wanna listen to, from Campaign Research. And Nick was one of the Canada's First cloud computing fully virtual at home call center businesses, which he just merged and then joined Campaign Research and now owns it. But what I wanted to point out was Nick was on the premier Clarks BC Liberal campaign team, involved with focus groups that informed the campaign messaging and strategy. He was a Liberal supporter too, like all of the rest of them, but not anymore, and I will show you. So this is the other company he owns, campaign support.
You can pause to read. And they specialize in polling and research. But check out this tweet. It says right here, knock it off versus go f yourself. I hope Pierre keeps it up and f'ing wins this thing, as I always have.
So with all the polls he does and him saying I hope Pierre keeps it up, it's quite obvious. Knowing that he used to support the Liberals and no longer does, and everybody else has been now caught supporting Liberals, it's It's kinda obvious what's going on here. But y'all can go check out these tweets back and forth and fight and go down the rabbit hole, and you'll find out for yourself. Then there's Mario Conceco, which is president of Research Co. Another one.
Look at his experience. He did a lot of writing for newspapers. We already know all about them type of people. But this last one, editorial researcher, for the secret of Marrone tapes, which is all about dark secrets of Mar, Mulroney. Hopefully I said that right.
You guys are always hitting me up about how I pronounce stuff. I don't care, I'm French. But the CRIC, the ones that give out the memberships to these pollsters in order for them to submit their their data, you can see that they respond to CTV News article on questionable polls. There's a big alert on it. And Nick is no longer a member all because of his tweets on SocialX.
So he's hinting you. I hope Pierre keeps it up and effing wins this thing. His polls are saying different than other people's polls. So don't believe this bullcrap. Come on.
This is totally manipulated polls. It doesn't change that quick in two weeks. You literally can't make this shit up. This doesn't go like this in two weeks. It doesn't do this.
Mark Carney's not some superhero. Okay? He's leading the same team that screwed everybody over the past nine years. Simple. Just a new hat on the head.
So what do you think? Liberals under pressure? Are they manipulating the polls? Let me know what you think in the comments.
@mistergusano - Gusano
Conservatives will see this and come up with the biggest cope ever witnessed in human history. MAGA is a clown show. https://t.co/IJnaLsA4xD
@jnottah - Hatton, America is back
"FACTS" the left does not want to hear 👇 https://t.co/n4tP5zLOjy
Video Transcript AI Summary
Nobody hates you for being a "transformer," but for forcing your delusions on others. People aren't judging you for your skin color, but for doing ignorant things and blaming racism when facing consequences. Nobody cares that you're gay, but they dislike you making your sexuality your entire personality and pushing it on others. Identity politics have brainwashed you into thinking any negative reaction is bigotry, but that's false. The problem isn't who you are, but how you act. Your victimhood prevents you from accepting this because changing is harder than claiming discrimination.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't know who needs to hear this, but nobody hates you because you're a transformer. Yes. You're a fucking weirdo, but that's your business. The problem is that you try and force everyone else to participate in your delusions and adopt your mental illness as their own. Similarly, nobody is judging you because of the color of your skin.
They judge you because you do ignorant shit and cry racism as soon as you find out that your actions have consequences. By the same token, nobody cares that you're gay. Hell, they wouldn't even know if you kept it to yourself and didn't act like a fruitcake, but you made your sexual preference your whole personality and then shoved it down everyone's throat. That's why people don't like you. I know identity politics have brainwashed you into believing that any blowback to your behavior is bigotry, but that's bullshit.
The issue isn't who you are. The issue is how you are. Your victimhood just won't allow you to accept that because that would mean that you have to change. And that's much harder than being the little loser who cried discrimination.
@mazemoore - MAZE
Fauci was wrong or lying about everything.https://t.co/pHg5XsLB5z
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes criticism of them is an attack on science. They stated vaccinated people don't need to worry about serious illness or transmission, but later acknowledged fully vaccinated people can transmit the infection.
Masks were described as working "at the margins, maybe ten percent." School closures were considered an appropriate approach initially, but remote learning may have "forever damaged" kids, though the speaker doesn't believe it's "irreparably damaged anyone."
The speaker claims they didn't recommend lockdowns, but recommended shutting the country down to the president, knowing it would have serious economic consequences.
The speaker suggests the virus originated from the animal-human interface in wet markets, but that the place of origin was not within the market itself. Another intelligence arm concluded COVID began with a lab leak in China. The speaker denies the NIH funded gain of function research in the Wuhan Institute, while others claim NIH funded research that made a bat coronavirus more contagious. The speaker denies that this is gain of function.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But they're really criticizing science because I represent science.
Speaker 1: If you're vaccinated, you really don't need to worry about getting it in a way that's serious or transmitting.
Speaker 0: That is true. That is correct, Chris. It'll lead to protect you completely against infection, and the chances are very likely that you'll not be able to transmit it to other people. The risk is extremely low of transmitting it to anybody else. Full stock vaccinated people are clearly capable of transmitting the infection.
When you're in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better. If people are not wearing masks, then maybe we should be mandating it. I often myself wear two masks.
Speaker 2: And I'm quoting you now. At the population level, masks work at the margins maybe ten percent. To hear that they only work at the margins maybe ten percent would make a lot of people ask, okay. Then why was I wearing a mask?
Speaker 0: You're really attacking not only doctor Anthony Fauci, you're attacking science when you say that this is gonna go away tomorrow like magic when you know that there's no chance it's gonna just disappear. We hope this just goes away, burns itself out.
Speaker 3: So my question is why weren't you straight with the American people about this to begin with?
Speaker 0: So the bottom line is it's a guesstimate. I gave a range.
Speaker 3: It seemed in that quote to suggest that you were basing your your recommendation on polling and what people could accept. Is that not what you meant?
Speaker 0: No. I mean, it's it's a bit of that.
Speaker 2: We're seeing all of these school closures around the country. Is that the right move for children and families?
Speaker 0: Yeah. No. And I think what's going on right now is is generally an appropriate approach. You wanna start doing something to socially distance yourself. How dramatic that is, closing schools and doing other things should be proportionate.
And it went too far that particularly for kids who who couldn't go to school except remotely, that it's forever damaged them. Well, I don't think it's forever irreparably damaged anyone.
Speaker 4: The US Surgeon General has called it an urgent public health crisis, a devastating decline in the mental health of kids across the country. According to the CDC, the rates of suicide, self harm, anxiety and depression are up among adolescents.
Speaker 0: And the record will show, Neil, that we didn't recommend shutting everything down. First of all, I didn't recommend locking anything down. I recommended to the president that we shut the country down. And that was very difficult decision because I knew it would have serious economic consequence, which it did. Yeah.
Because if you look at the people that are politicizing me, there's somebody that all the way over on one level. But there are a lot of other people who look upon me the way they should as a nonpolitical person that I am. They're not doing it because they say they don't wanna do it. They're Republicans. They don't like to be told what to do.
Right. And we gotta break that. But now is the time to do what you're told. Where did this virus come from, do you think, today? Did it come from a lab?
Was it man made? When you have the animal human interface and you have animals that come out of the wild that are sold at these open, what they call them, wet market.
Speaker 2: Place of origin was not within the market itself. No. I don't think you could say that.
Speaker 5: There's a report today that another intelligence arm of the US government, this is inside our energy department, has joined the FBI in concluding that COVID began with a lab leak in China.
Speaker 0: That the NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain of function research in the Wuhan Institute.
Speaker 6: We now know that a bat coronavirus was enhanced in the lab. The National Institutes of Health acknowledged that it funded research of a virus that was studied at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The experiment unexpectedly, we're told, made a bat coronavirus more contagious than the original naturally occurring one.
Speaker 1: Take an animal virus you increase the transibility to humans. Right. You're saying that's not gain of function? Yeah.
Speaker 0: That is correct. And and senator Paul, you do not know what you are talking about, quite frankly. And I wanna say that officially. You do not know what you are talking about.
Speaker 1: They took animal viruses that only occur in animals and they increased their transmissibility to humans. How you can say that is not gain of function?
Speaker 0: It is not. What we're talking about now is the gain of function research in studies that increase predominantly the transmissibility as well as pathogenesis and alteration of host range of the virus. But he's lying here, senator. It is you. I'd have to laugh at that.
I should be prosecuted.
@kurtcaz1 - Kurt Caz
They’re lying about the numbers https://t.co/t1yoxWQAXs
Video Transcript AI Summary
Guys, this is Paris in 2025. They're lying about the numbers. This is the new France. Coming soon. Coming soon to you, to a neighborhood near you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Guys, this is Paris in 2025. They're lying about the numbers. This is the new France. Coming soon. Coming soon to you, to a neighborhood near you.
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
Remember last year when they revised job numbers and found that 818,000 jobs "created" under Biden didn't exist? Well, they just revised the numbers again and found that another 911,000 jobs didn't exist. Democrats lie about literally everything. https://t.co/ICKIh1iISf
@davidicke - David Icke
How about some research before jumping to convenient conclusions? Do we want the truth, or the 'truth' that suits the narrative? https://t.co/kzUZY2cSHn
Video Transcript AI Summary
They want us to believe that it was the left that was responsible: 'They want us to believe that it was the left that was responsible.' We're supposed to believe that 'this guy shot Kirk, then took the rifle apart, put it in the knapsack, jumped down, and hurry away.' We're told he hid it 'in a wood in a reassembled state' and then 'tells his his mate on a text where he's admitting everything in the official story.' And so what you need to do before you start jumping to conclusions, HFF. There may be elements in which that is the case, but 'who's orchestrating it?' Let's do some freaking research, and let's find out what really happened. People have killed him. They want civil war between left and right.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They want us to believe that it was the left that was responsible. And we're supposed to believe that this guy shot Kirk, then took the rifle apart, put it in the knapsack, jumped down, and hurry away. We're then told he hid it in a wood in a reassembled state and then tells his his mate on a text where he's admitting everything in the official story. And so what you need to do before you start jumping to conclusions, HFF. There may be elements in which that is the case, but who's orchestrating it?
Let's do some freaking research, and let's find out what really happened. Instead of jumping to conclusions immediately People have killed him. Which are the conclusions they want us to have. Why? And we'll get into this now.
They want civil war between left and right. But what you have to do is you have to go here, and you have to go to that level that is working through both left and right.
@MYLUNCHBREAK_ - MY LUNCH BREAK
The World Population chart exposes something massive... if it's even true to begin with. Nobody was here 300 years ago. https://t.co/31CYTOSBiU
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that mathematically the worldwide population in the last 1,400 years was basically zero, contrasting this with mainstream history which claims people were building palaces, castles, and cathedrals at the same time. He begins at Rimes Cathedral in France, dated to 1211 (eight hundred and thirteen years ago), and notes that in the USA similar cathedrals are dated to the 1800s, while in Europe dates are accepted without question. He questions the claim that this cathedral was part of a long, perfected tradition, pointing out that the cathedral supposedly followed an earlier church destroyed by fire a year before construction began, and he questions how eighty years of construction would be feasible without modern tools, power, or shipping.
He identifies the designer as Jean Day Orbeis and traces similar claims to other churches like Saint Pierre Saint Paul, built between the end of the twelfth century and early thirteenth century. He asserts that there were “basically no people” in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, yet mainstream history says these structures were built then. He emphasizes the “fire narrative” among more than 100 buildings and argues the math does not support such populations or timelines. He cites a 1835 population of 1,000 for the location and contrasts it with England’s population rising from about 9,000,000 in 1801 to over 56,000,000 in the last two centuries, claiming a worldwide decline rate of 83.92% in the same period, which he says should cast doubt on the claimed populations and dates.
He goes on to dissect Spain’s population from Worldometer data, suggesting the worldwide population would be 3,000,000 or less in certain earlier years under a model of a 66.1765% decline every sixty-nine years. He presents a string of calculated population figures—1748 with 106,000,000; 1679 with 35,000,000; 1610 with 11,800,000; 1541 with 3,900,000; and 1200 with 17,700 worldwide—arguing that such numbers imply that civilizations with no modern tools could have built cathedrals and other monumental structures. He claims this challenges the idea that thirteenth-century people built vast cathedrals with advanced capabilities.
The discussion moves to an ancient cathedral in Athens, Greece, photographed in 1860, noting that worldwide population then was just over 300,000,000—far from today’s 8,000,000,000. He zooms in on the Acropolis front, highlighting “incredible” details and a logo of Tartarian origin (a griffin) visible on buildings, including in prior episodes. He connects the Greek site to the idea of an advanced civilization (Mu/Tartaria) and references the Hill of Mu and the word Mu in Greek myth.
He critiques scaffolding and restoration practices as propaganda that keeps the perception of our civilization as more advanced than past ones, arguing that such modern interventions imply the opposite. He presents a side-by-side comparison to suggest that current buildings are dwarfed by ancient structures. He reiterates the core conclusion: with a math-based deduction, the worldwide population would have been extremely small in the past, implying a potential reset of population around 1776, with serious implications for accepted historical narratives.
Speaker 0 closes by noting that the population math—down to possibly three people in one of the years—supports the claim that there was little to no global population in early periods, and that this math has been waiting to be recognized, inviting viewers to delve deeper.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, we are gonna show mathematically that the population worldwide in the last one thousand four hundred years was basically zero. When the mainstream history tells us that at the exact same time period where basically nobody was here, they were building palaces, castles, and cathedrals. And before we expose the population lie today, we have to get an understanding of how this all works from the bottom up. Welcome to Rimes, France, where we hold one of the most incredible structures in the world, and it's under investigation today. The Rimes Cathedral, where we are being told that the construction of this cathedral started in the year 1211, where this is eight hundred and thirteen years ago.
Now in The USA, they can tell us that these type of cathedrals were built in the eighteen hundreds. So they're at least trying to fit this type of construction into this mainstream timeline that we're given today. But when we go over to Europe, they just don't seem to care one bit. They throw dates around, and everyone just accepted it for years. Could you imagine that next week, any city in the world tells us that one of these are gonna be thrown together?
I think the world would be shocked. Yet, when we are told that this was built eight hundred and thirteen years ago, in the year 1211, we all just said, yeah. That sounds like a good year until now because we have patterns to look for, especially when a building holds the fire narrative, where we have found over a 100 buildings to this point that hold a fire narrative, which is no longer mathematically possible. And this one's gonna be added to the group when we are told that this cathedral in France wasn't even the first one. They had an even earlier church that was destroyed by a fire a year before construction began on this new one.
And this one lasts forever. So they knocked this thing out in eighty years when, let's be honest, if we didn't have a power tool or a car or shipping company or any architectural training processes today, do any of us actually believe that our civilization would just knock this thing out in eighty years? Realistically, I'd love to know in the comments below how long you think this building would take today. I'm interested to see what you all think, especially because we're being told that this building was built over eight hundred years ago. The fact that we can see these buildings all over the world, they're still here.
It's not like I'm talking about something that's a hidden mystery. We can all go there and look at it and then compare it to the buildings that we produce today, which is supposedly over eight hundred years of evolving and advancing, and it's not even close. So let's think about this for a second. We are supposed to believe that they had construction down, and it was perfect since the beginning of time. Yet nothing else advanced.
Only construction. Building palaces was the only thing the 12 hundreds were good for apparently. The problem is is that the buildings are the only thing that are left from the December, which is exactly why they're forced to make these dates up in order to try to explain them into our fabricated timeline, whereas a car or a watch, a phone, a plane, and a helicopter, they've all been here before as well. They just aren't built into the ground all over the world for all of us to see when the buildings are. We are told that the designer of this cathedral was Jean Day Orbeis.
And who exactly was this master designer? Starting at Point Gutter, making his debut for the France national historians. Gene constructed the abbey church or did he find it? Where they tell us that the abbey was found at the end of the seventh century. And don't worry.
They had construction down, of course. Still there in the town center today. When they go on to say 600 later, Jean debuts building the Saint Pierre Saint Paul Church, where it was built between the end of the twelfth century and early thirteenth century. And we have all of this documented, of course. No.
Today, we are going to show that there were mathematically, basically no people here in the twelfth and the thirteenth century, a time that the mainstream history likes to tell us was knocking out palaces. So they were just throwing dates around, telling us that they constructed the Saint Paul Church between the end of the twelfth and beginning of the thirteenth century from eight hundred years ago, and we were all just nodding in acceptance for two hundred years with zero documentation proving this. This is all based on trust, and this group that we're supposed to be trusting has proven to be pretty shady where they tell us that the architecture is superb, particularly the facade with its two towers, the choir with ambulatory with five radiating chapels. Interesting. And telling us that in 1835 that the population of this location was only 1,000 people.
And the population of England since eighteen o one, the exact timeline that we're talking about here worldwide from the beginning point of this fabricated mainstream timeline, beginning around 1776, was at around 9,000,000 people. It has grown to over 56,000,000 in just the last two hundred and twenty years. So if we do the math on this, the population is decreasing at a rate of 83.92% in just the last two hundred and twenty years. And this fact alone should get everyone thinking. This stat shows that in the year 1141, the time period that they're talking about here, According to the math, based on data that they're providing, the population of England would sit at 37,898 people in the entire country having only 37,000 people in the year 1141 and knocking out palaces is not mathematically probable at all.
You would think that there would be a single argument that goes the mainstream history's way. You would think that if their tales were true, this type of stuff would not happen. Yet every single time you go deeper, there is yet another flaw. The worldwide population mathematically was basically zero based on everything that we know and have seen. In my opinion, I believe that anything before 1776 is basically fabricated and an attempt to fit into this timeline that we are all in.
And this is when we take it a step further and we go to Spain. And according to the worldometers.info, Spain's population sits at roughly 47,000,000 people, growing around 18,000,000 people in the last sixty nine years. This drop off of people is so dramatic worldwide that in my opinion proves that the beginning of our timeline, our batch of people was simply not that long ago. This is according to their math, their numbers that anyone in the world can go look at. These people of the '12 13 were supposedly also without shipping companies.
They were without power tools, no light bulbs, and suffering. Again, they give us these stories of the past and tell us that there were events. They tell us all of these things where the population was this and that. But at the end of the day, we are not 100% sure that these stories from the thirteen hundreds are true. So the only math we can go off of is what we are provided from when we are actually here and documenting it.
And now we can do the same thing with the worldwide population where the population is decreasing at a rate of 66.1765% every sixty nine years. The rate of the population worldwide should not be increasing or decreasing by 66%. This is obviously showing that there's something going on at this rate. 1886 would have realistically only had 928,000,000 people, and 1817 worldwide would mathematically already have been down to 314,000,000 people. And this is information that is provided to us sitting right here in front of our faces where they, in my opinion, were just waiting for us to find this.
At this point, I think this is a game to this group to see who can figure this out. All of this information is all here provided with clues. All we have to do is simply look. The math doesn't lie. The worldwide population would mathematically drop down to only a 106,000,000 people in 1748.
In 1679, according to this math, there were only 35,000,000 people here. Worldwide, the population in 1610 would have only been 11,800,000. 3,900,000 people in 1541. And if we bring it all the way back to the year twelve hundred, eight hundred years ago, the exact same year that the mainstream history is telling us all about, like they were there and saw it happening themselves. They saw those 12 hundreds and 13 hundreds people just smacking those stones right into place, and they're there forever.
They are telling us that it was built at the end, not the beginning, but at the end of the twelfth century at this rate. Every sixty nine years, decreasing by 66% overall. Nobody is even here. Only 17,700 people worldwide, and this is all based on basic math and numbers that are provided to us. And if this is true, this completely disproves these stories, these tales that people in the thirteenth century were building massive cathedrals.
It basically puts an end to all historical narratives suggesting that a population of basically nobody, more specifically 17,000 people worldwide, were as advanced or more advanced than we are today in terms of construction, construction that we can still see today, yet being primitive, wearing knight outfits, and fighting with swords, having zero power tools, no light bulbs, riding around on horses, and not having a single truck to ship millions of pounds of stone, no form of communication other than using their local raven to send messages to far lands, having provided zero factual evidence that they were ever even transporting stones and zero mention of any training processes ever, leaving this part of the story out every single time or ever explaining how these shipping routes were all figured out. Where is the evidence that we need to show that their stories are true? Where is it? That civilization of nobody with nothing had the capabilities to construct castles, cathedrals, basilicas, and the rest. No.
Once you actually stop and think about it for two seconds, it simply doesn't add up. The 12 hundreds riding by feathers and sleeping in huts, suffering in winters, yet knocking out massive cathedrals, faster and in most cases, better than we do today. And they last for thousands of years, and they survive floods, hurricanes, and the rest. And their population was mathematically proven to be basically nobody. This tale that we are told is nonsense at this point.
Now that we all have an understanding that the worldwide population, the math, is on our side, that this is not probable. Let's continue to our bonus today. An ancient cathedral located in Athens, Greece, a photo that was taken in 1860, a hundred and sixty four years ago, where we have shown that the worldwide population was just over 300,000,000, nowhere near the 8,000,000,000 mark that we are told that we have today, a cathedral that was sitting on dirt. We're gonna zoom in on this thing and find something incredible. The detail on the front of this building is unbelievable.
We know that Tartaria's flag was a griffin. We've seen this logo on buildings all over the world, which we have even seen in episode 40 when we went to Wisconsin. As we get closer to the front of this building in Greece, we have a logo of the previous civilization. And, again, these photos were taken in the eighteen hundreds in a collection by Nicholas Katzenpulas, and here we have the Acropolis in Athens, Greece. And I was just looking at this area on Google Earth where there is another hill next to the Acropolis.
I saw these stairs on the side of this hill, and it's weird because they won't let you drop the view down on them and get a closer look at them. It seems to me like this grass and dirt is covering a much larger structure that we can't see with the stairs being exposed on the side. It looks like it's been melted, and they've just built on top of it. It's very strange. So here at the top, that's where these stairs are.
And down here at the bottom is the Acropolis. So you can see how close they are to each other. And before we even look at the mainstream narrative surrounding it, it should just show anyone in a split second that this site was clearly constructed by an advanced civilization. We have detailed columns all over the place. We have some sort of stage here, and we have a mainstream story that should be a lot of fun for us today.
And now that we have unlocked the advanced civilization of Mew in episode sixty and sixty one that I think a lot of us enjoyed, we understand where these buildings and people most likely originated from, where Lemuria holds the name Mew inside of it, putting it right in our faces. The Hill Of Mew, where Mu is also right in the name, meaning a type of goddess in Greek mythology, another connection to Mu. It's very interesting. And before we go on with this mainstream narrative, I have to point this out. We all understand that these scaffolding that they have here for decades are put here to make us believe that our civilization is somehow helping the ancient structure survive, repairing it, when we all know be the site to to going we're site problem.
That the civilization is giving going this place an upgrade, making our civilization think that we are more advanced and that it needs our help when it doesn't need our help at all. When we construct our buildings like this and then you have the previous civilizations work towering over it, we are not evolving, and we are not advancing. We have a side by side comparison right here. Now that we have a solid understanding of this area and what it looks like a little bit, let's all take this thing up a notch and have some fun. We know that the population mathematically was basically nothing in the 12.
We've calculated it to around 17,700 people worldwide. Now could you imagine the six hundreds based on the math and the data that we've been given at a decreasing population rate of 66.17% every sixty nine years, where we saw that there would have only been 11,800,000 people in 1610 and seventeen thousand people in the year November. Well, I did the math. And based on the numbers that they have provided us and based on a 66.1765% population decrease rate per sixty nine years in the year June, the population worldwide would have been three people. Meaning, that either the beginning of human existence was in or around the year June based on math, or something massive happened and reset the population very recent.
Either way, something massive is going on here that's just been uncovered, especially when the mainstream history tells us that the Acropolis Of Athens, Greece was constructed on a massive hill around the year negative 1300 to negative 1200, which we know the population worldwide would have been zero even if the population hasn't always decreased at 66%. The simple fact is is that going back in time, the population decreases. This is proven through the data that they provided us. The population in negative 1,300, however you wanna go about it, would have been zero if you are going off the mainstream story. Their data.
You can say that there were plagues. You can say that there were these stories when we know that these stories have massive flaws at this point. Anything provided hundreds of years ago can easily be picked apart. We have done this hundreds of times at this point based on facts, things that we can prove, things that we have here right in front of us, data, it proves to me that we aren't wrong. The population data was always a massive key for us, a key that proves that there was a previous civilization here before us, and something massive happened in this place that we all live right around the year 1776 worldwide.
This information, this data, that three people were here worldwide in the year June. This math, it's been here. It's always been here. It's just been waiting for us to see it. And now that we all do, we can all go much, much deeper.