TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

@CDCgov - CDC

Pregnant? You may discuss #COVID19 vaccines with your doctor, but it’s not required before vaccination. While studies have not yet been done, experts believe mRNA vaccines like COVID-19 vaccines are unlikely to pose a risk for #pregnant people. More: https://bit.ly/2WWh9hT.

Bitly | Page Not Found | 404 bit.ly

@CDCgov - CDC

If you are pregnant or are planning for pregnancy, make sure you are up to date with your #COVID19 vaccines, including your booster. Growing evidence shows that COVID-19 vaccination before and during pregnancy is safe and effective. Learn more: https://bit.ly/2WWh9hT.

Bitly | Page Not Found | 404 bit.ly

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Thread: Injecting a LNP and mRNA into Pregnant Women If there is one rule that the medical establishment is supposed to follow, it’s to protect pregnant women & their children by taking an conservative approach when recommending medicines, especially novel experimental medicines

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Nonetheless every single institution tasked with protecting this extra vulnerable group, publicly made policy statements recommending the covid injections for that extremely important subset of society.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The CDC says its find and dandy: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/recommendations/pregnancy.htm

Page Not Found | CDC Page Not Found | CDC cdc.gov

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The American Colloege of Obstetricians and Gynecologists made it even simpler for you to understand: https://www.acog.org/womens-health/faqs/coronavirus-covid-19-pregnancy-and-breastfeeding

COVID-19, Pregnancy, Childbirth, and Breastfeeding: Answers From Ob-Gyns Pregnant and postpartum women have a higher risk for more severe illness from COVID-19 than nonpregnant women. Read the latest information from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. acog.org

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

I was surprised the NHS actually acknowledged biology to be honest but they are certainly gung-ho about the vax. The NHS in the U.K.: https://www.nhs.uk/pregnancy/keeping-well/pregnancy-breastfeeding-fertility-and-coronavirus-covid-19-vaccination/

Pregnancy, breastfeeding, fertility and COVID-19 vaccination Find out about the COVID-19 vaccination if you're pregnant, breastfeeding or might get pregnant in the future. nhs.uk

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine were even kind enough to give you 5 extremely scientific reasons to inject you and your baby: https://www.smfm.org/covidfamily

404: Page or Resource Not Found | SMFM.org - The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine The SMFM is a Society of physicians and scientists who are dedicated to the optimization of pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. smfm.org

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

And finally the Academy of Breast Feeding Medicine, they stop short of an explicit recommendation but downplay the risks and cite a dubious understanding of the scientific evidence related to risk, essentially all of these institutions follow the same tune.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

https://www.bfmed.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=162:abm-statement-considerations-for-covid-19-vaccination-in-lactation&catid=20:site-content

ABM Statement: Considerations for COVID-19 Vaccination in Lactation bfmed.org

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Here is what they say as if it is the gospel: “The vaccine is made of lipid nanoparticles that contain mRNA for the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein; the mRNA sequence only encodes this protein.”

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

“These particles are injected into muscle, where the nanoparticles are taken up by muscle cells. These muscle cells then transcribe the mRNA to produce spike protein. The spike protein made by the cell stimulates an immune response,protecting the individual from COVID-19 illness”

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Well then I guess its settled then, we might as well plunge a novel technology that hasn’t even been tested, into thousands of pregnant women’s arms because we want to protect them from a virus with an IFR of .23% in adults and a virtually 0% IFR for babies.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

It’s taken up by the muscle? This is a trope that all regulatory agencies have used to dismiss concerns that the LNP travels to other parts of the body. So does it just get taken up by the muscle?

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

According to this study from 2015, no it makes it’s way through the placenta and can induce trophoblast apoptosis. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0143400415300679?via%3Dihub

Nanoparticles can cross mouse placenta and induce trophoblast apoptosis The effects of nanoparticles on pregnancy remain unclear. In this study, we investigate whether nanoparticles of a specific size can cross the placent… sciencedirect.com

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Trophoblast - a layer of tissue on the outside of a mammalian blastula, supplying the embryo with nourishment and later forming the major part of the placenta.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Apoptosis - the death of cells which occurs as a normal and controlled part of an organism's growth or development.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

In case you didn’t surmise Trophoblast Apoptosis isn’t a good thing.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

“Our findings suggest that nanoparticles can cross the placenta and be taken up by fetal organs. Certain concentrations of carboxylate-modified polystyrene nanoparticles may be cytotoxic to trophoblasts, which could alter placental function.”

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

They continue: “Nanoparticles of different chemical natures, different sizes, and different quantities that transfer across the placenta and enter fetal circulation are well regulated by mechanisms such as simple diffusion, active transport, phagocytosis, and endocytosis [15].”

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

“The human placenta cellular barrier at the maternal–fetal interface are formed by trophoblast and endothelial cells.”

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

In Conclusion: “In the present study, we demonstrated that carboxylate-modified nanoparticles ranging from 20 to 500 nm in size can cross mouse placenta and be distributed in various fetal organs.”

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

I know what you are thinking, “but we are dealing with a specific nanoparticle a “lipid nanoparticle” to be exact, so it may not cross cross various cellular barriers”. I wish that was the case but it is not.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

As you can see in the schematic below its designed explicitly designed to bypass these barriers. A Schematic Representation of Extra-and Intracellular Barriers for mRNA Delivery

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

If you are interested in learning more about the history of LNP and mRNA development this paper is a great resource. https://www.cell.com/molecular-therapy-family/molecular-therapy/fulltext/S1525-0016(19)30053-X?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS152500161930053X%3Fshowall%3Dtrue

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

As I mentioned the lipid nanoparticle is designed specifically to penetrate the blood brain barrier, you know that barrier that protects the brain form environment hazards, pathogens, bacteria, viruses and medicines.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

It was initially designed to be used in gene therapies and as a way to deliver chemotherapy for brain tumors. (Shankar et al., 2018) https://www.eurekaselect.com/article/91033

Lipid Nanoparticles: A Novel Approach for Brain Targeting Background: Brain is a delicate organ, separated from general circulation and is characterized by the presence of relatively impermeable Blood Brain Barri eurekaselect.com

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Studies have proven that ENMs (engineered nanomaterials) that can cross or bypass the blood–brain barrier and then access the central nervous system, carry the potential of neurotoxicity (Ge De, 2019) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6559249/

The neurotoxicity induced by engineered nanomaterials Engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) have been widely used in various fields due to their novel physicochemical properties. However, the use of ENMs has led to an increased exposure in humans, and the safety of ENMs has attracted much attention. It is universally ... ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The authors also state that Engineered Nano-materials can also cause various types of DNA damage.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

These types of evaluation were never done in the Pfizer safety and efficacy trials, not just for pregnant women, but for everyone.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

At the very least, if they were, we are not privy to the results and they weren’t included in the safety studies provided to FDA used as a basis for granting the Emergency Use Authorization.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Therefore, it is impossible to know whether the vaccine is safe in this in this regard. Pfizer did not prove the safety of the nano-lipid delivery system for the brain, nervous system, other organs and pregnant women. Let that sink in.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

We were told ad nauseum that the injection would stay at the injection site. Why is that when it was known since the inception of lipid nanoparticle delivery systems that they enter the systemic circulation and can find their way to many end points.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

In the following picture you are looking at a lengthwise section of a mouse that was sacrificed in order to understand the bio-distribution of LNP’s.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The whitest areas represent the highest concentrations of the excipient and LNP at 1 hour, 48hours, and 168 hours. I am not sure where the injection sites was on these mice but I am pretty sure the LNP didn’t stay at that site. This was known in 2014.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Here is a screenshot of their conclusion in this study to add further understanding.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Link to the paper: (Christensen et. al 2014) https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Piet-Swart-3/publication/259587258_Biodistribution_and_Metabolism_Studies_of_LNP-formulated_Internally_3H-labeled_siRNA_in_Mice/links/556f07d408aec226830a4d5e/Biodistribution-and-Metabolism-Studies-of-LNP-formulated-Internally-3H-labeled-siRNA-in-Mice.pdf?origin=publication_detail

ResearchGate - Temporarily Unavailable researchgate.net

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

This is how studies are supposed to be conducted, understanding bio-distribution and the kinetics of the LNP and its payload is of utmost importance. Especially if you intend on putting said substance into everyone on earth’s body.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

So here is the question, if Moderna, Pfizer, Regulators,Academics, Medical establishment and everyone else responsible for foisting this onto the world, knew LNPs and their subsequent payload, the mRNA can reach all the systems of the body and cross the blood brain barrier,..

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

..why are they continually insisting it cannot? It is inconceivable that these institutions and the research scientists they employ were not aware of the studies referenced here.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

So why are they telling us without reservation that its safe for everyone on earth, including pregnant woman and even brand new little babies? Why indeed.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

If you’ve found this informative, please consider giving me a follow to keep up with future threads 🧵. Thank You.

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

New stinky cheese 🧀🧀🧀 Don't you just love the @UKHSA? Not only have they delayed publishing #pregnancy data after June 2022 in the latest vaccine surveillance report but they are gaslighting you about the #stillbirth rates. Here's the chart: @1979pop @ClareCraigPath

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

Here are the figures No doses of vaccine in pregnancy = 3.76 per 1000 One+ dose in pregnancy = 3.3 per 100 95% confidence intervals do not cross. A significant increase then, right? Wrong...

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

There was another piece of information missing which was buried further in the report. Minority groups had a 25% lower uptake of vaccination Why is that important?

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

The overall stillbirth rate in 2019 was 3.35 per 1000 - about the same as the "vaccinated" group. But the stillbirth rate for black and "Asian" (UK terminology for Pakistani-Indian ethnic groups) was 5-7 per 100,000 https://www.bbc.com/news/health-58912528

Stillbirth rate high for black and Asian babies in UK The figures come despite improving numbers overall, with some 610 fewer stillbirths in 2019 than in 2013. bbc.com

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

These groups were over-represented in the "unvaccinated" stillbirth rate and under-represented in the "vaccinated" stillbirth rate. Stillbirth rates for white ethnicity groups was 3.22 per 100,000 - 3 points lower

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

So, because the "vaccinated" groups had a much higher proportion of the "low stillbirth rate" ethnic groups (by 25%), that is enough of a confounder to account for the all the difference (0.46 per 100,000) between the groups. Src: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1134076/vaccine-surveillance-report-week-5-2023.pdf

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

Notably the report has also stopped publishing data for births - presumably because the drop in births is so dramatic between before and after the vaccine rollout. A significant 13% drop (p=0.004, i.e. the probability that this is a chance finding is 4 in 1000)@ichudov

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

This table has not been updated since October 2022 - 4 months ago Why? Why can we not access the raw data behind this report? And why did you not update this table to October 2022? Something to hide? @ONS @SarahCaul_ONS

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

The @ONS and @UKHSA has deliberately obfuscated and conflated data. They refuse to allow you access to all the data that you paid for and instead allow conflicted authors like @Vnafilyan and @KamleshKhunti to publish unverifiable papers using your data.

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

Here's the question: If your vaccine is so good, why are you not allowing the public access to the data that is behind the reports? The govt tell us "if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear" Well, it's your turn @UKHSA. Hand it over. https://www.openrightsgroup.org/blog/responding-to-nothing-to-hide-nothing-to-fear/

Responding to “Nothing to hide, Nothing to fear” This powerful sentence does many things: It encourages a complete trust in state powers – that you will never face wrongful suspicion or misuse of powers, for only the guilty are affected by mass surveillance. openrightsgroup.org

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

POLL: for those who have got through to the end of this thread Should a public inquiry into the role of the ONS and UKHSA in the selective publishing of COVID data be instituted, with criminal prosecution for #malfeasance for any wrongdoing uncovered?

@FoxNews - Fox News

COVID vaccines and boosters shown to protect pregnant women and newborns: ‘Transferred protection’

COVID vaccines and boosters shown to protect pregnant women and newborns: ‘Transferred protection’ Getting a COVID vaccine or booster while pregnant can benefit both the mother and the baby, a new study has found. Dr. Marc Siegel shared his views with Fox News Digital. foxnews.com

@P_McCulloughMD - Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH™

Thorp et al demonstrated a multi-fold increased risk of fetal loss with COVID-19 vaccination. This coincides with an increased risk of maternal death as well. About 65% of mother took the vaccine before or during pregnancy in 2021-2022.

@BusyDrT - Dr Sherri Tenpenny

WOW! What could have possibly caused this devastating spike in miscarriages??? https://openvaers.com/covid-data/reproductive-health

Reproductive Health - OpenVAERS openvaers.com

@kallmemeg - Meaghan Kall

Pregnant women 🤰🏽🤰🏻🤰🏿🤰🏾🤰🏼 Listen to my brilliant colleague Nurin and book your COVID-19 vaccination today. It is very safe for you and baby, and much safer than COVID-19 infection (the negative replies are misinformed and come from general antivax propaganda)

@UKHSA - UK Health Security Agency

If you're pregnant, it's important to protect yourself and your baby this winter by getting your #COVID19 vaccine. 🤰 Book now and get winter strong. 📅 Speak to your GP or midwife, or you can book online or via the NHS App: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/covid-19/covid-19-vaccination/getting-a-covid-19-vaccine/

Getting a COVID-19 vaccine Find out if you’re eligible to get a seasonal COVID-19 vaccination and how to get it. nhs.uk

@3Luser - 3Luser 🌸

@kallmemeg "It is very safe for you and baby, and much safer than COVID-19 infection" But what are the chances of catching a Convid infection and having a problem with it in the first place. You've failed your risk assessment.

@AnwaltUlbrich - Tobias Ulbrich

I won't soon forget the crime against pregnant women and the endless suffering. @rosenbusch_ had posted the link from mdr (a German public broadcasting department of the first public Television in Germany)I won't soon forget the crime against pregnant women and the endless suffering. https://mdr.de/wissen/corona-impfung-schwangere-frauen-wann-schutz-fuer-kinder-100.htm The misery caused by this reporting makes my face flush with anger. Please, dear mdr - paragraph 14 of the press code requires you to read the available material in its entirety and to evaluate it, not to use it as advertising propaganda. I will only try to briefly outline what is missing and it is by no means everything. 1. PSUR#3 from BioNTech Out of 130 women observed who were vaccinated by BioNTech within the first trimester of pregnancy, there were 14 abortions and one stillborn child at birth and another 14 children with congenital anomalies. That is 25 percent of the pregnant women observed! In a group of pregnant women in which the third of the pregnancy in which the vaccination took place was not recorded, BioNTech found that out of 617 women, 25 women had a termination of pregnancy and 2 stillbirths at the time of birth and 10 babies were born with anomalies. That is 6 percent. Even with the data from Table 69 of the PSUR#3, there cannot and should not be a vaccination recommendation in the case of the identified risk of harm. 2. package insert from BioNTech for the Omicron vaccination page 2: "Pregnancy and breastfeeding" If you are pregnant or think you may be pregnant, tell your doctor, healthcare professional or pharmacist before receiving this vaccine. No data are yet available on the use of Comirnaty Omicron XBB.1.5 during pregnancy." There is an increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis as well as heavy menstrual bleeding. 3. breastfeeding mothers transfer modRNA to their babies while breastfeeding. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36156636/ 4 BioNTech and Pfizer discontinued the studies with vaccinations in pregnant women because they were too shocking. Therefore, BioNTech was never able to deliver the safety reports for pregnant women. 5. A summarized scientific study on the effects of BNT162b2 in pregnancy and on menstruation. https://jpands.org/vol28no1/thorp.pdf 6. lipid nanoparticles and ModRNA enter the placenta. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36597546/ 7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36789893/ 8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21342124/ 9. apoptosis (programmed cell death) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26526105/ 10. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33523869/ 11. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22052087/ 12. One of the most shocking documents is this one, which shows what they did to the women in the study and why the study was stopped. https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/125742_S2_M1_pllr-cumulative-review.pdf?ref=VFOX 13. https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M5_5351_c4591001-interim-mth6-protocol.pdf?ref=VFOX 14. Archive of clinical studies on BNT162b2 https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/history/NCT04754594?V_21=View#StudyPageTop 15. What happens to the newborns if the mothers have been vaccinated. A study on this: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2810937 So now everyone can judge the balance of the article. A society that accepts such reporting without reaction is no longer mine. #crime #pregnantwomen #vaccination #placenta #fetus #miscarriage #deadbirth #vaccinedamage #sideeffects 8:38 pm. - Nov. 14, 2023 -

Seite nicht gefunden | MDR.DE mdr.de

Detection of Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Human Breast Milk - PubMed Detection of Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Human Breast Milk pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Lipid Nanoparticle Composition Drives mRNA Delivery to the Placenta - PubMed Ionizable lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) have gained attention as mRNA delivery platforms for vaccination against COVID-19 and for protein replacement therapies. LNPs enhance mRNA stability, circulation time, cellular uptake, and preferential delivery to specific tissues compared to mRNA with no carrier … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Ionizable Lipid Nanoparticles for In Vivo mRNA Delivery to the Placenta during Pregnancy - PubMed Ionizable lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are the most clinically advanced nonviral platform for mRNA delivery. While they have been explored for applications including vaccines and gene editing, LNPs have not been investigated for placental insufficiency during pregnancy. Placental insufficiency is caus … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Nanoparticulate drug delivery in pregnancy: placental passage and fetal exposure - PubMed During the past decade there has been an explosion in the number of nanoparticulate drugs or drug delivery systems being explored, developed and marketed for the treatment and prevention of human diseases. While the potential dangers of drug administration in pregnancy are well known, there are circ … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Nanoparticles can cross mouse placenta and induce trophoblast apoptosis - PubMed Our findings suggest that nanoparticles can cross the placenta and be taken up by fetal organs. Certain concentrations of carboxylate-modified polystyrene nanoparticles may be cytotoxic to trophoblasts, which could alter placental function. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Ionizable lipid nanoparticles for in utero mRNA delivery - PubMed Clinical advances enable the prenatal diagnosis of genetic diseases that are candidates for gene and enzyme therapies such as messenger RNA (mRNA)-mediated protein replacement. Prenatal mRNA therapies can treat disease before the onset of irreversible pathology with high therapeutic efficacy and saf … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Transport of nanoparticles through the placental barrier - PubMed Nanoparticles (NP) are organic or inorganic substances, the size of which ranges from 1 to 100 nm, and they possess specific properties which are different from those of the bulk materials in the macroscopic scale. In a recent decade, NP were widely applied in biomedicine as potential probes for ima … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@rosenbusch_ - henning rosenbusch

***** ***** ***** ***** ********** ******** ******* ******. ****. https://www.mdr.de/wissen/corona-impfung-schwangere-frauen-wann-schutz-fuer-kinder-100.html t.me/Rosenbusch

Nestschutz: Nur Corona-Impfungen während der Schwangerschaft helfen Babys | MDR.DE Wie schützen Eltern ihre Kinder nach der Geburt am besten vor der Gefahr durch Corona? Daten aus Singapur zeigen: Es kommt auf den Zeitpunkt an, an dem sich werdende Mütter gegen Covid-19 impfen lassen. mdr.de

@factcheckdotorg - FactCheck.org

A new study adds to the evidence that COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy is safe for babies, contrary to social media and online claims. For more 👇https://bit.ly/3MK3gOq

Bitly | Page Not Found | 404 bit.ly

@ichudov - Igor Chudov 🐭

A new study shows how COVID vaccines, given to mothers, harm their newborns. Premature births, NICU admissions, and fetal abnormalities listed. Moderna (higher dose vaccine) is the worst! https://www.igor-chudov.com/p/covid-vaccines-harm-newborns-study

COVID Vaccines Harm Newborns, Study Proves Moderna Causes More Fetal Damage than Pfizer due to Higher Dose igor-chudov.com

@ichudov - Igor Chudov 🐭

Moderna (a higher dose vaccine), when given to pregnant women, leads to a 42% higher chance of miscarriage compared to lower-dose Pfizer. Probability that it is a random fluke finding is less than 0.00001. Read here: 👇 https://www.igor-chudov.com/p/cdc-data-moderna-causes-42-more-miscarriages

CDC Data: Moderna Causes 42% MORE Miscarriages Compared to Pfizer Is there a DOSE-RESPONSE Relationship? igor-chudov.com

@ichudov - Igor Chudov 🐭

Moderna (a higher-dose vaccine), given to pregnant women, DOUBLES the chances of infant death, compared to the lower-dose Pfizer vaccine. Read here: 👇 https://www.igor-chudov.com/p/moderna-doubles-the-chance-of-infant

Moderna DOUBLES the Chance of Infant Death, Compared to Pfizer Another Slide from CDC Presentation Shows Statistically Significant Difference igor-chudov.com

@ichudov - Igor Chudov 🐭

That the higher-dose treatment increases chances of adverse outcomes (miscarriage and infant death) means that there is a dose-response relationship, typical for poisons. Pfizer is also bad for pregnancy - but Moderna is even worse.

@robinmonotti - Robin Monotti

"WHITE LUNG SYNDROME" IS A COVID19 "VACCINE" ADVERSE REACTION: "Fully Vaccinated Mother’s Dying Newborn With White Lungs. A pattern of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Neonates" “We have a dying infant with MIS-N, born to a vaccinated mother who never had any symptoms of Covid, and no positive test, and yet the doctors are blaming Covid!” Newborn diagnosed with Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Neonates, MIS-N The paediatrician states that this is a pattern he is seeing in his practice and has lost 4 out of 5 babies born with this condition. He states that the common pattern is; •No signs of Covid infection in vaccinated mothers •High “anti-Spike” (S1) antibody counts in babies •Uneventful pregnancy, up to the point when the baby is born, revealing dysfunctional lungs, infant unable to breathe on their own, and the newborn ends up being hooked up to the highest throughput ventilator."

@robinmonotti - Robin Monotti

Vaccinated Mother's Dying Newborn with "White Lungs" 'No signs of Covid infection in vaccinated mothers High “anti-Spike” (S1) antibody counts in babies Uneventful pregnancy, up to the point when the baby is born, revealing dysfunctional lungs, infant unable to breathe on their own, and the newborn ends up being hooked up to the highest throughput ventilator. Mind you, the anti-spike antibodies are produced not only by a Covid infection but also by the Covid vaccine! And the specific mother was vaccinated! The doctor, helpfully, shows the infant’s test result for spike antibodies:" https://www.igor-chudov.com/p/vaccinated-mother-dying-newborn-with

Vaccinated Mother's Dying Newborn with "White Lungs" Baffled Doctor blames "Asymptomatic Covid" -- which was never diagnosed! igor-chudov.com

@WHO - World Health Organization (WHO)

If you are pregnant, make sure you get vaccinated against #COVID19. It is recommended in every pregnancy. https://bit.ly/30ao4Gl

Bitly | Page Not Found | 404 bit.ly

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

There are currently two RSV vaccines that are FDA approved, Arexvy which is GlaxoSmithKline's and Abrysvo, Pfizer's. Both are approved in adults 60 years of age and older and Abrysvo is the only one approved in pregnant women between 32 and 36 weeks of pregnancy.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Pfizer’s product is the only one approved for use in pregnant women, a significant advantage over rival GSK. This bears out in the recent sales numbers announced by the company: “On a Tuesday conference call, as the drugmaker reported fourth-quarter Abrysvo sales of $515 million, Pfizer execs shared muted enthusiasm for the recent progress the company has made with its rollout.” So as you can see Pfizer has picked up the slack from the plummeting demand for its COVID injections and managed to be first to the maternal market, a huge competitive advantage. https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/pfizer-reports-abrysvo-sales-515m-q4-more-evidence-strong-launch-rsv-vaccine

After 'bad launch' remark by CEO, Pfizer's RSV vaccine gains traction in Q4. How will it fare in latest round of GSK showdown? Pfizer’s Abrysvo generated worldwide sales of $515 million in Q4, with the company laying out plans for how it can increase market share. fiercepharma.com

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Pfizer's market advantage was gained with controversy though. Glaxosmithkiline was in the midst of their phase III trial for maternal use and all of sudden of February 28th, 2022 GSK voluntarily halted the trial due to what they termed an unexplained increased risk of preterm birth and neonatal death. https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/gsk-halts-trial-respiratory-virus-vaccine-pregnant-women-2022-02-28/

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Both GSK and Pfizer’s products are recombinant RSV F protein vaccines and had plans to inoculate pregnant women in order to theoretically protect their soon to be born babies against RSV. Keep in mind that these so called vaccines for RSV are not designed to prevent infection, only to prevent “severe infection”. So the baby or elderly adult who gets the shot still can catch the virus and experience symptoms.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Here are the numbers that prompted GSK to halt the trial. The GSK trial showed In the vaccine arm, 6.81% of births were preterm (95% confidence interval 5.99% to 7.69%) compared with 4.95% (3.97% to 6.07%) in the placebo arm. For neonatal deaths, the percentage was 0.37% (0.20% to 0.64%) in the vaccine versus 0.17% (0.04% to 0.50%) in the placebo arm. GSK FDA Sponsor Briefing Document: https://www.fda.gov/media/165621/download#page=42

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

As mentioned Pfizer's maternal version of the vaccine, called Abrysvo, was recently approved for maternal use and elder use in the US and the European Union, but is not yet authorized in the UK. Here is their commercial for the maternal version. Oddly this was the only version I could find on YT. They probably pulled it because it’s creepy af.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The FDA approved it with conditions though, only allowing women who are 32-36 weeks pregnant ti receive it. Saying: “Available data are insufficient to establish or exclude a causal relationship between preterm birth and Abrysvo… To avoid the potential risk of preterm birth with use of Abrysvo before 32 weeks of gestation, administer Abrysvo as indicated in pregnant individuals at 32 through 36 weeks gestational age.” In Pfizer’s Phase III trial there was an imbalance in preterm births with: 5.7% (4.9% to 6.5%) in the vaccine versus 4.7% (4.1% to 5.5%) in the placebo arm. They called this “not statistically significant”. Package Insert: https://www.fda.gov/media/168889/download

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The GSK and Pfizer products are almost identical products and this caused some ethicists and researchers concerns about whether Pfizer should have informed all women participating in its trial about the potential risk or updated its consent forms. The BMJ conducted an investigation on this and spoke to Charles Weijer, bioethics professor at Western University in London, Canada who said that informing pregnant women in Pfizer’s trial about GSK’s results would have allowed women who had not yet received the jab to consider whether they still wanted to get it and women who had already received it to seek additional medical advice and follow-up. “Any failure to provide new and potentially important safety information data to trial participants is ethically problematic,” Weijer said. https://www.bmj.com/content/383/bmj.p2620

Concerns over informed consent for pregnant women in Pfizer’s RSV vaccine trial Some experts have criticised Pfizer for not informing pregnant women in its trial of maternal respiratory syncytial virus vaccine that trials of a similar vaccine were halted over a potential risk of preterm birth. Others think that notification would have been premature and caused unnecessary anxiety. Hristio Boytchev reports A debate has broken out over whether Pfizer should have told pregnant women participating in its trial of maternal respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccination that a trial of a similar vaccine was halted over a safety signal around preterm birth, The BMJ can report. Both GSK and Pfizer were developing recombinant RSV F protein vaccines to inoculate pregnant women and protect their babies against RSV, a major cause of infant death globally. GSK halted its phase 3 vaccine trial on 28 February 2022 after a safety signal emerged: a possible increased risk of preterm births and neonatal deaths. In the vaccine arm, 6.81% of births were preterm (95% confidence interval 5.99% to 7.69%) compared with 4.95% (3.97% to 6.07%) in the placebo arm. For neonatal deaths, the percentage was 0.37% (0.20% to 0.64%) in the vaccine versus 0.17% (0.04% to 0.50%) in the placebo arm.12 No clear explanation has been found for the increase in preterm births, and experts think that it might be unrelated to the vaccine. GSK told The BMJ that the imbalance was observed primarily in low and middle income countries and not consistently after a peak in late 2021,3 and that it was still investigating the cause of the preterm births but was no longer developing its vaccine. Pfizer was studying preterm births as an adverse event of special interest in its own phase 3 trial, and a numerical (not statistically significant) imbalance in preterm births has recently emerged in phase 3 data: 5.7% … bmj.com

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The BMJ said that “Some Pfizer trial consent forms seen, contain contradictory statements, both warning of possible "life-threatening" effects of the vaccine on the baby while simultaneously carrying a passage that said only the expectant mother is at risk from adverse effects. (Here is screenshot of a portion of the consent form Pfizer had women sign)

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The BMJ also spoke to Rose Bernabe, professor of research ethics and research integrity at the University of Oslo who said "Considering the gravity of the risk that this irresponsible statement veils, this misleading statement should be a ground for questioning the validity of the consent process." Then why is Pfizer portraying the false sense of security that the fetus or neonate will not be exposed to any risk? Even none other than Paul Offit, professor of pediatrics at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and VRBPAC committee member said in a meeting that Pfizer’s and GSK’s vaccines were “almost identical” and so was concerned by GSK’s results. FDA VRBPAC Meeting Transcript: https://www.fda.gov/media/169361/download

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Pfizer did not disclose in the patient consent forms for its phase III trials that it was studying preterm birth as an “adverse event of special interest”. The consent forms stated: “The risks associated with the study vaccine (RSVpreF or placebo) may be experienced by you, but not your baby, since your baby will not receive the study vaccine or placebo directly.” Here is a screenshot from the consent form I found. Full Consent Form: https://centerforvaccinology.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/PF2001-C3671008_9002-0610_CA_ICF-24Month_24Mar21-.pdf?#page=11

Page Not Found - Canadian Center For Vaccinology centerforvaccinology.ca

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The Consent Form also states: “While you are participating, the study team will tell you right away if new information is learned during the course of the study that could change your mind about continuing in this study.” Except they didn’t tell them about the neonatal death and preterm birth signals. Other than that they pinky swear they will tell you. This appears to be a clear violation of Informed Consent. If you are a woman and pregnant wouldn’t you like to know that the trial you are in may increase the risk of your baby being born prematurely or even dying? Even if the risk is relatively low?

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

“I understand the nature of the study and I understand the potential risks” Considering what we’ve just learned, the question I have to any lawyers out there is, do participants have a case that this violates informed consent or any laws? The other question this begs is that if Pfizer plays fast and loose with its ethics surrounding the most vulnerable among us, what other ethical boundaries are they ok with crossing? I know, I know, that's a rhetorical question because it's clear that they have yet to find any boundaries. Keep your eyes on VAERS in regard to these new "Vaccine" Products. There have already been 128 instances that pregnant women were mistakenly administered the Adult 60+ vaccine and 25 cases where kids under 2 years old received the 60+ vaccine. The CDC issues an emergency notice on this in January. https://emergency.cdc.gov/newsletters/coca/2024/012224.html

Emergency Preparedness and Response Information for the public and health professionals on how to stay safe during public health emergencies. cdc.gov

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Since you’ve made it this far you should probably just give me follow and check out my other stuff while you’re at 👇🏻

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

"These 2 cases demonstrate the ability of the COVID-19 vaccine mRNA to penetrate the fetal-placental barrier and to reach the intrauterine environment." For three years pregnant women have been told this is not a risk. https://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378(24)00063-2/fulltext

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

Alert: A call for the immediate Moratorium on the use of Covid-19 Vaccines in pregnant woman. The Ontology of Covid-19 Vaccine Deception: ACOG, ABOG, and SMFM and the Future of the Human Genome – Are They Playing with Fire? A recent research study published on Jan. 31, 2024 by the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology indicates that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine is not, in fact, localized to the injection site, but rather can spread systematically to the placenta and fetal blood. For context, the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) is a peer-reviewed journal of obstetrics and gynecology. Popularly called the “Gray Journal,” AJOG is considered by most to be the pinnacle of journals in the specialty of Ob/Gyn. Since 1920, AJOG has existed as a continuation of the American Journal of Obstetrics and Diseases of Women and Children, which began publishing in 1868. This most recent research study published by AJOG on Jan. 31, 2024, entitled Transplacental transmission of the COVID-19 vaccine messenger RNA: evidence from placental, maternal and cord blood analyses post vaccination, found that COVID-19 vaccine mRNA was detected in the placentas of two pregnant mothers who had been vaccinated with Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccine shortly before delivery. The study also found that spike protein expression was detected in the placental tissue of the earlier-in-time vaccinated mother, demonstrating bioactivity of the COVID-19 vaccine mRNA after reaching the placenta. https://www.americaoutloud.news/a-call-for-immediate-moratorium-on-the-use-of-covid-19-vaccines-in-pregnant-women/

A call for Immediate Moratorium on the use of COVID-19 Vaccines in pregnant women This most recent research study published by AJOG on Jan. 31, 2024, entitled Transplacental transmission of the COVID-19 vaccine messenger RNA: evidence from placental, maternal and cord blood analyses postvaccination, found that COVID-19 vaccine mRNA was detected in the placentas of two pregnant mothers who had been vaccinated with Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccine shortly before delivery. The implications of these research findings are profound... americaoutloud.news

@ejustin46 - Emmanuel

HOW SARS-COV-2 affects the PLACENTA ? 😰 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10735-024-10228-y

Effects of SARS-COV-2 on molecules involved in vascularization and autophagy in placenta tissues - Journal of Molecular Histology SARS-CoV-2 infection is considered as a multi-organ disease, and several studies highlighted the relevance of the virus infection in the induction of vascu link.springer.com

@ejustin46 - Emmanuel

2) This study examined how SARS-CoV-2 infection affects the placenta, the organ that connects the mother and fetus during pregnancy. The researchers analyzed placenta samples from three groups: women with active COVID-19 at delivery, women previously infected but ... https://t.co/FekacMWujQ

@ejustin46 - Emmanuel

3) ...no longer positive, and uninfected controls. Key findings: - The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein was only detected in placentas of actively infected women. - Proteins that allow the virus to enter cells (ACE2, CD147) were increased in infected groups. https://t.co/lC2CYFwuMe

@ejustin46 - Emmanuel

4) - A growth factor called VEGF was higher in infected placentas, suggesting the virus disrupts normal placental blood vessels. - A marker of autophagy (cell self-cleaning) was elevated in active infection, but decreased after the virus cleared, indicating the placenta ... https://t.co/Ht1IiYPw55

@ejustin46 - Emmanuel

5) ...responds to the infection through this process. These results provide insights into how SARS-CoV-2 can impact the placenta and potentially affect maternal and fetal health during pregnancy.

@ejustin46 - Emmanuel

6) The findings highlight key molecular changes that occur both during active infection and after the virus is cleared. Thanks for reading 🙏 https://t.co/4D3nDaFKyg

@Fynnderella1 - Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella🐭

1/ The mRNA platform must not be a consideration for humans animals or plants! The Lipid Nanoparticles alone are a deal breaker, period! 🧵 https://t.co/l9g35m9Pwf

@Fynnderella1 - Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella🐭

2/ Risk/benefit analysis is key in all medical intervention decisions. https://t.co/bPXkYPaSMz

@Fynnderella1 - Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella🐭

3/ Don’t fall for “safe and effective” without full analysis. https://t.co/o97VOfyBvd

@Fynnderella1 - Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella🐭

4/ Such decisions require informed consent and transparency. This, from the @CDCgov is medical disinformation (yes I’m using their own terms). https://t.co/mEiiH5iNzg

@Fynnderella1 - Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella🐭

5/ They ended the biodistribution studies before Cmax was reached. Nothing peaked yet before study was ended. https://t.co/bmLPwoGr4L

@Fynnderella1 - Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella🐭

6/ They knew back in 2014 that the accumulation increases and continues far beyond their study duration. https://t.co/v7rJlodLdX

@Fynnderella1 - Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella🐭

7/ The very same LNPs in the liver within 15m. https://t.co/fKp2bCm1nf

@Fynnderella1 - Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella🐭

8/ More definitive evidence that the CDC was not honest in their representation of the LBP gene therapy. https://t.co/ExoTMaZFQp

@Fynnderella1 - Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella🐭

9/ the LNP/modmRNA transfer through breast milk, yet as late as 2023 “experts” recommend it during pregnancy! https://t.co/oybIhvQQMM

@Fynnderella1 - Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella🐭

10/ They knew this going back to 2010. https://t.co/ImHuQsCLEM

@Fynnderella1 - Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella🐭

11/ The LNP carriers can reach the trophoblasts on their own and induce apoptosis. https://t.co/ihKTAxsoJJ

@Fynnderella1 - Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella🐭

12/ Just the LNPs alone wreak havoc on the reproductive drive system. Morexreas ns why this platform in healthies is a hard pass! https://t.co/krHxYnGnXJ

@Fynnderella1 - Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella🐭

13/ they knew it wouldn’t stay at the injection site, and even called it a #bodyhack and described it as a “feature”. https://t.co/Z11VeSgkii

@Fynnderella1 - Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella🐭

14/ we know these particles core are the ones used in Pfizer. https://t.co/cipPFc358E

@Fynnderella1 - Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella🐭

15/ where are the tox studies, and teratogenicity, carcinogenicity, genotox studies? https://t.co/VgSKCE8Igp

@Fynnderella1 - Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella🐭

16/ Not for human use, until an #EUA allows more lax regulations to experiment on the once-healthy masses. https://t.co/lR5xlVwbmC

@Fynnderella1 - Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella🐭

17/ and they got away with ignoring their x studies because they classified LNPs as excupients. I even argued with Paul Offit about this distinction, but he is clueless about CMC, and pushed a false narrative. https://t.co/DUkEAb57iJ

@Fynnderella1 - Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella🐭

18/ They cause universal inflammation. So many implications of harm. https://t.co/GLy0NfR5Q8

@Fynnderella1 - Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella🐭

19/ Multiple pathway triggers anyone? https://t.co/xoS3GTaYAc

@Fynnderella1 - Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella🐭

20/ LNPs alone triggering foam cells? What implications do they have on platelet, or blood cell formation? https://t.co/SZfWLsTPWQ

@Fynnderella1 - Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella🐭

21/ the carrier alone modulates clot formation. What could go wrong with this platform? https://t.co/yoYJ68R2yv

@Fynnderella1 - Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella🐭

22/ This platform alters both innate and adaptive immunity! IgG4 makes recipient more prone to constant infection. https://t.co/w2UmUUIp8K

@Fynnderella1 - Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella🐭

23/ Don’t get me started on zeta potential! https://t.co/y3lwPRf4Du

@Fynnderella1 - Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella🐭

24/ When others know it’s dangerous and discontinued development, maybe it should be an indication it may be harmful? https://t.co/L2zb1XB2Wa

@Fynnderella1 - Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella🐭

25/25 Was this a good idea to roll out to the world’s population for an infection that they couldn’t even find enough mortality to properly study necessity of such an intervention? I fear an entire generation plus will feel the consequences of such an irresponsible measure. https://t.co/xuWzbMjTyg

@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”

Study Confirms mRNA Shots Cross the Placenta & Reach the Fetus 💉A new peer-reviewed study shows that Moderna's mRNA vaccine (mRNA-1273) crosses the placenta in just 1 hour, accumulates in fetal organs, makes Spike proteins, and stays in fetal tissues after birth. This is the first in vivo proof that mRNA shots directly impact the fetus. It’s clear: these genetic injections are risky for pregnant women and their babies. The CDC needs to REVOKE its claim that COVID vaccines are “safe” during pregnancy. The long-term effects on unborn babies? We have no idea, but pushing these shots without proper safety data is reckless. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2162253125000435

mRNA-1273 is placenta-permeable and immunogenic in the fetus COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are generally recognized as safe for gestational administration. However, their transplacental pharmacokinetics remains obscure… sciencedirect.com

@MdBreathe - Mary Talley Bowden MD

Pfizer's post-marketing surveillance analysis showed a miscarriage rate of 81%, a 5-fold increase in stillbirths, an 8-fold increase in neonatal deaths, and a 13% incidence of breastfeeding complications in newborns whose mothers received the COVID shots.

@MdBreathe - Mary Talley Bowden MD

Link to article: https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/are-covid-19-vaccines-in-pregnancy-as-safe-and-effective-as-the-medical-industrial-complex-claim-part-i/

Are COVID-19 Vaccines in Pregnancy as Safe and Effective as the Medical Industrial Complex Claim? Part I - Science, Public Health Policy and the Law Introduction: In Part I of this three-part series, we report a retrospective, population-based cohort study assessing rates of adverse events (AEs) in publichealthpolicyjournal.com

@TheTorontoSun - Toronto Sun

COVID vaccine ’strongly recommended’ during pregnancy, Canadian doctors say https://torontosun.com/health/covid-vaccine-strongly-recommended-during-pregnancy-canadian-doctors-say?taid=68378781d433280001d9edb5&utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

COVID vaccine ’strongly recommended’ during pregnancy, Canadian doctors say Canada's gynecologists say COVID-19 vaccination is "strongly recommended" during pregnancy and while breastfeeding. torontosun.com

@ZdenekVrozina - Zdenek Vrozina

Prenatal COVID and Infant Brain Development - New Data, Alarming Trends We begin with a 2025 study from Brazil, the first to directly link cytokines in cord blood with neurodevelopmental delays in toddlers exposed to SARS-CoV-2 in the womb. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41390-025-04192-w

Cord blood cytokines/chemokines linked to delays in toddlers exposed to SARS-CoV-2 prenatally - Pediatric Research Maternal infections are linked to neurodevelopmental impairments, highlighting the need to investigate SARS-CoV-2-induced immune activation. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of maternal infection on neurodevelopment and investigate whether cytokine and chemokine profiles predict delays at 24 months. Conducted in Brazil (January 2021–March 2022), this follow-up study included 18 SARS-CoV-2 positive pregnant women at 35–37 weeks’ gestation, 15 umbilical cord blood samples, and blood samples from 15 children at 6 months and 14 at 24 months. Developmental delay was defined using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition, with scores below 90 in cognitive, communication, or motor domains. At 6 months, 33.3% of infants exhibited cognitive delays, 20% communication delays, and 40% motor delays, increasing to 35.71%, 64.29%, and 57.14% at 24 months, respectively. Elevated interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in cord blood correlated with cognitive delays, while interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-17, and IL-1β were associated with motor delays. Increased C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 and other cytokines were associated with communication delays. Maternal SARS-CoV-2 may impact infant neurodevelopment, as early cytokine elevations correlate with delays, highlighting the importance of early monitoring and interventions to reduce long-term effects. nature.com

@ZdenekVrozina - Zdenek Vrozina

At 24 months of age: 36% showed cognitive delays 64% had language delays (sic) 57% had motor delays And here’s the striking part: these delays were predicted by the cytokine profile in umbilical cord blood.

@ZdenekVrozina - Zdenek Vrozina

Elevated inflammation markers: IFN-γ & TNF-α - cognitive delays IL-6, IL-8, IL-17, IL-1β - motor delays CXCL10 - language delays This is strong evidence for maternal immune activation - a mechanism also seen in autism and schizophrenia research.

@ZdenekVrozina - Zdenek Vrozina

A UCLA study tracked 211 COVID-exposed children. At 28 months, 11% screened positive for autism spectrum disorder - far above the expected 1-2%. Some had activated microglia and neuroinflammatory markers in blood at birth. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2024/12/27/world/science-health/covid-pregnancy-autism-study/

COVID pregnancies may have boosted autism risk, study shows 'There’s something really going on,” pediatric infectious diseases physician Karin Nielsen says. 'We don’t want to alarm the world, but that’s what our data are showing.” japantimes.co.jp

@ZdenekVrozina - Zdenek Vrozina

Then comes the placenta. A Michigan pathology review identified SARS-CoV-2 placentitis even in asymptomatic mothers (2025): fibrin deposition intervillositis trophoblast necrosis confirmed virus in placental tissue Risk: fetal hypoxia, IUGR, stillbirth https://meridian.allenpress.com/aplm/article/doi/10.5858/arpa.2024-0247-RA/506106/SARS-CoV-2-Placentitis-A-Review-of-Pathologic

@ZdenekVrozina - Zdenek Vrozina

Structural brain changes have also been observed. An Italian study found ultrasound abnormalities in 23% of newborns exposed to SARS-CoV-2 in utero - vs. 16% of controls. Most were minor (cysts) - but statistically significant. https://ijponline.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13052-024-01826-3

Cranial ultrasonographic findings in newborns exposed to SARS-CoV-2: a single-centre cross-sectional analysis - Italian Journal of Pediatrics SARS-CoV-2’s potential consequences on the developing brain are still unknown. The aim of this study was to describe cranial ultrasonographic (cUS) findings in a population of newborns exposed to SARS-CoV-2 born at San Marco Hospital in Catania. Two cohort of newborns, one exposed to SARS-CoV-2 both during gestation and at birth and one unexposed, were enrolled in this cross-sectional study conducted according to the STROBE guidelines (Strenghtening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) and underwent cUS. We performed a statistical analysis using the Fisher’s exact test to assess whether significant differences among the two groups existed. we enrolled 139 exposed newborns (62 females, 77 males with median gestational age 38.4 ± 1.9 W and median weight at birth 3142.8 ± 594.4 g) and 139 unexposed newborns (60 females, 79 males with median gestational age 38,9 ± 1.3 W and median weight at birth 3230 ± 336 g). cUS abnormalities were found in 32 exposed patients (23%) and in 23 (16.5%) unexposed patients. A statistically significant difference was found in the incidence of minor intracranial abnormalities (p 0.036) between exposed and unexposed patients and between newborns exposed during pregnancy and unexposed patients (p 0.016). in our experience, the incidence of minor intracranial abnormalities was higher in SARS-COV-2-exposed newborns. Our results must be taken with caution and need further confirmation in larger studies but suggest to consider performing cUS at birth in newborns exposed to SARS-CoV-2 in research contexts. ijponline.biomedcentral.com

@ZdenekVrozina - Zdenek Vrozina

Harvard researchers found the effect is sex-specific. Boys born to SARS-CoV-2 positive mothers had 2× the risk of neurodevelopmental diagnoses at 12 months. Girls showed no such increase. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2802745

@ZdenekVrozina - Zdenek Vrozina

And finally: epigenetics. A Swedish 2025 study showed that even mild maternal COVID-19 alters DNA methylation in the infant’s immune and brain-related genes. Genes involved in neuron signaling, interferon response, and neurodevelopment were affected. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.05.10.25327356v1

DNA methylation changes in infants of mothers with SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy medRxiv - The Preprint Server for Health Sciences medrxiv.org

@ZdenekVrozina - Zdenek Vrozina

In summary: SARS-CoV-2 exposure in utero can leave a long shadow - through neuroinflammation placental dysfunction brain structure changes and epigenetic rewiring The science is clear. The risks are real.

@ZdenekVrozina - Zdenek Vrozina

But this isn’t just a warning. It’s a call to action. Expectant parents deserve clear, science-based information on prenatal COVID risks. No child should suffer lifelong harm from an exposure their mother wasn’t told mattered. We are losing futures before they’re even born.

@ZdenekVrozina - Zdenek Vrozina

After five years of research, dozens of peer-reviewed studies, and signals from across continents…how is it possible that public health remains silent? No warnings. No prenatal screening protocols. No public campaigns. No plan. The children deserved better. And still do. @szupraha @ZdravkoOnline

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

Our new pre-print on COVID-19 vaccine safety in pregnancy is out! Women vaccinated in early pregnancy (weeks 8-13) had a higher-than-expected number of fetal losses: Dose 1 = 3.9 more per 100 women Dose 3 = 1.9 more per 100 women Based on data on >200K pregnancies in Israel 🧵

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

2/ Late pregnancy losses were a *big* part of the signal. Among all women: 1.1% lost their pregnancy after week 24. Compared to: 2.7% of women who received dose 1 in early weeks. 1.8% of women who received dose 3 in early weeks.

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

3/ In fact, most of the excess losses occurred later in pregnancy, including nearly half after week 24. In Israel, abortions after week 24 are rare and must be medically justified and are very rare. This strongly suggests biological, not behavioral, mechanisms are involved.

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

4/ In stark contrast, women vaccinated for influenza in the same weeks (8-13) saw *FEWER* fetal losses than expected, about 5 per 100 women vaccinated. What's the significance of that?

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

5/ Comparing both types of vaccines helps control for bias in who chooses to get vaccinated. For example, if women vaccinate in early pregnancy because they have health problems, the elevated fetal loss risk for COVID-19 vaccines could simply be due to that bias.

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

6/ But people who get vaccinated are usually healthier & more health conscious to begin with. This is called healthy vaccinee bias & can make vaccines look safer than they really are. It's a known – but often ignored -- issue in vaccine safety research based on real-world data.

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

7/ Influenza vaccination during pregnancy showed lower-than-expected fetal losses—likely due to healthy vaccine bias. So it's even more striking that mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in early pregnancy showed higher-than-expected fetal losses—despite healthy vaccinee bias.

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

8/ Our findings don’t prove causation. But they point to a clear safety signal—one that calls for further investigation, especially given the vulnerability of this population.

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

9/ So why hasn’t this been seen before? Most other studies compare vaccinated vs. unvaccinated women during vaccination campaigns. That approach is vulnerable to bias—especially if healthier women are more likely to vaccinate (a.k.a. “healthy vaccinee bias”).

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

10/ Our approach was different. We used detailed medical records to estimate expected fetal loss rates for each vaccinated woman—based on her individual risk factors and pregnancy timing—using data from pre-COVID years.

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

11/ Here is a link to the pre-print: https://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2025.06.18.25329352v1 This was of course a team effort with my amazing co-authors: @RetsefL, @TalPatalon, Sivan Gazit, @TracyBethHoeg, @JosephFraiman and Yaakov Segal.

Observed-to-Expected Fetal Losses Following mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination in Early Pregnancy medRxiv - The Preprint Server for Health Sciences medrxiv.org

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

https://t.co/se1GOqkvtl

@RetsefL - Retsef Levi

BREAKING: Analysis of over 220K pregnancies in Israel during 2016- 2022 found that mRNA COVID-19 vaccination during gestational weeks 8-13 was associated with a higher-than-expected number of eventual fetal losses (miscarriages, abortions & stillbirths)! Pregnant women vaccinated with dose 1 during weeks 8-13 had nearly 3.9 (95% CI: [2.55-5.14]) additional fetal losses above expected per 100 pregnancies. Most of the excess fetal losses occurred after gestational week 20 and nearly half occurred after gestational week 25. In contrast, pregnant women vaccinated for influenza during weeks 8-27 exhibited a consistently lower-than-expected observed number of fetal losses, likely the result of healthy vaccinee bias. Women vaccinated for COVID-19 or influenza prior to pregnancy exhibited according-to-expected or lower-than-expected numbers of fetal losses. The study used innovative observed-to-expected methodology, where data from prior years were leveraged to determine the expected number of fetal losses based on the individual characteristics of the pregnant women who vaccinated and their week of vaccination.

@MaryanneDemasi - Maryanne Demasi, PhD

💥BREAKING: ACIP launches sweeping Covid-19 vaccine review under Retsef Levi Billions of Covid vaccine doses were rolled out on assurances they were safe and effective. Now, ACIP’s new Covid immunisation working group is asking the questions regulators never did. 👇👇 @RetsefL @FLSurgeonGen @TheChiefNerd @newstart_2024 @Jikkyleaks

@MaryanneDemasi - Maryanne Demasi, PhD

MIT professor @RetsefL has been an outspoken voice on the @CDCgov's vaccine advisory committee (ACIP) since @SecKennedy's dramatic overhaul in June. Levi has pressed CDC officials on uncomfortable questions, challenging the narrow surveillance windows used to track harms and insisting that delayed effects could not simply be ruled out. He also raised concerns about the safety of RSV monoclonal antibodies after clinical trials showed a clear imbalance in infant deaths.

@MaryanneDemasi - Maryanne Demasi, PhD

Now, @RetsefL has been appointed chair of the @CDCgov's new Covid-19 vaccine working group, and with today’s release of its Terms of Reference, the scale of his task has come into sharp focus. Under the guidance of Levi and his colleagues, the ACIP working group now has a mandate unlike anything the committee has ever undertaken. For the first time, federal advisers will investigate the unresolved issues that have dogged the vaccines since their rushed rollout in late 2020.

@MaryanneDemasi - Maryanne Demasi, PhD

The new working group, involving @RWMaloneMD, will assess everything from DNA contamination in the products, to the persistence of spike protein & mRNA in the body, from immune class switching following repeated boosting to safety in pregnancy, cardiovascular risks, and long-term disability, the list of questions is as sweeping as it is sensitive. https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/breaking-acip-launches-sweeping-covid

BREAKING: ACIP launches sweeping Covid-19 vaccine review under Retsef Levi Billions of Covid vaccine doses were rolled out on assurances they were safe and effective. Now, ACIP’s new Covid immunisation working group is asking the questions regulators never did. blog.maryannedemasi.com

@MaryanneDemasi - Maryanne Demasi, PhD

The stakes could not be higher. Covid-19 vaccines remain one of the most divisive issues in medicine, and the CDC’s credibility has been battered by accusations of selective data presentation. Only this week, experts accused the agency of obscuring seizure risks from RSV monoclonal antibodies by slicing the data into subgroups that hid a statistically significant signal. https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/exclusive-did-the-cdc-mislead-its

EXCLUSIVE: Did the CDC mislead its advisers on the RSV antibody for babies? CDC assured ACIP the RSV antibody for newborns was safe, but buried in its data was a statistically significant signal — nearly a 4-fold higher risk of seizures shortly after the injection. blog.maryannedemasi.com

@MaryanneDemasi - Maryanne Demasi, PhD

The creation of a Covid-19 working group will be more than bureaucratic housekeeping—it is a test of whether ACIP can restore the public’s trust by confronting uncomfortable truths. How this will play out is uncertain? See my exclusive interview with chair, @RetsefL 👇 https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/breaking-acip-launches-sweeping-covid @VigilantFox

BREAKING: ACIP launches sweeping Covid-19 vaccine review under Retsef Levi Billions of Covid vaccine doses were rolled out on assurances they were safe and effective. Now, ACIP’s new Covid immunisation working group is asking the questions regulators never did. blog.maryannedemasi.com

@MaryanneDemasi - Maryanne Demasi, PhD

Will the new working group gather research & assess long-term harms of the Covid-19 vaccines? @React19org @BrianneDressen

@MaryanneDemasi - Maryanne Demasi, PhD

Are the Covid-19 vaccines safe in pregnancy?

@MaryanneDemasi - Maryanne Demasi, PhD

What will you be seeking to investigate the issue of DNA contamination in the covid-19 injections? @Kevin_McKernan @DJSpeicher @JesslovesMJK @Double_Christ

@MaryanneDemasi - Maryanne Demasi, PhD

Would you consider Covid-19 injections to be "gene therapies" ? @JesslovesMJK @Kevin_McKernan @RWMaloneMD

@MaryanneDemasi - Maryanne Demasi, PhD

For years, critics who raised concerns about DNA contamination, biodistribution, immune imprinting, or reproductive safety were dismissed as “alarmists” and spreaders of “misinformation.” Now, the @CDCgov own advisory body has committed to revisiting each of those questions in detail. See the FULL story and please SUBSCRIBE to my newsletter 👇https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/breaking-acip-launches-sweeping-covid @MdBreathe @DrMakaryFDA @TracyBethHoeg

BREAKING: ACIP launches sweeping Covid-19 vaccine review under Retsef Levi Billions of Covid vaccine doses were rolled out on assurances they were safe and effective. Now, ACIP’s new Covid immunisation working group is asking the questions regulators never did. blog.maryannedemasi.com

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING: First Peer-Reviewed Study Finds Direct Molecular Evidence of mRNA “Vaccine” GENOMIC INTEGRATION In a Stage IV cancer patient, we identified a vaccine-derived Spike gene sequence chimerically fused into chromosome 19 with PERFECT 20/20 base-pair identity — 1-in-a-trillion chance of coincidence. ⬇️ In our sentinel peer-reviewed case report — just published in the International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science — we describe a previously healthy 31-year-old woman who developed rapidly progressive stage IV bladder cancer within 12 months of completing a three-dose Moderna mRNA injection series. Bladder cancer is exceedingly rare in young women, and such aggressive presentations are almost unheard of. To investigate, we performed comprehensive multi-omic profiling, including plasma-derived circulating tumor DNA, whole-blood RNA, and urine exosome proteomics. What we uncovered was striking: ⚠️DIRECT GENOMIC INTEGRATION EVENT: Within circulating tumor DNA, a host–vector chimeric read mapped to chr19:55,482,637–55,482,674 (GRCh38), in cytoband 19q13.42, positioned ~367 kb downstream of the canonical AAVS1 safe harbor and ~158 kb upstream of ZNF580 at the proximal edge of the zinc-finger (ZNF) gene cluster. This sequence aligned with perfect 20/20 bp identity to a segment (bases 5905–5924) within the Spike open reading frame (ORF) coding region (bases 3674–7480) of the Pfizer BNT162b2 DNA plasmid reference (GenBank accession OR134577.1). Although the patient received only Moderna injections, the sequence aligned to Pfizer’s published BNT162b2 plasmid reference because Moderna has never deposited its proprietary plasmid in NCBI. Crucially, both Pfizer and Moderna vaccines encode the same prefusion-stabilized SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein and therefore share identical stretches of nucleotide sequence within the Spike ORF coding region. It is within one of these conserved regions that the integration was captured, producing the perfect 20/20 bp match to the Pfizer reference. The probability of a random 20-base sequence perfectly matching a predefined target is ~1 in a trillion. This makes accidental artifact virtually impossible. Multi-omics profiling revealed: – Oncogene activation (KRAS, NRAS, MAPK1, PIK3CA, CHD4, SF3B1) – DNA repair collapse (ATM, MSH2) → genomic instability – Transcriptomic chaos across plasma, blood, and urine The convergence of (i) close temporal proximity to vaccination, (ii) genomic integration of a vaccine plasmid–derived spike gene fragment, and (iii) consistent transcriptomic and proteomic instability across biospecimens represents a highly unusual and biologically plausible pattern. The discovery of spike gene integration directly within a cancer may help explain the surge in post-vaccination “turbo cancers,” as well as emerging signals of transgenerational harm — including excess infant deaths among children of vaccinated parents. Together, these data point to a biologically plausible mechanism linking mRNA injections to oncogenesis and heritable genomic disruption. These findings demand urgent genomic surveillance, orthogonal validation with long-read sequencing, and large-scale cohort studies to fully assess the genomic and oncologic risks of synthetic mRNA technology. This evidence compels the immediate withdrawal of all COVID-19 mRNA products from the market. Humanity now confronts the unprecedented threat of vaccine-induced genomic disruption—a danger too great to ignore. @Docjohnc @neo7bioscience @P_McCulloughMD @McCulloughFund

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING: CDC Child Death Records Indicate CATASTROPHIC Transgenerational Harm of Mass mRNA "Vaccination" A new analysis of CDC data by @EthicalSkeptic shows children born following mass mRNA vaccination of mothers are dying at a 77% excess rate ⬇️ 📈30-year decline in infant/child mortality reversed in 2021 ⚠️Transgenerational effect: sustained excess mortality in children never infected or injected ⚠️Teratogenic signal: deaths rose among infants exposed in utero ⚠️17,975 excess deaths (ages 0–4) since rollout ⚠️ Excess death causes align closely with those observed in vaccinated adults, suggesting the same mechanisms may now carry across generations. The implications extend FAR beyond the current generation. If validated, this would represent a public health crisis of historic magnitude—one not only for those who took the injections, but for the children and grandchildren who never consented to the risks.

@EthicalSkeptic - Ethical Skeptic ☀

🚨Those children born of past-vaccination mothers, despite never having been vaccinated themselves, and despite never having had Covid... are dying now at 77% excess - a 24 sigma event.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

It’s time to come to terms with the fact that approximately 70% of the global population received carcinogenic, gene-altering injections under fraudulent assurances of safety. Immediate market withdrawal and full accountability are now imperative. https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-first-peer-reviewed-study-715

BREAKING: First Peer-Reviewed Study Finds Direct Molecular Evidence of mRNA “Vaccine” Genomic Integration In a Stage IV cancer patient, we identified a vaccine-derived Spike gene sequence chimerically fused into chromosome 19 with perfect 20/20 base-pair identity — a 1-in-a-trillion chance of coincidence. thefocalpoints.com

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

STUDY LINK - Genomic Integration and Molecular Dysregulation in Aggressive Stage IV Bladder Cancer Following COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination: https://ijirms.in/index.php/ijirms/article/view/2130

Genomic Integration and Molecular Dysregulation in Aggres-sive Stage IV Bladder Cancer Following COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination | International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science ijirms.in

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

VACCINAL RNA DETECTED IN CELLS LINING THE PLACENTAL BLOOD VESSELS THAT INTERFACE WITH FETAL CIRCULATION A brand new study from University Hospital of Würzburg PLoS One 21(3): e0344185. Key findings pertaining to the ability of vaccinal spike protein bio distributing through the placenta, to developing fetus: 9 placenta's were tested, and in two placentas VACCINAL mRNA was detected. All 9 of the placentas were negative for Sars Cov II RNA (e.g. this was vaccinal RNA NOT Infection RNA) One placenta belonged to a mother who: *took 3 doses of Pfizer Comirnaty - 2 pre pregnancy and 1 during second trimester, followed by a mild Covid infection at 36 weeks gestation. *Vaccinal mRNA was detected in decidual surface cells (maternal side, part of the uterine lining interfacing with the placenta) One placenta belonged to a mother who: *took 2 doses of Moderna mRNA 1273 (the Moderna Covid vax) PRE PREGNANCY ONLY. No Covid infection at any time. *Vaccinal RNA dectected in villous endothelial cells (fetal side, lining the blood vessels in placental villi that interface with fetal circulation) VACCINAL RNA DETECTED IN CELLS LINING THE PLACENTAL BLOOD VESSELS THAT INTERFACE WITH FETAL CIRCULATION The authors interpret these findings as evidence that modRNA from mRNA vaccines can be taken up or transferred into placental cells, potentially leading to local production of spike protein Long term implications for future health of children who have been exposed to vaccinal mRNA through fetal blood circulation? Unknown (study link in comments) Video shows the last ACIP meeting, during discussion of BIODISTRIBUTION of LNP's and vaccinal mRNA