reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - June 30, 2023 at 1:11 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is facing scrutiny for hiding records related to the origin of the pandemic. Emails between scientist Kristian Andersen, Science Magazine writer Jon Cohen, and Dr. Anthony Fauci were redacted, raising questions about transparency. The NIH provided conflicting reasons for the redactions, citing FOIA exemptions 4, 5, and 6. Additionally, it was revealed that senior NIH officials, including Francis Collins, were involved in redacting FOIA requests. Litigation is ongoing to uncover the hidden information.

@thackerpd - Paul D. Thacker

National Institutes of Health Is Again Hiding Records About the Pandemic’s Origin https://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/national-institutes-of-health-is In the latest example, the NIH gave conflicting legal reasons for blacking out emails sent by Scientist Kristian Andersen and Science Magazine Writer Jon Cohen. #FOIA /1 https://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/national-institutes-of-health-is In

National Institutes of Health Is Again Hiding Records About the Pandemic’s Origin In the latest example, the NIH gave conflicting legal reasons for blacking out emails sent by Scientist Kristian Andersen and Science Magazine Writer Jon Cohen. disinformationchronicle.substack.com

@thackerpd - Paul D. Thacker

"The agency's behavior here indicates to me that it is trying hard to prevent these records from being made available for public scrutiny,” @JamesCTobias tells me. /2

@thackerpd - Paul D. Thacker

The NIH sent Tobias a set of 24 emails--first citing #FOIA exemption 6. When Tobias sued, the NIH sent the exact same email, exact same redactions, this time citing exemption 4 & 5. Compare side to side https://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/national-institutes-of-health-is /3

National Institutes of Health Is Again Hiding Records About the Pandemic’s Origin In the latest example, the NIH gave conflicting legal reasons for blacking out emails sent by Scientist Kristian Andersen and Science Magazine Writer Jon Cohen. disinformationchronicle.substack.com

@thackerpd - Paul D. Thacker

These #FOIA redactions concern emails between Anthony Fauci and Kristian Andersen, who once thought the #COVID19 virus was engineered. After discussion with Fauci, Andersen did a 180, calling suggestions of engineering “fringe” and “crackpot” theories. /4

@thackerpd - Paul D. Thacker

Some months later, Fauci's NIH Institute awarded Andersen $8.9 million to set up a new centre. https://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/national-institutes-of-health-is /5

National Institutes of Health Is Again Hiding Records About the Pandemic’s Origin In the latest example, the NIH gave conflicting legal reasons for blacking out emails sent by Scientist Kristian Andersen and Science Magazine Writer Jon Cohen. disinformationchronicle.substack.com

@thackerpd - Paul D. Thacker

The NIH also redacted an email from Science Magazine's @sciencecohen citing exemptions 4 (trade secrets) & 5 (deliberative). QUESTIONS: How is Cohen's email from whistleblower a trade secret? How is Cohen part of the NIH's "deliberative process"? https://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/national-institutes-of-health-is /6

National Institutes of Health Is Again Hiding Records About the Pandemic’s Origin In the latest example, the NIH gave conflicting legal reasons for blacking out emails sent by Scientist Kristian Andersen and Science Magazine Writer Jon Cohen. disinformationchronicle.substack.com

@thackerpd - Paul D. Thacker

Cohen seems uninterested in the NIH's secretive process. /7

@thackerpd - Paul D. Thacker

Last week, @RandPaul sent a letter to the NIH Acting Director asking him to explain their #FOIA redaction process. https://www.paul.senate.gov/sites/default/files/page-attachments/SRPLettertoNIH.pdf In February, The U.S. Government's Chief Records asked NIH to investigate allegations that agency personnel are shredding documents /8

Page not found - Senator Rand Paul paul.senate.gov

@thackerpd - Paul D. Thacker

According to a report by @EMPOWR_us the NIH has been allowing senior NIH officials, including Francis Collins to help redact #FOIA requests before records are made public. https://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/national-institutes-of-health-is cc: @davelevinthal & @gregorykorte /9

National Institutes of Health Is Again Hiding Records About the Pandemic’s Origin In the latest example, the NIH gave conflicting legal reasons for blacking out emails sent by Scientist Kristian Andersen and Science Magazine Writer Jon Cohen. disinformationchronicle.substack.com

@thackerpd - Paul D. Thacker

.@JamesCTobias continues to litigate w/ the NIH to have the #FOIA redactions removed and to see what is being hidden https://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/national-institutes-of-health-is /END

National Institutes of Health Is Again Hiding Records About the Pandemic’s Origin In the latest example, the NIH gave conflicting legal reasons for blacking out emails sent by Scientist Kristian Andersen and Science Magazine Writer Jon Cohen. disinformationchronicle.substack.com
Saved - October 9, 2023 at 7:21 AM

@ErikaHarveyNZ - Erika Harvey

What does Winston think of the 11,000’vaccine exemptions? See for yourself #nzpol

@chrislynchmedia - Chris Lynch

"Mass disclosure of deception & discrimination” @winstonpeters slams Government’s 11,000 vaccine exemptions granted to “health workers"

Video Transcript AI Summary
Winston Peters, New Zealand First Leader, discusses various topics in an interview. He expresses concern over vaccine exemptions for health workers and the lack of transparency in the government. Peters dismisses a poll suggesting doubt in his claim of not supporting Labour's return to government. He criticizes Labour's values and accuses them of being influenced by radicals on social media. Peters believes that democracy is being undermined through separatism and social engineering. He mentions the negative impact of the Marine and Coastal Areas legislation and expresses the need for media reform. Peters also addresses a controversial incident involving a Māori Party candidate's home and explains his motivation for returning to politics.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Chris Lynch Local News with box man, bio hire our shipping containers, both new and used, available right here in Christchurch. Speaker 1: Ann joining me now is New Zealand First Leader Winston it's nice to see you. How are you? Speaker 2: We're very good. It's been a long campaign as we know, and I left we last spoke with Anita this morning, and they've been in quitechurch all day. And, yes, going back Speaker 1: was looking, as I was saying to you off here, I was looking at your schedule and you are going all over New Zealand. I felt tired looking at it. You're feeling like it's, it's coming to an end or you're rearing to go. Speaker 2: Well, actually, we said, it would be great if it was another 3 weeks. We could really wrap this up pretty good. But, you know, it's the case of a country, the size of the UK, we've got to get around it as fast as we can. Speaker 1: I want to talk about, by the way, the reception you have been getting in Christchurch because that's where you've been over the weekend, but I wanna ask a couple of other questions too that I think are quite important at the moment. Mister Peters, over 11,000 health workers received vaccine exemptions while the public was being urged to vaccinate. Now, in an official information at request, which has been released, Matt Hennett from Tifatahora confirmed a 103 application covering these workers from 13th November to 2021 to 20 of September 2022. What's your reaction to this? Speaker 2: I had great difficulty believing it was true, but I understand it is true. Which shows the discrimination that we're on where people were just mandated out of their jobs, whilst these exemptions were taking place And there were the odd cases that were telling this, and 2 of them were successful, but this is a mass disclosure of, deception and discrimination. And, it's just not a meta being sort of conspiracy theorist or going down a rabbit hole If the mainstream media can't see how seriously dysfunctional and discriminated it was towards people, who had legitimate services have the right to say, I don't agree, and they don't deserve to be in their jobs. That's the the main that's the mainstream media. I mean, this this is awful. We saw that. I thought, this can this has gotta be a fix. It's gonna be trying to so we're trying to get that misinformation. Well, I yeah. Speaker 1: Well, to be honest with you, Winston, I thought the same. I was looking at it and looked legitimate. I may some, calls to the Ministry of Health. They said they couldn't comment you had to talk to Tifat ora. Tifat ora said you have put an official information at request because the questions were too in-depth. Put in a request to another to find a oral organization or a subsidiary, and they said, we can't answer these questions and the minister of health police office said to me, you have to go back to the Ministry of Health for those comments because they were too much of an operational matter they said. So I thought, well, we must be onto something if things are going around in circles. Now I wanna give them the benefit down, it may turn out to be not quite as bad. Speaker 2: We're a democracy, and this is a government that claimed it would be the most transparent ever. Now you see what a lie that was, and we're still didn't even strive to be transparent thought that they could cover it up and get away with it. Take even said this information is out now. Speaker 1: I wanna move on to this taxpayer union courier poll that was out morning I understand, and this poll apparently suggests that New Zealanders doubt your claim that New Zealand first wouldn't support Labour's return to government. What's your response to that? Speaker 2: I don't know. Any time for that courier poll because I caught them during this campaign, putting out a, poll which didn't have any deal with the first garment. I pulled it from out in 5 hours later. They tried to say I was a mistake. Sorry. I've got the transcript of my information where I said, this is up, Pauline. Can't you guys even be honest about it? So on that matter, let me tell you this. If they don't know anybody, now they never will. Speaker 1: You've already started a course on Twitter over the over the past couple of days too that you won't work with labor. I guess there's no love between you and Labour, when you've got a Chris Hopkins stating there, and I quote Winston Peters and New Zealand first values aren't compatible with labors. I wonder what your thoughts were Speaker 2: on those comments. It's it's nice to say, and you know why mister Espin's because your values and your present Labour Party values as Chris Potter wrote in a very insightful article recently, are not labors values either. You've forgotten you or a new manor woman. We got a cost of living crisis, And day after day, it was like, because you're appearing on TV eating sausage rolls. In a cost of living crisis, you can't get anything right. And you're right about your values not being mined. Thank heavens for that. But there are people in the old national labor party who would say Winston Peters values are more like mine. Speaker 1: I get the impression, not with all labor party MPs, but it seems like they're being influenced by the radicals on social media, the radicals on Twitter, and perhaps they have missed or misread the mood of New Zealanders, I say that judging by the current political polls. What do you say? And what do you think I don't wanna spend this entire time talking about why labor's falling in the polls, but what do you what do you think has gone wrong for them? Speaker 2: Yes, because they've just forgotten that the the democracy is about the people and that runners elitist, you know, the latest platform of policies was done affecting too. Real New Zealanders to make this thing a lot of against on the cost of living another 40% We'll say we have to make some serious adjustments to get by. There's 70% of these units, and they're not making any connection with them whatsoever. And that's disappointing, but I'm trying to labor voters, look. Labor stopped and likely so, but you must have vote for him, Winston Peterson. If you're on 1st somebody to be in the room, making sure that governance is for all the people and not an elite, whether it be on the far left or the far right. Speaker 1: Mr. Peter's after meeting meeting New Zealanders with your, horrific schedule up and down New Zealand, including Christchurch over the weekend, What has surprised you in terms of what people are saying about the state of New Zealand? What's the feedback you're hearing that has surprised you? Speaker 2: I can't say that we have monitored like that other than to say the recession has been marvelous, especially, and most importantly from young people, there is also that quiet person that's looking almost like he's angry with you, but only wants to say in his quiet voices, Get rid of these guys as hard as you can, but they're whispering it to me. And so they don't trust the actual system to speak out loud, and that's why we know there's a surge on, and there'll be big kangon legend there. Speaker 1: You've mentioned in the past previously, and I'm paraphrasing here about democracies being threesome, separatism, and social engineering. Can you just outline specifically what you mean? Because a Hero Powell did say that me, New Zealanders felt like never before this country has felt divided. Speaker 2: Was delivered. They set out to undermine the treaty of White Tony by restating what it was when totally falsity with it that setting up. The poor premises that setting up was that, and before the white man arrived, this was a peaceful paradise saying that the Maureen partnership with the Queen Victoria on the 6th February 40 with no one in the UK. Or in the Hong Kong, which a son never said, wasn't a partnership. The third thing they say is we never see this sovereignty. This is colossal stuff now. And the cool thing is they that day on that day co guns began. All that debunked by famous scholars and politicians later up on another, Pormay, it's DeMari, Pormay, to beat it back at famous anthropologists. And before him, famous politician called Carol or Maury, All rooms did nothing of the sort, leaving notebooks about it, but, no, no, here comes out of the sociological park universities, new construction based on a massive lie, And it is worse than this. It's not just racism and apartheid. It is elitism of a very worse sort. And, boy, if you look around the world, there are countries where the elite land things and the mass majority are conformist or they're dictated to, It's not a democracy. Now they're gonna be best in the mainstream media to try and defend this because that'd be part of it. In their, apologetic way they've handled it. Instead of inspecting these things, they've just gone on saying, it's fine. Why do you expect things? If you're saying that your racist nurse is not that we just found the Marine and Coastal Arias legislation in the Christchurch press today, is sitting out the fact that it's illegal. Now that that bill came in because they just thought they would repeal what I'd put the up together with Ellen Clark, and called the for Sean seabed legislation. So we had 6 years of absolute peace and all of a sudden, John Keith decided he and Philipson knew better. Here at times, just yesterday, the court's saying it's illegal. What I missed, but they signed up to the U. S. Declaration that I stopped as well. And it also is that the opens to the city under labor, it's under an excellent act, which had unelected May awards. In the southbound, the whole of border is going to be controlled by NATO. Feel about all the rest of the people from Ireland around down here as well, and all the rest of the Europeans, maybe on the south island. And this is bit like over and over again in every system. It's far better than you think. It's far more sinister, do you think? And this collection is one of those inflation matters, whether we're the victim or we're heading to the 3rd world. That's how important it is. Speaker 1: Mr. Peter's police reported several days ago that the malte party candidate's home wasn't racially targeted or rammed rated as claimed by the candidate. Speaker 3: To the people who rammed rated my house, Speaker 1: In fact, they went on to blame you and your so called rhetoric. I wondered what your take is on the married party's credibility after the police in a roundabout way suggested that what was espoused by the candidate and the Marie party was bullshit. Speaker 2: Oh, look, this is a publicity stunt. And when Rebecca White had a god made Sunday, Saturday morning a week ago, I said to her, this was not a home invasion. This was not a home invasion. I knew it, mom and I heard about it, and long come the police set of deduct the whole thing as kind as they can and they've actually framed it as a advertising stunt, but there's a precedent in the United States where similar political claim was made. They've always been tragically happened to them, and they've found out within very quick time. Was it Jesse Smollett? Oh, he's a smaller case that it was total build dust. Total build dust. When I heard it, I thought Be careful. It won't be amazing because she wasn't home. Good evening. New Zealand is a small country. This has made it difficult for its voice to be heard internationally. Speaker 1: Finally, Mister Peters, I mean, you have had an illustrious career in politics. I wondered why you'd bother going back or wanting to get back into the parliament building when you could be relaxing, chilling out, doing your own thing. Speaker 2: A whole lot of people must trust me, keep asking me that and for good reasons. And I can think of all the great things, you know, the building out on the boat and join yourself and all the things that go with freedom, but Whether you believe we're not or whether you have anybody viewing this today, we're not. I'm on a mission because I can I think this is an inflection relation? We just have to win, but not just to change the government. We gotta get rid of these policies. We have got the clean and the system up. And go back to valuing all of our DNA, you know, whether you're a female or female or young or someone, it doesn't have your ear now legally. I want one country, want people one flag One will for everybody in one boat where every boat is a equal value. When I hear somebody from the my party saying that they've got superior DNA. Which is what part of my leader said. I'm just shocked by that. Shop not for his stupidity, but shocked by way the mainstream media will Brown beaten into accepting that for the disgrace of this or within the other leader, madam of Davidson said that all violence is from cis white men. Speaker 3: I am a prevention violence minister, and I know who causes violence and we're That was white cis men. That was white cis men. Speaker 2: You see what happened there? If I understand something like that, I would have been scoffed out of town, but, no, over and over again, this is happening. So we have to also have a world commission and fixed up our media Speaker 1: That would be nice when the New Zealand 1st, leader Winston Peters. Thank you so much for your time. Appreciate it. Speaker 2: Well, thank you. And you know what? It's great to have many of you with somebody's interest in what they'll say and not turn another soft, but every time we open our mouth. Speaker 1: I do try.
Saved - October 21, 2023 at 9:58 AM

@ElanderNews - Elander & the News

‼️WHO - Pandemic Treaty & IHR amendments. The UK government is refusing to reveal the names of the MPs negotiating on Britains behalf? Listen to what the WHO is demanding. Now ask yourself what your government is hiding?‼️ https://t.co/YRAiARuErf

Video Transcript AI Summary
The WHO, under the leadership of the United States, is developing a pandemic treaty and amendments to international health regulations. These changes would remove human rights protections, enforce surveillance and censorship, restrict freedom of speech, and promote a single narrative. Vaccines could be developed in just 100 days, according to the organization CEPI. The amendments would bind states to enforceable measures, provide a liability shield, eliminate intellectual property rights, enforce digital passports, and allow the WHO director general to declare a pandemic without standards. The WHO would also dictate which drugs can be used during a pandemic. Additionally, the concept of One Health would give the WHO jurisdiction over climate change, animals, plants, water systems, and ecosystems, while devaluing humans compared to animals. (150 words)
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The WHO is developing through all its nations, but with the WHO director, then the United States in charge, a pandemic treaty and amendments to the existing international health regulations that will remove the human rights protections currently, embedded in the IHRs, will enforce surveillance, censorship, get rid of freedom of speech, require governments to censor and only push a single narrative. Also, we will be sub subject, if if they can make this work, to vaccines developed in a 100 days, which the organization CEPI is planning to do. And one of the people who founded CEPI, was Jeremy Farrar, who is now the chief scientist at the WHO, to bring this forward. Other things that amendments do is to bind the states so there are no longer recommendations, but enforceable. Provide a liability shield, get rid of intellectual property rights, move supplies from 1 country to another, enforce digital passports, and the director general of WHO can demand that a pandemic or a potential pandemic exists. He can just declare it with no standards, and then countries around the world will have to obey. Also, the WHO will tell you what drugs you can and can't use in your nation once a pandemic is declared. Obviously, the budget will increase. One Health is another part of this. One Health is a concept that was created to enable the WHO with these documents to take over jurisdiction of everything in the world by saying that climate change, animals, plants, water systems, ecosystems are all central to health. Also embedded in this concept is a peculiar notion that humans are no longer of greater value than animals. And I've got the quote there from The Lancet in January.
Saved - November 1, 2023 at 6:28 AM

@MurfittTauranga - Kirsten Murfitt

When you have to send the Govt its own info as Parliamentary Services says they have looked at a number of sources and can't find any info about the timing and process of the amendments in order to approve my petition. It would seem that the Govt is being stealth. See comments. https://t.co/XYCB4wrWlG

Saved - November 14, 2023 at 10:31 AM

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

WHEN YOU SUBMIT AN OIA ASKING FOR ALL DOCUMENTS CONTAINING THE WORDS "The Health Forum NZ"... and they DECLINE your request So much for truth and transparency #Censored #nz #oia #informedconsent #covidvaccines #vaccineinjuries https://t.co/N3FvhgIizJ

Saved - November 29, 2023 at 6:20 PM

@DrAseemMalhotra - Dr Aseem Malhotra

We did it. New Zealand has rejected WHO amendments before December 1st. Don’t underestimate the power of your speech & the ability to persuade people through dialogue and courageous compassion 🔥

@DrAseemMalhotra - Dr Aseem Malhotra

Whilst in New Zealand one of the country’s most well known politicians came to visit me. It was Chatham house rules so I can’t divulge what was said exactly only that this persons concerns of the cause of excess deaths was aligned with mine. Let the truth continue to rip 👊

Saved - December 1, 2023 at 6:24 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
"We possess highly sensitive government data, accessible for global download on my secure server. This record-level information is invaluable and cannot be dismissed as fraudulent. @minhealthnz cannot deny its authenticity. #DataBreach #GovernmentData"

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

WE HAVE THE DATA 🔥 "We have the data that nobody was supposed to see, and it's now available for anyone in the world to download from my wasabi server". "This is record-level data, that means there's individual record for every person. It's official government data. This is gold standard data. This is ground zero data. And @minhealthnz cannot say that this is fraudulent data or that this is not the data from their database." @stkirsch @HopeRising19 @nzdsos @winstonpeters @chrisluxonmp @ChrisPenknz @cjsbishop @JudithCollinsMP @MurfittTauranga @nzfirst @dbseymour

Video Transcript AI Summary
A renowned expert in immunology and infectious disease, Eric Rubin, emphasized the need to administer vaccines to truly understand their safety. However, public health officials have never released detailed safety data for any vaccine, making it impossible to determine the truth. On November 9th, 2023, a whistleblower from the New Zealand Ministry of Health uploaded record-level vaccine data to a cloud server. This unprecedented release, known as Operation MOAR, revealed the true extent of vaccine-related deaths worldwide, with 13 million people killed. YouTube swiftly removed a video discussing this data, highlighting their bias towards promoting a false narrative. The data, now available for download, provides an opportunity for individuals to analyze it themselves and draw their own conclusions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. Now there's this famous quote from Eric Rubin, New England he's the editor in chief, New England Journal of Medicine. He's on the FDA committee. He's an adjunct professor of immunology and infectious disease at Harvard University. This guy's an expert, right? Can't get any better than this. We're never gonna learn about how safe the vaccines are until we start giving it. You know, he said this. This is not, I'm just like, not out of context. This is legit stuff. And he's right because the clinical trials are too small to find these vaccine effects that happen, in smaller numbers than would be detected in these trials. So we now have the safety data, right? And one small, problem, of course, is that nobody in public health has ever taken, ever looked at it very seriously, Right? They've never released the record level data for any vaccine. No country has ever done that. In the entire world, no state has ever done that. Nobody has released the record level data. So we could look at it. We can't look at it either because it's not there. We can't they're not looking at it. They could like it, but they're not. And they're not releasing it to us, so we can't look at it either. And that's me. Oh, well, I was an unhappy camper until I got this data. And then I was, oh, I was like singing, ding dong, the witch is dead after I got the data. So nobody can ever figure out the ground truth about any vaccine or any pharmaceutical because they're always hiding the data. And I'm the guy, you know, calling for data transparency, but nobody's listening to me. So all that changed for me on November 9th, 2023. I have a Wasabi server and somebody uploaded the data to my Wasabi server in the cloud. And it was a whistleblower in New Zealand. He's he works for the Ministry of Health. And I know his name. I'm one of the very few people in the world he has revealed his identity to. He uploaded the data. I know that I know he's legit. I know he works at the Ministry of Health. And I know that data is legit because I examined the individual data records themselves to verify that the data is legit. And I ran a whole series of statistical tests on the data. And the data is legit. This was also released just a day earlier, this, by, the people involved in this. And they called it Operation MOAR, the mother of all revelations. Because this record level data has never been released by anyone ever before. This is the first time in world history where we can actually see the record level data released from a country. That is stunning. And now, we know why. They don't release it. Now, would you like to see that video? It's an hour video. But and it was posted to YouTube. But in less than 5 minutes, Less than 5 minutes, YouTube took down the video because it violated community standards. The community standards say, you shall not speak about the truth, about the vaccine. You have to lie. You have to tell people it's safe and effective. If you don't do that, you're violating community standards, and they remove your video from YouTube even though you're trying to save lives. Because YouTube is not interested in saving lives, They are interested in promoting a false narrative that is killing people. And anyone who works for YouTube should be ashamed of themselves and they should quit their job. And if you want to know what I really think, talk to me afterwards. You can watch it on Rumble. Okay. And these slides, all of them have hyperlinks, so you can check it out. These slides were posted to my Substack at 6 p. M. When I started the talk. So you can download a PDF version, you can, watch it on Google and so forth. So we now have the data. We have the data that nobody was supposed to see. And it's now available for anyone in the world to download from my wasabi server. And not only that, today only, I am throwing in for free for free the data analysis tools that You need to be able to analyze this for yourself in 5 minutes. So you don't have to take my word for it because I'm just a misinformation super spreader. You can do it yourself. You get the original data, which we have obfuscated so that we don't get into trouble, right? It's all HIPAA compliant. But we preserved all of the fidelity of the data so that we have shifted things such that the statistics are identical, Even though no record matches anything about any of the people in it. So we preserve privacy but we also expose the truth. Okay, so this is record level data. And that means there's individual record for every person. It's official government data. This is Gold Standard data, this is ground zero data. And the ministry of truth oh, sorry, the ministry of health. And New Zealand cannot say that this is fraudulent data or that this is not the data from their database. If they do that, They will be digging themselves into a hole, which will lead to criminal prosecution of the people that lie about this. This is not something they are going to be able to tell a fact checker and claim that this was not real data. And it doesn't get any better than this. I told you, revenge of the nerd. You don't wanna mess with an MIT electrical engineering, master of science degree. You know, This is what it's MIT is all about, is to enable people like me, who are critical thinkers to go and use the skills that I learned at MIT 6041. I had Al Drake as my my teacher. And actually apply those skills to solving real world problems. And And so, for a professional misinformation spreader such as myself, this data is the Rosetta Stone. It unlocked all the mysteries. I thought, Maybe the Medicare data was confounded somehow. I mean, it's like, Wow. All these people are telling me it's safe and effective, and I'm crazy and all this. Nope. Not at all. We can statistically prove now whether a vaccine is, is safe or not from record level data. And the results are objective and easy to interpret. Does the slope go up or it go down? It's really easy, up or down. It's not that complicated. Now, have you ever wondered why it's always kept hidden, right? It's, Basically, that New Zealand record level data shows about the COVID vaccine is not pretty, you know, 13,000,000 people have been killed worldwide. That's what it shows. 13,000,000 people were killed worldwide by the COVID vaccines. Who are the perpetrators? Who is it's the government's. You know, president Biden, he's got 675,000 Americans blood on his hands. And they did it for no benefit. It wasn't like it saved any lives either, didn't save any hospitalizations. No benefit whatsoever. With one exception, it did provide immunity for the pharmaceutical companies.
Saved - December 3, 2023 at 12:36 PM

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

New Zealand police are raiding the home of the Health NZ whistleblower who leaked Covid-19 vaccine mortality data to the world. I don’t know if the data is real. But the fact that they raid him 2 days after it was leaked shows that the NZ Govt is nervous. https://t.co/aAD2gGYFdq

Video Transcript AI Summary
A whistleblower in New Zealand who exposed COVID lies and worked for the Ministry of Health has had their house surrounded by police. Another person who supported the whistleblower also had their house surrounded. The speaker calls on the new government, particularly Winston Peters, to intervene and ensure their release. They emphasize the importance of standing up for truth and exposing government criminality. The speaker urges people to demand the freedom of the whistleblowers and warns that if they are not supported, tyranny will prevail. They ask for help in contacting Winston Peters and the New Zealand parliament to address this urgent situation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm Liz Gunn, and this is an emergency call around the world from New Zealand. Today is Sunday, 3rd December 2023. I'm out in the car that we have. I have had a call to say that the whistleblower who has put out the crucial information, exposing the COVID Lies exposing the information that he had working for the Ministry of Health in New Zealand has had his house surrounded by police at 2:15 today. It has been swarming with police. The time now It's almost 5 o'clock. I have not gone public yet because I wanted not to inflame the situation, but why are the police there still. And this, I heard 10 minutes ago. As well as that 10 minutes ago, the 2nd person who backs up that whistleblower. And one of the people who contacted me along with the whistleblower has had her house now surrounded by police. So those 2 people are no longer available to talk to us and I must put this message out to the world. I would remind the new New Zealand government under Luxon that you must get out the truth and show you are different from the tyrannical Ardern government. This is a massive challenge for you. This is where you show New Zealand what kind of a Government you will be. And particularly you, Winston Peters. Winston, I came around to your house on the eve of putting the information out. I reached you by phone on message. I said I have something very important to offer you. You got into government promising New Zealanders that you would stand up for what we call the freedom truth telling movement. That you would put out A full COVID inquiry. The whistleblower tried to reach you as well. I gave him your number, And he said that he would give you all the information. We were both willing to give you the 1st drop and make you the hero politician of the world. We are still willing to do that, but I'm calling on you, Winston. I am calling on you. Help these people. Make sure Luxon calls off the police. Make sure they are freed immediately. Make sure that this whistleblower is honored as a New Zealand hero for telling the people of the world the truth. The eyes of the world are upon New Zealand, Winston Peters. Not only that. On a personal note, Winston, you know, as I do. My father in the eighties stood by you when no one would listen to you, when you wanted to get the wine box information out. That involved A whistleblower. It was my father who advised Peter Williams to also stand next to you. And it was they who said to the the braying press, wanting your blood, Winston should be honored for putting this story out. Well, here it is, Kamically, now I call on you to return that favor that my father did for you. And beyond that Winston, I did an Credible interview for you at the beginning of the election campaign that helped you get into government. There is no doubt about that. I am asking you, Winston, show that you really meant what you said when you stood in this election and got all those freedom votes. Beyond that, New Zealand and the world. You must send messages to this new government under Christopher Luxon, care of The New Zealand parliament in Wellington, around the world demanding that the whistleblowers be freed and me too if they come for me. This is absolute tyranny. There are 2 things at play here. Yes. The Ministry of Health data is important to protect the privacy, but there is a greater importance. The greater importance is if a government is shown to be criminal, then it is absolutely essential that the people of that country find a way to expose that criminality. And that is what I have done here as a reporter, as a journalist. That is a journalist's role and that is what the whistle blowers have done. That is what whistle blowing is about. This is major criminality on a level of Watergate. It's also major truth telling showing the world what has been done in terms of murder around the world. You either stand by these whistleblowers or you are going to see this sort of tyranny come to your home, your door in future years. And if not you, the doors of your children, we will all be prisoners in future years if the world does not stand by and with and stand up for these whistleblowers. Help New Zealand. We are in dire straits if this new government perpetrates the tyranny and brutality of Jacinda Ardern's ghastly government. This is the challenge. This is when it really counts. Please help contact Winston Peters, care of the New Zealand parliament. Demand that he stands up as well. It is crucial. It is crucial that they are freed.
Saved - December 5, 2023 at 10:45 PM

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

It doesn't just suggest a problem. It shows there is a problem! The NZMH refuses to talk about the data. Why would they do that if their data is exculpatory??

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

Urgent Call for Accountability: Could Jacinda Ardern be Sought for potential Misconduct in Medical Mandate Crisis? As evidence emerges of a potentially explosive leak of highly classified vaccine information that appears to suggest an appalling and significant increase in excess deaths due to the vaccine in New Zealand could the former prime minister be forced to return and account for her administrations actions. Link to explosive testimony of leaded data⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1731365553632055464?s=20 The call for the return of Jacinda Ardern the former Prime Minister of New Zealand who some have accused of fleeing abroad amidst a crisis that some suggest she knew would happen involving a mandated Covid vaccination raises significant ethical, legal, and moral questions. Any leader that is accused of knowingly implementing a policy that could cause harm to the populace, is a matter of grave concern and demands accountability. Was the whistle blower Barry Young arrested to avoid a massive scandal involving Ardern⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1731632653290344862?s=20 Firstly, from an ethical standpoint, leaders bear a responsibility to ensure the safety and well-being of their citizens. Implementing the Covid mandates with knowledge of its potential risks, without transparent communication or consent, violates this fundamental duty. If allegations are true, it's imperative that Ardern faces these accusations and provides explanations for their decisions. Avoiding such scrutiny by fleeing abroad undermines the trust placed in them by the electorate. Legally, every individual, including national leaders, must adhere to the principles of justice and the rule of law. If evidence suggests that a leader knowingly risked public health, they should be subject to legal processes to determine the extent of their liability. Fleeing to avoid such processes is not only a dereliction of duty but also a circumvention of the legal system that they once pledged to uphold. Morally, the act of fleeing in the face of a crisis is a betrayal of the leader's commitment to their nation. Leadership demands facing the consequences of one's actions, especially when those actions have potentially endangered lives. It is a question of moral integrity and the courage to stand by one's decisions, however consequential they may be. Furthermore, the concept of justice and the social contract between a leader and their people necessitates that any leader accused of such serious misconduct must be held accountable. It is a fundamental principle of democratic governance and the rule of law that no individual, regardless of their position, is above accountability. Not even a high priestess of the World Economic Forum Cult is above the law. Did Jacinda Ardern flee New Zealand to avoid facing the repercussions of a harmful mandated medical procedure? There is a compelling argument, both ethically and legally, for her return to face these serious allegations. Such accountability is essential not only for the victims and their families but also for the integrity of the political and legal systems, and the moral fabric of society. Is New Zealand the only country facing this Excess Death Crisis. The facts suggest otherwise⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1731287721350439260?s=20 #VaccineInjuries #mRNA #CovidVaccine #ExcessDeaths #DiedSuddenly #Myocarditus #SpikeProtein #WEF #WEF2030Agenda #DepopulationAgenda #TurboCancers

Saved - December 5, 2023 at 5:11 PM

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

If the vaccines are so safe, why did Health New Zealand demand that Wasabi and MEGA remove the de-identified data? They already acknowledged there is no PHI in the data. That data isn't theirs. What are they afraid of?

Saved - December 6, 2023 at 2:12 PM

@RWMaloneMD - Robert W Malone, MD

Fascinating development. This is yet more evidence of intentional harm by the NZ government

@michaelpbreton - michael breton

New Zealand must be an interesting place to be in. Yesterday, a statistician reveals information on excess deaths and is immediately arrested without bail. Today, it is revealed 11,000 politicians and elites received an exemption for the shots. Time for a national haka. https://t.co/l1wB7d9Kby

Saved - December 6, 2023 at 6:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Amidst controversy, there's turmoil within the World Economic Forum and New Zealand's government. Panic ensues as they try to restrict public access to information. Allegedly, COVID-19 vaccines are linked to a surge in illness and fatalities in New Zealand. Rumors suggest a directive to erase this data, potentially involving former PM Jacinda Ardern. Demands grow to release the data now.

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

Did Jacinda Ardern just order the Data to be deleted? Amidst a growing storm of controversy, there's escalating turmoil within the World Economic Forum and New Zealand's government circles. Panic appears to have set in as they desperately attempt to shut down any public access to the information. This unrest is fueled by a purported leak of sensitive information, allegedly connecting COVID-19 vaccines to a significant upsurge in illness and fatalities in New Zealand. Amidst this chaos, swirling rumors suggest a drastic move: a directive to erase this contentious data. https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1732072545447301367?s=20 While unverified whispers implicate former New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern in potentially ordering this data purge, concrete evidence remains elusive. As the situation unfolds, there are increasing demands to: "Release the Data now!" If she and her former administration have nothing to hide then release the data now. #JacindaArdern #NewZealand #WEF #WEF2030Agenda #DepopulationAgenda #CoverUp #Whistleblower #BarryYoung #DiedSuddenly #ExcessDeaths #mRNA #CovidVaccinations #Myocarditus #ReleasetheDatanow

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

Are the elitists really looking to reduce the Global population by 6 Billion people? Beyond Boundaries: The Perilous Intersection of Global Elitism and Population Control. The rising concerns about the ideology of depopulation are increasingly linked to the World Economic…

Saved - December 7, 2023 at 8:02 PM

@ElanderNews - Elander & the News

‼️WHO - Pandemic Treaty negotiations start again today! The UK government is refusing to reveal the names of those MPs negotiating on Britains behalf! Listen to what the WHO is demanding. And now ask yourself what your government is hiding?‼️ https://t.co/YRAiARuErf

Video Transcript AI Summary
The WHO, under the leadership of the United States, is developing a pandemic treaty and amendments to international health regulations. These changes would remove human rights protections, enforce surveillance and censorship, limit freedom of speech, and promote a single narrative. Vaccines could be developed in just 100 days, according to the organization CEPI. The amendments would bind states to enforceable measures, provide a liability shield, eliminate intellectual property rights, enforce digital passports, and allow the WHO director general to declare a pandemic without standards. The WHO would also dictate which drugs can be used during a pandemic. Additionally, the concept of One Health aims to give the WHO jurisdiction over climate change, animals, plants, water systems, and ecosystems, while devaluing human life compared to animals. (148 words)
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The WHO is developing through all its nations, but with the WHO director, then the United States in charge, a pandemic treaty and amendments to the existing international health regulations that will remove the human rights protections currently, embedded in the IHRs, will enforce surveillance, censorship, get rid of freedom of speech, require governments to censor and only push a single narrative. Also, we will be sub subject, if if they can make this work, to vaccines developed in a 100 days, which the organization CEPI is planning to do. And one of the people who founded CEPI, was Jeremy Farrar, who is now the chief scientist at the WHO, to bring this forward. Other things that amendments do is to bind the states so there are no longer recommendations, but enforceable. Provide a liability shield, get rid of intellectual property rights, move supplies from 1 country to another, enforce digital passports, and the director general of WHO can demand that a pandemic or a potential pandemic exists. He can just declare it with no standards, and then countries around the world will have to obey. Also, the WHO will tell you what drugs you can and can't use in your nation once a pandemic is declared. Obviously, the budget will increase. One Health is another part of this. One Health is a concept that was created to enable the WHO with these documents to take over jurisdiction of everything in the world by saying that climate change, animals, plants, water systems, ecosystems are all central to health. Also embedded in this concept is a peculiar notion that humans are no longer of greater value than animals. And I've got the quote there from The Lancet in January.
Saved - December 12, 2023 at 2:10 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - DiedSuddenly

Steve Kirsch makes it public record and notifies NZ Health with their own data, which shows that they are killing their own people. Plausible deniability is no longer an option. https://t.co/IqXhQzIkiS

Saved - December 20, 2023 at 1:32 AM

@onyxnz - Cooker Wabbit

We are screwing the country over for $$$ but we don't have to tell you that because it's commercially sensitive. Thanks, MOH / Medsafe, for being so transparent!

@nzdsos - NZDSOS - NZ Doctors Speaking Out with Science

Releasing information on how much money the top five companies pay to Medsafe each year "would likely damage the public interest" according to Medsafe's Group Manager... Why would it be so damaging? #StopTheSilence #NZPolitics #nzpol #truth #Pfizer https://t.co/eugguswZbb

Saved - December 20, 2023 at 6:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Crown Law refuses to provide me with information on how the International Health Regulations will affect New Zealand's sovereignty. Taxpayers have the right to know. I will appeal to the ombudsman. Crown Law also claims to have no correspondence on the impact of the IHR on Treaty obligations. Stay tuned.

@MurfittTauranga - Kirsten Murfitt

Crown Law has denied me access to correspondence regarding the International Health Regulations ("IHR") impact on NZ's sovereignty. Both Crown Law and their client, being our former Government, are funded by the taxpayers, and we have the right to know how the IHR will impact our nation. I will appeal to the ombudsman. I also note that Crown Law states it holds no correspondence on how the IHR will impact on Treaty obligations. Spread the word and watch this space.

Saved - January 25, 2024 at 10:14 PM

@MurfittTauranga - Kirsten Murfitt

The Minister of Internal Affairs has confirmed that the public will be consulted on potential changes to the CV19 inquiry's terms of reference. NB: Greg has permitted me to share this correspondence. https://t.co/6nAOuEFXsS

Saved - January 26, 2024 at 7:38 PM

@BarryYoungNZ - Barry Young

Amazing revelation from Ministry of Health New Zealand! So they ARE looking at the Covid vaccine data not to find a VERY strong safety signal BUT to try and shut it down and remove the deceased records from the analysis! WHO do they work for? People of New Zealand? https://t.co/7wBnsMvxya

Saved - March 1, 2024 at 5:47 AM

@bruce_mcgonigal - Bruce McGonigal

We need to know if the materials sent to Wuhan in 2019, from the Bio 4 lab in Winnipeg, were used in to Gain of Function of COVID-19. We can't trust the Justin Trudeau Government to tell us the truth. https://t.co/5xh73hGCCS

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker from Halton Hills accuses the government of neglecting national security, citing documents that show collaboration between Canadian government employees and Beijing's biological weapons unit. The Health Minister's claim that no sensitive information left the country is contradicted by the documents. The speaker questions if the minister still supports those comments. Translation: The speaker criticizes the government for ignoring national security concerns and collaborating with Beijing's biological weapons unit. The Health Minister's statement that no sensitive information left the country is disputed by the documents. The speaker questions if the minister still stands by those remarks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Halton Hills. The documents, mister speaker, reveal a shocking disregard for Canada's national security. They reveal a government that is completely asleep at the switch on national security and the machinery of government. They reveal government employees collaborating with Beijing's government and with the biological weapons unit of the People's Liberation Army. Equally shocking are the health minister's comments. He said yesterday, there is there was no evidence of actual actual breaches at the lab, and no sensitive information actually left the country. The documents say otherwise. Does the minister stand by those comments?
Saved - March 27, 2024 at 3:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
During the discussion on Foreign Election Interference, it was acknowledged that while transparency is crucial, maintaining secrecy is equally important. This admission suggests that the inquiry may be insincere, with the government likely to produce a report defending its actions, except for the undisclosed aspects.

@govt_corrupt - govt.exe is corrupt

#BREAKING: During the opening remarks on Foreign Election Interreference, It was stated that although it's important to be open and transparent, it's equally important to remain secretive. They just admitted the entire inquiry is a farce and govt will make a report saying everything it did was right other than the stuff you are not allowed to see!

Video Transcript AI Summary
A commission of inquiry must balance the need for transparency with protecting Canada's national security. It is important for the public and journalists to know if foreign actors targeted Canada's democratic process, but revealing sensitive information could harm national interests. While transparency is crucial, secrecy is also necessary in certain situations to prevent more harm than good.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That characterize a commission of inquiry with the need to protect Canada's national security interest. I think it is appropriate to highlight some of the finding reached through this exercise. On the one hand, no one can reasonably challenge the fact that the public and journalists who work to inform the public have a vested interest in knowing whether Canada's democratic process have been targeted by foreign actors and whether their actions had an impact on election integrity. The process adopted by this inquiry must therefore be as transparent as possible and lead to a report that can be reviewed, understood and waived by the public. Many have stressed this point and I share this view. On the other hand, it is clear that both the government and the public clearly have a compelling interest in preserving and protecting the confidentiality of information, the disclosure of which could damage our national interest. And that a public inquiry that will reveal highly sensitive information could, depending on the circumstances, do more harm than good. Some witnesses have explained why. The lesson here is that if openness and transparency are virtues, so is secrecy in certain circumstances.
Saved - July 10, 2024 at 8:00 PM

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

BREAKING - IMPORTANT NEWS FOR ALL KIWI'S WHO WERE MANDATED IN EDUCATION AND HEALTH SECTORS Please listen and SHARE WIDELY Please copy and paste the written version of this post (see in comments) into a letter to your MP. This is huge news https://t.co/ZoPq8FjG0w

Video Transcript AI Summary
Linda from Health Forum NZ shares a bombshell revelation from NZTS0S about a Ministry of Health report showing low transmission risk in schools and healthcare settings. Despite this, the government implemented unnecessary vaccine mandates causing harm. Expert witnesses in court failed to disclose this information, potentially committing perjury. NZTS0S seeks to appeal to the Supreme Court for justice. They urge affected individuals to share this revelation to hold those responsible accountable. Financial support may be needed for the appeal. Take action by contacting MPs and spreading awareness on social media. This urgent message highlights the need for accountability and justice.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi, everyone. It's Linda here from the Health Forum NZ. I've just got something really important that I would like to share with you tonight. This is some news from, New Zealand teachers speaking out with science or NZTS0S. So, the message is headed bombshell revelation. Nztsos have uncovered a science and insights report that was published by the Ministry of Health in October 2021 which totally demolishes the Labour government's narrative around the grave risk that existed in schools and health care settings at the time. Because of this discovery, we now know that before the health and education mandate order was signed, the government had in its possession high quality evidence that the risk of transmission in schools and healthcare settings was insignificant and that the vaccination mandate was therefore totally unnecessary. There's no easy way around the importance of this document. It's the Ministry's own contact tracing data. It has a very large sample size making it highly reliable Over what over 11, 000 education contexts were analyzed, and it's the most relevant piece of information that that they would have had in their possession in relation to the vaccine mandates. It told the government that in health care settings, only 1 in 500 contacts became infected. While in educational settings, just 1 in 1, 000 contacts became infected. Yet knowing all this, Hopkins went ahead and signed the mandate order that brought so much unnecessary pain and suffering on so many. Can it get get any worse than this? Well, unfortunately, it can. Health and education workers, nzdsos and nztsos went to the high court in March 2022 to have the vaccination mandate order declared unlawful. The crown produced sworn affidavits from 4 witnesses, mister Hipkins, miss McKay Mackay, doctor Towne and doctor Bloomfield with doctors Towne and Bloomfield being accepted by the court as expert witnesses Now there are very strict rules that control the evidence of an expert witness. They must swear to assist the court impartially and also that they will tell the court if any part of their evidence is incomplete or inaccurate without some qualification. Doctors Towne and Bloomfield both would have known about this highly relevant Ministry of Health Analysis, but they did not reveal this to the court. NZTSOS believed that by keeping this from the high court, doctors Towne and Bloomfield clearly contravene the rules for expert witnesses and potentially open themselves to a charge of perjury. Another crown witness, miss miss McKay also kept highly relevant information from the court. She correctly told the court that only 11 applications for serious service disruption exemptions had been granted, but she failed to tell the court that 1 application alone was for 971 workers and and that by the date of her affidavit, these 11 applications covered a total of 2, 833 workers. All of this while hundreds of other phone workers were being terminated because of what the court approvingly termed the government's 0 tolerance approach, if only the court had known. NZTS0S is now seeking leave to appeal to the supreme court and 1 of their claims that these is that these serious omissions in the evidence presented by the crown's witnesses has led to a miscarriage of justice. What can you do to help? Well, if the n zed TS0S appeal is accepted, they're going to need financial help, but that can wait for the moment. Right now, they need everyone who's been affected by the mandate to help share this bombshell revelation. We need to make it difficult for the supreme court to quietly decline their application in the hope that it will all just go away So can you please write to your MP? Can you share this post with others? If we do all our bit, if we all do our bit to publicize this bombshell, we may yet succeed in holding to account those who've perpetrated this grave injustice. So that is a a very urgent, and shocking post from n zed teachers speaking out with science. I will also put the, written copy of this post beneath the video. So please help them write to your MP copy and paste this post into a letter to your MP and please share it widely on social media. Thank you.
Saved - July 16, 2024 at 7:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In two recent Official Information Act responses, contradictory answers were given regarding the availability of information on adverse events following Covid-19 immunization by batch. In February 2022, it was stated that batch numbers are recorded in the COVID Immunisation Register (CIR). However, in June 2024, Medsafe revealed a new database that can report on serious adverse events by batch, while in July 2024, a request for adverse events by Pfizer batch was declined, claiming the information did not exist. This lack of transparency is concerning.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

Two Official Information Act responses within a month revealing seemingly contradictory answers. We have known since February 2022 that 'batch numbers...are recorded in the COVID Immunisation Register (CIR). When an Adverse Event Following Immunisation (AEFI) report is made, the AEFI assessment is generated to include the CIR information alongside the information in the AEFI report.' On 7 June 2024 Medsafe responded to a December 2021 request revealing a new database has the ability to report on serious adverse events following Covid 19 immunisation by batch. However, on 2 July 2024, a request for adverse events following Covid injection by Pfizer batch, was declined by Medsafe on the grounds that the information did not exist. This appears to be an appalling lack of transparency... #nzpol #Covid_19

@nzdsos - NZDSOS - NZ Doctors Speaking Out with Science

** Breaking ** Two Official Information Act responses within a month revealing seemingly contradictory answers. We have known since February 2022 that 'batch numbers...are recorded in the COVID Immunisation Register (CIR). When an Adverse Event Following Immunisation (AEFI) report is made, the AEFI assessment is generated to include the CIR information alongside the information in the AEFI report.' On 7 June 2024 Medsafe responded to a December 2021 request revealing a new database has the ability to report on serious adverse events following Covid 19 immunisation by batch. However, on 2 July 2024, a request for adverse events following Covid injection by Pfizer batch, was declined by Medsafe on the grounds that the information did not exist. This appears to be an appalling lack of transparency... #nzpol #Covid_19

Saved - August 30, 2024 at 7:38 AM

@Fr33Rang3 - freerange.nft

Eyes gone, I am glad I don't carry his conscience co'z Chris James all ready looks like he knew he'd been duped but hoped for the best with a zillion questions floating around in his head. this is Micro Expression Guilt Doubt Remorse & oh WTF am I doing here ? give him a whistle

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

Chris James Needs to Be Questioned Publicly During Phase Two of The NZ Covid Inquiry. Chris James is the Group Manager of Medsafe, New Zealand's Medicines & Medical Devices Safety Authority. Here he is alongside former Director general of Health @AshBloomfield on the 3rd and 4th of February 2021, when it was announced that Medsafe had just granted provisional approval for the Pfizer BioNTech Covid-19 mRNA injection. He looks rather uncomfortable, don't you think? If you read the article and watch the video in the thread below, you'll get some idea why. Please retweet. @nzfirst @winstonpeters @TanyaUnkovichMP @actparty @dbseymour @BrookevanVelden @NZNationalParty @chrisluxonmp @JudithCollinsMP @ChrisPenknz @nzlabour @chrishipkins #nzcovidinquiry2

Video Transcript AI Summary
Medsafe has approved the Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine for use in New Zealand. This provisional approval was agreed to and gazetted today by Medsafe. This marks the start of a new chapter in New Zealand's COVID-19 response and is a significant milestone. The most important things under consideration have been the safety, effectiveness, and quality of production of the vaccine. Medsafe's assessment process is extremely robust. Medsafe has completed its work with its advisory committee, looking at the data from clinical trials to advise on using the Pfizer vaccine in New Zealand. Even as the vaccine is rolled out, New Zealand's elimination strategy is still the way the country is dealing with the virus. Medsafe's process is meant to reassure New Zealanders that this vaccine and others that come after it are safe, effective, and the right thing to use in New Zealand.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nice to see you all back here today. As Speaker 1: you would have heard, a little earlier on, the prime minister has announced that Medsafe has approved the conditions of the, the Pfizer BioNTech COVID 19 vaccine for use in New Zealand. That provisional approval was agreed and gazetted today by MedSafe. And I've got with me here Chris James, who's the group manager of Med Safe who'll talk shortly and help me with responding to your questions. So the provisional approval is very much the start of a new chapter in New Zealand's COVID-nineteen response and a significant milestone in that response. I do want to recognize the work of Chris and his team at Medsafe, our country's medicines regulator, in working so hard to get to this point of approving this vaccine alongside the analysis and advice provided by the Medicines Assessment Advisory Committee yesterday. The most important things that have been under consideration in this process, and Chris will talk more to this, are the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine and quality of its production. The assessment process that Medsafe undertakes, as with all the medicines, is extremely robust. Kia ora koutou katoa. I'm Doctor Ashley Bloomfield, Director General Health. And I've got with me today Chris James, who's the group manager at Medsafe. Medsafe's our independent medicines regulator, here in New Zealand. And it's just completed the work, with its advisory committee on looking at the very first vaccine against COVID-nineteen that we will be able to deploy in New Zealand. You may have heard the announcement by the Prime Minister just this afternoon. Exciting news. And this does mean that all the planning we have been doing over the last few months and the hard work that Medsafe has been doing to look at all the information, all the data from clinical trials that's out there to provide us with advice on whether or not we should, use this first vaccine that's available for New Zealand, the Pfizer vaccine. What I should say before I throw a few questions Chris' way is that we still are in the middle of this global pandemic. And in many senses, even as we roll out this vaccine and other ones that we hope will be available for us when they're approved. Our elimination strategy is still absolutely the way that New Zealand is dealing with this virus. This is an exciting day. We have got approval for the first of these COVID-nineteen vaccines, the Pfizer vaccine. And so I'm gonna talk with Chris a little bit about the process Medsafe uses to reassure us, all of us as Kiwis, how we know that this vaccine and others that come after it are absolutely safe and effective, and that they are the right thing for us to use here in New Zealand.
Saved - September 2, 2024 at 7:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Health New Zealand reported that 25,623 people died within 93 days of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. I previously shared an email from the Coroners Court indicating that deaths could occur up to 93 days post-vaccination. In 2021, New Zealand registered 35,007 deaths, with a 10% increase in 2022. HNZ clarified that the reported figure encompasses all-cause mortality, including accidental deaths, which raises questions about the accuracy of COVID-19 death classifications. What do you think?

@MurfittTauranga - Kirsten Murfitt

Health New Zealand (“HNZ”) states that 25,623 people have died within 93 days of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine in New Zealand. As you may recall, I posted an email from the Coroners Court to the Ministry of Health dated 23 August 2021 which stated that research showed that death following the COVID-19 vaccine "might be as long as 93 days". The original post is below. According to Te Whatu Ora’s website, in 2021 there were 35,007 deaths registered in New Zealand. Stats NZ’s website affirms that deaths rose by 10% in 2022. HNZ states that the figure that they released in response to my Official Information Request under the Act is for "all-cause mortality" and includes deaths such as accidents. As you will recall a man that died from a gunshot in Auckland was counted as a COVID-19 death. What are your thoughts? Links in the comments below. @nzdsos @KimDotcom @HopeRising19 @PeterSweden7 @winstonpeters @nzfirst @SeanPlunket @theplatform_nz @actparty @BrookevanVelden @Strange_G @infowars @SGTreport @sussdoc @RCR_NZ

@MurfittTauranga - Kirsten Murfitt

As promised, the OIA response which contained this email stating that death could occur up to 93 days after the injection. https://t.co/iG7aKHPg5Z

Saved - September 24, 2024 at 10:53 PM

@BarryYoungNZ - Barry Young

Breaking! Yes this is an actual OIA. H2024046111 First denying the existence of an email I sent to Health NZ Bosses warning of the dangers of the covid vaccine. Then doubling down that it did not exist. Finally admitting they had it all along! D'oh! Way to instil trust guys! https://t.co/bPYyRLVktu

View Full Interactive Feed