TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
The #EU has declared the Covid Vaccines were approved illegally. LISTEN 👂…. Can you hear it? Justice is coming #WHO, #CDC, #FDA, #WEF & @BillGates. https://t.co/T5OyqoqUex
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, John Loughlin interviews Marcel de Graaf, Joachim Koos, and Willem Engel about their letter to the European Medical Agency (EMA) regarding the withdrawal of COVID vaccines. They discuss various arguments against the vaccines, including procedural violations, alleged confusion between test batches and actual batches, and the harmful nature of the vaccines. They highlight the dangers of the vaccines, such as myocarditis and pericarditis, and the potential corruption and illegality surrounding their approval. They also mention the suppression of text messages by Ursula von der Leyen and the erosion of sovereignty by the European Union. The speakers express their concerns and call for action against the vaccines.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, hello, everybody. I'm John Loughlin, director of FVD International, Forum For Democracy International. We're in the European Parliament today. I'm delighted to welcome, as my guest today, Marcel de Graaf, member of the European Parliament for Forum For Democracy, Joachim Koos, member of the European Parliament for Alternative fur Deutschland, Anvila Engel, who is a campaigner, and, chairman or or president of Virus Truth, Virus Varheit, which is a a pressure group that campaigns on, on the issue of vaccines and COVID related policies. We are discussing today the letter which, Marcel De Graaf, Joachim Koos, and other members of the European Parliament have written to the European Medical Agency.
In this letter, which is a 20 page document or so, very densely argued and which I encourage, our viewers to read. You can find it on Marcel Dehaaf's website and also as a link to it, from FED international.com. There are a number of, arguments made in favor of this appeal to withdraw the vaccines. Some of the arguments concern procedures, procedures which were either not followed or which were deliberately violated or changed in advance. Other arguments concern, the use to which the vaccines have been put allegedly, wrongly.
There are also arguments concerning the the harmful nature of the vaccines, and even, arguments, concerning alleged, a confusion between the, batches which were used for testing and the batches which were actually used, on people. Marcel, among all these arguments, perhaps you'd like to tell our our our viewers, what you what has what has brought you to do this this letter. And what are the most important points, do you think?
Speaker 1: Yes. Well, to start with, and that's why William Engel is here, I I got I, got a copy of the letter that Wilhelm sent to, the Dutch, medical agency, with a lot of the same, arguments is that we used in that letter because I contacted Willem, and I said, well, we like to use, your letter as a as a concept, to and we had to rework it, of course, because we have a completely different leg legislation for the European Medical Agency as for the Dutch, institute that that, approves medicines. So we had to rework it, but I got this letter, and I was shocked because we already know a lot of things about these COVID vaccines. We know that they are not effective. I mean, If a vaccine is effective, then why got 4 of them or 5 or whatever, because they still, don't work after the first time, which in my time, when I was young, a vaccine would create immunity immediately.
Speaker 0: Well, you made a video about this, sir, not so long ago, you said if we if they were if they worked, you wouldn't need boosters all the time.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So that's pretty good fix. So that we knew that already. I mean and we know that the details on the contracts are not given to the public, so it's all, its secrecy and hidden SMSs and, and money going to places where we don't know it, if it's used well or not taxpayers' money. So we we already had an idea that this this whole thing was Messi and and and and, in some way, corrupted.
But then I got this letter, and it basically said, well, this this approval and the the way we got to this approval is also completely messed up And messed up in a way that really shocked me because if you approve a batch, a certain vaccine or certain medicine. Then you expect that the medicine that is approved is the medicine that is applied to patients or to citizens. And if there's a difference between that, then you are basically being vaccinated with a nonapproved
Speaker 0: with something that wasn't approved.
Speaker 1: Whatever substance. So, Well, that really shocked me, and that that was why
Speaker 2: I was
Speaker 1: so enthusiastic about the action of Filament that I said, well, We need to take this to a much higher level. We need to take this to European level because every European citizen is being exposed to something They shouldn't be at first.
Speaker 0: One of the points that struck me. I mean, a number of the arguments are are rather technical. They concern, procedure and so on. But there's one detail that I think anyone can understand, and that is that the, descriptions the official descriptions of these, vaccines run to, respectively, 574 pages and 224 pages. And doctors are supposed to read these 5 well, I've thousands of pages, to decide whether or not, to administer these vaccines.
Joachim. Is that for you the most important point? That that struck me as an example of the European Union because this is, tolerated by the European Medical Authority, actually creating illegality. It's actually creating a regime of illegality. It.
It's a it's a gigantic machine for generating legislation as we know the European Union. But here it is creating objectively a system of illegality because no no doctor Has the Time to Read these 500 pages for each medicine that he prescribes. What's what's your what led you to, to to to sign this letter?
Speaker 2: I think, it's many things. As Marshall said, there are so many things which are going really wrong in a in a in a very big scale, so far, it's so, unbelievable what we find. We we look on one aspect, and then you find fort or something else, something really, so hindrances and big, big mountains. You cannot surmount them. Yeah.
You cannot go you must go outside of them and, be beyond them. And, therefore, it's so many things which are clearly stunning and and stunningly. It began at the beginning as it was in the 1st year when when when the things, went, wrong. And, it doesn't it didn't change. And I, as a member of the parliament in, in the committee of budget and budgetary control.
I was very much involved with money. It's a money issue, you know, and it went wrong so so wrong for me as a as a as a very frugal person who thinks, you must pay for all things, and now they have Yeah. Billions of billions of euros throwing to the to the, the pharmaceutical firms about money about things which are not women which are not safe and which are, say, safe for themselves, say, we cannot, we cannot say it's safe. Yeah? And that was for me, it was an an enlightenment when when the the one of the the directors of Pfizer told the committee who is was looking into it that you that you said we didn't know it.
Yeah. And and and, therefore, We have no, proof that it is safe.
Speaker 0: That's right. That's right.
Speaker 2: So so so insane, and, therefore, I was very alert, and I spoke a lot about Sissingh and about, vaccination. And and at last, I was a little bit annoyed about, our president, Metzler, Then she wrote letter after letter that we should be vaccinated again.
Speaker 0: Yes. Yes.
Speaker 2: It's it's therefore, except for me, thinking And we've wrote, to her and said it's not okay. Yeah. We should not be coerced to be vaccinated.
Speaker 0: Well, coercion is the, or at least interference is the key. I mean, I'm very interested in the procedural aspects. I was I was struck as well by the evidence you found. I I imagine you found this villain, that the European Medical Authority tried to accelerate the procedure. In other words, instead of sitting there truly and waiting for providers to come to them and show that their product is safe.
And so so the the these procedural things fascinate me, but I suspect our viewers are more interested in the substantial medical issues. Are they safe, or are they dangerous? You, Claire. They're dangerous.
Speaker 3: They're clearly dangerous, because they did not follow. And one of the procedures that was overlooked or fast tracked, and it's called a major objection, and it has a lot to do with the good manufacturing practice, that says that you have to have the procedure down to the minutiae so you know that the product is always the same wherever you produce it and whenever you produce it. That it was clearly not in order, and that probably has led to the differences between those batches. So some groups of batches have a very high incidence of, of adverse effects, but you do not know beforehand which ones. So the precautionary thing here to do is to say we have to regard all batches as unsafe.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 3: So that's the first thing.
Speaker 0: And you
Speaker 3: cannot change it to say, well, only 4% of the batches is unsafe. So Yeah. That that's an acceptable risk.
Speaker 0: Are the different batches a differently dangerous So
Speaker 3: we're talking about vaccines, erroneously. This is a new platform. It's an mRNA platform, which technically and scientifically and also legally is considered advanced medical therapeut therapeutical products. So in in a sense, it's gene therapy. Yeah.
Now the scale it has been produced has also never been done. The adjuvants that were used has also never been done. So this is a a worldwide experiment. And if you go down to those clinical trials on which the SMPC documents are based. You clearly see that some of them read real world data.
We are the guinea pigs. There's no going, going around it. It's an experimental gene therapeutic, product that was fast tracked, by changing the rules, bending the rules, and trying to cover up those changes in the in the direct directive of 2021 on this the the 24th March. And and what you see there is on every level a little bit of tweaking the process so you get a completely unapproved, completely unsafe product on the market.
Speaker 0: That's the procedural side. Why are they that's it. Basically, you I understand. I we are we understand. But why are they dangerous?
Us. You mentioned myocarditis. You mentioned pericarditis. You mentioned heart disease, particularly affecting, young men, apparently.
Speaker 2: And even even fatalities? Yeah.
Speaker 0: Yeah. So let's let's let's concentrate on the substantial
Speaker 3: Yeah. If we look at the adverse effects Yeah. And and for the record, I was trained as a pharmaceutical scientist, so This is really my field. If you look at the adverse effects, it's very broad, and we've discussed this with with immunologists, effectiologists, also with pathologists, and what they find is that it is because of the choice of the target of the antigen. So the antigen, the spike protein is divided in 2 units, and one of those units is actually toxic.
So when that distributes all around the body in every organ where it's, accumulates, and that can take months months Until your next jab, so you get this inflammation in all these organs. Yes. And that's why we see such a vast array of adverse effects. The most important one is, of course, the vascular system
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 3: Because it goes through the body, and this is one of the things that was missed because it was, unjustly categorized as a vaccine. If it's categorized as an, as a gene therapy, you have to do this distribution studies. In Japan, they did it. That's why we found out that it accumulates in every, adipose tissue. So that's bone marrow.
Well, if it's in bone marrow, that heightens the chance on all kinds of, cancers. If it's, in the arteries that hides the the chance of aneurysms, on Tias
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 3: On, myocardial infarct infarcts. So, we clearly see that not only the target that was chosen, but the platform that was chosen and the delivery, the lipid nanoparticle, which makes it distributable all over the body. We're all very, very ill advised.
Speaker 0: One of the points you make in the what you make in the letter to the EMA, and which I imagine comes from your, your, case against the Dutch Medical Authority. Mhmm. Is that the rules on genetically modified organisms were changed? Is are these vaccines genetically modified organisms, or are they organisms which modify genes? So Are they modified themselves, or do they then modify
Speaker 3: So both of genetics. Both of those actions or mechanisms are in play here. So this letter was only directed towards the injections that are based on the mRNA platform. Normally, When we do gene therapy, we use a viral vector. So AstraZeneca made an injection, which is also gene therapy, but this was specifically focus against mRNA.
Now the argument of the proponents was, well, there is no chance it will shed because it will not replicate. Although there is a batch that actually does the SA self amplifying mRNA, to to to mitigate the the risk concerning normal gene therapeutic, platforms. But what we see now is that it's also contaminated with DNA strands, and these DNA strands actually contain parts of other viruses, the SIMION 40 virus, which is associated, with cancer.
Speaker 0: Perhaps you could explain for us our RNA, DNA. Yeah. So I know it's very basic for you.
Speaker 3: But So so, normally, what you carry as hereditary, molecules that is basically, the program of you, your body, and and your function is is programmed in DNA. It's double trended. It's, not prone to mutation, but to get from there to a function or to a protein, we need an intermediary, and that's RNA. So the whole idea was to hijack the the the signaling system to make your body produce something that is designed in a lab. Yeah.
So the whole idea is a is a great idea, But you have to test whether it's safe. And when you look at genetically modified organisms, there is a regulation 2,000 one slash eighteen for the European Union. This was bypassed in 2020 Yeah. To make it, to make the clinical trials legal
Speaker 0: Sean.
Speaker 3: Because they don't know what ends up in the environment. They don't know the effect on our genes. But looking closer to it, there was an even more important one, the regulation 2019 slash 5, that actually bypassed parliamentary scrutiny and said, okay. All the conditions that are, proposed for, conditional marketing authorization, including the classification of these, biologicals as they're called, so these medicinal products. We hand over to a committee of experts.
Now what they did is they misused that delegation to create a pseudo, legal system, which they then tried to bypass or tried to push through parliament in 2, 2021. So it had the the approval of the European Commission and the European Parliament. In reality, there is no legal approval of any of these injections.
Speaker 0: Marcel. You used the word corrupt or corrupted just now. The procedures have been corrupted.
Speaker 1: Yes. Yes. Because if you have, for for decades, used certain procedures Because you really want to protect, the population and protect patients, from harmful medicines. Then you go through a to a very precise procedure with testing, its scrutiny so that you and really are 100% sure that you end up with a medicine that's safe to use for the specific category of people that you want to use it on. Now if you start changing these procedures to push through something that's experimental, Then you then you can start asking questions.
Where were all these 1,000,000 used for that were paid to fight, sir, Emma Derna? Why are all these officials, who are doing their jobs for for decades in a very decent way, certainly, open to change all these rules and to, bypass all these safety measures because that's what these procedures are for. They are safety measures. They're safe, and they're for our safety.
Speaker 0: Yep.
Speaker 1: That's why these measures are there. And then you put them aside because of some experimental stuff that you, in a in a in a very high speed want to pull through this process to inject into people that something is really, really wrong. That's why I'm using the word corrupted. Yeah. I mean, they they you corrupt the procedures In in this.
Guarantee your safety.
Speaker 0: In the word, corrupted, there is the word corrupt, and there is the allegation, is there not, that Ursula von der Leyen suppressed her text messages, with the head of Pfizer, if I'm not mistaken. Would you like to, tell us where we are on that. Have they been released, these text messages? Have they disappeared? And and and and, most specifically, is it corruption, not just corrupted.
Speaker 2: That must, a a judge, a court, must decide on that, and therefore But the political action
Speaker 0: can be made. Yeah.
Speaker 2: You are sure. But, Stefan Vivi Vivid for such, EPPO, the prosecutor office in, Luxembourg will Ko On. And with this case, because, also, if there has there a case, still open and to many cases as I as I heard? And but we didn't hear anything about the ongoing of this, this investigation. And, therefore, I am as a political and as an MVP, I am sure There will be no result Yes.
Even not not before the election next year. Yes. And when she when therefore, it's it's only for from to to to to to feel so people feel safe. All the thing all things are working. All systems are working and so on.
But they are all working together in the some sense about and and it's corruption in in the political sense. In the political sense. Really corruption. I'm sure. And it began for me, it began with the origin of SARS CoV 2.
The the origin of SARS CoV 2, I think, is the biggest Ford, the biggest, the
Speaker 0: You mean, you mean, the lab? The the lab here. The lab
Speaker 2: here. Things. Yeah. It's it's really the biggest cover up in in medical history. Yeah.
What what are they doing there? And therefore, it began with a with reports, the system, And it goes on with a corrupt, solution. It's a solution which we which we didn't need. Yeah. And if we we are going on and on and on with with such with such things which we don't need, I was never vaccinated about Vipsis, mRNA technologies, and I'm happy about that.
And I think we the solution will be most more people must see also that things are really deteriorating ratings. They are going wrong and wrong and and and and worse and worse, and then they will wake up. And then they will say, no. Never never more anymore, vaccination, and that will be a good, a good Hussarld for
Speaker 0: one of the purposes, of course, of the yeah.
Speaker 1: Vinam said something, something else which, comes close to what, Joachim Hussain. It is a conditional approval, and then you prolong the approval.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: What you see with this, all these institutions is that they cover each other.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: They're covering, 4 von der Leyen's, SMSes. They're covering for this conditional approval. Now we get this prolongation.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: It was addressed by Willem in the Netherlands. How can you prolong a conditional approval. If you have all these data about adverse effects, the same question that we were asking, at the EMA, The answer to Willem is, well, you have to go to the EMA. You don't you can't ask us because we just are just doing what Europe is asking from us.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And that's why you've and that's why you've addressed this letter to the EMA.
Speaker 1: Are responsible in the Netherlands for the the safety of the Dutch people Yeah. And the EMA for the European people. So you see, they're pointing to each other and how do you respond to it? It's and that is also part of this network of covering each other.
Speaker 0: Well, Willem, you were yourself, I believe, arrested
Speaker 3: Four times already.
Speaker 0: Four times. Tell us about that.
Speaker 3: The the Peel case, is continuing. It's What
Speaker 0: were you arrested for?
Speaker 3: For well, the alleged thing is that I have incited Yeah. People to break the law by going to a protest
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 3: Which already is, dictatorial Yeah. On itself, if you do not allow people to call for a protest.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 3: It's a ridiculous case. Unbelievable. But even in Germany democracy. The In Germany, it's even worse because Michael Baldeck, which organized a lot of protests, he was in prison in the pretrial prison for 9 months, and now they have dropped the case. So they locked up an innocent guy for 9 months.
Speaker 2: Because of alleged fraud. Yeah. Not not because of, participation at an,
Speaker 3: in the rally. Yeah. And and this liberal values. And yes. But but this gaslighting, Ting because I want to allude to the point of, Marcel.
What we see here in this case of the injections and the whole COVID case, you could say, This is an usurping of power by the European Commission. By try trying to circumvent parliament, by trying to create pseudo laws, their, now usurping the power of health. The whole EU for health program, which is based on the one health ideology, is really scary. If we look to the WHO treaty, this is an exponent of what's actually happening here in this house or next door at the commission. So by trying to answer this letter that we wrote to the Dutch version of the EMA, And their answer was telling they said, well, we do not have the authority.
You have to go to Europe Yeah. Which is untrue. In all this European legislation, it clearly states that the end, result or the the the person that is ultimately responsible is the sovereign state itself, and that is a thing that is very worrisome. That with this COVID narrative, The sovereignty is taken away from the states even more.
Speaker 0: Yep.
Speaker 3: And and that's why I'm so happy that Now we have a pincher movement in that in that sense that we're doing on a national level and a European level because now they have to keep pointing towards each other, and we are starting a, a law case, a court case against them as well because we want answers.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, I mean, the fact of Europe taking sovereignty away from member states. It's not new. They've been doing that for a very, very long time. New route.
But this is a further click in the ratchet, and it is, if you're to be believed, creating at the European level a regime of illegality. Absolutely. If it was, legal, at least you might, to just about find it bearable. What about, Germany? Are you going to, does it are you aware of any initiatives in Germany, to appeal against the the German Health Authority in the way that they have done for the Netherlands.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Okay. In Germany, I don't know what the situation is about, what my colleagues and, from the AFD Yeah. In Berlin are are doing, but I know that they are really very, outspoken and very, proactive on many cases, on many things, and they had many of the scientists there and and medical professionals and so on into house, into Bundestag, and, therefore, I'm I am very confident that they will do the same or have done it. I don't Oh, no.
It's
Speaker 0: Since Germany is obviously
Speaker 2: the situation.
Speaker 0: Germany is one of the places where the mRNA technology was developed. The Pfizer the for the BioNTech Sure.
Speaker 2: But, Yeah. In some, yeah, in some sense, it was it wasn't Germany, but I think it's mostly in, from the US. Right. And mister Malone
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Still He's still the the the original, inventor of it. And even if now the no the Nobel Prize was given to another, a pair of scientists, which is not which is not the old original inventor. But, okay, we will see. It's Germany. It's I think in Germany, we have a big problem about that.
Some people believe in the state very, very strongly, And, therefore, it's a long way to, to collect all the the the persons who are willing to oppose the system. Zafo. I hope I hope for these things that we, from the European level or from the Dutch level, can help them, yeah, to convince them, to be more outspoken, to be more, frankly and and and and confident to to oppose the the government. Psychologically.
Speaker 1: Sorry. I'm so happy that you call this this Nobel
Speaker 3: Prize
Speaker 1: winners Yes. Because that gives an sort of an illusion of, Well, we gave these doctors, the Nobel Prize for medicine, so that must be a good medicine. Yes. I tell you this. These 2 medical doctors themselves warned in 2018
Speaker 0: Yes. Yes. Yes.
Speaker 1: For the adverse effects of mRNA vaccines. They warned themselves. Okay. So let's get rid of this idea that it's that Because they have the Nobel Prize, it's safe. It's not.
Speaker 0: Well, the Nobel Peace Prize, as we've known, those of us who are interested in foreign policy know that it's deeply politicized and has been for a long time. Yeah. And now we see that that's happening in the medical arena as well. Marcel de Gaf, Willem Engel Joachim Kuz. Thank you very much indeed, and thanks for watching.
Goodbye.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
NZ Politician Calls for Full-Blown Criminal Investigation into COVID Vaccine Deaths. Will #JacindaArdern face prosecution for mass deaths in #NewZealand ? It’s possible as they lose power and protection. Go to twc.health/jimferguson and use CODE:JIM10 https://vigilantnews.com/post/nz-politician-calls-for-full-blown-criminal-investigation-into-covid-vaccine-deaths
NZ Politician Calls for Full-Blown Criminal Investigation into COVID Vaccine Deaths
“On one day, 30 people were jabbed on the same day at the same location. All are now deceased.”
vigilantnews.com
@GuntherEagleman - Gunther Eagleman™
The COVID vaccine hoax is falling apart.
reSee.it AI Summary
Slovakia's Prime Minister, Robert Fico, rejects the pandemic treaty and challenges the WHO. He criticizes discrimination against the unvaccinated, censorship, and the Ukrainian war narrative. Fico vows to investigate previous administration's mistakes and human rights abuses. His stance on national sovereignty and exposing corruption worries the global ruling class. Similar movements in Argentina and Holland also threaten established narratives. Four countries, including New Zealand and Estonia, reject the pandemic treaty. Germany's position remains uncertain. The WHO faces mounting challenges.
@RWMaloneMD - Robert W Malone, MD
The next defeat for the WHO. Slovakia also rejects the pandemic treaty. Not only that, Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico is slaughtering all the regime's sacred cows: - Discrimination against unvaccinated people - Ukrainian war - Censorship -WHO In his speech three days ago, he complained about the narrowing corridor of opinions, which #Gottschalk also indicated yesterday: "Anyone who had a forbidden opinion on vaccinations was defamed as a danger to society." According to Fico, the media wrote that “the unvaccinated should die miserably like pigs.” "But today, one study after another confirms the scandalous consequences of mass vaccination with untested and experimental vaccinations." He promises to investigate the mistakes and human rights abuses of the previous administration, which lands him at the WHO. "As Prime Minister, I promise that my SMER party will reject expanded powers for the WHO at the expense of national sovereignty. He also criticizes the narrative regarding the Ukraine war: "Anyone who advocates that it would be better to negotiate for peace for years instead of letting Slavs kill each other just to weaken Russia is immediately considered a Kremlin agent. Today it is considered politically incorrect to say what everyone knows: that a large part financial and military aid to Ukraine ends up in corrupt hands." -------------------------- Now you know why the usual suspects were so nervous when Fico became Slovakia's prime minister. Why are they so nervous that Milei won in Argentina and Wilders won in Holland? Consider that Fico is left-wing, Wilders is right-wing, and Milei is libertarian. What unites them is that they endanger the big lies of a global ruling class. The left-right schema has had its day. Things like the WHO, censorship, CBDCs, warmongering and Assange are much better differentiators. Things aren't looking good for the WHO either. There are now four countries that are rejecting the pandemic treaty -- New Zealand -- Slovakia -- Estonia -- Slovenia When will Germany finally follow suit?
reSee.it AI Summary
Slovakia's newly elected Prime Minister, Robert Fico, criticized the consequences of mass vaccination with untested experimental vaccines in a speech on November 19, 2023. He also opposes expanding the World Health Organization's authority. Fico expressed concerns about the media, NGOs, and progressive forces pushing their agenda, suppressing differing opinions on COVID vaccination. He plans to investigate the government's actions during the pandemic and rejects the idea of compulsory vaccination. Fico believes that pharmaceutical companies are behind the push for mandatory vaccination and doubts that the Slovak political parties will support strengthening the WHO's powers.
@_aussie17 - aussie17
🚨🚨🚨🚨 During a speech on November 19, 2023, Slovakia's newly elected Prime Minister Robert Fico condemned what he called the consequences of mass vaccination with untested experimental vaccines! He will also be rejecting expansion of the World Health Organization's authority! -------------------------------------------- In the elections, the people simply rejected a smaller new concept by the media, non-governmental organizations and, unfortunately, by the force of pushing of progressivism, gender ideology, free market and deadly enmity against anyone who has a different opinion than they should. If someone had a different opinion about covid vaccination, they were dangerous to society. The media covered the opening, you remember, and now I quote that everyone unvaccinated should squeal in pain like a pig. It is also necessary to use force if someone rejects the policy of excommunication. And today it appears that our free view on vaccination and government measures in the fight against covid, which grossly violates human rights, was correct and justified. One study after another confirms the scandalous consequences of mass vaccination with untested experimental vaccines. Yes, I confirm as party leader and as prime minister that I will support the efforts of some politicians of the new government coalition to politically assess what the government was up to in 2020 to 2021 and look at the financial side of extensive, often completely meaningless purchases medical devices and vaccines. I also declare very clearly that the direction of Slovak social democracy will not support the strengthening of WHO's powers at the expense of sovereign states in managing the war against the pandemic. I will say that only unscrupulous pharmaceutical companies could come up with such nonsense, which began to perceive the resistance of some governments against compulsory vaccination. Under the Constitution of the Slovak Republic, the validity of such international agreements in favor of the WHO requires the approval of the National Council of the Slovak Republic. And I do not believe that the sovereign Slovak political parties will express such approval and certainly not his MPs. ---------------------------------------------
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
The #EU has declared the #Covid19 Vaccines were approved illegally. Accountability is inevitable. #WeThePeople are not letting up. ✅ https://t.co/3415mHkmbl
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, John Loughlin, director of FVD International, discusses a letter written by Marcel de Graaf, Joachim Koos, and other members of the European Parliament to the European Medical Agency (EMA). The letter raises concerns about the procedures followed and the alleged harmful nature of COVID vaccines. The speakers highlight issues such as the lack of transparency in vaccine contracts, the differences between approved and administered batches, and the potential dangers of the vaccines. They also discuss the corruption and illegality surrounding the approval process and the suppression of text messages by Ursula von der Leyen. The speakers emphasize the need for accountability and the protection of citizens' safety.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, hello, everybody. I'm John Loughlin, director of FVD International, Forum For Democracy International. We're in the European Parliament today. I'm delighted to welcome, as my guest today, Marcel de Graaf, member of the European Parliament for Forum For Democracy, Joachim Koos, member of the European Parliament for Alternative fur Deutschland, Anvila Engel, who is a campaigner, and, chairman or or president of Virus Truth, Virus Varheit, which is a a pressure group that campaigns on, on the issue of vaccines and COVID related policies. We are discussing today the letter which, Marcel De Graaf, Joachim Koos, and other members of the European Parliament have written to the European Medical Agency.
In this letter, which is a 20 page document or so, very densely argued and which I encourage, our viewers to read. You can find it on Marcel Dehaaf's website and also there's a link to it, from FED international.com. There are a number of, arguments made in favor of this appeal to withdraw the vaccines. Some of the arguments concern procedures, procedures which were either not followed or which were deliberately violated or changed in advance. Other arguments concern, the use to which the vaccines have been put allegedly, wrongly.
There are also arguments concerning the the harmful nature of the vaccines, and even, arguments, concerning alleged, a confusion between the, batches which were used for testing and the batches which were actually used, on people. Marcel, among all these arguments, perhaps you'd like to tell our our our viewers, what you what has what has brought you to do this this letter. And what are the most important points, do you think?
Speaker 1: Yes. Well, to start with, and that's why William Engel is here, I I got I, got a copy of the letter that Wilhelm sent to, the Dutch, medical agency, with a lot of the same, arguments is that we used in that letter because I contacted Willem, and I said, well, we like to use, your letter as a as a concept, to and we had to rework it, of course, because we have a completely different leg legislation for the European Medical Agency as for the Dutch, institute that that, approves medicines. So we had to rework it, but I got this letter, and I was shocked because we already know a lot of things about these COVID vaccines. We know that they are not effective. I mean, If a vaccine is effective, then why got 4 of them or 5 or whatever, because they still, don't work after the first time, which in my time, when I was young, a vaccine would create immunity immediately.
Speaker 0: Well, you made a video about this, sir, not so long ago, you said if we if they were if they worked, you wouldn't need boosters all the time.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So that's pretty good fix. So that we knew that already. I mean and we know that the details on the contracts are not given to the public, so it's all, its secrecy and hidden SMSs and, and money going to places where we don't know it, if it's used well or not taxpayers' money. So we we already had an idea that this this whole thing was Messi and and and and, in some way, corrupted.
But then I got this letter, and it basically said, well, this this approval and the the way we got to this approval is also completely messed up And messed up in a way that really shocked me because if you approve a batch, a certain vaccine or certain medicine. Then you expect that the medicine that is approved is the medicine that is applied to patients or to citizens. And if there's a difference between that, then you are basically being vaccinated with a nonapproved
Speaker 0: with something that wasn't approved.
Speaker 1: Whatever substance. So, Well, that really shocked me, and that that was why
Speaker 2: I was
Speaker 1: so enthusiastic about the action of Filament that I said, well, We need to take this to a much higher level. We need to take this to European level because every European citizen is being exposed to something They shouldn't be at first.
Speaker 0: One of the points that struck me I mean, a number of the arguments are are rather technical. They concern, procedure and so on. But there's one detail that I think anyone can understand, and that is that the, descriptions the official descriptions of these, vaccines run to, respectively, 574 pages and 224 pages. And doctors are supposed to read these 5 well, I've thousands of pages, to decide whether or not, to administer these vaccines. Joachim.
Is that for you the most important point? That that struck me as an example of the European Union because this is, tolerated by the European Medical Authority, actually creating illegality. It's actually creating a regime of illegality. It. It's a it's a gigantic machine for generating legislation as we know the European Union.
But here it is creating objectively a system of illegality because no no doctor Has the Time to Read these 500 pages for each medicine that he prescribes. What's what's your what led you to, to to to sign this letter?
Speaker 2: I think, it's many things. As Marshall said, there are so many things which are going really wrong in a in a in a very big scale, so far, it's so, unbelievable what we find. We we look on one aspect, and then you find fort or something else, something really, so hindrances and big, big mountains. You cannot surmount them. Yeah.
You cannot go you must go outside of them and, be beyond them. And, therefore, it's so many things which are clearly stunning and and stunningly. It began at the beginning as it was in the 1st year when when when the things, went, wrong. And, it doesn't it didn't change. And I, as a member of the parliament in, in the committee of budget and budgetary control.
I was very much involved with money. It's a money issue, you know, and it went wrong so so wrong for me as a as a as a very frugal person who thinks, you must pay for all things, and now they have Yeah. Billions of billions of euros throwing to the to the, the pharmaceutical firms about money about things which are not women which are not safe and which are, say, safe for themselves, say, we cannot, we cannot say it's safe. Yeah? And that was for me, it was an an enlightenment when when the the one of the the directors of Pfizer told the committee who is was looking into it that you that you said we didn't know it.
Yeah. And and and, therefore, We have no, proof that it is safe.
Speaker 0: That's right. That's right.
Speaker 2: So so so insane, and, therefore, I was very alert, and I spoke a lot about Sissingh and about, vaccination. And and at last, I was a little bit annoyed about, our president, Metzler, Then she wrote letter after letter that we should be vaccinated again.
Speaker 0: Yes. Yes.
Speaker 2: It's it's therefore, except for me, thinking And we've wrote, to her and said it's not okay. Yeah. We should not be coerced to be vaccinated.
Speaker 0: Well, coercion is the, or at least interference is the key. I mean, I'm very interested in the procedural aspects. I was I was struck as well by the evidence you found. I I imagine you found this villain, that the European Medical Authority tried to accelerate the procedure. In other words, instead of sitting there truly and waiting for providers to come to them and show that their product is safe.
And so so the the these procedural things fascinate me, but I suspect our viewers are more interested in the substantial medical issues. Are they safe, or are they dangerous? You, Claire. They're dangerous.
Speaker 3: They're clearly dangerous, because they did not follow. And one of the procedures that was overlooked or fast tracked, and it's called a major objection, and it has a lot to do with the good manufacturing practice, that says that you have to have the procedure down to the minutiae so you know that the product is always the same wherever you produce it and whenever you produce it. That it was clearly not in order, and that probably has led to the differences between those batches. So some groups of batches have a very high incidence of, of adverse effects, but you do not know beforehand which ones. So the precautionary thing here to do is to say we have to regard all batches as unsafe.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 3: So that's the first thing.
Speaker 0: And you
Speaker 3: cannot change it to say, well, only 4% of the batches is unsafe. So Yeah. That that's an acceptable risk.
Speaker 0: Are the different batches a differently dangerous So
Speaker 3: we're talking about vaccines, erroneously. This is a new platform. It's an mRNA platform, which technically and scientifically and also legally is considered advanced medical therapeut therapeutical products. So in in a sense, it's gene therapy. Yeah.
Now the scale it has been produced has also never been done. The adjuvants that were used has also never been done. So this is a a worldwide experiment. And if you go down to those clinical trials on which the SMPC documents are based. You clearly see that some of them read real world data.
We are the guinea pigs. There's no going, going around it. It's an experimental gene therapeutic, product that was fast tracked, by changing the rules, bending the rules, and trying to cover up those changes in the in the direct directive of 2021 on this the the 24th March. And and what you see there is on every level a little bit of tweaking the process so you get a completely unapproved, completely unsafe product on the market.
Speaker 0: That's the procedural side. Why are they that's it. Basically, you I understand. I we are we understand. But why are they dangerous?
Us. You mentioned myocarditis. You mentioned pericarditis. You mentioned heart disease, particularly affecting, young men, apparently.
Speaker 2: And even even fatalities? Yeah.
Speaker 0: Yeah. So let's let's let's concentrate on the substantial
Speaker 3: Yeah. If we look at the adverse effects Yeah. And and for the record, I was trained as a pharmaceutical scientist, so This is really my field. If you look at the adverse effects, it's very broad, and we've discussed this with with immunologists, effectiologists, also with pathologists, and what they find is that it is because of the choice of the target of the antigen. So the antigen, the spike protein is divided in 2 units, and one of those units is actually toxic.
So when that distributes all around the body in every organ where it's, accumulates, and that can take months months Until your next jab, so you get this inflammation in all these organs. Yes. And that's why we see such a vast array of adverse effects. The most important one is, of course, the vascular system
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 3: Because it goes through the body, and this is one of the things that was missed because it was, unjustly categorized as a vaccine. If it's categorized as an, as a gene therapy, you have to do this distribution studies. In Japan, they did it. That's why we found out that it accumulates in every, adipose tissue. So that's bone marrow.
Well, if it's in bone marrow, that heightens the chance on all kinds of, cancers. If it's, in the arteries that hides the the chance of aneurysms, on Tias
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 3: On, myocardial infarct infarcts. So, we clearly see that not only the target that was chosen, but the platform that was chosen and the delivery, the lipid nanoparticle, which makes it distributable all over the body. We're all very, very ill advised.
Speaker 0: One of the points you make in the what you make in the letter to the EMA, and which I imagine comes from your, your, case against the Dutch Medical Authority. Mhmm. Is that the rules on genetically modified organisms were changed? Is are these vaccines genetically modified organisms, or are they organisms which modify genes? So Are they modified themselves, or do they then modify
Speaker 3: So both of genetics. Both of those actions or mechanisms are in play here. So this letter was only directed towards the injections that are based on the mRNA platform. Normally, When we do gene therapy, we use a viral vector. So AstraZeneca made an injection, which is also gene therapy, but this was specifically focus against mRNA.
Now the argument of the proponents was, well, there is no chance it will shed because it will not replicate. Although there is a batch that actually does the SA self amplifying mRNA, to to to mitigate the the risk concerning normal gene therapeutic, platforms. But what we see now is that it's also contaminated with DNA strands, and these DNA strands actually contain parts of other viruses, the SIMION 40 virus, which is associated, with cancer.
Speaker 0: Perhaps you could explain for us our RNA, DNA. Yeah. So I know it's very basic for you.
Speaker 3: But So so, normally, what you carry as hereditary, molecules that is basically, the program of you, your body, and and your function is is programmed in DNA. It's double trended. It's, not prone to mutation, but to get from there to a function or to a protein, we need an intermediary, and that's RNA. So the whole idea was to hijack the the the signaling system to make your body produce something that is designed in a lab. Yeah.
So the whole idea is a is a great idea, But you have to test whether it's safe. And when you look at genetically modified organisms, there is a regulation 2,000 one slash eighteen for the European Union. This was bypassed in 2020 Yeah. To make it, to make the clinical trials legal
Speaker 0: Sean.
Speaker 3: Because they don't know what ends up in the environment. They don't know the effect on our genes. But looking closer to it, there was an even more important one, the regulation 2019 slash 5, that actually bypassed parliamentary scrutiny and said, okay. All the conditions that are, proposed for, conditional marketing authorization, including the classification of these, biologicals as they're called, so these medicinal products. We hand over to a committee of experts.
Now what they did is they misused that delegation to create a pseudo, legal system, which they then tried to bypass or tried to push through parliament in 2, 2021. So it had the the approval of the European Commission and the European Parliament. In reality, there is no legal approval of any of these injections.
Speaker 0: Marcel. You used the word corrupt or corrupted just now. The procedures have been corrupted.
Speaker 1: Yes. Yes. Because if you have, for for decades, used certain procedures Because you really want to protect, the population and protect patients, from harmful medicines. Then you go through a to a very precise procedure with testing, its scrutiny so that you and really are 100% sure that you end up with a medicine that's safe to use for the specific category of people that you want to use it on. Now if you start changing these procedures to push through something that's experimental, Then you then you can start asking questions.
Where were all these 1,000,000 used for that were paid to fight, sir, Emma Derna? Why are all these officials, who are doing their jobs for for decades in a very decent way, certainly, open to change all these rules and to, bypass all these safety measures because that's what these procedures are for. They are safety measures. They're safe, and they're for our safety.
Speaker 0: Yep.
Speaker 1: That's why these measures are there. And then you put them aside because of some experimental stuff that you, in a in a in a very high speed want to pull through this process to inject into people that something is really, really wrong. That's why I'm using the word corrupted. Yeah. I mean, they they you corrupt the procedures In in this.
Guarantee your safety.
Speaker 0: In the word, corrupted, there is the word corrupt, and there is the allegation, is there not, that Ursula von der Leyen suppressed her text messages, with the head of Pfizer, if I'm not mistaken. Would you like to, tell us where we are on that. Have they been released, these text messages? Have they disappeared? And and and and, most specifically, is it corruption, not just corrupted.
Speaker 2: That must, a a judge, a court, must decide on that, and therefore But the political action
Speaker 0: can be made. Yeah.
Speaker 2: You are sure. But, Stefan Vivi Vivid for such, EPPO, the prosecutor office in, Luxembourg will Ko On. And with this case, because, also, if there has there a case, still open and to many cases as I as I heard? And but we didn't hear anything about the ongoing of this, this investigation. And, therefore, I am as a political and as an MVP, I am sure There will be no result Yes.
Even not not before the election next year. Yes. And when she when therefore, it's it's only for from to to to to to feel so people feel safe. All the thing all things are working. All systems are working and so on.
But they are all working together in the some sense about and and it's corruption in in the political sense. In the political sense. Really corruption. I'm sure. And it began for me, it began with the origin of SARS CoV 2.
The the origin of SARS CoV 2, I think, is the biggest Ford, the biggest, the
Speaker 0: You mean, you mean, the lab? The the lab here. The lab
Speaker 2: here. Things. Yeah. It's it's really the biggest cover up in in medical history. Yeah.
What what are they doing there? And therefore, it began with a with reports, the system, And it goes on with a corrupt, solution. It's a solution which we which we didn't need. Yeah. And if we we are going on and on and on with with such with such things which we don't need, I was never vaccinated about Vipsis, mRNA technologies, and I'm happy about that.
And I think we the solution will be most more people must see also that things are really deteriorating ratings. They are going wrong and wrong and and and and worse and worse, and then they will wake up. And then they will say, no. Never never more anymore, vaccination, and that will be a good, a good Hussarld for
Speaker 0: one of the purposes, of course, of the yeah.
Speaker 1: Vinam said something, something else which, comes close to what, Joachim Hussain. It is a conditional approval, and then you prolong the approval.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: What you see with this, all these institutions is that they cover each other.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: They're covering, 4 von der Leyen's, SMSes. They're covering for this conditional approval. Now we get this prolongation.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: It was addressed by Willem in the Netherlands. How can you prolong a conditional approval. If you have all these data about adverse effects, the same question that we were asking, at the EMA, The answer to Willem is, well, you have to go to the EMA. You don't you can't ask us because we just are just doing what Europe is asking from us.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And that's why you've and that's why you've addressed this letter to the EMA.
Speaker 1: Are responsible in the Netherlands for the the safety of the Dutch people Yeah. And the EMA for the European people. So you see, they're pointing to each other, and how do you respond to it? It's and that is also part of this network of covering each other.
Speaker 0: Well, Willem, you were yourself, I believe, arrested
Speaker 3: Four times already.
Speaker 0: Four times. Tell us about that.
Speaker 3: The the Peel case, is continuing. It's What
Speaker 0: were you arrested for?
Speaker 3: For well, the alleged thing is that I have incited Yeah. People to break the law by going to a protest
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 3: Which already is, dictatorial Yeah. On itself, if you do not allow people to call for a protest.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 3: It's a ridiculous case. Unbelievable. But even in Germany democracy. The In Germany, it's even worse because Michael Baldeck, which organized a lot of protests, he was in prison in the pretrial prison for 9 months, and now they have dropped the case. So they locked up an innocent guy for 9 months.
Speaker 2: Because of alleged fraud. Yeah. Not not because of, participation at an,
Speaker 3: in the rally. Yeah. And and this liberal values. And yes. But but this gaslighting, Ting because I want to allude to the point of, Marcel.
What we see here in this case of the injections and the whole COVID case, you could say, This is an usurping of power by the European Commission. By try trying to circumvent parliament, by trying to create pseudo laws, their, now usurping the power of health. The whole EU for health program, which is based on the one health ideology, is really scary. If we look to the WHO treaty, this is an exponent of what's actually happening here in this house or next door at the commission. So by trying to answer this letter that we wrote to the Dutch version of the EMA, And their answer was telling they said, well, we do not have the authority.
You have to go to Europe Yeah. Which is untrue. In all this European legislation, it clearly states that the end, result or the the the person that is ultimately responsible is the sovereign state itself, and that is a thing that is very worrisome. That with this COVID narrative, The sovereignty is taken away from the states even more.
Speaker 1: Yep.
Speaker 3: And and that's why I'm so happy that Now we have a pincher movement in that in that sense that we're doing on a national level and a European level because now they have to keep pointing towards each other, and we are starting a, a law case, a court case against them as well because we want answers.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, I mean, the fact of Europe taking sovereignty away from member states. It's not new. They've been doing that for a very, very long time. New route.
But this is a further click in the ratchet, and it is, if you're to be believed, creating at the European level a regime of illegality. Absolutely. If it was, legal, at least you might, to just about find it bearable. What about, Germany? Are you going to, does it are you aware of any initiatives in Germany, to appeal against the the German Health Authority in the way that they have done for the Netherlands.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Okay. In Germany, I don't know what the situation is about, what my colleagues and, from the AFD Yeah. In Berlin are are doing, but I know that they are really very, outspoken and very, proactive on many cases, on many things, and they had many of the scientists there and and medical professionals and so on into house, into Bundestag, and, therefore, I'm I am very confident that they will do the same or have done it. I don't Oh, no.
It's
Speaker 0: Since Germany is obviously
Speaker 2: the situation.
Speaker 0: Germany is one of the places where the mRNA technology was developed. The Pfizer the for the BioNTech Sure.
Speaker 2: But, Yeah. In some, yeah, in some sense, it was it wasn't Germany, but I think it's mostly in, from the US. Right. And mister Malone
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Still He's still the the the original, inventor of it. And even if now the no the Nobel Prize was given to another, a pair of scientists, which is not which is not the old original inventor. But, okay, we will see. It's Germany. It's I think in Germany, we have a big problem about that.
Some people believe in the state very, very strongly, And, therefore, it's a long way to, to collect all the the the persons who are willing to oppose the system. Zafo. I hope I hope for these things that we, from the European level or from the Dutch level, can help them, yeah, to convince them, to be more outspoken, to be more, frankly and and and and confident to to oppose the the government. Psychologically.
Speaker 1: Sorry. I'm so happy that you call this this Nobel
Speaker 3: Prize
Speaker 1: winners Yes. Because that gives an sort of an illusion of, Well, we gave these doctors, the Nobel Prize for medicine, so that must be a good medicine. Yes. I tell you this. These 2 medical doctors themselves warned in 2018
Speaker 0: Yes. Yes. Yes.
Speaker 1: For the adverse effects of mRNA vaccines. They warned themselves. Okay. So let's get rid of this idea that it's that Because they have the Nobel Prize, it's safe. It's not.
Speaker 0: Well, the Nobel Peace Prize, as we've known, those of us who are interested in foreign policy know that it's deeply politicized and has been for a long time. Yeah. And now we see that that's happening in the medical arena as well. Marcel de Gaf, Willem Engel Joachim Kuz. Thank you very much indeed, and thanks for watching.
Goodbye.
reSee.it AI Summary
Slovakia's Prime Minister, Robert Fico, has made headlines by rejecting the signing of the WHO Pandemic Treaty. He boldly criticized the treaty as "nonsense invented by greedy pharma companies" and raised concerns about the consequences of mass vaccination with experimental vaccines. This unexpected move is seen as a significant step towards challenging the influence of the pharmaceutical industry and globalist institutions like the WHO. It is expected to trigger a chain reaction of events. Video via @_aussie17.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Slovakia Shocks the World: New Prime Minister Rejects Signing the WHO Pandemic Treaty Prime Minister Robert Fico calls the WHO Pandemic Treaty "nonsense invented by greedy pharma companies." He also said, “One study after another confirms the scandalous consequences of mass vaccination with untested experimental vaccines.” There is no other head of state in the world who has had the guts to say this publicly and so explicitly. Slovakia is leading the world out of the dark ages of biological warfare by the pharmaceutical industry and globalist institutions like the WHO, in a move that is seen as completely unexpected. This move will set off a chain reaction of events… Video via @_aussie17 This post was a condensed version of an article written by @MakisMD (give him a follow). Read the full translation of PM Fico's speech in the comment below:
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
ARTICLE: Slovakia Shocks the World - New Prime Minister Rejects Signing the WHO Pandemic Treaty https://vigilantnews.com/post/slovakia-shocks-the-world-new-prime-minister-rejects-signing-the-who-pandemic-treaty
.png)
Slovakia Shocks the World: New Prime Minister Rejects Signing the WHO Pandemic Treaty
This move will set off a chain reaction of events…
vigilantnews.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Slovakia's new Prime Minister refuses to sign the WHO pandemic treaty, calling it an "absurdity invented by greedy pharmaceutical companies." The citizens rejected media, NGOs, and foreign powers imposing minority concepts like progressivism, gender ideology, and free market hostility. The government's violation of human rights in COVID measures is now proven. Studies confirm scandalous consequences of experimental mass vaccination. The new coalition government aims to evaluate previous government actions and investigate questionable purchases of medical devices and vaccines. The ruling party opposes granting more power to the WHO over sovereign health management.
@BlackBondPtv - Black Bond PTV
La Slovaquie choque le monde : Le nouveau Premier ministre refuse de signer le traité de l'OMS sur les pandémies Le Premier ministre Robert Fico qualifie le traité de l'OMS sur les pandémies d'"absurdité inventée par des sociétés pharmaceutiques avides". Lors des élections, les citoyens ont simplement rejeté les médias, les organisations non gouvernementales et, malheureusement, les puissances étrangères qui ont imposé le concept minoritaire du progressisme, de l'idéologie du genre, du marché libre et de l'hostilité mortelle à l'égard de toute personne ayant une opinion différente de celle qu'ils devraient avoir. Si quelqu'un avait une opinion différente sur la vaccination contre le COVID-19, il était "dangereux pour la société". Les médias ont ouvertement écrit, comme vous vous en souvenez tous, et je les cite à l'instant : "que toute personne non vaccinée devrait hurler de douleur comme un porc. Il est nécessaire d'utiliser la force si quelqu'un rejette la politique de l'aiguille" Et aujourd'hui, il est démontré que notre point de vue libre sur la vaccination et les mesures gouvernementales dans la lutte contre le COVID, qui a grossièrement violé les droits de l'homme, était correct et justifié. Une étude après l'autre confirme les conséquences scandaleuses de la vaccination de masse avec des vaccins expérimentaux non testés. Oui, je confirme en tant que chef du parti et je confirme en tant que chef du gouvernement que je soutiendrai les efforts de certains politiciens de la nouvelle coalition gouvernementale pour évaluer politiquement ce que le gouvernement précédent de 2020 à 2021 a fait, et aussi pour examiner l'aspect financier des achats importants, souvent complètement absurdes, d'appareils médicaux et de vaccins. De même, je déclare très clairement que la social-démocratie slovaque SMER (le parti politique au pouvoir) ne soutiendra PAS le renforcement des pouvoirs de l'Organisation mondiale de la santé aux dépens des États souverains en matière de gestion de la santé. vigilantnews.com/post/slovakia-…
reSee.it AI Summary
There is evidence suggesting that Italian Health Minister Roberto Speranza may have concealed deaths and side effects related to COVID-19 vaccinations. This has led to an investigation into his actions.
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
This is true. Don’t tell me nothing is happening. Get in the fight or get lost‼️ This leader is Italian Health Minister Roberto Speranza, and he is now under investigation for homicide after emails reveal that from the very start of the vaccinations, he knew the shots were killing people and gave orders to local health authorities to conceal deaths and serious side effects in order to reassure Italian citizens of their safety and to not jeopardize the vaccination campaign.
reSee.it AI Summary
Italian Health Minister Roberto Speranza is under investigation for allegedly concealing COVID-19 vaccine deaths. Emails revealed that Speranza knew about the dangers of the vaccines but instructed local health authorities to hide deaths and side effects. The investigation includes the former director of the Italian Medicines Agency. Other posts discuss Tucker Carlson's explanation of the COVID-19 situation, Robert Kennedy Jr.'s uncovering of COVID cover-up villains, and Dr. Paul Marik exposing a medical hoax. Additionally, there is information on being prepared for the "next pandemic" and an episode of Media Blackout discussing various news stories.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Italian Health Minister Under Investigation for Murder for Concealing COVID-19 Vaccine Deaths “Former Italian Health Minister Roberto Speranza is under investigation for homicide after emails reveal that from the very start of the vaccinations, he knew the shots were killing people and gave orders to local health authorities to conceal deaths and serious side effects in order to reassure Italian citizens of their safety and to not jeopardize the vaccination campaign,” reported @InfoWars contributor @gregreese. These staggering accusations were been reported on by both a German and Italian news network. Reese provided an English translation of those broadcasts: The Rome Public Prosecutor's office is investigating Roberto Speranza, the Italian government's Health Minister, during the time of COVID measures. He was responsible for the vaccination campaign. The investigations are the result of complaints related to the so-called AIFA emails from the Italian Medicines Agency. The former director of AIFA, Nicola Magrini, is also under investigation. The publication of these internal emails revealed that they had been aware of the dangers of the COVID vaccination from the start. The accusation is that the responsible minister and the head of the drug authority knowingly and deliberately exposed the unsuspecting Italian population to this risk. Yes, they encouraged Italians to get vaccinated. Vaccination was even made mandatory for certain professional groups. Consequently, many side effects, including fatal ones, came to light. The investigations are for murder, serious bodily harm, and more because Speranza and Magrini evidently gave instructions to the local health authorities to conceal the deaths and serious side effects that occurred immediately after the vaccinations began in order not to jeopardize the vaccination campaign — and to reassure the citizens about their safety. The responsible minister and the head of AIFA are now expected to answer for these actions. According to the complaints from the police unions and the financial police, as well as from the private organization, "Listen to Me," which represents 4,200 people damaged by vaccines in Italy, police officers and teachers were subjected to mandatory COVID vaccination. Here is the former Health Minister, Roberto Speranza, proudly announcing vaccination statistics in Italy. “We have now reached a massively significant percentage of vaccinated people in Italy, 89.41%. Therefore, currently in Italy, just over 10% of the population remains unvaccinated.” Well, today, Roberto Speranza is under investigation for lies he allegedly told about vaccines. Among the crimes he is accused of are ideological falsehood and murder. Look, this is the document we are showing you tonight, exclusively. It states the former minister, Roberto Speranza, along with Nicola Magrini, the former general manager of AIFA, are both registered in the investigative records of the Rome Prosecutor's Office.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Former Italian health minister Roberto Speranza is being investigated for homicide after allegedly concealing COVID-19 vaccine deaths. Emails revealed that Speranza knew about the fatalities and instructed local health authorities to hide them in order to maintain public confidence in the vaccination campaign. The investigation also involves Niccolo Magrini, the former director of the Italian Medicines Agency. The accusations claim that both officials knowingly exposed the Italian population to risks associated with the vaccine. Additionally, the Philippine House of Representatives initiated an inquiry into unexplained deaths, but it was hindered by a powerful earthquake. The global anti-system movement seeks accountability for those who have caused harm. A medical emergency kit by The Wellness Company, featuring life-saving medications, is promoted as a means of preparedness.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: An Italian health minister is under investigation for murder for concealing COVID nineteen vaccine deaths. Quote, he knew the shots were killing people and gave orders to local health authorities to conceal deaths and serious side effects, end quote. Former Italian health minister Roberto Speranza is under investigation for homicide after emails reveal that from the very start of the vaccinations, He knew the shots were killing people and gave orders to local health authorities to conceal deaths and serious side effects in order to reassure Italian citizens of their safety and to not jeopardize the vaccination campaign. This was reported on Infowars by Greg deaths. These staggering accusations were being reported on by both a German and Italian news Network, Gregorice has actually provided an English translation to this report, and I wanna play some of that now.
Speaker 1: The Rome public prosecutor's office is investigating Roberto Speranza, the Italian government's health minister during the time of COVID measures. He was responsible for the vaccination campaign. The investigations are the result of complaints related to the so called IFA emails From the Italian Medicines Agency, the former director of IFA, Niccolo Magrini, is also under investigation. The publication of these internal emails revealed that they had been aware of the dangers of the COVID vaccination from the start. The accusation is that the responsible minister and the head of the drug authority knowingly and deliberately exposed the unsuspecting Italian population to this risk.
Yes. They encouraged Italians to get vaccinated. Vaccination was even made mandatory for certain professional groups. Consequently, many side effects, including fatal ones, came to light. The investigations are for murder, serious bodily harm, and more because Speranza and Magrini Evidently gave instructions to the local health authorities to conceal the deaths and serious side effects that occurred Immediately after the vaccinations began, in order not to jeopardize the vaccination campaign and to reassure the citizens about their safety.
Speaker 0: Now Rees also added that recently, the Philippine House of Representatives voted to conduct an investigation into the mysterious surge in unexplained deaths numbering over 260,000 in 2021 and around 67,000 in 2022. However, it seems that the government inquiry into shocking unexplained deaths has been hampered after the country experienced a powerful 7.6 magnitude earthquake, that entire article is available on the vigilant news network. The cat is definitely, undoubtedly out of the bag that these globalists self proclaimed elites want to harm us, And the so called anti system movement as Klaus Schwab puts it, really just is a pro humanity movement. And it's been joined by people from all over the world from all backgrounds, all socioeconomic statuses, all education levels, and all countries. Accountability is coming whether those who have harmed us, like it or not.
And now a message from our sponsor, The Wellness Company. Everyone knows the next medical crisis is just around the corner. Whether it comes in the form of a pandemic or something much more mundane like a tick bite, You and your family need to be prepared. That's where the wellness company comes in. The wellness company and their doctors are medical professionals that you can trust And their new medical emergency kits are the gold standard when it comes to keeping you safe and healthy.
Be ready for anything. This medical emergency kit contains an assortment of life Life saving medications including Ivermectin and Z PAK. The medical emergency kit provides a guidebook to aid in the safe use of all of these life saving medications. From anthrax to tick bites to COVID and even to a bioweapon like the plague, the wellness company's medical emergency kit is exactly what you need to have on hand To be prepared, rest assured knowing that you have emergency antibiotics, antivirals, and antiparasitics on hand to keep you and your family safe. Go to twc.healthforward/blackouttoday and order.
That's twc.health Forward slash blackout and use the promo code blackout to save 10%.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Related Stories from @VigilantNews: Tucker Carlson explains why you’ll never get an apology for what happened during COVID. https://vigilantnews.com/post/tucker-carlson-explains-why-youll-never-get-an-apology-for-what-happened-during-covid/
Tucker Carlson Explains Why You’ll Never Get an Apology for What Happened During COVID
In the opening monologue of episode 45 of Tucker on X, Carlson delved into the theme of acknowledging and taking responsibility for one’s wrongdoings. Tucker Carlson Explains Why You'll Never Get an Apology for What Happened During COVID"If I forced you to take a vax that didn't work that very well might have hurt you, I “If I admitted it, I’d have to suffer the consequences.”
vigilantnews.com
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@VigilantNews Robert Kennedy Jr. unmasks the ‘principal villains’ behind the COVID cover-up. https://vigilantnews.com/post/robert-kennedy-jr-unmasks-the-principal-villains-behind-the-covid-cover-up/
Robert Kennedy Jr. Unmasks the ‘Principal Villains’ Behind the COVID Cover-Up
According to the CDC, the COVID-19 pandemic has claimed the lives of over 1.15 million Americans. However, after nearly four years of death and economic carnage, there’s been an underwhelming effort to get to the bottom of where it originated, so this may never happen again. Independent presidential candidate Robert Kennedy Jr. attests that COVID-19
vigilantnews.com
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@VigilantNews Dr. Paul Marik exposes the ‘biggest hoax’ in medicine outside of COVID. https://vigilantnews.com/post/dr-paul-marik-exposes-the-biggest-hoax-in-medicine-outside-of-covid/
Dr. Paul Marik Exposes the ‘Biggest Hoax’ in Medicine Outside of COVID
“The medical system will kill you.” “The medical system will kill you.”
vigilantnews.com
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@VigilantNews The ‘next pandemic’: what you need to do to be ready. https://vigilantnews.com/post/the-next-pandemic-what-you-need-to-do-to-be-ready
The ‘Next Pandemic’: What You Need to Do to Be Ready
“You’ve seen all the threats from the establishment suggesting that there’s not going to be drug availability in the not-too-distant future ... So, look at that and protect yourselves.”
vigilantnews.com
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@VigilantNews Watch the latest episode of Media Blackout with @Zeee_Media in the post below: https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1737246493264826586?s=20
reSee.it AI Summary
The delayed Covid vaccine inquiry, originally scheduled for this summer, raises concerns about government transparency and accountability. The postponement aligns with the upcoming General Election, sparking suspicion of motives. The government took less time to develop and approve vaccines than it is taking to start the investigation, suggesting an attempt to avoid scrutiny and accountability. This delay could keep the public in the dark and shield politicians from electoral backlash. #Covid #VaccineInquiry
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1685212051675754496?s=20 Delayed Justice: Covid Vaccine Inquiry Postponed, Raising Suspicions of Government Evasion Ahead of Elections The delayed commencement of the 'Covid vaccine inquiry', initially slated for this summer, raises serious concerns about the transparency and accountability of the government, especially in the context of globalism and politicians like Sunak. The postponement, as reported by the BBC, strategically aligns with the timeline of the upcoming General Election, sparking suspicion about the motives behind this deferment. This delay is particularly alarming given the rapid pace at which COVID-19 vaccines were developed, tested, and approved. It took approximately 11 months for vaccines like the U.K.'s own AstraZeneca to go from development to approval. In stark contrast, the government is taking longer than this entire process to even start the Covid vaccine investigation. Such procrastination is indicative of a possible attempt by the government and globalist politicians to avoid public scrutiny and accountability before the election. The public deserves answers about the vaccine development process, and this delay could be seen as a tactic to keep them in the dark, potentially shielding politicians from electoral backlash. Join us http://freedomtraininternational.org #Covid #mRNA #Pfizer #Modenra #VaccineInjuries #SuddenDeaths #DiedSuddenly #WEF #WEF2030Agenda #DepopulationAgenda #FreedomTrainInternational #GlobalResistance #CovidInquiry https://dailysceptic.org/2024/01/11/u-k-covid-vaccine-investigation-unexpectedly-postponed-until-after-general-election/
New landing page – Inspiration Station
freedomtraininternational.org
U.K. Covid Vaccine Investigation "Unexpectedly" Postponed "Until After General Election" – The Daily Sceptic
The long-awaited U.K. 'Covid vaccine inquiry' has been postponed until "after the General Election" for mysterious reasons. Are some people getting worried?
dailysceptic.org
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
British PM and #WEF2030Agenda devotee #Sunak invested $500 million of his private funds into Moderna through a company called Thelema Partners in a notorious tax haven in the Caymen Islands. Afterwards he stated in parliament that the vaccine was "safe and effective" while then going on to roll out further permissions for Moderna to set up further vaccine producing interests within the UK. Did he use his position as Prime Minister to make massive personal profits while knowingly or even unknowingly causing harm to the British people and has he broken the National Security Act which states "if you're working in secret for a foreign power to use or abuse your knowledge in a way that causes harm to our citizens you will be a criminal." Former Head of MI6 Sir Alex Younger.@Official_MI5@GBNEWS @altbright Read Article Here ⬇️ https://dailysceptic.org/2023/07/29/mrna-covid-jabs-have-caused-silent-heart-damage-to-tens-of-millions-of-people-shocking-new-study-suggests/
mRNA Covid Jabs Have Caused Silent Heart Damage to Tens of Millions of People, According to a Shocking New Study – The Daily Sceptic
Moderna’s Covid booster caused one in 35 people to have heart injuries detectable with blood tests, according to a new Swiss doctors’ report.
dailysceptic.org
reSee.it AI Summary
Slovakia's Prime Minister, Robert Fico, has announced an inquiry into the handling of the Covid-19 pandemic. Fico criticized previous governments for prioritizing pharmaceutical interests and accused them of profiting from unnecessary purchases of medical supplies and vaccines. He also raised concerns about vaccine-related cardiovascular deaths and called out public officials for ignoring the issue.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
MASSIVE DEVELOPMENT: Slovakia’s Prime Minister Announces Inquiry into the “Covid Circus” and the Vaccines “We will publish and tell the Slovak public what really happened during this Covid period,” declared PM Robert Fico. He accused the previous governments of prioritizing pharma’s interest over the public’s: “They made a lot of money from unnecessary purchases of various medical supplies and vaccines.” Furthermore, Fico confronted public officials, accusing them of turning a blind eye to vaccine-related cardiovascular deaths.
reSee.it AI Summary
South Korea is facing backlash over the Covid vaccines, with families of victims claiming the government downplayed side effects and forced the vaccine on the public. Now, they are seeking accountability from Big Pharma and the government for the fallout.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
🚨🇰🇷💉 South Korea - Covid Vaccines “No one has suffered more than the families of victims who died or were injured from the Covid Vaccines” “The Government downplayed the side effects” “The vaccine was forced on the public” Now the South Koreans are going after Big Pharma & Government following Covid Vaccine vaccine fall out. They didn’t really expect to kill & injured millions of people & get away with it did they?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Despite the daily confirmation of 17,000 cases, the effectiveness of the vaccine was deemed ineffective, leading to the discontinuation of vaccine passes. However, starting on February 16, 2021, without ensuring safety, mandatory vaccinations were enforced on priority groups and citizens, resulting in numerous vaccine-related deaths and severe injuries. The focus was solely on the benefits of vaccination while downplaying the side effects, causing more harm.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 했음에도 불구하고, 일일 확진자가 십 칠 만 명을 발생하여 백신의 유효성이 없어 백신 패스는 폐지되었다. 그럼에도 불구하고 안전성이 확보되지 않은 백신을 이 천 이 십 일 년 이 월 이 십 육 일부터 코로나 백신 우선 접종 대상자 및 국민에게 선택의 여지 없이 접종 강요를 하여 다수의 백신 사망자 및 중증 피해자가 발생하였는데도 백신 부작용에 대해서는 모르세요 하고 접종의 효과만 부각하여 피해를 더 키웠다.
@SaiKate108 - Kat A 🌸
The Australian Parliament will be faced with some hard truths as Dr Aseem Malhotra makes submissions to the Excess Deaths Inquiry. The doctor who proved we would be better off if we never had the vaccine as it would have caused less harm!! https://t.co/7iWQRLyhEA
Video Transcript AI Summary
People wrongly believe rare side effects of vaccines are acceptable due to a false perception of benefits. COVID mutations, not vaccines, led to milder cases. Original trials showed vaccines were more harmful than the virus itself. AstraZeneca had significant adverse effects, not as rare as reported. Overall, vaccines had a negative impact on society and health.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: An element of people almost accepting to some degree that these side effects which they wrongly believe are rare is acceptable is because they also have a false perception of benefit of the vaccine. So one of the discussions I've had with even doctors who are not in normal circumstances good critical thinkers Hold on a minute, Asim. Haven't we ended the pandemic because of the vaccine? How about all these lives that are saved? How come COVID is not, you know, it's not killing people anymore?
No. COVID mutated independent of the vaccine. It's become milder. That's what happens to these viruses. You can take the vaccine out and somebody asked me the question the other day.
If we didn't have the population. Okay. Big statement. And why? The what is the data that supports this?
We go back to the very basics of the original randomized controlled trial. The vaccine showed you were more likely to have a serious and this is in a healthier subgroup population which were chosen by Pfizer and Moderna. You were more likely to suffer a serious adverse event from the vaccine to be hospitalized with COVID. And that is during the original ancestral Wuhan strain. Think about that.
You've got the it was still more harmful. The the the virus has mutated to become less harmful and you've still got the same level of harm with the vaccine. It's a no brainer. I mean, I think it's a that you can make a very strong case that we would societies would have been much better off without this mRNA technology. AstraZeneca.
I mean that was in effect suspended in the UK. Even though it wasn't made public they kind of slowly phased it out. But when you look at the yellow card reporting and this is in a country of a population of 60,000,000. We had 1,000,000 yellow card reports from AstraZeneca which is just extraordinary. And it was publicized in news reports of a rare clotting effect or a rare issue.
We know now it wasn't rare at all. So I think these vaccines have had a hugely negative impact on society, on health and of course the whole everything that's gone win it.
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe everyone has committed crimes, and the truth will eventually come to light. This situation feels like a large-scale experiment on humanity. As the consequences unfold, those in power will find it increasingly difficult to escape accountability.
@wolsned - Darren of Plymouth 🇬🇧
“You have all committed crimes. It will collapse, because the truth will surface. This has been a large scale experiment of gain of function on the human population. This will be recorded in history for many many generations to come” Geert Van Den Bosche on COVID vaccines. The truth always outs in the end, but this time, as the bodies pile up, it will leave the criminals in power no place to hide.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Many individuals recognize their mistakes but feel they cannot admit them due to fear of backlash. They hope for distractions from the issues at hand, but those distractions are unlikely to come. This group, feeling protected by their numbers, resembles a mafia, believing that their collective strength shields them from accountability. However, the truth will eventually emerge, leading to a collapse of their facade. This situation represents a significant experiment on humanity that will be remembered for generations, far surpassing the discussions following World Wars I and II.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If these people would now go out and say, oh, wait a minute, yeah, we have been making some mistakes, it wasn't all right, we have to correct them and we have to revise our opinion, these people would be stoned in the street, right? They have no choice they have no choice than other than to stick even if they completely see how wrong they have been. They have no other choice. They can only hope that something will happen that will distract from this issue, that will distract it, but it won't. It won't.
And so they keep silent or they just continue, you know, along the path that they have been walking along so far. But, I can tell you that many of them must be desperate that, you know, being together, they feel protected, you know. This is a big lobby. This is a big lobby and they think that everybody thinks that the other will protect them, right, which is not the case, but this is this typically this typical feeling. You all have committed crimes, but you are a big group and it's like the mafia and you feel altogether, you feel like a big team and nobody can penetrate into the team, etcetera.
It will collapse because the surface the the the truth will surface. This has been a large scale experiment of gain of function on the very human population. This is something that, you know, will be reported in history for many, many generations to come, much longer than the talks that have, you know, taken place after World War I and World War II, etcetera.
@CraigKellyPHON - Craig Kelly
This is only going to get worse across many countries as more and more people awake to what they did. Those that violated human rights and the Nuremberg code by forcing others to undergo an ineffective, unsafe & unnecessary experimental medical intervention are going to be held accountable.
reSee.it AI Summary
Speranza faces murder charges in Italy for allegedly concealing COVID vaccine side effects. Italy stands out in Europe for media coverage on the vaccine controversy and the World Stealth Organization's alleged coup-by-treaty under the guise of pandemic preparedness.
@NassMeryl - MERYL NASS, MD
Speranza has been charged with murder in Italy for covering up the side effects of the COVID vaccines and forcing them on the country regardless. Italy is the only country in Europe where even mainstream media are covering the COVID vaccine debacle and the World Stealth Organization's planned coup-by-treaty, under the pretext of "pandemic preparedness."
@Biz_Shrink - Dr. Jan Halper-Hayes
Former Italian Health Minister Roberto Speranza Has Been Charged With Murder: Covering Up Side Effects of the Experimental COVID Shots Enforced on Population He can no longer move without police protection. The Italians are waiting for him everywhere and shouting "Murderer" https://t.co/3eIIGhwszo
reSee.it AI Summary
Dutch Government data hacked, revealing a shocking number of Covid adverse reactions. Governments worldwide accused of a cover-up. Excess deaths rising, but silence from authorities. Dutch Minister of Health accused of lying. Parliament members choosing fines over releasing information. A global awakening is happening as people realize the truth. Governments failing to protect their people and potentially involved in a dark depopulation agenda. Time to join the quest for freedom and justice.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
Exclusive Breaking: Dutch Government Data hacked and startling amount of Covid adverse reactions obtained. Astounding amount of data obtained. Millions of records now seen. There is a massive attempted coverup not only by the Government in Holland but in every nation that has been infiltrated by Globalists. Excess Deaths are exploding but there is a wall of silence from our respective Governments. I'm joined from Holland by Dutch Freedom Fighters and Truth Seekers, former Dutch Parliamentarian and business entrepreneur Wybren van Haga, Businessman and Data expert Wouter Aukema and Anne Merel Kloosterman who is representing many vaccine injured. The Dutch Minister of health has lied and needs to be brought to task. Members of parliament are being forced into court but would rather pay the fines imposed by the courts than release the information!!! Just what are they hiding? A Great Awakening is taking place all around the world as people wake up and realise what has been done to them. Justice must be done and if any Government refuses to obey their own laws and constitution then they become illegitimate and those who form it and those who support them essentially become the enemy of the people they are supposed to be governing. The first order of any Government is to protect its own people. Not only have they failed to do this but they are attempting to hide their failings and perhaps more disturbingly hide a dark de-population agenda that they are involved in. They have essentially broken their contract with the people. Its time to get on board and join the quest for freedom and justice. Join us http://freedomtraininternational.org @waukema @WybrenvanHaga @annemerel_ bvnl.nl/word-lid http://aukema.org
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, Jim Ferguson interviews Anne, Walter, and Wieburn, who share their experiences and findings related to the COVID-19 vaccine and government actions. Anne discusses her personal experience of being vaccine injured by the Moderna vaccine, while Walter presents his analysis of government data indicating an increase in serious side effects reported after the vaccine rollout. Wieburn raises concerns about the lack of transparency and censorship surrounding the pandemic, as well as potential dark agendas and the erosion of individual rights. The speakers also touch on various issues such as bullying, unconstitutional behavior by politicians, climate change, data corruption, and the importance of small communities. They express concerns about globalism, the control of food and resources, and the erosion of personal liberties. Unity and collaboration are emphasized as crucial for finding solutions, and support for farmers and advocacy for transparency in data collection and scientific research are expressed. Overall, the speakers stress the need to prioritize the well-being of children and fight for justice, while calling for more transparency and justice in government actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, thanks very much indeed. Welcome to the channel. My name is Jim Ferguson, and I've got some very, very interesting guests. Some of whom I met on my recent trip to Holland, and I would like to to welcome Anne, Walter, and Wieveryn to the channel. How are you all folks?
Everybody fine?
Speaker 1: Yep. Fine.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I'm fine.
Speaker 3: For inviting us, Sergio.
Speaker 0: Well, I'll be looking forward to this conversation. But as we always do with the first time guests onto the channel, I'll maybe ask each of you just to say a little bit about who you are, where you're based. And maybe, Anne, if we could start with yourself first of all, please.
Speaker 2: Well, my name is Anne Miro Glauschmann. If you can call me in. I'm 26 years old, vaccine injured by Moderna. And I'm representing the COVID vaccine injured victims in the Netherlands together with Wipro and Nager.
Speaker 0: Thanks so much indeed, and I appreciate that. And we're we're gonna come on to to some of that, as an important part of the discussion. And, Walter, can we, go to you next, please? Thank you.
Speaker 3: Yeah. My name is, Walter Aukema. I'm based in, I'm Dutch and based in the Netherlands. 50 years old, my career started as a computer hacker back in 2000. I published my research at DEFCON in Las Vegas, hit the world press there.
Had my company called Trust Factory where we analyze the behavior of computer users for multinationals and governments worldwide. I sold that to a large American multinational. Since then, I do a lot of research into, apparently, COVID, matters in the past 4 years.
Speaker 0: Okay. Thanks so much indeed, Walter. And Wieburn, if you could just introduce yourself and where you're from and what you do as well, please.
Speaker 1: Thank you very much, Jim. Yeah, I'm Vibran Barnhager. I'm 57 years old. I didn't realize that I'm probably the oldest, of the group here, but, I'm an electrical engineer from Delft. I, after I joined the army, I joined Shell.
I worked for Shell for 10 years. And after that, I became an entrepreneur, IT care, solar power, and now I'm in real estate. And I used to be a member of parliament for the past 6 years, first for the Liberal Party until they kicked me out because they don't want entrepreneurs to be a member of the party anymore, and then I started my own, my own party, which is BDNL. It's the interest of the Netherlands. People be can become a member as well.
Go to our website, www.bbnl.nl, and sign up. And, and now I'm together with these lovely people, I'm fighting this, this COVID scam, which, which is a house of cards, and I honestly believe it will soon be tumbling down.
Speaker 0: Well, thanks very much indeed, Weaver, for that. And, we're gonna come back to some of the the political aspects in a moment because I think it's very, very important. But, you know, I was over in Holland. I went over to support the Dutch powers. I met many great people there.
Of course, there was people there from those Freedom Fighters from Canada, people that I'd actually met on my travels to Ottawa towards the end of last year. There was people from the UK. There was people from America, and there was people from Australia there as well. It was a packed assembly. It was an incredibly well attended event.
And, much to my surprise, I met Anne. We all we all there's a big group of us went out for some dinner that night, and I find out that Anne had followed me on Twitter, and I actually had followed her back, so, before we even knew. So it's great to to see you, and it's great, of course, to meet you, Walter, Anne Weaver as well. Now in terms of this whole COVID thing, let me ask you, maybe I'll just come to you, Arne, just for one moment, please. Because excess deaths in the UK are at an all time high.
And indeed, we have seen more civilian deaths within the last couple of years since the vaccine rollout than we saw in the entirety of World War 2. And when you put that into context, that is a shocking amount of of of problems that we've seen. Now you you in your introduction said that you were vaccine injured. And I think did you say it was the Moderna vaccine? Can you tell us a little bit about what happened with you, please?
Speaker 2: Well, I was still studying when the COVID crisis broke out. And at some point, they were threatening with the possibility of being excluded from university if you were unvaccinated. So that's when I decided to get the jab, yeah, to avoid possible delay in my studies. And after the second dose of Moderna, it went completely wrong. It started with life threatening edema in my face and legs, inflammation, paralysis.
And I suffered also from a severe skin condition and extreme hair loss and a lot of other, symptoms. But if I need to explain my whole medical records, we are, not done before tomorrow. So I will leave it to that. But, the the physical symptoms are not the worst. It's actually the mental struggle of not being dismissed with psychological issues that for me, personally, was the hardest.
Because once you are, vaccine injured, you no longer belong to the group vaccinated or unvaccinated. The guest life comes from both sides. And that's also why, a lot of victims are afraid to speak out.
Speaker 0: But I'm Well, you know what? So sorry, Anne. It's it's important that people have got the confidence to speak out. And, you know, there's a lot of people waking up to what's actually been done to them, and what the reasons might be for that. And they are they are complex, but they are also quite dark.
And I'm gonna come on to some of that shortly. But I would like to go back to Walter for a moment, please, Walter. Because, you know, just before we went to the live record, you you said something to me about government data and, that you had, in fact, hacked into the system. Do you want to tell us a little bit more about that, of what you actually uncovered, please?
Speaker 3: Yeah. Sure. Sure. Sure. Ever since the the rollout of the of the COVID vaccines, as a as a big data expert, I I dove into the databases that are offered by the Dutch institute, that, is is investigating adverse reactions similar to what what, Anne Mill has suffered from.
And also, in Europe, we have the European Medicines Agency where they have a legal obligation to transparently share all the individual case safety reports that are brought in by either patients or healthcare professions. But the interface that EMA is offering is very very limited. So what I did is I wrote a piece of script together with a fellow programmer, where we automated the downloading of every ICSR, every case safety report that was published in the past 20 years for all medications, not just COVID vaccines, everything. And so this is big data. I'm I'm looking at millions and millions of records where I, and this is this is my expertise in the past 20 years.
I visualize this data. This is official government data. I visualize that in order to to to discover patterns to provide insights to people and and and scientists. If if you allow me, I would love to share my screen and and talk you through that. Is that okay, Jim?
Speaker 0: Yes. Guys, absolutely. Just just be feel free to share your screen just so.
Speaker 3: Okay. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. So what I would like to show you is the dashboard that I created for this purpose.
So let me maximize that screen for for you all. There we go. So let me talk you through. On the horizontal axis here on the on the bottom right part, you see a timeline that goes from January 1, 2020 2018 up until end of March 2023. And you see two lines in here.
The orange lines is everything but COVID vaccines. These are reports that came in every week, so about 6,000 per week that came in in the years before COVID. During COVID, you see a slight drop in the number of side effects being reported on all kinds of medication. And then in the blue line, we see the start of the medication in January 2021. Notice how immediately the number side effects being reported, serious side effects we're looking at is exploding way way beyond, you know, what was normal in in Europe.
This is all of Europe. Now on the left hand side, you see all kinds of bubbles and each bubble represents a side effect. So this can be, a a pain, this can be, headache, this can be, nausea. Every bubble is a reaction and the bigger the bubble, the more reports concerning this particular reaction. On the upper right hand side, this is all the medication including the COVID vaccines.
So everything you see here down below is represented up here. I want to show you only the COVID vaccines. So I'm deselecting all other medication, and I want to focus here on the 2 big bubbles. The most reported side effect of the COVID vaccines, Tim, was COVID itself? Did you know that?
No. And so I can visualize that because we have all the data of the email. I can order that by by system ordering class. So if we take a look at cardiac disorders, then now all of a sudden, for the COVID vaccines, I see all the reactions corresponding to, that were reported with COVID vaccine. So here you see pericarditis, you see myocarditis, which is well known, yeah, but what is not on the on the on the leaflets, on the product leaflet is the arrhythmia, the acinopectoris.
And and as we can see in the data, it is being reported extremely much here. So let me zoom back out and select only the medication without COVID vaccines. And here we see a disturbing signal, Jim. Where normally we have some 5, 6000 reports that we're coming in. At the end of 2022, early 2023, we see an explosion in side effects being reported for medication not being the COVID charge.
And if I select this explosion in my dashboard, then automatically we can see which medication is involved. This for example is Inflectra. We have thousands of reports for a medicine called Inflectra. I'm sure you don't know what it is. I don't know either.
So I've programmed the model in such a manner that we can go to the EMA and the EMA will immediately explain to me what this medication is being used for. In this case, it's anti inflammatory. So we're looking at immune problems. Let's take a look at one more example. This is Keytruda.
The second largest being reported in that time frame. Let's take a look at the EMA to see what this is used for. This is dealing with cancer. This is cancer medication. Okay.
I hope my my screen doesn't turn black. There you go. Now I can see my screen. So this is all dealing with with cancer. So I want to show the people that the explosion in side effects that we see here in the end of 22, early 2023 is caused by medication dealing with immune problems and cancer.
And that I find rather disturbing.
Speaker 0: I think, I mean, this is fascinating, and we're gonna put links up once it goes to editing, where where people could other people can actually look at the stage as well. Would that be alright, Walter?
Speaker 3: Yeah. With one side note, Jim, I'm updating the dashboard with the latest data up to last month. And as this is, we're looking at 100,000,000 of records. So it it I need 2 weeks to to get this back online with an updated version.
Speaker 0: Understood. And, obviously, we we we will, obviously, you know, we'll wait and and take that into consideration. Now, I mean, this is quite shocking, but it also ties in with a lot of medical experts who come on as guests on my channel. I'm thinking of people like doctor Marcus. You know, he is a cancer specialist.
I'm talking about Jim Thorpe and and many others. There seems to be well, it's not a it's not a medical term when they talk about turbocancers. I think they're talking about a more medical term being early onset of cancer now. Let me ask you, in the in in your country, are the politicians and I'm gonna come on to Weaver just just now on this because you've worked within the the the parliament there. But, I mean, is it being widely reported that there is a massive problem with excess deaths?
Or is it like the UK and many other countries where they don't want to talk about it? Weaver, what's your what's your thoughts on that?
Speaker 1: It's it's as you say, from the start of the COVID episode, there's been an unwillingness to talk about anything when we're talking about face masks. You know, face masks just work, and it's mandatory, so everybody is compliant. And it's it's it's like it's like a sec like behavior where where you either join in or you're you're out of the group. It was the same with, lockdowns. I've repeatedly asked, well, what are the what is the cholesterol damage for the lockdowns, and nobody wanted to tell me.
And at the end, we discovered that there was a report on, on the downsides of the lockdown. And I'm not sure whether you're familiar with the term qualies or CALIs, the, the the quality adjusted life years. And apparently, there was a report saying that if you go into lockdown in in the Netherlands, you will lose 620,000, life years healthy life years, and you will gain 100,000. So the net result was you you will just kill 520,000 life years. So in parliament, it was impossible to talk about all these things.
And, of course, the the the absolute sum of all this was the the discussion around the vaccines. Vaccines were fantastic. Our minister of health, Hugo de Jong, he said, well, we we can be really transparent about it. If you take the vaccine, you can't get COVID anymore, you can't transmit it anymore, and there are no side effects. That's literally what he said.
Then, of course, people like Wouter started to analyze the data, and we were informed that there was excess excess debts. So what happens next? There was a there was a debate that was asked by Peter some half half year ago, and it got kicked down the road. And they recently had this debate, and it was it it it was just sad. Nobody really talked about, well, the relation between or the possible well, not even the correlation, but even the the causality between the vaccinations and the excess deaths.
Nothing whatsoever. Basically, everybody thinks still thinks well, in parliament, that, that when you take the vaccine, you're you're safe, and any excess death will probably stem from, well, other things, but people not getting treated for cancer or delayed care or whatever. But, I I think it's sad because I think in the well, amongst the normal people who are watching this, they they lose faith in in politics for for a start, and they everybody realizes that if you look at the graphs, if you look at the data, that, of course, these excess deaths are core deeply correlated to the vaccine program. So it would be a lot better if politicians and also the minister of of health would actually do a proper investigation and start start listening to people like Wouter. And and and also the other thing is maybe you've got a lot of people like Anne Miro who are still suffering from from the vaccine.
So there should be some sort of an apology, and there should well, I I don't know. May maybe some, some form of compensation. And in my honest opinion, I even think that some of the people who've actually lied, like our minister of, of health, well, why not bring it to court and let a judge decide on whether, yeah, whether this was a crime against humanity or not?
Speaker 0: I'm I'm very interested. I'm gonna stay on you, Weaver, just for a moment, and then I'm gonna come to Anne to get her view on this. But here in the United Kingdom, there was an investigative journalist exposed the fact that our British prime minister, who is the prime minister at the moment, when he was chancellor of the Exchequer, invested a very large sum of money. It's a very interesting way that he did it because he put half a $1,000,000,000, that's $500,000,000 into a shell account, of a company called Thelene Partners. And he put that into a place called the Cayman Islands, which is a notorious tax haven.
The money was then transferred into none other than Moderna. So that's half a $1,000,000,000 of his personal investment went into Moderna. I want to draw your attention to the fact that Moderna, at that point, had never had a successful product to market. So here here we have a man who's investing what can only be described as a colossal sum of money into a company that had no successful marketable products or history up until that point. He then went on to invest £1,000,000,000 of taxpayers money in the UK into Moderna a little bit after this, after he became prime minister.
And that money was to enable Moderna to come in and set up further business interests in the United Kingdom. First of all, he stood up in parliament, and he said that the vaccines were categorically safe and effective. A member of the British parliament, indeed a member of parliament in his own party called Andrew Bridgen, stood up and said, look. My constituents are concerned. We want to find out what's going on.
We believe there's vaccine injuries being caused. He was vilified. He was drummed out of the conservative party. He was effectively thrown out and became an independent. He's an independent now.
I had him on my show, about 4 weeks ago. During that interview, he revealed something that nobody had been aware of, but this or at least those very close to were. That he had compiled a list of data and evidence of potential very serious criminal activity by the very heads of the British government, including potentially Richie Sirach, the British Prime Minister, and members of the civil service. And, Andrew Bridgerton then wrote to the head of the Metropolitan Police in London, a man by the name of Sir Mark Rowley, and requested an audience with him and about 20 to 25 other expert witnesses to present this evidence to him. Now to date, he has received no reply.
First of all, as a former parliamentarian in the Dutch parliament, I appreciate things are slightly different, but there's sort of low similarities within parliaments around the world. Weaver, what's your what's your thinking about the potential conduct? Do you think that that would be classed as a conflict of interest, for example? Over to you.
Speaker 3: Of course.
Speaker 1: I think that's clear. But, during these years of the pandemic, I've always asked, well, is this just sheer stupidity, or is it is it really bad behavior? Is it really is it is it just really gross misconduct or whatever, and or is there a big scheme behind it? I I I never really understood what was happening. But when you follow the money, really strange things happen.
For instance, we had a private test infrastructure. I mean, I'm I'm I was dead against testing because it was a pandemic of tests, and and all these tests were just completely foolish and wrong, and and they couldn't test anything. And if you have enough cycles, any PCR test is positive, but that was another issue. But then our minister of, of health wanted to have a test infrastructure. But we have the governmental test infrastructure, the GGD, and we have a a private test infrastructure, new diagnostics, for instance.
And still he decided, well, let's let's not do this. Let's, we we we just start an association. We call it Open Netherlands, the Association of the Open Netherlands, SON, and we just give them €1,000,000,000 and do whatever you like with it. And we pay for for, well, the capacity of of testing, but they don't even really have to test. And we we don't fool any legislation, any rules, any European rules.
We just just screw all that. No. Just 1,000,000,000 do whatever you do with it. And this was illegal. And, of course, you can you can ask anything.
You you you can as a parliamentarian, of course, you've you've got, some constitutional ways of of getting information. You're not getting any information. There it's it's a closed circuit. And, so now as a as a non parliamentarian, I'm trying to go to court to get all this information. You're still not getting it.
They they they even prefer to, to pay the fines that the the the judge puts on them, and and they prefer to pay the fines instead of, giving us the information. So we have started our own association, which is called the Association of Corona Damages. And through this this, this association, we're actually trying to persuade the government to be transparent, give us all the data, and, but, again, like you asked in the previous question, it should be coming from the parliamentarians themselves. If if a majority of the parliamentarians actually demands transparency and demands, well, to to to bring these culprits to justice, it will happen, but it's not happening at the moment. And even though some people actually realize that all this money is gone, 5,500,000,000 of receipts can't be found, which is just transferred to to people.
And people have, have, actually paid private investigators, and they said, well, you know, there's 30,000,000 that has been transferred to Anguilla. Why? You can ask the question to the to to the minister. He won't answer. We're we're trying to get the we're we're trying to get to look into the books of this association.
We're not allowed to, and this is our constitutional right. We are the people. We we should be able to know what is happening with our taxpayers' money, but we're not. And we we know. At least we have, a 99% inkling that it has been used for all these sort of devious or stupid, things that they've done with it.
And and and the same is true for all these contracts with Moderna and Pfizer. We can't we can't see it, and we we know by now that Pfizer and Moderna, they knew what they were doing. It's the same with with the Ivermectin and the hydroxychloroquine. It's it's it's just a big scam, and everybody knows it. It's just we need a different government that will actually give transparency so that these these people will be brought brought to justice.
But it will take a long time, I'm afraid.
Speaker 0: Right. Well, maybe. May may maybe something will happen that will actually speed up the process. But let me come to you, Anne, for a moment because you were actually vaccine injured by the Moderna vaccine. And I've told you that Ritchie Sinek, the British prime minister, invested a colossal sum of money in a company that had no previous track record.
Doesn't make sense. Business people don't invest, especially don't invest, very large sums of money into companies with no proven track record unless they know something that nobody else does, unless they have inside information that nobody else does. When you hear this, as somebody that's vaccinated by the very Moderna vaccine, how does that make you feel?
Speaker 2: Well, it's almost like you're waking up in a nightmare, and it's never ending. It's, inhumane. I just can't understand that people are that bad, to be honest. But it's the same in the Netherlands, actually. At one point, I was able to reach Wiegren, and he was actually the only politician who was willing to listen from my plea for help.
And from the moment he heard about my vaccine injury, he's been very involved and very supportive. And, we've been working together since the day we met to get justice. So he's actually the only one who's willing to listen and who really cares. And probably, it's the same in the UK. Only a few politicians are willing to listen.
Mostly are not.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I I mean, I I can't begin to tell you how that I can't even imagine how that could feel because unless you've actually had something like that happen to you, you I mean, you can you can try to imagine it, but that's not the same as waking up every day knowing that you've you've you've now got the the the issues that you have, and that you're vaccine injured with the Moderna vaccine. In terms of of justice, I'm gonna come on to, Walter because your data is very, very relevant to all of this. But, I want to get your opinion, going back to you, Weaver, and just for one moment. When you say that you are constitutionally entitled to ask these questions, but they are refusing to answer you, Does that not raise questions about the legitimacy of any government that refuses to obey its own constitution and laws, if the people see a government behaving in that way, would it be any surprise if the people within that particular country said, well, in that case, you're not going to honor the constitution.
You're not going to honor the law. Why should we? What do you think about that?
Speaker 3: I think that that yeah.
Speaker 1: Who are you asking the question?
Speaker 0: My apologies. To Wieburn, Walter, and then I'm gonna come back to you just after that.
Speaker 1: Alright. Yeah. Fair point. The Dutch are not notorious for starting a revolution. So, and and having seen what happened during the COVID situation, everybody just complied.
It's like Matthias de Smets, in Belgium said, well, you know, you've got 60% of the people. They always comply, whatever you tell them to. And then you've got 30% of the people who, you know, they they manipulate the other 60%. These are the socialists, the communists, and and then you've got 10 10% of the people, and it's probably all 4 of us belong to that 10%, we sort of have a bit of an authority problem. We always wonder, well, you know, is the government really doing this for me, or is it just a scam?
And these 10% were just, bullied the way through the through through this, pandemic. But coming back to the constitution, article 68 of our constitution stipulates that, a member of parliament can ask anything, and they are obliged to give it. But what they what they give as a as a reason for for not complying is that, yeah, the interest of the state, implies that we can't give it to you. One example is that the OMT, the outbreak management team, they had gatherings, meetings, discussions, and they were all recorded. The records are still there, and we want to know what has been said because between the lines, some of the professors that were on the outbreak management teams, they said, well, you know, it's not really true.
Some of them even said in during the first 6 months, well, the the face mask don't work at all, so don't don't make it mandatory. So we want to know who actually took a turn and, well, changed the the the the the the actions or changed the the measures that were imposed. And we are well, we have actually taken them to court, and, of course, still nothing happens. We're we're still waiting for the 1st session with the judge. But, of course, as you know, you you have you have to go through all sorts of measures.
You have to ask for it or they deny it, then you have to appeal, they deny it. And after a year or so, you you get to a formal hearing with the judge. But we are determined to go on and actually get get get transparency and get all this information. But the constitution, as far as I'm concerned, is null and void, when it comes to, our ministers and and even our parliamentarians. No.
No. But nobody gives a toss.
Speaker 0: Well, they are in danger of breaking their contract with the very people that elected them into those positions. And they're I don't know if they realize it or not, but they're on very, very thin ice. Walter, I wanna come back to you because, I wanna clarify the fact that when I explained explained that you had hacked this this data, you did do it legally, didn't you? Please explain a little bit more about that.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. The hand show, in order to to be able to grab that data by hand, it would take a 100 people, a 100 years to to do a shot because you're looking at 1,000 of types of medicines, and you would need to download everything which takes you half an hour per per metric indication to download. So what what I did together with the developer, I I crafted a script that automates that process of downloading all that data.
So by doing that, I don't have to log in. I don't steal any passwords, nothing. I'm just repeating human behavior on their website but I do that extremely quickly. And so as a consequence, I can now download all the EMA data within 2 hours of time.
Speaker 0: That's incredible. I have to say that that is very, very clever. Very, very clever. I praise you for it. That's amazing.
And I'm I'm I'm very much interested in the data that you've shared with us. I mean, there obviously is gonna be limitations in terms of time and how much we can go into, but I'm gonna extend this just a little bit past what we would normally have for an interview, if that's okay. We would normally go for about, you know, 35, 40 minutes. But I would like to maybe extend that a little bit.
Speaker 2: One more thing about the excess mortality data in the Netherlands because the unexplained excess mortality data in the Netherlands completely covered up by privacy legislation, thanks to the amendment law of January 1st 2020, rebounding access to medical records through next of kin. They made it legally impossible to retrieve these data. And because of privacy legislation, you may only perform pathological examinations of the deceased if a crime is likely have been committed or if the declaration has been signed. If the deceased did not sign the declaration as a living person, the official cause of death will remain private. In addition, there was also a redefinition of the state is vaccinated.
It takes 14 days for Moderna, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca, and even 28 days for Johnson before a person is to fight as vaccinated. So if you die within that certain period of time, the disease will be recorded as unvaccinated.
Speaker 3: May I may I add to that, Admiral, if you allow me, James? Of course. Professor Norman Fenton in the UK has done extensive research in this area exactly, confirming what Anne Miro is talking about. I, as a data analyst, I analyse patterns. And what I did is I analysed the vaccination registry in the Netherlands for ever since since they started with with, with vaccinations.
This registry, which is of of crucial importance for scientific research is, mutilated. And what I discovered, if you allow me to share the screen again, I can show you exactly what I saw in the data. Here we are looking at a time frame from January 21 again, and every week, the Dutch government is reporting the number of first doses that were administered in the Dutch population. What I discovered is that in May 2022, all of a sudden, some 600,000 jabs would went up missing in this registry gym. And that is quite peculiar because similar to that misclassification that also Norman Fenton investigated, if if you fall in the category of 600 deaths that were missing, you you go into history books as unvaccinated.
And what I discovered, and I and I will show you the official, I will show you the official statement by the Netherlands because every EU member state reports the number of doses administered to the European Central Disease Control. Now I want to quote, to cite a piece of text from the Dutch country displaying. Yeah. Doses administered to people who are since deceased or have emigrated are not included in the reported doses. In essence, data from these persons are currently also incorrectly removed from historical coverage estimates.
So I have here a government that is clearly stating that all the people that have deceased or emigrated since they received that jab have been removed from the vaccination registry. Are you aware of what consequences this has for any scientific research that is performed on this registry, Jim? Mhmm. Yeah.
Speaker 0: I mean, this is
Speaker 3: my way. It's going wrong. It's going wrong.
Speaker 0: I mean, we're talking extremely large numbers of people. This this to me looks like a cover up. Or or am I using more language is too strong in your opinion? What do you think, what
Speaker 3: Yeah. Well, I don't know the the the reason behind this. I don't know why this happens. The government needs to explain this. I think parliament members in Holland need to, question the the the the health ministry in Holland about this.
Because bear in mind that every research that you perform using this registry will give false results. Mhmm. Extreme positive results as you can imagine.
Speaker 1: But it's strange that on on from many sides, the data are being manipulated, but also, there's a lot of censorship going on. I've I've actually taken, LinkedIn and YouTube to court at some point during the pandemic because they were just removing posts. And, well, recently, last week, my podcast, was, was removed from YouTube because it's against the rules and regulations to talk about vaccination. And we were having an open discussion, and it wasn't even COVID, vaccination. It was you know, the the the the the percentages of regular vaccinations are dropping, and it's because people were forced during the COVID pandemic.
And so we were talking about vaccination. And to be honest, I think vaccination against polio is good, but it's it's up to the individual. And I I anybody should should choose by for themselves, for their children, and it's the individual's sovereignty.
Speaker 0: But You you you said it is
Speaker 1: is immense.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I mean, you make a very good point. I mean, one of the things that they did, there was a lot of psyops, psychological operations, carried out against the UK population, and I suspect in lots of other places as well. I mean, Brigade 77, which is a specialist arm of the British military, which is designed to attack hostile foreign intelligences and their military capability, was actually turned against the British people. And anybody that tried to speak up or question the narrative from the vaccines being safe and effective when effectively says it has shut down.
And one of the biggest parties that were involved in that were Facebook. I, fairly early on, actually joined a group because I was interested in what was being said. And there was, well, there was tens of thousands of members in this with people reporting injuries. They were they're putting up photographs of inflamed arms or legs or whatever. And they got shut down very, very quickly.
And I know that YouTube, are are heavy on the censorship. In fact, the only platform that's not, is indeed X or, as it used to be known as Twitter. Now there is there is another aspect to all of this, and it's it's about the fact that there's a lot of these countries working in lock step together. Do you all remember the mantra, build back better? Do you all remember hearing that?
Of course.
Speaker 3: Yes. Yes.
Speaker 2: Of course.
Speaker 0: Trudeau in Canada, Mark Rutte in Holland, Jacinda Dernan in, New Zealand, and all the all these other people. There is, it would appear to be, a globalist controlled central command. Now I don't know who's ultimately in charge of that. I actually don't think it's Klaus Schwab with the World Economic Forum, although I think he is an instrumental and integral part, perhaps, within the financial aspect of the globalist movement. But there appears to me to be something going on here that transcends national borders.
And that's why I went ahead and set up the Freedom Movement, Freedom Trade International, started to create that and build that about 15 months ago after extensive contact with people in the United States of America, Canada, and other countries. Now I want to ask you, because I like to give hope to people. I like to I like to see justice being done. But from what you're telling me, collectively, and I'm very, very grateful to each and every one of you for coming on. It takes courage to do what each of you are doing, and I appreciate it.
I can assure you that our audience are gonna be very, very interested to hear what former parliamentarians are saying, those that are involved in the political arena, those who have actually been involved and injured by the vaccine, and indeed, those who have uncovered the data like you have, Walter, as well. They'll be very interested to hear about this because there is a growing movement, a growing consensus opinion that there is something far, far more sinister going on. And I'm gonna ask you to give me your opinion if you're willing to do it because in my opinion, when I listen to people like Bill Gates saying that there are too many people in the world, and he thinks that we should reduce the population. When I hear professor Dennis Meadows saying things like, we've got to drop the population down from 8,000,000,000 to 1,000,000,000, and he really means it. He actually has got into the the discussions on video where he says that we need to ethically think about, you know, helping people to be euthanized, to get down to that population of the ideal amount being 1,000,000,000 in his opinion.
But he and his like are never the first to volunteer, are they? Do you do you guys I'm gonna I'm gonna start with you first of all, Anne. And if you don't want to express an opinion on it, I I completely understand because it is quite a strong opinion. But in my opinion, there is some truth to it. And I put this to top doctors.
I put this to British parliamentarians who have basically formed the same opinion as me. There could be a depopulation agenda at work. Can I ask you, Anne, Do you think that there is a possibility? As horrific as that might be, do you think that that's a possibility?
Speaker 2: Well, based on all the research I've done, I'm pretty sure. I totally agree with you.
Speaker 0: Wow. Okay. Alright. Thank you. Going on to, Walter.
Walter, what's your thoughts? You've studied this data. You've seen what is very strange data where where people are are sort of being knocked off the list and all the things that's associated. The turbo cancers, the early onset cancers, and those drugs which I had never heard of before. Thank you for sharing that.
Do you think there's a dark agenda?
Speaker 3: I don't know, Jim, to be honest. My focus in the past 4 years has been to show the people the the truth, via the data analysis that I do. I I cannot, think in in in-depth, area because it would hinder me from performing my data analytics.
Speaker 0: Okay. Okay. Appreciate that. I absolutely understand. Weaver, I mean, you are, you're an entrepreneur, you're a business person, you're a parliamentarian, you're you're somebody that that fights obviously for justice.
But do you think that there is a potential for a dark agenda here?
Speaker 1: Well, I really like this question because this has been what I've been on about in the past, 15, 20 years. I'm a libertarian, and I believe in individual sovereignty, individual rights. And, I believe that we've entered, an era of decadence. And you always see socialism, Marxism, communism soaring after a period of decadence. But the communists have learned from the past.
When when Pol Potts and Stalin and all these revolutions, they they never never really worked out. People got poorer and poorer, and in the end, it was a revolution. So what what happened in the Netherlands, I think it's it's it's it's a good example for the rest of the world because we're a we're we're a country that's leading the world according to our prime minister. What happened is that the Communist Party rebranded themselves, and they call themselves green green left. And the new ideology was climate.
And so we're all good people. We're sort of gender dysmorphed. We we but but they are doing exactly the same as what the old Marxists were doing. They're cutting the ties between families, cutting the ties, the the solidarity between generations. Parents are not allowed to pay for their children anymore.
The first thing they want to do is increase heritage tax and and all that sort of communist bullshit. In the end of the day, when you when you see through that scheme and climate is something good and CO2 is something bad and nitrogen is really bad, and so we're getting rid of the farmers and their land, and you wonder, hey. This is exactly what Pol Pot and Stalin were doing. The the first were attacking the farmers, then the fishermen, and then the house owners. Well, now we're seeing this enormous assault on house owners.
I'm I'm a house owner as well. It's it's it's just it's confiscating people's property, and it's exactly the same as what was happening in previous communist, revolutions.
Speaker 0: But I just reported sorry. I was just I was just gonna say, I reported in the last couple of days to bear out what you're saying, Wavir, and the fact that is in the United Kingdom, they have now started to ex appropriate to compulsory purchase Yes. In people's homes for asylum seekers. And they're now they might turn around and say, well, actually, you're you don't need that house. You don't need that property.
So we are going to ask you to leave it. And we're gonna downgrade you into a council house or a council flat somewhere, and that property then will be taken over for people that are here, effectively, illegally. And it's interesting. Now, I mean, it wouldn't be right for me not to pay tribute.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Exactly the same legal infrastructure has already been implemented in the Netherlands. But but what what it was coming to, before, this this ideology about climate, which is sort of a a communist layer on top of everything, is the first ideology that actually feels that humanity is bad for the planet. We have to save the planet. And who is bad for the planet?
Not the animals, not the plants, no. The the human race, so we have to get rid of us, which is really silly be because who who would actually say, well, get rid of us? It's it's a really strange ideology, but it's the first time in my life at least that I've noticed that people are actually believing that we are bad and we have to die or not have children or, you know, be killed, and it's it's really weird.
Speaker 0: It's it's deeply alarming. But as I said, the globalists, are I'm I'm sorry. I call them globalist parasites. I hope I'm offending anybody, but that's what I see them like. They are they are unhinged psychopathic, obnot just evil people.
And quite frankly, it's high time we stood up to them because, you know, when I when I was a young guy in school, I went to school. I was very shy. I know you'll probably laugh at at that, but I used to be very shy. I used to be very quiet. And, sometimes people would would pick on me, and, of course, I didn't want any trouble.
And then something just switched to me, and I ended up fighting back. And and I found that I could actually hit back quite hard. And then I used to go in I was telling this to somebody in an interview quite recently. A friend of mine in Alabama, I was saying to him that, I ended up used to protect the other kids from getting bullied as well. And sometimes they got me into trouble with the teachers, because they used to get the bullies used to get bullied by me, at the end of the day.
So we've got to stand up for what we believe in. And I think when you see politicians and governments behaving in an unconstitutional way, where they have effectively broken their contract with people, then we can no longer honor them. We can no longer pay attention to them. We can no longer respect them because they don't respect us. Respect is a two way street.
We have to give respect in order to get respect back. But it's a dark it is a dark agenda. And when you hear people like Professor Dennis Meadows just casually saying, yeah, well, you know, 1,000,000,000 maybe 2, but if you have to have 2,000,000,000 then you're gonna have to live in a dictatorship. I mean, that was his that was his own words. But he's not volunteering.
And you're absolutely right, Lieven, when you say we are going to see a trend now where people are encouraged to kill themselves. And we've seen this in Canada.
Speaker 3: Can I
Speaker 1: ask you a question, Jim?
Speaker 0: Of course.
Speaker 1: Because we still live in a democracy with some flaws and, you know, there's some some some discussion about how, the the elections are actually gone, and I understand all that. But it's still a functional democracy. Why do you think the majority in in in every European country still votes for all these collectivists?
Speaker 0: Well, they don't really have anybody else to vote for. I mean, I I've had this conversation very, very much with regards to my friends in Canada and indeed in Australia, because it's the same in the UK, I suspect. It's probably similar in your country as well, where you have a government of a particular party and then you have the official opposition of another party. And at one time, you could vote for the party that you liked or you agreed with more than others. But right now, it would appear that in the majority of these countries, we have globalists who have infiltrated those parties.
So no matter who you vote for, you're getting Klaus Schwab and his policies in. I'm just coming back to something you said about the climate change. I call it the climate scam. At one time, you know, I mean let's face it, who doesn't want to protect our oceans? Who doesn't want to protect our green lands and our green belts and our fields and our nature?
I mean, everybody wants to do that. Every right thinking person wants to do that. But I believe that the that sort of movement was captured by globalists and turned into something completely different, where it's become like a religion to them now. And they really do believe in some very extreme things. In fact, I can't remember the chap's name.
He was the former founder or leader of Greenpeace, who in his day was considered to be quite sort of extreme. But he's come out and said, what they're talking about with the climate is utter nonsense, and it's deeply concerning. Let me ask you then collectively here, and maybe we'll get you some answers on that. Because I'm a great believer in in identifying problems is one thing, but we've also got to find solutions to it, haven't we? Because it's one thing to criticize, but it's also a whole other thing when you're actually offering solutions to people.
I mean, let's start with you, Anne. You're a young you're a young woman from, from Bolland who who's had that terrible experience. By the way, I was gonna ask you, what was it you were studying in university or are studying in university?
Speaker 2: I studied international business, but I'm studying law right now. I just started again.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, I think that that's a good one. And you you're obviously gonna turn that into something that could be used to good effect, no doubt, I suspect. Yeah. Utsa sorry.
Walter, what can we do, and and then we'll go back to Alan. What can we do to put things right? You're coming up with a lot of data. You're getting a lot of information. I mean, is it just is it good enough just to simply keep on trying to wake people up, or is there something else that needs to be done in your opinion?
Speaker 3: I think that, that on every on every subject, whether it's climate or or environment or health, everywhere, I see data being corrupted. In Holland, we have a nitrogen crisis, yeah, which is basically an administrative crisis because also in Holland, just with the with the the the the vaccine doses registry in Holland that is that is, corrupted. I see also in the nitrogen data, I see a similar, data corruption. And as long as the data is wrong, then all science based on that data will give wrong answers. As a consequence, politics and and and governments will come with wrong policies based on wrong scientific outcomes.
And and I think so, the solution is to, yeah, in Holland, I would call for a ministry of data to make sure that whatever data we study, it is it is pure and accurate.
Speaker 0: Okay. And weaver I mean, I I went to Holland because I wanted to support Dutch farmers. I'm a huge supporter of the of the Dutch farmer. I mean, the Dutch farmers in itself and people don't always realize Holland's a fairly small country compared to many of the other nations like Germany. And I think Germany's the sort of the the number one, output of of foods and produce, but Holland must be a good second.
You guys have got you've got an incredible, farming techniques. I mean, it's the envy of the world. You are far in excess of most places out of the world in terms of your your farming prowess. But in my opinion, they're they're not just attacking the the farmers in Holland. They're indeed they're attacking farmers all over the world.
My concern is that once again, it goes back to this totalitarian, dystopian, new world order that they're trying to create that they control. And if if they control the food, then they can control the people. I mean, would you agree with that? Do you think that's part of the reason that we're seeing what's happening in Holland and Germany and France and other nations around the world, Ivan? Yes.
Speaker 1: I well, you used the word dystopian. I think that's exactly what it is. We've all read the the the book We from Jevgeny Zamjatin, George Orwell, 1984, Aldous Huxley, Brave New World, Animal Farm, and it's exactly what what is happening. We are attacking, our food production. We're attacking, the energy.
Well, we've even got trouble with water. It's raining all day. We are a country full of water, and we are suddenly having a problem with water. So everything is being scarce, and we're paying through the nose for everything, and it's poverty around the corner. And what what is maybe most, disturbing is that there's also this Orwellian focus on war at the moment.
Mhmm. So our prime minister, who I know reasonably well, what, 10 years ago, you wouldn't you wouldn't see him talking about war. And now he's a war mongering prime minister who is advocating, yeah, well, this is our war and we should go to Ukraine and we should pump €100,000,000 and all our defense budget in there and and send our people over there. And it's it's just it's truly dystopian. In 1984, in the book at least, there there was also always a war going on because it keeps the people busy, focused.
And so we have a prime minister standing in front of the Ukrainian flag saying, which is a misguided, World War 2, slogan. And and you wonder where this is going because I don't think any any Russian person or any Ukrainian person wants to be involved in a war. I don't wanna go to war. I'm not prepared to die for any war. I'm prepared to die for my children.
That's when I'm prepared to die. And for the rest, if if people, all these politicians or ministers or prime ministers that are in a fight, but please don't sacrifice normal young people. And I think this is this is really disturbing. I think we're heading towards a very dangerous turning point, and We The People can put it to a halt, but then we have to start voting with our brains instead of our feelings and stop being manipulated by all these collectivistic idiots and and, you know, start start realizing what we are losing at the moment. We are losing everything, and the the whole problem is that in the past, in the Soviet Union, there of course, there were there there were controls in place.
But now with all the all the electronic possibilities they have, the face recognitions, whatever they the the the the checking your bank accounts, following whatever you pay, abolishing cash payments, they once once we get into a collectivistic situation now, I think it will be very, very difficult to get rid of it because they can just switch off your life with a push of a button.
Speaker 0: You're right. You know, central bank digital currencies, we've seen digital ID laws now being passed in Australia in the Senate there, deeply concerning. I just had an interview with a friend of mine and he's from Tasmania. He's on board as a contributor with 3 of June International. And he was we we we that that will be going out tomorrow.
I think it'll be a very interesting interview for for lots of people for all the reasons we've been discussing here today. I'm conscious that we are sort of coming up to about an hour, in terms of time. And, what I always like to do is give our guests the last final say. Now we started with Anne, but I want to finish with you, Anne, if that's all right. That's fine.
Sir. And, I would like to start with, Walter, to to sort of spend the next 2 or 3 minutes just just say whatever it is that's on your heart to say whatever you feel needs to be said to the people out there, and the floor is yours, Walter.
Speaker 3: Interesting. So, yeah, like I said, when I it doesn't matter what data, what topic I touch, whether it is environmental data from the government or whether it is COVID related data. When I analyze the peer review process of the common drawstring PCR paper which is the golden standard for all the billions of PCR tests that were performed worldwide. How is it possible that the peer review took place in less than 24 hours that is impossible. So it is all it all boils down on on on the data and the data when it is not correct then we end up with science being incorrect and we end up with politics being incorrect.
And back in the old days, 20 years ago, when I was, you know, at at, at the worldwide hacker scene, if the government wouldn't give us the data, we would come and get it. Nowadays, we don't do that anymore because, you know, you you don't wanna end up in jail. But the problem is the data is being, not transparently shared with, science. As a consequence, we get one positive.
Speaker 0: Alright. Good good good points that you've made there. Thank you indeed for for that, Walter. And, Wieburn, it's just coming on to you once again. For the next 2 or 3 minutes, say whatever it is that you would like to say.
The floor is yours.
Speaker 1: Well, first of all, thank you for having us. And I think it's it's always really, important to, well, to to to mingle amongst people who are well, the small percentage who are awake. And, well, in in any war, any bad times, you you see that some people are awake and they find each other and they and and it's good to see that it's across the world that people are waking up even in countries like Canada, where where you you you've got this Justin Trudeau, who's more or less like Mark Reuter. But the point I want to make is, globalists, collectivists, and Marxists, they always think that big is beautiful, and the state should be enormous, and the people are trivial because they are attended like like like a group. I I think we have to realize that small is beautiful.
A family is beautiful. Taking care of your children is beautiful. Producing your own energy is beautiful. Having a sovereign country is beautiful with borders, and I like people from all nations, all colors, all genders. I I don't care.
But this this whole melting pot of being one one big world with this super state, this bureaucratic monster that we're creating, we should be really aware that it's it's not beautiful. The the beautiful thing is living in your own village, knowing your neighbors, taking care of your children. I think that's really important, and I hope that with the next EU, elections, the elections for the European Parliament, people, hopefully see that a lot of these parties, they are in favor of the European Union becoming more or less a, the United States of Europe and then Holland or Belgium or Germany will just be a a province, and and then it it spirals out of control. The European Union is already out of control, and I really hope that we I mean, I'm in favor of an exit, but it's not actually necessary to have an exit. I envy the British though that you've actually put your foot down and gone for the Brexit.
But it would be nice if it would be just a free trade zone without borders, but we we would protect the European borders and protect, well, the lives of the individual people. And that that is, in in my opinion, what a government should do. Do Mhmm. Do the few little things that we, as people, can't do on our own. We do it together.
The state provides that. But stop being this communist monster that that is pinning us down and holding us for ransom and making us poor and unhappy.
Speaker 0: Absolutely. I I very much agree. I believe that national leaders should always put their own countries and their own people first. And I'll stand side by side with any patriot from whether it be from the Netherlands or whether it be from the United States or anywhere else proudly as as they hold their flags up, and I'll pay tribute to them for doing it. But we work in partnership around the world, but you're absolutely right what you say about this globalist order.
It's not a good thing. Anne, coming back to you then. And and first of all, can I just say a massive thank you? As I say, it was lovely to actually have met you. You were at one end of a long table.
I was at the other end of the long table. I never got a chance to properly speak to you when I was there. But perhaps, you know, I'll I'll maybe come back or maybe get a chance to meet all of you when I do. But, Anne, thank you for introducing me to, to to Walter and to Weaver. I really appreciate it.
But as I say, I'm gonna give you the the last word here. What would you like to say over the next 2, 3 minutes? The the floor is yours.
Speaker 2: Well, first of all, thank you so much for having us. It was a pleasure to meet you, Anuril. I think it's our responsibility as adults to protect the well-being of children. So what I truly hope is that people are willing to speak up just like my dear friend, Asim Malhotra. He's, of course, one of the examples who made a mistake, and he's doing whatever he can to make up for it.
And, I think in the end, it doesn't matter if you're vaccinated or not or left or right. We are all human beings, and we need to connect and fight this together according to law, of course. But, that's the only way to get justice. So that's
Speaker 0: Well, I I I would agree with that. And and as I've been saying to a couple of people, you know, I've been thinking deeply about where we are with all of this and the situation going around the planet at the moment. And it occurred to me that, you know, we we are so if you take a take a triangle, there's the three points of the triangle. And the mistake that we're making is that we've got these two points here on the on the horizontal path that keep on whether it's white versus black, old versus young, whatever the thing is, we're being divided along these lines. And we're sort of focusing on that.
But the ones at the top, we need to turn it from a horizontal effort into a vertical one, where we're actually looking up instead of looking at this side. And and when we identify who the real enemy is, that's when I think we're gonna get the solutions. And it's
Speaker 2: the same each other. We should work together, and, we are all victims of the same people who are responsible for all this human suffering in the world.
Speaker 0: Well, you you you said it. I mean, we're all human beings. And regardless of what language we speak, whatever regard regardless also of old conflicts, old historical conflicts. Because there's oh, you can go back thousands of years into history. And I come from a long line of military people, and I'm a Scottish Highlander with a bit of Norwegian Viking built into me.
So, you know, a bit of a bloodthirsty lot. And there's old conflicts that go go way back. But at at this point in time, we need to understand that our enemy is not who we think it is. Our enemy are the globalists that are shaking that jar a little bit like the the jar of ants. They they put the red ants, the black ants together, then they shake it.
That causes them to fight. We've got to see past their propaganda. And I'm I'm deeply grateful to you, Anna Walter, and to Weavurn for for coming on here today. This will be going out, and be put out, probably tomorrow, certainly over the weekend. And, I would just like to say a huge thank you to each and every one of you, because it takes courage to come on and speak the way you have.
And, I would just like to ask you, Walter, would you be willing to come back on again?
Speaker 3: Yeah. Absolutely, Jim.
Speaker 0: We weren't? Would that apply to yourself as well? Yes.
Speaker 1: Of course. Pleasure was all mine. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Fantastic. And I take it you you well, let me ask you the question. Would you be willing to come back on this channel at some future point?
Speaker 2: Yeah. Of course.
Speaker 0: Fantastic. Alright. Well well, that's great to hear because I think we covered some of it, but there's an awful lot more that we could cover. And indeed, if we're going to find solutions internationally, then we do in fact need to work together. And it's important for the farmers in Holland to know they're not alone.
There is a lot of international support for them as well and also for the things that matter to each and every one of you as well. And I can assure you, you've got my support. So, there we go. So thank you one and all. And to all the people who are out there watching this, I think you're gonna find this pretty interesting.
I know I certainly have. And, I'm gonna invite these beautiful guests to come back on again and tell us a little bit more about what, they've been finding out. Indeed, Walter, when you get your website updated, I think that might be a good time for for you to come back on maybe with the other guests that are here today and discuss that further. But my thanks to each and every one of you. My thanks to all the viewers who are watching this.
As I always like to say, you folks are the real stars of this show. Thank you very much, 1 and all. This is Jim Ferguson. We'll speak soon. Bye bye.
Speaker 3: Thank you, Jim. Bye bye.
New landing page – Inspiration Station
freedomtraininternational.org
Wouter Aukema
Blog by Wouter Aukema
aukema.org
reSee.it AI Summary
Slovakia's Prime Minister is in the hospital after being shot multiple times following his announcement to investigate the government's COVID response and corruption. A video captured the aftermath of the assassination attempt, showing Fico being restrained by citizens.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Recently, Slovakia's Prime Minister made headlines around the world by saying he would criminally investigate his government's COVID response and the corrupt policies that killed his countrymen. He was just shot multiple times and is now in the hospital. Pray for his survival. https://t.co/6au9n2bkRz
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
The above speech happened on Jan 23 2024 and is important for everyone to see. This is a video that was shot today (May 15) immediately after the assassination attempt where Fico was reportedly shot in the head and abdomen. You can also see citizens restraining the gunman. https://t.co/PqoLseh8FY
@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill
“As Prime Minister of Slovakia…I can tell you that we’re going to look into these Politicians and their meaningless purchases of medical devices and vaccines and we reject the WHO Treaty…” -Slovakia PM Robert Fico who was later SHOT. https://t.co/D8rwTcAZIQ
reSee.it AI Summary
The author expresses concern about the accuracy of information regarding the vaccine. They highlight that the vaccine does not prevent the transmission of Covid and questions its safety due to limited testing. They call for an investigation into potential harms caused by the vaccine, particularly in relation to heart conditions among young men.
@robinmonotti - Robin Monotti
🇬🇧 NIGEL FARAGE TRUTH BOMB 💣 "We were told take the vaccine, the so-called "vaccine" and you won't catch Covid, take the vaccine and you won't pass Covid on, both of those things were totally, completely untrue. We were told the vaccine was safe in every way, frankly it had not been through anything like the normal testing...and now we know there are elderly pensioners on their seventh jab, that's not the kind of vaccine you and I grew up with, you have a vaccine once and were inoculated for life. So I do think there needs to be a massive investigation not just into harms that were caused by the vaccines, all vaccines cause side effects., but there does seem to be an alarming number of people, young men in particular, who have developed myocarditis and other heart conditions."
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions the safety and effectiveness of COVID vaccines, highlighting the lack of proper testing and potential side effects like myocarditis. They call for a thorough investigation into the misinformation surrounding vaccines and the unnecessary vaccination of children. The speaker criticizes the government's fear-mongering tactics and calls for a public inquiry.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No. It's dead right. It's dead right, because we need a lot there's a lot we need to know. Don't forget, Patrick. We were told, take the vaccine, the so called vaccine, right, and you won't catch COVID.
Take the vaccine and you won't pass COVID on. Both of those things were totally, completely untrue. We were told the vaccine was safe in every way. Frankly, it had not been through anything like the normal testing for any kind of vaccine in terms of trials. And now we learn that the so called vaccine do you know there are pensioners now?
Elderly people on their 7th jab. That is not the kind of vaccine you and I grew up with where you have a vaccine once and you're inoculated for life. So I do think there needs to be a massive investigation, not just into harms that were caused by the vaccine, and all vaccines cause side effects, So we know that. But there do seem to be an alarming number of people, young men in particular, who've developed myocarditis and other heart conditions. I'm not getting I'm not getting conspiratorial about this, but let's have it out in the open.
But I want to know as well why we were lied to. I want to know why they were trying to vaccinate kids of primary school age when COVID posed almost no threat to them whatsoever. And, you know, Boris Johnson and his government put in place an absolutely draconian system, not just of lockdowns, but of half a £1,000,000,000 of taxpayers' money spent on newspaper wraparounds on adverts. Remember, can you look into his eyes? If you don't take the vaccine, you'll kill your grandparents.
It all turned out to be completely untrue. This needs a proper full public inquiry. Richard is a 100% right.
@CraigKellyPHON - Craig Kelly
Justice is closing in. Romanian MEP Cristian Terheş asks why Ursula von der Leyen would sign a €71 billion contract with Pfizer to buy 4.6 billion vaccine doses (10 doses per citizen). https://t.co/WP5kOXy2MF
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ursula von der Leyen should resign as President of the European Commission due to criminal investigations into vaccine contracts. The European Public Prosecutor's Office is looking into contracts worth billions of euros for COVID-19 vaccines, signed without public disclosure. This lack of transparency is concerning for EU citizens. Resignation is necessary. Thank you.
Translation: Ursula von der Leyen should resign as President of the European Commission due to criminal investigations into vaccine contracts. The European Public Prosecutor's Office is looking into contracts worth billions of euros for COVID-19 vaccines, signed without public disclosure. This lack of transparency is concerning for EU citizens. Resignation is necessary. Thank you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mr. President, dear colleagues, Ursula von der Leyen must immediately and unconditionally resign from her position as President of the European Commission due to the fact that her actions are currently criminally investigated by the European Public Prosecutor's Office. EPPO just announced few days ago that it's investigating the way the contracts were signed between the European Commission and the producers of vaccines, and this is what the court of auditors just stated in the report released few days ago, and I quote, the commission has signed up to November 2021, 71,000,000,000 worth euros worth of contracts on behalf of the member states to purchase up to 4,600,000,000 COVID 9 19 vaccine doses. That means that she purchased 10 doses of vaccines for every EU citizen based on contracts that were never released to the public. This is how the contract that she signed with this pharmaceutical companies were released to the public.
How is this possible in the European Union that is called to be transparent with the way of using people's money? So I'm asking again and calling again for immediate and unconditional resignation. Thank you.
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that Slovakia is considering a ban on the mRNA vaccine, influenced by Peter Kotlar, the Commissioner for the Covid investigation, who is advised by Dr. Richard M. Fleming. Dr. Fleming emphasized the need for an investigation into those responsible for developing bioweapons and urged the withdrawal of these vaccines to protect Slovakians, especially children. Kotlar's press conference also highlighted Trump's potential influence, with many on his team sharing similar views on Covid.
@SaiKate108 - Kat A 🌸
They told you that Slovakia wants to ban the MRNA vaccine. What they didn’t tell you is that the Commissioner for the Covid investigation, Peter Kotlar is being advised by the esteemed Dr Richard M Fleming!! Who says that he has been approached to work as the secretary of HHS if Trump gets elected. Kotlar started his press conference with a statement from Dr Fleming highlighting the following: ‘ It is my hope that the materials provided will give you clarity so that you will have the courage to call for the investigation of the Americans through the US government responsible for evolving these bioweapons. That you will withdraw these eugenic genetic vaccines from the Slovakian population. Stopping the harm and injury occurring to Slovakians. Particularly your children. And to stand firm in your resolution to not sign the 2024 IHR and to go further with revocation of any presumed actions by the UN giving them authority over your country.’ During the conference Kotlar made several references to Trump and the fact that many on his team share the same views on Covid.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Richard Fleming, a PhD, MD, and JD, has investigated inflammatory thrombotic response diseases for decades. He was asked by Peter Kottler to provide materials to the Congress of Slovakia and Prime Minister Robert Pico regarding the origins of SARS CoV 2, eugenic genetic vaccines, and WHO international health regulations. He has provided two video presentations and two PDFs: "Is COVID 19 a Bioweapon a Scientific Forensic Investigation?" and "Are We the Next Endangered Species, Bioweapons, Eugenics, and more."
Fleming stated that he has agreed to serve as Secretary of Health and Human Services if Donald Trump is reelected and asks him to fill the role. He has provided a document outlining 20 points he would pursue as secretary, including investigating and prosecuting Americans involved in the development of the SARS CoV 2 bioweapon and withdrawing COVID-19 vaccines from the market. He would also advise Trump to revoke agreements made in 2024 within the international health regulations.
Fleming hopes the materials will encourage Slovakia to investigate those responsible for developing bioweapons, withdraw the vaccines, and refuse to sign the 2024 IHR.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello. My name is doctor Richard Fleming. I'm a PhD, MD, JD in the United States of America. I've been a physicist for 50 years, a physician for 38, and an attorney for 10. Throughout my career, I've been actively involved in trying to figure out what causes inflammatory thrombotic response diseases like heart disease, strokes, high blood pressure, diabetes, cancer, miscarriages, and a variety of other illnesses.
I've been actively involved in trying to figure out why they occur, how we can diagnose them, and how we can best treat them. As a result, four and a half years ago when SARS CoV 2 slash COVID 19 hit the scenes, I became actively involved in the investigation and research of these bioweapons and the genetic genetic vaccines. The plenipotentiary, Peter Kottler, has asked me to provide materials for the 14 of you, the Congress of Slovakia as well as mister Robert Pico, your prime minister, to discuss the topics of the origins of these viruses, eugenic genetic vaccines, and the World Health Organization slash international health rules and regulations. To that end, I have assembled 2 different video presentations, 1 on the origins and one on the eugenic genetic vaccines. Included within that has material on WHO International Health Rules and Regulations.
I have also provided 2 PDFs. One of the book known as Is COVID 19 a Bioweapon a Scientific Forensic Investigation? And the other, Are We the Next Endangered Species, Bioweapons, Eugenics, and more. It's been my pleasure to hear for several presidents in the United States, 1 vice president, and a number of members of Congress. To that end, I've had people ask me very specifically if Donald j Trump is reelected as president, becomes the 47th president of the United States, would I be willing to be the 26th secretary of health and human services?
And I've agreed to do that should Donald Trump ask me to be his secretary of health and human services. This is a position that will require someone with a science, medical, and law background and training to address. I've provided a document for doctor Peter Cutler to share with you on the 20 points that I would actively pursue as secretary of AHS. Included in that is the investigation, indictment, and prosecution of Americans involved in the funding and development of the SARS CoV 2 bioweapon. Also included is the action that I would take as secretary of HHS to immediately withdraw the eugenic genetic vaccines being used for COVID 19 from the American market.
And I would also advise president Trump to revoke any agreements made in 2024 within the international health regulations and the current actions before the UN where efforts are being made to use certain power and authority of several nations including the United States and Slovakia. It's my hope that the materials provided give you clarity so that you will have the courage to call for the investigation of the Americans through the US government responsible for developing these bioweapons, that you will withdraw these eugenic genetic vaccines from the Slovakian population, stopping the harm and injury occurring to Slovakians, particularly your children, and to stand firm in your resolution to not sign the 2024 IHR and to go further with verification of any presumed actions by the UN giving them authority over your country. It's been my pleasure to work with doctor Koller. It will be my pleasure to work with president Trump. It will be my pleasure to assist the Slovakian government in efforts for Slovakia and the United States may work together to restore the sovereignty of our nations, to protect our citizens, authorities out of the health care of Slovakian and American citizens.
Thank you.
@DrAseemMalhotra - Dr Aseem Malhotra
Why is this not headline news across the world ?!
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 #BREAKING: Florida Statewide Grand Jury finds Big Pharma engaged in a "pattern of deceptive and obfuscatory behavior" while pushing the COVID-19 vaccines to rake in billions in profit. It found that Pharma hid adverse side effects from the vaccines from the public. GOVERNOR RON DESANTIS: "The Grand Jury has made a number of recommendations that should be followed. The status quo cannot continue. The American people deserve transparency on how Big Pharma is using their federal tax dollars, and they deserve regulating entities that operate as watchdogs, not cheerleaders."
reSee.it AI Summary
Slovakia's Prime Minister, Robert Fico, boldly rejects signing the WHO Pandemic Treaty, calling it "nonsense" created by profit-driven pharmaceutical companies. He highlights the alarming consequences of mass vaccination with untested experimental vaccines. This unprecedented stance against globalist institutions like the WHO marks a significant step towards exposing the dark side of the pharmaceutical industry. Slovakia's decision is expected to trigger a series of consequential events. Video via @_aussie17. Full translation of PM Fico's speech in the comments.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Slovakia Shocks the World: New Prime Minister Rejects Signing the WHO Pandemic Treaty Prime Minister Robert Fico calls the WHO Pandemic Treaty "nonsense invented by greedy pharma companies." He also said, “One study after another confirms the scandalous consequences of mass vaccination with untested experimental vaccines.” There is no other head of state in the world who has had the guts to say this publicly and so explicitly. Slovakia is leading the world out of the dark ages of biological warfare by the pharmaceutical industry and globalist institutions like the WHO, in a move that is seen as completely unexpected. This move will set off a chain reaction of events… Video via @_aussie17 This post was a condensed version of an article written by @MakisMD (give him a follow). Read the full translation of PM Fico's speech in the comment below: