reSee.it - Related Post Feed
reSee.it AI Summary
Proof that prosecutors Fani Willis, Alvin Bragg, and Jack Smith are targeting Trump. Soros-backed attorneys funded by George Soros are prioritizing political opponents over criminals. Alvin Bragg indicted Trump without charges. Crime rates have risen under Bragg's tenure. Charges against Trump come from biased individuals. Jack Smith, a failed attorney, is also targeting Trump. Trump's charges are based on denying an election, while Democrats have done the same. Fani Willis has a history of targeting celebrities. Willis received far-left donations before prosecuting Trump. Both Willis and Smith have inconsistent legal careers. If every DA indicting Trump is compromised, it undermines their claims. Stay motivated.
@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives
THREAD: Proof that DA Fani Willis, Alvin Bragg and Jack Smith will put Donald Trump in prison for the rest of his life.
@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives
On January 22, 2023 It was revealed that George Soros invested over $40M on assisting Distract Attorneys in getting elected to target political opponents and lower the priority on criminal offenders. Soros has backed 75 prosecutors in total and 3 out of the 75 are targeting Trump
@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives
Soros-backed progressives that for the first time in history, these prosecutors have become household names whether it be St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner, Chicago’s Kim Foxx that helped Jussie Smollett, to New York’s Alvin Bragg that is targeting Trump while ignoring crime
@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives
The Color of Change PAC, the “nation’s largest online racial justice organization”, which was given $1 million in May 2021 from George Soros, gave $1 million to Bragg but pulled back half of their donation later. Alvin Bragg promised “I will pursue Trump if I get elected.”
@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives
On January 15, 2021, when Alvin Bragg was running for for DA reassuring his focus on convicting Donald Trump even though he currently had no charges, he utilized federal funds to indict Trump and the Manhattan crime rate has increased since 2021. Why would Soros fund him?
Video Transcript AI Summary
I have experience with Donald Trump as the chief deputy in the attorney general's office. We sued the Trump administration over 100 times for various issues like the Muslim travel ban, family separation at the border, and shenanigans with the census. I led the team that handled the Trump Foundation case. Holding Trump accountable is important, considering the lawlessness I've witnessed. There are two standards of justice, favoring rich, old white men like Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein, and Trump. I've seen a pattern of lawlessness over 20 years, and I believe there's a path forward to make a case based on what I've seen in the public domain.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Whoever has this job, are they going to convict Donald Trump? I'm the candidate in the race who has the experience with with Donald Trump. I was the chief deputy in the attorney general's office. We sued the Trump administration over a 100 times, for the Muslim travel ban, for family separation at the border, For shenanigans with the census, so I know how to to litigate, with him. I also led the team that did the Trump Foundation case, So, I'm ready to go wherever the facts take me and to inherit that case, and I think, you know, it'd be hard to argue the fact that that's that'd be the most important, most high profile case.
And I've seen him up front and seen the lawlessness that he can do. And you believe it should happen? You know, I I believe we have to hold them accountable. So So, yeah, the the they're they're You are right. We got a 2 standards of justice.
You know, Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein. Being a rich, old white man has allowed you to fade accountability In Manhattan. That includes Trump and his children. So I've seen a pattern of lawlessness over 20 years, and so I'm inclined to believe all I see in the public domain, and know that there's, I believe that there's a path forward there to make a case.
@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives
“Alvin Bragg has been in office just a year, but Manhattan seems to be getting progressively worse in crime," said John Lott, president of the Crime Prevention Research Center. From 2021 to 2022, Manhattan's seven major felony offenses rose by 26% to the highest since 2006
@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives
It appears that each charge against Trump comes from individuals with a vendetta against the President or seeking personal gain in exchange for ignoring the safety of their voters. President Trump appointed Donald Cochran on March 14, 2017. This position was held by Jack Smith.
@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives
Jack Smith is known as a failed attorney here in Nashville Tennessee, it doesn’t surprise us that he decided to leave home to attack President Trump, if he couldn’t complete his duty in Tennessee what makes him qualified to attack a President? 🚨Click ALT in pics for sources
@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives
With special council Jack Smith’s history with Trump and the GOP, in a fair world he would be considered a conflict of interest but we have entered a dystopian version of what America stands for, Jack Smith has over a decade of history undermining the GOP how would Trump differ?
@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives
President Trump is currently being charged on the basis of denying an election, it was completely legal to deny an election until Trump rejected results, Trump had House Reps and Senate rejecting the election, in the 2016 and 2000 election Democrats only had House Reps reject.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers in the video repeatedly claim that the 2016 election was stolen and that Donald Trump is an illegitimate president. They accuse Russia of hacking the election and express concerns about the legitimacy of Trump's victory. They mention protests and violence that occurred after the election, with some protesters vandalizing property and clashing with police. The speakers also mention petitions and calls to overturn the election results. Overall, they express anger and disbelief at Trump's presidency and question the validity of the election.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It was a stolen election. It was stolen.
Speaker 1: Stolen. He's an illegitimate president. He's an illegitimate president.
Speaker 0: You know, pretending to be president. Why do you think the president is going to such great lengths to essentially prove that he beat you? Because he didn't. 1 third of Clinton supporters say Trump election is not legitimate?
Speaker 2: I think
Speaker 0: he's an illegitimate president that didn't really win.
Speaker 1: You are absolutely right. You can run the best campaign. You can even become the nominee, and you can have the election stolen from
Speaker 2: is you?
Speaker 0: The 2016 election was stolen. Got a nicer way to say that? Say Russia hacks the election. Russia has hacked our election. Russia hacked our election.
A little louder, please. Russia hacked our election. That was a 9/11 scale is
Speaker 1: this was a kind of cyber 9/11? Cyber 9/11. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Russia hacked our election. Russia, you know, of course, hacked our election here. Half of is can's voters believe the conspiracy theory that Russia hacked election day votes?
Speaker 1: We know that they were into voting roles. Actual interference with the elections is in themselves? We know it happened.
Speaker 0: Despite no credible evidence, 67% of Democrats believe Russia tampered with vote tally. Hacking is hacking the US election? Russia hacked our elections. The Russian hacked our election. Russia hacked our election.
Russia hacked
Speaker 2: our election. Russia hacked
Speaker 0: our election. Russian hacking of our elections. Hacking of our is Of our election. Russia hacked our election. Russia hacked our elections.
Stole an election. Russia hacked our election. Russia hacked our election. Universal assessment that Russia hacked our election in is a taxpayer? Foreign government.
Act our elections. Most young Americans consider Donald Trump an illegitimate president. Illegitimate president. He's an illegitimate president. Why is still Trump?
He just won an election. He is an illegitimate president in my mind. That's it.
Speaker 2: I is
Speaker 0: I absolutely agree. Experts urge Clinton Kent to challenge election results.
Speaker 2: We will see
Speaker 1: how illegitimate his victory actually was. He's an illegitimate president.
Speaker 0: Is Russia hacked our election. Hacking our election. Hacked our election. Russia hacking our election.
Speaker 2: I don't see the
Speaker 0: president elect has a legitimate president. Trump is an legitimate president who stole the election? He is not a president. He's illegitimate. And my biggest fear is that he's gonna do it again with the help of Wadd, his best cow?
Is Out terrified. Could you be my vice president for Canada's vote? Hillary Clinton voters call to overturn election results. More than 4,000,000 people have already is petition on change .org. Calling for the electors of the electoral college to, quote, ignore their states, vote, and cast their ballots for secretary
Speaker 2: is Trump didn't actually
Speaker 0: win the election in 2016. We are the victims of a bloodless coup. He didn't won the general election. Yo. Electoral is Hollies make Hillary Clinton president, period.
Donald Trump is an illegitimate president. An illegitimate president. Don't accept is Trump as a legitimate president?
Speaker 1: This wasn't on the level. This election was not on the level.
Speaker 2: I don't
Speaker 0: think he's a legitimate president. Our election wasn't legit. He got his victory is from cheating? Yes. Trump cheated.
Trump cheated the 2016 election. He's an illegitimate president. No validity. No credibility. Mhmm.
And because of that Anger at is What some see as an illegitimate president?
Speaker 1: Stop that guy.
Speaker 0: It will not be a peaceful change of power. A number of incidents turned violent. Protesters is hurled trash cans, flash bombs, and objects at police? Several officers injured. Protesters grew rocks and smashed windows, leading to more confrontations, injuries, and arrests.
Is The chaotic scene just blocked outside the security of the inauguration. If denying election results is extreme now Yeah. Is Why don't So let's let's be really clear. That comparison that you made is just ridiculous. Protests against Donald Trump's election victory surged overnight, and is Some became violent.
Violence erupted on the streets of Portland during the 2nd straight day of protests over the election of Donald Trump. Is Some protesters launched fireworks and other projectiles at police. Several people began vandalizing cars. Is Demonstrators smashed door windows. Protesters faced off with police in other cities too, including Oakland, Denver, and Minneapolis.
Violent protests continuing now is Out for the 3rd day in a row, some 4,000 angry demonstrators over Trump's election victory taking to the street. Officers in front of thousands of protesters in what police call a
Speaker 2: is setting fires,
Speaker 0: taking their frustrations out on cars and buildings. Not my president.
Speaker 2: Not my president.
Speaker 0: Not my president. People threw projectiles at officers and is damaged property as well? I do it. Trash can't happen because I'm angry. Let's go.
1 woman driving through was is tact as someone used a bat to smash her windshield? They are undermining our democratic process, everything that we stand for.
@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives
In 2018, Democrat Stacey Abrams claimed she lost her Georgia gubernatorial race due to voter "suppression." She refused to concede. 3 years later, she told CNN that her opponent "won under the rules of the game at the time, but the game was rigged against the voters of Georgia.
Video Transcript AI Summary
This election has tested our faith. Some have tried to take our voices away, scare us, and distract us. But if we stay focused, we can see the finish line. You have inspired me every day of this campaign. I know the sacrifices you made to vote and volunteer. You put your faith in me, and tonight, I want you to know that the feeling is mutual. When we trust the people of Georgia, we can achieve anything together. Georgia still has a decision to make between division and trickery or leadership that defends our rights, our children, our careers, our communities, and our right to vote. To all Georgia voters, welcome aboard, even if I wasn't your first choice. You'll have a chance to make a difference.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This election has tested our faith. Yeah. I'm not gonna name names, but some have worked hard to take our voices away, to scare us away, to distract us. But if our vision is clear, and we see the finish line. You you have inspired me every single day of this campaign.
I know what you sacrificed to make your way to the polls, to volunteer after work or on lunch breaks. And I know that you put your faith in me. You'll do it again. Georgia, you put your faith in me, but I want you to know tonight, The feeling is mutual. And I want you to look around.
Tonight should be all the proof you need That when we put our faith in the great people of the state, there is nothing we can't accomplish together. This This this fundamental truth is why we fight on, because Georgia still has a decision to make. A decision between division and trickery. Or a leadership that defends your rights, Your kids, your career, your community, and your right to vote in America. That's what's on the ballot.
Now to all of Georgia's voters, including the 1,200,000 who haven't shown up before, welcome aboard. But I wanna say this, if I wasn't your first choice Or if you made no choice at all, you're gonna have a chance to do a do
@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives
On January 6, 2001 several House Democrats voted against certifying the election results of 2000. Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., said in a joint session: "The objection is in writing, and I do not care that it is not signed by a member of the Senate” Waters lead the floor in 2016.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Miss Waters from California rises to object to the fraudulent 25 Florida electoral votes. The objection is in writing but not signed by a senator. The chair advises that a senator's signature is required. Miss Waters mentions gross violations of the Voting Rights Act in Florida, but the objection is still not signed by a senator. The chair thanks Miss Waters but states that the objection may not be received based on the previously stated point of order.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For what purpose, does the gentlewoman from California, miss Waters, arise?
Speaker 1: Mister vice president, I rise To object to the fraudulent 25 Florida electoral votes.
Speaker 0: Is the objection, in writing and Signed by a member of the house and a senator.
Speaker 1: The objection is in writing, and I don't care that it is not it is not signed by a member of the senate.
Speaker 0: The, the chair will advise that the rules do care and, the the signature of the senator The the signature of a Senator, is required. The chair will, again put that part of the question. Is the objection assigned by a senator?
Speaker 1: Mister vice president, there are gross violations of the Voting Rights Act from Florida.
Speaker 0: The gentleman the the gentleman
Speaker 1: the act and it is not signed by a senator.
Speaker 0: The chair thanks the gentlewoman from California on the basis previously stated the point of order may not be received.
@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives
To decertify an election members of Senate and House has proceed with rejecting an election. Did you know that in the 2000 and 2016 election only House reps rejected the election? Strangely enough Rep. Maxine Waters lead the house floor for both objections. How is Trump wrong?
@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives
Finally, DA Fani Taifa Willis had President Trump as a target for the last two years, she even began targeting rappers like Young Thug and YFN Lucci to increase her credibility prior to indicting Trump. She has a history of “clout chasing’ and sleeping with celebrities in Atlanta
@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives
A source close to President Trump revealed a claim that DA Fani Williams who is trying to imprison Young Thug and Donald Trump is a conflict of interest due to allegedly having a sexual relationship with who the media claims to be Co-Founder of Young Thug’s YSL label, YSL Mondo.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a woman named Fenny Willis, who used to be their lawyer but is now a prosecutor. They mention that Fenny Willis represented them in a previous case before becoming a district attorney. The speaker believes this is a conflict of interest and questions how Fenny Willis can now try to indict them. They suggest doing a live interview to provide evidence of their claims. The speaker also mentions that someone else, possibly Kaepernick, was interviewed and told the truth. They express their belief that God works in mysterious ways.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Lady who, the Fenny Winnie, Fenny, Willie's lady. Fenny Willis. Fenny Willie lady. That was just my lawyer. I got proven facts for this.
Everybody this sounds I know everybody don't sing to you. Yeah. Fannie Willis, the the the the the d not the d. Is she the prosecutor? She's the Excuse me.
VA lady. The DA. The DA was your was your attorney at one point in time. Yes. Just before she returned the beat.
Wow. With the last case I just fought. I had just got out of jail. Yeah. For I had just got out of jail.
The last case I just fought. I was last case she was doing before she turned to being the, DA. So she switched that. She was on defense and then she went This on Wow. Honest to god So this ain't this I don't nothing that this can be hid, people.
No. Because I got the video on my page right here. Matter of fact, we should do this live interview right now to show you. So she represented you on a case right before this case that she is That's what I'm trying to tell Wow. That's the guy too.
There ain't no Kaepernick. Somebody gonna when you did interview, they also when they oh, but he wasn't lying. This already dated. Come on, man. It's just how good.
You know what I'm saying, bro? God working mysterious way. So you think that she tried use some of the things. You didn't listen to it. She can't.
That's conflicting. That's that's like conflict of interest. You were just my lawyer. So how can you turn around and try to in in in in in in in indict a for no, sir. Like, you just might use my lawyer.
@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives
Right before DA Fans Williams was elected she was flooded with far-left donations which is fairly strange when you consider how close the dates were with each contribution, it’s almost as if she was prepped to prosecute Young Thugg and President Trump. https://media.ethics.ga.gov/search/campaign/Campaign_ByContributions_RFR.aspx?NameID=28018&FilerID=C2020000305&CDRID=156252&Name=Willis,%20Fani%20Taifa&Year=2020&Report=6%20Days%20Before%20Primary%20Run-Off%20Election%20-%2008/11/2020
Campaign Reports Search | Georgia Government Campaign Finance Commission of Georgia
Georgia State Ethics Commission. Find up-to-date information on the financing of political campaigns and lobbyist expenditures, contribution limits, and more.
media.ethics.ga.gov
@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives
Just like Jack Smith, prior to attacking Trump, DA Fani Willis has an legal inconsistent career, On June 4, 2021, Fani Williams was rescued rom case against Atlanta officer in Rayshard Brooks in a Wendy’s shooting. Williams begged twice to be removed prior to the judge accepting.
@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives
DA Fani Williams begged to be removed from the case to ensure that she wouldn’t have to address the damage that her team created and to increase her chances to be eligible to indict Young Thug, YSL, YFN, and Lucci on Ricco charges which made her eligible to indict Trump on RICO
Video Transcript AI Summary
The murder case against Atlanta police officer Garrett Rolfe, who shot and killed Rayshard Brooks, is now without a prosecutor. Fulton County's new district attorney asked to be removed from the case, and a judge granted the request. The Georgia attorney general has been ordered to appoint a new prosecutor from outside the Fulton County District Office to take the case to trial. The DA's office was disqualified due to concerns over their handling of the case. The family of Rayshard Brooks hopes for a swift appointment of a new prosecutor. The attorneys for Rolfe are pleased with the decision and maintain that his use of force was justified. The second officer involved, Devin Brosnan, is still being prosecuted by the Fulton County DA's office.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And right now, the murder case against an Atlanta police officer is without a prosecutor. Fulton County's new district attorney asked to be removed from the case, and a judge is now allowing that. The officer, Garrett Rolfe, shot and killed Rayshard Brooks while trying to arrest him in a Wendy's parking lot on University Avenue.
Speaker 1: And today's announcement, it means them. The case cannot move forward, not just yet. John Sharrock is live with what's gonna happen next. John? Tonight, the case that.
Is in the hands of the Georgia attorney general. He's been ordered to step in and appoint a new prosecutor, someone from outside the Fulton County District them. Office to take this case to trial. We've seen the images repeatedly now. Miss Brooks?
Them. Hey. I'm Oscar Rolfe with the Atlanta Police Department. How you doing? Atlanta police officer Garrett Rolfe introducing himself to Rayshard Brooks.
It was June 12th the 2020. Brooks suspected of DUI. Rolfe about to handcuff Brooks. Suddenly, it all burst them. Another tragic confrontation between white officer and black suspect that in just a few seconds ended with Rolfe shooting Brooks to death.
That. Was it a case of murder or self defense? Nearly a year later, no trial yet. Them. Instead, Fulton County Superior Court chief judge Christopher Brasher has granted the DA's wish to be disqualified from the case.
That. The DA, Fonni Willis, said her office cannot be involved because her predecessor, Paul Howard the first charge is felony murder. Botched the case initially last summer them. Which Howard has denied. So judge Brasher removed the Fulton County DA's office, and now a new prosecutor from them.
Side of Fulton County will be appointed and will start on it from scratch. And it hurt. It hurt really bad. The attorneys for Brooks' family Say they hope the new prosecutor will be appointed soon. The family of Rayshard Brooks has been through so much during this process.
That. The numerous stops and starts have been gut wrenching and have made it even more difficult for this grieving family to find peace. That. The attorneys for Rolfe say they're glad the Fulton County DA's office is off the case. We welcome this order.
We continue to maintain that that. Daroff's use of deadly force was legally justified, and we look forward to his complete exoneration. The state attorney general has not said yet when he will appoint the new prosecutor. As for the 2nd officer accused in this case, Devin Brosnan, them. He was not part of today's order from the judge.
So apparently, as of now, the Fulton County DA's office is still responsible for prosecuting Brosnan them. On charges that include aggravated assault.
Speaker 0: Alright. John Sherrick, lots of layers to that story. Thank you so much.
@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives
If every DA indicting President Trump is compromised and if Democrats were able to use politicians, celebrities, and every type of media they owned to accuse President Trump of stealing the 2016 election with Russia it will hurt their witching in discovery. Stay motivated!
@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives
I want to thank everyone for their support and most importantly believing in me, your trust is everything. For everyone looking for all of my THREADS or donation info, I will add the link below. THANK YOU FOR EVERYTHING. I can't express how much I love you https://www.creditcadabra.com/dom-lucre-twitter-thread-collection/
Dom Lucre Twitter Thread Collection
You requested it, here it is! Here are all of my threads and donation info, thank you so much for pushing me and holding me accountable. All of your ti
creditcadabra.com
@LeadingReport - Leading Report
BREAKING: Bombshell investigation uncovers Fulton County DA Fani Willis has been involved in a multi-state network of illicit operations involving wire fraud, evasion of campaign finance limits, structuring of financial transactions, tax fraud, non profit fraud, identity theft, and elder abuse.
@TaraBull808 - TaraBull𝕏
Fani Willis funneled nearly $1 MILLION in taxpayer dollars to her lover, attorney Nathan Wade, whom she appointed as a 'special prosecutor' in her case against Trump. Wade allegedly used the funds for extravagant vacations, authorized directly by Willis. https://t.co/S4D5kltOHb
Video Transcript AI Summary
President Trump's case in Georgia is facing a sex scandal involving the district attorney, Fannie Willis. She is accused of appointing her lover, Nathan Wade, as a special prosecutor in the case against Trump. Wade, who has limited experience in high-profile cases, has already been paid nearly $1 million in legal fees. These payments were authorized by Willis using taxpayer money. They have allegedly enjoyed luxury vacations together and Willis does not deny hiring someone she is romantically involved with to prosecute the case.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sex scandal is rocking president Trump's case in Georgia. The Fulton County Georgia district attorney, Fannie Willis, has been accused of appointing her lover as a special prosecutor in the case against Donald Trump. DA Fannie Willis is responsible for taking Trump's mugshot. Also, allegedly, financially benefited from hiring her lover, Nathan Wade on that Trump case. This is according to a motion that was just filed by Wade, the codefendant.
Now who is this romantic partner who Fannie Willis hired? He was just a private attorney. He's never even tried a felony case. Even the Times says he has, quote, limited experience trying high profile cases. But get this, Fannie's alleged lover, has been paid nearly $1,000,000 in legal fees already.
Who authorized the payments? Oh, that would be Fannie. Where'd she get the money? Oh, that's your money. Came from the taxpayers.
They've allegedly gone on luxury vacations to Napa Valley, even taking Caribbean cruises. And Fannie isn't even denying that she's hired a guy she's sleeping with to prosecute
@4Mischief - • ᗰISᑕᕼIᗴᖴ ™ •
Fani Willis, Nathan Wade, Jack Smith and the Biden White House have some explaining to do for their collaboration on the fraudulent prosecution of President Trump https://t.co/pPkx1U19KZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses allegations that a prosecutor investigating Donald Trump in Georgia had an affair and used state funds to pay for it. They highlight the potential corruption and unfairness of the situation, both legally and in the court of public opinion. The speaker also mentions the possibility of collaboration between the prosecutor and Joe Biden's White House, raising new questions. They note that the prosecutor refused to answer questions about his communication with others involved in the case. The speaker predicts that Donald Trump will likely comment on this issue.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It looks like he met with the Department of with just Department of Justice officials with the White House. If this is in fact true, and we've seen the invoices in the daily mail that he invoiced to be paid this. Not only is he having affair using state money, paying 600,000, where you got paid $600,000 and they're going on vacation together. But this is also interesting because you can no longer get denied. There's some collaboration between the prosecution of Donald Trump and Joe Biden's White House.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Assuming this is true, this is a problem from a public corruption standpoint, for sure, which is ironic because I believe his title includes something about being the anti corruption Prosecutor looking at Donald Trump. And, you know, certainly, from a legal perspective, it raises questions of corruption for. An unfair process potentially. But in the court of public opinion, it's even more problematic, especially if he went to the White White House for 2, I believe, 8 hour meetings according to these receipts, these expenditures.
And about what? Because his job is investigating Trump with respect to Georgia. For. And, you know, we're waiting to hear from the White House what they have to say about this because I believe in the past, they have denied collaboration with any of these entities looking into Trump, for. And this raises new questions for sure.
Speaker 0: She wouldn't answer the question, Fannie Willis. When asked, are you talking to Jack Smith about this case? Have you ever spoken to him about this case? She would not answer. That tells you a lot.
Mhmm. Donald Trump will probably be posting about this at some point today.
@4Mischief - • ᗰISᑕᕼIᗴᖴ ™ •
Rob Schmitt gives a great description of the Fani Willis booty call fiasco in the Fulton County DA’s office and the Biden administration involvement https://t.co/24LWZEPJfc
Video Transcript AI Summary
Opposition research firm Marco Polo released unverified documents alleging that private attorney Nathan Wade, appointed by Fannie Willis as a special prosecutor, billed Fulton County for two meetings with the White House. Wade supposedly charged $250 per hour for his services during these meetings, one in May and another in November 2022, shortly after Donald Trump announced his presidential candidacy. This evidence suggests a conspiracy by the White House to undermine Joe Biden's primary opponent in the 2024 election. Such suspicions have been long-held in the four cases against Trump, although they have always been denied.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, opposition research firm Marco Polo released some incredible documents that are as of yet still unverified by Newsmax, but we're working on it. They show Fannie Willis' hand selected special prosecutor, private attorney Nathan Wade, allegedly billing Fulton County for 2 meetings with the White House. $250 an hour for his services. One of those meetings in May, and then one in November of 2022, just 3 days after Donald Trump announced his candidacy for president. It's evidence the White House is engaged in a conspiracy to take down Joe Biden's primary 2024 opponent.
Something that has long been suspected in all four Cases against Donald Trump, but also has always been denied.
reSee.it AI Summary
Chair of the House Judiciary Committee, Jim Jordan, is launching an inquiry into Nathan Wade, who has been paid over $650,000 of taxpayer money as a Special Assistant District Attorney to prosecute Donald Trump in Fulton County. Wade, a private attorney with no felony case experience, billed Fulton County for meetings with the White House, raising suspicions of collaboration with the White House Counsel's office. There are also allegations of lavish vacations taken by Wade and Fani Willis, including trips to Napa Valley and the Caribbean.
@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk
🚨BREAKING: Chair of the House Judiciary Committee Jim Jordan launches inquiry into Fani Willis' lover, Nathan Wade, after it was revealed he has been paid over $650,000 of taxpayer money to act as Special Assistant District Attorney to prosecute Donald Trump in Fulton County. Wade, a private attorney, has never prosecuted a felony case before. Wade also billed Fulton County for at least two meetings with the White House, expenses that were directly approved by Fani Willis, raising suspicions that the prosecution is being done in collaboration with the White House Counsel's office. The two are also alleged to have taken lavish vacations together including trips to Napa Valley and the Caribbean. This is big.
@greg_price11 - Greg Price
🚨NEW: This is a clip of Fani Willis from 2020 where she says she would fire any employee who sleeps with a co-worker, promises to not date “anybody that works under me,” and said it would be “unfortunate” if taxpayers had to fund sex misconduct lawsuits https://t.co/tEUTM8DVEJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's saddening if young women feel judged or uncomfortable at work. I won't tolerate supervisors who don't support and uplift my staff. I won't date anyone who works under me. Society understands that relationships can happen, but citizens are concerned about inappropriate contact with employees. It's distracting and inappropriate for the top law enforcement officer. It saddens me, and it would be unfortunate if taxpayers had to pay for lawsuits. That's how I feel too.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's, it is saddening to me if young women felt like they came to work and they were 1, even judged for being a woman. But 2, if certainly they felt uncomfortable within the workplace. Mhmm. That will not be something that is allowed on my watch. Supervisors under my leadership that are not encouraging and building up my staff will not be supervisors long in my administration.
And, I certainly will not be choosing people to date that work under me. Let let me just say that, you know, we are at a place in Society where things happen in people's relationships, husband and wife, sometimes there are outside relationships. I don't think that that's what the community is concerned about. Although there, you know, there might be a a moral breaking in that. I think that what citizens are really, really concerned about is if you chose to have inappropriate contact with employees.
I mean, there's nothing that I can say on it other than it is distracting. It is certainly inappropriate for the number one law enforcement officer in state. And it just it it really, really saddens me and it will be very unfortunate if the taxpayers of this community have to pay for any of those lawsuits. Exactly. That's the way I feel about it also.
reSee.it AI Summary
Fani Willis, in a 2020 clip, expressed concern about taxpayers paying for affairs between elected officials. However, she is now accused of having an affair with a married man she hired to prosecute Trump. Some question her credibility and honesty.
@TaraBull808 - TaraBull
Oh, what do we have here A clip of Fani Willis from 2020 saying how unfortunate it would be if taxpayers had to pay for affairs between elected officials. This is the same woman accused of sleeping with a married man she hired for top dollar to prosecute Trump. Does this woman do anything other than lie?
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's concerning if young women feel judged or uncomfortable at work. I won't tolerate that as a leader. Supervisors who don't support and uplift their staff won't last in my administration. I won't date anyone who works under me either. Society has relationships, but the community is more concerned about inappropriate contact with employees. It's distracting and inappropriate for the top law enforcement officer in the state. It saddens me, and it would be unfortunate if taxpayers had to pay for lawsuits. That's how I feel about it too.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's saddening to me if young women felt like they came to work and they were, 1, even judged for being a woman. But, 2, if certainly they felt uncomfortable within the workplace. Mhmm. That will not be something that is allowed on my watch. Supervisors under my leadership that are not encouraging and building up my staff will not be supervisors long in my administration.
And, I certainly will not be choosing people to date that work under me. Let let me just say that. You know, we are at a place in society where things happen in people's relationships, She has husband and wife. Sometimes there are outside relationships. I don't think that that's what the community is concerned about.
Although there, you know, there might be a a moral breaking in that. I think that what citizens are really, really concerned about is if you chose to have inappropriate contact with employees. I mean, there's nothing that I can say on it other than it is distracting. It is certainly inappropriate for the number one law enforcement officer in the state. And it just it it really, really saddens me.
And it will be very unfortunate if the taxpayers of this community have to pay for any of those lawsuits. Exactly. That's the way I feel about it also.
@ByronYork - Byron York
Whistleblower said Willis' office was using federal 'youth empowerment and gang prevention' money for 'swag,' computers, and travel. Willis did not deny. Then she fired the whistleblower.
@AndrewKerrNC - Andrew Kerr
Fani Willis Axed Employee Who Blew Whistle on Misuse of Federal Funds https://freebeacon.com/democrats/fani-willis-axed-employee-who-blew-whistle-on-misuse-of-federal-funds/
Fani Willis Axed Employee Who Blew Whistle on Misuse of Federal Funds
Fani Willis may have fired the employee who warned her about mishandling federal funds. But she didn't deny her allegations.
freebeacon.com
@alexbruesewitz - Alex Bruesewitz 🇺🇸
BREAKING: @FreeBeacon has obtained audio of a whistleblower telling Fani Willis that her top aide was misusing federal funds. Instead of firing the top aide, she fired the whistleblower. Fani Willis is as crooked as they come!!! Credit: @AndrewKerrNC https://t.co/EoPGU0gC1P
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explains how they confronted Mr. Cuffy about his lack of leadership and unrealistic plans for a specific grant. They were then taken off projects and falsely accused of not doing their job because they questioned him. The speaker also mentions that Mr. Cuffy is dangerous to the administration and shares a personal opinion about him. They express feeling unsafe and not having a good relationship with their supervisors. The speaker is reassured that they are safe to go to certain places.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you had to give me a sentence, what is the sentence saying?
Speaker 1: Once I told him about his respectfully and in the email about his lack of leadership and the fact that he wanted to do things with grants that were impossible. And I kept telling him, like, we can't do that in questioning stuff. He would take me off projects, tell people I wasn't doing what I was supposed to because I questioned him. Because I understood. I helped write that grant.
I knew what was in that grant. He told everybody in front of Crystal, Deontay, everybody. We're gonna get Macbooks, we're gonna do that. We're gonna get swag. We're gonna use it for travel.
I said, you cannot do that. It's a very, very specific grant. Took me off. I questioned junior DA. There's kids in there from out of the the, the county, all this.
Took me off junior DA. I did not to do it, he made it look as if I wasn't doing what I needed to do because I questioned him. Because I knew for a fact, mister Cusi respectfully did not know what he was doing. Period.
Speaker 0: So I respect that as your assessment. It was clear to me that you and miss Cuppy were not getting along. And I'm not saying that your assessment is wrong. I want you to really listen to the words I'm saying.
Speaker 1: Pussy, and this is my personal opinion to one woman to another is dangerous to your administration. He tells people, when I reached out to you, he told me, oh, you think your word is safe? Exactly when you reached out to miss, Willis, she called me and told me. She told me everything. So once you reach out to her, she's gonna reach back out to me.
So I didn't even go to HR. He put Dexter's name on my PDP and I didn't even feel safe going to anybody.
Speaker 0: Can I tell you something? Mhmm. I have 3 supervisors that have failed in the field. What's interesting to me because I'm in learning for a term, they each pretend to have a relationship with me that they do not have. I guess that's an intimidate to tactic.
Mhmm. I'm sorry that you felt that way, but you would that's just certainly don't have no relationship with, right, Michael Cuffy. You were safe to go those places.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
🚨Whistleblower CATCHES Fulton County DA Fani Willis ON-TAPE stealing grant money, then launching coverup plot— THIS is who is prosecuting TRUMP?! https://t.co/5xqfIJFrMt
Video Transcript AI Summary
Lover boy finalizes divorce to be with Fannie, but they face subpoenas regarding their actions together. Fanny's office has a whistleblower, Amanda Timpson, who recorded Fanny's aide, Michael Kufi, allegedly misusing federal grant money. The whistleblower confronted Fanny about it. Fanny fired the whistleblower, claiming she didn't meet her standards. It seems that Fanny's office has a pattern of using public money for personal expenses, such as trips and swag. It's worth noting that Fanny is involved in prosecuting Trump.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've got an update in the lover boy, Fannie Willow saga. Lover boy finalizes divorce so he could run away with Fannie, but then Fanny and Lover Boy got hit with subpoenas and have to testify about their shenanigans together. And when it rains it pours. Fanny's office has a whistleblower, and the whistleblower recorded Fanny. And the free beacon gave the recording the prime time.
The whistleblower, Amanda Timpson, says she caught Fanny's aide stealing money. Fanny's office got a federal grant for half a $1,000,000. It was supposed to go to gang prevention. But Fanny's aide, Michael Kufi, allegedly blew the money on travel, computers, and swag. The whistleblower confronted Fanny and recorded it.
Speaker 1: He wanted to do things with grants that were Impossible. And I kept telling him, like, we can't do that and questioning stuff. He would take me off projects, tell people I wasn't doing what I was supposed to because I Questioned him because I understood. I helped to write that grant. I knew what was in that grant.
He told everybody, we're gonna get Macbooks, we're gonna do that. We're gonna get swag. We're gonna use it for travel. I said you cannot do that. It's a very, very specific grant.
So I respect that as your assessment. It was clear to me that you and Succapi were not getting along. And I'm not saying that your assessment is wrong.
Speaker 0: So what'd Fanny do next? Fired the whistleblower. 7 armed men escorted her out of the office. Fannie said the whistleblower didn't meet her standards and Fannie's aide denies he stole swag. But do we sense a pattern here?
Fannie's office takes public money, hires unqualified people, and the money gets spent on trips and swag. This is the woman who's prosecuting Trump.
@Techno_Fog - Techno Fog
New details alleged against Fulton County DA Fani Willis- Witnesses will testify she "cohabitated" with Nathan Wade (despite her denials) at her home The relationship began in 2019 - 3 years before Willis/Wade says it began, and before Wade's 2021 appointment https://t.co/vv8K1zIL9R
@PhilHollowayEsq - Phil Holloway ✈️
BREAKING 🚨🚨 Trump Co-Defendant offers eyewitness proof that Fulton DA #FaniWillis lied to the court "Special Prosecutor" Wade's former law partner will testify the love affair began before Willis was sworn in as DA Willis stated it was only in 2022 that the affair began
@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk
BREAKING: A friend of Fulton County’s “Get Trump” DA, Fani Willis, testifies that the illicit affair between Fani and secret lover Nathan Wade began in 2019. Earlier reports suggested the affair started in 2022. https://t.co/s5L3cQdo87
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker confirms that the personal aspect mentioned earlier refers to a romantic relationship. They also clarify that this relationship started in 2019 and lasted until their last conversation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What personal and romantic is later. When I ask you personal, do you take that to mean romantic? Yes. And do you understand it that their relationship began in 2019 and Continued until the last time you spoke with her? Yes.
@ChuckCallesto - Chuck Callesto
JUST IN: ⚠️ MSNBC legal analyst says Fani Willis’ CREDIBILITY IS SHOT.. “It’s about LYING TO THE COURT, it's about potential financial gain on the part of Fani Willis... her credibility is shot... it's a horrible, horrible look for her.” https://t.co/xgdxsAIEQE
Video Transcript AI Summary
This is a bombshell revelation with huge implications. The issue at hand is not about a consensual relationship, but rather about lying to the court and potential financial gain. The speaker emphasizes that the credibility of the person in question is severely damaged. If she submitted false and inaccurate information to the court, what else has she lied about? This situation looks very bad for her, and the speaker believes the case is unlikely to succeed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. This this has been a bombshell, and it was a slow a sort of a slow burn, but, if you if you parse the language, huge, huge issues here. And I wanna be really clear. This is not about a relationship between 2 consenting adults. This has nothing to do with that.
It's about lying to the court. It's about potential financial gain on the part of finding those. And not not even so much. That's that's a second that takes the back seat here. The issue is that her credibility is shot.
Just as Anthony was saying, if she lied to the court, she submitted something to the court that she knew was false and inaccurate, what else was clear it. What else was she lying about? It's a horrible, horrible look for her. I think this case is dead in the water.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
🚨Top GOP investigator Jim Jordan sends “Big Fani” Willis into a PANIC: "There's a whistleblower in her office who we have talked to." https://t.co/mo3FsLxsH2
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 mentions waiting for Bonnie Willis to respond. They discuss a whistleblower in her office who raised concerns about misuse of funds. Willis fired the whistleblower, prompting a subpoena for related documents. Willis made US Marshals serve the subpoena. They joke about Willis' behavior and mention CPAC. They express appreciation for CPAC's support of conservative principles.
Translation: The speakers discuss Bonnie Willis not responding, a whistleblower's concerns, a subpoena for documents, and Willis' behavior. They joke about CPAC and express gratitude for its support of conservative principles.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm not sure if Jimmy Kimmel understood what the title of this conversation is. What you talking about? Willis, Bonnie Willis. Did she get back to you today?
Speaker 1: Yeah, we said, Peter, not yet. I just talked with you.
Speaker 0: Where is she supposed to get back to
Speaker 1: you today? Yeah, she's supposed to get documents. Well, did you hear from her boyfriend? We haven't. So some I was talking about this in the office, and I said Fonnie Wade, and this is like a Freudian slip, you know, like Fonnie Willis and Nathan Wade.
So, I know we haven't heard back from her yet. We'll see what we get from her. But there's a whistleblower in her office who we have talked to, the committee staff. Yeah. And she, the whistleblower, I think she's like 4 foot 11, but Fani Willis had 7 police escort her out when she fired this lady, because this lady raised the concern that Ms.
Willis was not spending federal funds and not following the grant the rules of the grant and the grant dollars in the appropriate manner. So she raised this concern, and then finally, Will has fired her. She's now talking with our office, and we'll see where that goes. And that's why we subpoenaed for records and documents related to this. We'll see what we get.
There's still a few hours left in today. She also was interesting. She instead of accepting service on the subpoena, she made us send the US Marshals. Even though our office had talked with her office, we've had correspondence back and forth, She made the US Marshals take the subpoena there, so go figure. This is Bonnie Willis, and we all saw her, I think her attitude on display when she took the studio.
Speaker 0: I thought it was a skit, but I think it actually was real life. It was real. We sent out a tweet that said we didn't invite Fawnee Willis to CPAC, but there is a Fawnee sandwich with the chaser of Grey Goose Vodka. If you have enough cash, ready cash in your pocket.
Speaker 1: Yeah. The comedy routine from Mr. Slap coming out today, that's awesome.
Speaker 0: It's been a long year, Jay.
Speaker 1: Well, we appreciate what you do. We appreciate what CPAC has meant for conservative principles for a long, long time. Thank you. It means a lot.
@WendellHusebo - Wendell Husebø
EXCLUSIVE:💰Former Biden Aide Paid Fani Willis’s Deputy DA Jeff DiSantis $131K in 2023 The money significant due to @BreitbartNews sources who say DiSantis is a Biden plant inside a Fulton County office to target Trump https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/02/29/exclusive-former-biden-aide-paid-fani-williss-deputy-jeff-disantis-131k-2023/
Exclusive: Fmr. Biden Aide Paid Fani Willis’s Deputy DA $131K in 2023
The Biden administration planted DiSantis inside a Fulton County office to target Trump, according to sources.
breitbart.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Fulton County's Deputy District Attorney, Jeff DiSantis, received over $131,000 for consulting services from Rep. Gabriel Amo, a former Biden White House aide. DiSantis's payments were previously undisclosed, and it is noteworthy that he contracted with Amo, who worked closely with local elected officials. Sources suggest that DiSantis, a wealthy and successful Democrat operative, may be a Biden plant targeting former President Trump. DiSantis's professional experience and fundraising abilities raise questions about his motivations for taking a prosecutorial job. The timing of changes to his consulting firm's registration is also suspicious, occurring just before important court filings and testimonies.
@WylieGuide - 🇺🇸 Rich Howard 🇺🇸
Democrat operative and Fulton County’s Deputy District Attorney Jeff DiSantis received four payments totaling $131,335 for providing consulting services to Rep. Gabriel Amo (D-RI), a former Biden White House aide who worked with local elected officials, Federal Election Commission records show. The money flow is significant because sources with direct knowledge of Fulton County’s office told Breitbart News DiSantis is a Biden plant inside a Fulton County office to target former President Donald Trump. DiSantis’ payments were previously unreported. DiSantis was working at county DA’s office while operating a consulting firm named “20/20 Insights, LLC.” Sources told Breitbart News deputy district attorneys would likely have to sign an oath that prohibits them from working outside their county employment agreement. DiSantis’s oath, if he signed one, remains undisclosed. It is also curious that DiSantis contracted with Amo, who worked in the Biden administration as the deputy director of the White House Office of Intergovernmental Affairs before running for Congress in 2023. There he worked as the principal liaison to mayors and “local elected officials,” according to his White House bio. Amo also served as an adviser on President Joe Biden’s 2020 campaign and later served on his transition team. “That is the connection to the White House,” one source told Breitbart News. “DiSantis did this. He’s the one. He is the one pulling all the strings. He was the one that walled her [Willis] off. He was in every important meeting. He is the brainchild behind this.” DiSantis is a wealthy and successful Democrat operative. He ran Willis’ 2020 campaign and raised $4 million dollars. “He had over $4 million in donations for running the district attorney’s race,” one source told Breitbart News about DiSantis’s fundraising. “Why would you want to take a major pay cut to get a $70,000 or $80,000 prosecutorial job?” the source asked. “I have no idea why.” DiSantis has professional experience far greater than the average county employee. He was the former Executive Director of the Democrat Party of Georgia with extensive knowledge of campaign finance law. He was also the Deputy Director of Compliance for the DNC, according to his official bio: Jeff has also worked for candidates in 30 states running for a variety of offices, including President of the United States, United States Senator, Governor, United States Representative, Attorney General, District Attorney, and Mayor, as well as for a national political party committee. He has served as a campaign manager, media consultant, pollster, press spokesman, research director, and policy advisor. DiSantis founded 20/20 Insights, LLC in 2010, and he was the registered agent for the company until this month. On February 2, 2024, the company replaced his name as the registered agent with Christopher Huttman, DiSantis’ business partner. The timing of the change is suspicious. 20/20 Insights, LLC replaced DiSantis as the registered agent just weeks before Willis testified about her affair with fellow Trump prosecutor, Nathan Wade, and two days after a court filing alleging Willis’ romantic relationship with Wade. As Breitbart News exclusively reported, “Wade is a prosecutor on the Trump case and he selected the office employees,” a source told Breitbart News. Wade was a key decision-maker on which employees to hire or fire in the DA’s office following her election victory in November 2020, according to multiple sources familiar with the Wade and Willis relationship. https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/02/29/exclusive-former-biden-aide-paid-fani-williss-deputy-jeff-disantis-131k-2023/
Exclusive: Fmr. Biden Aide Paid Fani Willis’s Deputy DA $131K in 2023
The Biden administration planted DiSantis inside a Fulton County office to target Trump, according to sources.
breitbart.com
reSee.it AI Summary
A recent investigation has uncovered potential election fraud and money laundering involving Fani Willis. The investigation found 222 campaign contributions to Willis with no donor information, many of which were from out-of-state elderly individuals. One elderly person denied ever making a contribution to Willis' campaign when contacted.
@JDunlap1974 - 🇺🇸🇺🇸Josh Dunlap🇺🇲🇺🇲 ULTRA-MAGA
🚨🚨 BREAKING: New investigation reveals Fani Willis was involved in a multi-state election fraud & money laundering enterprise The investigators identified in the Fani Willis campaign finance report 222 contributions to her campaign that had ZERO donor information. Many of the donors were out-of-state elderly people. When contacted about making campaign contributions to Fani Willis, one of the elderly people on the list stated that she had never made a single campaign finance contribution to her campaign.
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
Here’s Fani Willis testifying under oath that her relationship with special prosecutor Nathan Wade ended months ago. Here she is yesterday showing up with Nathan when her daughter got arrested. Did Fani lie under oath? https://t.co/H6T8sWXwN7
Video Transcript AI Summary
The physical relationship ended pre-indictment, but the "tough conversation" may have happened after. A man would say the relationship ended in June or July when physical contact ended, but a woman might say it's over when the hard conversation occurs.
To a man, the romantic relationship ended before the indictment. The forthcoming indictment had absolutely nothing to do with the end of the relationship.
Arguments occurred because Mr. Wade is used to women who can only make him a sandwich, while she believes she is his equal and doesn't need anything from a man. She was giving him his money back because she doesn't need anyone to foot her bills; only her father has ever done that.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ended, you left it at August of 2023. That sound right?
Speaker 1: That's the hard conversation. That's not the, mhmm.
Speaker 0: We've covered this. Next question. And you characterize it as a tough conversation. Correct?
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: Okay. I'm not gonna get into the conversation per
Speaker 1: se. Should.
Speaker 0: Well, he doesn't want to, we won't go there. So, mister Sadat, next question. You know, it's kinda hard to say no when you've got that opportunity. All I'm gonna say is it was it pre indictment in this case? So We know the timeline that the indictment was delivered.
Speaker 1: Oh, but and and and so that was clear, the physical relationship ended preindictment.
Speaker 0: And is that when you were talking about the tough conversation?
Speaker 1: But the I'm not sure that the tough conversation didn't happen till after, but the physical relationship so I'm sure if you ask mister Wade, because he's a male, he would say we ended June or July because physical contact ended then. Just in my mind being a woman, it's over when you have that, like, hard conversation. That's I just think women and men think differently.
Speaker 0: And I think the answer, mister Sadler, to your question was she's not sure whether it was before or after the indictment. Well, I'm not I'm not sure that that was her answer, but but to see if I can get specific.
Speaker 1: That is what I said. That's what I said.
Speaker 0: I'll let you next question, mister Sato. If you need to clarify say one more? The romantic relationship ended before the indictment was returned. Yes or no?
Speaker 1: To a man, yes.
Speaker 0: To a man, yes. Do you know? She's explained this. Why don't you say it now? She's explained this.
And did the and the did the forthcoming indictment have anything to do with that, or was it just a coincidence?
Speaker 1: Mister, let's go on and have the conversation.
Speaker 0: I'm just asking you whether or not it was a coincidence.
Speaker 1: Absolutely nothing to do with this. It's interesting that we're here about this money. Mister Wade is used to women that, as he told me one time, the only thing a woman can do for him is make him a sandwich. We would have brutal arguments about the fact that I am your equal. I don't need anything from a man.
A man is not a plan. A man is a companion. And so there was tension always in our relationship, which is why I was give him his money back. I don't need anybody to foot my bills. The only man who's ever foot my bills completely is my daddy.
Speaker 0: Is there anything else you would like to add to that?
Speaker 1: No. Sure. But I'm sure we'll talk about it further.
Speaker 0: No. We're not gonna talk about it further. I'd Alright. No back and forth. Let's sit down.
Next question. My
Video Transcript AI Summary
A woman was pulled over and found to have a suspended license, but the reason for the suspension is unknown. She is being taken to Fayette County Jail at 145 Johnson Avenue in Fayetteville. The process will likely take a couple of hours, depending on how busy they are. Driving on a suspended license is a traffic citation. She will have to have her fingerprints and picture taken before making bond, which can be paid in cash or through a bondsman for 10%. The vehicle is registered to her, and the system indicated her license was invalid. It is generally assumed that the registered owner is the driver. After processing, she can make a couple of phone calls. The fine for driving on a suspended license is estimated to be around $1200, but this varies by municipality.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Couple hours, probably. Mom, dad, who's looking?
Speaker 1: Disappointed. Okay. Okay. Mommy, nice to meet you. So for my pleasure.
To meet you.
Speaker 0: What So, apparently Oh.
Speaker 1: The lights is Apparently, her license
Speaker 0: is suspended.
Speaker 1: It's been. Okay. For something.
Speaker 0: Doesn't tell us what board or why or where or that's something she's gonna have to call DMV.
Speaker 1: Right. Right?
Speaker 0: Probably what happened, she had a speeding ticket. Some kind of driving attraction. Everyone in court didn't take care
Speaker 1: of it. Right.
Speaker 0: That's the best guess. So she's gone over to Fayette County Jail, which is right in the Fayetteville Square. Mhmm. It's 145 Johnson Avenue. Yeah.
Normally, I would say a couple hours is the process. It just depends on how busy they are and like that. Okay? The driving on the suspended is basically a traffic citation. She's gotta have her fingerprints done and picture taken, then she can make her bond.
And you pay cash, use a bondsman, be 10%, whatever. They've got a list of people over there too that you can choose from and use
Speaker 1: for whatever she's got.
Speaker 0: So the vehicle's registered, excuse me, registered to her. Yes, sir. I don't know if it was on a plot kit or if the officer observed some kind of traffic interaction. It wasn't me. I didn't make the truck stop.
He's already gone to guard going. Alright. So whatever the case may be, when you run the the tag, it obviously gives us the vehicle information and the registered owner. Okay. And it's already in the system that she's has invalid license yet.
So upon that, we just verify that it is that person driving or stop the car first at that point. We don't have to notice them. It's general assumption that the registered owner is the driver of the vehicle. Yeah. You know, if you stop it
Speaker 1: and it's not. Okay.
Speaker 0: Have a nice day. But, in this case, she was.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So this are the keys to the car here?
Speaker 0: Yes. Yeah. Everything's here. Yeah. Everything's in there.
Speaker 2: She has three numbers, I believe, she gave. Is it your number? JC, third name, I didn't get. She'll allow to make would
Speaker 1: she'll have to get 3 Yeah. Once Well, the the I'm just gonna start with the car. Yeah. Once Although the I'm just gonna go to the car.
Speaker 0: Once they get the process done, she can make a couple phone calls and call you guys and say, okay. I'm ready. This is how much it is. Whatever. I wanna say off the top of my head, I think driving on suspended license is about $1200.
Yeah. Somewhere right in that area. Every municipality is different, you know, give or take a little bit, but somewhere around there. So Alright.
Speaker 1: Thank you
Speaker 0: so much. You're welcome. Any other questions?
reSee.it AI Summary
I discovered that Fani Willis' office has been caught in another lie regarding payments made from a seizure fund. An attorney revealed that there were substantial payments to her boyfriend, Nathan Wade, and other lawyers from this fund, contradicting the office's claims that no payments were made from it. They previously stated it was a clerical error and insisted they keep the fund low. The evidence presented, including screenshots, raises serious questions about the integrity of the district attorney's office.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
Fani Willis Fulton County District Attorney Office caught lying again Georgia Attorney finds “More mysterious payments by Fani Willis’ office” 🚨 ADDITIONAL payments to her boyfriend Nathan Wade “There were substantial payments made out of this seizure fund” a fund they said payments weren’t being made out of (screenshots on video as proof) “We see not only payments to Nathan Wade, but payments to other lawyers out of this same fund — So I'm very confused about why the district attorney's office would say, oh, it's a clerical error. We don't pay lawyers out of this fund. We keep the fund low, when not only did they pay Nathan Wade, they paid some of the other lawyers out of this same fund” - Georgia Criminal Defense Attorney Megan Grout
Video Transcript AI Summary
I investigated payments made to attorneys from the civil forfeiture fund related to Young Thug's property confiscation. Just eight days after the action was filed, Nathan Wade, Fannie Willis' boyfriend, received multiple payments from this fund. In response to inquiries from Newsweek, Fulton County claimed it was a clerical error and that the fund was kept low, making attorney payments unlikely. However, I found substantial payments made from the fund, including to Wade and other lawyers in 2022. This contradicts the district attorney's statement, raising questions about their claims. The Fulton County District Attorney's Office needs to clarify this situation, and I will continue to investigate.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, everyone. I did a little bit more digging on this whole payment to attorneys out of the civil forfeiture fund. If you remember my prior video, that got a lot of attention, we saw that only 8 days after the Fulton County District Attorney's Office filed the civil forfeiture action to confiscate and keep Young Thug's property, Nathan Wade, who's Fannie Willis' boyfriend, was paid multiple times out of the civil forfeiture fund. Now, when Newsweek got ahold of this information back in March of 2024, they inquired with Fulton County as to why that would be that he was, being paid out of the civil forfeiture fund. And they got a response that said that it was a clerical error, a data entry error, and that the funds are kept so low that they would never pay a, an attorney out of of that fund.
So, I went back and I just looked. I searched open checkbook, which again, all of you can do, and I narrowed it to payments by the district attorney's office out of the forfeiture fund. And here's what I found. These are actual screenshots from my laptop. Again, anybody can do this, can search this yourself.
You don't have to be a lawyer. It doesn't cost anything. And as you can see through each of these different screenshots, and you can pause them to read them, what we're seeing is there were substantial payments made out of the seizure fund, when they actually had said that it was kept very low. A few of these payments appear to be for some kind of renovations, but, and then Dell presumably is, you know, computer equipment, but we see not only payments to Nathan Wade, but payments to other lawyers out of this same fund in 2022. So I'm very confused about why the district attorney's office would say, oh, it's a clerical error.
We don't pay lawyers out of this fund. We keep the fund low when not only did they pay Nathan Wade, they paid some of the other lawyers out of this same fund. So, Fulton County District Attorney's Office has some explaining to do, and, I'll keep digging.
reSee.it AI Summary
I discovered more payments from Fani Willis to her lover Nathan Wade and other lawyers, sourced from a questionable fund. Georgians deserve transparency. Fani has been serving Fulton County for 24 years and has amassed an estimated net worth of $8 million on a $170,000 salary, raising questions about her wealth. The focus should be on the evolving narrative surrounding her actions, particularly her alleged illegal use of state funds to reimburse Wade for their vacations.
@ToscaAusten - Tosca Austen
An Affair to Remember. 🚨🚨More payments found from Fani Willis to runaway lover Nathan Wade and OTHER lawyers, paid from a ‘seizure (slush) fund’. Georgians deserve answers. ‘Diversity is our strength’ Fani has served the people of Fulton County for 24 years. She has an estimated net worth of $8 million —>on a $170,000 district attorney salary. A fortune. More money than most people make in a lifetime. Never mind how Madam Fani accumulated all that cash —let’s focus on the bigger story. The one that keeps changing. Madam Fani dipped into Georgia state coffers —illegally, to reimburse her married lover turned special prosecutor, Nathan Wade, in CASH for their exotic hideaway vacations.
@GuntherEagleman - Gunther Eagleman™
Fani Willis is refusing to turn over communications between DC and herself. Should she be prosecuted for interfering in an investigation? https://t.co/b9WxDxiIZG
@FreeTrevian - Ms Trevian Kutti
🚨BREAKING: FANI WILLIS BOMBSHELL A WHISTLEBLOWER’S FIRST HAND WITNESS TESTIMONY exposes BILL BARR as the “Architect of The Fulton County RICO with Fani Willis”. There are photos, recordings and documents. Also, ARMSTRONG WILLIAMS uses BEN CARSEN as an involuntary mole. https://t.co/yhXXkgTNri
Video Transcript AI Summary
My wife witnessed various crimes and was involved with a fictitious media company, Howard Stark Holdings. She was indicted for wire fraud after being manipulated into accepting money and making arrangements. I met Armstrong Williams through David Smith and worked closely with Armstrong, who trusted me due to my work ethic. I observed many unproductive employees at Armstrong's office and was tasked with various responsibilities. I noted interactions with Bill Barr and others regarding investigations and potential cases. There were threats made against my wife if she left her position, and I have documented evidence of these threats. I also learned about connections to political figures and the involvement of Ben Carson in gathering information related to Trump. My goal is to reveal the truth about these activities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have my own wife didn't just witness these crimes against you. She witnessed other things and it's entity. It's he has a number of entities. This is a if you it's there is no Howard Stark Holdings. So you can write this down if you want.
Mhmm. Okay. It's a fictitious name. There's no Howard Stark. It's h o w a r d s t I r k Mhmm.
Holdings. That's the name of the media company that hired my wife. Okay. Which is how my wife witnessed all this. It's HSHN.
E l v is Patricia Loveless Bolton. Mhmm. A lot of this stuff is not gonna be relevant. We didn't revise this because this is what we're working
Speaker 1: for. A couple of So it says, text message exchange in September. They're starting to have some exchanges
Speaker 0: because Text relevant to us. Yes. So I told you my wife's been indicted for wire fraud. B a n e l. You'll you'll hear from my wife.
I mean, a lot of this has to do with her case, Bob, and and I know you I know you can't see a trivia. They convinced my wife to accept money and certain arrangements and do certain things. And just
Speaker 2: Let me explain. Okay. Yeah. Let me explain. So, I met Armstrong Williams through Dave Smith, who's the owner of Cinco.
Speaker 3: And I and I and I know Dave Smith, and I know Armstrong Williams. I know them both.
Speaker 2: I met David because back in Brazil, I always worked with politicians. My family come through politician people. And I was working at congress, and one day, I was approached by someone who worked from David because he wanna do, like, some kind of business in Brazil. And I was handle, this, most of this meeting. We end up not working together because back in Brazil anyway.
Does not work this this way, so we didn't work. Okay. So I was in Brazil. I met Mark later, and I went to the US. And I was looking for a job after waiting for the green card for months months.
And I was looking for a job for a long time. And one day, I got in touch with David, and he offered me to meet me in person because we never met him before, to meet me in person and talk. And then when I met him, he always treat me very well. I don't believe he's a part of this. I'm not sure, but I personally don't believe.
So I met him, and I told him that I was looking for a job, and he say, I think you'll be forced that you work for me. But he told me that I thought it worked right for him. But then I figured out, I understand a little bit. He has this Sinclair company, and then he has this small company, which he needs to have, like, a lot a lot of people because Okay. It's a part of my app.
They cannot post and train everyone in the same company. It's kind of a business stuff that I don't spend too much. Got it. So I I went to Armstrong's office, and I started to work from Armstrong based on from David.
Speaker 3: Okay. So
Speaker 2: I was in Armstrong's office every single day working for the guy. Okay. One thing that everyone needs to understand the situation is most of the people who work for Armstrong, they are lazy, stupid people. I'm sorry to
Speaker 3: hear you. No. No. It's true. It's true.
It's 100% true. What happened, they have, like there's a bunch
Speaker 2: of guys that sure Michael, they have there's a bunch of stupid guys who never able to accomplish nothing. Yeah. And David sent me to that to this office because David know that I have hard work, and I I got to get my work done. And he told me, like, go there and figure out things. I need to understand how things never work over there because since I sent money to them and the money was paid over, it's a it's a mess.
Right. I started to work for Armstrong. And I think Armstrong figured out that he can trust me because David trust me to put in to put in me to work there. Okay. So that's one thing that I figured out very fast.
So I think because of this, our response started to put me in all the kind of ice picky dots. So I was hired as a journalist, but in the end, he was putting me to do business. He was putting me to write Visa Business Plan. He put me to intro the people, then he put me to was the woman the phone, and she's like, hi, man. It's Penny, and I'm here to talk with Armstrong.
And I was like, okay. Can you give me more information? She was a little rude. I'm going to put this way because, you know, I understand my accent perfectly. So I transferred the call.
That was my first contact with her. Okay. So after what what I understand, it is they are working together for a long time. That's what I think. Okay.
So she called there, and we have, like, a lot of calls with her. Beau Bar I know that sounds insane, but Beau Bar is always in the office too. He's very close to Armstrong, and he's always there. And they always like in touch. So Nathan called the office to Nathan Gardner also called the office to a bunch of times.
I don't remember exactly his name, but I have all this. I have all the notes and information. But just before I was in touch. Okay. So we exchange emails, text message, phone calls.
Always, Bill Barr was involved in this kind of things. Okay. I saw a few ladies one time in the office. Okay. A small person, bad woman, a little head.
Right. I saw her in person. I saw her, I think it was February February 27. I think it was February
Speaker 0: 3rd according to your notes. I'll share them out. So it says that the chair of
Speaker 1: the play set of 2023. 23. 23.
Speaker 2: Okay. Yeah. And she was she was in DC, not too mad. It's Yeah. From a 10 minute walk to the studio.
Speaker 0: We'll get to the entrance.
Speaker 1: So it's close to the close to the end of
Speaker 2: day too. So Yeah. Yeah. Okay. So he's always there.
And, like, I will be honest with you. He always trips me well. He goes very nice with me all the time. And hang on. And we have photographs are not great, but, Bob, we have photographs of her.
Yeah. She's generally Okay. We need to improve the data and show. I'm a journalist. I just picture with everything.
Good. So, Pughar is always there, and I remember, I'm not sure. Again, I'm not sure, but I remember she was around to do something. Okay. And she because she walked to the office.
Okay. That's why I'm a 100% sure. She walked so she was around I'm not sure if she was, like, in in the congress, in the White House, or someone else around, but she walked back to the office. Okay. So she was in the office.
I had another person with her. I don't know what the person Right. I think it was her assistant or something like this, but she was with someone else. And Bill Barr came few minutes later, and I was the meeting that I was sitting on the meeting seeing everyone. Okay.
And I had most jokin' notes. And the meeting that where I wrote, 3 3 bins, I think. 3 3 bins. Yeah. 3 bins.
Yeah. Yeah. That's how I learned about you. Like, specifically with the right name. Okay.
Because before, they are focused. I know how they got you and Right. And how they got it back. And and what I understand and, again, I can't be wrong about that. Somehow, Sandy Williams was watching the communication of people.
Mhmm. And that's how she got to him and she got to you.
Speaker 0: Okay. Hey, stop. Stop. Babe, do you understand what she's saying? They have a wire tab or a warning versus Nina.
That's what she's talking about. Like, she says watching the communication, they believe somebody was observing their their electronic communication for telephonic. Mhmm.
Speaker 1: But but that was in 21 or 23 or 20 23.
Speaker 0: It's in early February 20 what is the date? February 23rd. So outside of for now. That's 192023 for the year. Right?
The meeting is the 27th. The the notes I just flashed here is from this meeting.
Speaker 1: This 27th. It originally sells. Yeah. So they they talked to about
Speaker 3: Which is my birthday.
Speaker 0: So that's when a lawyer generated this for us. My wife didn't know it was this information. Explain to them when the meeting was about
Speaker 2: my as I understand, they already have the list of people they are, like, investigating or target. But I don't know exactly how they got into the list because I was not a part of all the meetings because Shermichael and another people from the office was more into that than me. Okay. So in that meeting, that was when I heard about you, I heard about this, another guy, And that was the meeting that I can guarantee while I listen, while I take notes, it is they're bringing the, the case. I I think it was called Rycote.
Rycote. Rycote. Rycote. And all the time, He was always, like, let's bring all this case. Let's charge these people because he thought that would be the easiest way.
I still have to be advised Bill Barr is involved. I don't have any Hey. Hey. Is everybody understand what she's saying? That Bill Barr is the architect of
Speaker 0: the Oh, the Right. I Okay. It does make sense. Like, Fawny Willis wasn't was was opposed to Rico. Right?
Speaker 2: Interesting. Yeah. Like, she wants to actually bring the case. She she I don't know why, but she we wanna bring something. Mhmm.
And I I know what I heard. And the OR say, lastly, bring a recall case. And why I never forgot was because he told the recall case can be anything. Right. Right.
Which
Speaker 0: and I just asked her Right. And I
Speaker 1: Well It makes sense to Turkey because Turkey is because I usually know. I watched all of this. So he did
Speaker 0: a lot of analysis for more on funding. Right?
Speaker 2: And continue. So In in that point, I I'm not sure what's going on. All the time, I'm a ask,
Speaker 4: I'm a ask, I'm a ask, I'm a ask, I'm a ask. I'm a start. I'm a start. I'm a start.
Speaker 2: I'm a start. I'm a start. I'm a start. I'm a start. I'm a start.
I'm a start. I'm a start. I'm a start. I'm a start. I'm a start.
I'm a start. I'm a start. Any of a lot of people, illegal stuff, not just like this case. We have another politician that always in the office. But okay.
So how this is handled in this situation? One, I I tried to resign many times and I have all the letters that I sent for Armstrong about that. In my letters, I put, like, San Diego's name, few of our names. I I would send them many times. And all the time, they denied, that I can leave the office because I always sign NDTA.
NDAA? Mhmm. Yeah. Let me
Speaker 0: play this to Bob real quick about messaging all these documents. So you could trust her, trust me, and
Speaker 5: then you can hear
Speaker 0: from her. It's very weird. Every matter they work on, which is I work in house now, they they make her sign an NDA. So they corrupt Bob and then this matter. Sign an NDA.
It's it's not it's not titled that. Right. They even did regular things like getting leases for high net worth individuals that they shouldn't get, which is, like, my wife are caught up
Speaker 1: at. Sorry. Oh,
Speaker 0: no. That's Bob. Okay. It's it's actually it was just some businessman that shouldn't that isn't eligible for a Visa where, Mark Strong knows people in the government and they and and and I would just know if she was supposed to build the business back in these investment pieces, but she did it. And it's status.
He would threaten to have preparedness here. We brought American threat to have it recorded.
Speaker 2: We have these threats. How many threats do you think he I don't know. It's Donald Trump's. I have everything. Yes.
Good seeing you. We have this day to day. And all the time, he's like, if you leave my office, I'm going to sue you. I'm going to do a deportation. And and, by the way, one day, I had a brilliant idea because every single person in government.
And these people, like, they didn't work with me before. They know me. They trust me. I told them what happened. I called all the people that I know.
They started to, like, let's take you political asylum. So I gave a year to a medical with a political asylum. I have all the paperwork. So after this, because But it's not in the basis of the political asylum. It's the information about your work with Armstrong.
Speaker 1: If I dream that you are contacting the republican people, I'm not kidding about going after you and your family as hard as I can. I will live your life evermore, even more. Do you understand me?
Speaker 3: That came today?
Speaker 2: Wow. Wait. But that that threat came today? Yes, sir. Yesterday.
Yesterday. Wow. When I was here in Mexico in April 15, spot on. Like, I I tapped my worst spot on. They came here, and they start to fight between each other.
So, like, you need to leave. Like, leave their things. And all the time, I'm I'm not being raised, but all the time, the guy that was there, the FBI agent wasn't on with the prosecutor code work. Mhmm. And all the time, they're like, look.
She has pulling a cos Tyler. The bank of government spoke with, Russell Coburg. Mhmm. And they're like, look, stress pulling it across, Tyler. You cannot do nothing.
You cannot take nothing from her. And he was yelling in the phone. Like, no. You don't need to take her or take the thing she has. And and that was the last time that the government, like, came direct to me.
Okay. And I have documents. I have videos of this thing I have everything. Okay. And just today, like, I have secured people around me all the time.
So when I start to understand more about the value in this case, because again, in that point, obviously Stop. Stop. Stop.
Speaker 6: Stop. Stop. Stop. Stop. Stop.
Stop. Stop. Stop. Stop. Stop.
Stop. Stop. Stop. Stop. Stop.
Stop. Stop. Stop. Stop. Stop.
Stop. Stop. Stop. Stop.
Speaker 0: Stop. Stop. Stop. Stop. Stop.
Stop. Stop. Stop. Stop. Stop.
Stop. Stop. Stop. Stop. Stop.
Stop. Stop. Stop. Stop. Stop.
Stop. Stop. Stop. Stop.
Speaker 2: I know people there. And when they bring Jimmy to work in Venezuela, okay, that was like, hold on. So that's when I started to realize things was not wrong. It was just the Venezuela case. I discovered it was wrong was because they're doing the the business with Venezuela, I called personally, my daughter we got to this meeting with Facebook and I have to plan to just, like, just plan confirmation Mhmm.
About the January 6, about Georgia case. And that's how the situation ends up like this. And my goal is every day since that time, I'm trying to tell people what happened. But one thing that I give you out is I don't know. I I'm not sure if a dog work may be involved.
Who knows? Okay. Is the prosecutor. But one thing that I can tell is we're, like, a 100%
Speaker 3: I don't. I don't. You do? I do not.
Speaker 0: That he said that, anyway, the accountant said the fucking guy that it's bagels has said that, in fact, not that
Speaker 6: it's relevant to Toby's case. The man who is witness
Speaker 0: who would be a huge, you know, the the
Speaker 1: So who is this spelled? His name is
Speaker 0: it's not really it's Julian, j u l I a, the I don't have it. Race, r e I s.
Speaker 3: She's like a Reeves. Rees. Julian Reeves. Yeah. Julian Reeves.
Yeah. I've definitely heard of Julian Rees.
Speaker 0: I definitely know him. Number 2. Any businessman who is also a Republican, you may know Terry Giles, g I l e n. Gary
Speaker 2: saying it to me over Twitter. You have it. I don't think I have it. I deleted it, but I want the name of it. I want it in my what they believe.
It's not about, like, political view. For them, principle, like, for Armstrong, it is about the money and the power. So he's able to play with Macron. Like, he's very close to the mayor of DC, which is very democratic first. A little bit of the revenge.
Mhmm. But they work together all the time.
Speaker 0: So we have merits that they don't have my share of
Speaker 3: So is anybody willing to testify? But I think my question
Speaker 2: I think I think that was because Betty Wade is in line. I hate that. Okay. Because I left the office with the phones that we use it. Okay.
And that's why I have her personal phone number that I exchanged WhatsApp message with her. Mhmm. And one day I was like, maybe they don't care about Venezuela that much, but that will be like the most important thing for me because it's about people, like, close Correct. And I I didn't check the the document because it was, like, in a I don't know how to say English. It was, like, in an envelope.
But I remember there was, like, a confidential there was, like, a mark
Speaker 0: there was, like, a
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 3: The other lawyer. Yeah. Yeah. The other lawyer. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Mhmm. Okay. Do you know what I'm saying? Army Strong is called you, Ben Carson.
Mhmm. But Ben Carson is not a part of this. Okay. Owen Strong calls Ben Carson. Owen Strong is a lie.
A person with you, a person with me, a person with Ben Carson. She got information all the time from Ben Carson Mhmm. To PES or to, to Barb or to another people because as I understood, and I can be wrong, Ben Carson is a person very close to Trump. Like, friend. Mhmm.
Right? So I tried to talk with him and say, be careful about lawyers like Sheryl Armstrong. Mhmm. Because many times, many times, I saw our Michael, he was working for the Trump administration, and he got fired by Trump. Mhmm.
And they had a funny about that because Armstrong was based in he used Ben Carson
Speaker 0: would those documents have been? She may have known. So may you turn to the page in your journal in the week of May 20 February 2023, Rico?
Speaker 3: That's my birthday.
Speaker 2: Wait. Because, that was because the charge was not written yet at the point, and he was, like, wanna ask them about some So as I understood the last point was, like, Bufar needs some information about Trump related to the, like, the the facts about, like, the it's still being elected. Let's say this week. Right. So I understood and I understood Bill Barr cannot call Trump and ask him questions to write about the facts.
Right. But they use Ben Carson. So withdrawal called Ben Carson, and, like, they talked, talked, talked, they got information. And after this because I remember the day. I have notes of the day.
After this, like, one day later, I think, what, 1 or 2 days later, David Carson got the information, but he didn't know, like,
Speaker 0: why they are using that information. No. No. I understand that the person didn't know me and me giving information to her
Speaker 2: Who was the person at Facebook? That's important. Kelly Care State. Who?
Speaker 6: We have
Speaker 0: the name. We're gonna see it now.
Speaker 2: Dougie Alley? Uh-huh. Uh-huh. Gary. Gary.
Gary. Gary, g e r s e I. Gary. Okay.
Speaker 0: Can you text it to me the name, just I don't think I got it. Got it. Okay. Now I guess Alright.
Speaker 1: Maybe anything more at this point or
Speaker 3: I think we're just gonna, you know, parse this out. I definitely wanted to you know, you would have to be comfortable, as being named as the, whether you wanna call it a, you know, the the source or, you know, the whistleblower, you know, whichever you prefer, but you're gonna have to be comfortable in that space.
Speaker 0: Do you understand that you I have to My my wife does. So you probably I
Speaker 2: worked at PolyJet since I was 16.
reSee.it AI Summary
I review documents showing four minutes and forty-six seconds of seditious conspiracy. I report that Fulton County DA Fani “Bang Bang” Willis confesses to 212 pages of conspiracy, linking the Jan 6 Committee and Special Counsel Jacklyn Smith to take down the U.S. government before the 2024 election. An extra 170 pages cover her affair with Nathan Wade, who earned more as her “special prosecutor.” Smith is referred to DOJ OPR and state bar panels.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here it is: Documents obtained by @JudicialWatch through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) confirms four minutes and forty-six seconds of seditious conspiracy: 🚨🚨 COURTHOUSE BOMBSHELLS: The disgraced, duplicated Fulton County District Attorney Fani "Bang Bang" Willis confesses to 212 pages of conspiracy. She went from having zero records to 212 pages of records detailing a seditious conspiracy involving Fani Willis, the Jan 6 Committee, and Special Counsel Jacklyn Smith to take down the U.S. government ahead of the 2024 presidential election. Additionally, another 170 pages of records detailing her fuck-affair with her whopping $500,000 special prostitute, Nathan Wade. "Wade made much more money than the other special prosecutors only because Wade was fucking me." 📝Special Counsel Jacklyn Smith has been referred for criminal investigation to the Department of Justice's (DOJ) Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) and to state bar panels in New York and Tennessee.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Weeks of controversy over allegations of an improper romantic relationship between Fulton County District Attorney Fonny Willis and a special prosecutor in the 2020 election interference case culminated in a lengthy court filing from Willis. The filing, more than 170 pages, includes Willis’s admission of a “personal relationship” with special prosecutor Nathan Wade, but she asserts that relationship should not impact their roles in the case.
In January, a defendant in the ongoing 2020 election case moved to disqualify Willis, arguing that she appointed Wade as a special prosecutor and that she financially benefited from the relationship. Willis’s latest motion disputes that portrayal. Eleven Alive previously reported that Wade paid for airline tickets for the pair to travel to San Francisco and Miami; Willis, however, writes that financial responsibility for personal travel is divided roughly evenly between the two, with all expenses paid using individual personal funds. The outlet had also reported that Wade was paid more than $500,000 more than the two other special prosecutors on the case; Willis contends Wade earned more money because he “made much more work.”
Legal experts Daryl Cohen and Clark Cunningham offered differing views on how the filing might affect the case going into the February 15 hearing. Cohen suggested the judge could determine that the matter does not require disqualification but that the parties are under intense scrutiny. Cunningham anticipated the disqualification issue would not be resolved at the hearing and described the matter as very complicated.
The February 15 hearing will be the first time these allegations are publicly addressed in open court.
In a related matter, the US House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan released a letter indicating he subpoenaed documents from Willis. The subpoena seeks documents related to the DA’s use of federal funds after a conservative outlet published accusations that Willis fired an employee who attempted to halt the misuse of federal funds intended for youth gang prevention programs. The documents are also linked to the January 6 investigation.
Atlanta News First political reporter Doug Reardon reported from outside the Fulton County Courthouse that the open records requests were issued through Georgia’s open records law. The judge, Robert McBurney, previously admonished Willis for not complying within required time frames, with the court asserting that Willis must turn over documents requested by the conservative nonprofit Judicial Watch. The judge stated that Willis had five days to produce the documents and that, according to him, the court had effectively declared a violation of the Open Records Act. Some communications, he noted, are of public interest and not protected by privilege.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Weeks of controversy surrounding allegations that she had an improper romantic relationship with a special prosecutor leading the twenty twenty election case. Fulton County District Attorney Fonny Willis finally responded with a court filing of her own
Speaker 1: 11 alive investigative reporter Zach Merchant has the document. Zach, what are we learning? What does it say here?
Speaker 2: We do. We have it right here. We got it just a few hours ago. It's more than 170 pages long. The big takeaway DA Fonny Willis admits to having what she called a personal relationship with special prosecutor Nathan Wade, but said that should not impact their roles in the case.
In a court filing in January, a defendant in the ongoing twenty twenty election case asked the court to disqualify the DA, accusing her of appointing Wade as a special prosecutor and then financially benefiting from that relationship. But in today's motion, Willis said that is not true. Previous eleven alive reporting revealed that Wade paid for airline tickets for the pair to fly to San Francisco and Miami. But today, Willis wrote that is not the entire case. She said financial responsibility for personal travel is divided roughly evenly between the two and all expenses paid for with individual personal funds.
Eleven Alive had also shown an earlier reporting that Wade was paid more than $500,000 more than the two other special prosecutors on the case. But in today's filing, Willis wrote that Wade made much more money than the other special prosecutors only because Wade did much more work. Two Atlanta legal experts, Daryl Cohen and Clark Cunningham took different views on how they predict today's filing will impact the case ahead of a scheduled hearing next month.
Speaker 3: I think that the judge will look at it, and he may, obviously, he may do anything. But if I were to guess, he would say this is not going to rise to you having to disqualify yourself or Nathan Wade, but you guys need to be aware that you're under the hardest microscope ever.
Speaker 4: I do not think this disqualification matter is gonna be resolved, at the hearing on February 15 or anytime soon thereafter. I think this is gonna be a very, very complicated matter.
Speaker 2: That upcoming hearing on February 15 will be the first time these allegations are directly addressed in open court. We, of course, will be there when it happens.
Speaker 0: Alright, so a big development today, Zach, but that wasn't the only development concerning the DA.
Speaker 2: No, it wasn't in a related matter, but not entirely on this exact topic. The US House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan released a letter indicating he subpoenaed documents and information from DA Willis. According to his letter, we got a copy of earlier today. Jordan is seeking documents relating to the DA's office's use of federal funds after a conservative news outlet published allegations that Willis fired an employee who tried to stop the misuse of federal funds meant for youth gang prevention programs.
Speaker 1: Turn over documents related to her election interference case. She was sued by a conservative nonprofit claiming Willis was ignoring their requests, and the judge agreed. Atlanta news first political reporter Doug Reardon is live outside of the Fulton County Courthouse. And, Doug, these documents are also linked to the January 6 investigation.
Speaker 5: Yeah. Presumably, they are and they were made through the open records request that we have here in Georgia and across the country. Anyone can use it. We use it all the time as journalists. It lets you get your hand, hands on public records and tied to that law, there are some really specific time frames in which officials have to respond and either grant or deny those requests.
The judge said yesterday that Willis just plain ignored those time frames. Fulton County district attorney, Fonny Willis, must turn over documents requested by conservative nonprofit judicial watch. The group wanted Willis's communications with the federal January sixth committee and Trump's DC prosecutor, Jack Smith, as she carried out her own case with Trump at the center.
Speaker 6: It is clear that they did not want to comply or were unable or unwilling to comply, and complying with this law is mandatory. Attorney Josh Schiffer says the Open Records Act
Speaker 5: is meant for transparency and set strict standards for responses.
Speaker 6: The argument from these conservative groups and other groups trying to get information is that Fonny Willis can very easily collect this information, it's all digital, and send it over.
Speaker 5: Judge Robert McBurney agreed, telling Willis she had five days to produce the documents, adding, quote, the court has, in effect, declared that she has violated the Open Records Act.
Speaker 6: Some of those communications are absolutely of public interest. They're not protected by any privilege.