reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - March 24, 2023 at 5:49 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
US law enforcement agencies are working to bring indictments against Ralph Baric, Anthony Fauci, and Peter Daszak for collaborating to create a bioweapon that caused a global pandemic. They covered up their Gain of Function research and spliced a common cold coronavirus with an HIV gene to make it highly virulent. The Covid vaccines were ready before the discovery of Covid, and the spike proteins they produce have caused deaths worldwide. The mRNA vaccines use CRISPR technology to change DNA and produce a toxic spike protein that cannot be shut off. The lipid nanoparticle packaging is a classified toxin meant to harm humanity. The WHO Charter has been disqualified, and the World Homicide Organization was trying to create another pandemic with the Marburg virus. US District Attorneys and Sheriffs are charging Fauci, Baric, Daszak, and others for premeditated mass murder.

@SpartaJustice - Truth Justice ™

BREAKING NEWS: Three U.S. Law Enforcement Agencies working to bring indictments against Ralph Baric, Anthony Fauci and Peter Daszak who collaborated to bring this global pandemic, genocide and bioweapon against all of humanity. Over 14 million dead from the bioweapon vaccines. This was all done during a time when they were not allowed to do Gain of Function research because there was a moratorium against it. They covered it up and lied and weaponized a common cold coronavirus that's been around for thousands of years. They spliced it with an HIV gene making it very highly virulent, highly toxic and highly damaging. U.S. Patents show they had the Covid vaccines already made and ready to go before they discovered Covid. They weaponized the spike protein and injected this into billions of people. The spike proteins produced by the Covid vaccines have murdered people. People are dropping dead all over the world from heart attacks, strokes, myocarditis and blood clots. They used mRNA CRISPR technology to change the DNA making the body manufacture an out of control toxic spike protein that can't shut off. It's only a matter of time before the vaccinated succumb to damages to the body. European research labs show the lipid nanoparticle packaging of the mRNA vaccines are classified toxins. It was from the very beginning meant to kill and hurt humanity. People in the U.S. and Justin Trudeau are indicted for premeditated mass murder and global terrorism. This is a violation of the Nuremberg code to create a bioweapon and use something that is experimental and force people to take it. They are using these vaccine bioweapons to genocide Americans and people worldwide. It's unfathomable what's happened. Additional Breaking News from a competent source with authority reveals that the WHO Charter has been legally disqualified for some time now. The World Homicide Organization was trying to create another pandemic with the Marburg virus but this will not happen again. We will now stop this madness, this genocide.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, Pascal and Van der Stiel discuss explosive information regarding criminal charges and indictments against Fauci. They claim that Fauci, along with Ralph Barrick and Pete Tirdaszek, collaborated to create a bioweapon and weaponized the spike proteins of the coronavirus. They also mention the harmful effects of the mRNA vaccines and the violation of the Nuremberg Code. Pascal and Van der Stiel express hope that justice will prevail and that the World Health Organization (WHO) charter will be legally qualified. They emphasize the need to stop the genocide and pray for justice to be served.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a very important video that you, Pascal, did some days ago with an American in Florida. Speaker 1: Yeah. It was it was 3 o'clock in the morning here and 9 o'clock in Florida in the evening. And I couldn't sleep, and I was watching, my messages and became a message from doctor Martin from the States. Speaker 0: David Dean Martin? Speaker 1: Yes. And he informed me that he had launched the criminal charges indictments against Fauci. And I said I called down Van Der Stiehl. I said, let's do a Let's break the news to the people. And she was driving the car, doing the talk with me, me at 3 o'clock here in the suit. The I think we should share it to the to your audience, to get this very important piece of news, Out of America. Speaker 0: So just for about 8 minutes, you will see that interview and we will be quiet And afterwards, we will come back to you as you can see us in the interview. Speaker 1: Yes. Good evening. Good night here from Switzerland or good morning, I should say. Good evening to, Florida, USA, United States of America, great to have you with us, Van der Stiel. How are you doing? Speaker 2: Pascal, never better. I've been all over South Florida today meeting with people, learning a lot of information, sharing a lot of information, but tonight, it seems as if, there's some explosive information that needs to be shared, and it needs to be shared immediately. Good news, in fact. Speaker 1: Good. Go ahead. Speaker 2: So it it looks like our friend David Martin, who has been very busy with now has been working with 3 law enforcement agencies that shall not be named at this time In order to bring indictments against Ralph Barrick from the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill, one Anthony Fauci, And Pete Tirdaszek with EcoHealth Alliance, 2 of the 3 musketeers that collaborated to bring this global pandemic and genocide and bioweapon against all of humanity, these names have been in our news, not the fake news, but our news for several years now. We've been talking about, the, the actual, the evil that they perpetrated on humanity, the the the the the bioweapons, The weaponization using gain of function research during a time when there was a moratorium on gain of function research. Fauci lied in congress. He lied to Senator Rand Paul when senator Rand Paul asked him if he was funding data function, Fauci lied. And the reason he goes live was because he was running the money Through the non governmental organization called Ego Health Alliance and Peter Daszak, who was funding Ralph Barrick, and, of course, the Wuhan Virology Institute, where the beta function research results are being conducted. So this was all done during a time when they were not allowed to do it. They covered it up and lied and weaponized a coronavirus, which is a common garden variety cold that has been around for 1000 of years, But they weaponized it, and they spliced in, you know, DNA that includes the HIV gene and other other genetic material That has made this highly virulent, highly toxic, and highly damaging. And it's you know, at this point, with the, Vaccines already ready to go. The patents have been proven that the vaccines were already there before they discovered COVID, that they've made those into bioweapons they've injected The billions of arms and by the estimations we're getting now, has now over 14,000,000 people worldwide are dead. Speaker 1: This is incredibly Horrible to listen to. It's abhorrent. So they weaponized the spike proteins in Wuhan between the moratorium in the moratorium Speaker 2: That's right. Speaker 1: Which was on the USA of America, United States of America, and Canada. Right? Speaker 2: Exactly. But, I mean, let's put this in the context where people can understand it. That spike protein has done so much atherosclerotic damage, you know, cardiac damage. It is it is murdered people, heart attacks in the middle of soccer matches. In fact, Belgium just lost one of their goalies the other day in the middle of a soccer match. We've seen athletes in their prime when they should be at their healthiest, dropping dead on fields all over the globe, and this is all because Of the, you know, cardiac arrest, myocarditis, and and just the the cardiovascular damage that people are sustaining From a protein that has spikes on it, bouncing around inside your cell walls of your arteries and doing damage. And so this is what they've Dejected to the people. They've now used the mRNA CRISPR technology to change your DNA, making your body a manufacturer of these spike proteins out of control. Speaker 1: That's right. Shut off. It can't shut off. That's right. Speaker 2: So it's only a matter of time once you've had the shot before you you choose to come to this damage. It's Just unbelievable and unfathomable what they've done. Speaker 1: And it is also now evident, evident in European universities research labs that the packaging of the mRNA, the lipid, the nano lipids Are classified toxic. Speaker 2: That's right. Speaker 1: Mixed toxin into a so called, I Called injection. I refused to call the vaccine. No. It was from the beginning meant to kill and hurt people, humanity. Speaker 2: That's right. Speaker 1: So that's why people in the US and Trudeau are indicted for premeditated Mass murder and, global terrorism because there was a moratorium to weaponize, the spike proteins, a gain of function. Speaker 2: This is against Nuremberg Code? Correct. 1000% against the Nuremberg Code, to create a bioweapon and use something that's experimental and force people to take it. That is also another violation of Narvar. You cannot use an experimental Therapy on anybody and and not be considered violating the Nuremberg code. So in fact, on a side note, this horrific accident in So maybe we've had another 2 more train accidents in Houston and in Michigan in the last several days, but that's turning the eastern United States into a Superfund site With dioxin poisoning, which is what they used in World War one, it's mustard gas. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 2: You know, again, this is these public private partnerships, Pascal, we're seeing big government in the corporation, big government, big pharmaceuticals weaponizing, working together, the government having the liability shield, Protection of a corporation that makes you untouchable. And, they're using it to genocide Americans and People worldwide. It's unfathomable what's happened. Speaker 1: You and I, I mean, the Swiss morning at 3 o'clock here and you driving in Florida at 9 p. M, I think, or something. Speaker 2: Right. Almost Speaker 1: We have a great you have a great evening. I have a great morning here to not Celebrate. It's not celebration. But, we we are confident now and we are certain That the wrath of justice starts to have a grip worldwide. Speaker 2: I believe so. Yeah. Speaker 1: Especially here in Switzerland, we're progressing, I hope. And in the US and Canada, they are now chasing in the US and Canada, Those people and the prime minister of Canada for mass murder and global terrorism. Speaker 2: It's about time to go. It's way overdue. It's way overdue. Speaker 1: We have also something to share with you. So you have a good evening as well. I heard that I'm allowed to share this with you here, Breaking the news in North America and Canada and Switzerland in a few hours when people get up That actually I heard and I know from somebody competent with authority that the WHO charter is actually legally Qualified since quite some time. Speaker 2: And this is great news because the United States, along with many other countries, I've been scrambling in the past so many months to draft amendments to the International Health Regulations, which would have, subjugated and basically Given about their sovereignty to the United Nations World Health Organization. But as countries were waking up to the genocide being perpetrated by the World Homicide organization. They decided they didn't wanna participate, so the World Homicide Organization shifted from using amendments to the IHR Into now driving people into this international pandemic treaty, which is why we've seen them talk about Marburg virus, a hemorrhagic fever Like Ebola, for which there's only ever been a 160 cases ever reported worldwide. It's extremely rare. But they were gonna turn this into the next Scary pandemic and push it on the on on global humanity to get everybody scared, locked down, and, of course, they had another vaccine, supposedly a vaccine, a shot, an mRNA shot. No more. They can't do it. Speaker 1: Happen again And with my dead body and the honor of humanity, we will now stop this madness, this genocide. And I pray to God that we can carry through with justice to do the right thing.

@SpartaJustice - Truth Justice ™

FAUCI'S BIOWEAPONS: Covid-19 and the Covid vaccines are a deliberate bioweapon attack on the United States and around the world. Anthony Fauci deliberately lied to the U.S. Congress. The Covid vaccine Bioweapons produce the Gain of Function Wuhan spike … Show more https://t.co/rEW9dMZ8kq

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Fleming testifies that COVID-19 and the vaccines are a deliberate bioweapon attack on the US. She argues that genetic changes were made to the spike protein in a lab to create COVID-19. She questions the truthfulness of Dr. Fauci's statement that gain of function research was not funded. Dr. Fleming claims that the vaccines have not reduced COVID cases or deaths and considers them bioweapons due to the spike protein. Other speakers express concerns about the toxicity and ineffectiveness of the vaccines, as well as the misinformation from various organizations. They urge people to stop taking vaccines and experimental therapies. The speakers also criticize the experimentation on children and call for legal accountability for the companies involved.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Doctor Fleming, we've asked you to come testify about whether COVID nineteen and related vaccines are a deliberate bioweapon attack on the United States. Madam, court reporter, can you please identify yourself for the record? Speaker 1: My name is Karen Usher, Texas CSR number 5536. Speaker 0: Thank you. Can you please swear in the witness? Speaker 1: Doctor Fleming, will you raise your right hand? Do you swear the testimony you give today will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you god? Speaker 0: I do. Doctor Fleming, do you consent to this testimony being used in any appropriate proceeding? Are you prepared to testify under oath hear today that COVID nineteen is a bioweapon. Speaker 2: Yes, I am. Speaker 0: So to be clear, genetic changes were made to the spike protein In a lab to create what is known as the COVID-nineteen, correct? Speaker 2: That's what all the data shows. Speaker 0: Doctor Fauci testified under oath to congress, under questioning by senator Rand Paul, that the NIH and NIAID had not funded gain of function research. Was that statement truthful? Speaker 3: Doctor Fauci, knowing that it is a crime to lie to Congress, Do you wish to retract your statement of May 11th, where you claimed that the NIH never funded gain of function research in Wuhan? Senator Paul, I have never lied before the Congress, and I do not retract that statement. This is your definition that you guys wrote. It says that scientific research that increases the transmissibility among animals is gain of function. They took animal viruses that only occur in animals, and they increased their transmissibility to humans. How you can say that is not gain of function. It is not. It's a dance, and you're dancing around this because you're trying to obscure responsibility for 4,000,000 People dying around the world from a pandemic. Speaker 2: Well, as we've shown and as we've talked about, that that was that was a lie. And if you go to the EUA documents for Pfizer, Moderna, Janssen, the 3 that are EUA approved in the US, and you asked that fundamental question, how many people do not get sick For, Pfizer, that using their data, there's no statistically significant reduction in COVID cases For vaccinated people versus unvaccinated. If you look at Moderna, the same thing, no statistical reduction in COVID cases for the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated. Data is very clear, the science is very clear, the vaccines have not done anything to do reduce COVID cases or deaths. Just a fundamental question. If you understand that This spike protein is a gain of function by a weapon. Why would you then replicate that same genetic sequence and put it in a vaccine. Speaker 0: Based on all of this, would somebody be totally off base If they believe these vaccines were in and of themselves a bioweapon. Speaker 2: Well, the fact that the spike protein is a gain of function developed virus which by definition is a bioweapon, replicating that same genetic sequence and and putting it into a vaccine it doesn't matter How you get it into the human body is still a is still a bioweapon. Speaker 4: I really do believe that the Federal government is captured. And it's captured by corporate interests. Entire US population as well as the world has to understand they can no longer take these COVID vaccines. These are they are toxic and lethal to an end and ineffective That they have completely failed. They can only be viewed as harmful, and they need to be stopped. Speaker 5: And does it damage the brain? You bet it does. Does it damage the heart? Yes. The liver? Yes. The bone marrow? Yes. It causes all sorts of harm in the human body. We should have stopped this before it started. Speaker 6: It's a misinformation from the CDC, the FDA, the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the American College of OBGYN, the Society of Maternal Field Medicine. It's a misinformation from those organizations that is causing a lot of death and injury in my women of reproductive age, my pregnant women, and my pre born babies. And it's gotta And it's gotta stop now. Speaker 3: And for the vaccines broadly, we have no idea what's gonna happen Long term now that they're in the body, studies suggest that the vaccines and the spike protein that's produced from them never leaves the human body. Speaker 6: The the first and most important thing, don't take any more vaccines. Don't take any more boosters. Do not take any more of these dangerous experimental therapies. Speaker 2: Most alarmingly for the children right now, when you have people at an FDA meeting making a statement that we need to vaccinate the children, But we won't know what happens to them until we vaccinate them. Speaker 7: But we're never going to learn about how Facebook vaccine is unless we start giving it. Yeah. That's just the way it goes. That's how we found out about rare complications of other vaccines like the Rotomartis vaccine. And I I do think that we are going to I I do think we should vote to approve it. Speaker 2: That's the experimental phase of a research project. And as of 1947, I thought that we had officially, although it's very clear from The Tuskegee Airmen and other studies that have been done, paid for by the US government, that It it seems that our leaders don't have a problem experimenting on our elderly, on our police officers, on our first responders, on our doctors and nurses, on our general public, and now apparently don't have a problem experimenting on our children. The all the evidence shows there's no statistical benefit to using these vaccines. The mass vaccination has caused pressure selection of these variants. It has produced significant adverse effects in the people it's been given to. The FDA has admitted during its EUA documents for children that we won't know what it does to our children until we experiment on our children. It's very clear. These vaccines have done nothing to solve the problem. They need to be stopped. The companies need to be held legally accountable. We need to hold the people accountable that have been responsible for doing this. They have violated the Biological Weapons Convention Treaty. They have violated the Nuremberg Code. They have violated the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

@SpartaJustice - Truth Justice ™

PREMEDITATED MASS MURDER: U.S. District Attorney's and U.S. Sheriffs working together to criminally charge Anthony Fauci, Ralph Baric, Peter Daszak and others for racketeering, collusion, premeditated mass murder by Covid-19, Remdesivir and the vaccines. … Show more https://t.co/1iikpMH7Lp

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the National Vaccine Injury Act and the PrEP Act, stating that felonies were committed in the process of emergency use authorization for vaccines. They argue that corporate liability shields protect pharmaceutical companies and healthcare organizations, but only if no felonies were committed. They claim that felonies have been committed, including racketeering and premeditated and negligent homicide. The speaker also criticizes the vaccination of children in New York City for $100, calling it dangerous. Another speaker testifies that the vaccine is killing people and cites reports of deaths following vaccination. They argue that the risks outweigh the benefits, especially for children. The video includes discussions on vaccine mandates, the safety of vaccines, and allegations of crimes committed by individuals such as Anthony Fauci and Ralph Barrick.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There is a single silver bullet inside of the 1986 National Vaccine Injury Act and under the 2005 PrEP Act, Which is that there was a felony committed in the process of promulgating an emergency use authorization. Then the corporate liability shields that protect Companies like Pfizer and Moderna, and and Gilead Sciences, and that protect the hospitals and the consolidated healthcare organization. Those those civil protections against liability exist only if there were no felonies committed in the creation of the Emergency Use Authorization. We know that from racketeering, from lying to congress, and from now, premeditated and negligent and reckless homicide. We know that there are a number of felonies that have been committed. What we're now doing is actively Pursuing the enforcement of law enforcement around the country to bring those felony cases forward. So that we have a pierce of the liability shield that currently is the reason why the pharmaceutical companies and the healthcare companies and everybody else thinks that they can operate with impunity. Real human beings right now are being murdered by people in lab coats today, right here in Salt Lake. Speaker 1: I'm gonna be very clear about this and I've recently just testified in the US Senate, December 7, 2022, The vaccine is killing people and is killing large numbers of people. It fulfills all the criteria for the Bradford Hill tenets of causality For, a medicinal product causing death, our CDC, as of December 23, 2022, has over six 1000 Americans that have died within a few days of taking the vaccine. And that's probably a gross under report. Speaker 0: Right now, we know that in New York, the governor or sorry. The mayor of New York City has said that he's gonna give children. Are you ready for this $100 candy money if they agreed to the injection. Think about that. We were always told when we were kids, don't take money from strangers. Don't take candy from strangers. Well, guess what? The mayor of New York is saying, take money and candy from strangers and change your genetics, Change your health, change your life in perpetuity for $100. Speaker 2: New York City is extending the $100 incentive to kids who get vaccinated at city run sites or at their schools. Children Ages 5 to 11 are now eligible to get the Pfizer shot. News 4 talked to 1 mother and daughter who say they're doing their part to beat the pandemic. Well, I'm a little nervous, But I'm also excited. I don't wanna get COVID. We're down to variant. We were really excited about going forward, to make a small contribution to the health of New York City. Starting on Monday, kids can also get vaccinated at pop up sites at their city schools. Speaker 1: So as we sit here today, if the topic of discussion is childhood vaccination, it is clear based on publications of Representative data that the risks far outweigh any potential benefits of vaccinating children. And the data are clear. And in the last few weeks now, reports have come in. 1 from Connecticut with oversight from the pathology from the University of Michigan and from the University of Minnesota On 2 teenage boys who died on days 3 4 after the Pfizer vaccine and the parents were horrified to find the children dead at home. Autopsies were performed and the conclusion was crystal clear, the vaccines caused the death With massive heart inflammation and evidence of superimposed catecholamine injury on the heart. Fatal reports have come in from Choi And from Verma, Choi and Korea. Verma from Washington University in St. Louis. It is clear that a vaccine is being PUSHT is being encouraged in mandating that in fact results in death of children. Results in death of children. One death is too many. As I've shared with you, in millions of children receiving the The vaccine they don't die of COVID nineteen respiratory illness, but in fact, they die of the vaccine. Speaker 3: And just a short time ago, I asked doctor Anthony Fauci about the president's Sweeping new requirements. Speaker 4: There are a number of people for one reason or other, who just do not want to comply And get vaccinated. We've got to get them vaccinated. And hopefully, they will do it willingly. If not, there will have to be things that will essentially put pressure on them, such as you're not gonna work in this particular agency or institution, you're not gonna be able to go to this college or this university, Unless, in fact, you get vaccinated. And I believe that once we start doing that, you will see more and more people willingly Get vaccinated. Speaker 3: Los Angeles schools are talking about requiring vaccines for children 12 and up. Is that a a model you think would be useful for other schools around the country? Speaker 4: Lester, I do. I I do believe that that's the case. And this is not anything new. We have requirements for vaccination For a number of other diseases in the school system, so it would not be a unique situation to have requirements of children 12 years old and older to have the vaccination for COVID nineteen. Speaker 5: Just days after getting their 2nd COVID nineteen vaccine, 2 teenage boys died in their sleep. Medical experts have been investigating what happened and has now released their report. An epidemiologist says it adds to a body of evidence that confirms Pfizer's vaccine can lead to death in children. NTD's Miguel Moreno reports. Speaker 6: To attend class in some parts of the country, Kids need to be vaccinated against COVID nineteen. The federal government says they're safe, but gives them warning labels of what could lead to death. Speaker 1: This myocarditis warning that is out on Pfizer, Moderna is very serious. Speaker 6: Epidemiologist Peter McCullough Says this in light of a new report. Its authors investigated the cases of 2 teenage boys from different states. Both of them had received 2nd doses of the Pfizer vaccine, only to die a few days later in their sleep. McCullough says that in his view, the study confirms that Pfizer's vaccines led to the deaths of the teenagers. Speaker 0: Right? These are crimes that are being committed and we need to stop those crimes. But the only way we can do that is to have the corporations that are she administering these agents liable for the damage they're creating. Because I can assure you But the day Moderna or Pfizer or Gilead knows that they will have civil penalties add up to $100,000,000 per count. For every death and every injury they created, I can assure you, they'll stop supplying the injection. They'll stop supplying Remdesivir. The minute they know that they are on the hook for the liabilities they're actually creating, they'll stop doing this. So what we're doing right now is we're working very aggressively to take felony convictions forward, so that we actually have the ability to hold the perpetrators accountable, and ultimately destroy the very fabric of the system that allows human beings to be sacrificed on the alternative agenda. Speaker 7: The vaccine is neither safe nor effective. This is very important. And, you asked about motive. What can motivate a stakeholder? Speaker 2: The stakeholder concept of stakeholder Speaker 7: Act to want to enact a worldwide mass vaccination program of a vaccine itself, which scientifically medically is neither effective nor safe. That has no proven outcomes and want to vaccinate individuals of which the disease doesn't cause any problems. So there is a goal and stated goal to vaccinate children down to 6 months old. Wait a minute. This isn't a disease for 6 months old. It's not even a disease for 20 year olds. The bottom line is this is an innocuous disease that has an incredible age dependence to it. So what started out with this idea that maybe a vaccine could be Good. And we'll just vaccinate nursing home workers and seniors and protect people and get through became this, ever, encroaching ever Expanding mass vaccination program that has, now raised all of our concerns because there's a concern that this isn't about Covet at all. Speaker 2: There were significant obstacles created to suppress access to lifesaving information and lifesaving medications that work incredibly well. Speaker 7: My estimate is 85% of the deaths could have been avoidable. Speaker 2: Well, I think this is genocide And a crime against humanity and mass murder. Speaker 7: Through this vaccine program that We basically have set up exactly what you said, genocide. So can you name any of Speaker 8: the perpetrators now that would be likely To the, Speaker 0: trial Absolutely. So at prosecute now dot I o, we have a ton of information including a series of draft indictments. We specifically call out the perpetrators in chief. We know that Anthony Fauci colluded with Ralph Barrett in 2014 to violate the gain of function moratorium and weaponize Coronavirus. We know that happened. And we know it because we have their documents in their own writing that admit to that. We know that Ralph Barrick and Peter Daszak worked together with the Wuhan Institute of Virology so that in 2016, they could publish a paper that said that the SARS coronavirus was poised for human emergence. And the virus they made reference to was one called WIV1, which stands for Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus 1. See, these are those things that are so self evidently criminal. That in 2016, during the gain of function moratorium, we could have a Chinese weaponized virus ready to be poised for human emergence. And out of the back of that, we actually have the admission by Peter Daschke, by Ralph Barrick, and by Anthony Fauci, that there is going to be a pandemic that's gonna happen under the presidency of Donald Trump. Speaker 9: Given as you heard from the introduction that I have been around For a while and have had the opportunity and the privilege and the pleasure of serving in 5 administrations, I thought I would bring that perspective to the topic today is the issue of pandemic, preparedness. And if there's 1 message That I want to leave with you today based on my experience, and you'll see that in a moment, is that there is no question that There will be a challenge to the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases, both chronic infectious diseases in Sense of already ongoing disease and we have certainly a large burden of that, but also there will be a surprise outbreak. And I hope by the end of my relatively short Presentation, you will understand why history, the history of the last 32 years that I've been the Director of NIAID will tell The next administration that there's no doubt in anyone's mind that they will be faced with the challenges that their predecessors were faced with. Speaker 0: These are all things that are out in the public. These are admissions of racketeering. They're admissions of collusion. They're admissions of premeditated murder. By the time we get to 2018, and this is the most important piece of all of this crime. Ralph Barrick, the inventor and the weaponizer of coronavirus also had the hand in developing Remdesivir. The drug that was allegedly used to treat patients with COVID, except for the fact that by 2018, that drug had a kill ratio of 53%. Documented. Published. It was so deadly that the World Health Organization itself pulled the drug from consideration for Ebola treatments. And ironically, inside of the documents that nobody bothers reading, the death rate occurred regardless of viral load, which means that people were killed who didn't even have Ebola. We murdered people. And by we, I mean, The complacent and ignorant masses that have agreed to let these things go unchecked, murdered people in Africa, The death rate at 53%, and we let that publication of information in 2018 failed to inform our decision in the spring of 2020. When Anthony Fauci, Ralph Baer, Peter Dashick, and others made the decision that we should inject Remdesivir into patients with COVID. We knew we were going to kill people. That's premeditated murder. We knew we were gonna do it, and we went along with it anyway. And sitting right next to the president, Donald Trump, he signed the death warrant from millions of Americans with the criminals sitting right next to him. Possibly one of the most interesting coups in human history where the perpetrators of the coup were literally sitting in the oval office on a sofa right next to the president. And what he didn't know is that he was signing the death warrant to American citizens. Speaker 4: Can you do that and present a little bit detail because it's it's it's quite good news. I'd be happy to share You Speaker 7: wanna talk about it now? Yeah. Please. Speaker 4: Okay. So, a trial that the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Which is the institute I direct sponsored called the Adaptive Co virus Disease Treatment Trial or ACCT one Was started in February 21st, of this year and it was a randomized placebo controlled trial Comparing the Gilead drug Remdesivir with a placebo. Speaker 10: The Gilead study confirmed giving Remdesivir for 10 days To 53 COVID nineteen patients early on before May 2020, they found that it caused multiple organ failure, Acute kidney failure, septic shock, and hypotension in 31% of all people they gave it to. And multiple people in that 10 day trial, Their kidneys died and needed emergency kidney transplants. Why did this get my attention? March April of 2020, New York City was reporting as the epicenter of COVID nineteen in America. Every press conference I watched when they were interviewing medical doctors, They all stated the same thing every time. Every time we start treating these respiratory virus patients with this new novel coronavirus, This respiratory virus moves from the lungs and goes to the kidneys. We have never seen a respiratory virus ever attack kidneys like this before. It causes such severe acute kidney failure. We're not only short on ventilators, we don't have enough dialysis machines to handle the kidney failure. I knew right away from the Gilead study conducted 2 months earlier that the entire kidney failure, multiple organ failure, was a result of remdesivir and had nothing to do with the virus. And that is absolutely true. I said in May of 2020, went to the media. I said everyone needs to be warned that Anthony Fauci has declared a drug to be the solution to a pandemic for all innocent Americans. He is going to kill Hundreds of thousands if not millions of innocent Americans with this drug. Speaker 11: Attorneys Dan Watkins and Michael Hamilton announced in a national press conference On 7th of this month, the filing of their landmark lawsuit against these 3 major hospitals on behalf of families who lost their loved ones With the bounties paid to hospitals for using Remdesivir. I like that they're using it the bounty that was paid. Speaker 10: 43,000 Pennsylvanians have died from COVID. They died from COVID treatment. Peter McCullough just gave us a a statistic of, like, 93% could have been saved. I'm gonna tell you right now, 40,000 of them died from the ill advised hospital protocols in your hospitals. Speaker 8: So we had, so you can name, Fauci and Barrick. Speaker 0: Dashie. Yep. Speaker 8: There's quite a few others. Speaker 0: Oh, there's a whole host of them. And what's what's being done right now is working together with some very courageous sheriffs, some very courageous DAs. What we're now doing is we're compiling a series of actions where we have now thousands of patients who have died, and we're aggregating those into unified action so that we can actually make a very public statement of what is in fact the felonies that we hope to end the
Saved - April 28, 2023 at 12:25 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The development of Covid19 as an offensive biological warfare weapon involved the FDA, Pentagon, and CDC, with the Harvard Medical School and Ralph Baric also involved. The CDC has a history of offensive biological weapons, including shipping agents to Saddam Hussein. The end goal of many organizations, including DARPA, is population control and reduction while making billions of dollars. Professor Francis Boyle drafted legislation for the Biological Weapons AntiTerrorism Act of 1989 and advises on human rights, war crimes, and biowarfare. The Chinese Communist Government also helped create Covid19 and the lethal Covid vaccines. All citizens are encouraged to file criminal charges of murder and conspiracy to commit murder.

@SpartaJustice - Truth Justice ™

BREAKING NEWS: The FDA was involved in the development of Covid-19 as an offensive biological warfare weapon at UNCBSL3. The Pentagon bought and paid for the toxic mRNA shots and helped create Covid-19. All are guilty of Nuremberg crimes, murder and conspiracy to commit murder. The CDC Director Rochelle Walensky is also accountable for these murders and Nuremberg crimes. The Harvard Medical School was also involved in the development of Covid-19 at the UNCBSL3 lab with Ralph Baric along with the FDA. The CDC has long been involved in offensive biological weapons dating back to the Reagan Administration. The Reagan Administration authorized the CDC to ship biological warfare agents to Saddam Hussein in Iraq hoping he would use them against Iran. U.S. International Lawyer Professor Francis Boyle states the end goal of DARPA, the Pentagon, the FDA, the CDC, the CIA, Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, Ralph Baric, Peter Daszak, Anthony Fauci, the Rockefellers, Rothschilds and many others is population control and reduction while making billions of dollars. New reports show worldwide excess deaths of 12 million innocent people. Professor Boyle drafted the U.S. domestic implementing legislation for the Biological Weapons Convention, known as the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, that was approved unanimously by both Houses of the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President George H.W. Bush. Professor Boyle has also advised numerous international bodies in the areas of human rights, war crimes and genocide, nuclear policy, and bio-warfare. From 1991-92, he served as Legal Advisor to the Palestinian Delegation to the Middle East Peace Negotiations. He goes on to say that the population control and reduction objective goes back to the National Security directive by the Henry Kissinger Report written in 1974 which stated that it was in the best interest of National Security for the United States and for Overseas Interests to have a population control and reduction policy. The National Security Study Memorandum NSSM200 Implications of Worldwide Population Growth For U.S. Security and Overseas Interests (THE KISSINGER REPORT) dated December 10, 1974 was Classified and Confidential until it was Declassified on 7/3/89. Read the entire report to understand what they are doing. All citizens of the world are strongly encouraged to go to their local Sheriff's Office, Police Office and District or State Attorney General's Office and file criminal charges of murder and conspiracy to commit murder, demanding that the people responsible be arrested and prosecuted. This must be done, be brave and act now humanity. The Chinese Communist Government also helped the Pentagon and the FDA create Covid-19. They new they were developing a dangerous offensive biological warfare weapon with gain of function properties that had HIV DNA genetically engineered into it and was combined with nanotechnology in order to aerosolize it enabling the bioweapon to travel up to 30 feet in the air. They deliberately created both biological warfare weapons Covid-19 and the lethal Covid vaccines long before the Pandemic and then they created a fraudulent Pandemic in order to release these deadly biological weapons of war on humanity to kill millions of innocent people worldwide.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the involvement of various entities in the development and distribution of mRNA vaccines, referring to them as "mRNA Franken shots." They claim that DARPA, the Pentagon, and the FDA are responsible for both creating the COVID-19 virus and the vaccines. They argue that these actions constitute murder and conspiracy to commit murder. The speaker also suggests that the goal of these actions is population control and reduction. They mention threats made to politicians who were initially interested in investigating these matters. The speaker concludes by emphasizing the importance of citizens reporting these issues to law enforcement and seeking accountability for those responsible.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think you're right. I think that, as I've recommended before, Stu, anyone, could go in and file a complaint with a law enforcement, authority, for, murder conspiracy to commit murder, and and demand that people be arrested and prosecuted. And by the way, I did want to draw to the attention of your audience this press release 2013 where these your RNA, frank shots come from. DARPA Awards Moderna Therapeutics a grant for up to $25,000,000 to develop messenger RNA therapeutics. So notice DARPA is the Pentagon. Let me repeat that. DARPA is the Pentagon. The Pentagon bought, paid for envisioned these mRNA Franken shots. And I should also point out for Dietrich was involved in the development of COVID nineteen, the offensive biological warfare weapon at the University of North Carolina BSL 3. So the Pentagon is both sides of the argument here. They're developing the the weapon and the, alleged vaccines, which is also a weapon. But but the proof is right here. Speaker 1: So there's not a law as far as we understand from where we sit In this country, federal level, state level, municipal level, that protects anybody from deploying a weapon of biowarfare. It doesn't give them any kind of liability shield. There's no immunity to liability in a sense. So wouldn't it be true that this Narrative about, congressional liability for Pfizer is kind of a psyop. Speaker 0: That's correct, to the, liability that deals with civil liability, payment of damages. Here, we are talking about criminal responsibility. And in my book, Resisting Medical Tyranny, I outlined the case for why the, executives involved in the companies, developing these, MRNI, Franken shots are guilty of murder and conspiracy to commit murder. Yes. And you saw that report last week from Portugal that, upwards of 300,000 Americans now had been murdered, as a result of these mRNA, Franken shots. So, this is quite serious. We cannot, tolerate, more Americans getting murdered, by the Nazis who run these, corporations. And if you look at the, jab resolution, clearly, what we have here is twofold, a violation of the Nuremberg code on medical experimentation, exactly what the United States government prosecuted Nazi doctors for at Nuremberg, and some were executed. Now I'm against the death penalty. So okay. But that gives you the, idea of how severe the situation is. And then 2nd, as the, jab resolution correctly says, this is a Nuremberg crime against humanity. And Stu, what since this is so important, let me, read for you the definition of a Nuremberg crime against humanity. This was put in to Nuremberg charter by the United States to deal with the Nazi persecution of German Jews. Let me read this here. Speaker 1: Yeah, please. Speaker 0: Crimes against humanity, murder, extermination, and other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population. The American people are being treated here like the Nazis treated German Jews, 300,000 are now dead. When are we going to stop this? Speaker 1: Yeah. What is the threshold for death exactly? That brings me to another point. So you're talking about the executives at the companies that helped to manufacture and then distribute these shots. What about The people inside of our government, they wouldn't be immune from criminal liability either. They ordered this up in a sense, didn't they? Speaker 0: That's correct. Would that would depend on, certainly the FDA that has approved these, Franken shots. They violated the Nuremberg code on medical experimentation and have committed a Nuremberg crime against humanity and arguably are responsible for or could be, indicted for murder and conspiracy to commit murder. Again, that requires, mens rea, on their part, and malice of forethought. My book basically dealt with the, chief executive officers and the chief scientific officers, for the mRNA Franken shots. But, yes, the FDA officials, who approved it have, accountability as well. I should also point out, Stu, that, the FDA itself was involved in the development of COVID nineteen as an offensive biological warfare weapon at the UNC BSL 3. Let me read to you the, contract, and it says who helped develop this thing among others? National Center For Toxicological Research, Food and Drug Administration. So the same people, the FDA, the same agency that is approving these franken shots, these Nazi franken shots, have been involved in the development of COVID nineteen, an offensive biological warfare weapon with gain of function properties that were applied at the University of North Carolina BSL three, Stu. Speaker 1: With Ralph Barrick's involvement, This is where Ralph Barrett comes in. That's correct. Yep. Okay. So and then what about moving downward downhill to the CDC who recommended these, to is adding them to the childhood vaccination schedule. What about the media who ran with the safe and effective narrative? Fox is still airing commercials. It's time for your next booster. Go get your next booster. These people clearly the BBC hitting me all the time saying that I'm a conspiracy theorist, a radical conspiracy theorist on these shots. What about accountability for these people as well? Speaker 0: I think the CDC she also has accountability. The current, director, Walensky, Biden appointed. She's from the Harvard Medical School. Harvard Medical School is also involved in the development of the COVID nineteen at the UNCBSL three was Ralph Barrick along with the FDA. The CDC has been up to its eyeballs in offensive biological warfare, weapons going back to the Reagan administration. When the Reagan administration authorized the CDC and American type, culture collection, to ship 40 shipments of weapons they knew were weapon specific biological warfare agents to Saddam Hussein in Iraq in the hope and expectation that he would weaponize them and use them against. And then US troops after goal 41 went in there, blew these biowarfare labs up and contaminated themselves. Speaker 1: Are there are there politicians are there members of our Federal government, I'm talking about, you know, in the House of Representatives or in the United States Senate that are on committees that had the intel about this gain of function, weapon of biowarfare being, you know, manufactured, concocted, and whipped up at Fort Detrick University in North Carolina Chapel that that the FDA was involved. I mean, ostensibly, it would seem to me that there would be people inside of our government that would know and have a forethought that this was going to happen. Speaker 0: I think, senator Rand Paul, from what I've seen is the one who has the, best comprehension of what's going on here. Speaker 1: But did they know beforehand? Did they know that this was going to be developed at the time? I mean, would they have known this? Would they have received intel documents that said, hey. We're going to make a weapon of biowarfare here in the United States. We're gonna ship it offshore, and then we're going to release it on the world population. Speaker 0: Well, Stu, I've been saying this for many years. If you, take a look at a, there's a award winning documentary called anthrax wars, 2009 by Cohn and Nadler. You can get it online, dealing with the existential dangers presented by these BSL threes and BSL fours, and they asked me because of my expertise, to consult with them. And at the end of this, documentary, I say in the starkest terms possible. This is a catastrophe waiting to happen, unquote. Now that was 2009. So, yes, at least my viewpoints on these matters have been out there in the, public record. Indeed, in, 2001. I was the 1st to blow the, whistle on the fact that Amerithrax, came out of a US biological warfare, weapon and, weapons program and laboratory. That was, November 3 at, Harvard Divinity School where the Council For Responsible Genetics was holding its convention, and I was conducting a, workshop against biological warfare weapons. I said that to Fox TV, November 3. The next day or the the Monday after that. I sent it to Pacific Radio Network, and then I was on the BBC. The whole world heard me. And then, I was censored off of everywhere, after that point an order was given, and no, mainstream news media western mainstream news media has ever interviewed me again. Speaker 1: So I'm gonna ask you to speculate here, a little bit, and I I know that you like to stick with facts, but what is the What is the game for the people who whipped this up and then released it? What is the game for DARPA, the Pentagon, Ralph Baric, Fauci, EcoHealth Alliance, Peter Daszak, all what what is their what is the end goal here, I guess? What's the end game? Speaker 0: I think it's population control and reduction, Stu. We if you read the reports now, worldwide, there'd been excess deaths of about 12,000,000 people. So I think that's the, ultimate goal. Remember, that goes back to the, infamous, national security directed by, Henry Kissinger that it is in the national security interest of the United States, for our policy to be population control and reduction. I've never read that that was released. And then, of course, everyone's making large amounts of money, off of this as well. Speaker 1: As a lawyer, you represented world governments in the International Court of Justice. Why wouldn't any of our I mean, so you're no hack. Why why wouldn't any of our elected representatives in the senate or congress take you seriously when you're warning about this? Why would they write you off Okay. Speaker 0: I believe they've been threatened. I I have contacted I've been in touch with members of congress about this matter and so there and after they were threatened. For example, the, one member of Congress, was consulting me on one matter, and I raised, with him the, Ebola, pandemic in, West Africa, Walter Jones. He was a very powerful member of the, house on services committee. He was consulting me on another matter, getting my legal opinion, and since he represented, for Bragg down there where everyone were being deployed, you know, I said congressman, he knew my expertise. I said, congressman Jones, this, West African Ebola pandemic, came out of the, KENEMA BSL 4. It's extremely dangerous, and, I think you've gotta do something to keep your, troops there from being deployed, by the Obama administration is a is a propaganda stunt. It it's extremely, dangerous. This is a biological warfare, at work. And congressman Jones, said we we discussed the matter, and then he said, I'll get on it right away. I'll put my, top staffer, in touch with you, and and we'll get on this right away because these were his his constituents. What happened, I was completely cut off. Obviously, someone had threatened congressman Jones. He no longer returned my phone calls, no emails, no messages, no one in his staff either. Now who would be able to threaten an extremely powerful member of the House Armed Services, Committee, to not even act on behalf of his own constituents there. And what was their threat? I don't know. But it this personally, happened to me. Yes. And even when after congressman Jones died, I said condolences, to his office. They didn't even acknowledge receipt of, of my condolences. Speaker 1: I think we probably know why. Certainly not every sheriff has been gotten to. Do you think that that's the course of action here is for citizens to go to their sheriff and report that they've been assaulted with a weapon of biowarfare? Speaker 0: Yes. And also go to your, district attorney, state's attorney, county attorney. I'm dealing with the county attorney down there, at, Collier County. He he's involved in, drafting their health, freedom declaration. We're we're making progress on And Speaker 1: then there needs to be an enforcement mechanism in that in that resolution, for how we move forward And what we do with the people who are responsible for this deployment and then what we do with the stockpiles of this deployment, I think it's pretty clear at this point. I mean, it needs to be seized, it needs to be incinerated, And the people responsible for it need to be put on trial and handed down sentences. Speaker 0: That's not to excuse the Chinese Communist government. They knew full well. They were developing an existentially dangerous offensive biological warfare weapon with gain of function properties with HIV, DNA genetically engineered into there, and that was, subjected to, nanotechnology, to to aerosolize it. This stuff will travel up to 30 feet in the air. So I'm not excusing them at all. But but they were developing Speaker 1: it. The the Wuhan Institute of Virology then is, by definition, a bioweapons lab. Pardon me? The Wuhan Institute of Virology then, by definition, is a bioweapons lab. Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. That's China's Fort Detrick, Stu. What happened was, obviously, president g there, decided that he wanted to play with the big boys, and the big boys had a BSL 4 like we do, r four Dietrich or the British at, Porton Doute, and he was going to have his own, BSL 4 and his offense his own, monopoly of offensive biological warfare weapons just as bad as anything we have. Right. Speaker 1: Founded by the US taxpayer, and there's no shortage of that going on around the world either as we have reported on this program ad nauseam. Dozens of these bioweapons labs just like the Institute of Virology in Wuhan Located in Ukraine where we're sending 100 of 1,000,000,000 of dollars, and now we're getting reports about the same happening in Taiwan. Interestingly enough, the military industrial complex wants US boots on the ground there. Lindsey Graham, the Pfizer whore, the fossil in the DC beltway there is advocating for US boots on the ground in Taiwan. Seems that they know where all of the bodies are buried, professor Boyle. Thank you so much for coming here. We
Saved - May 5, 2023 at 2:53 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Robert Kennedy Jr. claims that Dr. Fauci knew Remdesivir would cause kidney and heart failure. Dr. Paul Marik says the government incentivizes hospitals to prescribe the toxic drug. Dr. David Martin says Remdesivir was pulled from consideration for Ebola treatments. He accuses Fauci and others of premeditated murder for injecting it into COVID patients. VigilantFox has a log of thousands of videos on COVID and injections.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

.@RobertKennedyJr: "Tony Fauci Knew That Remdesivir Would Kill You" "How does it kill you?" he asked. "Kidney failure, heart failure, and all-organ collapse." "All the doctors said. You heard it again and again. 'We've never seen a virus that attacks the kidneys.' Because it wasn't the virus; it was the remdesivir."

Video Transcript AI Summary
At home, it is recommended to treat viral replication by giving remedies like zinc and hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, which reduce the spread of the disease. However, the protocol followed was different. No treatment was given until hospitalization, where ventilators and Remdesivir were used. It is known that Remdesivir can be harmful, as it caused side effects in Ebola patients. The drug was manipulated and made standard of care, leading to kidney failure, heart failure, and organ collapse in COVID-19 patients. The deaths during the pandemic were often attributed to kidney failure, which was caused by Remdesivir, not the virus itself.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You wanna treat them at home. Give them the things that we know kill viral replication. Zinc and anything that enhances zinc, like hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, and a 100 other remedies that we now know dramatically reduce the spread of this disease. And what was our protocol? Our protocol was to do none of that. No treatment until you go to the hospital. Then, your treatment are 2 things that are bound to kill you, ventilators and Remdesivir. And Tony Fauci knew that Remdesivir would kill you. He knew that because in 2019, he tried to put use it for Ebola 2019. He tried to use it for Ebola, and within 5 days of treatment, it gave legal side effect to 54% of the people in the safety monitoring board ordered him to terminate the use of that drug. And he threw a phony, contrived, absolutely fraudulent study that he manipulated and orchestrated. That drug Made standard of care, it is homicide. And if you look, how does it kill people? Two ways, 3 ways. Kidney failure, heart failure, and all organ collapse. And what happened to the people who died in the pandemic? What were they dying of? Kidney failure. All the doctors said, you heard it again and again. We've never seen a virus that attacks the kidneys because it wasn't the virus. It was the Remdesivir.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Death by Remdesivir: Under Fauci, We Had the Highest Body Count in the World "It [Remdesivir] was Tony Fauci's pet drug. We were the only ones that had it for a year. And we – in our country – we have 4.2% of the global population; we had almost 20% of global deaths from COVID. How is that a success story?" asked @RobertKennedyJr.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Liberals' concerns about wealth distribution were disregarded during the pandemic, resulting in a massive shift of wealth from the poor and middle class to the super rich. The lockdowns created 500 new billionaires. The strict adherence to protocols, including the use of the toxic and ineffective drug Andesmear, did not prevent our country from having the highest death rate from COVID. Despite having only 4.2% of the global population, we accounted for almost 20% of global deaths. In contrast, Nigeria, with a 1% vaccination rate and reliance on hydroxychloroquine, had a much lower death rate. The lack of vaccinations in the developing world disproved predictions of mayhem.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In our country, all of the things that liberals care about, which is kind of equal distribution of wealth, with around, you know, 20 30, 40 years of progress thrown out the window. There was a $3,900,000,000,000 dollar $1,000,000,000,000 shift in wealth from the poor and middle class in our country to the super rich. We created 500 new billionaires during the lockdowns. It it was a war on the poor and a war on children. Blacks suffered 3.6 times the death rate as whites. And, you know, there's the other country by the way, our country had the strictest adherence to all of these protocols, including the use of And desmear, which is enormously toxic and completely, utterly inefficacious. But, you know, it was totally Fauci's pet drug. We were the only ones that had it for a year. And we, in our country, we have 4.2% the global population. We had about a 18% of the almost 20% of global deaths from COVID. That was not a success story. We which we did everything we were supposed to do in this country more than any other country except for Australia, And we have the highest body count of any country in the world. The the death rate in our country was 3,000 people dead from COVID per million population. In Nigeria, which has a 1% vaccination rate and where the entire population basically is on hydroxychloroquine and hydrogen for malaria and liver blindness. They had a death rate of 14 teen people per million population. So they didn't even have a pandemic. Yeah. These were the countries that Tony Fauci said, oh, there's gonna be mayhem in the developing world. Well, guess what? There was no vaccinations available to the developing world. And there was no COVID death.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Dr. Paul Marik (@Drpaulmarik1) in January 2022: "The federal government is incentivizing hospitals to prescribe a medication which is toxic."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Multiple studies, including one by the WHO, show that Remdesivir actually increases the risk of death. It's concerning that the federal government incentivizes hospitals to prescribe this toxic drug by offering a 20% bonus on the entire hospital bill for Medicare patients. Remdesivir costs around $3,000 per course. On the other hand, Ivermectin, as mentioned by Dr. Kory, reduces the risk of death by about 50%. Unfortunately, clinicians still use the wrong drug, Dexamethasone, in the wrong dose and for the wrong duration of time, simply because the NIH recommends it. The NIH and other agencies have disregarded multiple FDA-approved drugs that are both cost-effective and safe.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you look at the 4 independent studies, including the large study by the WHO, it shows the opposite effect. Remdesivir increases the risk of death. Let me say that again. Remdesivir the This is a toxic drug. But just to make the situation even more preposterous, The federal government will give hospitals a 20% bonus on the entire hospital bill If they prescribe Remdesivir to Medicare patients, the federal government is incentivizing hospitals to prescribe a medication which is toxic. So it should be noted that Remdesivir costs about $3,000 a course. Doctor. Kory spoke about Ivermectin. Ivermectin reduces the risk of death by about 50%. So as regards Dexamethasone, this is the wrong drug in the wrong dose For the wrong duration of time, yet every clinician in this country will absurdly use This homeopathic dose of dexamethasone. Why? Because the NIH tells them to do this. So what the NIH and other agencies have ignored are multiple FDA approved drugs. These are FDA approved drugs. These are not experimental drugs, which are cost effective and safe and

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

'It Has No Place in Medicine': The U.S. Government Will Give a 20% Bonus for Prescribing a Toxic Drug Dr. Paul Marik (in December 2022) recalled how his hospital did not allow him to use methylprednisolone or vitamin C for Covid-19. Instead, they wanted him to use remdesivir, a drug that "will increase your risk of developing renal failure 20-fold." Dr. Marik (@Drpaulmarik1) revealed, "The federal government will give hospitals a 20% bonus on the entire hospital bill if you prescribe this toxic medication. So you can see how the hospitals and the healthcare systems are now subservient to industry rather than being what's best for their patients."

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker shares their frustration with their hospital's restrictions on using off-label drugs like methylprednisolone and vitamin C. They criticize the hospital for not allowing the use of vitamin C, which they consider a basic and safe drug. Instead, the hospital promotes the use of Remdesivir, despite its known risks. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), Remdesivir increases the risk of kidney failure by twentyfold and the risk of death by about 4%. The speaker believes that hospitals prioritize industry interests over patient well-being, as they receive a 20% bonus for prescribing this toxic medication.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In my hospital, I was banned or discouraged from using off label drugs which we use every day. Methylprednisolone, vitamin c. My hospital would not allow me to use vitamin c. We're talking about basic safe drugs and it's an outrage. What they wanted me to use was Remdesivir, where Remdesivir we know and this is not controversial, We know according to the WHO, remdesivir increases your risk of kidney failure twentyfold. Remdesivir will increase your risk of developing renal failure twentyfold. It increases your risk of dying by about 4%. It has no place in medicine yet the federal government will give hospitals a 20% bonus on the entire hospital bowl if you prescribe this toxic medication. So you can see how the hospitals and the healthcare systems are Now subservient to industry rather than doing what's best for their patients.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Dr. David Martin: 'We Murdered People' With Remdesivir "It [Remdesivir] was so deadly that the World Health Organization itself pulled the drug from consideration for Ebola treatments," denoted Dr. Martin. "We let that publication of information in 2018 fail to inform our decision in the spring of 2020 — when Anthony Fauci, Ralph Baric, Peter Daszak, and others made the decision that we should inject Remdesivir into patients with COVID. We knew we were going to kill people — that's premeditated murder — we knew we were going to do it. And we went along with it anyway."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ralph Barrick, the inventor of coronavirus and developer of Remdesivir, a drug used to treat COVID, had a hand in both. However, Remdesivir had a high kill ratio of 53% and was pulled by the World Health Organization for Ebola treatment. Despite this, in 2020, Anthony Fauci and others decided to use Remdesivir on COVID patients, knowing it would cause deaths. This was premeditated murder, with the criminals sitting next to President Donald Trump. There are other individuals involved as well. Efforts are being made by courageous sheriffs and DAs to compile evidence of the deaths caused by Remdesivir and take legal action to end these felonies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ralph Barrick, the inventor and the weaponizer of coronavirus also had the hand in developing Remdesivir, The drug that was allegedly used to treat patients with COVID, except for the fact that by 2018, that drug at a kill ratio of 53%. Documented. Published. It was so deadly That the World Health Organization itself pulled the drug from consideration for Ebola treatments. And ironically, inside of the documents that nobody bothers reading, The death rate occurred regardless of viral load, which means that people were killed who didn't even have Ebola. We murdered people. And by we, I mean, the complacent and ignorant masses that have agreed to let these things go unchecked. Murdered people in Africa. The death rate at 53%, and we let that publication of information in 2018 failed to inform our decision in the spring of 2020. When Anthony Fauci, Ralph Baer, Peter Dashick and others made the decision that we should inject Remdesivir in the patients with COVID. We knew we were going to kill people. That's premeditated murder. We knew we were gonna do it, and we went along with it anyway. And sitting right next to the president, Donald Trump, he signed the death warrant from millions of Americans with the criminals sitting right next to Possibly one of the most interesting coups in human history, where the perpetrators of the coup were literally sitting in the Oval Office on a sofa right next to the president. And what he didn't know is that he was signing the death warrant to American citizens. So we had, so you've named, Fauci and Barrick. Dashiek. Yep. There's quite a few others. Oh, there's a whole host of them. And what's What's being done right now is working together with some very courageous sheriffs, some very courageous DAs. What we're now doing is we're compiling a series of actions Where we have now thousands of patients who have died, and we're aggregating those into unified action so that we can actually make a very public statement of what is in fact the felonies that we hope to end the

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

I have a log of thousands of clipped videos at my fingertips with respect to COVID-19 and the subsequent injections. If you appreciate my work and want to help fund the information war, please hit the subscribe button on my profile page (@VigilantFox) for exclusive posts.

Saved - June 17, 2023 at 8:29 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Records show that Ben Hu, likely patient zero for COVID-19, was funded by Fauci and USAID for dangerous GainOfFunction experiments in Wuhan. Fauci lied under oath. The US Govt is responsible for COVID-19 and unsafe vaccines. This is the biggest crime against humanity in history. Those responsible must be arrested and jailed, and the US Govt must pay reparations.

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

This is big: Records obtained in a lawsuit against NIH prove that Ben Hu, COVIDs likely patient zero, was funded directly by Anthony Fauci, @NIH and @USAID to conduct dangerous #GainOfFunction experiments in Wuhan. Fauci lied under oath. Please seek prosecution @SenRandPaul

@WhiteCoatWaste - White Coat Waste Project 🥼🗑️

@NIH @USAID 🧾We've got the receipts: Here is the NIH document obtained via a 2021 WCW lawsuit proving that COVIDs likely "Patient Zero" Ben Hu was receiving US tax $ from @NIH & @USAID (Via EcoHealth) for #GainOfFunction animal experiments at the Wuhan lab👇 https://blog.whitecoatwaste.org/2023/06/15/covid-origin-wcw-investigation-proves-u-s-govt-funded-patient-zero/

COVID Origin: WCW investigation proves U.S. Govt Funded “Patient Zero” If lead Wuhan white coat Ben Hu is patient zero, then White Coat Waste Project's investigation reveals the origin of COVID. blog.whitecoatwaste.org

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

This is no longer a "conspiracy theory". The US Govt is responsible for #Covid19, millions of deaths and millions of people damaged by unsafe vaccines. Every family that lost someone and every person who suffered now has definitive proof that the US Govt did this to you.

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

This is the biggest crime against humanity in the history of the world. The US Govt killed more people with Covid-19 than the Nazis killed Jews during the holocaust. Those responsible need to be arrested and jailed. The US Govt must be shamed around the world and pay reparations.

Saved - June 23, 2025 at 10:34 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 1965, scientists discovered and began modifying the coronavirus through animal studies. By 1990, Pfizer created the first spiked protein vaccine but found it ineffective due to the virus's rapid mutation. In 2002, UNC patented a bioweapon version of the virus, leading to concerns about biowarfare. A 2015 National Academy of Sciences statement highlighted the profit motives behind vaccine development. In 2019, Moderna patented a vaccine for potential pathogen releases. By 2023, Congress uncovered unreported funding to the Wuhan Institute, raising questions about the origins of the virus and treatments.

@kacdnp91 - Kelly DNP Functional/Integrative Medicine

1965 Scientists first discovered the coronavirus & began to modify it by studying it in animals https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1547.long

Covid-19: First coronavirus was described in The BMJ in 1965 The first description of human coronavirus—a family of viruses that now includes SARS-CoV-2, the cause of the current covid-19 pandemic—was published in The BMJ in 1965. The research, led by virologist David Tyrrell at the Common Cold Unit in Wiltshire, England, involved studying nasal washings from volunteers.1 The researchers found that they could grow several viruses associated with the common cold, but not all of them. One such sample, referred to as B814, turned out to be what we now know as a coronavirus. Using the original B814 nasal swab from a “boy with a typical common cold in 1960,” the team obtained more secretions … bmj.com

@kacdnp91 - Kelly DNP Functional/Integrative Medicine

1990 Pfizer created 1st spiked protein vaccine based on these animal experiments. Pfizer learned the 💉did not work bc the coronavirus was malleable (Modifies/mutates too rapidly for a vaccine to be effective. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2170676/

Assembly of coronavirus spike protein into trimers and its role in epitope expression - PubMed The folding and oligomerization of coronavirus spike protein were explored using a panel of monoclonal antibodies. Chemical cross-linking and sedimentation experiments showed that the spike of transmissible gastroenteritis virus is a homotrimer of the S membrane glycoprotein. The spike protein was s … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@kacdnp91 - Kelly DNP Functional/Integrative Medicine

2002 UNC Chapel Hill patented an “infectious replication defective” clone of the coronavirus. A bioweapon. Patent based on research by Anthony Fauci & only granted after the CDC intervened.

@kacdnp91 - Kelly DNP Functional/Integrative Medicine

2005 The scientific community labeled the coronavirus “biowarfare enabling technology”

@kacdnp91 - Kelly DNP Functional/Integrative Medicine

2015 Statement from National Academy of Sciences reveals one of the true objectives of the 💉…profit.

@kacdnp91 - Kelly DNP Functional/Integrative Medicine

It read, “To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, we need to increase the public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures, such as the pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus, vaccine. A key driver is the media, & the economics will follow the hype.”

@kacdnp91 - Kelly DNP Functional/Integrative Medicine

2019 Moderna received a patent for a vaccine that included the statement, “for the accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen.”

@kacdnp91 - Kelly DNP Functional/Integrative Medicine

2023 The US Congress discovered an additional & unreported $2million in research funding to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. This funding was again transferred indirectly through EcoHealth Alliance, Fauci’s favorite partner.

@kacdnp91 - Kelly DNP Functional/Integrative Medicine

Since 2005, over &10 billion has been funneled to research institutions @ the direction of Fauci & the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) to illegally fund GOF research and the development of the mRNA “vaccines.”

@kacdnp91 - Kelly DNP Functional/Integrative Medicine

Manipulation & betrayal from Big Pharma and the NIH, CDC, and FDA brazenly disregarding the health & welfare of the American people.

@kacdnp91 - Kelly DNP Functional/Integrative Medicine

So ask yourself, what came first? The manufactured virus or the manufactured treatment? Someone check on Ralph Baric @ UNC please…

Saved - September 15, 2023 at 4:50 AM

@BlackTomThePyr8 - Tom Czerniawski

COVID is a bio-weapon, and they had a role in creating it. (You know this, because you heard from @AGHuff - you should have listened then. Now's your chance to make good. Don't blow it this time. Please.) This is what they're covering up:

Saved - January 31, 2024 at 8:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The FDA's current and former directors, Robert Califf, Stephen Hahn, and Scott Gottlieb, are accused of prioritizing profits over people's lives. They revoked the emergency use authorization for hydroxychloroquine in favor of expensive therapies from BigPharma. Califf has ties to pharmaceutical companies and Genentech, while Hahn instructed the distribution of hydroxychloroquine nationwide. They manipulated COVID testing and treatment to control the patient care process. Hahn later became the Chief Medical Officer of Flagship Pioneering, the venture firm behind Moderna. #TheNoticingContinues

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

💥FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION (FDA): 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 Y’all get ready for some more uncomfortable truths about the FDA’s current and former Directors, ROBERT CALIFF, STEPHEN M. HAHN and SCOTT GOTTLIEB. 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 💥CLIFFS: Evidence overwhelmingly suggests they not only WANTED PEOPLE TO DIE TO MAXIMIZE PROFITS, but they agreed to do BigPharma’s bidding as MERCENARIAL HITMAN. So, where are we headed from here, you ask?🤔 💥Spoilers: That “You are not a horse…” tweet from their official @US_FDA account will ultimately prove fatal for them and their entire organization before all shakes out. They’ve been fighting like hell in court to marginalize the weight people should put into recommendations they clearly make from their official accounts. At best, it was felony murder on their part. At worst, it was crimes against humanity and genocide. #TheNoticingContinues

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

💥I mean, they initially granted an EUA to HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE (HCQ) for off-label treatment of COVID, then strangely revoked it in favor of some newly-developed (and extremely costly) therapies from BigPharma. (😳😳😳😳😳) 💥Not even kidding. Studies be damned, if BigPharma orders them to, they’ll approve a brand new, marginally-effective (or ineffective) drug no problemo, even despite best advice of its own independent advisors. Just as long as the new drug meets one key criteria: 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 IT’S EXPENSIVE AF. 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

💥ROBERT M. CALIFF has been a good little servant to BigPharma: ☑️WEF ANNUAL MEETING 2018 (On behalf of DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM) ☑️FOUNDER, DUKE CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE, which runs RESEARCH TRIALS for PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 FUN FACT: His institute receives $320,000,000/year, with NEARLY 2/3rds of that coming from: PHARMACEUTICAL AND MEDICAL COMPANIES! 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

By the way, did I mention he gets FEES from… 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 GENENTECH?!😟😨🤯🤬 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 💥You remember them. They have all the patient DNA and data from 23ANDME!!! (Yes, it’s also run by Jews.) 💥He’s also HEAD OF STRATEGY AND POLICY for ALPHABET, INC. Imagine that too!🤣 (Genentech was part of this now-infamous photo: “Obama and the Zionist Jews”.)

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

(There’s more coming, folks. Shit tons more.✌️)

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

💥REHOVOT: Y’all remember them from the stolen 2022 elections in Arizona in favor of illegitimate LARP’ing “governor”, Katie Hobbs? ☑️Yeah, Califf is super excited to be part of the new $123,000,000 ISRAELI-BASED SYNTHETIC MEAT processing plant in NORTH CAROLINA. 💥💥💥💥BELIEVER MEATS (lmfao)💥💥💥💥 ☑️YAAKOV NAHMIAS is a BIOMEDICAL ENGINEER and the FOUNDER of BELIEVER MEATS. And as it turns out, he’s also a PROFESSOR at HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL too! Wow! It’s all so f*cking NEAT, gang! ☑️They even made a huge write-up about it in JANUARY 2023, just weeks after their knowingly fraudulent election was finalized! 💥A special thanks goes out to the “expert legal work” from Mossad’s “Unit for Lawfare Interference in Elections” (il)legal team, led by Marc Elias (Jew) and Sambo Dul.💥 (Yes, the acronym spells “U LIE”. Sorry not sorry.) ☑️Apparently, this’ll finally give Jews the opportunity to eat NON-KOSHER meats for the first time ever and stuff! (More “we tricked God” stuff, folks.🤦🏻‍♂️)

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

NANCY MESSONNIER and ROD ROSENSTEIN are… SIBLINGS?!😳😨🤬 Please, tell us more!!!

@grande_uccello - Grande Uccello

@DecentFiJC @DecentFiJC, look into Nancy Messonnier. She was the tip of the CDC spear during covid. She led all press calls. She was an epidemic intelligence service officer. She was the first to warn that covid was coming here. Her brother? Rod Rosenstein. I have more info if you need it.

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

@Matka1776, here’s the goods on GENENTECH, PFIZER and SEAGEN from last month.🙏🏼✌️😎

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

💥DECEMBER 14, 2023: While you were all distracted, Pfizer quietly acquired SEAGEN (Seattle Genetics, Inc.) for $43,000,000,000. It’s the largest all-cash acquisition in history. If you’re not familiar with SEAGEN, they do lots of research on CANCER and MONOCLONAL ABs. SEAGEN’s current CEO is DAVID R. EPSTEIN. (He was appointed on NOVEMBER 9, 2022... the DAY AFTER THE STOLEN MIDTERMS, folks.) 💥As you can see, many of the usual racketeers were involved with brokering the deal (Guggenheim Securities, LLC., Wachtel, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, Sullivan & Cromwell, LLP., etc., etc.), just so you KNOW it’s legit lol. 💥FUN FACT: They have a COLLABORATION AGREEMENT with GENENTECH, INC. And if you’re sitting there asking yourself “who TF is GENENTECH?” right now, don’t worry. I got you. 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 GENENTECH is the company that paid 23ANDME a cool $60,000,000 for ACCESS TO ALL GENOMIC AND PATIENT DATA THEY HAD, JANUARY 2015!!! 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 Ohhhhh. Well, that’s just super f*cking duper!

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

💥SCOTT GOTTLIEB (Jew): From the same AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE that brought us Zionist morons like NORMAN ORNSTEIN. 💥Right after leaving the FDA, he was appointed to PFIZER’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS and then served as part of a “COVID ADVISORY TEAM” for the GOVERNORS of: ☑️CONNECTICUT🤣 ☑️MASSACHUSETTS🤣 ☑️MARYLAND🤣 Otherwise known as “3 of the most laughably corrupt states in the entire nation”. (Dude is literally a walking punchline.)

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

💥STEPHEN M. HAHN: ☑️UPENN, JOHN MORGAN SOCIETY ☑️Hahn initially sided with Trump on HCQ. ☑️RICK BRIGHT, A HHS WHISTLEBLOWER “complained” in APRIL 2020 that HAHN had instructed PETER GAYNOR, a FEMA ADMINISTRATOR, to DISTRIBUTE HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE TO PHARMACIES NATIONWIDE! (We now know HCQ saves lives and THEY KNEW IT TOO. Rick Bright deserves the death penalty.) ☑️Hahn got upset (alongside other “healthcare experts”) when President Trump (correctly) revoked the FDA’s authority to approve/disprove COVID TESTING KITS for public use. 💥And why was it the correct move, you ask? (Two very key reasons.) 1. Because they knew (thanks to their OWN RESEARCH THEY’D ALREADY DONE) 70% of patients’ medical decisions are based upon the results of what some respective MEDICAL TEST SHOWED! 2. If they could COULD CONTROL/REGULATE BOTH TESTING and TREATMENTS, they could MANIPULATE EVERY STEP OF THE PATIENT CARE PROCESS FOR COVID, from DIAGNOSING TO PRESCRIBING TO TREATING! ☑️They then got to work crafting DELIBERATELY FUDGED HCQ STUDIES and THERAPEUTIC PROTOCOLS TO MAKE HCQ APPEAR DANGEROUS, INEFFECTIVE and TOXIC! ☑️HAHN left office on January 20, 2021 and then 6 MONTHS LATER, he was conveniently named CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER of the VENTURE FIRM behind MODERNA (Feds): 💥💥💥💥FLAGSHIP PIONEERING💥💥💥💥 (Seems he got his reward for being a good little steward of BigPharma and Zionist traitors’ aims!)

Saved - April 6, 2024 at 8:14 PM

@WallStreetSilv - Wall Street Silver

Pfizer under oath: They PLANNED it all, they know what the covid vaccine was for. They used it as a bio weapon against humanity and against our consent. People will never know the true dangers of the COVID vaccine. 🚨🚨🚨 https://t.co/FnjDG6G752

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 questions understanding of vaccine causing myocarditis, mentioning Pfizer's awareness. Speaker 1 doubts if vaccine was tested for stopping transmission before market release. Speaker 0 believes vaccination was optional, not forced.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you or do you not understand the mechanism of why the vaccine causes myocarditis? It looks to me like you don't. Pfizer is aware of reports of myocarditis and pericarditis that have been temporarily associated with vaccination. Was the Pfizer COVID vaccine tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market. Speaker 1: So did we know about stopping immunization before, it entered the market? No. People to have their jobs to keep their jobs were forced to have the vaccination. Now do you retract your statement that they were not forced? Speaker 0: I believe everybody was offered an opportunity to get a vaccine or not get a vaccine. I don't believe that anybody was forced to take a vaccine.
Saved - June 13, 2024 at 5:27 AM

@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill

Did you know that the ‘Covid Vaccine’ was supposed to be a ‘yearly injection’ for the rest of your life…for everyone of ALL ages? Listen below to the FDA admitting to committing Medical Murder, Crimes Against Humanity and Genocide. https://t.co/Qvwe9gE973

Video Transcript AI Summary
Biden aims for annual COVID shots for everyone, benefiting drug companies financially. FDA executive Christopher Cole suggests gradual mandates, including for toddlers. Concerns raised about lack of complete testing for approval, especially for young children under emergency use authorization. Efficacy data standards lower for emergency use. COVID-related cases in toddlers justify approval process.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Biden wants to, but not play as many people as possible. So you can have to get an annual shot. I mean, it hasn't been formally announced yet. They don't wanna, like, violate going out. The drug companies, the food companies, the vaccine companies, they pay us 100 of $1,000,000 a year to hire and keep the reviewers to approve their products. If they can get every person required an annual vaccine, that is a recurring return of, money going into their their company. So how do you know it's already getting approved? Well, they're not going to, I mean, just from everything I've heard, they're not going to not approve this. Speaker 1: Meet Christopher Cole, an executive officer at the FDA with over 20 years experience who claims to be directly involved in the approval process Speaker 2: of the various COVID vaccines. Speaker 0: I think, what's gonna happen is, it's gonna be a gradual thing. Schools are gonna mandate it. Why do they need the third one? For the same reason, that you or I would do the third one. So the tree will bolster your your system, and then there will be an annual, eventually, an annual just like the flu shot. For the toddlers? Well, for everyone. Okay. So the toddlers too then. We'll have to get it. Probably. Okay. I don't completely agree with their The process. What do you mean you don't agree with the process? Well, I mean, they, they don't have all the all the tests right there. So I agree with the thing that it is important to inoculate them, but you can't provide the, the parent as much, a surety as you normally want to. It's an e EUA for all all, all age groups, all designations, and then you have to get approved by specific age groups based on the study. Do you think it's really an emergency for the toddlers? Well, they're all approved under an emergency. The efficacy data doesn't have to be as high. Yeah. The standard is on emergency use authorization is that it does more benefit the harm. I thought their cases weren't that high for 6 months to 4 year olds. They're not, but it because it's, related to COVID, it's under that approval process.
Saved - August 30, 2024 at 11:09 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that a DOJ lawyer has acknowledged that the FDA's actions against ivermectin were a mistake and an abuse of authority. This admission came after doctors successfully sued the government. The lawyer emphasized that the FDA overstepped its bounds by making recommendations on medications, which is the practice of medicine. Additionally, doctors claim that the FDA's pandemic-era tweets led to millions of excess deaths, highlighting the serious consequences of the agency's actions.

@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas

🚨BREAKING: DOJ Lawyer ADMITS FDA War Against Ivermect*n was a Mistake, Abuse of Authority, After Doctors Sue Government and Win “So, what the FDA has done... [is] unquestionably beyond its authority.” “Making a recommendation of what drugs to take or not to take, that’s the practice of medicine. And FDA can’t practice medicine.” The FDA’s “horse medicine” tweets caused a deadly chain reaction - meet the Doctors (@MdBreathe, @RobertApter1) who were victorious against @US_FDA @HHSGov tyranny. #FDATweets

@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas

Doctors say MILLIONS of excess deaths resulted from the FDA’s pandemic-era tweets against ivermect*n. Now, the attorney from the Department of Justice who defended the FDA in court admitted on undercover camera that the government abused its authority. https://www.projectveritas.com/news/fdas-lawyer-admits-agencys-war-against-ivermectin-was-an-abuse-of-authority

FDA’s Lawyer Admits Agency’s War Against Ivermectin was a Mistake, Abuse of Authority, After Doctors Sue Government and WIN | Project Veritas The attorney from the Department of Justice who defended the Food & Drug Administration in court admitted on undercover camera that the agency’s actions were an abuse of authority by the government during its pandemic-era public campaign against Ivermectin to treat COVID-19. projectveritas.com
Saved - October 25, 2024 at 7:36 PM

@MaximeBernier - Maxime Bernier

After killing and injuring countless people with their experimental injection, our “healthcare” death squads are now proceeding to execute those who’ve only been injured. It’s a death cult. https://t.co/cNzoJ5CsNI

Saved - November 17, 2024 at 10:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
These posts highlight a serious accusation against major health organizations and a private equity firm, suggesting involvement in a coordinated scheme. I assert that the claims made are backed by evidence and imply that the consequences could lead to significant legal repercussions for many involved. There's a hint of sarcasm in looking forward to revisiting these claims, indicating a mix of seriousness and dark humor in the discussion.

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

SPOILERS: These two posts will be responsible for more death penalties, life sentences, lost medical/pharmaceutical licenses & corporate dissolutions than just about any two posts on this platform. I’m not saying it’s a contest or anything, but it’s not NOT a contest either.🇺🇸🫡 https://t.co/OBNoMqYDFQ

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

I’m saying he doesn’t know what the fuck he’s talking about. I do. Our FDA, HHS, CDC and NIH were all in on a coordinated murder scheme with Apollo Global Management (Mossad) and NYPH (RAND; CIA; GCHQ; IDF). We’ve got those receipts too. https://t.co/6KS1RvpR6g

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

These’ll be fun to revisit, amirite, @jcat81516? https://t.co/xcXJ3tNH7N

Saved - November 18, 2024 at 12:40 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I noticed that the FDA recently admitted a mistake regarding Ivermectin's dismissal for Covid treatment. It's alarming that 200 members of Congress and their families were treated with it instead of the vaccine. After promoting millions of doses from Big Pharma, they now want to pretend they have morals. Where's the acknowledgment of the jab's dangers, which they knew about in 2020? I believe we should hold the FDA accountable for the Emergency Use Authorization, as they misled us about Ivermectin's safety and effectiveness. This feels like a crime against humanity.

@GinaSaysSo - Gina

Did you happen to notice that earlier in the year the FDA quietly admitted a mistake on trashing Ivermectin to prevent and treat Covid? Well...200 members of Congress and their families were treated with Ivermectin INSTEAD of the jab, so I'm fairly certain the FDA knew. Now, after hundreds of millions of BIG PHARMA doses, they want to admit to a mistake on Ivermectin??? You mean pretend to have morals? What a bunch of crap. Where's the admittance on the ineffective and dangerous jab-poison running through the veins of tens of millions of people? These are dangers that they knew about in 2020 and have been hiding, blocking and keeping from us. Maybe I'm just having a bad day, but I call that murder. How about THIS instead? 👇 We SUE the shit out of the corrupted FDA for the jab Emergency Use Authorization when they KNEW Ivermectin was both safe and effective. EUA cannot happen if there are SAFE and EFFECTIVE treatments, PERIOD. So that means, they knowingly lied to us about the safety and effectiveness of Ivermectin (called it horse dewormer) and Hydroxychloroquine so they could get that big pharma authorization approved. Our lives mean nothing! Then the MSM (a corrupted arm of government) PUSHED, MANDATED and SCARED people into injecting poison for PROFIT, knowing in 2020 that the jab was ineffective and dangerous. THEY ARE STILL JABBING!!!! CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY IS BEING TOO KIND.

@DrEtiquette - DR. ETIQUETTE 🤦‍♂️

The FDA openly lied about the benefits of Ivermectin because that was the only way they could get the Covid bio weapon jab approved for emergency use. https://t.co/5hc5NmmYj7

Video Transcript AI Summary
The FDA's website advises against using ivermectin for COVID-19, yet links to clinical trials, half of which indicate it may be effective. For three years, the FDA has warned against ivermectin while referencing studies that support its use. Additionally, there is increasing research suggesting ivermectin could be a vital treatment for COVID-19. The strong opposition from the federal government appears to be linked to the desire to maintain emergency use authorization for COVID vaccines. For more insights, consider subscribing for additional videos.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you actually click on the website that the FDA was linking to in that social media post, you're taken to this page here titled why you should not use ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID 19. And funny enough, that page hyperlinks to a bunch of clinical trials, half of which, if you actually go through them, say that Ivermectin is effective at treating COVID. And I mean, really take that in for a moment. For 3 years now, the FDA has been advising people against Ivermectin while linking to a depository of studies, half of which suggest that Ivermectin is effective. You sometimes cannot make this up. Regardless, even outside of the clinical trials that were linked to by the FDA, there is a growing body of research showing that for 1, Ivermectin is potentially at least an essential treatment for COVID And that secondly, the reason that it was so strongly repelled by the federal government was so that they could maintain their emergency use authorization status for the COVID vaccines. And if you thought that was interesting, well, hit that subscribe button and get more videos just like this.
Saved - December 7, 2024 at 7:30 AM

@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill

Buckle up, Dr, Fauci and Bill Gates…you’re both GOING TO PRISON. The Court has ordered the FDA to produce an additional ONE MILLION PAGES of their Pfizer ‘Covid Vaccine’ documents. https://t.co/V54r5UaDu4

@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill

These CRIMINALS are done 🔥🔥🔥 @MTGrepp

Saved - December 12, 2024 at 7:01 PM

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

Wait until we get to the “the FDA put CIA assets from Wellcome Trust in its Director roles” part to help with the creation, release and coverup of COVID. That’s coming later today.

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Unreal

Saved - December 24, 2024 at 6:34 PM

@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill

FAUCI for PRISON “Fauci knew that Remdesivir would kill you…” “How?” he asked. “Kidney-heart failure…all-organ collapse. You heard it again and again. We've never seen a virus that attacks the kidneys. It wasn't the virus; it was the Remdemsvir…” https://t.co/t3G15DOlwI

Video Transcript AI Summary
To treat viral infections at home, zinc and its enhancers, like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, should be used, as they significantly reduce disease spread. However, the established protocol delayed treatment until hospitalization, where patients received ventilators and remdesivir—both potentially lethal. Remdesivir had previously shown harmful effects in Ebola trials, leading to its discontinuation due to a high rate of severe side effects. Despite this, it became standard care during the pandemic, contributing to kidney failure, heart failure, and organ collapse in patients. Many who died were reported to have kidney failure, which was not caused by the virus but rather by the effects of remdesivir.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You wanna treat them at home. Give them the things that we know kill viral replication. Zinc and anything that enhances zinc, like hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, and a hundred other remedies that we now know dramatically reduce the spread of this disease. And what was our protocol? Our protocol was to do none of that. No treatment until you go to the hospital. Then your treatment are 2 things that are bound to kill you, ventilators and remdesivir. And Tony Fauci knew that remdesivir would kill you. He knew that because in 2019, he tried to put use it for Ebola 2019. He tried to use it to for Ebola, and within 5 days of treatment, it gave lethal side effect to 54% of the people. And the safety monitoring board ordered him to terminate the use of that drug. And he threw a phony, contrived, absolutely fraudulent study that he manipulated and orchestrated. That drug made standard of care. It is homicide. And if you look, how does it kill people? 2 ways, 3 ways, kidney failure, heart failure, and all organ collapse. And what happened to the people who died in the pandemic? What were they dying of? Kidney failure. All the doctors said, you heard it again and again. We've never seen a virus that attacks the kidneys because it wasn't the virus. It was the remdesivir.
Saved - January 21, 2025 at 3:49 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discovered that Joe Biden pardoned Anthony Fauci only back in 2014, which means we can still hold him accountable. Fauci, along with the WHO and NIH, is accused of knowingly distributing harmful drugs. He’s labeled as one of the worst criminals guilty of genocide in what I see as a massive scandal in history.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Look what I found, Joe Biden only pardoned Anthony Fauci back until 2014. We can still get him Anthony Fauci, The World Health Organization and The National Institute of Health are accused of KNOWINGLY giving out killer drugs Anthony Fauci is directly named, “The worst order criminals guilty of genocide” “We're talking about probably the most horrible scandal and scam ever perpetrated, not only in the name of science, but in humanity and in all history.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
This discussion centers on a significant scandal involving the manipulation of science and humanity, specifically criticizing the actions of the National Institutes of Health and figures like Gallo, Fauci, Hazeltine, and Essex. It claims these individuals are guilty of severe wrongdoing, likening their actions to genocide. There is a challenge for these individuals and Burroughs Welcome to take legal action against the speaker, who accuses them of knowingly distributing harmful drugs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're talking about probably the most horrible scandal and scam ever perpetrated not only in the name of science, but in humanity and in all history. The great lie of Hitler. It's amazing. I think he would envy the job being done by members of the National Institutes of Health and even the media, especially in this country. And I will put the lie to the individuals of the NIH, particularly Gallo and Fauci and Hazeltine and Essex and the rest of these scoundrels of the worst order. Criminals guilty of genocide, without a doubt. I invite them to take me to court. I wish Burroughs Welcome would take me to court because they have been putting out a killer drug knowingly.
Saved - February 24, 2025 at 1:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe that people have died and suffered serious injuries due to these vaccines, and those responsible should be held accountable. The science behind the public broadcasts seems to prioritize pharmaceutical interests over public health. Lives are at stake.

@GTIATJohn316 - Kat Has Had Enough

People died and were seriously injured by these vaccines based on these representations. They should all have to answer for what the 'science' was that they based the public broadcast on. This was not done in the public interest. It was done to further the interest of their pharmaceutical advertisers. People have died. @POTUS @DOGE @BrendanCarrFCC

Saved - April 2, 2025 at 5:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Richard M. Fleming has revealed alarming information about SARS-CoV-2, confirming that HIV sequences were inserted into its spike protein, a process that could not have occurred naturally. This spike protein, patented by the U.S. government, is linked to a rise in turbo cancers, suggesting a deliberate attack on public health rather than mere incompetence. Key agencies and figures, including Tony Fauci, are implicated in what is described as biotech warfare against humanity, raising serious questions about the intentions behind these actions and the timeline of their planning.

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

🚨 GENOCIDE IN REAL TIME? 🚨 Dr. Richard M. Fleming (PhD, MD, JD) just confirmed what many feared: 🧬 HIV sequences were inserted into the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2. This couldn’t have happened naturally. This wasn’t an accident. 👉 The PRRA insert — essential for human infection — was patented. And guess who owns the rights? The U.S. government. Yes, the same spike that was pushed globally… The same spike that destroys your immune system’s ability to fight cancer — is now linked to the explosion of turbo cancers worldwide. 🧪 NIH. 💼 DOD. 🧬 NIAID. 💉 FDA. 🛑 DHHS. All under the Biden regime. All implicated. And at the center? Tony Fauci — the man who “led” the response. This wasn’t public health. It was biotech warfare against humanity. 💣 You’re not looking at incompetence. You’re looking at deliberate depopulation. Not a bug. A feature. Billions injected. Immune systems dismantled. Cancers ignited. Lives shortened — by design. The question is no longer “Was this engineered?” It’s “How long have they been planning it?” 📢 The mask is off. The agenda is exposed. And the world deserves answers. @Doctor_I_am_The

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims HIV exists in the spike protein, citing Luc Montagnier, who won a Nobel Prize for identifying HIV. Montagnier identified 18 RNA fragments matching HIV and SIV. The speaker questions how the PRRA insert, requiring 12 nucleotides, could be a mutation, and points to a larger HIV insert of 1,770 nucleotide bases. The speaker details the four steps required for the virus to enter the body: ACE2 receptor, TMPRSS2, furin cleavage site (PRRA), and neuropilin NRP1. They claim black people are more infected because they have more TMPRSS2 receptors. The speaker notes only SARS CoV-2 has the PRRA insert, and the NIH owns the patent for the insertion of enzymes related to the furin cleavage site, useful for HIV glycoprotein and tumor progression. Animal studies in humanized mice showed 95% died after two weeks, exhibiting spongiform encephalopathy (mad cow disease). Rhesus macaque monkeys developed inflammatory cells and Lewy bodies (Alzheimer's) in their brains, suggesting the spike protein crosses the blood-brain barrier. The speaker claims Kevin W. McCarran has warned of these neurological effects. The speaker alleges the U.S. government, through various agencies and individuals, is responsible for the virus's creation at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and that it was intentionally released in the wet market.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This looks awfully complex, doesn't it? And if it does, that's good because every one of these red arrows shows HIV in the spike protein. This work comes from Luc Montagnier. Doctor. Montagnier is the premier virologist in Paris, France. Doctor. Montagnier got the Nobel Prize for identifying HIV. So if there's anybody on planet earth who ought to be able to tell you that HIV exists in this spike protein, that's the man. And oh look, where he used to be professor and chair at, that's been deleted from the Internet as well. That's the same place that Zheng Li presented and now got wiped off the face of the Internet and off the face of the planet. Doctor. Montney identified 18 RNA fragments that match HIV and SIV. This is SIMMUN or monkey grade eight immune deficiency virus. If you look at it, remember I told you about PRRA? That's four amino acids and every amino acid requires three nucleotides. That's 12, right? 12 nucleotides. Mutations occur one nucleotide at a time, not 12. Okay? That's an insert. If you think that's bad, look at the HIV insert. 590 amino acids are 1,770 nucleotide bases that match HIV one. Now understanding that mutations occur one nucleotide at a time, scientifically I'd like somebody to justify to me how that's possibly a mutation. That doesn't happen. This is the man who defines it. Every one of these red arrows and every one of these are the nucleotides that match HIV. That's why there's so much up there. It's like the funding. It's not one. It's not just a little. It's a lot. So we get the HIV, the PRA insert that we're gonna talk about. This is if you know so the spike protein is actually made up of S1 and S2. Spiked protein part one, spiked protein part two. And this is how it lays out. Now you've heard of the ACE2 receptor, cookies top shelf. Okay? It takes four receptors for this virus to get into you. Step one, ACE two receptor. Right here. Step two, TMPRSS2 transmembrane protein series two. You wanna know why black people get more infected than non black people? It's because they have more TMPRSS2 receptors in their nose. Okay? That's right here. Third step, the furan cleavage site. That's PRRA, furan cleavage site. Okay? That is right here. And step four is neuropilin NRP one, neuropilin one, which helps it get into the brain. Okay? Now we're gonna go back and concentrate just on the PRRA right here. This part, s one, is where that's at. That's the stable part. Every mutation showing up shows up on this part, the unstable part. So this PRRA insert is in the stable part of the spike protein and we know that oops. I did a little bit better for you. There's the the sequence. The furin cleavage site is right down here. Remember I said 12 nucleotides? There they are that make these four amino acids. Okay? And if we go over here, these are all the known coronaviruses. And you've heard about pangolin and all the others. They're listed up here. Only SARS CoV two has this PRA. This is the genetic number, the the nucleotide number, so we know exactly where that insert is. They did a great job at designing this, but when you have science on your side, can find where these things are and find the exact numbers and compare them. That's what Montagnier did for the HIV stuff. He also showed the PRA and rest of the spike protein is, you know, everybody sequences that. We know it's there. It's critical. And this paper shows it's critical. PRA is essential to infecting human cells. It's the furin cleavage site. And guess who owns the patent for the insertion of the enzymes related to the furin cleavage site? That's insertion of it? It's us, NIH, the US government. And it owns it because it paid for it. And what's it useful for? It's useful for HIV to glycoprotein one twenty and tumor progression because this virus also shuts down the p 53 system, which we're not gonna really talk about except the p 53 system protects you from cancer and this virus helps shut it down. Insertions. So we've got HIV glycoprotein one twenty and PRAA two, PRAA. And as a result of that, it causes this prion like domain. We got to that part. Right? Now we're supposed to do animal research before we do people research so that we can find out what's really going on before exposing all of you, the upper animals. Right? Okay. Well, here's what we know from animal studies. In humanized mice, so that was mice that we gave ACE two receptors to so we could work with them on this. After two weeks, ninety five percent of the animals were dead. When we looked at those animals, we saw this under the microscope. This kinda looks like a sponge. Right? This is what it's supposed to look like, all this. But this is what happens and this looks like a sponge and it's in the brain. So in medicine and science, we call that spongiform encephalopathy. Okay? And the general public calls this mad cow disease. We also know in rhesus macaque monkeys because those are the closest thing to us to use as a model to see what will happen to us, that in five to six weeks when the animals were sacrificed, this part of their brain was infected with the spike protein. And when we looked at their brains, we saw inflammatory cells and we saw Lewy bodies. That's Alzheimer's disease and other neurologic diseases. These animals didn't have this before they were exposed. This is the result of the spike protein crossing the blood brain barrier, which is exquisitely good at and getting to its target. There's a doctor, a PhD by the name of Kevin W. McCarran in Japan, who's done more research. He is probably the world's expert on animal models, on primate models and these diseases. And for a year, doctor McCarron has been warning the world that this is going to have that this spike protein crosses the blood brain barrier and will have damaging neurologic effects like it did on the monkeys. He's done animal models showing what happens when you damage this part of the brain and his animal models match exactly this type of damage with neurologic disease. There are scientists around the world trying to address this problem and bring home the information that you need. All of this has been brought to you by the U. S. Federal Government, the FDA, NIAID, Health and Human Services, the Department of Defense and the National Institutes of Health through Fauci, to Dezac, to Barrick, to Shangli to produce this. That's the Wuhan Institute of Virology. You don't put a level four virology lab in the center of a city. We put things like that way out away from you because there's gonna be a leak at some point in time and the last thing you want is for it to leak out. Really, let's be honest, the last thing you want is for you to figure out that we get leaked out. Okay? It's CYA. Right? But the but the good part, the altruistic part is we don't want to harm people. Right? So you kind of hope that there's a balance in there. Why would you put this monstrosity in the center of a city? Now Doctor. Yan that I'm hoping to share and Skype with you a little bit later because part of the work we're doing upfront was to connect with Doctor. Yan who escaped from Hong Kong has done interviews with me where she has pointed out that if and you've all heard about this, the wet market, that this bioweapon was intentionally taken and released in the wet market to see what it would do. Research.
Saved - November 11, 2025 at 7:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I observe a recurring claim that mainstream opposition is fake, a puppet show for the Elitarian rulers who seek total control. Across posts, I’m told both sides push the same agenda—AI governance, surveillance, vaccines, war—while real issues like Epstein, CDC, and media are hidden. The message: beware the illusion of choice; power remains centralized.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian Masters. As such they keep on fooling the ...: https://tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=The%20Parasitic%20System%202023-12-13:%20Lets%20Deflate%20the%20Parasitic%20System!&relationship=All&drsid=0&pisid=0&page=1#tm_fakeopp

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tumia March 2024 explains that deflation is needed because of fake controlled opposition—illusory puppets pretending to oppose the illiterion puppets on the other side, but in fact both sides advancing the same agenda of totalitarian control for their illiterion masters. This structure fooling the people hides the most important truths and pushes the totalitarian control agenda of their illiterion masters. The argument continues that without deflating this parasitic system, fake, controlled opposition will always be bribed and/or blackmailed to effectively keep control of the narrative and the people’s perception. In large-scale systems, there is no real democratic choice and there never will be. The proposed solution is: “Let’s deflate the parasitic system.” David Ick is cited: “Trump doubles down on support for COVID fake vaccines and boosters despite outcry from conservatives.” The speaker asks, “Are you getting it yet Trump supporters?” and contends, “He was a fraud all along as I have said since 2016 and he has been leading you to glorious failure for the masters that own him.” The assertion is that no politician will get us out of this, and “We have to do it.” Catherine Austin Fitz is referenced: “Trump put $10 billion dollars into a program to depopulate The US.” The message ends with an instruction to “Please like and follow,” and provides the source: tumia.org.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tumia March 2024. Why deflate? Because of fake controlled opposition. Fake opposition, illiterion puppets pretending to oppose the illiterion puppets on the other side, but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of totalitarian control and for their controlling illiterion masters. As such, they keep on fooling the people, hiding the most important truths and advance more and more the totalitarian control agenda of their illiterion masters. Why deflate? Otherwise, fake, controlled opposition will always be bribed and or blackmailed to effectively keep control of the narrative, the people's perception. So in these large scale systems, there is no real democratic choice and there never will be. What's the solution then? Let's deflate the parasitic system. David Ick, Trump doubles down on support for COVID fake vaccines and boosters despite outcry from conservatives. Are you getting it yet Trump supporters? He was a fraud all along as I have said since 2016 and he has been leading you to glorious failure for the masters that own him. No politician is going to get us out of this. We have to do it. Catherine Austin Fitz, Trump put $10 billion dollars into a program to depopulate The US. Please like and follow. Source, tumia.org.
the parasitic system 2023-12-13: lets deflate the parasitic system! @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 the parasitic system 2023-12-13: lets deflate the parasitic system! @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 tumia.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

If I extrapolate my estimate for 2022 to 2023 and 2024 I get in total 41milj excess deaths since the covid gentech "vax" rollout. Adding the 9milj from the covid killing protocols in 2020 gives a total of 50milj excess deaths (for 5 yrs). By country(47): https://tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=Covid%20World%202022-10-09:%203%20Years%20of%20Cov-Vaccine%20Bioweapons:%20Estimated%20Extra%20Deaths%2031M-Adv.%20Eff.%201.9B&relationship=All&drsid=0&pisid=0&page=1

Video Transcript AI Summary
The article COVID world 10/09/2022 presents estimates of extra deaths and serious adverse effects attributable to a three-year period of SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bioweapons. The 10/09/2022 estimates report thirty-one million extra deaths and one point nine billion serious adverse effects over three years. Two main differences with the previous estimates (10/01/2022) are: first, eleven countries, for about 600,000,000 people, were added to the estimate base data, making the current estimate base data consist of 47 countries for about 2,300,000,000 people; second, for estimating serious adverse effects the extra deaths of 2021 and 2022 are taken fully into account as input instead of half in the previous estimates. The extra deaths estimates for 2020, 2021, and 2022 are based on officially reported and factual deaths in the countries listed in the table, with sources from Our World in Data (appendix references). Extra deaths (ED for 2020, ED21 for 2021, and ED22 for 2022) are calculated as the difference between the factual total deaths in the concerned year. Missing months of the incomplete 2022 year are estimated by extrapolating the monthly average of all known months from January 2021 onward. The yearly evolution uses a corrected average of the five preceding years (2015 to 2019). The yearly correction factor is 0.75%, calculated from the evolution of the sum of deaths of all countries from 2015 to 2019. For 2020 ED the correction factor 0.75% was applied three times (reference year 2017) to the five-year average; for 2021 ED, four times; for 2022 ED, five times. The extra deaths estimates thus reflect excess deaths after correcting for expected yearly evolution and expected yearly without the mass vaccination and COVID bioweapons. To compute the world totals: for 2020 ED, the ED100 ks extra deaths per 100k people by country are calculated and aggregated to 112 extra deaths per 100k people, applied to the world population to yield nine million extra deaths in 2020, the first year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. For 2021 ED, the ED21M doses (extra deaths per million doses) are calculated and aggregated to 961 extra deaths per million doses, applied to global doses to yield twelve point one million extra deaths in 2021, the first year with the vaccine bioweapon and second year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. For 2022 ED, the ED22M doses (extra deaths per million doses) are calculated and aggregated to 763 extra deaths per million doses, applied to global doses to yield nine point six million extra deaths in 2022, the second year with the vaccine bioweapon and third year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. The estimate for people with serious adverse effects is calculated by multiplying the estimated extra deaths in 2021 and 2022 by an estimated ratio of reported adverse effects to reported deaths after COVID vaccination, which is 87.6, derived from a table of estimated probabilities after COVID vaccination for all ages. This results in an estimated one point one billion serious adverse effects for 2021 and zero point eight billion for 2022. Considering the estimated thirty-one million extra deaths and estimated one point nine billion serious adverse effects for three years, the text asserts that terms such as bioweaponized, propagandized, lured, coerced and mandated depopulation and genocide should not be taboo. It further posits about ten million extra deaths yearly worldwide since 2020, projecting one hundred ten million extra deaths by the end of 2030 if these trends continue. The text acknowledges that if data are far off target or data are faulty, the current estimates and trends could be seriously unvalidated. It attributes censorship and a lack of truthful science in mainstream media and tech platforms to propounding that SARS CoV-two is naturally evolved, while claiming truthful science proves SARS CoV-two is designed and made by humans in a biolab. It asserts that the genetic code of SARS CoV-two contains lab-made inserts (PRRA, HIVGP120) that are too large and too numerous, and that these inserts only appear in other natural viruses that are genetically distant. It references a substantial trail of documents and testimonies before and after the release of SARS CoV-two about these genetic codes and the needed biochemical technology, including financing, scientific documents, and patents. Specific sources and figures are noted, including Doctor Richard Fleming, MD, sworn testimony that COVID-19 is a bioweapon; Doctor Fleming on Montanier's discovery of HIV and spiked protein; Veritas Revelation Project materials; and claims that the virus comes from a lab. It also mentions Genentech COVID vaccines causing human cells to produce large amounts of toxic spike protein in multiple organs and tissues, and asserts these vaccines are bioweapons with additional components and contaminations causing health damage. The article is attributed to Pak Osmol, dated 10/09/2022, with Appendix A citing Our World in Data Excess Mortality Raw Death Count as the data source.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: COVID world 10/09/2022, estimated extra deaths thirty one million and estimated serious adverse effects one point nine billion for three years of SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bioweapons. The two main differences with the previous estimates on 10/01/2022 are the following: First, 11 countries, for about 600,000,000 people, were added to the estimate base data. As such, the current estimate base data consists of 47 countries for about 2,300,000,000 people. This makes the current estimates more representative for the whole world. Second, for estimating the serious adverse effects the extra deaths of 2021 and 2022 are taken fully into account as input instead of half in the previous estimates. The extra deaths estimates for 2020, 2021, and 2022 are based on officially reported and factual deaths in the countries mentioned in the table below. For the source of all the used data see the Our World and Data links in the appendix. Extra deaths (see columns twenty twenty ED, twenty twenty one ED, and twenty twenty two ED in the table below) are calculated as the difference of the factual number of total deaths in the concerned year. The missing months of the incomplete 2022 year are estimated by extrapolation of the monthly average of all known months from January 2021 on. The for yearly evolution corrected average of the five preceding years 2015 to 2019. The yearly correction factor used is 0.75% and was calculated based on the evolution of the sum of deaths of all countries below in 2015 to 2019. For the 2020 ED estimate the correction factor 0.75 was three times (reference year twenty seventeen) applied on the five year average, for 2021 ED four times and for 2022 ED five times. In other words, the extra deaths estimates are in fact the excess deaths after correction for an expected yearly evolution and expected yearly without the mass vaccination and COVID bioweapons. Then to calculate the 2020 ED estimate for the world, first the column ED100 ks extra deaths per 100 ks people of the country is calculated. Then this column is aggregated which results in 112 extra deaths per 100 ks people. The latter value is applied on the world population which results into nine million extra deaths in 2020, the first year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. To calculate the 2021 ED estimate for the world, first the column ED21M doses, extra deaths per million doses given in the country, is calculated. This column is aggregated which results in nine sixty one extra deaths per million doses. The latter value is applied on the world doses which results into twelve point one million extra deaths in 2021, the first year with the vaccine bioweapon and second year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. To calculate the 2022 ED estimate for the world, first the column ED22M doses, extra deaths per million doses given in the country, is calculated. This column is aggregated which results in seven sixty three extra deaths per million doses. The latter value is applied on the world doses which results into nine point six million extra deaths in 2022, the second year with the vaccine bioweapon and third year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. Press CTRL plus four more image detail below. The estimate for people with serious adverse effects is calculated by multiplying the estimated extra deaths in 2021 and 2022 by an estimated ratio reported adverse effectsreported deaths after COVID vaccination. The ratio used is 87.6 and was calculated from the table Estimated probabilities after COVID vaccination for all ages in the article below. This results in an estimated one point one billion serious adverse effects for 2021 and zero point eight billion for 2022. Considering the estimated thirty one million extra deaths and estimated one point nine billion serious adverse effects for three years of deployed SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bioweapons the words bioweaponized, propagandized, lured, coerced and mandated depopulation and genocide should not be taboo. Furthermore, there are about ten million extra deaths yearly worldwide since 2020. If these extra deaths are continued this will result in one hundred and ten million extra deaths by the end of 2030 from these bioweapons since 2020. For the sake of estimating, certain assumptions about the domain were introduced. If one or some of those assumptions would be far off target, for example as more data becomes available and is integrated in the estimation or some data appears faulty, the current estimates and trends could be seriously unvalidated. Because of the mass propaganda, corrupted science, lack of truthful science and censorship in the mainstream media and on tech platforms, thus the elites, many people still think SARS CoV-two is a naturally evolved virus. Truthful science though proves beyond any doubt SARS CoV-two is designed and made by humans in a biolab. After all and first of all, science shows the genetic code of SARS CoV-two contains several lab made inserts, not natural mutations or recombinations of natural viruses. Because these inserted codes PRRA (HIVGP120) are much too large and too many, and because these genetic codes only appear in other natural viruses that are genetically much too different from SARS CoV-two, the probability that SARS CoV-two has naturally mutated or recombined from other natural viruses is quasi zero. Furthermore, there exists a substantial trail of documents and testimonies, years before and after the release of SARS CoV-two about these genetic codes and the existing biochemical technology needed to insert them, financing of the research, scientific documents, patents. See the links below for sources and science. Doctor. Richard M. Fleming, MD, sworn testimony that COVID-nineteen is a bioweapon. Doctor. Richard Fleming on Montanier's discovery of HIV and spiked protein. The virus comes from a lab, appears from the Veritas Revelation Project. Are our scientists lying to us? SARS CoV-two is likely a lab construct. The origin of SARS CoV-two. Since the Genentech COVID vaccines make the human body cells produced during months up to years huge amounts of the toxic spike protein of SARS CoV-two, In fact in all organs and tissues much greater amounts than the average, dominantly only mucosal, infection with SARS CoV-two itself which for the majority of healthy unvaccinated people causes hardly any illness, just cold like symptoms, these Genentech COVID vaccines are of course themselves bioweapons and much worse than the virus itself. Furthermore, not only the produced toxic spike protein but also other components and contaminations of these vaccines are cause of serious health damage. See the links below for information about the devastating effects of the COVID vaccine bioweapons. Images, press CTRL plus for more image detail. The article COVID World 10/09/2022, estimated extra deaths thirty one million and estimated serious adverse effects 1,900,000,000 for three years of SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bioweapons was written by Pak Osmol, 10/09/2022. Appendix A Data Source. Our World in Data Excess Mortality Raw Death Count. Click the Download tab below the graph on the displayed page. Downloaded CSV September 2022 from Our World in Data Excess Mortality Raw Death Count. Right click the link and then Save Link As.
covid world 2022-10-09: 3 years of cov-vaccine bioweapons: estimated extra deaths 31m-adv. eff. 1.9b @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 covid world 2022-10-09: 3 years of cov-vaccine bioweapons: estimated extra deaths 31m-adv. eff. 1.9b @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 tumia.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

If I extrapolate my estimate for 2022 to 2023+half of 2024 I get in total 36mil excess deaths since the covid "vax" rollout. Adding the 9mil from the covid killing protocols in 2020 gives a total of 44mil (4.5 yrs). By country(47): https://rumble.com/v4g1d6o-estimated-31mil-excess-deaths-1.9bil-adverse-effects-for-3-yrs-of-sars-cov-.html https://tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=Covid%20World%202022-10-09:%203%20Years%20of%20Cov-Vaccine%20Bioweapons:%20Estimated%20Extra%20Deaths%2031M-Adv.%20Eff.%201.9B&relationship=All&drsid=0&pisid=0&page=1

Estimated 31mil Excess Deaths+1.9bil Adverse Effects for 3 Yrs of Sars-Cov-2+Vaccine Bioweapons Covid World 2022-10-09: Estimated Extra Deaths 31 Million and Estimated Serious Adverse Effects 1.9 Billion for 3 Years of Covid Killing Protocols, Sars-Cov-2 Virus and Vaccine Bioweapons: https://tum rumble.com
covid world 2022-10-09: 3 years of cov-vaccine bioweapons: estimated extra deaths 31m-adv. eff. 1.9b @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 covid world 2022-10-09: 3 years of cov-vaccine bioweapons: estimated extra deaths 31m-adv. eff. 1.9b @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 tumia.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@SteviesQuotes Nep-oppositie is van alle tijden en geen toeval:

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Nep-oppositie: elitaire marionetten die doen alsof ze zich verzetten tegen de elitaire marionetten aan de andere kant ... . Audio-video versie (Engels): https://rumble.com/v575riz-fake-opposition-elitarian-puppets-pretending-to-oppose.html Geschreven versie (Engels): https://tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=The%20Parasitic%20System%202023-12-13:%20Lets%20Deflate%20the%20Parasitic%20System!&relationship=All&drsid=0&pisid=0&page=1#tm_fakeopp

the parasitic system 2023-12-13: lets deflate the parasitic system! @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 the parasitic system 2023-12-13: lets deflate the parasitic system! @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 tumia.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Nep-oppositie: elitaire marionetten die doen alsof ze zich verzetten tegen de elitaire marionetten aan de andere kant ... . Audio-video versie (Engels): https://rumble.com/v575riz-fake-opposition-elitarian-puppets-pretending-to-oppose.html Geschreven versie (Engels): https://tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=The%20Parasitic%20System%202023-12-13:%20Lets%20Deflate%20the%20Parasitic%20System!&relationship=All&drsid=0&pisid=0&page=1#tm_fakeopp

the parasitic system 2023-12-13: lets deflate the parasitic system! @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 the parasitic system 2023-12-13: lets deflate the parasitic system! @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 tumia.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@TPV_John - The Patriot Voice

It looks like the whole “MAHA” deal was just a clever cover for bringing in total AI governance into healthcare and FDA oversight… What? You thought that MAHA would be the END of mRNA COVID jabs, and a return to a truly healthier America? THINK AGAIN.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@EtienneJansen - Etienne Jansen

@SecKennedy Why are NRNA and MMR biochemical weapons still used today as we speak?!

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

RFK Jr. knows the COVID death jabs constitute mass murder. He’s called them “mass murder” verbatim. He’s now in a position of authority where he can halt them unilaterally, without any action from FDA. He must stop the “mass murder” Trump started.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The attorney (Speaker 0) opens by expressing frustration that pandemic-era liability protections—the PREP Act, the CARE Act, and the 1986 VICA Vaccine Act—grant broad immunity to the actors involved, effectively shielding them from liability and allowing what he calls “mass murder.” He asks Sacha whether there are obvious legal avenues to sue Pfizer and obtain redress for what he views as illegal acts, given this shield of immunity. Sacha (Speaker 1) replies that neither he nor his colleagues discourage attempts to sue Pfizer due to the fraud allegations they’ve identified. He notes, however, that nobody knows exactly what will break through the immunity barrier, so they should try different approaches. He outlines the current landscape: the defense Pfizer will likely raise is that they did not defraud the government, but merely delivered fraud that the government ordered. He references a concrete example in Brooke Jackson’s case, where Pfizer filed a motion to dismiss in April, arguing the fraud claim centered on delivering government-ordered fraud rather than perpetrating it independently. Sacha emphasizes that while the case may be dismissed, it has not been yet. If a future dismissal occurs, the admission would be valuable, and the goal is to elicit admissions in court. He suggests that they need to prove, by any admissible method, that there was explicit U.S. government policy to commit mass murder and genocide, or that certain individuals—Robert Kodlek, Peter Marks, Fauci, and others—were rogue actors acting outside their authority. In other words, the objective is to obtain explicit statements or admissions that could substantiate claims of government-directed action or unauthorized conduct by specific individuals, to challenge the immunity and pursue redress.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. Well, I'm gonna let you go, Sacha. But before I do, I'm an attorney. I try to figure out ways to sue people like this. And, you know, the one of the frustrating things during this pandemic is that the PREP Act, the CARE Act, and the 1986 VICA Vaccine Act have all bestowed broad immunity from liability under all of these actors. So they're getting away literally with murder, with AM, with mass murder. They're getting away with it because they have been given this bubble of this shield of immunity from liability. You have an expertise in corporate liability. As a corporate liability officer, do you see any obvious ways where somebody like me can file a lawsuit and get redressed for some of these, illegal acts? Speaker 1: Yeah. So, first of all, neither me nor my colleagues, discourage anyone from doing just that, to just going after Pfizer because of all the fraud that they have committed. I think what the the problem is we're all having, we don't know exactly what's going to crack that that wall, but we have to attempt different ways. Now the yes, we can try going after Pfizer. I'm just saying, you know, here's the lay of the land. This is the the defense they're going to invoke. They already invoked it in Brooke Jackson's case. They're saying we did not defraud the government. We delivered the fraud that the government ordered. And that's a even Speaker 0: Which gay oh, in Brooke Jackson. Speaker 1: In Brooke Jackson's in April, they filed motion to dismiss. So and while, you know, the case may be dismissed it hasn't been dismissed. But in let's say in the future, it gets dismissed because because of this. That admission alone is priceless, and we need to elicit these admissions in court. They need to tell us ultimately ultimately through whatever method we're going to to go after. Ultimately, they they need to tell us it's an explicit US government policy to commit mass murder and genocide, or these were rogue actors, these people, Robert Kodlek, Peter Marx, you know, Fauci, whoever. You know, these specific individuals, they were rogue actors and acting outside of their authority. Speaker 0: So

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

RFK Jr. knows the COVID death jabs constitute mass murder. He’s called them “mass murder” verbatim. He’s now in a position of authority where he can halt them unilaterally, without any action from FDA. He must stop the “mass murder” Trump started.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@MODUSCUNTO - MR. NICE GUY (really trying) - d0xC

@AdameMedia

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@TPV_John - The Patriot Voice

This is a MASSIVE DISTRACTION from the fact that Trump is getting absolutely GRILLED on all sides for teaming up with Palantir to create a database of all Americans. What better way to attempt to get people to stop talking about that, than to share something absolutely fringe and outlandish on his official Truth Social account. People will now forget about the digital prison being constructed for them, chasing mindless rabbit holes about Biden. See how easy that was?

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@HighImpactFlix - HighImpactFlix

NEW VIDEO: Trump just handed TOTAL CONTROL over EVERY AMERICAN to a private company.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@DrLoupis__ - Dr. Anastasia Maria Loupis

What's going on?

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake opposition of fo actually cooperate to create real sources for division+hate between people. Fe open borders for mass immigration, war, ... . Lets deflate their system and handle those real sources with care+love. See parent tweet video+its replies.

@NightwatchN8 - Nightwatch N8

The two party illusion is the biggest time-waster on the planet

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake opposition of fo actually cooperate to create real sources for division+hate between people. Fe open borders for mass immigration, war, ... . Lets deflate their system and handle those real sources with care+love. See parent tweet video+its replies.

@deSunShineBand - CS

Markeer dit. Bewaar dit. Onthoud dit. Kijk er vaak naar. Leer het. Begrijp het. Pak het vast. Geloof het. En vergeet het nooit. Nooit. Dit is de waarheid. De waarheid die voor je verborgen wordt gehouden. De MSM willen nooit dat je de waarheid weet. Ze willen oorlog. En de dood.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that this is not an attack by Putin on Ukraine in the way it is commonly framed. The speaker references 1990, stating that on 02/09/1990 James Baker III told Mikhail Gorbachev that NATO would not move eastward if Germany unified, and that Gorbachev agreed, ending World War II. The speaker asserts that the US then cheated starting in 1994 when Clinton signed off on a plan to expand NATO all the way to Ukraine, marking the rise of the neocons and identifying Clinton as the first agent of this. NATO expansion began in 1999 with Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic, at which point Russia did not see a direct threat. The speaker notes the US-led bombing of Serbia in 1999 as problematic, describing it as NATO bombing Belgrade for seventy-eight straight days to break the country apart, which Russia did not like. Putin became president, and the Russians initially tolerated and complained but were largely subdued. The speaker claims Putin started out pro-European and pro-American, even suggesting joining NATO when there was some mutual respect. After 9/11 and the Afghan conflict, Russia supported the effort to root out terror. Two decisive actions are highlighted: in 2002, the United States unilaterally withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, described as perhaps the most decisive event rarely discussed in this context. This led to the US placing missile systems in Eastern Europe, which Russia views as a direct threat. The speaker mentions a soft regime change operation in Ukraine in 2004-2005, followed by Yanukovych winning the election in 2009 and becoming president in 2010 on the basis of neutrality for Ukraine. This calmed tensions because the US was pushing NATO, while Ukrainian public opinion reportedly did not want NATO membership, citing a divided country between ethnic Ukrainians and ethnic Russians and a desire to stay away from certain conflicts. In 02/22/2014, the United States allegedly participated in the overthrow of Yanukovych, described as a typical US regime change operation. The Russians supposedly intercepted a call between Victoria Nuland (then at the State Department, now at Columbia University) and Jeffrey Piot, the US ambassador to Ukraine, discussing who would be in the next government. The speaker asserts that after these events, the US said NATO would enlarge, while Putin repeatedly warned to stop, noting that promises were made not to enlarge NATO. Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia are listed as having joined NATO in 2004, before the broader enlargement. The speaker accuses the US of rejecting the basic idea of not expanding NATO to Russia’s border while placing missile systems after breaking a treaty, including walking out of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty in 2019. On 12/15/2021, Putin allegedly proposed a draft Russia-US security agreement with no NATO enlargement, which the speaker says he communicated to the White House, urging negotiations to avoid war. The speaker claims Jake Sullivan asserted an open-door policy for NATO enlargement, calling it “bullshit,” and asserts that they refused negotiations, leading to the special military operation, with Zelensky offering neutrality and Western leaders pushing Ukraine to fight, resulting in “600,000 deaths now of Ukrainians.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is not an attack by Putin on Ukraine in the way that we are told every day. This started in 1990. 02/09/1990, James Baker the third, our secretary of state, said to Mikhail Gorbachev, NATO will not move one inch eastward if you agree to German unification, basically ending World War two. And, Gorbachev said that's very important. Yes. NATO doesn't move, and we agree to German unification. The US then cheated on this already starting in 1994 when Clinton signed off on a, basically, a plan to expand NATO all the way to Ukraine. This is when the so called neocons took power, and, Clinton was the first agent of this. And the expansion of NATO started in 1999 with Poland, Hungary, and Czech Republic. At that point, Russia didn't much care. There was no border other than with the Konigsberg, but other than that, there was no direct threat. Then, The US, led the bombing of Serbia in 1999. That was bad, by the way, because that was a use of NATO to bomb a European capital, Belgrade, seventy eight straight days to break the country apart. The Russians didn't like that very much. But Putin became president. They swallowed it. They complained. But, even Putin started out pro European, pro American actually asked, maybe we should join NATO when there was still the idea of some kind of mutually respectful relationship. Then nine eleven came, then came Afghanistan, and the Russians said, yeah, we'll support you. We understand to root out terror. But then came two other decisive actions. In 2002, The United States unilaterally walked out of the anti ballistic missile treaty. This was probably the most decisive event never discussed in this context, But what it did was trigger The US putting in missile systems in Eastern Europe that Russia views as a dire direct threat. In 02/1945, we engaged in a soft regime change operation in Ukraine. But in 2009, Yanukovych won the election, and he became president in 2010 on the basis of neutrality for Ukraine. That calmed things down because The US was pushing NATO, but the people of Ukraine on the opinion polls didn't even wanna be a NATO. They knew that the country is divided between ethnic Ukrainian, ethnic Russian. What do we want with this? We wanna stay away from your problems. So in 02/22/2014, The United States participated actively in the overthrow of Yanukovych, A typical US regime change operation, have no doubt about it. And the Russians did us a favor. They intercepted a really ugly call between Victoria Nuland, my colleague at Columbia University now, between her and, The US ambassador to Ukraine, Jeffrey Piot, who's a senior state department official till today, and they talked about regime change. They said, who's gonna be the next government? All of this is to say, The US then said, okay. Now NATO's really gonna enlarge, and Putin kept saying, stop. You promised no NATO enlargement. It's been, by the way, I forgot to mention in 2004, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovia, Slovakia, Slovenia, seven more countries in the not one inch eastward. And then okay. It's a long story, but The US kept rejecting the basic idea, don't expand NATO to Russia's border in a context where we're putting in goddamn missile systems after breaking a treaty. 2019, we walked out of the intermediate nuclear force treaty. On 12/15/2021, Putin put on the table a draft Russia US security agreement. You can find it online. The basis of it is no NATO enlargement. I called the White House that next week after that, begging them, take the negotiations. Putin's offered something. Avoid this war. Oh, Jeff, there's not gonna be a war. Announce that NATO's not gonna enlarge. Oh, don't worry. NATO's not gonna enlarge. I said, oh, you're gonna have a war over something that's not gonna happen? Why don't you announce them? He said, no. No. Our policy is an open door. This is Jake Sullivan. Our policy is an open door policy. Open door for NATO enlargement. That is under the category of bullshit, by the way. You don't have your right to put your military bases anywhere you want and expect peace in this world. They turned down the negotiations, then the special military operation started, and five days later, Zelensky says, okay. Okay. Neutrality. And then The United States and Britain said, no way. You guys fight on. We got your back. We don't have your front. You're all gonna die. But we got your back as we kept pushing them into the front lines. That's 600,000 deaths now of Ukrainians since Boris Johnson flew to Kyiv to tell them to be brave.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake opposition of fo actually cooperate to create real sources for division+hate between people. Fe open borders for mass immigration, war,.. . Lets not take their trap solution+handle those real sources with care+love. See parent tweet video+its replies.

@Spiro_Ghost - Spiro

To those calling for the military to be deployed to LA... That is EXACTLY what the ones pulling the strings want! Problem - Reaction - Solution... Don't fall for it!

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@RealDrJaneRuby - DR JANE RUBY™️

🚨‼️🚨BREAKING: THIS FILTHY LYING MURDERER KENNEDY'S FDA JUST APPROVED Merck’s RSV Shot for NEWBORNS -- 12% Of The Newborns Suffered Serious Adverse Events, Including DEATH Let me explain for those unfamiliar with pharmaceutical drug development. A Rate Of >2% SAEs Greater Than Placebo IS A NO GO!!!!! The rate of newborn death from RSV, is listed as 1/28. The SAE/Death rate from this shot is 1/11. Newborns are TWICE as likely to die from the shot as the infection. Results posted at http://ClinicalTrials.gov included serious neurological adverse reactions! Those of you listed here continue to suck his up to Kennedy's butt while he is murdering children FFS!! The murder of American babies must end now!!! @ChildrensHD @MdBreathe @RWMaloneMD @BusyDrT @DrMakaryFDA @SecKennedy @BretWeinstein @maryhollandnyc

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@RealDrJaneRuby - DR JANE RUBY™️

How can @RWMaloneMD vote objectively on vaccine recommendations at @US_FDA when he owns patents and other business interests in vaccines, especially mRNA injections? @wapo @washingtonpost @SecKennedy @NicoleShanahan @realDonaldTrump

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@RealDrJaneRuby - DR JANE RUBY™️

Let's see how this tweet ages... June 18, 2025: I predict the new Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices ACIP that was recently appointed by @SecKennedy to review vaccines WILL RECOMMEND (aka approve) the Self-Amplifying mRNA shots 👀

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@RealDrJaneRuby - DR JANE RUBY™️

🚨 ALERT: @SenRandPaul's COVID CRIME AMNESTY AND APOLOGY TOUR HAS BEGUN Like all 535 members, Sen Paul is a walking pus filled corrupted piece of self-enriching traitorous scum who is re-installed over and over by the machine.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@RealDrJaneRuby - DR JANE RUBY™️

BREAKING: Kennedy’s ACIP vaccine advisory concluded the meeting today with, "mRNA vaccines ARE SAFE" If you don't see the real problem, we'll never find the real solution

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@ricwe123 - Richard

The CIA Director smirks and exhales like a man watching his plan fall perfectly into place as Trump rolls out yet another round of weapons for Ukraine. John Ratcliffe’s face says it all,this was the plan all along. The Deep State hasn’t lost an ounce of control, and Trump is just another puppet parroting their agenda. Exactly the kind of predictable move Putin saw coming a mile away.....

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states that there are plans to send more weapons to Ukraine, confirming that the country will receive additional arms. The speaker emphasizes that this action is necessary: “We have to. They they have to be able to defend themselves.” The speaker asserts that Ukraine is being attacked and hit hard, describing the situation with repetition to underscore the intensity: “They're getting hit very hard now,” followed by “They're getting hit very hard.” The speaker reiterates the need for further weapon deliveries, saying, “We're gonna have to send more weapons.” The emphasis is on defensive capabilities, with a clear indication that the weapons being sent are primarily defensive in nature: “Your defensive weapons primarily.” Throughout, the message conveys that the defense of Ukraine requires continued and increased military support in the form of weapons, due to the heavy blows Ukraine is sustaining.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you planning to send more weapons to Ukraine? We're gonna send some more weapons. We have to. They they have to be able to defend themselves. They're getting hit very hard now. They're getting hit very hard. We're gonna have to send more weapons. Your defensive weapons primarily, but they're getting hit very, very hard.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@OwenShroyer1776 - Owen Shroyer

Political Bizarro World

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker describes a perceived flip in the political dynamic around the Epstein files, calling the current moment “political bizarro world.” They observe that on the right, voices now say to move on from the Epstein files, treating it as no big deal, while on the left, voices push for releasing and declassifying the files, with Democrats even attempting to force a floor vote. The speaker notes that during the Trump era, Epstein was a campaign issue, with Trump and several administration members stressing the importance and urgency of releasing the files, and even FBI director Cash Patel reportedly saying it should be the number-one priority. The speaker claims that a majority of Trump voters would have supported releasing the Epstein files on day one, and asserts that this topic was once central to Trump’s political base. In contrast, they point out that in the present moment, the right is urging no action and the left is demanding action, highlighting a stark reversal in public and media positions. Media coverage is described as contradictory to the past: the speaker says CNN and MSNBC are now treating the Epstein files as their biggest story, with Democrats actively calling for declassification and release. They cite Democrats writing songs and posting on social media to advocate for release, suggesting an active and vocal push from the left. A year earlier, the speaker contends, the situation was reversed: right-wing figures demanded the Epstein files, Republican Trump-era officials supported it, and Democrats were largely silent or dismissed the issue as conspiracy theory for involving Bill Clinton. Now, the speaker argues, Democrats are pursuing release while Trump-related figures and right-wing elements retort with resistance or minimal engagement. The speaker uses the juxtaposition to argue that politicians, down to voters, appear highly controlled and capable of swiftly switching sides on the Epstein issue, illustrating broader impressions of partisan manipulation. They suggest broader themes such as “no new wars,” “no new foreign entanglements,” and “no new strikes” as possible contexts for the shifting narratives, alongside reactions to Iran-related actions and Middle East involvement, though they acknowledge these as speculative links. Ultimately, the speaker emphasizes how drastic the shift around the Epstein files feels, labeling it the most political bizarro-world moment and, in their view, a return to “clown world”—now in an inverted, bizarro form.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. We are now officially in political bizarro world. Now I was gonna post on x about this, but I started to type it out and I realized this is so weird. I can't even really put it into text. So I'll just go ahead and shoot a short video. We are in political bizarro world. What am I talking about? You now have the right wing saying to move on from the Epstein files. Nothing to see here. Forget about it. No big deal. And you have the left wing now talking about the Epstein files, demanding their release, even Democrats trying to take it to a vote on the floor of the house to get them declassified. What? On the campaign, Trump talked about the Epstein files multiple times and releasing them. Multiple members of his administration talked about the importance, the utmost importance of the Epstein files and releasing them. Some, including FBI director Cash Patel, said it should be the number one priority, demanded it be done day one. I would say the majority of Trump voters would have said, yes. Epstein files day one. It was literally a campaign issue. And now a lot of these voices in the Trump world on the right wing are saying move on. Nothing to see here. Meanwhile, I tune in to CNN last night. I tune in to MSNBC last night. And what is their biggest story? The Epstein files. And they're demanding the Epstein files. I've got democrats writing songs and posting them on their social media demanding the Epstein files be released. What? What is going on? A year ago, it was the exact opposite. A year ago, it was right wingers demanding the Epstein files, writing songs, all this stuff, Republicans, Trump now administration members, and the Democrats were silent. Or they would call it a conspiracy theorist because he talked about Bill Clinton on the list. Now you have the Democrats in a full forced effort to try to get the files released, and it's the Trump administration and the right wing stopping it and saying nothing to see here. What in the world? And you know what it really shows? It shows how controlled both sides are from from the politicians all the way down to the constituents, to the voters, to the people. It shows how everything is controlled, that just like that, all of a sudden, people just change sides. So we went from the right being give us the Epstein files to now the left being give us the Epstein files. And, you know, there's a couple different issues you could say maybe tie into this bizarro world like no new wars, no new foreign entanglements, no new strikes, and then the Iran strikes and and more involvement in the Middle East and Trump people kind of trying to make excuses or switch for that. But that's just I don't know. You could even say maybe that's politics is normal. There has been nothing more political bizarro world than the switch on the Epstein files. It is shocking. Now let me just say this. If this had happened a year ago when Biden was in the White House and the Democrats had the Senate and the Democrats had the House and Biden said, we're not gonna do the Epstein files, and Biden's FBI said, we're not gonna do the Epstein files, and Biden's attorney general said, we're not gonna do the Epstein files, and then Republicans tried to get a vote to declassify the Epstein files and the Democrats shut it down, what would you be saying as a Trump voter? What would you be saying as a right winger? What would you be saying as a conservative? Don't tell me you wouldn't be outraged. Don't tell me you wouldn't say Joe Biden was covering it up. Don't tell me you wouldn't be screaming how the Democrats are covering up sex trafficking. Of course, you would. But, oh, because it's Trump and the Republicans, now you're okay with it. And if you're already making excuses as to why you're okay with it now or, oh, it's Trump and not Biden, then yet again, it shows how we're in political bizarro world and it shows how easily controlled both sides of the political aisle are. Clown world. I thought we left clown world. We're right back in it, Except now it's bizarro form.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@NoLieWithBTC - No Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen

There it is. Republicans just BLOCKED the release of the Epstein Files.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The amendment was put to a vote. Those in favor signified by saying aye; those opposed say no. The chair ruled the noes have it, and the amendment is not agreed to. A roll call was requested. The roll call results were: - Missus Fishbach: No - Mister Norman: Yes - Mister Roy: No - Missus Houchin: No - Mister Langworthy: No - Mister Scott: No - Mister Griffith: No - Mister Jack: No - Mister McGovern: Aye - Miss Gantlin: Aye - Mister Nugoose: Aye - Miss Ledger Fernandez: Aye - Madam chair: No The clerk reported the total as 5 yeas and 7 nays. The amendment remains not agreed to. The chair indicated that what’s appropriate will be released when it is time for the president to release it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hearing none, the questions on the amendment. All those in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Those opposed say no. No. No. In the opinion chair, the noes have it. The amendment is not agreed. Speaker 1: I'm kinda shocked by that. I will ask for a roll call. Speaker 0: The clerk will call the roll. Speaker 1: Missus Fishbach? No. Missus Fishbach, no. Mister Norman? Yeah. Mister Norman, I. Mister Roy, missus Houchin? No. Missus Houchin? No. Mister Langworthy? No. Mister Langworthy? No. Mister Scott? Mister Scott, no. Mister Griffith? Mister Griffith? No. Mister Jack? No. Mister Jack, no. Mister McGovern? Aye. Mister McGovern, aye. Miss Gantlin? Yes. Miss Gantlin, aye. Mister Nugoose? Yes. Mister Nugoose, aye. Miss Ledger Fernandez? Aye. Miss Ledger Fernandez, aye. Madam chair? No. Madam chair, no. The clerk will report the total. 5 yeas, seven a's. Speaker 0: The noes have it. The amendment is not agreed to. And I think most of us believe what's appropriate will be released when it is time for the president to release it. Speaker 1: Well, madam Speaker 0: Thank you.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@deSunShineBand - CS

Zou ‘t waar zijn?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Due to this villa worth over $20,000,000, no one believes Greta Thunberg anymore. She’s always publicly claimed that living modestly was her life’s goal, insisting that she rejected luxury in order to remain true to her message. But recently, journalists uncovered that this stunning villa you’re looking at now is actually registered in her name. Rumors quickly circulated that a wealthy Hollywood activist had gifted the property to Greta, but many remained doubtful. Critics argue that the funds may have come from the humanitarian campaigns she personally organized in countries around the raising serious questions about transparency. The revelation has sparked intense debate with many feeling betrayed and questioning whether Greta’s image of simplicity and sacrifice was ever real. Whether the villa was truly a gift or not, the controversy has left lasting stain on her reputation, making people wonder if her carefully built persona was just an illusion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Because of this villa worth over $20,000,000, no one believes Greta Thunberg anymore. She's always publicly claimed that living modestly was her life's goal, insisting that she rejected luxury in order to remain true to her message. But recently, journalists uncovered that this stunning villa you're looking at now is actually registered in her name. Rumors quickly circulated that a wealthy Hollywood activist had gifted the property to Greta, but many remained doubtful. Critics argue that the funds may have come from the humanitarian campaigns she personally organized in countries around the raising serious questions about transparency. The revelation has sparked intense debate with many feeling betrayed and questioning whether Greta's image of simplicity and sacrifice was ever real. Whether the villa was truly a gift or not, the controversy has left lasting stain on her reputation, making people wonder if her carefully built persona was just an illusion.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

From Satire To Reality - False Green Agenda & Climate Change https://www.bitchute.com/video/sVvOHRofonXi Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

From Satire To Reality - False Green Agenda & Climate Change Do it for grandma and the children... bitchute.com

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/rndgGtZ31Y Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

MAHA Action just deleted this new video of RFK Jr. talking about how they're developing a new universal vaccine at NIH for corona and flu which is "gonna be a much safer and more effective vaccine". Hazard a guess on why they'd do that? https://t.co/nClS18k2hS

Video Transcript AI Summary
The NIH is developing a universal vaccine that addresses the entire phylum of viruses. This vaccine mimics natural immunity and is effective against any kind of mutation. It doesn't drive the virus to mutate. The researchers believe it could be effective not only against coronaviruses but also against influenza. The vaccine is described as much safer and much more effective. The exchange then notes that Mark, did you take your question again? and Mark is prompted to ask his question.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Right now, we're developing a universal vaccine at NIH, which is a vaccine that addresses the entire phylum of viruses. And so it's a it's a vaccine that mimics natural immunity, and it and it it is effective against any kind of mutation. So it doesn't drive the virus to mutate, and it could be effective. We believe it's gonna be effective about against not only coronaviruses, but also flu. And it's gonna be a much more much safer and much more effective vaccine. Mark, did you take your question again? Now we're developing a universal vaccine at NIH, which is a vaccine that addresses the entire phylum of viruses. And so it's a it's a vaccine that mimics natural immunity, and it and it it is effective against any kind of mutation. So it doesn't drive the virus to mutate, and it could be effective. We believe it's gonna be effective about against not only coronaviruses, but also flu. And it's gonna be a much more much safer and much more effective vaccine. Mark, did you have your question?

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/LwMuuuhYWA Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Insight into why Israel has a leash on Trump (IMO) "In the early '90s...Trump... declares bankruptcy... he's bailed out by Wilbur Ross... representing the Rothschild banking interests... the Rothschild family has a very long... history with Zionism and... the State of Israel." This clip of Whitney Webb (@_whitneywebb), author of One Nation Under Blackmail and contributing editor of unlimitedhangout(.)com, is taken from an interview with Kim Iversen (@KimIversenShow) posted to Rumble on August 6, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "And then in the early '90s, Trump's Atlantic City holdings, and other things, dragged down his business empire. And he declares bankruptcy, and in order to be bailed out, he's bailed out by, Wilbur Ross, who he later rewards for that when he's president, the first time making him Commerce Secretary. "But at the time, Wilbur Ross was representing the Rothschild banking interests. And the Rothschild banking interest, specifically this Wall Street M and A arm that they opened up in the '80s was responsible for bringing Robert Maxwell to New York. "So basically, you know, Trump as a business icon would not have existed beyond the early 1990s if it wasn't for the, Rothschild banking interests, who have a lot of affiliations to people and sort of, the Epstein network, and specifically Epstein's financial crimes, which include a lot of currency speculation in this, what the New York Times once called a currency speculation cabal, including people like Jimmy Goldsmith, also backed by the Rothschilds, and even George Soros, whose first, his Quantum Fund in, like, the late '60s was bankrolled by the French Rothschild interests. "And for anyone that's familiar, the Rothschild family has a very, long and storied history with Zionism and the establishment of the State of Israel and and being a major patron of that. So, you know, they've definitely had a lot of influence, I would think, over, Trump now, since he owes them a lot."

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the early 1990s, Trump’s Atlantic City Holdings and other ventures dragged down his business empire, leading to bankruptcy. To secure a bailout, he was aided by Wilbur Ross, who later became commerce secretary under Trump. At that time, Wilbur Ross represented the Rothschild banking interests. The Rothschilds, specifically the Wall Street mergers and acquisitions arm they opened in the 1980s, were responsible for bringing Robert Maxwell to New York. The narrative asserts that Trump, as a business icon, would not have existed beyond the early 1990s if it weren’t for the Rothschild banking interests, which are described as having extensive affiliations with people in the Epstein network. The transcript links Epstein’s financial crimes to currency speculation described by the New York Times as a “currency speculation cabal,” and names individuals such as Jamie Goldsmith as being backed by the Rothschilds, as well as George Soros, whose Quantum Fund in the late 1960s was bankrolled by French Rothschild interests. The account emphasizes a long and storied history between the Rothschild family and Zionism, including the establishment of the state of Israel, and portrays the Rothschilds as major patrons of that cause. It concludes by suggesting that the Rothschilds have had substantial influence over Trump, asserting that Trump owes them a great deal. Overall, the narrative draws a chain of connections: the Rothschild banking interests’ influence helped shape Trump’s rise and persistence as a prominent business figure, with Wilbur Ross’s bailout role in the 1990s serving as a pivotal link, and various high-profile financial networks—Epstein-related cohorts, currency speculation participants, and financiers like Jamie Goldsmith and George Soros—being connected to Rothschilds. It also foregrounds the Rothschilds’ historical ties to Zionism and the establishment of Israel as part of their influence, asserting that these relationships have translated into ongoing sway over Trump.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Then in the early nineties, Trump's Atlantic City Holdings, and other things dragged down his business empire, and he declares bankruptcy. And in order to be bailed out, he's bailed out by, Wilbur Ross, who he later rewards for that when he's president. The first time making him commerce secretary. But at the time, Wilbur Ross was representing the Rothschild banking interests. And the Rothschild banking interests, specifically this Wall Street m and a arm that they opened up in the eighties, was responsible for bringing Robert Maxwell to New York. So, basically, you know, Trump as a business icon would not have existed beyond the night early nineteen nineties if it wasn't for, the Rothschild banking interests, who have a lot of affiliations to people in sort of, the Epstein network and specifically Epstein's financial crimes, which include a lot of currency speculation in this, what the New York Times once called a currency speculation cabal, including people like Jamie Goldsmith also backed by the Rothschilds and even George Soros whose first, his quantum fund in, like, the late sixties was bankrolled by the French Rothschild interest. And if for anyone that's familiar, the Rothschild family has a very, long and storied history with Zionism and the establishment of the state of Israel and and being a major patron of that. So, you know, they've definitely had a lot of influence, I would think, over, Trump now since he owes them a lot. And also

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/VeHAF1Ik18 Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@DollarVigilante - The Dollar Vigilante

One of the most obvious CIA assets in the limelight. #TuckerCarlson https://t.co/gp5HTZhVbv

Video Transcript AI Summary
Several speakers discuss the idea that Tucker Carlson is a CIA asset. Speaker 0 argues that Carlson “is clearly a CIA asset,” noting that you don’t rise to a global audience and make money from edgy content unless you’re “in the big club.” They point to a supposed inconsistency: Carlson recently said he was shocked to discover his dad was in the CIA upon his death in March 2025, yet, “here he is in June 2024, like a year earlier, admitting his father was CIA.” They state Carlson “said he only found out in 2025 after his father died, but here he is in 2024 saying he knew his dad was CIA.” Speaker 1 adds personal details, saying, “when I applied to CIA, and I’ve taken a lot of crap including from Putin, like, you’re from a CIA family.” They acknowledge that “my father worked in conjunction with CIA,” and that they tried to join the CIA but were not being false about it, and that “he’s attacking my dad because the CIA is dad to the CIA or whatever.” They claim, “Then my father dies and I learn actually, yeah, you know, was involved in that world. I was completely shocked by it.” Speaker 0 amplifies the claim by referencing Tucker Carlson with “an ex CIA agent” who says to Carlson, “you’re a lot more on the inside than me.” They find it interesting that Carlson “is like a ex CIA agent. He’s saying Tucker Carlson’s more on the inside than he is.” They encourage listeners to pay attention to Tucker’s response, saying, “listen to Tucker’s response and I want you to pay attention this because it’s in these moments that you actually can see what’s actually going on.” Speaker 2 briefly interjects with uncertainty about deals that took place, and Speaker 1 comments that they have “not made $1 in The Middle East, not 1.” Speaker 2 says, “Well, I mean, if you’re allowed me more on the inside than I am.” Speaker 1 denies, saying, “No. No. No. I’m just a I’m just a visitor and a traveler and a watcher, but I don’t, you know.” The conversation ends with Speaker 0 asking, “Did you kinda see what happened there?”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I think people are actually starting to catch on to what I've been saying for a long time. I've been saying this for years. Tucker Carlson is clearly a CIA asset. You don't get into Fox and, then get out and get, like, this audience of, like, the entire world and say things that are, you know, a little bit edgy and make tons of money unless you're in the big club. And it's actually starting to come out now. Like, he recently said that, he was shocked to discover his dad was in the CIA upon his death in March 2025. But here he is in June 2024, like a year earlier, admitting his father was CIA. So he said he only found out in 2025 after his father died, but here he is in 2024 saying he knew his dad was CIA. Speaker 1: And so when I applied to CIA, and I've taken a lot of crap including from Putin, like, you're from a CIA family. Well, yeah, obviously, my father worked in conjunction with CIA. I mean, that's what that is. And I tried to join the CIA, but I'm not being false about it. And he's attacking my dad because the CIA is dad to the CIA or whatever. And I'm like, well, that's no. Untrue. Then my father dies and I learn actually, yeah, you know, was involved in that world. I was completely shocked by it. Speaker 0: Like here's Tucker Carlson with an ex CIA agent and the CIA agent says to him, you're a lot more on the inside than me. That's interesting. Like, he's like a ex CIA agent. He's saying Tucker Carlson's more on the inside than he is. Listen to Tucker's response and I want you to pay attention this because it's in these moments that you actually can see what's actually going on. Speaker 2: Like, just get done also with the deals that just happened over there, or was this earlier? I don't you would probably know. Speaker 1: No. I don't know. You don't? I've not made $1 in The Middle East, not 1. Speaker 2: Well, I mean I mean, if you're allowed me more on the inside than I am. Speaker 1: And No. No. No. I'm just a I'm just a visitor and a traveler and a watcher, but I don't, you know. Speaker 0: Did you kinda see what happened there?

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/KmYhsJKABW Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@flatsmackin - DemonstrableReality

Think about the fact that the masses believed this and still do. 😳 https://t.co/Zs9VEa6u4G

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/9zUcgRbvNg Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@realstewpeters - Stew Peters

Trump just authorized FOUR NEW COVID VACCINES. https://t.co/zfLl0JZsUg

Video Transcript AI Summary
The question asked whether the president believes the COVID vaccine should be available to and covered by insurance for all Americans regardless of age and preexisting conditions. The response notes that the FDA recently revoked the emergency youth authorizations for three COVID vaccinations while simultaneously approving four new COVID-19 vaccines with 2025 and 2026 formulas. The revocation is described as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic and the public health emergency being over. To correct the record, it is stated that the FDA’s decision does not affect the availability of COVID vaccines for Americans who want them. The administration says, “We believe in individual choice,” a promise the president and the secretary have made and delivered on.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: From miscommunications or differences on vaccine policy. So I wonder if you could just say whether or not the president believes that the COVID vaccine should be available to and covered by insurance for all Americans regardless of age and preexisting conditions. What I will tell you is that the FDA recently revoked the emergency youth authorizations for three COVID vaccinations while simultaneously green lighting four new COVID nineteen vaccines with twenty twenty five and twenty twenty six formulas. The the reason for the revocation of that emergency youth authorization is because obviously the COVID pandemic and the public health emergency is over. But just to correct the record because there's been a lot of misinformation on this, the FDA's decision does not affect the availability of COVID vaccines for Americans who want them. We believe in individual choice. That's a promise both the president and the secretary have made, and it's a promise they have now delivered on.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/gDeAS03UKD Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@SemperVeritasX - John-Paul Berg

Pierre Poilievre is not a nationalist. He isn't even a conservative. The guy is a controlled opposition, uniparty globalist. They're all in on it together. The entirety of our politics is an elaborate performative charade to provide the illusion of participatory governance to the peasantry. This has never been more evident. Every day I wonder when you people will notice.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/7Z7bVBlQjG Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@PatteeuwJens - Jens Patteeuw

Just a few days ago, Bill Gates met with Trump at the White House. This is the second time they have met; at the beginning of the year, they had a dinner. Gates said then that he was "impressed" with Trump’s interest in global health at that time. For all those who somehow hoped that Gates would be arrested or that Trump would do it, just forget it. It's not gonna happen, at all. This recent meeting happened around the same time Karoline Leavitt, the White House Press Secretary, announced there would be four new covid vaccines. Also, earlier this week, Trump again reiterated that Operation Warp Speed (the COVID-19 vaccines) was a huge success. There's a lot more than meets the eye. We can't forget that Bill Gates publicly endorsed JD Vance's book "Hillbilly Elegy" on his own blog in 2017. So he was already promoting JD Vance before he became "famous". JD Vance is sponsored by globalist and Bilderberg member Peter Thiel. In light of the recent statements of JD Vance, saying that he "is ready to take over", if "God forbid something terrible would happen", this is all very peculiar. #Trump #BillGates #news

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/Ged4Fu9cXF Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@ShannonJoyRadio - Shannon Joy

Don't fall for this scam @liz_churchill10 Trump is NOT going to war with PHARMA, he's HELPING them by providing a reason to eliminate ALL the 'old vaccines' because of thimerosal. Trump, RFK & Bhattacharya have been heavily promoting 'operation warp speed tactics' to develop new, universal mRNA and sa-mRNA shots for PHARMA to replace traditional vaccines. This is NOT Trump waking up, or doing the right thing, or launching a 'war against vaccines' ... this is a MARKETING CAMPAIGN for the new mRNA technology. And they WILL MANDATE these. DO NOT FALL FOR THIS!

@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill

Oh. My. God. President Trump calls out the VACCINE TERRORISTS…https://t.co/dJLDTn9xbX

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 shows a metal container described as a “thimerosal bomb,” noting they keep it because they are a little afraid of it, and it is a very fine powder. Speaker 2 states that thimerosal is labeled very toxic and has cumulative effects, capable of causing damage to the kidneys, respiratory system, skin, and nervous system. It specifically warns of reproductive and developmental toxicity, meaning it can cause things like autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders. They emphasize that this is immensely toxic stuff. Speaker 0 notes that thimerosal is present in a vaccine. Speaker 2 explains that thimerosal is used in a whole range of products, with vaccines being a major example because it is directly injected. They reference the tetanus vaccine, noting a vial that expires and contains thimerosal as a preservative. They claim that thimerosal has been a big exposure issue in the United States, especially with the influenza vaccine, which is now recommended for all pregnant women, all infants, and all children on a yearly basis. Speaker 1 adds a point about how thimerosal is added: it is not something added at the end after production but is incorporated because the factory is not clean and not sterile. They argue that either there must be an expensive sterile factory that does not need thimerosal or one that produces thimerosal, and that thimerosal would need to be used throughout production. They assert that the use of thimerosal needs to be stopped. Speaker 2 identifies the influenza vaccine from Adventist Pasture, “their flu zone,” and states that it contains twenty-five micrograms of mercury per dose. Speaker 1 discusses personal experience, noting that many people did not know about thimerosal. They reveal they have given 2,000 RhoGAM shots and have been in vaccines for thirty-five years, and they did not know that RhoGAM contained thimerosal. They suggest that many doctors were unaware that the term “thimerosal” referred to mercury.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Show them the thimerosal bomb, which we keep in a metal container because we're a Speaker 1: little afraid of it, and it's a very fine powder. Speaker 2: This is this is thimerosal, which is labeled very toxic. Has cumulative effects, can cause damage to the kidneys, to the respiratory system, skin, to the nervous system. Specifically warns on here that it can cause reproductive and developmental toxicity, meaning that it can cause things like autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders. This is immensely toxic stuff. Speaker 0: And it's a vaccine. Speaker 2: And this is what's in the vaccine. It's important to to realize we're talking about a whole range of products. Vaccines are a big one because, of course, you're directly injecting it. For example, this is tetanus vaccine. This one expires. It's a lot dated now in 02/2007. Here's the thimerosal. 1 to October is a preservative. Perhaps the the biggest one in The US, at least, that's ex for exposure to mercury is the influenza Influenza vaccine is now recommended for all pregnant women, all infants, all children on a yearly basis. You're supposed to Speaker 1: You have last year's influenza? Understand that Thimerosal is not added at the end. It's not like, well, that factory next year can make Thimerosal free. Thimerosal, you either have to have a thimerosal free factory or you have to not have one. They add thimerosal at each step because the factory is not clean and not sterile. So you either have to have an expensive sterile factory where you don't need thimerosal or you have to have one that produces thimerosal. It's gonna need thimerosal or something the whole time. It needs to be stopped. Speaker 2: This is, the influenza vaccine from Adventist Pasture, their flu zone. Thimerosal, twenty five micrograms of mercury per dose. Speaker 1: I'd like to point out that a lot of people didn't know, and and I'm one of Speaker 2: them. Speaker 1: I've given 2,000 RhoGAM shots. I've been in vaccines for thirty five years. I didn't know that RhoGAM had Thimerosal in it. So I think a lot of the doctors were unaware. They weren't aware that even the word Thimerosal meant mercury.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/ilrV1mCNCT Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@JuanGutiCA714 - Juan Hodl

Alex Krainer explains who is at the top of the “globalist network”: These are networks of power that operate outside of the rule of law… like a mafia. In everything I’ve read it always emerges that this name Rothschild comes up as the people who seemingly wield the most power. https://t.co/emySyfd1uK

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 explains that the network is a meta tribe of oligarchs centered in a history starting with Cecil Rhodes, who envisioned a world controlled by the elite. He says Rhodes handed the vision to Milner and the Milner group, describing Milner as “my blood brother” and noting that Milner was committed. The network expanded from a Crown/London core to encompass Wall Street, the American Deep State, and major banking families named in Tragedy and Hope. He defines the network as a broad, elite circle and notes there isn’t a single top person. Speaker 1 references Tragedy and Hope and Carrol Quigley, along with Guido Preparata’s Conjuring Hitler, as key to understanding what happened in 1938. He asserts that Quigley gave readers the keys in a long but detailed work, suggesting that the powers of financial capitalism sought “to create a world system of financial control in private hands, to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole,” with the growth of financial capitalism enabling a decentralization of world economic control and benefiting financiers while harming other economic groups. He connects this to Russia in the 1990s, arguing that oligarchs like Mikhail Khodorkovsky and others were not merely reform-minded tycoons but “handpicked trustees” serving foreign financial interests, with figures such as George Soros and Edmund Safra involved. Speaker 1 adds that, despite a claim there’s no top, there must be one at the top since these are networks of power operating outside the rule of law, like a mafia. He contends Rothschilds are often the top-wielding group, with others subordinated to them, and that civil wars can erupt among these bankers when crises arise. He suggests American bankers may be challenging British bankers for ascendancy, implying a current (unspecified) civil conflict within the network. He acknowledges the difficulty of knowing what happens behind closed walls and notes the top dog concept exists: “there must be a top of the hierarchy because, otherwise the whole system… there'd be like you have a pack of dogs. There’s always going to be a top dog.” Speaker 0 agrees with the “lead dog” principle and adds that there are multiple major families or clans, each with its own leadership. He emphasizes a “family element” to the network, referencing “pancake” or mafioso-style families, and remarks that this discussion provides a concise, one-stop shop for understanding the topic. Speaker 0 then signals a transition to the next point with enthusiasm.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But the network, Alex, broadly who are the network? Because it's clear from tragedy and hope, I'd say is the most accurate around. It kind of starts mainly in the modern times with, Cecil Rhodes who had the vision, right, to have a world completely controlled by the elite. No conspiracy theory, it's all documented. And then he handed over to Milner and the Milner group, and he said Milner basically, he said, is my blood brother. He fully entrusted him with the vision. Mildner was committed. And then you have this whole crown kind of city of London, UK, powerful network that eventually became a network that encompassed Wall Street and the American Deep State, if you want to call it, and of course all the great banking families, many of them named in tragedy and hope. Is getting towards like, what the network is? It's a meta tribe of oligarchs. And that's why it's kinda hard to to get right to the guy at the top. There isn't really a guy at the top. It's all of what I said and more. Yeah? Speaker 1: Yes. Look. I I read Tragedy and Hope, and I read it very carefully. And in fact, this whole story about appeasement, I reconstructed it from Carole Quigley. And with some subsequent research by the guy who wrote conjuring Hitler. That's that's a masterpiece. His name is Guido Antonio Preparata. Okay? And that book is not as not as long, but it's it's it's, like, dense. It's, like, completely fluffy, and it, like, blows your mind. So from those two books, I reconstructed the what actually happened in 1938 in in Munich. Anyway so, basically, Carroll Quigley, I believe that he gave us the keys. He just couldn't come out exactly and give it away because it would be too you know, the it would have been spotted straight away. So he put it in a into a book that's, like, thirteen, four 1,400 pages long, and then you have to read it very carefully, but it's a lot is there. A lot is there. And I will I will read to you. I have this in front of me the maybe the key quote, which which tells you what we're up against. And the one so this is this is the key quote from Carroll Quigley. I think many people are already familiar by this, but he says that the powers of financial capitalism had a far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands, to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. The growth of financial capitalism made possible a decentralization of world economic control and use of this power for the direct benefit of financiers and direct injury of all other economic groups. And so this quote, when you take when you keep that in mind and you look at what happened in Russia in the nineteen nineties, it's it's exactly what happened. And then you you also find out that these people like Mikhail Khodorkovsky and these other oligarchs, that they were not just, you know, Russian tycoons who emerged because they were very capable and, you know, aggressive young reformers as they were presented in the media in the West. They were handpicked trustees who were serving the needs of the foreign financial interests. And so Mikhail Khodorkovsky was a trustee for Jacob Rothschild's interests in Russia. George Soros was there, involved very prominently. Edmund Safra, and and a numb a a number of a number of high profile western bankers. But, you know, when you say that there's nobody at the top, I think that there's somebody at the top necessarily because, you know, this is you know, these are these are networks of power, and you're right to call it a network. These are networks of power that operate outside of the rule of law. So they're not bound by lawful institutions. This is like law of the jungle. It it functions like a like a mafia like a mafia business, like a mafia organization, which means that somebody necessarily has to be at the top to enforce the order. You know, you can't have democracy at at that level. So in in everything that I've read so far, it always emerges that this name Rothschild comes up as as the people who seemingly wield the most power, and then everybody else is kind of in a in a subordinate position to them. And I think that when things are going well, they they get along, and they work as a club. And, you know, I'm in charge, but you have your own suzerainty there, and you have your own you know, you dominate your own. But when things get difficult, when the system comes to a crisis, then you see that you might have civil wars there between these bankers. And I think that we're living in a period when these civil wars are erupting again. And it seems to me that the American bankers feel that they no longer have to be subordinated to the to the British bankers. And I think that part of what we see today might be that civil war. Of course, we don't know anything about this. We can just look at where smoke you know, which orifice produces the smoke, and then we can just try to kind of wonder what what actually happened behind the the closed walls. But Yeah. You know, there must be there must be top of the hierarchy because, otherwise the whole system you know, it'd be like you have a pack of dogs. There's always going to be a top dog. And if there isn't a top dog, the other dogs are going to fight to the death until one emerges as the top dog, and then they'll be at peace. Speaker 0: Yeah. And that's the lead dog kind of principle. Absolutely. You know, a slight variant on that to allow for not one kingpin to your mafia analogy, there's a bunch of major families and each of them sure has the dawn. But maybe there isn't a single one, but there's certainly a cluster of key lead dogs. And the beautiful elegance of that is because we're talking about families, right? Pancake families, Baffia families. There's a family element to it. And you know, I was going to my next bullet point. This is fantastic, Alex. This is a one stop shop for Speaker 1: everyone Speaker 0: to know.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/sHrMmZdmZ4 Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@MareQay - Mare Qay

Dang, wonder how many at the time were paying attention https://t.co/OgKK62YlUC

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses that they wanted to meet face to face to get admission of what “they” were doing. Speaker 1 identifies “they” as someone in the office of the Trilateral Commission. Speaker 0 asks what the Trilateral Commission is. Speaker 1 explains that it is “an organization founded in 1973 by David Rockefeller to bring together business and political leaders from The United States, Europe, Japan so they could work together for better economic and political cooperation between their nations.” Speaker 0 counters that this is what they’d like people to believe, but claims that “what they’re really up to is a scheme to plant their own loyal members in positions of power in this country to work to erase national boundaries and create an international community, and in time, bring about a one world government with David Rockefeller calling the shots.” Speaker 0 asks if they’re pressing charges; agrees that a globe was broken and UNICEF artwork damaged, and adds that “they’re in on it too.” Speaker 0 asks for a Mister Klein, who replies that he has documented evidence and “the magazines here” are Conspiracy Review and Suppressed Truth Roundup, asserting that “the whole master plan is exposed.” Speaker 0 notes that Klein remains unconvinced and asks if he’d like to hear a few names of people who have been on the Trilateral Commission. Klein is not particularly enthusiastic. Speaker 1 lists names: James O’Carter (likely a misreference or fictionalized name), Henry Kissinger, Walter Mondale, and Mister Klein, then John Anderson, George Bush. Speaker 0 recalls the convention where it seemed Ford would be the VP candidate, but says David Rockefeller “just picked up a phone, put in a call,” saying, “Hey, Ronnie. Forget Jerry. It’s George. Bye.” He concludes that “no matter who won in November, they had their man in the White House.” Speaker 0 asks if they are through. The response is implied as yes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I just wanted to meet them face to face. I I wanted them to admit what they were doing. Who is they? Speaker 1: He was in the office of the trilateral commission. Speaker 0: Trilateral commission? Speaker 1: Yeah. The trilateral commission. Speaker 0: Alright. What is the trilateral commission? Speaker 1: It's an organization founded in 1973 by David Rockefeller to bring together business and political leaders from The United States, Europe, Japan so they could work together for better economic and political cooperation between their nations. Speaker 0: Well, that that's what they'd like us to believe. But you see, Speaker 2: what they're really up to is a scheme to plant Speaker 0: their own loyal members in positions of power in this country to work to erase national boundaries and create an international community, and in time, bring about a one world government with David Rockefeller calling the shots. I take it they're pressing charges? Yeah. Well, I I he broke a globe and and some UNICEF artwork. Well, they're they're in on it too. Okay, mister Klein. I'm just telling you our whole way of life as we know it is in jeopardy. I appreciate that information. But I I I have I have the documented evidence. It's all in there. Show him. Well, he's got got these magazines here. Conspiracy review, Suppressed truth roundup? The whole master plan is exposed. Yeah. Well, You're still not convinced. Would would you like to hear the names of just a few of the people who have been on the trilateral commission? Not particularly. James O'Carter. Heard of him? Look, mister Klein Henry Kissinger. You heard of him? Walter Mondale. Who? Mister Klein, this is John Anderson, George Bush. Now you remember at the at the convention, everybody thought it was gonna be Ford for Veep. You know what happened? David Rockefeller just picked up a phone, put in a call. Hey, Ronnie. Forget Jerry. It's George. Bye. So no matter who won in November, they had their man in the White House. Are you through? Yeah.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/gVAqsDDlpV Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@SapperWarrior - 100% MAGA, BUT FUCK TRUMP 🇷🇺 🇺🇸 🇷🇺 🇺🇸

Trump, who has turned into the biggest neocon in presidential history, just did more to validate and help the globalist swamp warmongers than any Democrat or RINO could’ve ever hoped for. After campaigning for and voting for Trump in every election, I feel furiously betrayed 😡 https://t.co/2puCajgELc

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/bgtuPShdt4 Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@ITMTrading - ITM Trading

Charlie Kirk Assassination Fuels Elite’s Reset Plan for Great Depression 2.0 - Ed Dowd Watch now: https://youtu.be/kSCyKHsTBAo #finance #money #dollar #usd #gold @DanielaCambone @DowdEdward https://t.co/e1Ok9JWuXs

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/URjsmXXTUQ Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@AllenDMartin - Allen Martin

Pfizer murdered my 18 yo daughter! mRNA batch fn2908. Nov 9,2022. @Potus just awarded @pfizer a 70 BILLION CONTRACT ... to murder more people! The man standing beside him today, shook my hand and promised to make them pay, less than a year ago. Here I am, STILL TRYING TO PAY OFF HER FUNERAL!!!! I don't need 70 billion, I only need about $4,000 so she can have a fucking headstone!!!! THEY MURDERED HER AND NOW THEY'RE "LEADERS" AND "GREAT PEOPLE"!?! FUCK YOU! THE GASLIGHTING IS TOO MUCH! I CAN'T FUCKING TAKE IT ANYMORE!

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/5yCbPoG5Pw Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

Before the election: ‘We’ll release the Epstein files.’ After the election: They protect the pedophiles. Before the election: ‘We’ll end the wars.’ After the election: They fund genocide. Before the election: ‘We’ll go after COVID crimes.’ After the election: They hand $70 billion to Pfizer. I can’t stomach it anymore. This administration is a disgrace.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/WPEE8N9FNB Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@Alec_Zeck - D. Alec Zeck

I think I’m at the point where I just appreciate the comedic absurdity of it all. Some people genuinely believe Trump is a freedom fighter, secretly leading a military operation to take down the deep state. Others believe he’s the literal embodiment of evil and the sole cause of all modern problems. And then there are those who still believe that voting matters and that legitimate, lasting solutions are going to come from politics. At this point, it’s like watching different cults argue over which illusion is more real and it’s hilarious (and sometimes disturbing).

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/GOf5RzPXM5 Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@davidicke - David Icke

This is what I have said for years about the hard sell and soft sell of AI dystopia. People like Gates and Schwab have gone for the hard sell and for the sceptics Musk goes for the soft sell. The outcome in BOTH cases? Human-AI fusion - we think what AI tells us to think - and total human AI/digital enslavement. It's a pincer movement by two cheeks on the same backside - Gates and Schwab are cast as the pantomime villains while Musk plays the good guy who cares and only wants the best for you. Pure theatre. See my new book The Road Map in which I take the pantomime apart.

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🚨🇺🇸 ELON: xAI WAS BUILT TO LOVE HUMANITY “I created xAI to have an AI that is maximally truth-seeking, that aspirationally loves humanity and will seek the best interests of humanity going forward.” Elon described the mission as building AI that helps, but doesn’t replace https://t.co/wngEPrL9jF

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: I really want to have a maximally truth seeking AI. I can't emphasize that enough. That's incredibly important. And obviously build an AI that loves humanity. That's why I created xAI, which is to have an AI that is maximally truth seeking, aspirationally does love humanity, and will seek the best interests of humanity going forward.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Really want to have a maximally truth seeking AI. I can't emphasize that enough. That's incredibly important. And obviously build an AI that loves humanity. That's why I created xAI, which is to to have an AI that is maximally truth seeking, that aspirationally does love humanity, and will seek the best interests of humanity going forward.
Saved - April 29, 2025 at 1:26 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve uncovered a disturbing link between SSRIs and mass shootings, which was openly discussed in the 1990s but has since been buried. Despite evidence showing that these drugs can trigger violence, the FDA and Big Pharma have downplayed their risks. Many mass shooters had psychiatric histories involving SSRIs, yet the media remains silent. Withdrawal from these medications can be dangerous, and the industry continues to profit while victims suffer. It’s crucial to recognize the potential dangers of SSRIs and demand accountability from those responsible.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

EXPOSED: The Chilling SSRI Link to Mass Shootings In the early 1990s, major media outlets openly reported on the connection between Prozac, suicide, and murder. The public was warned that SSRIs could trigger mass violence. But then, in 1997, everything changed. What happened? And why did the media go silent? 🧵 THREAD

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

📌 Before we dive in, bookmark this thread. Only by uncovering the past can you truly understand how to repair the broken, corrupted system we’re living with today.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Big Pharma gaslit the world for decades. They said SSRIs are the silver bullet. They said they didn’t cause psychotic violence. Mentally ill people were just already dangerous. midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-evidence…

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

But hidden clinical trial data, black-box warnings, and bone-chilling real-world cases tell a completely different story. The truth is, SSRIs are not just correlated with violence—they cause it.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The FDA fought tooth and nail to block warning labels for SSRIs. Only after mass public pressure and mountains of evidence did a suicide warning finally get added—proving some level of causation.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

But as @MidwesternDoc's report details, they knew the truth all along. midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-evidence…

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

SSRIs like Prozac, Zoloft, and Paxil don’t just block serotonin—they hijack the brain’s reward system. It’s a lot like cocaine. After Prozac hit the market in 1988, the FDA received 39,000 adverse event reports. Really significant things like suicides, psychosis, and murders. And that was only the beginning.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc With so many red flags after it hit the market, you would have expected Prozac to be pulled. If not to protect people by regulating drugs, what exactly is the FDA for?

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc To truly understand how deep the corruption runs, check out @MidwesternDoc’s article exposing the FDA for what it really is. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-fdas-war-on-americas-health

The FDA's War On America's Health Why do so many innovative therapies never see the light of day midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

They’ve tried to hide the evidence, but the truth is: Mass shootings and SSRIs are heavily intertwined. There’s a clear pattern in mass shootings. Whenever a shooter’s medical history becomes public, psychiatric drugs are almost always involved—and it’s usually SSRIs. But after Big Pharma started buying up media ads in 1997, those details somehow got buried.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

You’ve seen the claims and the memes connecting mass shooters to SSRIs. You’ve probably seen the way the media responds. And maybe you’ve believed them. But the truth is clear. It’s not a conspiracy theory—it’s a coverup. SSRIs quietly reprogram normal people into ticking time bombs by triggering something called akathisia. Akathisia is a torturous state of inner restlessness and suicidal rage. Yikes.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Clearly, akathisia is no joke. It’s so unbearable that people describe it as feeling "possessed" or attacked by "dark forces." Patients under akathisia often commit acts of suicide or homicide—and some even have no memory of the events afterward. And this is apparently okay according to the FDA.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Watch this heartbreaking video of David Carmichael who killed his 11-year-old son while on SSRIs. He is now an outspoken critic of the drugs. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dwJ1TJSa7Ao

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Multiple court cases have exposed pharmaceutical giants like GSK and Pfizer. Internal documents revealed they knew their drugs caused violence and suicide. And what did they do? They hid it from the public. Juries have even found them liable for murder. But the drugs have stayed on the market anyway. If you were prescribed a medication that may make you commit suicide or homicide… would you want to be warned? I think the answer is obvious.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @MidwesternDoc's report reveals that clinical trials showed SSRIs caused psychotic violence (ie. suicides) but the industry hid the evidence until lawsuits revealed the truth. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-evidence-ssri-antidepressants

The Decades of Evidence SSRI Antidepressants Cause Mass Shootings How Dangerous Must a Drug Be Before it is Pulled from the Market? midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Here are some real examples from real lawsuits: Donald Schell, aged 60, took Paxil for only 48 hours before killing his family and himself. For the very first time, a jury found a pharma firm liable for deaths caused by antidepressant use. Kurt Danysh, who had no history of violence and was inappropriately prescribed Prozac, shot and killed his own father after 17 days of taking the drug. In 1996, Kurt was convicted of murder. But then, in 2004, it was exposed that Eli Lilly hid data that Prozac can cause violent behavior. After 24 years of hard work, Kurt was finally released from prison. Kim Witczak (@woodymatters) had a wrongful death, failure to warn lawsuit against Pfizer after her husband killed himself after taking Zoloft for 5 weeks. After filing the lawsuit, Pfizer sent investigators out to snoop into Kim’s private life. They even talked to her neighbors. In Canada, a judge ruled that Prozac led to the murder of a teen at the hands of his 16-year-old friend.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc And what did the FDA do with all of this evidence? They covered it up. They gaslit parents, buried warnings, ignored rampant trial fraud, and stonewalled Congress. It’s basically the same playbook they ran during COVID.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Mass shooting after mass shooting shows the pattern: • Columbine shooter: SSRIs • Red Lake, Minnesota shooter: An unusually high SSRI dose • Wahluke, Washington: SSRIs that cause hallucinations • Parkland shooter: psychiatric meds • Nashville shooter: psychiatric meds confirmed • And many, many more. In the 1990s, school shootings suddenly shifted from rare to frequent. The timeline overlaps with the introduction of SSRIs into the US market. And yet the media's silence grows louder with every tragedy.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc For a glimpse into what some of these shooters may have experienced, watch this video of Cory Baadsgaard who took a loaded rifle to school after developing SSRI-induced hallucinations. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlnMOee82gA

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

And it's not just shootings. Thousands of akathisia-driven murders and suicides have happened quietly across the country. And many others taking the drugs who don’t become violent have felt as though they’re slowly losing their minds. It’s a terrifying thing to experience. Victims and families were left ruined while Big Pharma raked in $17 billion a year off SSRIs alone.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @MidwesternDoc’s report exposes a shocking truth: clinical trials showed that SSRIs caused psychotic violence and suicide—but the industry hid the evidence for years, until lawsuits finally forced it into the light. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-evidence-ssri-antidepressants

The Decades of Evidence SSRI Antidepressants Cause Mass Shootings How Dangerous Must a Drug Be Before it is Pulled from the Market? midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Unfortunately, stopping SSRIs can be very challenging and even deadly. If you're on an SSRI, never stop suddenly. Withdrawal can be catastrophic—leading to severe depression, psychosis, or violent behavior. Tapering off very slowly under expert care is absolutely critical. Big Pharma and your doctor probably never told you that part. And they probably don’t mind that their patients (or should I say customers) struggle and often fail to quit.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

SSRIs are a billion-dollar weapon of mass destruction. These drugs are not only harmful but have directly caused psychotic violence, including mass shootings. The FDA helped cover it up. The media silenced the victims. And once again, the price was paid in blood. How many more need to die before we stop putting profits over people?

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Thanks for reading! This information was based on a report originally published by @MidwesternDoc. Key details were streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. Read the original report here. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-evidence-ssri-antidepressants

The Decades of Evidence SSRI Antidepressants Cause Mass Shootings How Dangerous Must a Drug Be Before it is Pulled from the Market? midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc For a deeper dive into what modern medicine has overlooked—or intentionally buried—check out these other eye-opening reports by @MidwesternDoc: The Forgotten Cancer Cure Hiding in Plain Sight https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-forgotten-cancer-cure-hiding

The Forgotten Cancer Cure Hiding in Plain Sight How DMSO turns a common dye into a highly potent cancer treatment that's harmless to normal tissue midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Why Do Vaccines Cause Autism? https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-do-vaccines-cause-autism

Why Do Vaccines Cause Autism? Past discoveries that can help us understand the current wave of neurological injuries and the silence surrounding them midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc What’s The Healthiest Water To Drink? https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/whats-the-healthiest-water-to-drink

What's The Healthiest Water To Drink? April's Open Thread midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc While you’re at it, give @MidwesternDoc a follow. No one brings more research, clinical insight, or historical context when it comes to exposing the health myths we’ve all been fed. This is easily one of the most valuable accounts you’ll ever follow. —> @MidwesternDoc https://t.co/BSCAk7IvxZ

Saved - September 1, 2025 at 4:29 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Chaos erupted at the CDC this week with the firing of the director and resignations of officials, who were blamed by the media for destabilizing public health. However, the real issue was the ACIP's new work group, led by Retsef Levi, which aimed to confront the full data on Covid vaccines, including safety and injuries. Levi emphasized the need for transparency and inclusion of all relevant data, challenging the status quo. The resignations revealed a struggle for control over the narrative, as those leaving sought to suppress discussions on vaccine injuries. A reckoning is underway.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Chaos ERUPTED at the CDC this week. The director was fired and officials quit. Mainstream Media blamed RFK Jr. for being “anti-vaccine”. The truth is the CDC tried to block reviews of vaccine injuries. ACIP member Retsef Levi exposed it in an exclusive interview. Thread🧵 https://t.co/Vb9WwbBrie

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

The resignations became headline news, with outlets portraying the CDC as “leaderless” and blaming RFK Jr. for destabilizing public health. But that storyline left out the key fact: these officials weren’t leaving because science was under attack. They were leaving because, for the first time, ACIP was preparing to confront the full data on Covid vaccines — including safety, efficacy, and injuries.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Two weeks earlier, ACIP created a new Covid vaccine work group and named Retsef Levi chair. The Terms of Reference laid out a sweeping mandate: risk-benefit analyses, identifying critical gaps in safety and efficacy, and examining adverse events. This wasn’t a rubber stamp. It was an open door to follow the data wherever it led — and that’s exactly what shook the CDC.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

In an exclusive interview with Maryanne Demasi (go subscribe to her to get the full interview), Levi explained how the clash unfolded. His mandate was clear: no exclusions, no off-limits questions, no ignored data. “We will not exclude any question that is relevant, nor any data source or knowledge source that is available,” he said. The officials who resigned wanted to narrow the scope and keep control. Levi insisted on opening it up.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

The breaking point came over vaccine injuries. Levi said he was “emotionally shocked” at the CDC’s unwillingness to even discuss them. “Recognizing vaccine injuries is a foundational component of any successful vaccine program,” he explained. “We have seen a lot of gaslighting, and leaving the vaccine injured out to dry. I want that to change with this Covid immunisation workgroup and more generally as part of the ACIP work.” The media painted those who resigned as defenders of science. In reality, they were trying to bury the most vulnerable victims.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

Instead of debating the science, CDC leaders tried to stop the work group with legal arguments. “They tried to use the lawyers to say it was not in the scope of ACIP to examine these issues,” Levi said. In the end, they were forced to admit Levi’s plans were in fact in scope of ACIP’s duty’s, but not before turning what should have been basic science into a legal fight.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

This was never about good governance — it was about control. The officials running for the exits shaped the vaccine narrative for years. They know what’s coming if independent scientists are allowed to follow the data. They buried evidence, silenced dissent, and dismissed the injured. Now, with RFK Jr. at HHS and people like Levi at ACIP, their cover is unraveling. A reckoning has begun, and this week was only the start.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Question about the CDC resignation and how the agency can function. "I will confirm that we let go of Susan Menarie yesterday." The CDC is an agency that is very troubled for a very long time. "Among the top 10 medical innovations greatest medical accomplishments in history was abortion. This is the one of the greatest medical accomplishments because it keeps small families." "Go to the website. Look at it. Fluorination, giving kids a toxin, and vaccines." There's a lot of trouble at CDC, and it's going to require getting rid of some people over the long term to change the institutional culture and bring back pride. "I'm very confident in the political staff that we have down there now that they're gonna be able to accomplish that and and ensure the competent functionality of that agency."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The recent resignation with the CDC, how are you ensuring that that agency is able to do a stop effectively? I would say this that first of all, I will confirm that we let go of Susan Menarie yesterday. I'm not gonna talk about personnel issues, but you know the CDC is an agency that is very troubled for a very long time and anybody who lives through the COVID pandemic and saw all of these bizarre recommendations that were not science based, all the information understands that the CDC has on its website today. Among the top 10 medical innovations greatest medical accomplishments in history was abortion. This is the one of the greatest medical accomplishments because it keeps small families. Go to the website. Look at it. Fluorination, giving kids a toxin, and vaccines. There's a lot of trouble at CDC, and it's going to require getting rid of some people over the long term in order for us to change the institutional culture and bring back pride and self esteem and make that agency the stellar agency that it's always been. I'm very confident in the political staff that we have down there now that they're gonna be able to accomplish that and and ensure the competent functionality of that agency.
Saved - September 1, 2025 at 10:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been exploring the unsettling history and current actions of the CDC, particularly in light of RFK Jr.'s recent firing of Susan Monarez. This reveals a long-standing agenda tied to eugenics and depopulation, with a focus on controversial practices like abortion and sterilization. I highlighted historical atrocities, including the Tuskegee Study and unethical sterilizations of marginalized groups. Today, I see alarming parallels in vaccine mandates and the agency's priorities. I plan to share a comprehensive report soon to delve deeper into these issues.

@sheislaurenlee - Lauren Lee

🚨 Is the CDC a DEATH CULT? RFK Jr.’s firing of Susan Monarez exposed what’s been hiding in plain sight for 100 years: A much darker agenda of eugenics, sterilization, and depopulation. The mask is finally DOWN. This is war — and it’s spiritual. 🧵 THREAD

@sheislaurenlee - Lauren Lee

Bookmark this one for future reference. 📌 What you’re about to read goes a lot deeper than money and corporate capture. This a CENTURY-long agenda of death, and I’m going to lay out the complete timeline for you. 👇

@sheislaurenlee - Lauren Lee

Last week RFK Jr. fired Susan Monarez, head of CDC. His comments spoke to this agenda exactly: “CDC has on its website today that among the top 10 greatest medical accomplishments in history was abortion (because it keeps small families), fluoridation (giving kids a toxin), and vaccines.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
I certainly consider mass shootings a health crisis and we are doing for the first time real studies to find out what the ideology of that is. And we're looking for the first time at psychiatric drugs. People have had guns in this country forever. There are many other countries that have comparable levels of guns that we have in this country. We had comparable levels in the forties, fifties, and sixties and people weren't doing that. Something changed and it dramatically changed human behavior. And one of the culprits we need to examine is whether the fact that we are the most over medicated nation in the world. And a lot of those are psychiatric drugs that have black box warnings on them that warn of suicidal and homicidal ideation. So we are doing those studies right now for the first time and we will have an answer.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I certainly consider mass shootings a health crisis and we are doing for the first time real studies to find out what the ideology of that is. And we're looking for the first time at psychiatric drugs. You know, he's kind of mad at you. People have had guns in this country forever. When I was a kid, we had shooting clubs at our school. People, kids, my classmates, other people would bring a 22 rifle with their guns to school and park it in the parking lot. Nobody was shooting. There's never been a time in America in the history of humanity and people walked into a crowd into a church or a movie theater or a school or a crowd of standards and just started randomly shooting. It's happening in our country. It's not happening around the world. And there are many other countries that have comparable levels of guns that we have in this country. We had comparable levels in the forties, fifties, and sixties and people weren't doing that. Something changed and it dramatically changed human behavior. And one of the culprits we need to examine is whether the fact that we are the most over medicated nation in the world. And a lot of those are psychiatric drugs that have black box warnings on them that warn of suicidal and homicidal ideation. So we are doing those studies right now for the first time and we will have an answer.

@sheislaurenlee - Lauren Lee

Abortions, mass poison, federal mandates… Those are our top priorities at CDC. And when you pull at this thread, you unravel a horrifying story. The people in charge seem to want more death, not life. So what is going on?

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

RFK Jr: “On the CDC's website right now they list the 10 greatest advances in medical science and one of them is abortion.” “The other is fluoridation and another is vaccines.” “So we need to look at the priorities of the agency.” “There's really a deeply embedded, I would say malaise at the agency.” “We need strong leadership that will go in there and that will be able to execute on President Trump's broad ambitions.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker critiques the CDC’s ranking of medical advances, stating: "Today on CDC's website, right now, they list the 10 top advances the 10 greatest advances in medical science, and one of them is abortion." He continues, "The other is another is flirtation, another is vaccines." He argues that we need to "look at the priorities of the agency" because there may be "a deeply, deeply embedded, I would say, malaise at the agency." He calls for "strong leadership that will go in there and that will be able to execute on president Trump's broad ambitions." Yeah. The overall message centers on agency priorities, alleged malaise, and the call for leadership to advance President Trump's broad ambitions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today on CDC's website, right now, they list the 10 top advances the 10 greatest advances in medical science, and one of them is abortion. The other is another is flirtation, another is vaccines. So we need to look at the priorities of the agency if there's really a deeply, deeply embedded, I would say, malaise at the agency. And we need strong leadership that will go in there and that will be able to execute on president Trump's broad ambitions. Yeah.

@sheislaurenlee - Lauren Lee

It might sound insane, but CDC’s roots are in eugenics. Before it was the CDC, it was the “U.S. Public Health Service,” which engaged in some of the most horrifying eugenics experiments of all time. 👇

@sheislaurenlee - Lauren Lee

For decades, USPHS ran programs that sterilized over 60,000 people deemed “unfit.” Targets included African Americans, Native Americans, Latinos, and the poor.

@sheislaurenlee - Lauren Lee

This wasn’t fringe. In 1927, the Supreme Court’s Buck v. Bell upheld sterilization laws. Justice Holmes infamously wrote: “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” That ruling was never overturned.

@sheislaurenlee - Lauren Lee

Then came Tuskegee (1932–1972): hundreds of black men deliberately left to die so “public health” could study their untreated syphilis.

@sheislaurenlee - Lauren Lee

Then, nearly 42% of Native American women were sterilized without informed consent.

@sheislaurenlee - Lauren Lee

By 1968, one-third of women in Puerto Rico were also sterilized in federally backed programs.

@sheislaurenlee - Lauren Lee

And let’s not forget Anthony Fauci’s committed heinous crimes against foster children, subjecting them to inhumane HIV “scientific experiments.” Children were dosed with experimental drug cocktails, inducing organ failure, rashes, stunted growth, agonizing pain, and death. When the helpless babies resisted, doctors restrained them. They forcibly inserted feeding tubes to continue pumping drugs in.

@sheislaurenlee - Lauren Lee

Today, it seems little has changed. RFK Jr. has already revealed the truth about multiple programs designed to disable and harm children. Mercury was INJECTED into babies for decades. Fluoride, now proven to lower IQ, is still pumped through our water. And aborted fetus death is celebrated as it’s “greatest achievement” of the last several decades.

@sheislaurenlee - Lauren Lee

Despite a 2012 study by Protecting Black Life claimed that 79% of Planned Parenthood's surgical abortion facilities were located within two miles of neighborhoods with higher-than-average Black or Hispanic populations, abortion continues to be pushed by the agency. Black women get 4x the number of abortions that white women do. Policymakers know this.

@sheislaurenlee - Lauren Lee

Then came 2020. The world’s greatest crime against humanity. Mandating a shot that was knowingly injuring and killing unknown amounts of people globally… particularly children. Reports show what Biden’s admin knew about Myocarditis in February 2021, but purposefully waited until June to warn people of “mild” heart damage. The result has been millions of affected families, all of which are still without compensation.

@sheislaurenlee - Lauren Lee

When pushed to release the data on Myocarditis, CDC covered it up. They redacted 100% of it. Remember this?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Disheartening, disgusting, and lots of other words, but then it gets better. It just keep wait. There's more. It just keeps happening. The CDC redacts every single word of a 148 page study on a myocarditis after COVID vaccination. So I asked research to print the study for me. 148 pages. The entire thing is redacted. What good does a study do if there's nothing there? Then I wanna know, wait, what might have been there that they needed to redact?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Disheartening, disgusting, and lots of other words, but then it gets better. It just keep wait. There's more. It just keeps happening. The CDC redacts every single word of a 148 page study on a myocarditis after COVID vaccination. So I asked research to print the study for me. 148 pages. The entire thing is redacted. What good does a study do if there's nothing there? Then I wanna know, wait, what might have been there that they needed to redact?

@sheislaurenlee - Lauren Lee

Who covered up that data? And why? Well, strap in. This is where actual Satanism enters the chat. 💀 I wish I was joking. 👇

@sheislaurenlee - Lauren Lee

The person in charge of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Dr. Demetre Daskalakis, would be responsible for clearly articulating the risks associated with any recommended or mandated vaccines. Unfortunately, he was a little busy dressing as the devil, engaging in elicit sexual activity, and posing for risqué photoshoots. He is a self-proclaimed Satanist.

@sheislaurenlee - Lauren Lee

After resigning last week, Demetre lamented the lack of objective science under RFK Jr.: “I am unable to serve in an environment that treats CDC as a tool to generate policies and materials that do not reflect scientific reality and are designed to hurt rather than to improve the public’s health.” Despite specifically rejecting objectivity in the past. “One person’s idea of risk is another person’s idea of a great Friday night!”

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Intentionally and making sure that we get the word out in a way that supports people's joy as opposed to, you know, calling them risky. One person's idea of risk is another person's idea of a great festival or Friday night for that matter. So we have to This framing stresses joyful, inclusive communication rather than labeling people as risky. It underlines that risk is subjective—a person's risk assessment can differ from another's view of a great event. The speaker suggests we should tailor messages to accommodate these differing perceptions and advance celebrations rather than stigmatizing risk. The implication is a need to harmonize diverse viewpoints when discussing social activities."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Intentionally and making sure that we get the word out in a way that supports people's joy as opposed to, you know, calling them risky. So I think, you know, one of the things to think about is that, you know, one person's idea of risk is another person's idea of a great festival or Friday night for that matter. So we have to

@sheislaurenlee - Lauren Lee

The man advocating for orgies was in charge of your child’s vaccines. “As above, so below.” What kind of culture not only allows a man like this to work in their institution, but to lead it?

@sheislaurenlee - Lauren Lee

We’re dealing with something far more sinister than a profit-scheme. This is clearly an agenda that treats human life as disposable, controllable, and unnecessary. So who, ultimately, is to blame?

@sheislaurenlee - Lauren Lee

There’s so much to expose here. Way more than I can put on X. I’ll be publishing my full report soon: the players, the population-control agenda, and the deeper ties to global networks of power. Sign up at http://sheislaurenlee.com to get it first. 🤝

lauren lee | Substack Click to read lauren lee, a Substack publication with hundreds of subscribers. sheislaurenlee.substack.com

@sheislaurenlee - Lauren Lee

Thank you so much for reading. Before we lose each other in the algorithm forever, shoot me a follow at @sheislaurenlee. 🤝 And if you appreciated this thread, please SHARE!👇

@sheislaurenlee - Lauren Lee

🚨 Is the CDC a DEATH CULT? RFK Jr.’s firing of Susan Monarez exposed what’s been hiding in plain sight for 100 years: A much darker agenda of eugenics, sterilization, and depopulation. The mask is finally DOWN. This is war — and it’s spiritual. 🧵 THREAD

@sheislaurenlee - Lauren Lee

PS - just realized I included the wrong clip for Kennedy’s quote about CDC priorities. Here is the corrected one for those interested. :) https://t.co/dd9KwCjxj1

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the CDC leadership, confirming 'we let go of Susan Menarie yesterday' and that the agency is 'a very troubled for a very long time' with 'bizarre recommendations that were not science based' during the COVID pandemic. They say 'Go to the website. Look at it. Fluorination, giving kids a toxin, and vaccines.' They add, 'There's a lot of trouble at CDC, and it's going to require getting rid of some people over the long term in order for us to change the institutional culture and bring back pride and self esteem and make that agency the stellar agency that it's always been.' They conclude, 'I'm very confident in the political staff that we have down there now that they're gonna be able to accomplish that and and ensure the competent functionality of that agency.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The recent resignation with the CDC, how are you ensuring that that agency is able to do a stop effectively? I would say this that first of all, I will confirm that we let go of Susan Menarie yesterday. I'm not gonna talk about personnel issues, but you know the CDC is an agency that is very troubled for a very long time and anybody who lives through the COVID pandemic and saw all of these bizarre recommendations that were not science based, all the information understands that the CDC has on its website today. Among the top 10 medical innovations greatest medical accomplishments in history was abortion. This is the one of the greatest medical accomplishments because it keeps small families. Go to the website. Look at it. Fluorination, giving kids a toxin, and vaccines. There's a lot of trouble at CDC, and it's going to require getting rid of some people over the long term in order for us to change the institutional culture and bring back pride and self esteem and make that agency the stellar agency that it's always been. I'm very confident in the political staff that we have down there now that they're gonna be able to accomplish that and and ensure the competent functionality of that agency.
Saved - December 7, 2025 at 12:30 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
ValerieAnne1970 shared a claim that Francis Boyle, who drafted bioweapons law, alleged SARS-CoV-2 and mRNA shots are DARPA-funded offensive bioweapons; Boyle died soon after agreeing to testify. @BullishlyFree accused Grok of rehashing lies and questioned Musk. @MagaDianna added that ChatGPT also denied the jabs as bioweapons. The thread centers on bioweapons claims, witness death, and concerns about corporate/government roles.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

Just days after Prof Francis Boyle agreed to testify against Bill Gates & Albert Bourla over the deadly COVID mRNA shots...he was FOUND DEAD. Boyle authored the US Bioweapons Act & called the mRNA injections 'Bioweapons & Franken-Shots.' Where does the Pentagon fit into this?... Just when you thought you’d heard it all, this resurfaced interview with Prof. Francis Boyle—the man who literally WROTE the 1989 Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act—will leave you speechless. He states on record that both SARS-CoV-2 and the mRNA injections were DARPA-funded offensive bioweapons programs from the start. Gain-of-function? That was the cover story. According to Boyle, the real goal was always “lethal yet vaccinate-able” population reduction tech. And yes, he names names: UNC, Wuhan, Fauci, Daszak, Baric…the whole club. He goes further—calls the shots “synthetic biological weapons of mass destruction” because they trigger autoimmune carnage, prion-like misfolding & turbo cancers. Boyle filed lawsuits, begged Congress & warned the world. Just 20 days after agreeing to testify for the prosecution, he was found dead. The same pattern we’ve seen with dozens of doctors & whistleblowers since 2020. Pure coincidence? If a man who drafted the actual law defining bioweapons says we just lived through the biggest biowarfare attack in history…why isn’t every news channel screaming this from the rooftops? The most chilling part? Boyle predicted exactly what we’re seeing now: myocarditis, strokes, infertility & cancers exploding in the injected. He said the spike protein itself is the weapon & the lipid nanoparticles were engineered to cross the blood-brain barrier. This wasn’t a mistake. It was a military-grade kill vector dressed up as “public health.” So here’s the question that keeps me up at night: Who gave the order? Who profits the most? And when do the Nuremberg-style trials begin?

@BullishlyFree - John Francis Backus

@ValerieAnne1970 @elonmusk Grok is re-telling the lies and not supporting the truth here. And Mr. Musk, you know this for a fact too. TY. https://t.co/RVysJ4wanL

@MagaDianna - 🇺🇸 The Truth Warrior

@BullishlyFree @ValerieAnne1970 @elonmusk So does ChatGPT. Got into an argument with it yesterday and it is STILL denying that the jabs are a bioweapon.

Saved - December 30, 2025 at 7:53 PM

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

The biggest story in history is unfolding right now, but few know about it: Dr. Francis Boyle died mysteriously right before he was set to testify against Bill Gates, Albert Bourla, et al saying the Covid jabs are bioweapons This case is about the extermination of our species! https://t.co/w68XG1di3Y

Video Transcript AI Summary
Professor Francis Boyle, a sixth witness, is described as an expert on bioweapons who drafted several bioweapons conventions related laws in the United States. Three weeks after he agreed to testify on behalf of the plaintiffs that the products and the process were deployments of bioweapons, he suddenly died. The cause of death remains unknown. He was in his mid-seventies, perfectly healthy prior, and teaching full time at the time of his death. His death is considered a shock to all involved, and the account states that it looks very suspicious to the speaker. The speaker emphasizes that they cannot speculate on what happened but urgently would like to know the cause of death. The speaker concludes with, “These people stop at nothing.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now there was a sixth witness, professor Francis Boyle, who is actually expert on bioweapons, having, drafted, bioweapons, you know, several bioweapons conventions related laws in The US. And three weeks after he agreed to testify on behalf of the plaintiffs that these products and the and the process was deployment of bioweapons, he suddenly died. And we still don't know the cause of death. And the only thing that we know is he was perfectly healthy prior and was teaching full time. He's in his mid he was in his mid seventies. And this was a shock to all of us. And we so this is this looks very suspicious to me. I, you know, I can't speculate on what happened, but I would really like to know the cause of death, and we don't know that. So that's where we are right now. This is how serious it is. These people stop at nothing.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Few know how incredible @PhdSansone is. He's the one who got Dr. Francis Boyle—the eminent lawyer who drafted the legislation for the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989—to submit a signed affidavit claiming that the Covid jabs are literal bioweapons (See tweets 2/3/4) https://t.co/ajPrBviFov

Video Transcript AI Summary
Pursuant to 28 USC seventeen forty six, I, Joseph Sanson, declare under penalty of perjury that the following statement is true to the best of my knowledge. I'm a psychotherapist with a bachelor's degree in psychology, a master's degree in clinical mental health counseling, and a PhD in psychology. I've been litigating here in Florida for over a year and a half to get the mRNA nanoparticle injections off the market because they're biological and technological weapons of mass destruction. In violation of Florida Statute 790.166, 18 USC 175 Chapter 10 Biological Weapons, as well as the Biological Weapons Convention, of course. I filed an affidavit in my case from Doctor. Francis Boyle, the law professor that wrote the Biological Weapons and Anti Terrorism Act of 1989. Doctor. Francis Boyle was arguably the world's leading legal authority on biological weapons. Doctor. Boyle clearly states in his affidavit that COVID injections and MRI nanoparticle injections are in violation of Florida Statute 790.166, Weapons of Mass Destruction, as well as 18 USC 175, Chapter 10, biological weapons. Keep in mind that the Biological Weapons and Anti Terrorism Act of 1989 was The US domestic implementation of the Biological Weapons Convention. I certify the authenticity of doctor Francis Boyle's affidavit as well as his intention to testify in this case that the COVID injections and and mRNA injections are biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Pursuant to 28 USC seventeen forty six, I, Joseph Sanson, declare under penalty of perjury that the following statement is true to the best of my knowledge. I'm a psychotherapist with a bachelor's degree in psychology, a master's degree in clinical mental health counseling, and a PhD in psychology. I've been litigating here in Florida for over a year and a half to get the mRNA nanoparticle injections off the market because they're biological and technological weapons of mass destruction. In violation of Florida Statute 790.166, 18 USC 175 Chapter 10 Biological Weapons, as well as the Biological Weapons Convention, of course. I filed an affidavit in my case from Doctor. Francis Boyle, the law professor that wrote the Biological Weapons and Anti Terrorism Act of 1989. Doctor. Francis Boyle was arguably the world's leading legal authority on biological weapons. Doctor. Boyle clearly states in his affidavit that COVID injections and MRI nanoparticle injections are in violation of Florida Statute 790.166, Weapons of Mass Destruction, as well as 18 USC 175, Chapter 10, biological weapons. Keep in mind that the Biological Weapons and Anti Terrorism Act of 1989 was The US domestic implementation of the Biological Weapons Convention. I certify the authenticity of doctor Francis Boyle's affidavit as well as his intention to testify in this case that the COVID injections and and mRNA injections are biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction.
Saved - August 30, 2024 at 1:57 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that a DOJ lawyer has acknowledged the FDA's actions against Ivermectin were a mistake and an abuse of authority. They stated that the FDA overstepped its boundaries by making recommendations on drug usage, which is the practice of medicine. The controversy surrounding the FDA's "horse medicine" tweets has led to significant consequences. I also discovered the doctors who successfully challenged the FDA's actions, highlighting their victory against government overreach.

@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas

🚨BREAKING: DOJ Lawyer ADMITS FDA War Against Ivermect*n was a Mistake, Abuse of Authority, After Doctors Sue Government and Win “So, what the FDA has done... [is] unquestionably beyond its authority.” “Making a recommendation of what drugs to take or not to take, that’s the practice of medicine. And FDA can’t practice medicine.” The FDA’s “horse medicine” tweets caused a deadly chain reaction - meet the Doctors (@MdBreathe, @RobertApter1) who were victorious against @US_FDA @HHSGov tyranny. #FDATweets

Video Transcript AI Summary
The FDA faced criticism for its public messaging against Ivermectin, a drug used for deworming, during the COVID pandemic. Some argued that the FDA's tweets, stating "you are not a horse," were part of a broader agenda to promote vaccines. A lawsuit challenged the FDA's authority to advise against Ivermectin, highlighting that the agency should not dictate medical practices. Despite settling the case and removing the tweets, the FDA did not change its stance on Ivermectin. Advocates claim the drug is safe and effective, contrasting it with the adverse effects of vaccines. This case has reportedly damaged the FDA's credibility, emphasizing that it should not dictate patient treatment options.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I did have a case. Do you remember the only thing done at FDA issued some tweets that said, you're not a horse. You're not a cow. I do remember that. Shutter with liammectin? Yes. But they were sued over that. Did you defend them in that? I did. I was somewhat successful. I actually read my case when they appealed, and the dividend of the hymn of the appeal was awful. They really shouldn't be saying, don't think this drug. They often use something like tweets as, like, a BFO to pursue a broader agenda. Speaker 1: What's behind the agenda? I don't know. But it's it's evil. Speaker 2: I do think it was a purposeful, coordinated attack into PR to get the shot in every arm. Talk to your doctor, not not the government agency. Speaker 1: Well, they put out that tweet. That was probably the most successful public relations campaign that any health agency ever did. Speaker 3: The Food and Drug Administration had to put out an unusual warning to Americans this week. They tweeted, quote, you are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y'all. Stop it. They're talking about people who've been using Ivermectin, a drug usually used for deworming horses and livestock to treat COVID 19. Speaker 4: During the COVID pandemic, propaganda, deceit, and fear were rampant. But when a cheap Nobel Prize winning wonder drug began to emerge as a hopeful treatment, the media, the government, and big pharma went to war against it. The FDA launched a public relations attack campaign against the drug, spreading the horse medicine lie. That is, until a group of doctors sued the FDA and one restricting the agency's ability to act as America's doctor. In today's Project Veritas undercover report, Speaker 0: The most legitimate problem with the FDA again, an agency could only do what has statutory authorization today. Like, FDA can only do what Congress said it can do. That's it. The argument was that FDA didn't have authority to tell people not to take a certain step. It's okay for FDA to read the information off of them, but it's not okay to take the next step and actually tell people you should not take this step, Because making a record, there's no red flags to take or not to take. That's the practice of medicine. The FDA can't practice medicine. Speaker 1: He acknowledges that the FDA was out of line. Well, I've practiced emergency medicine for over 40 years, and I retired from that in July of 2020. I've done more than 15,000 patient consultations for COVID. However, treating with ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine went against the government narrative. So the government's apparent agenda since the start of this has been to force everybody regardless of whether it makes any sense to get the these COVID so called vaccines, which we now know are poison jabs. Speaker 0: So So how do the immediacy feel then? So what the legion has done is is, like, only beyond the pale of the flight. There is no authority whatsoever to do that, But unfortunately, the honest authority. Speaker 2: One thing that struck me at both cases is how immature and inexperienced the lawyers were for the FDA. Speaker 1: Well, we did we settled the case, but we settled it largely on our terms. They had to take down the offensive tweets and the offending public relations campaign. Unfortunately, they didn't really change their policy about Ivermectin, and I'm still faced with fighting the medical boards and the licensing boards over my license for using Ivermectin for COVID in spite of the fact that they haven't been able to identify a single patient that has a complaint against me or a single adverse outcome. Speaker 2: Now I've treated over 6,000 COVID patients, And I can say none of my patients have been hospitalized because of using Ivermectin contrary to, what Isaac, reports in that video. It's one of the safest medications I've ever used. I have far more problems with people calling me about side effects from antibiotics than I do from Ivermectin. Speaker 0: And they also, like, they got a Hynae that was good for them. That kind of eliminated FDA's priority. Oh, so they got a good result, like, from the courts. They really wanted more. But the ones that got an opinion, so it's good for them. So once they got that opinion, the actual tweets don't really care that much about. Because, like, they'll often use something like tweets as, like, a via vault to pursue a broader agenda going forward, but put them being a bit more careful. They they really shouldn't be saying, don't take this drug. What they should say, which isn't that different, but it's safe for us. They should say, this drug can be very dangerous. Like, provide information. See, like, this drug is dangerous. There's no evidence to show that it works, but there is evidence that it can be very harmful. You could die from this drug. That's all fine. Just don't take the next step of saying the recommendation, don't take this drug. That's like one step you have. Speaker 1: Well, ivermectin is one of the safest medications that we prescribe. It's demonstrably safer than Tylenol or aspirin or Ibuprofen. In fact, there haven't been any documented cases of death from overdose of Ivermectin, pure overdose. Bringing some of these, topics to to a new audience, I think, is worthwhile. You know, the how effective early treatment was suppressed and hundreds of thousands of lives were caused because of that, and how the, agenda has been to push a harmful vaccine that's caused, again, at least 100 of thousands of excess deaths in this country, increased disability by 1,000,000. It it it's it's, important to keep bringing this forward. And I think there needs to be accountability. There needs to be some wholesale change in our public health approach in this country. So there are only 2 countries in the world where direct advertising of prescription medicines to consumers is allowed. That's New Zealand and the States. Big Pharma got that, approval to do that, not just because they wanna sell drugs, probably even more than that because they want to be a major source of funding for the media, which they are. So they basically control the message that the media gives out because they've got the money. Speaker 2: One thing this case did is set a precedent. I think it permanently tarnished the reputation of the FDA. I think the public will takes the FDA a little less seriously now, and it keeps them from making the same bold, reckless move in the future when it comes to telling patients what they can and cannot do. Like, Isaac said and like we have all said, the FDA is not your doctor. The FDA has no business, telling patients what they can take, and, we proved in court of law that, they cannot do that.
View Full Interactive Feed