reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - February 10, 2025 at 3:27 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've shared insights on various health topics, emphasizing the dangers of certain vitamins and supplements, particularly vitamin A, which I argue is toxic and linked to numerous health issues. I've discussed how toxicities and deficiencies can affect conditions like cancer, diabetes, and fertility. I also highlighted the misconceptions surrounding coffee, vitamin D, and the effects of birth control on health. My goal is to provide evidence-based information to help others make informed health choices and avoid common pitfalls in nutrition and wellness.

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

By popular demand… Here are my “Best of the Best” threads that expose… The dangers of “vitamins” The problem with “health foods” The poisons being sold as “essential” Plus, discover a few ways to start slowly turning your health around today! Happy reading!

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

What they aren’t telling you about Cancer…

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

Learn more about cancer (CA) in this thread I'm going to go over how the liver & toxic bile are completely connected to CA See tweet below This is sort of correct, read on to FULLY understand it You're going to want to RT this first tweet to spread it... 🧵

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

What nursing mothers need to know about breastfeeding…

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON IN THE BODY WITH THE C-VIRUS Look at the pics first please Nursing mother, either diagnosed C+ OR exposed to C+ people You will not hear this explanation anywhere else I'm not going to argue germ theory here, it's irrelevant /// THREAD ///

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

The hard truth when it comes to coffee…

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

THE SIMPLE REALITY OF COFFEE / CAFFEINE Before starting a coffee/caffeine habit, you weren't more tired if you *didn't* have it You also didn't have withdrawal sides like headaches if you missed your dose Accept coffee/caffeine is a drug first /// THREAD ///

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

Vitamin E is NOT your friend. Here’s why…

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

"The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) has issued recommendations against the use of 2 nutritional supplements to prevent cardiovascular disease & cancer. They are beta-carotene & vitamin E. Specifically, beta-carotene even has the risk of causing cancer." ///Thread

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

This raises Vitamin D better than Vitamin D supplements (Hint: not sunlight)…

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

Having trouble raising your Vit D levels? Find you feel WORSE taking Vit D pills? Check this thread FB comment: "Yes, when I was at my sickest my vit d level was really low. My dr couldn’t believe it because I was taking cod liver oil and lots of high vit d foods. 🤢" [cont]

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

The “vitamin” destroying your testosterone…

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

Want to optimize your hormones? PAY ATTENTION TO THIS THREAD "Animal Vit A" damages testosterone-producing Sertoli cells: Retinol supplementation induces oxidative stress & modulates antioxidant enzyme activities in rat sertoli cells https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11328675/ There's more! 🧵

Retinol supplementation induces oxidative stress and modulates antioxidant enzyme activities in rat sertoli cells - PubMed Recent intervention studies revealed that supplementation with retinoids resulted in a higher incidence of lung cancer. Recently the causal mechanism has begun to be clarified. We report here that retinol caused cellular oxidative stress and modulated superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione p … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

Tolerate blue light better by removing this…

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

HOW BLUE LIGHT DAMAGES THE EYE Blue light is a hot topic these days Vitamin A toxicity is becoming a hot topic too, with at least 1/3 of Americans legit victims of it Did you know that the two are intricately connected? 🧵THREAD🧵

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

What’s worse? Natural or Synthetic vitamin A? You might be surprised…

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

Many claim that natural & "synthetic" forms of vitamin A (vA) are different...they say: - Natural forms are not toxic & synthetic is - Somehow, even though they are CHEMICALLY IDENTICAL, they function vastly differently They are quite wrong, I'll show you in research here 🧵

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

Beware of this “known poison” being sold as a health supplement…

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

If you want to help others, please RT the first tweet of this thread! Video of what is covered here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sa9Gzp-alYU This thread is NOT debating the fact that HUMANS need SUNLIGHT (and/or UV-B light at minimum) to be healthy

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

Got insulin resistance? Dump this compound for better health…

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

LOWERING TOXIC COPPER IN DIABETIC MICE IMPROVED THEIR INSULIN RESISTANCE Straightforward...using a molybdenum compound to lower toxic copper & CORRECT DIABETES. Whodathunkit??? Role of copper ion in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19461160/ / / / THREAD / / /

Role of copper ion in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes - PubMed Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are induced under diabetic conditions and are likely associated with the development of type 2 diabetes. It is also known that ROS production is facilitated in the presence of copper ion through the Fenton reaction. The aim of this study was to examine the involvement o … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

For better bone health, dump this supplement NOW…

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

Why you should stop poisoning yourself & your kids with toxic cod liver oil aka CLO (& fish oils, for that matter) Chances are, you've never seen the research I'm going to drop on you Once you realize the mistake, don't be too hard on yourself, move forward & throw it AWAY 🧵

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

The fertility fix…

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

Ladies (men too!) who have issues w FERTILITY, listen up I get people SO HEALTHY that I warn them to be diligent if they DON'T want more kids Friday on my livestream I'll cover a testimonial from 40-y/o woman who slipped 1X in her measures & is now pregnant I fix fertility 🧵

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

How women (and men) can become “Dangerously Fertile”...

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

Men, pay attention. 46 years old, not on ANY hormones, 2 kids, full time business owner My total testosterone just clocked in at 893.5 ng/dL (normal range given: 264 - 916) I think it is safe to infer that I know what the heck I'm talking about in regards to health 🧵

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

These are bad arguments for good skin…

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

Humans do not need retinol, carotenoids, or "Vit A" for anything I regularly fix chronic disease by getting people OFF as much food-based Vit A in their diets as possible (supplements only add more to the problem) Want to see evidence Vit A is absolutely toxic to your skin? 🧵

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

Misreading this blood test will make things MUCH worse…

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

A LOW "BLOOD VITAMIN A" TEST MEANS NEXT TO NOTHING, & FATTY LIVER IS A VITAMIN A TOXICITY CONDITION If you think getting a serum retinol ("blood Vitamin A") test is going to show if you are vitamin A toxic or not, you are sadly mistaken...and I've said this over and over. 🧵

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

#1 food that DESTROYS your fertility…

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

Infertililty is absolutely the goal of these people, see image below I fix infertility ALL THE TIME Let me help everyone see how they have induced infertility in plain sight They tell you in the research and in their chosen "drugs" how they do it Follow me here... 🧵

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

Got age spots? Here’s how to get rid of them…

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

Want to know what causes "age spots" aka lipofuscin, and how to get rid of them? The cause is Vit A (retinal, aka retinaldehyde) The solution is to minimize Vit A (all of it) Need to see the proof? 🧵

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

The foods to avoid for optimal health…

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

The Basics Of A Low Poison Diet Once one accepts Vit A is a poison, here are the foods to reduce / minimize / avoid: Animal foods: - Liver & organ meats - Egg yolks - Dairy - Pork (contains retinoic acid, doesn't show up on Vit A testing) Plant foods next 🧵

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

The “vitamin” proven to make your child sick…

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

New study on the poison called "Vitamin A"! Higher levels of serum retinol (blood Vit A) in Chinese children linked to: - Metabolic syndrome - General obesity - High LDL - High total cholesterol - High uric acid (related to gout) I'm here to help you stop poisoning yourself 🧵

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

Beware of eating the most poisonous part of the animal…

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

PART 2: Are you STILL eating the filter + sewage treatment plant of the body, aka LIVER? PART 1: Continuing where we left off, covering case studies of human poisonings from consuming animal livers of all types (fish, chicken, beef) 🧵

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

Organ meats store toxins, are toxic, and CAUSE DISEASE

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

Warning! Are you still eating TOXIC organ meats? In this thread, I'll cover the evidence that ALL organ meats, including wild, grassfed, and conventional animals are filled w toxins This thread may save your life RT to help people stop poisoning themselves!

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

Learn the toxicities & deficiencies are behind your low Testosterone levels & depression... You don't have a TRT deficiency https://mobile.twitter.com/NutriDetect/status/1589305585639608321

Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith (@NutriDetect) on X MEN...you DON'T have to take Testosterone Replacement Therapy (TRT) to fix your depression & low T levels! What you have is a combo of TOXICITIES & DEFICIENCIES TRT is a band-aid cover-up It does *nothing* to fix the problems I'll cover in this /thread/ RT this & HELP MEN mobile.twitter.com

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

MEN...you DON'T have to take Testosterone Replacement Therapy (TRT) to fix your depression & low T levels! What you have is a combo of TOXICITIES & DEFICIENCIES TRT is a band-aid cover-up It does *nothing* to fix the problems I'll cover in this /thread/ RT this & HELP MEN

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

PolyCystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) has distinct toxicity & deficiency patterns I help ppl fix every day https://mobile.twitter.com/NutriDetect/status/1587210730528559104

Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith (@NutriDetect) on X How To Correct PCOS (Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome) Do you have this issue, or know someone who does? It can be fixed It is a combo of COMMON toxicities and mineral deficiencies I test for & address daily Let me walk you through it RT this to help the women in your life mobile.twitter.com

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

How To Correct PCOS (Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome) Do you have this issue, or know someone who does? It can be fixed It is a combo of COMMON toxicities and mineral deficiencies I test for & address daily Let me walk you through it RT this to help the women in your life

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

The myth that "K2 protects you from D3" HINT: You shouldn't need "protecting" from a vitamin!

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

There is a myth that taking K2 will protect you from vit D3 calcifying you into a statue...this is NOT true: "progression in aortic & coronary artery calcification score was NOT significantly different bw patients treated w MK-7 + vit D & patients receiving placebo. 🧵

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

The "carrots are bullsh-t" thread:

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

Are you *still* eating carrots? We were all LIED TO about the supposed "benefits" of carrots, and have been for a very long time I'm going to take you on a ride through the deceptive health history of the carrot / thread /

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

Irrefutable evidence of the worldwide "vitamin" A toxicity epidemic:

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

The Worldwide "vitamin" A Toxicity Epidemic: What I Learned By Looking At Gold-Standard *Liver Biopsy* Studies Bold statement, right? Yes, it's happening. Yes, I'll show research No, it does NOT show up in blood tests It shows up in the liver itself SHARE THIS / thread / 👇

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

The real facts on tattoos, toxicity, and health:

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

Why Tattoos Make People Sick & Send Them To Early Graves Most people haven't looked into the research on tattoos I have. It's ugly. Real ugly Do what you choose to do, I just provide information Hopefully you'll reconsider getting any (more) done after this / thread / 👇

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

Why is "vitamin" A Bill Gates' favorite vitamin, and why does he support giving it away for free?

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

Bill Gates, Population Control, & "vitamin" A: What We Can Learn By Following His MONEY$$$ Many are familiar w this "man" 😉 & his goals for humanity Did you know "vit" A is a CRUCIAL part of his approaches? What does HE know about it that YOU don't? SHARE THIS / thread /

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

Here's the info about eggs that no one ever told you...

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

Why Too Many EGGS May Be Shortening Your Life (HINT: It's NOT The Cholesterol!) Eggs are a fave food in Twitter-land, w ppl claiming they're 1 of the healthiest foods If you're open-minded, you need to see this research Then ask why you've never seen it before / thread / 👇

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

What if "vitamin" A wasn't actually essential at all?

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

"vitamin" A Deficiency Doesn't Exist: What I Learned By Examining Human Studies It is claimed that "vit" A is *essential* & required thru diet That said, if even *1* person can be healthy w/o any of it, then it's NOT essential Let us explore this topic IN DETAIL / thread /

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

If cosmetics ingredients were associated with increased cancer & death, you'd want to know, right?

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

LADIES (especially), are you interested in NOT ruining your health with toxic cosmetics? Then you want to read this / thread / & SHARE IT Questions: Is topical "vitamin" A a contributor to "vit" A toxicity? Is topical "vit" A connected to CANCER & DEATH? 😬🤭😱 👇

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

The *fat-soluble* factor in the OBESITY epidemic that no one ever told you about...

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

How "vitamin" A is a MAJOR cause of the OBESITY epidemic I guarantee you've NEVER heard of this connection before We'll go into the science, as we always do Buckle up, buttercup SHARE THIS to help others / thread / 👇

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

The real root cause of diabetes & metabolic syndrome that no one else is talking about...

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

WARNING! Is eating "healthy" putting you on the fast track to diabetes? Did you know there is TONS of research linking "vitamin" A to diabetes? Why weren't you ever told this by the health goo-roos? I'm here to correct this oversight now / thread / 🧵👇

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

Alzheimer's & dementia...their connections to this toxic so-called "vitamin":

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

How vitamin A TOXICITY is connected to Alzheimers & dementia These are terrible diseases of our modern era "mOdErN mEdIcAl ScIeNcE" ➡️ ZERO progress on figuring it out What if it's connected to toxicity of a so-called "vitamin"? Don't forget 😉 to RT this / thread / 👇

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

How to make vitamin D and avoid taking rat poison D3 if you live in a low sun area:

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

Live Somewhere With Little Sun? Pay Attention. Supplemental Vitamin D3 Pills are Literal Rat Poison (Seriously!) You want to raise your blood vitamin D levels, but… taking D3 pills is a BAD idea. Here’s what you can do instead and get the LIGHT you need…

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

The 2 mineral deficiencies and 1 "vitamin" toxicity that will help fix your vitamin D levels:

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

There are Multiple Things You Should Do to Boost Your Vit D Levels Without Damaging Your Health But Did You Know that These Things Can Improve Your Health in Other Areas? Here’s How You Can Boost Your Vitamin D Without Taking RAT POISON (Vit D3 Supplements)

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

My MEGA-THREAD on how to fix your vit D levels without having to take actual rat poison

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

The Nutrition Detective "How To Fix Vit D WITHOUT Taking Rat Poison Pills" MEGA Thread I cover: - Why you don't want to take D3 or D2 supps - How to use LIGHT to ⬆️ D levels - Taint-sunning science - How TOXICITIES & DEFICIENCIES affect D levels Let us begin 👇

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

"vitamin" A causes cataracts:

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

"vitamin" A Causes Cataracts: Connecting the Real-World Evidence ~6 yrs ago the CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Company) came out with this ~5 min video segment on people in China w cataracts getting free surgeries, ORIGINAL version here (this becomes important later): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRFbUHcCRCo Quoted from 0:26 in: "For an aging rural population w the highest number of cataract sufferers in the world. No one knows exactly how many in China, though it's well in the tens of millions." You'll note the patients have many liver/age spots, bad skin in general, & most seem to have an orangish tint to their skin. Liver/age spots are lipofuscin accumulation, which is caused by toxic "vit" A accumulation, see my threads: The orange-ish skin is from excessive carotenoids aka "plant vitamin A" accumulating in their skin and subcutaneous fat Lipofuscin accumulates in the eye, and remember that retinyl is "vit" A: "Lipofuscin is a fluorescent material with significant phototoxic potential that accumulates with age in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) of the eye. It is thought to be a factor in retinal degeneration diseases. The most extensively characterized lipofuscin component, N-retinylidene-N-retinylethanolamine (A2E)" https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22417141/ Where might all this "vit" A come about in their diets? 🤔 Key quote from 4:07 in: "His mother dries sweet potatoes by the fire for dinner, it's the only vegetable they can grow here." Wouldn't it be strange then if someone in the Canadian media edited out the connection between very high-"vit" A food consumption a la sweet potatoes and the population with the world's highest rates of cataracts? Watch the same video on the CBC website, jump to 4:00 mark and watch the same part, watch for the change: https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/1131719747560 It has been edited to say: "...potatoes by the fire for dinner, it's the only vegetable they can grow here." Someone found it important enough to go back and edit out "His mother dries SWEET..." Those who know would call this lying by omission For those of you who are familiar w excessive blue light damaging the eyes, make sure to see my thread here about how blue light ONLY causes eye DAMAGE when "vit" A is PRESENT: Such a strange bunch of coincidences, yes? Share this important information with those you know who have eye issues!

Lipofuscin and A2E accumulate with age in the retinal pigment epithelium of Nrl-/- mice - PubMed Lipofuscin is a fluorescent material with significant phototoxic potential that accumulates with age in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) of the eye. It is thought to be a factor in retinal degeneration diseases. The most extensively characterized lipofuscin component, N-retinylidene-N-retinyleth … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

Connecting #toxicbiletheory to white lung syndrome, pneumonia, and COVID:

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

My opinion on the pneumonia that is the new scary white lung syndrome It is simply another variation of toxic bile and its common toxic constituents leaking into the bloodstream and causing problems systemically (lungs definitely included). I'll hit on the major points Let us start with #toxicbiletheory Are bile markers higher in the blood in pneumonia? Yes "The present study indicates that elevation of serum bilirubin and of blood urea are both common accompaniments of pneumonia [...] In Port Moresby, pneumonia remains the commonest cause of jaundice among patients admitted to the medical wards" https://sci-hub.st/10.1111/j.1445-5994.1974.tb03202.x Remember, bilirubin is BILE-irubin, and high bilirubin is one of many potential markers of excess bile in the blood. Bile in the blood is BAD Babies born to mothers who have excess bile in their blood (intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy) can get pneumonia from the bile in their own blood: "Bile acids are detectable in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of newborns from intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy affected by respiratory distress syndrome. Elevated serum bile acid levels in these infants allow us to hypothesize that bile acid reaches the lung after an uptake from the circulation. These findings strongly support a role for bile acid in causing bile acid pneumonia." https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article-abstract/121/1/e146/71033/Bile-Acid-Induced-Lung-Injury-in-Newborn-Infants-A?redirectedFrom=fulltext More connecting bile and pneumonia: "TBAs [total bile acids] on admission were significantly higher in ICU patients compared to controls. TBAs were 3x higher in septic than cardiogenic shock patients and 6x higher than in surgical patients and controls as shown in Table 2. [...] Hyperbilirubinemia (serum bilirubin ≥ 2 mg within 48 h of admission) was observed more often in patients with septic shock (33%) compared to cardiogenic shock (21%) and patients after surgery (5%)." We connected bile acids in the blood to sepsis, now we connect sepsis to pneumonia: "Most common causes of sepsis were pneumonia (46%)..." https://annalsofintensivecare.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13613-017-0272-7 They're so close, they just have their cause-and-effects in the wrong order. It's the BILE causing the sepsis AND pneumonia, because you AREN'T SUPPOSED TO HAVE TOXIC BILE IN YOUR BLOOD. Sepsis and pneumonia are SYMPTOMS caused by the toxic bile, see? It so happens that a side effect of the oral "medication" UDCA, a secondary bile acid (the most toxic kinds) that is directly related to the supplement TUDCA, is PNEUMONIA: ""Unanticipated" UDCA toxicity includes hepatitis, pruritus, cholangitis, ascites, vanishing bile duct syndrome, liver cell failure, death, severe watery diarrhea, pneumonia, dysuria, immune-suppression, mutagenic effects and withdrawal syndrome upon sudden halt." Toxic bile will contain toxic copper and toxic "vitamin" A, and both these toxins will deplete zinc. Can we find this copper & zinc pattern in the blood in pneumonia? "In middle-aged and older Finnish men, increased serum Cu/Zn-ratio and Cu concentrations are each linearly associated with an increased risk of incident pneumonia." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35781862/ Did you know that one of the COMMON side effects of giving people "active vitamin A" aka retinoic acid, as CHEMOTHERAPY, is pneumonia? Remember, the body dumps toxic "vitamin" A into the bile: "Formerly referred to as retinoic acid syndrome, differentiation syndrome is a common and potentially life-threatening complication seen in patients with APML treated with ATRA [all-trans retinoic acid aka "active vitamin A"] and/or ATO [arsenic trioxide, another poison] therapy. The clinical features of differentiation syndrome are also observed with other complications (i.e., sepsis, fluid overload, pulmonary hemorrhage, pneumonia, renal failure, and congestive heart failure)." https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/nursing-and-health-professions/retinoic-acid-syndrome Also make sure to read this amazing paper by Anthony Mawson, titled: Liver Damage and Exposure to Toxic Concentrations of Endogenous Retinoids in the Pathogenesis of COVID-19 Disease: Hypothesis "We propose that SARS-CoV-2 virus-induced liver damage causes retinoic acid and stored retinyl esters to be released into the circulation in toxic concentrations, unbound to protein, with resulting damage to organs including the lungs, heart, blood vessels, and skin. Several lines of evidence support this model of disease causation." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33983857/ The only question left in my mind is, what is triggering the massive toxic bile dump? I still absolutely think that EMF is a huge suspect in this mess, and you can see my video on it here with the references: https://youtube.com/live/Y2fNwCaW-Bs?feature=share So there you go

Circulating bile acids predict outcome in critically ill patients - Annals of Intensive Care Jaundice and cholestatic hepatic dysfunction are frequent findings in critically ill patients associated with increased mortality. Cholestasis in critically ill patients is closely associated with stimulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines resulting in impaired bile secretion and subsequent accumulation of bile acids. Aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical role of circulating bile acids in critically ill patients. Total and individual serum bile acids were assessed via high-performance liquid chromatography in 320 critically ill patients and 19 controls. Total serum bile acids were threefold higher in septic than cardiogenic shock patients and sixfold higher than in post-surgical patients or controls (p < 0.001). Elevated bile acid levels correlated with severity of illness, renal dysfunction and inflammation (p < 0.05). Total bile acids predicted 28-day mortality independently of sex, age, serum bilirubin and severity of illness (HR 1.041, 95% CI 1.013–1.071, p < 0.005). Best prediction of mortality of total bile acids was seen in patients suffering from septic shock. Individual and total BAs are elevated by various degrees in different shock conditions. BAs represent an early predictor of short-term survival in a mixed cohort of ICU patients and may serve as marker for early risk stratification in critically ill patients. Future studies should elucidate whether modulation of BA metabolism and signalling influences the clinical course and outcome in critically ill patients. annalsofintensivecare.springeropen.com
Serum copper-to-zinc ratio and risk of incident pneumonia in caucasian men: a prospective cohort study - PubMed Serum copper (Cu) and zinc (Zn), essential micronutrients that have important immunomodulatory and antimicrobial properties, are biomarkers of ageing. Serum Cu/Zn-ratio may be a more reliable marker for age-related degenerative conditions compared with serum Cu or Zn alone. We aimed to assess the as … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Retinoic Acid Syndrome - an overview | ScienceDirect TopicsScienceDirect sciencedirect.com
Liver Damage and Exposure to Toxic Concentrations of Endogenous Retinoids in the Pathogenesis of COVID-19 Disease: Hypothesis - PubMed Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has a marked tropism for the biliary tract; it damages the bile ducts and hepatocytes and can lead to liver decompensation, cirrhosis, and sepsis. The pathogenesis of liver damage and its association with damage to the lung, heart, and bra … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

What drives a fever? Hint, it's not pathogens:

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

Fevers are not what you've been told Fevers are massive dumps of toxic bile leaking into the bloodstream and causing havoc in the system, see below See "bilious fever", a concept that has been around since the 18th century: "The term...was used by medical practitioners in the 18th and 19th centuries for any fever that exhibited the symptom of nausea or vomiting in addition to an increase in internal body temperature and strong diarrhea, which were thought to arise from disorders of bile, the two types of which were two of the four humours of traditional Galenic medicine." [nausea and vomiting are caused by bile getting into the stomach] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilious_fever What is known to happen when bile leaks into the bloodstream? "The clinical presentation of a patient with a postoperative biliary leak may include right upper quadrant pain, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, and fever." [there's the nausea & vomiting again!] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5088090/ Boy, the above sure sounds like "the flu aka Coofid" to me! NO VIRUSES NECESSARY, only toxic bile going in large amounts into places it ISN'T supposed to be! Galen put forth that disease was related to bile disorders around 200 AD Studies on the toxicity of bile in the blood were done BY THE ROCKEFELLER INSTITUTE way back in 1905 & 1906, why have you never heard of this? (you should know why 😉): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2124573/pdf/280.pdf https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2124605/pdf/127.pdf Your health issues have always been related to your liver and #toxicbile, and we are the only ones focusing on fixing it See my Love Your Liver livestreams #53 & #71 to get caught up on this new paradigm of chronic disease: https://www.youtube.com/@NutritionDetective/streams

Bilious fever - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Diagnosis and Management of Postoperative Biliary Leaks Postoperative biliary leaks have become more common in the past three decades since the development of laparoscopic biliary surgery. The role of the radiologist and interventional radiologist is important in the diagnosis and treatment of such ... pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Nutrition Detective This is the YouTube channel of Dr. Garrett Smith, the Nutrition Detective. Dr. Smith is the foremost expert on the worldwide epidemics of Vitamin A toxicity... youtube.com

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

My take on toxic "vitamin" A, ceruloplasmin, and Morley's mistake:

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

Let me explain how Morley Robbins and his "protocol" are wrong on ceruloplasmin production supposedly requiring the toxin called "vitamin" A Morley and his minions constantly say that natural and “synthetic” forms of “vitamin” A are completely different in function. This is entirely unsupported in science and is a classic Appeal to Nature fallacy If science uses the same chemical processes to identify natural and synthetic forms of "vitamin" A, then they have the EXACT SAME STRUCTURE and would therefore express the EXACT SAME FUNCTION. This should seem obvious, or else one has a lot of proving to do to show they are different in function even while they are exactly the same in structure. Let's see them do that I thoroughly demonstrate that there is ZERO DIFFERENCE in the toxic effects of natural and synthetic “vitamin” A in this thread: His group will deny any study as garbage that doesn’t use “natural vitamin A", but when it serves their narrative, they'll quote the study and just ignore the hypocrisy First, you should know that ceruloplasmin, a COPPER-BINDING PROTEIN (it protects us from toxic free copper) is an ACUTE PHASE REACTANT, which means it goes UP in INFLAMMATORY STATES. I say that copper and "vitamin" A are both toxic. This will be a coincidence you don't want to forget What type of "vitamin" A is commonly used in the studies he quotes to show “vitamin” A is necessary for ceruloplasmin production? Hint: not "natural"! Let me go over some of the research in short: Giving rats *synthetic* ACCUTANE aka 13-cis retinoic acid raised ceruloplasmin https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3655940/ Second study, giving rats *synthetic* ACCUTANE aka 13-cis-retinoic acid raised ceruloplasmin https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9202972/ So giving *synthetic* ACCUTANE aka "active vitamin A" to rats increases the ACUTE PHASE REACTANT called CERULOPLASMIN that would typically go up in INFLAMMATORY STATES. Interesting, no? Before we go into the next part, you may want to read my thread here on how "vitamin" A deficiency (natural or synthetic) DOESN'T EXIST: Now, if their stance on "vitamin" A and ceruloplasmin is true, shouldn't "vitamin A deficiency" cause ceruloplasmin to GO DOWN? Is that what actually happens? Rat liver cells: "The intracellular concentrations of albumin and ceruloplasmin were not significantly altered by vitamin A deficiency." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6337857/ No changes in ceruloplasmin with "vit" A deficiency? "Concentrations of ceruloplasmin...are increased in the serum of vitamin-A-deficient rats compared to normal rats." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6859810/ Wait, "vit" A deficiency caused ceruloplasmin to go UP? (if you see my thread above and my comment below, I don't think the rat diets were actually low in "vit" A at all) "The ceruloplasmin level of control animals and vitamin A-deficient rats was determined. An average increase between 22 and 33% was observed in the animals with vitamin A deficiency, the highest levels being observed in the females. These results are in agreement with Peterson's previous work." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/533078/ Another study saying "vit" A deficiency caused ceruloplasmin to go up? (these studies are not hard to find) Finally, a study on chickens fed a "vitamin A deficient" diet for 20 days showed they had the HIGHEST CERULOPLASMIN at the end of the 20-day study! https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3034814/ (see picture from full study below) So, based on this small group of studies, it would seem the "science" isn't very straightforward on this, and any studies showing "vit" A raised ceruloplasmin very specifically used SYNTHETIC RETINOIC ACID aka ACCUTANE...so Mr. Robbins by his own standards SHOULD NOT be able to use any of it to justify his position So why such disparate results? First, they gave the rats and liver cells RETINOIC ACID, and the ACUTE PHASE REACTANT called CERULOPLASMIN which goes UP in INFLAMMATION reacted accordingly to the toxic input. This makes sense to me Next, when one understands that animal studies commonly use casein protein that very likely still have "vit" A in the casein as oxidized retinoic acid (which is not found when they analyze for retinol, so they say there is "no vitamin A" but they are quite wrong, the heating and alcohol they used to supposedly "remove" the vA just changed its form so they couldn't see it any longer), then nearly all the studies above make sense in my framework I put people on low "vitamin" A diets for YEARS, and they are not developing so-called "copper deficiency" or ceruloplasmin deficiency...shouldn't this problem have shown up by now if I'm wrong? I would love to see the pseudo-intellectual tap-dancing done to try to make all of these studies align to somehow say that "vitamin" A is necessary to make ceruloplasmin, because if one takes them at face value, they most certainly DON'T The chicken study and my client results also don't agree with their assertions Remember, any study that uses synthetic forms of "vitamin" A must be disregarded by their own statements...and the "vitamin A deficient" diets raised ceruloplasmin in both rats and chickens 😂 Do I think he is wrong? Yeah, that's an understatement

Induction of ceruloplasmin synthesis by retinoic acid in rats: influence of dietary copper and vitamin A status - PubMed Ceruloplasmin, a copper-containing acute phase plasma protein, has been shown to be regulated by 13-cis retinoic acid in rats. Ceruloplasmin activity was significantly increased within 24 h and remained elevated for at least 72 h after a single injection of 13-cis retinoic acid. With daily injection … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Regulation of ceruloplasmin by retinoic acid in the developing rat - PubMed Ceruloplasmin (Cp), the major copper-binding protein in the plasma, is an acute phase protein with ferrioxidase activity. Both its oxidase activity and hepatic mRNA abundance increase during the developmental period. To test the possible role of retinoic acid, a derivative of vitamin A known to part … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Subcellular localization in normal and vitamin A-deficient rat liver of vitamin A serum transport proteins, albumin, ceruloplasmin and class I major histocompatibility antigens - PubMed The subcellular localization in rat liver cells of retinol-binding protein (RBP), prealbumin, ceruloplasmin, albumin, and class I transplantation antigen chains was investigated by radioimmunoassay determinations. The concentration of RBP was high in the rough and smooth endoplasmic reticulum (SER). … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
[Changes in blood levels of haptoglobin and ceruloplasmin in vitamin A deficiency in Sprague-Dawley rats] - PubMed The aim of the present study was to find out whether the elevation of the serum ceruloplasmin level, previously described in vitamin-A-deficient rats, is a specific phenomenon. Quantitative variations of serum ceruloplasmin, albumin and haptoglobin (whose concentration increased during inflammation) … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
[Relation between ceruloplasmin and vitamin A in Sprague-Dawley rats] - PubMed The Moore's hypothesis concerning a relationship between the metabolism of copper and that of vitamin A led us to consider a possible relationship between this vitamin and ceruloplasmin, the carrier protein for copper. Experiments were carried out on Sprague-Dawley rats. The ceruloplasmin level of c … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The effect of different dietary levels of vitamin A on metabolism of copper iron and zinc in the chick - PubMed Chicks were fed on diets containing either no added vitamin A or 3300 micrograms/kg or 330,000 micrograms/kg retinol equivalents for 30 d. Concentrations of copper, iron and zinc were higher in liver and lower in plasma at low and high intakes of vitamin A. Haemoglobin, packed cell volume and erythr … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

The reasons birth control ruins health so effectively are obvious when one knows where to look: https://t.co/z6RxlZD1MU

@NutriDetect - Nutrition Detective 🔍 - Dr. Garrett Smith

BIRTH CONTROL PILLS CAUSE "vitamin" A TOXICITY & COPPER TOXICITY, A *CRITICAL* PIECE OF THE INFERTILITY PYSOP Health is fertility, fertility is health. If one is ruined, so is the other Ladies and the gentlemen who care about them, STOP destroying your health! A thread 🧵 https://t.co/9vePRo5j97

Saved - December 13, 2023 at 12:11 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The decline in fertility worldwide is alarming. Chemicals known as endocrine disruptors are to blame. To improve fertility, focus on the kitchen and bathroom. Avoid plastics, nonstick pans, and personal care products with harmful chemicals. Replace with glass, ceramics, cast iron, stainless steel, natural alternatives, and organic options. Be cautious of household products, clothing made from polyester, and non-natural fibers. Both men and women's health and fertility matter. Sperm counts have dropped drastically, and unborn children are greatly affected. This issue has fatal consequences, and we must demand healthier options. Spread awareness, reduce exposure, and prioritize our species' survival.

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

god where do i start first off, this is depressing as hell, but we gotta start talking about it before we go extinct dr. shanna swan + joe rogan discuss the impacts of manmade chemicals aka endocrine disruptors aka fucking EVERYTHING on human health an overview 🤦🏻‍♀️👇 https://t.co/a9V6BYlgES

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

WORLDWIDE fertility has declined 50% in the past 50 years! 🤯 this silent invasion of chemicals prevalent in our daily lives negatively impacts our overall health and fertility. researchers like dr. swan attribute this to ENDOCRINE DISRUPTORS. a shortlist: https://t.co/bx95CvWS6h

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

this shortlist is actually pretty damn long considering HOW MUCH of our lives these chemicals touch and account for. if you want to improve fertility (and you should, even if you don’t want kids), there’s two places to focus on, and it’s not in the bedroom:

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

1️⃣ THE KITCHEN generally want to avoid and remove all plastics (especially when using microwaves if you even dare but plz don’t) and replace with glass n ceramics. and for the love of god — no nonstick pans. use cast iron and stainless steel if cooking food… https://t.co/9frW5cbn8z

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

2️⃣ THE BATHROOM educate yourself on the different chemicals in personal care products and AVOID these disruptors. ladies and gentlemen, this applies to you both. https://t.co/v4NLb7p0ue

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

…or just pull a fast one and get rid of it all! no more make up and false eyelashes. i’ve gone au naturale, and im *this* close to washing my hair w raw egg and raw cream. i made a lip and cheek stain with fresh organic beet juice, aloe vera and castor oil — get creative! https://t.co/V8gjYMCMWQ

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

REPLACEMENT OPTIONS: lotion ➡️ tallow, ghee, oil facial/body soap ➡️ jojoba or olive oil on washcloth toothpaste ➡️ coconut oil deodorant ➡️ powdered sun-dried lemon peels sun screen ➡️ none! just stop eating seed oils perfumes/essential oil ➡️ natural pheromones 😏🥰

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

i recommend you get keen on what’s in ALL of your household products, including cleaning products and detergents. begin taking a closer look at EVERYTHING made from or with plastics or chemicals, and either get rid of it or see how you can replace it with a healthier option. https://t.co/UO73wuCGDM

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

next up: CLOTHING 60% of total supply is made from polyester aka PLASTIC! a quick google search will say there’s no bpa in polyester but… in 2017, American Chemical Society study found 82% out of 77 pieces of infant clothing tested for BPA 😩🍼 https://t.co/ESHUBlasLe

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

BE WARY of sportswear, sports bras…anything that’s not made of natural fibers, and go ORGANIC when possible! literal TONS of pesticides are used in the farming and production of cotton. your skin is your largest organ — help minimize its exposure. https://t.co/ySuFXUfUFS

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

miscarriage and infertility rates are on the rise. we can no longer look away. according to dr. swan: today, a woman in her 20’s is less fertile than her grandmother was at 35! but it’s not just the women… https://t.co/uzF6amVknq

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

unfortunately, if a couple is unable to get pregnant, fingers are often first pointed at the woman — but it takes more than just eggs to bake a cake! conceiving a child is just as contingent upon the man’s health and fertility as well. https://t.co/DHOxTwKsk8

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

if we look at the decline in sperm count, the average across western countries has dropped CATASTROPHICALLY. 1973 - 99M/mL (healthy) 2011 - 47M/mL that’s a 52.5% decline in a mere 38 years! at this rate, sperm counts are on the way to ZERO. zero sperm = extinction ☠️ https://t.co/Ldok0vJ9uV

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

unborn children of pregnant women (fetus in utero) experience the greatest impact of these chemicals. good news is (finally) if conditions are improved, it’s *possible* that it can be reversed in three fucking generations. https://t.co/Wh2xJlciqZ

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

this is a HUGE issue with FATAL repercussions. corporations profit off ignorance at the expense of our health — but some countries are doing better than others! in the U.S., only 11 chemicals are forbidden from personal care items as compared to 1,100+ in european countries https://t.co/hTVS4Wmilb

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

WE ARE AN ENDANGERED SPECIES. if we use the U.S. Fish and Wildlife criteria for listing a species as threatened or endangered, only ONE of these five factors are needed to qualify a species as such …at least THREE apply to us homo sapiens! https://t.co/hXSIe9SeJh

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

to summarize: human health has been compromised by endocrine disruptors found in, well, EVERYTHING, and it’s imperative we push for healthier processes and options as our fertility — our SPECIES — depends on it. 💠 get educated 💠 reduce exposure 💠 spread the word

Saved - October 19, 2023 at 7:55 PM

@PSSDNetwork - PSSD Network | Post-SSRI Sexual Dysfunction

"This sacred part of the human experience has been stolen from me." Some children will never develop normal sexual function because of antidepressants they were given at a young age. Both parents and children are not given informed consent about #PSSD. https://t.co/UTjpnPaSnK

Saved - February 4, 2024 at 9:48 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The posts discuss the controversial use of antidepressants, specifically SSRIs, and their potential dangers. The monoamine hypothesis of depression, which suggests a depletion of neurotransmitters like serotonin leads to depression, is questioned. The posts highlight the history of reserpine, the development of SSRIs, and the alleged manipulation of data by pharmaceutical companies like Lilly. The FDA's approval of Prozac despite evidence of its dangers is mentioned, along with lawsuits and trials related to SSRIs and violent tendencies. The posts conclude with a critique of the pharmaceutical industry and the continued widespread use of these medications.

@Outdoctrination - Analyze & Optimize

THEY ARE USING THIS TO KILL US THE DISTURBING TRUTH BEHIND “ANTIDEPRESSANTS” (SSRIs) LONG THREAD

@Outdoctrination - Analyze & Optimize

We released our video on the topic about 2 years ago, which dives deep into the story of serotonin. https://youtu.be/-Ye6L38lOmE

@Outdoctrination - Analyze & Optimize

The monoamine hypothesis of depression has and continues to guide the medical establishment and collective consciousness on depression. This theory states that a depletion of monoamine neurotransmitters, dopamine, norepinephrine and serotonin, leads to “depression.”

@Outdoctrination - Analyze & Optimize

Reserpine, a drug that had been used for centuries by Indians. Even Ghandi used it. Reserpine works by inhibiting the release of all monoamines. Despite showing benefit in humans, the narrative became that it induced depression in animals due to its sedative properties.

@Outdoctrination - Analyze & Optimize

This "theory" lead to the creation of various drugs that are still in wide use today. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors prevent breakdown of these compounds, while tricyclics act as dopamine, serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, also increasing their amount.

@Outdoctrination - Analyze & Optimize

However, since then the reserpine-induced depression model has been characterized as a myth by various researchers. Recent reviews have stated that reserpine, at best does not consistently induce depression, and in many cases can treat it! https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10076328/

The effects of reserpine on depression: A systematic review Reserpine is an effective antihypertensive drug, but its role in routine practice has declined such that it is rarely used. This is largely based on the assumption that reserpine causes depression. This assumption was a foundation for the original monoamine ... ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@Outdoctrination - Analyze & Optimize

This should come as no surprise given that these 3 neurotransmitters all have remarkably different effects on mood and perspective.

@Outdoctrination - Analyze & Optimize

Some small studies suggested a link between lower serotonin levels in certain brain regions post mortem, further driving the hypothesis. The authors cautioned that these findings were preliminary and did not do much but allow them to test more hypotheses.

@Outdoctrination - Analyze & Optimize

Pharma giant Lilly went to work quickly on developing drugs that selectively increased serotonin. In their original manuscript, they claim that there is multiple lines of evidence suggesting serotonin is low in depression, but their references don’t remotely support this.

@Outdoctrination - Analyze & Optimize

In fact, it supported the exact opposite: administering serotonin precursors caused sedation, numbness, convulsions, tremors and agitation. Dopamine precursors produced alertness with none of these “side effects.”

@Outdoctrination - Analyze & Optimize

They also note that 5HIAA cerebrospinal fluid concentrations, which is the “deactivated” version of serotonin, were decreased in certain mental illness. They went ahead and assumed that this was because they had less serotonin generally, not because they had less turnover!

@Outdoctrination - Analyze & Optimize

So it becomes clear rather quickly that tTeuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) were not only completely unfounded, but were likely intentional given what we’ve discussed previously: that serotonin makes people easy to manipulate:

@Outdoctrination - Analyze & Optimize

THE CIA SET OUT TO FIND A WAY TO CONTROL THE MINDS OF THE PEOPLE WITH DISTURBING EXPERIMENTS THEY FOUND OUT SEROTONIN WAS THE KEY TO MIND CONTROL, AND LSD WAS THEIR WORST NIGHTMARE: THREAD

@Outdoctrination - Analyze & Optimize

Documentation from LIlly in 1984 showed that severe agitation leading to suicide occurred in over 1% of patients, a figure large enough that it was required to be disclosed to regulatory agencies. Of course, Lilly excluded this when seeking approval. old.narpa.org/prozac.revisit…

@Outdoctrination - Analyze & Optimize

Lilly first tried to get Prozac approved in Germany, with their drug regulatory agency saying in a fax back to Lilly that “we think this preparation totally unsuitable for the treatment of depression.”

@Outdoctrination - Analyze & Optimize

This hilarious reaction was driven by the fact that after reviewing Prozac’s trial data, it was painfully obvious that many patients would take the drug and go on to commit suicide.

@Outdoctrination - Analyze & Optimize

“it refused to approve the antidepressant based on Lilly's studies showing that previously nonsuicidal patients who took the drug had a 5 fold higher rate of suicides and suicide attempts than those on older antidepressants, and a 3 fold higher rate than those taking placebos.”

@Outdoctrination - Analyze & Optimize

Despite this clear evidence that Prozac was outright dangerous and made people kill themselves, the FDA approved Prozac in 1987, and it quickly became one of the hottest drugs on the market.

@Outdoctrination - Analyze & Optimize

In 1987, the first lawsuit involving Prozac and violent tendencies was initiated. A man who was taking Prozac shot and killed eight people, injured twelve others and then committed suicide at his workplace. The verdict was that it had nothing to do with Prozac.

@Outdoctrination - Analyze & Optimize

In 1990, shortly after Prozac’s approval, Harvard psychiatrist Martin H. Teicher reported that SSRIs could cause suicidal or homicidal tendencies. He described cases in disturbing, gory detail. It was clear that these individuals had their reality distorted.

@Outdoctrination - Analyze & Optimize

Lilly scientists were pressured by executives to alter records on doctor experiences with Prozac: changing mentions of “suicide attempts” to "overdose" and suicidal thoughts to "depression." Once again we have clear indication that they knew exactly what they were doing

@Outdoctrination - Analyze & Optimize

One LIlly employee stated: “I do not think I could explain to [anyone] why we would do this especially on the sensitive issue of suicide and suicide ideation. At least not with the explanations that have been given to our staff so far.”

@Outdoctrination - Analyze & Optimize

Lilly also withheld data demonstrating that “Prozac may produce nervousness, anxiety, agitation, or insomnia in 19% of users and sedation in 13% of users”

@Outdoctrination - Analyze & Optimize

The FDA became aware of this deliberate manipulation. The chief FDA epidemiologist stated: “Because of apparent large-scale underreporting, the firm's analysis cannot be considered as proving that fluoxetine and violent behavior are unrelated."

@Outdoctrination - Analyze & Optimize

Despite massive evidence to the contrary, in 1991 the FDA concluded that there was no evidence for a causal link between Prozac and violence. Shocking.

@Outdoctrination - Analyze & Optimize

Lilly also had hired guns to dismiss these notions. Researchers they had on staff churned out questionable statistical analysis that “disproved” Teicher’s concerns, but Teicher pointed out the flaws in their work.

@Outdoctrination - Analyze & Optimize

Lilly later initiated a media smear campaign against another Harvard doctor published the book Prozac Backlash, detailing Lilly’s malpractice and tendency to hide or downplay harms of their drug.

@Outdoctrination - Analyze & Optimize

Things came to a climax at the Tobin v. SmithKline trial, where an individual shot and killed his wife, daughter, granddaughter, and himself after just two doses of Praxil, another SSRI drug. Finally, Pharma was held (somewhat) accountable, as the jury found for the plaintiff.

@Outdoctrination - Analyze & Optimize

Doctors testified, saying that there was already a extensive existing literature on how SSRIs could cause suicidal or homicidal tendencies. They presented substantial evidence that both Lilly and SmithKline were well aware of this.

@Outdoctrination - Analyze & Optimize

Several other trials were held about similar issues: people starting to take SSRIs and then killing others and/or themselves. By this point it didn’t matter. Prozac was a top 5 selling drug and was raking in billions. Paying off a few million to some families was well worth it.

@Outdoctrination - Analyze & Optimize

In 2004, the FDA finally issued a blackbox warning on these medications of a “link” between taking them and violence and/or suicide and worsened depression. Zoloft, Lexapro, Prozac and Celexa continue to make billions, being handed out to tens of millions of Americans yearly.

@Outdoctrination - Analyze & Optimize

Oh yeah, but you know, it was just an accident. They didn’t know any better. More studies are needed. Give me a f*cking break. This is pure evil

@Outdoctrination - Analyze & Optimize

Thanks for reading through this thread, we will have plenty of more content on this issue soon. Toss us a RT if you enjoyed, and be sure to check out all of our content, consultation options and supplements over at https://lnk.bio/analyze.and.optimize

Analyze & Optimize Analyze & Optimize - Content, Consultations & Affiliate Links lnk.bio
Saved - November 2, 2023 at 1:25 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
American consumption of corn, driven by subsidies, may have negative effects on reproductive health. Chemicals sprayed on corn, like Atrazine and glyphosate, are known to disrupt hormones. GMO corn and its own pesticide may contribute to obesity. Corn contains a substance that causes infertility and cancer. Corn oil and other products also have estrogenic effects. Lab experiments using corn may yield unreliable results. American obesity rates correlate with corn consumption. The health crisis is likely multifactorial.

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

IS CORN AN ENDOCRINE DISRUPTOR? Americans consume vast quantities of corn, largely thanks to a subsidy system that rewards overproduction. But could all that corn be having serious negative effects on Americans' reproductive health?

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

If you want to know more about the insane system of subsidies that has led American farmers to produce over 10 billion bushels of corn a year, read my essay "The People of Corn" for American Greatness. https://amgreatness.com/2023/05/20/the-people-of-corn/

The People of Corn › American Greatness Probably the best unintentional compliment a hostile reviewer has paid my new book, The Eggs Benedict Option, was to describe it as “if Tucker Carlson tried to… amgreatness.com

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

Because there is so much corn, food makers are constantly finding ways to insinuate it into more and more food. High-fructose corn syrup was one product that was created to do precisely this. Virtually every processed food product contains HFCS. https://t.co/S8KMlHy9oI

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

When people talk about corn and endocrine (hormone) disruption, they usually talk about the chemicals (like Atrazine and glyphosate) that are sprayed on it. These nasty chemicals are known to have gender-bending effects. https://t.co/Mi3JrI4OL5

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

GMO corn, which has had bacterial genes inserted into it to make the corn produce its own pesticide, appears to be implicated in obesity, as the thread below shows. But bog-standard corn may also have some nasty effects of its own. https://t.co/rpUTXzeu0u

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

IS GM CORN RESPONSIBLE FOR OBESITY IN AMERICA? Researchers at the University of Toledo compared corn consumption with obesity figures for the US and found some interesting correlations. 👇

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

In 2002, researchers identified a novel substance in corn (a tetrohydrofuran-diol) that rendered female mice infertile and also caused the proliferation of prostate cancer and breast cancer cells. They discovered that it worked independently of the body's estrogen receptors. https://t.co/91Dxw0341n

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

Researchers in the '60s already knew that corn oil was estrogenic, and that other vegetable and seed oils, including peanut oil and soybean oil, had the same effects. A 1987 study showed that corn oil was more estrogen than some kinds of diethylstilberol (DES). https://t.co/JRITcyW6LM

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

DES was an estrogenic substance that was administered freely for morning sickness and other female hormonal problems, until it was discovered that it was heavily linked to cancer, miscarriage, stillbirths and a range of other serious negative effects.

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

What's interesting about this novel endocrine disruptor in corn is that it's recovered from corn cobs, corn kernels and from products like tortillas. It's not only found in corn oil. Potentially every corn product contains it and thus may have hormone-disrupting effects.

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

At the time of the 2002 study, some scientists were extremely worried that feeding use of corn products in lab experiments might be seriously interfering with the results. Potentially, all studies where lab animals eat corn could be affected. https://t.co/7viFI9syYJ

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

Corn (oil and starch) is a staple part of rodent chow in experiments, and lab rodents also sleep on corn cob bedding. The researchers behind the 2002 study found that rats could be made infertile simply by TOUCHING corncob bedding. https://t.co/UoSeT6eKgh

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

You'd think this would have been big news in the scientific community, but nothing much seems to have come of it. So we have to face the possibility that 1) the results of many lab experiments may be unreliable and 2) this novel endocrine disruptor may also be having serious

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

effects on us as well. I'm in no doubt that the health crisis Americans face is multifactorial. It's not just exposure to chemicals or the food we eat: it's likely to be both those things and probably more too.

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

Still, the fact is, American consumption of corn tracks more or less 1:1 with obesity. Americans are eating unprecedented amounts of corn, and they're also fat and reproductively unhealthy in an unprecedented way. https://t.co/xgroBLWPMO

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

The researchers found an almost 1:1 correlation between corn consumption and obesity.

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

Here's the 2002 study: https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/epdf/10.1289/ehp.02110169

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

Here's an interesting discussion of it from the time (scroll to the last page): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1241698/pdf/ehp0111-a00691.pdf

Saved - July 27, 2023 at 5:33 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Bottled drinking water contains chemicals that hinder hormone absorption, affecting both estrogen and androgen levels. Even a small amount of 375 ml can interfere with up to 60% of estrogen absorption and 90% of androgen absorption. This poses a serious threat to our hormone system. To combat this, consider using a reliable water filtration system like ZeroWater's 5-stage filtration dispenser and faucet-mounted filter. Filtering your tap water twice can help protect your body from the harmful effects of bottled water.

@drawandstrike - Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

Let me translate this part for those of you in Rio Linda: It means there are chemicals in your bottled drinking water that directly inhibiting your cells from absorbing the sex hormones your thyroid is producing. Women produce estrogen, men produce androgen. Just 3.75 ml of bottle water ingested interfered with the body's utilization of up to 60% of estrogen hormone absorption and 90% of androgen hormone absorption. Yes, if this is true, its as bad as it sounds. Bottled water would literally be screwing up your hormone system.

@AlpacaAurelius - Carnivore Aurelius ©🥩 ☀️🦙

wow this study shows that the majority of bottled water has incredibly potent antiandrogenic chemicals just 3.75mL of the bottled water...less than a sip...inhibited the androgen receptor up to 90 PERCENT absolutely insane. filtered water is the only option

@drawandstrike - Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

Let me translate this part for those of you in Rio Linda: It means there are chemicals in your bottled drinking water that directly inhibiting your cells from absorbing the sex hormones your thyroid is producing. Women produce estrogen, men produce androgen. Just 3.75 ml of bottle water ingested interfered with the body's utilization of up to 60% of estrogen hormone absorption and 90% of androgen hormone absorption. Yes, if this is true, its as bad as it sounds. Bottled water would literally be screwing up your hormone system.

@drawandstrike - Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

Given that most people eat a horrible diet that already interferes with their bodies regular production of hormones, whatever level of estrogen or androgen hormones are being produced by the thyroid is being attacked by the receptor antagonists in bottled drinking water.

@drawandstrike - Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

Here is the study that found receptor antagonists in **the majority** of the bottled water brands they studied, with flavored bottled water having the most antagonists in it. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24015248/

Identification of putative steroid receptor antagonists in bottled water: combining bioassays and high-resolution mass spectrometry - PubMed Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are man-made compounds interfering with hormone signaling and thereby adversely affecting human health. Recent reports provide evidence for the presence of EDCs in commercially available bottled water, including steroid receptor agonists and antagonists. However … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@drawandstrike - Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

Given that you need a correctly and fully functioning thyroid to be healthy, as it creates and dispenses the sex hormones your body needs [women have the estrogenic hormones, men get the androgenic hormones, the most well known of which is testosterone] to function, anything that gums up the works or prevents your body from utilizing these hormones is A Very Bad Thing.

@drawandstrike - Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

Also note that the date on this published scientific study that found these results about how bottled water directly inhibits the body's absorption of sex hormones is dated **2013**. And yet it supposed to be some HUGE MYSTERY why men's androgenic hormone counts - testosterone counts - are dropping like a stalled rocket to the Earth.

@drawandstrike - Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

For men: even **if** you had a healthy functioning thyroid gland for the last 10 yrs, if you drank bottled water every day, you were ingesting something directly preventing your body from absorbing **up to 90%** of the androgenic hormones your thyroid was producing for you.

@drawandstrike - Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

I've already been looking for a good water filtration system and am going to try this one: http://zerowater.com Just bought the 32 cup 5 stage filtration dispenser and the faucet-mounted filter. I'm going to begin double-filtering my tap water, first with the faucet-mounted filter then with the 32 cup dispenser.

Water Filters & Water Filter Pitchers - Clean Water at Home Eliminate all contaminants from your drinking water with the best water filters on the market. Choose ZeroWater for the purest tasting water! zerowater.com

@drawandstrike - Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

@JakesEpiphany Highly filtered water. Filter it at your sink, then filter it again in a container. I just bought the 32 cup 5-state filtration dispenser here, plus the faucet-mounted filtration system. https://zerowater.com/collections/all-water-filter-products

Shop Water Filters, Pitchers, & Systems for the Home | ZeroWater Browse water filters, pitchers, dispensers, TDS meters, & more. ZeroWater filter systems bring the purest tasting water to your home. Get yours today! zerowater.com
Saved - August 3, 2023 at 3:56 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Estrogen's effects on the male brain are concerning. Research shows that it can lead to depression and neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's and Parkinson's. Estrogen therapy in menopausal women has also been linked to dementia. Moreover, it increases the risks of autoimmune diseases, prostate and breast cancer, and cardiovascular diseases. These findings are supported by studies in the trans population, where higher incidences of physical and neurological diseases have been observed. It's crucial to consider these risks when prescribing estrogen therapy.

@JanuaryDoNoHarm - January Littlejohn

I have been sent important research on the effects of estrogen on the male brain by a researcher who wishes to remain anonymous. "Giving estrogen to young males for GD is like giving cyanide to cancer patients just because “someone said it helps.” 🧵1/25 @LeorSapir @jaypgreene

@JanuaryDoNoHarm - January Littlejohn

2/ The effects of estrogen therapy on menopausal women have been studied for some time, but in the last few years, there has been a host of research on the effect of estrogen on trans women (TW). All of such research have been published in reputed medical journals.

@JanuaryDoNoHarm - January Littlejohn

3/ Excess estrogen in the serum in natal males has been associated with depression – studies both among adult men doi.org/10.1016/j.psyn… and adolescent boys doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.… show that.

@JanuaryDoNoHarm - January Littlejohn

4/ Clinical studies (i.e., studies that recruit actual subjects rather than rely on anonymous, online, non-probability surveys) that promote gender medicine fail to show any improvement in psychosocial outcomes among AMAB, e.g., the NEJM study doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa….

@JanuaryDoNoHarm - January Littlejohn

5/ In the main text, the study finds no improvement in depression, anxiety symptoms, or life satisfaction among natal male youth nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.105… 📷

@JanuaryDoNoHarm - January Littlejohn

6/ Why estrogen causes depression: 12 mths of estrogen treatment among trans women decreased serum BDNF levels doi.org/10.1016/j.euro…. Decrease in BDNF is associated with increased risks of developing major depressive disorder doi.org/10.1186/s13104….

@JanuaryDoNoHarm - January Littlejohn

7/ *Physiologically*, recent research shows that estrogen has far more serious effects.

@JanuaryDoNoHarm - January Littlejohn

8/ In male rats, estrogen changed the brain to resemble those in brains of TW doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbe…. It reduces the water content in the astrocytes, shrinking cortical structures and increasing ventricular volume, which has been observed in other studies among TW. 7/

@JanuaryDoNoHarm - January Littlejohn

9/ Why is that important? Astrocytes control the glutamate (a neurotransmitter) released at the synapses. They optimize neuronal functions and prevent “glutamate excitotoxicity” – a prolonged or exacerbated activation of glutamate receptors https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8020184

Astrocytes Maintain Glutamate Homeostasis in the CNS by Controlling the Balance between Glutamate Uptake and Release Glutamate is one of the most prevalent neurotransmitters released by excitatory neurons in the central nervous system (CNS); however, residual glutamate in the extracellular space is, potentially, neurotoxic. It is now well-established that one of the fundamental functions of astrocytes is to uptake most of the synaptically-released glutamate, which optimizes neuronal functions and prevents glutamate excitotoxicity. In the CNS, glutamate clearance is mediated by glutamate uptake transporters expressed, principally, by astrocytes. Interestingly, recent studies demonstrate that extracellular glutamate stimulates Ca2+ release from the astrocytes’ intracellular stores, which triggers glutamate release from astrocytes to the adjacent neurons, mostly by an exocytotic mechanism. This released glutamate is believed to coordinate neuronal firing and mediate their excitatory or inhibitory activity. Therefore, astrocytes contribute to glutamate homeostasis in the CNS, by maintaining the balance between their opposing functions of glutamate uptake and release. This dual function of astrocytes represents a potential therapeutic target for CNS diseases associated with glutamate excitotoxicity. In this regard, we summarize the molecular mechanisms of glutamate uptake and release, their regulation, and the significance of both processes in the CNS. Also, we review the main features of glutamate metabolism and glutamate excitotoxicity and its implication in CNS diseases. mdpi.com

@JanuaryDoNoHarm - January Littlejohn

10/ Glutamate excitotoxicity can start "a cascade of neurotoxicity,” leading to the loss of neuronal function and cell death, which then leads to neurodegenerative diseases doi.org/10.3389/fncel.….

@JanuaryDoNoHarm - January Littlejohn

11/ What does that mean? It turns out that an increase in glutamate in the brain can lead to neurological disorders like Alzheimer's, ALS, Parkinson’s, MS, and fibromyalgia. bit.ly/44DSxMo

@JanuaryDoNoHarm - January Littlejohn

12/ The subcortical changes (decrease in cortical thickness and volume and increase in ventricular structures) brought about by estrogen therapy mentioned above have been linked to many neurological disorders. See the next 4 tweets (12-15)

@JanuaryDoNoHarm - January Littlejohn

13/ Decreasing brain cortical thickness and volume is associated with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder (doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl…) and lower levels of general intelligence (doi.org/10.1016/j.inte…).

@JanuaryDoNoHarm - January Littlejohn

14/ The rodent study found that estrogen treatment reduced white matter integrity, which is associated with cognitive instability (doi.org/10.1523/JNEURO…). And a reduction in gray matter is a prominent feature of Alzheimer's (doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.…).

@JanuaryDoNoHarm - January Littlejohn

15/ The increase in the volume of ventricular structures compresses the brain from within, eventually damaging and destroying brain tissue. aans.org/Patients/Neuro…

@JanuaryDoNoHarm - January Littlejohn

16/ Reduction in hippocampal volume is associated with cognitive dysfunction and is a core symptom in patients with major depression. jpn.ca/content/31/5/3…

@JanuaryDoNoHarm - January Littlejohn

17/ (Estrogen was once believed to be a promising treatment among older menopausal women to delay onset of dementia. The WHIMS study (1996) was designed to test whether HRT reduces incidence of dementia in women 65+. doi.org/10.1016/s0197-… (contd. next 3 tweets)

@JanuaryDoNoHarm - January Littlejohn

18/ (The WHIMS study was discontinued in 2002 as it showed that long-term estrogen-progestin therapy increased the risk of dementia in women aged 65+, leading the researchers to conclude that the risks of HRT outweigh the benefits doi.org/10.1001/jama.2….

@JanuaryDoNoHarm - January Littlejohn

19/ (Now, a new nationwide study from Denmark among menopausal women on estrogen therapy found that it was associated with dementia, even with short-term use (the risks increased with the duration of use), and also among women younger than 65. doi.org/10.1136/bmj-20…

@JanuaryDoNoHarm - January Littlejohn

20/ (In the Danish study, MRI scans of the brain found evidence of brain atrophy, which is associated with cognitive decline and dementia doi.org/10.1148/radiol…. So, two studies associate estrogen therapy with dementia among natal women for its *prescribed* use.)

@JanuaryDoNoHarm - January Littlejohn

21/ Recent research shows that estrogen therapy among trans women has been implicated in various autoimmune diseases, from MS to rheumatoid arthritis and many others (remember that an increase in glutamate is also associated with MS) doi.org/10.1016/j.sema…

@JanuaryDoNoHarm - January Littlejohn

22/ Estrogen increases the risks of prostate cancer (doi.org/10.1586/eem.11…) and breast cancer among natal men (doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20…).

@JanuaryDoNoHarm - January Littlejohn

23/ Among TW, estrogen increases risks of cardiovascular diseases (two separate studies), often by as much as tenfold compared to their cisgender counterparts. doi.org/10.7326/M17-27…, doi.org/10.1161/CIRCUL…

@JanuaryDoNoHarm - January Littlejohn

24/ Validating the abovementioned research, empirically, we see a much higher incidence of many of these physical (doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2…) and neurological diseases (doi.org/10.1016/j.anne…) in the trans population.

@JanuaryDoNoHarm - January Littlejohn

25/ Not coincidentally, perhaps, population cohort studies (two separate studies) show that trans women, on average, die decades earlier than either cisgender men or women doi.org/10.1016/S2213-…, doi.org/10.1215/007033… @SpencerLndqst @jordanbpeterson

Saved - August 14, 2023 at 5:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Prozac, containing fluoride, raises concerns about its impact on individuals and society. Personal experiences reveal potential long-term damage, including gut problems, autoimmune issues, acne, joint pain, and sleep disturbances. Prescriptions are often given without considering lifestyle factors. Side effects like dissociation, weight gain, and brain zaps are reported. The author believes SSRIs and other psychiatric drugs are toxic and widespread usage may contribute to a zombified society. The interaction between aluminum vaccines and fluoride is also alarming.

@Inversionism - Inversionism

Did you know that Prozac is largely made of fluoride? How many mass shooters have been on SSRIs? How many violent acts have been committed because of their dissociative influence? I think the impact of these drugs is incomprehensible on the individual, and especially society. I took that poison for 6 months my first year of college, and I still wonder if it did permanent damage to me. I had bad gut problems, autoimmune issues, severe cystic acne, joint pain, sleep issues, and a ton of other problems, so obviously I was depressed. I went to my local doctor when I came home over spring break and told him how I was feeling, and within 10 mins he wrote me a prescription for it. He didn't ask about my diet. He didn't ask if I exercised. He asked a few questions about my general mood and what triggers me to feel bad, and that was it. At the time, my diet was abhorrent. I was eating tons of sugar, drinking 1-2L of Dr pepper per day, energy drinks, and eating the college prepared cafeteria food that was very low quality, while also being addicted to video games like SC2 and LoL. Standard dumb teenager with no real guidance or knowledge. Also had a bad reaction to a flu vaccine my senior year of highschool about a year before this. Within a couple weeks of taking it, I remember feeling like I was outside myself. Like I was a passenger of my own consciousness or something, but it did give me a short term relief. After a couple months, it started to make me feel worse though, and I put on like 20-25lbs really fast, became very agoraphobic, and stopped caring about pretty much everything, so I quit cold turkey one morning after realizing I had slept for 12+ hours after sitting on my ass all day. Had brain zaps for 6 months after that. Dozens of times a day, my brain and body would jolt out of nowhere. I think SSRIs, antidepressants, benzos, and every other psych drug are the most terrifying and toxic drugs on the face of the earth, and should never be taken by anyone, ever. Now realize that a large majority of the US populace is on one or several of those types of meds, and you will now understand why there are so many zombified NPCs everywhere just supporting the current thing and sleepwalking into oblivion. Scares the shit out of me. What's even more terrifying is when you read the research on the interactions between aluminum (vaccines...) and fluoride. I'll save that for a future post.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Fluoride is found in many psychoactive drugs, including Prozac and Zoloft, as it affects serotonin levels in the brain. It is also used in other pharmaceutical products to enhance their effects. However, there are concerns about the negative impact of fluoride on the brain, including reduced IQ and memory problems. Studies have shown an association between fluoride exposure and lowered IQ. The use of fluoride in preventive dentistry programs is criticized for damaging children's brains. The effects of fluoride on the central nervous system have been kept secret by the government. Some individuals have reported improved thought processes and concentration after discontinuing fluoride use. The damage caused by fluoride to children's intelligence is a concern for the country's future.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Anytime you see the letters FLU0, you're talking fluoride. Speaker 1: And so when you start realizing that Prozac is a fluoride product, Zoloft is a product. Virtually all of your psychotropic drugs, almost all of those are mood elevators. And one of the reasons being is because it has this tremendous capacity to affect serotonin. Serotonin being the chemical that goes from 1 neuron to the other brain neuron. So when we looked at the selective serotonin reuptake and basically inhibition of the serotonin to be taken up, that's the fluoride that's doing that. Speaker 0: Prozac is fluoxetine. It's a fluorinated psychoactive. Matter of fact, all almost all your psychoactive drugs are fluorinated drugs. They put it in there both as as a carrier and an accelerator of the effect. Speaker 2: A The actual active ingredient in Prozac is fluoride. Speaker 3: Prozac is made almost entirely from a fluoride molecules. It is and like SSRI drugs are similar molecularly to some of the elements in fluoride. A Remember the school shootings in Columbine, Colorado? They were on SSRI drugs. Those drugs make your mind think that you're not living in the real world, that You're actually just sort of experiencing a false reality and I think fluoride has much the same effect. Speaker 1: There's tons of, products that are pharmaceutical products that a, in some cases, the fluoride is just being used to, what I call, potentiate it to actually make it a stronger one. Finfin, which is the diet drug that was taken off the Well, why did they take it off? Well, Fenfluramine, and you hear the fluoride part in there, a, the Fenfluramine was the part that actually made the thickening of the heart valves so that they pulled off. Amazing part about it is Rhohypnol, the date rape drug. A lot of people just call it that. And so what does that rufe do? Basically, it causes anterograde amnesia. A fluoride product. Well, okay, that's a fluoride product. So how does it do that? Well, we probably should have guessed that it would do that already anyway because if you went in and had surgery, general surgery right now, knock on wood, that you don't have to ever do that. But if you were, they would give you 4 molecules of fluorine and 2 of bromine and 1 of chlorine and that's what knocks you out during that time. So the truth is that when you start looking at all the pharmaceutical uses for it, that it's just amazing all the things that has been a that are around us all the time that we did not recognize or that we did not see. Speaker 4: There is absolutely no drug on the market a that's given in a one dose fits all situation. Speaker 5: We don't put other things in the water to try to keep everybody's blood pressure down or everybody's stroke risk down. And there's no reason why we should be trying a one size fits all approach for this either. Speaker 6: Once you put a medicine in the drinking water, you can't control the dose, because you can't control how much water people drink, you can't control it, it goes to everybody. A If you ask a pharmacist if there's any drug in his store that was safe enough to give to everyone, a Young people, old people, sick people, people with poor nutrition, give it to them in any dose, they'd laugh at you. It's ridiculous. Speaker 7: A There's no way you can give out a medicine without being able to control the dose. And 1 dose cannot fit all and you can't give a medicine to everyone. A You are forcing it on people who don't want it. There are people in this audience who've spent far more time researching this issue, including David, Speaker 8: myself, and many other people Speaker 7: in this So many of the people in this audience, and they stated categorically to the mayor, to the city councilors, we do not want you to force this medicine a On us. We have the right to inform consent to medication. That's a very important right. This is a violation. A It's been violated every day in this country to over 200,000,000 people. Speaker 2: There needs to be informed consent. We have that with all other medications. Fluoride. When we go to the doctor, he or she gives us the information of what the side effects are gonna be. With fluoride, there is no informed consent. There is no a safe dose for one size, this one size fits all medication that they're doing to us. Speaker 6: Now, a All of those issues are important, but the one that really concerns me is the impact of fluoride on the brain. A A study panel for the Speaker 9: EPA listed fluoride as amongst 109 chemicals for which there was significant evidence of neurological a Speaker 10: It has definite impact on the neurons, which is the nerve parts of the brain. You don't just grow those back. A It's not like, well, I cut myself, so now I'm renewing myself. It doesn't happen to the neurons. Speaker 9: There are so many ways a The fluoride could be damaging the brain. Speaker 6: We know this from animal studies. Speaker 5: Doctor Phyllis Mullinix exposed rats to fluoride to work out its effects a On the human brain and the central nervous system. Speaker 4: What we did was we exposed them, let them drink the fluoride in the water for 6 to 20 weeks. A The pattern that we saw typically is what we see with other neurotoxic agents that are well known to cause a hypoactivity a Or a memory problem or an IQ problem. When I first presented the results of these studies, one of the a Individual sitting and listening to the results, he says, do you have any idea what you're saying? And he says, you're telling us that we're reducing the IQ of children. Speaker 9: A Look, the 1st opponents of fluoridation in this country in the 1950s were biochemists. A These biochemists have used fluoride in their experiments to poison enzymes. Speaker 6: And they, including doctor James Sumner, Speaker 8: a who won the Nobel Prize Speaker 6: for enzyme chemistry at Cornell Speaker 9: and he said fluoride poisons enzymes. You don't want to put this substance into the body. Hoisting enzymes is what makes people sick. A Poison enzymes is what kills people. Speaker 6: It's highly likely that you're gonna get subtle effects on the brain Speaker 8: a That the parent is not gonna notice. Speaker 0: No wonder that our children can't read and write. It's no wonder because we're damaging their brains with a stupid preventive dentistry program that doesn't even work. Speaker 6: We have behavioral studies, and we have 24 a IQ studies, 24 studies which now show an association between fairly modest exposure to fluoride a And lowered IQ. Speaker 0: They've actually got it down to 1 milligram dose of fluoride causes a point a five nine loss in IQ points. The average IQ is a 100. So if you're 95, a You're in the back of the class napping because you can't understand what the person in the front is saying, and you're gonna get a nice job pushing the broom around. So a What if you got twice that dose? Okay. You're down to 90. So what they showed in studies in in other countries is that you lose all your genius out of your society. A You've damaged the intellect. Speaker 5: But new research from China supports doctor Molineux's conclusion that fluoride affects mental development And I two levels. Speaker 11: I've heard a great deal about a chemical that can be used on the teeth to help prevent decay. Is that Speaker 5: a good thing to use? Speaker 0: It certainly is. A We use Speaker 5: a fluoride solution, and we have evidence that for some people 50 years ago, American government scientists had clinical evidence that fluoride affected the central nervous system, but all this was kept secret. Speaker 11: A chemical. You're going to Speaker 5: put some chemical in my mouth. All mentioned of, Speaker 4: of the effects of fluoride on the central nervous system a Speaker 8: In my view, fluoride is where lead was in the early seventies. That argument lasted about 10 years and it was finally proven that, yes, low level a of lead. Lower than caused visible symptoms was in fact damaging a child's mental development. I think the same thing is that we're gonna find with fluoride. A Speaker 2: As someone who has gotten off of fluoride, I can tell that my thought processes and my concentration is higher. Speaker 0: And so when you damage the IQ of the children, you lose your place in the country as a leader, and we have. A And that's because of the damage that our government has allowed to happen to the intelligence of our children.
Saved - September 1, 2023 at 3:51 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Sunlight emits various wavelengths of light, including UVC and VUV. Contrary to the belief perpetuated by Big Pharma, deep UV light is not toxic. UVC light has bactericidal properties and can eradicate microorganisms without side effects. However, studies on UVC's efficacy in vivo are limited. Western medicine, influenced by Rockefeller's centralized approach, prioritizes drugs over natural remedies. Rockefeller's efforts to control medical education and discredit holistic practices led to the current profit-driven healthcare system. Take charge of your health, question mainstream medicine, and embrace decentralized approaches like nutrition and sunlight. Reject centralized ideas in healthcare.

@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist 🟩🔆

1. Sunlight releases 250-780 nm light. 250-270 nm light is UVC light. Anything below this level is considered VUV light. The UV-C and VUV light is the light that scares physicians for only one reason. Big Pharma has convinced them that this causes direct DNA damage to human cells so it needs to be eliminated. I wonder what will happen when we build a photomultiplier that can measure the spectrum emitted from cells and find out that we create both UVC and VUV light? IS THIS Big Pharma MEME TRUE about the toxicity of deep UV light? No, it is not. Why does it persist? Once humans harness the sun's frequencies in this area we won't have a lot of drugs in healthcare to treat a lot of diseases. The sun's light is a decentralized compound pharmacy for health. @RickRubin This belief/perception is why light confusion exists and few studies are being done in vivo. Be aware of this. In summary, it has been known during the past one hundred years that UVC irradiation is highly bactericidal; however, using UVC illumination for the prevention and treatment of localized infections is still in the very early stages of development because of the influence of Big Pharma's profiteering. @hubermanlab Most of the studies are limited to in vitro and ex vivo levels, while in vivo animal studies and clinical studies are much rarer. A major advantage of using UVC over antibiotics is that UVC can rapidly eradicate resistant and pathogenic microorganisms without any systemic side effects. UVC may also be much more cost-effective than the commonly used antibiotics. SHOCKER to no one except the centralized shills. @JuicefBukele https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3831650/

Light based anti-infectives: ultraviolet C irradiation, photodynamic therapy, blue light, and beyond Owing to the worldwide increase in antibiotic resistance, researchers are investigating alternative anti-infective strategies to which it is supposed microorganisms will be unable to develop resistance. Prominent among these strategies, is a group of ... ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist 🟩🔆

2. Centralized medicine born from Rockefeller has some good points, and is great in an acute emergency situation, but it’s high time people realized that today’s mainstream medicine (Western centralized medicine or allopathy or functional medicine), with its focus on drug supplements, drugs, radiation, drugs, surgery, drugs and more drugs, is at its foundation a money-spinning Rockefeller creation.

@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist 🟩🔆

3. This thread will detail the bizarre history behind John D. Rockefeller's creation of centralized Big Pharma and the foundations of Western Medicine that are destroying our metabolic health. @JuicefBukele John D. Rockefeller was an oil magnate and one of the richest men in history. He was America’s first billionaire and amassed a fortune of $498B adjusted for inflation of the USD as of 2023.

@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist 🟩🔆

@JuicefBukele 4. Through monopolistic practices, Rockefeller grew his company, Standard Oil, to control 90% of all oil refineries in the U.S. Standard Oil has since broken up and has now become Chevron, Exxon, Mobil, etc. Yes, that’s how big Standard Oil was in its prime.

@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist 🟩🔆

5. In 1900, Scientists discovered petrochemicals. These were chemicals that could be created from oil. Bakelite, the first plastic, was created from oil in 1907. Scientists were discovering various synthetic vitamins that could be used to treat illnesses such as Scurvy and Rickets that were caused by Vitamin deficiencies. Rockefeller thought that Petrochemicals could also be used to create vitamins and medications. Petrochemicals would allow Rockefeller to monopolize another industry in addition to oil. Business-wise, Rockefeller could patent these Petrochemicals and sell them for immense profits. Rockefeller acted quickly and purchased part of I.G. Farben - a German manufacturing company. Side Note: I.G. Farben supplied the Nazis during WWII. Yep, look it up. However, Rockefeller faced a major dilemma as he looked to monopolize medicine: Natural and herbal medicines were incredibly popular at the time due to the vitalists in medicine who were practicing the first version of decentralized medicine at the time. Many doctors and medical schools in the US were advocating practices born in NATURE as treatment & cures. Like he did for other competing oil companies, Rockefeller viewed natural remedies as his "competition" that needed to be decimated. Rockefeller teamed up with Andrew Carnegie and hired a man named Abraham Flexner through the Carnegie Foundation to do just that. He decided to control the curriculum of all US medical schools to change the narrative with propaganda.

@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist 🟩🔆

@JuicefBukele Flexner’s role was to travel the US and review Medical schools & hospitals across the country. This led to the Flexner Report which resulted in the closure of almost 50% of all medical schools.

@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist 🟩🔆

7. Natural medicines, uses of electric and magnetic currents, and chiropractic care, were utterly decimated in the report. Some holistic doctors were even jailed. Rockefeller also donated a whopping $100M to colleges and hospitals under his philanthropic group called the General Education Board. Flexner's report got us away from bioelectricity and toward the biochemical pathway before the discovery of DNA in 1953. This is when centralized medicine became an NGO of the Rockefeller foundation to ruin the health of North America. This was payback to Teddy Roosevelt. The goal was to bankrupt the US by creating a paradigm of sickness. Every American was now viewed as a customer in sick care. If you cured them the Rockefeller Foundation lost money through their Big Pharma subsidiaries. This is how Harvard, the Mayo Clinic, & Johns Hopkins came to dominate modern centralized medicine and policy. Nothing in this paradigm is evidence-based when you control the curriculum being TAUGHT and the research that gets funded and published as we saw in the pandemic era. The DNA discovery entrenched us in the Rockefeller paradigm of drugs over Nature. In a short period of time, medical schools & hospitals were homogenized with the same approach. Their curricula became the first algorithm used in medicine to suit a profiteer. Medicine was just about patented drugs, not utilizing holistic & natural approaches as treatment. Rockefeller's next step was to launch a smear campaign against his holistic "competitors." Homeopathy and Natural Medicines were quickly discredited by the newspapers and media outlets. He used the media as his propaganda machine to create Big Pharma.

@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist 🟩🔆

8. Rockefeller's approach worked incredibly well as he decimated the decentralized competition in healthcare and ultimately created our current centralized medical system. This system continues today: Big Pharma makes large donations to medical schools in exchange for these schools to prescribe their drugs. They also buy most of the ads on media and these are their current marketing arms to push narratives they want pushed into your consciousness. This is why people think these tertiary care centers of excellent are good places........... They are sausage factories for patients' tissues and lives. Again, this post is not to bash Western centralized Medicine. It is to spread SUNSHINE on show the unfiltered history of John D. Rockefeller and the role he played in shaping our current centralized healthcare system.

@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist 🟩🔆

9. The next time your CENTRALIZED doctor spends 3 minutes with you during your visit and you feel like a "customer" instead of a patient and you get handed an Rx for all your ills and complaints, this post will hopefully give you clarity on why it is happening. Not surprisingly, the cost of medical care in the US is #1 in the world, yet our quality is ranked at #37. Yet, some people I have recently met thought that following the Tertiary care centers pathways in healthcare were WISE? Some bridges need to be burned down so we never go down them again.

@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist 🟩🔆

10. It is your responsibility to be the DECENTRALIZED CEO of your own health. At the end of the day, no one cares about your own health more than you. Take in a variety of different inputs and make the decision of what is in your best interest. Food is the fuel of the mitochondrial engines. The Mitochondrial engines are quantum photomultipliers of food's electromagnetic bar code built by the sun and Earth's environments. Food changes as the sun varies and the environment on Earth changes. Start seeing the sun and Earth's environment that determine how your engines operate. Start seeing your food and lifestyle as a version of decentralized medicine. Be intentional about where you source your food and the amount of sun and darkness at night you get to improve the sleep you get. Use these as your pillars to THRIVE. Just how good has the Mayo Clinic been for the Public Health The ROI of centralized medicine in one chart.

@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist 🟩🔆

11. Never Forget it was the Mayo Clinic, Harvard, and Johns Hopkins led the charge to this demise over the last three years. Remember what the mandate was pushing and who created it. Aftermarket data: A great deal of intelligence has been invested in the ignorance of modern centralized healthcare. We can now see that in the mRNA experiment done globally over the last two years. The Morbidity and Mortality conference of the actions of the players should get them all fired and thrown in jail.

@EthicalSkeptic - Ethical Skeptic ☀

Not only are \/ more likely to catch Covid, this effect is increasing starkly as the total count of Covid cases falls. Relative Risk Factor jumped from 2.7 to 3.0 in a week. At this point, the \/ is artificially prolonging variant lifespan - allowing mutations time to spawn.

@EthicalSkeptic - Ethical Skeptic ☀

Well I was wrong, the Walgreen's site was not pulled - just down. But I was not wrong on the relative risk of infection if one is \/-d. And that is proving out well. This was an pretty important point to be BS'ing about (confounding!!) trolls. People were ill-advised by you.

@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist 🟩🔆

12. Future centralized doctors are ill-prepared for a world of patients bathing in nnEMF that changes how organic chemistry operates in cells. Hire decentralized docs who aced organic chemistry and every other type of chemistry associated with the biophysics of life. I wonder if med school admissions departments will get the names of the premed students who signed this petition? It seems like an important piece of info when considering their fitness for medicine, no?https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/03/us/nyu-organic-chemistry-petition.html

At N.Y.U., Students Were Failing Organic Chemistry. Who Was to Blame? Maitland Jones Jr., a respected professor, defended his standards. But students started a petition, and the university dismissed him. nytimes.com

@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist 🟩🔆

13. This is how centralized medicine PEER review is done, folks. If you can get a study to support your drug... you publish it. If the trial failed you disregard it. It's called publication bias. It sits at the deceit of the centralized system of medicine. When you consider the totality of the scientific evidence you quickly discover antidepressants are a placebo with horrible side effects & potential for serious adverse consequences. Unfortunately, most doctors are not even aware of this and with Google patrolling and changing how search is done, any non-suspecting person will just do a quick Google search & read a biased study claiming this drug works. Always question Big Pharma's claim of evidence.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Must watch to understand how “peer reviewed” science is fully captured.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses the issue of biased publication in medical studies. They explain that when only certain studies are published, it can create a skewed perspective. They mention a study where the FDA reevaluated 74 registered studies on antidepressants and found that the published articles overwhelmingly portrayed positive results. However, when the FDA reviewed all the studies, they found that there was an equal number of studies showing that antidepressants do not work. The speaker also mentions that industry-sponsored studies are more likely to go unpublished if they show negative results. This selective publication creates a misleading perception of the effectiveness of certain medications.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Because if you only publish certain ones, you can get a very biased view. So say you have a, you know, a coin and you flip heads or tails. Every time it's heads, you you count it. Every time it's tail, you just kind of hide it, right? That's that's going to give you a biased view of what's happening. Well, This is what they did in this study is that they took 74 FDA registered studies, of which 31 percent were never published. And the FDA sort of reevaluated all these studies and decided, was it did it support the use of antidepressants or did it not support the use of depressants. And this is what they found was that if you look at the journals the way they were published. So there's almost 50, articles published on various antidepressants. So you can see that almost all the studies that were published were positive. So if you were a a doctor, you'd say, wow, it is overwhelmingly positive. Like, there is clear evidence from this evidence based medicine that antidepressants are good medications. When the FDA went back and said, let's look at all the publications let's look at the way they're published and if they're and we're going to make our own determination if they're good or bad. This is actually what the FDA found of the exact same trials. It's like fiftyfifty. They don't really work. There's equal number of studies that show that this the antidepressants don't work as to show it works. But if you're looking at the journal version of it, you'd say, as an evidence based medicine practitioner, I think this stuff really works. But in fact, it's actually a toss-up and it's because of selective publication. So yet another way that the they they they bias it in favor of it. So you can look at neurodegenerative, diseases, for example, so discontinuation and non publication. While 12% of trials were discontinued, And if you look at if they're sponsored by industry versus university sponsored, what you see is that there's 5 times more likely to be unpublished than those from the industry. And it's like, of course. If the industry, if big pharma does a study that shows that its drug is no good, it has the option of not publishing it. Why? Because it paid for it. So it simply gets rid of it. And that's how you wind up in this mess where you Think that there's something very, very beneficial when it's actually not beneficial in the least.

@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist 🟩🔆

14. In a very short time, Rockefeller obtained his goal of paying back the US gov't for breaking up his Oil empire. Medical colleges at the time were all streamlined and homogenized. All the students were learning the same thing, and medicine was all about using patented drugs from his new companies spun off in NJ from Standard Oil. CENTRALIZED Scientists received huge grants to study how plants cured diseases, but their goal was to first identify which chemicals in the plant were effective, and then recreate a similar chemical – but not identical – in the lab that could be patented. This is how the shill PhD was born. A pill for the ill became the mantra of modern centralized medicine. No one has wrecked more damage to the public health than the Rockefeller Foundation. So, now we are, 100 years later, churning out centralized doctors who know nothing about the benefits of nutrition or herbs or any Natural practices around light water and magnetism and mitochondrial DNA. We have an entire society that is enslaved to corporations for its well-being. America spends 15% of its GDP on healthcare, which should be really called “sick care.” It is focused not on cure, but only on symptoms, thus creating repeat customers. There is no cure for cancer, diabetes, autism, asthma, or even flu. Why would there be real cures? This is a system founded by oligarchs and plutocrats, not by doctors.

@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist 🟩🔆

15. I'd heard a reference to sunlight containing Lithium via a song by Sting .... "Lithium Sunset" When asked about the sun he said..... “The idea for this song came to me when I was in Brazil, I have a great fondness for Brazil, and I met what I can best describe as a shaman (who happens to have a degree in Chemistry). He was explaining something to me, he was saying that sunlight is composed of a lot of elements and one of them is Lithium, as you know, Lithium is a medication given to the depressed, it’s a very successful drug. But it actually exists in sunlight and at sunrise and sunset you can look into the sun without damage the eye does not filter yellow light so the Lithium goes straight to the brain. This is why people get a great deal of comfort and solace from looking at the sunset or the sunrise. So I wrote a song called “Lithium Sunset” which is an ode to this natural medication that is available to all.” Sting (422) How can light contain Lithium doc ....? This doesn't make sense. Dr. Kruse responds: Don all elements on the periodic table have a specific light frequency they emit and this is their light fingerprint. This fingerprint can travel 93 million miles to Earth to interact with chemicals that contain this element and it will react to this similar frequency via a vibration. We call this molecular resonance. I have written extensively about it in the blog and on my forum. You need to understand how this light fingerprint can be used to activate Lithium in your brain to change your mood. That is how all elements and all bio-molecules work. We've been conditioned to believe it is a lock and key mechanism but this is a very simplistic linear way of thinking about chemistry. Light controls all chemicals by imparting information and energy to their valence electrons and once the light frequency matches the element or chemical the distant element or chemical reacts. This is how sunlight can affect a depressed brain. It turns out lithium light from the sun is more abundant in AM and sunset light so Sting was right about his song. In fact, he used this to stimulate his own creativity when he had writer's block in his career. So let me give you some deep basics about how this works in you......... Human skin's optical window is tight and is between 500nm -1000nm. 42 %-49% of sunlight is IR-A light. IR-A light has a wavelength of 0.75–1.4 µm IR-A frequencies range is 214–400 THz The electron volts of IR-A is 886–1653 meV and its temperature range is 3,864–2,070 K (3,591–1,797 °C) The human eye cannot see it but these frequencies are present all the time when sunlight is present and this light innovates quantum solutions for living things. Each chemical bond in a molecule vibrates at a frequency characteristic of that bond. A group of atoms in a molecule (e.g., CH2) may have multiple modes of oscillation caused by the stretching and bending motions of the group as a whole. If an oscillation leads to a change in dipole in the molecule then it will absorb a photon that has the same frequency. The vibrational frequencies of most molecules correspond to the frequencies of infrared light. Infrared radiation is emitted or absorbed by molecules when they change their rotational-vibrational movements. It excites vibrational modes in a molecule through a change in the dipole moment, making it a useful frequency range for the study of these energy states for molecules of the proper symmetry. When hormones are altered so they can be patented these small changes alter their dipole moment and change chemistry in some small way but can have huge implications when this chemical interacts with light via the optical window of the skin. When you know better........you do better. This is DECENTRALAIZED MEDICINE.

@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist 🟩🔆

16. When your melatonin/cortisol rhythm is off due to dark indoor days and bright artificially lit nights, not only are you affecting sleep and hormone levels, but you are also changing the size and shape of your mitochondria which changes your magnesium levels in the matrix and its hydration shell. This leads to energy inefficiency and age/disease acceleration. Did you know the size and shape of your hydration shell of magnesium is the ion lever that red light from the sun works on to change energy dynamics in the mitochondrial matrix? This is DECENTRALIZED MEDICINE. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4284776/

Protecting the Melatonin Rhythm through Circadian Healthy Light Exposure Currently, in developed countries, nights are excessively illuminated (light at night), whereas daytime is mainly spent indoors, and thus people are exposed to much lower light intensities than under natural conditions. In spite of the positive impact ... ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist 🟩🔆

17. We know that there are several exceptions in the standard genetic code for codons but over the 3.8 billion years of evolution, there is only one codon as methionine code for tryptophan. That is an extraordinary fact. It is as extraordinary as DHA never being replaced in 600 million years of eukaryotic evolution in the nervous system and in cell membranes. It is so extraordinary that there must be a missing role in biology that has yet to be discovered about why this is true. This blog is about that reason. THIS IS DECENTRALIZED MEDICINE. https://www.patreon.com/posts/19082581

QT#14: METHIONINE AND TRYPTOPHAN ARE TIME CRYSTALS | Patreon Join Dr. Jack Kruse on Patreon to get access to this post and more benefits. patreon.com

@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist 🟩🔆

18. So you might be wondering if DHA is so critical to humans how did it show up on Earth initially? Before DHA, Molybdenum was the key element for bacteria and archaea that used the sun for energy. The clocks in us measure and control the flow of entropy in us. The time stamping of light and dark on post-translational DNA by the mt DNA is how DECENTRALIZED MEDICINE WORKS. It is time you all wake up and stop supporting the criminals who created centralized healthcare. https://www.patreon.com/posts/55049793

CPC #56: DHA, information theory, thermodynamics, semiconduction | Patreon Join Dr. Jack Kruse on Patreon to get access to this post and more benefits. patreon.com

@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist 🟩🔆

19. THE LESSON IS OVER. REJECT CENTRALIZED IDEAS IN HEALTHCARE. Most of them are bad for you and good for the progeny of Rockefeller's plan. https://t.co/HKOSgLwkff

Saved - November 25, 2023 at 12:29 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In the past, people were healthier without strict diets or fitness trends. However, several factors have contributed to our declining health. Medication usage has skyrocketed, saturated fats were wrongly demonized, and processed foods have become prevalent. Lack of exercise, vitamin D deficiency, nutrient depletion, dangerous plastics, excessive childhood vaccines, environmental toxins, and harmful cosmetic ingredients also play a role. Oral contraceptives and government actions further impact our health negatively. To combat these issues, prioritize eating saturated fats, reducing carbs and sugars, growing your own food, exercising regularly, and getting sunlight. There are more strategies to lead a healthy life without conforming to societal norms.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

Until the 1970, the majority of the people were fit as a fiddle! No keto, vegan, or paleo diets. No home aerobics or gym memberships. No fancy fitness tech or wellness influencers. They also weren't drinking protein shakes or counting calories. So, what went wrong? A THREAD 🧵⬇️

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#1 Medication. In the 1970s, the average American spent 10 times less on prescription drugs than now. Contrary to popular belief, people in Western countries are also compelled to take potentially lethal drugs. Instead of addressing root causes, end-of-pipe solutions are applied.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#2 Demonization of Saturated Fats. Since the 60s, it's been claimed that saturated fats cause heart attacks. Although we've been nourished by lard & butter for thousands of years, these good fats were replaced with inflammatory omega-6 fatty acids. "Trust the science," they said!

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#3 Dietary Poisoning. Processed foods are abundant. Omega-6-rich seed oils and sugars are found in almost everything, an awful combination that overworks our livers and ramps up fat storage. Grandma's home-cooked meals are now a rare treat. We've traded real food for convenience.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#4 Lack of Exercise. Before exercise got labeled as some far-right gig, people were already moving less and sitting more. As we've shifted towards a service-based society and due to the rise of Big Tech, we're now mostly parked behind screens. More scrolling, less strolling.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#5 Vitamin D Deficiency. Our sedentary lifestyle leads to another serious issue. Almost no one who works indoors maintains adequate vitamin D levels. What many don't know is that there's no such thing as flu season—it's actually vitamin D deficiency season.https://sunfluencer.com/attain-50-ng-ml-vitamin-d-swiftly/

Boost Your Health: Attain 50 ng/mL Vitamin D Swiftly | Sunfluencer Learn about immune system reliance on vitamin D, the need for optimal vitamin D levels of >50 ng/mL, and a tailored supplementation protocol. sunfluencer.com

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#6 Lack of Nutrients. Topsoil depletion and removal mean that crops are coming up short on nutrients. To get the same vitamins from one head of lettuce 100 years ago, you'd need to eat 10 heads now. If your body is starved of nutrients, you want to eat more—a vicious cycle. https://t.co/ew4I9wus5q

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#7 Dangerous Plastics. Phthalates in plastics disrupt hormone functions and can lead to hormonal imbalances, increasing the risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes. Their widespread use in everyday products raises significant health concerns due to these metabolic effects. https://t.co/vhDm2kBRdB

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#8 Childhood Vaccines. While children in the 60s only received 5 doses of vaccines, by 2019 the number had risen to 72 - and the trend is rising. Each vaccination has an impact on the microbiome, which likely leads to significant long-term physical and psychological consequences. https://t.co/xJQLYUiGTQ

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#9 Environmental Toxins. Glyphosate-based herbicides like Roundup can cause dysbiosis, cancers, and many other diseases. For instance, in almost 100% of soy crops, glyphosate residues can be found, which then enter our food chain. It's seriously concerning. https://t.co/8qxujCRO8M

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#10 Dangers in Cosmetics. Aluminum in deodorants, a common cosmetic ingredient, has been associated with skin irritation and potential health risks, including disrupting hormonal balance and cancer. Its absorption through the skin from daily use has significant long-term effects. https://t.co/AbdcJSOVb3

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#11 Oral Contraceptives. They affect not only women but also men, as they are excreted via urine into the water supply. They are also extremely powerful and have highly negative effects on human health. Still wondering why there are that many men who think they can get pregnant? https://t.co/mPhYgFiGWx

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#12 I am writing this thread because we are definitely moving in the wrong direction. Our governments held us all hostage for three years, claiming it was for our health, but as I demonstrate, it's not about our health but about enslaving us with as little resistance as possible. https://t.co/o0lKCeVVn0

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#13 But there are many things you can do about it: ▪️Eat saturated fats and cut out seed oils ▪️Limit carbs and sugars ▪️Grow your own food in your self-made compost ▪️Exercise at least 3 times a week ▪️Be in the sun as much as possible and supplement with @sunfluencer or alike

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#14 But there are many more strategies that you can use to lead a healthy & fulfilled life without having to bow to the establishment. I regularly tweet about this while confronting those who have discriminated against us in recent years. Follow me—570k followers can't be wrong. https://t.co/OYksaEG8zz

Saved - November 25, 2023 at 5:51 PM

@BrianRoemmele - Brian Roemmele

“By 2045 half of men in the US will have no viable sperm”-Professor Shanna Swan AI doom? The real doom is we spray and eat pesticides that change our hormones and mental expressions of who we think we are. We don’t need AI to end us. We did it. https://t.co/oYm5WuJCiT

Video Transcript AI Summary
In Western and Asian countries, the average number of children per couple is below the replacement level of 2.1. The decline in birth rates has been most severe in Asian countries, with Korea recently reaching a low of 1.0 children per couple. Since 1960, the most populous countries have experienced the greatest decline in birth rates. This decline is happening globally and is a problem.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It is true that the being below replacement, the value of 2.1 children per couple is, more common in Western countries and actually, as you say, in Asian countries. That's where it's most severe. The lowest point, I believe, has been reached of one 0.0 children per couple, reached in Korea just recently. But, that's the rate of decline since 1960 of the most populous countries has been greatest. They are also declining. They're declining faster. So it's going on everywhere and, it's a problem.
Saved - December 13, 2023 at 5:38 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A 5-month study by the Associated Press reveals that 41 million Americans consume a daily "Pharma cocktail" in their drinking water. Acetaminophen, ibuprofen, mood stabilizers, antibiotics, heart drugs, cholesterol drugs, and sex hormones are present. Surprisingly, the government doesn't monitor water for pharmaceuticals.

@bambkb - Kevin - WE THE PEOPLE❤️ - DAD🦁 🐉 🔥

🚨🚨🚨The associated press did a 5 month study of your DRINKING water in 50 USA 🇺🇸 states🧐 Do you know what they found? 41 million Americans are drinking a Pharma cocktail on a daily basis : “Acetaminophen, ibuprofen, mood stabilizers, antibiotics, angina/heart/cholesterol drugs and sex hormones are found in the drinking water!!! The government doesn’t check the water for pharmaceuticals”😳😳

Video Transcript AI Summary
Pharmaceuticals like Ibuprofen, Caffeine, and Monocin are present in our drinking water, along with many others. A study conducted by the Associated Press found drugs in the water of 24 major cities across the US, affecting around 41 million Americans. The range of pharmaceuticals discovered includes epilepsy medication, mental health medicines, mood stabilizers, antibiotics, heart and cholesterol drugs, and even sex hormones. The issue lies in the fact that the federal government does not specifically test for pharmaceuticals in water, and there is currently no effective method to remove them from treatment plants.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 6 pharmaceuticals in our drinking water here. They include Ibuprofen, Caffeine, Monocin, and about 3 or 4 others. In Philadelphia, they had 56 pharmaceuticals or byproducts. They range everything from epilepsy medication to mental health medicines to, pharmaceuticals that really run the gamut. Here's the bottom line from the Associated Press on the study they did. It was, as you mentioned, a 5 month investigation involving the AP investigative team. Fifty major cities in 50 states were looked at, and drugs were found in the water of 24 major cities. We're talking 41,000,000 Americans here who drink that water. So what's in the water? Everything from acetaminophen and Ibuprofen to mood stabilizers, antibiotics, angina, heart, as well as cholesterol drugs, and even sex hormones. The trouble here, Miek, is that the federal government does not test specifically for pharmaceuticals in the water. And in fact, there is no way to scrub water that is in a treatment plant for pharmaceuticals.
Saved - January 2, 2024 at 5:08 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
SSRI antidepressants have been linked to suicides and acts of violence, with individuals experiencing agitation, psychosis, and sometimes becoming violently psychotic. The evidence connecting SSRIs to violent and psychotic behavior has been covered up by manufacturers and regulators. Despite being on the warning label, this link is often dismissed as a conspiracy theory. Follow @MidwesternDoc for more information.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Do SSRI Antidepressants Cause Mass Shootings? A Closer Look at Decades of Evidence • Once the SSRIs entered the market, there has been a wave of SSRI suicides and unspeakable acts of violence. • SSRI antidepressants have a variety of horrendous side effects. These include sometimes causing the individual to become agitated, feeling they can’t be in their skin, turning psychotic, and occasionally becoming violently psychotic. • During these psychoses, individuals can have out of body experiences where they commit lethal violence either to themselves or others. • As lawsuits later showed, this violent behavior (and the frequent suicides that followed it) were observed throughout the SSRI clinical trials, but were covered up by the SSRI manufacturers and then the drug regulators (e.g., the FDA). • Sadly, the idea that SSRIs could cause any of this has always been viewed as a “conspiracy theory” or “mistaking correlation with causation” because very few are aware of the extensive evidence linking SSRIs to violent and psychotic behavior—despite it now being on the warning label of those drugs. This post was a condensed version of an article written by @MidwesternDoc (give him a follow). Repost to bring debate to this important topic — and read @MidwesternDoc's entire article in the comments below.

Saved - March 23, 2024 at 4:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
New research reveals that excessive exposure to activin A in the womb hinders proper testes development in male fetuses. Surprisingly, SSRIs increase activin A production in women. This study is the first to demonstrate the negative effects of heightened activin A levels caused by endocrine-disrupting substances. The research also found that activin A damages both germ cells and Leydig cells, reducing sperm precursor cells and testosterone production. Maintaining optimal activin A levels is crucial for healthy fetal testis development and future reproductive health outcomes. Studies show that activin A levels significantly increase in pregnant women on antidepressants, yet advice from Johns Hopkins suggests it is safe to take SSRIs during pregnancy.

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

New research has shown that too much exposure to a growth factor called activin A in the womb prevents the proper development of the testes in male fetuses. And what increases activin A production in women? SSRIs. Women are generally told SSRIs are safe during pregnancy. 👇

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

The research, published in Frontiers in Endocrinology, is the first to show that increased exposure to activin A leads to some of the worst effects caused by endocrine-disrupting substances.

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

The researchers showed that elevated activin A not only damages germ cells (sperm precursors) but also the Leydig cells, which produce testosterone in men. "Unusually, germ cells exposed to high activin A frequently contained more than one nucleus (multinucleated—see image below) and were abnormally localized outside of the testis cords, reducing the number of sperm precursor cells at birth by half," one of the researchers said.

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

"We also discovered that several enzymes necessary for steroid production were lower in Leydig cells in these mice, leading to reduced production of the masculinizing factors." "Like the Goldilocks story, too much or too little activin A is detrimental to fetal testis development," the researcher added. "It is important that activin A levels are 'just right' to ensure the correct foundation is built for future reproductive health outcomes."

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

Here's one of many studies showing significant elevation of activin A levels in maternal blood, amniotic fluid and fetal cord blood during pregnant if the mother is on antidepressants. 17.7% of women in the US are on antidepressants.

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

Here's advice from Johns Hopkins saying it's fine to take SSRIs during pregnancy and, in fact, it may be a risk for women to come off them during or before pregnancy.

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

Here's a link to the new study: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/endocrinology/articles/10.3389/fendo.2023.1234712/full

Frontiers | Testis exposure to unopposed/elevated activin A in utero affects somatic and germ cells and alters steroid levels mimicking phthalate exposure Correct fetal testis development underpins adult male fertility, and TGFβ superfamily ligands control key aspects of this process. Transcripts encoding one s... frontiersin.org
Saved - July 5, 2024 at 4:27 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Tampons are found to be laced with heavy metals like lead, arsenic, and cadmium, according to a recent study. All tested tampons contained lead, with organic brands having less lead but more arsenic. Vaginal tissue is highly absorbent, so regular tampon use may increase heavy metal concentrations in the body. Women's sanitary products are also contaminated with endocrine-disruptors, carcinogens, and obesogens. The study suggests finding alternative options to store-bought sanitary products due to their contamination and direct exposure to the bloodstream.

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

TAMPONS ARE LACED WITH HEAVY METALS. A new study shows that tampons are laced with heavy metals including lead, arsenic and cadmium. Every single tampon tested in the study had lead in it. 👇

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

The researchers analysed 60 tampons representing 14 different brands from the US, UK and EU. These included name brands and store-brand products. The samples were tested using a process called inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) to identify metals present.

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

The researchers found lead and cadmium in 100% of samples. Arsenic was detected in 95% of samples. Interestingly, the highest concentrations were for zinc and calcium. UK and EU tampons generally had lower quantities of metals in them than US tampons.

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

While organic brands generally had less lead, they had more arsenic.

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

It's unclear what the effects of this contamination are at this point, but it's worth pointing out that vaginal tissue is among the most absorbent tissue in the body. It's likely that regular use of tampons increases concentrations of heavy metals like lead, arsenic and cadmium in the body, which is not a good thing.

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

It's estimated that the average woman will use 11,000 tampons in her lifetime, amounting to 1,800 days or five full years of intimate exposure to whatever substances are on those tampons.

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

Women's sanitary products are massively contaminated, not just with heavy metals but also with endocrine-disruptors, carcinogens and obesogens. https://www.raweggstack.com/p/study-analysis-endocrine-disruptors

STUDY ANALYSIS: Endocrine Disruptors in Women's Menstrual Products With endocrine disruptors being, quite literally, everywhere, it's no surprise they're all over sanitary pads and other menstrual products raweggstack.com

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

My recommendation, honestly, is to find an alternative to store-bought sanitary products. The same goes for nappies, which suffer from exactly the same problems. These products are hopelessly contaminated and provide a direct route of exposure into the bloodstream.

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

Here's the new study: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412024004355#f0020

Tampons as a source of exposure to metal(loid)s Between 52–86% of people who menstruate in the United States use tampons—cotton and/or rayon/viscose ‘plugs’—to absorb menstrual blood in the vagina. … sciencedirect.com
Saved - October 16, 2024 at 1:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been reflecting on the troubling realities of antidepressants, particularly SSRIs. They haven't been proven effective for most people, and many stop taking them due to severe side effects, including increased suicidal tendencies and sexual dysfunction. Withdrawal symptoms are often misinterpreted as signs of needing more medication. The widespread use of these drugs has profound societal impacts, and while they may help a small subset of patients, the majority see no benefit. I highly recommend reading @MidwesternDoc's article for anyone considering quitting these medications.

@PierreKory - Pierre Kory, MD MPA

Antidepressants were never proven to treat depression (it's not a "chemical imbalance") and 56% of patients stop them due to side effects like: •A 255% increase in suicidal tendencies •59% getting depressing sexual dysfunction •30% becoming Bipolar https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-are-antidepressants-so-harmful

Why Are Antidepressants So Harmful? Exploring the common side effects of SSRIs and the nightmare of quitting them. midwesterndoctor.com

@PierreKory - Pierre Kory, MD MPA

One of the most insidious effects of the drugs is that they are dosed such that they cause withdrawals—46% of users who stop experiencing severe ones that often last for months. Yet when this happens, it gets labeled as a sign the drug was working and they need more of it.

@PierreKory - Pierre Kory, MD MPA

Summary of @MidwesternDoc's article: •SSRI antidepressants are one of the most harmful medications on the market, and because of just how many people they are given to (often for no good reason) they have had a profound effect on the consciousness of our entire society. •This article will review some of the more common side effects of SSRIs (and SNRIs), such as becoming numb to life, becoming severely agitated and imbalanced (sometimes to the point one becomes violently psychotic), losing your mind, losing the ability to have sex, and the development of birth defects. •Unfortunately, due to widespread denial in psychiatry about the issues with their drugs the common SSRI side effects are often misinterpreted as a sign the individual had a pre-existing mental illness and needs more of the drug—which all too often then leads to catastrophic events for the over-medicated patient. •Like many other stimulant drugs (e.g., cocaine) SSRIs are highly addictive. Because of this, patients will get severely ill when they attempt to stop them (withdrawals affect roughly half of SSRI users) and it is often extremely difficult to withdraw from them. This article, covers the approaches used to safely quit the drugs since very few resources exist for people in that situation.

@PierreKory - Pierre Kory, MD MPA

A big point that's not appreciated about SSRIs is that they help one subset of patients but excluding that metabolic subtype, no benefit occurs. However, despite most patients not benefitting from the drugs, they are still kept on them.

@PierreKory - Pierre Kory, MD MPA

I would highly recommend reading @MidwesternDoc's brilliant article if you are anyone you are close to is on these drugs and especially if they are considering quitting them (as doing so without guidance can be quite dangerous). https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-are-antidepressants-so-harmful

Why Are Antidepressants So Harmful? Exploring the common side effects of SSRIs and the nightmare of quitting them. midwesterndoctor.com
Saved - January 12, 2025 at 11:39 AM

@thehealthb0t - healthbot

ATRAZINE IS IN THE WATER AND YES IT TURNED THE FROGS GAY https://t.co/xEJYBc2mnD

Video Transcript AI Summary
Darnell, a genetic male, exhibits female behavior and lays eggs, having been exposed to atrazine throughout his life. This is Darnell's third clutch, and he has been copulating for nearly 24 hours. This situation is remarkable from a scientific perspective, yet it raises concerns. Atrazine is a common contaminant found in ground, surface, and drinking water, and the level that caused this male to develop female traits is three times lower than the permissible limit.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: These are both males. The the one on the bottom acting as the female, we affectionately refer to as Darnell. He's a genetic male that not only acts like a female, he lays eggs like a female. He, she has been exposed to atrazine all of her his, her life. I I don't even really know how to reference it. This is Darnell's 3rd clutch. So Darnell has sons and daughters that we've grown up. You can see eggs in the bottom. This is actually her 2nd clutch for today. He, she has been copulating for getting close to 24 hours now. This is probably one of the most remarkable things I've seen in in in my work. But I personally have mixed emotions. I'm very excited about the science and trying to understand the mechanism. But on the other hand, I am worried this is the most common contaminant in ground and surface water and drinking water. And the level of atrazine that it took to make this male turn into a female is 3 times less than what's allowed.
Saved - April 13, 2025 at 11:43 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been exploring the alarming effects of SSRIs, particularly their potential to increase suicidal thoughts by 255%. Clinical trials reveal that even healthy individuals can become suicidal after taking these medications. Users often report emotional numbness, with some feeling like they’ve lost their personalities. The risks extend beyond personal suffering, as SSRIs have been linked to psychotic violence and severe withdrawal symptoms. It’s crucial to question the narrative around these drugs and ensure informed consent for anyone considering them.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Horrific and Deadly Effects of Antidepressants Did you know that SSRI antidepressants INCREASE suicidal thoughts by 255%? A clinical trial on healthy volunteers found that 2 out of 20 became suicidal after taking Zoloft. One was literally on her way to kill herself when a timely phone call saved her life. But it’s not just suicidal thoughts that make antidepressants dangerous. And once you see what else these drugs are doing, you’ll never look at depression “treatment” the same way again. 🧵 THREAD

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors—or SSRIs—are one of the most harmful medicines prescribed today. And that’s saying a lot because the market is FULL of harmful medicines. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-are-antidepressants-so-harmful

Why Are Antidepressants So Harmful? Exploring the common side effects of SSRIs and the nightmare of quitting them. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

What’s so bad about these antidepressants? First of all, their use is widespread and frequently unjustifiable. They promise to be a magical solution to depression and anxiety, but it’s quite the opposite. In fact, they can cause side effects far worse than what they claim to treat.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

SSRIs don’t just dull your emotions, and they don’t alter your brain chemistry for the better. They literally reprogram your brain. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-dark-side-of-antidepressants?utm_source=publication-search

The Dark Side of Antidepressants Why are SSRIs so dangerous? midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Between 40% and 60% of users report emotional numbness. Not just negative emotions—all emotions. Joy, pain, motivation—all of it completely flatlined. Some describe it as “life without color” or a “zombie-like” existence. Sure, maybe you don’t feel depressed anymore. But you don’t feel anything at all. That sounds… terrible. Depression can be serious, but should we accept emotionless zombies as the alternative?

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

If you want to dig even deeper into the dark side of antidepressants and why they’re so harmful, check out @Midwesterndoc’s comprehensive report on the subject. And be sure to share this with anyone you know who may be considering starting an SSRI. midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-are-anti…

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc And it’s not just becoming an emotionless zombie you have to worry about. The emotional shutdown can lead to something that is much worse than depression and anxiety. Psychotic violence. midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-evidence…

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc I don’t mean just a little anger here and there. SSRIs are causing people to commit suicide—and yes, even horrific mass shootings.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc And guess what? The FDA knew about it. Prozac triggers hallucinations, mania, and violence, and the FDA has known all along. Even animals become aggressive on SSRIs. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-are-antidepressants-so-harmful?utm_source=publication-search

Why Are Antidepressants So Harmful? Exploring the common side effects of SSRIs and the nightmare of quitting them. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc But instead of going back to the drawing board, the FDA approved it anyway. After nine years on the market, 39,000 people reported major psychiatric events. And those are only the people who reported it… Really makes you question FDA approval, doesn’t it?

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Did you know most of the mass shooters we hear about in the news were often on SSRIs? It’s true. And the media even reported on it. But then, they stopped. That’s weird.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Many young men are prescribed psychotropic drugs, including SSRIs, which are meant to prevent crazy behavior. However, there may be a connection between these drugs and mass shootings. Examples include Eric Harris (Columbine), Kip Kinkel, Jeff Weesa, Steven Kamerzac, James Holmes, Aaron Alexis, and Dylann Roof, all of whom were reportedly taking SSRIs. Between 1991 and 2018, SSRI prescriptions rose by over 3000%, yet the suicide rate jumped by 35% during the same period, and mass shootings also increased. SSRIs are labeled as increasing the risk of anxiety, agitation, hostility, aggressiveness, impulsivity, and mania. An FDA meta-study indicated an increased suicide rate in young people prescribed SSRIs. Between 2015 and 2019, SSRI use by teens rose by nearly 40%. In 2020, the pharmaceutical industry spent over $4.5 billion on national television advertising. Pfizer spent more on advertising than on research and development, and their revenue doubled. News coverage, including from outlets like CNBC and CNN, is often sponsored by Pfizer.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They're numbed by the endless psychotropic drugs that are handed out in every school in the country by crackpots posing as counselors. So a lot of young men in America are going nuts. Are you surprised? And by the way, a shockingly large number of them have been prescribed psychotropic drugs by their doctors, SSRIs or antidepressants, and that would include quite a few mass shooters. And keep in mind, again, these drugs are meant to prevent crazy behavior. And yet there seems to be a connection. Eric Harris, the Columbine killer, was in both Zoloft and Luvox. A year earlier, a 15 year old called Kip Kinkel shot his parents and dozens of classmates. He was on Prozac. In 02/2005, a 16 year old called Jeff Weesa killed his grandfather and 10 kids in Minnesota. He was on Prozac too. So was 27 year old Steven Kamerzac, who murdered six people at Northern Illinois University. In 02/2012, you may recall when 25 year old James Holmes walked into a movie theater and shot 82 people. He was on Zoloft. The list goes on and on and on and on. It includes the shooter at the Washington Navy Yard in 2013. That would be 34 year old Aaron Alexis. It also includes Dylann Roof. He's the 21 year old who shot up the church in Charleston. Now he was apparently a racist, and we've heard a lot about that. Fine. But we've heard next to nothing about the fact that he was taking SSRIs. He and many, many others. You're not supposed to notice, but some have. The Journal of Political Psychology once assembled a list of dozens more mass killings all committed by young people, young men on prescription drugs. So is there a connection? Well, we don't know definitively. We do know there are a whole lot more of these drugs being taken by kids than ever before. And by the entire population, who's not taking some prescription medication at this point? Between 1991 and 02/2018, total SSRI prescriptions in The United States rose by more than 3000%. Three thousand %. Three thousand % of anything is a massive change. You don't see changes like that. But the point of this change was to make Americans calmer, saner, happier. Take these drugs and your problems will go away. Yes. You will become numb. You will lose part of yourself. You no longer experience deep joy. You'll become part robot, but at least you won't wanna kill yourself or harm other people. That was the promise. 3000%. Did it work? Let's see. Over the very same period, the suicide rate in The United States jumped by thirty five percent. Did it work? Well, millions of people got an anti suicide drugs, and we wound up with many more suicides. So maybe it's not working. Is it possible it's making the problem worse? You think? Let's see. Mass shootings also increased dramatically over the very same period. Here's a chart that shows it. Now the halfwits on Twitter always scream the same thing. Correlation is not causation. Alright. Whatever that means. But tell us, halfwits, what is going on exactly? What what does that chart mean? We know that SSRIs are dangerous. It says so right on the label. They increase, quote, the risk of anxiety, agitation, irritability, hostility, aggressiveness, impulsivity, and mania. Oh, not a big deal. That's not causation. Then what is it? According to one meta study by the FDA, young people who've been prescribed SSRIs have an increased rate of suicide. Oh, wait. More suicide? Well, there's a reduced suicide, but we're getting more suicide. Let's let's stop right there. But we're not stopping. We're accelerating. Between 02/2015 and 02/2019, the use of SSRI drugs by teens in The United States rose by nearly forty percent. So it's not working. Let's do a whole lot more of it. This seems like a massive and extremely obvious problem. Extremely obvious. People aren't themselves. They're taking drugs that are appear to be causing the behavior that drugs are designed to prevent. Why don't they talk about this on TV? Oh, let's see. In 2020, the pharmaceutical industry spent more than $4,500,000,000 advertising on national television in this country. Now how much is that? Well, to put in some context, Pfizer spent more on advertising in 2020 than it did on research and development. But it wasn't a bad decision. It was a great decision. Pfizer's revenue doubled last year to more than $81,000,000,000. Now how'd they do that? Well, the ad campaign paid off. It helped convince politicians to require the entire population take Pfizer products, products that don't work as advertised, that have killed large numbers of people, and whose side effects are indemnified against lawsuits by the United States Congress. That's quite a business model. You'd might think it could be a subject of a media story, but no. No stories on Pfizer. They're paid to be fanboys of Pfizer, therefore they are. Here's a tweet, for example, from CNBC, which is ostensibly a news organization and we're quoting. Pfizer is uniquely positioned to advance mRNA, which could be a breakthrough for other infectious diseases, genetic diseases, and cancer, parenthesis. Paid post for Pfizer, hashtag ad. It's on their Twitter account, a news organization. They're admitting it's a paid post for Pfizer. But in CNBC's defense, they're not alone. Pretty much all the news coverage you see in The United States is a paid post for Pfizer. Watch this. Anderson Cooper three sixty brought to you Pfizer. CNN tonight brought to you by Pfizer. Oh, it's all brought to you by Pfizer. Now why is that? Because TV channels don't prescribe drugs. Doctors do. So why would Pfizer, a drug company, be advertising on television? Well, we're not sure of the answer. Let's put it this way. Don't hold your breath waiting for CNN or Good Morning America to do a hard hitting investigative piece on the potential connection between prescription drugs and violence. Probably not gonna happen since they sponsor those channels.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

So why are we “not allowed” to talk about SSRIs and violence anymore? It’s pretty simple. It would blow the lid off one of the most dangerous pharmaceutical cover-ups in modern history. It would expose the truth that Big Pharma knowingly released drugs that could make people snap and kill other people. And they just kept selling them anyway.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

But the psychotic violence caused by SSRIs is only the tip of the iceberg. Obviously, not everyone taking these drugs becomes a mass shooter. But that doesn’t mean the other side effects are any less terrible for those who experience them. SSRIs truly warp your mind, body, and emotions. And sometimes it is irreversible.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The numbers are truly chilling: → A 255% increase in suicidal thoughts → 30% of SSRI users develop Bipolar disorder → 59% suffer long-term sexual dysfunction With many saying their libido never came back even after stopping the drug. The science is clear. The harm caused by SSRIs greatly outweighs any benefits they provide. Talk about depressing…

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

A 2020 study involving 20 healthy volunteers with zero history of depression or other mental illnesses had shocking results. They were each given Zoloft. TWO of them BECAME suicidal. One of them was even on her way to kill herself when a divinely timed phone call interrupted her plans. These two study participants were still affected several months later. They were actually questioning the stability of their personalities. This doesn’t sound like a magic solution. This sounds like torture.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Speaking of stopping SSRIs—good luck! They are highly addictive. And it’s not just physical addiction. It’s neurological. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-hidden-dangers-of-antidepressants?utm_source=publication-search

The Hidden Dangers of Antidepressants and Why They're So Hard To Stop Taking Unveiling the Depression Industry midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

And because of what they do to the brain, it can take years to step down the dose and wean off of them. Years! Withdrawal symptoms include things like: - Brain zaps - Panic attacks - Suicidal spirals - Derealization And these symptoms can last weeks, months, or even years. It’s not uncommon to fail and continue taking them because the withdrawal is just that bad.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc A 2022 review found that 56% of users who tried to stop SSRIs experience withdrawal symptoms, and 46% describe it as severe. Psychiatrists mislabel it as a “relapse” and prescribe even more drugs. The system is set up to trap you. There’s no exit.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc And the most vulnerable groups? Pregnant women and children. Despite strong evidence linking SSRIs to birth defects, premature birth, and newborn death, the FDA still endorses their use during pregnancy. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-dark-side-of-antidepressants?utm_source=publication-search

The Dark Side of Antidepressants Why are SSRIs so dangerous? midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc One study showed a six times higher risk of pulmonary hypertension in newborns. Another study showed that SSRI babies lost height and weight in just 19 weeks. This isn’t good.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc SSRIs are being pushed on everyone. Especially vulnerable people like foster kids, parolees, prisoners, and elderly nursing home residents. And in many of these cases, there is no real ability for them to say no. That’s not mental health care. That’s drugging people.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc The industry tells us SSRIs are “fixing a serotonin imbalance.” But that’s a lie. There’s no solid evidence that depression is caused by low serotonin. So what’s the real mechanism at play here? SSRIs alter brain wiring. And obviously not always in good ways.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

SSRI users describe feeling like their “personality changed” after starting the drug. The reports are endless and absolutely chilling. Some were left numb for years. Others became aggressive, impulsive, or dissociated from reality. Many say they don’t recognize who they became after taking SSRIs. Excuse me… what?!

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

And of course, patients and their families are rarely warned about these effects. Most say they were never told about the risks. There was no informed consent. How can you not inform depressed people that their medication might make them suicidal? How is it even possible that we can be asking that question? They experienced these things and talked to their doctors. They were gaslit every step of the way.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc If you or someone you love is taking SSRIs or is considering taking them, I urge you to read the full report from @MidwesternDoc: midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-are-anti…

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

How many more people have to suffer before this ends? How many more people who reach out to their doctor because something is off and they’re looking for help are going to be hurt, sometimes permanently? It’s time to expose the cover-up and end Big Pharma’s abuse and gaslighting once and for all.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc RFK Jr. is right—this could finally be the turning point. For 40 years, this tragedy was hidden behind slick ads and corrupted science. But now it’s in the light and MAHA is ready to fight.

Video Transcript AI Summary
School and mass shootings are unacceptable and require investigation, specifically into why they occur in the U.S. and why they didn't happen previously. SSRIs, psychiatric drugs with potential homicidal and suicidal side effects, should be investigated as a possible culprit due to their widespread use. The NIH should study why the U.S. experiences mass shootings so frequently compared to countries like Switzerland, which has comparable gun ownership. The speaker notes that children previously brought rifles to school without causing harm, highlighting the unique nature of the current issue. The speaker intends to change the NIH policy that has prevented the study of the origins of gun violence since 1996.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The school shootings in this country, the mass shootings are unacceptable. And we need to be investigating why they're happening in this country. Why are we alone? Why is that happening? This why did it never happen before? Two of the culprits that ought to be investigated, and I'm not saying that we know this, but one is SSRIs, the widespread use of now of this class of psychiatric drugs that has a black box label on it saying may cause homicidal and suicidal behavior. And we now have a large part of the American population on those. NIH, the National Institute of Health, ought to be studying what are why is it that Switzerland, which has comparable levels of guns, has not had a mass shooting in twenty one years and we have one every twenty one hours? Why is that? That is you know, when I was a kid, kids my age were bringing their rifles to schools for shooting clubs. Nobody ever pointed that. Nobody ever started shooting at other children at schools. It just didn't ever happen before. This is unique in in human history and we need to be studying that. Since 1996, NIH has had a policy not to study the ideology of the origins of gun violence and I'm gonna change that.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc If you know anyone considering starting an SSRI, be sure to forward them this information. Because if you wait until after, it might be too late.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Horrific and Deadly Effects of Antidepressants Did you know that SSRI antidepressants INCREASE suicidal thoughts by 255%? A clinical trial on healthy volunteers found that 2 out of 20 became suicidal after taking Zoloft. One was literally on her way to kill herself when a timely phone call saved her life. But it’s not just suicidal thoughts that make antidepressants dangerous. And once you see what else these drugs are doing, you’ll never look at depression “treatment” the same way again. 🧵 THREAD

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Thanks for reading! This information was based on a report originally published by @MidwesternDoc. Key details were streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. Read the original report here. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-are-antidepressants-so-harmful

Why Are Antidepressants So Harmful? Exploring the common side effects of SSRIs and the nightmare of quitting them. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc For a deeper dive into what modern medicine has overlooked—or intentionally buried—check out these other eye-opening reports by @MidwesternDoc: The Great Cholesterol Scam and The Dangers of Statins https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-great-cholesterol-scam-and-the

The Great Cholesterol Scam and The Dangers of Statins Exploring the Actual Causes and Treatments of Heart Disease midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc What's The Healthiest Water To Drink? https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/whats-the-healthiest-water-to-drink

What's The Healthiest Water To Drink? April's Open Thread midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc The Forgotten Cancer Cure Hiding in Plain Sight https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-forgotten-cancer-cure-hiding

The Forgotten Cancer Cure Hiding in Plain Sight How DMSO turns a common dye into a highly potent cancer treatment that's harmless to normal tissue midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc While you’re at it, give @MidwesternDoc a follow. No one brings more research, clinical insight, or historical context when it comes to exposing the health myths we’ve all been fed. This is easily one of the most valuable accounts you’ll ever follow. --> @MidwesternDoc https://t.co/UyGgdL1avn

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc If you found this information valuable, do me a quick favor—share this thread with one friend and bookmark it for later. You might help someone who really needs it. Thread begins here: https://t.co/7YaXfY9KDV

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Horrific and Deadly Effects of Antidepressants Did you know that SSRI antidepressants INCREASE suicidal thoughts by 255%? A clinical trial on healthy volunteers found that 2 out of 20 became suicidal after taking Zoloft. One was literally on her way to kill herself when a timely phone call saved her life. But it’s not just suicidal thoughts that make antidepressants dangerous. And once you see what else these drugs are doing, you’ll never look at depression “treatment” the same way again. 🧵 THREAD

Saved - April 14, 2025 at 9:48 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discussed the alarming effects of Atrazine, a widely used herbicide, which has been linked to early puberty in girls and male feminization in frogs. The average age of puberty for girls in America is now 10, six years earlier than in 1900, largely due to exposure to xenoestrogens and pesticides like Atrazine. Despite being banned in 40 countries, Atrazine is still prevalent in North America, contaminating drinking water and food. Its health impacts include various cancers, hormonal imbalances, and reproductive issues.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

The Pesticide That Turns Male Frogs Into Females... Is The Same Pesticide Forcing Girls To Become Women At 10 Years Old...ATRAZINE... The average girl in America is hitting puberty, which is sexual maturity, 6 years earlier than they were in 1900. We have the earliest puberty rates of any continent in the world at age 10. Our cells are infiltrated by plastic Xenoestrogens & Pesticides activate estrogen receptors. We are literally giving children estrogen through all stages of development. The RUP Restricted Use Pesticide Atrazine Causes Male Feminization & Causes Females To Suffer From Estrogen Dominance. Male Frogs Turned Completely Female When Exposed To Only 0.1 - 2 ppb Atrazine. The EPA Allows 3 ppb In Our Drinking Water. In Europe, The Legal Limit Of Atrazine In Drinking Water Is ZERO! Atrazine is the 2nd most used Herbicide & RUP Restricted Use Pesticide in North America, 2nd only to Glyphosate. 85 million pounds are sprayed on crops annually. Despite it being banned by 40 other countries for dangerous health outcomes from exposure. Atrazine-laced runoff from crops then enters groundwater infiltrating tap water at unsafe levels. It does not degrade with heat or processing, so both food products & drinking water contain harmful levels. Chronic Health Conditions Caused By Atrazine To Both Men & Women: Breast Cancer Diabetes Osteoporosis Prostate Cancer Ovarian Cancer Cervical Cancer Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Shrinks Testicles Reduces Sperm Count Induces Ovaries Reduces Androgen Larynx Disrupts Gonadal Development Causes Testicular Lesions Chemical Castration Male Infertility Menstrual Cycle Irregularities Hormonal Imbalance Birth Defects Low Birth Rates 👇Atrazine: Complete Feminization Of Frogs👇 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2842049/ 👇Atrazine Hormonal Disruption👇 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935111002349 👇EWG Atrazine Research Article👇 https://www.ewg.org/news-insights/news/2018/09/epa-ignores-science-dismisses-risks-childrens-health-syngentas-atrazine Speaker: @CaseyMeansMD

Video Transcript AI Summary
American girls are entering puberty six years earlier than in 1900, with an average age of 10, the earliest in the world. This is largely attributed to estrogen exposure from plastics (xenoestrogens) and pesticides. Atrazine, a pesticide used in the U.S. at 70,000,000 pounds annually but illegal in Europe, can turn male frog embryos into females, demonstrating its endocrine-disrupting effects.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The average girl in America is getting hitting puberty, which is sexual maturity six years earlier than they were in 1900. We have the earliest puberty rates of any continent in the world. It's age 10, And this is in large part thought to do because of we are literally giving children estrogen with all the plastics we're ingesting, which are xenoestrogen, and the pesticides which can activate the estrogen receptors like atrazine. I mean, you can put atrazine, which is a pesticide that we spray about 70,000,000 pounds of in The US every year. It's not legal in Europe, but it's sold to us. And you put this on a developing male frog embryo and it turns into a female frog. That's how much of an estrogen disrupting an estrogen or endocrine disrupting chemical that it is.
Atrazine induces complete feminization and chemical castration in male African clawed frogs (Xenopus laevis) The herbicide atrazine is one of the most commonly applied pesticides in the world. As a result, atrazine is the most commonly detected pesticide contaminant of ground, surface, and drinking water. Atrazine is also a potent endocrine disruptor that ... pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Menstrual cycle characteristics and reproductive hormone levels in women exposed to atrazine in drinking water Atrazine is the most commonly used herbicide in the U.S. and a wide-spread groundwater contaminant. Epidemiologic and laboratory evidence exists that … sciencedirect.com
EPA Ignores the Science, Dismisses the Risks to Children’s Health From Syngenta’s Atrazine In a move that echoes pesticide industry wishes, the Environmental Protection Agency chose to ignore recent science and human health studies on atrazine, a weed-killer that turns male frogs into females and may increase the risk of cancer, the New York Times reported in August. ewg.org
Saved - April 29, 2025 at 1:26 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve uncovered a disturbing link between SSRIs and mass shootings, which was openly discussed in the 1990s but has since been buried. Despite evidence showing that these drugs can trigger violence, the FDA and Big Pharma have downplayed their risks. Many mass shooters had psychiatric histories involving SSRIs, yet the media remains silent. Withdrawal from these medications can be dangerous, and the industry continues to profit while victims suffer. It’s crucial to recognize the potential dangers of SSRIs and demand accountability from those responsible.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

EXPOSED: The Chilling SSRI Link to Mass Shootings In the early 1990s, major media outlets openly reported on the connection between Prozac, suicide, and murder. The public was warned that SSRIs could trigger mass violence. But then, in 1997, everything changed. What happened? And why did the media go silent? 🧵 THREAD

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

📌 Before we dive in, bookmark this thread. Only by uncovering the past can you truly understand how to repair the broken, corrupted system we’re living with today.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Big Pharma gaslit the world for decades. They said SSRIs are the silver bullet. They said they didn’t cause psychotic violence. Mentally ill people were just already dangerous. midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-evidence…

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

But hidden clinical trial data, black-box warnings, and bone-chilling real-world cases tell a completely different story. The truth is, SSRIs are not just correlated with violence—they cause it.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The FDA fought tooth and nail to block warning labels for SSRIs. Only after mass public pressure and mountains of evidence did a suicide warning finally get added—proving some level of causation.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

But as @MidwesternDoc's report details, they knew the truth all along. midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-evidence…

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

SSRIs like Prozac, Zoloft, and Paxil don’t just block serotonin—they hijack the brain’s reward system. It’s a lot like cocaine. After Prozac hit the market in 1988, the FDA received 39,000 adverse event reports. Really significant things like suicides, psychosis, and murders. And that was only the beginning.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc With so many red flags after it hit the market, you would have expected Prozac to be pulled. If not to protect people by regulating drugs, what exactly is the FDA for?

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc To truly understand how deep the corruption runs, check out @MidwesternDoc’s article exposing the FDA for what it really is. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-fdas-war-on-americas-health

The FDA's War On America's Health Why do so many innovative therapies never see the light of day midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

They’ve tried to hide the evidence, but the truth is: Mass shootings and SSRIs are heavily intertwined. There’s a clear pattern in mass shootings. Whenever a shooter’s medical history becomes public, psychiatric drugs are almost always involved—and it’s usually SSRIs. But after Big Pharma started buying up media ads in 1997, those details somehow got buried.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

You’ve seen the claims and the memes connecting mass shooters to SSRIs. You’ve probably seen the way the media responds. And maybe you’ve believed them. But the truth is clear. It’s not a conspiracy theory—it’s a coverup. SSRIs quietly reprogram normal people into ticking time bombs by triggering something called akathisia. Akathisia is a torturous state of inner restlessness and suicidal rage. Yikes.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Clearly, akathisia is no joke. It’s so unbearable that people describe it as feeling "possessed" or attacked by "dark forces." Patients under akathisia often commit acts of suicide or homicide—and some even have no memory of the events afterward. And this is apparently okay according to the FDA.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Watch this heartbreaking video of David Carmichael who killed his 11-year-old son while on SSRIs. He is now an outspoken critic of the drugs. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dwJ1TJSa7Ao

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Multiple court cases have exposed pharmaceutical giants like GSK and Pfizer. Internal documents revealed they knew their drugs caused violence and suicide. And what did they do? They hid it from the public. Juries have even found them liable for murder. But the drugs have stayed on the market anyway. If you were prescribed a medication that may make you commit suicide or homicide… would you want to be warned? I think the answer is obvious.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @MidwesternDoc's report reveals that clinical trials showed SSRIs caused psychotic violence (ie. suicides) but the industry hid the evidence until lawsuits revealed the truth. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-evidence-ssri-antidepressants

The Decades of Evidence SSRI Antidepressants Cause Mass Shootings How Dangerous Must a Drug Be Before it is Pulled from the Market? midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Here are some real examples from real lawsuits: Donald Schell, aged 60, took Paxil for only 48 hours before killing his family and himself. For the very first time, a jury found a pharma firm liable for deaths caused by antidepressant use. Kurt Danysh, who had no history of violence and was inappropriately prescribed Prozac, shot and killed his own father after 17 days of taking the drug. In 1996, Kurt was convicted of murder. But then, in 2004, it was exposed that Eli Lilly hid data that Prozac can cause violent behavior. After 24 years of hard work, Kurt was finally released from prison. Kim Witczak (@woodymatters) had a wrongful death, failure to warn lawsuit against Pfizer after her husband killed himself after taking Zoloft for 5 weeks. After filing the lawsuit, Pfizer sent investigators out to snoop into Kim’s private life. They even talked to her neighbors. In Canada, a judge ruled that Prozac led to the murder of a teen at the hands of his 16-year-old friend.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc And what did the FDA do with all of this evidence? They covered it up. They gaslit parents, buried warnings, ignored rampant trial fraud, and stonewalled Congress. It’s basically the same playbook they ran during COVID.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Mass shooting after mass shooting shows the pattern: • Columbine shooter: SSRIs • Red Lake, Minnesota shooter: An unusually high SSRI dose • Wahluke, Washington: SSRIs that cause hallucinations • Parkland shooter: psychiatric meds • Nashville shooter: psychiatric meds confirmed • And many, many more. In the 1990s, school shootings suddenly shifted from rare to frequent. The timeline overlaps with the introduction of SSRIs into the US market. And yet the media's silence grows louder with every tragedy.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc For a glimpse into what some of these shooters may have experienced, watch this video of Cory Baadsgaard who took a loaded rifle to school after developing SSRI-induced hallucinations. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlnMOee82gA

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

And it's not just shootings. Thousands of akathisia-driven murders and suicides have happened quietly across the country. And many others taking the drugs who don’t become violent have felt as though they’re slowly losing their minds. It’s a terrifying thing to experience. Victims and families were left ruined while Big Pharma raked in $17 billion a year off SSRIs alone.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @MidwesternDoc’s report exposes a shocking truth: clinical trials showed that SSRIs caused psychotic violence and suicide—but the industry hid the evidence for years, until lawsuits finally forced it into the light. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-evidence-ssri-antidepressants

The Decades of Evidence SSRI Antidepressants Cause Mass Shootings How Dangerous Must a Drug Be Before it is Pulled from the Market? midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Unfortunately, stopping SSRIs can be very challenging and even deadly. If you're on an SSRI, never stop suddenly. Withdrawal can be catastrophic—leading to severe depression, psychosis, or violent behavior. Tapering off very slowly under expert care is absolutely critical. Big Pharma and your doctor probably never told you that part. And they probably don’t mind that their patients (or should I say customers) struggle and often fail to quit.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

SSRIs are a billion-dollar weapon of mass destruction. These drugs are not only harmful but have directly caused psychotic violence, including mass shootings. The FDA helped cover it up. The media silenced the victims. And once again, the price was paid in blood. How many more need to die before we stop putting profits over people?

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Thanks for reading! This information was based on a report originally published by @MidwesternDoc. Key details were streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. Read the original report here. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-evidence-ssri-antidepressants

The Decades of Evidence SSRI Antidepressants Cause Mass Shootings How Dangerous Must a Drug Be Before it is Pulled from the Market? midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc For a deeper dive into what modern medicine has overlooked—or intentionally buried—check out these other eye-opening reports by @MidwesternDoc: The Forgotten Cancer Cure Hiding in Plain Sight https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-forgotten-cancer-cure-hiding

The Forgotten Cancer Cure Hiding in Plain Sight How DMSO turns a common dye into a highly potent cancer treatment that's harmless to normal tissue midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Why Do Vaccines Cause Autism? https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-do-vaccines-cause-autism

Why Do Vaccines Cause Autism? Past discoveries that can help us understand the current wave of neurological injuries and the silence surrounding them midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc What’s The Healthiest Water To Drink? https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/whats-the-healthiest-water-to-drink

What's The Healthiest Water To Drink? April's Open Thread midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc While you’re at it, give @MidwesternDoc a follow. No one brings more research, clinical insight, or historical context when it comes to exposing the health myths we’ve all been fed. This is easily one of the most valuable accounts you’ll ever follow. —> @MidwesternDoc https://t.co/BSCAk7IvxZ

Saved - November 20, 2025 at 12:40 AM

@HeidiHmoretti - TheHealthyRD

Just fell down a rabbit hole about glyphosate (the main ingredient in Roundup) and honestly the gut-brain connection stuff is keeping me up at night 🧵 So here's what's wild: glyphosate doesn't just kill weeds - It kills the good bacteria in your gut too. specifically lactobacillus, ruminococcaceae, and other strains that literally make neurotransmitters like GABA and serotonin in your intestines Your gut bacteria produce: -90% of your body's serotonin -GABA (your brain's "chill out" chemical) -Protective compounds that prevent Alzheimer's -Anti-inflammatory molecules that keep your brain healthy But glyphosate wipes out these beneficial microbes while letting the harmful, inflammatory ones thrive. The result? Your gut starts pumping out stress hormones and inflammatory signals that go straight to your brain here's the timeline that's bothering me: -1990s: glyphosate-resistant crops introduced -1997-2009: glyphosate use triples -2008-2018: anxiety rates in young adults nearly DOUBLE Correlation ≠ causation but... the gut-brain research is pretty compelling. when you kill off GABA-producing bacteria, anxiety goes up. when you reduce serotonin-making microbes, depression follows. The really concerning part? These effects can pass to the next generation through changes in gut bacteria that get transferred from mother to baby. Not saying glyphosate is the sole cause of rising mental health issues, but maybe we should be asking why we're okay with antimicrobial herbicides in our food supply when we're just learning how crucial our microbiome is 🤷‍♀️ Anyone else find this connection as unsettling as i do? Read more: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8959108/

Is the Use of Glyphosate in Modern Agriculture Resulting in Increased Neuropsychiatric Conditions Through Modulation of the Gut-brain-microbiome Axis? Environmental exposure to glyphosate and glyphosate-based herbicides has the potential to negatively influence neurodevelopment and behavior across generations indirectly through the gut-brain-microbiome axis. Potential mechanisms by which ... pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@TQTruthAnon - Semper911

I get the eye roll from people when they learn that I stopped eating vegetables and only eat a little organic fruit, mostly 🥩 “Organic crops are the ones they spray at night” is the not-so-hilarious joke used to absolve themselves from confronting the poisoning of our food. My gut has never been better, and it was bad bad bad. I never dreamed vegetables were my problem.

@HeidiHmoretti - TheHealthyRD

@TQTruthAnon Glad you found healing! While they may use chemicals on veggies, glyphosate isn’t the one. It’s primarily sprayed on grains, soy, corn.

Saved - September 15, 2025 at 11:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
For decades, the narrative around vaccines and their potential link to brain injuries has been manipulated, with terms like "mentally retarded" replaced by "autism" to obscure the truth. Medical researcher @MidwesternDoc highlights how PR campaigns have shaped public perception, particularly during the COVID vaccine rollout. Despite evidence suggesting vaccine-related injuries, the CDC and media have perpetuated a narrative that dismisses these concerns. As trust in health authorities declines, there’s a growing movement to reclaim medical transparency and address these long-buried truths.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

For decades, vaccines were recognized to cause brain injury and mental retardation. So “retarded” was banned, the injuries were relabeled as autism, and autism’s ambiguity was used to hide it all. Lived experiences were turned into word games. But the paper trail shows it was never an accident. In this report, @MidwesternDoc exposes the games that have been played to hide vaccine injuries for generations. 🧵 THREAD

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/erasing-encephalitis-why-vaccine

Erasing Encephalitis: Why Vaccine Brain Injuries Became Autism For decades, cunning public relations tactics have buried a flood of vaccine brain injuries. Seeing through these deceptive strategies equips you to uncover the lies shaping every corner of our lives. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Propaganda works. In fact, it’s one of the most powerful invisible forces in modern society. Professional PR firms create narratives that most people believe, even when they very obviously go against our self-interest. And most people never notice it’s happening. The COVID vaccine roll out was the largest PR campaign of our lifetime.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Many of our modern cultural beliefs didn’t emerge naturally—they were planted. When a belief requires a massive PR campaign to sustain it, odds are it wouldn’t exist without that campaign. Case in point: “Vaccines don’t cause autism.” All of the anecdotal evidence points to at least a correlation between vaccines and autism. But the propaganda has convinced a massive amount of people to ignore what they’ve seen with their own eyes.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

RFK Jr., backed by Trump, came into his position as HHS secretary with a simple mission: enforce existing vaccine safety laws, open the data, and require real trials before approval. These things shouldn’t be controversial. But instead of support, he was met with media smears and sabotage.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

When the CDC director refused to remove officials who blocked transparency, she was fired. And then those officials resigned anyway. One of them, Dr. Demetre Daskalakis, tried to frame RFK Jr. as waging a “war on science” on his way out. When the spotlight shifted to Daskalakis, his private life exploded into public view. Photos surfaced of Daskalakis in fetish outfits with other men—some with satanic symbols. The backlash was fierce. But all the while he appeared to be living in a bubble, never expecting the backlash that followed his statements and the revelation of his private life. As the public tried to process how the CDC ignored mountains of vaccine injury reports, many saw this as a window into why the agency was so hostile to truth.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

And then on X, Rand Paul zeroed in on the problem: the CDC’s zeal around vaccines mirrors a fetish-like obsession that is not supported by data. Meanwhile, the Hepatitis B shot for newborns—one of the most controversial vaccines ever—was defended with a narrative that never made sense. But PR turned it into moral dogma.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Then Daskalakis went on a media tour. On CNN, he doubled down on using the term “pregnant people.” But on MSNBC, he was suddenly polished, dropping the gender talk, and rolling out sculpted phrases that were critical of RFK Jr. and reeked of PR coaching. Two totally different personas for two different audiences. Classic propaganda.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Dimitri Dascalakis resigned as director of the National Center on Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, greeted by clapping from hundreds of colleagues and public health workers. He described leaving an environment where the CDC is treated as a tool to generate policies that do not reflect scientific reality and are designed to hurt rather than to improve public health. He recalled learning about Secretary Kennedy’s directive to change the childhood and adult immunization schedules for COVID-19 via Twitter, noting that CDC data supporting the decision were not provided. He said, seven months into the new administration, no CDC subject matter expert from his center had briefed the secretary, calling that situation extremely abnormal. He warned of eugenics rhetoric in the movement and referenced statements about beef tallow and avian flu, insisting this showed dangerous beliefs. He and colleagues raised red flags about dangerous developments in the country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Joining me now is doctor Dimitri Dascalakis. He just resigned as the director of the National Center on Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. He was clapped out today, I should add, by current and former employees today. You can see him walking out there with flowers. There were hundreds of employees who clapped out the team who resigned. It's great to see you. I know the last twenty four hours have probably been an incredible whirlwind for you, and I think so many people out there watching are just trying to figure out what is going on. But let and I have a lot to ask you about, but I wanna just start by asking you about what what it felt like today to to walk out there and have so many of your colleagues, so many people clapping for you. What was that moment like? Speaker 1: So I didn't expect it. I know that we were going to walk out and have some folks clapping, and I expected to see 20 and 20 or 30 people. And instead, there were hundreds and hundreds of people, and also there were folks in the public health service and the commission corps who were saluting us from a distance. And so, I was really overwhelmed. I mean, I think, I was crying walking down that path, both with joy as well as with sadness, because they're the people that make CDC great. And sort of living where we live now and sort of seeing how public health professionals have been dehumanized, people really need to see that human moment, that the people that they're seeing in those images that you're playing right now are the people who do everything with such enthusiasm and so much love. It's the people that make sure that The US stays healthy and that it stays safe. And so as people, you know, try to dehumanize public health workers through mis and disinformation, Those images are burned in my mind as something that really reminds me just how much CDC should be and could be about love. Speaker 0: It's such an important point. I had the honor of working for two presidents, and the overwhelming majority of people who work in government are apolitical. They're experts. They're nerds in the best way possible, and that's who runs government. You you wrote this I just read a couple a number of parts of it, but you wrote this incredibly powerful letter. I read it a couple of times, and I just wanted to ask you about some of the things you said because it was all in your words. You wrote, I am unable to serve in an environment that treats CDC as a tool to generate policies and materials that do not reflect scientific reality and are designed to hurt rather than to improve the public's health. That is a very direct statement, and I think for those watching who are worried, they're worried what are they gonna gain access to, what does it mean, what should they listen to. Tell us more about what does that mean, and and how should people understand it who aren't experts and haven't worked in the CDC? Speaker 1: No, thanks so much for that question, Jen. And I think I'm gonna start by saying I'm a doctor. So I see patients, I'm a clinician. And when I was in medical school and I finished, we raised our hands and made that Hippocratic Oath that said first to do no harm. And I'm seeing CDC being transformed into a weapon where people are not allowed to share scientific data and that that scientific data is potentially going to be contaminated more and more with ideology. And so as a clinician, as a doctor, I see that that is harm. And I see that if science isn't able to shine through the ideology, then what we are going to see is a lot of trouble, both in sort of what my health is, what my kids' health is like, but frankly, also national security. So I could no longer be party to seeing the transformation of my brilliant scientists into something that could potentially hurt children. Speaker 0: What was there one moment that led you to decide you that pushed you over the edge to resolve? Speaker 1: I mean, you know, it's it's really been a death by a thousand cuts. So I think in my letter, I I have a a list of some of the things that I experienced. I I think that, you know, some of the things that stand out, I think some people may recall that recently Secretary Kennedy put out a directive that changed the childhood immunization schedule and also the adult immunization schedule for COVID-nineteen, making it more restrictive for children. That means limiting access by the way, to making it more restrictive for children and also for pregnant women. And I'm never gonna forget how I learned about it, which was on Twitter. So I was sitting in a senior leader meeting. I am one of the COVID experts, one of the vaccine experts, and at a senior leader meeting at CDC, my phone blew up and it was people saying, We didn't know that you changed the vaccine schedule. And then they said, There's this video online that you can see. And that's how we learned about it. And then we had to ask for, Can we get some paper? Can we get something in writing so we can figure out how to implement this directive since all we had was the video? We eventually got the paper and, you know, my job as a scientist is to say, can we also see the data that led to that decision? And that data was never provided to CDC. Speaker 0: No. Because because it probably wasn't based on data, I I don't think. I mean, you were the medical expert, but that's the core issue here at play, it feels like. One of the things you also said, which which I I wasn't aware of, is that you said in your letter we are now seven months into the new administration, and no CDC subject matter expert from my center has ever briefed the secretary. And I've never worked in the CDC, but I spent a lot of time in government, and I can tell you that it's completely abnormal. It is the experts who should be providing the information updates, and most presidents want that information. Most secretaries want that information. But how abnormal is that? Like, how often would the secretary be briefed by experts in the CDC? Speaker 1: It's extremely abnormal. And so I think, having been in federal government for, five years and local government, for, a long time as well, experts are are really, sort of the the the the key, individuals that brief principals, so brief the secretary and secretary like individuals so that they're able to really guide their thinking around policy. So it is true that my center covers measles, COVID, flu, polio. I have a long list of things that the secretary really should be briefed about. And I'll also add that I had the opportunity to to interact with some of his staff from the office of the secretary in in big senior leader meetings, where I explicitly said, we have never briefed the secretary on anything. Yeah. We really appreciate the opportunity. Measles, obviously is something that, he has said a lot about. I have no idea where he's getting that information, but it's not from CDC experts. Speaker 0: Probably not from medical experts, I suspect, if it's not aligned with your thinking. You you also said I know I keep bringing up your letter because it was so powerful. Everybody should read it. We'll post it. It's you say eugenics play plays prominently in the rhetoric being generated. I think anybody who's been paying attention would agree with you. But from from your perspective, tell us more about what you mean by that. Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, I think that the whole, rhetoric behind the movement that secretary secretary Kennedy thinks that he's launched is really that only the strong survive. So whether it's cutting social programs that are so that are important to children, whether it's cutting access to food. So, you know, making America healthy means good food. So, you know, cutting things like food benefits for children seems like it's not a really good idea to be able to achieve that end. So I think that, and he clearly has a belief, if he actually does believe in viruses and bacteria, which I don't know if he actually does, and the fact that they exist. But he has this belief that sometimes infection is better than vaccine because it creates, I think, the people who survive are the people who should continue to propagate the species. I'm never going to forget, there was an interview that he did at a restaurant talking about the importance of using beef tallow in in french fries, and in that interview, he was talking about his desire to have an avian flu burn through chickens, and the chickens that survive, they're the ones that should be bred. That is that's those are the words that he said. They're available to watch. And he said because those chickens have the superior genetics. And then one minute later, he said that the president also has superior genetics. So, I mean, from my perspective, as someone, who, you know, has sort of the cultural background of, of, you know, a grandfather who was killed fighting, fascism in Greece, that's sort of, like, embedded in my brain, and I heard that. And I'm like, so that's what this is all about. So, you know, if there are, kids who, who, get infected and do well, that's great. We shouldn't be giving them vaccines, I guess, so that, we can really propagate the strongest of the species. I feel like what he said about chickens is what he believes about people, and that's scary, and America should know that. So it is a major this is like there is a fundamental thing happening here that I think we all resigned, the three of us, doctor Hari, myself, and doctor Jernigan, to raise the red flag that something is extremely wrong and dangerous in this country. Speaker 0: It is so powerful what you're doing. I think people are so scared out there. Public health is such an important part of our society and our community. And I I have no doubt I have a great grandfather who's he's passed away, but who also was a doctor. I feel very connected to you. I have no doubt he would be very, very proud of you. Thank you for being so vocal and for being here with us tonight. I really appreciate it.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Read the full deep-dive from @MidwesternDoc—it will change how you see vaccine narratives forever. midwesterndoctor.com/p/erasing-ence…

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc RFK Jr. hit back on Fox News. He revealed that Daskalakis directly blocked federal aid to Texas during a measles outbreak after RFK Jr. requested it. Let that sink in. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eA93V5Kc8BU

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Daskalakis also stonewalled vaccine safety data for seven months and ran the system that was capturing <1% of COVID vaccine injuries. It was malpractice. So the exact same officials who claimed RFK Jr. would unleash a measles catastrophe actively sabotaged the measles response in Texas. Their goal has never been about public health. They’ve been protecting the vaccine program—and weaponizing outbreaks for political gain. In lockstep, the media played their role.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc This duplicity runs deep. Orwell warned that language defines thought. Change the words, and you change what people can even conceive of. With vaccines, this was weaponized through slippery phrases like “safe and effective”—never defined, yet endlessly repeated.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Before censorship took over, vaccine encephalitis and brain injury were openly documented in journals and even discussed in the media. In the 1980s, doctors openly admitted vaccines could leave children “mentally retarded.” But that language was later banned—and replaced. The word was attacked in the 2000s and in 2010 Obama signed a law outlawing the term “mentally retarded.” “Mentally retarded” became “autism.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
This Donahue episode centers on immunizations, especially DPT (Diphtheria, Pertussis, Tetanus) and the pertussis controversy. Parents describe severe reactions linked to vaccination, including Scott Grant’s brain injury after the DPT shot and Abra’s seizures after her second DPT, with testimony that experts could not prove absolute causality. Wisconsin passed legislation identifying vaccine lot numbers and manufacturers after litigation. Speakers debate whether the pertussis component can be made safer—one doctor says there has been no improvement in pertussis vaccine for forty years—while others praise vaccines for eradicating polio, measles, and rubella. Critics argue doctors withhold risk information; advocates call for better information, reporting of adverse reactions, and a federal mandate for lot-number recording. The program also touches on Reye’s syndrome and aspirin use, swine flu vaccine and Guillain–Barré, opt-out states (about 21), and international experiences (Sweden/West Germany).
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did you give your baby the DPT shot? Speaker 1: Yes, I did. Speaker 0: Is, what is your understanding? Were you obliged to give the baby the DPT shot or was it a voluntary decision? Speaker 1: Oh, a little bit of both, but I think I would have given it to him. I like to protect him against every disease that I can. Speaker 0: Right. At what age was, was he six months when you got the, when was the first shot? Speaker 1: Oh, can't remember. Speaker 2: I can't either, Speaker 0: I know. Speaker 1: He's had so many. I really can't remember. Speaker 0: Yeah. You're aware that there's some, you know, it's not, it's not terrifying enough now to be a parent. They're telling us. You know what I mean? Speaker 1: We're worried about other things. Speaker 0: Yeah. And they're suggesting that maybe DPT has Speaker 3: I really didn't know that Speaker 1: until we were discussing it right before the show. I didn't know there were so many dangerous side effects. Speaker 0: Okay. Now we're not going to pretend on this program to solve all of the problems. It is possible that we will make you more anxious than you would have liked to be. It's possible that you you'll wish by the time this program is over that you had arrived here on the day we had the male strippers. I mean, that's a lot easier show to handle. So let us make it clear that while we are not claiming to be writing here and there are no Solomons at hand, we do have a professional group of people here who will probably differ on some of the issues about which we will speak. And we ask you to stay with us as a mother of a 22 old person. You may have some more questions. Is she typical, Doctor. Mendelson? Robert S. Mendelson, pediatrician? Michael Reese, Chicago, big shot doctor who's going to come in again and make the entire medical community hysterical because it is suggested you are an overkiller. You come in and say everything about medicine is bad. You have grandchildren? Speaker 2: Three grandchildren. Speaker 0: Have they been immunized? Speaker 2: They have not been immunized. Nothing? One child had one tetanus shot, but I have to tell you, Phil, that the latest evidence is that the tetanus shot is probably just water. Because in reducing the reactivity of the shot, they have also reduced Speaker 0: Hi, man. Speaker 2: In reducing the reaction to the shot, the manufacturers have also reduced the capacity of the shot to produce immunity. Speaker 0: They diluted it, you mean. Speaker 2: But the most important thing that was said here today was this lady who said that she didn't know until she came here the dangers of the shots. Because for forty years now doctors have not been telling patients the truth. Important function that your program provides is that we give patients, you give patients, the kind of questions they can put to their doctors. I regard the Donahue show as the best form of medical education Tell Speaker 0: that to the American Academy of of Pediatrics. Okay. Speaker 4: Okay, I'm a mother of a three year old that's just starting school and before I took her to school they missed a DPT shot somewhere along the line. She was too sick to get it. Bottom line is they wouldn't let her in school without the DPT shot, which they gave to her to, you know, like recently. You know, they backlogged it. It wasn't put down. And the schools do not let children in. Ronnie And they run temperatures from them. I think that anything that they run a temperature from can't be good. Speaker 0: May I see the DPT graphic, Ronnie? We don't want to insult your intelligence. If you're a caring, mother, father, anybody, you know what this is. But let's make sure we know what we're talking about. DPT stands for Diphtheria, Pertussis, and Tetanus. Pertussis is a whooping cough. And it is the P. Now, now Doctor. Mendelson wants you to know he doesn't think he ought to take this at all, any of it. None of this alphabet soup he thinks you ought to take. Now, he is not necessarily getting a standing ovation from the American Academy of Pediatrics for that. But let's go Speaker 2: back Well, that isn't true for Alright, Speaker 0: some agree, I'm sure. Speaker 2: But I you cannot claim to have to tell you that next year I've been invited to be the keynote speaker for the American Medical Students Association and this is exactly what I'm going say to them. Speaker 0: Alright, I'm not saying you're a bad guy. I'm trying to establish that you are at the very least a controversial animal. And I don't think you should necessarily apologize for that. It means that you're raising issues about which there's a considerable disagreement. Speaker 2: I'm taking this stuff out of the medical journals and trying to Speaker 5: lay it before the public. Speaker 0: Let me see that graphic one more time, Ryan. It is the P, pertussis, about which there appears to be the most controversy. And, we'll get into that in a moment. Meet Louis Z. Cooper, MD. Another big shot from the medical community, Director of Pediatrics, St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital, New York City, Chairman of the New York Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, has been involved in vaccine research for the last twenty years. And what's your opening shot? No pun, Doctor. How do you respond to what's Speaker 5: Phil, I am grateful that my colleague here gives us a chance to tell this audience how exciting it is to be part of a community where we don't fear polio, where we don't fear measles, where we don't fear rubella, where we don't fear pertussis. The way we did when I was a boy and the way we did when I started medical school. I lived through watching patients die and watching patients be critically and crucially injured for many years with the illnesses that now most of this audience don't know anything about except what they read in textbooks. And that's a very happy circumstance due to vaccines. Speaker 6: But there are a number Speaker 0: here we go. J. Anthony Morris, PhD. Doctor. Morris has been with us before. Here is the man who said to President Ford and others during the nineteen seventy six Yes. Swine flu epidemic. Remember when the president got his shot in the Oval Office and everybody ran out? Guillain Barre was just one of the suggested unfortunate reactions that literally hundreds, thousands of people suffered following that immunization program, about which Doctor. Morris, who was then with the VA, is that right? Food and Drug Administration. You were with the FDA, disagreed. You should also know that he lost his job, and he is a vaccine researcher. What is Speaker 7: If your make the assumption that what Doctor. Cooper said is so, that does not do away with the point raised by that lady. Now in a recent editorial, in the most recent issue of the State Medical Journal of my state, Maryland, there's an editorial there that says, cannot accept the pertussis vaccine as it now is. That is that if there's legislative and public pressure to improve this vaccine, that improvement will take place. So we're not saying that what Doctor. Cooper says is not so. What we're saying, it could be better. And the dangers that are associated with the use of pertussis vaccine could be done away with. Speaker 0: What are the dangers? Speaker 7: The dangers are that you might suffer serious neurologic damage. Speaker 6: A relative Speaker 0: Causes seizure in some Speaker 7: causes seizure. It causes the inability to use muscles as you have in the audience today, Scotty. Speaker 0: As you know, there was a good deal of publicity in Great Britain about immunization and Fleet Street got on this in the early 70s and boy the hysteria and the friends. Suddenly, Britain went from percentage of eighty percent of the population. Ronnie, this is on visual seven ten, if we can just see the graphic on this. In '19 from '74 from '47 to '74, about eighty percent of the population of Great Britain was immunized. Then the media got on this thing, and much as the Donahue show is doing now, trying very hard to be responsible, unlike apparently what happened in Britain. And so a significant number of people in The UK backed away from immunization. And guess what? A pertussis epidemic in nineteen seventy seven-seventy eight, significant numbers of whooping cough cases. And in 1980, then, then they got back on it. In 1982, there were fifty thousand pertussis cases in The United Kingdom with twelve deaths. Okay. Let me tell Speaker 7: you what happened in my state. Following a broadcast by the NBC concerning pertussis vaccine, there was several months thereafter a public release from the state health department in Maryland saying that there's an outbreak of pertussis in our state. And we believe that this outbreak might have resulted from the reluctance of parents to have their child, children, immunized against pertussis. I got from the State Department of Health the data that they had got off of the computer which served as the basis of the news released. There was no outbreak of pertussis in the state of Maryland. Why? In the county? And the cases that did occur, occurred in vaccinated children, for the most part, who had received the vaccine according to the recommended procedure. So they said there were forty one cases of pertussis. They could not have been more than five cases of pertussis. And each of these five cases occurred in children who had been vaccinated. Speaker 0: You're suggesting that maybe DPT caused them to get whoop whooping? Speaker 5: No. I'm not saying that. Speaker 7: What I'm saying is that when true when parents are aware of the dangers associated with a pertussis vaccine, this awareness does not result in an outbreak of pertussis because they are aware of the dangers of the vaccine. And that's the impression the state of Maryland gave. Speaker 0: Okay, meet Marge Grant. Mrs. Grant is the mother of Scott Grant who is at hand. Scott is 21 years old, a, these are all polysyllabic words and, I am sure Mrs. Grant that it's okay if I proceed to give these folks just a very, very brief Speaker 2: Sure. Speaker 0: Evaluation of, Scott's condition. He's a spastic quadriplegic, and you are saying that in fact twenty one years ago today, we should say that, Scott is a, Scott is, although certainly, somewhat limited in his own motor ability and mental capacity is still a real good boy and obviously a very good looking young man who the audience should know has the motor activity development of about a nine month old. Speaker 8: Exactly. Speaker 0: And the mental capacity of about? Speaker 8: Seven years of age in understanding only. Speaker 0: And it was 21 it was twenty years ago today? Speaker 8: Phil, it was exactly. It's exactly twenty one years ago this morning at 05:30 that he reacted severely after his third shot which was given twelve hours earlier. The reaction was Speaker 0: The shot, the DPT? Speaker 8: The DPT, right. It was the third shot he received on the December 7. And the following morning around 05:30 he woke up earlier than usual and I was fixing his breakfast and all of a sudden he was in his infancy and he clenched his fist and his head went back and he fairly yelled like as if to say I'm falling, catch me. And to this very day he's very sensitive to falling. Speaker 0: Alright. Now you attempted to litigate Scott's case and were not successful. Apparently, your witnesses were not able to convince the judge or the jury of the absolute causality between the DPT and Scott's seizure. Speaker 8: Really that wasn't the issue at the time of trial. I could not prove that Scott had received Park Davis's product because even though the doctor at the time he administered it told me it was Quadrigine which was BPT plus polio combined, and it was put out by Park Davis. He did not record it on Scott's record. Speaker 0: Oh, I see. So the question, the gray area in the court then, that was not what caused his medical condition, but what brand product was. Speaker 8: Right. So I lost my suit against Park Davis. However, we had five experts that did indeed treat Scott and see Scott, and they said it was indeed the duty You that hurt Speaker 0: are also proud of the fact that your litigation provoked legislation in the state of Wisconsin, which obliges all immunizations now to be identified by lot number Speaker 8: and Speaker 0: manufacturer. Speaker 8: That's only as of the last year, and that also includes the fact that now we do have a personal conviction waiver that we do not have to take in the state of Wisconsin, but it was a group of us that petitioned the legislation. Speaker 0: Right. Do you understand Doctor. Cooper's point here that, much as we can empathize with the pain and the, significant interruption in your own life, family life, in every way that this has caused you, he wants you to know that there are thousands and thousands of people out there who've been spared similar difficulty because of immunology. And that this is, that the numbers indicate that while this, while there are questions, certainly when you Speaker 8: clearly that the government is at fault. The government has not forced the manufacturer to remove the component that's causing this neuroma Speaker 0: Which one is that? Speaker 8: The pertussis, the whooping cough component. Speaker 0: You're convinced that it was the pee and DPT that caused this problem for your ears. Speaker 8: I have no question, nor did the experts. Speaker 0: Doctor. Cooper, it does, we do have significant medical testimony indicating that the pertussis feature of DPT is a rather unstable mixture of chemistry about which we really know very little. And Doctor. Morris wants you to know that he thinks that the, that the pertussis problem really almost disappears after two months of age. And you don't give it until the kid is two months. Speaker 5: Yeah. Well, I, I, I don't know what Tony would say, but pertussis is a problem not just for the two month old, but for children of all ages. It's a bigger problem for the children under a year of age. And one of the reasons we start the vaccine at age two months is to try to provide some degree of protection as soon as possible. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 5: I agree with missus Grant that it probably was the pertussis vaccine that caused Scott's awful problem. Speaker 0: Well, why why do we have the pee then? And why don't we just sell the pee? Speaker 5: Because because until we can produce a vaccine which is safer than the one we have Speaker 0: You think we have Speaker 6: to every pay this? Year we'll Speaker 5: be saving hundreds and thousands of lives by using what we've got. We need a better pertussis vaccine, and there has to be more research to help us find a better vaccine. That vaccine has been improved very little in thirty years. Speaker 0: Doctor. Mattison. Speaker 2: Well, do you think that doctors should tell patients that I'm going to give you the whoopie cough vaccine and if I give it to you, you might turn out to be like Scott with encephalopathy and mental retardation and cerebral palsy and convulsions and a shock like state. Do you think that doctors should be telling that to patients or should doctors be hiding that from patients as they've done for forty years? Bob, I don't think doctors should hide anything from Why haven't they been telling that to patients? Why is it that this audience here Speaker 0: The first woman who stood up said she was not aware of any problem. Speaker 2: And now now that that information is available, but people can't go to medical journals. Although if they want, they can read Tony Morris's publications. Yep. They can read my Speaker 6: publications. Part of that, Speaker 0: doctor Mendelson is I mean, how would you like to be the mother in the pediatrician's office after he says, now we have the DPT, I recommend it because we really diminished. But you should also know, and then he takes out a poster of a child in a wheelchair who's got a mental capacity of seven years at age I 20 mean, what kind of a black male is that? Speaker 2: Well then if I'm the mother or the father, then I have to ask the pediatrician some questions. I have to say to him, what is the incidence of these reactions? And the pediatrician will then say, it's one in a million. And then you say to the pediatrician, oh, but Doctor Mendelson has shown me evidence from the medical journals that turns out to prove that the incidence of convulsions is one in a hundred. The incidence of severe mental permanent defect is one in a thousand. And that information is in the medical journals. The only problem is the American doctors don't report it because they're so afraid of malpractice suits. But if you go to the foreign literature, which is now appearing in all the law cases, because now just like just like your case, there are now hundreds of law cases reaching your way through the court. Speaker 9: Pop, come on. Speaker 0: Alright. Hang on just a second. Let's get this in. Sweden no longer obliges parents to administer DPT shots. Right? Sweden is off. West Germany is off. What what about the Speaker 2: And 21 states in this country. Speaker 0: Other words, you the option. Speaker 9: Is that what you're saying? Speaker 2: Give you the option. Speaker 0: And here's a woman who ran into the entire bureaucracy of the whole school system because her kid didn't have his card. You know? Speaker 6: I mean, Speaker 0: the kid is four years old and gotta have a card. Speaker 5: Bill, a democratic society is a complex venture. Yeah. And we and I don't know a simple solution. No. But you Speaker 0: doctor give individual freedom. Speaker 5: Wait a minute. Speaker 0: Wait a minute. Speaker 5: To give individual freedom. Speaker 6: I wanna Speaker 0: get you in here. Just one Speaker 5: also protect folks. In fact, of course, Speaker 0: give me your pertussis, Doctor Cooper Doctor Cooper said something Speaker 7: that's very important. There's been no improvement in pertussis vaccine for forty years. There has been no effort on the part of the government enforce this improvement until recently, following that pertussis program that was broadcast by an apparently the within recent months. Following that, I just said before I came here, a notice in my mail that the government is now setting up an organization to improve the pertussis vaccine. That was forced upon them by that broadcast as your broadcast will force them to do something too. And the Bob Mendelsohn says that the doctor does not inform the dangers associated with the use of this vaccine. That will force the symptoms. Speaker 0: And you can also get DT, can't you? Yes. You can, in other words, is that an option? I assume that depends on the legislation in the states at which the request is made. Speaker 2: That's an option. Well, it's an option where the government itself admits that the DTD vaccine probably isn't any good. Speaker 0: Alright, I'm running a little long here. Promise we'll give you a chance. Honest doctor, we're real good to doctors on this program. I have Wilma Gundy here. Mrs. Gundy developed receiving the swine flu vaccine six years ago. She's the person who responded to the Ford administration's call, the swine flu is coming, the swine flu is coming, we have to get vaccinated, and she did. She is one of literally thousands of people who contracted this disease, a syndrome, I should call it. And incidentally, more than a 100 lawyers in the justice department have worked overtime just handling the litigation that was provoked by this. Speaker 10: And we intend to keep them working. Speaker 0: You, yes, you had the shot on November 1976. And when did you first feel numbness? Speaker 10: I started feeling numbness three weeks and one day later. 20 on the twenty second day. All at once, my feet and and legs and hands and arms began Okay, to turn Speaker 0: now we're not trying to scare you to death, we have to get this in Doctor. Cooper. Certainly Mrs. Gundy steps forward as dramatic evidence to the fact that the medical community, even abetted by the President of The United States and an august panel of immunologists and clinicians and researchers, does not necessarily in every case make decision. It certainly appears, first of all, didn't even have any swine flu. We didn't need the vaccine in the first place. The numbers and the research that went into suggesting that it was coming were flawed. And now steps forward this taxpaying American to say, why should I believe anything? Speaker 10: Yes, I was not given any information about the amount of benefits versus the risks. When I finally did some research on my own, I found out I had actually twenty eight chances in one thousand of having any benefits at all from the vaccine. And they did not tell me about the risks that were involved. They did not tell me that I might develop a neurological disorder at all. They particularly, and this is where I think that Speaker 3: they were most Speaker 10: faulted, routinely the drug companies sent a flyer to the doctors with the vaccine that people who were allergic to feathers should not take this vaccination. I was never given that information. Speaker 0: Alright. Speaker 2: Well, people who take the measles vaccine aren't given the information that the measles vaccine can lead to mental retardation. That the German measles vaccine can lead to arthritis. Speaker 0: Yes. But in some people yeah. Alright. Well, let's see how much sense we can make here with an audience that has more than just a single question for all of you. I'll give you that chance. Immunology, vaccinations, you know our kids today, DPT, measles, polio, rubella. And if you're not confused confused enough, enough, here come the folks saying maybe aspirin shouldn't be given to children when they have a fever because of Reye's syndrome. I'll tell you, being a parent today is an outright act of courage. And we hope you'll join us. Speaker 11: I went yesterday to the library when I found out what the topic would be today to find out what I could on immunizations and the dangers. I could find nothing in reader's guide periodicals, which would be the magazine articles on the dangers. The only time I've ever heard anything was through the media, and it was the DPT scare, which petrified me. I thought I had killed my child with immunization. And we don't know what to turn. You're damned if you do and damned if you don't. You don't know what's the answer? Yes or no? Speaker 2: I will be happy to send you and anyone else who wants it a free copy of my newsletter that deals with risks of immunizations that gets articles from inside the medical journals which I agree with you are not generally available to the public. I am recommending now that if there's any person in this audience who decides to give their kid a DPT shot, the least they can do is to write down when the kid gets the shot, the name of the manufacturer, the expiration date, and the batch number so that in case something happens later on, they won't get into the situation that you got into. At least they'll know who the hell to sue. Speaker 0: Doctor Cooper, please. Speaker 6: Well, let Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 0: Well, doctor, how just how are you gonna find that out? The doctor The doctor's got the box there when he right. And and I have never seen the doctor show me the box or the bottle or Speaker 8: How Speaker 5: do you find that? Speaker 0: It's just one of the states that obliges the recording of the particular lot number and the manufacturer. So we're getting smart. We're slow, Speaker 2: but Listen, what do we do in if Speaker 8: go the doctor and you say, I insist that you record this. And believe me, it is important. Speaker 5: Yeah. Well, let's get back a couple of issues. Speaker 0: First of Speaker 5: all, almost half the vaccine given in this country is given in public programs. It's now the law that anyone who gets a vaccine in a public program has to be given this pamphlet called important information about vaccines. Speaker 0: Yeah, but you gotta have a magnifying glass to read it. Speaker 5: Yeah, doc, well you can't read it. But you can't read it. Speaker 0: No, no, his point is that you can read it. Speaker 5: Everyone is handed and must receive important information about the vaccines, which includes the risks and the benefits. Speaker 6: I would suggest that you Speaker 5: ask your pediatrician for This is Speaker 8: the crux. The private physician does not have to give you this. And this is why I'm saying it should be a mandate from the federal level that everybody must record information. It'd Speaker 10: be no good at all. Speaker 12: Right before I started kindergarten, when I was five, I was given the shots that you're supposed to be given, including the measles. And a little while after I got the measles shot, I developed this thing, my hands would just freeze up in terrible pain, and I would wake up crying. And I remember my mother and I soaking them in water and things. And after this happened, that's when he told me that this could be a side effect. We never knew before. Speaker 0: Yeah, but obviously you sustained no brain damage. But Doctor Mendelson wants you to know that you came awfully close to the possibility. You Speaker 2: sure did. And I have to tell you, you've learned a good lesson, which I can't tell you how happy I am is being transmitted today to the entire American population because the doctors haven't told people the truth about DES or ultrasound or X-ray. Speaker 0: Alright. Now Please don't let's Speaker 2: they're getting the truth as a result today Speaker 0: Okay. Speaker 2: About immunizations. Speaker 0: Yeah. Let me just get one more guest in here. Meet Emily Jankovich. Mrs. Jankovich is the mother of Abra who is how old? Speaker 3: She's three half Abra. Speaker 0: Abra cannot be with us today because apparently she sustains episodic seizure. Speaker 3: Yes. Abra was normal up till the age of four months and she had her second DPT. And as her parents Speaker 0: We have a photograph here around her, may they? Oh yes. Speaker 3: That was, that photograph is when Abra was normal yet, when she was about three months old. And she had had one DPT already and apparently she was alright. We assumed that she was alright. It wasn't until her second DPT that we noticed that there was obviously a problem. The very day she had her DPT shot, she had a seizure. We didn't know it was a seizure, but we knew something was wrong because she was turning blue and shaking and she was obviously in distress. And so it was my only child, our first child, so but I still knew something was wrong so we rushed to the emergency room and by the time we got there she was alright. We told the doctor that she had had her DPT. Was there any connection? He said, It looks like just a choking incident. From that point on, for the next nine months, we told every doctor we saw, neurologists included, that she had had her DPT. We felt there was a connection. Well, for two weeks after that initial reaction from our daughter, we didn't see anything. We didn't see anything. There may have been something. But two weeks later, she had grand mal seizures and she was in critical state for forty eight hours. And to this day, Abra, like Sunday, she had 50 seizures. And she has as many as hundreds of seizures a day. And she is very heavily drugged. She can't walk, she can't talk, she can't even chew, but she is very responsive. That picture Speaker 0: And you would not guess that looking at Speaker 3: She's very responsive to people and she has full motor use, but her brain isn't making the connection that she can use them. So she doesn't walk and she doesn't talk. And she's, thoroughly disabled. Speaker 0: Have you sued anybody? Speaker 3: We have a case. Speaker 6: Pending? Speaker 0: Yes. Okay, now let's get, Speaker 3: Something I'd like Speaker 9: to speak to. Speaker 0: Yeah, imagine how thrilled all the pharmaceutical companies with this. Now here's the problem. Let's just try, let's, let's, let's try and be responsible here. There's no doubt, nobody's here to say that you're not, that the roulette wheel doesn't spin when you take a vac, when you accept vaccine. The question is what provo what provides the greatest there's all kinds of questions. What provides the greatest common good? How much is the medical community sharing information with each other about possible problems? How much does the inevitable interest of the pharmaceutical industry weigh in the decision on the part of the physician to administer these? Why does it have to be a law? Should we have the freedom to decide whether or not? And for the sake of Doctor. Cooper and those who think that we've come a long way to eradicate problems of diseases, here are three mothers who wish they had had the immunization available to them at the time of the The first mother is the mother of a child with measles. Obviously the fever must have gone up and brain damage. The other two mothers you will see on this table were exposed to rubella during pregnancy. This is sad, but this is the other side of this coin. Roll the table. Speaker 8: She has brain damage from the measles. And we don't think that she'll ever improve. Speaker 10: The rubella vaccine came four years too late for us. Speaker 6: For a woman to have Speaker 4: a child like this day is senseless tragedy for herself, for her family, for everyone involved in contact with her. Speaker 0: Alright, the last two children then were victimized by the mother's exposure to rubella during pregnancy. The first child had measles. So now what? Speaker 3: There are so many things here. When my husband and I talk about this, we realize that vaccinations will always be given. We, we feel that's a fact. But we were uninformed as parents. We went into the doctor's office like every other mother. I have dozens of friends who have babies and they all went in and got their shots, but not one of them knew there could be devastating results either from the disease or from not, or from the vaccine. So I went in ignorant. I knew nothing about the possible side effects. And we didn't have the option of making the decision as parents, pro and con. We would like to have had the facts and made the decision as the parents of our daughter and lived with the consequences then. If we had decided on the vaccine, we would live with the consequences. Speaker 0: There must be real anger about that ignorance. That's what really enrages you. Speaker 3: Yes, because we know there's cases like we just shown that they have side effects from the disease itself. But we feel too that there are many, many more children who are affected adversely than anyone ever knows. We have been in dozens of hospitals and we have seen children on these children's floors with seizures, learning disabilities, and no one knows why. But even a nurse told us this. She told us that her child had seizures after the DPT but she didn't even know that there could be such a reaction until we told her. So it's, this is how Speaker 0: we There are also reports, which these are reports, that there are pediatricians who are giving DPTs and not giving them to their children. Or administering DPTs and taking the pee out of the DPT for their own children. We'll be back in just a moment. Speaker 4: Was tragic for herself, for her family, for everyone involved in contact with her. Speaker 0: We're back. Yes ma'am, you'll stand. Speaker 13: Yes, I know I can have empathy for the lady with her son, but my son had polio and he got polio in November, January the Salk vaccine came out. And I'm sorry it was too late for him, but it's devastating. And I know that some people say, well they got a mild case of polio with the vaccine, but it was nothing like the paralysis. Speaker 0: That's your son. Speaker 13: And that my son was lucky he had many operations and he's all right now. But even like penicillin can help some people and someone else can have a reaction. Speaker 10: Excuse me. There's no way that we would say all vaccines should be done away with. It's just that I think the public needs to be informed. We need to be told the benefits versus the risk. We need to know what we're facing. Speaker 2: Well, the darker side of the polio vaccine and what nobody knows is that Jonas Salk has pointed out that in the last ten years in this country, two thirds of all the cases of polio have been vaccine induced. How many Speaker 6: cases is that, Bob? Speaker 5: Only How many cases, Bob? Speaker 2: Would you not interrupt me for a second? I know that doctors are used to interrupting patients, but not another doctor. Speaker 6: I interrupted you. Absolutely. Especially another doctor. Speaker 5: Chief doctor. Speaker 0: I think, but let's get, he does make a point that we should also say Sabin is live and the live vaccine and Salk is Speaker 5: Is inactive. Speaker 0: Is inactive as we say in the laboratory. Alright. How many was it? They ask. Speaker 2: Well, how many people know that the European epidemic of polio, there were about twenty or thirty cases in this country. Now, of course, the American doctors will argue that the reason why polio disappeared in this country was because of the vaccine. But then why did it disappear in Europe in the nineteen forties and the nineteen fifties without mass vaccination? Why doesn't it occur in the third world where only ten percent of the people have ever been immunized against polio or anything else? Speaker 0: That so in other words, we may be fighting a tiger that died. Speaker 5: That's quite correct. Ask the people in Great Britain. Ask the people in Japan who Speaker 6: All all all the Speaker 0: casting Gentlemen, if you please, I've got probably the smartest audience we've ever had. Speaker 3: I have a question. How long a delayed action, if any, would you connect this with like MS? Speaker 0: Is MS a possibility? Would multiple sclerosis be one of the possible results? Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, there's a new publication that just came out from John Hoffman, who's a close associate of Tony Morris's, that gives the references linking MS in later life to the early introduction of live virus vaccines like measles and like some of the others that are live viruses. Now at the present time I would recommend that anybody who has MS or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or any of those degenerative neurologic conditions of later life carefully review their vaccine histories. Speaker 10: I would also like to comment to that because in connection with my case, I've been some research. Speaker 0: Let me tell them once again, Ms. Gundy, that you are a Guillain Barre victim, contracted following the, following your receipt of the, swine flu vaccination Speaker 10: in I 7AM in the process of writing a book about my experience and in the process I've done considerable research. And from what I have learned, it looks as if immunizations frequently cause autoimmune diseases, not only Guillain Barre syndrome, but lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, and other types of things. Now I have no data at this We Speaker 0: should also say that there's a good deal of evidence suggesting that multiple sclerosis may be the result of distemper in an animal that the victim received during childhood. Speaker 6: Now, Speaker 0: none of this is absolutely nailed to the wall. But that's the problem with this. How's a what's a mother to do with all of these balls in the air and nobody really certain Speaker 10: I would just like to also comment that we had forty six million people vaccine vaccinated with the swine flu shot. And I have written to Ralph Nader's organization. I have written to some of the government organizations trying to get them to do a survey, a long going survey to see if these vaccinations do cause autoimmune diseases or what the reactions are. I can't even get a response because I'm not a doctor. I have no clout. I'm a nobody. Speaker 0: Missus Grant, why were you shaking your head? Speaker 8: Phil, it isn't only with that vaccine. It's with all vaccines. They are not interested in the adverse reactions. As a matter of fact, if I may, I'd like to invite anyone to write to me if they've had an adverse reaction. I'd like to help the government because they don't want to know, but I would like to know. Speaker 14: I am a mother of three children and I have been informed and I've read up on these things. And I chose not to vaccinate my children, but when they get Speaker 8: to school, why is it that Speaker 14: I have to fight for my rights as a mother and the choice I've made? Speaker 0: Let me just quickly, we're long, but that's a very important question. Are the states in which you either have the totally free decision about whether or not to vaccinate or there's, we're calling them loophole states. States where they're not going to send your child to solitary if you don't have his card, you know? Alright, California. Not all children must be immunized in these states. Some require religious reasons. Some places there is a bureaucratic humma humma you have to go through to prove that you're this or that. Others it's probably easier. So just for the sake of simplifying this, Colorado, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin. If your state is not on there, it means that your child is going to be left at the kindergarten door feeling very, very much an outcast because he didn't get his immunization shots. And we'll be back in a moment. Speaker 10: I would like to say that I think it's the American people's responsibility that they should ask the doctor and the nurses before any injection is given to the child. Should it be given or should Speaker 8: it not? The doctors don't have time to Speaker 3: tell you. You should ask. Speaker 0: The doctors what? Speaker 10: I'm a registered nurse, and I don't think the doctors have a lot of time to go and say, this is all the things that can happen to your child. I think they should say, that it's the mother's responsibility to say, hey doctor, I would like to know. Speaker 15: On my last child's DVT shot I did ask. He was not given a P, he was only given a DT. I was not given an answer as to why the P was taken out nor was I given an answer as to what are the chances of whooping cough and can it be cured if my child got it? Speaker 0: State? Here. Speaker 5: Bill? Bill, I gotta jump in. Speaker 2: Yes. You Speaker 5: know, the issue is one of balance and perspective. And we shouldn't forget there were fifty some thousand cases of polio in 1955. And this year, Bob didn't answer the question. There are seven cases of polio in The United States this year. There have been an average of roughly a dozen for the last six or eight years. In Great Britain, they've had over a hundred thousand cases of pertussis in the last five years. Five or six percent of those cases of pertussis had convulsions. Five thousand kids were hospitalized. Yes. There were more deaths among the less than one year olds than the others. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 5: There's a couple other points. Speaker 0: Let's also say that Dade County, Florida, South Florida has sustained of late measles epidemic. Epidemic means millions. That what isn't what it means. There are a significant number of measles cases in Dade County, not the kind of alarming numbers we used to know before the vaccine. But most Speaker 7: of those cases occurred in vaccinated children. Speaker 0: Is that right? Speaker 7: In Dade County. Speaker 0: Because one would be one would be the amateur analyst would be would conclude that it might have to do with refugees who may not have been inoculated in their home country. Speaker 2: No vaccine. They're trying to blame it on the refugees, but but what Tony Moore said is absolutely correct. I want to ask you one question. Sure. All your statistics, why doesn't the doctor tell that to the patient? Why doesn't the doctor say to them, this is your chance on this side, Speaker 6: this is Speaker 7: your chance on this side? Speaker 5: Oh gosh. You know, there's so many hours. Speaker 2: You know that, we try. Speaker 6: Why would we try? Speaker 2: As that nurse Speaker 0: Doctor, asked. Yeah. I specifically asked. Know this woman stood up to say the doctor doesn't have time and you have said there are so many hours in the day. The feeling we get, not among all the people in your beloved industry, but among many is that your job is to do and to push and to wrap things around our arm and either send us to the hospital or to the drugstore. Your job is not to talk to us. And that's and it's that attitude that's making life so miserable for so for your whole industry today. Speaker 8: Bill, absolutely. Speaker 5: Bill, I think you're right. We have to have doctors who both talk with patients and listen to them. And one of the things we try to train our pediatricians in training is that their most important job is educating parents to be competent parents. That includes all this. Speaker 2: Well, try, but you don't succeed. Yes. Speaker 8: Talked about Speaker 3: it earlier in the show about Reye's syndrome and aspirin. And I think I'd really like to hear more about that because my children are of an age now where they're getting fevers from school and so forth. It's really Speaker 0: hope you've got very little time where we're gonna start another fight but we're gonna do it. We'll do that in just a moment. Recently there's been oh I should say that that's your we should give them the pop on that. That's the dissatisfied parents together. DPT, not surprisingly, that's Box 563. This is your effort to encourage those who feel that they might have sustained family crisis because of vaccination to communicate with each other. 1377 K Street Northwest Washington DC. The zip is 20005. Obviously there, you know, there's a lot, you get a lot more done if you've got a crowd out in front of city hall. Speaker 8: Yeah, anyone can write to me also. I'd be happy to, to, to hear from them, especially if had you've adverse reactions. Speaker 2: Well, a matter of fact, the next time they come to you and ask for a contribution to the American Heart Association or the American Cancer Society, we should tell them that we're going to give our contributions to your organization instead. Speaker 0: Oh, they're going to love you for that. Me give us your briefest speech regarding Reye's syndrome and its possible link with the aspirin ingestion during fever in childhood. Speaker 2: Well, American the Academy of Pediatrics today is trying to get out from under. They're trying to say that there's no link between aspirin and Reye syndrome because they're so scared of lawsuits that might come up. As far as I'm concerned, I advise you and every other parent to pay attention to the media today because their reports on Reye's syndrome are more accurate than those of the medical journalists. Speaker 0: Okay, but what do Speaker 5: you That's do with a cheap shot. The members of the academy have spent hundreds of hours trying to look at the information relating to Reye's syndrome and whether or not aspirin may play a causal role. The answers aren't completely in yet. And what pediatricians have been advised to do is to tell their parents to be prudent about the use of aspirin. Most of the aspirin that we use for children isn't really necessary. The answers aren't in. We're doing the best we can to get a clearer picture. In the meantime, Speaker 0: prudent. Here's the problem though, Doctor. Cooper. It is not absolutely clear that you are doing the best you can to find out whether there's a link. That, that we really don't, we really are terribly disorganized in every, in every sense in this country. We've got a fragmented country. So so it's kind of hard to be indignant about your discipline. But I don't think you're any different. The problem with you is that when you're not together, we hurt more because of the potential damage of not sure CDC in Atlanta may or may not be talking to people. How many statistics are are being gathered? How many blind studies are being how much information is Not coming to this Speaker 7: enough, Bill. Not enough. There was enough evidence on Speaker 2: Lyme syndrome. Once more, we've Speaker 0: got another doctor coming forward to saying we're doing our best. Be prudent. Hey. We need Speaker 6: to do more as well, Speaker 5: this public has to ask for more. And this public has to tell its legislators they can't Speaker 6: cut. And we Speaker 0: need more doctors who are not quite as defensive, who are open to the improvements that have to be made. Speaker 5: Of course we do. Speaker 0: Doctor. Moore. Speaker 7: The evidence that was presented to Secretary Schweiker as the relationship between aspirin or eye syndrome convinced him that there should be a label on aspirin. The pharmaceutical company got together and lobbied and did away with that notification. So as of now, secretary Schweiker has backed away from that position that he took after hearing the evidence. Speaker 0: Is the caller there? Speaker 9: Yes. Speaker 0: Not much time. Speaker 9: Yes. I would like to say first of all that I am terrified at the fact that learning that after the third shot the one woman's boy got the symptoms of having neurological damage. Yeah. I felt that with my eight and a half month old daughter that once she got the first shot and she was fine, that I was safe, that she wasn't gonna have any problem. Mhmm. I'm surprised to hear that this is going this could happen next time she gets a shot. Does do the chances get less as the child gets older or what? Am I do I Speaker 6: have to Speaker 9: go through the sphere all the time? Speaker 0: You're talking about Emily Yankovich. Yeah. Speaker 3: Right. With this our daughter, it happened after the second shot. But it can happen after any any immunization. Would there's even evidence that problems can show up later in life, but they're not proven statistics. And so we, there's nothing that we can say for sure, but you have to be aware of that. And also if your children have any, if there's any history of central nervous system disorders in the family, any neurological problems in the family, or any seizures in the family, a child should never get protected. Speaker 6: Thank you. I Speaker 3: just want to know instead of aspirin, should we give our children Tylenol? Will that prevent, is there that big of a difference? Speaker 0: Bob, I'm afraid I don't have the time for you to answer that And we'll be back in just a moment.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Unmistakable cases of vaccine brain injury were rebranded into a vague, amorphous spectrum. Suddenly, the trauma parents had witnessed became too abstract and “complicated” to debate. Another PR victory achieved.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The rise in “mild autism” is the other side of the same coin. Less severe vaccine injuries manifest as quirks or traits, while the severe cases—what’s now called “profound autism”—are buried under the same label. The vast and often shifting spectrum with no concrete definitions hides the real pattern. And it is very likely by design.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc If you’ve sensed autism diagnoses just don’t add up, this report from @MidwesternDoc explains why. midwesterndoctor.com/p/erasing-ence…

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc The 1986 Vaccine Injury Act was supposed to protect families. Instead, it removed liability from manufacturers and left “safety enforcement” up to HHS discretion. Predictably, the rules were gutted. Injuries skyrocketed. Accountability disappeared. And now here we are.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc One provision required compensation for encephalopathy—brain damage caused by vaccines. But if these vaccine injured children were suddenly classified as autistic, and vaccines “don’t cause autism,” there’s no compensation. Word games with real consequences.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Gavin DeBecker’s new book Forbidden Facts shows this isn’t new. The same PR machine that buried vaccine injury also buried: • Agent Orange toxicity • Gulf War Syndrome • SIDS links to vaccines • Breast implant illness And when I say the same, in some cases I mean the exact same people were involved in the cover-up of Agent Orange toxicity and vaccine injury. The same patterns. The same playbook. The same people. All recycled endlessly.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Right now and for the next few days, Forbidden Facts is free to download on Amazon. https://www.amazon.com/Forbidden-Facts-Government-Suppression-Childhood-ebook/dp/B0FJ2PQ7XJ/ I highly recommend you get this book, educate yourself on the history of just how much we’ve been lied to, and you raise your voice. We’re in the midst of a massive awakening and we can all contribute. Let’s unwind the decades of vaccine propaganda and stop the harm once and for all.

Forbidden Facts: Government Deceit & Suppression About Brain Damage from Childhood Vaccines Buy Forbidden Facts: Government Deceit & Suppression About Brain Damage from Childhood Vaccines: Read Kindle Store Reviews - Amazon.com amazon.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

We’ve figured it out and we’re not falling for it again. They craft reports that imply safety, but never outright state it. The media and “experts” misquote these reports as definitive proof. And the cycle goes on and on. It’s a deception loop. It’s not science. It’s simple successful public relations. The truth is clear. Vaccines are causing incredible damage.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Polls now show 56% of American voters believe COVID vaccines caused mass deaths. Distrust is growing. The public knows what PR can’t erase: too many were harmed to deny it anymore. This is why hearings, books, and whistleblowers are gaining traction fast.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Want to see how PR firms rigged the autism debate? Read @MidwesternDoc’s full breakdown: midwesterndoctor.com/p/erasing-ence…

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Ron Johnson’s Senate hearing on September 9th exposed it all. We must not let this information slide into oblivion as the news cycle pushes forward. • Vaccinated children have 3–6X higher rates of chronic illness • Data has routinely been buried to avoid backlash • Pharma-backed witnesses crumble and repeat PR talking points under questioning The hearing went viral for a reason.

Video Transcript AI Summary
02/2013, the Institute of Medicine, commissioned by HHS, reviewed the CDC's childhood vaccine schedule and concluded, "the studies designed to examine the long term effects of the cumulative number of vaccines or other aspects of the immunization schedule have not been conducted." It also stated, "there is no evidence that the schedule is not safe," and noted, "The IRM report did say it is, quote, possible to make the comparison, meaning through vaccinated, unvaccinated children, through analyses of patient information contained in large databases such as the vaccine safety data link, end quote." Has it been done? I don't know. Has it been published? No. In 2017, ICAN sought this study; Del Bigtree met Dr. Marcus Zervos, who agreed to conduct it at Henry Ford. The study found vaccinated children had higher rates of asthma, atopic disease, autoimmune disease, and neurodevelopmental disorders; ADHD occurred in the vaccinated but not unvaccinated; about 16,000 vs 2,000. After ten years, 57% vs 17% had at least one chronic health issue. It was not published because its findings did not fit the belief and policy that vaccines are safe; "we can protect children from infectious disease, and we can protect children from vaccine harms."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Leading up to, 02/2013, the Institute of Medicine was commissioned by the United States Department of Health and Human Services to review the entire body of existing scientific literature to assess the safety of the CDC's childhood schedule as a whole. HHS paid the IOM to do that. After the IOM engaged in that task with a panel of multidisciplinary scientists, it concluded, quote, the studies designed to examine the long term effects of the cumulative number of vaccines or other aspects of the immunization schedule have not been conducted, have not been conducted, end quote. That's the Institute of Medicine's finding after reviewing the entire body of scientific literature. Meaning, the IOM could not find studies comparing as you would do to study the safety of a product, an exposed group, meaning kids that got vaccines, the childhood schedule with unvaccinated children, kids who got no vaccines, which is what you would need to assess the safety of the schedule. Lacking evidence to support safety, the best the IOM can conclude was, quote, there is no evidence that the schedule is not safe, end quote. This, of course, also means the IOM cannot find evidence to conclude that the schedule is safe. The IRM report did say it is, quote, possible to make the comparison, meaning through vaccinated, unvaccinated children, through analyses of patient information contained in large databases such as the vaccine safety data link, end quote, which used to be housed at the CDC. But to date, the government has still not conducted this comparison. By the way, the CDC conducted published a white paper in 2015 on how to do that study. Has it been done? I don't know. Has it been published? No. In 02/2017, one of our clients, senator Johnson said earlier, the Informed Consent Action Network, wanted to see this exact study of comparing vaccinated versus unvaccinated children. As the, trailer you just watched noted, Del Bigtree, ICANT CEO, had met doctor Marcus Servis at one point, who was the head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical Center. And he agreed to meet and to potentially do the study. He is a conducts clinical trials for vaccines, including for the Moderna COVID nineteen vaccine. He's a validly pro vaccine. And when we met him, we argued that this was an opportunity to shut the anti vaxxers up about their claim that unvaccinated children are healthier. To our surprise, doctor Zervis said he would conduct the study. He recruited a chief epidemiologist and two statisticians within Henry Ford to do so. These were mainstream scientists who no doubt held orthodox views regarding vaccines. In early twenty twenty, I received a copy of the study. It showed the results of the analysis comparing children enrolled in Henry Ford from 2000 to 2016 from birth onward who had no vaccines compared to those who had one or more vaccines. This study was based on actual medical records. Meaning, finally, a large vaccinated versus unvaccinated study using health data from a major United States health institution, something, as the IOM pointed out, never existed before. The study began by explaining it set out to reduce vaccine hesitancy by assuring parents the CDC vaccine schedule is safe instead. What these researchers found was that vaccinated children had four point two nine times the rate of asthma, three point zero three times the rate of atopic disease, five point nine six times the rate of autoimmune disease, and five point five three times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders, which included three point two eight times the rate of developmental delay, and four point four seven times the rate of speech disorder. All of these findings were statistically significant. There was also other conditions for which there were numerous cases in the vaccinated group, but zero the unvaccinated group. Hence, a rate cannot be calculated, including brain dysfunction, ADHD, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, and ticks. For example, there were two hundred sixty cases of ADHD in the vaccinated group, and there were none in the unvaccinated group. In this study, there were around sixteen thousand kids in the vaccinated group, by the way, and around two thousand in the unvaccinated group. So the rate, of course, between those is important, and that's what the study compared. These findings were troubling, including because these chronic health issues can be caused by immune system dysregulation, and vaccines can cause immune system dysregulation. Citations for this are in my written submission. Overall, the study found that after ten years, seventeen percent of the unvaccinated children had a chronic health issue, while fifty seven percent of the vaccinated children had at least one chronic health issue, often multiple. That's seventeen versus fifty seven percent. The only real problem with this study and why it didn't get submitted for publication is that its findings did not fit the belief and the policy that vaccines are safe. Had it found vaccinated children were healthier, it no doubt would have been published immediately. But because it found the opposite, it was shoved in a draw. We have repeatedly urged doctor Zervos and La Mirada to submit the study for publication. They have affirmed the study was well designed and conducted, but doctor Zervos has said he doesn't wanna lose his job. And doctor Lemoretta has said she does not wanna make doctors uncomfortable. This is a real world example of how the science around vaccines gets corrupted. How only studies that confirm the beliefs and policies that vaccines are safe get published. Everything else gets shoved in a draw. This selection bias is dangerous and results in corrupting all the science concerning vaccine safety. We can protect children from infectious disease, and we can protect children from vaccine harms. We should and we must do both.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Meanwhile, trust in medicine has collapsed, and I don’t see any signs that it’s going to improve anytime soon. • Trust in the CDC dropped from 80% in 2020 (pre-COVID) to 60% in 2024 • Trust in the FDA dropped from 65% to 53% from 223-2025 and is now hovering just over 30% • Only 31% now view healthcare positively • Pharma approval is at 20% Decades of propaganda are unraveling before our eyes. The truth is breaking through. We’re standing at a turning point.

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Raise your hand if you or someone you know personally had a serious adverse event to this vaccine. Raise your hand. Yep. Almost every single hand in this room was raised. 'For the con artists out of the media, it's either what's going on here?' 'Now let's go a step further. ... believe the vaccine contributed to the death of somebody that you know.' Raise your hand. '100%. Yep. Look around the room. Two people.' 'We are we're not even allowed to talk about this.' 'You just saw thousands of hands get raised, and I was very careful with how I asked the question.' 'I mean, it's beyond anything we've ever lived through in our life, and we're not even allowed to talk about it.' 'Thought police' ... 'When we're not allowed to talk about something... They got you then.' Wow. That was great video."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Raise your hand if you or someone you know personally had a serious adverse event to this vaccine. Raise your hand. Yep. Almost every single hand in this room was raised. For the con artists out of the media, it's either what's going on here? Maybe there's something that is so beyond what's not being reported. That when you have thousands of hands that go up in a room like this, I don't know about you, but I know personal stories of some very tragic reactions. Now let's go a step further. Let's say, raise your hand. If you beyond any reason of, like, beyond reasonable doubt, you believe the vaccine contributed to the death of somebody that you know. Raise your hand. 100%. Yep. Look around the room. Two people. We are we're not even allowed to talk about this. Are you kidding me? You you are governor, what's going on here? You just saw thousands of hands get raised, and I was very careful with how I asked the question. Right? And let's pretend half of the people here are wrong. Is this a scandal? No. I mean, it's beyond anything we've ever lived through in our life, and we're not even allowed to talk about it. Speaker 1: Right. And and that's the scary thing is, you know, the the well, it really is the thought police that are trying to crack down. When we're not allowed to talk about something, you know what that leads to? Those who don't want us to talk about something. Ultimately, they don't want us to think about something, and it it is a thought police type issue. They because when you are afraid to speak a truth, well, they got you then. Speaker 0: Wow. That was great video.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Despite the attacks and repeated attempts to discredit him, RFK Jr. is continuing the fight. New state reforms are popping up as we speak, more hearings are being planned, and new books are all converging. The tide is truly shifting. And for the first time in decades, we have a real chance to reclaim medicine and take back control of our health and our future.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc There is no question... The vaccines don’t cause autism narrative was built by PR, not by science. And now it’s collapsing under the weight of truth. The question is: will enough of us speak up before they try to bury it again? I believe we will.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc If this thread opened your eyes, the book will blow them wide open. Forbidden Facts uncovers decades of buried truths, and right now it’s completely FREE to grab on Amazon. Pick up your free copy: 👇 https://www.amazon.com/Forbidden-Facts-Government-Suppression-Childhood-ebook/dp/B0FJ2PQ7XJ/

Forbidden Facts: Government Deceit & Suppression About Brain Damage from Childhood Vaccines Buy Forbidden Facts: Government Deceit & Suppression About Brain Damage from Childhood Vaccines: Read Kindle Store Reviews - Amazon.com amazon.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Thanks for reading! This information was based on a report originally published by @MidwesternDoc. Key details were streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. Read the original report here. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/erasing-encephalitis-why-vaccine

Erasing Encephalitis: Why Vaccine Brain Injuries Became Autism For decades, cunning public relations tactics have buried a flood of vaccine brain injuries. Seeing through these deceptive strategies equips you to uncover the lies shaping every corner of our lives. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc For a deeper dive into what modern medicine has overlooked—or intentionally buried—check out these other eye-opening reports by @MidwesternDoc: The FDA’s 50-Year War on the Safest Painkiller Ever Discovered https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/the-fdas-50-year-war-on-the-safest

The FDA’s 50-Year War on the Safest Painkiller Ever Discovered If you thought what they did to ivermectin was bad, wait till you hear what they did to this drug. vigilantfox.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc The Decades of Evidence SSRI Antidepressants Cause Mass Shootings https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-evidence-ssri-antidepressants

The Decades of Evidence SSRI Antidepressants Cause Mass Shootings How Dangerous Must a Drug Be Before it is Pulled from the Market? midwesterndoctor.com
Saved - December 8, 2025 at 6:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I highlight atrazine, 85 million pounds sprayed yearly, now in tap water. I cite findings: chemical castration in frogs at 0.1 ppb; reduced male fertility; probable human carcinogen (prostate, breast, ovarian, lymphoma); birth defects and brain issues; hormone disruption and delayed puberty; brain effects and metabolic risks from prenatal exposure. Europe bans it; the US allows up to 3 ppb. Filter water, buy organic, and push for a ban.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨 ONE CHEMICAL IN YOUR WATER IS TURNING MALE FROGS INTO EGG-LAYING FEMALES—AND IT’S DOING THE SAME TO OUR BOYS. The EPA says it’s “safe.” Europe banned it 20 years ago. 🚨 ATRAZINE—85 million pounds sprayed yearly on U.S. corn—is in your tap water right now at levels PROVEN to wreck human hormones. Science doesn’t lie: Here are Atrazine’s Proven Harms – Straight from the Studies: - Chemical Castration: Turns male frogs into fertile females at 0.1 ppb; complete sex reversal & hermaphroditism (Hayes et al., PNAS 2002, 2010) - Crushes Male Fertility: Up to 50% lower sperm count, tiny testicles, infertility in men & animals (Swan et al., 2003; Fan et al., 2011) - Cancer Trigger: Probable human carcinogen—prostate, breast, ovarian, lymphoma, leukemia (IARC 2024; Pathak et al., 2022) - Birth Defects: Preterm birth, low birth weight, genital deformities, brain defects (Waller et al., 2010; Agopian et al., 2013) - Hormone Chaos: Mimics estrogen, tanks testosterone → delayed puberty & “chemical castration” (Cooper et al., 2000) - Brain Damage: Parkinson’s, cognitive decline, anxiety in farmworkers (multiple studies EPA buried) - Obesity & Diabetes: Prenatal exposure = adult obesity & insulin resistance (Frontiers in Endocrinology, 2020) Europe: 0 ppb allowed. USA: Up to 3 ppb “safe.” Your son’s future masculinity is collateral damage for cheap corn. Filter your water. Buy organic. Scream for a ban. Tag someone who drinks tap water. They need to see this. All cited research linked in replies below...

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker discusses atrazine, described as the second most used chemical in the country and a pesticide. Claims it is banned in Europe and worldwide, but is used domestically, and is present in 63% of drinking water. Refers to a study by a famous African American scientist named Tyrler/ Tyler Hayes at the University of Berkeley. In the experiment, he put 70 African water frogs in an aquarium and added atrazine to the water at a level below the EPA’s threshold. Results reported: 60 of the frogs became sterile, and all of those were male. Additionally, 10% of the frogs turned female and were able to produce fertile eggs, indicating a sex change. The speaker notes that, given such an animal model result, the next step would typically be to test in a mammalian model and a human model, but those tests were never conducted.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's a chemical now the second most used chemical in this country pesticide in this country is atrazine. It's banned in Europe, banned all over the world, but we use it here. It's in 63% of our drinking water. There's a famous African American scientist named Tyler Hayes, who's at the University of Berkeley. He did a famous experiment that anybody can look up on the Internet. He put 70 African water frogs in a an aquarium. He put atrazine in the water of that aquarium that was less than EPA's level. So it's less than the levels we have in 63% of our water supply. 60 of those frogs became sterile. They're all male frogs. 60 became sterile. 10% of those frogs turned female, and they were able to produce fertile eggs. So it changed their sex. And, of course, normally, you know, when you see something like that in an animal model, the first thing you wanna do is test it in a mammalian model and a human model. Those tests were never done.
Saved - January 5, 2026 at 10:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Atrazine in drinking water; studies show male frogs exposed to levels common in America turn female. Add plastic bottles with BPA and phthalates, parabens in fragrances, and oxybenzone in sunscreen. One application can keep blood levels high for 7 days. Kids apply daily on their face. Endocrine disruption at scale—everywhere. 1:20 clip inside—the silent chemical assault we’re all exposed to.

@newstart_2024 - Camus

Male feminization is happening — and it’s not just a theory Atrazine (2nd most used herbicide in North America, banned in Europe) is in drinking water. Studies show: Male frogs exposed to levels equal to many Americans turn female. Add in: - Plastic water bottles (BPA & phthalates) - Parabens in fragrances (absorbed through skin) - Oxybenzone in sunscreen (most common chemical — one application leaves it above safety limits in blood for 7 days) Kids are getting multiple applications daily on their face. This is endocrine disruption at scale — and it's everywhere. 1:20 clip inside — the silent chemical assault we’re all exposed to.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses chemical exposure and endocrine disruption, focusing on atrazine and common consumer products. Atrazine is described as a herbicide and the second most used herbicide in North America, after glyphosate. The speaker notes atrazine is illegal in Europe and claims that in Europe it’s not allowed at all. They state that “they’ll call it male feminization” when animals are exposed to atrazine, giving an example: a frog exposed to two hundred nanograms per deciliter of atrazine becomes female, turning a male frog female. The implication is that such exposures reflect effects seen in many Americans. Beyond atrazine, the speaker mentions plastic water bottles and the presence of fragrance and parabens that rub onto the skin, leading to skin absorption of these chemicals. The discussion then shifts to sunscreen chemicals, specifically oxybenzone, described as by far the most widely used chemical in sunscreen and an estrogen endocrine disruptor that acts like estrogen in the body. A study is cited: after publishing a book, a study on oxybenzone and one application of sunscreen found that seven days later, oxybenzone levels in people’s blood were above government safety limits. This observation is presented as applying to an adult who used oxybenzone once, with some people applying sunscreen five days a week to children or more, contributing to multiple daily applications. The speaker ties this to personal care products that claim to keep the face protected from the sun, implying frequent use leads to higher exposure. Key points emphasized include the prevalence of atrazine use in North America, its alleged legal status in Europe, the concept of “male feminization” in animals due to atrazine exposure, and the broader concern about everyday products—plastic bottles, fragrances, parabens, and sunscreen (notably oxybenzone)—as sources of estrogenic or endocrine-disrupting chemicals, with a cited study showing one application of sunscreen resulting in blood levels exceeding safety limits after seven days. The overall narrative links environmental chemical exposure to potential reproductive and hormonal effects, highlighting concerns about consumer products and regulations across regions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Call it male feminization. Whenever you're adding all these chemicals, atrazine is the big one that's often studied. It's a it's a herbicide. It's the second most used herbicide in North America. I don't know if you've heard of atrazine. Right. Yeah. It's in the drinking water. Totally illegal in Europe, by the way. They don't even allow it in Europe. It's crazy. And then in America, it's the second most used after glyphosate. But they'll call it male feminization. You give these animals atrazine exposures, and they're equal exposures to a lot of Americans. And like, for example, if you have a frog and you've got him in two hundred nanograms per deciliter of atrazine, 200, that male frog turns female. Now you've got a female frog. But it's not just atrazine because you're now you got the plastic water bottles. Oh, and you've got all this fragrance and all these parabens rubbing it on your skin. Your skin is absorbing all this stuff. Oh, and now you've got, like, sunscreen chemicals. Right? We haven't even talked about that. But oxybenzone in sunscreen, by far the most widely used chemical in sunscreen, that's an estrogen endocrine disruptor. It acts like estrogen in your body. And they did a study. After I published my book, they did a study with oxybenzone and one application of sunscreen. Just one. Seven days later, it was above the government's safety limits in people's blood. And that's just an adult with one application of oxybenzone. And some people are putting on their kids, like, five days a week. Was putting on multiple applications. Like personal care products that brag about, like, keeping your face protected from the sun.
Saved - February 9, 2026 at 1:43 PM

@RedactedNews - Redacted

🚨 Please Share: Your antidepressants might just be the most dangerous drug in the world. Former FDA medical officer & founder of the world’s largest psychiatric drug tapering clinic joins us to break down the risks. @taperclinic is with us. https://t.co/PgqnQHX48Z

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Josef Duhring and Dr. Yosef (Doctor Yosef Duhring) discuss antidepressants and SSRIs, outlining perceived risks, data limitations, and long-term concerns, followed by practical guidance on tapering and contact information for a tapering clinic. Key side effects and risks cited - Common side effects: gastrointestinal issues (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea), changes in sleep (insomnia or drowsiness), headaches, nervousness, restlessness, dry mouth, sweating, tremors, sexual dysfunction, decreased libido, difficulty reaching orgasm, erectile dysfunction, appetite and weight changes (gain or loss). - Other reported effects: emotional blunting, feeling less like yourself, dizziness, balance issues (especially early in treatment), increased sweating, abnormal dreams. - Serious but rarer risks: suicidal thoughts or behaviors, particularly under age 25; serotonin syndrome (described as rare); heart rhythm changes at high doses with some SSRIs. - Behavioral effects: mania, psychosis, irritability, aggression; rare but potentially misdiagnosed as bipolar disorder; in some cases leading to escalation to lithium or antipsychotics. - Sleep and long-term effects: SSRI use diminishing sleep quality (less REM and deep sleep), resulting in fatigue and brain fog in long-term users. - Long-term data gaps: “there has never been a randomized control study that looked at them for over a year,” and “seventy percent of antidepressant users are on these drugs for two years or more.” Claims that there is no long-term data on sustained efficacy or safety beyond eight to twelve weeks. Efficacy and data concerns - Most drugs reach market based on eight-week studies; there is a reported two-point difference on a 52-point depression scale between the drug and placebo, which is described as clinically very low. - Outcomes most meaningful to patients (employment, relationships, life meaning) are not directly measured in standard trials, which focus on scale-based movement. - The claim is made that long-term efficacy remains unproven and that the long-term data are unavailable. Observations about prescription patterns and systemic factors - Online “pill mill” platforms allegedly enable easy access to SSRIs (Lexapro), sometimes without video chats, via online questionnaires, with rapid mail delivery. - The dose of prescription and patient interactions are affected by time constraints and economic incentives in healthcare delivery, leading to faster checklists and medication-based treatments rather than in-depth discussions of life context, relationships, or non-drug approaches. - An “unholy alliance” between the pharmaceutical industry and academic medicine is described: investigators may pursue drug trials for career advancement and publications funded by drug companies, potentially biasing conclusions in favor of medications. - The FDA’s stance is portrayed as influenced by this environment, with concerns about regulatory capture and inadequate critical evaluation of risks, including suicide risk data and withdrawal issues. Key long-term and withdrawal considerations - Long-term withdrawal: physicians are described as telling patients that antidepressant withdrawal is mild and resolves in two weeks, but tapering often requires one to two years to avoid withdrawal symptoms; many are tapered too quickly, leading to relapse or withdrawal challenges. - Tapers and recovery: the clinician reports patients improving emotionally during tapering, sometimes even before complete discontinuation; success depends on broader life health improvements (physical health, relationships, purpose) and careful, gradual reduction. Three major concerns observed with antidepressants (as described by Dr. Yosef) - They don’t work for many patients in the long term; diminished efficacy over time due to emotional blunting and neurochemical adaptation. - Behavioral and cognitive changes: potential for mania, psychosis, irritability, and misdiagnosis as bipolar disorder; risk of “drug-induced” psychiatric symptoms. - Toxicity and sleep: long-term blunting reduces emotional responsiveness; chronic sleep disruption and brain fog; long-term toxicity may underlie persistent symptoms after prolonged use. Clinical implications and guidance offered - For those considering antidepressants, emotions matter and should be explored beyond a chemical-imbalance narrative; discuss physical health, relationships, purpose, substances, and non-drug approaches (therapy, lifestyle changes) before relying on medication. - For those already on SSRIs, a careful, patient-guided taper is advised: slowly reduce dosages, use approaches such as liquid tapering to control precise reductions, and listen to one’s body to avoid withdrawal; a two-year taper may be necessary for many patients. - Coming off antidepressants can reveal or restore aspects of life and personality; benefits may appear during tapering as engagement and motivation return, but life circumstances must be addressed in parallel to avoid relapse. Contact information - Tapering clinic website: taperclinic.com (for patients in the U.S.; clinic claims to operate in about 15–16 states, covering roughly 70% of the population). - YouTube channel for further resources: Doctor Yosef (German version) with a free drug tapering training (about five hours) and guidance for working with a doctor. Speaker names - Dr. Yosef Duhring (referred to as Doctor Josef Duhring in the discussion) and Dr. Yosef (the same speaker) are cited; their experiences include FDA and industry roles and a tapering clinic specializing in antidepressant withdrawal and discontinuation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are antidepressants or SSIs the most dangerous drugs in the world? Consider this list of side effects: gastrointestinal nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, changes, insomnia, sometimes drowsiness just throughout the day, headaches, nervousness, restlessness, dry mouth, sweating, tremors, sexual dysfunction, decreased libido, difficulty reaching any kind of orgasm, erectile dysfunction, appetite, weight changes, weight gain, or occasionally, weight loss. Other side effects, just here's a few of them, reported in this practice. Emotional blunting, feeling less like yourself, like you kind of walk around like a zombie Dizziness Balance issues, especially early in the treatment Increased sweating Abnormal dreams, less common, but here are some other important risks. Suicidal thoughts or behaviors in some people, and especially, this is the thing that stands out to me, especially under the age of 25, suicidal thoughts, which is recognized risk and and is being monitored clinically. We have the the data on that. Serotonin syndrome. It's rare. I don't know know exactly what that is. We'll find out. Here's other some rare but potentially, different risks. Heart rhythm changes. Some SSRIs have that at high doses. And consider that almost every mass shooting in The United States over the past few decades have had one common denominator. The shooters were almost always on antidepressants, almost always on SSRIs. Doctor Josef Duhring is a renowned a renowned psychiatrist, former FDA medical officer who would review this data, and founder of the world's leading psychiatric drug tapering clinic to help people get off of these drugs. And doctor Youssef joins us now. Great to have you here. Thank you so much, doctor, for joining us. Speaker 1: Hey, Clayton. Thanks so much for having me. What I wanna say from the start is the the you know, everything that you were saying about are these the most dangerous drugs out there? All drugs have side effects and there's certainly drugs out there with, I mean, was quite a list, Clayton, but there are drugs out there with nastier side effects. The issue with the antidepressants is that no one talks about them. It's the fact that we all pretend that these are fairly benign, ubiquitous, widely used drugs, which celebrities are talking about, we hear about them all the time. And because of that, we think that they're just normal and they're safe. And so the public are not being told that they can cause emotional blunting, sexual dysfunction, sometimes permanent, they can make people suicidal and violent. And that's the story here is that there's a huge disconnect between what people are told about these drugs and what the data actually show. Speaker 0: Can you maybe step back for us a little bit and give our audience an understanding of how you came to this? I mean, you worked at the FDA, and we know how widely these are administered and they're just sort of I mean, very it seems like a very minimal threshold in order to even get these administered or prescribed for people and just, Oh yeah, here's antidepressants, antidepressants, When did you hit a wall with this and know that there was a much bigger problem here? Speaker 1: Yeah, well, Clayton, on that issue of how easy it is to get them, you don't even need to see someone anymore. There are platforms like HIMSS and ForHERS. These are really online pill mill pharmacies. These are the places that are flogging GLP-1s right now, where you essentially just, you know, fill out an online questionnaire, and then you get some boilerplate text language that supposedly comes from an NP, no video chat or anything like that. And they send you Lexapro, an SSRI in the mail within a couple of days. It's a brave new world, it's very dangerous. So that's where we are right now with the ease of getting these. But onto what you were saying before, how did I get here? Well, so I'm a medical doctor and then I went to a subspecialty school to become a psychiatrist. And I mean, really the story is there was something very off about the way we were treating mental health conditions. I came into, my love for psychiatry grew out of an interest in personal development really, and, you know, just general health. And, you know, if you can put your life in order in a good way, and if you can be physically healthy, mental health usually follows. And what I saw in my internship was we were just sitting down with people for twenty minutes and putting them on medications. And they sort of tell you that it, well, you know, these are medical conditions and so you can diagnose them just like other medical conditions by, you know, just getting a list of symptoms and you can use these drugs because it's believed that the underlying cause for these conditions is biological or chemical, you know, a chemical imbalance. And so I had a double take at that because I was like, well, intuitively to me and to a lot of other people as well, I think we recognize that things like anxiety and depression are multifaceted, they can come from a whole range of different things. And to simplify it in that way, it just seemed off, but I was low man on the totem pole and I wasn't gonna ruffle any feathers. So I just went along with it. So I saw people in twenty minute visits, put thousands of people on SSRI medications. And what I saw during my training was just that people weren't getting better. The drugs would gradually wear off over time. This would lead to needing higher and higher doses and eventually additional meds. Some people would get worse. We'd have people who were coming in for benign issues like, well, sorry, not benign, these were upsetting issues, like maybe you move city and you're lonely, or you go through a breakup and you have this temporary stressor. And so they would get put on antidepressants and then a couple months later, they would be diagnosed with bipolar disorder because they would have a side effect of agitation. And so people just weren't getting better. And this is where I became very interested in drug side effects. And I would talk to my professors and I would say, well, you know, there's got to be something wrong about this model because it's not working. And they would just say, you know, these drugs are safe and effective, Yosef. You you've seen, you know, the FDA has approved them. And that's when I became really interested in drug safety research. And so I dedicated my career at that time to investigating the research base supporting the safety and effectiveness of psychiatric drugs. I got a job at Johnson and Johnson with Janssen, which is Speaker 0: the Speaker 1: largest pharmaceutical manufacturer out there. And I worked in clinical development, developing psychiatric medications to see what was happening in the clinical trials. And then I went to the FDA where I had a much larger portfolio of psychiatric medications. And when I was behind the scenes and I got to see how these drugs, like the evidence base like this, because we would always tell patients, you know, the drugs are safe and effective, but you know, based on what? So And when I got to be in the pharmaceutical industry and then at the FDA, I could see what this was based on and that eventually led me to the position I now hold, which is that these drugs are much less effective than people think they are and they are much more dangerous than people are aware of. Speaker 0: Much less effective. Can you talk about that? And then we'll get into the dangerous piece of this. Did you, what did you discover that how the ineffective they are? Speaker 1: Well, the major thing is, so most of these drugs make it onto the market in eight week studies, right? So you have a placebo study, half of the people get the drug, half the people get the placebo, and then you follow them for eight weeks. Now, we've looked at the, I guess the difference in the effect between the drug and the placebo, it's two points on a 52 scale. So that's what they're saying is effective. There was a two point separation on a 52 scale. That is clinically very low, you know? And then the other issue is that they don't measure things that most people care about. You know, most people, when you say, well, it's gonna improve your depression. They might start thinking, well, you know, hopefully this is gonna be correlated with, you know, better employment, you know, better relationships, you know, the things that people really care about it, it's not, it's all based on just how things move on a scale, on a depression scale. So you can just blunt someone out and it looks like the drug is doing better because that's how they measure the effect. But the real issue, and this is the biggest scandal out there is that there's never been a randomized control study that's looked at them for over a year. And so most of them are eight to twelve weeks, but nothing went longer than a year. And if you think about that, you know, seventy percent of antidepressant users are on these drugs for two years or more. We actually have no idea what happens long term, whether we still get that very small two point difference. Like it's just Speaker 0: We have no data. Speaker 1: We have no idea. There's no data. Speaker 0: Long term studies. That's unbelievable to me. No long term data. Speaker 1: No long term data. I think most people who work in this space and maybe even many antidepressant users or their families, I mean, it's like, I think it's like, it's getting close to twenty percent of people take these drugs. So most people know someone on them. You just look, how are they doing long term? It's not like someone gets on Lexapro and they sail off into the distance and they never have any mental health problems. They're usually not doing too hot. Speaker 0: It's so and not funny, sad, really, that you use the term sailing off because you'll see these commercials on television, right? And it's there's no reason to feel this down in the dumps and it always shows somebody's getting on a sailboat and like sailing off and living now the best years of their life. That's a sunset and they're on a sailboat and now they're finally happy. They can live the rest of their days. It it implies that they can live out the rest of their days sailing around on these sunsets and they're just happy now. They don't have to deal with all of the pain of life anymore. Speaker 1: Yeah. And that's clearly a lie. And then that very has consciously manufactured by the pharmaceutical industry. And unfortunately my profession of psychiatrists who have a guild interest in promoting the benefits of these drugs outside of really what the evidence shows. Because when you boil it down, what this really is, I mean, there's no chemical imbalance. The way these drugs work is by blunting emotions. And yes, that can be therapeutic if you're in a crisis, but whenever you use drugs to treat emotional states, you worry about issues like tolerance. So the drug simply wearing off over time, which is very common. And you also worry about issues of toxicity because the human brain is not designed to be in a drugged state for years and decades. I mean, eventually something breaks and that's really what I see every day in my practice now. I mean, I help people once these drugs turned on them and they get really sick. And a lot of it is just the long term load of being in a drugged state for years or decades. Speaker 0: So we have this eight weeks of data, but you and your practice at the tapering clinic, you're watching people. Can you give an average of, like, how long your average patient has been on one of these drugs that you're working with? Speaker 1: Decades, really. I mean, these these drugs hit hit the mainstream in the early nineties and not in like a little way, like Prozac comes onto the market in 'eighty seven and it's a blockbuster by the early '90s. And it's just steadily going up since then. And now, I mean, it's like, Clayton, some of these statistics are frightening. Like if we just look at women, twenty percent of women are on antidepressants. If you go to the 50 category, it's one in three, one in three women 50 are on antidepressant medications now. It's it's just insane. And so given that they've been out for a long time, most of the people I'm seeing, we're talking decades. Speaker 0: So decades and you're seeing what commonalities are you seeing? Obviously, you're not doing a clinical study, but based on the amount of patients you've had and the long term past that eight weeks, many of them decades, what are some commonalities you're seeing among these people? Speaker 1: So I worry about three things, and let's just zero in on antidepressants because it's the most common. So the first thing is just that the drug doesn't work. They'll say things like, well, you know, it used to work nicely at the beginning, there was this nice effect, but now the drug is barely doing anything. So that's really common. It just Is that true? Thing that's Speaker 0: Like, is that true, or is that, like, just a mental state and they just because it's they've just gotten so used to it. What do you think? Speaker 1: I think it's I think it's true because I think what happens is, you know, the characteristic effect of an SSRI is one of the emotional blunting. And so let's say you're a very anxious person, you take this and you feel this sense of calm, but you know, six months into it, that kind of diminishes because our bodies like to maintain a certain balance of our neurotransmitters. A lot of people like to think that, you know, serotonin, dopamine, all these chemicals, these are just, you know, they work in small sections of the brain and they only control your mood, but that's not true at all. I mean, serotonin, for instance, it's involved in your gut health, the way your heart beats and your immune system. So if you take drugs that alter that, your body actively pushes against it. And that's why six months into it, people will say like, well, I feel like the drug is only working ten percent now or not at all because we have adapted to the effect. And so I believe it's true. I think they're noticing diminishing drug effect over time. Speaker 0: So I'm sorry to interrupt you. You mentioned there are three things you worry about. Number one is that they don't work. What's number two? Speaker 1: Yeah. So the second thing that I see is really behavioral changes. Now at the start of the show, listed a whole bunch of frightening things like suicidal behavior. I'll add to that list. There's things like mania, there's things like psychosis, there's things like irritability and aggression. And so many people who get put on these medications, they will have rare side effects. And I call them rare because our biology is all different. We have different genetics. You can have ninety nine people out of 100 take an SSRI and none of this stuff happens. But if you're that one person who for whatever reason, your brain's just wide a little different, you can have a manic episode on it. You could become aggressive. And so that's the other thing that I see. People will get on this drug, they'll have behavioral side effects and they'll be misdiagnosed as having bipolar disorder and then they'll get thrown on lithium and antipsychotics. And this is how you get someone who goes through a divorce or a breakup, you know, go and see the doctor, they get on a med and all of a sudden they're stuck in the psychiatric system told that they have bipolar disorder and they're getting nuked on drugs because they've had these side effects. So that's another problem that I help a lot with as well is untangling what's happened to someone when they come to me on like three different meds and they're just chronically doing poorly. And the last thing, and this is the, I think this is SSRI toxicity or it has to do with the sleep issues. So many people don't know that SSRIs diminish your sleep quality. You have less REM sleep, you have less deep sleep. These are the really important parts of sleep that allow you to feel physically rejuvenated and also emotionally stable. And what I notice in many of my long term SSRI patients is they report feeling fatigued a lot of the time and having brain fog. And the way I understand that is either chronic poor sleep quality or that just long term use of these medications has induced a brain fog fatigued state. This is frequently misdiagnosed. Doctors will just tell their patients, they'll say you have treatment resistant depression, this mysterious mental illness has now just morphed into something else. And now you need to be on like an anti psychotic medication to help the other antidepressant. It's not true. It's a long term toxicity. So those are the three things that I see a lot with antidepressants. Speaker 0: Sounds similar to, like, the effects you'd get with alcohol. You know? Lack of REM sleep. We know that even one I think even one drink affects your sleep, right, and REM sleep patterns and your ability. You're walking around with brain fog, etcetera. So then I I imagine a lot of these people also are drink probably drinking alcohol on top of taking these SSRIs, right, to kind of cope or go through life in this way. So on top of that, they're getting bad sleep and then double bad sleep, I guess, with taking alcohol too. Speaker 1: Yeah. You know, Clayton, we have completely and you're right to bring up that analogy because as soon as you start equating psychiatric medications to other well known drugs like alcohol and things like that, it becomes very obvious that, hey, maybe there's some things to be concerned about with long term use. I mean, we know you can get dementia from long term alcohol use, same with methamphetamine, cocaine. I mean, we know issues like tolerance come into play where you need to use higher and higher amounts. All of that is intuitive, but we've been telling the public that these drugs work like diabetes for insulin. Know, that there is some well known underlying biological process in the brain where you can test it with a blood test or a brain scan and see low serotonin And we're just bringing it up to the normal level. And we're getting your body back into its normal physiological state. And they tell the public this lie because it distracts them from the fact that no, we're just using drugs to manage our mood and our emotions. There's a lot of trade offs with that. Speaker 0: Can you talk about the blunting? Mean, maybe some people just say, oh, this is anecdotal, right? Because we don't have, as you point out, that long term clinical data. So maybe it's just anecdotal. Doctor, you've been seeing thousands of patients for decades, and maybe it's just anecdotal. They're all like feeling this emotional blunting. But how common is this effect? And then what does it tell us about how SSRIs are actually affecting brain function? Speaker 1: Yeah, so you're right. I mean, this isn't just an anecdotal effect because there have been studies where large groups of people on these medications have been surveyed to talk about what is the effect? And that's what they say, you know, it's an effective emotional anesthesia. You know, I can speak to it. I've taken Zoloft before, my wife has taken Zoloft before. And so I've been on SSRIs. I know what it's like to be on the drug and I've put thousands of people on it. Back in the day now I just take people off and it's just this like, it just emotionally levels you. Like if, let's say, your wife is, you're having an argument with a friend or a loved one or there's stressful things happening in your life, instead of having that full range where you're really gonna feel all of that emotion just kind of just goes and like constricts it in and everything just becomes like a two out of 10. And it's not just the negative side, it's the positive side as well. And that's why people really don't, many people don't like taking this long term. They say things like, I couldn't cry at like a funeral. I don't cry in sad movies. I don't feel things. I don't feel connected anymore. And not only is that a very troubling thing because that emotional pain can really be some of the spice of life. I mean, you need that. But the other issue that I really worry about with this is depression and anxiety. I mean, it's not a chemical imbalance. There's legitimate things happening in people's lives. You can be in bad relationships, you can have a lack of purpose, you can be spiritually lost, you can have poor physical health that's leading to emotional problems. If you just numb that out, it's like taking the batteries out of a smoke detector in your house and these problems, they just sit there in the background and they fester and you just get worse over time. And so feeling your emotions, that's like protective in many ways, and it allows you to address issues in your life. Speaker 2: Bearskin is a proud sponsor of Redacted, and we are absolutely fans of them. Bearskin has a buffet of items that you can use for cold weather, windy weather, wet weather. It is all weather gear that you need to check out. It's also quite good looking. So go to text redacted at 36912. We also wanna tell you about the Bearskin hoodie. It is a fantastic that's what you see right there. Fantastic zip up hoodie that can hold up against wind and cold temperatures. It also has several pockets. It also is customizable, with various colors. And in fact, our kids like them because you know how teenagers don't wear coats to school. It's uncool. And plus when you get inside the building, you don't wanna carry around your coat. A Bearskin hoodie, though, is a great in between, and they will take it. And we've had really cold temperatures like the rest of the country. So you can get 60 off the Bearskin hoodie today. Text redacted to 36912 or go to bear.skin/redacted. One more time, that's bear.skin/redacted or text redacted to 36912. Bearskin, you'll be so happy that you did. Speaker 0: It's crazy. I mean, I I was just speaking to a friend in in, overseas and just telling them when I was about to sit down and do this interview, and he said, yeah, you Americans and these antidepressants. It's like, it's unbelievable. And I said, yeah. It's know, in many ways, it's a lot of navel gazing as well. You know, I think I don't know. Maybe it's just like a lot of idle time too on our hands where we're not exercising. We're not interacting with people. So we're just we're sort of sitting there feeling bad for ourselves. And I remember a friend in Europe saying to me that they went to a doctor, not even a psychiatrist, just a a doctor and this person was going through something difficult, not terrible, but a little difficult in his life and the doctor was like, oh yeah, you shouldn't have to go through that and just prescribed them antidepressant. I was like, what? Yeah. It was like a version of Paxil or whatever it was. I don't know what he told but it like you shouldn't have to go through that. I mean, that is that's what we do as human beings, right? We have to experience these ups and downs, you know, heartbreak and love and all of those emotions. And now we're just sort of blunting all of it. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. And the thing is like, so the question is like, what is going on in America with antidepressants? You know, the way, because we use the most, I mean, the way I would explain this is firstly, I mean, we are the target of billions of dollars of pharmaceutical advertising. I mean, we are the biggest market, drug companies make the most out of us. And we have built this narrative around these medications that we need to be pro psychiatric medication. We need to be talking about mental health all the time because we are fighting stigma. People throw this word around like the stigma of mental illness, but we don't really think about what it means that people are just like, oh, stigma equals bad. But what they're really referring to with stigma is the idea that if someone is having anxiety or depression, that it's some kind of moral failing. In the past we would think it was a spiritual failing. Sometimes people would talk about possession and things like that but nowadays people say, well, it's because this is a bad person and they're an ineffective person and so things are happening in their life. And so we need to serve up a narrative where no, no, no, there's no personal responsibility, there's nothing morally going on, this is just medical. And so all of the doctors, we pat ourselves on the back because we're breaking down barriers, we're removing the judgment of suffering, but they replaced it with something that is complete bullshit, which is this chemical imbalance myth, which is so totally not true. It glazes over the fact that these problems are extremely complicated, you know, but they can be fixed. I mean, we need to work on our health, we need to get moving, we need to be exercising, relationships can be tough. We need to work on ourselves through personal development. We need to stop using substances. So we sidestep the messy reality of what's actually causing these problems and we fed the public a lie that it was a chemical imbalance and it could be fixed by a pill. It's not Speaker 0: so massive. Growing best up got on, I think, in the in the nineties, he he got on what was the one you mentioned? Prozac. I think it was Prozac. Yeah. Think he might he might even still be on it, to be honest with you. I wanna have him call you. But he he he described it. Oh, yeah. They just said I have a chemical imbalance. That's how they described it to him, and that's just a lie. Speaker 1: It's a it's a straight up lie, and it leads into the second reason why, and this isn't just America, this is a lot of other Westernized countries now. The other reason why we have an over prescription epidemic is just the economics of healthcare. So Clayton, back in the '90s, the major health insurance companies sort of conglomerated. And when they were able to pull together all of these patients that they had access to, they were able to negotiate lower reimbursement rates for family doctors and psychiatrists. Now, what this meant for the doctors treating those patients was you had to now see four patients in an hour to make ends meet. This was just an economic thing. And when you have that time crunch, you're naturally going to gravitate towards things that allow you to service patients in that period of time. And so diagnosing people off checklists, that's a lot faster than saying, hey, tell me about purpose and meaning in your life. Tell me about your relationships. So that takes a long time. And also helping people with drugs is obviously a lot faster than saying, Hey, let's talk about your use of alcohol. Let's talk about your cannabis. What's getting in the way of you moving your body, let's talk about your diet, that requires a lot of time, it requires you to motivate them. And if you have to see people in fifteen minute blocks and that's how you get paid and those are the incentives. Speaker 0: You're just Speaker 1: gonna get doctors who, yeah, they're just gonna say, oh, you're chemical imbalance, don't worry, I've got the cover of the FDA. FDA said this was safe and effective. And so they just dish out the drugs, they don't tell them about the risks. They just say, well, the pharmacist is gonna hand someone, the pharmacist will tell them about the risks, but everyone knows you go to the pharmacist at CVS, you you say, oh, I need this prescription. They push a pad towards you. You don't even look at it. You think you're signing like for your credit card, but it says there, you know, have you been given an opportunity to talk about the risks? And most people just, know, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes. They get the bag of drugs and they pull out the drugs, they throw away the leaflet inside and they say, well, if there was something important here, my doctor or pharmacist would have told me about it. But there's yeah, essentially there's no time either for informed consent. We're just churning people through a system. Speaker 0: So I wanna talk about the suicide piece of this. In your working with thousands of patients and we talk about the violence piece of this, that's one of the side effects listed of course, and then I mentioned of these mass shootings and they have almost all of them have a common denominator of some of them are protected by, you know, privacy laws but others we now know were on SSRIs and that information has been released. Do you see patients where they describe suicidal thoughts or wanting to carry out violence? Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Yeah. No. I hope this helps someone who's listening. So one of the most frightening things about being on psychiatric medications is that it can cause like, and this isn't common. I don't want people to think that getting on an SSRI, it's just like a one in a hundred thing. This is really more like a one in like a hundred thousand, one in a million type reaction, which will happen a lot because we have like fifteen to twenty percent of our population on this. So these are rare side effects. But when it happens, people will describe having dark taboo thoughts. I mean, are people who will start imagining gruesome things happening to them, doing gruesome things to other people. They feel like they can feel possessed at times. Their whole world can get taken over. It's just everything is darkness. There's nothing positive. Everything is evil. I mean, the case that I think is the most frightening was, oh gosh, I have remember his name. We were shoot. Give a moment, Clayton. I'm gonna look this up because this is really important. Speaker 0: Sure. And it's good that you're pointing out that it's not a one in one hundred thing. But, again, when we have these mass shootings, it only takes one in one hundred thousand or one in one million, right, to carry out something horrific at a school or or a church service or something else because they're having these dark thoughts, right? Speaker 1: Yes. Yes. And yeah. And so and so the gentleman I was talking about is David Carmichael. So David Carmichael is a Canadian man who never had serious mental illness, never violent or suicidal in the past, got put on Paxil, an antidepressant. And within a week he became psychotic and he killed his son. I think he killed his nine year old son. And so the way he describes it, so his son had a seizure disorder, that part of it is true, but then when he got on the medication, he started to experience delusions about this, that this was a terminal condition and that his son would become violent and that his son would harm others. And so in his like drug induced psychotic state, he was able to rationalize to himself that it was for the good of his family and for his son to take his life. Now David has talked publicly about this. We were just on TMZ like a few weeks ago talking about this with the whole Nick Rina's situation. And the interesting thing about this case is it was so clearly drug induced that the prosecution agreed with him. That's really unusual. Usually the defense is like, this is drug induced and the prosecution says, no, this isn't. The prosecution agreed with him. He ended up going to a psychiatric hospital and essentially got out without charges after a year of monitoring. And so we've got horrible cases like that. We've got the one with Nick Reiner which we don't have all the information yet but that does look like that could potentially have been drug induced as well. Speaker 0: I wanted you to talk maybe a little bit more about your time at the FDA and maybe the process for allowing this stuff to even hit the market in the first place. I don't know RFK Junior is kinda climbing a mountain right now trying to perhaps even remove advertising from television for this but which by the way, I mean, I used to work at Fox News. You know, I used to anchor the morning show called Fox and Friends and I mean, during that four hours of the show that we used to do, I mean, there was countless drug ads on there. So, cable news will collapse because they're largely funded by Pfizer, by all of these big pharmaceutical companies. So, like, you can wave goodbye, and I'm sure that the the amount of pushback coming from, you know, big pharma and, of course, cable news and all of this to remove this advertising there. But maybe you can just talk about maybe pull the curtain back on the FDA. Like, how are these things even allowed to hit the market knowing what they know? Speaker 1: Now this is one of the issues where, I mean, this took me like several years to digest because I was very troubled by this. And the conclusion that I came to, because I mean, these were my colleagues, I probably interacted with 20 psychiatrists and pharmacists who were expert at looking at these things and they're often coming up with very different conclusions than I am about the data. And so I have to start by talking about the relationship between the drug companies and academic medicine. And the reason I'm starting with academic medicine is because academic hospitals feed the FDA. A lot of the doctors who work at the FDA, they're burnt out academics, they like research and so they move over there. And so you have to understand the world that they come from. Now, there is an unholy alliance between the pharmaceutical industry and academic medicine and psychiatry in particular and what it's based on is career progression. And so you learn as an, if you are an academic, you're a doctor who likes research, you learn very early on in your career that one of the best ways to get promoted is to actually work with drug companies because you're applying for grants and there's two main source of grants. You can go and get a government grant from the NIH, extremely competitive, lots of people are going for them, or you can get grants from drug companies to help them run clinical trials. When you get government grants as well, you're usually doing all the legwork, you're writing your own protocols, you have to hire people in house to help you run those studies. But when you work with a drug company, they give you a protocol, they give you support staff, they give you statisticians. On top of that, they help you publish the results from the clinical trials and so you get lots of lines in your CV saying, you published all these papers and they also fly you around the world. And that's what you need to ascend academia. You need lots of peer reviewed publications and you need to talk broadly. And so very early on, you learn that it's easier to work with drug companies and that's going to be very beneficial. And when that happens, and this is the state of the situation now, you notice that the upper echelon of all academic centers right now are essentially professors who run drug company trials. And so they are very biased towards the medications, their careers are built around them and they learn that if they say anything negative about the drugs, well, the gravy train stops. You're not gonna be invited to run this next clinical trial, you're not gonna be invited to chair this panel and your career takes a hit. And so these academics and these junior academics are essentially sitting in a soup that is controlled by drug companies that where it's like be drug friendly, don't criticize the medications. And these are the attitudes and behaviors that they bring into the FDA. Because when I was there, I would talk to people about the problems with the medications and they would say things like, things that didn't even make sense. Well, we don't wanna talk about this issue between the antidepressants and suicides because what if it scares people away from life saving drugs? That's a crazy thing to even say. Like you should be committed to the truth about these medications. You shouldn't be regurgitating PR bullshit that you heard in a medical journal from Pfizer or Eli Lilly who were trying to run cover for like mass murders and suicides like happening in the public. And so I just found that they would just regurgitate this like status quo bullshit about the medications and that they were very hesitant to take a different tack and look at things really in a way that was in line with what the data was showing. It was regulatory capture but that's how it happens. Speaker 0: Right. I've heard this in other industries as well, the regulatory capture. That's such an important phrase. It's amazing to me. We don't want people oh, it can cause suicide and violence, which will mean they will take their life. We don't want them to have this medication because of the life saving effects of it. It's just it doesn't make any sense. I mean, I don't know if they hear themselves when there's Speaker 1: Well, you know, the thing that's crazy is the data shows the opposite. I mean, you talked about how the drugs make antidepressants make young people suicidal. Clayton, the black box warning says that there's an increased risk of suicide attempts for people 25 who take these medications. Now that's at a population level. And I'm gonna underline this so it's really clear for the audience. What that essentially means is when the FDA pulled together all these randomized controlled trials that had an equal number of people on placebo and an equal number of people on antidepressants, there's more suicide attempts in the group that are given antidepressants. These drugs are making people more suicidal, and it's already on the labels. And so to not talk about it, it's just moronic. Speaker 0: Also moronic is this idea that it's not addictive. Right? They tell us, these are non addictive drugs and you could use it for a little while. In your experience, is that a lie? Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, this is one of the biggest lies. I mean, we look at data that shows like the number, like how much, like the proportion of people on these medications, it goes up every single year. Well, the reason it goes up every single year is because people can't get off them because many people will go into severe withdrawal. And thank God, this is currently getting a lot of mainstream recognition. There's been pieces of this in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post and finally mainstream journalists are talking about the fact that there are hundreds of thousands of people, probably millions of people right now who are doing these really slow tapers. So this is what I do in my business. I help people come off these medications and sometimes to get off, you have to taper off them over one to two years because your brain is so adapted to them that you'd need to do these very gradual tapers so you can ease your brain off in a way that doesn't lead to a lot of anxiety and insomnia and disruption to your life. And so that's the other very scary thing is that most doctors, I mean, there's so much to share on this. Mean, doctors and myself included were trained to tell patients that antidepressant withdrawal was mild and it went away in two weeks. That's what I learned in my training and because of this, many people, even those on there for years, get pulled off in like two to four weeks and then they collapse, they do very poorly and then the doctor says, oh, well, see, it's your underlying condition, you gotta be on this for the rest of your life. Where it's like, no, you actually have to come off this drug in a much more controlled way in order to not throw yourself into like an electrical brainstorm of withdrawal. So that, I mean, that's a whole nother can of worms. Speaker 0: In your experience, then when you look at these patients that you've helped come off of this, how have you seen them transform? Like now they're fully off, They're at a 0%. They're not taking anything anymore, even if it's like a one year taper or a two year taper. What are you noticing in the weeks after you do that final dose? Speaker 1: You know, the the really cool thing is that I mean, you see them come back to life while you're doing the taper. Like a lot of the benefit is even before coming off the last dose. So many of them actually become funnier and more spontaneous. It's like you end up talking to them and you're like, oh, wow, there's this humorous streak in there. They become more motivated, they become more connected. So, I mean, emotions come back up. But we are, I mean, we also have to have a sober view of this as well. I mean, coming off psychiatric medications isn't just like a walk in the park. I mean, most people are on them for a reason. And so we're doing a lot of like hard work while they're coming off. We're working on their physical health, we're working on their diet. There are behavioral things or thought processes that have led them to make bad decisions, we have to confront them because you can't, I mean, if someone is on a blunting medication because their life is in disorder, unless you help them sort out their life, if you just remove the drug, they're still going to be suffering. And so coming off these meds is, I mean, it's always easiest when it's like someone went through a divorce like ten years ago and they've kind of recovered and their life is in order. They always look great coming off but there's a lot of people who have very real problems in their life and that really depends on how much you can help them get through those things when you're taking them off the drugs. Speaker 0: Right. Makes sense. Yeah. A trauma, childhood trauma, some sort of sexual abuse that they had to go through. Yeah. They went through as a child, awful stuff. It's not something that you can just walk away from the underlying, you know, underlying trauma there, I I I bet. What do you hope that like if someone's watching this and I hope that this goes out to millions of people. If someone's watching this thinking about coming off of it or going on SSRIs or antidepressants for the first time. What would you say to someone who's thinking about going on antidepressants for the first time? Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah. So the first thing that I would say to them is your emotions mean something. Don't let a doctor tell you that it's a chemical imbalance. You want someone to spend time with you. You want them to look at your physical health, your relationships, purpose and meaning, the substances that you're putting in your body, prescription and non prescription. How you feel matters. And so that's the first thing and you need to lean into that. Numbing that could be an enormous opportunity cost where you miss out on the chance to address something very serious and it could get worse. So that's what I would say to someone thinking about this. Be very interested in your emotions and know that they're coming from somewhere. However, if you have done everything, I mean, really, like if your health is in order, there's no medical issues going on, you're engaged in therapy, if you're still suffering, there's no harm in going to a medication. The main issue that we have right now is that people skip all of the non drug approaches and go straight to drugs. You need to do all the non drug approaches first before relying on something like a drug, which has all the problems that we've just talked about. And so that's what I would say to the person thinking about getting on. Now, to the person who wants to come off, what I would say is generally after a couple years of use, this is like, it's probably gonna be a six to eighteen month journey and you really need to listen to your body. Don't let anyone tell you you can come off in a couple of weeks, that's almost always gonna fail. You can find a doctor who knows how to taper you. A lot of people, I recommend using liquids because you can draw up your dose in a syringe, the syringe has 100 little lines on the side. You can just say, hey, every week I'm just gonna drop five of these lines and then in twenty weeks I'll be off. You could do something like that but you need to listen to your body and how you react to the reductions. Because if you start having withdrawal, just go back to the last dose, wait for it to settle down and then do a smaller reduction next time. And so the main thing in coming off is listen to your body, go slow, and don't rush. And I think, I don't know if this is Navy SEALs or Marines, but there's some saying like, it's like slow is smooth and smooth is fast. I mean, that has never been more true for coming off psychiatric medications. Doing it the right way, slowly, smoothly is almost always the fastest way. Speaker 0: Well said. Well, if people wanna get in contact with you at your tapering clinic, you take extra patients, if you're able to work with or point someone in the right direction, how can people contact you and your clinic? Speaker 1: Yeah, so we're all over the country now. I think we're in the 15 or 16 most largest US states. And so I think that's about 70% of the population. Our website is taperclinic.com. So you can go there and we have videos on our program that you can check out and see if we're a good fit for you. If you're someone listening internationally or maybe in a smaller state, I would recommend that you go and check out my YouTube channel which is Doctor. Josef, but it's the German version. So it's J O S E F and we have all sorts of videos there, very long detailed videos on how to safely do a drug taper with your doctor. Underneath all of the videos, we also have a free drug tapering training. It's about five hours long and that's like everything you would ever wanna know about coming off any psychiatric medication. It's available for free if you go through that and you use it to work with your own doctor, you're gonna be in a really good place. Speaker 0: Doctor. Youssef Duhring, thank you for all your work on this. Thank you for sharing your story. Thank you for sharing the data that you know about and hopefully trying to help people get off of these drugs. Thank you so much. Speaker 1: My pleasure. Thanks so much for having me.
Saved - December 8, 2025 at 12:38 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m highlighting atrazine, sprayed on 85 million pounds of U.S. corn, now in tap water at levels claimed to wreck hormones. The piece cites studies: chemical castration in frogs, reduced male fertility, cancer risk, birth defects, hormone chaos, brain effects, and obesity/diabetes from prenatal exposure. Europe bans it; the U.S. limit is up to 3 ppb. It urges filtering water, buying organic, and a ban.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨 ONE CHEMICAL IN YOUR WATER IS TURNING MALE FROGS INTO EGG-LAYING FEMALES—AND IT’S DOING THE SAME TO OUR BOYS. The EPA says it’s “safe.” Europe banned it 20 years ago. 🚨 ATRAZINE—85 million pounds sprayed yearly on U.S. corn—is in your tap water right now at levels PROVEN to wreck human hormones. Science doesn’t lie: Here are Atrazine’s Proven Harms – Straight from the Studies: - Chemical Castration: Turns male frogs into fertile females at 0.1 ppb; complete sex reversal & hermaphroditism (Hayes et al., PNAS 2002, 2010) - Crushes Male Fertility: Up to 50% lower sperm count, tiny testicles, infertility in men & animals (Swan et al., 2003; Fan et al., 2011) - Cancer Trigger: Probable human carcinogen—prostate, breast, ovarian, lymphoma, leukemia (IARC 2024; Pathak et al., 2022) - Birth Defects: Preterm birth, low birth weight, genital deformities, brain defects (Waller et al., 2010; Agopian et al., 2013) - Hormone Chaos: Mimics estrogen, tanks testosterone → delayed puberty & “chemical castration” (Cooper et al., 2000) - Brain Damage: Parkinson’s, cognitive decline, anxiety in farmworkers (multiple studies EPA buried) - Obesity & Diabetes: Prenatal exposure = adult obesity & insulin resistance (Frontiers in Endocrinology, 2020) Europe: 0 ppb allowed. USA: Up to 3 ppb “safe.” Your son’s future masculinity is collateral damage for cheap corn. Filter your water. Buy organic. Scream for a ban. Tag someone who drinks tap water. They need to see this. All cited research linked in replies below...

View Full Interactive Feed