reSee.it - Related Post Feed

prayingmedic
Posted - August 9, 2023 at 2:34 AM
Saved - August 12, 2023 at 12:56 PM

@prayingmedic - Praying Medic

GOP Rep Loudermilk: J6 Committee failed to preserve records, has no data on Capitol Hill security failures.

J6 Committee failed to preserve records, has no data on Capitol Hill security failures, GOP charges The GOP head of the committee investigating the security failures of January 6 says the Nancy Pelosi-created committee did not preserve the documents as it was required. foxnews.com
JDunlap1974
Posted - August 9, 2023 at 2:23 PM
Saved - August 9, 2023 at 2:39 PM

@JDunlap1974 - 🇺🇸🇺🇸Josh Dunlap🇺🇲🇺🇲 ULTRA-MAGA

J6 Committee 'Cover-Up'? House Dems Wiped Records on Security Failures, Scrubbed White House Communications....

J6 Committee 'Cover-Up' Revealed: House Dems Wiped Records On Security Failures, Scrubbed White House Communications The "J6" committee has failed to turn over numerous documents into the House record pertaining to the security failures that led to the Capitol riots. The trendingpoliticsnews.com
marklevinshow
Posted - August 9, 2023 at 11:36 PM
Saved - August 10, 2023 at 3:45 PM

@marklevinshow - Mark R. Levin

Pelosi's Jan 6 committee destroyed crucial, raw evidence and information in the greatest coverup operation in congressional history. In doing so, they violated the law, violated House rules, and violated Trump's right to have access to information that may have been useful to his defense. https://foxnews.com/politics/j6-committee-failed-to-preserve-records-has-no-data-on-capitol-hill-security-failures-gop-charges

jsolomonReports
Posted - December 1, 2023 at 1:04 AM
Saved - December 1, 2023 at 6:12 AM

@jsolomonReports - John Solomon

Watch: Rep. Loudermilk confirms all videotapes from Jan. 6 Committee depositions are gone https://justthenews.com/videos/rep-loudermilk-confirms-all-videotapes-jan-6-committee-depositions-are-gone?utm_source=mux&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=tw

Rep. Loudermilk confirms all videotapes from Jan. 6 Committee depositions are gone Representative Barry Loudermilk (R-GA) says taped depositions of January 6 star witness Cassidy Hutchinson and all other testifiers from the original January 6 Select Committee investigation are now missing. “I wrote a letter to Bennie Thompson asking for them and he confirmed that they did not preserve those tapes. He didn’t feel that they had to,” Rep. Loudermilk says. “But according to House rules, you have to preserve any data and any information and documents that are used in an official proceeding.” justthenews.com
laralogan
Posted - December 1, 2023 at 5:09 AM
Saved - December 1, 2023 at 5:39 AM

@laralogan - Lara Logan

Vanished! House panel chairman says J6 videotapes of witness interviews missing | Just The News https://justthenews.com/government/congress/vanished-house-panel-chairman-says-j6-videotapes-witness-interviews-missing

Vanished! House panel chairman says J6 videotapes of witness interviews missing Rep. Barry Loudermilk says some J6 documents missing too, and came back from Biden White House heavily redacted. justthenews.com
kylenabecker
Posted - December 1, 2023 at 2:07 PM
Saved - December 1, 2023 at 2:17 PM

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

“All of the videotapes of all depositions are gone." House Rep. Barry Loudermilk confirms that the J6 committee did not keep key evidence in its sham "investigation" of former President Donald Trump over his role in the non-insurrection on January 6 https://t.co/vAjl1mwnrC

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker confirms that the videotapes of Cassidy Hutchinson, where she changed her testimony, are missing. All the videotapes of depositions are gone, which was discovered early in the investigation. The speaker wrote a letter to Benny Thompson requesting the tapes, but they were not preserved. Despite airing portions of the tapes on televised hearings, they were not kept. The speaker believes the tapes exist somewhere and emphasizes their importance. They explain that body language and voice inflection are crucial in understanding Cassidy's original testimony and why it's necessary to have the videos.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can you confirm to us that the videotapes of Cassidy Hutchinson, the ones where she's now changing her testimony through the Arabi, that they are missing, they are gone? Speaker 1: That is true. I can confirm that and all of the videotapes of all depositions are gone. Again, we found out about this early in the investigation when I received a call, from someone who was looking for some information off one of the videotapes, and we started searching and we had none. I wrote a letter to Benny Thompson asking for them, and he confirmed that they did not preserve those tapes. He didn't feel that they had to, but according to house rules, You have to preserve any data and information and documents that are used in a proficient, An official proceeding, which they did. They actually aired portions of these tapes on their televised hearings, which means they had to keep those, But yet he chose not to. I believe they exist somewhere. We've just got to find where all these videos are. And here's why it's so important. Even with, Cassidy Hutchins, people have asked why do you need the videos? You've got written transcripts. Well, when you got someone like Cassidy who is significantly changing her testimony, I wanna see what her body language is when she gave her original testimony. I wanna see what her voice inflection is. Was she very confident In what she was saying at that time, but then later decided to change it? This is why it's so important that we have those video tapes, and I believe that's probably why we don't have them.
julie_kelly2
Posted - December 10, 2023 at 2:21 PM
Saved - December 10, 2023 at 6:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
New: Jack Smith objects to Trump's demand for evidence from DHS and J6 committee. DOJ's involvement in the missing Secret Service texts scandal raises questions. Thousands of texts were deleted, and DOJ couldn't recover them. Biden's DHS refuses to provide transcribed interviews. DOJ conceals info on undercover police and FBI informants. FISC report on abuse related to Jan 6 is discussed. Trump's case and FBI's FISA database abuse are separate issues.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

New: Last night, Jack Smith filed a motion objecting to Trump's demands for vast amounts of evidence from various agencies including DHS and J6 committee. I will post some highlights... It appears DOJ is part of the scandal of the missing Secret Service texts. As I reported a few days ago, thousands of texts between 2 dozen Secret Service officials/agents including the director and Robert Engel--the agent Trump allegedly attacked on J6 according to Cassidy Hutchinson--were deleted at the end of Jan 2021. USSS claimed the purge was caused by a pre-planned reset of devices--and it happened after House Dems notified exec branch to preserve records related to Jan 6. J6 committee subpoenaed the texts only to be told they were not recoverable. Now it looks like DOJ had actual phones but still could not find the deleted messages? This is insane--no one can possibly believe this given the invasive tools the govt has and has used in this investigation. This is in addition to Biden's DHS refusing to give House GOP numerous transcribed interviews with Secret Service officials--also apparently the one with Engel. https://declassified.live/p/more-missing-j6-committee-evidence WHAT IS THE SECRET SERVICE HIDING?

More Missing J6 Committee Evidence: Where are Secret Service Records? In addition to deleted texts belonging to two dozen top Secret Service officials, "numerous" transcribed interviews taken by the J6 committee have not been turned over to House Republicans. declassified.live

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Well, this is some stunning logic right here. Law enforcement and those officials duty-bound to secure the Capitol (Sergeant-at-arms for Pelosi and McConnell to name a few) are not to blame for what happened but Donald Trump--who is not responsible--is? https://t.co/GILCmbcqFI

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

DOJ continues to conceal info related to extensive use of undercover police from numerous agencies and deployment of FBI informants before and on Jan 6. Defendants cannot get access to this crucial evidence (see @FreeStateWill) as govt refuses to account for these assets. https://t.co/crazSgCqqB

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

In a separate thread, I will revisit FISC report on abuse related to Jan 6. Trump on the left, Smith on the right. FBI abused FISA database but Smith argues it's irrelevant to Trump's case. Mmmmkay https://t.co/sOf1vPVG4X

Kaseylynae
Posted - December 14, 2023 at 4:16 PM
Saved - December 14, 2023 at 6:21 PM

@Kaseylynae - Kasey Lynae 🇺🇸

J6 Committee Member Jamie Raskin is a Liar and a Crook!!! He violated House Rules when lying by omission about the J6 Tapes!!! HIS COMMITTEE DELETED THE DOCUMENTS! https://t.co/48LfgHVTWf

Video Transcript AI Summary
Congressman, why did the J6 committee delete their files? I have no idea. It's all in the bipartisan report by Republican Representative Liz Cheney, who chairs the Republican conference. Do you think Liz Cheney is a true Republican? Well, you tell me. You seem to be a true Republican. And what about Governor DeSantis? He was a Democrat, then a Reform Party member, and independent, but he's a con man and your boss. Thank you for your input. Are you sure you don't want to answer about the committee's handling of Donald Trump? Thank you, congressman.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Congressman, why did the j six committee delete their files? Speaker 1: I have no idea what you're talking about. Speaker 0: Oh, come on, congressman. This is, like, public knowledge. Speaker 1: You should read the report. It's all in there. A bipartisan report by Republican them as rep Liz Cheney, choose chair of the Republican conference. So what do you think about her? Speaker 0: Would you consider Liz Cheney a true Republican? Speaker 1: Well, you do tell me. You're you seem to be a true Republican. Look, don't you? You think George Santas is a true Republican? Speaker 0: I don't think so, congressman. Is it true about the head? Yeah. He definitely is. Speaker 1: Democrat, and he was a Reform Party before that and independent, but he's a con man, and he is your boss. You win the right hand. Thanks. Are you Speaker 0: sure you don't wanna answer about the committee dealing with Donald Trump? You're boss. You said Thank you, congressman.
kylenabecker
Posted - January 7, 2024 at 3:09 AM
Saved - January 8, 2024 at 12:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Donald Trump called for peace and told protesters to go home on January 6. He also stepped down after the 2020 election certification. The military was not involved in the riots, and there was no mechanism for the riot to overturn election results. Most J6 defendants were charged with non-violent crimes. No one was killed by the protesters. Trump wanted National Guard troops at the Capitol, but they were not called up. The FBI tracked extremists unconstitutionally, and there were undercover officers at the riots. Capitol Police officers were seen acting cordially with protesters. Undercover MPD officers encouraged Trump supporters to go to the Capitol. The narrative of Trump inciting a riot was set early on. The Congress was initially evacuated due to pipe bomb threats. The pipe bomber has not been apprehended. Nancy Pelosi made a comment about waiting for the riots to start. Her staff was in communication with the Secret Service. Secret Service texts from January 6 are missing. The J6 committee has buried public surveillance videos.

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

'Inconvenient Facts' about January 6: 1. Donald Trump said on January 6 to 'remain peaceful' and 'go home' within hours of the riots 2. Donald Trump said within hours of the 2020 election certification that he would step down and he did 3. The Commander-in-Chief did not use the military in any way on J6 4. The president did not send in unarmed extremists to "overturn the election" results, since there is no mechanism for a riot to overturn election results 5. The overwhelming majority of the J6 defendants were charged with non-violent crimes & misdemeanors 6. The J6 protesters did not kill a single person during the riots 7. Donald Trump wanted 10,000 National Guard troops at the Capitol, but D.C. Mayor Bowser, Pentagon & Speaker Pelosi refused to call them up 8. The FBI tracked extremists intending to go to the Capitol on J6 for months prior to the riots unconstitutionally using NSA technology 9. Court documents show there were dozens of undercover officers at the Capitol Riots, despite there being light security 10. Capitol Police officers were caught on video opening doors, removing barriers, and acting cordially with protesters inside the capitol building 11. There were undercover MPD officers caught on video encouraging Trump supporters to 'go to the capitol' 12. The narrative that Donald Trump would "incite" a riot had been set as early as May 2020, according to the infamous Time 'shadow cabal' article 13. The Transition Integrity Project wargamed out the 2020 election in the prior summer and in 3 of 4 scenarios ended in an "insurrection" 14. The Congress was evacuated originally over the RNC & DNC pipe bomb threats, not the riots 15. The pipe bomber has not been apprehended despite the FBI knowing the license plate & cell phone data of the suspect 16. Nancy Pelosi's own daughter documented her saying as the Capitol Riots started "I've been waiting for this" 17. Nancy Pelosi's staff was in communication with Secret Service on January 6 18. The Secret Service texts from January 6 have gone "missing" 19. The J6 partisan committee has buried tens of thousands of hours of public surveillance videos, including footage exonerating January 6 defendants

Lancegooden
Posted - January 11, 2024 at 1:56 PM
Saved - January 11, 2024 at 2:23 PM

@Lancegooden - Lance Gooden

This is a bombshell report. Adam Kinzinger, Liz Cheney, and the other January 6th committee members, should preserve their records. Subpoenas are coming. https://t.co/cvuI1QANRX

nypost
Posted - January 22, 2024 at 11:59 AM
Saved - January 22, 2024 at 3:53 PM

@nypost - New York Post

House Jan. 6 Committee deleted more than 100 encrypted files days before GOP took majority: sources https://trib.al/SRvJDRP

SocialFlow trib.al
susieq1007
Posted - January 22, 2024 at 12:21 PM
Saved - January 22, 2024 at 1:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Drills at the Capital today at 7am. The former House Select Committee on Jan. 6 deleted over 100 encrypted files before Republicans took over the majority. The House Administration Committee's Oversight Subcommittee is investigating the security failures and actions of the former select committee.

@susieq1007 - Susan Wood

Remember the drills today at the Capital starting at 7am… EXCLUSIVE: The former House Select Committee on Jan. 6 deleted more than 100 encrypted files from its probe just days before Republicans took over the majority in the House of Representatives, Fox News Digital has learned. The House Administration Committee’s Oversight Subcommittee is leading an investigation into Jan. 6, 2021, led by Chairman Barry Loudermilk, R-Ga. The panel is investigating the security failures on that day, as well as the “actions” of the former select committee investigating the Capitol riot. https://nypost.com/2024/01/22/news/house-jan-6-committee-deleted-more-than-100-encrypted-files-days-before-gop-took-majority-sources/

House Jan. 6 Committee deleted more than 100 encrypted files days before GOP took majority: sources EXCLUSIVE: The former House Select Committee on Jan. 6 deleted more than 100 encrypted files from its probe just days before Republicans took over the majority in the House of Representatives, Fox News Digital has learned. nypost.com
CollinRugg
Posted - January 22, 2024 at 2:32 PM
Saved - January 23, 2024 at 11:32 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The House January 6 Committee reportedly deleted over 100 encrypted files before Republicans gained the majority. Republican representative Barry Loudermilk, leading the investigation, was supposed to receive four terabytes of data but only received two. Forensic analysis revealed that 117 files were deleted and encrypted on January 1, 2023. Loudermilk criticized the committee for not archiving all records as required, mentioning specific interviews and depositions sent to the White House and Department of Homeland Security. A video shows Jacob Chansley urging protestors to go home and be respectful on January 6th.

@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg

JUST IN: The House January 6 Committee deleted 100+ encrypted files just days before Republicans gained the majority according to Fox News. Republican representative Barry Loudermilk, who is leading an investigation into the security failures of J6, was supposed to receive four terabytes of archived data. He only received two according to Fox sources. According to a forensic team, 117 files were deleted and encrypted on January 1, 2023, just days before Loudermilk was supposed to receive all files. “As you acknowledged in your July 7, 2023 letter, the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol did not archive all Committee records as required by House Rules,” Loudermilk wrote to former chair Rep. Bennie Thompson (D). “You wrote that you sent specific transcribed interviews and depositions to the White House and Department of Homeland Security but did not archive them with the Clerk of the House.” The video below shows Jacob Chansley telling protestors to “go home” and to be respectful on J6.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I asked everyone in the US government to stay peaceful and avoid violence. We are the party that values law and order, so let's respect our law enforcement. There is a video that I want you to watch.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have asked you for everyone in the US government to remain peaceful. No violence. Remember, we are the party of law and order. Respect our law enforcement. Yeah. Men and women in blue. No. No. No. Pull up the video. There's a video.
RepThomasMassie
Posted - February 6, 2024 at 2:38 AM
Saved - February 6, 2024 at 3:21 AM

@RepThomasMassie - Thomas Massie

Secret Service deleted texts from J6 and destroyed their phones AFTER being told by Congress to preserve them. Obstruction of Congress occurred under Sec Mayorkas. I asked Chair of J6 committee about this & whether he even investigated the bomb placed near VP Harris. Nothing! https://t.co/vW8lYPSFnD

Video Transcript AI Summary
During a hearing, Congressman Paul questions Chairman Thompson about the deletion of Secret Service cell phone records related to the January 6th committee investigation. Thompson confirms that the records were deleted during the Trump administration and that the committee did not have access to all the tapes. Paul expresses concern about the potential violation of the Federal Records Act and the lack of investigation into the pipe bombs found near Vice President Kamala Harris. He criticizes Secretary Mayorkas for not taking action and obstructing Congress. Thompson suggests that if Congressman Greene wants to investigate further, he should issue a subpoena. Paul concludes by expressing his disappointment with the committee's findings and the Secret Service's response to the pipe bombs.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Gentleman from Kentucky is recognized for any questions he may have. Al? Speaker 1: Thank you, Chairman Cole. Ranking member Thompson, were you chairman of the January 6th committee? Yes. And what was the purpose of that committee? Speaker 0: To look at the facts and circumstances that brought about the actions of January 6th and make recommendations as to Congress and And that it would not happen again. Speaker 1: And so it included things up to January 6th and also including the day of January 6th? Speaker 0: That's correct. Speaker 1: Is it true that the Secret Service cell phone records were deleted for that day 6th? Speaker 0: I'm not certain that all of them, we had difficulty with, getting some of them. Speaker 1: Was your investigation hindered in part by the deletion of those Secret Service text messages? Speaker 0: We could have had a better and more thorough report Yeah. We had access to all those records. Speaker 1: When did you discover those messages were deleted? Speaker 0: During the course of the investigation. Speaker 1: Who who was the, the secretary of homeland security at that time? Speaker 0: January Speaker 1: No. When you discovered the messages were deleted? Alejandro Mayorkas. Secretary Mayorkas was the secretary of Homeland Security when you found out those messages were deleted? Speaker 0: Yes, as best I can recollect. Speaker 1: Do you recollect making this statement, with Ms. Cheney, and I'll ask to submit this for the record. It's a July 20, 2022, statement by Thompson and Cheney on the United States Secret Services response to the select committee subpoena? I won't read the whole thing, but here you here, I believe you said, 4 house committees had already sought these critical records from the Department of Homeland Security before the records were apparently lost. Additionally, the procedure for preserving content prior to this purge appears to have been contrary to federal records retention requirements and may represent a possible violation of the Federal Records Act? The Select Committee is seeking additional Secret Service records as well. Every effort must be made to retrieve the lost data as well. Do you still believe there may have been a violation of the Federal Records Act? Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: And when do you think these Secret Service records were deleted? Speaker 0: They were deleted when President Trump was in office. We found out about them later. Speaker 1: So 6 here's a statement of Anthony Guglielmi, chief of communications for United States Secret Service on accusations of deleted text for DHS inspector general as unanimous consent to submit this for the record? Speaker 0: That objection, sir. Speaker 1: And I also ask unanimous consent if I forgot to do it for the Thompson Chaney statement. Speaker 0: Without objection, so ordered. Speaker 1: So here This is from the Secret Service themselves. This now I believe that, before I get into that, I believe there were 4 committees chaired by Democrats, who asked for preservation of all communications, including electronic communications, the Secret Service on January 6th? This is relevant because the Secret Service works for Homeland Security, correct? Speaker 0: They are in Homeland. Yes, Speaker 1: they're in Homeland Security. Some people may think they were Treasury, but after 911, they were transferred to Homeland Security. So here's what the Secret Service said about those records. It says that the OIG requested the communications on February 26th. After the migration was well underway, the Secret Service notified DHS OIG of the loss of certain phones' data, but confirmed to OIG that none of the text it was seeking had been lost in the migration. I think we later found out they were lost. But what he says is on February 26, the migration was underway. Didn't say it was complete, said it was underway. Now Secretary Mayorkas was confirmed on February second? So this would have been 24 days after that, that the Secret Service themselves is saying they're still in the process of migrating? Now what the Secret Service claimed is that they switched phones and phone providers and then deleted all of the old phones? But it seems according to the Secret Service that they were still in the process of doing that while secretary Mayorkas was in charge of Homeland Security, which is the umbrella over the Secret Service? So, I forgot if I asked you. Did you do you still think it appears that there may have been a violation of the Federal Records Act? Speaker 0: Well, the issue of That, with the Secret Service came up when IG was trying to get access to the record and did not tell us that he was trying to get access to the record. We found that out later in the investigation. Speaker 1: Who kept you from getting access? Speaker 0: Well, to be honest with you, a number of us wrote 4 of us signed a letter, asking for that information. But in reality, We were not afforded that opportunity to get it. But at the time we asked for it, The Trump administration was still there as president. Speaker 1: So did did secretary of mail request hold anybody accountable for the deletion of those records and those cell phone records? Speaker 0: I'm not aware of it. Speaker 1: Are you still trying to get them from Secretary Mayorkas? Speaker 0: Well, you know, our committee has disbanded. Speaker 1: So you're not interested in pursuing that any further? The fact that you said, I'm going to read your words back to you, appears to be contrary to the federal records retention requirements and may represent a possible violation of the Federal Records Act. I think if if 4 committees of Congress gave a preservation notice and the Secret Service deleted those, communications? That's obstruction of Congress. I think we should still be looking into that Regardless of when we found out about it and, frankly, regardless of who the president is. But it seems to me that Mayorkas hasn't done anything about this. And according to the Secret Service statement from 2022, It looks like they were still in the process of deleting these cell phone records when Mayorkas was secretary. I would I would hope that he would be as troubled about this as I am. Let me ask you let me tie this back. Who was who is responsible on January 6? Who was responsible for the health and well-being of the incoming Vice President? Speaker 0: Of the incoming? Incoming. Speaker 1: This would be Senator Kamala Harris at the time? She was under the protection of them. Speaker 0: Well, obviously Secret Service. Speaker 1: Correct, the Secret Service. So, where was she on January 6 while all this was going on over at the Capitol? Speaker 0: I don't know. Do you Speaker 1: know there were pipe bombs allegedly present on January 6? Speaker 0: I know there were 2 pipe bombs, 1 at the Democratic headquarters and 1 at the Republican. Speaker 1: So you're in charge of the entire investigation Now what happened on January 6 and what led up to January 6? And you don't know that the vice president was in the d the incoming vice president was in the DNC when that pipe bomb was sitting there? Speaker 0: I don't you know, we did not our investigation Was looking at the facts and circumstances. We knew that there were pipe bombs. We just I'm sure the evidence will say she was wherever she is. But, you know, I'm trying to get to your point. Speaker 1: Okay. Well, my point is, If this bomb had gone off just a few feet from her, this could have been the worst assassination since JFK. And I looked at your January 6 report, and I don't I mean, can you tell me what you wrote about this pipe bomb and the fact that she was almost blown up that day? The gentleman you not right now. Speaker 0: No. I just it's in the report In terms of the submission, it's not in the 850 page document. Speaker 1: So you guys did your committee did investigate the pipe bomb or did not investigate the pipe bomb? Speaker 0: I'm trying to figure out we're not a criminal investigation? We are, you know, we we were an oversight body Looking at the facts and circumstances. We were not a criminal body to see who laid the bomb or anything like that. Speaker 1: Okay, I'll give you that. But here's it seems like a lot of criminal indictments came out of your, the result of your investigation? But here's my concern. So we unearthed a video, I don't know if you've seen it, when that second pipe bomb is found. And the Secret Service it's a videotape of the DNC. And, a person who doesn't have a uniform on, we're told it's Capitol Hill police officer, found that bomb, Walked over to, incoming vice president Kamala Harris's detail, told them there was a pipe bomb. Now I believe that to be true because I've since talked to the Capitol Police and talked to one of the people on the scene that day. He went over they went over and told the Secret Service detail there was a pipe bomb there. On this video, about 4 minutes elapsed before the Secret Service response? This is why I'm interested. I know you were very interested at one point in the deletion of these Secret Service text messages, but this is why I am interested, and I would have thought the January 6 Committee would have been interested in the 2 most threatening weapons that were present on January 6th that day? But what happens is a police officer without a uniform on, but must have been known as a police officer to the Secret Service, tells the Secret Service, there's a bomb over here. It takes them 4 minutes for the Secret Service to respond. It takes them 10 minutes to evacuate Kamala Harris, and this bomb is maybe 15 feet from the building that she's in. And this is why I wonder if you're still the least, you know, a bit curious about why Secretary Mayorkas has not followed up on the deletion of all these Secret Service texts. Does it does it bother you that they deleted them? Speaker 0: Well, it bothers me that we did not have access to all the tapes, but it also It is within the purview of the OIG. They they and we don't have any, say so As to what they do until they finish their report. To my knowledge, they have not completed that report. Speaker 1: Well, there were 4 committees, as you told us here, that requested preservation of those Secret Service communications? And they specifically said, including electronic communications. And then the Secret Service proceeds to migrate the phones to a different carrier and destroy the phones that were in their possession? Part of this migration at least part of this migration happened while secretary Mayorkas was in charge of the the DHS, which is what the Secret Service is part of and reports to? This is concerning to me. I don't know if I would have drafted the same articles of impeachment that we see here today. I think if you gave 4 35 people of the job, you get 435 answers. But one of the things that concerns me greatly is here we had on January 6, what we are being told are by the FBI and ATF viable bombs within just feet of the incoming vice president, 1st African American female vice president in the history of this country is is within feet of a bomb, a viable bomb for over an hour. The Secret Service takes forever to respond to it. And here we have Secretary Mayorkas, who was over all of this, not on that day, but I'm not as concerned about that day as I am now about the information we can't get And the information that he hasn't tried to get, as far as I can tell, it might, and I've spoken to the OIG Because they just did they didn't just delete the electronics, they destroyed the phones. This is concerning to me. I believe there, I believe you were correct when you made this joint statement with Ms. Cheney saying that there was a possible violation of Federal Records Act? And when there is a possible violation of the Federal Records Act, in in response to and in contravention of a preservation act from Congress, which is trying to investigate this very serious event. I think it's the most serious but least investigated event of January 6th. The fight the fact that there was a pipe bomb just feet From the vice president and the Secret Service, they didn't find it when they swept the area, apparently, and they didn't respond to it for for minutes after they heard it was there? But I am concerned that secretary Mayorkas is either through acts of commission or omission involved in this obstruction of Congress? You said it was a possible violation of the Federal Records Act. I agree with you. I think it is a violation of the Federal Records Act. I don't think we've had such a clear cut case, and I don't think we've had such a clear cut case of obstruction. So I think, we owe it to the people to get to the bottom of this. Secretary Mayorkas is no help. He's still stymieing the OIG, still claiming that there's no way that you could get these records, these communications. And I think it's a it's a very serious charge, and I would I would have included it, frankly, myself. We we sit here and we ask these questions in these hearings, and they say, oh, congressman, that's the subject of an ongoing investigation. We cannot answer your question. But if the when they say that to the OIG, we have another problem. These are the people that are set up to oversee what we're supposed to not be privy to, although I would argue that we should be able to get that too. And I believe that your committee and the other committees of which there were 4 who asked for these records were within their rights and obligations to to the American people to get those Secret Service cell phone texts, but they apparently don't exist anymore. And they disappeared when? When Mayorkas was secretary of Department of Homeland Security? I've got a real problem with that. Do you wanna say anything before I conclude, mister Thompson? Speaker 0: Well, I put it to you like that. Taylor Greene has subpoena power, with our committee. If he wants to look into that, I'll support it. Speaker 1: Are you concerned about the lackadaisical attitude of the secret or maybe you haven't seen the video. Have you seen the video of the discovery of the second pipe bomb? Speaker 0: No. No. Let me just say, A lot of what you said here today, I have not been privy to. But I am of the opinion that if The chairman wants to look into that. You convince him to issue the subpoena. I'll go with him. Speaker 1: I would like to show you that video at some point. I'm surprised your committee did not find it. I mean, there were 2 bombs that day. And according to FBI and ATF and and Capitol Police? They were operable, viable bombs. One of them was just feet from Kamala Harris, who was going to become the The vice president of the United States and the Secret Service sat there in their patrol car. It looks to me like they finished eating their lunch before they got out to look at it? And then it was 10 minutes. This is all on video. 10 minutes before they got Kamala Harris out of there. And again, it is secretary Mayorkas who oversaw the production of these documents, These these texts, which were never produced, and that's a real problem for me. With that, I yield back. Speaker 0: Thank you.
KimWexlerMAJD
Posted - July 17, 2024 at 3:46 PM
Saved - July 17, 2024 at 10:43 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Secret Service cell phone records for January 6 were deleted, and Secretary Mayorkas was in charge at the time. The deletion may have violated the Federal Records Act, and accountability should be investigated. Kimberly Cheatle, who is connected to the Cheneys and Bidens, was named director of the Secret Service and her involvement in the deleted texts raises questions about her trustworthiness. Her transcribed interview with the J6 committee has not been made public, and it's unclear if other interviews are being withheld from Congress.

@KimWexlerMAJD - Kim “filterless” Wexler MA JD

MASSIE: Secret Service cell phone records were deleted for January 6? Who was Secretary of Homeland Security when you discovered the records were deleted? THOMPSON: Alejandro Mayorkas. MASSIE: Do you still believe there may have been a violation of the Federal Records Act? THOMPSON: Yes.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The committee investigated the deletion of Secret Service records related to January 6th. The Secret Service claimed they were still in the process of migrating data when Mayorkas was in charge. The committee believes there may have been a violation of the Federal Records Act. Mayorkas has not held anyone accountable, and the committee is no longer pursuing the issue. They feel it is obstruction of Congress and hope Mayorkas takes action.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ranking Member Thompson, were you chairman of the January 6th Committee? Yes. And what what was the purpose of that committee? Speaker 1: To look at the facts and circumstances that brought about, the actions of January 6th and make recommendations as to Congress and and that it would not happen again. Speaker 0: And so thing it included things up to January 6th and and also including the day of January 6th? Speaker 1: Mhmm. That's correct. Speaker 0: Is it true that the Secret Service cell phone records were deleted for that day on January 6th? Speaker 1: I'm not certain that all of them. We had difficulty with, getting some of them. Speaker 0: Was your investigation hindered in part by the deletion of those Secret Service text messages? Speaker 1: We could have had a a better and more thorough, report had we had access to all those records. Speaker 0: When did you discover those messages were deleted? Speaker 1: During the course of the investigation. Speaker 0: Who who was the, the secretary of homeland security at that time? Speaker 1: January Speaker 0: No. When you discovered the messages were deleted. Speaker 1: Alejandro Mayorkas. Speaker 0: Secretary Mayorkas was the secretary of Homeland Security when you found out those messages were deleted? Speaker 1: Yes. As as best I can recollect. Speaker 0: Do you do you recollect making this statement, with miss Cheney? And I'll ask to submit this for the record. It's a July 20, 2022 statement by Thompson and Cheney on the United States Secret Services' response to the select committee subpoena. I won't read the whole thing, but here you here, I believe you said, 4 house committees had already sought these critical records from the Department of Homeland Security before the records were apparently lost. Additionally, the procedure for preserving content prior to this purge appears to have been contrary to federal records retention requirements and may represent a possible violation of the Federal Records Act. The select committee is seeking additional Secret Service records as well. Every effort must be made to retrieve the lost data as well. Do you still believe there may have been a violation of the Federal Records Act? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: And when do you think these Secret Service records were deleted? Speaker 1: They were deleted when President Trump was in office. We found out about him Speaker 0: later. So, what here's a statement of Anthony Guglielmi, chief of communications for United States Secret Service, on accusations of deleted text for DHS inspector general. I asked you may have unanimous consent to submit this for the record. That objection's And I also ask unanimous consent if I forgot to do it for the Thompson Chaney statement. That objection's ordered. So here this is from the Secret Service themselves. This now I I believe that, before I get into that, I believe there were 4 committees chaired by Democrats who asked for preservation of all communications, including electronic communications, the Secret Service on January 6th. This this is relevant because the Secret Service works for Homeland Security. Correct? Speaker 1: They're in the Homeland. Speaker 0: Yeah. They're in Homeland Security. Some people may think they're in Treasury, but after 9 11, they were transferred to Homeland Security. So here's what the Secret Service said about those records. It says that the OIG requested the communications on February 26th. After the migration was well underway, the Secret Service notified DHS OIG of the loss of certain phones' data, but confirmed to OIG that none of the texts it was seeking had been lost in the migration. I think we later found out they were lost. But what he says is on February 26th, the migration was underway. Didn't say it was complete, said it was underway. Now, Secretary Mayorkas was confirmed on February 2nd. So this would have been 24 days after that, that the Secret Service themselves is saying they're still in the process of migrating. Now what the Secret Service claimed is that they switched phones and phone providers and then deleted all of the old phones. But it it seems, according to the Secret Service, that they were still in the process of doing that while secretary Mayorkas was in charge of Homeland Security, which is the umbrella over the Secret Service. So, I forgot if I asked you. Did you do you still think it appears that there may have been a violation of the Federal Records Act? Speaker 1: Well, the issue of that, with the Secret Service came up when IG was trying to get access to the record and did not tell us that he was trying to get access to the record. We found that out later in the investigation. Speaker 0: Who who kept you from getting access? Speaker 1: Well, to be honest with you, a number of us wrote let 4 of us signed a letter, asking for that information. But in reality, we were not afforded that opportunity to get it. But at the time we asked for it, the Trump administration was still there as president. Speaker 0: So did did secretary Mayorkas hold anybody accountable for the deletion of those records and those cell phone records? Speaker 1: I'm not aware of it. Speaker 0: Are you still trying to get them from secretary Mayorkas? Speaker 1: Well, you know, our committee has disbanded. Speaker 0: So you're you're not interested in that in pursuing that any further? The fact that you said, I'm gonna read your words back to you, appears to be contrary to the federal records retention requirements and may represent a possible violation of the Federal Records Act. I think if if 4 committees of Congress gave a preservation notice and the Secret Service deleted those, communications, that's obstruction of Congress. I think we should still be looking into that regardless of when we found out about it and, frankly, regardless of who the president is. But it seems to me that Mayorkas hasn't done anything about this. And according to the Secret Service statement from 2022, It looks like they were still in the process of deleting these cell phone records when Mayorkas was secretary. I would I would hope that he would be as troubled about this as I am.

@KimWexlerMAJD - Kim “filterless” Wexler MA JD

Thomas Massie Grills J6 Committee Chair Over Pipe Bomb Investigation, Secret Service Scrubbing Phones “Did Secretary Mayorkas hold anybody accountable for the deletion of the cell phone records? We should be looking into obstruction of Congress.” 6FEB24 https://dailycaller.com/2024/02/06/thomas-massie-bennie-thompson-jan-6/

Thomas Massie Grills J6 Committee Chair Over Pipe Bomb Investigation, Secret Service Scrubbing Phones Rep. Thomas Massie grilled the January 6 Committee Chair Bennie Thompson over the pipe bomb investigation and allegations Secret Service destroyed cellphones. dailycaller.com

@KimWexlerMAJD - Kim “filterless” Wexler MA JD

Was the directorship of the Secret Service Kimberly Cheatle’s reward for the destruction of the agency’s cell phones and data related to January 6? 🤷🏼‍♀️

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

More on the deleted Secret Service texts related to J6. Kim Cheatle was a Secret Service honcho on J6—asst director of Office of Protective Operations. She’s tied to both the Cheneys and Bidens. Joe Biden named her director of Secret Service last year. Here’s what she said about the deleted texts. Does she seem trustworthy? Also, her transcribed interview with J6 committee has never been made public. It’s unclear whether her interview is one of several that DHS (which houses Secret Service) is withholding from Congress. Hard to think, given her position on J6 and her appearance in J6-related emails, her texts aren’t missing too.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A 28-year veteran who was involved in evacuating Vice President Dick Cheney on 9/11 and served on Vice President Biden's protective detail was appointed director in 2022 amid controversy over the agency deleting text messages from January 6th. The agency claims it was due to a data migration, but many find it suspicious given the timing and volume of messages deleted. The agency insists there was no wrongdoing and emphasizes the importance of integrity.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: She would know. The 28 year veteran was on the team that evacuated vice president Dick Cheney on 911, and she served on then vice president Biden's protective detail. He named her director in mid 2022. Do it. Amid a swirl of controversy over the agency deleting nearly all of its text messages from January 6th. The agency says that was due to a data migration. System migrations happen. But I think for a lot of Americans, it just doesn't pass the smell test given the timing and the volume of messages deleted. Speaker 1: Well, it's unfortunate that that would be the assumption that people would make. Our integrity is everything, and there was nothing nefarious attached to that. Speaker 0: Their integrity has
JoshWalkos
Posted - July 28, 2024 at 4:48 PM
Saved - July 30, 2024 at 1:48 PM

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Listen to now former Secret Service Director address the fact that all of the text messages sent by the SS on January 6th were deleted due to a “data migration”. This is how much contempt these people have for the American people. https://t.co/xigeURsFeq

Video Transcript AI Summary
Secret service director Kim Cheadle advocates for a replica White House for training. They visited Tyler Perry's studios for research. Despite past controversies, Cheadle emphasizes integrity and strict misconduct policies. Recruitment and retention challenges are addressed by aiming for more female recruits. The service prepares for the 2024 campaign season, including protecting former President Trump. The mission remains zero fail, with officers training diligently.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Secret service director Kim Cheadle agrees. Speaker 1: 1 of your predecessors said training without a White House replica is like training for a basketball game without hoops. Absolutely. Speaker 2: I I think you wouldn't ask, your your Super Bowl champs to go out and train in a parking lot. Speaker 0: That's why she wants Congress to fund a replica White House for training. Speaker 1: Your team has gone to an unusual place as part of the research on how to build a mock White House. I'm thinking about a Hollywood related place. Speaker 0: They visited Tyler Perry's production studios in Atlanta, which has a replica White House. Speaker 2: He was gracious enough to allow us to take a tour of it. Speaker 1: Did it feel like the White House? Speaker 2: It did. Speaker 0: She would know. The 28 year veteran was on the team that evacuated vice president Dick Cheney on 911, and she served on then vice president Biden's protective detail. He named her director in mid 2022. USA. Amid a swirl of controversy over the agency deleting nearly all of its text messages from January 6th, the agency says that was due to a data migration. Speaker 1: System migrations happen. But I think for a lot of Americans, it just doesn't pass the smell test given the timing and the volume of messages deleted. Speaker 2: Well, it's unfortunate that that would be the assumption that people would make. Our integrity is everything, and there was nothing nefarious attached to that. Speaker 0: Their integrity has been put to the test, not only by the mishap at the National Security Advisor's Home, but by misconduct over the years, including off duty agents hiring sex workers in Colombia before an Obama trip, and a drunken altercation in South Korea last year. Speaker 2: We've implemented a number of things previous to to me becoming a director and then, continuing as I've been the director. I've made sure that the workforce knows that misconduct won't be tolerated. We ensure that there's a a full investigation that's taken place whenever there is an allegation. If we need to put a person on admin leave or, revoke their security clearance, we're we'll do that. Speaker 0: Another challenge, recruitment and retention, something all law enforcement is struggling with. But the secret services departure rate was 48% last year, due in parts to the high demands of the job. To expand hiring, they're aiming to have 30% women recruits by 2030, and even allowed YouTube influencer, Michelle Khare, to train with ages. Speaker 2: But I'm very conscious, as, as I sit in this chair now of making sure that we need to, attract diverse candidates and ensure that we are developing and giving opportunities to everybody in our workforce, and particularly women. Speaker 0: That workforce will be pivotal for the 2024 campaign season, which for the first time includes a former president who already has lifetime protection. President Trump. Agents were there when Donald Trump was arraigned in New York. Speaker 2: We were able to work out the details ahead of time of how that, particular, day was gonna go, but we will always ensure the safety of all of our protectees that we have. Speaker 0: The service has a zero fail mission. A mission officers are training to uphold, pretending this field is the most famous address in America. For CBS Mornings, I'm Adriana Diaz in Laurel
julie_kelly2
Posted - August 2, 2024 at 4:26 PM
Saved - August 3, 2024 at 5:56 AM

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

NEW: DHS IG confirms in report that the Biden/Mayorkas DHS significantly stonewalled his J6 investigation. Texts deleted, cell phones of top officials presumably including Kim Cheatle were wiped. Data never recovered https://t.co/AzCaiTRgeg

julie_kelly2
Posted - August 2, 2024 at 4:40 PM
Saved - August 3, 2024 at 8:26 AM

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Rep. Massie suggests the deletions--made between Feb and April 2021 under Sec Mayorkas--represented criminal obstruction of Congress since Democrats had sent preservation notices to all agencies prior to the alleged "device migration" process. Thompson again seems unconcerned

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Secret Service confirmed that they were still migrating data when Secretary Mayorkas was in charge. The IG faced obstacles accessing records, with concerns raised about potential violations of the Federal Records Act. Accountability for deleted records was not addressed, despite congressional inquiries. The issue of obstruction of Congress was raised, but no further action was taken. Mayorkas has not addressed the situation, despite ongoing concerns.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So here's what the Secret Service said about those records. It says that the OIG requested the communications on February 26th After the migration was well underway, the Secret Service notified DHS OIG of the loss of certain phones' data, but confirmed to OIG that none of the texts it was seeking had been lost in the migration. I think we later found out they were lost, but what he says is on February 26th, the migration was underway. Didn't say it was complete, said it was underway. Now secretary Mayorkas was confirmed on February 2nd. So this would have been 24 days after that that the Secret Service themselves is saying they're still in the process of migrating. Now what the Secret Service claimed is that they switched phones and phone providers and then deleted all of the old phones. But it it seems, according to the Secret Service, that they were still in the process of doing that while secretary Mayorkas was in charge of Homeland Security, which is the umbrella over the Secret Service. So, I forgot if I asked you. Did you do you still think it appears that there may have been a violation of the Federal Records Act? Speaker 1: Well, the issue of that, with the Secret Service came up when the IG was trying to get access to the record and did not tell us that he was trying to get access to the record. We found that out later in the investigation. Speaker 0: Who who kept you from getting access? Speaker 1: Well, to be honest with you, a number of us wrote 4 of us signed a letter, asking for that information. But in reality, we were not afforded that opportunity to get it. But at the time we asked for it, the Trump administration was still there as president. Speaker 0: So did did secretary of mail request hold anybody accountable for the deletion of those records and those cell phone records? Speaker 1: I'm not aware of it. Are you still trying Speaker 0: to get them from secretary Mayorkas? Speaker 1: Well, you know, our committee has disbanded. Speaker 0: So you're you're not interested in that in pursuing that any further? The fact that you said, I'm gonna read your words back to you, appears to be contrary to the Federal records retention requirements and may represent a possible violation of the Federal Records Act. I think if if 4 committees of Congress gave a preservation notice and the Secret Service deleted those, communications, that's obstruction of Congress. I think we should still be looking into that regardless of when we found out about it and, frankly, regardless of who the president is. But it seems to me that Mayorkas hasn't done anything about this. And according to the Secret Service statement from 2022, It looks like they were still in the process of deleting these cell phone records when Mayorkas was secretary. I would I would hope that he would be as troubled about this as I am.
julie_kelly2
Posted - August 20, 2024 at 2:46 PM
Saved - August 20, 2024 at 3:50 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Records indicate that the Secret Service obstructed the internal investigation into deleted text messages from January 6 and attempted to withhold documents from Inspector General Joseph Cuffari. Additionally, top DHS officials requested that the IG report be nearly fully redacted before public release and sought partial redactions for Congress. Notably, DHS aimed to involve Biden's White House general counsel in the final report review, which raises concerns about the independence of the inspector general process. Jonathan Meyer, the general counsel, has longstanding ties to Biden.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

NEW: Records appear to confirm the Secret Service thwarted the internal investigation into the deleted text messages of several USSS officials from Jan 6 and also attempted to withhold documents from IG Joseph Cuffari. Top DHS officials then demanded that the IG report be fully redacted with the exception of the report's title before being released to the public. DHS also wanted partial redactions in the report sent to Congress. Further--records also show that DHS wanted Biden's WH general counsel involved in reviewing the final report. This appears to be highly unusual in the inspector general process, which is supposed to be independent from outside influence. The general counsel for DHS is longtime Biden crony Jonathan Meyer. He worked for Biden in the Senate then the Obama DOJ and DHS.

julie_kelly2
Posted - September 25, 2024 at 4:34 PM
Saved - September 26, 2024 at 12:14 PM

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

NEW: Rep Massie confirms the FBI does not have footage captured by DNC security cameras for January 6, 2021. This is the new DNC server scandal. How is this possible? https://t.co/VT1PciIJwn

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the FBI's "failed investigation" of the January 6th pipe bomb, alleging the FBI has no leads or suspects, has lost information and evidence, and that the Secret Service deleted all texts from January 6th. The speaker claims Steve D'Antuono said cell phone data that could have been used to find the bomber was corrupted. The speaker states that the FBI does not have video footage of the DNC from January 6th. The speaker asks if confidential human sources were involved in the pipe bomb incident. The other speaker responded they would have to refresh themselves on the information gathered to date. The speaker suggests getting the information public before the election.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've got a failed FBI's failed investigation of the January 6th pipe bomb. Are you looking into that at all? Speaker 1: We've had discussion. I know congressman about it, and we have followed up, and I can speak to you about that. Speaker 0: I I mean, they keep saying it's ongoing investigation, but they've got no leads, no suspects. They've lost information. They've lost evidence. They can't find evidence. Secret Service deleted all of its texts on January 6th. Steve D'Antuono, the guy in charge of Washington DC field office says that the cell phone data that would could have been used to find the bomber was corrupted. And now we just found out, I found out from an from another inspector general, and I I wanna submit this for the record. Objection. Yeah. He I asked him, do you have the footage, the video footage? Does the FBI have the video footage of the DNC on January 6th? And he tells me when he asked the FBI for the video footage, they don't even have video footage of the DNC that we know was created on January 6th. It's almost I mean, so it's almost as if they don't want to know. Can you rule out that there were any confidential human sources involved in the whole pipe bomb thing on January 6th? Speaker 1: I'm not I'd have to go back Congressman and refresh myself on what we've information we've gathered to date on that. I don't know as I sit here. Okay. Speaker 0: That would be a huge revelation. I'm happy to come I think we should get that and get it public before the election. I yield back.
julie_kelly2
Posted - December 22, 2024 at 4:09 PM
Saved - December 23, 2024 at 4:40 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read the transcript of the Secret Service driver from January 6, 2021, released by Rep. Loudermilk. The driver wanted to testify right after the events, but the J6 committee delayed the interview until just before the 2022 election. He confirmed that under Biden, the Secret Service ordered agents to wipe their phones, violating federal records law, especially since Congress was investigating the events. The driver also directly refuted Cassidy Hutchinson's claims about an alleged assault by Trump, which no one, including Liz Cheney, planned to address during questioning.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Reading transcript of Secret Service driver of the presidential vehicle on Jan 6, 2021 released last week by @RepLoudermilk As reported earlier, the driver wanted to testify to the J6 committee immediately following what we now know is perjured testimony by Cassidy Hutchinson. J6 committee waited until the day before the 2022 election--one in which Republicans were predicted to win back the House--to interview the driver. The driver's atty noted the committee's months-long resistance to conducting the interview.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

The driver confirms what I have been reporting since 2021: the Secret Service under Joe Biden ordered agents to wipe their cell phones. This included messages from before, on, and after Jan 6. This is in violation of federal records law and represents another federal crime since the events of Jan 6 were under investigation by Congress. Every agency received a preservation letter by Democratic-led House committees BEFORE the phones were wiped. The texts were never recovered. House GOP should subpoena every cell phone provider for the records including official and personal cell phones of USSS officials involved in the deletion of records such as the then acting director and Kim Cheatle, a top USSS official on Jan 6.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

During committee questioning of the limo driver, it became clear no one--including Liz Cheney=-planned to ask about the alleged assault by Pres Trump. So the driver's lawyer (Zach Terwilliger) had to bring it up himself. The driver DIRECTLY REFUTED Cassidy Hutchinson's claims https://t.co/nfPuY9fb7i

BehizyTweets
Posted - January 2, 2025 at 5:42 PM
Saved - January 2, 2025 at 10:25 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Congress has revealed significant findings regarding the January 6th pipe bomb investigation, alleging a coverup by the FBI. Despite identifying multiple persons of interest early on, the FBI has made no arrests, raising questions about their investigative efforts. The committee highlighted major law enforcement failures, including inadequate security measures and misinformation that endangered public safety. Additionally, new footage of a police officer carrying a bag into the DNC Headquarters shortly before the bombs were found has emerged, prompting further scrutiny.

@BehizyTweets - George

BREAKING: Congress just released BOMBSHELL findings on the January 6th pipe bomb investigation, revealing that the FBI engaged in a massive coverup. The Committee determined that "There is conflicting information as to whether the FBI received “corrupted” cellular data from the major cell carriers. A former senior FBI official testified that the major cell carrier companies provided “corrupted” cell data to the FBI and suggested that that “corrupted” data may have contained the identity of the pipe bomber; however, in responses to letters from the Subcommittee, the major cell carriers confirmed that they did not provide corrupted data to the FBI and that the FBI never notified them of any issues with accessing the cellular data." "After more than 1,400 days since two pipe bombs were placed on Capitol Hill, the FBI has made no arrest and has charged no individuals with planting the explosive devices. Since its initial progress in the early weeks and months of the investigation, there has been little meaningful progress toward the apprehension of the suspect." Do you mean to tell me they were able to track down & arrest hundreds of J6ers mere days after January 6th but still can't get their hands on the actual terrorist who endangered the entire government? Yeah, we're not buying what they're selling. EVERYONE AT THE FBI MUST GET ARRESTED.

@BehizyTweets - George

According to the committee, the FBI identified multiple persons of interest during the initial weeks and months of the investigation, yet somehow still "failed" to identify the suspect. They also "refused to provide the Subcommittees with additional information about these investigative leads."

@BehizyTweets - George

Additionally, they found major law enforcement "failures" surrounding the incident: - Failed to identify one of the devices during security sweeps at the DNC; - Failed to properly secure and maintain a perimeter around the pipe bombs despite multiple orders to do so, allowing pedestrians and vehicular traffic to cross within feet of the explosive devices; - Allowed the motorcade of the Speaker of the House of Representatives to drive through an active bomb scene, risking the safety of the Speaker; - Allowed commuter trains to continue crossing a bridge next to the DNC, placing civilians within close proximity to one of the viable devices; and - Transmitted inaccurate information over USCP radio channels, resulting in civilians and law enforcement units breaching the security perimeter No one with a functioning brain believes that many failures can happen simultaneously.

@BehizyTweets - George

Suddenly, this footage of a cop carrying a bag into the D.C. DNC Headquarters 15 minutes before the pipe bombs were discovered is super relevant now. https://t.co/KZLQdUABSw

JohnStrandUSA
Posted - January 3, 2025 at 12:51 AM
Saved - January 3, 2025 at 3:46 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

👀 J6 SCANDAL Massie: USSS phone records were deleted for J6? Who was Secretary of DHS when you discovered this? Thompson: Alejandro Mayorkas. Massie: Do you still believe there may have been a violation of the Federal Records Act? Thompson: Yes. https://t.co/uCX4UgfZ5B

Video Transcript AI Summary
The January 6th Committee aimed to investigate the events leading up to and on January 6th, making recommendations to prevent future occurrences. There were issues accessing Secret Service cell phone records, which were reportedly deleted, hindering a thorough investigation. The deletion was discovered during the investigation, and Alejandro Mayorkas was the Secretary of Homeland Security at that time. The committee believes there may have been a violation of the Federal Records Act, as four congressional committees had previously sought these records. The Secret Service claimed data loss occurred during a phone migration process. Accountability for the deletion remains unclear, and the committee has since disbanded, leaving further pursuit of the records uncertain. Concerns about potential obstruction of Congress were raised regarding the deletion of communications despite preservation notices.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ranking Member Thompson, were you chairman of the January 6th Committee? Yes. And what what was the purpose of that committee? Speaker 1: To look at the facts and circumstances that brought about, the actions of January 6th and make recommendations as to Congress and and that it would not happen again. Speaker 0: And so it included things up to January 6th and and also including the day of January 6th. Mhmm. Speaker 1: That's correct. Speaker 0: Is it true that the Secret Service cell phone records were deleted for that day on January 6th? Speaker 1: I'm not certain that all of them. We had difficulty with, getting some of them. Speaker 0: Was your investigation hindered in part by the deletion of those Secret Service text messages? Speaker 1: We could have had a a better and more thorough, report had we had access to all those records. Speaker 0: When did you discover those messages were deleted? Speaker 1: During the course of the investigation. Speaker 0: Who who was the, the secretary of homeland security at that time? Speaker 1: January. Speaker 0: No. When you discovered the messages were deleted. Speaker 1: Alejandro Mayorkas. Speaker 0: Secretary Mayorkas was the secretary of Homeland Security when you found out those messages were deleted? Speaker 1: Yes. As as best I can recollect. Speaker 0: Do you do you recollect making this statement, with miss Cheney? And I'll ask to submit this for the record. It's a July 20, 2022 statement by Thompson and Cheney on the United States Secret Services response to the select committee subpoena. I won't read the whole thing, but here you here, I believe you said, 4 house committees had already sought these critical records from the Department of Homeland Security before the records were apparently lost. Additionally, the procedure for preserving content prior to this purge appears to have been contrary to federal records retention requirements and may represent a possible violation of the Federal Records Act. The select committee is seeking additional Secret Service records as well. Every effort must be made to retrieve the lost data as well. Do you still believe there may have been a violation of the Federal Records Act? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: And when do you think these Secret Service records were deleted? Speaker 1: They were deleted when president Trump was in office. We found out about them Speaker 0: later. So, what here's a statement of Anthony, Guglielmi, chief of communications for United States Secret Service, on accusations A deleted text for DHS inspector general asked you may have unanimous consent to submit this for the record. That objection, sir. And I also asked unanimous consent, if I forgot to do it, for the Thompson Chaney statement. Without objection, so ordered. So here this is from the Secret Service themselves. This now I I believe that, before I get into that, I believe there were 4 committees chaired by Democrats who asked for preservation of all communications, including electronic communications, the Secret Service on January 6th. This this is relevant because the Secret Service works for Homeland Security. Correct? Speaker 1: They're in the Homeland. Yeah. Speaker 0: They're in Homeland Security. Some people may think they're in Treasury, but after 9 11, they were transferred to Homeland Security. So here's what the Secret Service said about those records. It says that the OIG requested the communications on February 26th After the migration was well underway, the Secret Service notified DHS OIG of the loss of certain phones' data, but confirmed to OIG that none of the texts it was seeking had been lost in the migration. I think we later found out they were lost. But what he says is on February 26th, the migration was underway. Didn't say it was complete, said it was underway. Now secretary Mayorkas was confirmed on February second. So this would have been 24 days after that that the Secret Service themselves is saying they're still in the process of migrating. Now what the Secret Service claimed is that they switched phones and phone providers and then deleted all of the old phones. But it it seems, according to the Secret Service, that they were still in the process of doing that while secretary Mayorkas was in charge of Homeland Security, which is the umbrella over the Secret Service. So, I forgot if I asked you. Did you, do you still think it appears that there may have been a violation of the Federal Records Act? Speaker 1: Well, the issue of that, with the Secret Service came up when the IG was trying to get access to the record and did not tell us that he was trying to get access to the record. We found that out later in the investigation. Speaker 0: Who who kept you from getting access? Speaker 1: Well, to be honest with you, a number of us wrote let 4 of us signed a letter, asking for that information. But in reality, we were not afforded that opportunity to get it. But at the time we asked for it, the Trump administration was still there as president. Speaker 0: So did did secretary of Miracles hold anybody accountable for the deletion of those records and those cell phone records? Speaker 1: I'm not aware of it. Speaker 0: Are you still trying to get them from secretary Mayorkas? Speaker 1: Well, you know, our committee has disbanded. Speaker 0: So you're you're not interested in that in pursuing that any further. The fact that you said, I'm gonna read your words back to you, appears to be contrary to the federal records retention requirements and may represent a possible violation of the Federal Records Act. I think if if 4 committees of congress gave a preservation notice and the Secret Service deleted those, communications, that's obstruction of congress. I think we should still be looking into that regardless of when we found out about it and, frankly, regardless of who the president is. But it seems to me that Mayorkas hasn't done anything about this. And according to the Secret Service statement from 2022, it looks like they were still in the process of deleting these cell phone records when Mayorkas was secretary. I would I would hope that he would be as troubled about this as I am.
libsoftiktok
Posted - February 13, 2025 at 6:41 PM
Saved - February 13, 2025 at 9:07 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just learned that FEMA is facing accusations of illegally deleting records and wiping chats, including an LGBT employee chat, around the time Trump took office. A watchdog group claims this could be a violation of federal record-keeping laws.

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

BREAKING: FEMA accused of illegally deleting records & wiping chats! A watchdog group alleges FEMA erased an LGBT employee chat as Trump took office, possibly violating federal record-keeping laws. https://t.co/LBzlCZYhr9

kylenabecker
Posted - April 21, 2025 at 6:41 PM
Saved - April 21, 2025 at 10:18 PM

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

BREAKING: Senator Ron Johnson reveals Feds are DESTROYING Epstein files, 9/11 files, Covid records and more! Where is Attorney General Pam Bondi!? https://t.co/wpmXVq55Rs

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are thousands of recordings, unlike the single Zapruder film. Information is gathered from various sources and cross-referenced. If a communication is received from a non-government party but not from within the government, it suggests a cover-up or destroyed evidence. Despite the difficulty of destroying electronic evidence, it is still happening. The lack of response to a subpoena for Tom Shimabukuro indicates he destroyed evidence. Letters of preservation were repeatedly sent to agencies, instructing them not to destroy evidence.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have thousands of recordings versus one Zapruder film. It's not just December that has a record of Email communications for example. So, I mean, the the Doctor Moran's Email. We didn't get that from the agencies. We got that from a university that Email was sent to. So, there's a lot of people, you know, we we gather information from all kinds of different sources and we cross reference you know, when we're asking for certain communications, If we get it from one party outside the government and we don't get it from people within the government, that's how we evident have evidence that they're covering something up where they've already already tried to destroy evidence. But, again, in today's electronic world, it's hard to destroy, particularly electronic evidence. But they're still doing it. But you are able to find cases of them doing it. Yeah. Well, again, my guess is they are. And, again, the fact that there's nothing responsive to our subpoena with Tom Shimabukuro indicates that yes, he absolutely destroyed evidence. So we had sent letters of, you know, preservation record letters to repeatedly to the agencies not to destroy this evidence.
View Full Interactive Feed