reSee.it - Related Post Feed

thatsprettyraw
Posted - April 6, 2023 at 8:28 PM
Saved - December 13, 2023 at 12:11 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The decline in fertility worldwide is alarming. Chemicals known as endocrine disruptors are to blame. To improve fertility, focus on the kitchen and bathroom. Avoid plastics, nonstick pans, and personal care products with harmful chemicals. Replace with glass, ceramics, cast iron, stainless steel, natural alternatives, and organic options. Be cautious of household products, clothing made from polyester, and non-natural fibers. Both men and women's health and fertility matter. Sperm counts have dropped drastically, and unborn children are greatly affected. This issue has fatal consequences, and we must demand healthier options. Spread awareness, reduce exposure, and prioritize our species' survival.

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

god where do i start first off, this is depressing as hell, but we gotta start talking about it before we go extinct dr. shanna swan + joe rogan discuss the impacts of manmade chemicals aka endocrine disruptors aka fucking EVERYTHING on human health an overview 🤦🏻‍♀️👇 https://t.co/a9V6BYlgES

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

WORLDWIDE fertility has declined 50% in the past 50 years! 🤯 this silent invasion of chemicals prevalent in our daily lives negatively impacts our overall health and fertility. researchers like dr. swan attribute this to ENDOCRINE DISRUPTORS. a shortlist: https://t.co/bx95CvWS6h

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

this shortlist is actually pretty damn long considering HOW MUCH of our lives these chemicals touch and account for. if you want to improve fertility (and you should, even if you don’t want kids), there’s two places to focus on, and it’s not in the bedroom:

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

1️⃣ THE KITCHEN generally want to avoid and remove all plastics (especially when using microwaves if you even dare but plz don’t) and replace with glass n ceramics. and for the love of god — no nonstick pans. use cast iron and stainless steel if cooking food… https://t.co/9frW5cbn8z

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

2️⃣ THE BATHROOM educate yourself on the different chemicals in personal care products and AVOID these disruptors. ladies and gentlemen, this applies to you both. https://t.co/v4NLb7p0ue

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

…or just pull a fast one and get rid of it all! no more make up and false eyelashes. i’ve gone au naturale, and im *this* close to washing my hair w raw egg and raw cream. i made a lip and cheek stain with fresh organic beet juice, aloe vera and castor oil — get creative! https://t.co/V8gjYMCMWQ

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

REPLACEMENT OPTIONS: lotion ➡️ tallow, ghee, oil facial/body soap ➡️ jojoba or olive oil on washcloth toothpaste ➡️ coconut oil deodorant ➡️ powdered sun-dried lemon peels sun screen ➡️ none! just stop eating seed oils perfumes/essential oil ➡️ natural pheromones 😏🥰

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

i recommend you get keen on what’s in ALL of your household products, including cleaning products and detergents. begin taking a closer look at EVERYTHING made from or with plastics or chemicals, and either get rid of it or see how you can replace it with a healthier option. https://t.co/UO73wuCGDM

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

next up: CLOTHING 60% of total supply is made from polyester aka PLASTIC! a quick google search will say there’s no bpa in polyester but… in 2017, American Chemical Society study found 82% out of 77 pieces of infant clothing tested for BPA 😩🍼 https://t.co/ESHUBlasLe

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

BE WARY of sportswear, sports bras…anything that’s not made of natural fibers, and go ORGANIC when possible! literal TONS of pesticides are used in the farming and production of cotton. your skin is your largest organ — help minimize its exposure. https://t.co/ySuFXUfUFS

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

miscarriage and infertility rates are on the rise. we can no longer look away. according to dr. swan: today, a woman in her 20’s is less fertile than her grandmother was at 35! but it’s not just the women… https://t.co/uzF6amVknq

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

unfortunately, if a couple is unable to get pregnant, fingers are often first pointed at the woman — but it takes more than just eggs to bake a cake! conceiving a child is just as contingent upon the man’s health and fertility as well. https://t.co/DHOxTwKsk8

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

if we look at the decline in sperm count, the average across western countries has dropped CATASTROPHICALLY. 1973 - 99M/mL (healthy) 2011 - 47M/mL that’s a 52.5% decline in a mere 38 years! at this rate, sperm counts are on the way to ZERO. zero sperm = extinction ☠️ https://t.co/Ldok0vJ9uV

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

unborn children of pregnant women (fetus in utero) experience the greatest impact of these chemicals. good news is (finally) if conditions are improved, it’s *possible* that it can be reversed in three fucking generations. https://t.co/Wh2xJlciqZ

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

this is a HUGE issue with FATAL repercussions. corporations profit off ignorance at the expense of our health — but some countries are doing better than others! in the U.S., only 11 chemicals are forbidden from personal care items as compared to 1,100+ in european countries https://t.co/hTVS4Wmilb

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

WE ARE AN ENDANGERED SPECIES. if we use the U.S. Fish and Wildlife criteria for listing a species as threatened or endangered, only ONE of these five factors are needed to qualify a species as such …at least THREE apply to us homo sapiens! https://t.co/hXSIe9SeJh

@thatsprettyraw - pret•ty raw

to summarize: human health has been compromised by endocrine disruptors found in, well, EVERYTHING, and it’s imperative we push for healthier processes and options as our fertility — our SPECIES — depends on it. 💠 get educated 💠 reduce exposure 💠 spread the word

SaiKate108
Posted - April 29, 2023 at 4:03 AM
Saved - April 29, 2023 at 4:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Naomi Wolf's examination of Pfizer documents reveals a deliberate intent to sterilize the next generation. The yellow star document outlines 20 ways to ruin women's menstrual health. Four independent doctors report on placenta abnormalities, with one unable to show a normal placenta. Breastfeeding reduced from 34 to 14, milk from vaccinated women contains PEG causing distress in babies, and a 13 to 20 drop in live births across multiple databases with a million missing babies in Europe.

@SaiKate108 - Kat A 🌸

After extensive examination of the Pfizer documents Dr Naomi Wolf cannot escape the conclusion that there was a deliberate intent to sterilise the next generation. The ‘yellow star’ document outlines 20 different ways for ruining women’s menstrual health. Her latest findings from four independent doctors report on the myriad of placenta abnormalities to the extent that one doctor could not show a normal looking placenta anymore. https://fb.watch/kck3PMIZ01/?mibextid=cr9u03…

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Pfizer documents reveal a deliberate effort to harm reproductive health. There are various conditions affecting women's menstrual cycles, such as constant bleeding, two periods a month, or no periods at all. Some women experience agonizing cramps or hemorrhages. The lipid nanoparticles in the vaccines can cross the placenta, leading to compromised placentas in vaccinated mothers. These placentas show calcifications that hinder nourishment and normal growth of the baby. Maternal deaths during childbirth have increased by 40%, resembling a pre-twentieth century situation. The compromised placentas are silvery gray, lack resilience, and result in impaired babies. Fetal malformations and chromosomal aberrations are also being observed. Babies may appear fine at birth but develop respiratory distress within a day.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the Pfizer documents, there's a highly intentional focus on and premeditated, designation of the materials to to sterilize the next generation. And there's the three sixty degree attack on human reproduction. There's a document in the Pfizer documents, which is gonna go down in history as, like, the yellow star of this time. And I'm Jewish, I'm the granddaughter of someone who lost 9 siblings in the Holocaust, so I say that very cautiously and advisedly. This is a document that has 20 different scientific names for ruining women's menstrual cycles and menstrual health. And there are tens of thousands of women in each category that they're tabulating. So 1 category is bleeding every single day of the month for the rest of their lives, presumably, just never not bleeding. Another category is 2 periods a month. Another category is no periods. They're not bleeding at all, meaning no babies, no fertility. And in France there's a group called ou est moncique, where is my cycle, because women just lose lose their menstrual cycles altogether. Another category is agonizing cramps. Another category is hemorrhages. Like these are disabling conditions and women are over presented in the new, populations of the disabled that Ed Dowd, the former BlackRock manager, has been tracking. To the lipid nanoparticles, as I mentioned, traverse the placenta. So now I've got for independent confirmed reports, one from pathologist Ryan Cole, one from to fetal maternal medicine specialist Doctor. James Thorpe and 2 practices in California, one named Ellen Jasmer. I don't know if the other one to hand at the moment, but 4 independent reports showing the same thing is now happening, which is that, the placentas of vaccinated moms are compromised. They're either, they show netting of calcifications and the calcifications are are taking the place of, microvasculature where where the baby would ordinarily be getting nourishment through the blood vessels, through the mom, the calcifications prevent that. The calcifications also are preventing the placentas from growing normally, so they're shrunken placentas. The babies don't have room to grow normally. In, and I was shown pictures by Ellen Jasmer of placentas that are like 2 inches in diameter too small, and that's very common in her practice. I asked her to show me a a normal placenta, and she said that there are no normal placentas in her practice now. They're all compromised. Also the placentas are falling apart. Maternal to deaths and childbirth have gone up by 40%. So we're now going back to a pre-twentieth century condition for childbirth for women in which they can die in childbirth of septicemia or hemorrhages because the placentas are not coming away safely. It's a very dangerous thing. And these placentas are also silvery gray when healthy placentas are reddish purple. Sorry to get so graphic but it's very important if we want to perpetuate the species to understand these things. And these ones are also flat, they just collapse, they have They have no resiliency to like normal placentas to protect the baby. And the babies are being born impaired. Doctor. Thorpe says he's seeing fetal malformations unprecedentedly and chromosomal malformations or aberrations. And Ellen Jasmer said what she's seeing is babies will go home okay but within a day, they'll be rushed to the ER for respiratory distress.

@SaiKate108 - Kat A 🌸

The damage is clear to see. ~ Breast feeding reduced from 34% to 14%. ~ the milk from vaccinated women contains PEG which is causing distress in babies. ~ 13 to 20% drop in live births across multiple data bases. ~ a million missing babies in Europe.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The NIH has confirmed that vaccinated moms have polyethylene glycol in their breast milk, which is causing babies to have failure to thrive. Breastfeeding rates have dropped from 34% to 14% in the last 2 years. Babies who are still nursing from vaccinated moms are ingesting a petroleum byproduct with unknown effects. There has been a 13% to 20% decrease in live births in multiple government databases, with a million missing babies in Europe. Neonatal deaths have doubled in Scotland and increased significantly in other regions. Pfizer's documents suggest a focus on sterilization, as they conducted experiments on rats' reproductive organs. The intentionality behind these investigations is unclear.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the NIH, also has published an independent study confirming that there's now polyethylene glycol in the breast milk of vaccinated moms and that it's leading to babies having failure to thrive. They're agitated. They're, they're they're they're distraught. They're sleepless. And in fact, breastfeeding has gone from 34% of all new moms to 14% in the last 2 years. So very few babies now are getting that really important immunity of nursing mother and the ones who are still nursing if the moms are vaccinated are getting a petroleum byproduct in their food. And there's no, again, no studies showing, how babies can survive this. And The end result of all of this, and I could go on and on with other details about the harms to human sexuality and reproduction, but Predictably enough, there's a 13% to 20% drop in live births and babies, in multiple government databases around the world, but especially in the West. And I'm including Australia. I know you're not in the west, but especially in the developed world. And there's a 1000000 missing babies in Europe. In other words, what's happening is exactly what you would predict. Babies either are not coming to term or they're not surviving. There's been a doubling of neonatal deaths in Scotland. There are 81 neonatal deaths in the Canadian province where usually they have 2 or 3. There was a tripling of neonatal deaths among vaccinated moms in 1 Israeli hospital and so on. I will say that When you look at the Pfizer documents, it's impossible to wish away this focus on sterilizing people basically, because the intentionality of their investigations is so clear. For example, It's a respiratory virus. Right? It's a respiratory virus. Why in the Pfizer documents did Pfizer mate rats, including a vaccinated male and unvaccinated female, sacrifice both genders and then analyze the, cells of the reproductive organs of both genders. It's a reproductive fire I'm sorry, respiratory virus doesn't make any sense unless their focus was on human reproduction or mammalian reproduction. I'm going to skip ahead
ChildrensHD
Posted - May 16, 2023 at 9:28 PM
Saved - May 16, 2023 at 9:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
COVID-19 vaccine mandates have had negative impacts on pregnant women and their babies. The vaccine's contents cross physiological barriers and increase the risk of adverse fetal outcomes and miscarriage. Birth rates in Europe have also decreased since the vaccine's widespread use. Watch the full episode on CHDTV and read more on TheDefender.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Vaccine Mandates Took a Toll on Pregnant Women and Their Babies: Here’s What Happened • COVID-19 shot contents are biodistributed into the bloodstream within hours and cross “all physiological barriers including the maternal-placental-fetal barrier and the blood-brain barriers in both the mother and the fetus,” according to maternal-fetal medicine expert Dr. James Thorp. • Data revealed a 27-fold higher risk of miscarriage and a more than two-fold increased risk of adverse fetal outcomes across six different categories following COVID-19 shots. • Birth rates in multiple European countries fell significantly at the end of 2021, months after COVID-19 shots became widely utilized.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Pregnant women who received COVID-19 shots experienced concerning effects, according to maternal fetal medicine expert Dr. Against Thorpe. The shots quickly spread throughout the body, crossing barriers like the placenta and blood-brain barriers in both the mother and fetus. Compared to the flu vaccine, COVID-19 shots led to more adverse events in women of reproductive age. Data showed a 27-fold higher risk of miscarriage and over twice the risk of negative fetal outcomes across six categories. Additionally, birth rates in several European countries dropped significantly after widespread COVID-19 vaccination. As a result, researchers are urging the immediate suspension of COVID-19 vaccination for individuals of childbearing and reproductive age.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Many pregnant women were forced to get COVID shots and here's what's happened to them. COVID nineteen shots, contents are bio distributed into the bloodstream within hours and cross all physiological barriers, including the maternal placental fetal barrier and the blood brain barriers in both the mother and the fetus according to maternal fetal medicine expert, doctor against Thorpe. Compared to the flu vaccine, COVID nineteen shots are associated with a significant increase in adverse events among women of reproductive age. Data revealed a 27 fold higher risk of miscarriage and a more than twofold increased risk of adverse fetal outcomes across 6 different categories following COVID nineteen shots. Birth rate to multiple European countries fell significantly at the end of 2021, months after COVID nineteen shots became widely utilized. Researchers have called for the immediate suspension of COVID nineteen vaccination for all persons of childbearing and reproductive age.

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Watch the full episode on #CHDTV: https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/covid-vaccine-deaths-per-million-with-jessica-rose-phd/

COVID Vaccine Deaths per Million With Jessica Rose, Ph.D. Jessica Rose, Ph.D. joins Polly Tommey, ‘Good Morning CHD’ host, to share jaw-dropping research on COVID vaccination outcomes and inform viewers on the lates... live.childrenshealthdefense.org

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Read more about this story on #TheDefender: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pregnant-women-forced-covid-shots-cola/

Many Pregnant Women Were Forced to Get COVID Shots. Here’s What Happened to Them. COVID-19 shot contents are biodistributed into the bloodstream within hours and cross “all physiologic barriers including the maternal-placental-fetal barrier and the blood brain barriers in both the mother and the fetus,” according to maternal-fetal medicine expert Dr. James Thorp. childrenshealthdefense.org
goddeketal
Posted - August 8, 2023 at 6:26 PM
Saved - August 9, 2023 at 5:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Journalists have cited various reasons for the rise in heart damage, but they overlook the experimental gene therapy given to billions worldwide. Here are 20 factors: 1) Weather, 2) Artificial sweeteners, 3) Climate change, 4) Gardening, 5) Exercising, 6) Being too happy, 7) Eating eggs, 8) Lack of masking, 9) Falling asleep with the TV on, 10) Shaking the duvet, 11) Giving birth in early 20s, 12) Mental illness, 13) Taking a shit, 14) Weekendlie ins, 15) Being sarcastic, 16) Living in rural areas, 17) Keto Diet, 18) Young people doing sports, 19) Gaming. Fact-checkers deny gene therapy's role. Let's restore common sense.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

Over the past three years, journalists have come up with many reasons for the rise in heart damage (e.g. showering). However, none blamed it on the experimental gene therapy administered to billions around the globe. Let me walk you through my TOP 20 reasons in this THREAD. 🧵⬇️ https://t.co/sBsQM5iSTN

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#1 The weather: Both summer and winter temperatures, according to mainstream journalists, are to blame for the increased number of heart diseases and blood clots. It seems we're just in for a heart-stopping season no matter the weather! 🤡🌎 https://t.co/kR8vcgdCWy

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#2 Artificial sweeteners: According to a study, artificial sweeteners are responsible for an increased risk of heart attacks. Guess that's just another "bitter" finding in the world of "sweet" science! 🤡🌎 https://t.co/fXuoB7F2ac

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#3 Climate change: Babies' hearts are not damaged by the v4xx, but by climate change, another study claims. 🤡🌎 https://t.co/oGqGtUpiFf

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#4 Gardening: Nothing is better for the immune system than 'eating dirt'. And now suddenly, exposure to soil is supposed to increase the risk of killer heart disease? Whoever believes that probably also believes that the gene therapy is safe and effective. 🤡🌎 https://t.co/9ohTD1C7BF

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#5 Exercising: A study found that exercising can double the risk of heart disease for white man. 🤡🌎 https://t.co/mMVlSzuwiq

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#6 Being too happy: Got a heart attack after receiving the clot shot? Maybe you were just too happy. (By the way; which lunatic scientists even test and confirm such crazy hypotheses?)🤡🌎 https://t.co/hT4ZpNVX5T

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#7 Eating eggs: Eggs are among the healthiest foods one can eat. Perhaps that's why there's an attempt to convince us otherwise. This is junk science! 🤡🌎 https://t.co/QztqjhYs9Z

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#8 Lack of Masking: CBS News's medical 'expert', @celinegounder (she/her 🇺🇦) suggests a lack of masks and missed vaccines caused heart attacks in youth. Yeah right... 🤡🌎 https://t.co/BqKEl9gKqG

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#9 Falling asleep with the TV on: 100% of this study's participants were probably double-jabbed and boosted. 🤡🌎 https://t.co/N8cDA8R2Xi

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#10 Shaking the duvet: The next time you shake out your duvet, be aware that you're putting yourself in mortal danger. 🤡🌎 https://t.co/YZat9PoUy7

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#11 Giving birth in early 20s: Caution to biological women in their early 20s: think twice, even thrice, before choosing to get pregnant early. According to the eugenicists aiming to depopulate the earth, having babies at a young age is life-threatening. 🤡🌎 https://t.co/JKzrWvBzYr

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#12 Mental illness: Supposedly, not only do happy people have an increased risk of getting a heart attack, but also those who are chronically sad. So, which is it? 🤡🌎 https://t.co/LIUpLcMX6Y

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#13 Taking a shit: Monitor how often you take a dumb each day, as it could impact your cardiac health. 🤡🌎 https://t.co/DApz1V7tok

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#14 Weekend-lie ins: Sleeping in on the weekend is supposedly the ultimate heart-killer. Since waking up early is considered racist, it's quite challenging to make the right choice these days. 🤡🌎 https://t.co/yP0aolLXiD

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#15 Being sarcastic: Oh, great! Now even sarcasm gives you a heart attack? Well, that's just the "heartfelt" news I was waiting for. 🤡🌎 https://t.co/hiE3asAW3V

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#16 Living in rural areas: Regarding this study, living in rural areas will increase the chance getting a heart attack. Probably too much gardening and consumption of organic chicken eggs. 🤡🌎 https://t.co/KXl7KI7wOc

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#17 Keto Diet: Scientists be like "eat more carbs and sugars". This research is for the special waste. 🤡🌎 https://t.co/EU645JaEDx

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#18: Young people doing sports: Apparently, practicing sports is risky these days... 🤡🌎 https://t.co/nSxSKwO4lM

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#19: Gaming: ...so is playing video games. 🤡🌎 https://t.co/YY7gRphwYC

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#20: But fortunately, fact checkers assured us that heart attacks in children have many causes, but definitely not the experimental gene therapy. PHEW! Dodged a bullet! 🤡🌎 https://t.co/FxJkxZniNc

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#21: Thank you for reading and sharing this thread. It's only a matter of time before such headlines circulate and people start to view them as 'normal.' It's high time to make common sense common again. Cheers, and yes, I'm keeping all the receipts! Simon (@goddeketal - click!) https://t.co/e94PfSJUF6

VigilantFox
Posted - August 22, 2023 at 7:34 PM
Saved - September 1, 2023 at 7:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Maternal death rates in America have surged by 50% since the vaccine rollout, according to a report by the National Center for Health Statistics. The maternal mortality rate for 2021 was 329 deaths per 100,000 live births, a significant increase compared to previous years. While the rate has been gradually rising over the past three decades, the surge in deaths in 2021 is concerning. Some sources attribute the increase to COVID, but the introduction of vaccines should have mitigated this. Dr. McCullough suggests that the COVID vaccines themselves may be a factor. Pregnant women were excluded from initial vaccine trials, yet thousands received the vaccine later. The safety and effectiveness of the vaccines for pregnant women remain questionable. The high maternal death rates in 2021 raise concerns about what the numbers will look like in 2022.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

🚨 Disturbing Trend: Maternal Death Rates Have Soared 50% in America Since Vaccine Rollout A “terrible report” by the National Center for Health Statistics, came out earlier this year. What that report shows is that maternal death rates are increasing in America — and fast.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Children and pregnant women were used as shields to protect the elderly, which was a violation of human ethics. Despite pregnant women being excluded from randomized trials, thousands of them were vaccinated when the vaccine program started in the United States. The maternal mortality rate in the country reached an all-time high, with women dying while pregnant or within 42 days after giving birth. The CDC reported that 65% of women who had a baby in the United States received a vaccine either before or during their pregnancy.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For the first time ever, we used children as shields to protect the elderly, it seems to me. Well, you know, even children and pregnant women, that was one of the biggest violations of human ethics. Remember, pregnant women and women of childbearing potential strictly excluded from the randomized trials Right. As they came in in November. December 10th, when this vaccine program started in the United States, thousands of pregnant women were vaccinated, now what pregnant woman would come forward and do it, number 1? Number 2, who would actually do that? They must know that that's not right. And then things took off. You know, terrible report came in spring of this year. HOYERT, National Center For Health Statistics, published on the CDC website, maternal mortality in the United States, all time high. It's erased decades. This is women dying with babies in the womb or 42 days afterwards. And we know the CDC separately has told us 65% of women who delivered a baby in the United States took a shot either before the pregnancy or during the pregnancy.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#2 - The WHO defines maternal death as “the death of a woman while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy, irrespective of the duration and the site of the pregnancy, from any cause related to or aggravated by the pregnancy or its management ...”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#3 - In plain English, that means the death of a pregnant woman from non-accidental causes within 42 days following or during pregnancy.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#4 - “The maternal mortality rate for 2021 was 32.9 deaths per 100,000 live births, compared with a rate of 23.8 in 2020 and 20.1 in 2019,” according to the National Center for Health Statistics.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#5 - That’s a 38.2% increase compared to 2020 and a 63.7% increase from 2019. Overall, a 50% increase in maternal mortality — very troubling numbers.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#6 - In all fairness, the maternal death rate in America has been gradually rising over the past three decades, despite spending the most money on healthcare, but the surge in maternal deaths in 2021 is an outlier, even with the prior trend.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#7 - So, what’s causing the sharp increase? Sources like CNN put the blame on COVID, but COVID existed in both 2020 and 2021. And with the introduction of “miracle vaccines,” that should have slowed down maternal death rates from COVID, right? So, why the sudden rise?

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#8 - Dr. McCullough expressed to Del Bigtree on The Highwire that so-called COVID vaccines themselves might have something to do with it.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#9 - “This is women dying with babies in the womb or 42 days afterwards. And we know the CDC separately has told us 65% of women who delivered a baby in the United States took a shot either before the pregnancy or during the pregnancy.”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#10 - He added that injecting pregnant women when the vaccine program began was “one of the biggest violations of human ethics.” Pregnant women and those of childbearing potential were not included in the initial randomized COVID vaccine trials in November.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#11 - However, by December 10, when the vaccine program began in the U.S., thousands of pregnant women received the vaccine.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#12 - And from there on, public figures like former CDC Director Rochelle Walensky repeatedly told pregnant women to get vaccinated. “There is no bad time!”

Video Transcript AI Summary
It is safe to get vaccinated while breastfeeding. There is no bad time to get vaccinated, whether you are thinking about having a baby, pregnant, or have already delivered your baby.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is it safe to get vaccinated while you're breastfeeding? It absolutely is safe to get vaccinated. So I would say if you are thinking about getting vaccinated, there is no bad time to get vaccinated. Get vaccinated while you're thinking about having a baby, before you're thinking about having a baby, while you're pregnant with your baby or after you've delivered your baby, there is no bad time.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#13 - “Get vaccinated while you’re thinking about having a baby, before you’re thinking about having a baby, while you’re pregnant with your baby, or after you’ve delivered your baby. There is no bad time!”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#14 - How could Rochelle Walensky confidently assure pregnant women and women hoping to become pregnant that the COVID vaccines were “safe and effective” if pregnant women were excluded from the initial randomized trials?

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#15 - And one question remains: if the 2021 maternal death rates are this high, what will the 2022 numbers look like?

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

END - If you found this thread newsworthy or to hold valuable information, please share the initial tweet below to increase exposure:

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

And while you're here, check out these other stories that I've written: Ed Dowd Drops Bombshell Data: Hematological (Blood-Related) Claims Up 522% Above Trend in 2022 https://vigilantnews.com/post/ed-dowd-drops-bombshell-data-hematological-blood-related-claims-up-522-above-trend-in-2022

Ed Dowd Drops Bombshell Data: Hematological (Blood-Related) Claims Up 522% Above Trend in 2022 “The trends were stable — and then this exploded.” vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

RFK Jr. Identifies “The Real Shooter” Behind His Father’s Death https://vigilantnews.com/post/rfk-jr-identifies-the-real-shooter-behind-his-fathers-death

RFK Jr. Identifies “The Real Shooter” Behind His Father’s Death “When I sat down and read the autopsy report, it became clear to me, as it would to anybody who read that report, that Sirhan could not have killed my father.” vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The ‘Next Pandemic’: What You Need to Do to Be Ready https://vigilantnews.com/post/the-next-pandemic-what-you-need-to-do-to-be-ready

The ‘Next Pandemic’: What You Need to Do to Be Ready “You’ve seen all the threats from the establishment suggesting that there’s not going to be drug availability in the not-too-distant future ... So, look at that and protect yourselves.” vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

RFK Jr. Identifies “The Real Shooter” Behind His Father’s Death https://vigilantnews.com/post/rfk-jr-identifies-the-real-shooter-behind-his-fathers-death

RFK Jr. Identifies “The Real Shooter” Behind His Father’s Death “When I sat down and read the autopsy report, it became clear to me, as it would to anybody who read that report, that Sirhan could not have killed my father.” vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

“X” Is Not Living Up to What Elon Musk Promised: Here’s Why https://vigilantnews.com/post/x-is-not-living-up-to-what-elon-musk-promised-heres-why

“X” Is Not Living Up to What Elon Musk Promised: Here’s Why Elon Musk is widely hailed as a genius, a disruptor, and sometimes, a misfit. However, several of his promises to uphold Twitter (now X) as a ‘“free speech” platform have fallen through. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Spike Proteins 101: What You Need to Know to Keep Yourself Safe https://vigilantnews.com/post/spike-proteins-101-what-you-need-to-know-to-keep-yourself-safe

Spike Proteins 101: What You Need to Know to Keep Yourself Safe It's now known that spike proteins linger in the body, potentially causing damage to vital organ systems. But recent research has shed light on potential strategies to mitigate the effects of the spike protein. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

I Asked AI to Draw Me the Next President of the United States: This Is Who Appeared https://vigilantnews.com/post/i-asked-ai-to-draw-me-the-next-president-of-the-united-states-this-is-who-appeared

I Asked AI to Draw Me the Next President of the United States: This Is Who Appeared The next question we should ask: what does Midjourney know that we don’t? vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Unvaccinated Will Be Vindicated: A Tribute to the Citizen Heroes of Our Time https://vigilantnews.com/post/the-unvaccinated-will-be-vindicated-a-tribute-to-the-citizen-heroes-of-our-time

The Unvaccinated Will Be Vindicated: A Tribute to the Citizen Heroes of Our Time Mandates are now becoming a thing of the past, thanks to brave freedom fighters who had the courage to say NO. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Two years ago, I never imagined that I would be reporting the news every day. It's been a wild ride, and all your support has been nothing short of incredible. I'm beyond grateful to be able to take this next step. Thank you all. And don't forget to give @VigilantNews a follow. https://t.co/z1mv2JFfGG

P_McCulloughMD
Posted - September 24, 2023 at 9:59 PM
Saved - September 25, 2023 at 4:26 AM

@P_McCulloughMD - Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH™

Thorp et al demonstrated a multi-fold increased risk of fetal loss with COVID-19 vaccination. This coincides with an increased risk of maternal death as well. About 65% of mother took the vaccine before or during pregnancy in 2021-2022.

@BusyDrT - Dr Sherri Tenpenny

WOW! What could have possibly caused this devastating spike in miscarriages??? https://openvaers.com/covid-data/reproductive-health

Reproductive Health - OpenVAERS openvaers.com
P_McCulloughMD
Posted - October 28, 2023 at 10:30 AM
Saved - October 29, 2023 at 8:28 PM

@P_McCulloughMD - Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH™

Vaccination of any type in pregnancy provokes a fever which can trigger a miscarriage, stillbirth, and premature labor. Many women consider these risks far greater than the theoretical benefit of reducing the risks of mild/treatable illnesses. #courageousdiscourse @EpochTimes https://t.co/9LKQTHNDZx

ichudov
Posted - November 18, 2023 at 8:43 PM
Saved - November 19, 2023 at 1:25 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A recent study reveals the harmful effects of COVID vaccines on newborns when administered to mothers. Premature births, NICU admissions, and fetal abnormalities are among the listed concerns. Notably, Moderna, with its higher dose, appears to have the most detrimental impact. In pregnant women, Moderna increases the risk of miscarriage by 42% compared to the lower-dose Pfizer vaccine. The probability of this finding being a random occurrence is extremely low. Additionally, Moderna doubles the chances of infant death compared to Pfizer. These findings suggest a dose-response relationship, resembling the effects of poisons. While Pfizer also poses risks during pregnancy, Moderna proves to be even more concerning.

@ichudov - Igor Chudov 🐭

A new study shows how COVID vaccines, given to mothers, harm their newborns. Premature births, NICU admissions, and fetal abnormalities listed. Moderna (higher dose vaccine) is the worst! https://www.igor-chudov.com/p/covid-vaccines-harm-newborns-study

COVID Vaccines Harm Newborns, Study Proves Moderna Causes More Fetal Damage than Pfizer due to Higher Dose igor-chudov.com

@ichudov - Igor Chudov 🐭

Moderna (a higher dose vaccine), when given to pregnant women, leads to a 42% higher chance of miscarriage compared to lower-dose Pfizer. Probability that it is a random fluke finding is less than 0.00001. Read here: 👇 https://www.igor-chudov.com/p/cdc-data-moderna-causes-42-more-miscarriages

CDC Data: Moderna Causes 42% MORE Miscarriages Compared to Pfizer Is there a DOSE-RESPONSE Relationship? igor-chudov.com

@ichudov - Igor Chudov 🐭

Moderna (a higher-dose vaccine), given to pregnant women, DOUBLES the chances of infant death, compared to the lower-dose Pfizer vaccine. Read here: 👇 https://www.igor-chudov.com/p/moderna-doubles-the-chance-of-infant

Moderna DOUBLES the Chance of Infant Death, Compared to Pfizer Another Slide from CDC Presentation Shows Statistically Significant Difference igor-chudov.com

@ichudov - Igor Chudov 🐭

That the higher-dose treatment increases chances of adverse outcomes (miscarriage and infant death) means that there is a dose-response relationship, typical for poisons. Pfizer is also bad for pregnancy - but Moderna is even worse.

Babygravy9
Posted - December 28, 2023 at 4:09 PM
Saved - December 28, 2023 at 4:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Prenatal stress, including factors like a vegetarian diet and mass stresses like wars, can skew the gender ratio, resulting in more girls being born. Vegetarian mothers have been found to have a smaller number of boys compared to omnivorous mothers. The added stress of not consuming animal products can threaten the viability of the fetus, leading to premature births or spontaneous abortion. Male babies seem to suffer more from maternal stress, as seen after stressful events like 9/11. The adoption of a global plant-based diet, like the Planetary Health Diet proposed in the Great Reset, may further skew the gender ratio, resulting in fewer boys being born. This potential parallel between the Great Reset and the first agricultural revolution is explored in the book "The Eggs Benedict Option." To learn more, read the book.

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

Prenatal stress is also know to skew the gender ratio, causing more girls to be born than boys. This has been substantiated with regard to individual maternal stresses, like a vegetarian diet, and mass stresses including wars and events like 9/11.👇

@T3MaxxiAlt - T3Uncoupled

Prenatal stress brought on by war is the real conversion therapy. https://t.co/sZjSH7mZP1

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

A study from 2000 looked at six thousand pregnant women and found that a considerably smaller number of boys were born to vegetarian mothers. Vegetarian women were 23% less likely to have male babies than mothers on an omnivorous diet. https://t.co/ByNbCxDWqD

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

Why? This is almost certainly due to the added stress that not eating animal products causes the mother's body (i.e. deficiencies of key nutrients, vits and mins). This threatens the viability of the fetus and can cause premature births or even spontaneous abortion.

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

But why do boys suffer most? This isn't clear, but other evidence clearly substantiates that male babies suffer more from maternal stress. After "stressful" historical events like 9/11, demographers have noted that fewer male babies are born. https://t.co/bHQqBQQxIc

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

As noted in my book The Eggs Benedict Option, a possible effect of the adoption of a global plant-based diet is that it will skew the gender ratio, leading to the birth of fewer boys than would be normal. The normal ratio is 105 boys for every 100 girls. https://x.com/Babygravy9/status/1565347954847670272?s=20

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

Of course you know Klaus Schwab wants you to eat bugs, but what does the Great Reset really mean in terms of the food we’re going to eat? Let me introduce you to the Planetary Health Diet, the first ever truly global diet. 👇 https://t.co/boXLRx181l

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

This is one fascinating potential parallel between the Great Reset and the first agricultural revolution (the transition to grain agriculture), which caused significant changes to sexual dimorphism (i.e. the differences between male and female). https://x.com/Babygravy9/status/1560633901613080576?s=20

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

Central to my new book, THE EGGS BENEDICT OPTION, is a comparison of the first Agricultural Revolution (AR), c.10,000 years ago, and the new one Klaus Schwab and the globalists are trying to usher in. So what was the first AR like? Let me take you back to Çatalhöyük. 👇 https://t.co/DlHjsqSJbd

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

Want to know more? Read my book The Eggs Benedict Option. https://x.com/Babygravy9/status/1558520318842601478?s=20

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

My new book THE EGGS BENEDICT OPTION is now available via @AntelopeHill, Amazon and other third-party retailers. The book features an exclusive preface by @NoorBinLadin and tells you everything you need to know about the Great Reset and how to fight it. Want to know more? 👇 https://t.co/oUelpyTEHO

NaturallyFTW
Posted - February 4, 2024 at 4:04 PM
Saved - February 4, 2024 at 8:09 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Prenatal ultrasound, once believed to be safe, has been shown to cause DNA damage, increased autism, and brain and intestinal damage. There has been very little research on its safety, and most studies were done in the 1970s with lower intensity machines. Human studies from China have shown alarming results, including damage to various organs. Routine ultrasound screening for low-risk pregnancies has been proven ineffective and can lead to worse outcomes. Ultrasound exposes female fetuses to radiation, which is especially concerning considering they are born with all their eggs. The assumption of ultrasound safety is just that - an assumption.

@NaturallyFTW - Natural Immunity FTW

🚨 Nearly 100% of humans are now being exposed to a type of radiation ☢️ that doctors say is "tOtaLLy sAfE" yet it’s been shown to cause: • DNA damage • Increased Autism • Brain & intestinal damage And the graphs for autism, cancer, & more have gone up in tandem the last 50 years, since this procedure has become routine... I’m talking about Prenatal Ultrasound. I used to think it was just “sound waves” and it had been proven “safe & effective”… Nothing could be further from the truth. The more I looked into prenatal ultrasound research, the more SHOCKED & DISTURBED I was at what I saw. Here we are subjecting every single vulnerable new human fetus to this medical procedure, and yet the truth is that there's actually been VERY little research done on the safety of ultrasound. Even worse, the majority of the research was done in the 1970s, with primitive machines, when the intensity limit was EIGHT-FOLD LOWER. 🤦‍♀️ Yet even with a low level of ultrasound exposure, studies using actual Human ultrasound machines have shown concerning results: • Increased Autism incidence & severity in humans & mice; impaired social behavior. • Cells exposed to ultrasound had DNA abnormalities that persisted for several generations (linked to cancer). • Nearly Double the rate of fetal malformations w/more ultrasounds. • 5 minutes of ultrasound (very close to the current intensity limits set for prenatal ultrasound) resulted in intestinal bleeding in mice. • Many more alarming changes (see 2nd tweet 🧵) ❗️ There's even 50 HUMAN studies from China that have been all but buried (but you can find if you know where to look), which showed incredibly alarming results: Ultrasound-exposed fetuses (from terminated pregnancies) were examined, & damage was observed for neurons, DNA, cornea, chorionic villi, ovaries, testes, kidneys, glands and more. 😱 Ultrasound is a type of (non-ionizing) radiation that is clearly capable of producing significant biological effects in humans. In 1992, when the intensity limit was increased 8-fold, because of a regulatory loophole there was no safety testing required. Very little further testing has been done since 1992. Our assumption of prenatal ultrasound safety is just that - an assumption. Yet nearly 100% of babies are subjected to increasingly more ultrasound exposure: ⚠️ At each medical visit in the form of a doppler device to "hear" the heartbeat (doppler is continuous wave, & even more dangerous). ⚠️ At least 2 lengthy routine scans during pregnancy. ⚠️ Often Many hours of ultrasound before birth, by use of "continuous fetal monitoring" during labor. What's worse, the routine ultrasound screening of low-risk moms has been shown again & again to NOT IMPROVE OUTCOME for mom or baby. Studies show ultrasound monitoring actually often leads to worse outcomes, due to misdiagnoses leading to further interventions (like C-sections). Clearly, there are high risk scenarios where the benefits of ultrasound outweigh the risks. But when it comes to the routine screening of low risk pregnancies, ultrasound is at best ineffective, & at worst downright Dangerous to the future of humanity. References & more info, below 👇🧵

@NaturallyFTW - Natural Immunity FTW

Female fetuses are born with all the eggs they'll ever have, & we're exposing them to ultrasound radiation. There's no other time where cells are more vulnerable than while in the womb. Our kids are not guinea pigs. REFERENCES & more Ultrasound Dangers: • THE HARD TO FIND CHINESE HUMAN STUDIES on human fetuses exposed to ultrasound produced alarming results - Damage observed in neurons, DNA, cornea, chorionic villi, ovaries, testes, kidneys, glands and more: https://amzn.to/3UnB2xj • DEATH of human babies - large UK study found that healthy mothers and babies that received two or more Doppler scans had more than 2 times the risk of perinatal death compared to babies unexposed to Doppler: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1360032/ • SMALLER, SHORTER BABIES - A randomized clinical trial split 2,743 women into two group. After adjusting for other confounding variables, babies w/more ultrasounds tended to be shorter: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8855394/ • LOW BIRTH WEIGHT - Australian study found babies that received more ultrasound radiation were 30% more likely to develop intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR): https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8105165/ • LOW BIRTH WEIGHT in humans - infants receiving more ultrasounds were more likely to have low birth weights: https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/uog.13399 • AUTISM - mice Exposed to Diagnostic Ultrasound In Utero Are Less Social; display autistic behavior: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aur.1349 • AUTISM - Child study shows possible link of ultrasound received in the 2nd trimester & autism: https://www.princeton.edu/~sswang/ASD/Antenatal_Ultrasound_Risk_ASD.pdf • AUTISM - "the rising rates of autism coincident with the increased use of ultrasound in obstetrics and its teratogenic/toxic effects on the CNS demand further research": https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20149552/ • AUTISM SEVERITY - male children with autism exposed to first trimester ultrasound had "significantly decreased non-verbal IQ & increased repetitive behaviors" compared to children w/autism who received no ultrasounds: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/aur.1690 • DNA SCATTERING - "Ultrasound exposure longer than 15 seconds has been shown to induce significant DNA scattering": https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10001275/ • MALFORMATIONS in humans - study of thousands of women showed nearly Double the rate of fetal malformations when exposed to more ultrasounds (0.9% [38/4297] vs. 0.5% [38/7846] in those exposed to fewer scans: https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/uog.6328 • MALFORMATIONS in mice - the embryotoxic effects of ultrasound exposure in pregnant mice increase in the incidence of malformed fetuses & occurrence of multiple malformations in fetuses as intensity of the ultrasonic exposure increased: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6867946/ • DANGEROUS DNA CHANGES - abnormalities that persisted for several generations: https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/abs/10.1148/131.1.177?journalCode=radiology • BEHAVIORAL CHANGES & LOW BIRTH WEIGHT in monkeys exposed to human commercial ultrasound machines: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/tera.1420390207 • NERVOUS SYSTEM damage - toxic effects of ultrasound in mice - damage to central and autonomic nervous systems: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0041008X80903567 • BAD NEURONAL EFFECTS - just 30 minutes of prenatal ultrasound exposure (using a commercial ultrasound machine) caused neurons to fail to acquire their proper position: https://www.pnas.org/content/103/34/12903 • MYELINATION DISRUPTION - diagnostic levels of ultrasound disrupt myelination: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0014488687900732 • LACK OF ULTRASOUND SAFETY STUDIES - "there have been no high-quality human epidemiological studies involving modern ultrasound machines": https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2390856 • LOW BODY WEIGHT & FETAL LOSS - ultrasound exposure led to more fetal loss & a significant reduction in fetal body weight: https://meridian.allenpress.com/radiation-research/article-abstract/130/1/125/39314/Effect-of-Prenatal-Exposure-to-Diagnostic • INTESTINAL BLEEDING - 5 minutes of ultrasound very close to the current intensity limits set for prenatal ultrasound "can result in the occurrence of intestinal hemorrhage in mice...these effects must be investigated" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10001275/ • SLOWING OF CELLULAR DIVISION - diagnostic ultrasound induces 22% reduced rate of cellular division & far more cell death in small intestines: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0024320501009407 • DELAYED SPEECH in children - "Conclusion: An association between prenatal ultrasonography exposure and delayed speech was found...The findings suggest that a child with delayed speech is about twice as likely as a child without delayed speech to have been exposed to prenatal ultrasound waves" (NOTE - there was a subsequent study that failed to produce these results - but that study used even lower intensities than Before 1992) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1485930/ • INCREASED LEVEL OF LEFT-HANDEDNESS - several studies have shown increased left-handedness in those exposed to ultrasound: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2390856 • LEFT-HANDEDNESS is associated w/health issues - "numerous studies demonstrated association between left-handedness and different health problems ranging from learning disorders to breast cancer and decreased longevity": https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3345498 • REFLEXES - children exposed to ultrasound in utero had abnormal grasp and tonic neck reflexes 1 year later: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51594413_Potential_Adverse_Ultrasound-related_Biological_Effects_A_Critical_Review • DYSLEXIA - relation between prenatal ultrasound exposure and dyslexia: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12071478/ • LEARNING & MEMORY negatively affected by 4-20 minutes of prenatal ultrasound - "noticeable deficits in behavior occurred in the group exposed to ultrasound for 20 min...levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) were significantly lower": https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301562914006127 • BRAIN BLEEDING - brain hemorrhages in mouse pups exposed in the womb to pulsed ultrasound for 3 minutes at doses similar to those used on human babies: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562999000459 • ULTRASOUND MONITORING LEADS TO UNNECESSARY INTERVENTIONS: nearly 90% of labors in the US are monitored via ultrasound, but studies show this has no benefit for labor outcome, and even worse "continuously monitored mothers are subjected to significantly more interventions—oxytocin stimulation, forceps deliveries, episiotomies, C-sections": https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/ob-gyns-do-too-much-fetal-monitoring • UNKNOWN ISSUES could arise from prenatal ultrasound use, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine warns "...possible problems could be identified in the future, especially because these unregulated scans are longer, use more energy and can be more frequent": https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna4609938 • ULTRASOUND DURING PREGNANCY DOESN'T IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES - 4 studies of thousands of women show that routine ultrasound does not improve health outcomes for women or babies: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199309163291201 • 8-FOLD INCREASE in ultrasound intensity limit was implemented in 1992, no safety testing required: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2390856

Amazon.com amazon.com
Randomised controlled trial of Doppler ultrasound screening of placental perfusion during pregnancy - PubMed We have done a randomised controlled trial to assess the effect on primary management and outcome of routine doppler ultrasound examinations of the umbilical and uterine arteries during pregnancy. Over 9 months, 2600 women with singleton pregnancies were recruited from a general obstetric population … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Characterisation of the possible effect on birthweight following frequent prenatal ultrasound examinations - PubMed The objective of this study was to evaluate and characterise by study of newborn biometry a possible effect on birthweight which we observed previously in a randomised controlled trial of multiple prenatal ultrasound examinations. A total of 2743 women with single pregnancies had been allocated at r … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Effects of frequent ultrasound during pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial - PubMed Despite widespread application of ultrasound imaging and Doppler blood flow studies, the effects of their frequent and repeated use in pregnancy have not been evaluated in controlled trials. From 2834 women with single pregnancies at 16-20 weeks gestation, 1415 were selected at random to receive ult … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Potential teratogenic effects of ultrasound on corticogenesis: implications for autism - PubMed The phenotypic expression of autism, according to the Triple Hit Hypothesis, is determined by three factors: a developmental time window of vulnerability, genetic susceptibility, and environmental stressors. In utero exposure to thalidomide, valproic acid, and maternal infections are examples of som … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
A Review on Biological Effects of Ultrasounds: Key Messages for Clinicians Ultrasound (US) is acoustic energy that interacts with human tissues, thus, producing bioeffects that may be hazardous, especially in sensitive organs (i.e., brain, eye, heart, lung, and digestive tract) and embryos/fetuses. Two basic mechanisms of US ... ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The embryotoxic effects of ultrasound exposure in pregnant ICR mice - PubMed The embryotoxicity of ultrasound exposure during pregnancy was investigated in DUB:(ICR) mice. On day 0 of gestation (day of plug), pregnant mice were assigned to one of five groups: cage control, sham exposed (0 W/cm2), 0.05 W/cm2, 0.50 W/cm2. or 1.00 W/cm2. Females were anesthetized on day 8 of ge … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Toxic effects of ultrasound in mice: Damage to central and autonomic nervous systems Whole-body exposure of pregnant Swiss-Webster mice to ultrasound at 37°C, 2 MHz, 1 W/cm2, continuous wave, for periods ranging from 80 to 200 sec resu… sciencedirect.com
Diagnostic levels of ultrasound may disrupt myelination Neonatal rats 3 to 5 days of age were exposed to the ultrasound beam from a medical ultrasound imaging system. Dorsal nerve roots were examined by ele… sciencedirect.com
Safety Assurance in Obstetrical Ultrasound Safety assurance for diagnostic ultrasound in obstetrics began with a tacit assumption of safety allowed by a federal law enacted in 1976 for then-existing medical ultrasound equipment. The implementation of the 510(k) pre-market approval process for ... ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
A Review on Biological Effects of Ultrasounds: Key Messages for Clinicians Ultrasound (US) is acoustic energy that interacts with human tissues, thus, producing bioeffects that may be hazardous, especially in sensitive organs (i.e., brain, eye, heart, lung, and digestive tract) and embryos/fetuses. Two basic mechanisms of US ... ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Diagnostic ultrasound induces change within numbers of cryptal mitotic and apoptotic cells in small intestine Recent work on gas filled organs, including the lung and small intestine, has concentrated on the hemorrhaging effects of ultrasound, with little atte… sciencedirect.com
Case-control study of prenatal ultrasonography exposure in children with delayed speech. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is an association between prenatal ultrasound exposure and delayed speech in children. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Network of community physicians affiliated with the Primary Care Research Unit, University ... ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Safety Assurance in Obstetrical Ultrasound Safety assurance for diagnostic ultrasound in obstetrics began with a tacit assumption of safety allowed by a federal law enacted in 1976 for then-existing medical ultrasound equipment. The implementation of the 510(k) pre-market approval process for ... ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Is handedness related to health status? Handedness is the most important behavioural asymmetry due to its intimate association with the specialisation of the brain for language. It exists in 3 forms, namely right, left and mixed. Left-handers constitute the biggest minority group in the world ... ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ResearchGate - Temporarily Unavailable researchgate.net
The safety of prenatal ultrasound exposure in human studies - PubMed Diagnostic ultrasound use in obstetrics has been growing rapidly to become an integral part of prenatal care today. The high proportion of exposure to prenatal ultrasound highlights the public health significance of routine ultrasound use. A majority of epidemiologic studies tends to support the saf … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Prenatal Exposure to Ultrasound Affects Learning and Memory in Young Rats Prenatal exposure to ultrasound may cause cognitive impairments in experimental animals; however, the exact mechanisms remain unknown. In this study, … sciencedirect.com
Hemorrhage in murine fetuses exposed to pulsed ultrasound In the late-gestation fetal mouse, exposure to piezoelectric lithotripter fields at amplitudes < 1 MPa produced hemorrhages in tissues near developing… sciencedirect.com
Ob-Gyns Do Too Much Fetal Monitoring It’s important in high-risk pregnancies, but most pregnancies aren’t risky blogs.scientificamerican.com
FDA warns against prenatal portrait studios Despite safety warnings about so-called entertainment ultrasounds from the Food and Drug Administration,  thousands of parents are eager to take advantage of prenatal portraits, the latest trend in baby pictures. nbcnews.com
Safety Assurance in Obstetrical Ultrasound Safety assurance for diagnostic ultrasound in obstetrics began with a tacit assumption of safety allowed by a federal law enacted in 1976 for then-existing medical ultrasound equipment. The implementation of the 510(k) pre-market approval process for ... ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Babygravy9
Posted - February 11, 2024 at 4:33 PM
Saved - February 11, 2024 at 8:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Exposure to phthalates may lead to 56,000 premature births in the US annually, costing $8.1 billion. A study found that higher phthalate exposure was linked to earlier gestational age and lower birth weight. "Safer" alternatives to DEHP were actually worse, doubling the risk of premature births. We need to reconsider our efforts to phase out harmful chemicals.

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

PHTHALATES AND PREMATURE BIRTHS. A new study suggests that exposure to phthalates may be responsible for as many as 56,000 premature births in the USA annually, with added lifetime health costs of $8.1 billion for those children. 👇 https://t.co/cHAmk1AfPp

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

Researchers from the NYU Grossman School of Medicine analysed phthalate exposure in 5,000 American mothers and compared it to gestational age and weight at birth. Higher phthalate exposure was clearly linked to earlier gestational age and lower weight at birth. https://t.co/FikF1oT1pB

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

What's particularly interesting is that they looked at specific kinds of phthalates; in particular metabolites of DEHP and of three compounds that were introduced as "safer" alternatives to DEHP. Guess what? You should know what I'm going to say...

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

The "safer" alternatives turned out to be much worse than DEHP. Where the 10% of mothers with the highest levels of DEHP had a 50% increased risk of giving birth before week 37 of pregnancy compared to women with the lowest 10%, the risk for mothers exposed to the highest...

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

levels of the "safe" alternatives was DOUBLE that of the mothers with the lowest levels. Once again, it turns out we're making the problem worse, not better, in our efforts to phase out harmful chemicals.

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

You can read the study here: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(23)00270-X/fulltext

ClareCraigPath
Posted - February 29, 2024 at 9:12 PM
Saved - March 1, 2024 at 7:45 AM

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

"These 2 cases demonstrate the ability of the COVID-19 vaccine mRNA to penetrate the fetal-placental barrier and to reach the intrauterine environment." For three years pregnant women have been told this is not a risk. https://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378(24)00063-2/fulltext

Babygravy9
Posted - March 23, 2024 at 1:01 PM
Saved - March 23, 2024 at 4:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
New research reveals that excessive exposure to activin A in the womb hinders proper testes development in male fetuses. Surprisingly, SSRIs increase activin A production in women. This study is the first to demonstrate the negative effects of heightened activin A levels caused by endocrine-disrupting substances. The research also found that activin A damages both germ cells and Leydig cells, reducing sperm precursor cells and testosterone production. Maintaining optimal activin A levels is crucial for healthy fetal testis development and future reproductive health outcomes. Studies show that activin A levels significantly increase in pregnant women on antidepressants, yet advice from Johns Hopkins suggests it is safe to take SSRIs during pregnancy.

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

New research has shown that too much exposure to a growth factor called activin A in the womb prevents the proper development of the testes in male fetuses. And what increases activin A production in women? SSRIs. Women are generally told SSRIs are safe during pregnancy. 👇

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

The research, published in Frontiers in Endocrinology, is the first to show that increased exposure to activin A leads to some of the worst effects caused by endocrine-disrupting substances.

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

The researchers showed that elevated activin A not only damages germ cells (sperm precursors) but also the Leydig cells, which produce testosterone in men. "Unusually, germ cells exposed to high activin A frequently contained more than one nucleus (multinucleated—see image below) and were abnormally localized outside of the testis cords, reducing the number of sperm precursor cells at birth by half," one of the researchers said.

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

"We also discovered that several enzymes necessary for steroid production were lower in Leydig cells in these mice, leading to reduced production of the masculinizing factors." "Like the Goldilocks story, too much or too little activin A is detrimental to fetal testis development," the researcher added. "It is important that activin A levels are 'just right' to ensure the correct foundation is built for future reproductive health outcomes."

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

Here's one of many studies showing significant elevation of activin A levels in maternal blood, amniotic fluid and fetal cord blood during pregnant if the mother is on antidepressants. 17.7% of women in the US are on antidepressants.

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

Here's advice from Johns Hopkins saying it's fine to take SSRIs during pregnancy and, in fact, it may be a risk for women to come off them during or before pregnancy.

@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST

Here's a link to the new study: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/endocrinology/articles/10.3389/fendo.2023.1234712/full

Frontiers | Testis exposure to unopposed/elevated activin A in utero affects somatic and germ cells and alters steroid levels mimicking phthalate exposure Correct fetal testis development underpins adult male fertility, and TGFβ superfamily ligands control key aspects of this process. Transcripts encoding one s... frontiersin.org
BGatesIsaPyscho
Posted - April 4, 2024 at 8:17 AM
Saved - April 4, 2024 at 5:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In recent posts, there have been reports of a significant increase in infertility, miscarriages, and abnormal smears. MD Kimberly Biss shares her insights on this matter. Additionally, the author personally knows five individuals who experienced miscarriages shortly after receiving the Covid vaccination, raising concerns about potential depopulation intentions.

@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen

🚨💉 “In our practice we have seen a 50% increase in infertilities” “50% increase in miscarriages” “25% in abnormal smears & cervical miscarriages” Listen to MD Kimberly Biss explain I personally knew 5 people that miscarried within weeks of Covid Vaccination. If there was an evil intention to depopulate the World then this is another way in which you’d do it - by reducing number of births.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I am Kimberly Biss, an OBGYN in Saint Pete, Florida. Since the vaccine rollout, we have seen a 50% decrease in new OB cases (infertility), a 50% increase in miscarriages, and a 25% rise in abnormal Pap Smears and cervical malignancies in our area.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. I'm Kimberly Biss. I'm an OBGYN that practices in Saint Pete, Florida. I can definitely say since the vaccine rollout started, we have seen in our practice a decrease in new OB numbers, which would be infertility by about 50%. We've also seen an increase in miscarriage rate by about 50%. And I would say there's probably about a 25% increase in abnormal Pap Smears, as well as cervical malignancies in our area.
toobaffled
Posted - July 31, 2024 at 10:18 PM
Saved - August 1, 2024 at 12:21 PM

@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”

Dr. Christiane Northrup: Infertility clinics are reporting that the sperm of vaccinated men do not swim. And the eggs of vaccinated women do not grow into embryos. https://t.co/B4bBgY0Wj5

Video Transcript AI Summary
Fertility clinics report unusual issues with sperm and eggs of vaccinated individuals. A study shows an 80% miscarriage rate in women who received the Pfizer vaccine during pregnancy. Reports of menstrual cycle abnormalities, clotting, and even deaths in young girls are emerging. Concerns about potential long-term fertility effects are raised.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This from my colleague, doctor Carrie Made, who's been in touch with fertility clinics. They've never seen anything like it. The sperm of inoculated men does not swim. The eggs of inoculated women do not grow into embryos. And those that do, have a huge amount of contamination with stuff that's non organic. What's going on here? We also know that, according to the first New England Journal of Medicine study saying that Pfizer was safe and effective. This was in June of 2021. If you look at the raw data, it proves that 80% of the women who get the shot in this first and second trimester, basically 0 to 20 weeks, have an 80% miscarriage rate. Now the miscarriage rate just baseline is 1 in 6. It's now 7 to 8 times that much. Doctor James Thorpe points out that there's a 79% increase in fetal malformations. There are unprecedented numbers of stillbirths, but again, this stuff becomes so censored that the the mainstream says, oh, no. You know, that's a lie. You're making that up. We also just published my cycle story with many scientists, including, Doctor. Hooker here, where we had a database of over 6,000 women that came forward because their voices were being silenced. We had a group of about 20,000 women on Facebook who were talking about their experience with their menstrual cycle. They'd never seen anything like it. 90 We're talking clotting. I We're talking clotting. I had women calling me who had been passing clots for weeks weeks. We have 2 there's cases of little girls, 18 month old girls who hemorrhaged and died. In my cycle story. So we had over 6,000 women. Then we looked at the baseline rate of what's called a decidual cast shedding, decidual cast passing a decidual cast. That is where the entire inside of the uterus just is shed all at once as a piece. It looks just like a plaster cast of the inside of the uterus. In our data, as I recall, it was like 269. Women reported this. Most of our original database were women who hadn't even had the shot. It's doing something to the coagulation pathways in the body. That is just the tip of the iceberg. And I keep thinking when these young women realize they will never be able to get pregnant because they had that shot, I mean, the horror of it is unimaginable.
ze_rusty
Posted - September 13, 2024 at 9:43 AM
Saved - September 14, 2024 at 1:29 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that our mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is inherited solely from our mothers, a discovery made by Dr. Doug C. Wallace. The health of mtDNA is influenced by the mother's environment during pregnancy, particularly through a measure called % heteroplasmy. Higher levels of heteroplasmy, often due to stressors like toxins and disrupted light cycles, can lead to earlier aging and disease in children. This may explain the increasing sickness in today's youth compared to previous generations, linking it to our toxic environment and its impact on mitochondrial health.

@ze_rusty - Rusty ⚡️: Solar Powered ☀️

Did you know our Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is inherited exclusively from our mothers? (If you got them from your dad, which is rare, you would very likely get a mitochondrial disease and die an early death) This finding was discovered by the evolutionary biologist Dr. Doug C. Wallace in the 1980s (and mainly conveyed to the masses by Dr @DrJackKruse) This is important because the environment a mother experiences during pregnancy directly affects the mtDNA health of her baby. An important measurement of mtDNA health & function is something called % heterosplasmy. As % heteroplasmy rises in mtDNA due to energy deficiencies caused by the environment, so does the prevalence of genetic mutations leading to progressive aging & diseases. When an expectant mother lives in a stressful environment, marked by disrupted light cycles, toxins, and nnEMF. The baby is born with a higher heteroplasmy rate. This means the baby’s mtDNA could function like that of a much older person, leading to earlier aging and disease. This may explain why children today are getting sicker compared to previous generations, due to our increasingly toxic environments. This means that although at birth the baby is physically 0 years old, biologically speaking, their mtDNA may be born as a 40 year old and thus aging and disease will manifest sooner than that of a baby born with a low heteroplasmy rate. This is why our children are becoming more and more sick today when compared to previous generations. This is because humanity has created a chronically toxic environment. The brain, the heart and the immune system contain the most mitochondria in the body (oocytes or female egg cells contain 100,000 mitochondria in each cell) Is it a coincidence that heart disease, neurodegeneration and autoimmune diseases are booming? Could it be related to high % heteroplasmy rates in our mtDNA? If you look into Kruse's work, you'll realise that's the case.

MidwesternDoc
Posted - December 23, 2024 at 9:56 AM
Saved - December 24, 2024 at 2:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 1993, CNN highlighted the dangers of pregnancy ultrasounds, prompting the FDA to acknowledge these risks. Despite this, the FDA increased the maximum allowable ultrasound dose significantly, ignoring the potential harm. Ultrasound can cause various injuries to fetuses, including genetic damage, organ impairment, and even fetal death. Studies have linked ultrasound to miscarriages, infertility, and developmental delays, with no evidence of improved pregnancy outcomes. Instead, it often leads to increased anxiety and unnecessary interventions for parents. I've compiled over 200 studies supporting these findings.

@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor

In 1993 CNN warned against pregnancy ultrasound and had the FDA admit it was aware of its dangers. Remarkably, the FDA raised the maximum allowable ultrasound dose by 8 times (despite data showing the old dose was too high) and all those dangers were forgotten. Ultrasound causes a dose dependent injury to the organs and cells that fetuses are particularly susceptible to (especially early in life when ultrasounds have no medical value). Those harms include: •Genetic damage, significant damage to cellular structures (e.g., mitochondria, microtubules and the nucleus). •Initiating programmed cell death. •In mice and monkeys, significantly impaired learning, memory, activity, and sociability. •Fetal death. •Hemorrhages. •A wide range of congenital malformations. The Chinese in turn conducted a series of studies showing the low doses of ultrasound created those injuries in the placenta, pituitary gland, eyes, immune system, kidneys, liver, ovaries, testicles (and sperm), and the brain’s neurons and glial cells. Additionally, in humans, ultrasound has also been linked to miscarriages, premature ovulation, male infertility, fetal growth restrictions, altered neurological function, developmental delays. Conversely, ultrasound has not been proven to improve pregnancy outcomes (rather it just leads to more frequent C-sections, prenatal testing, anxiety for the parents, abortions and neonatal distress) Rather, all it can do most of the time is (sometimes erroneously) tell parents to abort their baby or subject it to invasive (and harmful tests), all of which creates immense unnecessary anxiety and anguish for the parents. I complied the 200+ studies proving all of this in the article below.

Video Transcript AI Summary
New pregnant women often consider ultrasound scans, which use high-frequency sound waves to create images of the fetus. While doctors generally deem ultrasound safe, concerns are emerging about potential long-term risks, including genetic damage and low birth weight. Some studies suggest ultrasound may cause subtle birth defects and affect fetal development, although no overt malformations have been detected. Experts urge caution, noting that ultrasound is often overused, with many low-risk pregnancies receiving scans unnecessarily. The FDA acknowledges it cannot guarantee ultrasound safety, and ongoing research is needed to understand its effects on human fetuses. Overall, while ultrasound is a valuable tool, its routine use should be reconsidered until more is known about its long-term implications.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey. New pregnant women think twice today about getting an ultrasound scan. Even lady Diana had one and found she's going to have a boy. It's an instant moving picture of the fetus made by high frequency sound waves. You can see the baby's heartbeat, spinal column, skull, even the tiny valves of the heart. Doctors call ultrasound a new medical wonder, a way to spot birth defects, improper growth, and problems that may interfere with birth. Ultrasound is a type of radiation. But unlike x rays, ultrasound is called non ionizing. That's what makes doctors almost universally believe it's absolutely safe. That unlike x rays, it causes no damage to the fetus. Speaker 1: I do not tell my patients that there's a potential harm because I do not feel there is evidence that there is a potential harm. Speaker 0: But a CNN investigation reveals growing evidence that ultrasound is not entirely harmless. Some scientists and government officials are concerned that it may be dangerous over the long term. They fear ultrasound is grossly overused on pregnant women, may harm the fetus, and should be limited until they find out whether their suspicions are true. Here's what they say may be the problem. Genetic damage to the fetus that could persist for generations, possibly cancer and subtle birth defects that might not show up for years. Speaker 2: But, potentially, it can produce damage to the genetic material, and some of these early studies are suggesting that there is in fact damage induced by diagnostic levels of ultrasound in human and, little rodent cells. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Mhmm. Speaker 2: So our concern is growing. Speaker 0: Doctor Arthur Bloom is a renowned geneticist at Columbia University and an expert on radiation. Speaker 2: If it becomes established that ultrasound is in fact a mutagen, it would also, and most importantly perhaps, or at least equally as important, raise the question as to whether or not it is a cancer causing agent because a very high percentage of agents that are mutagenic are also carcinogenic. We're not suggesting on the basis of the evidence that there is a major effect of ultrasound in terms of doubling the rate of birth defects or anything of the sort. We're simply saying that there may be a low level effect there that's increasing the rate of congenital malformations, that we may never be able to detect on clinical grounds. Speaker 0: Doctor Bloom and other experts stress that so far they have no evidence ultrasound radiation causes harm in human fetuses, but they say we should avoid routine ultrasound examination because we're beginning to see signs of danger, warning signs that in the past predicted medical disaster. One early warning sign is genetic damage to cells in test tubes. We're now seeing this for the first time from low levels of ultrasound. Next, harm to laboratory animals. This too is showing up. Another clue is evidence in humans that something may be wrong. Now, a new government study not yet released does indicate that the unborn exposed to ultrasound weigh less at birth. That's a significant signal, experts say, that ultrasound may interfere with normal development. The one thing scientists do not suggest they're finding is blatant deformities of the type caused by potent drugs like thalidomide. Speaker 3: We do not detect any congenital malformations after ultrasound. So whatever we're doing, we're doing something extremely subtle if anything at all. Mhmm. Speaker 0: What you're saying is that you detect no overt crimes of malformations the way we think of them as deformed limbs or missing foot or, Speaker 3: missing organs. Speaker 0: The main researcher who has triggered new concern about ultrasound is doctor Doreen Leibiscond, a radiologist at Albert Einstein College of Medicine. She exposes animal and human cells to ultrasound waves. She finds abnormal changes in the way the cells look and behave. She won't say the cells are genetically damaged, but she does say the changes look the same as damage caused to cells by 29 rads of ionizing radiation or x rays. That's the equivalent of about 250 chest x rays. Here's how normal cells look without ultrasound, growing apart from each other in neat rows. Here's how they look after ultrasound, a tangled mass growing wildly all over each other. Here are other normal cells in motion with smooth edges moving in a clear direction. After ultrasound, 100% of them become phonetic and distorted. Speaker 3: Things are happening. They're happening to the DNA of these cells. They're happening to the behavior. They're beginning to grow in a funny way. They're beginning to behave in a in a barren fashion. And in some cases, they're becoming tumor cells. There are some long lived effects on the DNA of the cells and the behavior of the cells and on the cell growth that persists in many, many generations after a single exposure. Mhmm. Speaker 0: In fact, as I recall in, your papers, you were showing that you had effects after 10 generations. Speaker 3: Yes. And even longer than that Speaker 0: Doctor Bloom says it looks as if ultrasound causes genetic mutations. Speaker 2: If a chemical were doing that, we would call that a mutagen. Speaker 0: Government officials are well aware of and also concerned about doctor Leiboskin's findings. Food and Drug Administration officials candidly admit they cannot say diagnostic ultrasound during pregnancy is safe. No. I don't think FDA can say Speaker 4: I don't think anybody can say that ultrasound is absolutely safe. Speaker 0: In fact, the FDA for several years has been worried about the effects of ultrasound and done much research on it. In these tanks, they expose pregnant mice to low levels of ultrasound. They find that the offspring of mice who get ultrasound weigh less when born. More important, CNN has learned the FDA has just finished a new study on pregnant women monitored by ultrasound. Speaker 4: We've been looking at a population of children of about 2,000 children who have been irradiated, about half of whom have been irradiated in the Denver, Colorado area. And the, indication there is that those children that have been irradiated have a reduced birth weight. Speaker 0: Low birth weight may not sound very serious, but in some cases it's another word for premature. And premature babies more commonly suffer brain damage and mental retardation and are much less likely to survive. Doctor Bloom says confirmed evidence that ultrasound produces low weight babies would be serious cause for alarm. Speaker 2: Could represent the effect of ultrasound slowing down the rate of cellular growth and maturation. And if that's the case, clearly, that's a very undesirable effect. If that were proven to be the case in humans, I think it would really put the brakes right on the use of this of this procedure for routine monitoring. We dance. Yes. I definitely do. Speaker 0: Doctor Harold Fox, an obstetrician also at Columbia University says there's no need for restrictions on ultrasound. He believes warnings about the technique would scare the public unnecessarily. Speaker 1: Alright. The public often becomes very scared, really anxious, petrified in one sense or another. And I think it's absolutely inappropriate to apply that kind of a warning technique to diagnostic folks. And I think Speaker 0: None of the experts we talked with wanted to abolish ultrasound for pregnant women, but they believe it's overused often frivolously. For example, just to see the baby. Speaker 2: Our general feeling is that the use of ultrasound ultrasound to monitor pregnancies that have a clear risk of some kind of birth defect or some kind of pregnancy problem that that sort of use is appropriate. In other words, where the pregnancy is a so called high risk pregnancy, The danger that I see is that ultrasound is now being used for the routine monitoring of many pregnancies that have no particular risks and no particular problems. Speaker 0: Doctor Bloom says only 20% of the pregnant women are high risk and need ultrasound, yet more than 50% now get it. That's quite a dramatic overuse. Speaker 2: Yes. I think it is. I think it is. Speaker 0: We would have, certainly, more than a 1000000 women getting it we probably don't need it Speaker 2: That's correct. Speaker 0: Right now. Speaker 2: That's correct. Speaker 0: What scientists and officials are saying is that they really don't know whether ultrasound is dangerous to human fetuses, but they have new clues that suggest we should go easy on its use until we know more because overuse today is not worth the risk of long term terrible genetic effects in the future. Speaker 3: When a female fetus is born, all her ova, in other words, all the eggs in the next generation are present at the time of birth and therefore, when you subject a female fetus to ultrasound near term, you have not only subjected her cells to ultrasound, but also all her eggs for this next generation. Speaker 0: Jean Carper, CNN, Atlanta. Speaker 5: The ultrasound radiation described in this report is widely used in American obstetrics today. Ultrasound is used in 3 types of devices. The first is the ultrasound scan. The second, the ultrasound stethoscope or doptone, often used in place of a real stethoscope at prenatal visits and in labor. The third device is the external electronic fetal monitor, often used for many hours in late pregnancy or in labor. You can identify an ultrasound device by the necessity to use a gel to conduct the radiation from the device to your skin. Regular stethoscopes do not use a conductive gel. For more information, see the Journal of Nurse Midwifery, July August 1984 issue. Speaker 6: Doris here, president of the American Foundation For Maternal and Child Health. You're about to see a film or actually a tape that was produced by Gene Carper for Cable News Network entitled Fetal Effects of Ultrasound. It's a particularly important tape because it documents the growing concern regarding the safety of ultrasound when used in obstetric care. These findings have a relationship to the use of ultrasound when it is used in the form of a duct tone, for a sonogram, and for electronic fetal monitoring. Neither the National Institutes of Health, the World Health Organization, or the International Federation of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has recommended that ultrasound be used routinely in obstetric care. While many physicians contend that the fact that ultrasound has been used over a 20 year period would justify its use as a safe modality, The fact is that there is not a single control study today that is looking into the long term effects of ultrasound on human development. I introduce the fetal effects of ultrasound.
VigilantFox
Posted - April 5, 2025 at 10:07 PM
Saved - April 5, 2025 at 11:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve uncovered alarming information about prenatal ultrasounds that challenges their perceived safety. Historical practices, like using X-rays in the early 1900s, were abandoned due to severe risks, yet ultrasounds have taken their place without sufficient scrutiny. Research shows they can cause serious harm to developing fetuses, including brain damage and genetic mutations, often at doses lower than current FDA limits. Despite these risks, ultrasounds are routinely used, driven by a desire to medicalize childbirth and profit. It’s crucial for expecting parents to be informed.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Shocking Truth About Pregnancy’s Most Common Procedure In 1983, even CNN warned that prenatal ultrasounds could HARM your baby. The FDA admitted the risk—then quietly raised the “safe” ultrasound dose by 800%. It turns out that ultrasounds cause a dose-dependent injury to developing fetal tissues, making early-stage exposure especially risky. All those dangers were buried. But @MidwesternDoc has compiled over 200 peer-reviewed studies showing what ultrasounds can do to the brain, heart, reproductive organs, and more. This research might just blow your mind. 🧵 THREAD

Video Transcript AI Summary
A CNN investigation reveals growing concern among scientists and government officials that ultrasound may not be entirely harmless and is potentially overused on pregnant women. They fear possible genetic damage to the fetus, potentially leading to cancer and subtle birth defects that might not appear for years. Geneticist Dr. Arthur Bloom notes early studies suggest diagnostic levels of ultrasound can damage human and rodent cells. Radiologist Dr. Doreen Rebiskind's research shows ultrasound exposure causes abnormal changes in cells, behaving similarly to cells damaged by X-rays. FDA officials admit they cannot definitively say diagnostic ultrasound during pregnancy is safe. An FDA study indicates that children exposed to ultrasound in utero have reduced birth weights. Experts suggest ultrasound should not be used for routine monitoring of low-risk pregnancies. Dr. Bloom estimates that over a million women receive unnecessary ultrasounds. There is concern that subjecting a female fetus to ultrasound near term could affect not only her cells but also all her eggs for the next generation. Ultrasound is used in scans, Doppler fetal monitors, and electronic fetal monitors. No controlled studies exist on the long-term effects of ultrasound on human development.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: New pregnant women think twice today about getting an ultrasound scan. Even Lady Diana had one and found she's going to have a boy. It's an instant moving picture of the fetus made by high frequency sound waves. You can see the baby's heartbeat, spinal column, skull, even the tiny valves of the heart. Doctors call ultrasound a new medical wonder. A way to spot birth defects, improper growth, and problems that may interfere with birth. Ultrasound is a type of radiation, but unlike x rays, ultrasound is called non ionizing. That's what makes doctors almost universally believe it's absolutely safe. That unlike x rays, it causes no damage to the fetus. Speaker 1: I do not tell my patients that there's a potential harm because I do not feel there is evidence that there is a potential harm. Speaker 0: But a CNN investigation reveals growing evidence that ultrasound is not entirely harmless. Some scientists and government officials are concerned that it may be dangerous over the long term. They fear ultrasound is grossly overused on pregnant women, may harm the fetus and should be limited until they find out whether their suspicions are true. Here's what they say may be the problem. Genetic damage to the fetus that could persist for generations, possibly cancer and subtle birth defects that might not show up for years. Speaker 2: But potentially it can produce damage to the genetic material and some of these early studies are suggesting that there is in fact damage induced by diagnostic levels of ultrasound in human and little rodent cells. So our concern is growing. Speaker 0: Doctor. Arthur Bloom is a renowned geneticist at Speaker 2: Columbia University and an expert on radiation. If it becomes established that ultrasound is in fact a mutagen, it would also, and most importantly perhaps, or at least equally as important, raise the question as to whether or not it is a cancer causing agent, because a very high percentage of agents that are mutagenic are also carcinogenic. I'm not suggesting on the basis of the evidence that there is a major effect of ultrasound in terms of doubling the rate of birth defects or anything of the sort. We're simply saying that there may be a low level effect there that's increasing the rate of congenital malformations that we may never be able to detect on clinical grounds. Speaker 0: Doctor. Blum and other experts stress that so far they have no evidence ultrasound radiation causes harm in human fetuses. But they say we should avoid routine ultrasound examination because we're beginning to see signs of danger. Warning signs that in the past predicted medical disaster. One early warning sign is genetic damage to cells in test tubes. We're now seeing this for the first time from low levels of ultrasound. Next, harm to laboratory animals. This too is showing up. Another clue is evidence in humans that something may be wrong. Now, a new government study, not yet released, does indicate the unborn exposed to ultrasound weigh less at birth. That's a significant signal experts say that ultrasound may interfere with normal development. The one thing scientists do not suggest they're finding is blatant deformities of the type caused by potent drugs like thalidomide. Speaker 3: We do not detect any congenital malformations after ultrasound, so whatever we're doing, we're doing something extremely subtle with anything at all. Speaker 0: What you're saying is that you detect no overt kinds of malformations the way we think of them as deformed limbs or a missing Speaker 3: foot Missing organs. Speaker 0: The main researcher who has triggered new concern about ultrasound is Doctor. Doreen Rebiskind, a radiologist at Albert Einstein College of Medicine. She exposes animal and human cells to ultrasound waves. She finds abnormal changes in the way the cells look and behave. She won't say the cells are genetically damaged, but she does say the changes look the same as damage caused to cells by 29 rads of ionizing radiation or x rays. That's the equivalent of about two fifty chest x rays. Here's how normal cells look without ultrasound, growing apart from each other in neat rows. Here's how they look after ultrasound, a tangled mass growing wildly all over each other. Here are other normal cells in motion with smooth edges moving in a clear direction. After ultrasound, one hundred percent of them become phonetic and distorted. Speaker 3: Things are happening. They're happening to the DNA of these cells. They're happening to the behavior. They're beginning to grow in a funny way. They're beginning to behave in an aberrant fashion. And in some cases, they're becoming tumor cells. There are some long lived effects on the DNA of the cells, on the behavior of the cells, on the cell growth that persist for many, many generations after a single exposure. Speaker 0: In fact, as I recall in your papers, were showing that you had effects after 10 generations. Speaker 3: Yes, and even longer than that. Speaker 0: Doctor Bloom says it looks as if ultrasound causes genetic mutations. Speaker 2: If a chemical were doing that, we would call that a mutagen. Speaker 0: Government officials are well aware of and also concerned about Doctor. Lebeskin's findings. Food and Drug Administration officials candidly admit they cannot say diagnostic ultrasound during pregnancy is safe. Speaker 4: No, I don't think FDA can say. I don't think anybody can say that ultrasound is absolutely safe. Speaker 0: In fact, the FDA for several years has been worried about the effects of ultrasound and done much research on it. In these tanks they expose pregnant mice to low levels of ultrasound. They find that the offspring of mice who get ultrasound weigh less when born. More important, CNN has learned the FDA has just finished a new study on pregnant women monitored by ultrasound. Speaker 4: We've been looking at a population of children, about 2,000 children, who have been irradiated, about half of whom have been irradiated in the Denver, Colorado area. And the indication there is that those children that have been irradiated have a reduced birth weight. Speaker 0: Low birth weight may not sound very serious, but in some cases it's another word for premature, and premature babies more commonly suffer brain damage and mental retardation and are much less likely to survive. Doctor. Broome says confirmed evidence that ultrasound produces low weight babies would be serious cause for alarm. Speaker 2: Could represent the effect of ultrasound slowing down the rate of cellular growth and maturation. And if that's the case, clearly that's a very undesirable effect. If that were proven to be the case in humans, I think it would really put the brakes right on the use of this procedure for routine monitoring. You do? Yes, I do. Definitely do. Speaker 0: Doctor. Harold Fox, an obstetrician, also at Columbia University, says there's no need for restrictions on ultrasound. He believes warnings about the technique would scare the public unnecessarily. Speaker 1: Alright, the public often becomes very scared, worried, anxious, petrified in one sense or another, and I think it's absolutely inappropriate to apply that kind of a warning technique to diagnostic ultrasound. Speaker 0: One of the experts we talked with wanted to abolish ultrasound for pregnant women, but they believe it's overused, often frivolously. For example, just to see the baby. Speaker 2: Our general feeling is that the use of ultrasound to monitor pregnancies that have a clear risk of some kind of birth defect or some kind of pregnancy problem, that that sort of use is appropriate. In other words, where the pregnancy is a so called high risk pregnancy. The danger that I see is that ultrasound is now being used for the routine monitoring of many pregnancies that have no particular risks and no particular problems. Speaker 0: Doctor Bloom says only twenty percent of the pregnant women are high risk and need ultrasound, yet more than fifty percent now get it. That's quite a dramatic overuse. Speaker 2: Yes, yes, I think it is, I think it is. Speaker 0: We would have certainly more than a million women getting it who probably don't need Speaker 2: it Speaker 0: right That's correct. What scientists and officials are saying is that they really don't know whether ultrasound is dangerous to human fetuses. But they have new clues that suggest we should go easy on its use until we know more because overuse today is not worth the risk of long term terrible genetic effects in the future. Speaker 3: When a female fetus is born, all her ova, in other words, all the eggs for the next generation are present at the time of birth, and therefore when you subject a female fetus to ultrasound near term, you have not only subjected her cells to ultrasound, but also all her eggs for the next generation. Speaker 0: Gene Carper, CNN, Atlanta. Speaker 5: The ultrasound radiation described in this report is widely used in American obstetrics today. Ultrasound is used in three types of devices. The first is the ultrasound scan, the second the ultrasound stethoscope or DOPTONE, often used in place of a real stethoscope at prenatal visits and in labor. The third device is the external electronic fetal monitor, often used for many hours in late pregnancy or in labor. You can identify an ultrasound device by the necessity to use a gel to conduct the radiation from the device to your skin. Regular stethoscopes do not use a conductive gel. For more information see the Journal of Nurse Midwifery, July August nineteen eighty four issue. Speaker 6: Doris here, President of the American Foundation for Maternal and Child Health. You're about to see a film, or actually a tape, that was produced by Gene Carper for Cable News Network entitled Fetal Effects of Ultrasound. It's a particularly important tape because it documents the growing concern regarding the safety of ultrasound when used in obstetric care. These findings have a relationship to the use of ultrasound when it is used in the form of a doptone, for sonogram and for electronic fetal monitoring. Neither the National Institutes of Health, the World Health Organization, or the International Federation of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has recommended that ultrasound be used routinely in obstetric care. While many physicians contend that the fact that ultrasound has been used over a twenty year period would justify its use as a safe modality, the fact is that there is not a single control study today that is looking into the long term effects of ultrasound on human development. I introduce the fetal effects of ultrasound.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

To really understand what happened here, we need to start at the very beginning. In the early 1900s, pregnant women were routinely given X-rays as part of prenatal care. That is until the link to leukemia and birth defects became undeniable. In the 1970s, after decades of work to stop the practice, the medical system finally responded. But it seems they only waited until they could swap in something new, claiming it was “safe and effective”. Prenatal ultrasound.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Except ultrasounds aren’t as safe as you’re told. They send powerful sound waves into the womb, where the developing fetus is most vulnerable. And the earlier in development, the greater the risk. That’s when the brain, heart, organs, and DNA are forming.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Check out this long-forgotten interview with courageous physician Robert S. Mendelsohn for more on that.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Diagnostic ultrasound may pose dangers, despite doctors claiming there is no proof. Experimental studies allegedly show ultrasound can damage a child's biochemistry and immune system, and delay central nervous system maturation. According to the Oxford Child Cancer Study, there is an excess incidence of leukemia in children born to mothers exposed to diagnostic ultrasound during pregnancy. Ultrasound has replaced X-rays, which were previously linked to leukemia. Doctors may expose mothers to ultrasound without their knowledge or consent in four instances: using a Doppler stethoscope to hear the baby's heartbeat (continuous wave ultrasound), during ultrasound scans to view the baby's organs (intermittent wave ultrasound), guiding needles during amniocentesis, and during fetal monitoring. Mothers are encouraged to research ultrasound dangers, referencing government publications like the HHS's "Ultrasound Overview."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thanks to the media today, a lot of people are aware of the dangers of diagnostic ultrasound. Now the doctor doesn't tell you any of those dangers. Instead, he says to you, There is no proof that ultrasound is dangerous. But if people have access to the same information that doctors do, they will learn that there are at least a dozen experimental studies that show damage from ultrasound, including damage to the biochemistry of the child, damage to the immune system, and delayed maturation of the central nervous system. The human studies, have been carried out by Doctor. Alice Stewart of the Oxford Child Cancer Study, now reveal in the five year follow ups an excess incidence of leukemia in children born to mothers who were exposed to diagnostic ultrasound during their pregnancy. The reason why that is important is because today ultrasound has replaced x rays during pregnancy. Doctors used to do x-ray palvimetry until mothers found out that those x rays led to an excess incidence of leukemia in their later born children. Now a mother says to a doctor, Doctor, you're not going to x-ray me, are you? And the doctor says, Oh no, we don't do x rays anymore. We use ultrasound. And the mother then says to the doctor, Well, what is ultrasound? And the obstetrician says, Oh, you don't have to worry about ultrasound, that's what they use to detect submarines. Which always interests me because what the hell do obstetricians know about submarines? So I recommend to every mother that she find out as much as she can, if necessary, from the government pamphlets. There is a wonderful government publication put out by the Department of HHS called Ultrasound Overview, which gives many of the important studies about the dangers of ultrasound. I also recommend that every mother recognize that the doctor gets four chances to give her baby ultrasound, that is her baby in utero ultrasound, without telling her. The first opportunity the doctor takes is when he says to the mother, Don't you want to hear the baby's heartbeat? And he uses the Doppler Doptone stethoscope. And he doesn't tell the mother that that is a source of continuous wave ultrasound. The second time is when he uses the scan, the ultrasound scan. He takes a picture and he says to the mother, Don't you want to see the baby's sexual organs? And he doesn't tell her that that is intermittent wave ultrasound. Later, if he talks the mother into an amniocentesis, he does not tell the mother that he guides the needle, the amniocentesis, that is put through her abdomen and into the fluid surrounding the baby with the use of ultrasound. And finally, at the end of delivery, when he carries out fetal monitoring, either externally by strapping the mother with those leather straps, or internally by taking that metallic device and screwing it into the scalp of the baby before the baby even emerges from the birth canal, those are both forms of ultrasound. So the average woman, the average mother going into a hospital today to have her baby can be sure that she is going to get exposed to ultrasound several times during her pregnancy.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

A slew of animal studies have shown shocking results that every parent-to-be needs to know. Ultrasound has been shown to cause: • Fetal death • Brain damage • Skull hemorrhages • Genetic mutations • Cleft palate • Heart defects • Lifelong developmental delays Disturbingly, many of these occurred at ultrasound doses far lower than what the FDA allows today.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

This report by @MidwesternDoc reviews the body of literature on the risks and benefits of prenatal ultrasound, alternatives to it, and strategies for pregnant mothers that are helpful to ensure a healthy and vibrant child. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-forgotten-dangers-of-ultrasound

The Forgotten Dangers of Ultrasound What no one tells you about having a healthy pregnancy midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Despite the growing safety concerns, in 1992, the FDA raised the “maximum allowable dose”. By 800%. This increase was not based on any new safety data. It was based on nothing but a desire for clearer images and to further medicalize childbirth. Oh, and to grow a billion-dollar industry.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc As if by magic, the research into the harms of prenatal ultrasound vanished. Funding dried up. Critical studies were buried. And soon, doctors were trained to believe that it was perfectly safe. “Safe and effective.” “Safe and effective.” But it wasn’t.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

In the late 1980s, researchers in China ran a series of studies that would never be done in the West. They provided definitive proof that ultrasound is not safe during pregnancy. By studying large numbers of aborted fetuses, they found direct damage to: • Brain neurons • Eye tissue • Kidneys • Testicles • Ovaries • Placenta • Pituitary gland • Immune and endocrine systems All this from a simple diagnostic-level ultrasound performed just prior to abortion.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc So if prenatal ultrasound is so risky, there must be major benefits to its use… right? Nope. Despite what expecting parents are told, prenatal ultrasound has never been proven to improve birth outcomes. It’s actually the opposite.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Ultrasound doesn’t treat. It’s a diagnostic tool. For when there’s something to diagnose. Where have we seen this before? And in many cases, it leads to overdiagnosis—or mistaken diagnosis—resulting in harm to the baby, the mother, or both.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses her miscarriage, which occurred two to four hours after an ultrasound at five and a half to six weeks of pregnancy. An RN told her she was the sixth person recently to miscarry after an ultrasound. Research led her to a study where pregnant women received two or more ultrasound scans. One study divided over 9,000 women into two groups. The first group received an ultrasound scan between sixteen and twenty weeks, and the second group received no ultrasound scan. The results showed 20 miscarriages in the first ultrasound group and none in the second group. She believes ultrasounds are not worth the risk, and that many times, if a scan sees something wrong, babies are born completely normal anyway. She advises being patient and trusting baby movement. She encourages viewers to consider not getting ultrasounds or using Dopplers, and to check out the links she listed below.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So this video is about my experience with ultrasound and how an ultrasound killed my baby. So not this baby. I am pregnant again, seventeen weeks pregnant and everything is going good as far as I know. I can feel movement and everything. But last December, I miscarried a baby about two to four hours after an ultrasound. And so I'm just gonna share a little, like, my experience with it and, just some research I've done as well about ultrasound and Dopplers. Anyway, so what happened was last December, I found out I was pregnant and I was so excited. I was going home for Christmas in about two or three weeks, so I was like I quickly want to get an ultrasound so I can hear so I can see the heartbeat, so that I can tell everybody because I'm so excited. And, so, anyway, I was about five and a half, six weeks pregnant, and I just went to my doctor because I was like, I want to get, like, a referral to get an ultrasound. But when I got there, he's like, oh, I actually have an ultrasound machine in my office that we can use. And so what we did is we just right there laid down and he did ultrasound on my stomach and we saw the baby and because his machine wasn't that great, like it wasn't very clear, you couldn't like you could see the baby like attached to my uterine wall, but you couldn't see a heartbeat or anything because he said his machine was not very good. So anyway, I said okay, well I have my appointment tomorrow for a real ultrasound at the hospital like a better one should I still go to it or do you think that it's not far long enough that they'll see anything? He's like well their machine's better so they might see something it's up to you if you want to go And then that night, I was at work and I mean, I waitressed. It's not like You fell. Yeah. You fell. I was waitressing and it wasn't like doing like heavy heavy lifting or anything. Just like regular trays and blah blah. But I went to the bathroom at work and I noticed blood and I was like freaking out and like oh crap nothing miscarriage or something's going on. So I went home and then that night everything just started getting worse. I started cramping. Full on not like I didn't miscarry that night but everything like was cramping and it was starting to happen. And so anyway, I was, like, crying all night, up worried, and I went to the hospital immediately in the morning. I was like, I don't care. I'm not waiting for my appointment. I'm just gonna go to the emergency and see what's going on. So but by the time I got to the hospital, it was time for my appointment anyway. So when I got there, they checked me in right away and she looked, did like a regular ultrasound and she's like, I can't see anything. Like, there's nothing in there. Because I told her I was bleeding and everything. And when I looked over at the monitor, it looked like this is so weird, and I don't know much about like how you interpret the screens, but I just looked like there was little like debris in my uterus. Like it didn't look like there was anything in there. And so anyway then she's like well let me do a transvaginal ultrasound and see if I can see anything. So then she did that and didn't see anything either. She's like, I'm sorry. I think you are miscarrying. And she's like, can go to the emergency if you want and they'll help you there. You can just go home and miscarry. So I just went home. So I was like, I don't wanna sit in the emergency for hours for them to tell me, you're miscarrying. Go home. So anyway, I just went home and then that night, in the middle of the night, I had like intense cramping and like back pain and fever and then I passed the baby that night. So anyway that was really really devastating and I honestly didn't think anything about the ultrasound at all. I was just like oh it must have miscarried you know happens to people whatever. But then I spoke to someone who I know who was an RN and they told me that they were like, oh, she had an ultrasound? They're like, I'm not joking. You are the sixth person who has told me recently that they miscarried right after an ultrasound. Like, I'm not joking. That's actually what people keep coming up to and saying. They're like, just had an ultrasound, miscarried a day later kind of thing. And so I was like, oh my gosh. Could it have been the ultrasound? And I just felt so guilty. Like, is it my fault? Like, I I was rushing to get this so early on in pregnancy. It must have been too much for the baby. I it killed the baby. And so I was just devastated, but I still didn't know if that was, true or not. So anyway, I did some research online, and it came up with with some article talking about how ultrasound on Doppler can be pretty dangerous. And, I'll put the link below to some of the articles I read. But I just want to talk about quickly a study that was done, because a lot of the studies have been done on like animals and people are like, well, it's not the same with an animal as a person, so you can't say that it really caused a miscarriage. But here's a study done with people. And so this was three separate studies. Pregnant women received two or more ultrasound scans during pregnancy. In one of the studies, a large randomized controlled trial, over 9,000 women were divided randomly into two groups. The members of the first group received an ultrasound scan between sixteen and twenty weeks. So that's pretty far along in pregnancy. It's not even early, that early. The members of the second group received no ultrasound scan. The results of the study revealed that there were 20 miscarriages in the first ultrasound group and none in the second group. I'm like yeah. That means that twenty out of the four thousand five hundred women who had miscarried, and then out of the ones other four thousand five hundred who had no ultrasound, none of them miscarried. I'm like, oh my gosh, that is enough evidence to me. And it's like, oh, well, that's only 20 people. Like, you're gonna worry about twenty out of nine thousand? I'm like, just think of it this way. Think about if there's someone that are like, okay. I am gonna put you in front of a gunman. I'm gonna take 4,500 people, and only 20 of you are gonna get shot in the head and killed. Do you wanna be in that group of 4,500? No freaking thanks. I don't wanna be in that group, and neither does your baby. So honestly, like, it pisses me off so much. Like, I get it. There are times in pregnancy where people, like, said ultrasound has saved their baby. And I'm like, that's great. That's awesome. I'm sure it has been useful in so many ways as well. But to me, the fact that twenty out of forty five hundred babies died because of the ultrasound scan, it's not worth the risk. Like, back in the day when ultrasound didn't exist, women were just fine. Like, be patient. Like, you're if you feel your baby move, it's most likely okay. And you know what? If you get the scan and they see something's wrong with the baby, you know what? A lot of times, it is wrong, and the babies are born completely normal. No birth defects. It just freaks women out. They're like, oh my gosh. Your baby's gonna have Down syndrome. Your baby has all these problems, and then the baby comes out, it's fine. And you know what? And what if it did have those problems? Oh, no. Now you get to stress your entire freaking pregnancy worrying that oh my gosh, how am I gonna deal with this baby that has all these issues? Or you can be like everyone else did in the past, have your baby, realize there's issues, and deal with it as it comes. And guess what? You probably won't be so friggin stressed from being stressed your whole pregnancy. So, anyway, this subject just pisses me off now, so I'm a little heated up about it. But, anyway, please please consider not getting an ultrasound. And Dopplers use the exact same technology, and I've heard studies about them as well. So just be patient. When you feel your baby move, yes, you know everything's okay. If you have all the signs of pregnancy, I'm pretty sure everything's okay. And you know what? If you miscarry, you miscarry. That's part of life. It freaking sucks, but at least you know that you didn't contribute to causing it. Like, anyway. So check out the links below that I listed. Thanks for listening to my story. And a really great group, I just want to say, for any women who are pregnant is on Facebook. It's called, like, Vegan Pregnancy and Parenting. I just saw somebody ask this question the other day or today actually about should they get an ultrasound? They've heard bad things about it and I cannot believe how many people in there are sharing like their experiences and saying don't get it like I'm the only one who actually said I had a miscarriage right after but tons of other people are like no don't do it there's so many risks. So it's nice to know that there are people out there that think about it and don't just listen to everything they're told by their doctors because a lot of these things aren't researched that well. People are like, it creates jobs, blah blah blah, let's keep going with it. But you know what? They learn later that x-ray is bad for you. I mean, the guy who freaking created x-ray died from cancer or something. I don't know. So anyway, the rant is over, but check out the links below. I know I'm gonna get a lot of criticism on this video, but I honestly don't care because to me, if I save a few babies lives, I'm happy. So I'm just gonna end this video, but yeah, share this video with anyone you know who might be interested or who you think you should show it to. But anyway thanks for watching guys and if you like this video give it a thumbs up and subscribe to my channel. Okay bye!

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The harms associated with prenatal ultrasound are disturbing. Your doctor probably did warn you. Your doctor probably doesn’t even know. • Studies have linked ultrasound to: • Fetal growth restriction • Altered brain development • Speech delay • Autism risk in genetically vulnerable babies

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

In addition to harming the fetus itself, studies show ultrasounds: • Lead to more false positives that lead to unnecessary interventions • Increase C-section rates • Cause the mother unnecessary anxiety • Push parents toward abortion • Cause premature labor and miscarriage

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc So why do we do this? Why do most women receive multiple ultrasounds during pregnancy? The medicalization of the incredibly natural process of childbirth. And to grow a billion-dollar industry.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Expecting parents have been taken advantage of for years. They’re ripe for exploitation. Especially first-time parents. Bringing a new life into the world is a big deal. It can feel daunting and scary. You don’t want to make a mistake. Through generations of targeting, we’ve been disarmed. Led to believe that we don’t know what’s best and that we can’t do anything without the guidance of an authority, especially when it comes to bringing a new life into the world.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

But this isn’t true. Childbirth is a natural and generally safe process. If humans were unable to give birth without modern medicine, we wouldn’t have been here to invent modern medicine. Birth isn’t a medical condition. It’s a natural part of life. The overmedicalization of birth isn’t to protect mom or baby—it’s to protect physicians from liability. And to make money.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Just like with vaccines, early critics of prenatal ultrasound were silenced. Once government agencies and industry declared ultrasound “safe,” anyone who questioned it was labeled “anti-science.” Are you seeing the pattern? https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-forgotten-dangers-of-ultrasound

The Forgotten Dangers of Ultrasound What no one tells you about having a healthy pregnancy midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc The most vulnerable victims of all—babies in the womb—never had a voice. But they do now. @MidwesternDoc has compiled over 200 studies showing the risks. Your doctor probably hasn’t read them. But you can right here: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-forgotten-dangers-of-ultrasound

The Forgotten Dangers of Ultrasound What no one tells you about having a healthy pregnancy midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Be sure to share this with every expecting mother you know and those trying to conceive. If doctors aren’t going to heed the Precautionary Principle, we’ll just have to do it ourselves.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Thanks for reading! This information was based on a report originally published by @MidwesternDoc. Key details were streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. Read the original report here. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-forgotten-dangers-of-ultrasound

The Forgotten Dangers of Ultrasound What no one tells you about having a healthy pregnancy midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc For a deeper dive into what modern medicine has overlooked—or intentionally buried—check out these other eye-opening reports by @MidwesternDoc: DMSO is a Miraculous Therapy for Chronic Pain and Musculoskeletal Injuries https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/dmso-is-a-miraculous-therapy-for

DMSO is a Miraculous Therapy for Chronic Pain and Musculoskeletal Injuries The decades of evidence DMSO revolutionizes the practice of medicine midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc The Great Cholesterol Scam and The Dangers of Statins https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-great-cholesterol-scam-and-the

The Great Cholesterol Scam and The Dangers of Statins Exploring the Actual Causes and Treatments of Heart Disease midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc What We've Learned from a Year of Vaccine Shedding Data https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-weve-learned-from-a-year-of

What We've Learned from a Year of Vaccine Shedding Data Numerous data sources now corroborate that the COVID vaccines shed in a consistent and replicable manner midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc While you’re at it, give @MidwesternDoc a follow. No one brings more research, clinical insight, or historical context when it comes to exposing the health myths we’ve all been fed. This is easily one of the most valuable accounts you’ll ever follow. --> @MidwesternDoc https://t.co/HSgsbv3vEG

P_McCulloughMD
Posted - May 2, 2025 at 1:30 AM
Saved - May 2, 2025 at 7:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A new study reveals that among approximately 1.3 million Czech women aged 18–39, those who received the COVID-19 vaccine experienced about 33% fewer successful pregnancies compared to their unvaccinated counterparts. The findings suggest that the mechanism of action of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines may have contributed to a decline in fertility, indicating that a drop in fertility rates was a likely outcome of widespread vaccination efforts.

@P_McCulloughMD - Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®

NEW STUDY — Mass mRNA Injection Campaigns Likely Fueling the Global Fertility Collapse Among ~1.3 million Czech women aged 18–39, those vaccinated against COVID-19 had ~33% fewer successful pregnancies compared to unvaccinated women. Given the dangerous mechanism of action of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, a drop in fertility was an inevitable outcome of mass indiscriminate global vaccination. @NicHulscher @McCulloughFund @MannicheVibeke @DowdEdward https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/new-study-mass-mrna-injection-campaigns?r=14jb45&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false

NEW STUDY — Mass mRNA Injection Campaigns Likely Fueling the Global Fertility Collapse Among ~1.3 million Czech women aged 18–39, those vaccinated against COVID-19 had ~33% fewer successful pregnancies compared to unvaccinated women. thefocalpoints.com
ZdenekVrozina
Posted - June 17, 2025 at 5:55 PM
Saved - June 20, 2025 at 11:17 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve come across alarming research linking prenatal COVID exposure to significant neurodevelopmental delays in infants. A Brazilian study found that 36% of toddlers had cognitive delays, with cytokine profiles in cord blood predicting these outcomes. Other studies highlighted increased autism rates in COVID-exposed children and identified placental damage even in asymptomatic mothers. Structural brain changes and epigenetic alterations were also noted. This is a call to action for expectant parents to receive clear information about these risks, as the silence from public health is concerning.

@ZdenekVrozina - Zdenek Vrozina

Prenatal COVID and Infant Brain Development - New Data, Alarming Trends We begin with a 2025 study from Brazil, the first to directly link cytokines in cord blood with neurodevelopmental delays in toddlers exposed to SARS-CoV-2 in the womb. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41390-025-04192-w

Cord blood cytokines/chemokines linked to delays in toddlers exposed to SARS-CoV-2 prenatally - Pediatric Research Maternal infections are linked to neurodevelopmental impairments, highlighting the need to investigate SARS-CoV-2-induced immune activation. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of maternal infection on neurodevelopment and investigate whether cytokine and chemokine profiles predict delays at 24 months. Conducted in Brazil (January 2021–March 2022), this follow-up study included 18 SARS-CoV-2 positive pregnant women at 35–37 weeks’ gestation, 15 umbilical cord blood samples, and blood samples from 15 children at 6 months and 14 at 24 months. Developmental delay was defined using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition, with scores below 90 in cognitive, communication, or motor domains. At 6 months, 33.3% of infants exhibited cognitive delays, 20% communication delays, and 40% motor delays, increasing to 35.71%, 64.29%, and 57.14% at 24 months, respectively. Elevated interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in cord blood correlated with cognitive delays, while interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-17, and IL-1β were associated with motor delays. Increased C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 and other cytokines were associated with communication delays. Maternal SARS-CoV-2 may impact infant neurodevelopment, as early cytokine elevations correlate with delays, highlighting the importance of early monitoring and interventions to reduce long-term effects. nature.com

@ZdenekVrozina - Zdenek Vrozina

At 24 months of age: 36% showed cognitive delays 64% had language delays (sic) 57% had motor delays And here’s the striking part: these delays were predicted by the cytokine profile in umbilical cord blood.

@ZdenekVrozina - Zdenek Vrozina

Elevated inflammation markers: IFN-γ & TNF-α - cognitive delays IL-6, IL-8, IL-17, IL-1β - motor delays CXCL10 - language delays This is strong evidence for maternal immune activation - a mechanism also seen in autism and schizophrenia research.

@ZdenekVrozina - Zdenek Vrozina

A UCLA study tracked 211 COVID-exposed children. At 28 months, 11% screened positive for autism spectrum disorder - far above the expected 1-2%. Some had activated microglia and neuroinflammatory markers in blood at birth. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2024/12/27/world/science-health/covid-pregnancy-autism-study/

COVID pregnancies may have boosted autism risk, study shows 'There’s something really going on,” pediatric infectious diseases physician Karin Nielsen says. 'We don’t want to alarm the world, but that’s what our data are showing.” japantimes.co.jp

@ZdenekVrozina - Zdenek Vrozina

Then comes the placenta. A Michigan pathology review identified SARS-CoV-2 placentitis even in asymptomatic mothers (2025): fibrin deposition intervillositis trophoblast necrosis confirmed virus in placental tissue Risk: fetal hypoxia, IUGR, stillbirth https://meridian.allenpress.com/aplm/article/doi/10.5858/arpa.2024-0247-RA/506106/SARS-CoV-2-Placentitis-A-Review-of-Pathologic

@ZdenekVrozina - Zdenek Vrozina

Structural brain changes have also been observed. An Italian study found ultrasound abnormalities in 23% of newborns exposed to SARS-CoV-2 in utero - vs. 16% of controls. Most were minor (cysts) - but statistically significant. https://ijponline.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13052-024-01826-3

Cranial ultrasonographic findings in newborns exposed to SARS-CoV-2: a single-centre cross-sectional analysis - Italian Journal of Pediatrics SARS-CoV-2’s potential consequences on the developing brain are still unknown. The aim of this study was to describe cranial ultrasonographic (cUS) findings in a population of newborns exposed to SARS-CoV-2 born at San Marco Hospital in Catania. Two cohort of newborns, one exposed to SARS-CoV-2 both during gestation and at birth and one unexposed, were enrolled in this cross-sectional study conducted according to the STROBE guidelines (Strenghtening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) and underwent cUS. We performed a statistical analysis using the Fisher’s exact test to assess whether significant differences among the two groups existed. we enrolled 139 exposed newborns (62 females, 77 males with median gestational age 38.4 ± 1.9 W and median weight at birth 3142.8 ± 594.4 g) and 139 unexposed newborns (60 females, 79 males with median gestational age 38,9 ± 1.3 W and median weight at birth 3230 ± 336 g). cUS abnormalities were found in 32 exposed patients (23%) and in 23 (16.5%) unexposed patients. A statistically significant difference was found in the incidence of minor intracranial abnormalities (p 0.036) between exposed and unexposed patients and between newborns exposed during pregnancy and unexposed patients (p 0.016). in our experience, the incidence of minor intracranial abnormalities was higher in SARS-COV-2-exposed newborns. Our results must be taken with caution and need further confirmation in larger studies but suggest to consider performing cUS at birth in newborns exposed to SARS-CoV-2 in research contexts. ijponline.biomedcentral.com

@ZdenekVrozina - Zdenek Vrozina

Harvard researchers found the effect is sex-specific. Boys born to SARS-CoV-2 positive mothers had 2× the risk of neurodevelopmental diagnoses at 12 months. Girls showed no such increase. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2802745

@ZdenekVrozina - Zdenek Vrozina

And finally: epigenetics. A Swedish 2025 study showed that even mild maternal COVID-19 alters DNA methylation in the infant’s immune and brain-related genes. Genes involved in neuron signaling, interferon response, and neurodevelopment were affected. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.05.10.25327356v1

DNA methylation changes in infants of mothers with SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy medRxiv - The Preprint Server for Health Sciences medrxiv.org

@ZdenekVrozina - Zdenek Vrozina

In summary: SARS-CoV-2 exposure in utero can leave a long shadow - through neuroinflammation placental dysfunction brain structure changes and epigenetic rewiring The science is clear. The risks are real.

@ZdenekVrozina - Zdenek Vrozina

But this isn’t just a warning. It’s a call to action. Expectant parents deserve clear, science-based information on prenatal COVID risks. No child should suffer lifelong harm from an exposure their mother wasn’t told mattered. We are losing futures before they’re even born.

@ZdenekVrozina - Zdenek Vrozina

After five years of research, dozens of peer-reviewed studies, and signals from across continents…how is it possible that public health remains silent? No warnings. No prenatal screening protocols. No public campaigns. No plan. The children deserved better. And still do. @szupraha @ZdravkoOnline

joshg99
Posted - June 20, 2025 at 8:55 PM
Saved - June 21, 2025 at 6:59 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m excited to share our new pre-print on COVID-19 vaccine safety in pregnancy. Our analysis of over 200,000 pregnancies in Israel revealed that women vaccinated in early pregnancy (weeks 8-13) experienced higher-than-expected fetal losses, particularly after week 24. In contrast, influenza vaccination during the same period showed fewer fetal losses, highlighting a significant difference. Our findings suggest a safety signal that warrants further investigation, especially since our methodology aimed to minimize biases commonly seen in vaccine safety research.

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

Our new pre-print on COVID-19 vaccine safety in pregnancy is out! Women vaccinated in early pregnancy (weeks 8-13) had a higher-than-expected number of fetal losses: Dose 1 = 3.9 more per 100 women Dose 3 = 1.9 more per 100 women Based on data on >200K pregnancies in Israel 🧵

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

2/ Late pregnancy losses were a *big* part of the signal. Among all women: 1.1% lost their pregnancy after week 24. Compared to: 2.7% of women who received dose 1 in early weeks. 1.8% of women who received dose 3 in early weeks.

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

3/ In fact, most of the excess losses occurred later in pregnancy, including nearly half after week 24. In Israel, abortions after week 24 are rare and must be medically justified and are very rare. This strongly suggests biological, not behavioral, mechanisms are involved.

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

4/ In stark contrast, women vaccinated for influenza in the same weeks (8-13) saw *FEWER* fetal losses than expected, about 5 per 100 women vaccinated. What's the significance of that?

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

5/ Comparing both types of vaccines helps control for bias in who chooses to get vaccinated. For example, if women vaccinate in early pregnancy because they have health problems, the elevated fetal loss risk for COVID-19 vaccines could simply be due to that bias.

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

6/ But people who get vaccinated are usually healthier & more health conscious to begin with. This is called healthy vaccinee bias & can make vaccines look safer than they really are. It's a known – but often ignored -- issue in vaccine safety research based on real-world data.

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

7/ Influenza vaccination during pregnancy showed lower-than-expected fetal losses—likely due to healthy vaccine bias. So it's even more striking that mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in early pregnancy showed higher-than-expected fetal losses—despite healthy vaccinee bias.

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

8/ Our findings don’t prove causation. But they point to a clear safety signal—one that calls for further investigation, especially given the vulnerability of this population.

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

9/ So why hasn’t this been seen before? Most other studies compare vaccinated vs. unvaccinated women during vaccination campaigns. That approach is vulnerable to bias—especially if healthier women are more likely to vaccinate (a.k.a. “healthy vaccinee bias”).

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

10/ Our approach was different. We used detailed medical records to estimate expected fetal loss rates for each vaccinated woman—based on her individual risk factors and pregnancy timing—using data from pre-COVID years.

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

11/ Here is a link to the pre-print: https://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2025.06.18.25329352v1 This was of course a team effort with my amazing co-authors: @RetsefL, @TalPatalon, Sivan Gazit, @TracyBethHoeg, @JosephFraiman and Yaakov Segal.

Observed-to-Expected Fetal Losses Following mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination in Early Pregnancy medRxiv - The Preprint Server for Health Sciences medrxiv.org

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

https://t.co/se1GOqkvtl

@RetsefL - Retsef Levi

BREAKING: Analysis of over 220K pregnancies in Israel during 2016- 2022 found that mRNA COVID-19 vaccination during gestational weeks 8-13 was associated with a higher-than-expected number of eventual fetal losses (miscarriages, abortions & stillbirths)! Pregnant women vaccinated with dose 1 during weeks 8-13 had nearly 3.9 (95% CI: [2.55-5.14]) additional fetal losses above expected per 100 pregnancies. Most of the excess fetal losses occurred after gestational week 20 and nearly half occurred after gestational week 25. In contrast, pregnant women vaccinated for influenza during weeks 8-27 exhibited a consistently lower-than-expected observed number of fetal losses, likely the result of healthy vaccinee bias. Women vaccinated for COVID-19 or influenza prior to pregnancy exhibited according-to-expected or lower-than-expected numbers of fetal losses. The study used innovative observed-to-expected methodology, where data from prior years were leveraged to determine the expected number of fetal losses based on the individual characteristics of the pregnant women who vaccinated and their week of vaccination.

NicHulscher
Posted - June 25, 2025 at 6:59 PM
Saved - July 13, 2025 at 12:22 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

We now have clear evidence that the COVID-19 mRNA shots have devastated the reproductive capacity of humanity. In animal models, they destroy >60% of women’s finite egg supply. In human data (n=1.3M), vaccinated women have ~33% fewer successful pregnancies than unvaccinated. https://t.co/zy81FCejQY

Video Transcript AI Summary
mRNA vaccinated rats experienced a 60% reduction in primordial follicles, which are essential for life and do not regenerate. mRNA shots are allegedly getting into the ovaries, instructing them to produce toxic spike protein. The body attacks this protein, resulting in tissue damage and egg destruction. This follicle damage allegedly leads to 33% lower birth rates in vaccinated women, as seen in human data. This combination of factors is considered worrisome and demands attention from regulators. It is claimed that humanity's fertility is being run off a cliff.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The mRNA vaccinated rats had six a 60% reduction in premortial follicles. So this is this is essential, for life. Women are born with a finite amount of these follicles, and they do not regenerate. So in other words, these mRNA shots are getting into the ovaries, instructing them to produce toxic spike protein, the body attacks it, then you're gonna get this tissue damage, and egg destruction, which doesn't regenerate. And then you're going to have these thirty three percent lower, birth rates in vaccinated women as we see with the human data. And so all of this combined is extraordinarily worrisome and it demands attention by regulators who have failed to do anything about this. And now we're just running humanity's fertility off a cliff.

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

BREAKING : now in peer reviewed journal: A stunning 33% reduction in the rate of successful conceptions among vaccinated women compared to unvaccinated women. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09246479251353384

newstart_2024
Posted - July 16, 2025 at 11:12 AM
Saved - July 16, 2025 at 12:04 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find the evidence regarding COVID vaccines and their potential impact on reproductive health alarming. Studies suggest that female fertility could be at risk, with vaccines possibly destroying a significant percentage of a woman’s eggs. Male fertility may also decline, with reduced sperm count and motility. Additionally, there are rising pregnancy complications, including miscarriages and stillbirths. Data indicates a global decline in birth rates following mass vaccinations. Early animal studies hint at a possible link to autism. It feels like a generational crisis that is being overlooked.

@newstart_2024 - Camus

Alarming: COVID Vaccines and the Silent Reproductive Crisis – The Evidence Speaks 1️⃣ Female Fertility at Risk Studies show COVID vaccines may destroy up to 60% of a woman’s eggs—permanently. Young girls vaccinated today could face lifelong fertility challenges. 2️⃣ Male Fertility Impact Sperm count and motility drop significantly post-vaccination, with recovery taking at least six months—if it happens at all. 3️⃣ Pregnancy Complications Surging - Miscarriages rising - Stillbirths increasing - Premature births more frequent - Maternal mortality at historic highs (especially in the U.S.) 4️⃣ Global Fertility Decline Data from Denmark reveals a sharp drop in birth rates nine months after mass vaccination began (December 2021). The timing is undeniable. 5️⃣ Autism Link in Animal Studies Early research in mice shows autistic-like behaviors in offspring after maternal vaccination. Could humans be next? The Unspoken Truth Medical institutions stay silent. Governments ignore the data. Media dismisses concerns. This isn’t just a health issue—it’s a generational crisis. 🔁 Share this. The world deserves the truth.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the potential impact of COVID vaccines on reproductive health. One speaker references Naomi Wolf's claim that boys were "neutered in utero" when their mothers were vaccinated, based on Pfizer's reporting. Another speaker claims that female vaccines wipe out about 60% of eggs, which is brutal. For men, the vaccines drop sperm count and motility significantly for about six months, but that rebounds. The vaccines raise the rates of miscarriages, stillbirth, premature delivery. Maternal mortality is at a record high, and it is almost certainly among the vaccinated. A former Danish public health official, Bibiki Managy, found that global fertility plunged around December 2021, about nine months after the vaccines rolled out. The speakers suggest that vaccines may affect the process of forming eggs or oocytes in young girls. Menstrual periods are disturbed, and the whole cycle is thrown off. COVID vaccines actually cause autistic behaviors in mice.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know you're not an obstetrician obstetrician, if I'm saying that just right. But, one of my biggest concerns has been through that vein is is what is that doing to our reproductive our children and their grand you know, grandchildren, babies that are get back to Naomi Wolf, they found that that boys were neutered in utero when their moms were vaccinated with the COVID shot. Don't know how they discovered that, but I think that kills an enzyme in the uterus or something like that. But they again, that's a Pfizer reporting on themselves. So are you seeing any reproductive type stuff in your practice? I know obstetrician, there's a, the college of obstetrician and whatever is a big news. They keep kind of, sticking their nose in it a little bit, but, any comments on that? Speaker 1: Yeah, most of societies are completely mum on the vaccines. They just don't, as if they don't exist. It's really, it's an amazing walk back from them. But recently Nick Holcher on Focal Points pointed out that the female eggs, remember women's ovaries only a certain number of eggs. The vaccines wipe out about sixty percent of eggs, which is brutal. So right then and there, women start, who've taken the shot and that's anytime during their life. If they've taken a shot at any time, it's gonna wipe out about 60% of the eggs. For men, the vaccines do drop sperm count and motility significantly for about six months and that rebounds. So the sperm and the testes seem to respond. Clearly the vaccines raise the rates of miscarriages, stillbirth, premature delivery. So it makes pregnancy What we're By the way, we're at record maternal mortality right now. It's still going up record. Can you imagine that? Maternal mortality, we should never have a woman die during pregnancy, ever. But in The United States, it's something like six thousand. I mean, it's a huge number. It is almost certainly among the vaccinated. And I think the final piece of data that came in is from a former Danish public health official, Bibiki Managy, who found that we're basically in a fertility crisis now. That in their fertility global fertility plunged right around December of twenty twenty one. So about nine months after the vaccines rolled out. Do Speaker 0: you think that would impact, let's say young girls, you talked about the eggs, young girls not yet not yet of of age, if they're getting the shots, is that going to impact their ability to get eggs? Sorry for sounding like a like a, just a bum on the street here, but I I don't know how else to phrase it. Speaker 1: Well, may it may affect this whole process of forming, eggs or oocytes. And, certainly because the menstrual periods are disturbed, you know, ovulation is a very delicate cycle from the release conception where the sperm and egg meet in the fallopian tube, and then implantation in the uterus. That whole cycle's thrown off. I think that's the reason why fertility is, is dropping because it's multi level, it's multi level. And we just don't know if it's gonna rebound, but it looks pretty bad right now. Fertility is dropping. Gynecologic health has been harmed greatly. And, you know, it's just, it's there's one study, it's been done in animals, not in humans, but believe it or not, when done in a, in like a mice model, the COVID vaccines actually cause autistic behaviors in mice. Speaker 0: Wow.
The_Healthy_Man
Posted - August 11, 2025 at 12:03 PM
Saved - August 12, 2025 at 4:05 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In the past, men enjoyed better health and fertility, but today, testosterone levels and sperm counts have plummeted. Factors like seed oils, glyphosate, microplastics, and chronic stress contribute to this decline. Modern diets and lifestyles, including excessive screen time and poor sleep, further exacerbate hormonal issues. The fertility crisis is real and starts before birth, affecting future generations. To combat this, I recommend filtering water, eating real fats, blocking blue light, and prioritizing sleep and exercise. Reclaiming health is essential.

@The_Healthy_Man - The Healthy Man | Peak Longevity & Performance 🧬

In the 80s, your dad drank full-fat milk, chain-smoked, and still had 3 kids. Today? • T levels halved • Sperm counts down 62% • Erectile dysfunction is common in men under 30 Male fertility has collapsed. If you’re a man, open this thread before it’s too late: 🧵

@The_Healthy_Man - The Healthy Man | Peak Longevity & Performance 🧬

Back in 1995: • Your dad wore baggy jeans • Your mom blasted Mariah Carey • Fertility wasn’t a problem Today? • 1 in 4 couples can’t conceive • IVF clinics are booming • Sperm counts are falling like Nokia stock Why?

@The_Healthy_Man - The Healthy Man | Peak Longevity & Performance 🧬

Scientists blame a perfect storm: • Seed oils in your cells • Glyphosate in your food • Microplastics in your blood • Chronic stress killing your libido • Blue light frying your hormones • Endocrine disruptors in your soap You’re being chemically castrated by your environment.

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Plastics, personal care products, sunscreens, food containers, pesticides, and even many plant based health foods like soy and flax seeds all contain chemicals that act as potent endocrine disruptors in the body, lowering your testosterone levels and increasing your estrogen levels unnaturally." "Pervasiveness of endocrine disrupting chemicals in our modern society has become rampant and disturbing." "For example, pesticides sprayed on our food supply have all been known to cause chemical castration." "In this study, the researchers tested 37 widely used pest icides to see if any of them had any anti androgenic effects in vivo." "Out of the 37 tested chemicals, 30 were shown to be anti androgenic."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Plastics, personal care products, sunscreens, food containers, pesticides, and even many plant based health foods like soy and flax seeds all contain chemicals that act as potent endocrine disruptors in the body, lowering your testosterone levels and increasing your estrogen levels unnaturally. Pervasiveness of endocrine disrupting chemicals in our modern society has become rampant and disturbing. For example, pesticides sprayed on our food supply have all been known to cause chemical castration. In this study, the researchers tested 37 widely used pest icides to see if any of them had any anti androgenic effects in vivo. Out of the 37 tested chemicals, 30 were shown to be anti androgenic.

@The_Healthy_Man - The Healthy Man | Peak Longevity & Performance 🧬

Microplastics? Yeah. 90s kids collected Pokémon cards. Today’s kids collect plastic in their bloodstream. Plastic wrecks testosterone production. Your sperm count is dropping—and you don’t even feel it happening.

@The_Healthy_Man - The Healthy Man | Peak Longevity & Performance 🧬

Now? • T drops 1% every year • Sperm counts have crashed since 1973 • Men in their 20s have the fertility of men in their 50s back then This is a silent hormonal apocalypse.

Video Transcript AI Summary
If you look at the sperm concentrations when we last look at them, was samples collected in 2011, the sperm concentration in Western countries was 47,000,000 per milliliter, down from 99,000,000 per milliliter thirty nine years earlier. So that's a decline of more than 1% per year, and it would predict between 2011 and now, which is ten years, that we would be now below 40,000,000 per milliliter. And that's an important number because below 40, it becomes increasingly difficult for couples to become pregnant. And how low it's gonna go before we wake up and say, we have to stop this. I don't know how long that's gonna take, but it's urgent.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you look at the sperm concentrations when we last look at them, was samples collected in 2011, the sperm concentration in Western countries was 47,000,000 per milliliter, down from 99,000,000 per milliliter thirty nine years earlier. So that's a decline of more than 1% per year, and it would predict between 2011 and now, which is ten years, that we would be now below 40,000,000 per milliliter. And that's an important number because below 40, it becomes increasingly difficult for couples to become pregnant. And how low it's gonna go before we wake up and say, we have to stop this. I don't know how long that's gonna take, but it's urgent.

@The_Healthy_Man - The Healthy Man | Peak Longevity & Performance 🧬

The fix? I've found Formulation Factory Primal Power packed with grass-fed liver, heart, testicle, and marrow—the nutrients your body actually needs to rebuild hormones. No plant powders. No synthetic “boosters.” Just raw nutrition: #ad https://lvnta.com/lv_fqtqGJQx0affDWOphr

@The_Healthy_Man - The Healthy Man | Peak Longevity & Performance 🧬

And your food isn’t helping: In 1999, your lunch was: • Full-fat milk • Buttered bread • Maybe a Coca-Cola Today? • Seed oils in every meal • Soy protein in “healthy” snacks • Artificial sweeteners confusing your metabolism Your hormones never stood a chance.

@The_Healthy_Man - The Healthy Man | Peak Longevity & Performance 🧬

In the 90s, night meant darkness. Now? • Screens until midnight • Blue light after sunset • Melatonin wiped out • Sleep destroyed And without sleep? Your hormones can’t recover.

@The_Healthy_Man - The Healthy Man | Peak Longevity & Performance 🧬

Want to fix metabolism and energy at the same time? I recommend Formulation Factory Melt Mode. Green tea extract, CLA, L-carnitine, glucomannan—all to help burn fat and support energy, without gimmicks. Here’s the one I trust: https://lvnta.com/lv_KX9yFIHhqDAj6N45qu

Amazon.com. Spend less. Smile more. Free shipping on millions of items. Get the best of Shopping and Entertainment with Prime. Enjoy low prices and great deals on the largest selection of everyday essentials and other products, including fashion, home, beauty, electronics, Alexa Devices, sporting goods, toys, automotive, pets, baby, books, video games, musical instruments, office supplies, and more. amazon.com

@The_Healthy_Man - The Healthy Man | Peak Longevity & Performance 🧬

Here’s the scariest part: This damage starts before you’re even born. Babies today are marinated in: • Pesticides • Plastics • Hormone disruptors Before they can crawl, their fertility is compromised. https://t.co/4Ad5kquEGD

Video Transcript AI Summary
Phthalates as a class are called anti androgens. Wherever they meet testosterone, they tend to decrease it and most dramatically in the womb in early pregnancy. One particular way that we see that is the size of the genital area, which is called the anogenital distance. Then when the boy grows up, he will have, we've shown, a lower sperm count. Besides having an impact on sperm count, it can increase the risk of genital defects, undescended testicles, for example, and later it actually can increase the risk of testicular cancer.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Phthalates as a class are called anti androgens. Wherever they meet testosterone, they tend to decrease it and most dramatically in the womb in early pregnancy. One particular way that we see that is the size of the genital area, which is called the anogenital distance. Then when the boy grows up, he will have, we've shown, a lower sperm count. Count. Besides having an impact on sperm count, it can increase the risk of genital defects, undescended testicles, for example, and later it actually can increase the risk of testicular cancer.

@The_Healthy_Man - The Healthy Man | Peak Longevity & Performance 🧬

The solution? • Filter your water (block plastics) • Eat real fats (ditch seed oils) • Block blue light at night • Ditch plastic containers • Sleep like your life depends on it • Train, lift, sweat, walk https://t.co/gfItpphkA5

@The_Healthy_Man - The Healthy Man | Peak Longevity & Performance 🧬

The fertility crisis isn’t a theory. It’s real. It’s preventable. And it’s accelerating. Your grandpa fathered kids after steak and cigarettes. Modern men? They’re paying $20K for IVF. https://t.co/RqLdQI2CHp

@The_Healthy_Man - The Healthy Man | Peak Longevity & Performance 🧬

Make it make sense. Follow @The_Healthy_Man for more no-BS guides to reclaim your hormones and health. Repost the first tweet to warn every man you care about. Because becoming strong and fertile again is the ultimate rebellion.

@The_Healthy_Man - The Healthy Man | Peak Longevity & Performance 🧬

In the 80s, your dad drank full-fat milk, chain-smoked, and still had 3 kids. Today? • T levels halved • Sperm counts down 62% • Erectile dysfunction is common in men under 30 Male fertility has collapsed. If you’re a man, open this thread before it’s too late: 🧵 https://t.co/Bgld0X8YhC

celestialbe1ng
Posted - August 15, 2025 at 9:25 AM
Saved - August 17, 2025 at 2:46 AM

@celestialbe1ng - Veronica

Study finds pregnant women with low thyroid function were nearly four (4!) times more likely to have autistic children, according to this article in Science Daily https://t.co/T0KLivrxDY

View Full Interactive Feed