TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

TexasLindsay_
Posted - April 24, 2023 at 4:53 PM
Saved - April 24, 2023 at 6:48 PM

@TexasLindsay_ - TexasLindsay™

Tucker Carlson’s speech over the weekend was powerful. Too powerful apparently. https://t.co/sxncP26Tda

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker suggests that the terms used to describe current debates need to be reassessed. They argue that the debates are not rational discussions about achieving mutually agreed-upon outcomes, but rather a manifestation of evil. They give examples such as the transgender movement and abortion, stating that these issues cannot be assessed through traditional political lenses. The speaker believes that destruction and chaos are the goals of these movements, and that good is characterized by order and peace. They propose that instead of engaging in fraudulent debates, people should acknowledge the larger forces at play and consider taking a few minutes each day to pray for the future.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It it might be time to start to reassess the terms we use to to describe what we're watching. So when I started at Heritage, the presumption was, and this is a very Anglo American assumption, that the debates we're having are kind of rational debates about the way to get to mutually agreed upon outcomes. Right? So, like, we all want the country to be more prosperous and free and people to be less oppressed or whatever. And so we're gonna argue about tax rates, and I think higher tax gets gets us there. I'm, like, Keynesian, and you disagree, you're an Austrian, whatever, but the objective is the same. And so we write our papers, and they write their papers, and may the best papers win. I I I don't think that's what we're watching now at all. I don't think we're watching a debate over how to get to the best outcome. I think that's completely wrong. And I've come to this conclusion, not and I should say at the outset, I'm an Episcopalian, so don't take any theological advice from me because I don't have any. I grew up in the shallowest faith tradition that's ever been invented. It's not even a Christian religion at this point. I say with shame. But I'm just saying this is an observer of what's going on. There is no way to assess, say, the transgenders movement with that mindset. Policy papers don't account for it at all. If you have people who are saying, I have an idea. Let's castrate the next generation. Let's sexually mutilate children. Sorry, that's not a political debate. What? It has nothing to do with politics. What's the outcome we're desiring here? An androgynous population? Is that really what we are we arguing for that? Nope. I don't think anyone could, like, defend that as a positive outcome. But the weight of the government and, you know, a lot of corporate interests are behind that. Well, what is that? Well, it's irrational. If you say, well, you know, I think abortion is always bad. Well, I think sometimes it's necessary. That's a debate I'm familiar with. But if you're telling me that abortion is a positive good, what are you saying? Well, you're arguing for child sacrifice, obviously. It's not about, like, oh, a teen, you know, a teen girl gets pregnant and what do we do about that and victims of rape? I you know, I get it. I of course, I understand that, and I have compassion for everyone involved. When the treasury secretary stands up and says, you know what you can do to help the economy get an abortion? Well, you that's like an Aztec principle, actually. There's not a society in history that didn't practice human sacrifice. Not one. I checked. Even the Scandinavians, I'm ashamed to say, it wasn't just the Mesoamericans, it was everybody. So, like, that's what that is. What's the point of child sacrifice? Well, there's no policy goal entwined with that, no. That's a theological phenomenon. And that's kind of the point I'm making. None of this makes sense in conventional political terms, when people or crowds of people or the largest crowd of people at all, which is the federal government, the largest human organization in human history, decide that the goal is to destroy things. Destruction for its own sake. Hey. Let's tear it down. What you're watching is not a political movement, it's evil. So if you want to assess, and I'll put it in non and I'll stop with this. I'll put it in non I'll put it in non political, or non rather non specific theological terms and just say, if you wanna know what's evil and what's good, what are the characteristics of those? And by the way, you know, I I think the Athenians would have agreed with this. This is not necessarily just a Christian notion. This is kind of a, let's say, widely agreed upon understanding of good and evil, what are its products? What are these 2 conditions produce? Well, I mean, good is characterized by order, calmness, tranquility, peace, whatever you wanna call it, lack of conflict, cleanliness. Cleanliness is next to godliness. It's true. It is. And evil is characterized by their opposites. Violence, hate, disorder, division, disorganization and filth. So if you are all in on the things that produce the latter basket of outcomes, what you're really advocating for is evil. That's just true. I'm not calling for religious war. Far from it. I'm merely calling for an acknowledgement of what we're watching, which is not what and I'm not certainly not backing the Republican Party. I mean, ugh. I'm not making a partisan point at all. I'm I'm just noting what's super obvious. Like, those of us who are in our mid fifties are caught in the past in the way that we think about this. One side's like, no. No. You know, I've got this idea, and we've got this idea, let's have a debate about our ideas. They don't want a debate. Those ideas won't produce outcomes that any rational person would want under any circumstances, those are manifestations of some larger force acting upon us. It's just so obvious. It's completely obvious. And I think 2 things. 1, we should say that and stop engaging in these totally fraudulent debates where we are using the terms that we used in 1991 when I started at Heritage as if maybe, you know, I could just win the debate if I marshaled more facts. I've tried that. Doesn't work. And 2, maybe we should all take just, like, 10 minutes a day to say a prayer about it. I'm serious. Like, why not? And I'm saying that to you not as some kind of evangelist. I'm literally saying that to you as an Episcopalian. The Samaritans of our time. I'm coming to you from the most humble and lowly theological position you can. Man, I'm literally an Episcopalian. Okay? And even I have concluded, it might be worth taking just 10 minutes out of your busy schedule, to say a prayer for the future, and I hope you will.
jonesville
Posted - November 5, 2023 at 6:30 AM
Saved - November 5, 2023 at 4:28 PM

@jonesville - Jason Jones

While I have your attention—this commie POS is NOT an American PATRIOT https://t.co/HCjJEiyCO6

csharpner
Posted - February 6, 2024 at 7:48 PM
Saved - February 6, 2024 at 8:09 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Can you comment on colleagues calling Tucker Carlson a "traitor" for interviewing Putin?

@csharpner - American

@KeirSimmons can you comment on your colleagues trying to call your other colleague, @TuckerCarlson a "traitor" for interviewing Putin? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6pJd6O_NT0

@csharpner - American

@KeirSimmons @TuckerCarlson @charlierose can you comment on your colleagues trying to call your other colleague, @TuckerCarlson a "traitor" for interviewing Putin? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6l69tRETnlo

@csharpner - American

@KeirSimmons @TuckerCarlson @charlierose @_HadleyGamble @HADLEYGAMBLE can you comment on your colleagues trying to call your other colleague, @TuckerCarlson a "traitor" for interviewing Putin? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oLzejY5zV5U

@csharpner - American

@KeirSimmons @TuckerCarlson @charlierose @_HadleyGamble @HADLEYGAMBLE @NBCNews can you comment on your colleagues trying to call your other colleague, @TuckerCarlson a "traitor" for interviewing Putin? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BzJSP99a4T4

@csharpner - American

@KeirSimmons @TuckerCarlson @charlierose @_HadleyGamble @HADLEYGAMBLE @NBCNews @RogerJStoneJr can you comment on the left wing reporters calling @TuckerCarlson a "traitor" for interviewing Putin? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDP7ik2wBzs

EndWokeness
Posted - February 8, 2024 at 2:54 AM
Saved - February 8, 2024 at 5:36 AM

@EndWokeness - End Wokeness

Hillary blasts Tucker Carlson and suggests he is part of a 5th Column for Putin: "He's like a puppy dog… He's been fired from so many outlets here in the U.S. that I wouldn't be surprised if he emerges with a contract from a Russian outlet." https://t.co/lKc1lxoGk5

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses Tucker Carlson, describing him as a "useful idiot" who spreads false information and echoes Vladimir Putin's lies about Ukraine. They express concern about Carlson potentially getting a contract with another outlet despite his history of being fired for not reporting the truth. The speaker also questions why certain Republicans and Americans believe Putin and why Trump trusted him over intelligence agencies. They seek a working theory for these actions.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I mean, he's like a puppy dog. You know? He somehow has after having been fired from so many outlets in the United States, he, I would not be surprised, if he emerges with a contract with outlet because he is a useful idiot. He says things that are not true. He parrots Vladimir Putin's, pack of lies about Ukraine. So I don't see why Putin wouldn't give him an interview because through him, he can, you know, continue to lie about what his, you know, objectives are in Ukraine and and, you know, what he expects to see happen. It's really quite sad that not just somebody like Tucker Carlson who has, as I said, been fired so many times because he seems unable to, you know, correlate his reporting with the truth. But also because it's a sign that there are people in this country right now who are like a 5th column for Vladimir Putin. And why? I don't know. I mean, why are certain Republicans throwing their lot in? Why are, you know, other Americans basically believing, Putin. Why did Trump believe Putin more than our 11 intelligence agencies? I don't know. Do you have a working theory or do you have a working theory?
Breaking911
Posted - February 17, 2024 at 9:37 PM
Saved - February 20, 2024 at 3:27 AM

@Breaking911 - Breaking911

Tucker Carlson is ‘un-American’ for interviewing Putin! Meanwhile, CBS News sits down with Hamas terrorists. https://t.co/zpEveJrOXt

Video Transcript AI Summary
A Hamas commander in the West Bank recruits young fighters, justifying violence as reclaiming their land from Israel. Despite casualties, he believes in armed struggle. An Israeli negotiator warns that attacking Hamas only strengthens them, suggesting peace and sharing the land as a solution. The cycle of violence will end when Israelis leave, but Palestinians also deserve freedom and rights for a new beginning.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We met a Hamas commander at an undisclosed location in the West Bank. Are you a wanted man? Speaker 1: I am. Indeed. Speaker 0: Calling himself Abu Abed, he joined 9 years ago when he was just 16. Almost half that time was spent in jail. Now he is a Hamas recruiter. Are you seeing more young people joining Hamas here in the West Bank since October 7? Speaker 1: For sure, all the Palestinian people are standing by Hamas. I give the fighters guidance. When Israeli forces enter, I tell them what to do and how to open fire. Speaker 0: On October 7th, women and children were murdered. Speaker 1: We see death every single day. Israel lost what? 1000 or 2000 people killed? That's nothing. Speaker 0: But it doesn't make it right to kill women and children. Speaker 1: This is my land. My land. We repeatedly told Israel to get out peacefully, and they refused. So it's only normal that we take it back by force. Speaker 0: He blindly repeats the blatant lie that no civilians were killed by Hamas on October 7th. Speaker 1: We don't fight civilians. We have always fought against the army. Speaker 0: Nor is there remorse for the more than twenty 8,000 Palestinians killed, nearly 2 thirds of them women and children in Israel's bombardment of Gaza. You had to have known that that would have been Israel's response, that Palestinians would suffer as a result. So is there any regret? Speaker 1: We are not pleased with that, but this is the path of the armed struggle. Speaker 0: Gershon Baskin is a veteran Israeli hostage negotiator. He knows Hamas well. Speaker 2: The more that Israel hits Hamas, the stronger Hamas will grow. Speaker 0: And as for Netanyahu's repeatedly stated aim of eliminating Hamas Speaker 2: There is no elimination of Hamas. Israel can defeat Hamas militarily, but the only way you you defeat an idea and an ideology is by providing a better idea and a better ideology. Speaker 0: Baskin points out that for decades, Palestinians have been living under the boot of Israeli occupation October 7th, but allowing Israelis to believe the state's October 7th, but allowing Israelis to believe the status quo could remain. Speaker 2: He convinced the Israeli people and the world that Israel can occupy another people for 56 years and expect to have peace or lock 2,200,000 people in a territory like Gaza with 80% poverty and expect to have quiet. You can't have it all. We gotta share this place. Speaker 0: So where does this all end? All this killing, all this suffering. Speaker 1: The killing and the suffering ends when the Israelis walk out of our land. But if they decide to stay, we shall continue to fight. And if I die, somebody else will take my place. Speaker 0: Basquin told us he finds it hard to believe Hamas will continue to run Gaza after the war, but asked the same question, where it all ends, when Palestinians are also seen as people with hopes and dreams. Speaker 2: They're not different from other people. They deserve to live in freedom too. The same right to the same rights. That's the basis of a new beginning. The the same right to the same rights.
gummibear737
Posted - April 5, 2024 at 3:09 PM
Saved - April 5, 2024 at 8:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ben Shapiro criticizes Tucker Carlson for being a "corrupt commentator" who pushes conspiratorial theories without evidence. This comes after Tucker previously accused Ben of not being sufficiently pro-American, questioning his loyalty to Israel and the US.

@gummibear737 - Gummi Bear

Wow, @benshapiro completely trashes @TuckerCarlson here Ben specifically calls out “corrupt commentators” in their 50s who are in the business of “just asking asking questions” Just asking questions is Tucker’s signature MO for pushing conspiratorial theories without evidence

Video Transcript AI Summary
Blaming society and claiming conspiracy without evidence is a common tactic used by corrupt commentators. They hide behind "just asking questions" to push their agenda without providing proof. This tactic is childish and shows a lack of genuine curiosity. Most people using this tactic have an answer they want to suggest but lack evidence, so they avoid accountability by pretending to be innocent questioners.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You blame society. You don't have an answer. So it must be a conspiracy. There must be some sort. And you're just asking questions. You don't know. Right? This is the game that is played by so many corrupt commentators. Just asking questions. I don't have to show you evidence that something terrible is happening. I don't have to actually demonstrate how the thing is happening. I don't have to tell you who the problem is. Wink wink. But I can just tell you right now that there is a but even if and and if I'm asked about it hey. I'm just asking questions. Now, let me tell you something about just asking questions for a second. Just asking questions is a game for children. My son is 7. He can just ask questions. My daughter is 10. She can just ask questions. If you're 50 and you're just asking questions, I don't think you're just asking questions. I think that your level of curiosity is actually quite low. I think that you don't care enough to know or know enough to care. I think that the vast majority of people who are in the just asking questions business have an answer that they want to suggest, but they know there's no evidence for it. So instead, they hide behind just asking questions. In other words, they're completely full

@gummibear737 - Gummi Bear

For context, Tucker trashed Ben by name a few months ago for not being sufficiently pro-American…basically an accusation of dual loyalty vis-a-vis Israel and the US

@gummibear737 - Gummi Bear

Tucker trashing @benshapiro😳 “I’m shocked how little they care about the country, including the person you mentioned, and I can’t imagine how someone like that could get an audience of people who claim to care about America because he doesn’t, obviously” https://t.co/W19XbZTrNR

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes those on the right for focusing on foreign conflicts instead of domestic issues like financial instability and immigration. They question the priorities of individuals who claim to care about America but neglect pressing issues at home. The conversation shifts to the importance of free speech and standing up for rights, especially when facing social pressure. The mention of American citizens on Palestine and the exclusion of certain individuals from the DEI regime is also discussed.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I I don't really care, but I I did think it showed, like, the level of not just corruption, which I knew, but of, like, emotional instability and craziness. I mean, there are people, and I stopped reading any of it, but there are people on the right who have spent the last 2 months every single day focused on a conflict in a foreign country as their own country becomes dangerously unstable on the brink of financial collapse with tens of millions of people who shouldn't be here in the country. We don't know their identities or the purpose of their being here. Like, stuff that's could destroy the country for real and make it impossible for my kids to live here. They've said nothing about that, and they're focused with laser intensity on foreign conflicts. And I'm like, at some point, I've got 4 kids. If I'm so caught up in the problems of my neighbor's children and completely ignoring my own children as they get addicted to drugs and kill themselves, You know, I'm not against helping my neighbor's kids, but clearly, I don't love my kids. I mean, that's that's, you know, that's the only logical conclusion, and they don't care about the country at all. And that's, you know, that's kind of their prerogative, but I do because I have no choice because I'm from here. My family's been here 100 of years. I plan to stay here. Like, I I'm shocked by how little they care about the country, and including the person you mentioned. And I I can't imagine how someone like that could get an audience of people who claimed about care about America, because he doesn't, obviously. Right? Speaker 1: Right. Well, I mean, Tucker, we've seen it too on free speech. I mean, people who built become multimillionaires, who've, you know, made entire careers, who've, you know, literally became famous, you know, on this very reason. I know you've spoken about this previously, but it's very important to our audience as well. Is that, you know, standing up for free speech rights to people you do disagree with is just is probably the most important exercise. And we've seen some of that come for American citizens on Palestine. How do you work through this too when we're both under such immense pressure, even social pressure, like, how could you support this? You know, take maybe the context of the university presidents. We've got billionaires like Bill Ackman, who's they're I I'm curious what you make of this. My assessment is they're upset that they're not included as marginalized within the DEI regime. They claim to be
myhiddenvalue
Posted - May 7, 2024 at 10:02 AM
Saved - May 7, 2024 at 6:20 PM

@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number

"You are the very TRAITOR our forefathers warned us about!" https://t.co/etCAqPgd3m

Video Transcript AI Summary
I thank you for being here, Mr. Mayorkas. Your actions have been watched closely, and it is believed that you have lied. The American public sees this too. You are seen as a threat to freedom and rights, but thankfully the first amendment exists to stop you. Your accusations are untrue.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister Mayorkas, I actually really want to thank you for coming here today for your performance. I have watched with absolute fascination as you have danced and dodged and lied. Yes. Lied. We know you've lied. You know you've lied. But more importantly, the American public knows that you lied. You are the walking, talking epitome of the very tyrant that our forefathers recognized would gravitate towards government service, and it is because of people like you that they drafted the first amendment. The tax on me, quite frankly, are a tax on science. You and people like you would do everything in your power to control speech, to control freedom, to take away our rights, and they've written a document that you do not have the right. Thank god you have the first amendment so that we can stop you from doing what you've been doing with that I yield back. Your accusations are false.
TRUMP_ARMY_
Posted - May 28, 2024 at 5:51 PM
Saved - July 8, 2024 at 9:32 PM

@TRUMP_ARMY_ - TRUMP ARMY

@TuckerCarlson He doesn't Represent Ukrainian People!! https://t.co/oCMBar6grB

JzeViewing
Posted - August 29, 2024 at 2:00 PM
Saved - June 17, 2025 at 7:16 PM

@JzeViewing - Jimbo

Tucker Carlson is CIA https://t.co/IE9nmm6dcf

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tucker Carlson has given varied responses regarding his connections to the CIA. He stated that he applied to the CIA as a college senior wanting to work in operations, influenced by his father's friends who were operations officers. He claimed he "had no idea what the CIA was, actually" at the time. Carlson acknowledged his father's work in conjunction with the CIA. According to Alan MacLeod, Carlson's father, Richard Carlson, directed the US Information Agency (USIA) under Ronald Reagan, overseeing Radio Liberty and Voice of America, which the New York Times called a CIA-built "worldwide propaganda network." Radio Free Europe was directly funded by the CIA until the 1970s. Richard Carlson ran Voice of America, essentially the broadcasting wing of the CIA's propaganda machine, at the height of the Cold War. Carlson now claims to be a "sworn enemy of the CIA." When asked about the Nord Stream pipeline explosion, Carlson denied involvement, but the CIA was implicated. The speaker questions whether it is a coincidence that the son of the former head of the US intelligence agency and director of Voice of Liberty for the CIA is one of the most influential political pundits in America.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When Tucker Carlson is asked about any of his connections to the CIA, he always seems to give a very confusing mix of responses. In an interview with a former member of the CIA, Sean Ryan, he was asked about it. He recounted how everyone around him growing up was in the CIA because his father was. Despite this, he also says that he had no idea what the CIA really was. Speaker 1: You were trying to get into CIA? Yes. Vladimir Putin reminded me. I don't know how he knew that. Yeah. I applied to CIA when I was a senior in college. What did you want to do for the CIA? Operations. Yeah, it was completely different. Completely different organization. Well, who knows what it was, actually? I don't know. I mean, I was operating on the basis of a lot of my father's friends served as operations officers, some really wonderful guys, who I guess I probably shouldn't name, but who were always at our house and were just legit interesting people. So I applied to CIA and that whole application process then, this was 1990, and I should just say, for the record, that I, like, had no idea what the CIA was, actually. And I didn't believe any of the I think Kermit Roosevelt actually lived right down the street from us. Are you kidding? No. Oh, man. That's cool. Speaker 0: This isn't particularly relevant other than this being like a CIA super spy. Kermit Roosevelt Junior is a very famous intelligence officer who worked in the OSS and then the CIA. He was best known for his role in orchestrating the nineteen fifty three coup in Iran. Speaker 1: But I didn't know I mean, but that was just the world you live in in Northwest DC. Like, I didn't I I never thought any of it was bad. And so when I applied to CIA, and I've taken a lot of crap, including from Putin, Oh, you're from a CIA family. Well, yeah, obviously my father worked in conjunction with CIA. Mean, that's what that is. And I tried to join the CIA, but I'm not being false about it. I am a sworn enemy of the CIA at this point. No doubt about that. I just wanted a life that was interesting. I wanted to see stuff. Speaker 0: This would all be a lot more believable conspicuous if he hadn't ended up becoming one of the most influential conservative news pundits in American history. Tucker Carlson himself says that he comes from a CIA family and that his father worked for the CIA. Alan MacLeod of Minton Press writes, Richard Carlson is an important journalist and high state official who was appointed by Ronald Reagan as director of the US Information Agency, USIA, which oversees Radio Liberty and Voice of America, which Dick was also the director. Together, these outlets are part of what The New York Times called a worldwide propaganda network built by the CIA. Their goal is to bombard enemy countries with regime change propaganda. Until the nineteen seventies, Radio Free Europe was directly funded by the CIA. Richard Carlson would have been running Voice of America and then the branch of the CIA that oversaw Voice of America at the height of the Cold War, basically the broadcasting wing of the CIA's propaganda machine. Speaker 2: With the backing of CIA, of course, the organization you wanted to join back in the day, as I understand. We should thank God they didn't let you in. Although, it is a serious organization. I understand. My former vis a vis, in the sense that I served in the first main directorate, Soviet Union's intelligence service. Who Speaker 1: blew up Nord Stream? Speaker 2: You for sure. Speaker 1: I was busy that day. Nate, do you have do you I did not blow up Nord Stream. Speaker 2: Thank you though. You personally may have an alibi, but the CIA has no such alibi. Is Speaker 0: it a coincidence the former head of the US intelligence agency and director of voice of liberty for the CIA's son is one of the most influential political pundits in America?
FreyjaTarte
Posted - September 21, 2024 at 1:49 AM
Saved - September 21, 2024 at 6:01 AM

@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™

Wake up America! Globalists are running your country. What are you going to do about it? https://t.co/7zU971Ybyv

myhiddenvalue
Posted - December 28, 2024 at 10:16 AM
Saved - December 28, 2024 at 8:12 PM

@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number

They're committing treason against the United States https://t.co/cHsqh57YHN

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are military and law enforcement individuals frustrated with illegal operations they view as treasonous. This group has a long-term agenda that poses a serious threat. A legal fund is being established to sue corporations under the RICO Act, similar to actions taken against the mafia. There’s urgency for Congress to act quickly, but alternative measures are being pursued. Public pressure is essential; citizens should contact their representatives to advocate for open hearings and witness protection. Disturbingly, there are claims that this covert group has the capability to manipulate natural disasters, posing an existential threat to humanity. The speaker left a lucrative medical career to address these issues after uncovering the truth about these operations.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There are military and law enforcement people who are quite fed up with this, you know, illegal operation that's treasonous. I mean, I'll just be flat out, put it out there. They are committing treason against United States. When I tell you that this group are a bunch of sociopaths and psychopaths capable of this, people need to believe it. And not letting those letting those guys get away with their agenda because this is a 70 year long term plan that they're coming to ahead now, which can be and you can be executed for that, as you know, by federal law. I think there are certain people who are not gonna sit on their hands if the Congress just dithers for another 2, 3, 4 years. Because from a law enforcement point of view, we've been able to prove that these operations are already criminal enterprises. And by the way, anyone who's listening, who is an attorney, we're starting our own legal fund to sue all these corporations for these technologies under the civilian RICO provision, racketeering influence, corrupt organization. It's been used against the mafia. I always point out to people, this organization is the world's largest and deadliest mafia. So you can invoke that RICO Act that was passed in 1970 as a civilian organization, which is what we're about to do. And there are there's a US attorney on our team, federal prosecutor, that when we go to discovery and get evidence, we'll turn over to him. He can do a criminal prosecution at that point. So we're not gonna sit on our hands. Now we're encouraging Congress to move quickly. But in the meanwhile, I can tell you there are things afoot that are gonna go more quickly. So what I'm trying to do is be sure This is why listen. Everyone writing sitting here listening should write to your member of congress and your 2 senators, whatever state you're from, and encourage them to pass these laws protecting the witnesses and to hold open hearings. Because, I don't think we need to continue this process like at the this last small hearing with the 3 guys. We're aggressive. I can't talk about that. I have to be in a SCIF, which is a secure compartment and information facility, top secret facility. No. Because these projects should not be afforded any national security protection since they are being run illegally. I think we should take a much more aggressive stand towards fully open hearings on this, which we've been calling for for 30 years. But I think your listeners have more power than they realize if they were to write their member of Congress, their representative in the House and their 2 senators because they need to hear from the people. They need to hear that the people care about this issue. The most dangerous is their capabilities to, a, stage a alien invasion that would convince everyone it's false, and, b, things that they can do geophysically. What I mean by that is I have a NOC, a non official cover, a guy who's deep cover currently in the system that described this illegal covert group was were able to move an asteroid on a trajectory coming from the sun to skim over the Atlantic Ocean and Pacific, caused massive tidal waves and destruction deliberately. And an ET craft intercepted that and saved our bacon. Now I also know that they have systems that they can put on fault lines off the coast of various landmasses like California and elsewhere, and they can trigger those. And those can cause massive earthquakes and tsunamis. When I tell you that this group are a bunch of sociopaths and psychopaths capable of this, people need to believe it. And not letting those letting those guys get away with their agenda, because this is a 70 year long term plan that they're coming to a ahead now, is a true threat to humans. So that those two areas are the most disturbing, things I have discovered, about this organization or what their plans are and what their capabilities are. And these aren't theoretical capabilities. These are actual ones. So to have an organization that's not being overseen by the people or by Congress or the White House that have those sort of technologies and that kind of malicious intent, We're talking an existential threat to humanity and to our country. And that's why, you know, I left my medical career a few years ago to fix this. Because once I learned what was really happening, I was ready to walk away from, you know, whatever it is, you know, 4 or 5, 600000 a year as a doctor to fix this problem.
IanCarrollx
Posted - February 2, 2025 at 2:03 AM
Saved - February 2, 2025 at 2:28 PM

@IanCarrollx - Ian Carroll Commentary

TUCKER EXPOSES ben shapiro FOR BEING ISRAEL FIRST He is clearly a foreign asset Implanted to destroy the conservative movement and America https://t.co/hrlAdxfqwk

Video Transcript AI Summary
There's a concerning level of emotional instability and neglect regarding domestic issues while some focus intensely on foreign conflicts. With the country facing significant instability and challenges, it's alarming that attention is diverted away from pressing local problems, such as the well-being of our own children. It raises questions about priorities and genuine care for the nation. Additionally, the importance of standing up for free speech, even for those we disagree with, cannot be overstated. This principle is crucial, especially as we navigate immense social pressure and observe reactions from influential figures unhappy with their exclusion from current discussions on diversity and inclusion.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I I don't really care, but I I did think it showed, like, the level of not just corruption, which I knew, but of, like, emotional instability and craziness. I mean, there are people, and I stopped reading any of it, but there are people on the right who have spent the last 2 months every single day focused on a conflict in a foreign country as their own country becomes dangerously unstable on the brink of financial collapse with tens of millions of people who shouldn't be here in the country. We don't know their identities or the purpose of their being here. Like, stuff that's could destroy the country for real and make it impossible for my kids to live here. They've said nothing about that, and they're focused with laser intensity on foreign conflicts. And I'm like, at some point, I've got 4 kids. If I'm so caught up in the problems of my neighbor's children and completely ignoring my own children as they get addicted to drugs and kill themselves, you know, I'm not against helping my neighbor's kids, but clearly, I don't love my kids. I mean, that's that's, you know, that's the only logical conclusion, and they don't care about the country at all. And that's, you know, that's kind of their prerogative, but I do because I have no choice because I'm from here. My family's been here 100 of years. I plan to stay here. Like, I'm shocked by how little they care about the country, and including the person you mentioned. And I I can't imagine how someone like that could get an audience of people who claimed about care about America because he doesn't, obviously. Right? Speaker 1: Right. Well, I mean, Tucker, we've seen it too on free speech. I mean, people who've built become multimillionaires, who've, you know, made entire careers, who've, you know, literally became famous, you know, on this very reason. I know you've spoken about this previously, but it's very important to our audience as well, Is that, you know, standing up for free speech rights of people you do disagree with is just is probably the most important exercise. And we've seen some of that come for American citizens on Palestine. How do you work through this too when we're both under such immense pressure, even social pressure? Like, how could you support this? You know, take maybe the context of the university presidents. We've got billionaires like Bill Ackman, who's they're I I'm curious what you make of this. My assessment is they're upset that they're not included as marginalized within the DEI regime. They claim to be
bennyjohnson
Posted - February 13, 2025 at 9:32 PM
Saved - February 14, 2025 at 12:07 AM

@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson

CNN's Kaitlan Collins spend all day at the White House interrupting Trump with screeching globalist left-wing propaganda. But just a few short years ago Kaitlan Collins was screeching against "globalist left-wing propaganda" on Fox News - !?! Weak people sell their souls in DC https://t.co/d4kgOqpiBL

Video Transcript AI Summary
George Soros is a foreign-born, left-wing individual who aims to change the nature of our country. Leaked memos reveal three key points: a belief in their success at influencing global immigration policy, the refugee crisis as an opportunity to further this influence, and the perception of the refugee crisis as the new normal. Soros is a strong supporter of open borders, advocating for unrestricted movement for all. He views the immigration crisis as a means to advance his broader immigration agenda.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: From our nation's capital. Caitlin, what does that mean? What's George Soros trying to do with the immigration crisis? Speaker 1: Good morning. Okay. So George Soros is this foreign born left wing guy who essentially wants to change the nature of our country. And in this data dump, one of the memos was about the refugee crisis, and they made three points. They think that they've been successful at influencing immigration policy across the world. They think that the refugee crisis is an opportunity to continue doing so, And I think the refugee crisis is the new normal. And George Soros is this guy who is a staunch advocate for open borders. He wants people to be able to go wherever they want, whenever they want, for whatever reason. And for him, he sees this immigration policy, this crisis as a vehicle to further his immigration agenda.
ProjektJncojok
Posted - February 26, 2025 at 10:36 AM
Saved - February 26, 2025 at 12:41 PM

@ProjektJncojok - ⚔️ 𝕆ℝ𝕀𝔾𝕀ℕ𝔸𝕃 𝕁𝕁 ⚔️

🔥This is why Dan Crenshaw hates Tucker Carlson so much!🔥 https://t.co/VKGbbd4pTq

Video Transcript AI Summary
I am insulted that Dan Crenshaw is a congressman and don't think he should be one again. Republican states seem to have the least sincere Republicans. The next time he talks about threats, he should just be quiet. He's a neo con and the most left-wing member of Congress I've ever met. He's a Republican who has no interest in the United States and doesn't even pretend to. People are easily misled by posturing people in Washington, which is why Dan Crenshaw has a job. He focuses on other people's problems while neglecting his own. He is an enemy of everything that you voted for.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Dan Crenshaw cannot be a congressman again. He just can't. It's just too insulting. Why is it that republican states tend to have the least sincere republican? Dan Crenshaw, apparently still a member of congress. And the next time Dan Crenshaw stands up and says, but you don't understand the threat. Shut up, Dan Crenshaw. Just about had it with you. Neo con congressman Dan Crenshaw, Nikki Haley of Texas. The single most left wing member of congress I've ever met personally is a republican from this area who has no interest in The United States whatsoever and does not even pretend. I'm not gonna name names. Yeah. It's Dan Crenshaw. The most liberal, most left wing person I've ever met. And so they're easily bullshitted by the, the posturing jackasses in Washington. That's why Dan Crenshaw has a job. You, Dan Crenshaw, you're the one whose own children languished and died while you focused on the neighbor's kids. That person is an enemy of everything that you voted for.
KMGGaryde
Posted - February 27, 2025 at 9:20 PM
Saved - March 4, 2025 at 11:13 PM

@KMGGaryde - Gary D

Tucker Carlson says the quiet part out loud! 🔥 https://t.co/X6jMgR16CB

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jeffrey Epstein was murdered in the most secure federal lockup in the country, yet there was no real investigation. Attorney General Barr lied about it. Where are the tapes from Epstein's properties? The fact that we can't see them suggests a massive blackmail operation run by intel agencies to control famous people. If someone can kill Epstein in a secure lockup and get away with it, that's a powerful, dangerous force. It's important to talk about it though because we need transparency and honesty. Crimes like this make people feel impotent and paranoid, leading to a society where no one believes anything. We need a country where things are what they seem, where people are honest and admit mistakes, not a place of crazy deceptions and murders.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Bottom line is Jeffrey Epstein was murdered, and not only murdered, but he was murdered in the most secure federal lockup in Midtown Manhattan in the country. Okay, not just in federal lockup, but in the most secure part of federal lockup. So how did that happen? Well, he was clearly murdered by another inmate, you can't get any answers to who the other eight inmates on his block were. There was no investigation into his death, they've never released it, and the attorney general at the time, Attorney General Barr clearly knew that this happened, and I've said that in public and he's attacked me for saying that, but it's just a fact he lied about it. And so what is that? What is that? Think about that for a minute. I don't know the, I mean, there's a lot I don't know, I don't pretend to understand really anything, I don't understand anything, but I know lying when I see it, and they're lying about Jeffrey Epstein, if they're not, where's the investigation? And there hasn't been one, and so that's pretty heavy duty. Where are the tapes? Where are the Epstein tapes? You know, it was so funny, they released a tape, a guy I know actually released a tape of Jeffrey Epstein talking about Donald Trump and saying we were friends once and I don't like Trump, and okay, this was like the October surprise was to derail Trump. And everyone's like, how can you do that? I thought, I'm so glad they're doing that. So let's talk about Jeffrey Epstein. Like where are the videotapes from his home in New Mexico, from his Caribbean island, from his place on Fifth Avenue, there are always videotapes now in federal hands, why can't we see those? And we can't see them of course, because it's like a massive blackmail operation run by various intel agencies designed to put famous people under the control of governments. Of course, that's what it was. Obviously, and everyone knows that, but no one can say anything about it. And as a friend of mine said, we were talking about this one night, and he goes, you know, kind of if you think about it like if you're able to kill somebody in the secure block in federal lockup in Manhattan and get away with it, probably not someone you wanna dick around with. Like, that's a powerful force, and that's a fair point, but it's still worth saying out loud because it's worth living in a transparent, honest country. It's bad to have rot like that. It's bad to have crimes like that committed in front of our faces. We can't do anything about it. It makes everyone feel impotent. It makes everyone paranoid. It makes everyone feel like nothing's on the level. We wind up with a society where no one believes anything. And I feel like that's where we are. The number of people I know who are like, wow, I've become a really deranged conspiracy theorist who doesn't believe in the moon landing. I must know 100 people who said that to me in the last two years. This is and trust me, if you don't feel that way, you're just not admitting it because you do feel that way if you're paying attention. And that's a bad way to feel. I don't think I don't you don't want a country like that. You want a country where things are pretty much what they seem to be, where people are honest, they're straightforward. When they make a terrible mistake, they admit it. You want a country that is like the family that you have or want to have, where people are just direct with each other and kind to each other, and not everything is some crazy multilayered deception designed to you know, screw you or kill Jeffrey Epstein, like that's so dark.
eduneret
Posted - March 7, 2025 at 10:46 PM
Saved - March 10, 2025 at 3:31 AM

@eduneret - Eduardo Neret

@TuckerCarlson A few months ago, I asked Tucker about the fall of Assad. He told me it made him “so sad,” and added that he was “enraged by it.” “Why was I supposed to hate Assad again…Seemed like a fine guy to me. Oh, he’s a murderer. As compared to whom?” https://t.co/5XQ26qUpO9

Video Transcript AI Summary
It makes me sad and enraged to see Protestant Christian churches in the US ignoring the murder and oppression of Christians in the Middle East. I'm triggered by the lack of outrage, especially when churches are attacked. US tax dollars shouldn't fund the murder of Christians, and religious leaders need to take a stand. I'm also concerned about regime change wars. Syria isn't some remote country; it's strategically vital. If you're going to intervene, you need to replace the old regime with something better. We haven't done that, and I can't believe we keep making the same mistake. Why was I supposed to hate Assad? Now he's gone. The media just blindly adopts political strategies as moral imperatives, like The New York Times doing the bidding of the CIA.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's the situation a year from now? Speaker 1: Makes me so sad. Yeah. It just makes me so sad. I was reading I hate to say this. It sounds so promising, but I actually was reading first Peter last night and and, you know, in it, it's in every epistle in every book of the New Testament. It's like, you're gonna suffer. There's gonna be persecution of Christians, like badge of honor. Sign, you're doing the right thing. And I and I believe that as a Christian. However, I'm enraged by it, and I'm enraged, enraged by Protestant Christian churches. I am a Protestant Christian, and I believe it, and I always will be a and I'm proud to be a Protestant. However, Protestant Christian churches in The United States totally ignoring the murder of Christians in The Middle East, I just can't the oppression of Christians, I can't handle it. It makes me so angry. And, I don't know why that just triggers me, and maybe it's just me. But, when the church and the nativity got shot up, in the early two thousands, I'll never forget it. I was at CNN. I was so mad. No one's saying anything. Yeah. You're shooting into the church where on the site where Jesus was born. Really? And American Christians are like, no. Really? It's important because Hamas is like, whatever it was at the time. You are not allowed to use US tax dollars to murder and oppress Christians, period. 67% of this country's Christian. That is outrageous. And until Christian religious leaders say, look. You know, we have may have views on this or that Middle Eastern conflict, but the one thing we're on is you cannot use US tax dollars to murder Christians. They are no threat to anybody, and that's, you know, that's true in Pakistan. That's true in Iraq, and I've met Christians in all these countries. Pakistan, Iraq, threat to Levant. You can't do that to Christians, period, until Mike Johnson, who's always telling everybody how Christian he is, until he says that and the people like him say that is gonna continue. So so on that level, I'm personally really distressed. I think I have a right to be distressed. But on another, it's like another regime change war. Can I just make one point, like, super autistic obvious point that no one's making? Syria is not Iraq. It's it's on the Mediterranean. It's the Levant. It's in the middle of freaking Europe. It's right across the water from I mean, this is, like, in the heart of everything. People don't I really think geography plays a massive role in everything, and I'm interested in it. Syria is right there. It's not Libya. It's not Somalia. It's ringer Italy. Like, are you joking to create chaos there? And, you know, I'm basically against regime change on many levels, practical and ideological, except in extreme cases, but I'm they have to be pretty extreme. But if you're gonna have regime change, then change the freaking regime. Just carve up the country. Who's in charge? I saw this in Iraq with my own eyes. I was there. You knock off the dictator. That's easy. Driving Assad to Moscow wasn't that hard. It took three days. Killing Saddam was not that hard. What's hard is to rebuild authority, credible authority that can manage a fractious country like Syria or Iraq or any country. They're all fractious. United States is. It's hard to manage these places. If you're gonna break something, replace it with something better or something. And the fact that we did that again with our allies is I I it's hard to believe that just happened. Yeah. Yeah. I just can't even believe it. And the last thing I'll say is, tell me now that he's gone and in Moscow and in disgrace and shame and has lost his country. Why was I supposed to hate Assad again? Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: Why I supposed to have any feeling whatsoever for Assad, which I never did? Seemed like a fine guy to me. Oh, he's a murderer as compared to whom? Speaker 0: And also, like, civil wars don't that's the other thing that I found gross about the reporting after, you know, he fled the country or whatever. Like, CNN, every every outlet was saying, oh, who butchered it or, like, heinous crimes, but they don't even actually bother in the reporting to list them. And so I'm not defending Assad. I'm sure he's done some bad things like everybody else has you say, but, like, if it's so clear and obvious, like, just list them in your article. Speaker 1: Like, This is a product of grand strategy. These were decisions made at a level, you know, in some ways above government, but wherever it was made, the decision was made under the Obama administration that Osad must go. So they're like, okay. Osad must go because they've got a whole plan for the region or whatever, which may or may not be valid. But for The US media just to adopt a political strategy as, like, a moral imperative, like, now one minute, Assad's wife is on the cover of Vogue. The next minute, you have to hate her as a war criminal because Hillary Clinton decides that, you know, Israel wants the area above Golan or whatever the goal was or we want the oil or we wanna help the Kurds or whatever the imperatives were. And then the media, like, adopts that as some sort of, like, more like, it's a moral crime to disagree? Are you joking? These are all regime outlets. I mean, actual regime outlets. Like, The New York Times is filled with people who are doing the bidding of the CIA
nesta_red
Posted - April 27, 2025 at 6:03 PM
Saved - November 11, 2025 at 7:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I observe a recurring claim that mainstream opposition is fake, a puppet show for the Elitarian rulers who seek total control. Across posts, I’m told both sides push the same agenda—AI governance, surveillance, vaccines, war—while real issues like Epstein, CDC, and media are hidden. The message: beware the illusion of choice; power remains centralized.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian Masters. As such they keep on fooling the ...: https://tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=The%20Parasitic%20System%202023-12-13:%20Lets%20Deflate%20the%20Parasitic%20System!&relationship=All&drsid=0&pisid=0&page=1#tm_fakeopp

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tumia March 2024 explains that deflation is needed because of fake controlled opposition—illusory puppets pretending to oppose the illiterion puppets on the other side, but in fact both sides advancing the same agenda of totalitarian control for their illiterion masters. This structure fooling the people hides the most important truths and pushes the totalitarian control agenda of their illiterion masters. The argument continues that without deflating this parasitic system, fake, controlled opposition will always be bribed and/or blackmailed to effectively keep control of the narrative and the people’s perception. In large-scale systems, there is no real democratic choice and there never will be. The proposed solution is: “Let’s deflate the parasitic system.” David Ick is cited: “Trump doubles down on support for COVID fake vaccines and boosters despite outcry from conservatives.” The speaker asks, “Are you getting it yet Trump supporters?” and contends, “He was a fraud all along as I have said since 2016 and he has been leading you to glorious failure for the masters that own him.” The assertion is that no politician will get us out of this, and “We have to do it.” Catherine Austin Fitz is referenced: “Trump put $10 billion dollars into a program to depopulate The US.” The message ends with an instruction to “Please like and follow,” and provides the source: tumia.org.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tumia March 2024. Why deflate? Because of fake controlled opposition. Fake opposition, illiterion puppets pretending to oppose the illiterion puppets on the other side, but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of totalitarian control and for their controlling illiterion masters. As such, they keep on fooling the people, hiding the most important truths and advance more and more the totalitarian control agenda of their illiterion masters. Why deflate? Otherwise, fake, controlled opposition will always be bribed and or blackmailed to effectively keep control of the narrative, the people's perception. So in these large scale systems, there is no real democratic choice and there never will be. What's the solution then? Let's deflate the parasitic system. David Ick, Trump doubles down on support for COVID fake vaccines and boosters despite outcry from conservatives. Are you getting it yet Trump supporters? He was a fraud all along as I have said since 2016 and he has been leading you to glorious failure for the masters that own him. No politician is going to get us out of this. We have to do it. Catherine Austin Fitz, Trump put $10 billion dollars into a program to depopulate The US. Please like and follow. Source, tumia.org.
the parasitic system 2023-12-13: lets deflate the parasitic system! @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 the parasitic system 2023-12-13: lets deflate the parasitic system! @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 tumia.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

If I extrapolate my estimate for 2022 to 2023 and 2024 I get in total 41milj excess deaths since the covid gentech "vax" rollout. Adding the 9milj from the covid killing protocols in 2020 gives a total of 50milj excess deaths (for 5 yrs). By country(47): https://tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=Covid%20World%202022-10-09:%203%20Years%20of%20Cov-Vaccine%20Bioweapons:%20Estimated%20Extra%20Deaths%2031M-Adv.%20Eff.%201.9B&relationship=All&drsid=0&pisid=0&page=1

Video Transcript AI Summary
The article COVID world 10/09/2022 presents estimates of extra deaths and serious adverse effects attributable to a three-year period of SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bioweapons. The 10/09/2022 estimates report thirty-one million extra deaths and one point nine billion serious adverse effects over three years. Two main differences with the previous estimates (10/01/2022) are: first, eleven countries, for about 600,000,000 people, were added to the estimate base data, making the current estimate base data consist of 47 countries for about 2,300,000,000 people; second, for estimating serious adverse effects the extra deaths of 2021 and 2022 are taken fully into account as input instead of half in the previous estimates. The extra deaths estimates for 2020, 2021, and 2022 are based on officially reported and factual deaths in the countries listed in the table, with sources from Our World in Data (appendix references). Extra deaths (ED for 2020, ED21 for 2021, and ED22 for 2022) are calculated as the difference between the factual total deaths in the concerned year. Missing months of the incomplete 2022 year are estimated by extrapolating the monthly average of all known months from January 2021 onward. The yearly evolution uses a corrected average of the five preceding years (2015 to 2019). The yearly correction factor is 0.75%, calculated from the evolution of the sum of deaths of all countries from 2015 to 2019. For 2020 ED the correction factor 0.75% was applied three times (reference year 2017) to the five-year average; for 2021 ED, four times; for 2022 ED, five times. The extra deaths estimates thus reflect excess deaths after correcting for expected yearly evolution and expected yearly without the mass vaccination and COVID bioweapons. To compute the world totals: for 2020 ED, the ED100 ks extra deaths per 100k people by country are calculated and aggregated to 112 extra deaths per 100k people, applied to the world population to yield nine million extra deaths in 2020, the first year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. For 2021 ED, the ED21M doses (extra deaths per million doses) are calculated and aggregated to 961 extra deaths per million doses, applied to global doses to yield twelve point one million extra deaths in 2021, the first year with the vaccine bioweapon and second year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. For 2022 ED, the ED22M doses (extra deaths per million doses) are calculated and aggregated to 763 extra deaths per million doses, applied to global doses to yield nine point six million extra deaths in 2022, the second year with the vaccine bioweapon and third year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. The estimate for people with serious adverse effects is calculated by multiplying the estimated extra deaths in 2021 and 2022 by an estimated ratio of reported adverse effects to reported deaths after COVID vaccination, which is 87.6, derived from a table of estimated probabilities after COVID vaccination for all ages. This results in an estimated one point one billion serious adverse effects for 2021 and zero point eight billion for 2022. Considering the estimated thirty-one million extra deaths and estimated one point nine billion serious adverse effects for three years, the text asserts that terms such as bioweaponized, propagandized, lured, coerced and mandated depopulation and genocide should not be taboo. It further posits about ten million extra deaths yearly worldwide since 2020, projecting one hundred ten million extra deaths by the end of 2030 if these trends continue. The text acknowledges that if data are far off target or data are faulty, the current estimates and trends could be seriously unvalidated. It attributes censorship and a lack of truthful science in mainstream media and tech platforms to propounding that SARS CoV-two is naturally evolved, while claiming truthful science proves SARS CoV-two is designed and made by humans in a biolab. It asserts that the genetic code of SARS CoV-two contains lab-made inserts (PRRA, HIVGP120) that are too large and too numerous, and that these inserts only appear in other natural viruses that are genetically distant. It references a substantial trail of documents and testimonies before and after the release of SARS CoV-two about these genetic codes and the needed biochemical technology, including financing, scientific documents, and patents. Specific sources and figures are noted, including Doctor Richard Fleming, MD, sworn testimony that COVID-19 is a bioweapon; Doctor Fleming on Montanier's discovery of HIV and spiked protein; Veritas Revelation Project materials; and claims that the virus comes from a lab. It also mentions Genentech COVID vaccines causing human cells to produce large amounts of toxic spike protein in multiple organs and tissues, and asserts these vaccines are bioweapons with additional components and contaminations causing health damage. The article is attributed to Pak Osmol, dated 10/09/2022, with Appendix A citing Our World in Data Excess Mortality Raw Death Count as the data source.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: COVID world 10/09/2022, estimated extra deaths thirty one million and estimated serious adverse effects one point nine billion for three years of SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bioweapons. The two main differences with the previous estimates on 10/01/2022 are the following: First, 11 countries, for about 600,000,000 people, were added to the estimate base data. As such, the current estimate base data consists of 47 countries for about 2,300,000,000 people. This makes the current estimates more representative for the whole world. Second, for estimating the serious adverse effects the extra deaths of 2021 and 2022 are taken fully into account as input instead of half in the previous estimates. The extra deaths estimates for 2020, 2021, and 2022 are based on officially reported and factual deaths in the countries mentioned in the table below. For the source of all the used data see the Our World and Data links in the appendix. Extra deaths (see columns twenty twenty ED, twenty twenty one ED, and twenty twenty two ED in the table below) are calculated as the difference of the factual number of total deaths in the concerned year. The missing months of the incomplete 2022 year are estimated by extrapolation of the monthly average of all known months from January 2021 on. The for yearly evolution corrected average of the five preceding years 2015 to 2019. The yearly correction factor used is 0.75% and was calculated based on the evolution of the sum of deaths of all countries below in 2015 to 2019. For the 2020 ED estimate the correction factor 0.75 was three times (reference year twenty seventeen) applied on the five year average, for 2021 ED four times and for 2022 ED five times. In other words, the extra deaths estimates are in fact the excess deaths after correction for an expected yearly evolution and expected yearly without the mass vaccination and COVID bioweapons. Then to calculate the 2020 ED estimate for the world, first the column ED100 ks extra deaths per 100 ks people of the country is calculated. Then this column is aggregated which results in 112 extra deaths per 100 ks people. The latter value is applied on the world population which results into nine million extra deaths in 2020, the first year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. To calculate the 2021 ED estimate for the world, first the column ED21M doses, extra deaths per million doses given in the country, is calculated. This column is aggregated which results in nine sixty one extra deaths per million doses. The latter value is applied on the world doses which results into twelve point one million extra deaths in 2021, the first year with the vaccine bioweapon and second year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. To calculate the 2022 ED estimate for the world, first the column ED22M doses, extra deaths per million doses given in the country, is calculated. This column is aggregated which results in seven sixty three extra deaths per million doses. The latter value is applied on the world doses which results into nine point six million extra deaths in 2022, the second year with the vaccine bioweapon and third year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. Press CTRL plus four more image detail below. The estimate for people with serious adverse effects is calculated by multiplying the estimated extra deaths in 2021 and 2022 by an estimated ratio reported adverse effectsreported deaths after COVID vaccination. The ratio used is 87.6 and was calculated from the table Estimated probabilities after COVID vaccination for all ages in the article below. This results in an estimated one point one billion serious adverse effects for 2021 and zero point eight billion for 2022. Considering the estimated thirty one million extra deaths and estimated one point nine billion serious adverse effects for three years of deployed SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bioweapons the words bioweaponized, propagandized, lured, coerced and mandated depopulation and genocide should not be taboo. Furthermore, there are about ten million extra deaths yearly worldwide since 2020. If these extra deaths are continued this will result in one hundred and ten million extra deaths by the end of 2030 from these bioweapons since 2020. For the sake of estimating, certain assumptions about the domain were introduced. If one or some of those assumptions would be far off target, for example as more data becomes available and is integrated in the estimation or some data appears faulty, the current estimates and trends could be seriously unvalidated. Because of the mass propaganda, corrupted science, lack of truthful science and censorship in the mainstream media and on tech platforms, thus the elites, many people still think SARS CoV-two is a naturally evolved virus. Truthful science though proves beyond any doubt SARS CoV-two is designed and made by humans in a biolab. After all and first of all, science shows the genetic code of SARS CoV-two contains several lab made inserts, not natural mutations or recombinations of natural viruses. Because these inserted codes PRRA (HIVGP120) are much too large and too many, and because these genetic codes only appear in other natural viruses that are genetically much too different from SARS CoV-two, the probability that SARS CoV-two has naturally mutated or recombined from other natural viruses is quasi zero. Furthermore, there exists a substantial trail of documents and testimonies, years before and after the release of SARS CoV-two about these genetic codes and the existing biochemical technology needed to insert them, financing of the research, scientific documents, patents. See the links below for sources and science. Doctor. Richard M. Fleming, MD, sworn testimony that COVID-nineteen is a bioweapon. Doctor. Richard Fleming on Montanier's discovery of HIV and spiked protein. The virus comes from a lab, appears from the Veritas Revelation Project. Are our scientists lying to us? SARS CoV-two is likely a lab construct. The origin of SARS CoV-two. Since the Genentech COVID vaccines make the human body cells produced during months up to years huge amounts of the toxic spike protein of SARS CoV-two, In fact in all organs and tissues much greater amounts than the average, dominantly only mucosal, infection with SARS CoV-two itself which for the majority of healthy unvaccinated people causes hardly any illness, just cold like symptoms, these Genentech COVID vaccines are of course themselves bioweapons and much worse than the virus itself. Furthermore, not only the produced toxic spike protein but also other components and contaminations of these vaccines are cause of serious health damage. See the links below for information about the devastating effects of the COVID vaccine bioweapons. Images, press CTRL plus for more image detail. The article COVID World 10/09/2022, estimated extra deaths thirty one million and estimated serious adverse effects 1,900,000,000 for three years of SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bioweapons was written by Pak Osmol, 10/09/2022. Appendix A Data Source. Our World in Data Excess Mortality Raw Death Count. Click the Download tab below the graph on the displayed page. Downloaded CSV September 2022 from Our World in Data Excess Mortality Raw Death Count. Right click the link and then Save Link As.
covid world 2022-10-09: 3 years of cov-vaccine bioweapons: estimated extra deaths 31m-adv. eff. 1.9b @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 covid world 2022-10-09: 3 years of cov-vaccine bioweapons: estimated extra deaths 31m-adv. eff. 1.9b @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 tumia.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

If I extrapolate my estimate for 2022 to 2023+half of 2024 I get in total 36mil excess deaths since the covid "vax" rollout. Adding the 9mil from the covid killing protocols in 2020 gives a total of 44mil (4.5 yrs). By country(47): https://rumble.com/v4g1d6o-estimated-31mil-excess-deaths-1.9bil-adverse-effects-for-3-yrs-of-sars-cov-.html https://tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=Covid%20World%202022-10-09:%203%20Years%20of%20Cov-Vaccine%20Bioweapons:%20Estimated%20Extra%20Deaths%2031M-Adv.%20Eff.%201.9B&relationship=All&drsid=0&pisid=0&page=1

Estimated 31mil Excess Deaths+1.9bil Adverse Effects for 3 Yrs of Sars-Cov-2+Vaccine Bioweapons Covid World 2022-10-09: Estimated Extra Deaths 31 Million and Estimated Serious Adverse Effects 1.9 Billion for 3 Years of Covid Killing Protocols, Sars-Cov-2 Virus and Vaccine Bioweapons: https://tum rumble.com
covid world 2022-10-09: 3 years of cov-vaccine bioweapons: estimated extra deaths 31m-adv. eff. 1.9b @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 covid world 2022-10-09: 3 years of cov-vaccine bioweapons: estimated extra deaths 31m-adv. eff. 1.9b @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 tumia.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@SteviesQuotes Nep-oppositie is van alle tijden en geen toeval:

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Nep-oppositie: elitaire marionetten die doen alsof ze zich verzetten tegen de elitaire marionetten aan de andere kant ... . Audio-video versie (Engels): https://rumble.com/v575riz-fake-opposition-elitarian-puppets-pretending-to-oppose.html Geschreven versie (Engels): https://tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=The%20Parasitic%20System%202023-12-13:%20Lets%20Deflate%20the%20Parasitic%20System!&relationship=All&drsid=0&pisid=0&page=1#tm_fakeopp

the parasitic system 2023-12-13: lets deflate the parasitic system! @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 the parasitic system 2023-12-13: lets deflate the parasitic system! @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 tumia.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Nep-oppositie: elitaire marionetten die doen alsof ze zich verzetten tegen de elitaire marionetten aan de andere kant ... . Audio-video versie (Engels): https://rumble.com/v575riz-fake-opposition-elitarian-puppets-pretending-to-oppose.html Geschreven versie (Engels): https://tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=The%20Parasitic%20System%202023-12-13:%20Lets%20Deflate%20the%20Parasitic%20System!&relationship=All&drsid=0&pisid=0&page=1#tm_fakeopp

the parasitic system 2023-12-13: lets deflate the parasitic system! @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 the parasitic system 2023-12-13: lets deflate the parasitic system! @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 tumia.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@TPV_John - The Patriot Voice

It looks like the whole “MAHA” deal was just a clever cover for bringing in total AI governance into healthcare and FDA oversight… What? You thought that MAHA would be the END of mRNA COVID jabs, and a return to a truly healthier America? THINK AGAIN.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@EtienneJansen - Etienne Jansen

@SecKennedy Why are NRNA and MMR biochemical weapons still used today as we speak?!

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

RFK Jr. knows the COVID death jabs constitute mass murder. He’s called them “mass murder” verbatim. He’s now in a position of authority where he can halt them unilaterally, without any action from FDA. He must stop the “mass murder” Trump started.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The attorney (Speaker 0) opens by expressing frustration that pandemic-era liability protections—the PREP Act, the CARE Act, and the 1986 VICA Vaccine Act—grant broad immunity to the actors involved, effectively shielding them from liability and allowing what he calls “mass murder.” He asks Sacha whether there are obvious legal avenues to sue Pfizer and obtain redress for what he views as illegal acts, given this shield of immunity. Sacha (Speaker 1) replies that neither he nor his colleagues discourage attempts to sue Pfizer due to the fraud allegations they’ve identified. He notes, however, that nobody knows exactly what will break through the immunity barrier, so they should try different approaches. He outlines the current landscape: the defense Pfizer will likely raise is that they did not defraud the government, but merely delivered fraud that the government ordered. He references a concrete example in Brooke Jackson’s case, where Pfizer filed a motion to dismiss in April, arguing the fraud claim centered on delivering government-ordered fraud rather than perpetrating it independently. Sacha emphasizes that while the case may be dismissed, it has not been yet. If a future dismissal occurs, the admission would be valuable, and the goal is to elicit admissions in court. He suggests that they need to prove, by any admissible method, that there was explicit U.S. government policy to commit mass murder and genocide, or that certain individuals—Robert Kodlek, Peter Marks, Fauci, and others—were rogue actors acting outside their authority. In other words, the objective is to obtain explicit statements or admissions that could substantiate claims of government-directed action or unauthorized conduct by specific individuals, to challenge the immunity and pursue redress.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. Well, I'm gonna let you go, Sacha. But before I do, I'm an attorney. I try to figure out ways to sue people like this. And, you know, the one of the frustrating things during this pandemic is that the PREP Act, the CARE Act, and the 1986 VICA Vaccine Act have all bestowed broad immunity from liability under all of these actors. So they're getting away literally with murder, with AM, with mass murder. They're getting away with it because they have been given this bubble of this shield of immunity from liability. You have an expertise in corporate liability. As a corporate liability officer, do you see any obvious ways where somebody like me can file a lawsuit and get redressed for some of these, illegal acts? Speaker 1: Yeah. So, first of all, neither me nor my colleagues, discourage anyone from doing just that, to just going after Pfizer because of all the fraud that they have committed. I think what the the problem is we're all having, we don't know exactly what's going to crack that that wall, but we have to attempt different ways. Now the yes, we can try going after Pfizer. I'm just saying, you know, here's the lay of the land. This is the the defense they're going to invoke. They already invoked it in Brooke Jackson's case. They're saying we did not defraud the government. We delivered the fraud that the government ordered. And that's a even Speaker 0: Which gay oh, in Brooke Jackson. Speaker 1: In Brooke Jackson's in April, they filed motion to dismiss. So and while, you know, the case may be dismissed it hasn't been dismissed. But in let's say in the future, it gets dismissed because because of this. That admission alone is priceless, and we need to elicit these admissions in court. They need to tell us ultimately ultimately through whatever method we're going to to go after. Ultimately, they they need to tell us it's an explicit US government policy to commit mass murder and genocide, or these were rogue actors, these people, Robert Kodlek, Peter Marx, you know, Fauci, whoever. You know, these specific individuals, they were rogue actors and acting outside of their authority. Speaker 0: So

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

RFK Jr. knows the COVID death jabs constitute mass murder. He’s called them “mass murder” verbatim. He’s now in a position of authority where he can halt them unilaterally, without any action from FDA. He must stop the “mass murder” Trump started.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@MODUSCUNTO - MR. NICE GUY (really trying) - d0xC

@AdameMedia

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@TPV_John - The Patriot Voice

This is a MASSIVE DISTRACTION from the fact that Trump is getting absolutely GRILLED on all sides for teaming up with Palantir to create a database of all Americans. What better way to attempt to get people to stop talking about that, than to share something absolutely fringe and outlandish on his official Truth Social account. People will now forget about the digital prison being constructed for them, chasing mindless rabbit holes about Biden. See how easy that was?

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@HighImpactFlix - HighImpactFlix

NEW VIDEO: Trump just handed TOTAL CONTROL over EVERY AMERICAN to a private company.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@DrLoupis__ - Dr. Anastasia Maria Loupis

What's going on?

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake opposition of fo actually cooperate to create real sources for division+hate between people. Fe open borders for mass immigration, war, ... . Lets deflate their system and handle those real sources with care+love. See parent tweet video+its replies.

@NightwatchN8 - Nightwatch N8

The two party illusion is the biggest time-waster on the planet

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake opposition of fo actually cooperate to create real sources for division+hate between people. Fe open borders for mass immigration, war, ... . Lets deflate their system and handle those real sources with care+love. See parent tweet video+its replies.

@deSunShineBand - CS

Markeer dit. Bewaar dit. Onthoud dit. Kijk er vaak naar. Leer het. Begrijp het. Pak het vast. Geloof het. En vergeet het nooit. Nooit. Dit is de waarheid. De waarheid die voor je verborgen wordt gehouden. De MSM willen nooit dat je de waarheid weet. Ze willen oorlog. En de dood.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that this is not an attack by Putin on Ukraine in the way it is commonly framed. The speaker references 1990, stating that on 02/09/1990 James Baker III told Mikhail Gorbachev that NATO would not move eastward if Germany unified, and that Gorbachev agreed, ending World War II. The speaker asserts that the US then cheated starting in 1994 when Clinton signed off on a plan to expand NATO all the way to Ukraine, marking the rise of the neocons and identifying Clinton as the first agent of this. NATO expansion began in 1999 with Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic, at which point Russia did not see a direct threat. The speaker notes the US-led bombing of Serbia in 1999 as problematic, describing it as NATO bombing Belgrade for seventy-eight straight days to break the country apart, which Russia did not like. Putin became president, and the Russians initially tolerated and complained but were largely subdued. The speaker claims Putin started out pro-European and pro-American, even suggesting joining NATO when there was some mutual respect. After 9/11 and the Afghan conflict, Russia supported the effort to root out terror. Two decisive actions are highlighted: in 2002, the United States unilaterally withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, described as perhaps the most decisive event rarely discussed in this context. This led to the US placing missile systems in Eastern Europe, which Russia views as a direct threat. The speaker mentions a soft regime change operation in Ukraine in 2004-2005, followed by Yanukovych winning the election in 2009 and becoming president in 2010 on the basis of neutrality for Ukraine. This calmed tensions because the US was pushing NATO, while Ukrainian public opinion reportedly did not want NATO membership, citing a divided country between ethnic Ukrainians and ethnic Russians and a desire to stay away from certain conflicts. In 02/22/2014, the United States allegedly participated in the overthrow of Yanukovych, described as a typical US regime change operation. The Russians supposedly intercepted a call between Victoria Nuland (then at the State Department, now at Columbia University) and Jeffrey Piot, the US ambassador to Ukraine, discussing who would be in the next government. The speaker asserts that after these events, the US said NATO would enlarge, while Putin repeatedly warned to stop, noting that promises were made not to enlarge NATO. Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia are listed as having joined NATO in 2004, before the broader enlargement. The speaker accuses the US of rejecting the basic idea of not expanding NATO to Russia’s border while placing missile systems after breaking a treaty, including walking out of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty in 2019. On 12/15/2021, Putin allegedly proposed a draft Russia-US security agreement with no NATO enlargement, which the speaker says he communicated to the White House, urging negotiations to avoid war. The speaker claims Jake Sullivan asserted an open-door policy for NATO enlargement, calling it “bullshit,” and asserts that they refused negotiations, leading to the special military operation, with Zelensky offering neutrality and Western leaders pushing Ukraine to fight, resulting in “600,000 deaths now of Ukrainians.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is not an attack by Putin on Ukraine in the way that we are told every day. This started in 1990. 02/09/1990, James Baker the third, our secretary of state, said to Mikhail Gorbachev, NATO will not move one inch eastward if you agree to German unification, basically ending World War two. And, Gorbachev said that's very important. Yes. NATO doesn't move, and we agree to German unification. The US then cheated on this already starting in 1994 when Clinton signed off on a, basically, a plan to expand NATO all the way to Ukraine. This is when the so called neocons took power, and, Clinton was the first agent of this. And the expansion of NATO started in 1999 with Poland, Hungary, and Czech Republic. At that point, Russia didn't much care. There was no border other than with the Konigsberg, but other than that, there was no direct threat. Then, The US, led the bombing of Serbia in 1999. That was bad, by the way, because that was a use of NATO to bomb a European capital, Belgrade, seventy eight straight days to break the country apart. The Russians didn't like that very much. But Putin became president. They swallowed it. They complained. But, even Putin started out pro European, pro American actually asked, maybe we should join NATO when there was still the idea of some kind of mutually respectful relationship. Then nine eleven came, then came Afghanistan, and the Russians said, yeah, we'll support you. We understand to root out terror. But then came two other decisive actions. In 2002, The United States unilaterally walked out of the anti ballistic missile treaty. This was probably the most decisive event never discussed in this context, But what it did was trigger The US putting in missile systems in Eastern Europe that Russia views as a dire direct threat. In 02/1945, we engaged in a soft regime change operation in Ukraine. But in 2009, Yanukovych won the election, and he became president in 2010 on the basis of neutrality for Ukraine. That calmed things down because The US was pushing NATO, but the people of Ukraine on the opinion polls didn't even wanna be a NATO. They knew that the country is divided between ethnic Ukrainian, ethnic Russian. What do we want with this? We wanna stay away from your problems. So in 02/22/2014, The United States participated actively in the overthrow of Yanukovych, A typical US regime change operation, have no doubt about it. And the Russians did us a favor. They intercepted a really ugly call between Victoria Nuland, my colleague at Columbia University now, between her and, The US ambassador to Ukraine, Jeffrey Piot, who's a senior state department official till today, and they talked about regime change. They said, who's gonna be the next government? All of this is to say, The US then said, okay. Now NATO's really gonna enlarge, and Putin kept saying, stop. You promised no NATO enlargement. It's been, by the way, I forgot to mention in 2004, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovia, Slovakia, Slovenia, seven more countries in the not one inch eastward. And then okay. It's a long story, but The US kept rejecting the basic idea, don't expand NATO to Russia's border in a context where we're putting in goddamn missile systems after breaking a treaty. 2019, we walked out of the intermediate nuclear force treaty. On 12/15/2021, Putin put on the table a draft Russia US security agreement. You can find it online. The basis of it is no NATO enlargement. I called the White House that next week after that, begging them, take the negotiations. Putin's offered something. Avoid this war. Oh, Jeff, there's not gonna be a war. Announce that NATO's not gonna enlarge. Oh, don't worry. NATO's not gonna enlarge. I said, oh, you're gonna have a war over something that's not gonna happen? Why don't you announce them? He said, no. No. Our policy is an open door. This is Jake Sullivan. Our policy is an open door policy. Open door for NATO enlargement. That is under the category of bullshit, by the way. You don't have your right to put your military bases anywhere you want and expect peace in this world. They turned down the negotiations, then the special military operation started, and five days later, Zelensky says, okay. Okay. Neutrality. And then The United States and Britain said, no way. You guys fight on. We got your back. We don't have your front. You're all gonna die. But we got your back as we kept pushing them into the front lines. That's 600,000 deaths now of Ukrainians since Boris Johnson flew to Kyiv to tell them to be brave.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake opposition of fo actually cooperate to create real sources for division+hate between people. Fe open borders for mass immigration, war,.. . Lets not take their trap solution+handle those real sources with care+love. See parent tweet video+its replies.

@Spiro_Ghost - Spiro

To those calling for the military to be deployed to LA... That is EXACTLY what the ones pulling the strings want! Problem - Reaction - Solution... Don't fall for it!

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@RealDrJaneRuby - DR JANE RUBY™️

🚨‼️🚨BREAKING: THIS FILTHY LYING MURDERER KENNEDY'S FDA JUST APPROVED Merck’s RSV Shot for NEWBORNS -- 12% Of The Newborns Suffered Serious Adverse Events, Including DEATH Let me explain for those unfamiliar with pharmaceutical drug development. A Rate Of >2% SAEs Greater Than Placebo IS A NO GO!!!!! The rate of newborn death from RSV, is listed as 1/28. The SAE/Death rate from this shot is 1/11. Newborns are TWICE as likely to die from the shot as the infection. Results posted at http://ClinicalTrials.gov included serious neurological adverse reactions! Those of you listed here continue to suck his up to Kennedy's butt while he is murdering children FFS!! The murder of American babies must end now!!! @ChildrensHD @MdBreathe @RWMaloneMD @BusyDrT @DrMakaryFDA @SecKennedy @BretWeinstein @maryhollandnyc

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@RealDrJaneRuby - DR JANE RUBY™️

How can @RWMaloneMD vote objectively on vaccine recommendations at @US_FDA when he owns patents and other business interests in vaccines, especially mRNA injections? @wapo @washingtonpost @SecKennedy @NicoleShanahan @realDonaldTrump

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@RealDrJaneRuby - DR JANE RUBY™️

Let's see how this tweet ages... June 18, 2025: I predict the new Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices ACIP that was recently appointed by @SecKennedy to review vaccines WILL RECOMMEND (aka approve) the Self-Amplifying mRNA shots 👀

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@RealDrJaneRuby - DR JANE RUBY™️

🚨 ALERT: @SenRandPaul's COVID CRIME AMNESTY AND APOLOGY TOUR HAS BEGUN Like all 535 members, Sen Paul is a walking pus filled corrupted piece of self-enriching traitorous scum who is re-installed over and over by the machine.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@RealDrJaneRuby - DR JANE RUBY™️

BREAKING: Kennedy’s ACIP vaccine advisory concluded the meeting today with, "mRNA vaccines ARE SAFE" If you don't see the real problem, we'll never find the real solution

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@ricwe123 - Richard

The CIA Director smirks and exhales like a man watching his plan fall perfectly into place as Trump rolls out yet another round of weapons for Ukraine. John Ratcliffe’s face says it all,this was the plan all along. The Deep State hasn’t lost an ounce of control, and Trump is just another puppet parroting their agenda. Exactly the kind of predictable move Putin saw coming a mile away.....

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states that there are plans to send more weapons to Ukraine, confirming that the country will receive additional arms. The speaker emphasizes that this action is necessary: “We have to. They they have to be able to defend themselves.” The speaker asserts that Ukraine is being attacked and hit hard, describing the situation with repetition to underscore the intensity: “They're getting hit very hard now,” followed by “They're getting hit very hard.” The speaker reiterates the need for further weapon deliveries, saying, “We're gonna have to send more weapons.” The emphasis is on defensive capabilities, with a clear indication that the weapons being sent are primarily defensive in nature: “Your defensive weapons primarily.” Throughout, the message conveys that the defense of Ukraine requires continued and increased military support in the form of weapons, due to the heavy blows Ukraine is sustaining.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you planning to send more weapons to Ukraine? We're gonna send some more weapons. We have to. They they have to be able to defend themselves. They're getting hit very hard now. They're getting hit very hard. We're gonna have to send more weapons. Your defensive weapons primarily, but they're getting hit very, very hard.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@OwenShroyer1776 - Owen Shroyer

Political Bizarro World

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker describes a perceived flip in the political dynamic around the Epstein files, calling the current moment “political bizarro world.” They observe that on the right, voices now say to move on from the Epstein files, treating it as no big deal, while on the left, voices push for releasing and declassifying the files, with Democrats even attempting to force a floor vote. The speaker notes that during the Trump era, Epstein was a campaign issue, with Trump and several administration members stressing the importance and urgency of releasing the files, and even FBI director Cash Patel reportedly saying it should be the number-one priority. The speaker claims that a majority of Trump voters would have supported releasing the Epstein files on day one, and asserts that this topic was once central to Trump’s political base. In contrast, they point out that in the present moment, the right is urging no action and the left is demanding action, highlighting a stark reversal in public and media positions. Media coverage is described as contradictory to the past: the speaker says CNN and MSNBC are now treating the Epstein files as their biggest story, with Democrats actively calling for declassification and release. They cite Democrats writing songs and posting on social media to advocate for release, suggesting an active and vocal push from the left. A year earlier, the speaker contends, the situation was reversed: right-wing figures demanded the Epstein files, Republican Trump-era officials supported it, and Democrats were largely silent or dismissed the issue as conspiracy theory for involving Bill Clinton. Now, the speaker argues, Democrats are pursuing release while Trump-related figures and right-wing elements retort with resistance or minimal engagement. The speaker uses the juxtaposition to argue that politicians, down to voters, appear highly controlled and capable of swiftly switching sides on the Epstein issue, illustrating broader impressions of partisan manipulation. They suggest broader themes such as “no new wars,” “no new foreign entanglements,” and “no new strikes” as possible contexts for the shifting narratives, alongside reactions to Iran-related actions and Middle East involvement, though they acknowledge these as speculative links. Ultimately, the speaker emphasizes how drastic the shift around the Epstein files feels, labeling it the most political bizarro-world moment and, in their view, a return to “clown world”—now in an inverted, bizarro form.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. We are now officially in political bizarro world. Now I was gonna post on x about this, but I started to type it out and I realized this is so weird. I can't even really put it into text. So I'll just go ahead and shoot a short video. We are in political bizarro world. What am I talking about? You now have the right wing saying to move on from the Epstein files. Nothing to see here. Forget about it. No big deal. And you have the left wing now talking about the Epstein files, demanding their release, even Democrats trying to take it to a vote on the floor of the house to get them declassified. What? On the campaign, Trump talked about the Epstein files multiple times and releasing them. Multiple members of his administration talked about the importance, the utmost importance of the Epstein files and releasing them. Some, including FBI director Cash Patel, said it should be the number one priority, demanded it be done day one. I would say the majority of Trump voters would have said, yes. Epstein files day one. It was literally a campaign issue. And now a lot of these voices in the Trump world on the right wing are saying move on. Nothing to see here. Meanwhile, I tune in to CNN last night. I tune in to MSNBC last night. And what is their biggest story? The Epstein files. And they're demanding the Epstein files. I've got democrats writing songs and posting them on their social media demanding the Epstein files be released. What? What is going on? A year ago, it was the exact opposite. A year ago, it was right wingers demanding the Epstein files, writing songs, all this stuff, Republicans, Trump now administration members, and the Democrats were silent. Or they would call it a conspiracy theorist because he talked about Bill Clinton on the list. Now you have the Democrats in a full forced effort to try to get the files released, and it's the Trump administration and the right wing stopping it and saying nothing to see here. What in the world? And you know what it really shows? It shows how controlled both sides are from from the politicians all the way down to the constituents, to the voters, to the people. It shows how everything is controlled, that just like that, all of a sudden, people just change sides. So we went from the right being give us the Epstein files to now the left being give us the Epstein files. And, you know, there's a couple different issues you could say maybe tie into this bizarro world like no new wars, no new foreign entanglements, no new strikes, and then the Iran strikes and and more involvement in the Middle East and Trump people kind of trying to make excuses or switch for that. But that's just I don't know. You could even say maybe that's politics is normal. There has been nothing more political bizarro world than the switch on the Epstein files. It is shocking. Now let me just say this. If this had happened a year ago when Biden was in the White House and the Democrats had the Senate and the Democrats had the House and Biden said, we're not gonna do the Epstein files, and Biden's FBI said, we're not gonna do the Epstein files, and Biden's attorney general said, we're not gonna do the Epstein files, and then Republicans tried to get a vote to declassify the Epstein files and the Democrats shut it down, what would you be saying as a Trump voter? What would you be saying as a right winger? What would you be saying as a conservative? Don't tell me you wouldn't be outraged. Don't tell me you wouldn't say Joe Biden was covering it up. Don't tell me you wouldn't be screaming how the Democrats are covering up sex trafficking. Of course, you would. But, oh, because it's Trump and the Republicans, now you're okay with it. And if you're already making excuses as to why you're okay with it now or, oh, it's Trump and not Biden, then yet again, it shows how we're in political bizarro world and it shows how easily controlled both sides of the political aisle are. Clown world. I thought we left clown world. We're right back in it, Except now it's bizarro form.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@NoLieWithBTC - No Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen

There it is. Republicans just BLOCKED the release of the Epstein Files.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The amendment was put to a vote. Those in favor signified by saying aye; those opposed say no. The chair ruled the noes have it, and the amendment is not agreed to. A roll call was requested. The roll call results were: - Missus Fishbach: No - Mister Norman: Yes - Mister Roy: No - Missus Houchin: No - Mister Langworthy: No - Mister Scott: No - Mister Griffith: No - Mister Jack: No - Mister McGovern: Aye - Miss Gantlin: Aye - Mister Nugoose: Aye - Miss Ledger Fernandez: Aye - Madam chair: No The clerk reported the total as 5 yeas and 7 nays. The amendment remains not agreed to. The chair indicated that what’s appropriate will be released when it is time for the president to release it.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hearing none, the questions on the amendment. All those in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Those opposed say no. No. No. In the opinion chair, the noes have it. The amendment is not agreed. Speaker 1: I'm kinda shocked by that. I will ask for a roll call. Speaker 0: The clerk will call the roll. Speaker 1: Missus Fishbach? No. Missus Fishbach, no. Mister Norman? Yeah. Mister Norman, I. Mister Roy, missus Houchin? No. Missus Houchin? No. Mister Langworthy? No. Mister Langworthy? No. Mister Scott? Mister Scott, no. Mister Griffith? Mister Griffith? No. Mister Jack? No. Mister Jack, no. Mister McGovern? Aye. Mister McGovern, aye. Miss Gantlin? Yes. Miss Gantlin, aye. Mister Nugoose? Yes. Mister Nugoose, aye. Miss Ledger Fernandez? Aye. Miss Ledger Fernandez, aye. Madam chair? No. Madam chair, no. The clerk will report the total. 5 yeas, seven a's. Speaker 0: The noes have it. The amendment is not agreed to. And I think most of us believe what's appropriate will be released when it is time for the president to release it. Speaker 1: Well, madam Speaker 0: Thank you.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@deSunShineBand - CS

Zou ‘t waar zijn?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Due to this villa worth over $20,000,000, no one believes Greta Thunberg anymore. She’s always publicly claimed that living modestly was her life’s goal, insisting that she rejected luxury in order to remain true to her message. But recently, journalists uncovered that this stunning villa you’re looking at now is actually registered in her name. Rumors quickly circulated that a wealthy Hollywood activist had gifted the property to Greta, but many remained doubtful. Critics argue that the funds may have come from the humanitarian campaigns she personally organized in countries around the raising serious questions about transparency. The revelation has sparked intense debate with many feeling betrayed and questioning whether Greta’s image of simplicity and sacrifice was ever real. Whether the villa was truly a gift or not, the controversy has left lasting stain on her reputation, making people wonder if her carefully built persona was just an illusion.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Because of this villa worth over $20,000,000, no one believes Greta Thunberg anymore. She's always publicly claimed that living modestly was her life's goal, insisting that she rejected luxury in order to remain true to her message. But recently, journalists uncovered that this stunning villa you're looking at now is actually registered in her name. Rumors quickly circulated that a wealthy Hollywood activist had gifted the property to Greta, but many remained doubtful. Critics argue that the funds may have come from the humanitarian campaigns she personally organized in countries around the raising serious questions about transparency. The revelation has sparked intense debate with many feeling betrayed and questioning whether Greta's image of simplicity and sacrifice was ever real. Whether the villa was truly a gift or not, the controversy has left lasting stain on her reputation, making people wonder if her carefully built persona was just an illusion.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

From Satire To Reality - False Green Agenda & Climate Change https://www.bitchute.com/video/sVvOHRofonXi Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

From Satire To Reality - False Green Agenda & Climate Change Do it for grandma and the children... bitchute.com

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/rndgGtZ31Y Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

MAHA Action just deleted this new video of RFK Jr. talking about how they're developing a new universal vaccine at NIH for corona and flu which is "gonna be a much safer and more effective vaccine". Hazard a guess on why they'd do that? https://t.co/nClS18k2hS

Video Transcript AI Summary
The NIH is developing a universal vaccine that addresses the entire phylum of viruses. This vaccine mimics natural immunity and is effective against any kind of mutation. It doesn't drive the virus to mutate. The researchers believe it could be effective not only against coronaviruses but also against influenza. The vaccine is described as much safer and much more effective. The exchange then notes that Mark, did you take your question again? and Mark is prompted to ask his question.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Right now, we're developing a universal vaccine at NIH, which is a vaccine that addresses the entire phylum of viruses. And so it's a it's a vaccine that mimics natural immunity, and it and it it is effective against any kind of mutation. So it doesn't drive the virus to mutate, and it could be effective. We believe it's gonna be effective about against not only coronaviruses, but also flu. And it's gonna be a much more much safer and much more effective vaccine. Mark, did you take your question again? Now we're developing a universal vaccine at NIH, which is a vaccine that addresses the entire phylum of viruses. And so it's a it's a vaccine that mimics natural immunity, and it and it it is effective against any kind of mutation. So it doesn't drive the virus to mutate, and it could be effective. We believe it's gonna be effective about against not only coronaviruses, but also flu. And it's gonna be a much more much safer and much more effective vaccine. Mark, did you have your question?

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/LwMuuuhYWA Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Insight into why Israel has a leash on Trump (IMO) "In the early '90s...Trump... declares bankruptcy... he's bailed out by Wilbur Ross... representing the Rothschild banking interests... the Rothschild family has a very long... history with Zionism and... the State of Israel." This clip of Whitney Webb (@_whitneywebb), author of One Nation Under Blackmail and contributing editor of unlimitedhangout(.)com, is taken from an interview with Kim Iversen (@KimIversenShow) posted to Rumble on August 6, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "And then in the early '90s, Trump's Atlantic City holdings, and other things, dragged down his business empire. And he declares bankruptcy, and in order to be bailed out, he's bailed out by, Wilbur Ross, who he later rewards for that when he's president, the first time making him Commerce Secretary. "But at the time, Wilbur Ross was representing the Rothschild banking interests. And the Rothschild banking interest, specifically this Wall Street M and A arm that they opened up in the '80s was responsible for bringing Robert Maxwell to New York. "So basically, you know, Trump as a business icon would not have existed beyond the early 1990s if it wasn't for the, Rothschild banking interests, who have a lot of affiliations to people and sort of, the Epstein network, and specifically Epstein's financial crimes, which include a lot of currency speculation in this, what the New York Times once called a currency speculation cabal, including people like Jimmy Goldsmith, also backed by the Rothschilds, and even George Soros, whose first, his Quantum Fund in, like, the late '60s was bankrolled by the French Rothschild interests. "And for anyone that's familiar, the Rothschild family has a very, long and storied history with Zionism and the establishment of the State of Israel and and being a major patron of that. So, you know, they've definitely had a lot of influence, I would think, over, Trump now, since he owes them a lot."

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the early 1990s, Trump’s Atlantic City Holdings and other ventures dragged down his business empire, leading to bankruptcy. To secure a bailout, he was aided by Wilbur Ross, who later became commerce secretary under Trump. At that time, Wilbur Ross represented the Rothschild banking interests. The Rothschilds, specifically the Wall Street mergers and acquisitions arm they opened in the 1980s, were responsible for bringing Robert Maxwell to New York. The narrative asserts that Trump, as a business icon, would not have existed beyond the early 1990s if it weren’t for the Rothschild banking interests, which are described as having extensive affiliations with people in the Epstein network. The transcript links Epstein’s financial crimes to currency speculation described by the New York Times as a “currency speculation cabal,” and names individuals such as Jamie Goldsmith as being backed by the Rothschilds, as well as George Soros, whose Quantum Fund in the late 1960s was bankrolled by French Rothschild interests. The account emphasizes a long and storied history between the Rothschild family and Zionism, including the establishment of the state of Israel, and portrays the Rothschilds as major patrons of that cause. It concludes by suggesting that the Rothschilds have had substantial influence over Trump, asserting that Trump owes them a great deal. Overall, the narrative draws a chain of connections: the Rothschild banking interests’ influence helped shape Trump’s rise and persistence as a prominent business figure, with Wilbur Ross’s bailout role in the 1990s serving as a pivotal link, and various high-profile financial networks—Epstein-related cohorts, currency speculation participants, and financiers like Jamie Goldsmith and George Soros—being connected to Rothschilds. It also foregrounds the Rothschilds’ historical ties to Zionism and the establishment of Israel as part of their influence, asserting that these relationships have translated into ongoing sway over Trump.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Then in the early nineties, Trump's Atlantic City Holdings, and other things dragged down his business empire, and he declares bankruptcy. And in order to be bailed out, he's bailed out by, Wilbur Ross, who he later rewards for that when he's president. The first time making him commerce secretary. But at the time, Wilbur Ross was representing the Rothschild banking interests. And the Rothschild banking interests, specifically this Wall Street m and a arm that they opened up in the eighties, was responsible for bringing Robert Maxwell to New York. So, basically, you know, Trump as a business icon would not have existed beyond the night early nineteen nineties if it wasn't for, the Rothschild banking interests, who have a lot of affiliations to people in sort of, the Epstein network and specifically Epstein's financial crimes, which include a lot of currency speculation in this, what the New York Times once called a currency speculation cabal, including people like Jamie Goldsmith also backed by the Rothschilds and even George Soros whose first, his quantum fund in, like, the late sixties was bankrolled by the French Rothschild interest. And if for anyone that's familiar, the Rothschild family has a very, long and storied history with Zionism and the establishment of the state of Israel and and being a major patron of that. So, you know, they've definitely had a lot of influence, I would think, over, Trump now since he owes them a lot. And also

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/VeHAF1Ik18 Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@DollarVigilante - The Dollar Vigilante

One of the most obvious CIA assets in the limelight. #TuckerCarlson https://t.co/gp5HTZhVbv

Video Transcript AI Summary
Several speakers discuss the idea that Tucker Carlson is a CIA asset. Speaker 0 argues that Carlson “is clearly a CIA asset,” noting that you don’t rise to a global audience and make money from edgy content unless you’re “in the big club.” They point to a supposed inconsistency: Carlson recently said he was shocked to discover his dad was in the CIA upon his death in March 2025, yet, “here he is in June 2024, like a year earlier, admitting his father was CIA.” They state Carlson “said he only found out in 2025 after his father died, but here he is in 2024 saying he knew his dad was CIA.” Speaker 1 adds personal details, saying, “when I applied to CIA, and I’ve taken a lot of crap including from Putin, like, you’re from a CIA family.” They acknowledge that “my father worked in conjunction with CIA,” and that they tried to join the CIA but were not being false about it, and that “he’s attacking my dad because the CIA is dad to the CIA or whatever.” They claim, “Then my father dies and I learn actually, yeah, you know, was involved in that world. I was completely shocked by it.” Speaker 0 amplifies the claim by referencing Tucker Carlson with “an ex CIA agent” who says to Carlson, “you’re a lot more on the inside than me.” They find it interesting that Carlson “is like a ex CIA agent. He’s saying Tucker Carlson’s more on the inside than he is.” They encourage listeners to pay attention to Tucker’s response, saying, “listen to Tucker’s response and I want you to pay attention this because it’s in these moments that you actually can see what’s actually going on.” Speaker 2 briefly interjects with uncertainty about deals that took place, and Speaker 1 comments that they have “not made $1 in The Middle East, not 1.” Speaker 2 says, “Well, I mean, if you’re allowed me more on the inside than I am.” Speaker 1 denies, saying, “No. No. No. I’m just a I’m just a visitor and a traveler and a watcher, but I don’t, you know.” The conversation ends with Speaker 0 asking, “Did you kinda see what happened there?”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I think people are actually starting to catch on to what I've been saying for a long time. I've been saying this for years. Tucker Carlson is clearly a CIA asset. You don't get into Fox and, then get out and get, like, this audience of, like, the entire world and say things that are, you know, a little bit edgy and make tons of money unless you're in the big club. And it's actually starting to come out now. Like, he recently said that, he was shocked to discover his dad was in the CIA upon his death in March 2025. But here he is in June 2024, like a year earlier, admitting his father was CIA. So he said he only found out in 2025 after his father died, but here he is in 2024 saying he knew his dad was CIA. Speaker 1: And so when I applied to CIA, and I've taken a lot of crap including from Putin, like, you're from a CIA family. Well, yeah, obviously, my father worked in conjunction with CIA. I mean, that's what that is. And I tried to join the CIA, but I'm not being false about it. And he's attacking my dad because the CIA is dad to the CIA or whatever. And I'm like, well, that's no. Untrue. Then my father dies and I learn actually, yeah, you know, was involved in that world. I was completely shocked by it. Speaker 0: Like here's Tucker Carlson with an ex CIA agent and the CIA agent says to him, you're a lot more on the inside than me. That's interesting. Like, he's like a ex CIA agent. He's saying Tucker Carlson's more on the inside than he is. Listen to Tucker's response and I want you to pay attention this because it's in these moments that you actually can see what's actually going on. Speaker 2: Like, just get done also with the deals that just happened over there, or was this earlier? I don't you would probably know. Speaker 1: No. I don't know. You don't? I've not made $1 in The Middle East, not 1. Speaker 2: Well, I mean I mean, if you're allowed me more on the inside than I am. Speaker 1: And No. No. No. I'm just a I'm just a visitor and a traveler and a watcher, but I don't, you know. Speaker 0: Did you kinda see what happened there?

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/KmYhsJKABW Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@flatsmackin - DemonstrableReality

Think about the fact that the masses believed this and still do. 😳 https://t.co/Zs9VEa6u4G

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/9zUcgRbvNg Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@realstewpeters - Stew Peters

Trump just authorized FOUR NEW COVID VACCINES. https://t.co/zfLl0JZsUg

Video Transcript AI Summary
The question asked whether the president believes the COVID vaccine should be available to and covered by insurance for all Americans regardless of age and preexisting conditions. The response notes that the FDA recently revoked the emergency youth authorizations for three COVID vaccinations while simultaneously approving four new COVID-19 vaccines with 2025 and 2026 formulas. The revocation is described as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic and the public health emergency being over. To correct the record, it is stated that the FDA’s decision does not affect the availability of COVID vaccines for Americans who want them. The administration says, “We believe in individual choice,” a promise the president and the secretary have made and delivered on.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: From miscommunications or differences on vaccine policy. So I wonder if you could just say whether or not the president believes that the COVID vaccine should be available to and covered by insurance for all Americans regardless of age and preexisting conditions. What I will tell you is that the FDA recently revoked the emergency youth authorizations for three COVID vaccinations while simultaneously green lighting four new COVID nineteen vaccines with twenty twenty five and twenty twenty six formulas. The the reason for the revocation of that emergency youth authorization is because obviously the COVID pandemic and the public health emergency is over. But just to correct the record because there's been a lot of misinformation on this, the FDA's decision does not affect the availability of COVID vaccines for Americans who want them. We believe in individual choice. That's a promise both the president and the secretary have made, and it's a promise they have now delivered on.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/gDeAS03UKD Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@SemperVeritasX - John-Paul Berg

Pierre Poilievre is not a nationalist. He isn't even a conservative. The guy is a controlled opposition, uniparty globalist. They're all in on it together. The entirety of our politics is an elaborate performative charade to provide the illusion of participatory governance to the peasantry. This has never been more evident. Every day I wonder when you people will notice.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/7Z7bVBlQjG Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@PatteeuwJens - Jens Patteeuw

Just a few days ago, Bill Gates met with Trump at the White House. This is the second time they have met; at the beginning of the year, they had a dinner. Gates said then that he was "impressed" with Trump’s interest in global health at that time. For all those who somehow hoped that Gates would be arrested or that Trump would do it, just forget it. It's not gonna happen, at all. This recent meeting happened around the same time Karoline Leavitt, the White House Press Secretary, announced there would be four new covid vaccines. Also, earlier this week, Trump again reiterated that Operation Warp Speed (the COVID-19 vaccines) was a huge success. There's a lot more than meets the eye. We can't forget that Bill Gates publicly endorsed JD Vance's book "Hillbilly Elegy" on his own blog in 2017. So he was already promoting JD Vance before he became "famous". JD Vance is sponsored by globalist and Bilderberg member Peter Thiel. In light of the recent statements of JD Vance, saying that he "is ready to take over", if "God forbid something terrible would happen", this is all very peculiar. #Trump #BillGates #news

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/Ged4Fu9cXF Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@ShannonJoyRadio - Shannon Joy

Don't fall for this scam @liz_churchill10 Trump is NOT going to war with PHARMA, he's HELPING them by providing a reason to eliminate ALL the 'old vaccines' because of thimerosal. Trump, RFK & Bhattacharya have been heavily promoting 'operation warp speed tactics' to develop new, universal mRNA and sa-mRNA shots for PHARMA to replace traditional vaccines. This is NOT Trump waking up, or doing the right thing, or launching a 'war against vaccines' ... this is a MARKETING CAMPAIGN for the new mRNA technology. And they WILL MANDATE these. DO NOT FALL FOR THIS!

@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill

Oh. My. God. President Trump calls out the VACCINE TERRORISTS…https://t.co/dJLDTn9xbX

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 shows a metal container described as a “thimerosal bomb,” noting they keep it because they are a little afraid of it, and it is a very fine powder. Speaker 2 states that thimerosal is labeled very toxic and has cumulative effects, capable of causing damage to the kidneys, respiratory system, skin, and nervous system. It specifically warns of reproductive and developmental toxicity, meaning it can cause things like autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders. They emphasize that this is immensely toxic stuff. Speaker 0 notes that thimerosal is present in a vaccine. Speaker 2 explains that thimerosal is used in a whole range of products, with vaccines being a major example because it is directly injected. They reference the tetanus vaccine, noting a vial that expires and contains thimerosal as a preservative. They claim that thimerosal has been a big exposure issue in the United States, especially with the influenza vaccine, which is now recommended for all pregnant women, all infants, and all children on a yearly basis. Speaker 1 adds a point about how thimerosal is added: it is not something added at the end after production but is incorporated because the factory is not clean and not sterile. They argue that either there must be an expensive sterile factory that does not need thimerosal or one that produces thimerosal, and that thimerosal would need to be used throughout production. They assert that the use of thimerosal needs to be stopped. Speaker 2 identifies the influenza vaccine from Adventist Pasture, “their flu zone,” and states that it contains twenty-five micrograms of mercury per dose. Speaker 1 discusses personal experience, noting that many people did not know about thimerosal. They reveal they have given 2,000 RhoGAM shots and have been in vaccines for thirty-five years, and they did not know that RhoGAM contained thimerosal. They suggest that many doctors were unaware that the term “thimerosal” referred to mercury.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Show them the thimerosal bomb, which we keep in a metal container because we're a Speaker 1: little afraid of it, and it's a very fine powder. Speaker 2: This is this is thimerosal, which is labeled very toxic. Has cumulative effects, can cause damage to the kidneys, to the respiratory system, skin, to the nervous system. Specifically warns on here that it can cause reproductive and developmental toxicity, meaning that it can cause things like autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders. This is immensely toxic stuff. Speaker 0: And it's a vaccine. Speaker 2: And this is what's in the vaccine. It's important to to realize we're talking about a whole range of products. Vaccines are a big one because, of course, you're directly injecting it. For example, this is tetanus vaccine. This one expires. It's a lot dated now in 02/2007. Here's the thimerosal. 1 to October is a preservative. Perhaps the the biggest one in The US, at least, that's ex for exposure to mercury is the influenza Influenza vaccine is now recommended for all pregnant women, all infants, all children on a yearly basis. You're supposed to Speaker 1: You have last year's influenza? Understand that Thimerosal is not added at the end. It's not like, well, that factory next year can make Thimerosal free. Thimerosal, you either have to have a thimerosal free factory or you have to not have one. They add thimerosal at each step because the factory is not clean and not sterile. So you either have to have an expensive sterile factory where you don't need thimerosal or you have to have one that produces thimerosal. It's gonna need thimerosal or something the whole time. It needs to be stopped. Speaker 2: This is, the influenza vaccine from Adventist Pasture, their flu zone. Thimerosal, twenty five micrograms of mercury per dose. Speaker 1: I'd like to point out that a lot of people didn't know, and and I'm one of Speaker 2: them. Speaker 1: I've given 2,000 RhoGAM shots. I've been in vaccines for thirty five years. I didn't know that RhoGAM had Thimerosal in it. So I think a lot of the doctors were unaware. They weren't aware that even the word Thimerosal meant mercury.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/ilrV1mCNCT Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@JuanGutiCA714 - Juan Hodl

Alex Krainer explains who is at the top of the “globalist network”: These are networks of power that operate outside of the rule of law… like a mafia. In everything I’ve read it always emerges that this name Rothschild comes up as the people who seemingly wield the most power. https://t.co/emySyfd1uK

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 explains that the network is a meta tribe of oligarchs centered in a history starting with Cecil Rhodes, who envisioned a world controlled by the elite. He says Rhodes handed the vision to Milner and the Milner group, describing Milner as “my blood brother” and noting that Milner was committed. The network expanded from a Crown/London core to encompass Wall Street, the American Deep State, and major banking families named in Tragedy and Hope. He defines the network as a broad, elite circle and notes there isn’t a single top person. Speaker 1 references Tragedy and Hope and Carrol Quigley, along with Guido Preparata’s Conjuring Hitler, as key to understanding what happened in 1938. He asserts that Quigley gave readers the keys in a long but detailed work, suggesting that the powers of financial capitalism sought “to create a world system of financial control in private hands, to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole,” with the growth of financial capitalism enabling a decentralization of world economic control and benefiting financiers while harming other economic groups. He connects this to Russia in the 1990s, arguing that oligarchs like Mikhail Khodorkovsky and others were not merely reform-minded tycoons but “handpicked trustees” serving foreign financial interests, with figures such as George Soros and Edmund Safra involved. Speaker 1 adds that, despite a claim there’s no top, there must be one at the top since these are networks of power operating outside the rule of law, like a mafia. He contends Rothschilds are often the top-wielding group, with others subordinated to them, and that civil wars can erupt among these bankers when crises arise. He suggests American bankers may be challenging British bankers for ascendancy, implying a current (unspecified) civil conflict within the network. He acknowledges the difficulty of knowing what happens behind closed walls and notes the top dog concept exists: “there must be a top of the hierarchy because, otherwise the whole system… there'd be like you have a pack of dogs. There’s always going to be a top dog.” Speaker 0 agrees with the “lead dog” principle and adds that there are multiple major families or clans, each with its own leadership. He emphasizes a “family element” to the network, referencing “pancake” or mafioso-style families, and remarks that this discussion provides a concise, one-stop shop for understanding the topic. Speaker 0 then signals a transition to the next point with enthusiasm.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But the network, Alex, broadly who are the network? Because it's clear from tragedy and hope, I'd say is the most accurate around. It kind of starts mainly in the modern times with, Cecil Rhodes who had the vision, right, to have a world completely controlled by the elite. No conspiracy theory, it's all documented. And then he handed over to Milner and the Milner group, and he said Milner basically, he said, is my blood brother. He fully entrusted him with the vision. Mildner was committed. And then you have this whole crown kind of city of London, UK, powerful network that eventually became a network that encompassed Wall Street and the American Deep State, if you want to call it, and of course all the great banking families, many of them named in tragedy and hope. Is getting towards like, what the network is? It's a meta tribe of oligarchs. And that's why it's kinda hard to to get right to the guy at the top. There isn't really a guy at the top. It's all of what I said and more. Yeah? Speaker 1: Yes. Look. I I read Tragedy and Hope, and I read it very carefully. And in fact, this whole story about appeasement, I reconstructed it from Carole Quigley. And with some subsequent research by the guy who wrote conjuring Hitler. That's that's a masterpiece. His name is Guido Antonio Preparata. Okay? And that book is not as not as long, but it's it's it's, like, dense. It's, like, completely fluffy, and it, like, blows your mind. So from those two books, I reconstructed the what actually happened in 1938 in in Munich. Anyway so, basically, Carroll Quigley, I believe that he gave us the keys. He just couldn't come out exactly and give it away because it would be too you know, the it would have been spotted straight away. So he put it in a into a book that's, like, thirteen, four 1,400 pages long, and then you have to read it very carefully, but it's a lot is there. A lot is there. And I will I will read to you. I have this in front of me the maybe the key quote, which which tells you what we're up against. And the one so this is this is the key quote from Carroll Quigley. I think many people are already familiar by this, but he says that the powers of financial capitalism had a far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands, to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. The growth of financial capitalism made possible a decentralization of world economic control and use of this power for the direct benefit of financiers and direct injury of all other economic groups. And so this quote, when you take when you keep that in mind and you look at what happened in Russia in the nineteen nineties, it's it's exactly what happened. And then you you also find out that these people like Mikhail Khodorkovsky and these other oligarchs, that they were not just, you know, Russian tycoons who emerged because they were very capable and, you know, aggressive young reformers as they were presented in the media in the West. They were handpicked trustees who were serving the needs of the foreign financial interests. And so Mikhail Khodorkovsky was a trustee for Jacob Rothschild's interests in Russia. George Soros was there, involved very prominently. Edmund Safra, and and a numb a a number of a number of high profile western bankers. But, you know, when you say that there's nobody at the top, I think that there's somebody at the top necessarily because, you know, this is you know, these are these are networks of power, and you're right to call it a network. These are networks of power that operate outside of the rule of law. So they're not bound by lawful institutions. This is like law of the jungle. It it functions like a like a mafia like a mafia business, like a mafia organization, which means that somebody necessarily has to be at the top to enforce the order. You know, you can't have democracy at at that level. So in in everything that I've read so far, it always emerges that this name Rothschild comes up as as the people who seemingly wield the most power, and then everybody else is kind of in a in a subordinate position to them. And I think that when things are going well, they they get along, and they work as a club. And, you know, I'm in charge, but you have your own suzerainty there, and you have your own you know, you dominate your own. But when things get difficult, when the system comes to a crisis, then you see that you might have civil wars there between these bankers. And I think that we're living in a period when these civil wars are erupting again. And it seems to me that the American bankers feel that they no longer have to be subordinated to the to the British bankers. And I think that part of what we see today might be that civil war. Of course, we don't know anything about this. We can just look at where smoke you know, which orifice produces the smoke, and then we can just try to kind of wonder what what actually happened behind the the closed walls. But Yeah. You know, there must be there must be top of the hierarchy because, otherwise the whole system you know, it'd be like you have a pack of dogs. There's always going to be a top dog. And if there isn't a top dog, the other dogs are going to fight to the death until one emerges as the top dog, and then they'll be at peace. Speaker 0: Yeah. And that's the lead dog kind of principle. Absolutely. You know, a slight variant on that to allow for not one kingpin to your mafia analogy, there's a bunch of major families and each of them sure has the dawn. But maybe there isn't a single one, but there's certainly a cluster of key lead dogs. And the beautiful elegance of that is because we're talking about families, right? Pancake families, Baffia families. There's a family element to it. And you know, I was going to my next bullet point. This is fantastic, Alex. This is a one stop shop for Speaker 1: everyone Speaker 0: to know.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/sHrMmZdmZ4 Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@MareQay - Mare Qay

Dang, wonder how many at the time were paying attention https://t.co/OgKK62YlUC

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses that they wanted to meet face to face to get admission of what “they” were doing. Speaker 1 identifies “they” as someone in the office of the Trilateral Commission. Speaker 0 asks what the Trilateral Commission is. Speaker 1 explains that it is “an organization founded in 1973 by David Rockefeller to bring together business and political leaders from The United States, Europe, Japan so they could work together for better economic and political cooperation between their nations.” Speaker 0 counters that this is what they’d like people to believe, but claims that “what they’re really up to is a scheme to plant their own loyal members in positions of power in this country to work to erase national boundaries and create an international community, and in time, bring about a one world government with David Rockefeller calling the shots.” Speaker 0 asks if they’re pressing charges; agrees that a globe was broken and UNICEF artwork damaged, and adds that “they’re in on it too.” Speaker 0 asks for a Mister Klein, who replies that he has documented evidence and “the magazines here” are Conspiracy Review and Suppressed Truth Roundup, asserting that “the whole master plan is exposed.” Speaker 0 notes that Klein remains unconvinced and asks if he’d like to hear a few names of people who have been on the Trilateral Commission. Klein is not particularly enthusiastic. Speaker 1 lists names: James O’Carter (likely a misreference or fictionalized name), Henry Kissinger, Walter Mondale, and Mister Klein, then John Anderson, George Bush. Speaker 0 recalls the convention where it seemed Ford would be the VP candidate, but says David Rockefeller “just picked up a phone, put in a call,” saying, “Hey, Ronnie. Forget Jerry. It’s George. Bye.” He concludes that “no matter who won in November, they had their man in the White House.” Speaker 0 asks if they are through. The response is implied as yes.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I just wanted to meet them face to face. I I wanted them to admit what they were doing. Who is they? Speaker 1: He was in the office of the trilateral commission. Speaker 0: Trilateral commission? Speaker 1: Yeah. The trilateral commission. Speaker 0: Alright. What is the trilateral commission? Speaker 1: It's an organization founded in 1973 by David Rockefeller to bring together business and political leaders from The United States, Europe, Japan so they could work together for better economic and political cooperation between their nations. Speaker 0: Well, that that's what they'd like us to believe. But you see, Speaker 2: what they're really up to is a scheme to plant Speaker 0: their own loyal members in positions of power in this country to work to erase national boundaries and create an international community, and in time, bring about a one world government with David Rockefeller calling the shots. I take it they're pressing charges? Yeah. Well, I I he broke a globe and and some UNICEF artwork. Well, they're they're in on it too. Okay, mister Klein. I'm just telling you our whole way of life as we know it is in jeopardy. I appreciate that information. But I I I have I have the documented evidence. It's all in there. Show him. Well, he's got got these magazines here. Conspiracy review, Suppressed truth roundup? The whole master plan is exposed. Yeah. Well, You're still not convinced. Would would you like to hear the names of just a few of the people who have been on the trilateral commission? Not particularly. James O'Carter. Heard of him? Look, mister Klein Henry Kissinger. You heard of him? Walter Mondale. Who? Mister Klein, this is John Anderson, George Bush. Now you remember at the at the convention, everybody thought it was gonna be Ford for Veep. You know what happened? David Rockefeller just picked up a phone, put in a call. Hey, Ronnie. Forget Jerry. It's George. Bye. So no matter who won in November, they had their man in the White House. Are you through? Yeah.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/gVAqsDDlpV Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@SapperWarrior - 100% MAGA, BUT FUCK TRUMP 🇷🇺 🇺🇸 🇷🇺 🇺🇸

Trump, who has turned into the biggest neocon in presidential history, just did more to validate and help the globalist swamp warmongers than any Democrat or RINO could’ve ever hoped for. After campaigning for and voting for Trump in every election, I feel furiously betrayed 😡 https://t.co/2puCajgELc

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/bgtuPShdt4 Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@ITMTrading - ITM Trading

Charlie Kirk Assassination Fuels Elite’s Reset Plan for Great Depression 2.0 - Ed Dowd Watch now: https://youtu.be/kSCyKHsTBAo #finance #money #dollar #usd #gold @DanielaCambone @DowdEdward https://t.co/e1Ok9JWuXs

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/URjsmXXTUQ Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@AllenDMartin - Allen Martin

Pfizer murdered my 18 yo daughter! mRNA batch fn2908. Nov 9,2022. @Potus just awarded @pfizer a 70 BILLION CONTRACT ... to murder more people! The man standing beside him today, shook my hand and promised to make them pay, less than a year ago. Here I am, STILL TRYING TO PAY OFF HER FUNERAL!!!! I don't need 70 billion, I only need about $4,000 so she can have a fucking headstone!!!! THEY MURDERED HER AND NOW THEY'RE "LEADERS" AND "GREAT PEOPLE"!?! FUCK YOU! THE GASLIGHTING IS TOO MUCH! I CAN'T FUCKING TAKE IT ANYMORE!

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/5yCbPoG5Pw Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

Before the election: ‘We’ll release the Epstein files.’ After the election: They protect the pedophiles. Before the election: ‘We’ll end the wars.’ After the election: They fund genocide. Before the election: ‘We’ll go after COVID crimes.’ After the election: They hand $70 billion to Pfizer. I can’t stomach it anymore. This administration is a disgrace.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/WPEE8N9FNB Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@Alec_Zeck - D. Alec Zeck

I think I’m at the point where I just appreciate the comedic absurdity of it all. Some people genuinely believe Trump is a freedom fighter, secretly leading a military operation to take down the deep state. Others believe he’s the literal embodiment of evil and the sole cause of all modern problems. And then there are those who still believe that voting matters and that legitimate, lasting solutions are going to come from politics. At this point, it’s like watching different cults argue over which illusion is more real and it’s hilarious (and sometimes disturbing).

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/GOf5RzPXM5 Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@davidicke - David Icke

This is what I have said for years about the hard sell and soft sell of AI dystopia. People like Gates and Schwab have gone for the hard sell and for the sceptics Musk goes for the soft sell. The outcome in BOTH cases? Human-AI fusion - we think what AI tells us to think - and total human AI/digital enslavement. It's a pincer movement by two cheeks on the same backside - Gates and Schwab are cast as the pantomime villains while Musk plays the good guy who cares and only wants the best for you. Pure theatre. See my new book The Road Map in which I take the pantomime apart.

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🚨🇺🇸 ELON: xAI WAS BUILT TO LOVE HUMANITY “I created xAI to have an AI that is maximally truth-seeking, that aspirationally loves humanity and will seek the best interests of humanity going forward.” Elon described the mission as building AI that helps, but doesn’t replace https://t.co/wngEPrL9jF

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: I really want to have a maximally truth seeking AI. I can't emphasize that enough. That's incredibly important. And obviously build an AI that loves humanity. That's why I created xAI, which is to have an AI that is maximally truth seeking, aspirationally does love humanity, and will seek the best interests of humanity going forward.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Really want to have a maximally truth seeking AI. I can't emphasize that enough. That's incredibly important. And obviously build an AI that loves humanity. That's why I created xAI, which is to to have an AI that is maximally truth seeking, that aspirationally does love humanity, and will seek the best interests of humanity going forward.
trumpcel
Posted - June 7, 2025 at 3:57 PM
Saved - June 13, 2025 at 4:22 AM

@trumpcel - Trumpcel

@NickJFuentes Tucker Carlson is CIA https://t.co/YPveZG5HDD

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tucker Carlson has given conflicting responses about his connections to the CIA. He stated that he grew up surrounded by CIA agents because of his father's involvement, but claimed he didn't understand what the CIA was. Carlson said he applied to the CIA in 1990 wanting to work in operations, because his father's friends were operations officers. He mentioned that Kermit Roosevelt Jr., known for orchestrating the 1953 coup in Iran, lived near him. Despite his attempt to join, Carlson now claims to be a "sworn enemy of the CIA." Alan MacLeod of Minton Press notes that Carlson's father, Richard Carlson, was appointed by Ronald Reagan as director of the US Information Agency (USIA), overseeing Radio Liberty and Voice of America. These outlets were described by The New York Times as a CIA-built "worldwide propaganda network." Radio Free Europe was directly funded by the CIA until the 1970s. Carlson was asked if the CIA was behind the Nord Stream pipeline explosion, and he denied involvement. It was questioned whether it was a coincidence that the son of the former head of the US intelligence agency and director of Voice of Liberty for the CIA is now a major political pundit.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When Tucker Carlson is asked about any of his connections to the CIA, he always seems to give a very confusing mix of responses. In an interview with a former member of the CIA, Sean Ryan, he was asked about it. He recounted how everyone around him growing up was in the CIA because his father was. Despite this, he also says that he had no idea what the CIA really was. Speaker 1: You were trying to get into CIA? Yes. Vladimir Putin reminded me. I don't know how he knew that. Yeah. I applied to CIA when I was a senior in college. What did you want to do for the CIA? Operations. Yeah, it was completely different. Completely different organization. Well, who knows what it was, actually? I don't know. I mean, I was operating on the basis of a lot of my father's friends served as operations officers, some really wonderful guys, who I guess I probably shouldn't name, but who were always at our house and were just legit interesting people. So I applied to CIA and that whole application process then, this was 1990, and I should just say, for the record, that I, like, had no idea what the CIA was, actually. And I didn't believe any of the I think Kermit Roosevelt actually lived right down the street from us. Are you kidding? No. Oh, man. That's cool. Speaker 0: This isn't particularly relevant other than this being like a CIA super spy. Kermit Roosevelt Junior is a very famous intelligence officer who worked in the OSS and then the CIA. He was best known for his role in orchestrating the nineteen fifty three coup in Iran. Speaker 1: But I didn't know I mean, but that was just the world you live in in Northwest DC. Like, I didn't I never thought any of it was bad. And so when I applied to CIA, and I've taken a lot of crap, including from Putin, Oh, you're from a CIA family. Well, yeah, obviously my father worked in conjunction with CIA. Mean, that's what that is. And I tried to join the CIA, but I'm not being false about it. I am a sworn enemy of the CIA at this point. No doubt about that. I just wanted a life that was interesting. I wanted to see stuff. Speaker 0: This would all be a lot more believable conspicuous if he hadn't ended up becoming one of the most influential conservative news pundits in American history. Tucker Carlson himself says that he comes from a CIA family and that his father worked for the CIA. Alan MacLeod of Minton Press writes, Richard Carlson is an important journalist and high state official who was appointed by Ronald Reagan as director of the US Information Agency, USIA, which oversees Radio Liberty and Voice of America, which Dick was also the director. Together, these outlets are part of what The New York Times called a worldwide propaganda network built by the CIA. Their goal is to bombard enemy countries with regime change propaganda. Until the nineteen seventies, Radio Free Europe was directly funded by the CIA. Richard Carlson would have been running Voice of America and then the branch of the CIA that oversaw Voice of America at the height of the Cold War, basically the broadcasting wing of the CIA's propaganda machine. Speaker 2: With the backing of CIA, of course, the organization you wanted to join back in the day, as I understand. We should thank God they didn't let you in. Although, it is a serious organization. I understand. My former vis a vis, in the sense that I served in the first main directorate, Soviet Union's intelligence service. Who Speaker 1: blew up Nord Stream? Speaker 2: You for sure. Speaker 1: I was busy that day. Nate, do you have do you I did not blow up Nord Stream. Speaker 2: Thank you though. You personally may have an alibi, but the CIA has no such alibi. Is Speaker 0: it a coincidence the former head of the US intelligence agency and director of voice of liberty for the CIA's son is one of the most influential political pundits in America?
NickJFuentes
Posted - August 4, 2025 at 12:21 PM
Saved - August 5, 2025 at 10:22 PM

@NickJFuentes - Nicholas J. Fuentes

Tucker Carlson’s character assassination of Pat Buchanan in 1999 is nearly identical to his attack on me last week. Seriously, what is going on here? This is the definition of controlled opposition. https://t.co/uwvZdlq4P4

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss a controversial figure, possibly Nick Fuentes, noting his talent and articulation while also acknowledging problematic aspects of his views. It's claimed he appeals to young white men who feel economically disenfranchised and unrepresented. One speaker suggests this figure is part of a campaign to discredit legitimate right-wing voices. Concerns are raised about his alleged belief in conspiracies and the idea that Jewish people are a sinister force manipulating American politics. The figure is described as portraying himself as a victim persecuted by a powerful cabal for speaking truth to power, similar to Karen Silkwood. He is accused of making Holocaust jokes and targeting individuals within a specific group. Pat Buchanan's presence is said to discredit certain conversations.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I mean, this is part of the sad thing of happy Canada as far as I'm concerned. Speaker 1: Sad thing is, and I know that no one who watches him will believe me. Speaker 0: That does raise issues that I think are important. Speaker 1: Doesn't mean everything he says is false. It's it doesn't mean he's not talented. He's enormously talented. Doesn't mean he's a bad person. I'm not attacking him personally. Speaker 0: I mean, I think that, you know, the sovereignty of the American military, etcetera. Mean, these are not just crank issues. Speaker 1: It's young white men who've been totally cut out of our economy, attacked mercilessly. I mean, they really are the victims, and they're desperate, and no one speaks for them. So they go to Fuentes because he's, like, incredibly articulate, and they think he's our leader. Speaker 0: But unfortunately, Pat Buchanan raises them in a Speaker 1: way that I think is discredited. But he is clearly part of a campaign to discredit non crazy right voices. Speaker 0: Pat Buchanan is part of the reason it's so hard to have that conversation because he discredits it by his by his presence. Speaker 1: That's a campaign to destroy credible voices on the right, and Fuentes is part of it. Speaker 0: And that he believes in conspiracies and and that he believes that the Jews are this sinister, secretly organized force trying to affect American politics. And those aren't discussions I think normal people sober people should be having. Speaker 1: Anyway, like, who is this kid exactly? Mhmm. And maybe it's just an accident that the guy goes after, exclusively goes after people who are in the same, roughly the same. And then he gets up there and he's like, you know, making Holocaust jokes. Speaker 0: When attacked, he can always fall back on the line, well, the, you know, the tiny cabal that controls American politics doesn't like me because I speak truth to power. This is actually incidentally almost verbatim what he said the other day that I offend the plutocracy, that I'm a wanted man by the inside the Beltway people, and in in in every sense cast himself as a as a victim who is sort of a Karen Silkwood of politics. Someone who's so truthful that he's being hunted down by the by the conspiracy that runs Washington. I mean, it's it's all a bit much.
SpeakWithDeeDee
Posted - October 2, 2025 at 12:29 AM
Saved - October 2, 2025 at 11:25 AM

@SpeakWithDeeDee - SpeakWithDeeDee

Regardless of what you think of Tucker Carlson, he was spot on here. https://t.co/421pWlDTLt

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers identify TikTok as the “most important purchase” and name X as the other key platform, stressing the need to talk to Elon. They describe an on‑camera remark by a foreign leader as “censoring Americans” and include “This guy runs a country of 9,000,000 people that's totally dependent on our tax dollars to exist.” They argue this underscores the push to “force a TikTok sale” through Congress. They insist “the only reason we have free speech in The United States right now is because of Elon Musk.” They also claim “Free speech is central to the entire idea of America” and contrast it with “not our market economy” but “freedom of speech.” They contend the censorship drive aims to silence opposing views in the United States and emphasize engaging Elon to address the issue.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And the most important purchase that is going on right now is glass Followers. Five followers. No. Box? Speaker 1: TikTok. TikTok. TikTok. Speaker 0: Number one. Number one. And I hope it goes through because it's it can be consequential. Mhmm. And the other one what's the other one that's most important? Oh, Alex. X. Mhmm. X. Oh. Speaker 1: Successful. Very good. Speaker 0: And, you know, so we have to talk to Elon. He's not an enemy. He's a friend. We should talk to him. Now if we can get those two things, we get locked, and I could go on on other things, but that's not the point right now. We have to fight the fight. Speaker 1: It's almost unbelievable that he said that on camera. Imagine. This is a foreign leader bragging about how he's censoring Americans. Again, this guy runs a country of 9,000,000 people that's totally dependent on our tax dollars to exist. And here he is on camera, he's a sophisticated guy. He of course, he knows that he's being filmed saying, anyone who opposes me in The United States who opposes more aid to Israel or opposes getting sucked into war with Iran, which does not serve American interest, that person is not simply mistaken or wrong. I'm not gonna bother to explain why that person is wrong. That person is a Nazi, part of the woke Reich, a Nazi. And the only way to fix it is by preventing Americans in the last country on Earth with guaranteed freedom of speech, prevent Americans from hearing the other side. And so we push congress to force a TikTok sale, which is true, by the way. And when that happened and various members of congress, like, no. Really, it's about China. There were people in line who said, no. I think it's really about Israel. You you you kinda wish it was about China. Here he is just admitting. No. No. No. We pushed the US congress to censor in The United States to commit censorship in The United States because we think it's bad for us, and we need to talk to Elon. The only reason we have free speech in The United States right now is because of Elon Musk. By way, a naturalized American, a foreigner who looked at The United States and said, what's great about that country? People can say what they believe because they're not slaves. They're not subjects of the state. They're citizens of a nation that they own. Free speech is central to the entire idea of America. In fact, it's really the only thing that sets us apart from any other country on Earth. It's not our market economy. It's freedom of speech. Speaker 0: And
GozukaraFurkan
Posted - October 12, 2025 at 1:55 PM
Saved - October 13, 2025 at 7:42 AM

@GozukaraFurkan - Furkan Gözükara

Tucker Carlson Bravo Great Strength Speaking Truth so Loudly https://t.co/PjbcpIIFS1

Video Transcript AI Summary
"this is a good thing because it brings The United States into a conflict that we've been involved in on an existential level for decades." "There was an Israeli spy ring in The United States, and they clearly knew nine eleven was coming." "They aired it." "They're real people." "They're not crazy." "Those are factually true statements." "How many Shiite terror attacks have there been in The United States in my lifetime? Let me do the math." "Zero." "Don't tell me that the greatest threat we face is Iran. That's a lie." "You're telling it on behalf of a foreign power." "Iran is not even in the top 10 list." "Our problems would include tens of millions of foreign nationals living illegally in my country." "Nobody knows their identities." "A drug crisis that's killed millions of Americans over the past twenty years." "My family was attacked." "It's true." "And everyone kind of knows it's true."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Benjamin Netanyahu on camera right after said this is a good thing because it brings The United States into a conflict that we've been involved in on an existential level for decades. Mean, he said that out loud. I'm not guessing you can pull the tape. We know that a group of Israeli art students who clearly were not art students, clearly some of them were aligned Israeli intelligence, were arrested and held for quite some time in The United States before being released without charges. And we know that a group of them, again, I'm quoting an FBI document here, not the Internet, filmed the attacks on nine eleven, and I'm quoting, seemed to have foreknowledge of those attacks. Now you were not allowed to follow-up in any of this. Fox News did a series with Brit Hume and Carl Cameron, which many people have seen in a bootleg version on the Internet, but they did it, like, within weeks saying, what is this? There was an Israeli spy ring in The United States, and they clearly knew nine eleven was coming. This is Fox News. They pulled that under pressure. They pulled that off the Internet. It's not searchable in any Fox News archive, but they aired it. I know the people who who did it. Of course, I worked with them for years. They're real people. They're not crazy. In fact, they're pro Israel, but they had a fact set before them, and they reported it, which is called journalism, and subsequent generations have been forbidden from noting what is now factually true. Those are factually true statements. Now we tried to interview some of those people. One lives in The United States in California and made no headway whatsoever, and we knew as we did it, the way, that we're gonna be attacked as anti Semites. It's very unwise to use military force without a clear achievable object objective that serves the American national interest. In fact, it's not it's not allowed to use it under any other circumstances. And in that case, I was concerned and remain concerned that this focus on Iran is not actually connected to our national security. How many Shiite terror attacks have there been in The United States in my lifetime? Let me do the math. Zero. So don't tell me that the greatest threat we face is Iran. That's a lie. You're telling it on behalf of a foreign power. Maybe they feel the greatest threat they face is Iran. It's not the greatest threat we face. It's not an endorsement of Iran. Okay? Doesn't make me a simp for the Shiites. It just makes me an American who's trying to think clearly about what our problems are. And our problems would include tens of millions of foreign nationals living illegally in my country. Nobody knows their identities. They would include a collapsing economy that makes it very hard for my children to have children and live the life that they grew up with and and their friends and all American kids. Would It include a drug crisis that's killed millions of Americans over the past twenty millions of Americans over the last twenty years. Iran is not even in the top 10 list. So you can scream at me all you want and call me names and call me a bigot or whatever, but I just there's no evidence to support that. And so if the energy of the US government is focused on a threat that's not the primary threat to us, it is by definition ignoring threats that are, and that's a kind of negligence. And so I pointed that out. I was, you know, roundly attacked. My family was attacked. Whatever. I don't care. It's true. And everyone kind of knows it's true.
JamesMelville
Posted - October 15, 2025 at 2:37 PM
Saved - October 15, 2025 at 11:48 PM

@JamesMelville - James Melville 🚜

“Imagine a government that totally destroys the country (which is criminal behaviour) and then criminalises complaining about it. And the point of that surveillance is not to keep you safe but to punish you for noticing what they are doing to your country.” ~ Tucker Carlson https://t.co/J8a3de9WIZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that when a government criminalizes dissent and punishes people for criticizing it, it becomes a tyranny rather than a legitimate government. They claim that this kind of surveillance state is aimed not at safety but at punishing citizens for noticing government actions, and that this behavior marks a fundamental breach of human rights. The speaker rejects the idea that this is a right-wing issue, insisting it is a basic observation about rights and freedom. They compare the situation to a surveillance-heavy regime and suggest that even countries widely recognized as tyrannies have not reached the level of control described, while also noting that their own country has become a surveillance state. The point is that the purpose of surveillance is punitive rather than protective, and the speaker asserts that no privacy equates to no freedom. In a personal anecdote, the speaker describes going to a tobacco shop to buy cigarettes and finding none available. A Pakistani shopkeeper shows them a cabinet with cigarettes that have disturbing imagery on the packaging, which further unsettles the speaker. The price of a deck of 20 cigarettes is cited as $60, and the speaker expresses disbelief and frustration about being lectured on smoking while other controversial issues, such as fentanyl, are perceived as being allowed or facilitated by the government. The speaker emphasizes that although smoking is unhealthy, it should be a matter of individual choice, not public moralizing or coercive regulation. The speaker reflects on the broader implications of being forced to do things for one’s “own good,” questioning whether such coercion is truly protective or a prelude to obedience. They warn that if the state insists on injecting people with untested compounds or uses force to compel compliance, individuals may become trained to obey even when they disagree, leading to a loss of personal autonomy and freedom. A central assertion is that, at a fundamental level, such a government does not align with the country’s true nature or the rights of its citizens. The speaker urges resistance to what they describe as government overreach, insisting that the government’s actions are not legitimate and that the people have no obligation to tolerate it. They declare, “They are the criminals. You are not the criminals,” and emphasize that the country belongs to the people, not to those who wield power.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Don't like what the government's doing? Shut up racists when you go to jail. They send people to jail. UK, send people to jail every day. And not for standing in Hyde Park and screaming, but for writing it on Facebook. So imagine a government that totally destroys the country, which is criminal behavior, and then criminalizes complaining about it. That's not a legitimate government, that's a tyranny. That's a tyranny. And if that were happening in some widely recognized tyrannical country, East Germany 1975, where everyone's under surveillance. By the way, I don't think East Germany 1975, which was famously the most surveilled nation in the history of the world, I don't think they had seat belt cameras. I don't. No, they didn't. That was too far even for Eric Honiker. He's like, know, that's old fascist for me, I can't do it. So these countries have become, including my own, have become surveillance states. And the point of that surveillance is not to keep you safe, it's to punish you for noticing what they're doing to your country, actually. That's not the behavior of a legitimate government. And if you think that's like a right wing point, you've bought the lies. That's not a right wing point. That's a simple observation about human rights. No privacy, no freedom. Not to mention the endless hectoring. No, it's not your country. I went to buy a pack of cigarettes today. I quit smoking ten years ago, I thought, you know, you can kinda judge a country by its cigarettes. I couldn't find them. I went to this tobacco store. I said, this tobacco store, you don't have any cigarettes? Oh, that's a really nice Pakistani guy. He's like shaking his head like, I know it's crazy. Opens up this cabinet, and I said, what? That's like, what the hell is on your cigarettes? Like, I don't even wanna smoke them looking at that. I was like, you're making me not wanna smoke, mister tobacco store guy. And he goes, I know. I know. And every pack had like a rotted tongue on it or something. And again, I don't smoke cigarettes anymore. But I'm an adult man who pays his taxes. If I wanted to, I should be allowed to. Right? You can certainly you can do fentanyl here with the government's help. But you can't smoke a Marlboro without being lectured? It's I did ask how much they cost. It was $60 for a deck of 20. And I said to the guy, I literally, I don't wanna smoke, and I've never said that in my life. And I know everyone's like, well, smoking's bad. Yeah. Of course, smoking's bad. Lots of things are bad. But it's not really anyone's business, is it? I guess wearing a seat belt's a good idea. I mean, I don't, but my kids say it's a good idea. But when they're forcing you to do things for your own good, over time you question like, is this really for my own good or are they just softening me up to obey? So when it really comes down to it, when they want to inject me with some creepy compound that hasn't been tested, that they'll be able to like shoot me with a rubber bullet if I decline. And I'll be so trained to be obedient that I'll kind of put up with it. And I won't do what I should do, it's just stage like don't want to say that, I'm gonna get arrested. I shouldn't put up with that. Because that is not a free country, that's a tyranny, and you have absolutely no obligation under the most basic precepts of human rights and natural law to put up with that for one second. Period. They are the criminals. You are not the criminals. They don't care about your country, which belongs to you. So when they tell you it's not your
Bobby1_x
Posted - October 28, 2025 at 2:42 AM
Saved - October 29, 2025 at 12:30 AM

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Is Tucker Carlson is a CIA asset? Yes. And here's 30 minutes-worth of proof: https://t.co/UPRNcgWihR

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 3 launches a documentary-style indictment of Tucker Carlson, asserting he has “many connections Tucker Carlson has to the CIA and other groups,” that Carlson is “leading a major part of America off a cliff with his false conservative platform,” and that he is “a total shill, a puppet being used to distribute propaganda.” The speaker argues the left-right paradigm is false, claiming CIA agents train people in media propaganda regardless of network (CNN or Fox). Anderson Cooper is cited as an example, with the claim he interned at the CIA and was born into the Vanderbilt family, making him the face of CNN and Carlson the face of Fox. The speaker then traces Carlson’s background in detail: born 05/16/1969 in San Francisco; his father Richard Carlson divorced and remarried Patricia Swanson; Carlson attended multiple boarding schools in Switzerland and Rhode Island; graduated from Trinity College in 1991. The claim is made that Carlson attempted to join the CIA after graduation but was denied, with the suggestion that his journalism path was encouraged by his well-connected father. The narrative then catalogs Carlson’s father’s career: Richard Carlson started in journalism as a copy boy at the Los Angeles Times and a UPI reporter; later worked at several LA and San Diego outlets; became involved with San Diego Federal Savings and Loan (headed by Gordon Luce, a Reagan-era figure); ran for mayor of San Diego in 1984 and lost; Reagan announced his nomination to the United States Information Agency in 1986; served as Director of Voice of America, described as a propaganda broadcasting division; VOA is linked to the CIA, with the assertion that its purpose shifted from abroad broadcasting to domestic and international propaganda, including a CIA black site in Thailand (Cat’s Eye/Detention Site Green). The father’s later roles included ambassador to the Seychelles and CEO of King World Public Television; he became vice chairman of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (an Israel-lobby-linked group). The speaker asserts that Carlson’s path mirrors his father’s, arguing that Carlson’s early journalism work included policy review (Heritage Foundation publication), where Heritage Foundation’s founders (Paul Wyrick, Edwin Feulner, Joseph Coors) are described as influential, with Feulner allegedly connected to KCIA donations and UN reform task forces linked to CFR and the Project for the New American Century. The Heritage Foundation’s funding is linked to Coors, Chase Manhattan, Pfizer, Dow, Sears, GM, Amoco, Mobil, with David Rockefeller’s Chase Manhattan leadership invoked to support broader conspiratorial links among the Rockefellers, Rothschilds, CFR, and related networks. The claim is made that Buckley and Crystal (William Crystal) were CIA-connected or staffed, and that Tucker Carlson’s journalism career spanned outlets including Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Weekly Standard, New York Magazine, Reader’s Digest, Slate, Esquire, The New Republic, The New York Times, The Daily Beast, The Wall Street Journal, and television work for CNN, PBS, MSNBC, before Fox News. The video then connects Carlson to Murdoch’s News Corporation (which also owned The Weekly Standard) and to Genie Energy, with other board members named such as Jacob Rothschild and James Woolsey; Carlson’s overlap with Rockefeller- and Rothschild-linked networks is highlighted, including Charlie Rose’s Vanity Fair article about a Rothschild–Rockefeller merger and Rose’s program history. The speaker argues “these overlaps” explain why Carlson ridicules 9/11 skeptics and avoids addressing Rothschilds on his show, implying his gatekeeping role. A separate segment covers a Washington, DC climate-conspiracy joke by a city official about Rothschilds controlling the climate, followed by a joking discussion about microaggressions at UC Santa Cruz. Speaker 3 reiterates the claim that Carlson is “CIA?” and contends mainstream media is controlled, citing Operation Mockingbird as a precedent. The speaker concludes that even if direct government documentation isn’t present, Carlson’s numerous connections and the overlaps among the elites make his CIA linkage plausible to believe, urging viewers to do their own research and turn off the television. The transcript then shifts to a late-appearing discussion involving a Ron Paul event in Minneapolis (2008) with speakers debating 9/11, Building 7, and government involvement, with participants sharing mixed views on 9/11 conspiracy theories, evidence, and the appropriate stance on such claims. Towards the end, Steven Jones, a Brigham Young University physicist, offers a televised segment presenting a hypothesis that explosives might have contributed to the World Trade Center collapses, including Building 7, mentioning molten metal in basements, thermite, and a kink in the collapse symmetry, while acknowledging FEMA’s report noting only a low probability for the conventional (fire) hypothesis and calling for further investigation. The exchange ends with a brief acknowledgment of the need for follow-up by viewers. A final red-string/prophecy monologue introduces a biblical-tinged conspiracy frame involving “Jews” and “the red string,” Rahab the harlot, and spies, cutting off before a concluded point.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You're about the most unordinary person I know. You're an elitist. You're an asshole. Speaker 1: Yeah. I don't know. I'm a but see, I'm an out of the closet elitist. I don't run around pretending to be a man of the people. I'm absolutely not a man of the people at all. Speaker 2: How do you pay your bills? Speaker 1: Well, I'm, like, extraordinarily loaded just from, like, money I, you know, inherited. Speaker 0: You're a trust fund baby, are you not? Speaker 1: No. Completely. I've never needed to work. I mean, it's all just the whole cable news thing was like a phase I was going through. Speaker 3: I will document the many connections Tucker Carlson has to the CIA and other groups. The reason I'm doing this is because right now, he is leading a major part of America off a cliff with his false conservative platform. He rages about the elite and how America seems to be going down the drain when he himself couldn't be more connected to these same elites helping to do it. He is a total shill, a puppet being used to distribute propaganda. What people need to realize is the left and right paradigm we are given is entirely false. Whether you watch CNN or Fox, you are getting CIA agents highly trained in propaganda, usually coming from wealthy families. Take Anderson Cooper for example. He admittedly interned at the CIA and was born into the Vanderbilt family. He could be called the face of CNN just as Tucker is the face of Fox. Follow me as I take you through his career and document his highly suspect rise in journalism. Don't forget to take notes and research these things yourself. Tucker Carlson was born on 05/16/1969 in San Francisco, California. When he was six years old, his father Richard divorced his mother Lisa and married Patricia Swanson, one of the heiresses to Swanson Enterprises most notable for their TV dinners. Carlson attended many boarding schools during his youth, including locations in Switzerland and Rhode Island. He graduated from Trinity College in Connecticut in 1991, which is known as one of the Little Ivies, which are a group of private schools which compete with Ivy League schools. Supposedly, Tucker attempted to join the CIA when he graduated, but his application was denied. I can't find an explanation as to why he wanted to be in the CIA or why they rejected him. His father was a very well connected man in the media industry and encouraged him to pursue journalism because, quote, they'll take anybody. His father Richard started his career in journalism at the young age of 22. He had jobs as a copy boy at the Los Angeles Times as well as a reporter for United Press International, which at the time was one of the largest newswire services in the world. He worked for a few TV stations in Los Angeles and San Diego before joining San Diego Federal Savings and Loan in 1977. The bank was headed by Gordon Luce, who was the former public affairs director for Reagan. Richard became vice president of finance within three years, and during this time, the bank had a lot of political controversies due to their connections to current and former members of the Reagan administration. In 1983, he decided to get into politics, and in 1984, ran for mayor of San Diego. He lost to his opponent, Roger Hedgecock, who was later forced from office in 1985 after it was revealed he received over $350,000 illegally during his campaign. Coincidentally, he would also go on to become a conservative radio host. In 1986, using his connections to the White House, Reagan personally announced his intention to nominate Richard as associate director of the United States Information Agency. He became Director of Voice of America, which was a propaganda broadcasting division of USIA. He served as their longest running Director. Voice of America started in 1941 when President Roosevelt established the Foreign Broadcast Information Service as a program directed by the Office of Strategic Services, which became the CIA. The intention stated publicly was to communicate America's views abroad, but it was really an outfit to disseminate propaganda. The first few broadcasts for Voice of America were done over British Broadcasting Corporation transmitters but expanded rapidly and fell under control of the Office of War Information in 1942. The Office of War Information was tasked with creating distributing propaganda domestically and internationally. They did this through various means such as broadcast, newspapers, posters, films, and other media. The agency was terminated by President Truman in 1945. Their offices were transferred to the State Department and most of their responsibilities were transferred to the CIA. It should also be noted that a Voice of America relay station in Thailand was used as a CIA black site referred to as Cat's Eye or Detention Site Green. These overlaps and connections between Voice of America and the CIA should not be glossed over. In 1991, Richard Carlson was personally nominated by President George H. W. Bush to be The U. S. Ambassador to The Seychelles, a nation of islands off the Eastern Coast Of Africa. In 1997, he became CEO of King World Public Television, which was later purchased by CBS in 1999 for $2,500,000,000 He became the vice chairman of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, which is an organization that is part of the Israel lobby in The United States. It was founded by Clifford May, who was also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, the project for the new American century, and vice chairman of the Republican Jewish Coalition. Now you're starting to see that it was no mistake Tucker wanted to join the CIA and become a journalist, like father, like son. Tucker Carlson got his start in journalism when he was hired as a fact checker for policy review. This was a publication put out by the Heritage Foundation. The Heritage Foundation was founded in 1973 by three men: Paul Wyrick, a political activist and commentator Edwin Feulner, an academic who attended London School of Economics, which is a Rothschild controlled school, who was also advisor to different government agencies and domestic policy consultant to Reagan, and last but not least, Joseph Coors of the Coors Brewing family. In 1975, Congress investigated the activities of the Korean Central Intelligence Agency in The US. Mr. Feulner had met with the KCIA station chief, Kim Young Hwan, and in the early nineties, the Heritage Foundation started receiving donations from the KCIA. It should also be noted that in 2005, Mr. Feulner was appointed to a task force on UN reform, which included such people as former CIA Director James Woolsey with the goal of achieving a more effective United Nations. The task force was also supported by the Council on Foreign Relations. In 1977, Paul Wyrick hired a man named Roger Pearson to write for policy review. In 1986, an intelligence agency watchdog publication called the Covert Action Quarterly documented Pearson's connections to James Jesus Engelton, who was the former chief of CIA counterintelligence, as well as Daniel Graham, former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency. The Heritage Foundation was largely funded by Joseph Coors through his family wealth, but it also received funding from Chase Manhattan Bank, Pfizer, Dow Chemical, Sears, General Motors, Amoco, and Mobil. David Rockefeller was CEO and Chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank at the time. It should also be noted that David's grandfather, John D. Rockefeller, who started the Standard Oil Company, had to break it up due to antitrust laws, and Amico, as well as Mobile, were once part of the company. John D. Rockefeller also donated the 16 acres of land upon which the United Nations headquarters sits in New York. In David Rockefeller's O Memoirs, he is quoted as saying, some even believe we, the Rockefeller family, are part of a secret cabal working against the best interest of The United States, characterizing my family and me as internationalist and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure. One world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it. He also funded and was chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations. A quick little fun fact. Before the homosexual political commentator David Brock, founder of Media Matters for America, a leftist propaganda outlet which received funding from George Soros and given office space by alleged pedophile and human trafficker John Podesta, he was on the board of the Heritage Foundation. He supported Hillary Clinton for president twice and dated James Alifantis, has been accused of being a pedophile and human trafficker. He is also a friend of Lynn Rothschild. Lynn Rothschild supposedly abhors Trump and fawns over Clinton publicly, yet her and Trump go way back as well. Also, here's a photo of Trump laughing it up with happy Rockefeller, wife of former vice president and New York governor Nelson Rockefeller. It's a great example to show you that these people are all liars and actors. They will fill whatever role they need to fill when they need to fill it. Sometimes that involves swinging to the total opposite side of the false paradigm politically if it's advantageous to the agenda of the elite. Pick your central banking puppet, left or right. It's all controlled, and these people are shameless whores. When Tucker Carlson left his job at policy review, he went to work for the Arkansas Democrat Gazette under the tutelage of editor Paul Greenberg. Mister Greenberg was very well connected having his pieces published across 1,400 different newspapers within the Tribune Content Agency Syndicate at the time. He also won a Pulitzer Prize in 1969 and appeared on major television networks as commentator on talk shows such as Charlie Rose. Now I can't actually prove that mister Greenberg was CIA, but when I started to look at a few publications he put out, it made me start to wonder. In one article entitled How to Break the CIA, published on jewishworldreview.com 09/02/2009, he defends the CIA from what he believes to be unfair persecution. He defends the torture of possibly innocent people as justified in the, quote, war on terror. When referring to the torture of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, he says, are we supposed to be sorry about that and proceed to punish those who uncovered these plans? On what theory? That no good deed for your country should go unpunished? He also boohoos about the morale of the CIA and how investigations might increase their agents' anxiety. In another article by Mr. Greenberg entitled Hooray for Snooping, published in the Arkansas Democrat Gazette October 2333, he talks about a national conference of editorial writers he attended in Calgary, Alberta in the seventies or eighties. In the article, he says that, quote, that year at Calgary, one solemn resolution proposed that we stop talking to the CIA since a number of journalists abroad had been assassinated on the pretext that we were all CIA agents, capitalist spies, tools of imperialism, and, well, you know the rest. As if the killers were so lacking in imagination, they couldn't come up with some other excuse to do away with us if they hadn't invented this one. So there we were, an all too solemn convention assembled, First Amendment or no, debating whether we should gag ourselves. I dissented, being an American, and unaccustomed to being told whom I could talk to or not talk to. Memory grows furtive, but I believe the resolution was defeated. That it was ever considered was disgraceful enough. It occurs to some of us that if the CIA and FBI and NSA had been allowed to talk even to each other before 09/11/2001, that date might not have become another one that will live in infamy. If only big data could have been mined back then the way it is now, the country might have been a lot safer along with the thousands of innocent victims who found themselves in the Twin Towers that fateful day and others rushing to their rescue as firefighters and cops, and the troops who were stationed at the Pentagon as airliners were turned into flaming engines of destruction, their passengers and crews wiped out, including those who, like the ones aboard Valiant Flight United 93, were the first to mount a counterattack against the terrorist in the still continuing war. It would seem mister Greenberg, a very well connected columnist, was very sympathetic to the ambitions of the CIA for seemingly no reason. It should also be noted he was Jewish and a Zionist. When Tucker left the Arkansas Democrat Gazette, he went to work for the Weekly Standard News magazine in 1995. It was founded by William Crystal and Fred Barnes. William Crystal is Jewish and the son of Irving Crystal, who's been described as, quote, the godfather of neoconservatism. Irving Crystal was also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and worked for the Congress for Cultural Freedom. The Congress for Cultural Freedom was a group started by a Jewish CIA agent named Mikkel Jocelyn in 1950. It distributed anti communist propaganda in 35 countries and published over 20 magazines. In 1966, The New York Times are in a series of articles exposing it as a front for the CIA to transfer money to the State Department and the United States Information Agency, the same agency which broadcasted Voice of America, which Tucker's dad was the director of. In the book, Finks, How the CIA Tricked the World's Best Riders, author Joel Whitney talks about, quote, how the good versus bad CIA is a false divide and that the cultural cold warriors again and again used anticommunism as a lever to spy relentlessly on leftist and indeed writers of all political inclinations and thereby pushed US democracy a little closer to the Soviet model of the surveillance state. He alleges that Crystal was in fact a CIA employee, The man who referred to Irving as the godfather of neoconservatism was a man named Jonah Greenberg, also Jewish and editor in chief of The National Review, a semimonthly magazine. The magazine was founded by William F. Buckley Jr. And has played a significant role in the development of conservatism in The United States. Like Krystal, Buckley was also outed as a CIA employee in Joel Whitney's book. It should also be noted that Fred Barnes, cofounder of The Weekly Standard, currently moderates a show on Voice of America called Issues in the News, again, the same program Tucker's father, Richard, was director of. It would seem William Crystal was also a fan of Paul Greenberg, Tucker's first mentor at the Arkansas Democrat Gazette since he quoted him in an article he published in the Washington Examiner 11/01/2004 entitled the 09/11 connection. In the article, he quotes Paul as saying, everything we had thought, assumed, expected in the golden nineties hadn't been so. The surface piece of the nineteen nineties had been bought at a great price. On nine eleven, a failure of American leadership was revealed, a failure to look ahead and act forcefully to forestall threats, to do what Bush has called, quote, the hard work of fighting terror and spreading freedom. William's father Irving, alleged CIA employee, also only had kind words to say about mister Greenberg when he wrote the forward to his 1991 book, Resonant Lives, 50 Figures of Consequence. He said, and I quote, our intellectual and spiritual elites today are, with some notable exemptions, semi educated at best. This explains why someone like Mr. Greenberg has not received the recognition he deserves. Oh, yes, he has won a Pulitzer Prize and other awards, which is nice, but these are tributes to his journalistic talents as a columnist and editorial writer. As a master of the brief moral essay, he has yet to come into his own. These men all seem to connect to one another in some way, and they all seemingly support the, quote, alleged war on terror while increasing the size of the government in the name of preserving freedom. They protect Israel and promote their agenda while scapegoating Muslims for false flag attacks meant to justify giving more power to their think tanks and intelligence agencies which answer to nobody except the people lining their pockets. After leaving The Weekly Standard, Tucker then went on to write for New York Magazine, Reader's Digest, Slate, Esquire, The New Republic, The New York Times, The Daily Beast, and The Wall Street Journal. He would also go to work on camera for CNN, PBS, and MSNBC before finally settling into his role at Fox News as the poster boy for conservative values. During those years, he also somehow found time to appear on shows like King of Queens, 30 Rock, and Dancing with the Stars. While he is now on Fox News as arguably their most popular personality, this wasn't his first tango with News Corporation, which owns Fox News. News Corporation owned by Rupert Murdoch also owned The Weekly Standard where Tucker worked under Bill Crystal. News Corporation headquarters is located in none other than the Rockefeller Center Complex in New York. Rupert Murdoch is also on the board of Genie Energy, an American energy company located out of New Jersey. Other noteworthy people on the board of Genie Energy include Jacob Rothschild, the head of the Rothschild banking dynasty, and James Woolsey, former director of the CIA, who, if you remember earlier, was also on the UN reform task force in 2005 with Heritage Foundation founder Edwin Feulner, whose goal was to create a more effective United Nations, the same United Nations which resides on land donated by John D. Rockefeller. In a 2015 article written by Charlie Rose in Vanity Fair, he details a merger between Jacob Rothschild and David Rockefeller. Rothschild bought 37% of shares in Rockefeller Financial Services through his RIT Capital Partners. This is the same Charlie Rose who would have Arkansas columnist Paul Greenberg on his show to talk politics and the same Paul Greenberg who was held in such high regard by William Crystal and his father Irving. There are so many overlapping connections that can be made that I probably missed dozens, if not more, during my research into the topic. Given these connections to the CIA, the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, etcetera, it's no wonder Tucker Carlson ridicules people who believe that 09:11 was an inside job and calls these people parasites. It's also no wonder Tucker Carlson won't seriously address the Rothschilds on his show as his boss probably wouldn't be too happy even though they have so much control and influence. Whenever people bring up legitimate issues, it's his job to mock them so his viewers won't get to the truth of the matter. Speaker 4: Washington DC experienced a mild snowfall last week. Luckily, city councilman Trayon White was on it. He knows why it happened. Watch this. Speaker 5: It's just started snowing out of Speaker 6: nowhere this morning, man. Y'all better pay attention Speaker 5: to this climate control, man. This climate manipulation, and DC keep talking about we are resilient city, and that's a model based off the Rothschilds controlling the climate. It should create natural disasters they can pay for to own the cities, man. Be careful. Speaker 4: Yep. The Rothschilds control the climate. The Rothschilds, of course, are a wealthy Jewish banking clan. They're included in a great many conspiracy theories, but those theories rarely give them credit for the weather. That's an ambitious new twist. Mark Stein is an author and columnist and a part time meteorologist, and he joins us tonight. What are you making? So this is by the way, I live here, so you can laugh all you want, but that's actually my city councilman speaking there. The Rothschilds control the weather. Did you know that? Speaker 7: Well, I did actually, Tucker. They've they they bought the weather from God back in 1929, when he had a bit of a liquidity problem after the Wall Street crash, and, they keep it in the wine cellars at the Chateau Mouton Rothschild estate in France. And, they're able to micro target the climate. For example, it was light snow in your part of Washington, but I gather in the stairwell of Trayon White's, apartment building, he actually had an avalanche just on his floor. That's that's how micro targeted the big Jew weather machine is able to be. Speaker 6: And he may and, by the way, Speaker 7: you may you may think it's a light snowfall, but if you actually examine it, it's actually small pieces of gefelter fish, which is why it doesn't melt. And that's why the Jews control the snowplow business. So they scoop all the gefelter fish in Washington away, and they use it to make Louis Farrakhan calypso albums, which they put out to discredit, Louis Farrakhan from telling the truth about the synagogue of Satan. It all makes sense. Speaker 6: See, the funny thing is I mean, I don't Speaker 4: know if it's funny. It's actually so appalling and shocking that it's it's hard. I'm just gonna laugh about it. That was that was you made me feel better about a city out of control. So then I wanna run this by you. May maybe you can make me feel better about this too. There's a new uproar on social media over microaggressions at UC Santa Cruz. The school has assembled a list of microaggressions. Tucker Speaker 3: Carlson seems to be everywhere. He has become the face of the conservative and right wing movement in The United States, surely due to the incredible amount of connections he has to intelligence agencies and the government. This is why the gatekeepers and the media attempt to give him credibility and publish stories like how he's being spied on by the NSA or how a seemingly random man confronted him in Montana at a fly fishing shop and insulted him trying to start a confrontation, and it turns out that the man was actually an employee of the Asia Foundation, which was created in 1951 by the CIA as a front organization to distribute propaganda. If you had any doubts before watching this that Tucker Carlson was controlled opposition, I hope the research I presented will put that to bed. Mainstream media is all controlled in its one big incestuous pit. Don't worship these people as heroes because they will sell you down the river in a heartbeat. Is Tucker Carlson CIA? Well, you can't prove that directly, but once you pour through all of his connections, you would find it incredibly hard not to believe that is the case. About the only thing we're missing at this point is official government documents detailing as much, which I am sure will come out at some point in the future. The CIA has a very long and documented history of infiltrating and controlling the media. Operation Mockingbird is a great example of that. Tucker Carlson is just one of many examples you could make. Remember to always do your own research and turn off the television. Speaker 6: Good to see you after, we met briefly at the event in 2008 in Minneapolis for Ron Paul. Speaker 1: Oh, that Speaker 6: was fun. Speaker 2: I remember that. Speaker 6: But but you had to leave early. What happened? The Speaker 2: truth is stopping. The truth is stopping. I'll tell you why. Speaker 1: I didn't bail on Ron Paul. No. Speaker 6: I don't Speaker 2: It's when Jesse Ventura got up and started saying 09:11 was an inside job. Speaker 6: He didn't say that. Yeah. Speaker 2: Yeah. He did say that. Answer your question. Sure. It wasn't controversial. It was stupid. And if there's any evidence that the government is behind nine eleven, looks you know, I believe anything if there's evidence, but there isn't any. So knock it off. That's my view. Speaker 6: Okay. But And Speaker 2: I said that to him. Speaker 6: Sure. Sure. Speaker 8: But one stupid person says something Speaker 6: stupid at Ron Paul event. Speaker 2: No. No. But I I hate that. And and by the way, I am open to almost any crackpot theory about anything. It's just on that subject, come on. You know what I mean? That's too much. That even for me. Speaker 6: So just out of curiosity then, what what's your take on Building 7? Which explanation do you believe? Speaker 7: Yeah. Come Speaker 6: on. It's like it's a slick. No. That's a serious question. Which explanation did did Speaker 2: it Okay. Which explanation? Speaker 4: I I There's two explanations. Speaker 6: It was either it was it was pulled or it was isolated pockets of fire on the building that blew that that were Let Speaker 2: me let me get let Speaker 6: me The towers coming down. They're coming down. Speaker 2: This a no win conversation, so I'm not gonna continue it. But let me just say one The macro my macro view is is the obvious one, which is the buildings came down. There's a bunch of nutcases. We're playing into them. Speaker 6: Okay. So are you still supporting Ron Paul? So are you supporting anybody in the race this year? No. Speaker 2: I don't support. I mean, I don't even vote. I don't even vote. I'm hardly objective. I'm honest. I'm not objective. Speaker 6: There you go. Certainly not afraid to speak your mind. Speaker 2: No. I'm not. No. You can assess my views. They're very clear. You don't have any But I hate that nine eleven crap. Wish they just kicked those people out. Speaker 6: I mean was supposed to be on the ninety third floor. Really? Oh. It's important for people and their families still involved to know the truth whether or not the government was involved or whether it was terrorists, but there's a history of government sponsored terror throughout the past century. I'm Yeah. Exactly. So what do you mean kick them out? Speaker 1: I don't know. Whatever. Speaker 6: You you anyone who's a 09:11 intruder should be should be kicked out of the the country? Of course not. I don't, you know, I don't Speaker 2: I don't even believe in parking tickets. I mean, didn't you please? I just don't I think that people, before saying something that heavy, ought to present real evidence and not just it's a coincidence or the questions remain a dumb Speaker 6: I think like steel doesn't weaken until 2,400 degrees is evidence that that jet fuel couldn't cause a collapse of the tower from being at Speaker 2: the top. Except the thing is it did. Speaker 9: So Speaker 10: problem. We we gave them a lot Speaker 6: of money. Speaker 10: See, see, pretty much trained them. I mean, mean, that's that's pretty much enough evidence for me. Speaker 2: Did the government brought down the Twin Towers? You know Speaker 10: what? The government that the government was involved in bringing that into our because they would not Speaker 6: be trained because who because who trained them? The government trained them. The CIA trained them. The special ops trained Speaker 2: them. Alright. I've I've had this debate so many times. It's not you know, I don't know. I just it it seems to me that it it's kinda beneath, sort of beneath, like, adult discourse even, really, I guess. And it and it definitely discredits otherwise good ideas. Speaker 6: I just think that the implications if if the government was involved, the implications are so vast that it should be looked into whether or not it seems ridiculous. Ridiculous. Speaker 11: So for family members of Speaker 6: the victims that are asking questions and want the evidence that's been withheld by the government released, you would say that they're less than adults somehow for wanting that Speaker 2: I would say that parasites like you make it much worse for them. That's what Speaker 10: I would say. Speaker 12: I'm a parasite now? Speaker 2: Yeah. It's it's filthy to say things like that with no evidence, and you have none. So you should stop. That's my point. Well, this is deal with this Speaker 10: is insult of politics today. Speaker 4: Back. Millions of people watch the horror of 09:11 right before their very eyes live on television. Two planes crashing into the World Trade Center. And less than a couple of hours later, both towers, of course, collapsing. My next guest says that hijackers may not have brought down the towers by themselves. Here to explain his controversial theory, Steven Jones. He's a professor of physics at Brigham Young University in Provo, Utah. Professor Jones, thanks for coming on. Speaker 9: Sure. Thanks, Tucker. Speaker 4: Well, just sum up this, obviously, your theory, the one sentence that I just explained in the intro contradicts what we all think we know about how these towers collapsed. Quickly sum up your explanation for what happened. Speaker 9: Well, I'd like to start with this paper that you referred to. It's available online. What I'm doing, Tucker, is presenting evidence, but it's a hypothesis to be tested. That's a big difference from a conclusion. And so I just wanted to clarify that. But to sum up, I've looked at the official reports by FEMA and so on regarding the collapse of these buildings. I'd like to look at the collapse of Building 7 in just a minute. It was not even hit by a jet. So we should look at that one. Speaker 4: Two towers. The explanation has been that the fire inside was so intense that it weakened the structural steel and that each floor collapsed collapsed down upon the next in a pancake fashion and they imploded in on themselves. Is that essentially I think what people think? Speaker 9: Doctor. Yeah. That's basically it. Yeah. And so what I've done is to analyze these reports. I would like to do a little experiment with you, Tucker, if I could. I sent out a video clip of the collapse of Building 7 because most people haven't actually seen that one and that's the crux of the argument I'm presenting. Speaker 4: Sum up very quickly the argument for us. You believe there were explosives in the buildings planted by someone, detonated. Speaker 9: Is that correct? In other words, hypothesis to be tested there's two hypotheses here. One is fire and damage caused all three buildings to collapse. The other is that explosives in the buildings may have caused the collapse. And so then we analyze and see which fits the data better, and I've done that in my in my 25 page paper. Speaker 4: I wanna read you a quote from the Deseret Morning News, a paper in Utah from you. I'm quoting now. It is quite plausible that explosives were preplanted in all three buildings and set off after the two plane crashes, you, which were actually diversion tactic. Muslims are probably not to blame for bringing down the World Trade Center buildings after all. That's, I would think, pretty offensive to a lot of people listening. Do you have any evidence for that? Speaker 9: Well, not to the Muslims, I might say. I've got a lot of emails saying Speaker 4: I'm sure your writings have been greeted with glee in Islamabad and Peshawar and places like that. Speaker 9: Well, I haven't received any notes from there, but just good people. I have Muslim friends. Let me read for example, but I'm not going to let you off the hook. Really want to do this experiment with you. Speaker 4: We don't have lot of time for experiments, Professor, but if you could just give us one thing to hold on to. You make these claims or appear to make these claims. Do you have any Speaker 9: collapse of Building 7. Can you roll the video clip that I sent to you? Speaker 4: Okay. I'm not sure Speaker 1: if we Speaker 4: can, but to specify that is World Trade Center Building 7, smaller than the other two, not hit by a plane, of yet it collapsed. Speaker 9: Right. It's 47 stories. Speaker 4: That's right. Speaker 9: 24 steel columns in the center. Right. Trusses asymmetrically supported. Now, I can't see what you're seeing. Speaker 4: Are you rolling that? No, we just see the building. And just so our viewers know, the explanation that I think is conventional is that there was a large tank of diesel fuel stored in a lower level of that which caught fire and the resulting fire collapsed the building. Speaker 9: That's basically it. But as we read in the FEMA report, it says here, and I put this in my paper, of course, the best hypothesis, which is the only one they looked at, the fire, has only a low probability of occurrence. Further investigation, analyses are needed to resolve this issue and I agree with that. But they admit there's only a low probability. And if you look at the collapse, see what I've studied is the fall time, the symmetry, the fact that it first dips in the middle, that's called the kink, which is very characteristic, of course, of controlled demolition. Speaker 4: Professor, that we are out of time and I'm not sure that you've J. Speaker 9: One fully other thing I want to mention Speaker 1: about Doctor. Speaker 4: Okay, if you can hit it, Speaker 6: really quick. Speaker 9: Doctor. Here we go. Molten metal in the basements of all three buildings. Yet, all scientists now reasonably agree that the fires were not sufficiently hot to melt the steel. So what is this molten metal? It's a direct evidence for the use of high temperature explosives such as thermite. Thermite produces molten iron as an end product. Okay. So, we do have Yeah, it's very short time, but people will read the paper, then I talk about the molten metal, the symmetry of the collapse, and the weaknesses and inadequacies of the fire hypothesis. Speaker 4: Professor, we're going to have to leave it to our viewers who are interested enough to follow-up to do just that. We appreciate you coming on. Even if I don't understand your theories, we appreciate you trying to explain them. Thanks. Okay. Speaker 13: The red string is a symbol to show the Jews that they are helping the Jews usher in the new world order. The reason they do it is so that the Jews spare them from the nasty population that is happening. Not many people are allowed to live in a new world order. In the Old Testament, the book of Joshua, God was giving the Israelites the land of Canaan. Joshua sent in spies. The Canaanites found out and were searching for the spies. The spies got help from a harlot called Rahab. The Canaanites went to Rahab's house, and she told them she did not see anyone. When they left, Rahab, the harlot, made a deal with Israelite spies. Since she helped the spies, she asked that they spare her and her family. The Israelite spies agreed and Rahab let them down on a red rope from the on the wall, and the spies escaped safely. The Israelites killed all the Canaanites except Rahab and her fam
TheMilkBarTV
Posted - November 9, 2025 at 10:44 AM
Saved - November 9, 2025 at 10:20 PM

@TheMilkBarTV - Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

You really want to play this game with Tucker Carlson? The man's been on the wrong side of every issue only until it was profitable not to be (Israel included) - he worked at CNN, MSNBC & PBS. https://t.co/5vBVjpfBpX

Video Transcript AI Summary
- Tucker Carlson Today debuts with Douglas Murray as the chosen guest, presenting him as someone with “crystal clarity” on global and national events, though Carlson previously described Murray as clever but not an expert on anything. - Carlson discusses Trump, saying he would not be a good president and would likely cancel the next election if elected; he adds, “We didn’t understand the country we preside over,” encompassing both the political class in DC and those with authority or money in the United States. - A speaker quotes Carlson stating, “I hate him passionately. I can’t handle much more of this.” and notes Carlson saying, “We are very, very close to being able to ignore Trump most nights,” adding that Trump is a “demonic force, a destroyer, but he’s not gonna destroy us.” - Carlson mentions following Bobby Kennedy Jr. at a Donald Trump rally in Madison Square Garden as part of discussions on American politics and national sentiment. - In an aside about foreign policy and allies, Carlson says: “America’s supporting Israel because it’s an ally,” and notes that Qatar is a close ally with “the largest American air base in The Middle East” located there. - On global health, the discussion references “The Chinese coronavirus” as a major event that will affect life, adding that it’s “definitely not just the flu,” and includes a claim about past flu deaths versus COVID, with one remark questioning if anyone they know died of COVID and noting uncertainty about that. - The conversation touches on military ethics and civilian harm, with a claim that incinerating tens of thousands of civilians would be “a bad thing,” and then a provocative line about not calling for nuclear weapons against Ayatollah if there’s a belief in a murderer with nuclear weapons. - A controversial topic is raised about teenage sexuality, asserting that a 15 to 17-year-old boy is biologically driven to procreate and faces a choice between harming a peer emotionally or seeking a safer, though illegal, outlet with a professional partner; the stance is framed as “harm reduction.” - There is a reference to Emmanuel Macron, with a claim that he was 14 or 15 when he met someone, and a challenge to the assertion that it is wrong or child molestation; the broader point is about Buchanan’s argument that American involvement in World War II may have been a mistake, inviting scrutiny of that view. - The host recounts a summer after freshman year spent in Nicaragua to engage in war, linking to broader foreign policy debates about war and citizenship. - A provocative claim is made that anyone who serves in a foreign military should lose his citizenship immediately. - On Sharia law, the transcript states: “Sharia is intolerant. Women have, in the Quran, fewer rights than men do. I think that in every Muslim majority country in the world, non Muslims are treated, have fewer rights. Sharia law is bad, Seth. I don’t know if you’ve heard that. It’s bad. It’s worse than what’s happening in New York and Detroit. It’s just bad.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello, and welcome to the very first episode of Tucker Carlson Today. We had a broad range of possibilities for the first person to talk to as we begin this new show, this new series. But really, in the end, there was only one choice. The one person we know who has crystal clarity on what's happening, not just in this country, but in the world, someone who's watched it and chronicled it for years now. His name is Douglas Murray. I know Douglas, and I think that I'm always gotten along with him, I think he's clever, but he's hardly an expert on anything. Well, Mike, what? I don't think Trump would be a good president. I think he'd probably cancel the next election if he got elected. You know? It happened because we didn't understand the country we preside over. And by we, not just the political class in DC, but anybody with authority or money in The United States. Speaker 1: Referring to Trump, Carlson says, I hate him passionately. I can't handle much more of this. Speaker 0: We are very, very close to being able to ignore Trump most nights. I truly can't wait, Carlson texted. That Trump is, in his words, a demonic force, a destroyer, but he's not gonna destroy us. It's such an honor to be here, and it's wild. Just another day following Bobby Kennedy junior at a Donald Trump rally in Madison Square Garden. I mean, what? America's supporting Israel because it's an ally. I don't even know what those words mean. I'm just saying my principles. They're ally. Right? I mean, they they both what that means to be an ally. Qatar is, like, one of our closest allies in the world. The largest American air base in The Middle East is in Qatar. They're a close ally of ours. The Chinese coronavirus is a major event. It will affect your life. And by the way, it's definitely not just the flu. Oh, so thousand twelve, 2013, I read up, More people died of the flu that year than COVID did. Yeah. Would you know anyone who died of COVID? Did people really die of COVID? I don't know. I never knew anyone who did. Technology. They've only been used once. If you end up killing, incinerating tens of thousands of civilians, that's just a bad thing. Let's let's just be honest. That's just a bad thing. And I just don't understand why you're not calling for the use of nuclear weapons against the Eyatollah right now. I'm serious. If they're if you really believe there's a murderer nuclear weapons. See, whatever is the case. So you're a 15 to 16, 17 year boy. You're you are driven by biology to procreate. Yes. You're either going to be inflicting your attentions on one of your peers who is, let's be honest, not ready for it. She's gonna get hurt emotionally. Or you can have a safer, albeit technically illegal outlet with someone who knows what she's doing. You're not gonna hurt her. You know what I mean? Like, this is harm reduction. Speaker 1: Now admitting that Emmanuel Macron was only 14 when they met, when he was in that play. 15, she says, whenever this affair happened. Speaker 0: I'll just go with 15 and say that's wrong. Yeah. Isn't that child molestation? Theme, it's the it's the larger point that Buchanan is making that perhaps American involvement in World War two was a mistake that that that people are upset about and that I think you can take him to task over. Because I think it's a it's a wrong and in some ways an odious point. I think the story we got about World War two is all wrong. I think that's right. And you can hardly say that this country won that war. In what meaningful sense? The summer after my freshman year, my roommate and I decided to go down to Nicaragua for the summer and work and, you know, get involved in the war. Think anybody, by the way, who serves in a foreign military should lose his citizenship immediately. Sharia is intolerant. Women have, in the Quran, fewer rights than men do. I I think that in every Muslim majority country in the world, non Muslims are treated, have fewer rights. Sharia law is bad, Seth. I don't know if you've heard that. It's bad. It's worse than what's happening in New York and Detroit. It's just bad.

@MsBlaireWhite - BLAIRE WHITE

Dude who pushed the COVID vaccine and Iraq war says someone else is sabotaging America. https://t.co/Y6zeIWnSDA

GiganteRicardo9
Posted - November 25, 2025 at 6:54 PM
Saved - November 27, 2025 at 8:21 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A participant, Jonathan, clarifies his identity, says he has been targeted by an international influence operation, and accuses others of gatekeeping and subversion, promising hard receipts and exposing alleged networks around Flynn, Palantir, and related groups. In reply, GiganteRicardo9 denounces the others, streams strong confrontations, and accuses various figures and actors of conspiracies and manipulation, vowing to reveal the truth and react.

@GiganteRicardo9 - Ricardo Gigante

Now that my 12-hour timeout is over, we’ll address some key housekeeping (gatekeeping) items… 1. My name is Jonathan. It’s not Johnny or Richard or Ricardo or ‘whatever it is’. And you already knew that. Madz. 2. They targeted me first as part of a much larger and internationally-organized informational influence and gatekeeping operation. Choosing to fuck with me was THEIR royal fuck up. Not mine. Many have done so in the past and found out just like they will. 3. What list is that? Is it the one where I’m the only dude who actually lives in America and who’s White, Christian AND male, and you’re the fgts living in France, Guatemala and Australia? Cool. I added you. 4. Unfortunately for you (and them), I don’t lie. I just work harder and happen to be a gazillion times smarter than all of you combined. But most of all, I’m not a subversive fucking anti-American sellout on foreign soil pretending I’m qualified to arbitrate who and what are acceptable for America… and I keep better receipts than you can possibly fucking imagine. I’m the dude the Flynn network traitors collab’ing with Unit 8200, NATO, Cerberus and BigTech fears more than anyone else here. If you hadn’t learned that by now, that’s your own fault. So you’re about to learn a hard lesson. 5. You didn’t hear that. Okie doke. Now that all THAT’S outta the way, let’s discuss why Alladin considers General Flynn (Unit 8200; NSO/OSY/Q Cyber) a legend and Ivan Raiklin (Bolshevik/Israel/J6/Flynn) a buddy. And why he’s ‘fiercely protective of his sister @DataRepublican, and @TPASarah (CIA; VP of Ukranian Operations) and @StealthMedical1 (IDF)’. And why he chose the week after my account received a worldwide blackout to begin running his ‘Israel is not the bad actor’ campaign with meowllion’s ‘intel’, while simultaneously going after Candace Owens and simping for Seth ‘Chabad Lubavitch/Libs of Tik Tok LLC/Premier Speakers Bureau (WEF)/Tempus AI/COVID bioterrorists’ Dillon… simply because Candace is (correctly) shining a light on the jew/Israeli murder of Charlie Kirk at UVU. *Alladin - Citing Meowllion’s work* “Israel was NEVER the bad actor.” - Mondomedia “When I get there I will show you why exactly Israel is not the bad actor here.” - Alladin “Looking forward to the the joos psyop being debunked.” - PatriotPup “Stay tuned.” - Alladin And why Infowars fgts are so hellbent on gatekeeping information about George H. Zinn AND Zachariah Qureshi, while also pretending CIA alums like John Kiriakou ‘have no idea what Palantir does’. *HINT: It’s because it takes down ‘the joos’ AND the LDS Mafia, who’ve treasonously collaborated with the CCP (Tsinghua University; Echo Liu; Epoch Times; Duke Kunshan University) and Li Ka Shing/Richard Li (Bridgetown III Holdings; Matt Danzeisen/Peter Thiel/Daniel Wong/BlackRock/Salesforce/CrowdStrike/Team8/Unit 8200/Eric Schmidt/UC-Berkeley/Jennifer Doudna/COVID/Tempus AI) behind the backs of the United States of America for MORE THAN TWO DECADES, if not far longer. Or why they thought funneling their disinfo to DataRepublican thru fgts like Alladin, Lisa Logan, SKDoubleDub33, SeeJay714, etc. would work. Especially since I’d ALREADY exposed the DataRepublican grift (and her handlers, Laura Loomer and Sloan Rachmuth), and my previous alt got nuked for JUST EXPOSING their direct ties to JEW TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS like BETAR (KAHANE CHAI) and operatives like RONN TOROSSIAN and SLOAN RACHMUTH. Or why they thought I wouldn’t fucking figure out that in the first George H. Zinn space I was in and couldn’t get a mic, which was co-hosted by @RyanMattaMedia and @BasedSamParker, that Matt Baker (Infowars) was one of the few speakers who DID get a mic. And that another of the speakers was some South African dipshit nobody had ever heard of… …or that @IanMalcolm8, who was ALSO on that speaker’s panel, had temporarily UNFOLLOWED me so I couldn’t DM him to tell the hosts to give me a mic either. Weird. Since GEORGE ZINN was OUR SHIT.

@Madz_WhereWeAt - Madz

@GiganteRicardo9 Really Johnny or Richard or whatever it is. You going there with @eaglebckp & @Meowllian. You might elsewell put me on that list also since the truth about you is out. Keep up the lies ‘Ricardo’ & from what I have heard you ain’t that ‘Gigante’.

@GiganteRicardo9 - Ricardo Gigante

You fgts almost got away with it too. Damn. It’s a shame I’m a literal fucking genius.

@GiganteRicardo9 - Ricardo Gigante

Get COMPLETELY fucked. Cunts.🖕

@GiganteRicardo9 - Ricardo Gigante

PS: Yo, Alladin! How’s the DOGE audit horseshit coming along? About as well as the IDF/Mossad/Flynn Ntwk spaces and Jake Lang’s ‘it’s da Moooslims’ world tour, I’d imagine. And as well as his ‘defamation lawsuit’ where he’s supposedly suing his own NAPALM colleagues, amirite? I’d say it looks to be going at LEAST as well as the Betar/Kahane/JDL domestic terrorism operations in America, imo.

@GiganteRicardo9 - Ricardo Gigante

Gosh, this ‘you just DoN’t UnDeRsTaNd WhAt PaLaNtIr DoEs’ horseshit sounds SO familiar. Now WHERE have I heard it before. Oh. Imagine THIS. Both dudes, Alladin (and SeeJay714) & Eliano Younes, are referring to CIA alum John Kiriakou, no less. Small world. Unfortunately, some of us DO know exactly what Palantir does, what it’s DONE and what ‘they’ plan for it to do next. Which is why WE will make sure it NEVER FUCKING HAPPENS. And we’ll gladly bet our lives to prove it to you fucking traitors. Get fucked.

@GiganteRicardo9 - Ricardo Gigante

Wait, you mean to tell me @elianoayounes, a self-described ‘Palantirian’, was also ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT at JOHNS HOPKINS MEDICINE from JULY 2016-APRIL 2020, where they held EVENT 201 to ‘war game’ a global CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK, exactly 29 DAYS before COVID MADE LANDFALL in the United States? Gosh, it kinda sounds like he’d know who Alvin KRONGARD is too. Amirite, Eliano?

@unklereichman - Eddie Gein

@GiganteRicardo9 More on Eliano... He's quite connected. As Head of Strategic Engagement at Palantir (Oct 2024–Present), Younes interfaces with Israeli military/intelligence entities, given Palantir’s role in shortening the “kill chain” for Ukraine -- parallel tech used by IDF.

@GiganteRicardo9 - Ricardo Gigante

*And last but not least… these last four might actually be my favorite nuggets of all.🇺🇸🫡 Get the fuck out of our country before you can’t.

@GiganteRicardo9 - Ricardo Gigante

Suddenly, this ‘influencooor’ CASINO shit seems relevant. I wonder if it was Ryan and Oscar who showed Elijah Schaffer around in El Salvador last week. Good stuff, Sir Escanor!🫡

@EscanorReloaded - 🔥Sir Escanor (𝘏𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘶𝘮 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘳)🔥

The BIGGERZ Casino Psyop and the Influencers Who Took the Bag 💰 By Sir Escanor, Agent of Suffering™️ “world’s #1 casino” run from… Serbia, Pakistan, France & Africa 🥴 Totally normal. Totally legit. Nothing screams “trusted betting platform” like Serbian mind-control and a Pakistani SIM card activated by penguins in Madagascar. The BiggerZ corporate structure =no structure Here’s what is actually verified about BiggerZ: •Operated by CDK Play Inc SRL •Licensed by Anjouan Offshore Finance Authority (aka: the new Curaçao for people who think money laundering laws are “too restrictive”) •No listed owners •No public leadership •No transparent corporate registry •No physical office •No jurisdictional footprint •Connected via Serbia App Store •Promoted by half the internet overnight like a coordinated opioid relapse Translation: It’s a crypto casino run out of a mailbox near Madagascar. Affiliates and shills? ALL sus. EVERY “Alpha Trader”, “Crypto Expert”, “Marketing Guru” and “BiggerZ Partner” magically appeared from: 🇵🇰 Pakistan 🇷🇸 Serbia 🌍 West Asia 🇫🇷 France (connected via Serbia) But they claim they’re from: 🇺🇸 “USA bro trust me” 🇦🇺 “Australia mate” 🇬🇧 “London finance expert” Yeah, sure. All while connecting from the Pakistan Android App Store. This is not a betting platform. This is the League of International Scammers speedrunning the American IQ test. And your favorite influencers? They ALL took the money. Here’s who promoted BiggerZ in identical wording, identical timing, identical scripts: •Morgan Ariel •Stew Peters •Elijah Schaffer •Pearl Davis •Jake Shields •Matt Wallace •Sam Parker •Crypto Wizard •Jack Wallace •And a dozen other patriots and truthers.. Every single one of them forgot to ask: Who owns BiggerZ? Where does the money go? Why are all affiliates from Pakistan and Serbia? Why is CDK Play Inc SRL registered in the Bermuda Triangle? Why is the license from Anjouan, an offshore island off Madagascar? But the moment the wire hit? Oh my god guys!!!! $20,000 in one day!! BIGGERZ IS INSANE! Reality check: This is an unregulated, offshore black hole. When a company is: • Offshore • Unregulated • Ownerless • Jurisdiction-less • Connected through Balkan telecom • Powered by Pakistan • Promoted by influencers who didn’t research shit …it means they want your money flowing into a financial void they control, completely untraceable, completely unaccountable. This isn’t a casino. It’s a digital sinkhole for liquidity extraction. And the influencers get a cut of everything you lose? Meanwhile, “Researchers” on X didn’t notice a thing These same people can decode: •Masonic patterns in Trump’s tweets •mind control in Taylor Swift concerts •Shadow government comms and hidden history …but somehow missed: A Serbian-Pakistani-Madagascar casino funneling American money into an unlisted offshore corporation. 😂😂😂😂 GTFOH Not one of them asked questions. Not one of them followed the money. Not one of them warned their audience. Because the grift always comes before the truth. Apply pressure. Flood their replies. Make them answer. Ask every influencer: •Who owns BiggerZ? •Why are affiliates from Pakistan & Serbia? •Why didn’t you disclose payments? •Why should Americans trust a casino licensed by a tiny island government near Madagascar? They took the bag. They owe you answers.

@GiganteRicardo9 - Ricardo Gigante

Oops, still had these. My previous account received a worldwide blackout on October 30, 2025. On November 2, 2025, I sat in Keith and meowllion’s space for nearly an hour (~45 minutes) with a standing ‘speaker request’ that never gets answered, despite also tagging Meowllion in several of the group chats we’re both in and repeatedly asking her for a mic. A week later, Keith and meowllion give ALLADIN, a well-known bad actor and IDF operative, a mic in their space AND even allowed him to advertise his GoFundMe, so listeners can donate to his ‘patriotic’ efforts. This was brought to our attention by my friend, The Fringe, in a GC that Meowllion and I (and Keith too, I think) are part of… “Ahh Keith? You let up the IDF guy? Gave him props for his post? Let him advertise his GoFundMe? WTF? He’s legit telling you he’s in Ukraine.” - The Fringe Good times. Lol. No, I’m not sorry for sandbagging. Get. Fucked.

@GiganteRicardo9 - Ricardo Gigante

You are confused. And much further out of your depth than you realize.

@Madz_WhereWeAt - Madz

@PChungus69 @GiganteRicardo9 @eaglebckp @Meowllian Bring it bitch. You have no idea.

@GiganteRicardo9 - Ricardo Gigante

For starters, Palantir (operation warp speed) knowingly covered up the inefficacy and nephrotoxicity of remdesivir (March 8, 2020) and covered up the incredible efficacy, safety, affordability and wide availability of HCQ (March 16, 2020) as COVID therapeutics… because their EVP, CTO and COO, Shyam Sankar, is also CHAIRMAN of GINKGO BIOWORKS (CIA; Baillie Gifford; Mossad) and had already brokered an ‘mRNA vaccine optimization’ deal with MODERNA and an AI-based therapeutics/vaccines R&D facility deal with BAYER and ROCHE... then in 2022, Palantir appointed DEBORAH BIRX, the scarf cunt who’d handed over all U.S. COVID-19 patient data/DNA to Palantir (and HHS), to their GOVERNMENT ADVISORY BOARD.

@SKMAFIA420 - SK

What if those that don’t know needed to find out what would you tell them those things are that they did, are doing and plan on doing are?

@GiganteRicardo9 - Ricardo Gigante

Gosh, this ‘you just DoN’t UnDeRsTaNd WhAt PaLaNtIr DoEs’ horseshit sounds SO familiar. Now WHERE have I heard it before. Oh. Imagine THIS. Both dudes, Alladin (and SeeJay714) & Eliano Younes, are referring to CIA alum John Kiriakou, no less. Small world. Unfortunately, some of

@GiganteRicardo9 - Ricardo Gigante

You can almost hear the screaming.

@PennyDread88 - PD Giver of Trophies™ 🏆

@GiganteRicardo9 All of them. Every single one. 🔥

@GiganteRicardo9 - Ricardo Gigante

😎🇺🇸🫡

@SKMAFIA420 - SK

@GiganteRicardo9 Saved this one so he has something to read while facing the wall

@GiganteRicardo9 - Ricardo Gigante

*MARK KELLY & GEORGE H. ZINN* Something tells me the illegitimate Senator from Arizona, his CCP/Mossad-funded ‘SPY BALLOON COMPANY’, his recent overt act of SEDITION with the U.S. MILITARY, his ADL B’nai B’rith (Mossad) gun-grabber wife (Gabbie Giffords) and his meeting with George H. Zinn are all gonna be EXTREMELY relevant to the plot going forward, folks. 💥NOTE: Mark Kelly colluded in his blatant act of sedition with several other illegitimate ‘Dems’, including CIA jew, alleged cannibal and illegitimate MI Senator, Elissa Slotkin. Mark Kelly’s campaign was run by SKDK (Israel/Rockefeller/Rothschilds/TwitterX bots for Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs/FEMA CUNT - Jaclyn Rothenberg) and Left Hook.

@GiganteRicardo9 - Ricardo Gigante

George H. Zinn met Mark Kelly (CCP/JDCA/Mossad) and his ADL B’nai B’rith wife, Gabby Giffords, who is a gun-grabber working for Michael Bloomberg (Mossad)? Gosh, the George H. Zinn links I/we exposed within 24 hours of Charlie Kirk’s murder have cost me 6-7 accounts and unmasked several pretenders in my immediate orbit. I’m sure that’s all totally unrelated, sports fans.

@icu_luci - ICUlUↃI

@RealCandaceO I know you're in a crazy situation right now, but I want to point out that George Zinn personally met Mark Kelly, and said that he was one of his favorite politicians despite Kelly being a Democrat.

@GiganteRicardo9 - Ricardo Gigante

Agreed. Well said, @LucasGageX.

@LucasGageX - Lucas Gage

Fuck everyone in this picture. Fake ass fucking Christians lmao. You scamming pieces of shit.

@GiganteRicardo9 - Ricardo Gigante

@LucasGageX I’d forgotten that Elijah Schaffer is tied to The Wellness Company (Coulson/Flynn/DARPA) too. What. A. Shame. GREAT find, @TheActaFist777!🙏🔥🫡

@TheActaFist777 - TheFringe 💫🏴🔥🤍🔥

@GiganteRicardo9 Elijah Schaffer->> Rift TV (TWC). The Wellness Company. & Blaze Media.

@TheActaFist777 - TheFringe 💫🏴🔥🤍🔥

@DakotaSidwell @FeignerGnosis @RichardEntuboca @Ryansikorski10 @MaryAnn_Warrior @DawnC1235 @jessez @realColinWyse @KristieIushkova @jwoodworthtalks @stevie_nickels @oraclestargate @Imbackbitches45 @ric_wonders @jamaica_witch @psinergy_SDW @AngelaMaggard3 @TrueNorth444 @Americaonly9 @remotelyrising @jeannita @sch96305 @jwtmdmba @JulieBove81 @Truthtellerftm @RedpillDrifter @Morphicvibes @Eleventhstar1 @DarrellBuckne13 @FranticMissy @Flynn2022 @Crypt0ph3r_ @dznutzurface @Dawn_T_TKA @Johnathan_Merce http://www.coulsoncapital.com (Coulson). http://www.twc.health (Wellness Company). http://www.rifttv.com (Rift TV). http://www.theblaze.com (Blaze Media). Elijah Schaffer CEO of Rift TV (Coulson Capital), worked for BLAZE (Betsy Devos/ Erik Prince sister)💥

Coulson Capital coulsoncapital.com
The Wellness Company Own Your Health twc.health
RiftTV | Political News, Media, and Entertainment Fighting the stupidity of the American Left with truth, humor, and lots of personality. Competely Unfiltered. rifttv.com
Blaze Media | News, opinion, and entertainment News, opinion, and entertainment for people who love the American way of life. theblaze.com

@TheActaFist777 - TheFringe 💫🏴🔥🤍🔥

@DakotaSidwell @FeignerGnosis @RichardEntuboca @Ryansikorski10 @MaryAnn_Warrior @DawnC1235 @jessez @realColinWyse @KristieIushkova @jwoodworthtalks @stevie_nickels @oraclestargate @Imbackbitches45 @ric_wonders @jamaica_witch @psinergy_SDW @AngelaMaggard3 @TrueNorth444 @Americaonly9 @remotelyrising @jeannita @sch96305 @jwtmdmba @JulieBove81 @Truthtellerftm @RedpillDrifter @Morphicvibes @Eleventhstar1 @DarrellBuckne13 @FranticMissy @Flynn2022 @Crypt0ph3r_ @dznutzurface @Dawn_T_TKA @Johnathan_Merce http://www.coulsoncapital.com (Coulson). http://www.twc.health (Wellness Company). http://www.rifttv.com (Rift TV). http://www.theblaze.com (Blaze Media). Elijah Schaffer CEO of Rift TV (Coulson Capital), worked for BLAZE (Betsy Devos/ Erik Prince sister)💥

Coulson Capital coulsoncapital.com
The Wellness Company Own Your Health twc.health
RiftTV | Political News, Media, and Entertainment Fighting the stupidity of the American Left with truth, humor, and lots of personality. Competely Unfiltered. rifttv.com
Blaze Media | News, opinion, and entertainment News, opinion, and entertainment for people who love the American way of life. theblaze.com

@GiganteRicardo9 - Ricardo Gigante

@LucasGageX @TheActaFist777 Good stuff from Tucker Carlson. But please be advised, he’s the moderate position. God help ALL of you if someone like me, who’s been targeted by these lying traitors and lost everything, ever gets power in America. (It’d literally be the Golden Age of America.)

@SilentlySirs - SilencedSirs◼️

🇺🇸🇮🇱A media earthquake just hit America — and it SLAPPED Israel harder than anything before. Tucker Carlson — the most influential conservative host in the U.S., a man Israel considered an unshakable ally — just turned on them with a level of bluntness no American TV figure ever dared. On air, in front of millions, he dropped the bomb: “There is no such thing as ‘God’s chosen people.’ God does not choose child-killers. This is heresy — these are criminals and thieves.” This wasn’t commentary… This was a declaration of war on the entire Israeli narrative. And he didn’t stop there. Carlson exposed the anger boiling inside America: “350 million Americans are struggling to survive, and we send $26 billion to a country most Americans can’t even name the capital of.” That clip hit 48 million views in 9 hours, and a CNN poll later showed: 🔹 62% of Americans agree with him. 🔹 Support for Israel is collapsing inside the U.S. itself. Then came the shocker — a direct message to Trump: “I supported Trump… But focusing America’s money, energy, and foreign policy on Israel is a betrayal of his promises.” The fallout: • Massive public shift against Israel • Conservatives breaking ranks • The political establishment panicking • Israel losing its strongest media shield The truth is now mainstream: For the first time in decades, Americans are openly questioning the entire relationship with Israel — and they’re not backing down. #IsraelTerroristState

@GiganteRicardo9 - Ricardo Gigante

I know… ‘stop, they’re already dead!’ and whatnot, but it seems like these fgts will forget who you are, just because you might rock new alts/handles every other week nowadays. So to help these treasonous fuckers remember going forward, here’s one last little tidbit before we bring in the cleanup crew to deal with all the scattered bodies. MATT BAKER👇 Hey, look! It’s JAKE ‘Israeli Air Force Sister’ LANG and all his NAPALM homies. Turns out, they’re the fucking crypto scammers too! Elijah Schaffer is even part of The Wellness Company (Flynn Network/Coulson Group/DARPA), whose parent company (Coulson Group) has the aerial firefighting contracts with Los Angeles during the West Hollywood/Palisades fires (arson attack), but were oddly nowhere to found while… 👺KAREN BASS (M19/LA Mayor/NED Vice Chairman) 👺KENNETH WOLLACK (AIPAC National Legislative Director/NED Chairman) 👺PETER J. ROSKAM (Sidley Austin Partner/Apollo Global Management Legal Counsel/Republican Israel Caucus/Benghazi House Committee/Bipartisan Task Force to Combat Antisemitism Co-Chair) 👺ELISE STEFANIK (NED Director/Daniel & Margaret Loeb & EcoHealth Alliance/McKinsey & Co./NY House Rep/Congressional University Antisemitism Hearings) 👺BEN SASSE (In-Q-Tel [CIA] Trustee/NED Director) 👺ELLIOTT ABRAMS (NED Director/Holocaust Memorial Council/JINSA) …burned down Los Angeles to treasonously destroy lives and livelihoods of AMERICAN CITIZENS and SCAM THEM OUT OF THEIR HOMES/LAND, by COMMITTING HOME INSURANCE FRAUD w/STATE FARM, RAA, KAISER PERMANENTE, RENAISSANCERE and CHABAD LUBAVITCH.

@GiganteRicardo9 - Ricardo Gigante

Don’t worry, I got Matt Baker with Elijah ‘I fled to El Salvador (The Wellness Company/Tether/Cantor Fitzlutnick/Rumble/Bukele/JD Vance/Narya Capital/Thiel/Andreessen/Schmidt/Case) because of Kash Patel’s mean PragerUnit 8200 GF’ Schaffer too. And Matt Baker with DiligentDenizen (RawsAlerts lol). And Matt Baker with Shawn ‘The CIA Coke & Cartel Kingpin’ Ryan. And Matt Baker celebrating his birthday partying in Mexico two weeks ago with his wife, ‘CeeCee’. Get COMPLETELY fucked, fgts.🖕 *NOTE: Steve Case (Revolution Group/JDV’s former boss/AOL Co-Founder/Tempus AI/CLEAR) was paid off for $60,000,000 by George W. Bush Foundation at the Clinton Global Initiative, and his cousin is who vouched for General Mike Flynn’s brother, 4-Star General Charles Flynn, while Charles was still running point in Hawaii. We learned of General Charles Flynn during the Lahaina/Maui Directed Energy Weapons arson attack (Booz Allen Hamilton/Hodgins family/Case family) in late-2023.

@GiganteRicardo9 - Ricardo Gigante

@LucasGageX @TheActaFist777 *KEY ADDITION: Peter J. Roskam was also NED Vice Chairman (alongside Karen Bass) as the LA FIRES were happening. Roskam has since been named CHAIRMAN of NED. https://t.co/pAy55XQz0I

@GiganteRicardo9 - Ricardo Gigante

@LucasGageX @TheActaFist777 💥PLOT THICKENS: Turns out, UTAH’S GOVERNOR held closed-door meetings with the AMBASSADOR of EGYPT & the CONSUL GENERAL of FRANCE, just 13 DAYS AFTER CHARLIE KIRK WAS MURDERED at UVU. What. A. Gat. Damned. SHAME.😒🤬🖕

@GiganteRicardo9 - Ricardo Gigante

*EGYPT & FRANCE* Wait, UTAH’S GOVERNOR met with the AMBASSADOR of EGYPT and the CONSUL GENERAL of FRANCE, just 13 DAYS AFTER CHARLIE KIRK WAS ASSASSINATED, eh? Gosh, that’s gotta be an unmitigated fucking DISASTER for FedSoc/Edmund Burke/A3P/Zinn/Skjervem/Hammer/Chamberlain/Davis/Poso/Human Events/TPUSA and the rest of the Charlie Kirk murder accessories. *Stares MOTHERFUCKERLY at FRANCE😒* *SPOILERS: Watch out for IDAHO here next, folks. Skjervem is APFC Investment Advisory Group (with George H. Zinn), CIO for the State of Utah retirement system AND an Advisor for the IDAHO retirement system. 💥NOTE: SHELDON GILBERT (LDS Mafia), the December 2024-appointed President of FedSoc and the former Senior Counsel of Walmart (Timothy Flynn/UnitedHealth), POSTPONED A previously-scheduled JOINT SPEAKING ENGAGEMENT he had up in IDAHO with the IDAHO PRESIDENT of FEDSOC, which was originally booked for ONE MONTH BEFORE KIRK’S MURDER.

@TheSCIF - The SCIF

Why is UTAH'S GOVERNOR having closed door secret meetings with the EGYPTIAN & FRENCH governments? This happened just 13 days after Charlie Kirk was assassinated. NOBODY can stop the TRUTH from being exposed. @ProjectConstitu wrote: 11:30 AM: Closed-door meeting with Egyptian

View Full Interactive Feed