reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@Naturegirl571 - NatureGirl
Pole shift? Is the Earth standing still? Thoughts? https://t.co/QmiFOdMT8U
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker points out that the sun is still in the zodiac sign of Virgo, even though it should have moved into Scorpio by now. They mention that this has been the case since September 9th, and it is currently October 27th. The speaker finds this unusual and connects it to biblical events and the birth of Nishimura and the comet child. They invite viewers who are knowledgeable about astronomy or astrology to share their insights in the comments.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, everybody. I watched this video today about the sun is still in Virgo. You can see the date on there. It's it's the 27th October, and the sun hasn't left Virgo yet. If today's October 27th, we should be in Scorpio right about right here entering into Scorpio.
But we still haven't even left. The sun has not left Virgo's feet yet. It hasn't even entered into Libra, and Libra is a full month. This is from a video I did on September 9th. You can see down here the date is September 9th.
The sun was is entering into Virgo. Right? The sun is in Virgo, which September 9th is Virgo. So we are well past September and well past October. And literally, we are still in the sun.
The sun is still in Virgo. This is today's capture. Libra is right here. We haven't even touched Libra yet and Scorpio is right here. We should be in the sun should be, like, down here, but the sun is still in Virgo.
Yeah. So kudos to the person who found this. Like, I've ever since, Nishimura and, the comet child came out of the womb of the the the woman, virgin Mary. Things have not been the same since then. Like, things have been very, very weird, especially with all of the, like, biblical events that have been occurring.
And the sun has not left Virgo yet. Like, I have to go back and check the revelations to see, like, how this lines up because this is very weird. Anyway, if you guys know anything about astronomy or astrology, and you know what's going on, let me know in the comments. We can talk about it.
@RealCapeTruther - MASS FORMATION PSYCHOSIS
THE GLOBE IS A LIE.. https://t.co/JDTrg8FLbK
Video Transcript AI Summary
Rain, gravity, and relativity affect our perception of speed, but we can still sense even the smallest earthquakes. Modern science challenges our understanding, suggesting that what seems obvious may not be true, while the extraordinary and outrageous can be explained scientifically. However, it's important to remember that all sciences originate from the human mind and senses. Therefore, our minds will always be superior to the sciences that emerged from them. We choose to trust our minds and senses more than those who believe in a spinning globe.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Rain, reeling, weights of speed, but you can't feel any of it because of gravity and relativity, but you can feel even the slightest earthquake. Oh, okay. Cool story, bro. The problem is that modern science has convinced us that nothing that is obvious is true and everything that This magical, improbable, extraordinary, gigantic, microscopic, heartless or outrageous is scientific. Keep in mind, all sciences originated from the human mind and senses.
So the mind will forever be superior to any sciences that came out of it. We flattered us choose to rely on our mind and senses more than you spinning globe believers do.
@Death6102 - Death
#Firmament 💀 #theglobeisdead https://t.co/PydyAZc6E9
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 mentions a scenario where conflicting beliefs about the shape of the Earth lead to a meeting with the Flat Earth society. Speaker 1 expresses a desire for the younger generation to accept the fact that the Earth is a certain shape.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If I say that the world is round and someone else says it's flat time for a meeting On the flat Earth society. That's worth reporting.
Speaker 1: Now one thing I really want your
Speaker 0: generation to embrace is that
Speaker 1: the Earth is a
@RobotPolisher - Mike Oxbig
Is the earth flat or round? https://t.co/OU0hzWRD8u
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss whether the Earth is flat or round. Speaker 1 argues that it's not okay to say the Earth is flat, citing pictures from space as evidence. Speaker 2 mentions video footage of a rotating spherical Earth. Speaker 3 makes a random comment about robot polishers. Speaker 1 explains that if you observe a boat on a lake, it gradually disappears over the curved horizon, which wouldn't happen if the Earth were flat. Speaker 4 defines science and mentions an experiment by Eratosthenes to determine if the Earth's surface is curved. They discuss the scientific process and the difference between pseudoscience and regular science. Speaker 5 mentions Einstein's explanation of gravity and the possibility of better models in the future. They also touch on the use of light to understand the composition of things. Speaker 7 talks about the conflict between science as a belief system and science as a method of inquiry. Speaker 8 briefly mentions evidence suggesting the Earth's surface is either flat or much larger than believed. The video ends with a comment about academia's role in seeking truth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is the Earth flat or round?
Speaker 1: It's not okay to say that the Earth is flat. It's not okay. We've taken all these amazing pictures from space. They're they're so beautiful.
Speaker 0: All the Pictures from space. Those pictures are not fake.
Speaker 2: We have video of the rotating spherical Earth.
Speaker 1: So I don't really know what's going on right now with this earth is flat thing.
Speaker 3: Not everybody can be a robot polisher.
Speaker 2: One of
Speaker 1: the things you can see yourself, if you actually go out to a lake and there are boats on that lake
Speaker 0: See the bottom of the ship is gone. Now we can see midway Yep. And then
Speaker 2: No longer visible beyond your horizon.
Speaker 1: And that's because the boat is actually going over the horizon that's Curved. That wouldn't happen if the Earth were The boat goes farther and farther away. The last thing we will see is the very top of the mast of that boat. And that's because the boat is actually going over the horizon that's curved. And that means that as it goes farther and farther away, you see less and less of the bottom of it and more of the top of that.
Speaker 0: Make a drop.
Speaker 1: That That wouldn't happen if the Earth were flat. You would simply see the boat getting smaller and smaller and smaller as it went farther away, but you'd be able to see the whole thing with the same proportions. That wouldn't happen if the earth were flat. That wouldn't happen if the earth were flat.
Speaker 0: So the process of testing claims, world is flat, the world is round, is what we call
Speaker 4: Science. What is science?
Speaker 2: It's a famous experiment conducted by Eratosthenes. Tosthenes. Eratosthenes.
Speaker 1: And Eratosthenes noticed that there a town called Syene. And on a certain date, the sun would actually shine straight down to the bottom of a well. That meant the Sun was directly overhead. You could look down a well and see the sun shining back at you. And on the very same date farther away in the city of Alexandria, That didn't happen.
Speaker 2: How can we use this observation to see if earth's surface is curved? We need another well. Turns out, we can't see the bottom of Both wells at the same time. What might explain this? Well, there are 2 possible explanations.
First, we could have a flat earth with the sun that's small and close by so that the light hits the 2nd well at an angle. Or second, we could have a curved earth with a sun that's big and far away so that all the light comes in parallel with a sun that's big and far away so that all the light comes in parallel so that all the light comes in parallel.
Speaker 4: In science, we always say that you make observations, you have a theory, You can go make more observations, and it's a very, very tedious process. Wrong. Nobody that I know of in my field method. In our field, it's by the seat of your pants. It's leaps of logic.
It's guesswork.
Speaker 0: If you have a claim that can't be tested, that's what we call it, SOLOScience.
Speaker 5: He didn't know what gravity was. Einstein gave a better explanation. We're probably gonna get a better model later.
Speaker 3: We're probably gonna Get a better model later.
Speaker 5: We're looking at light, and we are understanding about the materials. Right. We're understanding the composition of things based on light. We're understanding the composition of things based on light.
Speaker 3: We're understanding the composition of things based
Speaker 0: The difference between pseudoscience and regular science is whether or not you can test it.
Speaker 2: No. The TED Observer. It's too far away. It's to be theoretical.
Speaker 1: Is gravity.
Speaker 2: We have no idea. Okay. Next question.
Speaker 4: You cannot reproduce the big bang, but you can then trace the history of of what happened afterwards like a murder mystery, and that's where a lot of science is done.
Speaker 6: All the
Speaker 4: things that were once considered science fiction are now centerpiece in our understanding of the nature of everything.
Speaker 2: The whole science
Speaker 6: Tesla had something to say about those guys. He said today's Scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality.
Speaker 2: Science and science
Speaker 7: Science delusion is the uncritical belief in these dogmas, treating them not as beliefs, but as truths. It's The conflict between science as a belief system and science as a method of inquiry, which is about finding out what we don't know through systematic inquiry, the experimental method, hypothesis and so on.
Speaker 8: Purical evidence tells us that either the surface of the Earth is a flat plane or the planet is at Least 100 times bigger than we are told.
Speaker 0: Science.
Speaker 3: And not everybody can be a robot polisher. Feel that academia As the hold of truth plays an essential role, particularly today.
@0ccultbot - occultbot
Our calendar is not quite right https://t.co/Tj0zmwr8uh
Video Transcript AI Summary
Our calendar is not accurate. It should have 13 months with 28 days each, plus one neutral day called Easter. This calendar is similar to the Mayan and Sanskrit calendars. The names of the months don't match their numerical order. For example, "Sept" means 7, even though it's the 9th month. "Oct" means 8, "Nove" means 9, and "Deck" means 10. January is the 11th month, February is the 12th, and March is the 13th. April is the first month and marks the start of the New Year. We lost a month in the calendar, but its name is not revealed. The Gregorian calendar was created by humans and disrupts our natural cycles, which vibrate at three frequencies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our calendar is not quite right. We're supposed to have 13 months Up 28 days, with one day, the day of resurrection, Easter as a neutral day. That's our 3 65 days. We've actually got 13 constellations, Not 12. This same calendar is very close to the Mayan calendar, But it's also very close to several ancient Sanskrit calendars.
What does Sept mean? 7. 7. I thought that was the 9th month. What does oct mean?
What does nove mean? What does deck mean? It's supposed to be the 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th month. Jan is 11. Feb is 12.
March is 13. April is our 1st month. Babies are born in the spring, the 1st April, Easter. This is the start of our New Year, this is the Start of spring when the flowers start coming up, the grass starts coming up, the trees start leafing out, the babies are born. That's the 1st day, our neutral day, day 1, the day we rest And celebrate the resurrection, the new beginning, the beginning of Christ.
April is month 1. And then we lost a month in there. Where is it? What's it called? We know what it's called.
Not going to reveal it yet, but we know what it's called. But this is a true calendar. The Gregorian calendar is SMU, Ship made up by man. To keep us out of our natural cycles, we all vibrate at 1 of 3 frequencies. Did you know that?
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
WHAT IS T H E G L O B E ? https://t.co/R1MdBACbdb
Video Transcript AI Summary
There are certain areas near the Arctic and Antarctic Circles called no fly zones. These zones exist because there are undisclosed lands in those regions. Captain George Hubert Wilkins, who lived during the same time as Admiral Byrd, flew beyond Antarctica and claimed to have discovered many lands and peoples 5,000 miles further. These lands are intentionally excluded from our maps. The globe represents all the known land, making it a container. International pilots have designated no fly zones to prevent the discovery of these hidden lands.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You heard of such a thing as no fly zones? For instance, you can't fly in certain areas near Arctic Circle or the Antarctic Circle. The reasons being is because there are lands there we're not supposed to know about. I'll give you one example. Sir captain George Hubert Wilkins, a contemporary of Admiral Byrd, flew beyond Antarctica, and he said that he found there many lands and peoples 5,000 miles beyond Antarctica.
They are excluded from all of our maps. The globe is a container, and it's container of all the known land. That's why international pilots have such a thing as no fly zone because they don't want those lands to be discovered.
@Death6102 - Death
The Earth is Flat 💀 #theglobeisdead https://t.co/UbMoD1WLTh
Video Transcript AI Summary
This video captures the awe-inspiring view of Earth from space. The speaker marvels at the beauty of the sky turning darker as they look towards the sun. They mention how most of the atmosphere is closer to the Earth, represented by a thin blue line that sustains life. The speaker acknowledges their need to stay hydrated and mentions they are filming. Overall, they express their amazement and emphasize the incredible experience of being in space.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is incredible. Wow. Yeah. It really is. It never gets old.
Best deal in the world. Getting a little darker up there. Yes. It is. Yeah.
If you look up towards the sun, the sky's pretty much totally black up there. And then as you look closer to the Earth where Most of the atmosphere is. It's where the mouth of it now. You get that nice, thin blue line with all the stuff that keeps us alive. I just dehydrated.
Okay. I'll keep drinking. I'm making movies back here. Awesome. We are really up here.
Oh, yeah. This is incredible. Wow. Yeah. It really is.
It never gets
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
DO YOU UNDERSTAND TIME IS A MANMADE CONCEPT? https://t.co/5LmXOnaeGw
Video Transcript AI Summary
According to German historian Heribert Illig, the year is not 2023, but rather 1726. He claims that the Gregorian calendar is fake and that most of the Middle Ages never happened. Illig believes that three powerful figures from the ancient world, including Emperor Otto, conspired to change the calendar and created false historical events. They allegedly made up 297 years of history, with no significant events occurring between 614 AD and 911 AD. Illig argues that the architecture from the 10th century was too advanced for its supposed time. Some supporters believe this means the Middle Ages were 300 years shorter, altering the timeline of Jesus Christ's death. Illig claims there are documents supporting his theory, suggesting that even the church is aware of the deception.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What if everything you knew about time was a lie? According to German historian, Herobart Illig, the year isn't 2023. It's 17/20 six. The German historian claims that the Gregorian calendar is a fake and that most of the middle ages never happened. It sounds like something a crazy person would say, but Heribert isn't insane.
He's a scientist who says he has archaeological evidence To prove what he's calling the Phantom Time Hypothesis, Erebus says the conspiracy began with pope Sylvester the second, Byzantine Emperor Constantine the 7th and Roman Emperor Otto the 3rd. These 3 powerful men of the ancient world got together and changed the calendar. Emperor Otto wanted his reign to start in the year 1000 AD instead of when it really started in 9 96 AD. The reason behind this was that Otto thought 1,000 sounded a lot better than 9.96. The trio then altered documents and created false historical events to make it happen.
But they didn't just alter 4 years, they made up 297 years of history. The thought process behind the theory is But between 614 AD and 911 AD, nothing historically significant happened. And Heribert says, There are discrepancies between the Julian calendar and the Gregorian calendar. He believes that the architecture in the 10th century It was far too modern for when it was supposedly built. There are now supporters who believe the middle ages was 300 years shorter than it really was.
That would mean Jesus Christ died 1700 years ago, not 2000 years ago, like most biblical scholars would claim. Herbert and others who support his theory Say there are documents that prove it, and, apparently, the church is in on it too, knowing full well that we are living in a completely wrong year.
@historyinmemes - Historic Vids
Flat-Earther suddenly realised that earth isn't actually flat in his own experiment https://t.co/M9MQc6l6Zw
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the exchange, Speaker 0 describes a “backup experiment” designed to test a claim about the shape of the Earth, outlining the conditions under which light would be visible to an observer at different heights. The test hinges on sightlines through a series of holes and the illumination of a light source positioned at specific elevations above the water. The core proposition stated by Speaker 0 is that if one can see through a hole to the next hole and observe light at the backboard or at 17 feet off the water, the Earth is flat. On the other hand, if the light is only visible when the light source is held higher—specifically at 23 feet—then the Earth is curved. In other words, the claim contrasts two scenarios: visibility at 17 feet indicating flatness, and visibility at 23 feet indicating curvature. The summary of the criterion is that the observer should only be able to see the light when the light source is at 17 feet.
Following this explanation, Enrique is instructed to proceed with the demonstration “down there,” with Speaker 0 directing him to hold the light at the stated height. The instruction is precise about the height at which Enrique should operate the light: 17 feet. The dialogue then records a moment of practical verification, as Speaker 0 notes that they cannot see Enrique—indicating the light is not in the immediate line of sight from their current vantage—and then instructs Enrique to “lift up your lift up your light way above your head.” This directive introduces an adjustment to the light’s position, moving it higher than the previously specified 17 feet, which aligns with the experiment’s focus on whether visibility persists at a higher elevation.
The sequence emphasizes a procedural shift: after establishing the 17-foot height as a reference point, the participants adjust the setup by elevating the light beyond that height, potentially to observe how changes in elevation affect visibility through the experimental holes. The overall interaction is concise and procedural, centering on whether the light would become visible under different height conditions, thereby distinguishing between a flat-Earth and curved-Earth interpretation according to the stated criteria. The exchange ends with the instruction to raise the light, labeled as “interesting” in the transcription, signaling a moment of curiosity or anticipation about the outcome of elevating the light during the demonstration.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have a backup experiment. If you're seeing through this hole through the next hole, and seeing the light at the backboard or at 17 feet off the water, the earth is flat. If he's holding it up at 23 feet high and we're seeing the light, well, that's because the earth's curved. So I I should only be able to see it when it's at 17 feet. Okay, go ahead and drive down there, Enrique.
You're gonna hold the light there. Enrique, how high is your light? 17 feet. I mean, I, you know, it's just, there's we don't see you, Enrique. Lift up your lift up your light way above your head.
Interesting.
@idropFbombs - 𝐘𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐠𝐥𝐨𝐛𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐮𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐬 🌎🗑
Flat earth in 7 minutes and 59 seconds. Can you swing it? https://t.co/vj3gR0FOkC
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the heliocentric model, questioning the consistency of day and night on Earth. They mention Warner Von Braun's alleged prediction of a fake alien invasion to initiate a space weapon project. The conversation shifts to connections between NASA, satanism, and science fiction. Warner Von Braun's tombstone inscription referencing the firmament is highlighted as evidence of deception about space. The discussion concludes with skepticism about gravity's ability to hold water on a spinning Earth.
Translation: The speaker talks about doubts regarding the heliocentric model and Warner Von Braun's alleged prediction of a fake alien invasion. They discuss connections between NASA, satanism, and science fiction, pointing out Warner Von Braun's tombstone inscription as evidence of deception about space. The conversation ends with skepticism about gravity's ability to hold water on a spinning Earth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The heliocentric model. Right? Let's just say this is the sun. Right? And we have all these planets going around the sun.
Right? Mercury is the the the one closest to the sun, and then Venus is is going this way. And then Earth is the third one, 3rd rock in the sun, and then Mars. Right? It takes a year to go around the sun.
Takes a year. Takes 6 months to get to this side. This is what they're telling us. So our planet is going around the sun. It's daytime on the part of Earth that's facing the sun.
There's no way this side of Earth is nighttime when the sun is on the inside. Nighttime is always on the outside.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 0: It's always on the
Speaker 1: outside. Right.
Speaker 0: So we're looking, like so if I'm right here Right. Right, we're looking at the out nighttime Yeah. With all the stars over here Right. On this side of the room.
Speaker 1: Right. Right.
Speaker 0: But on the other side of the sun, there's all a bunch of other stars. Right? Right. Right?
Speaker 1: Okay. Oh, yeah.
Speaker 0: I could only see this side of the universe. Okay. Right? But when when in 6 months, when I'm on this side, I could only see at night, it's only night when this side is facing out. So I only could see this side of the room.
Alright. Does that make sense? We got all these stars over here that we're seeing at night. Alright. 6 months later, we're seeing all of those stars.
Right? Right. And then 6 months later back, we're seeing all those stars. Right? So there should be at every 3 months or 6 months, there should be a different set of stars.
Constellation. Yeah. I don't know. We shouldn't see the same constellation.
Speaker 1: See the same
Speaker 0: constellation. Why do we why do we see the big dipper every night. Every night. Yes. Warner von Braun was Hitler's right hand man.
He was his rocket scientist. And and after World War 2, the United States took about 1200 Nazi scientists Paperclip. Including Operation Paperclip. They they took all these Nazi scientists, and, they took Warner von Braun. He's the head of NASA.
He directed realize that. He directed all 6 moon missions.
Speaker 1: And
Speaker 0: And when he when he died, he had cancer for about a couple years before he died. And when he got cancer, during the last 4 years of his life, he hired this woman, doctor Carol Roslin, and she was his assistant. His, you know, prepared speeches for him him for 4 years. And you could go on YouTube and hear her talk about this all the time. She said that he told her they're creating enemies.
They need to Warner Von Braun, their prices. They're they need to create an asteroid. They need, according to Warner Von Braun, the
Speaker 1: Like a crisis.
Speaker 0: They're they need a crisis. They need a reason to, start a Star Wars project, like, weaponized space. And he and Warner Von Braun told doctor Carol Roslin, look that shit up. She'll tell you right out of her mouth. She said that he told her over and over again, the final threat is a fake alien invasion, and it's gonna be a lie.
He told her over and over for 4 years. Wouldn't get into detail. She said he would not explain, or go into detail, but he made it really clear on his deathbed. He made it clear till the day he died. They're just
Speaker 1: I mean, some people that were involved in the in the creation of NASA was Jack Parsons.
Speaker 0: And and what is isn't he a satanist?
Speaker 1: A satanist.
Speaker 0: And what about Walt Disney 2. Walt Disney and Warner Von Braun were Not deceased. They were they were boys. They're so not easy. You go to Disneyland and yeah.
It's Space Mountain. And Disneyland was big in pushing space and getting space in
Speaker 1: else had something to do with that. L Ron Hubbard. Nobody talks about that because
Speaker 0: l Ron Hubbard was Science fiction writer.
Speaker 1: Best friends with Jack w Parsons and l Ron Hubbard and banging Jack's wife and it just caused chaos.
Speaker 0: Throw Anton LaVey in there, the founder of the satanic church.
Speaker 1: Elsa Crowley, dog.
Speaker 0: Exactly. Friend of all of us. When you start putting all those characters together in the same fucking room
Speaker 1: I can't wait to hear that.
Speaker 0: Makes sense. It makes sense that they are trying to they they're creating this infinite space. Put up Warner Von Braun's tomb stone.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 0: Dude, on his dick. He was trying to tell people. Try to
Speaker 1: tell people. On his tombstone. Fucking It
Speaker 0: That's true. Put tombstone. He has a a Bible verse. You're fucking kidding me. He has a Bible verse.
Look at that. Look at that. Look at that. Warner Von Braun. What what does it say?
Psalm, what, 191?
Speaker 1: 191.
Speaker 0: Watch. And then go read what that is. Now put up Psalm
Speaker 1: 19 one. At the bottom. Bam. Bam. Look at that.
Speaker 0: What does it mean? Put that up. Now, now, what does what does it say? What does what does that what does that sound? Okay.
This is coming from the dude who faked 6 moon missions. Look at that.
Speaker 1: The heavens declare the glory of God, and the ferment seweth The firmament. The firmament
Speaker 0: seweth his handiwork. Now the firmament, that's the dome. That's the that's what separates the the heaven the heavens from earth or the waters from above and the waters from below. That's the firmament. That's the dome.
That's when flat earthers believe in a dome. They're actually talking about the firmament.
Speaker 1: Shut up, dude.
Speaker 0: That was on Warner Robron Braun's tombstone. Get the fuck out of here. Right? Look at that.
Speaker 1: Dude, shut up.
Speaker 0: The heavens declare the glory of god and the firmament shoe with his handiwork. That's what Warner von Braun put on his tombstone. Get the fuck out of here. That's a deathbed confessional right there. That's a dead the guy who takes 6 moon missions God, dude.
Put that shit
Speaker 1: on his tombstone. Oh my god. Is the structure above a conceived as a vast solid dome.
Speaker 0: And that's what Werner Von Braun put on his tombstone, dude. Come on.
Speaker 1: Aaron, that looks like the fucking house underworld too. There's an underworld right there.
Speaker 0: They're lying to us about space, man. That's that's that's I'll never What
Speaker 1: is on the other side of the dome? Heaven of the heavens. That's what it says.
Speaker 0: What is that? No one know. You know, people say, well, where's the proof of flat earth? It's like, dude, we're not the ones with with all the NASA $18,000,000,000 budget. You know what I mean?
We don't have to prove shit. You have to prove what you should ram down our throats as as children. Blowing my mind. All we're doing is breaking down what you're saying. We don't have to prove You're breaking.
We don't have any equipment. We can't how are we gonna prove it? You're blowing my mind. You know one thing that we can prove that I know for sure is that most of the earth is water. Right?
Yeah. Yeah. 70, 80%.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: And water always finds its level, man. The only thing that the only thing that's holding helium balloon? Helium balloon ain't gonna go down. It goes up, but it defied gravity? No.
Helium is less dense than the air around it, so it rises. You drop a a boulder in the ocean, it goes sinks right to the ground. You drop a beach ball in the ocean, it stays right there at the top. Air in that ball is less dense than the water. Fucking gravity's holding gravity is so strong that it's holding oceans stuck to a ball, but it can't hold a fucking helium balloon.
Water water always finds its level, and water always conforms to the interior of a container, not the exterior of a container. So all that, like, we're on a ball and the oceans are conforming to the outside of the ball, ball, and then there's this mystical, magical, powerful force, gravity holding it together. So wait a minute. We got inertia that's trying to fling the water off the ball as it spins a 1000 miles an hour, but then the gravity is fighting. There's a battle between the inertia and the gravity, but there's no sign of this battle.
@VincentCrypt46 - Vincent Kennedy
Imagine where we would be. https://t.co/WJT2NmYwZi
Video Transcript AI Summary
Stan's inventions harnessed energy from the vacuum of space, known as zero point energy. This energy is abundant and can power devices like Tesla's Wardenclyffe tower and Howard Johnson's magnetron motor. Despite proving their devices worked, inventors like Johnson faced skepticism and were denied patents. Johnson's motor operated efficiently for years until his equipment was stolen, leading him to stop his work. The scientific community struggles to reconcile these inventions with traditional beliefs, highlighting the potential of tapping into limitless energy sources.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, turns out that Stan's water car was his least important invention. That doughnut shaped device was another invention that created energy. And the reason it was classified? Well, it didn't run on gas. It didn't run on water.
It ran on nothing. The vacuum of space is supposed to be empty. And at the temperature of absolute 0, it should be perfectly still. But quantum physicists discovered that empty space is not empty or still at all.
Speaker 1: Is that, so called empty space isn't really empty at all. It's actually full of energy. So instead of being like kind of a quiet empty lake, it's more like the frost at the base of a waterfall or something.
Speaker 0: Now we've all been taught that in an atom, electrons orbit the nucleus like planets orbit the sun. In a vacuum with no resistance, the orbits of electrons should be predictable, but they're not. In 1955, Willis Lamb won the Nobel Prize for discovering what's become known as the Lamb shift. Now in simple terms, Lamb discovered that electrons and hydrogen atoms were being disturbed by something. He discovered complex interactions between the electron and the vacuum of space itself.
Space is teeming with quantum particles that blink in and out of existence. And when they do that, they use and create energy, a lot of it.
Speaker 1: When you go look at the numbers, you find out that there's enough energy in the volume of a coffee cup to evaporate all the world's oceans that you could get it all off.
Speaker 0: Enough energy to boil and evaporate all the oceans on earth from a coffee cup of empty space. This energy is called 0 point energy, and it's generated from the 0 point field. Nikola Tesla, Nikolai Kosyarev, and other scientists called this field the ether. The ether is a field in which everything exists, but it in a dimension that our brains can't perceive. Particles blinking in and out of existence have to be coming from and going somewhere.
That place is the ether, the base layer of reality. But even though we can't see it, this layer can be disrupted with electromagnetism. Now Tesla's Wardenclyffe tower tapped into this endless supply of energy. The tower was considered an overunity device. An overunity is when something gives out more energy than is put in.
Now mainstream science claims this is impossible. Again, because it breaks the second law of thermodynamics. But for over a 100 years, scientists and inventors have proved that claim wrong. Zero point energy devices also violate the conservation of energy, That energy can't be created or destroyed. But those inventors don't claim to be creating energy from nothing.
They are tapping in the energy that already exists everywhere all around us. In the 19 seventies, Howard Johnson created the magnetron motor. It used hydrogen, magnets, light rays, and fusion to create electricity. Now according to practical physics, his invention was impossible. But here's the thing, his motor worked, and he proved it over and over again.
Still, he was denied a patent.
Speaker 2: The dilemma facing Johnson is not really his dilemma, but rather that of other scientists who have observed his prototypes. The devices obviously do work, but the textbooks say they shouldn't. Johnson is saying to the scientific community that this is a phenomenon that seems to contradict some of our traditional beliefs. For all our sakes, let's not dismiss it outright, but take the time to understand the complex forces at work here.
Speaker 0: Johnson didn't get his patent and was shunned by the scientific community. Now Howard Johnson wasn't a weekend garage tinkerer. He was a government contractor. He worked on atomic energy projects. He made equipment for the military.
He already had over 30 patents for chemistry and physics devices.
Speaker 1: Science and physicists are especially determined to protect the law of conservation of know what the game is, but they are so scared.
Speaker 0: Johnson's motor would lose less than 2% efficiency in almost 20 years of continuous operation, but he stopped working when someone broke into a shop and stole his equipment. He got the message.
@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly
Who remembers this? https://t.co/anxTzcpVvJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Double vaxxed, boosted, flu shot, and shingle shot, the speaker still gets their period. They traveled to Mexico twice, did shows and meet and greets, and never got COVID. The speaker believes Jesus loves them the most.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To brag. I don't care. But I want you to know double vaxxed, booster, flu shot, and I'm gonna be honest. I have the shingle shot too. And I still get my period.
What? Yes. Traveled. Went to Mexico twice. Did shows, meet and greets.
Never got COVID. Clearly, Jesus loves me the most. Seriously. So nice. So nice.
@CartlandDavid - Dr David Cartland BMedSci MBChB MRCGP (2014)
Incredible coincidence https://t.co/zzvKyjMh4D
@thedailyrabbit_ - THE WHITE RABBIT
Largest coincidence ever! https://t.co/7xAT7T8CyB
Video Transcript AI Summary
Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy share numerous coincidences. Both were elected to Congress in 1946, became presidents in 1860 and 1960, and were focused on civil rights. Their wives lost a child while in the White House, and both were assassinated on a Friday, shot in the head. Lincoln's secretary was named Kennedy, while Kennedy's secretary was named Lincoln. Both were succeeded by Southerners named Johnson, born in 1808 and 1908, respectively. Their assassins, John Wilkes Booth and Lee Harvey Oswald, were born in 1839 and 1939, respectively, and both had three names with 15 letters. Lincoln was shot at Ford's Theater, while Kennedy was shot in a Lincoln car made by Ford. Both assassins were killed before their trials. A week before Lincoln's assassination, he was in Monroe, Maryland, and a week before Kennedy's, he was with Marilyn Monroe.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is the largest coincidence in history. See if your history teacher can explain this. Abraham Lincoln was elected to congress in 18 46. John f Kennedy was elected to congress in 1946. Abraham Lincoln was elected president in 18/60.
John f Kennedy was elected president in 1960. Both were particularly concerned with civil rights. Both wives lost a child while living in the White House. Both presidents were shot on a Friday. Both presidents were shot in the head.
Now it gets really weird. Lincoln's secretary was named Kennedy. Kennedy's secretary was named Lincoln. Both were assassinated by Southerners. Both were succeeded by Southerners named Johnson.
Andrew Johnson, who succeeded Lincoln, was born in 18 08. Lyndon Johnson, who succeeded Kennedy, was born in 190 8. John Wilkes Booth, who assassinated Lincoln, was born in 18/39. Lee Harvey Oswald, who assassinated Kennedy, was born in 1939. Both assassins were known by their three names.
Both names are composed of 15 letters. Now hang on to your seat. Lincoln was shot at the theater named Ford. Kennedy was shot in a car called Lincoln made by Ford. Booth and Oswald were assassinated before their trials.
And here's the kicker. A week before Lincoln was shot, he was in Monroe, Maryland. A week before Kennedy was shot, he was with Marilyn Monroe. And Lincoln was shot in a theater, and the assassin ran to a warehouse. Kennedy was shot from a warehouse, and the assassin ran to a theater.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
How is this possible!?! https://t.co/vahNzteaR7
Video Transcript AI Summary
Newly released videos show the collision between an American Airlines flight and a US Army Black Hawk helicopter. In the first video, the Black Hawk is seen flying over the Potomac, while the American Airlines plane approaches the airport. The two aircraft collide, resulting in a mid-air explosion and both falling into the river. The second video captures the moments before the collision, showing both aircraft traveling toward each other. After the impact, the airliner spins into the water, and the Black Hawk also descends into the river.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: These videos obtained exclusively by CNN show previously unseen angles of the collision between an American Airlines flight and a US Army Black Hawk helicopter. In the first video, the Black Hawk can be seen flying at speed over the Potomac from the left side of the screen. The American Airlines plane can be seen flying towards the airport before the 2 collide causing a mid air explosion and fall into the river. In the second video, you can see the army helicopter and American Airlines plane travel toward each other. After the collision and subsequent explosion, the airliner can be seen spinning into the water, and the Black Hawk is also seen falling into the water.
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
I almost forgot this happened lol https://t.co/OKcMIqIb9H
Video Transcript AI Summary
In October, the speaker was on a Zoom call with New Yorker colleagues. During a break, the speaker was caught masturbating on camera. As a result, the speaker was fired from the New Yorker after 27 years and has since been on leave from CNN.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In October, you were on a Zoom call with your colleagues from the New Yorker magazine. Everyone took a break for several minutes during which time you were caught masturbating on camera. You were subsequently fired from that job after twenty seven years of working there, and you since then have been on leave from CNN. Do I have all that right? You got it all right.
Sad to say.
@LionelMedia - 🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸
Go ahead. Try to explain this. https://t.co/TxFOvPXb5S
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Brooklyn Bridge is crashing. Sales are hitting great. Something is going on.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Crashing to the Brooklyn Bridge. It's totally crashing. Look. Look. The sales are hitting great.
It was. Look. Oh god. Oh my god. What is going on?
@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman
Is the Globe Earth Theory a Lie? @holisticnut33 explores: https://t.co/ONDp107h1T
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 presents a deep-dive critique of globe Earth claims, arguing there is legitimacy to a flat-Earth view. He starts by examining NASA’s most recent globe image from outer space, noting stars in the background and claiming the picture is from twenty-something years ago, and comparing two NASA globe images showing the United States at different sizes “in the very next year,” questioning how that is possible. He asserts the globe image has “copied and pasted clouds” and asks if the globe was made in Photoshop.
He then discusses a moon picture with the earth behind it, urging attention to the sides and asking how the earth could be drastically smaller when observed from the moon, yet drastically larger when you’re about 50,000 miles away from the moon. He claims that, when put into context, “they’re completely lying to our faces,” and describes the lunar module as looking “absolutely ridiculous,” calling it a replica and a toy, and questions whether the buttons have real functions and why ten thousand buttons would be needed.
He questions who recorded the lunar module launch, noting that there were no fully autonomous cameras or drones at the time, and asks “Who got left on the moon?” He asserts that the moon landing was implanted as a false reality on the subconscious mind to govern conscious behaviors, linking Apollo 11 to symbolic numerology (11) and stating that the moon and sun are symbolic pillars representing subconscious and conscious realms. He claims the moon landing was a symbolic act to capture imagination and limit consciousness.
He asks if the Earth were a globe, one would have to sit at eye level with water to have a perfectly flat horizon, implying a flat horizon because Chicago’s skyline is visible from about 40 miles across Lake Michigan. He states that curvature would be eight inches per mile squared, so buildings would have to be level with the floor and would appear to lean if the Earth were globe. He claims there is no detectable curvature on any body of water, and that the horizon is merely how far the eye can see.
Regarding circumnavigation, he asserts there is no proof of east-to-west circumnavigation but no evidence of north-to-south circumnavigation, arguing that north is the center on a flat map and that circumnavigating north to south would leave the magnetic field. He mentions Antarctica’s average elevation and its role in “holding all of the waters in,” and notes no country has a flag shape for its nation, while Antarctica does. He calls attention to the Antarctic Treaty and contrasts it with Greenland, and mentions crepuscular rays as evidence of a local sun, and claims that if the sun were 93 million miles away, light rays would be perfectly parallel and seasons would be explained differently. He claims the moon gives off its own light, with a few degrees colder Fahrenheit than the surrounding atmosphere, which would not be possible if the moon merely reflects the sun’s light. He references a model visually and asserts that what is shown makes no sense if the Earth is a globe.
He concludes by saying the video is “the tip of the iceberg,” asserting that observing no curvature and the sun and moon appearing the same size and moving across the sky might reflect what’s actually happening. He ends with, “But of course, the earth is a globe and I made everything up,” and states, “This video was for entertainment purposes only.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So why do I actually think that the earth is flat? Am I just making a bunch of stuff up just to get your attention and get views? Or is there legitimacy to what I'm saying? So why don't we take a real deep dive into the situation? So this is supposedly the most recent picture of the globe from outer space.
Notice how they have stars in the background for once. That's pretty nice. But this is a picture of the globe from, I'm not sure, like twenty something years ago. Look at the size of The US. Now look at the size of The US of the picture of the globe the very next year.
Both were taken by NASA. The United States is literally twice the size in the picture previous. How is that even possible? And then if you look at the picture of the globe, it has copied and pasted clouds. So was the globe made in Photoshop?
Yeah. It literally was. And then we have this picture of the moon. Apparently, that's the dark side of the moon and then the earth behind it. Now pay attention to the sides.
This is a picture of the earth from the moon being on the moon. So how's the earth drastically smaller when you're on the moon? But if you're like 50,000 miles away from the moon, then the Earth is drastically larger. You see, when you really try to put all of this into context, you understand that they're completely lying to our faces. And it's so unbelievably obvious.
Now, the lunar module looks absolutely ridiculous. And here's a replica of someone looking around inside a lunar module. A replica replica lunar module. It looks ridiculous. It looks like a kid's toy.
You really mean to tell me that those buttons have like real things that they do? They need 10,000 buttons to do something like this? And it's really crazy because not only does this look extremely fake of the lunar module blasting off from the moon, but who was recording the lunar module taking off? We didn't have fully autonomous cameras and drones like we do today. So who was recording it?
Who got left on the moon? This is what I'm saying. All you have to do is use your mind. But the thing is they implanted this false reality on your subconscious mind. Why do you think they call it Apollo 11?
Well, 11 in numerology is very very symbolic. You know, like the twin towers, the two pillars. It's symbolic for whatever happens in the material world. One pillar, will happen in the non material, the subconscious world, the other pillar. So whatever happens in the internal is reflected in the external.
Whatever happens in the external is reflected in the internal. Well, the moon is on one pillar and the sun is on the other. The sun rules the conscious masculine. The moon rules the subconscious and feminine. So symbolically speaking, the US government implanted their own reality into your subconscious mind, so that they can govern and control and manipulate your conscious behaviors.
That's why they did the moon landing. It's all symbolic for capturing your imagination, capturing your mind, and limiting your ability to expand your consciousness. If the Earth is a globe, then you would literally have to be at eye level, sitting at eye level with the water in order to have a perfectly flat horizon, which means that you wouldn't be able to see the Chicago skyline, which I just showed you from roughly 40 miles away across Lake Michigan. It would be under eight inches per eight inches per mile squared of curvature, which means that every mile, would be exponentially curving more. And if we were on a globe and we were constructing buildings on a globe, then the buildings would have to be level with the floor beneath it.
Well, if we're on a globe, it's constantly curving like this. So the buildings across the water, they would also be leaning back if you were able to see them at all. Are you keeping up with what I'm saying here? There's no possible way that the Earth could be a globe if there's no detectable curvature on any body of water ever, and there's no detectable curvature no matter how high we go. The horizon is not a physical horizon.
It is literally just how far our eyes can see. And how come we've had so many people circumnavigate the globe east to west, but we don't have any proof, any evidence, no success when it comes to circumnavigating the globe north to south? Well, that's because it's literally impossible. You would have to be flying over Antarctica. Well, no one can go to Antarctica, first of all.
But second of all, you would just be leaving the magnetic field. Because on a flat earth model, north is the center. So if you're circumnavigating east to west, you're just going in circles. And that's what the word circumnavigation means. So you can't circumnavigate north to south because north is the center, south is leaving the magnetic field on the flat plane that we're on, and beyond the Arctic Circle or the Antarctic Circle or the ice wall, whatever you wanna call it, beyond that, who knows what's beyond?
It. But I do know that Antarctica has an average elevation of over 8,000 feet above sea level. It's literally holding all of the waters in. And what's really weird is no country, no nation on earth has a picture of the shape of the country or nation as its flag, but Antarctica does. And of all the treaties that have been broken throughout human history, the Antarctic treaty is the most important one that every government around the world just unanimously agrees on.
We have that whole thing going on with Greenland. Why not Antarctica? Weird. And you've seen crepuscular light rays. Right?
Where it literally looks like the sun's light is like peeking through the clouds at this specific angle. Well, means that the sun is literally small and local, much smaller than the earth and moving overhead. Because if we had a sun that was 93,000,000 miles away, all of the light rays coming to Earth would be perfectly parallel. And that very small difference with the Earth's wobble would not cause the seasons. And then if you look at the moon, it's clearly giving off its own light source.
There's no possible way that it could be waxing and waning in a twenty eight day cycle, and the moon's light could be a few degrees colder Fahrenheit on average than the atmosphere around it. Meaning the moon is giving off its own source of cold light. There's no possible way that that would be happening if we were on a globe and the moon was a rock reflecting the sun's light. Like this model right here makes literally no sense. All you have to do is investigate.
So this is just the tip of the iceberg, guys. I just gave you all the tip of the iceberg. But if you can observe that there's no curvature and that the sun and moon appear to be the same size and they appear to be moving across the sky, then that's probably what they're doing, guys. That's probably the thing that's actually happening. But of course, the earth is a globe and I made everything up.
This video was for entertainment purposes only.